[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the difference in sold receivables between 2007 and 2008?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the difference in sold receivables between 2007 and 2008?

Pre-table text:
interest rate cash flow hedges 2013 we report changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive loss until the hedged item affects earnings .
at both december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , we had reductions of $ 4 million recorded as an accumulated other comprehensive loss that is being amortized on a straight-line basis through september 30 , 2014 .
as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , we had no interest rate cash flow hedges outstanding .
earnings impact 2013 our use of derivative financial instruments had the following impact on pre-tax income for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 .

Table:
millions of dollars	2008	2007	2006
( increase ) /decrease in interest expense from interest rate hedging	$ 1	$ -8 ( 8 )	$ -8 ( 8 )
( increase ) /decrease in fuel expense from fuel derivatives	1	-1 ( 1 )	3
increase/ ( decrease ) in pre-tax income	$ 2	$ -9 ( 9 )	$ -5 ( 5 )

Post-table text:
fair value of debt instruments 2013 the fair value of our short- and long-term debt was estimated using quoted market prices , where available , or current borrowing rates .
at december 31 , 2008 , the fair value of total debt is approximately $ 247 million less than the carrying value .
at december 31 , 2007 , the fair value of total debt exceeded the carrying value by approximately $ 96 million .
at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , approximately $ 320 million and $ 181 million , respectively , of fixed-rate debt securities contained call provisions that allowed us to retire the debt instruments prior to final maturity , with the payment of fixed call premiums , or in certain cases , at par .
sale of receivables 2013 the railroad transfers most of its accounts receivable to union pacific receivables , inc .
( upri ) , a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary , as part of a sale of receivables facility .
upri sells , without recourse on a 364-day revolving basis , an undivided interest in such accounts receivable to investors .
the total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the facility was $ 700 million and $ 600 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the facility was $ 584 million and $ 600 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
upri reduced the outstanding undivided interest held by investors due to a decrease in available receivables at december 31 , 2008 .
the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors is not included in our consolidated financial statements .
the value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 1015 million and $ 1071 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 431 million and $ 471 million , respectively .
this retained interest is included in accounts receivable in our consolidated financial statements .
the interest sold to investors is sold at carrying value , which approximates fair value , and there is no gain or loss recognized from the transaction .
the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors could fluctuate based upon the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks , including default and dilution .
if default or dilution percentages were to increase one percentage point , the amount of eligible receivables would decrease by $ 6 million .
should our credit rating fall below investment grade , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would be reduced , and , in certain cases , the investors would have the right to discontinue the facility .
the railroad services the sold receivables ; however , the railroad does not recognize any servicing asset or liability as the servicing fees adequately compensate us for these responsibilities .
the railroad collected approximately $ 17.8 billion and $ 16.1 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
upri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
so what was the percentage change over this time?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the difference in sold receivables between 2007 and 2008?
[Turn 2] so what was the percentage change over this time?

Pre-table text:
interest rate cash flow hedges 2013 we report changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive loss until the hedged item affects earnings .
at both december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , we had reductions of $ 4 million recorded as an accumulated other comprehensive loss that is being amortized on a straight-line basis through september 30 , 2014 .
as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , we had no interest rate cash flow hedges outstanding .
earnings impact 2013 our use of derivative financial instruments had the following impact on pre-tax income for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 .

Table:
millions of dollars	2008	2007	2006
( increase ) /decrease in interest expense from interest rate hedging	$ 1	$ -8 ( 8 )	$ -8 ( 8 )
( increase ) /decrease in fuel expense from fuel derivatives	1	-1 ( 1 )	3
increase/ ( decrease ) in pre-tax income	$ 2	$ -9 ( 9 )	$ -5 ( 5 )

Post-table text:
fair value of debt instruments 2013 the fair value of our short- and long-term debt was estimated using quoted market prices , where available , or current borrowing rates .
at december 31 , 2008 , the fair value of total debt is approximately $ 247 million less than the carrying value .
at december 31 , 2007 , the fair value of total debt exceeded the carrying value by approximately $ 96 million .
at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , approximately $ 320 million and $ 181 million , respectively , of fixed-rate debt securities contained call provisions that allowed us to retire the debt instruments prior to final maturity , with the payment of fixed call premiums , or in certain cases , at par .
sale of receivables 2013 the railroad transfers most of its accounts receivable to union pacific receivables , inc .
( upri ) , a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary , as part of a sale of receivables facility .
upri sells , without recourse on a 364-day revolving basis , an undivided interest in such accounts receivable to investors .
the total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the facility was $ 700 million and $ 600 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the facility was $ 584 million and $ 600 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
upri reduced the outstanding undivided interest held by investors due to a decrease in available receivables at december 31 , 2008 .
the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors is not included in our consolidated financial statements .
the value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 1015 million and $ 1071 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 431 million and $ 471 million , respectively .
this retained interest is included in accounts receivable in our consolidated financial statements .
the interest sold to investors is sold at carrying value , which approximates fair value , and there is no gain or loss recognized from the transaction .
the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors could fluctuate based upon the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks , including default and dilution .
if default or dilution percentages were to increase one percentage point , the amount of eligible receivables would decrease by $ 6 million .
should our credit rating fall below investment grade , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would be reduced , and , in certain cases , the investors would have the right to discontinue the facility .
the railroad services the sold receivables ; however , the railroad does not recognize any servicing asset or liability as the servicing fees adequately compensate us for these responsibilities .
the railroad collected approximately $ 17.8 billion and $ 16.1 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
upri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the total of intangible assets, in millions?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of intangible assets, in millions?

Pre-table text:
software and will give the company a comprehensive design-to-silicon flow that links directly into the semiconductor manufacturing process .
integrating hpl 2019s yield management and test chip technologies into the company 2019s industry-leading dfm portfolio is also expected to enable customers to increase their productivity and improve profitability in the design and manufacture of advanced semiconductor devices .
purchase price .
the company paid $ 11.0 million in cash for all outstanding shares of hpl .
in addition , the company had a prior investment in hpl of approximately $ 1.9 million .
the total purchase consideration consisted of: .

