roseking's picture
Add lean source and binary files (part 120)
f205175 verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
27 kB
import OAI.Probability.CubeShuffle.Basic
import OAI.Probability.CubeShuffle.ButterflyRoutes
namespace OAI
namespace CubeShuffle
open scoped BigOperators
open Filter
/-- A finite adaptive experiment. A `force` instruction aborts on the wrong bit;
it carries likelihood-ratio weight 2 on success. Ordinary queries have no cost.
Freshness is a theorem hypothesis BELOW ON THE ACTUAL QUERY TREE, not an
independence assumption about a subsequently selected event. -/
inductive QueryTree (ι : Type*)
| reject : QueryTree ι
| accept : QueryTree ι
| branch (i : ι) (zero one : QueryTree ι) : QueryTree ι
| force (i : ι) (b : Bool) (next : QueryTree ι) : QueryTree ι
namespace QueryTree
variable {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
def queries : QueryTree ι → Finset ι
| reject => ∅
| accept => ∅
| branch i zero one => insert i (queries zero ∪ queries one)
| force i _ next => insert i (queries next)
/-- No coin is requested twice along any branch of the experiment. -/
def Fresh : QueryTree ι → Prop
| reject => True
| accept => True
| branch i zero one => i ∉ queries zero ∧ i ∉ queries one ∧ Fresh zero ∧ Fresh one
| force i _ next => i ∉ queries next ∧ Fresh next
def weighted : QueryTree ι → (ι → Bool) → ℝ
| reject, _ => 0
| accept, _ => 1
| branch i zero one, ω => if ω i then weighted one ω else weighted zero ω
| force i b next, ω => if ω i = b then 2 * weighted next ω else 0
omit [DecidableEq ι] in
lemma weighted_nonneg (T : QueryTree ι) (ω : ι → Bool) : 0 ≤ T.weighted ω := by
induction T with
| reject => exact le_rfl
| accept => exact zero_le_one
| branch i zero one ih₀ ih₁ => simpa only [weighted] using ite_nonneg ih₁ ih₀
| force i b next ih => simpa only [weighted] using ite_nonneg (mul_nonneg (by norm_num) ih) le_rfl
lemma weighted_congr (T : QueryTree ι) {ω η : ι → Bool}
(h : ∀ i ∈ T.queries, ω i = η i) : T.weighted ω = T.weighted η := by
induction T with
| reject => rfl
| accept => rfl
| branch i zero one ih₀ ih₁ =>
have hi := h i (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _)
simp only [weighted, hi]
rw [ih₀ (fun j hj => h j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (Finset.mem_union_left _ hj))),
ih₁ (fun j hj => h j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem (Finset.mem_union_right _ hj)))]
| force i b next ih =>
have hi := h i (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _)
simp only [weighted, hi]
rw [ih (fun j hj => h j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj))]
lemma weighted_flip_of_not_mem (T : QueryTree ι) (i : ι) (hi : i ∉ T.queries)
(ω : ι → Bool) : T.weighted (flipCoin i ω) = T.weighted ω := by
apply weighted_congr
intro j hj
exact flipCoin_apply_ne i j (fun h => hi (h ▸ hj)) ω
/-- Sequential forcing identity/inequality. Its weight is determined by the
realized trace; there is no conditioning on a favorable choice of certificate. -/
lemma mean_weighted_le_one [Fintype ι] (T : QueryTree ι) (hT : T.Fresh) :
