import Mathlib import OAI.SetTheory.PartitionConsistency.Models.OrbitAssignments namespace OAI /-! ## AssignedGraph -/ namespace PartitionConsistency.ProductForcing.ChainCode universe u open SetForcingNames SetForcingNames.SymmetricSystem DiagramForcing ForcingQuotient open DiagramOrder LocalDiagramSystem noncomputable section variable {M I κ : Type u} [LeftCancelMonoid M] [IsConical M] variable {μ : Cardinal.{u}} (hμ : Cardinal.aleph0 ≤ μ) (c : κ → ZFSet.{u}) variable [Infinite M] [Infinite I] [LinearOrder κ] [WellFoundedLT κ] variable (hcard : Cardinal.mk M ≤ μ) (hsize : Cardinal.mk M < Cardinal.mk I) variable (hmerger : HasFiniteMergers M) (hj : HasConditionalJoins (LeftDivOrder M)) variable (H : HeightCost (LeftDivOrder M)) {q : Diagram M I} variable (E : (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).Name) variable (hE : ∀ π ∈ SupportFilter.Fix q.range, π • E = E) local notation "S" => system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ /-- A bounded graph entry is witnessed by a genuine local assignment, with forced equality to its literal label and its normalized class name. -/ def GraphWitness (p : Poset M I κ) (x y : (S).Name) : Prop := ∃ (d : CohenForcing.Condition I κ) (w : Vertex q) (j : I) (τ : LocalName hμ c w.diagram), p ≤ (d,w.diagram) ∧ Assigned hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE d w j τ.name ∧ (S).atomic.EqF p x (label hμ c j) ∧ (S).atomic.EqF p y τ.name /-- Density closure of the literal entry relation. -/ def GraphHolds (p : Poset M I κ) (x y : (S).Name) : Prop := ∀ r, r ≤ p → ∃ s, s ≤ r ∧ GraphWitness hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE s x y theorem graphWitness_mono {p r : Poset M I κ} {x y : (S).Name} (hr : r ≤ p) (h : GraphWitness hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE p x y) : GraphWitness hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE r x y := by obtain ⟨d,w,j,τ,hp,ha,hx,hy⟩ := h exact ⟨d,w,j,τ,hr.trans hp,ha,(S).atomic.eq_mono hr hx,(S).atomic.eq_mono hr hy⟩ def graphRelation : (S).BinaryRelation where holds := GraphHolds hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE mono h hh r hr := hh r (hr.trans h) regular h r hr := by obtain ⟨s,hs,hh⟩ := h r hr obtain ⟨t,ht,hw⟩ := hh s le_rfl exact ⟨t,ht.trans hs,hw⟩ congr := by intro p x x' y y' hx hy have step {x x' y y' : (S).Name} (hx : (S).atomic.EqF p x x') (hy : (S).atomic.EqF p y y') (h : GraphHolds hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE p x y) : GraphHolds hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE p x' y' := by intro r hr obtain ⟨s,hs,d,w,j,τ,hp,ha,hxj,hyτ⟩ := h r hr exact ⟨s,hs,d,w,j,τ,hp,ha, (S).atomic.eq_trans ((S).atomic.eq_symm ((S).atomic.eq_mono (hs.trans hr) hx)) hxj, (S).atomic.eq_trans ((S).atomic.eq_symm ((S).atomic.eq_mono (hs.trans hr) hy)) hyτ⟩ exact ⟨step hx hy,step ((S).atomic.eq_symm hx) ((S).atomic.eq_symm hy)⟩ theorem graphWitness_holds {p : Poset M I κ} {x y : (S).Name} (h : GraphWitness hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE p x y) : (graphRelation hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE).holds p x y := fun r hr => ⟨r,le_rfl,graphWitness_mono hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE hr h⟩ /-- Each literal entry really has its value in the quotient set. -/ theorem graphWitness_bounds {p : Poset M I κ} {x y : (S).Name} (h : GraphWitness hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE p x y) : (S).atomic.MemF p x (labelSet hμ c) ∧ (S).atomic.MemF p y (quotientName hμ c E) := by obtain ⟨d,w,j,τ,hp,ha,hx,hy⟩ := h obtain ⟨_,_,hclass,_⟩ := assigned_stable hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE ha exact ⟨((S).atomic.mem_congr hx ((S).atomic.eq_refl p _)).mpr (label_mem_labelSet hμ c j p), ((S).atomic.mem_congr hy ((S).atomic.eq_refl p _)).mpr ((S).atomic.mem_mono hp ((mem_quotientName_iff_isClass hμ c E τ.name _).mpr hclass))⟩ /-- Moving the condition, diagram, name and label together preserves the literal graph predicate. The change of Cohen computation is essential. -/ theorem graphWitness_move (g : Vertex.RootGroup q) {p : Poset M I κ} {x y : (S).Name} (h : GraphWitness hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE p x y) : GraphWitness hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE ((S).move g.val p) (g • x) (g • y) := by obtain ⟨d,w,j,τ,hp,ha,hx,hy⟩ := h refine ⟨g • d,g • w,g • j,τ.transport hμ g.val,?_, assigned_permute hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE g ha,?_,?_⟩ · change (S).move g.val p ≤ ((d.permute g.val,w.diagram.permute g.val) : Poset M I κ) simpa only [move_coe,permute] using ((S).move g.val).monotone hp · change (S).atomic.EqF ((S).move g.val p) (g.val • x) (label hμ c (g.val j)) simpa only [smul_label] using ((S).eq_symmetry g.val p x (label hμ c j)).mp hx · exact ((S).eq_symmetry g.val p y τ.name).mp hy theorem graphRelation_move (g : Equiv.Perm I) (hg : g ∈ SupportFilter.Fix q.range) (p : Poset M I κ) (x y : (S).Name) (h : (graphRelation hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE).holds p x y) : (graphRelation hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE).holds ((S).move g p) (g • x) (g • y) := by intro r hr obtain ⟨s,hs,hw⟩ := h (((S).move g).symm r) (((S).move g).symm_apply_le.mpr hr) exact ⟨(S).move g s,((S).move g).le_symm_apply.mp hs, graphWitness_move hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE ⟨g,hg⟩ hw⟩ /-- The collected graph is a set-sized HS name with the single support D_q. -/ def assignmentGraph : (S).Name := (graphRelation hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE).graph (labelSet hμ c) (quotientName hμ c E) (SupportFilter.Fix q.range) (localList_support hμ hcard q) (fun g _ => smul_labelSet hμ c g) (fun g hg => quotientName_fixed hμ c E g (hE g hg)) (graphRelation_move hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE) /-- Single-valuedness is proved at common extensions of actual diagram entries; no common preassigned component is assumed. -/ theorem graphRelation_one [Uncountable κ] (hc : Function.Injective c) {p : Poset M I κ} {x y z : (S).Name} (h : (graphRelation hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE).holds p x y) (h' : (graphRelation hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE).holds p x z) : (S).atomic.EqF p y z := by let : Nonempty (Diagram M I) := ⟨q⟩ apply (S).atomic_regular.1 intro r hr obtain ⟨s,hs,d,w,j,τ,hsp,ha,hxj,hyτ⟩ := h r hr obtain ⟨t,ht,e,v,k,σ,htp,hb,hxk,hzσ⟩ := h' s (hs.trans hr) obtain ⟨a,hat⟩ := exists_condition_below t have haj := WithTop.coe_le_coe.mp (hat.trans (ht.trans hsp)) have hak := WithTop.coe_le_coe.mp (hat.trans htp) have hjk : j = k := by by_contra hn exact label_not_equal hμ c hc hn (a : Poset M I κ) ((S).atomic.eq_trans ((S).atomic.eq_symm ((S).atomic.eq_mono (hat.trans ht) hxj)) ((S).atomic.eq_mono hat hxk)) subst k have heq := assigned_compatible_one hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE ha hb haj.1 hak.1 a.2 haj.2 hak.2 exact ⟨a,(hat.trans ht).trans hs,(S).atomic.eq_trans ((S).atomic.eq_mono (hat.trans ht) hyτ) ((S).atomic.eq_trans heq ((S).atomic.eq_symm ((S).atomic.eq_mono hat hzσ)))⟩ /-- Equal graph values have equal labels, even before the cardinality conditions used to prove totality have been imposed. -/ theorem graphRelation_inj {p : Poset M I κ} {x y z : (S).Name} (h : (graphRelation hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE).holds p x z) (h' : (graphRelation hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE).holds p y z) : (S).atomic.EqF p x y := by let : Nonempty (Diagram M I) := ⟨q⟩ apply (S).atomic_regular.1 intro r hr obtain ⟨s,hs,d,w,j,τ,hsp,ha,hxj,hzτ⟩ := h r hr obtain ⟨t,ht,e,v,k,σ,htp,hb,hyk,hzσ⟩ := h' s (hs.trans hr) obtain ⟨a,hat⟩ := exists_condition_below t have haj := WithTop.coe_le_coe.mp (hat.trans (ht.trans hsp)) have hak := WithTop.coe_le_coe.mp (hat.trans htp) have heq := (S).atomic.eq_trans ((S).atomic.eq_symm ((S).atomic.eq_mono (hat.trans ht) hzτ)) ((S).atomic.eq_mono hat hzσ) have hjk := assigned_compatible_inj hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE ha hb haj.1 hak.1 a.2 haj.2 hak.2 heq subst k exact ⟨a,(hat.trans ht).trans hs,(S).atomic.eq_trans ((S).atomic.eq_mono (hat.trans ht) hxj) ((S).atomic.eq_symm ((S).atomic.eq_mono hat hyk))⟩ end end PartitionConsistency.ProductForcing.ChainCode /-! ## GraphDensity -/ namespace PartitionConsistency.ProductForcing.ChainCode universe u open SetForcingNames SetForcingNames.SymmetricSystem DiagramForcing ForcingQuotient open DiagramOrder LocalDiagramSystem noncomputable section variable {M I κ : Type u} [LeftCancelMonoid M] [IsConical M] variable {μ : Cardinal.{u}} (hμ : Cardinal.aleph0 ≤ μ) (c : κ → ZFSet.{u}) variable [Infinite M] [Infinite I] [LinearOrder κ] [WellFoundedLT κ] variable (hcard : Cardinal.mk M ≤ μ) (hsize : Cardinal.mk M < Cardinal.mk I) variable (hmerger : HasFiniteMergers M) (hj : HasConditionalJoins (LeftDivOrder M)) variable (H : HeightCost (LeftDivOrder M)) {q : Diagram M I} variable (E : (system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ).Name) variable (hE : ∀ π ∈ SupportFilter.Fix q.range, π • E = E) local notation "S" => system (M := M) (I := I) (κ := κ) hμ variable (e₀ : M) variable (hcomp : Cardinal.mk ((Set.range (fun x : M => e₀*x))ᶜ : Set M) = Cardinal.mk M) variable (d₀ : CohenForcing.Condition I κ) variable (hsel : ∀ a : Vertex.ComponentOrbit (q := q) hj, ∀ e : CohenForcing.Condition I κ, ∃ f, f ≤ e ∧ ((Vertex.orbitChain hj H a).tailData hj).Good f) variable (hcount : ∀ d : CohenForcing.Condition I κ, d ≤ d₀ → ∀ a : Vertex.ComponentOrbit (q := q) hj, ∀ g : Vertex.RootGroup q, OrdinalCount hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj E hE (Vertex.orbitChain hj H a) (g • d)) include e₀ hcomp hsel hcount /-- All label coordinates can be covered by strengthened diagrams. Thus dense local totality gives totality of the one actual graph. -/ theorem graphRelation_total (x : (S).Name) (p : Poset M I κ) (hp : p ≤ (d₀,q)) (hx : (S).atomic.MemF p x (labelSet hμ c)) : ∀ r, r ≤ p → ∃ s, s ≤ r ∧ ∃ y : (S).Name, (S).atomic.MemF s y (quotientName hμ c E) ∧ (graphRelation hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE).holds s x y := by intro r hr obtain ⟨s,hs,j,hxj⟩ := (mem_labelSet hμ c x p).mp hx r hr let : Nonempty (Diagram M I) := ⟨q⟩ obtain ⟨a,has⟩ := exists_condition_below s have ha := WithTop.coe_le_coe.mp ((has.trans hs).trans (hr.trans hp)) have hsizej : Cardinal.mk ({j} : Set I) ≤ Cardinal.mk M := by simpa only [Cardinal.mk_singleton] using Cardinal.one_le_aleph0.trans (Cardinal.aleph0_le_mk M) obtain ⟨t,hta,hjt⟩ := Diagram.extend_through hsize e₀ hcomp a.2 