[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was that total debt in 2014?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the total debt from 2014 to 2015?
[Turn 2] and what was that total debt in 2014?

Pre-table text:
in addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs .
these credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries .
borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 .
commercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .
and in europe .
at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding .
effective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s .
was increased by $ 2.0 billion .
as a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .
and in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion .
we expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements .
sale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions .
these arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse .
the trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets .
we sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing .
pmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions .
the trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively .
the net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows .
for further details , see item 8 , note 23 .
sale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements .
debt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 .
our total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature .
for further details , see item 8 , note 7 .
indebtedness .
the weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 .
see item 8 , note 16 .
fair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt .
the amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors .
on february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s .
securities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period .
our debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s .
dollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s .
dollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 .
the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .
the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 .
2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .

Table:
type		face value	interest rate	issuance	maturity
u.s . dollar notes	( a )	$ 500	1.250% ( 1.250 % )	august 2015	august 2017
u.s . dollar notes	( a )	$ 750	3.375% ( 3.375 % )	august 2015	august 2025

Post-table text:
in addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs .
these credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries .
borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 .
commercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .
and in europe .
at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding .
effective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s .
was increased by $ 2.0 billion .
as a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .
and in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion .
we expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements .
sale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions .
these arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse .
the trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets .
we sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing .
pmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions .
the trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively .
the net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows .
for further details , see item 8 , note 23 .
sale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements .
debt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 .
our total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature .
for further details , see item 8 , note 7 .
indebtedness .
the weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 .
see item 8 , note 16 .
fair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt .
the amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors .
on february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s .
securities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period .
our debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s .
dollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s .
dollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 .
the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .
the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 .
2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what percentage, then, did that change represent in relation to this 2014 amount?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the total debt from 2014 to 2015?
[Turn 2] and what was that total debt in 2014?
[Turn 3] what percentage, then, did that change represent in relation to this 2014 amount?

Pre-table text:
in addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs .
these credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries .
borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 .
commercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .
and in europe .
at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding .
effective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s .
was increased by $ 2.0 billion .
as a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .
and in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion .
we expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements .
sale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions .
these arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse .
the trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets .
we sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing .
pmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions .
the trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively .
the net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows .
for further details , see item 8 , note 23 .
sale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements .
debt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 .
our total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature .
for further details , see item 8 , note 7 .
indebtedness .
the weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 .
see item 8 , note 16 .
fair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt .
the amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors .
on february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s .
securities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period .
our debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s .
dollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s .
dollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 .
the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .
the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 .
2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .

Table:
type		face value	interest rate	issuance	maturity
u.s . dollar notes	( a )	$ 500	1.250% ( 1.250 % )	august 2015	august 2017
u.s . dollar notes	( a )	$ 750	3.375% ( 3.375 % )	august 2015	august 2025

Post-table text:
in addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs .
these credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries .
borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 .
commercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .
and in europe .
at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding .
effective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s .
was increased by $ 2.0 billion .
as a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .
and in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion .
we expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements .
sale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions .
these arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse .
the trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets .
we sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing .
pmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions .
the trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively .
the net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows .
for further details , see item 8 , note 23 .
sale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements .
debt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 .
our total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature .
for further details , see item 8 , note 7 .
indebtedness .
the weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 .
see item 8 , note 16 .
fair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt .
the amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors .
on february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s .
securities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period .
our debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s .
dollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s .
dollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 .
the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .
the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 .
2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
between those two years, what was, again, the variance in that total debt, in billions?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the total debt from 2014 to 2015?
[Turn 2] and what was that total debt in 2014?
[Turn 3] what percentage, then, did that change represent in relation to this 2014 amount?
[Turn 4] between those two years, what was, again, the variance in that total debt, in billions?

Pre-table text:
in addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs .
these credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries .
borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 .
commercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .
and in europe .
at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding .
effective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s .
was increased by $ 2.0 billion .
as a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .
and in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion .
we expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements .
sale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions .
these arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse .
the trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets .
we sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing .
pmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions .
the trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively .
the net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows .
for further details , see item 8 , note 23 .
sale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements .
debt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 .
our total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature .
for further details , see item 8 , note 7 .
indebtedness .
the weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 .
see item 8 , note 16 .
fair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt .
the amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors .
on february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s .
securities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period .
our debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s .
dollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s .
dollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 .
the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .
the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 .
2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .

Table:
type		face value	interest rate	issuance	maturity
u.s . dollar notes	( a )	$ 500	1.250% ( 1.250 % )	august 2015	august 2017
u.s . dollar notes	( a )	$ 750	3.375% ( 3.375 % )	august 2015	august 2025

Post-table text:
in addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs .
these credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries .
borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 .
commercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .
and in europe .
at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding .
effective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s .
was increased by $ 2.0 billion .
as a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .
and in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion .
we expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements .
sale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions .
these arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse .
the trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets .
we sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing .
pmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions .
the trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively .
the net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows .
for further details , see item 8 , note 23 .
sale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements .
debt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 .
our total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature .
for further details , see item 8 , note 7 .
indebtedness .
the weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 .
see item 8 , note 16 .
fair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt .
the amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors .
on february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s .
securities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period .
our debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s .
dollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s .
dollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 .
the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .
the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 .
2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the price performance of the pmi in 2014?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the price performance of the pmi in 2014?

Pre-table text:
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .
the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .
date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

Table:
date	pmi	pmi peer group ( 1 )	s&p 500 index
december 31 2013	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
december 31 2014	$ 97.90	$ 107.80	$ 113.70
december 31 2015	$ 111.00	$ 116.80	$ 115.30
december 31 2016	$ 120.50	$ 118.40	$ 129.00
december 31 2017	$ 144.50	$ 140.50	$ 157.20
december 31 2018	$ 96.50	$ 127.70	$ 150.30

Post-table text:
( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year .
the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .
the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .
as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .
note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and by what amount did it change since 2013?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the price performance of the pmi in 2014?
[Turn 2] and by what amount did it change since 2013?

Pre-table text:
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .
the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .
date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

Table:
date	pmi	pmi peer group ( 1 )	s&p 500 index
december 31 2013	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
december 31 2014	$ 97.90	$ 107.80	$ 113.70
december 31 2015	$ 111.00	$ 116.80	$ 115.30
december 31 2016	$ 120.50	$ 118.40	$ 129.00
december 31 2017	$ 144.50	$ 140.50	$ 157.20
december 31 2018	$ 96.50	$ 127.70	$ 150.30

Post-table text:
( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year .
the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .
the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .
as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .
note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is this amount as a portion of that price in 2013?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the price performance of the pmi in 2014?
[Turn 2] and by what amount did it change since 2013?
[Turn 3] what is this amount as a portion of that price in 2013?

Pre-table text:
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .
the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .
date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

Table:
date	pmi	pmi peer group ( 1 )	s&p 500 index
december 31 2013	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
december 31 2014	$ 97.90	$ 107.80	$ 113.70
december 31 2015	$ 111.00	$ 116.80	$ 115.30
december 31 2016	$ 120.50	$ 118.40	$ 129.00
december 31 2017	$ 144.50	$ 140.50	$ 157.20
december 31 2018	$ 96.50	$ 127.70	$ 150.30

Post-table text:
( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year .
the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .
the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .
as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .
note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was the change in the performance price of that stock for the full five years shown in the chart?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the price performance of the pmi in 2014?
[Turn 2] and by what amount did it change since 2013?
[Turn 3] what is this amount as a portion of that price in 2013?
[Turn 4] and what was the change in the performance price of that stock for the full five years shown in the chart?

Pre-table text:
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .
the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .
date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

Table:
date	pmi	pmi peer group ( 1 )	s&p 500 index
december 31 2013	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
december 31 2014	$ 97.90	$ 107.80	$ 113.70
december 31 2015	$ 111.00	$ 116.80	$ 115.30
december 31 2016	$ 120.50	$ 118.40	$ 129.00
december 31 2017	$ 144.50	$ 140.50	$ 157.20
december 31 2018	$ 96.50	$ 127.70	$ 150.30

Post-table text:
( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year .
the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .
the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .
as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .
note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is this five year change as a percent of the 2013 price?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the price performance of the pmi in 2014?
[Turn 2] and by what amount did it change since 2013?
[Turn 3] what is this amount as a portion of that price in 2013?
[Turn 4] and what was the change in the performance price of that stock for the full five years shown in the chart?
[Turn 5] what is this five year change as a percent of the 2013 price?

