[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percent of minimum total assets available for default that was guaranty fund contributions ( 2 )

Pre-table text:
2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts .
in the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation .
these assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights .
in addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm .
thereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package .
we would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit .
we maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing .
we have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion .
we may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms .
the credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit .
pledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s .
treasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs .
performance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line .
in addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default .
aggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit .
a defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm .
the following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) .
.
.
.
.
2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit .
( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms .
( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund .
( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .

Table:
( in millions )	cme clearingavailable assets
designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 )	$ 100.0
guaranty fund contributions ( 2 )	2899.5
assessment powers ( 3 )	7973.6
minimum total assets available for default ( 4 )	$ 10973.1

Post-table text:
2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts .
in the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation .
these assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights .
in addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm .
thereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package .
we would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit .
we maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing .
we have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion .
we may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms .
the credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit .
pledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s .
treasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs .
performance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line .
in addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default .
aggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit .
a defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm .
the following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) .
.
.
.
.
2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit .
( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms .
( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund .
( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
considering the gaap basis , what was the growth observed in the effective tax rate during 2012 and 2013?

Pre-table text:
shutdown .
the customer , which primarily received products from the tonnage gases segment , filed for bankruptcy in may 2012 and announced the mill shutdown in august 2012 .
pension settlement loss our u.s .
supplemental pension plan provides for a lump sum benefit payment option at the time of retirement , or for corporate officers , six months after the retirement date .
pension settlements are recognized when cash payments exceed the sum of the service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost of the plan for the fiscal year .
the participant 2019s vested benefit is considered fully settled upon cash payment of the lump sum .
we recognized $ 12.4 of settlement charges in 2013 .
advisory costs during the fourth quarter of 2013 , we incurred legal and other advisory fees of $ 10.1 ( $ 6.4 after-tax , or $ .03 per share ) in connection with our response to the rapid acquisition of a large position in shares of our common stock by pershing square capital management llc and its affiliates ( pershing square ) .
these fees , which are reflected on the consolidated income statements as 201cadvisory costs , 201d include costs incurred before and after pershing square 2019s disclosure of its holdings and cover advisory services related to the adoption of the shareholders rights plan , preparation for a potential proxy solicitation campaign , and entering into an agreement with pershing square .
other income ( expense ) , net items recorded to other income ( expense ) , net arise from transactions and events not directly related to our principal income earning activities .
the detail of other income ( expense ) , net is presented in note 23 , supplemental information , to the consolidated financial statements .
2013 vs .
2012 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 70.2 increased $ 23.1 , primarily due to higher gains from the sale of a number of small assets and investments and a favorable commercial contract settlement , partially offset by lower government grants .
otherwise , no individual items were significant in comparison to the prior year .
2012 vs .
2011 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 47.1 increased $ 5.4 , primarily due to favorable foreign exchange and reimbursements from government grants for expense , partially offset by lower gains from the sale of assets .
otherwise , no individual items were significant in comparison to the prior year .
interest expense .

Table:
	2013	2012	2011
interest incurred	$ 167.6	$ 153.9	$ 138.2
less : capitalized interest	25.8	30.2	22.7
interest expense	$ 141.8	$ 123.7	$ 115.5

Post-table text:
2013 vs .
2012 interest incurred increased $ 13.7 .
the increase was driven primarily by a higher average debt balance for $ 41 , partially offset by a lower average interest rate on the debt portfolio of $ 24 .
the change in capitalized interest was driven by a decrease in project spending and a lower average interest rate .
2012 vs .
2011 interest incurred increased $ 15.7 .
the increase was driven primarily by a higher average debt balance and debt issuance costs related to the indura s.a .
acquisition , partially offset by the impact of a stronger dollar on the translation of foreign currency interest .
the change in capitalized interest was driven by an increase in project spending which qualified for capitalization .
effective tax rate the effective tax rate equals the income tax provision divided by income from continuing operations before taxes .
refer to note 22 , income taxes , to the consolidated financial statements for details on factors affecting the effective tax rate .
2013 vs .
2012 on a gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 22.8% ( 22.8 % ) and 21.9% ( 21.9 % ) in 2013 and 2012 , respectively .
the current year rate includes income tax benefits of $ 73.7 related to the business restructuring and cost reduction plans and $ 3.7 for the advisory costs .
the prior year rate includes income tax benefits of $ 105.0 related to the business restructuring and cost reduction plans , $ 58.3 related to the second quarter spanish tax ruling , and $ 3.7 related to the customer .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
for the year ended december 302007 what was the net margin

Pre-table text:
goodwill goodwill represents the excess of the solexa purchase price over the sum of the amounts assigned to assets acquired less liabilities assumed .
the company believes that the acquisition of solexa will produce the following significant benefits : 2022 increased market presence and opportunities .
the combination of the company and solexa should increase the combined company 2019s market presence and opportunities for growth in revenue , earnings and stockholder return .
the company believes that the solexa technology is highly complementary to the company 2019s own portfolio of products and services and will enhance the company 2019s capabilities to service its existing customers , as well as accelerate the develop- ment of additional technologies , products and services .
the company believes that integrating solexa 2019s capabilities with the company 2019s technologies will better position the company to address the emerging biomarker research and development and in-vitro and molecular diag- nostic markets .
the company began to recognize revenue from products shipped as a result of this acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 .
2022 operating efficiencies .
the combination of the company and solexa provides the opportunity for potential economies of scale and cost savings .
the company believes that these primary factors support the amount of goodwill recognized as a result of the purchase price paid for solexa , in relation to other acquired tangible and intangible assets , including in-process research and development .
the following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of the company 2019s operations for the specified reporting periods as though the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of that period ( in thousands , except per share data ) : year ended december 30 , year ended december 31 .

