[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage growth in the operating profit as reported from 2017 to 2018

Pre-table text:
divestiture of our arrow and moores businesses , and an unfavorable sales mix of international plumbing products , which , in aggregate , decreased sales by two percent .
net sales for 2016 were positively affected by increased sales volume of plumbing products , paints and other coating products and builders' hardware .
net sales for 2016 were also positively affected by favorable sales mix of cabinets and windows , and net selling price increases of north american windows and north american and international plumbing products .
net sales for 2016 were negatively affected by lower sales volume of cabinets and lower net selling prices of paints and other coating products .
our gross profit margins were 32.2 percent , 34.2 percent and 33.4 percent in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .
the 2018 gross profit margin was negatively impacted by an increase in commodity costs , the recognition of the inventory step up adjustment established as a part of the the acquisition of kichler , an increase in other expenses ( such as logistics costs and salaries ) and unfavorable sales mix .
these negative impacts were partially offset by an increase in net selling prices , the benefits associated with cost savings initiatives , and increased sales volume .
the 2017 gross profit margin was positively impacted by increased sales volume , a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs , and cost savings initiatives .
selling , general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 17.7 percent in 2018 compared with 18.6 percent in 2017 and 18.7 percent in 2016 .
the decrease in selling , general and administrative expenses , as a percentage of sales , was driven by leverage of fixed expenses , due primarily to increased sales volume , and improved cost control .
the following table reconciles reported operating profit to operating profit , as adjusted to exclude certain items , dollars in millions: .

Table:
	2018	2017	2016
operating profit as reported	$ 1211	$ 1194	$ 1087
rationalization charges	14	4	22
kichler inventory step up adjustment	40	2014	2014
operating profit as adjusted	$ 1265	$ 1198	$ 1109
operating profit margins as reported	14.5% ( 14.5 % )	15.6% ( 15.6 % )	14.8% ( 14.8 % )
operating profit margins as adjusted	15.1% ( 15.1 % )	15.7% ( 15.7 % )	15.1% ( 15.1 % )

Post-table text:
operating profit margin in 2018 was negatively affected by an increase in commodity costs , the recognition of the inventory step up adjustment established as a part of the the acquisition of kichler and an increase in other expenses ( such as logistics costs , salaries and erp costs ) .
these negative impacts were partially offset by increased net selling prices , benefits associated with cost savings initiatives and increased sales volume .
operating profit margin in 2017 was positively impacted by increased sales volume , cost savings initiatives , and a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs .
operating profit margin in 2017 was negatively impacted by an increase in strategic growth investments and certain other expenses , including stock-based compensation , health insurance costs , trade show costs and increased head count .
due to the recently-announced increase in tariffs on imported materials from china , and assuming tariffs rise to 25 percent in 2019 , we could be exposed to approximately $ 150 million of potential annual direct cost increases .
we will work to mitigate the impact of these tariffs through a combination of price increases , supplier negotiations , supply chain repositioning and other internal productivity measures .
other income ( expense ) , net other , net , for 2018 included $ 14 million of net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit cost and $ 8 million of realized foreign currency losses .
these expenses were partially offset by $ 3 million of earnings related to equity method investments and $ 1 million related to distributions from private equity funds .
other , net , for 2017 included $ 26 million related to periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs , $ 13 million net loss related to the divestitures of moores and arrow and $ 2 million related to the impairment of a private equity fund , partially offset by $ 3 million related to distributions from private equity funds and $ 1 million of earnings related to equity method investments. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the change in the percentage of sales to restaurants from 2018 to 2019?

Pre-table text:
sysco corporation a0- a0form a010-k 3 part a0i item a01 a0business we estimate that our sales by type of customer during the past three fiscal years were as follows: .

Table:
type of customer	2019	2018	2017
restaurants	62% ( 62 % )	62% ( 62 % )	61% ( 61 % )
education government	9	8	9
travel leisure retail	9	8	9
healthcare	8	9	9
other ( 1 )	12	13	12
totals	100% ( 100 % )	100% ( 100 % )	100% ( 100 % )

Post-table text:
( 1 ) other includes cafeterias that are not stand-alone restaurants , bakeries , caterers , churches , civic and fraternal organizations , vending distributors , other distributors and international exports .
none of these types of customers , as a group , exceeded 5% ( 5 % ) of total sales in any of the years for which information is presented .
sources of supply we purchase from thousands of suppliers , both domestic and international , none of which individually accounts for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of our purchases .
these suppliers consist generally of large corporations selling brand name and private label merchandise , as well as independent regional brand and private label processors and packers .
we also provide specialty and seasonal products from small to mid-sized producers to meet a growing demand for locally sourced products .
our locally sourced products , including produce , meats , cheese and other products , help differentiate our customers 2019 offerings , satisfy demands for new products , and support local communities .
purchasing is generally carried out through both centrally developed purchasing programs , domestically and internationally , and direct purchasing programs established by our various operating companies .
we administer a consolidated product procurement program designed to develop , obtain and ensure consistent quality food and non-food products .
the program covers the purchasing and marketing of branded merchandise , as well as products from a number of national brand suppliers , encompassing substantially all product lines .
some of our products are purchased internationally within global procurement centers in order to build strategic relationships with international suppliers and to optimize our supply chain network .
sysco 2019s operating companies purchase product from the suppliers participating in these consolidated programs and from other suppliers , although sysco brand products are only available to the operating companies through these consolidated programs .
we also focus on increasing profitability by lowering operating costs and by lowering aggregate inventory levels , which reduces future facility expansion needs at our broadline operating companies , while providing greater value to our suppliers and customers .
working capital practices our growth is funded through a combination of cash flow from operations , commercial paper issuances and long-term borrowings .
see the discussion in item 7 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations - liquidity and capital resources 201d regarding our liquidity , financial position and sources and uses of funds .
we extend credit terms to our customers that can vary from cash on delivery to 30 days or more based on our assessment of each customer 2019s credit worthiness .
we monitor each customer 2019s account and will suspend shipments if necessary .
a majority of our sales orders are filled within 24 hours of when customer orders are placed .
we generally maintain inventory on hand to be able to meet customer demand .
the level of inventory on hand will vary by product depending on shelf-life , supplier order fulfillment lead times and customer demand .
we also make purchases of additional volumes of certain products based on supply or pricing opportunities .
we take advantage of suppliers 2019 cash discounts where appropriate and otherwise generally receive payment terms from our suppliers ranging from weekly to 45 days or more .
corporate headquarters and shared services center our corporate staff makes available a number of services to our operating companies and our shared services center performs support services for employees , suppliers and customers .
members of these groups possess experience and expertise in , among other areas , customer and vendor contract administration , accounting and finance , treasury , legal , information technology , payroll and employee benefits , risk management and insurance , sales and marketing , merchandising , inbound logistics , human resources , strategy and tax compliance services .
the corporate office also makes available supply chain expertise , such as in warehousing and distribution services , which provide assistance in operational best practices , including space utilization , energy conservation , fleet management and work flow. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what are the annual other sinking fund requirements as a percentage of annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) and annual cash sinking fund requirements for debt outstanding in 2007?

