[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
considering the years 2013 and 2014 , what is the basis point variation observed in the operating margin?

Pre-table text:
reinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue decreased 2% ( 2 % ) in 2014 reflecting a 1% ( 1 % ) unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates and 1% ( 1 % ) decline in organic revenue growth due primarily to a significant unfavorable market impact in treaty , partially offset by net new business growth in treaty placements globally and growth in capital markets transactions and advisory business , as well as facultative placements .
operating income operating income increased $ 108 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , from 2013 to $ 1.6 billion in 2014 .
in 2014 , operating income margins in this segment were 21.0% ( 21.0 % ) , an increase of 120 basis points from 19.8% ( 19.8 % ) in 2013 .
operating margin improvement was driven by solid organic revenue growth , return on investments , expense discipline and savings related to the restructuring programs , partially offset by a $ 61 million unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates .
hr solutions .

Table:
years ended december 31	2014	2013	2012
revenue	$ 4264	$ 4057	$ 3925
operating income	485	318	289
operating margin	11.4% ( 11.4 % )	7.8% ( 7.8 % )	7.4% ( 7.4 % )

Post-table text:
our hr solutions segment generated approximately 35% ( 35 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2014 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration .
2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries .
2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management .
2022 investment consulting advises public and private companies , other institutions and trustees on developing and maintaining investment programs across a broad range of plan types , including defined benefit plans , defined contribution plans , endowments and foundations .
2022 benefits administration applies our human resource expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services .
our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions .
2022 exchanges is building and operating healthcare exchanges that provide employers with a cost effective alternative to traditional employee and retiree healthcare , while helping individuals select the insurance that best meets their needs .
2022 human resource business processing outsourcing provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and record and manage talent , workforce and other core human resource process transactions as well as other complementary services such as flexible spending , dependent audit and participant advocacy .
disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets created significant uncertainty in the marketplace .
weak economic conditions in many markets around the globe continued throughout 2014 and have adversely impacted our clients' financial condition and therefore the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate .
while we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and putting continued pressure on the pricing of those services , which is having an adverse effect on our new business and results of operations. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
if the hr solutions segment generated 35% ( 35 % ) of the consolidated revenue , what would be the total revenue for 2014 , ( in millions ) ?

Pre-table text:
reinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue decreased 2% ( 2 % ) in 2014 reflecting a 1% ( 1 % ) unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates and 1% ( 1 % ) decline in organic revenue growth due primarily to a significant unfavorable market impact in treaty , partially offset by net new business growth in treaty placements globally and growth in capital markets transactions and advisory business , as well as facultative placements .
operating income operating income increased $ 108 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , from 2013 to $ 1.6 billion in 2014 .
in 2014 , operating income margins in this segment were 21.0% ( 21.0 % ) , an increase of 120 basis points from 19.8% ( 19.8 % ) in 2013 .
operating margin improvement was driven by solid organic revenue growth , return on investments , expense discipline and savings related to the restructuring programs , partially offset by a $ 61 million unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates .
hr solutions .

Table:
years ended december 31	2014	2013	2012
revenue	$ 4264	$ 4057	$ 3925
operating income	485	318	289
operating margin	11.4% ( 11.4 % )	7.8% ( 7.8 % )	7.4% ( 7.4 % )

Post-table text:
our hr solutions segment generated approximately 35% ( 35 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2014 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration .
2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries .
2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management .
2022 investment consulting advises public and private companies , other institutions and trustees on developing and maintaining investment programs across a broad range of plan types , including defined benefit plans , defined contribution plans , endowments and foundations .
2022 benefits administration applies our human resource expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services .
our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions .
2022 exchanges is building and operating healthcare exchanges that provide employers with a cost effective alternative to traditional employee and retiree healthcare , while helping individuals select the insurance that best meets their needs .
2022 human resource business processing outsourcing provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and record and manage talent , workforce and other core human resource process transactions as well as other complementary services such as flexible spending , dependent audit and participant advocacy .
disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets created significant uncertainty in the marketplace .
weak economic conditions in many markets around the globe continued throughout 2014 and have adversely impacted our clients' financial condition and therefore the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate .
while we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and putting continued pressure on the pricing of those services , which is having an adverse effect on our new business and results of operations. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
was the notional amount of derivatives designated as hedging instruments under gaap greater than the notional amount of\\nderivatives not designated as hedging instruments under gaap?

Pre-table text:
note 17 financial derivatives we use derivative financial instruments ( derivatives ) primarily to help manage exposure to interest rate , market and credit risk and reduce the effects that changes in interest rates may have on net income , fair value of assets and liabilities , and cash flows .
we also enter into derivatives with customers to facilitate their risk management activities .
derivatives represent contracts between parties that usually require little or no initial net investment and result in one party delivering cash or another type of asset to the other party based on a notional amount and an underlying as specified in the contract .
derivative transactions are often measured in terms of notional amount , but this amount is generally not exchanged and it is not recorded on the balance sheet .
the notional amount is the basis to which the underlying is applied to determine required payments under the derivative contract .
the underlying is a referenced interest rate ( commonly libor ) , security price , credit spread or other index .
residential and commercial real estate loan commitments associated with loans to be sold also qualify as derivative instruments .
the following table presents the notional amounts and gross fair values of all derivative assets and liabilities held by pnc : table 127 : total gross derivatives .

Table:
in millions	december 31 2013 notional/contractamount	december 31 2013 assetfairvalue ( a )	december 31 2013 liabilityfairvalue ( b )	december 31 2013 notional/contractamount	december 31 2013 assetfairvalue ( a )	liabilityfairvalue ( b )
derivatives designated as hedging instruments under gaap	$ 36197	$ 1189	$ 364	$ 29270	$ 1872	$ 152
derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under gaap	345059	3604	3570	337086	6696	6458
total gross derivatives	$ 381256	$ 4793	$ 3934	$ 366356	$ 8568	$ 6610

Post-table text:
( a ) included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheet .
( b ) included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .
all derivatives are carried on our consolidated balance sheet at fair value .
derivative balances are presented on the consolidated balance sheet on a net basis taking into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements and any related cash collateral exchanged with counterparties .
further discussion regarding the rights of setoff associated with these legally enforceable master netting agreements is included in the offsetting , counterparty credit risk , and contingent features section below .
our exposure related to risk participations where we sold protection is discussed in the credit derivatives section below .
any nonperformance risk , including credit risk , is included in the determination of the estimated net fair value of the derivatives .
further discussion on how derivatives are accounted for is included in note 1 accounting policies .
derivatives designated as hedging instruments under gaap certain derivatives used to manage interest rate risk as part of our asset and liability risk management activities are designated as accounting hedges under gaap .
derivatives hedging the risks associated with changes in the fair value of assets or liabilities are considered fair value hedges , derivatives hedging the variability of expected future cash flows are considered cash flow hedges , and derivatives hedging a net investment in a foreign subsidiary are considered net investment hedges .
designating derivatives as accounting hedges allows for gains and losses on those derivatives , to the extent effective , to be recognized in the income statement in the same period the hedged items affect earnings .
the pnc financial services group , inc .
2013 form 10-k 189 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
by what amount have catastrophic losses in 2010 surpass the catastrophic losses of 2009 , ( in millions ) ?

