import Mathlib import OAI.SetTheory.PartitionConsistency.Forcing.ProductNames import OAI.SetTheory.PartitionConsistency.Forcing.SupportFilter namespace OAI /-! ## OutsideLabel -/ namespace PartitionConsistency.SupportFilter universe u variable {I : Type u} {J : Set I} {π : Equiv.Perm I} theorem perm_mem_iff (hπ : π ∈ Fix J) (j : I) : π j ∈ J ↔ j ∈ J := by have hf := (mem_Fix J π).mp hπ constructor · intro hj have he : π j = j := π.injective (hf (π j) hj) rwa [he] at hj · intro hj rwa [hf j hj] end PartitionConsistency.SupportFilter namespace PartitionConsistency.ProductForcing universe u open SetForcingNames SetForcingNames.SymmetricSystem noncomputable section variable {M I κ : Type u} [LeftCancelMonoid M] [DiagramOrder.IsConical M] variable {μ : Cardinal.{u}} (hμ : Cardinal.aleph0 ≤ μ) /-- The set of labels outside a specified small set. Every entry remains a literal Cohen label, and its support is the specified small set. -/ def labelOutside (c : κ → ZFSet.{u}) (J : Set I) (hJ : Cardinal.mk J ≤ μ) : (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).Name := (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).collect (label (M := M) hμ c) (fun j p => j ∉ J ∧ p = ⊤) (SupportFilter.Fix J) ⟨J,hJ,le_rfl⟩ (by intro π hπ j p hp refine ⟨π j,(smul_label (M := M) hμ c π j).symm,?_,?_⟩ · exact fun h => hp.1 ((SupportFilter.perm_mem_iff hπ j).mp h) · simpa only [hp.2] using (move_top (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ π)) @[simp] theorem labelOutside_raw (c : κ → ZFSet.{u}) (J : Set I) (hJ : Cardinal.mk J ≤ μ) : (labelOutside (M := M) hμ c J hJ).raw = (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).collectRaw (label (M := M) hμ c) (fun j p => j ∉ J ∧ p = ⊤) := rfl theorem smul_labelOutside (c : κ → ZFSet.{u}) (J : Set I) (hJ : Cardinal.mk J ≤ μ) (π : Equiv.Perm I) (hπ : π ∈ SupportFilter.Fix J) : π • labelOutside (M := M) hμ c J hJ = labelOutside (M := M) hμ c J hJ := by apply Name.ext rw [Name.smul_val,labelOutside_raw] apply (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).collectRaw_move _ _ _ _ π π · exact smul_label (M := M) hμ c π · intro j p apply and_congr (not_congr (SupportFilter.perm_mem_iff hπ j).symm) constructor · rintro rfl; exact move_top hμ π · intro hp apply ((system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).move π).injective rw [hp,move_top] theorem label_mem_labelOutside (c : κ → ZFSet.{u}) (J : Set I) (hJ : Cardinal.mk J ≤ μ) {j : I} (hj : j ∉ J) (p : Poset M I κ) : (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).atomic.MemF p (label (M := M) hμ c j) (labelOutside (M := M) hμ c J hJ) := by apply (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).mem_of_edge (c := ⊤) ?_ le_top rw [labelOutside_raw] exact ((system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).edge_collectRaw _ _ _ _).mpr ⟨j,⊤,⟨hj,rfl⟩,rfl,rfl⟩ theorem mem_labelOutside (c : κ → ZFSet.{u}) (J : Set I) (hJ : Cardinal.mk J ≤ μ) (ν : (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).Name) (p : Poset M I κ) : (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).atomic.MemF p ν (labelOutside (M := M) hμ c J hJ) ↔ ∀ q, q ≤ p → ∃ r, r ≤ q ∧ ∃ j : I, j ∉ J ∧ (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).atomic.EqF r ν (label (M := M) hμ c j) := by constructor · intro h q hqp obtain ⟨r,hrq,τ,d,he,_,heq⟩ := (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).mem_iff.mp h q hqp rw [labelOutside_raw] at he obtain ⟨j,_,hj,hτ,_⟩ := ((system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).edge_collectRaw _ _ _ _).mp he have hh : label (M := M) hμ c j = τ := Name.ext hτ exact ⟨r,hrq,j,hj.1,hh ▸ heq⟩ · intro h apply (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).mem_iff.mpr intro q hqp obtain ⟨r,hrq,j,hj,heq⟩ := h q hqp refine ⟨r,hrq,label (M := M) hμ c j,⊤,?