rejected
listlengths 2
2
| chosen
listlengths 2
2
| chosen_score
int64 7
209
| rejected_score
int64 2
50
| chosen_rewards
listlengths 19
19
| rejected_rewards
listlengths 19
19
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"content": "If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "And when your teacher doesn't listen or pay attention to your presentation even you do not go over time limit? I did experienced that a week ago with my group and I still feel frustrated. We were the only group that he didn't pay attention at all. We put so much effort in that presentation! I felt very useless and depressed when I noticed that he didn't have the effort to listen us.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "I'm pretty strict on time, to the point where I'll cut off the presentation if it goes over the alloted time (typically, I'll also give them a warning when they're halfway through their time and another when a minute is left). Getting your point accross concisely is a valuable skill and important to master in a business environment. In a similar vein, I put a max word/page count on assignments instead of a minimum. Students often seem surprised at that.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 17
| 5
|
[
0.310546875,
0.314453125,
0.291015625,
0.29296875,
1.5859375,
0.10693359375,
0.1484375,
-0.4375,
-0.74609375,
0.65625,
1.125,
-0.8984375,
-0.01806640625,
1.265625,
-0.29296875,
-0.1474609375,
0.03515625,
0.1630859375,
-0.1240234375
] |
[
0.296875,
0.298828125,
0.287109375,
0.322265625,
1.59375,
0.099609375,
0.12255859375,
-0.4453125,
-0.7578125,
0.65625,
1.078125,
-0.953125,
-0.0245361328125,
1.2421875,
-0.29296875,
-0.146484375,
0.033203125,
0.1572265625,
-0.125
] |
[
{
"content": "If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "I feel really lucky that I didn't experience this in my program. It was geared towards practitioners so the time limit on presentations was a hard limit. If a policy maker wouldn't sit through it because it was too long the faculty member would cut it off.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "I did a poster presentation where the time limer was 5 mins, including questions. I presented within the time limits, but no one else in my group did. The « winner » was a student that went 5 minutes over time. It sucked because I could have done a lot better with that 5 extra minutes too...",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 7
| 2
|
[
0.30078125,
0.3046875,
0.291015625,
0.3046875,
1.5859375,
0.1025390625,
0.1328125,
-0.44140625,
-0.75390625,
0.66015625,
1.0859375,
-0.921875,
-0.01416015625,
1.265625,
-0.29296875,
-0.1484375,
0.033935546875,
0.1611328125,
-0.123046875
] |
[
0.298828125,
0.302734375,
0.2890625,
0.322265625,
1.59375,
0.10009765625,
0.125,
-0.44140625,
-0.7578125,
0.66015625,
1.0703125,
-0.95703125,
-0.0234375,
1.25,
-0.29296875,
-0.1474609375,
0.03271484375,
0.158203125,
-0.12353515625
] |
[
{
"content": "If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Absolutely, meeting a time limit is a skill that need to be practiced. I am in math and my supervisor is fond of quoting (well, paraphrasing) Pascal saying \"I have made this letter longer than usual because I have not had time to make it shorter\".",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "If any professor is reading this: please do not praise students keeping their presentations much longer than you said it should be because it covers more. It is unfair and an obvious sign of obliviousness. It is nonsense. Please. If you tell your students to keep their presentations at a certain length, do not praise the ones who go above the set time limit by half an hour and praise their work for its depth. This has happened to me second time now. My professor asks me to cover one of the most controversial and comprehensive subjects in social sciences in 10 minutes and rolls their eyes for it not having elaborated enough in certain aspects while praising the 40-minute-though-supposed-to-be-10-minute presentation of my classmate for covering more on the same subject. If there are any professors reading this; please don't do this. Some students put a lot of work into making the damn presentation as concise as possible and literally rehearse a few times so that they do not go over the time limit. Covering more by going waaaay above the limit you yourself set is not something to be encouraged. Nor is it fair.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "I did a poster presentation where the time limer was 5 mins, including questions. I presented within the time limits, but no one else in my group did. The « winner » was a student that went 5 minutes over time. It sucked because I could have done a lot better with that 5 extra minutes too...",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 7
