import OAI.Computability.WitnessedChoice.CountingTransfer namespace OAI namespace WitnessedSeparation.Interpretations noncomputable section open Classical Counting HFCoding Hereditary variable {ι R T L : Type} {A : ι → Type} {d : ∀ i, Set (HF (A i))} variable (S : ι → Structure R) (C : ∀ i, Counting.Structure L (Domain (d i))) variable (e : ∀ i, (S i).Carrier → Domain (d i)) (he : ∀ i, Function.Injective (e i)) variable {m B : ℕ} (I : Interpretation R T) def EncodedDomain : ∀ i, (Fin 2 → Domain (d i)) → Prop := fun i v => ∃ p : I.Domain (S i), v 0 = e i p.val.1 ∧ v 1 = e i p.val.2 def EncodedLink : ∀ i, (Fin 4 → Domain (d i)) → Prop := fun i v => ∃ p q : I.Domain (S i), v 0 = e i p.val.1 ∧ v 1 = e i p.val.2 ∧ v 2 = e i q.val.1 ∧ v 3 = e i q.val.2 ∧ Reachability.Link (I.link (S i)) p q def EncodedClass : ∀ i, (Fin 4 → Domain (d i)) → Prop := fun i v => ∃ p q : I.Domain (S i), v 0 = e i p.val.1 ∧ v 1 = e i p.val.2 ∧ v 2 = e i q.val.1 ∧ v 3 = e i q.val.2 ∧ Quotient.mk (I.classSetoid (S i)) p = Quotient.mk _ q variable (U : ∀ i, Domain (d i) → Prop) (hU : ∀ i x, U i x ↔ ∃ a, e i a = x) variable (hdu : UniformDefinable C m 1 (fun i v => U i (v 0))) variable (δ : ∀ i, (Fin 2 → Domain (d i)) → Prop) (hdδ : UniformDefinable C m 2 δ) variable (hδ : ∀ i v, δ i (e i ∘ v) ↔ I.domain.eval (S i) v) include hU hdu hdδ hδ theorem uniform_domain : UniformDefinable C m 2 (EncodedDomain S e I) := by have h₁ : UniformDefinable C m 2 (fun i v => U i (v 0)) := by simpa using hdu.reindex (![0] : Fin 1 → Fin 2) have h₂ : UniformDefinable C m 2 (fun i v => U i (v 1)) := by simpa using hdu.reindex (![1] : Fin 1 → Fin 2) apply (h₁.and (h₂.and hdδ)).congr intro i v constructor · rintro ⟨h₁,h₂,hv⟩ obtain ⟨a,ha⟩ := (hU i (v 0)).mp h₁ obtain ⟨b,hb⟩ := (hU i (v 1)).mp h₂ have hvv : e i ∘ ![a,b] = v := by ext k; fin_cases k <;> simp [ha,hb] exact ⟨⟨(a,b),(hδ i _).mp (by rw [hvv]; exact hv)⟩,ha.symm,hb.symm⟩ · rintro ⟨p,h₁,h₂⟩ have hvv : e i ∘ ![p.val.1,p.val.2] = v := by ext k; fin_cases k <;> simp [h₁,h₂] refine ⟨(hU i _).mpr ⟨p.val.1,h₁.symm⟩,(hU i _).mpr ⟨p.val.2,h₂.symm⟩,?_⟩ rw [← hvv] exact (hδ i _).mpr p.property omit hU hdu hdδ hδ variable (hdom : UniformDefinable C m 2 (EncodedDomain S e I)) variable (η : ∀ i, (Fin 4 → Domain (d i)) → Prop) (hdη : UniformDefinable C m 4 η) variable (hη : ∀ i v, η i (e i ∘ v) ↔ I.identify.eval (S i) v) include he hdom hdη hη theorem uniform_link : UniformDefinable C m 4 (EncodedLink S e I) := by have h₁ := hdom.reindex (![0,1] : Fin 2 → Fin 4) have h₂ := hdom.reindex (![2,3] : Fin 2 → Fin 4) have heq : UniformDefinable C m 4 (fun _ v => v 0 = v 2 ∧ v 1 = v 3) := (UniformDefinable.equal 0 2).and (UniformDefinable.equal 1 3) have ht := hdη.reindex (![2,3,0,1] : Fin 4 → Fin 4) apply (h₁.and (h₂.and (heq.or (hdη.or ht)))).congr intro i v constructor · rintro ⟨⟨p,hp₁,hp₂⟩,⟨q,hq₁,hq₂⟩,hr⟩ refine ⟨p,q,hp₁,hp₂,hq₁,hq₂,?_⟩ rcases hr with ⟨he₁,he₂⟩ | hr | hr · exact Or.inl (Subtype.ext (Prod.ext (he i (hp₁.symm.trans (he₁.trans hq₁))) (he i (hp₂.symm.trans (he₂.trans hq₂))))) · have hvv : e i ∘ ![p.val.1,p.val.2,q.val.1,q.val.2] = v := by funext k; fin_cases k · exact hp₁.symm · exact hp₂.symm · exact hq₁.symm · exact hq₂.symm exact Or.inr (Or.inl ((hη i _).mp (by rw [hvv]; exact hr))) · have hvv : e i ∘ ![q.val.1,q.val.2,p.val.1,p.val.2] = v ∘ ![2,3,0,1] := by funext k; fin_cases k · exact hq₁.symm · exact hq₂.symm · exact hp₁.symm · exact hp₂.symm exact Or.inr (Or.inr ((hη i _).mp (by rw [hvv]; exact hr))) · rintro ⟨p,q,hp₁,hp₂,hq₁,hq₂,hr⟩ refine ⟨⟨p,hp₁,hp₂⟩,⟨q,hq₁,hq₂⟩,?_⟩ rcases hr with rfl | hr | hr · exact Or.inl ⟨hp₁.trans hq₁.symm,hp₂.trans hq₂.symm⟩ · have hvv : e i ∘ ![p.val.1,p.val.2,q.val.1,q.val.2] = v := by funext k; fin_cases k · exact hp₁.symm · exact hp₂.symm · exact hq₁.symm · exact hq₂.symm exact Or.inr (Or.inl (by rw [← hvv]; exact (hη i _).mpr hr)) · have hvv : e i ∘ ![q.val.1,q.val.2,p.val.1,p.val.2] = v ∘ ![2,3,0,1] := by funext k; fin_cases k · exact hq₁.symm · exact hq₂.symm · exact hp₁.symm · exact hp₂.symm exact Or.inr (Or.inr (by rw [← hvv]; exact (hη i _).mpr hr)) omit hdom hdη hη variable (hlink : UniformDefinable C m 4 (EncodedLink S e I)) include hlink theorem uniform_class (hm : 6 ≤ m) (hB : ∀ i, Nat.card (S i).Carrier ≤ B) : UniformDefinable C m 4 (EncodedClass S e I) := by apply (Counting.uniform_pairReach C (EncodedLink S e I) hlink hm (B^2)).congr intro i v have hinj : Function.Injective (fun p : I.Domain (S i) => (e i p.val.1,e i p.val.2)) := by intro p q hpq exact Subtype.ext (Prod.ext (he i (congrArg Prod.fst hpq)) (he i (congrArg Prod.snd hpq))) have hc : Fintype.card (I.Domain (S i)) ≤ B^2 := by apply le_trans (Fintype.card_subtype_le _) rw [Fintype.card_prod,← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card] simpa only [pow_two] using Nat.mul_self_le_mul_self (hB i) have h := Counting.pairReach_eqv (I.Domain (S i)) (I.link (S i)) (fun p => e i p.val.1) (fun p => e i p.val.2) hinj (EncodedLink S e I i) (fun _ => Iff.rfl) (B^2) hc v have heq : PairReach (EncodedLink S e I) (B^2) i v = PairReach (fun _ : Unit => EncodedLink S e I i) (B^2) () v := by clear h generalize B^2 = t induction t generalizing v with | zero => rfl | succ t ih => simp only [PairReach,ih] rw [heq,h] unfold EncodedClass apply exists_congr intro p apply exists_congr intro q refine and_congr_right (fun _ => and_congr_right (fun _ => and_congr_right (fun _ => and_congr_right (fun _ => ?