hsizej have ht : t ≤ a.2 := ⟨e₀,hta⟩ obtain ⟨b,hb⟩ := ht.trans ha.2 let w := labelVertex t b hb j (hjt (Set.mem_singleton j)) obtain ⟨d,hda,τ,hA⟩ := assigned_total hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE a.1 hsel (hcount a.1 ha.1) w j (labelVertex_mem t b hb j (hjt (Set.mem_singleton j))) have hds : ((d,t) : Poset M I κ) ≤ s := (WithTop.coe_le_coe.mpr (show (d,t) ≤ a from ⟨hda,ht⟩)).trans has have hw : GraphWitness hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE (d,t) x τ.name := ⟨d,w,j,τ,le_rfl,hA,(S).atomic.eq_mono hds hxj,(S).atomic.eq_refl _ _⟩ exact ⟨(d,t),hds.trans hs,τ.name, (graphWitness_bounds hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE hw).2, graphWitness_holds hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE hw⟩ /-- Every actual quotient member is locally a canonical class of some label. After placing that label in a diagram and stabilizing availability, the onto assertion for its exact fiber supplies a graph preimage. -/ theorem graphRelation_onto (y : (S).Name) (p : Poset M I κ) (hp : p ≤ (d₀,q)) (hy : (S).atomic.MemF p y (quotientName hμ c E)) : ∀ r, r ≤ p → ∃ s, s ≤ r ∧ ∃ x : (S).Name, (S).atomic.MemF s x (labelSet hμ c) ∧ (graphRelation hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE).holds s x y := by intro r hr obtain ⟨s,hs,j,hyj⟩ := (mem_quotientName hμ c E y p).mp hy r hr let : Nonempty (Diagram M I) := ⟨q⟩ obtain ⟨a,has⟩ := exists_condition_below s have ha := WithTop.coe_le_coe.mp ((has.trans hs).trans (hr.trans hp)) have hsizej : Cardinal.mk ({j} : Set I) ≤ Cardinal.mk M := by simpa only [Cardinal.mk_singleton] using Cardinal.one_le_aleph0.trans (Cardinal.aleph0_le_mk M) obtain ⟨t,hta,hjt⟩ := Diagram.extend_through hsize e₀ hcomp a.2 hsizej have ht : t ≤ a.2 := ⟨e₀,hta⟩ obtain ⟨b,hb⟩ := ht.trans ha.2 have hEt := supported_mono hμ (ht.trans ha.2) E hE let τ := localLabelClass hμ c t E hEt j (hjt (Set.mem_singleton j)) obtain ⟨d,hda,hstable⟩ := forcedAvailability_dense_stable hμ c hcard hsize hmerger H hj a.1 t b τ let w : Vertex q := ⟨t,b,hb,forcedAvailability hμ c hcard hsize hmerger d t b τ⟩ have hτ : StableAt hμ c hcard hsize hmerger E d w τ.name := ⟨τ,rfl,forces_localLabelClass_isClass hμ c t E hEt j (hjt (Set.mem_singleton j)) (d,t),hstable⟩ obtain ⟨f,hfd,k,hA⟩ := assigned_onto hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE d hsel (hcount d (hda.trans ha.1)) w τ.name hτ have hfs : ((f,t) : Poset M I κ) ≤ s := (WithTop.coe_le_coe.mpr (show (f,t) ≤ a from ⟨hfd.trans hda,ht⟩)).trans has have hw : GraphWitness hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE (f,t) (label hμ c k) y := ⟨f,w,k,τ,le_rfl,hA,(S).atomic.eq_refl _ _,(S).atomic.eq_mono hfs hyj⟩ exact ⟨(f,t),hfs.trans hs,label hμ c k,label_mem_labelSet hμ c k ((f,t) : Poset M I κ), graphWitness_holds hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE hw⟩ /-- Under the explicitly stated dense count and selector facts the actual HS graph is a bijection. These facts are discharged for the concrete monoid and forcing in the construction, rather than being model axioms. -/ theorem assignmentGraph_bijection [Uncountable κ] (hc : Function.Injective c) : (S).Forces ![assignmentGraph hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE, labelSet hμ c,quotientName hμ c E] ((d₀,q) : Poset M I κ) ((SetLanguage.surjection 0 1 2).conj (SetLanguage.injection 0 1 2)) := by apply And.intro · apply (graphRelation hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE).graph_surjection · exact graphRelation_total hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE e₀ hcomp d₀ hsel hcount · intro p _ x y z exact graphRelation_one hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE hc · exact graphRelation_onto hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE e₀ hcomp d₀ hsel hcount · apply (graphRelation hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE).graph_injection · exact graphRelation_total hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE e₀ hcomp d₀ hsel hcount · intro p _ x y z exact graphRelation_one hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE hc · intro p _ x y z exact graphRelation_inj hμ c hcard hsize hmerger hj H E hE end end PartitionConsistency.ProductForcing.ChainCode /-! ## CountableHull -/ /-! Small hulls for countably-ary operations, used for the chain condition of countable Cohen forcing. The construction is a genuine well-founded term algebra; no elementary-submodel or large-cardinal assumption is needed. -/ namespace PartitionConsistency.CountableHull universe u noncomputable section open scoped Classical variable {A X : Type u} private def Arity : Option A → Type u | none => PEmpty | some _ => ULift.{u} ℕ private def evaluate (base : X) (op : A → (ℕ → X) → X) : WType (@Arity A) → X := WType.elim _ (fun ⟨a,args⟩ => match a with | none => base | some a => op a (fun n => args ⟨n⟩)) /-- Closure under any small family of countably-ary operations has size at most a fixed point of countable exponentiation. -/ theorem exists_closed {μ : Cardinal.{u}} (hω : Cardinal.aleph0 ≤ μ) (hpower : μ ^ Cardinal.aleph0 = μ) (hA : Cardinal.mk A ≤ μ) (base : X) (op : A → (ℕ → X) → X) : ∃ S : Set X, Cardinal.mk S ≤ μ ∧ base ∈ S ∧ ∀ a f, (∀ n, f n ∈ S) → op a f ∈ S := by have hlabels : Cardinal.mk (Option A) ≤ μ := by simpa only [Cardinal.mk_option] using (add_le_add hA (Cardinal.one_le_aleph0.trans hω)).trans_eq (Cardinal.add_eq_self hω) have harity (a : Option A) : Cardinal.mk (Arity a) ≤ Cardinal.aleph0 := by cases a <;> simp [Arity] have htree : Cardinal.mk (WType (@Arity A)) ≤ μ := by apply WType.cardinalMk_le_of_le calc Cardinal.sum (fun a : Option A => μ ^ Cardinal.mk (Arity a)) ≤ Cardinal.sum (fun _ : Option A => μ) := by apply Cardinal.sum_le_sum intro a exact (Cardinal.power_le_power_left (ne_of_gt (Cardinal.aleph0_pos.trans_le hω)) (harity a)).trans_eq hpower _ = Cardinal.mk (Option A) * μ := by simp _ ≤ μ * μ := mul_le_mul' hlabels le_rfl _ = μ := Cardinal.mul_eq_self hω refine ⟨Set.range (evaluate base op),?_,?_,?_⟩ · exact Cardinal.mk_range_le.trans htree · exact ⟨WType.mk none PEmpty.elim,rfl⟩ · intro a f hf choose t ht using hf exact ⟨WType.mk (some a) (fun n => t n.down),by change op a (fun n => evaluate base op (t n)) = op a f exact congrArg (op a) (funext ht)⟩ end end PartitionConsistency.CountableHull /-! ## CohenChain -/ /-! Chain condition for the actual countable Cohen conditions. The small hull is a well-founded term algebra, so this proof adds no hypothesis about an elementary submodel or a delta-system. -/ namespace PartitionConsistency.CohenForcing.Condition universe u noncomputable section open scoped Classical variable {I κ : Type u} private theorem exists_code (d : Condition I κ) : ∃ f : ℕ → Option ((I × κ) × Bool), Set.range f = Set.insert none (Option.some '' d.graph) := by obtain ⟨f,hf⟩ := ((d.countable_graph.image Option.some).insert none).exists_eq_range (Set.insert_nonempty _ _) exact ⟨f,hf.symm⟩ private def code (d : Condition I κ) : ℕ → Option ((I × κ) × Bool) := (exists_code d).choose private theorem code_range (d : Condition I