[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the difference between the fair and the carrying value of all notes?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the difference between the fair and the carrying value of all notes?

Pre-table text:
long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2013 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value .

Table:
( in millions )	maturity amount	unamortized discount	carrying value	fair value
3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2014	$ 1000	$ 2014	$ 1000	$ 1029
1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015	750	2014	750	759
6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017	700	-2 ( 2 )	698	812
5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019	1000	-2 ( 2 )	998	1140
4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021	750	-3 ( 3 )	747	799
3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022	750	-4 ( 4 )	746	745
total long-term borrowings	$ 4950	$ -11 ( 11 )	$ 4939	$ 5284

Post-table text:
long-term borrowings at december 31 , 2012 had a carrying value of $ 5.687 billion and a fair value of $ 6.275 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2012 .
2015 and 2022 notes .
in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .
net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .
interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .
the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .
the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
2013 and 2021 notes .
in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .
net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .
( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) .
interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year .
the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
the 2021 notes were issued at a discount of $ 4 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs for the $ 1.5 billion note issuances , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
in may 2011 , in conjunction with the issuance of the 2013 floating rate notes , the company entered into a $ 750 million notional interest rate swap maturing in 2013 to hedge the future cash flows of its obligation at a fixed rate of 1.03% ( 1.03 % ) .
during the second quarter of 2013 , the interest rate swap matured and the 2013 floating rate notes were fully repaid .
2012 , 2014 and 2019 notes .
in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2014 and 2019 , respectively .
net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors ( 201cbgi 201d ) from barclays on december 1 , 2009 ( the 201cbgi transaction 201d ) , and for general corporate purposes .
interest on the 2014 notes and 2019 notes of approximately $ 35 million and $ 50 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year .
these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
these notes were issued collectively at a discount of $ 5 million , which is being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 13 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of these notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
2017 notes .
in september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) .
a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund of funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes .
interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year .
the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was that carrying value for only the notes due in 2014?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the difference between the fair and the carrying value of all notes?
[Turn 2] and what was that carrying value for only the notes due in 2014?

Pre-table text:
long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2013 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value .

Table:
( in millions )	maturity amount	unamortized discount	carrying value	fair value
3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2014	$ 1000	$ 2014	$ 1000	$ 1029
1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015	750	2014	750	759
6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017	700	-2 ( 2 )	698	812
5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019	1000	-2 ( 2 )	998	1140
4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021	750	-3 ( 3 )	747	799
3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022	750	-4 ( 4 )	746	745
total long-term borrowings	$ 4950	$ -11 ( 11 )	$ 4939	$ 5284

Post-table text:
long-term borrowings at december 31 , 2012 had a carrying value of $ 5.687 billion and a fair value of $ 6.275 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2012 .
2015 and 2022 notes .
in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .
net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .
interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .
the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .
the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
2013 and 2021 notes .
in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .
net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .
( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) .
interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year .
the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
the 2021 notes were issued at a discount of $ 4 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs for the $ 1.5 billion note issuances , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
in may 2011 , in conjunction with the issuance of the 2013 floating rate notes , the company entered into a $ 750 million notional interest rate swap maturing in 2013 to hedge the future cash flows of its obligation at a fixed rate of 1.03% ( 1.03 % ) .
during the second quarter of 2013 , the interest rate swap matured and the 2013 floating rate notes were fully repaid .
2012 , 2014 and 2019 notes .
in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2014 and 2019 , respectively .
net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors ( 201cbgi 201d ) from barclays on december 1 , 2009 ( the 201cbgi transaction 201d ) , and for general corporate purposes .
interest on the 2014 notes and 2019 notes of approximately $ 35 million and $ 50 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year .
these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
these notes were issued collectively at a discount of $ 5 million , which is being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 13 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of these notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
2017 notes .
in september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) .
a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund of funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes .
interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year .
the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was it for 2015?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the difference between the fair and the carrying value of all notes?
[Turn 2] and what was that carrying value for only the notes due in 2014?
[Turn 3] what was it for 2015?

Pre-table text:
long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2013 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value .

