[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
between december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , what was the change in the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs in billions?

Pre-table text:
the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2012 estimated expense as a baseline .
change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2012 pension expense ( in millions ) .

Table:
change in assumption ( a )	estimatedincrease to 2012pensionexpense ( in millions )
.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate	$ 23
.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets	$ 18
.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate	$ 2

Post-table text:
( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant .
our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions .
investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of permitted contributions in future years .
also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan .
we do not expect to be required by law to make any contributions to the plan during 2012 .
we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees .
recourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 3 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , pnc has sold commercial mortgage and residential mortgage loans directly or indirectly in securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions with continuing involvement .
one form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets in these transactions .
commercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate , close , and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s delegated underwriting and servicing ( dus ) program .
we participated in a similar program with the fhlmc .
under these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement .
at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 13.0 billion and $ 13.2 billion , respectively .
the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 4.0 billion at both december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 .
we maintain a reserve for estimated losses based on our exposure .
the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 47 million and $ 54 million as of december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .
if payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses .
our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment .
residential mortgage loan and home equity repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors .
these loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements .
residential mortgage loans covered by these loan repurchase obligations include first and second-lien mortgage loans we have sold through agency securitizations , non-agency securitizations , and whole-loan sale transactions .
as discussed in note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , agency securitizations consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with fnma , fhlmc , and the government national mortgage association ( gnma ) program , while non-agency securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with private investors .
our historical exposure and activity associated with agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with fnma and fhlmc , as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with federal housing agency ( fha ) and department of veterans affairs ( va ) -insured and uninsured loans pooled in gnma securitizations historically have been minimal .
repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment .
pnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition .
pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of the whole-loans sold in these transactions .
repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity lines/loans are reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment .
loan covenants and representations and warranties are established through loan sale agreements with various investors to provide assurance that pnc has sold loans to the pnc financial services group , inc .
2013 form 10-k 69 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage change in revenue on a pro forma basis between 2006 and 2007?

Pre-table text:
goodwill goodwill represents the excess of the solexa purchase price over the sum of the amounts assigned to assets acquired less liabilities assumed .
the company believes that the acquisition of solexa will produce the following significant benefits : 2022 increased market presence and opportunities .
the combination of the company and solexa should increase the combined company 2019s market presence and opportunities for growth in revenue , earnings and stockholder return .
the company believes that the solexa technology is highly complementary to the company 2019s own portfolio of products and services and will enhance the company 2019s capabilities to service its existing customers , as well as accelerate the develop- ment of additional technologies , products and services .
the company believes that integrating solexa 2019s capabilities with the company 2019s technologies will better position the company to address the emerging biomarker research and development and in-vitro and molecular diag- nostic markets .
the company began to recognize revenue from products shipped as a result of this acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 .
2022 operating efficiencies .
the combination of the company and solexa provides the opportunity for potential economies of scale and cost savings .
the company believes that these primary factors support the amount of goodwill recognized as a result of the purchase price paid for solexa , in relation to other acquired tangible and intangible assets , including in-process research and development .
the following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of the company 2019s operations for the specified reporting periods as though the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of that period ( in thousands , except per share data ) : year ended december 30 , year ended december 31 .

Table:
	year ended december 30 2007	year ended december 31 2006
revenue	$ 366854	$ 187103
net income ( loss )	$ 17388	$ -38957 ( 38957 )
net income ( loss ) per share basic	$ 0.32	$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )
net income ( loss ) per share diluted	$ 0.29	$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )

Post-table text:
the pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations had the acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented , or the results that may occur in the future .
the pro forma results exclude the $ 303.4 million non-cash acquired ipr&d charge recorded upon the closing of the acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 .
investment in solexa on november 12 , 2006 , the company entered into a definitive securities purchase agreement with solexa in which the company invested approximately $ 50 million in solexa in exchange for 5154639 newly issued shares of solexa common stock in conjunction with the merger of the two companies .
this investment was valued at $ 67.8 million as of december 31 , 2006 , which represented a market value of $ 13.15 per share of solexa common stock .
this investment was eliminated as part of the company 2019s purchase accounting upon the closing of the merger on january 26 , 2007 .
illumina , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the growth rate of the net earnings for basic and diluted eps?

Pre-table text:
the fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 .
as of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards .
this cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 .
during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested .
pmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 .
earnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method .
basic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: .

Table:
( in millions )	for the years ended december 31 , 2017	for the years ended december 31 , 2016	for the years ended december 31 , 2015
net earnings attributable to pmi	$ 6035	$ 6967	$ 6873
less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards	14	19	24
net earnings for basic and diluted eps	$ 6021	$ 6948	$ 6849
weighted-average shares for basic eps	1552	1551	1549
plus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus )	1	2014	2014
weighted-average shares for diluted eps	1553	1551	1549

Post-table text:
for the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percentage difference in the fair value per share between 2014 and 2015?

Pre-table text:
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 13 .
common stock ( continued ) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program ( the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019 ) .
under the nonemployee directors program , upon a director 2019s initial election to the board , the director receives an initial grant of stock options or restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $ 0.2 million , not to exceed 20000 shares .
these grants vest over three years from the date of grant , subject to the director 2019s continued service .
in addition , annually each nonemployee director may receive up to 40000 stock options or 16000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock , or a combination thereof , provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $ 0.2 million .
these grants generally vest over one year from the date of grant .
under the nonemployee directors program , an aggregate of 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance .
the company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees ( collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) .
under the espp , eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase .
under the espp , employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% ( 12 % ) of their compensation for common stock purchases , subject to certain limitations .
the espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states , to the extent permitted by local law .
the espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code .
the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 13.8 million shares .
the fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables .
the risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s .
treasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award .
expected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards lifesciences 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards lifesciences 2019 stock .
the expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award , as well as historical exercise behavior , and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding .
the company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) .
the black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards .

Table:
	2016	2015	2014
average risk-free interest rate	1.1% ( 1.1 % )	1.4% ( 1.4 % )	1.5% ( 1.5 % )
expected dividend yield	none	none	none
expected volatility	33% ( 33 % )	30% ( 30 % )	31% ( 31 % )
expected life ( years )	4.5	4.6	4.6
fair value per share	$ 31.00	$ 18.13	$ 11.75

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the average price per share of the company 2019s common stock in the third quarter of 2016?

