import OAI.Computability.DegreeRigidity.Representation.SourceTheory import OAI.Computability.DegreeRigidity.Syntax.FiniteTerm import OAI.Computability.DegreeRigidity.Syntax.BoundedFormulaRename namespace OAI namespace TuringRigidity.BoundedTruthRecursion open TransitiveNameModel BoundedSetTheory def Local (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) : Prop := ∀ D : ZFSet.{0}, Transitive D → ∀ t ∈ D, ∀ Y Z : ZFSet.{0}, (∀ s ∈ D, ZFSet.rank s < ZFSet.rank t → (s ∈ Y ↔ s ∈ Z)) → (φ.Eval (cons t (cons Y e)) ↔ φ.Eval (cons t (cons Z e))) def Partial (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (K D Y : ZFSet.{0}) : Prop := Transitive D ∧ D ⊆ K ∧ Y ⊆ D ∧ ∀ t ∈ D, t ∈ Y ↔ φ.Eval (cons t (cons Y e)) theorem partial_sound (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (K D Y Z : ZFSet.{0}) (hl : Local φ e) (hp : Partial φ e K D Y) (hz : ∀ t ∈ K, t ∈ Z ↔ φ.Eval (cons t (cons Z e))) : ∀ t ∈ D, t ∈ Y ↔ t ∈ Z := by have wf : WellFounded (fun a b : ZFSet.{0} => ZFSet.rank a < ZFSet.rank b) := InvImage.wf ZFSet.rank Ordinal.lt_wf intro t induction t using wf.induction with | h t ih => intro ht exact (hp.2.2.2 t ht).trans ((hl D hp.1 t ht Y Z (fun s hs hst => ih s hst hs)).trans (hz t (hp.2.1 ht)).symm) def dropSlots : ℕ → ℕ | 0 => 0 | 1 => 1 | n+2 => n+4 def partialFormula (φ : Formula) : Formula := .conj (.transitive 1) (.conj (.subset 1 2) (.conj (.subset 0 1) (.allMem 1 (.iff (.member 0 1) (φ.rename dropSlots))))) theorem partialFormula_spec (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (K D Y : ZFSet.{0}) : (partialFormula φ).Eval (cons Y (cons D (cons K e))) ↔ Partial φ e K D Y := by simp only [partialFormula,Formula.Eval,Formula.eval_transitive,Formula.eval_subset, Formula.eval_allMem,Formula.eval_iff,Formula.eval_rename_comp,cons_zero,cons_succ,Partial] have eq (t : ZFSet.{0}) : cons t (cons Y (cons D (cons K e))) ∘ dropSlots = cons t (cons Y e) := by funext i; rcases i with _|_|i <;> rfl simp only [eq] noncomputable def domain (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (K Q : ZFSet.{0}) : ZFSet.{0} := K.sep (fun t => ∃ D ∈ Q, ∃ Y ∈ Q, Partial φ e K D Y ∧ t ∈ D) noncomputable def truth (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (K Q : ZFSet.{0}) : ZFSet.{0} := K.sep (fun t => ∃ D ∈ Q, ∃ Y ∈ Q, Partial φ e K D Y ∧ t ∈ Y) def candidateSlots : ℕ → ℕ | 0 => 0 | 1 => 1 | n+2 => n+4 def unionFormula (φ : Formula) (which : ℕ) : Formula := .existsMem 1 (.existsMem 2 (.conj ((partialFormula φ).rename candidateSlots) (.member 2 which))) theorem unionFormula_spec (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (K Q t : ZFSet.