[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was the equivalent of that as a percentage of the 2015 net interest?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the decrease amount on the net interest from fiscal year 2015 to 2016?
[Turn 2] and what was the equivalent of that as a percentage of the 2015 net interest?

Pre-table text:
increased investment in programming to support subscriber growth , higher offer costs and continued investment in presto , partially offset by lower depreciation expense resulting from foxtel 2019s reassessment of the useful lives of cable and satellite installations .
net income decreased as a result of the lower operating income noted above , partially offset by lower income tax expense .
( b ) other equity affiliates , net for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 includes losses primarily from the company 2019s interests in draftstars and elara technologies , which owns proptiger .
interest , net 2014interest , net for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 decreased $ 13 million , or 23% ( 23 % ) , as compared to fiscal 2015 , primarily due to the negative impact of foreign currency fluctuations and interest expense associated with the rea facility .
( see note 9 to the consolidated financial statements ) .
other , net 2014 for the fiscal years ended june 30 .

Table:
( in millions )	for the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2016	for the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2015
gain on iproperty transaction ( a )	$ 29	$ 2014
impairment of marketable securities and cost method investments ( b )	-21 ( 21 )	-5 ( 5 )
gain on sale of marketable securities ( c )	2014	29
dividends received from cost method investments	2014	25
gain on sale of cost method investments	2014	15
other	10	11
total other net	$ 18	$ 75

Post-table text:
( a ) rea group recognized a gain of $ 29 million resulting from the revaluation of its previously held equity interest in iproperty during the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 .
( see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements ) .
( b ) the company recorded write-offs and impairments of certain investments in the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2016 and 2015 .
these write-offs and impairments were taken either as a result of the deteriorating financial position of the investee or due to an other-than-temporary impairment resulting from sustained losses and limited prospects for recovery .
( see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements. ) ( c ) in august 2014 , rea group completed the sale of a minority interest held in marketable securities for total cash consideration of $ 104 million .
as a result of the sale , rea group recognized a pre-tax gain of $ 29 million , which was reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income and included in other , net in the statement of operations .
income tax benefit ( expense ) 2014the company 2019s income tax benefit and effective tax rate for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 were $ 54 million and ( 30% ( 30 % ) ) , respectively , as compared to an income tax expense and effective tax rate of $ 185 million and 34% ( 34 % ) , respectively , for fiscal 2015 .
for the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2016 the company recorded a tax benefit of $ 54 million on pre-tax income of $ 181 million resulting in an effective tax rate that was lower than the u.s .
statutory tax .
the lower tax rate was primarily due to a tax benefit of approximately $ 106 million related to the release of previously established valuation allowances related to certain u.s .
federal net operating losses and state deferred tax assets .
this benefit was recognized in conjunction with management 2019s plan to dispose of the company 2019s digital education business in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 , as the company now expects to generate sufficient u.s .
taxable income to utilize these deferred tax assets prior to expiration .
in addition , the effective tax rate was also impacted by the $ 29 million non-taxable gain resulting from the revaluation of rea group 2019s previously held equity interest in iproperty .
for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2015 , the company 2019s effective tax rate was lower than the u.s .
statutory tax rate primarily due to the impact from foreign operations which are subject to lower tax rates , partially offset by the impact of nondeductible items and changes in our accrued liabilities for uncertain tax positions .
( see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
considering, then, that decrease amount and how much it represents in relation to this 2015 net interest, what was the full amount of this net interest?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the decrease amount on the net interest from fiscal year 2015 to 2016?
[Turn 2] and what was the equivalent of that as a percentage of the 2015 net interest?
[Turn 3] considering, then, that decrease amount and how much it represents in relation to this 2015 net interest, what was the full amount of this net interest?

Pre-table text:
increased investment in programming to support subscriber growth , higher offer costs and continued investment in presto , partially offset by lower depreciation expense resulting from foxtel 2019s reassessment of the useful lives of cable and satellite installations .
net income decreased as a result of the lower operating income noted above , partially offset by lower income tax expense .
( b ) other equity affiliates , net for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 includes losses primarily from the company 2019s interests in draftstars and elara technologies , which owns proptiger .
interest , net 2014interest , net for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 decreased $ 13 million , or 23% ( 23 % ) , as compared to fiscal 2015 , primarily due to the negative impact of foreign currency fluctuations and interest expense associated with the rea facility .
( see note 9 to the consolidated financial statements ) .
other , net 2014 for the fiscal years ended june 30 .

Table:
( in millions )	for the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2016	for the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2015
gain on iproperty transaction ( a )	$ 29	$ 2014
impairment of marketable securities and cost method investments ( b )	-21 ( 21 )	-5 ( 5 )
gain on sale of marketable securities ( c )	2014	29
dividends received from cost method investments	2014	25
gain on sale of cost method investments	2014	15
other	10	11
total other net	$ 18	$ 75

