import OAI.Dynamics.TriangleBilliards.RegularizedModes namespace OAI universe uAlpha uBeta uE uF uIota uKappa open MeasureTheory Set open scoped ENNReal symmDiff noncomputable section open MeasureTheory Set Filter Function Metric open scoped Topology Convolution ContDiff noncomputable section open MeasureTheory Set open scoped ENNReal noncomputable section open MeasureTheory Set Filter BoundedContinuousFunction open scoped ENNReal Topology ComplexConjugate noncomputable section open MeasureTheory Set Filter open scoped Topology ComplexConjugate noncomputable section open MeasureTheory Filter open scoped ComplexConjugate noncomputable section open MeasureTheory Filter Set open scoped Topology ComplexConjugate noncomputable section open Filter Finset Set open scoped Topology BigOperators noncomputable section open MeasureTheory Filter Set open scoped Topology ContDiff NNReal open MeasureTheory Filter Set open scoped Topology ComplexConjugate noncomputable section open Filter Set open scoped Topology noncomputable section namespace TriangularBilliards.Analytic section Weak variable {E : Type uE} {F : Type uF} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {α : Type uAlpha} {l : Filter α} /-- Scalar-test characterization of weak convergence over the real field. -/ def WeaklyTendsto (u : α → E) (l : Filter α) (v : E) : Prop := ∀ L : E →L[ℝ] ℝ, Tendsto (fun n => L (u n)) l (𝓝 (L v)) lemma weaklyTendsto_of_tendsto {u : α → E} {v : E} (h : Tendsto u l (𝓝 v)) : WeaklyTendsto u l v := fun L => L.continuous.continuousAt.tendsto.comp h lemma WeaklyTendsto.comp {u : α → E} {v : E} (h : WeaklyTendsto u l v) {β : Type uBeta} {m : Filter β} {φ : β → α} (hφ : Tendsto φ m l) : WeaklyTendsto (u ∘ φ) m v := fun L => (h L).comp hφ lemma WeaklyTendsto.prod {u : α → E} {v : α → F} {a : E} {b : F} (hu : WeaklyTendsto u l a) (hv : WeaklyTendsto v l b) : WeaklyTendsto (fun n => (u n, v n)) l (a, b) := by intro L have h := (hu (L.comp (ContinuousLinearMap.inl ℝ E F))).add (hv (L.comp (ContinuousLinearMap.inr ℝ E F))) simpa only [ContinuousLinearMap.comp_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.inl_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.inr_apply, ← map_add, Prod.add_def, add_zero, zero_add] using h lemma WeaklyTendsto.sub_const {u : α → E} {v : E} (h : WeaklyTendsto u l v) (w : E) : WeaklyTendsto (fun n => u n - w) l (v - w) := by intro L simpa only [map_sub] using (h L).sub_const (L w) /-- Norm-closed convex sets remain closed under weak limits. In particular this applies to a uniform L∞ bound inside L² and to a closed derivative graph. -/ lemma WeaklyTendsto.mem_of_closed_convex [l.NeBot] {u : α → E} {v : E} (h : WeaklyTendsto u l v) {C : Set E} (hc : IsClosed C) (hcv : Convex ℝ C) (hu : ∀ᶠ n in l, u n ∈ C) : v ∈ C := by by_contra hn obtain ⟨L, t, hC, hv⟩ := geometric_hahn_banach_closed_point hcv hc hn have hle : L v ≤ t := le_of_tendsto (h L) (hu.mono fun n hn => (hC _ hn).le) exact (not_le_of_gt hv) hle lemma WeaklyTendsto.norm_le [l.NeBot] {u : α → E} {v : E} (h : WeaklyTendsto u l v) {r : ℝ} (hu : ∀ᶠ n in l, ‖u n‖ ≤ r) : ‖v‖ ≤ r := by have hv := h.mem_of_closed_convex Metric.isClosed_closedBall (convex_closedBall (0 : E) r) (hu.mono fun n hn => (mem_closedBall_zero_iff).mpr hn) exact mem_closedBall_zero_iff.mp hv lemma WeaklyTendsto.norm_le_of_bounds [l.NeBot] {u : α → E} {v : E} (h : WeaklyTendsto u l v) {r : α → ℝ} {R : ℝ} (hr : Tendsto r l (𝓝 R)) (hu : ∀ᶠ n in l, ‖u n‖ ≤ r n) : ‖v‖ ≤ R := by apply le_of_forall_pos_le_add intro ε hε apply h.norm_le filter_upwards [hu, hr.eventually (gt_mem_nhds (show R < R + ε by linarith))] with n hn hrn exact hn.trans hrn.le end Weak section Hilbert variable {E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E] [TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace E] /-- Weak