openAI-math-dataset / lean /OAI /Computability /Logspace /ProbabilityAtoms.lean
roseking's picture
Sync from openai/math@faee2cf485a8 (part 12)
1905fc7 verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
44.9 kB
import OAI.Computability.Logspace.AffineSampling
import OAI.Computability.Logspace.ProbabilityHierarchy
namespace OAI
/-!
Rank cutoffs, bounded row atoms, and their Lipschitz estimates.
From OpenAI, *Exact Derandomization of Logarithmic Space: L = RL = BPL*.
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
section
namespace ExactDerandomization.Analysis
noncomputable section
def clip (a b x : ℝ) := min b (max a x)
def sat (u : ℝ) := clip (-u) u
lemma clip_ic (a b) : Ic 1 (clip a b) := by intro x y e; unfold clip; grind
lemma clip_lip (a b) : Lip 1 (clip a b) := (clip_ic a b).lip
lemma clip_bounds {a b} (h:a≤b) (x) : a≤ clip a b x ∧ clip a b x≤b := by unfold clip; grind
lemma sandwich {u a b:ℝ} (h:-u≤a) (e:b≤u) (x) :
clip a b (sat u x)=clip a b x := by unfold sat clip; grind
lemma Lip.raise {a b f} (h : Lip a f) (e:a≤b) : Lip b f :=
fun x y=> le_trans (h x y) (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right e (abs_nonneg _))
lemma Lip.chain {a b f g} (h : Lip a f) (e : Lip b g) (ha:0≤a) :
Lip (a*b) (fun x=>f (g x)) := by
intro x y
refine le_trans (h (g x) (g y)) ?_
rw [mul_assoc]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (e x y) ha
/-- Building block with bounded fourth-root Lipschitz norm and bounded
sensitivity range. The constants here need not be the algorithmic
clamp coefficients. -/
structure Frag (c : ℝ) (f : ℝ → ℝ) : Prop where
one : 1≤ c
nn : ∀ x,0 ≤ f x
ub : ∀ x,fourth (f x) ≤ c
lip : Lip c (fun x=>fourth (f x))
flat : ∀ x,f (sat c x)=f x
lemma Frag.raise {c f} (h : Frag c f) {b} (hb:c≤b) : Frag b f := by
refine ⟨h.one.trans hb,h.nn,fun x=>(h.ub x).trans hb,h.lip.raise hb,fun x=>?_⟩
calc f (sat b x) = _:= (h.flat _).symm
_ = f (sat c x) := by
unfold sat
rw [show clip (-c) c (clip (-b) b x)=clip (-c) c x from sandwich (by linarith) hb x]
_ = _:=h.flat x
lemma Frag.lipprod {c d : ℝ} {f g p q : ℝ}
(he:|f| ≤ c) (hg:|q|≤d) :
|f*p-g*q| ≤ c * |p-q| + d * |f-g| := by
have hv : f*p-g*q=f*(p-q)+q*(f-g) := by ring
rw [hv]
refine (abs_add_le ..).trans ?_
rw [abs_mul,abs_mul]
exact add_le_add (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right he (abs_nonneg _))
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hg (abs_nonneg _))
lemma Frag.mul {c d f g} (h:Frag c f) (e:Frag d g) :
Frag (2*c*d) (fun x=> f x*g x) := by
have hc:=h.one; have hd:=e.one
have hk x : fourth (f x*g x)=fourth (f x)*fourth (g x) :=
fourth_mul (h.nn x)
have hs (b : ℝ) (ht:1≤b): 0≤b := by linarith
refine ⟨by nlinarith,fun x=>mul_nonneg (h.nn _) (e.nn _),fun x=>?_,fun x y=>?_,fun x=>?_⟩
· rw [hk]
have ht := mul_le_mul (h.ub x) (e.ub x) (fourth_nn _) (hs c hc)
nlinarith
· simp only [hk]
have he (x : ℝ) : |fourth x|=fourth x := abs_of_nonneg (fourth_nn _)
refine (Frag.lipprod (c:=c) (d:=d) (by rw [he];apply h.ub)
(by rw [he]; apply e.ub)).trans ?_
have ht := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (h.lip x y) (hs d hd)
have hy := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (e.lip x y) (hs c hc)
dsimp only at ht hy
linarith
· have hx := (h.raise (b:=2*c*d) (by nlinarith)).flat x
have he := (e.raise (b:=2*c*d) (by nlinarith)).flat x
simp only [hx,he]
lemma Frag.scale_clip {c f} (h:Frag c f) {u d a b:ℝ} (hu:|u|≤d) :
Frag (c*d + |a| + |b| + c) (fun x=> f (u*clip a b x)) := by
let z:=c*d+|a|+|b|+c
have hc := h.one; have hd:=abs_nonneg u; have he:=abs_nonneg a; have ht:=abs_nonneg b
have hv : c≤z := by dsimp only [z]; nlinarith
refine ⟨h.one.trans hv,fun _=>h.nn _,fun x=> le_trans (h.ub _) hv,fun x y=>?_,fun x=>?_⟩
· have hh : |u * clip a b y-u*clip a b x|≤d * |y-x| := by
rw [← mul_sub,abs_mul]
have h := clip_lip a b x y
rw [one_mul] at h
exact mul_le_mul hu h (abs_nonneg _) (le_trans hd hu)
have hz := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hh (show 0≤c by linarith)
dsimp only [z]
calc _ ≤ _ := h.lip (u*clip a b x) (u*clip a b y)
_ ≤ _ := by nlinarith [abs_nonneg (y-x)]
· rw [sandwich]
· nlinarith [neg_le_abs a]
· nlinarith [le_abs_self b]
lemma Frag.cnst (x : ℝ) (h:0≤x) : Frag (1+fourth x) (fun _=>x) :=
⟨by linarith [fourth_nn x],fun _=>h,fun _=>by linarith,by
intro a b; simp; have := fourth_nn x; positivity,fun _=>rfl⟩
/-- convenient sufficient condition for bounded-away-from-zero leaves -/
lemma rootSlope {z x y : ℝ} (h:0<z) (hx:z≤x) (hy:z≤y) :
|fourth y-fourth x| ≤ |y-x|/(fourth z)^3 := by
have hu (a b : ℝ) (ha:z≤a) (hab:a≤b) :
|fourth b-fourth a| ≤ |b-a|/(fourth z)^3 := by
