[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percent of inventory is ready for liquidation ( sale ) in 2003?

Pre-table text:
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .
a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .
an impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .
federal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .
operating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .
period and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .
the unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .
respective years or of future results .
the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .
periods benefited , typically five years .
for approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .
the company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .
share .
the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .
new capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .
the pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .
( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .
each the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .
receive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .
inventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .
the net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .

Table:
	2003	2002
finished goods	$ 384.3	$ 206.7
raw materials and work in progress	90.8	50.9
inventory step-up	52.6	2013
inventories net	$ 527.7	$ 257.6

Post-table text:
made by zimmer to implex pursuant to their existing alliance raw materials and work in progress 90.8 50.9 arrangement , escrow and other items .
the acquisition will be inventory step-up 52.6 2013 accounted for under the purchase method of accounting .
inventories , net $ 527.7 $ 257.6 reserves for obsolete and slow-moving inventory at4 .
change in accounting principle december 31 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 47.4 million and instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic $ 45.5 million , respectively .
provisions charged to expense surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical were $ 11.6 million , $ 6.0 million and $ 11.9 million for the procedures .
effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .
recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , amounts written off against the reserve were $ 11.7 million , plant and equipment .
undeployed instruments are carried at $ 7.1 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .
instruments in the december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .
field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .
following the acquisition of centerpulse , the company depreciation is computed using the straight-line method established a common approach for estimating excess based on average estimated useful lives , determined inventory and instruments .
this change in estimate resulted principally in reference to associated product life cycles , in a charge to earnings of $ 3.0 million after tax in the fourth primarily five years .
in accordance with sfas no .
144 , the quarter .
company reviews instruments for impairment whenever .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the total value of net operating loss carryforwards?

Pre-table text:
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) at december 31 , 2005 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income of approximately $ 2.2 billion and $ 2.4 billion , respectively .
if not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
years ended december 31,	federal	state
2006 to 2010	$ 5248	$ 469747
2011 to 2015	10012	272662
2016 to 2020	397691	777707
2021 to 2025	1744552	897896
total	$ 2157503	$ 2418012

Post-table text:
sfas no .
109 , 201caccounting for income taxes , 201d requires that companies record a valuation allowance when it is 201cmore likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . 201d at december 31 , 2005 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 422.4 million , including approximately $ 249.5 million attributable to spectrasite , primarily related to net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards .
approximately $ 237.8 million of the spectrasite valuation allowance was assumed as of the acquisition date .
the balance of the valuation allowance primarily relates to net state deferred tax assets .
the company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining deferred tax assets , primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards , as management believes the company will have sufficient time to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period .
the company intends to recover a portion of its deferred tax asset through its federal income tax refund claims related to the carry back of certain federal net operating losses .
in june 2003 and october 2003 , the company filed federal income tax refund claims with the irs relating to the carry back of $ 380.0 million of net operating losses generated prior to 2003 , of which the company initially anticipated receiving approximately $ 90.0 million .
based on preliminary discussions with tax authorities , the company has revised its estimate of the net realizable value of the federal income tax refund claims and anticipates receiving a refund of approximately $ 65.0 million as a result of these claims by the end of 2006 .
there can be no assurances , however , with respect to the specific amount and timing of any refund .
the recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing stable state ( no growth ) projections based on its current operations .
the projections show a significant decrease in depreciation and interest expense in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period and debt repayments reducing interest expense .
accordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other non-routine transactions .
based on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized .
the realization of the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2005 will be dependent upon its ability to generate approximately $ 1.3 billion in taxable income from january 1 , 2006 to december 31 , 2025 .
if the company is unable to generate sufficient taxable income in the future , or carry back losses , as described above , it will be required to reduce its net deferred tax asset through a charge to income tax expense , which would result in a corresponding decrease in stockholders 2019 equity .
from time to time the company is subject to examination by various tax authorities in jurisdictions in which the company has significant business operations .
the company regularly assesses the likelihood of additional assessments in each of the tax jurisdictions resulting from these examinations .
during the year ended .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2016 to 2017?

Pre-table text:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .
( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .
( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .
the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .
entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term debt .
( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations .
( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 109 million at entergy louisiana and $ 34 million at system energy , long-term doe obligations of $ 181 million at entergy arkansas , and the note payable to nypa of $ 35 million at entergy , and includes debt due within one year .
fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .
the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Table:
	amount ( in thousands )
2016	$ 204079
2017	$ 766451
2018	$ 822690
2019	$ 768588
2020	$ 1631181

Post-table text:
in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .
entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .
these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .
in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .
this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .
as part of the purchase agreement with nypa , entergy recorded a liability representing the net present value of the payments entergy would be liable to nypa for each year that the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants would run beyond their respective original nrc license expiration date .
with the planned shutdown of fitzpatrick at the end of its current fuel cycle , entergy reduced this liability by $ 26.4 million in 2015 pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement .
under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .
entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2017 .
entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2018 .
entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2016 .
capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to: .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
share of total securities rated bbb/baa or below changed by how many percentage point between 2008 and 2009?

Pre-table text:
market street commitments by credit rating ( a ) december 31 , december 31 .

Table:
	december 31 2009	december 312008
aaa/aaa	14% ( 14 % )	19% ( 19 % )
aa/aa	50	6
a/a	34	72
bbb/baa	2	3
total	100% ( 100 % )	100% ( 100 % )

