[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in these equity investment balances , what is the percent of unfunded commitments at december 31 , 2012?

Pre-table text:
market risk management 2013 equity and other investment risk equity investment risk is the risk of potential losses associated with investing in both private and public equity markets .
pnc invests primarily in private equity markets .
in addition to extending credit , taking deposits , and underwriting and trading financial instruments , we make and manage direct investments in a variety of transactions , including management buyouts , recapitalizations , and growth financings in a variety of industries .
we also have investments in affiliated and non- affiliated funds that make similar investments in private equity and in debt and equity-oriented hedge funds .
the economic and/or book value of these investments and other assets such as loan servicing rights are directly affected by changes in market factors .
the primary risk measurement for equity and other investments is economic capital .
economic capital is a common measure of risk for credit , market and operational risk .
it is an estimate of the potential value depreciation over a one year horizon commensurate with solvency expectations of an institution rated single-a by the credit rating agencies .
given the illiquid nature of many of these types of investments , it can be a challenge to determine their fair values .
see note 9 fair value in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information .
various pnc business units manage our equity and other investment activities .
our businesses are responsible for making investment decisions within the approved policy limits and associated guidelines .
a summary of our equity investments follows : table 55 : equity investments summary in millions december 31 december 31 .

Table:
in millions	december 312013	december 312012
blackrock	$ 5940	$ 5614
tax credit investments	2676	2965
private equity	1656	1802
visa	158	251
other	234	245
total	$ 10664	$ 10877

Post-table text:
blackrock pnc owned approximately 36 million common stock equivalent shares of blackrock equity at december 31 , 2013 , accounted for under the equity method .
the primary risk measurement , similar to other equity investments , is economic capital .
the business segments review section of this item 7 includes additional information about blackrock .
tax credit investments included in our equity investments are tax credit investments which are accounted for under the equity method .
these investments , as well as equity investments held by consolidated partnerships , totaled $ 2.7 billion at december 31 , 2013 and $ 3.0 billion at december 31 , 2012 .
these equity investment balances include unfunded commitments totaling $ 802 million and $ 685 million at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 , respectively .
these unfunded commitments are included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .
note 3 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report has further information on tax credit investments .
see also the critical accounting estimates and judgments section of this item 7 regarding asu 2014-01 and our intention to early adopt this guidance in the first quarter of 2014 .
private equity the private equity portfolio is an illiquid portfolio comprised of mezzanine and equity investments that vary by industry , stage and type of investment .
private equity investments carried at estimated fair value totaled $ 1.7 billion at december 31 , 2013 and $ 1.8 billion at december 31 , 2012 .
as of december 31 , 2013 , $ 1.1 billion was invested directly in a variety of companies and $ .6 billion was invested indirectly through various private equity funds .
included in direct investments are investment activities of two private equity funds that are consolidated for financial reporting purposes .
the noncontrolling interests of these funds totaled $ 236 million as of december 31 , 2013 .
the interests held in indirect private equity funds are not redeemable , but pnc may receive distributions over the life of the partnership from liquidation of the underlying investments .
see item 1 business 2013 supervision and regulation and item 1a risk factors of this report for discussion of the potential impacts of the volcker rule provisions of dodd-frank on our interests in and sponsorship of private funds covered by the volcker our unfunded commitments related to private equity totaled $ 164 million at december 31 , 2013 compared with $ 182 million at december 31 , 2012 .
during 2013 , we sold 4 million of visa class b common shares , in addition to the 9 million shares sold in 2012 , and entered into swap agreements with the purchaser of the shares .
see note 9 fair value and note 17 financial derivatives in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information .
at december 31 , 2013 , our investment in visa class b common shares totaled approximately 10 million shares and was recorded at $ 158 million .
based on the december 31 , 2013 closing price of $ 222.68 for the visa class a common shares , the fair value of our total investment was approximately $ 971 million at the 94 the pnc financial services group , inc .
2013 form 10-k .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the change in millions of weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2016 to 2017?

Pre-table text:
of prior service cost or credits , and net actuarial gains or losses ) as part of non-operating income .
we adopted the requirements of asu no .
2017-07 on january 1 , 2018 using the retrospective transition method .
we expect the adoption of asu no .
2017-07 to result in an increase to consolidated operating profit of $ 471 million and $ 846 million for 2016 and 2017 , respectively , and a corresponding decrease in non-operating income for each year .
we do not expect any impact to our business segment operating profit , our consolidated net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting asu no .
2017-07 .
intangibles-goodwill and other in january 2017 , the fasb issued asu no .
2017-04 , intangibles-goodwill and other ( topic 350 ) , which eliminates the requirement to compare the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill ( commonly referred to as step 2 ) from the goodwill impairment test .
the new standard does not change how a goodwill impairment is identified .
wewill continue to perform our quantitative and qualitative goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount , but if we are required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , under the new standard the amount of the charge will be calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s fair value from its carrying amount .
under the prior standard , if we were required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , step 2 required us to calculate the implied value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the amount of the charge was calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s implied fair value of goodwill from its actual goodwill balance .
the new standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2019 , with early adoption permitted , and should be applied prospectively from the date of adoption .
we elected to adopt the new standard for future goodwill impairment tests at the beginning of the third quarter of 2017 , because it significantly simplifies the evaluation of goodwill for impairment .
the impact of the new standard will depend on the outcomes of future goodwill impairment tests .
derivatives and hedging inaugust 2017 , the fasb issuedasu no .
2017-12derivatives and hedging ( topic 815 ) , which eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness .
the guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2018 , with early adoption permitted .
we do not expect a significant impact to our consolidated assets and liabilities , net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting this new standard .
we plan to adopt the new standard january 1 , 2019 .
leases in february 2016 , the fasb issuedasu no .
2016-02 , leases ( topic 842 ) , which requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements for both lessees and lessors .
the new standard is effective january 1 , 2019 for public companies , with early adoption permitted .
the new standard currently requires the application of a modified retrospective approach to the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements .
we are continuing to evaluate the expected impact to our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures .
we plan to adopt the new standard effective january 1 , 2019 .
note 2 2013 earnings per share theweighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common sharewere as follows ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2017	2016	2015
weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations	287.8	299.3	310.3
weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards	2.8	3.8	4.4
weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations	290.6	303.1	314.7

Post-table text:
we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respectiveweighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .
our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method .
there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .
note 3 2013 acquisitions and divestitures acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation on november 6 , 2015 , we completed the acquisition of sikorsky from united technologies corporation ( utc ) and certain of utc 2019s subsidiaries .
the purchase price of the acquisition was $ 9.0 billion , net of cash acquired .
as a result of the acquisition .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage change in inventories between 2017 and 2018?

