[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the tax expense related to discontinued operations in 2013?

Pre-table text:
dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued 9 .
acquisitions dbsd north america and terrestar transactions on march 2 , 2012 , the fcc approved the transfer of 40 mhz of aws-4 wireless spectrum licenses held by dbsd north america and terrestar to us .
on march 9 , 2012 , we completed the dbsd transaction and the terrestar transaction , pursuant to which we acquired , among other things , certain satellite assets and wireless spectrum licenses held by dbsd north america and terrestar .
in addition , during the fourth quarter 2011 , we and sprint entered into a mutual release and settlement agreement ( the 201csprint settlement agreement 201d ) pursuant to which all issues then being disputed relating to the dbsd transaction and the terrestar transaction were resolved between us and sprint , including , but not limited to , issues relating to costs allegedly incurred by sprint to relocate users from the spectrum then licensed to dbsd north america and terrestar .
the total consideration to acquire the dbsd north america and terrestar assets was approximately $ 2.860 billion .
this amount includes $ 1.364 billion for the dbsd transaction , $ 1.382 billion for the terrestar transaction , and the net payment of $ 114 million to sprint pursuant to the sprint settlement agreement .
see note 16 for further information .
as a result of these acquisitions , we recognized the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based on our estimates of fair value at their acquisition date , including $ 102 million in an uncertain tax position in 201clong-term deferred revenue , distribution and carriage payments and other long-term liabilities 201d on our consolidated balance sheets .
subsequently , in the third quarter 2013 , this uncertain tax position was resolved and $ 102 million was reversed and recorded as a decrease in 201cincome tax ( provision ) benefit , net 201d on our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) for the year ended december 31 , 2013 .
10 .
discontinued operations as of december 31 , 2013 , blockbuster had ceased all material operations .
accordingly , our consolidated balance sheets , consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) and consolidated statements of cash flows have been recast to present blockbuster as discontinued operations for all periods presented and the amounts presented in the notes to our consolidated financial statements relate only to our continuing operations , unless otherwise noted .
during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the revenue from our discontinued operations was $ 503 million , $ 1.085 billion and $ 974 million , respectively .
201cincome ( loss ) from discontinued operations , before income taxes 201d for the same periods was a loss of $ 54 million , $ 62 million and $ 3 million , respectively .
in addition , 201cincome ( loss ) from discontinued operations , net of tax 201d for the same periods was a loss of $ 47 million , $ 37 million and $ 7 million , respectively .
as of december 31 , 2013 , the net assets from our discontinued operations consisted of the following : december 31 , 2013 ( in thousands ) .

Table:
	as of december 31 2013 ( in thousands )
current assets from discontinued operations	$ 68239
noncurrent assets from discontinued operations	9965
current liabilities from discontinued operations	-49471 ( 49471 )
long-term liabilities from discontinued operations	-19804 ( 19804 )
net assets from discontinued operations	$ 8929

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the difference in percentage return for pmi common stock compared to the s&p 500 index for the five years ended 2018?

Pre-table text:
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .
the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .
date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

Table:
date	pmi	pmi peer group ( 1 )	s&p 500 index
december 31 2013	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
december 31 2014	$ 97.90	$ 107.80	$ 113.70
december 31 2015	$ 111.00	$ 116.80	$ 115.30
december 31 2016	$ 120.50	$ 118.40	$ 129.00
december 31 2017	$ 144.50	$ 140.50	$ 157.20
december 31 2018	$ 96.50	$ 127.70	$ 150.30

Post-table text:
( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year .
the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .
the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .
as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .
note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the change in inventories net in millions between 2002 and 2003?

Pre-table text:
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .
a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .
an impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .
federal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .
operating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .
period and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .
the unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .
respective years or of future results .
the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .
periods benefited , typically five years .
for approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .
the company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .
share .
the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .
new capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .
the pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .
( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .
each the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .
receive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .
inventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .
the net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .

Table:
	2003	2002
finished goods	$ 384.3	$ 206.7
raw materials and work in progress	90.8	50.9
inventory step-up	52.6	2013
inventories net	$ 527.7	$ 257.6

Post-table text:
made by zimmer to implex pursuant to their existing alliance raw materials and work in progress 90.8 50.9 arrangement , escrow and other items .
the acquisition will be inventory step-up 52.6 2013 accounted for under the purchase method of accounting .
inventories , net $ 527.7 $ 257.6 reserves for obsolete and slow-moving inventory at4 .
change in accounting principle december 31 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 47.4 million and instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic $ 45.5 million , respectively .
provisions charged to expense surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical were $ 11.6 million , $ 6.0 million and $ 11.9 million for the procedures .
effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .
recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , amounts written off against the reserve were $ 11.7 million , plant and equipment .
undeployed instruments are carried at $ 7.1 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .
instruments in the december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .
field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .
following the acquisition of centerpulse , the company depreciation is computed using the straight-line method established a common approach for estimating excess based on average estimated useful lives , determined inventory and instruments .
this change in estimate resulted principally in reference to associated product life cycles , in a charge to earnings of $ 3.0 million after tax in the fourth primarily five years .
in accordance with sfas no .
144 , the quarter .
company reviews instruments for impairment whenever .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the average number of weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2011 to 2013