_,le_top,heq⟩ rw [labelOutside_raw] exact ((system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).edge_collectRaw _ _ _ _).mpr ⟨j,⊤,⟨hj,rfl⟩,rfl,rfl⟩ theorem labelOutside_subset (c : κ → ZFSet.{u}) (J : Set I) (hJ : Cardinal.mk J ≤ μ) (p : Poset M I κ) : (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).SubsetF p (labelOutside (M := M) hμ c J hJ) (labelSet (M := M) (I := I) hμ c) := by intro ν q hqp hν apply (mem_labelSet hμ c ν q).mpr intro r hrq obtain ⟨s,hsr,j,_,heq⟩ := (mem_labelOutside hμ c J hJ ν q).mp hν r hrq exact ⟨s,hsr,j,heq⟩ /-- The internal family P(A) minus the empty set, formed by the actual Power Set and Separation constructions. Quantified subsets have no rank bound. -/ def choiceFailureFamily (c : κ → ZFSet.{u}) : (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).Name := (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).separate ((system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).power (labelSet (M := M) (I := I) hμ c)) Fin.elim0 (SetLanguage.nonempty 0) theorem mem_choiceFailureFamily (c : κ → ZFSet.{u}) (ν : (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).Name) (p : Poset M I κ) : (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).atomic.MemF p ν (choiceFailureFamily (M := M) (I := I) hμ c) ↔ (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).SubsetF p ν (labelSet (M := M) (I := I) hμ c) ∧ ∀ q, q ≤ p → ∃ r, r ≤ q ∧ ∃ τ, (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).atomic.MemF r τ ν := by rw [choiceFailureFamily,(system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).mem_separate, (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).mem_power, (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).forces_nonempty] rfl theorem labelOutside_mem_family (c : κ → ZFSet.{u}) (J : Set I) (hJ : Cardinal.mk J ≤ μ) (hj : ∃ j : I, j ∉ J) (p : Poset M I κ) : (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).atomic.MemF p (labelOutside (M := M) hμ c J hJ) (choiceFailureFamily (M := M) (I := I) hμ c) := by apply (mem_choiceFailureFamily hμ c _ p).mpr refine ⟨labelOutside_subset hμ c J hJ p,?_⟩ obtain ⟨j,hj⟩ := hj intro q hqp exact ⟨q,le_rfl,label (M := M) hμ c j,label_mem_labelOutside hμ c J hJ hj q⟩ end end PartitionConsistency.ProductForcing /-! ## Failure -/ namespace PartitionConsistency.ProductForcing universe u open SetForcingNames SetForcingNames.SymmetricSystem DiagramForcing noncomputable section variable {M I κ : Type u} [LeftCancelMonoid M] [DiagramOrder.IsConical M] variable {μ : Cardinal.