Post-table text:
( a ) the majority of our facilities are not explicitly rated by the rating agencies .
all facilities are structured to meet rating agency standards for applicable rating levels .
we evaluated the design of market street , its capital structure , the note , and relationships among the variable interest holders .
based on this analysis and under accounting guidance effective during 2009 and 2008 , we are not the primary beneficiary and therefore the assets and liabilities of market street are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .
we considered changes to the variable interest holders ( such as new expected loss note investors and changes to program- level credit enhancement providers ) , terms of expected loss notes , and new types of risks related to market street as reconsideration events .
we reviewed the activities of market street on at least a quarterly basis to determine if a reconsideration event has occurred .
tax credit investments we make certain equity investments in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies ( llcs ) that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the low income housing tax credit ( lihtc ) pursuant to sections 42 and 47 of the internal revenue code .
the purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital , to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings and to assist us in achieving goals associated with the community reinvestment act .
the primary activities of the investments include the identification , development and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants .
generally , these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity .
we typically invest in these partnerships as a limited partner or non-managing member .
also , we are a national syndicator of affordable housing equity ( together with the investments described above , the 201clihtc investments 201d ) .
in these syndication transactions , we create funds in which our subsidiaries are the general partner or managing member and sell limited partnership or non-managing member interests to third parties , and in some cases may also purchase a limited partnership or non-managing member interest in the fund .
the purpose of this business is to generate income from the syndication of these funds , generate servicing fees by managing the funds , and earn tax credits to reduce our tax liability .
general partner or managing member activities include selecting , evaluating , structuring , negotiating , and closing the fund investments in operating limited partnerships , as well as oversight of the ongoing operations of the fund portfolio .
we evaluate our interests and third party interests in the limited partnerships/llcs in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary .
the primary beneficiary determination is based on which party absorbs a majority of the variability .
the primary sources of variability in lihtc investments are the tax credits , tax benefits due to passive losses on the investments and development and operating cash flows .
we have consolidated lihtc investments in which we absorb a majority of the variability and thus are considered the primary beneficiary .
the assets are primarily included in equity investments and other assets on our consolidated balance sheet with the liabilities classified in other liabilities and third party investors 2019 interests included in the equity section as noncontrolling interests .
neither creditors nor equity investors in the lihtc investments have any recourse to our general credit .
the consolidated aggregate assets and liabilities of these lihtc investments are provided in the consolidated vies 2013 pnc is primary beneficiary table and reflected in the 201cother 201d business segment .
we also have lihtc investments in which we are not the primary beneficiary , but are considered to have a significant variable interest based on our interests in the partnership/llc .
these investments are disclosed in the non-consolidated vies 2013 significant variable interests table .
the table also reflects our maximum exposure to loss .
our maximum exposure to loss is equal to our legally binding equity commitments adjusted for recorded impairment and partnership results .
we use the equity and cost methods to account for our investment in these entities with the investments reflected in equity investments on our consolidated balance sheet .
in addition , we increase our recognized investments and recognize a liability for all legally binding unfunded equity commitments .
these liabilities are reflected in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .
credit risk transfer transaction national city bank , ( a former pnc subsidiary which merged into pnc bank , n.a .
in november 2009 ) sponsored a special purpose entity ( spe ) and concurrently entered into a credit risk transfer agreement with an independent third party to mitigate credit losses on a pool of nonconforming mortgage loans originated by its former first franklin business unit .
the spe was formed with a small equity contribution and was structured as a bankruptcy-remote entity so that its creditors have no recourse to us .
in exchange for a perfected security interest in the cash flows of the nonconforming mortgage loans , the spe issued to us asset-backed securities in the form of senior , mezzanine , and subordinated equity notes .
the spe was deemed to be a vie as its equity was not sufficient to finance its activities .
we were determined to be the primary beneficiary of the spe as we would absorb the majority of the expected losses of the spe through our holding of the asset-backed securities .
accordingly , this spe was consolidated and all of the entity 2019s assets , liabilities , and .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percentage increase in interest expense?

Pre-table text:
net revenues include $ 3.8 billion in 2017 and $ 739 million in 2016 related to the sale of rrps , mainly driven by japan .
these net revenue amounts include excise taxes billed to customers .
excluding excise taxes , net revenues for rrps were $ 3.6 billion in 2017 and $ 733 million in 2016 .
in some jurisdictions , including japan , we are not responsible for collecting excise taxes .
in 2017 , approximately $ 0.9 billion of our $ 3.6 billion in rrp net revenues , excluding excise taxes , were from iqos devices and accessories .
excise taxes on products increased by $ 1.1 billion , due to : 2022 higher excise taxes resulting from changes in retail prices and tax rates ( $ 4.6 billion ) , partially offset by 2022 favorable currency ( $ 1.9 billion ) and 2022 lower excise taxes resulting from volume/mix ( $ 1.6 billion ) .
our cost of sales ; marketing , administration and research costs ; and operating income were as follows : for the years ended december 31 , variance .

Table:
( in millions )	for the years ended december 31 , 2017	for the years ended december 31 , 2016	for the years ended december 31 , $	% (  % )
cost of sales	$ 10432	$ 9391	$ 1041	11.1% ( 11.1 % )
marketing administration and research costs	6725	6405	320	5.0% ( 5.0 % )
operating income	11503	10815	688	6.4% ( 6.4 % )

Post-table text:
cost of sales increased by $ 1.0 billion , due to : 2022 higher cost of sales resulting from volume/mix ( $ 1.1 billion ) , partly offset by 2022 lower manufacturing costs ( $ 36 million ) and 2022 favorable currency ( $ 30 million ) .
marketing , administration and research costs increased by $ 320 million , due to : 2022 higher expenses ( $ 570 million , largely reflecting increased investment behind reduced-risk products , predominately in the european union and asia ) , partly offset by 2022 favorable currency ( $ 250 million ) .
operating income increased by $ 688 million , due primarily to : 2022 price increases ( $ 1.4 billion ) , partly offset by 2022 higher marketing , administration and research costs ( $ 570 million ) and 2022 unfavorable currency ( $ 157 million ) .
interest expense , net , of $ 914 million increased by $ 23 million , due primarily to unfavorably currency and higher average debt levels , partly offset by higher interest income .
our effective tax rate increased by 12.8 percentage points to 40.7% ( 40.7 % ) .
the 2017 effective tax rate was unfavorably impacted by $ 1.6 billion due to the tax cuts and jobs act .
for further details , see item 8 , note 11 .
income taxes to our consolidated financial statements .
we are continuing to evaluate the impact that the tax cuts and jobs act will have on our tax liability .
based upon our current interpretation of the tax cuts and jobs act , we estimate that our 2018 effective tax rate will be approximately 28% ( 28 % ) , subject to future regulatory developments and earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction .
we are regularly examined by tax authorities around the world , and we are currently under examination in a number of jurisdictions .
it is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months certain tax examinations will close , which could result in a change in unrecognized tax benefits along with related interest and penalties .
an estimate of any possible change cannot be made at this time .
net earnings attributable to pmi of $ 6.0 billion decreased by $ 932 million ( 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) ) .
this decrease was due primarily to a higher effective tax rate as discussed above , partly offset by higher operating income .
diluted and basic eps of $ 3.88 decreased by 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) .
excluding .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the expected growth rate in amortization expense from 2016 to 2017?

Pre-table text:
table of contents the estimated amortization expense at september 26 , 2015 for each of the five succeeding fiscal years was as follows: .

