[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the change in defined contribution plans expenses for the u.s . between 2015 and 2016 in millions?

Pre-table text:
zimmer biomet holdings , inc .
and subsidiaries 2017 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of our foreign pension plan assets measured at fair value that used significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	december 31 2017
beginning balance	$ 78.7
gains on assets sold	0.3
change in fair value of assets	3.8
net purchases and sales	5.2
translation gain	3.0
ending balance	$ 91.0

Post-table text:
we expect that we will have no legally required minimum funding requirements in 2018 for the qualified u.s .
and puerto rico defined benefit retirement plans , nor do we expect to voluntarily contribute to these plans during 2018 .
contributions to foreign defined benefit plans are estimated to be $ 17.0 million in 2018 .
we do not expect the assets in any of our plans to be returned to us in the next year .
defined contribution plans we also sponsor defined contribution plans for substantially all of the u.s .
and puerto rico employees and certain employees in other countries .
the benefits offered under these plans are reflective of local customs and practices in the countries concerned .
we expensed $ 47.9 million , $ 42.5 million and $ 40.2 million related to these plans for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .
15 .
income taxes 2017 tax act : the president signed u.s .
tax reform legislation ( 201c2017 tax act 201d ) on december 22 , 2017 , which is considered the enactment date .
the 2017 tax act includes a broad range of provisions , many of which significantly differ from those contained in previous u.s .
tax law .
changes in tax law are accounted for in the period of enactment .
as such , our 2017 consolidated financial statements reflect the immediate tax effect of the 2017 tax act .
the 2017 tax act contains several key provisions including , among other things : 2022 a one-time tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of post-1986 untaxed foreign earnings and profits ( e&p ) , referred to as the toll charge ; 2022 a reduction in the corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent for tax years beginning after december 31 , 2022 the introduction of a new u.s .
tax on certain off-shore earnings referred to as global intangible low-taxed income ( gilti ) at an effective tax rate of 10.5 percent for tax years beginning after december 31 , 2017 ( increasing to 13.125 percent for tax years beginning after december 31 , 2025 ) , with a partial offset by foreign tax credits ; and 2022 the introduction of a territorial tax system beginning in 2018 by providing a 100 percent dividend received deduction on certain qualified dividends from foreign subsidiaries .
during the fourth quarter of 2017 , we recorded an income tax benefit of $ 1272.4 million , which was comprised of the following : 2022 income tax benefit of $ 715.0 million for the one-time deemed repatriation of foreign earnings .
this is composed of a $ 1181.0 million benefit from the removal of a deferred tax liability we had recorded for the repatriation of foreign earnings prior to the 2017 tax act offset by $ 466.0 million for the toll charge recognized under the 2017 tax act .
in accordance with the 2017 tax act , we expect to elect to pay the toll charge in installments over eight years .
as of december 31 , 2017 , we have recorded current and non-current income tax liabilities related to the toll charge of $ 82.0 million and $ 384.0 million , respectively .
2022 an income tax benefit of $ 557.4 million , primarily related to the remeasurement of our deferred tax assets and liabilities at the enacted corporate income tax rate of 21 percent .
the net benefit recorded was based on currently available information and interpretations made in applying the provisions of the 2017 tax act as of the time of filing this annual report on form 10-k .
we further refined our estimates related to the impact of the 2017 tax act subsequent to the issuance of our earnings release for the fourth quarter of 2017 .
in accordance with authoritative guidance issued by the sec , the income tax effect for certain aspects of the 2017 tax act represent provisional amounts for which our accounting is incomplete , but with respect to which a reasonable estimate could be determined and recorded during the fourth quarter of 2017 .
the actual effects of the 2017 tax act and final amounts recorded may differ materially from our current estimate of provisional amounts due to , among other things , further interpretive guidance that may be issued by u.s .
tax authorities or regulatory bodies , including the sec and the fasb .
we will continue to analyze the 2017 tax act and any additional guidance that may be issued so we can finalize the full effects of applying the new legislation on our financial statements in the measurement period , which ends in the fourth quarter of 2018 .
we continue to evaluate the impacts of the 2017 tax act and consider the amounts recorded to be provisional .
in addition , we are still evaluating the gilti provisions of the 2017 tax act and their impact , if any , on our consolidated financial statements as of december 31 , 2017 .
the fasb allows companies to adopt an accounting policy to either recognize deferred taxes for gilti or treat such as a tax cost in the year incurred .
we have not yet determined which accounting policy to adopt because determining the impact of the gilti provisions requires analysis of our existing legal entity structure , the reversal of our u.s .
gaap and u.s .
tax basis differences in the assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries , and our ability to offset any tax with foreign tax credits .
as such , we did not record a deferred income tax .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage of total goodwill is attributable to retail bank reporting unit as december 31 , 2011?

Pre-table text:
judgments the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets depends on a number of factors , including estimates of future market growth and trends , forecasted revenue and costs , expected useful lives of the assets , appropriate discount rates and other variables .
goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments .
each of these reporting units is tested for impairment individually during the annual evaluation .
there is no goodwill assigned to reporting units within the balance sheet management segment .
the following table shows the amount of goodwill allocated to each of the reporting units in the trading and investing segment ( dollars in millions ) : .

Table:
reporting unit	december 31 2011
u.s . brokerage	$ 1751.2
capital markets	142.4
retail bank	40.6
total goodwill	$ 1934.2

Post-table text:
in connection with our annual impairment test of goodwill , we concluded that the goodwill was not impaired as the fair value of the reporting units was in excess of the book value of those reporting units as of december 31 , 2011 .
the fair value of the reporting units exceeded the book value of those reporting units by substantial amounts ( fair value as a percent of book value ranged from approximately 150% ( 150 % ) to 700% ( 700 % ) ) and therefore did not indicate a significant risk of goodwill impairment based on current projections and valuations .
we also evaluate the remaining useful lives on intangible assets each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization .
effects if actual results differ if our estimates of fair value for the reporting units change due to changes in our business or other factors , we may determine that an impairment charge is necessary .
estimates of fair value are determined based on a complex model using cash flows and company comparisons .
if management 2019s estimates of future cash flows are inaccurate , the fair value determined could be inaccurate and impairment would not be recognized in a timely manner .
intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives .
if changes in the estimated underlying revenue occur , impairment or a change in the remaining life may need to be recognized. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percent of total commitments expire in 1-3 years?

Pre-table text:
page 38 five years .
the amounts ultimately applied against our offset agreements are based on negotiations with the customer and generally require cash outlays that represent only a fraction of the original amount in the offset agreement .
at december 31 , 2005 , we had outstanding offset agreements totaling $ 8.4 bil- lion , primarily related to our aeronautics segment , that extend through 2015 .
to the extent we have entered into purchase obligations at december 31 , 2005 that also satisfy offset agree- ments , those amounts are included in the preceding table .
we have entered into standby letter of credit agreements and other arrangements with financial institutions and custom- ers mainly relating to advances received from customers and/or the guarantee of future performance on some of our contracts .
at december 31 , 2005 , we had outstanding letters of credit , surety bonds and guarantees , as follows : commitment expiration by period ( in millions ) commitment 1 year ( a ) years ( a ) standby letters of credit $ 2630 $ 2425 $ 171 $ 18 $ 16 .

