[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the cost per car for the buyout of locomotives in 2012?

Pre-table text:
we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities .
cash flows millions 2014 2013 2012 .

Table:
cash flowsmillions	2014	2013	2012
cash provided by operating activities	$ 7385	$ 6823	$ 6161
cash used in investing activities	-4249 ( 4249 )	-3405 ( 3405 )	-3633 ( 3633 )
cash used in financing activities	-2982 ( 2982 )	-3049 ( 3049 )	-2682 ( 2682 )
net change in cash and cashequivalents	$ 154	$ 369	$ -154 ( 154 )

Post-table text:
operating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments .
2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation ( discussed below ) .
higher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012 .
in addition , we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations , which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012 .
lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as discussed below ) partially offset the increases .
federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 .
as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years .
congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014 .
investing activities higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013 .
significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects .
capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions .
lower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012 .
included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
as part of the employee stock purchase plan what was the percent of the decline in issuance under this plan from 2016 to 2017

Pre-table text:
republic services , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) employee stock purchase plan republic employees are eligible to participate in an employee stock purchase plan .
the plan allows participants to purchase our common stock for 95% ( 95 % ) of its quoted market price on the last day of each calendar quarter .
for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , issuances under this plan totaled 113941 shares , 130085 shares and 141055 shares , respectively .
as of december 31 , 2017 , shares reserved for issuance to employees under this plan totaled 0.4 million and republic held employee contributions of approximately $ 1.8 million for the purchase of common stock .
12 .
stock repurchases and dividends stock repurchases stock repurchase activity during the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 follows ( in millions except per share amounts ) : .

Table:
	2017	2016
number of shares repurchased	9.6	8.4
amount paid	$ 610.7	$ 403.8
weighted average cost per share	$ 63.84	$ 48.56

Post-table text:
as of december 31 , 2017 , there were 0.5 million repurchased shares pending settlement and $ 33.8 million was unpaid and included within other accrued liabilities .
in october 2017 , our board of directors added $ 2.0 billion to the existing share repurchase authorization that now extends through december 31 , 2020 .
before this , $ 98.4 million remained under a prior authorization .
share repurchases under the program may be made through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable federal securities laws .
while the board of directors has approved the program , the timing of any purchases , the prices and the number of shares of common stock to be purchased will be determined by our management , at its discretion , and will depend upon market conditions and other factors .
the share repurchase program may be extended , suspended or discontinued at any time .
as of december 31 , 2017 , the remaining authorized purchase capacity under our october 2017 repurchase program was $ 1.8 billion .
in december 2015 , our board of directors changed the status of 71272964 treasury shares to authorized and unissued .
in doing so , the number of our issued shares was reduced by the stated amount .
our accounting policy is to deduct the par value from common stock and to reflect the excess of cost over par value as a deduction from additional paid-in capital .
the change in unissued shares resulted in a reduction of $ 2295.3 million in treasury stock , $ 0.6 million in common stock , and $ 2294.7 million in additional paid-in capital .
there was no effect on our total stockholders 2019 equity position as a result of the change .
dividends in october 2017 , our board of directors approved a quarterly dividend of $ 0.345 per share .
cash dividends declared were $ 446.3 million , $ 423.8 million and $ 404.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .
as of december 31 , 2017 , we recorded a quarterly dividend payable of $ 114.4 million to shareholders of record at the close of business on january 2 , 2018 .
13 .
earnings per share basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to republic services , inc .
by the weighted average number of common shares ( including vested but unissued rsus ) outstanding during the .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage of carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet trading assets from 2007 to 2008?

Pre-table text:
the notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $ 1.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .
the amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .
these items have been classified appropriately in trading account assets or trading account liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet .
changes in fair value of these items are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
other items for which the fair-value option was selected in accordance with sfas 159 the company has elected the fair-value option for the following eligible items , which did not affect opening retained earnings : 2022 certain credit products ; 2022 certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity-method investments ; 2022 certain structured liabilities ; 2022 certain non-structured liabilities ; and 2022 certain mortgage loans certain credit products citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain originated and purchased loans , including certain unfunded loan products , such as guarantees and letters of credit , executed by citigroup 2019s trading businesses .
none of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment .
significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term , or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party .
citigroup has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications .
fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the company , including where those management objectives would not be met .
the following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value: .

Table:
in millions of dollars	2008 trading assets	2008 loans	2008 trading assets	loans
carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet	$ 16254	$ 2315	$ 26020	$ 3038
aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value	$ 6501	$ 3	$ 899	$ -5 ( 5 )
balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due	$ 77	$ 1113	$ 186	$ 1292
aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue	$ 190	$ -4 ( 4 )	$ 68	$ 2014

Post-table text:
in millions of dollars trading assets loans trading assets loans carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 16254 $ 2315 $ 26020 $ 3038 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value $ 6501 $ 3 $ 899 $ ( 5 ) balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 77 $ 1113 $ 186 $ 1292 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 190 $ ( 4 ) $ 68 $ 2014 in addition to the amounts reported above , $ 72 million and $ 141 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-value accounting were outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively .
changes in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loans depending on their balance sheet classifications .
the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 38 million and $ 188 million , respectively .
certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation .
the company has elected the fair-value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in our investment companies , which are reported at fair value .
the fair-value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments .
as required by sfas 159 , all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value .
these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .
citigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for under the equity method .
the company elected fair-value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity .
since the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value , the impact of applying the equity method to citigroup 2019s investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-value accounting .
thus , this fair-value election had no impact on opening retained earnings .
these investments are classified as other assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .
changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
certain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) .
the company elected the fair- value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis .
these positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form .
for those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 277 million as of december 31 , 2008 and $ 7 million as of december 31 , 2007 .
the change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement .
certain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the difference in dollars of the high low sale price for the common stock in the third quarter of 2002?