Table:
fiscal 2016	$ 377.0
fiscal 2017	$ 365.6
fiscal 2018	$ 355.1
fiscal 2019	$ 343.5
fiscal 2020	$ 332.3

Post-table text:
goodwill in accordance with asc 350 , intangibles 2014goodwill and other ( asc 350 ) , the company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis and between annual tests if events and circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value .
events that could indicate impairment and trigger an interim impairment assessment include , but are not limited to , current economic and market conditions , including a decline in market capitalization , a significant adverse change in legal factors , business climate , operational performance of the business or key personnel , and an adverse action or assessment by a regulator .
in performing the impairment test , the company utilizes the two-step approach prescribed under asc 350 .
the first step requires a comparison of the carrying value of each reporting unit to its estimated fair value .
to estimate the fair value of its reporting units for step 1 , the company primarily utilizes the income approach .
the income approach is based on a dcf analysis and calculates the fair value by estimating the after-tax cash flows attributable to a reporting unit and then discounting the after-tax cash flows to a present value using a risk-adjusted discount rate .
assumptions used in the dcf require significant judgment , including judgment about appropriate discount rates and terminal values , growth rates , and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows .
the forecasted cash flows are based on the company 2019s most recent budget and strategic plan and for years beyond this period , the company 2019s estimates are based on assumed growth rates expected as of the measurement date .
the company believes its assumptions are consistent with the plans and estimates used to manage the underlying businesses .
the discount rates used are intended to reflect the risks inherent in future cash flow projections and are based on estimates of the weighted-average cost of capital ( 201cwacc 201d ) of market participants relative to each respective reporting unit .
the market approach considers comparable market data based on multiples of revenue or earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization ( 201cebitda 201d ) and is primarily used as a corroborative analysis to the results of the dcf analysis .
the company believes its assumptions used to determine the fair value of its reporting units are reasonable .
if different assumptions were used , particularly with respect to forecasted cash flows , terminal values , waccs , or market multiples , different estimates of fair value may result and there could be the potential that an impairment charge could result .
actual operating results and the related cash flows of the reporting units could differ from the estimated operating results and related cash flows .
if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value , the company is required to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of impairment loss , if any .
the second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of a reporting unit 2019s goodwill to its carrying value .
the implied fair value of goodwill is derived by performing a hypothetical purchase price allocation for each reporting unit as of the measurement date and allocating the reporting unit 2019s estimated fair value to its assets and liabilities .
the residual amount from performing this allocation represents the implied fair value of goodwill .
to the extent this amount is below the carrying value of goodwill , an impairment charge is recorded .
the company conducted its fiscal 2015 impairment test on the first day of the fourth quarter , and as noted above used dcf and market approaches to estimate the fair value of its reporting units as of june 28 , 2015 , and ultimately used the fair value determined by the dcf approach in making its impairment test conclusions .
the company believes it used reasonable estimates and assumptions about future revenue , cost projections , cash flows , market multiples and discount rates as of the measurement date .
as a result of completing step 1 , all of the company's reporting units had fair values exceeding their carrying values , and as such , step 2 of the impairment test was not required .
for illustrative purposes , had the fair value of each of the reporting units that passed step 1 been lower than 10% ( 10 % ) , all of the reporting units would still have passed step 1 of the goodwill impairment test .
at september 26 , 2015 , the company believes that each reporting unit , with goodwill aggregating 2.81 billion , was not at risk of failing step 1 of the goodwill impairment test based on the current forecasts .
the company conducted its fiscal 2014 annual impairment test on the first day of the fourth quarter , and as noted above used dcf and market approaches to estimate the fair value of its reporting units as of june 29 , 2014 , and ultimately used the fair value determined by the dcf approach in making its impairment test conclusions .
the company believes it used reasonable estimates and assumptions about future revenue , cost projections , cash flows , market multiples and discount rates as source : hologic inc , 10-k , november 19 , 2015 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely .
the user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information , except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law .
past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what are the payments for entergy arkansas as a percentage of payments for entergy louisiana?

Pre-table text:
payments ( receipts ) ( in millions ) .

Table:
	payments ( receipts ) ( in millions )
entergy arkansas	$ 2
entergy louisiana	$ 6
entergy mississippi	( $ 4 )
entergy new orleans	( $ 1 )
entergy texas	( $ 3 )

Post-table text:
in september 2016 the ferc accepted the february 2016 compliance filing subject to a further compliance filing made in november 2016 .
the further compliance filing was required as a result of an order issued in september 2016 ruling on the january 2016 rehearing requests filed by the lpsc , the apsc , and entergy .
in the order addressing the rehearing requests , the ferc granted the lpsc 2019s rehearing request and directed that interest be calculated on the payment/receipt amounts .
the ferc also granted the apsc 2019s and entergy 2019s rehearing request and ordered the removal of both securitized asset accumulated deferred income taxes and contra-securitization accumulated deferred income taxes from the calculation .
in november 2016 , entergy submitted its compliance filing in response to the ferc 2019s order on rehearing .
the compliance filing included a revised refund calculation of the true-up payments and receipts based on 2009 test year data and interest calculations .
the lpsc protested the interest calculations .
in november 2017 the ferc issued an order rejecting the november 2016 compliance filing .
the ferc determined that the payments detailed in the november 2016 compliance filing did not include adequate interest for the payments from entergy arkansas to entergy louisiana because it did not include interest on the principal portion of the payment that was made in february 2016 .
in december 2017 , entergy recalculated the interest pursuant to the november 2017 order .
as a result of the recalculations , entergy arkansas owed very minor payments to entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , and entergy new orleans .
2011 rate filing based on calendar year 2010 production costs in may 2011 , entergy filed with the ferc the 2011 rates in accordance with the ferc 2019s orders in the system agreement proceeding . a0 a0several parties intervened in the proceeding at the ferc , including the lpsc , which also filed a protest . a0 a0in july a02011 the ferc a0accepted entergy 2019s proposed rates for filing , a0effective june a01 , a02011 , a0subject to refund .
after an abeyance of the proceeding schedule , in december 2014 the ferc consolidated the 2011 rate filing with the 2012 , 2013 , and 2014 rate filings for settlement and hearing procedures .
see discussion below regarding the consolidated settlement and hearing procedures in connection with this proceeding .
2012 rate filing based on calendar year 2011 production costs in may 2012 , entergy filed with the ferc the 2012 rates in accordance with the ferc 2019s orders in the system agreement proceeding . a0 a0several parties intervened in the proceeding at the ferc , including the lpsc , which also filed a protest . a0 a0in august 2012 the ferc a0accepted entergy 2019s proposed rates for filing , a0effective june a02012 , a0subject to refund .
after an abeyance of the proceeding schedule , in december 2014 the ferc consolidated the 2012 rate filing with the 2011 , 2013 , and 2014 rate filings for settlement and hearing procedures .
see discussion below regarding the consolidated settlement and hearing procedures in connection with this proceeding .
2013 rate filing based on calendar year 2012 production costs in may 2013 , entergy filed with the ferc the 2013 rates in accordance with the ferc 2019s orders in the system agreement proceeding .
several parties intervened in the proceeding at the ferc , including the lpsc , which also filed a protest .
the city council intervened and filed comments related to including the outcome of a related ferc proceeding in the 2013 cost equalization calculation .
in august 2013 the ferc issued an order accepting the 2013 rates , effective june 1 , 2013 , subject to refund .
after an abeyance of the proceeding schedule , in december 2014 the ferc consolidated the 2013 rate filing with the 2011 , 2012 , and 2014 rate filings for settlement and hearing procedures .
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
as of december 31 , 2008 what was the percent of the total accounts payable and other liabilities that was accrued wages and vacation