finiteMean T.weighted ≤ 1 := by
induction T with
| reject => simp [weighted, finiteMean]
| accept => simp [weighted, finiteMean]
| branch i zero one ih₀ ih₁ =>
obtain ⟨hz, ho, hfz, hfo⟩ := hT
have h₀ := mean_indicator_bit zero.weighted i false (zero.weighted_flip_of_not_mem i hz)
have h₁ := mean_indicator_bit one.weighted i true (one.weighted_flip_of_not_mem i ho)
have he : finiteMean (branch i zero one).weighted =
finiteMean (fun ω => if ω i = false then zero.weighted ω else 0) +
finiteMean (fun ω => if ω i = true then one.weighted ω else 0) := by
unfold finiteMean
rw [← add_div, ← Finset.sum_add_distrib]
congr 1
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro ω _
cases hω : ω i <;> simp [weighted, hω]
rw [he, h₀, h₁]
linarith [ih₀ hfz, ih₁ hfo]
| force i b next ih =>
obtain ⟨hi, hn⟩ := hT
have hm := mean_indicator_bit next.weighted i b (next.weighted_flip_of_not_mem i hi)
have he : finiteMean (force i b next).weighted =
2 * finiteMean (fun ω => if ω i = b then next.weighted ω else 0) := by
unfold finiteMean
rw [← mul_div_assoc, Finset.mul_sum]
congr 1
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro ω _
by_cases h : ω i = b <;> simp [weighted, h]
rw [he, hm]
linarith [ih hn]
def succeeds : QueryTree ι → (ι → Bool) → Bool
| reject, _ => false
| accept, _ => true
| branch i zero one, ω => if ω i then succeeds one ω else succeeds zero ω
| force i b next, ω => if ω i = b then succeeds next ω else false
/-- Number of successful forced fresh-bit queries along the realized trace. -/
def charge : QueryTree ι → (ι → Bool) → ℕ
| reject, _ => 0
| accept, _ => 0
| branch i zero one, ω => if ω i then charge one ω else charge zero ω
| force i b next, ω => if ω i = b then charge next ω + 1 else 0
omit [DecidableEq ι] in
lemma weighted_eq (T : QueryTree ι) (ω : ι → Bool) :
T.weighted ω = if T.succeeds ω then (2 : ℝ) ^ T.charge ω else 0 := by
induction T with
| reject => rfl
| accept => norm_num [weighted, succeeds, charge]
| branch i zero one ih₀ ih₁ =>
cases h : ω i <;> simp [weighted, succeeds, charge, h, ih₀, ih₁]
| force i b next ih =>
by_cases h : ω i = b
· simp only [weighted, succeeds, charge, h, ↓reduceIte, ih]
cases hs : next.succeeds ω <;> simp [pow_succ, mul_comm]
· simp [weighted, succeeds, h]
/-- Acceptance probability is at most `2^(-K)` whenever every accepted trace
contains at least `K` forced fresh bits; unsuccessful shorter traces need not
make `K` queries. This is precisely the stopping-threshold issue in the fixed
certificate proof (`10-network.tex:84`). -/
lemma success_probability_le [Fintype ι] (T : QueryTree ι) (hT : T.Fresh)
(K : ℕ) (hK : ∀ ω, T.succeeds ω = true → K ≤ T.charge ω) :
finiteMean (fun ω => if T.succeeds ω then (1 : ℝ) else 0) ≤ 1 / (2 : ℝ) ^ K := by
have hw (ω : ι → Bool) :
(2 : ℝ) ^ K * (if T.succeeds ω then (1 : ℝ) else 0) ≤ T.weighted ω := by
rw [weighted_eq]
cases hs : T.succeeds ω
· simp
· simpa using pow_le_pow_right₀ (show (1 : ℝ) ≤ 2 by norm_num) (hK ω hs)
have hn : 0 ≤ (Fintype.card (ι → Bool) : ℝ) := Nat.cast_nonneg _
have hm := div_le_div_of_nonneg_right