Table:
( in millions )	maturity amount	unamortized discount	carrying value	fair value
3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2014	$ 1000	$ 2014	$ 1000	$ 1029
1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015	750	2014	750	759
6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017	700	-2 ( 2 )	698	812
5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019	1000	-2 ( 2 )	998	1140
4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021	750	-3 ( 3 )	747	799
3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022	750	-4 ( 4 )	746	745
total long-term borrowings	$ 4950	$ -11 ( 11 )	$ 4939	$ 5284

Post-table text:
long-term borrowings at december 31 , 2012 had a carrying value of $ 5.687 billion and a fair value of $ 6.275 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2012 .
2015 and 2022 notes .
in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .
net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .
interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .
the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .
the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
2013 and 2021 notes .
in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .
net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .
( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) .
interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year .
the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
the 2021 notes were issued at a discount of $ 4 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs for the $ 1.5 billion note issuances , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
in may 2011 , in conjunction with the issuance of the 2013 floating rate notes , the company entered into a $ 750 million notional interest rate swap maturing in 2013 to hedge the future cash flows of its obligation at a fixed rate of 1.03% ( 1.03 % ) .
during the second quarter of 2013 , the interest rate swap matured and the 2013 floating rate notes were fully repaid .
2012 , 2014 and 2019 notes .
in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2014 and 2019 , respectively .
net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors ( 201cbgi 201d ) from barclays on december 1 , 2009 ( the 201cbgi transaction 201d ) , and for general corporate purposes .
interest on the 2014 notes and 2019 notes of approximately $ 35 million and $ 50 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year .
these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
these notes were issued collectively at a discount of $ 5 million , which is being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 13 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of these notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
2017 notes .
in september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) .
a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund of funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes .
interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year .
the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was, then, the total carrying value for both years?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the difference between the fair and the carrying value of all notes?
[Turn 2] and what was that carrying value for only the notes due in 2014?
[Turn 3] what was it for 2015?
[Turn 4] what was, then, the total carrying value for both years?

Pre-table text:
long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2013 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value .

Table:
( in millions )	maturity amount	unamortized discount	carrying value	fair value
3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2014	$ 1000	$ 2014	$ 1000	$ 1029
1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015	750	2014	750	759
6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017	700	-2 ( 2 )	698	812
5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019	1000	-2 ( 2 )	998	1140
4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021	750	-3 ( 3 )	747	799
3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022	750	-4 ( 4 )	746	745
total long-term borrowings	$ 4950	$ -11 ( 11 )	$ 4939	$ 5284

Post-table text:
long-term borrowings at december 31 , 2012 had a carrying value of $ 5.687 billion and a fair value of $ 6.275 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2012 .
2015 and 2022 notes .
in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .
net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .
interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .
the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .
the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
2013 and 2021 notes .
in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .
net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .
( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) .
interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year .
the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
the 2021 notes were issued at a discount of $ 4 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs for the $ 1.5 billion note issuances , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
in may 2011 , in conjunction with the issuance of the 2013 floating rate notes , the company entered into a $ 750 million notional interest rate swap maturing in 2013 to hedge the future cash flows of its obligation at a fixed rate of 1.03% ( 1.03 % ) .
during the second quarter of 2013 , the interest rate swap matured and the 2013 floating rate notes were fully repaid .
2012 , 2014 and 2019 notes .
in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2014 and 2019 , respectively .
net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors ( 201cbgi 201d ) from barclays on december 1 , 2009 ( the 201cbgi transaction 201d ) , and for general corporate purposes .
interest on the 2014 notes and 2019 notes of approximately $ 35 million and $ 50 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year .
these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
these notes were issued collectively at a discount of $ 5 million , which is being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 13 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of these notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
2017 notes .
in september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) .
a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund of funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes .
interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year .
the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and including the 2017 notes, what becomes this total?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the difference between the fair and the carrying value of all notes?
[Turn 2] and what was that carrying value for only the notes due in 2014?
[Turn 3] what was it for 2015?
[Turn 4] what was, then, the total carrying value for both years?
[Turn 5] and including the 2017 notes, what becomes this total?

Pre-table text:
long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2013 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value .

