import OAI.Combinatorics.BinaryEdit.Model import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.EquivFin import Mathlib.Tactic namespace OAI /-! Distortion of finite metric spaces under injective maps into real ℓ₁. -/ noncomputable section open scoped ENNReal namespace TreeEdit.BinaryLower variable {X Y : Type*} /-- The two finite sets whose maxima define distortion. -/ def expansionRatios (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (f : X → RealL1) : Set ℝ := {r | ∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ r = ‖f x - f y‖ / ρ x y} def contractionRatios (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (f : X → RealL1) : Set ℝ := {r | ∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ r = ρ x y / ‖f x - f y‖} def embeddingDistortions (ρ : X → X → ℝ) : Set ℝ := {D | ∃ f : X → RealL1, Function.Injective f ∧ D = distortion ρ f} lemma expansionRatios_finite [Finite X] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (f : X → RealL1) : (expansionRatios ρ f).Finite := by apply Set.Finite.subset (Set.finite_range (fun p : X × X => ‖f p.1 - f p.2‖ / ρ p.1 p.2)) rintro r ⟨x, y, _, rfl⟩ exact ⟨(x, y), rfl⟩ lemma contractionRatios_finite [Finite X] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (f : X → RealL1) : (contractionRatios ρ f).Finite := by apply Set.Finite.subset (Set.finite_range (fun p : X × X => ρ p.1 p.2 / ‖f p.1 - f p.2‖)) rintro r ⟨x, y, _, rfl⟩ exact ⟨(x, y), rfl⟩ lemma expansionRatios_nonempty [Nontrivial X] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (f : X → RealL1) : (expansionRatios ρ f).Nonempty := by obtain ⟨x, y, hxy⟩ := exists_pair_ne X exact ⟨_, x, y, hxy, rfl⟩ lemma contractionRatios_nonempty [Nontrivial X] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (f : X → RealL1) : (contractionRatios ρ f).Nonempty := by obtain ⟨x, y, hxy⟩ := exists_pair_ne X exact ⟨_, x, y, hxy, rfl⟩ lemma expansion_nonneg [Finite X] [Nontrivial X] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (hρ : ∀ x y, 0 ≤ ρ x y) (f : X → RealL1) : 0 ≤ sSup (expansionRatios ρ f) := by obtain ⟨x, y, hxy⟩ := exists_pair_ne X exact (div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (hρ x y)).trans (le_csSup (expansionRatios_finite ρ f).bddAbove ⟨x, y, hxy, rfl⟩) lemma contraction_nonneg [Finite X] [Nontrivial X] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (hρ : ∀ x y, 0 ≤ ρ x y) (f : X → RealL1) : 0 ≤ sSup (contractionRatios ρ f) := by obtain ⟨x, y, hxy⟩ := exists_pair_ne X exact (div_nonneg (hρ x y) (norm_nonneg _)).trans (le_csSup (contractionRatios_finite ρ f).bddAbove ⟨x, y, hxy, rfl⟩) lemma distortion_nonneg [Finite X] [Nontrivial X] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (hρ : ∀ x y, 0 ≤ ρ x y) (f : X → RealL1) : 0 ≤ distortion ρ f := mul_nonneg (expansion_nonneg ρ hρ f) (contraction_nonneg ρ hρ f) /-- Every finite set admits an injection into the full sequence space. -/ lemma exists_injective_L1 (X : Type*) [Finite X] : ∃ f : X → RealL1, Function.Injective f := by classical let := Fintype.ofFinite X let f : X → RealL1 := fun x => lp.single 1 0 ((Fintype.equivFin X x).val : ℝ) refine ⟨f, ?