[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the current ratio of robert mondavi?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the current ratio of robert mondavi?

Pre-table text:
c o n s t e l l a t i o n b r a n d s , i n c .
baroness philippine de rothschild announced an agree- ment to maintain equal ownership of opus one .
opus one produces fine wines at its napa valley winery .
the acquisition of robert mondavi supports the com- pany 2019s strategy of strengthening the breadth of its portfolio across price segments to capitalize on the overall growth in the premium , super-premium and fine wine categories .
the company believes that the acquired robert mondavi brand names have strong brand recognition globally .
the vast majority of sales from these brands are generated in the united states .
the company is leveraging the robert mondavi brands in the united states through its selling , marketing and distribution infrastructure .
the company also intends to further expand distribution for the robert mondavi brands in europe through its constellation europe infrastructure .
the robert mondavi acquisition supports the com- pany 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories and geographies , and strengthens its competitive position in its core markets .
the robert mondavi acquisition provides the company with a greater presence in the growing premium , super-premium and fine wine sectors within the united states and the ability to capitalize on the broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets .
in particular , the company believes there are growth opportunities for premium , super-premium and fine wines in the united kingdom and other 201cnew world 201d wine markets .
total con- sideration paid in cash to the robert mondavi shareholders was $ 1030.7 million .
additionally , the company incurred direct acquisition costs of $ 12.0 million .
the purchase price was financed with borrowings under the company 2019s 2004 credit agreement ( as defined in note 9 ) .
in accordance with the purchase method of accounting , the acquired net assets are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition .
the purchase price was based primarily on the estimated future operating results of the robert mondavi business , including the factors described above , as well as an estimated benefit from operating cost synergies .
the results of operations of the robert mondavi busi- ness are reported in the constellation wines segment and have been included in the consolidated statements of income since the acquisition date .
the following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the robert mondavi acquisition at the date of acquisition , as adjusted for the final appraisal : ( in thousands ) .

Table:
current assets	$ 513782
property plant and equipment	438140
other assets	124450
trademarks	138000
goodwill	634203
total assets acquired	1848575
current liabilities	310919
long-term liabilities	494995
total liabilities assumed	805914
net assets acquired	$ 1042661

Post-table text:
the trademarks are not subject to amortization .
none of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes .
following the robert mondavi acquisition , the company sold certain of the acquired vineyard properties and related assets , investments accounted for under the equity method , and other winery properties and related assets , during the years ended february 28 , 2006 , and february 28 , 2005 .
the company realized net proceeds of $ 170.8 million from the sale of these assets during the year ended february 28 , 2006 .
amounts realized during the year ended february 28 , 2005 , were not material .
no gain or loss has been recognized upon the sale of these assets .
hardy acquisition 2013 on march 27 , 2003 , the company acquired control of brl hardy limited , now known as hardy wine company limited ( 201chardy 201d ) , and on april 9 , 2003 , the company completed its acquisition of all of hardy 2019s outstanding capital stock .
as a result of the acquisi- tion of hardy , the company also acquired the remaining 50% ( 50 % ) ownership of pacific wine partners llc ( 201cpwp 201d ) , the joint venture the company established with hardy in july 2001 .
the acquisition of hardy along with the remaining interest in pwp is referred to together as the 201chardy acquisition . 201d through this acquisition , the company acquired one of australia 2019s largest wine producers with interests in wineries and vineyards in most of australia 2019s major wine regions as well as new zealand and the united states and hardy 2019s marketing and sales operations in the united kingdom .
in october 2005 , pwp was merged into another subsidiary of the company .
total consideration paid in cash and class a common stock to the hardy shareholders was $ 1137.4 million .
additionally , the company recorded direct acquisition costs of $ 17.2 million .
the acquisition date for accounting pur- poses is march 27 , 2003 .
the company has recorded a $ 1.6 million reduction in the purchase price to reflect imputed interest between the accounting acquisition date and the final payment of consideration .
this charge is included as interest expense in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended february 29 , 2004 .
the cash portion of the purchase price paid to the hardy shareholders and optionholders ( $ 1060.2 million ) was financed with $ 660.2 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing credit agreement and $ 400.0 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing bridge loan agreement .
addi- tionally , the company issued 6577826 shares of the com- pany 2019s class a common stock , which were valued at $ 77.2 million based on the simple average of the closing market price of the company 2019s class a common stock beginning two days before and ending two days after april 4 , 2003 , the day the hardy shareholders elected the form of consid- eration they wished to receive .
the purchase price was based primarily on a discounted cash flow analysis that contemplated , among other things , the value of a broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets and a presence in the important australian winemaking regions .
the company and hardy have complementary businesses that share a common growth orientation and operating philosophy .
the hardy acquisition supports the company 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what were the remaining mondovi net assets acquired following the sale of certain excess assets from the deal?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the current ratio of robert mondavi?
[Turn 2] what were the remaining mondovi net assets acquired following the sale of certain excess assets from the deal?

