[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the balance in the air value of our foreign currency forward contracts in 2009?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the balance in the air value of our foreign currency forward contracts in 2009?

Pre-table text:
addition , we are exposed to gains and losses resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on transactions generated by our international subsidiaries in currencies other than their local currencies .
these gains and losses are primarily driven by inter-company transactions .
these exposures are included in other income ( expense ) , net on the consolidated statements of income .
since 2007 , we have used foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk from exchange rate fluctuations on inter-company transactions and projected inventory purchases for our canadian subsidiary .
beginning in december 2008 , we began using foreign currency forward contracts in order to reduce the risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on inter-company transactions for our european subsidiary .
we do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes .
based on the foreign currency forward contracts outstanding as of december 31 , 2009 , we receive us dollars in exchange for canadian dollars at a weighted average contractual forward foreign currency exchange rate of 1.04 cad per $ 1.00 and us dollars in exchange for euros at a weighted average contractual foreign currency exchange rate of 0.70 eur per $ 1.00 .
as of december 31 , 2009 , the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our canadian subsidiary was $ 15.4 million with contract maturities of 1 month , and the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our european subsidiary was $ 56.0 million with contract maturities of 1 month .
the foreign currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow hedges , and accordingly , changes in their fair value are recorded in other income ( expense ) , net on the consolidated statements of income .
the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts was $ 0.3 million and $ 1.2 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
these amounts are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet .
refer to note 9 for a discussion of the fair value measurements .
other income ( expense ) , net included the following amounts related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and derivative foreign currency forward contracts: .

Table:
year ended december 31 , ( in thousands )	year ended december 31 , 2009	year ended december 31 , 2008	2007
unrealized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses )	$ 5222	$ -5459 ( 5459 )	$ 2567
realized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses )	-261 ( 261 )	-2166 ( 2166 )	174
unrealized derivative gains ( losses )	-1060 ( 1060 )	1650	-243 ( 243 )
realized derivative losses	-4412 ( 4412 )	-204 ( 204 )	-469 ( 469 )

Post-table text:
although we have entered into foreign currency forward contracts to minimize some of the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on future cash flows , we cannot be assured that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations .
inflation inflationary factors such as increases in the cost of our product and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results .
although we do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations to date , a high rate of inflation in the future may have an adverse effect on our ability to maintain current levels of gross margin and selling , general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues if the selling prices of our products do not increase with these increased costs. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what about in 2008?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the balance in the air value of our foreign currency forward contracts in 2009?
[Turn 2] what about in 2008?

Pre-table text:
addition , we are exposed to gains and losses resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on transactions generated by our international subsidiaries in currencies other than their local currencies .
these gains and losses are primarily driven by inter-company transactions .
these exposures are included in other income ( expense ) , net on the consolidated statements of income .
since 2007 , we have used foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk from exchange rate fluctuations on inter-company transactions and projected inventory purchases for our canadian subsidiary .
beginning in december 2008 , we began using foreign currency forward contracts in order to reduce the risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on inter-company transactions for our european subsidiary .
we do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes .
based on the foreign currency forward contracts outstanding as of december 31 , 2009 , we receive us dollars in exchange for canadian dollars at a weighted average contractual forward foreign currency exchange rate of 1.04 cad per $ 1.00 and us dollars in exchange for euros at a weighted average contractual foreign currency exchange rate of 0.70 eur per $ 1.00 .
as of december 31 , 2009 , the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our canadian subsidiary was $ 15.4 million with contract maturities of 1 month , and the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our european subsidiary was $ 56.0 million with contract maturities of 1 month .
the foreign currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow hedges , and accordingly , changes in their fair value are recorded in other income ( expense ) , net on the consolidated statements of income .
the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts was $ 0.3 million and $ 1.2 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
these amounts are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet .
refer to note 9 for a discussion of the fair value measurements .
other income ( expense ) , net included the following amounts related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and derivative foreign currency forward contracts: .

Table:
year ended december 31 , ( in thousands )	year ended december 31 , 2009	year ended december 31 , 2008	2007
unrealized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses )	$ 5222	$ -5459 ( 5459 )	$ 2567
realized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses )	-261 ( 261 )	-2166 ( 2166 )	174
unrealized derivative gains ( losses )	-1060 ( 1060 )	1650	-243 ( 243 )
realized derivative losses	-4412 ( 4412 )	-204 ( 204 )	-469 ( 469 )

Post-table text:
although we have entered into foreign currency forward contracts to minimize some of the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on future cash flows , we cannot be assured that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations .
inflation inflationary factors such as increases in the cost of our product and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results .
although we do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations to date , a high rate of inflation in the future may have an adverse effect on our ability to maintain current levels of gross margin and selling , general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues if the selling prices of our products do not increase with these increased costs. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the net change?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the balance in the air value of our foreign currency forward contracts in 2009?
[Turn 2] what about in 2008?
[Turn 3] what is the net change?

