[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in 2013 what was the percent of the total operating revenues from mexico

Pre-table text:
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201ccompany 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d .
1 .
nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad operating in the u.s .
our network includes 31838 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s .
gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways .
we own 26009 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases .
we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico .
export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders .
the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment .
although we provide and review revenue by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network .
the following table provides freight revenue by commodity group : millions 2013 2012 2011 .

Table:
millions	2013	2012	2011
agricultural	$ 3276	$ 3280	$ 3324
automotive	2077	1807	1510
chemicals	3501	3238	2815
coal	3978	3912	4084
industrial products	3822	3494	3166
intermodal	4030	3955	3609
total freight revenues	$ 20684	$ 19686	$ 18508
other revenues	1279	1240	1049
total operatingrevenues	$ 21963	$ 20926	$ 19557

Post-table text:
although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported by us are outside the u.s .
each of our commodity groups includes revenue from shipments to and from mexico .
included in the above table are revenues from our mexico business which amounted to $ 2.1 billion in 2013 , $ 1.9 billion in 2012 , and $ 1.8 billion in 2011 .
basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s .
( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) .
2 .
significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries .
investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .
all intercompany transactions are eliminated .
we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements .
cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less .
accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts .
the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions .
receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the net effect of the one-percentage point increase and decrease on total service and interest cost components

Pre-table text:
coupons and expected maturity values of individually selected bonds .
the yield curve was developed for a universe containing the majority of u.s.-issued aa-graded corporate bonds , all of which were non callable ( or callable with make-whole provisions ) .
historically , for each plan , the discount rate was developed as the level equivalent rate that would produce the same present value as that using spot rates aligned with the projected benefit payments .
the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on historical and projected rates of return , prior to administrative and investment management fees , for current and planned asset classes in the plans 2019 investment portfolios .
assumed projected rates of return for each of the plans 2019 projected asset classes were selected after analyzing historical experience and future expectations of the returns and volatility of the various asset classes .
based on the target asset allocation for each asset class , the overall expected rate of return for the portfolio was developed , adjusted for historical and expected experience of active portfolio management results compared to the benchmark returns and for the effect of expenses paid from plan assets .
the company 2019s pension expense increases as the expected return on assets decreases .
assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the other postretirement benefit plans .
the health care cost trend rate is based on historical rates and expected market conditions .
a one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects : percentage- increase percentage- decrease .

Table:
	one-percentage-pointincrease	one-percentage-pointdecrease
effect on total of service and interest cost components	$ 7367	$ -5974 ( 5974 )
effect on other postretirement benefit obligation	$ 72238	$ -60261 ( 60261 )

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the spread between the high and low henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mcf ) in 2009?

Pre-table text:
item 7 .
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are a global integrated energy company with significant operations in the north america , africa and europe .
our operations are organized into four reportable segments : 2022 exploration and production ( 201ce&p 201d ) which explores for , produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis .
2022 oil sands mining ( 201cosm 201d ) which mines , extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta , canada , and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas 2022 integrated gas ( 201cig 201d ) which markets and transports products manufactured from natural gas , such as liquefied natural gas ( 201clng 201d ) and methanol , on a worldwide basis .
2022 refining , marketing & transportation ( 201crm&t 201d ) which refines , markets and transports crude oil and petroleum products , primarily in the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states .
certain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward-looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business .
these statements typically contain words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201ctargets , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cprojects , 201d 201ccould , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould 201d or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain .
in accordance with 201csafe harbor 201d provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 , these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors , though not necessarily all such factors , which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements .
we hold a 60 percent interest in equatorial guinea lng holdings limited ( 201cegholdings 201d ) .
as discussed in note 4 to the consolidated financial statements , effective may 1 , 2007 , we ceased consolidating egholdings .
our investment is accounted for using the equity method of accounting .
unless specifically noted , amounts presented for the integrated gas segment for periods prior to may 1 , 2007 , include amounts related to the minority interests .
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1 .
business , item 1a .
risk factors , item 6 .
selected financial data and item 8 .
financial statements and supplementary data .
overview exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows .
prices were volatile in 2009 , but not as much as in the previous year .
prices in 2009 were also lower than in recent years as illustrated by the annual averages for key benchmark prices below. .

Table:
benchmark	2009	2008	2007
wti crude oil ( dollars per barrel )	$ 62.09	$ 99.75	$ 72.41
dated brent crude oil ( dollars per barrel )	$ 61.67	$ 97.26	$ 72.39
henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mcf ) ( a )	$ 3.99	$ 9.04	$ 6.86

Post-table text:
henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mcf ) ( a ) $ 3.99 $ 9.04 $ 6.86 ( a ) first-of-month price index .
crude oil prices rose sharply through the first half of 2008 as a result of strong global demand , a declining dollar , ongoing concerns about supplies of crude oil , and geopolitical risk .
later in 2008 , crude oil prices sharply declined as the u.s .
dollar rebounded and global demand decreased as a result of economic recession .
the price decrease continued into 2009 , but reversed after dropping below $ 33.98 in february , ending the year at $ 79.36 .
our domestic crude oil production is about 62 percent sour , which means that it contains more sulfur than light sweet wti does .
sour crude oil also tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil and sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil because of higher refining costs and lower refined product values .
our international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the dated brent crude benchmark .
the differential between wti and dated brent average prices narrowed to $ 0.42 in 2009 compared to $ 2.49 in 2008 and $ 0.02 in 2007. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in 2005 what percentage of consumer packaging sales were represented by foodservice net sales?

Pre-table text:
earnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2006 .
containerboard export sales volumes are expected to decline due to scheduled first-quarter main- tenance outages .
sales volumes for u.s .
converted products will be higher due to more shipping days , but expected softer demand should cause the ship- ments per day to decrease .
average sales price real- izations are expected to be comparable to fourth- quarter averages .
an additional containerboard price increase was announced in january that is expected to be fully realized in the second quarter .
costs for wood , energy , starch , adhesives and freight are expected to increase .
manufacturing costs will be higher due to costs associated with scheduled main- tenance outages in the containerboard mills .
euro- pean container operating results are expected to improve as seasonally higher sales volumes and improved margins more than offset slightly higher manufacturing costs .
consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity .
in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix .
consumer packaging net sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) compared with 2005 and 7% ( 7 % ) compared with 2004 .
operating profits rose 8% ( 8 % ) from 2005 , but declined 15% ( 15 % ) from 2004 levels .
compared with 2005 , higher sales volumes ( $ 9 million ) , improved average sales price realizations ( $ 33 million ) , reduced lack-of-order downtime ( $ 18 million ) , and favorable mill oper- ations ( $ 25 million ) were partially offset by higher raw material costs ( $ 19 million ) and freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , unfavorable mix ( $ 14 million ) and other costs ( $ 21 million ) .
consumer packaging in millions 2006 2005 2004 .

