roseking's picture
Add lean source and binary files (part 59)
8df23f4 verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
53 kB
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import OAI.Computability.BinPacking.CookLevin.Bounds
import OAI.Computability.BinPacking.CookLevin.OutputOrder
namespace OAI
noncomputable section
namespace BinPackingGames.Foundations.Complexity.CookLevin
def decodePairAux : Nat → List Bool → Option (List Bool × List Bool)
| _, [] => none
| read, true :: rest => decodePairAux (read + 1) rest
| read, false :: rest =>
if read ≤ rest.length then some (rest.take read, rest.drop read) else none
def decodePair (bits : List Bool) : Option (List Bool × List Bool) :=
decodePairAux 0 bits
theorem decodePairAux_frame (read count : Nat) (rest : List Bool) :
decodePairAux read (List.replicate count true ++ false :: rest) =
if read + count ≤ rest.length then
some (rest.take (read + count), rest.drop (read + count)) else none := by
induction count generalizing read with
| zero => simp [decodePairAux]
| succ count ih =>
simp only [List.replicate_succ, List.cons_append, decodePairAux, ih]
simp only [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm 1 count]
@[simp] theorem decodePair_pairBits (input : List Bool × List Bool) :
decodePair (pairBits input) = some input := by
rcases input with ⟨x, witness⟩
simp [decodePair, pairBits, encodeWord, List.append_assoc,
decodePairAux_frame]
theorem pairBits_injective : Function.Injective pairBits := by
intro first second same
have h := congrArg decodePair same
simpa only [decodePair_pairBits, Option.some.injEq] using h
@[simp] theorem pairBits_length (input : List Bool × List Bool) :
(pairBits input).length = 2 * input.1.length + input.2.length + 1 := by
simp only [pairBits, List.length_append, encodeWord_length]
omega
def pairEncoding : Computability.Encoding (List Bool × List Bool) Bool where
encode := pairBits
decode := decodePair
decode_encode := decodePair_pairBits
theorem NPVerifier.acceptedLanguage_inNP (verifier : NPVerifier) :
InNP verifier.Accepts := ⟨verifier, fun _ => Iff.rfl⟩
structure PolynomialThreeSATReduction (language : List Bool → Prop) where
reduce : List Bool → Target.Formula
computation : Turing.TM2ComputableInPolyTime id formulaBits reduce
correct : ∀ input, language input ↔ (reduce input).Satisfiable
noncomputable def NPVerifier.horizon (verifier : NPVerifier) (inputLength : Nat) : Nat :=
verifier.computation.time.eval
(2 * inputLength + verifier.witnessBound.eval inputLength + 1)
theorem NPVerifier.input_time_le_horizon (verifier : NPVerifier)
(input witness : List Bool)
(bounded : witness.length ≤ verifier.witnessBound.eval input.length) :
verifier.computation.time.eval (pairBits (input, witness)).length ≤
verifier.horizon input.length := by
apply MachineComposition.natPolynomial_eval_mono
rw [pairBits_length]
exact Nat.add_le_add_right (Nat.add_le_add_left bounded _) _
def NPVerifier.runWithinHorizon (verifier : NPVerifier)
(input witness : List Bool)
(bounded : witness.length ≤ verifier.witnessBound.eval input.length) :
Turing.TM2OutputsInTime verifier.computation.tm
((pairBits (input, witness)).map verifier.computation.inputAlphabet.invFun)
(some ([verifier.verify (input, witness)].map verifier.computation.outputAlphabet.invFun))
(verifier.horizon input.length) where
toEvalsTo := (verifier.computation.outputsFun (input, witness)).toEvalsTo
steps_le_m := Nat.le_trans
(verifier.computation.outputsFun (input, witness)).steps_le_m
(verifier.input_time_le_horizon input witness bounded)
end BinPackingGames.Foundations.Complexity.CookLevin
namespace BinPackingGames.Foundations.Complexity.CookLevin.WitnessEncoding
open scoped BigOperators
abbrev Bits (q : Nat) := Fin (2 * q + 1) → Bool
def selector {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) (i : Fin (q + 1)) : Bool :=
bits ⟨i.val, by omega⟩
def payload {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) (i : Fin q) : Bool :=
bits ⟨q + 1 + i.val, by omega⟩
def pack {q : Nat} (lengthBits : Fin (q + 1) → Bool)
(payloadBits : Fin q → Bool) : Bits q := fun i =>
if h : i.val < q + 1 then lengthBits ⟨i.val, h⟩
else payloadBits ⟨i.val - (q + 1), by omega⟩
@[simp] theorem selector_pack {q : Nat} (lengthBits : Fin (q + 1) → Bool)
(payloadBits : Fin q → Bool) (i : Fin (q + 1)) :
selector (pack lengthBits payloadBits) i = lengthBits i := by
simp [selector, pack, i.isLt]
@[simp] theorem payload_pack {q : Nat} (lengthBits : Fin (q + 1) → Bool)
(payloadBits : Fin q → Bool) (i : Fin q) :
payload (pack lengthBits payloadBits) i = payloadBits i := by
simp [payload, pack]
omega
def Valid {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) : Prop :=
∃ length : Fin (q + 1), ∀ i, selector bits i = decide (i = length)
theorem valid_iff_local {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) :
Valid bits ↔
(∃ i, selector bits i = true) ∧
(∀ i j, selector bits i = true → selector bits j = true → i = j) := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨length, h⟩
refine ⟨⟨length, by simp [h]⟩, ?_⟩
intro i j hi hj
have hil : i = length := by simpa [h] using hi
have hjl : j = length := by simpa [h] using hj
exact hil.trans hjl.symm
· rintro ⟨⟨length, hl⟩, hu⟩
refine ⟨length, fun i => ?_⟩
by_cases hi : i = length
· subst i; simp [hl]
· have hf : selector bits i = false := by
cases hbi : selector bits i
· rfl
· exact False.elim (hi (hu i length hbi hl))
simp [hi, hf]
def selectedLength {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) : Nat :=
∑ i : Fin (q + 1), if selector bits i then i.val else 0
theorem selectedLength_eq {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) (length : Fin (q + 1))
(h : ∀ i, selector bits i = decide (i = length)) :
selectedLength bits = length.val := by
simp [selectedLength, h]
def decode {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) : List Bool :=
(List.ofFn (payload bits)).take (selectedLength bits)
theorem decode_length_le {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) : (decode bits).length ≤ q := by
simp [decode]
theorem decode_length_eq {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) (length : Fin (q + 1))
(h : ∀ i, selector bits i = decide (i = length)) :
(decode bits).length = length.val := by
simp [decode, selectedLength_eq bits length h, Nat.min_eq_left (by omega : length.val ≤ q)]
def encode (q : Nat) (witness : List Bool) (h : witness.length ≤ q) : Bits q :=
pack (fun i => decide (i = ⟨witness.length, by omega⟩))
(fun i => witness[i.val]?.getD false)
@[simp] theorem selector_encode (q : Nat) (witness : List Bool)
(h : witness.length ≤ q) (i : Fin (q + 1)) :
selector (encode q witness h) i =
decide (i = ⟨witness.length, by omega⟩) := by
simp [encode]
@[simp] theorem payload_encode (q : Nat) (witness : List Bool)
(h : witness.length ≤ q) (i : Fin q) :
payload (encode q witness h) i = witness[i.val]?.getD false := by
simp [encode]
theorem encode_valid (q : Nat) (witness : List Bool) (h : witness.length ≤ q) :
Valid (encode q witness h) :=
⟨⟨witness.length, by omega⟩, selector_encode q witness h⟩
@[simp] theorem selectedLength_encode (q : Nat) (witness : List Bool)
(h : witness.length ≤ q) : selectedLength (encode q witness h) = witness.length :=
selectedLength_eq _ ⟨witness.length, by omega⟩ (selector_encode q witness h)
@[simp] theorem decode_encode (q : Nat) (witness : List Bool) (h : witness.length ≤ q) :
decode (encode q witness h) = witness := by
unfold decode
rw [selectedLength_encode]
apply List.ext_getElem?