Post-table text:
( a ) rea group recognized a gain of $ 29 million resulting from the revaluation of its previously held equity interest in iproperty during the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 .
( see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements ) .
( b ) the company recorded write-offs and impairments of certain investments in the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2016 and 2015 .
these write-offs and impairments were taken either as a result of the deteriorating financial position of the investee or due to an other-than-temporary impairment resulting from sustained losses and limited prospects for recovery .
( see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements. ) ( c ) in august 2014 , rea group completed the sale of a minority interest held in marketable securities for total cash consideration of $ 104 million .
as a result of the sale , rea group recognized a pre-tax gain of $ 29 million , which was reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income and included in other , net in the statement of operations .
income tax benefit ( expense ) 2014the company 2019s income tax benefit and effective tax rate for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 were $ 54 million and ( 30% ( 30 % ) ) , respectively , as compared to an income tax expense and effective tax rate of $ 185 million and 34% ( 34 % ) , respectively , for fiscal 2015 .
for the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2016 the company recorded a tax benefit of $ 54 million on pre-tax income of $ 181 million resulting in an effective tax rate that was lower than the u.s .
statutory tax .
the lower tax rate was primarily due to a tax benefit of approximately $ 106 million related to the release of previously established valuation allowances related to certain u.s .
federal net operating losses and state deferred tax assets .
this benefit was recognized in conjunction with management 2019s plan to dispose of the company 2019s digital education business in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 , as the company now expects to generate sufficient u.s .
taxable income to utilize these deferred tax assets prior to expiration .
in addition , the effective tax rate was also impacted by the $ 29 million non-taxable gain resulting from the revaluation of rea group 2019s previously held equity interest in iproperty .
for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2015 , the company 2019s effective tax rate was lower than the u.s .
statutory tax rate primarily due to the impact from foreign operations which are subject to lower tax rates , partially offset by the impact of nondeductible items and changes in our accrued liabilities for uncertain tax positions .
( see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was the full amount of the 2016 net interest, considering the 2015 one and how much it decreased?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the decrease amount on the net interest from fiscal year 2015 to 2016?
[Turn 2] and what was the equivalent of that as a percentage of the 2015 net interest?
[Turn 3] considering, then, that decrease amount and how much it represents in relation to this 2015 net interest, what was the full amount of this net interest?
[Turn 4] and what was the full amount of the 2016 net interest, considering the 2015 one and how much it decreased?

Pre-table text:
increased investment in programming to support subscriber growth , higher offer costs and continued investment in presto , partially offset by lower depreciation expense resulting from foxtel 2019s reassessment of the useful lives of cable and satellite installations .
net income decreased as a result of the lower operating income noted above , partially offset by lower income tax expense .
( b ) other equity affiliates , net for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 includes losses primarily from the company 2019s interests in draftstars and elara technologies , which owns proptiger .
interest , net 2014interest , net for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 decreased $ 13 million , or 23% ( 23 % ) , as compared to fiscal 2015 , primarily due to the negative impact of foreign currency fluctuations and interest expense associated with the rea facility .
( see note 9 to the consolidated financial statements ) .
other , net 2014 for the fiscal years ended june 30 .

Table:
( in millions )	for the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2016	for the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2015
gain on iproperty transaction ( a )	$ 29	$ 2014
impairment of marketable securities and cost method investments ( b )	-21 ( 21 )	-5 ( 5 )
gain on sale of marketable securities ( c )	2014	29
dividends received from cost method investments	2014	25
gain on sale of cost method investments	2014	15
other	10	11
total other net	$ 18	$ 75

Post-table text:
( a ) rea group recognized a gain of $ 29 million resulting from the revaluation of its previously held equity interest in iproperty during the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 .
( see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements ) .
( b ) the company recorded write-offs and impairments of certain investments in the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2016 and 2015 .
these write-offs and impairments were taken either as a result of the deteriorating financial position of the investee or due to an other-than-temporary impairment resulting from sustained losses and limited prospects for recovery .
( see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements. ) ( c ) in august 2014 , rea group completed the sale of a minority interest held in marketable securities for total cash consideration of $ 104 million .
as a result of the sale , rea group recognized a pre-tax gain of $ 29 million , which was reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income and included in other , net in the statement of operations .
income tax benefit ( expense ) 2014the company 2019s income tax benefit and effective tax rate for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 were $ 54 million and ( 30% ( 30 % ) ) , respectively , as compared to an income tax expense and effective tax rate of $ 185 million and 34% ( 34 % ) , respectively , for fiscal 2015 .
for the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2016 the company recorded a tax benefit of $ 54 million on pre-tax income of $ 181 million resulting in an effective tax rate that was lower than the u.s .
statutory tax .
the lower tax rate was primarily due to a tax benefit of approximately $ 106 million related to the release of previously established valuation allowances related to certain u.s .
federal net operating losses and state deferred tax assets .
this benefit was recognized in conjunction with management 2019s plan to dispose of the company 2019s digital education business in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 , as the company now expects to generate sufficient u.s .
taxable income to utilize these deferred tax assets prior to expiration .
in addition , the effective tax rate was also impacted by the $ 29 million non-taxable gain resulting from the revaluation of rea group 2019s previously held equity interest in iproperty .
for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2015 , the company 2019s effective tax rate was lower than the u.s .
statutory tax rate primarily due to the impact from foreign operations which are subject to lower tax rates , partially offset by the impact of nondeductible items and changes in our accrued liabilities for uncertain tax positions .
( see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the total of annual long-term debt maturities in 2017?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of annual long-term debt maturities in 2017?

