[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percent of the net change in revenue between 2006 and 2007 was due to transmission revenue?

Pre-table text:
entergy texas , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in power purchases as a result of the purchased power agreements between entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas and an increase in the average market prices of purchased power and natural gas , substantially offset by a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of decreased recovery from customers of fuel costs .
other regulatory charges increased primarily due to an increase of $ 6.9 million in the recovery of bond expenses related to the securitization bonds .
the recovery became effective july 2007 .
see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds .
2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2006 net revenue	$ 403.3
purchased power capacity	13.1
securitization transition charge	9.9
volume/weather	9.7
transmission revenue	6.1
base revenue	2.6
other	-2.4 ( 2.4 )
2007 net revenue	$ 442.3

Post-table text:
the purchased power capacity variance is due to changes in the purchased power capacity costs included in the calculation in 2007 compared to 2006 used to bill generation costs between entergy texas and entergy gulf states louisiana .
the securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds .
as discussed above , in june 2007 , egsrf i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds .
see note 5 to the financial statements herein for details of the securitization bond issuance .
the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage on billed retail sales , including the effects of more favorable weather in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 .
the increase is also due to an increase in usage during the unbilled sales period .
retail electricity usage increased a total of 139 gwh in all sectors .
see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues .
the transmission revenue variance is due to an increase in rates effective june 2007 and new transmission customers in late 2006 .
the base revenue variance is due to the transition to competition rider that began in march 2006 .
refer to note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate increase .
gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $ 179 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates and fuel refunds .
the decrease was partially offset by the $ 39 million increase in net revenue described above and an increase of $ 44 million in wholesale revenues , including $ 30 million from the system agreement cost equalization payments from entergy arkansas .
the receipt of such payments is being .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2016?

Pre-table text:
amortized over a nine-year period beginning december 2015 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather during the unbilled period and an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales .
the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry , and increased demand from new customers , primarily in the industrial gases industry .
the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc .
the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike .
see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .
included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . a0 see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .
entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2015 net revenue	$ 1666
nuclear realized price changes	-149 ( 149 )
rhode island state energy center	-44 ( 44 )
nuclear volume	-36 ( 36 )
fitzpatrick reimbursement agreement	41
nuclear fuel expenses	68
other	-4 ( 4 )
2016 net revenue	$ 1542

Post-table text:
as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 124 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices and lower capacity prices , the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa , and vermont yankee capacity revenue .
the effect of the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa and vermont yankee capacity revenue on the net revenue variance from 2015 to 2016 is minimal ; 2022 the sale of the rhode island state energy center in december 2015 .
see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale ; and 2022 lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more refueling outage days in 2016 as compared to 2015 and larger exercise of resupply options in 2016 as compared to 2015 .
see 201cnuclear matters - indian point 201d below for discussion of the extended indian point 2 outage in the second quarter entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the average percentage for aaa rated facilities in 2008 and 2009?

Pre-table text:
market street commitments by credit rating ( a ) december 31 , december 31 .

Table:
	december 31 2009	december 312008
aaa/aaa	14% ( 14 % )	19% ( 19 % )
aa/aa	50	6
a/a	34	72
bbb/baa	2	3
total	100% ( 100 % )	100% ( 100 % )

Post-table text:
( a ) the majority of our facilities are not explicitly rated by the rating agencies .
all facilities are structured to meet rating agency standards for applicable rating levels .
we evaluated the design of market street , its capital structure , the note , and relationships among the variable interest holders .
based on this analysis and under accounting guidance effective during 2009 and 2008 , we are not the primary beneficiary and therefore the assets and liabilities of market street are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .
we considered changes to the variable interest holders ( such as new expected loss note investors and changes to program- level credit enhancement providers ) , terms of expected loss notes , and new types of risks related to market street as reconsideration events .
we reviewed the activities of market street on at least a quarterly basis to determine if a reconsideration event has occurred .
tax credit investments we make certain equity investments in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies ( llcs ) that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the low income housing tax credit ( lihtc ) pursuant to sections 42 and 47 of the internal revenue code .
the purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital , to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings and to assist us in achieving goals associated with the community reinvestment act .
the primary activities of the investments include the identification , development and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants .
generally , these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity .
we typically invest in these partnerships as a limited partner or non-managing member .
also , we are a national syndicator of affordable housing equity ( together with the investments described above , the 201clihtc investments 201d ) .
in these syndication transactions , we create funds in which our subsidiaries are the general partner or managing member and sell limited partnership or non-managing member interests to third parties , and in some cases may also purchase a limited partnership or non-managing member interest in the fund .
the purpose of this business is to generate income from the syndication of these funds , generate servicing fees by managing the funds , and earn tax credits to reduce our tax liability .
general partner or managing member activities include selecting , evaluating , structuring , negotiating , and closing the fund investments in operating limited partnerships , as well as oversight of the ongoing operations of the fund portfolio .
we evaluate our interests and third party interests in the limited partnerships/llcs in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary .
the primary beneficiary determination is based on which party absorbs a majority of the variability .
the primary sources of variability in lihtc investments are the tax credits , tax benefits due to passive losses on the investments and development and operating cash flows .
we have consolidated lihtc investments in which we absorb a majority of the variability and thus are considered the primary beneficiary .
the assets are primarily included in equity investments and other assets on our consolidated balance sheet with the liabilities classified in other liabilities and third party investors 2019 interests included in the equity section as noncontrolling interests .
neither creditors nor equity investors in the lihtc investments have any recourse to our general credit .
the consolidated aggregate assets and liabilities of these lihtc investments are provided in the consolidated vies 2013 pnc is primary beneficiary table and reflected in the 201cother 201d business segment .
we also have lihtc investments in which we are not the primary beneficiary , but are considered to have a significant variable interest based on our interests in the partnership/llc .
these investments are disclosed in the non-consolidated vies 2013 significant variable interests table .
the table also reflects our maximum exposure to loss .
our maximum exposure to loss is equal to our legally binding equity commitments adjusted for recorded impairment and partnership results .
we use the equity and cost methods to account for our investment in these entities with the investments reflected in equity investments on our consolidated balance sheet .
in addition , we increase our recognized investments and recognize a liability for all legally binding unfunded equity commitments .
these liabilities are reflected in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .
credit risk transfer transaction national city bank , ( a former pnc subsidiary which merged into pnc bank , n.a .
in november 2009 ) sponsored a special purpose entity ( spe ) and concurrently entered into a credit risk transfer agreement with an independent third party to mitigate credit losses on a pool of nonconforming mortgage loans originated by its former first franklin business unit .
the spe was formed with a small equity contribution and was structured as a bankruptcy-remote entity so that its creditors have no recourse to us .
in exchange for a perfected security interest in the cash flows of the nonconforming mortgage loans , the spe issued to us asset-backed securities in the form of senior , mezzanine , and subordinated equity notes .
the spe was deemed to be a vie as its equity was not sufficient to finance its activities .
we were determined to be the primary beneficiary of the spe as we would absorb the majority of the expected losses of the spe through our holding of the asset-backed securities .
accordingly , this spe was consolidated and all of the entity 2019s assets , liabilities , and .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the company's net earnings as a percent of net sales in 2015 ? ( net profit margin )

