roseking's picture
Add lean source and binary files (part 61)
ea76aac verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
37.7 kB
import Mathlib
import OAI.Computability.DirectedFeedback.Machines.ContextLoad
namespace OAI
namespace DFVSGames.Reduction.CloneGap
variable {Element OtherElement : Type*}
def cart (xs : List Element) (ys : List OtherElement) : List (Element × OtherElement) :=
xs.flatMap fun x => ys.map fun y => (x, y)
theorem count_const (xs : List Element) (b : Bool) :
xs.countP (fun _ => b) = if b then xs.length else 0 := by
cases b <;> simp
theorem count_cart (xs : List Element) (ys : List OtherElement)
(p : Element → Bool) (q : OtherElement → Bool) :
(cart xs ys).countP (fun z => p z.1 && q z.2) =
xs.countP p * ys.countP q := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp [cart]
| cons x xs ih =>
simp only [cart, List.flatMap_cons, List.countP_append] at *
rw [ih]
cases h : p x <;>
simp [List.countP_map, Function.comp_def, h, Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_comm]
theorem length_cart (xs : List Element) (ys : List OtherElement) :
(cart xs ys).length = xs.length * ys.length := by
have := count_cart xs ys (fun _ => true) (fun _ => true)
simpa using this
theorem count_cart_left (xs : List Element) (ys : List OtherElement) (p : Element → Bool) :
(cart xs ys).countP (fun z => p z.1) = xs.countP p * ys.length := by
simpa using count_cart xs ys p (fun _ => true)
theorem count_cart_right (xs : List Element) (ys : List OtherElement) (p : OtherElement → Bool) :
(cart xs ys).countP (fun z => p z.2) = xs.length * ys.countP p := by
simpa using count_cart xs ys (fun _ => true) p
theorem count_cart_le (xs : List Element) (ys : List OtherElement)
(p : Element × OtherElement → Bool)
(bound : Nat) (h : ∀ x ∈ xs, ys.countP (fun y => p (x, y)) ≤ bound) :
(cart xs ys).countP p ≤ xs.length * bound := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp [cart]
| cons x xs ih =>
have hx := h x (by simp)
have ht := ih (fun y hy => h y (by simp [hy]))
simp only [cart, List.flatMap_cons, List.countP_append, List.countP_map,
Function.comp_def] at *
simp only [List.length_cons, Nat.add_mul]
omega
theorem count_union_le (xs : List Element) (p q : Element → Bool) :
xs.countP (fun x => p x || q x) ≤ xs.countP p + xs.countP q := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp
| cons x xs ih =>
cases hp : p x <;> cases hq : q x <;>
simp [hp, hq] at * <;> omega
theorem count_remove (xs : List Element) (p q : Element → Bool) :
xs.countP p ≤ xs.countP (fun x => p x && !q x) + xs.countP q := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp
| cons x xs ih =>
cases hp : p x <;> cases hq : q x <;>
simp [hp, hq] at * <;> omega
abbrev Index := Nat
def indices : List Index := List.range 48
def triples : List (Index × Index × Index) := cart indices (cart indices indices)
def collision (t : Index × Index × Index) : Bool :=
(t.1 == t.2.1) || (t.1 == t.2.2) || (t.2.1 == t.2.2)
def distinctTriples : List (Index × Index × Index) := triples.filter (fun t => !collision t)
theorem length_indices : indices.length = 48 := by simp [indices]
theorem length_triples : triples.length = 110592 := by
simp [triples, length_cart, length_indices]
theorem count_index_eq_le (i : Index) : indices.countP (fun j => i == j) ≤ 1 := by
have h := List.count_range (a := i) (n := 48)
have heq : (fun j => i == j) = (fun j => j == i) := by
funext j
exact Bool.beq_comm
rw [heq]
change (List.range 48).count i ≤ 1
rw [h]
split <;> omega
theorem count_collision_le : triples.countP collision ≤ 6912 := by
have h12 : triples.countP (fun t => t.1 == t.2.1) ≤ 2304 := by
apply count_cart_le indices (cart indices indices) _ 48
intro i _
change (cart indices indices).countP (fun y => i == y.1) ≤ 48
rw [count_cart_left indices indices (fun j => i == j), length_indices]
have := count_index_eq_le i
omega
have h13 : triples.countP (fun t => t.1 == t.2.2) ≤ 2304 := by
apply count_cart_le indices (cart indices indices) _ 48
intro i _
change (cart indices indices).countP (fun y => i == y.2) ≤ 48
rw [count_cart_right indices indices (fun j => i == j), length_indices]
have := count_index_eq_le i
omega
have h23 : triples.countP (fun t => t.2.1 == t.2.2) ≤ 2304 := by
change (cart indices (cart indices indices)).countP (fun t => t.2.1 == t.2.2) ≤ 2304
rw [count_cart_right indices (cart indices indices) (fun t => t.1 == t.2), length_indices]
