import OAI.SetTheory.PartitionPrinciple.Forcing.AtomicTruth import OAI.SetTheory.PartitionPrinciple.Model import OAI.SetTheory.PartitionPrinciple.Transfinite.CountableCoding namespace OAI namespace PartitionPilot.Forcing namespace SetFormula universe u v theorem map_extend {A : Type u} {B : Type v} {n : Nat} (f : A → B) (x : A) (env : Fin n → A) : (fun i => f (extend x env i)) = extend (f x) (fun i => f (env i)) := by funext i refine Fin.cases ?_ (fun j => ?_) i · rfl · rfl theorem realize_ex (U : Set ZFSet.{u}) {n : Nat} (φ : SetFormula (n + 1)) (env : Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) : Realize U (ex φ) env ↔ ∃ x ∈ U, Realize U φ (extend x env) := by classical simp only [ex, Realize, not_forall, not_not, exists_prop] theorem realize_disj (U : Set ZFSet.{u}) {n : Nat} (φ ψ : SetFormula n) (env : Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) : Realize U (disj φ ψ) env ↔ Realize U φ env ∨ Realize U ψ env := by classical simp only [disj, Realize, not_and_or, not_not] theorem realize_imp (U : Set ZFSet.{u}) {n : Nat} (φ ψ : SetFormula n) (env : Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) : Realize U (imp φ ψ) env ↔ (Realize U φ env → Realize U ψ env) := by classical simp only [imp, Realize, not_and, not_not] end SetFormula namespace SetFormula open SetRealization universe u variable {P : Type u} [Preorder P] {s : Presentation P} abbrev Assignment (D : Name.NameDomain s) (n : Nat) := Fin n → D.names def Forces (D : Name.NameDomain s) : {n : Nat} → SetFormula n → Assignment D n → P → Prop | _, .equal i j, env, p => Name.ForcesEq p (env i).val (env j).val | _, .mem i j, env, p => Name.ForcesMem p (env i).val (env j).val | _, .neg φ, env, p => ∀ q, q ≤ p → ¬ Forces D φ env q | _, .conj φ ψ, env, p => Forces D φ env p ∧ Forces D ψ env p | _, .all φ, env, p => ∀ τ : D.names, Forces D φ (extend τ env) p theorem forces_mono (D : Name.NameDomain s) {n : Nat} (φ : SetFormula n) (env : Assignment D n) {p q : P} (h : Forces D φ env p) (qp : q ≤ p) : Forces D φ env q := by induction φ generalizing p q with | equal i j => exact Name.forcesEq_mono h qp | mem i j => exact Name.forcesMem_mono h qp | neg φ _ => exact fun r rq => h r (rq.trans qp) | conj φ ψ ihφ ihψ => exact ⟨ihφ env h.1 qp, ihψ env h.2 qp⟩ | all φ ih => exact fun τ => ih (extend τ env) (h τ) qp theorem forces_of_dense (D : Name.NameDomain s) {n : Nat} (φ : SetFormula n) (env : Assignment D n) {p : P} (dense : DenseBelow p {q | Forces D φ env q}) : Forces D φ env p := by induction φ generalizing p with | equal i j => exact Name.forcesEq_of_dense dense | mem i j => exact Name.forcesMem_of_dense dense | neg φ _ => intro q qp hq obtain ⟨r, rq, hr⟩ := dense q qp exact hr r le_rfl (forces_mono D φ env hq rq) | conj φ ψ ihφ ihψ => exact ⟨ihφ env (denseBelow_mono dense (fun _ h => h.1)), ihψ env (denseBelow_mono dense (fun _ h => h.2))⟩ | all φ ih => exact fun τ => ih (extend τ env) (denseBelow_mono