import OAI.Combinatorics.HadwigerCounterexample.FiniteOptionLabels namespace OAI /-! # Binary Status Comparison -/ noncomputable section namespace HadwigerCounterexample open Finset Matrix Filter Function Submodule Module LinearMap open scoped BigOperators variable {A B J H : Type} [Fintype A] [Fintype B] [Fintype J] theorem disagreement_bound (w : Wgt A) (hw : ∀ x,0 ≤ w x) (f g h:A→ H) : pr w (fun i=> f i≠ h i) ≤ pr w (fun i=>f i≠ g i) + pr w (fun i=>g i≠h i) := let p (i:A) := f i≠g i∨g i≠h i ((pr_mono hw fun i h=>show p i from Classical.byContradiction (fun hi => h (Eq.trans (not_not.mp (mt Or.inl hi)) (not_not.mp (mt Or.inr hi))))).trans (pr_or_le hw)) def majority (w : Wgt A) (f : A→F) := if 1/2≤ pr w (fun i=>f i=0) then (0:F) else 1 theorem majority_bound (w : Wgt A) (hw:IsLaw w) (f : A→F) : 1/2 ≤ pr w (fun i=> f i= majority w f) := by classical unfold majority split next h => exact h next h => have hi i : f i=1 ↔ ¬f i=0 := ⟨fun hh=>by rw [hh]; exact one_ne_zero,fun hh=>(bit_cases _).resolve_left hh⟩ simp_rw [hi,pr_not,hw.total] exact le_of_lt (by linarith only [h]) theorem majority_charge (p:Wgt A) (q:Wgt B) (hp:IsLaw p) (hq:IsLaw q) (f:A→F) (g:B→F) : pr p (fun i=> f i≠majority q g)≤2 * pr (pairW p q) (fun i=> f i.1≠g i.2) := by classical let Q i:= g i=majority q g; let P i:= f i≠majority q g let v:= pairW p q have hm (z:A×B) (h:P z.1∧Q z.2): f z.1≠g z.2 := h.2 ▸ h.1 have hh : pr p P*pr q Q ≤ pr v (fun i=>f i.1≠g i.2) := (pairW_pr ..).symm.le.trans (pr_mono (pairW_law hp hq).nz hm) have hx:=majority_bound q hq g have hh' := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hx (pr_nonneg (p:=P) hp.nz) change _* (1/2) ≤ _*pr q Q at hh' change pr p P≤2*pr v _ linarith only [hh,hh'] theorem reflect_cost (p:Wgt A) (q:Wgt B) (hp:IsLaw p) (hq:IsLaw q) (f:A→H) (g:B→H) (k:H) : pr q (fun i=>g i≠k)≤ pr (pairW p q) (fun i=>f i.1≠g i.2)+pr p (fun i=>f i≠k) := by let w:=pairW p q let t i:= g i≠k; let s i:= f i≠k have hi : pr q t=pr w (fun i=> t i.2) := by simpa [hp.total] using (pairW_pr p q (fun _=>True) t).symm have hj : pr p s=pr w (fun i=>s i.1) := by simpa [hq.total] using (pairW_pr p q s (fun _=>True)).symm let P (i:A×B):= f i.1 ≠ g i.2 rw [hi,hj] have hh (i:A×B) (h:t i.2): P i∨ s i.1 := by by_cases he:P i · exact Or.inl he exact Or.inr (fun hc=> h ((not_not.mp he).symm.trans hc)) exact (pr_mono (pairW_law hp hq).nz hh).trans (pr_or_le (pairW_law hp hq).nz) namespace StatusAnalysis namespace DualAnalysis variable {p:Shape} {d e: Rates} {r K:ℕ} abbrev Pulsar (p:Shape) (r:ℕ):= Tag p.g → F → Fin r→F variable (u:Terrain p r) (s:Gazette p r d) (t:Gazette p r e) def shot (i:Nodes) (x:Appearance p) (a:RhymeSet (d i)) (f:Pulsar p r) := avg (u x.l x.q) (fun j=>pr (s i x j) (fun v=> a.soot x v ≠f x.l x.q j)) def praise (u:Terrain p r) (s:Gazette p r d) (i:Nodes) (A:Finset (Label p.b)) (a:RhymeSet (d i)) (f:Pulsar p r) (ε:ℝ) := ∀ x:Appearance p,x.s∉A →x.apt → shot u s i x a f≤ε def counsel (i:Grid) (A B:Finset (Label p.b)) (a : RhymeSet (d i.1)) (b : RhymeSet (e i.2)) (ε :ℝ) := ∀ x:Zodiac p,x.common → x.s true∉A →x.s false∉ B →charge u x s t i a b≤ε def amazes (p:Shape) (z:Label p.b) (l: Tag p.g) (q:F):Appearance p:=⟨l,z,Flavor.full,q⟩ def amends (p:Shape) (x y:Appearance p): Zodiac p := {l:=x.l q:=x.q s i:=if i then x.s else y.s f i:=if i then x.f else y.f} theorem amendsB (x y: Appearance p)(h:x.l=y.l)(ht:x.q=y.q): (amends p x y).aspect false=y := by cases x; cases y; simp_all [amends,Zodiac.aspect] theorem splitCounsel (i:Grid) (A B:Finset (Label p.b)) (a : RhymeSet (d i.1)) (b : RhymeSet (e i.2)) (ε :ℝ) (h:counsel u s t i A B a b ε) (x y:Appearance p) (hx:x.s∉A) (hy:y.s∉B) (he:x.apt) (hf:y.apt) (hg:x.l=y.l) (hk:x.q=y.q) : avg (u x.l x.q) (fun j=>pr (pairW (s i.1 x j) (t i.2 y j)) (fun k=>a.soot x k.1 ≠ b.soot y k.2))≤ε := by classical let Z:=amends p x y have hQ : Z.aspect false=y := amendsB _ _ hg hk have hP : Z.aspect true=x := rfl have hm : Z.common := by intro i;cases i; rw [hQ];exact hf; rw [hP];exact he have hi:= h Z hm hx hy unfold charge circlet pr couplePage at hi rw [mixW_avg,hQ,hP] at hi exact hi set_option maxHeartbeats 800000 in theorem paeans {β δ:ℝ} (hu:origami p r u δ)(hs:reports p r u s β δ)(ht:reports p r u t β δ) (i:Grid) (A B:Finset (Label p.b)) (hx:A.card majority_charge (s i.1 z j) (t i.2 w j) (hs.law _ _ hhq _) (ht.law _ _ ht' _) (a.soot z) (b.soot w))) ?_ rw [avg_mul'] exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hh (by norm_num) refine ⟨f,fun w hw hx=>(hl _ hw hx).trans (by linarith only [he]), fun w hw hv=>?_⟩ let z:=amazes p x w.l w.q have hf : z.apt:=generic_apt _ hg _ rfl have hx0:= splitCounsel u s t i A B a b ε h z w hx hw hf hv rfl rfl have hl0:=hl z hx hf let W:=u w.l w.q have heq j:= reflect_cost (s i.1 z j) (t i.2 w j) (hs.law _ _ hf j) (ht.law _ _ hv j) (a.soot z) (b.soot w) (f w.l w.q j) apply (avg_mono (hu.1 w.l w.q).nz heq).trans rw [avg_add]; exact (add_le_add hx0 hl0).trans_eq (by ring) end DualAnalysis end StatusAnalysis end HadwigerCounterexample end end OAI