Pre-table text:
addition , we are exposed to gains and losses resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on transactions generated by our international subsidiaries in currencies other than their local currencies .
these gains and losses are primarily driven by inter-company transactions .
these exposures are included in other income ( expense ) , net on the consolidated statements of income .
since 2007 , we have used foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk from exchange rate fluctuations on inter-company transactions and projected inventory purchases for our canadian subsidiary .
beginning in december 2008 , we began using foreign currency forward contracts in order to reduce the risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on inter-company transactions for our european subsidiary .
we do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes .
based on the foreign currency forward contracts outstanding as of december 31 , 2009 , we receive us dollars in exchange for canadian dollars at a weighted average contractual forward foreign currency exchange rate of 1.04 cad per $ 1.00 and us dollars in exchange for euros at a weighted average contractual foreign currency exchange rate of 0.70 eur per $ 1.00 .
as of december 31 , 2009 , the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our canadian subsidiary was $ 15.4 million with contract maturities of 1 month , and the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our european subsidiary was $ 56.0 million with contract maturities of 1 month .
the foreign currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow hedges , and accordingly , changes in their fair value are recorded in other income ( expense ) , net on the consolidated statements of income .
the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts was $ 0.3 million and $ 1.2 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
these amounts are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet .
refer to note 9 for a discussion of the fair value measurements .
other income ( expense ) , net included the following amounts related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and derivative foreign currency forward contracts: .

Table:
year ended december 31 , ( in thousands )	year ended december 31 , 2009	year ended december 31 , 2008	2007
unrealized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses )	$ 5222	$ -5459 ( 5459 )	$ 2567
realized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses )	-261 ( 261 )	-2166 ( 2166 )	174
unrealized derivative gains ( losses )	-1060 ( 1060 )	1650	-243 ( 243 )
realized derivative losses	-4412 ( 4412 )	-204 ( 204 )	-469 ( 469 )

Post-table text:
although we have entered into foreign currency forward contracts to minimize some of the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on future cash flows , we cannot be assured that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations .
inflation inflationary factors such as increases in the cost of our product and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results .
although we do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations to date , a high rate of inflation in the future may have an adverse effect on our ability to maintain current levels of gross margin and selling , general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues if the selling prices of our products do not increase with these increased costs. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what percentage change does this represent?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the balance in the air value of our foreign currency forward contracts in 2009?
[Turn 2] what about in 2008?
[Turn 3] what is the net change?
[Turn 4] what percentage change does this represent?

Pre-table text:
addition , we are exposed to gains and losses resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on transactions generated by our international subsidiaries in currencies other than their local currencies .
these gains and losses are primarily driven by inter-company transactions .
these exposures are included in other income ( expense ) , net on the consolidated statements of income .
since 2007 , we have used foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk from exchange rate fluctuations on inter-company transactions and projected inventory purchases for our canadian subsidiary .
beginning in december 2008 , we began using foreign currency forward contracts in order to reduce the risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on inter-company transactions for our european subsidiary .
we do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes .
based on the foreign currency forward contracts outstanding as of december 31 , 2009 , we receive us dollars in exchange for canadian dollars at a weighted average contractual forward foreign currency exchange rate of 1.04 cad per $ 1.00 and us dollars in exchange for euros at a weighted average contractual foreign currency exchange rate of 0.70 eur per $ 1.00 .
as of december 31 , 2009 , the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our canadian subsidiary was $ 15.4 million with contract maturities of 1 month , and the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our european subsidiary was $ 56.0 million with contract maturities of 1 month .
the foreign currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow hedges , and accordingly , changes in their fair value are recorded in other income ( expense ) , net on the consolidated statements of income .
the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts was $ 0.3 million and $ 1.2 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
these amounts are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet .
refer to note 9 for a discussion of the fair value measurements .
other income ( expense ) , net included the following amounts related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and derivative foreign currency forward contracts: .

Table:
year ended december 31 , ( in thousands )	year ended december 31 , 2009	year ended december 31 , 2008	2007
unrealized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses )	$ 5222	$ -5459 ( 5459 )	$ 2567
realized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses )	-261 ( 261 )	-2166 ( 2166 )	174
unrealized derivative gains ( losses )	-1060 ( 1060 )	1650	-243 ( 243 )
realized derivative losses	-4412 ( 4412 )	-204 ( 204 )	-469 ( 469 )

Post-table text:
although we have entered into foreign currency forward contracts to minimize some of the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on future cash flows , we cannot be assured that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations .
inflation inflationary factors such as increases in the cost of our product and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results .
although we do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations to date , a high rate of inflation in the future may have an adverse effect on our ability to maintain current levels of gross margin and selling , general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues if the selling prices of our products do not increase with these increased costs. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the total operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year, in billions?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the total operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year, in billions?

Pre-table text:
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 .
in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments .
the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits .

Table:
( in millions )	pensionbenefits	otherbenefits
2007	$ 1440	$ 260
2008	1490	260
2009	1540	270
2010	1600	270
2011	1660	270
years 2012 2013 2016	9530	1260

Post-table text:
as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits .
the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million .
the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 .
we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans .
the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .
note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .
future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) .
certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s .
government under short-term or cancelable arrangements .
note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment .
we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole .
we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty .
these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio .
the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology .
we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation .
on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california .
we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program .
the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s .
air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 .
on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim .
our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals .
on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel .
natural resources defense council , et al v .
lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel .
john d .
tillson v .
lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al .
the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what about in millions?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the total operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year, in billions?
[Turn 2] what about in millions?