dense (fun _ h => h τ)) theorem not_forces_refine_neg (D : Name.NameDomain s) {n : Nat} (φ : SetFormula n) (env : Assignment D n) {p : P} (bad : ¬ Forces D φ env p) : ∃ q, q ≤ p ∧ Forces D (.neg φ) env q := by classical have missing : ¬ DenseBelow p {q | Forces D φ env q} := fun h => bad (forces_of_dense D φ env h) change ¬ ∀ q, q ≤ p → ∃ r, r ≤ q ∧ Forces D φ env r at missing push Not at missing exact missing theorem forces_ex_iff (D : Name.NameDomain s) {n : Nat} (φ : SetFormula (n + 1)) (env : Assignment D n) (p : P) : Forces D (ex φ) env p ↔ DenseBelow p {q | ∃ τ : D.names, Forces D φ (extend τ env) q} := by classical change (∀ q, q ≤ p → ¬ ∀ τ : D.names, ∀ r, r ≤ q → ¬ Forces D φ (extend τ env) r) ↔ _ constructor · intro h q qp have witness := h q qp push Not at witness obtain ⟨τ, r, rq, hφ⟩ := witness exact ⟨r, rq, τ, hφ⟩ · intro dense q qp allNeg obtain ⟨r, rq, τ, hφ⟩ := dense q qp exact allNeg τ r rq hφ noncomputable def evalAssignment (H : Set P) {D : Name.NameDomain s} {n : Nat} (env : Assignment D n) : Fin n → ZFSet.{u} := fun i => Name.eval H (env i).val omit [Preorder P] in theorem evalAssignment_extend (H : Set P) {D : Name.NameDomain s} {n : Nat} (τ : D.names) (env : Assignment D n) : evalAssignment H (extend τ env) = extend (Name.eval H τ.val) (evalAssignment H env) := map_extend (fun τ : D.names => Name.eval H τ.val) τ env end SetFormula namespace SetFormula universe u def liftIndex {n m : Nat} (f : Fin n → Fin m) : Fin (n + 1) → Fin (m + 1) := Fin.cases 0 (fun i => (f i).succ) theorem extend_liftIndex {n m : Nat} {A : Type u} (f : Fin n → Fin m) (x : A) (env : Fin m → A) : (fun i => extend x env (liftIndex f i)) = extend x (fun i => env (f i)) := by funext i refine Fin.cases ?_ (fun j => ?_) i <;> rfl def reindex : {n m : Nat} → (Fin n → Fin m) → SetFormula n → SetFormula m | _, _, f, .equal i j => .equal (f i) (f j) | _, _, f, .mem i j => .mem (f i) (f j) | _, _, f, .neg φ => .neg (reindex f φ) | _, _, f, .conj φ ψ => .conj (reindex f φ) (reindex f ψ) | _, _, f, .all φ => .all (reindex (liftIndex f) φ) theorem realize_reindex (U : Set ZFSet.{u}) {n m : Nat} (f : Fin n → Fin m) (φ : SetFormula n) (env : Fin m → ZFSet.{u}) : Realize U (reindex f φ) env ↔ Realize U φ (fun i => env (f i)) := by induction φ generalizing m with | equal i j => rfl | mem i j => rfl | neg φ ih => exact not_congr (ih f env) | conj φ ψ ihφ ihψ => exact and_congr (ihφ f env) (ihψ f env) | all φ ih => change (∀ x ∈ U, Realize U (reindex (liftIndex f) φ) (extend x env)) ↔ _ apply forall_congr' intro x apply forall_congr' intro _ rw [ih, extend_liftIndex] end SetFormula namespace SetFormula open SetRealization universe u variable {P : Type u} [Preorder P] {s : Presentation P} def DecisionWitness (D : Name.NameDomain s) {n : Nat} (φ : SetFormula n) (env : Assignment D n) : Set P := {p | Forces D φ env p ∨ Forces D (.neg φ) env p} theorem decisionWitness_dense (D : Name.NameDomain