Pre-table text:
entergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( d ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on october 1 , 2003 and will then be remarketed .
( e ) on june 1 , 2002 , entergy louisiana remarketed $ 55 million st .
charles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030 , resetting the interest rate to 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) through may 2005 .
( f ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1 , 2005 and will then be remarketed .
( g ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year .
it is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms .
the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) and annual cash sinking fund requirements for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2002 , for the next five years are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
2003	$ 1150786
2004	$ 925005
2005	$ 540372
2006	$ 139952
2007	$ 475288

Post-table text:
not included are other sinking fund requirements of approximately $ 30.2 million annually , which may be satisfied by cash or by certification of property additions at the rate of 167% ( 167 % ) of such requirements .
in december 2002 , when the damhead creek project was sold , the buyer of the project assumed all obligations under the damhead creek credit facilities and the damhead creek interest rate swap agreements .
in november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .
entergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .
these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .
in accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .
this liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .
covenants in the entergy corporation 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization .
if entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other credit facilities or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the facility's maturity may occur .
in january 2003 , entergy paid in full , at maturity , the outstanding debt relating to the top of iowa wind project .
capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : fffd maintain system energy's equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short-term debt ) ; fffd permit the continued commercial operation of grand gulf 1 ; fffd pay in full all system energy indebtedness for borrowed money when due ; and fffd enable system energy to make payments on specific system energy debt , under supplements to the agreement assigning system energy's rights in the agreement as security for the specific debt. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percent increase did inventories receive between 2002 and 2003?

Pre-table text:
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .
a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .
an impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .
federal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .
operating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .
period and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .
the unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .
respective years or of future results .
the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .
periods benefited , typically five years .
for approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .
the company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .
share .
the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .
new capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .
the pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .
( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .
each the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .
receive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .
inventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .
the net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .

Table:
	2003	2002
finished goods	$ 384.3	$ 206.7
raw materials and work in progress	90.8	50.9
inventory step-up	52.6	2013
inventories net	$ 527.7	$ 257.6

Post-table text:
made by zimmer to implex pursuant to their existing alliance raw materials and work in progress 90.8 50.9 arrangement , escrow and other items .
the acquisition will be inventory step-up 52.6 2013 accounted for under the purchase method of accounting .
inventories , net $ 527.7 $ 257.6 reserves for obsolete and slow-moving inventory at4 .
change in accounting principle december 31 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 47.4 million and instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic $ 45.5 million , respectively .
provisions charged to expense surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical were $ 11.6 million , $ 6.0 million and $ 11.9 million for the procedures .
effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .
recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , amounts written off against the reserve were $ 11.7 million , plant and equipment .
undeployed instruments are carried at $ 7.1 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .
instruments in the december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .
field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .
following the acquisition of centerpulse , the company depreciation is computed using the straight-line method established a common approach for estimating excess based on average estimated useful lives , determined inventory and instruments .
this change in estimate resulted principally in reference to associated product life cycles , in a charge to earnings of $ 3.0 million after tax in the fourth primarily five years .
in accordance with sfas no .
144 , the quarter .
company reviews instruments for impairment whenever .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
on february 112011 what was the market capitalization

Pre-table text:
part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2010 and 2009. .

Table:
2010	high	low
quarter ended march 31	$ 44.61	$ 40.10
quarter ended june 30	45.33	38.86
quarter ended september 30	52.11	43.70
quarter ended december 31	53.14	49.61
2009	high	low
quarter ended march 31	$ 32.53	$ 25.45
quarter ended june 30	34.52	27.93
quarter ended september 30	37.71	29.89
quarter ended december 31	43.84	35.03

Post-table text:
on february 11 , 2011 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 56.73 per share as reported on the nyse .
as of february 11 , 2011 , we had 397612895 outstanding shares of common stock and 463 registered holders .
dividends we have not historically paid a dividend on our common stock .
payment of dividends in the future , when , as and if authorized by our board of directors , would depend upon many factors , including our earnings and financial condition , restrictions under applicable law and our current and future loan agreements , our debt service requirements , our capital expenditure requirements and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time , including the potential determination to elect reit status .
in addition , the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan contain covenants that generally restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied .
for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the total of euro notes issued in 2014 , in millions of dollars approximately?

Pre-table text:
our debt issuances in 2014 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value ( e ) interest rate issuance maturity euro notes ( a ) 20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 ) 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) march 2014 march 2021 euro notes ( a ) 20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) march 2014 march 2026 euro notes ( b ) 20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) may 2014 may 2029 swiss franc notes ( c ) chf275 ( approximately $ 311 ) 0.750% ( 0.750 % ) may 2014 december 2019 swiss franc notes ( b ) chf250 ( approximately $ 283 ) 1.625% ( 1.625 % ) may 2014 may 2024 u.s .
dollar notes ( d ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) november 2014 november 2017 u.s .
dollar notes ( d ) $ 750 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) november 2014 november 2024 u.s .
dollar notes ( d ) $ 750 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) november 2014 november 2044 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in march 2015 .
( b ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in may 2015 .
( c ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in december 2014 .
( d ) interest on these notes is payable semiannually in arrears beginning in may 2015 .
( e ) u.s .
dollar equivalents for foreign currency notes were calculated based on exchange rates on the date of issuance .
the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .
the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2013 and 2014 .
2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below .
guarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2014 , we were contingently liable for $ 1.0 billion of guarantees of our own performance , which were primarily related to excise taxes on the shipment of our products .
there is no liability in the consolidated financial statements associated with these guarantees .
at december 31 , 2014 , our third-party guarantees were insignificant. .

