[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was, then, the difference between the cadence design systems inc . percentage and this nasdaq composite one?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] for the five year period ended in 2012, what was the fluctuation of the stockholder return for cadence design systems inc .?
[Turn 2] and what is this fluctuation as a percent of that return in 2007?
[Turn 3] in that same period, what was that fluctuation for the nasdaq composite?
[Turn 4] and what was this nasdaq composite fluctuation as a percentage of the return of that stock in 2007?
[Turn 5] what was, then, the difference between the cadence design systems inc . percentage and this nasdaq composite one?

Pre-table text:
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .
nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .
all rights reserved. .

Table:
	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

Post-table text:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the total, in millions, of sales proceeds for subsidiaries assets in the months of december and august of 2003, combined, in the locations of bangladesh and republic of georgia?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total, in millions, of sales proceeds for subsidiaries assets in the months of december and august of 2003, combined, in the locations of bangladesh and republic of georgia?

Pre-table text:
transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses .
these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions .
the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows ; however , there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond .
asset sales during 2003 , we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries .
this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity .
the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003 .
sales proceeds project name date completed ( in millions ) location .

Table:
project name	date completed	sales proceeds ( in millions )	location
cilcorp/medina valley	january 2003	$ 495	united states
aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart	january 2003	$ 59	australia
mountainview	march 2003	$ 30	united states
kelvin	march 2003	$ 29	south africa
songas	april 2003	$ 94	tanzania
aes barry limited	july 2003	a340/$ 62	united kingdom
aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd	december 2003	$ 145	bangladesh
aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi	august 2003	$ 23	republic of georgia
medway power limited/aes medway operations limited	november 2003	a347/$ 78	united kingdom
aes oasis limited	december 2003	$ 150	pakistan/oman

Post-table text:
the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future .
however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet .
for any sales that happen in the future , there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries .
depending on which businesses are eventually sold , the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations .
furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve .
subsidiary restructuring during 2003 , we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses .
the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities .
businesses impacted include eletropaulo , tiete , uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile .
brazil eletropaulo .
aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998 , when the company was privatized .
in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it .
aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo , including both common and preferred shares , through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 ( 2018 2018bndes 2019 2019 ) , and its wholly-owned subsidiary , bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a .
( 2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019 ) , to aes 2019s subsidiaries , aes elpa s.a .
( 2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019 ) and aes transgas empreendimentos , s.a .
( 2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019 ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
including november of that year, what then becomes that total?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total, in millions, of sales proceeds for subsidiaries assets in the months of december and august of 2003, combined, in the locations of bangladesh and republic of georgia?
[Turn 2] including november of that year, what then becomes that total?

Pre-table text:
transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses .
these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions .
the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows ; however , there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond .
asset sales during 2003 , we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries .
this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity .
the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003 .
sales proceeds project name date completed ( in millions ) location .

Table:
project name	date completed	sales proceeds ( in millions )	location
cilcorp/medina valley	january 2003	$ 495	united states
aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart	january 2003	$ 59	australia
mountainview	march 2003	$ 30	united states
kelvin	march 2003	$ 29	south africa
songas	april 2003	$ 94	tanzania
aes barry limited	july 2003	a340/$ 62	united kingdom
aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd	december 2003	$ 145	bangladesh
aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi	august 2003	$ 23	republic of georgia
medway power limited/aes medway operations limited	november 2003	a347/$ 78	united kingdom
aes oasis limited	december 2003	$ 150	pakistan/oman

Post-table text:
the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future .
however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet .
for any sales that happen in the future , there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries .
depending on which businesses are eventually sold , the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations .
furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve .
subsidiary restructuring during 2003 , we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses .
the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities .
businesses impacted include eletropaulo , tiete , uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile .
brazil eletropaulo .
aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998 , when the company was privatized .
in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it .
aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo , including both common and preferred shares , through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 ( 2018 2018bndes 2019 2019 ) , and its wholly-owned subsidiary , bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a .
( 2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019 ) , to aes 2019s subsidiaries , aes elpa s.a .
( 2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019 ) and aes transgas empreendimentos , s.a .
( 2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019 ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what were the total sales proceeds for subsidiaries assets in december 2003 in pakistan/oman, in millions?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total, in millions, of sales proceeds for subsidiaries assets in the months of december and august of 2003, combined, in the locations of bangladesh and republic of georgia?
[Turn 2] including november of that year, what then becomes that total?
[Turn 3] what were the total sales proceeds for subsidiaries assets in december 2003 in pakistan/oman, in millions?

Pre-table text:
transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses .
these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions .
the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows ; however , there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond .
asset sales during 2003 , we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries .
this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity .
the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003 .
sales proceeds project name date completed ( in millions ) location .