s) {n : Nat} (φ : SetFormula n) (env : Assignment D n) : Dense (DecisionWitness D φ env) := by classical intro p by_cases possible : ∃ q, q ≤ p ∧ Forces D φ env q · obtain ⟨q, qp, hq⟩ := possible exact ⟨q, qp, Or.inl hq⟩ · exact ⟨p, le_rfl, Or.inr (fun q qp hq => possible ⟨q, qp, hq⟩)⟩ def AllDecisionWitness (D : Name.NameDomain s) {n : Nat} (φ : SetFormula (n + 1)) (env : Assignment D n) : Set P := {p | Forces D (.all φ) env p ∨ ∃ τ : D.names, Forces D (.neg φ) (extend τ env) p} theorem allDecisionWitness_dense (D : Name.NameDomain s) {n : Nat} (φ : SetFormula (n + 1)) (env : Assignment D n) : Dense (AllDecisionWitness D φ env) := by classical intro p by_cases h : Forces D (.all φ) env p · exact ⟨p, le_rfl, Or.inl h⟩ · change ¬ ∀ τ : D.names, Forces D φ (extend τ env) p at h push Not at h obtain ⟨τ, bad⟩ := h obtain ⟨q, qp, neg⟩ := not_forces_refine_neg D φ (extend τ env) bad exact ⟨q, qp, Or.inr ⟨τ, neg⟩⟩ def formulaFamily (D : Name.NameDomain s) : Set (Set P) := Name.atomicFamily D ∪ {E | (∃ (n : Nat) (φ : SetFormula n) (env : Assignment D n), E = DecisionWitness D φ env) ∨ ∃ (n : Nat) (φ : SetFormula (n + 1)) (env : Assignment D n), E = AllDecisionWitness D φ env} end SetFormula namespace SetFormula universe u v def extendMany {n : Nat} {A : Type v} : (k : Nat) → (Fin k → A) → (Fin n → A) → Fin (n + k) → A | 0, _, env => env | k + 1, fields, env => extend (fields 0) (extendMany k (fun j => fields j.succ) env) def prefixIndex (n : Nat) : (k : Nat) → Fin k → Fin (n + k) | 0, i => Fin.elim0 i | k + 1, i => Fin.cases 0 (fun j => (prefixIndex n k j).succ) i def suffixIndex (n : Nat) : (k : Nat) → Fin n → Fin (n + k) | 0, i => i | k + 1, i => (suffixIndex n k i).succ theorem extendMany_prefix {n : Nat} {A : Type v} (k : Nat) (fields : Fin k → A) (env : Fin n → A) (i : Fin k) : extendMany k fields env (prefixIndex n k i) = fields i := by induction k with | zero => exact Fin.elim0 i | succ k ih => exact Fin.cases rfl (fun j => ih (fun a => fields a.succ) j) i theorem extendMany_suffix {n : Nat} {A : Type v} (k : Nat) (fields : Fin k → A) (env : Fin n → A) (i : Fin n) : extendMany k fields env (suffixIndex n k i) = env i := by induction k with | zero => rfl | succ k ih => exact ih (fun a => fields a.succ) theorem extendMany_members {n : Nat} {A : Type v} {U : Set A} (k : Nat) (fields : Fin k → A) (env : Fin n → A) (fieldMembers : ∀ i, fields i ∈ U) (envMembers : ∀ i, env i ∈ U) : ∀ i, extendMany k fields env i ∈ U := by induction k with | zero => exact envMembers | succ k ih => intro i exact Fin.cases (fieldMembers 0) (ih (fun i => fields i.succ) (fun i => fieldMembers i.succ)) i def exBlock {n : Nat} : (k : Nat) → SetFormula (n + k) → SetFormula n | 0, body => body | k + 1, body => exBlock k (ex body) theorem realize_exBlock (U : Set ZFSet.{u}) {n : Nat} (k : Nat) (body : SetFormula (n + k)) (env : Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) : Realize U (exBlock k body) env ↔ ∃ fields : Fin k → ZFSet.