Pre-table text:
part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities .
the company 2019s common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange .
prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company , the company 2019s common stock traded under the symbol 201caa . 201d in connection with the separation , on november 1 , 2016 , the company changed its stock symbol and its common stock began trading under the symbol 201carnc . 201d on october 5 , 2016 , the company 2019s common shareholders approved a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of the company 2019s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock ( the 201creverse stock split 201d ) .
as a result of the reverse stock split , every 3 shares of issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one issued and outstanding share of common stock , without any change in the par value per share .
the reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares , and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares .
the company 2019s common stock began trading on a reverse stock split-adjusted basis on october 6 , 2016 .
on november 1 , 2016 , the company completed the separation of its business into two independent , publicly traded companies : the company and alcoa corporation .
the separation was effected by means of a pro rata distribution by the company of 80.1% ( 80.1 % ) of the outstanding shares of alcoa corporation common stock to the company 2019s shareholders .
the company 2019s shareholders of record as of the close of business on october 20 , 2016 ( the 201crecord date 201d ) received one share of alcoa corporation common stock for every three shares of the company 2019s common stock held as of the record date .
the company retained 19.9% ( 19.9 % ) of the outstanding common stock of alcoa corporation immediately following the separation .
the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 .
the prices listed below for the fourth quarter of 2016 do not reflect any adjustment for the impact of the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , and therefore are not comparable to pre-separation prices from earlier periods. .

Table:
quarter	2016 high	2016 low	2016 dividend	2016 high	2016 low	dividend
first	$ 30.66	$ 18.42	$ 0.09	$ 51.30	$ 37.95	$ 0.09
second	34.50	26.34	0.09	42.87	33.45	0.09
third	32.91	27.09	0.09	33.69	23.91	0.09
fourth ( separation occurred on november 1 2016 )	32.10	16.75	0.09	33.54	23.43	0.09
year	$ 34.50	$ 16.75	$ 0.36	$ 51.30	$ 23.43	$ 0.36

Post-table text:
the number of holders of record of common stock was approximately 12885 as of february 23 , 2017. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage return for pmi common stock for the five years ended 2018?

Pre-table text:
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .
the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .
date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

Table:
date	pmi	pmi peer group ( 1 )	s&p 500 index
december 31 2013	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
december 31 2014	$ 97.90	$ 107.80	$ 113.70
december 31 2015	$ 111.00	$ 116.80	$ 115.30
december 31 2016	$ 120.50	$ 118.40	$ 129.00
december 31 2017	$ 144.50	$ 140.50	$ 157.20
december 31 2018	$ 96.50	$ 127.70	$ 150.30

Post-table text:
( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year .
the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .
the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .
as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .
note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the change in total debt to be repaid in the contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2005 between 2008 and 2007?

Pre-table text:
contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obli- gations at december 31 , 2005 , were as follows : in millions 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 thereafter .

Table:
in millions	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	thereafter
total debt	$ 1181	$ 570	$ 308	$ 2330	$ 1534	$ 6281
lease obligations	172	144	119	76	63	138
purchase obligations ( a )	3264	393	280	240	204	1238
total	$ 4617	$ 1107	$ 707	$ 2646	$ 1801	$ 7657

Post-table text:
( a ) the 2006 amount includes $ 2.4 billion for contracts made in the ordinary course of business to purchase pulpwood , logs and wood chips .
the majority of our other purchase obligations are take-or-pay or purchase commitments made in the ordinary course of business related to raw material purchases and energy contracts .
other significant items include purchase obligations related to contracted services .
transformation plan in july 2005 , the company announced a plan to focus its business portfolio on two key global platform businesses : uncoated papers ( including distribution ) and packaging .
the plan also focuses on improving shareholder return through mill realignments in those two businesses , additional cost improvements and exploring strategic options for other businesses , includ- ing possible sale or spin-off .
in connection with this process , in the third quarter of 2005 , the company completed the sale of its 50.5% ( 50.5 % ) interest in carter holt harvey limited .
other businesses currently under re- view include : 2022 the coated and supercalendered papers busi- ness , including the coated groundwood mill and associated assets in brazil , 2022 the beverage packaging business , including the pine bluff , arkansas mill , 2022 the kraft papers business , including the roa- noke rapids , north carolina mill , 2022 arizona chemical , 2022 the wood products business , and 2022 segments or potentially all of the company 2019s 6.5 million acres of u.s .
forestlands .
consistent with this evaluation process , the com- pany has distributed bid package information for some of these businesses .
the exact timing of this evaluation process will vary by business ; however , it is anticipated that decisions will be made for some of these businesses during 2006 .
while the exact use of any proceeds from potential future sales is dependent upon various factors affecting future cash flows , such as the amount of any proceeds received and changes in market conditions , input costs and capital spending , the company remains committed to using its free cash flow in 2006 to pay down debt , to return value to shareholders , and for se- lective high-return investments .
critical accounting policies the preparation of financial statements in con- formity with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states requires international paper to estab- lish accounting policies and to make estimates that af- fect both the amounts and timing of the recording of assets , liabilities , revenues and expenses .
some of these estimates require judgments about matters that are in- herently uncertain .
accounting policies whose application may have a significant effect on the reported results of operations and financial position of international paper , and that can require judgments by management that affect their application , include sfas no .
5 , 201caccounting for contingencies , 201d sfas no .
144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , 201d sfas no .
142 , 201cgoodwill and other intangible assets , 201d sfas no .
87 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for pensions , 201d sfas no .
106 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for postretirement benefits other than pensions , 201d as amended by sfas nos .
132 and 132r , 201cemployers 2019 disclosures about pension and other postretirement benefits , 201d and sfas no .
109 , 201caccounting for income taxes . 201d the following is a discussion of the impact of these accounting policies on international paper : contingent liabilities .
accruals for contingent li- abilities , including legal and environmental matters , are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred or an asset impaired and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated .
liabilities accrued for legal matters require judgments regarding projected outcomes and range of loss based on historical experience and recommendations of legal counsel .
additionally , as dis- cussed in note 10 of the notes to consolidated finan- cial statements in item 8 .
financial statements and supplementary data , reserves for projected future claims settlements relating to exterior siding and roofing prod- ucts previously manufactured by masonite require judgments regarding projections of future claims rates and amounts .
international paper utilizes an in- dependent third party consultant to assist in developing these estimates .
liabilities for environmental matters require evaluations of relevant environmental regu- lations and estimates of future remediation alternatives and costs .
international paper determines these esti- mates after a detailed evaluation of each site .
impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill .
an impairment of a long-lived asset exists when the asset 2019s carrying amount exceeds its fair value , and is recorded when the carrying amount is not recoverable through future operations .
a goodwill impairment exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its fair value .
assessments of possible impairments of long-lived assets and goodwill are made when events or changes in cir- cumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
for the five years ended 12/31/2006 what is the performance difference of the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . and the dow jones transportation average?

