[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the value in 2008?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net change in rental expense for operating leases from 2008 to 2009?
[Turn 2] what was the value in 2008?

Pre-table text:
the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

Table:
2011	$ 62465
2012	54236
2013	47860
2014	37660
2015	28622
thereafter	79800
future minimum lease payments	$ 310643

Post-table text:
rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations .
typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods .
we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property .
lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases .
the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost .
in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall .
similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value .
had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million .
we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value .
litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s .
infringed on ford design patents .
the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 .
pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s .
of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s .
design patent .
we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell .
the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income .
we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business .
we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the net change divided by the 2008 value?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net change in rental expense for operating leases from 2008 to 2009?
[Turn 2] what was the value in 2008?
[Turn 3] what is the net change divided by the 2008 value?

Pre-table text:
the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

Table:
2011	$ 62465
2012	54236
2013	47860
2014	37660
2015	28622
thereafter	79800
future minimum lease payments	$ 310643

Post-table text:
rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations .
typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods .
we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property .
lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases .
the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost .
in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall .
similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value .
had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million .
we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value .
litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s .
infringed on ford design patents .
the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 .
pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s .
of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s .
design patent .
we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell .
the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income .
we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business .
we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the aaa interest rate in 2009?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the aaa interest rate in 2009?

Pre-table text:
market street commitments by credit rating ( a ) december 31 , december 31 .

Table:
	december 31 2009	december 312008
aaa/aaa	14% ( 14 % )	19% ( 19 % )
aa/aa	50	6
a/a	34	72
bbb/baa	2	3
total	100% ( 100 % )	100% ( 100 % )

Post-table text:
( a ) the majority of our facilities are not explicitly rated by the rating agencies .
all facilities are structured to meet rating agency standards for applicable rating levels .
we evaluated the design of market street , its capital structure , the note , and relationships among the variable interest holders .
based on this analysis and under accounting guidance effective during 2009 and 2008 , we are not the primary beneficiary and therefore the assets and liabilities of market street are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .
we considered changes to the variable interest holders ( such as new expected loss note investors and changes to program- level credit enhancement providers ) , terms of expected loss notes , and new types of risks related to market street as reconsideration events .
we reviewed the activities of market street on at least a quarterly basis to determine if a reconsideration event has occurred .
tax credit investments we make certain equity investments in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies ( llcs ) that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the low income housing tax credit ( lihtc ) pursuant to sections 42 and 47 of the internal revenue code .
the purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital , to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings and to assist us in achieving goals associated with the community reinvestment act .
the primary activities of the investments include the identification , development and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants .
generally , these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity .
we typically invest in these partnerships as a limited partner or non-managing member .
also , we are a national syndicator of affordable housing equity ( together with the investments described above , the 201clihtc investments 201d ) .
in these syndication transactions , we create funds in which our subsidiaries are the general partner or managing member and sell limited partnership or non-managing member interests to third parties , and in some cases may also purchase a limited partnership or non-managing member interest in the fund .
the purpose of this business is to generate income from the syndication of these funds , generate servicing fees by managing the funds , and earn tax credits to reduce our tax liability .
general partner or managing member activities include selecting , evaluating , structuring , negotiating , and closing the fund investments in operating limited partnerships , as well as oversight of the ongoing operations of the fund portfolio .
we evaluate our interests and third party interests in the limited partnerships/llcs in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary .
the primary beneficiary determination is based on which party absorbs a majority of the variability .
the primary sources of variability in lihtc investments are the tax credits , tax benefits due to passive losses on the investments and development and operating cash flows .
we have consolidated lihtc investments in which we absorb a majority of the variability and thus are considered the primary beneficiary .
the assets are primarily included in equity investments and other assets on our consolidated balance sheet with the liabilities classified in other liabilities and third party investors 2019 interests included in the equity section as noncontrolling interests .
neither creditors nor equity investors in the lihtc investments have any recourse to our general credit .
the consolidated aggregate assets and liabilities of these lihtc investments are provided in the consolidated vies 2013 pnc is primary beneficiary table and reflected in the 201cother 201d business segment .
we also have lihtc investments in which we are not the primary beneficiary , but are considered to have a significant variable interest based on our interests in the partnership/llc .
these investments are disclosed in the non-consolidated vies 2013 significant variable interests table .
the table also reflects our maximum exposure to loss .
our maximum exposure to loss is equal to our legally binding equity commitments adjusted for recorded impairment and partnership results .
we use the equity and cost methods to account for our investment in these entities with the investments reflected in equity investments on our consolidated balance sheet .
in addition , we increase our recognized investments and recognize a liability for all legally binding unfunded equity commitments .
these liabilities are reflected in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .
credit risk transfer transaction national city bank , ( a former pnc subsidiary which merged into pnc bank , n.a .
in november 2009 ) sponsored a special purpose entity ( spe ) and concurrently entered into a credit risk transfer agreement with an independent third party to mitigate credit losses on a pool of nonconforming mortgage loans originated by its former first franklin business unit .
the spe was formed with a small equity contribution and was structured as a bankruptcy-remote entity so that its creditors have no recourse to us .
in exchange for a perfected security interest in the cash flows of the nonconforming mortgage loans , the spe issued to us asset-backed securities in the form of senior , mezzanine , and subordinated equity notes .
the spe was deemed to be a vie as its equity was not sufficient to finance its activities .
we were determined to be the primary beneficiary of the spe as we would absorb the majority of the expected losses of the spe through our holding of the asset-backed securities .
accordingly , this spe was consolidated and all of the entity 2019s assets , liabilities , and .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is it in 2008?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the aaa interest rate in 2009?
[Turn 2] what is it in 2008?