Pre-table text:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .
( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .
( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .
the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .
entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations .
( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 149 million at entergy louisiana and $ 97 million at system energy , long-term doe obligations of $ 181 million at entergy arkansas , and the note payable to nypa of $ 95 million at entergy , and includes debt due within one year .
fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .
the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Table:
	amount ( in thousands )
2014	$ 385373
2015	$ 1110566
2016	$ 270852
2017	$ 766801
2018	$ 1324616

Post-table text:
in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .
entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .
these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .
in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .
this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .
in july 2003 a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa .
under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .
entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2015 .
entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2015 .
entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2014 .
capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was it in 2016?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of annual long-term debt maturities in 2017?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2016?

Pre-table text:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .
( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .
( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .
the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .
entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations .
( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 149 million at entergy louisiana and $ 97 million at system energy , long-term doe obligations of $ 181 million at entergy arkansas , and the note payable to nypa of $ 95 million at entergy , and includes debt due within one year .
fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .
the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Table:
	amount ( in thousands )
2014	$ 385373
2015	$ 1110566
2016	$ 270852
2017	$ 766801
2018	$ 1324616

Post-table text:
in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .
entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .
these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .
in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .
this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .
in july 2003 a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa .
under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .
entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2015 .
entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2015 .
entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2014 .
capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was, then, the change over the year?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of annual long-term debt maturities in 2017?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2016?
[Turn 3] what was, then, the change over the year?

Pre-table text:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .
( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .
( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .
the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .
entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations .
( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 149 million at entergy louisiana and $ 97 million at system energy , long-term doe obligations of $ 181 million at entergy arkansas , and the note payable to nypa of $ 95 million at entergy , and includes debt due within one year .
fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .
the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Table:
	amount ( in thousands )
2014	$ 385373
2015	$ 1110566
2016	$ 270852
2017	$ 766801
2018	$ 1324616

Post-table text:
in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .
entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .
these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .
in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .
this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .
in july 2003 a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa .
under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .
entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2015 .
entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2015 .
entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2014 .
capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2016 total, in percentage?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of annual long-term debt maturities in 2017?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2016?
[Turn 3] what was, then, the change over the year?
[Turn 4] and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2016 total, in percentage?

Pre-table text:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .
( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .
( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .
the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .
entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations .
( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 149 million at entergy louisiana and $ 97 million at system energy , long-term doe obligations of $ 181 million at entergy arkansas , and the note payable to nypa of $ 95 million at entergy , and includes debt due within one year .
fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .
the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Table:
	amount ( in thousands )
2014	$ 385373
2015	$ 1110566
2016	$ 270852
2017	$ 766801
2018	$ 1324616

Post-table text:
in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .
entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .
these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .
in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .
this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .
in july 2003 a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa .
under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .
entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2015 .
entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2015 .
entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2014 .
capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the cash by operating activities for 2014?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the cash by operating activities for 2014?

Pre-table text:
we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities .
cash flows millions 2014 2013 2012 .

Table:
cash flowsmillions	2014	2013	2012
cash provided by operating activities	$ 7385	$ 6823	$ 6161
cash used in investing activities	-4249 ( 4249 )	-3405 ( 3405 )	-3633 ( 3633 )
cash used in financing activities	-2982 ( 2982 )	-3049 ( 3049 )	-2682 ( 2682 )
net change in cash and cashequivalents	$ 154	$ 369	$ -154 ( 154 )

Post-table text:
operating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments .
2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation ( discussed below ) .
higher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012 .
in addition , we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations , which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012 .
lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as discussed below ) partially offset the increases .
federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 .
as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years .
congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014 .
investing activities higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013 .
significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects .
capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions .
lower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012 .
included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and in 2013?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the cash by operating activities for 2014?
[Turn 2] and in 2013?

Pre-table text:
we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities .
cash flows millions 2014 2013 2012 .

Table:
cash flowsmillions	2014	2013	2012
cash provided by operating activities	$ 7385	$ 6823	$ 6161
cash used in investing activities	-4249 ( 4249 )	-3405 ( 3405 )	-3633 ( 3633 )
cash used in financing activities	-2982 ( 2982 )	-3049 ( 3049 )	-2682 ( 2682 )
net change in cash and cashequivalents	$ 154	$ 369	$ -154 ( 154 )

Post-table text:
operating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments .
2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation ( discussed below ) .
higher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012 .
in addition , we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations , which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012 .
lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as discussed below ) partially offset the increases .
federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 .
as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years .
congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014 .
investing activities higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013 .
significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects .
capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions .
lower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012 .
included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
so what was the difference between these years?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the cash by operating activities for 2014?
[Turn 2] and in 2013?
[Turn 3] so what was the difference between these years?

Pre-table text:
we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities .
cash flows millions 2014 2013 2012 .

Table:
cash flowsmillions	2014	2013	2012
cash provided by operating activities	$ 7385	$ 6823	$ 6161
cash used in investing activities	-4249 ( 4249 )	-3405 ( 3405 )	-3633 ( 3633 )
cash used in financing activities	-2982 ( 2982 )	-3049 ( 3049 )	-2682 ( 2682 )
net change in cash and cashequivalents	$ 154	$ 369	$ -154 ( 154 )

Post-table text:
operating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments .
2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation ( discussed below ) .
higher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012 .
in addition , we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations , which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012 .
lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as discussed below ) partially offset the increases .
federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 .
as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years .
congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014 .
investing activities higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013 .
significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects .
capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions .
lower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012 .
included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and the percentage change over this time?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the cash by operating activities for 2014?
[Turn 2] and in 2013?
[Turn 3] so what was the difference between these years?
[Turn 4] and the percentage change over this time?