Pre-table text:
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing .
the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .
the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .
comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

Table:
	12/31/01	12/31/02	12/31/03	12/31/04	12/31/05	12/31/06
united parcel service inc .	$ 100.00	$ 117.19	$ 140.49	$ 163.54	$ 146.35	$ 148.92
s&p 500 index	$ 100.00	$ 77.90	$ 100.24	$ 111.15	$ 116.61	$ 135.02
dow jones transportation average	$ 100.00	$ 88.52	$ 116.70	$ 149.06	$ 166.42	$ 182.76

Post-table text:
securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .
these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what were total operating expenses as a percentage of revenue in 2013?

Pre-table text:
table of contents notes to consolidated financial statements of american airlines group inc .
information generated by market transactions involving comparable assets , as well as pricing guides and other sources .
the current market for the aircraft , the maintenance condition of the aircraft and the expected proceeds from the sale of the assets , among other factors , were considered .
the market approach was utilized to value certain intangible assets such as airport take off and landing slots when sufficient market information was available .
the income approach was primarily used to value intangible assets , including customer relationships , marketing agreements , certain international route authorities , and the us airways tradename .
the income approach indicates value for a subject asset based on the present value of cash flows projected to be generated by the asset .
projected cash flows are discounted at a required market rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money .
the cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for certain assets for which the market and income approaches could not be applied due to the nature of the asset .
the cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost for the asset , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation .
the fair value of us airways 2019 dividend miles loyalty program liability was determined based on the weighted average equivalent ticket value of outstanding miles which were expected to be redeemed for future travel at december 9 , 2013 .
the weighted average equivalent ticket value contemplates differing classes of service , domestic and international itineraries and the carrier providing the award travel .
pro-forma impact of the merger the company 2019s unaudited pro-forma results presented below include the effects of the merger as if it had been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 .
the pro-forma results include the depreciation and amortization associated with the acquired tangible and intangible assets , lease and debt fair value adjustments , the elimination of any deferred gains or losses , adjustments relating to reflecting the fair value of the loyalty program liability and the impact of income changes on profit sharing expense , among others .
in addition , the pro-forma results below reflect the impact of higher wage rates related to memorandums of understanding with us airways 2019 pilots that became effective upon closing of the merger , as well as the elimination of the company 2019s reorganization items , net and merger transition costs .
however , the pro-forma results do not include any anticipated synergies or other expected benefits of the merger .
accordingly , the unaudited pro-forma financial information below is not necessarily indicative of either future results of operations or results that might have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 .
december 31 , ( in millions ) .

Table:
	december 31 2013 ( in millions )
revenue	$ 40678
net income	2526

Post-table text:
5 .
basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies ( a ) basis of presentation the consolidated financial statements for the full years of 2015 and 2014 and the period from december 9 , 2013 to december 31 , 2013 include the accounts of the company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries .
for the periods prior to december 9 , 2013 , the consolidated financial statements do not include the accounts of us airways group .
all significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated .
the preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities , revenues and expenses , and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements .
actual results could differ from those estimates .
the most significant areas .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the net change in net revenue during 2003 for entergy louisiana , inc.?

Pre-table text:
entergy louisiana , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 98.0 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates ; and 2022 an increase due to volume/weather , as discussed above .
the increase was partially offset by the following : 2022 a decrease of $ 31.9 million in the price applied to unbilled sales , as discussed above ; 2022 a decrease of $ 12.2 million in rate refund provisions , as discussed above ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 5.2 million in gross wholesale revenue due to decreased sales to affiliated systems .
fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs ; and 2022 an increase in the market price of natural gas .
other regulatory credits increased primarily due to : 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 14.3 million of capacity charges related to generation resource planning as allowed by the lpsc ; 2022 the amortization in 2003 of $ 11.8 million of deferred capacity charges , as discussed above ; and 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 11.4 million related to entergy's voluntary severance program , in accordance with a proposed stipulation with the lpsc staff .
2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy louisiana's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .

Table:
	( in millions )
2002 net revenue	$ 922.9
deferred fuel cost revisions	59.1
asset retirement obligation	8.2
volume	-16.2 ( 16.2 )
vidalia settlement	-9.2 ( 9.2 )
other	8.9
2003 net revenue	$ 973.7

Post-table text:
the deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted from a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in december 2002 and a further revision made in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs .
the asset retirement obligation variance was due to the implementation of sfas 143 , "accounting for asset retirement obligations" adopted in january 2003 .
see "critical accounting estimates" for more details on sfas 143 .
the increase was offset by decommissioning expense and had no effect on net income .
the volume variance was due to a decrease in electricity usage in the service territory .
billed usage decreased 1868 gwh in the industrial sector including the loss of a large industrial customer to cogeneration. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
for the chicago headquarters lease , assuming the two options to extend the term are exercised , what is the last year the space can be leased?

