[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the average payment volume per transaction for american express?

Pre-table text:
largest operators of open-loop and closed-loop retail electronic payments networks the largest operators of open-loop and closed-loop retail electronic payments networks are visa , mastercard , american express , discover , jcb and diners club .
with the exception of discover , which primarily operates in the united states , all of the other network operators can be considered multi- national or global providers of payments network services .
based on payments volume , total volume , number of transactions and number of cards in circulation , visa is the largest retail electronic payments network in the world .
the following chart compares our network with those of our major competitors for calendar year 2007 : company payments volume volume transactions cards ( billions ) ( billions ) ( billions ) ( millions ) visa inc. ( 1 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 2457 $ 3822 50.3 1592 .

Table:
company	payments volume ( billions )	total volume ( billions )	total transactions ( billions )	cards ( millions )
visa inc. ( 1 )	$ 2457	$ 3822	50.3	1592
mastercard	1697	2276	27.0	916
american express	637	647	5.0	86
discover	102	119	1.6	57
jcb	55	61	0.6	58
diners club	29	30	0.2	7

Post-table text:
( 1 ) visa inc .
figures as reported previously in our filings .
source : the nilson report , issue 902 ( may 2008 ) and issue 903 ( may 2008 ) .
note : visa inc .
figures exclude visa europe .
figures for competitors include their respective european operations .
visa figures include visa , visa electron , and interlink brands .
visa cards include plus proprietary cards , but proprietary plus cash volume is not included .
domestic china figures are excluded .
mastercard figures include pin-based debit card figures on mastercard cards , but not maestro or cirrus figures .
china commercial funds transfers are excluded .
american express and discover include business from third-party issuers .
jcb figures are for april 2006 through march 2007 , but cards and outlets are as of september 2007 .
jcb total transaction figures are estimates .
our primary operations we generate revenue from the transaction processing services we offer to our customers .
our customers deliver visa products and payment services to consumers and merchants based on the product platforms we define and manage .
payments network management is a core part of our operations , as it ensures that our payments system provides a safe , efficient , consistent , and interoperable service to cardholders , merchants , and financial institutions worldwide .
transaction processing services core processing services our core processing services involve the routing of payment information and related data to facilitate the authorization , clearing and settlement of transactions between visa issuers , which are the financial institutions that issue visa cards to cardholders , and acquirers , which are the financial institutions that offer visa network connectivity and payments acceptance services to merchants .
in addition , we offer a range of value-added processing services to support our customers 2019 visa programs and to promote the growth and security of the visa payments network .
authorization is the process of approving or declining a transaction before a purchase is finalized or cash is disbursed .
clearing is the process of delivering final transaction data from an acquirer to an issuer for posting to the cardholder 2019s account , the calculation of certain fees and charges that apply to the issuer and acquirer involved in the transaction , and the conversion of transaction amounts to the .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage cumulative total return for the five year period ended 31-dec-2017 of citi common stock?

Pre-table text:
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 .
the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .
comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

Table:
date	citi	s&p 500	s&p financials
31-dec-2012	100.0	100.0	100.0
31-dec-2013	131.8	132.4	135.6
31-dec-2014	137.0	150.5	156.2
31-dec-2015	131.4	152.6	153.9
31-dec-2016	152.3	170.8	188.9
31-dec-2017	193.5	208.1	230.9

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage of the total oil and gas mmboe comes from canada?

Pre-table text:
the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after december 15 , 2008 .
we will evaluate how the new requirements of statement no .
141 ( r ) would impact any business combinations completed in 2009 or thereafter .
in december 2007 , the fasb also issued statement of financial accounting standards no .
160 , noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements 2014an amendment of accounting research bulletin no .
51 .
a noncontrolling interest , sometimes called a minority interest , is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable , directly or indirectly , to a parent .
statement no .
160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary .
under statement no .
160 , noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary must be reported as a component of consolidated equity separate from the parent 2019s equity .
additionally , the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest must be reported separately on the face of the income statement .
statement no .
160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after december 15 , 2008 and earlier adoption is prohibited .
we do not expect the adoption of statement no .
160 to have a material impact on our financial statements and related disclosures .
2008 estimates the forward-looking statements provided in this discussion are based on our examination of historical operating trends , the information that was used to prepare the december 31 , 2007 reserve reports and other data in our possession or available from third parties .
these forward-looking statements were prepared assuming demand , curtailment , producibility and general market conditions for our oil , natural gas and ngls during 2008 will be substantially similar to those of 2007 , unless otherwise noted .
we make reference to the 201cdisclosure regarding forward-looking statements 201d at the beginning of this report .
amounts related to canadian operations have been converted to u.s .
dollars using a projected average 2008 exchange rate of $ 0.98 u.s .
dollar to $ 1.00 canadian dollar .
in january 2007 , we announced our intent to divest our west african oil and gas assets and terminate our operations in west africa , including equatorial guinea , cote d 2019ivoire , gabon and other countries in the region .
in november 2007 , we announced an agreement to sell our operations in gabon for $ 205.5 million .
we are finalizing purchase and sales agreements and obtaining the necessary partner and government approvals for the remaining properties in this divestiture package .
we are optimistic we can complete these sales during the first half of 2008 .
all west african related revenues , expenses and capital will be reported as discontinued operations in our 2008 financial statements .
accordingly , all forward-looking estimates in the following discussion exclude amounts related to our operations in west africa , unless otherwise noted .
though we have completed several major property acquisitions and dispositions in recent years , these transactions are opportunity driven .
thus , the following forward-looking estimates do not include any financial and operating effects of potential property acquisitions or divestitures that may occur during 2008 , except for west africa as previously discussed .
oil , gas and ngl production set forth below are our estimates of oil , gas and ngl production for 2008 .
we estimate that our combined 2008 oil , gas and ngl production will total approximately 240 to 247 mmboe .
of this total , approximately 92% ( 92 % ) is estimated to be produced from reserves classified as 201cproved 201d at december 31 , 2007 .
the following estimates for oil , gas and ngl production are calculated at the midpoint of the estimated range for total production .
oil gas ngls total ( mmbbls ) ( bcf ) ( mmbbls ) ( mmboe ) .

Table:
	oil ( mmbbls )	gas ( bcf )	ngls ( mmbbls )	total ( mmboe )
u.s . onshore	12	626	23	140
u.s . offshore	8	68	1	20
canada	23	198	4	60
international	23	2	2014	23
total	66	894	28	243

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in 2010 what was the net change in net revenue in millions

Pre-table text:
entergy mississippi , inc .
management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2009 net revenue	$ 536.7
volume/weather	18.9
other	-0.3 ( 0.3 )
2010 net revenue	$ 555.3

Post-table text:
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector .
gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates .
fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand .
other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider .
other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory .
the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment .
taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year .
depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service .
interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what are the deferred fuel cost revisions as a percentage of the increase in fuel cost recovery revenues?