{u}, (∀ i, fields i ∈ U) ∧ Realize U body (extendMany k fields env) := by induction k with | zero => constructor · intro value exact ⟨Fin.elim0, fun i => Fin.elim0 i, value⟩ · rintro ⟨_, _, value⟩ exact value | succ k ih => rw [exBlock, ih] constructor · rintro ⟨fields, members, rest⟩ obtain ⟨first, hfirst, value⟩ := (realize_ex U _ _).1 rest let combined : Fin (k + 1) → ZFSet.{u} := Fin.cases first fields refine ⟨combined, ?_, ?_⟩ · intro i exact Fin.cases hfirst members i · exact value · rintro ⟨fields, members, value⟩ refine ⟨fun i => fields i.succ, fun i => members i.succ, ?_⟩ exact (realize_ex U _ _).2 ⟨fields 0, members 0, value⟩ def conjBlock {n : Nat} : (k : Nat) → (Fin k → SetFormula n) → SetFormula n | 0, _ => .all (.equal 0 0) | k + 1, clauses => .conj (clauses 0) (conjBlock k (fun i => clauses i.succ)) theorem realize_conjBlock (U : Set ZFSet.{u}) {n : Nat} (k : Nat) (clauses : Fin k → SetFormula n) (env : Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) : Realize U (conjBlock k clauses) env ↔ ∀ i, Realize U (clauses i) env := by induction k with | zero => exact ⟨fun _ i => Fin.elim0 i, fun _ _ _ => rfl⟩ | succ k ih => change (Realize U (clauses 0) env ∧ Realize U (conjBlock k (fun i => clauses i.succ)) env) ↔ _ rw [ih] exact ⟨fun h => Fin.cases h.1 h.2, fun h => ⟨h 0, fun i => h i.succ⟩⟩ end SetFormula namespace SetFormula open SetRealization universe u variable {P : Type u} [Preorder P] {s : Presentation P} theorem forcing_truth (D : Name.NameDomain s) (H : ConditionFilter P) (generic : H.GenericFor (formulaFamily D)) {n : Nat} (φ : SetFormula n) (env : Assignment D n) : Realize (D.values {p | H.mem p}) φ (evalAssignment {p | H.mem p} env) ↔ ∃ p, H.mem p ∧ Forces D φ env p := by have atoms : H.GenericFor (Name.atomicFamily D) := fun E hE dense => generic E (Or.inl hE) dense induction φ with | equal i j => exact Name.eval_eq_iff_forcesEq D H atoms (env i).property (env j).property | mem i j => exact Name.eval_mem_iff_forcesMem D H atoms (env i).property (env j).property | neg φ ih => constructor · intro notTrue obtain ⟨p, hp, good | bad⟩ := generic (DecisionWitness D φ env) (Or.inr (Or.inl ⟨_, φ, env, rfl⟩)) (decisionWitness_dense D φ env) · exact False.elim (notTrue ((ih env).2 ⟨p, hp, good⟩)) · exact ⟨p, hp, bad⟩ · rintro ⟨p, hp, neg⟩ truth obtain ⟨q, hq, hφ⟩ := (ih env).1 truth obtain ⟨r, _, rp, rq⟩ := H.directed hp hq exact neg r rp (forces_mono D φ env hφ rq) | conj φ ψ ihφ ihψ => constructor · rintro ⟨hφ, hψ⟩ obtain ⟨p, hp, fp⟩ := (ihφ env).1 hφ obtain ⟨q, hq, fq⟩ := (ihψ env).1 hψ obtain ⟨r, hr, rp, rq⟩ := H.directed hp hq exact ⟨r, hr, forces_mono D φ env fp rp, forces_mono D ψ env fq rq⟩ · rintro ⟨p, hp, hφ, hψ⟩ exact ⟨(ihφ env).2 ⟨p, hp, hφ⟩, (ihψ env).2 ⟨p, hp, hψ⟩⟩ | all φ ih => constructor · intro allTrue obtain ⟨p, hp, good | bad⟩ := generic (AllDecisionWitness D φ env) (Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨_, φ, env, rfl⟩)) (allDecisionWitness_dense D φ env) · exact ⟨p, hp, good⟩ · obtain ⟨τ, neg⟩ := bad have truth := allTrue (Name.eval {q | H.mem q} τ.val) ⟨τ, rfl⟩ rw [← evalAssignment_extend] at truth obtain ⟨q, hq, hφ⟩ := (ih (extend τ env)).1 truth obtain ⟨r, _, rp, rq⟩ := H.directed hp hq exact False.elim (neg r rp (forces_mono D φ (extend τ env) hφ rq)) · rintro ⟨p, hp, allForced⟩ x hx obtain ⟨τ, rfl⟩ := hx have truth := (ih (extend τ env)).2 ⟨p, hp, allForced τ⟩ rw [evalAssignment_extend] at truth exact truth theorem forces_sound (D : Name.NameDomain s) (H : ConditionFilter P) (generic : H.GenericFor (formulaFamily D)) {n : Nat} (φ : SetFormula n) (env : Assignment D n) {p : P} (hp : H.mem p) (h : Forces D φ env p) : Realize (D.values {q | H.mem q}) φ (evalAssignment {q | H.mem q} env) := (forcing_truth D H generic φ env).2 ⟨p, hp, h⟩ theorem ex_witness_in_filter (D : Name.NameDomain s) (H : ConditionFilter P) (generic : H.GenericFor (formulaFamily D)) {n : Nat} (φ : SetFormula (n + 1)) (env : Assignment D n) {p : P} (hp : H.mem p) (h : Forces D (ex φ) env p) : ∃ τ : D.names, ∃ q, H.mem q ∧ q ≤ p ∧ Forces D φ (extend τ env) q := by have truth := forces_sound D H generic (ex φ) env hp h obtain ⟨x, hx, hxφ⟩ := (realize_ex _ φ _).1 truth obtain ⟨τ, rfl⟩ := hx rw [← evalAssignment_extend] at hxφ obtain ⟨q, hq, hφ⟩ := (forcing_truth D H generic φ (extend τ env)).1 hxφ obtain ⟨r, hr, rp, rq⟩ := H.directed hp hq exact ⟨τ, r, hr, rp, forces_mono D φ (extend τ env) hφ rq⟩ end SetFormula namespace SetFormula universe u def allBlock {n : Nat} : (k : Nat) → SetFormula (n + k) → SetFormula n | 0, body => body | k + 1, body => allBlock k (.all body) theorem realize_allBlock (U : Set ZFSet.{u}) {n : Nat} (k : Nat) (body : SetFormula (n + k)) (env : Fin n → ZFSet.{u}) : Realize U (allBlock k body) env ↔ ∀ fields : Fin k → ZFSet.{u}, (∀ i, fields i ∈ U) → Realize U body (extendMany k fields env) := by induction k with | zero => exact ⟨fun h _ _ => h, fun h => h Fin.elim0 (fun i => Fin.elim0 i)⟩ | succ k ih => rw [allBlock, ih] constructor · intro h fields ground exact h (fun i => fields i.succ) (fun i => ground i.succ) (fields 0) (ground 0) · intro h fields ground x hx exact h (Fin.cases x fields) (Fin.cases hx ground) end SetFormula namespace SetFormula open SetRealization universe u variable {P : Type u} {s : Presentation P} theorem realize_extensionality (D : Name.NameDomain s) (H : Set P) : Realize (D.values H) extensionality Fin.elim0 := by classical simp only [extensionality, Realize, imp, extend, Fin.cases_zero, not_and, not_not] intro x hx y hy agree apply D.values_extensionality H hx hy intro z hz exact ⟨(agree z hz).1, (agree z hz).2⟩ theorem realize_foundation (D : Name.NameDomain s) (H : Set P) : Realize (D.values H) foundation Fin.elim0 := by classical simp only [foundation, Realize, imp, ex, extend, Fin.cases_zero, not_and, not_not, not_forall, exists_prop] intro x hx inhabited obtain ⟨w, _, wx⟩ := inhabited have nonempty : x ≠ ∅ := by intro eq rw [eq] at wx exact ZFSet.notMem_empty w wx obtain ⟨y, hy, yx, disjoint⟩ := D.values_foundation H hx nonempty refine ⟨y, hy, yx, ?