Pre-table text:
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .
the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .
date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

Table:
date	pmi	pmi peer group ( 1 )	s&p 500 index
december 31 2013	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
december 31 2014	$ 97.90	$ 107.80	$ 113.70
december 31 2015	$ 111.00	$ 116.80	$ 115.30
december 31 2016	$ 120.50	$ 118.40	$ 129.00
december 31 2017	$ 144.50	$ 140.50	$ 157.20
december 31 2018	$ 96.50	$ 127.70	$ 150.30

Post-table text:
( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year .
the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .
the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .
as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .
note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and in this same period, what was that change for the s&p 500 index?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the price performance of the pmi in 2014?
[Turn 2] and by what amount did it change since 2013?
[Turn 3] what is this amount as a portion of that price in 2013?
[Turn 4] and what was the change in the performance price of that stock for the full five years shown in the chart?
[Turn 5] what is this five year change as a percent of the 2013 price?
[Turn 6] and in this same period, what was that change for the s&p 500 index?

Pre-table text:
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .
the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .
date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

Table:
date	pmi	pmi peer group ( 1 )	s&p 500 index
december 31 2013	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
december 31 2014	$ 97.90	$ 107.80	$ 113.70
december 31 2015	$ 111.00	$ 116.80	$ 115.30
december 31 2016	$ 120.50	$ 118.40	$ 129.00
december 31 2017	$ 144.50	$ 140.50	$ 157.20
december 31 2018	$ 96.50	$ 127.70	$ 150.30

Post-table text:
( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year .
the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .
the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .
as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .
note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was this s&p 500 index change as a percentage of its price performance in 2013?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the price performance of the pmi in 2014?
[Turn 2] and by what amount did it change since 2013?
[Turn 3] what is this amount as a portion of that price in 2013?
[Turn 4] and what was the change in the performance price of that stock for the full five years shown in the chart?
[Turn 5] what is this five year change as a percent of the 2013 price?
[Turn 6] and in this same period, what was that change for the s&p 500 index?
[Turn 7] and what was this s&p 500 index change as a percentage of its price performance in 2013?

Pre-table text:
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .
the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .
date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

Table:
date	pmi	pmi peer group ( 1 )	s&p 500 index
december 31 2013	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
december 31 2014	$ 97.90	$ 107.80	$ 113.70
december 31 2015	$ 111.00	$ 116.80	$ 115.30
december 31 2016	$ 120.50	$ 118.40	$ 129.00
december 31 2017	$ 144.50	$ 140.50	$ 157.20
december 31 2018	$ 96.50	$ 127.70	$ 150.30

Post-table text:
( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year .
the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .
the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .
as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .
note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is, then, the difference between the pmi percentage and this s&p 500 index one for the five years?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the price performance of the pmi in 2014?
[Turn 2] and by what amount did it change since 2013?
[Turn 3] what is this amount as a portion of that price in 2013?
[Turn 4] and what was the change in the performance price of that stock for the full five years shown in the chart?
[Turn 5] what is this five year change as a percent of the 2013 price?
[Turn 6] and in this same period, what was that change for the s&p 500 index?
[Turn 7] and what was this s&p 500 index change as a percentage of its price performance in 2013?
[Turn 8] what is, then, the difference between the pmi percentage and this s&p 500 index one for the five years?

Pre-table text:
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .
the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .
date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

Table:
date	pmi	pmi peer group ( 1 )	s&p 500 index
december 31 2013	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
december 31 2014	$ 97.90	$ 107.80	$ 113.70
december 31 2015	$ 111.00	$ 116.80	$ 115.30
december 31 2016	$ 120.50	$ 118.40	$ 129.00
december 31 2017	$ 144.50	$ 140.50	$ 157.20
december 31 2018	$ 96.50	$ 127.70	$ 150.30

Post-table text:
( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year .
the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .
the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .
as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .
note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was revenue in 2013?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was revenue in 2013?

Pre-table text:
table of contents notes to consolidated financial statements of american airlines group inc .
information generated by market transactions involving comparable assets , as well as pricing guides and other sources .
the current market for the aircraft , the maintenance condition of the aircraft and the expected proceeds from the sale of the assets , among other factors , were considered .
the market approach was utilized to value certain intangible assets such as airport take off and landing slots when sufficient market information was available .
the income approach was primarily used to value intangible assets , including customer relationships , marketing agreements , certain international route authorities , and the us airways tradename .
the income approach indicates value for a subject asset based on the present value of cash flows projected to be generated by the asset .
projected cash flows are discounted at a required market rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money .
the cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for certain assets for which the market and income approaches could not be applied due to the nature of the asset .
the cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost for the asset , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation .
the fair value of us airways 2019 dividend miles loyalty program liability was determined based on the weighted average equivalent ticket value of outstanding miles which were expected to be redeemed for future travel at december 9 , 2013 .
the weighted average equivalent ticket value contemplates differing classes of service , domestic and international itineraries and the carrier providing the award travel .
pro-forma impact of the merger the company 2019s unaudited pro-forma results presented below include the effects of the merger as if it had been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 .
the pro-forma results include the depreciation and amortization associated with the acquired tangible and intangible assets , lease and debt fair value adjustments , the elimination of any deferred gains or losses , adjustments relating to reflecting the fair value of the loyalty program liability and the impact of income changes on profit sharing expense , among others .
in addition , the pro-forma results below reflect the impact of higher wage rates related to memorandums of understanding with us airways 2019 pilots that became effective upon closing of the merger , as well as the elimination of the company 2019s reorganization items , net and merger transition costs .
however , the pro-forma results do not include any anticipated synergies or other expected benefits of the merger .
accordingly , the unaudited pro-forma financial information below is not necessarily indicative of either future results of operations or results that might have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 .
december 31 , ( in millions ) .