Pre-table text:
c o n s t e l l a t i o n b r a n d s , i n c .
baroness philippine de rothschild announced an agree- ment to maintain equal ownership of opus one .
opus one produces fine wines at its napa valley winery .
the acquisition of robert mondavi supports the com- pany 2019s strategy of strengthening the breadth of its portfolio across price segments to capitalize on the overall growth in the premium , super-premium and fine wine categories .
the company believes that the acquired robert mondavi brand names have strong brand recognition globally .
the vast majority of sales from these brands are generated in the united states .
the company is leveraging the robert mondavi brands in the united states through its selling , marketing and distribution infrastructure .
the company also intends to further expand distribution for the robert mondavi brands in europe through its constellation europe infrastructure .
the robert mondavi acquisition supports the com- pany 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories and geographies , and strengthens its competitive position in its core markets .
the robert mondavi acquisition provides the company with a greater presence in the growing premium , super-premium and fine wine sectors within the united states and the ability to capitalize on the broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets .
in particular , the company believes there are growth opportunities for premium , super-premium and fine wines in the united kingdom and other 201cnew world 201d wine markets .
total con- sideration paid in cash to the robert mondavi shareholders was $ 1030.7 million .
additionally , the company incurred direct acquisition costs of $ 12.0 million .
the purchase price was financed with borrowings under the company 2019s 2004 credit agreement ( as defined in note 9 ) .
in accordance with the purchase method of accounting , the acquired net assets are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition .
the purchase price was based primarily on the estimated future operating results of the robert mondavi business , including the factors described above , as well as an estimated benefit from operating cost synergies .
the results of operations of the robert mondavi busi- ness are reported in the constellation wines segment and have been included in the consolidated statements of income since the acquisition date .
the following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the robert mondavi acquisition at the date of acquisition , as adjusted for the final appraisal : ( in thousands ) .

Table:
current assets	$ 513782
property plant and equipment	438140
other assets	124450
trademarks	138000
goodwill	634203
total assets acquired	1848575
current liabilities	310919
long-term liabilities	494995
total liabilities assumed	805914
net assets acquired	$ 1042661

Post-table text:
the trademarks are not subject to amortization .
none of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes .
following the robert mondavi acquisition , the company sold certain of the acquired vineyard properties and related assets , investments accounted for under the equity method , and other winery properties and related assets , during the years ended february 28 , 2006 , and february 28 , 2005 .
the company realized net proceeds of $ 170.8 million from the sale of these assets during the year ended february 28 , 2006 .
amounts realized during the year ended february 28 , 2005 , were not material .
no gain or loss has been recognized upon the sale of these assets .
hardy acquisition 2013 on march 27 , 2003 , the company acquired control of brl hardy limited , now known as hardy wine company limited ( 201chardy 201d ) , and on april 9 , 2003 , the company completed its acquisition of all of hardy 2019s outstanding capital stock .
as a result of the acquisi- tion of hardy , the company also acquired the remaining 50% ( 50 % ) ownership of pacific wine partners llc ( 201cpwp 201d ) , the joint venture the company established with hardy in july 2001 .
the acquisition of hardy along with the remaining interest in pwp is referred to together as the 201chardy acquisition . 201d through this acquisition , the company acquired one of australia 2019s largest wine producers with interests in wineries and vineyards in most of australia 2019s major wine regions as well as new zealand and the united states and hardy 2019s marketing and sales operations in the united kingdom .
in october 2005 , pwp was merged into another subsidiary of the company .
total consideration paid in cash and class a common stock to the hardy shareholders was $ 1137.4 million .
additionally , the company recorded direct acquisition costs of $ 17.2 million .
the acquisition date for accounting pur- poses is march 27 , 2003 .
the company has recorded a $ 1.6 million reduction in the purchase price to reflect imputed interest between the accounting acquisition date and the final payment of consideration .
this charge is included as interest expense in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended february 29 , 2004 .
the cash portion of the purchase price paid to the hardy shareholders and optionholders ( $ 1060.2 million ) was financed with $ 660.2 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing credit agreement and $ 400.0 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing bridge loan agreement .
addi- tionally , the company issued 6577826 shares of the com- pany 2019s class a common stock , which were valued at $ 77.2 million based on the simple average of the closing market price of the company 2019s class a common stock beginning two days before and ending two days after april 4 , 2003 , the day the hardy shareholders elected the form of consid- eration they wished to receive .
the purchase price was based primarily on a discounted cash flow analysis that contemplated , among other things , the value of a broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets and a presence in the important australian winemaking regions .
the company and hardy have complementary businesses that share a common growth orientation and operating philosophy .
the hardy acquisition supports the company 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the value of net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities in 2015?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities in 2015?

Pre-table text:
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .

Table:
cash flow data	years ended december 31 , 2015	years ended december 31 , 2014	years ended december 31 , 2013
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1	$ 848.2	$ 831.2	$ 598.4
net cash used in working capital2	-117.5 ( 117.5 )	-131.1 ( 131.1 )	-9.6 ( 9.6 )
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash	-56.7 ( 56.7 )	-30.6 ( 30.6 )	4.1
net cash provided by operating activities	$ 674.0	$ 669.5	$ 592.9
net cash used in investing activities	-202.8 ( 202.8 )	-200.8 ( 200.8 )	-224.5 ( 224.5 )
net cash used in financing activities	-472.8 ( 472.8 )	-343.9 ( 343.9 )	-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )

Post-table text:
1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .
2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .
due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .
our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .
net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .
our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .
the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .
in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .
to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .
the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .
our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .
for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .
investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .
net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .
capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .
we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the 2014 value?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities in 2015?
[Turn 2] what is the 2014 value?

Pre-table text:
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .

Table:
cash flow data	years ended december 31 , 2015	years ended december 31 , 2014	years ended december 31 , 2013
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1	$ 848.2	$ 831.2	$ 598.4
net cash used in working capital2	-117.5 ( 117.5 )	-131.1 ( 131.1 )	-9.6 ( 9.6 )
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash	-56.7 ( 56.7 )	-30.6 ( 30.6 )	4.1
net cash provided by operating activities	$ 674.0	$ 669.5	$ 592.9
net cash used in investing activities	-202.8 ( 202.8 )	-200.8 ( 200.8 )	-224.5 ( 224.5 )
net cash used in financing activities	-472.8 ( 472.8 )	-343.9 ( 343.9 )	-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )

Post-table text:
1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .
2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .
due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .
our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .
net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .
our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .
the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .
in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .
to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .
the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .
our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .
for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .
investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .
net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .
capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .
we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the net change?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities in 2015?
[Turn 2] what is the 2014 value?
[Turn 3] what is the net change?