Table:
type		face value ( e )	interest rate	issuance	maturity
euro notes	( a )	20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 )	1.875% ( 1.875 % )	march 2014	march 2021
euro notes	( a )	20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 )	2.875% ( 2.875 % )	march 2014	march 2026
euro notes	( b )	20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 )	2.875% ( 2.875 % )	may 2014	may 2029
swiss franc notes	( c )	chf275 ( approximately $ 311 )	0.750% ( 0.750 % )	may 2014	december 2019
swiss franc notes	( b )	chf250 ( approximately $ 283 )	1.625% ( 1.625 % )	may 2014	may 2024
u.s . dollar notes	( d )	$ 500	1.250% ( 1.250 % )	november 2014	november 2017
u.s . dollar notes	( d )	$ 750	3.250% ( 3.250 % )	november 2014	november 2024
u.s . dollar notes	( d )	$ 750	4.250% ( 4.250 % )	november 2014	november 2044

Post-table text:
our debt issuances in 2014 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value ( e ) interest rate issuance maturity euro notes ( a ) 20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 ) 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) march 2014 march 2021 euro notes ( a ) 20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) march 2014 march 2026 euro notes ( b ) 20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) may 2014 may 2029 swiss franc notes ( c ) chf275 ( approximately $ 311 ) 0.750% ( 0.750 % ) may 2014 december 2019 swiss franc notes ( b ) chf250 ( approximately $ 283 ) 1.625% ( 1.625 % ) may 2014 may 2024 u.s .
dollar notes ( d ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) november 2014 november 2017 u.s .
dollar notes ( d ) $ 750 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) november 2014 november 2024 u.s .
dollar notes ( d ) $ 750 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) november 2014 november 2044 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in march 2015 .
( b ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in may 2015 .
( c ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in december 2014 .
( d ) interest on these notes is payable semiannually in arrears beginning in may 2015 .
( e ) u.s .
dollar equivalents for foreign currency notes were calculated based on exchange rates on the date of issuance .
the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .
the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2013 and 2014 .
2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below .
guarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2014 , we were contingently liable for $ 1.0 billion of guarantees of our own performance , which were primarily related to excise taxes on the shipment of our products .
there is no liability in the consolidated financial statements associated with these guarantees .
at december 31 , 2014 , our third-party guarantees were insignificant. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percent of the increase in non-utility nuclear earnings in 2002

Pre-table text:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances .
the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 .
the refund was made in december 2001 .
2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s .
utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas .
non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively .
the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 .
following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: .

Table:
	2002	2001	2000
net mw in operation at december 31	3955	3445	2475
generation in gwh for the year	29953	22614	7171
capacity factor for the year	93% ( 93 % )	93% ( 93 % )	94% ( 94 % )

Post-table text:
2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the average currency translation adjustments from 2013 to 2015 in millions?

Pre-table text:
note 17 .
accumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: .

Table:
( losses ) earnings ( in millions )	( losses ) earnings 2015	( losses ) earnings 2014	2013
currency translation adjustments	$ -6129 ( 6129 )	$ -3929 ( 3929 )	$ -2207 ( 2207 )
pension and other benefits	-3332 ( 3332 )	-3020 ( 3020 )	-2046 ( 2046 )
derivatives accounted for as hedges	59	123	63
total accumulated other comprehensive losses	$ -9402 ( 9402 )	$ -6826 ( 6826 )	$ -4190 ( 4190 )

Post-table text:
reclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 .
the movement in currency translation adjustments for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , was also impacted by the purchase of the remaining shares of the mexican tobacco business .
in addition , $ 1 million , $ 5 million and $ 12 million of net currency translation adjustment gains were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , upon liquidation of subsidiaries .
for additional information , see note 13 .
benefit plans and note 15 .
financial instruments for disclosures related to pmi's pension and other benefits and derivative financial instruments .
note 18 .
colombian investment and cooperation agreement : on june 19 , 2009 , pmi announced that it had signed an agreement with the republic of colombia , together with the departments of colombia and the capital district of bogota , to promote investment and cooperation with respect to the colombian tobacco market and to fight counterfeit and contraband tobacco products .
the investment and cooperation agreement provides $ 200 million in funding to the colombian governments over a 20-year period to address issues of mutual interest , such as combating the illegal cigarette trade , including the threat of counterfeit tobacco products , and increasing the quality and quantity of locally grown tobacco .
as a result of the investment and cooperation agreement , pmi recorded a pre-tax charge of $ 135 million in the operating results of the latin america & canada segment during the second quarter of 2009 .
at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , pmi had $ 73 million and $ 71 million , respectively , of discounted liabilities associated with the colombian investment and cooperation agreement .
these discounted liabilities are primarily reflected in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and are expected to be paid through 2028 .
note 19 .
rbh legal settlement : on july 31 , 2008 , rothmans inc .
( "rothmans" ) announced the finalization of a cad 550 million settlement ( or approximately $ 540 million , based on the prevailing exchange rate at that time ) between itself and rothmans , benson & hedges inc .
( "rbh" ) , on the one hand , and the government of canada and all 10 provinces , on the other hand .
the settlement resolved the royal canadian mounted police's investigation relating to products exported from canada by rbh during the 1989-1996 period .
rothmans' sole holding was a 60% ( 60 % ) interest in rbh .
the remaining 40% ( 40 % ) interest in rbh was owned by pmi. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}

table_average(
currency translation adjustments
)
EOF


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the ratio of the gallons hedged in 2017 to 2018

Pre-table text:
republic services , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 16 .
financial instruments fuel hedges we have entered into multiple swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges to mitigate some of our exposure related to changes in diesel fuel prices .
these swaps qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of forecasted diesel fuel purchases ( fuel hedges ) .
the following table summarizes our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2016 : year gallons hedged weighted average contract price per gallon .