Pre-table text:
we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities .
cash flows millions 2014 2013 2012 .

Table:
cash flowsmillions	2014	2013	2012
cash provided by operating activities	$ 7385	$ 6823	$ 6161
cash used in investing activities	-4249 ( 4249 )	-3405 ( 3405 )	-3633 ( 3633 )
cash used in financing activities	-2982 ( 2982 )	-3049 ( 3049 )	-2682 ( 2682 )
net change in cash and cashequivalents	$ 154	$ 369	$ -154 ( 154 )

Post-table text:
operating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments .
2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation ( discussed below ) .
higher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012 .
in addition , we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations , which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012 .
lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as discussed below ) partially offset the increases .
federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 .
as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years .
congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014 .
investing activities higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013 .
significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects .
capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions .
lower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012 .
included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the increase observed in the net revenue from 2007 to 2008?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the increase observed in the net revenue from 2007 to 2008?

Pre-table text:
entergy new orleans , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2007 net revenue	$ 231.0
volume/weather	15.5
net gas revenue	6.6
rider revenue	3.9
base revenue	-11.3 ( 11.3 )
other	7.0
2008 net revenue	$ 252.7

Post-table text:
the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 .
entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 .
billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) .
the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 .
refer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase .
the rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 .
the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account .
the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .
the base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 .
the base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .
gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 .
fuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was that net revenue in 2007?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the increase observed in the net revenue from 2007 to 2008?
[Turn 2] what was that net revenue in 2007?

Pre-table text:
entergy new orleans , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2007 net revenue	$ 231.0
volume/weather	15.5
net gas revenue	6.6
rider revenue	3.9
base revenue	-11.3 ( 11.3 )
other	7.0
2008 net revenue	$ 252.7

Post-table text:
the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 .
entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 .
billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) .
the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 .
refer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase .
the rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 .
the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account .
the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .
the base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 .
the base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .
gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 .
fuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
how much, then, did that increase represent in relation to this 2007 amount?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the increase observed in the net revenue from 2007 to 2008?
[Turn 2] what was that net revenue in 2007?
[Turn 3] how much, then, did that increase represent in relation to this 2007 amount?

Pre-table text:
entergy new orleans , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2007 net revenue	$ 231.0
volume/weather	15.5
net gas revenue	6.6
rider revenue	3.9
base revenue	-11.3 ( 11.3 )
other	7.0
2008 net revenue	$ 252.7

Post-table text:
the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 .
entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 .
billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) .
the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 .
refer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase .
the rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 .
the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account .
the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .
the base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 .
the base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .
gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 .
fuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what percentage of that increase between the years was due to rider revenue?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the increase observed in the net revenue from 2007 to 2008?
[Turn 2] what was that net revenue in 2007?
[Turn 3] how much, then, did that increase represent in relation to this 2007 amount?
[Turn 4] and what percentage of that increase between the years was due to rider revenue?

Pre-table text:
entergy new orleans , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2007 net revenue	$ 231.0
volume/weather	15.5
net gas revenue	6.6
rider revenue	3.9
base revenue	-11.3 ( 11.3 )
other	7.0
2008 net revenue	$ 252.7

Post-table text:
the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 .
entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 .
billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) .
the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 .
refer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase .
the rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 .
the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account .
the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .
the base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 .
the base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .
gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 .
fuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the change in the rsus from 2009 to 2010?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the rsus from 2009 to 2010?

Pre-table text:
material impact on the service cost and interest cost components of net periodic benefit costs for a 1% ( 1 % ) change in the assumed health care trend rate .
for most of the participants in the u.s .
plan , aon 2019s liability for future plan cost increases for pre-65 and medical supplement plan coverage is limited to 5% ( 5 % ) per annum .
because of this cap , net employer trend rates for these plans are effectively limited to 5% ( 5 % ) per year in the future .
during 2007 , aon recognized a plan amendment which phases out post-65 retiree coverage in its u.s .
plan over the next three years .
the impact of this amendment on net periodic benefit cost is being recognized over the average remaining service life of the employees .
14 .
stock compensation plans the following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense recognized in continuing operations in the consolidated statements of income in compensation and benefits ( in millions ) : .

