File size: 11,607 Bytes
ac1a6c6
322a73a
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ac1a6c6
9620987
e677e0f
 
9620987
e677e0f
9620987
e677e0f
9620987
 
1825b68
 
9620987
1825b68
9620987
1825b68
9620987
 
b0a91ab
 
9620987
b0a91ab
9620987
b0a91ab
9620987
 
00c7ccc
 
9620987
00c7ccc
9620987
00c7ccc
9620987
 
3a190de
 
9620987
3a190de
9620987
3a190de
9620987
 
dba40f8
 
9620987
dba40f8
9620987
dba40f8
9620987
fe6c0ad
1825b68
 
9620987
1825b68
9620987
1825b68
9620987
 
754ab21
 
9620987
754ab21
9620987
754ab21
9620987
 
a34ba88
 
9620987
a34ba88
9620987
a34ba88
9620987
3aa4f3c
79579ce
 
9620987
79579ce
9620987
79579ce
9620987
 
79579ce
 
9620987
79579ce
9620987
79579ce
9620987
2eec591
 
 
9620987
2eec591
9620987
2eec591
9620987
 
fe6c0ad
 
9620987
fe6c0ad
9620987
fe6c0ad
9620987
ac1a6c6
322a73a
 
 
 
 
 
a7c6fd6
 
 
322a73a
9620987
322a73a
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
a7c6fd6
3aa4f3c
a7c6fd6
 
ee40c96
 
1837601
9620987
69ce360
322a73a
 
 
 
 
a7c6fd6
322a73a
 
 
a7c6fd6
3aa4f3c
a7c6fd6
 
ee40c96
 
1837601
9620987
69ce360
322a73a
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
c2e4986
 
322a73a
 
 
 
 
c2e4986
322a73a
c2e4986
 
322a73a
c2e4986
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
322a73a
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
---
pretty_name: procedural-extraction
language:
- en
license: mit
task_categories:
- token-classification
- question-answering
tags:
- tasksource
- jev
- extraction
- clairic
- procedural
- synthetic
configs:
- config_name: record_field_extraction
  data_files:
  - split: train
    path: record_field_extraction/train-*.parquet
  - split: validation
    path: record_field_extraction/validation-*.parquet
  - split: test
    path: record_field_extraction/test-*.parquet
- config_name: state_update_extraction
  data_files:
  - split: train
    path: state_update_extraction/train-*.parquet
  - split: validation
    path: state_update_extraction/validation-*.parquet
  - split: test
    path: state_update_extraction/test-*.parquet
- config_name: conditional_list_extraction
  data_files:
  - split: train
    path: conditional_list_extraction/train-*.parquet
  - split: validation
    path: conditional_list_extraction/validation-*.parquet
  - split: test
    path: conditional_list_extraction/test-*.parquet
- config_name: log_query_extraction
  data_files:
  - split: train
    path: log_query_extraction/train-*.parquet
  - split: validation
    path: log_query_extraction/validation-*.parquet
  - split: test
    path: log_query_extraction/test-*.parquet
- config_name: typed_mention_extraction
  data_files:
  - split: train
    path: typed_mention_extraction/train-*.parquet
  - split: validation
    path: typed_mention_extraction/validation-*.parquet
  - split: test
    path: typed_mention_extraction/test-*.parquet
- config_name: business_document_extraction
  data_files:
  - split: train
    path: business_document_extraction/train-*.parquet
  - split: validation
    path: business_document_extraction/validation-*.parquet
  - split: test
    path: business_document_extraction/test-*.parquet
- config_name: nested_structure_extraction
  data_files:
  - split: train
    path: nested_structure_extraction/train-*.parquet
  - split: validation
    path: nested_structure_extraction/validation-*.parquet
  - split: test
    path: nested_structure_extraction/test-*.parquet
- config_name: html_extraction
  data_files:
  - split: train
    path: html_extraction/train-*.parquet
  - split: validation
    path: html_extraction/validation-*.parquet
  - split: test
    path: html_extraction/test-*.parquet
- config_name: date_range_extraction
  data_files:
  - split: train
    path: date_range_extraction/train-*.parquet
  - split: validation
    path: date_range_extraction/validation-*.parquet
  - split: test
    path: date_range_extraction/test-*.parquet
- config_name: spec_match_extraction
  data_files:
  - split: train
    path: spec_match_extraction/train-*.parquet
  - split: validation
    path: spec_match_extraction/validation-*.parquet
  - split: test
    path: spec_match_extraction/test-*.parquet
- config_name: lookalike_field_extraction
  data_files:
  - split: train
    path: lookalike_field_extraction/train-*.parquet
  - split: validation
    path: lookalike_field_extraction/validation-*.parquet
  - split: test
    path: lookalike_field_extraction/test-*.parquet
- config_name: structure_lookup_extraction
  data_files:
  - split: train
    path: structure_lookup_extraction/train-*.parquet
  - split: validation
    path: structure_lookup_extraction/validation-*.parquet
  - split: test
    path: structure_lookup_extraction/test-*.parquet
- config_name: relational_span_extraction
  data_files:
  - split: train
    path: relational_span_extraction/train-*.parquet
  - split: validation
    path: relational_span_extraction/validation-*.parquet
  - split: test
    path: relational_span_extraction/test-*.parquet
---

