Datasets:
Create readme.md
Browse files
readme.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# Hindi (Devanagari) Text Rendering — Pilot Dataset
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
Synthetic image/text pairs for training a diffusion model to render **Hindi text
|
| 4 |
+
in Devanagari script**. 4,000 samples at 512x512, with typographically correct
|
| 5 |
+
shaping, exact ground-truth transcriptions, and per-sample glyph masks.
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+
Built as a feasibility pilot for a Stable Diffusion 1.5 LoRA. Sized to answer one
|
| 8 |
+
question cheaply — *can the model learn Devanagari glyph shapes at all?* — rather
|
| 9 |
+
than to train a production model.
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
---
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
## Why this exists
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
Most text-rendering datasets are Latin-only, and most Devanagari datasets are
|
| 16 |
+
built for **recognition** (OCR), not **generation**. Those are not
|
| 17 |
+
interchangeable: recognition sets are deliberately adversarial — blurred,
|
| 18 |
+
occluded, low-resolution — and a generative model trained on them learns to
|
| 19 |
+
produce blurry, occluded text.
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
This dataset is the opposite: clean, sharp, and constrained so that every sample
|
| 22 |
+
is something a generator should aim to reproduce.
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
## What makes Devanagari hard
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
- **Shirorekha** — a continuous horizontal bar joins letters across a word.
|
| 27 |
+
Models trained on Latin produce broken or wavy bars.
|
| 28 |
+
- **Conjuncts** — क् + ष → क्ष. Hundreds of ligatures whose shapes are not
|
| 29 |
+
compositional from their parts.
|
| 30 |
+
- **Reordering** — the matra ि is written *before* the consonant it follows
|
| 31 |
+
logically.
|
| 32 |
+
- **Three vertical zones** — matras sit above and below the base line, so glyph
|
| 33 |
+
extent is far taller than Latin.
|
| 34 |
+
- **Fine diacritics** — nukta ़, anusvara ं, chandrabindu ँ are 2–8 pixel
|
| 35 |
+
features that vanish under aggressive downsampling.
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
## Contents
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
```
|
| 40 |
+
data/pilot/
|
| 41 |
+
images/ 4,000 x 512x512 JPEG (quality 95)
|
| 42 |
+
masks/ 4,000 x 512x512 PNG, 8-bit glyph coverage masks
|
| 43 |
+
metadata.jsonl one record per sample
|
| 44 |
+
train_words.txt 72 words used in the images
|
| 45 |
+
holdout_words.txt 20 words deliberately NOT rendered
|
| 46 |
+
fonts/ 22 OFL Devanagari fonts
|
| 47 |
+
corpus/ larger word lists (see Provenance)
|
| 48 |
+
src/ the generator, so results are reproducible
|
| 49 |
+
```
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
### `metadata.jsonl` schema
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
| field | type | meaning |
|
| 54 |
+
|---|---|---|
|
| 55 |
+
| `file` | str | path relative to `data/pilot/` |
|
| 56 |
+
| `text` | str | the Hindi string rendered — exact ground truth |
|
| 57 |
+
| `caption` | str | training caption (varied template) |
|
| 58 |
+
| `tokens` | int | CLIP token count of the caption, template included |
|
| 59 |
+
| `font` | str | filename in `fonts/` |
|
| 60 |
+
| `em` | int | font em size in pixels |
|
| 61 |
+
| `x`, `y` | int | top-left of the text box |
|
| 62 |
+
| `w`, `h` | int | text box size in pixels |
|
| 63 |
+
| `glyphs` | int | shaped glyph count (≠ character count, due to ligatures) |
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
```json
|
| 66 |
+
{"file": "images/000000.jpg", "text": "रुकें",
|
| 67 |
+
"caption": "Hindi text \"रुकें\" on a board, flat design", "tokens": 18,
|
| 68 |
+
"font": "Khand-Regular.ttf", "em": 40, "x": 150, "y": 405,
|
| 69 |
+
"w": 62, "h": 48, "glyphs": 3}
|
| 70 |
+
```
|
| 71 |
+
|
| 72 |
+
## Statistics
|
| 73 |
+
|
| 74 |
+
| | |
|
| 75 |
+
|---|---|
|
| 76 |
+
| samples | 4,000 |
|
| 77 |
+
| resolution | 512 x 512 |
|
| 78 |
+
| unique words | 72 train (+20 held out, never rendered) |
|
| 79 |
+
| fonts | 22, evenly sampled (156–211 samples each) |
|
| 80 |
+
| font em size | 32–120 px, mean 75.5 |
|
| 81 |
+
| text box | 44–454 px wide, 30–161 px tall |
|
| 82 |
+
| caption tokens | 11–29 of CLIP's 77 |
|
| 83 |
+
| glyphs per sample | 2–8 |
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
Word vocabulary spans four groups: simple no-conjunct words, real signage
|
| 86 |
+
vocabulary, conjunct-bearing words (क्ष ज्ञ त्र श्र द्व ह्म …), and diacritic
|
| 87 |
+
stress cases (nukta, anusvara, chandrabindu, visarga).