Table:
project name	date completed	sales proceeds ( in millions )	location
cilcorp/medina valley	january 2003	$ 495	united states
aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart	january 2003	$ 59	australia
mountainview	march 2003	$ 30	united states
kelvin	march 2003	$ 29	south africa
songas	april 2003	$ 94	tanzania
aes barry limited	july 2003	a340/$ 62	united kingdom
aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd	december 2003	$ 145	bangladesh
aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi	august 2003	$ 23	republic of georgia
medway power limited/aes medway operations limited	november 2003	a347/$ 78	united kingdom
aes oasis limited	december 2003	$ 150	pakistan/oman

Post-table text:
the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future .
however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet .
for any sales that happen in the future , there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries .
depending on which businesses are eventually sold , the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations .
furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve .
subsidiary restructuring during 2003 , we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses .
the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities .
businesses impacted include eletropaulo , tiete , uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile .
brazil eletropaulo .
aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998 , when the company was privatized .
in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it .
aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo , including both common and preferred shares , through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 ( 2018 2018bndes 2019 2019 ) , and its wholly-owned subsidiary , bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a .
( 2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019 ) , to aes 2019s subsidiaries , aes elpa s.a .
( 2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019 ) and aes transgas empreendimentos , s.a .
( 2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019 ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
including these total sales, what then becomes that total, also in millions?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total, in millions, of sales proceeds for subsidiaries assets in the months of december and august of 2003, combined, in the locations of bangladesh and republic of georgia?
[Turn 2] including november of that year, what then becomes that total?
[Turn 3] what were the total sales proceeds for subsidiaries assets in december 2003 in pakistan/oman, in millions?
[Turn 4] including these total sales, what then becomes that total, also in millions?

Pre-table text:
transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses .
these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions .
the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows ; however , there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond .
asset sales during 2003 , we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries .
this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity .
the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003 .
sales proceeds project name date completed ( in millions ) location .

Table:
project name	date completed	sales proceeds ( in millions )	location
cilcorp/medina valley	january 2003	$ 495	united states
aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart	january 2003	$ 59	australia
mountainview	march 2003	$ 30	united states
kelvin	march 2003	$ 29	south africa
songas	april 2003	$ 94	tanzania
aes barry limited	july 2003	a340/$ 62	united kingdom
aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd	december 2003	$ 145	bangladesh
aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi	august 2003	$ 23	republic of georgia
medway power limited/aes medway operations limited	november 2003	a347/$ 78	united kingdom
aes oasis limited	december 2003	$ 150	pakistan/oman

Post-table text:
the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future .
however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet .
for any sales that happen in the future , there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries .
depending on which businesses are eventually sold , the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations .
furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve .
subsidiary restructuring during 2003 , we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses .
the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities .
businesses impacted include eletropaulo , tiete , uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile .
brazil eletropaulo .
aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998 , when the company was privatized .
in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it .
aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo , including both common and preferred shares , through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 ( 2018 2018bndes 2019 2019 ) , and its wholly-owned subsidiary , bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a .
( 2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019 ) , to aes 2019s subsidiaries , aes elpa s.a .
( 2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019 ) and aes transgas empreendimentos , s.a .
( 2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019 ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the performance value of the united parcel service , inc . in 2006?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the performance value of the united parcel service , inc . in 2006?

Pre-table text:
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing .
the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .
the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .
comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

Table:
	12/31/01	12/31/02	12/31/03	12/31/04	12/31/05	12/31/06
united parcel service inc .	$ 100.00	$ 117.19	$ 140.49	$ 163.54	$ 146.35	$ 148.92
s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 77.90	$ 100.24	$ 111.15	$ 116.61	$ 135.02
dow jones transportation average	$ 100.00	$ 88.52	$ 116.70	$ 149.06	$ 166.42	$ 182.76

Post-table text:
securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .
these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was the change in this performance value from 2001 to 2006?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the performance value of the united parcel service , inc . in 2006?
[Turn 2] and what was the change in this performance value from 2001 to 2006?

Pre-table text:
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing .
the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .
the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .
comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

Table:
	12/31/01	12/31/02	12/31/03	12/31/04	12/31/05	12/31/06
united parcel service inc .	$ 100.00	$ 117.19	$ 140.49	$ 163.54	$ 146.35	$ 148.92
s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 77.90	$ 100.24	$ 111.15	$ 116.61	$ 135.02
dow jones transportation average	$ 100.00	$ 88.52	$ 116.70	$ 149.06	$ 166.42	$ 182.76

Post-table text:
securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .
these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the performance value of the s&p 500 index in 2006?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the performance value of the united parcel service , inc . in 2006?
[Turn 2] and what was the change in this performance value from 2001 to 2006?
[Turn 3] what was the performance value of the s&p 500 index in 2006?

