roseking's picture
Add lean source and binary files (part 64)
92416a2 verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
49.1 kB
import OAI.Computability.WitnessedChoice.GridGeometry
namespace OAI
namespace WitnessedChoice
noncomputable section
open Classical
namespace AnchoredTree
variable {V : Type} [Fintype V]
def key (G : SimpleGraph V) (α : Fin 4 → V) (v : V) : Lex (Fin 4 → ℕ) :=
toLex (fun i => G.dist (α i) v)
def Resolving (G : SimpleGraph V) (α : Fin 4 → V) : Prop := Function.Injective (key G α)
def Eligible (G : SimpleGraph V) (r v w : V) : Prop := G.Adj v w ∧ G.dist r w + 1 = G.dist r v
omit [Fintype V] in
lemma root_lt (G : SimpleGraph V) (hG : G.Connected) (α : Fin 4 → V)
(v : V) (hv : v ≠ α 0) : key G α (α 0) < key G α v := by
refine ⟨0,?_,?_⟩
· intro j hj; exact (Fin.not_lt_zero j hj).elim
· change G.dist (α 0) (α 0) < G.dist (α 0) v
rw [G.dist_self]
exact Nat.pos_of_ne_zero (fun h => hv ((hG (α 0) v).dist_eq_zero_iff.mp h).symm)
omit [Fintype V] in
lemma least_iff_root (G : SimpleGraph V) (hG : G.Connected) (α : Fin 4 → V) (v : V) :
(∀ w, ¬key G α w < key G α v) ↔ v = α 0 := by
constructor
· intro h; by_contra hn; exact h _ (root_lt G hG α v hn)
· rintro rfl w hw
by_cases h : w = α 0
· subst w; exact lt_irrefl _ hw
· exact (lt_asymm hw (root_lt G hG α w h))
omit [Fintype V] in
lemma exists_eligible (G : SimpleGraph V) (hG : G.Connected) (r v : V) (hv : v ≠ r) :
∃ w, Eligible G r v w := by
obtain ⟨p,hp⟩ := hG.exists_walk_length_eq_dist v r
cases p with
| nil => exact (hv rfl).elim
| @cons _ w _ hadj q =>
refine ⟨w,hadj,?_⟩
have hle := G.dist_le q
have hd := hadj.diff_dist_adj (u := r)
simp only [SimpleGraph.Walk.length_cons] at hp
rw [G.dist_comm (u := v) (v := r)] at hp
rw [G.dist_comm (u := w) (v := r)] at hle
omega
omit [Fintype V] in
lemma exists_min_key (G : SimpleGraph V) (α : Fin 4 → V) (D : Finset V) (hD : D.Nonempty) :
∃ v ∈ D, ∀ w ∈ D, ¬key G α w < key G α v := by
let K := D.image (key G α)
have hK : K.Nonempty := hD.image _
obtain ⟨v,hv,he⟩ := Finset.mem_image.mp (Finset.min'_mem K hK)
refine ⟨v,hv,?_⟩
intro w hw hlt
have hm := Finset.min'_le K (key G α w) (Finset.mem_image.mpr ⟨w,hw,rfl⟩)
rw [←he] at hm
exact (not_lt_of_ge hm) hlt
lemma exists_parent (G : SimpleGraph V) (hG : G.Connected) (α : Fin 4 → V)
(v : V) (hv : v ≠ α 0) :
∃ w, Eligible G (α 0) v w ∧ ∀ z, Eligible G (α 0) v z → ¬key G α z < key G α w := by
obtain ⟨w,hw⟩ := exists_eligible G hG (α 0) v hv
obtain ⟨z,hz,hm⟩ := exists_min_key G α (Finset.univ.filter (Eligible G (α 0) v))
⟨w,Finset.mem_filter.mpr ⟨Finset.mem_univ _,hw⟩⟩
exact ⟨z,(Finset.mem_filter.mp hz).2,fun y hy => hm y (Finset.mem_filter.mpr ⟨Finset.mem_univ _,hy⟩)⟩
def parent (G : SimpleGraph V) (hG : G.Connected) (α : Fin 4 → V) (v : V) : V :=
if hv : v = α 0 then α 0 else (exists_parent G hG α v hv).choose
lemma parent_property (G : SimpleGraph V) (hG : G.Connected) (α : Fin 4 → V)
(v : V) (hv : v ≠ α 0) :
Eligible G (α 0) v (parent G hG α v) ∧
∀ z, Eligible G (α 0) v z → ¬key G α z < key G α (parent G hG α v) := by
rw [parent,dite_eq_right hv]
exact (exists_parent G hG α v hv).choose_spec
def rooted (G : SimpleGraph V) (hG : G.Connected) (α : Fin 4 → V) : TreeTest.RootedTree V where
root := α 0
parent := parent G hG α
level := G.dist (α 0)
parent_lower v hv := by have h := (parent_property G hG α v hv).1.2; omega
lemma parent_iff (G : SimpleGraph V) (hG : G.Connected) (α : Fin 4 → V)
(hα : Resolving G α) (v w : V) :
(Eligible G (α 0) v w ∧ ∀ z, Eligible G (α 0) v z → ¬key G α z < key G α w) ↔
v ≠ α 0 ∧ (rooted G hG α).parent v = w := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hw,hm⟩
have hv : v ≠ α 0 := by intro hh; have hd := hw.2; rw [hh,G.dist_self] at hd; omega
refine ⟨hv,?_⟩
have hp := parent_property G hG α v hv
apply hα
exact le_antisymm (le_of_not_gt (hp.2 w hw)) (le_of_not_gt (hm _ hp.1))
· rintro ⟨hv,rfl⟩
exact parent_property G hG α v hv
end AnchoredTree
end
end WitnessedChoice
namespace WitnessedChoice.BGS
noncomputable section
open Classical WitnessedSeparation WitnessedSeparation.Hereditary QuotedTerm
namespace QuotedFormula
variable {A V : Type} [Fintype A] [Fintype V] {k : ℕ}
lemma meaning_vertexLt (S : Input A) (env : Fin k → HF A)
(ats R ut vt : QuotedTerm k) (code : V → HF A) (hc : Function.Injective code)
(G : SimpleGraph V) (hG : G.Connected) (α : Fin 4 → V) (u v : V)
(hα : ats.meaning S env = tupleCode (List.ofFn (code ∘ α)))
(hR : R.meaning S env = ofFinset ((BFS.closure G (Fintype.card A)).image (distanceCode code)))
(hu : ut.meaning S env = code u) (hv : vt.meaning S env = code v)
(hcard : Fintype.card V ≤ Fintype.card A) :
(vertexLt ats R ut vt).meaning S env ↔ AnchoredTree.key G α u < AnchoredTree.key G α v := by
have hdU (i : Fin 4) : (distanceAt R (ats.component i.val) ut).meaning S env = ordinal (G.dist (α i) u) :=
meaning_distanceAt S env R _ _ code hc G hG _ _ hR
(meaning_component_ofFn S env ats (code ∘ α) hα i) hu hcard
have hdV (i : Fin 4) : (distanceAt R (ats.component i.val) vt).meaning S env = ordinal (G.dist (α i) v) :=
meaning_distanceAt S env R _ _ code hc G hG _ _ hR
(meaning_component_ofFn S env ats (code ∘ α) hα i) hv hcard
simp only [vertexLt,meaning_anyFin,meaning_and,meaning_allFin,meaning_mem,hdU,hdV,
ordinal_mem_elements]
change (∃ i : Fin 4, (∀ j : Fin 4, _) ∧ _) ↔ _
have hm (i j : Fin 4) :
(if j.val < i.val then eq (distanceAt R (ats.component j.val) ut)
(distanceAt R (ats.component j.val) vt) else truth).meaning S env ↔
(j < i → G.dist (α j) u = G.dist (α j) v) := by
split_ifs with h
· simp only [meaning_eq,hdU,hdV,ordinal_injective.eq_iff]
simp only [Fin.lt_def,h,true_implies]
· simp [truth, Fin.lt_def, h]
simp only [hm]
rfl
lemma meaning_resolving (S : Input A) (env : Fin k → HF A)
