import OAI.Computability.Logspace.TransitionTables namespace OAI /-! Bounded natural-register programs and their realization by finite deterministic machines. From OpenAI, *Exact Derandomization of Logarithmic Space: L = RL = BPL*. -/ set_option autoImplicit true section namespace ExactDerandomization.Counter def scan (x : Word) (m : ℕ) : InputSymbol := if h : m < x.length+2 then readInput x ⟨m,h⟩ else .rightMarker @[simp] lemma scan_zero (x : Word) : scan x 0 = .leftMarker := by simp [scan, readInput] @[simp] lemma scan_lt (x : Word) (m : Fin (x.length+2)) : scan x m.val = readInput x m := by simp [scan] @[simp] lemma marker_left {x : Word} {m : Fin (x.length+2)} : readInput x m = .leftMarker ↔ m.val = 0 := by unfold readInput; split · simp_all · split <;> simp_all @[simp] lemma marker_right {x : Word} {m : Fin (x.length+2)} : readInput x m = .rightMarker ↔ m.val+1 = x.length+2 := by classical unfold readInput; split · simp_all · rename_i h split · rename_i he obtain ⟨hlt, _⟩ := List.getElem?_eq_some_iff.mp he simp omega · rename_i he have := List.getElem?_eq_none_iff.mp he simp omega lemma scan_is_zero (x : Word) (m : ℕ) : scan x m = .leftMarker ↔ m = 0 := by unfold scan; split <;> simp_all omega /-- dir = false means ascending -/ def dir (q : ℕ) : Bool := decide (q%2=1) @[simp] lemma dir_zero : dir 0 = false := rfl @[simp] lemma dir_next (q) : dir (q+1) = !(dir q) := by unfold dir rw [Bool.eq_iff_iff]; simp; omega def digit (n a : ℕ) : Fin (n+2) := let r : Fin (n+2) := ⟨a%(n+2), Nat.mod_lt _ (by omega)⟩ if dir (a/(n+2)) then r.rev else r def dirs (n : ℕ) : (d a : ℕ) → Fin d → Bool | 0, _ => Fin.elim0 | d+1, a => Fin.cons (dir (a/(n+2))) (dirs n d (a/(n+2))) def digits (n : ℕ) : (d a : ℕ) → Fin d → Fin (n+2) | 0, _ => Fin.elim0 | d+1, a => Fin.cons (digit n a) (digits n d (a/(n+2))) lemma dirs_zero (n d : ℕ) : dirs n d 0 = fun _ => false := by induction d with | zero => exact funext (fun i => Fin.elim0 i) | succ d ih => ext i refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp [dirs, ih] lemma digits_zero (n d : ℕ) : digits n d 0 = fun _ => ⟨0, by omega⟩ := by induction d with | zero => exact funext (fun i => Fin.elim0 i) | succ d ih => funext i refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp [digits, digit, ih] abbrev obs (x : Word) (d a : ℕ) := fun i => readInput x (digits x.length d a i) lemma quot_bound {n d a : ℕ} (h : a < (n+2)^(d+1)) : a/(n+2) < (n+2)^d := (Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul (by omega)).mpr (by simpa [pow_succ] using h) lemma eq_zero_obs (x : Word) (d a : ℕ) (h : a < (x.length+2)^d) : (∀ i, obs x d a i = .leftMarker) ↔ a = 0 := by refine ⟨?_, fun e i => ?_⟩ · induction d generalizing a with | zero => simpa using Nat.lt_one_iff.mp h | succ d ih => intro hp have high := (ih (a/(x.length+2)) (quot_bound h)) fun i => by simpa [obs, digits] using hp (Fin.succ i) have low := marker_left.1 (hp 0) simp [digits,digit,high] at low have := Nat.mod_add_div a (x.length+2) rw [high, low] at this simpa [eq_comm] using this · simp [obs, e, digits_zero, readInput] def symbol : (d : ℕ) → (Fin d → InputSymbol) → InputSymbol | 0, _ => .leftMarker | d+1, r => if ∀ i : Fin d, r i.succ = .leftMarker then r 0 else .rightMarker lemma symbol_obs (x : Word) (d a : ℕ) (h : a < (x.length+2)^d) : symbol d (obs x d a) = scan x a := by cases d with | zero => have : a=0 := by simpa using h simp [symbol, this] | succ d => have ih := eq_zero_obs x d (a/(x.length+2)) (quot_bound h) simp only [symbol, obs, digits, Fin.cons_succ, Fin.cons_zero] by_cases hh : a < x.length+2 · have h0 : a/(x.length+2)=0 := Nat.div_eq_of_lt hh simp [digit, h0, digits_zero, scan, hh, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hh] · have h0 : a/(x.length+2) ≠ 0 := Nat.ne_of_gt ( Nat.div_pos (by omega) (by omega)) simp [obs] at ih simp [ih, scan, hh] /-- gray positive step at a digit: 'up' = increase overall number, 'rev' = digit reversed -/ def goLeft (up rev : Bool) : Bool := decide (up = rev) def spills (up rev : Bool) (s : InputSymbol) : Bool := decide (s = if goLeft up rev then InputSymbol.leftMarker else InputSymbol.rightMarker) def shift (up rev : Bool) : Direction := if goLeft up rev then .left else .right /-- change orientation and multi-head moves, attempting to step (uses at interior, no overflow or underflow) -/ def attempt (up : Bool) : (d : ℕ) → (Fin d → Bool) → (Fin d → InputSymbol) → (Fin d → Bool) × (Fin d → Direction) | 0, r, _ => (r, Fin.elim0) | d+1, r, s => if spills up (r 0) (s 0) then let q := attempt up d (fun i => r i.succ) (fun i => s i.succ) (Fin.cons (!(r 0)) q.1, Fin.cons .stay q.2) else (r, Fin.cons (shift up (r 0)) fun _ => .stay) abbrev steps (up : Bool) (x : Word) (d a b : ℕ) : Prop := let q := attempt up d (dirs x.length d a) (obs x d a) q.1 = dirs x.length d b ∧ dirs_needs_move x.length q.2 (digits x.length d a) (digits x.length d b) where dirs_needs_move n {d : ℕ} (m : Fin d → Direction) (a b : Fin d → Fin (n+2)) := ∀ i, (m i).moveInput (a i) = b i lemma low_steps (up) (x : Word) (d a b : ℕ) (he : a/(x.length+2) = b/(x.length+2)) (hf : spills up (dir (a/(x.length+2))) (readInput x (digit x.length a)) = false) (hs : (shift up (dir (a/(x.length+2)))).moveInput (digit x.length a) = digit x.length b) : steps up x (d+1) a b := by simp only [steps, dirs, digits, steps.dirs_needs_move, obs, attempt, Fin.cons_zero, hf, Bool.false_eq_true, ↓reduceIte] rw [← he] refine ⟨rfl, fun i => ?