Datasets:
Delete hf_README.md
Browse files- hf_README.md +0 -109
hf_README.md
DELETED
|
@@ -1,109 +0,0 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
---
|
| 2 |
-
dataset_info:
|
| 3 |
-
- config_name: release_v1
|
| 4 |
-
features:
|
| 5 |
-
- name: id
|
| 6 |
-
dtype: int64
|
| 7 |
-
- name: problem_id
|
| 8 |
-
dtype: string
|
| 9 |
-
- name: problem_desc
|
| 10 |
-
dtype: string
|
| 11 |
-
- name: time_limit_ms
|
| 12 |
-
dtype: int64
|
| 13 |
-
- name: memory_limit_MB
|
| 14 |
-
dtype: int64
|
| 15 |
-
- name: checker
|
| 16 |
-
dtype: string
|
| 17 |
-
- name: test_cases
|
| 18 |
-
list:
|
| 19 |
-
- name: input
|
| 20 |
-
dtype: string
|
| 21 |
-
- name: output
|
| 22 |
-
dtype: string
|
| 23 |
-
data_files:
|
| 24 |
-
- split: test
|
| 25 |
-
path: release_v1/test_50375e15.parquet
|
| 26 |
-
license: cc-by-4.0
|
| 27 |
-
language:
|
| 28 |
-
- en
|
| 29 |
-
tags:
|
| 30 |
-
- benchmark
|
| 31 |
-
- competitive-programming
|
| 32 |
-
task_categories:
|
| 33 |
-
- text-generation
|
| 34 |
-
---
|
| 35 |
-
# CF-Div2-Step Evaluation Benchmark
|
| 36 |
-
|
| 37 |
-
## Introduction
|
| 38 |
-
|
| 39 |
-
We introduce **CF-Div2-Stepfun**, a dataset curated to benchmark the competitive programming capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). We evaluate our proprietary **Step 3.5 Flash** ([visit website](https://static.stepfun.com/blog/step-3.5-flash/)) alongside several frontier models on this benchmark.
|
| 40 |
-
|
| 41 |
-
The benchmark comprises 53 problems sourced from official CodeForces Division 2 contests held between September 2024 and February 2025. We develop an offline evaluation framework that utilizes a local grading mechanism as an alternative to real-time online submissions.
|
| 42 |
-
|
| 43 |
-
The generated test cases consist of:
|
| 44 |
-
|
| 45 |
-
- Small-scale test cases, for initial functional verification.
|
| 46 |
-
- Randomized large-scale data, for performance and complexity verification.
|
| 47 |
-
- Handcrafted edge cases, derived from common error patterns and "hacked" submissions from real contest participants.
|
| 48 |
-
- Automated stress testing data, generated by stress testing technique, which keeps generating test cases until one can distinguish failed submissions from correct submissions.
|
| 49 |
-
|
| 50 |
-
To validate the reliability of this benchmark, we run both correct and representative failed submissions from the original contests. Our evaluator correctly identify 100% of the accepted submissions as "Passed," while 92.45% of the failed submissions are accurately flagged.
|
| 51 |
-
|
| 52 |
-
## Quickstart
|
| 53 |
-
|
| 54 |
-
```python
|
| 55 |
-
from datasets import load_dataset
|
| 56 |
-
|
| 57 |
-
dataset = load_dataset("stepfun-ai/CF-Div2-Stepfun", name="release_v1", split="test")
|
| 58 |
-
```
|
| 59 |
-
|
| 60 |
-
## Evaluation Details
|
| 61 |
-
|
| 62 |
-
The evaluation results are shown below.
|
| 63 |
-
|
| 64 |
-
| Model | C++ (avg@8) | Python (avg@8) | Java (avg@8) | C++(pass@8 rating) |
|
| 65 |
-
| Step 3.5 Flash | **86.1%** | **81.5%** | 77.1% | **2489** |
|
| 66 |
-
| Gemini 3.0 Pro | 83.5% | 74.1% | **81.6%** | 2397 |
|
| 67 |
-
| Deepseek V3.2 | 81.6% | 66.5% | 80.7% | 2319 |
|
| 68 |
-
| GLM-4.7 | 74.1% | 63.0% | 70.5% | 2156 |
|
| 69 |
-
| Claude Opus 4.5 | 72.2% | 68.4% | 68.9% | 2100 |
|
| 70 |
-
| Kimi K2-Thinking | 67.9% | 60.4% | 58.5% | 1976 |
|
| 71 |
-
| Minimax-M2.1 | 59.0% | 46.4% | 58.0% | 1869 |
|
| 72 |
-
| Mimo-V2 Flash | 46.9% | 43.6% | 39.6% | 1658 |
|
| 73 |
-
|
| 74 |
-
We use the following prompt for all model evaluations:
|
| 75 |
-
|
| 76 |
-
```
|
| 77 |
-
You are a coding expert. Given a competition-level coding problem, you need to write a {LANGUAGE} program to solve it. You may start by outlining your thought process. In the end, please provide the complete code in a code block enclosed with ``` ```.
|
| 78 |
-
{question}
|
| 79 |
-
```
|
| 80 |
-
|
| 81 |
-
The compilation and execution commands for C++, Python, Java are given below:
|
| 82 |
-
|
| 83 |
-
```
|
| 84 |
-
g++ -std=c++20 -fno-asm -fsanitize=bounds -fno-sanitize-recover=bounds –static -O2 -DONLINE_JUDGE -o code.exe code.cpp
|
| 85 |
-
./code.exe
|
| 86 |
-
```
|
| 87 |
-
|
| 88 |
-
```
|
| 89 |
-
python3 code.py
|
| 90 |
-
```
|
| 91 |
-
|
| 92 |
-
```
|
| 93 |
-
javac -J-Xmx544m {JAVA_CLASS_NAME}.java
|
| 94 |
-
java -XX:+UseSerialGC -Xmx544m -Xss64m -DONLINE_JUDGE {JAVA_CLASS_NAME}
|
| 95 |
-
```
|
| 96 |
-
|
| 97 |
-
For Python and Java evaluation, we use a double time limit.
|
| 98 |
-
|
| 99 |
-
The benchmark kits follow the [testlib](https://github.com/MikeMirzayanov/testlib) pipeline in validation and evaluation. There is a validator for each problem to check test case integrity, and a specific checker to verify output correctness.
|
| 100 |
-
|
| 101 |
-
The rating evaluation follows [CodeELO](https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.01257) methodology. For pass@8 metrics, we calculate the expected score with a fail-penalty but no time-penalty.
|
| 102 |
-
|
| 103 |
-
## License
|
| 104 |
-
|
| 105 |
-
We are releasing the benchmark under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY-4.0) license.
|
| 106 |
-
|
| 107 |
-
## Citation
|
| 108 |
-
|
| 109 |
-
If you find CF-Div2-Step useful, please consider citing it as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|