Pre-table text:
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information .
the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated .
price range of common stock .

Table:
2002 first quarter	high $ 17.84	low $ 4.11	2001 first quarter	high $ 60.15	low $ 41.30
second quarter	9.17	3.55	second quarter	52.25	39.95
third quarter	4.61	1.56	third quarter	44.50	12.00
fourth quarter	3.57	0.95	fourth quarter	17.80	11.60

Post-table text:
holders .
as of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share .
dividends .
under the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends .
in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met .
the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries .
securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans .
see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
for the five years ended 12/31/2006 what is the performance difference of the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . and the s&p 500 index?

Pre-table text:
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing .
the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .
the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .
comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

Table:
	12/31/01	12/31/02	12/31/03	12/31/04	12/31/05	12/31/06
united parcel service inc .	$ 100.00	$ 117.19	$ 140.49	$ 163.54	$ 146.35	$ 148.92
s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 77.90	$ 100.24	$ 111.15	$ 116.61	$ 135.02
dow jones transportation average	$ 100.00	$ 88.52	$ 116.70	$ 149.06	$ 166.42	$ 182.76

Post-table text:
securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .
these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what on the net interest reduction of 13 million or 23% ( 23 % ) compared to 2015 what was the interest amount in 2016 in millions

Pre-table text:
increased investment in programming to support subscriber growth , higher offer costs and continued investment in presto , partially offset by lower depreciation expense resulting from foxtel 2019s reassessment of the useful lives of cable and satellite installations .
net income decreased as a result of the lower operating income noted above , partially offset by lower income tax expense .
( b ) other equity affiliates , net for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 includes losses primarily from the company 2019s interests in draftstars and elara technologies , which owns proptiger .
interest , net 2014interest , net for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 decreased $ 13 million , or 23% ( 23 % ) , as compared to fiscal 2015 , primarily due to the negative impact of foreign currency fluctuations and interest expense associated with the rea facility .
( see note 9 to the consolidated financial statements ) .
other , net 2014 for the fiscal years ended june 30 .

Table:
( in millions )	for the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2016	for the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2015
gain on iproperty transaction ( a )	$ 29	$ 2014
impairment of marketable securities and cost method investments ( b )	-21 ( 21 )	-5 ( 5 )
gain on sale of marketable securities ( c )	2014	29
dividends received from cost method investments	2014	25
gain on sale of cost method investments	2014	15
other	10	11
total other net	$ 18	$ 75

Post-table text:
( a ) rea group recognized a gain of $ 29 million resulting from the revaluation of its previously held equity interest in iproperty during the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 .
( see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements ) .
( b ) the company recorded write-offs and impairments of certain investments in the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2016 and 2015 .
these write-offs and impairments were taken either as a result of the deteriorating financial position of the investee or due to an other-than-temporary impairment resulting from sustained losses and limited prospects for recovery .
( see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements. ) ( c ) in august 2014 , rea group completed the sale of a minority interest held in marketable securities for total cash consideration of $ 104 million .
as a result of the sale , rea group recognized a pre-tax gain of $ 29 million , which was reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income and included in other , net in the statement of operations .
income tax benefit ( expense ) 2014the company 2019s income tax benefit and effective tax rate for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 were $ 54 million and ( 30% ( 30 % ) ) , respectively , as compared to an income tax expense and effective tax rate of $ 185 million and 34% ( 34 % ) , respectively , for fiscal 2015 .
for the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2016 the company recorded a tax benefit of $ 54 million on pre-tax income of $ 181 million resulting in an effective tax rate that was lower than the u.s .
statutory tax .
the lower tax rate was primarily due to a tax benefit of approximately $ 106 million related to the release of previously established valuation allowances related to certain u.s .
federal net operating losses and state deferred tax assets .
this benefit was recognized in conjunction with management 2019s plan to dispose of the company 2019s digital education business in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 , as the company now expects to generate sufficient u.s .
taxable income to utilize these deferred tax assets prior to expiration .
in addition , the effective tax rate was also impacted by the $ 29 million non-taxable gain resulting from the revaluation of rea group 2019s previously held equity interest in iproperty .
for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2015 , the company 2019s effective tax rate was lower than the u.s .
statutory tax rate primarily due to the impact from foreign operations which are subject to lower tax rates , partially offset by the impact of nondeductible items and changes in our accrued liabilities for uncertain tax positions .
( see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the total return of the kbw bank index over the above refernced five year period?

Pre-table text:
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 63 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .
( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .
the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s .
equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .
the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .
and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .
the s&p financial index is an index of 85 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .
the firm is a component of all three industry indices .
the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .
the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .
december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 .

Table:
december 31 ( in dollars )	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014
jpmorgan chase	$ 100.00	$ 102.30	$ 81.87	$ 111.49	$ 152.42	$ 167.48
kbw bank index	100.00	123.36	94.75	125.91	173.45	189.69
s&p financial index	100.00	112.13	93.00	119.73	162.34	186.98
s&p 500 index	100.00	115.06	117.48	136.27	180.39	205.07

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
considering the years 2014-2016 , what is the highest interest expense observed?