let r:= fourth z; let s:=fourth a; let t:=fourth b
have hr : 0<r:=fourth_pos h
have hs : r ≤ s:= fourth_mono ha
have ht : s≤t:= fourth_mono hab
change |t-s| ≤ |b-a|/r^3
rw [abs_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg.mpr ht), abs_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg.mpr hab),
le_div_iff₀ (pow_pos hr _)]
have hj : r^3≤t^3+t^2*s+t*s^2+s^3 := by
have hv : r^3 ≤ s^3 := pow_le_pow_left₀ (le_of_lt hr) hs 3
have h1:0<s := lt_of_lt_of_le hr hs; have h2:0<t:=lt_of_lt_of_le h1 ht
exact le_trans hv (le_add_of_nonneg_left (by positivity))
have he : s^4=a:=fourth_four (by linarith)
have hg : t^4=b:=fourth_four (by linarith)
nlinarith [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hj (sub_nonneg.mpr ht)]
rcases le_total x y with h|h
· exact hu x y hx h
· rw [abs_sub_comm,abs_sub_comm y x]
exact hu y x hy h
lemma frag_positive {low high u c : ℝ} {f : ℝ→ℝ} (h:0<low)
(_:0≤u) (e : ∀ x, low ≤ f x ∧ f x≤high)
(he : Lip c f) (hh : ∀ x,f (sat u x)=f x) :
∃ c', Frag c' f := by
let C := max (max u 1) (max (fourth high) (c/(fourth low)^3))
have hs : 1≤C ∧ u≤C ∧ fourth high≤C ∧ c/(fourth low)^3≤C := by unfold C; grind
refine ⟨C,hs.1,fun x=> le_trans (le_of_lt h) (e x).1,fun x=>
le_trans (fourth_mono (e x).2) hs.2.2.1, ?_,fun x=>?_⟩
· refine Lip.raise (a:=c/(fourth low)^3) ?_ hs.2.2.2
intro x y
have hy := rootSlope h (e x).1 (e y).1
exact hy.trans (by rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div]; exact div_le_div_of_nonneg_right (he x y) (pow_nonneg (fourth_nn _) _ ))
· have hee : sat u (sat C x)=sat u x := sandwich (by linarith [hs.2.1]) hs.2.1 x
calc _ = f (sat u (sat C x)) := (hh _).symm
_ = _ := by rw [hee,hh]
lemma frag_switch {a b : ℝ} (h:a<b) :
∃ c, Frag c (rising a b) ∧ Frag c (fun x=>1-rising a b x) := by
obtain ⟨v,hv,hr,hn⟩ := rising_root h
let c:=max (max (-a) b) (max 1 v)
have hh : -a≤c ∧ b≤c ∧ 1≤c ∧ v≤c := by unfold c; grind
have h0 {x:ℝ} (hx:x≤1) : fourth x ≤ c := by
exact (fourth_mono hx).trans (by simpa [fourth] using hh.2.2.1)
have hf (x) : rising a b (sat c x)=rising a b x := by
unfold sat clip
rcases le_total x (-c) with hl|hl
· rw [rising_bot h (by grind),rising_bot h (by linarith [hh.1])]
rcases le_total c x with he|he
· rw [rising_top h (by grind),rising_top h (by grind)]
rw [max_eq_right hl,min_eq_right he]
refine ⟨c,⟨hh.2.2.1,fun _=>(rising_mem ..).1,fun _=> h0 (rising_mem ..).2,
hr.raise hh.2.2.2,hf⟩,hh.2.2.1,fun x=>?_,fun x=>?_,hn.raise hh.2.2.2,fun x=>?_⟩
· exact sub_nonneg.mpr (rising_mem ..).2
· exact h0 (sub_le_self _ (rising_mem ..).1)
· simp only [hf]
end
end ExactDerandomization.Analysis
end
section
namespace ExactDerandomization.At
noncomputable section
open Analysis Hie Finset
abbrev cut := rising (1/2) 1
lemma cut_low {x : ℝ} (h:x≤1/2) : cut x=0 := rising_bot (by norm_num) h
lemma cut_high {x : ℝ} (h:1≤x) : cut x=1 := rising_top (by norm_num) h
def highcut (k : ℕ) (d : ℝ) := if k=0 then 1 else 1-cut (d/16)
def sw (k : ℕ) (d : ℝ) := cut d * highcut k d
def bin (k : ℕ) (x : ℝ) := x*sw k (x/rate k)
lemma high_mem (k) (x) : in01 (highcut k x) := by
unfold highcut
split
· unfold in01; norm_num
obtain ⟨h,h'⟩:= rising_mem (1/2:ℝ) 1 (x/16)
unfold in01 cut; constructor <;> linarith
lemma sw_mem (k) (x) : in01 (sw k x) := by
unfold sw
have hh : in01 (cut x):=rising_mem ..; have hs:=high_mem k x
exact ⟨mul_nonneg hh.1 hs.1,(mul_le_mul hh.2 hs.2 hs.1 zero_le_one).trans_eq (by norm_num)⟩
lemma bin_mem {x k} (h:0≤x) : 0 ≤ bin k x ∧ bin k x ≤ x := by
obtain ⟨h1,h2⟩:=sw_mem k (x/rate k)
exact ⟨mul_nonneg h h1,(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h2 h).trans_eq (by ring)⟩
lemma sw_bot {x k} (h:x≤1/2) : sw k x=0 := by rw [sw,cut_low h]; ring
lemma sw_top {x k} (h:16≤x) (e:k≠0) : sw k x=0 := by
rw [sw,highcut,ite_eq_right e,cut_high (show 1≤x/16 by linarith)]; ring
lemma sw_succ (k x) : sw (k+1) x=cut x-cut (x/16) := by
rw [sw,highcut,ite_eq_right (by omega)]
rcases le_total 1 x with h|h
· rw [cut_high h]; ring
· rw [cut_low (by linarith : x/16≤1/2)]; ring
lemma rate_step (k) : rate (k+1)=rate k/16 := by
unfold rate; rw [pow_succ]; ring
lemma rate0 : rate 0=1 := by norm_num [rate]
lemma rate_small (k) : rate k≤1 := by
induction k with
| zero=>exact le_of_eq rate0
| succ k ih=>rw [rate_step]; linarith
lemma telescope (x k) : ∑ j∈range (k+1), bin j x=x*cut (x/rate k) := by
induction k with
| zero=>simp [bin,sw,highcut]
| succ k ih=>
rw [sum_range_succ,ih,bin,sw_succ]
rw [show x/rate (k+1)/16=x/rate k from by rw [rate_step]; ring]
ring
lemma discarded {x k} (h:0≤x) :
let r := x-∑ j∈range (k+1),bin j x
0 ≤ r ∧ r ≤ rate k ∧ r ≤ x := by
rw [telescope]
have he : in01 (cut (x/rate k)) := rising_mem ..
