[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet trading assets in 2008?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet trading assets in 2008?

Pre-table text:
the notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $ 1.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .
the amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .
these items have been classified appropriately in trading account assets or trading account liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet .
changes in fair value of these items are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
other items for which the fair-value option was selected in accordance with sfas 159 the company has elected the fair-value option for the following eligible items , which did not affect opening retained earnings : 2022 certain credit products ; 2022 certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity-method investments ; 2022 certain structured liabilities ; 2022 certain non-structured liabilities ; and 2022 certain mortgage loans certain credit products citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain originated and purchased loans , including certain unfunded loan products , such as guarantees and letters of credit , executed by citigroup 2019s trading businesses .
none of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment .
significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term , or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party .
citigroup has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications .
fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the company , including where those management objectives would not be met .
the following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value: .

Table:
in millions of dollars	2008 trading assets	2008 loans	2008 trading assets	loans
carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet	$ 16254	$ 2315	$ 26020	$ 3038
aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value	$ 6501	$ 3	$ 899	$ -5 ( 5 )
balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due	$ 77	$ 1113	$ 186	$ 1292
aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue	$ 190	$ -4 ( 4 )	$ 68	$ 2014

Post-table text:
in millions of dollars trading assets loans trading assets loans carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 16254 $ 2315 $ 26020 $ 3038 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value $ 6501 $ 3 $ 899 $ ( 5 ) balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 77 $ 1113 $ 186 $ 1292 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 190 $ ( 4 ) $ 68 $ 2014 in addition to the amounts reported above , $ 72 million and $ 141 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-value accounting were outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively .
changes in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loans depending on their balance sheet classifications .
the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 38 million and $ 188 million , respectively .
certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation .
the company has elected the fair-value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in our investment companies , which are reported at fair value .
the fair-value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments .
as required by sfas 159 , all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value .
these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .
citigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for under the equity method .
the company elected fair-value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity .
since the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value , the impact of applying the equity method to citigroup 2019s investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-value accounting .
thus , this fair-value election had no impact on opening retained earnings .
these investments are classified as other assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .
changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
certain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) .
the company elected the fair- value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis .
these positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form .
for those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 277 million as of december 31 , 2008 and $ 7 million as of december 31 , 2007 .
the change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement .
certain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was it in 2007?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet trading assets in 2008?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2007?

Pre-table text:
the notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $ 1.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .
the amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .
these items have been classified appropriately in trading account assets or trading account liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet .
changes in fair value of these items are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
other items for which the fair-value option was selected in accordance with sfas 159 the company has elected the fair-value option for the following eligible items , which did not affect opening retained earnings : 2022 certain credit products ; 2022 certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity-method investments ; 2022 certain structured liabilities ; 2022 certain non-structured liabilities ; and 2022 certain mortgage loans certain credit products citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain originated and purchased loans , including certain unfunded loan products , such as guarantees and letters of credit , executed by citigroup 2019s trading businesses .
none of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment .
significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term , or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party .
citigroup has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications .
fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the company , including where those management objectives would not be met .
the following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value: .

Table:
in millions of dollars	2008 trading assets	2008 loans	2008 trading assets	loans
carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet	$ 16254	$ 2315	$ 26020	$ 3038
aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value	$ 6501	$ 3	$ 899	$ -5 ( 5 )
balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due	$ 77	$ 1113	$ 186	$ 1292
aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue	$ 190	$ -4 ( 4 )	$ 68	$ 2014

Post-table text:
in millions of dollars trading assets loans trading assets loans carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 16254 $ 2315 $ 26020 $ 3038 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value $ 6501 $ 3 $ 899 $ ( 5 ) balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 77 $ 1113 $ 186 $ 1292 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 190 $ ( 4 ) $ 68 $ 2014 in addition to the amounts reported above , $ 72 million and $ 141 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-value accounting were outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively .
changes in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loans depending on their balance sheet classifications .
the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 38 million and $ 188 million , respectively .
certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation .
the company has elected the fair-value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in our investment companies , which are reported at fair value .
the fair-value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments .
as required by sfas 159 , all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value .
these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .
citigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for under the equity method .
the company elected fair-value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity .
since the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value , the impact of applying the equity method to citigroup 2019s investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-value accounting .
thus , this fair-value election had no impact on opening retained earnings .
these investments are classified as other assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .
changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
certain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) .
the company elected the fair- value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis .
these positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form .
for those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 277 million as of december 31 , 2008 and $ 7 million as of december 31 , 2007 .
the change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement .
certain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was, then, the change over the year?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet trading assets in 2008?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2007?
[Turn 3] what was, then, the change over the year?