Table:
	december 31 2013 ( in millions )
revenue	$ 40678
net income	2526

Post-table text:
5 .
basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies ( a ) basis of presentation the consolidated financial statements for the full years of 2015 and 2014 and the period from december 9 , 2013 to december 31 , 2013 include the accounts of the company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries .
for the periods prior to december 9 , 2013 , the consolidated financial statements do not include the accounts of us airways group .
all significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated .
the preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities , revenues and expenses , and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements .
actual results could differ from those estimates .
the most significant areas .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was net income?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was revenue in 2013?
[Turn 2] what was net income?

Pre-table text:
table of contents notes to consolidated financial statements of american airlines group inc .
information generated by market transactions involving comparable assets , as well as pricing guides and other sources .
the current market for the aircraft , the maintenance condition of the aircraft and the expected proceeds from the sale of the assets , among other factors , were considered .
the market approach was utilized to value certain intangible assets such as airport take off and landing slots when sufficient market information was available .
the income approach was primarily used to value intangible assets , including customer relationships , marketing agreements , certain international route authorities , and the us airways tradename .
the income approach indicates value for a subject asset based on the present value of cash flows projected to be generated by the asset .
projected cash flows are discounted at a required market rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money .
the cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for certain assets for which the market and income approaches could not be applied due to the nature of the asset .
the cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost for the asset , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation .
the fair value of us airways 2019 dividend miles loyalty program liability was determined based on the weighted average equivalent ticket value of outstanding miles which were expected to be redeemed for future travel at december 9 , 2013 .
the weighted average equivalent ticket value contemplates differing classes of service , domestic and international itineraries and the carrier providing the award travel .
pro-forma impact of the merger the company 2019s unaudited pro-forma results presented below include the effects of the merger as if it had been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 .
the pro-forma results include the depreciation and amortization associated with the acquired tangible and intangible assets , lease and debt fair value adjustments , the elimination of any deferred gains or losses , adjustments relating to reflecting the fair value of the loyalty program liability and the impact of income changes on profit sharing expense , among others .
in addition , the pro-forma results below reflect the impact of higher wage rates related to memorandums of understanding with us airways 2019 pilots that became effective upon closing of the merger , as well as the elimination of the company 2019s reorganization items , net and merger transition costs .
however , the pro-forma results do not include any anticipated synergies or other expected benefits of the merger .
accordingly , the unaudited pro-forma financial information below is not necessarily indicative of either future results of operations or results that might have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 .
december 31 , ( in millions ) .

Table:
	december 31 2013 ( in millions )
revenue	$ 40678
net income	2526

Post-table text:
5 .
basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies ( a ) basis of presentation the consolidated financial statements for the full years of 2015 and 2014 and the period from december 9 , 2013 to december 31 , 2013 include the accounts of the company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries .
for the periods prior to december 9 , 2013 , the consolidated financial statements do not include the accounts of us airways group .
all significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated .
the preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities , revenues and expenses , and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements .
actual results could differ from those estimates .
the most significant areas .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is revenue less net income?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was revenue in 2013?
[Turn 2] what was net income?
[Turn 3] what is revenue less net income?

