[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the change in rd&e spendings from 2013 to 2014?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in rd&e spendings from 2013 to 2014?

Pre-table text:
backlog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments .
backlog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months .
backlog by reportable segment as of october 27 , 2013 and october 28 , 2012 was as follows : 2013 2012 ( in millions , except percentages ) .

Table:
	2013	2012		( in millions except percentages )
silicon systems group	$ 1295	55% ( 55 % )	$ 705	44% ( 44 % )
applied global services	591	25% ( 25 % )	580	36% ( 36 % )
display	361	15% ( 15 % )	206	13% ( 13 % )
energy and environmental solutions	125	5% ( 5 % )	115	7% ( 7 % )
total	$ 2372	100% ( 100 % )	$ 1606	100% ( 100 % )

Post-table text:
applied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or cancellation of orders .
customers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties .
delays in delivery schedules and/or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations .
manufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies ( collectively , parts ) that are used to manufacture systems .
applied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including the united states , europe , israel , singapore , taiwan , and other countries in asia , and assembly of some systems is completed at customer sites .
applied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products .
although applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible .
accordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers .
applied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by : ( 1 ) selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; ( 2 ) monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; ( 3 ) maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; ( 4 ) qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ( 5 ) locating certain manufacturing operations in close proximity to suppliers and customers .
research , development and engineering applied 2019s long-term growth strategy requires continued development of new products .
the company 2019s significant investment in research , development and engineering ( rd&e ) has generally enabled it to deliver new products and technologies before the emergence of strong demand , thus allowing customers to incorporate these products into their manufacturing plans at an early stage in the technology selection cycle .
applied works closely with its global customers to design systems and processes that meet their planned technical and production requirements .
product development and engineering organizations are located primarily in the united states , as well as in europe , israel , taiwan , and china .
in addition , applied outsources certain rd&e activities , some of which are performed outside the united states , primarily in india .
process support and customer demonstration laboratories are located in the united states , china , taiwan , europe , and israel .
applied 2019s investments in rd&e for product development and engineering programs to create or improve products and technologies over the last three years were as follows : $ 1.3 billion ( 18 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2013 , $ 1.2 billion ( 14 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2012 , and $ 1.1 billion ( 11 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2011 .
applied has spent an average of 14 percent of net sales in rd&e over the last five years .
in addition to rd&e for specific product technologies , applied maintains ongoing programs for automation control systems , materials research , and environmental control that are applicable to its products. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and how much does this change represent in relation to those spendings in 2013, in percentage?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in rd&e spendings from 2013 to 2014?
[Turn 2] and how much does this change represent in relation to those spendings in 2013, in percentage?

Pre-table text:
backlog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments .
backlog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months .
backlog by reportable segment as of october 27 , 2013 and october 28 , 2012 was as follows : 2013 2012 ( in millions , except percentages ) .

Table:
	2013	2012		( in millions except percentages )
silicon systems group	$ 1295	55% ( 55 % )	$ 705	44% ( 44 % )
applied global services	591	25% ( 25 % )	580	36% ( 36 % )
display	361	15% ( 15 % )	206	13% ( 13 % )
energy and environmental solutions	125	5% ( 5 % )	115	7% ( 7 % )
total	$ 2372	100% ( 100 % )	$ 1606	100% ( 100 % )

Post-table text:
applied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or cancellation of orders .
customers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties .
delays in delivery schedules and/or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations .
manufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies ( collectively , parts ) that are used to manufacture systems .
applied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including the united states , europe , israel , singapore , taiwan , and other countries in asia , and assembly of some systems is completed at customer sites .
applied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products .
although applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible .
accordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers .
applied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by : ( 1 ) selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; ( 2 ) monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; ( 3 ) maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; ( 4 ) qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ( 5 ) locating certain manufacturing operations in close proximity to suppliers and customers .
research , development and engineering applied 2019s long-term growth strategy requires continued development of new products .
the company 2019s significant investment in research , development and engineering ( rd&e ) has generally enabled it to deliver new products and technologies before the emergence of strong demand , thus allowing customers to incorporate these products into their manufacturing plans at an early stage in the technology selection cycle .
applied works closely with its global customers to design systems and processes that meet their planned technical and production requirements .
product development and engineering organizations are located primarily in the united states , as well as in europe , israel , taiwan , and china .
in addition , applied outsources certain rd&e activities , some of which are performed outside the united states , primarily in india .
process support and customer demonstration laboratories are located in the united states , china , taiwan , europe , and israel .
applied 2019s investments in rd&e for product development and engineering programs to create or improve products and technologies over the last three years were as follows : $ 1.3 billion ( 18 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2013 , $ 1.2 billion ( 14 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2012 , and $ 1.1 billion ( 11 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2011 .
applied has spent an average of 14 percent of net sales in rd&e over the last five years .
in addition to rd&e for specific product technologies , applied maintains ongoing programs for automation control systems , materials research , and environmental control that are applicable to its products. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the difference in accrued wages and vacation between 2007 and 2008?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the difference in accrued wages and vacation between 2007 and 2008?

