--- pretty_name: procedural-extraction language: - en license: mit task_categories: - token-classification - question-answering tags: - tasksource - jev - extraction - clairic - procedural - synthetic configs: - config_name: record_field_extraction data_files: - split: train path: record_field_extraction/train-*.parquet - split: validation path: record_field_extraction/validation-*.parquet - split: test path: record_field_extraction/test-*.parquet - config_name: state_update_extraction data_files: - split: train path: state_update_extraction/train-*.parquet - split: validation path: state_update_extraction/validation-*.parquet - split: test path: state_update_extraction/test-*.parquet - config_name: conditional_list_extraction data_files: - split: train path: conditional_list_extraction/train-*.parquet - split: validation path: conditional_list_extraction/validation-*.parquet - split: test path: conditional_list_extraction/test-*.parquet - config_name: log_query_extraction data_files: - split: train path: log_query_extraction/train-*.parquet - split: validation path: log_query_extraction/validation-*.parquet - split: test path: log_query_extraction/test-*.parquet - config_name: typed_mention_extraction data_files: - split: train path: typed_mention_extraction/train-*.parquet - split: validation path: typed_mention_extraction/validation-*.parquet - split: test path: typed_mention_extraction/test-*.parquet - config_name: business_document_extraction data_files: - split: train path: business_document_extraction/train-*.parquet - split: validation path: business_document_extraction/validation-*.parquet - split: test path: business_document_extraction/test-*.parquet - config_name: nested_structure_extraction data_files: - split: train path: nested_structure_extraction/train-*.parquet - split: validation path: nested_structure_extraction/validation-*.parquet - split: test path: nested_structure_extraction/test-*.parquet - config_name: html_extraction data_files: - split: train path: html_extraction/train-*.parquet - split: validation path: html_extraction/validation-*.parquet - split: test path: html_extraction/test-*.parquet - config_name: date_range_extraction data_files: - split: train path: date_range_extraction/train-*.parquet - split: validation path: date_range_extraction/validation-*.parquet - split: test path: date_range_extraction/test-*.parquet - config_name: spec_match_extraction data_files: - split: train path: spec_match_extraction/train-*.parquet - split: validation path: spec_match_extraction/validation-*.parquet - split: test path: spec_match_extraction/test-*.parquet - config_name: lookalike_field_extraction data_files: - split: train path: lookalike_field_extraction/train-*.parquet - split: validation path: lookalike_field_extraction/validation-*.parquet - split: test path: lookalike_field_extraction/test-*.parquet - config_name: structure_lookup_extraction data_files: - split: train path: structure_lookup_extraction/train-*.parquet - split: validation path: structure_lookup_extraction/validation-*.parquet - split: test path: structure_lookup_extraction/test-*.parquet - config_name: relational_span_extraction data_files: - split: train path: relational_span_extraction/train-*.parquet - split: validation path: relational_span_extraction/validation-*.parquet - split: test path: relational_span_extraction/test-*.parquet --- # procedural-extraction Procedurally generated extraction requests: one text and several typed fields to fill from it in one pass, as extraction models (e.g. Cloudflare's Clairic) are asked. Each field is `text` (one span) or `list` (every matching span) and is answered with character spans of the text or null. Answers are computed by construction, so spans are exact and labels noise-free (each generator samples a latent structure, such as a fact store, a merged configuration tree or a DOM, and a solver computes the answer; independent readers of the rendered texts recompute every answer in reasoning-core's tests); nulls are earned (the text mentions a negated, proposed, former or other entity's value, not nothing). The tasks are generated by [reasoning-core](https://github.com/sileod/reasoning-core) (commit `388d64a`, see [provenance.json](provenance.json)) and are a procedural component of the `extraction` config of [tasksource-jev-typed-decisions](https://huggingface.co/datasets/tasksource/tasksource-jev-typed-decisions). | config | what is extracted | |---|---| | `record_field_extraction` | A person's city, employer, job title, phone, email and birth date, from prose about several people with near-miss names; negated, former, hoped-for and relatives' values as confusers; "same city/company as X" chains | | `state_update_extraction` | The value in force (or before the last change) of plan slots, from a timestamped chat of statements, proposals approved/rejected/pending, corrections and undos, out of order from level 2 | | `conditional_list_extraction` | Every order id or product meeting conjunctive, negated or numeric conditions after later updates, or the heaviest such order; prose, bullets or a table | | `log_query_extraction` | Every request id or user of log lines matching filters on level, exact service (auth vs auth-proxy), status, latency and user, or the latest/slowest match; plain, logfmt or JSON lines | | `typed_mention_extraction` | Named-entity style: every mention of each requested type, where one name (Jordan) is a person, place, organization or product by context; companies by a defined current role among former and unrelated relations; codes by a stated format among near-miss strings | | `business_document_extraction` | The value in force on a date in an invoice, purchase order, contract or