Pre-table text:
when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use .
however , many of our assets are self-constructed .
a large portion of our capital expenditures is for track structure expansion ( capacity projects ) and replacement ( program projects ) , which is typically performed by our employees .
approximately 13% ( 13 % ) of our full-time equivalent employees are dedicated to the construction of capital assets .
costs that are directly attributable or overhead costs that relate directly to capital projects are capitalized .
direct costs that are capitalized as part of self-constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment .
indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset .
these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases .
the capitalization of indirect costs is consistent with fasb statement no .
67 , accounting for costs and initial rental operations of real estate projects .
general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred .
normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized .
assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .
amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .
10 .
accounts payable and other current liabilities dec .
31 , dec .
31 , millions of dollars 2008 2007 .

Table:
millions of dollars	dec . 31 2008	dec . 31 2007
accounts payable	$ 629	$ 732
accrued wages and vacation	367	394
accrued casualty costs	390	371
income and other taxes	207	343
dividends and interest	328	284
equipment rents payable	93	103
other	546	675
total accounts payable and other current liabilities	$ 2560	$ 2902

Post-table text:
11 .
fair value measurements during the first quarter of 2008 , we fully adopted fasb statement no .
157 , fair value measurements ( fas 157 ) .
fas 157 established a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements .
the adoption of fas 157 had no impact on our financial position or results of operations .
fas 157 applies to all assets and liabilities that are measured and reported on a fair value basis .
this enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values .
the statement requires that each asset and liability carried at fair value be classified into one of the following categories : level 1 : quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities .
level 2 : observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data .
level 3 : unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
for the period ending in 2016 , what was the average amount of settlements , in millions?

Pre-table text:
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

Table:
december 31,	2016	2015	2014
balance at january 1	$ 373	$ 394	$ 392
additions for current year tax positions	8	7	7
additions for tax positions of prior years	1	12	14
reductions for tax positions of prior years	-1 ( 1 )	-7 ( 7 )	-2 ( 2 )
effects of foreign currency translation	2	-7 ( 7 )	-3 ( 3 )
settlements	-13 ( 13 )	-19 ( 19 )	-2 ( 2 )
lapse of statute of limitations	-1 ( 1 )	-7 ( 7 )	-12 ( 12 )
balance at december 31	$ 369	$ 373	$ 394

Post-table text:
the company and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years .
the company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit recorded .
while it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position , we believe we have appropriately accrued for our uncertain tax benefits .
however , audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty .
it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may exceed our provision for current unrecognized tax benefits in amounts that could be material , but cannot be estimated as of december 31 , 2016 .
our effective tax rate and net income in any given future period could therefore be materially impacted .
22 .
discontinued operations brazil distribution 2014 due to a portfolio evaluation in the first half of 2016 , management has decided to pursue a strategic shift of its distribution companies in brazil , aes sul and eletropaulo .
the disposal of sul was completed in october 2016 .
in december 2016 , eletropaulo underwent a corporate restructuring which is expected to , among other things , provide more liquidity of its shares .
aes is continuing to pursue strategic options for eletropaulo in order to complete its strategic shift to reduce aes 2019 exposure to the brazilian distribution business , including preparation for listing its shares into the novo mercado , which is a listing segment of the brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance .
the company executed an agreement for the sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary aes sul in june 2016 .
we have reported the results of operations and financial position of aes sul as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented .
upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria , the company recognized an after tax loss of $ 382 million comprised of a pretax impairment charge of $ 783 million , offset by a tax benefit of $ 266 million related to the impairment of the sul long lived assets and a tax benefit of $ 135 million for deferred taxes related to the investment in aes sul .
prior to the impairment charge in the second quarter , the carrying value of the aes sul asset group of $ 1.6 billion was greater than its approximate fair value less costs to sell .
however , the impairment charge was limited to the carrying value of the long lived assets of the aes sul disposal group .
on october 31 , 2016 , the company completed the sale of aes sul and received final proceeds less costs to sell of $ 484 million , excluding contingent consideration .
upon disposal of aes sul , we incurred an additional after- tax loss on sale of $ 737 million .
the cumulative impact to earnings of the impairment and loss on sale was $ 1.1 billion .
this includes the reclassification of approximately $ 1 billion of cumulative translation losses , resulting in a net reduction to the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity of $ 92 million .
sul 2019s pretax loss attributable to aes for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 1.4 billion and $ 32 million , respectively .
sul 2019s pretax gain attributable to aes for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 133 million .
prior to its classification as discontinued operations , sul was reported in the brazil sbu reportable segment .
as discussed in note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies , effective july 1 , 2014 , the company prospectively adopted asu no .
2014-08 .
discontinued operations prior to adoption of asu no .
2014-08 include the results of cameroon , saurashtra and various u.s .
wind projects which were each sold in the first half of cameroon 2014 in september 2013 , the company executed agreements for the sale of its 56% ( 56 % ) equity interests in businesses in cameroon : sonel , an integrated utility , kribi , a gas and light fuel oil plant , and dibamba , a heavy .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage of total future principal payments of corporate debt are due after 2012?