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
## How it was generated
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
1. **Shaping** — text is shaped with **HarfBuzz** (`uharfbuzz`) and rasterised
|
| 92 |
+
per-glyph with **FreeType** (`freetype-py`).
|
| 93 |
+
|
| 94 |
+
> This matters more than it sounds. Pillow's published wheels ship **without
|
| 95 |
+
> Raqm**, so `ImageDraw.text()` renders Devanagari *unshaped*: conjuncts break
|
| 96 |
+
> into separate letters and pre-base ि lands on the wrong side of its
|
| 97 |
+
> consonant. The output looks plausible to a non-reader while being wrong.
|
| 98 |
+
> Any dataset built that way teaches a model incorrect letterforms.
|
| 99 |
+
|
| 100 |
+
Verified: क्ष / त्र / ज्ञ each collapse 3 codepoints → 1 glyph; ि reorders
|
| 101 |
+
ahead of its consonant; स्त्री → 2 glyphs.
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
+
2. **Composition** — flat, gradient, or lightly textured backgrounds; randomised
|
| 104 |
+
font, size, position and colour, with foreground/background luminance
|
| 105 |
+
contrast **enforced** (≥ 0.35), not sampled and hoped for.
|
| 106 |
+
|
| 107 |
+
3. **Captions** — 10 templates × 12 surface nouns, with the quoted Hindi string
|
| 108 |
+
as the single invariant anchor. The phrase "Hindi text" is dropped in ~20% of
|
| 109 |
+
samples so a model does not become dependent on a trigger phrase.
|
| 110 |
+
|
| 111 |
+
## The 32px rule
|
| 112 |
+
|
| 113 |
+
**Every sample renders text at font em size ≥ 32px, asserted at generation
|
| 114 |
+
time.** This is not a stylistic choice. Stable Diffusion 1.5's 4-channel VAE
|
| 115 |
+
downsamples 8×, and measured round-trips show Devanagari diacritics are
|
| 116 |
+
destroyed below ~24px em and clean at 32px:
|
| 117 |
+
|
| 118 |
+
| font em size | VAE reconstruction |
|
| 119 |
+
|---|---|
|
| 120 |
+
| 12–20 px | destroyed — nuktas gone, conjuncts illegible |
|
| 121 |
+
| 24 px | marginal — nukta merges into the stroke |
|
| 122 |
+
| **32 px** | **clean — minimum safe size** |
|
| 123 |
+
| 48–64 px | near-perfect |
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
+
Note this is **em size**, not ink-box height: measured ink/em ratio varies
|
| 126 |
+
0.67–1.08 depending on which matras a word carries, so ink height is
|
| 127 |
+
content-dependent and unsuitable as a threshold.
|
| 128 |
+
|
| 129 |
+
Consequence: this dataset covers **headline- and signage-sized text**, roughly
|
| 130 |
+
1–4 words. It is not suitable for training small or body-sized text rendering on
|
| 131 |
+
a 4-channel VAE at 512px — that is a reconstruction limit no training run can
|
| 132 |
+
overcome.
