inputs stringlengths 368 3.77k | targets stringclasses 84 values | _template_idx int64 0 9 | _task_source stringclasses 1 value | _task_name stringclasses 2 values | _template_type stringclasses 2 values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
One example: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Solution is here: 1
Explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Now, solve this: Mwen te krashe lèt la.
(1)Lèt la te gen gou si.(2)Bouch mwen te sèk.
Solution: | 1 | 6 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
instruction:
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
question:
Mwen te gade pandil la.
(1)Mwen te tande pandil la ap fè tik-tok.(2)Mwen te vle verifye lè a.
answer:
2
question:
Msye rich la te mouri viyès.
(1)Pitit gason li te gen pwoblèm ak lalwa.(2)Pitit gason li te erite de fòtin li.
answer:
2
question:
Mwen te ranpli boutèy dlo mwen.
(1)Mwen te bwè tout dlo ladann.(2)Mwen te kenbe l nan frijidè a.
answer:
| 1
| 9 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
[EX Q]: Machin madanm nan te nan magazen an.
(1)Lisans li te revoke.(2)Li te nan yon aksidan machin.
[EX A]: 2
[EX Q]: Boutèy kola a te sifle.
(1)Mwen te vire boutey la.(2)Mwen te devise bouchon an.
[EX A]: 2
[EX Q]: Mizisyen lari a te atire yon foul.
(1)Moun te bay li monnen.(2)Li voye foul la ale.
[EX A]: | 1
| 6 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Nèj la t ap bloke ale a.
(1)Mwen fè yon boul ak nèj la.(2)Mwen te debarase nèj la.
2
Gwoup la te kite mize a.
(1)Yo te pran foto ekspoze yo.(2)Yo te gade tout ekspoze yo.
2
Pèsonaj la te sòti limouzin nan.
(1)Aparèy foto yo te tenyen nan direksyon li.(2)Fanmi li te asiste a konferans de près la.
| 1
| 0 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
--------
Question: Kesyè a te derefize madanm nan yon ranbousman pou wòb la.
(1)Li te pèdi resi a.(2)Wòb la pa te ale.
Answer: 1
Question: Zanmi mwen te tounen tèt li nan direksyon mwen.
(1)Mwen te rele non li.(2)Mwen te siyale li ak bra mwen.
Answer: 1
Question: Mwen te pouse pòt la.
(1)Pòt la louvri.(2)Pòt la femen.
Answer: | 1
| 7 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Q: Kle yo te disparèt nan posh pantalon mwen.
(1)Posh la te gen yon trou.(2)Pantalon yo te nèf.
A: 1
****
Q: Ti toutous la te sali tapi a.
(1)Mèt la te joure ti toutous la.(2)Mèt la te bay li yon sirèt.
A: 1
****
Q: Elèv la te bliye fè devwa li.
(1)Li pare yon eskiz pou bay metrès la.(2)Metrès fè li pase nan pwochen klas la.
A: | 1
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
One example is below.
Q: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
A: 1
Rationale: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Q: Mwen te pouse pòt la.
(1)Pòt la louvri.(2)Pòt la femen.
A: | 1 | 9 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
Teacher: In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Solution: 1
Reason: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Now, solve this instance: Gouvènman te oprime sitwayen li.
(1)Sitwayen te òganizeyon revòlt.(2)Sitwayen yo te anrejistre vòt yo.
Student: | 1 | 2 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
Part 1. Definition
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Part 2. Example
Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Answer: 1
Explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Part 3. Exercise
Msye a te gen menm kwayans ak paran li.
(1)Paran I te enfliyanse li.(2)Paran li te nye li.
Answer: | 1 | 7 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
[Q]: Flam bouji a te etenn.
(1)Mwen te soufle bouji a.(2)Mwen te limen mèch bouji a.
[A]: 1
[Q]: Ajan sikilasyon an te sifle timoun yo.
(1)Yo te prèt pou mache nan trafik la.(2)Li te rekonèt yo de katye li.
[A]: 1
[Q]: Gouvènman te oprime sitwayen li.
(1)Sitwayen te òganizeyon revòlt.(2)Sitwayen yo te anrejistre vòt yo.
[A]: | 1
| 5 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
[EX Q]: Mwen te pran antibyotik.
(1)Enfeksyon mwen te geri.(2)Enfeksyon mwen te gaye.
[EX A]: 1
[EX Q]: Mwen te prese sitwon an.
(1)Sitron an te vin mwazi.(2)Sitron an te jikle ji.
[EX A]: 2
[EX Q]: Msye a te gen menm kwayans ak paran li.
(1)Paran I te enfliyanse li.(2)Paran li te nye li.
[EX A]: | 1
| 6 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Solution: 1
Why? The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
New input: Paran yo te kouri nan chanm timoun yo.