κ) : Set.range (code d) = Set.insert none (Option.some '' d.graph) := (exists_code d).choose_spec private theorem enriched_graph_injective : Function.Injective (fun d : Condition I κ => Set.insert none (Option.some '' d.graph)) := by intro d e h apply ext ext z have hz := Set.ext_iff.mp h (some z) change (some z = none ∨ ∃ x ∈ d.graph, some x = some z) ↔ (some z = none ∨ ∃ x ∈ e.graph, some x = some z) at hz simpa only [Option.some_ne_none,Option.some.injEq,exists_eq_right,false_or] using hz private theorem code_injective : Function.Injective (code (I := I) (κ := κ)) := by intro d e h apply enriched_graph_injective dsimp only rw [← code_range,← code_range,h] private def decode (f : ℕ → Option ((I × κ) × Bool)) : Condition I κ := if h : ∃ d : Condition I κ, Set.range f = Set.insert none (Option.some '' d.graph) then h.choose else ⊤ private theorem decode_code (d : Condition I κ) : decode (code d) = d := by have h : ∃ e : Condition I κ, Set.range (code d) = Set.insert none (Option.some '' e.graph) := ⟨d,code_range d⟩ rw [decode,dite_eq_left h] exact enriched_graph_injective (h.choose_spec.symm.trans (code_range d)) private def compatibleChoice (A : Set (Condition I κ)) (d : Condition I κ) : Condition I κ := if h : ∃ e ∈ A, Compatible d e then h.choose else ⊤ private theorem compatibleChoice_spec (A : Set (Condition I κ)) (d : Condition I κ) (h : ∃ e ∈ A, Compatible d e) : compatibleChoice A d ∈ A ∧ Compatible d (compatibleChoice A d) := by rw [compatibleChoice,dite_eq_left h] exact h.choose_spec private def flip : Option ((I × κ) × Bool) → Option ((I × κ) × Bool) | none => none | some (a,b) => some (a,!b) private def restrictedGraph (p : Condition I κ) (S : Set (Option ((I × κ) × Bool))) : Condition I κ where graph := {z | z ∈ p.graph ∧ some z ∈ S} functional a b c hb hc := p.functional a b c hb.1 hc.1 countable_graph := p.countable_graph.mono (fun _ h => h.1) /-- Every pairwise incompatible set of countable binary conditions has size at most any infinite fixed point of countable exponentiation. In particular the forcing is `(2^ℵ₀)⁺`-c.c., irrespective of its coordinate set. -/ theorem antichain_cardinal_le {μ : Cardinal.{u}} (hω : Cardinal.aleph0 ≤ μ) (hpower : μ ^ Cardinal.aleph0 = μ) (A : Set (Condition I κ)) (hA : ∀ p ∈ A, ∀ q ∈ A, Compatible p q → p = q) : Cardinal.mk A ≤ μ := by let op (a : ULift.{u} (Bool × ℕ)) (f : ℕ → Option ((I × κ) × Bool)) := if a.down.1 then code (compatibleChoice A (decode f)) a.down.2 else flip (f a.down.2) have hops : Cardinal.mk (ULift.{u} (Bool × ℕ)) ≤ μ := by simpa only [Cardinal.mk_uLift,Cardinal.mk_prod,Cardinal.mk_bool,Cardinal.mk_nat, Cardinal.lift_aleph0,Cardinal.lift_id,Cardinal.ofNat_mul_aleph0] using hω obtain ⟨S,hS,hnone,hclosed⟩ := CountableHull.exists_closed hω hpower hops (none : Option ((I × κ) × Bool)) op have hflip (z : Option ((I × κ) × Bool)) (hz : z ∈ S) : flip z ∈ S := hclosed ⟨(false,0)⟩ (fun _ => z) (fun _ => hz) have hbits (a : I × κ) (b c : Bool) (h : some (a,b) ∈ S) : some (a,c) ∈ S := by cases b <;> cases c · exact h · exact hflip _ h · exact hflip _ h · exact h have hcode {d : Condition I κ} (hs : ∀ z ∈ d.graph, some z ∈ S) : ∀ n, code d n ∈ S := by intro n have hn := Set.range_subset_iff.mp (show Set.range (code d) ⊆ S by rw [code_range] exact Set.insert_subset hnone (by rintro _ ⟨z,hz,rfl⟩; exact hs z hz)) n exact hn have hin (p : Condition I κ) (hp : p ∈ A) : ∀ z ∈ p.graph, some z ∈ S := by let d := restrictedGraph p S have hd : Compatible d p := fun a b c hb hc => p.functional a b c hb.1 hc have hb := compatibleChoice_spec A d ⟨p,hp,hd⟩ let b := compatibleChoice A d have hbS (n : ℕ) : code b n ∈ S := by have hh := hclosed ⟨(true,n)⟩ (code d) (hcode (fun z hz => hz.2)) simpa [op,decode_code,b] using hh have hbgraph (z : (I × κ) × Bool) (hz : z ∈ b.graph) : some z ∈ S := by have hr : some z ∈ Set.range (code b) := by rw [code_range] exact Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hz) obtain ⟨n,hn⟩ := hr exact hn ▸ hbS n have hbp : Compatible p b := by intro a x y hx hy apply hb.2 a x y ⟨hx,?