Table:
	( in thousands )
cash paid	$ 11001
prior investment in hpl	1872
acquisition-related costs	2831
total purchase price	$ 15704

Post-table text:
acquisition-related costs of $ 2.8 million consist primarily of legal , tax and accounting fees of $ 1.6 million , $ 0.3 million of estimated facilities closure costs and other directly related charges , and $ 0.9 million in employee termination costs .
as of october 31 , 2006 , the company had paid $ 2.2 million of the acquisition related costs , of which $ 1.1 million were for professional services costs , $ 0.2 million were for facilities closure costs and $ 0.9 million were for employee termination costs .
the $ 0.6 million balance remaining at october 31 , 2006 consists of professional and tax-related service fees and facilities closure costs .
assets acquired .
the company acquired $ 8.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 5.1 million in core developed technology , $ 3.2 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in backlog to be amortized over two to four years .
approximately $ 0.8 million of the purchase price represents the fair value of acquired in-process research and development projects that have not yet reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use .
accordingly , the amount was immediately expensed and included in the company 2019s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 .
additionally , the company acquired tangible assets of $ 14.0 million and assumed liabilities of $ 10.9 million .
goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger was $ 3.4 million .
goodwill resulted primarily from the company 2019s expectation of synergies from the integration of hpl 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations .
other .
during the fiscal year 2006 , the company completed an asset acquisition for cash consideration of $ 1.5 million .
this acquisition is not considered material to the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet and results of operations .
fiscal 2005 acquisitions nassda corporation ( nassda ) the company acquired nassda on may 11 , 2005 .
reasons for the acquisition .
the company believes nassda 2019s full-chip circuit simulation and analysis software will broaden its offerings of transistor-level circuit simulation tools , particularly in the area of mixed-signal and memory design .
purchase price .
the company acquired all the outstanding shares of nassda for total cash consideration of $ 200.2 million , or $ 7.00 per share .
in addition , as required by the merger agreement , certain nassda officers , directors and employees who were defendants in certain preexisting litigation .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is that in thousands?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of intangible assets, in millions?
[Turn 2] what is that in thousands?

Pre-table text:
software and will give the company a comprehensive design-to-silicon flow that links directly into the semiconductor manufacturing process .
integrating hpl 2019s yield management and test chip technologies into the company 2019s industry-leading dfm portfolio is also expected to enable customers to increase their productivity and improve profitability in the design and manufacture of advanced semiconductor devices .
purchase price .
the company paid $ 11.0 million in cash for all outstanding shares of hpl .
in addition , the company had a prior investment in hpl of approximately $ 1.9 million .
the total purchase consideration consisted of: .

Table:
	( in thousands )
cash paid	$ 11001
prior investment in hpl	1872
acquisition-related costs	2831
total purchase price	$ 15704

Post-table text:
acquisition-related costs of $ 2.8 million consist primarily of legal , tax and accounting fees of $ 1.6 million , $ 0.3 million of estimated facilities closure costs and other directly related charges , and $ 0.9 million in employee termination costs .
as of october 31 , 2006 , the company had paid $ 2.2 million of the acquisition related costs , of which $ 1.1 million were for professional services costs , $ 0.2 million were for facilities closure costs and $ 0.9 million were for employee termination costs .
the $ 0.6 million balance remaining at october 31 , 2006 consists of professional and tax-related service fees and facilities closure costs .
assets acquired .
the company acquired $ 8.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 5.1 million in core developed technology , $ 3.2 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in backlog to be amortized over two to four years .
approximately $ 0.8 million of the purchase price represents the fair value of acquired in-process research and development projects that have not yet reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use .
accordingly , the amount was immediately expensed and included in the company 2019s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 .
additionally , the company acquired tangible assets of $ 14.0 million and assumed liabilities of $ 10.9 million .
goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger was $ 3.4 million .
goodwill resulted primarily from the company 2019s expectation of synergies from the integration of hpl 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations .
other .
during the fiscal year 2006 , the company completed an asset acquisition for cash consideration of $ 1.5 million .
this acquisition is not considered material to the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet and results of operations .
fiscal 2005 acquisitions nassda corporation ( nassda ) the company acquired nassda on may 11 , 2005 .
reasons for the acquisition .
the company believes nassda 2019s full-chip circuit simulation and analysis software will broaden its offerings of transistor-level circuit simulation tools , particularly in the area of mixed-signal and memory design .
purchase price .
the company acquired all the outstanding shares of nassda for total cash consideration of $ 200.2 million , or $ 7.00 per share .
in addition , as required by the merger agreement , certain nassda officers , directors and employees who were defendants in certain preexisting litigation .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what percentage did this total represent in relation to the total purchase price?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of intangible assets, in millions?
[Turn 2] what is that in thousands?
[Turn 3] and what percentage did this total represent in relation to the total purchase price?

Pre-table text:
software and will give the company a comprehensive design-to-silicon flow that links directly into the semiconductor manufacturing process .
integrating hpl 2019s yield management and test chip technologies into the company 2019s industry-leading dfm portfolio is also expected to enable customers to increase their productivity and improve profitability in the design and manufacture of advanced semiconductor devices .
purchase price .
the company paid $ 11.0 million in cash for all outstanding shares of hpl .
in addition , the company had a prior investment in hpl of approximately $ 1.9 million .
the total purchase consideration consisted of: .