Table:
year	gallons hedged	weighted average contractprice per gallon
2017	12000000	$ 2.92
2018	3000000	2.61

Post-table text:
if the national u.s .
on-highway average price for a gallon of diesel fuel as published by the department of energy exceeds the contract price per gallon , we receive the difference between the average price and the contract price ( multiplied by the notional gallons ) from the counterparty .
if the average price is less than the contract price per gallon , we pay the difference to the counterparty .
the fair values of our fuel hedges are determined using standard option valuation models with assumptions about commodity prices based on those observed in underlying markets ( level 2 in the fair value hierarchy ) .
the aggregate fair values of our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 were current liabilities of $ 2.7 million and $ 37.8 million , respectively , and have been recorded in other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets .
the ineffective portions of the changes in fair values resulted in a gain of $ 0.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , and a loss of $ 0.4 million and $ 0.5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , and have been recorded in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income .
total gain ( loss ) recognized in other comprehensive income ( loss ) for fuel hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ 20.7 million , $ ( 2.0 ) million and $ ( 24.2 ) million , for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .
we classify cash inflows and outflows from our fuel hedges within operating activities in the unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows .
recycling commodity hedges revenue from the sale of recycled commodities is primarily from sales of old corrugated containers and old newsprint .
from time to time we use derivative instruments such as swaps and costless collars designated as cash flow hedges to manage our exposure to changes in prices of these commodities .
during 2016 , we entered into multiple agreements related to the forecasted occ sales .
the agreements qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of certain forecasted recycling commodity sales ( commodity hedges ) .
we entered into costless collar agreements on forecasted sales of occ .
the agreements involve combining a purchased put option giving us the right to sell occ at an established floor strike price with a written call option obligating us to deliver occ at an established cap strike price .
the puts and calls have the same settlement dates , are net settled in cash on such dates and have the same terms to expiration .
the contemporaneous combination of options resulted in no net premium for us and represents costless collars .
under these agreements , we will make or receive no payments as long as the settlement price is between the floor price and cap price ; however , if the settlement price is above the cap , we will pay the counterparty an amount equal to the excess of the settlement price over the cap times the monthly volumes hedged .
if the settlement price is below the floor , the counterparty will pay us the deficit of the settlement price below the floor times the monthly volumes hedged .
the objective of these agreements is to reduce variability of cash flows for forecasted sales of occ between two designated strike prices. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage of the total purchase price is represented by goodwill?

Pre-table text:
software and will give the company a comprehensive design-to-silicon flow that links directly into the semiconductor manufacturing process .
integrating hpl 2019s yield management and test chip technologies into the company 2019s industry-leading dfm portfolio is also expected to enable customers to increase their productivity and improve profitability in the design and manufacture of advanced semiconductor devices .
purchase price .
the company paid $ 11.0 million in cash for all outstanding shares of hpl .
in addition , the company had a prior investment in hpl of approximately $ 1.9 million .
the total purchase consideration consisted of: .

Table:
	( in thousands )
cash paid	$ 11001
prior investment in hpl	1872
acquisition-related costs	2831
total purchase price	$ 15704

Post-table text:
acquisition-related costs of $ 2.8 million consist primarily of legal , tax and accounting fees of $ 1.6 million , $ 0.3 million of estimated facilities closure costs and other directly related charges , and $ 0.9 million in employee termination costs .
as of october 31 , 2006 , the company had paid $ 2.2 million of the acquisition related costs , of which $ 1.1 million were for professional services costs , $ 0.2 million were for facilities closure costs and $ 0.9 million were for employee termination costs .
the $ 0.6 million balance remaining at october 31 , 2006 consists of professional and tax-related service fees and facilities closure costs .
assets acquired .
the company acquired $ 8.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 5.1 million in core developed technology , $ 3.2 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in backlog to be amortized over two to four years .
approximately $ 0.8 million of the purchase price represents the fair value of acquired in-process research and development projects that have not yet reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use .
accordingly , the amount was immediately expensed and included in the company 2019s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 .
additionally , the company acquired tangible assets of $ 14.0 million and assumed liabilities of $ 10.9 million .
goodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger was $ 3.4 million .
goodwill resulted primarily from the company 2019s expectation of synergies from the integration of hpl 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations .
other .
during the fiscal year 2006 , the company completed an asset acquisition for cash consideration of $ 1.5 million .
this acquisition is not considered material to the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet and results of operations .
fiscal 2005 acquisitions nassda corporation ( nassda ) the company acquired nassda on may 11 , 2005 .
reasons for the acquisition .
the company believes nassda 2019s full-chip circuit simulation and analysis software will broaden its offerings of transistor-level circuit simulation tools , particularly in the area of mixed-signal and memory design .
purchase price .
the company acquired all the outstanding shares of nassda for total cash consideration of $ 200.2 million , or $ 7.00 per share .
in addition , as required by the merger agreement , certain nassda officers , directors and employees who were defendants in certain preexisting litigation .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage change of our accrued trade liabilities in 2019 compared to 2018

Pre-table text:
the following table summarizes our future estimated cash payments under existing contractual obligations , including payments due by period: .

Table:
in millions	payments due by fiscal year total	payments due by fiscal year 2020	payments due by fiscal year 2021 -22	payments due by fiscal year 2023 -24	payments due by fiscal year 2025 and thereafter
long-term debt ( a )	$ 13093.0	$ 1396.3	$ 3338.4	$ 2810.2	$ 5548.1
accrued interest	92.6	92.6	-	-	-
operating leases ( b )	482.6	120.0	186.7	112.9	63.0
capital leases	0.3	0.2	0.1	-	-
purchase obligations ( c )	2961.8	2605.1	321.9	27.6	7.2
total contractual obligations	16630.3	4214.2	3847.1	2950.7	5618.3
other long-term obligations ( d )	1302.4	-	-	-	-
total long-term obligations	$ 17932.7	$ 4214.2	$ 3847.1	$ 2950.7	$ 5618.3