# procedural-extraction

Procedurally generated extraction requests: one text and several typed fields to fill from it in one pass, as
extraction models (e.g. Cloudflare's Clairic) are asked. Each field is `text` (one span) or `list` (every
matching span) and is answered with character spans of the text or null. Answers are computed by construction,
so spans are exact and labels noise-free (each generator samples a latent structure, such as a fact store,
a merged configuration tree or a DOM, and a solver computes the answer; independent readers of the rendered
texts recompute every answer in reasoning-core's tests); nulls are earned (the text mentions a negated, proposed, former or
other entity's value, not nothing). The tasks are generated by
[reasoning-core](https://github.com/sileod/reasoning-core) (commit `388d64a`, see
[provenance.json](provenance.json)) and are a procedural component of the `extraction` config of
[tasksource-jev-typed-decisions](https://huggingface.co/datasets/tasksource/tasksource-jev-typed-decisions).

| config | what is extracted |
|---|---|
| `record_field_extraction` | A person's city, employer, job title, phone, email and birth date, from prose about several people with near-miss names; negated, former, hoped-for and relatives' values as confusers; "same city/company as X" chains |
| `state_update_extraction` | The value in force (or before the last change) of plan slots, from a timestamped chat of statements, proposals approved/rejected/pending, corrections and undos, out of order from level 2 |
| `conditional_list_extraction` | Every order id or product meeting conjunctive, negated or numeric conditions after later updates, or the heaviest such order; prose, bullets or a table |
| `log_query_extraction` | Every request id or user of log lines matching filters on level, exact service (auth vs auth-proxy), status, latency and user, or the latest/slowest match; plain, logfmt or JSON lines |
| `typed_mention_extraction` | Named-entity style: every mention of each requested type, where one name (Jordan) is a person, place, organization or product by context; companies by a defined current role among former and unrelated relations; codes by a stated format among near-miss strings |
| `business_document_extraction` | The value in force on a date in an invoice, purchase order, contract or insurance policy: numbered amendments override printed values and each other, dated windows, schedule references that chain, asked keys left out while their near-miss key is stated (subtotal vs total) |
| `nested_structure_extraction` | Path, any-depth and predicate-filter queries on a JSON, YAML or XML configuration whose override layers deep-merge or replace whole blocks |
| `html_extraction` | Fields of the main item in raw HTML: scope (nested and related item cards), visibility (hidden, template, struck prices), dt/dd, label-for, attributes and spec tables with rowspan/colspan |
| `date_range_extraction` | Every invoice, shipment, contract or ticket whose date of one role (issued vs due) falls in a range, before/after a date, in a month or on a weekday, or the earliest/latest; dates ISO, worded, day/month or month/day numeric under a stated section convention, year-less under a stated year, or relative to another record |
| `spec_match_extraction` | Every laptop, e-bike or monitor meeting conjunctive spec requirements, or the best such one; specs and thresholds in mixed exact units (g/kg, GB/TB, min/h, Wh/kWh, in/cm) and a stated number convention (1.234,5), near-miss products failing one requirement, unstated specs not qualifying |
| `lookalike_field_extraction` | Fields asked by role (issue vs delivery date, subtotal vs tax, sender vs approver, order vs tracking number, billing vs return address, phones, weights, durations) from a form, sections, table, prose, email, log or YAML-like record; an asked role that is not stated is null although same-typed values of other roles are, or shows a placeholder (pending, N/A); a conditional or policy value of the role (a late fee that may apply) is not the answer |
| `structure_lookup_extraction` | A value by its place: a section path (Billing > Contact > Phone) in an outline whose labels recur under other sections, or a cell of one of several same-column tables picked by row and column, a condition on another column or a row position; Markdown, ASCII, CSV, aligned or transposed tables; null when the place exists only elsewhere or the cell is empty |
| `relational_span_extraction` | Every mention of an event's direct or indirect causes or effects in a narrative with temporal-only and ruled-out look-alikes, or of what follows from facts and if-then rules (some conjunctive), what triggers an event and what it triggers |

