[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the weighted average exercise price per share in 2007?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the weighted average exercise price per share in 2007?

Pre-table text:
stock-based awards under the plan stock options 2013 marathon grants stock options under the 2007 plan and previously granted options under the 2003 plan .
marathon 2019s stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant .
through 2004 , certain stock options were granted under the 2003 plan with a tandem stock appreciation right , which allows the recipient to instead elect to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock , as determined in accordance with the 2003 plan , over the option price of the shares .
in general , stock options granted under the 2007 plan and the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .
stock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted sars under the 2003 plan .
no stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan .
similar to stock options , stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price .
under the 2003 plan , certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options .
in general , sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .
stock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan .
no stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan .
beginning in 2005 , marathon discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grants cash-settled performance units to officers .
all stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited .
as a result , there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards .
restricted stock 2013 marathon grants restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan .
in 2005 , the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package .
the restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .
marathon also grants restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees ( 201crestricted stock awards 201d ) , based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes .
the restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .
prior to vesting , all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon .
the non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by marathon 2019s transfer agent .
common stock units 2013 marathon maintains an equity compensation program for its non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan .
all non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units , and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors .
when dividends are paid on marathon common stock , directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units .
stock-based compensation expense 2013 total employee stock-based compensation expense was $ 80 million , $ 83 million and $ 111 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .
the total related income tax benefits were $ 29 million , $ 31 million and $ 39 million .
in 2007 and 2006 , cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $ 27 million and $ 50 million .
tax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $ 30 million and $ 36 million .
cash settlements of stock option awards totaled $ 1 million and $ 3 million in 2007 and 2006 .
stock option awards granted 2013 during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , marathon granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees .
the weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions: .

Table:
	2007	2006	2005
weighted average exercise price per share	$ 60.94	$ 37.84	$ 25.14
expected annual dividends per share	$ 0.96	$ 0.80	$ 0.66
expected life in years	5.0	5.1	5.5
expected volatility	27% ( 27 % )	28% ( 28 % )	28% ( 28 % )
risk-free interest rate	4.1% ( 4.1 % )	5.0% ( 5.0 % )	3.8% ( 3.8 % )
weighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted	$ 17.24	$ 10.19	$ 6.15

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was it in 2005?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the weighted average exercise price per share in 2007?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2005?

Pre-table text:
stock-based awards under the plan stock options 2013 marathon grants stock options under the 2007 plan and previously granted options under the 2003 plan .
marathon 2019s stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant .
through 2004 , certain stock options were granted under the 2003 plan with a tandem stock appreciation right , which allows the recipient to instead elect to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock , as determined in accordance with the 2003 plan , over the option price of the shares .
in general , stock options granted under the 2007 plan and the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .
stock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted sars under the 2003 plan .
no stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan .
similar to stock options , stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price .
under the 2003 plan , certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options .
in general , sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .
stock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan .
no stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan .
beginning in 2005 , marathon discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grants cash-settled performance units to officers .
all stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited .
as a result , there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards .
restricted stock 2013 marathon grants restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan .
in 2005 , the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package .
the restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .
marathon also grants restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees ( 201crestricted stock awards 201d ) , based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes .
the restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .
prior to vesting , all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon .
the non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by marathon 2019s transfer agent .
common stock units 2013 marathon maintains an equity compensation program for its non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan .
all non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units , and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors .
when dividends are paid on marathon common stock , directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units .
stock-based compensation expense 2013 total employee stock-based compensation expense was $ 80 million , $ 83 million and $ 111 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .
the total related income tax benefits were $ 29 million , $ 31 million and $ 39 million .
in 2007 and 2006 , cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $ 27 million and $ 50 million .
tax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $ 30 million and $ 36 million .
cash settlements of stock option awards totaled $ 1 million and $ 3 million in 2007 and 2006 .
stock option awards granted 2013 during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , marathon granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees .
the weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions: .

Table:
	2007	2006	2005
weighted average exercise price per share	$ 60.94	$ 37.84	$ 25.14
expected annual dividends per share	$ 0.96	$ 0.80	$ 0.66
expected life in years	5.0	5.1	5.5
expected volatility	27% ( 27 % )	28% ( 28 % )	28% ( 28 % )
risk-free interest rate	4.1% ( 4.1 % )	5.0% ( 5.0 % )	3.8% ( 3.8 % )
weighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted	$ 17.24	$ 10.19	$ 6.15

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was, then, the change over the years?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the weighted average exercise price per share in 2007?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2005?
[Turn 3] what was, then, the change over the years?

Pre-table text:
stock-based awards under the plan stock options 2013 marathon grants stock options under the 2007 plan and previously granted options under the 2003 plan .
marathon 2019s stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant .
through 2004 , certain stock options were granted under the 2003 plan with a tandem stock appreciation right , which allows the recipient to instead elect to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock , as determined in accordance with the 2003 plan , over the option price of the shares .
in general , stock options granted under the 2007 plan and the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .
stock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted sars under the 2003 plan .
no stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan .
similar to stock options , stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price .
under the 2003 plan , certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options .
in general , sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .
stock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan .
no stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan .
beginning in 2005 , marathon discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grants cash-settled performance units to officers .
all stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited .
as a result , there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards .
restricted stock 2013 marathon grants restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan .
in 2005 , the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package .
the restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .
marathon also grants restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees ( 201crestricted stock awards 201d ) , based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes .
the restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .
prior to vesting , all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon .
the non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by marathon 2019s transfer agent .
common stock units 2013 marathon maintains an equity compensation program for its non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan .
all non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units , and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors .
when dividends are paid on marathon common stock , directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units .
stock-based compensation expense 2013 total employee stock-based compensation expense was $ 80 million , $ 83 million and $ 111 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .
the total related income tax benefits were $ 29 million , $ 31 million and $ 39 million .
in 2007 and 2006 , cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $ 27 million and $ 50 million .
tax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $ 30 million and $ 36 million .
cash settlements of stock option awards totaled $ 1 million and $ 3 million in 2007 and 2006 .
stock option awards granted 2013 during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , marathon granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees .
the weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions: .

