import OAI.Computability.WitnessedChoice.SupportedForms namespace OAI namespace WitnessedSeparation.Forms noncomputable section open Classical Counting Hereditary variable {R I A B P G H : Type*} variable [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] [Fintype A] [Fintype B] variable [Nonempty A] [Nonempty B] [Fintype P] variable [Group G] [MulAction G A] [Group H] [MulAction H B] variable {s : ℕ} abbrev Domain (G : Type*) [Group G] [MulAction G A] (s : ℕ) := {x : HF A // HereditarilySupported (G := G) s x} def Cell (S : Structure R A) (ep : P ⊕ Fin s ↪ I) (e2 : Fin s ⊕ Fin s ↪ I) (p : P → A) (φ : Form (Fin s) (Set (Formula R I))) (τ : Set (Formula R I)) : Set (Domain (A := A) G s) := {x | x.1 ∈ labelValues S ep e2 p τ φ} variable (S : Structure R A) (T : Structure R B) variable (ep : P ⊕ Fin s ↪ I) (epp : (P ⊕ Fin s) ⊕ Fin s ↪ I) variable (e2 : Fin s ⊕ Fin s ↪ I) (e3 : (Fin s ⊕ Fin s) ⊕ Fin s ↪ I) variable (e4 : ((Fin s ⊕ Fin s) ⊕ Fin s) ⊕ Fin s ↪ I) variable (hAutA : ∀ (g : G) r a b, S.rel r (g • a) (g • b) ↔ S.rel r a b) variable (hAutB : ∀ (g : H) r a b, T.rel r (g • a) (g • b) ↔ T.rel r a b) def cellEquiv (p : P → A) (φ : Form (Fin s) (Set (Formula R I))) (τ : Set (Formula R I)) : Cell (G := G) S ep e2 p φ τ ≃ labelValues S ep e2 p τ φ := Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtype (p := HereditarilySupported (G := G) s) (q := fun x => x ∈ labelValues S ep e2 p τ φ) (fun hx => by obtain ⟨a,rfl⟩ := hx exact value_hereditarily_supported S e2 hAutA φ a.1) include hAutA in omit [Fintype I] in private theorem cell_finite (p : P → A) (φ : Form (Fin s) (Set (Formula R I))) (τ : Set (Formula R I)) : (Cell (G := G) S ep e2 p φ τ).Finite := by let := Fintype.ofEquiv (labelValues S ep e2 p τ φ) (cellEquiv S ep e2 hAutA p φ τ).symm exact Set.toFinite _ include hAutA hAutB epp e3 e4 in theorem supported_domain_bijection (hs : 0 < s) (e0 : P ↪ I) (hHomA2 : ∀ a b : Fin s ⊕ Fin s → A, tupleType S e2 a = tupleType S e2 b → ∃ g : G, ∀ i, g • a i = b i) (hHomB2 : ∀ a b : Fin s ⊕ Fin s → B, tupleType T e2 a = tupleType T e2 b → ∃ g : H, ∀ i, g • a i = b i) (hHomA : ∀ a b : P ⊕ Fin s → A, tupleType S ep a = tupleType S ep b → ∃ g : G, ∀ i, g • a i = b i) (hHomB : ∀ a b : P ⊕ Fin s → B, tupleType T ep a = tupleType T ep b → ∃ g : H, ∀ i, g • a i = b i) (p : P → A) (q : P → B) (hp : tupleType S e0 p = tupleType T e0 q) : ∃ f : Domain (A := A) G s ≃ Domain (A := B) H s, ∀ x, ∃ φ : Form (Fin s) (Set (Formula R I)), ∃ a : Fin s → A, ∃ b : Fin s → B, Form.value S e2 φ a = x.1 ∧ Form.value T e2 φ b = (f x).1 ∧ tupleType S ep (Sum.elim p a) = tupleType T ep (Sum.elim q b) := by let L := {l : Form (Fin s) (Set (Formula R I)) × Set (Formula R I) // Nonempty (Molecules S ep p l.2)} let C : L → Set (Domain (A := A) G s) := fun l => Cell S ep e2 p l.1.1 l.1.2 let D : L → Set (Domain (A := B) H s) := fun l => Cell T ep e2 q l.1.1 l.1.2 have nonemptyB (l : L) : Nonempty (Molecules T ep q l.1.2) := by obtain ⟨f⟩ := tupleType_extension_equiv S T e0 ep p q hp l.1.2 exact Nonempty.map f l.2 have coverC : ∀ x, ∃ l, x ∈ C l := by intro x obtain ⟨φ,a,ha⟩ := representation S e2 hAutA hs hHomA2 x.1 x.2 let τ := tupleType S ep (Sum.elim p a) let l : L := ⟨(φ,τ),⟨⟨a,rfl⟩⟩⟩ exact ⟨l,⟨⟨a,rfl⟩,ha⟩⟩ have coverD : ∀ y, ∃ l, y ∈ D l := by intro y obtain ⟨φ,b,hb⟩ := representation T e2 hAutB hs hHomB2 y.1 y.2 obtain ⟨a,ha⟩ := tupleType_append T S e0 ep q p b hp.symm let τ := tupleType T ep (Sum.elim q b) let l : L := ⟨(φ,τ),⟨⟨a,ha.symm⟩⟩⟩ exact ⟨l,⟨⟨b,rfl⟩,hb⟩⟩ have partC : ∀ l k x, x ∈ C l → x ∈ C k → C l = C k := by intro l k x hx hk have hh := label_partition S ep e2 hAutA p l.1.2 hHomA l.1.1 k.1.1 k.1.2 x.1 hx hk exact congrArg (fun Z : Set (HF A) => {x : Domain G s | x.1 ∈ Z}) hh have partD : ∀ l k x, x ∈ D l → x ∈ D k → D l = D k := by intro l k x hx hk have hh := label_partition T ep e2 hAutB q l.1.2 hHomB l.1.1 k.1.1 k.1.2 x.1 hx hk exact congrArg (fun Z : Set (HF B) => {x : Domain H s | x.1 ∈ Z}) hh have same : ∀ l k, C l = C k ↔ D l = D k := by intro l k constructor · intro he obtain ⟨a⟩ := l.2 let x : Domain G s := ⟨Form.value S e2 l.1.1 a.1, value_hereditarily_supported S e2 hAutA _ _⟩ have hx : x ∈ C l := ⟨a,rfl⟩ have hk : x ∈ C k := he ▸ hx obtain ⟨y,hy,hy'⟩ := label_overlap_transfer S T ep epp e2 e3 e4 e0 p q hp l.1.1 k.1.1 l.1.2 k.1.2 ⟨x.1,hx,hk⟩ have hsupp : HereditarilySupported (G := H) s y := by obtain ⟨b,rfl⟩ := hy exact value_hereditarily_supported T e2 hAutB _ _ exact partD l k ⟨y,hsupp⟩ hy hy' · intro he obtain ⟨b⟩ := nonemptyB l let y : Domain H s := ⟨Form.value T e2 l.1.1 b.1, value_hereditarily_supported T e2 hAutB _ _⟩ have hy : y ∈ D l := ⟨b,rfl⟩ have hk : y ∈ D k := he ▸ hy obtain ⟨x,hx,hx'⟩ := label_overlap_transfer T S ep epp e2 e3 e4 e0 q p hp.symm l.1.1 