[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is that times 1000?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was total operating income in 2013?
[Turn 2] what is that times 1000?

Pre-table text:
reinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue decreased 2% ( 2 % ) in 2014 reflecting a 1% ( 1 % ) unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates and 1% ( 1 % ) decline in organic revenue growth due primarily to a significant unfavorable market impact in treaty , partially offset by net new business growth in treaty placements globally and growth in capital markets transactions and advisory business , as well as facultative placements .
operating income operating income increased $ 108 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , from 2013 to $ 1.6 billion in 2014 .
in 2014 , operating income margins in this segment were 21.0% ( 21.0 % ) , an increase of 120 basis points from 19.8% ( 19.8 % ) in 2013 .
operating margin improvement was driven by solid organic revenue growth , return on investments , expense discipline and savings related to the restructuring programs , partially offset by a $ 61 million unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates .
hr solutions .

Table:
years ended december 31	2014	2013	2012
revenue	$ 4264	$ 4057	$ 3925
operating income	485	318	289
operating margin	11.4% ( 11.4 % )	7.8% ( 7.8 % )	7.4% ( 7.4 % )

Post-table text:
our hr solutions segment generated approximately 35% ( 35 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2014 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration .
2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries .
2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management .
2022 investment consulting advises public and private companies , other institutions and trustees on developing and maintaining investment programs across a broad range of plan types , including defined benefit plans , defined contribution plans , endowments and foundations .
2022 benefits administration applies our human resource expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services .
our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions .
2022 exchanges is building and operating healthcare exchanges that provide employers with a cost effective alternative to traditional employee and retiree healthcare , while helping individuals select the insurance that best meets their needs .
2022 human resource business processing outsourcing provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and record and manage talent , workforce and other core human resource process transactions as well as other complementary services such as flexible spending , dependent audit and participant advocacy .
disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets created significant uncertainty in the marketplace .
weak economic conditions in many markets around the globe continued throughout 2014 and have adversely impacted our clients' financial condition and therefore the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate .
while we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and putting continued pressure on the pricing of those services , which is having an adverse effect on our new business and results of operations. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is that less the operating income growth value in 2013?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was total operating income in 2013?
[Turn 2] what is that times 1000?
[Turn 3] what is that less the operating income growth value in 2013?

Pre-table text:
reinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue decreased 2% ( 2 % ) in 2014 reflecting a 1% ( 1 % ) unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates and 1% ( 1 % ) decline in organic revenue growth due primarily to a significant unfavorable market impact in treaty , partially offset by net new business growth in treaty placements globally and growth in capital markets transactions and advisory business , as well as facultative placements .
operating income operating income increased $ 108 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , from 2013 to $ 1.6 billion in 2014 .
in 2014 , operating income margins in this segment were 21.0% ( 21.0 % ) , an increase of 120 basis points from 19.8% ( 19.8 % ) in 2013 .
operating margin improvement was driven by solid organic revenue growth , return on investments , expense discipline and savings related to the restructuring programs , partially offset by a $ 61 million unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates .
hr solutions .

Table:
years ended december 31	2014	2013	2012
revenue	$ 4264	$ 4057	$ 3925
operating income	485	318	289
operating margin	11.4% ( 11.4 % )	7.8% ( 7.8 % )	7.4% ( 7.4 % )

Post-table text:
our hr solutions segment generated approximately 35% ( 35 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2014 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration .
2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries .
2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management .
2022 investment consulting advises public and private companies , other institutions and trustees on developing and maintaining investment programs across a broad range of plan types , including defined benefit plans , defined contribution plans , endowments and foundations .
2022 benefits administration applies our human resource expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services .
our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions .
2022 exchanges is building and operating healthcare exchanges that provide employers with a cost effective alternative to traditional employee and retiree healthcare , while helping individuals select the insurance that best meets their needs .
2022 human resource business processing outsourcing provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and record and manage talent , workforce and other core human resource process transactions as well as other complementary services such as flexible spending , dependent audit and participant advocacy .
disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets created significant uncertainty in the marketplace .
weak economic conditions in many markets around the globe continued throughout 2014 and have adversely impacted our clients' financial condition and therefore the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate .
while we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and putting continued pressure on the pricing of those services , which is having an adverse effect on our new business and results of operations. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the net change in development costs from 2006 to 2007?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net change in development costs from 2006 to 2007?

Pre-table text:
supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) c o n t i n u e d summary of changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 sales and transfers of oil and gas produced , net of production , transportation and administrative costs $ ( 4887 ) $ ( 5312 ) $ ( 3754 ) net changes in prices and production , transportation and administrative costs related to future production 12845 ( 1342 ) 6648 .