Table:
	2007	2006	2005
weighted average exercise price per share	$ 60.94	$ 37.84	$ 25.14
expected annual dividends per share	$ 0.96	$ 0.80	$ 0.66
expected life in years	5.0	5.1	5.5
expected volatility	27% ( 27 % )	28% ( 28 % )	28% ( 28 % )
risk-free interest rate	4.1% ( 4.1 % )	5.0% ( 5.0 % )	3.8% ( 3.8 % )
weighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted	$ 17.24	$ 10.19	$ 6.15

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the weighted average exercise price per share in 2005?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the weighted average exercise price per share in 2007?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2005?
[Turn 3] what was, then, the change over the years?
[Turn 4] what was the weighted average exercise price per share in 2005?

Pre-table text:
stock-based awards under the plan stock options 2013 marathon grants stock options under the 2007 plan and previously granted options under the 2003 plan .
marathon 2019s stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant .
through 2004 , certain stock options were granted under the 2003 plan with a tandem stock appreciation right , which allows the recipient to instead elect to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock , as determined in accordance with the 2003 plan , over the option price of the shares .
in general , stock options granted under the 2007 plan and the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .
stock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted sars under the 2003 plan .
no stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan .
similar to stock options , stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price .
under the 2003 plan , certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options .
in general , sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .
stock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan .
no stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan .
beginning in 2005 , marathon discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grants cash-settled performance units to officers .
all stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited .
as a result , there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards .
restricted stock 2013 marathon grants restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan .
in 2005 , the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package .
the restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .
marathon also grants restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees ( 201crestricted stock awards 201d ) , based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes .
the restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .
prior to vesting , all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon .
the non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by marathon 2019s transfer agent .
common stock units 2013 marathon maintains an equity compensation program for its non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan .
all non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units , and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors .
when dividends are paid on marathon common stock , directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units .
stock-based compensation expense 2013 total employee stock-based compensation expense was $ 80 million , $ 83 million and $ 111 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .
the total related income tax benefits were $ 29 million , $ 31 million and $ 39 million .
in 2007 and 2006 , cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $ 27 million and $ 50 million .
tax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $ 30 million and $ 36 million .
cash settlements of stock option awards totaled $ 1 million and $ 3 million in 2007 and 2006 .
stock option awards granted 2013 during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , marathon granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees .
the weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions: .

Table:
	2007	2006	2005
weighted average exercise price per share	$ 60.94	$ 37.84	$ 25.14
expected annual dividends per share	$ 0.96	$ 0.80	$ 0.66
expected life in years	5.0	5.1	5.5
expected volatility	27% ( 27 % )	28% ( 28 % )	28% ( 28 % )
risk-free interest rate	4.1% ( 4.1 % )	5.0% ( 5.0 % )	3.8% ( 3.8 % )
weighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted	$ 17.24	$ 10.19	$ 6.15

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2005 weighted average exercise price?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the weighted average exercise price per share in 2007?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2005?
[Turn 3] what was, then, the change over the years?
[Turn 4] what was the weighted average exercise price per share in 2005?
[Turn 5] and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2005 weighted average exercise price?

Pre-table text:
stock-based awards under the plan stock options 2013 marathon grants stock options under the 2007 plan and previously granted options under the 2003 plan .
marathon 2019s stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant .
through 2004 , certain stock options were granted under the 2003 plan with a tandem stock appreciation right , which allows the recipient to instead elect to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock , as determined in accordance with the 2003 plan , over the option price of the shares .
in general , stock options granted under the 2007 plan and the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .
stock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted sars under the 2003 plan .
no stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan .
similar to stock options , stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price .
under the 2003 plan , certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options .
in general , sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .
stock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan .
no stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan .
beginning in 2005 , marathon discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grants cash-settled performance units to officers .
all stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited .
as a result , there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards .
restricted stock 2013 marathon grants restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan .
in 2005 , the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package .
the restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .
marathon also grants restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees ( 201crestricted stock awards 201d ) , based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes .
the restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .
prior to vesting , all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon .
the non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by marathon 2019s transfer agent .
common stock units 2013 marathon maintains an equity compensation program for its non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan .
all non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units , and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors .
when dividends are paid on marathon common stock , directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units .
stock-based compensation expense 2013 total employee stock-based compensation expense was $ 80 million , $ 83 million and $ 111 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .
the total related income tax benefits were $ 29 million , $ 31 million and $ 39 million .
in 2007 and 2006 , cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $ 27 million and $ 50 million .
tax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $ 30 million and $ 36 million .
cash settlements of stock option awards totaled $ 1 million and $ 3 million in 2007 and 2006 .
stock option awards granted 2013 during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , marathon granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees .
the weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions: .

Table:
	2007	2006	2005
weighted average exercise price per share	$ 60.94	$ 37.84	$ 25.14
expected annual dividends per share	$ 0.96	$ 0.80	$ 0.66
expected life in years	5.0	5.1	5.5
expected volatility	27% ( 27 % )	28% ( 28 % )	28% ( 28 % )
risk-free interest rate	4.1% ( 4.1 % )	5.0% ( 5.0 % )	3.8% ( 3.8 % )
weighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted	$ 17.24	$ 10.19	$ 6.15

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the change in the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes between 2016 and 2017?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes between 2016 and 2017?

