roseking's picture
Add lean source and binary files (part 62)
2f887db verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
5.31 kB
import OAI.Computability.PerfectCompleteness.Foundations.PartialTableInverse
namespace OAI
section
namespace PerfectCompleteness.MatrixErasure
noncomputable section
open scoped BigOperators Classical
open UniqueGamesTheorem.Fourier.MatrixCharacters
open PerfectCompleteness.PartialTableInverse
variable {Ω Y : Type*}
def erase (f : Ω → Option Y) (T : Ω → Prop) (X : Ω) : Option Y :=
if T X then none else f X
def uniformMass [Fintype Ω] (T : Ω → Prop) : ℝ :=
𝔼 X, if T X then (1 : ℝ) else 0
@[simp] theorem erase_eq_none_of (f : Ω → Option Y) (T : Ω → Prop)
{X : Ω} (hX : T X) : erase f T X = none := by
simp [erase, hX]
theorem erase_eq_of_not (f : Ω → Option Y) (T : Ω → Prop)
{X : Ω} (hX : ¬T X) : erase f T X = f X := by
simp [erase, hX]
theorem erase_eq_some_iff (f : Ω → Option Y) (T : Ω → Prop) (X : Ω) (y : Y) :
erase f T X = some y ↔ ¬T X ∧ f X = some y := by
by_cases hX : T X <;> simp [erase, hX]
theorem indicator_erase_le (f : Ω → Option Y) (T : Ω → Prop) (y : Y) (X : Ω) :
indicator (erase f T) y X ≤ indicator f y X := by
by_cases hX : T X
· simp only [indicator, erase, ite_eq_left hX, reduceCtorEq, ite_false]
split_ifs <;> norm_num
· simp [indicator, erase, hX]
theorem definedEquality_erase (f : Ω → Option Y) (T : Ω → Prop) (X X' : Ω) :
definedEquality (erase f T) X X' =
if T X ∨ T X' then 0 else definedEquality f X X' := by
by_cases hX : T X <;> by_cases hX' : T X' <;>
simp [definedEquality, erase, hX, hX']
theorem definedEquality_le_one (f : Ω → Option Y) (X X' : Ω) :
definedEquality f X X' ≤ 1 := by
unfold definedEquality
split_ifs <;> norm_num
theorem definedEquality_nonneg (f : Ω → Option Y) (X X' : Ω) :
0 ≤ definedEquality f X X' := by
unfold definedEquality
split_ifs <;> norm_num
theorem definedEquality_erase_le (f : Ω → Option Y) (T : Ω → Prop) (X X' : Ω) :
definedEquality (erase f T) X X' ≤ definedEquality f X X' := by
rw [definedEquality_erase]
split_ifs
· exact definedEquality_nonneg f X X'
· exact le_rfl
theorem definedEquality_le_erase_add (f : Ω → Option Y) (T : Ω → Prop) (X X' : Ω) :
definedEquality f X X' ≤ definedEquality (erase f T) X X' +
(if T X then (1 : ℝ) else 0) + (if T X' then (1 : ℝ) else 0) := by
have hbound := definedEquality_le_one f X X'
by_cases hX : T X <;> by_cases hX' : T X' <;>
simp [definedEquality_erase, hX, hX'] <;> linarith
theorem uniformMass_nonneg [Fintype Ω] (T : Ω → Prop) : 0 ≤ uniformMass T := by
apply Finset.expect_nonneg
intro X _
split_ifs <;> norm_num
theorem expect_add_right [AddGroup Ω] [Fintype Ω] (g : Ω → ℝ) (v : Ω) :
(𝔼 X, g (X + v)) = (𝔼 X, g X) :=
Fintype.expect_equiv (Equiv.addRight v) _ _ (fun _ => rfl)
variable {E F : Type*}
[AddCommGroup E] [Module F2 E] [AddCommGroup F] [Module F2 F]
[Fintype F] [Fintype (E →ₗ[F2] F2)] [Fintype (E →ₗ[F2] F)]
omit [Fintype F] in
theorem step_second_marginal (g : (E →ₗ[F2] F) → ℝ) (a : F) :
(𝔼 X, 𝔼 h : E →ₗ[F2] F2, g (X + h.smulRight a)) = (𝔼 X, g X) := by
rw [Finset.expect_comm]
simp_rw [expect_add_right]
exact Fintype.expect_const _
theorem nonzero_second_marginal [Nontrivial F] (g : (E →ₗ[F2] F) → ℝ) :
(𝔼 a : {a : F // a ≠ 0},
𝔼 X, 𝔼 h : E →ₗ[F2] F2, g (X + h.smulRight a.val)) = (𝔼 X, g X) := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := exists_ne (0 : F)
let : Nonempty {a : F // a ≠ 0} := ⟨⟨a, ha⟩⟩
simp_rw [step_second_marginal]
exact Fintype.expect_const _
omit [Fintype F] in
theorem stepAgreement_erase_bound (f : (E →ₗ[F2] F) → Option Y)
(T : (E →ₗ[F2] F) → Prop) (a : F) :
stepAgreement f a ≤ stepAgreement (erase f T) a + 2 * uniformMass T := by
have havg : stepAgreement f a ≤
𝔼 X, 𝔼 h : E →ₗ[F2] F2,
(definedEquality (erase f T) X (X + h.smulRight a) +
(if T X then (1 : ℝ) else 0) +
(if T (X + h.smulRight a) then (1 : ℝ) else 0)) := by
apply Finset.expect_le_expect
intro X _
apply Finset.expect_le_expect
intro h _
exact definedEquality_le_erase_add f T X (X + h.smulRight a)
simp_rw [Finset.expect_add_distrib, Fintype.expect_const] at havg
rw [step_second_marginal (fun X => if T X then (1 : ℝ) else 0) a] at havg
change stepAgreement f a ≤
stepAgreement (erase f T) a + uniformMass T + uniformMass T at havg
linarith
theorem nonzeroAgreement_erase [Nontrivial F] (f : (E →ₗ[F2] F) → Option Y)
(T : (E →ₗ[F2] F) → Prop) :
nonzeroAgreement f - 2 * uniformMass T ≤ nonzeroAgreement (erase f T) := by
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := exists_ne (0 : F)
let : Nonempty {a : F // a ≠ 0} := ⟨⟨a, ha⟩⟩
have havg : nonzeroAgreement f ≤
𝔼 a : {a : F // a ≠ 0}, (stepAgreement (erase f T) a.val + 2 * uniformMass T) := by
unfold nonzeroAgreement
apply Finset.expect_le_expect
intro a _
exact stepAgreement_erase_bound f T a.val
simp only [Finset.expect_add_distrib, Fintype.expect_const] at havg
change nonzeroAgreement f ≤ nonzeroAgreement (erase f T) + 2 * uniformMass T at havg
linarith
end
end PerfectCompleteness.MatrixErasure
end
end OAI