Table:
( in millions )	maturity amount	unamortized discount	carrying value	fair value
3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2014	$ 1000	$ 2014	$ 1000	$ 1029
1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015	750	2014	750	759
6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017	700	-2 ( 2 )	698	812
5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019	1000	-2 ( 2 )	998	1140
4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021	750	-3 ( 3 )	747	799
3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022	750	-4 ( 4 )	746	745
total long-term borrowings	$ 4950	$ -11 ( 11 )	$ 4939	$ 5284

Post-table text:
long-term borrowings at december 31 , 2012 had a carrying value of $ 5.687 billion and a fair value of $ 6.275 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2012 .
2015 and 2022 notes .
in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .
net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .
interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .
the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .
the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
2013 and 2021 notes .
in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .
net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .
( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) .
interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year .
the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
the 2021 notes were issued at a discount of $ 4 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs for the $ 1.5 billion note issuances , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
in may 2011 , in conjunction with the issuance of the 2013 floating rate notes , the company entered into a $ 750 million notional interest rate swap maturing in 2013 to hedge the future cash flows of its obligation at a fixed rate of 1.03% ( 1.03 % ) .
during the second quarter of 2013 , the interest rate swap matured and the 2013 floating rate notes were fully repaid .
2012 , 2014 and 2019 notes .
in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2014 and 2019 , respectively .
net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors ( 201cbgi 201d ) from barclays on december 1 , 2009 ( the 201cbgi transaction 201d ) , and for general corporate purposes .
interest on the 2014 notes and 2019 notes of approximately $ 35 million and $ 50 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year .
these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
these notes were issued collectively at a discount of $ 5 million , which is being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 13 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of these notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
2017 notes .
in september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) .
a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund of funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes .
interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year .
the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the price of pmi in 2014?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the price of pmi in 2014?

Pre-table text:
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .
the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .
date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

Table:
date	pmi	pmi peer group ( 1 )	s&p 500 index
december 31 2013	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
december 31 2014	$ 97.90	$ 107.80	$ 113.70
december 31 2015	$ 111.00	$ 116.80	$ 115.30
december 31 2016	$ 120.50	$ 118.40	$ 129.00
december 31 2017	$ 144.50	$ 140.50	$ 157.20
december 31 2018	$ 96.50	$ 127.70	$ 150.30

Post-table text:
( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year .
the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .
the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .
as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .
note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the price of pmi in 2014 less 100?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the price of pmi in 2014?
[Turn 2] what is the price of pmi in 2014 less 100?

Pre-table text:
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .
the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .
date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

Table:
date	pmi	pmi peer group ( 1 )	s&p 500 index
december 31 2013	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
december 31 2014	$ 97.90	$ 107.80	$ 113.70
december 31 2015	$ 111.00	$ 116.80	$ 115.30
december 31 2016	$ 120.50	$ 118.40	$ 129.00
december 31 2017	$ 144.50	$ 140.50	$ 157.20
december 31 2018	$ 96.50	$ 127.70	$ 150.30

Post-table text:
( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year .
the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .
the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .
as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .
note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the percent change?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the price of pmi in 2014?
[Turn 2] what is the price of pmi in 2014 less 100?
[Turn 3] what is the percent change?

Pre-table text:
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .
the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .
date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

Table:
date	pmi	pmi peer group ( 1 )	s&p 500 index
december 31 2013	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
december 31 2014	$ 97.90	$ 107.80	$ 113.70
december 31 2015	$ 111.00	$ 116.80	$ 115.30
december 31 2016	$ 120.50	$ 118.40	$ 129.00
december 31 2017	$ 144.50	$ 140.50	$ 157.20
december 31 2018	$ 96.50	$ 127.70	$ 150.30

Post-table text:
( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year .
the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .
the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .
as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .
note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the impact in mmboe resulting from an increase in drilling programs in the us resource plays and an increase in discontinued operations due to technical reevaluation and lower royalty percentages related to lower realized prices?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the impact in mmboe resulting from an increase in drilling programs in the us resource plays and an increase in discontinued operations due to technical reevaluation and lower royalty percentages related to lower realized prices?

