roseking's picture
Add lean source and binary files (part 121)
f61e547 verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
23.2 kB
import Mathlib
namespace OAI
/-! Cut/join identities for tour permutations. Fixed points are retained as
one-element cycles, as required by the Euler-characteristic map definition. -/
noncomputable section
open Equiv Equiv.Perm
open scoped BigOperators
namespace FKCRT.MapCycles
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α]
lemma formPerm_cut (a b : α) (L R : List α)
(h : (a :: (L ++ b :: R)).Nodup) :
(a :: (L ++ b :: R)).formPerm =
swap a b * (a :: L).formPerm * (b :: R).formPerm := by
induction L generalizing a with
| nil => simp
| cons c L ih =>
have hab : a ≠ b := fun he => h.notMem (by simp [he])
have hcb : c ≠ b := fun he => h.of_cons.notMem (by simp [he])
have hcomm : swap a c * swap c b = swap a b * swap a c := by
rw [mul_swap_eq_swap_mul]
simp [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (Ne.symm hab) (Ne.symm hcb)]
simp only [List.cons_append, List.formPerm_cons_cons]
rw [ih c h.of_cons]
simp only [← mul_assoc]
rw [hcomm]
lemma swap_mul_formPerm_cut (a b : α) (L R : List α)
(h : (a :: (L ++ b :: R)).Nodup) :
swap a b * (a :: (L ++ b :: R)).formPerm =
(a :: L).formPerm * (b :: R).formPerm := by
rw [formPerm_cut a b L R h]
simp [← mul_assoc]
lemma sameCycle_formPerm_of_mem {l : List α} (hn : l.Nodup)
{x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) : l.formPerm.SameCycle x y := by
rcases l with _ | ⟨a, _ | ⟨b, L⟩⟩
· simp at hx
· simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hx hy
exact (hx.trans hy.symm).sameCycle _
· apply (List.isCycle_formPerm hn (by simp)).sameCycle
· exact (List.formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hn _ hx).mpr (by simp)
· exact (List.formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hn _ hy).mpr (by simp)
lemma pow_eq_on_list (p : Perm α) (l : List α)
(hp : ∀ x ∈ l, p x = l.formPerm x) {x : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (k : ℕ) :
(p ^ k) x = (l.formPerm ^ k) x ∧ (p ^ k) x ∈ l := by
induction k with
| zero => exact ⟨rfl, hx⟩
| succ k ih =>
simp only [pow_succ', mul_apply]
exact ⟨(hp _ ih.2).trans (congrArg l.formPerm ih.1),
hp _ ih.2 ▸ l.formPerm_apply_mem_of_mem ih.2⟩
lemma sameCycle_of_list [Finite α] (p : Perm α) {l : List α} (hn : l.Nodup)
(hp : ∀ x ∈ l, p x = l.formPerm x) {x y : α} (hx : x ∈ l) (hy : y ∈ l) :
p.SameCycle x y := by
obtain ⟨k,hk⟩ := (sameCycle_formPerm_of_mem hn hx hy).exists_nat_pow_eq
exact ⟨k, by simpa using (pow_eq_on_list p l hp hx k).1.trans hk⟩
abbrev Orbits (p : Perm α) := Quotient (SameCycle.setoid p)
/-- A partition into nonempty cyclic lists counts all orbits, including fixed
points. The local action condition makes this independent of a chosen
representative of the quotient. -/
lemma card_orbits_eq_of_lists [Finite α] {β : Type*} [Finite β]
(p : Perm α) (l : β → List α) (hn : ∀ i, (l i).Nodup)
(hne : ∀ i, ∃ x, x ∈ l i)
(hc : ∀ x, ∃! i, x ∈ l i)
(hp : ∀ i x, x ∈ l i → p x = (l i).formPerm x) :
Nat.card (Orbits p) = Nat.card β := by
classical
let idx : α → β := fun x => (hc x).choose
have hm (x : α) : x ∈ l (idx x) := (hc x).choose_spec.1
have hu {x : α} {i : β} (hi : x ∈ l i) : idx x = i :=