Pre-table text:
other income ( expense ) , net items recorded to other income ( expense ) , net arise from transactions and events not directly related to our principal income earning activities .
the detail of other income ( expense ) , net is presented in note 24 , supplemental information , to the consolidated financial statements .
2016 vs .
2015 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 58.1 increased $ 10.8 primarily due to lower foreign exchange losses , favorable contract settlements , and receipt of a government subsidy .
the prior year included a gain of $ 33.6 ( $ 28.3 after-tax , or $ .13 per share ) resulting from the sale of two parcels of land .
no other individual items were significant in comparison to the prior year .
2015 vs .
2014 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 47.3 decreased $ 5.5 and included a gain of $ 33.6 ( $ 28.3 after-tax , or $ .13 per share ) resulting from the sale of two parcels of land .
the gain was partially offset by unfavorable foreign exchange impacts and lower gains on other sales of assets and emissions credits .
no other individual items were significant in comparison to fiscal year 2014 .
interest expense .

Table:
	2016	2015	2014
interest incurred	$ 148.4	$ 152.6	$ 158.1
less : capitalized interest	32.9	49.1	33.0
interest expense	$ 115.5	$ 103.5	$ 125.1

Post-table text:
2016 vs .
2015 interest incurred decreased $ 4.2 .
the decrease primarily resulted from a stronger u.s .
dollar on the translation of foreign currency interest of $ 6 , partially offset by a higher average debt balance of $ 2 .
the change in capitalized interest was driven by a decrease in the carrying value of projects under construction , primarily as a result of our exit from the energy-from-waste business .
2015 vs .
2014 interest incurred decreased $ 5.5 .
the decrease was driven by the impact of a stronger u.s .
dollar on the translation of foreign currency interest of $ 12 , partially offset by a higher average debt balance of $ 7 .
the change in capitalized interest was driven by a higher carrying value in construction in progress .
loss on extinguishment of debt on 30 september 2016 , in anticipation of the versum spin-off , versum issued $ 425.0 of notes to air products , who then exchanged these notes with certain financial institutions for $ 418.3 of air products 2019 outstanding commercial paper .
the exchange resulted in a loss of $ 6.9 ( $ 4.3 after-tax , or $ .02 per share ) .
in september 2015 , we made a payment of $ 146.6 to redeem 3000000 unidades de fomento ( 201cuf 201d ) series e 6.30% ( 6.30 % ) bonds due 22 january 2030 that had a carrying value of $ 130.0 and resulted in a net loss of $ 16.6 ( $ 14.2 after-tax , or $ .07 per share ) .
effective tax rate the effective tax rate equals the income tax provision divided by income from continuing operations before taxes .
refer to note 23 , income taxes , to the consolidated financial statements for details on factors affecting the effective tax rate .
2016 vs .
2015 on a gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 27.5% ( 27.5 % ) and 24.0% ( 24.0 % ) in 2016 and 2015 , respectively .
the change included a 240 bp impact from tax costs associated with business separation , primarily resulting from a dividend declared in 2016 to repatriate cash from a foreign subsidiary , as discussed above in 201cbusiness separation costs . 201d the remaining 110 bp change was primarily due to the increase in mix of income in jurisdictions with a higher effective tax rate and the impact of business separation costs for which a tax benefit was not available .
on a non- gaap basis , the effective tax rate increased from 24.2% ( 24.2 % ) in 2015 to 24.8% ( 24.8 % ) in 2016 , primarily due to the increase in and mix of income in jurisdictions with a higher effective tax rate. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percentage change in the amount of guarantees from parent company from 2007 to 2008?

Pre-table text:
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have certain contingent obligations under guarantees of certain of our subsidiaries ( 201cparent company guarantees 201d ) relating principally to credit facilities , guarantees of certain media payables and operating leases .
the amount of such parent company guarantees was $ 255.7 and $ 327.1 as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee .
as of december 31 , 2008 , there are no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees .
contingent acquisition obligations we have structured certain acquisitions with additional contingent purchase price obligations in order to reduce the potential risk associated with negative future performance of the acquired entity .
in addition , we have entered into agreements that may require us to purchase additional equity interests in certain consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries .
the amounts relating to these transactions are based on estimates of the future financial performance of the acquired entity , the timing of the exercise of these rights , changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other factors .
we have not recorded a liability for these items since the definitive amounts payable are not determinable or distributable .
when the contingent acquisition obligations have been met and consideration is determinable and distributable , we record the fair value of this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity .
however , certain acquisitions contain deferred payments that are fixed and determinable on the acquisition date .
in such cases , we record a liability for the payment and record this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity on the acquisition date .
if deferred payments and purchases of additional interests after the effective date of purchase are contingent upon the future employment of the former owners then we recognize these payments as compensation expense .
compensation expense is determined based on the terms and conditions of the respective acquisition agreements and employment terms of the former owners of the acquired businesses .
this future expense will not be allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired and is amortized over the required employment terms of the former owners .
the following table details the estimated liability with respect to our contingent acquisition obligations and the estimated amount that would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date .
we have certain put options that are exercisable at the discretion of the minority owners as of december 31 , 2008 .
as such , these estimated acquisition payments of $ 5.5 have been included within the total payments expected to be made in 2009 in the table below and , if not made in 2009 , will continue to carry forward into 2010 or beyond until they are exercised or expire .
all payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revisions as the earn-out periods progress .
as of december 31 , 2008 , our estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash are as follows: .

Table:
	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	thereafter	total
deferred acquisition payments	$ 67.5	$ 32.1	$ 30.1	$ 4.5	$ 5.7	$ 2014	$ 139.9
put and call options with affiliates1	11.8	34.3	73.6	70.8	70.2	2.2	262.9
total contingent acquisition payments	79.3	66.4	103.7	75.3	75.9	2.2	402.8
less cash compensation expense included above	2.6	1.3	0.7	0.7	0.3	2014	5.6
total	$ 76.7	$ 65.1	$ 103.0	$ 74.6	$ 75.6	$ 2.2	$ 397.2

Post-table text:
1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both put and call options with similar terms and conditions .
in such instances , we have included the related estimated contingent acquisition obligation in the period when the earliest related option is exercisable .
as a result of revisions made during 2008 to eitf topic no .
d-98 , classification and measurement of redeemable securities ( 201ceitf d-98 201d ) .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percentage change in amortization expense from from 2007 to 2008?