(1)Timoun nan te reveye ak rèl fòt kochma li te fè a.(2)Timoun nan te pè gade sou kabann ni.
Solution: | 1 | 0 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
Teacher: In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Solution: 1
Reason: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Now, solve this instance: Fi a te fè enteresant devan zanmi li.
(1)Li te gen move nòt.(2)Li te ganye yon konpetisyon.
Student: | 2 | 2 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Let me give you an example: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
The answer to this example can be: 1
Here is why: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
OK. solve this:
Peyi a te dekouvè yon tè nouvèl.
(1)Peyi a te abandonnen tè a.(2)Peyi a te kolonize tè a.
Answer: | 2 | 8 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
See one example below:
Problem: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Solution: 1
Explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Problem: Men fi a te vin gen anpoul.
(1)Li te tape yon lèt.(2)Li te grenpe yon kod.
Solution: | 2 | 4 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Kanmarad yo te bay tò youn ak lòt.
(1)Yo te pèdi match yo.(2)Antrenè te anile antrènman an.
1
Atis la te melanje penti jòn nan penti ble.
(1)Penti te gaye toupatou.(2)Penti a te tounen vèt.
2
Men fi a te vin gen anpoul.
(1)Li te tape yon lèt.(2)Li te grenpe yon kod.
| 2
| 0 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Q: Kidnapè yo te lage otaj yo.
(1)Yo te aksepte lajan ranson an.(2)Yo te chape prizon.
A: 1
****
Q: Detektif yo te releve anprent yo sou lye yo.
(1)Yo te dekouvri idantite asasen an.(2)Yo te jwenn zam nan sou lye yo.
A: 1
****
Q: Lavabo a te bouche.
(1)Mwen louvri robinè a.(2)Mwen lage klowòks ladann.
A: | 2
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Solution: 1
Why? The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
New input: Sekretè a te mete korespondan an ann atant.
(1)Telefòn moun k'ap rele a te pèdi koneksyon.(2)Korespondan an te tann sou liy la.
Solution: | 2 | 0 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Example solution: 1
Example explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Problem: Je mwen te vin rouj e gonfle.
(1)Mwen t'ap kriye.(2)Mwen t'ap ri.
| Solution: 1 | 5 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Let me give you an example: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
The answer to this example can be: 1
Here is why: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
OK. solve this:
Mwen te louvri je m.
(1)Mwen te reveye.(2)Mwen te mete m alèz.
Answer: | 1 | 8 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
[EX Q]: Sonèt la te sonnen.
(1)Vizitè a te frape pòt la.(2)Madanm nan te lonyen nan trou pòt la.
[EX A]: 2
[EX Q]: Timoun nan te apprann li.
(1)Li te koumanse ale lekòl.(2)Li te sote yon class nan lekòl la.
[EX A]: 1
[EX Q]: Fwon ti gason an te santi cho.
(1)Manman li te pran tanperati li.(2)Manman li te mennen li nan pak.
[EX A]: | 1
| 6 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Input: Consider Input: Je mwen te vin rouj e gonfle.
(1)Mwen t'ap kriye.(2)Mwen t'ap ri.
Output: 1
Input: Consider Input: Bato a te kraze.
(1)Ekip la te nwaye.(2)Ekip la te bare ak pirat.
Output: 1
Input: Consider Input: Msye te pèdi sans tande li.
(1)Li te manke nwaye nan lanmè a.(2)Li te manke touye nan yon eksplozyon.
| Output: 2
| 2 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
See one example below:
Problem: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Solution: 1
Explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Problem: Ti gason an te fèmen deyò.
(1)Li te pase nan yon fenèt louvri.(2)Li te monte jouk sou do-kay la.
Solution: | 1 | 4 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Ex Input:
Tèt msye a te fè l mal nèt ak doulè a.
(1)Li te pran siwo pou tou li.(2)Li te pran aspirin.
Ex Output:
2
Ex Input:
Po mwen te develope yon gratèl.
(1)Mwen te touche fèy lagratèl nan lakou mwen.(2)Mwen te rashe lagratèl la soti lakou mwen.
Ex Output:
1
Ex Input:
Kanmarad yo te bay tò youn ak lòt.
(1)Yo te pèdi match yo.(2)Antrenè te anile antrènman an.
Ex Output:
| 1
| 1 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
One example: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Solution is here: 1
Explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Now, solve this: Egratinu sou po mwen te pwofon.
(1)Li te geri vit.(2)Li te kite yon plè.
Solution: | 2 | 6 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
One example: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Solution is here: 1
Explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Now, solve this: Ekip la te pèdi tounwa a.
(1)Yo te desi fan yo.(2)Yo te enspire fan yo.
Solution: | 1 | 6 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
[EX Q]: Mwen te soulve kouse sou divan an.