rcases le_total (rate k) x with hx|hx
· rw [cut_high (by rw [le_div_iff₀ (rate_pos _)]; linarith)]
simp [h,le_of_lt (rate_pos _)]
· obtain ⟨h1,h2⟩:=he
dsimp; exact ⟨by nlinarith,by nlinarith,by nlinarith⟩
def cap (P : Const) : ℝ := P.T+32
lemma cap_hi (P) : 16≤cap P := by unfold cap; linarith
def tone (P : Const) := clip (1/2) (cap P)
def dirShare (P : Const) (i : Option ℕ) (x : ℝ) :=
match i with
| none=>1
| some i=> share P.M i x
def bfrag (P) (k l) (i : Option ℕ) (d : ℝ) :=
tone P d * sw k (tone P d)*dirShare P i (rate k/rate l*tone P d)
lemma tone_mem (P d) : 1/2 ≤ tone P d ∧ tone P d≤cap P :=
clip_bounds (by linarith [cap_hi P]) d
lemma bfrag_low (P k l i) {d} (h:d≤1/2) :
bfrag P k l i d=0 := by
have e: tone P d=1/2:=by unfold tone clip; rw [max_eq_left h,min_eq_right (by linarith [cap_hi P])]
rw [bfrag,e,sw_bot (le_refl _)]; ring
lemma bexact (P k l i) (x : ℝ) (h : x ≤ (P.T+1:ℝ)*rate l) :
rate k*bfrag P k l i (x/rate k)=bin k x * dirShare P i (x/rate l) := by
let d:=x/rate k
rcases le_total d (1/2) with hd|hd
· rw [bfrag_low _ _ _ _ hd,bin,sw_bot hd]; ring
rcases le_total d (cap P) with he|he
· have ee : tone P d=d := by unfold tone clip; rw [max_eq_right hd,min_eq_right he]
change rate k*(tone P d*sw k (tone P d)* _)=_
rw [ee]
unfold bin; dsimp only [d]; field_simp [ne_of_gt (rate_pos k)]
· have ht:P.T+1<cap P := by unfold cap; linarith
have hh : k≠0 := by
intro h'
have hu := rate_small l
have hv : d=x := by unfold d; rw [h',rate0,div_one]
nlinarith
rw [bfrag,bin, sw_top (le_trans (cap_hi _) he) hh]
have ee : tone P d=cap P := by unfold tone clip; rw [max_eq_right hd,min_eq_left he]
change rate k*(tone P d * sw k (tone P d) * _) = _
rw [ee,sw_top (cap_hi P) hh]; ring
lemma hiRatio (P : Const) (k) {x} (h:0≤x) (hs : x ≤ (P.T+1 : ℝ)) :
bin k x ≤ cap P*rate k := by
by_cases e:k=0
· refine le_trans (bin_mem h).2 ?_
rw [e,rate0]
unfold cap; linarith
rcases le_total 16 (x/rate k) with ht|ht
· rw [bin,sw_top ht e]
have h0:= rate_pos k; have he:=cap_hi P; nlinarith
· have h0:= (div_le_iff₀ (rate_pos _)).mp ht
have he:=cap_hi P; exact le_trans (bin_mem h).2
(le_trans h0 (by gcongr; exact le_of_lt (rate_pos _)))
lemma dir_regular (P : Const) :
∃ c:ℝ, ∀ i, Frag c (dirShare P i) := by
have hA : bound0<bound1 := by norm_num
obtain ⟨c1,hc1,-⟩:= frag_switch hA
have h0 : 0<P.M := by have := P.mOK; omega
have hp : 0<(P.M:ℝ) := by exact_mod_cast h0
let q:ℝ := (P.M:ℝ)⁻¹
have he : 0<q := inv_pos.mpr hp
have hm : 1≤ (P.M:ℝ):= by exact_mod_cast h0
have hl : ∀ x, q ≤ share P.M 0 x ∧ share P.M 0 x ≤ 1 := by
intro x
refine ⟨?_,share_le h0 _⟩
unfold share Hie.slice
rw [ite_eq_left rfl, div_eq_mul_inv]
obtain ⟨hv,hu⟩ := rising_mem bound0 bound1 x
change q ≤ 1-_+_*q
have hh:q ≤ 1 := by unfold q; rw [inv_le_one₀ hp]; exact hm
nlinarith
have hR := (rising_ic hA).lip
let Z := 8/(bound1-bound0)
obtain ⟨cr,hr⟩ := frag_positive (f:=share P.M 0) (c:=Z*(1+q)) (u:=c1) he
(by linarith [hc1.one]) hl (by
intro x y
let g z := Hie.slice z
change |(share ..)-(share ..)|≤_
have hl : share P.M 0 y-share P.M 0 x = -(g y-g x)+(g y-g x)*q := by
unfold share g q; simp only [ite_true,div_eq_mul_inv]; ring
have h1 : |g y-g x|≤ Z * |y-x|:=hR x y
rw [hl]
refine (abs_add_le ..).trans ?_
rw [abs_neg,abs_mul,abs_of_pos he]
nlinarith [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h1 he.le]) (by intro x; unfold share Hie.slice; rw [hc1.flat])
let v := 2*c1*(1+fourth q)
have hv (i : ℕ) (h:i≠0) : Frag v (share P.M i) := by
unfold share
simpa only [share,h,↓reduceIte,zero_add,div_eq_mul_inv,Hie.slice] using
hc1.mul (Frag.cnst q (le_of_lt he))
let b:=max cr (max v (1+fourth 1))
refine ⟨b,fun i=>?_⟩
cases i with
| none=> exact (Frag.cnst 1 (by norm_num)).raise (by unfold b; grind)
| some i=>
rcases eq_or_ne i 0 with h|h
· subst i; exact hr.raise (le_max_left ..)
· exact (hv i h).raise (by unfold b; grind)
lemma bin_reg (P : Const) (R : ℝ) :
∃ c:ℝ, ∀ k l i, rate k/rate l≤R → Frag c (bfrag P k l i) := by
let a:ℝ:=1/2
let u:=cap P
obtain ⟨cl,hl⟩ := frag_positive (f:=tone P) (c:=1) (u:=u)
(show 0<a by norm_num [a]) (show 0≤u by linarith [cap_hi P]) (tone_mem P)
(clip_lip a u) (fun x=>sandwich (show -u ≤ a by have:=cap_hi P; dsimp only [u,a]; linarith) le_rfl x)
obtain ⟨cs,hchi,hbar⟩:=frag_switch (show a<1 by norm_num [a])
obtain ⟨cr,hr⟩:=dir_regular P
let K (c d:ℝ) := c*d+|a|+|u|+c
have hu : Frag (K cs 1) (fun x=>cut (tone P x)) := by
simpa only [K,one_mul,tone] using hchi.scale_clip
(a:=a) (b:=u) (d:=1) (show |(1:ℝ)|≤ 1 by norm_num)
let v := max (K cs (1/16)) (1+fourth 1)
have he k : Frag v (fun x=> highcut k (tone P x)) := by
by_cases h:k=0
· simp only [highcut,h, ↓reduceIte]
exact (Frag.cnst 1 (by norm_num)).raise (le_max_right ..)
· simp only [highcut,h, ↓reduceIte,cut]
have H:=hbar.scale_clip (a:=a) (b:=u) (show |(1/16:ℝ)| ≤ 1/16 by norm_num)
refine Frag.raise ?_ (le_max_left ..)