Pre-table text:
note 6 : inventories we use the last-in , first-out ( lifo ) method for the majority of our inventories located in the continental u.s .
other inventories are valued by the first-in , first-out ( fifo ) method .
fifo cost approximates current replacement cost .
inventories measured using lifo must be valued at the lower of cost or market .
inventories measured using fifo must be valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value .
inventories at december 31 consisted of the following: .

Table:
	2018	2017
finished products	$ 988.1	$ 1211.4
work in process	2628.2	2697.7
raw materials and supplies	506.5	488.8
total ( approximates replacement cost )	4122.8	4397.9
increase ( reduction ) to lifo cost	-11.0 ( 11.0 )	60.4
inventories	$ 4111.8	$ 4458.3

Post-table text:
inventories valued under the lifo method comprised $ 1.57 billion and $ 1.56 billion of total inventories at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .
note 7 : financial instruments financial instruments that potentially subject us to credit risk consist principally of trade receivables and interest- bearing investments .
wholesale distributors of life-science products account for a substantial portion of our trade receivables ; collateral is generally not required .
we seek to mitigate the risk associated with this concentration through our ongoing credit-review procedures and insurance .
a large portion of our cash is held by a few major financial institutions .
we monitor our exposures with these institutions and do not expect any of these institutions to fail to meet their obligations .
major financial institutions represent the largest component of our investments in corporate debt securities .
in accordance with documented corporate risk-management policies , we monitor the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution or corporate issuer .
we are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to risk-management instruments but do not expect any counterparties to fail to meet their obligations given their high credit ratings .
we consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents .
the cost of these investments approximates fair value .
our equity investments are accounted for using three different methods depending on the type of equity investment : 2022 investments in companies over which we have significant influence but not a controlling interest are accounted for using the equity method , with our share of earnings or losses reported in other-net , ( income ) expense .
2022 for equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values , we measure these investments at cost , less any impairment , plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or similar investment of the same issuer .
any change in recorded value is recorded in other-net , ( income ) expense .
2022 our public equity investments are measured and carried at fair value .
any change in fair value is recognized in other-net , ( income ) expense .
we review equity investments other than public equity investments for indications of impairment on a regular basis .
our derivative activities are initiated within the guidelines of documented corporate risk-management policies and are intended to offset losses and gains on the assets , liabilities , and transactions being hedged .
management reviews the correlation and effectiveness of our derivatives on a quarterly basis. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the estimated price of hologic common stock used in the acquisition of suros?

Pre-table text:
hologic , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) a new platform technology to analyze images and breast density measurement .
the projects were substantially completed as planned in fiscal 2007 .
the deferred income tax asset relates to the tax effect of acquired net operating loss carry forwards that the company believes are realizable partially offset by acquired identifiable intangible assets , and fair value adjustments to acquired inventory as such amounts are not deductible for tax purposes .
acquisition of suros surgical systems , inc .
on july 27 , 2006 , the company completed the acquisition of suros surgical systems , inc .
( 201csuros 201d ) , pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger dated april 17 , 2006 .
the results of operations for suros have been included in the company 2019s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition as part of its mammography/breast care business segment .
suros , located in indianapolis , indiana , develops , manufactures and sells minimally invasive interventional breast biopsy technology and products for biopsy , tissue removal and biopsy site marking .
the initial aggregate purchase price for suros of approximately $ 248100 ( subject to adjustment ) consisted of 4600 shares of hologic common stock valued at $ 106500 , cash paid of $ 139000 , and approximately $ 2600 for acquisition related fees and expenses .
the company determined the fair value of the shares issued in connection with the acquisition in accordance with eitf issue no .
99-12 , determination of the measurement date for the market price of acquirer securities issued in a purchase business combination .
the components and allocation of the final purchase price , consists of the following approximate amounts: .

Table:
net tangible assets acquired as of july 27 2006	$ 13100
in-process research and development	4900
developed technology and know-how	46000
customer relationship	17900
trade name	5800
deferred income taxes	-21300 ( 21300 )
goodwill	181700
final purchase price	$ 248100

Post-table text:
the acquisition also provides for a two-year earn out .
the earn-out is payable in two annual cash installments equal to the incremental revenue growth in suros 2019 business in the two years following the closing .
the company has considered the provision of eitf issue no .
95-8 , accounting for contingent consideration paid to the shareholders of and acquired enterprise in a purchase business combination , and concluded that this contingent consideration represents additional purchase price .
during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 the company paid approximately $ 19000 to former suros shareholders for the first annual earn-out period resulting in an increase to goodwill for the same amount .
the company also accrued $ 24500 for the second and final earn-out related to suros 2019 incremental revenue growth during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 , with an increase to goodwill , of which $ 24400 had been paid as of september 27 , 2008 .
in addition to the earn-out discussed above , the company decreased goodwill in the amount of $ 1300 during the year ended september 27 , 2008 and increased goodwill in the amount of $ 210 during the year ended september 29 , 2007 .
the increase in 2007 was primarily related to recording a liability of approximately $ 550 in accordance with eitf 95-3 related to the termination of certain employees who have ceased all services for the company .
approximately $ 400 of this liability was paid during the year ended september 29 , 2007 and the balance was paid during fiscal 2008 .
this increase was partially offset by a decrease to goodwill as a result of a change in the valuation of certain assets and liabilities acquired based on information received during the year ended september 29 , 2007 .
the decrease in goodwill during 2008 was related to the reduction of an income tax liability .
there have been no other material changes to purchase price allocations. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percent of the increase in compensation cost recognized for rsus from 2008 to 2009

Pre-table text:
70| | duke realty corporation annual report 2009 the following table summarizes transactions for our rsus , excluding dividend equivalents , for 2009 : weighted average number of grant date restricted stock units rsus fair value .

