[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
how much, then, did the 2003 amount represent in relation to this 2002 one?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of inventories in 2003?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2002?
[Turn 3] how much, then, did the 2003 amount represent in relation to this 2002 one?

Pre-table text:
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .
a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .
an impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .
federal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .
operating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .
period and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .
the unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .
respective years or of future results .
the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .
periods benefited , typically five years .
for approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .
the company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .
share .
the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .
new capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .
the pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .
( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .
each the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .
receive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .
inventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .
the net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .

Table:
	2003	2002
finished goods	$ 384.3	$ 206.7
raw materials and work in progress	90.8	50.9
inventory step-up	52.6	2013
inventories net	$ 527.7	$ 257.6

Post-table text:
made by zimmer to implex pursuant to their existing alliance raw materials and work in progress 90.8 50.9 arrangement , escrow and other items .
the acquisition will be inventory step-up 52.6 2013 accounted for under the purchase method of accounting .
inventories , net $ 527.7 $ 257.6 reserves for obsolete and slow-moving inventory at4 .
change in accounting principle december 31 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 47.4 million and instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic $ 45.5 million , respectively .
provisions charged to expense surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical were $ 11.6 million , $ 6.0 million and $ 11.9 million for the procedures .
effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .
recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , amounts written off against the reserve were $ 11.7 million , plant and equipment .
undeployed instruments are carried at $ 7.1 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .
instruments in the december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .
field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .
following the acquisition of centerpulse , the company depreciation is computed using the straight-line method established a common approach for estimating excess based on average estimated useful lives , determined inventory and instruments .
this change in estimate resulted principally in reference to associated product life cycles , in a charge to earnings of $ 3.0 million after tax in the fourth primarily five years .
in accordance with sfas no .
144 , the quarter .
company reviews instruments for impairment whenever .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what is that excluding the portion equivalent to the 2002 amount?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of inventories in 2003?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2002?
[Turn 3] how much, then, did the 2003 amount represent in relation to this 2002 one?
[Turn 4] and what is that excluding the portion equivalent to the 2002 amount?

Pre-table text:
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .
a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .
an impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .
federal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .
operating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .
period and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .
the unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .
respective years or of future results .
the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .
periods benefited , typically five years .
for approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .
the company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .
share .
the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .
new capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .
the pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .
( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .
each the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .
receive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .
inventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .
the net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .

Table:
	2003	2002
finished goods	$ 384.3	$ 206.7
raw materials and work in progress	90.8	50.9
inventory step-up	52.6	2013
inventories net	$ 527.7	$ 257.6

Post-table text:
made by zimmer to implex pursuant to their existing alliance raw materials and work in progress 90.8 50.9 arrangement , escrow and other items .
the acquisition will be inventory step-up 52.6 2013 accounted for under the purchase method of accounting .
inventories , net $ 527.7 $ 257.6 reserves for obsolete and slow-moving inventory at4 .
change in accounting principle december 31 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 47.4 million and instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic $ 45.5 million , respectively .
provisions charged to expense surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical were $ 11.6 million , $ 6.0 million and $ 11.9 million for the procedures .
effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .
recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , amounts written off against the reserve were $ 11.7 million , plant and equipment .
undeployed instruments are carried at $ 7.1 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .
instruments in the december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .
field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .
following the acquisition of centerpulse , the company depreciation is computed using the straight-line method established a common approach for estimating excess based on average estimated useful lives , determined inventory and instruments .
this change in estimate resulted principally in reference to associated product life cycles , in a charge to earnings of $ 3.0 million after tax in the fourth primarily five years .
in accordance with sfas no .
144 , the quarter .
company reviews instruments for impairment whenever .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
between those same two years, what was the change in the total of finished goods, in millions?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of inventories in 2003?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2002?
[Turn 3] how much, then, did the 2003 amount represent in relation to this 2002 one?
[Turn 4] and what is that excluding the portion equivalent to the 2002 amount?
[Turn 5] between those same two years, what was the change in the total of finished goods, in millions?

Pre-table text:
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .
a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .
an impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .
federal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .
operating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .
period and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .
the unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .
respective years or of future results .
the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .
periods benefited , typically five years .
for approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .
the company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .
share .
the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .
new capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .
the pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .
( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .
each the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .
receive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .
inventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .
the net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .

Table:
	2003	2002
finished goods	$ 384.3	$ 206.7
raw materials and work in progress	90.8	50.9
inventory step-up	52.6	2013
inventories net	$ 527.7	$ 257.6

Post-table text:
made by zimmer to implex pursuant to their existing alliance raw materials and work in progress 90.8 50.9 arrangement , escrow and other items .
the acquisition will be inventory step-up 52.6 2013 accounted for under the purchase method of accounting .
inventories , net $ 527.7 $ 257.6 reserves for obsolete and slow-moving inventory at4 .
change in accounting principle december 31 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 47.4 million and instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic $ 45.5 million , respectively .
provisions charged to expense surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical were $ 11.6 million , $ 6.0 million and $ 11.9 million for the procedures .
effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .
recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , amounts written off against the reserve were $ 11.7 million , plant and equipment .
undeployed instruments are carried at $ 7.1 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .
instruments in the december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .
field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .
following the acquisition of centerpulse , the company depreciation is computed using the straight-line method established a common approach for estimating excess based on average estimated useful lives , determined inventory and instruments .
this change in estimate resulted principally in reference to associated product life cycles , in a charge to earnings of $ 3.0 million after tax in the fourth primarily five years .
in accordance with sfas no .
144 , the quarter .
company reviews instruments for impairment whenever .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the net change fair value of forward exchange contracts asset from 2010 to 2011?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the net change fair value of forward exchange contracts asset from 2010 to 2011?

Pre-table text:
we hold an interest rate swap agreement to hedge the benchmark interest rate of our $ 375 million 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) senior unsecured notes due july 1 , 2014 .
the effect of the swap is to convert our 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) fixed interest rate to a variable interest rate based on the three-month libor plus 2.05% ( 2.05 % ) ( 2.42% ( 2.42 % ) as of october 29 , 2011 ) .
in addition , we have a term loan facility of $ 145 million that bears interest at a fluctuating rate for each period equal to the libor rate corresponding with the tenor of the interest period plus a spread of 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) ( 1.61% ( 1.61 % ) as of october 29 , 2011 ) .
if libor increases by 100 basis points , our annual interest expense would increase by approximately $ 5 million .
however , this hypothetical change in interest rates would not impact the interest expense on our $ 375 million of 3% ( 3 % ) fixed-rate debt , which is not hedged .
as of october 30 , 2010 , a similar 100 basis point increase in libor would have resulted in an increase of approximately $ 4 million to our annual interest expense .
foreign currency exposure as more fully described in note 2i in the notes to consolidated financial statements contained in item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k , we regularly hedge our non-u.s .
dollar-based exposures by entering into forward foreign currency exchange contracts .
the terms of these contracts are for periods matching the duration of the underlying exposure and generally range from one month to twelve months .
currently , our largest foreign currency exposure is the euro , primarily because our european operations have the highest proportion of our local currency denominated expenses .
relative to foreign currency exposures existing at october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 , a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates over the course of the year would expose us to approximately $ 6 million in losses in earnings or cash flows .
the market risk associated with our derivative instruments results from currency exchange rates that are expected to offset the market risk of the underlying transactions , assets and liabilities being hedged .
the counterparties to the agreements relating to our foreign exchange instruments consist of a number of major international financial institutions with high credit ratings .
based on the credit ratings of our counterparties as of october 29 , 2011 , we do not believe that there is significant risk of nonperformance by them .
while the contract or notional amounts of derivative financial instruments provide one measure of the volume of these transactions , they do not represent the amount of our exposure to credit risk .
the amounts potentially subject to credit risk ( arising from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts ) are generally limited to the amounts , if any , by which the counterparties 2019 obligations under the contracts exceed our obligations to the counterparties .
the following table illustrates the effect that a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable or favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates , relative to the u.s .
dollar , would have on the fair value of our forward exchange contracts as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010: .

Table:
	october 29 2011	october 30 2010
fair value of forward exchange contracts asset	$ 2472	$ 7256
fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset	$ 17859	$ 22062
fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability	$ -13332 ( 13332 )	$ -7396 ( 7396 )

Post-table text:
fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 17859 $ 22062 fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ ( 13332 ) $ ( 7396 ) the calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the u.s .
dollar .
in addition to the direct effects of changes in exchange rates , such changes typically affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales price as competitors 2019 products become more or less attractive .
our sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in a potential change in sales levels or local currency selling prices. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what percentage change does this represent?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the net change fair value of forward exchange contracts asset from 2010 to 2011?
[Turn 2] what percentage change does this represent?