Pre-table text:
supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) 2017 proved reserves decreased by 647 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 49 mmboe primarily due to the acceleration of higher economic wells in the bakken into the 5-year plan resulting in an increase of 44 mmboe , with the remainder being due to revisions across the business .
2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 116 mmboe primarily due to an increase of 97 mmboe associated with the expansion of proved areas and wells to sales from unproved categories in oklahoma .
2022 purchases of reserves in place : increased by 28 mmboe from acquisitions of assets in the northern delaware basin in new mexico .
2022 production : decreased by 145 mmboe .
2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 695 mmboe including 685 mmboe associated with the sale of our canadian business and 10 mmboe associated with divestitures of certain conventional assets in oklahoma and colorado .
see item 8 .
financial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding these dispositions .
2016 proved reserves decreased by 67 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 63 mmboe primarily due to an increase of 151 mmboe associated with the acceleration of higher economic wells in the u.s .
resource plays into the 5-year plan and a decrease of 64 mmboe due to u.s .
technical revisions .
2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 60 mmboe primarily associated with the expansion of proved areas and new wells to sales from unproven categories in oklahoma .
2022 purchases of reserves in place : increased by 34 mmboe from acquisition of stack assets in oklahoma .
2022 production : decreased by 144 mmboe .
2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 84 mmboe associated with the divestitures of certain wyoming and gulf of mexico assets .
2015 proved reserves decreased by 35 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : decreased by 2 mmboe primarily resulting from an increase of 105 mmboe associated with drilling programs in u.s .
resource plays and an increase of 67 mmboe in discontinued operations due to technical reevaluation and lower royalty percentages related to lower realized prices , offset by a decrease of 173 mmboe which was largely due to reductions to our capital development program and adherence to the sec 5-year rule .
2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by140 mmboe as a result of drilling programs in our u.s .
resource plays .
2022 production : decreased by 157 mmboe .
2022 sales of reserves in place : u.s .
conventional assets sales contributed to a decrease of 18 mmboe .
changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2017 , 546 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , a decrease of 6 mmboe from december 31 , 2016 .
the following table shows changes in proved undeveloped reserves for 2017 : ( mmboe ) .

Table:
beginning of year	552
revisions of previous estimates	5
improved recovery	2014
purchases of reserves in place	15
extensions discoveries and other additions	57
dispositions	2014
transfers to proved developed	-83 ( 83 )
end of year	546

Post-table text:
revisions of prior estimates .
revisions of prior estimates increased 5 mmboe during 2017 , primarily due to a 44 mmboe increase in the bakken from an acceleration of higher economic wells into the 5-year plan , offset by a decrease of 40 mmboe in oklahoma due to the removal of less economic wells from the 5-year plan .
extensions , discoveries and other additions .
increased 57 mmboe through expansion of proved areas in oklahoma. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the purchases of reserves in place in 2016?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the impact in mmboe resulting from an increase in drilling programs in the us resource plays and an increase in discontinued operations due to technical reevaluation and lower royalty percentages related to lower realized prices?
[Turn 2] what was the purchases of reserves in place in 2016?

Pre-table text:
supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) 2017 proved reserves decreased by 647 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 49 mmboe primarily due to the acceleration of higher economic wells in the bakken into the 5-year plan resulting in an increase of 44 mmboe , with the remainder being due to revisions across the business .
2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 116 mmboe primarily due to an increase of 97 mmboe associated with the expansion of proved areas and wells to sales from unproved categories in oklahoma .
2022 purchases of reserves in place : increased by 28 mmboe from acquisitions of assets in the northern delaware basin in new mexico .
2022 production : decreased by 145 mmboe .
2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 695 mmboe including 685 mmboe associated with the sale of our canadian business and 10 mmboe associated with divestitures of certain conventional assets in oklahoma and colorado .
see item 8 .
financial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding these dispositions .
2016 proved reserves decreased by 67 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 63 mmboe primarily due to an increase of 151 mmboe associated with the acceleration of higher economic wells in the u.s .
resource plays into the 5-year plan and a decrease of 64 mmboe due to u.s .
technical revisions .
2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 60 mmboe primarily associated with the expansion of proved areas and new wells to sales from unproven categories in oklahoma .
2022 purchases of reserves in place : increased by 34 mmboe from acquisition of stack assets in oklahoma .
2022 production : decreased by 144 mmboe .
2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 84 mmboe associated with the divestitures of certain wyoming and gulf of mexico assets .
2015 proved reserves decreased by 35 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : decreased by 2 mmboe primarily resulting from an increase of 105 mmboe associated with drilling programs in u.s .
resource plays and an increase of 67 mmboe in discontinued operations due to technical reevaluation and lower royalty percentages related to lower realized prices , offset by a decrease of 173 mmboe which was largely due to reductions to our capital development program and adherence to the sec 5-year rule .
2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by140 mmboe as a result of drilling programs in our u.s .
resource plays .
2022 production : decreased by 157 mmboe .
2022 sales of reserves in place : u.s .
conventional assets sales contributed to a decrease of 18 mmboe .
changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2017 , 546 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , a decrease of 6 mmboe from december 31 , 2016 .
the following table shows changes in proved undeveloped reserves for 2017 : ( mmboe ) .

