[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the total liability by the end of 2008?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total liability by the end of 2008?
[Turn 2] and what was it by the end of 2007?
[Turn 3] what was, then, the change over the year?
[Turn 4] what was the total liability by the end of 2008?

Pre-table text:
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total .

Table:
	2007 program	2003 program	2001 program	total
liability at december 31 2006	$ 2014	$ 12.6	$ 19.2	$ 31.8
net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments	19.1	-0.5 ( 0.5 )	-5.2 ( 5.2 )	13.4
payments and other1	-7.2 ( 7.2 )	-3.1 ( 3.1 )	-5.3 ( 5.3 )	-15.6 ( 15.6 )
liability at december 31 2007	$ 11.9	$ 9.0	$ 8.7	$ 29.6
net charges and adjustments	4.3	0.8	0.7	5.8
payments and other1	-15.0 ( 15.0 )	-4.1 ( 4.1 )	-3.5 ( 3.5 )	-22.6 ( 22.6 )
liability at december 31 2008	$ 1.2	$ 5.7	$ 5.9	$ 12.8

Post-table text:
1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates .
other reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb .
charges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs .
we expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 .
charges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete .
the charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2008 total liability?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total liability by the end of 2008?
[Turn 2] and what was it by the end of 2007?
[Turn 3] what was, then, the change over the year?
[Turn 4] what was the total liability by the end of 2008?
[Turn 5] and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2008 total liability?

Pre-table text:
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total .

Table:
	2007 program	2003 program	2001 program	total
liability at december 31 2006	$ 2014	$ 12.6	$ 19.2	$ 31.8
net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments	19.1	-0.5 ( 0.5 )	-5.2 ( 5.2 )	13.4
payments and other1	-7.2 ( 7.2 )	-3.1 ( 3.1 )	-5.3 ( 5.3 )	-15.6 ( 15.6 )
liability at december 31 2007	$ 11.9	$ 9.0	$ 8.7	$ 29.6
net charges and adjustments	4.3	0.8	0.7	5.8
payments and other1	-15.0 ( 15.0 )	-4.1 ( 4.1 )	-3.5 ( 3.5 )	-22.6 ( 22.6 )
liability at december 31 2008	$ 1.2	$ 5.7	$ 5.9	$ 12.8

Post-table text:
1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates .
other reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb .
charges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs .
we expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 .
charges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete .
the charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
how much is that in percentage?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total liability by the end of 2008?
[Turn 2] and what was it by the end of 2007?
[Turn 3] what was, then, the change over the year?
[Turn 4] what was the total liability by the end of 2008?
[Turn 5] and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2008 total liability?
[Turn 6] how much is that in percentage?

Pre-table text:
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total .

Table:
	2007 program	2003 program	2001 program	total
liability at december 31 2006	$ 2014	$ 12.6	$ 19.2	$ 31.8
net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments	19.1	-0.5 ( 0.5 )	-5.2 ( 5.2 )	13.4
payments and other1	-7.2 ( 7.2 )	-3.1 ( 3.1 )	-5.3 ( 5.3 )	-15.6 ( 15.6 )
liability at december 31 2007	$ 11.9	$ 9.0	$ 8.7	$ 29.6
net charges and adjustments	4.3	0.8	0.7	5.8
payments and other1	-15.0 ( 15.0 )	-4.1 ( 4.1 )	-3.5 ( 3.5 )	-22.6 ( 22.6 )
liability at december 31 2008	$ 1.2	$ 5.7	$ 5.9	$ 12.8

Post-table text:
1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates .
other reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb .
charges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs .
we expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 .
charges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete .
the charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the change in price for ball corporation between 12/31/10 and 12/31/05?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in price for ball corporation between 12/31/10 and 12/31/05?

Pre-table text:
page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 .
it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested .
the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization .
total return analysis .

Table:
	12/31/05	12/31/06	12/31/07	12/31/08	12/31/09	12/31/10
ball corporation	$ 100.00	$ 110.86	$ 115.36	$ 107.58	$ 134.96	$ 178.93
dj containers & packaging index	$ 100.00	$ 112.09	$ 119.63	$ 75.00	$ 105.34	$ 123.56
s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 115.80	$ 122.16	$ 76.96	$ 97.33	$ 111.99
copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )
copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
so what was the percentage cumulative return during this time?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in price for ball corporation between 12/31/10 and 12/31/05?
[Turn 2] so what was the percentage cumulative return during this time?

