[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and in the precedent year of that date, in 2005, what was the rental expense under operating leases?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] as of december 31, 2006, what was the total of the future minimum lease commitments for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year?
[Turn 2] and what percentage from those commitments was due in 2007?
[Turn 3] and in the precedent year of that date, in 2005, what was the rental expense under operating leases?

Pre-table text:
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 .
in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments .
the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits .

Table:
( in millions )	pensionbenefits	otherbenefits
2007	$ 1440	$ 260
2008	1490	260
2009	1540	270
2010	1600	270
2011	1660	270
years 2012 2013 2016	9530	1260

Post-table text:
as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits .
the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million .
the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 .
we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans .
the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .
note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .
future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) .
certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s .
government under short-term or cancelable arrangements .
note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment .
we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole .
we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty .
these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio .
the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology .
we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation .
on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california .
we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program .
the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s .
air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 .
on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim .
our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals .
on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel .
natural resources defense council , et al v .
lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel .
john d .
tillson v .
lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al .
the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was it in 2004?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] as of december 31, 2006, what was the total of the future minimum lease commitments for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year?
[Turn 2] and what percentage from those commitments was due in 2007?
[Turn 3] and in the precedent year of that date, in 2005, what was the rental expense under operating leases?
[Turn 4] what was it in 2004?

Pre-table text:
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 .
in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments .
the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits .

Table:
( in millions )	pensionbenefits	otherbenefits
2007	$ 1440	$ 260
2008	1490	260
2009	1540	270
2010	1600	270
2011	1660	270
years 2012 2013 2016	9530	1260

Post-table text:
as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits .
the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million .
the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 .
we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans .
the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .
note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .
future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) .
certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s .
government under short-term or cancelable arrangements .
note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment .
we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole .
we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty .
these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio .
the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology .
we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation .
on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california .
we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program .
the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s .
air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 .
on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim .
our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals .
on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel .
natural resources defense council , et al v .
lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel .
john d .
tillson v .
lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al .
the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was, then, the change over the year?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] as of december 31, 2006, what was the total of the future minimum lease commitments for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year?
[Turn 2] and what percentage from those commitments was due in 2007?
[Turn 3] and in the precedent year of that date, in 2005, what was the rental expense under operating leases?
[Turn 4] what was it in 2004?
[Turn 5] what was, then, the change over the year?

Pre-table text:
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 .
in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments .
the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits .

Table:
( in millions )	pensionbenefits	otherbenefits
2007	$ 1440	$ 260
2008	1490	260
2009	1540	270
2010	1600	270
2011	1660	270
years 2012 2013 2016	9530	1260

Post-table text:
as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits .
the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million .
the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 .
we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans .
the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .
note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .
future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) .
certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s .
government under short-term or cancelable arrangements .
note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment .
we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole .
we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty .
these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio .
the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology .
we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation .
on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california .
we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program .
the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s .
air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 .
on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim .
our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals .
on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel .
natural resources defense council , et al v .
lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel .
john d .
tillson v .
lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al .
the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was this change as a percent of the 2004 expense?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] as of december 31, 2006, what was the total of the future minimum lease commitments for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year?
[Turn 2] and what percentage from those commitments was due in 2007?
[Turn 3] and in the precedent year of that date, in 2005, what was the rental expense under operating leases?
[Turn 4] what was it in 2004?
[Turn 5] what was, then, the change over the year?
[Turn 6] and what was this change as a percent of the 2004 expense?

Pre-table text:
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 .
in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments .
the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits .

Table:
( in millions )	pensionbenefits	otherbenefits
2007	$ 1440	$ 260
2008	1490	260
2009	1540	270
2010	1600	270
2011	1660	270
years 2012 2013 2016	9530	1260

Post-table text:
as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits .
the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million .
the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 .
we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans .
the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .
note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .
future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) .
certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s .
government under short-term or cancelable arrangements .
note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment .
we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole .
we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty .
these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio .
the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology .
we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation .
on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california .
we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program .
the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s .
air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 .
on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim .
our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals .
on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel .
natural resources defense council , et al v .
lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel .
john d .
tillson v .
lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al .
the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the pre-tax pension and postretirement expense in 2019?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the pre-tax pension and postretirement expense in 2019?