Pre-table text:
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .

Table:
cash flow data	years ended december 31 , 2015	years ended december 31 , 2014	years ended december 31 , 2013
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1	$ 848.2	$ 831.2	$ 598.4
net cash used in working capital2	-117.5 ( 117.5 )	-131.1 ( 131.1 )	-9.6 ( 9.6 )
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash	-56.7 ( 56.7 )	-30.6 ( 30.6 )	4.1
net cash provided by operating activities	$ 674.0	$ 669.5	$ 592.9
net cash used in investing activities	-202.8 ( 202.8 )	-200.8 ( 200.8 )	-224.5 ( 224.5 )
net cash used in financing activities	-472.8 ( 472.8 )	-343.9 ( 343.9 )	-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )

Post-table text:
1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .
2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .
due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .
our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .
net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .
our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .
the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .
in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .
to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .
the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .
our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .
for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .
investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .
net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .
capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .
we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the net change over the 2014 value?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities in 2015?
[Turn 2] what is the 2014 value?
[Turn 3] what is the net change?
[Turn 4] what is the net change over the 2014 value?

Pre-table text:
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .

Table:
cash flow data	years ended december 31 , 2015	years ended december 31 , 2014	years ended december 31 , 2013
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1	$ 848.2	$ 831.2	$ 598.4
net cash used in working capital2	-117.5 ( 117.5 )	-131.1 ( 131.1 )	-9.6 ( 9.6 )
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash	-56.7 ( 56.7 )	-30.6 ( 30.6 )	4.1
net cash provided by operating activities	$ 674.0	$ 669.5	$ 592.9
net cash used in investing activities	-202.8 ( 202.8 )	-200.8 ( 200.8 )	-224.5 ( 224.5 )
net cash used in financing activities	-472.8 ( 472.8 )	-343.9 ( 343.9 )	-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )

Post-table text:
1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .
2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .
due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .
our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .
net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .
our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .
the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .
in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .
to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .
the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .
our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .
for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .
investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .
net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .
capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .
we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is that times 100?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the value of net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities in 2015?
[Turn 2] what is the 2014 value?
[Turn 3] what is the net change?
[Turn 4] what is the net change over the 2014 value?
[Turn 5] what is that times 100?

Pre-table text:
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .

Table:
cash flow data	years ended december 31 , 2015	years ended december 31 , 2014	years ended december 31 , 2013
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1	$ 848.2	$ 831.2	$ 598.4
net cash used in working capital2	-117.5 ( 117.5 )	-131.1 ( 131.1 )	-9.6 ( 9.6 )
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash	-56.7 ( 56.7 )	-30.6 ( 30.6 )	4.1
net cash provided by operating activities	$ 674.0	$ 669.5	$ 592.9
net cash used in investing activities	-202.8 ( 202.8 )	-200.8 ( 200.8 )	-224.5 ( 224.5 )
net cash used in financing activities	-472.8 ( 472.8 )	-343.9 ( 343.9 )	-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )

Post-table text:
1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .
2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .
due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .
our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .
net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .
our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .
the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .
in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .
to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .
the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .
our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .
for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .
investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .
net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .
capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .
we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the price of the s&p 500 index in 2015?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the price of the s&p 500 index in 2015?

Pre-table text:
item 5 .
market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

Table:
	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015
loews common stock	100.0	97.37	106.04	126.23	110.59	101.72
s&p 500 index	100.0	102.11	118.45	156.82	178.29	180.75
loews peer group ( a )	100.0	101.59	115.19	145.12	152.84	144.70

Post-table text:
( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r .
berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p .
( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd .
and the travelers companies , inc .
dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 .
regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the price in 2010?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the price of the s&p 500 index in 2015?
[Turn 2] what was the price in 2010?

Pre-table text:
item 5 .
market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

Table:
	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015
loews common stock	100.0	97.37	106.04	126.23	110.59	101.72
s&p 500 index	100.0	102.11	118.45	156.82	178.29	180.75
loews peer group ( a )	100.0	101.59	115.19	145.12	152.84	144.70

Post-table text:
( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r .
berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p .
( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd .
and the travelers companies , inc .
dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 .
regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the net change?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the price of the s&p 500 index in 2015?
[Turn 2] what was the price in 2010?
[Turn 3] what is the net change?

Pre-table text:
item 5 .
market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

Table:
	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015
loews common stock	100.0	97.37	106.04	126.23	110.59	101.72
s&p 500 index	100.0	102.11	118.45	156.82	178.29	180.75
loews peer group ( a )	100.0	101.59	115.19	145.12	152.84	144.70

Post-table text:
( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r .
berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p .
( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd .
and the travelers companies , inc .
dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 .
regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is that change over 100?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the price of the s&p 500 index in 2015?
[Turn 2] what was the price in 2010?
[Turn 3] what is the net change?
[Turn 4] what is that change over 100?

Pre-table text:
item 5 .
market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

Table:
	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015
loews common stock	100.0	97.37	106.04	126.23	110.59	101.72
s&p 500 index	100.0	102.11	118.45	156.82	178.29	180.75
loews peer group ( a )	100.0	101.59	115.19	145.12	152.84	144.70

Post-table text:
( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r .
berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p .
( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd .
and the travelers companies , inc .
dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 .
regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the 2015 value of outstanding fuel hedges less the 2014 value?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the 2015 value of outstanding fuel hedges less the 2014 value?