_⟩ refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i · simpa using hs · simp [Direction.moveInput] lemma high_steps (up) (x : Word) (d a b : ℕ) (he : (!(dir (a/(x.length+2)))) = dir (b/(x.length+2))) (hf : spills up (dir (a/(x.length+2))) (readInput x (digit x.length a)) = true) (hs : digit x.length a = digit x.length b) (hh : steps up x d (a/(x.length+2)) (b/(x.length+2))) : steps up x (d+1) a b := by simp only [steps, steps.dirs_needs_move] at * simp only [obs, dirs, digits, attempt, Fin.cons_zero, Fin.cons_succ, hf, ↓reduceIte, he, eq_self] constructor · congr 1; exact hh.1 · intro i refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i · simpa [Direction.moveInput] using hs · intro j; simpa using hh.2 j lemma attempt_both (x : Word) (d a : ℕ) (h : a+1<(x.length+2)^d) : steps true x d a (a+1) ∧ steps false x d (a+1) a := by induction d generalizing a with | zero => simp at h | succ d ih => let n := x.length let q := a / (n+2) let l := a % (n+2) have hl : l < n+2 := Nat.mod_lt _ (by omega) have ha : l+(n+2)*q=a := Nat.mod_add_div a _ have he : a+1 = (l+1)+(n+2)*q := by omega have ha1 : (a+1)/(n+2) = (l+1)/(n+2)+q := by rw [he, Nat.add_mul_div_left _ _ (by omega)] have ha2 : (a+1)%(n+2) = (l+1)%(n+2) := by rw [he,Nat.add_mul_mod_self_left] have h0 : a%(x.length+2)=l := rfl by_cases hm : l+1 (refine ⟨low_steps _ _ _ _ _ h1.symm ?_ ?_, low_steps _ _ _ _ _ h1 ?_ ?_⟩ <;> simp [spills, digit, shift, goLeft, e, h1, Direction.moveInput, Fin.ext_iff, Fin.rev] <;> omega) · have hm' : l+1=n+2 := by omega have h1 : (a+1)/(x.length+2)=a/(x.length+2)+1 := by rw [ha1,hm', Nat.div_self (by omega), Nat.add_comm] have h2 : (a+1)%(x.length+2)=0 := ha2.trans (by rw [hm', Nat.mod_self]) have hk := quot_bound h rw [h1] at hk have hg := ih _ hk cases e : dir (a/(x.length+2)) <;> (constructor · refine high_steps _ _ _ _ _ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ · simp [h1] · simp [digit,spills,e,goLeft,Fin.rev]; omega · simp [h1,e,digit,Fin.ext_iff,Fin.rev]; omega · rw [h1]; exact hg.1 · refine high_steps _ _ _ _ _ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ · simp [h1] · simp [digit,h1,spills,e,goLeft,Fin.rev]; omega · simp [h1,e,digit,Fin.ext_iff,Fin.rev]; omega · rw [h1]; exact hg.2) def adj (d : ℕ) (b : Direction) (o : Fin d → Bool) (r : Fin d → InputSymbol) : (Fin d → Bool) × (Fin d → Direction) := match b with | .stay => (o,fun _=>.stay) | .left => if symbol d r = .leftMarker then (o,fun _=>.stay) else attempt false d o r | .right => attempt true d o r def ch (b : Direction) (a : ℕ) := match b with | .stay => a | .left => a-1 | .right => a+1 lemma adj_spec (d : ℕ) (b : Direction) (a : ℕ) (x : Word) (h : a<(x.length+2)^d) (h' : ch b a < (x.length+2)^d) : let q := adj d b (dirs x.length d a) (obs x d a) q.1 = dirs x.length d (ch b a) ∧ ∀ i, (q.2 i).moveInput (digits x.length d a i) = digits x.length d (ch b a) i := by cases b with | stay => exact ⟨rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩ | right => exact (attempt_both x d a h').1 | left => simp only [adj, symbol_obs x d a h, scan_is_zero, ch] split · rename_i e; subst a; exact ⟨rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩ · match a with | c+1 => simpa [steps, steps.dirs_needs_move] using (attempt_both x d c h).2 end ExactDerandomization.Counter end section /-! A finite-control, natural-register while-program implementation device. CM source semantics has unbounded natural counters, left motion clipped at zero, read of symbol at counter address (off-data is Right, hence Left iff zero). To compile to Machine we must prove all counters at all steps are of polynomial magnitude. Only a fixed number of counters is ever used. -/ namespace ExactDerandomization.Counter abbrev Store := ℕ → ℕ abbrev Fit (c : Store) (k : ℕ) := ∀ i, c i < k /-- bounded program instruction: read at i, set pc and maybe ±1 that same i. -/ structure Jump (S : Type) where atReg : ℕ op : InputSymbol → S × Direction def tweak (c : Store) (i : ℕ) (b : Direction) : Store := fun j => ch (if i=j then b else .stay) (c j) @[simp] theorem tweak_self (c : Store) (i : ℕ) (b : Direction) : tweak c i b i = ch b (c i) := by simp [tweak] @[simp] theorem tweak_other (c : Store) (i : ℕ) (b : Direction) (j : ℕ) (h : i≠j) : tweak c i b j = c j := by simp [tweak,h,ch] @[simp] theorem tweak_stay (c : Store) (i : ℕ) : tweak c i .stay = c := by funext a; simp [tweak,ch] variable {S : Type} def Jump.apply (j : Jump S) (x : Word) (c : Store) : S × Store := let a := j.op (scan x (c j.atReg)) (a.1, tweak c j.atReg a.2) structure CM (S : Type) where start : S prog : S → Bool ⊕ Jump S namespace CM variable (p : CM S) inductive Runs (x : Word) (k : ℕ) : S → Store → Bool → Prop | stop s c b (hc : Fit c k) (es : p.prog s = .inl b) : Runs x k s c b | more {s c s' c' b} (j : Jump S) (hc : Fit c k) (es : p.prog s = .inr j) (ea : j.apply x c = (s', c')) (h : Runs x k s' c' b) : Runs x k s c b theorem Runs.fits {x : Word} {k : ℕ} {c : Store} {s b} (h : p.Runs x k s c b) : Fit c k := by cases h <;> assumption open Table def tab (m d : ℕ) : TM (S × (Fin m → Fin d → Bool)) Empty (Fin m × Fin d) := { start := (p.start, fun _ _ => false) out := fun s => match p.prog s.1 with | .inl b => some b | .inr _ => none go := fun s r v _ => match p.prog s.1 with | .inl _ => TM.idle s v | .inr j => if e : j.atReg < m then let scans := fun (i : Fin m) u => r (i,u) let a := j.op (symbol d (scans ⟨j.atReg,e⟩)) let z := fun (i : Fin m) => adj d (if j.atReg=i.val then a.2 else .stay) (s.2 i) (scans i) ⟨(a.1, fun i => (z i).1), v, Empty.elim, fun (i,u) => (z i).2 u⟩ else TM.idle s v } def rep (n m d : ℕ) (s : S) (c : Store) : Table.Conf (S × (Fin m → Fin d → Bool)) Empty (Fin m × Fin d) n := ⟨(s,fun i => dirs n d (c i.val)),fun (i,u) => digits n d (c i.val) u,Empty.elim,Empty.elim⟩ lemma rep_step {m d : ℕ} (x : Word) (s : S) (c : Store) (coin) (j : Jump S) (ep : p.prog s = .inr j) (hm : j.atReg < m) (ha : Fit c ((x.length+2)^d)) (hb : Fit (j.apply x c).2 ((x.length+2)^d)) : (p.tab m d).step x coin (rep x.length m d s c) = rep x.length m d (j.apply x c).1 (j.apply x c).2 := by let a := j.op (scan x (c j.atReg)) let b (i : Fin m) : Direction := if j.atReg=i.val then a.2 else .stay have hs (i : Fin m) := adj_spec d (b i) (c i) x (ha _) (hb i) simp only [TM.step, rep, tab, ep, hm, ↓reduceDIte, TM.applyAct, Jump.apply] rw [symbol_obs x d (c j.atReg) (ha j.atReg)] refine Conf.ext (Prod.ext rfl (funext fun i => (hs i).1)) ?_ ?_ ?_ · exact funext fun i => (hs i.1).2 i.2 · exact funext fun e => Empty.elim e · exact funext fun e => Empty.elim e /-- A Runs derivation supplies an input-dependent but tape-independent clock. -/ theorem realize {x : Word} {m d : ℕ} (hm : ∀ s j, p.prog s = .inr j → j.atReg < m) {s : S} {c : Store} {b : Bool} (h : p.Runs x ((x.length+2)^d) s c b) : ∀ t, (∀ coins, (p.tab m d).run x coins t = rep x.length m d s c) → ∃ u, ∀ coins, (p.tab m d).out ((p.tab m d).run x coins u).state = some b := by induction h with | stop s c b hc es => intro t ht; exact ⟨t, fun coins => by rw [ht]; simp [rep, tab, es]⟩ | @more s c s' c' b j hc es ea h ih => intro t ht refine ih (t+1) fun coins => ?_ have he := p.rep_step (m:=m) x s c (coins t) j es (hm s j es) hc (by rw [ea]; exact h.fits) rw [TM.run, ht, he, ea] theorem gives_L [Finite S] (A : Language) (d : ℕ) (h : ∀ x : Word, ∃ b : Bool, (b=true ↔ x∈A) ∧ p.Runs x ((x.length+2)^d) p.start (fun _ => 0) b) : A ∈ L := by classical let : Fintype S := Fintype.ofFinite S let cnt (s : S) := (p.prog s).elim (fun _=>0) fun j => j.atReg let m : ℕ := 1+∑ s:S, cnt s have hm : ∀ s j, p.prog s = .inr j → j.atReg < m := by intro s j e have := Finset.single_le_sum (s:=Finset.univ) (f:=cnt) (fun _ _ => Nat.zero_le _) (Finset.mem_univ s) have : cnt s = j.atReg := by simp [cnt, e] dsimp only [m] omega let Q := p.tab m d let : Nonempty S := ⟨p.start⟩ let num := @TM.number (S × (Fin m → Fin d → Bool)) _ _ let f := Fintype.equivFin Empty let g := Fintype.equivFin (Fin m × Fin d) refine ⟨_,_,_,Q.reindex num f g,TM.det_reindex _ _ _ _ (fun _ _ _=>rfl), ?_, ?_⟩ · exact ⟨1, Nat.one_pos, fun x coins t => by rw [TM.space_reindex]; simp [TM.spaceThrough]⟩ · intro x obtain ⟨b,eb,hb⟩ := h x have hi (coins : CoinTape) : Q.run x coins 0 = rep x.length m d p.start (fun _ => 0) := by refine Conf.ext ?_ ?_ (funext fun e => Empty.elim e) (funext fun e => Empty.elim e) · simp [Q, TM.run, TM.init, tab, rep, dirs_zero] · simp [Q, TM.run, TM.init, rep, digits_zero] obtain ⟨u,hu⟩ := p.realize hm hb 0 hi exact ⟨u,b,eb,fun coins => by rw [TM.out_reindex]; exact hu coins⟩ end CM end ExactDerandomization.Counter end section namespace ExactDerandomization.Counter inductive Cmd where | atom (i : ℕ) (b : Direction) | seq (p q : Cmd) | bif (i : ℕ) (test : InputSymbol → Bool) (p q : Cmd) | loop (i : ℕ) (test : InputSymbol → Bool) (body : Cmd) namespace Cmd abbrev cond (i : ℕ) (test : InputSymbol → Bool) (x : Word) (a : Store) : Bool := test (scan x (a i)) inductive Run (x : Word) (k : ℕ) : Cmd → Store → Store → Prop | atom {i d a b} (e : tweak a i d = b) (ha : Fit a k) (hb : Fit b k) : Run x k (.atom i d) a b | seq {p q a b c} : Run x k p a b → Run x k q b c → Run x k (.seq p q) a c | yes {i t a b p q} : cond i t x a = true → Run x k p a b → Run x k (.bif i t p q) a b | no {i t a b p q} : cond i t x a = false → Run x k q a b → Run x k (.bif i t p q) a b | endLoop {i t a p} : cond i t x a = false → Fit a k → Run x k (.loop i t p) a a | iter {i t a b c p} : cond i t x a = true → Run x k p a b → Run x k (.loop i t p) b c → Run x k (.loop i t p) a c lemma Run.fits {x k p a c} (h : Run x k p a c) : Fit a k ∧ Fit c k := by induction h <;> grind lemma Run.mono {x k p a c} (h : Run x k p a c) {l} (e : k≤l) : Run x l p a c := by have imp (a) (h : Fit