Pre-table text:
inventory on hand , as well as our future purchase commitments with our suppliers , considering multiple factors , including demand forecasts , product life cycle , current sales levels , pricing strategy and cost trends .
if our review indicates that inventories of raw materials , components or finished products have become obsolete or are in excess of anticipated demand or that inventory cost exceeds net realizable value , we may be required to make adjustments that will impact the results of operations .
goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation - we test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review .
while the company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists , the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis .
the impairment analysis involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value .
if the carrying value exceeds the fair value , goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired .
to determine the fair value of goodwill , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model , supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies within the tobacco industry .
at december 31 , 2018 , the carrying value of our goodwill was $ 7.2 billion , which is related to ten reporting units , each of which consists of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics .
the estimated fair value of each of our ten reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of december 31 , 2018 .
to determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method .
we concluded that the fair value of our non- amortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value .
these discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant for forecasting operating cash flows , which are subject to changes in business conditions , such as volumes and prices , costs to produce , discount rates and estimated capital needs .
management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values are estimated , and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use .
since the march 28 , 2008 , spin-off from altria group , inc. , we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill or non-amortizable intangible assets .
marketing costs - we incur certain costs to support our products through programs that include advertising , marketing , consumer engagement and trade promotions .
the costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with u.s .
gaap .
recognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program .
for volume-based incentives provided to customers , management continually assesses and estimates , by customer , the likelihood of the customer's achieving the specified targets , and records the reduction of revenue as the sales are made .
for other trade promotions , management relies on estimated utilization rates that have been developed from historical experience .
changes in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program would not result in a material change in our financial position , results of operations or operating cash flows .
employee benefit plans - as discussed in item 8 , note 13 .
benefit plans to our consolidated financial statements , we provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees , including pensions , postretirement health care and postemployment benefits ( primarily severance ) .
we record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by u.s .
gaap .
these calculations include various actuarial assumptions , such as discount rates , assumed rates of return on plan assets , compensation increases , mortality , turnover rates and health care cost trend rates .
we review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so .
as permitted by u.s .
gaap , any effect of the modifications is generally amortized over future periods .
we believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans are reasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries .
weighted-average discount rate assumptions for pension and postretirement plan obligations at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 are as follows: .

Table:
	2018	2017
pension plans	1.61% ( 1.61 % )	1.51% ( 1.51 % )
postretirement plans	3.97% ( 3.97 % )	3.79% ( 3.79 % )

Post-table text:
we anticipate that assumption changes will increase 2019 pre-tax pension and postretirement expense to approximately $ 205 million as compared with approximately $ 160 million in 2018 , excluding amounts related to employee severance and early retirement programs .
the anticipated increase is primarily due to higher amortization out of other comprehensive earnings for unrecognized actuarial gains/ losses of $ 14 million , coupled with lower return on assets of $ 16 million , higher interest and service cost of $ 12 million and $ 4 million respectively , partially offset by other movements of $ 1 million .
weighted-average expected rate of return and discount rate assumptions have a significant effect on the amount of expense reported for the employee benefit plans .
a fifty-basis-point decrease in our discount rate would increase our 2019 pension and postretirement expense by approximately $ 50 million , and a fifty-basis-point increase in our discount rate would decrease our 2019 pension and postretirement .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what is it in 2018?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the pre-tax pension and postretirement expense in 2019?
[Turn 2] and what is it in 2018?