((hc x).choose_spec.2 i hi).symm
have he {x y : α} : p.SameCycle x y ↔ idx x = idx y := by
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨k,hk⟩ := h.exists_nat_pow_eq
have hh := (pow_eq_on_list p (l (idx x)) (hp (idx x)) (hm x) k).2
rw [hk] at hh
exact (hu hh).symm
· intro h
exact sameCycle_of_list p (hn (idx x)) (hp (idx x)) (hm x) (h ▸ hm y)
let e : Orbits p ≃ β :=
{ toFun := Quotient.lift idx (fun _ _ h => he.mp h)
invFun := fun i => Quotient.mk _ ((hne i).choose)
left_inv := by
intro q
induction q using Quotient.inductionOn with
| h x =>
apply Quotient.sound
apply he.mpr
exact hu ((hne (idx x)).choose_spec)
right_inv := by
intro i
exact hu ((hne i).choose_spec) }
exact Nat.card_congr e
/-- Canonical cyclic list, retaining one-element fixed cycles. -/
def orbitList [Fintype α] (p : Perm α) (x : α) : List α :=
if p x = x then [x] else p.toList x
lemma nodup_orbitList [Fintype α] (p : Perm α) (x : α) :
(orbitList p x).Nodup := by
unfold orbitList
split_ifs <;> simp [nodup_toList]
lemma mem_orbitList [Fintype α] (p : Perm α) (x y : α) :
y ∈ orbitList p x ↔ p.SameCycle x y := by
classical
unfold orbitList
split_ifs with h
· simp only [List.mem_singleton]
exact ⟨fun he => (he.symm).sameCycle p,fun he => (he.eq_of_left h).symm⟩
· simp [mem_toList_iff,h]
lemma orbitList_action [Fintype α] (p : Perm α) (x y : α)
(hy : y ∈ orbitList p x) : p y = (orbitList p x).formPerm y := by
classical
have hxy := (mem_orbitList p x y).mp hy
unfold orbitList
split_ifs with h
· have he := hxy.eq_of_left h
subst y
simpa using h
· rw [formPerm_toList,hxy.cycleOf_apply]
/-- Splitting one part of a finite list partition into two consecutive,
nonempty pieces adds exactly one block, without discarding fixed points. -/
def splitFamily {β : Type*} [DecidableEq β] (l : β → List α) (i₀ : β)
(L R : List α) : ({i : β // i ≠ i₀} ⊕ Bool) → List α
| Sum.inl i => l i
| Sum.inr false => L
| Sum.inr true => R
omit [DecidableEq α] in
lemma splitFamily_partition {β : Type*} [DecidableEq β] (l : β → List α)
(hn : ∀ i, (l i).Nodup) (hc : ∀ x, ∃! i, x ∈ l i)
(i₀ : β) (L R : List α) (he : l i₀ = L ++ R) :
∀ x, ∃! i, x ∈ splitFamily l i₀ L R i := by
intro x
have hd : List.Disjoint L R := List.disjoint_iff_ne.mpr (List.nodup_append.mp (he ▸ hn i₀)).2.2
have hoff {i : β} (hi : i ≠ i₀) (hx : x ∈ l i) : x ∉ L ∧ x ∉ R := by
constructor <;> intro h
all_goals
have hh : x ∈ l i₀ := by rw [he]; simp [h]
exact hi (((hc x).unique hx hh))
have hinj : ∀ i j, x ∈ splitFamily l i₀ L R i →
x ∈ splitFamily l i₀ L R j → i = j := by
intro i j hi hj
cases i with
| inl i =>
cases j with
| inl j => exact congrArg Sum.inl (Subtype.ext ((hc x).unique hi hj))
| inr b => cases b
· exact ((hoff i.property hi).1 hj).elim
· exact ((hoff i.property hi).2 hj).elim
| inr b =>
cases j with
| inl j => cases b
· exact ((hoff j.property hj).1 hi).elim
· exact ((hoff j.property hj).2 hi).elim
| inr c =>
cases b <;> cases c
· rfl
· exact (List.disjoint_left.mp hd hi hj).elim
· exact (List.disjoint_left.mp hd hj hi).elim
· rfl
obtain ⟨i,hi,_⟩ := hc x
by_cases h : i = i₀
· subst i
rw [he,List.mem_append] at hi
rcases hi with hi | hi
· exact ⟨Sum.inr false,hi,fun j hj => hinj j _ hj hi⟩
· exact ⟨Sum.inr true,hi,fun j hj => hinj j _ hj hi⟩