Pre-table text:
table of contents notes to consolidated financial statements of american airlines group inc .
information generated by market transactions involving comparable assets , as well as pricing guides and other sources .
the current market for the aircraft , the maintenance condition of the aircraft and the expected proceeds from the sale of the assets , among other factors , were considered .
the market approach was utilized to value certain intangible assets such as airport take off and landing slots when sufficient market information was available .
the income approach was primarily used to value intangible assets , including customer relationships , marketing agreements , certain international route authorities , and the us airways tradename .
the income approach indicates value for a subject asset based on the present value of cash flows projected to be generated by the asset .
projected cash flows are discounted at a required market rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money .
the cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for certain assets for which the market and income approaches could not be applied due to the nature of the asset .
the cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost for the asset , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation .
the fair value of us airways 2019 dividend miles loyalty program liability was determined based on the weighted average equivalent ticket value of outstanding miles which were expected to be redeemed for future travel at december 9 , 2013 .
the weighted average equivalent ticket value contemplates differing classes of service , domestic and international itineraries and the carrier providing the award travel .
pro-forma impact of the merger the company 2019s unaudited pro-forma results presented below include the effects of the merger as if it had been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 .
the pro-forma results include the depreciation and amortization associated with the acquired tangible and intangible assets , lease and debt fair value adjustments , the elimination of any deferred gains or losses , adjustments relating to reflecting the fair value of the loyalty program liability and the impact of income changes on profit sharing expense , among others .
in addition , the pro-forma results below reflect the impact of higher wage rates related to memorandums of understanding with us airways 2019 pilots that became effective upon closing of the merger , as well as the elimination of the company 2019s reorganization items , net and merger transition costs .
however , the pro-forma results do not include any anticipated synergies or other expected benefits of the merger .
accordingly , the unaudited pro-forma financial information below is not necessarily indicative of either future results of operations or results that might have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 .
december 31 , ( in millions ) .

Table:
	december 31 2013 ( in millions )
revenue	$ 40678
net income	2526

Post-table text:
5 .
basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies ( a ) basis of presentation the consolidated financial statements for the full years of 2015 and 2014 and the period from december 9 , 2013 to december 31 , 2013 include the accounts of the company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries .
for the periods prior to december 9 , 2013 , the consolidated financial statements do not include the accounts of us airways group .
all significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated .
the preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities , revenues and expenses , and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements .
actual results could differ from those estimates .
the most significant areas .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was 2013 revenue?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was revenue in 2013?
[Turn 2] what was net income?
[Turn 3] what is revenue less net income?
[Turn 4] what was 2013 revenue?

Pre-table text:
table of contents notes to consolidated financial statements of american airlines group inc .
information generated by market transactions involving comparable assets , as well as pricing guides and other sources .
the current market for the aircraft , the maintenance condition of the aircraft and the expected proceeds from the sale of the assets , among other factors , were considered .
the market approach was utilized to value certain intangible assets such as airport take off and landing slots when sufficient market information was available .
the income approach was primarily used to value intangible assets , including customer relationships , marketing agreements , certain international route authorities , and the us airways tradename .
the income approach indicates value for a subject asset based on the present value of cash flows projected to be generated by the asset .
projected cash flows are discounted at a required market rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money .
the cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for certain assets for which the market and income approaches could not be applied due to the nature of the asset .
the cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost for the asset , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation .
the fair value of us airways 2019 dividend miles loyalty program liability was determined based on the weighted average equivalent ticket value of outstanding miles which were expected to be redeemed for future travel at december 9 , 2013 .
the weighted average equivalent ticket value contemplates differing classes of service , domestic and international itineraries and the carrier providing the award travel .
pro-forma impact of the merger the company 2019s unaudited pro-forma results presented below include the effects of the merger as if it had been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 .
the pro-forma results include the depreciation and amortization associated with the acquired tangible and intangible assets , lease and debt fair value adjustments , the elimination of any deferred gains or losses , adjustments relating to reflecting the fair value of the loyalty program liability and the impact of income changes on profit sharing expense , among others .
in addition , the pro-forma results below reflect the impact of higher wage rates related to memorandums of understanding with us airways 2019 pilots that became effective upon closing of the merger , as well as the elimination of the company 2019s reorganization items , net and merger transition costs .
however , the pro-forma results do not include any anticipated synergies or other expected benefits of the merger .
accordingly , the unaudited pro-forma financial information below is not necessarily indicative of either future results of operations or results that might have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 .
december 31 , ( in millions ) .

Table:
	december 31 2013 ( in millions )
revenue	$ 40678
net income	2526

Post-table text:
5 .
basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies ( a ) basis of presentation the consolidated financial statements for the full years of 2015 and 2014 and the period from december 9 , 2013 to december 31 , 2013 include the accounts of the company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries .
for the periods prior to december 9 , 2013 , the consolidated financial statements do not include the accounts of us airways group .
all significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated .
the preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities , revenues and expenses , and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements .
actual results could differ from those estimates .
the most significant areas .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the difference of revenue less net income over the 2013 revenue value?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was revenue in 2013?
[Turn 2] what was net income?
[Turn 3] what is revenue less net income?
[Turn 4] what was 2013 revenue?
[Turn 5] what is the difference of revenue less net income over the 2013 revenue value?