k.1.1 l.1.2 k.1.2 ⟨y.1,hy,hk⟩ have hsupp : HereditarilySupported (G := G) s x := by obtain ⟨a,rfl⟩ := hx exact value_hereditarily_supported S e2 hAutA _ _ exact partC l k ⟨x,hsupp⟩ hx hx' have card : ∀ l, Nat.card (C l) = Nat.card (D l) := by intro l obtain ⟨a⟩ := l.2 obtain ⟨b⟩ := nonemptyB l have hh := label_values_card S T ep epp e2 e3 e4 hAutA hAutB hHomA hHomB p q l.1.2 l.1.1 a b have he := Nat.card_congr (cellEquiv S ep e2 hAutA p l.1.1 l.1.2) have hf := Nat.card_congr (cellEquiv T ep e2 hAutB q l.1.1 l.1.2) exact he.trans (hh.trans hf.symm) obtain ⟨f,hf⟩ := WitnessedSeparation.glue_finite_cells C D coverC coverD partC partD same (fun l => cell_finite S ep e2 hAutA p l.1.1 l.1.2) (fun l => cell_finite T ep e2 hAutB q l.1.1 l.1.2) card refine ⟨f,fun x => ?_⟩ obtain ⟨l,⟨a,ha⟩,⟨b,hb⟩⟩ := hf x exact ⟨l.1.1,a.1,b.1,ha,hb,a.2.trans b.2.symm⟩ end noncomputable section open Classical Counting Hereditary variable {R I A B V G H : Type*} variable [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] [Fintype A] [Fintype B] variable [Nonempty A] [Nonempty B] [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] variable [Group G] [MulAction G A] [Group H] [MulAction H B] variable {s : ℕ} inductive HFRelation (R : Type*) | mem | atom | base (r : R) def hfStructure (S : Structure R A) : Structure (HFRelation R) (Domain (A := A) G s) where rel | .mem, x, y => x.1 ∈ y.1 | .atom, x, _ => isSet x.1 = false | .base r, x, y => ∃ a b, x.1 = Hereditary.atom a ∧ y.1 = Hereditary.atom b ∧ S.rel r a b def Represented (S : Structure R A) (T : Structure R B) (ef : V × Fin s ↪ I) (e2 : Fin s ⊕ Fin s ↪ I) (v : V → Domain (A := A) G s) (w : V → Domain (A := B) H s) : Prop := ∃ φ : V → Form (Fin s) (Set (Formula R I)), ∃ a : V × Fin s → A, ∃ b : V × Fin s → B, (∀ i, Form.value S e2 (φ i) (fun j => a (i,j)) = (v i).1) ∧ (∀ i, Form.value T e2 (φ i) (fun j => b (i,j)) = (w i).1) ∧ tupleType S ef a = tupleType T ef b def twoBlocks (i j : V) (h : i ≠ j) : Fin s ⊕ Fin s ↪ V × Fin s where toFun := Sum.elim (Prod.mk i) (Prod.mk j) inj' := by intro a b hab cases a <;> cases b <;> simp only [Sum.elim_inl,Sum.elim_inr,Prod.mk.injEq] at hab · congr 1; exact hab.2 · exact (h hab.1).elim · exact (h hab.1.symm).elim · congr 1; exact hab.2 omit [Fintype A] [Nonempty A] [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] in @[simp] theorem comp_twoBlocks (i j : V) (h : i ≠ j) (a : V × Fin s → A) : a ∘ twoBlocks i j h = Sum.elim (fun k => a (i,k)) (fun k => a (j,k)) := by funext x; cases x <;> rfl def splitBlock (i : V) : ({j : V // j ≠ i} × Fin s) ⊕ Fin s ≃ V × Fin s where toFun := Sum.elim (fun x => (x.1.1,x.2)) (fun j => (i,j)) invFun := fun x => if h : x.1 = i then .inr x.2 else .inl (⟨x.1,h⟩,x.2) left_inv := by intro x; cases x with | inl x => simp [x.1.2] | inr j => simp right_inv := by intro x; by_cases h : x.1 = i · simp [h]; exact Prod.ext h.symm rfl · simp [h] variable (S : Structure R A) (T : Structure R B) variable (ef : V × Fin s ↪ I) (e2 : Fin s ⊕ Fin s ↪ I) variable (e3 : (Fin s ⊕ Fin s) ⊕ Fin s ↪ I) variable (e4 : ((Fin s ⊕ Fin s) ⊕ Fin s) ⊕ Fin s ↪ I) include e3 e4 in theorem represented_equal (v : V → Domain (A := A) G s) (w : V → Domain (A := B) H s) (h : Represented S T ef e2 v w) (i j : V) : v i = v j ↔ w i = w j := by by_cases hij : i = j · subst j; simp obtain ⟨φ,a,b,ha,hb,ht⟩ := h have hh := tupleType_project S T ef e2 (twoBlocks i j hij) a b ht simp only [comp_twoBlocks] at hh have he := equality_transfer S T e2 e3 e4 (φ i) (φ j) _ _ _ _ hh simpa only [ha,hb,Subtype.ext_iff] using he include e3 e4 in theorem represented_mem (v : V → Domain (A := A) G s) (w : V → Domain (A := B) H s) (h : Represented S T ef e2 v w) (i j : V) : (v i).1 ∈ (v j).1 ↔ (w i).1 ∈ (w j).1 := by by_cases hij : i = j · subst j exact iff_of_false (fun h => (Nat.lt_irrefl _ (rank_lt_of_mem h))) (fun h => (Nat.lt_irrefl _ (rank_lt_of_mem h))) obtain ⟨φ,a,b,ha,hb,ht⟩ := h have hh := tupleType_project S T ef e2 (twoBlocks i j hij) a b ht simp only [comp_twoBlocks] at hh have he := membership_transfer S T e2 e3 e4 (φ i) (φ j) _ _ _ _ hh simpa only [ha,hb] using he omit [Fintype I] [DecidableEq V] in theorem represented_atom (v : V → Domain (A := A) G s) (w : V → Domain (A := B) H s) (h : Represented S T ef e2 v w) (i : V) : isSet (v i).1 = false ↔ isSet (w i).1 = false := by obtain ⟨φ,a,b,ha,hb,ht⟩ := h rw [←ha i,←hb i] cases φ i <;> simp omit [Fintype I] in private theorem base_value (φ ψ : Form (Fin s) (Set (Formula R I))) (a b : Fin s → A) (r : R) : (∃ x y, Form.value S e2 φ a = Hereditary.atom x ∧ Form.value S e2 ψ b = Hereditary.atom y ∧ S.rel r x y) ↔ match φ,ψ with | .atom i, .atom j => S.rel r (a i) (b j) | _, _ => False := by have hn (n : ℕ) (child : Fin n → Form (Fin s) (Set (Formula R I))) (label : Fin n → Set (Formula R I)) (c : Fin s → A) (x : A) : Form.value S e2 (.set n child label) c ≠ Hereditary.atom x := by intro h; have hh := congrArg isSet h; simp at hh cases φ <;> cases ψ <;> simp [Form.value_atom,atom_injective.eq_iff,hn] omit [DecidableEq V] in omit [Fintype I] in theorem represented_base (v : V → Domain (A := A) G s) (w : V → Domain (A := B) H s) (h : Represented S T ef e2 v w) (r : R) (i j : V) : (hfStructure S).rel (.base r) (v i) (v j) ↔ (hfStructure T).rel (.base r) (w i) (w j) := by obtain ⟨φ,a,b,ha,hb,ht⟩ := h change (∃ x y, (v i).1 = Hereditary.atom x ∧ (v j).1 = Hereditary.atom y ∧ S.rel r x y) ↔ (∃ x y, (w i).1 = Hereditary.atom x ∧ (w j).1 = Hereditary.atom y ∧ T.rel r x y) rw [←ha i,←ha j,←hb i,←hb j,base_value S e2,base_value T e2] cases hi : φ i with | set n child label => simp | atom k => cases hj : φ j with | set n child label => simp | atom l => have he := (typeOf_eq_iff S T (tupleNames ef) _ _).mp ht (.relation r (ef (i,k)) (ef (j,l))) (by intro p hp simp only [Formula.free,Finset.mem_insert,Finset.mem_singleton] at hp rcases hp with rfl | rfl <;> exact (mem_tupleNames _ _).mpr ⟨_,rfl⟩) simpa only [Formula.eval,tupleAssignment_apply] using he omit [Fintype V] in @[simp] theorem splitBlock_symm_new (i : V) (k : Fin s) : (splitBlock (s := s) i).symm (i,k) = .inr k := by simp [splitBlock] omit [Fintype V] in @[simp] theorem splitBlock_symm_old (i j : V) (h : j ≠ i) (k : Fin s) : (splitBlock (s := s) i).symm (j,k) = .inl (⟨j,h⟩,k) := by simp [splitBlock,h] omit [Fintype I] [Fintype A] in private theorem homogeneity_reindex {J K : Type*} [Fintype J] [Fintype K] (S : Structure R A) (e : J ↪ I) (f : K ↪ I) (u : K ≃ J) (hh : ∀ a b : J → A, tupleType S e a = tupleType S e b → ∃ g : G, ∀ j, g • a j = b j) : ∀ a b : K → A, tupleType S f a = tupleType S f b → ∃ g : G, ∀ j, g • a j = b j := by intro a b hab have h := tupleType_project S S f e u.symm.toEmbedding a b hab obtain ⟨g,hg⟩ := hh _ _ h exact ⟨g,fun j => by simpa using hg (u j)⟩ variable (eplus : (V × Fin s) ⊕ Fin s ↪ I) variable (hAutA : ∀ (g : G) r a b, S.rel r (g • a) (g • b) ↔ S.rel r a b) variable (hAutB : ∀ (g : H) r a b, T.rel r (g • a) (g • b) ↔ T.rel r a b) include eplus e3 e4 hAutA hAutB in theorem represented_extension (hs : 0 < s) (hHomA2 : ∀ a b : Fin s ⊕ Fin s → A, tupleType S e2 a = tupleType S e2 b → ∃ g : G, ∀ i, g • a i = b i) (hHomB2 : ∀ a b : Fin s ⊕ Fin s → B, tupleType T e2 a = tupleType T e2 b → ∃ g : H, ∀ i, g • a i = b i) (hHomA : ∀ a b : V × Fin s → A, tupleType S ef a = tupleType S ef b → ∃ g : G, ∀ i, g • a i = b i) (hHomB : ∀ a b : V × Fin s → B, tupleType T ef a = tupleType T ef b → ∃ g : H, ∀ i, g • a i = b i) (v : V → Domain (A := A) G s) (w : V → Domain (A := B) H s) (h : Represented S T ef e2 v w) (i : V) : ∃ f : Domain (A := A) G s ≃ Domain (A := B) H s, ∀ x, Represented S T ef e2 (Function.update v i x) (Function.update w i (f x)) := by obtain ⟨φ,a,b,ha,hb,ht⟩ := h let P := {j : V // j ≠ i} × Fin s let u : P ⊕ Fin s ≃ V × Fin s := splitBlock i let ep := u.toEmbedding.trans ef let epp := (Equiv.sumCongr u (Equiv.refl (Fin s))).toEmbedding.trans eplus let e0 := Function.Embedding.inl.trans ep let keep : P ↪ V × Fin s := Function.Embedding.inl.trans u.toEmbedding let p : P → A := a ∘ keep let q : P → B := b ∘ keep have hp : tupleType S e0 p = tupleType T e0 q := tupleType_project S T ef e0 keep a b ht have homA := homogeneity_reindex S ef ep u hHomA have homB := homogeneity_reindex T ef ep u hHomB obtain ⟨f,hf⟩ := supported_domain_bijection S T ep epp e2 e3 e4 hAutA hAutB hs e0 hHomA2 hHomB2 homA homB p q hp refine ⟨f,fun x => ?_⟩ obtain ⟨ψ,c,d,hc,hd,hcd⟩ := hf x let a' := Sum.elim p c ∘ u.symm let b' := Sum.elim q d ∘ u.symm refine ⟨Function.update φ i ψ,a',b',?_,?_,?_⟩ · intro j by_cases hj : j = i · subst j simpa [a',u,Function.comp_def,splitBlock] using hc · simpa [a',u,p,keep,Function.comp_def,splitBlock_symm_old i j hj, Function.update_of_ne hj,splitBlock,hj] using ha j · intro j by_cases hj : j = i · subst j simpa [b',u,Function.comp_def,splitBlock] using hd · simpa [b',u,q,keep,Function.comp_def,splitBlock_symm_old i j hj, Function.update_of_ne hj,splitBlock,hj] using hb j · exact tupleType_project S T ep ef u.symm.toEmbedding _ _ hcd include eplus e3 e4 hAutA hAutB in theorem supported_eval_transfer (hs : 0 < s) (hHomA2 : ∀ a b : Fin s ⊕ Fin s → A, tupleType S e2 a = tupleType S e2 b → ∃ g : G, ∀ i, g • a i = b i) (hHomB2 : ∀ a b : Fin s ⊕ Fin s → B, tupleType T e2 a = tupleType T e2 b → ∃ g : H, ∀ i, g • a i = b i) (hHomA : ∀ a b : V × Fin s → A, tupleType S ef a = tupleType S ef b → ∃ g : G, ∀ i, g • a i = b i) (hHomB : ∀ a b : V × Fin s → B, tupleType T ef a = tupleType T ef b → ∃ g : H, ∀ i, g • a i = b i) (φ : Formula (HFRelation