Pre-table text:
as of december 31 , 2017 , the company had gross state income tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $ 20 million , which expire from 2018 through 2020 .
a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 16 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established related to these state income tax credit carry-forwards , with a valuation allowance of $ 7 million against such deferred tax asset as of december 31 , 2017 .
the company had a gross state net operating loss carry-forward of $ 39 million , which expires in 2027 .
a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 3 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established for the net operating loss carry-forward , with a full valuation allowance as of december 31 , 2017 .
other state and foreign net operating loss carry-forwards are separately and cumulatively immaterial to the company 2019s deferred tax balances and expire between 2026 and 2036 .
14 .
debt long-term debt consisted of the following: .

Table:
( $ in millions )	december 31 2017	december 31 2016
senior notes due december 15 2021 5.000% ( 5.000 % )	2014	600
senior notes due november 15 2025 5.000% ( 5.000 % )	600	600
senior notes due december 1 2027 3.483% ( 3.483 % )	600	2014
mississippi economic development revenue bonds due may 1 2024 7.81% ( 7.81 % )	84	84
gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds due december 1 2028 4.55% ( 4.55 % )	21	21
less unamortized debt issuance costs	-26 ( 26 )	-27 ( 27 )
total long-term debt	1279	1278

Post-table text:
credit facility - in november 2017 , the company terminated its second amended and restated credit agreement and entered into a new credit agreement ( the "credit facility" ) with third-party lenders .
the credit facility includes a revolving credit facility of $ 1250 million , which may be drawn upon during a period of five years from november 22 , 2017 .
the revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility of $ 500 million .
the revolving credit facility has a variable interest rate on outstanding borrowings based on the london interbank offered rate ( "libor" ) plus a spread based upon the company's credit rating , which may vary between 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) and 1.500% ( 1.500 % ) .
the revolving credit facility also has a commitment fee rate on the unutilized balance based on the company 2019s leverage ratio .
the commitment fee rate as of december 31 , 2017 was 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) and may vary between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.30% ( 0.30 % ) .
the credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants , as well as a financial covenant based on a maximum total leverage ratio .
each of the company's existing and future material wholly owned domestic subsidiaries , except those that are specifically designated as unrestricted subsidiaries , are and will be guarantors under the credit facility .
in july 2015 , the company used cash on hand to repay all amounts outstanding under a prior credit facility , including $ 345 million in principal amount of outstanding term loans .
as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 15 million in letters of credit were issued but undrawn , and the remaining $ 1235 million of the revolving credit facility was unutilized .
the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with its credit facilities of $ 11 million and $ 8 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .
senior notes - in december 2017 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes with registration rights due december 2027 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2017 redemption described below .
in november 2015 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due november 2025 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2015 tender offer and redemption described below .
interest on the company's senior notes is payable semi-annually .
the terms of the 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) and 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes limit the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create liens , enter into sale and leaseback transactions , sell assets , and effect consolidations or mergers .
the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes of $ 15 million and $ 19 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
so what was the percentage change during this time?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes between 2016 and 2017?
[Turn 2] so what was the percentage change during this time?

Pre-table text:
as of december 31 , 2017 , the company had gross state income tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $ 20 million , which expire from 2018 through 2020 .
a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 16 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established related to these state income tax credit carry-forwards , with a valuation allowance of $ 7 million against such deferred tax asset as of december 31 , 2017 .
the company had a gross state net operating loss carry-forward of $ 39 million , which expires in 2027 .
a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 3 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established for the net operating loss carry-forward , with a full valuation allowance as of december 31 , 2017 .
other state and foreign net operating loss carry-forwards are separately and cumulatively immaterial to the company 2019s deferred tax balances and expire between 2026 and 2036 .
14 .
debt long-term debt consisted of the following: .

Table:
( $ in millions )	december 31 2017	december 31 2016
senior notes due december 15 2021 5.000% ( 5.000 % )	2014	600
senior notes due november 15 2025 5.000% ( 5.000 % )	600	600
senior notes due december 1 2027 3.483% ( 3.483 % )	600	2014
mississippi economic development revenue bonds due may 1 2024 7.81% ( 7.81 % )	84	84
gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds due december 1 2028 4.55% ( 4.55 % )	21	21
less unamortized debt issuance costs	-26 ( 26 )	-27 ( 27 )
total long-term debt	1279	1278

Post-table text:
credit facility - in november 2017 , the company terminated its second amended and restated credit agreement and entered into a new credit agreement ( the "credit facility" ) with third-party lenders .
the credit facility includes a revolving credit facility of $ 1250 million , which may be drawn upon during a period of five years from november 22 , 2017 .
the revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility of $ 500 million .
the revolving credit facility has a variable interest rate on outstanding borrowings based on the london interbank offered rate ( "libor" ) plus a spread based upon the company's credit rating , which may vary between 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) and 1.500% ( 1.500 % ) .
the revolving credit facility also has a commitment fee rate on the unutilized balance based on the company 2019s leverage ratio .
the commitment fee rate as of december 31 , 2017 was 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) and may vary between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.30% ( 0.30 % ) .
the credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants , as well as a financial covenant based on a maximum total leverage ratio .
each of the company's existing and future material wholly owned domestic subsidiaries , except those that are specifically designated as unrestricted subsidiaries , are and will be guarantors under the credit facility .
in july 2015 , the company used cash on hand to repay all amounts outstanding under a prior credit facility , including $ 345 million in principal amount of outstanding term loans .
as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 15 million in letters of credit were issued but undrawn , and the remaining $ 1235 million of the revolving credit facility was unutilized .
the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with its credit facilities of $ 11 million and $ 8 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .
senior notes - in december 2017 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes with registration rights due december 2027 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2017 redemption described below .
in november 2015 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due november 2025 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2015 tender offer and redemption described below .
interest on the company's senior notes is payable semi-annually .
the terms of the 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) and 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes limit the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create liens , enter into sale and leaseback transactions , sell assets , and effect consolidations or mergers .
the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes of $ 15 million and $ 19 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the change associated with credit facilities during that time?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes between 2016 and 2017?
[Turn 2] so what was the percentage change during this time?
[Turn 3] what was the change associated with credit facilities during that time?