Table:
( in millions )	commitment expiration by period total commitment	commitment expiration by period less than 1 year ( a )	commitment expiration by period 1-3 years ( a )	commitment expiration by period 3-5 years	commitment expiration by period after 5 years
standby letters of credit	$ 2630	$ 2425	$ 171	$ 18	$ 16
surety bonds	434	79	352	3	2014
guarantees	2	1	1	2014	2014
total commitments	$ 3066	$ 2505	$ 524	$ 21	$ 16

Post-table text:
( a ) approximately $ 2262 million and $ 49 million of standby letters of credit in the 201cless than 1 year 201d and 201c1-3 year 201d periods , respectively , and approximately $ 38 million of surety bonds in the 201cless than 1 year 201d period are expected to renew for additional periods until completion of the contractual obligation .
included in the table above is approximately $ 200 million representing letter of credit and surety bond amounts for which related obligations or liabilities are also recorded in the bal- ance sheet , either as reductions of inventories , as customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred , or as other liabilities .
approximately $ 2 billion of the standby letters of credit in the table above were to secure advance payments received under an f-16 contract from an international cus- tomer .
these letters of credit are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance , and the amount available will be reduced as certain events occur throughout the period of performance in accordance with the contract terms .
similar to the letters of credit for the f-16 contract , other letters of credit and surety bonds are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance .
at december 31 , 2005 , we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements as those arrangements are defined by the securities and exchange commission ( sec ) .
quantitative and qualitative disclosure of market risk our main exposure to market risk relates to interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates .
our financial instruments that are subject to interest rate risk principally include fixed- rate and floating rate long-term debt .
if interest rates were to change by plus or minus 1% ( 1 % ) , interest expense would increase or decrease by approximately $ 10 million related to our float- ing rate debt .
the estimated fair values of the corporation 2019s long-term debt instruments at december 31 , 2005 aggregated approximately $ 6.2 billion , compared with a carrying amount of approximately $ 5.0 billion .
the majority of our long-term debt obligations are not callable until maturity .
we have used interest rate swaps in the past to manage our exposure to fixed and variable interest rates ; however , at year-end 2005 , we had no such agreements in place .
we use forward foreign exchange contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates , and do so in ways that qualify for hedge accounting treatment .
these exchange contracts hedge the fluctuations in cash flows associated with firm commitments or specific anticipated transactions contracted in foreign currencies , or hedge the exposure to rate changes affecting foreign currency denomi- nated assets or liabilities .
related gains and losses on these contracts , to the extent they are effective hedges , are recog- nized in income at the same time the hedged transaction is recognized or when the hedged asset or liability is adjusted .
to the extent the hedges are ineffective , gains and losses on the contracts are recognized in the current period .
at december 31 , 2005 , the fair value of forward exchange con- tracts outstanding , as well as the amounts of gains and losses recorded during the year then ended , were not material .
we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trad- ing or speculative purposes .
recent accounting pronouncements in december 2004 , the fasb issued fas 123 ( r ) , share- based payments , which will impact our net earnings and earn- ings per share and change the classification of certain elements of the statement of cash flows .
fas 123 ( r ) requires stock options and other share-based payments made to employees to be accounted for as compensation expense and recorded at fair lockheed martin corporation management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations december 31 , 2005 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what portion of the future minimum operating lease payments is due in the next 12 months?

Pre-table text:
company has a contingent liability relating to proper disposition of these balances , which amounted to $ 1926.8 mil- lion at december 31 , 2007 .
as a result of holding these customers 2019 assets in escrow , the company has ongoing programs for realizing economic benefits during the year through favorable borrowing and vendor arrangements with various banks .
there were no loans outstanding as of december 31 , 2007 and these balances were invested in short term , high grade investments that minimize the risk to principal .
leases the company leases certain of its property under leases which expire at various dates .
several of these agreements include escalation clauses and provide for purchases and renewal options for periods ranging from one to five years .
future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2012 , and thereafter in the aggregate , are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
2008	83382
2009	63060
2010	35269
2011	21598
2012	14860
thereafter	30869
total	$ 249038

Post-table text:
in addition , the company has operating lease commitments relating to office equipment and computer hardware with annual lease payments of approximately $ 16.0 million per year which renew on a short-term basis .
rent expense incurred under all operating leases during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 106.4 million , $ 81.5 million and $ 61.1 million , respectively .
data processing and maintenance services agreements .
the company has agreements with various vendors , which expire between 2008 and 2017 , for portions of its computer data processing operations and related functions .
the company 2019s estimated aggregate contractual obligation remaining under these agreements was approximately $ 888.3 million as of december 31 , 2007 .
however , this amount could be more or less depending on various factors such as the inflation rate , the introduction of significant new technologies , or changes in the company 2019s data processing needs .
( 17 ) employee benefit plans stock purchase plan prior to the certegy merger ( note 6 ) , fis employees participated in the fidelity national financial , inc .
employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) .
subsequent to the certegy merger , the company instituted its own plan with the same terms as the fidelity national financial , inc .
plan .
under the terms of both plans and subsequent amendments , eligible employees may voluntarily purchase , at current market prices , shares of fnf 2019s ( prior to the certegy merger ) or fis 2019s ( post certegy merger ) common stock through payroll deductions .
pursuant to the espp , employees may contribute an amount between 3% ( 3 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of their base salary and certain commissions .
shares purchased are allocated to employees based upon their contributions .
the company contributes varying matching amounts as specified in the espp .
the company recorded an expense of $ 15.2 million , $ 13.1 million and $ 11.1 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 relating to the participation of fis employees in the espp .
fidelity national information services , inc .
and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
considering the years 2016-2017 , what is the percentual increase observed in the payment amount per share?

Pre-table text:
humana inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 15 .
stockholders 2019 equity dividends the following table provides details of dividend payments , excluding dividend equivalent rights , in 2015 , 2016 , and 2017 under our board approved quarterly cash dividend policy : payment amount per share amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
paymentdate	amountper share	totalamount ( in millions )
2015	$ 1.14	$ 170
2016	$ 1.16	$ 172
2017	$ 1.49	$ 216

Post-table text:
on november 2 , 2017 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.40 per share that was paid on january 26 , 2018 to stockholders of record on december 29 , 2017 , for an aggregate amount of $ 55 million .
declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change .
stock repurchases in september 2014 , our board of directors replaced a previous share repurchase authorization of up to $ 1 billion ( of which $ 816 million remained unused ) with an authorization for repurchases of up to $ 2 billion of our common shares exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , which expired on december 31 , 2016 .
under the share repurchase authorization , shares may have been purchased from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market , by block purchases , through plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , or in privately-negotiated transactions ( including pursuant to accelerated share repurchase agreements with investment banks ) , subject to certain regulatory restrictions on volume , pricing , and timing .
pursuant to the merger agreement , after july 2 , 2015 , we were prohibited from repurchasing any of our outstanding securities without the prior written consent of aetna , other than repurchases of shares of our common stock in connection with the exercise of outstanding stock options or the vesting or settlement of outstanding restricted stock awards .
accordingly , as announced on july 3 , 2015 , we suspended our share repurchase program .
on february 14 , 2017 , we and aetna agreed to mutually terminate the merger agreement .
we also announced that the board had approved a new authorization for share repurchases of up to $ 2.25 billion of our common stock exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , expiring on december 31 , 2017 .
on february 16 , 2017 , we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement , the february 2017 asr , with goldman , sachs & co .
llc , or goldman sachs , to repurchase $ 1.5 billion of our common stock as part of the $ 2.25 billion share repurchase program referred to above .
on february 22 , 2017 , we made a payment of $ 1.5 billion to goldman sachs from available cash on hand and received an initial delivery of 5.83 million shares of our common stock from goldman sachs based on the then current market price of humana common stock .
the payment to goldman sachs was recorded as a reduction to stockholders 2019 equity , consisting of a $ 1.2 billion increase in treasury stock , which reflected the value of the initial 5.83 million shares received upon initial settlement , and a $ 300 million decrease in capital in excess of par value , which reflected the value of stock held back by goldman sachs pending final settlement of the february 2017 asr .
upon settlement of the february 2017 asr on august 28 , 2017 , we received an additional 0.84 million shares as determined by the average daily volume weighted-average share price of our common stock during the term of the agreement of $ 224.81 , bringing the total shares received under this program to 6.67 million .
in addition , upon settlement we reclassified the $ 300 million value of stock initially held back by goldman sachs from capital in excess of par value to treasury stock .
subsequent to settlement of the february 2017 asr , we repurchased an additional 3.04 million shares in the open market , utilizing the remaining $ 750 million of the $ 2.25 billion authorization prior to expiration. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage of total purchase commitments are due in 2013?