Table:
( in millions )	2007	2006	2005
sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production transportation and administrative costs	$ -4887 ( 4887 )	$ -5312 ( 5312 )	$ -3754 ( 3754 )
net changes in prices and production transportation and administrative costs related to future production	12845	-1342 ( 1342 )	6648
extensions discoveries and improved recovery less related costs	1816	1290	700
development costs incurred during the period	1654	1251	1030
changes in estimated future development costs	-1727 ( 1727 )	-527 ( 527 )	-552 ( 552 )
revisions of previous quantity estimates	290	1319	820
net changes in purchases and sales of minerals in place	23	30	4557
accretion of discount	1726	1882	1124
net change in income taxes	-6751 ( 6751 )	-660 ( 660 )	-6694 ( 6694 )
timing and other	-12 ( 12 )	-14 ( 14 )	307
net change for the year	4977	-2083 ( 2083 )	4186
beginning of year	8518	10601	6415
end of year	$ 13495	$ 8518	$ 10601
net change for the year from discontinued operations	$ 2013	$ -216 ( 216 )	$ 162

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what were development costs in 2007?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net change in development costs from 2006 to 2007?
[Turn 2] what were development costs in 2007?

Pre-table text:
supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) c o n t i n u e d summary of changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 sales and transfers of oil and gas produced , net of production , transportation and administrative costs $ ( 4887 ) $ ( 5312 ) $ ( 3754 ) net changes in prices and production , transportation and administrative costs related to future production 12845 ( 1342 ) 6648 .

Table:
( in millions )	2007	2006	2005
sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production transportation and administrative costs	$ -4887 ( 4887 )	$ -5312 ( 5312 )	$ -3754 ( 3754 )
net changes in prices and production transportation and administrative costs related to future production	12845	-1342 ( 1342 )	6648
extensions discoveries and improved recovery less related costs	1816	1290	700
development costs incurred during the period	1654	1251	1030
changes in estimated future development costs	-1727 ( 1727 )	-527 ( 527 )	-552 ( 552 )
revisions of previous quantity estimates	290	1319	820
net changes in purchases and sales of minerals in place	23	30	4557
accretion of discount	1726	1882	1124
net change in income taxes	-6751 ( 6751 )	-660 ( 660 )	-6694 ( 6694 )
timing and other	-12 ( 12 )	-14 ( 14 )	307
net change for the year	4977	-2083 ( 2083 )	4186
beginning of year	8518	10601	6415
end of year	$ 13495	$ 8518	$ 10601
net change for the year from discontinued operations	$ 2013	$ -216 ( 216 )	$ 162

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the net change added to the 2007 costs?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net change in development costs from 2006 to 2007?
[Turn 2] what were development costs in 2007?
[Turn 3] what is the net change added to the 2007 costs?

Pre-table text:
supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) c o n t i n u e d summary of changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 sales and transfers of oil and gas produced , net of production , transportation and administrative costs $ ( 4887 ) $ ( 5312 ) $ ( 3754 ) net changes in prices and production , transportation and administrative costs related to future production 12845 ( 1342 ) 6648 .

Table:
( in millions )	2007	2006	2005
sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production transportation and administrative costs	$ -4887 ( 4887 )	$ -5312 ( 5312 )	$ -3754 ( 3754 )
net changes in prices and production transportation and administrative costs related to future production	12845	-1342 ( 1342 )	6648
extensions discoveries and improved recovery less related costs	1816	1290	700
development costs incurred during the period	1654	1251	1030
changes in estimated future development costs	-1727 ( 1727 )	-527 ( 527 )	-552 ( 552 )
revisions of previous quantity estimates	290	1319	820
net changes in purchases and sales of minerals in place	23	30	4557
accretion of discount	1726	1882	1124
net change in income taxes	-6751 ( 6751 )	-660 ( 660 )	-6694 ( 6694 )
timing and other	-12 ( 12 )	-14 ( 14 )	307
net change for the year	4977	-2083 ( 2083 )	4186
beginning of year	8518	10601	6415
end of year	$ 13495	$ 8518	$ 10601
net change for the year from discontinued operations	$ 2013	$ -216 ( 216 )	$ 162

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the connected fitness value in 2014?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the connected fitness value in 2014?

Pre-table text:
2022 net revenues in our connected fitness operating segment increased $ 34.2 million to $ 53.4 million in 2015 from $ 19.2 million in 2014 primarily due to revenues generated from our two connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 and growth in our existing connected fitness business .
operating income ( loss ) by segment is summarized below: .