Pre-table text:
we hold an interest rate swap agreement to hedge the benchmark interest rate of our $ 375 million 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) senior unsecured notes due july 1 , 2014 .
the effect of the swap is to convert our 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) fixed interest rate to a variable interest rate based on the three-month libor plus 2.05% ( 2.05 % ) ( 2.42% ( 2.42 % ) as of october 29 , 2011 ) .
in addition , we have a term loan facility of $ 145 million that bears interest at a fluctuating rate for each period equal to the libor rate corresponding with the tenor of the interest period plus a spread of 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) ( 1.61% ( 1.61 % ) as of october 29 , 2011 ) .
if libor increases by 100 basis points , our annual interest expense would increase by approximately $ 5 million .
however , this hypothetical change in interest rates would not impact the interest expense on our $ 375 million of 3% ( 3 % ) fixed-rate debt , which is not hedged .
as of october 30 , 2010 , a similar 100 basis point increase in libor would have resulted in an increase of approximately $ 4 million to our annual interest expense .
foreign currency exposure as more fully described in note 2i in the notes to consolidated financial statements contained in item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k , we regularly hedge our non-u.s .
dollar-based exposures by entering into forward foreign currency exchange contracts .
the terms of these contracts are for periods matching the duration of the underlying exposure and generally range from one month to twelve months .
currently , our largest foreign currency exposure is the euro , primarily because our european operations have the highest proportion of our local currency denominated expenses .
relative to foreign currency exposures existing at october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 , a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates over the course of the year would expose us to approximately $ 6 million in losses in earnings or cash flows .
the market risk associated with our derivative instruments results from currency exchange rates that are expected to offset the market risk of the underlying transactions , assets and liabilities being hedged .
the counterparties to the agreements relating to our foreign exchange instruments consist of a number of major international financial institutions with high credit ratings .
based on the credit ratings of our counterparties as of october 29 , 2011 , we do not believe that there is significant risk of nonperformance by them .
while the contract or notional amounts of derivative financial instruments provide one measure of the volume of these transactions , they do not represent the amount of our exposure to credit risk .
the amounts potentially subject to credit risk ( arising from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts ) are generally limited to the amounts , if any , by which the counterparties 2019 obligations under the contracts exceed our obligations to the counterparties .
the following table illustrates the effect that a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable or favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates , relative to the u.s .
dollar , would have on the fair value of our forward exchange contracts as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010: .

Table:
	october 29 2011	october 30 2010
fair value of forward exchange contracts asset	$ 2472	$ 7256
fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset	$ 17859	$ 22062
fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability	$ -13332 ( 13332 )	$ -7396 ( 7396 )

Post-table text:
fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 17859 $ 22062 fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ ( 13332 ) $ ( 7396 ) the calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the u.s .
dollar .
in addition to the direct effects of changes in exchange rates , such changes typically affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales price as competitors 2019 products become more or less attractive .
our sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in a potential change in sales levels or local currency selling prices. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the change in the total cash flow between 2014 and 2015?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the total cash flow between 2014 and 2015?

Pre-table text:
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .

Table:
cash flow data	years ended december 31 , 2015	years ended december 31 , 2014	years ended december 31 , 2013
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1	$ 848.2	$ 831.2	$ 598.4
net cash used in working capital2	-117.5 ( 117.5 )	-131.1 ( 131.1 )	-9.6 ( 9.6 )
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash	-56.7 ( 56.7 )	-30.6 ( 30.6 )	4.1
net cash provided by operating activities	$ 674.0	$ 669.5	$ 592.9
net cash used in investing activities	-202.8 ( 202.8 )	-200.8 ( 200.8 )	-224.5 ( 224.5 )
net cash used in financing activities	-472.8 ( 472.8 )	-343.9 ( 343.9 )	-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )

Post-table text:
1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .
2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .
due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .
our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .
net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .
our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .
the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .
in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .
to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .
the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .
our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .
for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .
investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .
net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .
capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .
we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
so what was the percentage increase during this time?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the total cash flow between 2014 and 2015?
[Turn 2] so what was the percentage increase during this time?

Pre-table text:
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .

Table:
cash flow data	years ended december 31 , 2015	years ended december 31 , 2014	years ended december 31 , 2013
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1	$ 848.2	$ 831.2	$ 598.4
net cash used in working capital2	-117.5 ( 117.5 )	-131.1 ( 131.1 )	-9.6 ( 9.6 )
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash	-56.7 ( 56.7 )	-30.6 ( 30.6 )	4.1
net cash provided by operating activities	$ 674.0	$ 669.5	$ 592.9
net cash used in investing activities	-202.8 ( 202.8 )	-200.8 ( 200.8 )	-224.5 ( 224.5 )
net cash used in financing activities	-472.8 ( 472.8 )	-343.9 ( 343.9 )	-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )

Post-table text:
1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .
2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .
due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .
our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .
net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .
our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .
the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .
in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .
to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .
the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .
our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .
for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .
investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .
net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .
capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .
we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and converted from a decimal to a percentage?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the total cash flow between 2014 and 2015?
[Turn 2] so what was the percentage increase during this time?
[Turn 3] and converted from a decimal to a percentage?

Pre-table text:
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .

Table:
cash flow data	years ended december 31 , 2015	years ended december 31 , 2014	years ended december 31 , 2013
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1	$ 848.2	$ 831.2	$ 598.4
net cash used in working capital2	-117.5 ( 117.5 )	-131.1 ( 131.1 )	-9.6 ( 9.6 )
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash	-56.7 ( 56.7 )	-30.6 ( 30.6 )	4.1
net cash provided by operating activities	$ 674.0	$ 669.5	$ 592.9
net cash used in investing activities	-202.8 ( 202.8 )	-200.8 ( 200.8 )	-224.5 ( 224.5 )
net cash used in financing activities	-472.8 ( 472.8 )	-343.9 ( 343.9 )	-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )

Post-table text:
1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .
2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .
due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .
our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .
net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .
our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .
the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .
in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .
to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .
the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .
our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .
for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .
investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .
net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .
capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .
we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the net change in cash from operating and investing activities?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the total cash flow between 2014 and 2015?
[Turn 2] so what was the percentage increase during this time?
[Turn 3] and converted from a decimal to a percentage?
[Turn 4] what was the net change in cash from operating and investing activities?

Pre-table text:
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .

Table:
cash flow data	years ended december 31 , 2015	years ended december 31 , 2014	years ended december 31 , 2013
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1	$ 848.2	$ 831.2	$ 598.4
net cash used in working capital2	-117.5 ( 117.5 )	-131.1 ( 131.1 )	-9.6 ( 9.6 )
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash	-56.7 ( 56.7 )	-30.6 ( 30.6 )	4.1
net cash provided by operating activities	$ 674.0	$ 669.5	$ 592.9
net cash used in investing activities	-202.8 ( 202.8 )	-200.8 ( 200.8 )	-224.5 ( 224.5 )
net cash used in financing activities	-472.8 ( 472.8 )	-343.9 ( 343.9 )	-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )

Post-table text:
1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .
2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .
due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .
our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .
net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .
our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .
the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .
in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .
to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .
the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .
our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .
for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .
investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .
net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .
capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .
we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and the total net change in cash for 2015?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the total cash flow between 2014 and 2015?
[Turn 2] so what was the percentage increase during this time?
[Turn 3] and converted from a decimal to a percentage?
[Turn 4] what was the net change in cash from operating and investing activities?
[Turn 5] and the total net change in cash for 2015?

Pre-table text:
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .

Table:
cash flow data	years ended december 31 , 2015	years ended december 31 , 2014	years ended december 31 , 2013
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1	$ 848.2	$ 831.2	$ 598.4
net cash used in working capital2	-117.5 ( 117.5 )	-131.1 ( 131.1 )	-9.6 ( 9.6 )
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash	-56.7 ( 56.7 )	-30.6 ( 30.6 )	4.1
net cash provided by operating activities	$ 674.0	$ 669.5	$ 592.9
net cash used in investing activities	-202.8 ( 202.8 )	-200.8 ( 200.8 )	-224.5 ( 224.5 )
net cash used in financing activities	-472.8 ( 472.8 )	-343.9 ( 343.9 )	-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )

Post-table text:
1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .
2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .
due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .
our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .
net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .
our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .
the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .
in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .
to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .
the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .
our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .
for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .
investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .
net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .
capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .
we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what were operating leases in 2007?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what were operating leases in 2007?