have h : (cart indices indices).countP (fun t => t.1 == t.2) ≤ 48 := by
apply count_cart_le indices indices _ 1
intro i _
exact count_index_eq_le i
omega
have hA := count_union_le triples (fun t => t.1 == t.2.1) (fun t => t.1 == t.2.2)
have hB := count_union_le triples
(fun t => (t.1 == t.2.1) || (t.1 == t.2.2)) (fun t => t.2.1 == t.2.2)
unfold collision
omega
theorem majority_exists (g : Index → Bool) :
∃ b : Bool, 24 ≤ indices.countP (fun i => g i == b) := by
have h := List.length_eq_countP_add_countP g (l := indices)
have hn : (fun i => decide (¬g i = true)) = (fun i => !g i) := by
funext i
cases g i <;> rfl
rw [hn] at h
rw [length_indices] at h
by_cases ht : 24 ≤ indices.countP g
· exact ⟨true, by simpa using ht⟩
· refine ⟨false, ?_⟩
have : 24 ≤ indices.countP (fun i => !g i) := by omega
simpa using this
def allAgree (p q r : Index → Bool) (t : Index × Index × Index) : Bool :=
p t.1 && (q t.2.1 && r t.2.2)
theorem count_agree_distinct (p q r : Index → Bool)
(hp : 24 ≤ indices.countP p) (hq : 24 ≤ indices.countP q)
(hr : 24 ≤ indices.countP r) :
6912 ≤ distinctTriples.countP (allAgree p q r) := by
have hprod := count_cart indices (cart indices indices) p
(fun t => q t.1 && r t.2)
rw [count_cart] at hprod
have h1 : 24 * 24 ≤ indices.countP q * indices.countP r := Nat.mul_le_mul hq hr
have h2 : 24 * (24 * 24) ≤ indices.countP p *
(indices.countP q * indices.countP r) := Nat.mul_le_mul hp h1
have hremove := count_remove triples (allAgree p q r) collision
have hcollision := count_collision_le
change triples.countP (allAgree p q r) = _ at hprod
unfold distinctTriples
rw [List.countP_filter]
omega
structure Equation (Name : Type) where
first : Name
second : Name
third : Name
rhs : Bool
variable {Name : Type}
def satisfied (e : Equation Name) (g : Name → Bool) : Bool :=
(xor (xor (g e.first) (g e.second)) (g e.third)) == e.rhs
def clone (e : Equation Name) (t : Index × Index × Index) : Equation (Name × Index) :=
⟨(e.first, t.1), (e.second, t.2.1), (e.third, t.2.2), e.rhs⟩
theorem lift_preserves (e : Equation Name) (t : Index × Index × Index) (g : Name → Bool) :
satisfied (clone e t) (fun z => g z.1) = satisfied e g := rfl
theorem clone_names_distinct (e : Equation Name) (t : Index × Index × Index)
(h : collision t = false) :
(clone e t).first ≠ (clone e t).second ∧
(clone e t).first ≠ (clone e t).third ∧
(clone e t).second ≠ (clone e t).third := by
simp only [collision, Bool.or_eq_false_iff, beq_eq_false_iff_ne] at h
dsimp [clone]
exact ⟨fun he => h.1.1 (congrArg Prod.snd he),
fun he => h.1.2 (congrArg Prod.snd he),
fun he => h.2 (congrArg Prod.snd he)⟩
theorem agree_failure (e : Equation Name) (g : Name × Index → Bool)
(majority : Name → Bool) (t : Index × Index × Index)
(hfail : satisfied e majority = false)
(h : allAgree (fun i => g (e.first, i) == majority e.first)
(fun i => g (e.second, i) == majority e.second)
(fun i => g (e.third, i) == majority e.third) t = true) :
satisfied (clone e t) g = false := by
simp only [allAgree, Bool.and_eq_true, beq_iff_eq] at h
simpa [satisfied, clone, h.1, h.2.1, h.2.2] using hfail
theorem failed_occurrence_clones (e : Equation Name) (g : Name × Index → Bool)
(majority : Name → Bool)
(hmaj : ∀ v, 24 ≤ indices.countP (fun i => g (v, i) == majority v))
(hfail : satisfied e majority = false) :
6912 ≤ distinctTriples.countP (fun t => !satisfied (clone e t) g) := by
have h := count_agree_distinct
(fun i => g (e.first, i) == majority e.first)
(fun i => g (e.second, i) == majority e.second)
(fun i => g (e.third, i) == majority e.third)
(hmaj _) (hmaj _) (hmaj _)
apply Nat.le_trans h
apply List.countP_mono_left
intro t _ ht
have hf := agree_failure e g majority t hfail ht
simp [hf]
def majorityBit (g : Index → Bool) : Bool := decide (24 ≤ indices.countP g)
theorem majorityBit_count (g : Index → Bool) :
24 ≤ indices.countP (fun i => g i == majorityBit g) := by
have h := List.length_eq_countP_add_countP g (l := indices)
have hn : (fun i => decide (¬g i = true)) = (fun i => !g i) := by
funext i
cases g i <;> rfl
rw [hn, length_indices] at h
by_cases ht : 24 ≤ indices.countP g
· simp [majorityBit, ht]
· have hn : 24 ≤ indices.countP (fun i => !g i) := by omega
simpa [majorityBit, ht] using hn
def cloneList (source : List (Equation Name)) : List (Equation (Name × Index)) :=
source.flatMap fun e => distinctTriples.map (clone e)
theorem length_cloneList (source : List (Equation Name)) :
