[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage of major facilities by square footage are owned as of december 28 , 2013?

Pre-table text:
item 1b .
unresolved staff comments not applicable .
item 2 .
properties as of december 28 , 2013 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 29.9 16.7 46.6 leased facilities2 2.3 6.0 8.3 .

Table:
( square feet in millions )	unitedstates	othercountries	total
owned facilities1	29.9	16.7	46.6
leased facilities2	2.3	6.0	8.3
total facilities	32.2	22.7	54.9

Post-table text:
1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 .
2 leases expire on varying dates through 2028 and generally include renewals at our option .
our principal executive offices are located in the u.s .
and a significant amount of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s .
in addition to our current facilities , we are building a development fabrication facility in oregon which began r&d start-up in 2013 .
we expect that this new facility will allow us to widen our process technology lead .
we also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 , which is currently not in use and is not being depreciated .
we recently announced that we plan to delay equipment installation in this building and leverage existing fabrication facilities , reserving this new facility for additional capacity and future technologies .
outside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in israel , china , and ireland .
our fabrication facility in ireland is currently transitioning to a newer process technology node , with manufacturing expected to recommence in 2015 .
our assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , costa rica , and vietnam .
in addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers .
we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it .
we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment .
for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 27 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .
item 3 .
legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 26 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .
item 4 .
mine safety disclosures not applicable .
table of contents .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . for the five years ended 12/29/2012?

Pre-table text:
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .
nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .
all rights reserved. .

Table:
	12/29/2007	1/3/2009	1/2/2010	1/1/2011	12/31/2011	12/29/2012
cadence design systems inc .	100.00	22.55	35.17	48.50	61.07	78.92
nasdaq composite	100.00	59.03	82.25	97.32	98.63	110.78
s&p 400 information technology	100.00	54.60	82.76	108.11	95.48	109.88

Post-table text:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what are the total amount of net tangible assets obtained through the acquisition?

Pre-table text:
the estimated acquisition-date fair values of major classes of assets acquired and liabilities assumed , including a reconciliation to the total purchase consideration , are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
cash	$ 45826
customer-related intangible assets	42721
acquired technology	27954
trade name	2901
other assets	2337
deferred income tax assets ( liabilities )	-9788 ( 9788 )
other liabilities	-49797 ( 49797 )
total identifiable net assets	62154
goodwill	203828
total purchase consideration	$ 265982

Post-table text:
goodwill of $ 203.8 million arising from the acquisition , included in the asia-pacific segment , was attributable to expected growth opportunities in australia and new zealand , as well as growth opportunities and operating synergies in integrated payments in our existing asia-pacific and north america markets .
goodwill associated with this acquisition is not deductible for income tax purposes .
the customer-related intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 15 years .
the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 15 years .
the trade name has an estimated amortization period of 5 years .
note 3 2014 settlement processing assets and obligations funds settlement refers to the process of transferring funds for sales and credits between card issuers and merchants .
for transactions processed on our systems , we use our internal network to provide funding instructions to financial institutions that in turn fund the merchants .
we process funds settlement under two models , a sponsorship model and a direct membership model .
under the sponsorship model , we are designated as a merchant service provider by mastercard and an independent sales organization by visa , which means that member clearing banks ( 201cmember 201d ) sponsor us and require our adherence to the standards of the payment networks .
in certain markets , we have sponsorship or depository and clearing agreements with financial institution sponsors .
these agreements allow us to route transactions under the members 2019 control and identification numbers to clear credit card transactions through mastercard and visa .
in this model , the standards of the payment networks restrict us from performing funds settlement or accessing merchant settlement funds , and , instead , require that these funds be in the possession of the member until the merchant is funded .
under the direct membership model , we are members in various payment networks , allowing us to process and fund transactions without third-party sponsorship .
in this model , we route and clear transactions directly through the card brand 2019s network and are not restricted from performing funds settlement .
otherwise , we process these transactions similarly to how we process transactions in the sponsorship model .
we are required to adhere to the standards of the payment networks in which we are direct members .
we maintain relationships with financial institutions , which may also serve as our member sponsors for other card brands or in other markets , to assist with funds settlement .
timing differences , interchange fees , merchant reserves and exception items cause differences between the amount received from the payment networks and the amount funded to the merchants .
these intermediary balances arising in our settlement process for direct merchants are reflected as settlement processing assets and obligations on our consolidated balance sheets .
settlement processing assets and obligations include the components outlined below : 2022 interchange reimbursement .
our receivable from merchants for the portion of the discount fee related to reimbursement of the interchange fee .
global payments inc .
| 2017 form 10-k annual report 2013 77 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage change in the amortized cost in 2009

Pre-table text:
impairment net unrealized losses on securities available for sale were as follows as of december 31: .