Pre-table text:
abiomed , inc .
and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( 7 ) commitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no .
45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no .
5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no .
34 ( fin no .
45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses .
these disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no .
5 accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote .
the following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor .
product warranties 2014the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale .
the ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards .
operating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision .
patent indemnifications 2014in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products .
the indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims .
the company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions .
under the provisions of fin no .
45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only .
as of march 31 , 2006 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 .
the danvers lease may be extended , at the company 2019s option , for two successive additional periods of five years each with monthly rent charges to be determined based on then current fair rental values .
the company 2019s lease for its aachen location expires in august 2008 unless an option to extend for an additional four years is exercised by the company .
in december 2005 we closed our office facility in the netherlands , recording a charge of approximately $ 58000 for the remaining lease term .
total rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations approximated $ 821000 , $ 824000 and $ 1262000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2004 , 2005 and 2006 , respectively .
future minimum lease payments under all significant non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2006 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : fiscal year ending march 31 , operating leases .

Table:
fiscal year ending march 31,	operating leases
2007	1703
2008	1371
2009	1035
2010	710
total future minimum lease payments	$ 4819

Post-table text:
from time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types .
while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , cash flow and results .
on may 15 , 2006 richard a .
nazarian , as selling stockholder representative , filed a demand for arbitration ( subsequently amended ) with the boston office of the american arbitration association .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what were they in 2008?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what were operating leases in 2007?
[Turn 2] what were they in 2008?

Pre-table text:
abiomed , inc .
and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( 7 ) commitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no .
45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no .
5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no .
34 ( fin no .
45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses .
these disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no .
5 accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote .
the following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor .
product warranties 2014the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale .
the ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards .
operating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision .
patent indemnifications 2014in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products .
the indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims .
the company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions .
under the provisions of fin no .
45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only .
as of march 31 , 2006 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 .
the danvers lease may be extended , at the company 2019s option , for two successive additional periods of five years each with monthly rent charges to be determined based on then current fair rental values .
the company 2019s lease for its aachen location expires in august 2008 unless an option to extend for an additional four years is exercised by the company .
in december 2005 we closed our office facility in the netherlands , recording a charge of approximately $ 58000 for the remaining lease term .
total rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations approximated $ 821000 , $ 824000 and $ 1262000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2004 , 2005 and 2006 , respectively .
future minimum lease payments under all significant non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2006 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : fiscal year ending march 31 , operating leases .

Table:
fiscal year ending march 31,	operating leases
2007	1703
2008	1371
2009	1035
2010	710
total future minimum lease payments	$ 4819

Post-table text:
from time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types .
while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , cash flow and results .
on may 15 , 2006 richard a .
nazarian , as selling stockholder representative , filed a demand for arbitration ( subsequently amended ) with the boston office of the american arbitration association .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the net change from 2007 to 2008?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what were operating leases in 2007?
[Turn 2] what were they in 2008?
[Turn 3] what is the net change from 2007 to 2008?

Pre-table text:
abiomed , inc .
and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( 7 ) commitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no .
45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no .
5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no .
34 ( fin no .
45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses .
these disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no .
5 accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote .
the following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor .
product warranties 2014the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale .
the ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards .
operating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision .
patent indemnifications 2014in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products .
the indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims .
the company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions .
under the provisions of fin no .
45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only .
as of march 31 , 2006 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 .
the danvers lease may be extended , at the company 2019s option , for two successive additional periods of five years each with monthly rent charges to be determined based on then current fair rental values .
the company 2019s lease for its aachen location expires in august 2008 unless an option to extend for an additional four years is exercised by the company .
in december 2005 we closed our office facility in the netherlands , recording a charge of approximately $ 58000 for the remaining lease term .
total rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations approximated $ 821000 , $ 824000 and $ 1262000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2004 , 2005 and 2006 , respectively .
future minimum lease payments under all significant non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2006 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : fiscal year ending march 31 , operating leases .

Table:
fiscal year ending march 31,	operating leases
2007	1703
2008	1371
2009	1035
2010	710
total future minimum lease payments	$ 4819

Post-table text:
from time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types .
while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , cash flow and results .
on may 15 , 2006 richard a .
nazarian , as selling stockholder representative , filed a demand for arbitration ( subsequently amended ) with the boston office of the american arbitration association .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the 2007 value?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what were operating leases in 2007?
[Turn 2] what were they in 2008?
[Turn 3] what is the net change from 2007 to 2008?
[Turn 4] what was the 2007 value?