Table:
beginning of year	552
revisions of previous estimates	5
improved recovery	2014
purchases of reserves in place	15
extensions discoveries and other additions	57
dispositions	2014
transfers to proved developed	-83 ( 83 )
end of year	546

Post-table text:
revisions of prior estimates .
revisions of prior estimates increased 5 mmboe during 2017 , primarily due to a 44 mmboe increase in the bakken from an acceleration of higher economic wells into the 5-year plan , offset by a decrease of 40 mmboe in oklahoma due to the removal of less economic wells from the 5-year plan .
extensions , discoveries and other additions .
increased 57 mmboe through expansion of proved areas in oklahoma. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the change in capital gain distributions from 2008 to 2009?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in capital gain distributions from 2008 to 2009?

Pre-table text:
investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 44 million , or 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , to $ 477.8 million in 2009 .
average assets in these portfolios were $ 129.5 billion during 2009 , down $ 12.6 billion or 9% ( 9 % ) from 2008 .
other investment portfolio assets under management increased $ 46.7 billion during 2009 , including $ 36.5 billion in market gains and income and $ 10.2 billion of net inflows , primarily from institutional investors .
net inflows include $ 1.3 billion transferred from the stock and blended asset mutual funds during 2009 .
administrative fees decreased $ 35 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 319 million in 2009 .
this change includes a $ 4 million decrease in 12b-1 distribution and service fees recognized on lower average assets under management in the advisor and r classes of our sponsored mutual funds and a $ 31 million reduction in our mutual fund servicing revenue , which is primarily attributable to our cost reduction efforts in the mutual fund and retirement plan servicing functions .
changes in administrative fees are generally offset by similar changes in related operating expenses that are incurred to provide services to the funds and their investors .
our largest expense , compensation and related costs , decreased $ 42 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , from 2008 to $ 773 million in 2009 .
the largest part of this decrease is attributable to a $ 19 million reduction in our annual bonus program .
reductions in the use of outside contractors lowered 2009 costs $ 14 million with the remainder of the cost savings primarily attributable to the workforce reduction and lower employee benefits and other employment expenses .
average headcount in 2009 was down 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) from 2008 due to attrition , retirements and our workforce reduction in april 2009 .
advertising and promotion expenditures were down $ 31 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) , versus 2008 due to our decision to reduce spending in response to lower investor activity in the 2009 market environment .
depreciation expense and other occupancy and facility costs together increased $ 4 million , or 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) compared to 2008 , as we moderated or delayed our capital spending and facility growth plans .
other operating expenses decreased $ 33 million , or 18% ( 18 % ) from 2008 , including a decline of $ 4 million in distribution and service expenses recognized on lower average assets under management in our advisor and r classes of mutual fund shares that are sourced from financial intermediaries .
our cost control efforts resulted in the remaining expense reductions , including lower professional fees and travel and related costs .
our non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 .
the improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 .
the following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the two years ended december 31 , 2009. .

Table:
	2008	2009	change
other than temporary impairments recognized	$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )	$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )	$ 55.2
capital gain distributions received	5.6	2.0	-3.6 ( 3.6 )
net gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions	-4.5 ( 4.5 )	7.4	11.9
net loss recognized on fund holdings	$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )	$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )	$ 63.5

Post-table text:
lower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments .
the 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 .
our 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) .
c a p i t a l r e s o u r c e s a n d l i q u i d i t y .
during 2010 , stockholders 2019 equity increased from $ 2.9 billion to $ 3.3 billion .
we repurchased nearly 5.0 million common shares for $ 240.0 million in 2010 .
tangible book value is $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2010 , and our cash and cash equivalents and our mutual fund investment holdings total more than $ 1.5 billion .
given the availability of these financial resources , we do not maintain an available external source of liquidity .
t .
rowe price group annual report 2010 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what were those capital gain distributions in 2008?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in capital gain distributions from 2008 to 2009?
[Turn 2] and what were those capital gain distributions in 2008?