Table:
( in millions )	2009	2008
fair value	$ 72699	$ 54163
amortized cost	74843	60786
net unrealized loss pre-tax	$ -2144 ( 2144 )	$ -6623 ( 6623 )
net unrealized loss after-tax	$ -1316 ( 1316 )	$ -4057 ( 4057 )

Post-table text:
the above net unrealized loss amounts at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 excluded the remaining net unrealized loss of $ 1.01 billion , or $ 635 million after-tax , and $ 2.27 billion , or $ 1.39 billion after- tax , respectively , related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .
these after-tax amounts are recorded in other comprehensive income .
the decline in the remaining after-tax unrealized loss amounts related to transferred securities resulted from amortization and from the recognition of losses from other-than-temporary impairment on certain of the securities .
we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .
to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .
the credit component is recognized in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that management does not intend to sell the security ( see note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8 ) .
the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation of economic and security- specific factors , which are more fully described in note 3 .
such factors are based upon estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .
to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular the credit component that would be recognized in our consolidated statement of income .
national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national hpi , have declined to date approximately 30% ( 30 % ) peak-to-current .
management currently estimates that national housing prices will continue to decline and bottom out during the second half of 2010 , consistent with a peak-to-trough housing price decline of approximately 37% ( 37 % ) .
as an indication of the sensitivity of our portfolio with respect to our more significant assumptions underlying our assessment of impairment , if we were to increase our default estimates to 110% ( 110 % ) of management 2019s current expectations with a corresponding slowing of prepayment speeds to 90% ( 90 % ) of management 2019s current expectations , credit-related other-than-temporary impairment could increase by approximately $ 120 million to $ 125 million , which impairment would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .
excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining securities and the resulting net unrealized losses to be temporary and not the result of any material changes in the credit characteristics of the securities .
additional information about our assessment of impairment is provided in note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the long-term retail/hnw in emea as a percentage of the total long-term retail/hnw?

Pre-table text:
retail and hnw investors ( excluding investments in ishares ) retail / hnw long-term aum by asset class & client region december 31 , 2012 ( dollar amounts in millions ) americas emea asia-pacific total .

Table:
( dollar amounts in millions )	americas	emea	asia-pacific	total
equity	$ 94805	$ 53140	$ 16803	$ 164748
fixed income	121640	11444	5341	138425
multi-asset class	76714	9538	4374	90626
alternatives	4865	3577	1243	9685
long-term retail/hnw	$ 298024	$ 77699	$ 27761	$ 403484

Post-table text:
blackrock serves retail and hnw investors globally through separate accounts , open-end and closed-end funds , unit trusts and private investment funds .
at december 31 , 2012 , long-term assets managed for retail and hnw investors totaled $ 403.5 billion , up 11% ( 11 % ) , or $ 40.1 billion , versus year-end 2011 .
during the year , net inflows of $ 11.6 billion in long-term products were augmented by market valuation improvements of $ 28.3 billion .
retail and hnw investors are served principally through intermediaries , including broker-dealers , banks , trust companies , insurance companies and independent financial advisors .
clients invest primarily in mutual funds , which totaled $ 322.4 billion , or 80% ( 80 % ) , of retail and hnw long-term aum at year-end , with the remainder invested in private investment funds and separately managed accounts .
the product mix is well diversified , with 41% ( 41 % ) of long-term aum in equities , 34% ( 34 % ) in fixed income , 23% ( 23 % ) in multi-asset class and 2% ( 2 % ) in alternatives .
the vast majority ( 98% ( 98 % ) ) of long-term aum is invested in active products , although this is partially inflated by the fact that ishares is shown separately , since we do not identify all of the underlying investors .
the client base is also diversified geographically , with 74% ( 74 % ) of long-term aum managed for investors based in the americas , 19% ( 19 % ) in emea and 7% ( 7 % ) in asia-pacific at year- end 2012 .
2022 u.s .
retail and hnw long-term inflows of $ 9.8 billion were driven by strong demand for u.s .
sector- specialty and municipal fixed income mutual fund offerings and income-oriented equity .
in 2012 , we broadened the distribution of alternatives funds to bring higher alpha , institutional quality hedge fund products to retail investors as three mutual funds launched at the end of 2011 gained traction and acceptance , raising close to $ 0.8 billion of assets .
u.s .
retail alternatives aum crossed the $ 5.0 billion threshold in 2012 .
the year also included the launch of the blackrock municipal target term trust ( 201cbtt 201d ) with $ 2.1 billion of assets raised , making it the largest municipal fund ever launched and the largest overall industry offering since 2007 .
we are the leading u.s .
manager by aum of separately managed accounts , the second largest closed-end fund manager and a top-ten manager of long-term open-end mutual funds2 .
2022 international retail net inflows of $ 1.8 billion in 2012 were driven by fixed income net inflows of $ 5.2 billion .
investor demand remained distinctly risk-off in 2012 , largely driven by macro political and economic instability and continued trends toward de-risking .
equity net outflows of $ 2.9 billion were predominantly from sector-specific and regional and country- specific equity strategies due to uncertainty in european markets .
our international retail and hnw offerings include our luxembourg cross-border fund families , blackrock global funds ( 201cbgf 201d ) , blackrock strategic funds with $ 83.1 billion and $ 2.4 billion of aum at year-end 2012 , respectively , and a range of retail funds in the united kingdom .
bgf contained 67 funds registered in 35 jurisdictions at year-end 2012 .
over 60% ( 60 % ) of the funds were rated by s&p .
in 2012 , we were ranked as the third largest cross border fund provider3 .
in the united kingdom , we ranked among the five largest fund managers3 , and are known for our innovative product offerings , especially within natural resources , european equity , asian equity and equity income .
global clientele our footprint in each of these regions reflects strong relationships with intermediaries and an established ability to deliver our global investment expertise in funds and other products tailored to local regulations and requirements .
2 simfund , cerulli 3 lipper feri .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the ratio of the 2017 total long term debt to 2016

Pre-table text:
as of december 31 , 2017 , the company had gross state income tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $ 20 million , which expire from 2018 through 2020 .
a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 16 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established related to these state income tax credit carry-forwards , with a valuation allowance of $ 7 million against such deferred tax asset as of december 31 , 2017 .
the company had a gross state net operating loss carry-forward of $ 39 million , which expires in 2027 .
a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 3 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established for the net operating loss carry-forward , with a full valuation allowance as of december 31 , 2017 .
other state and foreign net operating loss carry-forwards are separately and cumulatively immaterial to the company 2019s deferred tax balances and expire between 2026 and 2036 .
14 .
debt long-term debt consisted of the following: .