Pre-table text:
before the purchase in november 2008 , the units will be reflected in diluted earnings per share calculations using the treasury stock method as defined by sfas no .
128 , earnings per share .
under this method , the number of shares of common stock used in calculating diluted earnings per share ( based on the settlement formula applied at the end of the reporting period ) is deemed to be increased by the excess , if any , of the number of shares that would be issued upon settlement of the purchase contracts less the number of shares that could be purchased by the company in the market at the average market price during the period using the proceeds to be received upon settlement .
therefore , dilution will occur for periods when the average market price of the company 2019s common stock for the reporting period is above $ 21.816 .
senior secured revolving credit facility in september 2005 , the company entered into a $ 250 million , three-year senior secured revolving credit facility .
as a result of the citadel investment in november 2007 , the facility was terminated and all unamortized debt issuance costs were expensed .
corporate debt covenants certain of the company 2019s corporate debt described above have terms which include customary financial covenants .
as of december 31 , 2007 , the company was in compliance with all such covenants .
early extinguishment of debt in 2006 , the company called the entire remaining $ 185.2 million principal amount of its 6% ( 6 % ) notes for redemption .
the company recorded a $ 0.7 million loss on early extinguishment of debt relating to the write-off of the unamortized debt offering costs .
the company did not have any early extinguishments of debt in 2005 .
other corporate debt the company also has multiple term loans from financial institutions .
these loans are collateralized by equipment and are included within other borrowings on the consolidated balance sheet .
see note 14 2014securities sold under agreement to repurchase and other borrowings .
future maturities of corporate debt scheduled principal payments of corporate debt as of december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( dollars in thousands ) : years ending december 31 .

Table:
2008	$ 2014
2009	2014
2010	2014
2011	453815
2012	2014
thereafter	2996337
total future principal payments of corporate debt	3450152
unamortized discount net	-427454 ( 427454 )
total corporate debt	$ 3022698

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage change in total net goodwill between 2010 and 2011?

Pre-table text:
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) h .
goodwill and other intangible assets ( continued ) goodwill at december 31 , accumulated impairment losses goodwill at december 31 , 2010 additions ( a ) discontinued operations ( b ) pre-tax impairment charge other ( c ) goodwill at december 31 , cabinets and related products .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 587 $ ( 364 ) $ 223 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ ( 44 ) $ 2 $ 181 .

Table:
	gross goodwill at december 31 2010	accumulated impairment losses	net goodwill at december 31 2010	additions ( a )	discontinued operations ( b )	pre-tax impairment charge	other ( c )	net goodwill at december 31 2011
cabinets and related products	$ 587	$ -364 ( 364 )	$ 223	$ 2014	$ 2014	$ -44 ( 44 )	$ 2	$ 181
plumbing products	536	-340 ( 340 )	196	9	2014	2014	-4 ( 4 )	201
installation and other services	1819	-762 ( 762 )	1057	2014	-13 ( 13 )	2014	2014	1044
decorative architectural products	294	2014	294	2014	2014	-75 ( 75 )	2014	219
other specialty products	980	-367 ( 367 )	613	2014	2014	-367 ( 367 )	2014	246
total	$ 4216	$ -1833 ( 1833 )	$ 2383	$ 9	$ -13 ( 13 )	$ -486 ( 486 )	$ -2 ( 2 )	$ 1891

Post-table text:
( a ) additions include acquisitions .
( b ) during 2011 , the company reclassified the goodwill related to the business units held for sale .
subsequent to the reclassification , the company recognized a charge for those business units expected to be divested at a loss ; the charge included a write-down of goodwill of $ 13 million .
( c ) other principally includes the effect of foreign currency translation and purchase price adjustments related to prior-year acquisitions .
in the fourth quarters of 2012 and 2011 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets .
the impairment test in 2012 indicated there was no impairment of goodwill for any of the company 2019s reporting units .
the impairment test in 2011 indicated that goodwill recorded for certain of the company 2019s reporting units was impaired .
the company recognized the non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges , in continuing operations , for goodwill of $ 486 million ( $ 330 million , after tax ) for 2011 .
in 2011 , the pre-tax impairment charge in the cabinets and related products segment relates to the european ready-to- assemble cabinet manufacturer and reflects the declining demand for certain products , as well as decreased operating margins .
the pre-tax impairment charge in the decorative architectural products segment relates to the builders 2019 hardware business and reflects increasing competitive conditions for that business .
the pre-tax impairment charge in the other specialty products segment relates to the north american window and door business and reflects the continuing weak level of new home construction activity in the western u.s. , the reduced levels of repair and remodel activity and the expectation that recovery in these segments will be modestly slower than anticipated .
the company then assessed the long-lived assets associated with these business units and determined no impairment was necessary at december 31 , 2011 .
other indefinite-lived intangible assets were $ 132 million and $ 174 million at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and principally included registered trademarks .
in 2012 and 2011 , the impairment test indicated that the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the other specialty products segment and the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the plumbing products segment ( 2011 only ) were impaired due to changes in the long-term outlook for the business units .
the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite- lived intangible assets of $ 42 million ( $ 27 million , after tax ) and $ 8 million ( $ 5 million , after tax ) in 2012 and 2011 , respectively .
in 2010 , the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite-lived intangible assets of $ 10 million ( $ 6 million after tax ) related to the installation and other services segment ( $ 9 million pre-tax ) and the plumbing products segment ( $ 1 million pre-tax ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
from the data given , how many square feet have an expiry date in 2020?

Pre-table text:
performance and revenue growth depends , in part , on the reliability and functionality of this infrastructure as a means of delivering human resources services .
the internet is a key mechanism for delivering our human resources services to our hr solutions clients efficiently and cost effectively .
our clients may not be receptive to human resource services delivered over the internet due to concerns regarding transaction security , user privacy , the reliability and quality of internet service and other reasons .
our clients 2019 concerns may be heightened by the fact we use the internet to transmit extremely confidential information about our clients and their employees , such as compensation , medical information and other personally identifiable information .
in order to maintain the level of security , service and reliability that our clients require , we may be required to make significant investments in our online methods of delivering human resources services .
in addition , websites and proprietary online services have experienced service interruptions and other delays occurring throughout their infrastructure .
the adoption of additional laws or regulations with respect to the internet may impede the efficiency of the internet as a medium of exchange of information and decrease the demand for our services .
if we cannot use the internet effectively to deliver our services , our revenue growth and results of operation may be impaired .
we may lose client data as a result of major catastrophes and other similar problems that may materially adversely impact our operations .
we have multiple processing centers around the world that use various commercial methods for disaster recovery capabilities .
our main data processing center is located near the aon hewitt headquarters in lincolnshire , illinois .
in the event of a disaster , our business continuity may not be sufficient , and the data recovered may not be sufficient for the administration of our clients 2019 human resources programs and processes .
item 1b .
unresolved staff comments .
item 2 .
properties .
we have offices in various locations throughout the world .
substantially all of our offices are located in leased premises .
we maintain our corporate headquarters at 200 e .
randolph street in chicago , illinois , where we occupy approximately 327000 square feet of space under an operating lease agreement that expires in 2013 .
there are two five-year renewal options at current market rates .
we own one building at pallbergweg 2-4 , amsterdam , the netherlands ( 150000 square feet ) .
the following are additional significant leased properties , along with the occupied square footage and expiration. .