Pre-table text:
inventory on hand , as well as our future purchase commitments with our suppliers , considering multiple factors , including demand forecasts , product life cycle , current sales levels , pricing strategy and cost trends .
if our review indicates that inventories of raw materials , components or finished products have become obsolete or are in excess of anticipated demand or that inventory cost exceeds net realizable value , we may be required to make adjustments that will impact the results of operations .
goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation - we test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review .
while the company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists , the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis .
the impairment analysis involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value .
if the carrying value exceeds the fair value , goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired .
to determine the fair value of goodwill , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model , supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies within the tobacco industry .
at december 31 , 2018 , the carrying value of our goodwill was $ 7.2 billion , which is related to ten reporting units , each of which consists of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics .
the estimated fair value of each of our ten reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of december 31 , 2018 .
to determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method .
we concluded that the fair value of our non- amortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value .
these discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant for forecasting operating cash flows , which are subject to changes in business conditions , such as volumes and prices , costs to produce , discount rates and estimated capital needs .
management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values are estimated , and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use .
since the march 28 , 2008 , spin-off from altria group , inc. , we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill or non-amortizable intangible assets .
marketing costs - we incur certain costs to support our products through programs that include advertising , marketing , consumer engagement and trade promotions .
the costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with u.s .
gaap .
recognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program .
for volume-based incentives provided to customers , management continually assesses and estimates , by customer , the likelihood of the customer's achieving the specified targets , and records the reduction of revenue as the sales are made .
for other trade promotions , management relies on estimated utilization rates that have been developed from historical experience .
changes in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program would not result in a material change in our financial position , results of operations or operating cash flows .
employee benefit plans - as discussed in item 8 , note 13 .
benefit plans to our consolidated financial statements , we provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees , including pensions , postretirement health care and postemployment benefits ( primarily severance ) .
we record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by u.s .
gaap .
these calculations include various actuarial assumptions , such as discount rates , assumed rates of return on plan assets , compensation increases , mortality , turnover rates and health care cost trend rates .
we review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so .
as permitted by u.s .
gaap , any effect of the modifications is generally amortized over future periods .
we believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans are reasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries .
weighted-average discount rate assumptions for pension and postretirement plan obligations at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 are as follows: .

Table:
	2018	2017
pension plans	1.61% ( 1.61 % )	1.51% ( 1.51 % )
postretirement plans	3.97% ( 3.97 % )	3.79% ( 3.79 % )

Post-table text:
we anticipate that assumption changes will increase 2019 pre-tax pension and postretirement expense to approximately $ 205 million as compared with approximately $ 160 million in 2018 , excluding amounts related to employee severance and early retirement programs .
the anticipated increase is primarily due to higher amortization out of other comprehensive earnings for unrecognized actuarial gains/ losses of $ 14 million , coupled with lower return on assets of $ 16 million , higher interest and service cost of $ 12 million and $ 4 million respectively , partially offset by other movements of $ 1 million .
weighted-average expected rate of return and discount rate assumptions have a significant effect on the amount of expense reported for the employee benefit plans .
a fifty-basis-point decrease in our discount rate would increase our 2019 pension and postretirement expense by approximately $ 50 million , and a fifty-basis-point increase in our discount rate would decrease our 2019 pension and postretirement .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is, then, the change over the year?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the pre-tax pension and postretirement expense in 2019?
[Turn 2] and what is it in 2018?
[Turn 3] what is, then, the change over the year?