Pre-table text:
page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 .
it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested .
the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization .
total return analysis .

Table:
	12/31/05	12/31/06	12/31/07	12/31/08	12/31/09	12/31/10
ball corporation	$ 100.00	$ 110.86	$ 115.36	$ 107.58	$ 134.96	$ 178.93
dj containers & packaging index	$ 100.00	$ 112.09	$ 119.63	$ 75.00	$ 105.34	$ 123.56
s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 115.80	$ 122.16	$ 76.96	$ 97.33	$ 111.99
copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )
copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
did the five year total return for ball corporation outperform the dj containers & packaging index?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in price for ball corporation between 12/31/10 and 12/31/05?
[Turn 2] so what was the percentage cumulative return during this time?
[Turn 3] did the five year total return for ball corporation outperform the dj containers & packaging index?

Pre-table text:
page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 .
it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested .
the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization .
total return analysis .

Table:
	12/31/05	12/31/06	12/31/07	12/31/08	12/31/09	12/31/10
ball corporation	$ 100.00	$ 110.86	$ 115.36	$ 107.58	$ 134.96	$ 178.93
dj containers & packaging index	$ 100.00	$ 112.09	$ 119.63	$ 75.00	$ 105.34	$ 123.56
s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 115.80	$ 122.16	$ 76.96	$ 97.33	$ 111.99
copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )
copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the net change in non-utility nuclear earnings from 2001 to 2002?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net change in non-utility nuclear earnings from 2001 to 2002?

Pre-table text:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances .
the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 .
the refund was made in december 2001 .
2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s .
utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas .
non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively .
the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 .
following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: .

Table:
	2002	2001	2000
net mw in operation at december 31	3955	3445	2475
generation in gwh for the year	29953	22614	7171
capacity factor for the year	93% ( 93 % )	93% ( 93 % )	94% ( 94 % )

Post-table text:
2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the value in 2001?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net change in non-utility nuclear earnings from 2001 to 2002?
[Turn 2] what was the value in 2001?

Pre-table text:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances .
the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 .
the refund was made in december 2001 .
2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s .
utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas .
non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively .
the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 .
following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: .

Table:
	2002	2001	2000
net mw in operation at december 31	3955	3445	2475
generation in gwh for the year	29953	22614	7171
capacity factor for the year	93% ( 93 % )	93% ( 93 % )	94% ( 94 % )

Post-table text:
2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the change over the 2001 value?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net change in non-utility nuclear earnings from 2001 to 2002?
[Turn 2] what was the value in 2001?
[Turn 3] what is the change over the 2001 value?

Pre-table text:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances .
the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 .
the refund was made in december 2001 .
2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s .
utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas .
non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively .
the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 .
following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: .

Table:
	2002	2001	2000
net mw in operation at december 31	3955	3445	2475
generation in gwh for the year	29953	22614	7171
capacity factor for the year	93% ( 93 % )	93% ( 93 % )	94% ( 94 % )

Post-table text:
2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the value of s&p financials in 2016?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of s&p financials in 2016?

Pre-table text:
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 .
the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .
comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

Table:
date	citi	s&p 500	s&p financials
31-dec-2012	100.0	100.0	100.0
31-dec-2013	131.8	132.4	135.6
31-dec-2014	137.0	150.5	156.2
31-dec-2015	131.4	152.6	153.9
31-dec-2016	152.3	170.8	188.9
31-dec-2017	193.5	208.1	230.9

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the value in 2015?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of s&p financials in 2016?
[Turn 2] what is the value in 2015?

Pre-table text:
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 .
the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .
comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

Table:
date	citi	s&p 500	s&p financials
31-dec-2012	100.0	100.0	100.0
31-dec-2013	131.8	132.4	135.6
31-dec-2014	137.0	150.5	156.2
31-dec-2015	131.4	152.6	153.9
31-dec-2016	152.3	170.8	188.9
31-dec-2017	193.5	208.1	230.9

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the net change?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of s&p financials in 2016?
[Turn 2] what is the value in 2015?
[Turn 3] what is the net change?