Pre-table text:
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 .
in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments .
the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits .

Table:
( in millions )	pensionbenefits	otherbenefits
2007	$ 1440	$ 260
2008	1490	260
2009	1540	270
2010	1600	270
2011	1660	270
years 2012 2013 2016	9530	1260

Post-table text:
as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits .
the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million .
the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 .
we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans .
the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .
note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .
future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) .
certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s .
government under short-term or cancelable arrangements .
note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment .
we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole .
we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty .
these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio .
the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology .
we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation .
on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california .
we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program .
the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s .
air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 .
on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim .
our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals .
on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel .
natural resources defense council , et al v .
lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel .
john d .
tillson v .
lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al .
the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what amount is due in 2007?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the total operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year, in billions?
[Turn 2] what about in millions?
[Turn 3] what amount is due in 2007?

Pre-table text:
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 .
in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments .
the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits .

Table:
( in millions )	pensionbenefits	otherbenefits
2007	$ 1440	$ 260
2008	1490	260
2009	1540	270
2010	1600	270
2011	1660	270
years 2012 2013 2016	9530	1260

Post-table text:
as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits .
the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million .
the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 .
we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans .
the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .
note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .
future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) .
certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s .
government under short-term or cancelable arrangements .
note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment .
we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole .
we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty .
these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio .
the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology .
we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation .
on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california .
we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program .
the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s .
air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 .
on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim .
our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals .
on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel .
natural resources defense council , et al v .
lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel .
john d .
tillson v .
lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al .
the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what proportion does this represent?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the total operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year, in billions?
[Turn 2] what about in millions?
[Turn 3] what amount is due in 2007?
[Turn 4] what proportion does this represent?

Pre-table text:
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 .
in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments .
the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits .

Table:
( in millions )	pensionbenefits	otherbenefits
2007	$ 1440	$ 260
2008	1490	260
2009	1540	270
2010	1600	270
2011	1660	270
years 2012 2013 2016	9530	1260

Post-table text:
as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits .
the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million .
the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 .
we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans .
the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .
note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .
future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) .
certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s .
government under short-term or cancelable arrangements .
note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment .
we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole .
we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty .
these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio .
the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology .
we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation .
on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california .
we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program .
the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s .
air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 .
on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim .
our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals .
on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel .
natural resources defense council , et al v .
lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel .
john d .
tillson v .
lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al .
the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the net change in revenue for risk solutions from 2010 to 2011?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the net change in revenue for risk solutions from 2010 to 2011?

Pre-table text:
aon has certain contractual contingent guarantees for premium payments owed by clients to certain insurance companies .
the maximum exposure with respect to such contractual contingent guarantees was approximately $ 48 million at december 31 , 2011 .
aon has provided commitments to fund certain limited partnerships in which it has an interest in the event that the general partners request funding .
some of these commitments have specific expiration dates and the maximum potential funding under these commitments was $ 64 million at december 31 , 2011 .
during 2011 , the company funded $ 15 million of these commitments .
aon expects that as prudent business interests dictate , additional guarantees and indemnifications may be issued from time to time .
17 .
related party transactions during 2011 , the company , in the ordinary course of business , provided retail brokerage , consulting and financial advisory services to , and received wholesale brokerage services from , an entity that is controlled by one of the company 2019s stockholders .
these transactions were negotiated at an arms-length basis and contain customary terms and conditions .
during 2011 , commissions and fee revenue from these transactions was approximately $ 9 million .
18 .
segment information the company has two reportable operating segments : risk solutions and hr solutions .
unallocated income and expenses , when combined with the operating segments and after the elimination of intersegment revenues and expenses , total to the amounts in the consolidated financial statements .
reportable operating segments have been determined using a management approach , which is consistent with the basis and manner in which aon 2019s chief operating decision maker ( 2018 2018codm 2019 2019 ) uses financial information for the purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance .
the codm assesses performance based on operating segment operating income and generally accounts for intersegment revenue as if the revenue were from third parties and at what management believes are current market prices .
the company does not present net assets by segment as this information is not reviewed by the codm .
risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through aon 2019s global distribution network .
hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies .
aon 2019s total revenue is as follows ( in millions ) : .

Table:
years ended december 31	2011	2010	2009
risk solutions	$ 6817	$ 6423	$ 6305
hr solutions	4501	2111	1267
intersegment elimination	-31 ( 31 )	-22 ( 22 )	-26 ( 26 )
total operating segments	11287	8512	7546
unallocated	2014	2014	49
total revenue	$ 11287	$ 8512	$ 7595

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the total revenue from risk solutions in 2010?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the net change in revenue for risk solutions from 2010 to 2011?
[Turn 2] what is the total revenue from risk solutions in 2010?