a k) : Fit a l := fun i => lt_of_lt_of_le (h i) e induction h with | atom eq ha hb => exact .atom eq (imp _ ha) (imp _ hb) | seq _ _ ha hb => exact .seq ha hb | yes h _ ha => exact .yes h ha | no h _ ha => exact .no h ha | endLoop h hk => exact .endLoop h (imp _ hk) | iter h _ _ ha hb => exact .iter h ha hb def Node : Cmd → Type | .atom _ _ => Unit | .seq p q => Node p ⊕ Node q | .bif _ _ p q => Unit ⊕ Node p ⊕ Node q | .loop _ _ p => Unit ⊕ Node p instance (p : Cmd) : Finite (Node p) := by induction p <;> (dsimp only [Node]; infer_instance) def enter : (p : Cmd) → Node p | .atom _ _ => () | .seq p _ => Sum.inl (enter p) | .bif .. => Sum.inl () | .loop .. => Sum.inl () variable {S : Type} def code : (p : Cmd) → (Node p → S) → S → Node p → Jump S | .atom i b, _, y, _ => ⟨i,fun _=>(y,b)⟩ | .seq p q, f, _, Sum.inl u => code p (fun u => f (Sum.inl u)) (f (Sum.inr (enter q))) u | .seq _p q, f, y, Sum.inr u => code q (fun u => f (Sum.inr u)) y u | .bif i t p q, f, _, Sum.inl _ => ⟨i,fun s => (f (Sum.inr (if t s then Sum.inl (enter p) else Sum.inr (enter q))),.stay)⟩ | .bif _ _ p _q, f, y, Sum.inr (Sum.inl u) => code p (fun u=> f (Sum.inr (Sum.inl u))) y u | .bif _ _ _p q, f, y, Sum.inr (Sum.inr u) => code q (fun u=> f (Sum.inr (Sum.inr u))) y u | .loop i t p, f, y, Sum.inl _ => ⟨i, fun s => (if t s then f (Sum.inr (enter p)) else y,.stay)⟩ | .loop _ _ p, f, _, Sum.inr u => code p (fun u => f (Sum.inr u)) (f (Sum.inl ())) u lemma compile {x k p a c} (h : Run x k p a c) {P : CM S} : ∀ (f : Node p → S) y b, (∀ u, P.prog (f u) = .inr (code p f y u)) → P.Runs x k y c b → P.Runs x k (f (enter p)) a b := by induction h with | @atom i d a b e ha hb => intro f y v h hp apply CM.Runs.more (code _ _ _ (enter (.atom i d))) ha (h _) _ hp simp only [code, Jump.apply,e] | @seq p q a b c hab hbc ihp ihq => intro f y v h hp apply ihp (fun u => f (Sum.inl u)) (f (Sum.inr (enter q))) v · exact fun u => h (Sum.inl u) exact ihq (fun u => f (Sum.inr u)) y v (fun u => h (Sum.inr u)) hp | @yes i t a b p q e hab ih => intro f y v h hp have he := ih (fun u=> f (Sum.inr (Sum.inl u))) y v (fun u => h (Sum.inr (Sum.inl u))) hp refine CM.Runs.more (code _ _ _ (enter (.bif i t p q))) hab.fits.1 (h _) ?_ he simp [code, enter, Jump.apply, cond] at * rw [ite_eq_left e] | @no i t a b p q e hab ih => intro f y v h hp have he := ih (fun u=> f (Sum.inr (Sum.inr u))) y v (fun u => h (Sum.inr (Sum.inr u))) hp refine CM.Runs.more (code _ _ _ (enter (.bif i t p q))) hab.fits.1 (h _) ?_ he dsimp only [cond] at e simp [code, enter, Jump.apply,e] | @endLoop i t a p h ha => intro f y v he hp refine CM.Runs.more (code _ _ _ (enter (.loop i t p))) ha (he _) ?_ hp dsimp only [cond] at h simp [code, enter, Jump.apply,h] | @iter i t a b c p h hab hbc ihp ihq => intro f y v he hp have hu := ihp (fun u=> f (Sum.inr u)) (f (Sum.inl ())) v (fun u => he (Sum.inr u)) (ihq f y v he hp) refine CM.Runs.more (code _ _ _ (enter (.loop i t p))) hab.fits.1 (he _) ?_ hu dsimp only [cond] at h simp [code, enter, Jump.apply,h] abbrev States (p : Cmd) := Unit ⊕ Bool ⊕ Node p def mach (p : Cmd) (i : ℕ) : CM (States p) := let f := fun u => Sum.inr (Sum.inr u) { start := f (enter p) prog := fun s => match s with | Sum.inl _ => Sum.inr ⟨i, fun s => (Sum.inr (Sum.inl (decide (s≠.leftMarker))),.stay)⟩ | Sum.inr (Sum.inl b) => Sum.inl b | Sum.inr (Sum.inr u) => Sum.inr (code p f (Sum.inl ()) u) } theorem while_L (p : Cmd) (i d : ℕ) (A : Language) (h : ∀ x : Word, ∃ c, Run x ((x.length+2)^d) p (fun _=>0) c ∧ (c i ≠ 0 ↔ x∈A)) : A ∈ L := by apply CM.gives_L (p.mach i) A d intro x obtain ⟨c,e,h⟩ := h x let v := decide (scan x (c i) ≠ .leftMarker) refine ⟨v, by simp [v, scan_is_zero,h], compile e (fun u=>Sum.inr (Sum.inr u)) (Sum.inl ()) v (fun _ => rfl) ?_⟩ apply CM.Runs.more _ e.fits.2 rfl _ ( CM.Runs.stop (Sum.inr (Sum.inl v)) c v e.fits.2 rfl) simp [Jump.apply,v] end Cmd end ExactDerandomization.Counter end section namespace ExactDerandomization.Counter abbrev High0 (a : Store) (l : ℕ) := ∀ i, l ≤ i → a i=0 abbrev put (a : Store) (i v : ℕ) : Store := fun j => if i=j then v else a j @[simp] lemma put_self (a i v) : put a i v i = v := by simp [put] @[simp] lemma put_ne (a i v j) (e : i≠j) : put a i v j = a j := by simp [put,e] @[simp] lemma put_same (a i) : put a i (a i) = a := by funext j; by_cases i=j <;> simp_all @[simp] lemma put_over (a i v w) : put (put a i v) i w = put a i w := by funext j; by_cases i=j <;> simp_all lemma put_swap (a i j v w) (e : i≠j) : put (put a i v) j w = put (put a j w) i v := by funext r by_cases i=r <;> by_cases j=r <;> simp_all lemma put_fit {a k v} (i) (h : Fit a k) (hv : v simp_all [Fit] lemma put_high0 {a i l} (v) (h : High0 a l) (hi : i simp_all abbrev Tr := Word → Store → Store /-- Counter program transformations, correctness with initial certified zeros available FROM threshold l onwards. l is quantified: we can request a program with the scratch moved out to make room. d bounds all counters throughout simultaneously. -/ def Room (f : Tr) (l : ℕ) : Prop := ∃ p : Cmd, ∃ d : ℕ, 0 lt_of_lt_of_le (h i) hl lemma high_mono {a k l} (h : High0 a k) (hl : k≤l) : High0 a l := fun i hi => h i (le_trans hl hi) lemma self_pow {B d : ℕ} (hp : 0 g x (f x a)) := by obtain ⟨k,h⟩ := h; obtain ⟨l,e⟩ := e refine ⟨k+l,fun r hr => ?