Pre-table text:
entergy louisiana , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 98.0 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates ; and 2022 an increase due to volume/weather , as discussed above .
the increase was partially offset by the following : 2022 a decrease of $ 31.9 million in the price applied to unbilled sales , as discussed above ; 2022 a decrease of $ 12.2 million in rate refund provisions , as discussed above ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 5.2 million in gross wholesale revenue due to decreased sales to affiliated systems .
fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs ; and 2022 an increase in the market price of natural gas .
other regulatory credits increased primarily due to : 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 14.3 million of capacity charges related to generation resource planning as allowed by the lpsc ; 2022 the amortization in 2003 of $ 11.8 million of deferred capacity charges , as discussed above ; and 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 11.4 million related to entergy's voluntary severance program , in accordance with a proposed stipulation with the lpsc staff .
2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy louisiana's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .

Table:
	( in millions )
2002 net revenue	$ 922.9
deferred fuel cost revisions	59.1
asset retirement obligation	8.2
volume	-16.2 ( 16.2 )
vidalia settlement	-9.2 ( 9.2 )
other	8.9
2003 net revenue	$ 973.7

Post-table text:
the deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted from a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in december 2002 and a further revision made in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs .
the asset retirement obligation variance was due to the implementation of sfas 143 , "accounting for asset retirement obligations" adopted in january 2003 .
see "critical accounting estimates" for more details on sfas 143 .
the increase was offset by decommissioning expense and had no effect on net income .
the volume variance was due to a decrease in electricity usage in the service territory .
billed usage decreased 1868 gwh in the industrial sector including the loss of a large industrial customer to cogeneration. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the change in millions of operating income from 2016 to 2017?

Pre-table text:
net revenues include $ 3.8 billion in 2017 and $ 739 million in 2016 related to the sale of rrps , mainly driven by japan .
these net revenue amounts include excise taxes billed to customers .
excluding excise taxes , net revenues for rrps were $ 3.6 billion in 2017 and $ 733 million in 2016 .
in some jurisdictions , including japan , we are not responsible for collecting excise taxes .
in 2017 , approximately $ 0.9 billion of our $ 3.6 billion in rrp net revenues , excluding excise taxes , were from iqos devices and accessories .
excise taxes on products increased by $ 1.1 billion , due to : 2022 higher excise taxes resulting from changes in retail prices and tax rates ( $ 4.6 billion ) , partially offset by 2022 favorable currency ( $ 1.9 billion ) and 2022 lower excise taxes resulting from volume/mix ( $ 1.6 billion ) .
our cost of sales ; marketing , administration and research costs ; and operating income were as follows : for the years ended december 31 , variance .

Table:
( in millions )	for the years ended december 31 , 2017	for the years ended december 31 , 2016	for the years ended december 31 , $	% (  % )
cost of sales	$ 10432	$ 9391	$ 1041	11.1% ( 11.1 % )
marketing administration and research costs	6725	6405	320	5.0% ( 5.0 % )
operating income	11503	10815	688	6.4% ( 6.4 % )

Post-table text:
cost of sales increased by $ 1.0 billion , due to : 2022 higher cost of sales resulting from volume/mix ( $ 1.1 billion ) , partly offset by 2022 lower manufacturing costs ( $ 36 million ) and 2022 favorable currency ( $ 30 million ) .
marketing , administration and research costs increased by $ 320 million , due to : 2022 higher expenses ( $ 570 million , largely reflecting increased investment behind reduced-risk products , predominately in the european union and asia ) , partly offset by 2022 favorable currency ( $ 250 million ) .
operating income increased by $ 688 million , due primarily to : 2022 price increases ( $ 1.4 billion ) , partly offset by 2022 higher marketing , administration and research costs ( $ 570 million ) and 2022 unfavorable currency ( $ 157 million ) .
interest expense , net , of $ 914 million increased by $ 23 million , due primarily to unfavorably currency and higher average debt levels , partly offset by higher interest income .
our effective tax rate increased by 12.8 percentage points to 40.7% ( 40.7 % ) .
the 2017 effective tax rate was unfavorably impacted by $ 1.6 billion due to the tax cuts and jobs act .
for further details , see item 8 , note 11 .
income taxes to our consolidated financial statements .
we are continuing to evaluate the impact that the tax cuts and jobs act will have on our tax liability .
based upon our current interpretation of the tax cuts and jobs act , we estimate that our 2018 effective tax rate will be approximately 28% ( 28 % ) , subject to future regulatory developments and earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction .
we are regularly examined by tax authorities around the world , and we are currently under examination in a number of jurisdictions .
it is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months certain tax examinations will close , which could result in a change in unrecognized tax benefits along with related interest and penalties .
an estimate of any possible change cannot be made at this time .
net earnings attributable to pmi of $ 6.0 billion decreased by $ 932 million ( 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) ) .
this decrease was due primarily to a higher effective tax rate as discussed above , partly offset by higher operating income .
diluted and basic eps of $ 3.88 decreased by 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) .
excluding .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was jpmorgan chase & co's common equity tier 1 ( cet1 ) ratio in 2008?

Pre-table text:
jpmorgan chase & co .
/ 2008 annual report 83 credit risk capital credit risk capital is estimated separately for the wholesale business- es ( ib , cb , tss and am ) and consumer businesses ( rfs and cs ) .
credit risk capital for the overall wholesale credit portfolio is defined in terms of unexpected credit losses , both from defaults and declines in the portfolio value due to credit deterioration , measured over a one-year period at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard .
unexpected losses are losses in excess of those for which provisions for credit losses are maintained .
the capital methodology is based upon several principal drivers of credit risk : exposure at default ( or loan-equivalent amount ) , default likelihood , credit spreads , loss severity and portfolio correlation .
credit risk capital for the consumer portfolio is based upon product and other relevant risk segmentation .
actual segment level default and severity experience are used to estimate unexpected losses for a one-year horizon at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard .
statistical results for certain segments or portfolios are adjusted to ensure that capital is consistent with external bench- marks , such as subordination levels on market transactions or capital held at representative monoline competitors , where appropriate .
market risk capital the firm calculates market risk capital guided by the principle that capital should reflect the risk of loss in the value of portfolios and financial instruments caused by adverse movements in market vari- ables , such as interest and foreign exchange rates , credit spreads , securities prices and commodities prices .
daily value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) , biweekly stress-test results and other factors are used to determine appropriate capital levels .
the firm allocates market risk capital to each business segment according to a formula that weights that seg- ment 2019s var and stress-test exposures .
see market risk management on pages 111 2013116 of this annual report for more information about these market risk measures .
operational risk capital capital is allocated to the lines of business for operational risk using a risk-based capital allocation methodology which estimates opera- tional risk on a bottom-up basis .
the operational risk capital model is based upon actual losses and potential scenario-based stress losses , with adjustments to the capital calculation to reflect changes in the quality of the control environment or the use of risk-transfer prod- ucts .
the firm believes its model is consistent with the new basel ii framework .
private equity risk capital capital is allocated to privately and publicly held securities , third-party fund investments and commitments in the private equity portfolio to cover the potential loss associated with a decline in equity markets and related asset devaluations .
in addition to negative market fluctua- tions , potential losses in private equity investment portfolios can be magnified by liquidity risk .
the capital allocation for the private equity portfolio is based upon measurement of the loss experience suffered by the firm and other market participants over a prolonged period of adverse equity market conditions .
regulatory capital the board of governors of the federal reserve system ( the 201cfederal reserve 201d ) establishes capital requirements , including well-capitalized standards for the consolidated financial holding company .
the office of the comptroller of the currency ( 201cocc 201d ) establishes similar capital requirements and standards for the firm 2019s national banks , including jpmorgan chase bank , n.a. , and chase bank usa , n.a .
the federal reserve granted the firm , for a period of 18 months fol- lowing the bear stearns merger , relief up to a certain specified amount and subject to certain conditions from the federal reserve 2019s risk-based capital and leverage requirements with respect to bear stearns 2019 risk-weighted assets and other exposures acquired .
the amount of such relief is subject to reduction by one-sixth each quarter subsequent to the merger and expires on october 1 , 2009 .
the occ granted jpmorgan chase bank , n.a .
similar relief from its risk-based capital and leverage requirements .
jpmorgan chase maintained a well-capitalized position , based upon tier 1 and total capital ratios at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , as indicated in the tables below .
for more information , see note 30 on pages 212 2013213 of this annual report .
risk-based capital components and assets .