Pre-table text:
inventory on hand , as well as our future purchase commitments with our suppliers , considering multiple factors , including demand forecasts , product life cycle , current sales levels , pricing strategy and cost trends .
if our review indicates that inventories of raw materials , components or finished products have become obsolete or are in excess of anticipated demand or that inventory cost exceeds net realizable value , we may be required to make adjustments that will impact the results of operations .
goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation - we test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review .
while the company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists , the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis .
the impairment analysis involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value .
if the carrying value exceeds the fair value , goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired .
to determine the fair value of goodwill , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model , supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies within the tobacco industry .
at december 31 , 2018 , the carrying value of our goodwill was $ 7.2 billion , which is related to ten reporting units , each of which consists of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics .
the estimated fair value of each of our ten reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of december 31 , 2018 .
to determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method .
we concluded that the fair value of our non- amortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value .
these discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant for forecasting operating cash flows , which are subject to changes in business conditions , such as volumes and prices , costs to produce , discount rates and estimated capital needs .
management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values are estimated , and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use .
since the march 28 , 2008 , spin-off from altria group , inc. , we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill or non-amortizable intangible assets .
marketing costs - we incur certain costs to support our products through programs that include advertising , marketing , consumer engagement and trade promotions .
the costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with u.s .
gaap .
recognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program .
for volume-based incentives provided to customers , management continually assesses and estimates , by customer , the likelihood of the customer's achieving the specified targets , and records the reduction of revenue as the sales are made .
for other trade promotions , management relies on estimated utilization rates that have been developed from historical experience .
changes in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program would not result in a material change in our financial position , results of operations or operating cash flows .
employee benefit plans - as discussed in item 8 , note 13 .
benefit plans to our consolidated financial statements , we provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees , including pensions , postretirement health care and postemployment benefits ( primarily severance ) .
we record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by u.s .
gaap .
these calculations include various actuarial assumptions , such as discount rates , assumed rates of return on plan assets , compensation increases , mortality , turnover rates and health care cost trend rates .
we review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so .
as permitted by u.s .
gaap , any effect of the modifications is generally amortized over future periods .
we believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans are reasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries .
weighted-average discount rate assumptions for pension and postretirement plan obligations at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 are as follows: .

Table:
	2018	2017
pension plans	1.61% ( 1.61 % )	1.51% ( 1.51 % )
postretirement plans	3.97% ( 3.97 % )	3.79% ( 3.79 % )

Post-table text:
we anticipate that assumption changes will increase 2019 pre-tax pension and postretirement expense to approximately $ 205 million as compared with approximately $ 160 million in 2018 , excluding amounts related to employee severance and early retirement programs .
the anticipated increase is primarily due to higher amortization out of other comprehensive earnings for unrecognized actuarial gains/ losses of $ 14 million , coupled with lower return on assets of $ 16 million , higher interest and service cost of $ 12 million and $ 4 million respectively , partially offset by other movements of $ 1 million .
weighted-average expected rate of return and discount rate assumptions have a significant effect on the amount of expense reported for the employee benefit plans .
a fifty-basis-point decrease in our discount rate would increase our 2019 pension and postretirement expense by approximately $ 50 million , and a fifty-basis-point increase in our discount rate would decrease our 2019 pension and postretirement .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the pre-tax pension and postretirement expense in 2018?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the pre-tax pension and postretirement expense in 2019?
[Turn 2] and what is it in 2018?
[Turn 3] what is, then, the change over the year?
[Turn 4] what is the pre-tax pension and postretirement expense in 2018?

Pre-table text:
inventory on hand , as well as our future purchase commitments with our suppliers , considering multiple factors , including demand forecasts , product life cycle , current sales levels , pricing strategy and cost trends .
if our review indicates that inventories of raw materials , components or finished products have become obsolete or are in excess of anticipated demand or that inventory cost exceeds net realizable value , we may be required to make adjustments that will impact the results of operations .
goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation - we test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review .
while the company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists , the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis .
the impairment analysis involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value .
if the carrying value exceeds the fair value , goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired .
to determine the fair value of goodwill , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model , supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies within the tobacco industry .
at december 31 , 2018 , the carrying value of our goodwill was $ 7.2 billion , which is related to ten reporting units , each of which consists of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics .
the estimated fair value of each of our ten reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of december 31 , 2018 .
to determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method .
we concluded that the fair value of our non- amortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value .
these discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant for forecasting operating cash flows , which are subject to changes in business conditions , such as volumes and prices , costs to produce , discount rates and estimated capital needs .
management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values are estimated , and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use .
since the march 28 , 2008 , spin-off from altria group , inc. , we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill or non-amortizable intangible assets .
marketing costs - we incur certain costs to support our products through programs that include advertising , marketing , consumer engagement and trade promotions .
the costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with u.s .
gaap .
recognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program .
for volume-based incentives provided to customers , management continually assesses and estimates , by customer , the likelihood of the customer's achieving the specified targets , and records the reduction of revenue as the sales are made .
for other trade promotions , management relies on estimated utilization rates that have been developed from historical experience .
changes in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program would not result in a material change in our financial position , results of operations or operating cash flows .
employee benefit plans - as discussed in item 8 , note 13 .
benefit plans to our consolidated financial statements , we provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees , including pensions , postretirement health care and postemployment benefits ( primarily severance ) .
we record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by u.s .
gaap .
these calculations include various actuarial assumptions , such as discount rates , assumed rates of return on plan assets , compensation increases , mortality , turnover rates and health care cost trend rates .
we review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so .
as permitted by u.s .
gaap , any effect of the modifications is generally amortized over future periods .
we believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans are reasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries .
weighted-average discount rate assumptions for pension and postretirement plan obligations at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 are as follows: .