Table:
( $ in millions )	december 31 2017	december 31 2016
senior notes due december 15 2021 5.000% ( 5.000 % )	2014	600
senior notes due november 15 2025 5.000% ( 5.000 % )	600	600
senior notes due december 1 2027 3.483% ( 3.483 % )	600	2014
mississippi economic development revenue bonds due may 1 2024 7.81% ( 7.81 % )	84	84
gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds due december 1 2028 4.55% ( 4.55 % )	21	21
less unamortized debt issuance costs	-26 ( 26 )	-27 ( 27 )
total long-term debt	1279	1278

Post-table text:
credit facility - in november 2017 , the company terminated its second amended and restated credit agreement and entered into a new credit agreement ( the "credit facility" ) with third-party lenders .
the credit facility includes a revolving credit facility of $ 1250 million , which may be drawn upon during a period of five years from november 22 , 2017 .
the revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility of $ 500 million .
the revolving credit facility has a variable interest rate on outstanding borrowings based on the london interbank offered rate ( "libor" ) plus a spread based upon the company's credit rating , which may vary between 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) and 1.500% ( 1.500 % ) .
the revolving credit facility also has a commitment fee rate on the unutilized balance based on the company 2019s leverage ratio .
the commitment fee rate as of december 31 , 2017 was 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) and may vary between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.30% ( 0.30 % ) .
the credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants , as well as a financial covenant based on a maximum total leverage ratio .
each of the company's existing and future material wholly owned domestic subsidiaries , except those that are specifically designated as unrestricted subsidiaries , are and will be guarantors under the credit facility .
in july 2015 , the company used cash on hand to repay all amounts outstanding under a prior credit facility , including $ 345 million in principal amount of outstanding term loans .
as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 15 million in letters of credit were issued but undrawn , and the remaining $ 1235 million of the revolving credit facility was unutilized .
the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with its credit facilities of $ 11 million and $ 8 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .
senior notes - in december 2017 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes with registration rights due december 2027 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2017 redemption described below .
in november 2015 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due november 2025 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2015 tender offer and redemption described below .
interest on the company's senior notes is payable semi-annually .
the terms of the 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) and 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes limit the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create liens , enter into sale and leaseback transactions , sell assets , and effect consolidations or mergers .
the company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes of $ 15 million and $ 19 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percentage change in in the pension liability balance from 2004 to 2006?

Pre-table text:
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) on historical trends and known economic and market conditions at the time of valuation .
actual results may differ substantially from these assumptions .
these differences may significantly impact future pension or retiree medical expenses .
annual pension and retiree medical expense is principally the sum of three components : 1 ) increase in liability from interest ; less 2 ) expected return on plan assets ; and 3 ) other gains and losses as described below .
the expected return on plan assets is calculated by applying an assumed long-term rate of return to the fair value of plan assets .
in any given year , actual returns can differ significantly from the expected return .
differences between the actual and expected return on plan assets are combined with gains or losses resulting from the revaluation of plan liabilities .
plan liabilities are revalued annually , based on updated assumptions and infor- mation about the individuals covered by the plan .
the combined gain or loss is generally expensed evenly over the remaining years that employees are expected to work .
comprehensive income ( loss ) the company accounts for comprehensive income ( loss ) in accordance with the provisions of sfas no .
130 , 201creporting comprehensive income 201d ( 201csfas no .
130 201d ) .
sfas no .
130 is a financial statement presentation standard that requires the company to disclose non-owner changes included in equity but not included in net income or loss .
other items of comprehensive income ( loss ) presented in the financial statements consists of adjustments to the company 2019s minimum pension liability as follows ( in thousands ) : pension adjustments accumulated comprehensive .

Table:
	pension adjustments	accumulated other comprehensive loss
balance as of october 1 2004	$ -786 ( 786 )	$ -786 ( 786 )
change in period	-351 ( 351 )	-351 ( 351 )
balance as of september 30 2005	-1137 ( 1137 )	-1137 ( 1137 )
change in period	538	538
balance as of september 29 2006	$ -599 ( 599 )	$ -599 ( 599 )