Table:
december 31 ( in millions )	2008	2007
total tier 1capital ( a )	$ 136104	$ 88746
total tier 2 capital	48616	43496
total capital	$ 184720	$ 132242
risk-weighted assets	$ 1244659	$ 1051879
total adjusted average assets	1966895	1473541

Post-table text:
( a ) the fasb has been deliberating certain amendments to both sfas 140 and fin 46r that may impact the accounting for transactions that involve qspes and vies .
based on the provisions of the current proposal and the firm 2019s interpretation of the propos- al , the firm estimates that the impact of consolidation could be up to $ 70 billion of credit card receivables , $ 40 billion of assets related to firm-sponsored multi-seller conduits , and $ 50 billion of other loans ( including residential mortgages ) ; the decrease in the tier 1 capital ratio could be approximately 80 basis points .
the ulti- mate impact could differ significantly due to the fasb 2019s continuing deliberations on the final requirements of the rule and market conditions. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
at the end of 2014 , the notional value of derivatives designated as hedging instruments under gaap was what percent of the fair value?

Pre-table text:
note 17 financial derivatives we use derivative financial instruments ( derivatives ) primarily to help manage exposure to interest rate , market and credit risk and reduce the effects that changes in interest rates may have on net income , fair value of assets and liabilities , and cash flows .
we also enter into derivatives with customers to facilitate their risk management activities .
derivatives represent contracts between parties that usually require little or no initial net investment and result in one party delivering cash or another type of asset to the other party based on a notional amount and an underlying as specified in the contract .
derivative transactions are often measured in terms of notional amount , but this amount is generally not exchanged and it is not recorded on the balance sheet .
the notional amount is the basis to which the underlying is applied to determine required payments under the derivative contract .
the underlying is a referenced interest rate ( commonly libor ) , security price , credit spread or other index .
residential and commercial real estate loan commitments associated with loans to be sold also qualify as derivative instruments .
the following table presents the notional amounts and gross fair values of all derivative assets and liabilities held by pnc : table 127 : total gross derivatives .

Table:
in millions	december 31 2013 notional/contractamount	december 31 2013 assetfairvalue ( a )	december 31 2013 liabilityfairvalue ( b )	december 31 2013 notional/contractamount	december 31 2013 assetfairvalue ( a )	liabilityfairvalue ( b )
derivatives designated as hedging instruments under gaap	$ 36197	$ 1189	$ 364	$ 29270	$ 1872	$ 152
derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under gaap	345059	3604	3570	337086	6696	6458
total gross derivatives	$ 381256	$ 4793	$ 3934	$ 366356	$ 8568	$ 6610

Post-table text:
( a ) included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheet .
( b ) included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .
all derivatives are carried on our consolidated balance sheet at fair value .
derivative balances are presented on the consolidated balance sheet on a net basis taking into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements and any related cash collateral exchanged with counterparties .
further discussion regarding the rights of setoff associated with these legally enforceable master netting agreements is included in the offsetting , counterparty credit risk , and contingent features section below .
our exposure related to risk participations where we sold protection is discussed in the credit derivatives section below .
any nonperformance risk , including credit risk , is included in the determination of the estimated net fair value of the derivatives .
further discussion on how derivatives are accounted for is included in note 1 accounting policies .
derivatives designated as hedging instruments under gaap certain derivatives used to manage interest rate risk as part of our asset and liability risk management activities are designated as accounting hedges under gaap .
derivatives hedging the risks associated with changes in the fair value of assets or liabilities are considered fair value hedges , derivatives hedging the variability of expected future cash flows are considered cash flow hedges , and derivatives hedging a net investment in a foreign subsidiary are considered net investment hedges .
designating derivatives as accounting hedges allows for gains and losses on those derivatives , to the extent effective , to be recognized in the income statement in the same period the hedged items affect earnings .
the pnc financial services group , inc .
2013 form 10-k 189 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the increase in class a common stock issued and outstanding between years , in thousands?

Pre-table text:
14 .
capital stock shares outstanding .
the following table presents information regarding capital stock: .

Table:
( in thousands )	december 31 , 2017	december 31 , 2016
class a common stock authorized	1000000	1000000
class a common stock issued and outstanding	339235	338240
class b-1 common stock authorized issued and outstanding	0.6	0.6
class b-2 common stock authorized issued and outstanding	0.8	0.8
class b-3 common stock authorized issued and outstanding	1.3	1.3
class b-4 common stock authorized issued and outstanding	0.4	0.4