Pre-table text:
purchase commitments the company has entered into various purchase agreements for minimum amounts of pulpwood processing and energy over periods ranging from one to twenty years at fixed prices .
total purchase commitments are as follows: .

Table:
	( in thousands )
2010	$ 6951
2011	5942
2012	3659
2013	1486
2014	1486
thereafter	25048
total	$ 44572

Post-table text:
these purchase agreements are not marked to market .
the company purchased $ 37.3 million , $ 29.4 million , and $ 14.5 million during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , under these purchase agreements .
litigation pca is a party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business .
these legal actions cover a broad variety of claims spanning our entire business .
as of the date of this filing , the company believes it is not reasonably possible that the resolution of these legal actions will , individually or in the aggregate , have a material adverse effect on its financial position , results of operations , or cash flows .
environmental liabilities the potential costs for various environmental matters are uncertain due to such factors as the unknown magnitude of possible cleanup costs , the complexity and evolving nature of governmental laws and regulations and their interpretations , and the timing , varying costs and effectiveness of alternative cleanup technologies .
from 1994 through 2009 , remediation costs at the company 2019s mills and corrugated plants totaled approximately $ 3.2 million .
as of december 31 , 2009 , the company maintained an environmental reserve of $ 9.1 million relating to on-site landfills ( see note 13 ) and surface impoundments as well as ongoing and anticipated remedial projects .
liabilities recorded for environmental contingencies are estimates of the probable costs based upon available information and assumptions .
because of these uncertainties , pca 2019s estimates may change .
as of the date of this filing , the company believes that it is not reasonably possible that future environmental expenditures and asset retirement obligations above the $ 9.1 million accrued as of december 31 , 2009 , will have a material impact on its financial condition , results of operations , or cash flows .
in connection with the sale to pca of its containerboard and corrugated products business , pactiv agreed to retain all liability for all former facilities and all sites associated with pre-closing off-site waste disposal and all environmental liabilities related to a closed landfill located near the company 2019s filer city mill .
13 .
asset retirement obligations asset retirement obligations consist primarily of landfill capping and closure and post-closure costs .
pca is legally required to perform capping and closure and post-closure care on the landfills at each of the company 2019s mills .
in accordance with asc 410 , 201c asset retirement and environmental obligations , 201d pca recognizes the fair value of these liabilities as an asset retirement obligation for each landfill and capitalizes packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2009 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
for revisions of previous estimates , what was the impact in mmboe resulting from an increase in drilling programs in u.s . resource plays and an increase in discontinued operations due to technical reevaluation and lower royalty percentages related to lower realized prices?

Pre-table text:
supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) 2017 proved reserves decreased by 647 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 49 mmboe primarily due to the acceleration of higher economic wells in the bakken into the 5-year plan resulting in an increase of 44 mmboe , with the remainder being due to revisions across the business .
2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 116 mmboe primarily due to an increase of 97 mmboe associated with the expansion of proved areas and wells to sales from unproved categories in oklahoma .
2022 purchases of reserves in place : increased by 28 mmboe from acquisitions of assets in the northern delaware basin in new mexico .
2022 production : decreased by 145 mmboe .
2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 695 mmboe including 685 mmboe associated with the sale of our canadian business and 10 mmboe associated with divestitures of certain conventional assets in oklahoma and colorado .
see item 8 .
financial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding these dispositions .
2016 proved reserves decreased by 67 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 63 mmboe primarily due to an increase of 151 mmboe associated with the acceleration of higher economic wells in the u.s .
resource plays into the 5-year plan and a decrease of 64 mmboe due to u.s .
technical revisions .
2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 60 mmboe primarily associated with the expansion of proved areas and new wells to sales from unproven categories in oklahoma .
2022 purchases of reserves in place : increased by 34 mmboe from acquisition of stack assets in oklahoma .
2022 production : decreased by 144 mmboe .
2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 84 mmboe associated with the divestitures of certain wyoming and gulf of mexico assets .
2015 proved reserves decreased by 35 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : decreased by 2 mmboe primarily resulting from an increase of 105 mmboe associated with drilling programs in u.s .
resource plays and an increase of 67 mmboe in discontinued operations due to technical reevaluation and lower royalty percentages related to lower realized prices , offset by a decrease of 173 mmboe which was largely due to reductions to our capital development program and adherence to the sec 5-year rule .
2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by140 mmboe as a result of drilling programs in our u.s .
resource plays .
2022 production : decreased by 157 mmboe .
2022 sales of reserves in place : u.s .
conventional assets sales contributed to a decrease of 18 mmboe .
changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2017 , 546 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , a decrease of 6 mmboe from december 31 , 2016 .
the following table shows changes in proved undeveloped reserves for 2017 : ( mmboe ) .

Table:
beginning of year	552
revisions of previous estimates	5
improved recovery	2014
purchases of reserves in place	15
extensions discoveries and other additions	57
dispositions	2014
transfers to proved developed	-83 ( 83 )
end of year	546

Post-table text:
revisions of prior estimates .
revisions of prior estimates increased 5 mmboe during 2017 , primarily due to a 44 mmboe increase in the bakken from an acceleration of higher economic wells into the 5-year plan , offset by a decrease of 40 mmboe in oklahoma due to the removal of less economic wells from the 5-year plan .
extensions , discoveries and other additions .
increased 57 mmboe through expansion of proved areas in oklahoma. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percent of the finished products to the total inventory

Pre-table text:
note 6 : inventories we use the last-in , first-out ( lifo ) method for the majority of our inventories located in the continental u.s .
other inventories are valued by the first-in , first-out ( fifo ) method .
fifo cost approximates current replacement cost .
inventories measured using lifo must be valued at the lower of cost or market .
inventories measured using fifo must be valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value .
inventories at december 31 consisted of the following: .

Table:
	2018	2017
finished products	$ 988.1	$ 1211.4
work in process	2628.2	2697.7
raw materials and supplies	506.5	488.8
total ( approximates replacement cost )	4122.8	4397.9
increase ( reduction ) to lifo cost	-11.0 ( 11.0 )	60.4
inventories	$ 4111.8	$ 4458.3

Post-table text:
inventories valued under the lifo method comprised $ 1.57 billion and $ 1.56 billion of total inventories at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .
note 7 : financial instruments financial instruments that potentially subject us to credit risk consist principally of trade receivables and interest- bearing investments .
wholesale distributors of life-science products account for a substantial portion of our trade receivables ; collateral is generally not required .
we seek to mitigate the risk associated with this concentration through our ongoing credit-review procedures and insurance .
a large portion of our cash is held by a few major financial institutions .
we monitor our exposures with these institutions and do not expect any of these institutions to fail to meet their obligations .
major financial institutions represent the largest component of our investments in corporate debt securities .
in accordance with documented corporate risk-management policies , we monitor the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution or corporate issuer .
we are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to risk-management instruments but do not expect any counterparties to fail to meet their obligations given their high credit ratings .
we consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents .
the cost of these investments approximates fair value .
our equity investments are accounted for using three different methods depending on the type of equity investment : 2022 investments in companies over which we have significant influence but not a controlling interest are accounted for using the equity method , with our share of earnings or losses reported in other-net , ( income ) expense .
2022 for equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values , we measure these investments at cost , less any impairment , plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or similar investment of the same issuer .
any change in recorded value is recorded in other-net , ( income ) expense .
2022 our public equity investments are measured and carried at fair value .
any change in fair value is recognized in other-net , ( income ) expense .
we review equity investments other than public equity investments for indications of impairment on a regular basis .
our derivative activities are initiated within the guidelines of documented corporate risk-management policies and are intended to offset losses and gains on the assets , liabilities , and transactions being hedged .
management reviews the correlation and effectiveness of our derivatives on a quarterly basis. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentual increase of other income due to favorable foreign exchange and reimbursements in 2011?