(cloneList source).length = source.length * distinctTriples.length := by
induction source with
| nil => simp [cloneList]
| cons e es ih =>
simp only [cloneList, List.flatMap_cons, List.length_append, List.length_map] at *
rw [ih]
simp [Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_comm]
theorem cloneList_failure_lower (source : List (Equation Name))
(g : Name × Index → Bool) (majority : Name → Bool)
(hmaj : ∀ v, 24 ≤ indices.countP (fun i => g (v, i) == majority v)) :
6912 * source.countP (fun e => !satisfied e majority) ≤
(cloneList source).countP (fun e => !satisfied e g) := by
induction source with
| nil => simp [cloneList]
| cons e es ih =>
simp only [cloneList, List.flatMap_cons, List.countP_append,
List.countP_map, Function.comp_def] at *
cases hf : satisfied e majority with
| false =>
have he := failed_occurrence_clones e g majority hmaj hf
simp [hf, Nat.mul_add] at *
omega
| true =>
simp [hf]
omega
theorem clone_gap (source : List (Equation Name))
(source_gap : ∀ A : Name → Bool,
source.length ≤ 4 * source.countP (fun e => !satisfied e A))
(g : Name × Index → Bool) :
(cloneList source).length ≤
64 * (cloneList source).countP (fun e => !satisfied e g) := by
let majority : Name → Bool := fun v => majorityBit (fun i => g (v, i))
have hmaj : ∀ v, 24 ≤ indices.countP (fun i => g (v, i) == majority v) :=
fun v => majorityBit_count (fun i => g (v, i))
have hlocal := cloneList_failure_lower source g majority hmaj
have hsource := source_gap majority
have hd : distinctTriples.length ≤ 110592 := by
exact Nat.le_trans (List.length_filter_le _ triples) (by simp [length_triples])
rw [length_cloneList]
have hlength := Nat.mul_le_mul_left source.length hd
have hs := Nat.mul_le_mul_right 27648 hsource
have hc := Nat.mul_le_mul_left 64 hlocal
omega
theorem clone_completeness_count (source : List (Equation Name)) (A : Name → Bool) :
(cloneList source).countP (fun e => satisfied e (fun z => A z.1)) =
source.countP (fun e => satisfied e A) * distinctTriples.length := by
induction source with
| nil => simp [cloneList]
| cons e es ih =>
simp only [cloneList, List.flatMap_cons, List.countP_append,
List.countP_map, Function.comp_def] at *
rw [ih]
have he : (fun t => satisfied (clone e t) (fun z => A z.1)) =
(fun _ => satisfied e A) := by
funext t
exact lift_preserves e t A
rw [he, count_const]
cases h : satisfied e A <;> simp [h, Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_comm]
end DFVSGames.Reduction.CloneGap
namespace DFVSGames.Foundations.Hastad.FoldedEquation
open DFVSGames.Reduction.CloneGap
open scoped BigOperators
variable {I J : Type} [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] [Fintype J] [DecidableEq J]
abbrev Address (i₀ : I) (j₀ : J) := HalfCube i₀ ⊕ HalfCube j₀
def storedAssignment {i₀ : I} {j₀ : J}
(tableA : HalfCube i₀ → Bool) (tableB : HalfCube j₀ → Bool) :
Address i₀ j₀ → Bool := Sum.elim tableA tableB
def rhsCorrection (π : J → I) (i₀ : I) (j₀ : J)
(f : Cube I) (μ : Cube J) : Bool := f i₀ ^^ f (π j₀) ^^ μ j₀
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] [Fintype J] [DecidableEq J] in
theorem correction_eq (π : J → I) (i₀ : I) (j₀ : J)
(f : Cube I) (g μ : Cube J) :
(f i₀ ^^ g j₀ ^^ thirdQuery π f g μ j₀) = rhsCorrection π i₀ j₀ f μ := by
change (f i₀ ^^ g j₀ ^^ (g j₀ ^^ (f (π j₀) ^^ μ j₀))) =
(f i₀ ^^ f (π j₀) ^^ μ j₀)
cases f i₀ <;> cases g j₀ <;> cases f (π j₀) <;> cases μ j₀ <;> rfl
def equation (π : J → I) (i₀ : I) (j₀ : J)
(f : Cube I) (g μ : Cube J) : Equation (Address i₀ j₀) where
first := .inl (canonicalInput i₀ f)
second := .inr (canonicalInput j₀ g)
third := .inr (canonicalInput j₀ (thirdQuery π f g μ))
rhs := rhsCorrection π i₀ j₀ f μ
theorem xor_corrections (a b c u v w : Bool) :
((a ^^ b ^^ c) == (u ^^ v ^^ w)) =
!((a ^^ u) ^^ (b ^^ v) ^^ (c ^^ w)) := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> cases c <;> cases u <;> cases v <;> cases w <;> rfl
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] [Fintype J] [DecidableEq J] in
theorem equation_satisfied (π : J → I) (i₀ : I) (j₀ : J)
(tableA : HalfCube i₀ → Bool) (tableB : HalfCube j₀ → Bool)
(f : Cube I) (g μ : Cube J) :
satisfied (equation π i₀ j₀ f g μ) (storedAssignment tableA tableB) =
!(foldedAnswer i₀ tableA f ^^ foldedAnswer j₀ tableB g ^^
foldedAnswer j₀ tableB (thirdQuery π f g μ)) := by
change ((tableA (canonicalInput i₀ f) ^^ tableB (canonicalInput j₀ g) ^^