Pre-table text:
market street commitments by credit rating ( a ) december 31 , december 31 .

Table:
	december 31 2009	december 312008
aaa/aaa	14% ( 14 % )	19% ( 19 % )
aa/aa	50	6
a/a	34	72
bbb/baa	2	3
total	100% ( 100 % )	100% ( 100 % )

Post-table text:
( a ) the majority of our facilities are not explicitly rated by the rating agencies .
all facilities are structured to meet rating agency standards for applicable rating levels .
we evaluated the design of market street , its capital structure , the note , and relationships among the variable interest holders .
based on this analysis and under accounting guidance effective during 2009 and 2008 , we are not the primary beneficiary and therefore the assets and liabilities of market street are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .
we considered changes to the variable interest holders ( such as new expected loss note investors and changes to program- level credit enhancement providers ) , terms of expected loss notes , and new types of risks related to market street as reconsideration events .
we reviewed the activities of market street on at least a quarterly basis to determine if a reconsideration event has occurred .
tax credit investments we make certain equity investments in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies ( llcs ) that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the low income housing tax credit ( lihtc ) pursuant to sections 42 and 47 of the internal revenue code .
the purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital , to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings and to assist us in achieving goals associated with the community reinvestment act .
the primary activities of the investments include the identification , development and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants .
generally , these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity .
we typically invest in these partnerships as a limited partner or non-managing member .
also , we are a national syndicator of affordable housing equity ( together with the investments described above , the 201clihtc investments 201d ) .
in these syndication transactions , we create funds in which our subsidiaries are the general partner or managing member and sell limited partnership or non-managing member interests to third parties , and in some cases may also purchase a limited partnership or non-managing member interest in the fund .
the purpose of this business is to generate income from the syndication of these funds , generate servicing fees by managing the funds , and earn tax credits to reduce our tax liability .
general partner or managing member activities include selecting , evaluating , structuring , negotiating , and closing the fund investments in operating limited partnerships , as well as oversight of the ongoing operations of the fund portfolio .
we evaluate our interests and third party interests in the limited partnerships/llcs in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary .
the primary beneficiary determination is based on which party absorbs a majority of the variability .
the primary sources of variability in lihtc investments are the tax credits , tax benefits due to passive losses on the investments and development and operating cash flows .
we have consolidated lihtc investments in which we absorb a majority of the variability and thus are considered the primary beneficiary .
the assets are primarily included in equity investments and other assets on our consolidated balance sheet with the liabilities classified in other liabilities and third party investors 2019 interests included in the equity section as noncontrolling interests .
neither creditors nor equity investors in the lihtc investments have any recourse to our general credit .
the consolidated aggregate assets and liabilities of these lihtc investments are provided in the consolidated vies 2013 pnc is primary beneficiary table and reflected in the 201cother 201d business segment .
we also have lihtc investments in which we are not the primary beneficiary , but are considered to have a significant variable interest based on our interests in the partnership/llc .
these investments are disclosed in the non-consolidated vies 2013 significant variable interests table .
the table also reflects our maximum exposure to loss .
our maximum exposure to loss is equal to our legally binding equity commitments adjusted for recorded impairment and partnership results .
we use the equity and cost methods to account for our investment in these entities with the investments reflected in equity investments on our consolidated balance sheet .
in addition , we increase our recognized investments and recognize a liability for all legally binding unfunded equity commitments .
these liabilities are reflected in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .
credit risk transfer transaction national city bank , ( a former pnc subsidiary which merged into pnc bank , n.a .
in november 2009 ) sponsored a special purpose entity ( spe ) and concurrently entered into a credit risk transfer agreement with an independent third party to mitigate credit losses on a pool of nonconforming mortgage loans originated by its former first franklin business unit .
the spe was formed with a small equity contribution and was structured as a bankruptcy-remote entity so that its creditors have no recourse to us .
in exchange for a perfected security interest in the cash flows of the nonconforming mortgage loans , the spe issued to us asset-backed securities in the form of senior , mezzanine , and subordinated equity notes .
the spe was deemed to be a vie as its equity was not sufficient to finance its activities .
we were determined to be the primary beneficiary of the spe as we would absorb the majority of the expected losses of the spe through our holding of the asset-backed securities .
accordingly , this spe was consolidated and all of the entity 2019s assets , liabilities , and .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the sum?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the aaa interest rate in 2009?
[Turn 2] what is it in 2008?
[Turn 3] what is the sum?

Pre-table text:
market street commitments by credit rating ( a ) december 31 , december 31 .

Table:
	december 31 2009	december 312008
aaa/aaa	14% ( 14 % )	19% ( 19 % )
aa/aa	50	6
a/a	34	72
bbb/baa	2	3
total	100% ( 100 % )	100% ( 100 % )