(Finset.sum_le_sum (fun ω (_ : ω ∈ Finset.univ) => hw ω)) hn
rw [← Finset.mul_sum, mul_div_assoc] at hm
change (2 : ℝ) ^ K * finiteMean (fun ω => if T.succeeds ω then 1 else 0) ≤
finiteMean T.weighted at hm
exact (le_div_iff₀ (pow_pos (by norm_num) K)).mpr (by
rw [mul_comm]
exact hm.trans (mean_weighted_le_one T hT))
end QueryTree
namespace QueryTree
variable {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
/-- Eliminate repeated queries against an explicit exposure record. Repeated
forced bits test compatibility but acquire no likelihood-ratio factor. -/
def memo : QueryTree ι → Finset ι → (ι → Bool) → QueryTree ι
| reject, _, _ => reject
| accept, _, _ => accept
| branch i zero one, R, η =>
if i ∈ R then (if η i then memo one R η else memo zero R η) else
branch i (memo zero (insert i R) (Function.update η i false))
(memo one (insert i R) (Function.update η i true))
| force i b next, R, η =>
if i ∈ R then (if η i = b then memo next R η else reject) else
force i b (memo next (insert i R) (Function.update η i b))
lemma memo_queries_disjoint (T : QueryTree ι) (R : Finset ι) (η : ι → Bool) :
Disjoint (memo T R η).queries R := by
induction T generalizing R η with
| reject => simp [memo,queries]
| accept => simp [memo,queries]
| branch i zero one ih₀ ih₁ =>
by_cases hi : i ∈ R
· simp only [memo,hi,↓reduceIte]
cases η i <;> simp only [Bool.false_eq_true,↓reduceIte]
· exact ih₀ R η
· exact ih₁ R η
· simp only [memo,hi,↓reduceIte,queries,Finset.disjoint_insert_left,Finset.disjoint_union_left]
exact ⟨by simp, (ih₀ (insert i R) _).mono_right (Finset.subset_insert _ _),
(ih₁ (insert i R) _).mono_right (Finset.subset_insert _ _)⟩
| force i b next ih =>
by_cases hi : i ∈ R
· simp only [memo,hi,↓reduceIte]
by_cases hb : η i = b
· simpa only [hb,↓reduceIte] using ih R η
· simp [hb,queries]
· simp only [memo,hi,↓reduceIte,queries,Finset.disjoint_insert_left]
exact ⟨by simp,(ih (insert i R) _).mono_right (Finset.subset_insert _ _)⟩
lemma memo_fresh (T : QueryTree ι) (R : Finset ι) (η : ι → Bool) :
(memo T R η).Fresh := by
induction T generalizing R η with
| reject => trivial
| accept => trivial
| branch i zero one ih₀ ih₁ =>
by_cases hi : i ∈ R
· simp only [memo,hi,↓reduceIte]
cases η i <;> simp only [Bool.false_eq_true,↓reduceIte]
· exact ih₀ R η
· exact ih₁ R η
· simp only [memo,hi,↓reduceIte,Fresh]
exact ⟨fun hm => Finset.disjoint_left.mp (memo_queries_disjoint zero (insert i R) _) hm
(Finset.mem_insert_self _ _),
fun hm => Finset.disjoint_left.mp (memo_queries_disjoint one (insert i R) _) hm
(Finset.mem_insert_self _ _), ih₀ _ _,ih₁ _ _⟩
| force i b next ih =>
by_cases hi : i ∈ R
· simp only [memo,hi,↓reduceIte]
by_cases hb : η i = b
· simpa only [hb,↓reduceIte] using ih R η
· simp [hb,Fresh]
· simp only [memo,hi,↓reduceIte,Fresh]
exact ⟨fun hm => Finset.disjoint_left.mp (memo_queries_disjoint next (insert i R) _) hm
(Finset.mem_insert_self _ _),ih _ _⟩
lemma update_agrees {R : Finset ι} {η ω : ι → Bool}
(h : ∀ i ∈ R, η i = ω i) (i : ι) :
∀ j ∈ insert i R, Function.update η i (ω i) j = ω j := by