Post-table text:
cme group has no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding .
associated trading rights .
members of cme , cbot , nymex and comex own or lease trading rights which entitle them to access open outcry trading , discounts on trading fees and the right to vote on certain exchange matters as provided for by the rules of the particular exchange and cme group 2019s or the subsidiaries 2019 organizational documents .
each class of cme group class b common stock is associated with a membership in a specific division for trading at cme .
a cme trading right is a separate asset that is not part of or evidenced by the associated share of class b common stock of cme group .
the class b common stock of cme group is intended only to ensure that the class b shareholders of cme group retain rights with respect to representation on the board of directors and approval rights with respect to the core rights described below .
trading rights at cbot are evidenced by class b memberships in cbot , at nymex by class a memberships in nymex and at comex by comex division memberships .
members of cbot , nymex and comex do not have any rights to elect members of the board of directors and are not entitled to receive dividends or other distributions on their memberships or trading permits .
core rights .
holders of cme group class b common shares have the right to approve changes in specified rights relating to the trading privileges at cme associated with those shares .
these core rights relate primarily to trading right protections , certain trading fee protections and certain membership benefit protections .
votes on changes to these core rights are weighted by class .
each class of class b common stock has the following number of votes on matters relating to core rights : class b-1 , six votes per share ; class b-2 , two votes per share ; class b-3 , one vote per share ; and class b-4 , 1/6th of one vote per share .
the approval of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares of class b common stock is required in order to approve any changes to core rights .
holders of shares of class a common stock do not have the right to vote on changes to core rights .
voting rights .
with the exception of the matters reserved to holders of cme group class b common stock , holders of cme group common stock vote together on all matters for which a vote of common shareholders is required .
in these votes , each holder of shares of class a or class b common stock of cme group has one vote per share .
transfer restrictions .
each class of cme group class b common stock is subject to transfer restrictions contained in the certificate of incorporation of cme group .
these transfer restrictions prohibit the sale or transfer of any shares of class b common stock separate from the sale of the associated trading rights .
election of directors .
the cme group board of directors is currently comprised of 20 members .
holders of class b-1 , class b-2 and class b-3 common stock have the right to elect six directors , of which three are elected by class b-1 shareholders , two are elected by class b-2 shareholders and one is elected by class b-3 shareholders .
the remaining directors are elected by the class a and class b shareholders voting as a single class. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in millions what was total residential mortgages balance for 2013 and 2012?

Pre-table text:
conditions and changes to regulatory capital requirements under basel iii capital standards .
beginning in 2014 , other comprehensive income related to available for sale securities ( as well as pension and other post-retirement plans ) are included in pnc 2019s regulatory capital ( subject to a phase-in schedule ) and , therefore will affect pnc 2019s regulatory capital ratios .
for additional information , see the supervision and regulation section in item 1 2013 business and the capital portion of the balance sheet review section in this item 7 of this report .
the duration of investment securities was 2.9 years at december 31 , 2013 .
we estimate that , at december 31 , 2013 , the effective duration of investment securities was 3.0 years for an immediate 50 basis points parallel increase in interest rates and 2.8 years for an immediate 50 basis points parallel decrease in interest rates .
comparable amounts at december 31 , 2012 were 2.3 years and 2.2 years , respectively .
we conduct a quarterly comprehensive security-level impairment assessment on all securities .
for securities in an unrealized loss position , we determine whether the loss represents otti .
for debt securities that we neither intend to sell nor believe we will be required to sell prior to expected recovery , we recognize the credit portion of otti charges in current earnings and include the noncredit portion of otti in net unrealized gains ( losses ) on otti securities on our consolidated statement of comprehensive income and net of tax in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) on our consolidated balance sheet .
during 2013 and 2012 we recognized otti credit losses of $ 16 million and $ 111 million , respectively .
substantially all of the credit losses related to residential mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities collateralized by non-agency residential loans .
if current housing and economic conditions were to deteriorate from current levels , and if market volatility and illiquidity were to deteriorate from current levels , or if market interest rates were to increase or credit spreads were to widen appreciably , the valuation of our investment securities portfolio could be adversely affected and we could incur additional otti credit losses that would impact our consolidated income statement .
additional information regarding our investment securities is included in note 8 investment securities and note 9 fair value in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report .
loans held for sale table 15 : loans held for sale in millions december 31 december 31 .

Table:
in millions	december 312013	december 312012
commercial mortgages at fair value	$ 586	$ 772
commercial mortgages at lower of cost or fair value	281	620
total commercial mortgages	867	1392
residential mortgages at fair value	1315	2096
residential mortgages at lower of cost or fair value	41	124
total residential mortgages	1356	2220
other	32	81
total	$ 2255	$ 3693

Post-table text:
for commercial mortgages held for sale designated at fair value , we stopped originating these and continue to pursue opportunities to reduce these positions .
at december 31 , 2013 , the balance relating to these loans was $ 586 million compared to $ 772 million at december 31 , 2012 .
for commercial mortgages held for sale carried at lower of cost or fair value , we sold $ 2.8 billion in 2013 compared to $ 2.2 billion in 2012 .
all of these loan sales were to government agencies .
total gains of $ 79 million were recognized on the valuation and sale of commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , in 2013 , and $ 41 million in 2012 .
residential mortgage loan origination volume was $ 15.1 billion in 2013 compared to $ 15.2 billion in 2012 .
substantially all such loans were originated under agency or federal housing administration ( fha ) standards .
we sold $ 14.7 billion of loans and recognized related gains of $ 568 million in 2013 .
the comparable amounts for 2012 were $ 13.8 billion and $ 747 million , respectively .
interest income on loans held for sale was $ 157 million in 2013 and $ 168 million in 2012 .
these amounts are included in other interest income on our consolidated income statement .
additional information regarding our loan sale and servicing activities is included in note 3 loan sales and servicing activities and variable interest entities and note 9 fair value in our notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report .
goodwill and other intangible assets goodwill and other intangible assets totaled $ 11.3 billion at december 31 , 2013 and $ 10.9 billion at december 31 , 2012 .
the increase of $ .4 billion was primarily due to additions to and changes in value of mortgage and other loan servicing rights .
see additional information regarding our goodwill and intangible assets in note 10 goodwill and other intangible assets included in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .
44 the pnc financial services group , inc .
2013 form 10-k .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the gross margin decline in fiscal 2004 from 2003?

Pre-table text:
net sales of the retail segment grew to $ 1.185 billion during 2004 from $ 621 million and $ 283 million , in 2003 and 2002 , respectively .
the increases in net sales during both 2004 and 2003 reflect the impact of new store openings for each fiscal year , including the opening of 21 new stores in 2004 and 25 new stores in 2003 .
an increase in average revenue per store also contributed to the segment 2019s strong sales in fiscal 2004 .
with an average of 76 stores open during 2004 , the retail segment achieved annualized revenue per store of approximately $ 15.6 million , as compared to $ 11.5 million in 2003 with a 54 store average and $ 10.2 million in 2002 with a 28 store average .
as measured by the company 2019s operating segment reporting , the retail segment reported profit of $ 39 million during fiscal 2004 as compared to losses of $ 5 million and $ 22 million during 2003 and 2002 , respectively .
this improvement is primarily attributable to the segment 2019s year-over-year increase in average quarterly revenue per store , the impact of opening new stores , and the segment 2019s year-over-year increase in net sales , which resulted in higher leverage on occupancy , depreciation and other fixed costs .
expansion of the retail segment has required and will continue to require a substantial investment in fixed assets and related infrastructure , operating lease commitments , personnel , and other operating expenses .
capital expenditures associated with the retail segment were $ 104 million in fiscal 2004 , bringing the total capital expenditures since inception of the retail segment to approximately $ 394 million .
as of september 25 , 2004 , the retail segment had approximately 2100 employees and had outstanding operating lease commitments associated with retail store space and related facilities of approximately $ 436 million .
the company would incur substantial costs should it choose to terminate its retail segment or close individual stores .
such costs could adversely affect the company 2019s results of operations and financial condition .
gross margin gross margin for the three fiscal years ended september 25 , 2004 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : .

Table:
	2004	2003	2002
net sales	$ 8279	$ 6207	$ 5742
cost of sales	6020	4499	4139
gross margin	$ 2259	$ 1708	$ 1603
gross margin percentage	27.3% ( 27.3 % )	27.5% ( 27.5 % )	27.9% ( 27.9 % )

Post-table text:
gross margin declined in fiscal 2004 to 27.3% ( 27.3 % ) of net sales from 27.5% ( 27.5 % ) of net sales in 2003 .
the company 2019s gross margin during fiscal 2004 declined due to an increase in mix towards lower margin ipod and ibook sales , pricing actions on certain power macintosh g5 models that were transitioned during the beginning of 2004 , higher warranty costs on certain portable macintosh products , and higher freight and duty costs during fiscal 2004 .
these unfavorable factors were partially offset by an increase in direct sales and a 39% ( 39 % ) year-over-year increase in higher margin software sales .
the company anticipates that its gross margin and the gross margin of the overall personal computer and consumer electronics industries will remain under pressure throughout fiscal 2005 in light of price competition , especially for the ipod product line .
the company also expects to continue to incur air freight charges , which negatively impact gross margins on the imac and other products during the first quarter of 2005 and possibly beyond .
the foregoing statements regarding the company 2019s expected gross margin during 2005 , general demand for personal computers , anticipated air freight charges , and future economic conditions are forward- looking .
there can be no assurance that current gross margins will be maintained or targeted gross margin levels will be achieved .
in general , gross margins and margins on individual products , including ipods , will remain under significant downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage of total purchase commitments are due after 2014?

Pre-table text:
purchase commitments the company has entered into various purchase agreements for minimum amounts of pulpwood processing and energy over periods ranging from one to twenty years at fixed prices .
total purchase commitments are as follows: .

Table:
	( in thousands )
2010	$ 6951
2011	5942
2012	3659
2013	1486
2014	1486
thereafter	25048
total	$ 44572

Post-table text:
these purchase agreements are not marked to market .
the company purchased $ 37.3 million , $ 29.4 million , and $ 14.5 million during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , under these purchase agreements .
litigation pca is a party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business .
these legal actions cover a broad variety of claims spanning our entire business .
as of the date of this filing , the company believes it is not reasonably possible that the resolution of these legal actions will , individually or in the aggregate , have a material adverse effect on its financial position , results of operations , or cash flows .
environmental liabilities the potential costs for various environmental matters are uncertain due to such factors as the unknown magnitude of possible cleanup costs , the complexity and evolving nature of governmental laws and regulations and their interpretations , and the timing , varying costs and effectiveness of alternative cleanup technologies .
from 1994 through 2009 , remediation costs at the company 2019s mills and corrugated plants totaled approximately $ 3.2 million .
as of december 31 , 2009 , the company maintained an environmental reserve of $ 9.1 million relating to on-site landfills ( see note 13 ) and surface impoundments as well as ongoing and anticipated remedial projects .
liabilities recorded for environmental contingencies are estimates of the probable costs based upon available information and assumptions .
because of these uncertainties , pca 2019s estimates may change .
as of the date of this filing , the company believes that it is not reasonably possible that future environmental expenditures and asset retirement obligations above the $ 9.1 million accrued as of december 31 , 2009 , will have a material impact on its financial condition , results of operations , or cash flows .
in connection with the sale to pca of its containerboard and corrugated products business , pactiv agreed to retain all liability for all former facilities and all sites associated with pre-closing off-site waste disposal and all environmental liabilities related to a closed landfill located near the company 2019s filer city mill .
13 .
asset retirement obligations asset retirement obligations consist primarily of landfill capping and closure and post-closure costs .
pca is legally required to perform capping and closure and post-closure care on the landfills at each of the company 2019s mills .
in accordance with asc 410 , 201c asset retirement and environmental obligations , 201d pca recognizes the fair value of these liabilities as an asset retirement obligation for each landfill and capitalizes packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2009 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2012 to 2013 , in millions?

Pre-table text:
note 2 2013 restructuring charges 2013 actions during 2013 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 201 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 83 million , $ 37 million , and $ 81 million related to our information systems & global solutions ( is&gs ) , mission systems and training ( mst ) , and space systems business segments .
these charges reduced our net earnings by $ 130 million ( $ .40 per share ) and primarily related to a plan we committed to in november 2013 to close and consolidate certain facilities and reduce our total workforce by approximately 4000 positions within our is&gs , mst , and space systems business segments .
these charges also include $ 30 million related to certain severance actions at our is&gs business segment that occurred in the first quarter of 2013 , which were subsequently paid in 2013 .
the november 2013 plan resulted from a strategic review of these businesses 2019 facility capacity and future workload projections and is intended to better align our organization and cost structure and improve the affordability of our products and services given the continued decline in u.s .
government spending as well as the rapidly changing competitive and economic landscape .
upon separation , terminated employees will receive lump-sum severance payments primarily based on years of service .
during 2013 , we paid approximately $ 15 million in severance payments associated with these actions , with the remainder expected to be paid through the middle of 2015 .
in addition to the severance charges described above , we expect to incur accelerated and incremental costs ( e.g. , accelerated depreciation expense related to long-lived assets at the sites to be closed , relocation of equipment and other employee related costs ) of approximately $ 15 million , $ 50 million , and $ 135 million at our is&gs , mst , and space systems business segments related to the facility closures and consolidations .
the accelerated and incremental costs will be expensed as incurred in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations through their completion in 2015 .
we expect to recover a substantial amount of the restructuring charges through the pricing of our products and services to the u.s .
government and other customers in future periods , with the impact included in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations .
2012 and 2011 actions during 2012 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 48 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 25 million related to our aeronautics business segment and $ 23 million related to the reorganization of our former electronic systems business segment .
these charges reduced our net earnings by $ 31 million ( $ .09 per share ) and consisted of severance costs associated with the elimination of certain positions through either voluntary or involuntary actions .
these severance actions resulted from cost reduction initiatives to better align our organization with changing economic conditions .
upon separation , terminated employees received lump-sum severance payments primarily based on years of service , all of which were paid in 2013 .
during 2011 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 136 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 49 million , $ 48 million , and $ 39 million related to our aeronautics , space systems , and our is&gs business segments and corporate headquarters .
these charges reduced our net earnings by $ 88 million ( $ .26 per share ) and consisted of severance costs associated with the elimination of certain positions through either voluntary or involuntary actions .
these severance actions resulted from a strategic review of these businesses and our corporate headquarters and are intended to better align our organization and cost structure with changing economic conditions .
the workforce reductions at the business segments also reflected changes in program lifecycles , where several of our major programs were either transitioning out of development and into production or were ending .
upon separation , terminated employees received lump-sum severance payments based on years of service .
during 2011 , we made approximately half of the severance payments associated with these 2011 severance actions , and paid the remaining amounts in 2012 .
note 3 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2013	2012	2011
weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations	320.9	323.7	335.9
weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards	5.6	4.7	4.0
weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations	326.5	328.4	339.9

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in 2011 what was the amount of tax related to the unrealized losses reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax,

Pre-table text:
impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: .