Pre-table text:
when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use .
however , many of our assets are self-constructed .
a large portion of our capital expenditures is for track structure expansion ( capacity projects ) and replacement ( program projects ) , which is typically performed by our employees .
approximately 13% ( 13 % ) of our full-time equivalent employees are dedicated to the construction of capital assets .
costs that are directly attributable or overhead costs that relate directly to capital projects are capitalized .
direct costs that are capitalized as part of self-constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment .
indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset .
these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases .
the capitalization of indirect costs is consistent with fasb statement no .
67 , accounting for costs and initial rental operations of real estate projects .
general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred .
normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized .
assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .
amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .
10 .
accounts payable and other current liabilities dec .
31 , dec .
31 , millions of dollars 2008 2007 .

Table:
millions of dollars	dec . 31 2008	dec . 31 2007
accounts payable	$ 629	$ 732
accrued wages and vacation	367	394
accrued casualty costs	390	371
income and other taxes	207	343
dividends and interest	328	284
equipment rents payable	93	103
other	546	675
total accounts payable and other current liabilities	$ 2560	$ 2902

Post-table text:
11 .
fair value measurements during the first quarter of 2008 , we fully adopted fasb statement no .
157 , fair value measurements ( fas 157 ) .
fas 157 established a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements .
the adoption of fas 157 had no impact on our financial position or results of operations .
fas 157 applies to all assets and liabilities that are measured and reported on a fair value basis .
this enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values .
the statement requires that each asset and liability carried at fair value be classified into one of the following categories : level 1 : quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities .
level 2 : observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data .
level 3 : unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
so what was the percentage change over this time?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the difference in accrued wages and vacation between 2007 and 2008?
[Turn 2] so what was the percentage change over this time?

Pre-table text:
when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use .
however , many of our assets are self-constructed .
a large portion of our capital expenditures is for track structure expansion ( capacity projects ) and replacement ( program projects ) , which is typically performed by our employees .
approximately 13% ( 13 % ) of our full-time equivalent employees are dedicated to the construction of capital assets .
costs that are directly attributable or overhead costs that relate directly to capital projects are capitalized .
direct costs that are capitalized as part of self-constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment .
indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset .
these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases .
the capitalization of indirect costs is consistent with fasb statement no .
67 , accounting for costs and initial rental operations of real estate projects .
general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred .
normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized .
assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .
amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .
10 .
accounts payable and other current liabilities dec .
31 , dec .
31 , millions of dollars 2008 2007 .

Table:
millions of dollars	dec . 31 2008	dec . 31 2007
accounts payable	$ 629	$ 732
accrued wages and vacation	367	394
accrued casualty costs	390	371
income and other taxes	207	343
dividends and interest	328	284
equipment rents payable	93	103
other	546	675
total accounts payable and other current liabilities	$ 2560	$ 2902

Post-table text:
11 .
fair value measurements during the first quarter of 2008 , we fully adopted fasb statement no .
157 , fair value measurements ( fas 157 ) .
fas 157 established a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements .
the adoption of fas 157 had no impact on our financial position or results of operations .
fas 157 applies to all assets and liabilities that are measured and reported on a fair value basis .
this enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values .
the statement requires that each asset and liability carried at fair value be classified into one of the following categories : level 1 : quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities .
level 2 : observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data .
level 3 : unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the percentage of total commitments that expire in less than a year?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the percentage of total commitments that expire in less than a year?

Pre-table text:
page 38 five years .
the amounts ultimately applied against our offset agreements are based on negotiations with the customer and generally require cash outlays that represent only a fraction of the original amount in the offset agreement .
at december 31 , 2005 , we had outstanding offset agreements totaling $ 8.4 bil- lion , primarily related to our aeronautics segment , that extend through 2015 .
to the extent we have entered into purchase obligations at december 31 , 2005 that also satisfy offset agree- ments , those amounts are included in the preceding table .
we have entered into standby letter of credit agreements and other arrangements with financial institutions and custom- ers mainly relating to advances received from customers and/or the guarantee of future performance on some of our contracts .
at december 31 , 2005 , we had outstanding letters of credit , surety bonds and guarantees , as follows : commitment expiration by period ( in millions ) commitment 1 year ( a ) years ( a ) standby letters of credit $ 2630 $ 2425 $ 171 $ 18 $ 16 .

Table:
( in millions )	commitment expiration by period total commitment	commitment expiration by period less than 1 year ( a )	commitment expiration by period 1-3 years ( a )	commitment expiration by period 3-5 years	commitment expiration by period after 5 years
standby letters of credit	$ 2630	$ 2425	$ 171	$ 18	$ 16
surety bonds	434	79	352	3	2014
guarantees	2	1	1	2014	2014
total commitments	$ 3066	$ 2505	$ 524	$ 21	$ 16