_⟩ intro x y h have hv := congrArg (fun z : RealL1 => z 0) h simp only [f, lp.single_apply_self] at hv apply (Fintype.equivFin X).injective apply Fin.ext exact_mod_cast hv lemma embeddingDistortions_nonempty [Finite X] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) : (embeddingDistortions ρ).Nonempty := by obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := exists_injective_L1 X exact ⟨distortion ρ f, f, hf, rfl⟩ lemma embeddingDistortions_bddBelow [Finite X] [Nontrivial X] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (hρ : ∀ x y, 0 ≤ ρ x y) : BddBelow (embeddingDistortions ρ) := by refine ⟨0, ?_⟩ rintro D ⟨f, _, rfl⟩ exact distortion_nonneg ρ hρ f lemma c1_nonneg [Finite X] [Nontrivial X] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (hρ : ∀ x y, 0 ≤ ρ x y) : 0 ≤ c1 X ρ := by apply le_csInf (embeddingDistortions_nonempty ρ) rintro D ⟨f, _, rfl⟩ exact distortion_nonneg ρ hρ f lemma c1_le_distortion [Finite X] [Nontrivial X] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (hρ : ∀ x y, 0 ≤ ρ x y) (f : X → RealL1) (hf : Function.Injective f) : c1 X ρ ≤ distortion ρ f := by exact csInf_le (embeddingDistortions_bddBelow ρ hρ) ⟨f, hf, rfl⟩ lemma le_c1 [Finite X] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (D : ℝ) (h : ∀ f : X → RealL1, Function.Injective f → D ≤ distortion ρ f) : D ≤ c1 X ρ := by apply le_csInf (embeddingDistortions_nonempty ρ) rintro e ⟨f, hf, rfl⟩ exact h f hf lemma expansionRatios_comp_subset (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (σ : Y → Y → ℝ) (g : X → Y) (hg : Function.Injective g) (hiso : ∀ x y, σ (g x) (g y) = ρ x y) (f : Y → RealL1) : expansionRatios ρ (f ∘ g) ⊆ expansionRatios σ f := by rintro r ⟨x, y, hxy, rfl⟩ exact ⟨g x, g y, fun h => hxy (hg h), by simp [hiso]⟩ lemma contractionRatios_comp_subset (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (σ : Y → Y → ℝ) (g : X → Y) (hg : Function.Injective g) (hiso : ∀ x y, σ (g x) (g y) = ρ x y) (f : Y → RealL1) : contractionRatios ρ (f ∘ g) ⊆ contractionRatios σ f := by rintro r ⟨x, y, hxy, rfl⟩ exact ⟨g x, g y, fun h => hxy (hg h), by simp [hiso]⟩ /-- Restriction to an isometric subspace cannot increase distortion. -/ lemma distortion_comp_le [Finite X] [Nontrivial X] [Finite Y] [Nontrivial Y] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (σ : Y → Y → ℝ) (hσ : ∀ x y, 0 ≤ σ x y) (g : X → Y) (hg : Function.Injective g) (hiso : ∀ x y, σ (g x) (g y) = ρ x y) (f : Y → RealL1) : distortion ρ (f ∘ g) ≤ distortion σ f := by have hρ : ∀ x y, 0 ≤ ρ x y := fun x y => (hiso x y) ▸ hσ (g x) (g y) apply mul_le_mul · apply csSup_le (expansionRatios_nonempty ρ (f ∘ g)) intro r hr exact le_csSup (expansionRatios_finite σ f).bddAbove (expansionRatios_comp_subset ρ σ g hg hiso f hr) · apply csSup_le (contractionRatios_nonempty ρ (f ∘ g)) intro r hr exact le_csSup (contractionRatios_finite σ f).bddAbove (contractionRatios_comp_subset ρ σ g hg hiso f hr) · exact contraction_nonneg ρ hρ (f ∘ g) · exact expansion_nonneg σ hσ f /-- The optimal ℓ₁ distortion is monotone under injective isometries. -/ lemma c1_mono_isometry [Finite X] [Nontrivial X] [Finite Y] [Nontrivial Y] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (σ : Y → Y → ℝ) (hσ : ∀ x y, 0 ≤ σ x y) (g : X → Y) (hg : Function.Injective g) (hiso : ∀ x y, σ (g x) (g y) = ρ x y) : c1 X ρ ≤ c1 Y σ := by have hρ : ∀ x y, 0 ≤ ρ x y := fun x y => (hiso x y) ▸ hσ (g x) (g y) apply le_c1 intro f hf exact (c1_le_distortion ρ hρ (f ∘ g) (hf.comp hg)).trans (distortion_comp_le ρ σ hσ g hg hiso f) lemma c1_eq_of_equiv [Finite X] [Nontrivial X] [Finite Y] [Nontrivial Y] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (σ : Y → Y → ℝ) (hσ : ∀ x y, 0 ≤ σ x y) (e : X ≃ Y) (hiso : ∀ x y, σ (e x) (e y) = ρ x y) : c1 X ρ = c1 Y σ := by apply le_antisymm (c1_mono_isometry ρ σ hσ e e.injective hiso) apply c1_mono_isometry σ ρ · intro x y exact (hiso x y) ▸ hσ (e x) (e y) · exact e.symm.injective · intro x y simpa using (hiso (e.symm x) (e.symm y)).symm /-- A noncontracting embedding with expansion at most `D` gives the usual upper bound on optimal distortion. No existence theorem is assumed here. -/ lemma c1_le_of_bounds [Finite X] [Nontrivial X] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (hρ : ∀ x y, 0 ≤ ρ x y) (hpos : ∀ x y, x ≠ y → 0 < ρ x y) (f : X → RealL1) (D : ℝ) (hD : 0 ≤ D) (hlower : ∀ x y, ρ x y ≤ ‖f x - f y‖) (hupper : ∀ x y, ‖f x - f y‖ ≤ D * ρ x y) : c1 X ρ ≤ D := by have hf : Function.Injective f := by intro x y h by_contra hxy have ht := hlower x y rw [h, sub_self, norm_zero] at ht exact (not_le_of_gt (hpos x y hxy)) ht apply (c1_le_distortion ρ hρ f hf).trans have he : sSup (expansionRatios ρ f) ≤ D := by apply csSup_le (expansionRatios_nonempty ρ f) rintro r ⟨x, y, hxy, rfl⟩ exact (div_le_iff₀ (hpos x y hxy)).2 (hupper x y) have hc : sSup (contractionRatios ρ f) ≤ 1 := by apply csSup_le (contractionRatios_nonempty ρ f) rintro r ⟨x, y, hxy, rfl⟩ have hn : 0 < ‖f x - f y‖ := (hpos x y hxy).trans_le (hlower x y) exact (div_le_iff₀ hn).2 (by simpa using hlower x y) calc distortion ρ f ≤ D * 1 := mul_le_mul he hc (contraction_nonneg ρ hρ f) hD _ = D := mul_one D /-- Comparing two metrics through a scaled bi-Lipschitz injection costs only its ratio of expansion to contraction in the distortion product. -/ lemma distortion_comp_le_bilip [Finite X] [Nontrivial X] [Finite Y] [Nontrivial Y] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (σ : Y → Y → ℝ) (hρ : ∀ x y, 0 ≤ ρ x y) (hσ : ∀ x y, 0 ≤ σ x y) (hpos : ∀ x y, x ≠ y → 0 < ρ x y) (g : X → Y) (hg : Function.Injective g) (a b : ℝ) (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) (hlower : ∀ x y, a * ρ x y ≤ σ (g x) (g y)) (hupper : ∀ x y, σ (g x) (g y) ≤ b * ρ x y) (f : Y → RealL1) : distortion ρ (f ∘ g) ≤ (b / a) * distortion σ f := by have he : sSup (expansionRatios ρ (f ∘ g)) ≤ b * sSup (expansionRatios σ f) := by apply csSup_le (expansionRatios_nonempty ρ (f ∘ g)) rintro r ⟨x, y, hxy, rfl⟩ have ht := hpos x y hxy have hs : 0 < σ (g x) (g y) := (mul_pos ha ht).trans_le (hlower x y) have hratio : ‖f (g x) - f (g y)‖ / σ (g x) (g y) ≤ sSup (expansionRatios σ f) := le_csSup (expansionRatios_finite σ f).bddAbove ⟨g x, g y, fun h => hxy (hg h), rfl⟩ calc ‖(f ∘ g) x - (f ∘ g) y‖ / ρ x y ≤ (b * ‖f (g x) - f (g y)‖) / σ (g x) (g y) := by apply (div_le_div_iff₀ ht hs).2 have hn := norm_nonneg (f (g x) - f (g y)) change ‖f (g x) - f (g y)‖ * σ (g x) (g y) ≤ b * ‖f (g x) - f (g y)‖ * ρ x y nlinarith [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hupper x y) hn] _ = b * (‖f (g x) - f (g y)‖ / σ (g x) (g y)) := by ring _ ≤ b * sSup (expansionRatios σ f) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hratio hb have hc : sSup (contractionRatios ρ (f ∘ g)) ≤ (1 / a) * sSup (contractionRatios σ f) := by apply csSup_le (contractionRatios_nonempty ρ (f ∘ g)) rintro r ⟨x, y, hxy, rfl⟩ have hratio : σ (g x) (g y) / ‖f (g x) - f (g y)‖ ≤ sSup (contractionRatios σ f) := le_csSup (contractionRatios_finite σ f).bddAbove ⟨g x, g y, fun h => hxy (hg h), rfl⟩ have hmetric : ρ x y ≤ σ (g x) (g y) / a := by apply (le_div_iff₀ ha).2 simpa [mul_comm] using hlower x y calc ρ x y / ‖(f ∘ g) x - (f ∘ g) y‖ ≤ (σ (g x) (g y) / a) / ‖f (g x) - f (g y)‖ := div_le_div_of_nonneg_right hmetric (norm_nonneg _) _ = (1 / a) * (σ (g x) (g y) / ‖f (g x) - f (g y)‖) := by ring _ ≤ (1 / a) * sSup (contractionRatios σ f) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hratio (by positivity) calc distortion ρ (f ∘ g) ≤ (b * sSup (expansionRatios σ f)) * ((1 / a) * sSup (contractionRatios σ f)) := mul_le_mul he hc (contraction_nonneg ρ hρ (f ∘ g)) (mul_nonneg hb (expansion_nonneg σ hσ f)) _ = (b / a) * distortion σ f := by unfold distortion; unfold expansionRatios contractionRatios; ring /-- Optimal distortion transfer through any scaled bi-Lipschitz injection. In particular, `a=P/804` and `b=P` give constant distortion loss. -/ lemma c1_le_bilip_mul [Finite X] [Nontrivial X] [Finite Y] [Nontrivial Y] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (σ : Y → Y → ℝ) (hρ : ∀ x y, 0 ≤ ρ x y) (hσ : ∀ x y, 0 ≤ σ x y) (hpos : ∀ x y, x ≠ y → 0 < ρ x y) (g : X → Y) (hg : Function.Injective g) (a b : ℝ) (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hlower : ∀ x y, a * ρ x y ≤ σ (g x) (g y)) (hupper : ∀ x y, σ (g x) (g y) ≤ b * ρ x y) : c1 X ρ ≤ (b / a) * c1 Y σ := by have hba : 0 < b / a := div_pos hb ha have h : c1 X ρ / (b / a) ≤ c1 Y σ := by apply le_c1 intro f hf apply (div_le_iff₀ hba).2 calc c1 X ρ ≤ distortion ρ (f ∘ g) := c1_le_distortion ρ hρ (f ∘ g) (hf.comp hg) _ ≤ (b / a) * distortion σ f := distortion_comp_le_bilip ρ σ hρ hσ hpos g hg a b ha hb.le hlower hupper f _ = distortion σ f * (b / a) := mul_comm _ _ simpa [mul_comm] using (div_le_iff₀ hba).1 h /-- Rescaling by the maximal contraction ratio makes an injective embedding noncontracting without changing the distortion bound. -/ lemma exists_normalized_embedding [Finite X] [Nontrivial X] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (hρ : ∀ x y, 0 ≤ ρ x y) (hdiag : ∀ x, ρ x x = 0) (hpos : ∀ x y, x ≠ y → 0 < ρ x y) (f : X → RealL1) (hf : Function.Injective f) : ∃ g : X → RealL1, Function.Injective g ∧ ∀ x y, ρ x y ≤ ‖g x - g y‖ ∧ ‖g x - g y‖ ≤ distortion ρ f * ρ x y := by let C := sSup (contractionRatios ρ f) let E := sSup (expansionRatios ρ f) have hC : 0 ≤ C := contraction_nonneg ρ hρ f let g : X → RealL1 := fun x => C • f x have hnorm (x y : X) : ‖g x - g y‖ = C * ‖f x - f y‖ := by dsimp [g] rw [← smul_sub, norm_smul, Real.norm_of_nonneg hC] have hbounds : ∀ x y, ρ x y ≤ ‖g x - g y‖ ∧ ‖g x - g y‖ ≤ distortion ρ f * ρ x