Table:
	( in thousands )
cash paid	$ 11001
prior investment in hpl	1872
acquisition-related costs	2831
total purchase price	$ 15704

Post-table text:
acquisition-related costs of $ 2.8 million consist primarily of legal , tax and accounting fees of $ 1.6 million , $ 0.3 million of estimated facilities closure costs and other directly related charges , and $ 0.9 million in employee termination costs .
as of october 31 , 2006 , the company had paid $ 2.2 million of the acquisition related costs , of which $ 1.1 million were for professional services costs , $ 0.2 million were for facilities closure costs and $ 0.9 million were for employee termination costs .
the $ 0.6 million balance remaining at october 31 , 2006 consists of professional and tax-related service fees and facilities closure costs .
assets acquired .
the company acquired $ 8.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 5.1 million in core developed technology , $ 3.2 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in backlog to be amortized over two to four years .
approximately $ 0.8 million of the purchase price represents the fair value of acquired in-process research and development projects that have not yet reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use .
accordingly , the amount was immediately expensed and included in the company 2019s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 .
additionally , the company acquired tangible assets of $ 14.0 million and assumed liabilities of $ 10.9 million .
goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger was $ 3.4 million .
goodwill resulted primarily from the company 2019s expectation of synergies from the integration of hpl 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations .
other .
during the fiscal year 2006 , the company completed an asset acquisition for cash consideration of $ 1.5 million .
this acquisition is not considered material to the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet and results of operations .
fiscal 2005 acquisitions nassda corporation ( nassda ) the company acquired nassda on may 11 , 2005 .
reasons for the acquisition .
the company believes nassda 2019s full-chip circuit simulation and analysis software will broaden its offerings of transistor-level circuit simulation tools , particularly in the area of mixed-signal and memory design .
purchase price .
the company acquired all the outstanding shares of nassda for total cash consideration of $ 200.2 million , or $ 7.00 per share .
in addition , as required by the merger agreement , certain nassda officers , directors and employees who were defendants in certain preexisting litigation .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what percentage did the goodwill represent?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of intangible assets, in millions?
[Turn 2] what is that in thousands?
[Turn 3] and what percentage did this total represent in relation to the total purchase price?
[Turn 4] and what percentage did the goodwill represent?

Pre-table text:
software and will give the company a comprehensive design-to-silicon flow that links directly into the semiconductor manufacturing process .
integrating hpl 2019s yield management and test chip technologies into the company 2019s industry-leading dfm portfolio is also expected to enable customers to increase their productivity and improve profitability in the design and manufacture of advanced semiconductor devices .
purchase price .
the company paid $ 11.0 million in cash for all outstanding shares of hpl .
in addition , the company had a prior investment in hpl of approximately $ 1.9 million .
the total purchase consideration consisted of: .

Table:
	( in thousands )
cash paid	$ 11001
prior investment in hpl	1872
acquisition-related costs	2831
total purchase price	$ 15704

Post-table text:
acquisition-related costs of $ 2.8 million consist primarily of legal , tax and accounting fees of $ 1.6 million , $ 0.3 million of estimated facilities closure costs and other directly related charges , and $ 0.9 million in employee termination costs .
as of october 31 , 2006 , the company had paid $ 2.2 million of the acquisition related costs , of which $ 1.1 million were for professional services costs , $ 0.2 million were for facilities closure costs and $ 0.9 million were for employee termination costs .
the $ 0.6 million balance remaining at october 31 , 2006 consists of professional and tax-related service fees and facilities closure costs .
assets acquired .
the company acquired $ 8.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 5.1 million in core developed technology , $ 3.2 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in backlog to be amortized over two to four years .
approximately $ 0.8 million of the purchase price represents the fair value of acquired in-process research and development projects that have not yet reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use .
accordingly , the amount was immediately expensed and included in the company 2019s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 .
additionally , the company acquired tangible assets of $ 14.0 million and assumed liabilities of $ 10.9 million .
goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger was $ 3.4 million .
goodwill resulted primarily from the company 2019s expectation of synergies from the integration of hpl 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations .
other .
during the fiscal year 2006 , the company completed an asset acquisition for cash consideration of $ 1.5 million .
this acquisition is not considered material to the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet and results of operations .
fiscal 2005 acquisitions nassda corporation ( nassda ) the company acquired nassda on may 11 , 2005 .
reasons for the acquisition .
the company believes nassda 2019s full-chip circuit simulation and analysis software will broaden its offerings of transistor-level circuit simulation tools , particularly in the area of mixed-signal and memory design .
purchase price .
the company acquired all the outstanding shares of nassda for total cash consideration of $ 200.2 million , or $ 7.00 per share .
in addition , as required by the merger agreement , certain nassda officers , directors and employees who were defendants in certain preexisting litigation .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the value of north american consumer packaging net sales in 2008 times 1000?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of north american consumer packaging net sales in 2008 times 1000?