Table:
years ended december 31	2010	2009	2008
rsus	$ 138	$ 124	$ 132
performance plans	62	60	67
stock options	17	21	24
employee stock purchase plans	4	4	3
total stock-based compensation expense	221	209	226
tax benefit	75	68	82
stock-based compensation expense net of tax	$ 146	$ 141	$ 144

Post-table text:
during 2009 , the company converted its stock administration system to a new service provider .
in connection with this conversion , a reconciliation of the methodologies and estimates utilized was performed , which resulted in a $ 12 million reduction of expense for the year ended december 31 , 2009 .
stock awards stock awards , in the form of rsus , are granted to certain employees and consist of both performance-based and service-based rsus .
service-based awards generally vest between three and ten years from the date of grant .
the fair value of service-based awards is based upon the market value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant .
with certain limited exceptions , any break in continuous employment will cause the forfeiture of all unvested awards .
compensation expense associated with stock awards is recognized over the service period .
dividend equivalents are paid on certain service-based rsus , based on the initial grant amount .
performance-based rsus have been granted to certain employees .
vesting of these awards is contingent upon meeting various individual , divisional or company-wide performance conditions , including revenue generation or growth in revenue , pretax income or earnings per share over a one- to five-year period .
the performance conditions are not considered in the determination of the grant date fair value for these awards .
the fair value of performance-based awards is based upon the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant .
compensation expense is recognized over the performance period , and in certain cases an additional vesting period , based on management 2019s estimate of the number of units expected to vest .
compensation expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of shares paid out at the end of the programs .
the actual payout of shares under these performance- based plans may range from 0-200% ( 0-200 % ) of the number of units granted , based on the plan .
dividend equivalents are generally not paid on the performance-based rsus .
during 2010 , the company granted approximately 1.6 million shares in connection with the completion of the 2007 leadership performance plan ( 2018 2018lpp 2019 2019 ) cycle and 84000 shares related to other performance plans .
during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company granted approximately 3.5 million .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and how much does this change represent in relation to that rsus in 2009, in percentage?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the rsus from 2009 to 2010?
[Turn 2] and how much does this change represent in relation to that rsus in 2009, in percentage?

Pre-table text:
material impact on the service cost and interest cost components of net periodic benefit costs for a 1% ( 1 % ) change in the assumed health care trend rate .
for most of the participants in the u.s .
plan , aon 2019s liability for future plan cost increases for pre-65 and medical supplement plan coverage is limited to 5% ( 5 % ) per annum .
because of this cap , net employer trend rates for these plans are effectively limited to 5% ( 5 % ) per year in the future .
during 2007 , aon recognized a plan amendment which phases out post-65 retiree coverage in its u.s .
plan over the next three years .
the impact of this amendment on net periodic benefit cost is being recognized over the average remaining service life of the employees .
14 .
stock compensation plans the following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense recognized in continuing operations in the consolidated statements of income in compensation and benefits ( in millions ) : .

Table:
years ended december 31	2010	2009	2008
rsus	$ 138	$ 124	$ 132
performance plans	62	60	67
stock options	17	21	24
employee stock purchase plans	4	4	3
total stock-based compensation expense	221	209	226
tax benefit	75	68	82
stock-based compensation expense net of tax	$ 146	$ 141	$ 144

Post-table text:
during 2009 , the company converted its stock administration system to a new service provider .
in connection with this conversion , a reconciliation of the methodologies and estimates utilized was performed , which resulted in a $ 12 million reduction of expense for the year ended december 31 , 2009 .
stock awards stock awards , in the form of rsus , are granted to certain employees and consist of both performance-based and service-based rsus .
service-based awards generally vest between three and ten years from the date of grant .
the fair value of service-based awards is based upon the market value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant .
with certain limited exceptions , any break in continuous employment will cause the forfeiture of all unvested awards .
compensation expense associated with stock awards is recognized over the service period .
dividend equivalents are paid on certain service-based rsus , based on the initial grant amount .
performance-based rsus have been granted to certain employees .
vesting of these awards is contingent upon meeting various individual , divisional or company-wide performance conditions , including revenue generation or growth in revenue , pretax income or earnings per share over a one- to five-year period .
the performance conditions are not considered in the determination of the grant date fair value for these awards .
the fair value of performance-based awards is based upon the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant .
compensation expense is recognized over the performance period , and in certain cases an additional vesting period , based on management 2019s estimate of the number of units expected to vest .
compensation expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of shares paid out at the end of the programs .
the actual payout of shares under these performance- based plans may range from 0-200% ( 0-200 % ) of the number of units granted , based on the plan .
dividend equivalents are generally not paid on the performance-based rsus .
during 2010 , the company granted approximately 1.6 million shares in connection with the completion of the 2007 leadership performance plan ( 2018 2018lpp 2019 2019 ) cycle and 84000 shares related to other performance plans .
during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company granted approximately 3.5 million .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
in the year of 2006, what amount from the consumer packaging sales was due to foodservice net sales?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] in the year of 2006, what amount from the consumer packaging sales was due to foodservice net sales?

Pre-table text:
earnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2006 .
containerboard export sales volumes are expected to decline due to scheduled first-quarter main- tenance outages .
sales volumes for u.s .
converted products will be higher due to more shipping days , but expected softer demand should cause the ship- ments per day to decrease .
average sales price real- izations are expected to be comparable to fourth- quarter averages .
an additional containerboard price increase was announced in january that is expected to be fully realized in the second quarter .
costs for wood , energy , starch , adhesives and freight are expected to increase .
manufacturing costs will be higher due to costs associated with scheduled main- tenance outages in the containerboard mills .
euro- pean container operating results are expected to improve as seasonally higher sales volumes and improved margins more than offset slightly higher manufacturing costs .
consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity .
in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix .
consumer packaging net sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) compared with 2005 and 7% ( 7 % ) compared with 2004 .
operating profits rose 8% ( 8 % ) from 2005 , but declined 15% ( 15 % ) from 2004 levels .
compared with 2005 , higher sales volumes ( $ 9 million ) , improved average sales price realizations ( $ 33 million ) , reduced lack-of-order downtime ( $ 18 million ) , and favorable mill oper- ations ( $ 25 million ) were partially offset by higher raw material costs ( $ 19 million ) and freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , unfavorable mix ( $ 14 million ) and other costs ( $ 21 million ) .
consumer packaging in millions 2006 2005 2004 .