Pre-table text:
abiomed , inc .
and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( 7 ) commitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no .
45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no .
5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no .
34 ( fin no .
45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses .
these disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no .
5 accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote .
the following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor .
product warranties 2014the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale .
the ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards .
operating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision .
patent indemnifications 2014in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products .
the indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims .
the company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions .
under the provisions of fin no .
45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only .
as of march 31 , 2006 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 .
the danvers lease may be extended , at the company 2019s option , for two successive additional periods of five years each with monthly rent charges to be determined based on then current fair rental values .
the company 2019s lease for its aachen location expires in august 2008 unless an option to extend for an additional four years is exercised by the company .
in december 2005 we closed our office facility in the netherlands , recording a charge of approximately $ 58000 for the remaining lease term .
total rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations approximated $ 821000 , $ 824000 and $ 1262000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2004 , 2005 and 2006 , respectively .
future minimum lease payments under all significant non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2006 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : fiscal year ending march 31 , operating leases .

Table:
fiscal year ending march 31,	operating leases
2007	1703
2008	1371
2009	1035
2010	710
total future minimum lease payments	$ 4819

Post-table text:
from time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types .
while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , cash flow and results .
on may 15 , 2006 richard a .
nazarian , as selling stockholder representative , filed a demand for arbitration ( subsequently amended ) with the boston office of the american arbitration association .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the percent decrease?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what were operating leases in 2007?
[Turn 2] what were they in 2008?
[Turn 3] what is the net change from 2007 to 2008?
[Turn 4] what was the 2007 value?
[Turn 5] what is the percent decrease?

Pre-table text:
abiomed , inc .
and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( 7 ) commitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no .
45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no .
5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no .
34 ( fin no .
45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses .
these disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no .
5 accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote .
the following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor .
product warranties 2014the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale .
the ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards .
operating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision .
patent indemnifications 2014in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products .
the indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims .
the company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions .
under the provisions of fin no .
45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only .
as of march 31 , 2006 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 .
the danvers lease may be extended , at the company 2019s option , for two successive additional periods of five years each with monthly rent charges to be determined based on then current fair rental values .
the company 2019s lease for its aachen location expires in august 2008 unless an option to extend for an additional four years is exercised by the company .
in december 2005 we closed our office facility in the netherlands , recording a charge of approximately $ 58000 for the remaining lease term .
total rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations approximated $ 821000 , $ 824000 and $ 1262000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2004 , 2005 and 2006 , respectively .
future minimum lease payments under all significant non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2006 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : fiscal year ending march 31 , operating leases .

Table:
fiscal year ending march 31,	operating leases
2007	1703
2008	1371
2009	1035
2010	710
total future minimum lease payments	$ 4819

Post-table text:
from time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types .
while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , cash flow and results .
on may 15 , 2006 richard a .
nazarian , as selling stockholder representative , filed a demand for arbitration ( subsequently amended ) with the boston office of the american arbitration association .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the sum of the average backlog at year-end in 2014 and 2015?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the sum of the average backlog at year-end in 2014 and 2015?

Pre-table text:
backlog backlog decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to sales being recognized on several multi-year programs ( such as hmsc , nisc iii , ciog and nsf asc ) related to prior year awards and a limited number of large new business awards .
backlog decreased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower customer funding levels and declining activities on direct warfighter support programs impacted by defense budget reductions .
trends we expect is&gs 2019 2016 net sales to decline in the high-single digit percentage range as compared to 2015 , primarily driven by key loss contracts in an increasingly competitive environment , along with volume contraction on the segment 2019s major contracts .
operating profit is expected to decline at a higher percentage range in 2016 , as compared to net sales percentage declines , driven by higher margin program losses and re-compete programs awarded at lower margins .
accordingly , 2016 margins are expected to be lower than 2015 results .
missiles and fire control our mfc business segment provides air and missile defense systems ; tactical missiles and air-to-ground precision strike weapon systems ; logistics ; fire control systems ; mission operations support , readiness , engineering support and integration services ; manned and unmanned ground vehicles ; and energy management solutions .
mfc 2019s major programs include pac-3 , thaad , multiple launch rocket system , hellfire , jassm , javelin , apache , sniper ae , low altitude navigation and targeting infrared for night ( lantirn ae ) and sof clss .
mfc 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2015	2014	2013
net sales	$ 6770	$ 7092	$ 6795
operating profit	1282	1344	1379
operating margins	18.9% ( 18.9 % )	19.0% ( 19.0 % )	20.3% ( 20.3 % )
backlog at year-end	$ 15500	$ 13300	$ 14300