Pre-table text:
investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 44 million , or 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , to $ 477.8 million in 2009 .
average assets in these portfolios were $ 129.5 billion during 2009 , down $ 12.6 billion or 9% ( 9 % ) from 2008 .
other investment portfolio assets under management increased $ 46.7 billion during 2009 , including $ 36.5 billion in market gains and income and $ 10.2 billion of net inflows , primarily from institutional investors .
net inflows include $ 1.3 billion transferred from the stock and blended asset mutual funds during 2009 .
administrative fees decreased $ 35 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 319 million in 2009 .
this change includes a $ 4 million decrease in 12b-1 distribution and service fees recognized on lower average assets under management in the advisor and r classes of our sponsored mutual funds and a $ 31 million reduction in our mutual fund servicing revenue , which is primarily attributable to our cost reduction efforts in the mutual fund and retirement plan servicing functions .
changes in administrative fees are generally offset by similar changes in related operating expenses that are incurred to provide services to the funds and their investors .
our largest expense , compensation and related costs , decreased $ 42 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , from 2008 to $ 773 million in 2009 .
the largest part of this decrease is attributable to a $ 19 million reduction in our annual bonus program .
reductions in the use of outside contractors lowered 2009 costs $ 14 million with the remainder of the cost savings primarily attributable to the workforce reduction and lower employee benefits and other employment expenses .
average headcount in 2009 was down 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) from 2008 due to attrition , retirements and our workforce reduction in april 2009 .
advertising and promotion expenditures were down $ 31 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) , versus 2008 due to our decision to reduce spending in response to lower investor activity in the 2009 market environment .
depreciation expense and other occupancy and facility costs together increased $ 4 million , or 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) compared to 2008 , as we moderated or delayed our capital spending and facility growth plans .
other operating expenses decreased $ 33 million , or 18% ( 18 % ) from 2008 , including a decline of $ 4 million in distribution and service expenses recognized on lower average assets under management in our advisor and r classes of mutual fund shares that are sourced from financial intermediaries .
our cost control efforts resulted in the remaining expense reductions , including lower professional fees and travel and related costs .
our non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 .
the improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 .
the following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the two years ended december 31 , 2009. .

Table:
	2008	2009	change
other than temporary impairments recognized	$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )	$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )	$ 55.2
capital gain distributions received	5.6	2.0	-3.6 ( 3.6 )
net gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions	-4.5 ( 4.5 )	7.4	11.9
net loss recognized on fund holdings	$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )	$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )	$ 63.5

Post-table text:
lower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments .
the 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 .
our 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) .
c a p i t a l r e s o u r c e s a n d l i q u i d i t y .
during 2010 , stockholders 2019 equity increased from $ 2.9 billion to $ 3.3 billion .
we repurchased nearly 5.0 million common shares for $ 240.0 million in 2010 .
tangible book value is $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2010 , and our cash and cash equivalents and our mutual fund investment holdings total more than $ 1.5 billion .
given the availability of these financial resources , we do not maintain an available external source of liquidity .
t .
rowe price group annual report 2010 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
how much, then, does that change represent in relation to these 2008 distributions, in percentage?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in capital gain distributions from 2008 to 2009?
[Turn 2] and what were those capital gain distributions in 2008?
[Turn 3] how much, then, does that change represent in relation to these 2008 distributions, in percentage?

Pre-table text:
investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 44 million , or 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , to $ 477.8 million in 2009 .
average assets in these portfolios were $ 129.5 billion during 2009 , down $ 12.6 billion or 9% ( 9 % ) from 2008 .
other investment portfolio assets under management increased $ 46.7 billion during 2009 , including $ 36.5 billion in market gains and income and $ 10.2 billion of net inflows , primarily from institutional investors .
net inflows include $ 1.3 billion transferred from the stock and blended asset mutual funds during 2009 .
administrative fees decreased $ 35 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 319 million in 2009 .
this change includes a $ 4 million decrease in 12b-1 distribution and service fees recognized on lower average assets under management in the advisor and r classes of our sponsored mutual funds and a $ 31 million reduction in our mutual fund servicing revenue , which is primarily attributable to our cost reduction efforts in the mutual fund and retirement plan servicing functions .
changes in administrative fees are generally offset by similar changes in related operating expenses that are incurred to provide services to the funds and their investors .
our largest expense , compensation and related costs , decreased $ 42 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , from 2008 to $ 773 million in 2009 .
the largest part of this decrease is attributable to a $ 19 million reduction in our annual bonus program .
reductions in the use of outside contractors lowered 2009 costs $ 14 million with the remainder of the cost savings primarily attributable to the workforce reduction and lower employee benefits and other employment expenses .
average headcount in 2009 was down 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) from 2008 due to attrition , retirements and our workforce reduction in april 2009 .
advertising and promotion expenditures were down $ 31 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) , versus 2008 due to our decision to reduce spending in response to lower investor activity in the 2009 market environment .
depreciation expense and other occupancy and facility costs together increased $ 4 million , or 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) compared to 2008 , as we moderated or delayed our capital spending and facility growth plans .
other operating expenses decreased $ 33 million , or 18% ( 18 % ) from 2008 , including a decline of $ 4 million in distribution and service expenses recognized on lower average assets under management in our advisor and r classes of mutual fund shares that are sourced from financial intermediaries .
our cost control efforts resulted in the remaining expense reductions , including lower professional fees and travel and related costs .
our non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 .
the improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 .
the following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the two years ended december 31 , 2009. .