Pre-table text:
the notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $ 1.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .
the amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .
these items have been classified appropriately in trading account assets or trading account liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet .
changes in fair value of these items are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
other items for which the fair-value option was selected in accordance with sfas 159 the company has elected the fair-value option for the following eligible items , which did not affect opening retained earnings : 2022 certain credit products ; 2022 certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity-method investments ; 2022 certain structured liabilities ; 2022 certain non-structured liabilities ; and 2022 certain mortgage loans certain credit products citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain originated and purchased loans , including certain unfunded loan products , such as guarantees and letters of credit , executed by citigroup 2019s trading businesses .
none of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment .
significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term , or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party .
citigroup has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications .
fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the company , including where those management objectives would not be met .
the following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value: .

Table:
in millions of dollars	2008 trading assets	2008 loans	2008 trading assets	loans
carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet	$ 16254	$ 2315	$ 26020	$ 3038
aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value	$ 6501	$ 3	$ 899	$ -5 ( 5 )
balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due	$ 77	$ 1113	$ 186	$ 1292
aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue	$ 190	$ -4 ( 4 )	$ 68	$ 2014

Post-table text:
in millions of dollars trading assets loans trading assets loans carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 16254 $ 2315 $ 26020 $ 3038 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value $ 6501 $ 3 $ 899 $ ( 5 ) balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 77 $ 1113 $ 186 $ 1292 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 190 $ ( 4 ) $ 68 $ 2014 in addition to the amounts reported above , $ 72 million and $ 141 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-value accounting were outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively .
changes in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loans depending on their balance sheet classifications .
the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 38 million and $ 188 million , respectively .
certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation .
the company has elected the fair-value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in our investment companies , which are reported at fair value .
the fair-value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments .
as required by sfas 159 , all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value .
these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .
citigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for under the equity method .
the company elected fair-value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity .
since the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value , the impact of applying the equity method to citigroup 2019s investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-value accounting .
thus , this fair-value election had no impact on opening retained earnings .
these investments are classified as other assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .
changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
certain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) .
the company elected the fair- value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis .
these positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form .
for those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 277 million as of december 31 , 2008 and $ 7 million as of december 31 , 2007 .
the change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement .
certain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2007 carrying amount, in percentage?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet trading assets in 2008?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2007?
[Turn 3] what was, then, the change over the year?
[Turn 4] and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2007 carrying amount, in percentage?

Pre-table text:
the notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $ 1.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .
the amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .
these items have been classified appropriately in trading account assets or trading account liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet .
changes in fair value of these items are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
other items for which the fair-value option was selected in accordance with sfas 159 the company has elected the fair-value option for the following eligible items , which did not affect opening retained earnings : 2022 certain credit products ; 2022 certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity-method investments ; 2022 certain structured liabilities ; 2022 certain non-structured liabilities ; and 2022 certain mortgage loans certain credit products citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain originated and purchased loans , including certain unfunded loan products , such as guarantees and letters of credit , executed by citigroup 2019s trading businesses .
none of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment .
significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term , or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party .
citigroup has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications .
fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the company , including where those management objectives would not be met .
the following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value: .

Table:
in millions of dollars	2008 trading assets	2008 loans	2008 trading assets	loans
carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet	$ 16254	$ 2315	$ 26020	$ 3038
aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value	$ 6501	$ 3	$ 899	$ -5 ( 5 )
balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due	$ 77	$ 1113	$ 186	$ 1292
aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue	$ 190	$ -4 ( 4 )	$ 68	$ 2014

Post-table text:
in millions of dollars trading assets loans trading assets loans carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 16254 $ 2315 $ 26020 $ 3038 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value $ 6501 $ 3 $ 899 $ ( 5 ) balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 77 $ 1113 $ 186 $ 1292 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 190 $ ( 4 ) $ 68 $ 2014 in addition to the amounts reported above , $ 72 million and $ 141 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-value accounting were outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively .
changes in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loans depending on their balance sheet classifications .
the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 38 million and $ 188 million , respectively .
certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation .
the company has elected the fair-value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in our investment companies , which are reported at fair value .
the fair-value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments .
as required by sfas 159 , all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value .
these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .
citigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for under the equity method .
the company elected fair-value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity .
since the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value , the impact of applying the equity method to citigroup 2019s investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-value accounting .
thus , this fair-value election had no impact on opening retained earnings .
these investments are classified as other assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .
changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
certain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) .
the company elected the fair- value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis .
these positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form .
for those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 277 million as of december 31 , 2008 and $ 7 million as of december 31 , 2007 .
the change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement .
certain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the net change in total maximum exposure to loss fro vies from 2016 to 2017?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the net change in total maximum exposure to loss fro vies from 2016 to 2017?