Pre-table text:
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 .
the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .
comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

Table:
date	citi	s&p 500	s&p financials
31-dec-2012	100.0	100.0	100.0
31-dec-2013	131.8	132.4	135.6
31-dec-2014	137.0	150.5	156.2
31-dec-2015	131.4	152.6	153.9
31-dec-2016	152.3	170.8	188.9
31-dec-2017	193.5	208.1	230.9

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the 2015 number?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of s&p financials in 2016?
[Turn 2] what is the value in 2015?
[Turn 3] what is the net change?
[Turn 4] what was the 2015 number?

Pre-table text:
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 .
the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .
comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

Table:
date	citi	s&p 500	s&p financials
31-dec-2012	100.0	100.0	100.0
31-dec-2013	131.8	132.4	135.6
31-dec-2014	137.0	150.5	156.2
31-dec-2015	131.4	152.6	153.9
31-dec-2016	152.3	170.8	188.9
31-dec-2017	193.5	208.1	230.9

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the net change over the 2015 value?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of s&p financials in 2016?
[Turn 2] what is the value in 2015?
[Turn 3] what is the net change?
[Turn 4] what was the 2015 number?
[Turn 5] what is the net change over the 2015 value?

Pre-table text:
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 .
the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .
comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

Table:
date	citi	s&p 500	s&p financials
31-dec-2012	100.0	100.0	100.0
31-dec-2013	131.8	132.4	135.6
31-dec-2014	137.0	150.5	156.2
31-dec-2015	131.4	152.6	153.9
31-dec-2016	152.3	170.8	188.9
31-dec-2017	193.5	208.1	230.9

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what portion of the company owned facilities are in europe?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what portion of the company owned facilities are in europe?

Pre-table text:
item 1b .
unresolved staff comments .
item 2 .
properties .
our corporate co-headquarters are located in pittsburgh , pennsylvania and chicago , illinois .
our co-headquarters are leased and house our executive offices , certain u.s .
business units , and our administrative , finance , and human resource functions .
we maintain additional owned and leased offices throughout the regions in which we operate .
we manufacture our products in our network of manufacturing and processing facilities located throughout the world .
as of december 31 , 2016 , we operated 87 manufacturing and processing facilities .
we own 83 and lease four of these facilities .
our manufacturing and processing facilities count by segment as of december 31 , 2016 was: .

Table:
	owned	leased
united states	43	2
canada	3	2014
europe	11	2014
rest of world	26	2

Post-table text:
we maintain all of our manufacturing and processing facilities in good condition and believe they are suitable and are adequate for our present needs .
we also enter into co-manufacturing arrangements with third parties if we determine it is advantageous to outsource the production of any of our products .
in the fourth quarter of 2016 , we reorganized our segment structure to move our russia business from the rest of world segment to the europe segment .
we have reflected this change in the table above .
see note 18 , segment reporting , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .
several of our current manufacturing and processing facilities are scheduled to be closed within the next year .
see note 3 , integration and restructuring expenses , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .
item 3 .
legal proceedings .
we are routinely involved in legal proceedings , claims , and governmental inquiries , inspections or investigations ( 201clegal matters 201d ) arising in the ordinary course of our business .
on april 1 , 2015 , the commodity futures trading commission ( 201ccftc 201d ) filed a formal complaint against mondel 0113z international ( formerly known as kraft foods inc. ) and kraft in the u.s .
district court for the northern district of illinois , eastern division , related to activities involving the trading of december 2011 wheat futures contracts .
the complaint alleges that mondel 0113z international and kraft ( 1 ) manipulated or attempted to manipulate the wheat markets during the fall of 2011 , ( 2 ) violated position limit levels for wheat futures , and ( 3 ) engaged in non-competitive trades by trading both sides of exchange-for-physical chicago board of trade wheat contracts .
as previously disclosed by kraft , these activities arose prior to the october 1 , 2012 spin-off of kraft by mondel 0113z international to its shareholders and involve the business now owned and operated by mondel 0113z international or its affiliates .
the separation and distribution agreement between kraft and mondel 0113z international , dated as of september 27 , 2012 , governs the allocation of liabilities between mondel 0113z international and kraft and , accordingly , mondel 0113z international will predominantly bear the costs of this matter and any monetary penalties or other payments that the cftc may impose .
we do not expect this matter to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations , or business .
while we cannot predict with certainty the results of legal matters in which we are currently involved or may in the future be involved , we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve any of the legal matters that are currently pending will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations .
item 4 .
mine safety disclosures .
not applicable. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
at 12/31/16 what percentage of manufacturing and processing facilities are leased?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what portion of the company owned facilities are in europe?
[Turn 2] at 12/31/16 what percentage of manufacturing and processing facilities are leased?