Table:
( in millions )	2011	2010
fair value	$ 99832	$ 81881
amortized cost	100013	82329
net unrealized loss pre-tax	$ -181 ( 181 )	$ -448 ( 448 )
net unrealized loss after-tax	$ -113 ( 113 )	$ -270 ( 270 )

Post-table text:
the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .
these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci .
refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 .
the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization .
we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .
to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .
the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security .
our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors .
such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .
to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .
given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s .
housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance .
as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices .
generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears .
as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current .
overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough .
the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate .
in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above .
the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations .
our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses .
ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security .
in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s .
residential mortgage-backed portfolio .
we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above .
this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults .
to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated .
excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
if current development costs increased in 2008 as much as in 2007 , what would the 2008 total be , in millions?

Pre-table text:
supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) c o n t i n u e d summary of changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 sales and transfers of oil and gas produced , net of production , transportation and administrative costs $ ( 4887 ) $ ( 5312 ) $ ( 3754 ) net changes in prices and production , transportation and administrative costs related to future production 12845 ( 1342 ) 6648 .

Table:
( in millions )	2007	2006	2005
sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production transportation and administrative costs	$ -4887 ( 4887 )	$ -5312 ( 5312 )	$ -3754 ( 3754 )
net changes in prices and production transportation and administrative costs related to future production	12845	-1342 ( 1342 )	6648
extensions discoveries and improved recovery less related costs	1816	1290	700
development costs incurred during the period	1654	1251	1030
changes in estimated future development costs	-1727 ( 1727 )	-527 ( 527 )	-552 ( 552 )
revisions of previous quantity estimates	290	1319	820
net changes in purchases and sales of minerals in place	23	30	4557
accretion of discount	1726	1882	1124
net change in income taxes	-6751 ( 6751 )	-660 ( 660 )	-6694 ( 6694 )
timing and other	-12 ( 12 )	-14 ( 14 )	307
net change for the year	4977	-2083 ( 2083 )	4186
beginning of year	8518	10601	6415
end of year	$ 13495	$ 8518	$ 10601
net change for the year from discontinued operations	$ 2013	$ -216 ( 216 )	$ 162

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage of total aggregate contractual obligations is due to purchase obligationst?

Pre-table text:
table of contents item 7 2013 management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources we recorded net earnings of $ 35.4 million or $ 1.18 per share in 2004 , compared with $ 52.2 million or $ 1.76 per share recorded in 2003 and $ 51.3 million or $ 1.86 per share in 2002 .
net earnings recorded in 2004 were negatively impacted by cost increases to steel and freight , as well as manufacturing inefficiencies during the first nine months of the year in our ashland city plant and higher selling , general and administrative expense ( sg&a ) .
while net earnings were flat in 2003 compared with 2002 , the lower earnings per share amount in 2003 as compared with 2002 reflected the full-year impact of our stock offering in may 2002 .
our individual segment performance will be discussed later in this section .
our working capital , excluding short-term debt , was $ 339.8 million at december 31 , 2004 , compared with $ 305.9 million and $ 225.1 million at december 31 , 2003 , and december 31 , 2002 , respectively .
the $ 33.9 million increase in 2004 reflects $ 44.9 million higher receivable balances due to longer payment terms experienced by both of our businesses as well as higher sales levels in the fourth quarter .
offsetting the increase in receivable balances were $ 13.5 million lower inventory levels split about equally between water systems and electrical products and $ 14.3 million higher accounts payable balances .
the $ 80.8 million increase in 2003 reflects $ 46.6 million higher inventory balances due primarily to extensive manufacturing repositioning in our electric motor business and several new product introductions and manufacturing consolidation in our water systems business .
additionally , receivable balances were $ 21.2 million higher due to price increases associated with new product introductions in our water systems business and an increase in international sales , which tend to have longer payment terms .
finally , a $ 13.1 million increase in accounts payable balances was largely offset by $ 9.4 million in restructuring expenses paid out in 2003 .
reducing working capital is one of our major initiatives in 2005 .
cash provided by operating activities during 2004 was $ 67.2 million compared with $ 29.0 million during 2003 and $ 116.0 million during 2002 .
despite lower earnings in 2004 , a smaller investment in working capital explains the majority of the improvement in cash flow compared with 2003 .
the higher investment in working capital in 2003 ( as discussed above ) , explains the majority of the difference between 2003 and our capital expenditures were $ 48.5 million in 2004 , essentially the same as in 2003 and approximately $ 2.2 million higher than in 2002 .
the increase in 2003 was associated with new product launches in our water systems business .
we are projecting 2005 capital expenditures to be approximately $ 55 million , essentially the same as our projected 2005 depreciation expense .
we believe that our present facilities and planned capital expenditures are sufficient to provide adequate capacity for our operations in 2005 .
in june 2004 , we completed a $ 265 million , five-year revolving credit facility with a group of eight banks .
the new facility expires on june 10 , 2009 , and it replaced a $ 250 million credit facility which expired on august 2 , 2004 , and was terminated on june 10 , 2004 .
the new facility backs up commercial paper and credit line borrowings .
as a result of the long-term nature of this facility , the commercial paper and credit line borrowings are now classified as long-term debt .
at december 31 , 2004 , we had available borrowing capacity of $ 153.9 million under this facility .
we believe that the combination of available borrowing capacity and operating cash flow will provide sufficient funds to finance our existing operations for the foreseeable future .
to take advantage of historically low long-term borrowing rates , we issued $ 50.0 million in senior notes with two insurance companies in june 2003 .
the notes range in maturity between 2013 and 2016 and carry a weighted average interest rate of slightly less than 4.5 percent .
the proceeds of the notes were used to repay commercial paper and borrowing under the credit facility .
our leverage , as measured by the ratio of total debt to total capitalization , was 32 percent at the end of 2004 and the end of 2003 .
aggregate contractual obligations a summary of our contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2004 , is as follows: .

Table:
( dollars in millions ) contractual obligation	( dollars in millions ) total	( dollars in millions ) less than 1 year	( dollars in millions ) 1 - 3 years	( dollars in millions ) 3 - 5 years	more than 5 years
long-term debt	$ 275.1	$ 8.6	$ 13.8	$ 138.2	$ 114.5
capital leases	6.0	2014	2014	6.0	2014
operating leases	62.9	14.4	20.7	11.6	16.2
purchase obligations	177.3	176.6	0.7	2014	2014
total	$ 521.3	$ 199.6	$ 35.2	$ 155.8	$ 130.7

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in 2010 what was the percentage change of the carrying amount of loan receivable net of the allowance

Pre-table text:
included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup .
in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield .
accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above .
in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield .
however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield .
where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method .
the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 .
the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .

Table:
in millions of dollars	accretable yield	carrying amount of loan receivable	allowance
beginning balance	$ 27	$ 920	$ 95
purchases ( 1 )	1	130	2014
disposals/payments received	-11 ( 11 )	-594 ( 594 )	2014
accretion	-44 ( 44 )	44	2014
builds ( reductions ) to the allowance	128	2014	-18 ( 18 )
increase to expected cash flows	-2 ( 2 )	19	2014
fx/other	17	-50 ( 50 )	2014
balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )	$ 116	$ 469	$ 77

Post-table text:
( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method .
these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date .
the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates .
( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percent of the total long-term debt obligations that was due after 2011

Pre-table text:
53management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in order to borrow funds under the 5-year credit facility , the company must be in compliance with various conditions , covenants and representations contained in the agreements .
the company was in compliance with the terms of the 5-year credit facility at december 31 , 2006 .
the company has never borrowed under its domestic revolving credit facilities .
utilization of the non-u.s .
credit facilities may also be dependent on the company's ability to meet certain conditions at the time a borrowing is requested .
contractual obligations , guarantees , and other purchase commitments contractual obligations summarized in the table below are the company's obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations ( assuming earliest possible exercise of put rights by holders ) , lease payment obligations , and purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2006 .
payments due by period ( 1 ) ( in millions ) total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 thereafter .

Table:
( in millions )	payments due by period ( 1 ) total	payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007	payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008	payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009	payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010	payments due by period ( 1 ) 2011	payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter
long-term debt obligations	$ 4134	$ 1340	$ 198	$ 4	$ 534	$ 607	$ 1451
lease obligations	2328	351	281	209	178	158	1151
purchase obligations	1035	326	120	26	12	12	539
total contractual obligations	$ 7497	$ 2017	$ 599	$ 239	$ 724	$ 777	$ 3141

Post-table text:
( 1 ) amounts included represent firm , non-cancelable commitments .
debt obligations : at december 31 , 2006 , the company's long-term debt obligations , including current maturities and unamortized discount and issue costs , totaled $ 4.1 billion , as compared to $ 4.0 billion at december 31 , 2005 .
a table of all outstanding long-term debt securities can be found in note 4 , ""debt and credit facilities'' to the company's consolidated financial statements .
lease obligations : the company owns most of its major facilities , but does lease certain office , factory and warehouse space , land , and information technology and other equipment under principally non-cancelable operating leases .
at december 31 , 2006 , future minimum lease obligations , net of minimum sublease rentals , totaled $ 2.3 billion .
rental expense , net of sublease income , was $ 241 million in 2006 , $ 250 million in 2005 and $ 205 million in 2004 .
purchase obligations : the company has entered into agreements for the purchase of inventory , license of software , promotional agreements , and research and development agreements which are firm commitments and are not cancelable .
the longest of these agreements extends through 2015 .
total payments expected to be made under these agreements total $ 1.0 billion .
commitments under other long-term agreements : the company has entered into certain long-term agreements to purchase software , components , supplies and materials from suppliers .
most of the agreements extend for periods of one to three years ( three to five years for software ) .
however , generally these agreements do not obligate the company to make any purchases , and many permit the company to terminate the agreement with advance notice ( usually ranging from 60 to 180 days ) .
if the company were to terminate these agreements , it generally would be liable for certain termination charges , typically based on work performed and supplier on-hand inventory and raw materials attributable to canceled orders .
the company's liability would only arise in the event it terminates the agreements for reasons other than ""cause.'' the company also enters into a number of arrangements for the sourcing of supplies and materials with minimum purchase commitments and take-or-pay obligations .
the majority of the minimum purchase obligations under these contracts are over the life of the contract as opposed to a year-by-year take-or-pay .
if these agreements were terminated at december 31 , 2006 , the company's obligation would not have been significant .
the company does not anticipate the cancellation of any of these agreements in the future .
subsequent to the end of 2006 , the company entered into take-or-pay arrangements with suppliers through may 2009 with minimum purchase obligations of $ 2.2 billion during that period .
the company estimates purchases during that period that exceed the minimum obligations .
the company outsources certain corporate functions , such as benefit administration and information technology-related services .
these contracts are expected to expire in 2013 .
the total remaining payments under these contracts are approximately $ 1.3 billion over the remaining seven years ; however , these contracts can be %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c11830 pcn : 055000000 *** %%pcmsg| |00030|yes|no|02/28/2007 13:05|0|1|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the decline from current future minimum lease payments and the following years expected obligation?\\n

Pre-table text:
abiomed , inc .
and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( 7 ) commitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no .
45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no .
5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no .
34 ( fin no .
45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses .
these disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no .
5 accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote .
the following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor .
product warranties 2014the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale .
the ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards .
operating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision .
patent indemnifications 2014in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products .
the indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims .
the company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions .
under the provisions of fin no .
45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only .
as of march 31 , 2006 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 .
the danvers lease may be extended , at the company 2019s option , for two successive additional periods of five years each with monthly rent charges to be determined based on then current fair rental values .
the company 2019s lease for its aachen location expires in august 2008 unless an option to extend for an additional four years is exercised by the company .
in december 2005 we closed our office facility in the netherlands , recording a charge of approximately $ 58000 for the remaining lease term .
total rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations approximated $ 821000 , $ 824000 and $ 1262000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2004 , 2005 and 2006 , respectively .
future minimum lease payments under all significant non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2006 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : fiscal year ending march 31 , operating leases .

Table:
fiscal year ending march 31,	operating leases
2007	1703
2008	1371
2009	1035
2010	710
total future minimum lease payments	$ 4819

Post-table text:
from time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types .
while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , cash flow and results .
on may 15 , 2006 richard a .
nazarian , as selling stockholder representative , filed a demand for arbitration ( subsequently amended ) with the boston office of the american arbitration association .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the applied 2019s net sales in 2018 , ( in billions ) ?

Pre-table text:
backlog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments .
backlog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months .
backlog by reportable segment as of october 27 , 2013 and october 28 , 2012 was as follows : 2013 2012 ( in millions , except percentages ) .