Pre-table text:
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing .
the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .
the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .
comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

Table:
	12/31/01	12/31/02	12/31/03	12/31/04	12/31/05	12/31/06
united parcel service inc .	$ 100.00	$ 117.19	$ 140.49	$ 163.54	$ 146.35	$ 148.92
s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 77.90	$ 100.24	$ 111.15	$ 116.61	$ 135.02
dow jones transportation average	$ 100.00	$ 88.52	$ 116.70	$ 149.06	$ 166.42	$ 182.76

Post-table text:
securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .
these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was the change in this performance value from 2001 to 2006?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the performance value of the united parcel service , inc . in 2006?
[Turn 2] and what was the change in this performance value from 2001 to 2006?
[Turn 3] what was the performance value of the s&p 500 index in 2006?
[Turn 4] and what was the change in this performance value from 2001 to 2006?

Pre-table text:
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing .
the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .
the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .
comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

Table:
	12/31/01	12/31/02	12/31/03	12/31/04	12/31/05	12/31/06
united parcel service inc .	$ 100.00	$ 117.19	$ 140.49	$ 163.54	$ 146.35	$ 148.92
s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 77.90	$ 100.24	$ 111.15	$ 116.61	$ 135.02
dow jones transportation average	$ 100.00	$ 88.52	$ 116.70	$ 149.06	$ 166.42	$ 182.76

Post-table text:
securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .
these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is, then, the difference between the performance value change of the united parcel service , inc . and the one of s&p 500 index?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the performance value of the united parcel service , inc . in 2006?
[Turn 2] and what was the change in this performance value from 2001 to 2006?
[Turn 3] what was the performance value of the s&p 500 index in 2006?
[Turn 4] and what was the change in this performance value from 2001 to 2006?
[Turn 5] what is, then, the difference between the performance value change of the united parcel service , inc . and the one of s&p 500 index?

Pre-table text:
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing .
the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .
the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .
comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

Table:
	12/31/01	12/31/02	12/31/03	12/31/04	12/31/05	12/31/06
united parcel service inc .	$ 100.00	$ 117.19	$ 140.49	$ 163.54	$ 146.35	$ 148.92
s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 77.90	$ 100.24	$ 111.15	$ 116.61	$ 135.02
dow jones transportation average	$ 100.00	$ 88.52	$ 116.70	$ 149.06	$ 166.42	$ 182.76

Post-table text:
securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .
these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the value of miscellaneous receivables and other assets in 2012 divided by 100?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of miscellaneous receivables and other assets in 2012 divided by 100?

Pre-table text:
notes to consolidated financial statements note 12 .
other assets other assets are generally less liquid , non-financial assets .
the table below presents other assets by type. .

Table:
in millions	as of december 2012	as of december 2011
property leasehold improvements andequipment1	$ 8217	$ 8697
goodwill and identifiable intangibleassets2	5099	5468
income tax-related assets3	5620	5017
equity-method investments4	453	664
miscellaneous receivables and other5	20234	3306
total	$ 39623	$ 23152

Post-table text:
1 .
net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $ 9.05 billion and $ 8.46 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively .
2 .
includes $ 149 million of intangible assets classified as held for sale .
see note 13 for further information about goodwill and identifiable intangible assets .
3 .
see note 24 for further information about income taxes .
4 .
excludes investments accounted for at fair value under the fair value option where the firm would otherwise apply the equity method of accounting of $ 5.54 billion and $ 4.17 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , which are included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value . 201d the firm has generally elected the fair value option for such investments acquired after the fair value option became available .
5 .
includes $ 16.77 billion of assets related to the firm 2019s reinsurance business which were classified as held for sale as of december 2012 .
assets held for sale in the fourth quarter of 2012 , the firm classified its reinsurance business within its institutional client services segment as held for sale .
assets related to this business of $ 16.92 billion , consisting primarily of available-for-sale securities and separate account assets at fair value , are included in 201cother assets . 201d liabilities related to the business of $ 14.62 billion are included in 201cother liabilities and accrued expenses . 201d see note 8 for further information about insurance-related assets and liabilities held for sale at fair value .
the firm expects to complete the sale of a majority stake in its reinsurance business in 2013 and does not expect to recognize a material gain or loss upon the sale .
upon completion of the sale , the firm will no longer consolidate this business .
property , leasehold improvements and equipment property , leasehold improvements and equipment included $ 6.20 billion and $ 6.48 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to property , leasehold improvements and equipment that the firm uses in connection with its operations .
the remainder is held by investment entities , including vies , consolidated by the firm .
substantially all property and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the asset .
leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the improvement or the term of the lease , whichever is shorter .
certain costs of software developed or obtained for internal use are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the software .
property , leasehold improvements and equipment are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that an asset 2019s or asset group 2019s carrying value may not be fully recoverable .
the firm 2019s policy for impairment testing of property , leasehold improvements and equipment is the same as is used for identifiable intangible assets with finite lives .
see note 13 for further information .
goldman sachs 2012 annual report 163 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is that less the value of assets related to the firm 2019s reinsurance business which were classified as held for sale as of december 2012?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of miscellaneous receivables and other assets in 2012 divided by 100?
[Turn 2] what is that less the value of assets related to the firm 2019s reinsurance business which were classified as held for sale as of december 2012?