Pre-table text:
aon has certain contractual contingent guarantees for premium payments owed by clients to certain insurance companies .
the maximum exposure with respect to such contractual contingent guarantees was approximately $ 48 million at december 31 , 2011 .
aon has provided commitments to fund certain limited partnerships in which it has an interest in the event that the general partners request funding .
some of these commitments have specific expiration dates and the maximum potential funding under these commitments was $ 64 million at december 31 , 2011 .
during 2011 , the company funded $ 15 million of these commitments .
aon expects that as prudent business interests dictate , additional guarantees and indemnifications may be issued from time to time .
17 .
related party transactions during 2011 , the company , in the ordinary course of business , provided retail brokerage , consulting and financial advisory services to , and received wholesale brokerage services from , an entity that is controlled by one of the company 2019s stockholders .
these transactions were negotiated at an arms-length basis and contain customary terms and conditions .
during 2011 , commissions and fee revenue from these transactions was approximately $ 9 million .
18 .
segment information the company has two reportable operating segments : risk solutions and hr solutions .
unallocated income and expenses , when combined with the operating segments and after the elimination of intersegment revenues and expenses , total to the amounts in the consolidated financial statements .
reportable operating segments have been determined using a management approach , which is consistent with the basis and manner in which aon 2019s chief operating decision maker ( 2018 2018codm 2019 2019 ) uses financial information for the purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance .
the codm assesses performance based on operating segment operating income and generally accounts for intersegment revenue as if the revenue were from third parties and at what management believes are current market prices .
the company does not present net assets by segment as this information is not reviewed by the codm .
risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through aon 2019s global distribution network .
hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies .
aon 2019s total revenue is as follows ( in millions ) : .

Table:
years ended december 31	2011	2010	2009
risk solutions	$ 6817	$ 6423	$ 6305
hr solutions	4501	2111	1267
intersegment elimination	-31 ( 31 )	-22 ( 22 )	-26 ( 26 )
total operating segments	11287	8512	7546
unallocated	2014	2014	49
total revenue	$ 11287	$ 8512	$ 7595

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what percentage increase does this represent?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the net change in revenue for risk solutions from 2010 to 2011?
[Turn 2] what is the total revenue from risk solutions in 2010?
[Turn 3] what percentage increase does this represent?

Pre-table text:
aon has certain contractual contingent guarantees for premium payments owed by clients to certain insurance companies .
the maximum exposure with respect to such contractual contingent guarantees was approximately $ 48 million at december 31 , 2011 .
aon has provided commitments to fund certain limited partnerships in which it has an interest in the event that the general partners request funding .
some of these commitments have specific expiration dates and the maximum potential funding under these commitments was $ 64 million at december 31 , 2011 .
during 2011 , the company funded $ 15 million of these commitments .
aon expects that as prudent business interests dictate , additional guarantees and indemnifications may be issued from time to time .
17 .
related party transactions during 2011 , the company , in the ordinary course of business , provided retail brokerage , consulting and financial advisory services to , and received wholesale brokerage services from , an entity that is controlled by one of the company 2019s stockholders .
these transactions were negotiated at an arms-length basis and contain customary terms and conditions .
during 2011 , commissions and fee revenue from these transactions was approximately $ 9 million .
18 .
segment information the company has two reportable operating segments : risk solutions and hr solutions .
unallocated income and expenses , when combined with the operating segments and after the elimination of intersegment revenues and expenses , total to the amounts in the consolidated financial statements .
reportable operating segments have been determined using a management approach , which is consistent with the basis and manner in which aon 2019s chief operating decision maker ( 2018 2018codm 2019 2019 ) uses financial information for the purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance .
the codm assesses performance based on operating segment operating income and generally accounts for intersegment revenue as if the revenue were from third parties and at what management believes are current market prices .
the company does not present net assets by segment as this information is not reviewed by the codm .
risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through aon 2019s global distribution network .
hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies .
aon 2019s total revenue is as follows ( in millions ) : .

Table:
years ended december 31	2011	2010	2009
risk solutions	$ 6817	$ 6423	$ 6305
hr solutions	4501	2111	1267
intersegment elimination	-31 ( 31 )	-22 ( 22 )	-26 ( 26 )
total operating segments	11287	8512	7546
unallocated	2014	2014	49
total revenue	$ 11287	$ 8512	$ 7595

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
how much did the weighted average exercise price per share increase between 2005 and 2007?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] how much did the weighted average exercise price per share increase between 2005 and 2007?