Table:
	2018	2017
pension plans	1.61% ( 1.61 % )	1.51% ( 1.51 % )
postretirement plans	3.97% ( 3.97 % )	3.79% ( 3.79 % )

Post-table text:
we anticipate that assumption changes will increase 2019 pre-tax pension and postretirement expense to approximately $ 205 million as compared with approximately $ 160 million in 2018 , excluding amounts related to employee severance and early retirement programs .
the anticipated increase is primarily due to higher amortization out of other comprehensive earnings for unrecognized actuarial gains/ losses of $ 14 million , coupled with lower return on assets of $ 16 million , higher interest and service cost of $ 12 million and $ 4 million respectively , partially offset by other movements of $ 1 million .
weighted-average expected rate of return and discount rate assumptions have a significant effect on the amount of expense reported for the employee benefit plans .
a fifty-basis-point decrease in our discount rate would increase our 2019 pension and postretirement expense by approximately $ 50 million , and a fifty-basis-point increase in our discount rate would decrease our 2019 pension and postretirement .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2018 expense, in percentage?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the pre-tax pension and postretirement expense in 2019?
[Turn 2] and what is it in 2018?
[Turn 3] what is, then, the change over the year?
[Turn 4] what is the pre-tax pension and postretirement expense in 2018?
[Turn 5] and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2018 expense, in percentage?

Pre-table text:
inventory on hand , as well as our future purchase commitments with our suppliers , considering multiple factors , including demand forecasts , product life cycle , current sales levels , pricing strategy and cost trends .
if our review indicates that inventories of raw materials , components or finished products have become obsolete or are in excess of anticipated demand or that inventory cost exceeds net realizable value , we may be required to make adjustments that will impact the results of operations .
goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation - we test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review .
while the company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists , the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis .
the impairment analysis involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value .
if the carrying value exceeds the fair value , goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired .
to determine the fair value of goodwill , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model , supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies within the tobacco industry .
at december 31 , 2018 , the carrying value of our goodwill was $ 7.2 billion , which is related to ten reporting units , each of which consists of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics .
the estimated fair value of each of our ten reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of december 31 , 2018 .
to determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method .
we concluded that the fair value of our non- amortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value .
these discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant for forecasting operating cash flows , which are subject to changes in business conditions , such as volumes and prices , costs to produce , discount rates and estimated capital needs .
management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values are estimated , and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use .
since the march 28 , 2008 , spin-off from altria group , inc. , we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill or non-amortizable intangible assets .
marketing costs - we incur certain costs to support our products through programs that include advertising , marketing , consumer engagement and trade promotions .
the costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with u.s .
gaap .
recognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program .
for volume-based incentives provided to customers , management continually assesses and estimates , by customer , the likelihood of the customer's achieving the specified targets , and records the reduction of revenue as the sales are made .
for other trade promotions , management relies on estimated utilization rates that have been developed from historical experience .
changes in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program would not result in a material change in our financial position , results of operations or operating cash flows .
employee benefit plans - as discussed in item 8 , note 13 .
benefit plans to our consolidated financial statements , we provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees , including pensions , postretirement health care and postemployment benefits ( primarily severance ) .
we record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by u.s .
gaap .
these calculations include various actuarial assumptions , such as discount rates , assumed rates of return on plan assets , compensation increases , mortality , turnover rates and health care cost trend rates .
we review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so .
as permitted by u.s .
gaap , any effect of the modifications is generally amortized over future periods .
we believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans are reasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries .
weighted-average discount rate assumptions for pension and postretirement plan obligations at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 are as follows: .