convert H using 1
ext x
congr 2; change tone P x/16=1/16*tone P x; ring
refine ⟨2*(2*cl*(2*K cs 1*v))*K cr R,fun k l i h=>?_⟩
have hh := (hr i).scale_clip (a:=a) (b:=u) (d:=R) (show |rate k/rate l|≤R by
rw [abs_of_pos (div_pos (rate_pos _) (rate_pos _))]
exact h)
exact (hl.mul (hu.mul (he k))).mul hh
def Qc (P : Const) (x : ℝ) := Q (clip 0 (cap P) x)
lemma shoulder_reg (P : Const) : ∃ c:ℝ, Frag c (Qc P) := by
obtain ⟨c,hc,h⟩ := shoulder_root A A (by norm_num [A])
let b:=cap P
let C:=max b (max c (fourth (Q b)))
have H : 16≤b := cap_hi P
have H' : b≤C ∧ c≤C ∧ fourth (Q b) ≤ C := by unfold C; grind
refine ⟨C,by linarith [H'.1],fun x=> Qnn _,fun x=>?_,?_,?_⟩
· refine le_trans (fourth_mono ?_) H'.2.2
exact (Qic _ _ (clip_bounds (by linarith) _).2).1
· exact (h.lip.chain (clip_lip 0 b) hc.le).raise (by rw [mul_one]; exact H'.2.1)
· intro x; unfold Qc; rw [sandwich (by linarith [H'.1]) H'.1]
lemma Qc_low {P x} (h:x≤A) : Qc P x=0 := by
exact shoulder_bot (by norm_num [A]) (show clip 0 (cap P) x ≤ A by
unfold clip; have : (0:ℝ)≤A:=by norm_num [A]
exact (min_le_right ..).trans (max_le this h))
end
end ExactDerandomization.At
end
section
namespace ExactDerandomization.At
noncomputable section
open Analysis Hie Finset
abbrev small : ℝ := delta/1000000
abbrev zeta : ℝ := small/1000
lemma zp : 0 < zeta := by norm_num [zeta,small,delta,A]
lemma dp : 0 < delta := by norm_num [delta,A]
/-- use identically clipped denominators on any input -/
def den (x : ℝ) := clip (zeta/2) zeta x/zeta
def divisor (x : ℝ) := (den x)⁻¹
lemma within_den (x) : 1/2 ≤ den x ∧ den x ≤ 1 := by
have hp:=zp
have h:=clip_bounds (a:=zeta/2) (b:=zeta) (by linarith) x
unfold den; constructor
· rw [le_div_iff₀ hp]; linarith [h.1]
· rw [div_le_iff₀ hp]; linarith [h.2]
lemma inv_den (x) : 1 ≤ divisor x ∧ divisor x ≤ 2 := by
have h:=within_den x
have hp : 0 < den x := by linarith [h.1]
unfold divisor
rw [inv_eq_one_div,le_div_iff₀ hp,div_le_iff₀ hp]
constructor <;> linarith [h.1,h.2]
lemma den_reg : ∃ c,Frag c divisor := by
have hz:=zp
refine frag_positive zero_lt_one hz.le inv_den (c:=4/zeta) ?_ ?_
· intro x y
let p:=den x
let q:=den y
have h : 1/2 ≤ p ∧ p ≤ 1 := within_den x
have e : 1/2 ≤ q ∧ q ≤ 1 := within_den y
have hp : 0<p := by linarith [h.1]
have hq : 0<q := by linarith [e.1]
change |q⁻¹-p⁻¹|≤ _
rw [show q⁻¹-p⁻¹=(p-q)/(p*q) from by field_simp, abs_div,abs_of_pos (mul_pos hp hq)]
have hg : |p-q| ≤ |y-x|/zeta := by
unfold p q den; rw [← sub_div,abs_div,abs_of_pos hz]
have h:=clip_lip (zeta/2) zeta x y
rw [abs_sub_comm _ (clip _ _ y)]
rw [one_mul] at h
gcongr
have ht : 1/4≤p*q := by nlinarith [e.1,h.1]
rw [div_le_iff₀ (mul_pos hp hq)]
refine le_trans hg ?_
have hx:=abs_nonneg (y-x)
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_mul_eq_mul_div, div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right hz]; nlinarith
· intro x
unfold divisor den
rw [sandwich (by linarith) le_rfl]
/-- Uniform finite list of pre-incoming figures; product of independent
scalar pieces. -/
structure Trio where
start : ℝ→ℝ
row : ℝ→ℝ
quo : ℝ→ℝ
def Trio.eval (f : Trio) (x r q : ℝ) := f.start x*f.row r*f.quo q
structure TS (z C : ℝ) (f : Trio) : Prop where
start : Frag C f.start
row : Frag C f.row
quo : Frag C f.quo
shut : ∀ x≤z/8,f.start x=0
off : ∀ x≥z/40,f.row x=0
full : ∀ x≤eta z,f.row x=1
lemma TS.nn {z C f} (h : TS z C f) x r q : 0≤ f.eval x r q :=
mul_nonneg (mul_nonneg (h.start.nn x) (h.row.nn r)) (h.quo.nn q)
lemma TS.base {z C f} (h : TS z C f) x r q :
fourth (f.eval x r q)=fourth (f.start x)*fourth (f.row r)*fourth (f.quo q) := by
unfold Trio.eval; rw [fourth_mul (mul_nonneg (h.start.nn x) (h.row.nn r)),
fourth_mul (h.start.nn x)]
lemma TS.flat {z C f} (h : TS z C f) x r q :
f.eval (sat C x) (sat C r) (sat C q)=f.eval x r q := by
simp only [Trio.eval,h.start.flat,h.row.flat,h.quo.flat]
lemma TS.rootub {z C f} (h : TS z C f) x r q : fourth (f.eval x r q) ≤ C^3 := by
rw [h.base]
have hh:=h.row.one
have he:=mul_le_mul (h.start.ub x) (h.row.ub r) (fourth_nn _) (by linarith)
exact (mul_le_mul he (h.quo.ub q) (fourth_nn _) (by positivity)).trans_eq (by ring)
lemma TS.comparison {z C f} (h : TS z C f) {x x' r r' q q' a : ℝ}
(e1:|x-x'|≤a) (e2:|r-r'|≤a) (e3:|q-q'|≤a) :
|fourth (f.eval x r q)-fourth (f.eval x' r' q')|≤ 3*C^3*a := by
have hh:=h.start.one
have e0 : 0≤ C := by linarith
let root (g : ℝ→ℝ) (x : ℝ):=fourth (g x)
have he (g : ℝ→ℝ) (h : Frag C g) (x): |root g x| ≤ C := by
rw [abs_of_nonneg (fourth_nn _)]; exact h.ub x
have he' (g : ℝ→ℝ) (h : Frag C g) (x y) (hi : |x-y|≤a):
|root g x-root g y|≤ C*a := le_trans (h.lip y x) (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hi e0)
rw [h.base,h.base]
have hu := Frag.lipprod (c:=C) (d:=C) (he _ h.start x) (he _ h.row r')
(g:=root f.start x') (p:=root f.row r)
have hv : |root f.start x * root f.row r-root f.start x'*root f.row r'| ≤ 2*C^2*a := by
have h1:=mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (he' _ h.start x x' e1) e0
have h2:=mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (he' _ h.row r r' e2) e0
linarith
have ht := Frag.lipprod (c:=C*C) (d:=C)
(show |root f.start x*root f.row r| ≤ C*C from by
rw [abs_mul]; exact mul_le_mul (he _ h.start _) (he _ h.row _) (abs_nonneg _) e0)
(he _ h.quo q') (g:=root f.start x'*root f.row r') (p:=root f.quo q)
unfold root at ht he' hv
have hq := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (he' _ h.quo q q' e3) (show 0≤C*C by positivity)
have hp := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hv e0
linarith
lemma TS.extend {f t c d} (h:TS t c f) (e:c≤d) : TS t d f :=
⟨h.start.raise e,h.row.raise e,h.quo.raise e,h.shut,h.off,h.full⟩
def mainT (t : ℝ) (phi : ℝ→ℝ) (q : Bool) : Trio :=
{ start:=phi,row:=gate t,quo:= if q then divisor else fun _=>1 }
def prep (t : ℝ) := rising (t/2) (3*t/4)
def prepT (t) := mainT t (prep t) false
/-- auxiliary and all-purpose witness. -/
def suppT (t : ℝ) (b : Bool) : Trio :=
if b then ⟨rising (t/8) (t/6),fun x=>1-rising (t/50) (t/40) x,fun _=>1⟩
else ⟨rising (t/4) (t/3),fun x=>1-rising (t/200) (t/100) x,fun _=>1⟩
lemma main_ts {t C} (h : 0<t) :
∃ c, ∀ f, Frag C f → (∀ x ≤ t/2, f x=0) →
∀ b, TS t c (mainT t f b) := by
have hg : 0<eta t := div_pos h (by norm_num)
obtain ⟨d,-,he⟩ := frag_switch (show eta t<2*eta t by linarith)
obtain ⟨r,hr⟩:=den_reg
have ht := Frag.cnst 1 zero_le_one
let c:=max C (max d (max r (1+fourth 1)))
refine ⟨c,fun f hh hp b=>⟨hh.raise (by unfold c; grind),he.raise (by unfold c; grind),
?_, fun x hx=>hp x (by linarith),fun x hx=> gate_shut h x ?_,gate_full h⟩⟩
· cases b
· exact ht.raise (by unfold c; grind)
· exact hr.raise (by unfold c; grind)
· unfold eta; linarith
lemma supp_ts0 {a b c d t : ℝ} (_ : 0<t) (ha:a<b) (hc:c<d)
(hl : t/8 ≤ a) (hh:d ≤ t/40) (he:eta t ≤ c) :
∃ C, TS t C ⟨rising a b,fun x=>1-rising c d x,fun _=>1⟩ := by
obtain ⟨s,h,-⟩:=frag_switch ha
obtain ⟨r,-,e⟩:=frag_switch hc
let C:=max s (max r (1+fourth 1))
refine ⟨C,h.raise (by unfold C; grind),e.raise (by unfold C; grind),
(Frag.cnst 1 zero_le_one).raise (by unfold C; grind),
fun x h => rising_bot ha (le_trans h hl),
fun x h=> ?_,fun x h=>?_⟩ <;> dsimp only
· rw [rising_top hc (le_trans hh h)]; ring
· rw [rising_bot hc (le_trans h he)]; ring
lemma supp_ts {t : ℝ} (h:0<t) :
∃ c,∀ b,TS t c (suppT t b) := by
have hh : eta t≤ t/200 := by unfold eta; linarith
obtain ⟨s,hs⟩:=supp_ts0 h (show t/8<t/6 by linarith)
(show t/50<t/40 by linarith) le_rfl le_rfl (by linarith)
obtain ⟨r,hr⟩:=supp_ts0 h (show t/4<t/3 by linarith)
(show t/200<t/100 by linarith) (by linarith) (by linarith) hh
exact ⟨max r s, fun b=>by cases b
· exact hr.extend (le_max_left ..)