tableB (canonicalInput j₀ (thirdQuery π f g μ))) == rhsCorrection π i₀ j₀ f μ) = _
rw [← correction_eq π i₀ j₀ f g μ]
exact xor_corrections _ _ _ _ _ _
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] [Fintype J] [DecidableEq J] in
theorem equation_satisfied_iff (π : J → I) (i₀ : I) (j₀ : J)
(tableA : HalfCube i₀ → Bool) (tableB : HalfCube j₀ → Bool)
(f : Cube I) (g μ : Cube J) :
satisfied (equation π i₀ j₀ f g μ) (storedAssignment tableA tableB) = true ↔
(foldedAnswer i₀ tableA f ^^ foldedAnswer j₀ tableB g ^^
foldedAnswer j₀ tableB (thirdQuery π f g μ)) = false := by
rw [equation_satisfied]
simp
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] [Fintype J] [DecidableEq J] in
theorem equation_indicator (π : J → I) (i₀ : I) (j₀ : J)
(tableA : HalfCube i₀ → Bool) (tableB : HalfCube j₀ → Bool)
(f : Cube I) (g μ : Cube J) :
(if satisfied (equation π i₀ j₀ f g μ) (storedAssignment tableA tableB)
then (1 : ℝ) else 0) =
(if foldedAnswer i₀ tableA f ^^ foldedAnswer j₀ tableB g ^^
foldedAnswer j₀ tableB (thirdQuery π f g μ) then 0 else 1) := by
rw [equation_satisfied]
cases foldedAnswer i₀ tableA f ^^ foldedAnswer j₀ tableB g ^^
foldedAnswer j₀ tableB (thirdQuery π f g μ) <;> rfl
theorem satisfied_repeated_right {Name : Type} (e : Equation Name)
(assignment : Name → Bool) (h : e.second = e.third) :
satisfied e assignment = (assignment e.first == e.rhs) := by
unfold satisfied
rw [← h]
cases assignment e.first <;> cases assignment e.second <;> cases e.rhs <;> rfl
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] [Fintype J] [DecidableEq J] in
theorem equation_repeated_right (π : J → I) (i₀ : I) (j₀ : J)
(tableA : HalfCube i₀ → Bool) (tableB : HalfCube j₀ → Bool)
(f : Cube I) (g μ : Cube J)
(h : canonicalInput j₀ g = canonicalInput j₀ (thirdQuery π f g μ)) :
satisfied (equation π i₀ j₀ f g μ) (storedAssignment tableA tableB) =
(tableA (canonicalInput i₀ f) == rhsCorrection π i₀ j₀ f μ) := by
apply satisfied_repeated_right
exact congrArg Sum.inr h
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] [Fintype J] [DecidableEq J] in
theorem restrict_thirdQuery (valid : J → Bool) (π : J → I)
(f : Cube I) (g μ : Cube J) :
restrictQuery valid (thirdQuery π f g μ) =
thirdQuery (fun j : {j : J // valid j = true} => π j.val) f
(restrictQuery valid g) (restrictQuery valid μ) := rfl
def conditionedEquation (valid : J → Bool) (π : J → I)
(i₀ : I) (j₀ : {j : J // valid j = true})
(f : Cube I) (g μ : Cube J) : Equation (Address i₀ j₀) :=
equation (fun j => π j.val) i₀ j₀ f (restrictQuery valid g) (restrictQuery valid μ)
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] [Fintype J] [DecidableEq J] in
theorem conditionedEquation_rhs (valid : J → Bool) (π : J → I)
(i₀ : I) (j₀ : {j : J // valid j = true}) (f : Cube I) (g μ : Cube J) :
(conditionedEquation valid π i₀ j₀ f g μ).rhs =
(f i₀ ^^ f (π j₀.val) ^^ μ j₀.val) := rfl
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] [Fintype J] [DecidableEq J] in
theorem conditionedEquation_satisfied (valid : J → Bool) (π : J → I)
(i₀ : I) (j₀ : {j : J // valid j = true})
(tableA : HalfCube i₀ → Bool) (tableB : HalfCube j₀ → Bool)
(f : Cube I) (g μ : Cube J) :
satisfied (conditionedEquation valid π i₀ j₀ f g μ) (storedAssignment tableA tableB) =
!(foldedAnswer i₀ tableA f ^^ conditionedFoldedAnswer valid j₀ tableB g ^^
conditionedFoldedAnswer valid j₀ tableB (thirdQuery π f g μ)) := by
unfold conditionedEquation
rw [equation_satisfied]
simp only [conditionedFoldedAnswer, restrict_thirdQuery]
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] [Fintype J] [DecidableEq J] in
theorem conditionedEquation_satisfied_iff (valid : J → Bool) (π : J → I)
(i₀ : I) (j₀ : {j : J // valid j = true})
(tableA : HalfCube i₀ → Bool) (tableB : HalfCube j₀ → Bool)
(f : Cube I) (g μ : Cube J) :
satisfied (conditionedEquation valid π i₀ j₀ f g μ) (storedAssignment tableA tableB) = true ↔
(foldedAnswer i₀ tableA f ^^ conditionedFoldedAnswer valid j₀ tableB g ^^
conditionedFoldedAnswer valid j₀ tableB (thirdQuery π f g μ)) = false := by
rw [conditionedEquation_satisfied]
simp
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] [Fintype J] [DecidableEq J] in
theorem conditionedEquation_indicator (valid : J → Bool) (π : J → I)
(i₀ : I) (j₀ : {j : J // valid j = true})
(tableA : HalfCube i₀ → Bool) (tableB : HalfCube j₀ → Bool)
(f : Cube I) (g μ : Cube J) :