Pre-table text:
for uncoated freesheet paper and market pulp announced at the end of 2009 become effective .
input costs are expected to be higher due to wood supply constraints at the kwidzyn mill and annual tariff increases on energy in russia .
planned main- tenance outage costs are expected to be about flat , while operating costs should be favorable .
asian printing papers net sales were approx- imately $ 50 million in 2009 compared with approx- imately $ 20 million in both 2008 and 2007 .
operating earnings increased slightly in 2009 compared with 2008 , but were less than $ 1 million in all periods .
u.s .
market pulp net sales in 2009 totaled $ 575 million compared with $ 750 million in 2008 and $ 655 million in 2007 .
operating earnings in 2009 were $ 140 million ( a loss of $ 71 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and plant closure costs ) compared with a loss of $ 156 million ( a loss of $ 33 million excluding costs associated with the perma- nent shutdown of the bastrop mill ) in 2008 and earn- ings of $ 78 million in 2007 .
sales volumes in 2009 decreased from 2008 levels due to weaker global demand .
average sales price realizations were significantly lower as the decline in demand resulted in significant price declines for market pulp and smaller declines in fluff pulp .
input costs for wood , energy and chemicals decreased , and freight costs were significantly lower .
mill operating costs were favorable across all mills , and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower .
lack-of-order downtime in 2009 increased to approx- imately 540000 tons , including 480000 tons related to the permanent shutdown of our bastrop mill in the fourth quarter of 2008 , compared with 135000 tons in 2008 .
in the first quarter of 2010 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , reflecting improving customer demand for fluff pulp , offset by slightly seasonally weaker demand for softwood and hard- wood pulp in china .
average sales price realizations are expected to improve , reflecting the realization of previously announced sales price increases for fluff pulp , hardwood pulp and softwood pulp .
input costs are expected to increase for wood , energy and chemicals , and freight costs may also increase .
planned maintenance downtime costs will be higher , but operating costs should be about flat .
consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity .
in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix .
consumer packaging net sales in 2009 decreased 4% ( 4 % ) compared with 2008 and increased 1% ( 1 % ) compared with 2007 .
operating profits increased significantly compared with both 2008 and 2007 .
excluding alternative fuel mixture credits and facility closure costs , 2009 operating profits were sig- nificantly higher than 2008 and 57% ( 57 % ) higher than 2007 .
benefits from higher average sales price realizations ( $ 114 million ) , lower raw material and energy costs ( $ 114 million ) , lower freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , lower costs associated with the reorganiza- tion of the shorewood business ( $ 23 million ) , favor- able foreign exchange effects ( $ 14 million ) and other items ( $ 12 million ) were partially offset by lower sales volumes and increased lack-of-order downtime ( $ 145 million ) and costs associated with the perma- nent shutdown of the franklin mill ( $ 67 million ) .
additionally , operating profits in 2009 included $ 330 million of alternative fuel mixture credits .
consumer packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 .

Table:
in millions	2009	2008	2007
sales	$ 3060	$ 3195	$ 3015
operating profit	433	17	112

Post-table text:
north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.2 billion compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2008 and $ 2.4 billion in 2007 .
operating earnings in 2009 were $ 343 million ( $ 87 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and facility closure costs ) compared with $ 8 million ( $ 38 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2008 and $ 70 million in 2007 .
coated paperboard sales volumes were lower in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting weaker market conditions .
average sales price realizations were significantly higher , reflecting the full-year realization of price increases implemented in the second half of 2008 .
raw material costs for wood , energy and chemicals were significantly lower in 2009 , while freight costs were also favorable .
operating costs , however , were unfavorable and planned main- tenance downtime costs were higher .
lack-of-order downtime increased to 300000 tons in 2009 from 15000 tons in 2008 due to weak demand .
operating results in 2009 include income of $ 330 million for alternative fuel mixture credits and $ 67 million of expenses for shutdown costs for the franklin mill .
foodservice sales volumes were lower in 2009 than in 2008 due to generally weak world-wide economic conditions .
average sales price realizations were .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is that divided by total consumer packaging sales in 2008?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of north american consumer packaging net sales in 2008 times 1000?
[Turn 2] what is that divided by total consumer packaging sales in 2008?

Pre-table text:
for uncoated freesheet paper and market pulp announced at the end of 2009 become effective .
input costs are expected to be higher due to wood supply constraints at the kwidzyn mill and annual tariff increases on energy in russia .
planned main- tenance outage costs are expected to be about flat , while operating costs should be favorable .
asian printing papers net sales were approx- imately $ 50 million in 2009 compared with approx- imately $ 20 million in both 2008 and 2007 .
operating earnings increased slightly in 2009 compared with 2008 , but were less than $ 1 million in all periods .
u.s .
market pulp net sales in 2009 totaled $ 575 million compared with $ 750 million in 2008 and $ 655 million in 2007 .
operating earnings in 2009 were $ 140 million ( a loss of $ 71 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and plant closure costs ) compared with a loss of $ 156 million ( a loss of $ 33 million excluding costs associated with the perma- nent shutdown of the bastrop mill ) in 2008 and earn- ings of $ 78 million in 2007 .
sales volumes in 2009 decreased from 2008 levels due to weaker global demand .
average sales price realizations were significantly lower as the decline in demand resulted in significant price declines for market pulp and smaller declines in fluff pulp .
input costs for wood , energy and chemicals decreased , and freight costs were significantly lower .
mill operating costs were favorable across all mills , and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower .
lack-of-order downtime in 2009 increased to approx- imately 540000 tons , including 480000 tons related to the permanent shutdown of our bastrop mill in the fourth quarter of 2008 , compared with 135000 tons in 2008 .
in the first quarter of 2010 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , reflecting improving customer demand for fluff pulp , offset by slightly seasonally weaker demand for softwood and hard- wood pulp in china .
average sales price realizations are expected to improve , reflecting the realization of previously announced sales price increases for fluff pulp , hardwood pulp and softwood pulp .
input costs are expected to increase for wood , energy and chemicals , and freight costs may also increase .
planned maintenance downtime costs will be higher , but operating costs should be about flat .
consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity .
in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix .
consumer packaging net sales in 2009 decreased 4% ( 4 % ) compared with 2008 and increased 1% ( 1 % ) compared with 2007 .
operating profits increased significantly compared with both 2008 and 2007 .
excluding alternative fuel mixture credits and facility closure costs , 2009 operating profits were sig- nificantly higher than 2008 and 57% ( 57 % ) higher than 2007 .
benefits from higher average sales price realizations ( $ 114 million ) , lower raw material and energy costs ( $ 114 million ) , lower freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , lower costs associated with the reorganiza- tion of the shorewood business ( $ 23 million ) , favor- able foreign exchange effects ( $ 14 million ) and other items ( $ 12 million ) were partially offset by lower sales volumes and increased lack-of-order downtime ( $ 145 million ) and costs associated with the perma- nent shutdown of the franklin mill ( $ 67 million ) .
additionally , operating profits in 2009 included $ 330 million of alternative fuel mixture credits .
consumer packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 .

