[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was, then, in billions, the total unpaid principal balance outstanding in both years combined?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs in 2011, in billions?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2010, also in billions?
[Turn 3] what was, then, in billions, the total unpaid principal balance outstanding in both years combined?

Pre-table text:
the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2012 estimated expense as a baseline .
change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2012 pension expense ( in millions ) .

Table:
change in assumption ( a )	estimatedincrease to 2012pensionexpense ( in millions )
.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate	$ 23
.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets	$ 18
.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate	$ 2

Post-table text:
( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant .
our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions .
investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of permitted contributions in future years .
also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan .
we do not expect to be required by law to make any contributions to the plan during 2012 .
we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees .
recourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 3 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , pnc has sold commercial mortgage and residential mortgage loans directly or indirectly in securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions with continuing involvement .
one form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets in these transactions .
commercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate , close , and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s delegated underwriting and servicing ( dus ) program .
we participated in a similar program with the fhlmc .
under these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement .
at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 13.0 billion and $ 13.2 billion , respectively .
the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 4.0 billion at both december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 .
we maintain a reserve for estimated losses based on our exposure .
the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 47 million and $ 54 million as of december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .
if payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses .
our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment .
residential mortgage loan and home equity repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors .
these loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements .
residential mortgage loans covered by these loan repurchase obligations include first and second-lien mortgage loans we have sold through agency securitizations , non-agency securitizations , and whole-loan sale transactions .
as discussed in note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , agency securitizations consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with fnma , fhlmc , and the government national mortgage association ( gnma ) program , while non-agency securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with private investors .
our historical exposure and activity associated with agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with fnma and fhlmc , as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with federal housing agency ( fha ) and department of veterans affairs ( va ) -insured and uninsured loans pooled in gnma securitizations historically have been minimal .
repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment .
pnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition .
pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of the whole-loans sold in these transactions .
repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity lines/loans are reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment .
loan covenants and representations and warranties are established through loan sale agreements with various investors to provide assurance that pnc has sold loans to the pnc financial services group , inc .
2013 form 10-k 69 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what is the average between them, in billions?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs in 2011, in billions?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2010, also in billions?
[Turn 3] what was, then, in billions, the total unpaid principal balance outstanding in both years combined?
[Turn 4] and what is the average between them, in billions?

Pre-table text:
the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2012 estimated expense as a baseline .
change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2012 pension expense ( in millions ) .

Table:
change in assumption ( a )	estimatedincrease to 2012pensionexpense ( in millions )
.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate	$ 23
.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets	$ 18
.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate	$ 2

Post-table text:
( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant .
our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions .
investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of permitted contributions in future years .
also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan .
we do not expect to be required by law to make any contributions to the plan during 2012 .
we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees .
recourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 3 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , pnc has sold commercial mortgage and residential mortgage loans directly or indirectly in securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions with continuing involvement .
one form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets in these transactions .
commercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate , close , and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s delegated underwriting and servicing ( dus ) program .
we participated in a similar program with the fhlmc .
under these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement .
at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 13.0 billion and $ 13.2 billion , respectively .
the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 4.0 billion at both december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 .
we maintain a reserve for estimated losses based on our exposure .
the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 47 million and $ 54 million as of december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .
if payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses .
our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment .
residential mortgage loan and home equity repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors .
these loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements .
residential mortgage loans covered by these loan repurchase obligations include first and second-lien mortgage loans we have sold through agency securitizations , non-agency securitizations , and whole-loan sale transactions .
as discussed in note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , agency securitizations consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with fnma , fhlmc , and the government national mortgage association ( gnma ) program , while non-agency securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with private investors .
our historical exposure and activity associated with agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with fnma and fhlmc , as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with federal housing agency ( fha ) and department of veterans affairs ( va ) -insured and uninsured loans pooled in gnma securitizations historically have been minimal .
repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment .
pnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition .
pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of the whole-loans sold in these transactions .
repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity lines/loans are reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment .
loan covenants and representations and warranties are established through loan sale agreements with various investors to provide assurance that pnc has sold loans to the pnc financial services group , inc .
2013 form 10-k 69 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the change in the return of the kbw bank index from 2009 to 2014?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the return of the kbw bank index from 2009 to 2014?

Pre-table text:
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 63 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .
( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .
the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s .
equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .
the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .
and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .
the s&p financial index is an index of 85 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .
the firm is a component of all three industry indices .
the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .
the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .
december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 .