Pre-table text:
table of contents notes to consolidated financial statements of american airlines group inc .
information generated by market transactions involving comparable assets , as well as pricing guides and other sources .
the current market for the aircraft , the maintenance condition of the aircraft and the expected proceeds from the sale of the assets , among other factors , were considered .
the market approach was utilized to value certain intangible assets such as airport take off and landing slots when sufficient market information was available .
the income approach was primarily used to value intangible assets , including customer relationships , marketing agreements , certain international route authorities , and the us airways tradename .
the income approach indicates value for a subject asset based on the present value of cash flows projected to be generated by the asset .
projected cash flows are discounted at a required market rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money .
the cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for certain assets for which the market and income approaches could not be applied due to the nature of the asset .
the cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost for the asset , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation .
the fair value of us airways 2019 dividend miles loyalty program liability was determined based on the weighted average equivalent ticket value of outstanding miles which were expected to be redeemed for future travel at december 9 , 2013 .
the weighted average equivalent ticket value contemplates differing classes of service , domestic and international itineraries and the carrier providing the award travel .
pro-forma impact of the merger the company 2019s unaudited pro-forma results presented below include the effects of the merger as if it had been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 .
the pro-forma results include the depreciation and amortization associated with the acquired tangible and intangible assets , lease and debt fair value adjustments , the elimination of any deferred gains or losses , adjustments relating to reflecting the fair value of the loyalty program liability and the impact of income changes on profit sharing expense , among others .
in addition , the pro-forma results below reflect the impact of higher wage rates related to memorandums of understanding with us airways 2019 pilots that became effective upon closing of the merger , as well as the elimination of the company 2019s reorganization items , net and merger transition costs .
however , the pro-forma results do not include any anticipated synergies or other expected benefits of the merger .
accordingly , the unaudited pro-forma financial information below is not necessarily indicative of either future results of operations or results that might have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 .
december 31 , ( in millions ) .

Table:
	december 31 2013 ( in millions )
revenue	$ 40678
net income	2526

Post-table text:
5 .
basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies ( a ) basis of presentation the consolidated financial statements for the full years of 2015 and 2014 and the period from december 9 , 2013 to december 31 , 2013 include the accounts of the company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries .
for the periods prior to december 9 , 2013 , the consolidated financial statements do not include the accounts of us airways group .
all significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated .
the preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities , revenues and expenses , and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements .
actual results could differ from those estimates .
the most significant areas .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the change in the balance from the start of 2010 to the end of 2012?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the balance from the start of 2010 to the end of 2012?

Pre-table text:
19 .
income taxes ( continued ) capital loss carryforwards of $ 69 million and $ 90 million , which were acquired in the bgi transaction and will expire on or before 2013 .
at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had $ 95 million and $ 95 million of valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets , respectively , recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition .
the year- over-year increase in the valuation allowance primarily related to certain foreign deferred income tax assets .
goodwill recorded in connection with the quellos transaction has been reduced during the period by the amount of tax benefit realized from tax-deductible goodwill .
see note 9 , goodwill , for further discussion .
current income taxes are recorded net in the consolidated statements of financial condition when related to the same tax jurisdiction .
as of december 31 , 2012 , the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $ 102 million and $ 121 million , respectively , recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities , respectively .
as of december 31 , 2011 , the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $ 108 million and $ 102 million , respectively , recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities , respectively .
the company does not provide deferred taxes on the excess of the financial reporting over tax basis on its investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration .
the excess totaled $ 2125 million and $ 1516 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .
the determination of the additional deferred income taxes on the excess has not been provided because it is not practicable due to the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation .
the following tabular reconciliation presents the total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits : year ended december 31 , ( dollar amounts in millions ) 2012 2011 2010 .

Table:
( dollar amounts in millions )	year ended december 31 , 2012	year ended december 31 , 2011	year ended december 31 , 2010
balance at january 1	$ 349	$ 307	$ 285
additions for tax positions of prior years	4	22	10
reductions for tax positions of prior years	-1 ( 1 )	-1 ( 1 )	-17 ( 17 )
additions based on tax positions related to current year	69	46	35
lapse of statute of limitations	2014	2014	-8 ( 8 )
settlements	-29 ( 29 )	-25 ( 25 )	-2 ( 2 )
positions assumed in acquisitions	12	2014	4
balance at december 31	$ 404	$ 349	$ 307

