siddharthmb commited on
Commit
472f7ab
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 3a0c163

Card: document which estimator produces the published belief-F1 column

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +9 -0
README.md CHANGED
@@ -51,6 +51,15 @@ Key columns: `experiment_name` (append-safe grouping), `cell_id`, `arm`, `deadli
51
  `instance_id`, `seed`, `deal_rate`, `normalized_primary` (realized normalized utilitarian welfare over the
52
  instance's feasible ceiling; a no-deal scores 0), `rounds_to_agreement`, `belief_auc_accept_set_f1`.
53
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
54
  ## Experiment-name mapping
55
 
56
  | experiment_name | description |
 
51
  `instance_id`, `seed`, `deal_rate`, `normalized_primary` (realized normalized utilitarian welfare over the
52
  instance's feasible ceiling; a no-deal scores 0), `rounds_to_agreement`, `belief_auc_accept_set_f1`.
53
 
54
+ ### Reproducing the headline belief-accuracy numbers
55
+
56
+ The belief-F1 figures quoted in research note 0061 (0.210 / 0.228 / 0.241 / 0.244 / 0.241 across r4-r64) are
57
+ **`cells.csv.belief_auc_accept_set_f1`** — a per-episode time-average, then aggregated across episodes.
58
+ Taking a flat mean of the `accept_set_f1` column in `belief_turns.csv.gz` instead gives
59
+ 0.207 / 0.225 / 0.239 / 0.243 / 0.240, about 0.003 lower at every deadline, because that weights turns
60
+ equally rather than episodes and so over-weights long episodes. Both are defensible summaries of the same
61
+ data and the saturation conclusion is identical under either; use `cells.csv` to match the published table.
62
+
63
  ## Experiment-name mapping
64
 
65
  | experiment_name | description |