(if satisfied (conditionedEquation valid π i₀ j₀ f g μ) (storedAssignment tableA tableB)
then (1 : ℝ) else 0) =
(if foldedAnswer i₀ tableA f ^^ conditionedFoldedAnswer valid j₀ tableB g ^^
conditionedFoldedAnswer valid j₀ tableB (thirdQuery π f g μ) then 0 else 1) := by
rw [conditionedEquation_satisfied]
cases foldedAnswer i₀ tableA f ^^ conditionedFoldedAnswer valid j₀ tableB g ^^
conditionedFoldedAnswer valid j₀ tableB (thirdQuery π f g μ) <;> rfl
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] [Fintype J] [DecidableEq J] in
theorem conditionedEquation_repeated_right (valid : J → Bool) (π : J → I)
(i₀ : I) (j₀ : {j : J // valid j = true})
(tableA : HalfCube i₀ → Bool) (tableB : HalfCube j₀ → Bool)
(f : Cube I) (g μ : Cube J)
(h : canonicalInput j₀ (restrictQuery valid g) =
canonicalInput j₀ (restrictQuery valid (thirdQuery π f g μ))) :
satisfied (conditionedEquation valid π i₀ j₀ f g μ) (storedAssignment tableA tableB) =
(tableA (canonicalInput i₀ f) == (f i₀ ^^ f (π j₀.val) ^^ μ j₀.val)) := by
apply satisfied_repeated_right
exact congrArg Sum.inr h
noncomputable section
def equationAcceptance (ε : ℝ) (π : J → I) (i₀ : I) (j₀ : J)
(tableA : HalfCube i₀ → Bool) (tableB : HalfCube j₀ → Bool) : ℝ :=
𝔼 f, ∑ μ, noiseWeight ε μ *
(𝔼 g, if satisfied (equation π i₀ j₀ f g μ) (storedAssignment tableA tableB)
then (1 : ℝ) else 0)
theorem equationAcceptance_eq (ε : ℝ) (π : J → I) (i₀ : I) (j₀ : J)
(tableA : HalfCube i₀ → Bool) (tableB : HalfCube j₀ → Bool) :
equationAcceptance ε π i₀ j₀ tableA tableB =
testAcceptance ε π (foldedAnswer i₀ tableA) (foldedAnswer j₀ tableB) := by
unfold equationAcceptance testAcceptance
simp_rw [equation_indicator]
def conditionedEquationAcceptance (ε : ℝ) (valid : J → Bool) (π : J → I)
(i₀ : I) (j₀ : {j : J // valid j = true})
(tableA : HalfCube i₀ → Bool) (tableB : HalfCube j₀ → Bool) : ℝ :=
𝔼 f, ∑ μ, noiseWeight ε μ *
(𝔼 g, if satisfied (conditionedEquation valid π i₀ j₀ f g μ)
(storedAssignment tableA tableB) then (1 : ℝ) else 0)
theorem conditionedEquationAcceptance_eq (ε : ℝ) (valid : J → Bool) (π : J → I)
(i₀ : I) (j₀ : {j : J // valid j = true})
(tableA : HalfCube i₀ → Bool) (tableB : HalfCube j₀ → Bool) :
conditionedEquationAcceptance ε valid π i₀ j₀ tableA tableB =
testAcceptance ε π (foldedAnswer i₀ tableA)
(conditionedFoldedAnswer valid j₀ tableB) := by
unfold conditionedEquationAcceptance testAcceptance
simp_rw [conditionedEquation_indicator]
end
end DFVSGames.Foundations.Hastad.FoldedEquation
namespace DFVSGames.Foundations.Hastad
open DFVSGames.Reduction.CloneGap
open scoped BigOperators
def mapEquation {Name Name' : Type} (rename : Name → Name')
(e : Equation Name) : Equation Name' where
first := rename e.first
second := rename e.second
third := rename e.third
rhs := e.rhs
theorem satisfied_mapEquation {Name Name' : Type} (rename : Name → Name')
(e : Equation Name) (assignment : Name' → Bool) :
satisfied (mapEquation rename e) assignment = satisfied e (assignment ∘ rename) := rfl
namespace EmptyContext
variable {I : Type} [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I]
abbrev Address (i₀ : I) := HalfCube i₀ ⊕ Unit
def storedAssignment {i₀ : I} (table : HalfCube i₀ → Bool) (dummy : Bool) :
Address i₀ → Bool := Sum.elim table (fun _ => dummy)
def equation (i₀ : I) (f : Cube I) : Equation (Address i₀) where
first := .inl (canonicalInput i₀ f)
second := .inr ()
third := .inr ()
rhs := f i₀
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] in
@[simp] theorem equation_second_eq_third (i₀ : I) (f : Cube I) :
(equation i₀ f).second = (equation i₀ f).third := rfl
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] in
theorem equation_satisfied (i₀ : I) (assignment : Address i₀ → Bool) (f : Cube I) :
satisfied (equation i₀ f) assignment =
!(foldedAnswer i₀ (fun h => assignment (.inl h)) f) := by
rw [FoldedEquation.satisfied_repeated_right (equation i₀ f) assignment rfl]
change (assignment (.inl (canonicalInput i₀ f)) == f i₀) =
!(assignment (.inl (canonicalInput i₀ f)) ^^ f i₀)
cases assignment (.inl (canonicalInput i₀ f)) <;> cases f i₀ <;> rfl
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] in
theorem equation_storedAssignment_satisfied (i₀ : I) (table : HalfCube i₀ → Bool)
(dummy : Bool) (f : Cube I) :
satisfied (equation i₀ f) (storedAssignment table dummy) =
!(foldedAnswer i₀ table f) := equation_satisfied i₀ _ f
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] in