Pre-table text:
stock-based awards under the plan stock options 2013 marathon grants stock options under the 2007 plan and previously granted options under the 2003 plan .
marathon 2019s stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant .
through 2004 , certain stock options were granted under the 2003 plan with a tandem stock appreciation right , which allows the recipient to instead elect to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock , as determined in accordance with the 2003 plan , over the option price of the shares .
in general , stock options granted under the 2007 plan and the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .
stock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted sars under the 2003 plan .
no stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan .
similar to stock options , stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price .
under the 2003 plan , certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options .
in general , sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .
stock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan .
no stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan .
beginning in 2005 , marathon discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grants cash-settled performance units to officers .
all stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited .
as a result , there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards .
restricted stock 2013 marathon grants restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan .
in 2005 , the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package .
the restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .
marathon also grants restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees ( 201crestricted stock awards 201d ) , based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes .
the restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .
prior to vesting , all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon .
the non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by marathon 2019s transfer agent .
common stock units 2013 marathon maintains an equity compensation program for its non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan .
all non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units , and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors .
when dividends are paid on marathon common stock , directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units .
stock-based compensation expense 2013 total employee stock-based compensation expense was $ 80 million , $ 83 million and $ 111 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .
the total related income tax benefits were $ 29 million , $ 31 million and $ 39 million .
in 2007 and 2006 , cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $ 27 million and $ 50 million .
tax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $ 30 million and $ 36 million .
cash settlements of stock option awards totaled $ 1 million and $ 3 million in 2007 and 2006 .
stock option awards granted 2013 during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , marathon granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees .
the weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions: .

Table:
	2007	2006	2005
weighted average exercise price per share	$ 60.94	$ 37.84	$ 25.14
expected annual dividends per share	$ 0.96	$ 0.80	$ 0.66
expected life in years	5.0	5.1	5.5
expected volatility	27% ( 27 % )	28% ( 28 % )	28% ( 28 % )
risk-free interest rate	4.1% ( 4.1 % )	5.0% ( 5.0 % )	3.8% ( 3.8 % )
weighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted	$ 17.24	$ 10.19	$ 6.15

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
so what was the percentage change during this time?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] how much did the weighted average exercise price per share increase between 2005 and 2007?
[Turn 2] so what was the percentage change during this time?

Pre-table text:
stock-based awards under the plan stock options 2013 marathon grants stock options under the 2007 plan and previously granted options under the 2003 plan .
marathon 2019s stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant .
through 2004 , certain stock options were granted under the 2003 plan with a tandem stock appreciation right , which allows the recipient to instead elect to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock , as determined in accordance with the 2003 plan , over the option price of the shares .
in general , stock options granted under the 2007 plan and the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .
stock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted sars under the 2003 plan .
no stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan .
similar to stock options , stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price .
under the 2003 plan , certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options .
in general , sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .
stock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan .
no stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan .
beginning in 2005 , marathon discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grants cash-settled performance units to officers .
all stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited .
as a result , there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards .
restricted stock 2013 marathon grants restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan .
in 2005 , the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package .
the restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .
marathon also grants restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees ( 201crestricted stock awards 201d ) , based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes .
the restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .
prior to vesting , all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon .
the non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by marathon 2019s transfer agent .
common stock units 2013 marathon maintains an equity compensation program for its non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan .
all non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units , and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors .
when dividends are paid on marathon common stock , directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units .
stock-based compensation expense 2013 total employee stock-based compensation expense was $ 80 million , $ 83 million and $ 111 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .
the total related income tax benefits were $ 29 million , $ 31 million and $ 39 million .
in 2007 and 2006 , cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $ 27 million and $ 50 million .
tax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $ 30 million and $ 36 million .
cash settlements of stock option awards totaled $ 1 million and $ 3 million in 2007 and 2006 .
stock option awards granted 2013 during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , marathon granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees .
the weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions: .

Table:
	2007	2006	2005
weighted average exercise price per share	$ 60.94	$ 37.84	$ 25.14
expected annual dividends per share	$ 0.96	$ 0.80	$ 0.66
expected life in years	5.0	5.1	5.5
expected volatility	27% ( 27 % )	28% ( 28 % )	28% ( 28 % )
risk-free interest rate	4.1% ( 4.1 % )	5.0% ( 5.0 % )	3.8% ( 3.8 % )
weighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted	$ 17.24	$ 10.19	$ 6.15

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what were the total tax benefits for deductions in 2007 and 2006 in excess of the stock-based compensation expense for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] how much did the weighted average exercise price per share increase between 2005 and 2007?
[Turn 2] so what was the percentage change during this time?
[Turn 3] what were the total tax benefits for deductions in 2007 and 2006 in excess of the stock-based compensation expense for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested?

Pre-table text:
stock-based awards under the plan stock options 2013 marathon grants stock options under the 2007 plan and previously granted options under the 2003 plan .
marathon 2019s stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant .
through 2004 , certain stock options were granted under the 2003 plan with a tandem stock appreciation right , which allows the recipient to instead elect to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock , as determined in accordance with the 2003 plan , over the option price of the shares .
in general , stock options granted under the 2007 plan and the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .
stock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted sars under the 2003 plan .
no stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan .
similar to stock options , stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price .
under the 2003 plan , certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options .
in general , sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .
stock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan .
no stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan .
beginning in 2005 , marathon discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grants cash-settled performance units to officers .
all stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited .
as a result , there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards .
restricted stock 2013 marathon grants restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan .
in 2005 , the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package .
the restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .
marathon also grants restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees ( 201crestricted stock awards 201d ) , based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes .
the restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .
prior to vesting , all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon .
the non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by marathon 2019s transfer agent .
common stock units 2013 marathon maintains an equity compensation program for its non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan .
all non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units , and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors .
when dividends are paid on marathon common stock , directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units .
stock-based compensation expense 2013 total employee stock-based compensation expense was $ 80 million , $ 83 million and $ 111 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .
the total related income tax benefits were $ 29 million , $ 31 million and $ 39 million .
in 2007 and 2006 , cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $ 27 million and $ 50 million .
tax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $ 30 million and $ 36 million .
cash settlements of stock option awards totaled $ 1 million and $ 3 million in 2007 and 2006 .
stock option awards granted 2013 during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , marathon granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees .
the weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions: .