Post-table text:
2015 compared to 2014 mfc 2019s net sales in 2015 decreased $ 322 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to the same period in 2014 .
the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 345 million for air and missile defense programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily pac-3 ) and lower volume ( primarily thaad ) ; and approximately $ 85 million for tactical missile programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily guided multiple launch rocket system ( gmlrs ) ) and joint air-to-surface standoff missile , partially offset by increased deliveries for hellfire .
these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 55 million for energy solutions programs due to increased volume .
mfc 2019s operating profit in 2015 decreased $ 62 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2014 .
the decrease was attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 100 million for fire control programs due primarily to lower risk retirements ( primarily lantirn and sniper ) ; and approximately $ 65 million for tactical missile programs due to lower risk retirements ( primarily hellfire and gmlrs ) and fewer deliveries .
these decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 75 million for air and missile defense programs due to increased risk retirements ( primarily thaad ) .
adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 60 million lower in 2015 compared to 2014 .
2014 compared to 2013 mfc 2019s net sales increased $ 297 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .
the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 180 million for air and missile defense programs primarily due to increased volume for thaad ; about $ 115 million for fire control programs due to increased deliveries ( including apache ) ; and about $ 125 million for various other programs due to increased volume .
these increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 115 million for tactical missile programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily high mobility artillery rocket system and army tactical missile system ) .
mfc 2019s operating profit decreased $ 35 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .
the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 20 million for tactical missile programs due to net warranty reserve adjustments for various programs ( including jassm and gmlrs ) and fewer deliveries ; and approximately $ 45 million for various other programs due to lower risk retirements .
the decreases were offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 20 million for air and missile defense programs due to increased volume ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the sum including the 2013 value?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the sum of the average backlog at year-end in 2014 and 2015?
[Turn 2] what is the sum including the 2013 value?

Pre-table text:
backlog backlog decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to sales being recognized on several multi-year programs ( such as hmsc , nisc iii , ciog and nsf asc ) related to prior year awards and a limited number of large new business awards .
backlog decreased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower customer funding levels and declining activities on direct warfighter support programs impacted by defense budget reductions .
trends we expect is&gs 2019 2016 net sales to decline in the high-single digit percentage range as compared to 2015 , primarily driven by key loss contracts in an increasingly competitive environment , along with volume contraction on the segment 2019s major contracts .
operating profit is expected to decline at a higher percentage range in 2016 , as compared to net sales percentage declines , driven by higher margin program losses and re-compete programs awarded at lower margins .
accordingly , 2016 margins are expected to be lower than 2015 results .
missiles and fire control our mfc business segment provides air and missile defense systems ; tactical missiles and air-to-ground precision strike weapon systems ; logistics ; fire control systems ; mission operations support , readiness , engineering support and integration services ; manned and unmanned ground vehicles ; and energy management solutions .
mfc 2019s major programs include pac-3 , thaad , multiple launch rocket system , hellfire , jassm , javelin , apache , sniper ae , low altitude navigation and targeting infrared for night ( lantirn ae ) and sof clss .
mfc 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2015	2014	2013
net sales	$ 6770	$ 7092	$ 6795
operating profit	1282	1344	1379
operating margins	18.9% ( 18.9 % )	19.0% ( 19.0 % )	20.3% ( 20.3 % )
backlog at year-end	$ 15500	$ 13300	$ 14300