_)))) change (I.classSetoid (S i)).r p q ↔ _ exact Quotient.eq.symm end noncomputable section open Classical Counting HFCoding Hereditary variable {ι R T L : Type} {A : ι → Type} {d : ∀ i, Set (HF (A i))} variable (S : ι → Structure R) (C : ∀ i, Counting.Structure L (Domain (d i))) variable (e : ∀ i, (S i).Carrier → Domain (d i)) (he : ∀ i, Function.Injective (e i)) variable {m : ℕ} (I : Interpretation R T) def EncodedPayload : ∀ i, (Fin 3 → Domain (d i)) → Prop := fun i v => ∃ p : I.Domain (S i), v 1 = e i p.val.1 ∧ v 2 = e i p.val.2 ∧ (v 0).val = payload I (S i) (Subtype.val ∘ e i) (Quotient.mk _ p) def EncodedRep (j : ℕ) : ∀ i, (Fin 3 → Domain (d i)) → Prop := fun i v => ∃ p : I.Domain (S i), v 1 = e i p.val.1 ∧ v 2 = e i p.val.2 ∧ (v 0).val = vertexCode I (S i) (Subtype.val ∘ e i) j (Quotient.mk _ p) variable (hd : ∀ i, ∀ x ∈ d i, ∀ y, y ∈ x → y ∈ d i) variable (hmem : UniformDefinable C m 2 (fun _ v => (v 0).val ∈ (v 1).val)) variable (hset : UniformDefinable C m 1 (fun _ v => isSet (v 0).val = true)) variable (hm : 6 ≤ m) variable (hdom : UniformDefinable C m 2 (EncodedDomain S e I)) variable (hclass : UniformDefinable C m 4 (EncodedClass S e I)) variable (hpairs : ∀ i (p : I.Domain (S i)), pair (e i p.val.1).val (e i p.val.2).val ∈ d i) include he hd hmem hset hm hdom hclass hpairs theorem uniform_payload : UniformDefinable C m 3 (EncodedPayload S e I) := by have hc := hclass.reindex (![4,5,1,0] : Fin 4 → Fin 6) have hp := (HFCoding.uniform_pair C hmem hset hm hd).reindex (![2,1,0] : Fin 3 → Fin 6) have hr := ((hc.and hp).ex (by omega)).ex (by omega) have hmem' := hmem.reindex (![0,1] : Fin 2 → Fin 4) have hall := (hmem'.iff hr).all (by omega) have hs := hset.reindex (![0] : Fin 1 → Fin 3) have hdo := hdom.reindex (![1,2] : Fin 2 → Fin 3) apply (hs.and (hdo.and hall)).congr intro i v change (isSet (v 0).val = true ∧ EncodedDomain S e I i ![v 1,v 2] ∧ ∀ z : Domain (d i), z.val ∈ (v 0).val ↔ ∃ b₁ b₂ : Domain (d i), EncodedClass S e I i ![v 1,v 2,b₁,b₂] ∧ z.val = pair b₁.val b₂.val) ↔ _ constructor · rintro ⟨hs,⟨p,hp₁,hp₂⟩,h⟩ refine ⟨p,hp₁,hp₂,?_⟩ apply ext_sets hs (isSet_ofFinset _) intro z change z ∈ (v 0).val ↔ z ∈ payload I (S i) (Subtype.val ∘ e i) (Quotient.mk _ p) rw [mem_payload] constructor · intro hz obtain ⟨b₁,b₂,⟨p',q,hp'₁,hp'₂,hq₁,hq₂,hpq⟩,hzq⟩ := (h ⟨z,hd i _ (v 0).property _ hz⟩).mp hz have hpp : p = p' := Subtype.ext (Prod.ext (he i (hp₁.symm.trans hp'₁)) (he i (hp₂.symm.trans hp'₂))) subst p' change b₁ = e i q.val.1 at hq₁ change b₂ = e i q.val.2 at hq₂ exact ⟨q,hpq.symm,by simpa only [hq₁,hq₂,Function.comp_apply] using hzq⟩ · rintro ⟨q,hqp,rfl⟩ have hz := hpairs i q exact (h ⟨_,hz⟩).mpr ⟨e i q.val.1,e i q.val.2, ⟨p,q,hp₁,hp₂,rfl,rfl,hqp.symm⟩,rfl⟩ · rintro ⟨p,hp₁,hp₂,hv⟩ refine ⟨by rw [hv]; exact isSet_ofFinset _,⟨p,hp₁,hp₂⟩,?_⟩ intro z rw [hv,mem_payload] constructor · rintro ⟨q,hqp,hzq⟩ exact ⟨e i q.val.1,e i q.val.2,⟨p,q,hp₁,hp₂,rfl,rfl,hqp.symm⟩,hzq⟩ · rintro ⟨b₁,b₂,⟨p',q,hp'₁,hp'₂,hq₁,hq₂,hpq⟩,hzq⟩ have hpp : p = p' := Subtype.ext (Prod.ext (he i (hp₁.symm.trans hp'₁)) (he i (hp₂.symm.trans hp'₂))) subst p' change b₁ = e i q.val.1 at hq₁ change b₂ = e i q.val.2 at hq₂ exact ⟨q,hpq.symm,by simpa only [hq₁,hq₂,Function.comp_apply] using hzq⟩ end noncomputable section open Classical Counting HFCoding Hereditary variable {ι R T L : Type} {A : ι → Type} {d : ∀ i, Set (HF (A i))} variable (S : ι → Structure R) (C : ∀ i, Counting.Structure L (Domain (d i))) variable (e : ∀ i, (S i).Carrier → Domain (d i)) variable {m : ℕ} (I : Interpretation R T) variable (hd : ∀ i, ∀ x ∈ d i, ∀ y, y ∈ x → y ∈ d i) variable (hmem : UniformDefinable C m 2 (fun _ v => (v 0).val ∈ (v 1).val)) variable (hset : UniformDefinable C m 1 (fun _ v => isSet (v 0).val = true)) variable (hm : 6 ≤ m) (hpure : ∀ i k, ordinal (A := A i) k ∈ d i) variable (hpayload : UniformDefinable C m 3 (EncodedPayload S e I)) include hd hmem hset hm hpure hpayload theorem uniform_rep (j : ℕ) : UniformDefinable C m 3 (EncodedRep S e I j) := by have ho := (HFCoding.uniform_ordinal C hmem hset hm hd hpure j).reindex (![1] : Fin 1 → Fin 5) have hs := hpayload.reindex (![0,3,4] : Fin 3 → Fin 5) have hp := (HFCoding.uniform_pair C hmem hset hm hd).reindex (![2,1,0] : Fin 3 → Fin 5) apply (((ho.and (hs.and hp)).ex (by omega)).ex (by omega)).congr intro i v change (∃ o S' : Domain (d i), o.val = ordinal j ∧ EncodedPayload S e I i ![S',v 1,v 2] ∧ (v 0).val = pair o.val S'.val) ↔ _ constructor · rintro ⟨o,S',ho,⟨p,hp₁,hp₂,hS⟩,hx⟩ change S'.val = payload I (S i) (Subtype.val ∘ e i) (Quotient.mk _ p) at hS exact ⟨p,hp₁,hp₂,by simpa only [vertexCode,ho,hS] using hx⟩ · rintro ⟨p,hp₁,hp₂,hx⟩ let pl := payload I (S i) (Subtype.val ∘ e i) (Quotient.mk _ p) have hp : pl ∈ d i := by have hdbl : double (ordinal j) pl ∈ d i := hd i _ (v 0).property _ (by rw [hx]; simp [vertexCode,pair,pl]) exact hd i _ hdbl _ (by simp) exact ⟨⟨ordinal j,hpure i j⟩,⟨pl,hp⟩,rfl,⟨p,hp₁,hp₂,rfl⟩,hx⟩ omit hd hmem hset hpure hpayload variable (j : ℕ) (hrep : UniformDefinable C m 3 (EncodedRep S e I j)) include hrep def EncodedUniverse : ∀ i, (Fin 1 → Domain (d i)) → Prop := fun i v => ∃ x : I.Vertex (S i), (v 0).val = vertexCode I (S i) (Subtype.val ∘ e i) j x theorem uniform_universe : UniformDefinable C m 1 (EncodedUniverse S e I j) := by have hr := hrep.reindex (![2,1,0] : Fin 3 → Fin 3) apply ((hr.ex (by omega)).ex (by omega)).congr intro i v change (∃ a b, EncodedRep S e I j i ![v 0,a,b]) ↔ _ constructor · rintro ⟨a,b,p,_,_,hx⟩ exact ⟨Quotient.mk _ p,hx⟩ · rintro ⟨x,hx⟩ obtain ⟨p,rfl⟩ := Quotient.exists_rep x exact ⟨e i p.val.1,e i p.val.2,p,rfl,rfl,hx⟩ def EncodedStateRelation (r : T) : ∀ i, (Fin 2 → Domain (d i)) → Prop := fun i v => ∃ x y : I.Vertex (S i), (v 0).val = vertexCode I (S i) (Subtype.val ∘ e i) j x ∧ (v 1).val = vertexCode I (S i) (Subtype.val ∘ e i) j y ∧ (I.apply (S i)).rel r x y = true variable (ρ : ∀ i, (Fin 4 → Domain (d i)) → Prop) variable (hdρ : UniformDefinable C m 4 ρ) include hdρ theorem uniform_stateRelation (r : T) (hρ : ∀ i v, ρ i (e i ∘ v) ↔ (I.relation r).eval (S i) v) : UniformDefinable C m 2 (EncodedStateRelation S e I j r) := by have hx := hrep.reindex (![4,3,2] : Fin 3 → Fin 6) have hy := hrep.reindex (![5,1,0] : Fin 3 → Fin 6) have hr := hdρ.reindex (![3,2,1,0] : Fin 4 → Fin 6) apply (((((hx.and (hy.and hr)).ex (by omega)).ex (by omega)).ex (by omega)).ex (by omega)).congr intro i v have hvec (a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : Domain (d i)) : Fin.cons b₂ (Fin.cons b₁ (Fin.cons a₂ (Fin.cons a₁ v))) ∘ ![3,2,1,0] = ![a₁,a₂,b₁,b₂] := by funext k; fin_cases k <;> rfl simp only [hvec] change (∃ a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂, EncodedRep S e I j i ![v 0,a₁,a₂] ∧ EncodedRep S e I j i ![v 1,b₁,b₂] ∧ ρ i ![a₁,a₂,b₁,b₂]) ↔ _ constructor · rintro ⟨a₁,a₂,b₁,b₂,⟨p,hp₁,hp₂,hx⟩,⟨q,hq₁,hq₂,hy⟩,hr⟩ refine ⟨Quotient.mk _ p,Quotient.mk _ q,hx,hy,?_⟩ simp only [Interpretation.apply,decide_eq_true_eq] refine ⟨p,q,rfl,rfl,?_⟩ have hvv : e i ∘ ![p.val.1,p.val.2,q.val.1,q.val.2] = ![a₁,a₂,b₁,b₂] := by funext k; fin_cases k · exact hp₁.symm · exact hp₂.symm · exact hq₁.symm · exact hq₂.symm exact (hρ i _).mp (by rw [hvv]; exact hr) · rintro ⟨x,y,hx,hy,hxy⟩ simp only [Interpretation.apply,decide_eq_true_eq] at hxy obtain ⟨p,q,hp,hq,hr⟩ := hxy refine ⟨e i p.val.1,e i p.val.2,e i q.val.1,e i q.val.2, ⟨p,rfl,rfl,by change (v 0).val = _; rw [hp]; exact hx⟩, ⟨q,rfl,rfl,by change (v 1).val = _; rw [hq]; exact hy⟩,?_⟩ have hvv : e i ∘ ![p.val.1,p.val.2,q.val.1,q.val.2] = ![e i p.val.1,e i p.val.2,e i q.val.1,e i q.val.2] := by funext k; fin_cases k <;> rfl rw [← hvv] exact (hρ i _).mpr hr end noncomputable section open Classical Counting HFCoding Hereditary variable {ι R T L : Type} {D : ι → Type} variable (S : ι → Structure R) (C : ∀ i, Counting.Structure L (D i)) variable (e : ∀ i, (S i).Carrier → D i) {m B : ℕ} structure StateDefinable (m : ℕ) : Prop where domainDef : UniformDefinable C m 1 (fun i v => ∃ a, e i a = v 0) relations : ∀ r, UniformDefinable C m 2 (fun i v => ∃ a b, e i a = v 0 ∧ e i b = v 1 ∧ (S i).rel r a b = true) theorem StateDefinable.translate (h : StateDefinable S C e m) (he : ∀ i, Function.Injective (e i)) (hB : ∀ i, Nat.card (S i).Carrier ≤ B) {k : ℕ} (φ : Formula R k) (hw : φ.scopedWidth < m) : ∃ Q : ∀ i, (Fin k → D i) → Prop, UniformDefinable C m k Q ∧ ∀ i v, Q i (e i ∘ v) ↔ φ.eval (S i) v := by apply uniform_translate S C e he (fun i x => ∃ a, e i a = x) (fun _ _ => Iff.rfl) (fun r i x y => ∃ a b, e i a = x ∧ e i b = y ∧ (S i).rel r a b = true) _ h.domainDef h.relations hB φ hw intro r i a b constructor · rintro ⟨a',b',ha,hb,hr⟩ simpa only [he i ha,he i hb] using hr · exact fun hr => ⟨a,b,rfl,rfl,hr⟩ variable {A : ι → Type} {d : ∀ i, Set (HF (A i))} variable (H : ∀ i, Counting.Structure L (Domain (d i))) variable (f : ∀ i, (S i).Carrier → Domain (d i)) (hf : ∀ i, Function.Injective (f i)) variable (I : Interpretation R T) (j : ℕ) variable (hc : ∀ i x, vertexCode I (S i) (Subtype.val ∘ f i) j x ∈ d i) def nextCode (i : ι) (x : (I.apply (S i)).Carrier) : Domain (d i) := ⟨vertexCode I (S i) (Subtype.val ∘ f i) j x,hc i x⟩ include hf in theorem nextCode_injective (i : ι) : Function.Injective (nextCode S f I j hc i) := by intro x y hxy exact vertexCode_injective I (S i) (Subtype.val ∘ f i) (Subtype.val_injective.comp (hf i)) j (congrArg Subtype.val hxy) include hf theorem StateDefinable.apply (h : StateDefinable S H f m) (hd : ∀ i, ∀ x ∈ d i, ∀ y, y ∈ x → y ∈ d i) (hmem : UniformDefinable H m 2 (fun _ v => (v 0).val ∈ (v 1).val)) (hset : UniformDefinable H m 1 (fun _ v => isSet (v 0).val = true)) (hm : 6 ≤ m) (hpure : ∀ i k, ordinal (A := A i) k ∈ d i) (hpairs : ∀ i (p : I.Domain (S i)), pair (f i p.val.1).val (f i p.val.2).val ∈ d i) (hB : ∀ i, Nat.card (S i).Carrier ≤ B) (hwδ : I.domain.scopedWidth < m) (hwη : I.identify.scopedWidth < m) (hwρ : ∀ r, (I.relation r).scopedWidth < m) : StateDefinable (fun i => I.apply (S i)) H (nextCode S f I j hc) m := by obtain ⟨δ,hdδ,hδ⟩ := h.translate S H f hf hB I.domain hwδ obtain ⟨η,hdη,hη⟩ := h.translate S H f hf hB I.identify hwη have hdom := uniform_domain S H f I (fun i x => ∃ a, f i a = x) (fun _ _ => Iff.rfl) h.domainDef δ hdδ hδ have hlink := uniform_link S H f hf I hdom η hdη hη have hclass := uniform_class S H f hf I hlink hm hB have hpay := uniform_payload S H f hf I hd hmem hset hm hdom hclass hpairs have hrep := uniform_rep S H f I hd hmem hset hm hpure hpay j constructor · apply (uniform_universe S H f I hm j hrep).congr intro i v exact exists_congr (fun x => ⟨fun h => Subtype.ext h.symm,fun h => (congrArg Subtype.val h).symm⟩) · intro r obtain ⟨ρ,hdρ,hρ⟩ := h.translate S H f hf hB (I.relation r) (hwρ r) apply (uniform_stateRelation S H f I hm j hrep ρ hdρ r hρ).congr intro i v apply exists_congr intro x apply exists_congr intro y exact and_congr (⟨fun h => Subtype.ext h.symm,fun h => (congrArg Subtype.val h).symm⟩) (and_congr (⟨fun h => Subtype.ext h.symm,fun h => (congrArg Subtype.val h).symm⟩) Iff.rfl) end end WitnessedSeparation.Interpretations namespace WitnessedSeparation.Interpretations.Program noncomputable section open Classical Counting HFCoding Hereditary Finset variable {ι R L : Type} (P : Program R) theorem exists_width : ∃ m : ℕ, 6 ≤ m ∧ P.init.domain.scopedWidth < m ∧ P.init.identify.scopedWidth < m ∧ (∀ r, (P.init.relation r).scopedWidth < m) ∧ P.step.domain.scopedWidth < m ∧ P.step.identify.scopedWidth < m ∧ (∀ r, (P.step.relation r).scopedWidth < m) ∧ P.halt.scopedWidth < m ∧ P.output.scopedWidth < m := by let := P.stateFinite let b : ℕ := univ.sup (fun r => max (P.init.relation r).scopedWidth (P.step.relation r).scopedWidth) let m := 7 + P.init.domain.scopedWidth + P.init.identify.scopedWidth + b + P.step.domain.scopedWidth + P.step.identify.scopedWidth + P.halt.scopedWidth + P.output.scopedWidth have hb (r) : max (P.init.relation r).scopedWidth (P.step.relation r).scopedWidth ≤ b := le_sup (f := fun r => max (P.init.relation r).scopedWidth (P.step.relation r).scopedWidth) (mem_univ r) refine ⟨m,?