Pre-table text:
directors in advance for their review .
in the event the cbot directors determine in their sole discretion that a proposed rule change will materially impair the business of cbot or the business opportunities of the holders of the cbot memberships , such change must be submitted to a committee comprised of three cbot directors and two cme directors ( as defined in our bylaws ) .
in connection with these rights , our ability to take certain actions that we may deem to be in the best interests of the company and its shareholders , including actions relating to the operation of our open outcry trading facilities and certain pricing decisions , may be limited by the rights of our members .
item 1b.unresolved staff comments not applicable .
item 2 .
properties our global headquarters are located in chicago , illinois at 20 south wacker drive .
the following is a description of our key locations and facilities .
location primary use owned/leased lease expiration approximate size ( in square feet ) ( 1 ) 20 south wacker drive , chicago , illinois global headquarters and office space leased 2022 ( 2 ) 490000 141 west jackson chicago , illinois chicago trading floor and office space owned n/a 1500000 ( 3 ) 550 west washington chicago , illinois office space leased 2023 225000 one north end new york , new york new york trading floor and office space mixed ( 4 ) 2069 500000 ( 5 ) 33 cannon street , london office space leased 2019 14000 ( 6 ) one new change , london office space leased 2026 40000 ( 7 ) annex data center chicagoland area business continuity leased 2014 100000 remote data center chicagoland area business continuity leased 2017 50000 data center 3 chicagoland area business continuity and co-location owned n/a 430000 ( 1 ) size represents the amount of space leased by us unless otherwise noted .
( 2 ) the initial lease expires in 2022 with two consecutive options to extend the term for seven and ten years , respectively .
( 3 ) we occupy approximately 425000 square feet of the 141 west jackson complex .
( 4 ) the one north end property is subject to a ground lease with the battery park city authority for the site of our new york offices and trading facility .
in accordance with the terms of the lease , we are deemed to lease the building and its improvements from the landlord .
we do not make lease payments to the landlord related to the building and we receive the financial benefit of the rental income .
( 5 ) we occupy approximately 350000 square feet of the one north end building .
( 6 ) we have a termination right effective in the first quarter of 2012 , which we intend to exercise in the first quarter of 2011 .
( 7 ) we expect to occupy the space at one new change in the second quarter of 2011 .
we also lease global office space around the world and have also partnered with major global telecommunications carriers in connection with our telecommunications hubs whereby we place data cabinets within the carriers 2019 existing secured data centers .
we believe our facilities are adequate for our current operations and that additional space can be obtained if needed .
item 3 .
legal proceedings see 201clegal matters 201d in note 18 .
contingencies to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page 96 for cme group 2019s litigation disclosure which is incorporated herein by reference. .

Table:
location	primary use	owned/leased	lease expiration	approximate size ( in squarefeet ) ( 1 )
20south wacker drive chicagoillinois	global headquarters and office space	leased	2022 ( 2 )	490000
141west jacksonchicago illinois	chicago trading floor and office space	owned	n/a	1500000 ( 3 )
550west washingtonchicago illinois	office space	leased	2023	225000
onenorth endnew york new york	new york trading floor and office space	mixed ( 4 )	2069	500000 ( 5 )
33cannon street london	office space	leased	2019	14000 ( 6 )
onenew change london	office space	leased	2026	40000 ( 7 )
annexdata centerchicagoland area	business continuity	leased	2014	100000
remotedata centerchicagoland area	business continuity	leased	2017	50000
datacenter 3chicagoland area	business continuity and co-location	owned	n/a	430000

Post-table text:
directors in advance for their review .
in the event the cbot directors determine in their sole discretion that a proposed rule change will materially impair the business of cbot or the business opportunities of the holders of the cbot memberships , such change must be submitted to a committee comprised of three cbot directors and two cme directors ( as defined in our bylaws ) .
in connection with these rights , our ability to take certain actions that we may deem to be in the best interests of the company and its shareholders , including actions relating to the operation of our open outcry trading facilities and certain pricing decisions , may be limited by the rights of our members .
item 1b.unresolved staff comments not applicable .
item 2 .
properties our global headquarters are located in chicago , illinois at 20 south wacker drive .
the following is a description of our key locations and facilities .
location primary use owned/leased lease expiration approximate size ( in square feet ) ( 1 ) 20 south wacker drive , chicago , illinois global headquarters and office space leased 2022 ( 2 ) 490000 141 west jackson chicago , illinois chicago trading floor and office space owned n/a 1500000 ( 3 ) 550 west washington chicago , illinois office space leased 2023 225000 one north end new york , new york new york trading floor and office space mixed ( 4 ) 2069 500000 ( 5 ) 33 cannon street , london office space leased 2019 14000 ( 6 ) one new change , london office space leased 2026 40000 ( 7 ) annex data center chicagoland area business continuity leased 2014 100000 remote data center chicagoland area business continuity leased 2017 50000 data center 3 chicagoland area business continuity and co-location owned n/a 430000 ( 1 ) size represents the amount of space leased by us unless otherwise noted .
( 2 ) the initial lease expires in 2022 with two consecutive options to extend the term for seven and ten years , respectively .
( 3 ) we occupy approximately 425000 square feet of the 141 west jackson complex .
( 4 ) the one north end property is subject to a ground lease with the battery park city authority for the site of our new york offices and trading facility .
in accordance with the terms of the lease , we are deemed to lease the building and its improvements from the landlord .
we do not make lease payments to the landlord related to the building and we receive the financial benefit of the rental income .
( 5 ) we occupy approximately 350000 square feet of the one north end building .
( 6 ) we have a termination right effective in the first quarter of 2012 , which we intend to exercise in the first quarter of 2011 .
( 7 ) we expect to occupy the space at one new change in the second quarter of 2011 .
we also lease global office space around the world and have also partnered with major global telecommunications carriers in connection with our telecommunications hubs whereby we place data cabinets within the carriers 2019 existing secured data centers .
we believe our facilities are adequate for our current operations and that additional space can be obtained if needed .
item 3 .
legal proceedings see 201clegal matters 201d in note 18 .
contingencies to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page 96 for cme group 2019s litigation disclosure which is incorporated herein by reference. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
at december 31 , 2013 what was the percent of square feet of our office in alpharetta , georgia not leased

Pre-table text:
our ability to restructure or refinance our debt will depend on the condition of the capital markets and our financial condition at such time .
any refinancing of our debt could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants , which could further restrict our business operations .
in addition , any failure to make payments of interest and principal on our outstanding indebtedness on a timely basis would likely result in a reduction of our credit rating , which could harm our ability to incur additional indebtedness .
if our cash flows and available cash are insufficient to meet our debt service obligations , we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations .
we may not be able to consummate those dispositions or to obtain the proceeds that we could realize from them , and these proceeds may not be adequate to meet any debt service obligations then due .
item 1b .
unresolved staff comments item 2 .
properties a summary of our significant locations at december 31 , 2013 is shown in the following table .
all facilities are leased , except for 165000 square feet of our office in alpharetta , georgia .
square footage amounts are net of space that has been sublet or part of a facility restructuring. .