Table:
property:	occupied square footage	lease expiration dates
4 overlook point and other locations lincolnshire illinois	1279000	2014 - 2019
2601 research forest drive the woodlands texas	414000	2020
2300 discovery drive orlando florida	364000	2020
devonshire square and other locations london uk	339000	2018 - 2028
199 water street new york new york	337000	2018
1000 n . milwaukee avenue glenview illinois	233000	2017
7201 hewitt associates drive charlotte north carolina	218000	2015

Post-table text:
7201 hewitt associates drive , charlotte , north carolina .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
218000 2015 the locations in lincolnshire , illinois , the woodlands , texas , orlando , florida , and charlotte north carolina , each of which were acquired as part of the hewitt acquisition , are primarily dedicated to our hr solutions business .
the other locations listed above house personnel from each of our business segments. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the difference in dollars of the high low sale price for the common stock in the fourth quarter of 2002?

Pre-table text:
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information .
the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated .
price range of common stock .

Table:
2002 first quarter	high $ 17.84	low $ 4.11	2001 first quarter	high $ 60.15	low $ 41.30
second quarter	9.17	3.55	second quarter	52.25	39.95
third quarter	4.61	1.56	third quarter	44.50	12.00
fourth quarter	3.57	0.95	fourth quarter	17.80	11.60

Post-table text:
holders .
as of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share .
dividends .
under the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends .
in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met .
the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries .
securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans .
see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in 2010 what was the ratio of the statutory capital and surplus to the statutory net income

Pre-table text:
n o t e s t o t h e c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s 2013 ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries excluded from adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding and assumed conversions is the impact of securities that would have been anti-dilutive during the respective years .
for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , the potential anti-dilutive share conversions were 256868 shares , 1230881 shares , and 638401 shares , respectively .
19 .
related party transactions the ace foundation 2013 bermuda is an unconsolidated not-for-profit organization whose primary purpose is to fund charitable causes in bermuda .
the trustees are principally comprised of ace management .
the company maintains a non-interest bear- ing demand note receivable from the ace foundation 2013 bermuda , the balance of which was $ 30 million and $ 31 million , at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .
the receivable is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .
the borrower has used the related proceeds to finance investments in bermuda real estate , some of which have been rented to ace employees at rates established by independent , professional real estate appraisers .
the borrower uses income from the investments to both repay the note and to fund charitable activities .
accordingly , the company reports the demand note at the lower of its principal value or the fair value of assets held by the borrower to repay the loan , including the real estate properties .
20 .
statutory financial information the company 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are subject to insurance laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which they operate .
these regulations include restrictions that limit the amount of dividends or other distributions , such as loans or cash advances , available to shareholders without prior approval of the insurance regulatory authorities .
there are no statutory restrictions on the payment of dividends from retained earnings by any of the bermuda subsidiaries as the minimum statutory capital and surplus requirements are satisfied by the share capital and additional paid-in capital of each of the bermuda subsidiaries .
the company 2019s u.s .
subsidiaries file financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulators .
statutory accounting differs from gaap in the reporting of certain reinsurance contracts , investments , subsidiaries , acquis- ition expenses , fixed assets , deferred income taxes , and certain other items .
the statutory capital and surplus of the u.s .
subsidiaries met regulatory requirements for 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 .
the amount of dividends available to be paid in 2011 , without prior approval from the state insurance departments , totals $ 850 million .
the following table presents the combined statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income of the bermuda and u.s .
subsidiaries at and for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008. .

Table:
( in millions of u.s . dollars )	bermuda subsidiaries 2010	bermuda subsidiaries 2009	bermuda subsidiaries 2008	bermuda subsidiaries 2010	bermuda subsidiaries 2009	2008
statutory capital and surplus	$ 11798	$ 9164	$ 6205	$ 6266	$ 5885	$ 5368
statutory net income	$ 2430	$ 2369	$ 2196	$ 1047	$ 904	$ 818

Post-table text:
as permitted by the restructuring discussed previously in note 7 , certain of the company 2019s u.s .
subsidiaries discount certain a&e liabilities , which increased statutory capital and surplus by approximately $ 206 million , $ 215 million , and $ 211 million at december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , respectively .
the company 2019s international subsidiaries prepare statutory financial statements based on local laws and regulations .
some jurisdictions impose complex regulatory requirements on insurance companies while other jurisdictions impose fewer requirements .
in some countries , the company must obtain licenses issued by governmental authorities to conduct local insurance business .
these licenses may be subject to reserves and minimum capital and solvency tests .
jurisdictions may impose fines , censure , and/or criminal sanctions for violation of regulatory requirements. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percentage change in total debt from 2014 to 2015?

Pre-table text:
in addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs .
these credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries .
borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 .
commercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .
and in europe .
at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding .
effective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s .
was increased by $ 2.0 billion .
as a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .
and in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion .
we expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements .
sale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions .
these arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse .
the trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets .
we sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing .
pmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions .
the trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively .
the net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows .
for further details , see item 8 , note 23 .
sale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements .
debt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 .
our total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature .
for further details , see item 8 , note 7 .
indebtedness .
the weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 .
see item 8 , note 16 .
fair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt .
the amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors .
on february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s .
securities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period .
our debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s .
dollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s .
dollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 .
the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .
the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 .
2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .

Table:
type		face value	interest rate	issuance	maturity
u.s . dollar notes	( a )	$ 500	1.250% ( 1.250 % )	august 2015	august 2017
u.s . dollar notes	( a )	$ 750	3.375% ( 3.375 % )	august 2015	august 2025

Post-table text:
in addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs .
these credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries .
borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 .
commercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .
and in europe .
at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding .
effective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s .
was increased by $ 2.0 billion .
as a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .
and in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion .
we expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements .
sale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions .
these arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse .
the trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets .
we sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing .
pmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions .
the trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively .
the net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows .
for further details , see item 8 , note 23 .
sale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements .
debt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 .
our total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature .
for further details , see item 8 , note 7 .
indebtedness .
the weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 .
see item 8 , note 16 .
fair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt .
the amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors .
on february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s .
securities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period .
our debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s .
dollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s .
dollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 .
the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .
the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 .
2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the total return percentage for e*trade financial corporation for the five years ended 12/14?