Table:
	year ended december 30 2007	year ended december 31 2006
revenue	$ 366854	$ 187103
net income ( loss )	$ 17388	$ -38957 ( 38957 )
net income ( loss ) per share basic	$ 0.32	$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )
net income ( loss ) per share diluted	$ 0.29	$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )

Post-table text:
the pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations had the acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented , or the results that may occur in the future .
the pro forma results exclude the $ 303.4 million non-cash acquired ipr&d charge recorded upon the closing of the acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 .
investment in solexa on november 12 , 2006 , the company entered into a definitive securities purchase agreement with solexa in which the company invested approximately $ 50 million in solexa in exchange for 5154639 newly issued shares of solexa common stock in conjunction with the merger of the two companies .
this investment was valued at $ 67.8 million as of december 31 , 2006 , which represented a market value of $ 13.15 per share of solexa common stock .
this investment was eliminated as part of the company 2019s purchase accounting upon the closing of the merger on january 26 , 2007 .
illumina , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percentage increase in total accumulated other comprehensive losses from 2013 to 2014?

Pre-table text:
note 17 .
accumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: .

Table:
( losses ) earnings ( in millions )	( losses ) earnings 2015	( losses ) earnings 2014	2013
currency translation adjustments	$ -6129 ( 6129 )	$ -3929 ( 3929 )	$ -2207 ( 2207 )
pension and other benefits	-3332 ( 3332 )	-3020 ( 3020 )	-2046 ( 2046 )
derivatives accounted for as hedges	59	123	63
total accumulated other comprehensive losses	$ -9402 ( 9402 )	$ -6826 ( 6826 )	$ -4190 ( 4190 )

Post-table text:
reclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 .
the movement in currency translation adjustments for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , was also impacted by the purchase of the remaining shares of the mexican tobacco business .
in addition , $ 1 million , $ 5 million and $ 12 million of net currency translation adjustment gains were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , upon liquidation of subsidiaries .
for additional information , see note 13 .
benefit plans and note 15 .
financial instruments for disclosures related to pmi's pension and other benefits and derivative financial instruments .
note 18 .
colombian investment and cooperation agreement : on june 19 , 2009 , pmi announced that it had signed an agreement with the republic of colombia , together with the departments of colombia and the capital district of bogota , to promote investment and cooperation with respect to the colombian tobacco market and to fight counterfeit and contraband tobacco products .
the investment and cooperation agreement provides $ 200 million in funding to the colombian governments over a 20-year period to address issues of mutual interest , such as combating the illegal cigarette trade , including the threat of counterfeit tobacco products , and increasing the quality and quantity of locally grown tobacco .
as a result of the investment and cooperation agreement , pmi recorded a pre-tax charge of $ 135 million in the operating results of the latin america & canada segment during the second quarter of 2009 .
at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , pmi had $ 73 million and $ 71 million , respectively , of discounted liabilities associated with the colombian investment and cooperation agreement .
these discounted liabilities are primarily reflected in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and are expected to be paid through 2028 .
note 19 .
rbh legal settlement : on july 31 , 2008 , rothmans inc .
( "rothmans" ) announced the finalization of a cad 550 million settlement ( or approximately $ 540 million , based on the prevailing exchange rate at that time ) between itself and rothmans , benson & hedges inc .
( "rbh" ) , on the one hand , and the government of canada and all 10 provinces , on the other hand .
the settlement resolved the royal canadian mounted police's investigation relating to products exported from canada by rbh during the 1989-1996 period .
rothmans' sole holding was a 60% ( 60 % ) interest in rbh .
the remaining 40% ( 40 % ) interest in rbh was owned by pmi. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the net change in net revenue during 2016 for entergy texas , inc.?

Pre-table text:
entergy texas , inc .
and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue .
2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 5.2 million primarily due to the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue and a lower effective tax rate .
net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2015 net revenue	$ 637.2
reserve equalization	14.3
purchased power capacity	12.4
transmission revenue	7.0
retail electric price	5.4
net wholesale	-27.8 ( 27.8 )
other	-4.3 ( 4.3 )
2016 net revenue	$ 644.2

Post-table text:
the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a reduction in reserve equalization expense primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the execution of a new purchased power agreement and entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement , each in november 2015 , and entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement .
the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased expenses due to the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 , as well as capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts .
the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in attachment o rates charged by miso to transmission customers and a settlement of attachment o rates previously billed to transmission customers by miso. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . for the period ending 12/29/2018?

Pre-table text:
part ii .
item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns .
as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock .
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .
fiscal year ending december 29 .
copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global .
all rights reserved .
nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc .
s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .

Table:
	12/28/2013	1/3/2015	1/2/2016	12/31/2016	12/30/2017	12/29/2018
cadence design systems inc .	$ 100.00	$ 135.18	$ 149.39	$ 181.05	$ 300.22	$ 311.13
nasdaq composite	100.00	112.60	113.64	133.19	172.11	165.84
s&p 500	100.00	110.28	109.54	129.05	157.22	150.33
s&p 500 information technology	100.00	115.49	121.08	144.85	201.10	200.52

Post-table text:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the ratio of the snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index in 2012

Pre-table text:
five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2007 , assuming that dividends were reinvested .
the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group .
snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .

Table:
fiscal year ended ( 2 )	snap-onincorporated	peer group ( 3 )	s&p 500
december 31 2007	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
december 31 2008	83.66	66.15	63.00
december 31 2009	93.20	84.12	79.67
december 31 2010	128.21	112.02	91.67
december 31 2011	117.47	109.70	93.61
december 31 2012	187.26	129.00	108.59

Post-table text:
( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 , and that dividends were reinvested quarterly .
( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 .
( 3 ) the peer group consists of : stanley black & decker , inc. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair ltd. , spx corporation and w.w .
grainger , inc .
cooper industries plc , a former member of the peer group , was removed , as it was acquired by a larger , non-comparable company in 2012 .
2012 annual report 23 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 2007 2008 201120102009 2012 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the total revenues in 2009 based on the consulting segment generated 17% ( 17 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in millions