Pre-table text:
zimmer biomet holdings , inc .
and subsidiaries 2017 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) year ended december 31 , 2017 compared to what it would have been under the previous accounting rules .
in may 2014 , the fasb issued asu 2014-09 2013 revenue from contracts with customers ( topic 606 ) .
this asu provides a five-step model for revenue recognition that all industries will apply to recognize revenue when a customer obtains control of a good or service .
this asu will be effective for us beginning january 1 , 2018 .
entities are permitted to apply the standard and related amendments either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the asu recognized at the date of initial application .
we have completed our assessment of this asu .
based upon our assessment , there will not be a material change to the timing of our revenue recognition .
however , we will be required to reclassify certain immaterial costs from selling , general and administrative ( 201csg&a 201d ) expense to net sales , which will result in a reduction of net sales , but have no impact on operating profit .
we will adopt this new standard using the retrospective method , which will result in us restating prior reporting periods presented .
in march 2017 , the fasb issued asu 2017-07 2013 improving the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost .
this asu requires us to report the service cost component of pensions in the same location as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period .
we will be required to report the other components of net benefit costs in other income ( expense ) in the statement of earnings .
this asu will be effective for us beginning january 1 , 2018 .
the asu must be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension cost in the statement of earnings and prospectively , on and after the effective date , for the capitalization of the service cost component of net periodic pension cost in assets .
see note 14 for further information on the components of our net benefit cost .
in february 2016 , the fasb issued asu 2016-02 2013 leases .
this asu requires lessees to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet .
this asu will be effective for us beginning january 1 , 2019 .
early adoption is permitted .
based on current guidance , this asu must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition approach at the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the consolidated financial statements .
we own most of our manufacturing facilities , but lease various office space and other less significant assets throughout the world .
we have formed our project team and have begun a process to collect the necessary information to implement this asu .
we will continue evaluating our leases and the related impact this asu will have on our consolidated financial statements throughout 2018 .
in august 2017 , the fasb issued asu 2017-12 2013 targeted improvements to accounting for hedging activities .
this asu amends the hedge accounting guidance to simplify the application of hedge accounting , makes more financial and nonfinancial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting treatment , changes how companies assess effectiveness and updates presentation and disclosure requirements .
we are currently evaluating the impact this asu will have on our consolidated financial statements ; however , based on our current hedging portfolio , we do not anticipate that this asu will have a significant impact on our financial position , results of operations or cash flows .
this asu will be effective for us january 1 , 2019 , with early adoption permitted .
after adoption , we may explore new hedging opportunities that are eligible for hedge accounting treatment under the new standard .
there are no other recently issued accounting pronouncements that we have not yet adopted that are expected to have a material effect on our financial position , results of operations or cash flows .
3 .
business combinations biomet merger we completed our merger with lvb , the parent company of biomet , on june 24 , 2015 .
we paid $ 12030.3 million in cash and stock and assumed biomet 2019s senior notes .
the total amount of merger consideration utilized for the acquisition method of accounting , as reduced by the merger consideration paid to holders of unvested lvb stock options and lvb stock- based awards of $ 90.4 million , was $ 11939.9 million .
the following table sets forth unaudited pro forma financial information derived from ( i ) the audited financial statements of zimmer for the year ended december 31 , 2015 ; and ( ii ) the unaudited financial statements of lvb for the period january 1 , 2015 to june 23 , 2015 .
the pro forma financial information has been adjusted to give effect to the merger as if it had occurred on january 1 , 2014 .
pro forma financial information ( unaudited ) year ended december 31 , 2015 ( in millions ) .

Table:
	year ended december 31 2015 ( in millions )
net sales	$ 7517.8
net earnings	$ 330.2

Post-table text:
these unaudited pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and include adjustments such as inventory step-up , amortization of acquired intangible assets and interest expense on debt incurred to finance the merger .
material , nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the biomet merger include : 2022 the $ 90.4 million of merger compensation expense for unvested lvb stock options and lvb stock-based awards was removed from net earnings for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and recognized as an expense in the year ended december 31 , 2014 .
2022 the $ 73.0 million of retention plan expense was removed from net earnings for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what were total heavy fuel oil sales in tbd for the three year period?

Pre-table text:
the catlettsburg refinery multi-year improvement project was completed during early 2004 .
at a cost of approximately $ 440 million , the project improves product yields and lowers overall refinery costs while making gasoline with less than 30 parts per million of sulfur , which allows map to meet tier ii gasoline regulations which became effective on january 1 , 2004 .
map is constructing approximately $ 300 million in new capital projects for its 74000 bpd detroit , michigan refinery .
one of the projects , a $ 110 million expansion project , is expected to raise the crude oil capacity at the refinery by 35 percent to 100000 bpd .
other projects are expected to enable the refinery to produce new clean fuels and further control regulated air emissions .
completion of the projects is scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2005 .
marketing in 2004 map 2019s refined product sales volumes ( excluding matching buy/sell transactions ) totaled 20.4 billion gallons ( 1329000 bpd ) .
the wholesale distribution of petroleum products to private brand marketers and to large commercial and industrial consumers , primarily located in the midwest , the upper great plains and the southeast , and sales in the spot market , accounted for approximately 70 percent of map 2019s refined product sales volumes in 2004 , excluding sales related to matching buy/sell transactions .
approximately 52 percent of map 2019s gasoline sales volumes and 92 percent of its distillate sales volumes were sold on a wholesale or spot market basis to independent unbranded customers or other wholesalers in 2004 .
approximately 55 percent of map 2019s propane is sold into the home heating markets and industrial consumers purchase the balance .
propylene , cumene , aromatics , aliphatics , and sulfur are marketed to customers in the chemical industry .
base lube oils and slack wax are sold throughout the united states .
pitch is also sold domestically , but approximately 16 percent of pitch products are exported into growing markets in canada , mexico , india and south america .
map markets asphalt through owned and leased terminals throughout the midwest , the upper great plains and the southeast .
the map customer base includes approximately 800 asphalt-paving contractors , government entities ( states , counties , cities and townships ) and asphalt roofing shingle manufacturers .
the following table sets forth the volume of map 2019s consolidated refined product sales by product group for each of the last three years : refined product sales ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2004 2003 2002 .