Table:
december 31 ( in dollars )	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014
jpmorgan chase	$ 100.00	$ 102.30	$ 81.87	$ 111.49	$ 152.42	$ 167.48
kbw bank index	100.00	123.36	94.75	125.91	173.45	189.69
s&p financial index	100.00	112.13	93.00	119.73	162.34	186.98
s&p 500 index	100.00	115.06	117.48	136.27	180.39	205.07

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and how much does this change represent in relation to that return in 2009?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the return of the kbw bank index from 2009 to 2014?
[Turn 2] and how much does this change represent in relation to that return in 2009?

Pre-table text:
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 63 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .
( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .
the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s .
equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .
the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .
and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .
the s&p financial index is an index of 85 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .
the firm is a component of all three industry indices .
the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .
the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .
december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 .

Table:
december 31 ( in dollars )	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014
jpmorgan chase	$ 100.00	$ 102.30	$ 81.87	$ 111.49	$ 152.42	$ 167.48
kbw bank index	100.00	123.36	94.75	125.91	173.45	189.69
s&p financial index	100.00	112.13	93.00	119.73	162.34	186.98
s&p 500 index	100.00	115.06	117.48	136.27	180.39	205.07

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the sum of carrying value of notes due 2014 and 2015?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the sum of carrying value of notes due 2014 and 2015?

Pre-table text:
long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2013 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value .

Table:
( in millions )	maturity amount	unamortized discount	carrying value	fair value
3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2014	$ 1000	$ 2014	$ 1000	$ 1029
1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015	750	2014	750	759
6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017	700	-2 ( 2 )	698	812
5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019	1000	-2 ( 2 )	998	1140
4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021	750	-3 ( 3 )	747	799
3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022	750	-4 ( 4 )	746	745
total long-term borrowings	$ 4950	$ -11 ( 11 )	$ 4939	$ 5284

Post-table text:
long-term borrowings at december 31 , 2012 had a carrying value of $ 5.687 billion and a fair value of $ 6.275 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2012 .
2015 and 2022 notes .
in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .
net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .
interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .
the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .
the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
2013 and 2021 notes .
in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .
net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .
( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) .
interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year .
the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
the 2021 notes were issued at a discount of $ 4 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs for the $ 1.5 billion note issuances , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
in may 2011 , in conjunction with the issuance of the 2013 floating rate notes , the company entered into a $ 750 million notional interest rate swap maturing in 2013 to hedge the future cash flows of its obligation at a fixed rate of 1.03% ( 1.03 % ) .
during the second quarter of 2013 , the interest rate swap matured and the 2013 floating rate notes were fully repaid .
2012 , 2014 and 2019 notes .
in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2014 and 2019 , respectively .
net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors ( 201cbgi 201d ) from barclays on december 1 , 2009 ( the 201cbgi transaction 201d ) , and for general corporate purposes .
interest on the 2014 notes and 2019 notes of approximately $ 35 million and $ 50 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year .
these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
these notes were issued collectively at a discount of $ 5 million , which is being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 13 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of these notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
2017 notes .
in september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) .
a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund of funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes .
interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year .
the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the sum including those due in 2017?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the sum of carrying value of notes due 2014 and 2015?
[Turn 2] what is the sum including those due in 2017?

Pre-table text:
long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2013 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value .

Table:
( in millions )	maturity amount	unamortized discount	carrying value	fair value
3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2014	$ 1000	$ 2014	$ 1000	$ 1029
1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015	750	2014	750	759
6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017	700	-2 ( 2 )	698	812
5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019	1000	-2 ( 2 )	998	1140
4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021	750	-3 ( 3 )	747	799
3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022	750	-4 ( 4 )	746	745
total long-term borrowings	$ 4950	$ -11 ( 11 )	$ 4939	$ 5284

Post-table text:
long-term borrowings at december 31 , 2012 had a carrying value of $ 5.687 billion and a fair value of $ 6.275 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2012 .
2015 and 2022 notes .
in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .
net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .
interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .
the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .
the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
2013 and 2021 notes .
in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .
net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .
( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) .
interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year .
the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
the 2021 notes were issued at a discount of $ 4 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs for the $ 1.5 billion note issuances , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
in may 2011 , in conjunction with the issuance of the 2013 floating rate notes , the company entered into a $ 750 million notional interest rate swap maturing in 2013 to hedge the future cash flows of its obligation at a fixed rate of 1.03% ( 1.03 % ) .
during the second quarter of 2013 , the interest rate swap matured and the 2013 floating rate notes were fully repaid .
2012 , 2014 and 2019 notes .
in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2014 and 2019 , respectively .
net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors ( 201cbgi 201d ) from barclays on december 1 , 2009 ( the 201cbgi transaction 201d ) , and for general corporate purposes .
interest on the 2014 notes and 2019 notes of approximately $ 35 million and $ 50 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year .
these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
these notes were issued collectively at a discount of $ 5 million , which is being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 13 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of these notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
2017 notes .
in september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) .
a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund of funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes .
interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year .
the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the net change in amortized cost during 2009?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the net change in amortized cost during 2009?