Post-table text:
( a ) the majority of our facilities are not explicitly rated by the rating agencies .
all facilities are structured to meet rating agency standards for applicable rating levels .
we evaluated the design of market street , its capital structure , the note , and relationships among the variable interest holders .
based on this analysis and under accounting guidance effective during 2009 and 2008 , we are not the primary beneficiary and therefore the assets and liabilities of market street are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .
we considered changes to the variable interest holders ( such as new expected loss note investors and changes to program- level credit enhancement providers ) , terms of expected loss notes , and new types of risks related to market street as reconsideration events .
we reviewed the activities of market street on at least a quarterly basis to determine if a reconsideration event has occurred .
tax credit investments we make certain equity investments in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies ( llcs ) that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the low income housing tax credit ( lihtc ) pursuant to sections 42 and 47 of the internal revenue code .
the purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital , to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings and to assist us in achieving goals associated with the community reinvestment act .
the primary activities of the investments include the identification , development and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants .
generally , these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity .
we typically invest in these partnerships as a limited partner or non-managing member .
also , we are a national syndicator of affordable housing equity ( together with the investments described above , the 201clihtc investments 201d ) .
in these syndication transactions , we create funds in which our subsidiaries are the general partner or managing member and sell limited partnership or non-managing member interests to third parties , and in some cases may also purchase a limited partnership or non-managing member interest in the fund .
the purpose of this business is to generate income from the syndication of these funds , generate servicing fees by managing the funds , and earn tax credits to reduce our tax liability .
general partner or managing member activities include selecting , evaluating , structuring , negotiating , and closing the fund investments in operating limited partnerships , as well as oversight of the ongoing operations of the fund portfolio .
we evaluate our interests and third party interests in the limited partnerships/llcs in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary .
the primary beneficiary determination is based on which party absorbs a majority of the variability .
the primary sources of variability in lihtc investments are the tax credits , tax benefits due to passive losses on the investments and development and operating cash flows .
we have consolidated lihtc investments in which we absorb a majority of the variability and thus are considered the primary beneficiary .
the assets are primarily included in equity investments and other assets on our consolidated balance sheet with the liabilities classified in other liabilities and third party investors 2019 interests included in the equity section as noncontrolling interests .
neither creditors nor equity investors in the lihtc investments have any recourse to our general credit .
the consolidated aggregate assets and liabilities of these lihtc investments are provided in the consolidated vies 2013 pnc is primary beneficiary table and reflected in the 201cother 201d business segment .
we also have lihtc investments in which we are not the primary beneficiary , but are considered to have a significant variable interest based on our interests in the partnership/llc .
these investments are disclosed in the non-consolidated vies 2013 significant variable interests table .
the table also reflects our maximum exposure to loss .
our maximum exposure to loss is equal to our legally binding equity commitments adjusted for recorded impairment and partnership results .
we use the equity and cost methods to account for our investment in these entities with the investments reflected in equity investments on our consolidated balance sheet .
in addition , we increase our recognized investments and recognize a liability for all legally binding unfunded equity commitments .
these liabilities are reflected in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .
credit risk transfer transaction national city bank , ( a former pnc subsidiary which merged into pnc bank , n.a .
in november 2009 ) sponsored a special purpose entity ( spe ) and concurrently entered into a credit risk transfer agreement with an independent third party to mitigate credit losses on a pool of nonconforming mortgage loans originated by its former first franklin business unit .
the spe was formed with a small equity contribution and was structured as a bankruptcy-remote entity so that its creditors have no recourse to us .
in exchange for a perfected security interest in the cash flows of the nonconforming mortgage loans , the spe issued to us asset-backed securities in the form of senior , mezzanine , and subordinated equity notes .
the spe was deemed to be a vie as its equity was not sufficient to finance its activities .
we were determined to be the primary beneficiary of the spe as we would absorb the majority of the expected losses of the spe through our holding of the asset-backed securities .
accordingly , this spe was consolidated and all of the entity 2019s assets , liabilities , and .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the average per year?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the aaa interest rate in 2009?
[Turn 2] what is it in 2008?
[Turn 3] what is the sum?
[Turn 4] what is the average per year?

Pre-table text:
market street commitments by credit rating ( a ) december 31 , december 31 .

Table:
	december 31 2009	december 312008
aaa/aaa	14% ( 14 % )	19% ( 19 % )
aa/aa	50	6
a/a	34	72
bbb/baa	2	3
total	100% ( 100 % )	100% ( 100 % )