Pre-table text:
of exiting a business in japan , economic weakness in asia and political unrest in thailand , partially offset by growth in new zealand and certain emerging markets .
reinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue increased 48% ( 48 % ) , due mainly to the benfield merger , partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency translation .
organic revenue is even with 2008 , as growth in domestic treaty business and slightly higher pricing was offset by greater client retention , and declines in investment banking and facultative placements .
operating income operating income increased $ 54 million or 6% ( 6 % ) from 2008 to $ 900 million in 2009 .
in 2009 , operating income margins in this segment were 14.3% ( 14.3 % ) , up 60 basis points from 13.7% ( 13.7 % ) in 2008 .
contributing to increased operating income and margins were the merger with benfield , lower e&o costs due to insurance recoveries , a pension curtailment gain of $ 54 million in 2009 versus a curtailment loss of $ 6 million in 2008 , declines in anti-corruption and compliance initiative costs of $ 35 million , restructuring savings , and other cost savings initiatives .
these items were partially offset by an increase of $ 140 million in restructuring costs , $ 95 million of lower fiduciary investment income , benfield integration costs and higher amortization of intangible assets obtained in the merger , and unfavorable foreign currency translation .
consulting .

Table:
years ended december 31,	2009	2008	2007
segment revenue	$ 1267	$ 1356	$ 1345
segment operating income	203	208	180
segment operating income margin	16.0% ( 16.0 % )	15.3% ( 15.3 % )	13.4% ( 13.4 % )

Post-table text:
our consulting segment generated 17% ( 17 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2009 and provides a broad range of human capital consulting services , as follows : consulting services : 1 .
health and benefits advises clients about how to structure , fund , and administer employee benefit programs that attract , retain , and motivate employees .
benefits consulting include health and welfare , executive benefits , workforce strategies and productivity , absence management , benefits administration , data-driven health , compliance , employee commitment , investment advisory and elective benefits services .
2 .
retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , investment consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration .
3 .
compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries .
4 .
strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management .
outsourcing offers employment processing , performance improvement , benefits administration and other employment-related services .
beginning in late 2008 and continuing throughout 2009 , the disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets has created significant uncertainty in the marketplace .
the prolonged economic downturn is adversely impacting our clients 2019 financial condition and the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate .
while we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and depressing the price of those services , which is having an adverse effect on our new business and results of operations. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percentage of allowance of the company's purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010?

Pre-table text:
included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup .
in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield .
accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above .
in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield .
however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield .
where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method .
the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 .
the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .

Table:
in millions of dollars	accretable yield	carrying amount of loan receivable	allowance
beginning balance	$ 27	$ 920	$ 95
purchases ( 1 )	1	130	2014
disposals/payments received	-11 ( 11 )	-594 ( 594 )	2014
accretion	-44 ( 44 )	44	2014
builds ( reductions ) to the allowance	128	2014	-18 ( 18 )
increase to expected cash flows	-2 ( 2 )	19	2014
fx/other	17	-50 ( 50 )	2014
balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )	$ 116	$ 469	$ 77

Post-table text:
( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method .
these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date .
the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates .
( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was highest net rental expense in millions?

Pre-table text:
marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements of the $ 446 million present value of net minimum capital lease payments , $ 53 million was related to obligations assumed by united states steel under the financial matters agreement .
operating lease rental expense was : ( in millions ) 2009 2008 2007 minimum rental ( a ) $ 238 $ 245 $ 209 .

Table:
( in millions )	2009	2008	2007
minimum rental ( a )	$ 238	$ 245	$ 209
contingent rental	19	22	33
net rental expense	$ 257	$ 267	$ 242

Post-table text:
( a ) excludes $ 3 million , $ 5 million and $ 8 million paid by united states steel in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 on assumed leases .
26 .
commitments and contingencies we are the subject of , or party to , a number of pending or threatened legal actions , contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters , including laws and regulations relating to the environment .
certain of these matters are discussed below .
the ultimate resolution of these contingencies could , individually or in the aggregate , be material to our consolidated financial statements .
however , management believes that we will remain a viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies could be resolved unfavorably .
environmental matters 2013 we are subject to federal , state , local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the environment .
these laws generally provide for control of pollutants released into the environment and require responsible parties to undertake remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites .
penalties may be imposed for noncompliance .
at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , accrued liabilities for remediation totaled $ 116 million and $ 111 million .
it is not presently possible to estimate the ultimate amount of all remediation costs that might be incurred or the penalties that may be imposed .
receivables for recoverable costs from certain states , under programs to assist companies in clean-up efforts related to underground storage tanks at retail marketing outlets , were $ 59 and $ 60 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 .
legal cases 2013 we , along with other refining companies , settled a number of lawsuits pertaining to methyl tertiary-butyl ether ( 201cmtbe 201d ) in 2008 .
presently , we are a defendant , along with other refining companies , in 27 cases arising in four states alleging damages for mtbe contamination .
like the cases that we settled in 2008 , 12 of the remaining cases are consolidated in a multi-district litigation ( 201cmdl 201d ) in the southern district of new york for pretrial proceedings .
the other 15 cases are in new york state courts ( nassau and suffolk counties ) .
plaintiffs in 26 of the 27 cases allege damages to water supply wells from contamination of groundwater by mtbe , similar to the damages claimed in the cases settled in 2008 .
in the remaining case , the new jersey department of environmental protection is seeking the cost of remediating mtbe contamination and natural resources damages allegedly resulting from contamination of groundwater by mtbe .
we are vigorously defending these cases .
we have engaged in settlement discussions related to the majority of these cases .
we do not expect our share of liability for these cases to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows .
we voluntarily discontinued producing mtbe in 2002 .
we are currently a party to one qui tam case , which alleges that marathon and other defendants violated the false claims act with respect to the reporting and payment of royalties on natural gas and natural gas liquids for federal and indian leases .
a qui tam action is an action in which the relator files suit on behalf of himself as well as the federal government .
the case currently pending is u.s .
ex rel harrold e .
wright v .
agip petroleum co .
et al .
it is primarily a gas valuation case .
marathon has reached a settlement with the relator and the doj which will be finalized after the indian tribes review and approve the settlement terms .
such settlement is not expected to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows .
guarantees 2013 we have provided certain guarantees , direct and indirect , of the indebtedness of other companies .
under the terms of most of these guarantee arrangements , we would be required to perform should the guaranteed party fail to fulfill its obligations under the specified arrangements .
in addition to these financial guarantees , we also have various performance guarantees related to specific agreements. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what would the investment income ( loss ) have been in 2015 without the gain from the sale of shares of arris group common stock in 2014?