Pre-table text:
impairment net unrealized losses on securities available for sale were as follows as of december 31: .

Table:
( in millions )	2009	2008
fair value	$ 72699	$ 54163
amortized cost	74843	60786
net unrealized loss pre-tax	$ -2144 ( 2144 )	$ -6623 ( 6623 )
net unrealized loss after-tax	$ -1316 ( 1316 )	$ -4057 ( 4057 )

Post-table text:
the above net unrealized loss amounts at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 excluded the remaining net unrealized loss of $ 1.01 billion , or $ 635 million after-tax , and $ 2.27 billion , or $ 1.39 billion after- tax , respectively , related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .
these after-tax amounts are recorded in other comprehensive income .
the decline in the remaining after-tax unrealized loss amounts related to transferred securities resulted from amortization and from the recognition of losses from other-than-temporary impairment on certain of the securities .
we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .
to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .
the credit component is recognized in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that management does not intend to sell the security ( see note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8 ) .
the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation of economic and security- specific factors , which are more fully described in note 3 .
such factors are based upon estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .
to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular the credit component that would be recognized in our consolidated statement of income .
national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national hpi , have declined to date approximately 30% ( 30 % ) peak-to-current .
management currently estimates that national housing prices will continue to decline and bottom out during the second half of 2010 , consistent with a peak-to-trough housing price decline of approximately 37% ( 37 % ) .
as an indication of the sensitivity of our portfolio with respect to our more significant assumptions underlying our assessment of impairment , if we were to increase our default estimates to 110% ( 110 % ) of management 2019s current expectations with a corresponding slowing of prepayment speeds to 90% ( 90 % ) of management 2019s current expectations , credit-related other-than-temporary impairment could increase by approximately $ 120 million to $ 125 million , which impairment would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .
excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining securities and the resulting net unrealized losses to be temporary and not the result of any material changes in the credit characteristics of the securities .
additional information about our assessment of impairment is provided in note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is that over the 2008 value?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the net change in amortized cost during 2009?
[Turn 2] what is that over the 2008 value?

Pre-table text:
impairment net unrealized losses on securities available for sale were as follows as of december 31: .

Table:
( in millions )	2009	2008
fair value	$ 72699	$ 54163
amortized cost	74843	60786
net unrealized loss pre-tax	$ -2144 ( 2144 )	$ -6623 ( 6623 )
net unrealized loss after-tax	$ -1316 ( 1316 )	$ -4057 ( 4057 )

Post-table text:
the above net unrealized loss amounts at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 excluded the remaining net unrealized loss of $ 1.01 billion , or $ 635 million after-tax , and $ 2.27 billion , or $ 1.39 billion after- tax , respectively , related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .
these after-tax amounts are recorded in other comprehensive income .
the decline in the remaining after-tax unrealized loss amounts related to transferred securities resulted from amortization and from the recognition of losses from other-than-temporary impairment on certain of the securities .
we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .
to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .
the credit component is recognized in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that management does not intend to sell the security ( see note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8 ) .
the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation of economic and security- specific factors , which are more fully described in note 3 .
such factors are based upon estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .
to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular the credit component that would be recognized in our consolidated statement of income .
national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national hpi , have declined to date approximately 30% ( 30 % ) peak-to-current .
management currently estimates that national housing prices will continue to decline and bottom out during the second half of 2010 , consistent with a peak-to-trough housing price decline of approximately 37% ( 37 % ) .
as an indication of the sensitivity of our portfolio with respect to our more significant assumptions underlying our assessment of impairment , if we were to increase our default estimates to 110% ( 110 % ) of management 2019s current expectations with a corresponding slowing of prepayment speeds to 90% ( 90 % ) of management 2019s current expectations , credit-related other-than-temporary impairment could increase by approximately $ 120 million to $ 125 million , which impairment would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .
excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining securities and the resulting net unrealized losses to be temporary and not the result of any material changes in the credit characteristics of the securities .
additional information about our assessment of impairment is provided in note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what were the sales proceeds from cilcorp/medina valley in january 2003?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what were the sales proceeds from cilcorp/medina valley in january 2003?

Pre-table text:
transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses .
these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions .
the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows ; however , there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond .
asset sales during 2003 , we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries .
this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity .
the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003 .
sales proceeds project name date completed ( in millions ) location .