Table:
restricted stock units	number of rsus	weighted average grant date fair value
rsus at december 31 2008	401375	$ 29.03
granted	1583616	$ 9.32
vested	-129352 ( 129352 )	$ 28.39
forfeited	-172033 ( 172033 )	$ 12.53
rsus at december 31 2009	1683606	$ 12.23

Post-table text:
compensation cost recognized for rsus totaled $ 7.3 million , $ 4.9 million and $ 3.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
as of december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 6.7 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested rsus granted under the plan , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.3 years .
( 14 ) financial instruments we are exposed to capital market risk , such as changes in interest rates .
in an effort to manage interest rate risk , we may enter into interest rate hedging arrangements from time to time .
we do not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes .
in november 2007 , we entered into forward starting interest swaps with notional amounts appropriate to hedge interest rates on $ 300.0 million of anticipated debt offerings in 2009 .
the forward starting swaps were appropriately designated and tested for effectiveness as cash flow hedges .
in march 2008 , we settled the forward starting swaps and made a cash payment of $ 14.6 million to the counterparties .
an effectiveness test was performed as of the settlement date and it was concluded that a highly effective cash flow hedge was still in place for the expected debt offering .
of the amount paid in settlement , approximately $ 700000 was immediately reclassified to interest expense , as the result of partial ineffectiveness calculated at the settlement date .
the net amount of $ 13.9 million was recorded in other comprehensive income ( 201coci 201d ) and is being recognized through interest expense over the life of the hedged debt offering , which took place in may 2008 .
the remaining unamortized amount included as a reduction to accumulated oci as of december 31 , 2009 is $ 9.3 million .
in august 2005 , we entered into $ 300.0 million of cash flow hedges through forward starting interest rate swaps to hedge interest rates on $ 300.0 million of anticipated debt offerings in 2007 .
the swaps qualified for hedge accounting , with any changes in fair value recorded in oci .
in conjunction with the september 2007 issuance of $ 300.0 million of senior unsecured notes , we terminated these cash flow hedges as designated .
the settlement amount received of $ 10.7 million is being recognized to earnings through a reduction of interest expense over the term of the hedged cash flows .
the remaining unamortized amount included as an increase to accumulated oci as of december 31 , 2009 is $ 8.2 million .
the ineffective portion of the hedge was insignificant .
the effectiveness of our hedges is evaluated throughout their lives using the hypothetical derivative method under which the change in fair value of the actual swap designated as the hedging instrument is compared to the change in fair value of a hypothetical swap .
we had no material interest rate derivatives , when considering both fair value and notional amount , at december 31 , 2009. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
as of december 2007 what was the ratio of the future debt maturities for 2011 to the amounts after 2012

Pre-table text:
before the purchase in november 2008 , the units will be reflected in diluted earnings per share calculations using the treasury stock method as defined by sfas no .
128 , earnings per share .
under this method , the number of shares of common stock used in calculating diluted earnings per share ( based on the settlement formula applied at the end of the reporting period ) is deemed to be increased by the excess , if any , of the number of shares that would be issued upon settlement of the purchase contracts less the number of shares that could be purchased by the company in the market at the average market price during the period using the proceeds to be received upon settlement .
therefore , dilution will occur for periods when the average market price of the company 2019s common stock for the reporting period is above $ 21.816 .
senior secured revolving credit facility in september 2005 , the company entered into a $ 250 million , three-year senior secured revolving credit facility .
as a result of the citadel investment in november 2007 , the facility was terminated and all unamortized debt issuance costs were expensed .
corporate debt covenants certain of the company 2019s corporate debt described above have terms which include customary financial covenants .
as of december 31 , 2007 , the company was in compliance with all such covenants .
early extinguishment of debt in 2006 , the company called the entire remaining $ 185.2 million principal amount of its 6% ( 6 % ) notes for redemption .
the company recorded a $ 0.7 million loss on early extinguishment of debt relating to the write-off of the unamortized debt offering costs .
the company did not have any early extinguishments of debt in 2005 .
other corporate debt the company also has multiple term loans from financial institutions .
these loans are collateralized by equipment and are included within other borrowings on the consolidated balance sheet .
see note 14 2014securities sold under agreement to repurchase and other borrowings .
future maturities of corporate debt scheduled principal payments of corporate debt as of december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( dollars in thousands ) : years ending december 31 .

Table:
2008	$ 2014
2009	2014
2010	2014
2011	453815
2012	2014
thereafter	2996337
total future principal payments of corporate debt	3450152
unamortized discount net	-427454 ( 427454 )
total corporate debt	$ 3022698

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
north american consumer packaging net sales where what percentage of consumer packaging sales in 2008?

Pre-table text:
for uncoated freesheet paper and market pulp announced at the end of 2009 become effective .
input costs are expected to be higher due to wood supply constraints at the kwidzyn mill and annual tariff increases on energy in russia .
planned main- tenance outage costs are expected to be about flat , while operating costs should be favorable .
asian printing papers net sales were approx- imately $ 50 million in 2009 compared with approx- imately $ 20 million in both 2008 and 2007 .
operating earnings increased slightly in 2009 compared with 2008 , but were less than $ 1 million in all periods .
u.s .
market pulp net sales in 2009 totaled $ 575 million compared with $ 750 million in 2008 and $ 655 million in 2007 .
operating earnings in 2009 were $ 140 million ( a loss of $ 71 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and plant closure costs ) compared with a loss of $ 156 million ( a loss of $ 33 million excluding costs associated with the perma- nent shutdown of the bastrop mill ) in 2008 and earn- ings of $ 78 million in 2007 .
sales volumes in 2009 decreased from 2008 levels due to weaker global demand .
average sales price realizations were significantly lower as the decline in demand resulted in significant price declines for market pulp and smaller declines in fluff pulp .
input costs for wood , energy and chemicals decreased , and freight costs were significantly lower .
mill operating costs were favorable across all mills , and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower .
lack-of-order downtime in 2009 increased to approx- imately 540000 tons , including 480000 tons related to the permanent shutdown of our bastrop mill in the fourth quarter of 2008 , compared with 135000 tons in 2008 .
in the first quarter of 2010 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , reflecting improving customer demand for fluff pulp , offset by slightly seasonally weaker demand for softwood and hard- wood pulp in china .
average sales price realizations are expected to improve , reflecting the realization of previously announced sales price increases for fluff pulp , hardwood pulp and softwood pulp .
input costs are expected to increase for wood , energy and chemicals , and freight costs may also increase .
planned maintenance downtime costs will be higher , but operating costs should be about flat .
consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity .
in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix .
consumer packaging net sales in 2009 decreased 4% ( 4 % ) compared with 2008 and increased 1% ( 1 % ) compared with 2007 .
operating profits increased significantly compared with both 2008 and 2007 .
excluding alternative fuel mixture credits and facility closure costs , 2009 operating profits were sig- nificantly higher than 2008 and 57% ( 57 % ) higher than 2007 .
benefits from higher average sales price realizations ( $ 114 million ) , lower raw material and energy costs ( $ 114 million ) , lower freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , lower costs associated with the reorganiza- tion of the shorewood business ( $ 23 million ) , favor- able foreign exchange effects ( $ 14 million ) and other items ( $ 12 million ) were partially offset by lower sales volumes and increased lack-of-order downtime ( $ 145 million ) and costs associated with the perma- nent shutdown of the franklin mill ( $ 67 million ) .
additionally , operating profits in 2009 included $ 330 million of alternative fuel mixture credits .
consumer packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 .