Post-table text:
( a ) amounts represent the expected cash payments of our long-term debt and do not include $ 0.3 million for capital leases or $ 72.0 million for net unamortized debt issuance costs , premiums and discounts , and fair value adjustments .
( b ) operating leases represents the minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases .
( c ) the majority of the purchase obligations represent commitments for raw material and packaging to be utilized in the normal course of business and for consumer marketing spending commitments that support our brands .
for purposes of this table , arrangements are considered purchase obligations if a contract specifies all significant terms , including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased , a pricing structure , and approximate timing of the transaction .
most arrangements are cancelable without a significant penalty and with short notice ( usually 30 days ) .
any amounts reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as accounts payable and accrued liabilities are excluded from the table above .
( d ) the fair value of our foreign exchange , equity , commodity , and grain derivative contracts with a payable position to the counterparty was $ 17.3 million as of may 26 , 2019 , based on fair market values as of that date .
future changes in market values will impact the amount of cash ultimately paid or received to settle those instruments in the future .
other long-term obligations mainly consist of liabilities for accrued compensation and benefits , including the underfunded status of certain of our defined benefit pension , other postretirement benefit , and postemployment benefit plans , and miscellaneous liabilities .
we expect to pay approximately $ 20 million of benefits from our unfunded postemployment benefit plans and approximately $ 18 million of deferred compensation in fiscal 2020 .
we are unable to reliably estimate the amount of these payments beyond fiscal 2020 .
as of may 26 , 2019 , our total liability for uncertain tax positions and accrued interest and penalties was $ 165.1 million .
significant accounting estimates for a complete description of our significant accounting policies , please see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .
our significant accounting estimates are those that have a meaningful impact on the reporting of our financial condition and results of operations .
these estimates include our accounting for promotional expenditures , valuation of long-lived assets , intangible assets , redeemable interest , stock-based compensation , income taxes , and defined benefit pension , other postretirement benefit , and postemployment benefit plans .
revenue recognition our revenues are reported net of variable consideration and consideration payable to our customers , including trade promotion , consumer coupon redemption and other costs , including estimated allowances for returns , unsalable product , and prompt pay discounts .
trade promotions are recorded using significant judgment of estimated participation and performance levels for offered programs at the time of sale .
differences between estimated expenses and actual costs are recognized as a change in management estimate in a subsequent period .
our accrued trade liabilities were $ 484 million as of may 26 , 2019 , and $ 500 million as of may 27 , 2018 .
because these amounts are significant , if our estimates are inaccurate we would have to make adjustments in subsequent periods that could have a significant effect on our results of operations. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the net change in ending available for sale investment securities from 2017 to 2018?

Pre-table text:
management 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding , capital , structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks .
the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities .
treasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .
treasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives .
for further information on derivatives , refer to note 5 .
in addition , treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments .
for further information on liquidity and funding risk , refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100 .
for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131 .
the investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities , u.s .
and non-u.s .
government securities , obligations of u.s .
states and municipalities , other abs and corporate debt securities .
at december 31 , 2018 , the investment securities portfolio was $ 260.1 billion , and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and , where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) .
refer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .
selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 395 ) $ ( 78 ) $ 132 available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities ( period-end ) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities ( period-end ) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance , the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018 .
for additional information , refer to notes 1 and 10. .

Table:
as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )	2018	2017	2016
investment securities gains/ ( losses )	$ -395 ( 395 )	$ -78 ( 78 )	$ 132
available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average )	203449	219345	226892
held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average )	31747	47927	51358
investment securities portfolio ( average )	235197	267272	278250
afs investment securities ( period-end )	228681	200247	236670
htm investment securities ( period-end )	31434	47733	50168
investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end )	260115	247980	286838

Post-table text:
management 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding , capital , structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks .
the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities .
treasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .
treasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives .
for further information on derivatives , refer to note 5 .
in addition , treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments .
for further information on liquidity and funding risk , refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100 .
for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131 .
the investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities , u.s .
and non-u.s .
government securities , obligations of u.s .
states and municipalities , other abs and corporate debt securities .
at december 31 , 2018 , the investment securities portfolio was $ 260.1 billion , and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and , where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) .
refer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .
selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 395 ) $ ( 78 ) $ 132 available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities ( period-end ) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities ( period-end ) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance , the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018 .
for additional information , refer to notes 1 and 10. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percent higher is the average var for foreign exchange products than that of interest rate products?

Pre-table text:
the following table presents var with respect to our trading activities , as measured by our var methodology for the periods indicated : value-at-risk .

Table:
years ended december 31 ( inmillions )	2008 annual average	2008 maximum	2008 minimum	2008 annual average	2008 maximum	minimum
foreign exchange products	$ 1.8	$ 4.7	$ .3	$ 1.8	$ 4.0	$ .7
interest-rate products	1.1	2.4	.6	1.4	3.7	.1

Post-table text:
we back-test the estimated one-day var on a daily basis .
this information is reviewed and used to confirm that all relevant trading positions are properly modeled .
for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , we did not experience any actual trading losses in excess of our end-of-day var estimate .
asset and liability management activities the primary objective of asset and liability management is to provide sustainable and growing net interest revenue , or nir , under varying economic environments , while protecting the economic values of our balance sheet assets and liabilities from the adverse effects of changes in interest rates .
most of our nir is earned from the investment of deposits generated by our core investment servicing and investment management businesses .
we structure our balance sheet assets to generally conform to the characteristics of our balance sheet liabilities , but we manage our overall interest-rate risk position in the context of current and anticipated market conditions and within internally-approved risk guidelines .
our overall interest-rate risk position is maintained within a series of policies approved by the board and guidelines established and monitored by alco .
our global treasury group has responsibility for managing state street 2019s day-to-day interest-rate risk .
to effectively manage the consolidated balance sheet and related nir , global treasury has the authority to take a limited amount of interest-rate risk based on market conditions and its views about the direction of global interest rates over both short-term and long-term time horizons .
global treasury manages our exposure to changes in interest rates on a consolidated basis organized into three regional treasury units , north america , europe and asia/pacific , to reflect the growing , global nature of our exposures and to capture the impact of change in regional market environments on our total risk position .
our investment activities and our use of derivative financial instruments are the primary tools used in managing interest-rate risk .
we invest in financial instruments with currency , repricing , and maturity characteristics we consider appropriate to manage our overall interest-rate risk position .
in addition to on-balance sheet assets , we use certain derivatives , primarily interest-rate swaps , to alter the interest-rate characteristics of specific balance sheet assets or liabilities .
the use of derivatives is subject to alco-approved guidelines .
additional information about our use of derivatives is in note 17 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k under item 8 .
as a result of growth in our non-u.s .
operations , non-u.s .
dollar denominated customer liabilities are a significant portion of our consolidated balance sheet .
this growth results in exposure to changes in the shape and level of non-u.s .
dollar yield curves , which we include in our consolidated interest-rate risk management process .
because no one individual measure can accurately assess all of our exposures to changes in interest rates , we use several quantitative measures in our assessment of current and potential future exposures to changes in interest rates and their impact on net interest revenue and balance sheet values .
net interest revenue simulation is the primary tool used in our evaluation of the potential range of possible net interest revenue results that could occur under a variety of interest-rate environments .
we also use market valuation and duration analysis to assess changes in the economic value of balance sheet assets and liabilities caused by assumed changes in interest rates .
finally , gap analysis 2014the difference between the amount of balance sheet assets and liabilities re-pricing within a specified time period 2014is used as a measurement of our interest-rate risk position. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the change in millions of total redeemable stock of subsidiaries from 2015 to 2016?