_⟩ hy exact hbits a y x (hbgraph _ hy) have he : p = b := hA p hp b hb.1 hbp exact he ▸ hbgraph let pack (p : A) : ℕ → S := fun n => ⟨code p.val n,hcode (hin p.val p.property) n⟩ have hpack : Function.Injective pack := by intro p q h apply Subtype.ext apply code_injective exact funext (fun n => congrArg Subtype.val (congrFun h n)) calc Cardinal.mk A ≤ Cardinal.mk (ℕ → S) := Cardinal.mk_le_of_injective hpack _ = Cardinal.mk S ^ Cardinal.aleph0 := by simp _ ≤ μ ^ Cardinal.aleph0 := Cardinal.power_le_power_right hS _ = μ := hpower /-- The source chain condition, with its precise successor-continuum bound. -/ theorem antichain_continuum (A : Set (Condition I κ)) (hA : ∀ p ∈ A, ∀ q ∈ A, Compatible p q → p = q) : Cardinal.mk A ≤ Cardinal.continuum := antichain_cardinal_le Cardinal.aleph0_le_continuum Cardinal.continuum_power_aleph0 A hA end end PartitionConsistency.CohenForcing.Condition /-! ## ChainPreservation -/ /-! Cardinal preservation from the actual chain condition. The statements below concern the internal set-graph surjection sentence and arbitrary name ranks. No existence of an ambient fully generic filter is used. -/ namespace PartitionConsistency.SetForcingNames.SymmetricSystem universe u v noncomputable section open ForcingQuotient variable {P : Type u} [PartialOrder P] [OrderTop P] {Γ : Type v} [Group Γ] variable (S : SymmetricSystem.{u} P Γ) /-- A chain bound on the concrete forcing order. Compatibility here means existence of a common stronger condition, not agreement of two names. -/ def ChainBound (ν : Cardinal.{u}) : Prop := ∀ A : Set P, (∀ p ∈ A, ∀ q ∈ A, Compatible p q → p = q) → Cardinal.mk A ≤ ν omit [OrderTop P] in /-- A separating family of conditions injects into an antichain. -/ theorem ChainBound.cardinal_le {ν : Cardinal.{u}} (hcc : ChainBound (P := P) ν) {X : Type u} (c : X → P) (hc : ∀ x y, Compatible (c x) (c y) → x = y) : Cardinal.mk X ≤ ν := by have hinj : Function.Injective c := by intro x y he exact hc x y ⟨c x,le_rfl,he ▸ le_rfl⟩ let pack : X → Set.range c := fun x => ⟨c x,⟨x,rfl⟩⟩ have hp : Function.Injective pack := fun x y he => hinj (congrArg Subtype.val he) apply (Cardinal.mk_le_of_injective hp).trans exact hcc _ (by rintro _ ⟨x,rfl⟩ _ ⟨y,rfl⟩ h exact congrArg c (hc x y h)) omit [OrderTop P] in /-- Counting an indexed relation whose witnesses with compatible conditions and equal records must have the same value. -/ theorem ChainBound.cardinal_le_mul {ν : Cardinal.{u}} (hcc : ChainBound (P := P) ν) {A B : Type u} (R : P → A → B → Prop) (total : ∀ b, ∃ a p, R p a b) (single : ∀ a b b' p q, R p a b → R q a b' → Compatible p q → b = b') : Cardinal.mk B ≤ Cardinal.mk A * ν := by let V (a : A) := {b : B // ∃ p, R p a b} have hV (a : A) : Cardinal.mk (V a) ≤ ν := by let c : V a → P := fun b => b.property.choose apply hcc.cardinal_le c intro b b' hc apply Subtype.ext exact single a b.val b'.val (c b) (c b') b.property.choose_spec b'.property.choose_spec hc let pack : B → Σ a : A, V a := fun b => ⟨(total b).choose,⟨b,(total b).choose_spec⟩⟩ have hi : Function.Injective