Pre-table text:
note 2 2013 restructuring charges 2013 actions during 2013 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 201 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 83 million , $ 37 million , and $ 81 million related to our information systems & global solutions ( is&gs ) , mission systems and training ( mst ) , and space systems business segments .
these charges reduced our net earnings by $ 130 million ( $ .40 per share ) and primarily related to a plan we committed to in november 2013 to close and consolidate certain facilities and reduce our total workforce by approximately 4000 positions within our is&gs , mst , and space systems business segments .
these charges also include $ 30 million related to certain severance actions at our is&gs business segment that occurred in the first quarter of 2013 , which were subsequently paid in 2013 .
the november 2013 plan resulted from a strategic review of these businesses 2019 facility capacity and future workload projections and is intended to better align our organization and cost structure and improve the affordability of our products and services given the continued decline in u.s .
government spending as well as the rapidly changing competitive and economic landscape .
upon separation , terminated employees will receive lump-sum severance payments primarily based on years of service .
during 2013 , we paid approximately $ 15 million in severance payments associated with these actions , with the remainder expected to be paid through the middle of 2015 .
in addition to the severance charges described above , we expect to incur accelerated and incremental costs ( e.g. , accelerated depreciation expense related to long-lived assets at the sites to be closed , relocation of equipment and other employee related costs ) of approximately $ 15 million , $ 50 million , and $ 135 million at our is&gs , mst , and space systems business segments related to the facility closures and consolidations .
the accelerated and incremental costs will be expensed as incurred in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations through their completion in 2015 .
we expect to recover a substantial amount of the restructuring charges through the pricing of our products and services to the u.s .
government and other customers in future periods , with the impact included in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations .
2012 and 2011 actions during 2012 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 48 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 25 million related to our aeronautics business segment and $ 23 million related to the reorganization of our former electronic systems business segment .
these charges reduced our net earnings by $ 31 million ( $ .09 per share ) and consisted of severance costs associated with the elimination of certain positions through either voluntary or involuntary actions .
these severance actions resulted from cost reduction initiatives to better align our organization with changing economic conditions .
upon separation , terminated employees received lump-sum severance payments primarily based on years of service , all of which were paid in 2013 .
during 2011 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 136 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 49 million , $ 48 million , and $ 39 million related to our aeronautics , space systems , and our is&gs business segments and corporate headquarters .
these charges reduced our net earnings by $ 88 million ( $ .26 per share ) and consisted of severance costs associated with the elimination of certain positions through either voluntary or involuntary actions .
these severance actions resulted from a strategic review of these businesses and our corporate headquarters and are intended to better align our organization and cost structure with changing economic conditions .
the workforce reductions at the business segments also reflected changes in program lifecycles , where several of our major programs were either transitioning out of development and into production or were ending .
upon separation , terminated employees received lump-sum severance payments based on years of service .
during 2011 , we made approximately half of the severance payments associated with these 2011 severance actions , and paid the remaining amounts in 2012 .
note 3 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2013	2012	2011
weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations	320.9	323.7	335.9
weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards	5.6	4.7	4.0
weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations	326.5	328.4	339.9

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what amount of long-term debt due in the next 24 months as of december 31 , 2003 , in millions?

Pre-table text:
entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , certain series of which are secured by non-interest bearing first mortgage bonds .
( b ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1 , 2005 and can then be remarketed .
( c ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1 , 2004 and can then be remarketed .
( d ) the bonds had a mandatory tender date of october 1 , 2003 .
entergy louisiana purchased the bonds from the holders , pursuant to the mandatory tender provision , and has not remarketed the bonds at this time .
entergy louisiana used a combination of cash on hand and short-term borrowing to buy-in the bonds .
( e ) on june 1 , 2002 , entergy louisiana remarketed $ 55 million st .
charles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030 , resetting the interest rate to 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) through may 2005 .
( f ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1 , 2005 and can then be remarketed .
( g ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy's nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .
the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .
entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( h ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year .
it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms .
the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2003 , for the next five years are as follows: .

Table:
	( in thousands )
2004	$ 503215
2005	$ 462420
2006	$ 75896
2007	$ 624539
2008	$ 941625

Post-table text:
in november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .
entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .
these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .
in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .
this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 , and is included in the note payable to nypa balance above .
in july 2003 , a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa .
under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the domestic utility companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .
covenants in the entergy corporation notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization .
if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other indebtedness or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the notes' maturity dates may occur. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
for the quarter ended march 312008 what was the percent of the change from the highest to the lowest of the company per share sale prices of common stock

Pre-table text:
part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2008 and 2007. .

Table:
2008	high	low
quarter ended march 31	$ 42.72	$ 32.10
quarter ended june 30	46.10	38.53
quarter ended september 30	43.43	31.89
quarter ended december 31	37.28	19.35
2007	high	low
quarter ended march 31	$ 41.31	$ 36.63
quarter ended june 30	43.84	37.64
quarter ended september 30	45.45	36.34
quarter ended december 31	46.53	40.08

Post-table text:
on february 13 , 2009 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 28.85 per share as reported on the nyse .
as of february 13 , 2009 , we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders .
dividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock .
we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business .
the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants .
the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan , and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied .
in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction .
for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the average price of shares repurchased in 2010?

Pre-table text:
investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 44 million , or 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , to $ 477.8 million in 2009 .
average assets in these portfolios were $ 129.5 billion during 2009 , down $ 12.6 billion or 9% ( 9 % ) from 2008 .
other investment portfolio assets under management increased $ 46.7 billion during 2009 , including $ 36.5 billion in market gains and income and $ 10.2 billion of net inflows , primarily from institutional investors .
net inflows include $ 1.3 billion transferred from the stock and blended asset mutual funds during 2009 .
administrative fees decreased $ 35 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 319 million in 2009 .
this change includes a $ 4 million decrease in 12b-1 distribution and service fees recognized on lower average assets under management in the advisor and r classes of our sponsored mutual funds and a $ 31 million reduction in our mutual fund servicing revenue , which is primarily attributable to our cost reduction efforts in the mutual fund and retirement plan servicing functions .
changes in administrative fees are generally offset by similar changes in related operating expenses that are incurred to provide services to the funds and their investors .
our largest expense , compensation and related costs , decreased $ 42 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , from 2008 to $ 773 million in 2009 .
the largest part of this decrease is attributable to a $ 19 million reduction in our annual bonus program .
reductions in the use of outside contractors lowered 2009 costs $ 14 million with the remainder of the cost savings primarily attributable to the workforce reduction and lower employee benefits and other employment expenses .
average headcount in 2009 was down 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) from 2008 due to attrition , retirements and our workforce reduction in april 2009 .
advertising and promotion expenditures were down $ 31 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) , versus 2008 due to our decision to reduce spending in response to lower investor activity in the 2009 market environment .
depreciation expense and other occupancy and facility costs together increased $ 4 million , or 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) compared to 2008 , as we moderated or delayed our capital spending and facility growth plans .
other operating expenses decreased $ 33 million , or 18% ( 18 % ) from 2008 , including a decline of $ 4 million in distribution and service expenses recognized on lower average assets under management in our advisor and r classes of mutual fund shares that are sourced from financial intermediaries .
our cost control efforts resulted in the remaining expense reductions , including lower professional fees and travel and related costs .
our non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 .
the improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 .
the following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the two years ended december 31 , 2009. .