intro n
by_cases hn : n < witness.length
· have hnq : n < q := Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hn h
simp [hn, hnq]
· simp [hn]
theorem exists_valid_iff (q : Nat) (P : List Bool → Prop) :
(∃ bits : Bits q, Valid bits ∧ P (decode bits)) ↔
∃ witness : List Bool, witness.length ≤ q ∧ P witness := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨bits, _, hp⟩
exact ⟨decode bits, decode_length_le bits, hp⟩
· rintro ⟨witness, h, hp⟩
exact ⟨encode q witness h, encode_valid q witness h, by simpa using hp⟩
def present {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) (n : Nat) : Bool :=
decide (∃ length : Fin (q + 1), selector bits length = true ∧ n < length.val)
theorem present_eq {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) (length : Fin (q + 1))
(h : ∀ i, selector bits i = decide (i = length)) (n : Nat) :
present bits n = decide (n < length.val) := by
simp [present, h]
def witnessCell {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) (n : Nat) : Option Bool :=
if h : n < q then
if present bits n then some (payload bits ⟨n, h⟩) else none
else none
theorem witnessCell_eq_getElem? {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) (hv : Valid bits) (n : Nat) :
witnessCell bits n = (decode bits)[n]? := by
obtain ⟨length, h⟩ := hv
simp only [witnessCell, decode, selectedLength_eq bits length h,
present_eq bits length h, List.getElem?_take, List.getElem?_ofFn]
by_cases hnq : n < q <;> by_cases hnl : n < length.val <;> simp [hnq, hnl]
theorem witnessCell_end {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) (hv : Valid bits)
(n : Nat) (hn : (decode bits).length ≤ n) : witnessCell bits n = none := by
rw [witnessCell_eq_getElem? bits hv, List.getElem?_eq_none hn]
def inputPrefix (input : List Bool) : List Bool := encodeWord input.length ++ input
@[simp] theorem inputPrefix_length (input : List Bool) :
(inputPrefix input).length = 2 * input.length + 1 := by
simp only [inputPrefix, List.length_append, encodeWord_length]
omega
def pairCell {q : Nat} (input : List Bool) (bits : Bits q) (n : Nat) : Option Bool :=
if n < (inputPrefix input).length then (inputPrefix input)[n]?
else witnessCell bits (n - (inputPrefix input).length)
theorem pairCell_eq_getElem? {q : Nat} (input : List Bool) (bits : Bits q)
(hv : Valid bits) (n : Nat) :
pairCell input bits n = (pairBits (input, decode bits))[n]? := by
rw [pairBits]
change pairCell input bits n = (inputPrefix input ++ decode bits)[n]?
rw [List.getElem?_append]
simp only [pairCell, witnessCell_eq_getElem? bits hv]
theorem pairBits_decode_length_le {q : Nat} (input : List Bool) (bits : Bits q) :
(pairBits (input, decode bits)).length ≤ 2 * input.length + q + 1 := by
rw [pairBits_length]
change 2 * input.length + (decode bits).length + 1 ≤ 2 * input.length + q + 1
have h := decode_length_le bits
omega
theorem pairCells_eq_stackEncoding {q : Nat} (input : List Bool) (bits : Bits q)
(hv : Valid bits) (capacity : Nat) :
(fun i : Fin capacity => pairCell input bits i.val) =
StackEncoding.encode capacity (pairBits (input, decode bits)) := by
funext i
exact pairCell_eq_getElem? input bits hv i.val
noncomputable def freeInputPolynomial (q : Polynomial Nat) : Polynomial Nat := 2 * q + 1
@[simp] theorem freeInputPolynomial_eval (q : Polynomial Nat) (n : Nat) :
(freeInputPolynomial q).eval n = 2 * q.eval n + 1 := by
simp [freeInputPolynomial]
def localConstraintSites (q : Nat) : Nat := (q + 1) + (q + 1) ^ 2 + q * (q + 1)
theorem localConstraintSites_le (q : Nat) : localConstraintSites q ≤ 3 * (q + 1) ^ 2 := by
unfold localConstraintSites
nlinarith
noncomputable def localConstraintPolynomial (q : Polynomial Nat) : Polynomial Nat := 3 * (q + 1) ^ 2
theorem localConstraintSites_le_eval (q : Polynomial Nat) (n : Nat) :
localConstraintSites (q.eval n) ≤ (localConstraintPolynomial q).eval n := by
simpa [localConstraintPolynomial] using localConstraintSites_le (q.eval n)
variable (verifier : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool)
def initial (bits : Bits (verifier.witnessBound.eval input.length)) :
verifier.computation.tm.Cfg :=
Turing.initList verifier.computation.tm
((pairBits (input, decode bits)).map verifier.computation.inputAlphabet.invFun)
@[simp] theorem initial_control (bits : Bits (verifier.witnessBound.eval input.length)) :
(initial verifier input bits).l = some verifier.computation.tm.main := rfl
@[simp] theorem initial_state (bits : Bits (verifier.witnessBound.eval input.length)) :
(initial verifier input bits).var = verifier.computation.tm.initialState := rfl
@[simp] theorem initial_input_stack (bits : Bits (verifier.witnessBound.eval input.length)) :
(initial verifier input bits).stk verifier.computation.tm.k₀ =
(pairBits (input, decode bits)).map verifier.computation.inputAlphabet.invFun := by
simp [initial, Turing.initList]
theorem initial_other_stack (bits : Bits (verifier.witnessBound.eval input.length))
(k : verifier.computation.tm.K) (hk : k ≠ verifier.computation.tm.k₀) :
(initial verifier input bits).stk k = [] := by
simp [initial, Turing.initList, hk]
theorem initial_input_cell (bits : Bits (verifier.witnessBound.eval input.length))
(hv : Valid bits) (n : Nat) :
((initial verifier input bits).stk verifier.computation.tm.k₀)[n]? =
(pairCell input bits n).map verifier.computation.inputAlphabet.invFun := by
rw [initial_input_stack, List.getElem?_map, pairCell_eq_getElem? input bits hv]
theorem initial_input_end (bits : Bits (verifier.witnessBound.eval input.length))
(n : Nat) (hn : 2 * input.length + (decode bits).length + 1 ≤ n) :
((initial verifier input bits).stk verifier.computation.tm.k₀)[n]? = none := by
rw [initial_input_stack]
apply List.getElem?_eq_none
simpa only [List.length_map, pairBits_length] using hn
theorem initial_stack_length_le (bits : Bits (verifier.witnessBound.eval input.length))
(k : verifier.computation.tm.K) :
((initial verifier input bits).stk k).length ≤
2 * input.length + verifier.witnessBound.eval input.length + 1 := by
by_cases hk : k = verifier.computation.tm.k₀
· subst k
rw [initial_input_stack, List.length_map]
exact pairBits_decode_length_le input bits
· rw [initial_other_stack verifier input bits k hk]
simp
theorem initial_encode (witness : List Bool)
(h : witness.length ≤ verifier.witnessBound.eval input.length) :