Pre-table text:
the following table shows the impact of catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums and the impact of prior period development on our consolidated loss and loss expense ratio for the periods indicated. .

Table:
	2010	2009	2008
loss and loss expense ratio as reported	59.2% ( 59.2 % )	58.8% ( 58.8 % )	60.6% ( 60.6 % )
catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums	( 3.2 ) % (  % )	( 1.2 ) % (  % )	( 4.7 ) % (  % )
prior period development	4.6% ( 4.6 % )	4.9% ( 4.9 % )	6.8% ( 6.8 % )
large assumed loss portfolio transfers	( 0.3 ) % (  % )	( 0.8 ) % (  % )	0.0% ( 0.0 % )
loss and loss expense ratio adjusted	60.3% ( 60.3 % )	61.7% ( 61.7 % )	62.7% ( 62.7 % )

Post-table text:
we recorded net pre-tax catastrophe losses of $ 366 million in 2010 compared with net pre-tax catastrophe losses of $ 137 million and $ 567 million in 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
the catastrophe losses for 2010 were primarily related to weather- related events in the u.s. , earthquakes in chile , mexico , and new zealand , and storms in australia and europe .
the catastrophe losses for 2009 were primarily related to an earthquake in asia , floods in europe , several weather-related events in the u.s. , and a european windstorm .
for 2008 , the catastrophe losses were primarily related to hurricanes gustav and ike .
prior period development arises from changes to loss estimates recognized in the current year that relate to loss reserves first reported in previous calendar years and excludes the effect of losses from the development of earned premium from pre- vious accident years .
we experienced $ 503 million of net favorable prior period development in our p&c segments in 2010 .
this compares with net favorable prior period development in our p&c segments of $ 576 million and $ 814 million in 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
refer to 201cprior period development 201d for more information .
the adjusted loss and loss expense ratio declined in 2010 , compared with 2009 , primarily due to the impact of the crop settlements , non-recurring premium adjustment and the reduction in assumed loss portfolio business , which is written at higher loss ratios than other types of business .
our policy acquisition costs include commissions , premium taxes , underwriting , and other costs that vary with , and are primarily related to , the production of premium .
administrative expenses include all other operating costs .
our policy acquis- ition cost ratio increased in 2010 , compared with 2009 .
the increase was primarily related to the impact of crop settlements , which generated higher profit-share commissions and a lower adjustment to net premiums earned , as well as the impact of reinstatement premiums expensed in connection with catastrophe activity and changes in business mix .
our administrative expense ratio increased in 2010 , primarily due to the impact of the crop settlements , reinstatement premiums expensed , and increased costs in our international operations .
although the crop settlements generate minimal administrative expenses , they resulted in lower adjustment to net premiums earned in 2010 , compared with 2009 .
administrative expenses in 2010 , were partially offset by higher net results generated by our third party claims administration business , esis , the results of which are included within our administrative expenses .
esis generated $ 85 million in net results in 2010 , compared with $ 26 million in 2009 .
the increase is primarily from non-recurring sources .
our policy acquisition cost ratio was stable in 2009 , compared with 2008 , as increases in our combined insurance operations were offset by more favorable final crop year settlement of profit share commissions .
administrative expenses increased in 2009 , primarily due to the inclusion of administrative expenses related to combined insurance for the full year and costs associated with new product expansion in our domestic retail operation and in our personal lines business .
our effective income tax rate , which we calculate as income tax expense divided by income before income tax , is depend- ent upon the mix of earnings from different jurisdictions with various tax rates .
a change in the geographic mix of earnings would change the effective income tax rate .
our effective income tax rate was 15 percent in 2010 , compared with 17 percent and 24 percent in 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
the decrease in our effective income tax rate in 2010 , was primarily due to a change in the mix of earnings to lower tax-paying jurisdictions , a decrease in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits which was the result of a settlement with the u.s .
internal revenue service appeals division regarding federal tax returns for the years 2002-2004 , and the recognition of a non-taxable gain related to the acquisition of rain and hail .
the 2009 year included a reduction of a deferred tax valuation allowance related to investments .
for 2008 , our effective income tax rate was adversely impacted by a change in mix of earnings due to the impact of catastrophe losses in lower tax-paying jurisdictions .
prior period development the favorable prior period development , inclusive of the life segment , of $ 512 million during 2010 was the net result of sev- eral underlying favorable and adverse movements .
with respect to ace 2019s crop business , ace regularly receives reports from its managing general agent ( mga ) relating to the previous crop year ( s ) in subsequent calendar quarters and this typically results .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the total amount of cash outflow used for shares repurchased during october 2007 , in millions?

Pre-table text:
page 19 of 94 responded to the request for information pursuant to section 104 ( e ) of cercla .
the usepa has initially estimated cleanup costs to be between $ 4 million and $ 5 million .
based on the information available to the company at the present time , the company does not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect upon the liquidity , results of operations or financial condition of the company .
europe in january 2003 the german government passed legislation that imposed a mandatory deposit of 25 eurocents on all one-way packages containing beverages except milk , wine , fruit juices and certain alcoholic beverages .
ball packaging europe gmbh ( bpe ) , together with certain other plaintiffs , contested the enactment of the mandatory deposit for non-returnable containers based on the german packaging regulation ( verpackungsverordnung ) in federal and state administrative court .
all other proceedings have been terminated except for the determination of minimal court fees that are still outstanding in some cases , together with minimal ancillary legal fees .
the relevant industries , including bpe and its competitors , have successfully set up a germany-wide return system for one-way beverage containers , which has been operational since may 1 , 2006 , the date required under the deposit legislation .
item 4 .
submission of matters to a vote of security holders there were no matters submitted to the security holders during the fourth quarter of 2007 .
part ii item 5 .
market for the registrant 2019s common stock and related stockholder matters ball corporation common stock ( bll ) is traded on the new york stock exchange and the chicago stock exchange .
there were 5424 common shareholders of record on february 3 , 2008 .
common stock repurchases the following table summarizes the company 2019s repurchases of its common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 .
purchases of securities total number of shares purchased ( a ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .

Table:
	total number of shares purchased ( a )	average pricepaid per share	total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs	maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b )
october 1 to october 28 2007	705292	$ 53.53	705292	4904824
october 29 to november 25 2007	431170	$ 48.11	431170	4473654
november 26 to december 31 2007	8310 ( c )	$ 44.99	8310	4465344
total	1144772	$ 51.42	1144772

Post-table text:
( a ) includes open market purchases and/or shares retained by the company to settle employee withholding tax liabilities .
( b ) the company has an ongoing repurchase program for which shares are authorized for repurchase from time to time by ball 2019s board of directors .
on january 23 , 2008 , ball's board of directors authorized the repurchase by the company of up to a total of 12 million shares of its common stock .
this repurchase authorization replaces all previous authorizations .
( c ) does not include 675000 shares under a forward share repurchase agreement entered into in december 2007 and settled on january 7 , 2008 , for approximately $ 31 million .
also does not include shares to be acquired in 2008 under an accelerated share repurchase program entered into in december 2007 and funded on january 7 , 2008. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage of total net revenue investing & lending segment is due to equity securities in 2016?

Pre-table text:
the goldman sachs group , inc .
and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues in equities were $ 7.83 billion for 2015 , 16% ( 16 % ) higher than 2014 .
excluding a gain of $ 121 million ( $ 30 million and $ 91 million included in equities client execution and securities services , respectively ) in 2014 related to the extinguishment of certain of our junior subordinated debt , net revenues in equities were 18% ( 18 % ) higher than 2014 , primarily due to significantly higher net revenues in equities client execution across the major regions , reflecting significantly higher results in both derivatives and cash products , and higher net revenues in securities services , reflecting the impact of higher average customer balances and improved securities lending spreads .
commissions and fees were essentially unchanged compared with 2014 .
we elect the fair value option for certain unsecured borrowings .
the fair value net gain attributable to the impact of changes in our credit spreads on these borrowings was $ 255 million ( $ 214 million and $ 41 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2015 , compared with a net gain of $ 144 million ( $ 108 million and $ 36 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2014 .
operating expenses were $ 13.94 billion for 2015 , 28% ( 28 % ) higher than 2014 , due to significantly higher net provisions for mortgage-related litigation and regulatory matters , partially offset by decreased compensation and benefits expenses .
pre-tax earnings were $ 1.21 billion in 2015 , 72% ( 72 % ) lower than 2014 .
investing & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans , including our relationship lending activities , to provide financing to clients .
these investments and loans are typically longer-term in nature .
we make investments , some of which are consolidated , directly and indirectly through funds that we manage , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , infrastructure and real estate entities .
we also make unsecured loans to individuals through our online platform .
the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. .

Table:
$ in millions	year ended december 2016	year ended december 2015	year ended december 2014
equity securities	$ 2573	$ 3781	$ 4579
debt securities and loans	1507	1655	2246
total net revenues	4080	5436	6825
operating expenses	2386	2402	2819
pre-tax earnings	$ 1694	$ 3034	$ 4006

Post-table text:
operating environment .
following difficult market conditions and the impact of a challenging macroeconomic environment on corporate performance , particularly in the energy sector , in the first quarter of 2016 , market conditions improved during the rest of the year as macroeconomic concerns moderated .
global equity markets increased during 2016 , contributing to net gains from investments in public equities , and corporate performance rebounded from the difficult start to the year .
if macroeconomic concerns negatively affect corporate performance or company-specific events , or if global equity markets decline , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted .
although net revenues in investing & lending for 2015 benefited from favorable company-specific events , including sales , initial public offerings and financings , a decline in global equity prices and widening high-yield credit spreads during the second half of 2015 impacted results .
2016 versus 2015 .
net revenues in investing & lending were $ 4.08 billion for 2016 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2015 .
this decrease was primarily due to significantly lower net revenues from investments in equities , primarily reflecting a significant decrease in net gains from private equities , driven by company-specific events and corporate performance .
in addition , net revenues in debt securities and loans were lower compared with 2015 , reflecting significantly lower net revenues related to relationship lending activities , due to the impact of changes in credit spreads on economic hedges .
losses related to these hedges were $ 596 million in 2016 , compared with gains of $ 329 million in 2015 .
this decrease was partially offset by higher net gains from investments in debt instruments and higher net interest income .
see note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about economic hedges related to our relationship lending activities .
operating expenses were $ 2.39 billion for 2016 , essentially unchanged compared with 2015 .
pre-tax earnings were $ 1.69 billion in 2016 , 44% ( 44 % ) lower than 2015 .
2015 versus 2014 .
net revenues in investing & lending were $ 5.44 billion for 2015 , 20% ( 20 % ) lower than 2014 .
this decrease was primarily due to lower net revenues from investments in equities , principally reflecting the sale of metro in the fourth quarter of 2014 and lower net gains from investments in private equities , driven by corporate performance .
in addition , net revenues in debt securities and loans were significantly lower , reflecting lower net gains from investments .
goldman sachs 2016 form 10-k 63 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return for ball corporation compared to the s&p 500 index for the five year period ending 12/31/10?

Pre-table text:
page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 .
it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested .
the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization .
total return analysis .

Table:
	12/31/05	12/31/06	12/31/07	12/31/08	12/31/09	12/31/10
ball corporation	$ 100.00	$ 110.86	$ 115.36	$ 107.58	$ 134.96	$ 178.93
dj containers & packaging index	$ 100.00	$ 112.09	$ 119.63	$ 75.00	$ 105.34	$ 123.56
s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 115.80	$ 122.16	$ 76.96	$ 97.33	$ 111.99
copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )
copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what portion of the total identifiable net assets is in cash?

Pre-table text:
the estimated acquisition-date fair values of major classes of assets acquired and liabilities assumed , including a reconciliation to the total purchase consideration , are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
cash	$ 45826
customer-related intangible assets	42721
acquired technology	27954
trade name	2901
other assets	2337
deferred income tax assets ( liabilities )	-9788 ( 9788 )
other liabilities	-49797 ( 49797 )
total identifiable net assets	62154
goodwill	203828
total purchase consideration	$ 265982