intro j hj
rcases Finset.mem_insert.mp hj with rfl | hj
· simp
· by_cases hji : j = i
· subst j; simp
· rw [Function.update_of_ne hji]
exact h j hj
lemma memo_succeeds (T : QueryTree ι) (R : Finset ι) (η ω : ι → Bool)
(h : ∀ i ∈ R, η i = ω i) : (memo T R η).succeeds ω = T.succeeds ω := by
induction T generalizing R η with
| reject => rfl
| accept => rfl
| branch i zero one ih₀ ih₁ =>
by_cases hi : i ∈ R
· simp only [memo,hi,↓reduceIte,succeeds,h i hi]
cases ω i <;> simp only [Bool.false_eq_true,↓reduceIte]
· exact ih₀ R η h
· exact ih₁ R η h
· simp only [memo,hi,↓reduceIte,succeeds]
cases hb : ω i <;> simp only [Bool.false_eq_true,↓reduceIte]
· exact ih₀ _ _ (by simpa only [hb] using update_agrees h i)
· exact ih₁ _ _ (by simpa only [hb] using update_agrees h i)
| force i b next ih =>
by_cases hi : i ∈ R
· simp only [memo,hi,↓reduceIte,h i hi]
by_cases hb : ω i = b
· simp only [hb,↓reduceIte,succeeds]
exact ih R η h
· simp [hb,succeeds]
· simp only [memo,hi,↓reduceIte,succeeds]
by_cases hb : ω i = b
· simp only [hb,↓reduceIte]
exact ih _ _ (by simpa only [hb] using update_agrees h i)
· simp [hb]
/-- Forced bits counted only when fresh; ordinary path queries insert their
bits into the same record, so subsequent closures cannot charge them twice. -/
def freshCharge : QueryTree ι → Finset ι → (ι → Bool) → ℕ
| reject, _, _ => 0
| accept, _, _ => 0
| branch i zero one, R, ω => if ω i then freshCharge one (insert i R) ω else freshCharge zero (insert i R) ω
| force i b next, R, ω => if ω i = b then
freshCharge next (insert i R) ω + (if i ∈ R then 0 else 1) else 0
lemma memo_charge (T : QueryTree ι) (R : Finset ι) (η ω : ι → Bool)
(h : ∀ i ∈ R, η i = ω i) : (memo T R η).charge ω = freshCharge T R ω := by
induction T generalizing R η with
| reject => rfl
| accept => rfl
| branch i zero one ih₀ ih₁ =>
by_cases hi : i ∈ R
· simp only [memo,hi,↓reduceIte,freshCharge,h i hi,Finset.insert_eq_of_mem hi]
cases ω i <;> simp only [Bool.false_eq_true,↓reduceIte]
· exact ih₀ R η h
· exact ih₁ R η h
· simp only [memo,hi,↓reduceIte,charge,freshCharge]
cases hb : ω i <;> simp only [Bool.false_eq_true,↓reduceIte]
· exact ih₀ _ _ (by simpa only [hb] using update_agrees h i)
· exact ih₁ _ _ (by simpa only [hb] using update_agrees h i)
| force i b next ih =>
by_cases hi : i ∈ R
· simp only [memo,hi,↓reduceIte,h i hi,freshCharge,Finset.insert_eq_of_mem hi,Nat.add_zero]
by_cases hb : ω i = b
· simp only [hb,↓reduceIte]
exact ih R η h
· simp [hb,charge]
· simp only [memo,hi,↓reduceIte,charge,freshCharge]
by_cases hb : ω i = b
· simp only [hb,↓reduceIte]
rw [ih _ _ (by simpa only [hb] using update_agrees h i)]
· simp [hb]
/-- Adaptive weighted closing constraints remain valid with arbitrary repeated
ordinary/closing queries, after accounting exactly for exposed coins. -/
lemma mean_freshCharge_le_one [Fintype ι] (T : QueryTree ι) :
finiteMean (fun ω : ι → Bool =>
if T.succeeds ω then (2:ℝ) ^ T.freshCharge ∅ ω else 0) ≤ 1 := by
let η : ι → Bool := fun _ => false
have hm := mean_weighted_le_one (memo T ∅ η) (memo_fresh T ∅ η)