Pre-table text:
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a description of the company 2019s reporting units and the results of the related transitional impairment testing are as follows : verestar 2014verestar was a single segment and reporting unit until december 2002 , when the company committed to a plan to dispose of verestar .
the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 189.3 million relating to the impairment of goodwill in this reporting unit .
the fair value of this reporting unit was determined based on an independent third party appraisal .
network development services 2014as of january 1 , 2002 , the reporting units in the company 2019s network development services segment included kline , specialty constructors , galaxy , mts components and flash technologies .
the company estimated the fair value of these reporting units utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information as to the value of each reporting unit on january 1 , 2002 .
the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 387.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 related to the impairment of goodwill within these reporting units .
such charge included full impairment for all of the goodwill within the reporting units except kline , for which only a partial impairment was recorded .
as discussed in note 2 , the assets of all of these reporting units were sold as of december 31 , 2003 , except for those of kline and our tower construction services unit , which were sold in march and november 2004 , respectively .
rental and management 2014the company obtained an independent third party appraisal of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill and determined that goodwill was not impaired .
the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
	2004	2003
acquired customer base and network location intangibles	$ 1369607	$ 1299521
deferred financing costs	89736	111484
acquired licenses and other intangibles	43404	43125
total	1502747	1454130
less accumulated amortization	-517444 ( 517444 )	-434381 ( 434381 )
other intangible assets net	$ 985303	$ 1019749

Post-table text:
the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years .
amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 aggregated approximately $ 97.8 million and $ 94.6 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) .
the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 97.8 million , $ 95.9 million , $ 92.0 million , $ 90.5 million and $ 88.8 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 and 2009 , respectively .
5 .
notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a .
de c.v .
( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million .
the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) .
the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) .
as of december 31 , 2004 , and 2003 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .
the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
as of december 31 , 2015 , what was the maximum premium on the dp&l preferred stock?

Pre-table text:
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following table summarizes the company's redeemable stock of subsidiaries balances as of the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

Table:
december 31,	2016	2015
ipalco common stock	$ 618	$ 460
colon quotas ( 1 )	100	2014
ipl preferred stock	60	60
other common stock	4	2014
dpl preferred stock	2014	18
total redeemable stock of subsidiaries	$ 782	$ 538

Post-table text:
_____________________________ ( 1 ) characteristics of quotas are similar to common stock .
colon 2014 during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , our partner in colon increased their ownership from 25% ( 25 % ) to 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) and made capital contributions of $ 106 million .
any subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to our partner , or measure the investment at fair value , will be classified as temporary equity each reporting period as it is probable that the shares will become redeemable .
ipl 2014 ipl had $ 60 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , which represented five series of preferred stock .
the total annual dividend requirements were approximately $ 3 million at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 .
certain series of the preferred stock were redeemable solely at the option of the issuer at prices between $ 100 and $ 118 per share .
holders of the preferred stock are entitled to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors if ipl has not paid dividends to its preferred stockholders for four consecutive quarters .
based on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares is considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock is considered temporary equity .
dpl 2014 dpl had $ 18 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , which represented three series of preferred stock issued by dp&l , a wholly-owned subsidiary of dpl .
the dp&l preferred stock was redeemable at dp&l's option as determined by its board of directors at per-share redemption prices between $ 101 and $ 103 per share , plus cumulative preferred dividends .
in addition , dp&l's amended articles of incorporation contained provisions that permitted preferred stockholders to elect members of the dp&l board of directors in the event that cumulative dividends on the preferred stock are in arrears in an aggregate amount equivalent to at least four full quarterly dividends .
based on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect members of dp&l's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares was considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock was considered temporary equity .
in september 2016 , it became probable that the preferred shares would become redeemable .
as such , the company recorded an adjustment of $ 5 million to retained earnings to adjust the preferred shares to their redemption value of $ 23 million .
in october 2016 , dp&l redeemed all of its preferred shares .
upon redemption , the preferred shares were no longer outstanding and all rights of the holders thereof as shareholders of dp&l ceased to exist .
ipalco 2014 in february 2015 , cdpq purchased 15% ( 15 % ) of aes us investment , inc. , a wholly-owned subsidiary that owns 100% ( 100 % ) of ipalco , for $ 247 million , with an option to invest an additional $ 349 million in ipalco through 2016 in exchange for a 17.65% ( 17.65 % ) equity stake .
in april 2015 , cdpq invested an additional $ 214 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 24.90% ( 24.90 % ) .
as a result of these transactions , $ 84 million in taxes and transaction costs were recognized as a net decrease to equity .
the company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of 377 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .
no gain or loss was recognized in net income as the transaction was not considered to be a sale of in-substance real estate .
in march 2016 , cdpq exercised its remaining option by investing $ 134 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 30% ( 30 % ) .
the company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of $ 84 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .
in june 2016 , cdpq contributed an additional $ 24 million to ipalco , with no impact to the ownership structure of the investment .
any subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to cdpq will be classified as nci within permanent equity as it is not probable that the shares will become redeemable. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the sum of the annual long-term debt maturities due in five years