Table:
	2018	2017
pension plans	1.61% ( 1.61 % )	1.51% ( 1.51 % )
postretirement plans	3.97% ( 3.97 % )	3.79% ( 3.79 % )

Post-table text:
we anticipate that assumption changes will increase 2019 pre-tax pension and postretirement expense to approximately $ 205 million as compared with approximately $ 160 million in 2018 , excluding amounts related to employee severance and early retirement programs .
the anticipated increase is primarily due to higher amortization out of other comprehensive earnings for unrecognized actuarial gains/ losses of $ 14 million , coupled with lower return on assets of $ 16 million , higher interest and service cost of $ 12 million and $ 4 million respectively , partially offset by other movements of $ 1 million .
weighted-average expected rate of return and discount rate assumptions have a significant effect on the amount of expense reported for the employee benefit plans .
a fifty-basis-point decrease in our discount rate would increase our 2019 pension and postretirement expense by approximately $ 50 million , and a fifty-basis-point increase in our discount rate would decrease our 2019 pension and postretirement .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the accrued value of tax related interest and penalties in 2011?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the accrued value of tax related interest and penalties in 2011?

Pre-table text:
december 31 , 2011 , the company recognized a decrease of $ 3 million of tax-related interest and penalties and had approximately $ 16 million accrued at december 31 , 2011 .
note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations .
management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks .
instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract .
the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities .
as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions .
total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 were as follows: .

Table:
( millions )	2013	2012
foreign currency exchange contracts	$ 517	$ 570
interest rate contracts	2400	2150
commodity contracts	361	320
total	$ 3278	$ 3040

Post-table text:
following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 , measured on a recurring basis .
level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market .
for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts .
level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability .
for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts .
the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve .
over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .
foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .
the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk .
level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement .
these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability .
the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 or december 29 , 2012. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the value decrease during the year?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the accrued value of tax related interest and penalties in 2011?
[Turn 2] what was the value decrease during the year?

Pre-table text:
december 31 , 2011 , the company recognized a decrease of $ 3 million of tax-related interest and penalties and had approximately $ 16 million accrued at december 31 , 2011 .
note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations .
management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks .
instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract .
the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities .
as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions .
total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 were as follows: .

Table:
( millions )	2013	2012
foreign currency exchange contracts	$ 517	$ 570
interest rate contracts	2400	2150
commodity contracts	361	320
total	$ 3278	$ 3040

Post-table text:
following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 , measured on a recurring basis .
level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market .
for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts .
level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability .
for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts .
the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve .
over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .
foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .
the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk .
level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement .
these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability .
the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 or december 29 , 2012. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the sum?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the accrued value of tax related interest and penalties in 2011?
[Turn 2] what was the value decrease during the year?
[Turn 3] what is the sum?

Pre-table text:
december 31 , 2011 , the company recognized a decrease of $ 3 million of tax-related interest and penalties and had approximately $ 16 million accrued at december 31 , 2011 .
note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations .
management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks .
instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract .
the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities .
as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions .
total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 were as follows: .

Table:
( millions )	2013	2012
foreign currency exchange contracts	$ 517	$ 570
interest rate contracts	2400	2150
commodity contracts	361	320
total	$ 3278	$ 3040

Post-table text:
following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 , measured on a recurring basis .
level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market .
for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts .
level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability .
for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts .
the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve .
over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .
foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .
the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk .
level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement .
these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability .
the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 or december 29 , 2012. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the value decrease during the year?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the accrued value of tax related interest and penalties in 2011?
[Turn 2] what was the value decrease during the year?
[Turn 3] what is the sum?
[Turn 4] what was the value decrease during the year?