Table:
( in thousands )	year ended december 31 , 2015	year ended december 31 , 2014	year ended december 31 , $ change	year ended december 31 , % (  % ) change
north america	$ 460961	$ 372347	$ 88614	23.8% ( 23.8 % )
emea	3122	-11763 ( 11763 )	14885	126.5
asia-pacific	36358	21858	14500	66.3
latin america	-30593 ( 30593 )	-15423 ( 15423 )	-15170 ( 15170 )	-98.4 ( 98.4 )
connected fitness	-61301 ( 61301 )	-13064 ( 13064 )	-48237 ( 48237 )	-369.2 ( 369.2 )
total operating income	$ 408547	$ 353955	$ 54592	15.4% ( 15.4 % )

Post-table text:
the increase in total operating income was driven by the following : 2022 operating income in our north america operating segment increased $ 88.6 million to $ 461.0 million in 2015 from $ 372.4 million in 2014 primarily due to the items discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .
2022 operating income in our emea operating segment increased $ 14.9 million to $ 3.1 million in 2015 from a loss of $ 11.8 million in 2014 primarily due to sales growth discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .
2022 operating income in our asia-pacific operating segment increased $ 14.5 million to $ 36.4 million in 2015 from $ 21.9 million in 2014 primarily due to sales growth discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .
2022 operating loss in our latin america operating segment increased $ 15.2 million to $ 30.6 million in 2015 from $ 15.4 million in 2014 primarily due to increased investments to support growth in the region and the economic challenges in brazil during the period .
this increase in operating loss was offset by sales growth discussed above .
2022 operating loss in our connected fitness segment increased $ 48.2 million to $ 61.3 million in 2015 from $ 13.1 million in 2014 primarily due to investments to support growth in our connected fitness business , including the impact of our two connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 .
these acquisitions contributed $ 23.6 million to the operating loss for the connected fitness segment in 2015 .
seasonality historically , we have recognized a majority of our net revenues and a significant portion of our income from operations in the last two quarters of the year , driven primarily by increased sales volume of our products during the fall selling season , including our higher priced cold weather products , along with a larger proportion of higher margin direct to consumer sales .
seasonality could have an impact on the timing of accruals if the sales in the last two quarters of the year do not materialize .
the level of our working capital generally reflects the seasonality and growth in our business .
we generally expect inventory , accounts payable and certain accrued expenses to be higher in the second and third quarters in preparation for the fall selling season. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is that divided by 1000?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the connected fitness value in 2014?
[Turn 2] what is that divided by 1000?

Pre-table text:
2022 net revenues in our connected fitness operating segment increased $ 34.2 million to $ 53.4 million in 2015 from $ 19.2 million in 2014 primarily due to revenues generated from our two connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 and growth in our existing connected fitness business .
operating income ( loss ) by segment is summarized below: .

Table:
( in thousands )	year ended december 31 , 2015	year ended december 31 , 2014	year ended december 31 , $ change	year ended december 31 , % (  % ) change
north america	$ 460961	$ 372347	$ 88614	23.8% ( 23.8 % )
emea	3122	-11763 ( 11763 )	14885	126.5
asia-pacific	36358	21858	14500	66.3
latin america	-30593 ( 30593 )	-15423 ( 15423 )	-15170 ( 15170 )	-98.4 ( 98.4 )
connected fitness	-61301 ( 61301 )	-13064 ( 13064 )	-48237 ( 48237 )	-369.2 ( 369.2 )
total operating income	$ 408547	$ 353955	$ 54592	15.4% ( 15.4 % )

Post-table text:
the increase in total operating income was driven by the following : 2022 operating income in our north america operating segment increased $ 88.6 million to $ 461.0 million in 2015 from $ 372.4 million in 2014 primarily due to the items discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .
2022 operating income in our emea operating segment increased $ 14.9 million to $ 3.1 million in 2015 from a loss of $ 11.8 million in 2014 primarily due to sales growth discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .
2022 operating income in our asia-pacific operating segment increased $ 14.5 million to $ 36.4 million in 2015 from $ 21.9 million in 2014 primarily due to sales growth discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .
2022 operating loss in our latin america operating segment increased $ 15.2 million to $ 30.6 million in 2015 from $ 15.4 million in 2014 primarily due to increased investments to support growth in the region and the economic challenges in brazil during the period .
this increase in operating loss was offset by sales growth discussed above .
2022 operating loss in our connected fitness segment increased $ 48.2 million to $ 61.3 million in 2015 from $ 13.1 million in 2014 primarily due to investments to support growth in our connected fitness business , including the impact of our two connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 .
these acquisitions contributed $ 23.6 million to the operating loss for the connected fitness segment in 2015 .
seasonality historically , we have recognized a majority of our net revenues and a significant portion of our income from operations in the last two quarters of the year , driven primarily by increased sales volume of our products during the fall selling season , including our higher priced cold weather products , along with a larger proportion of higher margin direct to consumer sales .
seasonality could have an impact on the timing of accruals if the sales in the last two quarters of the year do not materialize .
the level of our working capital generally reflects the seasonality and growth in our business .
we generally expect inventory , accounts payable and certain accrued expenses to be higher in the second and third quarters in preparation for the fall selling season. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is that divided by 2014 net revenues?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the connected fitness value in 2014?
[Turn 2] what is that divided by 1000?
[Turn 3] what is that divided by 2014 net revenues?