(ats VT R : QuotedTerm k) (code : V → HF A) (hc : Function.Injective code)
(G : SimpleGraph V) (hG : G.Connected) (α : Fin 4 → V)
(hα : ats.meaning S env = tupleCode (List.ofFn (code ∘ α)))
(hV : VT.meaning S env = ofFinset (Finset.univ.image code))
(hR : R.meaning S env = ofFinset ((BFS.closure G (Fintype.card A)).image (distanceCode code)))
(hcard : Fintype.card V ≤ Fintype.card A) :
(resolving ats VT R).meaning S env ↔ AnchoredTree.Resolving G α := by
simp only [resolving,meaning_allIn,meaning_imp,meaning_allFin,meaning_eq,meaning_var,
QuotedTerm.meaning_up,hV,elements_ofFinset,Finset.mem_image,Finset.mem_univ,true_and,
forall_exists_index,forall_apply_eq_imp_iff,Fin.cons_zero,Fin.cons_one]
have hd (u v : V) (i : Fin 4) (w : V) (wt : QuotedTerm (k+2))
(hw : wt.meaning S (Fin.cons (code v) (Fin.cons (code u) env)) = code w) :
(distanceAt R.up.up (ats.up.up.component i.val) wt).meaning S
(Fin.cons (code v) (Fin.cons (code u) env)) = ordinal (G.dist (α i) w) := by
apply meaning_distanceAt S _ _ _ _ code hc G hG _ _ _ _ hw hcard
· simpa only [QuotedTerm.meaning_up] using hR
· apply meaning_component_ofFn S _ _ (code ∘ α) _ i
simpa only [QuotedTerm.meaning_up] using hα
have hd₁ (u v : V) (i : Fin 4) := hd u v i u (var 1) (by simp)
have hd₀ (u v : V) (i : Fin 4) := hd u v i v (var 0) (by simp)
simp only [hd₁,hd₀,ordinal_injective.eq_iff,hc.eq_iff]
constructor
· intro h u v huv
exact h u v (fun i => congrFun huv i)
· intro h u v huv
apply h
exact funext huv
end QuotedFormula
end
end WitnessedChoice.BGS
namespace WitnessedSeparation.Grid
noncomputable section
open Classical WitnessedChoice WitnessedChoice.BGS Hereditary
variable {n : ℕ} {b : Vertex n → Scalar}
lemma configuration_exists (hn : 1 ≤ n) (v : Vertex n) : Nonempty (Configuration b v) := by
obtain ⟨e0,_⟩ := incident_on_axis hn v 0
exact ⟨{ state := fun e => ⟨0,extendVertexScalars b v e0 0 e⟩
compatible := by intro e e' f hf hf'; rfl
charge := extendVertexScalars_charge e0 0 }⟩
@[simp] lemma mem_edgeBlockSet (e : Edge n) (a : Atom b) :
a ∈ edgeBlockSet b e ↔ ∃ s : LocalGroup e, a = .inl ⟨e,s⟩ := by
simp only [edgeBlockSet,Finset.mem_image,Finset.mem_univ,true_and]
aesop
@[simp] lemma mem_vertexBlockSet (v : Vertex n) (a : Atom b) :
a ∈ vertexBlockSet b v ↔ ∃ s : Configuration b v, a = .inr ⟨v,s⟩ := by
simp only [vertexBlockSet,Finset.mem_image,Finset.mem_univ,true_and]
aesop
lemma edgeBlockSet_injective : Function.Injective (edgeBlockSet b) := by
intro e f h
have hm : (Sum.inl ⟨e,1⟩ : Atom b) ∈ edgeBlockSet b e := by simp
rw [h,mem_edgeBlockSet] at hm
obtain ⟨t,ht⟩ := hm
exact congrArg Sigma.fst (Sum.inl.inj ht)
lemma vertexBlockSet_injective (hn : 1 ≤ n) : Function.Injective (vertexBlockSet b) := by
intro v w h
obtain ⟨s⟩ := configuration_exists (b := b) hn v
have hm : (Sum.inr ⟨v,s⟩ : Atom b) ∈ vertexBlockSet b v := by simp
rw [h,mem_vertexBlockSet] at hm
obtain ⟨t,ht⟩ := hm
exact congrArg Sigma.fst (Sum.inr.inj ht)
lemma edgeRow_grid (e : Edge n) (s : LocalGroup e) :
WitnessedChoice.edgeRow (atomInput b) (.inl ⟨e,s⟩) = edgeBlockSet b e := by
ext a
simp only [WitnessedChoice.edgeRow,WitnessedChoice.edgeAtoms,Finset.mem_filter,
Finset.mem_univ,true_and,atomInput,decide_eq_true_eq,mem_edgeBlockSet]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_,h⟩
cases h with | eb e s t => exact ⟨t,rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨t,rfl⟩
exact ⟨.ed e t,.eb e s t⟩
lemma vertexRow_grid (v : Vertex n) (s : Configuration b v) :
WitnessedChoice.vertexRow (atomInput b) (.inr ⟨v,s⟩) = vertexBlockSet b v := by
ext a
simp only [WitnessedChoice.vertexRow,WitnessedChoice.configAtoms,Finset.mem_filter,
Finset.mem_univ,true_and,atomInput,decide_eq_true_eq,mem_vertexBlockSet]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_,h⟩
cases h with | vb v s t => exact ⟨t,rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨t,rfl⟩
exact ⟨.cf v t,.vb v s t⟩
lemma edgeBlocks_grid : WitnessedChoice.edgeBlocks (atomInput b) =
Finset.univ.image (edgeBlockSet b) := by
ext d
simp only [WitnessedChoice.edgeBlocks,Finset.mem_image,WitnessedChoice.edgeAtoms,
Finset.mem_filter,Finset.mem_univ,true_and,atomInput,decide_eq_true_eq]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a,h,rfl⟩
cases h with | ed e s => exact ⟨e,(edgeRow_grid e s).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨e,rfl⟩
exact ⟨.inl ⟨e,1⟩,.ed e 1,edgeRow_grid e 1⟩
lemma vertexBlocks_grid (hn : 1 ≤ n) : WitnessedChoice.vertexBlocks (atomInput b) =
Finset.univ.image (vertexBlockSet b) := by
ext d
simp only [WitnessedChoice.vertexBlocks,Finset.mem_image,WitnessedChoice.configAtoms,
Finset.mem_filter,Finset.mem_univ,true_and,atomInput,decide_eq_true_eq]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a,h,rfl⟩
cases h with | cf v s => exact ⟨v,(vertexRow_grid v s).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨v,rfl⟩
obtain ⟨s⟩ := configuration_exists (b := b) hn v
exact ⟨.inr ⟨v,s⟩,.cf v s,vertexRow_grid v s⟩
def vertexCode (b : Vertex n → Scalar) (v : Vertex n) : HF (Atom b) := stateCode (vertexBlockSet b v)
def edgeCode (b : Vertex n → Scalar) (e : Edge n) : HF (Atom b) := stateCode (edgeBlockSet b e)
lemma vertexCode_injective (hn : 1 ≤ n) : Function.Injective (vertexCode b) :=
fun _ _ h => vertexBlockSet_injective hn (stateCode_inj.mp h)
lemma edgeCode_injective : Function.Injective (edgeCode b) :=
fun _ _ h => edgeBlockSet_injective (stateCode_inj.mp h)
lemma blockIncident_grid (hn : 1 ≤ n) (v : Vertex n) (e : Edge n) :
blockIncident (atomInput b) (vertexCode b v) (edgeCode b e) ↔ incident v e := by
simp only [blockIncident,vertexCode,edgeCode,exists_stateCode,mem_vertexBlockSet,
mem_edgeBlockSet]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_,⟨s,rfl⟩,_,⟨t,rfl⟩,h⟩
rw [inputHF_atoms] at h