Table:
	2008	2009	change
other than temporary impairments recognized	$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )	$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )	$ 55.2
capital gain distributions received	5.6	2.0	-3.6 ( 3.6 )
net gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions	-4.5 ( 4.5 )	7.4	11.9
net loss recognized on fund holdings	$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )	$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )	$ 63.5

Post-table text:
lower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments .
the 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 .
our 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) .
c a p i t a l r e s o u r c e s a n d l i q u i d i t y .
during 2010 , stockholders 2019 equity increased from $ 2.9 billion to $ 3.3 billion .
we repurchased nearly 5.0 million common shares for $ 240.0 million in 2010 .
tangible book value is $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2010 , and our cash and cash equivalents and our mutual fund investment holdings total more than $ 1.5 billion .
given the availability of these financial resources , we do not maintain an available external source of liquidity .
t .
rowe price group annual report 2010 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in 2008 what was the percent of the total operating revenues that was associated with other revenues

Pre-table text:
will continue to seek recovery from our customers through our fuel surcharge programs and expand our fuel conservation efforts .
2022 capital plan 2013 in 2009 , we expect our total capital investments to be approximately $ 2.8 billion ( which may be revised if business conditions or new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments ) .
see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan .
2022 financial expectations 2013 we are cautious about the economic environment ; however , we anticipate continued pricing opportunities , network improvement , and increased productivity in 2009 .
results of operations operating revenues millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 % (  % ) change 2008 v 2007 % (  % ) change 2007 v 2006 .

Table:
millions of dollars	2008	2007	2006	% (  % ) change 2008 v 2007	% (  % ) change 2007 v 2006
freight revenues	$ 17118	$ 15486	$ 14791	11% ( 11 % )	5% ( 5 % )
other revenues	852	797	787	7	1
total	$ 17970	$ 16283	$ 15578	10% ( 10 % )	5% ( 5 % )

Post-table text:
freight revenues are revenues generated by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups .
freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) .
arc is driven by changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges .
as a result of contractual obligations with some of our customers , we have provided incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as a reduction to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments .
we recognize freight revenues on a percentage-of- completion basis as freight moves from origin to destination .
we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them .
other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage .
we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations .
freight revenues from five of the six commodity groups increased during 2008 , with particularly strong growth from agricultural and energy shipments .
while revenues generated from chemical and industrial products shipments grew in 2008 compared to 2007 , hurricanes gustav and ike reduced shipments of these commodities .
revenues generated from automotive shipments declined versus 2007 .
greater fuel cost recoveries and core pricing improvement combined to increase arc during 2008 .
fuel cost recoveries include fuel surcharge revenue and the impact of resetting the base fuel price for certain traffic , as described below in more detail .
the severe economic downturn during the fourth quarter compounded already declining volumes experienced during the first nine months of 2008 due to ongoing weakness in certain market sectors .
as a result , we moved fewer intermodal , automotive , industrial products , and chemical shipments , which more than offset volume growth from agricultural and energy shipments .
our fuel surcharge programs ( excluding index-based contract escalators that contain some provision for fuel ) generated $ 2.3 billion in freight revenues during 2008 .
fuel surcharge revenue is not comparable to prior periods due to the implementation of new mileage-based fuel surcharge programs beginning in april 2007 for regulated traffic .
as previously disclosed in our 2006 annual report on form 10-k , the stb .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
considering the years 2015-2016 , what is the decrease observed in the cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans?

Pre-table text:
pension expense .

Table:
	2016	2015	2014
pension expense	$ 68.1	$ 135.6	$ 135.9
special terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above )	7.3	35.2	5.8
weighted average discount rate ( a )	4.1% ( 4.1 % )	4.0% ( 4.0 % )	4.6% ( 4.6 % )
weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets	7.5% ( 7.5 % )	7.4% ( 7.4 % )	7.7% ( 7.7 % )
weighted average expected rate of compensation increase	3.5% ( 3.5 % )	3.5% ( 3.5 % )	3.9% ( 3.9 % )

Post-table text:
( a ) effective in 2016 , the company began to measure the service cost and interest cost components of pension expense by applying spot rates along the yield curve to the relevant projected cash flows , as we believe this provides a better measurement of these costs .
the company has accounted for this as a change in accounting estimate and , accordingly has accounted for it on a prospective basis .
this change does not affect the measurement of the total benefit obligation .
2016 vs .
2015 pension expense , excluding special items , decreased from the prior year due to the adoption of the spot rate approach which reduced service cost and interest cost , the impact from expected return on assets and demographic gains , partially offset by the impact of the adoption of new mortality tables for our major plans .
special items of $ 7.3 included pension settlement losses of $ 6.4 , special termination benefits of $ 2.0 , and curtailment gains of $ 1.1 .
these resulted primarily from our recent business restructuring and cost reduction actions .
2015 vs .
2014 the decrease in pension expense , excluding special items , was due to the impact from expected return on assets , a 40 bp reduction in the weighted average compensation increase assumption , and lower service cost and interest cost .
the decrease was partially offset by the impact of higher amortization of actuarial losses , which resulted primarily from a 60 bp decrease in weighted average discount rate .
special items of $ 35.2 included pension settlement losses of $ 21.2 , special termination benefits of $ 8.7 , and curtailment losses of $ 5.3 .
these resulted primarily from our recent business restructuring and cost reduction actions .
2017 outlook in 2017 , pension expense , excluding special items , is estimated to be approximately $ 70 to $ 75 , an increase of $ 10 to $ 15 from 2016 , resulting primarily from a decrease in discount rates , offset by favorable asset experience , effects of the versum spin-off and the adoption of new mortality tables .
pension settlement losses of $ 10 to $ 15 are expected , dependent on the timing of retirements .
in 2017 , we expect pension expense to include approximately $ 164 for amortization of actuarial losses compared to $ 121 in 2016 .
net actuarial losses of $ 484 were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income in 2016 , primarily attributable to lower discount rates and improved mortality projections .
actuarial gains/losses are amortized into pension expense over prospective periods to the extent they are not offset by future gains or losses .
future changes in the discount rate and actual returns on plan assets different from expected returns would impact the actuarial gains/losses and resulting amortization in years beyond 2017 .
during the first quarter of 2017 , the company expects to record a curtailment loss estimated to be $ 5 to $ 10 related to employees transferring to versum .
the loss will be reflected in the results from discontinued operations on the consolidated income statements .
we continue to evaluate opportunities to manage the liabilities associated with our pension plans .
pension funding pension funding includes both contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are primarily non-qualified plans .
with respect to funded plans , our funding policy is that contributions , combined with appreciation and earnings , will be sufficient to pay benefits without creating unnecessary surpluses .
in addition , we make contributions to satisfy all legal funding requirements while managing our capacity to benefit from tax deductions attributable to plan contributions .
with the assistance of third party actuaries , we analyze the liabilities and demographics of each plan , which help guide the level of contributions .
during 2016 and 2015 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 79.3 and $ 137.5 , respectively .
for 2017 , cash contributions to defined benefit plans are estimated to be $ 65 to $ 85 .
the estimate is based on expected contributions to certain international plans and anticipated benefit payments for unfunded plans , which .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the difference in payments between entergy arkansas and entergy louisiana , in millions?