Pre-table text:
item 1b .
unresolved staff comments .
item 2 .
properties .
our corporate co-headquarters are located in pittsburgh , pennsylvania and chicago , illinois .
our co-headquarters are leased and house our executive offices , certain u.s .
business units , and our administrative , finance , and human resource functions .
we maintain additional owned and leased offices throughout the regions in which we operate .
we manufacture our products in our network of manufacturing and processing facilities located throughout the world .
as of december 31 , 2016 , we operated 87 manufacturing and processing facilities .
we own 83 and lease four of these facilities .
our manufacturing and processing facilities count by segment as of december 31 , 2016 was: .

Table:
	owned	leased
united states	43	2
canada	3	2014
europe	11	2014
rest of world	26	2

Post-table text:
we maintain all of our manufacturing and processing facilities in good condition and believe they are suitable and are adequate for our present needs .
we also enter into co-manufacturing arrangements with third parties if we determine it is advantageous to outsource the production of any of our products .
in the fourth quarter of 2016 , we reorganized our segment structure to move our russia business from the rest of world segment to the europe segment .
we have reflected this change in the table above .
see note 18 , segment reporting , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .
several of our current manufacturing and processing facilities are scheduled to be closed within the next year .
see note 3 , integration and restructuring expenses , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .
item 3 .
legal proceedings .
we are routinely involved in legal proceedings , claims , and governmental inquiries , inspections or investigations ( 201clegal matters 201d ) arising in the ordinary course of our business .
on april 1 , 2015 , the commodity futures trading commission ( 201ccftc 201d ) filed a formal complaint against mondel 0113z international ( formerly known as kraft foods inc. ) and kraft in the u.s .
district court for the northern district of illinois , eastern division , related to activities involving the trading of december 2011 wheat futures contracts .
the complaint alleges that mondel 0113z international and kraft ( 1 ) manipulated or attempted to manipulate the wheat markets during the fall of 2011 , ( 2 ) violated position limit levels for wheat futures , and ( 3 ) engaged in non-competitive trades by trading both sides of exchange-for-physical chicago board of trade wheat contracts .
as previously disclosed by kraft , these activities arose prior to the october 1 , 2012 spin-off of kraft by mondel 0113z international to its shareholders and involve the business now owned and operated by mondel 0113z international or its affiliates .
the separation and distribution agreement between kraft and mondel 0113z international , dated as of september 27 , 2012 , governs the allocation of liabilities between mondel 0113z international and kraft and , accordingly , mondel 0113z international will predominantly bear the costs of this matter and any monetary penalties or other payments that the cftc may impose .
we do not expect this matter to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations , or business .
while we cannot predict with certainty the results of legal matters in which we are currently involved or may in the future be involved , we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve any of the legal matters that are currently pending will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations .
item 4 .
mine safety disclosures .
not applicable. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the total of unrealized losses related to reclassifications in 2011, before tax?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of unrealized losses related to reclassifications in 2011, before tax?

Pre-table text:
impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: .

Table:
( in millions )	2011	2010
fair value	$ 99832	$ 81881
amortized cost	100013	82329
net unrealized loss pre-tax	$ -181 ( 181 )	$ -448 ( 448 )
net unrealized loss after-tax	$ -113 ( 113 )	$ -270 ( 270 )

Post-table text:
the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .
these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci .
refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 .
the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization .
we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .
to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .
the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security .
our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors .
such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .
to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .
given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s .
housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance .
as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices .
generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears .
as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current .
overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough .
the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate .
in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above .
the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations .
our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses .
ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security .
in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s .
residential mortgage-backed portfolio .
we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above .
this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults .
to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated .
excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was it after tax?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of unrealized losses related to reclassifications in 2011, before tax?
[Turn 2] and what was it after tax?