Pre-table text:
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following table summarizes the company's redeemable stock of subsidiaries balances as of the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

Table:
december 31,	2016	2015
ipalco common stock	$ 618	$ 460
colon quotas ( 1 )	100	2014
ipl preferred stock	60	60
other common stock	4	2014
dpl preferred stock	2014	18
total redeemable stock of subsidiaries	$ 782	$ 538

Post-table text:
_____________________________ ( 1 ) characteristics of quotas are similar to common stock .
colon 2014 during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , our partner in colon increased their ownership from 25% ( 25 % ) to 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) and made capital contributions of $ 106 million .
any subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to our partner , or measure the investment at fair value , will be classified as temporary equity each reporting period as it is probable that the shares will become redeemable .
ipl 2014 ipl had $ 60 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , which represented five series of preferred stock .
the total annual dividend requirements were approximately $ 3 million at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 .
certain series of the preferred stock were redeemable solely at the option of the issuer at prices between $ 100 and $ 118 per share .
holders of the preferred stock are entitled to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors if ipl has not paid dividends to its preferred stockholders for four consecutive quarters .
based on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares is considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock is considered temporary equity .
dpl 2014 dpl had $ 18 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , which represented three series of preferred stock issued by dp&l , a wholly-owned subsidiary of dpl .
the dp&l preferred stock was redeemable at dp&l's option as determined by its board of directors at per-share redemption prices between $ 101 and $ 103 per share , plus cumulative preferred dividends .
in addition , dp&l's amended articles of incorporation contained provisions that permitted preferred stockholders to elect members of the dp&l board of directors in the event that cumulative dividends on the preferred stock are in arrears in an aggregate amount equivalent to at least four full quarterly dividends .
based on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect members of dp&l's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares was considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock was considered temporary equity .
in september 2016 , it became probable that the preferred shares would become redeemable .
as such , the company recorded an adjustment of $ 5 million to retained earnings to adjust the preferred shares to their redemption value of $ 23 million .
in october 2016 , dp&l redeemed all of its preferred shares .
upon redemption , the preferred shares were no longer outstanding and all rights of the holders thereof as shareholders of dp&l ceased to exist .
ipalco 2014 in february 2015 , cdpq purchased 15% ( 15 % ) of aes us investment , inc. , a wholly-owned subsidiary that owns 100% ( 100 % ) of ipalco , for $ 247 million , with an option to invest an additional $ 349 million in ipalco through 2016 in exchange for a 17.65% ( 17.65 % ) equity stake .
in april 2015 , cdpq invested an additional $ 214 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 24.90% ( 24.90 % ) .
as a result of these transactions , $ 84 million in taxes and transaction costs were recognized as a net decrease to equity .
the company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of 377 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .
no gain or loss was recognized in net income as the transaction was not considered to be a sale of in-substance real estate .
in march 2016 , cdpq exercised its remaining option by investing $ 134 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 30% ( 30 % ) .
the company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of $ 84 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .
in june 2016 , cdpq contributed an additional $ 24 million to ipalco , with no impact to the ownership structure of the investment .
any subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to cdpq will be classified as nci within permanent equity as it is not probable that the shares will become redeemable. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the roi of nasdaq composite from 2008 to 2009?

Pre-table text:
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .
nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .
all rights reserved. .

Table:
	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

Post-table text:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage of warehouse locations are in north america?

Pre-table text:
item 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s principal properties at october 26 , 2014 is set forth below : location type principal use square footage ownership santa clara , ca .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
office , plant & warehouse headquarters ; marketing ; manufacturing ; distribution ; research , development , engineering ; customer support 1358000 164000 leased austin , tx .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
office , plant & warehouse manufacturing 1676000 145000 leased rehovot , israel .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
office , plant & warehouse manufacturing ; research , development , engineering ; customer support 381000 leased singapore .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
office , plant & warehouse manufacturing and customer support 408000 11000 leased gloucester , ma .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
office , plant & warehouse manufacturing ; research , development , engineering ; customer support 315000 125000 leased tainan , taiwan .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
office , plant & warehouse manufacturing and customer support 320000 owned because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country .
products in the silicon systems group are manufactured in austin , texas ; singapore ; gloucester , massachusetts ; and rehovot , israel .
remanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas .
products in the display segment are manufactured in tainan , taiwan and santa clara , california .
products in the energy and environmental solutions segment are primarily manufactured in alzenau , germany ; treviso , italy ; and cheseaux , switzerland .
in addition to the above properties , applied also owns and leases offices , plants and/or warehouse locations in 75 locations throughout the world : 16 in europe , 20 in japan , 16 in north america ( principally the united states ) , 7 in china , 3 in india , 7 in korea , 3 in southeast asia , and 3 in taiwan .
these facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and/or customer support .
applied also owns a total of approximately 150 acres of buildable land in texas , california , massachusetts , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space .
applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements .
applied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .

Table:
location	type	principal use	squarefootage	ownership
santa clara ca	office plant & warehouse	headquarters ; marketing ; manufacturing ; distribution ; research developmentengineering ; customer support	1358000164000	ownedleased
austin tx	office plant & warehouse	manufacturing	1676000145000	ownedleased
rehovot israel	office plant & warehouse	manufacturing ; researchdevelopment engineering;customer support	3810005400	ownedleased
singapore	office plant & warehouse	manufacturing andcustomer support	40800011000	ownedleased
gloucester ma	office plant & warehouse	manufacturing ; researchdevelopment engineering;customer support	315000125000	ownedleased
tainan taiwan	office plant & warehouse	manufacturing andcustomer support	320000	owned

Post-table text:
item 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s principal properties at october 26 , 2014 is set forth below : location type principal use square footage ownership santa clara , ca .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
office , plant & warehouse headquarters ; marketing ; manufacturing ; distribution ; research , development , engineering ; customer support 1358000 164000 leased austin , tx .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
office , plant & warehouse manufacturing 1676000 145000 leased rehovot , israel .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
office , plant & warehouse manufacturing ; research , development , engineering ; customer support 381000 leased singapore .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
office , plant & warehouse manufacturing and customer support 408000 11000 leased gloucester , ma .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
office , plant & warehouse manufacturing ; research , development , engineering ; customer support 315000 125000 leased tainan , taiwan .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
office , plant & warehouse manufacturing and customer support 320000 owned because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country .
products in the silicon systems group are manufactured in austin , texas ; singapore ; gloucester , massachusetts ; and rehovot , israel .
remanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas .
products in the display segment are manufactured in tainan , taiwan and santa clara , california .
products in the energy and environmental solutions segment are primarily manufactured in alzenau , germany ; treviso , italy ; and cheseaux , switzerland .
in addition to the above properties , applied also owns and leases offices , plants and/or warehouse locations in 75 locations throughout the world : 16 in europe , 20 in japan , 16 in north america ( principally the united states ) , 7 in china , 3 in india , 7 in korea , 3 in southeast asia , and 3 in taiwan .
these facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and/or customer support .
applied also owns a total of approximately 150 acres of buildable land in texas , california , massachusetts , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space .
applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements .
applied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
at december 31 , 2006 what was the ratio of the expected future pension benefits after 2012 compared to 2008

Pre-table text:
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 .
in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments .
the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits .

Table:
( in millions )	pensionbenefits	otherbenefits
2007	$ 1440	$ 260
2008	1490	260
2009	1540	270
2010	1600	270
2011	1660	270
years 2012 2013 2016	9530	1260

Post-table text:
as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits .
the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million .
the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 .
we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans .
the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .
note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .
future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) .
certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s .
government under short-term or cancelable arrangements .
note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment .
we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole .
we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty .
these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio .
the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology .
we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation .
on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california .
we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program .
the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s .
air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 .
on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim .
our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals .
on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel .
natural resources defense council , et al v .
lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel .
john d .
tillson v .
lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al .
the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what are the cost reduction initiatives as a percentage of the operating companies income increase?

Pre-table text:
middleton's reported cigars shipment volume for 2012 decreased 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) due primarily to changes in trade inventories , partially offset by volume growth as a result of retail share gains .
in the cigarette category , marlboro's 2012 retail share performance continued to benefit from the brand-building initiatives supporting marlboro's new architecture .
marlboro's retail share for 2012 increased 0.6 share points versus 2011 to 42.6% ( 42.6 % ) .
in january 2013 , pm usa expanded distribution of marlboro southern cut nationally .
marlboro southern cut is part of the marlboro gold family .
pm usa's 2012 retail share increased 0.8 share points versus 2011 , reflecting retail share gains by marlboro and by l&m in discount .
these gains were partially offset by share losses on other portfolio brands .
in the machine-made large cigars category , black & mild's retail share for 2012 increased 0.5 share points .
the brand benefited from new untipped cigarillo varieties that were introduced in 2011 , black & mild seasonal offerings and the 2012 third-quarter introduction of black & mild jazz untipped cigarillos into select geographies .
in december 2012 , middleton announced plans to launch nationally black & mild jazz cigars in both plastic tip and wood tip in the first quarter of 2013 .
the following discussion compares smokeable products segment results for the year ended december 31 , 2011 with the year ended december 31 , 2010 .
net revenues , which include excise taxes billed to customers , decreased $ 221 million ( 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) ) due to lower shipment volume ( $ 1051 million ) , partially offset by higher net pricing ( $ 830 million ) , which includes higher promotional investments .
operating companies income increased $ 119 million ( 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) ) , due primarily to higher net pricing ( $ 831 million ) , which includes higher promotional investments , marketing , administration , and research savings reflecting cost reduction initiatives ( $ 198 million ) and 2010 implementation costs related to the closure of the cabarrus , north carolina manufacturing facility ( $ 75 million ) , partially offset by lower volume ( $ 527 million ) , higher asset impairment and exit costs due primarily to the 2011 cost reduction program ( $ 158 million ) , higher per unit settlement charges ( $ 120 million ) , higher charges related to tobacco and health judgments ( $ 87 million ) and higher fda user fees ( $ 73 million ) .
for 2011 , total smokeable products shipment volume decreased 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) versus 2010 .
pm usa's reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume declined 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) versus 2010 due primarily to retail share losses and one less shipping day , partially offset by changes in trade inventories .
after adjusting for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day , pm usa's 2011 domestic cigarette shipment volume was estimated to be down approximately 4% ( 4 % ) versus 2010 .
pm usa believes that total cigarette category volume for 2011 decreased approximately 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) versus 2010 , when adjusted primarily for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day .
pm usa's total premium brands ( marlboro and other premium brands ) shipment volume decreased 4.3% ( 4.3 % ) .
marlboro's shipment volume decreased 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) versus 2010 .
in the discount brands , pm usa's shipment volume decreased 0.9% ( 0.9 % ) .
pm usa's shipments of premium cigarettes accounted for 93.7% ( 93.7 % ) of its reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume for 2011 , down from 93.9% ( 93.9 % ) in 2010 .
middleton's 2011 reported cigars shipment volume was unchanged versus 2010 .
for 2011 , pm usa's retail share of the cigarette category declined 0.8 share points to 49.0% ( 49.0 % ) due primarily to retail share losses on marlboro .
marlboro's 2011 retail share decreased 0.6 share points .
in 2010 , marlboro delivered record full-year retail share results that were achieved at lower margin levels .
middleton retained a leading share of the tipped cigarillo segment of the machine-made large cigars category , with a retail share of approximately 84% ( 84 % ) in 2011 .
for 2011 , middleton's retail share of the cigar category increased 0.3 share points to 29.7% ( 29.7 % ) versus 2010 .
black & mild's 2011 retail share increased 0.5 share points , as the brand benefited from new product introductions .
during the fourth quarter of 2011 , middleton broadened its untipped cigarillo portfolio with new aroma wrap 2122 foil pouch packaging that accompanied the national introduction of black & mild wine .
this new fourth- quarter packaging roll-out also included black & mild sweets and classic varieties .
during the second quarter of 2011 , middleton entered into a contract manufacturing arrangement to source the production of a portion of its cigars overseas .
middleton entered into this arrangement to access additional production capacity in an uncertain competitive environment and an excise tax environment that potentially benefits imported large cigars over those manufactured domestically .
smokeless products segment the smokeless products segment's operating companies income grew during 2012 driven by higher pricing , copenhagen and skoal's combined volume and retail share performance and effective cost management .
the following table summarizes smokeless products segment shipment volume performance : shipment volume for the years ended december 31 .