Pre-table text:
payments ( receipts ) ( in millions ) .

Table:
	payments ( receipts ) ( in millions )
entergy arkansas	$ 2
entergy louisiana	$ 6
entergy mississippi	( $ 4 )
entergy new orleans	( $ 1 )
entergy texas	( $ 3 )

Post-table text:
in september 2016 the ferc accepted the february 2016 compliance filing subject to a further compliance filing made in november 2016 .
the further compliance filing was required as a result of an order issued in september 2016 ruling on the january 2016 rehearing requests filed by the lpsc , the apsc , and entergy .
in the order addressing the rehearing requests , the ferc granted the lpsc 2019s rehearing request and directed that interest be calculated on the payment/receipt amounts .
the ferc also granted the apsc 2019s and entergy 2019s rehearing request and ordered the removal of both securitized asset accumulated deferred income taxes and contra-securitization accumulated deferred income taxes from the calculation .
in november 2016 , entergy submitted its compliance filing in response to the ferc 2019s order on rehearing .
the compliance filing included a revised refund calculation of the true-up payments and receipts based on 2009 test year data and interest calculations .
the lpsc protested the interest calculations .
in november 2017 the ferc issued an order rejecting the november 2016 compliance filing .
the ferc determined that the payments detailed in the november 2016 compliance filing did not include adequate interest for the payments from entergy arkansas to entergy louisiana because it did not include interest on the principal portion of the payment that was made in february 2016 .
in december 2017 , entergy recalculated the interest pursuant to the november 2017 order .
as a result of the recalculations , entergy arkansas owed very minor payments to entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , and entergy new orleans .
2011 rate filing based on calendar year 2010 production costs in may 2011 , entergy filed with the ferc the 2011 rates in accordance with the ferc 2019s orders in the system agreement proceeding . a0 a0several parties intervened in the proceeding at the ferc , including the lpsc , which also filed a protest . a0 a0in july a02011 the ferc a0accepted entergy 2019s proposed rates for filing , a0effective june a01 , a02011 , a0subject to refund .
after an abeyance of the proceeding schedule , in december 2014 the ferc consolidated the 2011 rate filing with the 2012 , 2013 , and 2014 rate filings for settlement and hearing procedures .
see discussion below regarding the consolidated settlement and hearing procedures in connection with this proceeding .
2012 rate filing based on calendar year 2011 production costs in may 2012 , entergy filed with the ferc the 2012 rates in accordance with the ferc 2019s orders in the system agreement proceeding . a0 a0several parties intervened in the proceeding at the ferc , including the lpsc , which also filed a protest . a0 a0in august 2012 the ferc a0accepted entergy 2019s proposed rates for filing , a0effective june a02012 , a0subject to refund .
after an abeyance of the proceeding schedule , in december 2014 the ferc consolidated the 2012 rate filing with the 2011 , 2013 , and 2014 rate filings for settlement and hearing procedures .
see discussion below regarding the consolidated settlement and hearing procedures in connection with this proceeding .
2013 rate filing based on calendar year 2012 production costs in may 2013 , entergy filed with the ferc the 2013 rates in accordance with the ferc 2019s orders in the system agreement proceeding .
several parties intervened in the proceeding at the ferc , including the lpsc , which also filed a protest .
the city council intervened and filed comments related to including the outcome of a related ferc proceeding in the 2013 cost equalization calculation .
in august 2013 the ferc issued an order accepting the 2013 rates , effective june 1 , 2013 , subject to refund .
after an abeyance of the proceeding schedule , in december 2014 the ferc consolidated the 2013 rate filing with the 2011 , 2012 , and 2014 rate filings for settlement and hearing procedures .
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the total interest expense for the year ending on may 27 , 2012 , ( in millions )

Pre-table text:
62 general mills amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss unrealized losses from interest rate cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , totaled $ 73.6 million after tax .
these deferred losses are primarily related to interest rate swaps that we entered into in contemplation of future borrowings and other financ- ing requirements and that are being reclassified into net interest over the lives of the hedged forecasted transac- tions .
unrealized losses from foreign currency cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , were $ 1.7 million after-tax .
the net amount of pre-tax gains and losses in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , that we expect to be reclassified into net earnings within the next 12 months is $ 14.0 million of expense .
credit-risk-related contingent features certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require us to maintain an investment grade credit rating on our debt from each of the major credit rat- ing agencies .
if our debt were to fall below investment grade , the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request full collateralization on derivative instru- ments in net liability positions .
the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position on may 27 , 2012 , was $ 19.9 million .
we have posted col- lateral of $ 4.3 million in the normal course of business associated with these contracts .
if the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on may 27 , 2012 , we would have been required to post an additional $ 15.6 million of collateral to counterparties .
concentrations of credit and counterparty credit risk during fiscal 2012 , wal-mart stores , inc .
and its affili- ates ( wal-mart ) accounted for 22 percent of our con- solidated net sales and 30 percent of our net sales in the u.s .
retail segment .
no other customer accounted for 10 percent or more of our consolidated net sales .
wal- mart also represented 6 percent of our net sales in the international segment and 7 percent of our net sales in the bakeries and foodservice segment .
as of may 27 , 2012 , wal-mart accounted for 26 percent of our u.s .
retail receivables , 5 percent of our international receiv- ables , and 9 percent of our bakeries and foodservice receivables .
the five largest customers in our u.s .
retail segment accounted for 54 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , the five largest customers in our international segment accounted for 26 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , and the five largest customers in our bakeries and foodservice segment accounted for 46 percent of its fis- cal 2012 net sales .
we enter into interest rate , foreign exchange , and cer- tain commodity and equity derivatives , primarily with a diversified group of highly rated counterparties .
we continually monitor our positions and the credit rat- ings of the counterparties involved and , by policy , limit the amount of credit exposure to any one party .
these transactions may expose us to potential losses due to the risk of nonperformance by these counterparties ; however , we have not incurred a material loss .
we also enter into commodity futures transactions through vari- ous regulated exchanges .
the amount of loss due to the credit risk of the coun- terparties , should the counterparties fail to perform according to the terms of the contracts , is $ 19.5 million against which we do not hold collateral .
under the terms of master swap agreements , some of our transactions require collateral or other security to support financial instruments subject to threshold levels of exposure and counterparty credit risk .
collateral assets are either cash or u.s .
treasury instruments and are held in a trust account that we may access if the counterparty defaults .
note 8 .
debt notes payable the components of notes payable and their respective weighted-average interest rates at the end of the periods were as follows: .