Table:
	2007	2006	2005
weighted average exercise price per share	$ 60.94	$ 37.84	$ 25.14
expected annual dividends per share	$ 0.96	$ 0.80	$ 0.66
expected life in years	5.0	5.1	5.5
expected volatility	27% ( 27 % )	28% ( 28 % )	28% ( 28 % )
risk-free interest rate	4.1% ( 4.1 % )	5.0% ( 5.0 % )	3.8% ( 3.8 % )
weighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted	$ 17.24	$ 10.19	$ 6.15

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the net change in value of total net goodwill from 2010 to 2011?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net change in value of total net goodwill from 2010 to 2011?

Pre-table text:
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) h .
goodwill and other intangible assets ( continued ) goodwill at december 31 , accumulated impairment losses goodwill at december 31 , 2010 additions ( a ) discontinued operations ( b ) pre-tax impairment charge other ( c ) goodwill at december 31 , cabinets and related products .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 587 $ ( 364 ) $ 223 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ ( 44 ) $ 2 $ 181 .

Table:
	gross goodwill at december 31 2010	accumulated impairment losses	net goodwill at december 31 2010	additions ( a )	discontinued operations ( b )	pre-tax impairment charge	other ( c )	net goodwill at december 31 2011
cabinets and related products	$ 587	$ -364 ( 364 )	$ 223	$ 2014	$ 2014	$ -44 ( 44 )	$ 2	$ 181
plumbing products	536	-340 ( 340 )	196	9	2014	2014	-4 ( 4 )	201
installation and other services	1819	-762 ( 762 )	1057	2014	-13 ( 13 )	2014	2014	1044
decorative architectural products	294	2014	294	2014	2014	-75 ( 75 )	2014	219
other specialty products	980	-367 ( 367 )	613	2014	2014	-367 ( 367 )	2014	246
total	$ 4216	$ -1833 ( 1833 )	$ 2383	$ 9	$ -13 ( 13 )	$ -486 ( 486 )	$ -2 ( 2 )	$ 1891

Post-table text:
( a ) additions include acquisitions .
( b ) during 2011 , the company reclassified the goodwill related to the business units held for sale .
subsequent to the reclassification , the company recognized a charge for those business units expected to be divested at a loss ; the charge included a write-down of goodwill of $ 13 million .
( c ) other principally includes the effect of foreign currency translation and purchase price adjustments related to prior-year acquisitions .
in the fourth quarters of 2012 and 2011 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets .
the impairment test in 2012 indicated there was no impairment of goodwill for any of the company 2019s reporting units .
the impairment test in 2011 indicated that goodwill recorded for certain of the company 2019s reporting units was impaired .
the company recognized the non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges , in continuing operations , for goodwill of $ 486 million ( $ 330 million , after tax ) for 2011 .
in 2011 , the pre-tax impairment charge in the cabinets and related products segment relates to the european ready-to- assemble cabinet manufacturer and reflects the declining demand for certain products , as well as decreased operating margins .
the pre-tax impairment charge in the decorative architectural products segment relates to the builders 2019 hardware business and reflects increasing competitive conditions for that business .
the pre-tax impairment charge in the other specialty products segment relates to the north american window and door business and reflects the continuing weak level of new home construction activity in the western u.s. , the reduced levels of repair and remodel activity and the expectation that recovery in these segments will be modestly slower than anticipated .
the company then assessed the long-lived assets associated with these business units and determined no impairment was necessary at december 31 , 2011 .
other indefinite-lived intangible assets were $ 132 million and $ 174 million at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and principally included registered trademarks .
in 2012 and 2011 , the impairment test indicated that the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the other specialty products segment and the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the plumbing products segment ( 2011 only ) were impaired due to changes in the long-term outlook for the business units .
the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite- lived intangible assets of $ 42 million ( $ 27 million , after tax ) and $ 8 million ( $ 5 million , after tax ) in 2012 and 2011 , respectively .
in 2010 , the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite-lived intangible assets of $ 10 million ( $ 6 million after tax ) related to the installation and other services segment ( $ 9 million pre-tax ) and the plumbing products segment ( $ 1 million pre-tax ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the 2010 value?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net change in value of total net goodwill from 2010 to 2011?
[Turn 2] what was the 2010 value?

Pre-table text:
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) h .
goodwill and other intangible assets ( continued ) goodwill at december 31 , accumulated impairment losses goodwill at december 31 , 2010 additions ( a ) discontinued operations ( b ) pre-tax impairment charge other ( c ) goodwill at december 31 , cabinets and related products .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 587 $ ( 364 ) $ 223 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ ( 44 ) $ 2 $ 181 .