initial verifier input (encode _ witness h) =
Turing.initList verifier.computation.tm
((pairBits (input, witness)).map verifier.computation.inputAlphabet.invFun) := by
simp [initial]
theorem accepts_iff_valid_assignment :
verifier.Accepts input ↔
∃ bits : Bits (verifier.witnessBound.eval input.length),
Valid bits ∧ verifier.verify (input, decode bits) = true := by
exact (exists_valid_iff _ (fun witness => verifier.verify (input, witness) = true)).symm
end BinPackingGames.Foundations.Complexity.CookLevin.WitnessEncoding
namespace BinPackingGames.Foundations.Complexity.CookLevin.WitnessCircuit
open StatementCircuit WitnessEncoding
private theorem bool_ext {a b : Bool} (h : a = true ↔ b = true) : a = b := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> simp_all
private theorem eval_disjoin_ofFn_true {ι : Type*} {n : Nat}
(input : ι → Bool) (es : Fin n → Expr ι) :
(Expr.disjoin (List.ofFn es)).eval input = true ↔ ∃ i, (es i).eval input = true := by
rw [Expr.eval_disjoin_true]
constructor
· rintro ⟨e, he, h⟩
obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := List.mem_ofFn.mp he
exact ⟨i, h⟩
· rintro ⟨i, h⟩
exact ⟨es i, List.mem_ofFn.mpr ⟨i, rfl⟩, h⟩
def selectorExpr (q : Nat) (i : Fin (q + 1)) : Expr (Fin (2 * q + 1)) :=
.input ⟨i.val, by omega⟩
def payloadExpr (q : Nat) (i : Fin q) : Expr (Fin (2 * q + 1)) :=
.input ⟨q + 1 + i.val, by omega⟩
@[simp] theorem eval_selectorExpr {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) (i : Fin (q + 1)) :
(selectorExpr q i).eval bits = selector bits i := rfl
@[simp] theorem eval_payloadExpr {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) (i : Fin q) :
(payloadExpr q i).eval bits = payload bits i := rfl
def nonemptyExpr (q : Nat) : Expr (Fin (2 * q + 1)) :=
.disjoin (List.ofFn (selectorExpr q))
def clashPairExpr (q : Nat) (i j : Fin (q + 1)) : Expr (Fin (2 * q + 1)) :=
if i = j then .const false else .and (selectorExpr q i) (selectorExpr q j)
def clashExpr (q : Nat) : Expr (Fin (2 * q + 1)) :=
.disjoin (List.ofFn fun i => .disjoin (List.ofFn (clashPairExpr q i)))
def validityExpr (q : Nat) : Expr (Fin (2 * q + 1)) :=
.and (nonemptyExpr q) (.not (clashExpr q))
theorem eval_nonemptyExpr {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) :
(nonemptyExpr q).eval bits = true ↔ ∃ i, selector bits i = true := by
simp only [nonemptyExpr, eval_disjoin_ofFn_true, eval_selectorExpr]
theorem eval_clashPairExpr {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) (i j : Fin (q + 1)) :
(clashPairExpr q i j).eval bits = true ↔
i ≠ j ∧ selector bits i = true ∧ selector bits j = true := by
by_cases h : i = j <;> simp [clashPairExpr, h, Expr.eval]
theorem eval_clashExpr {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) :
(clashExpr q).eval bits = true ↔
∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ selector bits i = true ∧ selector bits j = true := by
simp only [clashExpr, eval_disjoin_ofFn_true, eval_clashPairExpr]
theorem eval_validityExpr {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) :
(validityExpr q).eval bits = true ↔ Valid bits := by
rw [valid_iff_local]
simp only [validityExpr, Expr.eval, Bool.and_eq_true, Bool.not_eq_true']
rw [eval_nonemptyExpr]
have hc := eval_clashExpr bits
constructor
· rintro ⟨hne, hclash⟩
refine ⟨hne, fun i j hi hj => ?_⟩
by_contra hij
have ht := hc.mpr ⟨i, j, hij, hi, hj⟩
simp [hclash] at ht
· rintro ⟨hne, hu⟩
refine ⟨hne, ?_⟩
cases hb : (clashExpr q).eval bits
· rfl
· obtain ⟨i, j, hij, hi, hj⟩ := hc.mp hb
exact False.elim (hij (hu i j hi hj))
def presenceExpr (q n : Nat) : Expr (Fin (2 * q + 1)) :=
.disjoin (List.ofFn fun length : Fin (q + 1) =>
.and (selectorExpr q length) (.const (decide (n < length.val))))
theorem eval_presenceExpr {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) (n : Nat) :
(presenceExpr q n).eval bits = present bits n := by
apply bool_ext
simp only [presenceExpr, eval_disjoin_ofFn_true, Expr.eval, eval_selectorExpr,
Bool.and_eq_true, present, decide_eq_true_eq]
section Symbols
variable {A : Type*} [DecidableEq A]
def payloadSymbolExpr (q : Nat) (f : Bool → A) (i : Fin q) (a : Option A) :
Expr (Fin (2 * q + 1)) :=
.mux (payloadExpr q i)
(.const (decide (some (f true) = a))) (.const (decide (some (f false) = a)))
theorem eval_payloadSymbolExpr {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) (f : Bool → A)
(i : Fin q) (a : Option A) :
(payloadSymbolExpr q f i a).eval bits = decide (some (f (payload bits i)) = a) := by
rw [payloadSymbolExpr, Expr.eval_mux, eval_payloadExpr]
cases payload bits i <;> simp [Expr.eval]
def inputCellExpr (q : Nat) (input : List Bool) (f : Bool → A) (n : Nat) (a : Option A) :
Expr (Fin (2 * q + 1)) :=
if n < (inputPrefix input).length then
.const (decide (((inputPrefix input)[n]?).map f = a))
else if h : n - (inputPrefix input).length < q then
.mux (presenceExpr q (n - (inputPrefix input).length))
(payloadSymbolExpr q f ⟨n - (inputPrefix input).length, h⟩ a)
(.const (decide ((none : Option A) = a)))
else .const (decide ((none : Option A) = a))
theorem eval_inputCellExpr {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) (input : List Bool)
(f : Bool → A) (n : Nat) (a : Option A) :
(inputCellExpr q input f n a).eval bits = decide ((pairCell input bits n).map f = a) := by
by_cases hp : n < (inputPrefix input).length
· simp only [inputCellExpr, pairCell, ite_eq_left hp, Expr.eval]
· by_cases hq : n - (inputPrefix input).length < q
· simp only [inputCellExpr, hp, ite_false, hq, dite_eq_left, Expr.eval_mux,
eval_presenceExpr, eval_payloadSymbolExpr, Expr.eval, pairCell, witnessCell]
cases present bits (n - (inputPrefix input).length) <;> simp
· simp only [inputCellExpr, pairCell, witnessCell, ite_eq_right hp, dite_eq_right hq,
Expr.eval, Option.map_none]
end Symbols
section Size
@[simp] theorem size_selectorExpr (q : Nat) (i : Fin (q + 1)) :
(selectorExpr q i).size = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem size_payloadExpr (q : Nat) (i : Fin q) :
(payloadExpr q i).size = 1 := rfl
theorem size_mux {ι : Type*} (c y n : Expr ι) :
(Expr.mux c y n).size = 2 * c.size + y.size + n.size + 4 := by
simp only [Expr.mux, Expr.size]
omega
theorem size_nonemptyExpr_le (q : Nat) :
(nonemptyExpr q).size ≤ 2 * (q + 1) + 1 := by
have h := Expr.size_disjoin_le (List.ofFn (selectorExpr q)) 1 (by