_,?_,?_,?_,?_,?_,?_,?_,?_⟩ all_goals first | (intro r; have h := hb r; dsimp [m]; omega) | (dsimp [m]; omega) variable (S : ι → Structure R) {d : ∀ i, Set (HF (S i).Carrier)} variable (C : ∀ i, Counting.Structure L (Domain (d i))) variable {B K m : ℕ} theorem family_mono_le (A : Structure R) (B : ℕ) {j k : ℕ} (h : j ≤ k) : P.family A B j ⊆ P.family A B k := by induction h with | refl => exact Subset.rfl | @step k h ih => exact ih.trans (P.family_mono A B k) variable (hfamily : ∀ i x, x ∈ P.family (S i) B K → x ∈ d i) include hfamily in theorem code_mem_domain {j : ℕ} (hj : j < K) (i : ι) (a : (P.state (S i) j).Carrier) : P.code (S i) j a ∈ d i := hfamily i _ (P.family_mono_le (S i) B (by omega) (P.code_mem_family (S i) B j a)) def stateCode {j : ℕ} (hj : j < K) (i : ι) (a : (P.state (S i) j).Carrier) : Domain (d i) := ⟨P.code (S i) j a,P.code_mem_domain S hfamily hj i a⟩ theorem stateCode_injective {j : ℕ} (hj : j < K) (i : ι) : Function.Injective (P.stateCode S hfamily hj i) := by intro a b h exact P.code_injective (S i) j (congrArg Subtype.val h) def inputCode (i : ι) (a : (S i).Carrier) : Domain (d i) := ⟨atom a,hfamily i _ (P.atom_mem_family (S i) B K a)⟩ theorem inputCode_injective (i : ι) : Function.Injective (P.inputCode S hfamily i) := by intro a b h exact atom_injective (congrArg Subtype.val h) variable (hd : ∀ i, ∀ x ∈ d i, ∀ y, y ∈ x → y ∈ d i) variable (hmem : UniformDefinable C m 2 (fun _ v => (v 0).val ∈ (v 1).val)) variable (hset : UniformDefinable C m 1 (fun _ v => isSet (v 0).val = true)) variable (hm : 6 ≤ m) (hpure : ∀ i k, ordinal (A := (S i).Carrier) k ∈ d i) variable (hN : ∀ i, Nat.card (S i).Carrier ≤ B) variable (hsize : ∀ i j, j < K → Nat.card (P.state (S i) j).Carrier ≤ B) variable (wiδ : P.init.domain.scopedWidth < m) (wiη : P.init.identify.scopedWidth < m) variable (wiρ : ∀ r, (P.init.relation r).scopedWidth < m) variable (wsδ : P.step.domain.scopedWidth < m) (wsη : P.step.identify.scopedWidth < m) variable (wsρ : ∀ r, (P.step.relation r).scopedWidth < m) variable (hinput : StateDefinable S C (P.inputCode S hfamily) m) include hd hmem hset hm hpure hN hsize wiδ wiη wiρ wsδ wsη wsρ hinput theorem state_definable {j : ℕ} (hj : j < K) : StateDefinable (fun i => P.state (S i) j) C (P.stateCode S hfamily hj) m := by induction j with | zero => have hpairs (i) (p : P.init.Domain (S i)) : pair (P.inputCode S hfamily i p.val.1).val (P.inputCode S hfamily i p.val.2).val ∈ d i := by apply hfamily i apply P.family_mono_le (S i) B (show 1 ≤ K by omega) apply mem_union_left apply mem_union_right exact mem_biUnion.mpr ⟨p,mem_univ _,by simp [wrappers,inputCode]⟩ have hc (i) (x : P.init.Vertex (S i)) : vertexCode P.init (S i) (Subtype.val ∘ P.inputCode S hfamily i) 1 x ∈ d i := P.code_mem_domain S hfamily hj i x exact hinput.apply S C (P.inputCode S hfamily) (P.inputCode_injective S hfamily) P.init 1 hc hd hmem hset hm hpure hpairs hN wiδ wiη wiρ | succ j ih => have hj' : j < K := by omega have hpairs (i) (p : P.step.Domain (P.state (S i) j)) : pair (P.stateCode S hfamily hj' i p.val.1).val (P.stateCode S hfamily hj' i p.val.2).val ∈ d i := by apply hfamily i apply P.family_mono_le (S i) B (show j+2 ≤ K by omega) apply mem_union_left apply mem_union_right exact mem_biUnion.mpr ⟨p,mem_univ _,by simp [wrappers,stateCode]⟩ have hc (i) (x : P.step.Vertex (P.state (S i) j)) : vertexCode P.step (P.state (S i) j) (Subtype.val ∘ P.stateCode S hfamily hj' i) (j+2) x ∈ d i := P.code_mem_domain S hfamily hj i x exact (ih hj').apply (fun i => P.state (S i) j) C (P.stateCode S hfamily hj') (P.stateCode_injective S hfamily hj') P.step (j+2) hc hd hmem hset hm hpure hpairs (fun i => hsize i j hj') wsδ wsη wsρ end end WitnessedSeparation.Interpretations.Program namespace WitnessedSeparation.Interpretations noncomputable section open Classical Counting variable {ι R L : Type} {D : ι → Type} variable (S : ι → Structure R) (C : ∀ i, Counting.Structure L (D i)) variable (e : ∀ i, (S i).Carrier → D i) {m B : ℕ} theorem StateDefinable.sentence (h : StateDefinable S C e m) (he : ∀ i, Function.Injective (e i)) (hB : ∀ i, Nat.card (S i).Carrier ≤ B) (ψ : Formula R 0) (hw : ψ.scopedWidth < m) : ∃ φ : Counting.Formula L (Fin m), φ.free = ∅ ∧ ∀ i v, φ.eval (C i) v ↔ ψ.holds (S i) := by obtain ⟨Q,hQ,hψ⟩ := h.translate S C e he hB ψ hw obtain ⟨φ,hφ,hφQ⟩ := hQ Fin.elim0 refine ⟨φ,?_,?_⟩ · apply Finset.subset_empty.mp simpa only [Finset.univ_eq_empty,Finset.image_empty] using hφ · intro i v have hv : v ∘ (Fin.elim0 : Fin 0 → Fin m) = e i ∘ Fin.elim0 := by funext k; exact k.elim0 exact (hφQ i v).trans (by rw [hv]; exact hψ i Fin.elim0) namespace Program variable {R : Type} (P : Program R) theorem haltsAt_unique (S : Structure R) {j k : ℕ} (hj : P.haltsAt S j) (hk : P.haltsAt S k) : j = k := by rcases lt_trichotomy j k with h|h|h · exact False.elim (hk.2 j h hj.1) · exact h · exact False.elim (hj.2 k h hk.1) theorem accepts_iff_of_haltsAt (S : Structure R) {j : ℕ} (hj : P.haltsAt S j) : P.accepts S ↔ P.output.holds (P.state S j) := by constructor · rintro ⟨k,hk,hout⟩ rwa [P.haltsAt_unique S hk hj] at hout · exact fun hout => ⟨j,hj,hout⟩ theorem synchronize (S T : Structure R) {j k : ℕ} (hj : P.haltsAt S j) (hk : P.haltsAt T k) (hhalt : ∀ l ≤ min j k, P.halt.holds (P.state S l) ↔ P.halt.holds (P.state T l)) (hout : ∀ l ≤ min j k, P.output.holds (P.state S l) ↔ P.output.holds (P.state T l)) : j = k ∧ (P.accepts S ↔ P.accepts T) := by have heq : j = k := by rcases le_total j k with h|h · have hh := (hhalt j (by omega)).mp hj.1 have hkj : k ≤ j := by by_contra h'; exact hk.2 j (by omega) hh omega · have hh := (hhalt k (by omega)).mpr hk.1 have hjk : j ≤ k := by by_contra h'; exact hj.2 k (by omega) hh omega refine ⟨heq,?