Table:
	gross goodwill at december 31 2010	accumulated impairment losses	net goodwill at december 31 2010	additions ( a )	discontinued operations ( b )	pre-tax impairment charge	other ( c )	net goodwill at december 31 2011
cabinets and related products	$ 587	$ -364 ( 364 )	$ 223	$ 2014	$ 2014	$ -44 ( 44 )	$ 2	$ 181
plumbing products	536	-340 ( 340 )	196	9	2014	2014	-4 ( 4 )	201
installation and other services	1819	-762 ( 762 )	1057	2014	-13 ( 13 )	2014	2014	1044
decorative architectural products	294	2014	294	2014	2014	-75 ( 75 )	2014	219
other specialty products	980	-367 ( 367 )	613	2014	2014	-367 ( 367 )	2014	246
total	$ 4216	$ -1833 ( 1833 )	$ 2383	$ 9	$ -13 ( 13 )	$ -486 ( 486 )	$ -2 ( 2 )	$ 1891

Post-table text:
( a ) additions include acquisitions .
( b ) during 2011 , the company reclassified the goodwill related to the business units held for sale .
subsequent to the reclassification , the company recognized a charge for those business units expected to be divested at a loss ; the charge included a write-down of goodwill of $ 13 million .
( c ) other principally includes the effect of foreign currency translation and purchase price adjustments related to prior-year acquisitions .
in the fourth quarters of 2012 and 2011 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets .
the impairment test in 2012 indicated there was no impairment of goodwill for any of the company 2019s reporting units .
the impairment test in 2011 indicated that goodwill recorded for certain of the company 2019s reporting units was impaired .
the company recognized the non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges , in continuing operations , for goodwill of $ 486 million ( $ 330 million , after tax ) for 2011 .
in 2011 , the pre-tax impairment charge in the cabinets and related products segment relates to the european ready-to- assemble cabinet manufacturer and reflects the declining demand for certain products , as well as decreased operating margins .
the pre-tax impairment charge in the decorative architectural products segment relates to the builders 2019 hardware business and reflects increasing competitive conditions for that business .
the pre-tax impairment charge in the other specialty products segment relates to the north american window and door business and reflects the continuing weak level of new home construction activity in the western u.s. , the reduced levels of repair and remodel activity and the expectation that recovery in these segments will be modestly slower than anticipated .
the company then assessed the long-lived assets associated with these business units and determined no impairment was necessary at december 31 , 2011 .
other indefinite-lived intangible assets were $ 132 million and $ 174 million at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and principally included registered trademarks .
in 2012 and 2011 , the impairment test indicated that the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the other specialty products segment and the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the plumbing products segment ( 2011 only ) were impaired due to changes in the long-term outlook for the business units .
the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite- lived intangible assets of $ 42 million ( $ 27 million , after tax ) and $ 8 million ( $ 5 million , after tax ) in 2012 and 2011 , respectively .
in 2010 , the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite-lived intangible assets of $ 10 million ( $ 6 million after tax ) related to the installation and other services segment ( $ 9 million pre-tax ) and the plumbing products segment ( $ 1 million pre-tax ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the net change divide by the 2010 value?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the net change in value of total net goodwill from 2010 to 2011?
[Turn 2] what was the 2010 value?
[Turn 3] what is the net change divide by the 2010 value?

Pre-table text:
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) h .
goodwill and other intangible assets ( continued ) goodwill at december 31 , accumulated impairment losses goodwill at december 31 , 2010 additions ( a ) discontinued operations ( b ) pre-tax impairment charge other ( c ) goodwill at december 31 , cabinets and related products .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 587 $ ( 364 ) $ 223 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ ( 44 ) $ 2 $ 181 .

Table:
	gross goodwill at december 31 2010	accumulated impairment losses	net goodwill at december 31 2010	additions ( a )	discontinued operations ( b )	pre-tax impairment charge	other ( c )	net goodwill at december 31 2011
cabinets and related products	$ 587	$ -364 ( 364 )	$ 223	$ 2014	$ 2014	$ -44 ( 44 )	$ 2	$ 181
plumbing products	536	-340 ( 340 )	196	9	2014	2014	-4 ( 4 )	201
installation and other services	1819	-762 ( 762 )	1057	2014	-13 ( 13 )	2014	2014	1044
decorative architectural products	294	2014	294	2014	2014	-75 ( 75 )	2014	219
other specialty products	980	-367 ( 367 )	613	2014	2014	-367 ( 367 )	2014	246
total	$ 4216	$ -1833 ( 1833 )	$ 2383	$ 9	$ -13 ( 13 )	$ -486 ( 486 )	$ -2 ( 2 )	$ 1891

