import Mathlib import OAI.Combinatorics.MatchingCount.Graphs.SumLiftMate namespace OAI namespace MatchingFPRAS.Subdivision open Finset lemma valid_step_eq_iff {m : ℕ} {U : Finset (Fin m)} {b c : Selection m} (hb : Valid U b) (hc : Valid U c) (i : Fin m) : b i.castSucc = c i.castSucc ↔ b i.succ = c i.succ := by by_cases hi : i ∈ U · have hb' := hb i have hc' := hc i simp only [hi, ↓reduceIte] at hb' hc' simp [hb'.1,hb'.2,hc'.1,hc'.2] · have hb' : b i.succ = !(b i.castSucc) := by apply (bool_ne_iff_eq_not _ _).mp simpa only [hi, ↓reduceIte] using hb i have hc' : c i.succ = !(c i.castSucc) := by apply (bool_ne_iff_eq_not _ _).mp simpa only [hi, ↓reduceIte] using hc i rw [hb',hc'] simp lemma valid_eq_iff_zero {m : ℕ} {U : Finset (Fin m)} {b c : Selection m} (hb : Valid U b) (hc : Valid U c) (i : Fin (m+1)) : b i = c i ↔ b 0 = c 0 := by have aux (k : ℕ) (hk : k < m+1) : b ⟨k,hk⟩ = c ⟨k,hk⟩ ↔ b 0 = c 0 := by induction k with | zero => rfl | succ k ih => have hk' : k < m := by omega exact ((valid_step_eq_iff hb hc ⟨k,hk'⟩).symm).trans (ih (by omega)) exact aux i.val i.isLt theorem broken_unique {m : ℕ} {U : Finset (Fin m)} (hU : U.Nonempty) {b c : Selection m} (hb : Valid U b) (hc : Valid U c) : b = c := by obtain ⟨j,hj⟩ := hU have hb' := hb j have hc' := hc j simp only [hj, ↓reduceIte] at hb' hc' have hzero := (valid_eq_iff_zero hb hc j.castSucc).mp (hb'.1.trans hc'.1.symm) funext i exact (valid_eq_iff_zero hb hc i).mpr hzero noncomputable def profile (p : ℕ) (B Hu Hv lam : ℝ) : List ℝ := duplicate (List.ofFn fun r : Fin p => max B (Hu / 2^r.val)) ++ [lam] ++ duplicate ((List.ofFn fun r : Fin p => max B (Hv / 2^r.val)).reverse) @[simp] theorem profile_length (p : ℕ) (B Hu Hv lam : ℝ) : (profile p B Hu Hv lam).length = 4*p+1 := by simp [profile]; omega noncomputable def profileActivity (p : ℕ) (B Hu Hv lam : ℝ) (i : Fin (4*p+1)) : ℝ := (profile p B Hu Hv lam).get (i.cast (profile_length p B Hu Hv lam).symm) theorem profileActivity_ofFn (p : ℕ) (B Hu Hv lam : ℝ) : List.ofFn (profileActivity p B Hu Hv lam) = profile p B Hu Hv lam := by apply List.ext_getElem · simp · intro i hi hj simp only [List.getElem_ofFn, profileActivity, List.get_eq_getElem, Fin.val_cast] theorem exact_profile_weight (p : ℕ) (B Hu Hv lam : ℝ) (a : Bool) : selectedWeight (profileActivity p B Hu Hv lam) (fun i => alternating a i.val) = ((∏ r : Fin p, max B (Hu / 2^r.val)) * (∏ r : Fin p, max B (Hv / 2^r.val))) * (if a then lam else 1) := by rw [intact_weight _ _ (alternating_valid _ _),profileActivity_ofFn] simpa [profile,List.prod_ofFn] using profile_weight a (List.ofFn fun r : Fin p => max B (Hu / 2^r.val)) ((List.ofFn fun r : Fin p => max B (Hv / 2^r.val)).reverse) lam section Deletion variable {V E : Type*} [Fintype V] [Fintype E] def Uses {m : ℕ} (u v : E → V) (b : E → Selection m) (e : E) (x : V) : Prop := (b e 0 = true ∧ u e = x) ∨ (b e (Fin.last m) = true ∧ v e = x) def FamilyHoles (u v : E → V) (m : ℕ) (R₀ : Finset V) (U : E → Finset (Fin m)) (b : E → Selection m) : Prop := (∀ e, Valid (U e) (b e)) ∧ (∀ x ∈ R₀, ∀ e, ¬ Uses u v b e x) ∧ (∀ x ∉ R₀, ∃! e, Uses u v b e x) noncomputable def broken {m : ℕ} (U : E → Finset (Fin m)) : Finset E := by classical exact Finset.univ.filter fun e => (U e).Nonempty @[simp] lemma mem_broken {m : ℕ} (U : E → Finset (Fin m)) (e : E) : e ∈ broken U ↔ (U e).Nonempty := by classical simp [broken] noncomputable def residualHoles {m : ℕ} (u v : E → V) (R₀ : Finset V) (U : E → Finset (Fin m)) (b : E → Selection m) : Finset V := by classical exact R₀ ∪ Finset.univ.filter (fun x => ∃ e ∈ broken U, Uses u v b e x) @[simp] lemma mem_residualHoles {m : ℕ} (u v : E → V) (R₀ : Finset V) (U : E → Finset (Fin m)) (b : E → Selection m) (x : V) : x ∈ residualHoles u v R₀ U b ↔ x ∈ R₀ ∨ ∃ e ∈ broken U, Uses u v b e x := by classical simp [residualHoles] theorem residualHoles_independent {m : ℕ} (u v : E → V) (R₀ : Finset V) (U : E → Finset (Fin m)) {b c : E → Selection m} (hb : FamilyHoles u v m R₀ U b) (hc : FamilyHoles u v m R₀ U c) : residualHoles u v R₀ U b = residualHoles u v R₀ U c := by classical have he (e) (h : e ∈ broken U) : b e = c e := broken_unique ((mem_broken U e).mp h) (hb.1 e) (hc.1 e) ext x simp only [mem_residualHoles] apply or_congr Iff.rfl apply exists_congr intro e constructor <;> rintro ⟨h,hx⟩ <;> refine ⟨h,?_⟩ · simpa only [Uses,he e h] using hx · simpa only [Uses,he e h] using hx def LogicalHoles (u v : E → V) (R : Finset V) (forbidden : Finset E) (s : E → Bool) : Prop := (∀ e ∈ forbidden, s e = false) ∧ (∀ x ∈ R, ∀ e, ¬ (s e = true ∧ (u e = x ∨ v e = x))) ∧ (∀ x ∉ R, ∃! e, s e = true ∧ (u e = x ∨ v e = x)) noncomputable def extract {m : ℕ} (U : E → Finset (Fin m)) (b : E → Selection m) (e : E) : Bool := if (U e).Nonempty then false else b e 0 omit [Fintype V] [Fintype E] in lemma intact_uses {m : ℕ} (hm : Even m) (u v : E → V) (b : E → Selection m) (e : E) (x : V) (hb : Valid ∅ (b e)) : Uses u v b e x ↔ b e 0 = true ∧ (u e = x ∨ v e = x) := by rw [Uses,intact_terminals hm _ hb] exact and_or_left.symm theorem extract_legal {m : ℕ} (hm : Even m) (u v : E → V) (R₀ : Finset V) (U : E → Finset (Fin m)) (b : E → Selection m) (hb : FamilyHoles u v m R₀ U b) : LogicalHoles u v (residualHoles u v R₀ U b) (broken U) (extract U b) := by classical have he (e x) : extract U b e = true ∧ (u e = x ∨ v e = x) ↔ e ∉ broken U ∧ Uses u v b e x := by by_cases h : (U e).Nonempty · simp [extract,h] · have hu : U e = ∅ := Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.mp h simp only [extract,h,↓reduceIte,mem_broken,not_false_eq_true,true_and] exact (intact_uses hm u v b e x (by simpa [hu] using hb.1 e)).symm refine ⟨?_,?_,?_⟩ · intro e he' simp [extract,(mem_broken U e).mp he'] · intro x hx e hxe rw [he] at hxe rcases (mem_residualHoles u v R₀ U b x).mp hx with hx | ⟨f,hf,hfx⟩ · exact hb.2.1 x hx e hxe.2 · have hx0 : x ∉ R₀ := by intro hx0; exact hb.2.1 x hx0 f hfx obtain ⟨a,ha,hu⟩ := hb.2.2 x hx0 have hef : e = f := (hu e hxe.2).trans (hu f hfx).symm exact hxe.1 (hef.symm ▸ hf) · intro x hx have hx0 : x ∉ R₀ := by intro h; exact hx ((mem_residualHoles _ _ _ _ _ _).mpr (Or.inl h)) obtain ⟨e,he',hu⟩ := hb.2.2 x hx0 have hn : e ∉ broken U := by intro h exact hx ((mem_residualHoles _ _ _ _ _ _).mpr (Or.inr ⟨e,h,he'⟩)) refine ⟨e,(he e x).mpr ⟨hn,he'⟩,?