{u}} (hμ : Cardinal.aleph0 ≤ μ) /-- The adjoined largest condition never prevents passing to a genuine Cohen/diagram condition. -/ theorem exists_condition_below [Nonempty (Diagram M I)] (p : Poset M I κ) : ∃ q : Condition M I κ, (q : Poset M I κ) ≤ p := by induction p using WithTop.recTopCoe with | top => exact ⟨(⊤,Classical.choice inferInstance),le_top⟩ | coe p => exact ⟨p,le_rfl⟩ omit [LeftCancelMonoid M] [DiagramOrder.IsConical M] in theorem Diagram.exists_outside (r : Diagram M I) (hsize : Cardinal.mk M < Cardinal.mk I) : ∃ j : I, j ∉ r.range := by apply (Set.ne_univ_iff_exists_notMem _).mp intro h have hc : Cardinal.mk r.range = Cardinal.mk I := by rw [h,Cardinal.mk_univ] have hr : Cardinal.mk r.range = Cardinal.mk M := Diagram.cardinal_range r exact (ne_of_lt hsize) (hr.symm.trans hc) /-- No HS graph can choose from all nonempty subsets of the label set. The proof moves an actual selected label, preserving both the graph's support and its particular argument, and then amalgamates compatible conditions. -/ theorem not_choiceOn [Infinite M] [Infinite I] [Uncountable κ] (hcard : Cardinal.mk M = μ) (hsize : Cardinal.mk M < Cardinal.mk I) (hmerger : HasFiniteMergers M) (e : M) (he : Cardinal.mk ((Set.range (fun x : M => e * x))ᶜ : Set M) = Cardinal.mk M) (c : κ → ZFSet.{u}) (hc : Function.Injective c) (f : (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).Name) (p : Poset M I κ) : ¬ (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).Forces ![f,choiceFailureFamily (M := M) (I := I) hμ c] p (SetLanguage.choiceOn 0 1) := by let S := system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ obtain ⟨em⟩ := (Cardinal.le_def M I).mp hsize.le let : Nonempty (Diagram M I) := ⟨⟨em⟩⟩ intro hchoice obtain ⟨hfun,hs⟩ := (S.forces_choiceOn _ _ _ _).mp hchoice obtain ⟨J,hJ,hfix⟩ := name_support hμ f obtain ⟨p₀,hp₀⟩ := exists_condition_below p obtain ⟨r,hr,hcover⟩ := Diagram.extend_through hsize e he p₀.2 (hcard ▸ hJ) have hrp : r ≤ p₀.2 := ⟨e,hr⟩ let q : Condition M I κ := (p₀.1,r) have hqp₀ : (q : Poset M I κ) ≤ p₀ := WithTop.coe_le_coe.mpr ⟨le_rfl,hrp⟩ have hqp : (q : Poset M I κ) ≤ p := hqp₀.trans hp₀ have hrsize : Cardinal.mk r.range ≤ μ := by rw [Diagram.cardinal_range,hcard] let B := labelOutside (M := M) hμ c r.range hrsize have hB : ∀ t, S.atomic.MemF t B (choiceFailureFamily (M := M) (I := I) hμ c) := labelOutside_mem_family hμ c r.range hrsize (Diagram.exists_outside r hsize) obtain ⟨s,hsq,y,hy,hym⟩ := hs B q hqp (hB q) q le_rfl obtain ⟨s',hs's,j,hjr,hyj⟩ := (mem_labelOutside hμ c r.range hrsize y s).mp hym s le_rfl have hys' : S.App s' f B (label (M := M) hμ c j) := (S.app_congr (S.atomic.eq_refl s' f) (S.atomic.eq_refl s' B) hyj).mp (S.app_mono hs's hy) obtain ⟨t₀,ht₀⟩ := exists_condition_below s' obtain ⟨t,ht,htcover⟩ := Diagram.extend_through hsize e he t₀.2 (J := {j}) (by simpa using (Cardinal.one_le_aleph0.trans (Cardinal.aleph0_le_mk M))) let d : Condition M I κ := (t₀.1,t) have hdt : (d : Poset M I κ) ≤ t₀ := WithTop.coe_le_coe.mpr ⟨le_rfl,⟨e,ht⟩⟩ have hdq : (d : Poset M I κ) ≤ q := hdt.trans (ht₀.trans (hs's.trans hsq)) have htr : t ≤ r := (WithTop.coe_le_coe.mp hdq).2 have hjt : j ∈ t.range := htcover (Set.mem_singleton j) have hdapp : S.App (d : Poset M I κ) f B (label (M := M) hμ c j) := S.app_mono (hdt.trans ht₀) hys' obtain ⟨π,hπ,hi,v,hvd,hvπd⟩ := compatible_placement hsize hmerger r t t htr htr t₀.1 t₀.1 (CohenForcing.Condition.compatible_iff.mpr ⟨_,le_rfl,le_rfl⟩) have hπr : π ∈ SupportFilter.Fix r.range := (SupportFilter.mem_Fix _ _).mpr hπ have hπf : π • f = f := hfix π ((SupportFilter.mem_Fix _ _).mpr (fun j hj => hπ j (hcover hj))) have hπB : π • B = B := smul_labelOutside hμ c r.range hrsize π hπr have hπapp : S.App (permute π d : Poset M I κ) f B (label (M := M) hμ c (π j)) := by have hh := (S.app_symmetry π (d : Poset M I κ) f B (label (M := M) hμ c j)).mp hdapp simpa only [S,move_coe,hπf,hπB,smul_label] using hh have hvd' : (v : Poset M I κ) ≤ d := WithTop.coe_le_coe.mpr hvd have hvπd' : (v : Poset M I κ) ≤ permute π d := WithTop.coe_le_coe.mpr hvπd have hjπ : j ≠ π j := by intro hj apply hjr rw [← hi] refine ⟨hjt,?