Table:
( thousands of barrels per day )	2004	2003	2002
gasoline	807	776	773
distillates	373	365	346
propane	22	21	22
feedstocks and special products	92	97	82
heavy fuel oil	27	24	20
asphalt	79	74	75
total	1400	1357	1318
matching buy/sell volumes included in above	71	64	71

Post-table text:
map sells reformulated gasoline in parts of its marketing territory , primarily chicago , illinois ; louisville , kentucky ; northern kentucky ; and milwaukee , wisconsin .
map also sells low-vapor-pressure gasoline in nine states .
as of december 31 , 2004 , map supplied petroleum products to about 3900 marathon and ashland branded retail outlets located primarily in michigan , ohio , indiana , kentucky and illinois .
branded retail outlets are also located in florida , georgia , wisconsin , west virginia , tennessee , minnesota , virginia , pennsylvania , north carolina , alabama , and south carolina .
ssa sells gasoline and diesel fuel through company-operated retail outlets .
as of december 31 , 2004 , ssa had 1669 retail outlets in nine states that sold petroleum products and convenience store merchandise and services , primarily under the brand names 2018 2018speedway 2019 2019 and 2018 2018superamerica . 2019 2019 ssa 2019s revenues from the sale of non-petroleum merchandise totaled $ 2.3 billion in 2004 , compared with $ 2.2 billion in 2003 .
profit levels from the sale of such merchandise and services tend to be less volatile than profit levels from the retail sale of gasoline and diesel fuel .
pilot travel centers llc ( 2018 2018ptc 2019 2019 ) , a joint venture with pilot corporation ( 2018 2018pilot 2019 2019 ) , is the largest operator of travel centers in the united states with approximately 250 locations in 35 states at december 31 , 2004 .
the travel centers .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the variation between the average and the highest operating margin?

Pre-table text:
reinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue decreased 2% ( 2 % ) in 2014 reflecting a 1% ( 1 % ) unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates and 1% ( 1 % ) decline in organic revenue growth due primarily to a significant unfavorable market impact in treaty , partially offset by net new business growth in treaty placements globally and growth in capital markets transactions and advisory business , as well as facultative placements .
operating income operating income increased $ 108 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , from 2013 to $ 1.6 billion in 2014 .
in 2014 , operating income margins in this segment were 21.0% ( 21.0 % ) , an increase of 120 basis points from 19.8% ( 19.8 % ) in 2013 .
operating margin improvement was driven by solid organic revenue growth , return on investments , expense discipline and savings related to the restructuring programs , partially offset by a $ 61 million unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates .
hr solutions .

Table:
years ended december 31	2014	2013	2012
revenue	$ 4264	$ 4057	$ 3925
operating income	485	318	289
operating margin	11.4% ( 11.4 % )	7.8% ( 7.8 % )	7.4% ( 7.4 % )

Post-table text:
our hr solutions segment generated approximately 35% ( 35 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2014 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration .
2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries .
2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management .
2022 investment consulting advises public and private companies , other institutions and trustees on developing and maintaining investment programs across a broad range of plan types , including defined benefit plans , defined contribution plans , endowments and foundations .
2022 benefits administration applies our human resource expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services .
our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions .
2022 exchanges is building and operating healthcare exchanges that provide employers with a cost effective alternative to traditional employee and retiree healthcare , while helping individuals select the insurance that best meets their needs .
2022 human resource business processing outsourcing provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and record and manage talent , workforce and other core human resource process transactions as well as other complementary services such as flexible spending , dependent audit and participant advocacy .
disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets created significant uncertainty in the marketplace .
weak economic conditions in many markets around the globe continued throughout 2014 and have adversely impacted our clients' financial condition and therefore the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate .
while we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and putting continued pressure on the pricing of those services , which is having an adverse effect on our new business and results of operations. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what portion of the revised purchase price of kichler is dedicated to goodwill?

Pre-table text:
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) c .
acquisitions on march 9 , 2018 , we acquired substantially all of the net assets of the l.d .
kichler co .
( "kichler" ) , a leader in decorative residential and light commercial lighting products , ceiling fans and led lighting systems .
this business expands our product offerings to our customers .
the results of this acquisition for the period from the acquisition date are included in the consolidated financial statements and are reported in the decorative architectural products segment .
we recorded $ 346 million of net sales as a result of this acquisition during 2018 .
the purchase price , net of $ 2 million cash acquired , consisted of $ 549 million paid with cash on hand .
since the acquisition , we have revised the allocation of the purchase price to identifiable assets and liabilities based on analysis of information as of the acquisition date that has been made available through december 31 , 2018 .
the allocation will continue to be updated through the measurement period , if necessary .
the preliminary allocation of the fair value of the acquisition of kichler is summarized in the following table , in millions. .