Table:
in millions	2006	2005	2004
sales	$ 2455	$ 2245	$ 2295
operating profit	$ 131	$ 121	$ 155

Post-table text:
coated paperboard net sales of $ 1.5 billion in 2006 were higher than $ 1.3 billion in 2005 and $ 1.1 billion in 2004 .
sales volumes increased in 2006 compared with 2005 , particularly in the folding car- ton board segment , reflecting improved demand for coated paperboard products .
in 2006 , our coated paperboard mills took 4000 tons of lack-of-order downtime , compared with 82000 tons of lack-of-order downtime in 2005 .
average sales price realizations were substantially improved in the cur- rent year , principally for folding carton board and cupstock board .
operating profits were 51% ( 51 % ) higher in 2006 than in 2005 , and 7% ( 7 % ) better than in 2004 .
the impact of the higher sales prices along with more favorable manufacturing operations due to strong performance at the mills more than offset higher input costs for energy and freight .
foodservice net sales declined to $ 396 million in 2006 , compared with $ 437 million in 2005 and $ 480 million in 2004 , due principally to the sale of the jackson , tennessee plant in july 2005 .
sales vol- umes were lower in 2006 than in 2005 , although average sales prices were higher due to the realiza- tion of price increases implemented during 2005 .
operating profits for 2006 improved over 2005 and 2004 levels largely due to the benefits from higher sales prices .
raw material costs for bleached board were higher than in 2005 , but manufacturing costs were more favorable due to increased productivity and reduced waste .
shorewood net sales of $ 670 million were down from $ 691 million in 2005 and $ 687 million in 2004 .
sales volumes in 2006 were down from 2005 levels due to weak demand in the home entertainment and consumer products markets , although demand was strong in the tobacco segment .
average sales prices for the year were lower than in 2005 .
operating prof- its were down significantly from both 2005 and 2004 due to the decline in sales , particularly in the higher margin home entertainment markets , higher raw material costs for bleached board and certain inventory adjustment costs .
entering 2007 , coated paperboard first-quarter sales volumes are expected to be seasonally stronger than in the fourth quarter 2006 for folding carton board and bristols .
average sales price realizations are expected to rise with a price increase announced in january .
it is anticipated that manufacturing costs will improve versus an unfavorable fourth quarter .
foodservice earnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to decline due to seasonally weaker vol- ume .
however , sales price realizations will be slightly higher , and the seasonal switch to hot cup contain- ers will have a favorable impact on product mix .
shorewood sales volumes for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to seasonally decline , but the earnings impact will be partially offset by pricing improvements and an improved product mix .
distribution our distribution business , principally represented by our xpedx business , markets a diverse array of products and supply chain services to customers in .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percent of the total commitment with an expiration of less that 1 year was subject to renewal

Pre-table text:
page 38 five years .
the amounts ultimately applied against our offset agreements are based on negotiations with the customer and generally require cash outlays that represent only a fraction of the original amount in the offset agreement .
at december 31 , 2005 , we had outstanding offset agreements totaling $ 8.4 bil- lion , primarily related to our aeronautics segment , that extend through 2015 .
to the extent we have entered into purchase obligations at december 31 , 2005 that also satisfy offset agree- ments , those amounts are included in the preceding table .
we have entered into standby letter of credit agreements and other arrangements with financial institutions and custom- ers mainly relating to advances received from customers and/or the guarantee of future performance on some of our contracts .
at december 31 , 2005 , we had outstanding letters of credit , surety bonds and guarantees , as follows : commitment expiration by period ( in millions ) commitment 1 year ( a ) years ( a ) standby letters of credit $ 2630 $ 2425 $ 171 $ 18 $ 16 .

Table:
( in millions )	commitment expiration by period total commitment	commitment expiration by period less than 1 year ( a )	commitment expiration by period 1-3 years ( a )	commitment expiration by period 3-5 years	commitment expiration by period after 5 years
standby letters of credit	$ 2630	$ 2425	$ 171	$ 18	$ 16
surety bonds	434	79	352	3	2014
guarantees	2	1	1	2014	2014
total commitments	$ 3066	$ 2505	$ 524	$ 21	$ 16

Post-table text:
( a ) approximately $ 2262 million and $ 49 million of standby letters of credit in the 201cless than 1 year 201d and 201c1-3 year 201d periods , respectively , and approximately $ 38 million of surety bonds in the 201cless than 1 year 201d period are expected to renew for additional periods until completion of the contractual obligation .
included in the table above is approximately $ 200 million representing letter of credit and surety bond amounts for which related obligations or liabilities are also recorded in the bal- ance sheet , either as reductions of inventories , as customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred , or as other liabilities .
approximately $ 2 billion of the standby letters of credit in the table above were to secure advance payments received under an f-16 contract from an international cus- tomer .
these letters of credit are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance , and the amount available will be reduced as certain events occur throughout the period of performance in accordance with the contract terms .
similar to the letters of credit for the f-16 contract , other letters of credit and surety bonds are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance .
at december 31 , 2005 , we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements as those arrangements are defined by the securities and exchange commission ( sec ) .
quantitative and qualitative disclosure of market risk our main exposure to market risk relates to interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates .
our financial instruments that are subject to interest rate risk principally include fixed- rate and floating rate long-term debt .
if interest rates were to change by plus or minus 1% ( 1 % ) , interest expense would increase or decrease by approximately $ 10 million related to our float- ing rate debt .
the estimated fair values of the corporation 2019s long-term debt instruments at december 31 , 2005 aggregated approximately $ 6.2 billion , compared with a carrying amount of approximately $ 5.0 billion .
the majority of our long-term debt obligations are not callable until maturity .
we have used interest rate swaps in the past to manage our exposure to fixed and variable interest rates ; however , at year-end 2005 , we had no such agreements in place .
we use forward foreign exchange contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates , and do so in ways that qualify for hedge accounting treatment .
these exchange contracts hedge the fluctuations in cash flows associated with firm commitments or specific anticipated transactions contracted in foreign currencies , or hedge the exposure to rate changes affecting foreign currency denomi- nated assets or liabilities .
related gains and losses on these contracts , to the extent they are effective hedges , are recog- nized in income at the same time the hedged transaction is recognized or when the hedged asset or liability is adjusted .
to the extent the hedges are ineffective , gains and losses on the contracts are recognized in the current period .
at december 31 , 2005 , the fair value of forward exchange con- tracts outstanding , as well as the amounts of gains and losses recorded during the year then ended , were not material .
we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trad- ing or speculative purposes .
recent accounting pronouncements in december 2004 , the fasb issued fas 123 ( r ) , share- based payments , which will impact our net earnings and earn- ings per share and change the classification of certain elements of the statement of cash flows .
fas 123 ( r ) requires stock options and other share-based payments made to employees to be accounted for as compensation expense and recorded at fair lockheed martin corporation management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations december 31 , 2005 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
considering the year 2014 , what is the variation between the capital expenditures on a gaap basis and the one on a non-gaap basis?

