import OAI.Dynamics.SmoothObstruction.WordHierarchy namespace OAI section namespace SmoothObstruction.WordFlatten open Finset FiniteLaw WordLaw SequentialLaw variable {A : Type*} [Fintype A] [DecidableEq A] {q H : ℕ} omit [Fintype A] in lemma test_flatten (m : Fin (q*H) → Option A) (w : Fin q → Fin H → A) : test m (flattenEquiv w) = ∏ b, test (fun r => m (finProdFinEquiv (b,r))) (w b) := by unfold test calc _ = ∏ br : Fin q × Fin H, mark (m (finProdFinEquiv br)) (w br.1 br.2) := by simpa only [flattenEquiv, Equiv.coe_fn_mk,Equiv.symm_apply_apply] using (finProdFinEquiv.prod_comp (fun j => mark (m j) (flattenEquiv w j))).symm _ = _ := Fintype.prod_prod_type _ omit [Fintype A] [DecidableEq A] in lemma count_grouped (m : Fin (q*H) → Option A) : (∑ b : Fin q, (univ.filter (fun r : Fin H => (m (finProdFinEquiv (b,r))).isSome)).card) = (univ.filter (fun r => (m r).isSome)).card := by simp only [card_eq_sum_ones, sum_filter] calc _ = ∑ br : Fin q × Fin H, if (m (finProdFinEquiv br)).isSome then 1 else 0 := (Fintype.sum_prod_type (fun br : Fin q × Fin H => if (m (finProdFinEquiv br)).isSome then (1:ℕ) else 0)).symm _ = _ := finProdFinEquiv.sum_comp (fun r => if (m r).isSome then 1 else 0) variable {V : Type*} [AddCommGroup V] [Module (ZMod 2) V] [FiniteDimensional (ZMod 2) V] [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] (B : LinearMap.BilinForm (ZMod 2) V) {K : ℕ} omit [FiniteDimensional (ZMod 2) V] in /-- W3 itself: the actual single conditioned law controls every arbitrary partial list, with a single factor two, including lists crossing groups. -/ theorem flat_sublist (hd : K+1 ≤ Module.finrank (ZMod 2) V) (hK : 1 ≤ K) (E : Finset (Fin q → Fin H → {v : V // v ≠ 0})) (hE : 1/2 ≤ prob (rawLaw B hd H q) E) (m : Fin (q*H) → Option {v : V // v ≠ 0}) : expect (flatLaw B hd E hE) (test m) ≤ 2 * ((2 : ℝ)^(2*K) / Fintype.card {v : V // v ≠ 0}) ^ (univ.filter (fun r => (m r).isSome)).card := by unfold flatLaw rw [expect_transport] have ht : ((test m) ∘ flattenEquiv) = (fun w => ∏ b, test (fun r => m (finProdFinEquiv (b,r))) (w b)) := by funext w exact test_flatten m w rw [ht] have hh := conditioned_sublist B hd hK E hE (fun b r => m (finProdFinEquiv (b,r))) simpa only [count_grouped] using hh end SmoothObstruction.WordFlatten namespace SmoothObstruction.FiniteLaw open Finset FiniteEntropy variable {α β γ : Type*} [Fintype α] [Fintype β] [Fintype γ] noncomputable def uniform [Nonempty α] : Law α where mass := fun _ => (Fintype.card α : ℝ)⁻¹ nonneg := fun _ => by positivity total := by simp [Fintype.card_ne_zero] noncomputable def mixture (P : Law α) (Q : α → Law β) : Law β where mass b := ∑ a,P.mass a*(Q a).mass b nonneg b := sum_nonneg (fun a _ => mul_nonneg (P.nonneg a) ((Q a).nonneg b)) total := by rw [sum_comm] simp only [←mul_sum,(Q _).total,mul_one,P.total] noncomputable def TV (P Q : Law α) : ℝ := (1/2:ℝ)*∑ a,|P.mass a-Q.mass a| noncomputable def entropy (P : Law α) : ℝ := natEntropy P.mass lemma TV_nonneg (P Q : Law α) : 0 ≤ TV P Q := by unfold TV; positivity lemma TV_symm (P Q : Law α) : TV P Q=TV Q P := by simp only [TV,abs_sub_comm] lemma TV_triangle (P Q R : Law α) : TV P R ≤ TV P Q+TV Q R := by unfold TV rw [←mul_add,←sum_add_distrib] exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (sum_le_sum (fun a _ => abs_sub_le (P.mass a) (Q.mass a) (R.mass a))) (by norm_num) lemma push_sub [DecidableEq β] (P Q : Law α) (f : α → β) (b : β) : (push P f).mass b-(push Q f).mass b = ∑ a,if f a=b then P.mass a-Q.mass a else 0 := by classical simp only [push,←sum_sub_distrib] apply sum_congr rfl intro a _ split_ifs <;> ring lemma TV_push [DecidableEq β] (P Q : Law α) (f : α → β) : TV (push P f) (push Q f) ≤ TV P Q := by classical unfold TV apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (by norm_num) simp_rw [push_sub] calc _ ≤ ∑ b,∑ a,|if f a=b then P.mass a-Q.mass a else 0| := sum_le_sum (fun b _ => abs_sum_le_sum_abs _ _) _ = ∑ a,|P.mass a-Q.mass a| := by rw [sum_comm] simp only [apply_ite abs,abs_zero,Finset.sum_ite_eq,Finset.mem_univ,ite_true] lemma entropy_nonneg (P : Law α) : 0 ≤ entropy P := FiniteEntropy.entropy_nonneg P.nonneg P.total lemma entropy_mixture (P : Law α) (Q : α → Law β) : ∑ a,P.mass a*entropy (Q a) ≤ entropy (mixture P Q) := FiniteEntropy.entropy_mixture P.mass (fun a => (Q a).mass) P.nonneg P.total (fun a => (Q a).nonneg) lemma entropy_atom_lower (P : Law α) {M : ℝ} (_hM : 0 < M) (h : ∀ a,P.mass a ≤ M) : -Real.log M ≤ entropy P := by have hb (a : α) : P.mass a*(-Real.log M) ≤ Real.negMulLog (P.mass a) := by rcases (P.nonneg a).eq_or_lt with hz|hp · rw [←hz,zero_mul,Real.negMulLog_zero] · have hh := Real.log_le_log hp (h a) rw [Real.negMulLog_def] nlinarith [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hh hp.le] have hs := sum_le_sum (fun a (_ha : a ∈ (univ : Finset α)) => hb a) simpa only [←sum_mul,P.total,one_mul,entropy,natEntropy] using hs /-- Exactly the one-bit TV cost used in source equation (tv-entropy), expressed first in natural units. -/ lemma entropy_tv_lower (P Q : Law α) {s : ℝ} (hs : TV P Q ≤ s) : entropy P-Real.log 2-s*Real.log (Fintype.card α) ≤ entropy Q := by have hcard : 1 ≤ Fintype.card α := by by_contra h have he : IsEmpty α := Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp (by omega) have hh := P.total simp only [univ_eq_empty,sum_empty] at hh norm_num at hh have hc : 0 ≤ Real.log (Fintype.card α) := Real.log_nonneg (by exact_mod_cast hcard) have hh := FiniteEntropy.entropy_tv Q.nonneg P.nonneg Q.total P.total rw [←TV,TV_symm] at hh change entropy P ≤ entropy Q+Real.log 2+TV P Q*Real.log (Fintype.card α) at hh nlinarith [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hs hc] lemma entropy_close_atom_lower (P Q : Law α) {M s : ℝ} (hM : 0 < M) (hP : ∀ a,P.mass a ≤ M) (hs : TV P Q ≤ s) : -Real.log M-Real.log 2-s*Real.log (Fintype.card α) ≤ entropy Q := by have ha := entropy_atom_lower P hM hP have hb := entropy_tv_lower P Q hs linarith /-- Mixtures over arbitrary parent laws retain each admissible-slot bound; only the total exceptional-slot mass is lost. -/ theorem entropy_good_mixture (P : Law α) (Q : α → Law β) (E : Finset α) {L : ℝ} (h : ∀ a ∈ E,L ≤ entropy (Q a)) : (∑ a ∈ E,P.mass a)*L ≤ entropy (mixture P Q) := by classical calc _ = ∑ a ∈ E,P.mass a*L := sum_mul _ _ _ _ ≤ ∑ a ∈ E,P.mass a*entropy (Q a) := sum_le_sum (fun a ha => mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (h a ha) (P.nonneg a)) _ ≤ ∑ a,P.mass a*entropy (Q a) := sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg (subset_univ E) (fun a _ _ => mul_nonneg (P.nonneg a) (entropy_nonneg (Q a))) _ ≤ _ := entropy_mixture P Q end SmoothObstruction.FiniteLaw namespace SmoothObstruction.SequentialLaw open Finset variable {A : Type*} [Fintype A] [DecidableEq A] {q N : ℕ} noncomputable def embeddedMarks (e : Fin q ↪ Fin N) (v : Fin q → A) : Fin N → Option A := fun i => if h : ∃ j, e j=i then some (v h.choose) else none omit [Fintype A] [DecidableEq A] in lemma embeddedMarks_at (e : Fin q ↪ Fin N) (v : Fin q → A) (j : Fin q) : embeddedMarks e v (e j)=some (v j) := by classical have h : ∃ k, e k=e j := ⟨j,rfl⟩ have hc := e.injective h.choose_spec simp only [embeddedMarks,dite_eq_left h,hc] omit [Fintype A] [DecidableEq A] in lemma embeddedMarks_some (e : Fin q ↪ Fin N) (v : Fin q → A) (i : Fin N) (a : A) : embeddedMarks e v i=some a ↔ ∃ j,e j=i ∧ v j=a := by classical constructor · intro h unfold embeddedMarks at h split_ifs at h with hi · exact ⟨hi.choose,hi.choose_spec,Option.some.inj h⟩ · rintro ⟨j,rfl,rfl⟩ exact embeddedMarks_at e v j omit [Fintype A] [DecidableEq A] in lemma embeddedMarks_count (e : Fin q ↪ Fin N) (v : Fin q → A) : (univ.filter (fun i => (embeddedMarks e v i).isSome)).card=q := by classical have he : univ.filter (fun i => (embeddedMarks e v i).isSome)=univ.map e := by ext i simp only [mem_filter,mem_univ,true_and,mem_map] constructor · intro hi cases hm : embeddedMarks e v i with | none => simp [hm] at hi | some a => obtain ⟨j,hj,_⟩ := (embeddedMarks_some e v i a).mp hm exact ⟨j,hj⟩ · rintro ⟨j,rfl⟩ simp only [embeddedMarks_at,Option.isSome_some] rw [he,card_map,card_univ,Fintype.card_fin] lemma embeddedMarks_test (e : Fin q ↪ Fin N) (v : Fin q → A) (w : Fin N → A) : test (embeddedMarks e v) w=if w ∘ e=v then 1 else 0 := by classical rw [test_eq_indicator] congr 1 apply propext constructor · intro h funext j exact h (e j) (v j) (embeddedMarks_at e v j) · intro h i a hm obtain ⟨j,rfl,hj⟩ := (embeddedMarks_some e v i a).mp hm exact (congrFun h j).trans hj end SmoothObstruction.SequentialLaw namespace SmoothObstruction.WordFlatten open Finset FiniteLaw WordLaw SequentialLaw variable {V : Type*} [AddCommGroup V] [Module (ZMod 2) V] [FiniteDimensional (ZMod 2) V] [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] (B : LinearMap.BilinForm (ZMod 2) V) {K b H q : ℕ} omit [FiniteDimensional (ZMod 2) V] in /-- The pushed law of any distinct coordinate list has the exact W3 atom bound; the law is the recursively used single conditioned sampler. -/ theorem flat_window_atom (hd : K+1 ≤ Module.finrank (ZMod 2) V) (hK : 1 ≤ K) (E : Finset (Fin b → Fin H → {v : V // v ≠ 0})) (hE : 1/2 ≤ prob (rawLaw B hd H b) E) (e : Fin q ↪ Fin (b*H)) (v : Fin q → {v : V // v ≠ 0}) : (push (flatLaw B hd E hE) (fun w => w ∘ e)).mass v ≤ 2*((2:ℝ)^(2*K)/Fintype.card {v : V // v ≠ 0})^q := by have hh := flat_sublist B hd hK E hE (embeddedMarks e v) rw [embeddedMarks_count] at hh simp only [FiniteLaw.expect,embeddedMarks_test] at hh simpa only [push,FiniteLaw.expect,mul_ite,mul_one,mul_zero] using hh end SmoothObstruction.WordFlatten namespace SmoothObstruction.FiniteLaw open Finset variable {A B C : Type*} [Fintype A] [Fintype B] [Fintype C] lemma mass_ext (P Q : Law A) (h : P.mass=Q.mass) : P=Q := by cases P; cases Q; cases h; rfl lemma push_comp [DecidableEq B] [DecidableEq C] (P : Law A) (f : A → B) (g : B → C) : push (push P f) g=push P (g ∘ f) := by apply mass_ext funext c simp only [push] calc _ = ∑ b,∑ a,if g b=c then (if f a=b then P.mass a else 0) else 0 := by apply sum_congr rfl intro b _ split_ifs <;> simp _ = _ := by rw [sum_comm] apply sum_congr rfl intro a _ have he (b : B) : (if g b=c then (if f a=b then P.mass a else 0) else 0) = if f a=b then (if g b=c then P.mass a else 0) else 0 := by split_ifs <;> rfl simp only [he,Finset.sum_ite_eq,mem_univ,ite_true,Function.comp_apply] lemma push_uniform_mass [Nonempty A] [DecidableEq B] (f : A → B) (b : B) : (push uniform f).mass b=(∑ a,if f a=b then (1:ℝ) else 0)/Fintype.card A := by simp only [push,uniform,div_eq_mul_inv,sum_mul,ite_mul,one_mul,zero_mul] lemma uniform_reindex [Nonempty A] [Nonempty B] [DecidableEq C] (e : A ≃ B) (f : B → C) : push (uniform (α:=A)) (f ∘ e)=push (uniform (α:=B)) f := by apply mass_ext funext c rw [push_uniform_mass,push_uniform_mass,Fintype.card_congr e] congr 1 exact e.sum_comp (fun b => if f b=c then (1:ℝ) else 0) lemma push_observable {N : ℕ} [DecidableEq C] (P : Law (Fin N → A)) (f : (Fin N → A) → C) (c : C) : (push P f).mass c=WordFamily.observableLaw P f c := by simp only [push,WordFamily.observableLaw,expect,mul_ite,mul_one,mul_zero] lemma TV_empirical {M N : ℕ} [NeZero M] [DecidableEq C] (P : Law (Fin N → A)) (f : (Fin N → A) → C) (w : Fin M → Fin N → A) : TV (push uniform (f ∘ w)) (push P f)=WordFamily.empiricalTV P f w := by simp only [TV,push_uniform_mass,Fintype.card_fin,push_observable, WordFamily.empiricalTV,Function.comp_apply] lemma TV_grouped {q H : ℕ} [NeZero q] [NeZero H] [Nonempty A] [DecidableEq C] (f : A → C) (w : Fin q → Fin H → A) : TV (push uniform (f ∘ WordFlatten.flattenEquiv w)) (push uniform f) = (1/2:ℝ)*∑ c, |(∑ b,(∑ r,if f (w b r)=c then (1:ℝ) else 0)/(H:ℝ))/(q:ℝ)- (∑ a,if f a=c then (1:ℝ) else 0)/Fintype.card A| := by unfold TV congr 1 apply sum_congr rfl intro c _ rw [push_uniform_mass,push_uniform_mass,Fintype.card_fin] congr 2 have he : (∑ j : Fin (q*H),if (f ∘ WordFlatten.flattenEquiv w) j=c then (1:ℝ) else 0) = ∑ b,∑ r,if f (w b r)=c then (1:ℝ) else 0 := by rw [← finProdFinEquiv.sum_comp] simpa only [Function.comp_apply,WordFlatten.flattenEquiv,Equiv.coe_fn_mk, Equiv.symm_apply_apply] using Fintype.sum_prod_type (fun br : Fin q × Fin H => if f (w br.1 br.2)=c then (1:ℝ) else 0) rw [he,←sum_div,Nat.cast_mul] simp only [div_div] rw [mul_comm] lemma atom_entropy_formula {q K : ℕ} [Nonempty A] (P : Law (Fin q → A)) (hP : ∀ v,P.mass v ≤ 2*((2:ℝ)^(2*K)/Fintype.card A)^q) : (q:ℝ)*(Real.log (Fintype.card A)-(2*K:ℕ)*Real.log 2)-Real.log 2 ≤ entropy P := by have hc : (0:ℝ) window (S i) t ((stage i).word a)) noncomputable def parentWindow (i : ℕ) (a : A (i+2)) (t : Offsets (S i)) : Law (Fin (D (S i)) → A i) := push uniform (fun j : Fin (groupLength (i+1)) => window (S i) t ((stage i).word ((stage (i+1)).word a j))) /-- W3 for the actual uniform selected family, in the finite-law API. -/ lemma uniformWindow_close (i : ℕ) (t : Offsets (S i)) : TV (uniformWindow i t) (conditionedWindow i t) ≤ 1/10000 := by have h := (stage