intro e he
obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := List.mem_ofFn.mp he
simp)
simpa [nonemptyExpr, Nat.mul_comm] using h
theorem size_clashPairExpr_le (q : Nat) (i j : Fin (q + 1)) :
(clashPairExpr q i j).size ≤ 3 := by
by_cases h : i = j <;> simp [clashPairExpr, h, Expr.size, selectorExpr]
theorem size_clashExpr_le (q : Nat) :
(clashExpr q).size ≤ (q + 1) * (4 * (q + 1) + 2) + 1 := by
have hi (i : Fin (q + 1)) :
(Expr.disjoin (List.ofFn (clashPairExpr q i))).size ≤ 4 * (q + 1) + 1 := by
have h := Expr.size_disjoin_le (List.ofFn (clashPairExpr q i)) 3 (by
intro e he
obtain ⟨j, rfl⟩ := List.mem_ofFn.mp he
exact size_clashPairExpr_le q i j)
simpa [Nat.mul_comm] using h
have h := Expr.size_disjoin_le
(List.ofFn fun i => Expr.disjoin (List.ofFn (clashPairExpr q i)))
(4 * (q + 1) + 1) (by
intro e he
obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := List.mem_ofFn.mp he
exact hi i)
simpa [clashExpr, Nat.add_assoc] using h
theorem size_validityExpr_le (q : Nat) : (validityExpr q).size ≤ 12 * (q + 1) ^ 2 := by
have hn := size_nonemptyExpr_le q
have hc := size_clashExpr_le q
simp only [validityExpr, Expr.size]
nlinarith
theorem size_presenceExpr_le (q n : Nat) : (presenceExpr q n).size ≤ 4 * (q + 1) + 1 := by
have h := Expr.size_disjoin_le
(List.ofFn fun length : Fin (q + 1) =>
Expr.and (selectorExpr q length) (.const (decide (n < length.val)))) 3 (by
intro e he
obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := List.mem_ofFn.mp he
simp [Expr.size])
simpa [presenceExpr, Nat.mul_comm] using h
theorem size_payloadSymbolExpr {A : Type*} [DecidableEq A]
(q : Nat) (f : Bool → A) (i : Fin q) (a : Option A) :
(payloadSymbolExpr q f i a).size = 8 := by
simp [payloadSymbolExpr, size_mux, Expr.size]
theorem size_inputCellExpr_le {A : Type*} [DecidableEq A]
(q : Nat) (input : List Bool) (f : Bool → A) (n : Nat) (a : Option A) :
(inputCellExpr q input f n a).size ≤ 8 * (q + 1) + 15 := by
unfold inputCellExpr
split
· simp [Expr.size]
· split
· rw [size_mux, size_payloadSymbolExpr]
have h := size_presenceExpr_le q (n - (inputPrefix input).length)
simp only [Expr.size]
omega
· simp [Expr.size]
end Size
section Initial
variable (verifier : NPVerifier)
variable [DecidableEq verifier.computation.tm.Λ]
variable [DecidableEq verifier.computation.tm.σ]
variable [∀ k, DecidableEq (verifier.computation.tm.Γ k)]
def initialCellExpr (input : List Bool) (S : Nat)
(k : verifier.computation.tm.K) (i : Fin S) (a : Option (verifier.computation.tm.Γ k)) :
Expr (Fin (2 * verifier.witnessBound.eval input.length + 1)) :=
if h : k = verifier.computation.tm.k₀ then by
subst k
exact inputCellExpr _ input verifier.computation.inputAlphabet.invFun i.val a
else .const (decide ((none : Option (verifier.computation.tm.Γ k)) = a))
omit [DecidableEq verifier.computation.tm.Λ] [DecidableEq verifier.computation.tm.σ] in
theorem eval_initialCellExpr (input : List Bool) (S : Nat)
(bits : Bits (verifier.witnessBound.eval input.length)) (hv : Valid bits)
(k : verifier.computation.tm.K) (i : Fin S) (a : Option (verifier.computation.tm.Γ k)) :
(initialCellExpr verifier input S k i a).eval bits =
decide (StackEncoding.encode S ((initial verifier input bits).stk k) i = a) := by
by_cases hk : k = verifier.computation.tm.k₀
· subst k
simpa [initialCellExpr, StackEncoding.encode,
pairCell_eq_getElem? input bits hv i.val] using
eval_inputCellExpr bits input verifier.computation.inputAlphabet.invFun i.val a
· simp [initialCellExpr, hk, initial_other_stack verifier input bits k hk,
StackEncoding.encode, Expr.eval]
def initExpr (input : List Bool) (S : Nat) :
ConfigBit verifier.computation.tm.Γ verifier.computation.tm.Λ verifier.computation.tm.σ S →
Expr (Fin (2 * verifier.witnessBound.eval input.length + 1))
| .inl label => .const (decide (some verifier.computation.tm.main = label))
| .inr (.inl state) => .const (decide (verifier.computation.tm.initialState = state))
| .inr (.inr ⟨k, i, a⟩) => initialCellExpr verifier input S k i a
theorem eval_initExpr (input : List Bool) (S : Nat)
(bits : Bits (verifier.witnessBound.eval input.length)) (hv : Valid bits)
(bit : ConfigBit verifier.computation.tm.Γ verifier.computation.tm.Λ
verifier.computation.tm.σ S) :
(initExpr verifier input S bit).eval bits =
configEncoding S (initial verifier input bits) bit := by
rcases bit with label | (state | ⟨k, i, a⟩)
· rfl
· rfl
· exact eval_initialCellExpr verifier input S bits hv k i a
omit [DecidableEq verifier.computation.tm.Λ] [DecidableEq verifier.computation.tm.σ] in
theorem size_initialCellExpr_le (input : List Bool) (S : Nat)
(k : verifier.computation.tm.K) (i : Fin S) (a : Option (verifier.computation.tm.Γ k)) :
(initialCellExpr verifier input S k i a).size ≤
8 * (verifier.witnessBound.eval input.length + 1) + 15 := by
by_cases hk : k = verifier.computation.tm.k₀
· subst k
simpa [initialCellExpr] using
size_inputCellExpr_le (verifier.witnessBound.eval input.length) input
verifier.computation.inputAlphabet.invFun i.val a
· simp [initialCellExpr, hk, Expr.size]
theorem size_initExpr_le (input : List Bool) (S : Nat)
(bit : ConfigBit verifier.computation.tm.Γ verifier.computation.tm.Λ
verifier.computation.tm.σ S) :
(initExpr verifier input S bit).size ≤
8 * (verifier.witnessBound.eval input.length + 1) + 15 := by
rcases bit with label | (state | ⟨k, i, a⟩)
· simp [initExpr, Expr.size]
· simp [initExpr, Expr.size]
· exact size_initialCellExpr_le verifier input S k i a
end Initial
def validityCircuit (q : Nat) : Circuit := (validityExpr q).circuit id
theorem validityCircuit_eval {q : Nat} (bits : Bits q) :
(validityCircuit q).eval bits = true ↔ Valid bits := by
change ((validityExpr q).circuit id).eval bits = true ↔ Valid bits
rw [Expr.circuit_eval]
exact eval_validityExpr bits
theorem validityCircuit_gates_le (q : Nat) :
(validityCircuit q).gates.length ≤ 12 * (q + 1) ^ 2 := by
simpa only [validityCircuit, Expr.circuit, Expr.gates_length] using size_validityExpr_le q
end BinPackingGames.Foundations.Complexity.CookLevin.WitnessCircuit
namespace BinPackingGames.Foundations.Complexity.CookLevin.VerifierBounds
open Polynomial
def initializationPolynomial (q : Polynomial ℕ) : Polynomial ℕ :=
C 8 * (q + 1) + C 15
def validationPolynomial (q : Polynomial ℕ) : Polynomial ℕ :=
C 12 * (q + 1) ^ 2
@[simp] theorem initializationPolynomial_eval (q : Polynomial ℕ) (n : ℕ) :
(initializationPolynomial q).eval n = 8 * (q.eval n + 1) + 15 := by
simp [initializationPolynomial]
@[simp] theorem validationPolynomial_eval (q : Polynomial ℕ) (n : ℕ) :
(validationPolynomial q).eval n = 12 * (q.eval n + 1) ^ 2 := by
simp [validationPolynomial]
def gatesPolynomial (p q : Polynomial ℕ)
(pushes controlBits alphabetBits expressionCost : ℕ)
(initialization validation : Polynomial ℕ) : Polynomial ℕ :=
let W := Bounds.configurationWidthPolynomial p q pushes controlBits alphabetBits
W * initialization + validation +
Bounds.horizonPolynomial p q * ((W + 1) * C expressionCost) +
(C 3 * W + C 4)
@[simp] theorem gatesPolynomial_eval (p q : Polynomial ℕ)
(pushes controlBits alphabetBits expressionCost : ℕ)
(initialization validation : Polynomial ℕ) (n : ℕ) :
(gatesPolynomial p q pushes controlBits alphabetBits expressionCost initialization validation).eval n =
(Bounds.configurationWidthPolynomial p q pushes controlBits alphabetBits).eval n *
initialization.eval n + validation.eval n +
(Bounds.horizonPolynomial p q).eval n *
(((Bounds.configurationWidthPolynomial p q pushes controlBits alphabetBits).eval n + 1) *
expressionCost) +
(3 * (Bounds.configurationWidthPolynomial p q pushes controlBits alphabetBits).eval n + 4) := by
simp [gatesPolynomial]
def bitsPolynomial (p q : Polynomial ℕ)
(pushes controlBits alphabetBits expressionCost : ℕ)
(initialization validation : Polynomial ℕ) : Polynomial ℕ :=
Bounds.circuitBitsPolynomial (WitnessEncoding.freeInputPolynomial q)
(gatesPolynomial p q pushes controlBits alphabetBits expressionCost initialization validation)
def machineGatesPolynomial (p q : Polynomial ℕ)
(pushes controlBits alphabetBits expressionCost : ℕ) : Polynomial ℕ :=
gatesPolynomial p q pushes controlBits alphabetBits expressionCost
(initializationPolynomial q) (validationPolynomial q)
def machineBitsPolynomial (p q : Polynomial ℕ)
(pushes controlBits alphabetBits expressionCost : ℕ) : Polynomial ℕ :=
bitsPolynomial p q pushes controlBits alphabetBits expressionCost
(initializationPolynomial q) (validationPolynomial q)
@[simp] theorem machineGatesPolynomial_eval (p q : Polynomial ℕ)
(pushes controlBits alphabetBits expressionCost n : ℕ) :
(machineGatesPolynomial p q pushes controlBits alphabetBits expressionCost).eval n =
(Bounds.configurationWidthPolynomial p q pushes controlBits alphabetBits).eval n *
(8 * (q.eval n + 1) + 15) + 12 * (q.eval n + 1) ^ 2 +
(Bounds.horizonPolynomial p q).eval n *
(((Bounds.configurationWidthPolynomial p q pushes controlBits alphabetBits).eval n + 1) *
expressionCost) +
(3 * (Bounds.configurationWidthPolynomial p q pushes controlBits alphabetBits).eval n + 4) := by
simp only [machineGatesPolynomial, gatesPolynomial_eval,
initializationPolynomial_eval, validationPolynomial_eval]
theorem toFormula_bits_le (circuit : Circuit) (p q : Polynomial ℕ)
(pushes controlBits alphabetBits expressionCost : ℕ)
(initialization validation : Polynomial ℕ) (n : ℕ)
(hi : circuit.inputs ≤ 2 * q.eval n + 1)
(hg : circuit.gates.length ≤
(Bounds.configurationWidthPolynomial p q pushes controlBits alphabetBits).eval n *
initialization.eval n + validation.eval n +
(Bounds.horizonPolynomial p q).eval n *
(((Bounds.configurationWidthPolynomial p q pushes controlBits alphabetBits).eval n + 1) *
expressionCost) +
(3 * (Bounds.configurationWidthPolynomial p q pushes controlBits alphabetBits).eval n + 4)) :
(formulaBits circuit.toFormula).length ≤
(bitsPolynomial p q pushes controlBits alphabetBits expressionCost initialization validation).eval n := by
apply Bounds.toFormula_bits_length_le_polynomial
· simpa only [WitnessEncoding.freeInputPolynomial_eval] using hi
· simpa only [gatesPolynomial_eval] using hg
theorem toFormula_bits_le_machinePolynomial (circuit : Circuit) (p q : Polynomial ℕ)
(pushes controlBits alphabetBits expressionCost n : ℕ)
(hi : circuit.inputs ≤ 2 * q.eval n + 1)
(hg : circuit.gates.length ≤
(machineGatesPolynomial p q pushes controlBits alphabetBits expressionCost).eval n) :
(formulaBits circuit.toFormula).length ≤
(machineBitsPolynomial p q pushes controlBits alphabetBits expressionCost).eval n := by
apply Bounds.toFormula_bits_length_le_polynomial
· simpa only [WitnessEncoding.freeInputPolynomial_eval] using hi
· exact hg
end BinPackingGames.Foundations.Complexity.CookLevin.VerifierBounds
namespace BinPackingGames.Foundations.Complexity.CookLevin.VerifierCircuit
open Turing StatementCircuit CircuitBatch
open scoped BigOperators
local instance alphabetFinite (V : NPVerifier) : ∀ k, Fintype (V.computation.tm.Γ k) :=
V.finiteAlphabet
local instance labelFinite (V : NPVerifier) : Fintype V.computation.tm.Λ :=
V.computation.tm.ΛFin
local instance stateFinite (V : NPVerifier) : Fintype V.computation.tm.σ :=
V.computation.tm.σFin
local instance labelDecidable (V : NPVerifier) : DecidableEq V.computation.tm.Λ :=
Classical.decEq _
local instance stateDecidable (V : NPVerifier) : DecidableEq V.computation.tm.σ :=
Classical.decEq _
local instance alphabetDecidable (V : NPVerifier) : ∀ k, DecidableEq (V.computation.tm.Γ k) :=
fun _ => Classical.decEq _
def capacity (V : NPVerifier) (n : Nat) : Nat :=
2 * n + V.witnessBound.eval n + 1 + V.horizon n * Runtime.programPushBound V.computation.tm
theorem capacity_pos (V : NPVerifier) (n : Nat) : 1 ≤ capacity V n := by
unfold capacity
omega
abbrev FreeBits (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) :=
WitnessEncoding.Bits (V.witnessBound.eval input.length)
def machineInput (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) (bits : FreeBits V input) :=
(pairBits (input, WitnessEncoding.decode bits)).map V.computation.inputAlphabet.invFun
def actualRun (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) (bits : FreeBits V input) (t : Nat) :
V.computation.tm.Cfg := BoundedExecution.run V.computation.tm (machineInput V input bits) t
def accepting (V : NPVerifier) : V.computation.tm.Cfg :=
haltList V.computation.tm ([true].map V.computation.outputAlphabet.invFun)
theorem stackCapacity_le (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) (bits : FreeBits V input) :
BoundedExecution.stackCapacity V.computation.tm (machineInput V input bits)
(V.horizon input.length) ≤ capacity V input.length := by