Table:
	initial	revised
receivables	$ 101	$ 100
inventories	173	166
prepaid expenses and other	5	5
property and equipment	33	33
goodwill	46	64
other intangible assets	243	240
accounts payable	-24 ( 24 )	-24 ( 24 )
accrued liabilities	-25 ( 25 )	-30 ( 30 )
other liabilities	-4 ( 4 )	-5 ( 5 )
total	$ 548	$ 549

Post-table text:
the goodwill acquired , which is generally tax deductible , is related primarily to the operational and financial synergies we expect to derive from combining kichler's operations into our business , as well as the assembled workforce .
the other intangible assets acquired consist of $ 59 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets , which is related to trademarks , and $ 181 million of definite-lived intangible assets .
the definite-lived intangible assets consist of $ 145 million related to customer relationships , which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 20 years , and $ 36 million of other definite-lived intangible assets , which is being amortized over a weighted average amortization period of three years .
in the fourth quarter of 2017 , we acquired mercury plastics , inc. , a plastics processor and manufacturer of water handling systems for appliance and faucet applications , for approximately $ 89 million in cash .
this business is included in the plumbing products segment .
this acquisition enhances our ability to develop faucet technology and provides continuity of supply of quality faucet components .
in connection with this acquisition , we recognized $ 38 million of goodwill , which is tax deductible , and is related primarily to the expected synergies from combining the operations into our business. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what were total tax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 in excess of the stock-based compensation expense for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested in millions?

Pre-table text:
stock-based awards under the plan stock options 2013 marathon grants stock options under the 2007 plan and previously granted options under the 2003 plan .
marathon 2019s stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant .
through 2004 , certain stock options were granted under the 2003 plan with a tandem stock appreciation right , which allows the recipient to instead elect to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock , as determined in accordance with the 2003 plan , over the option price of the shares .
in general , stock options granted under the 2007 plan and the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .
stock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted sars under the 2003 plan .
no stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan .
similar to stock options , stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price .
under the 2003 plan , certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options .
in general , sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .
stock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan .
no stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan .
beginning in 2005 , marathon discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grants cash-settled performance units to officers .
all stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited .
as a result , there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards .
restricted stock 2013 marathon grants restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan .
in 2005 , the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package .
the restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .
marathon also grants restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees ( 201crestricted stock awards 201d ) , based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes .
the restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .
prior to vesting , all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon .
the non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by marathon 2019s transfer agent .
common stock units 2013 marathon maintains an equity compensation program for its non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan .
all non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units , and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors .
when dividends are paid on marathon common stock , directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units .
stock-based compensation expense 2013 total employee stock-based compensation expense was $ 80 million , $ 83 million and $ 111 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .
the total related income tax benefits were $ 29 million , $ 31 million and $ 39 million .
in 2007 and 2006 , cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $ 27 million and $ 50 million .
tax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $ 30 million and $ 36 million .
cash settlements of stock option awards totaled $ 1 million and $ 3 million in 2007 and 2006 .
stock option awards granted 2013 during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , marathon granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees .
the weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions: .

Table:
	2007	2006	2005
weighted average exercise price per share	$ 60.94	$ 37.84	$ 25.14
expected annual dividends per share	$ 0.96	$ 0.80	$ 0.66
expected life in years	5.0	5.1	5.5
expected volatility	27% ( 27 % )	28% ( 28 % )	28% ( 28 % )
risk-free interest rate	4.1% ( 4.1 % )	5.0% ( 5.0 % )	3.8% ( 3.8 % )
weighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted	$ 17.24	$ 10.19	$ 6.15

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in 2016 what was the ratio of the net income increased to the net revenues

Pre-table text:
entergy arkansas , inc .
and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 27.4 million primarily due to higher nuclear refueling outage expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher interest expense , partially offset by higher other income .
2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses .
net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . a0 a0following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2016 net revenue	$ 1520.5
retail electric price	33.8
opportunity sales	5.6
asset retirement obligation	-14.8 ( 14.8 )
volume/weather	-29.0 ( 29.0 )
other	6.5
2017 net revenue	$ 1522.6

Post-table text:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .
a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 .
the increase was partially offset by decreases in the energy efficiency rider , as approved by the apsc , effective april 2016 and january 2017 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case and formula rate plan filings .
see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase .
the opportunity sales variance results from the estimated net revenue effect of the 2017 and 2016 ferc orders in the opportunity sales proceeding attributable to wholesale customers .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the opportunity sales proceeding. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the average weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2015 to 2017

Pre-table text:
of prior service cost or credits , and net actuarial gains or losses ) as part of non-operating income .
we adopted the requirements of asu no .
2017-07 on january 1 , 2018 using the retrospective transition method .
we expect the adoption of asu no .
2017-07 to result in an increase to consolidated operating profit of $ 471 million and $ 846 million for 2016 and 2017 , respectively , and a corresponding decrease in non-operating income for each year .
we do not expect any impact to our business segment operating profit , our consolidated net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting asu no .
2017-07 .
intangibles-goodwill and other in january 2017 , the fasb issued asu no .
2017-04 , intangibles-goodwill and other ( topic 350 ) , which eliminates the requirement to compare the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill ( commonly referred to as step 2 ) from the goodwill impairment test .
the new standard does not change how a goodwill impairment is identified .
wewill continue to perform our quantitative and qualitative goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount , but if we are required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , under the new standard the amount of the charge will be calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s fair value from its carrying amount .
under the prior standard , if we were required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , step 2 required us to calculate the implied value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the amount of the charge was calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s implied fair value of goodwill from its actual goodwill balance .
the new standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2019 , with early adoption permitted , and should be applied prospectively from the date of adoption .
we elected to adopt the new standard for future goodwill impairment tests at the beginning of the third quarter of 2017 , because it significantly simplifies the evaluation of goodwill for impairment .
the impact of the new standard will depend on the outcomes of future goodwill impairment tests .
derivatives and hedging inaugust 2017 , the fasb issuedasu no .
2017-12derivatives and hedging ( topic 815 ) , which eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness .
the guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2018 , with early adoption permitted .
we do not expect a significant impact to our consolidated assets and liabilities , net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting this new standard .
we plan to adopt the new standard january 1 , 2019 .
leases in february 2016 , the fasb issuedasu no .
2016-02 , leases ( topic 842 ) , which requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements for both lessees and lessors .
the new standard is effective january 1 , 2019 for public companies , with early adoption permitted .
the new standard currently requires the application of a modified retrospective approach to the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements .
we are continuing to evaluate the expected impact to our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures .
we plan to adopt the new standard effective january 1 , 2019 .
note 2 2013 earnings per share theweighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common sharewere as follows ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2017	2016	2015
weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations	287.8	299.3	310.3
weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards	2.8	3.8	4.4
weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations	290.6	303.1	314.7

Post-table text:
we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respectiveweighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .
our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method .
there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .
note 3 2013 acquisitions and divestitures acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation on november 6 , 2015 , we completed the acquisition of sikorsky from united technologies corporation ( utc ) and certain of utc 2019s subsidiaries .
the purchase price of the acquisition was $ 9.0 billion , net of cash acquired .
as a result of the acquisition .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage of total other assets in 2011 was comprised of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets?