Pre-table text:
notes to consolidated financial statements note 12 .
other assets other assets are generally less liquid , non-financial assets .
the table below presents other assets by type. .

Table:
in millions	as of december 2012	as of december 2011
property leasehold improvements andequipment1	$ 8217	$ 8697
goodwill and identifiable intangibleassets2	5099	5468
income tax-related assets3	5620	5017
equity-method investments4	453	664
miscellaneous receivables and other5	20234	3306
total	$ 39623	$ 23152

Post-table text:
1 .
net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $ 9.05 billion and $ 8.46 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively .
2 .
includes $ 149 million of intangible assets classified as held for sale .
see note 13 for further information about goodwill and identifiable intangible assets .
3 .
see note 24 for further information about income taxes .
4 .
excludes investments accounted for at fair value under the fair value option where the firm would otherwise apply the equity method of accounting of $ 5.54 billion and $ 4.17 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , which are included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value . 201d the firm has generally elected the fair value option for such investments acquired after the fair value option became available .
5 .
includes $ 16.77 billion of assets related to the firm 2019s reinsurance business which were classified as held for sale as of december 2012 .
assets held for sale in the fourth quarter of 2012 , the firm classified its reinsurance business within its institutional client services segment as held for sale .
assets related to this business of $ 16.92 billion , consisting primarily of available-for-sale securities and separate account assets at fair value , are included in 201cother assets . 201d liabilities related to the business of $ 14.62 billion are included in 201cother liabilities and accrued expenses . 201d see note 8 for further information about insurance-related assets and liabilities held for sale at fair value .
the firm expects to complete the sale of a majority stake in its reinsurance business in 2013 and does not expect to recognize a material gain or loss upon the sale .
upon completion of the sale , the firm will no longer consolidate this business .
property , leasehold improvements and equipment property , leasehold improvements and equipment included $ 6.20 billion and $ 6.48 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to property , leasehold improvements and equipment that the firm uses in connection with its operations .
the remainder is held by investment entities , including vies , consolidated by the firm .
substantially all property and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the asset .
leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the improvement or the term of the lease , whichever is shorter .
certain costs of software developed or obtained for internal use are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the software .
property , leasehold improvements and equipment are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that an asset 2019s or asset group 2019s carrying value may not be fully recoverable .
the firm 2019s policy for impairment testing of property , leasehold improvements and equipment is the same as is used for identifiable intangible assets with finite lives .
see note 13 for further information .
goldman sachs 2012 annual report 163 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the net revenue in 2016 for entergy texas , inc.?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net revenue in 2016 for entergy texas , inc.?

Pre-table text:
entergy texas , inc .
and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue .
2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 5.2 million primarily due to the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue and a lower effective tax rate .
net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2015 net revenue	$ 637.2
reserve equalization	14.3
purchased power capacity	12.4
transmission revenue	7.0
retail electric price	5.4
net wholesale	-27.8 ( 27.8 )
other	-4.3 ( 4.3 )
2016 net revenue	$ 644.2

Post-table text:
the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a reduction in reserve equalization expense primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the execution of a new purchased power agreement and entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement , each in november 2015 , and entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement .
the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased expenses due to the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 , as well as capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts .
the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in attachment o rates charged by miso to transmission customers and a settlement of attachment o rates previously billed to transmission customers by miso. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was it in 2015?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net revenue in 2016 for entergy texas , inc.?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2015?

Pre-table text:
entergy texas , inc .
and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue .
2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 5.2 million primarily due to the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue and a lower effective tax rate .
net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2015 net revenue	$ 637.2
reserve equalization	14.3
purchased power capacity	12.4
transmission revenue	7.0
retail electric price	5.4
net wholesale	-27.8 ( 27.8 )
other	-4.3 ( 4.3 )
2016 net revenue	$ 644.2

Post-table text:
the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a reduction in reserve equalization expense primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the execution of a new purchased power agreement and entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement , each in november 2015 , and entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement .
the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased expenses due to the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 , as well as capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts .
the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in attachment o rates charged by miso to transmission customers and a settlement of attachment o rates previously billed to transmission customers by miso. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was, then, the change over the year?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net revenue in 2016 for entergy texas , inc.?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2015?
[Turn 3] what was, then, the change over the year?