change decide (AtomRelation b .I (.inr ⟨v,s⟩) (.inl ⟨e,t⟩)) = true at h
have h := of_decide_eq_true h
cases h with | inc v s e => exact e.property
· intro h
obtain ⟨s⟩ := configuration_exists (b := b) hn v
exact ⟨.inr ⟨v,s⟩,⟨s,rfl⟩,.inl ⟨e,s.state ⟨e,h⟩⟩,⟨_,rfl⟩,
by rw [inputHF_atoms]; exact decide_eq_true (.inc v s ⟨e,h⟩)⟩
end
noncomputable section
open Classical WitnessedChoice WitnessedChoice.BGS Hereditary
variable {n : ℕ} {b : Vertex n → Scalar}
def edgeGraph (T : Finset (Edge n)) : SimpleGraph (Vertex n) where
Adj u v := ∃ e ∈ T, (u = tail e ∧ v = head e) ∨ (v = tail e ∧ u = head e)
symm := ⟨by intro u v; rintro ⟨e,he,h⟩; exact ⟨e,he,h.symm⟩⟩
loopless := ⟨by
intro v
rintro ⟨e,he,h|h⟩
all_goals exact head_ne_tail e (h.2.symm.trans h.1)⟩
lemma edgeGraph_univ : edgeGraph (Finset.univ : Finset (Edge n)) = boxGraph n := by
ext u v
simp only [edgeGraph,Finset.mem_univ,true_and,boxGraph_adj_iff]
lemma blockAdjacent_edges (hn : 1 ≤ n) (T : Finset (Edge n)) (u v : Vertex n) :
blockAdjacent (atomInput b) (ofFinset (T.image (edgeCode b))) (vertexCode b u) (vertexCode b v) ↔
(edgeGraph T).Adj u v := by
simp only [blockAdjacent,(vertexCode_injective hn).ne_iff,elements_ofFinset,
Finset.mem_image,exists_exists_and_eq_and,blockIncident_grid hn,edgeGraph]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hne,e,he,hu,hv⟩
refine ⟨e,he,?_⟩
rcases hu with hu | hu <;> rcases hv with hv | hv
· exact (hne (hu.symm.trans hv)).elim
· exact Or.inr ⟨hv.symm,hu.symm⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨hu.symm,hv.symm⟩
· exact (hne (hu.symm.trans hv)).elim
· rintro ⟨e,he,(⟨rfl,rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl,rfl⟩)⟩
· exact ⟨(head_ne_tail e).symm,e,he,Or.inr rfl,Or.inl rfl⟩
· exact ⟨head_ne_tail e,e,he,Or.inl rfl,Or.inr rfl⟩
lemma vertex_card_le_atoms (hn : 1 ≤ n) : Fintype.card (Vertex n) ≤ Fintype.card (Atom b) := by
let f (v : Vertex n) : Atom b := .inr ⟨v,(configuration_exists (b := b) hn v).some⟩
apply Fintype.card_le_of_injective f
intro v w h
exact congrArg Sigma.fst (Sum.inr.inj h)
lemma quoted_vertexBlocks {k : ℕ} (hn : 1 ≤ n) (env : Fin k → HF (Atom b)) :
(QuotedTerm.vertexBlocks : QuotedTerm k).meaning (atomInput b) env =
ofFinset (Finset.univ.image (vertexCode b)) := by
rw [QuotedTerm.meaning_vertexBlocks,vertexBlocks_grid hn,Finset.image_image]
rfl
lemma quoted_edgeBlocks {k : ℕ} (env : Fin k → HF (Atom b)) :
(QuotedTerm.edgeBlocks : QuotedTerm k).meaning (atomInput b) env =
ofFinset (Finset.univ.image (edgeCode b)) := by
rw [QuotedTerm.meaning_edgeBlocks,edgeBlocks_grid,Finset.image_image]
rfl
end
noncomputable section
open Classical
variable {n : ℕ}
lemma xy_incident_face (i : Fin n) (j k : Fin (n+1)) (i' k' : Fin (n+1)) (j' : Fin n) (v : Vertex n)
(hv : incident v (ex i j k)) (hw : incident v (ey i' j' k')) :
∃ f : Face n, cycle f (ex i j k) ≠ 0 ∧ cycle f (ey i' j' k') ≠ 0 := by
rcases hv with hv|hv
all_goals subst v
all_goals rcases hw with hw|hw
all_goals simp only [head,tail] at hw
all_goals rcases hw with ⟨hi,hj,hk⟩
all_goals refine ⟨.inl (i,j',k),?_,?_⟩
all_goals solve
| (convert cycle_faceSide (n := n) (.inl (i,j',k)) 0 using 1 ; simp_all [faceSide])
| (convert cycle_faceSide (n := n) (.inl (i,j',k)) 1 using 1 ; simp_all [faceSide])
| (convert cycle_faceSide (n := n) (.inl (i,j',k)) 2 using 1 ; simp_all [faceSide])
| (convert cycle_faceSide (n := n) (.inl (i,j',k)) 3 using 1 ; simp_all [faceSide])
lemma xz_incident_face (i : Fin n) (j k : Fin (n+1)) (i' j' : Fin (n+1)) (k' : Fin n) (v : Vertex n)
(hv : incident v (ex i j k)) (hw : incident v (ez i' j' k')) :
∃ f : Face n, cycle f (ex i j k) ≠ 0 ∧ cycle f (ez i' j' k') ≠ 0 := by
rcases hv with hv|hv
all_goals subst v
all_goals rcases hw with hw|hw
all_goals simp only [head,tail] at hw
all_goals rcases hw with ⟨hi,hj,hk⟩
all_goals refine ⟨.inr (.inl (i,j,k')),?_,?_⟩
all_goals solve
| (convert cycle_faceSide (n := n) (.inr (.inl (i,j,k'))) 0 using 1 ; simp_all [faceSide])
| (convert cycle_faceSide (n := n) (.inr (.inl (i,j,k'))) 1 using 1 ; simp_all [faceSide])
| (convert cycle_faceSide (n := n) (.inr (.inl (i,j,k'))) 2 using 1 ; simp_all [faceSide])
| (convert cycle_faceSide (n := n) (.inr (.inl (i,j,k'))) 3 using 1 ; simp_all [faceSide])
lemma yz_incident_face (j : Fin n) (i k : Fin (n+1)) (i' j' : Fin (n+1)) (k' : Fin n) (v : Vertex n)
(hv : incident v (ey i j k)) (hw : incident v (ez i' j' k')) :
∃ f : Face n, cycle f (ey i j k) ≠ 0 ∧ cycle f (ez i' j' k') ≠ 0 := by
rcases hv with hv|hv
all_goals subst v
all_goals rcases hw with hw|hw
all_goals simp only [head,tail] at hw
all_goals rcases hw with ⟨hi,hj,hk⟩
all_goals refine ⟨.inr (.inr (i,j,k')),?_,?_⟩
all_goals solve
| (convert cycle_faceSide (n := n) (.inr (.inr (i,j,k'))) 0 using 1 ; simp_all [faceSide])
| (convert cycle_faceSide (n := n) (.inr (.inr (i,j,k'))) 1 using 1 ; simp_all [faceSide])
| (convert cycle_faceSide (n := n) (.inr (.inr (i,j,k'))) 2 using 1 ; simp_all [faceSide])
| (convert cycle_faceSide (n := n) (.inr (.inr (i,j,k'))) 3 using 1 ; simp_all [faceSide])
lemma incident_perpendicular_face (v : Vertex n) (e e' : Edge n)
(hv : incident v e) (hw : incident v e') (ha : edgeAxis e ≠ edgeAxis e') :
∃ f : Face n, cycle f e ≠ 0 ∧ cycle f e' ≠ 0 := by
have swap : (∃ f : Face n, cycle f e' ≠ 0 ∧ cycle f e ≠ 0) →
∃ f : Face n, cycle f e ≠ 0 ∧ cycle f e' ≠ 0 := by
rintro ⟨f,hf,hf'⟩; exact ⟨f,hf',hf⟩
rcases e with ⟨i,j,k⟩ | (⟨i,j,k⟩ | ⟨i,j,k⟩)
all_goals rcases e' with ⟨i',j',k'⟩ | (⟨i',j',k'⟩ | ⟨i',j',k'⟩)
all_goals first
| exact (ha rfl).elim
| exact xy_incident_face _ _ _ _ _ _ v hv hw
| exact xz_incident_face _ _ _ _ _ _ v hv hw
| exact yz_incident_face _ _ _ _ _ _ v hv hw
| exact swap (xy_incident_face _ _ _ _ _ _ v hw hv)
| exact swap (xz_incident_face _ _ _ _ _ _ v hw hv)