_⟩ obtain ⟨p,d,hd,h⟩ := h r (by omega) obtain ⟨q,D,hD,e⟩ := e r (by omega) refine ⟨.seq p q,d*D,by positivity,fun x a B hB hh hf => ?_⟩ obtain ⟨hp, hz⟩ := h x a B hB hh hf have hB2 := self_pow (B:=B) (by omega) hd obtain ⟨hq,hzq⟩ := e x _ (B^d) (le_trans hB hB2) hz hp.fits.2 rw [pow_mul] exact ⟨.seq (hp.mono (self_pow (by omega) hD)) hq,hzq⟩ lemma Op.hide {f : Tr} (h : ∃ k, ∀ l, k≤l → ∃ g : Tr, Op g ∧ ∀ x a, High0 a l → f x a = g x a ∧ High0 (f x a) l) : Op f := by obtain ⟨k,h⟩ := h refine ⟨k, fun l hl => ?_⟩ obtain ⟨g,⟨t,ht⟩,he⟩ := h l hl obtain ⟨p,d,hd,hg⟩ := ht (t+l) (by omega) refine ⟨p,d,hd,fun x a B hB hh hf => ⟨?_, (he _ _ hh).2⟩⟩ rw [(he _ _ hh).1] exact (hg _ _ _ hB (high_mono hh (by omega)) hf).1 lemma Op.atom (i d) : Op (fun _x a => put a i (ch d (a i))) := by refine ⟨i+1,fun l hl => ⟨.atom i d,2,by decide,fun x a B hb hh hf => ?_⟩⟩ have e : 1 dsimp [ch] <;> omega lemma Op.identity : Op (fun _ a=>a) := by simpa [ch] using Op.atom 0 .stay lemma Op.inc (i) : Op (fun _ a=>put a i (a i+1)) := Op.atom i .right lemma Op.dec (i) : Op (fun _ a=>put a i (a i-1)) := Op.atom i .left lemma Op.bif {f g : Tr} (i) (t : InputSymbol → Bool) (h : Op f) (e : Op g) : Op (fun x a => if t (scan x (a i)) then f x a else g x a) := by obtain ⟨kf,h⟩ := h obtain ⟨kg,e⟩ := e refine ⟨kf+kg, fun r hr => ?_⟩ obtain ⟨p,d,hd,h⟩ := h r (by omega) obtain ⟨q,D,hD,e⟩ := e r (by omega) refine ⟨.bif i t p q,d+D,by omega,fun x a B hb hh hf => ?_⟩ simp only [] split · rename_i htest; obtain ⟨he,he'⟩ := h x a B hb hh hf exact ⟨.yes htest (he.mono (Nat.pow_le_pow_right (by omega) (by omega))),he'⟩ · rename_i htest; obtain ⟨he,he'⟩ := e x a B hb hh hf exact ⟨.no (Bool.eq_false_iff.mpr htest) (he.mono (Nat.pow_le_pow_right (by omega) (by omega))),he'⟩ /-- Iterate transformation while condition true, supplied sequence of finite states proves termination and the two bounds on the trajectory. -/ lemma Op.loop {f g : Tr} (i) (t : InputSymbol → Bool) (h : Op f) (e : ∃ k, ∀ l, k≤l → ∃ d : ℕ, 0 ?_⟩ obtain ⟨p,D,hD,h⟩ := h l (by omega) obtain ⟨d,hd,e⟩ := e l (by omega) refine ⟨.loop i t p,d*D,by positivity,fun x a B hB hh hf => ?_⟩ obtain ⟨n,r,h0,hk,hj,hn,rn⟩ := e x a B hB hh hf have hp : 0 exact .endLoop hn (fit_mono (hk n le_rfl).2 (self_pow (by positivity) hD)) | of_succ j ej ih => obtain ⟨ht,he'⟩ := hj j ej refine .iter ht ?_ ih rw [he']; exact (h x _ (B^d) (le_trans hB hu) (hk j (by omega)).1 (hk j (by omega)).2).1 rw [rn, ← h0, pow_mul] exact ⟨hs 0 n.zero_le,(hk n le_rfl).1⟩ def nz (s : InputSymbol) : Bool := decide (s ≠ .leftMarker) @[simp] lemma cond_nz (x : Word) (i a) : Cmd.cond i nz x a = decide (a i≠0) := by simp [Cmd.cond,nz,scan_is_zero] lemma Op.zero (i : ℕ) : Op (fun _ a=>put a i 0) := by refine Op.loop i nz (Op.dec i) ⟨i+1,fun l hl=>⟨1,by omega,fun x a B hB hh hf => ⟨a i, fun j => put a i (a i-j), by simp, fun j hj=>?_,fun j hj=>?_,by simp,by simp⟩⟩⟩ · exact ⟨put_high0 _ hh (by omega), put_fit _ (by simpa using hf) (by have := hf i; simp; omega)⟩ · simp only [cond_nz, put_self, ne_eq, decide_not, Bool.not_eq_true', decide_eq_false_iff_not, put_over] constructor · omega · congr 1 lemma sum_lt_cube {B a b : ℕ} (hb : 1 put (put a s 0) i (a i+a s)) := by refine Op.loop s nz ((Op.dec s).trans (Op.inc i)) ⟨s+i+1,fun l hl => ⟨2,by omega,fun x a B hB hh hf => ⟨a s,fun j=>put (put a s (a s-j)) i (a i+j),?_,fun j hj=>?_,fun j hj=>?_,?_,by simp⟩⟩⟩ · simp · have hd := self_pow (B:=B) (by omega) (show 0<2 by decide) have hs := hf s exact ⟨put_high0 _ (put_high0 _ hh (by omega)) (by omega), put_fit _ (put_fit _ (fit_mono hf hd) (by omega)) (sum_lt_cube (by omega) (hf _) (by omega))⟩ · have ex : i≠s := Ne.symm e simp only [cond_nz, ne_eq, put_ne _ _ _ _ ex, put_ne _ _ _ _ e, put_self, decide_not, Bool.not_eq_true', decide_eq_false_iff_not] constructor · omega · funext v; by_cases i=v <;> by_cases s=v <;> simp_all [put] <;> omega · simp [Ne.symm e] lemma Op.sendTwo (s i j : ℕ) (e : s≠i) (h : s≠j) (g : i≠j) : Op (fun _ a => put (put (put a s 0) i (a i+a s)) j (a j+a s)) := by refine Op.loop s nz (((Op.dec s).trans (Op.inc i)).trans (Op.inc j)) ⟨s+i+j+1,fun l hl => ⟨2,by omega,fun x a B hB hh hf => ⟨a s,fun t=>put (put (put a s (a s-t)) i (a i+t)) j (a j+t),?_, fun t ht=>?_,fun t ht=>?_,?_,by simp⟩⟩⟩ · funext v; by_cases i=v <;> by_cases s=v <;> by_cases j=v <;> simp_all · have hd := self_pow (B:=B) (by omega) (show 0<2 by decide) have hs := hf s exact ⟨put_high0 _ (put_high0 _ (put_high0 _ hh (by omega)) (by omega)) (by omega), put_fit _ (put_fit _ (put_fit _ (fit_mono hf hd) (by omega)) (sum_lt_cube (by omega) (hf _) (by omega))) (sum_lt_cube (by omega) (hf _) (by omega))⟩ · have es : i≠s := Ne.symm e have hs : j≠s := Ne.symm h have gs : j≠i := Ne.symm g constructor · simp [es, hs]; omega · funext v; by_cases i=v <;> by_cases s=v <;> by_cases j=v <;> simp_all [put] <;> omega · simp [Ne.symm e, Ne.symm h] lemma Op.copy (i j : ℕ) : Op (fun _ a=>put a j (a i)) := by by_cases h : i=j · subst j; simpa using identity refine Op.hide ⟨i+j+1, fun l hl => ⟨_, ((Op.zero j).trans (Op.sendTwo i j l h (by omega) (by omega))).trans (Op.send l i (by omega)),fun x a ha => ?