Table:
in millions	may 27 2012 notes payable	may 27 2012 weighted- average interest rate	may 27 2012 notespayable	weighted-averageinterest rate
u.s . commercial paper	$ 412.0	0.2% ( 0.2 % )	$ 192.5	0.2% ( 0.2 % )
financial institutions	114.5	10.0	118.8	11.5
total	$ 526.5	2.4% ( 2.4 % )	$ 311.3	4.5% ( 4.5 % )

Post-table text:
to ensure availability of funds , we maintain bank credit lines sufficient to cover our outstanding short- term borrowings .
commercial paper is a continuing source of short-term financing .
we have commercial paper programs available to us in the united states and europe .
in april 2012 , we entered into fee-paid commit- ted credit lines , consisting of a $ 1.0 billion facility sched- uled to expire in april 2015 and a $ 1.7 billion facility .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage of amounts expensed in 2009 came from discretionary company contributions?

Pre-table text:
notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) cash flows for 2010 , we expect to contribute $ 25.2 and $ 9.2 to our foreign pension plans and domestic pension plans , respectively .
a significant portion of our contributions to the foreign pension plans relate to the u.k .
pension plan .
additionally , we are in the process of modifying the schedule of employer contributions for the u.k .
pension plan and we expect to finalize this during 2010 .
as a result , we expect our contributions to our foreign pension plans to increase from current levels in 2010 and subsequent years .
during 2009 , we contributed $ 31.9 to our foreign pension plans and contributions to the domestic pension plan were negligible .
the following estimated future benefit payments , which reflect future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid in the years indicated below .
domestic pension plans foreign pension plans postretirement benefit plans .

Table:
years	domestic pension plans	foreign pension plans	postretirement benefit plans
2010	$ 17.2	$ 23.5	$ 5.8
2011	11.1	24.7	5.7
2012	10.8	26.4	5.7
2013	10.5	28.2	5.6
2014	10.5	32.4	5.5
2015 2013 2019	48.5	175.3	24.8

Post-table text:
the estimated future payments for our postretirement benefit plans are before any estimated federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 .
federal subsidies are estimated to range from $ 0.5 in 2010 to $ 0.6 in 2014 and are estimated to be $ 2.4 for the period 2015-2019 .
savings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees .
the savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allows participants to choose among various investment alternatives .
we match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service .
amounts expensed for the savings plans for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 35.1 , $ 29.6 and $ 31.4 , respectively .
expense includes a discretionary company contribution of $ 3.8 , $ 4.0 and $ 4.9 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 2.7 , $ 7.8 , $ 6.0 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
in addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 25.0 , $ 28.7 and $ 26.7 to these plans in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
deferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation , or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account .
the arrangements typically provide that the participant will receive the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service or upon retirement or termination .
as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the deferred compensation liability balance was $ 100.3 and $ 107.6 , respectively .
amounts expensed for deferred compensation arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 11.6 , $ 5.7 and $ 11.9 , respectively .
we have deferred benefit arrangements with certain key officers and employees that provide participants with an annual payment , payable when the participant attains a certain age and after the participant 2019s employment has terminated .
the deferred benefit liability was $ 178.2 and $ 182.1 as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
amounts expensed for deferred benefit arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 12.0 , $ 14.9 and $ 15.5 , respectively .
we have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .
as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 119.4 and $ 100.2 , respectively .
in addition to the life insurance policies , certain investments are held for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .
these investments , along with the life insurance policies , are held in a separate revocable trust for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and the deferred benefit .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percent of the square feet in owned facilities in other countries?

Pre-table text:
item 1b .
unresolved staff comments not applicable .
item 2 .
properties as of december 28 , 2013 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 29.9 16.7 46.6 leased facilities2 2.3 6.0 8.3 .

Table:
( square feet in millions )	unitedstates	othercountries	total
owned facilities1	29.9	16.7	46.6
leased facilities2	2.3	6.0	8.3
total facilities	32.2	22.7	54.9

Post-table text:
1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 .
2 leases expire on varying dates through 2028 and generally include renewals at our option .
our principal executive offices are located in the u.s .
and a significant amount of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s .
in addition to our current facilities , we are building a development fabrication facility in oregon which began r&d start-up in 2013 .
we expect that this new facility will allow us to widen our process technology lead .
we also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 , which is currently not in use and is not being depreciated .
we recently announced that we plan to delay equipment installation in this building and leverage existing fabrication facilities , reserving this new facility for additional capacity and future technologies .
outside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in israel , china , and ireland .
our fabrication facility in ireland is currently transitioning to a newer process technology node , with manufacturing expected to recommence in 2015 .
our assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , costa rica , and vietnam .
in addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers .
we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it .
we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment .
for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 27 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .
item 3 .
legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 26 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .
item 4 .
mine safety disclosures not applicable .
table of contents .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2017 to 2018?