Pre-table text:
2022 net revenues in our connected fitness operating segment increased $ 34.2 million to $ 53.4 million in 2015 from $ 19.2 million in 2014 primarily due to revenues generated from our two connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 and growth in our existing connected fitness business .
operating income ( loss ) by segment is summarized below: .

Table:
( in thousands )	year ended december 31 , 2015	year ended december 31 , 2014	year ended december 31 , $ change	year ended december 31 , % (  % ) change
north america	$ 460961	$ 372347	$ 88614	23.8% ( 23.8 % )
emea	3122	-11763 ( 11763 )	14885	126.5
asia-pacific	36358	21858	14500	66.3
latin america	-30593 ( 30593 )	-15423 ( 15423 )	-15170 ( 15170 )	-98.4 ( 98.4 )
connected fitness	-61301 ( 61301 )	-13064 ( 13064 )	-48237 ( 48237 )	-369.2 ( 369.2 )
total operating income	$ 408547	$ 353955	$ 54592	15.4% ( 15.4 % )

Post-table text:
the increase in total operating income was driven by the following : 2022 operating income in our north america operating segment increased $ 88.6 million to $ 461.0 million in 2015 from $ 372.4 million in 2014 primarily due to the items discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .
2022 operating income in our emea operating segment increased $ 14.9 million to $ 3.1 million in 2015 from a loss of $ 11.8 million in 2014 primarily due to sales growth discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .
2022 operating income in our asia-pacific operating segment increased $ 14.5 million to $ 36.4 million in 2015 from $ 21.9 million in 2014 primarily due to sales growth discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .
2022 operating loss in our latin america operating segment increased $ 15.2 million to $ 30.6 million in 2015 from $ 15.4 million in 2014 primarily due to increased investments to support growth in the region and the economic challenges in brazil during the period .
this increase in operating loss was offset by sales growth discussed above .
2022 operating loss in our connected fitness segment increased $ 48.2 million to $ 61.3 million in 2015 from $ 13.1 million in 2014 primarily due to investments to support growth in our connected fitness business , including the impact of our two connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 .
these acquisitions contributed $ 23.6 million to the operating loss for the connected fitness segment in 2015 .
seasonality historically , we have recognized a majority of our net revenues and a significant portion of our income from operations in the last two quarters of the year , driven primarily by increased sales volume of our products during the fall selling season , including our higher priced cold weather products , along with a larger proportion of higher margin direct to consumer sales .
seasonality could have an impact on the timing of accruals if the sales in the last two quarters of the year do not materialize .
the level of our working capital generally reflects the seasonality and growth in our business .
we generally expect inventory , accounts payable and certain accrued expenses to be higher in the second and third quarters in preparation for the fall selling season. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the value of an investment in cadence design systems inc. in 2012?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of an investment in cadence design systems inc. in 2012?

Pre-table text:
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .
nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .
all rights reserved. .

Table:
	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

Post-table text:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the net change in value?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of an investment in cadence design systems inc. in 2012?
[Turn 2] what is the net change in value?

Pre-table text:
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .
nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .
all rights reserved. .

Table:
	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

Post-table text:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what rate of return does this represent?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of an investment in cadence design systems inc. in 2012?
[Turn 2] what is the net change in value?
[Turn 3] what rate of return does this represent?

Pre-table text:
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .
nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .
all rights reserved. .

Table:
	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

Post-table text:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what about the net change in value of an investment in nasdaq composite from 2007 to 2012?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of an investment in cadence design systems inc. in 2012?
[Turn 2] what is the net change in value?
[Turn 3] what rate of return does this represent?
[Turn 4] what about the net change in value of an investment in nasdaq composite from 2007 to 2012?

Pre-table text:
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .
nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .
all rights reserved. .

Table:
	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

Post-table text:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the rate of return for nasdaq composite?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of an investment in cadence design systems inc. in 2012?
[Turn 2] what is the net change in value?
[Turn 3] what rate of return does this represent?
[Turn 4] what about the net change in value of an investment in nasdaq composite from 2007 to 2012?
[Turn 5] what is the rate of return for nasdaq composite?

Pre-table text:
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .
nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .
all rights reserved. .

Table:
	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

Post-table text:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the difference in rate of return among these investments?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of an investment in cadence design systems inc. in 2012?
[Turn 2] what is the net change in value?
[Turn 3] what rate of return does this represent?
[Turn 4] what about the net change in value of an investment in nasdaq composite from 2007 to 2012?
[Turn 5] what is the rate of return for nasdaq composite?
[Turn 6] what is the difference in rate of return among these investments?

Pre-table text:
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .
nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .
all rights reserved. .

Table:
	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

Post-table text:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the total weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations in 2016 and 2017?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations in 2016 and 2017?