_⟩⟩ refine ⟨?_, put_high0 _ ha (by omega)⟩ have h1 : l≠i := by omega have h2 : l≠j := by omega have ha := ha l le_rfl funext v by_cases i=v <;> by_cases j=v <;> by_cases l=v <;> simp_all [put]; grind end ExactDerandomization.Counter end section /-! Closure layer: symbolic natural-valued expressions evaluable by a polynomial-magnitude counter program. Locality binds the expression to finitely many arguments so scratch registers can be hidden. -/ namespace ExactDerandomization.Counter abbrev NE := Word → Store → ℕ abbrev Agree (l : ℕ) (a b : Store) := ∀ i, i h i (lt_of_lt_of_le hi e) lemma Agree.put {l a b i} (v) (h : Agree l a b) (e : l ≤ i) : Agree l a (Counter.put b i v) := fun j hj => by rw [put_ne _ _ _ j (by omega),h j hj] abbrev Local (e : NE) := ∃ k, ∀ x a b, Agree k a b → e x a = e x b abbrev setE (e : NE) (i : ℕ) : Tr := fun x a => put a i (e x a) def E (e : NE) := Local e ∧ ∀ i, Op (setE e i) lemma E.bound {f : NE} (h : E f) : ∃ d : ℕ, 0 ?_⟩ let r : Store := fun i => if i by simp [r,hi] have hr : High0 r (k+l+1) := fun i hi => by simp [r,show ¬ia i) := ⟨⟨i+1,fun x a b e=>e i (by omega)⟩,Op.copy i⟩ lemma E.succ {f : NE} (h : E f) : E (fun x a=>f x a+1) := by obtain ⟨⟨k,h⟩,hf⟩ := h exact ⟨⟨k,fun x a b he => by simp only [h x _ _ he]⟩,fun i=> by simpa [setE] using (hf i).trans (Op.inc i)⟩ lemma E.pred {f : NE} (h : E f) : E (fun x a=>f x a-1) := by obtain ⟨⟨k,h⟩,hf⟩ := h exact ⟨⟨k,fun x a b he => by simp only [h x _ _ he]⟩,fun i=> by simpa [setE] using (hf i).trans (Op.dec i)⟩ lemma E.const (a : ℕ) : E (fun _ _=>a) := by induction a with | zero => exact ⟨⟨0,fun _ _ _ _=>rfl⟩,Op.zero⟩ | succ a ih => exact E.succ ih lemma put_restore (a : Store) (i j v u : ℕ) (h : i≠j) : put (put (put a i v) j u) i (a i) = put a j u := by rw [put_swap a i j _ _ h,put_over, ← put_ne a j u i (Ne.symm h), put_same] lemma E.bif {g f e : NE} (p : InputSymbol → Bool) (hg : E g) (hf : E f) (he : E e) : E (fun x a=> if p (scan x (g x a)) then f x a else e x a) := by obtain ⟨⟨kG,hg⟩,gp⟩ := hg obtain ⟨⟨kF,hf⟩,fp⟩ := hf obtain ⟨⟨kE,he⟩,ep⟩ := he refine ⟨⟨kG+kE+kF,fun x a b h => by simp only [he x a b (h.mono (by omega)),hf x a b (h.mono (by omega)),hg x a b (h.mono (by omega))]⟩, fun i=>?_⟩ apply Op.hide refine ⟨kE+kF+i+1,fun l hl => ⟨_, ((gp l).trans (Op.bif l p (fp i) (ep i))).trans (Op.zero l),fun x a hh => ?_⟩⟩ refine ⟨?_, put_high0 _ hh (by omega)⟩ simp only [setE, put_self] have hs (k') (hk : k'≤l) : Agree k' a (put a l (g x a)) := Agree.put _ (fun _ _ => rfl) hk rw [← he x _ _ (hs _ (by omega)),← hf x _ _ (hs _ (by omega))] split <;> rw [← hh l le_rfl, put_restore a l i _ _ (by omega)] lemma E.ite {g f e : NE} (hg : E g) (hf : E f) (he : E e) : E (fun x a => if g x a=0 then f x a else e x a) := by simpa [scan_is_zero] using E.bif (fun s=>decide (s=.leftMarker)) hg hf he lemma E.gives_L {f : NE} (h : E f) (A : Language) (e : ∀ x, f x (fun _=>0)≠0 ↔ x∈A) : A ∈ L := by obtain ⟨l,g⟩ := h.2 0 obtain ⟨p,d,_,hp⟩ := g l le_rfl refine Cmd.while_L p 0 d A (fun x=>⟨_, (hp x (fun _=>0) (x.length+2) le_rfl (fun _ _=>rfl) (fun _=>by simp)).1,?_⟩) simpa [setE] using e x /-- Synthetic state trajectory. Like Op.loop, but allows loop valid just between a setup and teardown block, for one requested room. -/ lemma drive {beg step done ans : Tr} (l i : ℕ) (t : InputSymbol → Bool) (hg : Op beg) (hf : Op step) (hj : Op done) (h : ∃ (u d : ℕ), 0 ?_⟩ have hk0 : l ≤ v := by dsimp [v]; omega obtain ⟨n,r,h0,hk,hr,hn,hy,he'⟩ := h x a B he ha heB have hB : 0 exact .endLoop hn (fit_mono (fit_mono (hk n le_rfl).2 (self_pow (by positivity) ej)) hvj) | of_succ j e ih => obtain ⟨ht,ea⟩ := hr j e refine .iter ht ?_ ih rw [ea] exact ((hf x _ (B^d) (le_trans he hu) (hh j (by omega)) (hk j (by omega)).2).1).mono hvf refine ⟨?_,he'⟩ rw [hy] refine .seq ?_ (.seq (heq 0 n.zero_le) ?_) · rw [h0] exact ((hg x a B he (high_mono ha hk0) heB).1).mono (le (by dsimp [N]; omega)) · exact ((hj x _ (B^d) (le_trans he hu) (hh n le_rfl) (hk n le_rfl).2).1).mono hvj /-- Fold counting up. -/ def forNat {α : Type} (f : ℕ → α → α) (z : α) : ℕ → α | 0 => z | k+1 => f k (forNat f z k) lemma E.iterate (f : Word → Store → ℕ → ℕ → ℕ) (n z : NE) (hf : ∀ g j, E g → E j → E (fun x a => f x a (g x a) (j x a))) (hn : E n) (hz : E z) (hloc : ∃ k, ∀ x a b, Agree k a b → f x a=f x b) (hb : ∃ d, 0 forNat (f x a) (z x a) (n x a)) := by have nk := hn.bound obtain ⟨⟨ln,hn⟩,en⟩ := hn obtain ⟨⟨lz,hz⟩,ez⟩ := hz obtain ⟨lf,hl⟩ := hloc let k := ln+lz+lf have hk : ln≤k ∧ lz≤k ∧ lf≤k := by dsimp [k]; omega refine ⟨⟨k,fun x a b e=> by simp only [hn x a b (e.mono hk.1),hz x a b (e.mono hk.2.1),hl x a b (e.mono hk.2.2)]⟩, fun i => ⟨k+i+1, fun l hh=>?