Table:
in millions	2009	2008	2007
sales	$ 3060	$ 3195	$ 3015
operating profit	433	17	112

Post-table text:
north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.2 billion compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2008 and $ 2.4 billion in 2007 .
operating earnings in 2009 were $ 343 million ( $ 87 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and facility closure costs ) compared with $ 8 million ( $ 38 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2008 and $ 70 million in 2007 .
coated paperboard sales volumes were lower in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting weaker market conditions .
average sales price realizations were significantly higher , reflecting the full-year realization of price increases implemented in the second half of 2008 .
raw material costs for wood , energy and chemicals were significantly lower in 2009 , while freight costs were also favorable .
operating costs , however , were unfavorable and planned main- tenance downtime costs were higher .
lack-of-order downtime increased to 300000 tons in 2009 from 15000 tons in 2008 due to weak demand .
operating results in 2009 include income of $ 330 million for alternative fuel mixture credits and $ 67 million of expenses for shutdown costs for the franklin mill .
foodservice sales volumes were lower in 2009 than in 2008 due to generally weak world-wide economic conditions .
average sales price realizations were .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns in millions for fiscal 2018 and 2017?

Pre-table text:
table of contents adobe inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) certain states and foreign jurisdictions to fully utilize available tax credits and other attributes .
the deferred tax assets are offset by a valuation allowance to the extent it is more likely than not that they are not expected to be realized .
we provide u.s .
income taxes on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries unless the subsidiaries 2019 earnings are considered permanently reinvested outside the united states or are exempted from taxation as a result of the new territorial tax system .
to the extent that the foreign earnings previously treated as permanently reinvested are repatriated , the related u.s .
tax liability may be reduced by any foreign income taxes paid on these earnings .
as of november 30 , 2018 , the cumulative amount of earnings upon which u.s .
income taxes have not been provided is approximately $ 275 million .
the unrecognized deferred tax liability for these earnings is approximately $ 57.8 million .
as of november 30 , 2018 , we have net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 881.1 million for federal and $ 349.7 million for state .
we also have federal , state and foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $ 8.8 million , $ 189.9 million and $ 14.9 million , respectively .
the net operating loss carryforward assets and tax credits will expire in various years from fiscal 2019 through 2036 .
the state tax credit carryforwards and a portion of the federal net operating loss carryforwards can be carried forward indefinitely .
the net operating loss carryforward assets and certain credits are reduced by the valuation allowance and are subject to an annual limitation under internal revenue code section 382 , the carrying amount of which are expected to be fully realized .
as of november 30 , 2018 , a valuation allowance of $ 174.5 million has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to certain state and foreign assets .
for fiscal 2018 , the total change in the valuation allowance was $ 80.9 million .
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2018 and 2017 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
	2018	2017
beginning balance	$ 172945	$ 178413
gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions	16191	3680
gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions	-4000 ( 4000 )	-30166 ( 30166 )
gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions	60721	24927
settlements with taxing authorities	2014	-3876 ( 3876 )
lapse of statute of limitations	-45922 ( 45922 )	-8819 ( 8819 )
foreign exchange gains and losses	-3783 ( 3783 )	8786
ending balance	$ 196152	$ 172945

Post-table text:
the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns were approximately $ 24.6 million and $ 23.6 million for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively .
these amounts were included in long-term income taxes payable in their respective years .
we file income tax returns in the united states on a federal basis and in many u.s .
state and foreign jurisdictions .
we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities .
our major tax jurisdictions are ireland , california and the united states .
for ireland , california and the united states , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2008 , 2014 and 2015 , respectively .
we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from these examinations .
we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position .
the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process .
these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance of short-term and long- term assets , liabilities and income taxes payable .
we believe that within the next 12 months , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both .
given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential effect in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 45 million. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return for the five year period ended 31-dec-2017 of citi common stock and s&p financials?

Pre-table text:
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 .
the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .
comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

Table:
date	citi	s&p 500	s&p financials
31-dec-2012	100.0	100.0	100.0
31-dec-2013	131.8	132.4	135.6
31-dec-2014	137.0	150.5	156.2
31-dec-2015	131.4	152.6	153.9
31-dec-2016	152.3	170.8	188.9
31-dec-2017	193.5	208.1	230.9

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
if there were 50 facilities being rated in 2009 , how many were bbb/baa?

Pre-table text:
market street commitments by credit rating ( a ) december 31 , december 31 .

Table:
	december 31 2009	december 312008
aaa/aaa	14% ( 14 % )	19% ( 19 % )
aa/aa	50	6
a/a	34	72
bbb/baa	2	3
total	100% ( 100 % )	100% ( 100 % )

Post-table text:
( a ) the majority of our facilities are not explicitly rated by the rating agencies .
all facilities are structured to meet rating agency standards for applicable rating levels .
we evaluated the design of market street , its capital structure , the note , and relationships among the variable interest holders .
based on this analysis and under accounting guidance effective during 2009 and 2008 , we are not the primary beneficiary and therefore the assets and liabilities of market street are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .
we considered changes to the variable interest holders ( such as new expected loss note investors and changes to program- level credit enhancement providers ) , terms of expected loss notes , and new types of risks related to market street as reconsideration events .
we reviewed the activities of market street on at least a quarterly basis to determine if a reconsideration event has occurred .
tax credit investments we make certain equity investments in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies ( llcs ) that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the low income housing tax credit ( lihtc ) pursuant to sections 42 and 47 of the internal revenue code .
the purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital , to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings and to assist us in achieving goals associated with the community reinvestment act .
the primary activities of the investments include the identification , development and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants .
generally , these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity .
we typically invest in these partnerships as a limited partner or non-managing member .
also , we are a national syndicator of affordable housing equity ( together with the investments described above , the 201clihtc investments 201d ) .
in these syndication transactions , we create funds in which our subsidiaries are the general partner or managing member and sell limited partnership or non-managing member interests to third parties , and in some cases may also purchase a limited partnership or non-managing member interest in the fund .
the purpose of this business is to generate income from the syndication of these funds , generate servicing fees by managing the funds , and earn tax credits to reduce our tax liability .
general partner or managing member activities include selecting , evaluating , structuring , negotiating , and closing the fund investments in operating limited partnerships , as well as oversight of the ongoing operations of the fund portfolio .
we evaluate our interests and third party interests in the limited partnerships/llcs in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary .
the primary beneficiary determination is based on which party absorbs a majority of the variability .
the primary sources of variability in lihtc investments are the tax credits , tax benefits due to passive losses on the investments and development and operating cash flows .
we have consolidated lihtc investments in which we absorb a majority of the variability and thus are considered the primary beneficiary .
the assets are primarily included in equity investments and other assets on our consolidated balance sheet with the liabilities classified in other liabilities and third party investors 2019 interests included in the equity section as noncontrolling interests .
neither creditors nor equity investors in the lihtc investments have any recourse to our general credit .
the consolidated aggregate assets and liabilities of these lihtc investments are provided in the consolidated vies 2013 pnc is primary beneficiary table and reflected in the 201cother 201d business segment .
we also have lihtc investments in which we are not the primary beneficiary , but are considered to have a significant variable interest based on our interests in the partnership/llc .
these investments are disclosed in the non-consolidated vies 2013 significant variable interests table .
the table also reflects our maximum exposure to loss .
our maximum exposure to loss is equal to our legally binding equity commitments adjusted for recorded impairment and partnership results .
we use the equity and cost methods to account for our investment in these entities with the investments reflected in equity investments on our consolidated balance sheet .
in addition , we increase our recognized investments and recognize a liability for all legally binding unfunded equity commitments .
these liabilities are reflected in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .
credit risk transfer transaction national city bank , ( a former pnc subsidiary which merged into pnc bank , n.a .
in november 2009 ) sponsored a special purpose entity ( spe ) and concurrently entered into a credit risk transfer agreement with an independent third party to mitigate credit losses on a pool of nonconforming mortgage loans originated by its former first franklin business unit .
the spe was formed with a small equity contribution and was structured as a bankruptcy-remote entity so that its creditors have no recourse to us .
in exchange for a perfected security interest in the cash flows of the nonconforming mortgage loans , the spe issued to us asset-backed securities in the form of senior , mezzanine , and subordinated equity notes .
the spe was deemed to be a vie as its equity was not sufficient to finance its activities .
we were determined to be the primary beneficiary of the spe as we would absorb the majority of the expected losses of the spe through our holding of the asset-backed securities .
accordingly , this spe was consolidated and all of the entity 2019s assets , liabilities , and .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what will be the yearly interest expense for entergy louisiana for the bond issued in 2012 , ( in millions ) ?