Table:
project name	date completed	sales proceeds ( in millions )	location
cilcorp/medina valley	january 2003	$ 495	united states
aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart	january 2003	$ 59	australia
mountainview	march 2003	$ 30	united states
kelvin	march 2003	$ 29	south africa
songas	april 2003	$ 94	tanzania
aes barry limited	july 2003	a340/$ 62	united kingdom
aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd	december 2003	$ 145	bangladesh
aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi	august 2003	$ 23	republic of georgia
medway power limited/aes medway operations limited	november 2003	a347/$ 78	united kingdom
aes oasis limited	december 2003	$ 150	pakistan/oman

Post-table text:
the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future .
however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet .
for any sales that happen in the future , there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries .
depending on which businesses are eventually sold , the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations .
furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve .
subsidiary restructuring during 2003 , we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses .
the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities .
businesses impacted include eletropaulo , tiete , uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile .
brazil eletropaulo .
aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998 , when the company was privatized .
in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it .
aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo , including both common and preferred shares , through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 ( 2018 2018bndes 2019 2019 ) , and its wholly-owned subsidiary , bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a .
( 2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019 ) , to aes 2019s subsidiaries , aes elpa s.a .
( 2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019 ) and aes transgas empreendimentos , s.a .
( 2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019 ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what were the proceeds from aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart in january 2003?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what were the sales proceeds from cilcorp/medina valley in january 2003?
[Turn 2] what were the proceeds from aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart in january 2003?

Pre-table text:
transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses .
these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions .
the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows ; however , there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond .
asset sales during 2003 , we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries .
this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity .
the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003 .
sales proceeds project name date completed ( in millions ) location .

Table:
project name	date completed	sales proceeds ( in millions )	location
cilcorp/medina valley	january 2003	$ 495	united states
aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart	january 2003	$ 59	australia
mountainview	march 2003	$ 30	united states
kelvin	march 2003	$ 29	south africa
songas	april 2003	$ 94	tanzania
aes barry limited	july 2003	a340/$ 62	united kingdom
aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd	december 2003	$ 145	bangladesh
aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi	august 2003	$ 23	republic of georgia
medway power limited/aes medway operations limited	november 2003	a347/$ 78	united kingdom
aes oasis limited	december 2003	$ 150	pakistan/oman

Post-table text:
the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future .
however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet .
for any sales that happen in the future , there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries .
depending on which businesses are eventually sold , the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations .
furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve .
subsidiary restructuring during 2003 , we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses .
the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities .
businesses impacted include eletropaulo , tiete , uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile .
brazil eletropaulo .
aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998 , when the company was privatized .
in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it .
aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo , including both common and preferred shares , through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 ( 2018 2018bndes 2019 2019 ) , and its wholly-owned subsidiary , bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a .
( 2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019 ) , to aes 2019s subsidiaries , aes elpa s.a .
( 2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019 ) and aes transgas empreendimentos , s.a .
( 2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019 ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the sum?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what were the sales proceeds from cilcorp/medina valley in january 2003?
[Turn 2] what were the proceeds from aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart in january 2003?
[Turn 3] what is the sum?

Pre-table text:
transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses .
these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions .
the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows ; however , there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond .
asset sales during 2003 , we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries .
this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity .
the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003 .
sales proceeds project name date completed ( in millions ) location .

Table:
project name	date completed	sales proceeds ( in millions )	location
cilcorp/medina valley	january 2003	$ 495	united states
aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart	january 2003	$ 59	australia
mountainview	march 2003	$ 30	united states
kelvin	march 2003	$ 29	south africa
songas	april 2003	$ 94	tanzania
aes barry limited	july 2003	a340/$ 62	united kingdom
aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd	december 2003	$ 145	bangladesh
aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi	august 2003	$ 23	republic of georgia
medway power limited/aes medway operations limited	november 2003	a347/$ 78	united kingdom
aes oasis limited	december 2003	$ 150	pakistan/oman

Post-table text:
the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future .
however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet .
for any sales that happen in the future , there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries .
depending on which businesses are eventually sold , the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations .
furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve .
subsidiary restructuring during 2003 , we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses .
the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities .
businesses impacted include eletropaulo , tiete , uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile .
brazil eletropaulo .
aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998 , when the company was privatized .
in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it .
aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo , including both common and preferred shares , through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 ( 2018 2018bndes 2019 2019 ) , and its wholly-owned subsidiary , bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a .
( 2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019 ) , to aes 2019s subsidiaries , aes elpa s.a .
( 2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019 ) and aes transgas empreendimentos , s.a .
( 2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019 ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the sum including mountainview proceeds?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what were the sales proceeds from cilcorp/medina valley in january 2003?
[Turn 2] what were the proceeds from aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart in january 2003?
[Turn 3] what is the sum?
[Turn 4] what is the sum including mountainview proceeds?

Pre-table text:
transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses .
these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions .
the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows ; however , there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond .
asset sales during 2003 , we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries .
this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity .
the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003 .
sales proceeds project name date completed ( in millions ) location .