_⟩ rw [P.accepts_iff_of_haltsAt S hj,P.accepts_iff_of_haltsAt T hk,← heq] exact hout j (by omega) end Program end end WitnessedSeparation.Interpretations namespace WitnessedSeparation.Grid noncomputable section open Classical Finset Support variable {n : ℕ} private theorem four_fibers {α β : Type*} [Fintype α] [DecidableEq β] (f₀ f₁ f₂ f₃ : α → β) (h₀ : Function.Injective f₀) (h₁ : Function.Injective f₁) (h₂ : Function.Injective f₂) (h₃ : Function.Injective f₃) (e : β) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (hp : ∀ a, p a → f₀ a = e ∨ f₁ a = e ∨ f₂ a = e ∨ f₃ a = e) : Fintype.card {a // p a} ≤ 4 := by have hcard (f : α → β) (hf : Function.Injective f) : (univ.filter (fun a => f a = e)).card ≤ 1 := by apply Finset.card_le_one.mpr intro a ha b hb exact hf ((mem_filter.mp ha).2.trans (mem_filter.mp hb).2.symm) rw [Fintype.card_subtype] have hs : univ.filter p ⊆ ((univ.filter (fun a => f₀ a = e) ∪ univ.filter (fun a => f₁ a = e)) ∪ univ.filter (fun a => f₂ a = e)) ∪ univ.filter (fun a => f₃ a = e) := by intro a ha have h := hp a (mem_filter.mp ha).2 simpa only [mem_union,mem_filter,mem_univ,true_and,or_assoc] using h exact (card_le_card hs).trans (le_trans (card_union_le _ _) (by have h01 := card_union_le (univ.filter (fun a => f₀ a = e)) (univ.filter (fun a => f₁ a = e)) have h012 := card_union_le (univ.filter (fun a => f₀ a = e) ∪ univ.filter (fun a => f₁ a = e)) (univ.filter (fun a => f₂ a = e)) have := hcard f₀ h₀; have := hcard f₁ h₁; have := hcard f₂ h₂; have := hcard f₃ h₃ omega)) theorem edgeFaces_card_le (e : Edge n) : Fintype.card (EdgeFaces e) ≤ 12 := by have hxy : Fintype.card {f : FaceXY n // cycle (.inl f) e ≠ 0} ≤ 4 := by refine four_fibers (α := FaceXY n) (β := Edge n) (fun ⟨i,j,k⟩ => ex i j.castSucc k) (fun ⟨i,j,k⟩ => ey i.succ j k) (fun ⟨i,j,k⟩ => ex i j.succ k) (fun ⟨i,j,k⟩ => ey i.castSucc j k) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ e _ ?_ · rintro ⟨i,j,k⟩ ⟨i',j',k'⟩ h; simpa [ex] using h · rintro ⟨i,j,k⟩ ⟨i',j',k'⟩ h; simpa [ey] using h · rintro ⟨i,j,k⟩ ⟨i',j',k'⟩ h; simpa [ex] using h · rintro ⟨i,j,k⟩ ⟨i',j',k'⟩ h; simpa [ey] using h · rintro ⟨i,j,k⟩ h by_contra hn push Not at hn apply h simp [cycle,Pi.single_eq_of_ne,Ne.symm hn.1,Ne.symm hn.2.1, Ne.symm hn.2.2.1,Ne.symm hn.2.2.2] have hxz : Fintype.card {f : FaceXZ n // cycle (.inr (.inl f)) e ≠ 0} ≤ 4 := by refine four_fibers (α := FaceXZ n) (β := Edge n) (fun ⟨i,j,k⟩ => ex i j k.castSucc) (fun ⟨i,j,k⟩ => ez i.succ j k) (fun ⟨i,j,k⟩ => ex i j k.succ) (fun ⟨i,j,k⟩ => ez i.castSucc j k) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ e _ ?_ · rintro ⟨i,j,k⟩ ⟨i',j',k'⟩ h; simpa [ex] using h · rintro ⟨i,j,k⟩ ⟨i',j',k'⟩ h; simpa [ez] using h · rintro ⟨i,j,k⟩ ⟨i',j',k'⟩ h; simpa [ex] using h · rintro ⟨i,j,k⟩ ⟨i',j',k'⟩ h; simpa [ez] using h · rintro ⟨i,j,k⟩ h by_contra hn push Not at hn apply h simp [cycle,Pi.single_eq_of_ne,Ne.symm hn.1,Ne.symm hn.2.1, Ne.symm hn.2.2.1,Ne.symm hn.2.2.2] have hyz : Fintype.card {f : FaceYZ n // cycle (.inr (.inr f)) e ≠ 0} ≤ 4 := by refine four_fibers (α := FaceYZ n) (β := Edge n) (fun ⟨i,j,k⟩ => ey i j k.castSucc) (fun ⟨i,j,k⟩ => ez i j.succ k) (fun ⟨i,j,k⟩ => ey i j k.succ) (fun ⟨i,j,k⟩ => ez i j.castSucc k) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ e _ ?_ · rintro ⟨i,j,k⟩ ⟨i',j',k'⟩ h; simpa [ey] using h · rintro ⟨i,j,k⟩ ⟨i',j',k'⟩ h; simpa [ez] using h · rintro ⟨i,j,k⟩ ⟨i',j',k'⟩ h; simpa [ey] using h · rintro ⟨i,j,k⟩ ⟨i',j',k'⟩ h; simpa [ez] using h · rintro ⟨i,j,k⟩ h by_contra hn push Not at hn apply h simp [cycle,Pi.single_eq_of_ne,Ne.symm hn.1,Ne.symm hn.2.1, Ne.symm hn.2.2.1,Ne.symm hn.2.2.2] unfold EdgeFaces Face rw [Fintype.card_congr Equiv.subtypeSum,Fintype.card_sum, Fintype.card_congr Equiv.subtypeSum,Fintype.card_sum] omega def localSizeBound : ℕ := 3^25 theorem localGroup_card_le (e : Edge n) : Fintype.card (LocalGroup e) ≤ localSizeBound := by rw [Fintype.card_congr (Support.H.productEquiv (localCycle e)),Fintype.card_prod, Fintype.card_fun,Fintype.card_prod] have hf := edgeFaces_card_le e simp only [Scalar,ZMod.card] at * change (3*3)^Fintype.card (EdgeFaces e)*3 ≤ 3^25 calc (3*3)^Fintype.card (EdgeFaces e)*3 ≤ (3*3)^12*3 := Nat.mul_le_mul_right 3 (Nat.pow_le_pow_right (by norm_num) hf) _ = 3^25 := by norm_num theorem configuration_card_le (b : Vertex n → Scalar) (v : Vertex n) : Fintype.card (Configuration b v) ≤ localSizeBound^6 := by have hi : Function.Injective (fun s : Configuration b v => s.state) := fun s t h => Configuration.ext (congrFun h) have hdegree : Fintype.card (IncidentEdges v) ≤ 6 := degree_le_six v calc Fintype.card (Configuration b v) ≤ Fintype.card (LocalStates v) := Fintype.card_le_of_injective _ hi _ = ∏ e : IncidentEdges v, Fintype.card (LocalGroup e.val) := Fintype.card_pi _ ≤ ∏ _e : IncidentEdges v, localSizeBound := Finset.prod_le_prod (fun e _ => localGroup_card_le e.val) _ = localSizeBound^Fintype.card (IncidentEdges v) := by simp _ ≤ localSizeBound^6 := Nat.pow_le_pow_right (by norm_num [localSizeBound]) hdegree def atomSizeConstant : ℕ := 3*localSizeBound+localSizeBound^6 theorem atom_card_bounds (hn : 1 ≤ n) (b : Vertex n → Scalar) : (n+1)^3 ≤ Fintype.card (Atom