Pre-table text:
the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2009 through december 31 , 2014. .

Table:
	12/09	12/10	12/11	12/12	12/13	12/14
e*trade financial corporation	100.00	90.91	45.23	50.85	111.59	137.81
s&p 500 index	100.00	115.06	117.49	136.30	180.44	205.14
dow jones us financials index	100.00	112.72	98.24	124.62	167.26	191.67

Post-table text:
table of contents .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the difference in operating profit for the americas as a percentage of net sales between 2001 and 2003?

Pre-table text:
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .
a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k the following table sets forth the operating profit margin by cost of products sold .
included in cost of product sold are segment for the years ended december 31 , 2003 , losses on foreign exchange hedge contracts , which increased 2002 and 2001 : in 2003 relative to 2002 .
in the fourth quarter , the company reported operating profit as a percent of net sales of percent of net sales 47.1 percent for asia pacific. .

Table:
year ended december 31,	2003	2002	2001
americas	51.2% ( 51.2 % )	48.3% ( 48.3 % )	47.4% ( 47.4 % )
europe	26.3	24.4	19.5
asia pacific	45.3	46.1	45.4

Post-table text:
operating profit for the americas as a percentage of net sales increased to 48.3 percent in 2002 from 47.4 percent in year ended december 31 , 2003 2001 , reflecting improved gross profit margins due to higher compared to year ended december 31 , 2002 average selling prices and increased sales of higher margin operating profit for the americas as a percentage of net products , and lower selling expenses as a percent of sales sales increased due to improved gross margins driven by due to lower costs associated with the u.s .
distributor higher average selling prices and increased sales of higher network .
the americas continued to invest in strategic margin products , leveraged operating expenses and the initiatives such as mis technologies , field sales personnel , favorable impact of the change in accounting principle for medical education programs and new product launches .
instruments .
the change in accounting principle for operating profit for asia pacific as a percentage of net instruments increased operating profit by 1.7 percentage sales increased to 46.1 percent in 2002 from 45.4 percent points .
with respect to sales growth , increased zimmer in 2001 .
this increase reflects lower selling , general and standalone average selling prices of 4 percent in 2003 and administrative expenses as a percent of sales in japan as favorable effects of volume and mix , 15 percent increase in a result of a sales force and dealer reorganization , partially 2003 , represent the most significant factors in improved offset by lower gross profit margins as a result of lower yen operating profit in the americas .
as reconstructive implant hedge gains compared to 2001 .
sales grow at a higher rate than trauma and orthopaedic operating profit for europe as a percentage of net sales surgical products , operating profit margins generally tend to increased to 24.4 percent in 2002 from 19.5 percent in 2001 , improve since reconstructive product sales generally earn due to improved gross profit margins as a result of higher higher gross margins .
this was the case in 2003 , with zimmer average selling prices and favorable product and country mix , standalone reconstructive implant sales growth of 22 percent the leveraging of sales growth in europe on controlled as compared with total zimmer standalone sales growth of increases in operating expenses and improved efficiency 19 percent .
in the fourth quarter , the company reported in the utilization of instruments ( more frequent use of operating profit as a percent of net sales of 50.4 percent for instruments resulted in fewer placements and less expense ) .
the americas .
operating profit for europe as a percentage of net sales liquidity and capital resources increased due to improved gross profit margins driven by cash flows provided by operations were $ 494.8 million higher zimmer standalone average selling prices and in 2003 , compared with $ 220.2 million in 2002 .
the principal favorable product and country mix , leveraged operating source of cash was net earnings before cumulative effect of expenses and the favorable impact of the change in change in accounting principle of $ 291.2 million .
non-cash accounting principle for instruments .
the change in expenses for the period included depreciation and accounting for instruments increased operating profit by amortization expense of $ 103.3 million , centerpulse inventory 1.4 percentage points .
increases in zimmer standalone step-up of $ 42.7 million and centerpulse in-process research average selling prices in europe of 2 percent in 2003 and the and development write-offs of $ 11.2 million .
working capital effect of volume and mix , 19 percent increase in 2003 , were management , together with the collection of $ 20.0 million of the key factors in improved operating profit .
also cash related to centerpulse tax loss carryforwards , contributing to the improvement was significantly lower contributed $ 80.4 million to operating cash flow .
growth in operating expenses .
in the fourth quarter , the working capital continues to be a key management focus .
company reported operating profit as a percent of net sales at december 31 , 2003 , the company had 62 days of sales of 24.7 percent for europe .
outstanding in accounts receivable , unfavorable to the prior operating profit for asia pacific as a percentage of year by 10 days .
acquired centerpulse businesses had a net sales decreased primarily due to less favorable rates on negative impact of 10 days , due to centerpulse 2019s business hedge contracts during the year compared to the prior year , mix which has a greater proportion of european revenue with partially offset by increased zimmer standalone average payment terms generally longer than those in the u.s .
at selling prices and leveraged operating expenses .
the change december 31 , 2003 , the company had 232 days of inventory in accounting for instruments had an immaterial effect on on hand compared to 247 days reported at the end of 2002 .
operating profit for asia pacific .
increases in zimmer the reduction was principally due to improved inventory standalone average selling prices in asia pacific of 1 percent management and the acquired dental and spinal businesses and volume and mix improvements of 4 percent in 2003 carrying fewer days of inventory .
contributed modest improvement but was offset by higher .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the change in amount of long term debt between 2014 and 2012?