Post-table text:
( a ) approximately $ 2262 million and $ 49 million of standby letters of credit in the 201cless than 1 year 201d and 201c1-3 year 201d periods , respectively , and approximately $ 38 million of surety bonds in the 201cless than 1 year 201d period are expected to renew for additional periods until completion of the contractual obligation .
included in the table above is approximately $ 200 million representing letter of credit and surety bond amounts for which related obligations or liabilities are also recorded in the bal- ance sheet , either as reductions of inventories , as customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred , or as other liabilities .
approximately $ 2 billion of the standby letters of credit in the table above were to secure advance payments received under an f-16 contract from an international cus- tomer .
these letters of credit are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance , and the amount available will be reduced as certain events occur throughout the period of performance in accordance with the contract terms .
similar to the letters of credit for the f-16 contract , other letters of credit and surety bonds are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance .
at december 31 , 2005 , we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements as those arrangements are defined by the securities and exchange commission ( sec ) .
quantitative and qualitative disclosure of market risk our main exposure to market risk relates to interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates .
our financial instruments that are subject to interest rate risk principally include fixed- rate and floating rate long-term debt .
if interest rates were to change by plus or minus 1% ( 1 % ) , interest expense would increase or decrease by approximately $ 10 million related to our float- ing rate debt .
the estimated fair values of the corporation 2019s long-term debt instruments at december 31 , 2005 aggregated approximately $ 6.2 billion , compared with a carrying amount of approximately $ 5.0 billion .
the majority of our long-term debt obligations are not callable until maturity .
we have used interest rate swaps in the past to manage our exposure to fixed and variable interest rates ; however , at year-end 2005 , we had no such agreements in place .
we use forward foreign exchange contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates , and do so in ways that qualify for hedge accounting treatment .
these exchange contracts hedge the fluctuations in cash flows associated with firm commitments or specific anticipated transactions contracted in foreign currencies , or hedge the exposure to rate changes affecting foreign currency denomi- nated assets or liabilities .
related gains and losses on these contracts , to the extent they are effective hedges , are recog- nized in income at the same time the hedged transaction is recognized or when the hedged asset or liability is adjusted .
to the extent the hedges are ineffective , gains and losses on the contracts are recognized in the current period .
at december 31 , 2005 , the fair value of forward exchange con- tracts outstanding , as well as the amounts of gains and losses recorded during the year then ended , were not material .
we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trad- ing or speculative purposes .
recent accounting pronouncements in december 2004 , the fasb issued fas 123 ( r ) , share- based payments , which will impact our net earnings and earn- ings per share and change the classification of certain elements of the statement of cash flows .
fas 123 ( r ) requires stock options and other share-based payments made to employees to be accounted for as compensation expense and recorded at fair lockheed martin corporation management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations december 31 , 2005 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what percentage of total commitments expire in 1-3 years?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the percentage of total commitments that expire in less than a year?
[Turn 2] what percentage of total commitments expire in 1-3 years?

Pre-table text:
page 38 five years .
the amounts ultimately applied against our offset agreements are based on negotiations with the customer and generally require cash outlays that represent only a fraction of the original amount in the offset agreement .
at december 31 , 2005 , we had outstanding offset agreements totaling $ 8.4 bil- lion , primarily related to our aeronautics segment , that extend through 2015 .
to the extent we have entered into purchase obligations at december 31 , 2005 that also satisfy offset agree- ments , those amounts are included in the preceding table .
we have entered into standby letter of credit agreements and other arrangements with financial institutions and custom- ers mainly relating to advances received from customers and/or the guarantee of future performance on some of our contracts .
at december 31 , 2005 , we had outstanding letters of credit , surety bonds and guarantees , as follows : commitment expiration by period ( in millions ) commitment 1 year ( a ) years ( a ) standby letters of credit $ 2630 $ 2425 $ 171 $ 18 $ 16 .

Table:
( in millions )	commitment expiration by period total commitment	commitment expiration by period less than 1 year ( a )	commitment expiration by period 1-3 years ( a )	commitment expiration by period 3-5 years	commitment expiration by period after 5 years
standby letters of credit	$ 2630	$ 2425	$ 171	$ 18	$ 16
surety bonds	434	79	352	3	2014
guarantees	2	1	1	2014	2014
total commitments	$ 3066	$ 2505	$ 524	$ 21	$ 16

Post-table text:
( a ) approximately $ 2262 million and $ 49 million of standby letters of credit in the 201cless than 1 year 201d and 201c1-3 year 201d periods , respectively , and approximately $ 38 million of surety bonds in the 201cless than 1 year 201d period are expected to renew for additional periods until completion of the contractual obligation .
included in the table above is approximately $ 200 million representing letter of credit and surety bond amounts for which related obligations or liabilities are also recorded in the bal- ance sheet , either as reductions of inventories , as customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred , or as other liabilities .
approximately $ 2 billion of the standby letters of credit in the table above were to secure advance payments received under an f-16 contract from an international cus- tomer .
these letters of credit are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance , and the amount available will be reduced as certain events occur throughout the period of performance in accordance with the contract terms .
similar to the letters of credit for the f-16 contract , other letters of credit and surety bonds are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance .
at december 31 , 2005 , we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements as those arrangements are defined by the securities and exchange commission ( sec ) .
quantitative and qualitative disclosure of market risk our main exposure to market risk relates to interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates .
our financial instruments that are subject to interest rate risk principally include fixed- rate and floating rate long-term debt .
if interest rates were to change by plus or minus 1% ( 1 % ) , interest expense would increase or decrease by approximately $ 10 million related to our float- ing rate debt .
the estimated fair values of the corporation 2019s long-term debt instruments at december 31 , 2005 aggregated approximately $ 6.2 billion , compared with a carrying amount of approximately $ 5.0 billion .
the majority of our long-term debt obligations are not callable until maturity .
we have used interest rate swaps in the past to manage our exposure to fixed and variable interest rates ; however , at year-end 2005 , we had no such agreements in place .
we use forward foreign exchange contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates , and do so in ways that qualify for hedge accounting treatment .
these exchange contracts hedge the fluctuations in cash flows associated with firm commitments or specific anticipated transactions contracted in foreign currencies , or hedge the exposure to rate changes affecting foreign currency denomi- nated assets or liabilities .
related gains and losses on these contracts , to the extent they are effective hedges , are recog- nized in income at the same time the hedged transaction is recognized or when the hedged asset or liability is adjusted .
to the extent the hedges are ineffective , gains and losses on the contracts are recognized in the current period .
at december 31 , 2005 , the fair value of forward exchange con- tracts outstanding , as well as the amounts of gains and losses recorded during the year then ended , were not material .
we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trad- ing or speculative purposes .
recent accounting pronouncements in december 2004 , the fasb issued fas 123 ( r ) , share- based payments , which will impact our net earnings and earn- ings per share and change the classification of certain elements of the statement of cash flows .
fas 123 ( r ) requires stock options and other share-based payments made to employees to be accounted for as compensation expense and recorded at fair lockheed martin corporation management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations december 31 , 2005 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the change in the net revenue from 2012 to 2013?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the net revenue from 2012 to 2013?