| 2
|
[
0.30078125,
0.3046875,
0.291015625,
0.3046875,
1.5859375,
0.1025390625,
0.1328125,
-0.44140625,
-0.75390625,
0.66015625,
1.0859375,
-0.921875,
-0.01416015625,
1.265625,
-0.29296875,
-0.1484375,
0.033935546875,
0.1611328125,
-0.123046875
] |
[
0.310546875,
0.318359375,
0.291015625,
0.291015625,
1.5859375,
0.10009765625,
0.1455078125,
-0.44921875,
-0.75390625,
0.640625,
1.125,
-0.90234375,
-0.01025390625,
1.265625,
-0.294921875,
-0.146484375,
0.03466796875,
0.1640625,
-0.1279296875
] |
[
{
"content": "After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Those acknowledgements though😂😂😂",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Using WTF as a keyword surelly sets an impact factor over 9000",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 209
| 50
|
[
0.365234375,
0.365234375,
0.2890625,
0.2158203125,
1.5390625,
0.1103515625,
0.2265625,
-0.4296875,
-0.7265625,
0.6328125,
1.25,
-0.76171875,
0.01416015625,
1.3046875,
-0.302734375,
-0.1435546875,
0.041015625,
0.1728515625,
-0.1328125
] |
[
0.34375,
0.345703125,
0.29296875,
0.265625,
1.5703125,
0.103515625,
0.18359375,
-0.44140625,
-0.73046875,
0.640625,
1.1875,
-0.8515625,
-0.0014801025390625,
1.2890625,
-0.298828125,
-0.1455078125,
0.03662109375,
0.1689453125,
-0.1318359375
] |
[
{
"content": "After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Lmao I am dead",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Using WTF as a keyword surelly sets an impact factor over 9000",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 209
| 8
|
[
0.365234375,
0.365234375,
0.2890625,
0.2158203125,
1.5390625,
0.1103515625,
0.2265625,
-0.4296875,
-0.7265625,
0.6328125,
1.25,
-0.76171875,
0.01416015625,
1.3046875,
-0.302734375,
-0.1435546875,
0.041015625,
0.1728515625,
-0.1328125
] |
[
0.369140625,
0.37109375,
0.2890625,
0.216796875,
1.546875,
0.1083984375,
0.23046875,
-0.431640625,
-0.7109375,
0.6328125,
1.2734375,
-0.75390625,
0.0166015625,
1.3046875,
-0.302734375,
-0.1455078125,
0.04150390625,
0.17578125,
-0.1328125
] |
[
{
"content": "After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Don’t these journals ask for a hefty fee? Did the professor actually pay money to get this published?",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "“More research is warranted” has always been the biggest cop out.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 68
| 14
|
[
0.388671875,
0.390625,
0.2890625,
0.2001953125,
1.546875,
0.10498046875,
0.25,
-0.43359375,
-0.71484375,
0.6171875,
1.3359375,
-0.703125,
0.020751953125,
1.3203125,
-0.302734375,
-0.142578125,
0.04345703125,
0.1796875,
-0.1337890625
] |
[
0.38671875,
0.390625,
0.291015625,
0.201171875,
1.5390625,
0.107421875,
0.25,
-0.4375,
-0.71484375,
0.625,
1.3359375,
-0.71875,
0.0272216796875,
1.3203125,
-0.302734375,
-0.142578125,
0.0439453125,
0.1806640625,
-0.1337890625
] |
[
{
"content": "After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Lmao I am dead",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "After receiving an email from a sketchy journal soliciting submissions, a professor sent in a joke paper titled \"What's the Deal With Birds?\", which got published. Here's a small excerpt from the paper: > *Abstract:* Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted. > *Keywords*: birds, ornithology, behavior, phenotype, WTF, genomics, climate change You can read the PDf version of the original article here: https://irispublishers.com/sjrr/pdf/SJRR.MS.ID.000540.pdf Alternatively, there's a press summary of the situation here: https://gizmodo.com/sketchy-science-journal-publishes-article-titled-whats-1842924936",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "“More research is warranted” has always been the biggest cop out.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] | 68
| 8
|
[
0.38671875,
0.38671875,
0.28515625,
0.2080078125,
1.546875,
0.10107421875,
0.25,
-0.427734375,
-0.703125,
0.62109375,
1.359375,
-0.7109375,
0.0205078125,
1.3359375,
-0.302734375,
-0.14453125,
0.043212890625,
0.1806640625,
-0.1337890625
] |
[
0.38671875,
0.390625,
0.291015625,
0.21875,
1.5625,
0.10986328125,
0.2470703125,
-0.423828125,
-0.703125,
0.625,
1.3515625,
-0.72265625,
0.0267333984375,
1.3359375,
-0.298828125,
-0.1435546875,
0.044189453125,
0.1845703125,
-0.1328125
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.