Table:
	2008	2009	change
other than temporary impairments recognized	$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )	$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )	$ 55.2
capital gain distributions received	5.6	2.0	-3.6 ( 3.6 )
net gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions	-4.5 ( 4.5 )	7.4	11.9
net loss recognized on fund holdings	$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )	$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )	$ 63.5

Post-table text:
lower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments .
the 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 .
our 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) .
c a p i t a l r e s o u r c e s a n d l i q u i d i t y .
during 2010 , stockholders 2019 equity increased from $ 2.9 billion to $ 3.3 billion .
we repurchased nearly 5.0 million common shares for $ 240.0 million in 2010 .
tangible book value is $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2010 , and our cash and cash equivalents and our mutual fund investment holdings total more than $ 1.5 billion .
given the availability of these financial resources , we do not maintain an available external source of liquidity .
t .
rowe price group annual report 2010 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the difference in net revenue between 2015 and 2016?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the difference in net revenue between 2015 and 2016?

Pre-table text:
amortized over a nine-year period beginning december 2015 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather during the unbilled period and an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales .
the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry , and increased demand from new customers , primarily in the industrial gases industry .
the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc .
the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike .
see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .
included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . a0 see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .
entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2015 net revenue	$ 1666
nuclear realized price changes	-149 ( 149 )
rhode island state energy center	-44 ( 44 )
nuclear volume	-36 ( 36 )
fitzpatrick reimbursement agreement	41
nuclear fuel expenses	68
other	-4 ( 4 )
2016 net revenue	$ 1542

Post-table text:
as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 124 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices and lower capacity prices , the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa , and vermont yankee capacity revenue .
the effect of the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa and vermont yankee capacity revenue on the net revenue variance from 2015 to 2016 is minimal ; 2022 the sale of the rhode island state energy center in december 2015 .
see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale ; and 2022 lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more refueling outage days in 2016 as compared to 2015 and larger exercise of resupply options in 2016 as compared to 2015 .
see 201cnuclear matters - indian point 201d below for discussion of the extended indian point 2 outage in the second quarter entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and the specific value for 2016 again?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the difference in net revenue between 2015 and 2016?
[Turn 2] and the specific value for 2016 again?

Pre-table text:
amortized over a nine-year period beginning december 2015 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather during the unbilled period and an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales .
the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry , and increased demand from new customers , primarily in the industrial gases industry .
the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc .
the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike .
see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .
included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . a0 see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .
entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2015 net revenue	$ 1666
nuclear realized price changes	-149 ( 149 )
rhode island state energy center	-44 ( 44 )
nuclear volume	-36 ( 36 )
fitzpatrick reimbursement agreement	41
nuclear fuel expenses	68
other	-4 ( 4 )
2016 net revenue	$ 1542

Post-table text:
as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 124 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices and lower capacity prices , the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa , and vermont yankee capacity revenue .
the effect of the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa and vermont yankee capacity revenue on the net revenue variance from 2015 to 2016 is minimal ; 2022 the sale of the rhode island state energy center in december 2015 .
see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale ; and 2022 lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more refueling outage days in 2016 as compared to 2015 and larger exercise of resupply options in 2016 as compared to 2015 .
see 201cnuclear matters - indian point 201d below for discussion of the extended indian point 2 outage in the second quarter entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
so what was the percentage change over these years?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the difference in net revenue between 2015 and 2016?
[Turn 2] and the specific value for 2016 again?
[Turn 3] so what was the percentage change over these years?