· exact hs.extend (le_max_right ..)⟩
end
end ExactDerandomization.At
end
section
namespace ExactDerandomization.At
noncomputable section
open Analysis Hie Finset
abbrev Pt := ℝ × ℝ
structure Blob where
base : ℝ
ts : ℕ → Pt
namespace Blob
def rk (S : Domain) (K : ℕ) (u : Blob) :=
max (rank S (fun i=>(u.ts i).1) K) u.base
def val (S : Domain) (K : ℕ) (u : Blob) (f : Trio) (i) :=
f.eval (u.ts i).1 (rk S K u) (u.ts i).2
lemma thin {S S' : Domain} {u : Blob} {K} {b c : ℝ} (h : S' ⊆ S) (hc : 0≤c) (hb:c < b)
(hi : ∀ i∈S', b ≤ (u.ts i).1 ∧ u.rk S K ≤ c) :
S'.card ≤ K := by
by_contra! he
obtain ⟨i,hh⟩ := card_pos.mp (lt_of_le_of_lt K.zero_le he)
let v:=fun i=>(u.ts i).1
have ht : S' ⊆ S.filter (fun i=> b ≤ v i) :=
fun j hk=>mem_filter.2 ⟨h hk,(hi j hk).1⟩
have hs := (@rank_ge _ S v K b (lt_of_le_of_lt hc hb)).mpr
(lt_of_lt_of_le he (card_le_card ht))
exact (not_le_of_gt hb) (le_trans hs (le_trans (le_max_left ..) (hi i hh).2))
lemma support_size {f : Trio} {t C} (h : TS t C f) (e:0<t)
(u : Blob) (S : Domain) (K : ℕ) :
(S.filter (fun i=>u.val S K f i≠0)).card ≤ K := by
apply thin (u:=u) (b:=t/8) (c:=t/40) (filter_subset ..) (by linarith) (by linarith)
intro i hk; have he: f.eval _ (u.rk S K) (u.ts i).2≠0:= (mem_filter.mp hk).2
constructor
· by_contra! hs; apply he
unfold Trio.eval; rw [h.shut _ (le_of_lt hs)]; ring
· by_contra! hs; apply he
unfold Trio.eval; rw [h.off _ (le_of_lt hs)]; ring
/-- Consistency with deterministic finite approximations for access. -/
structure Guess where
first : ℕ → ℝ
kth : ℝ
def acc (g : Guess) (u : Blob) (S : Domain) (K) (t : ℝ) :=
(∀ i∈S, |(u.ts i).1-g.first i|≤t/10000) ∧
|u.rk S K-g.kth|≤t/10000
/-- b=false exposes main, true exposes the first (precursor) witness
(for purposes of rank). -/
def expose (t : ℝ) (g : Guess) (b : Bool) (S : Domain) :=
if b then S.filter (fun i=> t/5 < g.first i ∧ g.kth < t*(15/1000))
else S.filter (fun i=> 5*t/12 < g.first i ∧ g.kth < t*(35/10000))
lemma expose_subset (S) (t) (g) (b) : expose t g b S ⊆ S := by
unfold expose; split <;> apply filter_subset
lemma has_room {t} {g u S K} (hg : acc g u S K t) (he:0<t) {b} {i} (h : i∈expose t g b S) :
(u.ts i).1 > (if b then t/6 else t/3) ∧
u.rk S K < (if b then t/50 else t/200) := by
obtain ⟨p,q⟩:=hg
obtain ⟨h1,h2⟩:=abs_le.1 (p i (expose_subset _ _ _ _ h))
obtain ⟨h3,h4⟩:=abs_le.1 q
cases b <;>
(simp only [expose,Bool.false_eq_true,ite_false,ite_true,mem_filter] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨-,a,b'⟩:=h
constructor <;> linarith)
lemma protects {t} {g u S K} (hg : acc g u S K t) (he:0<t) {b} {i} (h : i∈expose t g b S) :
u.val S K (suppT t b) i = 1 := by
obtain ⟨ha,hb⟩:= has_room hg he h
cases b <;> (
simp only [ite_false,ite_true,Bool.false_eq_true,val,suppT,Trio.eval] at *
rw [rising_top (by linarith) (le_of_lt ha), rising_bot (by linarith) (le_of_lt hb)]
ring)
lemma exposure_count {t} {g u S K} (hg : acc g u S K t) (he:0<t) (b) :
(expose t g b S).card ≤ K := by
refine thin (u:=u) (b:=t/6) (c:=t/50) (expose_subset ..) (by linarith)
(by linarith) (fun i h=>?_)
obtain ⟨p,q⟩:=has_room hg he h
cases b <;> (simp only [ite_false,ite_true,Bool.false_eq_true] at *; constructor <;> linarith)
lemma exposed_main {t} {g u S K} (hg : acc g u S K t) (he:0<t) {i} (hi:i∈S)
(v) {f} (hp : ∀ x≤t/2,f x=0)
(hh : u.val S K (mainT t f v) i≠0) : i∈expose t g false S := by
have e1 : t/2 < (u.ts i).1 := by
by_contra! h
apply hh
simp [mainT,val,Trio.eval,hp _ h]
have e2 : rk S K u<2*eta t := by
by_contra! h
apply hh
simp [mainT,val,Trio.eval, gate_shut he _ h]
obtain ⟨h1,h2⟩:=abs_le.1 (hg.1 i hi)
obtain ⟨h3,h4⟩:=abs_le.1 hg.2
unfold eta at e2
exact mem_filter.mpr ⟨hi,by linarith,by linarith⟩
lemma exposed_supp {t} {g u S K} (hg : acc g u S K t) (he:0<t) {i} (hi:i∈S)
(hh : u.val S K (suppT t false) i≠0) : i∈expose t g true S := by
have e1 : t/4 < (u.ts i).1 := by
by_contra! h; apply hh; unfold val
simp only [suppT,Bool.false_eq_true,ite_false,Trio.eval]
rw [rising_bot (by linarith) h]; ring
have e2 : u.rk S K < t/100 := by
by_contra! h; apply hh; unfold val
simp only [suppT,Bool.false_eq_true,ite_false,Trio.eval]
rw [rising_top (by linarith) h]; ring
obtain ⟨h1,h2⟩:=abs_le.1 (hg.1 i hi)
obtain ⟨h3,h4⟩:=abs_le.1 hg.2
exact mem_filter.mpr ⟨hi,by linarith,by linarith⟩
lemma missing_baseline {t} {g u S K} (hg : acc g u S K t) (he:0<t) (b) {i}
(hh : (u.ts i).1=u.base) : i∉expose t g b S := by
intro h
obtain ⟨p,q⟩:=has_room hg he h
have hA : u.base≤u.rk S K:=le_max_right ..