Post-table text:
( a ) additions include acquisitions .
( b ) during 2011 , the company reclassified the goodwill related to the business units held for sale .
subsequent to the reclassification , the company recognized a charge for those business units expected to be divested at a loss ; the charge included a write-down of goodwill of $ 13 million .
( c ) other principally includes the effect of foreign currency translation and purchase price adjustments related to prior-year acquisitions .
in the fourth quarters of 2012 and 2011 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets .
the impairment test in 2012 indicated there was no impairment of goodwill for any of the company 2019s reporting units .
the impairment test in 2011 indicated that goodwill recorded for certain of the company 2019s reporting units was impaired .
the company recognized the non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges , in continuing operations , for goodwill of $ 486 million ( $ 330 million , after tax ) for 2011 .
in 2011 , the pre-tax impairment charge in the cabinets and related products segment relates to the european ready-to- assemble cabinet manufacturer and reflects the declining demand for certain products , as well as decreased operating margins .
the pre-tax impairment charge in the decorative architectural products segment relates to the builders 2019 hardware business and reflects increasing competitive conditions for that business .
the pre-tax impairment charge in the other specialty products segment relates to the north american window and door business and reflects the continuing weak level of new home construction activity in the western u.s. , the reduced levels of repair and remodel activity and the expectation that recovery in these segments will be modestly slower than anticipated .
the company then assessed the long-lived assets associated with these business units and determined no impairment was necessary at december 31 , 2011 .
other indefinite-lived intangible assets were $ 132 million and $ 174 million at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and principally included registered trademarks .
in 2012 and 2011 , the impairment test indicated that the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the other specialty products segment and the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the plumbing products segment ( 2011 only ) were impaired due to changes in the long-term outlook for the business units .
the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite- lived intangible assets of $ 42 million ( $ 27 million , after tax ) and $ 8 million ( $ 5 million , after tax ) in 2012 and 2011 , respectively .
in 2010 , the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite-lived intangible assets of $ 10 million ( $ 6 million after tax ) related to the installation and other services segment ( $ 9 million pre-tax ) and the plumbing products segment ( $ 1 million pre-tax ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the total of inventories in 2003?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of inventories in 2003?

Pre-table text:
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .
a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .
an impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .
federal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .
operating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .
period and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .
the unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .
respective years or of future results .
the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .
periods benefited , typically five years .
for approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .
the company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .
share .
the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .
new capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .
the pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .
( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .
each the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .
receive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .
inventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .
the net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .

Table:
	2003	2002
finished goods	$ 384.3	$ 206.7
raw materials and work in progress	90.8	50.9
inventory step-up	52.6	2013
inventories net	$ 527.7	$ 257.6

Post-table text:
made by zimmer to implex pursuant to their existing alliance raw materials and work in progress 90.8 50.9 arrangement , escrow and other items .
the acquisition will be inventory step-up 52.6 2013 accounted for under the purchase method of accounting .
inventories , net $ 527.7 $ 257.6 reserves for obsolete and slow-moving inventory at4 .
change in accounting principle december 31 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 47.4 million and instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic $ 45.5 million , respectively .
provisions charged to expense surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical were $ 11.6 million , $ 6.0 million and $ 11.9 million for the procedures .
effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .
recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , amounts written off against the reserve were $ 11.7 million , plant and equipment .
undeployed instruments are carried at $ 7.1 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .
instruments in the december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .
field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .
following the acquisition of centerpulse , the company depreciation is computed using the straight-line method established a common approach for estimating excess based on average estimated useful lives , determined inventory and instruments .
this change in estimate resulted principally in reference to associated product life cycles , in a charge to earnings of $ 3.0 million after tax in the fourth primarily five years .
in accordance with sfas no .
144 , the quarter .
company reviews instruments for impairment whenever .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was it in 2002?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of inventories in 2003?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2002?

Pre-table text:
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .
a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .
an impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .
federal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .
operating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .
period and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .
the unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .
respective years or of future results .
the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .
periods benefited , typically five years .
for approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .
the company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .
share .
the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .
new capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .
the pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .
( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .
each the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .
receive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .
inventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .
the net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .

Table:
	2003	2002
finished goods	$ 384.3	$ 206.7
raw materials and work in progress	90.8	50.9
inventory step-up	52.6	2013
inventories net	$ 527.7	$ 257.6

Post-table text:
made by zimmer to implex pursuant to their existing alliance raw materials and work in progress 90.8 50.9 arrangement , escrow and other items .
the acquisition will be inventory step-up 52.6 2013 accounted for under the purchase method of accounting .
inventories , net $ 527.7 $ 257.6 reserves for obsolete and slow-moving inventory at4 .
change in accounting principle december 31 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 47.4 million and instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic $ 45.5 million , respectively .
provisions charged to expense surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical were $ 11.6 million , $ 6.0 million and $ 11.9 million for the procedures .
effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .
recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , amounts written off against the reserve were $ 11.7 million , plant and equipment .
undeployed instruments are carried at $ 7.1 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .
instruments in the december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .
field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .
following the acquisition of centerpulse , the company depreciation is computed using the straight-line method established a common approach for estimating excess based on average estimated useful lives , determined inventory and instruments .
this change in estimate resulted principally in reference to associated product life cycles , in a charge to earnings of $ 3.0 million after tax in the fourth primarily five years .
in accordance with sfas no .
144 , the quarter .
company reviews instruments for impairment whenever .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.