(1)Mwen t ap chèche monnen.(2)Mwen t ap met lòd nan salon an.
[EX A]: 1
[EX Q]: Liv yo te sòt tonbe de bibliyotèk la.
(1)Etajè liv yo te kouvè ak pousyè.(2)Yon tranbleman tè te vin shouke bibliyotèk la.
[EX A]: 2
[EX Q]: Ekip la te pèdi tounwa a.
(1)Yo te desi fan yo.(2)Yo te enspire fan yo.
[EX A]: | 1
| 6 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Solution: 1
Why? The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
New input: Pasaje yo te desann tren a.
(1)Tren a rive nan estasyon an.(2)Tren a te sonnen siflè li.
Solution: | 1 | 0 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
instruction:
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
question:
Msye a te fè tèt li remake nan foul la.
(1)Li te pote yon sak a do.(2)Li te pote yon vès liminez.
answer:
2
question:
Flèch sou konpitè a te deplase.
(1)Itilizatè a te klike sou souri òdinatè a.(2)Itilizatè te deplase souri a.
answer:
2
question:
Batiman an te dedye à milyonè a.
(1)Milyonè a te vle kraze batiman an.(2)Milyonè te bay kòb pou bati li.
answer:
| 2
| 9 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Q: Mwen te fè egzèsis.
(1)Mwen te santi m enèjik.(2)Mwen te pè.
A: 1
****
Q: Amègè a te pran koulè.
(1)Kwizinyè a te mete'l nan frizè.(2)Kwizinyè a te fè l griye.
A: 2
****
Q: Yo te lache msye a de prizon.
(1)Fanmi li te peye kosyon li.(2)Li te atake yon prizonye tankou li.
A: | 1
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
[EX Q]: Shyen an te jape.
(1)Shat la te chita sou divan an.(2)Nou te tande frape sou pòt la.
[EX A]: 2
[EX Q]: Jouwè a te atake advèsè li.
(1)Advèsè li te atrape pas la.(2)Advèsè li te tonbe atè.
[EX A]: 2
[EX Q]: Estati selèb la te fin boule nèt.
(1)Li te frape ak you kout zeklè.(2)Moun te vin venere li.
[EX A]: | 1
| 6 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Q: Fanmi an te demenaje nan yon lòt kay.
(1)Pitit gason a te fini lekòl Segondè.(2)Manman te fè marasa.
A: 2
****
Q: Kè aktè a t ap bat anvan pèfòmans li.
(1)Li te gen trak.(2)Li te aprann liy li pa kè.
A: 1
****
Q: Dife nan forè a te blayi.
(1)Van yo te vin pi fò.(2)Yo te arete ensandyè yo.
A: | 1
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Example solution: 1
Example explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Problem: Msye a te frape tèt li.
(1)Li te pèdi nan panse li.(2)Li te pran yon shok.
| Solution: 2 | 5 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
PROBLEM: Mizik vwazen mwen t ap sonnen fò.
(1)Mwen te mande li desann li.(2)Mwen te mande l prete sede li.
SOLUTION: 1
PROBLEM: Fi a te pèdi kontwòl bisiklèt li.
(1)Li te lache manch yo.(2)Li te frape yon kloti.
SOLUTION: 2
PROBLEM: Msye a te frape tèt li.
(1)Li te pèdi nan panse li.(2)Li te pran yon shok.
SOLUTION: | 2
| 8 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Seri a te louvri.
(1)Mwen te tounen kle a nan seri a.(2)Mwen te fè yon kopi de kle a.
1
Msye a te pèdi kapasite l pou pale.
(1)Li te fè yon anboli.(2)Li te pran yon gwo souf.
1
Oratè te bay yon blag.
(1)Asistans la te tonbe ri.(2)Asistans la te leve kanpe.
| 1
| 0 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Input: Consider Input: Batiman an te dedye à milyonè a.
(1)Milyonè a te vle kraze batiman an.(2)Milyonè te bay kòb pou bati li.
Output: 2
Input: Consider Input: Yo te sere boulon an.
(1)Mwen te ranplase boulon an.(2)Mwen te sere kle a.
Output: 2
Input: Consider Input: Mwen te met men m sou pwatrin mwen.
(1)Mwen te santi kè m ap bat.(2)Batman kè m mwen te vin pi vit.
| Output: 1
| 2 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
[Q]: Kriminèl la te vize revòlvè a sou viktim li.
(1)Kriminèl la te bese revòlvè li.(2)Viktim la te fè olèmen.
[A]: 2
[Q]: Msye a te vin enerve ak zanmi li.
(1)Zanmi li te entewonp li.(2)Zanmi li te achte li manje midi a.
[A]: 1
[Q]: Kontab yo te mal jere finans konpanyi yo.