Table:
in millions	2009	2008	2007
sales	$ 3060	$ 3195	$ 3015
operating profit	433	17	112

Post-table text:
north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.2 billion compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2008 and $ 2.4 billion in 2007 .
operating earnings in 2009 were $ 343 million ( $ 87 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and facility closure costs ) compared with $ 8 million ( $ 38 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2008 and $ 70 million in 2007 .
coated paperboard sales volumes were lower in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting weaker market conditions .
average sales price realizations were significantly higher , reflecting the full-year realization of price increases implemented in the second half of 2008 .
raw material costs for wood , energy and chemicals were significantly lower in 2009 , while freight costs were also favorable .
operating costs , however , were unfavorable and planned main- tenance downtime costs were higher .
lack-of-order downtime increased to 300000 tons in 2009 from 15000 tons in 2008 due to weak demand .
operating results in 2009 include income of $ 330 million for alternative fuel mixture credits and $ 67 million of expenses for shutdown costs for the franklin mill .
foodservice sales volumes were lower in 2009 than in 2008 due to generally weak world-wide economic conditions .
average sales price realizations were .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the change in the fair value per share from 2014 to 2016?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the fair value per share from 2014 to 2016?

Pre-table text:
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 13 .
common stock ( continued ) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program ( the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019 ) .
under the nonemployee directors program , upon a director 2019s initial election to the board , the director receives an initial grant of stock options or restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $ 0.2 million , not to exceed 20000 shares .
these grants vest over three years from the date of grant , subject to the director 2019s continued service .
in addition , annually each nonemployee director may receive up to 40000 stock options or 16000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock , or a combination thereof , provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $ 0.2 million .
these grants generally vest over one year from the date of grant .
under the nonemployee directors program , an aggregate of 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance .
the company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees ( collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) .
under the espp , eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase .
under the espp , employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% ( 12 % ) of their compensation for common stock purchases , subject to certain limitations .
the espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states , to the extent permitted by local law .
the espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code .
the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 13.8 million shares .
the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables .
the risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s .
treasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award .
expected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards lifesciences 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards lifesciences 2019 stock .
the expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award , as well as historical exercise behavior , and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding .
the company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) .
the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards .

Table:
	2016	2015	2014
average risk-free interest rate	1.1% ( 1.1 % )	1.4% ( 1.4 % )	1.5% ( 1.5 % )
expected dividend yield	none	none	none
expected volatility	33% ( 33 % )	30% ( 30 % )	31% ( 31 % )
expected life ( years )	4.5	4.6	4.6
fair value per share	$ 31.00	$ 18.13	$ 11.75

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was that fair value in 2014?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the fair value per share from 2014 to 2016?
[Turn 2] and what was that fair value in 2014?

Pre-table text:
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 13 .
common stock ( continued ) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program ( the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019 ) .
under the nonemployee directors program , upon a director 2019s initial election to the board , the director receives an initial grant of stock options or restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $ 0.2 million , not to exceed 20000 shares .
these grants vest over three years from the date of grant , subject to the director 2019s continued service .
in addition , annually each nonemployee director may receive up to 40000 stock options or 16000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock , or a combination thereof , provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $ 0.2 million .
these grants generally vest over one year from the date of grant .
under the nonemployee directors program , an aggregate of 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance .
the company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees ( collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) .
under the espp , eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase .
under the espp , employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% ( 12 % ) of their compensation for common stock purchases , subject to certain limitations .
the espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states , to the extent permitted by local law .
the espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code .
the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 13.8 million shares .
the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables .
the risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s .
treasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award .
expected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards lifesciences 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards lifesciences 2019 stock .
the expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award , as well as historical exercise behavior , and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding .
the company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) .
the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards .

Table:
	2016	2015	2014
average risk-free interest rate	1.1% ( 1.1 % )	1.4% ( 1.4 % )	1.5% ( 1.5 % )
expected dividend yield	none	none	none
expected volatility	33% ( 33 % )	30% ( 30 % )	31% ( 31 % )
expected life ( years )	4.5	4.6	4.6
fair value per share	$ 31.00	$ 18.13	$ 11.75

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2014 fair value, in percentage?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the fair value per share from 2014 to 2016?
[Turn 2] and what was that fair value in 2014?
[Turn 3] how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2014 fair value, in percentage?

Pre-table text:
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 13 .
common stock ( continued ) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program ( the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019 ) .
under the nonemployee directors program , upon a director 2019s initial election to the board , the director receives an initial grant of stock options or restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $ 0.2 million , not to exceed 20000 shares .
these grants vest over three years from the date of grant , subject to the director 2019s continued service .
in addition , annually each nonemployee director may receive up to 40000 stock options or 16000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock , or a combination thereof , provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $ 0.2 million .
these grants generally vest over one year from the date of grant .
under the nonemployee directors program , an aggregate of 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance .
the company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees ( collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) .
under the espp , eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase .
under the espp , employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% ( 12 % ) of their compensation for common stock purchases , subject to certain limitations .
the espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states , to the extent permitted by local law .
the espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code .
the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 13.8 million shares .
the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables .
the risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s .
treasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award .
expected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards lifesciences 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards lifesciences 2019 stock .
the expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award , as well as historical exercise behavior , and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding .
the company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) .
the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards .

Table:
	2016	2015	2014
average risk-free interest rate	1.1% ( 1.1 % )	1.4% ( 1.4 % )	1.5% ( 1.5 % )
expected dividend yield	none	none	none
expected volatility	33% ( 33 % )	30% ( 30 % )	31% ( 31 % )
expected life ( years )	4.5	4.6	4.6
fair value per share	$ 31.00	$ 18.13	$ 11.75

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the change in the value of the cadence design systems inc . from 2001 to 2006?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the value of the cadence design systems inc . from 2001 to 2006?