Post-table text:
goodwill of $ 203.8 million arising from the acquisition , included in the asia-pacific segment , was attributable to expected growth opportunities in australia and new zealand , as well as growth opportunities and operating synergies in integrated payments in our existing asia-pacific and north america markets .
goodwill associated with this acquisition is not deductible for income tax purposes .
the customer-related intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 15 years .
the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 15 years .
the trade name has an estimated amortization period of 5 years .
note 3 2014 settlement processing assets and obligations funds settlement refers to the process of transferring funds for sales and credits between card issuers and merchants .
for transactions processed on our systems , we use our internal network to provide funding instructions to financial institutions that in turn fund the merchants .
we process funds settlement under two models , a sponsorship model and a direct membership model .
under the sponsorship model , we are designated as a merchant service provider by mastercard and an independent sales organization by visa , which means that member clearing banks ( 201cmember 201d ) sponsor us and require our adherence to the standards of the payment networks .
in certain markets , we have sponsorship or depository and clearing agreements with financial institution sponsors .
these agreements allow us to route transactions under the members 2019 control and identification numbers to clear credit card transactions through mastercard and visa .
in this model , the standards of the payment networks restrict us from performing funds settlement or accessing merchant settlement funds , and , instead , require that these funds be in the possession of the member until the merchant is funded .
under the direct membership model , we are members in various payment networks , allowing us to process and fund transactions without third-party sponsorship .
in this model , we route and clear transactions directly through the card brand 2019s network and are not restricted from performing funds settlement .
otherwise , we process these transactions similarly to how we process transactions in the sponsorship model .
we are required to adhere to the standards of the payment networks in which we are direct members .
we maintain relationships with financial institutions , which may also serve as our member sponsors for other card brands or in other markets , to assist with funds settlement .
timing differences , interchange fees , merchant reserves and exception items cause differences between the amount received from the payment networks and the amount funded to the merchants .
these intermediary balances arising in our settlement process for direct merchants are reflected as settlement processing assets and obligations on our consolidated balance sheets .
settlement processing assets and obligations include the components outlined below : 2022 interchange reimbursement .
our receivable from merchants for the portion of the discount fee related to reimbursement of the interchange fee .
global payments inc .
| 2017 form 10-k annual report 2013 77 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
by what percentage can cme increase their current line of credit?

Pre-table text:
2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts .
in the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation .
these assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights .
in addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm .
thereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package .
we would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit .
we maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing .
we have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion .
we may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms .
the credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit .
pledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s .
treasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs .
performance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line .
in addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default .
aggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit .
a defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm .
the following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) .
.
.
.
.
2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit .
( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms .
( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund .
( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .

Table:
( in millions )	cme clearingavailable assets
designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 )	$ 100.0
guaranty fund contributions ( 2 )	2899.5
assessment powers ( 3 )	7973.6
minimum total assets available for default ( 4 )	$ 10973.1

Post-table text:
2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts .
in the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation .
these assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights .
in addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm .
thereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package .
we would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit .
we maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing .
we have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion .
we may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms .
the credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit .
pledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s .
treasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs .
performance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line .
in addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default .
aggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit .
a defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm .
the following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) .
.
.
.
.
2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit .
( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms .
( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund .
( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
goodwill comprises what percentage of total assets acquired?

Pre-table text:
use of estimates the preparation of the financial statements requires management to make a number of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period .
actual results could differ from those estimates .
( 3 ) significant acquisitions and dispositions acquisitions we acquired total income producing real estate related assets of $ 219.9 million , $ 948.4 million and $ 295.6 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively .
in december 2007 , in order to further establish our property positions around strategic port locations , we purchased a portfolio of five industrial buildings , in seattle , virginia and houston , as well as approximately 161 acres of undeveloped land and a 12-acre container storage facility in houston .
the total price was $ 89.7 million and was financed in part through assumption of secured debt that had a fair value of $ 34.3 million .
of the total purchase price , $ 66.1 million was allocated to in-service real estate assets , $ 20.0 million was allocated to undeveloped land and the container storage facility , $ 3.3 million was allocated to lease related intangible assets , and the remaining amount was allocated to acquired working capital related assets and liabilities .
this allocation of purchase price based on the fair value of assets acquired is preliminary .
the results of operations for the acquired properties since the date of acquisition have been included in continuing rental operations in our consolidated financial statements .
in february 2007 , we completed the acquisition of bremner healthcare real estate ( 201cbremner 201d ) , a national health care development and management firm .
the primary reason for the acquisition was to expand our development capabilities within the health care real estate market .
the initial consideration paid to the sellers totaled $ 47.1 million , and the sellers may be eligible for further contingent payments over the next three years .
approximately $ 39.0 million of the total purchase price was allocated to goodwill , which is attributable to the value of bremner 2019s overall development capabilities and its in-place workforce .
the results of operations for bremner since the date of acquisition have been included in continuing operations in our consolidated financial statements .
in february 2006 , we acquired the majority of a washington , d.c .
metropolitan area portfolio of suburban office and light industrial properties ( the 201cmark winkler portfolio 201d ) .
the assets acquired for a purchase price of approximately $ 867.6 million are comprised of 32 in-service properties with approximately 2.9 million square feet for rental , 166 acres of undeveloped land , as well as certain related assets of the mark winkler company , a real estate management company .
the acquisition was financed primarily through assumed mortgage loans and new borrowings .
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition , as summarized below ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
operating rental properties	$ 602011
land held for development	154300
total real estate investments	756311
other assets	10478
lease related intangible assets	86047
goodwill	14722
total assets acquired	867558
debt assumed	-148527 ( 148527 )
other liabilities assumed	-5829 ( 5829 )
purchase price net of assumed liabilities	$ 713202

Post-table text:
purchase price , net of assumed liabilities $ 713202 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
how much of the firm-sponsored qspes that hold asf framework loans are serviced by the firm?