Pre-table text:
table of contents liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the years ended september 27 , 2014 , september 28 , 2013 and september 29 , 2012 ( in millions ) : the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months .
to provide additional flexibility in managing liquidity , the company began accessing the commercial paper markets in the third quarter of 2014 .
the company currently anticipates the cash used for future dividends and the share repurchase program will come from its current domestic cash , cash generated from on-going u.s .
operating activities and from borrowings .
as of september 27 , 2014 and september 28 , 2013 , $ 137.1 billion and $ 111.3 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s .
dollar-denominated holdings .
amounts held by foreign subsidiaries are generally subject to u.s .
income taxation on repatriation to the u.s .
the company 2019s marketable securities investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly-rated securities and its investment policy generally limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer .
the policy requires investments generally to be investment grade with the objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss .
during 2014 , cash generated from operating activities of $ 59.7 billion was a result of $ 39.5 billion of net income , non-cash adjustments to net income of $ 13.2 billion and an increase in net change in operating assets and liabilities of $ 7.0 billion .
cash used in investing activities of $ 22.6 billion during 2014 consisted primarily of cash used for purchases of marketable securities , net of sales and maturities , of $ 9.0 billion ; cash used to acquire property , plant and equipment of $ 9.6 billion ; and cash paid for business acquisitions , net of cash acquired , of $ 3.8 billion .
cash used in financing activities of $ 37.5 billion during 2014 consisted primarily of cash used to repurchase common stock of $ 45.0 billion and cash used to pay dividends and dividend equivalents of $ 11.1 billion , partially offset by net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and commercial paper of $ 12.0 billion and $ 6.3 billion , respectively .
during 2013 , cash generated from operating activities of $ 53.7 billion was a result of $ 37.0 billion of net income , non-cash adjustments to net income of $ 10.2 billion and an increase in net change in operating assets and liabilities of $ 6.5 billion .
cash used in investing activities of $ 33.8 billion during 2013 consisted primarily of cash used for purchases of marketable securities , net of sales and maturities , of $ 24.0 billion and cash used to acquire property , plant and equipment of $ 8.2 billion .
cash used in financing activities of $ 16.4 billion during 2013 consisted primarily of cash used to repurchase common stock of $ 22.9 billion and cash used to pay dividends and dividend equivalents of $ 10.6 billion , partially offset by net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt of $ 16.9 billion .
apple inc .
| 2014 form 10-k | 35 .

Table:
	2014	2013	2012
cash cash equivalents and marketable securities	$ 155239	$ 146761	$ 121251
property plant and equipment net	$ 20624	$ 16597	$ 15452
long-term debt	$ 28987	$ 16960	$ 0
working capital	$ 5083	$ 29628	$ 19111
cash generated by operating activities	$ 59713	$ 53666	$ 50856
cash used in investing activities	$ -22579 ( 22579 )	$ -33774 ( 33774 )	$ -48227 ( 48227 )
cash used in financing activities	$ -37549 ( 37549 )	$ -16379 ( 16379 )	$ -1698 ( 1698 )

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what amount of long-term debt due in the next 36 months as of december 31 , 2003 , in millions?

Pre-table text:
entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , certain series of which are secured by non-interest bearing first mortgage bonds .
( b ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1 , 2005 and can then be remarketed .
( c ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1 , 2004 and can then be remarketed .
( d ) the bonds had a mandatory tender date of october 1 , 2003 .
entergy louisiana purchased the bonds from the holders , pursuant to the mandatory tender provision , and has not remarketed the bonds at this time .
entergy louisiana used a combination of cash on hand and short-term borrowing to buy-in the bonds .
( e ) on june 1 , 2002 , entergy louisiana remarketed $ 55 million st .
charles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030 , resetting the interest rate to 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) through may 2005 .
( f ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1 , 2005 and can then be remarketed .
( g ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy's nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .
the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .
entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( h ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year .
it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms .
the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2003 , for the next five years are as follows: .

Table:
	( in thousands )
2004	$ 503215
2005	$ 462420
2006	$ 75896
2007	$ 624539
2008	$ 941625

Post-table text:
in november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .
entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .
these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .
in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .
this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 , and is included in the note payable to nypa balance above .
in july 2003 , a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa .
under a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the domestic utility companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .
covenants in the entergy corporation notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization .
if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other indebtedness or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the notes' maturity dates may occur. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the growth rate in operating profit for space systems in 2011?

Pre-table text:
2011 compared to 2010 mst 2019s net sales for 2011 decreased $ 311 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2010 .
the decrease was attributable to decreased volume of approximately $ 390 million for certain ship and aviation system programs ( primarily maritime patrol aircraft and ptds ) and approximately $ 75 million for training and logistics solutions programs .
partially offsetting these decreases was higher sales of about $ 165 million from production on the lcs program .
mst 2019s operating profit for 2011 decreased $ 68 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 .
the decrease was attributable to decreased operating profit of approximately $ 55 million as a result of increased reserves for contract cost matters on various ship and aviation system programs ( including the terminated presidential helicopter program ) and approximately $ 40 million due to lower volume and increased reserves on training and logistics solutions .
partially offsetting these decreases was higher operating profit of approximately $ 30 million in 2011 primarily due to the recognition of reserves on certain undersea systems programs in 2010 .
adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 55 million lower in 2011 compared to 2010 .
backlog backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders on ship and aviation system programs ( primarily mh-60 and lcs ) , partially offset decreased orders and higher sales volume on integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) .
backlog decreased slightly in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to higher sales volume on various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs .
trends we expect mst 2019s net sales to decline in 2013 in the low single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 due to the completion of ptds deliveries in 2012 and expected lower volume on training services programs .
operating profit and margin are expected to increase slightly from 2012 levels primarily due to anticipated improved contract performance .
space systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the research and development , design , engineering , and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems , and space transportation systems .
space systems is also responsible for various classified systems and services in support of vital national security systems .
space systems 2019 major programs include the space-based infrared system ( sbirs ) , advanced extremely high frequency ( aehf ) system , mobile user objective system ( muos ) , global positioning satellite ( gps ) iii system , geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) , trident ii d5 fleet ballistic missile , and orion .
operating results for our space systems business segment include our equity interests in united launch alliance ( ula ) , which provides expendable launch services for the u.s .
government , united space alliance ( usa ) , which provided processing activities for the space shuttle program and is winding down following the completion of the last space shuttle mission in 2011 , and a joint venture that manages the u.k . 2019s atomic weapons establishment program .
space systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2012	2011	2010
net sales	$ 8347	$ 8161	$ 8268
operating profit	1083	1063	1030
operating margins	13.0% ( 13.0 % )	13.0% ( 13.0 % )	12.5% ( 12.5 % )
backlog at year-end	18100	16000	17800

Post-table text:
2012 compared to 2011 space systems 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 186 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2011 .
the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 150 million due to increased commercial satellite deliveries ( two commercial satellites delivered in 2012 compared to one during 2011 ) ; about $ 125 million from the orion program due to higher volume and an increase in risk retirements ; and approximately $ 70 million from increased volume on various strategic and defensive missile programs .
partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 105 million from certain government satellite programs ( primarily sbirs and muos ) as a result of decreased volume and a decline in risk retirements ; and about $ 55 million from the nasa external tank program , which ended in connection with the completion of the space shuttle program in 2011. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}