---
pretty_name: Opendoor Financial Event Knowledge Graph — pipeline data
license: other
license_name: mixed-see-card
language:
  - en
tags:
  - finance
  - sec-edgar
  - knowledge-graph
  - information-extraction
  - evidence-linking
size_categories:
  - 10K<n<100K
viewer: false
---

# Opendoor Financial Event Knowledge Graph — pipeline data

The gitignored `data/` tree of the `Prototyping-Financial-Knowlege-Graph` repository, published
so a second machine can regenerate the graph without re-fetching EDGAR.

**This dataset is the data half only.** The code, configuration, ontology and recorded
provider answers live in the repository. Read [Reproducing the graph](#reproducing-the-graph)
before use — at the commit this snapshot was taken from, the repository alone **cannot**
project this run, and the reason is recorded below rather than left to be discovered.

Anchor company: **Opendoor Technologies Inc.** (CIK `0001801169`, Nasdaq: OPEN). Source:
SEC EDGAR.

## What is here

994.5 MiB across 2,755 files (`1,042,852,388` bytes). Every path keeps its repository-relative
name, so downloading into the repository root puts each file where the pipeline expects it.

| Path | Size | Contents | Role |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| `data/raw/sec/` | 746 MB | 2,128 files — SEC source bytes, original filenames, per-filing `_filing.json` | Input to normalization |
| `data/normalized/sec/` | 105 MB | 588 files — per-document JSON + passages JSONL | Input to extraction |
| `data/normalization_catalog/` | 41 MB | `passages.jsonl`, `documents.jsonl`, `selection.jsonl`, `issues.jsonl` | **Input to the graph** |
| `data/extraction_runs/extract-v1-lexical-7f72d6172630/` | 33 MB | 7 catalogs + `manifest.json` + `lane_outputs.jsonl` + `report.md` + `run.complete` | **Input to the graph** |
| `data/graph_runs/graph-v1-eeba753149e9/` | 74 MB | `nodes.jsonl`, `edges.jsonl`, `manifest.json` | Graph output — for Neo4j load and byte-comparison |
| `data/catalog/` | 1.9 MB | `filings.jsonl`, `artifacts.jsonl` | Derived acquisition index |
| `data/normalization_reports/`, `data/normalization_runs/`, `data/reports/`, `data/runs/` | 1.4 MB | Per-run reports and issue files | Diagnostics |
| `provenance/ontology_definitions/` | 88 KB | All 12 ontology YAML files as they were when the run was produced | See [Reproducing the graph](#reproducing-the-graph) |
| `provenance/CODE_STATE.txt` | 4 KB | Commit, branch, and the uncommitted-file list at snapshot time | Provenance |
| `MANIFEST.sha256` | 250 KB | `sha256  size  path` for all 2,755 files, sorted by path | Transfer verification |

`data/` is only two files away from being the graph's whole input: `graph.core.inputs.load_run`
opens the extraction run directory and `normalization_catalog/{passages,documents}.jsonl`, and
nothing else. Everything above those two rows exists so earlier stages can be replayed.

### Deliberately excluded

| Excluded | Size | Why |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `data/superseded_runs/extract-v1-lexical-2422c4252c07/` | 33 MB | Superseded extraction run |
| `data/graph_runs/graph-v1-886059d862ce/` | 74 MB | Projected from that superseded run (projection 1.1.0) |
| `.env` | — | Local Neo4j password. `.env.example` is in the repository |

`data/` was scanned for credential patterns before upload; the only provider record in any
manifest is a local model filename (`Qwen3.5-9B-Q4_K_M.gguf`) with `provider_calls_permitted: 0`.

## Corpus and run facts

All values below are read from the shipped manifests, not restated from repository docs.

| Layer | Measured |
| --- | --- |
| Acquisition | 109 filings, 2,019 artifacts |
| Normalization | 294 documents, 12,442 passages (1,935 table); `corpus_id 294d-12442p-9992c4eb1888` |
| Extraction | run `extract-v1-lexical-7f72d6172630`, created 2026-08-03T13:33:47Z |
| — candidates | 11,848 (153 yielded a claim, 11,695 did not) |
| — claims / observations | 2,714 / 2,704 |
| — events / relationships | 6 / 4 |
| — issues / rejected claims | 17,130 / 49 |
| Graph | run `graph-v1-eeba753149e9`, projection `1.2.0`, created 2026-08-03T13:34:46Z |
| — nodes | 28,836 — Issue 17,127, Passage 8,776, Observation 2,704, Document 185, Metric 26, Entity 9, Event 6 |
| — edges | 35,600 — FOUND_IN 17,130, PART_OF 8,776, EVIDENCED_BY 2,710, HAS_OBSERVATION 2,704, OBSERVATION_OF_SUBJECT 2,704, CONCERNS_METRIC 1,523, DISTINCT_FROM 36, PARTICIPATES_IN 10, others 7 |

Ontology: `real_estate_marketplace_v1`, `definition_hash 337e0e59534da0d2eb3235152af3d48f0510cdb391feed27956a4e80b0858af2`.
Extraction code commit: `c59818e4a775103c94f3438306c051b66ef54387`.