Pre-table text:
investing activities for the year ended 30 september 2014 , cash used for investing activities was $ 1638.0 , primarily capital expenditures for plant and equipment .
for the year ended 30 september 2013 , cash used for investing activities was $ 1697.0 , primarily capital expenditures for plant and equipment and acquisitions .
for the year ended 30 september 2012 , cash used for investing activities was $ 2435.2 , primarily capital expenditures for plant and equipment , acquisitions , and investments in unconsolidated affiliates .
refer to the capital expenditures section below for additional detail .
capital expenditures capital expenditures are detailed in the following table: .

Table:
	2014	2013	2012
additions to plant and equipment	$ 1684.2	$ 1524.2	$ 1521.0
acquisitions less cash acquired	2014	224.9	863.4
investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates	-2.0 ( 2.0 )	-1.3 ( 1.3 )	175.4
capital expenditures on a gaap basis	$ 1682.2	$ 1747.8	$ 2559.8
capital lease expenditures ( a )	202.4	234.9	212.2
purchase of noncontrolling interests in asubsidiary ( a )	.5	14.0	6.3
capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis	$ 1885.1	$ 1996.7	$ 2778.3

Post-table text:
( a ) we utilize a non-gaap measure in the computation of capital expenditures and include spending associated with facilities accounted for as capital leases and purchases of noncontrolling interests .
certain contracts associated with facilities that are built to provide product to a specific customer are required to be accounted for as leases , and such spending is reflected as a use of cash within cash provided by operating activities , if the arrangement qualifies as a capital lease .
additionally , the payment for subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary is accounted for as an equity transaction and will be reflected as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows .
the presentation of this non-gaap measure is intended to enhance the usefulness of information by providing a measure that our management uses internally to evaluate and manage our expenditures .
capital expenditures on a gaap basis in 2014 totaled $ 1682.2 , compared to $ 1747.8 in 2013 .
the decrease of $ 65.6 was primarily due to the acquisitions in 2013 .
additions to plant and equipment are largely in support of the merchant gases and tonnage gases businesses .
additions to plant and equipment also included support capital of a routine , ongoing nature , including expenditures for distribution equipment and facility improvements .
spending in 2014 and 2013 included plant and equipment constructed to provide oxygen for coal gasification in china , hydrogen to the global market , and renewable energy in the u.k .
in 2013 , we completed three acquisitions with an aggregate cash use , net of cash acquired , of $ 224.9 .
in the fourth quarter , we acquired an air separation unit and integrated gases liquefier in guiyang , china .
during the third quarter , we acquired epco , the largest independent u.s .
producer of liquid carbon dioxide ( co2 ) , and wcg .
in 2012 , we acquired a controlling stake in indura s.a .
for $ 690 and e.i .
dupont de nemours and co. , inc . 2019s 50% ( 50 % ) interest in our joint venture , da nanomaterials for $ 147 .
we also purchased a 25% ( 25 % ) equity interest in abdullah hashim industrial gases & equipment co .
ltd .
( ahg ) , an unconsolidated affiliate , for $ 155 .
refer to note 5 , business combinations , and note 7 , summarized financial information of equity affiliates , to the consolidated financial statements for additional details regarding the acquisitions and the investments .
capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis in 2014 totaled $ 1885.1 compared to $ 1996.7 in 2013 .
capital lease expenditures of $ 202.4 decreased by $ 32.5 , reflecting lower project spending .
2015 outlook excluding acquisitions , capital expenditures for new plant and equipment in 2015 on a gaap basis are expected to be between $ 1650 and $ 1800 , and on a non-gaap basis are expected to be between $ 1700 and $ 1900 .
the non-gaap capital expenditures include spending associated with facilities accounted for as capital leases , which are expected to be between $ 50 and $ 100 .
a majority of the total capital expenditures is expected to be for new plants .
it is anticipated that capital expenditures will be funded principally with cash from continuing operations .
in addition , we intend to continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and investments in equity affiliates .
financing activities for the year ended 2014 , cash used by financing activities was $ 504.3 primarily attributable to cash used to pay dividends of $ 627.7 , which was partially offset by proceeds from stock option exercises of $ 141.6 .
our borrowings ( short- and long-term proceeds , net of repayments ) were a net source of cash ( issuance ) of $ 1.1 and included $ 148.7 of net commercial paper and other short-term debt issuances , debt proceeds from the issuance of a .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percentage change in interest income from 2014 to 2015?

Pre-table text:
item 7a .
quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items .
from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks .
derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes .
interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations .
the majority of our debt ( approximately 89% ( 89 % ) and 91% ( 91 % ) as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates .
we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows .
the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below .
increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates .

Table:
as of december 31,	increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates	increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates
2015	$ -33.7 ( 33.7 )	$ 34.7
2014	-35.5 ( 35.5 )	36.6

Post-table text:
we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates .
we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 .
we had $ 1509.7 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2015 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities .
the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements .
during 2015 and 2014 , we had interest income of $ 22.8 and $ 27.4 , respectively .
based on our 2015 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 15.0 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2015 levels .
foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates .
since we report revenues and expenses in u.s .
dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s .
dollars ) from foreign operations .
the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2015 included the australian dollar , brazilian real , british pound sterling and euro .
based on 2015 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s .
dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2015 levels .
the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency .
assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented .
the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets .
our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk .
however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency .
assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement .
currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses .
we regularly review our foreign exchange exposures that may have a material impact on our business and from time to time use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates arising from these exposures .
we do not enter into foreign exchange contracts or other derivatives for speculative purposes. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the average high and low stock price for the second quarter of 2002?

Pre-table text:
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information .
the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated .
price range of common stock .