Pre-table text:
notes to consolidated financial statements note 12 .
other assets other assets are generally less liquid , non-financial assets .
the table below presents other assets by type. .

Table:
in millions	as of december 2012	as of december 2011
property leasehold improvements andequipment1	$ 8217	$ 8697
goodwill and identifiable intangibleassets2	5099	5468
income tax-related assets3	5620	5017
equity-method investments4	453	664
miscellaneous receivables and other5	20234	3306
total	$ 39623	$ 23152

Post-table text:
1 .
net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $ 9.05 billion and $ 8.46 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively .
2 .
includes $ 149 million of intangible assets classified as held for sale .
see note 13 for further information about goodwill and identifiable intangible assets .
3 .
see note 24 for further information about income taxes .
4 .
excludes investments accounted for at fair value under the fair value option where the firm would otherwise apply the equity method of accounting of $ 5.54 billion and $ 4.17 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , which are included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value . 201d the firm has generally elected the fair value option for such investments acquired after the fair value option became available .
5 .
includes $ 16.77 billion of assets related to the firm 2019s reinsurance business which were classified as held for sale as of december 2012 .
assets held for sale in the fourth quarter of 2012 , the firm classified its reinsurance business within its institutional client services segment as held for sale .
assets related to this business of $ 16.92 billion , consisting primarily of available-for-sale securities and separate account assets at fair value , are included in 201cother assets . 201d liabilities related to the business of $ 14.62 billion are included in 201cother liabilities and accrued expenses . 201d see note 8 for further information about insurance-related assets and liabilities held for sale at fair value .
the firm expects to complete the sale of a majority stake in its reinsurance business in 2013 and does not expect to recognize a material gain or loss upon the sale .
upon completion of the sale , the firm will no longer consolidate this business .
property , leasehold improvements and equipment property , leasehold improvements and equipment included $ 6.20 billion and $ 6.48 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to property , leasehold improvements and equipment that the firm uses in connection with its operations .
the remainder is held by investment entities , including vies , consolidated by the firm .
substantially all property and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the asset .
leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the improvement or the term of the lease , whichever is shorter .
certain costs of software developed or obtained for internal use are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the software .
property , leasehold improvements and equipment are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that an asset 2019s or asset group 2019s carrying value may not be fully recoverable .
the firm 2019s policy for impairment testing of property , leasehold improvements and equipment is the same as is used for identifiable intangible assets with finite lives .
see note 13 for further information .
goldman sachs 2012 annual report 163 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
how many total votes can the class b-3 provide in 2017?

Pre-table text:
14 .
capital stock shares outstanding .
the following table presents information regarding capital stock: .

Table:
( in thousands )	december 31 , 2017	december 31 , 2016
class a common stock authorized	1000000	1000000
class a common stock issued and outstanding	339235	338240
class b-1 common stock authorized issued and outstanding	0.6	0.6
class b-2 common stock authorized issued and outstanding	0.8	0.8
class b-3 common stock authorized issued and outstanding	1.3	1.3
class b-4 common stock authorized issued and outstanding	0.4	0.4

Post-table text:
cme group has no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding .
associated trading rights .
members of cme , cbot , nymex and comex own or lease trading rights which entitle them to access open outcry trading , discounts on trading fees and the right to vote on certain exchange matters as provided for by the rules of the particular exchange and cme group 2019s or the subsidiaries 2019 organizational documents .
each class of cme group class b common stock is associated with a membership in a specific division for trading at cme .
a cme trading right is a separate asset that is not part of or evidenced by the associated share of class b common stock of cme group .
the class b common stock of cme group is intended only to ensure that the class b shareholders of cme group retain rights with respect to representation on the board of directors and approval rights with respect to the core rights described below .
trading rights at cbot are evidenced by class b memberships in cbot , at nymex by class a memberships in nymex and at comex by comex division memberships .
members of cbot , nymex and comex do not have any rights to elect members of the board of directors and are not entitled to receive dividends or other distributions on their memberships or trading permits .
core rights .
holders of cme group class b common shares have the right to approve changes in specified rights relating to the trading privileges at cme associated with those shares .
these core rights relate primarily to trading right protections , certain trading fee protections and certain membership benefit protections .
votes on changes to these core rights are weighted by class .
each class of class b common stock has the following number of votes on matters relating to core rights : class b-1 , six votes per share ; class b-2 , two votes per share ; class b-3 , one vote per share ; and class b-4 , 1/6th of one vote per share .
the approval of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares of class b common stock is required in order to approve any changes to core rights .
holders of shares of class a common stock do not have the right to vote on changes to core rights .
voting rights .
with the exception of the matters reserved to holders of cme group class b common stock , holders of cme group common stock vote together on all matters for which a vote of common shareholders is required .
in these votes , each holder of shares of class a or class b common stock of cme group has one vote per share .
transfer restrictions .
each class of cme group class b common stock is subject to transfer restrictions contained in the certificate of incorporation of cme group .
these transfer restrictions prohibit the sale or transfer of any shares of class b common stock separate from the sale of the associated trading rights .
election of directors .
the cme group board of directors is currently comprised of 20 members .
holders of class b-1 , class b-2 and class b-3 common stock have the right to elect six directors , of which three are elected by class b-1 shareholders , two are elected by class b-2 shareholders and one is elected by class b-3 shareholders .
the remaining directors are elected by the class a and class b shareholders voting as a single class. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the estimated percentual decrease observed in the htm investment securities from 2017 to 2018 ? .

Pre-table text:
management 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding , capital , structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks .
the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities .
treasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .
treasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives .
for further information on derivatives , refer to note 5 .
in addition , treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments .
for further information on liquidity and funding risk , refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100 .
for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131 .
the investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities , u.s .
and non-u.s .
government securities , obligations of u.s .
states and municipalities , other abs and corporate debt securities .
at december 31 , 2018 , the investment securities portfolio was $ 260.1 billion , and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and , where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) .
refer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .
selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 395 ) $ ( 78 ) $ 132 available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities ( period-end ) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities ( period-end ) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance , the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018 .
for additional information , refer to notes 1 and 10. .