theorem equation_flip_first (i₀ : I) (f : Cube I) :
(equation i₀ (cubeFlip f)).first = (equation i₀ f).first := by
change Sum.inl (canonicalInput i₀ (cubeFlip f)) = Sum.inl (canonicalInput i₀ f)
rw [canonicalInput_flip]
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] in
theorem equation_flip_rhs (i₀ : I) (f : Cube I) :
(equation i₀ (cubeFlip f)).rhs = !(equation i₀ f).rhs := rfl
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] in
theorem equation_satisfied_flip (i₀ : I) (assignment : Address i₀ → Bool)
(f : Cube I) :
satisfied (equation i₀ (cubeFlip f)) assignment =
!(satisfied (equation i₀ f) assignment) := by
rw [equation_satisfied, foldedAnswer_flip, equation_satisfied]
def pairedEquations (i₀ : I) (f : Cube I) : List (Equation (Address i₀)) :=
[equation i₀ f, equation i₀ (cubeFlip f)]
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] in
@[simp] theorem pairedEquations_length (i₀ : I) (f : Cube I) :
(pairedEquations i₀ f).length = 2 := rfl
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] in
theorem pairedEquations_ne_nil (i₀ : I) (f : Cube I) :
pairedEquations i₀ f ≠ [] := by simp [pairedEquations]
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] in
theorem pairedEquations_acceptedCount (i₀ : I) (assignment : Address i₀ → Bool)
(f : Cube I) :
(pairedEquations i₀ f).countP (fun e => satisfied e assignment) = 1 := by
simp only [pairedEquations, List.countP_cons, List.countP_nil, equation_satisfied_flip]
cases satisfied (equation i₀ f) assignment <;> rfl
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] in
theorem pairedEquations_failureCount (i₀ : I) (assignment : Address i₀ → Bool)
(f : Cube I) :
(pairedEquations i₀ f).countP (fun e => !(satisfied e assignment)) = 1 := by
simp only [pairedEquations, List.countP_cons, List.countP_nil, equation_satisfied_flip]
cases satisfied (equation i₀ f) assignment <;> rfl
noncomputable section
def equationAcceptance (i₀ : I) (assignment : Address i₀ → Bool) : ℝ :=
𝔼 f : Cube I, if satisfied (equation i₀ f) assignment then (1 : ℝ) else 0
def equationBias (i₀ : I) (assignment : Address i₀ → Bool) : ℝ :=
𝔼 f : Cube I, if satisfied (equation i₀ f) assignment then (1 : ℝ) else -1
theorem foldedMean_eq_zero (i₀ : I) (table : HalfCube i₀ → Bool) :
(𝔼 f : Cube I, bitSign (foldedAnswer i₀ table f)) = 0 := by
simpa [coefficient, walsh, bitSign] using foldedAnswer_zero_coefficient i₀ table
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] in
theorem equation_indicator (i₀ : I) (assignment : Address i₀ → Bool) (f : Cube I) :
(if satisfied (equation i₀ f) assignment then (1 : ℝ) else 0) =
(1 + bitSign (foldedAnswer i₀ (fun h => assignment (.inl h)) f)) / 2 := by
rw [equation_satisfied]
cases foldedAnswer i₀ (fun h => assignment (.inl h)) f <;> norm_num [bitSign]
theorem equationAcceptance_eq_half (i₀ : I) (assignment : Address i₀ → Bool) :
equationAcceptance i₀ assignment = 1 / 2 := by
unfold equationAcceptance
simp_rw [equation_indicator, div_eq_mul_inv, ← Finset.expect_mul,
Finset.expect_add_distrib, Fintype.expect_const, foldedMean_eq_zero]
norm_num
theorem equationBias_eq_zero (i₀ : I) (assignment : Address i₀ → Bool) :
equationBias i₀ assignment = 0 := by
unfold equationBias
have hi (f : Cube I) :
(if satisfied (equation i₀ f) assignment then (1 : ℝ) else -1) =
bitSign (foldedAnswer i₀ (fun h => assignment (.inl h)) f) := by
rw [equation_satisfied]
cases foldedAnswer i₀ (fun h => assignment (.inl h)) f <;> norm_num [bitSign]
simp_rw [hi]
exact foldedMean_eq_zero i₀ _
theorem mapped_equationAcceptance_eq_half {Name : Type} (i₀ : I)
(rename : Address i₀ → Name) (assignment : Name → Bool) :
(𝔼 f : Cube I, if satisfied (mapEquation rename (equation i₀ f)) assignment
then (1 : ℝ) else 0) = 1 / 2 := by
simp only [satisfied_mapEquation]
exact equationAcceptance_eq_half i₀ (assignment ∘ rename)
end
end EmptyContext
end DFVSGames.Foundations.Hastad
namespace DFVSGames.Reduction.FiniteNoise
open scoped BigOperators
open DFVSGames.Foundations.Hastad (noiseWeight)
def realizedBit {D : Nat} (z : Fin D) : Bool := decide (z.val = 0)
def realizedNoise {A : Type*} {D : Nat} (z : A → Fin D) : A → Bool :=
fun a => realizedBit (z a)
theorem realizedBit_eq_true_iff {D : Nat} (positive : 0 < D) (z : Fin D) :
realizedBit z = true ↔ z = ⟨0, positive⟩ := by
simp [realizedBit, Fin.ext_iff]
theorem coordinate_fiber_sum {D : Nat} (positive : 0 < D) (b : Bool) :