| exact swap (yz_incident_face _ _ _ _ _ _ v hw hv)
end
noncomputable section
open Classical SimpleGraph
variable {n : ℕ}
lemma square_common_neighbors (f : Face n) (i : Fin 4) (v : Vertex n)
(h₀ : (boxGraph n).Adj (faceCorner f i) v)
(h₂ : (boxGraph n).Adj (faceCorner f (i+2)) v) :
v = faceCorner f (i+1) ∨ v = faceCorner f (i+3) := by
rcases f with ⟨x,y,z⟩ | (⟨x,y,z⟩ | ⟨x,y,z⟩) <;> fin_cases i
all_goals
simp [boxGraph,boxProd_adj,pathGraph_adj,faceCorner,Prod.ext_iff,Fin.ext_iff] at h₀ h₂ ⊢
omega
end
noncomputable section
open Classical
abbrev Direction := Fin 3 × Bool
def directionVector (d : Direction) : Fin 3 → ℤ :=
fun a => if a = d.1 then (if d.2 then 1 else -1) else 0
def oppositeDirection (d : Direction) : Direction := (d.1,!d.2)
lemma direction_neg (d : Direction) : directionVector (oppositeDirection d) = -directionVector d := by
rcases d with ⟨a,b⟩
funext i
cases b <;> by_cases h : i = a <;> simp [directionVector,oppositeDirection,h]
lemma four_direction_pattern : ∀ d₀ d₁ d₂ d₃ : Direction,
directionVector d₀ + directionVector d₁ + directionVector d₂ + directionVector d₃ = 0 →
directionVector d₀ + directionVector d₁ ≠ 0 →
directionVector d₁ + directionVector d₂ ≠ 0 →
d₂ = oppositeDirection d₀ ∧ d₃ = oppositeDirection d₁ ∧ d₀.1 ≠ d₁.1 := by
decide
end
noncomputable section
open Classical SimpleGraph
variable {n : ℕ}
def vertexInt (v : Vertex n) : Fin 3 → ℤ := fun a => (vertexCoord v a).val
lemma vertexInt_injective : Function.Injective (vertexInt (n := n)) := by
intro v w h
apply vertexCoord_injective
funext a
apply Fin.ext
exact Int.ofNat_inj.mp (congrFun h a)
lemma head_vertexInt (e : Edge n) :
vertexInt (head e) = vertexInt (tail e) + directionVector (edgeAxis e,true) := by
rcases e with ⟨x,y,z⟩ | (⟨x,y,z⟩ | ⟨x,y,z⟩)
all_goals
funext a
fin_cases a <;> simp [vertexInt,vertexCoord,head,tail,directionVector,edgeAxis]
lemma endpoints_direction (u v : Vertex n) (e : Edge n)
(h : (u = tail e ∧ v = head e) ∨ (v = tail e ∧ u = head e)) :
∃ d : Direction, d.1 = edgeAxis e ∧ vertexInt v - vertexInt u = directionVector d := by
rcases h with ⟨rfl,rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl,rfl⟩
· exact ⟨(edgeAxis e,true),rfl,by rw [head_vertexInt]; abel⟩
· refine ⟨(edgeAxis e,false),rfl,?_⟩
have ht : directionVector (edgeAxis e,false) = -directionVector (edgeAxis e,true) :=
direction_neg (edgeAxis e,true)
rw [head_vertexInt,ht]
abel
lemma square_consecutive_perpendicular (v : Fin 4 → Vertex n) (e : Fin 4 → Edge n)
(hv : Function.Injective v)
(he : ∀ i, (v i = tail (e i) ∧ v (i+1) = head (e i)) ∨
(v (i+1) = tail (e i) ∧ v i = head (e i))) :
edgeAxis (e 0) ≠ edgeAxis (e 1) := by
choose d hd hvec using fun i => endpoints_direction (v i) (v (i+1)) (e i) (he i)
have hzero : directionVector (d 0) + directionVector (d 1) +
directionVector (d 2) + directionVector (d 3) = 0 := by
rw [← hvec 0,← hvec 1,← hvec 2,← hvec 3]
change (vertexInt (v 1) - vertexInt (v 0)) + (vertexInt (v 2) - vertexInt (v 1)) +
(vertexInt (v 3) - vertexInt (v 2)) + (vertexInt (v 0) - vertexInt (v 3)) = 0
abel
have hz₁ : directionVector (d 0) + directionVector (d 1) ≠ 0 := by
intro h
have hh : vertexInt (v 2) = vertexInt (v 0) := by
have h' : vertexInt (v 2) - vertexInt (v 0) = 0 := by
calc
_ = directionVector (d 0) + directionVector (d 1) := by
rw [← hvec 0,← hvec 1]
change vertexInt (v 2) - vertexInt (v 0) =
(vertexInt (v 1) - vertexInt (v 0)) + (vertexInt (v 2) - vertexInt (v 1))
abel
_ = 0 := h
exact sub_eq_zero.mp h'
exact (by decide : (2 : Fin 4) ≠ 0) (hv (vertexInt_injective hh))
have hz₂ : directionVector (d 1) + directionVector (d 2) ≠ 0 := by
intro h
have hh : vertexInt (v 3) = vertexInt (v 1) := by
have h' : vertexInt (v 3) - vertexInt (v 1) = 0 := by
calc
_ = directionVector (d 1) + directionVector (d 2) := by
rw [← hvec 1,← hvec 2]
change vertexInt (v 3) - vertexInt (v 1) =
(vertexInt (v 2) - vertexInt (v 1)) + (vertexInt (v 3) - vertexInt (v 2))
abel
_ = 0 := h
exact sub_eq_zero.mp h'
exact (by decide : (3 : Fin 4) ≠ 1) (hv (vertexInt_injective hh))
simpa only [hd] using (four_direction_pattern _ _ _ _ hzero hz₁ hz₂).2.2
lemma faceCorner_index_injective (f : Face n) : Function.Injective (faceCorner f) := by
intro i j
rcases f with ⟨x,y,z⟩ | (⟨x,y,z⟩ | ⟨x,y,z⟩) <;> fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j
all_goals simp [faceCorner,castSucc_ne_succ_self,succ_ne_castSucc_self]
lemma incident_faceSide (f : Face n) (i : Fin 4) (v : Vertex n) :
incident v (faceSide f i) ↔ v = faceCorner f i ∨ v = faceCorner f (i+1) := by
rcases f with ⟨x,y,z⟩ | (⟨x,y,z⟩ | ⟨x,y,z⟩) <;> fin_cases i
all_goals simp [incident,faceSide,faceCorner,tail,head,ex,ey,ez,or_comm,eq_comm]
lemma square_index_calculation : ∀ i j a b c : Fin 4, i ≠ j →
(a=i ∨ a=i+1) → (b=i ∨ b=i+1) → (b=j ∨ b=j+1) → (c=j ∨ c=j+1) →
a ≠ b → b ≠ c → c = a+2 := by decide
lemma face_chain_opposite (f : Face n) (i j : Fin 4) (v₀ v₁ v₂ : Vertex n)
(hij : i ≠ j) (h01 : v₀ ≠ v₁) (h12 : v₁ ≠ v₂)
(hi₀ : incident v₀ (faceSide f i)) (hi₁ : incident v₁ (faceSide f i))
(hj₁ : incident v₁ (faceSide f j)) (hj₂ : incident v₂ (faceSide f j)) :
∃ k : Fin 4, v₀ = faceCorner f k ∧ v₂ = faceCorner f (k+2) := by
have h0 : ∃ a, v₀ = faceCorner f a := by
rcases (incident_faceSide f i v₀).mp hi₀ with h|h <;> exact ⟨_,h⟩
have h1 : ∃ a, v₁ = faceCorner f a := by
rcases (incident_faceSide f i v₁).mp hi₁ with h|h <;> exact ⟨_,h⟩
have h2 : ∃ a, v₂ = faceCorner f a := by
rcases (incident_faceSide f j v₂).mp hj₂ with h|h <;> exact ⟨_,h⟩
obtain ⟨a,rfl⟩ := h0
obtain ⟨b,rfl⟩ := h1
obtain ⟨c,rfl⟩ := h2
have hc : c = a+2 := square_index_calculation i j a b c hij
(by simpa only [incident_faceSide,(faceCorner_index_injective f).eq_iff] using hi₀)
(by simpa only [incident_faceSide,(faceCorner_index_injective f).eq_iff] using hi₁)