_⟩ intro f hf exact hu f ((he f x).mp hf).2 noncomputable def rebuild {m : ℕ} (U : E → Finset (Fin m)) (base : E → Selection m) (s : E → Bool) (e : E) : Selection m := if (U e).Nonempty then base e else fun i => alternating (s e) i.val omit [Fintype V] in lemma rebuild_uses {m : ℕ} (hm : Even m) (u v : E → V) (U : E → Finset (Fin m)) (base : E → Selection m) (s : E → Bool) (e : E) (x : V) : Uses u v (rebuild U base s) e x ↔ (e ∈ broken U ∧ Uses u v base e x) ∨ (e ∉ broken U ∧ s e = true ∧ (u e = x ∨ v e = x)) := by classical by_cases h : (U e).Nonempty · simp [rebuild,h,Uses] · simp [rebuild,h,Uses,alternating,Nat.even_iff.mp hm,and_or_left] theorem rebuild_legal {m : ℕ} (hm : Even m) (u v : E → V) (R₀ : Finset V) (U : E → Finset (Fin m)) (base : E → Selection m) (hb : FamilyHoles u v m R₀ U base) (s : E → Bool) (hs : LogicalHoles u v (residualHoles u v R₀ U base) (broken U) s) : FamilyHoles u v m R₀ U (rebuild U base s) := by classical let R := residualHoles u v R₀ U base have hu (e x) := rebuild_uses hm u v U base s e x refine ⟨?_,?_,?_⟩ · intro e by_cases he : (U e).Nonempty · simpa [rebuild,he] using hb.1 e · have he' : U e = ∅ := Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.mp he simpa [rebuild,he,he'] using alternating_valid m (s e) · intro x hx e he have hxR : x ∈ R := (mem_residualHoles _ _ _ _ _ _).mpr (Or.inl hx) rcases (hu e x).mp he with ⟨_,he⟩ | ⟨_,he⟩ · exact hb.2.1 x hx e he · exact hs.2.1 x hxR e he · intro x hx by_cases hxR : x ∈ R · obtain hx0 | ⟨e,he,hxe⟩ := (mem_residualHoles _ _ _ _ _ _).mp hxR · exact (hx hx0).elim obtain ⟨a,ha,hauniq⟩ := hb.2.2 x hx refine ⟨e,(hu e x).mpr (Or.inl ⟨he,hxe⟩),?_⟩ intro f hf rcases (hu f x).mp hf with ⟨_,hf⟩ | ⟨_,hf⟩ · exact (hauniq f hf).trans (hauniq e hxe).symm · exact (hs.2.1 x hxR f hf).elim · obtain ⟨e,he,heuniq⟩ := hs.2.2 x hxR have hen : e ∉ broken U := by intro he' have := hs.1 e he' simp [this] at he refine ⟨e,(hu e x).mpr (Or.inr ⟨hen,he⟩),?_⟩ intro f hf rcases (hu f x).mp hf with ⟨hfb,hf⟩ | ⟨_,hf⟩ · exact (hxR ((mem_residualHoles _ _ _ _ _ _).mpr (Or.inr ⟨f,hfb,hf⟩))).elim · exact heuniq f hf omit [Fintype V] [Fintype E] in theorem rebuild_extract [Fintype V] [Fintype E] {m : ℕ} (u v : E → V) (R₀ : Finset V) (U : E → Finset (Fin m)) (base b : E → Selection m) (hb0 : FamilyHoles u v m R₀ U base) (hb : FamilyHoles u v m R₀ U b) : rebuild U base (extract U b) = b := by classical funext e i by_cases he : (U e).Nonempty · have hbe := broken_unique he (hb0.1 e) (hb.1 e) simp [rebuild,he,hbe] · have he' : U e = ∅ := Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.mp he have hl := (intact_iff (b e)).mp (by simpa [he'] using hb.1 e) i simpa [rebuild,extract,he] using hl.symm omit [Fintype V] [Fintype E] in theorem extract_rebuild [Fintype V] [Fintype E] {m : ℕ} (u v : E → V) (R : Finset V) (U : E → Finset (Fin m)) (base : E → Selection m) (s : E → Bool) (hs : LogicalHoles u v R (broken U) s) : extract U (rebuild U base s) = s := by classical funext e by_cases he : (U e).Nonempty · have hs' := hs.1 e ((mem_broken U e).mpr he) simp [extract,he,hs'] · simp [extract,rebuild,he] noncomputable def deletionEquiv {m : ℕ} (hm : Even m) (u v : E → V) (R₀ : Finset V) (U : E → Finset (Fin m)) (base : E → Selection m) (hb : FamilyHoles u v m R₀ U base) : {b : E → Selection m // FamilyHoles u v m R₀ U b} ≃ {s : E → Bool // LogicalHoles u v (residualHoles u v R₀ U base) (broken U) s} where toFun b := ⟨extract U b.val, by have h := extract_legal hm u v R₀ U b.val b.property rwa [residualHoles_independent u v R₀ U b.property hb] at h⟩ invFun s := ⟨rebuild U base s.val,rebuild_legal hm u v R₀ U base hb s.val s.property⟩ left_inv b := Subtype.ext (rebuild_extract u v R₀ U base b.val hb b.property) right_inv s := Subtype.ext (extract_rebuild u v _ U base s.val s.property) noncomputable def realHolePartition (u v : E → V) (m : ℕ) (R₀ : Finset V) (U : E → Finset (Fin m)) (w : E → Fin (m+1) → ℝ) : ℝ := by classical letI := Fintype.ofFinite {b : E → Selection m // FamilyHoles u v m R₀ U b} exact ∑ b : {b : E → Selection m // FamilyHoles u v m R₀ U b}, ∏ e, selectedWeight (w e) (b.val e) noncomputable def logicalHolePartition (u v : E → V) (R : Finset V) (forbidden : Finset E) (lam : E → ℝ) : ℝ := by classical letI := Fintype.ofFinite {s : E → Bool // LogicalHoles u v R forbidden s} exact ∑ s : {s : E → Bool // LogicalHoles u v R forbidden s}, ∏ e, if s.val e then lam e else 1 noncomputable def deletionConstant {m : ℕ} (U : E → Finset (Fin m)) (base : E → Selection m) (w : E → Fin (m+1) → ℝ) (C : E → ℝ) : ℝ := ∏ e, if (U e).Nonempty then selectedWeight (w e) (base e) else C e omit [Fintype V] [Fintype E] in theorem deletion_weight [Fintype V] [Fintype E] {m : ℕ} (u v : E → V) (R₀ : Finset V) (U : E → Finset (Fin m)) (base b : E → Selection m) (hb0 : FamilyHoles u v m R₀ U base) (hb : FamilyHoles u v m R₀ U b) (w : E → Fin (m+1) → ℝ) (left right : E → List ℝ) (lam : E → ℝ) (hw : ∀ e, List.ofFn (w e) = duplicate (left e) ++ [lam e] ++ duplicate (right e)) : (∏ e, selectedWeight (w e) (b e)) = deletionConstant U base w (fun e => (left e).prod * (right e).prod) * ∏ e, if extract U b e then lam e else 1 := by classical unfold deletionConstant rw [← Finset.prod_mul_distrib] apply Finset.prod_congr rfl intro e _ by_cases he : (U e).Nonempty · have heq := broken_unique he (hb0.1 e) (hb.1 e) simp [extract,he,heq] · have he' : U e = ∅ := Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.mp he simp only [extract,he,↓reduceIte] rw [intact_weight _ _ (by simpa [he'] using hb.1 e),hw e,profile_weight] theorem deletion_partition_identity {m : ℕ} (hm : Even m) (u v : E → V) (R₀ : Finset V) (U : E → Finset (Fin m)) (base : E → Selection m) (hb : FamilyHoles u v m R₀ U base) (w : E → Fin (m+1) → ℝ) (left right : E → List ℝ) (lam : E → ℝ) (hw : ∀ e, List.ofFn (w e) = duplicate (left e) ++ [lam e] ++ duplicate (right e)) : realHolePartition u v m R₀ U w = deletionConstant U base w (fun e => (left e).prod * (right e).prod) * logicalHolePartition u v (residualHoles u v R₀ U base) (broken U) lam := by classical let := Fintype.ofFinite {b : E → Selection m // FamilyHoles u v m R₀ U b} let := Fintype.ofFinite {s : E → Bool // LogicalHoles u v (residualHoles u v R₀ U base) (broken U) s} unfold realHolePartition