Post-table text:
recently issued accounting pronouncements in november 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no .
151 , 201cinventory costs 2014 an amendment to apb no .
23 , chapter 4 201d ( 201csfas no .
151 201d ) .
the amendments made by sfas no .
151 clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense , freight , handling costs and wasted materials ( spoilage ) should be recognized as current-period charges and require the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities .
the guidance is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after june 15 , 2005 .
the company adopted sfas no .
151 on october 1 , 2005 and it did not have a material impact on its financial statements in fiscal 2006 .
in december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no .
153 , 201cexchanges of nonmonetary assets 2014 an amend- ment of apb opinion no .
29 201d ( 201csfas no .
153 201d ) .
the guidance in apb opinion no .
29 , 201caccounting for nonmonetary transactions 201d ( 201capb no .
29 201d ) is based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged .
the guidance in apb no .
29 , however , included certain exceptions to that principle .
sfas no .
153 amends apb no .
29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance .
sfas no .
153 is effective for such exchange transactions occurring in fiscal periods beginning after june 15 , 2005 .
the company adopted sfas no .
153 on october 1 , 2005 and it did not have a material impact on its financial statements in fiscal 2006 .
in may 2005 , the fasb issued sfas no .
154 , 201caccounting changes and error corrections 2014 a replacement of apb opinion no .
20 and fasb statement no .
3 201d ( 201csfas no .
154 201d ) .
this statement replaces apb opinion no .
20 , 201caccounting changes 201d and fasb statement no .
3 , 201creporting accounting changes in interim financial statements 2014 an amendment of apb opinion no .
28 , 201d and also changes the .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in 2017 what was amount net sales applicable to international market in millions

Pre-table text:
south america .
approximately 26% ( 26 % ) of 2017 net sales were to international markets .
this segment sells directly through its own sales force and indirectly through independent manufacturers 2019 representatives , primarily to wholesalers , home centers , mass merchandisers and industrial distributors .
in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales of the plumbing segment in 2017 .
this segment 2019s chief competitors include delta ( owned by masco ) , kohler , pfister ( owned by spectrum brands ) , american standard ( owned by lixil group ) , insinkerator ( owned by emerson electronic company ) and imported private-label brands .
doors .
our doors segment manufactures and sells fiberglass and steel entry door systems under the therma-tru brand and urethane millwork product lines under the fypon brand .
this segment benefits from the long-term trend away from traditional materials , such as wood , steel and aluminum , toward more energy-efficient and durable synthetic materials .
therma-tru products include fiberglass and steel residential entry door and patio door systems , primarily for sale in the u.s .
and canada .
this segment 2019s principal customers are home centers , millwork building products and wholesale distributors , and specialty dealers that provide products to the residential new construction market , as well as to the remodeling and renovation markets .
in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 14% ( 14 % ) of net sales of the doors segment in 2017 .
this segment 2019s competitors include masonite , jeld-wen , plastpro and pella .
security .
our security segment 2019s products consist of locks , safety and security devices , and electronic security products manufactured , sourced and distributed primarily under the master lock brand and fire resistant safes , security containers and commercial cabinets manufactured , sourced and distributed under the sentrysafe brand .
this segment sells products principally in the u.s. , canada , europe , central america , japan and australia .
approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of 2017 net sales were to international markets .
this segment manufactures and sells key-controlled and combination padlocks , bicycle and cable locks , built-in locker locks , door hardware , automotive , trailer and towing locks , electronic access control solutions , and other specialty safety and security devices for consumer use to hardware , home center and other retail outlets .
in addition , the segment sells lock systems and fire resistant safes to locksmiths , industrial and institutional users , and original equipment manufacturers .
in aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 18% ( 18 % ) of the net sales of the security segment in 2017 .
master lock competes with abus , w.h .
brady , hampton , kwikset ( owned by spectrum brands ) , schlage ( owned by allegion ) , assa abloy and various imports , and sentrysafe competes with first alert , magnum , fortress , stack-on and fire king .
annual net sales for each of the last three fiscal years for each of our business segments were as follows : ( in millions ) 2017 2016 2015 .

Table:
( in millions )	2017	2016	2015
cabinets	$ 2467.1	$ 2397.8	$ 2173.4
plumbing	1720.8	1534.4	1414.5
doors	502.9	473.0	439.1
security	592.5	579.7	552.4
total	$ 5283.3	$ 4984.9	$ 4579.4

Post-table text:
for additional financial information for each of our business segments , refer to note 18 , 201cinformation on business segments , 201d to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this annual report on form other information raw materials .
the table below indicates the principal raw materials used by each of our segments .
these materials are available from a number of sources .
volatility in the prices of commodities and energy used in making and distributing our products impacts the cost of manufacturing our products. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what portion of the total contractual obligations are due within the next 12 months?

Pre-table text:
as a result of our acquisition of third wave on july 24 , 2008 , we assumed certain operating leases , the most significant of which is related to their corporate facility in madison , wisconsin , which is effective through september 2014 .
future lease payments on these operating leases were approximately $ 5.8 million as of september 27 , 2008 .
additionally , we assumed several license agreements for certain patent rights .
these payments will be made through 2011 and future payments under these license agreements are approximately $ 7.0 million as of september 27 , 2008 .
contractual obligations .
the following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commitments as of september 27 , 2008: .