Pre-table text:
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis all debt and common and preferred membership interest issuances by entergy louisiana require prior regulatory approval .
preferred membership interest and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements .
entergy louisiana has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs .
entergy louisiana 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .

Table:
2011	2010	2009	2008
( in thousands )	( in thousands )	( in thousands )	( in thousands )
( $ 118415 )	$ 49887	$ 52807	$ 61236

Post-table text:
see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool .
entergy louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $ 200 million scheduled to expire in august 2012 .
as of december 31 , 2011 , $ 50 million was outstanding on the credit facility .
entergy louisiana obtained short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow through october 2013 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 250 million .
see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy louisiana 2019s short-term borrowing limits .
entergy louisiana has also obtained an order from the ferc authorizing long-term securities issuances through july 2013 .
in january 2012 , entergy louisiana issued $ 250 million of 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) series first mortgage bonds due december 2014 .
entergy louisiana used the proceeds to repay short-term borrowings under the entergy system money pool .
little gypsy repowering project in april 2007 , entergy louisiana announced that it intended to pursue the solid fuel repowering of a 538 mw unit at its little gypsy plant .
in march 2009 the lpsc voted in favor of a motion directing entergy louisiana to temporarily suspend the repowering project and , based upon an analysis of the project 2019s economic viability , to make a recommendation regarding whether to proceed with the project .
this action was based upon a number of factors including the recent decline in natural gas prices , as well as environmental concerns , the unknown costs of carbon legislation and changes in the capital/financial markets .
in april 2009 , entergy louisiana complied with the lpsc 2019s directive and recommended that the project be suspended for an extended period of time of three years or more .
in may 2009 the lpsc issued an order declaring that entergy louisiana 2019s decision to place the little gypsy project into a longer-term suspension of three years or more is in the public interest and prudent .
in october 2009 , entergy louisiana made a filing with the lpsc seeking permission to cancel the little gypsy repowering project and seeking project cost recovery over a five-year period .
in june 2010 and august 2010 , the lpsc staff and intervenors filed testimony .
the lpsc staff ( 1 ) agreed that it was prudent to move the project from long-term suspension to cancellation and that the timing of the decision to suspend on a longer-term basis was not imprudent ; ( 2 ) indicated that , except for $ 0.8 million in compensation-related costs , the costs incurred should be deemed prudent ; ( 3 ) recommended recovery from customers over ten years but stated that the lpsc may want to consider 15 years ; ( 4 ) allowed for recovery of carrying costs and earning a return on project costs , but at a reduced rate approximating the cost of debt , while also acknowledging that the lpsc may consider ordering no return ; and ( 5 ) indicated that entergy louisiana should be directed to securitize project costs , if legally feasible and in the public interest .
in the third quarter 2010 , in accordance with accounting standards , entergy louisiana determined that it was probable that the little gypsy repowering project would be abandoned and accordingly reclassified $ 199.8 million of project costs from construction work in progress to a regulatory asset .
a hearing on the issues , except for cost allocation among customer classes , was held before the alj in november 2010 .
in january 2011 all parties participated in a mediation on the disputed issues , resulting in a settlement of all disputed issues , including cost recovery and cost allocation .
the settlement provides for entergy louisiana to recover $ 200 million as of march 31 , 2011 , and carrying costs on that amount on specified terms thereafter .
the settlement also provides for entergy louisiana to recover the approved project costs by securitization .
in april 2011 , entergy .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the interest expense in 2015 assuming that all the debt is interest bearing debt , ( in billions ) ?

Pre-table text:
in addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs .
these credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries .
borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 .
commercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .
and in europe .
at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding .
effective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s .
was increased by $ 2.0 billion .
as a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .
and in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion .
we expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements .
sale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions .
these arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse .
the trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets .
we sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing .
pmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions .
the trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively .
the net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows .
for further details , see item 8 , note 23 .
sale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements .
debt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 .
our total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature .
for further details , see item 8 , note 7 .
indebtedness .
the weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 .
see item 8 , note 16 .
fair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt .
the amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors .
on february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s .
securities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period .
our debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s .
dollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s .
dollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 .
the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .
the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 .
2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .

Table:
type		face value	interest rate	issuance	maturity
u.s . dollar notes	( a )	$ 500	1.250% ( 1.250 % )	august 2015	august 2017
u.s . dollar notes	( a )	$ 750	3.375% ( 3.375 % )	august 2015	august 2025

Post-table text:
in addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs .
these credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries .
borrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 .
commercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .
and in europe .
at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding .
effective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s .
was increased by $ 2.0 billion .
as a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .
and in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion .
we expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements .
sale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions .
these arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse .
the trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets .
we sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing .
pmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions .
the trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively .
the net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows .
for further details , see item 8 , note 23 .
sale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements .
debt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 .
our total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature .
for further details , see item 8 , note 7 .
indebtedness .
the weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 .
see item 8 , note 16 .
fair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt .
the amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors .
on february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s .
securities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period .
our debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s .
dollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s .
dollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 .
the net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .
the weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 .
2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what were capital expenditures associated with the retail segment since its inception , exclusive of the amount incurred during 2003 , in millions?