Post-table text:
included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , are $ 250 million , $ 226 million and $ 194 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate .
the company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expense .
related to the unrecognized tax benefits noted above , the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 3 million during 2012 and in total , as of december 31 , 2012 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 69 million .
the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 10 million during 2011 and in total , as of december 31 , 2011 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 66 million .
the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 8 million during 2010 and in total , as of december 31 , 2010 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 56 million .
pursuant to the amended and restated stock purchase agreement , the company has been indemnified by barclays for $ 73 million and guggenheim for $ 6 million of unrecognized tax benefits .
blackrock is subject to u.s .
federal income tax , state and local income tax , and foreign income tax in multiple jurisdictions .
tax years after 2007 remain open to u.s .
federal income tax examination , tax years after 2005 remain open to state and local income tax examination , and tax years after 2006 remain open to income tax examination in the united kingdom .
with few exceptions , as of december 31 , 2012 , the company is no longer subject to u.s .
federal , state , local or foreign examinations by tax authorities for years before 2006 .
the internal revenue service ( 201cirs 201d ) completed its examination of blackrock 2019s 2006 and 2007 tax years in march 2011 .
in november 2011 , the irs commenced its examination of blackrock 2019s 2008 and 2009 tax years , and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined , it is not expected to be material .
in july 2011 , the irs commenced its federal income tax audit of the bgi group , which blackrock acquired in december 2009 .
the tax years under examination are 2007 through december 1 , 2009 , and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined , it is not expected to be material .
the company is currently under audit in several state and local jurisdictions .
the significant state and local income tax examinations are in california for tax years 2004 through 2006 , new york city for tax years 2007 through 2008 , and new jersey for tax years 2003 through 2009 .
no state and local income tax audits cover years earlier than 2007 except for california , new jersey and new york city .
no state and local income tax audits are expected to result in an assessment material to the consolidated financial statements. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was the increase in 2010 on the positions assumed in acquisitions?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the balance from the start of 2010 to the end of 2012?
[Turn 2] and what was the increase in 2010 on the positions assumed in acquisitions?

Pre-table text:
19 .
income taxes ( continued ) capital loss carryforwards of $ 69 million and $ 90 million , which were acquired in the bgi transaction and will expire on or before 2013 .
at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had $ 95 million and $ 95 million of valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets , respectively , recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition .
the year- over-year increase in the valuation allowance primarily related to certain foreign deferred income tax assets .
goodwill recorded in connection with the quellos transaction has been reduced during the period by the amount of tax benefit realized from tax-deductible goodwill .
see note 9 , goodwill , for further discussion .
current income taxes are recorded net in the consolidated statements of financial condition when related to the same tax jurisdiction .
as of december 31 , 2012 , the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $ 102 million and $ 121 million , respectively , recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities , respectively .
as of december 31 , 2011 , the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $ 108 million and $ 102 million , respectively , recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities , respectively .
the company does not provide deferred taxes on the excess of the financial reporting over tax basis on its investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration .
the excess totaled $ 2125 million and $ 1516 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .
the determination of the additional deferred income taxes on the excess has not been provided because it is not practicable due to the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation .
the following tabular reconciliation presents the total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits : year ended december 31 , ( dollar amounts in millions ) 2012 2011 2010 .

Table:
( dollar amounts in millions )	year ended december 31 , 2012	year ended december 31 , 2011	year ended december 31 , 2010
balance at january 1	$ 349	$ 307	$ 285
additions for tax positions of prior years	4	22	10
reductions for tax positions of prior years	-1 ( 1 )	-1 ( 1 )	-17 ( 17 )
additions based on tax positions related to current year	69	46	35
lapse of statute of limitations	2014	2014	-8 ( 8 )
settlements	-29 ( 29 )	-25 ( 25 )	-2 ( 2 )
positions assumed in acquisitions	12	2014	4
balance at december 31	$ 404	$ 349	$ 307

Post-table text:
included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , are $ 250 million , $ 226 million and $ 194 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate .
the company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expense .
related to the unrecognized tax benefits noted above , the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 3 million during 2012 and in total , as of december 31 , 2012 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 69 million .
the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 10 million during 2011 and in total , as of december 31 , 2011 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 66 million .
the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 8 million during 2010 and in total , as of december 31 , 2010 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 56 million .
pursuant to the amended and restated stock purchase agreement , the company has been indemnified by barclays for $ 73 million and guggenheim for $ 6 million of unrecognized tax benefits .
blackrock is subject to u.s .
federal income tax , state and local income tax , and foreign income tax in multiple jurisdictions .
tax years after 2007 remain open to u.s .
federal income tax examination , tax years after 2005 remain open to state and local income tax examination , and tax years after 2006 remain open to income tax examination in the united kingdom .
with few exceptions , as of december 31 , 2012 , the company is no longer subject to u.s .
federal , state , local or foreign examinations by tax authorities for years before 2006 .
the internal revenue service ( 201cirs 201d ) completed its examination of blackrock 2019s 2006 and 2007 tax years in march 2011 .
in november 2011 , the irs commenced its examination of blackrock 2019s 2008 and 2009 tax years , and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined , it is not expected to be material .
in july 2011 , the irs commenced its federal income tax audit of the bgi group , which blackrock acquired in december 2009 .
the tax years under examination are 2007 through december 1 , 2009 , and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined , it is not expected to be material .
the company is currently under audit in several state and local jurisdictions .
the significant state and local income tax examinations are in california for tax years 2004 through 2006 , new york city for tax years 2007 through 2008 , and new jersey for tax years 2003 through 2009 .
no state and local income tax audits cover years earlier than 2007 except for california , new jersey and new york city .
no state and local income tax audits are expected to result in an assessment material to the consolidated financial statements. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was that increase in 2012?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the balance from the start of 2010 to the end of 2012?
[Turn 2] and what was the increase in 2010 on the positions assumed in acquisitions?
[Turn 3] what was that increase in 2012?