Table:
2002 first quarter	high $ 17.84	low $ 4.11	2001 first quarter	high $ 60.15	low $ 41.30
second quarter	9.17	3.55	second quarter	52.25	39.95
third quarter	4.61	1.56	third quarter	44.50	12.00
fourth quarter	3.57	0.95	fourth quarter	17.80	11.60

Post-table text:
holders .
as of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share .
dividends .
under the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends .
in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met .
the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries .
securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans .
see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
assuming a 5% ( 5 % ) rate of return , what would the earnings be ( in millions ) on 2008 total adjusted average assets?

Pre-table text:
jpmorgan chase & co .
/ 2008 annual report 83 credit risk capital credit risk capital is estimated separately for the wholesale business- es ( ib , cb , tss and am ) and consumer businesses ( rfs and cs ) .
credit risk capital for the overall wholesale credit portfolio is defined in terms of unexpected credit losses , both from defaults and declines in the portfolio value due to credit deterioration , measured over a one-year period at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard .
unexpected losses are losses in excess of those for which provisions for credit losses are maintained .
the capital methodology is based upon several principal drivers of credit risk : exposure at default ( or loan-equivalent amount ) , default likelihood , credit spreads , loss severity and portfolio correlation .
credit risk capital for the consumer portfolio is based upon product and other relevant risk segmentation .
actual segment level default and severity experience are used to estimate unexpected losses for a one-year horizon at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard .
statistical results for certain segments or portfolios are adjusted to ensure that capital is consistent with external bench- marks , such as subordination levels on market transactions or capital held at representative monoline competitors , where appropriate .
market risk capital the firm calculates market risk capital guided by the principle that capital should reflect the risk of loss in the value of portfolios and financial instruments caused by adverse movements in market vari- ables , such as interest and foreign exchange rates , credit spreads , securities prices and commodities prices .
daily value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) , biweekly stress-test results and other factors are used to determine appropriate capital levels .
the firm allocates market risk capital to each business segment according to a formula that weights that seg- ment 2019s var and stress-test exposures .
see market risk management on pages 111 2013116 of this annual report for more information about these market risk measures .
operational risk capital capital is allocated to the lines of business for operational risk using a risk-based capital allocation methodology which estimates opera- tional risk on a bottom-up basis .
the operational risk capital model is based upon actual losses and potential scenario-based stress losses , with adjustments to the capital calculation to reflect changes in the quality of the control environment or the use of risk-transfer prod- ucts .
the firm believes its model is consistent with the new basel ii framework .
private equity risk capital capital is allocated to privately and publicly held securities , third-party fund investments and commitments in the private equity portfolio to cover the potential loss associated with a decline in equity markets and related asset devaluations .
in addition to negative market fluctua- tions , potential losses in private equity investment portfolios can be magnified by liquidity risk .
the capital allocation for the private equity portfolio is based upon measurement of the loss experience suffered by the firm and other market participants over a prolonged period of adverse equity market conditions .
regulatory capital the board of governors of the federal reserve system ( the 201cfederal reserve 201d ) establishes capital requirements , including well-capitalized standards for the consolidated financial holding company .
the office of the comptroller of the currency ( 201cocc 201d ) establishes similar capital requirements and standards for the firm 2019s national banks , including jpmorgan chase bank , n.a. , and chase bank usa , n.a .
the federal reserve granted the firm , for a period of 18 months fol- lowing the bear stearns merger , relief up to a certain specified amount and subject to certain conditions from the federal reserve 2019s risk-based capital and leverage requirements with respect to bear stearns 2019 risk-weighted assets and other exposures acquired .
the amount of such relief is subject to reduction by one-sixth each quarter subsequent to the merger and expires on october 1 , 2009 .
the occ granted jpmorgan chase bank , n.a .
similar relief from its risk-based capital and leverage requirements .
jpmorgan chase maintained a well-capitalized position , based upon tier 1 and total capital ratios at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , as indicated in the tables below .
for more information , see note 30 on pages 212 2013213 of this annual report .
risk-based capital components and assets .

Table:
december 31 ( in millions )	2008	2007
total tier 1capital ( a )	$ 136104	$ 88746
total tier 2 capital	48616	43496
total capital	$ 184720	$ 132242
risk-weighted assets	$ 1244659	$ 1051879
total adjusted average assets	1966895	1473541

Post-table text:
( a ) the fasb has been deliberating certain amendments to both sfas 140 and fin 46r that may impact the accounting for transactions that involve qspes and vies .
based on the provisions of the current proposal and the firm 2019s interpretation of the propos- al , the firm estimates that the impact of consolidation could be up to $ 70 billion of credit card receivables , $ 40 billion of assets related to firm-sponsored multi-seller conduits , and $ 50 billion of other loans ( including residential mortgages ) ; the decrease in the tier 1 capital ratio could be approximately 80 basis points .
the ulti- mate impact could differ significantly due to the fasb 2019s continuing deliberations on the final requirements of the rule and market conditions. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the value of the rsu's granted

Pre-table text:
70| | duke realty corporation annual report 2009 the following table summarizes transactions for our rsus , excluding dividend equivalents , for 2009 : weighted average number of grant date restricted stock units rsus fair value .

Table:
restricted stock units	number of rsus	weighted average grant date fair value
rsus at december 31 2008	401375	$ 29.03
granted	1583616	$ 9.32
vested	-129352 ( 129352 )	$ 28.39
forfeited	-172033 ( 172033 )	$ 12.53
rsus at december 31 2009	1683606	$ 12.23