_⟩ rintro ⟨z, _, zx, zy⟩ have member : z ∈ x ∩ y := ZFSet.mem_inter.2 ⟨zx, zy⟩ rw [disjoint] at member exact ZFSet.notMem_empty z member theorem basic_axioms_in_generic [Preorder P] (D : Name.NameDomain s) (H : ConditionFilter P) (generic : H.GenericFor (formulaFamily D)) : ∃ p, H.mem p ∧ Forces D (.conj extensionality foundation) Fin.elim0 p := by apply (forcing_truth D H generic (.conj extensionality foundation) Fin.elim0).1 have env : evalAssignment {p | H.mem p} (Fin.elim0 : Assignment D 0) = Fin.elim0 := by funext i exact Fin.elim0 i rw [env] exact ⟨realize_extensionality D _, realize_foundation D _⟩ end SetFormula namespace SetFormula open Compression.RecursiveMaps def natCode : {n : Nat} → SetFormula n → Nat | _, .equal i j => natPair 0 (natPair i.val j.val) | _, .mem i j => natPair 1 (natPair i.val j.val) | _, .neg φ => natPair 2 (natCode φ) | _, .conj φ ψ => natPair 3 (natPair (natCode φ) (natCode ψ)) | _, .all φ => natPair 4 (natCode φ) theorem natCode_injective {n : Nat} : Function.Injective (@natCode n) := by intro φ induction φ with | equal i j => intro ψ eq cases ψ <;> simp only [natCode] at eq · have parts := natPair_injective (natPair_injective eq).2 exact congrArg₂ SetFormula.equal (Fin.ext parts.1) (Fin.ext parts.2) all_goals have bad := (natPair_injective eq).1; omega | mem i j => intro ψ eq cases ψ <;> simp only [natCode] at eq · have bad := (natPair_injective eq).1; omega · have parts := natPair_injective (natPair_injective eq).2 exact congrArg₂ SetFormula.mem (Fin.ext parts.1) (Fin.ext parts.2) all_goals have bad := (natPair_injective eq).1; omega | neg φ ih => intro ψ eq cases ψ <;> simp only [natCode] at eq · have bad := (natPair_injective eq).1; omega · have bad := (natPair_injective eq).1; omega · exact congrArg SetFormula.neg (ih (natPair_injective eq).2) all_goals have bad := (natPair_injective eq).1; omega | conj φ χ ihφ ihχ => intro ψ eq cases ψ <;> simp only [natCode] at eq · have bad := (natPair_injective eq).1; omega · have bad := (natPair_injective eq).1; omega · have bad := (natPair_injective eq).1; omega · have parts := natPair_injective (natPair_injective eq).2 exact congrArg₂ SetFormula.conj (ihφ parts.1) (ihχ parts.2) · have bad := (natPair_injective eq).1; omega | all φ ih => intro ψ eq cases ψ <;> simp only [natCode] at eq · have bad := (natPair_injective eq).1; omega · have bad := (natPair_injective eq).1; omega · have bad := (natPair_injective eq).1; omega · have bad := (natPair_injective eq).1; omega · exact congrArg SetFormula.all (ih (natPair_injective eq).2) instance countable (n : Nat) : Countable (SetFormula n) := natCode_injective.countable end SetFormula end PartitionPilot.Forcing end OAI