have h := WitnessEncoding.pairBits_decode_length_le input bits
simp only [BoundedExecution.stackCapacity, machineInput, List.length_map, capacity]
omega
theorem actualRun_stack_le (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) (bits : FreeBits V input)
(t : Nat) (ht : t ≤ V.horizon input.length) (k : V.computation.tm.K) :
((actualRun V input bits t).stk k).length ≤ capacity V input.length :=
(BoundedExecution.run_stack_le V.computation.tm (machineInput V input bits)
(V.horizon input.length) t ht k).trans (stackCapacity_le V input bits)
theorem actualRun_stepSafe (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) (bits : FreeBits V input)
(t : Nat) (ht : t < V.horizon input.length) :
MachineCircuit.StepSafe (capacity V input.length) V.computation.tm.m
(actualRun V input bits t) := by
intro label _
apply BoundedExecution.statementSafe_of_budget
intro k
exact (BoundedExecution.statement_budget V.computation.tm (machineInput V input bits)
(V.horizon input.length) t ht label k).trans (stackCapacity_le V input bits)
theorem accepting_stack_le (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) (k : V.computation.tm.K) :
((accepting V).stk k).length ≤ capacity V input.length := by
by_cases hk : k = V.computation.tm.k₁
· subst k
simpa [accepting, haltList] using capacity_pos V input.length
· simp [accepting, haltList, hk]
theorem actualRun_accepting_iff (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) (bits : FreeBits V input) :
actualRun V input bits (V.horizon input.length) = accepting V ↔
V.verify (input, WitnessEncoding.decode bits) = true := by
have hr := BoundedExecution.run_eq_halt_of_outputs V.computation.tm
(machineInput V input bits)
([V.verify (input, WitnessEncoding.decode bits)].map V.computation.outputAlphabet.invFun)
(V.horizon input.length)
(V.runWithinHorizon input (WitnessEncoding.decode bits) (WitnessEncoding.decode_length_le bits))
change actualRun V input bits (V.horizon input.length) = _ at hr
rw [hr]
constructor
· intro h
have hs := congrArg (fun c : V.computation.tm.Cfg => c.stk V.computation.tm.k₁) h
have he : V.computation.outputAlphabet.invFun (V.verify (input, WitnessEncoding.decode bits)) =
V.computation.outputAlphabet.invFun true := by
simpa [accepting, haltList] using hs
exact V.computation.outputAlphabet.symm.injective he
· intro h
simp [h, accepting]
abbrev Bit (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) :=
ConfigBit V.computation.tm.Γ V.computation.tm.Λ V.computation.tm.σ (capacity V input.length)
def indexing (V : NPVerifier) :
ConfigIndex.Indexing V.computation.tm.Γ V.computation.tm.Λ V.computation.tm.σ :=
ConfigIndex.ofMachine V.computation.tm
abbrev width (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) : Nat :=
(indexing V).width (capacity V input.length)
def bitEquiv (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) : Bit V input ≃ Fin (width V input) :=
(indexing V).configIndexEquiv (capacity V input.length)
def bitWire (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) (b : Bit V input) : Fin (width V input + 1) :=
(bitEquiv V input b).castSucc
def stateEncoding (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) (cfg : V.computation.tm.Cfg)
(valid : Bool) : Fin (width V input + 1) → Bool :=
Fin.lastCases valid (fun j => configEncoding (capacity V input.length) cfg
((bitEquiv V input).symm j))
@[simp] theorem stateEncoding_last (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool)
(cfg : V.computation.tm.Cfg) (valid : Bool) :
stateEncoding V input cfg valid (Fin.last (width V input)) = valid := by
simp [stateEncoding]
@[simp] theorem stateEncoding_bitWire (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool)
(cfg : V.computation.tm.Cfg) (valid : Bool) (b : Bit V input) :
stateEncoding V input cfg valid (bitWire V input b) =
configEncoding (capacity V input.length) cfg b := by
simp [stateEncoding, bitWire]
def initialExpressions (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) :
Fin (width V input + 1) → Expr (Fin (2 * V.witnessBound.eval input.length + 1)) :=
Fin.lastCases (WitnessCircuit.validityExpr (V.witnessBound.eval input.length))
(fun j => WitnessCircuit.initExpr V input (capacity V input.length)
((bitEquiv V input).symm j))
def stepExpressions (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) :
Fin (width V input + 1) → Expr (Fin (width V input + 1)) :=
Fin.lastCases (.input (Fin.last (width V input)))
(fun j => (MachineCircuit.stickyExpr (capacity V input.length) V.computation.tm.m
((bitEquiv V input).symm j)).rename (bitWire V input))
theorem initialExpressions_eval (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) (bits : FreeBits V input)
(hv : WitnessEncoding.Valid bits) :
(fun j => (initialExpressions V input j).eval bits) =
stateEncoding V input (WitnessEncoding.initial V input bits)
((WitnessCircuit.validityExpr _).eval bits) := by
funext j
refine Fin.lastCases ?_ (fun i => ?_) j
· simp [initialExpressions, stateEncoding]
· simpa [initialExpressions, stateEncoding] using
WitnessCircuit.eval_initExpr V input (capacity V input.length) bits hv
((bitEquiv V input).symm i)
theorem stepExpressions_eval (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) (cfg : V.computation.tm.Cfg)
(safe : MachineCircuit.StepSafe (capacity V input.length) V.computation.tm.m cfg)
(valid : Bool) :
Frame.network (stepExpressions V input) (stateEncoding V input cfg valid) =
stateEncoding V input (BoundedExecution.stickyNext V.computation.tm cfg) valid := by
funext j
refine Fin.lastCases ?_ (fun i => ?_) j
· simp [Frame.network, stepExpressions, Expr.eval, stateEncoding]
· simp only [Frame.network, stepExpressions, Fin.lastCases_castSucc, Expr.eval_rename]
have he : (fun b => stateEncoding V input cfg valid (bitWire V input b)) =
configEncoding (capacity V input.length) cfg := by funext b; simp
rw [he, MachineCircuit.stickyExpr_eval _ _ cfg safe]
simp only [stateEncoding, Fin.lastCases_castSucc]
rfl
def initialFrame (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) :
Frame (2 * V.witnessBound.eval input.length + 1) (width V input + 1) :=
(Frame.initial id).step (initialExpressions V input)
def timeFrame (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) (t : Nat) :
Frame (2 * V.witnessBound.eval input.length + 1) (width V input + 1) :=