Pre-table text:
of prior service cost or credits , and net actuarial gains or losses ) as part of non-operating income .
we adopted the requirements of asu no .
2017-07 on january 1 , 2018 using the retrospective transition method .
we expect the adoption of asu no .
2017-07 to result in an increase to consolidated operating profit of $ 471 million and $ 846 million for 2016 and 2017 , respectively , and a corresponding decrease in non-operating income for each year .
we do not expect any impact to our business segment operating profit , our consolidated net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting asu no .
2017-07 .
intangibles-goodwill and other in january 2017 , the fasb issued asu no .
2017-04 , intangibles-goodwill and other ( topic 350 ) , which eliminates the requirement to compare the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill ( commonly referred to as step 2 ) from the goodwill impairment test .
the new standard does not change how a goodwill impairment is identified .
wewill continue to perform our quantitative and qualitative goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount , but if we are required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , under the new standard the amount of the charge will be calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s fair value from its carrying amount .
under the prior standard , if we were required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , step 2 required us to calculate the implied value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the amount of the charge was calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s implied fair value of goodwill from its actual goodwill balance .
the new standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2019 , with early adoption permitted , and should be applied prospectively from the date of adoption .
we elected to adopt the new standard for future goodwill impairment tests at the beginning of the third quarter of 2017 , because it significantly simplifies the evaluation of goodwill for impairment .
the impact of the new standard will depend on the outcomes of future goodwill impairment tests .
derivatives and hedging inaugust 2017 , the fasb issuedasu no .
2017-12derivatives and hedging ( topic 815 ) , which eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness .
the guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2018 , with early adoption permitted .
we do not expect a significant impact to our consolidated assets and liabilities , net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting this new standard .
we plan to adopt the new standard january 1 , 2019 .
leases in february 2016 , the fasb issuedasu no .
2016-02 , leases ( topic 842 ) , which requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements for both lessees and lessors .
the new standard is effective january 1 , 2019 for public companies , with early adoption permitted .
the new standard currently requires the application of a modified retrospective approach to the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements .
we are continuing to evaluate the expected impact to our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures .
we plan to adopt the new standard effective january 1 , 2019 .
note 2 2013 earnings per share theweighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common sharewere as follows ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2017	2016	2015
weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations	287.8	299.3	310.3
weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards	2.8	3.8	4.4
weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations	290.6	303.1	314.7

Post-table text:
we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respectiveweighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .
our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method .
there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .
note 3 2013 acquisitions and divestitures acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation on november 6 , 2015 , we completed the acquisition of sikorsky from united technologies corporation ( utc ) and certain of utc 2019s subsidiaries .
the purchase price of the acquisition was $ 9.0 billion , net of cash acquired .
as a result of the acquisition .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and including the value for 2015?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations in 2016 and 2017?
[Turn 2] and including the value for 2015?

Pre-table text:
of prior service cost or credits , and net actuarial gains or losses ) as part of non-operating income .
we adopted the requirements of asu no .
2017-07 on january 1 , 2018 using the retrospective transition method .
we expect the adoption of asu no .
2017-07 to result in an increase to consolidated operating profit of $ 471 million and $ 846 million for 2016 and 2017 , respectively , and a corresponding decrease in non-operating income for each year .
we do not expect any impact to our business segment operating profit , our consolidated net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting asu no .
2017-07 .
intangibles-goodwill and other in january 2017 , the fasb issued asu no .
2017-04 , intangibles-goodwill and other ( topic 350 ) , which eliminates the requirement to compare the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill ( commonly referred to as step 2 ) from the goodwill impairment test .
the new standard does not change how a goodwill impairment is identified .
wewill continue to perform our quantitative and qualitative goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount , but if we are required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , under the new standard the amount of the charge will be calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s fair value from its carrying amount .
under the prior standard , if we were required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , step 2 required us to calculate the implied value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the amount of the charge was calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s implied fair value of goodwill from its actual goodwill balance .
the new standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2019 , with early adoption permitted , and should be applied prospectively from the date of adoption .
we elected to adopt the new standard for future goodwill impairment tests at the beginning of the third quarter of 2017 , because it significantly simplifies the evaluation of goodwill for impairment .
the impact of the new standard will depend on the outcomes of future goodwill impairment tests .
derivatives and hedging inaugust 2017 , the fasb issuedasu no .
2017-12derivatives and hedging ( topic 815 ) , which eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness .
the guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2018 , with early adoption permitted .
we do not expect a significant impact to our consolidated assets and liabilities , net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting this new standard .
we plan to adopt the new standard january 1 , 2019 .
leases in february 2016 , the fasb issuedasu no .
2016-02 , leases ( topic 842 ) , which requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements for both lessees and lessors .
the new standard is effective january 1 , 2019 for public companies , with early adoption permitted .
the new standard currently requires the application of a modified retrospective approach to the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements .
we are continuing to evaluate the expected impact to our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures .
we plan to adopt the new standard effective january 1 , 2019 .
note 2 2013 earnings per share theweighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common sharewere as follows ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2017	2016	2015
weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations	287.8	299.3	310.3
weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards	2.8	3.8	4.4
weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations	290.6	303.1	314.7