Pre-table text:
table of contents adobe inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) certain states and foreign jurisdictions to fully utilize available tax credits and other attributes .
the deferred tax assets are offset by a valuation allowance to the extent it is more likely than not that they are not expected to be realized .
we provide u.s .
income taxes on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries unless the subsidiaries 2019 earnings are considered permanently reinvested outside the united states or are exempted from taxation as a result of the new territorial tax system .
to the extent that the foreign earnings previously treated as permanently reinvested are repatriated , the related u.s .
tax liability may be reduced by any foreign income taxes paid on these earnings .
as of november 30 , 2018 , the cumulative amount of earnings upon which u.s .
income taxes have not been provided is approximately $ 275 million .
the unrecognized deferred tax liability for these earnings is approximately $ 57.8 million .
as of november 30 , 2018 , we have net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 881.1 million for federal and $ 349.7 million for state .
we also have federal , state and foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $ 8.8 million , $ 189.9 million and $ 14.9 million , respectively .
the net operating loss carryforward assets and tax credits will expire in various years from fiscal 2019 through 2036 .
the state tax credit carryforwards and a portion of the federal net operating loss carryforwards can be carried forward indefinitely .
the net operating loss carryforward assets and certain credits are reduced by the valuation allowance and are subject to an annual limitation under internal revenue code section 382 , the carrying amount of which are expected to be fully realized .
as of november 30 , 2018 , a valuation allowance of $ 174.5 million has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to certain state and foreign assets .
for fiscal 2018 , the total change in the valuation allowance was $ 80.9 million .
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2018 and 2017 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
	2018	2017
beginning balance	$ 172945	$ 178413
gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions	16191	3680
gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions	-4000 ( 4000 )	-30166 ( 30166 )
gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions	60721	24927
settlements with taxing authorities	2014	-3876 ( 3876 )
lapse of statute of limitations	-45922 ( 45922 )	-8819 ( 8819 )
foreign exchange gains and losses	-3783 ( 3783 )	8786
ending balance	$ 196152	$ 172945

Post-table text:
the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns were approximately $ 24.6 million and $ 23.6 million for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively .
these amounts were included in long-term income taxes payable in their respective years .
we file income tax returns in the united states on a federal basis and in many u.s .
state and foreign jurisdictions .
we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities .
our major tax jurisdictions are ireland , california and the united states .
for ireland , california and the united states , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2008 , 2014 and 2015 , respectively .
we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from these examinations .
we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position .
the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process .
these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance of short-term and long- term assets , liabilities and income taxes payable .
we believe that within the next 12 months , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both .
given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential effect in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 45 million. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
considering the year 2018 , what is the cash flow result?

Pre-table text:
liquidity and capital resources we maintained a strong financial position throughout fiscal year 2019 .
as of 30 september 2019 , our consolidated balance sheet included cash and cash items of $ 2248.7 .
we continue to have consistent access to commercial paper markets , and cash flows from operating and financing activities are expected to meet liquidity needs for the foreseeable future .
as of 30 september 2019 , we had $ 971.5 of foreign cash and cash items compared to a total amount of cash and cash items of $ 2248.7 .
as a result of the tax act , we do not expect that a significant portion of our foreign subsidiaries' and affiliates' earnings will be subject to u.s .
income tax upon subsequent repatriation to the united states .
the repatriation of these earnings may be subject to foreign withholding and other taxes depending on the country in which the subsidiaries and affiliates reside .
however , because we have significant current investment plans outside the u.s. , it is our intent to permanently reinvest the majority of our foreign cash and cash items that would be subject to additional taxes outside the u.s .
refer to note 23 , income taxes , for additional information .
the table below summarizes our cash flows from operating activities , investing activities , and financing activities from continuing operations as reflected on the consolidated statements of cash flows: .

Table:
cash provided by ( used for )	2019	2018
operating activities	$ 2969.9	$ 2547.2
investing activities	-2113.4 ( 2113.4 )	-1641.6 ( 1641.6 )
financing activities	-1370.5 ( 1370.5 )	-1359.8 ( 1359.8 )

Post-table text:
operating activities for the fiscal year ended 30 september 2019 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2969.9 .
income from continuing operations of $ 1760.0 was adjusted for items including depreciation and amortization , deferred income taxes , impacts from the tax act , a charge for the facility closure of one of our customers , undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates , gain on sale of assets and investments , share-based compensation , noncurrent capital lease receivables , and certain other adjustments .
the caption "gain on sale of assets and investments" includes a gain of $ 14.1 recognized on the disposition of our interest in high-tech gases ( beijing ) co. , ltd. , a previously held equity investment in our industrial gases 2013 asia segment .
refer to note 7 , acquisitions , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .
the working capital accounts were a use of cash of $ 25.3 , primarily driven by $ 69.0 from trade receivables and $ 41.8 from payables and accrued liabilities , partially offset by $ 79.8 from other receivables .
the use of cash within "payables and accrued liabilities" was primarily driven by a $ 48.9 decrease in accrued utilities and a $ 30.3 decrease in accrued interest , partially offset by a $ 51.6 increase in customer advances primarily related to sale of equipment activity .
the decrease in accrued utilities was primarily driven by a contract modification to a tolling arrangement in india and lower utility costs in the industrial gases 2013 americas segment .
the source of cash from other receivables of $ 79.8 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures and the collection of value added taxes .
for the fiscal year ended 30 september 2018 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2547.2 , including income from continuing operations of $ 1455.6 .
other adjustments of $ 131.6 include a $ 54.9 net impact from the remeasurement of intercompany transactions .
the related hedging instruments that eliminate the earnings impact are included as a working capital adjustment in other receivables or payables and accrued liabilities .
in addition , other adjustments were impacted by cash received from the early termination of a cross currency swap of $ 54.4 , as well as the excess of pension expense over pension contributions of $ 23.5 .
the working capital accounts were a use of cash of $ 265.4 , primarily driven by payables and accrued liabilities , inventories , and trade receivables , partially offset by other receivables .
the use of cash in payables and accrued liabilities of $ 277.7 includes a decrease in customer advances of $ 145.7 primarily related to sale of equipment activity and $ 67.1 for maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures .
the use of cash in inventories primarily resulted from the purchase of helium molecules .
in addition , inventories reflect the noncash impact of our change in accounting for u.s .
inventories from lifo to fifo .
the source of cash from other receivables of $ 128.3 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the ratio of the free cash flow to the cash provided by operating activities in 2015

Pre-table text:
to , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities .
the following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : .

Table:
millions	2015	2014	2013
cash provided by operating activities	$ 7344	$ 7385	$ 6823
cash used in investing activities	-4476 ( 4476 )	-4249 ( 4249 )	-3405 ( 3405 )
dividends paid	-2344 ( 2344 )	-1632 ( 1632 )	-1333 ( 1333 )
free cash flow	$ 524	$ 1504	$ 2085

Post-table text:
2016 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve .
we will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments .
we will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety .
we will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network .
f0b7 network operations 2013 in 2016 , we will continue to align resources with customer demand , continue to improve network performance , and maintain our surge capability .
f0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices during 2015 , fuel price projections continue to be uncertain in the current environment .
we again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s .
domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors .
as prices fluctuate , there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months .
continuing lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport .
alternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments .
f0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2016 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 3.75 billion , including expenditures for ptc , 230 locomotives and 450 freight cars .
the capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments .
( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 economic conditions in many of our market sectors continue to drive uncertainty with respect to our volume levels .
we expect volumes to be down slightly in 2016 compared to 2015 , but will depend on the overall economy and market conditions .
the strong u.s .
dollar and historic low commodity prices could also drive continued volatility .
one of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities .
in the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives , and the ability to leverage our resources and strengthen our franchise .
over the longer term , we expect the overall u.s .
economy to continue to improve at a modest pace , with some markets outperforming others. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percent of the change between net revenue in 2007 and 2008 was due to rider revenue?

Pre-table text:
entergy new orleans , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2007 net revenue	$ 231.0
volume/weather	15.5
net gas revenue	6.6
rider revenue	3.9
base revenue	-11.3 ( 11.3 )
other	7.0
2008 net revenue	$ 252.7

Post-table text:
the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 .
entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 .
billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) .
the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 .
refer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase .
the rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 .
the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account .
the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .
the base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 .
the base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .
gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 .
fuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the change in the balance of liability for all restructuring from 2006 to 2008 , ( in millions ) ?

Pre-table text:
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total .

Table:
	2007 program	2003 program	2001 program	total
liability at december 31 2006	$ 2014	$ 12.6	$ 19.2	$ 31.8
net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments	19.1	-0.5 ( 0.5 )	-5.2 ( 5.2 )	13.4
payments and other1	-7.2 ( 7.2 )	-3.1 ( 3.1 )	-5.3 ( 5.3 )	-15.6 ( 15.6 )
liability at december 31 2007	$ 11.9	$ 9.0	$ 8.7	$ 29.6
net charges and adjustments	4.3	0.8	0.7	5.8
payments and other1	-15.0 ( 15.0 )	-4.1 ( 4.1 )	-3.5 ( 3.5 )	-22.6 ( 22.6 )
liability at december 31 2008	$ 1.2	$ 5.7	$ 5.9	$ 12.8

Post-table text:
1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates .
other reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb .
charges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs .
we expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 .
charges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete .
the charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage was eurasia sbu of total revenue in 2017?

Pre-table text:
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 on december 8 , 2017 , the board of directors declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $ 0.13 per share payable on february 15 , 2018 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 1 , 2018 .
stock repurchase program 2014 no shares were repurchased in 2017 .
the cumulative repurchases from the commencement of the program in july 2010 through december 31 , 2017 totaled 154.3 million shares for a total cost of $ 1.9 billion , at an average price per share of $ 12.12 ( including a nominal amount of commissions ) .
as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 246 million remained available for repurchase under the program .
the common stock repurchased has been classified as treasury stock and accounted for using the cost method .
a total of 155924785 and 156878891 shares were held as treasury stock at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .
restricted stock units under the company's employee benefit plans are issued from treasury stock .
the company has not retired any common stock repurchased since it began the program in july 2010 .
15 .
segments and geographic information the segment reporting structure uses the company's organizational structure as its foundation to reflect how the company manages the businesses internally and is organized by geographic regions which provides a socio- political-economic understanding of our business .
during the third quarter of 2017 , the europe and asia sbus were merged in order to leverage scale and are now reported as part of the eurasia sbu .
the management reporting structure is organized by five sbus led by our president and chief executive officer : us , andes , brazil , mcac and eurasia sbus .
the company determined that it has five operating and five reportable segments corresponding to its sbus .
all prior period results have been retrospectively revised to reflect the new segment reporting structure .
in february 2018 , we announced a reorganization as a part of our ongoing strategy to simplify our portfolio , optimize our cost structure , and reduce our carbon intensity .
the company is currently evaluating the impact this reorganization will have on our segment reporting structure .
corporate and other 2014 corporate overhead costs which are not directly associated with the operations of our five reportable segments are included in "corporate and other." also included are certain intercompany charges such as self-insurance premiums which are fully eliminated in consolidation .
the company uses adjusted ptc as its primary segment performance measure .
adjusted ptc , a non-gaap measure , is defined by the company as pre-tax income from continuing operations attributable to the aes corporation excluding gains or losses of the consolidated entity due to ( a ) unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions ; ( b ) unrealized foreign currency gains or losses ; ( c ) gains , losses and associated benefits and costs due to dispositions and acquisitions of business interests , including early plant closures ; ( d ) losses due to impairments ; ( e ) gains , losses and costs due to the early retirement of debt ; and ( f ) costs directly associated with a major restructuring program , including , but not limited to , workforce reduction efforts , relocations , and office consolidation .
adjusted ptc also includes net equity in earnings of affiliates on an after-tax basis adjusted for the same gains or losses excluded from consolidated entities .
the company has concluded adjusted ptc better reflects the underlying business performance of the company and is the most relevant measure considered in the company's internal evaluation of the financial performance of its segments .
additionally , given its large number of businesses and complexity , the company concluded that adjusted ptc is a more transparent measure that better assists investors in determining which businesses have the greatest impact on the company's results .
revenue and adjusted ptc are presented before inter-segment eliminations , which includes the effect of intercompany transactions with other segments except for interest , charges for certain management fees , and the write-off of intercompany balances , as applicable .
all intra-segment activity has been eliminated within the segment .
inter-segment activity has been eliminated within the total consolidated results .
the following tables present financial information by segment for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

Table:
year ended december 31,	total revenue 2017	total revenue 2016	total revenue 2015
us sbu	$ 3229	$ 3429	$ 3593
andes sbu	2710	2506	2489
brazil sbu	542	450	962
mcac sbu	2448	2172	2353
eurasia sbu	1590	1670	1875
corporate and other	35	77	31
eliminations	-24 ( 24 )	-23 ( 23 )	-43 ( 43 )
total revenue	$ 10530	$ 10281	$ 11260

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in 2005 what was the percent of the investment banking as part of the total segments operations

Pre-table text:
segment results 2013 operating basis ( a ) ( b ) ( table continued from previous page ) year ended december 31 , operating earnings return on common equity 2013 goodwill ( c ) .