Post-table text:
compensation cost recognized for rsus totaled $ 7.3 million , $ 4.9 million and $ 3.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
as of december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 6.7 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested rsus granted under the plan , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.3 years .
( 14 ) financial instruments we are exposed to capital market risk , such as changes in interest rates .
in an effort to manage interest rate risk , we may enter into interest rate hedging arrangements from time to time .
we do not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes .
in november 2007 , we entered into forward starting interest swaps with notional amounts appropriate to hedge interest rates on $ 300.0 million of anticipated debt offerings in 2009 .
the forward starting swaps were appropriately designated and tested for effectiveness as cash flow hedges .
in march 2008 , we settled the forward starting swaps and made a cash payment of $ 14.6 million to the counterparties .
an effectiveness test was performed as of the settlement date and it was concluded that a highly effective cash flow hedge was still in place for the expected debt offering .
of the amount paid in settlement , approximately $ 700000 was immediately reclassified to interest expense , as the result of partial ineffectiveness calculated at the settlement date .
the net amount of $ 13.9 million was recorded in other comprehensive income ( 201coci 201d ) and is being recognized through interest expense over the life of the hedged debt offering , which took place in may 2008 .
the remaining unamortized amount included as a reduction to accumulated oci as of december 31 , 2009 is $ 9.3 million .
in august 2005 , we entered into $ 300.0 million of cash flow hedges through forward starting interest rate swaps to hedge interest rates on $ 300.0 million of anticipated debt offerings in 2007 .
the swaps qualified for hedge accounting , with any changes in fair value recorded in oci .
in conjunction with the september 2007 issuance of $ 300.0 million of senior unsecured notes , we terminated these cash flow hedges as designated .
the settlement amount received of $ 10.7 million is being recognized to earnings through a reduction of interest expense over the term of the hedged cash flows .
the remaining unamortized amount included as an increase to accumulated oci as of december 31 , 2009 is $ 8.2 million .
the ineffective portion of the hedge was insignificant .
the effectiveness of our hedges is evaluated throughout their lives using the hypothetical derivative method under which the change in fair value of the actual swap designated as the hedging instrument is compared to the change in fair value of a hypothetical swap .
we had no material interest rate derivatives , when considering both fair value and notional amount , at december 31 , 2009. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage total return for delphi automotive plc for the five years ended december 31 2014?\\n

Pre-table text:
stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends .
fiscal year ending december 31 , 2014 .
( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lkq corp. , lear corp. , meritor inc. , remy international inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , trw automotive holdings corp. , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc .
company index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

Table:
company index	november 17 2011	december 31 2011	december 31 2012	december 31 2013	december 31 2014
delphi automotive plc ( 1 )	$ 100.00	$ 100.98	$ 179.33	$ 285.81	$ 350.82
s&p 500 ( 2 )	100.00	100.80	116.93	154.80	175.99
automotive supplier peer group ( 3 )	100.00	89.27	110.41	166.46	178.05

Post-table text:
dividends on february 26 , 2013 , the board of directors approved the initiation of dividend payments on the company's ordinary shares .
the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.17 per ordinary share that was paid in each quarter of 2013 .
in january 2014 , the board of directors increased the quarterly dividend rate to $ 0.25 per ordinary share , which was paid in each quarter of 2014 .
in addition , in january 2015 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.25 per ordinary share , payable on february 27 , 2015 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 18 , 2015. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage change in net income ( loss ) on a pro forma basis between 2006 and 2007?

Pre-table text:
goodwill goodwill represents the excess of the solexa purchase price over the sum of the amounts assigned to assets acquired less liabilities assumed .
the company believes that the acquisition of solexa will produce the following significant benefits : 2022 increased market presence and opportunities .
the combination of the company and solexa should increase the combined company 2019s market presence and opportunities for growth in revenue , earnings and stockholder return .
the company believes that the solexa technology is highly complementary to the company 2019s own portfolio of products and services and will enhance the company 2019s capabilities to service its existing customers , as well as accelerate the develop- ment of additional technologies , products and services .
the company believes that integrating solexa 2019s capabilities with the company 2019s technologies will better position the company to address the emerging biomarker research and development and in-vitro and molecular diag- nostic markets .
the company began to recognize revenue from products shipped as a result of this acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 .
2022 operating efficiencies .
the combination of the company and solexa provides the opportunity for potential economies of scale and cost savings .
the company believes that these primary factors support the amount of goodwill recognized as a result of the purchase price paid for solexa , in relation to other acquired tangible and intangible assets , including in-process research and development .
the following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of the company 2019s operations for the specified reporting periods as though the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of that period ( in thousands , except per share data ) : year ended december 30 , year ended december 31 .

Table:
	year ended december 30 2007	year ended december 31 2006
revenue	$ 366854	$ 187103
net income ( loss )	$ 17388	$ -38957 ( 38957 )
net income ( loss ) per share basic	$ 0.32	$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )
net income ( loss ) per share diluted	$ 0.29	$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )

Post-table text:
the pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations had the acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented , or the results that may occur in the future .
the pro forma results exclude the $ 303.4 million non-cash acquired ipr&d charge recorded upon the closing of the acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 .
investment in solexa on november 12 , 2006 , the company entered into a definitive securities purchase agreement with solexa in which the company invested approximately $ 50 million in solexa in exchange for 5154639 newly issued shares of solexa common stock in conjunction with the merger of the two companies .
this investment was valued at $ 67.8 million as of december 31 , 2006 , which represented a market value of $ 13.15 per share of solexa common stock .
this investment was eliminated as part of the company 2019s purchase accounting upon the closing of the merger on january 26 , 2007 .
illumina , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percent did the balance increase between the beginning of 2010 and the end of 2012?

Pre-table text:
19 .
income taxes ( continued ) capital loss carryforwards of $ 69 million and $ 90 million , which were acquired in the bgi transaction and will expire on or before 2013 .
at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had $ 95 million and $ 95 million of valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets , respectively , recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition .
the year- over-year increase in the valuation allowance primarily related to certain foreign deferred income tax assets .
goodwill recorded in connection with the quellos transaction has been reduced during the period by the amount of tax benefit realized from tax-deductible goodwill .
see note 9 , goodwill , for further discussion .
current income taxes are recorded net in the consolidated statements of financial condition when related to the same tax jurisdiction .
as of december 31 , 2012 , the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $ 102 million and $ 121 million , respectively , recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities , respectively .
as of december 31 , 2011 , the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $ 108 million and $ 102 million , respectively , recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities , respectively .
the company does not provide deferred taxes on the excess of the financial reporting over tax basis on its investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration .
the excess totaled $ 2125 million and $ 1516 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .
the determination of the additional deferred income taxes on the excess has not been provided because it is not practicable due to the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation .
the following tabular reconciliation presents the total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits : year ended december 31 , ( dollar amounts in millions ) 2012 2011 2010 .