(initialFrame V input).repeat (stepExpressions V input) t
theorem initialFrame_eval (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) (bits : FreeBits V input)
(hv : WitnessEncoding.Valid bits) :
(initialFrame V input).eval bits = stateEncoding V input
(WitnessEncoding.initial V input bits) ((WitnessCircuit.validityExpr _).eval bits) := by
rw [initialFrame, Frame.step_eval_fun]
have hi : (Frame.initial id).eval bits = bits := by funext i; simp
rw [hi]
exact initialExpressions_eval V input bits hv
theorem timeFrame_validity (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) (bits : FreeBits V input)
(t : Nat) :
(timeFrame V input t).eval bits (Fin.last (width V input)) =
(WitnessCircuit.validityExpr (V.witnessBound.eval input.length)).eval bits := by
induction t with
| zero =>
simp only [timeFrame, Frame.repeat, initialFrame, Frame.step_eval,
initialExpressions, Fin.lastCases_last]
apply Expr.eval_congr
intro i
exact Frame.initial_eval id bits i
| succ t ih =>
simpa only [timeFrame, Frame.repeat, Frame.step_eval, stepExpressions,
Fin.lastCases_last, Expr.eval] using ih
theorem timeFrame_eval (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) (bits : FreeBits V input)
(hv : WitnessEncoding.Valid bits) (t : Nat) (ht : t ≤ V.horizon input.length) :
(timeFrame V input t).eval bits = stateEncoding V input (actualRun V input bits t)
((WitnessCircuit.validityExpr _).eval bits) := by
induction t with
| zero => exact initialFrame_eval V input bits hv
| succ t ih =>
have hprev := ih (by omega)
change ((timeFrame V input t).step (stepExpressions V input)).eval bits = _
rw [Frame.step_eval_fun, hprev]
have hs := stepExpressions_eval V input (actualRun V input bits t)
(actualRun_stepSafe V input bits t (by omega))
((WitnessCircuit.validityExpr _).eval bits)
change (fun i => (stepExpressions V input i).eval
(stateEncoding V input (actualRun V input bits t)
((WitnessCircuit.validityExpr _).eval bits))) = _ at hs
simpa only [actualRun, BoundedExecution.run_succ] using hs
def mismatchExpr (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) (j : Fin (width V input)) :
Expr (Fin (width V input + 1)) :=
if configEncoding (capacity V input.length) (accepting V) ((bitEquiv V input).symm j)
then .not (.input j.castSucc) else .input j.castSucc
def acceptanceExpr (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) : Expr (Fin (width V input + 1)) :=
.and (.input (Fin.last (width V input)))
(.not (Expr.disjoin (List.ofFn (mismatchExpr V input))))
theorem mismatchExpr_eval (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool)
(state : Fin (width V input + 1) → Bool) (j : Fin (width V input)) :
(mismatchExpr V input j).eval state = true ↔
state j.castSucc ≠ configEncoding (capacity V input.length) (accepting V)
((bitEquiv V input).symm j) := by
cases ht : configEncoding (capacity V input.length) (accepting V)
((bitEquiv V input).symm j) <;> cases hs : state j.castSucc <;>
simp [mismatchExpr, Expr.eval, ht, hs]
theorem acceptanceExpr_eval (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool)
(state : Fin (width V input + 1) → Bool) :
(acceptanceExpr V input).eval state = true ↔
state (Fin.last (width V input)) = true ∧
∀ j : Fin (width V input), state j.castSucc =
configEncoding (capacity V input.length) (accepting V) ((bitEquiv V input).symm j) := by
have hd : (Expr.disjoin (List.ofFn (mismatchExpr V input))).eval state = true ↔
∃ j : Fin (width V input), state j.castSucc ≠
configEncoding (capacity V input.length) (accepting V) ((bitEquiv V input).symm j) := by
rw [Expr.eval_disjoin_true]
constructor
· rintro ⟨e, he, hv⟩
obtain ⟨j, rfl⟩ := List.mem_ofFn.mp he
exact ⟨j, (mismatchExpr_eval V input state j).mp hv⟩
· rintro ⟨j, hj⟩
exact ⟨_, List.mem_ofFn.mpr ⟨j, rfl⟩, (mismatchExpr_eval V input state j).mpr hj⟩
have hz : (Expr.disjoin (List.ofFn (mismatchExpr V input))).eval state = false ↔
∀ j : Fin (width V input), state j.castSucc =
configEncoding (capacity V input.length) (accepting V) ((bitEquiv V input).symm j) := by
constructor
· intro h j
by_contra hj
have ht := hd.mpr ⟨j, hj⟩
rw [h] at ht
contradiction
· intro h
cases ht : (Expr.disjoin (List.ofFn (mismatchExpr V input))).eval state with
| false => rfl
| true =>
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := hd.mp ht
exact False.elim (hj (h j))
simp only [acceptanceExpr, Expr.eval, Bool.and_eq_true, Bool.not_eq_true_eq_eq_false]
exact and_congr_right (fun _ => hz)
theorem acceptanceExpr_stateEncoding (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool)
(cfg : V.computation.tm.Cfg) (valid : Bool)
(hcfg : ∀ k, (cfg.stk k).length ≤ capacity V input.length) :
(acceptanceExpr V input).eval (stateEncoding V input cfg valid) = true ↔
valid = true ∧ cfg = accepting V := by
rw [acceptanceExpr_eval]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hv, hbits⟩
refine ⟨by simpa using hv, ?_⟩
apply MachineCircuit.configEncoding_injective (capacity V input.length)
cfg (accepting V) hcfg (accepting_stack_le V input)
funext b
have h := hbits (bitEquiv V input b)
simpa [stateEncoding] using h
· rintro ⟨hv, rfl⟩
simp [stateEncoding, hv]
def circuitOfVerifier (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) : Circuit :=
((timeFrame V input (V.horizon input.length)).step
(fun _ : Fin 1 => acceptanceExpr V input)).toCircuit 0
@[simp] theorem circuitOfVerifier_inputs (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) :
(circuitOfVerifier V input).inputs = 2 * V.witnessBound.eval input.length + 1 := rfl
theorem circuitOfVerifier_eval (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) (bits : FreeBits V input) :
(circuitOfVerifier V input).eval bits =
(acceptanceExpr V input).eval ((timeFrame V input (V.horizon input.length)).eval bits) := by
change (((timeFrame V input (V.horizon input.length)).step
(fun _ : Fin 1 => acceptanceExpr V input)).toCircuit 0).eval bits = _
rw [Frame.toCircuit_eval, Frame.step_eval]
theorem circuitOfVerifier_accepts_iff (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool)
(bits : FreeBits V input) :
(circuitOfVerifier V input).eval bits = true ↔
WitnessEncoding.Valid bits ∧ V.verify (input, WitnessEncoding.decode bits) = true := by
rw [circuitOfVerifier_eval]
constructor
· intro h
have hvalid := ((acceptanceExpr_eval V input _).mp h).1