Table:
as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )	2018	2017	2016
investment securities gains/ ( losses )	$ -395 ( 395 )	$ -78 ( 78 )	$ 132
available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average )	203449	219345	226892
held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average )	31747	47927	51358
investment securities portfolio ( average )	235197	267272	278250
afs investment securities ( period-end )	228681	200247	236670
htm investment securities ( period-end )	31434	47733	50168
investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end )	260115	247980	286838

Post-table text:
management 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding , capital , structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks .
the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities .
treasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .
treasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives .
for further information on derivatives , refer to note 5 .
in addition , treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments .
for further information on liquidity and funding risk , refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100 .
for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131 .
the investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities , u.s .
and non-u.s .
government securities , obligations of u.s .
states and municipalities , other abs and corporate debt securities .
at december 31 , 2018 , the investment securities portfolio was $ 260.1 billion , and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and , where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) .
refer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .
selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 395 ) $ ( 78 ) $ 132 available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities ( period-end ) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities ( period-end ) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance , the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018 .
for additional information , refer to notes 1 and 10. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in 2018 , what percentage of undeveloped acres were located in the u.s?

Pre-table text:
in the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future .
if production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years .
we plan to continue the terms of certain of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions ; however , the majority of the undeveloped acres associated with other africa as listed in the table below pertains to our licenses in ethiopia and kenya , for which we executed agreements in 2015 to sell .
the kenya transaction closed in february 2016 and the ethiopia transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2016 .
see item 8 .
financial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about this disposition .
net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 .

Table:
( in thousands )	net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016	net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017	net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2018
u.s .	68	89	128
e.g .	2014	92	36
other africa	189	4352	854
total africa	189	4444	890
other international	2014	2014	2014
total	257	4533	1018

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what are the total sales reported in 2012 , ( in billion ) ?

Pre-table text:
backlog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments .
backlog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months .
backlog by reportable segment as of october 26 , 2014 and october 27 , 2013 was as follows : 2014 2013 ( in millions , except percentages ) .

Table:
	2014	2013		( in millions except percentages )
silicon systems group	$ 1400	48% ( 48 % )	$ 1295	55% ( 55 % )
applied global services	775	27% ( 27 % )	591	25% ( 25 % )
display	593	20% ( 20 % )	361	15% ( 15 % )
energy and environmental solutions	149	5% ( 5 % )	125	5% ( 5 % )
total	$ 2917	100% ( 100 % )	$ 2372	100% ( 100 % )

Post-table text:
applied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or cancellation of orders .
customers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties .
delays in delivery schedules and/or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations .
manufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies ( collectively , parts ) that are used to manufacture systems .
applied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including the united states , europe , israel , singapore , taiwan , and other countries in asia , and assembly of some systems is completed at customer sites .
applied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products .
although applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible .
accordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers .
applied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by : ( 1 ) selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; ( 2 ) monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; ( 3 ) maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; ( 4 ) qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ( 5 ) locating certain manufacturing operations in close proximity to suppliers and customers .
research , development and engineering applied 2019s long-term growth strategy requires continued development of new products , including products that enable expansion into new markets .
the company 2019s significant investment in research , development and engineering ( rd&e ) has generally enabled it to deliver new products and technologies before the emergence of strong demand , thus allowing customers to incorporate these products into their manufacturing plans at an early stage in the technology selection cycle .
applied works closely with its global customers to design systems and processes that meet their planned technical and production requirements .
product development and engineering organizations are located primarily in the united states , as well as in europe , israel , taiwan , and china .
in addition , applied outsources certain rd&e activities , some of which are performed outside the united states , primarily in india and singapore .
process support and customer demonstration laboratories are located in the united states , china , taiwan , europe , and israel .
applied 2019s investments in rd&e for product development and engineering programs to create or improve products and technologies over the last three years were as follows : $ 1.4 billion ( 16 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2014 , $ 1.3 billion ( 18 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2013 , and $ 1.2 billion ( 14 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2012 .
applied has spent an average of 13 percent of net sales in rd&e over the last five years .
in addition to rd&e for specific product technologies , applied maintains ongoing programs for automation control systems , materials research , and environmental control that are applicable to its products. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the average liability for all three programs , as of december 31 , 2008 , in millions?

Pre-table text:
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total .

Table:
	2007 program	2003 program	2001 program	total
liability at december 31 2006	$ 2014	$ 12.6	$ 19.2	$ 31.8
net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments	19.1	-0.5 ( 0.5 )	-5.2 ( 5.2 )	13.4
payments and other1	-7.2 ( 7.2 )	-3.1 ( 3.1 )	-5.3 ( 5.3 )	-15.6 ( 15.6 )
liability at december 31 2007	$ 11.9	$ 9.0	$ 8.7	$ 29.6
net charges and adjustments	4.3	0.8	0.7	5.8
payments and other1	-15.0 ( 15.0 )	-4.1 ( 4.1 )	-3.5 ( 3.5 )	-22.6 ( 22.6 )
liability at december 31 2008	$ 1.2	$ 5.7	$ 5.9	$ 12.8

Post-table text:
1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates .
other reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb .
charges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs .
we expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 .
charges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete .
the charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
considering the year 2013 , what is the sales to operating income ratio?

Pre-table text:
equipment and energy .