Pre-table text:
republic services , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 16 .
financial instruments fuel hedges we have entered into multiple swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges to mitigate some of our exposure related to changes in diesel fuel prices .
these swaps qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of forecasted diesel fuel purchases ( fuel hedges ) .
the following table summarizes our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2015 : year gallons hedged weighted average contract price per gallon .

Table:
year	gallons hedged	weighted average contractprice per gallon
2016	27000000	$ 3.57
2017	12000000	2.92

Post-table text:
if the national u.s .
on-highway average price for a gallon of diesel fuel as published by the department of energy exceeds the contract price per gallon , we receive the difference between the average price and the contract price ( multiplied by the notional gallons ) from the counterparty .
if the average price is less than the contract price per gallon , we pay the difference to the counterparty .
the fair values of our fuel hedges are determined using standard option valuation models with assumptions about commodity prices based on those observed in underlying markets ( level 2 in the fair value hierarchy ) .
the aggregate fair values of our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 were current liabilities of $ 37.8 million and $ 34.4 million , respectively , and have been recorded in other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets .
the ineffective portions of the changes in fair values resulted in a loss of $ 0.4 million and $ 0.5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 respectively , and a gain of less than $ 0.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , and have been recorded in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income .
total ( loss ) gain recognized in other comprehensive ( loss ) income for fuel hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ ( 2.0 ) million , $ ( 24.2 ) million and $ 2.4 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .
recycling commodity hedges revenue from the sale of recycled commodities is primarily from sales of old corrugated cardboard and old newspaper .
from time to time we use derivative instruments such as swaps and costless collars designated as cash flow hedges to manage our exposure to changes in prices of these commodities .
we had no outstanding recycling commodity hedges as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 .
no amounts were recognized in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income for the ineffective portion of the changes in fair values during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 .
total gain ( loss ) recognized in other comprehensive income for recycling commodity hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ 0.1 million and $ ( 0.1 ) million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .
no amount was recognized in other comprehensive income for 2015 .
fair value measurements in measuring fair values of assets and liabilities , we use valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs ( level 1 ) and minimize the use of unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) .
we also use market data or assumptions that we believe market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability , including assumptions about risk when appropriate. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the 2014 value?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the 2015 value of outstanding fuel hedges less the 2014 value?
[Turn 2] what is the 2014 value?

Pre-table text:
republic services , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 16 .
financial instruments fuel hedges we have entered into multiple swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges to mitigate some of our exposure related to changes in diesel fuel prices .
these swaps qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of forecasted diesel fuel purchases ( fuel hedges ) .
the following table summarizes our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2015 : year gallons hedged weighted average contract price per gallon .

Table:
year	gallons hedged	weighted average contractprice per gallon
2016	27000000	$ 3.57
2017	12000000	2.92

Post-table text:
if the national u.s .
on-highway average price for a gallon of diesel fuel as published by the department of energy exceeds the contract price per gallon , we receive the difference between the average price and the contract price ( multiplied by the notional gallons ) from the counterparty .
if the average price is less than the contract price per gallon , we pay the difference to the counterparty .
the fair values of our fuel hedges are determined using standard option valuation models with assumptions about commodity prices based on those observed in underlying markets ( level 2 in the fair value hierarchy ) .
the aggregate fair values of our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 were current liabilities of $ 37.8 million and $ 34.4 million , respectively , and have been recorded in other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets .
the ineffective portions of the changes in fair values resulted in a loss of $ 0.4 million and $ 0.5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 respectively , and a gain of less than $ 0.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , and have been recorded in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income .
total ( loss ) gain recognized in other comprehensive ( loss ) income for fuel hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ ( 2.0 ) million , $ ( 24.2 ) million and $ 2.4 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .
recycling commodity hedges revenue from the sale of recycled commodities is primarily from sales of old corrugated cardboard and old newspaper .
from time to time we use derivative instruments such as swaps and costless collars designated as cash flow hedges to manage our exposure to changes in prices of these commodities .
we had no outstanding recycling commodity hedges as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 .
no amounts were recognized in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income for the ineffective portion of the changes in fair values during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 .
total gain ( loss ) recognized in other comprehensive income for recycling commodity hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ 0.1 million and $ ( 0.1 ) million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .
no amount was recognized in other comprehensive income for 2015 .
fair value measurements in measuring fair values of assets and liabilities , we use valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs ( level 1 ) and minimize the use of unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) .
we also use market data or assumptions that we believe market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability , including assumptions about risk when appropriate. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is the change over the 2014 value?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what is the 2015 value of outstanding fuel hedges less the 2014 value?
[Turn 2] what is the 2014 value?
[Turn 3] what is the change over the 2014 value?

Pre-table text:
republic services , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 16 .
financial instruments fuel hedges we have entered into multiple swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges to mitigate some of our exposure related to changes in diesel fuel prices .
these swaps qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of forecasted diesel fuel purchases ( fuel hedges ) .
the following table summarizes our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2015 : year gallons hedged weighted average contract price per gallon .