(1)Yo te ranvoye l de post li.(2)Li te ale nan konje matènite.
[A]: | 1
| 5 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Output: 1
The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
New input case for you: Msye te santi l oblije asiste nan evènman an.
(1)Li te refize envitasyon zanmi li pou li vin asiste.(2)Li te pwomèt zanmi li ke li prale.
Output: | 2 | 1 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
instruction:
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
question:
Madanm nan te met pye li sou flam dife a.
(1)Flam yo te etenn.(2)Lafimen te leve nan flam dife a.
answer:
1
question:
Mwen te met menm anba tiyo ki t'ap koule a.
(1)Savon a te soti nan menm.(2)Dlo a te tonbe sou figi m.
answer:
1
question:
Msye te santi l oblije asiste nan evènman an.
(1)Li te refize envitasyon zanmi li pou li vin asiste.(2)Li te pwomèt zanmi li ke li prale.
answer:
| 2
| 9 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Solution: 1
Why? The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
New input: Yon ti poule te sòti nan ze a.
(1)Ze a te kouve.(2)Mwen te kase ze a.
Solution: | 1 | 0 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
PROBLEM: Madanm nan te mashe ak beki.
(1)Li te raze janm ni.(2)Li te kase janm ni.
SOLUTION: 2
PROBLEM: Msye a te bwè anpil nan fèt la.
(1)Li te gen maltèt landemen.(2)Li te gen nen k'ap koule landemen.
SOLUTION: 1
PROBLEM: Paran yo te vle timoun yo ale nan kolèj.
(1)Yo te met yon fon pou leson prive de kote.(2)Yo te ankouraje timoun yo jwe deyò.
SOLUTION: | 1
| 8 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Example solution: 1
Example explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Problem: Yo te mete maren an nan karantèn.
(1)Li te expoze a maladi a.(2)Li te geri de maladi a.
| Solution: 1 | 5 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Let me give you an example: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
The answer to this example can be: 1
Here is why: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
OK. solve this:
Limyè sikilasyon an te tounen jòn.
(1)Chofè a te met fren a.(2)Chofè a te klaxonen.
Answer: | 1 | 8 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Output: 1
The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
New input case for you: Kriminèl la te egzekite.
(1)Yo te mete l nan prizon.(2)Yo te kondane pou asasina.
Output: | 2 | 1 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
PROBLEM: Yon twou te chire nan jin mwen.
(1)Mwen te zipe jin mwen.(2)Mwen te trebiche sou trotwa a.
SOLUTION: 2
PROBLEM: Mwen te pliye papye a.
(1)Mwen te resikle papye a.(2)Papye a te pran yon pli.
SOLUTION: 2
PROBLEM: Kriminèl la te sove ale lapolis la.
(1)Lapolis la te okipe viktim nan.(2)Lapolis la te chase kriminèl la.
SOLUTION: | 2
| 8 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Ex Input:
Jij la te frape mato li.
(1)Moun yo te koumanse rele nan tribinal la.(2)Jiri a te anonse jijman li.
Ex Output:
1
Ex Input:
Mizik la te twò ba pou nou te ka antann li.
(1)Mwen te monte volim nan.(2)Mwen te konpoze pwòp chanson pa m.
Ex Output:
1
Ex Input:
Kriminèl la te egzekite.
(1)Yo te mete l nan prizon.(2)Yo te kondane pou asasina.
Ex Output:
| 2
| 1 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
One example is below.
Q: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
A: 1
Rationale: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Q: Kriminèl la te sove ale lapolis la.
(1)Lapolis la te okipe viktim nan.(2)Lapolis la te chase kriminèl la.
A: | 2 | 9 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Output: 1
The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
New input case for you: Pye bwa a te pèdi fèy li.
(1)Fèy yo te tounen diferan koulè.(2)Fèy yo te ramase atè.
Output: | 2 | 1 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
[EX Q]: Mwen te rete kanpe ta.
(1)Mwen te fe de rev vif swa sa a.(2)Mwen te fatige nan maten.
[EX A]: 2
[EX Q]: Yo tap monte yon bilding bòkot biwo mwen.
(1)Biwo mwen te gen anpil moun.(2)Biwo mwen te gen anpil bwi.
[EX A]: 2
[EX Q]: Msye a te koumanse yon kont avè m.
(1)Zanmi m te prezante m a msye a.(2)Zanmi mwen te fè pa m.
[EX A]: | 2
| 6 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
[Q]: Veso an plastik la te fonn.
(1)Mwen te met veso plastik la nan yon dlo tiyèd.(2)Mwen te met veso a nan yon fou cho.
[A]: 2
[Q]: Afich la te kole sou mi a.
(1)Mwen te mete afich la sou pòt la.(2)Mwen te mete tep dèyè afich la.