Post-table text:
( a ) the majority of our facilities are not explicitly rated by the rating agencies .
all facilities are structured to meet rating agency standards for applicable rating levels .
we evaluated the design of market street , its capital structure , the note , and relationships among the variable interest holders .
based on this analysis and under accounting guidance effective during 2009 and 2008 , we are not the primary beneficiary and therefore the assets and liabilities of market street are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .
we considered changes to the variable interest holders ( such as new expected loss note investors and changes to program- level credit enhancement providers ) , terms of expected loss notes , and new types of risks related to market street as reconsideration events .
we reviewed the activities of market street on at least a quarterly basis to determine if a reconsideration event has occurred .
tax credit investments we make certain equity investments in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies ( llcs ) that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the low income housing tax credit ( lihtc ) pursuant to sections 42 and 47 of the internal revenue code .
the purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital , to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings and to assist us in achieving goals associated with the community reinvestment act .
the primary activities of the investments include the identification , development and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants .
generally , these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity .
we typically invest in these partnerships as a limited partner or non-managing member .
also , we are a national syndicator of affordable housing equity ( together with the investments described above , the 201clihtc investments 201d ) .
in these syndication transactions , we create funds in which our subsidiaries are the general partner or managing member and sell limited partnership or non-managing member interests to third parties , and in some cases may also purchase a limited partnership or non-managing member interest in the fund .
the purpose of this business is to generate income from the syndication of these funds , generate servicing fees by managing the funds , and earn tax credits to reduce our tax liability .
general partner or managing member activities include selecting , evaluating , structuring , negotiating , and closing the fund investments in operating limited partnerships , as well as oversight of the ongoing operations of the fund portfolio .
we evaluate our interests and third party interests in the limited partnerships/llcs in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary .
the primary beneficiary determination is based on which party absorbs a majority of the variability .
the primary sources of variability in lihtc investments are the tax credits , tax benefits due to passive losses on the investments and development and operating cash flows .
we have consolidated lihtc investments in which we absorb a majority of the variability and thus are considered the primary beneficiary .
the assets are primarily included in equity investments and other assets on our consolidated balance sheet with the liabilities classified in other liabilities and third party investors 2019 interests included in the equity section as noncontrolling interests .
neither creditors nor equity investors in the lihtc investments have any recourse to our general credit .
the consolidated aggregate assets and liabilities of these lihtc investments are provided in the consolidated vies 2013 pnc is primary beneficiary table and reflected in the 201cother 201d business segment .
we also have lihtc investments in which we are not the primary beneficiary , but are considered to have a significant variable interest based on our interests in the partnership/llc .
these investments are disclosed in the non-consolidated vies 2013 significant variable interests table .
the table also reflects our maximum exposure to loss .
our maximum exposure to loss is equal to our legally binding equity commitments adjusted for recorded impairment and partnership results .
we use the equity and cost methods to account for our investment in these entities with the investments reflected in equity investments on our consolidated balance sheet .
in addition , we increase our recognized investments and recognize a liability for all legally binding unfunded equity commitments .
these liabilities are reflected in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .
credit risk transfer transaction national city bank , ( a former pnc subsidiary which merged into pnc bank , n.a .
in november 2009 ) sponsored a special purpose entity ( spe ) and concurrently entered into a credit risk transfer agreement with an independent third party to mitigate credit losses on a pool of nonconforming mortgage loans originated by its former first franklin business unit .
the spe was formed with a small equity contribution and was structured as a bankruptcy-remote entity so that its creditors have no recourse to us .
in exchange for a perfected security interest in the cash flows of the nonconforming mortgage loans , the spe issued to us asset-backed securities in the form of senior , mezzanine , and subordinated equity notes .
the spe was deemed to be a vie as its equity was not sufficient to finance its activities .
we were determined to be the primary beneficiary of the spe as we would absorb the majority of the expected losses of the spe through our holding of the asset-backed securities .
accordingly , this spe was consolidated and all of the entity 2019s assets , liabilities , and .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the value of the s&p 500 index on january 3, 2009 less it at the end of 2006?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of the s&p 500 index on january 3, 2009 less it at the end of 2006?

Pre-table text:
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index .
the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .
the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .
comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 .

Table:
company/index	december 30 2006	december 29 2007	january 3 2009	january 2 2010	january 1 2011	december 31 2011
advance auto parts	$ 100.00	$ 108.00	$ 97.26	$ 116.01	$ 190.41	$ 201.18
s&p 500 index	100.00	104.24	65.70	78.62	88.67	88.67
s&p retail index	100.00	82.15	58.29	82.36	101.84	104.81

Post-table text:
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index .
the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .
the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .
comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is that divided by 100?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of the s&p 500 index on january 3, 2009 less it at the end of 2006?
[Turn 2] what is that divided by 100?

Pre-table text:
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index .
the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .
the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .
comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 .

Table:
company/index	december 30 2006	december 29 2007	january 3 2009	january 2 2010	january 1 2011	december 31 2011
advance auto parts	$ 100.00	$ 108.00	$ 97.26	$ 116.01	$ 190.41	$ 201.18
s&p 500 index	100.00	104.24	65.70	78.62	88.67	88.67
s&p retail index	100.00	82.15	58.29	82.36	101.84	104.81

Post-table text:
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index .
the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .
the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .
comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the change in total net goodwill between 2010 and 2011?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in total net goodwill between 2010 and 2011?

Pre-table text:
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) h .
goodwill and other intangible assets ( continued ) goodwill at december 31 , accumulated impairment losses goodwill at december 31 , 2010 additions ( a ) discontinued operations ( b ) pre-tax impairment charge other ( c ) goodwill at december 31 , cabinets and related products .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 587 $ ( 364 ) $ 223 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ ( 44 ) $ 2 $ 181 .

Table:
	gross goodwill at december 31 2010	accumulated impairment losses	net goodwill at december 31 2010	additions ( a )	discontinued operations ( b )	pre-tax impairment charge	other ( c )	net goodwill at december 31 2011
cabinets and related products	$ 587	$ -364 ( 364 )	$ 223	$ 2014	$ 2014	$ -44 ( 44 )	$ 2	$ 181
plumbing products	536	-340 ( 340 )	196	9	2014	2014	-4 ( 4 )	201
installation and other services	1819	-762 ( 762 )	1057	2014	-13 ( 13 )	2014	2014	1044
decorative architectural products	294	2014	294	2014	2014	-75 ( 75 )	2014	219
other specialty products	980	-367 ( 367 )	613	2014	2014	-367 ( 367 )	2014	246
total	$ 4216	$ -1833 ( 1833 )	$ 2383	$ 9	$ -13 ( 13 )	$ -486 ( 486 )	$ -2 ( 2 )	$ 1891