Pre-table text:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .
( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .
( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .
the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .
entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term debt .
( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations .
( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 109 million at entergy louisiana and $ 34 million at system energy , long-term doe obligations of $ 181 million at entergy arkansas , and the note payable to nypa of $ 35 million at entergy , and includes debt due within one year .
fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .
the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Table:
	amount ( in thousands )
2016	$ 204079
2017	$ 766451
2018	$ 822690
2019	$ 768588
2020	$ 1631181

Post-table text:
in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .
entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .
these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .
in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .
this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .
as part of the purchase agreement with nypa , entergy recorded a liability representing the net present value of the payments entergy would be liable to nypa for each year that the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants would run beyond their respective original nrc license expiration date .
with the planned shutdown of fitzpatrick at the end of its current fuel cycle , entergy reduced this liability by $ 26.4 million in 2015 pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement .
under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .
entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2017 .
entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2018 .
entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2016 .
capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to: .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
how much more , in percent , was spent on october shares than november shares?

Pre-table text:
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008 : number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs .

Table:
	total number of shares purchased	average price paid per share2	total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs	maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
october 1-31	29704	$ 5.99	2014	2014
november 1-30	4468	$ 3.24	2014	2014
december 1-31	12850	$ 3.98	2014	2014
total1	47022	$ 5.18	2014	2014

Post-table text:
total1 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) .
2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in millions , what was the change in the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads on financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected between december 2017 and december 2016?

Pre-table text:
the goldman sachs group , inc .
and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis sensitivity measures certain portfolios and individual positions are not included in var because var is not the most appropriate risk measure .
other sensitivity measures we use to analyze market risk are described below .
10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity measures .
the table below presents market risk for positions , accounted for at fair value , that are not included in var by asset category. .

Table:
$ in millions	as of december 2017	as of december 2016	as of december 2015
equity	$ 2096	$ 2085	$ 2157
debt	1606	1702	1479
total	$ 3702	$ 3787	$ 3636

Post-table text:
in the table above : 2030 the market risk of these positions is determined by estimating the potential reduction in net revenues of a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in the value of these positions .
2030 equity positions relate to private and restricted public equity securities , including interests in funds that invest in corporate equities and real estate and interests in hedge funds .
2030 debt positions include interests in funds that invest in corporate mezzanine and senior debt instruments , loans backed by commercial and residential real estate , corporate bank loans and other corporate debt , including acquired portfolios of distressed loans .
2030 equity and debt funded positions are included in our consolidated statements of financial condition in financial instruments owned .
see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about cash instruments .
2030 these measures do not reflect the diversification effect across asset categories or across other market risk measures .
credit spread sensitivity on derivatives and financial liabilities .
var excludes the impact of changes in counterparty and our own credit spreads on derivatives , as well as changes in our own credit spreads ( debt valuation adjustment ) on financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected .
the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads ( counterparty and our own ) on derivatives was a gain of $ 3 million and $ 2 million ( including hedges ) as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively .
in addition , the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in our own credit spreads on financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected was a gain of $ 35 million and $ 25 million as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively .
however , the actual net impact of a change in our own credit spreads is also affected by the liquidity , duration and convexity ( as the sensitivity is not linear to changes in yields ) of those financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected , as well as the relative performance of any hedges undertaken .
interest rate sensitivity .
loans receivable as of december 2017 and december 2016 were $ 65.93 billion and $ 49.67 billion , respectively , substantially all of which had floating interest rates .
as of december 2017 and december 2016 , the estimated sensitivity to a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on such loans was $ 527 million and $ 405 million , respectively , of additional interest income over a twelve-month period , which does not take into account the potential impact of an increase in costs to fund such loans .
see note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about loans receivable .
other market risk considerations as of december 2017 and december 2016 , we had commitments and held loans for which we have obtained credit loss protection from sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc .
see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about such lending commitments .
in addition , we make investments in securities that are accounted for as available-for-sale and included in financial instruments owned in the consolidated statements of financial condition .
see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information .
we also make investments accounted for under the equity method and we also make direct investments in real estate , both of which are included in other assets .
direct investments in real estate are accounted for at cost less accumulated depreciation .
see note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about other assets .
goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 93 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percent change in fair value between 2010 and 2011?

Pre-table text:
impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: .

Table:
( in millions )	2011	2010
fair value	$ 99832	$ 81881
amortized cost	100013	82329
net unrealized loss pre-tax	$ -181 ( 181 )	$ -448 ( 448 )
net unrealized loss after-tax	$ -113 ( 113 )	$ -270 ( 270 )

Post-table text:
the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .
these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci .
refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 .
the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization .
we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .
to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .
the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security .
our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors .
such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .
to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .
given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s .
housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance .
as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices .
generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears .
as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current .
overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough .
the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate .
in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above .
the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations .
our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses .
ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security .
in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s .
residential mortgage-backed portfolio .
we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above .
this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults .
to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated .
excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the increase observed in the first quarter dividend percentage concerning the total value , during 2018 and 2019?

Pre-table text:
part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters , and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the symbol "apd." as of 31 october 2019 , there were 5166 record holders of our common stock .
cash dividends on the company 2019s common stock are paid quarterly .
it is our expectation that we will continue to pay cash dividends in the future at comparable or increased levels .
the board of directors determines whether to declare dividends and the timing and amount based on financial condition and other factors it deems relevant .
dividend information for each quarter of fiscal years 2019 and 2018 is summarized below: .