Pre-table text:
entergy texas , inc .
and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue .
2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 5.2 million primarily due to the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue and a lower effective tax rate .
net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2015 net revenue	$ 637.2
reserve equalization	14.3
purchased power capacity	12.4
transmission revenue	7.0
retail electric price	5.4
net wholesale	-27.8 ( 27.8 )
other	-4.3 ( 4.3 )
2016 net revenue	$ 644.2

Post-table text:
the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a reduction in reserve equalization expense primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the execution of a new purchased power agreement and entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement , each in november 2015 , and entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement .
the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased expenses due to the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 , as well as capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts .
the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in attachment o rates charged by miso to transmission customers and a settlement of attachment o rates previously billed to transmission customers by miso. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the net revenue in 2015 for entergy texas , inc.?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net revenue in 2016 for entergy texas , inc.?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2015?
[Turn 3] what was, then, the change over the year?
[Turn 4] what was the net revenue in 2015 for entergy texas , inc.?

Pre-table text:
entergy texas , inc .
and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue .
2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 5.2 million primarily due to the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue and a lower effective tax rate .
net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2015 net revenue	$ 637.2
reserve equalization	14.3
purchased power capacity	12.4
transmission revenue	7.0
retail electric price	5.4
net wholesale	-27.8 ( 27.8 )
other	-4.3 ( 4.3 )
2016 net revenue	$ 644.2

Post-table text:
the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a reduction in reserve equalization expense primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the execution of a new purchased power agreement and entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement , each in november 2015 , and entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement .
the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased expenses due to the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 , as well as capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts .
the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in attachment o rates charged by miso to transmission customers and a settlement of attachment o rates previously billed to transmission customers by miso. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2015 net revenue?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net revenue in 2016 for entergy texas , inc.?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2015?
[Turn 3] what was, then, the change over the year?
[Turn 4] what was the net revenue in 2015 for entergy texas , inc.?
[Turn 5] and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2015 net revenue?

Pre-table text:
entergy texas , inc .
and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue .
2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 5.2 million primarily due to the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue and a lower effective tax rate .
net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2015 net revenue	$ 637.2
reserve equalization	14.3
purchased power capacity	12.4
transmission revenue	7.0
retail electric price	5.4
net wholesale	-27.8 ( 27.8 )
other	-4.3 ( 4.3 )
2016 net revenue	$ 644.2

Post-table text:
the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a reduction in reserve equalization expense primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the execution of a new purchased power agreement and entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement , each in november 2015 , and entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement .
the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased expenses due to the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 , as well as capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts .
the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in attachment o rates charged by miso to transmission customers and a settlement of attachment o rates previously billed to transmission customers by miso. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the percentage of the total second generation capital expenditures by reportable operating segment that was office related in 2012?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the percentage of the total second generation capital expenditures by reportable operating segment that was office related in 2012?

Pre-table text:
annual report 2013 duke realty corporation 37 in addition to the capitalization of overhead costs discussed above , we also capitalized $ 16.8 million , $ 9.4 million and $ 4.3 million of interest costs in the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .
the following table summarizes our second generation capital expenditures by reportable operating segment ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
	2013	2012	2011
industrial	$ 41971	$ 33095	$ 34872
office	46600	30092	63933
medical office	3106	641	410
non-reportable rental operations segments	121	56	49
total	$ 91798	$ 63884	$ 99264

Post-table text:
both our first and second generation expenditures vary significantly between leases on a per square foot basis , dependent upon several factors including the product type , the nature of a tenant's operations , the specific physical characteristics of each individual property as well as the market in which the property is located .
second generation expenditures related to the 79 suburban office buildings that were sold in the blackstone office disposition totaled $ 26.2 million in 2011 .
dividends and distributions we are required to meet the distribution requirements of the internal revenue code of 1986 , as amended ( the "code" ) , in order to maintain our reit status .
we paid dividends of $ 0.68 per common share for each of the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 .
we expect to continue to distribute at least an amount equal to our taxable earnings , to meet the requirements to maintain our reit status , and additional amounts as determined by our board of directors .
distributions are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and are subject to actual cash available for distribution , our financial condition , capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant .
at december 31 , 2013 we had three series of preferred stock outstanding .
the annual dividend rates on our preferred shares range between 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and 6.625% ( 6.625 % ) and are paid quarterly in arrears .
in february 2013 , we redeemed all of our outstanding series o shares for a total payment of $ 178.0 million , thus reducing our future quarterly dividend commitments by $ 3.7 million .
in march 2012 , we redeemed all of our 6.950% ( 6.950 % ) series m cumulative redeemable preferred shares ( "series m shares" ) for a total payment of $ 168.3 million , thus reducing our future quarterly dividend commitments by $ 2.9 million .
in july 2011 , we redeemed all of our 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) series n cumulative redeemable preferred shares ( "series n shares" ) for a total payment of $ 108.6 million , thus reducing our future quarterly dividend commitments by $ 2.0 million .
debt maturities debt outstanding at december 31 , 2013 had a face value totaling $ 4.3 billion with a weighted average interest rate of 5.49% ( 5.49 % ) and with maturity dates ranging between 2014 and 2028 .
of this total amount , we had $ 3.1 billion of unsecured debt , $ 1.1 billion of secured debt and $ 88.0 million outstanding on the drlp unsecured line of credit at december 31 , 2013 .
we made scheduled and unscheduled principal payments of $ 1.0 billion on outstanding debt during the year ended december 31 , 2013. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the percent of the debt maturities outstanding at 12/31/12 that was unsecured debt?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the percentage of the total second generation capital expenditures by reportable operating segment that was office related in 2012?
[Turn 2] what was the percent of the debt maturities outstanding at 12/31/12 that was unsecured debt?

