openAI-math-dataset / lean /OAI /Combinatorics /MatrixRemoval /DirectNonshattering.lean
roseking's picture
Add lean source and binary files (part 47)
e5a97c6 verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
12.2 kB
import Mathlib
namespace OAI
/-!
A direct qualitative proof of the non-anchor trace obstruction.
No enumeration of suffix generators is needed.
If all binary words occur, any two selected columns in the same class can be
separated by a singleton word, contradicting their suffix monotonicity.
Thus all five classes are distinct. The word 11110 then uses four classes,
while a variable row uses at most three and a dummy row is all ones.
-/
universe uR uC uK uL uRho uBeta
namespace Problem348.DirectNonshattering
open Finset
/-- A surjective family of class-monotone words separates the column classes. -/
theorem class_injective_of_surjective
{R : Type uR} {C : Type uC} {K : Type uK} [DecidableEq C] [LinearOrder K]
{L : Type uL} (classOf : C → L) (key : C → K) (A : R → C → Bool)
(hmono : ∀ r i j, classOf i = classOf j → key i ≤ key j →
A r i = true → A r j = true)
(hsurj : Function.Surjective A) : Function.Injective classOf := by
intro i j hij
by_contra hne
rcases le_total (key i) (key j) with hle | hle
· obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := hsurj (fun x => decide (x = i))
have hi : A r i = true := by rw [hr]; simp
have hj : A r j = true := hmono r i j hij hle hi
rw [hr] at hj
simp [Ne.symm hne] at hj
· obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := hsurj (fun x => decide (x = j))
have hj : A r j = true := by rw [hr]; simp
have hi : A r i = true := hmono r j i hij.symm hle hj
rw [hr] at hi
simp [hne] at hi
/-- General form: `q + 2` columns cannot be shattered by classwise suffix
rows supported on at most `q` classes, together with all-one rows. -/
theorem not_surjective_of_card
{R : Type uR} {C : Type uC} {L : Type uL} {K : Type uK} [Fintype C] [DecidableEq C] [DecidableEq L]
[LinearOrder K] (q : ℕ) (hcard : q + 2 ≤ Fintype.card C)
(classOf : C → L) (key : C → K) (A : R → C → Bool)
(hmono : ∀ r i j, classOf i = classOf j → key i ≤ key j →
A r i = true → A r j = true)
(hsupport : ∀ r,
((univ.filter (fun i => A r i = true)).image classOf).card ≤ q ∨
(∀ i, A r i = true)) :
¬ Function.Surjective A := by
classical
intro hsurj
have hinj := class_injective_of_surjective classOf key A hmono hsurj
have : Nonempty C := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mp (by omega)
let j : C := Classical.arbitrary C
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := hsurj (fun i => decide (i ≠ j))
rcases hsupport r with hs | hd
· rw [hr, card_image_of_injective _ hinj] at hs
change (univ.filter (fun i : C => decide (i ≠ j) = true)).card ≤ q at hs
have hfilter : (univ.filter (fun i : C => decide (i ≠ j) = true)) =
univ.erase j := by
ext i
simp
rw [hfilter, card_erase_of_mem (mem_univ j), card_univ] at hs
omega
· have hj := hd j
rw [hr] at hj
simp at hj
/-- No family with suffixes in at most three classes, plus all-one rows,
realizes every binary word on five columns. -/
theorem not_surjective_five
{R : Type uR} {L : Type uL} {K : Type uK} [DecidableEq L] [LinearOrder K]
(classOf : Fin 5 → L) (key : Fin 5 → K) (A : R → Fin 5 → Bool)
(hmono : ∀ r i j, classOf i = classOf j → key i ≤ key j →
A r i = true → A r j = true)
(hsupport : ∀ r,
((univ.filter (fun i => A r i = true)).image classOf).card ≤ 3 ∨
(∀ i, A r i = true)) :
¬ Function.Surjective A :=
not_surjective_of_card 3 (by simp) classOf key A hmono hsupport
/-- The conclusion in a form convenient for a five-column shattering test. -/
theorem exists_missing_word
{R : Type uR} {L : Type uL} {K : Type uK} [DecidableEq L] [LinearOrder K]
(classOf : Fin 5 → L) (key : Fin 5 → K) (A : R → Fin 5 → Bool)
(hmono : ∀ r i j, classOf i = classOf j → key i ≤ key j →
A r i = true → A r j = true)
(hsupport : ∀ r,
((univ.filter (fun i => A r i = true)).image classOf).card ≤ 3 ∨
(∀ i, A r i = true)) :
∃ w : Fin 5 → Bool, ∀ r, A r ≠ w := by
simpa only [Function.Surjective, not_forall, not_exists] using
not_surjective_five classOf key A hmono hsupport
/-- A column equal to one in every row also rules out shattering immediately. -/
theorem not_surjective_of_constant_column
{R : Type uR} {C : Type uC} (A : R → C → Bool) (j : C)
(hj : ∀ r, A r j = true) : ¬ Function.Surjective A := by
intro hsurj
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := hsurj (fun _ => false)