Pre-table text:
shutdown .
the customer , which primarily received products from the tonnage gases segment , filed for bankruptcy in may 2012 and announced the mill shutdown in august 2012 .
pension settlement loss our u.s .
supplemental pension plan provides for a lump sum benefit payment option at the time of retirement , or for corporate officers , six months after the retirement date .
pension settlements are recognized when cash payments exceed the sum of the service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost of the plan for the fiscal year .
the participant 2019s vested benefit is considered fully settled upon cash payment of the lump sum .
we recognized $ 12.4 of settlement charges in 2013 .
advisory costs during the fourth quarter of 2013 , we incurred legal and other advisory fees of $ 10.1 ( $ 6.4 after-tax , or $ .03 per share ) in connection with our response to the rapid acquisition of a large position in shares of our common stock by pershing square capital management llc and its affiliates ( pershing square ) .
these fees , which are reflected on the consolidated income statements as 201cadvisory costs , 201d include costs incurred before and after pershing square 2019s disclosure of its holdings and cover advisory services related to the adoption of the shareholders rights plan , preparation for a potential proxy solicitation campaign , and entering into an agreement with pershing square .
other income ( expense ) , net items recorded to other income ( expense ) , net arise from transactions and events not directly related to our principal income earning activities .
the detail of other income ( expense ) , net is presented in note 23 , supplemental information , to the consolidated financial statements .
2013 vs .
2012 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 70.2 increased $ 23.1 , primarily due to higher gains from the sale of a number of small assets and investments and a favorable commercial contract settlement , partially offset by lower government grants .
otherwise , no individual items were significant in comparison to the prior year .
2012 vs .
2011 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 47.1 increased $ 5.4 , primarily due to favorable foreign exchange and reimbursements from government grants for expense , partially offset by lower gains from the sale of assets .
otherwise , no individual items were significant in comparison to the prior year .
interest expense .

Table:
	2013	2012	2011
interest incurred	$ 167.6	$ 153.9	$ 138.2
less : capitalized interest	25.8	30.2	22.7
interest expense	$ 141.8	$ 123.7	$ 115.5

Post-table text:
2013 vs .
2012 interest incurred increased $ 13.7 .
the increase was driven primarily by a higher average debt balance for $ 41 , partially offset by a lower average interest rate on the debt portfolio of $ 24 .
the change in capitalized interest was driven by a decrease in project spending and a lower average interest rate .
2012 vs .
2011 interest incurred increased $ 15.7 .
the increase was driven primarily by a higher average debt balance and debt issuance costs related to the indura s.a .
acquisition , partially offset by the impact of a stronger dollar on the translation of foreign currency interest .
the change in capitalized interest was driven by an increase in project spending which qualified for capitalization .
effective tax rate the effective tax rate equals the income tax provision divided by income from continuing operations before taxes .
refer to note 22 , income taxes , to the consolidated financial statements for details on factors affecting the effective tax rate .
2013 vs .
2012 on a gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 22.8% ( 22.8 % ) and 21.9% ( 21.9 % ) in 2013 and 2012 , respectively .
the current year rate includes income tax benefits of $ 73.7 related to the business restructuring and cost reduction plans and $ 3.7 for the advisory costs .
the prior year rate includes income tax benefits of $ 105.0 related to the business restructuring and cost reduction plans , $ 58.3 related to the second quarter spanish tax ruling , and $ 3.7 related to the customer .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in 2017 what was the debt to equity based on the 2017 actual asset allocation

Pre-table text:
republic services , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) we determine the discount rate used in the measurement of our obligations based on a model that matches the timing and amount of expected benefit payments to maturities of high quality bonds priced as of the plan measurement date .
when that timing does not correspond to a published high-quality bond rate , our model uses an expected yield curve to determine an appropriate current discount rate .
the yields on the bonds are used to derive a discount rate for the liability .
the term of our obligation , based on the expected retirement dates of our workforce , is approximately seven years .
in developing our expected rate of return assumption , we have evaluated the actual historical performance and long-term return projections of the plan assets , which give consideration to the asset mix and the anticipated timing of the plan outflows .
we employ a total return investment approach whereby a mix of equity and fixed income investments are used to maximize the long-term return of plan assets for what we consider a prudent level of risk .
the intent of this strategy is to minimize plan expenses by outperforming plan liabilities over the long run .
risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of plan liabilities , plan funded status and our financial condition .
the investment portfolio contains a diversified blend of equity and fixed income investments .
furthermore , equity investments are diversified across u.s .
and non-u.s .
stocks as well as growth , value , and small and large capitalizations .
derivatives may be used to gain market exposure in an efficient and timely manner ; however , derivatives may not be used to leverage the portfolio beyond the market value of the underlying investments .
investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through annual liability measurements , periodic asset and liability studies , and quarterly investment portfolio reviews .
the following table summarizes our target asset allocation for 2017 and actual asset allocation as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 for our plan : target allocation actual allocation actual allocation .

Table:
	targetassetallocation	2017actualassetallocation	2016actualassetallocation
debt securities	72% ( 72 % )	70% ( 70 % )	72% ( 72 % )
equity securities	28	30	28
total	100% ( 100 % )	100% ( 100 % )	100% ( 100 % )

Post-table text:
for 2018 , the investment strategy for pension plan assets is to maintain a broadly diversified portfolio designed to achieve our target of an average long-term rate of return of 5.36% ( 5.36 % ) .
while we believe we can achieve a long- term average return of 5.36% ( 5.36 % ) , we cannot be certain that the portfolio will perform to our expectations .
assets are strategically allocated among debt and equity portfolios to achieve a diversification level that reduces fluctuations in investment returns .
asset allocation target ranges and strategies are reviewed periodically with the assistance of an independent external consulting firm. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage of average common equity attribution in 2016 is made up of institutional securities?

Pre-table text:
management 2019s discussion and analysis environment , for example , to incorporate changes in stress testing or enhancements to modeling techniques .
we will continue to evaluate the framework with respect to the impact of future regulatory requirements , as appropriate .
average common equity attribution1 $ in billions 2017 2016 2015 .