Pre-table text:
consolidated other income ( expense ) items , net .

Table:
year ended december 31 ( in millions )	2015	2014	2013
interest expense	$ -2702 ( 2702 )	$ -2617 ( 2617 )	$ -2574 ( 2574 )
investment income ( loss ) net	81	296	576
equity in net income ( losses ) of investees net	-325 ( 325 )	97	-86 ( 86 )
other income ( expense ) net	320	-215 ( 215 )	-364 ( 364 )
total	$ -2626 ( 2626 )	$ -2439 ( 2439 )	$ -2448 ( 2448 )

Post-table text:
interest expense interest expense increased in 2015 primarily due to an increase in our debt outstanding and $ 47 million of additional interest expense associated with the early redemption in june 2015 of our $ 750 million aggregate principal amount of 5.85% ( 5.85 % ) senior notes due november 2015 and our $ 1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.90% ( 5.90 % ) senior notes due march 2016 .
interest expense increased in 2014 primarily due to the effect of our interest rate derivative financial instruments .
investment income ( loss ) , net the change in investment income ( loss ) , net in 2015 was primarily due to a $ 154 million gain related to the sale of our shares of arris group common stock in 2014 .
the change in investment income ( loss ) , net in 2014 was primarily due to a $ 443 million gain related to the sale of our investment in clearwire corporation in 2013 .
the components of investment income ( loss ) , net are presented in a table in note 7 to comcast 2019s consolidated financial statements .
equity in net income ( losses ) of investees , net the change in equity in net income ( losses ) of investees , net in 2015 was primarily due to twcc holding corp .
( 201cthe weather channel 201d ) recording impairment charges related to goodwill .
we recorded expenses of $ 333 million in 2015 that represent nbcuniversal 2019s proportionate share of these impairment charges .
the change in 2015 was also due to an increase in our proportionate share of losses in hulu , llc ( 201chulu 201d ) , which were driven by hulu 2019s higher programming and marketing costs .
in 2015 and 2014 , we recognized our pro- portionate share of losses of $ 106 million and $ 20 million , respectively , related to our investment in hulu .
the change in equity in net income ( losses ) of investees , net in 2014 was primarily due to $ 142 million of total equity losses recorded in 2013 attributable to our investment in hulu .
in july 2013 , we entered into an agreement to provide capital contributions totaling $ 247 million to hulu , which we had previously accounted for as a cost method investment .
this represented an agreement to provide our first capital contribution to hulu since we acquired our interest in it as part of our acquisition of a controlling interest in nbcuniversal in 2011 ( the 201cnbcuniversal transaction 201d ) ; therefore , we began to apply the equity method of accounting for this investment .
the change in the method of accounting for this investment required us to recognize our propor- tionate share of hulu 2019s accumulated losses from the date of the nbcuniversal transaction through july 2013 .
other income ( expense ) , net other income ( expense ) , net for 2015 included gains of $ 335 million on the sales of a business and an invest- ment , $ 240 million recorded on the settlement of a contingent consideration liability with general electric company ( 201cge 201d ) related to the acquisition of nbcuniversal , and $ 43 million related to an equity method investment .
these gains were partially offset by $ 236 million of expenses related to fair value adjustments to a contractual obligation .
see note 11 to comcast 2019s consolidated financial statements for additional information on this contractual obligation .
other income ( expense ) , net for 2014 included a $ 27 million favorable settlement of a contingency related to the at&t broadband transaction in 2002 , which was more than offset by $ 208 million of expenses related to 61 comcast 2015 annual report on form 10-k .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the current ratio of robert mondavi?

Pre-table text:
c o n s t e l l a t i o n b r a n d s , i n c .
baroness philippine de rothschild announced an agree- ment to maintain equal ownership of opus one .
opus one produces fine wines at its napa valley winery .
the acquisition of robert mondavi supports the com- pany 2019s strategy of strengthening the breadth of its portfolio across price segments to capitalize on the overall growth in the premium , super-premium and fine wine categories .
the company believes that the acquired robert mondavi brand names have strong brand recognition globally .
the vast majority of sales from these brands are generated in the united states .
the company is leveraging the robert mondavi brands in the united states through its selling , marketing and distribution infrastructure .
the company also intends to further expand distribution for the robert mondavi brands in europe through its constellation europe infrastructure .
the robert mondavi acquisition supports the com- pany 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories and geographies , and strengthens its competitive position in its core markets .
the robert mondavi acquisition provides the company with a greater presence in the growing premium , super-premium and fine wine sectors within the united states and the ability to capitalize on the broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets .
in particular , the company believes there are growth opportunities for premium , super-premium and fine wines in the united kingdom and other 201cnew world 201d wine markets .
total con- sideration paid in cash to the robert mondavi shareholders was $ 1030.7 million .
additionally , the company incurred direct acquisition costs of $ 12.0 million .
the purchase price was financed with borrowings under the company 2019s 2004 credit agreement ( as defined in note 9 ) .
in accordance with the purchase method of accounting , the acquired net assets are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition .
the purchase price was based primarily on the estimated future operating results of the robert mondavi business , including the factors described above , as well as an estimated benefit from operating cost synergies .
the results of operations of the robert mondavi busi- ness are reported in the constellation wines segment and have been included in the consolidated statements of income since the acquisition date .
the following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the robert mondavi acquisition at the date of acquisition , as adjusted for the final appraisal : ( in thousands ) .