have h := hj r
rw [hr] at h
cases h
/-- Whole-host version. Dummy columns are all ones, and every non-dummy row
has at most three active classes among the non-dummy columns. The chosen five
columns need not be ordered or even assumed distinct. -/
theorem not_surjective_selected_columns
{R : Type uR} {C : Type uC} {L : Type uL} {K : Type uK} [Fintype C] [DecidableEq C] [DecidableEq L]
[LinearOrder K]
(A : R → C → Bool) (dummyRow : R → Prop) (dummyColumn : C → Prop)
[DecidablePred dummyColumn]
(classOf : C → L) (key : C → K)
(hrow : ∀ r, dummyRow r → ∀ c, A r c = true)
(hcolumn : ∀ c, dummyColumn c → ∀ r, A r c = true)
(hmono : ∀ r, ¬ dummyRow r → ∀ c d,
¬ dummyColumn c → ¬ dummyColumn d → classOf c = classOf d →
key c ≤ key d → A r c = true → A r d = true)
(hsupport : ∀ r, ¬ dummyRow r →
((univ.filter (fun c => ¬ dummyColumn c ∧ A r c = true)).image classOf).card ≤ 3)
(selected : Fin 5 → C) :
¬ Function.Surjective (fun r i => A r (selected i)) := by
classical
by_cases hdummy : ∃ i, dummyColumn (selected i)
· obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := hdummy
exact not_surjective_of_constant_column (fun r j => A r (selected j)) i
(hcolumn (selected i) hi)
· have hnondummy : ∀ i, ¬ dummyColumn (selected i) := by
simpa only [not_exists] using hdummy
apply not_surjective_five (classOf ∘ selected) (key ∘ selected)
(fun r i => A r (selected i))
· intro r i j hij hle hi
by_cases hr : dummyRow r
· exact hrow r hr (selected j)
· exact hmono r hr (selected i) (selected j)
(hnondummy i) (hnondummy j) hij hle hi
· intro r
by_cases hr : dummyRow r
· exact Or.inr (fun i => hrow r hr (selected i))
· left
refine (card_le_card (show
(univ.filter (fun i => A r (selected i) = true)).image (classOf ∘ selected) ⊆
(univ.filter (fun c => ¬ dummyColumn c ∧ A r c = true)).image classOf
from ?_)).trans (hsupport r hr)
intro l hl
obtain ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ := mem_image.mp hl
exact mem_image.mpr ⟨selected i,
mem_filter.mpr ⟨mem_univ _, hnondummy i, (mem_filter.mp hi).2⟩, rfl⟩
/-- On `k+2` coordinates, classwise monotone traces with at most `k`
active classes, allowing also the constant-one trace, omit a Boolean word.
The rank need not be injective within a class. -/
theorem exists_missing_word_with_zero {ρ : Type uRho} {β : Type uBeta} [DecidableEq β] (k : ℕ)
(cls : Fin (k + 2) → β) (key : Fin (k + 2) → ℕ)
(trace : ρ → Fin (k + 2) → Bool)
(hup : ∀ r a b, cls a = cls b → key a ≤ key b →
trace r a = true → trace r b = true)
(hsupport : ∀ r, (∀ j, trace r j = true) ∨
((Finset.univ.filter (fun j => trace r j = true)).image cls).card ≤ k) :
∃ word : Fin (k + 2) → Bool,
(∃ j, word j = false) ∧ ∀ r, trace r ≠ word := by
classical
by_cases hinj : Function.Injective cls
· let word : Fin (k + 2) → Bool := fun j => decide (j ≠ 0)
refine ⟨word, ⟨0, by simp [word]⟩, ?_⟩
intro r heq
rcases hsupport r with hall | hsmall
· have hzero := hall 0
rw [heq] at hzero
simp [word] at hzero
· rw [heq] at hsmall
rw [Finset.card_image_of_injective _ hinj] at hsmall
have hset : Finset.univ.filter (fun j : Fin (k + 2) => word j = true) =
Finset.univ.erase 0 := by
ext j
simp [word]
rw [hset] at hsmall
simp at hsmall
· obtain ⟨a, b, hab, hne⟩ := Function.not_injective_iff.mp hinj
have hp : ∃ a b : Fin (k + 2),
a ≠ b ∧ cls a = cls b ∧ key a ≤ key b := by
rcases le_total (key a) (key b) with h | h
· exact ⟨a, b, hne, hab, h⟩
· exact ⟨b, a, hne.symm, hab.symm, h⟩
obtain ⟨a, b, hne, hab, hkey⟩ := hp
let word : Fin (k + 2) → Bool := fun j => decide (j = a)
refine ⟨word, ⟨b, by simp [word, hne.symm]⟩, ?_⟩
intro r heq
have ha : trace r a = true := by simp [heq, word]
have hb := hup r a b hab hkey ha
simp [heq, word, hne.symm] at hb
/-- Coordinatewise form of the missing-word theorem. -/
theorem exists_missing_word_pointwise {ρ : Type uRho} {β : Type uBeta} [DecidableEq β] (k : ℕ)
(cls : Fin (k + 2) → β) (key : Fin (k + 2) → ℕ)
(trace : ρ → Fin (k + 2) → Bool)
(hup : ∀ r a b, cls a = cls b → key a ≤ key b →
trace r a = true → trace r b = true)
(hsupport : ∀ r, (∀ j, trace r j = true) ∨
((Finset.univ.filter (fun j => trace r j = true)).image cls).card ≤ k) :
∃ word : Fin (k + 2) → Bool, ∀ r, ∃ j, trace r j ≠ word j := by
classical
obtain ⟨word, _, hw⟩ := exists_missing_word_with_zero k cls key trace hup hsupport
refine ⟨word, fun r => ?_⟩
by_contra h
push Not at h
exact hw r (funext h)
/-- Matrix-facing form, handling both dummy columns and dummy rows.