Table:
( cans and packs in millions )	shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012	shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2011	shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2010
copenhagen	392.5	354.2	327.5
skoal	288.4	286.8	274.4
copenhagenandskoal	680.9	641.0	601.9
other	82.4	93.6	122.5
total smokeless products	763.3	734.6	724.4

Post-table text:
volume includes cans and packs sold , as well as promotional units , but excludes international volume , which is not material to the smokeless products segment .
other includes certain usstc and pm usa smokeless products .
new types of smokeless products , as well as new packaging configurations .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was change in millions for the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads on derivatives ( including hedges ) between 2017 and 2016?

Pre-table text:
the goldman sachs group , inc .
and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis sensitivity measures certain portfolios and individual positions are not included in var because var is not the most appropriate risk measure .
other sensitivity measures we use to analyze market risk are described below .
10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity measures .
the table below presents market risk for positions , accounted for at fair value , that are not included in var by asset category. .

Table:
$ in millions	as of december 2017	as of december 2016	as of december 2015
equity	$ 2096	$ 2085	$ 2157
debt	1606	1702	1479
total	$ 3702	$ 3787	$ 3636

Post-table text:
in the table above : 2030 the market risk of these positions is determined by estimating the potential reduction in net revenues of a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in the value of these positions .
2030 equity positions relate to private and restricted public equity securities , including interests in funds that invest in corporate equities and real estate and interests in hedge funds .
2030 debt positions include interests in funds that invest in corporate mezzanine and senior debt instruments , loans backed by commercial and residential real estate , corporate bank loans and other corporate debt , including acquired portfolios of distressed loans .
2030 equity and debt funded positions are included in our consolidated statements of financial condition in financial instruments owned .
see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about cash instruments .
2030 these measures do not reflect the diversification effect across asset categories or across other market risk measures .
credit spread sensitivity on derivatives and financial liabilities .
var excludes the impact of changes in counterparty and our own credit spreads on derivatives , as well as changes in our own credit spreads ( debt valuation adjustment ) on financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected .
the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads ( counterparty and our own ) on derivatives was a gain of $ 3 million and $ 2 million ( including hedges ) as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively .
in addition , the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in our own credit spreads on financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected was a gain of $ 35 million and $ 25 million as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively .
however , the actual net impact of a change in our own credit spreads is also affected by the liquidity , duration and convexity ( as the sensitivity is not linear to changes in yields ) of those financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected , as well as the relative performance of any hedges undertaken .
interest rate sensitivity .
loans receivable as of december 2017 and december 2016 were $ 65.93 billion and $ 49.67 billion , respectively , substantially all of which had floating interest rates .
as of december 2017 and december 2016 , the estimated sensitivity to a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on such loans was $ 527 million and $ 405 million , respectively , of additional interest income over a twelve-month period , which does not take into account the potential impact of an increase in costs to fund such loans .
see note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about loans receivable .
other market risk considerations as of december 2017 and december 2016 , we had commitments and held loans for which we have obtained credit loss protection from sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc .
see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about such lending commitments .
in addition , we make investments in securities that are accounted for as available-for-sale and included in financial instruments owned in the consolidated statements of financial condition .
see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information .
we also make investments accounted for under the equity method and we also make direct investments in real estate , both of which are included in other assets .
direct investments in real estate are accounted for at cost less accumulated depreciation .
see note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about other assets .
goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 93 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage of the total cash purchase price net of cash acquired was represented by ipr&d?

Pre-table text:
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 .
acquisitions ( continued ) was recorded to goodwill .
the following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed ( in millions ) : .

Table:
current assets	$ 28.1
property and equipment net	0.2
goodwill	258.9
ipr&d	190.0
current liabilities assumed	-32.9 ( 32.9 )
deferred income taxes	-66.0 ( 66.0 )
contingent consideration	-30.3 ( 30.3 )
total cash purchase price	348.0
less : cash acquired	-27.9 ( 27.9 )
total cash purchase price net of cash acquired	$ 320.1

Post-table text:
goodwill includes expected synergies and other benefits the company believes will result from the acquisition .
goodwill was assigned to the company 2019s united states segment and is not deductible for tax purposes .
ipr&d has been capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and will be assessed for impairment in subsequent periods .
the fair value of the ipr&d was determined using the income approach .
this approach determines fair value based on cash flow projections which are discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate of return .
the discount rate used to determine the fair value of the ipr&d was 16.5% ( 16.5 % ) .
completion of successful design developments , bench testing , pre-clinical studies and human clinical studies are required prior to selling any product .
the risks and uncertainties associated with completing development within a reasonable period of time include those related to the design , development , and manufacturability of the product , the success of pre-clinical and clinical studies , and the timing of regulatory approvals .
the valuation assumed $ 97.7 million of additional research and development expenditures would be incurred prior to the date of product introduction , and the company does not currently anticipate significant changes to forecasted research and development expenditures associated with the cardiaq program .
the company 2019s valuation model also assumed net cash inflows would commence in late 2018 , if successful clinical trial experiences lead to a ce mark approval .
upon completion of development , the underlying research and development intangible asset will be amortized over its estimated useful life .
the company disclosed in early february 2017 that it had voluntarily paused enrollment in its clinical trials for the edwards-cardiaq valve to perform further design validation testing on a feature of the valve .
this testing has been completed and , in collaboration with clinical investigators , the company has decided to resume screening patients for enrollment in its clinical trials .
the results of operations for cardiaq have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition .
pro forma results have not been presented as the results of cardiaq are not material in relation to the consolidated financial statements of the company .
8 .
goodwill and other intangible assets on july 3 , 2015 , the company acquired cardiaq ( see note 7 ) .
this transaction resulted in an increase to goodwill of $ 258.9 million and ipr&d of $ 190.0 million. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}