Table:
current assets	$ 513782
property plant and equipment	438140
other assets	124450
trademarks	138000
goodwill	634203
total assets acquired	1848575
current liabilities	310919
long-term liabilities	494995
total liabilities assumed	805914
net assets acquired	$ 1042661

Post-table text:
the trademarks are not subject to amortization .
none of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes .
following the robert mondavi acquisition , the company sold certain of the acquired vineyard properties and related assets , investments accounted for under the equity method , and other winery properties and related assets , during the years ended february 28 , 2006 , and february 28 , 2005 .
the company realized net proceeds of $ 170.8 million from the sale of these assets during the year ended february 28 , 2006 .
amounts realized during the year ended february 28 , 2005 , were not material .
no gain or loss has been recognized upon the sale of these assets .
hardy acquisition 2013 on march 27 , 2003 , the company acquired control of brl hardy limited , now known as hardy wine company limited ( 201chardy 201d ) , and on april 9 , 2003 , the company completed its acquisition of all of hardy 2019s outstanding capital stock .
as a result of the acquisi- tion of hardy , the company also acquired the remaining 50% ( 50 % ) ownership of pacific wine partners llc ( 201cpwp 201d ) , the joint venture the company established with hardy in july 2001 .
the acquisition of hardy along with the remaining interest in pwp is referred to together as the 201chardy acquisition . 201d through this acquisition , the company acquired one of australia 2019s largest wine producers with interests in wineries and vineyards in most of australia 2019s major wine regions as well as new zealand and the united states and hardy 2019s marketing and sales operations in the united kingdom .
in october 2005 , pwp was merged into another subsidiary of the company .
total consideration paid in cash and class a common stock to the hardy shareholders was $ 1137.4 million .
additionally , the company recorded direct acquisition costs of $ 17.2 million .
the acquisition date for accounting pur- poses is march 27 , 2003 .
the company has recorded a $ 1.6 million reduction in the purchase price to reflect imputed interest between the accounting acquisition date and the final payment of consideration .
this charge is included as interest expense in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended february 29 , 2004 .
the cash portion of the purchase price paid to the hardy shareholders and optionholders ( $ 1060.2 million ) was financed with $ 660.2 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing credit agreement and $ 400.0 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing bridge loan agreement .
addi- tionally , the company issued 6577826 shares of the com- pany 2019s class a common stock , which were valued at $ 77.2 million based on the simple average of the closing market price of the company 2019s class a common stock beginning two days before and ending two days after april 4 , 2003 , the day the hardy shareholders elected the form of consid- eration they wished to receive .
the purchase price was based primarily on a discounted cash flow analysis that contemplated , among other things , the value of a broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets and a presence in the important australian winemaking regions .
the company and hardy have complementary businesses that share a common growth orientation and operating philosophy .
the hardy acquisition supports the company 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percent change in earnings for non-utility nuclear from 2001 to 2002?

Pre-table text:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances .
the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 .
the refund was made in december 2001 .
2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s .
utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas .
non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively .
the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 .
following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: .

Table:
	2002	2001	2000
net mw in operation at december 31	3955	3445	2475
generation in gwh for the year	29953	22614	7171
capacity factor for the year	93% ( 93 % )	93% ( 93 % )	94% ( 94 % )

Post-table text:
2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what were average backlog at year-end for mfc from 2013 to 2015 in millions?

Pre-table text:
backlog backlog decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to sales being recognized on several multi-year programs ( such as hmsc , nisc iii , ciog and nsf asc ) related to prior year awards and a limited number of large new business awards .
backlog decreased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower customer funding levels and declining activities on direct warfighter support programs impacted by defense budget reductions .
trends we expect is&gs 2019 2016 net sales to decline in the high-single digit percentage range as compared to 2015 , primarily driven by key loss contracts in an increasingly competitive environment , along with volume contraction on the segment 2019s major contracts .
operating profit is expected to decline at a higher percentage range in 2016 , as compared to net sales percentage declines , driven by higher margin program losses and re-compete programs awarded at lower margins .
accordingly , 2016 margins are expected to be lower than 2015 results .
missiles and fire control our mfc business segment provides air and missile defense systems ; tactical missiles and air-to-ground precision strike weapon systems ; logistics ; fire control systems ; mission operations support , readiness , engineering support and integration services ; manned and unmanned ground vehicles ; and energy management solutions .
mfc 2019s major programs include pac-3 , thaad , multiple launch rocket system , hellfire , jassm , javelin , apache , sniper ae , low altitude navigation and targeting infrared for night ( lantirn ae ) and sof clss .
mfc 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2015	2014	2013
net sales	$ 6770	$ 7092	$ 6795
operating profit	1282	1344	1379
operating margins	18.9% ( 18.9 % )	19.0% ( 19.0 % )	20.3% ( 20.3 % )
backlog at year-end	$ 15500	$ 13300	$ 14300

Post-table text:
2015 compared to 2014 mfc 2019s net sales in 2015 decreased $ 322 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to the same period in 2014 .
the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 345 million for air and missile defense programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily pac-3 ) and lower volume ( primarily thaad ) ; and approximately $ 85 million for tactical missile programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily guided multiple launch rocket system ( gmlrs ) ) and joint air-to-surface standoff missile , partially offset by increased deliveries for hellfire .
these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 55 million for energy solutions programs due to increased volume .
mfc 2019s operating profit in 2015 decreased $ 62 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2014 .
the decrease was attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 100 million for fire control programs due primarily to lower risk retirements ( primarily lantirn and sniper ) ; and approximately $ 65 million for tactical missile programs due to lower risk retirements ( primarily hellfire and gmlrs ) and fewer deliveries .
these decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 75 million for air and missile defense programs due to increased risk retirements ( primarily thaad ) .
adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 60 million lower in 2015 compared to 2014 .
2014 compared to 2013 mfc 2019s net sales increased $ 297 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .
the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 180 million for air and missile defense programs primarily due to increased volume for thaad ; about $ 115 million for fire control programs due to increased deliveries ( including apache ) ; and about $ 125 million for various other programs due to increased volume .
these increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 115 million for tactical missile programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily high mobility artillery rocket system and army tactical missile system ) .
mfc 2019s operating profit decreased $ 35 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .
the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 20 million for tactical missile programs due to net warranty reserve adjustments for various programs ( including jassm and gmlrs ) and fewer deliveries ; and approximately $ 45 million for various other programs due to lower risk retirements .
the decreases were offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 20 million for air and missile defense programs due to increased volume ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
as of december 31 , 2015 what was the percentage decline in the gross unrecognized tax benefits from 2014 to 2015

Pre-table text:
republic services , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the activity in our gross unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31: .

