ICLR 2018 Workshop Acceptance Decision

Congratulations, your paper was accepted to the ICLR workshop.

How your identity will be displayed with the above content.

The users who will be allowed to read the above content.

(optional) Comment on this decision.


ICLR 2018 Workshop Acceptance Decision

Based on the reviews, this paper has not been accepted for presentation at the ICLR workshop. However, the conversation and updates can continue to appear here on OpenReview.

(optional) Comment on this decision.


ICLR 2018 Workshop Acceptance Decision

This paper does not follow the formatting guidelines in https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2018/CallForWorkshops and is, thus, rejected.

(optional) Comment on this decision.


ICLR 2018 Workshop Acceptance Decision

(optional) Comment on this decision.


ICLR 2018 Workshop Acceptance Decision

Congratulations, your paper was accepted to the ICLR workshop. While this work hasn't tried a new algorithm yet, the preliminary findings will make a really interesting poster.

(optional) Comment on this decision.


ICLR 2018 Workshop Acceptance Decision

This paper was invited to the workshop track based on reviews at the main conference.

(optional) Comment on this decision.


ICLR 2018 Workshop Acceptance Decision

This paper has not been accepted for presentation at the ICLR workshop. While the full version of the paper is interesting, out of fairness we can only consider the 3 page versions, which for this submission was not clear enough. However, the conversation and updates can continue to appear here on OpenReview.

(optional) Comment on this decision.


ICLR 2018 Workshop Acceptance Decision

Based on the reviews, this paper has not been accepted for presentation at the ICLR workshop. However, the conversation and updates can continue to appear here on OpenReview. As discussed by one of the reviewers, when encouraging ICLR to study applications such as EEG more, it is important to introduce good experimental practice.

(optional) Comment on this decision.


ICLR 2018 Workshop Acceptance Decision

Congratulations, your paper was accepted to the ICLR workshop. Given the concerns of reviewer 3, you may wish to soften the claims of generality, or the extent to which the measure can be compared between model classes.

(optional) Comment on this decision.


ICLR 2018 Workshop Acceptance Decision

Based on the reviews, this paper has not been accepted for presentation at the ICLR workshop. The results were too small scale and quite preliminary, even for the workshop. However, the conversation and updates can continue to appear here on OpenReview, and we look further for improvements!

(optional) Comment on this decision.


ICLR 2018 Workshop Acceptance Decision

This paper does not follow the formatting guidelines in https://iclr.cc/Conferences/2018/CallForWorkshops and is, thus, rejected. In particular, the authors altered the margins to fit in 3 pages.

(optional) Comment on this decision.


ICLR 2018 Workshop Acceptance Decision

Based on the reviews, this paper has not been accepted for presentation at the ICLR workshop. However, the conversation and updates can continue to appear here on OpenReview. As discussed by the reviewers, when encouraging ICLR to study applications such as EEG more, it is important to introduce good experimental practice.

(optional) Comment on this decision.