· exact ⟨Sum.inl ⟨i,h⟩,hi,fun j hj => hinj j _ hj hi⟩
lemma card_orbits_cut [Finite α] {β : Type*} [Finite β]
(p : Perm α) (l : β → List α) (hn : ∀ i, (l i).Nodup)
(hne : ∀ i, ∃ x, x ∈ l i) (hc : ∀ x, ∃! i, x ∈ l i)
(hp : ∀ i x, x ∈ l i → p x = (l i).formPerm x)
(i₀ : β) (a b : α) (L R : List α)
(he : l i₀ = (a :: L) ++ (b :: R)) :
Nat.card (Orbits (swap a b * p)) = Nat.card (Orbits p) + 1 := by
classical
have hn₀ : ((a :: L) ++ (b :: R)).Nodup := he ▸ hn i₀
have hn₁ := (List.nodup_append.mp hn₀).1
have hn₂ := (List.nodup_append.mp hn₀).2.1
have hd : List.Disjoint (a :: L) (b :: R) :=
List.disjoint_iff_ne.mpr (List.nodup_append.mp hn₀).2.2
have ha : a ∈ l i₀ := by simp [he]
have hb : b ∈ l i₀ := by simp [he]
let ll := splitFamily l i₀ (a :: L) (b :: R)
have hnn (i) : (ll i).Nodup := by
cases i with
| inl i => exact hn i
| inr c => cases c <;> assumption
have hnee (i) : ∃ x, x ∈ ll i := by
cases i with
| inl i => exact hne i
| inr c => cases c
· exact ⟨a, List.mem_cons_self⟩
· exact ⟨b, List.mem_cons_self⟩
have hcc := splitFamily_partition l hn hc i₀ (a :: L) (b :: R) he
have hpp (i) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ ll i) :
(swap a b * p) x = (ll i).formPerm x := by
cases i with
| inl i =>
have hpx : p x ∈ l i := by rw [hp i x hx]; exact List.formPerm_apply_mem_of_mem hx
have hpa : p x ≠ a := fun h => i.property ((hc a).unique (h ▸ hpx) ha)
have hpb : p x ≠ b := fun h => i.property ((hc b).unique (h ▸ hpx) hb)
rw [mul_apply,swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hpa hpb]
exact hp i x hx
| inr c =>
have hcut := congrArg (fun u : Perm α => u x) (swap_mul_formPerm_cut a b L R hn₀)
cases c
· have hpx : p x = ((a :: L) ++ (b :: R)).formPerm x := by
rw [← he]; exact hp i₀ x (by rw [he]; exact List.mem_append_left _ hx)
have hxr : x ∉ b :: R := fun h => List.disjoint_left.mp hd hx h
simpa only [ll,splitFamily,List.cons_append,mul_apply,hpx,List.formPerm_apply_of_notMem hxr] using hcut
· have hpx : p x = ((a :: L) ++ (b :: R)).formPerm x := by
rw [← he]; exact hp i₀ x (by rw [he]; exact List.mem_append_right _ hx)
have hxl : (b :: R).formPerm x ∉ a :: L := fun h =>
List.disjoint_left.mp hd h (List.formPerm_apply_mem_of_mem hx)
simpa only [ll,splitFamily,List.cons_append,mul_apply,hpx,List.formPerm_apply_of_notMem hxl] using hcut
rw [card_orbits_eq_of_lists (swap a b * p) ll hnn hnee hcc hpp,
card_orbits_eq_of_lists p l hn hne hc hp]
let : Fintype β := Fintype.ofFinite β
simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card,Fintype.card_sum,Fintype.card_bool]
have hh' : Fintype.card {i : β // i ≠ i₀} = Fintype.card β - 1 := by simp
rw [hh']
have hpos : 0 < Fintype.card β := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr ⟨i₀⟩
omega
lemma orbitList_eq_cons [Fintype α] (p : Perm α) (a : α) :
∃ L, orbitList p a = a :: L := by
classical
by_cases ha : p a = a
· exact ⟨[], by simp [orbitList,ha]⟩
have hs : a ∈ p.support := mem_support.mpr ha
have h := p.toList_getElem_zero a hs
cases hl : p.toList a with
| nil => exact ((toList_eq_nil_iff.mp hl) hs).elim
| cons c L =>
simp only [hl,List.getElem_cons_zero] at h
subst c
exact ⟨L,by simp [orbitList,ha,hl]⟩
/-- Swapping two distinct members of one orbit cuts that orbit into two.