R) V) (v : V → Domain (A := A) G s) (w : V → Domain (A := B) H s) (h : Represented S T ef e2 v w) : φ.eval (hfStructure S) v ↔ φ.eval (hfStructure T) w := by apply Formula.eval_of_bijectionSystem (hfStructure S) (hfStructure T) (Represented S T ef e2) _ _ _ φ v w h · exact represented_equal S T ef e2 e3 e4 · intro v w h r i j cases r with | mem => exact represented_mem S T ef e2 e3 e4 v w h i j | atom => exact represented_atom S T ef e2 v w h i | base r => exact represented_base S T ef e2 v w h r i j · exact represented_extension S T ef e2 e3 e4 eplus hAutA hAutB hs hHomA2 hHomB2 hHomA hHomB include eplus e3 e4 hAutA hAutB in theorem supported_sentences_transfer (hs : 0 < s) (hHomA2 : ∀ a b : Fin s ⊕ Fin s → A, tupleType S e2 a = tupleType S e2 b → ∃ g : G, ∀ i, g • a i = b i) (hHomB2 : ∀ a b : Fin s ⊕ Fin s → B, tupleType T e2 a = tupleType T e2 b → ∃ g : H, ∀ i, g • a i = b i) (hHomA : ∀ a b : V × Fin s → A, tupleType S ef a = tupleType S ef b → ∃ g : G, ∀ i, g • a i = b i) (hHomB : ∀ a b : V × Fin s → B, tupleType T ef a = tupleType T ef b → ∃ g : H, ∀ i, g • a i = b i) (hbase : tupleType S (Function.Embedding.ofIsEmpty : Empty ↪ I) Empty.elim = tupleType T (Function.Embedding.ofIsEmpty : Empty ↪ I) Empty.elim) (φ : Formula (HFRelation R) V) (hφ : φ.free = ∅) (v : V → Domain (A := A) G s) (w : V → Domain (A := B) H s) : φ.eval (hfStructure S) v ↔ φ.eval (hfStructure T) w := by let a : V × Fin s → A := fun _ => Classical.choice inferInstance have he : tupleType S (Function.Embedding.ofIsEmpty : Empty ↪ I) (a ∘ (Function.Embedding.ofIsEmpty : Empty ↪ V × Fin s)) = tupleType T (Function.Embedding.ofIsEmpty : Empty ↪ I) Empty.elim := by convert hbase using 1 congr 1; funext x; exact x.elim obtain ⟨b,_,hab⟩ := tupleType_extend S T (Function.Embedding.ofIsEmpty : Empty ↪ I) ef (Function.Embedding.ofIsEmpty : Empty ↪ V × Fin s) a Empty.elim he let emptyForm : Form (Fin s) (Set (Formula R I)) := .set 0 Fin.elim0 Fin.elim0 let v' : V → Domain (A := A) G s := fun i => ⟨Form.value S e2 emptyForm (fun j => a (i,j)), value_hereditarily_supported S e2 hAutA emptyForm _⟩ let w' : V → Domain (A := B) H s := fun i => ⟨Form.value T e2 emptyForm (fun j => b (i,j)), value_hereditarily_supported T e2 hAutB emptyForm _⟩ have hr : Represented S T ef e2 v' w' := ⟨(fun _ => emptyForm),a,b,(fun _ => rfl),(fun _ => rfl),hab⟩ have hh := supported_eval_transfer S T ef e2 e3 e4 eplus hAutA hAutB hs hHomA2 hHomB2 hHomA hHomB φ v' w' hr exact (Formula.eval_congr _ φ (fun i hi => by simp [hφ] at hi)).trans (hh.trans (Formula.eval_congr _ φ (fun i hi => by simp [hφ] at hi))) def namesOfCard {J : Type*} [Fintype J] {M : ℕ} (h : Fintype.card J ≤ M) : J ↪ Fin M := (Fintype.equivFin J).toEmbedding.trans (Fin.castLEEmb h) def HomogeneousThrough (S : Structure R A) (G : Type*) [Group G] [MulAction G A] (M r : ℕ) : Prop := ∀ k ≤ r, ∀ e : Fin k ↪ Fin M, ∀ a b : Fin k → A, tupleType S e a = tupleType S e b → ∃ g : G, ∀ j, g • a j = b j omit [Fintype A] in private theorem homogeneous_tuple {J : Type*} [Fintype J] {M r : ℕ} (S : Structure R A) (G : Type*) [Group G] [MulAction G A] (h : HomogeneousThrough S G M r) (e : J ↪ Fin M) (hc : Fintype.card J ≤ r) : ∀ a b : J → A, tupleType S e a = tupleType S e b → ∃ g : G, ∀ j, g • a j = b j := by exact homogeneity_reindex S ((Fintype.equivFin J).symm.toEmbedding.trans e) e (Fintype.equivFin J) (h _ hc _) theorem hf_transfer {m M : ℕ} (hs : 0 < s) (_hm : 0 < m) (hM : 0 < M) (hwidth : max 4 (m+1) * s ≤ M) (hAutA : ∀ (g : G) r a b, S.rel r (g • a) (g • b) ↔ S.rel r a b) (hAutB : ∀ (g : H) r a b, T.rel r (g • a) (g • b) ↔ T.rel r a b) (hHomA : HomogeneousThrough S G M (max 2 m * s)) (hHomB : HomogeneousThrough T H M (max 2 m * s)) (hbase : tupleType S (Function.Embedding.ofIsEmpty : Empty ↪ Fin M) Empty.elim = tupleType T (Function.Embedding.ofIsEmpty : Empty ↪ Fin M) Empty.elim) (φ : Formula (HFRelation R) (Fin m)) (hφ : φ.free = ∅) (v : Fin m → Domain (A := A) G s) (w : Fin m → Domain (A := B) H s) : φ.eval (hfStructure S) v ↔ φ.eval (hfStructure T) w := by have h4 : 4*s ≤ M := (Nat.mul_le_mul_right s (le_max_left _ _)).trans hwidth have hp : (m+1)*s ≤ M := (Nat.mul_le_mul_right s (le_max_right _ _)).trans hwidth have h2 : Fintype.card (Fin s ⊕ Fin s) ≤ M := by simp only [Fintype.card_sum,Fintype.card_fin]; omega have h3 : Fintype.card ((Fin s ⊕ Fin s) ⊕ Fin s) ≤ M := by simp only [Fintype.card_sum,Fintype.card_fin]; omega have h4' : Fintype.card (((Fin s ⊕ Fin s) ⊕ Fin s) ⊕ Fin s) ≤ M := by simp only [Fintype.card_sum,Fintype.card_fin]; omega have hpf : Fintype.card ((Fin m × Fin s) ⊕ Fin s) ≤ M := by simpa [Nat.add_mul] using hp have hfull : Fintype.card (Fin m × Fin s) ≤ M := by simp only [Fintype.card_prod,Fintype.card_fin]; nlinarith have hom2 : Fintype.card (Fin s ⊕ Fin s) ≤ max 2 m*s := by simpa [two_mul] using Nat.mul_le_mul_right s (le_max_left 2 m) have homf : Fintype.card (Fin m × Fin s) ≤ max 2 m*s := by simpa using Nat.mul_le_mul_right s (le_max_right 2 m) exact supported_sentences_transfer S T (namesOfCard hfull) (namesOfCard h2) (namesOfCard h3) (namesOfCard h4') (namesOfCard hpf) hAutA hAutB hs (homogeneous_tuple S G hHomA _ hom2) (homogeneous_tuple T H hHomB _ hom2) (homogeneous_tuple S G hHomA _ homf) (homogeneous_tuple T H hHomB _ homf) hbase φ hφ v w end end WitnessedSeparation.Forms namespace WitnessedSeparation.Hereditary noncomputable section variable {A G : Type*} [Group G] [MulAction G A] theorem supports_pad {k s : ℕ} (hks : k ≤ s) (a₀ : A) (alpha : Fin k → A) {x : HF A} (h : Supports (G := G) alpha x) : Supported (G := G) s x := by classical let beta (i : Fin s) : A := if hi : i.val < k then alpha ⟨i.val,hi⟩ else a₀ refine ⟨beta,?_⟩ intro g hg apply h g intro i have hi := hg (i.castLE hks) simpa only [beta, Fin.val_castLE, dite_eq_left i.isLt] using hi end end WitnessedSeparation.Hereditary namespace WitnessedSeparation.Grid open Support Hereditary noncomputable section variable {n : ℕ} {b : Vertex n → Scalar} @[simp] theorem central_smul_HF (k : CentralGroup n) (x : HF (Atom b)) : k • x = centralHom k • x := rfl theorem small_orbit_supported (hn : 1 ≤ n) (x : HF (Atom b)) (N : ℕ) (hN : 0 < N) (q : ℝ) (hq : 0 ≤ q) (horbit : (Nat.card (MulAction.orbit (BoxGroup n) x) : ℝ) ≤ (N : ℝ)^q) : Supported (G := CentralGroup n) ⌈2 * (n+1 : ℝ) * (q * Real.logb 3 N)^2⌉₊ x := by classical obtain ⟨T,hT,hfix⟩ := small_orbit_support_edges x N hN q hq horbit obtain ⟨alpha,ha⟩ := edge_support_tuple (b := b) T x hfix have hsupport : Supports (G := CentralGroup n) alpha x := by intro k hk exact ha k hk have hlen : T.card ≤ ⌈2 * (n+1 : ℝ) * (q * Real.logb 3 N)^2⌉₊ := by exact_mod_cast le_trans hT (Nat.le_ceil _) let a₀ : Atom b := zeroEdgeAtom b (ex ⟨0,by omega⟩ 0 0) exact supports_pad hlen a₀ alpha hsupport theorem orbit_card_le_invariant_family (F : Finset (HF (Atom b))) (hF : ∀ g : BoxGroup n, ∀ x ∈ F, g • x ∈ F) {x : HF (Atom b)} (hx : x ∈ F) : Nat.card (MulAction.orbit (BoxGroup n) x) ≤ F.card := by classical let f : MulAction.orbit (BoxGroup n) x → {y // y ∈ F} := fun y => ⟨y.val,by obtain ⟨g,hg⟩ := y.property; rw [← hg]; exact hF g x hx⟩ have hf : Function.Injective f := by intro a c h exact Subtype.ext (congrArg (fun z : {y // y ∈ F} => z.val) h) have hn := Nat.card_le_card_of_injective f hf simpa only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_coe] using hn theorem invariant_family_hereditarily_supported (hn : 1 ≤ n) (F : Finset (HF (Atom b))) (hF : ∀ g : BoxGroup n, ∀ x ∈ F, g • x ∈ F) (htrans : ∀ x ∈ F, ∀ y, y ∈ x → y ∈ F) (N : ℕ) (hN : 0 < N) (q : ℝ) (hq : 0 ≤ q) (hsize : (F.card : ℝ) ≤ (N : ℝ)^q) : ∀ x ∈ F, HereditarilySupported (G := CentralGroup n) ⌈2 * (n+1 : ℝ) * (q * Real.logb 3 N)^2⌉₊ x := by intro x hx y hy have hymem : y ∈ F := by induction hy with | refl => exact hx | @tail z w hpath hmem ih => exact ih (htrans w hx z hmem) apply small_orbit_supported hn y N hN q hq exact le_trans (by exact_mod_cast orbit_card_le_invariant_family F hF hymem) hsize end end WitnessedSeparation.Grid namespace WitnessedSeparation.Grid noncomputable section open Classical Finset variable {n M m s : ℕ} {b : Vertex n → Scalar} theorem atom_nonempty (hn : 1 ≤ n) (b : Vertex n → Scalar) : Nonempty (Atom b) := ⟨.inr ⟨(0,0,0),someConfiguration hn b (0,0,0)⟩⟩ instance atom_nonempty_succ (b : Vertex (n+1) → Scalar) : Nonempty (Atom b) := atom_nonempty (by omega) b theorem central_analysis_isomorphism (k : CentralGroup n) (r : AnalysisSymbol) (x y : Atom b) : (analysisStructure b).rel r (k • x) (k • y) ↔ (analysisStructure b).rel r x y := ((central_atomShift k x).analysisRelation (central_atomShift k y) r).symm theorem homogeneous_through_numeric (hn : 1 ≤ n) [Nonempty (Atom b)] (R : ℕ) (hw : (7*R:ℝ)+7*((6*R:ℝ)/boxConstant)^((3:ℝ)/2)+1 ≤ M) : Forms.HomogeneousThrough (analysisStructure b) (CentralGroup n) M R := by intro k hk names a a' ht apply quantitative_homogeneity hn names a a' _ ht simp only [Fintype.card_fin] have hkr : (k:ℝ) ≤ R := by exact_mod_cast hk have hp : ((6*k:ℝ)/boxConstant)^((3:ℝ)/2) ≤ ((6*R:ℝ)/boxConstant)^((3:ℝ)/2) := by apply Real.rpow_le_rpow (div_nonneg (by positivity) boxConstant_pos.le) _ (by norm_num) exact div_le_div_of_nonneg_right (by linarith) boxConstant_pos.le linarith theorem base_empty_type (hn : 1 ≤ n) (hbound : GiantBound n M) (vstar : Vertex n) [Nonempty (Atom (0 : Vertex n → Scalar))] [Nonempty (Atom (Pi.single vstar 1))] : Counting.tupleType (analysisStructure (0 : Vertex n → Scalar)) (Function.Embedding.ofIsEmpty : Empty ↪ Fin M) Empty.elim = Counting.tupleType (analysisStructure (Pi.single vstar 1)) (Function.Embedding.ofIsEmpty : Empty ↪ Fin M) Empty.elim := by apply (Counting.typeOf_eq_iff _ _ _ _ _).mpr intro φ hφ have he : φ.free = ∅ := by apply subset_empty.mp simpa only [Counting.tupleNames,Finset.univ_eq_empty,Finset.map_empty] using hφ exact base_equivalence_numeric hn hbound vstar φ he _ _ theorem grid_hf_transfer (hn : 1 ≤ n) (hs : 0 < s) (hm : 0 < m) (vstar : Vertex n) [Nonempty (Atom (0 : Vertex n → Scalar))] [Nonempty (Atom (Pi.single vstar 1))] (hwidth : max 4 (m+1)*s ≤ M) (hhom : (7*(max 2 m*s):ℝ)+7*((6*(max 2 m*s):ℝ)/boxConstant)^((3:ℝ)/2)+1 ≤ M) (hgiant : GiantBound n M) (φ : Counting.Formula (Forms.HFRelation AnalysisSymbol) (Fin m)) (hφ : φ.free = ∅) (v : Fin m → Forms.Domain (A := Atom (0 : Vertex n → Scalar)) (CentralGroup n) s) (w : Fin m → Forms.Domain (A := Atom (Pi.single vstar 1)) (CentralGroup n) s) : φ.eval (Forms.hfStructure (analysisStructure (0 : Vertex n → Scalar))) v ↔ φ.eval (Forms.hfStructure (analysisStructure (Pi.single vstar 1))) w := by have hM : 0 < M := lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.mul_pos (by omega) hs) hwidth exact Forms.hf_transfer _ _ hs hm hM hwidth (fun g r a b => central_analysis_isomorphism g r a b) (fun g r a b => central_analysis_isomorphism g r a b) (homogeneous_through_numeric hn _ (by simpa only [Nat.cast_mul] using hhom)) (homogeneous_through_numeric hn _ (by simpa only [Nat.cast_mul] using hhom)) (base_empty_type hn hgiant vstar) φ hφ v w end end WitnessedSeparation.Grid namespace WitnessedSeparation.Interpretations structure Structure (R : Type) where Carrier : Type finite : Fintype Carrier rel : R → Carrier → Carrier → Bool attribute [instance] Structure.finite inductive Formula (R : Type) : ℕ → Type | falsum {n} : Formula R n | eq {n} (x y : Fin n) : Formula R n | rel {n} (r : R) (x y : Fin n) : Formula R n | neg {n} : Formula R n → Formula R n | and {n} : Formula R n → Formula R n → Formula R n | ex {n} : Formula R (n+1) → Formula R n | hartig {n} : Formula R (n+1) → Formula R (n+1) → Formula R n noncomputable def Formula.eval {R : Type} (A : Structure R) : {n : ℕ} → Formula R n → (Fin n → A.Carrier) → Prop | _, .falsum, _ => False | _, .eq x y, v => v x = v y | _, .rel r x y, v => A.rel r (v x) (v y) = true | _, .neg φ, v => ¬ φ.eval A v | _, .and φ ψ, v => φ.eval A v ∧ ψ.eval A v | _, .ex φ, v => ∃ a, φ.eval A (Fin.cons a v) | _, .hartig φ ψ, v => Nat.card {a : A.Carrier // φ.eval A (Fin.cons a v)} = Nat.card {a : A.Carrier // ψ.eval A (Fin.cons a v)} def Formula.holds {R : Type} (φ : Formula R 0) (A : Structure R) : Prop := φ.eval A Fin.elim0 structure Interpretation (R T : Type) where domain : Formula R 2 identify : Formula R 4 relation : T → Formula R 4 namespace Interpretation variable {R T : Type} (I : Interpretation R T) (A : Structure R) abbrev Domain := {a : A.Carrier × A.Carrier // I.domain.eval A ![a.1,a.2]} def link (a b : I.Domain A) : Prop := I.identify.eval A ![a.val.1,a.val.2,b.val.1,b.val.2] def classSetoid : Setoid (I.Domain A) := Relation.EqvGen.setoid (I.link A) abbrev Vertex := Quotient (I.classSetoid A) noncomputable def apply : Structure T := by classical letI : Fintype (I.Domain A) := Fintype.ofFinite _ letI : Fintype (I.Vertex A) := Fintype.ofFinite _ exact { Carrier := I.Vertex A finite := inferInstance rel := fun r x y => decide (∃ a b : I.Domain A, Quotient.mk (I.classSetoid A) a = x ∧ Quotient.mk (I.classSetoid A) b = y ∧ (I.relation r).eval A ![a.val.1,a.val.2,b.val.1,b.val.2]) } end Interpretation structure Program (InputSymbols : Type) where StateSymbols : Type stateFinite : Fintype StateSymbols init : Interpretation InputSymbols StateSymbols step : Interpretation StateSymbols StateSymbols halt : Formula StateSymbols 0 output : Formula StateSymbols 0 namespace Program variable {R : Type} (P : Program R) noncomputable def state (A : Structure R) : ℕ → Structure P.StateSymbols | 0 => P.init.apply A | j+1 => P.step.apply (state A j) def haltsAt (A : Structure R) (j : ℕ) : Prop := P.halt.holds (P.state A j) ∧ ∀ k < j, ¬ P.halt.holds (P.state A k) noncomputable def cost (A : Structure R) (j : ℕ) : ℕ := (j+1) + ∑ k ∈ Finset.range (j+1), Fintype.card (P.state A k).Carrier def accepts (A : Structure R) : Prop := ∃ j, P.haltsAt A j ∧ P.output.holds (P.state A j) def polynomiallyBounded : Prop := ∃ c d : ℕ, ∀ A : Structure R, ∃ j, P.haltsAt A j ∧ P.cost A j ≤ c * (Fintype.card A.Carrier + 1)^d def decides (Q : Structure R → Prop) : Prop := P.polynomiallyBounded ∧ ∀ A, P.accepts A ↔ Q A end Program def NondefinableByInterpretations {R : Type} (Q : Structure R → Prop) : Prop := ¬ ∃ P : Program R, P.decides Q end WitnessedSeparation.Interpretations namespace WitnessedSeparation.Interpretations noncomputable section open