Table:
contractual obligations	payments due by period less than 1 year	payments due by period 1-3 years	payments due by period 3-5 years	payments due by period more than 5 years	payments due by period total
long-term debt obligations	$ 38480	$ 109436	$ 327400	$ 1725584	$ 2200900
interest on long-term debt obligations	58734	110973	90433	7484	267624
operating leases	18528	33162	27199	63616	142505
purchase obligations ( 1 )	33176	15703	2014	2014	48879
financing leases	2408	5035	5333	15008	27784
long-term supply contracts ( 2 )	3371	6000	3750	2014	13121
private equity investment ( 3 )	1874	2014	2014	2014	1874
total contractual obligations	$ 156571	$ 280309	$ 454115	$ 1811692	$ 2702687

Post-table text:
( 1 ) approximately $ 6.4 million of the purchase obligations relates to an exclusive distribution and service agreement in the united states under which we will sell and service a line of extremity mri systems .
pursuant to the terms of this contract , we have certain minimum inventory purchase obligations for the initial term of eighteen months .
thereafter the purchase obligations are subject to renegotiation in the event of any unforeseen changes in the market dynamics .
( 2 ) as a result of the merger with cytyc , we assumed on a consolidated basis certain non-cancelable supply contracts .
for reasons of quality assurance , sole source availability or cost effectiveness , certain key components and raw materials are available only from a sole supplier .
to assure continuity of supply while maintaining high quality and reliability , long-term supply contracts have been executed with these suppliers .
in certain of these contracts , a minimum purchase commitment has been established .
( 3 ) as a result of the merger with cytyc , we assumed a private equity investment commitment with a limited liability partnership , which could be paid over the succeeding three years .
the amounts above do not include any amount that may be payable to biolucent and adiana for earn-outs .
we are working on several projects and we expect to continue to review and evaluate potential acquisitions of businesses , products or technologies , and strategic alliances that we believe will complement our current or future business .
subject to the risk factors set forth in part i , item 1a of this report and the general disclaimers set forth in our special note regarding forward-looking statements at the outset of this report , we believe that cash flow from operations and cash available from our amended credit agreement will provide us with sufficient funds in order to fund our expected operations over the next twelve months .
our longer-term liquidity is contingent upon future operating performance and our ability to continue to meet financial covenants under our amended credit agreement .
we may also require additional capital in the future to fund capital expenditures , acquisitions or other investments , or to repay our convertible notes .
the holders of the convertible notes may require us to repurchase the notes on december 13 of 2013 , and on each of december 15 , 2017 , 2022 , 2027 and 2032 at a repurchase price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of their accreted principal amount .
these capital requirements could be substantial .
our operating performance may also be affected by matters discussed under the above-referenced risk factors as elsewhere in this report .
these risks , trends and uncertainties may also adversely affect our long- term liquidity. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was total net undeveloped acres expiring for the three year period , in thousands?

Pre-table text:
in the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future .
if production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years .
we plan to continue the terms of certain of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions ; however , the majority of the undeveloped acres associated with other africa as listed in the table below pertains to our licenses in ethiopia and kenya , for which we executed agreements in 2015 to sell .
the kenya transaction closed in february 2016 and the ethiopia transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2016 .
see item 8 .
financial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about this disposition .
net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 .

Table:
( in thousands )	net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016	net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017	net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2018
u.s .	68	89	128
e.g .	2014	92	36
other africa	189	4352	854
total africa	189	4444	890
other international	2014	2014	2014
total	257	4533	1018

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage of the total estimated purchase price was cash?

Pre-table text:
table of contents hologic , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( all tabular amounts in thousands except per share data ) which the cytyc stockholders received a premium over the fair market value of their shares on such date and cash of $ 16.50 per share ( or approximately 35% ( 35 % ) of the merger consideration ) .
there were no preexisting relationships between the two companies .
cytyc , headquartered in marlborough , massachusetts , is a diversified diagnostic and medical device company that designs , develops , manufactures , and markets innovative and clinically effective diagnostics and surgical products .
cytyc products cover a range of cancer and women 2019s health applications , including cervical cancer screening , prenatal diagnostics , treatment of excessive menstrual bleeding and radiation treatment of early-stage breast cancer .
upon the close of the merger , cytyc shareholders received an aggregate of 132 million shares of hologic common stock and $ 2.1 billion in cash .
in connection with the close of the merger , the company entered into a credit agreement relating to a senior secured credit facility ( the 201ccredit agreement 201d ) with goldman sachs credit partners l.p .
and certain other lenders , in which the lenders committed to provide , in the aggregate , senior secured financing of up to approximately $ 2.55 billion to pay for the cash portion of the merger consideration , repayment of existing debt of cytyc , expenses relating to the merger and working capital following the completion of the merger .
as of the closing of the merger , the company borrowed $ 2.35 billion under this credit agreement .
see note 5 for further discussion .
the aggregate purchase price of approximately $ 6.16 billion included $ 2.1 million in cash ; 132 million shares of hologic common stock at an estimated fair value of $ 3.67 billion ; 16.5 million of fully vested stock options granted to cytyc employees in exchange for their vested cytyc stock options , with an estimated fair value of approximately $ 241.4 million ; the fair value of cytyc 2019s outstanding convertible notes assumed in the merger of $ 125.0 million ; and approximately $ 24.2 million of direct acquisition costs .
there were no potential contingent consideration arrangements payable to the former cytyc shareholders in connection with this transaction .
the company measured the fair value of the 132 million shares of the company common stock issued as consideration in connection with the merger under eitf 99-12 .
the company determined the measurement date to be may 20 , 2007 , the date the transaction was announced , as the number of shares to be issued according to the exchange ratio was fixed without subsequent revision .
the company valued the securities based on the average market price a few days before and after the measurement date .
the weighted average stock price was determined to be $ 27.81 .
( i ) purchase price the purchase price is as follows: .

Table:
cash portion of consideration	$ 2094800
fair value of securities issued	3671500
fair value of vested options exchanged	241400
fair value of cytyc 2019s outstanding convertible notes	125000
direct acquisition costs	24200
total estimated purchase price	$ 6156900

Post-table text:
source : hologic inc , 10-k , november 24 , 2010 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely .
the user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information , except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law .
past financial performance is no guarantee of future results. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the average future minimum annual rental payment for the next five years?