Table:
	2019	2018
first quarter	$ 1.10	$ .95
second quarter	1.16	1.10
third quarter	1.16	1.10
fourth quarter	1.16	1.10
total	$ 4.58	$ 4.25

Post-table text:
purchases of equity securities by the issuer on 15 september 2011 , the board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 1.0 billion of our outstanding common stock .
this program does not have a stated expiration date .
we repurchase shares pursuant to rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , through repurchase agreements established with one or more brokers .
there were no purchases of stock during fiscal year 2019 .
at 30 september 2019 , $ 485.3 million in share repurchase authorization remained .
additional purchases will be completed at the company 2019s discretion while maintaining sufficient funds for investing in its businesses and growth opportunities. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what were average net sales for mfc from 2013 to 2015 in millions?

Pre-table text:
backlog backlog decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to sales being recognized on several multi-year programs ( such as hmsc , nisc iii , ciog and nsf asc ) related to prior year awards and a limited number of large new business awards .
backlog decreased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower customer funding levels and declining activities on direct warfighter support programs impacted by defense budget reductions .
trends we expect is&gs 2019 2016 net sales to decline in the high-single digit percentage range as compared to 2015 , primarily driven by key loss contracts in an increasingly competitive environment , along with volume contraction on the segment 2019s major contracts .
operating profit is expected to decline at a higher percentage range in 2016 , as compared to net sales percentage declines , driven by higher margin program losses and re-compete programs awarded at lower margins .
accordingly , 2016 margins are expected to be lower than 2015 results .
missiles and fire control our mfc business segment provides air and missile defense systems ; tactical missiles and air-to-ground precision strike weapon systems ; logistics ; fire control systems ; mission operations support , readiness , engineering support and integration services ; manned and unmanned ground vehicles ; and energy management solutions .
mfc 2019s major programs include pac-3 , thaad , multiple launch rocket system , hellfire , jassm , javelin , apache , sniper ae , low altitude navigation and targeting infrared for night ( lantirn ae ) and sof clss .
mfc 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2015	2014	2013
net sales	$ 6770	$ 7092	$ 6795
operating profit	1282	1344	1379
operating margins	18.9% ( 18.9 % )	19.0% ( 19.0 % )	20.3% ( 20.3 % )
backlog at year-end	$ 15500	$ 13300	$ 14300

Post-table text:
2015 compared to 2014 mfc 2019s net sales in 2015 decreased $ 322 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to the same period in 2014 .
the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 345 million for air and missile defense programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily pac-3 ) and lower volume ( primarily thaad ) ; and approximately $ 85 million for tactical missile programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily guided multiple launch rocket system ( gmlrs ) ) and joint air-to-surface standoff missile , partially offset by increased deliveries for hellfire .
these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 55 million for energy solutions programs due to increased volume .
mfc 2019s operating profit in 2015 decreased $ 62 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2014 .
the decrease was attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 100 million for fire control programs due primarily to lower risk retirements ( primarily lantirn and sniper ) ; and approximately $ 65 million for tactical missile programs due to lower risk retirements ( primarily hellfire and gmlrs ) and fewer deliveries .
these decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 75 million for air and missile defense programs due to increased risk retirements ( primarily thaad ) .
adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 60 million lower in 2015 compared to 2014 .
2014 compared to 2013 mfc 2019s net sales increased $ 297 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .
the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 180 million for air and missile defense programs primarily due to increased volume for thaad ; about $ 115 million for fire control programs due to increased deliveries ( including apache ) ; and about $ 125 million for various other programs due to increased volume .
these increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 115 million for tactical missile programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily high mobility artillery rocket system and army tactical missile system ) .
mfc 2019s operating profit decreased $ 35 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .
the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 20 million for tactical missile programs due to net warranty reserve adjustments for various programs ( including jassm and gmlrs ) and fewer deliveries ; and approximately $ 45 million for various other programs due to lower risk retirements .
the decreases were offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 20 million for air and missile defense programs due to increased volume ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the change in wti crude oil ( dollars per barrel ) between july 3 and december 19 , 2008?

Pre-table text:
crude oil , and political unrest in the middle east and elsewhere .
later in 2008 , crude oil prices dropped more rapidly than they had climbed as the u.s .
dollar rebounded and other countries entered recessions which decreased demand .
during 2008 , the average spot price per barrel for wti was $ 99.75 , up from an average of $ 72.41 in 2007 , but ended the year at $ 44.60 .
the average spot price per barrel for brent was $ 97.26 in 2008 , up from an average of $ 72.39 in 2007 , but ended the year at $ 36.55 .
the differential between wti and brent average prices widened to $ 2.49 in 2008 from $ 0.02 in 2007 .
our domestic crude oil production is on average heavier and higher in sulfur content than light sweet wti .
heavier and higher sulfur crude oil ( commonly referred to as heavy sour crude oil ) sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil .
our international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the brent crude oil benchmark .
natural gas prices on average were higher in 2008 than in 2007 .
a significant portion of our u.s .
lower 48 states natural gas production is sold at bid-week prices or first-of-month indices relative to our specific producing areas .
the average henry hub first-of-month price index was $ 2.18 per thousand cubic feet ( 201cmcf 201d ) higher in 2008 than the 2007 average .
natural gas sales in alaska are subject to term contracts .
our other major natural gas-producing regions are europe and equatorial guinea , where large portions of our natural gas sales are subject to term contracts , making realized prices in these areas less volatile .
as we sell larger quantities of natural gas from these regions , to the extent that these fixed prices are lower than prevailing prices , our reported average natural gas prices realizations may decrease .
e&p segment income during 2008 was up 57 percent from 2007 , with revenue increases tied to these increases in average commodity prices accounting for almost half of the income improvement .
liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas sales volumes were also higher in 2008 than 2007 .
oil sands mining oil sands mining segment revenues correlate with prevailing market prices for the various qualities of synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil we produce .
roughly two-thirds of the normal output mix will track movements in wti and one-third will track movements in the canadian heavy sour crude oil marker , primarily western canadian select .
output mix can be impacted by operational problems or planned unit outages at the mine or upgrader .
during 2008 , our average realized price for synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil was $ 91.90 per barrel , up from 2007 , but ended the year at $ 24.97 per barrel impacted by a heavier yield in december and a seasonal decrease in the value of our heavy output .
the operating cost structure of the oil sands mining operations is predominantly fixed , and therefore many of the costs incurred in times of full operation continue during production downtime .
per unit costs are sensitive to production rates .
key variable costs are natural gas and diesel fuel , which track commodity markets such as the canadian aeco natural gas sales index and crude prices respectively .
the table below shows benchmark prices that impact both our revenues and variable costs , listing high and low spot prices during the year. .