Pre-table text:
annual report 2013 duke realty corporation 37 in addition to the capitalization of overhead costs discussed above , we also capitalized $ 16.8 million , $ 9.4 million and $ 4.3 million of interest costs in the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .
the following table summarizes our second generation capital expenditures by reportable operating segment ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
	2013	2012	2011
industrial	$ 41971	$ 33095	$ 34872
office	46600	30092	63933
medical office	3106	641	410
non-reportable rental operations segments	121	56	49
total	$ 91798	$ 63884	$ 99264

Post-table text:
both our first and second generation expenditures vary significantly between leases on a per square foot basis , dependent upon several factors including the product type , the nature of a tenant's operations , the specific physical characteristics of each individual property as well as the market in which the property is located .
second generation expenditures related to the 79 suburban office buildings that were sold in the blackstone office disposition totaled $ 26.2 million in 2011 .
dividends and distributions we are required to meet the distribution requirements of the internal revenue code of 1986 , as amended ( the "code" ) , in order to maintain our reit status .
we paid dividends of $ 0.68 per common share for each of the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 .
we expect to continue to distribute at least an amount equal to our taxable earnings , to meet the requirements to maintain our reit status , and additional amounts as determined by our board of directors .
distributions are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and are subject to actual cash available for distribution , our financial condition , capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant .
at december 31 , 2013 we had three series of preferred stock outstanding .
the annual dividend rates on our preferred shares range between 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and 6.625% ( 6.625 % ) and are paid quarterly in arrears .
in february 2013 , we redeemed all of our outstanding series o shares for a total payment of $ 178.0 million , thus reducing our future quarterly dividend commitments by $ 3.7 million .
in march 2012 , we redeemed all of our 6.950% ( 6.950 % ) series m cumulative redeemable preferred shares ( "series m shares" ) for a total payment of $ 168.3 million , thus reducing our future quarterly dividend commitments by $ 2.9 million .
in july 2011 , we redeemed all of our 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) series n cumulative redeemable preferred shares ( "series n shares" ) for a total payment of $ 108.6 million , thus reducing our future quarterly dividend commitments by $ 2.0 million .
debt maturities debt outstanding at december 31 , 2013 had a face value totaling $ 4.3 billion with a weighted average interest rate of 5.49% ( 5.49 % ) and with maturity dates ranging between 2014 and 2028 .
of this total amount , we had $ 3.1 billion of unsecured debt , $ 1.1 billion of secured debt and $ 88.0 million outstanding on the drlp unsecured line of credit at december 31 , 2013 .
we made scheduled and unscheduled principal payments of $ 1.0 billion on outstanding debt during the year ended december 31 , 2013. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the sum of long-term debt due in 2004 and 2005?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the sum of long-term debt due in 2004 and 2005?

Pre-table text:
entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , certain series of which are secured by non-interest bearing first mortgage bonds .
( b ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1 , 2005 and can then be remarketed .
( c ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1 , 2004 and can then be remarketed .
( d ) the bonds had a mandatory tender date of october 1 , 2003 .
entergy louisiana purchased the bonds from the holders , pursuant to the mandatory tender provision , and has not remarketed the bonds at this time .
entergy louisiana used a combination of cash on hand and short-term borrowing to buy-in the bonds .
( e ) on june 1 , 2002 , entergy louisiana remarketed $ 55 million st .
charles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030 , resetting the interest rate to 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) through may 2005 .
( f ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1 , 2005 and can then be remarketed .
( g ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy's nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .
the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .
entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( h ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year .
it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms .
the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2003 , for the next five years are as follows: .

Table:
	( in thousands )
2004	$ 503215
2005	$ 462420
2006	$ 75896
2007	$ 624539
2008	$ 941625

Post-table text:
in november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .
entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .
these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .
in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .
this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 , and is included in the note payable to nypa balance above .
in july 2003 , a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa .
under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the domestic utility companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .
covenants in the entergy corporation notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization .
if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other indebtedness or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the notes' maturity dates may occur. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is that divided by 1000?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the sum of long-term debt due in 2004 and 2005?
[Turn 2] what is that divided by 1000?

