import OAI.SetTheory.PartitionPrinciple.Transfinite.AttachmentCoinitiality namespace OAI section namespace PartitionPilot.Compression.RecursiveMaps.PrincipalAmalgamation open Attachment universe u v structure Input {A : Type u} {B : Type v} (P : MeetOrder A) (Q : MeetOrder B) where leftAnchor : A rightAnchor : B overlap : MeetIso (idealOrder Q rightAnchor) (idealOrder P leftAnchor) namespace Input variable {A : Type u} {B : Type v} {P : MeetOrder A} {Q : MeetOrder B} (g : Input P Q) def Fresh := {b : B // ¬ Q.le b g.rightAnchor} def Node := A ⊕ g.Fresh def shadow (b : B) : A := (g.overlap.toFun (cut Q g.rightAnchor b)).val theorem shadow_le_anchor (b : B) : P.le (g.shadow b) g.leftAnchor := (g.overlap.toFun (cut Q g.rightAnchor b)).property theorem shadow_mono {b c : B} (h : Q.le b c) : P.le (g.shadow b) (g.shadow c) := (g.overlap.le_iff _ _).mpr (cut_mono Q g.rightAnchor h) theorem shadow_meet (b c : B) : g.shadow (Q.meet b c) = P.meet (g.shadow b) (g.shadow c) := by unfold shadow rw [cut_meet, g.overlap.map_meet] rfl def data : Data P g.Fresh Unit where component _ := () base _ := g.leftAnchor upper _ _ := False upper_up := by intro _ _ _ h _; exact h upper_meet := by intro _ _ _ h _; exact h base_le_upper _ _ h := False.elim h base_not_upper _ h := h shadow x := g.shadow x.val shadow_le_base x := g.shadow_le_anchor x.val inside x y := Q.le x.val y.val inside_refl x := Q.refl x.val inside_trans := Q.trans inside_antisymm hxy hyx := Subtype.ext (Q.antisymm hxy hyx) inside_component _ := rfl inside_shadow := g.shadow_mono theorem component_meets : ComponentMeets g.data := by classical intro x y _ by_cases old : Q.le (Q.meet x.val y.val) g.rightAnchor · exact Or.inr (fun z hx hy => z.property (Q.trans (Q.le_meet hx hy) old)) · exact Or.inl ⟨⟨Q.meet x.val y.val, old⟩, Q.meet_le_left _ _, Q.meet_le_right _ _, fun _ hx hy => Q.le_meet hx hy, g.shadow_meet x.val y.val⟩ noncomputable def order : MeetOrder g.Node := meetOrder g.data g.component_meets noncomputable def left : MeetEmbedding P g.order := oldEmbedding g.data g.component_meets noncomputable def represent (b : B) : g.Node := by classical exact if h : Q.le b g.rightAnchor then .inl (g.overlap.toFun ⟨b, h⟩).val else .inr ⟨b, h⟩ theorem represent_old (b : B) (h : Q.le b g.rightAnchor) : g.represent b = .inl (g.overlap.toFun ⟨b, h⟩).val := by unfold represent exact dite_eq_left h theorem represent_new (b : B) (h : ¬ Q.le b g.rightAnchor) : g.represent b = .inr ⟨b, h⟩ := by unfold represent exact dite_eq_right h theorem represent_le_iff (b c : B) : g.order.le (g.represent b) (g.represent c) ↔ Q.le b c := by classical by_cases hb : Q.le b g.rightAnchor · rw [g.represent_old b hb] by_cases hc : Q.le c g.rightAnchor · rw [g.represent_old c hc] exact g.overlap.le_iff _ _ · rw [g.represent_new c hc] change P.le (g.overlap.toFun ⟨b, hb⟩).val (g.overlap.toFun (cut Q g.rightAnchor c)).val ↔ _ change (idealOrder P g.leftAnchor).le (g.overlap.toFun ⟨b, hb⟩) (g.overlap.toFun (cut Q g.rightAnchor c)) ↔ _ rw [g.overlap.le_iff] exact ⟨fun h => Q.trans h (Q.meet_le_left _ _), fun h => Q.le_meet h hb⟩ · rw [g.represent_new b hb] by_cases hc : Q.le c g.rightAnchor · rw [g.represent_old c hc] exact ⟨False.elim, fun h => hb (Q.trans h hc)⟩ · rw [g.represent_new c hc] exact ⟨fun h => h.elim id False.elim, Or.inl⟩ theorem old_below_represent (a : A) (b : B) : g.order.le (.inl a) (g.represent b) ↔ P.le a (g.shadow b) := by classical by_cases h : Q.le b g.rightAnchor · rw [g.represent_old b h] unfold shadow rw [cut_of_le Q g.rightAnchor b h] exact Iff.rfl · rw [g.represent_new b h] exact Iff.rfl theorem represented_meet (b c : B) : IsMeet g.data (g.represent b) (g.represent c) (g.represent (Q.meet b c)) := by refine ⟨(g.represent_le_iff _ _).mpr (Q.meet_le_left _ _), (g.represent_le_iff _ _).mpr (Q.meet_le_right _ _), ?