Pre-table text:
64 | 2017 form 10-k notes to consolidated financial statements 1 .
operations and summary of significant accounting policies a .
nature of operations information in our financial statements and related commentary are presented in the following categories : machinery , energy & transportation ( me&t ) 2013 represents the aggregate total of construction industries , resource industries , energy & transportation and all other operating segments and related corporate items and eliminations .
financial products 2013 primarily includes the company 2019s financial products segment .
this category includes caterpillar financial services corporation ( cat financial ) , caterpillar insurance holdings inc .
( insurance services ) and their respective subsidiaries .
our products are sold primarily under the brands 201ccaterpillar , 201d 201ccat , 201d design versions of 201ccat 201d and 201ccaterpillar , 201d 201cemd , 201d 201cfg wilson , 201d 201cmak , 201d 201cmwm , 201d 201cperkins , 201d 201cprogress rail , 201d 201csem 201d and 201csolar turbines 201d .
we conduct operations in our machinery , energy & transportation lines of business under highly competitive conditions , including intense price competition .
we place great emphasis on the high quality and performance of our products and our dealers 2019 service support .
although no one competitor is believed to produce all of the same types of equipment that we do , there are numerous companies , large and small , which compete with us in the sale of each of our products .
our machines are distributed principally through a worldwide organization of dealers ( dealer network ) , 48 located in the united states and 123 located outside the united states , serving 192 countries .
reciprocating engines are sold principally through the dealer network and to other manufacturers for use in products .
some of the reciprocating engines manufactured by our subsidiary perkins engines company limited , are also sold through its worldwide network of 93 distributors covering 182 countries .
the fg wilson branded electric power generation systems primarily manufactured by our subsidiary caterpillar northern ireland limited are sold through its worldwide network of 154 distributors covering 131 countries .
some of the large , medium speed reciprocating engines are also sold a0 under the mak brand through a worldwide network of 20 distributors covering 130 countries .
our dealers do not deal exclusively with our products ; however , in most cases sales and servicing of our products are the dealers 2019 principal business .
some products , primarily turbines and locomotives , are sold directly to end customers through sales forces employed by the company .
at times , these employees are assisted by independent sales representatives .
the financial products line of business also conducts operations under highly competitive conditions .
financing for users of caterpillar products is available through a variety of competitive sources , principally commercial banks and finance and leasing companies .
we offer various financing plans designed to increase the opportunity for sales of our products and generate financing income for our company .
a significant portion of financial products activity is conducted in north america , with additional offices in latin america , asia/pacific , europe , africa and middle east .
b .
basis of presentation the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of caterpillar a0 inc .
and its subsidiaries where we have a controlling financial interest .
investments in companies where our ownership exceeds 20 percent and we do not have a controlling interest or where the ownership is less than 20 percent and for which we have a significant influence are accounted for by the equity method .
see note 9 for further discussion .
we consolidate all variable interest entities ( vies ) where caterpillar inc .
is the primary beneficiary .
for vies , we assess whether we are the primary beneficiary as prescribed by the accounting guidance on the consolidation of vies .
the primary beneficiary of a vie is the party that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity 2019s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the vie .
see note 21 for further discussion on a consolidated vie .
we have affiliates , suppliers and dealers that are vies of which we are not the primary beneficiary .
although we have provided financial support , we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of each entity .
our maximum exposure to loss from vies for which we are not the primary beneficiary was as follows: .

Table:
( millions of dollars )	december 31 , 2017	december 31 , 2016
receivables - trade and other	$ 34	$ 55
receivables - finance	42	174
long-term receivables - finance	38	246
investments in unconsolidated affiliated companies	39	31
guarantees	259	210
total	$ 412	$ 716

Post-table text:
in addition , cat financial has end-user customers that are vies of which we are not the primary beneficiary .
although we have provided financial support to these entities and therefore have a variable interest , we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact their economic performance .
our maximum exposure to loss from our involvement with these vies is limited to the credit risk inherently present in the financial support that we have provided .
these risks are evaluated and reflected in our financial statements as part of our overall portfolio of finance receivables and related allowance for credit losses. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the percent change?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the net change in total maximum exposure to loss fro vies from 2016 to 2017?
[Turn 2] what is the percent change?