Table:
	2015	2014	2013
balance at beginning of year	$ 70.1	$ 72.0	$ 84.7
additions based on tax positions related to current year	0.2	0.8	0.3
additions for tax positions of prior years	1.4	5.0	11.4
reductions for tax positions of prior years	-10.2 ( 10.2 )	-6.0 ( 6.0 )	-2.4 ( 2.4 )
reductions for tax positions resulting from lapse of statute of limitations	-0.6 ( 0.6 )	-0.2 ( 0.2 )	-1.3 ( 1.3 )
settlements	-13.9 ( 13.9 )	-1.5 ( 1.5 )	-20.7 ( 20.7 )
balance at end of year	$ 47.0	$ 70.1	$ 72.0

Post-table text:
during 2015 , we settled tax matters in various states and puerto rico which reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 13.9 million .
during 2014 , we settled tax matters in various jurisdictions and reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 1.5 million .
during 2013 , we settled with the irs appeals division and the joint committee on taxation our 2009 and 2010 tax years .
the resolution of these tax periods in addition to various state tax resolutions during the year reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 20.7 million .
included in our gross unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 are $ 30.5 million and $ 45.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits ( net of the federal benefit on state matters ) that , if recognized , would affect our effective income tax rate in future periods .
we recognize interest and penalties as incurred within the provision for income taxes in our consolidated statements of income .
related to the unrecognized tax benefits previously noted , we recorded interest expense of approximately $ 1.2 million during 2015 and , in total as of december 31 , 2015 , have recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 10.3 million .
during 2014 , we accrued interest of approximately $ 1.5 million and , in total as of december 31 , 2014 , had recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 18.7 million .
during 2013 , we accrued interest of approximately $ 1.2 million and , in total as of december 31 , 2013 , had recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 17.0 million .
gross unrecognized benefits that we expect to settle in the following twelve months are in the range of $ 0 to $ 10 million ; however , it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may either increase or decrease in the next twelve months .
we are currently under examination or administrative review by state and local taxing authorities for various tax years .
these state audits are ongoing .
we believe the recorded liabilities for uncertain tax positions are adequate .
however , a significant assessment against us in excess of the liabilities recorded could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the growth rate in the number of stores during 2011?

Pre-table text:
the following table sets forth information concerning increases in the total number of our aap stores during the past five years: .

Table:
	2012	2011	2010	2009	2008
beginning stores	3460	3369	3264	3243	3153
new stores ( 1 )	116	95	110	75	109
stores closed	2014	-4 ( 4 )	-5 ( 5 )	-54 ( 54 )	-19 ( 19 )
ending stores	3576	3460	3369	3264	3243

Post-table text:
( 1 ) does not include stores that opened as relocations of previously existing stores within the same general market area or substantial renovations of stores .
store technology .
our store-based information systems are comprised of a proprietary and integrated point of sale , electronic parts catalog , or epc , and store-level inventory management system ( collectively "store system" ) .
information maintained by our store system is used to formulate pricing , marketing and merchandising strategies and to replenish inventory accurately and rapidly .
our fully integrated system enables our store team members to assist our customers in their parts selection and ordering based on the year , make , model and engine type of their vehicles .
our store system provides real-time inventory tracking at the store level allowing store team members to check the quantity of on-hand inventory for any sku , adjust stock levels for select items for store specific events , automatically process returns and defective merchandise , designate skus for cycle counts and track merchandise transfers .
if a hard-to-find part or accessory is not available at one of our stores , the store system can determine whether the part is carried and in-stock through our hub or pdq ae networks or can be ordered directly from one of our vendors .
available parts and accessories are then ordered electronically from another store , hub , pdq ae or directly from the vendor with immediate confirmation of price , availability and estimated delivery time .
our centrally-based epc data management system enables us to reduce the time needed to ( i ) exchange data with our vendors and ( ii ) catalog and deliver updated , accurate parts information .
we also support our store operations with additional proprietary systems and customer driven labor scheduling capabilities .
all of these systems are tightly integrated and provide real-time , comprehensive information to store personnel , resulting in improved customer service levels , team member productivity and in-stock availability .
we plan to start rolling out a new and enhanced epc in fiscal 2013 which is expected to simplify and improve the customer experience .
among the improvements is a more efficient way to systematically identify add-on sales to ensure our customers have what they need to complete their automotive repair project .
store support center merchandising .
purchasing for virtually all of the merchandise for our stores is handled by our merchandise teams located in three primary locations : 2022 store support center in roanoke , virginia ; 2022 regional office in minneapolis , minnesota ; and 2022 global sourcing office in taipei , taiwan .
our roanoke team is primarily responsible for the parts categories and our minnesota team is primarily responsible for accessories , oil and chemicals .
our global sourcing team works closely with both teams .
in fiscal 2012 , we purchased merchandise from approximately 450 vendors , with no single vendor accounting for more than 9% ( 9 % ) of purchases .
our purchasing strategy involves negotiating agreements with most of our vendors to purchase merchandise over a specified period of time along with other terms , including pricing , payment terms and volume .
the merchandising team has developed strong vendor relationships in the industry and , in a collaborative effort with our vendor partners , utilizes a category management process where we manage the mix of our product offerings to meet customer demand .
we believe this process , which develops a customer-focused business plan for each merchandise category , and our global sourcing operation are critical to improving comparable store sales , gross margin and inventory productivity. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what portion of the company owned facilities are located in europe?