Levels 0 to 4 are drawn uniformly; `level` is a column. Mean per-field score by level (0 / 1 / 2 / 3 / 4):

| config | train | validation | test | DeepSeek-v4-flash | GLiNER-large |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| `record_field_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 1.00 / 0.96 / 0.81 / 0.72 / 0.62 | 0.80 / 0.59 / 0.36 / 0.45 / 0.38 |
| `state_update_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.84 / 0.76 / 0.77 / 0.68 / 0.51 | 0.58 / 0.46 / 0.37 / 0.36 / 0.29 |
| `conditional_list_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.88 / 0.79 / 0.70 / 0.64 / 0.52 | 0.29 / 0.17 / 0.12 / 0.05 / 0.10 |
| `log_query_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.86 / 0.76 / 0.68 / 0.63 / 0.59 | 0.31 / 0.16 / 0.09 / 0.24 / 0.15 |
| `typed_mention_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.85 / 0.80 / 0.79 / 0.69 / 0.66 | 0.40 / 0.42 / 0.49 / 0.34 / 0.39 |
| `business_document_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.70 / 0.77 / 0.76 / 0.81 / 0.75 | 0.53 / 0.49 / 0.45 / 0.40 / 0.30 |
| `nested_structure_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.93 / 0.88 / 0.94 / 0.86 / 0.86 | 0.18 / 0.20 / 0.20 / 0.20 / 0.18 |
| `html_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.98 / 0.96 / 0.94 / 0.98 / 0.90 | 0.35 / 0.31 / 0.30 / 0.27 / 0.39 |
| `date_range_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.75 / 0.62 / 0.60 / 0.44 / 0.44 | 0.16 / 0.03 / 0.03 / 0.00 / 0.02 |
| `spec_match_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.81 / 0.53 / 0.27 / 0.25 / 0.17 | 0.11 / 0.08 / 0.04 / 0.03 / 0.04 |
| `lookalike_field_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.93 / 0.96 / 0.89 / 0.85 / 0.80 | 0.37 / 0.35 / 0.23 / 0.22 / 0.09 |
| `structure_lookup_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 1.00 / 0.99 / 0.97 / 0.97 / 0.91 | 0.27 / 0.12 / 0.07 / 0.07 / 0.09 |
| `relational_span_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.83 / 0.85 / 0.85 / 0.84 / 0.73 | 0.16 / 0.11 / 0.09 / 0.07 / 0.07 |

## Schema

`state` (the text), `fields` (`[{name, type, instruction}]`), `answers` (one per field: `{null, values:
[{text, start, end}]}`, `state[start:end] == text`), `metadata` (JSON: level, state seed), `level`.

## Citation

If you use tasksource, its standardized task annotations, or datasets derived from them in published research, please cite the tasksource paper (Sileo, LREC-COLING 2024). The procedural data is generated with Reasoning Core; please also cite the Reasoning Core paper (Sileo et al., 2026).

```bibtex
@inproceedings{sileo-2024-tasksource,
    title = "tasksource: A Large Collection of {NLP} tasks with a Structured Dataset Preprocessing Framework",
    author = "Sileo, Damien",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024)",
    month = may,
    year = "2024",
    address = "Torino, Italia",
    publisher = "ELRA and ICCL",
    url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.lrec-main.1361",
    doi = "10.63317/2h4pkr685mkq",
    pages = "15655--15684",
}

@article{sileo2026reasoning,
  title={Reasoning Core: Designing Broad Procedural Data for Completion-Supervised Reasoning Training},
  author={Sileo, Damien and Lacombe, Valentin and Kachler, Dimitri},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.05148},
  year={2026},
  url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.05148}
}
```