Table:
project name	date completed	sales proceeds ( in millions )	location
cilcorp/medina valley	january 2003	$ 495	united states
aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart	january 2003	$ 59	australia
mountainview	march 2003	$ 30	united states
kelvin	march 2003	$ 29	south africa
songas	april 2003	$ 94	tanzania
aes barry limited	july 2003	a340/$ 62	united kingdom
aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd	december 2003	$ 145	bangladesh
aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi	august 2003	$ 23	republic of georgia
medway power limited/aes medway operations limited	november 2003	a347/$ 78	united kingdom
aes oasis limited	december 2003	$ 150	pakistan/oman

Post-table text:
the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future .
however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet .
for any sales that happen in the future , there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries .
depending on which businesses are eventually sold , the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations .
furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve .
subsidiary restructuring during 2003 , we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses .
the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities .
businesses impacted include eletropaulo , tiete , uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile .
brazil eletropaulo .
aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998 , when the company was privatized .
in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it .
aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo , including both common and preferred shares , through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 ( 2018 2018bndes 2019 2019 ) , and its wholly-owned subsidiary , bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a .
( 2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019 ) , to aes 2019s subsidiaries , aes elpa s.a .
( 2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019 ) and aes transgas empreendimentos , s.a .
( 2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019 ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the proceeds from kelvin?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what were the sales proceeds from cilcorp/medina valley in january 2003?
[Turn 2] what were the proceeds from aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart in january 2003?
[Turn 3] what is the sum?
[Turn 4] what is the sum including mountainview proceeds?
[Turn 5] what is the proceeds from kelvin?

Pre-table text:
transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses .
these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions .
the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows ; however , there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond .
asset sales during 2003 , we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries .
this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity .
the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003 .
sales proceeds project name date completed ( in millions ) location .

Table:
project name	date completed	sales proceeds ( in millions )	location
cilcorp/medina valley	january 2003	$ 495	united states
aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart	january 2003	$ 59	australia
mountainview	march 2003	$ 30	united states
kelvin	march 2003	$ 29	south africa
songas	april 2003	$ 94	tanzania
aes barry limited	july 2003	a340/$ 62	united kingdom
aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd	december 2003	$ 145	bangladesh
aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi	august 2003	$ 23	republic of georgia
medway power limited/aes medway operations limited	november 2003	a347/$ 78	united kingdom
aes oasis limited	december 2003	$ 150	pakistan/oman

Post-table text:
the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future .
however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet .
for any sales that happen in the future , there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries .
depending on which businesses are eventually sold , the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations .
furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve .
subsidiary restructuring during 2003 , we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses .
the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities .
businesses impacted include eletropaulo , tiete , uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile .
brazil eletropaulo .
aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998 , when the company was privatized .
in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it .
aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo , including both common and preferred shares , through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 ( 2018 2018bndes 2019 2019 ) , and its wholly-owned subsidiary , bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a .
( 2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019 ) , to aes 2019s subsidiaries , aes elpa s.a .
( 2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019 ) and aes transgas empreendimentos , s.a .
( 2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019 ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the total sum from the 4 projects?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what were the sales proceeds from cilcorp/medina valley in january 2003?
[Turn 2] what were the proceeds from aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart in january 2003?
[Turn 3] what is the sum?
[Turn 4] what is the sum including mountainview proceeds?
[Turn 5] what is the proceeds from kelvin?
[Turn 6] what is the total sum from the 4 projects?

Pre-table text:
transaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses .
these skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions .
the company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows ; however , there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond .
asset sales during 2003 , we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries .
this initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity .
the following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003 .
sales proceeds project name date completed ( in millions ) location .

Table:
project name	date completed	sales proceeds ( in millions )	location
cilcorp/medina valley	january 2003	$ 495	united states
aes ecogen/aes mt . stuart	january 2003	$ 59	australia
mountainview	march 2003	$ 30	united states
kelvin	march 2003	$ 29	south africa
songas	april 2003	$ 94	tanzania
aes barry limited	july 2003	a340/$ 62	united kingdom
aes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd	december 2003	$ 145	bangladesh
aes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi	august 2003	$ 23	republic of georgia
medway power limited/aes medway operations limited	november 2003	a347/$ 78	united kingdom
aes oasis limited	december 2003	$ 150	pakistan/oman

Post-table text:
the company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future .
however given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet .
for any sales that happen in the future , there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries .
depending on which businesses are eventually sold , the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations .
furthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve .
subsidiary restructuring during 2003 , we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses .
the efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities .
businesses impacted include eletropaulo , tiete , uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile .
brazil eletropaulo .
aes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998 , when the company was privatized .
in february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it .
aes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo , including both common and preferred shares , through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 ( 2018 2018bndes 2019 2019 ) , and its wholly-owned subsidiary , bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a .
( 2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019 ) , to aes 2019s subsidiaries , aes elpa s.a .
( 2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019 ) and aes transgas empreendimentos , s.a .
( 2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019 ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the net change in the fair value of derivatives outstanding from 2007 to 2008?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net change in the fair value of derivatives outstanding from 2007 to 2008?