_⟩ rw [Diagram.range_permute] exact ⟨j,hjt,hj.symm⟩ apply label_not_equal hμ c hc hjπ (v : Poset M I κ) exact S.functionOn_unique ![f,choiceFailureFamily (M := M) (I := I) hμ c] v 0 1 (S.atomic.forceFormula_mono (hvd'.trans (hdq.trans hqp)) hfun) B (label (M := M) hμ c j) (label (M := M) hμ c (π j)) (hB v) (S.app_mono hvd' hdapp) (S.app_mono hvπd' hπapp) /-- The family in this counterexample consists of nonempty sets, at every condition and with arbitrary HS names as potential elements. -/ theorem forces_members_nonempty (c : κ → ZFSet.{u}) (p : Poset M I κ) : (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).Forces ![choiceFailureFamily (M := M) (I := I) hμ c] p (.all ((Formula.mem 1 0).imp (SetLanguage.nonempty 1))) := by let S := system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ change S.atomic.ForceFormula _ p (.all _) rw [S.atomic.forceFormula_all S.atomic_regular] intro ν rw [S.atomic.forceFormula_imp S.atomic_regular] intro q hqp hm apply (S.forces_nonempty _ q 1).mpr exact ((mem_choiceFailureFamily hμ c ν q).mp hm).2 /-- The actual product symmetric system forces the negation of the encoded first-order Axiom of Choice. No rank bound or countability restriction is placed on the potential choosing graph. -/ theorem forces_not_AC [Infinite M] [Infinite I] [Uncountable κ] (hcard : Cardinal.mk M = μ) (hsize : Cardinal.mk M < Cardinal.mk I) (hmerger : HasFiniteMergers M) (e : M) (he : Cardinal.mk ((Set.range (fun x : M => e * x))ᶜ : Set M) = Cardinal.mk M) (c : κ → ZFSet.{u}) (hc : Function.Injective c) (p : Poset M I κ) : (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).Forces Fin.elim0 p SetLanguage.AC.neg := by let S := system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ apply (S.atomic.forceFormula_neg S.atomic_regular _ _ _).mpr intro q hqp hAC rw [SetLanguage.AC,S.atomic.forceFormula_all S.atomic_regular] at hAC have hh := hAC (choiceFailureFamily (M := M) (I := I) hμ c) rw [S.atomic.forceFormula_imp S.atomic_regular] at hh have hv : Fin.snoc Fin.elim0 (choiceFailureFamily (M := M) (I := I) hμ c) = ![choiceFailureFamily (M := M) (I := I) hμ c] := by ext i; fin_cases i; rfl rw [hv] at hh have hh' := hh q le_rfl (forces_members_nonempty hμ c q) obtain ⟨r,hrq,f,hf⟩ := hh' q le_rfl apply not_choiceOn hμ hcard hsize hmerger e he c hc f r apply (S.forces_choiceOn _ r 0 1).mpr exact (S.forces_choiceOn _ r 1 0).mp hf end end PartitionConsistency.ProductForcing /-! ## LocalDecision -/ namespace PartitionConsistency.ProductForcing universe u open SetForcingNames SetForcingNames.SymmetricSystem DiagramForcing noncomputable section variable {M I κ : Type u} [LeftCancelMonoid M] [DiagramOrder.IsConical M] variable {μ : Cardinal.