Table:
benchmark wti crude oil ( dollars per barrel )	high $ 145.29	date july 3	low $ 33.87	date december 19
western canadian select ( dollars per barrel ) ( a )	$ 114.95	july	$ 23.18	december
aeco natural gas sales index ( canadian dollars per gigajoule ) ( b )	$ 11.34	july 1	$ 5.42	september 19

Post-table text:
wti crude oil ( dollars per barrel ) $ 145.29 july 3 $ 33.87 december 19 western canadian select ( dollars per barrel ) ( a ) $ 114.95 july $ 23.18 december aeco natural gas sales index ( canadian dollars per gigajoule ) ( b ) $ 11.34 july 1 $ 5.42 september 19 ( a ) monthly pricing based upon average wti adjusted for differentials unique to western canada .
( b ) alberta energy company day ahead index .
our osm segment reported income of $ 258 million for 2008 , reflecting synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil sales averaging 32 mboepd .
derivative instruments intended to hedge price risk on future sales have impacted revenues in the periods presented , with net gains of $ 48 million in 2008 and net losses of $ 53 million in 2007 .
in the first quarter of 2009 , we entered into derivative instruments which effectively offset certain of our open derivative positions .
refining , marketing and transportation rm&t segment income depends largely on our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin , refinery throughputs , retail marketing gross margins for gasoline , distillates and merchandise , and the profitability of our pipeline transportation operations. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in millions for 2013 , what were net trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments?

Pre-table text:
jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report 215 the firm does not estimate the fair value of consumer lending-related commitments .
in many cases , the firm can reduce or cancel these commitments by providing the borrower notice or , in some cases , without notice as permitted by law .
for a further discussion of the valuation of lending-related commitments , see page 198 of this note .
trading assets and liabilities trading assets include debt and equity instruments owned by jpmorgan chase ( 201clong 201d positions ) that are held for client market-making and client-driven activities , as well as for certain risk management activities , certain loans managed on a fair value basis and for which the firm has elected the fair value option , and physical commodities inventories that are generally accounted for at the lower of cost or market ( market approximates fair value ) .
trading liabilities include debt and equity instruments that the firm has sold to other parties but does not own ( 201cshort 201d positions ) .
the firm is obligated to purchase instruments at a future date to cover the short positions .
included in trading assets and trading liabilities are the reported receivables ( unrealized gains ) and payables ( unrealized losses ) related to derivatives .
trading assets and liabilities are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets .
balances reflect the reduction of securities owned ( long positions ) by the amount of identical securities sold but not yet purchased ( short positions ) .
trading assets and liabilities 2013 average balances average trading assets and liabilities were as follows for the periods indicated. .

Table:
year ended december 31 ( in millions )	2013	2012	2011
trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments	$ 340449	$ 349337	$ 393890
trading assets 2013 derivative receivables	72629	85744	90003
trading liabilities 2013 debt and equity instruments ( a )	77706	69001	81916
trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables	64553	76162	71539

Post-table text:
( a ) primarily represent securities sold , not yet purchased .
note 4 2013 fair value option the fair value option provides an option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets , financial liabilities , unrecognized firm commitments , and written loan commitments not previously carried at fair value .
elections elections were made by the firm to : 2022 mitigate income statement volatility caused by the differences in the measurement basis of elected instruments ( for example , certain instruments elected were previously accounted for on an accrual basis ) while the associated risk management arrangements are accounted for on a fair value basis ; 2022 eliminate the complexities of applying certain accounting models ( e.g. , hedge accounting or bifurcation accounting for hybrid instruments ) ; and/or 2022 better reflect those instruments that are managed on a fair value basis .
elections include the following : 2022 loans purchased or originated as part of securitization warehousing activity , subject to bifurcation accounting , or managed on a fair value basis .
2022 securities financing arrangements with an embedded derivative and/or a maturity of greater than one year .
2022 owned beneficial interests in securitized financial assets that contain embedded credit derivatives , which would otherwise be required to be separately accounted for as a derivative instrument .
2022 certain investments that receive tax credits and other equity investments acquired as part of the washington mutual transaction .
2022 structured notes issued as part of cib 2019s client-driven activities .
( structured notes are predominantly financial instruments that contain embedded derivatives. ) 2022 long-term beneficial interests issued by cib 2019s consolidated securitization trusts where the underlying assets are carried at fair value. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage change in the expenses related to he issuing of stock option in 2009

Pre-table text:
material impact on the service cost and interest cost components of net periodic benefit costs for a 1% ( 1 % ) change in the assumed health care trend rate .
for most of the participants in the u.s .
plan , aon 2019s liability for future plan cost increases for pre-65 and medical supplement plan coverage is limited to 5% ( 5 % ) per annum .
because of this cap , net employer trend rates for these plans are effectively limited to 5% ( 5 % ) per year in the future .
during 2007 , aon recognized a plan amendment which phases out post-65 retiree coverage in its u.s .
plan over the next three years .
the impact of this amendment on net periodic benefit cost is being recognized over the average remaining service life of the employees .
14 .
stock compensation plans the following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense recognized in continuing operations in the consolidated statements of income in compensation and benefits ( in millions ) : .