[A]: 2
[Q]: Madanm nan te fè jalouzi pou sè li.
(1)Sè li te kontan.(2)Sè li te divose.
[A]: | 1
| 5 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example input: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Example output: 1
Example explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Q: Ekip la te mare konkou a pou avantaj pa yo.
(1)Yo te genyen.(2)Yo te abondonnen.
A: | 1 | 3 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Input: Consider Input: Aksidan an se te fòt mwen.
(1)Mwen te santi mwen koupab.(2)Mwen te pòte plent.
Output: 1
Input: Consider Input: Madanm nan te mete soulye li.
(1)Li te konn tout moun nan fèt la.(2)Li te vle kite fèt la.
Output: 2
Input: Consider Input: Ekip la te mare konkou a pou avantaj pa yo.
(1)Yo te genyen.(2)Yo te abondonnen.
| Output: 1
| 2 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
One example is below.
Q: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
A: 1
Rationale: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Q: Politisyen an te kodane pou frod.
(1)Li te fè kanpay pou li vin re-elu.(2)Yo te fè li sòti nan pouvwa.
A: | 2 | 9 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
instruction:
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
question:
Asosye a te rakwoche sou mwen.
(1)Mwen te mande pale dirijan an.(2)Mwen te bay nimewo idantite mwen.
answer:
1
question:
Kriminèl la te vize revòlvè a sou viktim li.
(1)Kriminèl la te bese revòlvè li.(2)Viktim la te fè olèmen.
answer:
2
question:
Politisyen an te kodane pou frod.
(1)Li te fè kanpay pou li vin re-elu.(2)Yo te fè li sòti nan pouvwa.
answer:
| 2
| 9 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
--------
Question: Msye a te vin enerve ak zanmi li.
(1)Zanmi li te entewonp li.(2)Zanmi li te achte li manje midi a.
Answer: 1
Question: Ti gason an te mache nan labou.
(1)Labou a te kole sou soulye li.(2)Labou a te frape li nan figi.
Answer: 1
Question: Je kwizinye a te fè dlo.
(1)Li te fini ak zonyon yo.(2)Li te koupe yon zonyon.
Answer: | 2
| 7 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
[Q]: Drektè Jeneral konpayi a te bay demisyon li.
(1)Consèy administrasyon an te disoud konpayi a.(2)Consèy administasyon an te jwenn yon ranplasan.
[A]: 2
[Q]: Te gen anpil blokis sou gran wout la.
(1)Mwen te pran yon detounen.(2)Mwen te mande yon woulib.
[A]: 1
[Q]: Papa a pa t kontan alkolis piti gason li.
(1)Pap a te achte piti gason li yon byè.(2)Papa a te fè pitit gason li soti nan kay la.
[A]: | 2
| 5 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example input: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Example output: 1
Example explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Q: Sak fatra a la ten plen.
(1)Mwen te pote l nan boko fatra a.(2)Mwen te jete l nan lavabo a.
A: | 1 | 3 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Output: 1
The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
New input case for you: Madanm nan te pèdi plas li nan liy nan.
(1)Pi plis moun te vin rantre nan liy nan.(2)Li te sòti nan liy la.
Output: | 2 | 1 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
PROBLEM: Msye a te prevwa fredi sou vwayaj li.
(1)Li te pote rad cho nan malet li.(2)Li te vwayaje ak yon gwo malet.
SOLUTION: 1
PROBLEM: Madan m nan te pran retrèt.
(1)Li te resevwa pansyon li.(2)Li te fin peye lajan sou kay li.
SOLUTION: 1
PROBLEM: Msye a te defèt lasèt soulye li.
(1)Soulye yo te vin pi lach.(2)Soulye yo te vin chire.
SOLUTION: | 1
| 8 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
Teacher: In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Solution: 1
Reason: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Now, solve this instance: Mwen te fin kaptive nan liv la.
(1)Mwen te pote liv la tounen.(2)Mwen te bliye lè a.
Student: | 2 | 2 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
instruction:
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
question:
Elektrisite lakay mwen te femen.
(1)Mwen te limen yon lanp.(2)Mwen te rekonekte disjonktè a.
answer:
2
question:
Msye te fyè frè li.
(1)Frè li te dispite ak paran li.(2)Frè le te aksepte nan lekòl de dwa.
answer:
2
question:
Doktè a te diagnoze malad la.
(1)Li te idantifye sentòm malad la.(2)Li te preskri grenn pou malad la.
answer:
| 1
| 9 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Output: 1
The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
New input case for you: Madanm nan te kenbe gòj li.
(1)Li te vale manje li.(2)Li te toufe sou manje li.
Output: | 2 | 1 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Output: 1
The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
New input case for you: Lapli te koumanse tonbe.