Table:
( dollar amounts in millions )	year ended december 31 , 2012	year ended december 31 , 2011	year ended december 31 , 2010
balance at january 1	$ 349	$ 307	$ 285
additions for tax positions of prior years	4	22	10
reductions for tax positions of prior years	-1 ( 1 )	-1 ( 1 )	-17 ( 17 )
additions based on tax positions related to current year	69	46	35
lapse of statute of limitations	2014	2014	-8 ( 8 )
settlements	-29 ( 29 )	-25 ( 25 )	-2 ( 2 )
positions assumed in acquisitions	12	2014	4
balance at december 31	$ 404	$ 349	$ 307

Post-table text:
included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , are $ 250 million , $ 226 million and $ 194 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate .
the company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expense .
related to the unrecognized tax benefits noted above , the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 3 million during 2012 and in total , as of december 31 , 2012 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 69 million .
the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 10 million during 2011 and in total , as of december 31 , 2011 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 66 million .
the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 8 million during 2010 and in total , as of december 31 , 2010 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 56 million .
pursuant to the amended and restated stock purchase agreement , the company has been indemnified by barclays for $ 73 million and guggenheim for $ 6 million of unrecognized tax benefits .
blackrock is subject to u.s .
federal income tax , state and local income tax , and foreign income tax in multiple jurisdictions .
tax years after 2007 remain open to u.s .
federal income tax examination , tax years after 2005 remain open to state and local income tax examination , and tax years after 2006 remain open to income tax examination in the united kingdom .
with few exceptions , as of december 31 , 2012 , the company is no longer subject to u.s .
federal , state , local or foreign examinations by tax authorities for years before 2006 .
the internal revenue service ( 201cirs 201d ) completed its examination of blackrock 2019s 2006 and 2007 tax years in march 2011 .
in november 2011 , the irs commenced its examination of blackrock 2019s 2008 and 2009 tax years , and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined , it is not expected to be material .
in july 2011 , the irs commenced its federal income tax audit of the bgi group , which blackrock acquired in december 2009 .
the tax years under examination are 2007 through december 1 , 2009 , and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined , it is not expected to be material .
the company is currently under audit in several state and local jurisdictions .
the significant state and local income tax examinations are in california for tax years 2004 through 2006 , new york city for tax years 2007 through 2008 , and new jersey for tax years 2003 through 2009 .
no state and local income tax audits cover years earlier than 2007 except for california , new jersey and new york city .
no state and local income tax audits are expected to result in an assessment material to the consolidated financial statements. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage of the total purchase price net of cash acquired is ipr&d ?

Pre-table text:
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 .
acquisitions ( continued ) 12 months after the acquisition date will be disbursed to harpoon medical , inc . 2019s former shareholders .
acquisition-related costs of $ 0.4 million were recorded in 201cselling , general , and administrative expenses 201d during the year ended december 31 , 2017 .
harpoon medical , inc .
is a medical technology company pioneering beating-heart repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation .
the company plans to add this technology to its portfolio of mitral and tricuspid repair products .
the acquisition was accounted for as a business combination .
tangible and intangible assets acquired were recorded based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date .
the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired was recorded to goodwill .
the following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed ( in millions ) : .

Table:
current assets	$ 3.6
property and equipment net	0.3
goodwill	142.1
ipr&d	53.1
other assets	0.1
current liabilities assumed	-0.8 ( 0.8 )
deferred income taxes	-12.7 ( 12.7 )
total purchase price	185.7
less : cash acquired	-3.5 ( 3.5 )
total purchase price net of cash acquired	$ 182.2

Post-table text:
goodwill includes expected synergies and other benefits the company believes will result from the acquisition .
goodwill was assigned to the company 2019s united states segment and is not deductible for tax purposes .
ipr&d has been capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and will be assessed for impairment in subsequent periods .
the fair value of the ipr&d was determined using the income approach .
this approach determines fair value based on cash flow projections which are discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate of return .
the discount rates used to determine the fair value of the ipr&d ranged from 18.0% ( 18.0 % ) to 19.0% ( 19.0 % ) .
completion of successful design developments , bench testing , pre-clinical studies and human clinical studies are required prior to selling any product .
the risks and uncertainties associated with completing development within a reasonable period of time include those related to the design , development , and manufacturability of the product , the success of pre-clinical and clinical studies , and the timing of regulatory approvals .
the valuation assumed $ 41.4 million of additional research and development expenditures would be incurred prior to the date of product introduction .
in the valuation , net cash inflows were modeled to commence in europe in 2018 , and in the united states and japan in 2022 .
upon completion of development , the underlying research and development asset will be amortized over its estimated useful life .
the results of operations for harpoon medical , inc .
have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition .
pro forma results have not been presented as the results of harpoon medical , inc .
are not material in relation to the consolidated financial statements of the company .
valtech cardio ltd .
on november 26 , 2016 , the company entered into an agreement and plan of merger to acquire valtech cardio ltd .
( 201cvaltech 201d ) for approximately $ 340.0 million , subject to certain adjustments , with the potential for up to an additional $ 350.0 million in pre-specified milestone-driven payments over the next 10 years .
the .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
tier 2 capital is what percent of total capital for 2008?

Pre-table text:
jpmorgan chase & co .
/ 2008 annual report 83 credit risk capital credit risk capital is estimated separately for the wholesale business- es ( ib , cb , tss and am ) and consumer businesses ( rfs and cs ) .
credit risk capital for the overall wholesale credit portfolio is defined in terms of unexpected credit losses , both from defaults and declines in the portfolio value due to credit deterioration , measured over a one-year period at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard .
unexpected losses are losses in excess of those for which provisions for credit losses are maintained .
the capital methodology is based upon several principal drivers of credit risk : exposure at default ( or loan-equivalent amount ) , default likelihood , credit spreads , loss severity and portfolio correlation .
credit risk capital for the consumer portfolio is based upon product and other relevant risk segmentation .
actual segment level default and severity experience are used to estimate unexpected losses for a one-year horizon at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard .
statistical results for certain segments or portfolios are adjusted to ensure that capital is consistent with external bench- marks , such as subordination levels on market transactions or capital held at representative monoline competitors , where appropriate .
market risk capital the firm calculates market risk capital guided by the principle that capital should reflect the risk of loss in the value of portfolios and financial instruments caused by adverse movements in market vari- ables , such as interest and foreign exchange rates , credit spreads , securities prices and commodities prices .
daily value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) , biweekly stress-test results and other factors are used to determine appropriate capital levels .
the firm allocates market risk capital to each business segment according to a formula that weights that seg- ment 2019s var and stress-test exposures .
see market risk management on pages 111 2013116 of this annual report for more information about these market risk measures .
operational risk capital capital is allocated to the lines of business for operational risk using a risk-based capital allocation methodology which estimates opera- tional risk on a bottom-up basis .
the operational risk capital model is based upon actual losses and potential scenario-based stress losses , with adjustments to the capital calculation to reflect changes in the quality of the control environment or the use of risk-transfer prod- ucts .
the firm believes its model is consistent with the new basel ii framework .
private equity risk capital capital is allocated to privately and publicly held securities , third-party fund investments and commitments in the private equity portfolio to cover the potential loss associated with a decline in equity markets and related asset devaluations .
in addition to negative market fluctua- tions , potential losses in private equity investment portfolios can be magnified by liquidity risk .
the capital allocation for the private equity portfolio is based upon measurement of the loss experience suffered by the firm and other market participants over a prolonged period of adverse equity market conditions .
regulatory capital the board of governors of the federal reserve system ( the 201cfederal reserve 201d ) establishes capital requirements , including well-capitalized standards for the consolidated financial holding company .
the office of the comptroller of the currency ( 201cocc 201d ) establishes similar capital requirements and standards for the firm 2019s national banks , including jpmorgan chase bank , n.a. , and chase bank usa , n.a .
the federal reserve granted the firm , for a period of 18 months fol- lowing the bear stearns merger , relief up to a certain specified amount and subject to certain conditions from the federal reserve 2019s risk-based capital and leverage requirements with respect to bear stearns 2019 risk-weighted assets and other exposures acquired .
the amount of such relief is subject to reduction by one-sixth each quarter subsequent to the merger and expires on october 1 , 2009 .
the occ granted jpmorgan chase bank , n.a .
similar relief from its risk-based capital and leverage requirements .
jpmorgan chase maintained a well-capitalized position , based upon tier 1 and total capital ratios at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , as indicated in the tables below .
for more information , see note 30 on pages 212 2013213 of this annual report .
risk-based capital components and assets .