i).windowTV t rw [←TV_empirical] at h change TV (push uniform ((window (S i) t) ∘ (stage i).w)) (conditionedWindow i t) ≤ _ at h have he : uniformWindow i t=push uniform ((window (S i) t) ∘ (stage i).w) := by exact uniform_reindex (Fintype.equivFin (A (i+1))) ((window (S i) t) ∘ (stage i).w) rwa [he] /-- W4 for each actual parent: uniformity is only over its slots, never an assumption on the parent-word distribution. -/ lemma parentWindow_close (i : ℕ) (a : A (i+2)) (t : Offsets (S i)) : TV (parentWindow i a t) (uniformWindow i t) ≤ 1/10000 := by let : NeZero (q (S (i+1))) := ⟨(q_pos _).ne'⟩ let : NeZero (H (S (i+1))) := ⟨(H_pos _).ne'⟩ have hh := TV_grouped (fun b => window (S i) t ((stage i).word b)) (WordFlatten.flattenEquiv.symm ((stage (i+1)).word a)) simp only [Equiv.apply_symm_apply] at hh change TV (parentWindow i a t) (uniformWindow i t)= WordLaw.tvFromUniformObservable (fun b => window (S i) t ((stage i).word b)) (WordFlatten.flattenEquiv.symm ((stage (i+1)).word a)) at hh rw [hh] exact stage_approximates i a t /-- The two and only two approximation costs used in the manuscript. -/ lemma parent_conditioned_close (i : ℕ) (a : A (i+2)) (t : Offsets (S i)) : TV (conditionedWindow i t) (parentWindow i a t) ≤ 2/10000 := by rw [TV_symm] have ht := TV_triangle (parentWindow i a t) (uniformWindow i t) (conditionedWindow i t) have h1 := parentWindow_close i a t have h2 := uniformWindow_close i t linarith def windowEmbedding (i : ℕ) (t : Offsets (S i)) {r : ℕ} (hr : r ≤ D (S i)) : Fin r ↪ Fin (groupLength i) where toFun k := ⟨t.val.val+k.val,by change t.val.val+k.val < q (S i)*H (S i); have h := t.property; have hk := k.isLt; omega⟩ inj' := by intro j k h; apply Fin.ext; have he := congrArg Fin.val h; dsimp at he; omega def takePrefix {level r d : ℕ} (hr : r ≤ d) (w : Fin d → A level) : Fin r → A level := fun k => w ⟨k.val,lt_of_lt_of_le k.isLt hr⟩ lemma conditioned_prefix_atom (i : ℕ) (t : Offsets (S i)) {r : ℕ} (hr : r ≤ D (S i)) (v : Fin r → A i) : (push (conditionedWindow i t) (takePrefix hr)).mass v ≤ 2*((2:ℝ)^(2*K (S i))/Fintype.card (A i))^r := by rw [conditionedWindow,push_comp] exact WordFlatten.flat_window_atom (form (S i)) (goodDim i) (by change 1 ≤ K (sequence 40000 i); have := (step_conditions initial_threshold i).1; omega) (stage i).E (stage i).massE (windowEmbedding i t hr) v /-- A real entropy lower bound for EVERY selected parent and admissible internal offset, with fully constructed comparison law and all atom bounds. -/ theorem parent_prefix_entropy (i : ℕ) (a : A (i+2)) (t : Offsets (S i)) {r : ℕ} (hr : r ≤ D (S i)) : (r:ℝ)*((1-2/10000)*Real.log (Fintype.card (A i))-(2*K (S i):ℕ)*Real.log 2)-2*Real.log 2 ≤ entropy (push (parentWindow i a t) (takePrefix hr)) := by exact window_entropy_close (push (conditionedWindow i t) (takePrefix hr)) _ (conditioned_prefix_atom i t hr) ((TV_push _ _ (takePrefix hr)).trans (parent_conditioned_close i a t)) end SmoothObstruction.WordHierarchy namespace SmoothObstruction.FiniteLaw open MeasureTheory Set Finset variable {X α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace X] [Fintype α] [Fintype β] [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSingletonClass β] omit [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] in lemma observed_ext {P Q : Law α} (h : P.mass=Q.mass) : P=Q := by cases P; cases Q; cases h; rfl noncomputable def observed (μ : Measure X) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (f : X → α) (hf : Measurable f) : Law α where mass a := μ.real {x | f x=a} nonneg _ := measureReal_nonneg total := by have h := Alignment.sum_fibers μ univ hf simpa only [Set.mem_univ,true_and,probReal_univ] using h lemma observed_push [DecidableEq β] (μ : Measure X) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (f : X → α) (hf : Measurable f) (g : α → β) : push (observed μ f hf) g = observed μ (g ∘ f) ((measurable_of_countable g).comp hf) := by classical apply observed_ext funext b dsimp only [push,FiniteEntropy.pushMass,observed,Function.comp_apply] rw [←Alignment.sum_fibers μ {x | g (f x)=b} hf] apply sum_congr rfl intro a _ by_cases ha : g a=b · rw [ite_eq_left ha] congr 1 ext x simp only [Set.mem_ofPred_eq] exact ⟨fun hx => ⟨by rw [hx,ha],hx⟩,And.right⟩ · rw [ite_eq_right ha] have he : {x | x∈{x | g (f x)=b} ∧ f x=a}=∅ := by ext x simp only [Set.mem_ofPred_eq,Set.mem_empty_iff_false,iff_false] rintro ⟨hb,hf⟩ exact ha (hf ▸ hb) rw [he,measureReal_empty] noncomputable def conditionalObserved (μ : Measure X) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (f : X → α) (hf : Measurable f) (k : X → β) (_hk : Measurable k) [Nonempty α] (b : β) : Law α := by let p := μ.real {x | k x=b} by_cases hp : p=0 · exact uniform · refine ⟨(fun a => μ.real {x | k x=b ∧ f x=a}/p),fun _ => div_nonneg measureReal_nonneg measureReal_nonneg,?