(∑ z : Fin D, if realizedBit z = b then (D : ℝ)⁻¹ else 0) =
if b then (D : ℝ)⁻¹ else 1 - (D : ℝ)⁻¹ := by
have hd : (D : ℝ) ≠ 0 := by exact_mod_cast Nat.ne_of_gt positive
have ht : (∑ z : Fin D, if realizedBit z = true then (D : ℝ)⁻¹ else 0) =
(D : ℝ)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [realizedBit_eq_true_iff positive]
simp
have htotal :
(∑ z : Fin D, if realizedBit z = false then (D : ℝ)⁻¹ else 0) +
(∑ z : Fin D, if realizedBit z = true then (D : ℝ)⁻¹ else 0) = 1 := by
rw [← Finset.sum_add_distrib]
have he (z : Fin D) :
(if realizedBit z = false then (D : ℝ)⁻¹ else 0) +
(if realizedBit z = true then (D : ℝ)⁻¹ else 0) = (D : ℝ)⁻¹ := by
cases realizedBit z <;> simp
simp_rw [he]
simp [hd]
cases b <;> simp only [Bool.false_eq_true, ite_false, ite_true]
· linarith
· exact ht
variable {A : Type*} [Fintype A] [DecidableEq A]
theorem noiseWeight_eq_fiber_sum {D : Nat} (positive : 0 < D) (μ : A → Bool) :
noiseWeight ((D : ℝ)⁻¹) μ =
∑ z : A → Fin D,
∏ a, if realizedBit (z a) = μ a then (D : ℝ)⁻¹ else 0 := by
rw [← Fintype.prod_sum (fun (a : A) (z : Fin D) =>
if realizedBit z = μ a then (D : ℝ)⁻¹ else 0)]
unfold noiseWeight
apply Finset.prod_congr rfl
intro a _
exact (coordinate_fiber_sum positive (μ a)).symm
omit [DecidableEq A] in
theorem fiber_product_eq_indicator {D : Nat} (z : A → Fin D) (μ : A → Bool) :
(∏ a, if realizedBit (z a) = μ a then (D : ℝ)⁻¹ else 0) =
if realizedNoise z = μ then ((D : ℝ)⁻¹) ^ Fintype.card A else 0 := by
classical
by_cases h : realizedNoise z = μ
· rw [ite_eq_left h]
have ha (a : A) : realizedBit (z a) = μ a := congrFun h a
simp [ha]
· rw [ite_eq_right h]
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := Function.ne_iff.mp h
apply Finset.prod_eq_zero (Finset.mem_univ a)
exact ite_eq_right ha
theorem expect_realizedNoise {D : Nat} (positive : 0 < D) (H : (A → Bool) → ℝ) :
(𝔼 z : A → Fin D, H (realizedNoise z)) =
∑ μ : A → Bool, noiseWeight ((D : ℝ)⁻¹) μ * H μ := by
classical
symm
simp_rw [noiseWeight_eq_fiber_sum positive, Finset.sum_mul]
rw [Finset.sum_comm]
simp_rw [fiber_product_eq_indicator]
have he (z : A → Fin D) :
(∑ μ : A → Bool,
(if realizedNoise z = μ then ((D : ℝ)⁻¹) ^ Fintype.card A else 0) * H μ) =
((D : ℝ)⁻¹) ^ Fintype.card A * H (realizedNoise z) := by
simp [eq_comm]
simp_rw [he]
rw [Fintype.expect_eq_sum_div_card]
simp only [Fintype.card_fun, Fintype.card_fin, Nat.cast_pow]
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_pow]
rw [← Finset.mul_sum]
exact mul_comm _ _
end DFVSGames.Reduction.FiniteNoise
noncomputable section
namespace DFVSGames.Foundations.Hastad
open scoped BigOperators
open DFVSGames.Reduction.FiniteNoise
variable {I J : Type*} [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] [Fintype J] [DecidableEq J]
omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] [Fintype J] [DecidableEq J] in
theorem dictator_test_parity (π : J → I) (i : I) (j : J) (hπ : π j = i)
(f : Cube I) (g μ : Cube J) :
(f i ^^ g j ^^ (thirdQuery π f g μ) j) = μ j := by
simp only [thirdQuery, cubeXor, hπ]
cases f i <;> cases g j <;> cases μ j <;> rfl
theorem noise_coordinate_sign (ε : ℝ) (j : J) :
(∑ μ : Cube J, noiseWeight ε μ * bitSign (μ j)) = 1 - 2 * ε := by
have hs : support (coordinateMask j) = {j} := by
ext k
simp [support, coordinateMask]
have h := noise_walsh ε (coordinateMask j)
simp_rw [walsh_symm (coordinateMask j), walsh_coordinateMask] at h
simpa only [hs, Finset.card_singleton, pow_one] using h
theorem noise_coordinate_false (ε : ℝ) (j : J) :
(∑ μ : Cube J, noiseWeight ε μ * if μ j then (0 : ℝ) else 1) = 1 - ε := by
have hind (b : Bool) : (if b then (0 : ℝ) else 1) =
(1 + bitSign b) * (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ := by
cases b <;> norm_num [bitSign]
have ht (μ : Cube J) : noiseWeight ε μ * (if μ j then (0 : ℝ) else 1) =
(noiseWeight ε μ + noiseWeight ε μ * bitSign (μ j)) * (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ := by
rw [hind]
ring
simp_rw [ht]
rw [← Finset.sum_mul, Finset.sum_add_distrib, noiseWeight_sum, noise_coordinate_sign]
ring
theorem testAcceptance_dictator (ε : ℝ) (π : J → I)
(i : I) (j : J) (hπ : π j = i) :
testAcceptance ε π (fun f => f i) (fun g => g j) = 1 - ε := by
have hg (f : Cube I) (μ : Cube J) :
(𝔼 g : Cube J, if f i ^^ g j ^^ (thirdQuery π f g μ) j then (0 : ℝ) else 1) =
if μ j then 0 else 1 := by
calc
_ = 𝔼 _g : Cube J, if μ j then (0 : ℝ) else 1 := by