cases b <;> simp at p q <;> linarith
end Blob
end
end ExactDerandomization.At
end
section
namespace ExactDerandomization.At
noncomputable section
open Analysis Hie Finset
/-- choose incoming cap after pilot column thresholds. Use ranking with same
convention (zero-based; cap at c, c+1st score gate). -/
def clim (p : Const) := (1+32*(128 + 4*(p.J+1)))*128
lemma clim_bound (p : Const) : (1+32*limitJ p.J)*128 ≤ (clim p+1:ℝ) := by
unfold limitJ clim; push_cast; linarith
structure Grid where
p : Const
z : ℝ
src : Domain
dst : Domain
narrow : Domain
sp : Bool
def shutoff (x : ℝ) := 1-rising (1/4) (1/2) x
lemma shutoff_mem (x) : in01 (shutoff x) := by
obtain ⟨h,e⟩:=rising_mem (1/4) (1/2) x
unfold shutoff in01; constructor <;> linarith
lemma shutoff_full {x} (h:x≤1/4) : shutoff x=1 := by
unfold shutoff; rw [rising_bot (by norm_num) h]; norm_num
lemma shutoff_zero {x} (h:1/2≤x) : shutoff x=0 := by
unfold shutoff; rw [rising_top (by norm_num) h]; norm_num
namespace Grid
variable (t : Grid) (g : ℕ → Blob)
def pre (h : Trio) (mask : Bool) (x y : ℕ) :=
if x∈ t.src ∧ y∈ t.dst ∧ (mask=false ∨ y∈ t.narrow) then
(g x).val t.dst t.p.K h y
else 0
def witness (b) := t.pre g (suppT t.z b) false
def rankin (y) := rank t.src (fun x=> t.witness g false x y) (clim t.p)
def incG (y) := if t.sp then shutoff (t.rankin g y) else 1
def result (f : Trio) (b) (col : ℕ → ℝ) (x y) :=
t.pre g f b x y*t.incG g y*col y
def present (f : ℕ→Blob.Guess) (b : Bool) (x) :=
if x∈t.src then Blob.expose t.z (f x) b t.dst else ∅
def inc (f : ℕ→Blob.Guess) (y) :=
t.src.filter fun x=>y∈t.present f false x
def paired (f : ℕ→Blob.Guess) (x) :=
if t.sp then (t.present f false x).filter fun y=> (t.inc f y).card ≤ clim t.p
else t.present f false x
def Agree (f : ℕ→Blob.Guess) : Prop :=
∀ x∈t.src, Blob.acc (f x) (g x) t.dst t.p.K t.z
lemma incG_bounds (y) : in01 (t.incG g y) := by
unfold incG; split
· apply shutoff_mem
· unfold in01; norm_num
lemma pres_range {h x y b} (e : y∈t.present h b x) : x∈t.src ∧ y∈t.dst := by
unfold present at e; split at e
· refine ⟨by assumption, (Blob.expose_subset _ _ _ _) e⟩
· simp at e
lemma pres_card {f} (he:0<t.z) (h:t.Agree g f) (x b) : (t.present f b x).card ≤ t.p.K := by
unfold present; split
· next e=>exact Blob.exposure_count (h x e) he b
· simp
lemma protect {f} {x y b} (he:0<t.z) (h:t.Agree g f) (hg : y∈t.present f b x) :
t.witness g b x y=1 := by
obtain ⟨hs,hk⟩:= t.pres_range hg
simp only [present,hs,ite_true] at hg
simp only [witness,pre,hk,hs,true_or,true_and,ite_true]
exact Blob.protects (h x hs) he hg
lemma has_main {f} (he : 0<t.z) (h:t.Agree g f)
{mask v : Bool} {w : ℝ → ℝ} (hw:∀ x ≤ t.z/2,w x=0)
{x y} (hi : t.pre g (mainT t.z w v) mask x y ≠ 0) :
y ∈ t.present f false x := by
unfold pre at hi; split at hi
· next e=>
obtain ⟨e,s,-⟩:=e; unfold present; rw [ite_eq_left e]
exact Blob.exposed_main (h x e) he s v hw hi
· exact (hi rfl).elim
lemma has_witness {f x y} (he : 0<t.z) (h:t.Agree g f) (hi:t.witness g false x y≠0) :
y∈ t.present f true x := by
unfold witness pre at hi; split at hi
· next e=>
obtain ⟨e,s,-⟩:=e; unfold present; rw [ite_eq_left e]
exact Blob.exposed_supp (h x e) he s hi
· exact (hi rfl).elim
lemma paired_sub (f x) : t.paired f x ⊆ t.present f false x := by
unfold paired; split
· apply filter_subset
· rfl
lemma degree {f x} (he:0<t.z) (h:t.Agree g f) : (t.paired f x).card ≤ t.p.K :=
le_trans (card_le_card (t.paired_sub f x)) (pres_card t g he h ..)
lemma degree_in (f) (w) (h : t.sp=true) (S : Domain) :
(S.filter fun x=> w∈t.paired f x).card≤clim t.p := by
by_cases he:(t.inc f w).card ≤ clim t.p
· apply le_trans (card_le_card ?_) he
intro i hi
have e := t.paired_sub f i (mem_filter.1 hi).2
exact mem_filter.2 ⟨(t.pres_range e).1,e⟩
have hh : S.filter (fun x=> w∈t.paired f x)= ∅ := by
ext i; simp [paired,h,he]
simp [hh]
lemma nonzero_present {f w x y v b col} (he:0<t.z) (h:t.Agree g f)
(hw:∀ x ≤ t.z/2,w x=0)
(hz:t.result g (mainT t.z w v) b col x y ≠ 0) :
y∈ t.paired f x := by
unfold result at hz
have hi : y ∈ t.present f false x:= has_main t g he h hw (by intro e; apply hz; rw [e]; ring)
unfold paired; split
· next s=>
apply mem_filter.mpr ⟨hi,?_⟩
by_contra! hn
have hh : 1 ≤ t.rankin g y := by
apply (rank_ge (by norm_num)).mpr (lt_of_lt_of_le hn (card_le_card ?_))
intro i hh
obtain ⟨e,w⟩:=mem_filter.1 hh
exact mem_filter.2 ⟨e,le_of_eq (Eq.symm (t.protect g he h w))⟩
apply hz
rw [incG,ite_eq_left s,shutoff_zero (by linarith : 1/2≤ t.rankin g y)]
ring
· exact hi
lemma pre_support {C f b} (_:TS t.z C f) (_ : 0<t.z) (x y)
(hh:t.pre g f b x y≠0) : x∈t.src ∧ y∈t.dst := by
unfold pre at hh; split at hh
· next e=> exact ⟨e.1,e.2.1⟩
exact (hh rfl).elim
lemma pre_count {C f b} (h:TS t.z C f) (he : 0<t.z) (x) (A : Domain) :
(A.filter fun i=> t.pre g f b x i≠0).card≤t.p.K := by
refine le_trans (card_le_card ?_) (Blob.support_size h he (g x) t.dst t.p.K)
intro i hi; have hk:= (mem_filter.1 hi).2
unfold pre at hk; split at hk
· next e=> exact mem_filter.2 ⟨e.2.1,hk⟩