Pre-table text:
64 | 2017 form 10-k notes to consolidated financial statements 1 .
operations and summary of significant accounting policies a .
nature of operations information in our financial statements and related commentary are presented in the following categories : machinery , energy & transportation ( me&t ) 2013 represents the aggregate total of construction industries , resource industries , energy & transportation and all other operating segments and related corporate items and eliminations .
financial products 2013 primarily includes the company 2019s financial products segment .
this category includes caterpillar financial services corporation ( cat financial ) , caterpillar insurance holdings inc .
( insurance services ) and their respective subsidiaries .
our products are sold primarily under the brands 201ccaterpillar , 201d 201ccat , 201d design versions of 201ccat 201d and 201ccaterpillar , 201d 201cemd , 201d 201cfg wilson , 201d 201cmak , 201d 201cmwm , 201d 201cperkins , 201d 201cprogress rail , 201d 201csem 201d and 201csolar turbines 201d .
we conduct operations in our machinery , energy & transportation lines of business under highly competitive conditions , including intense price competition .
we place great emphasis on the high quality and performance of our products and our dealers 2019 service support .
although no one competitor is believed to produce all of the same types of equipment that we do , there are numerous companies , large and small , which compete with us in the sale of each of our products .
our machines are distributed principally through a worldwide organization of dealers ( dealer network ) , 48 located in the united states and 123 located outside the united states , serving 192 countries .
reciprocating engines are sold principally through the dealer network and to other manufacturers for use in products .
some of the reciprocating engines manufactured by our subsidiary perkins engines company limited , are also sold through its worldwide network of 93 distributors covering 182 countries .
the fg wilson branded electric power generation systems primarily manufactured by our subsidiary caterpillar northern ireland limited are sold through its worldwide network of 154 distributors covering 131 countries .
some of the large , medium speed reciprocating engines are also sold a0 under the mak brand through a worldwide network of 20 distributors covering 130 countries .
our dealers do not deal exclusively with our products ; however , in most cases sales and servicing of our products are the dealers 2019 principal business .
some products , primarily turbines and locomotives , are sold directly to end customers through sales forces employed by the company .
at times , these employees are assisted by independent sales representatives .
the financial products line of business also conducts operations under highly competitive conditions .
financing for users of caterpillar products is available through a variety of competitive sources , principally commercial banks and finance and leasing companies .
we offer various financing plans designed to increase the opportunity for sales of our products and generate financing income for our company .
a significant portion of financial products activity is conducted in north america , with additional offices in latin america , asia/pacific , europe , africa and middle east .
b .
basis of presentation the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of caterpillar a0 inc .
and its subsidiaries where we have a controlling financial interest .
investments in companies where our ownership exceeds 20 percent and we do not have a controlling interest or where the ownership is less than 20 percent and for which we have a significant influence are accounted for by the equity method .
see note 9 for further discussion .
we consolidate all variable interest entities ( vies ) where caterpillar inc .
is the primary beneficiary .
for vies , we assess whether we are the primary beneficiary as prescribed by the accounting guidance on the consolidation of vies .
the primary beneficiary of a vie is the party that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity 2019s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the vie .
see note 21 for further discussion on a consolidated vie .
we have affiliates , suppliers and dealers that are vies of which we are not the primary beneficiary .
although we have provided financial support , we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of each entity .
our maximum exposure to loss from vies for which we are not the primary beneficiary was as follows: .

Table:
( millions of dollars )	december 31 , 2017	december 31 , 2016
receivables - trade and other	$ 34	$ 55
receivables - finance	42	174
long-term receivables - finance	38	246
investments in unconsolidated affiliated companies	39	31
guarantees	259	210
total	$ 412	$ 716

Post-table text:
in addition , cat financial has end-user customers that are vies of which we are not the primary beneficiary .
although we have provided financial support to these entities and therefore have a variable interest , we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact their economic performance .
our maximum exposure to loss from our involvement with these vies is limited to the credit risk inherently present in the financial support that we have provided .
these risks are evaluated and reflected in our financial statements as part of our overall portfolio of finance receivables and related allowance for credit losses. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the price of jpmorgan chase in 2014?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the price of jpmorgan chase in 2014?

Pre-table text:
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 63 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .
( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .
the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s .
equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .
the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .
and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .
the s&p financial index is an index of 85 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .
the firm is a component of all three industry indices .
the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .
the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .
december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 .

Table:
december 31 ( in dollars )	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014
jpmorgan chase	$ 100.00	$ 102.30	$ 81.87	$ 111.49	$ 152.42	$ 167.48
kbw bank index	100.00	123.36	94.75	125.91	173.45	189.69
s&p financial index	100.00	112.13	93.00	119.73	162.34	186.98
s&p 500 index	100.00	115.06	117.48	136.27	180.39	205.07

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is that less an initial $100 investment?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the price of jpmorgan chase in 2014?
[Turn 2] what is that less an initial $100 investment?

Pre-table text:
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 63 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .
( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .
the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s .
equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .
the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .
and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .
the s&p financial index is an index of 85 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .
the firm is a component of all three industry indices .
the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .
the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .
december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 .

Table:
december 31 ( in dollars )	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014
jpmorgan chase	$ 100.00	$ 102.30	$ 81.87	$ 111.49	$ 152.42	$ 167.48
kbw bank index	100.00	123.36	94.75	125.91	173.45	189.69
s&p financial index	100.00	112.13	93.00	119.73	162.34	186.98
s&p 500 index	100.00	115.06	117.48	136.27	180.39	205.07

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is that change over 100?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the price of jpmorgan chase in 2014?
[Turn 2] what is that less an initial $100 investment?
[Turn 3] what is that change over 100?

Pre-table text:
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 63 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .
( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .
the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s .
equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .
the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .
and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .
the s&p financial index is an index of 85 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .
the firm is a component of all three industry indices .
the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .
the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .
december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 .

Table:
december 31 ( in dollars )	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014
jpmorgan chase	$ 100.00	$ 102.30	$ 81.87	$ 111.49	$ 152.42	$ 167.48
kbw bank index	100.00	123.36	94.75	125.91	173.45	189.69
s&p financial index	100.00	112.13	93.00	119.73	162.34	186.98
s&p 500 index	100.00	115.06	117.48	136.27	180.39	205.07

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the value of non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005?