Post-table text:
we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respectiveweighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .
our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method .
there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .
note 3 2013 acquisitions and divestitures acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation on november 6 , 2015 , we completed the acquisition of sikorsky from united technologies corporation ( utc ) and certain of utc 2019s subsidiaries .
the purchase price of the acquisition was $ 9.0 billion , net of cash acquired .
as a result of the acquisition .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
so what was the average during this time?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations in 2016 and 2017?
[Turn 2] and including the value for 2015?
[Turn 3] so what was the average during this time?

Pre-table text:
of prior service cost or credits , and net actuarial gains or losses ) as part of non-operating income .
we adopted the requirements of asu no .
2017-07 on january 1 , 2018 using the retrospective transition method .
we expect the adoption of asu no .
2017-07 to result in an increase to consolidated operating profit of $ 471 million and $ 846 million for 2016 and 2017 , respectively , and a corresponding decrease in non-operating income for each year .
we do not expect any impact to our business segment operating profit , our consolidated net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting asu no .
2017-07 .
intangibles-goodwill and other in january 2017 , the fasb issued asu no .
2017-04 , intangibles-goodwill and other ( topic 350 ) , which eliminates the requirement to compare the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill ( commonly referred to as step 2 ) from the goodwill impairment test .
the new standard does not change how a goodwill impairment is identified .
wewill continue to perform our quantitative and qualitative goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount , but if we are required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , under the new standard the amount of the charge will be calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s fair value from its carrying amount .
under the prior standard , if we were required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , step 2 required us to calculate the implied value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the amount of the charge was calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s implied fair value of goodwill from its actual goodwill balance .
the new standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2019 , with early adoption permitted , and should be applied prospectively from the date of adoption .
we elected to adopt the new standard for future goodwill impairment tests at the beginning of the third quarter of 2017 , because it significantly simplifies the evaluation of goodwill for impairment .
the impact of the new standard will depend on the outcomes of future goodwill impairment tests .
derivatives and hedging inaugust 2017 , the fasb issuedasu no .
2017-12derivatives and hedging ( topic 815 ) , which eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness .
the guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2018 , with early adoption permitted .
we do not expect a significant impact to our consolidated assets and liabilities , net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting this new standard .
we plan to adopt the new standard january 1 , 2019 .
leases in february 2016 , the fasb issuedasu no .
2016-02 , leases ( topic 842 ) , which requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements for both lessees and lessors .
the new standard is effective january 1 , 2019 for public companies , with early adoption permitted .
the new standard currently requires the application of a modified retrospective approach to the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements .
we are continuing to evaluate the expected impact to our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures .
we plan to adopt the new standard effective january 1 , 2019 .
note 2 2013 earnings per share theweighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common sharewere as follows ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2017	2016	2015
weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations	287.8	299.3	310.3
weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards	2.8	3.8	4.4
weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations	290.6	303.1	314.7

Post-table text:
we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respectiveweighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .
our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method .
there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .
note 3 2013 acquisitions and divestitures acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation on november 6 , 2015 , we completed the acquisition of sikorsky from united technologies corporation ( utc ) and certain of utc 2019s subsidiaries .
the purchase price of the acquisition was $ 9.0 billion , net of cash acquired .
as a result of the acquisition .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
how much did the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations change between 2016 and 2017?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations in 2016 and 2017?
[Turn 2] and including the value for 2015?
[Turn 3] so what was the average during this time?
[Turn 4] how much did the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations change between 2016 and 2017?