Pre-table text:
entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , certain series of which are secured by non-interest bearing first mortgage bonds .
( b ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1 , 2005 and can then be remarketed .
( c ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1 , 2004 and can then be remarketed .
( d ) the bonds had a mandatory tender date of october 1 , 2003 .
entergy louisiana purchased the bonds from the holders , pursuant to the mandatory tender provision , and has not remarketed the bonds at this time .
entergy louisiana used a combination of cash on hand and short-term borrowing to buy-in the bonds .
( e ) on june 1 , 2002 , entergy louisiana remarketed $ 55 million st .
charles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030 , resetting the interest rate to 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) through may 2005 .
( f ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1 , 2005 and can then be remarketed .
( g ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy's nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .
the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .
entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( h ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year .
it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms .
the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2003 , for the next five years are as follows: .

Table:
	( in thousands )
2004	$ 503215
2005	$ 462420
2006	$ 75896
2007	$ 624539
2008	$ 941625

Post-table text:
in november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .
entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .
these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .
in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .
this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 , and is included in the note payable to nypa balance above .
in july 2003 , a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa .
under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the domestic utility companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .
covenants in the entergy corporation notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization .
if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other indebtedness or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the notes' maturity dates may occur. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the change in the amount of guarantees from parent company from 2007 to 2008?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the amount of guarantees from parent company from 2007 to 2008?

Pre-table text:
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have certain contingent obligations under guarantees of certain of our subsidiaries ( 201cparent company guarantees 201d ) relating principally to credit facilities , guarantees of certain media payables and operating leases .
the amount of such parent company guarantees was $ 255.7 and $ 327.1 as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee .
as of december 31 , 2008 , there are no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees .
contingent acquisition obligations we have structured certain acquisitions with additional contingent purchase price obligations in order to reduce the potential risk associated with negative future performance of the acquired entity .
in addition , we have entered into agreements that may require us to purchase additional equity interests in certain consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries .
the amounts relating to these transactions are based on estimates of the future financial performance of the acquired entity , the timing of the exercise of these rights , changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other factors .
we have not recorded a liability for these items since the definitive amounts payable are not determinable or distributable .
when the contingent acquisition obligations have been met and consideration is determinable and distributable , we record the fair value of this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity .
however , certain acquisitions contain deferred payments that are fixed and determinable on the acquisition date .
in such cases , we record a liability for the payment and record this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity on the acquisition date .
if deferred payments and purchases of additional interests after the effective date of purchase are contingent upon the future employment of the former owners then we recognize these payments as compensation expense .
compensation expense is determined based on the terms and conditions of the respective acquisition agreements and employment terms of the former owners of the acquired businesses .
this future expense will not be allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired and is amortized over the required employment terms of the former owners .
the following table details the estimated liability with respect to our contingent acquisition obligations and the estimated amount that would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date .
we have certain put options that are exercisable at the discretion of the minority owners as of december 31 , 2008 .
as such , these estimated acquisition payments of $ 5.5 have been included within the total payments expected to be made in 2009 in the table below and , if not made in 2009 , will continue to carry forward into 2010 or beyond until they are exercised or expire .
all payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revisions as the earn-out periods progress .
as of december 31 , 2008 , our estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash are as follows: .

Table:
	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	thereafter	total
deferred acquisition payments	$ 67.5	$ 32.1	$ 30.1	$ 4.5	$ 5.7	$ 2014	$ 139.9
put and call options with affiliates1	11.8	34.3	73.6	70.8	70.2	2.2	262.9
total contingent acquisition payments	79.3	66.4	103.7	75.3	75.9	2.2	402.8
less cash compensation expense included above	2.6	1.3	0.7	0.7	0.3	2014	5.6
total	$ 76.7	$ 65.1	$ 103.0	$ 74.6	$ 75.6	$ 2.2	$ 397.2

Post-table text:
1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both put and call options with similar terms and conditions .
in such instances , we have included the related estimated contingent acquisition obligation in the period when the earliest related option is exercisable .
as a result of revisions made during 2008 to eitf topic no .
d-98 , classification and measurement of redeemable securities ( 201ceitf d-98 201d ) .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and how much does this change represent in relation to that amount of guarantees in 2007, in percentage?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the amount of guarantees from parent company from 2007 to 2008?
[Turn 2] and how much does this change represent in relation to that amount of guarantees in 2007, in percentage?