Table:
location	approximate square footage
alpharetta georgia	254000
jersey city new jersey	107000
arlington virginia	102000
sandy utah	66000
menlo park california	63000
new york new york	39000
chicago illinois ( 1 )	36000

Post-table text:
chicago , illinois ( 1 ) 36000 ( 1 ) includes approximately 25000 square footage related to g1 execution services , llc .
we entered into a definitive agreement to sell g1 execution services , llc to an affiliate of susquehanna .
the lease was assigned to susquehanna upon closing of the sale on february 10 , all of our facilities are used by either our trading and investing or balance sheet management segments , in addition to the corporate/other category .
all other leased facilities with space of less than 25000 square feet are not listed by location .
in addition to the significant facilities above , we also lease all 30 e*trade branches , ranging in space from approximately 2500 to 8000 square feet .
we believe our facilities space is adequate to meet our needs in 2014 .
item 3 .
legal proceedings on october 27 , 2000 , ajaxo , inc .
( 201cajaxo 201d ) filed a complaint in the superior court for the state of california , county of santa clara .
ajaxo sought damages and certain non-monetary relief for the company 2019s alleged breach of a non-disclosure agreement with ajaxo pertaining to certain wireless technology that ajaxo offered the company as well as damages and other relief against the company for their alleged misappropriation of ajaxo 2019s trade secrets .
following a jury trial , a judgment was entered in 2003 in favor of ajaxo against the company for $ 1.3 million for breach of the ajaxo non-disclosure agreement .
although the jury found in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets , the trial court subsequently denied ajaxo 2019s requests for additional damages and relief .
on december 21 , 2005 , the california court of appeal affirmed the above-described award against the company for breach of the nondisclosure agreement but remanded the case to the trial court for the limited purpose of determining what , if any , additional damages ajaxo may be entitled to as a result of the jury 2019s previous finding in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets .
although the company paid ajaxo the full amount due on the above-described judgment , the case was remanded back to the trial court , and on may 30 , 2008 , a jury returned a .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage change in capital expenditures for property , plant and equipment from 2009 to 2010?

Pre-table text:
( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 .

Table:
( in millions )	2010	2009	2008
net cash provided by operating activities	$ 3547	$ 3173	$ 4421
net cash used for investing activities	-319 ( 319 )	-1518 ( 1518 )	-907 ( 907 )
net cash used for financing activities	-3363 ( 3363 )	-1476 ( 1476 )	-3938 ( 3938 )

Post-table text:
operating activities net cash provided by operating activities increased by $ 374 million to $ 3547 million in 2010 as compared to 2009 .
the increase primarily was attributable to an improvement in our operating working capital balances of $ 570 million as discussed below , and $ 187 million related to lower net income tax payments , as compared to 2009 .
partially offsetting these improvements was a net reduction in cash from operations of $ 350 million related to our defined benefit pension plan .
this reduction was the result of increased contributions to the pension trust of $ 758 million as compared to 2009 , partially offset by an increase in the cas costs recovered on our contracts .
operating working capital accounts consists of receivables , inventories , accounts payable , and customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred .
the improvement in cash provided by operating working capital was due to a decline in 2010 accounts receivable balances compared to 2009 , and an increase in 2010 customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred balances compared to 2009 .
these improvements partially were offset by a decline in accounts payable balances in 2010 compared to 2009 .
the decline in accounts receivable primarily was due to higher collections on various programs at electronic systems , is&gs , and space systems business areas .
the increase in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred primarily was attributable to an increase on government and commercial satellite programs at space systems and air mobility programs at aeronautics , partially offset by a decrease on various programs at electronic systems .
the decrease in accounts payable was attributable to the timing of accounts payable activities across all segments .
net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $ 1248 million to $ 3173 million in 2009 as compared to 2008 .
the decline primarily was attributable to an increase in our contributions to the defined benefit pension plan of $ 1373 million as compared to 2008 and an increase in our operating working capital accounts of $ 147 million .
partially offsetting these items was the impact of lower net income tax payments in 2009 as compared to 2008 in the amount of $ 319 million .
the decline in cash provided by operating working capital primarily was due to growth of receivables on various programs in the ms2 and gt&l lines of business at electronic systems and an increase in inventories on combat aircraft programs at aeronautics , which partially were offset by increases in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred on government satellite programs at space systems and the timing of accounts payable activities .
investing activities capital expenditures 2013 the majority of our capital expenditures relate to facilities infrastructure and equipment that are incurred to support new and existing programs across all of our business segments .
we also incur capital expenditures for it to support programs and general enterprise it infrastructure .
capital expenditures for property , plant and equipment amounted to $ 820 million in 2010 , $ 852 million in 2009 , and $ 926 million in 2008 .
we expect that our operating cash flows will continue to be sufficient to fund our annual capital expenditures over the next few years .
acquisitions , divestitures and other activities 2013 acquisition activities include both the acquisition of businesses and investments in affiliates .
amounts paid in 2010 of $ 148 million primarily related to investments in affiliates .
we paid $ 435 million in 2009 for acquisition activities , compared with $ 233 million in 2008 .
in 2010 , we received proceeds of $ 798 million from the sale of eig , net of $ 17 million in transaction costs ( see note 2 ) .
there were no material divestiture activities in 2009 and 2008 .
during 2010 , we increased our short-term investments by $ 171 million compared to an increase of $ 279 million in 2009 .
financing activities share activity and dividends 2013 during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , we repurchased 33.0 million , 24.9 million , and 29.0 million shares of our common stock for $ 2483 million , $ 1851 million , and $ 2931 million .
of the shares we repurchased in 2010 , 0.9 million shares for $ 63 million were repurchased in december but settled and were paid for in january 2011 .
in october 2010 , our board of directors approved a new share repurchase program for the repurchase of our common stock from time-to-time , up to an authorized amount of $ 3.0 billion ( see note 12 ) .
under the program , we have discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation .
we repurchased a total of 11.2 million shares under the program for $ 776 million , and as of december 31 , 2010 , there remained $ 2224 million available for additional share repurchases .
in connection with their approval of the new share repurchase program , our board terminated our previous share repurchase program .
cash received from the issuance of our common stock in connection with stock option exercises during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 totaled $ 59 million , $ 40 million , and $ 250 million .
those activities resulted in the issuance of 1.4 million shares , 1.0 million shares , and 4.7 million shares during the respective periods. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage growth in the stock price performance for tractor supply company from 2012 to 2013

Pre-table text:
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act .
the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 29 , 2012 to december 30 , 2017 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period .
the comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 29 , 2012 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends .
the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .

Table:
	12/29/2012	12/28/2013	12/27/2014	12/26/2015	12/31/2016	12/30/2017
tractor supply company	$ 100.00	$ 174.14	$ 181.29	$ 201.04	$ 179.94	$ 180.52
s&p 500	$ 100.00	$ 134.11	$ 155.24	$ 156.43	$ 173.74	$ 211.67
s&p retail index	$ 100.00	$ 147.73	$ 164.24	$ 207.15	$ 219.43	$ 286.13

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the ratio of the total loss due to instrument-specific credit risk for 2008 to 2007

Pre-table text:
the notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $ 1.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .
the amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .
these items have been classified appropriately in trading account assets or trading account liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet .
changes in fair value of these items are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
other items for which the fair-value option was selected in accordance with sfas 159 the company has elected the fair-value option for the following eligible items , which did not affect opening retained earnings : 2022 certain credit products ; 2022 certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity-method investments ; 2022 certain structured liabilities ; 2022 certain non-structured liabilities ; and 2022 certain mortgage loans certain credit products citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain originated and purchased loans , including certain unfunded loan products , such as guarantees and letters of credit , executed by citigroup 2019s trading businesses .
none of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment .
significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term , or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party .
citigroup has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications .
fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the company , including where those management objectives would not be met .
the following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value: .

Table:
in millions of dollars	2008 trading assets	2008 loans	2008 trading assets	loans
carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet	$ 16254	$ 2315	$ 26020	$ 3038
aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value	$ 6501	$ 3	$ 899	$ -5 ( 5 )
balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due	$ 77	$ 1113	$ 186	$ 1292
aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue	$ 190	$ -4 ( 4 )	$ 68	$ 2014

Post-table text:
in millions of dollars trading assets loans trading assets loans carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 16254 $ 2315 $ 26020 $ 3038 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value $ 6501 $ 3 $ 899 $ ( 5 ) balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 77 $ 1113 $ 186 $ 1292 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 190 $ ( 4 ) $ 68 $ 2014 in addition to the amounts reported above , $ 72 million and $ 141 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-value accounting were outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively .
changes in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loans depending on their balance sheet classifications .
the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 38 million and $ 188 million , respectively .
certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation .
the company has elected the fair-value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in our investment companies , which are reported at fair value .
the fair-value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments .
as required by sfas 159 , all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value .
these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .
citigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for under the equity method .
the company elected fair-value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity .
since the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value , the impact of applying the equity method to citigroup 2019s investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-value accounting .
thus , this fair-value election had no impact on opening retained earnings .
these investments are classified as other assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .
changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
certain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) .
the company elected the fair- value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis .
these positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form .
for those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 277 million as of december 31 , 2008 and $ 7 million as of december 31 , 2007 .
the change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement .
certain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the increase observed in the balance at the end of the year during 2005 and 2004?

Pre-table text:
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2005 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization .

Table:
balance december 31 2002	$ 450697000
additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense	68125000
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property	-4645000 ( 4645000 )
balance december 31 2003	514177000
additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense	82551000
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property	-1390000 ( 1390000 )
balance december 31 2004	595338000
additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense	83656000
deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property	-15244000 ( 15244000 )
balance december 31 2005	$ 663750000

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
as of december 31 , what was percent of the capital markets goodwill to the total

Pre-table text:
judgments the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets depends on a number of factors , including estimates of future market growth and trends , forecasted revenue and costs , expected useful lives of the assets , appropriate discount rates and other variables .
goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments .
each of these reporting units is tested for impairment individually during the annual evaluation .
there is no goodwill assigned to reporting units within the balance sheet management segment .
the following table shows the amount of goodwill allocated to each of the reporting units in the trading and investing segment ( dollars in millions ) : .

Table:
reporting unit	december 31 2011
u.s . brokerage	$ 1751.2
capital markets	142.4
retail bank	40.6
total goodwill	$ 1934.2

Post-table text:
in connection with our annual impairment test of goodwill , we concluded that the goodwill was not impaired as the fair value of the reporting units was in excess of the book value of those reporting units as of december 31 , 2011 .
the fair value of the reporting units exceeded the book value of those reporting units by substantial amounts ( fair value as a percent of book value ranged from approximately 150% ( 150 % ) to 700% ( 700 % ) ) and therefore did not indicate a significant risk of goodwill impairment based on current projections and valuations .
we also evaluate the remaining useful lives on intangible assets each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization .
effects if actual results differ if our estimates of fair value for the reporting units change due to changes in our business or other factors , we may determine that an impairment charge is necessary .
estimates of fair value are determined based on a complex model using cash flows and company comparisons .
if management 2019s estimates of future cash flows are inaccurate , the fair value determined could be inaccurate and impairment would not be recognized in a timely manner .
intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives .
if changes in the estimated underlying revenue occur , impairment or a change in the remaining life may need to be recognized. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
as of as of december 31 , 2007 what was the percent of the total debt maturities that was due in 2009

Pre-table text:
debt maturities 2013 the following table presents aggregate debt maturities as of december 31 , 2007 , excluding market value adjustments .
millions of dollars .

Table:
2008	$ 689
2009	542
2010	462
2011	550
2012	720
thereafter	4717
total debt	$ 7680

Post-table text:
at december 31 , 2007 , we reclassified as long-term debt approximately $ 550 million of debt due within one year that we intend to refinance .
this reclassification reflected our ability and intent to refinance any short- term borrowings and certain current maturities of long-term debt on a long-term basis .
at december 31 , 2006 , we did not reclassify any short-term debt as long-term debt as we did not intend to refinance at that mortgaged properties 2013 equipment with a carrying value of approximately $ 2.8 billion at both december 31 , 2007 and 2006 serves as collateral for capital leases and other types of equipment obligations in accordance with the secured financing arrangements utilized to acquire such railroad equipment .
as a result of the merger of missouri pacific railroad company ( mprr ) with and into uprr on january 1 , 1997 , and pursuant to the underlying indentures for the mprr mortgage bonds , uprr must maintain the same value of assets after the merger in order to comply with the security requirements of the mortgage bonds .
as of the merger date , the value of the mprr assets that secured the mortgage bonds was approximately $ 6.0 billion .
in accordance with the terms of the indentures , this collateral value must be maintained during the entire term of the mortgage bonds irrespective of the outstanding balance of such bonds .
credit facilities 2013 on december 31 , 2007 , $ 1.9 billion of credit was available under our revolving credit facility ( the facility ) , which we entered into on april 20 , 2007 .
the facility is designated for general corporate purposes and supports the issuance of commercial paper .
we did not draw on the facility during 2007 .
commitment fees and interest rates payable under the facility are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated , investment-grade borrowers .
the facility allows for borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates , plus a spread , depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings .
the facility requires the maintenance of a debt to net worth coverage ratio .
at december 31 , 2007 , we were in compliance with this covenant .
the facility does not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require us to post collateral .
the facility , which expires in april 2012 , replaced two $ 1 billion , 5-year facilities with terms ending in march 2009 and march 2010 .
the facility includes terms that are comparable with those of the prior facilities , although the minimum net worth requirement of $ 7.5 billion in prior facilities was removed , and the facility includes a change-of-control provision .
in addition to our revolving credit facility , a $ 75 million uncommitted line of credit was available .
the line of credit expires in april 2008 , and was not used in 2007 .
we must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facility to draw on this $ 75 million line .
dividend restrictions 2013 our revolving credit facility includes a debt-to-net worth covenant that , under certain circumstances , would restrict the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders .
the amount of retained earnings available for dividends was $ 11.5 billion and $ 7.8 billion at december 31 , 2007 and december 31 , 2006 , respectively .
this facility replaced two credit facilities that had minimum net worth covenants that were more restrictive with respect to the amount of retained earnings available for dividends at december 31 , 2006. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) and annual cash sinking fund requirements for debt outstanding from 2005 to 2004?