sequential compactness of a bounded set in a separable real Hilbert space, obtained from Banach–Alaoglu and Riesz. -/ lemma exists_weak_subsequence (u : ℕ → E) {R : ℝ} (hu : ∀ n, ‖u n‖ ≤ R) : ∃ v : E, ‖v‖ ≤ R ∧ ∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ WeaklyTendsto (u ∘ φ) atTop v := by let J := InnerProductSpace.toDual ℝ E let w : ℕ → WeakDual ℝ E := fun n => StrongDual.toWeakDual (J (u n)) have hw : ∀ n, w n ∈ WeakDual.toStrongDual ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall (0 : StrongDual ℝ E) R := by intro n change dist (J (u n)) 0 ≤ R simpa only [dist_zero_right, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map] using hu n obtain ⟨a, ha, φ, hφ, hlim⟩ := (WeakDual.isSeqCompact_closedBall ℝ E 0 R) hw let v : E := J.symm (WeakDual.toStrongDual a) have hv : ‖v‖ ≤ R := by simpa only [Set.mem_preimage, Metric.mem_closedBall, dist_zero_right, v, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map] using ha refine ⟨v, hv, φ, hφ, ?_⟩ intro L let x : E := J.symm L have heq (y : E) : (J y) x = L y := by change inner ℝ y (J.symm L) = L y rw [real_inner_comm] exact InnerProductSpace.toDual_symm_apply have heqa : a x = L v := by change (WeakDual.toStrongDual a) x = L v have hj : J v = WeakDual.toStrongDual a := J.apply_symm_apply _ rw [← hj, heq] have h := (WeakDual.eval_continuous x).continuousAt.tendsto.comp hlim change Tendsto (fun n => (J (u (φ n))) x) atTop (𝓝 (a x)) at h simpa only [heq, heqa, Function.comp_apply] using h end Hilbert section DerivativeGraph variable {E : Type uE} {F : Type uF} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] /-- A distributional graph described by test identities. Instantiating it with weak differentiation requires constructing its actual test functionals. -/ def TestGraph {ι : Type uIota} (A : ι → E →L[ℝ] ℝ) (B : ι → F →L[ℝ] ℝ) : Set (E × F) := {p | ∀ i, A i p.1 = B i p.2} lemma testGraph_closed {ι : Type uIota} (A : ι → E →L[ℝ] ℝ) (B : ι → F →L[ℝ] ℝ) : IsClosed (TestGraph A B) := by have h : TestGraph A B = ⋂ i, {p : E × F | A i p.1 = B i p.2} := by ext p simp only [TestGraph, mem_ofPred_eq, mem_iInter] rw [h] exact isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_eq ((A i).continuous.comp continuous_fst) ((B i).continuous.comp continuous_snd) lemma testGraph_convex {ι : Type uIota} (A : ι → E →L[ℝ] ℝ) (B : ι → F →L[ℝ] ℝ) : Convex ℝ (TestGraph A B) := by intro p hp q hq a b _ _ _ i simp only [Prod.fst_add, Prod.snd_add, Prod.smul_fst, Prod.smul_snd, map_add, map_smul, hp i, hq i] /-- Identifying the weak derivative limit uses only test identities, not an unjustified claim that the entire horizontal derivative lies in L². -/ lemma testGraph_weak_limit {ι : Type uIota} {α : Type uAlpha} (A : ι → E →L[ℝ] ℝ) (B : ι → F →L[ℝ] ℝ) {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] {u : α → E} {d : α → F} {v : E} {e : F} (hu : WeaklyTendsto u l v) (hd : WeaklyTendsto d l e) (hgraph : ∀ᶠ n in l, (u n, d n) ∈ TestGraph A B) : (v, e) ∈ TestGraph A B := (hu.prod hd).mem_of_closed_convex (testGraph_closed A B) (testGraph_convex A B) hgraph end DerivativeGraph section TestGraphLimits variable {E : Type uE} {F : Type uF} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F] [TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace F] omit [CompleteSpace F] [TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace F] in lemma testGraph_unique {ι : Type uIota} (A : ι → E →L[ℝ] ℝ) (B : ι → F →L[ℝ] ℝ) (hsep : ∀ v : F, (∀ i, B i v = 0) → v = 0) {u : E} {d e : F} (hd : (u, d) ∈ TestGraph A B) (he : (u, e) ∈ TestGraph A B) : d = e := by apply sub_eq_zero.mp apply hsep intro i rw [map_sub, ← hd i, ← he i, sub_self] /-- The second-limit step: strong convergence of the functions and a uniform bound for only the relevant derivatives suffice to pass a fixed