Pre-table text:
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have certain contingent obligations under guarantees of certain of our subsidiaries ( 201cparent company guarantees 201d ) relating principally to credit facilities , guarantees of certain media payables and operating leases .
the amount of such parent company guarantees was $ 255.7 and $ 327.1 as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee .
as of december 31 , 2008 , there are no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees .
contingent acquisition obligations we have structured certain acquisitions with additional contingent purchase price obligations in order to reduce the potential risk associated with negative future performance of the acquired entity .
in addition , we have entered into agreements that may require us to purchase additional equity interests in certain consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries .
the amounts relating to these transactions are based on estimates of the future financial performance of the acquired entity , the timing of the exercise of these rights , changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other factors .
we have not recorded a liability for these items since the definitive amounts payable are not determinable or distributable .
when the contingent acquisition obligations have been met and consideration is determinable and distributable , we record the fair value of this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity .
however , certain acquisitions contain deferred payments that are fixed and determinable on the acquisition date .
in such cases , we record a liability for the payment and record this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity on the acquisition date .
if deferred payments and purchases of additional interests after the effective date of purchase are contingent upon the future employment of the former owners then we recognize these payments as compensation expense .
compensation expense is determined based on the terms and conditions of the respective acquisition agreements and employment terms of the former owners of the acquired businesses .
this future expense will not be allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired and is amortized over the required employment terms of the former owners .
the following table details the estimated liability with respect to our contingent acquisition obligations and the estimated amount that would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date .
we have certain put options that are exercisable at the discretion of the minority owners as of december 31 , 2008 .
as such , these estimated acquisition payments of $ 5.5 have been included within the total payments expected to be made in 2009 in the table below and , if not made in 2009 , will continue to carry forward into 2010 or beyond until they are exercised or expire .
all payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revisions as the earn-out periods progress .
as of december 31 , 2008 , our estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash are as follows: .

Table:
	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	thereafter	total
deferred acquisition payments	$ 67.5	$ 32.1	$ 30.1	$ 4.5	$ 5.7	$ 2014	$ 139.9
put and call options with affiliates1	11.8	34.3	73.6	70.8	70.2	2.2	262.9
total contingent acquisition payments	79.3	66.4	103.7	75.3	75.9	2.2	402.8
less cash compensation expense included above	2.6	1.3	0.7	0.7	0.3	2014	5.6
total	$ 76.7	$ 65.1	$ 103.0	$ 74.6	$ 75.6	$ 2.2	$ 397.2

Post-table text:
1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both put and call options with similar terms and conditions .
in such instances , we have included the related estimated contingent acquisition obligation in the period when the earliest related option is exercisable .
as a result of revisions made during 2008 to eitf topic no .
d-98 , classification and measurement of redeemable securities ( 201ceitf d-98 201d ) .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the beginning balance in the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits in 2018?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the beginning balance in the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits in 2018?

Pre-table text:
table of contents adobe inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) certain states and foreign jurisdictions to fully utilize available tax credits and other attributes .
the deferred tax assets are offset by a valuation allowance to the extent it is more likely than not that they are not expected to be realized .
we provide u.s .
income taxes on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries unless the subsidiaries 2019 earnings are considered permanently reinvested outside the united states or are exempted from taxation as a result of the new territorial tax system .
to the extent that the foreign earnings previously treated as permanently reinvested are repatriated , the related u.s .
tax liability may be reduced by any foreign income taxes paid on these earnings .
as of november 30 , 2018 , the cumulative amount of earnings upon which u.s .
income taxes have not been provided is approximately $ 275 million .
the unrecognized deferred tax liability for these earnings is approximately $ 57.8 million .
as of november 30 , 2018 , we have net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 881.1 million for federal and $ 349.7 million for state .
we also have federal , state and foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $ 8.8 million , $ 189.9 million and $ 14.9 million , respectively .
the net operating loss carryforward assets and tax credits will expire in various years from fiscal 2019 through 2036 .
the state tax credit carryforwards and a portion of the federal net operating loss carryforwards can be carried forward indefinitely .
the net operating loss carryforward assets and certain credits are reduced by the valuation allowance and are subject to an annual limitation under internal revenue code section 382 , the carrying amount of which are expected to be fully realized .
as of november 30 , 2018 , a valuation allowance of $ 174.5 million has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to certain state and foreign assets .
for fiscal 2018 , the total change in the valuation allowance was $ 80.9 million .
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2018 and 2017 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
	2018	2017
beginning balance	$ 172945	$ 178413
gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions	16191	3680
gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions	-4000 ( 4000 )	-30166 ( 30166 )
gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions	60721	24927
settlements with taxing authorities	2014	-3876 ( 3876 )
lapse of statute of limitations	-45922 ( 45922 )	-8819 ( 8819 )
foreign exchange gains and losses	-3783 ( 3783 )	8786
ending balance	$ 196152	$ 172945

Post-table text:
the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns were approximately $ 24.6 million and $ 23.6 million for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively .
these amounts were included in long-term income taxes payable in their respective years .
we file income tax returns in the united states on a federal basis and in many u.s .
state and foreign jurisdictions .
we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities .
our major tax jurisdictions are ireland , california and the united states .
for ireland , california and the united states , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2008 , 2014 and 2015 , respectively .
we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from these examinations .
we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position .
the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process .
these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance of short-term and long- term assets , liabilities and income taxes payable .
we believe that within the next 12 months , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both .
given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential effect in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 45 million. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.