exact (hk rfl).elim
end Grid
end
end ExactDerandomization.At
end
section
namespace ExactDerandomization.At
noncomputable section
open Analysis Hie Finset
structure Ask where
p : Const
S : Domain
G : Mat
u : ℕ
a : ℕ
t : ℕ
z : ℝ
sp : Bool
namespace Ask
variable (q : Ask)
variable {n : ℕ} [Fact n.Prime]
def hand (s t : Channel n) : Grid :=
⟨q.p,q.z,retain q.u q.S s,retain q.a q.S t,retain q.t q.S t,q.sp⟩
def d (x y) := q.G x y / rate q.a
def raw (x : ℕ) (s : Vec) : Blob :=
⟨0,fun y=>(q.d x y,s y)⟩
def botRow (x) := q.raw x fun _=>0
def bath (s t : Channel n) (x y) :=
(q.hand s t).result q.botRow (prepT q.z) false (fun _=>1) x y
/-- two independent retentions at rates u and t -/
def two (x y : ℕ) (f : Channel n → Channel n → ℝ) :=
atP q.u (x:ZMod n) (fun s=> atP q.t (y:ZMod n) (f s))
def tooth (q) (n : ℕ) [Fact n.Prime] (x y) :=
two (n:=n) q x y (fun s t=> bath q s t x y)
def rawplus (s : Channel n) (x) :=
q.raw x fun y=> if y∈ retain q.t q.S s then zeta* q.tooth n x y else 0
def atomTrue (f : ℝ → ℝ) (col : Vec) (s t : Channel n) (x y) :=
(q.hand s t).result (q.rawplus t) (mainT q.z f true) true col x y
lemma hth (x) (s) (t : Channel n) :
gate q.z ((q.raw x s).rk (retain q.a q.S t) q.p.K)= throttle q.S q.G q.a q.p.K x t q.z := by
rw [Blob.rk,max_eq_left]; rfl; exact rank_nn _ _ _
lemma gate1 (s t : Channel n) (y) :
(q.hand s t).incG (q.rawplus t) y=(q.hand s t).incG q.botRow y := by
have hs x : (q.hand s t).witness (q.rawplus t) false x y=
(q.hand s t).witness q.botRow false x y := by
unfold Grid.witness Grid.pre; split
· simp [Trio.eval, Blob.val,suppT,rawplus,raw,botRow,Blob.rk]
· rfl
unfold Grid.incG Grid.rankin; simp_rw [hs]
lemma base_bath (s t : Channel n) (x y) (h:x∈(q.hand s t).src) (e:y∈(q.hand s t).dst) :
q.bath s t x y=prep q.z (q.d x y)*throttle q.S q.G q.a q.p.K x t q.z *
(q.hand s t).incG q.botRow y := by
simp only [bath,Grid.result,Grid.pre,h,e,true_or,true_and,ite_true,mul_one,
Blob.val,Trio.eval,prepT, mainT,Bool.false_eq_true,ite_false]
dsimp only [hand,botRow]
rw [q.hth]; rfl
lemma bath_mem (s t : Channel n) (x y : ℕ) :
in01 (q.bath s t x y) := by
by_cases h : x∈(q.hand s t).src ∧ y∈(q.hand s t).dst
· rw [q.base_bath s t x y h.1 h.2]
have H (x y) (h:in01 x) (e:in01 y) : in01 (x*y) :=
⟨mul_nonneg h.1 e.1,(mul_le_mul h.2 e.2 e.1 zero_le_one).trans_eq (one_mul _)⟩
exact H _ _ (H _ _ (rising_mem ..) (gate_mem ..)) ((q.hand s t).incG_bounds ..)
· have e : q.bath s t x y=0 := by unfold bath Grid.result Grid.pre; split <;> grind
rw [e]; unfold in01; norm_num
lemma tooth_mem (x y) : in01 (q.tooth n x y) :=
expect_mem fun _=>expect_mem fun _=>q.bath_mem ..
lemma two_mono {x y : ℕ} {f g : Channel n → Channel n→ℝ}
(h:∀ s t, hit q.u (x:ZMod n) s → hit q.t (y:ZMod n) t → f s t ≤ g s t) :
q.two x y f≤q.two x y g :=
av_mono fun _=>av_mono fun _=>h _ _ (hit_open ..) (hit_open ..)
lemma two_rw {x y : ℕ} {f g : Channel n→Channel n→ℝ}
(h:∀ s t, hit q.u (x:ZMod n) s → hit q.t (y:ZMod n) t → f s t = g s t) :
q.two x y f=q.two x y g :=
le_antisymm (q.two_mono fun s t he hi=>le_of_eq (h s t he hi))
(q.two_mono fun s t he hi=>le_of_eq (Eq.symm (h s t he hi)))
lemma valid_broad (s t : Channel n) (x y) (ht : q.a≤q.t)
(hx:x∈q.S) (hy:y∈q.S)
(h : hit q.u (x:ZMod n) s) (e : hit q.t (y:ZMod n) t) :
x∈(q.hand s t).src ∧ y∈(q.hand s t).dst ∧ y∈(q.hand s t).narrow :=
⟨mem_filter.2 ⟨hx,h⟩,mem_filter.2 ⟨hy,contained q.t q.a ht e⟩,
mem_filter.2 ⟨hy,e⟩⟩
lemma premask (s t : Channel n) (x y) (f : ℝ→ℝ) (col : Vec)
(h : x∈(q.hand s t).src) (e : y∈(q.hand s t).dst) (ht : y∈(q.hand s t).narrow) :
q.atomTrue f col s t x y = f (q.d x y)*throttle q.S q.G q.a q.p.K x t q.z *
divisor (zeta*q.tooth n x y)*(q.hand s t).incG q.botRow y*col y := by
simp only [atomTrue,Grid.result,q.gate1,Grid.pre,h,e,ht,or_true,true_and,ite_true,
Blob.val, Trio.eval,mainT]
rw [show (q.rawplus t x).ts y=(q.d x y,zeta*q.tooth n x y) from (by
simp [rawplus,raw,show y∈retain q.t q.S t from ht])]
have he := q.hth x (fun y=>if y∈retain q.t q.S t then zeta*q.tooth n x y else 0) t
change gate _ ((q.rawplus t x).rk _ _) = _ at he
dsimp only [hand]; rw [he]
lemma tooth0 {x y} (hz:0<q.z) (h : q.d x y ≤ q.z/2) : q.tooth n x y=0 := by
have e s t : q.bath (n:=n) s t x y=0 := by
have e' : prep q.z (q.d x y)=0:=rising_bot (by linarith) h
unfold bath Grid.result Grid.pre; split
· simp only [prepT,mainT,Blob.val,Trio.eval,botRow,raw,e']; ring
· ring
simp [tooth,two,atP,e,av_zero]
structure Valid (q : Ask) (col : Vec) (n : ℕ) [Fact n.Prime] : Prop where
adm : legal n q.S
lo : delta≤ q.z
src : 2^q.u≤n
tok : q.a≤q.t
entry : 2^q.a≤n
nonneg : ∀ i j,0≤ q.G i j
row : ∀ x, wt q.S q.G x ≤ q.p.T+1
sparse : q.sp=true → q.z=A ∧ q.a≤q.u ∧ ∀ y∈q.S,col y≠0 →
(rowhi q.S q.G q.a y).card*(rate q.a) ≤ limitJ q.p.J
lemma row_fail {col} (h : Valid q col n) {x y : ℕ} (hy:y∈q.S) :
atP q.t (↑y:ZMod n) (cost q.S q.G q.a q.p.K x q.z) ≤ 1/128 := by
have ht := q.p.KOK
have he:=h.lo
apply gate_bound (lt_of_lt_of_le dp h.lo) h.entry h.nonneg h.row h.adm (mem_range.1 (h.adm hy))