Pre-table text:
of prior service cost or credits , and net actuarial gains or losses ) as part of non-operating income .
we adopted the requirements of asu no .
2017-07 on january 1 , 2018 using the retrospective transition method .
we expect the adoption of asu no .
2017-07 to result in an increase to consolidated operating profit of $ 471 million and $ 846 million for 2016 and 2017 , respectively , and a corresponding decrease in non-operating income for each year .
we do not expect any impact to our business segment operating profit , our consolidated net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting asu no .
2017-07 .
intangibles-goodwill and other in january 2017 , the fasb issued asu no .
2017-04 , intangibles-goodwill and other ( topic 350 ) , which eliminates the requirement to compare the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill ( commonly referred to as step 2 ) from the goodwill impairment test .
the new standard does not change how a goodwill impairment is identified .
wewill continue to perform our quantitative and qualitative goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount , but if we are required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , under the new standard the amount of the charge will be calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s fair value from its carrying amount .
under the prior standard , if we were required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , step 2 required us to calculate the implied value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the amount of the charge was calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s implied fair value of goodwill from its actual goodwill balance .
the new standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2019 , with early adoption permitted , and should be applied prospectively from the date of adoption .
we elected to adopt the new standard for future goodwill impairment tests at the beginning of the third quarter of 2017 , because it significantly simplifies the evaluation of goodwill for impairment .
the impact of the new standard will depend on the outcomes of future goodwill impairment tests .
derivatives and hedging inaugust 2017 , the fasb issuedasu no .
2017-12derivatives and hedging ( topic 815 ) , which eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness .
the guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2018 , with early adoption permitted .
we do not expect a significant impact to our consolidated assets and liabilities , net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting this new standard .
we plan to adopt the new standard january 1 , 2019 .
leases in february 2016 , the fasb issuedasu no .
2016-02 , leases ( topic 842 ) , which requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements for both lessees and lessors .
the new standard is effective january 1 , 2019 for public companies , with early adoption permitted .
the new standard currently requires the application of a modified retrospective approach to the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements .
we are continuing to evaluate the expected impact to our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures .
we plan to adopt the new standard effective january 1 , 2019 .
note 2 2013 earnings per share theweighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common sharewere as follows ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2017	2016	2015
weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations	287.8	299.3	310.3
weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards	2.8	3.8	4.4
weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations	290.6	303.1	314.7

Post-table text:
we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respectiveweighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .
our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method .
there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .
note 3 2013 acquisitions and divestitures acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation on november 6 , 2015 , we completed the acquisition of sikorsky from united technologies corporation ( utc ) and certain of utc 2019s subsidiaries .
the purchase price of the acquisition was $ 9.0 billion , net of cash acquired .
as a result of the acquisition .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the sum of interest only product in 2012 and principal and interest product in 2012?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the sum of interest only product in 2012 and principal and interest product in 2012?

Pre-table text:
generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term .
during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest .
based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2011 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end .
home equity lines of credit - draw period end dates in millions interest only product principal and interest product .

Table:
in millions	interest only product	principal and interest product
2012	$ 904	$ 266
2013	1211	331
2014	2043	598
2015	1988	820
2016 and thereafter	6961	5601
total ( a )	$ 13107	$ 7616

Post-table text:
( a ) includes approximately $ 306 million , $ 44 million , $ 60 million , $ 100 million , and $ 246 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , and 2016 and thereafter , respectively .
we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments .
based upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2011 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 4.32% ( 4.32 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.57% ( 5.57 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due .
generally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated .
at that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr .
see note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information .
loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate .
initially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program .
if a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program .
our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal .
temporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs .
further , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs .
additional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .
a temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to the original loan terms as of a specific date or the occurrence of an event , such as a failure to pay in accordance with the terms of the modification .
typically , these modifications are for a period of up to 24 months after which the interest rate reverts to the original loan rate .
a permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed .
permanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs .
for consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance .
examples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment .
permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made .
residential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months .
we also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses .
the following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months and twelve months after the modification date .
78 the pnc financial services group , inc .
2013 form 10-k .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the value of principal and interest product in 2012?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the sum of interest only product in 2012 and principal and interest product in 2012?
[Turn 2] what is the value of principal and interest product in 2012?

Pre-table text:
generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term .
during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest .
based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2011 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end .
home equity lines of credit - draw period end dates in millions interest only product principal and interest product .

Table:
in millions	interest only product	principal and interest product
2012	$ 904	$ 266
2013	1211	331
2014	2043	598
2015	1988	820
2016 and thereafter	6961	5601
total ( a )	$ 13107	$ 7616

Post-table text:
( a ) includes approximately $ 306 million , $ 44 million , $ 60 million , $ 100 million , and $ 246 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , and 2016 and thereafter , respectively .
we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments .
based upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2011 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 4.32% ( 4.32 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.57% ( 5.57 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due .
generally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated .
at that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr .
see note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information .
loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate .
initially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program .
if a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program .
our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal .
temporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs .
further , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs .
additional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .
a temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to the original loan terms as of a specific date or the occurrence of an event , such as a failure to pay in accordance with the terms of the modification .
typically , these modifications are for a period of up to 24 months after which the interest rate reverts to the original loan rate .
a permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed .
permanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs .
for consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance .
examples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment .
permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made .
residential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months .
we also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses .
the following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months and twelve months after the modification date .
78 the pnc financial services group , inc .
2013 form 10-k .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is that value over the sum of both product values?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the sum of interest only product in 2012 and principal and interest product in 2012?
[Turn 2] what is the value of principal and interest product in 2012?
[Turn 3] what is that value over the sum of both product values?