Table:
year	gallons hedged	weighted average contractprice per gallon
2016	27000000	$ 3.57
2017	12000000	2.92

Post-table text:
if the national u.s .
on-highway average price for a gallon of diesel fuel as published by the department of energy exceeds the contract price per gallon , we receive the difference between the average price and the contract price ( multiplied by the notional gallons ) from the counterparty .
if the average price is less than the contract price per gallon , we pay the difference to the counterparty .
the fair values of our fuel hedges are determined using standard option valuation models with assumptions about commodity prices based on those observed in underlying markets ( level 2 in the fair value hierarchy ) .
the aggregate fair values of our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 were current liabilities of $ 37.8 million and $ 34.4 million , respectively , and have been recorded in other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets .
the ineffective portions of the changes in fair values resulted in a loss of $ 0.4 million and $ 0.5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 respectively , and a gain of less than $ 0.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , and have been recorded in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income .
total ( loss ) gain recognized in other comprehensive ( loss ) income for fuel hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ ( 2.0 ) million , $ ( 24.2 ) million and $ 2.4 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .
recycling commodity hedges revenue from the sale of recycled commodities is primarily from sales of old corrugated cardboard and old newspaper .
from time to time we use derivative instruments such as swaps and costless collars designated as cash flow hedges to manage our exposure to changes in prices of these commodities .
we had no outstanding recycling commodity hedges as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 .
no amounts were recognized in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income for the ineffective portion of the changes in fair values during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 .
total gain ( loss ) recognized in other comprehensive income for recycling commodity hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ 0.1 million and $ ( 0.1 ) million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .
no amount was recognized in other comprehensive income for 2015 .
fair value measurements in measuring fair values of assets and liabilities , we use valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs ( level 1 ) and minimize the use of unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) .
we also use market data or assumptions that we believe market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability , including assumptions about risk when appropriate. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what was the total of unrecognized tax benefits in 2015?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of unrecognized tax benefits in 2015?

Pre-table text:
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

Table:
december 31,	2016	2015	2014
balance at january 1	$ 373	$ 394	$ 392
additions for current year tax positions	8	7	7
additions for tax positions of prior years	1	12	14
reductions for tax positions of prior years	-1 ( 1 )	-7 ( 7 )	-2 ( 2 )
effects of foreign currency translation	2	-7 ( 7 )	-3 ( 3 )
settlements	-13 ( 13 )	-19 ( 19 )	-2 ( 2 )
lapse of statute of limitations	-1 ( 1 )	-7 ( 7 )	-12 ( 12 )
balance at december 31	$ 369	$ 373	$ 394

Post-table text:
the company and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years .
the company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit recorded .
while it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position , we believe we have appropriately accrued for our uncertain tax benefits .
however , audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty .
it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may exceed our provision for current unrecognized tax benefits in amounts that could be material , but cannot be estimated as of december 31 , 2016 .
our effective tax rate and net income in any given future period could therefore be materially impacted .
22 .
discontinued operations brazil distribution 2014 due to a portfolio evaluation in the first half of 2016 , management has decided to pursue a strategic shift of its distribution companies in brazil , aes sul and eletropaulo .
the disposal of sul was completed in october 2016 .
in december 2016 , eletropaulo underwent a corporate restructuring which is expected to , among other things , provide more liquidity of its shares .
aes is continuing to pursue strategic options for eletropaulo in order to complete its strategic shift to reduce aes 2019 exposure to the brazilian distribution business , including preparation for listing its shares into the novo mercado , which is a listing segment of the brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance .
the company executed an agreement for the sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary aes sul in june 2016 .
we have reported the results of operations and financial position of aes sul as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented .
upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria , the company recognized an after tax loss of $ 382 million comprised of a pretax impairment charge of $ 783 million , offset by a tax benefit of $ 266 million related to the impairment of the sul long lived assets and a tax benefit of $ 135 million for deferred taxes related to the investment in aes sul .
prior to the impairment charge in the second quarter , the carrying value of the aes sul asset group of $ 1.6 billion was greater than its approximate fair value less costs to sell .
however , the impairment charge was limited to the carrying value of the long lived assets of the aes sul disposal group .
on october 31 , 2016 , the company completed the sale of aes sul and received final proceeds less costs to sell of $ 484 million , excluding contingent consideration .
upon disposal of aes sul , we incurred an additional after- tax loss on sale of $ 737 million .
the cumulative impact to earnings of the impairment and loss on sale was $ 1.1 billion .
this includes the reclassification of approximately $ 1 billion of cumulative translation losses , resulting in a net reduction to the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity of $ 92 million .
sul 2019s pretax loss attributable to aes for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 1.4 billion and $ 32 million , respectively .
sul 2019s pretax gain attributable to aes for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 133 million .
prior to its classification as discontinued operations , sul was reported in the brazil sbu reportable segment .
as discussed in note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies , effective july 1 , 2014 , the company prospectively adopted asu no .
2014-08 .
discontinued operations prior to adoption of asu no .
2014-08 include the results of cameroon , saurashtra and various u.s .
wind projects which were each sold in the first half of cameroon 2014 in september 2013 , the company executed agreements for the sale of its 56% ( 56 % ) equity interests in businesses in cameroon : sonel , an integrated utility , kribi , a gas and light fuel oil plant , and dibamba , a heavy .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and what was it in 2014?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of unrecognized tax benefits in 2015?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2014?

Pre-table text:
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

Table:
december 31,	2016	2015	2014
balance at january 1	$ 373	$ 394	$ 392
additions for current year tax positions	8	7	7
additions for tax positions of prior years	1	12	14
reductions for tax positions of prior years	-1 ( 1 )	-7 ( 7 )	-2 ( 2 )
effects of foreign currency translation	2	-7 ( 7 )	-3 ( 3 )
settlements	-13 ( 13 )	-19 ( 19 )	-2 ( 2 )
lapse of statute of limitations	-1 ( 1 )	-7 ( 7 )	-12 ( 12 )
balance at december 31	$ 369	$ 373	$ 394