Table:
year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios )	year ended december 31 , 2005	year ended december 31 , 2004	year ended december 31 , change	2005	2004
investment bank	$ 3658	$ 2948	24% ( 24 % )	18% ( 18 % )	17% ( 17 % )
retail financial services	3427	2199	56	26	24
card services	1907	1274	50	16	17
commercial banking	1007	608	66	30	29
treasury & securities services	1037	440	136	55	17
asset & wealth management	1216	681	79	51	17
corporate	-1731 ( 1731 )	61	nm	nm	nm
total	$ 10521	$ 8211	28% ( 28 % )	17% ( 17 % )	16% ( 16 % )

Post-table text:
jpmorgan chase & co .
/ 2005 annual report 35 and are retained in corporate .
these retained expenses include parent company costs that would not be incurred if the segments were stand-alone businesses ; adjustments to align certain corporate staff , technology and operations allocations with market prices ; and other one-time items not aligned with the business segments .
during 2005 , the firm refined cost allocation methodologies related to certain corporate functions , technology and operations expenses in order to improve transparency , consistency and accountability with regard to costs allocated across business segments .
prior periods have not been revised to reflect these new cost allocation methodologies .
capital allocation each business segment is allocated capital by taking into consideration stand- alone peer comparisons , economic risk measures and regulatory capital requirements .
the amount of capital assigned to each business is referred to as equity .
at the time of the merger , goodwill , as well as the associated capital , was allocated solely to corporate .
effective january 2006 , the firm expects to refine its methodology for allocating capital to the business segments to include any goodwill associated with line of business-directed acquisitions since the merger .
u.s .
gaap requires the allocation of goodwill to the business segments for impairment testing ( see critical accounting estimates used by the firm and note 15 on pages 81 2013 83 and 114 2013116 , respectively , of this annual report ) .
see the capital management section on page 56 of this annual report for a discussion of the equity framework .
credit reimbursement tss reimburses the ib for credit portfolio exposures the ib manages on behalf of clients the segments share .
at the time of the merger , the reimbursement methodology was revised to be based upon pre-tax earnings , net of the cost of capital related to those exposures .
prior to the merger , the credit reimbursement was based upon pre-tax earnings , plus the allocated capital associated with the shared clients .
tax-equivalent adjustments segment and firm results reflect revenues on a tax-equivalent basis for segment reporting purposes .
refer to explanation and reconciliation of the firm 2019s non-gaap financial measures on page 31 of this annual report for additional details .
description of business segment reporting methodology results of the business segments are intended to reflect each segment as if it were essentially a stand-alone business .
the management reporting process that derives these results allocates income and expense using market-based methodologies .
effective with the merger on july 1 , 2004 , several of the allocation methodologies were revised , as noted below .
as prior periods have not been revised to reflect these new methodologies , they are not comparable to the presentation of periods beginning with the third quarter of 2004 .
further , the firm continues to assess the assumptions , methodologies and reporting reclassifications used for segment reporting , and further refinements may be implemented in future periods .
revenue sharing when business segments join efforts to sell products and services to the firm 2019s clients , the participating business segments agree to share revenues from those transactions .
these revenue-sharing agreements were revised on the merger date to provide consistency across the lines of business .
funds transfer pricing funds transfer pricing ( 201cftp 201d ) is used to allocate interest income and expense to each business and transfer the primary interest rate risk exposures to corporate .
the allocation process is unique to each business and considers the interest rate risk , liquidity risk and regulatory requirements of its stand- alone peers .
business segments may retain certain interest rate exposures , subject to management approval , that would be expected in the normal operation of a similar peer business .
in the third quarter of 2004 , ftp was revised to conform the policies of the combined firms .
expense allocation where business segments use services provided by support units within the firm , the costs of those support units are allocated to the business segments .
those expenses are allocated based upon their actual cost , or the lower of actual cost or market cost , as well as upon usage of the services provided .
effective with the third quarter of 2004 , the cost allocation methodologies of the heritage firms were aligned to provide consistency across the business segments .
in addition , expenses related to certain corporate functions , technology and operations ceased to be allocated to the business segments .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percent higher is fair value than carrying value?

Pre-table text:
credit facility , which was amended in 2013 and 2012 .
in march 2014 , the company 2019s credit facility was further amended to extend the maturity date to march 2019 .
the amount of the aggregate commitment is $ 3.990 billion ( the 201c2014 credit facility 201d ) .
the 2014 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2014 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 4.990 billion .
interest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread .
the 2014 credit facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio ( ratio of net debt to earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization , where net debt equals total debt less unrestricted cash ) of 3 to 1 , which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31 , 2014 .
the 2014 credit facility provides back-up liquidity , funds ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and funds various investment opportunities .
at december 31 , 2014 , the company had no amount outstanding under the 2014 credit facility .
commercial paper program .
on october 14 , 2009 , blackrock established a commercial paper program ( the 201ccp program 201d ) under which the company could issue unsecured commercial paper notes ( the 201ccp notes 201d ) on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.0 billion .
blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount that could be borrowed under the cp program to $ 3.5 billion in 2011 and to $ 3.785 billion in 2012 .
in april 2013 , blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount for which the company could issue unsecured cp notes on a private-placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.990 billion .
the cp program is currently supported by the 2014 credit facility .
at december 31 , 2014 , blackrock had no cp notes outstanding .
long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2014 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value .

Table:
( in millions )	maturity amount	unamortized discount	carrying value	fair value
1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015	$ 750	$ 2014	$ 750	$ 753
6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017	700	-1 ( 1 )	699	785
5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019	1000	-2 ( 2 )	998	1134
4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021	750	-3 ( 3 )	747	825
3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022	750	-3 ( 3 )	747	783
3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2024	1000	-3 ( 3 )	997	1029
total long-term borrowings	$ 4950	$ -12 ( 12 )	$ 4938	$ 5309

Post-table text:
long-term borrowings at december 31 , 2013 had a carrying value of $ 4.939 billion and a fair value of $ 5.284 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2013 .
2024 notes .
in march 2014 , the company issued $ 1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on march 18 , 2024 ( the 201c2024 notes 201d ) .
the net proceeds of the 2024 notes were used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 .
interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year .
the 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
the 2024 notes were issued at a discount of $ 3 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 6 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the term of the 2024 notes .
at december 31 , 2014 , $ 6 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
2015 and 2022 notes .
in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .
net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .
interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .
the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .
the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes .
at december 31 , 2014 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
2021 notes .
in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .
net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .
( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) .
interest .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}