Pre-table text:
as of december 31 , 2017 , the company had gross state income tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $ 20 million , which expire from 2018 through 2020 .
a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 16 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established related to these state income tax credit carry-forwards , with a valuation allowance of $ 7 million against such deferred tax asset as of december 31 , 2017 .
the company had a gross state net operating loss carry-forward of $ 39 million , which expires in 2027 .
a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 3 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established for the net operating loss carry-forward , with a full valuation allowance as of december 31 , 2017 .
other state and foreign net operating loss carry-forwards are separately and cumulatively immaterial to the company 2019s deferred tax balances and expire between 2026 and 2036 .
14 .
debt long-term debt consisted of the following: .

Table:
( $ in millions )	december 31 2017	december 31 2016
senior notes due december 15 2021 5.000% ( 5.000 % )	2014	600
senior notes due november 15 2025 5.000% ( 5.000 % )	600	600
senior notes due december 1 2027 3.483% ( 3.483 % )	600	2014
mississippi economic development revenue bonds due may 1 2024 7.81% ( 7.81 % )	84	84
gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds due december 1 2028 4.55% ( 4.55 % )	21	21
less unamortized debt issuance costs	-26 ( 26 )	-27 ( 27 )
total long-term debt	1279	1278

Post-table text:
credit facility - in november 2017 , the company terminated its second amended and restated credit agreement and entered into a new credit agreement ( the "credit facility" ) with third-party lenders .
the credit facility includes a revolving credit facility of $ 1250 million , which may be drawn upon during a period of five years from november 22 , 2017 .
the revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility of $ 500 million .
the revolving credit facility has a variable interest rate on outstanding borrowings based on the london interbank offered rate ( "libor" ) plus a spread based upon the company's credit rating , which may vary between 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) and 1.500% ( 1.500 % ) .
the revolving credit facility also has a commitment fee rate on the unutilized balance based on the company 2019s leverage ratio .
the commitment fee rate as of december 31 , 2017 was 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) and may vary between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.30% ( 0.30 % ) .
the credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants , as well as a financial covenant based on a maximum total leverage ratio .
each of the company's existing and future material wholly owned domestic subsidiaries , except those that are specifically designated as unrestricted subsidiaries , are and will be guarantors under the credit facility .
in july 2015 , the company used cash on hand to repay all amounts outstanding under a prior credit facility , including $ 345 million in principal amount of outstanding term loans .
as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 15 million in letters of credit were issued but undrawn , and the remaining $ 1235 million of the revolving credit facility was unutilized .
the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with its credit facilities of $ 11 million and $ 8 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .
senior notes - in december 2017 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes with registration rights due december 2027 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2017 redemption described below .
in november 2015 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due november 2025 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2015 tender offer and redemption described below .
interest on the company's senior notes is payable semi-annually .
the terms of the 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) and 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes limit the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create liens , enter into sale and leaseback transactions , sell assets , and effect consolidations or mergers .
the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes of $ 15 million and $ 19 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
so what was the percentage change?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes between 2016 and 2017?
[Turn 2] so what was the percentage change during this time?
[Turn 3] what was the change associated with credit facilities during that time?
[Turn 4] so what was the percentage change?

Pre-table text:
as of december 31 , 2017 , the company had gross state income tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $ 20 million , which expire from 2018 through 2020 .
a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 16 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established related to these state income tax credit carry-forwards , with a valuation allowance of $ 7 million against such deferred tax asset as of december 31 , 2017 .
the company had a gross state net operating loss carry-forward of $ 39 million , which expires in 2027 .
a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 3 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established for the net operating loss carry-forward , with a full valuation allowance as of december 31 , 2017 .
other state and foreign net operating loss carry-forwards are separately and cumulatively immaterial to the company 2019s deferred tax balances and expire between 2026 and 2036 .
14 .
debt long-term debt consisted of the following: .

Table:
( $ in millions )	december 31 2017	december 31 2016
senior notes due december 15 2021 5.000% ( 5.000 % )	2014	600
senior notes due november 15 2025 5.000% ( 5.000 % )	600	600
senior notes due december 1 2027 3.483% ( 3.483 % )	600	2014
mississippi economic development revenue bonds due may 1 2024 7.81% ( 7.81 % )	84	84
gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds due december 1 2028 4.55% ( 4.55 % )	21	21
less unamortized debt issuance costs	-26 ( 26 )	-27 ( 27 )
total long-term debt	1279	1278

Post-table text:
credit facility - in november 2017 , the company terminated its second amended and restated credit agreement and entered into a new credit agreement ( the "credit facility" ) with third-party lenders .
the credit facility includes a revolving credit facility of $ 1250 million , which may be drawn upon during a period of five years from november 22 , 2017 .
the revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility of $ 500 million .
the revolving credit facility has a variable interest rate on outstanding borrowings based on the london interbank offered rate ( "libor" ) plus a spread based upon the company's credit rating , which may vary between 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) and 1.500% ( 1.500 % ) .
the revolving credit facility also has a commitment fee rate on the unutilized balance based on the company 2019s leverage ratio .
the commitment fee rate as of december 31 , 2017 was 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) and may vary between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.30% ( 0.30 % ) .
the credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants , as well as a financial covenant based on a maximum total leverage ratio .
each of the company's existing and future material wholly owned domestic subsidiaries , except those that are specifically designated as unrestricted subsidiaries , are and will be guarantors under the credit facility .
in july 2015 , the company used cash on hand to repay all amounts outstanding under a prior credit facility , including $ 345 million in principal amount of outstanding term loans .
as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 15 million in letters of credit were issued but undrawn , and the remaining $ 1235 million of the revolving credit facility was unutilized .
the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with its credit facilities of $ 11 million and $ 8 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .
senior notes - in december 2017 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes with registration rights due december 2027 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2017 redemption described below .
in november 2015 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due november 2025 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2015 tender offer and redemption described below .
interest on the company's senior notes is payable semi-annually .
the terms of the 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) and 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes limit the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create liens , enter into sale and leaseback transactions , sell assets , and effect consolidations or mergers .
the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes of $ 15 million and $ 19 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the ratio of discretionary company contributions to total expensed amounts for savings plans in 2009?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the ratio of discretionary company contributions to total expensed amounts for savings plans in 2009?