Pre-table text:
item 7 .
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations our management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) is provided in addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations , financial condition , and cash flows .
md&a is organized as follows : 2022 overview .
discussion of our business and overall analysis of financial and other highlights affecting the company in order to provide context for the remainder of md&a .
2022 critical accounting estimates .
accounting estimates that we believe are most important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results and forecasts .
2022 results of operations .
an analysis of our financial results comparing 2013 to 2012 and comparing 2012 to 2022 liquidity and capital resources .
an analysis of changes in our balance sheets and cash flows , and discussion of our financial condition and potential sources of liquidity .
2022 fair value of financial instruments .
discussion of the methodologies used in the valuation of our financial instruments .
2022 contractual obligations and off-balance-sheet arrangements .
overview of contractual obligations , contingent liabilities , commitments , and off-balance-sheet arrangements outstanding as of december 28 , 2013 , including expected payment schedule .
the various sections of this md&a contain a number of forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties .
words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cseeks , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201ccontinues , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cshould , 201d and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements .
in addition , any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance , our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses , uncertain events or assumptions , and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements .
such statements are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this filing and particularly in 201crisk factors 201d in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k .
our actual results may differ materially , and these forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any divestitures , mergers , acquisitions , or other business combinations that had not been completed as of february 14 , 2014 .
overview our results of operations for each period were as follows: .

Table:
( dollars in millions except per share amounts )	three months ended dec . 282013	three months ended sept . 282013	three months ended change	three months ended dec . 282013	three months ended dec . 292012	change
net revenue	$ 13834	$ 13483	$ 351	$ 52708	$ 53341	$ -633 ( 633 )
gross margin	$ 8571	$ 8414	$ 157	$ 31521	$ 33151	$ -1630 ( 1630 )
gross margin percentage	62.0% ( 62.0 % )	62.4% ( 62.4 % )	( 0.4 ) % (  % )	59.8% ( 59.8 % )	62.1% ( 62.1 % )	( 2.3 ) % (  % )
operating income	$ 3549	$ 3504	$ 45	$ 12291	$ 14638	$ -2347 ( 2347 )
net income	$ 2625	$ 2950	$ -325 ( 325 )	$ 9620	$ 11005	$ -1385 ( 1385 )
diluted earnings per common share	$ 0.51	$ 0.58	$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )	$ 1.89	$ 2.13	$ -0.24 ( 0.24 )

Post-table text:
revenue for 2013 was down 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 .
pccg experienced lower platform unit sales in the first half of the year , but saw offsetting growth in the back half as the pc market began to show signs of stabilization .
dcg continued to benefit from the build out of internet cloud computing and the strength of our product portfolio resulting in increased platform volumes for dcg for the year .
higher factory start-up costs for our next-generation 14nm process technology led to a decrease in gross margin compared to 2012 .
in response to the current business environment and to better align resources , management approved several restructuring actions including targeted workforce reductions as well as the exit of certain businesses and facilities .
these actions resulted in restructuring and asset impairment charges of $ 240 million for 2013 .
table of contents .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was that net revenue in 2012?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the net revenue from 2012 to 2013?
[Turn 2] and what was that net revenue in 2012?

Pre-table text:
item 7 .
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations our management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) is provided in addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations , financial condition , and cash flows .
md&a is organized as follows : 2022 overview .
discussion of our business and overall analysis of financial and other highlights affecting the company in order to provide context for the remainder of md&a .
2022 critical accounting estimates .
accounting estimates that we believe are most important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results and forecasts .
2022 results of operations .
an analysis of our financial results comparing 2013 to 2012 and comparing 2012 to 2022 liquidity and capital resources .
an analysis of changes in our balance sheets and cash flows , and discussion of our financial condition and potential sources of liquidity .
2022 fair value of financial instruments .
discussion of the methodologies used in the valuation of our financial instruments .
2022 contractual obligations and off-balance-sheet arrangements .
overview of contractual obligations , contingent liabilities , commitments , and off-balance-sheet arrangements outstanding as of december 28 , 2013 , including expected payment schedule .
the various sections of this md&a contain a number of forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties .
words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cseeks , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201ccontinues , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cshould , 201d and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements .
in addition , any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance , our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses , uncertain events or assumptions , and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements .
such statements are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this filing and particularly in 201crisk factors 201d in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k .
our actual results may differ materially , and these forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any divestitures , mergers , acquisitions , or other business combinations that had not been completed as of february 14 , 2014 .
overview our results of operations for each period were as follows: .