Pre-table text:
jpmorgan chase & co .
/ 2007 annual report 145 subprime adjustable-rate mortgage loan modifications see the glossary of terms on page 183 of this annual report for the firm 2019s definition of subprime loans .
within the confines of the limited decision-making abilities of a qspe under sfas 140 , the operating doc- uments that govern existing subprime securitizations generally authorize the servicer to modify loans for which default is reasonably foreseeable , provided that the modification is in the best interests of the qspe 2019s ben- eficial interest holders , and would not result in a remic violation .
in december 2007 , the american securitization forum ( 201casf 201d ) issued the 201cstreamlined foreclosure and loss avoidance framework for securitized subprime adjustable rate mortgage loans 201d ( 201cthe framework 201d ) .
the framework provides guidance for servicers to stream- line evaluation procedures for borrowers with certain subprime adjustable rate mortgage ( 201carm 201d ) loans to more efficiently provide modifications of such loans with terms that are more appropriate for the individual needs of such borrowers .
the framework applies to all first-lien subprime arm loans that have a fixed rate of interest for an initial period of 36 months or less , are included in securitized pools , were originated between january 1 , 2005 , and july 31 , 2007 , and have an initial interest rate reset date between january 1 , 2008 , and july 31 , 2010 ( 201casf framework loans 201d ) .
the framework categorizes the population of asf framework loans into three segments .
segment 1 includes loans where the borrower is current and is likely to be able to refinance into any available mortgage product .
segment 2 includes loans where the borrower is current , is unlikely to be able to refinance into any readily available mortgage industry product and meets certain defined criteria .
segment 3 includes loans where the borrower is not current , as defined , and does not meet the criteria for segments 1 or 2 .
asf framework loans in segment 2 of the framework are eligible for fast-track modification under which the interest rate will be kept at the existing initial rate , generally for five years following the interest rate reset date .
the framework indicates that for segment 2 loans , jpmorgan chase , as servicer , may presume that the borrower will be unable to make payments pursuant to the original terms of the borrower 2019s loan after the initial interest rate reset date .
thus , the firm may presume that a default on that loan by the borrower is reasonably foreseeable unless the terms of the loan are modified .
jpmorgan chase has adopted the loss mitigation approaches under the framework for securitized sub- prime loans that meet the specific segment 2 screening criteria , and it expects to begin modifying segment 2 loans by the end of the first quar- ter of 2008 .
the firm believes that the adoption of the framework will not affect the off-balance sheet accounting treatment of jpmorgan chase-sponsored qspes that hold segment 2 subprime loans .
the total amount of assets owned by firm-sponsored qspes that hold asf framework loans ( including those loans that are not serviced by the firm ) as of december 31 , 2007 , was $ 20.0 billion .
of this amount , $ 9.7 billion relates to asf framework loans serviced by the firm .
based on current economic conditions , the firm estimates that approximately 20% ( 20 % ) , 10% ( 10 % ) and 70% ( 70 % ) of the asf framework loans it services that are owned by firm-sponsored qspes will fall within segments 1 , 2 and 3 , respectively .
this estimate could change substantially as a result of unanticipated changes in housing values , economic conditions , investor/borrower behavior and other factors .
the total principal amount of beneficial interests issued by firm-spon- sored securitizations that hold asf framework loans as of december 31 , 2007 , was as follows. .

Table:
december 31 2007 ( in millions )	2007
third-party	$ 19636
retained interest	412
total	$ 20048

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in 2018 what was the percent of the total commitments to extend credit and other commitments for home equity lines of credit

Pre-table text:
the pnc financial services group , inc .
2013 form 10-k 155 of such other legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial position .
however , we cannot now determine whether or not any claims asserted against us or others to whom we may have indemnification obligations , whether in the proceedings or other matters described above or otherwise , will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in any future reporting period , which will depend on , among other things , the amount of the loss resulting from the claim and the amount of income otherwise reported for the reporting period .
note 20 commitments in the normal course of business , we have various commitments outstanding , certain of which are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .
the following table presents our outstanding commitments to extend credit along with significant other commitments as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .
table 94 : commitments to extend credit and other commitments in millions december 31 december 31 .

Table:
in millions	december 31 2018	december 312017
commitments to extend credit
total commercial lending	$ 120165	$ 112125
home equity lines of credit	16944	17852
credit card	27100	24911
other	5069	4753
total commitments to extend credit	169278	159641
net outstanding standby letters of credit ( a )	8655	8651
reinsurance agreements ( b )	1549	1654
standby bond purchase agreements ( c )	1000	843
other commitments ( d )	1130	1732
total commitments to extend credit and other commitments	$ 181612	$ 172521

Post-table text:
commitments to extend credit , or net unfunded loan commitments , represent arrangements to lend funds or provide liquidity subject to specified contractual conditions .
these commitments generally have fixed expiration dates , may require payment of a fee , and generally contain termination clauses in the event the customer 2019s credit quality deteriorates .
net outstanding standby letters of credit we issue standby letters of credit and share in the risk of standby letters of credit issued by other financial institutions , in each case to support obligations of our customers to third parties , such as insurance requirements and the facilitation of transactions involving capital markets product execution .
approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of our net outstanding standby letters of credit were rated as pass at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , with the remainder rated as criticized .
an internal credit rating of pass indicates the expected risk of loss is currently low , while a rating of criticized indicates a higher degree of risk .
if the customer fails to meet its financial or performance obligation to the third party under the terms of the contract or there is a need to support a remarketing program , then upon a draw by a beneficiary , subject to the terms of the letter of credit , we would be obligated to make payment to them .
the standby letters of credit outstanding on december 31 , 2018 had terms ranging from less than one year to six years .
as of december 31 , 2018 , assets of $ 1.1 billion secured certain specifically identified standby letters of credit .
in addition , a portion of the remaining standby letters of credit issued on behalf of specific customers is also secured by collateral or guarantees that secure the customers 2019 other obligations to us .
the carrying amount of the liability for our obligations related to standby letters of credit and participations in standby letters of credit was $ .2 billion at december 31 , 2018 and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
as of december 31 , 2011 , what was the percentage change in the estimated future net amortization expense of present value of future profits from 2013 to 2014

Pre-table text:
the hartford financial services group , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 .
deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits ( continued ) results changes in the dac balance are as follows: .

Table:
	2011	2010	2009
balance january 1	$ 9857	$ 10686	$ 13248
deferred costs	2608	2648	2853
amortization 2014 dac	-2920 ( 2920 )	-2665 ( 2665 )	-3247 ( 3247 )
amortization 2014 dac from discontinued operations	2014	-17 ( 17 )	-10 ( 10 )
amortization 2014 unlock benefit ( charge ) pre-tax [1]	-507 ( 507 )	138	-1010 ( 1010 )
adjustments to unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale and other [2]	-377 ( 377 )	-1159 ( 1159 )	-1031 ( 1031 )
effect of currency translation	83	215	-39 ( 39 )
cumulative effect of accounting change pre-tax [3]	2014	11	-78 ( 78 )
balance december 31	$ 8744	$ 9857	$ 10686

Post-table text:
[1] the most significant contributors to the unlock charge recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2011 were assumption changes which reduced expected future gross profits including additional costs associated with implementing the japan hedging strategy and the u.s .
variable annuity macro hedge program , as well as actual separate account returns below our aggregated estimated return .
the most significant contributors to the unlock benefit recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2010 were actual separate account returns being above our aggregated estimated return .
also included in the benefit are assumption updates related to benefits from withdrawals and lapses , offset by hedging , annuitization estimates on japan products , and long-term expected rate of return updates .
the most significant contributors to the unlock charge recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2009 were the results of actual separate account returns being significantly below our aggregated estimated return for the first quarter of 2009 , partially offset by actual returns being greater than our aggregated estimated return for the period from april 1 , 2009 to december 31 , 2009 .
[2] the most significant contributor to the adjustments was the effect of declining interest rates , resulting in unrealized gains on securities classified in aoci .
other includes a $ 34 decrease as a result of the disposition of dac from the sale of the hartford investment canadian canada in 2010 .
[3] for the year ended december 31 , 2010 the effect of adopting new accounting guidance for embedded credit derivatives resulted in a decrease to retained earnings and , as a result , a dac benefit .
in addition , an offsetting amount was recorded in unrealized losses as unrealized losses decreased upon adoption of the new accounting guidance .
for the year ended december 31 , 2009 the effect of adopting new accounting guidance for investments other- than- temporarily impaired resulted in an increase to retained earnings and , as a result , a dac charge .
in addition , an offsetting amount was recorded in unrealized losses as unrealized losses increased upon adoption of the new accounting guidance .
as of december 31 , 2011 , estimated future net amortization expense of present value of future profits for the succeeding five years is $ 39 , $ 58 , $ 24 , $ 23 and $ 22 in 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 and 2016 , respectively. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percent of the total debt associated with the 1250 million revolving credit agreement due june 2021

Pre-table text:
the components of external long-term debt were as follows : ( in millions ) 2017 2016 .