have he : finiteMean (memo T ∅ η).weighted =
finiteMean (fun ω : ι → Bool =>
if T.succeeds ω then (2:ℝ) ^ T.freshCharge ∅ ω else 0) := by
apply finiteMean_congr
intro ω
rw [weighted_eq, memo_succeeds _ _ _ _ (by simp), memo_charge _ _ _ _ (by simp)]
rw [he] at hm
exact hm
end QueryTree
namespace QueryTree
variable {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
/-- Query just the switches on one actual butterfly route, then pass its
endpoint to a continuation. The index map permits parallel sub-butterflies. -/
def followPath : (d : ℕ) → (SwitchIndex d → ι) → Card d →
(Card d → QueryTree ι) → QueryTree ι
| 0, _, x, k => k x
| d + 1, e, x, k => followPath d (fun i => e (Sum.inr (x 0,i))) (Fin.tail x)
(fun y => branch (e (Sum.inl y))
(k (Fin.cons (Bool.xor (x 0) false) y))
(k (Fin.cons (Bool.xor (x 0) true) y)))
omit [DecidableEq ι] in
lemma followPath_succeeds (d : ℕ) (e : SwitchIndex d → ι) (x : Card d)
(k : Card d → QueryTree ι) (ω : ι → Bool) :
(followPath d e x k).succeeds ω =
(k (butterflyPerm d (decodeButterfly d (ω ∘ e)) x)).succeeds ω := by
induction d with
| zero => rfl
| succ d ih =>
rw [followPath, ih]
let y := butterflyPerm d
(decodeButterfly d (fun i => ω (e (Sum.inr (x 0,i))))) (Fin.tail x)
change (if ω (e (Sum.inl y)) then
(k (Fin.cons (Bool.xor (x 0) true) y)).succeeds ω else
(k (Fin.cons (Bool.xor (x 0) false) y)).succeeds ω) =
(k (Fin.cons (Bool.xor (x 0) (ω (e (Sum.inl y)))) y)).succeeds ω
cases ω (e (Sum.inl y)) <;> rfl
lemma followPath_charge (d : ℕ) (e : SwitchIndex d → ι) (x : Card d)
(k : Card d → QueryTree ι) (R : Finset ι) (ω : ι → Bool) :
freshCharge (followPath d e x k) R ω =
freshCharge (k (butterflyPerm d (decodeButterfly d (ω ∘ e)) x))
(R ∪ (routeDomain d x (butterflyPerm d (decodeButterfly d (ω ∘ e)) x)).image e) ω := by
classical
induction d generalizing R with
| zero => simp only [followPath, routeDomain, Finset.image_empty, Finset.union_empty]; rfl
| succ d ih =>
rw [followPath, ih]
let y := butterflyPerm d
(decodeButterfly d (fun i => ω (e (Sum.inr (x 0,i))))) (Fin.tail x)
let S := (routeDomain d (Fin.tail x) y).image (fun i => e (Sum.inr (x 0,i)))
change (if ω (e (Sum.inl y)) then
freshCharge (k (Fin.cons (Bool.xor (x 0) true) y)) (insert (e (Sum.inl y)) (R ∪ S)) ω else
freshCharge (k (Fin.cons (Bool.xor (x 0) false) y)) (insert (e (Sum.inl y)) (R ∪ S)) ω) =
freshCharge (k (Fin.cons (Bool.xor (x 0) (ω (e (Sum.inl y)))) y))
(R ∪ (routeDomain (d+1) x
(Fin.cons (Bool.xor (x 0) (ω (e (Sum.inl y)))) y)).image e) ω
have hs : (routeDomain (d+1) x
(Fin.cons (Bool.xor (x 0) (ω (e (Sum.inl y)))) y)).image e =
insert (e (Sum.inl y)) S := by
let e' : Sum (Card d) (Bool × SwitchIndex d) → ι := e
change (insert (Sum.inl y)
((routeDomain d (Fin.tail x) y).image
(fun i => (Sum.inr (x 0,i) : Sum (Card d) (Bool × SwitchIndex d)))) :
Finset (Sum (Card d) (Bool × SwitchIndex d))).image e' = _
rw [Finset.image_insert, Finset.image_image]
rfl
rw [hs,Finset.union_insert]
cases ω (e (Sum.inl y)) <;> rfl
/-- Force a finite list of coin requirements; compatibility with previous