Pre-table text:
24 of 93 net sales in japan remained flat during 2002 versus 2001 , with a slight decline in unit sales of 2% ( 2 % ) .
consistent with the company 2019s other geographic operating segments , during 2002 japan showed growth in unit sales of consumer systems and a decline in unit sales of power macintosh systems .
japan 2019s imac unit sales increased 85% ( 85 % ) in 2002 .
however , in the case of japan the increase in imac unit shipments in 2002 versus 2001 was primarily the result of the unusually depressed level of net sales experienced by the company in the first quarter of 2001 as discussed above .
additionally , net sales in japan on a sequential and year-over-year comparative basis generally worsened as 2002 progressed reflecting particularly poor economic conditions in japan .
retail the company opened 25 new retail stores during 2003 , bringing the total number of open stores to 65 as of september 27 , 2003 , which compares to 40 open stores as of september 28 , 2002 and 8 open stores as of september 29 , 2001 .
during the first quarter of fiscal 2004 , the company opened 9 additional stores including its first international store in the ginza in tokyo , japan .
the retail segment 2019s net sales grew to $ 621 million during 2003 from $ 283 million in 2002 and from $ 19 million in 2001 .
the $ 338 million or 119% ( 119 % ) increase in net sales during 2003 reflects the impact from opening 25 new stores in 2003 , the full year impact of 2002 store openings , as well as an increase in average revenue per store .
total macintosh sales increased by approximately $ 170 million of which $ 108 million related to year-over-year increases in powerbook sales .
the retail segment has also contributed strongly to the increases in net sales of peripherals , software and services experienced by the company during 2003 .
during 2003 , approximately 45% ( 45 % ) of the retail segment 2019s net sales came from the sale of apple-branded and third-party peripherals , software and services as compared to 28% ( 28 % ) for the company as a whole .
with an average of 54 stores open during 2003 , the retail segment achieved annualized revenue per store of approximately $ 11.5 million , as compared to approximately $ 10.2 million based on an average of 28 stores open in 2002 .
as measured by the company 2019s operating segment reporting , the retail segment improved from a loss of $ 22 million during 2002 to a loss of $ 5 million during 2003 .
this improvement is primarily attributable to the segment 2019s year-over-year increase in net sales , which resulted in higher leverage on occupancy , depreciation and other fixed costs .
expansion of the retail segment has required and will continue to require a substantial investment in fixed assets and related infrastructure , operating lease commitments , personnel , and other operating expenses .
capital expenditures associated with the retail segment since its inception totaled approximately $ 290 million through the end of fiscal 2003 , $ 92 million of which was incurred during 2003 .
as of september 27 , 2003 , the retail segment had approximately 1300 employees and had outstanding operating lease commitments associated with retail store space and related facilities of $ 354 million .
the company would incur substantial costs should it choose to terminate its retail segment or close individual stores .
such costs could adversely affect the company 2019s results of operations and financial condition .
investment in a new business model such as the retail segment is inherently risky , particularly in light of the significant investment involved , the current economic climate , and the fixed nature of a substantial portion of the retail segment 2019s operating expenses .
gross margin gross margin for the three fiscal years ended september 27 , 2003 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : .

Table:
	2003	2002	2001
net sales	$ 6207	$ 5742	$ 5363
cost of sales	4499	4139	4128
gross margin	$ 1708	$ 1603	$ 1235
gross margin percentage	27.5% ( 27.5 % )	27.9% ( 27.9 % )	23.0% ( 23.0 % )

Post-table text:
gross margin decreased to 27.5% ( 27.5 % ) of net sales in 2003 from 27.9% ( 27.9 % ) of net sales in 2002 .
this decline in gross margin reflects relatively aggressive pricing actions on several macintosh models instituted by the company beginning in late fiscal 2002 as a result of continued pricing pressure throughout the personal computer industry , lower sales of relatively higher margin power macintosh systems during the first three fiscal quarters of 2003 , and increased air freight and manufacturing costs associated with the production ramp-up of the new power mac g5 and 15-inch powerbook , both of which began shipping in volume during september 2003 .
this decline is also attributable to a rise in certain component costs as the year progressed .
the aforementioned negative factors affecting gross margins during 2003 were partially offset by the increase in higher margin software and direct sales .
the company anticipates that its gross margin and the gross margin of the overall personal computer industry will remain under pressure throughout fiscal 2004 in light of weak economic conditions , price competition in the personal computer industry , and potential increases in component pricing .
the company also expects to continue to incur air freight charges on the power mac g5 and other products during 2004 .
the foregoing statements regarding the company 2019s expected gross margin during 2004 , general demand for personal computers , anticipated industry component pricing , anticipated air freight charges , and future economic conditions are forward-looking .
there can be no assurance that current gross margins will be maintained , targeted gross margin levels will be achieved , or current margins on existing individual products will be maintained .
in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the difference in payments between entergy arkansas and entergy new orleans , in millions?

Pre-table text:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements entergy arkansas made its payment in january 2012 .
in february 2012 , entergy arkansas filed for an interim adjustment to its production cost allocation rider requesting that the $ 156 million payment be collected from customers over the 22-month period from march 2012 through december 2013 .
in march 2012 the apsc issued an order stating that the payment can be recovered from retail customers through the production cost allocation rider , subject to refund .
the lpsc and the apsc have requested rehearing of the ferc 2019s october 2011 order .
in december 2013 the lpsc filed a petition for a writ of mandamus at the united states court of appeals for the d.c .
circuit .
in its petition , the lpsc requested that the d.c .
circuit issue an order compelling the ferc to issue a final order on pending rehearing requests .
in january 2014 the d.c .
circuit denied the lpsc 2019s petition .
the apsc , the lpsc , the puct , and other parties intervened in the december 2011 compliance filing proceeding , and the apsc and the lpsc also filed protests .
in february 2014 the ferc issued a rehearing order addressing its october 2011 order .
the ferc denied the lpsc 2019s request for rehearing on the issues of whether the bandwidth remedy should be made effective earlier than june 1 , 2005 , and whether refunds should be ordered for the 20-month refund effective period .
the ferc granted the lpsc 2019s rehearing request on the issue of interest on the bandwidth payments/receipts for the june - december 2005 period , requiring that interest be accrued from june 1 , 2006 until the date those bandwidth payments/receipts are made .
also in february 2014 the ferc issued an order rejecting the december 2011 compliance filing that calculated the bandwidth payments/receipts for the june - december 2005 period .
the ferc order required a new compliance filing that calculates the bandwidth payments/receipts for the june - december 2005 period based on monthly data for the seven individual months including interest pursuant to the february 2014 rehearing order .
entergy has sought rehearing of the february 2014 orders with respect to the ferc 2019s determinations regarding interest .
in april 2014 the lpsc filed a petition for review of the ferc 2019s october 2011 and february 2014 orders with the u.s .
court of appeals for the d.c .
circuit .
the appeal is pending .
in april and may 2014 , entergy filed with the ferc an updated compliance filing that provides the payments and receipts among the utility operating companies pursuant to the ferc 2019s february 2014 orders .
the filing shows the following net payments and receipts , including interest , among the utility operating companies : payments ( receipts ) ( in millions ) .