Post-table text:
( a ) additions include acquisitions .
( b ) during 2011 , the company reclassified the goodwill related to the business units held for sale .
subsequent to the reclassification , the company recognized a charge for those business units expected to be divested at a loss ; the charge included a write-down of goodwill of $ 13 million .
( c ) other principally includes the effect of foreign currency translation and purchase price adjustments related to prior-year acquisitions .
in the fourth quarters of 2012 and 2011 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets .
the impairment test in 2012 indicated there was no impairment of goodwill for any of the company 2019s reporting units .
the impairment test in 2011 indicated that goodwill recorded for certain of the company 2019s reporting units was impaired .
the company recognized the non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges , in continuing operations , for goodwill of $ 486 million ( $ 330 million , after tax ) for 2011 .
in 2011 , the pre-tax impairment charge in the cabinets and related products segment relates to the european ready-to- assemble cabinet manufacturer and reflects the declining demand for certain products , as well as decreased operating margins .
the pre-tax impairment charge in the decorative architectural products segment relates to the builders 2019 hardware business and reflects increasing competitive conditions for that business .
the pre-tax impairment charge in the other specialty products segment relates to the north american window and door business and reflects the continuing weak level of new home construction activity in the western u.s. , the reduced levels of repair and remodel activity and the expectation that recovery in these segments will be modestly slower than anticipated .
the company then assessed the long-lived assets associated with these business units and determined no impairment was necessary at december 31 , 2011 .
other indefinite-lived intangible assets were $ 132 million and $ 174 million at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and principally included registered trademarks .
in 2012 and 2011 , the impairment test indicated that the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the other specialty products segment and the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the plumbing products segment ( 2011 only ) were impaired due to changes in the long-term outlook for the business units .
the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite- lived intangible assets of $ 42 million ( $ 27 million , after tax ) and $ 8 million ( $ 5 million , after tax ) in 2012 and 2011 , respectively .
in 2010 , the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite-lived intangible assets of $ 10 million ( $ 6 million after tax ) related to the installation and other services segment ( $ 9 million pre-tax ) and the plumbing products segment ( $ 1 million pre-tax ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what is this change as a percent of that net goodwill in 2010?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in total net goodwill between 2010 and 2011?
[Turn 2] and what is this change as a percent of that net goodwill in 2010?

Pre-table text:
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) h .
goodwill and other intangible assets ( continued ) goodwill at december 31 , accumulated impairment losses goodwill at december 31 , 2010 additions ( a ) discontinued operations ( b ) pre-tax impairment charge other ( c ) goodwill at december 31 , cabinets and related products .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 587 $ ( 364 ) $ 223 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ ( 44 ) $ 2 $ 181 .

Table:
	gross goodwill at december 31 2010	accumulated impairment losses	net goodwill at december 31 2010	additions ( a )	discontinued operations ( b )	pre-tax impairment charge	other ( c )	net goodwill at december 31 2011
cabinets and related products	$ 587	$ -364 ( 364 )	$ 223	$ 2014	$ 2014	$ -44 ( 44 )	$ 2	$ 181
plumbing products	536	-340 ( 340 )	196	9	2014	2014	-4 ( 4 )	201
installation and other services	1819	-762 ( 762 )	1057	2014	-13 ( 13 )	2014	2014	1044
decorative architectural products	294	2014	294	2014	2014	-75 ( 75 )	2014	219
other specialty products	980	-367 ( 367 )	613	2014	2014	-367 ( 367 )	2014	246
total	$ 4216	$ -1833 ( 1833 )	$ 2383	$ 9	$ -13 ( 13 )	$ -486 ( 486 )	$ -2 ( 2 )	$ 1891

Post-table text:
( a ) additions include acquisitions .
( b ) during 2011 , the company reclassified the goodwill related to the business units held for sale .
subsequent to the reclassification , the company recognized a charge for those business units expected to be divested at a loss ; the charge included a write-down of goodwill of $ 13 million .
( c ) other principally includes the effect of foreign currency translation and purchase price adjustments related to prior-year acquisitions .
in the fourth quarters of 2012 and 2011 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets .
the impairment test in 2012 indicated there was no impairment of goodwill for any of the company 2019s reporting units .
the impairment test in 2011 indicated that goodwill recorded for certain of the company 2019s reporting units was impaired .
the company recognized the non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges , in continuing operations , for goodwill of $ 486 million ( $ 330 million , after tax ) for 2011 .
in 2011 , the pre-tax impairment charge in the cabinets and related products segment relates to the european ready-to- assemble cabinet manufacturer and reflects the declining demand for certain products , as well as decreased operating margins .
the pre-tax impairment charge in the decorative architectural products segment relates to the builders 2019 hardware business and reflects increasing competitive conditions for that business .
the pre-tax impairment charge in the other specialty products segment relates to the north american window and door business and reflects the continuing weak level of new home construction activity in the western u.s. , the reduced levels of repair and remodel activity and the expectation that recovery in these segments will be modestly slower than anticipated .
the company then assessed the long-lived assets associated with these business units and determined no impairment was necessary at december 31 , 2011 .
other indefinite-lived intangible assets were $ 132 million and $ 174 million at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and principally included registered trademarks .
in 2012 and 2011 , the impairment test indicated that the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the other specialty products segment and the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the plumbing products segment ( 2011 only ) were impaired due to changes in the long-term outlook for the business units .
the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite- lived intangible assets of $ 42 million ( $ 27 million , after tax ) and $ 8 million ( $ 5 million , after tax ) in 2012 and 2011 , respectively .
in 2010 , the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite-lived intangible assets of $ 10 million ( $ 6 million after tax ) related to the installation and other services segment ( $ 9 million pre-tax ) and the plumbing products segment ( $ 1 million pre-tax ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and in that last year of 2011, what percentage of that goodwill was due to cabinets and related products?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in total net goodwill between 2010 and 2011?
[Turn 2] and what is this change as a percent of that net goodwill in 2010?
[Turn 3] and in that last year of 2011, what percentage of that goodwill was due to cabinets and related products?