b) ∧ Fintype.card (Atom b) ≤ atomSizeConstant*(n+1)^3 := by have hv : Fintype.card (Vertex n) = (n+1)^3 := by simp [Vertex]; ring have he : Fintype.card (Edge n) ≤ 3*(n+1)^3 := by simp only [Edge,EdgeX,EdgeY,EdgeZ,Fintype.card_sum,Fintype.card_prod,Fintype.card_fin] nlinarith constructor · rw [← hv] apply Fintype.card_le_of_injective (fun v : Vertex n => (.inr ⟨v,someConfiguration hn b v⟩ : Atom b)) intro v w h exact congrArg Sigma.fst (Sum.inr.inj h) · change Fintype.card ((Σ e : Edge n, LocalGroup e) ⊕ (Σ v : Vertex n, Configuration b v)) ≤ _ rw [← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Nat.card_sum, Nat.card_sigma, Nat.card_sigma] simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card] calc (∑ e : Edge n, Fintype.card (LocalGroup e))+ ∑ v : Vertex n, Fintype.card (Configuration b v) ≤ (∑ _e : Edge n, localSizeBound)+∑ _v : Vertex n, localSizeBound^6 := add_le_add (sum_le_sum (fun e _ => localGroup_card_le e)) (sum_le_sum (fun v _ => configuration_card_le b v)) _ = Fintype.card (Edge n)*localSizeBound+Fintype.card (Vertex n)*localSizeBound^6 := by simp _ ≤ (3*(n+1)^3)*localSizeBound+(n+1)^3*localSizeBound^6 := by rw [hv] exact add_le_add (Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ he) (le_refl _) _ = atomSizeConstant*(n+1)^3 := by unfold atomSizeConstant; ring end end WitnessedSeparation.Grid namespace WitnessedSeparation.Hereditary noncomputable section open Classical variable {A G : Type*} [Group G] [MulAction G A] {s : ℕ} theorem hereditary_iff {x : HF A} : HereditarilySupported (G := G) s x ↔ Supported (G := G) s x ∧ ∀ y, y ∈ x → HereditarilySupported (G := G) s y := by constructor · intro h exact ⟨h x .refl,fun y hy z hz => h z (hz.tail hy)⟩ · rintro ⟨h,hm⟩ y hy cases hy with | refl => exact h | tail hz hzx => exact hm _ hzx _ hz theorem hereditary_transitive {x y : HF A} (hx : HereditarilySupported (G := G) s x) (hy : y ∈ x) : HereditarilySupported (G := G) s y := (hereditary_iff.mp hx).2 y hy theorem ordinal_hereditary [Nonempty A] (s j : ℕ) : HereditarilySupported (G := G) s (ordinal (A := A) j) := by induction j using Nat.strong_induction_on with | h j ih => apply hereditary_iff.mpr constructor · refine ⟨fun _ => Classical.choice (inferInstance : Nonempty A),?_⟩ intro g _ exact map_ordinal (fun a => g • a) j · intro y hy obtain ⟨k,hk,rfl⟩ := (mem_ordinal y j).mp hy exact ih k hk end end WitnessedSeparation.Hereditary namespace WitnessedSeparation.Grid noncomputable section open Classical Hereditary Counting HFCoding Interpretations variable {n : ℕ} (b : Vertex n → Scalar) abbrev programInput : Interpretations.Structure Symbol where Carrier := Atom b finite := inferInstance rel := (atomInput b).rel def programActionIso (g : BoxGroup n) : (programInput b).Iso (programInput b) where equiv := (actionIso (b := b) g).toEquiv rel r x y := ((actionIso (b := b) g).rel_eq r x y).symm variable (P : Interpretations.Program Symbol) theorem trace_supported (hn : 1 ≤ n) (B K N : ℕ) (hB : 2 ≤ B) (hK : K ≤ B) (hN : Nat.card (Atom b) ≤ B) (hNpos : 0 < N) (hsize : ∀ j < K, Nat.card (P.state (programInput b) j).Carrier ≤ B) (q : ℝ) (hq : 0 ≤ q) (hpoly : (9*B^3 : ℝ) ≤ (N : ℝ)^q) : ∀ x ∈ P.family (programInput b) B K, HereditarilySupported (G := CentralGroup n) ⌈2*(n+1:ℝ)*(q*Real.logb 3 N)^2⌉₊ x := by obtain ⟨hc,ht,hi⟩ := P.trace_family (programInput b) B K hB hK hN hsize have hInv : ∀ g : BoxGroup n, ∀ x ∈ P.family (programInput b) B K, g • x ∈ P.family (programInput b) B K := by intro g x hx exact hi (programActionIso b g) x hx exact invariant_family_hereditarily_supported hn _ hInv ht N hNpos q hq (le_trans (by exact_mod_cast hc) hpoly) variable {ι : Type} (bs : ι → Vertex n → Scalar) {s m : ℕ} def programDomain (i : ι) : Set (HF (Atom (bs i))) := HereditarilySupported (G := CentralGroup n) s def programHF (i : ι) : Counting.Structure (Forms.HFRelation AnalysisSymbol) (Domain (programDomain bs (s := s) i)) := Forms.hfStructure (analysisStructure (bs i)) theorem program_domain_transitive (i : ι) : ∀ x ∈ programDomain bs (s := s) i, ∀ y, y ∈ x → y ∈ programDomain bs (s := s) i := fun _ hx _ hy => hereditary_transitive hx hy theorem program_mem_uniform : UniformDefinable (programHF bs (s := s)) m 2 (fun _ v => (v 0).val ∈ (v 1).val) := UniformDefinable.relation (S := programHF bs (s := s)) .mem 0 1 theorem program_set_uniform : UniformDefinable (programHF bs (s := s)) m 1 (fun _ v => isSet (v 0).val = true) := by apply (UniformDefinable.relation (S := programHF bs (s := s)) .atom 0 0).neg.congr intro i v change (¬ isSet (v 0).val = false) ↔ _ cases isSet (v 0).val <;> simp theorem program_pure (hn : 1 ≤ n) (i : ι) (k : ℕ) : ordinal k ∈ programDomain bs (s := s) i := by let := atom_nonempty hn (bs i) exact ordinal_hereditary s k variable {B K : ℕ} variable (hfamily : ∀ i x, x ∈ P.family (programInput (bs i)) B K → x ∈ programDomain bs (s := s) i) theorem program_input_definable : StateDefinable (fun i => programInput (bs i)) (programHF bs) (P.inputCode (fun i => programInput (bs i)) hfamily) m := by constructor · apply (UniformDefinable.relation (S := programHF bs) .atom 0 0).congr intro i v change isSet (v 0).val = false ↔ ∃ a, _ constructor · intro hx rcases atom_or_set (v 0).val with ⟨a,ha⟩|ha · exact ⟨a,Subtype.ext ha.symm⟩ · rw [ha,isSet_ofFinset] at hx cases hx · rintro ⟨a,ha⟩ rw [← congrArg Subtype.val ha] rfl · intro r apply (UniformDefinable.relation (S := programHF bs) (.base (.input r)) 0 1).congr intro i v change (∃ a b, (v 0).val = atom a ∧ (v 1).val = atom b ∧ AtomRelation (bs i) r a b) ↔ _ apply exists_congr intro a apply exists_congr intro b refine and_congr ?_ (and_congr ?_ ?