rw [timeFrame_validity] at hvalid
have hv : WitnessEncoding.Valid bits := (WitnessCircuit.eval_validityExpr bits).mp hvalid
rw [timeFrame_eval V input bits hv _ le_rfl] at h
have he := (acceptanceExpr_stateEncoding V input
(actualRun V input bits (V.horizon input.length)) _
(actualRun_stack_le V input bits _ le_rfl)).mp h
exact ⟨hv, (actualRun_accepting_iff V input bits).mp he.2⟩
· rintro ⟨hv, hverify⟩
rw [timeFrame_eval V input bits hv _ le_rfl]
apply (acceptanceExpr_stateEncoding V input
(actualRun V input bits (V.horizon input.length)) _
(actualRun_stack_le V input bits _ le_rfl)).mpr
exact ⟨(WitnessCircuit.eval_validityExpr bits).mpr hv,
(actualRun_accepting_iff V input bits).mpr hverify⟩
theorem circuitOfVerifier_correct (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) :
(circuitOfVerifier V input).toFormula.Satisfiable ↔ V.Accepts input := by
rw [Circuit.toFormula_satisfiable_iff_eval, WitnessEncoding.accepts_iff_valid_assignment]
change (∃ bits : FreeBits V input, (circuitOfVerifier V input).eval bits = true) ↔ _
exact exists_congr (fun bits => circuitOfVerifier_accepts_iff V input bits)
theorem mismatchExpr_size_le (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) (j : Fin (width V input)) :
(mismatchExpr V input j).size ≤ 2 := by
unfold mismatchExpr
split <;> simp [Expr.size]
theorem acceptanceExpr_size_le (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) :
(acceptanceExpr V input).size ≤ 3 * width V input + 4 := by
have h := Expr.size_disjoin_le (List.ofFn (mismatchExpr V input)) 2 (by
intro e he
obtain ⟨j, rfl⟩ := List.mem_ofFn.mp he
exact mismatchExpr_size_le V input j)
simp only [List.length_ofFn] at h
simp only [acceptanceExpr, Expr.size]
omega
theorem stepExpressions_size_le (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool)
(j : Fin (width V input + 1)) :
(stepExpressions V input j).size ≤ MachineCircuit.expressionCost V.computation.tm.m := by
refine Fin.lastCases ?_ (fun i => ?_) j
· simp only [stepExpressions, Fin.lastCases_last, Expr.size, MachineCircuit.expressionCost]
omega
· simpa [stepExpressions] using MachineCircuit.stickyExpr_size_le
(capacity V input.length) V.computation.tm.m ((bitEquiv V input).symm i)
theorem initialExpressions_cost_le (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) :
Batch.cost (List.ofFn (initialExpressions V input)) ≤
width V input * (8 * (V.witnessBound.eval input.length + 1) + 15) +
12 * (V.witnessBound.eval input.length + 1) ^ 2 := by
rw [Batch.cost_ofFn, Fin.sum_univ_castSucc]
simp only [initialExpressions, Fin.lastCases_castSucc, Fin.lastCases_last]
apply Nat.add_le_add
· calc
_ ≤ ∑ _ : Fin (width V input), (8 * (V.witnessBound.eval input.length + 1) + 15) := by
apply Finset.sum_le_sum
intro i _
exact WitnessCircuit.size_initExpr_le V input (capacity V input.length)
((bitEquiv V input).symm i)
_ = _ := by simp
· exact WitnessCircuit.size_validityExpr_le _
theorem circuitOfVerifier_gate_count (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) :
(circuitOfVerifier V input).gates.length =
Batch.cost (List.ofFn (initialExpressions V input)) +
V.horizon input.length * Batch.cost (List.ofFn (stepExpressions V input)) +
(acceptanceExpr V input).size := by
change ((timeFrame V input (V.horizon input.length)).step
(fun _ : Fin 1 => acceptanceExpr V input)).fragment.gates.length = _
rw [Frame.step_gate_count]
simp only [timeFrame, Frame.repeat_gate_count, initialFrame, Frame.step_gate_count,
Frame.initial, Fragment.empty, List.length_nil, Nat.zero_add]
have hsingle : Batch.cost (List.ofFn (fun _ : Fin 1 => acceptanceExpr V input)) =
(acceptanceExpr V input).size := by simp [Batch.cost]
rw [hsingle]
theorem circuitOfVerifier_gates_le (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) :
(circuitOfVerifier V input).gates.length ≤
width V input * (8 * (V.witnessBound.eval input.length + 1) + 15) +
12 * (V.witnessBound.eval input.length + 1) ^ 2 +
V.horizon input.length * ((width V input + 1) *
MachineCircuit.expressionCost V.computation.tm.m) + (3 * width V input + 4) := by
rw [circuitOfVerifier_gate_count]
exact Nat.add_le_add
(Nat.add_le_add (initialExpressions_cost_le V input)
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (Batch.cost_ofFn_le _ _ (stepExpressions_size_le V input))))
(acceptanceExpr_size_le V input)
def widthPolynomial (V : NPVerifier) : Polynomial Nat :=
Bounds.configurationWidthPolynomial V.computation.time V.witnessBound
(Runtime.programPushBound V.computation.tm)
((indexing V).labelCount + (indexing V).stateCount) (indexing V).symbolCount
theorem widthPolynomial_eval (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) :
(widthPolynomial V).eval input.length = width V input := by
simp [widthPolynomial, width, ConfigIndex.Indexing.width, capacity,
NPVerifier.horizon, Nat.mul_comm]
def gatePolynomial (V : NPVerifier) : Polynomial Nat :=
VerifierBounds.machineGatesPolynomial V.computation.time V.witnessBound
(Runtime.programPushBound V.computation.tm)
((indexing V).labelCount + (indexing V).stateCount) (indexing V).symbolCount
(MachineCircuit.expressionCost V.computation.tm.m)
def formulaPolynomial (V : NPVerifier) : Polynomial Nat :=
VerifierBounds.machineBitsPolynomial V.computation.time V.witnessBound
(Runtime.programPushBound V.computation.tm)
((indexing V).labelCount + (indexing V).stateCount) (indexing V).symbolCount
(MachineCircuit.expressionCost V.computation.tm.m)
theorem circuitOfVerifier_gates_le_polynomial (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) :
(circuitOfVerifier V input).gates.length ≤ (gatePolynomial V).eval input.length := by
have hw := widthPolynomial_eval V input
unfold widthPolynomial at hw
simpa only [gatePolynomial, VerifierBounds.machineGatesPolynomial_eval, hw,
Bounds.horizonPolynomial_eval, NPVerifier.horizon] using
circuitOfVerifier_gates_le V input
theorem circuitOfVerifier_formulaBits_length_le (V : NPVerifier) (input : List Bool) :
(formulaBits (circuitOfVerifier V input).toFormula).length ≤
(formulaPolynomial V).eval input.length := by
unfold formulaPolynomial
apply VerifierBounds.toFormula_bits_le_machinePolynomial
· exact Nat.le_refl _
· exact circuitOfVerifier_gates_le_polynomial V input
end BinPackingGames.Foundations.Complexity.CookLevin.VerifierCircuit
end
end OAI