refine le_trans ?_ ht
have h1 : 0< eta q.z := by have := dp; unfold eta; linarith
have h2 : 0<eta delta:=by norm_num [eta,A,delta]
gcongr; unfold eta; apply div_le_div_of_nonneg_right he; norm_num
def lbad (s t : Channel n) (y : ℕ) : ℝ :=
if (q.hand s t).incG q.botRow y=1 then 0 else 1
lemma col_fail {col} (h : Valid q col n) {x y : ℕ} (hx:x∈q.S) (hy:y∈q.S)
(e : col y ≠ 0) (t : Channel n) :
atP q.u (↑x:ZMod n) (fun s=>q.lbad s t y) ≤ 1/128 := by
by_cases he:q.sp=true
· obtain ⟨h1,h2,H⟩:=h.sparse he
let W:=rowhi q.S q.G q.a y
have hm : (W.card:ℝ)*rate q.a ≤ limitJ q.p.J := H y hy e
have hs (s) :
(clim q.p+1:ℝ)*q.lbad s t y ≤ tally q.u W s := by
unfold lbad; split
· rw [mul_zero]; unfold tally; positivity
· next hbad=>
rw [mul_one]
let g:=q.hand s t
let f i:=g.witness q.botRow false i y
have hn : 1/4 < rank g.src f (clim q.p) := by
by_contra! hc
apply hbad
simp only [Grid.incG,hand,he,ite_true]
exact shutoff_full hc
have hk := (rank_gt (by norm_num)).1 hn
have hw : (g.src.filter fun i=> 1/4 < f i) ⊆ retain q.u W s := by
intro i hi; obtain ⟨hi,hv⟩:=mem_filter.1 hi
obtain ⟨hi',hi''⟩:=mem_filter.1 (show i ∈ retain q.u q.S s from hi)
refine mem_filter.2 ⟨mem_filter.2 ⟨hi',?_⟩,hi''⟩
by_contra! hle
have hz : q.d i y < 2*delta := (div_lt_iff₀ (rate_pos q.a)).2 hle
refine ne_of_gt (lt_trans (show 0<(1/4:ℝ) by norm_num) hv) ?_
unfold f Grid.witness Grid.pre; split
· simp only [Blob.val,botRow,raw,Trio.eval,suppT,g,hand,h1,Bool.false_eq_true,
ite_false]
rw [rising_bot (by norm_num [A]) (show q.d i y≤A/4 from by
unfold delta A at *; linarith)]
ring
· rfl
have hu : clim q.p<(retain q.u W s).card := lt_of_lt_of_le hk (card_le_card hw)
unfold tally
exact_mod_cast hu
have hp := tally_cond (S:=W) (fun i hi=>h.adm (mem_filter.1 hi).1) h.src
(j:=q.u) x (mem_range.1 (h.adm hx))
have hu :
(clim q.p+1:ℝ)*atP q.u (↑x:ZMod n) (fun s=>q.lbad s t y) ≤
atP q.u (↑x:ZMod n) (tally q.u W) := by
unfold atP; rw [← av_cmul]; exact av_mono (fun _=> hs _)
have ha : rate q.u ≤ rate q.a := by unfold rate; gcongr; norm_num
have H := clim_bound q.p
have hq : 1+W.card*(32:ℝ)*rate q.u≤1+32*limitJ q.p.J := by
nlinarith [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ha (show 0≤(W.card:ℝ) by positivity)]
apply le_of_mul_le_mul_left _ (show 0 < (clim q.p+1:ℝ) by positivity)
linarith
· simp [atP,lbad,hand,Grid.incG,he,av_zero]
set_option maxHeartbeats 1000000 in
lemma normalized_mean {col} (h : Valid q col n) {x y : ℕ} (hx:x∈q.S) (hy:y∈q.S)
{f : ℝ→ℝ} (hf : ∀ x ≤ q.z,f x=0) :
q.two x y (n:=n) (fun s t=> q.atomTrue f col s t x y) = f (q.d x y)*col y := by
let b (s t : Channel n) := throttle q.S q.G q.a q.p.K x t q.z*(q.hand s t).incG q.botRow y
let w := q.tooth n x y
let p:=q.two x y b
have ht : q.two x y (n:=n) (fun s t=> q.atomTrue f col s t x y)
= p*(f (q.d x y)*col y*divisor (zeta*w)) := by
unfold p two atP; rw [← av_mulc]
simp_rw [← av_mulc]
apply congrArg av; ext s; apply congrArg av; ext t
let i := openP q.u (↑x:ZMod n) s
let j := openP q.t (↑y:ZMod n) t
obtain ⟨a,a',a''⟩:= q.valid_broad i j x y h.tok hx hy (hit_open ..) (hit_open ..)
change q.atomTrue f col i j x y=b i j*_
rw [q.premask i j x y f col a a' a'']
unfold b w; ring
rw [ht]
by_cases hg:f (q.d x y)=0
· rw [hg]; ring
by_cases he:col y=0
· rw [he]; ring
have hh:w=p := by
have he' : prep q.z (q.d x y)=1 := by
have H := lt_of_not_ge (show ¬ q.d x y ≤ q.z from fun h=>hg (hf _ h))
have e:=lt_of_lt_of_le dp h.lo
exact rising_top (by linarith) (by linarith)
apply two_rw
intro s t hk ht
obtain ⟨a,a',-⟩:= q.valid_broad s t x y h.tok hx hy hk ht
rw [q.base_bath s t x y a a',he',one_mul]
have hu : 1/2 ≤ p := by
let v (t : Channel n) := cost q.S q.G q.a q.p.K x q.z t
have hm s t : 1-v t-q.lbad s t y ≤ b s t := by
obtain ⟨a1,a2⟩:= (q.hand s t).incG_bounds q.botRow y
let w:=throttle q.S q.G q.a q.p.K x t q.z
obtain ⟨a3,a4⟩:= (show in01 w from gate_mem ..)
have hw : 0≤b s t:=mul_nonneg a3 a1
unfold lbad v cost
split <;> split <;> simp_all [b] ; linarith
let u:=q.two x y (fun s t=>1-v t-q.lbad s t y)
have hz:u≤p:=q.two_mono fun s t _ _=>hm s t
have hrv:= q.row_fail h (x:=x) hy
have hcv (t) := q.col_fail h hx hy he t
have hh : 1/2≤u := by
unfold u two atP
rw [av_swap]
simp only [av_sub,av_const]
have hl :
av (fun t:pc n q.t=> atP q.u (↑x:ZMod n)
(fun s=>q.lbad s (openP q.t (↑y:ZMod n) t) y)) ≤ 1/128 := by
refine le_trans (b:=av (fun _ :pc n q.t=>1/128)) (av_mono fun i=>hcv _) ?_
rw [av_const]
dsimp only [atP] at hl hrv; unfold v
linarith
linarith
have hz:= q.tooth_mem (n:=n) x y |>.2
change w≤1 at hz
have hw : den (zeta*w)=p := by
have h1:= mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hu (le_of_lt zp)
have h2:= mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hz (le_of_lt zp)
unfold den clip
rw [max_eq_right (by rw [hh]; linarith),min_eq_right (by linarith),hh]
field_simp [ne_of_gt zp]
rw [divisor,hw]
field_simp [ne_of_gt (show 0<p by linarith)]
end Ask
end
end ExactDerandomization.At
end
end OAI