_⟩ intro x hx hy cases x with | inl a => apply (g.old_below_represent a _).mpr rw [g.shadow_meet] exact P.le_meet ((g.old_below_represent a b).mp hx) ((g.old_below_represent a c).mp hy) | inr x => have represented : g.represent x.val = Sum.inr x := g.represent_new x.val x.property rw [← represented] at hx hy ⊢ exact (g.represent_le_iff _ _).mpr (Q.le_meet ((g.represent_le_iff _ _).mp hx) ((g.represent_le_iff _ _).mp hy)) noncomputable def right : MeetEmbedding Q g.order where toFun := g.represent le_iff := g.represent_le_iff map_meet b c := (meet_eq g.data g.component_meets (g.represented_meet b c)).symm theorem cover (x : g.Node) : (∃ a, g.left.toFun a = x) ∨ (∃ b, g.right.toFun b = x) := by cases x with | inl a => exact Or.inl ⟨a, rfl⟩ | inr b => exact Or.inr ⟨b.val, g.represent_new b.val b.property⟩ theorem left_ideal (a : A) (x : g.Node) (h : g.order.le x (g.left.toFun a)) : ∃ b, g.left.toFun b = x := by cases x with | inl b => exact ⟨b, rfl⟩ | inr x => exact False.elim h theorem overlap_exact (a : A) (b : B) : g.right.toFun b = g.left.toFun a ↔ ∃ h : Q.le b g.rightAnchor, (g.overlap.toFun ⟨b, h⟩).val = a := by classical change g.represent b = Sum.inl a ↔ _ by_cases h : Q.le b g.rightAnchor · rw [g.represent_old b h] constructor · intro eq exact ⟨h, Sum.inl.inj eq⟩ · rintro ⟨_, eq⟩ exact congrArg Sum.inl eq · rw [g.represent_new b h] exact ⟨(fun eq => by cases eq), fun ⟨hb, _⟩ => False.elim (h hb)⟩ theorem old_in_right (a : A) : (∃ b, g.right.toFun b = g.left.toFun a) ↔ P.le a g.leftAnchor := by constructor · rintro ⟨b, eq⟩ rcases (g.overlap_exact a b).mp eq with ⟨hb, val⟩ exact val ▸ (g.overlap.toFun ⟨b, hb⟩).property · intro ha let b := g.overlap.inverse ⟨a, ha⟩ refine ⟨b.val, (g.overlap_exact a b.val).mpr ⟨b.property, ?_⟩⟩ exact congrArg Subtype.val (g.overlap.right_inverse ⟨a, ha⟩) theorem right_ideal (b : B) (x : g.Node) (h : g.order.le x (g.right.toFun b)) : ∃ c, g.right.toFun c = x := by cases x with | inl a => apply (g.old_in_right a).mpr exact P.trans ((g.old_below_represent a b).mp h) (g.shadow_le_anchor b) | inr x => exact ⟨x.val, g.represent_new x.val x.property⟩ theorem cross_meet (a : A) (b : B) : g.order.meet (g.left.toFun a) (g.right.toFun b) = .inl (P.meet a (g.shadow b)) := by apply meet_eq g.data g.component_meets refine ⟨P.meet_le_left _ _, (g.old_below_represent _ b).mpr (P.meet_le_right _ _), ?_⟩ intro x hx hy rcases g.left_ideal a x hx with ⟨c, rfl⟩ exact P.le_meet hx ((g.old_below_represent c b).mp hy) theorem new_shadow_meet (b : g.Fresh) (a : A) : g.order.meet (.inr b) (.inl a) = .inl (P.meet (g.shadow b.val) a) := meet_eq g.data g.component_meets (Attachment.shadow_meet g.data b a (fun h => h)) theorem principal_cross_meet (a : A) (b : B) : g.order.meet (g.left.toFun a) (g.right.toFun b) = g.left.toFun (P.meet (P.meet a g.leftAnchor) (g.shadow b)) := by rw [g.cross_meet] apply congrArg Sum.inl apply P.antisymm · exact P.le_meet (P.le_meet (P.meet_le_left _ _) (P.trans (P.meet_le_right _ _) (g.shadow_le_anchor b))) (P.meet_le_right _ _) · exact P.le_meet (P.trans (P.meet_le_left _ _) (P.meet_le_left _ _)) (P.meet_le_right _ _) theorem greatest_old_part (b : B) : ∀ a, g.order.le (g.left.toFun a) (g.right.toFun b) ↔ P.le a (g.shadow b) := fun a => g.old_below_represent a b theorem left_principal (top : A) (greatest : ∀ a, P.le a top) (x : g.Node) : g.order.le x (g.left.toFun top) ↔ ∃ a, g.left.toFun a = x := by constructor · exact g.left_ideal top x · rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩ exact (g.left.le_iff _ _).mpr (greatest a) theorem right_principal (top : B) (greatest : ∀ b, Q.le b top) (x : g.Node) : g.order.le x (g.right.toFun top) ↔ ∃ b, g.right.toFun b = x := by constructor · exact g.right_ideal top x · rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩ exact (g.right.le_iff _ _).mpr (greatest b) theorem least_preserved (zero : A) (least : ∀ a, P.le zero a) : ∀ x, g.order.le (g.left.toFun zero) x := by intro x cases x with | inl a => exact least a | inr b => exact least (g.shadow b.val) theorem bottoms_agree (zeroA : A) (zeroB : B) (leastA : ∀ a, P.le zeroA a) (leastB : ∀ b, Q.le zeroB b) : g.right.toFun zeroB = g.left.toFun zeroA := by have lower := g.least_preserved zeroA leastA (g.right.toFun zeroB) rcases g.right_ideal zeroB (g.left.toFun zeroA) lower with ⟨b, eq⟩ apply g.order.antisymm · rw [← eq] exact (g.right.le_iff _ _).mpr (leastB b) · exact lower theorem comparison_in_vertex (x y : g.Node) (lower : g.order.le x y) : (∃ a b, g.left.toFun a = x ∧ g.left.toFun b = y ∧ P.le a b) ∨ (∃ a b, g.right.toFun a = x ∧ g.right.toFun b = y ∧ Q.le a b) := by rcases g.cover y with ⟨b, rfl⟩ | ⟨b, rfl⟩ · rcases g.left_ideal b x lower with ⟨a, rfl⟩ exact Or.inl ⟨a, b, rfl, rfl, (g.left.le_iff _ _).mp lower⟩ · rcases g.right_ideal b x lower with ⟨a, rfl⟩ exact Or.inr ⟨a, b, rfl, rfl, (g.right.le_iff _ _).mp lower⟩ end Input end PartitionPilot.Compression.RecursiveMaps.PrincipalAmalgamation namespace PartitionPilot.Compression.RecursiveMaps.BinaryTiles open Attachment PrincipalAmalgamation universe u variable {A : Type u} (P : MeetOrder A) noncomputable def vertex (g : Input P P) : Bool → MeetEmbedding P g.order | false => g.left | true => g.right theorem vertex_cover (g : Input P P) (x : g.Node) : ∃ i y, (vertex P g i).toFun y = x := by rcases g.cover x with ⟨y, eq⟩ | ⟨y, eq⟩ · exact ⟨false, y, eq⟩ · exact ⟨true, y, eq⟩ def separation (W : A) : Input P P where leftAnchor := W rightAnchor := W overlap := { toFun := id le_iff := fun _ _ => Iff.rfl map_meet := fun _ _ => rfl inverse := id left_inverse := fun _ => rfl right_inverse := fun _ => rfl } theorem separation_fixes (W x : A) (below : P.le x W) : (separation P W).right.toFun x = (separation P W).left.toFun x := (separation P W).represent_old x below theorem separation_intersection (W x : A) : (∃ y, (separation P W).right.toFun y = (separation P W).left.toFun x) ↔ P.le x W := (separation P W).old_in_right x theorem separation_cross_meet (W D X : A) (belowD : P.le W D) (belowX : P.le W X) : (separation P W).order.meet ((separation P W).right.toFun D) ((separation P W).left.toFun X) = (separation P W).left.toFun W := by rw [meet_comm, (separation P W).cross_meet] change Sum.inl (P.meet X (P.meet D W)) = Sum.inl W have dw : P.meet D W = W := P.antisymm (P.meet_le_right _ _) (P.le_meet belowD (P.refl W)) have xw : P.meet X W = W := P.antisymm (P.meet_le_right _ _) (P.le_meet belowX (P.refl W)) rw [dw, xw] def compression (T K : A) (top : ∀ x, P.le x T) (S : MeetIso P (idealOrder P K)) : Input P P where leftAnchor := K rightAnchor := T overlap := { toFun := fun x => S.toFun x.val le_iff := fun x y => S.le_iff x.val y.val map_meet := fun x y => S.map_meet x.val y.val inverse := fun y => ⟨S.inverse y, top _⟩ left_inverse := fun x => Subtype.ext (S.left_inverse x.val) right_inverse := fun y => S.right_inverse y } theorem compression_identification (T K : A) (top : ∀ x, P.le x T) (S : MeetIso P (idealOrder P K)) (x : A) : (compression P T K top S).right.toFun x = (compression P T K top S).left.toFun (S.toFun x).val := (compression P T K top S).represent_old x (top x) theorem compression_no_new_nodes (T K : A) (top : ∀ x, P.le x T) (S : MeetIso P (idealOrder P K)) (x : (compression P T K top S).Node) : ∃ a, (compression P T K top S).left.toFun a = x := by cases x with | inl a => exact ⟨a, rfl⟩ | inr b => exact False.elim (b.property (top b.val)) theorem compression_top (T K : A) (top : ∀ x, P.le x T) (S : MeetIso P (idealOrder P K)) : (compression P T K top S).right.toFun T = (compression P T K top S).left.toFun K := by rw [compression_identification] apply congrArg (compression P T K top S).left.toFun apply P.antisymm (S.toFun T).property have bound := (S.le_iff (S.inverse ⟨K, P.refl K⟩) T).mpr (top _) rw [S.right_inverse] at bound exact bound end PartitionPilot.Compression.RecursiveMaps.BinaryTiles end end OAI