insurance policy: numbered amendments override printed values and each other, dated windows, schedule references that chain, asked keys left out while their near-miss key is stated (subtotal vs total) | | `nested_structure_extraction` | Path, any-depth and predicate-filter queries on a JSON, YAML or XML configuration whose override layers deep-merge or replace whole blocks | | `html_extraction` | Fields of the main item in raw HTML: scope (nested and related item cards), visibility (hidden, template, struck prices), dt/dd, label-for, attributes and spec tables with rowspan/colspan | | `date_range_extraction` | Every invoice, shipment, contract or ticket whose date of one role (issued vs due) falls in a range, before/after a date, in a month or on a weekday, or the earliest/latest; dates ISO, worded, day/month or month/day numeric under a stated section convention, year-less under a stated year, or relative to another record | | `spec_match_extraction` | Every laptop, e-bike or monitor meeting conjunctive spec requirements, or the best such one; specs and thresholds in mixed exact units (g/kg, GB/TB, min/h, Wh/kWh, in/cm) and a stated number convention (1.234,5), near-miss products failing one requirement, unstated specs not qualifying | | `lookalike_field_extraction` | Fields asked by role (issue vs delivery date, subtotal vs tax, sender vs approver, order vs tracking number, billing vs return address, phones, weights, durations) from a form, sections, table, prose, email, log or YAML-like record; an asked role that is not stated is null although same-typed values of other roles are, or shows a placeholder (pending, N/A); a conditional or policy value of the role (a late fee that may apply) is not the answer | | `structure_lookup_extraction` | A value by its place: a section path (Billing > Contact > Phone) in an outline whose labels recur under other sections, or a cell of one of several same-column tables picked by row and column, a condition on another column or a row position; Markdown, ASCII, CSV, aligned or transposed tables; null when the place exists only elsewhere or the cell is empty | | `relational_span_extraction` | Every mention of an event's direct or indirect causes or effects in a narrative with temporal-only and ruled-out look-alikes, or of what follows from facts and if-then rules (some conjunctive), what triggers an event and what it triggers | Levels 0 to 4 are drawn uniformly; `level` is a column. Mean per-field score by level (0 / 1 / 2 / 3 / 4): | config | train | validation | test | DeepSeek-v4-flash | GLiNER-large | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | `record_field_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 1.00 / 0.96 / 0.81 / 0.72 / 0.62 | 0.80 / 0.59 / 0.36 / 0.45 / 0.38 | | `state_update_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.84 / 0.76 / 0.77 / 0.68 / 0.51 | 0.58 / 0.46 / 0.37 / 0.36 / 0.29 | | `conditional_list_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.88 / 0.79 / 0.70 / 0.64 / 0.52 | 0.29 / 0.17 / 0.12 / 0.05 / 0.10 | | `log_query_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.86 / 0.76 / 0.68 / 0.63 / 0.59 | 0.31 / 0.16 / 0.09 / 0.24 / 0.15 | | `typed_mention_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.85 / 0.80 / 0.79 / 0.69 / 0.66 | 0.40 / 0.42 / 0.49 / 0.34 / 0.39 | | `business_document_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.70 / 0.77 / 0.76 / 0.81 / 0.75 | 0.53 / 0.49 / 0.45 / 0.40 / 0.30 | | `nested_structure_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.93 / 0.88 / 0.94 / 0.86 / 0.86 | 0.18 / 0.20 / 0.20 / 0.20 / 0.18 | | `html_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.98 / 0.96 / 0.94 / 0.98 / 0.90 | 0.35 / 0.31 / 0.30 / 0.27 / 0.39 | | `date_range_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.75 / 0.62 / 0.60 / 0.44 / 0.44 | 0.16 / 0.03 / 0.03 / 0.00 / 0.02 | | `spec_match_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.81 / 0.53 / 0.27 / 0.25 / 0.17 | 0.11 / 0.08 / 0.04 / 0.03 / 0.04 | | `lookalike_field_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.93 / 0.96 / 0.89 / 0.85 / 0.80 | 0.37 / 0.35 / 0.23 / 0.22 / 0.09 | | `structure_lookup_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 1.00 / 0.99 / 0.97 / 0.97 / 0.91 | 0.27 / 0.12 / 0.07 / 0.07 / 0.09 | | `relational_span_extraction` | 10,000 | 500 | 500 | 0.83 / 0.85 / 0.85 / 0.84 / 0.73 | 0.16 / 0.11 / 0.09 / 0.07 / 0.07 | ## Schema `state` (the text), `fields` (`[{name, type, instruction}]`), `answers` (one per field: `{null, values: [{text, start, end}]}`, `state[start:end] == text`), `metadata` (JSON: level, state seed), `level`. ## Citation If you use tasksource, its standardized task annotations, or datasets derived from them in published research, please cite the tasksource paper (Sileo, LREC-COLING 2024). The procedural data is generated with Reasoning Core; please also cite the Reasoning Core paper (Sileo et al., 2026). ```bibtex @inproceedings{sileo-2024-tasksource, title = "tasksource: A Large Collection of {NLP} tasks with a Structured Dataset Preprocessing Framework", author = "Sileo, Damien", booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024)", month = may, year = "2024", address = "Torino, Italia", publisher = "ELRA and ICCL", url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.lrec-main.1361", doi = "10.63317/2h4pkr685mkq", pages = "15655--15684", } @article{sileo2026reasoning, title={Reasoning Core: Designing Broad Procedural Data for Completion-Supervised Reasoning Training}, author={Sileo, Damien and Lacombe, Valentin and Kachler, Dimitri}, journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.05148}, year={2026}, url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.05148} } ```