Post-table text:
the company and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years .
the company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit recorded .
while it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position , we believe we have appropriately accrued for our uncertain tax benefits .
however , audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty .
it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may exceed our provision for current unrecognized tax benefits in amounts that could be material , but cannot be estimated as of december 31 , 2016 .
our effective tax rate and net income in any given future period could therefore be materially impacted .
22 .
discontinued operations brazil distribution 2014 due to a portfolio evaluation in the first half of 2016 , management has decided to pursue a strategic shift of its distribution companies in brazil , aes sul and eletropaulo .
the disposal of sul was completed in october 2016 .
in december 2016 , eletropaulo underwent a corporate restructuring which is expected to , among other things , provide more liquidity of its shares .
aes is continuing to pursue strategic options for eletropaulo in order to complete its strategic shift to reduce aes 2019 exposure to the brazilian distribution business , including preparation for listing its shares into the novo mercado , which is a listing segment of the brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance .
the company executed an agreement for the sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary aes sul in june 2016 .
we have reported the results of operations and financial position of aes sul as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented .
upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria , the company recognized an after tax loss of $ 382 million comprised of a pretax impairment charge of $ 783 million , offset by a tax benefit of $ 266 million related to the impairment of the sul long lived assets and a tax benefit of $ 135 million for deferred taxes related to the investment in aes sul .
prior to the impairment charge in the second quarter , the carrying value of the aes sul asset group of $ 1.6 billion was greater than its approximate fair value less costs to sell .
however , the impairment charge was limited to the carrying value of the long lived assets of the aes sul disposal group .
on october 31 , 2016 , the company completed the sale of aes sul and received final proceeds less costs to sell of $ 484 million , excluding contingent consideration .
upon disposal of aes sul , we incurred an additional after- tax loss on sale of $ 737 million .
the cumulative impact to earnings of the impairment and loss on sale was $ 1.1 billion .
this includes the reclassification of approximately $ 1 billion of cumulative translation losses , resulting in a net reduction to the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity of $ 92 million .
sul 2019s pretax loss attributable to aes for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 1.4 billion and $ 32 million , respectively .
sul 2019s pretax gain attributable to aes for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 133 million .
prior to its classification as discontinued operations , sul was reported in the brazil sbu reportable segment .
as discussed in note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies , effective july 1 , 2014 , the company prospectively adopted asu no .
2014-08 .
discontinued operations prior to adoption of asu no .
2014-08 include the results of cameroon , saurashtra and various u.s .
wind projects which were each sold in the first half of cameroon 2014 in september 2013 , the company executed agreements for the sale of its 56% ( 56 % ) equity interests in businesses in cameroon : sonel , an integrated utility , kribi , a gas and light fuel oil plant , and dibamba , a heavy .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
by how much, then, did it change over the year?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of unrecognized tax benefits in 2015?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2014?
[Turn 3] by how much, then, did it change over the year?

Pre-table text:
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

Table:
december 31,	2016	2015	2014
balance at january 1	$ 373	$ 394	$ 392
additions for current year tax positions	8	7	7
additions for tax positions of prior years	1	12	14
reductions for tax positions of prior years	-1 ( 1 )	-7 ( 7 )	-2 ( 2 )
effects of foreign currency translation	2	-7 ( 7 )	-3 ( 3 )
settlements	-13 ( 13 )	-19 ( 19 )	-2 ( 2 )
lapse of statute of limitations	-1 ( 1 )	-7 ( 7 )	-12 ( 12 )
balance at december 31	$ 369	$ 373	$ 394

Post-table text:
the company and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years .
the company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit recorded .
while it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position , we believe we have appropriately accrued for our uncertain tax benefits .
however , audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty .
it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may exceed our provision for current unrecognized tax benefits in amounts that could be material , but cannot be estimated as of december 31 , 2016 .
our effective tax rate and net income in any given future period could therefore be materially impacted .
22 .
discontinued operations brazil distribution 2014 due to a portfolio evaluation in the first half of 2016 , management has decided to pursue a strategic shift of its distribution companies in brazil , aes sul and eletropaulo .
the disposal of sul was completed in october 2016 .
in december 2016 , eletropaulo underwent a corporate restructuring which is expected to , among other things , provide more liquidity of its shares .
aes is continuing to pursue strategic options for eletropaulo in order to complete its strategic shift to reduce aes 2019 exposure to the brazilian distribution business , including preparation for listing its shares into the novo mercado , which is a listing segment of the brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance .
the company executed an agreement for the sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary aes sul in june 2016 .
we have reported the results of operations and financial position of aes sul as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented .
upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria , the company recognized an after tax loss of $ 382 million comprised of a pretax impairment charge of $ 783 million , offset by a tax benefit of $ 266 million related to the impairment of the sul long lived assets and a tax benefit of $ 135 million for deferred taxes related to the investment in aes sul .
prior to the impairment charge in the second quarter , the carrying value of the aes sul asset group of $ 1.6 billion was greater than its approximate fair value less costs to sell .
however , the impairment charge was limited to the carrying value of the long lived assets of the aes sul disposal group .
on october 31 , 2016 , the company completed the sale of aes sul and received final proceeds less costs to sell of $ 484 million , excluding contingent consideration .
upon disposal of aes sul , we incurred an additional after- tax loss on sale of $ 737 million .
the cumulative impact to earnings of the impairment and loss on sale was $ 1.1 billion .
this includes the reclassification of approximately $ 1 billion of cumulative translation losses , resulting in a net reduction to the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity of $ 92 million .
sul 2019s pretax loss attributable to aes for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 1.4 billion and $ 32 million , respectively .
sul 2019s pretax gain attributable to aes for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 133 million .
prior to its classification as discontinued operations , sul was reported in the brazil sbu reportable segment .
as discussed in note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies , effective july 1 , 2014 , the company prospectively adopted asu no .
2014-08 .
discontinued operations prior to adoption of asu no .
2014-08 include the results of cameroon , saurashtra and various u.s .
wind projects which were each sold in the first half of cameroon 2014 in september 2013 , the company executed agreements for the sale of its 56% ( 56 % ) equity interests in businesses in cameroon : sonel , an integrated utility , kribi , a gas and light fuel oil plant , and dibamba , a heavy .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and how much did this change represent in relation to the 2014 total, in percentage?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of unrecognized tax benefits in 2015?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2014?
[Turn 3] by how much, then, did it change over the year?
[Turn 4] and how much did this change represent in relation to the 2014 total, in percentage?