Pre-table text:
with apb no .
25 .
instead , companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the related expense associated with share-based payments in the statement of operations .
sfas 123r is effective for us as of january 1 , 2006 .
we have historically accounted for share-based payments to employees under apb no .
25 2019s intrinsic value method .
as such , we generally have not recognized compensation expense for options granted to employees .
we will adopt the provisions of sfas 123r under the modified prospective method , in which compensation cost for all share-based payments granted or modified after the effective date is recognized based upon the requirements of sfas 123r , and compensation cost for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date that are unvested as of the effective date of sfas 123r is recognized based on sfas 123 .
tax benefits will be recognized related to the cost for share-based payments to the extent the equity instrument would ordinarily result in a future tax deduction under existing law .
tax expense will be recognized to write off excess deferred tax assets when the tax deduction upon settlement of a vested option is less than the expense recorded in the statement of operations ( to the extent not offset by prior tax credits for settlements where the tax deduction was greater than the fair value cost ) .
we estimate that we will recognize equity-based compensation expense of approximately $ 35 million to $ 38 million for the year ending december 31 , 2006 .
this amount is subject to revisions as we finalize certain assumptions related to 2006 , including the size and nature of awards and forfeiture rates .
sfas 123r also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow rather than as operating cash flow as was previously required .
we cannot estimate what the future tax benefits will be as the amounts depend on , among other factors , future employee stock option exercises .
due to the our tax loss position , there was no operating cash inflow realized for december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for such excess tax deductions .
in march 2005 , the sec issued staff accounting bulletin ( sab ) no .
107 regarding the staff 2019s interpretation of sfas 123r .
this interpretation provides the staff 2019s views regarding interactions between sfas 123r and certain sec rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies .
the interpretive guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of sfas 123r and investors and users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided .
we will follow the guidance prescribed in sab no .
107 in connection with our adoption of sfas 123r .
information presented pursuant to the indentures of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) the following table sets forth information that is presented solely to address certain tower cash flow reporting requirements contained in the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .
the information contained in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements is also presented to address certain reporting requirements contained in the indenture for our ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .
the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005	$ 139590
consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ 498266
less : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	-524804 ( 524804 )
plus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005	558360
adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ 531822
non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ -30584 ( 30584 )

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is that expressed as a positive number?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005?
[Turn 2] what is that expressed as a positive number?

Pre-table text:
with apb no .
25 .
instead , companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the related expense associated with share-based payments in the statement of operations .
sfas 123r is effective for us as of january 1 , 2006 .
we have historically accounted for share-based payments to employees under apb no .
25 2019s intrinsic value method .
as such , we generally have not recognized compensation expense for options granted to employees .
we will adopt the provisions of sfas 123r under the modified prospective method , in which compensation cost for all share-based payments granted or modified after the effective date is recognized based upon the requirements of sfas 123r , and compensation cost for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date that are unvested as of the effective date of sfas 123r is recognized based on sfas 123 .
tax benefits will be recognized related to the cost for share-based payments to the extent the equity instrument would ordinarily result in a future tax deduction under existing law .
tax expense will be recognized to write off excess deferred tax assets when the tax deduction upon settlement of a vested option is less than the expense recorded in the statement of operations ( to the extent not offset by prior tax credits for settlements where the tax deduction was greater than the fair value cost ) .
we estimate that we will recognize equity-based compensation expense of approximately $ 35 million to $ 38 million for the year ending december 31 , 2006 .
this amount is subject to revisions as we finalize certain assumptions related to 2006 , including the size and nature of awards and forfeiture rates .
sfas 123r also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow rather than as operating cash flow as was previously required .
we cannot estimate what the future tax benefits will be as the amounts depend on , among other factors , future employee stock option exercises .
due to the our tax loss position , there was no operating cash inflow realized for december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for such excess tax deductions .
in march 2005 , the sec issued staff accounting bulletin ( sab ) no .
107 regarding the staff 2019s interpretation of sfas 123r .
this interpretation provides the staff 2019s views regarding interactions between sfas 123r and certain sec rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies .
the interpretive guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of sfas 123r and investors and users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided .
we will follow the guidance prescribed in sab no .
107 in connection with our adoption of sfas 123r .
information presented pursuant to the indentures of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) the following table sets forth information that is presented solely to address certain tower cash flow reporting requirements contained in the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .
the information contained in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements is also presented to address certain reporting requirements contained in the indenture for our ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .
the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005	$ 139590
consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ 498266
less : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	-524804 ( 524804 )
plus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005	558360
adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ 531822
non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ -30584 ( 30584 )

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is that divided by the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005?
[Turn 2] what is that expressed as a positive number?
[Turn 3] what is that divided by the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005?