Pre-table text:
alexion pharmaceuticals , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , five month period ended december 31 , 2005 , and year ended july 31 , 2005 ( amounts in thousands , except share and per share amounts ) aggregate future minimum annual rental payments for the next five years and thereafter under non-cancellable operating leases ( including facilities and equipment ) as of december 31 , 2007 are: .

Table:
2008	$ 4935
2009	3144
2010	3160
2011	3200
2012	2768
thereafter	9934

Post-table text:
9 .
commitments and contingencies legal proceedings on march 16 , 2007 , pdl biopharma , inc. , or pdl , filed a civil action against alexion in the u.s .
district court for the district of delaware .
pdl claims willful infringement by alexion of pdl patents due to sales of soliris .
pdl seeks unspecified damages , but no less than a reasonable royalty , plus attorney 2019s fees .
alexion has denied pdl's claims .
in addition , we filed counterclaims seeking declarations of non-infringement and invalidity of certain u.s .
patents held by pdl .
alexion believes it has good and valid defenses to pdl's claims and intends to vigorously defend the case and pursue its counterclaims .
on february 4 , 2008 , sb2 , inc .
filed a civil action against alexion in the united states district court for the northern district of california .
sb2 , inc .
claims willfull infringement by alexion of sb2 , inc .
patents due to sales of soliris .
sb2 , inc .
seeks unspecified monetary damages , equitable relief and attorneys fees .
alexion believes it has good and valid defenses to sb2's claims and intends to vigorously defend the case and pursue its counterclaims .
the results of such civil actions cannot be predicted with certainty due to their early stages .
however , depending on the outcome of these legal matters , the operating results of the company could be materially impacted through adjustments to cost of sales ( see notes 2 , 6 and 15 for additional information related to royalties ) .
product supply the large-scale product supply agreement dated december 18 , 2002 , or the lonza agreement , between lonza sales ag , or lonza , and us , relating to the manufacture of soliris , was amended in june 2007 .
we amended our supply agreement to provide for additional purchase commitments of soliris of $ 30000 to $ 35000 through 2013 .
such commitments may only be cancelled in limited circumstances. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
net cash provided by operating activities increased by what percentage in 2014?

Pre-table text:
proportional free cash flow ( a non-gaap measure ) we define proportional free cash flow as cash flows from operating activities less maintenance capital expenditures ( including non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ) , adjusted for the estimated impact of noncontrolling interests .
the proportionate share of cash flows and related adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests in our subsidiaries comprise the proportional adjustment factor presented in the reconciliation below .
upon the company's adoption of the accounting guidance for service concession arrangements effective january 1 , 2015 , capital expenditures related to service concession assets that would have been classified as investing activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows are now classified as operating activities .
see note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies of this form 10-k for further information on the adoption of this guidance .
beginning in the quarter ended march 31 , 2015 , the company changed the definition of proportional free cash flow to exclude the cash flows for capital expenditures related to service concession assets that are now classified within net cash provided by operating activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows .
the proportional adjustment factor for these capital expenditures is presented in the reconciliation below .
we also exclude environmental capital expenditures that are expected to be recovered through regulatory , contractual or other mechanisms .
an example of recoverable environmental capital expenditures is ipl's investment in mats-related environmental upgrades that are recovered through a tracker .
see item 1 . 2014us sbu 2014ipl 2014environmental matters for details of these investments .
the gaap measure most comparable to proportional free cash flow is cash flows from operating activities .
we believe that proportional free cash flow better reflects the underlying business performance of the company , as it measures the cash generated by the business , after the funding of maintenance capital expenditures , that may be available for investing or repaying debt or other purposes .
factors in this determination include the impact of noncontrolling interests , where aes consolidates the results of a subsidiary that is not wholly-owned by the company .
the presentation of free cash flow has material limitations .
proportional free cash flow should not be construed as an alternative to cash from operating activities , which is determined in accordance with gaap .
proportional free cash flow does not represent our cash flow available for discretionary payments because it excludes certain payments that are required or to which we have committed , such as debt service requirements and dividend payments .
our definition of proportional free cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies .
calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions ) 2015 2014 2013 2015/2014change 2014/2013 change .

Table:
calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions )	2015	2014	2013	2015/2014 change	2014/2013 change
net cash provided by operating activities	$ 2134	$ 1791	$ 2715	$ 343	$ -924 ( 924 )
add : capital expenditures related to service concession assets ( 1 )	165	2014	2014	165	2014
adjusted operating cash flow	2299	1791	2715	508	-924 ( 924 )
less : proportional adjustment factor on operating cash activities ( 2 ) ( 3 )	-558 ( 558 )	-359 ( 359 )	-834 ( 834 )	-199 ( 199 )	475
proportional adjusted operating cash flow	1741	1432	1881	309	-449 ( 449 )
less : proportional maintenance capital expenditures net of reinsurance proceeds ( 2 )	-449 ( 449 )	-485 ( 485 )	-535 ( 535 )	36	50
less : proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ( 2 ) ( 4 )	-51 ( 51 )	-56 ( 56 )	-75 ( 75 )	5	19
proportional free cash flow	$ 1241	$ 891	$ 1271	$ 350	$ -380 ( 380 )