Pre-table text:
oneok partners 2019 commodity price risk is estimated as a hypothetical change in the price of ngls , crude oil and natural gas at december 31 , 2008 , excluding the effects of hedging and assuming normal operating conditions .
oneok partners 2019 condensate sales are based on the price of crude oil .
oneok partners estimates the following : 2022 a $ 0.01 per gallon decrease in the composite price of ngls would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.2 million ; 2022 a $ 1.00 per barrel decrease in the price of crude oil would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.0 million ; and 2022 a $ 0.10 per mmbtu decrease in the price of natural gas would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 0.6 million .
the above estimates of commodity price risk do not include any effects on demand for its services that might be caused by , or arise in conjunction with , price changes .
for example , a change in the gross processing spread may cause a change in the amount of ethane extracted from the natural gas stream , impacting gathering and processing margins , ngl exchange revenues , natural gas deliveries , and ngl volumes shipped and fractionated .
oneok partners is also exposed to commodity price risk primarily as a result of ngls in storage , the relative values of the various ngl products to each other , the relative value of ngls to natural gas and the relative value of ngl purchases at one location and sales at another location , known as basis risk .
oneok partners utilizes fixed-price physical forward contracts to reduce earnings volatility related to ngl price fluctuations .
oneok partners has not entered into any financial instruments with respect to its ngl marketing activities .
in addition , oneok partners is exposed to commodity price risk as its natural gas interstate and intrastate pipelines collect natural gas from its customers for operations or as part of its fee for services provided .
when the amount of natural gas consumed in operations by these pipelines differs from the amount provided by its customers , the pipelines must buy or sell natural gas , or store or use natural gas from inventory , which exposes oneok partners to commodity price risk .
at december 31 , 2008 , there were no hedges in place with respect to natural gas price risk from oneok partners 2019 natural gas pipeline business .
distribution our distribution segment uses derivative instruments to hedge the cost of anticipated natural gas purchases during the winter heating months to protect their customers from upward volatility in the market price of natural gas .
gains or losses associated with these derivative instruments are included in , and recoverable through , the monthly purchased gas cost mechanism .
energy services our energy services segment is exposed to commodity price risk , basis risk and price volatility arising from natural gas in storage , requirement contracts , asset management contracts and index-based purchases and sales of natural gas at various market locations .
we minimize the volatility of our exposure to commodity price risk through the use of derivative instruments , which , under certain circumstances , are designated as cash flow or fair value hedges .
we are also exposed to commodity price risk from fixed-price purchases and sales of natural gas , which we hedge with derivative instruments .
both the fixed-price purchases and sales and related derivatives are recorded at fair value .
fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities - the following table sets forth the fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities , excluding $ 21.0 million of net liabilities from derivative instruments declared as either fair value or cash flow hedges. .

Table:
	( thousands of dollars )
net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2007	$ 25171
derivatives reclassified or otherwise settled during the period	-55874 ( 55874 )
fair value of new derivatives entered into during the period	236772
other changes in fair value	52731
net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2008 ( a )	$ 258800

Post-table text:
( a ) - the maturiti es of derivatives are based on inject ion and withdrawal periods from april through m arc h , which is consistent with our business s trategy .
the maturities are as fol lows : $ 225.0 mi llion matures through march 2009 , $ 33.9 mi llion matures through march 2012 and $ ( 0.1 ) mil lion matures through march 2014 .
fair v alue com ponent of energy m arketing and risk m anagement assets and liabili ti es .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the value in 2007?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net change in the fair value of derivatives outstanding from 2007 to 2008?
[Turn 2] what was the value in 2007?