Table:
	2013	2012		( in millions except percentages )
silicon systems group	$ 1295	55% ( 55 % )	$ 705	44% ( 44 % )
applied global services	591	25% ( 25 % )	580	36% ( 36 % )
display	361	15% ( 15 % )	206	13% ( 13 % )
energy and environmental solutions	125	5% ( 5 % )	115	7% ( 7 % )
total	$ 2372	100% ( 100 % )	$ 1606	100% ( 100 % )

Post-table text:
applied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or cancellation of orders .
customers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties .
delays in delivery schedules and/or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations .
manufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies ( collectively , parts ) that are used to manufacture systems .
applied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including the united states , europe , israel , singapore , taiwan , and other countries in asia , and assembly of some systems is completed at customer sites .
applied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products .
although applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible .
accordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers .
applied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by : ( 1 ) selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; ( 2 ) monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; ( 3 ) maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; ( 4 ) qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ( 5 ) locating certain manufacturing operations in close proximity to suppliers and customers .
research , development and engineering applied 2019s long-term growth strategy requires continued development of new products .
the company 2019s significant investment in research , development and engineering ( rd&e ) has generally enabled it to deliver new products and technologies before the emergence of strong demand , thus allowing customers to incorporate these products into their manufacturing plans at an early stage in the technology selection cycle .
applied works closely with its global customers to design systems and processes that meet their planned technical and production requirements .
product development and engineering organizations are located primarily in the united states , as well as in europe , israel , taiwan , and china .
in addition , applied outsources certain rd&e activities , some of which are performed outside the united states , primarily in india .
process support and customer demonstration laboratories are located in the united states , china , taiwan , europe , and israel .
applied 2019s investments in rd&e for product development and engineering programs to create or improve products and technologies over the last three years were as follows : $ 1.3 billion ( 18 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2013 , $ 1.2 billion ( 14 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2012 , and $ 1.1 billion ( 11 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2011 .
applied has spent an average of 14 percent of net sales in rd&e over the last five years .
in addition to rd&e for specific product technologies , applied maintains ongoing programs for automation control systems , materials research , and environmental control that are applicable to its products. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the average amortization amount , in millions , from 2015-2019?

Pre-table text:
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) asset divestitures in conjunction with the asset divestitures in 2013 and 2014 , devon removed $ 26 million and $ 706 million of goodwill , respectively , which were allocated to these assets .
impairment devon 2019s canadian goodwill was originally recognized in 2001 as a result of a business combination consisting almost entirely of conventional gas assets that devon no longer owns .
as a result of performing the goodwill impairment test described in note 1 , devon concluded the implied fair value of its canadian goodwill was zero as of december 31 , 2014 .
this conclusion was largely based on the significant decline in benchmark oil prices , particularly after opec 2019s decision not to reduce its production targets that was announced in late november 2014 .
consequently , in the fourth quarter of 2014 , devon wrote off its remaining canadian goodwill and recognized a $ 1.9 billion impairment .
other intangible assets as of december 31 , 2014 , intangible assets associated with customer relationships had a gross carrying amount of $ 569 million and $ 36 million of accumulated amortization .
the weighted-average amortization period for the customer relationships is 13.7 years .
amortization expense for intangibles was approximately $ 36 million for the year ended december 31 , 2014 .
other intangible assets are reported in other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .
the following table summarizes the estimated aggregate amortization expense for the next five years .
year amortization amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
year	amortization amount ( in millions )
2015	$ 45
2016	$ 45
2017	$ 45
2018	$ 45
2019	$ 44

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the ratio of the pension trust assets for 2017 to 2018

Pre-table text:
72 s&p global 2018 annual report .

Table:
( in millions )	level 3
balance as of december 31 2017	$ 39
purchases	2014
distributions	-2 ( 2 )
gain ( loss )	2
balance as of december 31 2018	$ 39

Post-table text:
for securities that are quoted in active markets , the trustee/ custodian determines fair value by applying securities 2019 prices obtained from its pricing vendors .
for commingled funds that are not actively traded , the trustee applies pricing information provided by investment management firms to the unit quantities of such funds .
investment management firms employ their own pricing vendors to value the securities underlying each commingled fund .
underlying securities that are not actively traded derive their prices from investment managers , which in turn , employ vendors that use pricing models ( e.g. , discounted cash flow , comparables ) .
the domestic defined benefit plans have no investment in our stock , except through the s&p 500 commingled trust index fund .
the trustee obtains estimated prices from vendors for securities that are not easily quotable and they are categorized accordingly as level 3 .
the following table details further information on our plan assets where we have used significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) : pension trusts 2019 asset allocations there are two pension trusts , one in the u.s .
and one in the u.k .
2022 the u.s .
pension trust had assets of $ 1572 million and $ 1739 million as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 respectively , and the target allocations in 2018 include 75% ( 75 % ) fixed income , 16% ( 16 % ) domestic equities and 9% ( 9 % ) international equities .
2022 the u.k .
pension trust had assets of $ 415 million and $ 480 million as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , and the target allocations in 2018 include 40% ( 40 % ) fixed income , 30% ( 30 % ) diversified growth funds , 20% ( 20 % ) equities and 10% ( 10 % ) real estate .
the pension assets are invested with the goal of producing a combination of capital growth , income and a liability hedge .
the mix of assets is established after consideration of the long- term performance and risk characteristics of asset classes .
investments are selected based on their potential to enhance returns , preserve capital and reduce overall volatility .
holdings are diversified within each asset class .
the portfolios employ a mix of index and actively managed equity strategies by market capitalization , style , geographic regions and economic sectors .
the fixed income strategies include u.s .
long duration securities , opportunistic fixed income securities and u.k .
debt instruments .
the short-term portfolio , whose primary goal is capital preservation for liquidity purposes , is composed of government and government-agency securities , uninvested cash , receivables and payables .
the portfolios do not employ any financial leverage .
u.s .
defined contribution plan assets of the defined contribution plan in the u.s .
consist primarily of investment options , which include actively managed equity , indexed equity , actively managed equity/bond funds , target date funds , s&p global inc .
common stock , stable value and money market strategies .
there is also a self-directed mutual fund investment option .
the plan purchased 193051 shares and sold 205798 shares of s&p global inc .
common stock in 2018 and purchased 228248 shares and sold 297750 shares of s&p global inc .
common stock in 2017 .
the plan held approximately 1.5 million shares of s&p global inc .
common stock as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , with market values of $ 251 million and $ 255 million , respectively .
the plan received dividends on s&p global inc .
common stock of $ 3 million during both the years ended december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 .
8 .
stock-based compensation we issue stock-based incentive awards to our eligible employees and directors under the 2002 employee stock incentive plan and a director deferred stock ownership plan .
2022 2002 employee stock incentive plan ( the 201c2002 plan 201d ) 2013 the 2002 plan permits the granting of nonqualified stock options , stock appreciation rights , performance stock , restricted stock and other stock-based awards .
in 2018 , we made a one-time issuance of incentive stock options under the 2002 plan to replace kensho employees 2019 stock options that were assumed in connection with our acquisition of kensho in april of 2018 .
2022 director deferred stock ownership plan 2013 under this plan , common stock reserved may be credited to deferred stock accounts for eligible directors .
in general , the plan requires that 50% ( 50 % ) of eligible directors 2019 annual compensation plus dividend equivalents be credited to deferred stock accounts .
each director may also elect to defer all or a portion of the remaining compensation and have an equivalent number of shares credited to the deferred stock account .
recipients under this plan are not required to provide consideration to us other than rendering service .
shares will be delivered as of the date a recipient ceases to be a member of the board of directors or within five years thereafter , if so elected .
the plan will remain in effect until terminated by the board of directors or until no shares of stock remain available under the plan. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}