Post-table text:
( 1 ) service concession asset expenditures excluded from proportional free cash flow non-gaap metric .
( 2 ) the proportional adjustment factor , proportional maintenance capital expenditures ( net of reinsurance proceeds ) and proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures are calculated by multiplying the percentage owned by noncontrolling interests for each entity by its corresponding consolidated cash flow metric and are totaled to the resulting figures .
for example , parent company a owns 20% ( 20 % ) of subsidiary company b , a consolidated subsidiary .
thus , subsidiary company b has an 80% ( 80 % ) noncontrolling interest .
assuming a consolidated net cash flow from operating activities of $ 100 from subsidiary b , the proportional adjustment factor for subsidiary b would equal $ 80 ( or $ 100 x 80% ( 80 % ) ) .
the company calculates the proportional adjustment factor for each consolidated business in this manner and then sums these amounts to determine the total proportional adjustment factor used in the reconciliation .
the proportional adjustment factor may differ from the proportion of income attributable to noncontrolling interests as a result of ( a ) non-cash items which impact income but not cash and ( b ) aes' ownership interest in the subsidiary where such items occur .
( 3 ) includes proportional adjustment amount for service concession asset expenditures of $ 84 million for the year ended december 31 , 2015 .
the company adopted service concession accounting effective january 1 , 2015 .
( 4 ) excludes ipl's proportional recoverable environmental capital expenditures of $ 205 million , $ 163 million and $ 110 million for the years december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
assuming the same trend as in 2011 , what would total stock-based compensation cost be for 2012?

Pre-table text:
notes to the consolidated financial statements unrealized currency translation adjustments related to translation of foreign denominated balance sheets are not presented net of tax given that no deferred u.s .
income taxes have been provided on undistributed earnings of non- u.s .
subsidiaries because they are deemed to be reinvested for an indefinite period of time .
the tax ( cost ) benefit related to unrealized currency translation adjustments other than translation of foreign denominated balance sheets , for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 7 ) million , $ 8 million and $ 62 million , respectively .
the tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 98 million , $ 65 million and $ 18 million , respectively .
the cumulative tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 990 million and $ 889 million , respectively .
the tax ( cost ) benefit related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on marketable securities for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 0.2 ) million , $ 0.6 million and $ 0.1 million , respectively .
the tax benefit ( cost ) related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on derivatives for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 19 million , $ 1 million and $ ( 16 ) million , respectively .
18 .
employee savings plan ppg 2019s employee savings plan ( 201csavings plan 201d ) covers substantially all u.s .
employees .
the company makes matching contributions to the savings plan based upon participants 2019 savings , subject to certain limitations .
for most participants not covered by a collective bargaining agreement , company-matching contributions are established each year at the discretion of the company and are applied to a maximum of 6% ( 6 % ) of eligible participant compensation .
for those participants whose employment is covered by a collective bargaining agreement , the level of company-matching contribution , if any , is determined by the relevant collective bargaining agreement .
the company-matching contribution was 100% ( 100 % ) for the first two months of 2009 .
the company-matching contribution was suspended from march 2009 through june 2010 as a cost savings measure in recognition of the adverse impact of the global recession .
effective july 1 , 2010 , the company match was reinstated at 50% ( 50 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed for most employees eligible for the company-matching contribution feature .
this included the union represented employees in accordance with their collective bargaining agreements .
on january 1 , 2011 , the company match was increased to 75% ( 75 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed by these eligible employees .
compensation expense and cash contributions related to the company match of participant contributions to the savings plan for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 26 million , $ 9 million and $ 7 million , respectively .
a portion of the savings plan qualifies under the internal revenue code as an employee stock ownership plan .
as a result , the tax deductible dividends on ppg shares held by the savings plan were $ 20 million , $ 24 million and $ 28 million for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .
19 .
other earnings ( millions ) 2011 2010 2009 .

Table:
( millions )	2011	2010	2009
royalty income	55	58	45
share of net earnings ( loss ) of equity affiliates ( see note 5 )	37	45	-5 ( 5 )
gain on sale of assets	12	8	36
other	73	69	74
total	$ 177	$ 180	$ 150

Post-table text:
total $ 177 $ 180 $ 150 20 .
stock-based compensation the company 2019s stock-based compensation includes stock options , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and grants of contingent shares that are earned based on achieving targeted levels of total shareholder return .
all current grants of stock options , rsus and contingent shares are made under the ppg industries , inc .
amended and restated omnibus incentive plan ( 201cppg amended omnibus plan 201d ) , which was amended and restated effective april 21 , 2011 .
shares available for future grants under the ppg amended omnibus plan were 9.7 million as of december 31 , 2011 .
total stock-based compensation cost was $ 36 million , $ 52 million and $ 34 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .
the total income tax benefit recognized in the accompanying consolidated statement of income related to the stock-based compensation was $ 13 million , $ 18 million and $ 12 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .
stock options ppg has outstanding stock option awards that have been granted under two stock option plans : the ppg industries , inc .
stock plan ( 201cppg stock plan 201d ) and the ppg amended omnibus plan .
under the ppg amended omnibus plan and the ppg stock plan , certain employees of the company have been granted options to purchase shares of common stock at prices equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date the options were granted .
the options are generally exercisable beginning from six to 48 months after being granted and have a maximum term of 10 years .
upon exercise of a stock option , shares of company stock are issued from treasury stock .
the ppg stock plan includes a restored option provision for options originally granted prior to january 1 , 2003 that 68 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what are the future minimum commitments under the operating leases in 2015 as a percentage of the total future minimum commitments?