Pre-table text:
oneok partners 2019 commodity price risk is estimated as a hypothetical change in the price of ngls , crude oil and natural gas at december 31 , 2008 , excluding the effects of hedging and assuming normal operating conditions .
oneok partners 2019 condensate sales are based on the price of crude oil .
oneok partners estimates the following : 2022 a $ 0.01 per gallon decrease in the composite price of ngls would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.2 million ; 2022 a $ 1.00 per barrel decrease in the price of crude oil would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.0 million ; and 2022 a $ 0.10 per mmbtu decrease in the price of natural gas would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 0.6 million .
the above estimates of commodity price risk do not include any effects on demand for its services that might be caused by , or arise in conjunction with , price changes .
for example , a change in the gross processing spread may cause a change in the amount of ethane extracted from the natural gas stream , impacting gathering and processing margins , ngl exchange revenues , natural gas deliveries , and ngl volumes shipped and fractionated .
oneok partners is also exposed to commodity price risk primarily as a result of ngls in storage , the relative values of the various ngl products to each other , the relative value of ngls to natural gas and the relative value of ngl purchases at one location and sales at another location , known as basis risk .
oneok partners utilizes fixed-price physical forward contracts to reduce earnings volatility related to ngl price fluctuations .
oneok partners has not entered into any financial instruments with respect to its ngl marketing activities .
in addition , oneok partners is exposed to commodity price risk as its natural gas interstate and intrastate pipelines collect natural gas from its customers for operations or as part of its fee for services provided .
when the amount of natural gas consumed in operations by these pipelines differs from the amount provided by its customers , the pipelines must buy or sell natural gas , or store or use natural gas from inventory , which exposes oneok partners to commodity price risk .
at december 31 , 2008 , there were no hedges in place with respect to natural gas price risk from oneok partners 2019 natural gas pipeline business .
distribution our distribution segment uses derivative instruments to hedge the cost of anticipated natural gas purchases during the winter heating months to protect their customers from upward volatility in the market price of natural gas .
gains or losses associated with these derivative instruments are included in , and recoverable through , the monthly purchased gas cost mechanism .
energy services our energy services segment is exposed to commodity price risk , basis risk and price volatility arising from natural gas in storage , requirement contracts , asset management contracts and index-based purchases and sales of natural gas at various market locations .
we minimize the volatility of our exposure to commodity price risk through the use of derivative instruments , which , under certain circumstances , are designated as cash flow or fair value hedges .
we are also exposed to commodity price risk from fixed-price purchases and sales of natural gas , which we hedge with derivative instruments .
both the fixed-price purchases and sales and related derivatives are recorded at fair value .
fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities - the following table sets forth the fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities , excluding $ 21.0 million of net liabilities from derivative instruments declared as either fair value or cash flow hedges. .

Table:
	( thousands of dollars )
net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2007	$ 25171
derivatives reclassified or otherwise settled during the period	-55874 ( 55874 )
fair value of new derivatives entered into during the period	236772
other changes in fair value	52731
net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2008 ( a )	$ 258800

Post-table text:
( a ) - the maturiti es of derivatives are based on inject ion and withdrawal periods from april through m arc h , which is consistent with our business s trategy .
the maturities are as fol lows : $ 225.0 mi llion matures through march 2009 , $ 33.9 mi llion matures through march 2012 and $ ( 0.1 ) mil lion matures through march 2014 .
fair v alue com ponent of energy m arketing and risk m anagement assets and liabili ti es .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the net change over the 2007 value?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net change in the fair value of derivatives outstanding from 2007 to 2008?
[Turn 2] what was the value in 2007?
[Turn 3] what is the net change over the 2007 value?

Pre-table text:
oneok partners 2019 commodity price risk is estimated as a hypothetical change in the price of ngls , crude oil and natural gas at december 31 , 2008 , excluding the effects of hedging and assuming normal operating conditions .
oneok partners 2019 condensate sales are based on the price of crude oil .
oneok partners estimates the following : 2022 a $ 0.01 per gallon decrease in the composite price of ngls would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.2 million ; 2022 a $ 1.00 per barrel decrease in the price of crude oil would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.0 million ; and 2022 a $ 0.10 per mmbtu decrease in the price of natural gas would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 0.6 million .
the above estimates of commodity price risk do not include any effects on demand for its services that might be caused by , or arise in conjunction with , price changes .
for example , a change in the gross processing spread may cause a change in the amount of ethane extracted from the natural gas stream , impacting gathering and processing margins , ngl exchange revenues , natural gas deliveries , and ngl volumes shipped and fractionated .
oneok partners is also exposed to commodity price risk primarily as a result of ngls in storage , the relative values of the various ngl products to each other , the relative value of ngls to natural gas and the relative value of ngl purchases at one location and sales at another location , known as basis risk .
oneok partners utilizes fixed-price physical forward contracts to reduce earnings volatility related to ngl price fluctuations .
oneok partners has not entered into any financial instruments with respect to its ngl marketing activities .
in addition , oneok partners is exposed to commodity price risk as its natural gas interstate and intrastate pipelines collect natural gas from its customers for operations or as part of its fee for services provided .
when the amount of natural gas consumed in operations by these pipelines differs from the amount provided by its customers , the pipelines must buy or sell natural gas , or store or use natural gas from inventory , which exposes oneok partners to commodity price risk .
at december 31 , 2008 , there were no hedges in place with respect to natural gas price risk from oneok partners 2019 natural gas pipeline business .
distribution our distribution segment uses derivative instruments to hedge the cost of anticipated natural gas purchases during the winter heating months to protect their customers from upward volatility in the market price of natural gas .
gains or losses associated with these derivative instruments are included in , and recoverable through , the monthly purchased gas cost mechanism .
energy services our energy services segment is exposed to commodity price risk , basis risk and price volatility arising from natural gas in storage , requirement contracts , asset management contracts and index-based purchases and sales of natural gas at various market locations .
we minimize the volatility of our exposure to commodity price risk through the use of derivative instruments , which , under certain circumstances , are designated as cash flow or fair value hedges .
we are also exposed to commodity price risk from fixed-price purchases and sales of natural gas , which we hedge with derivative instruments .
both the fixed-price purchases and sales and related derivatives are recorded at fair value .
fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities - the following table sets forth the fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities , excluding $ 21.0 million of net liabilities from derivative instruments declared as either fair value or cash flow hedges. .