Classical Finset Hereditary variable {R T A : Type} (I : Interpretation R T) (S : Structure R) def payload (e : S.Carrier → HF A) (C : I.Vertex S) : HF A := ofFinset ((univ.filter (fun p : I.Domain S => Quotient.mk (I.classSetoid S) p = C)).image (fun p => pair (e p.val.1) (e p.val.2))) theorem mem_payload (e : S.Carrier → HF A) (C : I.Vertex S) (x : HF A) : x ∈ payload I S e C ↔ ∃ p : I.Domain S, Quotient.mk (I.classSetoid S) p = C ∧ x = pair (e p.val.1) (e p.val.2) := by simp only [payload,mem_ofFinset,mem_image,mem_filter,mem_univ,true_and] exact exists_congr (fun p => and_congr_right (fun _ => eq_comm)) theorem payload_injective (e : S.Carrier → HF A) (he : Function.Injective e) : Function.Injective (payload I S e) := by intro C D h obtain ⟨p,rfl⟩ := Quotient.exists_rep C have hm : pair (e p.val.1) (e p.val.2) ∈ payload I S e (Quotient.mk _ p) := (mem_payload I S e _ _).mpr ⟨p,rfl,rfl⟩ rw [h] at hm obtain ⟨q,hq,hpq⟩ := (mem_payload I S e D _).mp hm have hh := pair_injective hpq have heq : p = q := Subtype.ext (Prod.ext (he hh.1) (he hh.2)) rw [heq] exact hq def vertexCode (e : S.Carrier → HF A) (j : ℕ) (C : I.Vertex S) : HF A := pair (ordinal j) (payload I S e C) theorem vertexCode_injective (e : S.Carrier → HF A) (he : Function.Injective e) (j : ℕ) : Function.Injective (vertexCode I S e j) := by intro C D h exact payload_injective I S e he (pair_injective h).2 def pairFamily (e : S.Carrier → HF A) : Finset (HF A) := univ.biUnion (fun p : I.Domain S => wrappers (e p.val.1) (e p.val.2)) def classFamily (e : S.Carrier → HF A) (j : ℕ) : Finset (HF A) := univ.biUnion (fun C : I.Vertex S => insert (payload I S e C) (wrappers (ordinal j) (payload I S e C))) theorem pairFamily_card_le (e : S.Carrier → HF A) : (pairFamily I S e).card ≤ 3*Fintype.card S.Carrier^2 := by calc (pairFamily I S e).card ≤ ∑ p : I.Domain S, (wrappers (e p.val.1) (e p.val.2)).card := card_biUnion_le _ ≤ ∑ _p : I.Domain S, 3 := sum_le_sum (fun p _ => wrappers_card_le _ _) _ = 3*Fintype.card (I.Domain S) := by simp [mul_comm] _ ≤ 3*Fintype.card S.Carrier^2 := by apply Nat.mul_le_mul_left have h := Fintype.card_subtype_le (fun p : S.Carrier × S.Carrier => I.domain.eval S ![p.1,p.2]) simpa only [Fintype.card_prod,pow_two] using h theorem classFamily_card_le (e : S.Carrier → HF A) (j : ℕ) : (classFamily I S e j).card ≤ 4*Fintype.card (I.Vertex S) := by calc (classFamily I S e j).card ≤ ∑ C : I.Vertex S, (insert (payload I S e C) (wrappers (ordinal j) (payload I S e C))).card := card_biUnion_le _ ≤ ∑ _C : I.Vertex S, 4 := by apply sum_le_sum intro C _ exact (card_insert_le _ _).trans (by have := wrappers_card_le (ordinal (A := A) j) (payload I S e C); omega) _ = 4*Fintype.card (I.Vertex S) := by simp [mul_comm] theorem stage_family_transitive (e : S.Carrier → HF A) (j : ℕ) (F : Finset (HF A)) (hF : ∀ x ∈ F, ∀ y, y ∈ x → y ∈ F) (he : ∀ a, e a ∈ F) (hj : ordinal j ∈ F) : ∀ x ∈ F ∪ pairFamily I S e ∪ classFamily I S e j, ∀ y, y ∈ x → y ∈ F ∪ pairFamily I S e ∪ classFamily I S e j := by intro x hx y hy have incF : F ⊆ F ∪ pairFamily I S e ∪ classFamily I S e j := fun z hz => mem_union_left _ (mem_union_left _ hz) have incP : pairFamily I S e ⊆ F ∪ pairFamily I S e ∪ classFamily I S e j := fun z hz => mem_union_left _ (mem_union_right _ hz) have incC : classFamily I S e j ⊆ F ∪ pairFamily I S e ∪ classFamily I S e j := fun z hz => mem_union_right _ hz rcases mem_union.mp hx with hx|hx · rcases mem_union.mp hx with hx|hx · exact incF (hF x hx y hy) · obtain ⟨p,_,hp⟩ := mem_biUnion.mp hx rcases wrappers_trans hp hy with h|h|h · rw [h]; exact incF (he _) · rw [h]; exact incF (he _) · exact incP (mem_biUnion.mpr ⟨p,mem_univ _,h⟩) · obtain ⟨C,_,hC⟩ := mem_biUnion.mp hx rcases mem_insert.mp hC with rfl|hC · obtain ⟨p,hp,hyp⟩ := (mem_payload I S e C y).mp hy apply incP apply mem_biUnion.mpr exact ⟨p,mem_univ _,by simp [hyp,wrappers]⟩ · rcases wrappers_trans hC hy with h|h|h · rw [h]; exact incF hj · rw [h]; exact incC (mem_biUnion.mpr ⟨C,mem_univ _,mem_insert_self _ _⟩) · exact incC (mem_biUnion.mpr ⟨C,mem_univ _,mem_insert_of_mem h⟩) end end WitnessedSeparation.Interpretations namespace WitnessedSeparation.Counting noncomputable section open Classical Finset variable {R D : Type*} (S : Structure R D) {m n k : ℕ} def Definable (m n : ℕ) (P : (Fin n → D) → Prop) : Prop := ∀ args : Fin n → Fin m, ∃ φ : Formula R (Fin m), φ.free ⊆ univ.image args ∧ ∀ v, φ.eval S v ↔ P (v ∘ args) namespace Definable variable {S} {P Q : (Fin n → D) → Prop} theorem congr (h : Definable S m n P) (heq : ∀ v, P v ↔ Q v) : Definable S m n Q := by intro args obtain ⟨φ,hφ,he⟩ := h args exact ⟨φ,hφ,fun v => (he v).trans (heq _)⟩ theorem reindex (h : Definable S m n P) (f : Fin n → Fin k) : Definable S m k (fun v => P (v ∘ f)) := by intro args obtain ⟨φ,hφ,he⟩ := h (args ∘ f) refine ⟨φ,?