apply Finset.expect_congr rfl
intro g _
rw [dictator_test_parity π i j hπ f g μ]
_ = _ := Fintype.expect_const _
change (𝔼 f : Cube I, ∑ μ : Cube J, noiseWeight ε μ *
(𝔼 g : Cube J, if f i ^^ g j ^^ (thirdQuery π f g μ) j then (0 : ℝ) else 1)) = _
simp_rw [hg]
rw [Fintype.expect_const]
exact noise_coordinate_false ε j
theorem testAcceptance_folded_dictators (ε : ℝ) (π : J → I)
(i₀ i : I) (j₀ j : J) (hπ : π j = i) :
testAcceptance ε π (foldedAnswer i₀ (fun h => h.val i))
(foldedAnswer j₀ (fun h => h.val j)) = 1 - ε := by
have hA : foldedAnswer i₀ (fun h => h.val i) = (fun f : Cube I => f i) :=
funext (foldedAnswer_dictator i₀ i)
have hB : foldedAnswer j₀ (fun h => h.val j) = (fun g : Cube J => g j) :=
funext (foldedAnswer_dictator j₀ j)
rw [hA, hB]
exact testAcceptance_dictator ε π i j hπ
theorem testAcceptance_conditioned_dictators (ε : ℝ) (π : J → I)
(validI : I → Bool) (validJ : J → Bool)
(i₀ i : {i : I // validI i = true}) (j₀ j : {j : J // validJ j = true})
(hπ : π j.val = i.val) :
testAcceptance ε π
(conditionedFoldedAnswer validI i₀ (fun h => h.val i))
(conditionedFoldedAnswer validJ j₀ (fun h => h.val j)) = 1 - ε := by
have hA : conditionedFoldedAnswer validI i₀ (fun h => h.val i) =
(fun f : Cube I => f i.val) :=
funext (conditionedFoldedAnswer_dictator validI i₀ i)
have hB : conditionedFoldedAnswer validJ j₀ (fun h => h.val j) =
(fun g : Cube J => g j.val) :=
funext (conditionedFoldedAnswer_dictator validJ j₀ j)
rw [hA, hB]
exact testAcceptance_dictator ε π i.val j.val hπ
theorem testAcceptance_folded_conditioned_dictators (ε : ℝ) (π : J → I)
(i₀ i : I) (valid : J → Bool)
(j₀ j : {j : J // valid j = true}) (hπ : π j.val = i) :
testAcceptance ε π (foldedAnswer i₀ (fun h => h.val i))
(conditionedFoldedAnswer valid j₀ (fun h => h.val j)) = 1 - ε := by
have hA : foldedAnswer i₀ (fun h => h.val i) = (fun f : Cube I => f i) :=
funext (foldedAnswer_dictator i₀ i)
have hB : conditionedFoldedAnswer valid j₀ (fun h => h.val j) =
(fun g : Cube J => g j.val) :=
funext (conditionedFoldedAnswer_dictator valid j₀ j)
rw [hA, hB]
exact testAcceptance_dictator ε π i j.val hπ
def realizedTestAcceptance (D : Nat) (π : J → I)
(A : Cube I → Bool) (B : Cube J → Bool) : ℝ :=
𝔼 f : Cube I, 𝔼 z : J → Fin D, 𝔼 g : Cube J,
if A f ^^ B g ^^ B (thirdQuery π f g (realizedNoise z)) then 0 else 1
theorem realizedTestAcceptance_eq_testAcceptance {D : Nat} (positive : 0 < D)
(π : J → I) (A : Cube I → Bool) (B : Cube J → Bool) :
realizedTestAcceptance D π A B = testAcceptance ((D : ℝ)⁻¹) π A B := by
unfold realizedTestAcceptance testAcceptance
apply Finset.expect_congr rfl
intro f _
exact expect_realizedNoise positive
(fun μ => 𝔼 g : Cube J, if A f ^^ B g ^^ B (thirdQuery π f g μ) then 0 else 1)
theorem realizedTestAcceptance_dictator {D : Nat} (positive : 0 < D)
(π : J → I) (i : I) (j : J) (hπ : π j = i) :
realizedTestAcceptance D π (fun f => f i) (fun g => g j) = 1 - (D : ℝ)⁻¹ := by
rw [realizedTestAcceptance_eq_testAcceptance positive]
exact testAcceptance_dictator _ π i j hπ
theorem realizedTestAcceptance_folded_dictators {D : Nat} (positive : 0 < D)
(π : J → I) (i₀ i : I) (j₀ j : J) (hπ : π j = i) :
realizedTestAcceptance D π (foldedAnswer i₀ (fun h => h.val i))
(foldedAnswer j₀ (fun h => h.val j)) = 1 - (D : ℝ)⁻¹ := by
rw [realizedTestAcceptance_eq_testAcceptance positive]
exact testAcceptance_folded_dictators _ π i₀ i j₀ j hπ
theorem realizedTestAcceptance_conditioned_dictators {D : Nat} (positive : 0 < D)
(π : J → I) (validI : I → Bool) (validJ : J → Bool)
(i₀ i : {i : I // validI i = true}) (j₀ j : {j : J // validJ j = true})
(hπ : π j.val = i.val) :
realizedTestAcceptance D π
(conditionedFoldedAnswer validI i₀ (fun h => h.val i))
(conditionedFoldedAnswer validJ j₀ (fun h => h.val j)) = 1 - (D : ℝ)⁻¹ := by
rw [realizedTestAcceptance_eq_testAcceptance positive]
exact testAcceptance_conditioned_dictators _ π validI validJ i₀ i j₀ j hπ
theorem realizedTestAcceptance_folded_conditioned_dictators {D : Nat} (positive : 0 < D)
(π : J → I) (i₀ i : I) (valid : J → Bool)
(j₀ j : {j : J // valid j = true}) (hπ : π j.val = i) :
realizedTestAcceptance D π (foldedAnswer i₀ (fun h => h.val i))
(conditionedFoldedAnswer valid j₀ (fun h => h.val j)) = 1 - (D : ℝ)⁻¹ := by
rw [realizedTestAcceptance_eq_testAcceptance positive]
exact testAcceptance_folded_conditioned_dictators _ π i₀ i valid j₀ j hπ
end DFVSGames.Foundations.Hastad
end
end OAI