Pre-table text:
entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( d ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on october 1 , 2003 and will then be remarketed .
( e ) on june 1 , 2002 , entergy louisiana remarketed $ 55 million st .
charles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030 , resetting the interest rate to 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) through may 2005 .
( f ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1 , 2005 and will then be remarketed .
( g ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year .
it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms .
the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) and annual cash sinking fund requirements for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2002 , for the next five years are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
2003	$ 1150786
2004	$ 925005
2005	$ 540372
2006	$ 139952
2007	$ 475288

Post-table text:
not included are other sinking fund requirements of approximately $ 30.2 million annually , which may be satisfied by cash or by certification of property additions at the rate of 167% ( 167 % ) of such requirements .
in december 2002 , when the damhead creek project was sold , the buyer of the project assumed all obligations under the damhead creek credit facilities and the damhead creek interest rate swap agreements .
in november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .
entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .
these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .
in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .
this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .
covenants in the entergy corporation 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization .
if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other credit facilities or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the facility's maturity may occur .
in january 2003 , entergy paid in full , at maturity , the outstanding debt relating to the top of iowa wind project .
capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : fffd maintain system energy's equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short-term debt ) ; fffd permit the continued commercial operation of grand gulf 1 ; fffd pay in full all system energy indebtedness for borrowed money when due ; and fffd enable system energy to make payments on specific system energy debt , under supplements to the agreement assigning system energy's rights in the agreement as security for the specific debt. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the growth rate of maximum exposure to loss from vies from 2016 to 2017?

Pre-table text:
64 | 2017 form 10-k notes to consolidated financial statements 1 .
operations and summary of significant accounting policies a .
nature of operations information in our financial statements and related commentary are presented in the following categories : machinery , energy & transportation ( me&t ) 2013 represents the aggregate total of construction industries , resource industries , energy & transportation and all other operating segments and related corporate items and eliminations .
financial products 2013 primarily includes the company 2019s financial products segment .
this category includes caterpillar financial services corporation ( cat financial ) , caterpillar insurance holdings inc .
( insurance services ) and their respective subsidiaries .
our products are sold primarily under the brands 201ccaterpillar , 201d 201ccat , 201d design versions of 201ccat 201d and 201ccaterpillar , 201d 201cemd , 201d 201cfg wilson , 201d 201cmak , 201d 201cmwm , 201d 201cperkins , 201d 201cprogress rail , 201d 201csem 201d and 201csolar turbines 201d .
we conduct operations in our machinery , energy & transportation lines of business under highly competitive conditions , including intense price competition .
we place great emphasis on the high quality and performance of our products and our dealers 2019 service support .
although no one competitor is believed to produce all of the same types of equipment that we do , there are numerous companies , large and small , which compete with us in the sale of each of our products .
our machines are distributed principally through a worldwide organization of dealers ( dealer network ) , 48 located in the united states and 123 located outside the united states , serving 192 countries .
reciprocating engines are sold principally through the dealer network and to other manufacturers for use in products .
some of the reciprocating engines manufactured by our subsidiary perkins engines company limited , are also sold through its worldwide network of 93 distributors covering 182 countries .
the fg wilson branded electric power generation systems primarily manufactured by our subsidiary caterpillar northern ireland limited are sold through its worldwide network of 154 distributors covering 131 countries .
some of the large , medium speed reciprocating engines are also sold a0 under the mak brand through a worldwide network of 20 distributors covering 130 countries .
our dealers do not deal exclusively with our products ; however , in most cases sales and servicing of our products are the dealers 2019 principal business .
some products , primarily turbines and locomotives , are sold directly to end customers through sales forces employed by the company .
at times , these employees are assisted by independent sales representatives .
the financial products line of business also conducts operations under highly competitive conditions .
financing for users of caterpillar products is available through a variety of competitive sources , principally commercial banks and finance and leasing companies .
we offer various financing plans designed to increase the opportunity for sales of our products and generate financing income for our company .
a significant portion of financial products activity is conducted in north america , with additional offices in latin america , asia/pacific , europe , africa and middle east .
b .
basis of presentation the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of caterpillar a0 inc .
and its subsidiaries where we have a controlling financial interest .
investments in companies where our ownership exceeds 20 percent and we do not have a controlling interest or where the ownership is less than 20 percent and for which we have a significant influence are accounted for by the equity method .
see note 9 for further discussion .
we consolidate all variable interest entities ( vies ) where caterpillar inc .
is the primary beneficiary .
for vies , we assess whether we are the primary beneficiary as prescribed by the accounting guidance on the consolidation of vies .
the primary beneficiary of a vie is the party that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity 2019s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the vie .
see note 21 for further discussion on a consolidated vie .
we have affiliates , suppliers and dealers that are vies of which we are not the primary beneficiary .
although we have provided financial support , we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of each entity .
our maximum exposure to loss from vies for which we are not the primary beneficiary was as follows: .

Table:
( millions of dollars )	december 31 , 2017	december 31 , 2016
receivables - trade and other	$ 34	$ 55
receivables - finance	42	174
long-term receivables - finance	38	246
investments in unconsolidated affiliated companies	39	31
guarantees	259	210
total	$ 412	$ 716

Post-table text:
in addition , cat financial has end-user customers that are vies of which we are not the primary beneficiary .
although we have provided financial support to these entities and therefore have a variable interest , we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact their economic performance .
our maximum exposure to loss from our involvement with these vies is limited to the credit risk inherently present in the financial support that we have provided .
these risks are evaluated and reflected in our financial statements as part of our overall portfolio of finance receivables and related allowance for credit losses. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percent of the receivable balances in puerto rico as of december 31 , 2017 was current?