ordinary or forced queries is handled by `memo`. -/
def forceList : List ι → (ι → Bool) → QueryTree ι → QueryTree ι
| [], _, k => k
| i :: L, v, k => force i (v i) (forceList L v k)
omit [DecidableEq ι] in
lemma forceList_succeeds (L : List ι) (v : ι → Bool) (k : QueryTree ι) (ω : ι → Bool) :
(forceList L v k).succeeds ω =
if ∀ i ∈ L, ω i = v i then k.succeeds ω else false := by
induction L with
| nil => simp [forceList]
| cons i L ih =>
simp only [forceList,succeeds,ih,List.mem_cons,forall_eq_or_imp]
by_cases h : ω i = v i <;> simp [h]
lemma forceList_charge (L : List ι) (v : ι → Bool) (k : QueryTree ι)
(R : Finset ι) (ω : ι → Bool) (h : ∀ i ∈ L, ω i = v i) :
freshCharge (forceList L v k) R ω =
freshCharge k (R ∪ L.toFinset) ω + (L.toFinset \ R).card := by
induction L generalizing R with
| nil => simp [forceList]
| cons i L ih =>
rw [forceList,freshCharge,ite_eq_left (h i List.mem_cons_self),
ih (insert i R) (fun j hj => h j (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hj))]
simp only [List.toFinset_cons]
have hs : insert i R ∪ L.toFinset = R ∪ insert i L.toFinset := by ext j; simp
rw [hs]
by_cases hi : i ∈ R
· rw [ite_eq_left hi]
have he : L.toFinset \ insert i R = insert i L.toFinset \ R := by
ext j
by_cases hji : j = i
· subst j; simp [hi]
· simp [hji]
rw [he,Nat.add_zero]
· rw [ite_eq_right hi]
have he : insert i L.toFinset \ R = insert i (L.toFinset \ insert i R) := by
ext j
by_cases hji : j = i
· subst j; simp [hi]
· simp [hji]
rw [he, Finset.card_insert_of_notMem (by simp)]
omega
end QueryTree
namespace QueryTree
variable {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι]
/-- The number of forced queries already determined by earlier exposures. -/
def staleCharge : QueryTree ι → Finset ι → (ι → Bool) → ℕ
| reject, _, _ => 0
| accept, _, _ => 0
| branch i zero one, R, ω => if ω i then staleCharge one (insert i R) ω
else staleCharge zero (insert i R) ω
| force i b next, R, ω => if ω i = b then
staleCharge next (insert i R) ω + (if i ∈ R then 1 else 0) else 0
lemma fresh_add_stale (T : QueryTree ι) (R : Finset ι) (ω : ι → Bool) :
T.freshCharge R ω + T.staleCharge R ω = T.charge ω := by
induction T generalizing R with
| reject => rfl
| accept => rfl
| branch i zero one ih₀ ih₁ =>
cases hb : ω i <;> simp [freshCharge,staleCharge,charge,hb,ih₀,ih₁]
| force i b next ih =>
by_cases hb : ω i = b
· simp only [freshCharge,staleCharge,charge,hb,↓reduceIte]
have he := ih (insert i R)
by_cases hi : i ∈ R <;> simp only [hi,↓reduceIte] <;> omega
· simp [freshCharge,staleCharge,charge,hb]
omit [DecidableEq ι] in
lemma followPath_raw_charge (d : ℕ) (e : SwitchIndex d → ι) (x : Card d)
(k : Card d → QueryTree ι) (ω : ι → Bool) :
(followPath d e x k).charge ω =
(k (butterflyPerm d (decodeButterfly d (ω ∘ e)) x)).charge ω := by
induction d with
| zero => rfl
| succ d ih =>
rw [followPath, ih]
let y := butterflyPerm d
(decodeButterfly d (fun i => ω (e (Sum.inr (x 0,i))))) (Fin.tail x)
change (if ω (e (Sum.inl y)) then
(k (Fin.cons (Bool.xor (x 0) true) y)).charge ω else
(k (Fin.cons (Bool.xor (x 0) false) y)).charge ω) =