{0}) (which : ℕ) : (unionFormula φ which).Eval (cons t (cons Q (cons K e))) ↔ ∃ D ∈ Q, ∃ Y ∈ Q, Partial φ e K D Y ∧ t ∈ cons Y (cons D (cons t (cons Q (cons K e)))) which := by simp only [unionFormula,Formula.Eval,Formula.eval_rename_comp,cons_zero,cons_succ] have eq (D Y : ZFSet.{0}) : cons Y (cons D (cons t (cons Q (cons K e)))) ∘ candidateSlots = cons Y (cons D (cons K e)) := by funext i; rcases i with _|_|i <;> rfl simp only [eq,partialFormula_spec] theorem domain_truth_mem (M K Q : ZFSet.{0}) (hM : Transitive M) (hT : SourceT M) (hK : K ∈ M) (hQ : Q ∈ M) (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (he : ∀ i, e i ∈ M) : domain φ e K Q ∈ M ∧ truth φ e K Q ∈ M := by have henv : ∀ i, cons Q (cons K e) i ∈ M := by intro i; rcases i with _|_|i; exact hQ; exact hK; exact he i constructor · have hs := sep_mem M hM hT.separation.finitePrefix.bounded (unionFormula φ 1) _ henv hK simpa only [unionFormula_spec,cons_succ,cons_zero,domain] using hs · have hs := sep_mem M hM hT.separation.finitePrefix.bounded (unionFormula φ 0) _ henv hK simpa only [unionFormula_spec,cons_succ,cons_zero,truth] using hs theorem domain_transitive (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (K Q : ZFSet.{0}) : Transitive (domain φ e K Q) := by intro t ht s hst obtain ⟨_,D,hD,Y,hY,hp,htD⟩ := ZFSet.mem_sep.mp ht have hsD := hp.1 t htD s hst exact ZFSet.mem_sep.mpr ⟨hp.2.1 hsD,D,hD,Y,hY,hp,hsD⟩ theorem truth_subset_domain (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (K Q : ZFSet.{0}) : truth φ e K Q ⊆ domain φ e K Q := by intro t ht obtain ⟨htK,D,hD,Y,hY,hp,htY⟩ := ZFSet.mem_sep.mp ht exact ZFSet.mem_sep.mpr ⟨htK,D,hD,Y,hY,hp,hp.2.2.1 htY⟩ theorem truth_agrees (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (K Q Z : ZFSet.{0}) (hl : Local φ e) (hz : ∀ t ∈ K, t ∈ Z ↔ φ.Eval (cons t (cons Z e))) : ∀ t ∈ domain φ e K Q, t ∈ truth φ e K Q ↔ t ∈ Z := by intro t ht constructor · intro h obtain ⟨_,D,_,Y,_,hp,htY⟩ := ZFSet.mem_sep.mp h exact (partial_sound φ e K D Y Z hl hp hz t (hp.2.2.1 htY)).mp htY · intro h obtain ⟨htK,D,hD,Y,hY,hp,htD⟩ := ZFSet.mem_sep.mp ht exact ZFSet.mem_sep.mpr ⟨htK,D,hD,Y,hY,hp,(partial_sound φ e K D Y Z hl hp hz t htD).mpr h⟩ theorem partial_of_agrees (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (K D Y Z : ZFSet.{0}) (hl : Local φ e) (hz : ∀ t ∈ K, t ∈ Z ↔ φ.Eval (cons t (cons Z e))) (hD : Transitive D) (hDK : D ⊆ K) (hYD : Y ⊆ D) (ha : ∀ t ∈ D, t ∈ Y ↔ t ∈ Z) : Partial φ e K D Y := by refine ⟨hD,hDK,hYD,?_⟩ intro t ht exact (ha t ht).trans ((hz t (hDK ht)).trans (hl D hD t ht Y Z (fun s hs _ => ha s hs)).symm) theorem truth_internal (M K Z : ZFSet.{0}) (hM : Transitive M) (hT : SourceT M) (hKM : K ∈ M) (hK : Transitive K) (φ : Formula) (e : ℕ → ZFSet.