Pre-table text:
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 was dispatched starting in february 2018 .
aes puerto rico continues to be the lowest cost and epa compliant energy provider in puerto rico .
therefore , we expect aes puerto rico to continue to be a critical supplier to prepa .
starting prior to the hurricanes , prepa has been facing economic challenges that could impact the company , and on july 2 , 2017 , filed for bankruptcy under title iii .
as a result of the bankruptcy filing , aes puerto rico and aes ilumina 2019s non-recourse debt of $ 365 million and $ 36 million , respectively , is in default and has been classified as current as of december 31 , 2017 .
in november 2017 , aes puerto rico signed a forbearance and standstill agreement with its lenders to prevent the lenders from taking any action against the company due to the default events .
this agreement will expire on march 22 , 2018 .
the company's receivable balances in puerto rico as of december 31 , 2017 totaled $ 86 million , of which $ 53 million was overdue .
after the filing of title iii protection , and up until the disruption caused by the hurricanes , aes in puerto rico was collecting the overdue amounts from prepa in line with historic payment patterns .
considering the information available as of the filing date , management believes the carrying amount of our assets in puerto rico of $ 627 million is recoverable as of december 31 , 2017 and no reserve on the receivables is required .
foreign currency risks 2014 aes operates businesses in many foreign countries and such operations could be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates .
fluctuations in currency exchange rate between u.s .
dollar and the following currencies could create significant fluctuations in earnings and cash flows : the argentine peso , the brazilian real , the dominican republic peso , the euro , the chilean peso , the colombian peso , and the philippine peso .
concentrations 2014 due to the geographical diversity of its operations , the company does not have any significant concentration of customers or sources of fuel supply .
several of the company's generation businesses rely on ppas with one or a limited number of customers for the majority of , and in some cases all of , the relevant businesses' output over the term of the ppas .
however , no single customer accounted for 10% ( 10 % ) or more of total revenue in 2017 , 2016 or 2015 .
the cash flows and results of operations of our businesses depend on the credit quality of our customers and the continued ability of our customers and suppliers to meet their obligations under ppas and fuel supply agreements .
if a substantial portion of the company's long-term ppas and/or fuel supply were modified or terminated , the company would be adversely affected to the extent that it would be unable to replace such contracts at equally favorable terms .
26 .
related party transactions certain of our businesses in panama and the dominican republic are partially owned by governments either directly or through state-owned institutions .
in the ordinary course of business , these businesses enter into energy purchase and sale transactions , and transmission agreements with other state-owned institutions which are controlled by such governments .
at two of our generation businesses in mexico , the offtakers exercise significant influence , but not control , through representation on these businesses' boards of directors .
these offtakers are also required to hold a nominal ownership interest in such businesses .
in chile , we provide capacity and energy under contractual arrangements to our investment which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting .
additionally , the company provides certain support and management services to several of its affiliates under various agreements .
the company's consolidated statements of operations included the following transactions with related parties for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

Table:
years ended december 31,	2017	2016	2015
revenue 2014non-regulated	$ 1297	$ 1100	$ 1099
cost of sales 2014non-regulated	220	210	330
interest income	8	4	25
interest expense	36	39	33

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what portion of total backlog is related to newport news segment?

Pre-table text:
uss abraham lincoln rcoh , the construction preparation contract for cvn-79 john f .
kennedy and the inactivation contract for cvn-65 uss enterprise , partially offset by lower volumes on the execution contract for the cvn-71 uss theodore roosevelt rcoh and the construction and engineering contracts for cvn-78 gerald r .
ford .
higher revenues in fleet support services were primarily the result of volumes associated with repair work on ssn-765 uss montpelier .
increased submarines revenues were related to the ssn-774 virginia-class submarine program , primarily driven by higher volumes on block iii boats and the advance procurement contract on block iv boats , partially offset by lower volumes on block ii boats following the delivery of ssn-783 uss minnesota .
segment operating income 2014 - newport news operating income in 2014 was $ 415 million , compared to income of $ 402 million in 2013 .
the increase was primarily related to the volume changes discussed above and higher risk retirement on the construction contract for cvn-78 gerald r .
ford , offset by lower risk retirement on the cvn-71 uss theodore roosevelt rcoh .
2013 - newport news operating income in 2013 was $ 402 million , compared to income of $ 372 million in 2012 .
the increase was primarily related to the ssn-774 virginia-class submarine program , driven by risk retirement , performance improvement and the favorable resolution of outstanding contract changes , as well as risk retirement on the execution contract for the cvn-71 uss theodore roosevelt rcoh and the absence in 2013 of the workers' compensation expense adjustment recorded in 2012 , partially offset by the favorable resolution in 2012 of outstanding contract changes on the cvn-65 uss enterprise edsra .
revenues at our other segment for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , were $ 137 million , primarily due to the acquisition of upi on may 30 , 2014 .
other operating loss for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , was $ 59 million , primarily due to the goodwill impairment charge of $ 47 million described above .
backlog total backlog as of december 31 , 2014 , was approximately $ 21 billion .
total backlog includes both funded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is contractually obligated by the customer ) and unfunded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is not currently contractually obligated by the customer ) .
backlog excludes unexercised contract options and unfunded indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity orders .
for contracts having no stated contract values , backlog includes only the amounts committed by the customer .
the following table presents funded and unfunded backlog by segment as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013: .

Table:
( $ in millions )	december 31 2014 funded	december 31 2014 unfunded	december 31 2014 total backlog	december 31 2014 funded	december 31 2014 unfunded	total backlog
ingalls	$ 5609	$ 1889	$ 7498	$ 6335	$ 2570	$ 8905
newport news	6158	7709	13867	5495	3638	9133
other	65	2014	65	2014	2014	2014
total backlog	$ 11832	$ 9598	$ 21430	$ 11830	$ 6208	$ 18038

Post-table text:
we expect approximately 28% ( 28 % ) of the $ 21 billion total backlog as of december 31 , 2014 , to be converted into sales in 2015 .
u.s .
government orders comprised substantially all of the backlog as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 .
awards 2014 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2014 , was approximately $ 10.1 billion .
significant new awards in 2014 included contracts for block iv of the ssn-774 virginia-class submarine program , continued construction preparation for cvn-79 john f .
kennedy and construction of nsc-7 kimball .
2013 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , was approximately $ 9.4 billion .
significant new awards in 2013 included contracts for the construction of five ddg-51 arleigh burke-class this proof is printed at 96% ( 96 % ) of original size this line represents final trim and will not print .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}