(by simpa only [incident_faceSide,(faceCorner_index_injective f).eq_iff] using hj₁)
(by simpa only [incident_faceSide,(faceCorner_index_injective f).eq_iff] using hj₂)
(fun h => h01 (congrArg _ h)) (fun h => h12 (congrArg _ h))
exact ⟨a,rfl,congrArg _ hc⟩
lemma edge_eq_of_endpoints (e f : Edge n)
(h : (tail e=tail f ∧ head e=head f) ∨ (tail e=head f ∧ head e=tail f)) : e=f := by
rcases e with ⟨x,y,z⟩ | (⟨x,y,z⟩ | ⟨x,y,z⟩)
all_goals rcases f with ⟨x',y',z'⟩ | (⟨x',y',z'⟩ | ⟨x',y',z'⟩)
all_goals simp [tail,head,Prod.ext_iff,Fin.ext_iff] at h ⊢
all_goals omega
end
noncomputable section
open Classical WitnessedChoice WitnessedChoice.TreeTest
variable {n : ℕ}
def symEdge (e : Edge n) : Sym2 (Vertex n) := s(tail e, head e)
lemma symEdge_injective : Function.Injective (symEdge (n := n)) := by
intro e f h
apply edge_eq_of_endpoints e f
exact Sym2.eq_iff.mp h
lemma edgeGraph_edgeFinset (T : Finset (Edge n)) :
(edgeGraph T).edgeFinset = T.image symEdge := by
apply Finset.ext
intro q
induction q using Sym2.inductionOn with
| _ u v =>
rw [SimpleGraph.mem_edgeFinset,SimpleGraph.mem_edgeSet]
change (∃ e ∈ T, u = tail e ∧ v = head e ∨ v = tail e ∧ u = head e) ↔ _
simp only [Finset.mem_image,symEdge,Sym2.eq_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨e,he, (⟨hu,hv⟩ | ⟨hv,hu⟩)⟩
· exact ⟨e,he,Or.inl ⟨hu.symm,hv.symm⟩⟩
· exact ⟨e,he,Or.inr ⟨hv.symm,hu.symm⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨e,he, (⟨hu,hv⟩ | ⟨hv,hu⟩)⟩
· exact ⟨e,he,Or.inl ⟨hu.symm,hv.symm⟩⟩
· exact ⟨e,he,Or.inr ⟨hv.symm,hu.symm⟩⟩
lemma edgeGraph_card (T : Finset (Edge n)) :
Nat.card (edgeGraph T).edgeSet = T.card := by
rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card,←SimpleGraph.edgeFinset_card,edgeGraph_edgeFinset,
Finset.card_image_of_injective _ symEdge_injective]
namespace ParentEdges
variable {T : RootedTree (Vertex n)} (P : ParentEdges T)
lemma edge_injective : Function.Injective (fun v : {v : Vertex n // v ≠ T.root} => P.edge v.val v.property) := by
intro v w h
apply Subtype.ext
have hv := P.endpoints v.val v.property
have hw := P.endpoints w.val w.property
change P.edge v.val v.property = P.edge w.val w.property at h
rw [h] at hv
rcases hv with ⟨hv₁,hv₂⟩ | ⟨hv₁,hv₂⟩ <;>
rcases hw with ⟨hw₁,hw₂⟩ | ⟨hw₁,hw₂⟩
· exact hv₁.symm.trans hw₁
· have he₁ := hv₁.symm.trans hw₂
have he₂ := hw₁.symm.trans hv₂
have hlv := T.parent_lower v.val v.property
have hlw := T.parent_lower w.val w.property
rw [←he₁] at hlw
rw [←he₂] at hlv
omega
· have he₁ := hv₁.symm.trans hw₂
have he₂ := hw₁.symm.trans hv₂
have hlv := T.parent_lower v.val v.property
have hlw := T.parent_lower w.val w.property
rw [←he₁] at hlw
rw [←he₂] at hlv
omega
· exact hv₁.symm.trans hw₁
lemma graph_adj (u v : Vertex n) : (edgeGraph P.treeEdges).Adj u v ↔ T.Adj u v := by
simp only [edgeGraph,treeEdges,Finset.mem_image,Finset.mem_univ,true_and,exists_exists_eq_and]
constructor
· rintro ⟨w,h⟩
rcases P.endpoints w.val w.property with ⟨hh,ht⟩ | ⟨ht,hh⟩
· rw [hh,ht] at h
rcases h with ⟨rfl,rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl,rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨w.property,rfl⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨w.property,rfl⟩
· rw [hh,ht] at h
rcases h with ⟨rfl,rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl,rfl⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨w.property,rfl⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨w.property,rfl⟩
· rintro (⟨hu,rfl⟩ | ⟨hv,rfl⟩)
· refine ⟨⟨u,hu⟩,?_⟩
rcases P.endpoints u hu with ⟨hh,ht⟩ | ⟨ht,hh⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨ht.symm,hh.symm⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨ht.symm,hh.symm⟩
· refine ⟨⟨v,hv⟩,?_⟩
rcases P.endpoints v hv with ⟨hh,ht⟩ | ⟨ht,hh⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨ht.symm,hh.symm⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨ht.symm,hh.symm⟩
lemma graph_reachable_root (v : Vertex n) : (edgeGraph P.treeEdges).Reachable v T.root := by
induction v using (measure T.level).wf.induction with
| h v ih =>
by_cases hv : v = T.root
· subst v; exact .rfl
· exact ((P.graph_adj v (T.parent v)).mpr (T.parent_adj v hv)).reachable.trans
(ih (T.parent v) (T.parent_lower v hv))
lemma graph_connected : (edgeGraph P.treeEdges).Connected where
preconnected u v := (P.graph_reachable_root u).trans (P.graph_reachable_root v).symm
nonempty := ⟨T.root⟩
lemma card_treeEdges : P.treeEdges.card + 1 = Fintype.card (Vertex n) := by
simp only [treeEdges,Finset.card_image_of_injective _ P.edge_injective,Finset.card_univ]
have h := Fintype.card_subtype_compl (fun v : Vertex n => v = T.root)
have hc : Fintype.card {v : Vertex n // v = T.root} = 1 := by simp
rw [hc] at h
change Fintype.card {v : Vertex n // v ≠ T.root} = _ at h
have hp : 0 < Fintype.card (Vertex n) := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr ⟨T.root⟩
omega
lemma graph_isTree : (edgeGraph P.treeEdges).IsTree := by
rw [SimpleGraph.isTree_iff_connected_and_card]
exact ⟨P.graph_connected,by rw [edgeGraph_card,Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]; exact P.card_treeEdges⟩
end ParentEdges
end
end WitnessedSeparation.Grid
section
namespace WitnessedChoice.BGS
noncomputable section
open Classical WitnessedSeparation WitnessedSeparation.Hereditary QuotedTerm
namespace QuotedFormula
variable {A V : Type} [Fintype A] [Fintype V] {k : ℕ}
lemma meaning_leastVertex (S : Input A) (env : Fin k → HF A)
(ats VT R vt : QuotedTerm k) (code : V → HF A) (hc : Function.Injective code)
(G : SimpleGraph V) (hG : G.Connected) (α : Fin 4 → V) (v : V)
(hα : ats.meaning S env = tupleCode (List.ofFn (code ∘ α)))
(hV : VT.meaning S env = ofFinset (Finset.univ.image code))
(hR : R.meaning S env = ofFinset ((BFS.closure G (Fintype.card A)).image (distanceCode code)))