_) · exact ⟨fun h => Subtype.ext h.symm,fun h => (congrArg Subtype.val h).symm⟩ · exact ⟨fun h => Subtype.ext h.symm,fun h => (congrArg Subtype.val h).symm⟩ · simp [atomInput] end noncomputable section open Classical Hereditary Counting HFCoding Interpretations variable {n B K N m M : ℕ} (P : Program Symbol) (vstar : Vertex n) def twoCharges : Bool → Vertex n → Scalar | false => 0 | true => Pi.single vstar 1 variable (hn : 1 ≤ n) (hB : 2 ≤ B) (hK : K ≤ B) (hNpos : 0 < N) variable (hN : ∀ i, Nat.card (Atom (twoCharges vstar i)) ≤ B) variable (hsize : ∀ i j, j < K → Nat.card (P.state (programInput (twoCharges vstar i)) j).Carrier ≤ B) variable (q : ℝ) (hq : 0 ≤ q) (hpoly : (9*B^3 : ℝ) ≤ (N : ℝ)^q) variable (hm : 6 ≤ m) variable (wiδ : P.init.domain.scopedWidth < m) (wiη : P.init.identify.scopedWidth < m) variable (wiρ : ∀ r, (P.init.relation r).scopedWidth < m) variable (wsδ : P.step.domain.scopedWidth < m) (wsη : P.step.identify.scopedWidth < m) variable (wsρ : ∀ r, (P.step.relation r).scopedWidth < m) include hn hB hK hNpos hN hsize hq hpoly hm wiδ wiη wiρ wsδ wsη wsρ theorem stage_sentence_agrees (hs : 0 < ⌈2*(n+1:ℝ)*(q*Real.logb 3 N)^2⌉₊) (hwidth : max 4 (m+1)*⌈2*(n+1:ℝ)*(q*Real.logb 3 N)^2⌉₊ ≤ M) (hhom : (7*(max 2 m*⌈2*(n+1:ℝ)*(q*Real.logb 3 N)^2⌉₊):ℝ)+ 7*((6*(max 2 m*⌈2*(n+1:ℝ)*(q*Real.logb 3 N)^2⌉₊):ℝ)/boxConstant)^((3:ℝ)/2)+1 ≤ M) (hgiant : GiantBound n M) {j : ℕ} (hj : j < K) (ψ : Interpretations.Formula P.StateSymbols 0) (hw : ψ.scopedWidth < m) : ψ.holds (P.state (programInput (0 : Vertex n → Scalar)) j) ↔ ψ.holds (P.state (programInput (Pi.single vstar 1)) j) := by let s := ⌈2*(n+1:ℝ)*(q*Real.logb 3 N)^2⌉₊ let S := fun i => programInput (twoCharges vstar i) let C := programHF (twoCharges vstar) (s := s) have hfamily : ∀ i x, x ∈ P.family (S i) B K → x ∈ programDomain (twoCharges vstar) (s := s) i := fun i => trace_supported (twoCharges vstar i) P hn B K N hB hK (hN i) hNpos (hsize i) q hq hpoly have hd := P.state_definable S C hfamily (program_domain_transitive (twoCharges vstar)) (program_mem_uniform (twoCharges vstar)) (program_set_uniform (twoCharges vstar)) hm (program_pure (twoCharges vstar) hn) hN hsize wiδ wiη wiρ wsδ wsη wsρ (program_input_definable P (twoCharges vstar) hfamily) hj obtain ⟨φ,hφ,hφψ⟩ := hd.sentence (fun i => P.state (S i) j) C (P.stateCode S hfamily hj) (P.stateCode_injective S hfamily hj) (fun i => hsize i j hj) ψ hw let v : Fin m → Domain (programDomain (twoCharges vstar) (s := s) false) := fun _ => ⟨ordinal 0,program_pure (twoCharges vstar) hn false 0⟩ let w : Fin m → Domain (programDomain (twoCharges vstar) (s := s) true) := fun _ => ⟨ordinal 0,program_pure (twoCharges vstar) hn true 0⟩ let := atom_nonempty hn (0 : Vertex n → Scalar) let := atom_nonempty hn (Pi.single vstar 1) exact (hφψ false v).symm.trans ((grid_hf_transfer hn hs (by omega) vstar hwidth hhom hgiant φ hφ v w).trans (hφψ true w)) end end WitnessedSeparation.Grid namespace WitnessedSeparation.Quantitative noncomputable section open Filter Asymptotics Topology lemma const_little_rpow (c : ℝ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : (fun _ : ℝ => c) =o[atTop] (fun L => L^r) := (isLittleO_const_id_atTop c).comp_tendsto (tendsto_rpow_atTop hr) lemma power_little_power {a b : ℝ} (hab : a < b) : (fun L : ℝ => L^a) =o[atTop] (fun L => L^b) := by have h := (isBigO_refl (fun L : ℝ => L^a) atTop).mul_isLittleO (const_little_rpow 1 (sub_pos.mpr hab)) apply h.congr' (by filter_upwards [] with L; simp) filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop (0:ℝ)] with L hL rw [← Real.rpow_add hL] congr 1 ring lemma ceil_little {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → ℝ} (hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, 0 ≤ f x) (h : f =o[l] g) (h1 : (fun _ => (1:ℝ)) =o[l] g) : (fun x => (⌈f x⌉₊ : ℝ)) =o[l] g := by apply IsLittleO.of_bound intro c hc filter_upwards [hf,h.bound (show 0 < c/2 by linarith),h1.bound (show 0 < c/2 by linarith)] with x hx hh hconst rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg (Nat.cast_nonneg _)] rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg hx] at hh norm_num at hconst have hb := Nat.ceil_lt_add_one hx simp only [Real.norm_eq_abs] at hh ⊢ linarith def radius (C q L : ℝ) : ℕ := ⌈2*L*(q*Real.logb 3 (C*L^3))^2⌉₊ def palette (L : ℝ) : ℕ := ⌊L^((7:ℝ)/4)⌋₊ lemma log_volume_little (C q : ℝ) (hC : 0 < C) : (fun L : ℝ => q*Real.logb 3 (C*L^3)) =o[atTop] (fun L => L^((1:ℝ)/12)) := by have hc := const_little_rpow (Real.log C) (show 0 < (1:ℝ)/12 by norm_num) have hl := (isLittleO_log_rpow_atTop (show 0 < (1:ℝ)/12 by norm_num)).const_mul_left 3 have h := ((hc.add hl).const_mul_left ((q:ℝ)/Real.log 3)) apply h.congr' _ (Filter.Eventually.of_forall (fun _ => rfl)) filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop (0:ℝ)] with L hL simp only [Real.logb,Real.log_mul (ne_of_gt hC) (ne_of_gt (pow_pos hL 3)),Real.log_pow] ring lemma radius_little (C q : ℝ) (hC : 0 < C) : (fun L : ℝ => (radius C q L : ℝ)) =o[atTop] (fun L => L^((7:ℝ)/6)) := by have hlog := log_volume_little C q hC have hsquare := hlog.pow (show 0 < 2 by omega) have hlin := (isBigO_refl (fun L : ℝ => L) atTop).mul_isLittleO hsquare have hraw : (fun L : ℝ => 2*L*(q*Real.logb 3 (C*L^3))^2) =o[atTop] (fun L => L^((7:ℝ)/6)) := by apply (hlin.const_mul_left 2).congr' (by filter_upwards [] with L; ring) filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop (0:ℝ)] with L hL calc L * (L ^ ((1:ℝ)/12)) ^ 2 = L^((1:ℝ)) * L^(((1:ℝ)/12)*2) := by rw [Real.rpow_one, Real.rpow_mul hL.le]; norm_num _ = L^((7:ℝ)/6) := by rw [← Real.rpow_add hL]; norm_num apply ceil_little _ hraw (const_little_rpow 1 (by norm_num)) filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop (0:ℝ)] with L hL positivity lemma radius_little_palette (C q : ℝ) (hC : 0 < C) : (fun L : ℝ => (radius C q L : ℝ)) =o[atTop] (fun L => L^((7:ℝ)/4)) := (radius_little C q hC).trans (power_little_power (by norm_num)) lemma homogeneity_little (C q m c : ℝ) (hC : 0 < C) : (fun L : ℝ => 7*(m*(radius C q L:ℝ))+7*((6*(m*(radius C q L:ℝ)))/c)^((3:ℝ)/2)+1) =o[atTop] (fun L => L^((7:ℝ)/4)) := by have hlin := (radius_little_palette C q hC).const_mul_left (7*m) have hsr := (radius_little C q hC).const_mul_left (6*m/c) have hp := hsr.rpow (show 0 < (3:ℝ)/2 by norm_num) ((eventually_ge_atTop (0:ℝ)).mono (fun L hL => Real.rpow_nonneg hL _)) have hp' : (fun L : ℝ => ((6*(m*(radius C q L:ℝ)))/c)^((3:ℝ)/2)) =o[atTop] (fun L => L^((7:ℝ)/4)) := by apply hp.congr' (by filter_upwards [] with L; congr 1; ring) filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop (0:ℝ)] with L hL rw [← Real.rpow_mul hL] congr 1 norm_num have h := (hlin.add (hp'.const_mul_left 7)).add (const_little_rpow 1 (by norm_num)) apply h.congr_left intro L ring lemma floor_big (a : ℝ) : (fun L : ℝ => (⌊L^a⌋₊:ℝ)) =O[atTop] (fun L => L^a) := by apply IsBigO.of_norm_eventuallyLE filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop (0:ℝ)] with L hL simp only [Real.norm_of_nonneg (Nat.cast_nonneg _)] exact Nat.floor_le (Real.rpow_nonneg hL _) lemma giant_little (c : ℝ) : (fun L : ℝ => ((12*(palette L:ℝ))/c)^((3:ℝ)/2)) =o[atTop] (fun L => L^3) := by have hb := (floor_big ((7:ℝ)/4)).const_mul_left (12/c) have hp := hb.rpow (show 0 ≤ (3:ℝ)/2 by norm_num) ((eventually_ge_atTop (0:ℝ)).mono (fun L hL => Real.rpow_nonneg hL _)) have hp' : (fun L : ℝ => ((12*(palette L:ℝ))/c)^((3:ℝ)/2)) =O[atTop] (fun L => L^((21:ℝ)/8)) := by apply hp.congr' (by filter_upwards [] with L; simp only [palette]; congr 1; ring) filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop (0:ℝ)] with L hL rw [← Real.rpow_mul hL] congr 1 norm_num have h := hp'.trans_isLittleO (power_little_power (a := (21:ℝ)/8) (b := 3) (by norm_num)) exact h.congr_right (fun L => Real.rpow_natCast L 3) theorem eventual_bounds (C q c : ℝ) (hC : 0 < C) (hc : 0 < c) (m : ℕ) : ∀ᶠ L : ℝ in atTop, (max 4 (m+1):ℝ)*(radius C q L:ℝ) ≤ (palette L:ℝ) ∧ 7*((max 2 m:ℝ)*(radius C q L:ℝ))+ 7*((6*((max 2 m:ℝ)*(radius C q L:ℝ)))/c)^((3:ℝ)/2)+1 ≤ (palette L:ℝ) ∧ ((12*(palette L:ℝ))/c)^((3:ℝ)/2) < L^3 := by have hw := ((radius_little_palette C q hC).const_mul_left (max 4 (m+1):ℝ)).bound (show 0 < (1:ℝ)/2 by norm_num) have hh := (homogeneity_little C q (max 2 m:ℝ) c hC).bound (show 0 < (1:ℝ)/2 by norm_num) have hg := (giant_little c).bound (show 0 < (1:ℝ)/2 by norm_num) filter_upwards [hw,hh,hg,eventually_gt_atTop (0:ℝ), (tendsto_rpow_atTop (show 0 < (7:ℝ)/4 by norm_num)).eventually_ge_atTop 2] with L hw hh hg hL hpow have hp : 0 ≤ L^((7:ℝ)/4) := Real.rpow_nonneg hL.le _ have hs : 0 ≤ (radius C q L:ℝ) := Nat.cast_nonneg _ have hfl := Nat.lt_floor_add_one (L^((7:ℝ)/4)) have hn : 0 ≤ 7*((max 2 m:ℝ)*(radius C q L:ℝ))+ 7*((6*((max 2 m:ℝ)*(radius C q L:ℝ)))/c)^((3:ℝ)/2)+1 := by positivity rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg (by positivity),Real.norm_of_nonneg hp] at hw rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg hn,Real.norm_of_nonneg hp] at hh rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg (by positivity),Real.norm_of_nonneg (pow_nonneg hL.le 3)] at hg change _ ≤ (⌊L^((7:ℝ)/4)⌋₊:ℝ) ∧ _ ≤ (⌊L^((7:ℝ)/4)⌋₊:ℝ) ∧ _ refine ⟨by linarith,by linarith,?_⟩ have hcube := pow_pos hL 3 linarith end def timeExponent (c d : ℕ) := c + 2*d + 2 def traceExponent (c d : ℕ) := 3*timeExponent c d + 4 lemma timeExponent_ge_two (c d : ℕ) : 2 ≤ timeExponent c d := by unfold timeExponent; omega lemma nat_le_power (N c : ℕ) (hN : 2 ≤ N) : c ≤ N^c := by induction c with | zero => simp | succ c ih => rw [pow_succ] have hp : 1 ≤ N^c := Nat.one_le_pow _ _ (by omega) nlinarith lemma polynomial_bounds (c d N : ℕ) (hN : 2 ≤ N) : 2 ≤ N^timeExponent c d ∧ N ≤ N^timeExponent c d ∧ c*(N+1)^d ≤ N^timeExponent c d ∧ 9*(N^timeExponent c d)^3 ≤ N^traceExponent c d := by have hpos : 1 ≤ N := by omega have hD := timeExponent_ge_two c d have hNB : N ≤ N^timeExponent c d := by simpa only [pow_one] using Nat.pow_le_pow_right hpos (show 1 ≤ timeExponent c d by omega) refine ⟨le_trans hN hNB,hNB,?_,?_⟩ · calc c*(N+1)^d ≤ N^c*(N^2)^d := Nat.mul_le_mul (nat_le_power N c hN) (Nat.pow_le_pow_left (by nlinarith : N+1 ≤ N^2) d) _ = N^(c+2*d) := by rw [← pow_mul,← pow_add] _ ≤ N^timeExponent c d := Nat.pow_le_pow_right hpos (by unfold timeExponent; omega) · calc 9*(N^timeExponent c d)^3 ≤ N^4*(N^timeExponent c d)^3 := by apply Nat.mul_le_mul_right have hh := Nat.pow_le_pow_left hN 4 norm_num at hh omega _ = N^traceExponent c d := by rw [← pow_mul,← pow_add] unfold traceExponent congr 1 omega lemma real_trace_bound (c d N : ℕ) (hN : 2 ≤ N) : (9*(N^timeExponent c d)^3 : ℝ) ≤ (N:ℝ)^(traceExponent c d:ℝ) := by rw [Real.rpow_natCast] exact_mod_cast (polynomial_bounds c d N hN).2.2.2 end WitnessedSeparation.Quantitative namespace WitnessedSeparation.Interpretations.Program noncomputable section open Classical Finset variable {R : Type} (P : Program R) lemma stage_le_cost (A : Structure R) (j : ℕ) : j+1 ≤ P.cost A j := by unfold cost omega lemma size_le_cost (A : Structure R) {j k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ j) : Nat.card (P.state A k).Carrier ≤ P.cost A j := by rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card] unfold cost have h := Finset.single_le_sum (f := fun l => Fintype.card (P.state A l).Carrier) (fun l _ => Nat.zero_le _) (show k ∈ Finset.range (j+1) by simpa using hk) omega end end WitnessedSeparation.Interpretations.Program end OAI