Pre-table text:
notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) cash flows for 2010 , we expect to contribute $ 25.2 and $ 9.2 to our foreign pension plans and domestic pension plans , respectively .
a significant portion of our contributions to the foreign pension plans relate to the u.k .
pension plan .
additionally , we are in the process of modifying the schedule of employer contributions for the u.k .
pension plan and we expect to finalize this during 2010 .
as a result , we expect our contributions to our foreign pension plans to increase from current levels in 2010 and subsequent years .
during 2009 , we contributed $ 31.9 to our foreign pension plans and contributions to the domestic pension plan were negligible .
the following estimated future benefit payments , which reflect future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid in the years indicated below .
domestic pension plans foreign pension plans postretirement benefit plans .

Table:
years	domestic pension plans	foreign pension plans	postretirement benefit plans
2010	$ 17.2	$ 23.5	$ 5.8
2011	11.1	24.7	5.7
2012	10.8	26.4	5.7
2013	10.5	28.2	5.6
2014	10.5	32.4	5.5
2015 2013 2019	48.5	175.3	24.8

Post-table text:
the estimated future payments for our postretirement benefit plans are before any estimated federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 .
federal subsidies are estimated to range from $ 0.5 in 2010 to $ 0.6 in 2014 and are estimated to be $ 2.4 for the period 2015-2019 .
savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees .
the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allows participants to choose among various investment alternatives .
we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service .
amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 35.1 , $ 29.6 and $ 31.4 , respectively .
expense includes a discretionary company contribution of $ 3.8 , $ 4.0 and $ 4.9 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 2.7 , $ 7.8 , $ 6.0 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 25.0 , $ 28.7 and $ 26.7 to these plans in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation , or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account .
the arrangements typically provide that the participant will receive the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service or upon retirement or termination .
as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the deferred compensation liability balance was $ 100.3 and $ 107.6 , respectively .
amounts expensed for deferred compensation arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 11.6 , $ 5.7 and $ 11.9 , respectively .
we have deferred benefit arrangements with certain key officers and employees that provide participants with an annual payment , payable when the participant attains a certain age and after the participant 2019s employment has terminated .
the deferred benefit liability was $ 178.2 and $ 182.1 as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
amounts expensed for deferred benefit arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 12.0 , $ 14.9 and $ 15.5 , respectively .
we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .
as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 119.4 and $ 100.2 , respectively .
in addition to the life insurance policies , certain investments are held for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .
these investments , along with the life insurance policies , are held in a separate revocable trust for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and the deferred benefit .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is that times 100?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the ratio of discretionary company contributions to total expensed amounts for savings plans in 2009?
[Turn 2] what is that times 100?

Pre-table text:
notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) cash flows for 2010 , we expect to contribute $ 25.2 and $ 9.2 to our foreign pension plans and domestic pension plans , respectively .
a significant portion of our contributions to the foreign pension plans relate to the u.k .
pension plan .
additionally , we are in the process of modifying the schedule of employer contributions for the u.k .
pension plan and we expect to finalize this during 2010 .
as a result , we expect our contributions to our foreign pension plans to increase from current levels in 2010 and subsequent years .
during 2009 , we contributed $ 31.9 to our foreign pension plans and contributions to the domestic pension plan were negligible .
the following estimated future benefit payments , which reflect future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid in the years indicated below .
domestic pension plans foreign pension plans postretirement benefit plans .

Table:
years	domestic pension plans	foreign pension plans	postretirement benefit plans
2010	$ 17.2	$ 23.5	$ 5.8
2011	11.1	24.7	5.7
2012	10.8	26.4	5.7
2013	10.5	28.2	5.6
2014	10.5	32.4	5.5
2015 2013 2019	48.5	175.3	24.8

Post-table text:
the estimated future payments for our postretirement benefit plans are before any estimated federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 .
federal subsidies are estimated to range from $ 0.5 in 2010 to $ 0.6 in 2014 and are estimated to be $ 2.4 for the period 2015-2019 .
savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees .
the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allows participants to choose among various investment alternatives .
we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service .
amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 35.1 , $ 29.6 and $ 31.4 , respectively .
expense includes a discretionary company contribution of $ 3.8 , $ 4.0 and $ 4.9 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 2.7 , $ 7.8 , $ 6.0 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 25.0 , $ 28.7 and $ 26.7 to these plans in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation , or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account .
the arrangements typically provide that the participant will receive the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service or upon retirement or termination .
as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the deferred compensation liability balance was $ 100.3 and $ 107.6 , respectively .
amounts expensed for deferred compensation arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 11.6 , $ 5.7 and $ 11.9 , respectively .
we have deferred benefit arrangements with certain key officers and employees that provide participants with an annual payment , payable when the participant attains a certain age and after the participant 2019s employment has terminated .
the deferred benefit liability was $ 178.2 and $ 182.1 as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
amounts expensed for deferred benefit arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 12.0 , $ 14.9 and $ 15.5 , respectively .
we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .
as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 119.4 and $ 100.2 , respectively .
in addition to the life insurance policies , certain investments are held for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .
these investments , along with the life insurance policies , are held in a separate revocable trust for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and the deferred benefit .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the equipment rents payable in 2008?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the equipment rents payable in 2008?