In particular one-element vertex/face cycles are not lost in the count. -/
theorem card_orbits_swap_of_sameCycle [Fintype α] (p : Perm α) {a b : α}
(hab : a ≠ b) (hs : p.SameCycle a b) :
Nat.card (Orbits (swap a b * p)) = Nat.card (Orbits p) + 1 := by
classical
let q₀ : Orbits p := Quotient.mk _ a
let r : Orbits p → α := fun q => if q = q₀ then a else q.out
have hr (q : Orbits p) : Quotient.mk _ (r q) = q := by
dsimp [r]
split_ifs with h
· exact h.symm
· exact Quotient.out_eq q
let l : Orbits p → List α := fun q => orbitList p (r q)
have hmem (x : α) (q : Orbits p) : x ∈ l q ↔ Quotient.mk _ x = q := by
change x ∈ orbitList p (r q) ↔ _
rw [mem_orbitList]
calc
p.SameCycle (r q) x ↔ Quotient.mk _ x = (Quotient.mk _ (r q) : Orbits p) :=
⟨fun h => Quotient.sound h.symm,fun h => (Quotient.exact h).symm⟩
_ ↔ _ := by rw [hr q]
have hc (x : α) : ∃! q, x ∈ l q := by
refine ⟨Quotient.mk _ x,(hmem x _).mpr rfl,?_⟩
exact fun q h => ((hmem x q).mp h).symm
have hne (q : Orbits p) : ∃ x, x ∈ l q := ⟨r q,(hmem _ _).mpr (hr q)⟩
obtain ⟨K,hK⟩ := orbitList_eq_cons p a
have hb : b ∈ K := by
have hh := (mem_orbitList p a b).mpr hs
rw [hK,List.mem_cons] at hh
exact hh.resolve_left (Ne.symm hab)
obtain ⟨L,R,hR⟩ := List.append_of_mem hb
apply card_orbits_cut p l (fun q => nodup_orbitList p (r q)) hne hc
(fun q x hx => orbitList_action p (r q) x hx) q₀ a b L R
simp only [l,r,ite_true,hK,hR,List.cons_append]
lemma sameCycle_swap_of_not_sameCycle [Fintype α] (p : Perm α) {a b : α}
(hs : ¬ p.SameCycle a b) : (swap a b * p).SameCycle a b := by
classical
obtain ⟨L,hL⟩ := orbitList_eq_cons p a
obtain ⟨R,hR⟩ := orbitList_eq_cons p b
have hnL : (a :: L).Nodup := hL ▸ nodup_orbitList p a
have hnR : (b :: R).Nodup := hR ▸ nodup_orbitList p b
have hd : List.Disjoint (a :: L) (b :: R) := by
apply List.disjoint_left.mpr
intro x hx hy
have hx' := (mem_orbitList p a x).mp (hL ▸ hx)
have hy' := (mem_orbitList p b x).mp (hR ▸ hy)
exact hs (hx'.trans hy'.symm)
have hn : ((a :: L) ++ (b :: R)).Nodup := by
exact List.nodup_append.mpr ⟨hnL,hnR,List.disjoint_iff_ne.mp hd⟩
apply sameCycle_of_list (swap a b * p) hn ?_ (by simp) (by simp)
intro x hx
have he := congrArg (fun u : Perm α => u x) (formPerm_cut a b L R hn)
simp only [mul_apply,List.cons_append] at he ⊢
rw [he]
congr 1
rcases List.mem_append.mp hx with hx | hx
· have hxr : x ∉ b :: R := fun hh => List.disjoint_left.mp hd hx hh
rw [List.formPerm_apply_of_notMem hxr]
simpa only [hL] using orbitList_action p a x (hL ▸ hx)
· have hxl : (b :: R).formPerm x ∉ a :: L := fun hh =>
List.disjoint_left.mp hd hh (List.formPerm_apply_mem_of_mem hx)
rw [List.formPerm_apply_of_notMem hxl]
simpa only [hR] using orbitList_action p b x (hR ▸ hx)
/-- Swapping members of distinct orbits joins precisely those two orbits. -/
theorem card_orbits_swap_of_not_sameCycle [Fintype α] (p : Perm α) {a b : α}
(hs : ¬ p.SameCycle a b) :
Nat.card (Orbits (swap a b * p)) + 1 = Nat.card (Orbits p) := by