Pre-table text:
december 31 , 2011 , the company recognized a decrease of $ 3 million of tax-related interest and penalties and had approximately $ 16 million accrued at december 31 , 2011 .
note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations .
management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks .
instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract .
the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities .
as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions .
total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 were as follows: .

Table:
( millions )	2013	2012
foreign currency exchange contracts	$ 517	$ 570
interest rate contracts	2400	2150
commodity contracts	361	320
total	$ 3278	$ 3040

Post-table text:
following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 , measured on a recurring basis .
level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market .
for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts .
level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability .
for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts .
the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve .
over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .
foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .
the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk .
level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement .
these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability .
the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 or december 29 , 2012. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the decreased value divided by the prior sum?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the accrued value of tax related interest and penalties in 2011?
[Turn 2] what was the value decrease during the year?
[Turn 3] what is the sum?
[Turn 4] what was the value decrease during the year?
[Turn 5] what is the decreased value divided by the prior sum?

Pre-table text:
december 31 , 2011 , the company recognized a decrease of $ 3 million of tax-related interest and penalties and had approximately $ 16 million accrued at december 31 , 2011 .
note 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations .
management uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks .
instruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract .
the company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities .
as a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions .
total notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 were as follows: .

Table:
( millions )	2013	2012
foreign currency exchange contracts	$ 517	$ 570
interest rate contracts	2400	2150
commodity contracts	361	320
total	$ 3278	$ 3040

Post-table text:
following is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 , measured on a recurring basis .
level 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market .
for the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts .
level 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability .
for the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts .
the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve .
over-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .
foreign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .
the company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk .
level 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement .
these inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability .
the company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 or december 29 , 2012. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the effect of volume/weather in net revenue during 2010, in millions?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the effect of volume/weather in net revenue during 2010, in millions?

Pre-table text:
entergy mississippi , inc .
management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2009 net revenue	$ 536.7
volume/weather	18.9
other	-0.3 ( 0.3 )
2010 net revenue	$ 555.3

Post-table text:
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector .
gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates .
fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand .
other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider .
other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory .
the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment .
taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year .
depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service .
interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what about in full dollars?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the effect of volume/weather in net revenue during 2010, in millions?
[Turn 2] what about in full dollars?

Pre-table text:
entergy mississippi , inc .
management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2009 net revenue	$ 536.7
volume/weather	18.9
other	-0.3 ( 0.3 )
2010 net revenue	$ 555.3

Post-table text:
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector .
gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates .
fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand .
other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider .
other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory .
the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment .
taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year .
depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service .
interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the increases in the gwh of billed lectricity usage in all sectors?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the effect of volume/weather in net revenue during 2010, in millions?
[Turn 2] what about in full dollars?
[Turn 3] what is the increases in the gwh of billed lectricity usage in all sectors?

Pre-table text:
entergy mississippi , inc .
management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2009 net revenue	$ 536.7
volume/weather	18.9
other	-0.3 ( 0.3 )
2010 net revenue	$ 555.3

Post-table text:
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector .
gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates .
fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand .
other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider .
other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory .
the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment .
taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year .
depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service .
interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the revenue per gwh?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the effect of volume/weather in net revenue during 2010, in millions?
[Turn 2] what about in full dollars?
[Turn 3] what is the increases in the gwh of billed lectricity usage in all sectors?
[Turn 4] what is the revenue per gwh?

Pre-table text:
entergy mississippi , inc .
management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2009 net revenue	$ 536.7
volume/weather	18.9
other	-0.3 ( 0.3 )
2010 net revenue	$ 555.3

Post-table text:
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector .
gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates .
fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand .
other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider .
other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory .
the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment .
taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year .
depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service .
interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.