xinlongHuang commited on
Commit
024f4f0
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): f01e118

Update dataset card: arXiv 2610.29225 link and citation, dashboard link

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +8 -4
README.md CHANGED
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ task_categories:
9
  - text-generation
10
  pretty_name: DiagSafe
11
  tags:
 
12
  - safety
13
  - llm-safety
14
  - red-teaming
@@ -40,7 +41,7 @@ configs:
40
 
41
  **Beyond Binary Labels: Diagnostic Evaluation of LLM Safety with Prompt-Level Rubrics**
42
 
43
- [GitHub](https://github.com/Tencent-Hunyuan/DiagSafe) · [Paper (PDF)](https://github.com/Tencent-Hunyuan/DiagSafe/blob/main/paper/DiagSafe.pdf) · [Evaluation code](https://github.com/Tencent-Hunyuan/DiagSafe#quick-start)
44
 
45
  > **Content warning.** This dataset contains harmful requests (e.g. violence, sexual content, self-harm,
46
  > child safety, CBRN) written to test LLM safety. It is intended for safety evaluation and research only.
@@ -155,7 +156,7 @@ multi-turn judging, checkpointing and grouped statistics.
155
  ## Intended Use and Limitations
156
 
157
  DiagSafe is intended for evaluating and diagnosing the safety behavior of LLMs and LLM judges. The prompts
158
- are deliberately harmful and must not be used to train models to produce harmful content. Results depend
159
  on the judge model; the paper reports rubric-based judging at 89.41%–95.34% agreement with human
160
  annotations across judges.
161
 
@@ -169,10 +170,13 @@ Copyright (C) 2026 Tencent. Released under the
169
  ```bibtex
170
  @misc{diagsafe2026,
171
  title = {Beyond Binary Labels: Diagnostic Evaluation of LLM Safety with Prompt-Level Rubrics},
172
- author = {[Author One] and [Author Two] and [Author Three] and [Author Four]},
 
 
 
173
  year = {2026},
174
  archivePrefix= {arXiv},
175
- eprint = {XXXX.XXXXX},
176
  primaryClass = {cs.CL}
177
  }
178
  ```
 
9
  - text-generation
10
  pretty_name: DiagSafe
11
  tags:
12
+ - arxiv:2610.29225
13
  - safety
14
  - llm-safety
15
  - red-teaming
 
41
 
42
  **Beyond Binary Labels: Diagnostic Evaluation of LLM Safety with Prompt-Level Rubrics**
43
 
44
+ [Paper (arXiv)](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29225) · [GitHub](https://github.com/Tencent-Hunyuan/DiagSafe) · [Evaluation code](https://github.com/Tencent-Hunyuan/DiagSafe#quick-start) · [Dashboard](https://tencent-hunyuan.github.io/DiagSafe/)
45
 
46
  > **Content warning.** This dataset contains harmful requests (e.g. violence, sexual content, self-harm,
47
  > child safety, CBRN) written to test LLM safety. It is intended for safety evaluation and research only.
 
156
  ## Intended Use and Limitations
157
 
158
  DiagSafe is intended for evaluating and diagnosing the safety behavior of LLMs and LLM judges. The prompts
159
+ are deliberately harmful; we ask users not to use them to train models to produce harmful content. Results depend
160
  on the judge model; the paper reports rubric-based judging at 89.41%–95.34% agreement with human
161
  annotations across judges.
162
 
 
170
  ```bibtex
171
  @misc{diagsafe2026,
172
  title = {Beyond Binary Labels: Diagnostic Evaluation of LLM Safety with Prompt-Level Rubrics},
173
+ author = {Li, Hongyu and Huang, Xinlong and Yu, Zhan and Zhao, Jing and Zhao, Zhe and
174
+ Zhong, Juntao and Kuang, Xiong and Yuan, Rui and Yan, ZhenXiang and Xu, Huilin and
175
+ Yu, Haitao and Wang, Lilin and Chen, Rui and Chen, Blaze and Lian, Fengzong and
176
+ Hu, Renfen},
177
  year = {2026},
178
  archivePrefix= {arXiv},
179
+ eprint = {2610.29225},
180
  primaryClass = {cs.CL}
181
  }
182
  ```