Pre-table text:
19 .
income taxes ( continued ) capital loss carryforwards of $ 69 million and $ 90 million , which were acquired in the bgi transaction and will expire on or before 2013 .
at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had $ 95 million and $ 95 million of valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets , respectively , recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition .
the year- over-year increase in the valuation allowance primarily related to certain foreign deferred income tax assets .
goodwill recorded in connection with the quellos transaction has been reduced during the period by the amount of tax benefit realized from tax-deductible goodwill .
see note 9 , goodwill , for further discussion .
current income taxes are recorded net in the consolidated statements of financial condition when related to the same tax jurisdiction .
as of december 31 , 2012 , the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $ 102 million and $ 121 million , respectively , recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities , respectively .
as of december 31 , 2011 , the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $ 108 million and $ 102 million , respectively , recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities , respectively .
the company does not provide deferred taxes on the excess of the financial reporting over tax basis on its investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration .
the excess totaled $ 2125 million and $ 1516 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .
the determination of the additional deferred income taxes on the excess has not been provided because it is not practicable due to the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation .
the following tabular reconciliation presents the total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits : year ended december 31 , ( dollar amounts in millions ) 2012 2011 2010 .

Table:
( dollar amounts in millions )	year ended december 31 , 2012	year ended december 31 , 2011	year ended december 31 , 2010
balance at january 1	$ 349	$ 307	$ 285
additions for tax positions of prior years	4	22	10
reductions for tax positions of prior years	-1 ( 1 )	-1 ( 1 )	-17 ( 17 )
additions based on tax positions related to current year	69	46	35
lapse of statute of limitations	2014	2014	-8 ( 8 )
settlements	-29 ( 29 )	-25 ( 25 )	-2 ( 2 )
positions assumed in acquisitions	12	2014	4
balance at december 31	$ 404	$ 349	$ 307

Post-table text:
included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , are $ 250 million , $ 226 million and $ 194 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate .
the company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expense .
related to the unrecognized tax benefits noted above , the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 3 million during 2012 and in total , as of december 31 , 2012 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 69 million .
the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 10 million during 2011 and in total , as of december 31 , 2011 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 66 million .
the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 8 million during 2010 and in total , as of december 31 , 2010 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 56 million .
pursuant to the amended and restated stock purchase agreement , the company has been indemnified by barclays for $ 73 million and guggenheim for $ 6 million of unrecognized tax benefits .
blackrock is subject to u.s .
federal income tax , state and local income tax , and foreign income tax in multiple jurisdictions .
tax years after 2007 remain open to u.s .
federal income tax examination , tax years after 2005 remain open to state and local income tax examination , and tax years after 2006 remain open to income tax examination in the united kingdom .
with few exceptions , as of december 31 , 2012 , the company is no longer subject to u.s .
federal , state , local or foreign examinations by tax authorities for years before 2006 .
the internal revenue service ( 201cirs 201d ) completed its examination of blackrock 2019s 2006 and 2007 tax years in march 2011 .
in november 2011 , the irs commenced its examination of blackrock 2019s 2008 and 2009 tax years , and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined , it is not expected to be material .
in july 2011 , the irs commenced its federal income tax audit of the bgi group , which blackrock acquired in december 2009 .
the tax years under examination are 2007 through december 1 , 2009 , and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined , it is not expected to be material .
the company is currently under audit in several state and local jurisdictions .
the significant state and local income tax examinations are in california for tax years 2004 through 2006 , new york city for tax years 2007 through 2008 , and new jersey for tax years 2003 through 2009 .
no state and local income tax audits cover years earlier than 2007 except for california , new jersey and new york city .
no state and local income tax audits are expected to result in an assessment material to the consolidated financial statements. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.