Pre-table text:
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) h .
goodwill and other intangible assets ( continued ) goodwill at december 31 , accumulated impairment losses goodwill at december 31 , 2010 additions ( a ) discontinued operations ( b ) pre-tax impairment charge other ( c ) goodwill at december 31 , cabinets and related products .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 587 $ ( 364 ) $ 223 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ ( 44 ) $ 2 $ 181 .

Table:
	gross goodwill at december 31 2010	accumulated impairment losses	net goodwill at december 31 2010	additions ( a )	discontinued operations ( b )	pre-tax impairment charge	other ( c )	net goodwill at december 31 2011
cabinets and related products	$ 587	$ -364 ( 364 )	$ 223	$ 2014	$ 2014	$ -44 ( 44 )	$ 2	$ 181
plumbing products	536	-340 ( 340 )	196	9	2014	2014	-4 ( 4 )	201
installation and other services	1819	-762 ( 762 )	1057	2014	-13 ( 13 )	2014	2014	1044
decorative architectural products	294	2014	294	2014	2014	-75 ( 75 )	2014	219
other specialty products	980	-367 ( 367 )	613	2014	2014	-367 ( 367 )	2014	246
total	$ 4216	$ -1833 ( 1833 )	$ 2383	$ 9	$ -13 ( 13 )	$ -486 ( 486 )	$ -2 ( 2 )	$ 1891

Post-table text:
( a ) additions include acquisitions .
( b ) during 2011 , the company reclassified the goodwill related to the business units held for sale .
subsequent to the reclassification , the company recognized a charge for those business units expected to be divested at a loss ; the charge included a write-down of goodwill of $ 13 million .
( c ) other principally includes the effect of foreign currency translation and purchase price adjustments related to prior-year acquisitions .
in the fourth quarters of 2012 and 2011 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets .
the impairment test in 2012 indicated there was no impairment of goodwill for any of the company 2019s reporting units .
the impairment test in 2011 indicated that goodwill recorded for certain of the company 2019s reporting units was impaired .
the company recognized the non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges , in continuing operations , for goodwill of $ 486 million ( $ 330 million , after tax ) for 2011 .
in 2011 , the pre-tax impairment charge in the cabinets and related products segment relates to the european ready-to- assemble cabinet manufacturer and reflects the declining demand for certain products , as well as decreased operating margins .
the pre-tax impairment charge in the decorative architectural products segment relates to the builders 2019 hardware business and reflects increasing competitive conditions for that business .
the pre-tax impairment charge in the other specialty products segment relates to the north american window and door business and reflects the continuing weak level of new home construction activity in the western u.s. , the reduced levels of repair and remodel activity and the expectation that recovery in these segments will be modestly slower than anticipated .
the company then assessed the long-lived assets associated with these business units and determined no impairment was necessary at december 31 , 2011 .
other indefinite-lived intangible assets were $ 132 million and $ 174 million at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and principally included registered trademarks .
in 2012 and 2011 , the impairment test indicated that the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the other specialty products segment and the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the plumbing products segment ( 2011 only ) were impaired due to changes in the long-term outlook for the business units .
the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite- lived intangible assets of $ 42 million ( $ 27 million , after tax ) and $ 8 million ( $ 5 million , after tax ) in 2012 and 2011 , respectively .
in 2010 , the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite-lived intangible assets of $ 10 million ( $ 6 million after tax ) related to the installation and other services segment ( $ 9 million pre-tax ) and the plumbing products segment ( $ 1 million pre-tax ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the rent expense in 2007?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the rent expense in 2007?

Pre-table text:
company has a contingent liability relating to proper disposition of these balances , which amounted to $ 1926.8 mil- lion at december 31 , 2007 .
as a result of holding these customers 2019 assets in escrow , the company has ongoing programs for realizing economic benefits during the year through favorable borrowing and vendor arrangements with various banks .
there were no loans outstanding as of december 31 , 2007 and these balances were invested in short term , high grade investments that minimize the risk to principal .
leases the company leases certain of its property under leases which expire at various dates .
several of these agreements include escalation clauses and provide for purchases and renewal options for periods ranging from one to five years .
future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2012 , and thereafter in the aggregate , are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
2008	83382
2009	63060
2010	35269
2011	21598
2012	14860
thereafter	30869
total	$ 249038

Post-table text:
in addition , the company has operating lease commitments relating to office equipment and computer hardware with annual lease payments of approximately $ 16.0 million per year which renew on a short-term basis .
rent expense incurred under all operating leases during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 106.4 million , $ 81.5 million and $ 61.1 million , respectively .
data processing and maintenance services agreements .
the company has agreements with various vendors , which expire between 2008 and 2017 , for portions of its computer data processing operations and related functions .
the company 2019s estimated aggregate contractual obligation remaining under these agreements was approximately $ 888.3 million as of december 31 , 2007 .
however , this amount could be more or less depending on various factors such as the inflation rate , the introduction of significant new technologies , or changes in the company 2019s data processing needs .
( 17 ) employee benefit plans stock purchase plan prior to the certegy merger ( note 6 ) , fis employees participated in the fidelity national financial , inc .
employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) .
subsequent to the certegy merger , the company instituted its own plan with the same terms as the fidelity national financial , inc .
plan .
under the terms of both plans and subsequent amendments , eligible employees may voluntarily purchase , at current market prices , shares of fnf 2019s ( prior to the certegy merger ) or fis 2019s ( post certegy merger ) common stock through payroll deductions .
pursuant to the espp , employees may contribute an amount between 3% ( 3 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of their base salary and certain commissions .
shares purchased are allocated to employees based upon their contributions .
the company contributes varying matching amounts as specified in the espp .
the company recorded an expense of $ 15.2 million , $ 13.1 million and $ 11.1 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 relating to the participation of fis employees in the espp .
fidelity national information services , inc .
and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was it in 2006?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the rent expense in 2007?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2006?