(hv : vt.meaning S env = code v) (hcard : Fintype.card V ≤ Fintype.card A) :
(leastVertex ats VT R vt).meaning S env ↔ v = α 0 := by
simp only [leastVertex,meaning_and,meaning_mem,hv,hV,elements_ofFinset,
Finset.mem_image,Finset.mem_univ,true_and,hc.eq_iff,exists_eq,true_and,
meaning_allIn,forall_exists_index,forall_apply_eq_imp_iff,meaning_neg]
have hm (w : V) : (vertexLt ats.up R.up (var 0) vt.up).meaning S (Fin.cons (code w) env) ↔
AnchoredTree.key G α w < AnchoredTree.key G α v := by
apply meaning_vertexLt S _ _ _ _ _ code hc G hG α w v
all_goals first | assumption | rfl
simpa only [hm] using AnchoredTree.least_iff_root G hG α v
end QuotedFormula
namespace QuotedTerm
variable {A V : Type} [Fintype A] [Fintype V] {k : ℕ}
lemma meaning_root (S : Input A) (env : Fin k → HF A)
(ats VT R : QuotedTerm k) (code : V → HF A) (hc : Function.Injective code)
(G : SimpleGraph V) (hG : G.Connected) (α : Fin 4 → V)
(hα : ats.meaning S env = tupleCode (List.ofFn (code ∘ α)))
(hV : VT.meaning S env = ofFinset (Finset.univ.image code))
(hR : R.meaning S env = ofFinset ((BFS.closure G (Fintype.card A)).image (distanceCode code)))
(hcard : Fintype.card V ≤ Fintype.card A) :
(root ats VT R).meaning S env = code (α 0) := by
have hm (v : V) : (QuotedFormula.leastVertex ats.up VT.up R.up (var 0)).meaning S
(Fin.cons (code v) env) ↔ v = α 0 := by
apply QuotedFormula.meaning_leastVertex S _ _ _ _ _ code hc G hG α v
all_goals first | assumption | rfl
simp only [root,meaning_unique,meaning_filter,hV,elements_ofFinset]
have hf : (Finset.univ.image code).filter (fun z =>
(QuotedFormula.leastVertex ats.up VT.up R.up (var 0)).meaning S (Fin.cons z env)) =
{code (α 0)} := by
ext z
simp only [Finset.mem_filter,Finset.mem_image,Finset.mem_univ,true_and,Finset.mem_singleton]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨v,rfl⟩,hv⟩
rw [hm] at hv
rw [hv]
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨⟨α 0,rfl⟩,(hm _).mpr rfl⟩
rw [hf]
exact uniqueHF_singleton _
end QuotedTerm
end
end WitnessedChoice.BGS
namespace WitnessedSeparation.Grid
noncomputable section
open Classical WitnessedChoice WitnessedChoice.BGS Hereditary
variable {n : ℕ} {b : Vertex n → Scalar}
def anchoredTree (α : Fin 4 → Vertex n) : TreeTest.RootedTree (Vertex n) :=
AnchoredTree.rooted (boxGraph n) (boxGraph_connected n) α
def anchoredParents (α : Fin 4 → Vertex n) : ParentEdges (anchoredTree α) where
edge v hv := ((boxGraph_adj_iff v ((anchoredTree α).parent v)).mp
(AnchoredTree.parent_property (boxGraph n) (boxGraph_connected n) α v hv).1.1).choose
endpoints v hv := by
have h := ((boxGraph_adj_iff v ((anchoredTree α).parent v)).mp
(AnchoredTree.parent_property (boxGraph n) (boxGraph_connected n) α v hv).1.1).choose_spec
rcases h with ⟨h,h'⟩ | ⟨h',h⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨h.symm,h'.symm⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨h.symm,h'.symm⟩
namespace QuotedGrid
open QuotedTerm QuotedFormula
variable {k : ℕ}
lemma meaning_incident (env : Fin k → HF (Atom b)) (vt et : QuotedTerm k)
(u : Vertex n) (e : Edge n) (hu : vt.meaning (atomInput b) env = vertexCode b u)
(he : et.meaning (atomInput b) env = edgeCode b e) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
(QuotedFormula.incident vt et).meaning (atomInput b) env ↔ incident u e := by
rw [QuotedFormula.meaning_incident,hu,he]
exact blockIncident_grid hn u e
lemma meaning_adjacent (env : Fin k → HF (Atom b)) (Et ut vt : QuotedTerm k)
(D : Finset (Edge n)) (u v : Vertex n)
(hE : Et.meaning (atomInput b) env = ofFinset (D.image (edgeCode b)))
(hu : ut.meaning (atomInput b) env = vertexCode b u)
(hv : vt.meaning (atomInput b) env = vertexCode b v) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
(adjacent Et ut vt).meaning (atomInput b) env ↔ (edgeGraph D).Adj u v := by
rw [QuotedFormula.meaning_adjacent,hE,hu,hv]
exact blockAdjacent_edges hn D u v
lemma meaning_parentEligible (env : Fin k → HF (Atom b)) (Et R rt vt wt : QuotedTerm k)
(r v w : Vertex n)
(hE : Et.meaning (atomInput b) env = ofFinset (Finset.univ.image (edgeCode b)))
(hR : R.meaning (atomInput b) env = ofFinset
((BFS.closure (boxGraph n) (Fintype.card (Atom b))).image (distanceCode (vertexCode b))))
(hr : rt.meaning (atomInput b) env = vertexCode b r)
(hv : vt.meaning (atomInput b) env = vertexCode b v)
(hw : wt.meaning (atomInput b) env = vertexCode b w) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
(parentEligible Et R rt vt wt).meaning (atomInput b) env ↔ AnchoredTree.Eligible (boxGraph n) r v w := by
have hd (u : Vertex n) (ut : QuotedTerm k) (hu : ut.meaning (atomInput b) env = vertexCode b u) :=
QuotedTerm.meaning_distanceAt (atomInput b) env R rt ut (vertexCode b) (vertexCode_injective hn)
(boxGraph n) (boxGraph_connected n) r u hR hr hu (vertex_card_le_atoms hn)
rw [parentEligible,meaning_and,meaning_adjacent env Et vt wt _ v w hE hv hw hn,edgeGraph_univ]
simp only [meaning_eq,meaning_successor,hd w wt hw,hd v vt hv]
change ((boxGraph n).Adj v w ∧ ordinal ((boxGraph n).dist r w + 1) = ordinal ((boxGraph n).dist r v)) ↔ _
rw [ordinal_injective.eq_iff]
rfl
lemma meaning_parent (env : Fin k → HF (Atom b)) (ats VT Et R rt vt wt : QuotedTerm k)
(α : Fin 4 → Vertex n) (v w : Vertex n) (hres : AnchoredTree.Resolving (boxGraph n) α)
(hα : ats.meaning (atomInput b) env = tupleCode (List.ofFn (vertexCode b ∘ α)))
(hV : VT.meaning (atomInput b) env = ofFinset (Finset.univ.image (vertexCode b)))
(hE : Et.meaning (atomInput b) env = ofFinset (Finset.univ.image (edgeCode b)))
(hR : R.meaning (atomInput b) env = ofFinset
((BFS.closure (boxGraph n) (Fintype.card (Atom b))).image (distanceCode (vertexCode b))))
(hr : rt.meaning (atomInput b) env = vertexCode b (α 0))
(hv : vt.meaning (atomInput b) env = vertexCode b v)