Pre-table text:
with apb no .
25 .
instead , companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the related expense associated with share-based payments in the statement of operations .
sfas 123r is effective for us as of january 1 , 2006 .
we have historically accounted for share-based payments to employees under apb no .
25 2019s intrinsic value method .
as such , we generally have not recognized compensation expense for options granted to employees .
we will adopt the provisions of sfas 123r under the modified prospective method , in which compensation cost for all share-based payments granted or modified after the effective date is recognized based upon the requirements of sfas 123r , and compensation cost for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date that are unvested as of the effective date of sfas 123r is recognized based on sfas 123 .
tax benefits will be recognized related to the cost for share-based payments to the extent the equity instrument would ordinarily result in a future tax deduction under existing law .
tax expense will be recognized to write off excess deferred tax assets when the tax deduction upon settlement of a vested option is less than the expense recorded in the statement of operations ( to the extent not offset by prior tax credits for settlements where the tax deduction was greater than the fair value cost ) .
we estimate that we will recognize equity-based compensation expense of approximately $ 35 million to $ 38 million for the year ending december 31 , 2006 .
this amount is subject to revisions as we finalize certain assumptions related to 2006 , including the size and nature of awards and forfeiture rates .
sfas 123r also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow rather than as operating cash flow as was previously required .
we cannot estimate what the future tax benefits will be as the amounts depend on , among other factors , future employee stock option exercises .
due to the our tax loss position , there was no operating cash inflow realized for december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for such excess tax deductions .
in march 2005 , the sec issued staff accounting bulletin ( sab ) no .
107 regarding the staff 2019s interpretation of sfas 123r .
this interpretation provides the staff 2019s views regarding interactions between sfas 123r and certain sec rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies .
the interpretive guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of sfas 123r and investors and users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided .
we will follow the guidance prescribed in sab no .
107 in connection with our adoption of sfas 123r .
information presented pursuant to the indentures of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) the following table sets forth information that is presented solely to address certain tower cash flow reporting requirements contained in the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .
the information contained in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements is also presented to address certain reporting requirements contained in the indenture for our ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .
the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005	$ 139590
consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ 498266
less : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	-524804 ( 524804 )
plus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005	558360
adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ 531822
non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ -30584 ( 30584 )

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the total number of securities approved by security holders?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the total number of securities approved by security holders?

Pre-table text:
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2017 .
equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 448859 $ 0.00 4087587 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 .

Table:
plan category	number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )	weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights	number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )
equity compensation plans approved by security holders	448859	$ 0.00	4087587
equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 )	2014	2014	2014
total	448859	$ 0.00	4087587

Post-table text:
( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc .
2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc .
2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation .
of these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan .
in addition , this number includes 28763 stock rights , 3075 restricted stock rights , and 389898 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement .
( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders .
item 13 .
certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year .
item 14 .
principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what about the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the total number of securities approved by security holders?
[Turn 2] what about the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights?

Pre-table text:
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2017 .
equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 448859 $ 0.00 4087587 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 .

Table:
plan category	number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )	weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights	number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )
equity compensation plans approved by security holders	448859	$ 0.00	4087587
equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 )	2014	2014	2014
total	448859	$ 0.00	4087587

Post-table text:
( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc .
2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc .
2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation .
of these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan .
in addition , this number includes 28763 stock rights , 3075 restricted stock rights , and 389898 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement .
( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders .
item 13 .
certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year .
item 14 .
principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what proportion does this represent?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the total number of securities approved by security holders?
[Turn 2] what about the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights?
[Turn 3] what proportion does this represent?

Pre-table text:
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2017 .
equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 448859 $ 0.00 4087587 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 .

Table:
plan category	number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )	weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights	number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )
equity compensation plans approved by security holders	448859	$ 0.00	4087587
equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 )	2014	2014	2014
total	448859	$ 0.00	4087587

Post-table text:
( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc .
2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc .
2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation .
of these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan .
in addition , this number includes 28763 stock rights , 3075 restricted stock rights , and 389898 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement .
( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders .
item 13 .
certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year .
item 14 .
principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
between the years of 2011 and 2012, what was the change in rent expenses?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] between the years of 2011 and 2012, what was the change in rent expenses?

Pre-table text:
at december 31 , 2012 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operat- ing leases and purchase obligations were as follows: .

Table:
in millions	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	thereafter
lease obligations	$ 198	$ 136	$ 106	$ 70	$ 50	$ 141
purchase obligations ( a )	3213	828	722	620	808	2654
total	$ 3411	$ 964	$ 828	$ 690	$ 858	$ 2795

