Datasets:
Tasks:
Text Classification
Modalities:
Text
Formats:
parquet
Languages:
English
Size:
10K - 100K
License:
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -107,4 +107,26 @@ TODO: Add repos
|
|
| 107 |
The Data Collection and Preprocessing for this Hugging Face dataset involved two main steps.
|
| 108 |
First, GitHub repositories known for high code quality were downloaded and labeled as highly readable. The extracted methods are labeled with a score of 4.5.
|
| 109 |
Second, the code was intentionally manipulated to reduce readability. The resulting code was labelled with a score of 1.5.
|
| 110 |
-
This resulted in an automatically generated training dataset for source code readability classification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 107 |
The Data Collection and Preprocessing for this Hugging Face dataset involved two main steps.
|
| 108 |
First, GitHub repositories known for high code quality were downloaded and labeled as highly readable. The extracted methods are labeled with a score of 4.5.
|
| 109 |
Second, the code was intentionally manipulated to reduce readability. The resulting code was labelled with a score of 1.5.
|
| 110 |
+
This resulted in an automatically generated training dataset for source code readability classification.
|
| 111 |
+
|
| 112 |
+
#### Who are the source data producers?
|
| 113 |
+
|
| 114 |
+
The source data producers are the people that wrote the used open source Java projects.
|
| 115 |
+
|
| 116 |
+
#### Personal and Sensitive Information
|
| 117 |
+
|
| 118 |
+
The ratings of the code snippets are automatically assigned. Thus, no personal or sensitive information is contained in this dataset.
|
| 119 |
+
|
| 120 |
+
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 121 |
+
|
| 122 |
+
The assigned labels are not accurate, as they are only an estimation.
|
| 123 |
+
|
| 124 |
+
### Recommendations
|
| 125 |
+
|
| 126 |
+
The dataset should be used to train Java code readability classifiers. We recommend fine-tuning and evaluation on manually labelled data.
|
| 127 |
+
|
| 128 |
+
## Dataset Card Authors
|
| 129 |
+
Lukas Krodinger, [Chair of Software Engineering II](https://www.fim.uni-passau.de/en/chair-for-software-engineering-ii), [University of Passau](https://www.uni-passau.de/en/).
|
| 130 |
+
|
| 131 |
+
## Dataset Card Contact
|
| 132 |
+
Feel free to contact me via [E-Mail](mailto:krodin03@ads.uni-passau.de) if you have any questions or remarks.
|