pack := by intro b b' he exact congrArg (fun t : Σ a : A, V a => t.2.val) he calc Cardinal.mk B ≤ Cardinal.mk (Σ a : A, V a) := Cardinal.mk_le_of_injective hi _ = Cardinal.sum (fun a : A => Cardinal.mk (V a)) := Cardinal.mk_sigma _ _ ≤ Cardinal.sum (fun _ : A => ν) := Cardinal.sum_le_sum _ _ hV _ = Cardinal.mk A * ν := by simp /-- For a fixed ground argument of an internal function, the possible values which belong to a ground set form a set of size at most the chain bound. Only the actual function-on formula supplies single-valuedness. -/ theorem possibleValues_cardinal_le {A B : Type u} (a : A → ZFSet.{u}) (b : B → ZFSet.{u}) (hb : Function.Injective b) (f : S.Name) (p : P) (hf : S.Forces ![f,Name.check (ZFSet.range a)] p (SetLanguage.functionOn 0 1)) {ν : Cardinal.{u}} (hcc : ChainBound (P := P) ν) (i : A) : Cardinal.mk {j : B // ∃ q, q ≤ p ∧ S.App q f (Name.check (a i)) (Name.check (b j))} ≤ ν := by classical let V := {j : B // ∃ q, q ≤ p ∧ S.App q f (Name.check (a i)) (Name.check (b j))} let cond : V → P := fun j => j.property.choose have hcond (j : V) : cond j ≤ p ∧ S.App (cond j) f (Name.check (a i)) (Name.check (b j.val)) := j.property.choose_spec have separate (j k : V) (h : Compatible (cond j) (cond k)) : j = k := by obtain ⟨r,hrj,hrk⟩ := h apply Subtype.ext apply hb apply (S.eq_check_iff (b j.val) (b k.val) r).mp exact S.functionOn_unique ![f,Name.check (ZFSet.range a)] r 0 1 (S.atomic.forceFormula_mono (hrj.trans (hcond j).1) hf) (Name.check (a i)) (Name.check (b j.val)) (Name.check (b k.val)) (S.check_mem_of_mem (ZFSet.mem_range.mpr ⟨i,rfl⟩) r) (S.app_mono hrj (hcond j).2) (S.app_mono hrk (hcond k).2) exact hcc.cardinal_le cond separate /-- A forced surjection between two ground sets bounds the ground size of the codomain by the domain size times the forcing's chain bound. This is the possible-values proof of cardinal preservation, with no cardinal-preservation premise hidden in the definition of a forcing extension. -/ theorem cardinal_le_of_forces_surjection {A B : Type u} (a : A → ZFSet.{u}) (b : B → ZFSet.{u}) (hb : Function.Injective b) (f : S.Name) (p : P) (hf : S.Forces ![f,Name.check (ZFSet.range a),Name.check (ZFSet.range b)] p (SetLanguage.surjection 0 1 2)) {ν : Cardinal.{u}} (hcc : ChainBound (P := P) ν) : Cardinal.mk B ≤ Cardinal.mk A * ν := by have hsur := (S.forces_surjection _ p 0 1 2).mp hf have hfun := ((S.forces_mapsTo _ p 0 1 2).mp hsur.1).1 have hex (j : B) : ∃ i : A, ∃ q, q ≤ p ∧ S.App q f (Name.check (a i)) (Name.check (b j)) := by obtain ⟨q,hqp,x,hx,he⟩ := hsur.2 (Name.check (b j)) p le_rfl (S.check_mem_of_mem (ZFSet.mem_range.mpr ⟨j,rfl⟩) p) p le_rfl obtain ⟨r,hrq,z,hz,hxz⟩ := (S.mem_check (ZFSet.range a) x q).mp hx q le_rfl obtain ⟨i,rfl⟩ := ZFSet.mem_range.mp hz exact ⟨i,r,hrq.trans hqp, (S.app_congr (S.atomic.eq_refl r f) hxz (S.atomic.eq_refl r (Name.check (b j)))).mp (S.app_mono hrq he)⟩ let V (i : A) := {j : B // ∃ q, q ≤ p ∧ S.App q f (Name.check (a i)) (Name.check (b j))} let pack : B → Σ i : A, V i := fun j => ⟨(hex j).choose,⟨j,(hex j).choose_spec⟩⟩ have hinj : Function.Injective pack := by intro j k he exact congrArg (fun t : Σ i : A, V i => t.2.val) he calc Cardinal.mk B ≤ Cardinal.mk (Σ i : A, V i) := Cardinal.mk_le_of_injective hinj _ = Cardinal.sum (fun i : A => Cardinal.mk (V i)) := Cardinal.mk_sigma _ _ ≤ Cardinal.sum (fun _ : A => ν) := Cardinal.sum_le_sum _ _ (fun i => S.possibleValues_cardinal_le a b hb f p hfun hcc i) _ = Cardinal.mk A * ν := by simp end end PartitionConsistency.SetForcingNames.SymmetricSystem end OAI