Pre-table text:
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

Table:
december 31,	2016	2015	2014
balance at january 1	$ 373	$ 394	$ 392
additions for current year tax positions	8	7	7
additions for tax positions of prior years	1	12	14
reductions for tax positions of prior years	-1 ( 1 )	-7 ( 7 )	-2 ( 2 )
effects of foreign currency translation	2	-7 ( 7 )	-3 ( 3 )
settlements	-13 ( 13 )	-19 ( 19 )	-2 ( 2 )
lapse of statute of limitations	-1 ( 1 )	-7 ( 7 )	-12 ( 12 )
balance at december 31	$ 369	$ 373	$ 394

Post-table text:
the company and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years .
the company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit recorded .
while it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position , we believe we have appropriately accrued for our uncertain tax benefits .
however , audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty .
it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may exceed our provision for current unrecognized tax benefits in amounts that could be material , but cannot be estimated as of december 31 , 2016 .
our effective tax rate and net income in any given future period could therefore be materially impacted .
22 .
discontinued operations brazil distribution 2014 due to a portfolio evaluation in the first half of 2016 , management has decided to pursue a strategic shift of its distribution companies in brazil , aes sul and eletropaulo .
the disposal of sul was completed in october 2016 .
in december 2016 , eletropaulo underwent a corporate restructuring which is expected to , among other things , provide more liquidity of its shares .
aes is continuing to pursue strategic options for eletropaulo in order to complete its strategic shift to reduce aes 2019 exposure to the brazilian distribution business , including preparation for listing its shares into the novo mercado , which is a listing segment of the brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance .
the company executed an agreement for the sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary aes sul in june 2016 .
we have reported the results of operations and financial position of aes sul as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented .
upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria , the company recognized an after tax loss of $ 382 million comprised of a pretax impairment charge of $ 783 million , offset by a tax benefit of $ 266 million related to the impairment of the sul long lived assets and a tax benefit of $ 135 million for deferred taxes related to the investment in aes sul .
prior to the impairment charge in the second quarter , the carrying value of the aes sul asset group of $ 1.6 billion was greater than its approximate fair value less costs to sell .
however , the impairment charge was limited to the carrying value of the long lived assets of the aes sul disposal group .
on october 31 , 2016 , the company completed the sale of aes sul and received final proceeds less costs to sell of $ 484 million , excluding contingent consideration .
upon disposal of aes sul , we incurred an additional after- tax loss on sale of $ 737 million .
the cumulative impact to earnings of the impairment and loss on sale was $ 1.1 billion .
this includes the reclassification of approximately $ 1 billion of cumulative translation losses , resulting in a net reduction to the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity of $ 92 million .
sul 2019s pretax loss attributable to aes for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 1.4 billion and $ 32 million , respectively .
sul 2019s pretax gain attributable to aes for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 133 million .
prior to its classification as discontinued operations , sul was reported in the brazil sbu reportable segment .
as discussed in note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies , effective july 1 , 2014 , the company prospectively adopted asu no .
2014-08 .
discontinued operations prior to adoption of asu no .
2014-08 include the results of cameroon , saurashtra and various u.s .
wind projects which were each sold in the first half of cameroon 2014 in september 2013 , the company executed agreements for the sale of its 56% ( 56 % ) equity interests in businesses in cameroon : sonel , an integrated utility , kribi , a gas and light fuel oil plant , and dibamba , a heavy .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
and throughout the subsequent year of this period, what was that change in this total?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of unrecognized tax benefits in 2015?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2014?
[Turn 3] by how much, then, did it change over the year?
[Turn 4] and how much did this change represent in relation to the 2014 total, in percentage?
[Turn 5] and throughout the subsequent year of this period, what was that change in this total?

Pre-table text:
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

Table:
december 31,	2016	2015	2014
balance at january 1	$ 373	$ 394	$ 392
additions for current year tax positions	8	7	7
additions for tax positions of prior years	1	12	14
reductions for tax positions of prior years	-1 ( 1 )	-7 ( 7 )	-2 ( 2 )
effects of foreign currency translation	2	-7 ( 7 )	-3 ( 3 )
settlements	-13 ( 13 )	-19 ( 19 )	-2 ( 2 )
lapse of statute of limitations	-1 ( 1 )	-7 ( 7 )	-12 ( 12 )
balance at december 31	$ 369	$ 373	$ 394