pairing to the limit. There is no bound for the sum of all mode derivatives. -/ lemma testGraph_pairing_of_strong_limit {ι : Type uIota} (A : ι → E →L[ℝ] ℝ) (B : ι → F →L[ℝ] ℝ) (hsep : ∀ v : F, (∀ i, B i v = 0) → v = 0) (u : ℕ → E) (d : ℕ → F) {f : E} {e : F} {R : ℝ} (hgraph : ∀ n, (u n, d n) ∈ TestGraph A B) (hf : (f, e) ∈ TestGraph A B) (hu : Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 f)) (hd : ∀ n, ‖d n‖ ≤ R) (L : F →L[ℝ] ℝ) (hL : Tendsto (fun n => L (d n)) atTop (𝓝 0)) : L e = 0 := by obtain ⟨e', _, φ, hφ, he'⟩ := exists_weak_subsequence d hd have hfu := (weaklyTendsto_of_tendsto hu).comp hφ.tendsto_atTop have hfe' : (f, e') ∈ TestGraph A B := testGraph_weak_limit A B hfu he' (Eventually.of_forall fun n => hgraph (φ n)) have heq := testGraph_unique A B hsep hfe' hf have hzero : L e' = 0 := tendsto_nhds_unique (he' L) (hL.comp hφ.tendsto_atTop) simpa only [heq] using hzero end TestGraphLimits section FirstLimit variable {E : Type uE} {F : Type uF} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace E] [TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace E] [CompleteSpace F] [TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace F] /-- The fixed-clearance-budget weak limit. The derivative bound `M` is allowed to depend on that fixed budget. An application must supply all smoothing, support, transport and distributional-graph properties; this lemma supplies the two subsequence extractions and all limit passages. -/ lemma testGraph_first_limit {ι : Type uIota} {κ : Type uKappa} (A : ι → E →L[ℝ] ℝ) (B : ι → F →L[ℝ] ℝ) (X : κ → E →L[ℝ] ℝ) (C : Set E) (hCclosed : IsClosed C) (hCconvex : Convex ℝ C) (u : ℕ → E) (d : ℕ → F) {f : E} {H M δ : ℝ} (δn : ℕ → ℝ) (hu : ∀ n, ‖u n‖ ≤ H) (hd : ∀ n, ‖d n‖ ≤ M) (hC : ∀ n, u n ∈ C) (hgraph : ∀ n, (u n, d n) ∈ TestGraph A B) (hX : ∀ k, Tendsto (fun n => X k (u n)) atTop (𝓝 0)) (hδn : Tendsto δn atTop (𝓝 δ)) (hclose : ∀ n, ‖u n - f‖ ≤ δn n) (L : F →L[ℝ] ℝ) (hL : Tendsto (fun n => L (d n)) atTop (𝓝 0)) : ∃ g : E, ∃ e : F, g ∈ C ∧ (∀ k, X k g = 0) ∧ ‖g - f‖ ≤ δ ∧ (g, e) ∈ TestGraph A B ∧ L e = 0 := by obtain ⟨g, _, φ, hφ, hg⟩ := exists_weak_subsequence u hu obtain ⟨e, _, ψ, hψ, he⟩ := exists_weak_subsequence (d ∘ φ) (fun n => hd (φ n)) have hw : WeaklyTendsto (u ∘ φ ∘ ψ) atTop g := hg.comp hψ.tendsto_atTop have hφψ : Tendsto (φ ∘ ψ) atTop atTop := hφ.tendsto_atTop.comp hψ.tendsto_atTop refine ⟨g, e, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ · exact hw.mem_of_closed_convex hCclosed hCconvex (Eventually.of_forall fun n => hC (φ (ψ n))) · intro k exact tendsto_nhds_unique (hw (X k)) ((hX k).comp hφψ) · exact (hw.sub_const f).norm_le_of_bounds (hδn.comp hφψ) (Eventually.of_forall fun n => hclose (φ (ψ n))) · exact testGraph_weak_limit A B hw he (Eventually.of_forall fun n => hgraph (φ (ψ n))) · exact tendsto_nhds_unique (he L) (hL.comp hφψ) end FirstLimit end TriangularBilliards.Analytic namespace TriangularBilliards.Analytic lemma exists_weak_subsequence_unrestricted {E : Type uE} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E] (u : ℕ → E) {R : ℝ} (hu : ∀ n, ‖u n‖ ≤ R) : ∃ v : E, ‖v‖ ≤ R ∧ ∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ WeaklyTendsto (u ∘ φ) atTop v := by let S := (Submodule.span ℝ (Set.range u)).topologicalClosure have hS : TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable (S : Set E) := ((Set.countable_range u).isSeparable.span (R := ℝ)).closure let : TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace S := hS.separableSpace let w (n : ℕ) : S := ⟨u n, Submodule.le_topologicalClosure _ (Submodule.subset_span (Set.mem_range_self n))⟩ obtain ⟨v,hv,φ,hφ,hw⟩ := exists_weak_subsequence w hu refine ⟨v.val,hv,φ,hφ,?_⟩ intro L exact hw (L.comp S.subtypeL) end TriangularBilliards.Analytic end end end end end end end end end end end OAI