Pre-table text:
the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc .
nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc .
all rights reserved .
www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .

Table:
	december 29 2001	december 28 2002	january 3 2004	january 1 2005	december 31 2005	december 30 2006
cadence design systems inc .	100.00	54.38	81.52	61.65	75.54	79.96
s & p 500	100.00	77.90	100.24	111.15	116.61	135.03
nasdaq composite	100.00	71.97	107.18	117.07	120.50	137.02
s & p information technology	100.00	62.59	92.14	94.50	95.44	103.47

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what is this change as a percent of that value in 2001?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the value of the cadence design systems inc . from 2001 to 2006?
[Turn 2] and what is this change as a percent of that value in 2001?

Pre-table text:
the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc .
nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc .
all rights reserved .
www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .

Table:
	december 29 2001	december 28 2002	january 3 2004	january 1 2005	december 31 2005	december 30 2006
cadence design systems inc .	100.00	54.38	81.52	61.65	75.54	79.96
s & p 500	100.00	77.90	100.24	111.15	116.61	135.03
nasdaq composite	100.00	71.97	107.18	117.07	120.50	137.02
s & p information technology	100.00	62.59	92.14	94.50	95.44	103.47

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and only from 2001 to 2005, what was that change for the s&p500 stock?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the value of the cadence design systems inc . from 2001 to 2006?
[Turn 2] and what is this change as a percent of that value in 2001?
[Turn 3] and only from 2001 to 2005, what was that change for the s&p500 stock?

Pre-table text:
the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc .
nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc .
all rights reserved .
www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .

Table:
	december 29 2001	december 28 2002	january 3 2004	january 1 2005	december 31 2005	december 30 2006
cadence design systems inc .	100.00	54.38	81.52	61.65	75.54	79.96
s & p 500	100.00	77.90	100.24	111.15	116.61	135.03
nasdaq composite	100.00	71.97	107.18	117.07	120.50	137.02
s & p information technology	100.00	62.59	92.14	94.50	95.44	103.47

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is this s&p500 change as a portion of its value in 2001?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the change in the value of the cadence design systems inc . from 2001 to 2006?
[Turn 2] and what is this change as a percent of that value in 2001?
[Turn 3] and only from 2001 to 2005, what was that change for the s&p500 stock?
[Turn 4] what is this s&p500 change as a portion of its value in 2001?

Pre-table text:
the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc .
nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc .
all rights reserved .
www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .

Table:
	december 29 2001	december 28 2002	january 3 2004	january 1 2005	december 31 2005	december 30 2006
cadence design systems inc .	100.00	54.38	81.52	61.65	75.54	79.96
s & p 500	100.00	77.90	100.24	111.15	116.61	135.03
nasdaq composite	100.00	71.97	107.18	117.07	120.50	137.02
s & p information technology	100.00	62.59	92.14	94.50	95.44	103.47

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the value of inventories in 2018?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the value of inventories in 2018?

Pre-table text:
note 6 : inventories we use the last-in , first-out ( lifo ) method for the majority of our inventories located in the continental u.s .
other inventories are valued by the first-in , first-out ( fifo ) method .
fifo cost approximates current replacement cost .
inventories measured using lifo must be valued at the lower of cost or market .
inventories measured using fifo must be valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value .
inventories at december 31 consisted of the following: .

Table:
	2018	2017
finished products	$ 988.1	$ 1211.4
work in process	2628.2	2697.7
raw materials and supplies	506.5	488.8
total ( approximates replacement cost )	4122.8	4397.9
increase ( reduction ) to lifo cost	-11.0 ( 11.0 )	60.4
inventories	$ 4111.8	$ 4458.3

Post-table text:
inventories valued under the lifo method comprised $ 1.57 billion and $ 1.56 billion of total inventories at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .
note 7 : financial instruments financial instruments that potentially subject us to credit risk consist principally of trade receivables and interest- bearing investments .
wholesale distributors of life-science products account for a substantial portion of our trade receivables ; collateral is generally not required .
we seek to mitigate the risk associated with this concentration through our ongoing credit-review procedures and insurance .
a large portion of our cash is held by a few major financial institutions .
we monitor our exposures with these institutions and do not expect any of these institutions to fail to meet their obligations .
major financial institutions represent the largest component of our investments in corporate debt securities .
in accordance with documented corporate risk-management policies , we monitor the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution or corporate issuer .
we are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to risk-management instruments but do not expect any counterparties to fail to meet their obligations given their high credit ratings .
we consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents .
the cost of these investments approximates fair value .
our equity investments are accounted for using three different methods depending on the type of equity investment : 2022 investments in companies over which we have significant influence but not a controlling interest are accounted for using the equity method , with our share of earnings or losses reported in other-net , ( income ) expense .
2022 for equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values , we measure these investments at cost , less any impairment , plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or similar investment of the same issuer .
any change in recorded value is recorded in other-net , ( income ) expense .
2022 our public equity investments are measured and carried at fair value .
any change in fair value is recognized in other-net , ( income ) expense .
we review equity investments other than public equity investments for indications of impairment on a regular basis .
our derivative activities are initiated within the guidelines of documented corporate risk-management policies and are intended to offset losses and gains on the assets , liabilities , and transactions being hedged .
management reviews the correlation and effectiveness of our derivatives on a quarterly basis. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the value in 2017?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the value of inventories in 2018?
[Turn 2] what was the value in 2017?

Pre-table text:
note 6 : inventories we use the last-in , first-out ( lifo ) method for the majority of our inventories located in the continental u.s .
other inventories are valued by the first-in , first-out ( fifo ) method .
fifo cost approximates current replacement cost .
inventories measured using lifo must be valued at the lower of cost or market .
inventories measured using fifo must be valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value .
inventories at december 31 consisted of the following: .