Post-table text:
2015 compared to 2014 mfc 2019s net sales in 2015 decreased $ 322 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to the same period in 2014 .
the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 345 million for air and missile defense programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily pac-3 ) and lower volume ( primarily thaad ) ; and approximately $ 85 million for tactical missile programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily guided multiple launch rocket system ( gmlrs ) ) and joint air-to-surface standoff missile , partially offset by increased deliveries for hellfire .
these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 55 million for energy solutions programs due to increased volume .
mfc 2019s operating profit in 2015 decreased $ 62 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2014 .
the decrease was attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 100 million for fire control programs due primarily to lower risk retirements ( primarily lantirn and sniper ) ; and approximately $ 65 million for tactical missile programs due to lower risk retirements ( primarily hellfire and gmlrs ) and fewer deliveries .
these decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 75 million for air and missile defense programs due to increased risk retirements ( primarily thaad ) .
adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 60 million lower in 2015 compared to 2014 .
2014 compared to 2013 mfc 2019s net sales increased $ 297 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .
the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 180 million for air and missile defense programs primarily due to increased volume for thaad ; about $ 115 million for fire control programs due to increased deliveries ( including apache ) ; and about $ 125 million for various other programs due to increased volume .
these increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 115 million for tactical missile programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily high mobility artillery rocket system and army tactical missile system ) .
mfc 2019s operating profit decreased $ 35 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .
the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 20 million for tactical missile programs due to net warranty reserve adjustments for various programs ( including jassm and gmlrs ) and fewer deliveries ; and approximately $ 45 million for various other programs due to lower risk retirements .
the decreases were offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 20 million for air and missile defense programs due to increased volume ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is that divided by 3?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the sum of the average backlog at year-end in 2014 and 2015?
[Turn 2] what is the sum including the 2013 value?
[Turn 3] what is that divided by 3?

Pre-table text:
backlog backlog decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to sales being recognized on several multi-year programs ( such as hmsc , nisc iii , ciog and nsf asc ) related to prior year awards and a limited number of large new business awards .
backlog decreased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower customer funding levels and declining activities on direct warfighter support programs impacted by defense budget reductions .
trends we expect is&gs 2019 2016 net sales to decline in the high-single digit percentage range as compared to 2015 , primarily driven by key loss contracts in an increasingly competitive environment , along with volume contraction on the segment 2019s major contracts .
operating profit is expected to decline at a higher percentage range in 2016 , as compared to net sales percentage declines , driven by higher margin program losses and re-compete programs awarded at lower margins .
accordingly , 2016 margins are expected to be lower than 2015 results .
missiles and fire control our mfc business segment provides air and missile defense systems ; tactical missiles and air-to-ground precision strike weapon systems ; logistics ; fire control systems ; mission operations support , readiness , engineering support and integration services ; manned and unmanned ground vehicles ; and energy management solutions .
mfc 2019s major programs include pac-3 , thaad , multiple launch rocket system , hellfire , jassm , javelin , apache , sniper ae , low altitude navigation and targeting infrared for night ( lantirn ae ) and sof clss .
mfc 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2015	2014	2013
net sales	$ 6770	$ 7092	$ 6795
operating profit	1282	1344	1379
operating margins	18.9% ( 18.9 % )	19.0% ( 19.0 % )	20.3% ( 20.3 % )
backlog at year-end	$ 15500	$ 13300	$ 14300

Post-table text:
2015 compared to 2014 mfc 2019s net sales in 2015 decreased $ 322 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to the same period in 2014 .
the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 345 million for air and missile defense programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily pac-3 ) and lower volume ( primarily thaad ) ; and approximately $ 85 million for tactical missile programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily guided multiple launch rocket system ( gmlrs ) ) and joint air-to-surface standoff missile , partially offset by increased deliveries for hellfire .
these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 55 million for energy solutions programs due to increased volume .
mfc 2019s operating profit in 2015 decreased $ 62 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2014 .
the decrease was attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 100 million for fire control programs due primarily to lower risk retirements ( primarily lantirn and sniper ) ; and approximately $ 65 million for tactical missile programs due to lower risk retirements ( primarily hellfire and gmlrs ) and fewer deliveries .
these decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 75 million for air and missile defense programs due to increased risk retirements ( primarily thaad ) .
adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 60 million lower in 2015 compared to 2014 .
2014 compared to 2013 mfc 2019s net sales increased $ 297 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .
the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 180 million for air and missile defense programs primarily due to increased volume for thaad ; about $ 115 million for fire control programs due to increased deliveries ( including apache ) ; and about $ 125 million for various other programs due to increased volume .
these increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 115 million for tactical missile programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily high mobility artillery rocket system and army tactical missile system ) .
mfc 2019s operating profit decreased $ 35 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .
the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 20 million for tactical missile programs due to net warranty reserve adjustments for various programs ( including jassm and gmlrs ) and fewer deliveries ; and approximately $ 45 million for various other programs due to lower risk retirements .
the decreases were offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 20 million for air and missile defense programs due to increased volume ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.