_⟩⟩ let g := l let s := l+1 let u := l+2 have ei : i setE n s x (setE z g x a) let loopf : NE := fun x a=> f x a (a u) (a g) let next : Tr := fun x a=> let r := setE loopf g x a let t := put r u (r u+1) put t s (t s-1) let done : Tr := fun _ a=> put (put (put a i (a g)) g 0) u 0 refine drive (beg:=start) (step:=next) (done:=done) l s nz ((ez g).trans (en s)) ((((hf _ _ (E.var u) (E.var g)).2 g).trans (Op.inc u)).trans (Op.dec s)) (((Op.copy g i).trans (Op.zero g)).trans (Op.zero u)) ?_ obtain ⟨dn,hdn,nb⟩ := nk obtain ⟨dj,hdj,hb⟩ := hb refine ⟨l+3,dn+dj,by omega,fun x a B he ha hfit=>?_⟩ let v := n x a let w := forNat (f x a) (z x a) let r (j) := put (put (put a g (w j)) s (v-j)) u j have es : g≠s := by omega have eg : g≠u := by omega have eus : s≠u := by omega have heq (j) : Agree k a (r j) := Agree.put _ (Agree.put _ (Agree.put _ (fun _ _=>rfl) (by omega)) (by omega)) (by omega) have hag := ha g (by omega) have has := ha s (by omega) have hau := ha u (by omega) have hr0 (j) : r j g = w j := by simp [r,Ne.symm es,Ne.symm eg] have hr1 (j) : r j s = v-j := by simp [r,Ne.symm eus] have hr2 (j) : r j u = j := by simp [r] refine ⟨v,r,?_,fun j h=>?_,fun j h=>?_,by simp [cond_nz,hr1],?_, put_high0 _ ha ei⟩ · have H := hn x a (put a g (z x a)) (Agree.put _ (fun _ _=>rfl) (by omega)) dsimp only [start,r,w,forNat,setE] rw [← H] funext j by_cases u=j · subst j; simp [put,hau,eus,eg] · rename_i e; simp [put,e,v] · have hB : 0v+1) a b = a+b := by induction b <;> simp_all [forNat, Nat.add_assoc] lemma subIter (a b : ℕ) : forNat (fun _ v=>v-1) a b = a-b := by induction b <;> simp_all [forNat, Nat.sub_sub] lemma mulIter (a b : ℕ) : forNat (fun _ v=>v+a) 0 b = a*b := by induction b <;> simp_all [forNat, Nat.mul_add] variable {f g m r : NE} lemma add (h : E f) (e : E g) : E (fun x a=> f x a + g x a) := by have H := E.iterate (fun _ _ _ v=>v+1) g f (fun _ _ _ e=> e.succ) e h ⟨0,fun _ _ _ _=>rfl⟩ (by obtain ⟨d,hd,h⟩ := h.bound; obtain ⟨D,hD,e⟩ := e.bound refine ⟨d+D+1,by omega,fun x a B hB ha j hj => ?_⟩ rw [addIter] exact plus_sum (h _ _ _ hB ha) (e _ _ _ hB ha) le_rfl hj (by omega)) simpa only [addIter] using H lemma sub (h : E f) (e : E g) : E (fun x a=> f x a - g x a) := by have H := E.iterate (fun _ _ _ v=>v-1) g f (fun _ _ _ e=> e.pred) e h ⟨0,fun _ _ _ _=>rfl⟩ (by obtain ⟨d,hd,h⟩ := h.bound refine ⟨d,hd,fun x a B hB ha j hj => ?_⟩ rw [subIter] exact lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.sub_le _ _) (h _ _ _ hB ha)) simpa only [subIter] using H lemma mul (h : E f) (e : E g) : E (fun x a=> f x a * g x a) := by have H := E.iterate (fun x a _ v=>v+f x a) g (fun _ _=>0) (fun _ _ _ t=>t.add h) e (E.const 0) (by obtain ⟨k,h⟩ := h.1 exact ⟨k,fun x a b hab=> by simp only [h x a b hab]⟩) (by obtain ⟨d,hd,h⟩ := h.bound; obtain ⟨D,hD,e⟩ := e.bound refine ⟨d+D,by omega,fun x a B hB ha j hj => ?_⟩ simp only [mulIter,pow_add] have hh := e _ _ _ hB ha exact Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt (h x a B hB ha) (lt_of_le_of_lt hj hh)) simpa only [mulIter] using H lemma pow_const (h : E f) (d : ℕ) : E (fun x a=> (f x a)^d) := by induction d with | zero => simpa using E.const 1 | succ d e => simpa [pow_succ] using E.mul e h lemma ite_le (h : E f) (e : E g) (s : E m) (t : E r) : E (fun x a => if f x a ≤ g x a then m x a else r x a) := by simpa only [Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le] using (h.sub e).ite s t lemma ite_lt (h : E f) (e : E g) (s : E m) (t : E r) : E (fun x a => if f x a < g x a then m x a else r x a) := ite_le (h.succ) e s t lemma minE (h : E f) (e : E g) : E (fun x a => min (f x a) (g x a)) := by simpa only [min_def] using ite_le h e h e lemma scan_right (x : Word) (m : ℕ) : scan x m = .rightMarker ↔ x.length < m := by unfold scan split <;> simp <;> omega lemma length : E (fun x _ => x.length) := by let f (i) : Tr := fun x a => put a i (max (a i) (x.length+1)) have hs (i : ℕ) : Op (f i) := by let t := fun s : InputSymbol => decide (s≠.rightMarker) apply Op.loop i t (Op.inc i) refine ⟨i+1,fun l hl=>⟨1,by decide,fun x a B hB hh hf=> ?_⟩⟩ refine ⟨x.length+1-a i, fun j=>put a i (a i+j),by simp,fun j hj=>?_, fun j hj=>?_,?_,?_⟩ · exact ⟨put_high0 _ hh (by omega),put_fit _ (by simpa using hf) (by have := hf i; simp; omega)⟩ · simp [Cmd.cond,t,scan_right,Nat.add_assoc]; omega · simp [Cmd.cond,t,scan_right]; omega · dsimp [f]; congr 1; omega refine ⟨⟨0,fun _ _ _ _=>rfl⟩,fun i=>?_⟩ simpa [setE,f] using (((Op.zero i).trans (hs i)).trans (Op.dec i)) lemma ite_eq (h : E f) (e : E g) (s : E m) (t : E r) : E (fun x a => if f x a = g x a then m x a else r x a) := by have H := ite_le h e (ite_le e h s t) t convert H using 1 ext x a grind lemma powStep (a b c : ℕ) : forNat (fun _ v=> min c (v*a)) (min c 1) b = min c (a^b) := by induction b with | zero => simp [forNat] | succ b ih => simp only [forNat, ih, pow_succ] by_cases h : c ≤ a^b · rw [min_eq_left h] match a with | 0 => simp | a+1 => have e : c ≤ c*(a+1) := by nlinarith have g : c ≤ (a+1)^b*(a+1) := le_trans e (Nat.mul_le_mul_right (a+1) h) simp [e,g] · rw [min_eq_right (show a^b≤c by omega)] lemma capPow (h : E f) (e : E g) (s : E m) : E (fun x a => min (m x a) ((f x a)^(g x a))) := by have H := E.iterate (fun x a _ v=>min (m x a) (v*f x a)) g (fun x a=> min (m x a) 1) (fun _ _ _ u=>s.minE (u.mul h)) e (s.minE (E.const 1)) (by obtain ⟨k,h⟩ := h.1; obtain ⟨l,s⟩ := s.1 exact ⟨k+l,fun x a b e=> by simp only [h x a b (e.mono (by omega)),s x a b (e.mono (by omega))]⟩) (by obtain ⟨d,hd,s⟩ := s.bound refine ⟨d,hd,fun x a B hB ha j _=>?