Table:
( in millions )	2017	2016
$ 400 million unsecured senior note due june 2020	$ 398.3	$ 397.6
$ 500 million unsecured senior note due june 2025	494.3	493.5
$ 1250 million revolving credit agreement due june 2021	615.0	540.0
total debt	1507.6	1431.1
less : current portion	2014	2014
total long-term debt	$ 1507.6	$ 1431.1

Post-table text:
senior notes payments during the next five years as of december 31 , 2017 are zero in 2018 through 2019 , $ 400 million in 2020 and zero in 2021 through 2022 .
in our debt agreements , there are normal and customary events of default which would permit the lenders to accelerate the debt if not cured within applicable grace periods , such as failure to pay principal or interest when due or a change in control of the company .
there were no events of default as of december 31 , 2017 .
9 .
financial instruments we do not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes .
we principally use financial instruments to reduce the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and commodities used as raw materials in our products .
the principal derivative financial instruments we enter into on a routine basis are foreign exchange contracts .
derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value .
the counterparties to derivative contracts are major financial institutions .
we are subject to credit risk on these contracts equal to the fair value of these instruments .
management currently believes that the risk of incurring material losses is unlikely and that the losses , if any , would be immaterial to the company .
raw materials used by the company are subject to price volatility caused by weather , supply conditions , geopolitical and economic variables , and other unpredictable external factors .
as a result , from time to time , we enter into commodity swaps to manage the price risk associated with forecasted purchases of materials used in our operations .
we account for these commodity derivatives as economic hedges or cash flow hedges .
changes in the fair value of economic hedges are recorded directly into current period earnings .
there were no material commodity swap contracts outstanding for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 .
we enter into foreign exchange contracts primarily to hedge forecasted sales and purchases denominated in select foreign currencies , thereby limiting currency risk that would otherwise result from changes in exchange rates .
the periods of the foreign exchange contracts correspond to the periods of the forecasted transactions , which generally do not exceed 12 to 15 months subsequent to the latest balance sheet date .
for derivative instruments that are designated as fair value hedges , the gain or loss on the derivative instrument , as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item , are recognized on the same line of the statement of income .
the effective portions of cash flow hedges are reported in other comprehensive income ( 201coci 201d ) and are recognized in the statement of income when the hedged item affects earnings .
the changes in fair value for net investment hedges are recognized in the statement of income when realized upon sale or upon complete or substantially complete liquidation of the investment in the foreign entity .
the ineffective portion of all hedges is recognized in current period earnings .
in addition , changes in the fair value of all economic hedge transactions are immediately recognized in current period earnings .
our primary foreign currency hedge contracts pertain to the canadian dollar , the british pound , and the mexican peso .
the gross u.s .
dollar equivalent notional amount of all foreign currency derivative hedges outstanding at december 31 , 2017 was $ 282.8 million , representing a net settlement liability of $ 4.8 million .
based on foreign exchange rates as of december 31 , 2017 , we estimate that $ 3.0 million of net foreign currency .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the ratio of the total flight attendants to pilots

Pre-table text:
future regulatory developments future regulatory developments and actions could affect operations and increase operating costs for the airline industry , including our airline subsidiaries .
see part i , item 1a .
risk factors - " if we are unable to obtain and maintain adequate facilities and infrastructure throughout our system and , at some airports , adequate slots , we may be unable to operate our existing flight schedule and to expand or change our route network in the future , which may have a material adverse impact on our operations ," "our business is subject to extensive government regulation , which may result in increases in our costs , disruptions to our operations , limits on our operating flexibility , reductions in the demand for air travel , and competitive disadvantages" and "we are subject to many forms of environmental regulation and may incur substantial costs as a result" for additional information .
employees and labor relations the airline business is labor intensive .
in 2013 , salaries , wages , and benefits were one of our largest expenses and represented approximately 22% ( 22 % ) of our operating expenses .
the table below presents our approximate number of active full-time equivalent employees as of december 31 , 2013 .
american us airways wholly-owned regional carriers total .

Table:
	american	us airways	wholly-owned regional carriers	total
pilots	7900	4100	3400	15400
flight attendants	15000	7700	2100	24800
maintenance personnel	11300	3100	2400	16800
fleet service personnel	7400	5500	1700	14600
passenger service personnel	10300	6200	6400	22900
administrative and other	8200	5500	2200	15900
total	60100	32100	18200	110400

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage of the total severance actions related to our aeronautics , space systems , and our is&gs business segments and corporate headquarters in 2011 related to the aeronautics