Pre-table text:
when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use .
however , many of our assets are self-constructed .
a large portion of our capital expenditures is for track structure expansion ( capacity projects ) and replacement ( program projects ) , which is typically performed by our employees .
approximately 13% ( 13 % ) of our full-time equivalent employees are dedicated to the construction of capital assets .
costs that are directly attributable or overhead costs that relate directly to capital projects are capitalized .
direct costs that are capitalized as part of self-constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment .
indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset .
these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases .
the capitalization of indirect costs is consistent with fasb statement no .
67 , accounting for costs and initial rental operations of real estate projects .
general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred .
normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized .
assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .
amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .
10 .
accounts payable and other current liabilities dec .
31 , dec .
31 , millions of dollars 2008 2007 .

Table:
millions of dollars	dec . 31 2008	dec . 31 2007
accounts payable	$ 629	$ 732
accrued wages and vacation	367	394
accrued casualty costs	390	371
income and other taxes	207	343
dividends and interest	328	284
equipment rents payable	93	103
other	546	675
total accounts payable and other current liabilities	$ 2560	$ 2902

Post-table text:
11 .
fair value measurements during the first quarter of 2008 , we fully adopted fasb statement no .
157 , fair value measurements ( fas 157 ) .
fas 157 established a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements .
the adoption of fas 157 had no impact on our financial position or results of operations .
fas 157 applies to all assets and liabilities that are measured and reported on a fair value basis .
this enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values .
the statement requires that each asset and liability carried at fair value be classified into one of the following categories : level 1 : quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities .
level 2 : observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data .
level 3 : unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and in 2007?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the equipment rents payable in 2008?
[Turn 2] and in 2007?

Pre-table text:
when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use .
however , many of our assets are self-constructed .
a large portion of our capital expenditures is for track structure expansion ( capacity projects ) and replacement ( program projects ) , which is typically performed by our employees .
approximately 13% ( 13 % ) of our full-time equivalent employees are dedicated to the construction of capital assets .
costs that are directly attributable or overhead costs that relate directly to capital projects are capitalized .
direct costs that are capitalized as part of self-constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment .
indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset .
these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases .
the capitalization of indirect costs is consistent with fasb statement no .
67 , accounting for costs and initial rental operations of real estate projects .
general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred .
normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized .
assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .
amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .
10 .
accounts payable and other current liabilities dec .
31 , dec .
31 , millions of dollars 2008 2007 .

Table:
millions of dollars	dec . 31 2008	dec . 31 2007
accounts payable	$ 629	$ 732
accrued wages and vacation	367	394
accrued casualty costs	390	371
income and other taxes	207	343
dividends and interest	328	284
equipment rents payable	93	103
other	546	675
total accounts payable and other current liabilities	$ 2560	$ 2902

Post-table text:
11 .
fair value measurements during the first quarter of 2008 , we fully adopted fasb statement no .
157 , fair value measurements ( fas 157 ) .
fas 157 established a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements .
the adoption of fas 157 had no impact on our financial position or results of operations .
fas 157 applies to all assets and liabilities that are measured and reported on a fair value basis .
this enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values .
the statement requires that each asset and liability carried at fair value be classified into one of the following categories : level 1 : quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities .
level 2 : observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data .
level 3 : unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
so what was the difference between the two years?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the equipment rents payable in 2008?
[Turn 2] and in 2007?
[Turn 3] so what was the difference between the two years?

Pre-table text:
when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use .
however , many of our assets are self-constructed .
a large portion of our capital expenditures is for track structure expansion ( capacity projects ) and replacement ( program projects ) , which is typically performed by our employees .
approximately 13% ( 13 % ) of our full-time equivalent employees are dedicated to the construction of capital assets .
costs that are directly attributable or overhead costs that relate directly to capital projects are capitalized .
direct costs that are capitalized as part of self-constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment .
indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset .
these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases .
the capitalization of indirect costs is consistent with fasb statement no .
67 , accounting for costs and initial rental operations of real estate projects .
general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred .
normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized .
assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .
amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .
10 .
accounts payable and other current liabilities dec .
31 , dec .
31 , millions of dollars 2008 2007 .

Table:
millions of dollars	dec . 31 2008	dec . 31 2007
accounts payable	$ 629	$ 732
accrued wages and vacation	367	394
accrued casualty costs	390	371
income and other taxes	207	343
dividends and interest	328	284
equipment rents payable	93	103
other	546	675
total accounts payable and other current liabilities	$ 2560	$ 2902

Post-table text:
11 .
fair value measurements during the first quarter of 2008 , we fully adopted fasb statement no .
157 , fair value measurements ( fas 157 ) .
fas 157 established a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements .
the adoption of fas 157 had no impact on our financial position or results of operations .
fas 157 applies to all assets and liabilities that are measured and reported on a fair value basis .
this enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values .
the statement requires that each asset and liability carried at fair value be classified into one of the following categories : level 1 : quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities .
level 2 : observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data .
level 3 : unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and the value for 2007 again?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the equipment rents payable in 2008?
[Turn 2] and in 2007?
[Turn 3] so what was the difference between the two years?
[Turn 4] and the value for 2007 again?

Pre-table text:
when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use .
however , many of our assets are self-constructed .
a large portion of our capital expenditures is for track structure expansion ( capacity projects ) and replacement ( program projects ) , which is typically performed by our employees .
approximately 13% ( 13 % ) of our full-time equivalent employees are dedicated to the construction of capital assets .
costs that are directly attributable or overhead costs that relate directly to capital projects are capitalized .
direct costs that are capitalized as part of self-constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment .
indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset .
these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases .
the capitalization of indirect costs is consistent with fasb statement no .
67 , accounting for costs and initial rental operations of real estate projects .
general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred .
normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized .
assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .
amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .
10 .
accounts payable and other current liabilities dec .
31 , dec .
31 , millions of dollars 2008 2007 .