The extraction run replays 15 recorded provider answers rather than calling a model
(`mode: replay_only`). The answers are committed in the repository at
`benchmarks/extraction/v1/answers/`, so extraction is reproducible offline — no API key, no
model download.

## Getting the data

The repository is private, so a read token is required
(https://huggingface.co/settings/tokens).

```bash
pip install huggingface_hub
hf auth login                     # paste a read token

cd /path/to/Prototyping-Financial-Knowlege-Graph
hf download thelets/opendoor-knowledge-graph --repo-type=dataset --local-dir .
```

`--local-dir .` writes `data/...` directly into the repository root, which is where
`config/*.yaml` expects it. `provenance/`, `README.md` and `MANIFEST.sha256` land beside it and
are not read by any pipeline stage.

### Verify the transfer

```bash
sha256sum -c MANIFEST.sha256
```

2,755 lines, all `OK`. The manifest is independent of the per-run manifests, which carry their
own `catalog_digests` — checking both proves the run is internally consistent *and* that it
arrived whole.

## Reproducing the graph

**The graph projection will refuse to run against a clean clone of commit `c59818e`.** This is
a measured fact, not a caution:

`graph/core/manifest.py:171` compares the loaded ontology's `definition_hash` against the one
the extraction run recorded and raises `GraphInputError` — *"the vocabulary changed under a
finalized run"* — when they differ. They differ:

| Ontology source | `definition_hash` |
| --- | --- |
| The tree that produced this run | `337e0e59…` (what `manifest.json` records) |
| Commit `c59818e` as committed | `e8d4af70…` |

The run was produced from a working tree carrying uncommitted changes to
`ontology/versions/real_estate_marketplace_v1/definitions/{claims,constraints,events}.yaml`
(+80 lines) and to `graph/core/models.py`, where `GRAPH_PROJECTION_VERSION` is `1.2.0`
uncommitted against `1.1.0` at `c59818e`. Since the graph run id derives from
`(projection_version, extraction_run_id, ontology_definition_hash)`
(`graph/core/manifest.py:137`), a clean clone would compute a different run id even if the
hash gate were passed.

Two ways forward:

1. **Preferred — publish the code.** Commit and push branch
   `impl/f0-factual-spine-contracts`, then check it out on the second machine. The ontology
   YAML and the projection-version bump travel with it, both discrepancies disappear, and
   `graph-v1-eeba753149e9` reprojects byte-for-byte.
2. **Interim.** `provenance/ontology_definitions/` holds all 12 definition YAML files as they
   were when the run was produced — the hash covers the whole directory, so the full set ships
   rather than only the three that changed. Copying them over
   `ontology/versions/real_estate_marketplace_v1/definitions/` restores
   `definition_hash 337e0e59…` and satisfies the gate. This does **not** restore the
   `GRAPH_PROJECTION_VERSION` bump, so the projection succeeds but mints a run id that is not
   `graph-v1-eeba753149e9`. Use it to read the shipped graph, not to claim reproduction.

Loading the shipped `nodes.jsonl` / `edges.jsonl` into Neo4j needs neither workaround — that
output is already projected.

## Provenance and licensing

Source documents are SEC EDGAR filings by Opendoor Technologies Inc., retrieved 2026-07-31.
US government edicts and EDGAR submissions are not subject to copyright in the United States;
the filings themselves are public disclosure. Raw bytes and original filenames are preserved
exactly, and every artifact carries a hash, a source URL and a fetch timestamp.

The derived layers — normalized passages, extraction catalogs, the ontology, and the projected
graph — are the work of this project. `license: other` is declared because the archive mixes
public-source documents with project-authored derivations rather than because any part is
restricted.

Extraction is imperfect by construction: this run holds 17,130 issues and 49 rejected claims,
and `rejected_claims.jsonl` carries **pre-validation model output** that was refused. Nothing
in `rejected_claims.jsonl` should be read as fact. None of this is investment advice.