Table:
	2018	2017
finished products	$ 988.1	$ 1211.4
work in process	2628.2	2697.7
raw materials and supplies	506.5	488.8
total ( approximates replacement cost )	4122.8	4397.9
increase ( reduction ) to lifo cost	-11.0 ( 11.0 )	60.4
inventories	$ 4111.8	$ 4458.3

Post-table text:
inventories valued under the lifo method comprised $ 1.57 billion and $ 1.56 billion of total inventories at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .
note 7 : financial instruments financial instruments that potentially subject us to credit risk consist principally of trade receivables and interest- bearing investments .
wholesale distributors of life-science products account for a substantial portion of our trade receivables ; collateral is generally not required .
we seek to mitigate the risk associated with this concentration through our ongoing credit-review procedures and insurance .
a large portion of our cash is held by a few major financial institutions .
we monitor our exposures with these institutions and do not expect any of these institutions to fail to meet their obligations .
major financial institutions represent the largest component of our investments in corporate debt securities .
in accordance with documented corporate risk-management policies , we monitor the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution or corporate issuer .
we are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to risk-management instruments but do not expect any counterparties to fail to meet their obligations given their high credit ratings .
we consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents .
the cost of these investments approximates fair value .
our equity investments are accounted for using three different methods depending on the type of equity investment : 2022 investments in companies over which we have significant influence but not a controlling interest are accounted for using the equity method , with our share of earnings or losses reported in other-net , ( income ) expense .
2022 for equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values , we measure these investments at cost , less any impairment , plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or similar investment of the same issuer .
any change in recorded value is recorded in other-net , ( income ) expense .
2022 our public equity investments are measured and carried at fair value .
any change in fair value is recognized in other-net , ( income ) expense .
we review equity investments other than public equity investments for indications of impairment on a regular basis .
our derivative activities are initiated within the guidelines of documented corporate risk-management policies and are intended to offset losses and gains on the assets , liabilities , and transactions being hedged .
management reviews the correlation and effectiveness of our derivatives on a quarterly basis. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the net change in values?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the value of inventories in 2018?
[Turn 2] what was the value in 2017?
[Turn 3] what is the net change in values?

Pre-table text:
note 6 : inventories we use the last-in , first-out ( lifo ) method for the majority of our inventories located in the continental u.s .
other inventories are valued by the first-in , first-out ( fifo ) method .
fifo cost approximates current replacement cost .
inventories measured using lifo must be valued at the lower of cost or market .
inventories measured using fifo must be valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value .
inventories at december 31 consisted of the following: .

Table:
	2018	2017
finished products	$ 988.1	$ 1211.4
work in process	2628.2	2697.7
raw materials and supplies	506.5	488.8
total ( approximates replacement cost )	4122.8	4397.9
increase ( reduction ) to lifo cost	-11.0 ( 11.0 )	60.4
inventories	$ 4111.8	$ 4458.3

Post-table text:
inventories valued under the lifo method comprised $ 1.57 billion and $ 1.56 billion of total inventories at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .
note 7 : financial instruments financial instruments that potentially subject us to credit risk consist principally of trade receivables and interest- bearing investments .
wholesale distributors of life-science products account for a substantial portion of our trade receivables ; collateral is generally not required .
we seek to mitigate the risk associated with this concentration through our ongoing credit-review procedures and insurance .
a large portion of our cash is held by a few major financial institutions .
we monitor our exposures with these institutions and do not expect any of these institutions to fail to meet their obligations .
major financial institutions represent the largest component of our investments in corporate debt securities .
in accordance with documented corporate risk-management policies , we monitor the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution or corporate issuer .
we are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to risk-management instruments but do not expect any counterparties to fail to meet their obligations given their high credit ratings .
we consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents .
the cost of these investments approximates fair value .
our equity investments are accounted for using three different methods depending on the type of equity investment : 2022 investments in companies over which we have significant influence but not a controlling interest are accounted for using the equity method , with our share of earnings or losses reported in other-net , ( income ) expense .
2022 for equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values , we measure these investments at cost , less any impairment , plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or similar investment of the same issuer .
any change in recorded value is recorded in other-net , ( income ) expense .
2022 our public equity investments are measured and carried at fair value .
any change in fair value is recognized in other-net , ( income ) expense .
we review equity investments other than public equity investments for indications of impairment on a regular basis .
our derivative activities are initiated within the guidelines of documented corporate risk-management policies and are intended to offset losses and gains on the assets , liabilities , and transactions being hedged .
management reviews the correlation and effectiveness of our derivatives on a quarterly basis. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the percent change?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the value of inventories in 2018?
[Turn 2] what was the value in 2017?
[Turn 3] what is the net change in values?
[Turn 4] what is the percent change?

Pre-table text:
note 6 : inventories we use the last-in , first-out ( lifo ) method for the majority of our inventories located in the continental u.s .
other inventories are valued by the first-in , first-out ( fifo ) method .
fifo cost approximates current replacement cost .
inventories measured using lifo must be valued at the lower of cost or market .
inventories measured using fifo must be valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value .
inventories at december 31 consisted of the following: .