logicalHolePartition rw [Finset.mul_sum] apply Fintype.sum_equiv (deletionEquiv hm u v R₀ U base hb) intro b exact deletion_weight u v R₀ U base b.val hb b.property w left right lam hw end Deletion theorem selectedWeight_vertex_factor {m : ℕ} (U : Finset (Fin m)) (b : Selection m) (hb : Valid U b) (z : Fin (m+2) → ℝ) : selectedWeight (fun i => z i.castSucc * z i.succ) b = (if b 0 then z 0 else 1) * (if b (Fin.last m) then z (Fin.last (m+1)) else 1) * ∏ i : Fin m, if i ∈ U then 1 else z i.succ.castSucc := by classical unfold selectedWeight have hsplit (i : Fin (m+1)) : (if b i then z i.castSucc * z i.succ else 1) = (if b i then z i.castSucc else 1) * (if b i then z i.succ else 1) := by cases b i <;> simp simp_rw [hsplit] rw [Finset.prod_mul_distrib, Fin.prod_univ_succ (fun i : Fin (m+1) => if b i then z i.castSucc else 1), Fin.prod_univ_castSucc (fun i : Fin (m+1) => if b i then z i.succ else 1)] have he : ∀ i : Fin m, (if b i.succ then z i.succ.castSucc else 1) * (if b i.castSucc then z i.castSucc.succ else 1) = if i ∈ U then 1 else z i.succ.castSucc := by intro i have hz : i.castSucc.succ = i.succ.castSucc := rfl rw [hz] have h := hb i by_cases hi : i ∈ U · simp only [hi,↓reduceIte] at h ⊢ simp [h.1,h.2] · simp only [hi,↓reduceIte] at h ⊢ cases h₁ : b i.castSucc <;> cases h₂ : b i.succ <;> simp_all calc _ = (if b 0 then z 0 else 1) * (if b (Fin.last m) then z (Fin.last (m+1)) else 1) * ∏ i : Fin m, ((if b i.succ then z i.succ.castSucc else 1) * (if b i.castSucc then z i.castSucc.succ else 1)) := by rw [Finset.prod_mul_distrib] simp only [Fin.castSucc_zero, Fin.succ_last] ring _ = _ := by simp_rw [he] theorem valid_interval {m : ℕ} {U : Finset (Fin m)} {b : Selection m} (hb : Valid U b) (a k : ℕ) (hak : a+k ≤ m) (hfree : ∀ i : Fin m, a ≤ i.val → i.val < a+k → i ∉ U) : b ⟨a+k,by omega⟩ = alternating (b ⟨a,by omega⟩) k := by induction k with | zero => simp | succ k ih => have hai : a+k < m := by omega have hf := hb ⟨a+k,hai⟩ simp only [hfree ⟨a+k,hai⟩ (by dsimp; omega) (by dsimp; omega),↓reduceIte] at hf have he := (bool_ne_iff_eq_not _ _).mp hf have hi := ih (by omega) (fun i hi hj => hfree i hi (by omega)) simpa only [Fin.succ_mk, Fin.castSucc_mk, Nat.add_assoc, alternating_succ, hi] using he theorem first_hole_terminal {m : ℕ} {U : Finset (Fin m)} {b : Selection m} (hb : Valid U b) (j : Fin m) (hj : j ∈ U) (hfirst : ∀ i ∈ U, j ≤ i) : b 0 = true ↔ j.val % 2 = 1 := by have hv := valid_interval hb 0 j.val (by omega) (by intro i hi hij him have hh := hfirst i him have : j.val ≤ i.val := hh omega) have hz : b j.castSucc = false := by have h := hb j simp only [hj,↓reduceIte] at h exact h.1 have he : b j.castSucc = alternating (b 0) j.val := by have ez : (⟨0,by omega⟩ : Fin (m+1)) = 0 := Fin.ext rfl have ee : (⟨0+j.val,by omega⟩ : Fin (m+1)) = j.castSucc := by apply Fin.ext; dsimp; omega rw [ee,ez] at hv exact hv rw [hz] at he by_cases h : j.val%2=0 · simp only [alternating,h,↓reduceIte] at he simp [← he,h] · have h1 : j.val%2=1 := by omega simp only [alternating,h,↓reduceIte] at he cases hbool : b 0 · rw [hbool] at he; contradiction · simp only [h1] end MatchingFPRAS.Subdivision end OAI