|
| 133 |
+
|
| 134 |
+
## Intended use
|
| 135 |
+
|
| 136 |
+
- Training / fine-tuning diffusion models (LoRA or full) for Devanagari text
|
| 137 |
+
- Evaluating text-rendering quality, with exact transcriptions as ground truth
|
| 138 |
+
- Glyph-conditioned approaches (ControlNet, GlyphControl, AnyText) — masks are
|
| 139 |
+
included for this
|
| 140 |
+
- The 20 held-out words test generalisation rather than memorisation
|
| 141 |
+
|
| 142 |
+
**Not suitable for:** OCR / scene-text recognition training (these are clean
|
| 143 |
+
synthetic renders, not photographs), or small-text rendering (see above).
|
| 144 |
+
|
| 145 |
+
## Limitations
|
| 146 |
+
|
| 147 |
+
- **Synthetic only.** No photographic backgrounds, perspective, occlusion or
|
| 148 |
+
real-world lighting. A model trained solely on this will render clean text but
|
| 149 |
+
may not composite convincingly into photographs.
|
| 150 |
+
- **Small vocabulary.** 72 words is a pilot scale, chosen to make the
|
| 151 |
+
feasibility question cheap to answer. It is far too small to teach the script
|
| 152 |
+
broadly.
|
| 153 |
+
- **Conjunct coverage is partial.** श्च has zero coverage in the rendered
|
| 154 |
+
samples; a larger stratified corpus is included separately.
|
| 155 |
+
- **One script, one language.** Devanagari as used for Hindi. Marathi and Nepali
|
| 156 |
+
share the script with minor differences and are not specifically covered.
|
| 157 |
+
|
| 158 |
+
## Provenance and licensing
|
| 159 |
+
|
| 160 |
+
Three components with different origins — worth separating:
|
| 161 |
+
|
| 162 |
+
1. **Images and masks** — generated by the included code from a hand-written word
|
| 163 |
+
list (`corpus/pilot_words.txt`) using OFL fonts. No third-party data.
|
| 164 |
+
Released under **CC BY 4.0**.
|
| 165 |
+
|
| 166 |
+
2. **Fonts** (`fonts/`) — 22 families from Google Fonts, all under the **SIL Open
|
| 167 |
+
Font License 1.1**, which permits embedding and redistribution. Includes Noto
|
| 168 |
+
Sans/Serif Devanagari, Mukta, Hind, Halant, Tiro Devanagari Hindi, Baloo 2,
|
| 169 |
+
Kalam, Khand, Martel, Modak, Palanquin, Rozha One, Sahitya, Teko, Yatra One,
|
| 170 |
+
Amita, Biryani, Poppins. All audited for full Devanagari coverage and genuine
|
| 171 |
+
conjunct formation.
|
| 172 |
+
|
| 173 |
+
3. **`corpus/corpus.json`** — the larger 4,569-word stratified vocabulary is
|
| 174 |
+
**derived from transcriptions in IIIT-IndicSTR-Word** (words only; no images
|
| 175 |
+
from that dataset are included or redistributed here).
|
| 176 |
+
|
| 177 |
+
|
| 178 |
+
If you use the corpus component, cite the source dataset:
|
| 179 |
+
|
| 180 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 181 |
+
@inproceedings{mondal2024indic,
|
| 182 |
+
title={Indic Scene Text on the Roadside},
|
| 183 |
+
author={Mondal, Ajoy and Tulsyan, Krishna and Jawahar, CV},
|
| 184 |
+
booktitle={International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition},
|
| 185 |
+
pages={263--278}, year={2024}, organization={Springer}
|
| 186 |
+
}
|
| 187 |
+
```
|
| 188 |
+
|
| 189 |
+
## Reproducing
|
| 190 |
+
|
| 191 |
+
```bash
|
| 192 |
+
python src/diag/font_audit.py # verify fonts
|
| 193 |
+
python src/data/gen_pilot.py --n 4000 --masks --seed 42
|
| 194 |
+
python src/diag/verify_shaping.py # confirm shaping is active
|
| 195 |
+
```
|
| 196 |
+
|
| 197 |
+
`PLAN.md` and `FINDINGS.md` document the full approach and every measurement
|
| 198 |
+
quoted above.
|