Table:
( dollars in millions except per share amounts )	three months ended dec . 282013	three months ended sept . 282013	three months ended change	three months ended dec . 282013	three months ended dec . 292012	change
net revenue	$ 13834	$ 13483	$ 351	$ 52708	$ 53341	$ -633 ( 633 )
gross margin	$ 8571	$ 8414	$ 157	$ 31521	$ 33151	$ -1630 ( 1630 )
gross margin percentage	62.0% ( 62.0 % )	62.4% ( 62.4 % )	( 0.4 ) % (  % )	59.8% ( 59.8 % )	62.1% ( 62.1 % )	( 2.3 ) % (  % )
operating income	$ 3549	$ 3504	$ 45	$ 12291	$ 14638	$ -2347 ( 2347 )
net income	$ 2625	$ 2950	$ -325 ( 325 )	$ 9620	$ 11005	$ -1385 ( 1385 )
diluted earnings per common share	$ 0.51	$ 0.58	$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )	$ 1.89	$ 2.13	$ -0.24 ( 0.24 )

Post-table text:
revenue for 2013 was down 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 .
pccg experienced lower platform unit sales in the first half of the year , but saw offsetting growth in the back half as the pc market began to show signs of stabilization .
dcg continued to benefit from the build out of internet cloud computing and the strength of our product portfolio resulting in increased platform volumes for dcg for the year .
higher factory start-up costs for our next-generation 14nm process technology led to a decrease in gross margin compared to 2012 .
in response to the current business environment and to better align resources , management approved several restructuring actions including targeted workforce reductions as well as the exit of certain businesses and facilities .
these actions resulted in restructuring and asset impairment charges of $ 240 million for 2013 .
table of contents .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2012 net revenue, in percentage?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the net revenue from 2012 to 2013?
[Turn 2] and what was that net revenue in 2012?
[Turn 3] how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2012 net revenue, in percentage?

Pre-table text:
item 7 .
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations our management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) is provided in addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations , financial condition , and cash flows .
md&a is organized as follows : 2022 overview .
discussion of our business and overall analysis of financial and other highlights affecting the company in order to provide context for the remainder of md&a .
2022 critical accounting estimates .
accounting estimates that we believe are most important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results and forecasts .
2022 results of operations .
an analysis of our financial results comparing 2013 to 2012 and comparing 2012 to 2022 liquidity and capital resources .
an analysis of changes in our balance sheets and cash flows , and discussion of our financial condition and potential sources of liquidity .
2022 fair value of financial instruments .
discussion of the methodologies used in the valuation of our financial instruments .
2022 contractual obligations and off-balance-sheet arrangements .
overview of contractual obligations , contingent liabilities , commitments , and off-balance-sheet arrangements outstanding as of december 28 , 2013 , including expected payment schedule .
the various sections of this md&a contain a number of forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties .
words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cseeks , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201ccontinues , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cshould , 201d and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements .
in addition , any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance , our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses , uncertain events or assumptions , and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements .
such statements are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this filing and particularly in 201crisk factors 201d in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k .
our actual results may differ materially , and these forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any divestitures , mergers , acquisitions , or other business combinations that had not been completed as of february 14 , 2014 .
overview our results of operations for each period were as follows: .

Table:
( dollars in millions except per share amounts )	three months ended dec . 282013	three months ended sept . 282013	three months ended change	three months ended dec . 282013	three months ended dec . 292012	change
net revenue	$ 13834	$ 13483	$ 351	$ 52708	$ 53341	$ -633 ( 633 )
gross margin	$ 8571	$ 8414	$ 157	$ 31521	$ 33151	$ -1630 ( 1630 )
gross margin percentage	62.0% ( 62.0 % )	62.4% ( 62.4 % )	( 0.4 ) % (  % )	59.8% ( 59.8 % )	62.1% ( 62.1 % )	( 2.3 ) % (  % )
operating income	$ 3549	$ 3504	$ 45	$ 12291	$ 14638	$ -2347 ( 2347 )
net income	$ 2625	$ 2950	$ -325 ( 325 )	$ 9620	$ 11005	$ -1385 ( 1385 )
diluted earnings per common share	$ 0.51	$ 0.58	$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )	$ 1.89	$ 2.13	$ -0.24 ( 0.24 )

Post-table text:
revenue for 2013 was down 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 .
pccg experienced lower platform unit sales in the first half of the year , but saw offsetting growth in the back half as the pc market began to show signs of stabilization .
dcg continued to benefit from the build out of internet cloud computing and the strength of our product portfolio resulting in increased platform volumes for dcg for the year .
higher factory start-up costs for our next-generation 14nm process technology led to a decrease in gross margin compared to 2012 .
in response to the current business environment and to better align resources , management approved several restructuring actions including targeted workforce reductions as well as the exit of certain businesses and facilities .
these actions resulted in restructuring and asset impairment charges of $ 240 million for 2013 .
table of contents .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
between the years of 2008 and 2009, what was the variation in the capital gain distributions?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] between the years of 2008 and 2009, what was the variation in the capital gain distributions?