(k (Fin.cons (Bool.xor (x 0) (ω (e (Sum.inl y)))) y)).charge ω
cases ω (e (Sum.inl y)) <;> rfl
omit [DecidableEq ι] in
lemma forceList_raw_charge (L : List ι) (v : ι → Bool) (k : QueryTree ι) (ω : ι → Bool)
(h : ∀ i ∈ L, ω i = v i) :
(forceList L v k).charge ω = k.charge ω + L.length := by
induction L with
| nil => simp [forceList]
| cons i L ih =>
rw [forceList,charge,ite_eq_left (h i List.mem_cons_self),
ih (fun j hj => h j (List.mem_cons_of_mem _ hj))]
simp only [List.length_cons,Nat.add_assoc]
/-- A closing path has a specified endpoint rather than an adaptively chosen
one. It issues exactly the route's coin requirements. -/
noncomputable def closePath (d : ℕ) (x y : Card d) (k : QueryTree (SwitchIndex d)) :
QueryTree (SwitchIndex d) :=
forceList (routeDomain d x y).toList (routeValue d x y) k
lemma closePath_succeeds (d : ℕ) (x y : Card d) (k : QueryTree (SwitchIndex d))
(ω : SwitchIndex d → Bool) :
(closePath d x y k).succeeds ω =
if butterflyPerm d (decodeButterfly d ω) x = y then k.succeeds ω else false := by
unfold closePath
rw [forceList_succeeds]
simp only [Finset.mem_toList, ← butterfly_endpoint_iff]
lemma closePath_raw_charge (d : ℕ) (x y : Card d) (k : QueryTree (SwitchIndex d))
(ω : SwitchIndex d → Bool) (h : butterflyPerm d (decodeButterfly d ω) x = y) :
(closePath d x y k).charge ω = k.charge ω + d := by
unfold closePath
rw [forceList_raw_charge _ _ _ _ (by simpa only [Finset.mem_toList] using
(butterfly_endpoint_iff d ω x y).mp h), Finset.length_toList, card_routeDomain]
lemma closePath_fresh_charge (d : ℕ) (x y : Card d) (k : QueryTree (SwitchIndex d))
(R : Finset (SwitchIndex d)) (ω : SwitchIndex d → Bool)
(h : butterflyPerm d (decodeButterfly d ω) x = y) :
(closePath d x y k).freshCharge R ω =
k.freshCharge (R ∪ routeDomain d x y) ω + (routeDomain d x y \ R).card := by
unfold closePath
rw [forceList_charge _ _ _ _ _ (by simpa only [Finset.mem_toList] using
(butterfly_endpoint_iff d ω x y).mp h), Finset.toList_toFinset]
lemma closePath_stale_charge (d : ℕ) (x y : Card d) (k : QueryTree (SwitchIndex d))
(R : Finset (SwitchIndex d)) (ω : SwitchIndex d → Bool)
(h : butterflyPerm d (decodeButterfly d ω) x = y) :
(closePath d x y k).staleCharge R ω =
k.staleCharge (R ∪ routeDomain d x y) ω + (routeDomain d x y ∩ R).card := by
have h₀ := fresh_add_stale (closePath d x y k) R ω
have h₁ := fresh_add_stale k (R ∪ routeDomain d x y) ω
rw [closePath_raw_charge _ _ _ _ _ h,closePath_fresh_charge _ _ _ _ _ _ h] at h₀
have h₂ : (routeDomain d x y \ R).card + (routeDomain d x y ∩ R).card = d := by
rw [Finset.card_sdiff_add_card_inter,card_routeDomain]
omega
/-- Inspect one proposed length-(r+1) cycle. Every queried input must be in S
and must not have appeared in an earlier slot or earlier in this cycle. -/
noncomputable def seekCycle (d : ℕ) (S : Finset (Card d)) (a : Card d) :
ℕ → Card d → Finset (Card d) → (Finset (Card d) → QueryTree (SwitchIndex d)) →
QueryTree (SwitchIndex d)
| 0, x, V, k => if x ∈ S ∧ x ∉ V then closePath d x a (k (insert x V)) else reject