Post-table text:
( a ) includes $ 3.6 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the company 2019s 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquis- ition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business .
rent expense was $ 231 million , $ 205 million and $ 210 million for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively .
guarantees in connection with sales of businesses , property , equipment , forestlands and other assets , interna- tional paper commonly makes representations and warranties relating to such businesses or assets , and may agree to indemnify buyers with respect to tax and environmental liabilities , breaches of representations and warranties , and other matters .
where liabilities for such matters are determined to be probable and subject to reasonable estimation , accrued liabilities are recorded at the time of sale as a cost of the transaction .
environmental proceedings international paper has been named as a potentially responsible party in environmental remediation actions under various federal and state laws , includ- ing the comprehensive environmental response , compensation and liability act ( cercla ) .
many of these proceedings involve the cleanup of hazardous substances at large commercial landfills that received waste from many different sources .
while joint and several liability is authorized under cercla and equivalent state laws , as a practical matter , liability for cercla cleanups is typically allocated among the many potential responsible parties .
remedial costs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they become probable and reasonably estimable .
international paper has estimated the probable liability associated with these matters to be approximately $ 92 million in the aggregate at december 31 , 2012 .
one of the matters referenced above is a closed wood treating facility located in cass lake , minneso- ta .
during 2009 , in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cercla , international paper submitted to the epa a site remediation feasi- bility study .
in june 2011 , the epa selected and published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $ 46 million .
the overall remediation reserve for the site is currently $ 48 mil- lion to address this selection of an alternative for the soil remediation component of the overall site remedy .
in october 2011 , the epa released a public statement indicating that the final soil remedy deci- sion would be delayed .
in the unlikely event that the epa changes its proposed soil remedy and approves instead a more expensive clean-up alternative , the remediation costs could be material , and sig- nificantly higher than amounts currently recorded .
in october 2012 , the natural resource trustees for this site provided notice to international paper and other potentially responsible parties of their intent to per- form a natural resource damage assessment .
it is premature to predict the outcome of the assessment or to estimate a loss or range of loss , if any , which may be incurred .
in addition to the above matters , other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current , closed or formerly-owned facilities , and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet , totaled approximately $ 46 million at december 31 , 2012 .
other than as described above , completion of required remedial actions is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements .
the company is a potentially responsible party with respect to the allied paper , inc./portage creek/ kalamazoo river superfund site ( kalamazoo river superfund site ) in michigan .
the epa asserts that the site is contaminated primarily by pcbs as a result of discharges from various paper mills located along the river , including a paper mill formerly owned by st .
regis .
the company is a successor in interest to st .
regis .
international paper has not received any orders from the epa with respect to the site and is in the process of collecting information from the epa and other parties relative to the kalamazoo river superfund site to evaluate the extent of its liability , if any , with respect to the site .
accordingly , it is pre- mature to estimate a loss or range of loss with respect to this site .
also in connection with the kalamazoo river superfund site , the company was named as a defendant by georgia-pacific consumer products lp , fort james corporation and georgia pacific llc in a contribution and cost recovery action for alleged pollution at the kalamazoo river super- fund site .
the suit seeks contribution under cercla for $ 79 million in costs purportedly expended by plaintiffs as of the filing of the com- plaint , and for future remediation costs .
the suit alleges that a mill , during the time it was allegedly owned and operated by st .
regis , discharged pcb contaminated solids and paper residuals resulting from paper de-inking and recycling .
also named as defendants in the suit are ncr corporation and weyerhaeuser company .
in mid-2011 , the suit was .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was this change between 2010 and 2011?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] between the years of 2011 and 2012, what was the change in rent expenses?
[Turn 2] and what was this change between 2010 and 2011?

Pre-table text:
at december 31 , 2012 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operat- ing leases and purchase obligations were as follows: .

Table:
in millions	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	thereafter
lease obligations	$ 198	$ 136	$ 106	$ 70	$ 50	$ 141
purchase obligations ( a )	3213	828	722	620	808	2654
total	$ 3411	$ 964	$ 828	$ 690	$ 858	$ 2795

Post-table text:
( a ) includes $ 3.6 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the company 2019s 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquis- ition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business .
rent expense was $ 231 million , $ 205 million and $ 210 million for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively .
guarantees in connection with sales of businesses , property , equipment , forestlands and other assets , interna- tional paper commonly makes representations and warranties relating to such businesses or assets , and may agree to indemnify buyers with respect to tax and environmental liabilities , breaches of representations and warranties , and other matters .
where liabilities for such matters are determined to be probable and subject to reasonable estimation , accrued liabilities are recorded at the time of sale as a cost of the transaction .
environmental proceedings international paper has been named as a potentially responsible party in environmental remediation actions under various federal and state laws , includ- ing the comprehensive environmental response , compensation and liability act ( cercla ) .
many of these proceedings involve the cleanup of hazardous substances at large commercial landfills that received waste from many different sources .
while joint and several liability is authorized under cercla and equivalent state laws , as a practical matter , liability for cercla cleanups is typically allocated among the many potential responsible parties .
remedial costs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they become probable and reasonably estimable .
international paper has estimated the probable liability associated with these matters to be approximately $ 92 million in the aggregate at december 31 , 2012 .
one of the matters referenced above is a closed wood treating facility located in cass lake , minneso- ta .
during 2009 , in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cercla , international paper submitted to the epa a site remediation feasi- bility study .
in june 2011 , the epa selected and published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $ 46 million .
the overall remediation reserve for the site is currently $ 48 mil- lion to address this selection of an alternative for the soil remediation component of the overall site remedy .
in october 2011 , the epa released a public statement indicating that the final soil remedy deci- sion would be delayed .
in the unlikely event that the epa changes its proposed soil remedy and approves instead a more expensive clean-up alternative , the remediation costs could be material , and sig- nificantly higher than amounts currently recorded .
in october 2012 , the natural resource trustees for this site provided notice to international paper and other potentially responsible parties of their intent to per- form a natural resource damage assessment .
it is premature to predict the outcome of the assessment or to estimate a loss or range of loss , if any , which may be incurred .
in addition to the above matters , other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current , closed or formerly-owned facilities , and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet , totaled approximately $ 46 million at december 31 , 2012 .
other than as described above , completion of required remedial actions is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements .
the company is a potentially responsible party with respect to the allied paper , inc./portage creek/ kalamazoo river superfund site ( kalamazoo river superfund site ) in michigan .
the epa asserts that the site is contaminated primarily by pcbs as a result of discharges from various paper mills located along the river , including a paper mill formerly owned by st .
regis .
the company is a successor in interest to st .
regis .
international paper has not received any orders from the epa with respect to the site and is in the process of collecting information from the epa and other parties relative to the kalamazoo river superfund site to evaluate the extent of its liability , if any , with respect to the site .
accordingly , it is pre- mature to estimate a loss or range of loss with respect to this site .
also in connection with the kalamazoo river superfund site , the company was named as a defendant by georgia-pacific consumer products lp , fort james corporation and georgia pacific llc in a contribution and cost recovery action for alleged pollution at the kalamazoo river super- fund site .
the suit seeks contribution under cercla for $ 79 million in costs purportedly expended by plaintiffs as of the filing of the com- plaint , and for future remediation costs .
the suit alleges that a mill , during the time it was allegedly owned and operated by st .
regis , discharged pcb contaminated solids and paper residuals resulting from paper de-inking and recycling .
also named as defendants in the suit are ncr corporation and weyerhaeuser company .
in mid-2011 , the suit was .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders in 2008?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders in 2008?