Table:
years ended december 31	2010	2009	2008
rsus	$ 138	$ 124	$ 132
performance plans	62	60	67
stock options	17	21	24
employee stock purchase plans	4	4	3
total stock-based compensation expense	221	209	226
tax benefit	75	68	82
stock-based compensation expense net of tax	$ 146	$ 141	$ 144

Post-table text:
during 2009 , the company converted its stock administration system to a new service provider .
in connection with this conversion , a reconciliation of the methodologies and estimates utilized was performed , which resulted in a $ 12 million reduction of expense for the year ended december 31 , 2009 .
stock awards stock awards , in the form of rsus , are granted to certain employees and consist of both performance-based and service-based rsus .
service-based awards generally vest between three and ten years from the date of grant .
the fair value of service-based awards is based upon the market value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant .
with certain limited exceptions , any break in continuous employment will cause the forfeiture of all unvested awards .
compensation expense associated with stock awards is recognized over the service period .
dividend equivalents are paid on certain service-based rsus , based on the initial grant amount .
performance-based rsus have been granted to certain employees .
vesting of these awards is contingent upon meeting various individual , divisional or company-wide performance conditions , including revenue generation or growth in revenue , pretax income or earnings per share over a one- to five-year period .
the performance conditions are not considered in the determination of the grant date fair value for these awards .
the fair value of performance-based awards is based upon the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant .
compensation expense is recognized over the performance period , and in certain cases an additional vesting period , based on management 2019s estimate of the number of units expected to vest .
compensation expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of shares paid out at the end of the programs .
the actual payout of shares under these performance- based plans may range from 0-200% ( 0-200 % ) of the number of units granted , based on the plan .
dividend equivalents are generally not paid on the performance-based rsus .
during 2010 , the company granted approximately 1.6 million shares in connection with the completion of the 2007 leadership performance plan ( 2018 2018lpp 2019 2019 ) cycle and 84000 shares related to other performance plans .
during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company granted approximately 3.5 million .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what portion of total value of net operating loss carryforwards is related to state?

Pre-table text:
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) at december 31 , 2005 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income of approximately $ 2.2 billion and $ 2.4 billion , respectively .
if not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
years ended december 31,	federal	state
2006 to 2010	$ 5248	$ 469747
2011 to 2015	10012	272662
2016 to 2020	397691	777707
2021 to 2025	1744552	897896
total	$ 2157503	$ 2418012

Post-table text:
sfas no .
109 , 201caccounting for income taxes , 201d requires that companies record a valuation allowance when it is 201cmore likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . 201d at december 31 , 2005 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 422.4 million , including approximately $ 249.5 million attributable to spectrasite , primarily related to net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards .
approximately $ 237.8 million of the spectrasite valuation allowance was assumed as of the acquisition date .
the balance of the valuation allowance primarily relates to net state deferred tax assets .
the company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining deferred tax assets , primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards , as management believes the company will have sufficient time to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period .
the company intends to recover a portion of its deferred tax asset through its federal income tax refund claims related to the carry back of certain federal net operating losses .
in june 2003 and october 2003 , the company filed federal income tax refund claims with the irs relating to the carry back of $ 380.0 million of net operating losses generated prior to 2003 , of which the company initially anticipated receiving approximately $ 90.0 million .
based on preliminary discussions with tax authorities , the company has revised its estimate of the net realizable value of the federal income tax refund claims and anticipates receiving a refund of approximately $ 65.0 million as a result of these claims by the end of 2006 .
there can be no assurances , however , with respect to the specific amount and timing of any refund .
the recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing stable state ( no growth ) projections based on its current operations .
the projections show a significant decrease in depreciation and interest expense in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period and debt repayments reducing interest expense .
accordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other non-routine transactions .
based on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized .
the realization of the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2005 will be dependent upon its ability to generate approximately $ 1.3 billion in taxable income from january 1 , 2006 to december 31 , 2025 .
if the company is unable to generate sufficient taxable income in the future , or carry back losses , as described above , it will be required to reduce its net deferred tax asset through a charge to income tax expense , which would result in a corresponding decrease in stockholders 2019 equity .
from time to time the company is subject to examination by various tax authorities in jurisdictions in which the company has significant business operations .
the company regularly assesses the likelihood of additional assessments in each of the tax jurisdictions resulting from these examinations .
during the year ended .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the net change in cash in 2015?

Pre-table text:
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .

Table:
cash flow data	years ended december 31 , 2015	years ended december 31 , 2014	years ended december 31 , 2013
net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1	$ 848.2	$ 831.2	$ 598.4
net cash used in working capital2	-117.5 ( 117.5 )	-131.1 ( 131.1 )	-9.6 ( 9.6 )
changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash	-56.7 ( 56.7 )	-30.6 ( 30.6 )	4.1
net cash provided by operating activities	$ 674.0	$ 669.5	$ 592.9
net cash used in investing activities	-202.8 ( 202.8 )	-200.8 ( 200.8 )	-224.5 ( 224.5 )
net cash used in financing activities	-472.8 ( 472.8 )	-343.9 ( 343.9 )	-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )

Post-table text:
1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .
2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .
due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .
our net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .
net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .
our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .
the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .
in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .
to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .
the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .
our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .
our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .
for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .
investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .
net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .
capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .
we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}