Pre-table text:
note 2 2013 restructuring charges 2013 actions during 2013 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 201 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 83 million , $ 37 million , and $ 81 million related to our information systems & global solutions ( is&gs ) , mission systems and training ( mst ) , and space systems business segments .
these charges reduced our net earnings by $ 130 million ( $ .40 per share ) and primarily related to a plan we committed to in november 2013 to close and consolidate certain facilities and reduce our total workforce by approximately 4000 positions within our is&gs , mst , and space systems business segments .
these charges also include $ 30 million related to certain severance actions at our is&gs business segment that occurred in the first quarter of 2013 , which were subsequently paid in 2013 .
the november 2013 plan resulted from a strategic review of these businesses 2019 facility capacity and future workload projections and is intended to better align our organization and cost structure and improve the affordability of our products and services given the continued decline in u.s .
government spending as well as the rapidly changing competitive and economic landscape .
upon separation , terminated employees will receive lump-sum severance payments primarily based on years of service .
during 2013 , we paid approximately $ 15 million in severance payments associated with these actions , with the remainder expected to be paid through the middle of 2015 .
in addition to the severance charges described above , we expect to incur accelerated and incremental costs ( e.g. , accelerated depreciation expense related to long-lived assets at the sites to be closed , relocation of equipment and other employee related costs ) of approximately $ 15 million , $ 50 million , and $ 135 million at our is&gs , mst , and space systems business segments related to the facility closures and consolidations .
the accelerated and incremental costs will be expensed as incurred in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations through their completion in 2015 .
we expect to recover a substantial amount of the restructuring charges through the pricing of our products and services to the u.s .
government and other customers in future periods , with the impact included in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations .
2012 and 2011 actions during 2012 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 48 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 25 million related to our aeronautics business segment and $ 23 million related to the reorganization of our former electronic systems business segment .
these charges reduced our net earnings by $ 31 million ( $ .09 per share ) and consisted of severance costs associated with the elimination of certain positions through either voluntary or involuntary actions .
these severance actions resulted from cost reduction initiatives to better align our organization with changing economic conditions .
upon separation , terminated employees received lump-sum severance payments primarily based on years of service , all of which were paid in 2013 .
during 2011 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 136 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 49 million , $ 48 million , and $ 39 million related to our aeronautics , space systems , and our is&gs business segments and corporate headquarters .
these charges reduced our net earnings by $ 88 million ( $ .26 per share ) and consisted of severance costs associated with the elimination of certain positions through either voluntary or involuntary actions .
these severance actions resulted from a strategic review of these businesses and our corporate headquarters and are intended to better align our organization and cost structure with changing economic conditions .
the workforce reductions at the business segments also reflected changes in program lifecycles , where several of our major programs were either transitioning out of development and into production or were ending .
upon separation , terminated employees received lump-sum severance payments based on years of service .
during 2011 , we made approximately half of the severance payments associated with these 2011 severance actions , and paid the remaining amounts in 2012 .
note 3 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2013	2012	2011
weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations	320.9	323.7	335.9
weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards	5.6	4.7	4.0
weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations	326.5	328.4	339.9

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
considering the year 2015 , what was the lowest return for the investment?

Pre-table text:
performance graph the annual changes for the period shown november 18 , 2013 ( when our ordinary shares began trading in the "when-issued" market ) to december 31 , 2016 in the graph on this page are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in allegion plc ordinary shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( "s&p 500" ) and the standard & poor's 400 capital goods index ( "s&p 400 capital goods" ) on november 18 , 2013 , and that all quarterly dividends were reinvested .
the total cumulative dollar returns shown on the graph represent the value that such investments would have had on december 31 , 2016 .
november 18 , 2013 december 31 , 2013 december 31 , 2014 december 31 , 2015 december 31 , 2016 .

Table:
	november 18 2013	december 31 2013	december 31 2014	december 31 2015	december 31 2016
allegion plc	100.00	91.16	115.11	137.71	134.67
s&p 500	100.00	103.44	117.59	119.22	133.48
s&p 400 capital goods	100.00	105.46	105.72	99.90	131.80

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percentage of the common stock repurchase among the total program of repurchases?

Pre-table text:
humana inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 15 .
stockholders 2019 equity dividends the following table provides details of dividend payments , excluding dividend equivalent rights , in 2015 , 2016 , and 2017 under our board approved quarterly cash dividend policy : payment amount per share amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
paymentdate	amountper share	totalamount ( in millions )
2015	$ 1.14	$ 170
2016	$ 1.16	$ 172
2017	$ 1.49	$ 216

Post-table text:
on november 2 , 2017 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.40 per share that was paid on january 26 , 2018 to stockholders of record on december 29 , 2017 , for an aggregate amount of $ 55 million .
declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change .
stock repurchases in september 2014 , our board of directors replaced a previous share repurchase authorization of up to $ 1 billion ( of which $ 816 million remained unused ) with an authorization for repurchases of up to $ 2 billion of our common shares exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , which expired on december 31 , 2016 .
under the share repurchase authorization , shares may have been purchased from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market , by block purchases , through plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , or in privately-negotiated transactions ( including pursuant to accelerated share repurchase agreements with investment banks ) , subject to certain regulatory restrictions on volume , pricing , and timing .
pursuant to the merger agreement , after july 2 , 2015 , we were prohibited from repurchasing any of our outstanding securities without the prior written consent of aetna , other than repurchases of shares of our common stock in connection with the exercise of outstanding stock options or the vesting or settlement of outstanding restricted stock awards .
accordingly , as announced on july 3 , 2015 , we suspended our share repurchase program .
on february 14 , 2017 , we and aetna agreed to mutually terminate the merger agreement .
we also announced that the board had approved a new authorization for share repurchases of up to $ 2.25 billion of our common stock exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , expiring on december 31 , 2017 .
on february 16 , 2017 , we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement , the february 2017 asr , with goldman , sachs & co .
llc , or goldman sachs , to repurchase $ 1.5 billion of our common stock as part of the $ 2.25 billion share repurchase program referred to above .
on february 22 , 2017 , we made a payment of $ 1.5 billion to goldman sachs from available cash on hand and received an initial delivery of 5.83 million shares of our common stock from goldman sachs based on the then current market price of humana common stock .
the payment to goldman sachs was recorded as a reduction to stockholders 2019 equity , consisting of a $ 1.2 billion increase in treasury stock , which reflected the value of the initial 5.83 million shares received upon initial settlement , and a $ 300 million decrease in capital in excess of par value , which reflected the value of stock held back by goldman sachs pending final settlement of the february 2017 asr .
upon settlement of the february 2017 asr on august 28 , 2017 , we received an additional 0.84 million shares as determined by the average daily volume weighted-average share price of our common stock during the term of the agreement of $ 224.81 , bringing the total shares received under this program to 6.67 million .
in addition , upon settlement we reclassified the $ 300 million value of stock initially held back by goldman sachs from capital in excess of par value to treasury stock .
subsequent to settlement of the february 2017 asr , we repurchased an additional 3.04 million shares in the open market , utilizing the remaining $ 750 million of the $ 2.25 billion authorization prior to expiration. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what portion of the total interest expense is related to unpaid taxes in 2007?