Table:
	2013	2012	2011
sales	$ 451.1	$ 420.1	$ 400.6
operating income	65.5	44.6	62.8

Post-table text:
2013 vs .
2012 sales of $ 451.1 increased primarily from higher lng project activity .
operating income of $ 65.5 increased from the higher lng project activity .
the sales backlog for the equipment business at 30 september 2013 was $ 402 , compared to $ 450 at 30 september 2012 .
it is expected that approximately $ 250 of the backlog will be completed during 2014 .
2012 vs .
2011 sales of $ 420.1 increased 5% ( 5 % ) , or $ 19.5 , reflecting higher air separation unit ( asu ) activity .
operating income of $ 44.6 decreased 29% ( 29 % ) , or $ 18.2 , reflecting lower lng project activity .
the sales backlog for the equipment business at 30 september 2012 was $ 450 , compared to $ 334 at 30 september 2011 .
other operating income ( loss ) primarily includes other expense and income that cannot be directly associated with the business segments , including foreign exchange gains and losses .
also included are lifo inventory valuation adjustments , as the business segments use fifo , and the lifo pool valuation adjustments are not allocated to the business segments .
other also included stranded costs resulting from discontinued operations , as these costs were not reallocated to the businesses in 2012 .
2013 vs .
2012 other operating loss was $ 4.7 , compared to $ 6.6 in the prior year .
the current year includes an unfavorable lifo adjustment versus the prior year of $ 11 .
the prior year loss included stranded costs from discontinued operations of $ 10 .
2012 vs .
2011 other operating loss was $ 6.6 , compared to $ 39.3 in the prior year , primarily due to a reduction in stranded costs , a decrease in the lifo adjustment as a result of decreases in inventory values , and favorable foreign exchange , partially offset by gains on asset sales in the prior year. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in 2010 what was the percentage change in the deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits

Pre-table text:
the hartford financial services group , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 .
deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits ( continued ) results changes in the dac balance are as follows: .

Table:
	2011	2010	2009
balance january 1	$ 9857	$ 10686	$ 13248
deferred costs	2608	2648	2853
amortization 2014 dac	-2920 ( 2920 )	-2665 ( 2665 )	-3247 ( 3247 )
amortization 2014 dac from discontinued operations	2014	-17 ( 17 )	-10 ( 10 )
amortization 2014 unlock benefit ( charge ) pre-tax [1]	-507 ( 507 )	138	-1010 ( 1010 )
adjustments to unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale and other [2]	-377 ( 377 )	-1159 ( 1159 )	-1031 ( 1031 )
effect of currency translation	83	215	-39 ( 39 )
cumulative effect of accounting change pre-tax [3]	2014	11	-78 ( 78 )
balance december 31	$ 8744	$ 9857	$ 10686

Post-table text:
[1] the most significant contributors to the unlock charge recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2011 were assumption changes which reduced expected future gross profits including additional costs associated with implementing the japan hedging strategy and the u.s .
variable annuity macro hedge program , as well as actual separate account returns below our aggregated estimated return .
the most significant contributors to the unlock benefit recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2010 were actual separate account returns being above our aggregated estimated return .
also included in the benefit are assumption updates related to benefits from withdrawals and lapses , offset by hedging , annuitization estimates on japan products , and long-term expected rate of return updates .
the most significant contributors to the unlock charge recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2009 were the results of actual separate account returns being significantly below our aggregated estimated return for the first quarter of 2009 , partially offset by actual returns being greater than our aggregated estimated return for the period from april 1 , 2009 to december 31 , 2009 .
[2] the most significant contributor to the adjustments was the effect of declining interest rates , resulting in unrealized gains on securities classified in aoci .
other includes a $ 34 decrease as a result of the disposition of dac from the sale of the hartford investment canadian canada in 2010 .
[3] for the year ended december 31 , 2010 the effect of adopting new accounting guidance for embedded credit derivatives resulted in a decrease to retained earnings and , as a result , a dac benefit .
in addition , an offsetting amount was recorded in unrealized losses as unrealized losses decreased upon adoption of the new accounting guidance .
for the year ended december 31 , 2009 the effect of adopting new accounting guidance for investments other- than- temporarily impaired resulted in an increase to retained earnings and , as a result , a dac charge .
in addition , an offsetting amount was recorded in unrealized losses as unrealized losses increased upon adoption of the new accounting guidance .
as of december 31 , 2011 , estimated future net amortization expense of present value of future profits for the succeeding five years is $ 39 , $ 58 , $ 24 , $ 23 and $ 22 in 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 and 2016 , respectively. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
for 2015 and 2014 , what was the average in millions for provision recapture for purchased impaired loans?

Pre-table text:
during 2015 , $ 82 million of provision recapture was recorded for purchased impaired loans compared to $ 91 million of provision recapture during 2014 .
charge-offs ( which were specifically for commercial loans greater than a defined threshold ) during 2015 were $ 12 million compared to $ 42 million during 2014 .
at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , the alll on total purchased impaired loans was $ .3 billion and $ .9 billion , respectively .
the decline in alll was primarily due to the change in our derecognition policy .
for purchased impaired loan pools where an allowance has been recognized , subsequent increases in the net present value of cash flows will result in a provision recapture of any previously recorded alll to the extent applicable , and/or a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield , which will be recognized prospectively .
individual loan transactions where final dispositions have occurred ( as noted above ) result in removal of the loans from their applicable pools for cash flow estimation purposes .
the cash flow re- estimation process is completed quarterly to evaluate the appropriateness of the alll associated with the purchased impaired loans .
activity for the accretable yield during 2015 and 2014 follows : table 66 : purchased impaired loans 2013 accretable yield .

Table:
in millions	2015	2014
january 1	$ 1558	$ 2055
accretion ( including excess cash recoveries )	-466 ( 466 )	-587 ( 587 )
net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable	226	208
disposals	-68 ( 68 )	-118 ( 118 )
december 31	$ 1250	$ 1558

Post-table text:
note 5 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit allowance for loan and lease losses we maintain the alll at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date .
we use the two main portfolio segments 2013 commercial lending and consumer lending 2013 and develop and document the alll under separate methodologies for each of these segments as discussed in note 1 accounting policies .
a rollforward of the alll and associated loan data follows .
the pnc financial services group , inc .
2013 form 10-k 141 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was purchases of reserves in place in 2016?