Table:
millions of dollars	dec . 31 2008	dec . 31 2007
accounts payable	$ 629	$ 732
accrued wages and vacation	367	394
accrued casualty costs	390	371
income and other taxes	207	343
dividends and interest	328	284
equipment rents payable	93	103
other	546	675
total accounts payable and other current liabilities	$ 2560	$ 2902

Post-table text:
11 .
fair value measurements during the first quarter of 2008 , we fully adopted fasb statement no .
157 , fair value measurements ( fas 157 ) .
fas 157 established a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements .
the adoption of fas 157 had no impact on our financial position or results of operations .
fas 157 applies to all assets and liabilities that are measured and reported on a fair value basis .
this enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values .
the statement requires that each asset and liability carried at fair value be classified into one of the following categories : level 1 : quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities .
level 2 : observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data .
level 3 : unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
so what was the percentage change during this time?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the equipment rents payable in 2008?
[Turn 2] and in 2007?
[Turn 3] so what was the difference between the two years?
[Turn 4] and the value for 2007 again?
[Turn 5] so what was the percentage change during this time?

Pre-table text:
when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use .
however , many of our assets are self-constructed .
a large portion of our capital expenditures is for track structure expansion ( capacity projects ) and replacement ( program projects ) , which is typically performed by our employees .
approximately 13% ( 13 % ) of our full-time equivalent employees are dedicated to the construction of capital assets .
costs that are directly attributable or overhead costs that relate directly to capital projects are capitalized .
direct costs that are capitalized as part of self-constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment .
indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset .
these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases .
the capitalization of indirect costs is consistent with fasb statement no .
67 , accounting for costs and initial rental operations of real estate projects .
general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred .
normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized .
assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .
amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .
10 .
accounts payable and other current liabilities dec .
31 , dec .
31 , millions of dollars 2008 2007 .

Table:
millions of dollars	dec . 31 2008	dec . 31 2007
accounts payable	$ 629	$ 732
accrued wages and vacation	367	394
accrued casualty costs	390	371
income and other taxes	207	343
dividends and interest	328	284
equipment rents payable	93	103
other	546	675
total accounts payable and other current liabilities	$ 2560	$ 2902

Post-table text:
11 .
fair value measurements during the first quarter of 2008 , we fully adopted fasb statement no .
157 , fair value measurements ( fas 157 ) .
fas 157 established a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements .
the adoption of fas 157 had no impact on our financial position or results of operations .
fas 157 applies to all assets and liabilities that are measured and reported on a fair value basis .
this enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values .
the statement requires that each asset and liability carried at fair value be classified into one of the following categories : level 1 : quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities .
level 2 : observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data .
level 3 : unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
how much did the gallons hedged in 2018 represent in relation to the ones hedged in 2017?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] how much did the gallons hedged in 2018 represent in relation to the ones hedged in 2017?

Pre-table text:
republic services , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 16 .
financial instruments fuel hedges we have entered into multiple swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges to mitigate some of our exposure related to changes in diesel fuel prices .
these swaps qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of forecasted diesel fuel purchases ( fuel hedges ) .
the following table summarizes our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2016 : year gallons hedged weighted average contract price per gallon .

Table:
year	gallons hedged	weighted average contractprice per gallon
2017	12000000	$ 2.92
2018	3000000	2.61

Post-table text:
if the national u.s .
on-highway average price for a gallon of diesel fuel as published by the department of energy exceeds the contract price per gallon , we receive the difference between the average price and the contract price ( multiplied by the notional gallons ) from the counterparty .
if the average price is less than the contract price per gallon , we pay the difference to the counterparty .
the fair values of our fuel hedges are determined using standard option valuation models with assumptions about commodity prices based on those observed in underlying markets ( level 2 in the fair value hierarchy ) .
the aggregate fair values of our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 were current liabilities of $ 2.7 million and $ 37.8 million , respectively , and have been recorded in other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets .
the ineffective portions of the changes in fair values resulted in a gain of $ 0.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , and a loss of $ 0.4 million and $ 0.5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , and have been recorded in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income .
total gain ( loss ) recognized in other comprehensive income ( loss ) for fuel hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ 20.7 million , $ ( 2.0 ) million and $ ( 24.2 ) million , for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .
we classify cash inflows and outflows from our fuel hedges within operating activities in the unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows .
recycling commodity hedges revenue from the sale of recycled commodities is primarily from sales of old corrugated containers and old newsprint .
from time to time we use derivative instruments such as swaps and costless collars designated as cash flow hedges to manage our exposure to changes in prices of these commodities .
during 2016 , we entered into multiple agreements related to the forecasted occ sales .
the agreements qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of certain forecasted recycling commodity sales ( commodity hedges ) .
we entered into costless collar agreements on forecasted sales of occ .
the agreements involve combining a purchased put option giving us the right to sell occ at an established floor strike price with a written call option obligating us to deliver occ at an established cap strike price .
the puts and calls have the same settlement dates , are net settled in cash on such dates and have the same terms to expiration .
the contemporaneous combination of options resulted in no net premium for us and represents costless collars .
under these agreements , we will make or receive no payments as long as the settlement price is between the floor price and cap price ; however , if the settlement price is above the cap , we will pay the counterparty an amount equal to the excess of the settlement price over the cap times the monthly volumes hedged .
if the settlement price is below the floor , the counterparty will pay us the deficit of the settlement price below the floor times the monthly volumes hedged .
the objective of these agreements is to reduce variability of cash flows for forecasted sales of occ between two designated strike prices. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and in the previous year of this period, what was the aggregate fair value of the outstanding fuel hedges?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] how much did the gallons hedged in 2018 represent in relation to the ones hedged in 2017?
[Turn 2] and in the previous year of this period, what was the aggregate fair value of the outstanding fuel hedges?