Table:
	( thousands of dollars )
net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2007	$ 25171
derivatives reclassified or otherwise settled during the period	-55874 ( 55874 )
fair value of new derivatives entered into during the period	236772
other changes in fair value	52731
net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2008 ( a )	$ 258800

Post-table text:
( a ) - the maturiti es of derivatives are based on inject ion and withdrawal periods from april through m arc h , which is consistent with our business s trategy .
the maturities are as fol lows : $ 225.0 mi llion matures through march 2009 , $ 33.9 mi llion matures through march 2012 and $ ( 0.1 ) mil lion matures through march 2014 .
fair v alue com ponent of energy m arketing and risk m anagement assets and liabili ti es .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the net pension cost in 2018?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net pension cost in 2018?

Pre-table text:
note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations .
postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material .
the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 .
effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s .
pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

Table:
( millions of dollars )	pension plans 2018	pension plans 2017	pension plans 2016
service cost	$ 136	$ 110	$ 81
interest cost	90	61	72
expected return on plan assets	-154 ( 154 )	-112 ( 112 )	-109 ( 109 )
amortization of prior service credit	-13 ( 13 )	-14 ( 14 )	-15 ( 15 )
amortization of loss	78	92	77
settlements	2	2014	7
net pension cost	$ 137	$ 138	$ 113
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans	$ 34	$ 43	$ 35

Post-table text:
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods .
the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s .
supplemental pension plan .
the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and in 2017?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net pension cost in 2018?
[Turn 2] and in 2017?

Pre-table text:
note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations .
postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material .
the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 .
effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s .
pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

Table:
( millions of dollars )	pension plans 2018	pension plans 2017	pension plans 2016
service cost	$ 136	$ 110	$ 81
interest cost	90	61	72
expected return on plan assets	-154 ( 154 )	-112 ( 112 )	-109 ( 109 )
amortization of prior service credit	-13 ( 13 )	-14 ( 14 )	-15 ( 15 )
amortization of loss	78	92	77
settlements	2	2014	7
net pension cost	$ 137	$ 138	$ 113
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans	$ 34	$ 43	$ 35

Post-table text:
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods .
the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s .
supplemental pension plan .
the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
combined, what was the total for these two years?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net pension cost in 2018?
[Turn 2] and in 2017?
[Turn 3] combined, what was the total for these two years?

Pre-table text:
note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations .
postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material .
the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 .
effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s .
pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

Table:
( millions of dollars )	pension plans 2018	pension plans 2017	pension plans 2016
service cost	$ 136	$ 110	$ 81
interest cost	90	61	72
expected return on plan assets	-154 ( 154 )	-112 ( 112 )	-109 ( 109 )
amortization of prior service credit	-13 ( 13 )	-14 ( 14 )	-15 ( 15 )
amortization of loss	78	92	77
settlements	2	2014	7
net pension cost	$ 137	$ 138	$ 113
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans	$ 34	$ 43	$ 35

Post-table text:
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods .
the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s .
supplemental pension plan .
the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and in 2016?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net pension cost in 2018?
[Turn 2] and in 2017?
[Turn 3] combined, what was the total for these two years?
[Turn 4] and in 2016?

Pre-table text:
note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations .
postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material .
the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 .
effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s .
pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

Table:
( millions of dollars )	pension plans 2018	pension plans 2017	pension plans 2016
service cost	$ 136	$ 110	$ 81
interest cost	90	61	72
expected return on plan assets	-154 ( 154 )	-112 ( 112 )	-109 ( 109 )
amortization of prior service credit	-13 ( 13 )	-14 ( 14 )	-15 ( 15 )
amortization of loss	78	92	77
settlements	2	2014	7
net pension cost	$ 137	$ 138	$ 113
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans	$ 34	$ 43	$ 35

Post-table text:
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods .
the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s .
supplemental pension plan .
the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.