Pre-table text:
company has a contingent liability relating to proper disposition of these balances , which amounted to $ 1926.8 mil- lion at december 31 , 2007 .
as a result of holding these customers 2019 assets in escrow , the company has ongoing programs for realizing economic benefits during the year through favorable borrowing and vendor arrangements with various banks .
there were no loans outstanding as of december 31 , 2007 and these balances were invested in short term , high grade investments that minimize the risk to principal .
leases the company leases certain of its property under leases which expire at various dates .
several of these agreements include escalation clauses and provide for purchases and renewal options for periods ranging from one to five years .
future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2012 , and thereafter in the aggregate , are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
2008	83382
2009	63060
2010	35269
2011	21598
2012	14860
thereafter	30869
total	$ 249038

Post-table text:
in addition , the company has operating lease commitments relating to office equipment and computer hardware with annual lease payments of approximately $ 16.0 million per year which renew on a short-term basis .
rent expense incurred under all operating leases during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 106.4 million , $ 81.5 million and $ 61.1 million , respectively .
data processing and maintenance services agreements .
the company has agreements with various vendors , which expire between 2008 and 2017 , for portions of its computer data processing operations and related functions .
the company 2019s estimated aggregate contractual obligation remaining under these agreements was approximately $ 888.3 million as of december 31 , 2007 .
however , this amount could be more or less depending on various factors such as the inflation rate , the introduction of significant new technologies , or changes in the company 2019s data processing needs .
( 17 ) employee benefit plans stock purchase plan prior to the certegy merger ( note 6 ) , fis employees participated in the fidelity national financial , inc .
employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) .
subsequent to the certegy merger , the company instituted its own plan with the same terms as the fidelity national financial , inc .
plan .
under the terms of both plans and subsequent amendments , eligible employees may voluntarily purchase , at current market prices , shares of fnf 2019s ( prior to the certegy merger ) or fis 2019s ( post certegy merger ) common stock through payroll deductions .
pursuant to the espp , employees may contribute an amount between 3% ( 3 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of their base salary and certain commissions .
shares purchased are allocated to employees based upon their contributions .
the company contributes varying matching amounts as specified in the espp .
the company recorded an expense of $ 15.2 million , $ 13.1 million and $ 11.1 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 relating to the participation of fis employees in the espp .
fidelity national information services , inc .
and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was, then, the change over the year?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the rent expense in 2007?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2006?
[Turn 3] what was, then, the change over the year?

Pre-table text:
company has a contingent liability relating to proper disposition of these balances , which amounted to $ 1926.8 mil- lion at december 31 , 2007 .
as a result of holding these customers 2019 assets in escrow , the company has ongoing programs for realizing economic benefits during the year through favorable borrowing and vendor arrangements with various banks .
there were no loans outstanding as of december 31 , 2007 and these balances were invested in short term , high grade investments that minimize the risk to principal .
leases the company leases certain of its property under leases which expire at various dates .
several of these agreements include escalation clauses and provide for purchases and renewal options for periods ranging from one to five years .
future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2012 , and thereafter in the aggregate , are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
2008	83382
2009	63060
2010	35269
2011	21598
2012	14860
thereafter	30869
total	$ 249038

Post-table text:
in addition , the company has operating lease commitments relating to office equipment and computer hardware with annual lease payments of approximately $ 16.0 million per year which renew on a short-term basis .
rent expense incurred under all operating leases during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 106.4 million , $ 81.5 million and $ 61.1 million , respectively .
data processing and maintenance services agreements .
the company has agreements with various vendors , which expire between 2008 and 2017 , for portions of its computer data processing operations and related functions .
the company 2019s estimated aggregate contractual obligation remaining under these agreements was approximately $ 888.3 million as of december 31 , 2007 .
however , this amount could be more or less depending on various factors such as the inflation rate , the introduction of significant new technologies , or changes in the company 2019s data processing needs .
( 17 ) employee benefit plans stock purchase plan prior to the certegy merger ( note 6 ) , fis employees participated in the fidelity national financial , inc .
employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) .
subsequent to the certegy merger , the company instituted its own plan with the same terms as the fidelity national financial , inc .
plan .
under the terms of both plans and subsequent amendments , eligible employees may voluntarily purchase , at current market prices , shares of fnf 2019s ( prior to the certegy merger ) or fis 2019s ( post certegy merger ) common stock through payroll deductions .
pursuant to the espp , employees may contribute an amount between 3% ( 3 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of their base salary and certain commissions .
shares purchased are allocated to employees based upon their contributions .
the company contributes varying matching amounts as specified in the espp .
the company recorded an expense of $ 15.2 million , $ 13.1 million and $ 11.1 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 relating to the participation of fis employees in the espp .
fidelity national information services , inc .
and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the rent expense in 2006?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the rent expense in 2007?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2006?
[Turn 3] what was, then, the change over the year?
[Turn 4] what was the rent expense in 2006?