{u}} (hμ : Cardinal.aleph0 ≤ μ) /-- The direct product-forcing version of decision over a supporting root. Any assertion forced below the root is already forced at the root, with only the witnessing Cohen condition's root restriction retained. All parameters are arbitrary-rank HS names. -/ theorem forces_at_supporting_root [Infinite M] [Infinite I] (hsize : Cardinal.mk M < Cardinal.mk I) (hmerger : HasFiniteMergers M) {n} (φ : Formula n) (v : Fin n → (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).Name) (p s : Diagram M I) (hsp : s ≤ p) (hsup : ∀ π ∈ SupportFilter.Fix p.range, ∀ i, π • v i = v i) (d : CohenForcing.Condition I κ) (h : (system hμ).Forces v ((d,s) : Poset M I κ) φ) : (system hμ).Forces v (((d.restrict p.range),p) : Poset M I κ) φ := by let S := system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ let : Nonempty (Diagram M I) := ⟨p⟩ apply S.atomic.forceFormula_of_dense S.atomic_regular intro q hqp obtain ⟨q₀,hq₀⟩ := exists_condition_below q have hq : q₀ ≤ (d.restrict p.range,p) := WithTop.coe_le_coe.mp (hq₀.trans hqp) have hroot : CohenForcing.Condition.Compatible (q₀.1.restrict p.range) (d.restrict p.range) := CohenForcing.Condition.compatible_iff.mpr ⟨q₀.1,q₀.1.le_restrict _,hq.1⟩ obtain ⟨π,hπ,_,t,htq,htπ⟩ := compatible_placement hsize hmerger p q₀.2 s hq.2 hsp q₀.1 d hroot have hv : (fun i => π • v i) = v := funext (hsup π ((SupportFilter.mem_Fix _ _).mpr hπ)) have ht : S.Forces v ((permute π (d,s)) : Poset M I κ) φ := by have hh := (S.forces_symmetry π φ v ((d,s) : Poset M I κ)).mp h simpa only [hv,S,move_coe] using hh exact ⟨t,(WithTop.coe_le_coe.mpr htq).trans hq₀, S.atomic.forceFormula_mono (WithTop.coe_le_coe.mpr htπ) ht⟩ /-- In particular, irrelevant Cohen coordinates can be removed from a condition whose diagram supports its entire parameter tuple. -/ theorem forces_iff_restrict [Infinite M] [Infinite I] (hsize : Cardinal.mk M < Cardinal.mk I) (hmerger : HasFiniteMergers M) {n} (φ : Formula n) (v : Fin n → (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).Name) (p : Diagram M I) (hsup : ∀ π ∈ SupportFilter.Fix p.range, ∀ i, π • v i = v i) (d : CohenForcing.Condition I κ) : (system hμ).Forces v ((d,p) : Poset M I κ) φ ↔ (system hμ).Forces v (((d.restrict p.range),p) : Poset M I κ) φ := ⟨forces_at_supporting_root hμ hsize hmerger φ v p p le_rfl hsup d, (system hμ).atomic.forceFormula_mono (WithTop.coe_le_coe.mpr ⟨d.le_restrict _,le_rfl⟩)⟩ /-- Opposite answers about a root-supported tuple cannot have compatible Cohen restrictions to that root, regardless of their stronger diagrams. -/ theorem incompatible_root_of_opposite [Infinite M] [Infinite I] (hsize : Cardinal.mk M < Cardinal.mk I) (hmerger : HasFiniteMergers M) {n} (φ : Formula n) (v : Fin n → (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).Name) (p s t : Diagram M I) (hsp : s ≤ p) (htp : t ≤ p) (hsup : ∀ π ∈ SupportFilter.Fix p.range, ∀ i, π • v i = v i) (d c : CohenForcing.Condition I κ) (h : (system hμ).Forces v ((d,s) : Poset M I κ) φ) (hn : (system hμ).Forces v ((c,t) : Poset M I κ) φ.neg) : ¬ CohenForcing.Condition.Compatible (d.restrict p.range) (c.restrict p.range) := by intro hc obtain ⟨a,had,hac⟩ := CohenForcing.Condition.compatible_iff.mp hc let S := system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ have hd := forces_at_supporting_root hμ hsize hmerger φ v p s hsp hsup d h have hc := forces_at_supporting_root hμ hsize hmerger φ.neg v p t htp hsup c hn have hneg := (S.atomic.forceFormula_neg S.atomic_regular v (((c.restrict p.range),p) : Poset M I κ) φ).mp hc exact hneg ((a,p) : Poset M I κ) (WithTop.coe_le_coe.mpr ⟨hac,le_rfl⟩) (S.atomic.forceFormula_mono (p := (((d.restrict p.range),p) : Poset M I κ)) (q := ((a,p) : Poset M I κ)) (WithTop.coe_le_coe.mpr ⟨had,le_rfl⟩) hd) end end PartitionConsistency.ProductForcing end OAI