Post-table text:
the company and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years .
the company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit recorded .
while it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position , we believe we have appropriately accrued for our uncertain tax benefits .
however , audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty .
it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may exceed our provision for current unrecognized tax benefits in amounts that could be material , but cannot be estimated as of december 31 , 2016 .
our effective tax rate and net income in any given future period could therefore be materially impacted .
22 .
discontinued operations brazil distribution 2014 due to a portfolio evaluation in the first half of 2016 , management has decided to pursue a strategic shift of its distribution companies in brazil , aes sul and eletropaulo .
the disposal of sul was completed in october 2016 .
in december 2016 , eletropaulo underwent a corporate restructuring which is expected to , among other things , provide more liquidity of its shares .
aes is continuing to pursue strategic options for eletropaulo in order to complete its strategic shift to reduce aes 2019 exposure to the brazilian distribution business , including preparation for listing its shares into the novo mercado , which is a listing segment of the brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance .
the company executed an agreement for the sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary aes sul in june 2016 .
we have reported the results of operations and financial position of aes sul as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented .
upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria , the company recognized an after tax loss of $ 382 million comprised of a pretax impairment charge of $ 783 million , offset by a tax benefit of $ 266 million related to the impairment of the sul long lived assets and a tax benefit of $ 135 million for deferred taxes related to the investment in aes sul .
prior to the impairment charge in the second quarter , the carrying value of the aes sul asset group of $ 1.6 billion was greater than its approximate fair value less costs to sell .
however , the impairment charge was limited to the carrying value of the long lived assets of the aes sul disposal group .
on october 31 , 2016 , the company completed the sale of aes sul and received final proceeds less costs to sell of $ 484 million , excluding contingent consideration .
upon disposal of aes sul , we incurred an additional after- tax loss on sale of $ 737 million .
the cumulative impact to earnings of the impairment and loss on sale was $ 1.1 billion .
this includes the reclassification of approximately $ 1 billion of cumulative translation losses , resulting in a net reduction to the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity of $ 92 million .
sul 2019s pretax loss attributable to aes for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 1.4 billion and $ 32 million , respectively .
sul 2019s pretax gain attributable to aes for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 133 million .
prior to its classification as discontinued operations , sul was reported in the brazil sbu reportable segment .
as discussed in note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies , effective july 1 , 2014 , the company prospectively adopted asu no .
2014-08 .
discontinued operations prior to adoption of asu no .
2014-08 include the results of cameroon , saurashtra and various u.s .
wind projects which were each sold in the first half of cameroon 2014 in september 2013 , the company executed agreements for the sale of its 56% ( 56 % ) equity interests in businesses in cameroon : sonel , an integrated utility , kribi , a gas and light fuel oil plant , and dibamba , a heavy .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.


[System] You are solving conversational numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the current question, dialogue history, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA-family DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Current question:
what is this change as a percentage of the 2015 unrecognized tax benefits?

Dialogue history:
[Turn 1] what was the total of unrecognized tax benefits in 2015?
[Turn 2] and what was it in 2014?
[Turn 3] by how much, then, did it change over the year?
[Turn 4] and how much did this change represent in relation to the 2014 total, in percentage?
[Turn 5] and throughout the subsequent year of this period, what was that change in this total?
[Turn 6] what is this change as a percentage of the 2015 unrecognized tax benefits?

Pre-table text:
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

Table:
december 31,	2016	2015	2014
balance at january 1	$ 373	$ 394	$ 392
additions for current year tax positions	8	7	7
additions for tax positions of prior years	1	12	14
reductions for tax positions of prior years	-1 ( 1 )	-7 ( 7 )	-2 ( 2 )
effects of foreign currency translation	2	-7 ( 7 )	-3 ( 3 )
settlements	-13 ( 13 )	-19 ( 19 )	-2 ( 2 )
lapse of statute of limitations	-1 ( 1 )	-7 ( 7 )	-12 ( 12 )
balance at december 31	$ 369	$ 373	$ 394

Post-table text:
the company and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years .
the company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit recorded .
while it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position , we believe we have appropriately accrued for our uncertain tax benefits .
however , audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty .
it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may exceed our provision for current unrecognized tax benefits in amounts that could be material , but cannot be estimated as of december 31 , 2016 .
our effective tax rate and net income in any given future period could therefore be materially impacted .
22 .
discontinued operations brazil distribution 2014 due to a portfolio evaluation in the first half of 2016 , management has decided to pursue a strategic shift of its distribution companies in brazil , aes sul and eletropaulo .
the disposal of sul was completed in october 2016 .
in december 2016 , eletropaulo underwent a corporate restructuring which is expected to , among other things , provide more liquidity of its shares .
aes is continuing to pursue strategic options for eletropaulo in order to complete its strategic shift to reduce aes 2019 exposure to the brazilian distribution business , including preparation for listing its shares into the novo mercado , which is a listing segment of the brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance .
the company executed an agreement for the sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary aes sul in june 2016 .
we have reported the results of operations and financial position of aes sul as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented .
upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria , the company recognized an after tax loss of $ 382 million comprised of a pretax impairment charge of $ 783 million , offset by a tax benefit of $ 266 million related to the impairment of the sul long lived assets and a tax benefit of $ 135 million for deferred taxes related to the investment in aes sul .
prior to the impairment charge in the second quarter , the carrying value of the aes sul asset group of $ 1.6 billion was greater than its approximate fair value less costs to sell .
however , the impairment charge was limited to the carrying value of the long lived assets of the aes sul disposal group .
on october 31 , 2016 , the company completed the sale of aes sul and received final proceeds less costs to sell of $ 484 million , excluding contingent consideration .
upon disposal of aes sul , we incurred an additional after- tax loss on sale of $ 737 million .
the cumulative impact to earnings of the impairment and loss on sale was $ 1.1 billion .
this includes the reclassification of approximately $ 1 billion of cumulative translation losses , resulting in a net reduction to the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity of $ 92 million .
sul 2019s pretax loss attributable to aes for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 1.4 billion and $ 32 million , respectively .
sul 2019s pretax gain attributable to aes for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 133 million .
prior to its classification as discontinued operations , sul was reported in the brazil sbu reportable segment .
as discussed in note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies , effective july 1 , 2014 , the company prospectively adopted asu no .
2014-08 .
discontinued operations prior to adoption of asu no .
2014-08 include the results of cameroon , saurashtra and various u.s .
wind projects which were each sold in the first half of cameroon 2014 in september 2013 , the company executed agreements for the sale of its 56% ( 56 % ) equity interests in businesses in cameroon : sonel , an integrated utility , kribi , a gas and light fuel oil plant , and dibamba , a heavy .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5829", "5735", ")", "EOF"]}
For number_turn cases, a valid program can also be a single numeric token followed by EOF, for example {"program_tokens": ["206588", "EOF"]}.