Pre-table text:
supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) 2017 proved reserves decreased by 647 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 49 mmboe primarily due to the acceleration of higher economic wells in the bakken into the 5-year plan resulting in an increase of 44 mmboe , with the remainder being due to revisions across the business .
2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 116 mmboe primarily due to an increase of 97 mmboe associated with the expansion of proved areas and wells to sales from unproved categories in oklahoma .
2022 purchases of reserves in place : increased by 28 mmboe from acquisitions of assets in the northern delaware basin in new mexico .
2022 production : decreased by 145 mmboe .
2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 695 mmboe including 685 mmboe associated with the sale of our canadian business and 10 mmboe associated with divestitures of certain conventional assets in oklahoma and colorado .
see item 8 .
financial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding these dispositions .
2016 proved reserves decreased by 67 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 63 mmboe primarily due to an increase of 151 mmboe associated with the acceleration of higher economic wells in the u.s .
resource plays into the 5-year plan and a decrease of 64 mmboe due to u.s .
technical revisions .
2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 60 mmboe primarily associated with the expansion of proved areas and new wells to sales from unproven categories in oklahoma .
2022 purchases of reserves in place : increased by 34 mmboe from acquisition of stack assets in oklahoma .
2022 production : decreased by 144 mmboe .
2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 84 mmboe associated with the divestitures of certain wyoming and gulf of mexico assets .
2015 proved reserves decreased by 35 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : decreased by 2 mmboe primarily resulting from an increase of 105 mmboe associated with drilling programs in u.s .
resource plays and an increase of 67 mmboe in discontinued operations due to technical reevaluation and lower royalty percentages related to lower realized prices , offset by a decrease of 173 mmboe which was largely due to reductions to our capital development program and adherence to the sec 5-year rule .
2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by140 mmboe as a result of drilling programs in our u.s .
resource plays .
2022 production : decreased by 157 mmboe .
2022 sales of reserves in place : u.s .
conventional assets sales contributed to a decrease of 18 mmboe .
changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2017 , 546 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , a decrease of 6 mmboe from december 31 , 2016 .
the following table shows changes in proved undeveloped reserves for 2017 : ( mmboe ) .

Table:
beginning of year	552
revisions of previous estimates	5
improved recovery	2014
purchases of reserves in place	15
extensions discoveries and other additions	57
dispositions	2014
transfers to proved developed	-83 ( 83 )
end of year	546

Post-table text:
revisions of prior estimates .
revisions of prior estimates increased 5 mmboe during 2017 , primarily due to a 44 mmboe increase in the bakken from an acceleration of higher economic wells into the 5-year plan , offset by a decrease of 40 mmboe in oklahoma due to the removal of less economic wells from the 5-year plan .
extensions , discoveries and other additions .
increased 57 mmboe through expansion of proved areas in oklahoma. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
did the share of securities rated aaa/aaa increase between 2008 and 2009?

Pre-table text:
market street commitments by credit rating ( a ) december 31 , december 31 .

Table:
	december 31 2009	december 312008
aaa/aaa	14% ( 14 % )	19% ( 19 % )
aa/aa	50	6
a/a	34	72
bbb/baa	2	3
total	100% ( 100 % )	100% ( 100 % )

Post-table text:
( a ) the majority of our facilities are not explicitly rated by the rating agencies .
all facilities are structured to meet rating agency standards for applicable rating levels .
we evaluated the design of market street , its capital structure , the note , and relationships among the variable interest holders .
based on this analysis and under accounting guidance effective during 2009 and 2008 , we are not the primary beneficiary and therefore the assets and liabilities of market street are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .
we considered changes to the variable interest holders ( such as new expected loss note investors and changes to program- level credit enhancement providers ) , terms of expected loss notes , and new types of risks related to market street as reconsideration events .
we reviewed the activities of market street on at least a quarterly basis to determine if a reconsideration event has occurred .
tax credit investments we make certain equity investments in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies ( llcs ) that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the low income housing tax credit ( lihtc ) pursuant to sections 42 and 47 of the internal revenue code .
the purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital , to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings and to assist us in achieving goals associated with the community reinvestment act .
the primary activities of the investments include the identification , development and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants .
generally , these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity .
we typically invest in these partnerships as a limited partner or non-managing member .
also , we are a national syndicator of affordable housing equity ( together with the investments described above , the 201clihtc investments 201d ) .
in these syndication transactions , we create funds in which our subsidiaries are the general partner or managing member and sell limited partnership or non-managing member interests to third parties , and in some cases may also purchase a limited partnership or non-managing member interest in the fund .
the purpose of this business is to generate income from the syndication of these funds , generate servicing fees by managing the funds , and earn tax credits to reduce our tax liability .
general partner or managing member activities include selecting , evaluating , structuring , negotiating , and closing the fund investments in operating limited partnerships , as well as oversight of the ongoing operations of the fund portfolio .
we evaluate our interests and third party interests in the limited partnerships/llcs in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary .
the primary beneficiary determination is based on which party absorbs a majority of the variability .
the primary sources of variability in lihtc investments are the tax credits , tax benefits due to passive losses on the investments and development and operating cash flows .
we have consolidated lihtc investments in which we absorb a majority of the variability and thus are considered the primary beneficiary .
the assets are primarily included in equity investments and other assets on our consolidated balance sheet with the liabilities classified in other liabilities and third party investors 2019 interests included in the equity section as noncontrolling interests .
neither creditors nor equity investors in the lihtc investments have any recourse to our general credit .
the consolidated aggregate assets and liabilities of these lihtc investments are provided in the consolidated vies 2013 pnc is primary beneficiary table and reflected in the 201cother 201d business segment .
we also have lihtc investments in which we are not the primary beneficiary , but are considered to have a significant variable interest based on our interests in the partnership/llc .
these investments are disclosed in the non-consolidated vies 2013 significant variable interests table .
the table also reflects our maximum exposure to loss .
our maximum exposure to loss is equal to our legally binding equity commitments adjusted for recorded impairment and partnership results .
we use the equity and cost methods to account for our investment in these entities with the investments reflected in equity investments on our consolidated balance sheet .
in addition , we increase our recognized investments and recognize a liability for all legally binding unfunded equity commitments .
these liabilities are reflected in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .
credit risk transfer transaction national city bank , ( a former pnc subsidiary which merged into pnc bank , n.a .
in november 2009 ) sponsored a special purpose entity ( spe ) and concurrently entered into a credit risk transfer agreement with an independent third party to mitigate credit losses on a pool of nonconforming mortgage loans originated by its former first franklin business unit .
the spe was formed with a small equity contribution and was structured as a bankruptcy-remote entity so that its creditors have no recourse to us .
in exchange for a perfected security interest in the cash flows of the nonconforming mortgage loans , the spe issued to us asset-backed securities in the form of senior , mezzanine , and subordinated equity notes .
the spe was deemed to be a vie as its equity was not sufficient to finance its activities .
we were determined to be the primary beneficiary of the spe as we would absorb the majority of the expected losses of the spe through our holding of the asset-backed securities .
accordingly , this spe was consolidated and all of the entity 2019s assets , liabilities , and .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}