have hab : a ≠ b := fun h => hs (h.sameCycle p)
have h := card_orbits_swap_of_sameCycle (swap a b * p) hab
(sameCycle_swap_of_not_sameCycle p hs)
simpa only [← mul_assoc,swap_mul_self,one_mul] using h.symm
/-- Each edge transposition changes Euler's orbit count by exactly one. -/
theorem card_orbits_swap_le [Fintype α] (p : Perm α) (a b : α) :
Nat.card (Orbits (swap a b * p)) ≤ Nat.card (Orbits p) + 1 := by
classical
by_cases hab : a = b
· subst b
have he : swap a a * p = p := by ext x; simp
rw [he]
omega
by_cases h : p.SameCycle a b
· exact (card_orbits_swap_of_sameCycle p hab h).le
· have hh := card_orbits_swap_of_not_sameCycle p h
omega
end FKCRT.MapCycles
end
noncomputable section
open Equiv Equiv.Perm
namespace FKCRT.MapCycles
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α]
omit [DecidableEq α] in
lemma sameCycle_mono {p q : Perm α}
(h : ∀ x,q.SameCycle x (p x)) {x y : α} (hxy : p.SameCycle x y) : q.SameCycle x y := by
obtain ⟨n,rfl⟩ := hxy.exists_nat_pow_eq
clear hxy
induction n with
| zero => simpa using SameCycle.refl q x
| succ n ih =>
rw [pow_succ',mul_apply]
exact ih.trans (h _)
/-- Swapping the outputs at two distinct rotation cycles preserves every
old vertex incidence and merges the indicated two vertices. -/
lemma sameCycle_le_vertexJoin (p : Perm α) {a b : α} (h : ¬p.SameCycle a b)
{x y : α} (hxy : p.SameCycle x y) : (swap a b*p).SameCycle x y := by
let q := swap a b*p
have hab : q.SameCycle a b := sameCycle_swap_of_not_sameCycle p h
apply sameCycle_mono (p := p) (q := q) ?_ hxy
intro d
have hd : q.SameCycle d (q d) := sameCycle_apply_right.mpr (SameCycle.refl q d)
by_cases ha : p d=a
· have he : q d=b := by simp [q,mul_apply,ha]
rw [ha]
exact (he ▸ hd).trans hab.symm
· by_cases hb : p d=b
· have he : q d=a := by simp [q,mul_apply,hb]
rw [hb]
exact (he ▸ hd).trans hab
· simpa [q,mul_apply,swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne ha hb] using hd
def JoinRel (p : Perm α) (a b x y : α) : Prop :=
p.SameCycle x y ∨
((p.SameCycle x a ∨ p.SameCycle x b) ∧ (p.SameCycle y a ∨ p.SameCycle y b))
omit [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] in
lemma JoinRel.refl (p : Perm α) (a b x : α) : JoinRel p a b x x :=
Or.inl (SameCycle.refl p x)
omit [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] in
lemma JoinRel.symm {p : Perm α} {a b x y : α} (h : JoinRel p a b x y) : JoinRel p a b y x := by
rcases h with h|⟨hx,hy⟩
· exact Or.inl h.symm
· exact Or.inr ⟨hy,hx⟩
omit [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] in
lemma JoinRel.trans {p : Perm α} {a b x y z : α}
(h : JoinRel p a b x y) (h' : JoinRel p a b y z) : JoinRel p a b x z := by
rcases h with h|⟨hx,hy⟩
· rcases h' with h'|⟨hy,hz⟩
· exact Or.inl (h.trans h')
· exact Or.inr ⟨hy.imp (h.trans) (h.trans),hz⟩
· rcases h' with h'|⟨_,hz⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨hx,hy.imp (h'.symm.trans) (h'.symm.trans)⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨hx,hz⟩
omit [Fintype α] in
lemma JoinRel.step (p : Perm α) (a b x : α) : JoinRel p a b x ((swap a b*p) x) := by
have hx : p.SameCycle x (p x) := sameCycle_apply_right.mpr (SameCycle.refl p x)
by_cases ha : p x=a
· rw [mul_apply,ha,swap_apply_left]
exact Or.inr ⟨Or.inl (ha ▸ hx),Or.inr (SameCycle.refl p b)⟩
· by_cases hb : p x=b
· rw [mul_apply,hb,swap_apply_right]
exact Or.inr ⟨Or.inr (hb ▸ hx),Or.inl (SameCycle.refl p a)⟩
· rw [mul_apply,swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne ha hb]
exact Or.inl hx
/-- Exact vertex equivalence after one-vertex gluing. In particular no
additional vertices are identified, including fixed points and loop blocks. -/
theorem sameCycle_vertexJoin_iff (p : Perm α) {a b : α} (h : ¬p.SameCycle a b) (x y : α) :
(swap a b*p).SameCycle x y ↔ JoinRel p a b x y := by
constructor
· intro hxy
obtain ⟨n,rfl⟩ := hxy.exists_nat_pow_eq
clear hxy
induction n with
| zero => simpa using JoinRel.refl p a b x
| succ n ih =>
rw [pow_succ',mul_apply]
exact ih.trans (JoinRel.step p a b _)
· rintro (hxy|⟨hx,hy⟩)
· exact sameCycle_le_vertexJoin p h hxy
· have hab := sameCycle_swap_of_not_sameCycle p h
rcases hx with hx|hx <;> rcases hy with hy|hy
· exact (sameCycle_le_vertexJoin p h hx).trans (sameCycle_le_vertexJoin p h hy).symm
· exact (sameCycle_le_vertexJoin p h hx).trans (hab.trans (sameCycle_le_vertexJoin p h hy).symm)
· exact (sameCycle_le_vertexJoin p h hx).trans (hab.symm.trans (sameCycle_le_vertexJoin p h hy).symm)
· exact (sameCycle_le_vertexJoin p h hx).trans (sameCycle_le_vertexJoin p h hy).symm
end FKCRT.MapCycles
end
noncomputable section
open Equiv Equiv.Perm
namespace FKCRT.MapCycles
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α]
omit [DecidableEq α] in
lemma sameCycle_partition {p : Perm α} {S : Set α}
(hp : ∀ d,p d∈S ↔ d∈S) {x y : α} (hxy : p.SameCycle x y) : x∈S ↔ y∈S := by
obtain ⟨n,rfl⟩ := hxy.exists_nat_pow_eq
clear hxy
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => simpa only [pow_succ',mul_apply,hp] using ih
omit [DecidableEq α] in
lemma not_sameCycle_partition {p : Perm α} {S : Set α}
(hp : ∀ d,p d∈S ↔ d∈S) {a b : α} (ha : a∈S) (hb : b∉S) : ¬p.SameCycle a b :=
fun h => hb ((sameCycle_partition hp h).mp ha)
/-- The inclusion of either block's vertices remains injective under the
actual vertex-rotation cut/join. -/
theorem vertexJoin_inside_iff {p : Perm α} {S : Set α}
(hp : ∀ d,p d∈S ↔ d∈S) {a b x y : α} (ha : a∈S) (hb : b∉S)
(hx : x∈S) (hy : y∈S) : (swap a b*p).SameCycle x y ↔ p.SameCycle x y := by
rw [sameCycle_vertexJoin_iff p (not_sameCycle_partition hp ha hb)]
constructor
· rintro (h|⟨hxa|hxb,hya|hyb⟩)
· exact h
· exact hxa.trans hya.symm
· exact False.elim (hb ((sameCycle_partition hp hyb).mp hy))
· exact False.elim (hb ((sameCycle_partition hp hxb).mp hx))
· exact False.elim (hb ((sameCycle_partition hp hxb).mp hx))
· exact Or.inl
theorem vertexJoin_outside_iff {p : Perm α} {S : Set α}