Pre-table text:
investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 44 million , or 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , to $ 477.8 million in 2009 .
average assets in these portfolios were $ 129.5 billion during 2009 , down $ 12.6 billion or 9% ( 9 % ) from 2008 .
other investment portfolio assets under management increased $ 46.7 billion during 2009 , including $ 36.5 billion in market gains and income and $ 10.2 billion of net inflows , primarily from institutional investors .
net inflows include $ 1.3 billion transferred from the stock and blended asset mutual funds during 2009 .
administrative fees decreased $ 35 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 319 million in 2009 .
this change includes a $ 4 million decrease in 12b-1 distribution and service fees recognized on lower average assets under management in the advisor and r classes of our sponsored mutual funds and a $ 31 million reduction in our mutual fund servicing revenue , which is primarily attributable to our cost reduction efforts in the mutual fund and retirement plan servicing functions .
changes in administrative fees are generally offset by similar changes in related operating expenses that are incurred to provide services to the funds and their investors .
our largest expense , compensation and related costs , decreased $ 42 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , from 2008 to $ 773 million in 2009 .
the largest part of this decrease is attributable to a $ 19 million reduction in our annual bonus program .
reductions in the use of outside contractors lowered 2009 costs $ 14 million with the remainder of the cost savings primarily attributable to the workforce reduction and lower employee benefits and other employment expenses .
average headcount in 2009 was down 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) from 2008 due to attrition , retirements and our workforce reduction in april 2009 .
advertising and promotion expenditures were down $ 31 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) , versus 2008 due to our decision to reduce spending in response to lower investor activity in the 2009 market environment .
depreciation expense and other occupancy and facility costs together increased $ 4 million , or 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) compared to 2008 , as we moderated or delayed our capital spending and facility growth plans .
other operating expenses decreased $ 33 million , or 18% ( 18 % ) from 2008 , including a decline of $ 4 million in distribution and service expenses recognized on lower average assets under management in our advisor and r classes of mutual fund shares that are sourced from financial intermediaries .
our cost control efforts resulted in the remaining expense reductions , including lower professional fees and travel and related costs .
our non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 .
the improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 .
the following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the two years ended december 31 , 2009. .

Table:
	2008	2009	change
other than temporary impairments recognized	$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )	$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )	$ 55.2
capital gain distributions received	5.6	2.0	-3.6 ( 3.6 )
net gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions	-4.5 ( 4.5 )	7.4	11.9
net loss recognized on fund holdings	$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )	$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )	$ 63.5

Post-table text:
lower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments .
the 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 .
our 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) .
c a p i t a l r e s o u r c e s a n d l i q u i d i t y .
during 2010 , stockholders 2019 equity increased from $ 2.9 billion to $ 3.3 billion .
we repurchased nearly 5.0 million common shares for $ 240.0 million in 2010 .
tangible book value is $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2010 , and our cash and cash equivalents and our mutual fund investment holdings total more than $ 1.5 billion .
given the availability of these financial resources , we do not maintain an available external source of liquidity .
t .
rowe price group annual report 2010 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what is this variation as a percent of those distributions in 2008?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] between the years of 2008 and 2009, what was the variation in the capital gain distributions?
[Turn 2] and what is this variation as a percent of those distributions in 2008?

Pre-table text:
investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 44 million , or 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , to $ 477.8 million in 2009 .
average assets in these portfolios were $ 129.5 billion during 2009 , down $ 12.6 billion or 9% ( 9 % ) from 2008 .
other investment portfolio assets under management increased $ 46.7 billion during 2009 , including $ 36.5 billion in market gains and income and $ 10.2 billion of net inflows , primarily from institutional investors .
net inflows include $ 1.3 billion transferred from the stock and blended asset mutual funds during 2009 .
administrative fees decreased $ 35 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 319 million in 2009 .
this change includes a $ 4 million decrease in 12b-1 distribution and service fees recognized on lower average assets under management in the advisor and r classes of our sponsored mutual funds and a $ 31 million reduction in our mutual fund servicing revenue , which is primarily attributable to our cost reduction efforts in the mutual fund and retirement plan servicing functions .
changes in administrative fees are generally offset by similar changes in related operating expenses that are incurred to provide services to the funds and their investors .
our largest expense , compensation and related costs , decreased $ 42 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , from 2008 to $ 773 million in 2009 .
the largest part of this decrease is attributable to a $ 19 million reduction in our annual bonus program .
reductions in the use of outside contractors lowered 2009 costs $ 14 million with the remainder of the cost savings primarily attributable to the workforce reduction and lower employee benefits and other employment expenses .
average headcount in 2009 was down 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) from 2008 due to attrition , retirements and our workforce reduction in april 2009 .
advertising and promotion expenditures were down $ 31 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) , versus 2008 due to our decision to reduce spending in response to lower investor activity in the 2009 market environment .
depreciation expense and other occupancy and facility costs together increased $ 4 million , or 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) compared to 2008 , as we moderated or delayed our capital spending and facility growth plans .
other operating expenses decreased $ 33 million , or 18% ( 18 % ) from 2008 , including a decline of $ 4 million in distribution and service expenses recognized on lower average assets under management in our advisor and r classes of mutual fund shares that are sourced from financial intermediaries .
our cost control efforts resulted in the remaining expense reductions , including lower professional fees and travel and related costs .
our non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 .
the improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 .
the following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the two years ended december 31 , 2009. .