Table:
december 31 ( in millions )	2008	2007
total tier 1capital ( a )	$ 136104	$ 88746
total tier 2 capital	48616	43496
total capital	$ 184720	$ 132242
risk-weighted assets	$ 1244659	$ 1051879
total adjusted average assets	1966895	1473541

Post-table text:
( a ) the fasb has been deliberating certain amendments to both sfas 140 and fin 46r that may impact the accounting for transactions that involve qspes and vies .
based on the provisions of the current proposal and the firm 2019s interpretation of the propos- al , the firm estimates that the impact of consolidation could be up to $ 70 billion of credit card receivables , $ 40 billion of assets related to firm-sponsored multi-seller conduits , and $ 50 billion of other loans ( including residential mortgages ) ; the decrease in the tier 1 capital ratio could be approximately 80 basis points .
the ulti- mate impact could differ significantly due to the fasb 2019s continuing deliberations on the final requirements of the rule and market conditions. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
considering the fair market value of plan assets in 2018 , what is its estimated return for 10 years?

Pre-table text:
income tax liabilities tax liabilities related to unrecognized tax benefits as of 30 september 2018 were $ 233.6 .
these tax liabilities were excluded from the contractual obligations table as it is impractical to determine a cash impact by year given that payments will vary according to changes in tax laws , tax rates , and our operating results .
in addition , there are uncertainties in timing of the effective settlement of our uncertain tax positions with respective taxing authorities .
however , the contractual obligations table above includes our accrued liability of approximately $ 184 for deemed repatriation tax that is payable over eight years related to the tax act .
refer to note 22 , income taxes , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .
obligation for future contribution to an equity affiliate on 19 april 2015 , a joint venture between air products and acwa holding entered into a 20-year oxygen and nitrogen supply agreement to supply saudi aramco 2019s oil refinery and power plant being built in jazan , saudi arabia .
air products owns 25% ( 25 % ) of the joint venture and guarantees the repayment of its share of an equity bridge loan .
in total , we expect to invest approximately $ 100 in this joint venture .
as of 30 september 2018 , we recorded a noncurrent liability of $ 94.4 for our obligation to make future equity contributions in 2020 based on our proportionate share of the advances received by the joint venture under the loan .
expected investment in joint venture on 12 august 2018 , air products entered an agreement to form a gasification/power joint venture ( "jv" ) with saudi aramco and acwa in jazan , saudi arabia .
air products will own at least 55% ( 55 % ) of the jv , with saudi aramco and acwa power owning the balance .
the jv will purchase the gasification assets , power block , and the associated utilities from saudi aramco for approximately $ 8 billion .
our expected investment has been excluded from the contractual obligations table above pending closing , which is currently expected in fiscal year 2020 .
the jv will own and operate the facility under a 25-year contract for a fixed monthly fee .
saudi aramco will supply feedstock to the jv , and the jv will produce power , hydrogen and other utilities for saudi aramco .
pension benefits the company and certain of its subsidiaries sponsor defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution plans that cover a substantial portion of its worldwide employees .
the principal defined benefit pension plans are the u.s .
salaried pension plan and the u.k .
pension plan .
these plans were closed to new participants in 2005 , after which defined contribution plans were offered to new employees .
the shift to defined contribution plans is expected to continue to reduce volatility of both plan expense and contributions .
the fair market value of plan assets for our defined benefit pension plans as of the 30 september 2018 measurement date decreased to $ 4273.1 from $ 4409.2 at the end of fiscal year 2017 .
the projected benefit obligation for these plans was $ 4583.3 and $ 5107.2 at the end of fiscal years 2018 and 2017 , respectively .
the net unfunded liability decreased $ 387.8 from $ 698.0 to $ 310.2 , primarily due to higher discount rates and favorable asset experience .
refer to note 16 , retirement benefits , to the consolidated financial statements for comprehensive and detailed disclosures on our postretirement benefits .
pension expense .

Table:
	2018	2017	2016
pension expense 2013 continuing operations	$ 91.8	$ 72.0	$ 55.8
settlements termination benefits and curtailments ( included above )	48.9	15.0	6.0
weighted average discount rate 2013 service cost	3.2% ( 3.2 % )	2.9% ( 2.9 % )	4.1% ( 4.1 % )
weighted average discount rate 2013 interest cost	2.9% ( 2.9 % )	2.5% ( 2.5 % )	3.4% ( 3.4 % )
weighted average expected rate of return on plan assets	6.9% ( 6.9 % )	7.4% ( 7.4 % )	7.5% ( 7.5 % )
weighted average expected rate of compensation increase	3.5% ( 3.5 % )	3.5% ( 3.5 % )	3.5% ( 3.5 % )

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in 2002 what was the ratio of the net mw in operation to the generation in gwh for the year

Pre-table text:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances .
the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 .
the refund was made in december 2001 .
2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s .
utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas .
non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively .
the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 .
following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: .

Table:
	2002	2001	2000
net mw in operation at december 31	3955	3445	2475
generation in gwh for the year	29953	22614	7171
capacity factor for the year	93% ( 93 % )	93% ( 93 % )	94% ( 94 % )

Post-table text:
2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
for 2013 , what was the total in millions of the combined interest only product and principal and interest product?