(hp : ∀ d,p d∈S ↔ d∈S) {a b x y : α} (ha : a∈S) (hb : b∉S)
(hx : x∉S) (hy : y∉S) : (swap a b*p).SameCycle x y ↔ p.SameCycle x y := by
have hh := vertexJoin_inside_iff (S := Sᶜ) (p := p)
(fun d => not_congr (hp d)) hb (by simpa using ha) hx hy
simpa only [swap_comm b a] using hh
/-- A vertex in one block coincides with a vertex in the other block if
and only if both are their respective attachment poles. -/
theorem vertexJoin_cross_iff {p : Perm α} {S : Set α}
(hp : ∀ d,p d∈S ↔ d∈S) {a b x y : α} (ha : a∈S) (hb : b∉S)
(hx : x∈S) (hy : y∉S) : (swap a b*p).SameCycle x y ↔ p.SameCycle x a ∧ p.SameCycle y b := by
rw [sameCycle_vertexJoin_iff p (not_sameCycle_partition hp ha hb)]
constructor
· rintro (h|⟨hxa|hxb,hya|hyb⟩)
· exact False.elim (hy ((sameCycle_partition hp h).mp hx))
· exact False.elim (hy ((sameCycle_partition hp hya).mpr ha))
· exact ⟨hxa,hyb⟩
· exact False.elim (hb ((sameCycle_partition hp hxb).mp hx))
· exact False.elim (hb ((sameCycle_partition hp hxb).mp hx))
· rintro ⟨hxa,hyb⟩
exact Or.inr ⟨Or.inl hxa,Or.inr hyb⟩
omit [Fintype α] in
lemma formPerm_other_mem_iff {l r : List α} (hd : l.Disjoint r) (x : α) :
r.formPerm x∈l ↔ x∈l := by
by_cases hx : x∈l
· have hxr : x∉r := fun h => List.disjoint_left.mp hd hx h
simp only [List.formPerm_apply_of_notMem hxr]
· constructor
· intro h
have hxr : r.formPerm x∉r := fun hr => List.disjoint_left.mp hd h hr
have he : r.formPerm x=x := List.formPerm_apply_of_notMem
(fun hr => hxr (r.formPerm_apply_mem_of_mem hr))
exact he ▸ h
· exact False.elim ∘ hx
/-- The literal combined contour rotation is a one-vertex join of the
separate rotations. The flip permutation can be the actual first-colour
matching; only its proved locality is required. -/
theorem contour_vertex_join (a b : α) (L R : List α)
(hn : (a::(L++b::R)).Nodup) (e : Perm α)
(he : ∀ x,e x∈a::L ↔ x∈a::L) :
let p := (a::L).formPerm*(b::R).formPerm*e
((a::(L++b::R)).formPerm*e=swap a b*p) ∧
(∀ x y,x∈a::L → y∈a::L →
(((a::(L++b::R)).formPerm*e).SameCycle x y ↔ p.SameCycle x y)) ∧
(∀ x y,x∈a::L → y∉a::L →
(((a::(L++b::R)).formPerm*e).SameCycle x y ↔ p.SameCycle x a ∧ p.SameCycle y b)) := by
dsimp only
have hd : (a::L).Disjoint (b::R) := by
have hn' : ((a::L)++(b::R)).Nodup := by simpa only [List.cons_append] using hn
exact List.disjoint_iff_ne.mpr (List.nodup_append.mp hn').2.2
have hp : ∀ x,((a::L).formPerm*(b::R).formPerm*e) x∈a::L ↔ x∈a::L := by
intro x
simp only [mul_apply,List.formPerm_mem_iff_mem,formPerm_other_mem_iff hd,he]
have hb : b∉a::L := fun h => List.disjoint_left.mp hd h (by simp)
have hj : (a::(L++b::R)).formPerm*e=swap a b*((a::L).formPerm*(b::R).formPerm*e) := by
rw [formPerm_cut a b L R hn]
simp only [mul_assoc]
refine ⟨hj,?_,?_⟩
· intro x y hx hy
rw [hj]
exact vertexJoin_inside_iff (S := {x | x∈a::L}) hp (by simp) hb hx hy
· intro x y hx hy
rw [hj]
exact vertexJoin_cross_iff (S := {x | x∈a::L}) hp (by simp) hb hx hy
end FKCRT.MapCycles
end
end OAI