Pre-table text:
company has a contingent liability relating to proper disposition of these balances , which amounted to $ 1926.8 mil- lion at december 31 , 2007 .
as a result of holding these customers 2019 assets in escrow , the company has ongoing programs for realizing economic benefits during the year through favorable borrowing and vendor arrangements with various banks .
there were no loans outstanding as of december 31 , 2007 and these balances were invested in short term , high grade investments that minimize the risk to principal .
leases the company leases certain of its property under leases which expire at various dates .
several of these agreements include escalation clauses and provide for purchases and renewal options for periods ranging from one to five years .
future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2012 , and thereafter in the aggregate , are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
2008	83382
2009	63060
2010	35269
2011	21598
2012	14860
thereafter	30869
total	$ 249038

Post-table text:
in addition , the company has operating lease commitments relating to office equipment and computer hardware with annual lease payments of approximately $ 16.0 million per year which renew on a short-term basis .
rent expense incurred under all operating leases during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 106.4 million , $ 81.5 million and $ 61.1 million , respectively .
data processing and maintenance services agreements .
the company has agreements with various vendors , which expire between 2008 and 2017 , for portions of its computer data processing operations and related functions .
the company 2019s estimated aggregate contractual obligation remaining under these agreements was approximately $ 888.3 million as of december 31 , 2007 .
however , this amount could be more or less depending on various factors such as the inflation rate , the introduction of significant new technologies , or changes in the company 2019s data processing needs .
( 17 ) employee benefit plans stock purchase plan prior to the certegy merger ( note 6 ) , fis employees participated in the fidelity national financial , inc .
employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) .
subsequent to the certegy merger , the company instituted its own plan with the same terms as the fidelity national financial , inc .
plan .
under the terms of both plans and subsequent amendments , eligible employees may voluntarily purchase , at current market prices , shares of fnf 2019s ( prior to the certegy merger ) or fis 2019s ( post certegy merger ) common stock through payroll deductions .
pursuant to the espp , employees may contribute an amount between 3% ( 3 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of their base salary and certain commissions .
shares purchased are allocated to employees based upon their contributions .
the company contributes varying matching amounts as specified in the espp .
the company recorded an expense of $ 15.2 million , $ 13.1 million and $ 11.1 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 relating to the participation of fis employees in the espp .
fidelity national information services , inc .
and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2006 rent expense, in percentage?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the rent expense in 2007?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2006?
[Turn 3] what was, then, the change over the year?
[Turn 4] what was the rent expense in 2006?
[Turn 5] and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2006 rent expense, in percentage?

Pre-table text:
company has a contingent liability relating to proper disposition of these balances , which amounted to $ 1926.8 mil- lion at december 31 , 2007 .
as a result of holding these customers 2019 assets in escrow , the company has ongoing programs for realizing economic benefits during the year through favorable borrowing and vendor arrangements with various banks .
there were no loans outstanding as of december 31 , 2007 and these balances were invested in short term , high grade investments that minimize the risk to principal .
leases the company leases certain of its property under leases which expire at various dates .
several of these agreements include escalation clauses and provide for purchases and renewal options for periods ranging from one to five years .
future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2012 , and thereafter in the aggregate , are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
2008	83382
2009	63060
2010	35269
2011	21598
2012	14860
thereafter	30869
total	$ 249038

Post-table text:
in addition , the company has operating lease commitments relating to office equipment and computer hardware with annual lease payments of approximately $ 16.0 million per year which renew on a short-term basis .
rent expense incurred under all operating leases during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 106.4 million , $ 81.5 million and $ 61.1 million , respectively .
data processing and maintenance services agreements .
the company has agreements with various vendors , which expire between 2008 and 2017 , for portions of its computer data processing operations and related functions .
the company 2019s estimated aggregate contractual obligation remaining under these agreements was approximately $ 888.3 million as of december 31 , 2007 .
however , this amount could be more or less depending on various factors such as the inflation rate , the introduction of significant new technologies , or changes in the company 2019s data processing needs .
( 17 ) employee benefit plans stock purchase plan prior to the certegy merger ( note 6 ) , fis employees participated in the fidelity national financial , inc .
employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) .
subsequent to the certegy merger , the company instituted its own plan with the same terms as the fidelity national financial , inc .
plan .
under the terms of both plans and subsequent amendments , eligible employees may voluntarily purchase , at current market prices , shares of fnf 2019s ( prior to the certegy merger ) or fis 2019s ( post certegy merger ) common stock through payroll deductions .
pursuant to the espp , employees may contribute an amount between 3% ( 3 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of their base salary and certain commissions .
shares purchased are allocated to employees based upon their contributions .
the company contributes varying matching amounts as specified in the espp .
the company recorded an expense of $ 15.2 million , $ 13.1 million and $ 11.1 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 relating to the participation of fis employees in the espp .
fidelity national information services , inc .
and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what would be the change in the multi-currency line of credit if the potential increase was fulfilled?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what would be the change in the multi-currency line of credit if the potential increase was fulfilled?

Pre-table text:
2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts .
in the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation .
these assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights .
in addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm .
thereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package .
we would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit .
we maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing .
we have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion .
we may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms .
the credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit .
pledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s .
treasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs .
performance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line .
in addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default .
aggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit .
a defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm .
the following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) .
.
.
.
.
2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit .
( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms .
( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund .
( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .

Table:
( in millions )	cme clearingavailable assets
designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 )	$ 100.0
guaranty fund contributions ( 2 )	2899.5
assessment powers ( 3 )	7973.6
minimum total assets available for default ( 4 )	$ 10973.1

Post-table text:
2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts .
in the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation .
these assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights .
in addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm .
thereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package .
we would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit .
we maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing .
we have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion .
we may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms .
the credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit .
pledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s .
treasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs .
performance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line .
in addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default .
aggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit .
a defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm .
the following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) .
.
.
.
.
2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit .
( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms .
( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund .
( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.