(hw : wt.meaning (atomInput b) env = vertexCode b w) (hn : 1 ≤ n) :
(QuotedFormula.parent ats VT Et R rt vt wt).meaning (atomInput b) env ↔
v ≠ α 0 ∧ (anchoredTree α).parent v = w := by
have hel (z : Vertex n) : (parentEligible Et.up R.up rt.up vt.up (var 0)).meaning
(atomInput b) (Fin.cons (vertexCode b z) env) ↔ AnchoredTree.Eligible (boxGraph n) (α 0) v z := by
apply meaning_parentEligible _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hn
all_goals first | assumption | exact vertex_card_le_atoms hn | rfl
have hlt (z : Vertex n) : (vertexLt ats.up R.up (var 0) wt.up).meaning
(atomInput b) (Fin.cons (vertexCode b z) env) ↔
AnchoredTree.key (boxGraph n) α z < AnchoredTree.key (boxGraph n) α w := by
apply QuotedFormula.meaning_vertexLt _ _ _ _ _ _ (vertexCode b) (vertexCode_injective hn)
(boxGraph n) (boxGraph_connected n) α z w
all_goals first | assumption | exact vertex_card_le_atoms hn | rfl
simp only [QuotedFormula.parent,meaning_and,meaning_parentEligible env Et R rt vt wt _ _ _ hE hR hr hv hw hn,
meaning_allIn,hV,elements_ofFinset,Finset.mem_image,Finset.mem_univ,true_and,
forall_exists_index,forall_apply_eq_imp_iff,meaning_imp,meaning_neg,hel,hlt]
exact AnchoredTree.parent_iff (boxGraph n) (boxGraph_connected n) α hres v w
end QuotedGrid
end
end WitnessedSeparation.Grid
end
namespace WitnessedSeparation.Grid
noncomputable section
open Classical SimpleGraph
variable {n : ℕ}
lemma endpoints_iff_incident (u v : Vertex n) (e : Edge n) (hne : u ≠ v) :
((u = tail e ∧ v = head e) ∨ (v = tail e ∧ u = head e)) ↔
incident u e ∧ incident v e := by
simp only [incident]
constructor
· rintro (⟨hu,hv⟩|⟨hv,hu⟩)
· exact ⟨Or.inr hu.symm,Or.inl hv.symm⟩
· exact ⟨Or.inl hu.symm,Or.inr hv.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨(hu|hu),(hv|hv)⟩
· exact (hne (hu.symm.trans hv)).elim
· exact Or.inr ⟨hv.symm,hu.symm⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨hu.symm,hv.symm⟩
· exact (hne (hu.symm.trans hv)).elim
lemma edge_eq_of_common_incidents (u v : Vertex n) (e f : Edge n) (hne : u ≠ v)
(heu : incident u e) (hev : incident v e) (hfu : incident u f) (hfv : incident v f) : e=f := by
have he := (endpoints_iff_incident u v e hne).mpr ⟨heu,hev⟩
have hf := (endpoints_iff_incident u v f hne).mpr ⟨hfu,hfv⟩
apply edge_eq_of_endpoints
rcases he with ⟨he₁,he₂⟩|⟨he₂,he₁⟩
all_goals rcases hf with ⟨hf₁,hf₂⟩|⟨hf₂,hf₁⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨he₁.symm.trans hf₁,he₂.symm.trans hf₂⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨he₁.symm.trans hf₁,he₂.symm.trans hf₂⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨he₂.symm.trans hf₂,he₁.symm.trans hf₁⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨he₂.symm.trans hf₂,he₁.symm.trans hf₁⟩
lemma edge_on_face (f : Face n) (i j : Fin 4) (e : Edge n) (hij : AdjacentIndex i j)
(hi : incident (faceCorner f i) e) (hj : incident (faceCorner f j) e) : cycle f e ≠ 0 := by
rcases hij with rfl|rfl
· have hn : faceCorner f i ≠ faceCorner f (i+1) := by
intro h
have hh := faceCorner_index_injective f h
have hbad : ∀ i : Fin 4, i ≠ i+1 := by decide
exact hbad i hh
have he := edge_eq_of_common_incidents _ _ e (faceSide f i) hn hi hj
((incident_faceSide f i _).mpr (Or.inl rfl))
((incident_faceSide f i _).mpr (Or.inr rfl))
rw [he]
exact cycle_faceSide f i
· have hn : faceCorner f j ≠ faceCorner f (j+1) := by
intro h
have hh := faceCorner_index_injective f h
have hbad : ∀ i : Fin 4, i ≠ i+1 := by decide
exact hbad j hh
have he := edge_eq_of_common_incidents _ _ e (faceSide f j) hn hj hi
((incident_faceSide f j _).mpr (Or.inl rfl))
((incident_faceSide f j _).mpr (Or.inr rfl))
rw [he]
exact cycle_faceSide f j
lemma indexed_cycle_incident (v : Fin 4 → Vertex n) (e : Fin 4 → Edge n)
(he : ∀ i, (v i = tail (e i) ∧ v (i+1) = head (e i)) ∨
(v (i+1) = tail (e i) ∧ v i = head (e i))) (i : Fin 4) :
incident (v i) (e i) ∧ incident (v (i+1)) (e i) := by
rcases he i with ⟨h,h'⟩|⟨h',h⟩
· exact ⟨Or.inr h.symm,Or.inl h'.symm⟩
· exact ⟨Or.inl h.symm,Or.inr h'.symm⟩
theorem indexed_fourcycle_is_face (v : Fin 4 → Vertex n) (e : Fin 4 → Edge n)
(hv : Function.Injective v) (heinj : Function.Injective e)
(he : ∀ i, (v i = tail (e i) ∧ v (i+1) = head (e i)) ∨
(v (i+1) = tail (e i) ∧ v i = head (e i))) :
∃ f : Face n, ∀ i, cycle f (e i) ≠ 0 := by
have hi := indexed_cycle_incident v e he
obtain ⟨f,hf₀,hf₁⟩ := incident_perpendicular_face (v 1) (e 0) (e 1)
(hi 0).2 (hi 1).1 (square_consecutive_perpendicular v e hv he)
obtain ⟨i,hi₀⟩ := support_cycle f (e 0) hf₀
obtain ⟨j,hj₁⟩ := support_cycle f (e 1) hf₁
have hij : i ≠ j := by
intro h
have hh : e 0=e 1 := hi₀.symm.trans (h ▸ hj₁)
exact (by decide : (0 : Fin 4) ≠ 1) (heinj hh)
obtain ⟨k,h₀,h₂⟩ := face_chain_opposite f i j (v 0) (v 1) (v 2) hij
(fun h => (by decide : (0 : Fin 4) ≠ 1) (hv h))
(fun h => (by decide : (1 : Fin 4) ≠ 2) (hv h))
(hi₀ ▸ (hi 0).1) (hi₀ ▸ (hi 0).2) (hj₁ ▸ (hi 1).1) (hj₁ ▸ (hi 1).2)
have hadj (i : Fin 4) : (boxGraph n).Adj (v i) (v (i+1)) :=
(boxGraph_adj_iff _ _).mpr ⟨e i,he i⟩
have h₁ : v 1=faceCorner f (k+1) ∨ v 1=faceCorner f (k+3) :=
square_common_neighbors f k (v 1) (h₀ ▸ hadj 0) (h₂ ▸ (hadj 1).symm)
have h₃ : v 3=faceCorner f (k+1) ∨ v 3=faceCorner f (k+3) :=
square_common_neighbors f k (v 3) (h₀ ▸ (hadj 3).symm) (h₂ ▸ hadj 2)
have hv₁₃ : v 1 ≠ v 3 := fun h => (by decide : (1 : Fin 4) ≠ 3) (hv h)
have sufficient (J : Fin 4 → Fin 4) (hJ : ∀ i, v i = faceCorner f (J i))
(hA : ∀ i, AdjacentIndex (J i) (J (i+1))) : ∀ i, cycle f (e i) ≠ 0 := by
intro i
exact edge_on_face f _ _ (e i) (hA i) (hJ i ▸ (hi i).1) (hJ (i+1) ▸ (hi i).2)
refine ⟨f,?_⟩
rcases h₁ with h₁|h₁
all_goals rcases h₃ with h₃|h₃
· exact (hv₁₃ (h₁.trans h₃.symm)).elim
· refine sufficient ![k,k+1,k+2,k+3] ?_ ?_