Table:
	payments ( receipts ) ( in millions )
entergy arkansas	$ 68
entergy louisiana	( $ 10 )
entergy mississippi	( $ 11 )
entergy new orleans	$ 2
entergy texas	( $ 49 )

Post-table text:
these payments were made in may 2014 .
the lpsc , city council , and apsc have filed protests. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the average rental expense , net of sublease income from 2004 to 2006 in millions

Pre-table text:
53management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in order to borrow funds under the 5-year credit facility , the company must be in compliance with various conditions , covenants and representations contained in the agreements .
the company was in compliance with the terms of the 5-year credit facility at december 31 , 2006 .
the company has never borrowed under its domestic revolving credit facilities .
utilization of the non-u.s .
credit facilities may also be dependent on the company's ability to meet certain conditions at the time a borrowing is requested .
contractual obligations , guarantees , and other purchase commitments contractual obligations summarized in the table below are the company's obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations ( assuming earliest possible exercise of put rights by holders ) , lease payment obligations , and purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2006 .
payments due by period ( 1 ) ( in millions ) total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 thereafter .

Table:
( in millions )	payments due by period ( 1 ) total	payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007	payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008	payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009	payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010	payments due by period ( 1 ) 2011	payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter
long-term debt obligations	$ 4134	$ 1340	$ 198	$ 4	$ 534	$ 607	$ 1451
lease obligations	2328	351	281	209	178	158	1151
purchase obligations	1035	326	120	26	12	12	539
total contractual obligations	$ 7497	$ 2017	$ 599	$ 239	$ 724	$ 777	$ 3141

Post-table text:
( 1 ) amounts included represent firm , non-cancelable commitments .
debt obligations : at december 31 , 2006 , the company's long-term debt obligations , including current maturities and unamortized discount and issue costs , totaled $ 4.1 billion , as compared to $ 4.0 billion at december 31 , 2005 .
a table of all outstanding long-term debt securities can be found in note 4 , ""debt and credit facilities'' to the company's consolidated financial statements .
lease obligations : the company owns most of its major facilities , but does lease certain office , factory and warehouse space , land , and information technology and other equipment under principally non-cancelable operating leases .
at december 31 , 2006 , future minimum lease obligations , net of minimum sublease rentals , totaled $ 2.3 billion .
rental expense , net of sublease income , was $ 241 million in 2006 , $ 250 million in 2005 and $ 205 million in 2004 .
purchase obligations : the company has entered into agreements for the purchase of inventory , license of software , promotional agreements , and research and development agreements which are firm commitments and are not cancelable .
the longest of these agreements extends through 2015 .
total payments expected to be made under these agreements total $ 1.0 billion .
commitments under other long-term agreements : the company has entered into certain long-term agreements to purchase software , components , supplies and materials from suppliers .
most of the agreements extend for periods of one to three years ( three to five years for software ) .
however , generally these agreements do not obligate the company to make any purchases , and many permit the company to terminate the agreement with advance notice ( usually ranging from 60 to 180 days ) .
if the company were to terminate these agreements , it generally would be liable for certain termination charges , typically based on work performed and supplier on-hand inventory and raw materials attributable to canceled orders .
the company's liability would only arise in the event it terminates the agreements for reasons other than ""cause.'' the company also enters into a number of arrangements for the sourcing of supplies and materials with minimum purchase commitments and take-or-pay obligations .
the majority of the minimum purchase obligations under these contracts are over the life of the contract as opposed to a year-by-year take-or-pay .
if these agreements were terminated at december 31 , 2006 , the company's obligation would not have been significant .
the company does not anticipate the cancellation of any of these agreements in the future .
subsequent to the end of 2006 , the company entered into take-or-pay arrangements with suppliers through may 2009 with minimum purchase obligations of $ 2.2 billion during that period .
the company estimates purchases during that period that exceed the minimum obligations .
the company outsources certain corporate functions , such as benefit administration and information technology-related services .
these contracts are expected to expire in 2013 .
the total remaining payments under these contracts are approximately $ 1.3 billion over the remaining seven years ; however , these contracts can be %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c11830 pcn : 055000000 *** %%pcmsg| |00030|yes|no|02/28/2007 13:05|0|1|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . compared to the nasdaq composite for the period ending 12/29/2018?

Pre-table text:
part ii .
item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns .
as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock .
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .
fiscal year ending december 29 .
copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global .
all rights reserved .
nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc .
s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .

Table:
	12/28/2013	1/3/2015	1/2/2016	12/31/2016	12/30/2017	12/29/2018
cadence design systems inc .	$ 100.00	$ 135.18	$ 149.39	$ 181.05	$ 300.22	$ 311.13
nasdaq composite	100.00	112.60	113.64	133.19	172.11	165.84
s&p 500	100.00	110.28	109.54	129.05	157.22	150.33
s&p 500 information technology	100.00	115.49	121.08	144.85	201.10	200.52

Post-table text:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
considering the year 2016 , what was the percentual increase in the high sale price observed during the first and second quarters?

Pre-table text:
part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities .
the company 2019s common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange .
prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company , the company 2019s common stock traded under the symbol 201caa . 201d in connection with the separation , on november 1 , 2016 , the company changed its stock symbol and its common stock began trading under the symbol 201carnc . 201d on october 5 , 2016 , the company 2019s common shareholders approved a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of the company 2019s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock ( the 201creverse stock split 201d ) .
as a result of the reverse stock split , every 3 shares of issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one issued and outstanding share of common stock , without any change in the par value per share .
the reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares , and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares .
the company 2019s common stock began trading on a reverse stock split-adjusted basis on october 6 , 2016 .
on november 1 , 2016 , the company completed the separation of its business into two independent , publicly traded companies : the company and alcoa corporation .
the separation was effected by means of a pro rata distribution by the company of 80.1% ( 80.1 % ) of the outstanding shares of alcoa corporation common stock to the company 2019s shareholders .
the company 2019s shareholders of record as of the close of business on october 20 , 2016 ( the 201crecord date 201d ) received one share of alcoa corporation common stock for every three shares of the company 2019s common stock held as of the record date .
the company retained 19.9% ( 19.9 % ) of the outstanding common stock of alcoa corporation immediately following the separation .
the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 .
the prices listed below for the fourth quarter of 2016 do not reflect any adjustment for the impact of the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , and therefore are not comparable to pre-separation prices from earlier periods. .