{0}) (he : ∀ i, e i ∈ M) (hl : Local φ e) (hz : ∀ t ∈ K, t ∈ Z ↔ φ.Eval (cons t (cons Z e))) : K.sep (fun t => t ∈ Z) ∈ M := by classical obtain ⟨Q,hQM,hQ⟩ := internal_power M hM hT.powerSet hKM let D := domain φ e K Q let Y := truth φ e K Q obtain ⟨hDM,hYM⟩ := domain_truth_mem M K Q hM hT hKM hQM φ e he have hD : Transitive D := domain_transitive φ e K Q have hDK : D ⊆ K := fun _ h => (ZFSet.mem_sep.mp h).1 have hYD : Y ⊆ D := truth_subset_domain φ e K Q have ha : ∀ t ∈ D, t ∈ Y ↔ t ∈ Z := truth_agrees φ e K Q Z hl hz have hcover (t : ZFSet.{0}) : t ∈ K → t ∈ D := by induction t using ZFSet.inductionOn with | h t ih => intro htK by_cases htD : t ∈ D · exact htD have hchildren : t ⊆ D := fun s hs => ih s hs (hK t htK s hs) let D' := D ∪ ({t} : ZFSet.{0}) let Y' := if t ∈ Z then Y ∪ ({t} : ZFSet.{0}) else Y have hDD' : D ⊆ D' := fun _ h => ZFSet.mem_union.mpr (Or.inl h) have htD' : t ∈ D' := ZFSet.mem_union.mpr (Or.inr (ZFSet.mem_singleton.mpr rfl)) have hD' : Transitive D' := by intro a ha b hb rcases ZFSet.mem_union.mp ha with ha | ha · exact hDD' (hD a ha b hb) · have ha := ZFSet.mem_singleton.mp ha subst a exact hDD' (hchildren hb) have hD'K : D' ⊆ K := by intro a ha rcases ZFSet.mem_union.mp ha with ha | ha · exact hDK ha · exact (ZFSet.mem_singleton.mp ha) ▸ htK have hY'D' : Y' ⊆ D' := by intro a ha dsimp [Y'] at ha split_ifs at ha · rcases ZFSet.mem_union.mp ha with ha | ha · exact hDD' (hYD ha) · exact (ZFSet.mem_singleton.mp ha) ▸ htD' · exact hDD' (hYD ha) have ha' : ∀ a ∈ D', a ∈ Y' ↔ a ∈ Z := by intro a haD' by_cases hat : a = t · subst a have htY : t ∉ Y := fun h => htD (hYD h) simp only [Y'] split_ifs with htZ <;> simp [htZ,htY] · have haD : a ∈ D := (ZFSet.mem_union.mp haD').resolve_right (fun h => hat (ZFSet.mem_singleton.mp h)) have hae := ha a haD dsimp [Y'] split_ifs <;> simpa only [ZFSet.mem_union,ZFSet.mem_singleton,hat,or_false] using hae have htM := hM K hKM t htK have hsM := singleton_mem M hM hT.pairing htM have hD'M : D' ∈ M := binary_union_mem M hM hT.pairing hT.union hDM hsM have hY'M : Y' ∈ M := by dsimp [Y']; split_ifs · exact binary_union_mem M hM hT.pairing hT.union hYM hsM · exact hYM exact ZFSet.mem_sep.mpr ⟨htK,D',(hQ _).mpr ⟨hD'M,hD'K⟩, Y',(hQ _).mpr ⟨hY'M,fun _ h => hD'K (hY'D' h)⟩, partial_of_agrees φ e K D' Y' Z hl hz hD' hD'K hY'D' ha',htD'⟩ have eq : Y = K.sep (fun t => t ∈ Z) := by apply ZFSet.ext; intro t constructor · intro ht exact ZFSet.mem_sep.mpr ⟨hDK (hYD ht),(ha t (hYD ht)).mp ht⟩ · intro ht obtain ⟨htK,htZ⟩ := ZFSet.mem_sep.mp ht exact (ha t (hcover t htK)).mpr htZ exact eq ▸ hYM end TuringRigidity.BoundedTruthRecursion end OAI