_⟩ simpa only [powStep] using lt_of_le_of_lt (min_le_left (m x a) ((f x a)^j)) (s x a B hB ha)) simpa only [powStep] using H lemma searchDiv (a b n : ℕ) : forNat (fun j v=> if b=0 then 0 else if (j+1)*b≤a then j+1 else v) 0 n = min n (a/b) := by induction n with | zero => simp [forNat] | succ n ih => simp only [forNat,ih] by_cases h : b=0 · simp [h] rw [ite_eq_right h] have H := Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le (x:=n+1) (y:=a) (show 0 omega lemma div (h : E f) (e : E g) : E (fun x a=> f x a / g x a) := by let q x a (j v : ℕ) := if g x a = 0 then 0 else if (j+1)*g x a ≤ f x a then j+1 else v have H := E.iterate q f (fun _ _=>0) (fun _ _ j v=>e.ite (E.const 0) (((j.succ).mul e).ite_le h j.succ v)) h (E.const 0) (by obtain ⟨k,h⟩ := h.1; obtain ⟨l,e⟩ := e.1 exact ⟨k+l,fun x a b t=> by simp only [q,h x a b (t.mono (by omega)),e x a b (t.mono (by omega))]⟩) (by obtain ⟨d,hd,h⟩ := h.bound refine ⟨d,hd,fun x a B hB ha j hj=>?_⟩ simp only [q,searchDiv] exact lt_of_le_of_lt (le_trans (min_le_left _ _) hj) (h _ _ _ hB ha)) simpa only [q, searchDiv, min_eq_right (Nat.div_le_self ..)] using H lemma mod (h : E f) (e : E g) : E (fun x a=> f x a % g x a) := by convert h.sub (e.mul (h.div e)) using 1 ext x a have H := Nat.mod_add_div (f x a) (g x a); omega end E end ExactDerandomization.Counter end section namespace ExactDerandomization.Counter variable {S T : Type} def Pick (f : Word → Store → S) : Prop := ∀ g : S → NE, (∀ s, E (g s)) → E (fun x a=> g (f x a) x a) lemma Pick.const (s : S) : Pick (fun _ _=>s) := fun _ h=> h s lemma Pick.bind {f : Word → Store → S} {g : S → Word → Store → T} (h : Pick f) (e : ∀ s, Pick (g s)) : Pick (fun x a=> g (f x a) x a) := fun _ hk=> h _ (fun s=>e s _ hk) lemma Pick.map {f : Word → Store → S} (h : Pick f) (g : S → T) : Pick (fun x a=> g (f x a)) := h.bind (g:=fun s _ _=>g s) (fun _=>Pick.const _) lemma Pick.ite {f : Word → Store → Bool} (h : Pick f) {s t : NE} (e : E s) (g : E t) : E (fun x a=> if f x a then s x a else t x a) := by apply h (fun b x a=> if b then s x a else t x a); intro b cases b · simpa using g · simpa using e lemma Pick.cond {f : Word → Store → Bool} (h : Pick f) {s t : Word → Store → S} (e : Pick s) (g : Pick t) : Pick (fun x a=> if f x a then s x a else t x a) := by apply h.bind (g:=fun b x a=> if b then s x a else t x a); intro b cases b · simpa using g · simpa using e lemma Pick.test_lt {f g : NE} (e : E f) (h : E g) : Pick (fun x a=> decide (f x a simp [he] lemma Pick.test_eq {f g : NE} (e : E f) (h : E g) : Pick (fun x a=> decide (f x a=g x a)) := by intro s H convert e.ite_eq h (H true) (H false) using 1 ext x a by_cases f x a=g x a <;> simp_all lemma Pick.and {s t : Word → Store → Bool} (e : Pick s) (h : Pick t) : Pick (fun x a=> s x a && t x a) := by refine e.bind (g:=fun b x a=> b && t x a) (fun b=> h.map (fun u=> b&&u)) lemma Pick.tuple {n} {f : Word → Store → Fin n → S} (h : ∀ i, Pick (fun x a=> f x a i)) : Pick f := by induction n with | zero => intro g hg convert hg (fun i=>Fin.elim0 i) using 1 ext x a; congr 2; exact funext (fun i=>Fin.elim0 i) | succ n ih => let p := fun x a (i : Fin n)=> f x a i.succ have hp : Pick p := ih (fun i=>h i.succ) convert (h 0).bind (g:=fun s x a=> Fin.cons (α:=fun _ : Fin (n+1) => S) s (p x a)) (fun s => hp.map (fun g : Fin n → S => Fin.cons (α:=fun _ : Fin (n+1) => S) s g)) using 1 ext x a i refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp [p] lemma Pick.pos {n} {f : Word → Store → Fin n} (e : E fun x a => (f x a).val) : Pick f := by classical intro g hg have aux (s : Finset (Fin n)) : E (fun x a=> if f x a ∈ s then g (f x a) x a else 0) := by induction s using Finset.induction_on with | empty => simpa using E.const 0 | @insert b s h H => convert e.ite_eq (E.const b.val) (hg b) H using 1 ext x a by_cases f x a=b <;> simp_all; grind simpa using aux .univ lemma Pick.read {f : NE} (h : E f) : Pick (fun x a=>scan x (f x a)) := by intro g e let u := InputSymbol.leftMarker let v := InputSymbol.rightMarker let b := InputSymbol.bit have hz (s : InputSymbol) {i j : NE} (e : E i) (k : E j) := h.bif (fun x=>decide (x=s)) e k have H := hz u (e u) (hz v (e v) (hz (b false) (e (b false)) (e (b true)))) convert H using 1 ext x a cases he : scan x (f x a) with | leftMarker => simp [he,u] | rightMarker => simp [he,u,v] | bit i => cases i <;> simp [he,u,v,b] lemma Pick.all {n} (p : Word → Store → Fin n → Prop) [(x : Word) → (a : Store) → DecidablePred (p x a)] (h : ∀ i, Pick (fun x a=> decide (p x a i))) : Pick (fun x a=> decide (∀ i, p x a i)) := by let f (x a) (i : Fin n) := decide (p x a i) have hf : Pick f := Pick.tuple h convert hf.map (fun l=> decide (∀ i, l i=true)) using 1 ext x a simp [f] end ExactDerandomization.Counter end end OAI