Pre-table text:
impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: .

Table:
( in millions )	2011	2010
fair value	$ 99832	$ 81881
amortized cost	100013	82329
net unrealized loss pre-tax	$ -181 ( 181 )	$ -448 ( 448 )
net unrealized loss after-tax	$ -113 ( 113 )	$ -270 ( 270 )

Post-table text:
the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .
these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci .
refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 .
the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization .
we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .
to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .
the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security .
our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors .
such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .
to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .
given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s .
housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance .
as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices .
generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears .
as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current .
overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough .
the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate .
in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above .
the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations .
our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses .
ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security .
in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s .
residential mortgage-backed portfolio .
we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above .
this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults .
to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated .
excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was, then, the impact of the tax on that total?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of unrealized losses related to reclassifications in 2011, before tax?
[Turn 2] and what was it after tax?
[Turn 3] what was, then, the impact of the tax on that total?

Pre-table text:
impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: .

Table:
( in millions )	2011	2010
fair value	$ 99832	$ 81881
amortized cost	100013	82329
net unrealized loss pre-tax	$ -181 ( 181 )	$ -448 ( 448 )
net unrealized loss after-tax	$ -113 ( 113 )	$ -270 ( 270 )

Post-table text:
the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .
these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci .
refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 .
the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization .
we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .
to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .
the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security .
our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors .
such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .
to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .
given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s .
housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance .
as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices .
generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears .
as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current .
overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough .
the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate .
in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above .
the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations .
our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses .
ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security .
in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s .
residential mortgage-backed portfolio .
we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above .
this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults .
to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated .
excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and between that year and the previous, 2010, what was the change in the fair value of the full unrealized losses?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of unrealized losses related to reclassifications in 2011, before tax?
[Turn 2] and what was it after tax?
[Turn 3] what was, then, the impact of the tax on that total?
[Turn 4] and between that year and the previous, 2010, what was the change in the fair value of the full unrealized losses?

Pre-table text:
impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: .

Table:
( in millions )	2011	2010
fair value	$ 99832	$ 81881
amortized cost	100013	82329
net unrealized loss pre-tax	$ -181 ( 181 )	$ -448 ( 448 )
net unrealized loss after-tax	$ -113 ( 113 )	$ -270 ( 270 )

Post-table text:
the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .
these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci .
refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 .
the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization .
we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .
to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .
the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security .
our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors .
such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .
to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .
given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s .
housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance .
as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices .
generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears .
as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current .
overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough .
the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate .
in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above .
the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations .
our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses .
ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security .
in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s .
residential mortgage-backed portfolio .
we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above .
this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults .
to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated .
excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is this change as a percentage of that fair value in 2010?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of unrealized losses related to reclassifications in 2011, before tax?
[Turn 2] and what was it after tax?
[Turn 3] what was, then, the impact of the tax on that total?
[Turn 4] and between that year and the previous, 2010, what was the change in the fair value of the full unrealized losses?
[Turn 5] what is this change as a percentage of that fair value in 2010?

Pre-table text:
impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: .

Table:
( in millions )	2011	2010
fair value	$ 99832	$ 81881
amortized cost	100013	82329
net unrealized loss pre-tax	$ -181 ( 181 )	$ -448 ( 448 )
net unrealized loss after-tax	$ -113 ( 113 )	$ -270 ( 270 )

Post-table text:
the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .
these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci .
refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 .
the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization .
we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .
to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .
the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security .
our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors .
such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .
to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .
given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s .
housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance .
as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices .
generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears .
as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current .
overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough .
the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate .
in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above .
the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations .
our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses .
ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security .
in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s .
residential mortgage-backed portfolio .
we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above .
this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults .
to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated .
excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the value of loews common stock in 2011 less 100?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of loews common stock in 2011 less 100?