Pre-table text:
generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term .
during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest .
based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2011 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end .
home equity lines of credit - draw period end dates in millions interest only product principal and interest product .

Table:
in millions	interest only product	principal and interest product
2012	$ 904	$ 266
2013	1211	331
2014	2043	598
2015	1988	820
2016 and thereafter	6961	5601
total ( a )	$ 13107	$ 7616

Post-table text:
( a ) includes approximately $ 306 million , $ 44 million , $ 60 million , $ 100 million , and $ 246 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , and 2016 and thereafter , respectively .
we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments .
based upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2011 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 4.32% ( 4.32 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.57% ( 5.57 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due .
generally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated .
at that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr .
see note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information .
loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate .
initially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program .
if a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program .
our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal .
temporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs .
further , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs .
additional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .
a temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to the original loan terms as of a specific date or the occurrence of an event , such as a failure to pay in accordance with the terms of the modification .
typically , these modifications are for a period of up to 24 months after which the interest rate reverts to the original loan rate .
a permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed .
permanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs .
for consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance .
examples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment .
permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made .
residential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months .
we also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses .
the following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months and twelve months after the modification date .
78 the pnc financial services group , inc .
2013 form 10-k .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in 2011 , did the company distribute more to shareholders than debtholders?

Pre-table text:
are allocated using appropriate statistical bases .
total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.2 billion for 2011 , $ 2.0 billion for 2010 , and $ 1.9 billion for 2009 .
assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .
amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .
12 .
accounts payable and other current liabilities dec .
31 , dec .
31 , millions 2011 2010 .

Table:
millions	dec . 31 2011	dec . 31 2010
accounts payable	$ 819	$ 677
income and other taxes	482	337
accrued wages and vacation	363	357
dividends payable	284	183
accrued casualty costs	249	325
interest payable	197	200
equipment rents payable	90	86
other	624	548
total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities	$ 3108	$ 2713

Post-table text:
13 .
financial instruments strategy and risk 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances for other than trading purposes to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices .
we are not a party to leveraged derivatives and , by policy , do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes .
derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged , both at inception and throughout the hedged period .
we formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception , as well as our risk- management objectives , strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions , and method of assessing hedge effectiveness .
changes in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings .
we may use swaps , collars , futures , and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices ; however , the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable interest rate and fuel price movements .
market and credit risk 2013 we address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item .
we manage credit risk related to derivative financial instruments , which is minimal , by requiring high credit standards for counterparties and periodic settlements .
at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , we were not required to provide collateral , nor had we received collateral , relating to our hedging activities .
determination of fair value 2013 we determine the fair values of our derivative financial instrument positions based upon current fair values as quoted by recognized dealers or the present value of expected future cash flows .
interest rate fair value hedges 2013 we manage our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by adjusting the proportion of fixed and floating rate debt instruments within our debt portfolio over a given period .
we generally manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt through the issuance of targeted amounts of each as debt matures or as we require incremental borrowings .
we employ derivatives , primarily swaps , as one of the tools to obtain the targeted mix .
in addition , we also obtain flexibility in managing interest costs and the interest rate mix within our debt portfolio by evaluating the issuance of and managing outstanding callable fixed-rate debt securities .
swaps allow us to convert debt from fixed rates to variable rates and thereby hedge the risk of changes in the debt 2019s fair value attributable to the changes in interest rates .
we account for swaps as fair value .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the ratio of the deffered tax assets for the state income tax credit carry-forwards to the net operating loss carry-forward

Pre-table text:
as of december 31 , 2017 , the company had gross state income tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $ 20 million , which expire from 2018 through 2020 .
a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 16 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established related to these state income tax credit carry-forwards , with a valuation allowance of $ 7 million against such deferred tax asset as of december 31 , 2017 .
the company had a gross state net operating loss carry-forward of $ 39 million , which expires in 2027 .
a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 3 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established for the net operating loss carry-forward , with a full valuation allowance as of december 31 , 2017 .
other state and foreign net operating loss carry-forwards are separately and cumulatively immaterial to the company 2019s deferred tax balances and expire between 2026 and 2036 .
14 .
debt long-term debt consisted of the following: .

Table:
( $ in millions )	december 31 2017	december 31 2016
senior notes due december 15 2021 5.000% ( 5.000 % )	2014	600
senior notes due november 15 2025 5.000% ( 5.000 % )	600	600
senior notes due december 1 2027 3.483% ( 3.483 % )	600	2014
mississippi economic development revenue bonds due may 1 2024 7.81% ( 7.81 % )	84	84
gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds due december 1 2028 4.55% ( 4.55 % )	21	21
less unamortized debt issuance costs	-26 ( 26 )	-27 ( 27 )
total long-term debt	1279	1278

Post-table text:
credit facility - in november 2017 , the company terminated its second amended and restated credit agreement and entered into a new credit agreement ( the "credit facility" ) with third-party lenders .
the credit facility includes a revolving credit facility of $ 1250 million , which may be drawn upon during a period of five years from november 22 , 2017 .
the revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility of $ 500 million .
the revolving credit facility has a variable interest rate on outstanding borrowings based on the london interbank offered rate ( "libor" ) plus a spread based upon the company's credit rating , which may vary between 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) and 1.500% ( 1.500 % ) .
the revolving credit facility also has a commitment fee rate on the unutilized balance based on the company 2019s leverage ratio .
the commitment fee rate as of december 31 , 2017 was 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) and may vary between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.30% ( 0.30 % ) .
the credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants , as well as a financial covenant based on a maximum total leverage ratio .
each of the company's existing and future material wholly owned domestic subsidiaries , except those that are specifically designated as unrestricted subsidiaries , are and will be guarantors under the credit facility .
in july 2015 , the company used cash on hand to repay all amounts outstanding under a prior credit facility , including $ 345 million in principal amount of outstanding term loans .
as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 15 million in letters of credit were issued but undrawn , and the remaining $ 1235 million of the revolving credit facility was unutilized .
the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with its credit facilities of $ 11 million and $ 8 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .
senior notes - in december 2017 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes with registration rights due december 2027 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2017 redemption described below .
in november 2015 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due november 2025 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2015 tender offer and redemption described below .
interest on the company's senior notes is payable semi-annually .
the terms of the 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) and 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes limit the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create liens , enter into sale and leaseback transactions , sell assets , and effect consolidations or mergers .
the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes of $ 15 million and $ 19 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}