Table:
in millions	2006	2005	2004
sales	$ 2455	$ 2245	$ 2295
operating profit	$ 131	$ 121	$ 155

Post-table text:
coated paperboard net sales of $ 1.5 billion in 2006 were higher than $ 1.3 billion in 2005 and $ 1.1 billion in 2004 .
sales volumes increased in 2006 compared with 2005 , particularly in the folding car- ton board segment , reflecting improved demand for coated paperboard products .
in 2006 , our coated paperboard mills took 4000 tons of lack-of-order downtime , compared with 82000 tons of lack-of-order downtime in 2005 .
average sales price realizations were substantially improved in the cur- rent year , principally for folding carton board and cupstock board .
operating profits were 51% ( 51 % ) higher in 2006 than in 2005 , and 7% ( 7 % ) better than in 2004 .
the impact of the higher sales prices along with more favorable manufacturing operations due to strong performance at the mills more than offset higher input costs for energy and freight .
foodservice net sales declined to $ 396 million in 2006 , compared with $ 437 million in 2005 and $ 480 million in 2004 , due principally to the sale of the jackson , tennessee plant in july 2005 .
sales vol- umes were lower in 2006 than in 2005 , although average sales prices were higher due to the realiza- tion of price increases implemented during 2005 .
operating profits for 2006 improved over 2005 and 2004 levels largely due to the benefits from higher sales prices .
raw material costs for bleached board were higher than in 2005 , but manufacturing costs were more favorable due to increased productivity and reduced waste .
shorewood net sales of $ 670 million were down from $ 691 million in 2005 and $ 687 million in 2004 .
sales volumes in 2006 were down from 2005 levels due to weak demand in the home entertainment and consumer products markets , although demand was strong in the tobacco segment .
average sales prices for the year were lower than in 2005 .
operating prof- its were down significantly from both 2005 and 2004 due to the decline in sales , particularly in the higher margin home entertainment markets , higher raw material costs for bleached board and certain inventory adjustment costs .
entering 2007 , coated paperboard first-quarter sales volumes are expected to be seasonally stronger than in the fourth quarter 2006 for folding carton board and bristols .
average sales price realizations are expected to rise with a price increase announced in january .
it is anticipated that manufacturing costs will improve versus an unfavorable fourth quarter .
foodservice earnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to decline due to seasonally weaker vol- ume .
however , sales price realizations will be slightly higher , and the seasonal switch to hot cup contain- ers will have a favorable impact on product mix .
shorewood sales volumes for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to seasonally decline , but the earnings impact will be partially offset by pricing improvements and an improved product mix .
distribution our distribution business , principally represented by our xpedx business , markets a diverse array of products and supply chain services to customers in .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was the total of those consumer packaging sales?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] in the year of 2006, what amount from the consumer packaging sales was due to foodservice net sales?
[Turn 2] and what was the total of those consumer packaging sales?

Pre-table text:
earnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2006 .
containerboard export sales volumes are expected to decline due to scheduled first-quarter main- tenance outages .
sales volumes for u.s .
converted products will be higher due to more shipping days , but expected softer demand should cause the ship- ments per day to decrease .
average sales price real- izations are expected to be comparable to fourth- quarter averages .
an additional containerboard price increase was announced in january that is expected to be fully realized in the second quarter .
costs for wood , energy , starch , adhesives and freight are expected to increase .
manufacturing costs will be higher due to costs associated with scheduled main- tenance outages in the containerboard mills .
euro- pean container operating results are expected to improve as seasonally higher sales volumes and improved margins more than offset slightly higher manufacturing costs .
consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity .
in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix .
consumer packaging net sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) compared with 2005 and 7% ( 7 % ) compared with 2004 .
operating profits rose 8% ( 8 % ) from 2005 , but declined 15% ( 15 % ) from 2004 levels .
compared with 2005 , higher sales volumes ( $ 9 million ) , improved average sales price realizations ( $ 33 million ) , reduced lack-of-order downtime ( $ 18 million ) , and favorable mill oper- ations ( $ 25 million ) were partially offset by higher raw material costs ( $ 19 million ) and freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , unfavorable mix ( $ 14 million ) and other costs ( $ 21 million ) .
consumer packaging in millions 2006 2005 2004 .