Table:
	2008	2009	change
other than temporary impairments recognized	$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )	$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )	$ 55.2
capital gain distributions received	5.6	2.0	-3.6 ( 3.6 )
net gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions	-4.5 ( 4.5 )	7.4	11.9
net loss recognized on fund holdings	$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )	$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )	$ 63.5

Post-table text:
lower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments .
the 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 .
our 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) .
c a p i t a l r e s o u r c e s a n d l i q u i d i t y .
during 2010 , stockholders 2019 equity increased from $ 2.9 billion to $ 3.3 billion .
we repurchased nearly 5.0 million common shares for $ 240.0 million in 2010 .
tangible book value is $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2010 , and our cash and cash equivalents and our mutual fund investment holdings total more than $ 1.5 billion .
given the availability of these financial resources , we do not maintain an available external source of liquidity .
t .
rowe price group annual report 2010 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and in the subsequent year of this period, in 2010, what was the average price for which the shares were repurchased?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] between the years of 2008 and 2009, what was the variation in the capital gain distributions?
[Turn 2] and what is this variation as a percent of those distributions in 2008?
[Turn 3] and in the subsequent year of this period, in 2010, what was the average price for which the shares were repurchased?

Pre-table text:
investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 44 million , or 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , to $ 477.8 million in 2009 .
average assets in these portfolios were $ 129.5 billion during 2009 , down $ 12.6 billion or 9% ( 9 % ) from 2008 .
other investment portfolio assets under management increased $ 46.7 billion during 2009 , including $ 36.5 billion in market gains and income and $ 10.2 billion of net inflows , primarily from institutional investors .
net inflows include $ 1.3 billion transferred from the stock and blended asset mutual funds during 2009 .
administrative fees decreased $ 35 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 319 million in 2009 .
this change includes a $ 4 million decrease in 12b-1 distribution and service fees recognized on lower average assets under management in the advisor and r classes of our sponsored mutual funds and a $ 31 million reduction in our mutual fund servicing revenue , which is primarily attributable to our cost reduction efforts in the mutual fund and retirement plan servicing functions .
changes in administrative fees are generally offset by similar changes in related operating expenses that are incurred to provide services to the funds and their investors .
our largest expense , compensation and related costs , decreased $ 42 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , from 2008 to $ 773 million in 2009 .
the largest part of this decrease is attributable to a $ 19 million reduction in our annual bonus program .
reductions in the use of outside contractors lowered 2009 costs $ 14 million with the remainder of the cost savings primarily attributable to the workforce reduction and lower employee benefits and other employment expenses .
average headcount in 2009 was down 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) from 2008 due to attrition , retirements and our workforce reduction in april 2009 .
advertising and promotion expenditures were down $ 31 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) , versus 2008 due to our decision to reduce spending in response to lower investor activity in the 2009 market environment .
depreciation expense and other occupancy and facility costs together increased $ 4 million , or 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) compared to 2008 , as we moderated or delayed our capital spending and facility growth plans .
other operating expenses decreased $ 33 million , or 18% ( 18 % ) from 2008 , including a decline of $ 4 million in distribution and service expenses recognized on lower average assets under management in our advisor and r classes of mutual fund shares that are sourced from financial intermediaries .
our cost control efforts resulted in the remaining expense reductions , including lower professional fees and travel and related costs .
our non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 .
the improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 .
the following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the two years ended december 31 , 2009. .

Table:
	2008	2009	change
other than temporary impairments recognized	$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )	$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )	$ 55.2
capital gain distributions received	5.6	2.0	-3.6 ( 3.6 )
net gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions	-4.5 ( 4.5 )	7.4	11.9
net loss recognized on fund holdings	$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )	$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )	$ 63.5

Post-table text:
lower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments .
the 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 .
our 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) .
c a p i t a l r e s o u r c e s a n d l i q u i d i t y .
during 2010 , stockholders 2019 equity increased from $ 2.9 billion to $ 3.3 billion .
we repurchased nearly 5.0 million common shares for $ 240.0 million in 2010 .
tangible book value is $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2010 , and our cash and cash equivalents and our mutual fund investment holdings total more than $ 1.5 billion .
given the availability of these financial resources , we do not maintain an available external source of liquidity .
t .
rowe price group annual report 2010 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the maximum potential change that can be made by cme on their current line of credit?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the maximum potential change that can be made by cme on their current line of credit?

Pre-table text:
2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts .
in the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation .
these assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights .
in addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm .
thereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package .
we would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit .
we maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing .
we have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion .
we may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms .
the credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit .
pledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s .
treasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs .
performance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line .
in addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default .
aggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit .
a defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm .
the following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) .
.
.
.
.
2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit .
( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms .
( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund .
( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .

Table:
( in millions )	cme clearingavailable assets
designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 )	$ 100.0
guaranty fund contributions ( 2 )	2899.5
assessment powers ( 3 )	7973.6
minimum total assets available for default ( 4 )	$ 10973.1

Post-table text:
2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts .
in the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation .
these assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights .
in addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm .
thereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package .
we would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit .
we maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing .
we have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion .
we may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms .
the credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit .
pledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s .
treasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs .
performance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line .
in addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default .
aggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit .
a defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm .
the following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) .
.
.
.
.
2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit .
( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms .
( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund .
( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and how much, in percentage, does this maximum potential change represent in relation to that current line of credit as it is now?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the maximum potential change that can be made by cme on their current line of credit?
[Turn 2] and how much, in percentage, does this maximum potential change represent in relation to that current line of credit as it is now?

Pre-table text:
2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts .
in the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation .
these assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights .
in addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm .
thereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package .
we would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit .
we maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing .
we have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion .
we may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms .
the credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit .
pledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s .
treasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs .
performance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line .
in addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default .
aggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit .
a defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm .
the following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) .
.
.
.
.
2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit .
( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms .
( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund .
( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .

Table:
( in millions )	cme clearingavailable assets
designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 )	$ 100.0
guaranty fund contributions ( 2 )	2899.5
assessment powers ( 3 )	7973.6
minimum total assets available for default ( 4 )	$ 10973.1

Post-table text:
2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts .
in the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation .
these assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights .
in addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm .
thereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package .
we would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit .
we maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing .
we have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion .
we may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms .
the credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit .
pledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s .
treasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs .
performance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line .
in addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default .
aggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit .
a defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm .
the following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) .
.
.
.
.
2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit .
( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms .
( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund .
( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the free cash flow in 2015?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the free cash flow in 2015?

Pre-table text:
to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities .
the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : .

Table:
millions	2015	2014	2013
cash provided by operating activities	$ 7344	$ 7385	$ 6823
cash used in investing activities	-4476 ( 4476 )	-4249 ( 4249 )	-3405 ( 3405 )
dividends paid	-2344 ( 2344 )	-1632 ( 1632 )	-1333 ( 1333 )
free cash flow	$ 524	$ 1504	$ 2085

Post-table text:
2016 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve .
we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments .
we will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety .
we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network .
f0b7 network operations 2013 in 2016 , we will continue to align resources with customer demand , continue to improve network performance , and maintain our surge capability .
f0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices during 2015 , fuel price projections continue to be uncertain in the current environment .
we again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s .
domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors .
as prices fluctuate , there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months .
continuing lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport .
alternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments .
f0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2016 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 3.75 billion , including expenditures for ptc , 230 locomotives and 450 freight cars .
the capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments .
( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 economic conditions in many of our market sectors continue to drive uncertainty with respect to our volume levels .
we expect volumes to be down slightly in 2016 compared to 2015 , but will depend on the overall economy and market conditions .
the strong u.s .
dollar and historic low commodity prices could also drive continued volatility .
one of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities .
in the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives , and the ability to leverage our resources and strengthen our franchise .
over the longer term , we expect the overall u.s .
economy to continue to improve at a modest pace , with some markets outperforming others. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was the cash provided by operating activities in that same year?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the free cash flow in 2015?
[Turn 2] and what was the cash provided by operating activities in that same year?

Pre-table text:
to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities .
the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : .

Table:
millions	2015	2014	2013
cash provided by operating activities	$ 7344	$ 7385	$ 6823
cash used in investing activities	-4476 ( 4476 )	-4249 ( 4249 )	-3405 ( 3405 )
dividends paid	-2344 ( 2344 )	-1632 ( 1632 )	-1333 ( 1333 )
free cash flow	$ 524	$ 1504	$ 2085

Post-table text:
2016 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve .
we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments .
we will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety .
we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network .
f0b7 network operations 2013 in 2016 , we will continue to align resources with customer demand , continue to improve network performance , and maintain our surge capability .
f0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices during 2015 , fuel price projections continue to be uncertain in the current environment .
we again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s .
domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors .
as prices fluctuate , there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months .
continuing lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport .
alternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments .
f0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2016 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 3.75 billion , including expenditures for ptc , 230 locomotives and 450 freight cars .
the capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments .
( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 economic conditions in many of our market sectors continue to drive uncertainty with respect to our volume levels .
we expect volumes to be down slightly in 2016 compared to 2015 , but will depend on the overall economy and market conditions .
the strong u.s .
dollar and historic low commodity prices could also drive continued volatility .
one of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities .
in the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives , and the ability to leverage our resources and strengthen our franchise .
over the longer term , we expect the overall u.s .
economy to continue to improve at a modest pace , with some markets outperforming others. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
how much, then, did the first represent in relation to the second?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the free cash flow in 2015?
[Turn 2] and what was the cash provided by operating activities in that same year?
[Turn 3] how much, then, did the first represent in relation to the second?

Pre-table text:
to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities .
the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : .

Table:
millions	2015	2014	2013
cash provided by operating activities	$ 7344	$ 7385	$ 6823
cash used in investing activities	-4476 ( 4476 )	-4249 ( 4249 )	-3405 ( 3405 )
dividends paid	-2344 ( 2344 )	-1632 ( 1632 )	-1333 ( 1333 )
free cash flow	$ 524	$ 1504	$ 2085

Post-table text:
2016 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve .
we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments .
we will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety .
we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network .
f0b7 network operations 2013 in 2016 , we will continue to align resources with customer demand , continue to improve network performance , and maintain our surge capability .
f0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices during 2015 , fuel price projections continue to be uncertain in the current environment .
we again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s .
domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors .
as prices fluctuate , there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months .
continuing lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport .
alternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments .
f0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2016 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 3.75 billion , including expenditures for ptc , 230 locomotives and 450 freight cars .
the capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments .
( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 economic conditions in many of our market sectors continue to drive uncertainty with respect to our volume levels .
we expect volumes to be down slightly in 2016 compared to 2015 , but will depend on the overall economy and market conditions .
the strong u.s .
dollar and historic low commodity prices could also drive continued volatility .
one of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities .
in the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives , and the ability to leverage our resources and strengthen our franchise .
over the longer term , we expect the overall u.s .
economy to continue to improve at a modest pace , with some markets outperforming others. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.