(1)Chofè a te limen limyè devan machin nan.(2)Chofè a te mete machin nan sou bak.
Output: | 1 | 1 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Input: Consider Input: Mwen te pedi pasyans mwen.
(1)Zanmi mwen te fè m tann.(2)Zanmi mwen rive a lè.
Output: 1
Input: Consider Input: Mwen te limen alimèt la.
(1)Flam la te etenn.(2)Alimèt la te fè yon flam.
Output: 2
Input: Consider Input: Lapli te koumanse tonbe.
(1)Chofè a te limen limyè devan machin nan.(2)Chofè a te mete machin nan sou bak.
| Output: 1
| 2 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example input: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Example output: 1
Example explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Q: Peyi a te deklare lagè sou teritwa vwazen an.
(1)Yo te voye solda al goumen.(2)Solda yo te reyini ak fanmi yo.
A: | 1 | 3 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Q: Msye a te megri.
(1)Moun te izole li.(2)Moun te fe l konpliman.
A: 2
****
Q: Stèk la te difisil pou koupe.
(1)Kouto a pa t file.(2)Stèk la te kri.
A: 1
****
Q: Ti gason an te sere balon an.
(1)Balon an te pete.(2)Balon an t al vole.
A: | 1
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
[EX Q]: Lasèt timoun nan te vin defèt.
(1)Li te aprann ki jan pou mare yo.(2)Li te kouri nan lakou a.
[EX A]: 2
[EX Q]: Fi a te rete lakay li e pat al lekòl.
(1)Li te gen saranpyonl.(2)Li te renmen aprann mat.
[EX A]: 1
[EX Q]: Peyi a te deklare lagè sou teritwa vwazen an.
(1)Yo te voye solda al goumen.(2)Solda yo te reyini ak fanmi yo.
[EX A]: | 1
| 6 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
PROBLEM: Yon ti poule te sòti nan ze a.
(1)Ze a te kouve.(2)Mwen te kase ze a.
SOLUTION: 1
PROBLEM: Fi a te chanje lekòl.
(1)Lekòl la te lage pou grann vakans yo.(2)Li te demenaje pou ale nan yon lòt vil.
SOLUTION: 2
PROBLEM: Mwen te achte manman m yon kado.
(1)Mwen te fè li yon gato.(2)Se te fèt li.
SOLUTION: | 2
| 8 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Ex Input:
Ekonomi nasyon an te desann.
(1)Anpil moun te vin malad.(2)Anpil moun te jwenn chomaj.
Ex Output:
2
Ex Input:
Mwen te reprann kalm mwen aprè m te fè kolè.
(1)Kè mwen t'ap sote.(2)Mwen te pran kèk gwo souf.
Ex Output:
2
Ex Input:
Espresyon sou figi m te kontan nèt.
(1)Mwen te resevwa bon nouvèl.(2)Mwen te pèdi pasyans mwen.
Ex Output:
| 1
| 1 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example input: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Example output: 1
Example explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Q: Ti toutous la te sali tapi a.
(1)Mèt la te joure ti toutous la.(2)Mèt la te bay li yon sirèt.
A: | 1 | 3 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example input: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Example output: 1
Example explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Q: Msye a te resevwa yon kotravansyon.
(1)Li te mal estasyonen sou wout la.(2)Met pakin la te fini.
A: | 2 | 3 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
One example: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Solution is here: 1
Explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Now, solve this: Afich la te kole sou mi a.
(1)Mwen te mete afich la sou pòt la.(2)Mwen te mete tep dèyè afich la.
Solution: | 2 | 6 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
See one example below:
Problem: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Solution: 1
Explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Problem: Fi a te pran odè yon bagay kap boule.
(1)Li pran bonbon yo nan bokal la.(2)Li te kite bonbon yo nan fou a.
Solution: | 2 | 4 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
[EX Q]: Madanm nan te vwayaje aletranje.
(1)Li te vle aprann fè desen.(2)Li te vle aprann pi plis sou lòt kilti.
[EX A]: 2
[EX Q]: Timoun nan te graje jenou li.
(1)Manman li voye l nan chanm ni.(2)Manman li te mete yon pansman sou blesi a.
[EX A]: 2
[EX Q]: Plim nan te vid.
(1)Mwen te sèvi ak yon kreyon.(2)Mwen te siyen nonm.
[EX A]: | 1
| 6 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Let me give you an example: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
The answer to this example can be: 1
Here is why: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
OK. solve this:
Fi a te pense nen li.
(1)Ti bebe a te bave sou bavèt li.(2)Ti bebe a te sali couch li.
Answer: | 2 | 8 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example input: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Example output: 1
Example explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Q: Men mwen te vin kole.
(1)Mwen te manje yon benyè.(2)Mwen te gen dan dous.