Pre-table text:
item 5 .
market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

Table:
	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015
loews common stock	100.0	97.37	106.04	126.23	110.59	101.72
s&p 500 index	100.0	102.11	118.45	156.82	178.29	180.75
loews peer group ( a )	100.0	101.59	115.19	145.12	152.84	144.70

Post-table text:
( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r .
berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p .
( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd .
and the travelers companies , inc .
dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 .
regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is that divided by 100?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of loews common stock in 2011 less 100?
[Turn 2] what is that divided by 100?

Pre-table text:
item 5 .
market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

Table:
	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015
loews common stock	100.0	97.37	106.04	126.23	110.59	101.72
s&p 500 index	100.0	102.11	118.45	156.82	178.29	180.75
loews peer group ( a )	100.0	101.59	115.19	145.12	152.84	144.70

Post-table text:
( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r .
berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p .
( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd .
and the travelers companies , inc .
dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 .
regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
in the year of 2005, what was the total amount of the non-tower cash flow?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] in the year of 2005, what was the total amount of the non-tower cash flow?

Pre-table text:
with apb no .
25 .
instead , companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the related expense associated with share-based payments in the statement of operations .
sfas 123r is effective for us as of january 1 , 2006 .
we have historically accounted for share-based payments to employees under apb no .
25 2019s intrinsic value method .
as such , we generally have not recognized compensation expense for options granted to employees .
we will adopt the provisions of sfas 123r under the modified prospective method , in which compensation cost for all share-based payments granted or modified after the effective date is recognized based upon the requirements of sfas 123r , and compensation cost for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date that are unvested as of the effective date of sfas 123r is recognized based on sfas 123 .
tax benefits will be recognized related to the cost for share-based payments to the extent the equity instrument would ordinarily result in a future tax deduction under existing law .
tax expense will be recognized to write off excess deferred tax assets when the tax deduction upon settlement of a vested option is less than the expense recorded in the statement of operations ( to the extent not offset by prior tax credits for settlements where the tax deduction was greater than the fair value cost ) .
we estimate that we will recognize equity-based compensation expense of approximately $ 35 million to $ 38 million for the year ending december 31 , 2006 .
this amount is subject to revisions as we finalize certain assumptions related to 2006 , including the size and nature of awards and forfeiture rates .
sfas 123r also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow rather than as operating cash flow as was previously required .
we cannot estimate what the future tax benefits will be as the amounts depend on , among other factors , future employee stock option exercises .
due to the our tax loss position , there was no operating cash inflow realized for december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for such excess tax deductions .
in march 2005 , the sec issued staff accounting bulletin ( sab ) no .
107 regarding the staff 2019s interpretation of sfas 123r .
this interpretation provides the staff 2019s views regarding interactions between sfas 123r and certain sec rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies .
the interpretive guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of sfas 123r and investors and users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided .
we will follow the guidance prescribed in sab no .
107 in connection with our adoption of sfas 123r .
information presented pursuant to the indentures of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) the following table sets forth information that is presented solely to address certain tower cash flow reporting requirements contained in the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .
the information contained in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements is also presented to address certain reporting requirements contained in the indenture for our ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .
the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005	$ 139590
consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ 498266
less : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	-524804 ( 524804 )
plus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005	558360
adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ 531822
non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ -30584 ( 30584 )

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was the adjusted consolidated cash flow?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] in the year of 2005, what was the total amount of the non-tower cash flow?
[Turn 2] and what was the adjusted consolidated cash flow?