Table:
in millions	2006	2005	2004
sales	$ 2455	$ 2245	$ 2295
operating profit	$ 131	$ 121	$ 155

Post-table text:
coated paperboard net sales of $ 1.5 billion in 2006 were higher than $ 1.3 billion in 2005 and $ 1.1 billion in 2004 .
sales volumes increased in 2006 compared with 2005 , particularly in the folding car- ton board segment , reflecting improved demand for coated paperboard products .
in 2006 , our coated paperboard mills took 4000 tons of lack-of-order downtime , compared with 82000 tons of lack-of-order downtime in 2005 .
average sales price realizations were substantially improved in the cur- rent year , principally for folding carton board and cupstock board .
operating profits were 51% ( 51 % ) higher in 2006 than in 2005 , and 7% ( 7 % ) better than in 2004 .
the impact of the higher sales prices along with more favorable manufacturing operations due to strong performance at the mills more than offset higher input costs for energy and freight .
foodservice net sales declined to $ 396 million in 2006 , compared with $ 437 million in 2005 and $ 480 million in 2004 , due principally to the sale of the jackson , tennessee plant in july 2005 .
sales vol- umes were lower in 2006 than in 2005 , although average sales prices were higher due to the realiza- tion of price increases implemented during 2005 .
operating profits for 2006 improved over 2005 and 2004 levels largely due to the benefits from higher sales prices .
raw material costs for bleached board were higher than in 2005 , but manufacturing costs were more favorable due to increased productivity and reduced waste .
shorewood net sales of $ 670 million were down from $ 691 million in 2005 and $ 687 million in 2004 .
sales volumes in 2006 were down from 2005 levels due to weak demand in the home entertainment and consumer products markets , although demand was strong in the tobacco segment .
average sales prices for the year were lower than in 2005 .
operating prof- its were down significantly from both 2005 and 2004 due to the decline in sales , particularly in the higher margin home entertainment markets , higher raw material costs for bleached board and certain inventory adjustment costs .
entering 2007 , coated paperboard first-quarter sales volumes are expected to be seasonally stronger than in the fourth quarter 2006 for folding carton board and bristols .
average sales price realizations are expected to rise with a price increase announced in january .
it is anticipated that manufacturing costs will improve versus an unfavorable fourth quarter .
foodservice earnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to decline due to seasonally weaker vol- ume .
however , sales price realizations will be slightly higher , and the seasonal switch to hot cup contain- ers will have a favorable impact on product mix .
shorewood sales volumes for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to seasonally decline , but the earnings impact will be partially offset by pricing improvements and an improved product mix .
distribution our distribution business , principally represented by our xpedx business , markets a diverse array of products and supply chain services to customers in .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what percentage, then, of this total did that amount represent?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] in the year of 2006, what amount from the consumer packaging sales was due to foodservice net sales?
[Turn 2] and what was the total of those consumer packaging sales?
[Turn 3] what percentage, then, of this total did that amount represent?

Pre-table text:
earnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2006 .
containerboard export sales volumes are expected to decline due to scheduled first-quarter main- tenance outages .
sales volumes for u.s .
converted products will be higher due to more shipping days , but expected softer demand should cause the ship- ments per day to decrease .
average sales price real- izations are expected to be comparable to fourth- quarter averages .
an additional containerboard price increase was announced in january that is expected to be fully realized in the second quarter .
costs for wood , energy , starch , adhesives and freight are expected to increase .
manufacturing costs will be higher due to costs associated with scheduled main- tenance outages in the containerboard mills .
euro- pean container operating results are expected to improve as seasonally higher sales volumes and improved margins more than offset slightly higher manufacturing costs .
consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity .
in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix .
consumer packaging net sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) compared with 2005 and 7% ( 7 % ) compared with 2004 .
operating profits rose 8% ( 8 % ) from 2005 , but declined 15% ( 15 % ) from 2004 levels .
compared with 2005 , higher sales volumes ( $ 9 million ) , improved average sales price realizations ( $ 33 million ) , reduced lack-of-order downtime ( $ 18 million ) , and favorable mill oper- ations ( $ 25 million ) were partially offset by higher raw material costs ( $ 19 million ) and freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , unfavorable mix ( $ 14 million ) and other costs ( $ 21 million ) .
consumer packaging in millions 2006 2005 2004 .

Table:
in millions	2006	2005	2004
sales	$ 2455	$ 2245	$ 2295
operating profit	$ 131	$ 121	$ 155

Post-table text:
coated paperboard net sales of $ 1.5 billion in 2006 were higher than $ 1.3 billion in 2005 and $ 1.1 billion in 2004 .
sales volumes increased in 2006 compared with 2005 , particularly in the folding car- ton board segment , reflecting improved demand for coated paperboard products .
in 2006 , our coated paperboard mills took 4000 tons of lack-of-order downtime , compared with 82000 tons of lack-of-order downtime in 2005 .
average sales price realizations were substantially improved in the cur- rent year , principally for folding carton board and cupstock board .
operating profits were 51% ( 51 % ) higher in 2006 than in 2005 , and 7% ( 7 % ) better than in 2004 .
the impact of the higher sales prices along with more favorable manufacturing operations due to strong performance at the mills more than offset higher input costs for energy and freight .
foodservice net sales declined to $ 396 million in 2006 , compared with $ 437 million in 2005 and $ 480 million in 2004 , due principally to the sale of the jackson , tennessee plant in july 2005 .
sales vol- umes were lower in 2006 than in 2005 , although average sales prices were higher due to the realiza- tion of price increases implemented during 2005 .
operating profits for 2006 improved over 2005 and 2004 levels largely due to the benefits from higher sales prices .
raw material costs for bleached board were higher than in 2005 , but manufacturing costs were more favorable due to increased productivity and reduced waste .
shorewood net sales of $ 670 million were down from $ 691 million in 2005 and $ 687 million in 2004 .
sales volumes in 2006 were down from 2005 levels due to weak demand in the home entertainment and consumer products markets , although demand was strong in the tobacco segment .
average sales prices for the year were lower than in 2005 .
operating prof- its were down significantly from both 2005 and 2004 due to the decline in sales , particularly in the higher margin home entertainment markets , higher raw material costs for bleached board and certain inventory adjustment costs .
entering 2007 , coated paperboard first-quarter sales volumes are expected to be seasonally stronger than in the fourth quarter 2006 for folding carton board and bristols .
average sales price realizations are expected to rise with a price increase announced in january .
it is anticipated that manufacturing costs will improve versus an unfavorable fourth quarter .
foodservice earnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to decline due to seasonally weaker vol- ume .
however , sales price realizations will be slightly higher , and the seasonal switch to hot cup contain- ers will have a favorable impact on product mix .
shorewood sales volumes for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to seasonally decline , but the earnings impact will be partially offset by pricing improvements and an improved product mix .
distribution our distribution business , principally represented by our xpedx business , markets a diverse array of products and supply chain services to customers in .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was this percentage representation in the previous year, in 2005?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] in the year of 2006, what amount from the consumer packaging sales was due to foodservice net sales?
[Turn 2] and what was the total of those consumer packaging sales?
[Turn 3] what percentage, then, of this total did that amount represent?
[Turn 4] and what was this percentage representation in the previous year, in 2005?