A: | 1 | 3 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example Input: Mwen te siye menm ak yon sèvyèt.
(1)Sèvyèt la te mouye.(2)Men mwen te mouye.
Example Output: 2
Example Input: Jèn kanper yo te santi yo pè.
(1)Animatè a te rakonte yo yon istwa fantom.(2)Yo te griye mashmalo sou dife boukan an.
Example Output: 1
Example Input: Mwen te ranvese diven sou chemiz mwen.
(1)Mwen te mete yon tabliye.(2)Mwen te chanje chemiz mwen.
Example Output: | 2
| 3 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example Input: Kesye a te louvri kès la.
(1)Klian an te sèche nan bous li.(2)Klian an te bay li lajan an.
Example Output: 2
Example Input: Machin nan te vin arete tou dousman.
(1)Li te fini a gaz la.(2)Chofè a te tonbe dòmi.
Example Output: 1
Example Input: Msye a te tashe kostim ni.
(1)Li te fè li netwaye.(2)Li te mete li kroke nan amwa a.
Example Output: | 1
| 3 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
PROBLEM: Mwen te pran yon mòso nan pèch la.
(1)Pèch la te abime.(2)Ju te soti ladann.
SOLUTION: 2
PROBLEM: Msye a te chape maladi mòtèl la.
(1)Li te siyen testaman li.(2)Li te resevwa yon transplantasyon ògan.
SOLUTION: 2
PROBLEM: Msye a te konfese lanmou li pou madanm nan.
(1)Madanm nan te rejte li.(2)Madanm nan te anvye li.
SOLUTION: | 1
| 8 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
One example: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Solution is here: 1
Explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Now, solve this: Msye te reisi pran yon diplòm.
(1)Li te vin kalifye pou travay li te vle a.(2)Of pou travay la te vin anile.
Solution: | 1 | 6 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example input: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Example output: 1
Example explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Q: Biwo a te fèmen.
(1)Se te vakans.(2)Se te ete.
A: | 1 | 3 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
One example is below.
Q: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
A: 1
Rationale: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Q: Tiimoun nan te retire men li vit.
(1)Li te touche fou cho a.(2)Li te karese tèt ti toutou a.
A: | 1 | 9 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
PROBLEM: Madanm nan te gen sènman sou je li.
(1)Li te rete kanpe tout lannwit la.(2)Li te met pitit gason li dòmi.
SOLUTION: 1
PROBLEM: Msye a te bwè anpil nan fèt la.
(1)Li te gen maltèt landemen.(2)Li te gen nen k'ap koule landemen.
SOLUTION: 1
PROBLEM: Madanm nan deklare li te wè yon fantom.
(1)Akwentans li te enkrendil.(2)Akwentans li te konprann li.
SOLUTION: | 1
| 8 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Input: Consider Input: Stad la te jwe im nasyonal la.
(1)Fan yo te tounen vè drapo a.(2)Fan yo te anvayi teren an.
Output: 1
Input: Consider Input: Koup la te fiyanse.
(1)Yo te planifie yon mariaj.(2)Yo te pran tan apa.
Output: 1
Input: Consider Input: Mwen te tire cheve magouyè a.
(1)Perik li te vin sòti.(2)Li te vin chòv.
| Output: 1
| 2 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
--------
Question: Ti gason an te pense koud fi a.
(1)Li te ose zepòl li.(2)Li te vit rekile bra li.
Answer: 2
Question: Timoun nan te ateri sou tranplen an.
(1)Li te voltije anlè.(2)Li te deside eseye fè yon so kabrit.
Answer: 1
Question: Mwen te bliye lè a.
(1)Mwen t'ap reve.(2)Mwen te santi m dekonpoze.
Answer: | 1
| 7 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Output: 1
The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
New input case for you: Bwat imèl li te plen spam.
(1)Li te retire spam nan.(2)Li te voye tout moun yon mesaj imèl an mas.
Output: | 1 | 1 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
One example is below.
Q: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
A: 1
Rationale: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Q: Mwen te rate apèl menaj mwen.
(1)Mwen te rele li ankò.(2)Mwen te rankontre li pou dine.
A: | 1 | 9 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
[EX Q]: Amègè a te pran koulè.
(1)Kwizinyè a te mete'l nan frizè.(2)Kwizinyè a te fè l griye.
[EX A]: 2
[EX Q]: Mwen te mete gan kaoutshou.
(1)Mwe t ap pare pou lave men mwen.(2)Mwen t ap pare pou netwaye sal dlo a.
[EX A]: 2
[EX Q]: Mwen te rate apèl menaj mwen.
(1)Mwen te rele li ankò.(2)Mwen te rankontre li pou dine.
[EX A]: | 1
| 6 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
See one example below:
Problem: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Solution: 1
Explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Problem: Vwayajè yo te anrejistre pou chanm otel la.