Pre-table text:
expire between 2019 and 2024 .
the company anticipates fully utilizing these net operating losses prior to expiration .
the company also has state net operating loss carryforwards resulting in a deferred tax asset of $ 5.3 million at december 31 , 2007 .
the company has a full valuation allowance against this amount at december 31 , 2007 .
the company has foreign net operating loss carryforwards resulting in deferred tax assets at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 of $ 45.6 million and $ 24.4 million , respectively .
the company has valuation allowances against these net operating losses at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 of $ 5.2 million and $ 6.0 million , respectively .
at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company had foreign tax credit carryovers of $ 12.4 million and $ 12.7 million , respectively , which expire between 2010 and 2025 .
as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company has a valuation allowance against $ 2.3 million of foreign tax credits that the company 2019s management believes it is more likely than not that it will not realize the benefit .
as of january 1 , 2005 , the irs selected the company to participate in the compliance assurance process ( cap ) which is a real-time audit for 2005 and future years .
the irs has completed its review for years 2002-2006 which resulted in an immaterial adjustment for tax year 2004 related to a temporary difference and no changes to any other tax year .
tax years 2007 and 2008 are currently under audit by the irs .
currently management believes the ultimate resolution of the 2007 and 2008 examinations will not result in a material adverse effect to the company 2019s financial position or results of operations .
the company provides for united states income taxes on earnings of foreign subsidiaries unless they are considered permanently reinvested outside the united states .
at december 31 , 2007 , the cumulative earnings on which united states taxes have not been provided for were $ 159.0 million .
if these earnings were repatriated to the united states , they would generate foreign tax credits that could reduce the federal tax liability associated with the foreign dividend .
the 2007 calendar year is the first year the company is required to adopt fasb interpretation no .
48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes ( 201cfin 48 201d ) .
as a result of the adoption , the company had no change to reserves for uncertain tax positions .
interest and penalties on accrued but unpaid taxes are classified in the consolidated financial statements as income tax expense .
the following table reconciles the gross amounts of unrecognized gross tax benefits at the beginning and end of the period ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
	gross amount
amounts of unrecognized tax benefits at january 1 2007	$ 11825
decreases as a result of tax positions taken in a prior period	-3749 ( 3749 )
increases as a result of tax positions taken in a prior period	15667
amount of unrecognized tax benefit at december 31 2007	$ 23743
amount of decreases due to lapse of the applicable statute of limitations	$ -3429 ( 3429 )
amount of decreases due to change of position	$ -320 ( 320 )

Post-table text:
included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2007 are potential benefits of $ 5.4 million that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate on income from continuing operations .
the total amount of interest expense recognized in the consolidated and combined statements of earnings for unpaid taxes is $ 1.4 million for the year ended december 31 , 2007 .
the total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the consolidated balance sheet is $ 8.4 million at december 31 , 2007 .
due to the expiration of various statutes of limitation in the next twelve months , an estimated $ 3 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits may be recognized during that twelve month period .
fidelity national information services , inc .
and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the net change in total statutory capital from 2007 to 2008?

Pre-table text:
table of contents the table below sets forth statutory surplus for the company 2019s insurance companies .
the statutory surplus amounts as of december 31 , 2007 in the table below are based on actual statutory filings with the applicable regulatory authorities .
the statutory surplus amounts as of december 31 , 2008 are estimates , as the respective 2008 statutory filings have not yet been the company has received approval from the connecticut insurance department regarding the use of two permitted practices in the statutory financial statements of its connecticut-domiciled life insurance subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2008 .
the first permitted practice relates to the statutory accounting for deferred income taxes .
specifically , this permitted practice modifies the accounting for deferred income taxes prescribed by the naic by increasing the realization period for deferred tax assets from one year to three years and increasing the asset recognition limit from 10% ( 10 % ) to 15% ( 15 % ) of adjusted statutory capital and surplus .
the benefits of this permitted practice may not be considered by the company when determining surplus available for dividends .
the second permitted practice relates to the statutory reserving requirements for variable annuities with guaranteed living benefit riders .
actuarial guidelines prescribed by the naic require a stand-alone asset adequacy analysis reflecting only benefits , expenses and charges that are associated with the riders for variable annuities with guaranteed living benefits .
the permitted practice allows for all benefits , expenses and charges associated with the variable annuity contract to be reflected in the stand- alone asset adequacy test .
these permitted practices resulted in an increase to life operations estimated statutory surplus of $ 987 as of december 31 , 2008 .
the effects of these permitted practices are included in the 2008 life operations surplus amount in the table above .
statutory capital the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity , as prepared using u.s .
gaap was $ 9.3 billion as of december 31 , 2008 .
the company 2019s estimated aggregate statutory capital and surplus , as prepared in accordance with the national association of insurance commissioners 2019 accounting practices and procedures manual ( 201cus stat 201d ) was $ 13.8 billion as of december 31 , 2008 .
significant differences between u.s .
gaap stockholders 2019 equity and aggregate statutory capital and surplus prepared in accordance with us stat include the following: .

Table:
	2008	2007
life operations	$ 6047	$ 5786
japan life operations	1718	1620
property & casualty operations	6012	8509
total	$ 13777	$ 15915

Post-table text:
2022 costs incurred by the company to acquire insurance policies are deferred under u.s .
gaap while those costs are expensed immediately under us stat .
2022 temporary differences between the book and tax basis of an asset or liability which are recorded as deferred tax assets are evaluated for recoverability under u.s .
gaap while those amounts deferred are subject to limitations under us stat .
2022 certain assumptions used in the determination of life benefit reserves are prescribed under us stat and are intended to be conservative , while the assumptions used under u.s .
gaap are generally the company 2019s best estimates .
in addition , the methodologies used for determining life reserve amounts are different between us stat and u.s .
gaap .
annuity reserving and cash-flow testing for death and living benefit reserves under us stat are generally addressed by the commissioners 2019 annuity reserving valuation methodology and the related actuarial guidelines .
under these actuarial guidelines , in general , future cash flows associated with the variable annuity business are included in these methodologies with estimates of future fee revenues , claim payments , expenses , reinsurance impacts and hedging impacts .
at december 31 , 2008 , in determining the cash-flow impacts related to future hedging , assumptions were made in the scenarios that generate reserve requirements , about the potential future decreases in the hedge benefits and increases in hedge costs which resulted in increased reserve requirements .
reserves for death and living benefits under u.s .
gaap are either considered embedded derivatives and recorded at fair value or they may be considered sop 03-1 reserves .
2022 the difference between the amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity and other investments , net of tax , is recorded as an increase or decrease to the carrying value of the related asset and to equity under u.s .
gaap , while us stat only records certain securities at fair value , such as equity securities and certain lower rated bonds required by the naic to be recorded at the lower of amortized cost or fair value .
in the case of the company 2019s market value adjusted ( mva ) fixed annuity products , invested assets are marked to fair value ( including the impact of credit spreads ) and liabilities are marked to fair value ( but generally actual credit spreads are not fully reflected ) for statutory purposes only .
2022 us stat for life insurance companies establishes a formula reserve for realized and unrealized losses due to default and equity risks associated with certain invested assets ( the asset valuation reserve ) , while u.s .
gaap does not .
also , for those realized gains and losses caused by changes in interest rates , us stat for life insurance companies defers and amortizes the gains and losses , caused by changes in interest rates , into income over the original life to maturity of the asset sold ( the interest maintenance reserve ) while u.s .
gaap does not .
2022 goodwill arising from the acquisition of a business is tested for recoverability on an annual basis ( or more frequently , as necessary ) for u.s .
gaap , while under us stat goodwill is amortized over a period not to exceed 10 years and the .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}