Table:
	2018	2017
finished products	$ 988.1	$ 1211.4
work in process	2628.2	2697.7
raw materials and supplies	506.5	488.8
total ( approximates replacement cost )	4122.8	4397.9
increase ( reduction ) to lifo cost	-11.0 ( 11.0 )	60.4
inventories	$ 4111.8	$ 4458.3

Post-table text:
inventories valued under the lifo method comprised $ 1.57 billion and $ 1.56 billion of total inventories at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .
note 7 : financial instruments financial instruments that potentially subject us to credit risk consist principally of trade receivables and interest- bearing investments .
wholesale distributors of life-science products account for a substantial portion of our trade receivables ; collateral is generally not required .
we seek to mitigate the risk associated with this concentration through our ongoing credit-review procedures and insurance .
a large portion of our cash is held by a few major financial institutions .
we monitor our exposures with these institutions and do not expect any of these institutions to fail to meet their obligations .
major financial institutions represent the largest component of our investments in corporate debt securities .
in accordance with documented corporate risk-management policies , we monitor the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution or corporate issuer .
we are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to risk-management instruments but do not expect any counterparties to fail to meet their obligations given their high credit ratings .
we consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents .
the cost of these investments approximates fair value .
our equity investments are accounted for using three different methods depending on the type of equity investment : 2022 investments in companies over which we have significant influence but not a controlling interest are accounted for using the equity method , with our share of earnings or losses reported in other-net , ( income ) expense .
2022 for equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values , we measure these investments at cost , less any impairment , plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or similar investment of the same issuer .
any change in recorded value is recorded in other-net , ( income ) expense .
2022 our public equity investments are measured and carried at fair value .
any change in fair value is recognized in other-net , ( income ) expense .
we review equity investments other than public equity investments for indications of impairment on a regular basis .
our derivative activities are initiated within the guidelines of documented corporate risk-management policies and are intended to offset losses and gains on the assets , liabilities , and transactions being hedged .
management reviews the correlation and effectiveness of our derivatives on a quarterly basis. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the fair value per share in 2015?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the fair value per share in 2015?

Pre-table text:
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 13 .
common stock ( continued ) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program ( the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019 ) .
under the nonemployee directors program , upon a director 2019s initial election to the board , the director receives an initial grant of stock options or restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $ 0.2 million , not to exceed 20000 shares .
these grants vest over three years from the date of grant , subject to the director 2019s continued service .
in addition , annually each nonemployee director may receive up to 40000 stock options or 16000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock , or a combination thereof , provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $ 0.2 million .
these grants generally vest over one year from the date of grant .
under the nonemployee directors program , an aggregate of 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance .
the company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees ( collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) .
under the espp , eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase .
under the espp , employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% ( 12 % ) of their compensation for common stock purchases , subject to certain limitations .
the espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states , to the extent permitted by local law .
the espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code .
the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 13.8 million shares .
the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables .
the risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s .
treasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award .
expected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards lifesciences 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards lifesciences 2019 stock .
the expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award , as well as historical exercise behavior , and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding .
the company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) .
the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards .

Table:
	2016	2015	2014
average risk-free interest rate	1.1% ( 1.1 % )	1.4% ( 1.4 % )	1.5% ( 1.5 % )
expected dividend yield	none	none	none
expected volatility	33% ( 33 % )	30% ( 30 % )	31% ( 31 % )
expected life ( years )	4.5	4.6	4.6
fair value per share	$ 31.00	$ 18.13	$ 11.75

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is it in 2014?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the fair value per share in 2015?
[Turn 2] what is it in 2014?

Pre-table text:
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 13 .
common stock ( continued ) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program ( the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019 ) .
under the nonemployee directors program , upon a director 2019s initial election to the board , the director receives an initial grant of stock options or restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $ 0.2 million , not to exceed 20000 shares .
these grants vest over three years from the date of grant , subject to the director 2019s continued service .
in addition , annually each nonemployee director may receive up to 40000 stock options or 16000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock , or a combination thereof , provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $ 0.2 million .
these grants generally vest over one year from the date of grant .
under the nonemployee directors program , an aggregate of 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance .
the company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees ( collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) .
under the espp , eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase .
under the espp , employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% ( 12 % ) of their compensation for common stock purchases , subject to certain limitations .
the espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states , to the extent permitted by local law .
the espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code .
the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 13.8 million shares .
the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables .
the risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s .
treasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award .
expected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards lifesciences 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards lifesciences 2019 stock .
the expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award , as well as historical exercise behavior , and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding .
the company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) .
the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards .

Table:
	2016	2015	2014
average risk-free interest rate	1.1% ( 1.1 % )	1.4% ( 1.4 % )	1.5% ( 1.5 % )
expected dividend yield	none	none	none
expected volatility	33% ( 33 % )	30% ( 30 % )	31% ( 31 % )
expected life ( years )	4.5	4.6	4.6
fair value per share	$ 31.00	$ 18.13	$ 11.75

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the net change?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the fair value per share in 2015?
[Turn 2] what is it in 2014?
[Turn 3] what is the net change?

Pre-table text:
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 13 .
common stock ( continued ) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program ( the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019 ) .
under the nonemployee directors program , upon a director 2019s initial election to the board , the director receives an initial grant of stock options or restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $ 0.2 million , not to exceed 20000 shares .
these grants vest over three years from the date of grant , subject to the director 2019s continued service .
in addition , annually each nonemployee director may receive up to 40000 stock options or 16000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock , or a combination thereof , provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $ 0.2 million .
these grants generally vest over one year from the date of grant .
under the nonemployee directors program , an aggregate of 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance .
the company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees ( collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) .
under the espp , eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase .
under the espp , employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% ( 12 % ) of their compensation for common stock purchases , subject to certain limitations .
the espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states , to the extent permitted by local law .
the espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code .
the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 13.8 million shares .
the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables .
the risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s .
treasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award .
expected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards lifesciences 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards lifesciences 2019 stock .
the expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award , as well as historical exercise behavior , and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding .
the company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) .
the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards .

Table:
	2016	2015	2014
average risk-free interest rate	1.1% ( 1.1 % )	1.4% ( 1.4 % )	1.5% ( 1.5 % )
expected dividend yield	none	none	none
expected volatility	33% ( 33 % )	30% ( 30 % )	31% ( 31 % )
expected life ( years )	4.5	4.6	4.6
fair value per share	$ 31.00	$ 18.13	$ 11.75

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.