| r + 1, x, V, k => if x ∈ S ∧ x ∉ V then followPath d id x
(fun y => seekCycle d S a r y (insert x V) k) else reject
lemma seekCycle_raw_charge (d : ℕ) (S : Finset (Card d)) (a : Card d) (r : ℕ)
(x : Card d) (V : Finset (Card d)) (k : Finset (Card d) → QueryTree (SwitchIndex d))
(ω : SwitchIndex d → Bool) (K : ℕ)
(hK : ∀ V, (k V).succeeds ω = true → (k V).charge ω = K)
(hs : (seekCycle d S a r x V k).succeeds ω = true) :
(seekCycle d S a r x V k).charge ω = K + d := by
induction r generalizing x V with
| zero =>
by_cases hv : x ∈ S ∧ x ∉ V
· rw [seekCycle,ite_eq_left hv,closePath_succeeds] at hs
split_ifs at hs with he
· rw [seekCycle,ite_eq_left hv,closePath_raw_charge _ _ _ _ _ he,hK _ hs]
· simp [seekCycle,hv,succeeds] at hs
| succ r ih =>
by_cases hv : x ∈ S ∧ x ∉ V
· rw [seekCycle,ite_eq_left hv,followPath_succeeds] at hs
rw [seekCycle,ite_eq_left hv,followPath_raw_charge]
exact ih _ _ hs
· simp [seekCycle,hv,succeeds] at hs
/-- Distinguishable cycle slots, with each requested length encoded as r+1.
Later factorial-moment counting divides by precisely these rotation counts. -/
noncomputable def seekCycles (d : ℕ) (S : Finset (Card d)) :
List (Card d × ℕ) → Finset (Card d) → QueryTree (SwitchIndex d)
| [], _ => accept
| (a,r) :: L, V => seekCycle d S a r a V (fun V => seekCycles d S L V)
lemma seekCycles_raw_charge (d : ℕ) (S : Finset (Card d)) (L : List (Card d × ℕ))
(V : Finset (Card d)) (ω : SwitchIndex d → Bool)
(hs : (seekCycles d S L V).succeeds ω = true) :
(seekCycles d S L V).charge ω = L.length * d := by
induction L generalizing V with
| nil => simp [seekCycles,charge]
| cons ar L ih =>
obtain ⟨a,r⟩ := ar
rw [seekCycles]
rw [seekCycle_raw_charge d S a r a V (fun V => seekCycles d S L V) ω (L.length*d)
(fun V hs => ih V hs) hs]
simp [Nat.add_mul]
/-- The actual fixed-start weighted exploration inequality in FAC.3. The
stale charge counts exposed closing-path switches exactly, not a postulated
conditional-independence bound. Failure includes repeats, short cycles and
visiting outside the marked subset, and can occur at ANY earlier query. -/
lemma cycles_weighted_success (d : ℕ) (S : Finset (Card d)) (L : List (Card d × ℕ)) :
finiteMean (fun ω : SwitchIndex d → Bool =>
if (seekCycles d S L ∅).succeeds ω then
((2:ℝ)^d)^L.length / (2:ℝ)^(seekCycles d S L ∅).staleCharge ∅ ω else 0) ≤ 1 := by
let T := seekCycles d S L ∅
have hh := mean_freshCharge_le_one T
have he : finiteMean (fun ω : SwitchIndex d → Bool =>
if T.succeeds ω then (2:ℝ)^T.freshCharge ∅ ω else 0) =
finiteMean (fun ω : SwitchIndex d → Bool =>
if T.succeeds ω then ((2:ℝ)^d)^L.length / (2:ℝ)^T.staleCharge ∅ ω else 0) := by
apply finiteMean_congr
intro ω
cases hs : T.succeeds ω
· simp
· simp only [↓reduceIte]
have hc := fresh_add_stale T ∅ ω
rw [seekCycles_raw_charge d S L ∅ ω hs] at hc
have hp : ((2:ℝ)^d)^L.length = (2:ℝ)^T.freshCharge ∅ ω * (2:ℝ)^T.staleCharge ∅ ω := by
rw [←pow_add,hc,←pow_mul,Nat.mul_comm]
rw [hp,mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ (pow_ne_zero _ (by norm_num))]
rw [← he]
exact hh
end QueryTree
end CubeShuffle
end OAI