Pre-table text:
item 1b .
unresolved staff comments .
item 2 .
properties .
our corporate co-headquarters are located in pittsburgh , pennsylvania and chicago , illinois .
our co-headquarters are leased and house our executive offices , certain u.s .
business units , and our administrative , finance , and human resource functions .
we maintain additional owned and leased offices throughout the regions in which we operate .
we manufacture our products in our network of manufacturing and processing facilities located throughout the world .
as of december 31 , 2016 , we operated 87 manufacturing and processing facilities .
we own 83 and lease four of these facilities .
our manufacturing and processing facilities count by segment as of december 31 , 2016 was: .

Table:
	owned	leased
united states	43	2
canada	3	2014
europe	11	2014
rest of world	26	2

Post-table text:
we maintain all of our manufacturing and processing facilities in good condition and believe they are suitable and are adequate for our present needs .
we also enter into co-manufacturing arrangements with third parties if we determine it is advantageous to outsource the production of any of our products .
in the fourth quarter of 2016 , we reorganized our segment structure to move our russia business from the rest of world segment to the europe segment .
we have reflected this change in the table above .
see note 18 , segment reporting , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .
several of our current manufacturing and processing facilities are scheduled to be closed within the next year .
see note 3 , integration and restructuring expenses , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .
item 3 .
legal proceedings .
we are routinely involved in legal proceedings , claims , and governmental inquiries , inspections or investigations ( 201clegal matters 201d ) arising in the ordinary course of our business .
on april 1 , 2015 , the commodity futures trading commission ( 201ccftc 201d ) filed a formal complaint against mondel 0113z international ( formerly known as kraft foods inc. ) and kraft in the u.s .
district court for the northern district of illinois , eastern division , related to activities involving the trading of december 2011 wheat futures contracts .
the complaint alleges that mondel 0113z international and kraft ( 1 ) manipulated or attempted to manipulate the wheat markets during the fall of 2011 , ( 2 ) violated position limit levels for wheat futures , and ( 3 ) engaged in non-competitive trades by trading both sides of exchange-for-physical chicago board of trade wheat contracts .
as previously disclosed by kraft , these activities arose prior to the october 1 , 2012 spin-off of kraft by mondel 0113z international to its shareholders and involve the business now owned and operated by mondel 0113z international or its affiliates .
the separation and distribution agreement between kraft and mondel 0113z international , dated as of september 27 , 2012 , governs the allocation of liabilities between mondel 0113z international and kraft and , accordingly , mondel 0113z international will predominantly bear the costs of this matter and any monetary penalties or other payments that the cftc may impose .
we do not expect this matter to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations , or business .
while we cannot predict with certainty the results of legal matters in which we are currently involved or may in the future be involved , we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve any of the legal matters that are currently pending will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations .
item 4 .
mine safety disclosures .
not applicable. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the average price per share from november to december?

Pre-table text:
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008 : number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs .

Table:
	total number of shares purchased	average price paid per share2	total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs	maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
october 1-31	29704	$ 5.99	2014	2014
november 1-30	4468	$ 3.24	2014	2014
december 1-31	12850	$ 3.98	2014	2014
total1	47022	$ 5.18	2014	2014

Post-table text:
total1 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) .
2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the gross carrying amount in millions of the company's purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010?

Pre-table text:
included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup .
in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield .
accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above .
in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield .
however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield .
where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method .
the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 .
the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .

Table:
in millions of dollars	accretable yield	carrying amount of loan receivable	allowance
beginning balance	$ 27	$ 920	$ 95
purchases ( 1 )	1	130	2014
disposals/payments received	-11 ( 11 )	-594 ( 594 )	2014
accretion	-44 ( 44 )	44	2014
builds ( reductions ) to the allowance	128	2014	-18 ( 18 )
increase to expected cash flows	-2 ( 2 )	19	2014
fx/other	17	-50 ( 50 )	2014
balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )	$ 116	$ 469	$ 77

Post-table text:
( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method .
these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date .
the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates .
( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
including the shares repurchased under the december 2007 repo agreement , what was the total authorized shares ( in millions ) eligible for repurchase under the january 23 , 2008 repurchase authorization?\\n\\n

Pre-table text:
page 19 of 94 responded to the request for information pursuant to section 104 ( e ) of cercla .
the usepa has initially estimated cleanup costs to be between $ 4 million and $ 5 million .
based on the information available to the company at the present time , the company does not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect upon the liquidity , results of operations or financial condition of the company .
europe in january 2003 the german government passed legislation that imposed a mandatory deposit of 25 eurocents on all one-way packages containing beverages except milk , wine , fruit juices and certain alcoholic beverages .
ball packaging europe gmbh ( bpe ) , together with certain other plaintiffs , contested the enactment of the mandatory deposit for non-returnable containers based on the german packaging regulation ( verpackungsverordnung ) in federal and state administrative court .
all other proceedings have been terminated except for the determination of minimal court fees that are still outstanding in some cases , together with minimal ancillary legal fees .
the relevant industries , including bpe and its competitors , have successfully set up a germany-wide return system for one-way beverage containers , which has been operational since may 1 , 2006 , the date required under the deposit legislation .
item 4 .
submission of matters to a vote of security holders there were no matters submitted to the security holders during the fourth quarter of 2007 .
part ii item 5 .
market for the registrant 2019s common stock and related stockholder matters ball corporation common stock ( bll ) is traded on the new york stock exchange and the chicago stock exchange .
there were 5424 common shareholders of record on february 3 , 2008 .
common stock repurchases the following table summarizes the company 2019s repurchases of its common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 .
purchases of securities total number of shares purchased ( a ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .

Table:
	total number of shares purchased ( a )	average pricepaid per share	total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs	maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b )
october 1 to october 28 2007	705292	$ 53.53	705292	4904824
october 29 to november 25 2007	431170	$ 48.11	431170	4473654
november 26 to december 31 2007	8310 ( c )	$ 44.99	8310	4465344
total	1144772	$ 51.42	1144772

Post-table text:
( a ) includes open market purchases and/or shares retained by the company to settle employee withholding tax liabilities .
( b ) the company has an ongoing repurchase program for which shares are authorized for repurchase from time to time by ball 2019s board of directors .
on january 23 , 2008 , ball's board of directors authorized the repurchase by the company of up to a total of 12 million shares of its common stock .
this repurchase authorization replaces all previous authorizations .
( c ) does not include 675000 shares under a forward share repurchase agreement entered into in december 2007 and settled on january 7 , 2008 , for approximately $ 31 million .
also does not include shares to be acquired in 2008 under an accelerated share repurchase program entered into in december 2007 and funded on january 7 , 2008. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return for ball corporation for the five year period ending 12/31/10?

Pre-table text:
page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 .
it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested .
the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization .
total return analysis .

Table:
	12/31/05	12/31/06	12/31/07	12/31/08	12/31/09	12/31/10
ball corporation	$ 100.00	$ 110.86	$ 115.36	$ 107.58	$ 134.96	$ 178.93
dj containers & packaging index	$ 100.00	$ 112.09	$ 119.63	$ 75.00	$ 105.34	$ 123.56
s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 115.80	$ 122.16	$ 76.96	$ 97.33	$ 111.99
copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )	copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )
copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .	copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage change in proportional free cash flow between 2013 and 2014?

Pre-table text:
proportional free cash flow ( a non-gaap measure ) we define proportional free cash flow as cash flows from operating activities less maintenance capital expenditures ( including non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ) , adjusted for the estimated impact of noncontrolling interests .
the proportionate share of cash flows and related adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests in our subsidiaries comprise the proportional adjustment factor presented in the reconciliation below .
upon the company's adoption of the accounting guidance for service concession arrangements effective january 1 , 2015 , capital expenditures related to service concession assets that would have been classified as investing activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows are now classified as operating activities .
see note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies of this form 10-k for further information on the adoption of this guidance .
beginning in the quarter ended march 31 , 2015 , the company changed the definition of proportional free cash flow to exclude the cash flows for capital expenditures related to service concession assets that are now classified within net cash provided by operating activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows .
the proportional adjustment factor for these capital expenditures is presented in the reconciliation below .
we also exclude environmental capital expenditures that are expected to be recovered through regulatory , contractual or other mechanisms .
an example of recoverable environmental capital expenditures is ipl's investment in mats-related environmental upgrades that are recovered through a tracker .
see item 1 . 2014us sbu 2014ipl 2014environmental matters for details of these investments .
the gaap measure most comparable to proportional free cash flow is cash flows from operating activities .
we believe that proportional free cash flow better reflects the underlying business performance of the company , as it measures the cash generated by the business , after the funding of maintenance capital expenditures , that may be available for investing or repaying debt or other purposes .
factors in this determination include the impact of noncontrolling interests , where aes consolidates the results of a subsidiary that is not wholly-owned by the company .
the presentation of free cash flow has material limitations .
proportional free cash flow should not be construed as an alternative to cash from operating activities , which is determined in accordance with gaap .
proportional free cash flow does not represent our cash flow available for discretionary payments because it excludes certain payments that are required or to which we have committed , such as debt service requirements and dividend payments .
our definition of proportional free cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies .
calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions ) 2015 2014 2013 2015/2014change 2014/2013 change .

Table:
calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions )	2015	2014	2013	2015/2014 change	2014/2013 change
net cash provided by operating activities	$ 2134	$ 1791	$ 2715	$ 343	$ -924 ( 924 )
add : capital expenditures related to service concession assets ( 1 )	165	2014	2014	165	2014
adjusted operating cash flow	2299	1791	2715	508	-924 ( 924 )
less : proportional adjustment factor on operating cash activities ( 2 ) ( 3 )	-558 ( 558 )	-359 ( 359 )	-834 ( 834 )	-199 ( 199 )	475
proportional adjusted operating cash flow	1741	1432	1881	309	-449 ( 449 )
less : proportional maintenance capital expenditures net of reinsurance proceeds ( 2 )	-449 ( 449 )	-485 ( 485 )	-535 ( 535 )	36	50
less : proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ( 2 ) ( 4 )	-51 ( 51 )	-56 ( 56 )	-75 ( 75 )	5	19
proportional free cash flow	$ 1241	$ 891	$ 1271	$ 350	$ -380 ( 380 )

Post-table text:
( 1 ) service concession asset expenditures excluded from proportional free cash flow non-gaap metric .
( 2 ) the proportional adjustment factor , proportional maintenance capital expenditures ( net of reinsurance proceeds ) and proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures are calculated by multiplying the percentage owned by noncontrolling interests for each entity by its corresponding consolidated cash flow metric and are totaled to the resulting figures .
for example , parent company a owns 20% ( 20 % ) of subsidiary company b , a consolidated subsidiary .
thus , subsidiary company b has an 80% ( 80 % ) noncontrolling interest .
assuming a consolidated net cash flow from operating activities of $ 100 from subsidiary b , the proportional adjustment factor for subsidiary b would equal $ 80 ( or $ 100 x 80% ( 80 % ) ) .
the company calculates the proportional adjustment factor for each consolidated business in this manner and then sums these amounts to determine the total proportional adjustment factor used in the reconciliation .
the proportional adjustment factor may differ from the proportion of income attributable to noncontrolling interests as a result of ( a ) non-cash items which impact income but not cash and ( b ) aes' ownership interest in the subsidiary where such items occur .
( 3 ) includes proportional adjustment amount for service concession asset expenditures of $ 84 million for the year ended december 31 , 2015 .
the company adopted service concession accounting effective january 1 , 2015 .
( 4 ) excludes ipl's proportional recoverable environmental capital expenditures of $ 205 million , $ 163 million and $ 110 million for the years december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}