· intro i; fin_cases i <;> assumption
· have h : ∀ k i : Fin 4, AdjacentIndex (![k,k+1,k+2,k+3] i)
(![k,k+1,k+2,k+3] (i+1)) := by unfold AdjacentIndex; decide
exact h k
· refine sufficient ![k,k+3,k+2,k+1] ?_ ?_
· intro i; fin_cases i <;> assumption
· have h : ∀ k i : Fin 4, AdjacentIndex (![k,k+3,k+2,k+1] i)
(![k,k+3,k+2,k+1] (i+1)) := by unfold AdjacentIndex; decide
exact h k
· exact (hv₁₃ (h₁.trans h₃.symm)).elim
end
noncomputable section
open Classical Support
variable {n : ℕ} {b : Vertex n → Scalar}
structure CycleFrame (n : ℕ) where
vertex : Fin 4 → Vertex n
edge : Fin 4 → Edge n
vertex_injective : Function.Injective vertex
edge_injective : Function.Injective edge
endpoints : ∀ i, (vertex i = tail (edge i) ∧ vertex (i+1) = head (edge i)) ∨
(vertex (i+1) = tail (edge i) ∧ vertex i = head (edge i))
namespace CycleFrame
variable (C : CycleFrame n)
def face : Face n := (indexed_fourcycle_is_face C.vertex C.edge C.vertex_injective C.edge_injective C.endpoints).choose
lemma on_face (i : Fin 4) : cycle C.face (C.edge i) ≠ 0 :=
(indexed_fourcycle_is_face C.vertex C.edge C.vertex_injective C.edge_injective C.endpoints).choose_spec i
lemma incident_ends (i : Fin 4) : incident (C.vertex i) (C.edge i) ∧ incident (C.vertex (i+1)) (C.edge i) :=
indexed_cycle_incident C.vertex C.edge C.endpoints i
lemma consecutive_axis_ne (i : Fin 4) : edgeAxis (C.edge i) ≠ edgeAxis (C.edge (i+1)) := by
have hadd : Function.Injective (fun j : Fin 4 => i+j) := by
have h : ∀ i j k : Fin 4, i+j=i+k → j=k := by decide
exact h i
have hh := square_consecutive_perpendicular (fun j => C.vertex (i+j)) (fun j => C.edge (i+j))
(C.vertex_injective.comp hadd) (fun j => by simpa only [add_assoc] using C.endpoints (i+j))
simpa only [add_zero] using hh
lemma adjacent_axis_ne (i j : Fin 4) (h : AdjacentIndex i j) : edgeAxis (C.edge i) ≠ edgeAxis (C.edge j) := by
rcases h with rfl | rfl
· exact C.consecutive_axis_ne i
· exact (C.consecutive_axis_ne j).symm
lemma support_iff (e : Edge n) : cycle C.face e ≠ 0 ↔ ∃ i, e = C.edge i := by
choose J hJ using fun i => support_cycle C.face (C.edge i) (C.on_face i)
have hJi : Function.Injective J := by
intro i j hh
apply C.edge_injective
exact (hJ i).symm.trans (hh ▸ hJ j)
constructor
· intro he
obtain ⟨k,hk⟩ := support_cycle C.face e he
obtain ⟨i,rfl⟩ := Finite.surjective_of_injective hJi k
exact ⟨i,hk.symm.trans (hJ i)⟩
· rintro ⟨i,rfl⟩
exact C.on_face i
lemma face_unique (f : Face n) (hf : ∀ i, cycle f (C.edge i) ≠ 0) : C.face = f :=
common_face_unique (C.edge 0) (C.edge 1) (C.consecutive_axis_ne 0)
(C.on_face 0) (C.on_face 1) (hf 0) (hf 1)
def joint (i j : Fin 4) : Vertex n := if j=i+1 then C.vertex j else C.vertex i
lemma joint_incident (i j : Fin 4) (h : AdjacentIndex i j) :
incident (C.joint i j) (C.edge i) ∧ incident (C.joint i j) (C.edge j) := by
unfold joint
split_ifs with he
· subst j
exact ⟨(C.incident_ends i).2,(C.incident_ends (i+1)).1⟩
· have hi : i=j+1 := h.resolve_left he
subst i
exact ⟨(C.incident_ends (j+1)).1,(C.incident_ends j).2⟩
def Across (i j : Fin 4) (s : LocalGroup (C.edge i)) (t : LocalGroup (C.edge j)) : Prop :=
∃ hi : incident (C.joint i j) (C.edge i), ∃ hj : incident (C.joint i j) (C.edge j),
∃ c : Configuration b (C.joint i j), c.state ⟨C.edge i,hi⟩ = s ∧ c.state ⟨C.edge j,hj⟩ = t
lemma across_iff (hn : 1 ≤ n) (i j : Fin 4) (h : AdjacentIndex i j)
(s : LocalGroup (C.edge i)) (t : LocalGroup (C.edge j)) :
C.Across (b := b) i j s t ↔ s.face ⟨C.face,C.on_face i⟩ = t.face ⟨C.face,C.on_face j⟩ := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hi,hj,c,hs,ht⟩
simpa only [hs,ht] using c.compatible ⟨_,hi⟩ ⟨_,hj⟩ C.face (C.on_face i) (C.on_face j)
· intro hs
obtain ⟨hi,hj⟩ := C.joint_incident i j h
have he : (⟨C.edge i,hi⟩ : IncidentEdges (C.joint i j)) ≠ ⟨C.edge j,hj⟩ := by
intro hh
exact C.adjacent_axis_ne i j h (congrArg (edgeAxis ∘ Subtype.val) hh)
obtain ⟨c,hc,hc'⟩ := exists_configuration_two (b := b) hn ⟨_,hi⟩ ⟨_,hj⟩ he s t (by
intro f hfi hfj
have hf := common_face_unique _ _ (C.adjacent_axis_ne i j h) (C.on_face i) (C.on_face j) hfi hfj
subst f
exact hs)
exact ⟨hi,hj,c,hc,hc'⟩
def Match (i j : Fin 4) (s : LocalGroup (C.edge i)) (t : LocalGroup (C.edge j)) : Prop :=
if AdjacentIndex i j then C.Across (b := b) i j s t else
∃ q : LocalGroup (C.edge (i+1)), C.Across (b := b) i (i+1) s q ∧ C.Across (b := b) j (i+1) t q
lemma match_iff (hn : 1 ≤ n) (i j : Fin 4) (s : LocalGroup (C.edge i)) (t : LocalGroup (C.edge j)) :
C.Match (b := b) i j s t ↔ s.face ⟨C.face,C.on_face i⟩ = t.face ⟨C.face,C.on_face j⟩ := by
unfold Match
split_ifs with h
· exact C.across_iff hn i j h s t
· simp only [C.across_iff hn i (i+1) (index_next_adjacent i),
C.across_iff hn j (i+1) (nonadjacent_next i j h)]
constructor
· rintro ⟨q,hs,ht⟩
exact hs.trans ht.symm
· intro he
exact ⟨⟨fun _ => s.face ⟨C.face,C.on_face i⟩,0⟩,rfl,he.symm⟩
end CycleFrame
def standardFrame (f : Face n) : CycleFrame n where
vertex := faceCorner f
edge := faceSide f
vertex_injective := faceCorner_index_injective f
edge_injective := faceSide_injective_index f
endpoints i := by
have hi := (incident_faceSide f i (faceCorner f i)).mpr (Or.inl rfl)
have hj := (incident_faceSide f i (faceCorner f (i+1))).mpr (Or.inr rfl)
have hne : faceCorner f i ≠ faceCorner f (i+1) := by
intro hh
have he := faceCorner_index_injective f hh
have hbad : ∀ i : Fin 4, i ≠ i+1 := by decide
exact hbad i he
rcases hi with hi | hi <;> rcases hj with hj | hj
· exact (hne (hi.symm.trans hj)).elim
· exact Or.inr ⟨hj.symm,hi.symm⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨hi.symm,hj.symm⟩
· exact (hne (hi.symm.trans hj)).elim
@[simp] lemma standardFrame_face (f : Face n) : (standardFrame f).face = f :=
(standardFrame f).face_unique f (cycle_faceSide f)
end
end WitnessedSeparation.Grid
end OAI