Pre-table text:
with apb no .
25 .
instead , companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the related expense associated with share-based payments in the statement of operations .
sfas 123r is effective for us as of january 1 , 2006 .
we have historically accounted for share-based payments to employees under apb no .
25 2019s intrinsic value method .
as such , we generally have not recognized compensation expense for options granted to employees .
we will adopt the provisions of sfas 123r under the modified prospective method , in which compensation cost for all share-based payments granted or modified after the effective date is recognized based upon the requirements of sfas 123r , and compensation cost for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date that are unvested as of the effective date of sfas 123r is recognized based on sfas 123 .
tax benefits will be recognized related to the cost for share-based payments to the extent the equity instrument would ordinarily result in a future tax deduction under existing law .
tax expense will be recognized to write off excess deferred tax assets when the tax deduction upon settlement of a vested option is less than the expense recorded in the statement of operations ( to the extent not offset by prior tax credits for settlements where the tax deduction was greater than the fair value cost ) .
we estimate that we will recognize equity-based compensation expense of approximately $ 35 million to $ 38 million for the year ending december 31 , 2006 .
this amount is subject to revisions as we finalize certain assumptions related to 2006 , including the size and nature of awards and forfeiture rates .
sfas 123r also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow rather than as operating cash flow as was previously required .
we cannot estimate what the future tax benefits will be as the amounts depend on , among other factors , future employee stock option exercises .
due to the our tax loss position , there was no operating cash inflow realized for december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for such excess tax deductions .
in march 2005 , the sec issued staff accounting bulletin ( sab ) no .
107 regarding the staff 2019s interpretation of sfas 123r .
this interpretation provides the staff 2019s views regarding interactions between sfas 123r and certain sec rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies .
the interpretive guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of sfas 123r and investors and users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided .
we will follow the guidance prescribed in sab no .
107 in connection with our adoption of sfas 123r .
information presented pursuant to the indentures of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) the following table sets forth information that is presented solely to address certain tower cash flow reporting requirements contained in the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .
the information contained in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements is also presented to address certain reporting requirements contained in the indenture for our ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .
the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005	$ 139590
consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ 498266
less : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	-524804 ( 524804 )
plus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005	558360
adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ 531822
non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ -30584 ( 30584 )

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what, then, was that amount as a portion of this adjusted cash flow?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] in the year of 2005, what was the total amount of the non-tower cash flow?
[Turn 2] and what was the adjusted consolidated cash flow?
[Turn 3] what, then, was that amount as a portion of this adjusted cash flow?

Pre-table text:
with apb no .
25 .
instead , companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the related expense associated with share-based payments in the statement of operations .
sfas 123r is effective for us as of january 1 , 2006 .
we have historically accounted for share-based payments to employees under apb no .
25 2019s intrinsic value method .
as such , we generally have not recognized compensation expense for options granted to employees .
we will adopt the provisions of sfas 123r under the modified prospective method , in which compensation cost for all share-based payments granted or modified after the effective date is recognized based upon the requirements of sfas 123r , and compensation cost for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date that are unvested as of the effective date of sfas 123r is recognized based on sfas 123 .
tax benefits will be recognized related to the cost for share-based payments to the extent the equity instrument would ordinarily result in a future tax deduction under existing law .
tax expense will be recognized to write off excess deferred tax assets when the tax deduction upon settlement of a vested option is less than the expense recorded in the statement of operations ( to the extent not offset by prior tax credits for settlements where the tax deduction was greater than the fair value cost ) .
we estimate that we will recognize equity-based compensation expense of approximately $ 35 million to $ 38 million for the year ending december 31 , 2006 .
this amount is subject to revisions as we finalize certain assumptions related to 2006 , including the size and nature of awards and forfeiture rates .
sfas 123r also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow rather than as operating cash flow as was previously required .
we cannot estimate what the future tax benefits will be as the amounts depend on , among other factors , future employee stock option exercises .
due to the our tax loss position , there was no operating cash inflow realized for december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for such excess tax deductions .
in march 2005 , the sec issued staff accounting bulletin ( sab ) no .
107 regarding the staff 2019s interpretation of sfas 123r .
this interpretation provides the staff 2019s views regarding interactions between sfas 123r and certain sec rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies .
the interpretive guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of sfas 123r and investors and users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided .
we will follow the guidance prescribed in sab no .
107 in connection with our adoption of sfas 123r .
information presented pursuant to the indentures of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) the following table sets forth information that is presented solely to address certain tower cash flow reporting requirements contained in the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .
the information contained in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements is also presented to address certain reporting requirements contained in the indenture for our ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .
the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005	$ 139590
consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ 498266
less : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	-524804 ( 524804 )
plus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005	558360
adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ 531822
non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ -30584 ( 30584 )

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.