(1)Yo te defèt malèt yo.(2)Yo te ale nan aeropò a.
Solution: | 1 | 4 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Etidyan an te fini inivèsite a.
(1)Li te chache yon travay.(2)Li te koumanse yon pastan.
1
Bwat imèl li te plen spam.
(1)Li te retire spam nan.(2)Li te voye tout moun yon mesaj imèl an mas.
1
Mwen te reflechi byen sou pwoblèm nan.
(1)Mwen te mande konsèy.(2)Mwen te jwenn yon solisyon.
| 2
| 0 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example input: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Example output: 1
Example explanation: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Q: Madanm nan te rete chita sou veranda a.
(1)Li te vle gade kouche solèy la.(2)Li te kwè li te wè eklè.
A: | 1 | 3 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
--------
Question: Jouwè a te atake advèsè li.
(1)Advèsè li te atrape pas la.(2)Advèsè li te tonbe atè.
Answer: 2
Question: Sòs la te gen gou fad.
(1)Mwen te sèvi li.(2)Mwen te met sèl ladann.
Answer: 2
Question: Mwen mete lenj mouye a deyò sou liy rad la.
(1)Lenj la te vin sèk.(2)Lenj la te vin tashe.
Answer: | 1
| 7 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Solution: 1
Why? The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
New input: Kaoutchou bisiklèt mwen te plat.
(1)Mwen te met lè nan kaoutchou a.(2)Mwen te chanje vitès bisiklèt la.
Solution: | 1 | 0 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Example: Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Output: 1
The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
New input case for you: Mizik la te twò ba pou nou te ka antann li.
(1)Mwen te monte volim nan.(2)Mwen te konpoze pwòp chanson pa m.
Output: | 1 | 1 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
instruction:
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
question:
Etidyan te resevwa yon bous pou ale nan kolèj.
(1)Kamarad klas li te respekte li.(2)Li te gen bon nòt.
answer:
2
question:
Mwen te mache pye atè sou plaj la.
(1)Sab te kole nan pye mwen.(2)Vag te vin kraze sou plaj la.
answer:
1
question:
Kaoutchou bisiklèt mwen te plat.
(1)Mwen te met lè nan kaoutchou a.(2)Mwen te chanje vitès bisiklèt la.
answer:
| 1
| 9 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Kaoutchou bisiklèt mwen te plat.
(1)Mwen te met lè nan kaoutchou a.(2)Mwen te chanje vitès bisiklèt la.
1
Yo te refize msye a kob la.
(1)Li te nan dèt.(2)Li te koumanse yon biznis.
1
Mwen te santi m alèz.
(1)Mwen te ajenouye atè a.(2)Mwen te vlope kò m nan yon lenn.
| 2
| 0 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
instruction:
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
question:
Msye te pèdi ekilib li sou nechèl la.
(1)Li te monte nechèl la.(2)Li te sòt tonbe sou nechèl la.
answer:
2
question:
Kamyon an te fè kolizyon ak machin nan.
(1)Kamyon an te ale pi vit.(2)Machin nan te vin kraze.
answer:
2
question:
Msye a te vin enerve ak zanmi li.
(1)Zanmi li te entewonp li.(2)Zanmi li te achte li manje midi a.
answer:
| 1
| 9 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
Teacher: In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
Atik la te vlope ak papye bul.
(1)Li te frajil.(2)Li te piti.
Solution: 1
Reason: The first alternative makes more sense because you put object is bubble wrap if they are delicate.
Now, solve this instance: Madanm nan te frape sofa a.
(1)Pye sofa a te vin lach.(2)Li te pran yon ble nan jenou li.
Student: | 2 | 2 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
--------
Question: Oratè te bay yon blag.
(1)Asistans la te tonbe ri.(2)Asistans la te leve kanpe.
Answer: 1
Question: Mwen te kite travay mwen bonè.
(1)Mwen te gen maltèt.(2)Patwon mwen t ap enbe yon reyinyon.
Answer: 1
Question: Mwen te bese tèt mwen.
(1)Yo te lanse fedatifis yo nan atmosfè a.(2)Frisbi a te vole sou tèt mwen.
Answer: | 2
| 7 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
In this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Haitian. You must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is "premise
(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2", the output should either be "1" or "2" based on your judgment.
Msye te pran yon somnifè.
(1)Li te vin santi li andomi.(2)Li te fè yon fièv.
1
Madanm nan te bay sè I yon moushwa papye.
(1)Sè madanm nan te kwaze bra li.(2)Sè madanm nan te koumanse kriye.
2
Pandul la te sonnen.
(1)Se te debu lè a.(2)Lè a te sanble trenen.
| 1
| 0 | NIv2 | task1168_xcopa_commonsense_reasoning_ht | fs_opt |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.