Pre-table text:
54| | duke realty corporation annual report 2009 net income ( loss ) per common share basic net income ( loss ) per common share is computed by dividing net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders , less dividends on share-based awards expected to vest , by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period .
diluted net income ( loss ) per common share is computed by dividing the sum of basic net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders and the noncontrolling interest in earnings allocable to units not owned by us ( to the extent the units are dilutive ) , by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and , to the extent they are dilutive , limited partnership units outstanding , as well as any potential dilutive securities for the period .
during the first quarter of 2009 , we adopted a new accounting standard ( fasb asc 260-10 ) on participating securities , which we have applied retrospectively to prior period calculations of basic and diluted earnings per common share .
pursuant to this new standard , certain of our share-based awards are considered participating securities because they earn dividend equivalents that are not forfeited even if the underlying award does not vest .
the following table reconciles the components of basic and diluted net income ( loss ) per common share ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
	2009	2008	2007
net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders	$ -333601 ( 333601 )	$ 50408	$ 211942
less : dividends on share-based awards expected to vest	-1759 ( 1759 )	-1631 ( 1631 )	-1149 ( 1149 )
basic net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders	-335360 ( 335360 )	48777	210793
noncontrolling interest in earnings of common unitholders ( 1 )	-	2640	13998
diluted net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders	$ -335360 ( 335360 )	$ 51417	$ 224791
weighted average number of common shares outstanding	201206	146915	139255
weighted average partnership units outstanding	-	7619	9204
other potential dilutive shares ( 2 )	-	19	791
weighted average number of common shares and potential dilutive securities	201206	154553	149250

Post-table text:
weighted average number of common shares and potential diluted securities 201206 154553 149250 ( 1 ) the partnership units are anti-dilutive for the year ended december 31 , 2009 , as a result of the net loss for that period .
therefore , 6687 units ( in thousands ) are excluded from the weighted average number of common shares and potential dilutive securities for the year ended december 31 , 2009 and $ 11099 noncontrolling interest in earnings of common unitholders ( in thousands ) is excluded from diluted net loss attributable to common shareholders for the year ended december 31 , 2009 .
( 2 ) excludes ( in thousands of shares ) 7872 ; 8219 and 1144 of anti-dilutive shares for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively related to stock-based compensation plans .
also excludes ( in thousands of shares ) the exchangeable notes that have 8089 ; 11771 and 11751 of anti-dilutive shares for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
federal income taxes we have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ( 201creit 201d ) under the internal revenue code of 1986 , as amended .
to qualify as a reit , we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements , including a requirement to distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our adjusted taxable income to our stockholders .
management intends to continue to adhere to these requirements and to maintain our reit status .
as a reit , we are entitled to a tax deduction for some or all of the dividends we pay to shareholders .
accordingly , we generally will not be subject to federal income taxes as long as we distribute an amount equal to or in excess of our taxable income currently to shareholders .
we are also generally subject to federal income taxes on any taxable income that is not currently distributed to our shareholders .
if we fail to qualify as a reit in any taxable year , we will be subject to federal income taxes and may not be able to qualify as a reit for four subsequent taxable years .
reit qualification reduces , but does not eliminate , the amount of state and local taxes we pay .
in addition , our financial statements include the operations of taxable corporate subsidiaries that are not entitled to a dividends paid deduction and are subject to corporate federal , state and local income taxes .
as a reit , we may also be subject to certain federal excise taxes if we engage in certain types of transactions. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.