y := by intro x y by_cases hxy : x = y · subst y simp [hdiag] have hr : 0 < ρ x y := hpos x y hxy have hn : 0 < ‖f x - f y‖ := norm_pos_iff.mpr (sub_ne_zero.mpr (fun h => hxy (hf h))) have hc : ρ x y / ‖f x - f y‖ ≤ C := le_csSup (contractionRatios_finite ρ f).bddAbove ⟨x, y, hxy, rfl⟩ have he : ‖f x - f y‖ / ρ x y ≤ E := le_csSup (expansionRatios_finite ρ f).bddAbove ⟨x, y, hxy, rfl⟩ constructor · rw [hnorm] exact (div_le_iff₀ hn).1 hc · rw [hnorm] have ht := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ((div_le_iff₀ hr).1 he) hC change C * ‖f x - f y‖ ≤ (E * C) * ρ x y nlinarith refine ⟨g, ?_, hbounds⟩ intro x y h by_contra hxy have ht := (hbounds x y).1 rw [h, sub_self, norm_zero] at ht exact (not_le_of_gt (hpos x y hxy)) ht /-- An obstruction proved for all normalized embeddings gives a lower bound on the infimum defining `c1`. This is the passage used by the two tree routes. -/ lemma le_c1_of_normalized [Finite X] [Nontrivial X] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (hρ : ∀ x y, 0 ≤ ρ x y) (hdiag : ∀ x, ρ x x = 0) (hpos : ∀ x y, x ≠ y → 0 < ρ x y) (D : ℝ) (hobstruction : ∀ (g : X → RealL1) (A : ℝ), (∀ x y, ρ x y ≤ ‖g x - g y‖ ∧ ‖g x - g y‖ ≤ A * ρ x y) → D ≤ A) : D ≤ c1 X ρ := by apply le_c1 intro f hf obtain ⟨g, _, hg⟩ := exists_normalized_embedding ρ hρ hdiag hpos f hf exact hobstruction g (distortion ρ f) hg /-- The dual normalization used verbatim by the finite-tree obstruction: the image distance lies between `ρ / distortion` and `ρ`. -/ lemma exists_nonexpanding_embedding [Finite X] [Nontrivial X] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (hρ : ∀ x y, 0 ≤ ρ x y) (hdiag : ∀ x, ρ x x = 0) (hpos : ∀ x y, x ≠ y → 0 < ρ x y) (f : X → RealL1) (hf : Function.Injective f) : 0 < distortion ρ f ∧ ∃ g : X → RealL1, Function.Injective g ∧ ∀ x y, ρ x y / distortion ρ f ≤ ‖g x - g y‖ ∧ ‖g x - g y‖ ≤ ρ x y := by obtain ⟨g, _, hg⟩ := exists_normalized_embedding ρ hρ hdiag hpos f hf obtain ⟨x₀, y₀, hxy⟩ := exists_pair_ne X have hr := hpos x₀ y₀ hxy have hD : 0 < distortion ρ f := by have ht := (hg x₀ y₀).1.trans (hg x₀ y₀).2 nlinarith let g' : X → RealL1 := fun x => (1 / distortion ρ f) • g x have hnorm (x y : X) : ‖g' x - g' y‖ = ‖g x - g y‖ / distortion ρ f := by dsimp [g'] rw [← smul_sub, norm_smul, Real.norm_of_nonneg (by positivity)] ring have hb : ∀ x y, ρ x y / distortion ρ f ≤ ‖g' x - g' y‖ ∧ ‖g' x - g' y‖ ≤ ρ x y := by intro x y rw [hnorm] constructor · exact div_le_div_of_nonneg_right (hg x y).1 hD.le · apply (div_le_iff₀ hD).2 simpa [mul_comm] using (hg x y).2 refine ⟨hD, g', ?_, hb⟩ intro x y h by_contra hxy have ht := (hb x y).1 rw [h, sub_self, norm_zero] at ht exact (not_le_of_gt (div_pos (hpos x y hxy) hD)) ht lemma le_c1_of_nonexpanding [Finite X] [Nontrivial X] (ρ : X → X → ℝ) (hρ : ∀ x y, 0 ≤ ρ x y) (hdiag : ∀ x, ρ x x = 0) (hpos : ∀ x y, x ≠ y → 0 < ρ x y) (D : ℝ) (hobstruction : ∀ (g : X → RealL1) (A : ℝ), 0 < A → (∀ x y, ρ x y / A ≤ ‖g x - g y‖ ∧ ‖g x - g y‖ ≤ ρ x y) → D ≤ A) : D ≤ c1 X ρ := by apply le_c1 intro f hf obtain ⟨hD, g, _, hg⟩ := exists_nonexpanding_embedding ρ hρ hdiag hpos f hf exact hobstruction g (distortion ρ f) hD hg end TreeEdit.BinaryLower end end OAI