Pre-table text:
republic services , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 16 .
financial instruments fuel hedges we have entered into multiple swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges to mitigate some of our exposure related to changes in diesel fuel prices .
these swaps qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of forecasted diesel fuel purchases ( fuel hedges ) .
the following table summarizes our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2016 : year gallons hedged weighted average contract price per gallon .

Table:
year	gallons hedged	weighted average contractprice per gallon
2017	12000000	$ 2.92
2018	3000000	2.61

Post-table text:
if the national u.s .
on-highway average price for a gallon of diesel fuel as published by the department of energy exceeds the contract price per gallon , we receive the difference between the average price and the contract price ( multiplied by the notional gallons ) from the counterparty .
if the average price is less than the contract price per gallon , we pay the difference to the counterparty .
the fair values of our fuel hedges are determined using standard option valuation models with assumptions about commodity prices based on those observed in underlying markets ( level 2 in the fair value hierarchy ) .
the aggregate fair values of our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 were current liabilities of $ 2.7 million and $ 37.8 million , respectively , and have been recorded in other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets .
the ineffective portions of the changes in fair values resulted in a gain of $ 0.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , and a loss of $ 0.4 million and $ 0.5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , and have been recorded in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income .
total gain ( loss ) recognized in other comprehensive income ( loss ) for fuel hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ 20.7 million , $ ( 2.0 ) million and $ ( 24.2 ) million , for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .
we classify cash inflows and outflows from our fuel hedges within operating activities in the unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows .
recycling commodity hedges revenue from the sale of recycled commodities is primarily from sales of old corrugated containers and old newsprint .
from time to time we use derivative instruments such as swaps and costless collars designated as cash flow hedges to manage our exposure to changes in prices of these commodities .
during 2016 , we entered into multiple agreements related to the forecasted occ sales .
the agreements qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of certain forecasted recycling commodity sales ( commodity hedges ) .
we entered into costless collar agreements on forecasted sales of occ .
the agreements involve combining a purchased put option giving us the right to sell occ at an established floor strike price with a written call option obligating us to deliver occ at an established cap strike price .
the puts and calls have the same settlement dates , are net settled in cash on such dates and have the same terms to expiration .
the contemporaneous combination of options resulted in no net premium for us and represents costless collars .
under these agreements , we will make or receive no payments as long as the settlement price is between the floor price and cap price ; however , if the settlement price is above the cap , we will pay the counterparty an amount equal to the excess of the settlement price over the cap times the monthly volumes hedged .
if the settlement price is below the floor , the counterparty will pay us the deficit of the settlement price below the floor times the monthly volumes hedged .
the objective of these agreements is to reduce variability of cash flows for forecasted sales of occ between two designated strike prices. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was it in 2015?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] how much did the gallons hedged in 2018 represent in relation to the ones hedged in 2017?
[Turn 2] and in the previous year of this period, what was the aggregate fair value of the outstanding fuel hedges?
[Turn 3] what was it in 2015?

Pre-table text:
republic services , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 16 .
financial instruments fuel hedges we have entered into multiple swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges to mitigate some of our exposure related to changes in diesel fuel prices .
these swaps qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of forecasted diesel fuel purchases ( fuel hedges ) .
the following table summarizes our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2016 : year gallons hedged weighted average contract price per gallon .

Table:
year	gallons hedged	weighted average contractprice per gallon
2017	12000000	$ 2.92
2018	3000000	2.61

Post-table text:
if the national u.s .
on-highway average price for a gallon of diesel fuel as published by the department of energy exceeds the contract price per gallon , we receive the difference between the average price and the contract price ( multiplied by the notional gallons ) from the counterparty .
if the average price is less than the contract price per gallon , we pay the difference to the counterparty .
the fair values of our fuel hedges are determined using standard option valuation models with assumptions about commodity prices based on those observed in underlying markets ( level 2 in the fair value hierarchy ) .
the aggregate fair values of our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 were current liabilities of $ 2.7 million and $ 37.8 million , respectively , and have been recorded in other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets .
the ineffective portions of the changes in fair values resulted in a gain of $ 0.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , and a loss of $ 0.4 million and $ 0.5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , and have been recorded in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income .
total gain ( loss ) recognized in other comprehensive income ( loss ) for fuel hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ 20.7 million , $ ( 2.0 ) million and $ ( 24.2 ) million , for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .
we classify cash inflows and outflows from our fuel hedges within operating activities in the unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows .
recycling commodity hedges revenue from the sale of recycled commodities is primarily from sales of old corrugated containers and old newsprint .
from time to time we use derivative instruments such as swaps and costless collars designated as cash flow hedges to manage our exposure to changes in prices of these commodities .
during 2016 , we entered into multiple agreements related to the forecasted occ sales .
the agreements qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of certain forecasted recycling commodity sales ( commodity hedges ) .
we entered into costless collar agreements on forecasted sales of occ .
the agreements involve combining a purchased put option giving us the right to sell occ at an established floor strike price with a written call option obligating us to deliver occ at an established cap strike price .
the puts and calls have the same settlement dates , are net settled in cash on such dates and have the same terms to expiration .
the contemporaneous combination of options resulted in no net premium for us and represents costless collars .
under these agreements , we will make or receive no payments as long as the settlement price is between the floor price and cap price ; however , if the settlement price is above the cap , we will pay the counterparty an amount equal to the excess of the settlement price over the cap times the monthly volumes hedged .
if the settlement price is below the floor , the counterparty will pay us the deficit of the settlement price below the floor times the monthly volumes hedged .
the objective of these agreements is to reduce variability of cash flows for forecasted sales of occ between two designated strike prices. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.