Table:
quarter	2016 high	2016 low	2016 dividend	2016 high	2016 low	dividend
first	$ 30.66	$ 18.42	$ 0.09	$ 51.30	$ 37.95	$ 0.09
second	34.50	26.34	0.09	42.87	33.45	0.09
third	32.91	27.09	0.09	33.69	23.91	0.09
fourth ( separation occurred on november 1 2016 )	32.10	16.75	0.09	33.54	23.43	0.09
year	$ 34.50	$ 16.75	$ 0.36	$ 51.30	$ 23.43	$ 0.36

Post-table text:
the number of holders of record of common stock was approximately 12885 as of february 23 , 2017. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the net change in net revenue during 2016?

Pre-table text:
amortized over a nine-year period beginning december 2015 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather during the unbilled period and an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales .
the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry , and increased demand from new customers , primarily in the industrial gases industry .
the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc .
the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike .
see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .
included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . a0 see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .
entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2015 net revenue	$ 1666
nuclear realized price changes	-149 ( 149 )
rhode island state energy center	-44 ( 44 )
nuclear volume	-36 ( 36 )
fitzpatrick reimbursement agreement	41
nuclear fuel expenses	68
other	-4 ( 4 )
2016 net revenue	$ 1542

Post-table text:
as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 124 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices and lower capacity prices , the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa , and vermont yankee capacity revenue .
the effect of the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa and vermont yankee capacity revenue on the net revenue variance from 2015 to 2016 is minimal ; 2022 the sale of the rhode island state energy center in december 2015 .
see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale ; and 2022 lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more refueling outage days in 2016 as compared to 2015 and larger exercise of resupply options in 2016 as compared to 2015 .
see 201cnuclear matters - indian point 201d below for discussion of the extended indian point 2 outage in the second quarter entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
the non-recurring charge for the office facility closing was what percent of lease expense in 2006?

Pre-table text:
abiomed , inc .
and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( 7 ) commitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no .
45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no .
5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no .
34 ( fin no .
45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses .
these disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no .
5 accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote .
the following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor .
product warranties 2014the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale .
the ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards .
operating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision .
patent indemnifications 2014in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products .
the indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims .
the company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions .
under the provisions of fin no .
45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only .
as of march 31 , 2006 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 .
the danvers lease may be extended , at the company 2019s option , for two successive additional periods of five years each with monthly rent charges to be determined based on then current fair rental values .
the company 2019s lease for its aachen location expires in august 2008 unless an option to extend for an additional four years is exercised by the company .
in december 2005 we closed our office facility in the netherlands , recording a charge of approximately $ 58000 for the remaining lease term .
total rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations approximated $ 821000 , $ 824000 and $ 1262000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2004 , 2005 and 2006 , respectively .
future minimum lease payments under all significant non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2006 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : fiscal year ending march 31 , operating leases .

Table:
fiscal year ending march 31,	operating leases
2007	1703
2008	1371
2009	1035
2010	710
total future minimum lease payments	$ 4819

Post-table text:
from time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types .
while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , cash flow and results .
on may 15 , 2006 richard a .
nazarian , as selling stockholder representative , filed a demand for arbitration ( subsequently amended ) with the boston office of the american arbitration association .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in 2019 what was the percent of the financing structure that was based on the equity

Pre-table text:
debt-related activities certain measures relating to our total debt were as follows: .

Table:
	2019	2018	2017
total debt ( millions of dollars )	$ 19390	$ 21496	$ 18870
short-term debt as a percentage of total debt	6.8% ( 6.8 % )	12.1% ( 12.1 % )	1.1% ( 1.1 % )
weighted average cost of total debt	2.9% ( 2.9 % )	3.2% ( 3.2 % )	3.3% ( 3.3 % )
total debt as a percentage of total capital ( a )	45.6% ( 45.6 % )	47.8% ( 47.8 % )	57.5% ( 57.5 % )

Post-table text:
( a ) represents shareholders 2019 equity , net non-current deferred income tax liabilities , and debt .
the decrease in short-term debt as a percentage of total debt at september 30 , 2019 was primarily driven by the payment of certain short-term notes as well as the issuance of long-term notes in 2019 .
the increase in short-term debt as a percentage of total debt at september 30 , 2018 was primarily driven by the reclassification of certain notes from long-term to short-term .
additional disclosures regarding our debt instruments are provided in note 16 to the consolidated financial statements contained in item 8 .
financial statements and supplementary data .
cash and short-term investments at september 30 , 2019 , total worldwide cash and short-term investments were $ 620 million , including restricted cash , which was primarily held in jurisdictions outside of the united states .
financing facilities in may 2017 , we entered into a five-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility which provides borrowing of up to $ 2.25 billion .
this facility will expire in december 2022 .
we are able to issue up to $ 100 million in letters of credit under this new revolving credit facility and it also includes a provision that enables bd , subject to additional commitments made by the lenders , to access up to an additional $ 500 million in financing through the facility for a maximum aggregate commitment of $ 2.75 billion .
we use proceeds from this facility to fund general corporate needs .
borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility at september 30 , 2019 were $ 485 million .
the agreement for our revolving credit facility contained the following financial covenants .
we were in compliance with these covenants as of september 30 , 2019 .
2022 we are required to maintain an interest expense coverage ratio of not less than 4-to-1 as of the last day of each fiscal quarter .
2022 we are required to have a leverage coverage ratio of no more than : 25e6 6-to-1 from the closing date of the bard acquisition until and including the first fiscal quarter- end thereafter ; 25e6 5.75-to-1 for the subsequent four fiscal quarters thereafter ; 25e6 5.25-to-1 for the subsequent four fiscal quarters thereafter ; 25e6 4.5-to-1 for the subsequent four fiscal quarters thereafter ; 25e6 4-to-1 for the subsequent four fiscal quarters thereafter ; 25e6 3.75-to-1 thereafter .
we also have informal lines of credit outside the united states .
during the fourth quarter of 2019 , the company fully repaid its borrowings outstanding on a 364-day senior unsecured term loan facility that the company entered in september 2018 .
the company had no commercial paper borrowings outstanding as of september 30 , 2019 .
we may , from time to time , sell certain trade receivable assets to third parties as we manage working capital over the normal course of our business activities. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}