Table:
$ in billions	2017	2016	2015
institutional securities	$ 40.2	$ 43.2	$ 34.6
wealth management	17.2	15.3	11.2
investment management	2.4	2.8	2.2
parent company	10.0	7.6	18.9
total	$ 69.8	$ 68.9	$ 66.9

Post-table text:
1 .
average common equity is a non-gaap financial measure .
see 201cselected non-gaap financial information 201d herein .
regulatory developments resolution and recovery planning pursuant to the dodd-frank act , we are required to periodi- cally submit to the federal reserve and the fdic a resolution plan that describes our strategy for a rapid and orderly resolu- tion under the u.s .
bankruptcy code in the event of our material financial distress or failure .
our preferred resolution strategy , which is set out in our 2017 resolution plan , is an spoe strategy .
we submitted our full 2017 resolution plan on june 30 , 2017 .
as indicated in our 2017 resolution plan , the parent company has amended and restated its support agreement with its material entities , as defined in our 2017 resolution plan .
under the secured amended and restated support agreement , upon the occur- rence of a resolution scenario , the parent company would be obligated to contribute or loan on a subordinated basis all of its contributable material assets , other than shares in subsidi- aries of the parent company and certain intercompany receiv- ables , to provide capital and liquidity , as applicable , to our material entities .
the obligations of the parent company under the secured amended and restated support agreement are in most cases secured on a senior basis by the assets of the parent company ( other than shares in subsidiaries of the parent company ) .
as a result , claims of our material entities against the assets of the parent company ( other than shares in subsidiaries of the parent company ) are effectively senior to unsecured obliga- tions of the parent company .
in december 2017 , we received joint feedback on our 2017 resolution plan from the federal reserve and the fdic .
the feedback identified no deficiencies in our 2017 resolution plan but noted one shortcoming to be remediated in our next resolution plan submission .
further , the federal reserve and the fdic have extended the next resolution plan filing deadline for eight large domestic banks , including us , by one year to july 1 , 2019 .
for more information about resolution and recovery planning requirements and our activities in these areas , including the implications of such activities in a resolution scenario , see 201cbusiness 2014supervision and regulation 2014financial holding company 2014resolution and recovery planning 201d and 201crisk factors 2014legal , regulatory and compliance risk . 201d legacy covered funds under the volcker rule the volcker rule prohibits 201cbanking entities , 201d including us and our affiliates , from engaging in certain 201cproprietary trading 201d activities , as defined in the volcker rule , subject to exemptions for underwriting , market-making-related activities , risk-mitigating hedging and certain other activities .
the volcker rule also prohibits certain investments and relation- ships by banking entities with 201ccovered funds , 201d with a number of exemptions and exclusions .
in june 2017 , we received approval from the federal reserve of our application for a five-year extension of the transition period to conform invest- ments in certain legacy volcker covered funds that are also illiquid funds .
the approval covered essentially all of our non-conforming investments in , and relationships with , legacy covered funds subject to the volcker rule .
for more informa- tion about the volcker rule , see 201cbusiness 2014supervision and regulation 2014activities restrictions under the volcker rule . 201d u.s .
department of labor conflict of interest rule the u.s .
dol 2019s final conflict of interest rule under erisa went into effect on june 9 , 2017 , with certain aspects subject to phased-in compliance .
full compliance with the rule 2019s related exemptions is currently scheduled to be required by july 1 , 2019 .
in addition , the u.s .
dol is undertaking an examination of the rule that may result in changes to the rule or its related exemptions or a change in the full compliance date .
for a discussion of the u.s .
dol conflict of interest rule , see 201cbusiness 2014supervision and regulation 2014instit- utional securities and wealth management . 201d u.k .
referendum following the u.k .
electorate vote to leave the e.u. , the u.k .
invoked article 50 of the lisbon treaty on march 29 , 2017 , which triggered a two-year period , subject to extension ( which would need the unanimous approval of the e.u .
member states ) , during which the u.k .
government is expected to negotiate its withdrawal agreement with the e.u .
for further discussion of u.k .
referendum 2019s potential impact on our operations , see 201crisk factors 2014international risk . 201d for further information regarding our exposure to the u.k. , see also 201cquantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk 2014risk management 2014credit risk 2014country risk exposure . 201d 69 december 2017 form 10-k .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the return on total assets during 2014?

Pre-table text:
item 6 .
selected financial data the following table sets forth our selected financial data .
the table should be read in conjunction with item 7 and item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k. .

Table:
( $ in millions except per share amounts )	year ended december 31 2017	year ended december 31 2016	year ended december 31 2015	year ended december 31 2014	year ended december 31 2013
sales and service revenues	$ 7441	$ 7068	$ 7020	$ 6957	$ 6820
goodwill impairment	2014	2014	75	47	2014
operating income ( loss )	865	858	769	655	512
net earnings ( loss )	479	573	404	338	261
total assets	6374	6352	6024	6239	6190
long-term debt ( 1 )	1279	1278	1273	1562	1665
total long-term obligations	3225	3356	3260	3562	3277
net cash provided by ( used in ) operating activities	814	822	861	755	260
free cash flow ( 2 )	453	537	673	590	121
dividends declared per share	$ 2.52	$ 2.10	$ 1.70	$ 1.00	$ 0.50
basic earnings ( loss ) per share	$ 10.48	$ 12.24	$ 8.43	$ 6.93	$ 5.25
diluted earnings ( loss ) per share	$ 10.46	$ 12.14	$ 8.36	$ 6.86	$ 5.18

Post-table text:
( 1 ) long-term debt does not include the current portion of long-term debt , which is included in current liabilities .
( 2 ) free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure and represents cash from operating activities less capital expenditures net of related grant proceeds .
see liquidity and capital resources in item 7 for more information on this measure. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the net change in shares of common stock outstanding from 2013 to 2014 in millions?

Pre-table text:
morgan stanley notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) other regulated subsidiaries .
certain other u.s .
and non-u.s .
subsidiaries are subject to various securities , commodities and banking regulations , and capital adequacy requirements promulgated by the regulatory and exchange authorities of the countries in which they operate .
these subsidiaries have consistently operated with capital in excess of their local capital adequacy requirements .
morgan stanley derivative products inc .
( 201cmsdp 201d ) , a derivative products subsidiary rated a3 by moody 2019s and aa- by s&p , maintains certain operating restrictions that have been reviewed by moody 2019s and s&p .
msdp is operated such that creditors of the company should not expect to have any claims on the assets of msdp , unless and until the obligations to its own creditors are satisfied in full .
creditors of msdp should not expect to have any claims on the assets of the company or any of its affiliates , other than the respective assets of msdp .
the regulatory capital requirements referred to above , and certain covenants contained in various agreements governing indebtedness of the company , may restrict the company 2019s ability to withdraw capital from its subsidiaries .
at december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 , approximately $ 31.8 billion and $ 21.9 billion , respectively , of net assets of consolidated subsidiaries may be restricted as to the payment of cash dividends and advances to the parent company .
15 .
total equity morgan stanley shareholders 2019 equity .
common stock .
changes in shares of common stock outstanding for 2014 and 2013 were as follows ( share data in millions ) : .

Table:
	2014	2013
shares outstanding at beginning of period	1945	1974
treasury stock purchases ( 1 )	-46 ( 46 )	-27 ( 27 )
other ( 2 )	52	-2 ( 2 )
shares outstanding at end of period	1951	1945

Post-table text:
( 1 ) treasury stock purchases include repurchases of common stock for employee tax withholding .
( 2 ) other includes net shares issued to and forfeited from employee stock trusts and issued for rsu conversions .
treasury shares .
at december 31 , 2014 , the company had approximately $ 0.3 billion remaining under its current share repurchase program .
the share repurchase program is for capital management purposes and considers , among other things , business segment capital needs as well as equity-based compensation and benefit plan requirements .
share repurchases under the company 2019s existing authorized program will be exercised from time to time at prices the company deems appropriate subject to various factors , including the company 2019s capital position and market conditions .
the share repurchases may be effected through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions , including through rule 10b5-1 plans , and may be suspended at any time .
share repurchases by the company are subject to regulatory approval ( see 201cmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities 201d in part ii , item 5 ) .
in march 2014 , the company received no objection from the federal reserve to the company 2019s 2014 capital plan , which included a share repurchase of up to $ 1 billion of the company 2019s outstanding common stock beginning in the second quarter of 2014 through the end of the first quarter of 2015 as well as an increase in the company 2019s quarterly common stock dividend to $ 0.10 per share from $ 0.05 per share , beginning with the dividend declared on april 17 , 2014 .
the cash dividends declared on the company 2019s outstanding preferred stock .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
on february 13 , 2009 what was the market capitalization

Pre-table text:
part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2008 and 2007. .