Pre-table text:
earnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2006 .
containerboard export sales volumes are expected to decline due to scheduled first-quarter main- tenance outages .
sales volumes for u.s .
converted products will be higher due to more shipping days , but expected softer demand should cause the ship- ments per day to decrease .
average sales price real- izations are expected to be comparable to fourth- quarter averages .
an additional containerboard price increase was announced in january that is expected to be fully realized in the second quarter .
costs for wood , energy , starch , adhesives and freight are expected to increase .
manufacturing costs will be higher due to costs associated with scheduled main- tenance outages in the containerboard mills .
euro- pean container operating results are expected to improve as seasonally higher sales volumes and improved margins more than offset slightly higher manufacturing costs .
consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity .
in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix .
consumer packaging net sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) compared with 2005 and 7% ( 7 % ) compared with 2004 .
operating profits rose 8% ( 8 % ) from 2005 , but declined 15% ( 15 % ) from 2004 levels .
compared with 2005 , higher sales volumes ( $ 9 million ) , improved average sales price realizations ( $ 33 million ) , reduced lack-of-order downtime ( $ 18 million ) , and favorable mill oper- ations ( $ 25 million ) were partially offset by higher raw material costs ( $ 19 million ) and freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , unfavorable mix ( $ 14 million ) and other costs ( $ 21 million ) .
consumer packaging in millions 2006 2005 2004 .

Table:
in millions	2006	2005	2004
sales	$ 2455	$ 2245	$ 2295
operating profit	$ 131	$ 121	$ 155

Post-table text:
coated paperboard net sales of $ 1.5 billion in 2006 were higher than $ 1.3 billion in 2005 and $ 1.1 billion in 2004 .
sales volumes increased in 2006 compared with 2005 , particularly in the folding car- ton board segment , reflecting improved demand for coated paperboard products .
in 2006 , our coated paperboard mills took 4000 tons of lack-of-order downtime , compared with 82000 tons of lack-of-order downtime in 2005 .
average sales price realizations were substantially improved in the cur- rent year , principally for folding carton board and cupstock board .
operating profits were 51% ( 51 % ) higher in 2006 than in 2005 , and 7% ( 7 % ) better than in 2004 .
the impact of the higher sales prices along with more favorable manufacturing operations due to strong performance at the mills more than offset higher input costs for energy and freight .
foodservice net sales declined to $ 396 million in 2006 , compared with $ 437 million in 2005 and $ 480 million in 2004 , due principally to the sale of the jackson , tennessee plant in july 2005 .
sales vol- umes were lower in 2006 than in 2005 , although average sales prices were higher due to the realiza- tion of price increases implemented during 2005 .
operating profits for 2006 improved over 2005 and 2004 levels largely due to the benefits from higher sales prices .
raw material costs for bleached board were higher than in 2005 , but manufacturing costs were more favorable due to increased productivity and reduced waste .
shorewood net sales of $ 670 million were down from $ 691 million in 2005 and $ 687 million in 2004 .
sales volumes in 2006 were down from 2005 levels due to weak demand in the home entertainment and consumer products markets , although demand was strong in the tobacco segment .
average sales prices for the year were lower than in 2005 .
operating prof- its were down significantly from both 2005 and 2004 due to the decline in sales , particularly in the higher margin home entertainment markets , higher raw material costs for bleached board and certain inventory adjustment costs .
entering 2007 , coated paperboard first-quarter sales volumes are expected to be seasonally stronger than in the fourth quarter 2006 for folding carton board and bristols .
average sales price realizations are expected to rise with a price increase announced in january .
it is anticipated that manufacturing costs will improve versus an unfavorable fourth quarter .
foodservice earnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to decline due to seasonally weaker vol- ume .
however , sales price realizations will be slightly higher , and the seasonal switch to hot cup contain- ers will have a favorable impact on product mix .
shorewood sales volumes for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to seasonally decline , but the earnings impact will be partially offset by pricing improvements and an improved product mix .
distribution our distribution business , principally represented by our xpedx business , markets a diverse array of products and supply chain services to customers in .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.