Pre-table text:
generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term .
during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest .
based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2011 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end .
home equity lines of credit - draw period end dates in millions interest only product principal and interest product .

Table:
in millions	interest only product	principal and interest product
2012	$ 904	$ 266
2013	1211	331
2014	2043	598
2015	1988	820
2016 and thereafter	6961	5601
total ( a )	$ 13107	$ 7616

Post-table text:
( a ) includes approximately $ 306 million , $ 44 million , $ 60 million , $ 100 million , and $ 246 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , and 2016 and thereafter , respectively .
we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments .
based upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2011 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 4.32% ( 4.32 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.57% ( 5.57 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due .
generally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated .
at that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr .
see note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information .
loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate .
initially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program .
if a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program .
our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal .
temporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs .
further , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs .
additional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .
a temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to the original loan terms as of a specific date or the occurrence of an event , such as a failure to pay in accordance with the terms of the modification .
typically , these modifications are for a period of up to 24 months after which the interest rate reverts to the original loan rate .
a permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed .
permanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs .
for consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance .
examples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment .
permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made .
residential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months .
we also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses .
the following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months and twelve months after the modification date .
78 the pnc financial services group , inc .
2013 form 10-k .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the net change in revenue from 2006 to 2007?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net change in revenue from 2006 to 2007?

Pre-table text:
entergy texas , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in power purchases as a result of the purchased power agreements between entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas and an increase in the average market prices of purchased power and natural gas , substantially offset by a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of decreased recovery from customers of fuel costs .
other regulatory charges increased primarily due to an increase of $ 6.9 million in the recovery of bond expenses related to the securitization bonds .
the recovery became effective july 2007 .
see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds .
2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2006 net revenue	$ 403.3
purchased power capacity	13.1
securitization transition charge	9.9
volume/weather	9.7
transmission revenue	6.1
base revenue	2.6
other	-2.4 ( 2.4 )
2007 net revenue	$ 442.3

Post-table text:
the purchased power capacity variance is due to changes in the purchased power capacity costs included in the calculation in 2007 compared to 2006 used to bill generation costs between entergy texas and entergy gulf states louisiana .
the securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds .
as discussed above , in june 2007 , egsrf i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds .
see note 5 to the financial statements herein for details of the securitization bond issuance .
the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage on billed retail sales , including the effects of more favorable weather in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 .
the increase is also due to an increase in usage during the unbilled sales period .
retail electricity usage increased a total of 139 gwh in all sectors .
see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues .
the transmission revenue variance is due to an increase in rates effective june 2007 and new transmission customers in late 2006 .
the base revenue variance is due to the transition to competition rider that began in march 2006 .
refer to note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate increase .
gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $ 179 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates and fuel refunds .
the decrease was partially offset by the $ 39 million increase in net revenue described above and an increase of $ 44 million in wholesale revenues , including $ 30 million from the system agreement cost equalization payments from entergy arkansas .
the receipt of such payments is being .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the 2007 transmission revenue divided by that net change?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net change in revenue from 2006 to 2007?
[Turn 2] what is the 2007 transmission revenue divided by that net change?

Pre-table text:
entergy texas , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in power purchases as a result of the purchased power agreements between entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas and an increase in the average market prices of purchased power and natural gas , substantially offset by a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of decreased recovery from customers of fuel costs .
other regulatory charges increased primarily due to an increase of $ 6.9 million in the recovery of bond expenses related to the securitization bonds .
the recovery became effective july 2007 .
see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds .
2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2006 net revenue	$ 403.3
purchased power capacity	13.1
securitization transition charge	9.9
volume/weather	9.7
transmission revenue	6.1
base revenue	2.6
other	-2.4 ( 2.4 )
2007 net revenue	$ 442.3

Post-table text:
the purchased power capacity variance is due to changes in the purchased power capacity costs included in the calculation in 2007 compared to 2006 used to bill generation costs between entergy texas and entergy gulf states louisiana .
the securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds .
as discussed above , in june 2007 , egsrf i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds .
see note 5 to the financial statements herein for details of the securitization bond issuance .
the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage on billed retail sales , including the effects of more favorable weather in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 .
the increase is also due to an increase in usage during the unbilled sales period .
retail electricity usage increased a total of 139 gwh in all sectors .
see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues .
the transmission revenue variance is due to an increase in rates effective june 2007 and new transmission customers in late 2006 .
the base revenue variance is due to the transition to competition rider that began in march 2006 .
refer to note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate increase .
gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $ 179 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates and fuel refunds .
the decrease was partially offset by the $ 39 million increase in net revenue described above and an increase of $ 44 million in wholesale revenues , including $ 30 million from the system agreement cost equalization payments from entergy arkansas .
the receipt of such payments is being .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.