Table:
2008	high	low
quarter ended march 31	$ 42.72	$ 32.10
quarter ended june 30	46.10	38.53
quarter ended september 30	43.43	31.89
quarter ended december 31	37.28	19.35
2007	high	low
quarter ended march 31	$ 41.31	$ 36.63
quarter ended june 30	43.84	37.64
quarter ended september 30	45.45	36.34
quarter ended december 31	46.53	40.08

Post-table text:
on february 13 , 2009 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 28.85 per share as reported on the nyse .
as of february 13 , 2009 , we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders .
dividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock .
we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business .
the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants .
the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan , and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied .
in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction .
for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the difference between the high and low aeco natural gas sales index?

Pre-table text:
crude oil , and political unrest in the middle east and elsewhere .
later in 2008 , crude oil prices dropped more rapidly than they had climbed as the u.s .
dollar rebounded and other countries entered recessions which decreased demand .
during 2008 , the average spot price per barrel for wti was $ 99.75 , up from an average of $ 72.41 in 2007 , but ended the year at $ 44.60 .
the average spot price per barrel for brent was $ 97.26 in 2008 , up from an average of $ 72.39 in 2007 , but ended the year at $ 36.55 .
the differential between wti and brent average prices widened to $ 2.49 in 2008 from $ 0.02 in 2007 .
our domestic crude oil production is on average heavier and higher in sulfur content than light sweet wti .
heavier and higher sulfur crude oil ( commonly referred to as heavy sour crude oil ) sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil .
our international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the brent crude oil benchmark .
natural gas prices on average were higher in 2008 than in 2007 .
a significant portion of our u.s .
lower 48 states natural gas production is sold at bid-week prices or first-of-month indices relative to our specific producing areas .
the average henry hub first-of-month price index was $ 2.18 per thousand cubic feet ( 201cmcf 201d ) higher in 2008 than the 2007 average .
natural gas sales in alaska are subject to term contracts .
our other major natural gas-producing regions are europe and equatorial guinea , where large portions of our natural gas sales are subject to term contracts , making realized prices in these areas less volatile .
as we sell larger quantities of natural gas from these regions , to the extent that these fixed prices are lower than prevailing prices , our reported average natural gas prices realizations may decrease .
e&p segment income during 2008 was up 57 percent from 2007 , with revenue increases tied to these increases in average commodity prices accounting for almost half of the income improvement .
liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas sales volumes were also higher in 2008 than 2007 .
oil sands mining oil sands mining segment revenues correlate with prevailing market prices for the various qualities of synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil we produce .
roughly two-thirds of the normal output mix will track movements in wti and one-third will track movements in the canadian heavy sour crude oil marker , primarily western canadian select .
output mix can be impacted by operational problems or planned unit outages at the mine or upgrader .
during 2008 , our average realized price for synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil was $ 91.90 per barrel , up from 2007 , but ended the year at $ 24.97 per barrel impacted by a heavier yield in december and a seasonal decrease in the value of our heavy output .
the operating cost structure of the oil sands mining operations is predominantly fixed , and therefore many of the costs incurred in times of full operation continue during production downtime .
per unit costs are sensitive to production rates .
key variable costs are natural gas and diesel fuel , which track commodity markets such as the canadian aeco natural gas sales index and crude prices respectively .
the table below shows benchmark prices that impact both our revenues and variable costs , listing high and low spot prices during the year. .

Table:
benchmark wti crude oil ( dollars per barrel )	high $ 145.29	date july 3	low $ 33.87	date december 19
western canadian select ( dollars per barrel ) ( a )	$ 114.95	july	$ 23.18	december
aeco natural gas sales index ( canadian dollars per gigajoule ) ( b )	$ 11.34	july 1	$ 5.42	september 19

Post-table text:
wti crude oil ( dollars per barrel ) $ 145.29 july 3 $ 33.87 december 19 western canadian select ( dollars per barrel ) ( a ) $ 114.95 july $ 23.18 december aeco natural gas sales index ( canadian dollars per gigajoule ) ( b ) $ 11.34 july 1 $ 5.42 september 19 ( a ) monthly pricing based upon average wti adjusted for differentials unique to western canada .
( b ) alberta energy company day ahead index .
our osm segment reported income of $ 258 million for 2008 , reflecting synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil sales averaging 32 mboepd .
derivative instruments intended to hedge price risk on future sales have impacted revenues in the periods presented , with net gains of $ 48 million in 2008 and net losses of $ 53 million in 2007 .
in the first quarter of 2009 , we entered into derivative instruments which effectively offset certain of our open derivative positions .
refining , marketing and transportation rm&t segment income depends largely on our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin , refinery throughputs , retail marketing gross margins for gasoline , distillates and merchandise , and the profitability of our pipeline transportation operations. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what portion of the suros acquisition price is paid in cash?

Pre-table text:
hologic , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) a new platform technology to analyze images and breast density measurement .
the projects were substantially completed as planned in fiscal 2007 .
the deferred income tax asset relates to the tax effect of acquired net operating loss carry forwards that the company believes are realizable partially offset by acquired identifiable intangible assets , and fair value adjustments to acquired inventory as such amounts are not deductible for tax purposes .
acquisition of suros surgical systems , inc .
on july 27 , 2006 , the company completed the acquisition of suros surgical systems , inc .
( 201csuros 201d ) , pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger dated april 17 , 2006 .
the results of operations for suros have been included in the company 2019s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition as part of its mammography/breast care business segment .
suros , located in indianapolis , indiana , develops , manufactures and sells minimally invasive interventional breast biopsy technology and products for biopsy , tissue removal and biopsy site marking .
the initial aggregate purchase price for suros of approximately $ 248100 ( subject to adjustment ) consisted of 4600 shares of hologic common stock valued at $ 106500 , cash paid of $ 139000 , and approximately $ 2600 for acquisition related fees and expenses .
the company determined the fair value of the shares issued in connection with the acquisition in accordance with eitf issue no .
99-12 , determination of the measurement date for the market price of acquirer securities issued in a purchase business combination .
the components and allocation of the final purchase price , consists of the following approximate amounts: .

Table:
net tangible assets acquired as of july 27 2006	$ 13100
in-process research and development	4900
developed technology and know-how	46000
customer relationship	17900
trade name	5800
deferred income taxes	-21300 ( 21300 )
goodwill	181700
final purchase price	$ 248100

Post-table text:
the acquisition also provides for a two-year earn out .
the earn-out is payable in two annual cash installments equal to the incremental revenue growth in suros 2019 business in the two years following the closing .
the company has considered the provision of eitf issue no .
95-8 , accounting for contingent consideration paid to the shareholders of and acquired enterprise in a purchase business combination , and concluded that this contingent consideration represents additional purchase price .
during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 the company paid approximately $ 19000 to former suros shareholders for the first annual earn-out period resulting in an increase to goodwill for the same amount .
the company also accrued $ 24500 for the second and final earn-out related to suros 2019 incremental revenue growth during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 , with an increase to goodwill , of which $ 24400 had been paid as of september 27 , 2008 .
in addition to the earn-out discussed above , the company decreased goodwill in the amount of $ 1300 during the year ended september 27 , 2008 and increased goodwill in the amount of $ 210 during the year ended september 29 , 2007 .
the increase in 2007 was primarily related to recording a liability of approximately $ 550 in accordance with eitf 95-3 related to the termination of certain employees who have ceased all services for the company .
approximately $ 400 of this liability was paid during the year ended september 29 , 2007 and the balance was paid during fiscal 2008 .
this increase was partially offset by a decrease to goodwill as a result of a change in the valuation of certain assets and liabilities acquired based on information received during the year ended september 29 , 2007 .
the decrease in goodwill during 2008 was related to the reduction of an income tax liability .
there have been no other material changes to purchase price allocations. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
as of december 31 , 2016 what was the percent of the total commercial lending of the total commitments to extend credit and other commitments

Pre-table text:
note 20 commitments in the normal course of business , we have various commitments outstanding , certain of which are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .
the following table presents our outstanding commitments to extend credit along with significant other commitments as of december 31 , 2016 and december 31 , 2015 , respectively .
table 98 : commitments to extend credit and other commitments in millions december 31 december 31 .

Table:
in millions	december 312016	december 312015
commitments to extend credit
total commercial lending	$ 108256	$ 101252
home equity lines of credit	17438	17268
credit card	22095	19937
other	4192	4032
total commitments to extend credit	151981	142489
net outstanding standby letters of credit ( a )	8324	8765
reinsurance agreements ( b )	1835	2010
standby bond purchase agreements ( c )	790	911
other commitments ( d )	967	966
total commitments to extend credit and other commitments	$ 163897	$ 155141

Post-table text:
commitments to extend credit , or net unfunded loan commitments , represent arrangements to lend funds or provide liquidity subject to specified contractual conditions .
these commitments generally have fixed expiration dates , may require payment of a fee , and contain termination clauses in the event the customer 2019s credit quality deteriorates .
net outstanding standby letters of credit we issue standby letters of credit and share in the risk of standby letters of credit issued by other financial institutions , in each case to support obligations of our customers to third parties , such as insurance requirements and the facilitation of transactions involving capital markets product execution .
approximately 94% ( 94 % ) and 93% ( 93 % ) of our net outstanding standby letters of credit were rated as pass as of december 31 , 2016 and december 31 , 2015 , respectively , with the remainder rated as below pass .
an internal credit rating of pass indicates the expected risk of loss is currently low , while a rating of below pass indicates a higher degree of risk .
if the customer fails to meet its financial or performance obligation to the third party under the terms of the contract or there is a need to support a remarketing program , then upon a draw by a beneficiary , subject to the terms of the letter of credit , we would be obligated to make payment to them .
the standby letters of credit outstanding on december 31 , 2016 had terms ranging from less than 1 year to 8 years .
as of december 31 , 2016 , assets of $ 1.0 billion secured certain specifically identified standby letters of credit .
in addition , a portion of the remaining standby letters of credit issued on behalf of specific customers is also secured by collateral or guarantees that secure the customers 2019 other obligations to us .
the carrying amount of the liability for our obligations related to standby letters of credit and participations in standby letters of credit was $ .2 billion at december 31 , 2016 and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .
the pnc financial services group , inc .
2013 form 10-k 161 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what were average proportional recoverable environmental capital expenditures for the years december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , in millions?

Pre-table text:
proportional free cash flow ( a non-gaap measure ) we define proportional free cash flow as cash flows from operating activities less maintenance capital expenditures ( including non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ) , adjusted for the estimated impact of noncontrolling interests .
the proportionate share of cash flows and related adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests in our subsidiaries comprise the proportional adjustment factor presented in the reconciliation below .
upon the company's adoption of the accounting guidance for service concession arrangements effective january 1 , 2015 , capital expenditures related to service concession assets that would have been classified as investing activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows are now classified as operating activities .
see note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies of this form 10-k for further information on the adoption of this guidance .
beginning in the quarter ended march 31 , 2015 , the company changed the definition of proportional free cash flow to exclude the cash flows for capital expenditures related to service concession assets that are now classified within net cash provided by operating activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows .
the proportional adjustment factor for these capital expenditures is presented in the reconciliation below .
we also exclude environmental capital expenditures that are expected to be recovered through regulatory , contractual or other mechanisms .
an example of recoverable environmental capital expenditures is ipl's investment in mats-related environmental upgrades that are recovered through a tracker .
see item 1 . 2014us sbu 2014ipl 2014environmental matters for details of these investments .
the gaap measure most comparable to proportional free cash flow is cash flows from operating activities .
we believe that proportional free cash flow better reflects the underlying business performance of the company , as it measures the cash generated by the business , after the funding of maintenance capital expenditures , that may be available for investing or repaying debt or other purposes .
factors in this determination include the impact of noncontrolling interests , where aes consolidates the results of a subsidiary that is not wholly-owned by the company .
the presentation of free cash flow has material limitations .
proportional free cash flow should not be construed as an alternative to cash from operating activities , which is determined in accordance with gaap .
proportional free cash flow does not represent our cash flow available for discretionary payments because it excludes certain payments that are required or to which we have committed , such as debt service requirements and dividend payments .
our definition of proportional free cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies .
calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions ) 2015 2014 2013 2015/2014change 2014/2013 change .

Table:
calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions )	2015	2014	2013	2015/2014 change	2014/2013 change
net cash provided by operating activities	$ 2134	$ 1791	$ 2715	$ 343	$ -924 ( 924 )
add : capital expenditures related to service concession assets ( 1 )	165	2014	2014	165	2014
adjusted operating cash flow	2299	1791	2715	508	-924 ( 924 )
less : proportional adjustment factor on operating cash activities ( 2 ) ( 3 )	-558 ( 558 )	-359 ( 359 )	-834 ( 834 )	-199 ( 199 )	475
proportional adjusted operating cash flow	1741	1432	1881	309	-449 ( 449 )
less : proportional maintenance capital expenditures net of reinsurance proceeds ( 2 )	-449 ( 449 )	-485 ( 485 )	-535 ( 535 )	36	50
less : proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ( 2 ) ( 4 )	-51 ( 51 )	-56 ( 56 )	-75 ( 75 )	5	19
proportional free cash flow	$ 1241	$ 891	$ 1271	$ 350	$ -380 ( 380 )

Post-table text:
( 1 ) service concession asset expenditures excluded from proportional free cash flow non-gaap metric .
( 2 ) the proportional adjustment factor , proportional maintenance capital expenditures ( net of reinsurance proceeds ) and proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures are calculated by multiplying the percentage owned by noncontrolling interests for each entity by its corresponding consolidated cash flow metric and are totaled to the resulting figures .
for example , parent company a owns 20% ( 20 % ) of subsidiary company b , a consolidated subsidiary .
thus , subsidiary company b has an 80% ( 80 % ) noncontrolling interest .
assuming a consolidated net cash flow from operating activities of $ 100 from subsidiary b , the proportional adjustment factor for subsidiary b would equal $ 80 ( or $ 100 x 80% ( 80 % ) ) .
the company calculates the proportional adjustment factor for each consolidated business in this manner and then sums these amounts to determine the total proportional adjustment factor used in the reconciliation .
the proportional adjustment factor may differ from the proportion of income attributable to noncontrolling interests as a result of ( a ) non-cash items which impact income but not cash and ( b ) aes' ownership interest in the subsidiary where such items occur .
( 3 ) includes proportional adjustment amount for service concession asset expenditures of $ 84 million for the year ended december 31 , 2015 .
the company adopted service concession accounting effective january 1 , 2015 .
( 4 ) excludes ipl's proportional recoverable environmental capital expenditures of $ 205 million , $ 163 million and $ 110 million for the years december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the total return is $ 100000 are invested in s&p500 on january 1st , 2015 and sold at the end of 2016?

Pre-table text:
part ii .
item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns .
as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock .
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .
fiscal year ending december 29 .
copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global .
all rights reserved .
nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc .
s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .

Table:
	12/28/2013	1/3/2015	1/2/2016	12/31/2016	12/30/2017	12/29/2018
cadence design systems inc .	$ 100.00	$ 135.18	$ 149.39	$ 181.05	$ 300.22	$ 311.13
nasdaq composite	100.00	112.60	113.64	133.19	172.11	165.84
s&p 500	100.00	110.28	109.54	129.05	157.22	150.33
s&p 500 information technology	100.00	115.49	121.08	144.85	201.10	200.52

Post-table text:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage increase total commitments to extend credit and other commitments

Pre-table text:
the pnc financial services group , inc .
2013 form 10-k 155 of such other legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial position .
however , we cannot now determine whether or not any claims asserted against us or others to whom we may have indemnification obligations , whether in the proceedings or other matters described above or otherwise , will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in any future reporting period , which will depend on , among other things , the amount of the loss resulting from the claim and the amount of income otherwise reported for the reporting period .
note 20 commitments in the normal course of business , we have various commitments outstanding , certain of which are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .
the following table presents our outstanding commitments to extend credit along with significant other commitments as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .
table 94 : commitments to extend credit and other commitments in millions december 31 december 31 .

Table:
in millions	december 31 2018	december 312017
commitments to extend credit
total commercial lending	$ 120165	$ 112125
home equity lines of credit	16944	17852
credit card	27100	24911
other	5069	4753
total commitments to extend credit	169278	159641
net outstanding standby letters of credit ( a )	8655	8651
reinsurance agreements ( b )	1549	1654
standby bond purchase agreements ( c )	1000	843
other commitments ( d )	1130	1732
total commitments to extend credit and other commitments	$ 181612	$ 172521

Post-table text:
commitments to extend credit , or net unfunded loan commitments , represent arrangements to lend funds or provide liquidity subject to specified contractual conditions .
these commitments generally have fixed expiration dates , may require payment of a fee , and generally contain termination clauses in the event the customer 2019s credit quality deteriorates .
net outstanding standby letters of credit we issue standby letters of credit and share in the risk of standby letters of credit issued by other financial institutions , in each case to support obligations of our customers to third parties , such as insurance requirements and the facilitation of transactions involving capital markets product execution .
approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of our net outstanding standby letters of credit were rated as pass at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , with the remainder rated as criticized .
an internal credit rating of pass indicates the expected risk of loss is currently low , while a rating of criticized indicates a higher degree of risk .
if the customer fails to meet its financial or performance obligation to the third party under the terms of the contract or there is a need to support a remarketing program , then upon a draw by a beneficiary , subject to the terms of the letter of credit , we would be obligated to make payment to them .
the standby letters of credit outstanding on december 31 , 2018 had terms ranging from less than one year to six years .
as of december 31 , 2018 , assets of $ 1.1 billion secured certain specifically identified standby letters of credit .
in addition , a portion of the remaining standby letters of credit issued on behalf of specific customers is also secured by collateral or guarantees that secure the customers 2019 other obligations to us .
the carrying amount of the liability for our obligations related to standby letters of credit and participations in standby letters of credit was $ .2 billion at december 31 , 2018 and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
for the quarter ended september 30 , 2013 what was the total number of shares purchased in august

Pre-table text:
additionally , in october 2013 , our board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.40 per share of class a common stock ( determined in the case of class b and c common stock , on an as-converted basis ) payable on december 3 , 2013 , to holders of record as of november 15 , 2013 of our class a , b and c common stock .
subject to legally available funds , we expect to continue paying quarterly cash dividends on our outstanding class a , b and c common stock in the future .
however , the declaration and payment of future dividends is at the sole discretion of our board of directors after taking into account various factors , including , but not limited to , our financial condition , settlement indemnifications , operating results , available cash and current and anticipated cash needs .
issuer purchases of equity securities the table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases of the company 2019s common stock made by or on behalf of the company during the quarter ended september 30 , 2013 .
period number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 2 ) approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 2 ) .

Table:
period	( a ) totalnumber ofsharespurchased ( 1 )	( b ) averageprice paidper share	( c ) totalnumber ofsharespurchasedas part ofpubliclyannouncedplans orprograms ( 2 )	( d ) approximatedollar valueof shares thatmay yet bepurchasedunder the plans orprograms ( 2 )
july 1-31 2013	745148	$ 183.69	744500	$ 1424252596
august 1-31 2013	6640563	$ 176.78	6638189	$ 250658812
september 1-30 2013	2014	$ 2014	2014	$ 250658812
total	7385711	$ 177.47	7382689

Post-table text:
( 1 ) includes 3022 shares of class a common stock withheld at an average price of $ 182.50 per share ( per the terms of grants under the visa 2007 equity incentive compensation plan ) to offset tax withholding obligations that occur upon vesting and release of restricted shares .
( 2 ) the figures in the table reflect transactions according to the trade dates .
for purposes of our consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k , the impact of these repurchases is recorded according to the settlement dates .
in october 2013 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized an additional $ 5.0 billion share repurchase program. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what portion of the purchasing price is dedicated to net tangible assets?

Pre-table text:
hologic , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) the acquisition also provided for a one-year earn out of eur 1700 ( approximately $ 2000 usd ) which was payable in cash if aeg calendar year 2006 earnings , as defined , exceeded a pre-determined amount .
aeg 2019s 2006 earnings did not exceed such pre-determined amounts and no payment was made .
the components and allocation of the purchase price , consists of the following approximate amounts: .

Table:
net tangible assets acquired as of may 2 2006	$ 24800
in-process research and development	600
developed technology and know-how	1900
customer relationship	800
trade name	400
deferred income taxes	-3000 ( 3000 )
goodwill	5800
final purchase price	$ 31300

Post-table text:
the company implemented a plan to restructure certain of aeg 2019s historical activities .
the company originally recorded a liability of approximately $ 2100 in accordance with eitf issue no .
95-3 , recognition of liabilities in connection with a purchase business combination , related to the termination of certain employees under this plan .
upon completion of the plan in fiscal 2007 the company reduced this liability by approximately $ 241 with a corresponding reduction in goodwill .
all amounts have been paid as of september 29 , 2007 .
as part of the aeg acquisition the company acquired a minority interest in the equity securities of a private german company .
the company estimated the fair value of these securities to be approximately $ 1400 in its original purchase price allocation .
during the year ended september 29 , 2007 , the company sold these securities for proceeds of approximately $ 2150 .
the difference of approximately $ 750 between the preliminary fair value estimate and proceeds upon sale was recorded as a reduction of goodwill .
the final purchase price allocations were completed within one year of the acquisition and the adjustments did not have a material impact on the company 2019s financial position or results of operations .
there have been no other material changes to the purchase price allocation .
as part of the purchase price allocation , all intangible assets that were a part of the acquisition were identified and valued .
it was determined that only customer relationship , trade name , developed technology and know how and in-process research and development had separately identifiable values .
the fair value of these intangible assets was determined through the application of the income approach .
customer relationship represents aeg 2019s high dependency on a small number of large accounts .
aeg markets its products through distributors as well as directly to its own customers .
trade name represents aeg 2019s product names that the company intends to continue to use .
developed technology and know how represents currently marketable purchased products that the company continues to sell as well as utilize to enhance and incorporate into the company 2019s existing products .
the intangible assets are expected to be amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected useful lives as the anticipated undiscounted cash flows are relatively consistent over the expected useful lives of the intangible assets .
the estimated $ 600 of purchase price allocated to in-process research and development projects related to aeg 2019s organic photoconductor coating and selenium product lines .
the deferred income tax liability relates to the tax effect of acquired identifiable intangible assets , and fair value adjustments to acquired inventory , land , building and related improvements as such amounts are not deductible for tax purposes .
the company had an existing relationship with aeg as a supplier of inventory items .
the supply agreement was entered into in prior years at arm 2019s length terms and conditions .
no minimum purchase requirements existed and the pricing was consistent with other vendor agreements. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}