Pre-table text:
amortized over a nine-year period beginning december 2015 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather during the unbilled period and an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales .
the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry , and increased demand from new customers , primarily in the industrial gases industry .
the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc .
the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike .
see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .
included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . a0 see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .
entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2015 net revenue	$ 1666
nuclear realized price changes	-149 ( 149 )
rhode island state energy center	-44 ( 44 )
nuclear volume	-36 ( 36 )
fitzpatrick reimbursement agreement	41
nuclear fuel expenses	68
other	-4 ( 4 )
2016 net revenue	$ 1542

Post-table text:
as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 124 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices and lower capacity prices , the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa , and vermont yankee capacity revenue .
the effect of the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa and vermont yankee capacity revenue on the net revenue variance from 2015 to 2016 is minimal ; 2022 the sale of the rhode island state energy center in december 2015 .
see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale ; and 2022 lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more refueling outage days in 2016 as compared to 2015 and larger exercise of resupply options in 2016 as compared to 2015 .
see 201cnuclear matters - indian point 201d below for discussion of the extended indian point 2 outage in the second quarter entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred in 2013?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred in 2013?

Pre-table text:
the analysis of our depreciation studies .
changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively .
under group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized .
the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies .
the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes .
because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate .
in addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies .
any deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets .
for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies .
a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations .
when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use .
however , many of our assets are self-constructed .
a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects .
costs that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized .
direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment .
indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset .
general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred .
normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized .
these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases .
total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , $ 2.3 billion for 2013 , and $ 2.1 billion for 2012 .
assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .
amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .
13 .
accounts payable and other current liabilities dec .
31 , dec .
31 , millions 2014 2013 .

Table:
millions	dec . 31 2014	dec . 312013
accounts payable	$ 877	$ 803
dividends payable	438	356
income and other taxes payable	412	491
accrued wages and vacation	409	385
accrued casualty costs	249	207
interest payable	178	169
equipment rents payable	100	96
other	640	579
total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities	$ 3303	$ 3086

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and in 2012?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred in 2013?
[Turn 2] and in 2012?

Pre-table text:
the analysis of our depreciation studies .
changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively .
under group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized .
the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies .
the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes .
because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate .
in addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies .
any deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets .
for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies .
a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations .
when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use .
however , many of our assets are self-constructed .
a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects .
costs that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized .
direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment .
indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset .
general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred .
normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized .
these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases .
total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , $ 2.3 billion for 2013 , and $ 2.1 billion for 2012 .
assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .
amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .
13 .
accounts payable and other current liabilities dec .
31 , dec .
31 , millions 2014 2013 .

Table:
millions	dec . 31 2014	dec . 312013
accounts payable	$ 877	$ 803
dividends payable	438	356
income and other taxes payable	412	491
accrued wages and vacation	409	385
accrued casualty costs	249	207
interest payable	178	169
equipment rents payable	100	96
other	640	579
total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities	$ 3303	$ 3086

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the difference between the two values?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred in 2013?
[Turn 2] and in 2012?
[Turn 3] what was the difference between the two values?

Pre-table text:
the analysis of our depreciation studies .
changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively .
under group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized .
the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies .
the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes .
because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate .
in addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies .
any deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets .
for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies .
a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations .
when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use .
however , many of our assets are self-constructed .
a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects .
costs that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized .
direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment .
indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset .
general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred .
normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized .
these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases .
total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , $ 2.3 billion for 2013 , and $ 2.1 billion for 2012 .
assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .
amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .
13 .
accounts payable and other current liabilities dec .
31 , dec .
31 , millions 2014 2013 .

Table:
millions	dec . 31 2014	dec . 312013
accounts payable	$ 877	$ 803
dividends payable	438	356
income and other taxes payable	412	491
accrued wages and vacation	409	385
accrued casualty costs	249	207
interest payable	178	169
equipment rents payable	100	96
other	640	579
total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities	$ 3303	$ 3086

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.