No injectivity assumption on the selected columns is needed. -/
theorem matrix_missing_word {R : Type uR} {C : Type uC} {β : Type uBeta} [DecidableEq β] (k : ℕ)
(A : R → C → Bool) (cols : Fin (k + 2) → C)
(cls : C → β) (key : C → ℕ) (dummyRow : R → Prop) (dummyCol : C → Prop)
(hdummyRow : ∀ r, dummyRow r → ∀ c, A r c = true)
(hdummyCol : ∀ c, dummyCol c → ∀ r, A r c = true)
(hup : ∀ r, ¬ dummyRow r → ∀ a b,
¬ dummyCol a → ¬ dummyCol b → cls a = cls b → key a ≤ key b →
A r a = true → A r b = true)
(hsupport : ∀ r, ¬ dummyRow r →
(∀ j, ¬ dummyCol (cols j)) →
((Finset.univ.filter (fun j => A r (cols j) = true)).image
(cls ∘ cols)).card ≤ k) :
∃ word : Fin (k + 2) → Bool, ∀ r, ∃ j, A r (cols j) ≠ word j := by
classical
by_cases hd : ∃ j, dummyCol (cols j)
· obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := hd
refine ⟨fun _ => false, fun r => ⟨j, ?_⟩⟩
simp [hdummyCol (cols j) hj r]
· push Not at hd
apply exists_missing_word_pointwise k (cls ∘ cols) (key ∘ cols)
(fun r j => A r (cols j))
· intro r a b hab hkey ha
by_cases hr : dummyRow r
· exact hdummyRow r hr (cols b)
· exact hup r hr (cols a) (cols b) (hd a) (hd b) hab hkey ha
· intro r
by_cases hr : dummyRow r
· exact Or.inl (fun j => hdummyRow r hr (cols j))
· exact Or.inr (hsupport r hr hd)
/-- An explicit cover by at most `k` column classes is enough for the
support premise. This form avoids cardinal computations on selected columns. -/
theorem matrix_missing_word_of_class_cover {R : Type uR} {C : Type uC} {β : Type uBeta} [DecidableEq β] (k : ℕ)
(A : R → C → Bool) (cols : Fin (k + 2) → C)
(cls : C → β) (key : C → ℕ) (dummyRow : R → Prop) (dummyCol : C → Prop)
(hdummyRow : ∀ r, dummyRow r → ∀ c, A r c = true)
(hdummyCol : ∀ c, dummyCol c → ∀ r, A r c = true)
(hup : ∀ r, ¬ dummyRow r → ∀ a b,
¬ dummyCol a → ¬ dummyCol b → cls a = cls b → key a ≤ key b →
A r a = true → A r b = true)
(hcover : ∀ r, ¬ dummyRow r → ∃ S : Finset β, S.card ≤ k ∧
∀ c, ¬ dummyCol c → A r c = true → cls c ∈ S) :
∃ word : Fin (k + 2) → Bool, ∀ r, ∃ j, A r (cols j) ≠ word j := by
classical
apply matrix_missing_word k A cols cls key dummyRow dummyCol hdummyRow hdummyCol hup
intro r hr hcols
obtain ⟨S, hS, hmem⟩ := hcover r hr
apply le_trans (Finset.card_le_card ?_) hS
intro c hc
obtain ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩ := Finset.mem_image.mp hc
exact hmem (cols j) (hcols j) (Finset.mem_filter.mp hj).2
end Problem348.DirectNonshattering
end OAI