_⟩ rw [←sum_div] have hs := Alignment.sum_fibers μ {x | k x=b} hf simp only [Set.mem_ofPred_eq] at hs rw [hs] exact div_self hp lemma conditionalObserved_mass (μ : Measure X) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (f : X → α) (hf : Measurable f) (k : X → β) (hk : Measurable k) [Nonempty α] (b : β) (a : α) : (observed μ k hk).mass b*(conditionalObserved μ f hf k hk b).mass a = μ.real {x | k x=b ∧ f x=a} := by change μ.real {x | k x=b}*_= _ unfold conditionalObserved dsimp only split_ifs with hp · rw [hp,zero_mul] apply (le_antisymm ?_ measureReal_nonneg).symm calc _ ≤ μ.real {x | k x=b} := measureReal_mono (by intro x hx; exact hx.1) _ = 0 := hp · exact mul_div_cancel₀ _ hp /-- Disintegration over a finite actual observation. Zero conditional masses are represented by a harmless uniform law and contribute exactly zero. -/ theorem observed_mixture (μ : Measure X) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (f : X → α) (hf : Measurable f) (k : X → β) (hk : Measurable k) [Nonempty α] : observed μ f hf=mixture (observed μ k hk) (conditionalObserved μ f hf k hk) := by apply observed_ext funext a change μ.real {x | f x=a}=∑ b,_ simp only [conditionalObserved_mass] have h := Alignment.sum_fibers μ {x | f x=a} hk simpa only [Set.mem_ofPred_eq,and_comm] using h.symm end SmoothObstruction.FiniteLaw namespace SmoothObstruction.WordHierarchy open WordParameters WordStep WordConcatenation MeasureTheory Set Finset FiniteLaw open scoped ENNReal noncomputable instance stageLengthNeZero (i : ℕ) : NeZero (N (S i)) := ⟨(N_pos _).ne'⟩ lemma measurable_slot (i : ℕ) : Measurable (slot i) := by have hh : slot i = (fun a : ZMod (length 40000 (i+1)) => (⟨a.val / length 40000 i,by apply (Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul (length_pos 40000 i)).mpr simpa only [length_step,Nat.mul_comm] using ZMod.val_lt a⟩ : Fin (N (S i)))) ∘ phase (i+1) := rfl rw [hh] exact (measurable_of_countable _).comp (measurable_phase (i+1)) lemma pack_slots (i : ℕ) (x : Extension) : pack (slot (i+1) x,slot i x)=parentSlot i x := by apply Fin.ext rw [pack_val,slot_pair] lemma slots_iff (i : ℕ) (x : Extension) (u : Fin (N (S i))) (h : Fin (N (S (i+1)))) : slot i x=u ∧ slot (i+1) x=h ↔ parentSlot i x=pack (h,u) := by rw [←pack_slots,(Equiv.injective pack).eq_iff,Prod.mk.injEq,and_comm] lemma boundary_phase_zero (μ : Measure Extension) (i : ℕ) : ∀ᵐ x ∂boundary μ i,phase i x=0 := by exact Measure.ae_smul_measure (ae_restrict_mem (measurableSet_eq_fun (measurable_phase i) measurable_const)) _ lemma boundary_slots_mass (μ : Measure Extension) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hT : MeasurePreserving T μ μ) (i : ℕ) (v : A (i+2)) (u : Fin (N (S i))) (h : Fin (N (S (i+1)))) : (boundary μ i).real {x | label (i+2) x=v ∧ slot i x=u ∧ slot (i+1) x=h} = μ.real {x | label (i+2) x=v}/((N (S i):ℝ)*N (S (i+1))) := by have he : {x | label (i+2) x=v ∧ slot i x=u ∧ slot (i+1) x=h} = {x | parentSlot i x=pack (h,u) ∧ label (i+2) x=v} := by ext x simp only [Set.mem_ofPred_eq,←slots_iff,and_comm] rw [he] apply (eq_div_iff (mul_ne_zero (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr (N_pos _).ne') (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr (N_pos _).ne') : (N (S i):ℝ)*N (S (i+1))≠0)).mpr have hh := boundary_parentSlot_mass μ hT i v (pack (h,u)) simpa only [Nat.cast_mul,mul_comm] using hh noncomputable def windowKey (i : ℕ) (x : Extension) : A (i+2) × Fin (N (S i)) := (label (i+2) x,slot i x) lemma measurable_windowKey (i : ℕ) : Measurable (windowKey i) := (measurable_label _).prodMk (measurable_slot _) lemma boundary_key_mass (μ : Measure Extension) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (hT : MeasurePreserving T μ μ) (i : ℕ) (v : A (i+2)) (u : Fin (N (S i))) : (boundary μ i).real {x | windowKey i x=(v,u)} = μ.real {x | label (i+2) x=v}/N (S i) := by let : IsProbabilityMeasure (boundary μ i) := boundary_isProbability μ hT i rw [←Alignment.sum_fibers (boundary μ i) {x | windowKey i x=(v,u)} (measurable_slot (i+1))] have hs (h : Fin (N (S (i+1)))) : (boundary μ i).real {x | x∈{x | windowKey i x=(v,u)} ∧ slot (i+1) x=h} = μ.real {x | label (i+2) x=v}/((N (S i):ℝ)*N (S (i+1))) := by convert boundary_slots_mass μ hT i v u h using 2 ext x simp only [Set.mem_ofPred_eq,windowKey,Prod.mk.injEq,and_assoc] simp only [hs,sum_const,card_univ,Fintype.card_fin,nsmul_eq_mul] field_simp [Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr (N_pos (S (i+1))).ne'] end SmoothObstruction.WordHierarchy namespace SmoothObstruction.WordHierarchy open WordParameters WordStep WordConcatenation MeasureTheory Set Finset FiniteLaw /-- The actual r-child window at an internal offset of a specified parent. -/ noncomputable def sampledWindow (i r : ℕ) (u : Fin (N (S i))) (hr : u.val+r ≤ N (S i)) (v : A (i+2)) (h : Fin (N (S (i+1)))) : Fin r → A i := fun j => children i (children (i+1) v h) ⟨u.val+j.val,by have := j.isLt; omega⟩ noncomputable def sampledLaw (i r : ℕ) (u : Fin (N (S i))) (hr : u.val+r ≤ N (S i)) (v : A (i+2)) : Law (Fin r → A i) := push uniform (sampledWindow i r u hr v) lemma labelList_key (i r : ℕ) (u : Fin (N (S i))) (hr : u.val+r ≤ N (S i)) (v : A (i+2)) (h : Fin (N (S (i+1)))) (x : Extension) (hx : phase i x=0) (hk : windowKey i x=(v,u)) (hh : slot (i+1) x=h) : labelList i r x=sampledWindow i r u hr v h := by have hv : label (i+2) x=v := congrArg Prod.fst hk have hu : slot i x=u := congrArg Prod.snd hk rw [labelList_inside i r x hx (by simpa only [hu] using hr)] simp only [hv,hu,hh] rfl /-- Exact disintegration at an admissible offset. Stationarity gives slot uniformity even when the parent marginal has zero or varying masses. -/ theorem boundary_window_joint (μ : Measure Extension) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (hT : MeasurePreserving T μ μ) (i r : ℕ) (u : Fin (N (S i))) (hr : u.val+r ≤ N (S i)) (v : A (i+2)) (w : Fin r → A i) : (boundary μ i).real {x | windowKey i x=(v,u) ∧ labelList i r x=w} = (boundary μ i).real {x | windowKey i x=(v,u)}*(sampledLaw i r u hr v).mass w := by classical let : IsProbabilityMeasure (boundary μ i) := boundary_isProbability μ hT i rw [←Alignment.sum_fibers (boundary μ i) {x | windowKey i x=(v,u) ∧ labelList i r x=w} (measurable_slot (i+1))] have hs (h : Fin (N (S (i+1)))) : (boundary μ i).real {x | x∈{x | windowKey i x=(v,u) ∧ labelList i r x=w} ∧ slot (i+1) x=h} = if sampledWindow i r u hr v h=w then μ.real {x | label (i+2) x=v}/((N (S i):ℝ)*N (S (i+1))) else 0 := by by_cases hw : sampledWindow i r u hr v h=w · rw [ite_eq_left hw] apply (measureReal_congr ?_).trans (boundary_slots_mass μ hT i v u h) filter_upwards [boundary_phase_zero μ i] with x hx apply propext constructor · rintro ⟨⟨hk,_⟩,hh⟩ exact ⟨congrArg Prod.fst hk,congrArg Prod.snd hk,hh⟩ · rintro ⟨hv,hu,hh⟩ have hk : windowKey i x=(v,u) := Prod.ext hv hu exact ⟨⟨hk,(labelList_key i r u hr v h x hx hk hh).trans hw⟩,hh⟩ · rw [ite_eq_right hw] apply (measureReal_congr (t := (∅ : Set Extension)) ?_).trans measureReal_empty filter_upwards [boundary_phase_zero μ i] with x hx apply propext change ((windowKey i x=(v,u) ∧ labelList i r x=w) ∧ slot (i+1) x=h) ↔ False constructor · rintro ⟨⟨hk,hlist⟩,hh⟩ exact hw ((labelList_key i r u hr v h x hx hk hh).symm.trans hlist) · exact False.elim simp only [hs,boundary_key_mass μ hT i v u] simp only [sampledLaw,push,uniform,Fintype.card_fin] rw [mul_sum] apply sum_congr rfl intro h _ split_ifs <;> simp [div_eq_mul_inv,mul_assoc,mul_left_comm,mul_comm] /-- The conditional law is the actual finite-parent sampled window law on all positive-probability fibres. No hypothesis about parent frequencies. -/ lemma conditional_window_eq (μ : Measure Extension) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (hT : MeasurePreserving T μ μ) (i r : ℕ) (u : Fin (N (S i))) (hr : u.val+r ≤ N (S i)) (v : A (i+2)) (hp : (boundary μ i).real {x | windowKey i x=(v,u)}≠0) : let : IsProbabilityMeasure (boundary μ i) := boundary_isProbability μ hT i conditionalObserved (boundary μ i) (labelList i r) (measurable_labelList i r) (windowKey i) (measurable_windowKey i) (v,u)=sampledLaw i r u hr v := by let : IsProbabilityMeasure (boundary μ i) := boundary_isProbability μ hT i apply mass_ext funext w have hh := conditionalObserved_mass (boundary μ i) (labelList i r) (measurable_labelList i r) (windowKey i) (measurable_windowKey i) (v,u) w rw [boundary_window_joint μ hT i r u hr v w] at hh exact (mul_left_cancel₀ hp) hh end SmoothObstruction.WordHierarchy namespace SmoothObstruction.WordHierarchy open MeasureTheory Set Finset WordParameters WordStep FiniteLaw lemma sampledLaw_prefix (i : ℕ) (a : A (i+2)) (t : Offsets (S i)) {r : ℕ} (hr : r ≤ D (S i)) : sampledLaw i r ((finCongr (q_mul_H (S i))) t.val) (by have _ht := t.property; change t.val.val+r ≤ N (S i); rw [←q_mul_H]; omega) a = push (parentWindow i a t) (takePrefix hr) := by classical rw [parentWindow,push_comp] have he : (fun j : Fin (groupLength (i+1)) => takePrefix hr (window (S i) t ((stage i).word ((stage (i+1)).word a j)))) = sampledWindow i r ((finCongr (q_mul_H (S i))) t.val) (by have _ht := t.property; change t.val.val+r ≤ N (S i); rw [←q_mul_H]; omega) a ∘ (finCongr (q_mul_H (S (i+1)))) := by funext j k simp only [Function.comp_apply,sampledWindow,children,Equiv.symm_apply_apply,takePrefix,window] congr 2 change push uniform _ = push uniform _ dsimp only [Function.comp_def] rw [he] exact (uniform_reindex (finCongr (q_mul_H (S (i+1)))) _).symm noncomputable def windowLower (i r : ℕ) : ℝ := (r:ℝ)*((1-2/10000)*Real.log (Fintype.card (A i))-(2*K (S i):ℕ)*Real.log 2)-2*Real.log 2 lemma sampled_entropy (i : ℕ) (a : A (i+2)) (u : Fin (N (S i))) (hu : u.val+D (S i) ≤ N (S i)) {r : ℕ} (hr : r ≤ D (S i)) : windowLower i r ≤ entropy (sampledLaw i r u (by omega) a) := by let t : Offsets (S i) := ⟨(finCongr (q_mul_H (S i))).symm u,by change u.val+D (S i) ≤ q (S i)*H (S i) rwa [q_mul_H]⟩ have hh := parent_prefix_entropy i a t hr rw [←sampledLaw_prefix] at hh simpa only [t,windowLower,Equiv.apply_symm_apply] using hh /-- The entropy of the genuine stationary aligned orbit window is bounded using the exactly uniform internal-slot law, not a selected parent law. -/ theorem boundary_window_entropy (μ : Measure Extension) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (hT : MeasurePreserving T μ μ) (i r : ℕ) (hr : r ≤ D (S i)) : let : IsProbabilityMeasure (boundary μ i) := boundary_isProbability μ hT i (∑ b : A (i+2) × Fin (N (S i)), if b.2.val+D (S i) ≤ N (S i) then (observed (boundary μ i) (windowKey i) (measurable_windowKey i)).mass b else 0)*windowLower i r ≤ entropy (observed (boundary μ i) (labelList i r) (measurable_labelList i r)) := by classical let : IsProbabilityMeasure (boundary μ i) := boundary_isProbability μ hT i dsimp only rw [observed_mixture (boundary μ i) (labelList i r) (measurable_labelList i r) (windowKey i) (measurable_windowKey i)] apply le_trans _ (entropy_mixture _ _) rw [sum_mul] apply sum_le_sum rintro ⟨v,u⟩ _ by_cases hu : u.val+D (S i) ≤ N (S i) · rw [ite_eq_left hu] by_cases hp : (boundary μ i).real {x | windowKey i x=(v,u)}=0 · change (boundary μ i).real {x | windowKey i x=(v,u)}*_ ≤ _ simp only [hp,zero_mul,observed,le_refl] · rw [conditional_window_eq μ hT i r u (by omega) v hp] exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (sampled_entropy i v u hu hr) measureReal_nonneg · rw [ite_eq_right hu,zero_mul] exact mul_nonneg measureReal_nonneg (entropy_nonneg _) end SmoothObstruction.WordHierarchy namespace SmoothObstruction.WordHierarchy open MeasureTheory Set Finset WordParameters WordStep FiniteLaw lemma D_pos (s : ℕ) : 0 u.val+D s ≤ N s))= (univ.filter (fun u : Fin (N s) => u.val < N s-D s+1)) := by apply Finset.filter_congr intro u hu omega rw [he,Fin.card_filter_val_lt,min_eq_right (by omega)] lemma good_key_mass (μ : Measure Extension) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (hT : MeasurePreserving T μ μ) (i : ℕ) : let : IsProbabilityMeasure (boundary μ i) := boundary_isProbability μ hT i (∑ b : A (i+2) × Fin (N (S i)), if b.2.val+D (S i) ≤ N (S i) then (observed (boundary μ i) (windowKey i) (measurable_windowKey i)).mass b else 0)= (N (S i)-D (S i)+1:ℕ)/(N (S i):ℝ) := by classical let : IsProbabilityMeasure (boundary μ i) := boundary_isProbability μ hT i dsimp only rw [Fintype.sum_prod_type] simp only [observed,boundary_key_mass μ hT] have hs (v : A (i+2)) : (∑ u : Fin (N (S i)),if u.val+D (S i) ≤ N (S i) then μ.real {x | label (i+2) x=v}/N (S i) else 0)= (N (S i)-D (S i)+1:ℕ)*(μ.real {x | label (i+2) x=v}/N (S i)) := by rw [←sum_filter] simp only [sum_const,nsmul_eq_mul,good_offset_count] simp only [hs] rw [←mul_sum,←sum_div] have hm := (observed μ (label (i+2)) (measurable_label (i+2))).total change (∑ v,μ.real {x | label (i+2) x=v})=1 at hm rw [hm,mul_one_div] /-- The manuscript's explicit stationary entropy lower bound, with the exact loss from inadmissible offsets and an arbitrary invariant probability. -/ theorem stationary_window_entropy (μ : Measure Extension) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (hT : MeasurePreserving T μ μ) (i r : ℕ) (hr : r ≤ D (S i)) : let : IsProbabilityMeasure (boundary μ i) := boundary_isProbability μ hT i ((N (S i)-D (S i)+1:ℕ)/(N (S i):ℝ))*windowLower i r ≤ entropy (observed (boundary μ i) (labelList i r) (measurable_labelList i r)) := by have hh := boundary_window_entropy μ hT i r hr let : IsProbabilityMeasure (boundary μ i) := boundary_isProbability μ hT i dsimp only at hh ⊢ rw [good_key_mass μ hT i] at hh exact hh end SmoothObstruction.WordHierarchy namespace SmoothObstruction.WordHierarchy open MeasureTheory Set Finset WordParameters WordAlphabet WordStep FiniteLaw lemma log_card (i : ℕ) : Real.log (Fintype.card (A i))=ell (S i)*Real.log 2 := by change Real.log (Fintype.card (Alphabet (S i)))=_ rw [cardAlphabetReal] dsimp only [ell,alphabetSize,Real.logb] rw [div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt (Real.log_pos (by norm_num : (1:ℝ)<2)))] lemma K_large {i : ℕ} (hi : 1 ≤ i) : 4000 ≤ K (S i) := by have h := K_double_exponential initial_threshold i have hpow : 2 ≤ (2:ℕ)^i := by calc _ = (2:ℕ)^1 := by norm_num _ ≤ _ := Nat.pow_le_pow_right (by decide) hi have hh : (2:ℕ)^16 ≤ 2^(8*2^i) := Nat.pow_le_pow_right (by decide) (by omega) exact (by norm_num : 4000 ≤ (2:ℕ)^16).trans (hh.trans h) lemma bad_offset_small (i : ℕ) : (D (S i):ℝ)/(N (S i):ℝ) ≤ 1/2000 := by have hk := (step_conditions initial_threshold i).1 change 256 ≤ K (S i) at hk have he : K (S i)/8+11 ≤ K (S i) := by omega have hp : 2048*D (S i) ≤ N (S i) := by calc _ = 2^(K (S i)/8+11) := by rw [pow_add]; norm_num [D]; ring _ ≤ _ := Nat.pow_le_pow_right (by decide) he have hr : (2000:ℝ)*(D (S i):ℝ) ≤ N (S i) := by exact_mod_cast (show 2000*D (S i) ≤ N (S i) by omega) have hN : (0:ℝ) graphWindows_of_good i k hk x hx hg rw [hm] at hle have hc' : c=H (S i)-(2*2^k-2) := by dsimp only [c]; omega have hsub : 2*2^k-2 ≤ H (S i) := by omega rw [hc',Nat.cast_sub hsub] at hle have hHp : (H (S i):ℝ)≠0 := by exact_mod_cast (H_pos (S i)).ne' convert hle using 1 field_simp end SmoothObstruction.WordHierarchy end section open Finset namespace SmoothObstruction.FiniteLaw open MeasureTheory Set Finset variable {X α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace X] [Fintype α] [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] /-- Every finite observable's real expectation agrees with integration in its original probability space. No conditional normalization occurs. -/ theorem observed_integral (μ : Measure X) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (f : X → α) (hf : Measurable f) (g : α → ℝ) : (∑ a,(observed μ f hf).mass a*g a)=∫ x,g (f x) ∂μ := by calc _ = ∫ a,g a ∂(μ.map f) := by rw [integral_fintype (Integrable.of_finite (μ:=μ.map f))] apply sum_congr rfl intro a _ simp only [observed,Measure.real,Measure.map_apply hf (measurableSet_singleton a), smul_eq_mul] rfl _ = _ := integral_map hf.aemeasurable (measurable_of_countable g).aestronglyMeasurable /-- A lower bound on a success event is a lower bound in the UNCONDITIONED law. In particular .95 mass at statistic .96 gives expectation .912. -/ theorem integral_lower_of_event (μ : Measure X) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (Z : X → ℝ) (hZi : Integrable Z μ) (hZn : ∀ x,0≤Z x) (G : Set X) (hG : MeasurableSet G) (a b : ℝ) (ha : 0≤a) (hGm : b≤μ.real G) (hZG : ∀ x∈G,a≤Z x) : a*b≤∫ x,Z x ∂μ := by calc a*b ≤ μ.real G*a := by nlinarith _ = ∫ x,G.indicator (fun _ => a) x ∂μ := by rw [integral_indicator_const a hG,smul_eq_mul] _ ≤ _ := integral_mono_ae ((integrable_const a).indicator hG) hZi (Filter.Eventually.of_forall (fun x => by by_cases hx : x∈G · simpa only [indicator_of_mem hx] using hZG x hx · simpa only [indicator_of_notMem hx] using hZn x)) end SmoothObstruction.FiniteLaw end end OAI