_,fun v => he v⟩ intro i hi obtain ⟨j,_,rfl⟩ := mem_image.mp (hφ hi) exact mem_image.mpr ⟨f j,mem_univ _,rfl⟩ theorem falsum : Definable S m n (fun _ => False) := by intro args exact ⟨.falsum,by simp [Formula.free],fun _ => Iff.rfl⟩ theorem neg (h : Definable S m n P) : Definable S m n (fun v => ¬ P v) := by intro args obtain ⟨φ,hφ,he⟩ := h args exact ⟨.neg φ,hφ,fun v => not_congr (he v)⟩ theorem and (h : Definable S m n P) (h' : Definable S m n Q) : Definable S m n (fun v => P v ∧ Q v) := by intro args obtain ⟨φ,hφ,he⟩ := h args obtain ⟨ψ,hψ,he'⟩ := h' args exact ⟨.and φ ψ,union_subset hφ hψ,fun v => and_congr (he v) (he' v)⟩ theorem or (h : Definable S m n P) (h' : Definable S m n Q) : Definable S m n (fun v => P v ∨ Q v) := (h.neg.and h'.neg).neg.congr (fun _ => by tauto) theorem imp (h : Definable S m n P) (h' : Definable S m n Q) : Definable S m n (fun v => P v → Q v) := (h.neg.or h').congr (fun _ => by tauto) theorem iff (h : Definable S m n P) (h' : Definable S m n Q) : Definable S m n (fun v => P v ↔ Q v) := ((h.imp h').and (h'.imp h)).congr (fun _ => by tauto) theorem equal (i j : Fin n) : Definable S m n (fun v => v i = v j) := by intro args refine ⟨.equal (args i) (args j),?_,fun _ => Iff.rfl⟩ simp only [Formula.free,insert_subset_iff,singleton_subset_iff] exact ⟨mem_image.mpr ⟨i,mem_univ _,rfl⟩,mem_image.mpr ⟨j,mem_univ _,rfl⟩⟩ theorem relation (r : R) (i j : Fin n) : Definable S m n (fun v => S.rel r (v i) (v j)) := by intro args refine ⟨.relation r (args i) (args j),?_,fun _ => Iff.rfl⟩ simp only [Formula.free,insert_subset_iff,singleton_subset_iff] exact ⟨mem_image.mpr ⟨i,mem_univ _,rfl⟩,mem_image.mpr ⟨j,mem_univ _,rfl⟩⟩ private theorem fresh (args : Fin n → Fin m) (hn : n < m) : ∃ i, ∀ j, args j ≠ i := by have hns : ¬ Function.Surjective args := by intro hs have h := Fintype.card_le_of_surjective args hs simp only [Fintype.card_fin] at h omega simp only [Function.Surjective] at hns push Not at hns exact hns private theorem updated_args (args : Fin n → Fin m) (i : Fin m) (hi : ∀ j, args j ≠ i) (v : Fin m → D) (x : D) : Function.update v i x ∘ Fin.cons i args = Fin.cons x (v ∘ args) := by funext j refine Fin.cases ?_ (fun j => ?_) j · simp · simp [hi j] private theorem free_binder {args : Fin n → Fin m} {i : Fin m} {φ : Formula R (Fin m)} (hφ : φ.free ⊆ univ.image (Fin.cons i args)) : φ.free.erase i ⊆ univ.image args := by intro j hj obtain ⟨k,_,hk⟩ := mem_image.mp (hφ (mem_erase.mp hj).2) cases k using Fin.cases with | zero => simp only [Fin.cons_zero] at hk exact False.elim ((mem_erase.mp hj).1 hk.symm) | succ k => exact mem_image.mpr ⟨k,mem_univ _,hk⟩ theorem ex {P : (Fin (n+1) → D) → Prop} (h : Definable S m (n+1) P) (hn : n < m) : Definable S m n (fun v => ∃ x, P (Fin.cons x v)) := by intro args obtain ⟨i,hi⟩ := fresh args hn obtain ⟨φ,hφ,he⟩ := h (Fin.cons i args) refine ⟨.ex i φ,free_binder hφ,?_⟩ intro v apply exists_congr intro x simpa only [updated_args args i hi] using he (Function.update v i x) theorem all {P : (Fin (n+1) → D) → Prop} (h : Definable S m (n+1) P) (hn : n < m) : Definable S m n (fun v => ∀ x, P (Fin.cons x v)) := (h.neg.ex hn).neg.congr (fun _ => by simp) theorem exact {P : (Fin (n+1) → D) → Prop} (h : Definable S m (n+1) P) (hn : n < m) (k : ℕ) : Definable S m n (fun v => Nonempty ({x : D // P (Fin.cons x v)} ≃ Fin k)) := by intro args obtain ⟨i,hi⟩ := fresh args hn obtain ⟨φ,hφ,he⟩ := h (Fin.cons i args) refine ⟨.exact i k φ,free_binder hφ,?_⟩ intro v let e : {x : D // φ.eval S (Function.update v i x)} ≃ {x : D // P (Fin.cons x (v ∘ args))} := Equiv.subtypeEquivRight (fun x => by simpa only [updated_args args i hi] using he (Function.update v i x)) exact ⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨e.symm.trans f⟩,fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨e.trans f⟩⟩ theorem exists_finset {ι : Type*} {P : ι → (Fin n → D) → Prop} (t : Finset ι) (h : ∀ i ∈ t, Definable S m n (P i)) : Definable S m n (fun v => ∃ i ∈ t, P i v) := by induction t using Finset.induction_on with | empty => exact (falsum (S := S)).congr (fun _ => by simp) | @insert i t hi ih => exact ((h i (mem_insert_self _ _)).or (ih (fun j hj => h j (mem_insert_of_mem hj)))).congr (fun v => by simp only [mem_insert,exists_eq_or_imp]) theorem bounded_hartig {P Q : (Fin (n+1) → D) → Prop} (hP : Definable S m (n+1) P) (hQ : Definable S m (n+1) Q) (hn : n < m) (B : ℕ) : Definable S m n (fun v => ∃ k ≤ B, Nonempty ({x : D // P (Fin.cons x v)} ≃ Fin k) ∧ Nonempty ({x : D // Q (Fin.cons x v)} ≃ Fin k)) := by apply (exists_finset (range (B+1)) (fun k _ => (hP.exact hn k).and (hQ.exact hn k))).congr intro v simp only [mem_range,Nat.lt_succ_iff] end Definable end end WitnessedSeparation.Counting end OAI