Pre-table text:
to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
the 2017 notes were issued at a discount of $ 6 million , which is being amortized over their ten-year term .
the company incurred approximately $ 4 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over ten years .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 2 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
13 .
commitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2035 .
future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) .

Table:
year	amount
2014	$ 135
2015	127
2016	110
2017	109
2018	106
thereafter	699
total	$ 1286

Post-table text:
rent expense and certain office equipment expense under agreements amounted to $ 137 million , $ 133 million and $ 154 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .
investment commitments .
at december 31 , 2013 , the company had $ 216 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including funds of private equity funds , real estate funds , infrastructure funds , opportunistic funds and distressed credit funds .
this amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds .
generally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment .
these unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition .
these commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company , but which are not yet legally binding .
the company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients .
contingencies contingent payments .
the company acts as the portfolio manager in a series of credit default swap transactions and has a maximum potential exposure of $ 17 million under a credit default swap between the company and counterparty .
see note 7 , derivatives and hedging , for further discussion .
contingent payments related to business acquisitions .
in connection with the credit suisse etf transaction , blackrock is required to make contingent payments annually to credit suisse , subject to achieving specified thresholds during a seven-year period , subsequent to the acquisition date .
in addition , blackrock is required to make contingent payments related to the mgpa transaction during a five-year period , subject to achieving specified thresholds , subsequent to the acquisition date .
the fair value of the contingent payments at december 31 , 2013 is not significant to the consolidated statement of financial condition and is included in other liabilities .
legal proceedings .
from time to time , blackrock receives subpoenas or other requests for information from various u.s .
federal , state governmental and domestic and international regulatory authorities in connection with certain industry-wide or other investigations or proceedings .
it is blackrock 2019s policy to cooperate fully with such inquiries .
the company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various legal actions , including arbitrations and other litigation arising in connection with blackrock 2019s activities .
additionally , certain blackrock- sponsored investment funds that the company manages are subject to lawsuits , any of which potentially could harm the investment returns of the applicable fund or result in the company being liable to the funds for any resulting damages .
management , after consultation with legal counsel , currently does not anticipate that the aggregate liability , if any , arising out of regulatory matters or lawsuits will have a material effect on blackrock 2019s results of operations , financial position , or cash flows .
however , there is no assurance as to whether any such pending or threatened matters will have a material effect on blackrock 2019s results of operations , financial position or cash flows in any future reporting period .
due to uncertainties surrounding the outcome of these matters , management cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss that may arise from these matters .
indemnifications .
in the ordinary course of business or in connection with certain acquisition agreements , blackrock enters into contracts pursuant to which it may agree to indemnify third parties in certain circumstances .
the terms of these indemnities vary from contract to contract and the amount of indemnification liability , if any , cannot be determined or the likelihood of any liability is considered remote .
consequently , no liability has been recorded on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
in connection with securities lending transactions , blackrock has issued certain indemnifications to certain securities lending clients against potential loss resulting from a borrower 2019s failure to fulfill its obligations under the securities lending agreement should the value of the collateral pledged by the borrower at the time of default be insufficient to cover the borrower 2019s obligation under the securities lending agreement .
at december 31 , 2013 , the company indemnified certain of its clients for their securities lending loan balances of approximately $ 118.3 billion .
the company held as agent , cash and securities totaling $ 124.6 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2013 .
the fair value of these indemnifications was not material at december 31 , 2013. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
for the fourth quarter ended december 312018 what was the total number of shares purchased in november

Pre-table text:
table of contents tceq and harris county pollution control services department ( hcpcs ) ( houston terminal ) .
we have an outstanding noe from the tceq and an outstanding vn from the hcpcs alleging excess emissions from tank 003 that occurred during hurricane harvey .
we are working with the pertinent authorities to resolve these matters .
item 4 .
mine safety disclosures part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock trades on the nyse under the trading symbol 201cvlo . 201d as of january 31 , 2019 , there were 5271 holders of record of our common stock .
dividends are considered quarterly by the board of directors , may be paid only when approved by the board , and will depend on our financial condition , results of operations , cash flows , prospects , industry conditions , capital requirements , and other factors and restrictions our board deems relevant .
there can be no assurance that we will pay a dividend at the rates we have paid historically , or at all , in the future .
the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2018 .
period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .

Table:
period	total numberof sharespurchased	averageprice paidper share	total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )	total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms	approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )
october 2018	939957	$ 87.23	8826	931131	$ 2.7 billion
november 2018	3655945	$ 87.39	216469	3439476	$ 2.4 billion
december 2018	3077364	$ 73.43	4522	3072842	$ 2.2 billion
total	7673266	$ 81.77	229817	7443449	$ 2.2 billion

Post-table text:
( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2018 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans .
( b ) on january 23 , 2018 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( the 2018 program ) , with no expiration date , which was in addition to the remaining amount available under a $ 2.5 billion program authorized on september 21 , 2016 ( the 2016 program ) .
during the fourth quarter of 2018 , we completed our purchases under the 2016 program .
as of december 31 , 2018 , we had $ 2.2 billion remaining available for purchase under the 2018 program. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the change in billions in tier 1 capital from 2007 to 2008?

Pre-table text:
mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts total mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts ( trust preferred securities ) , which qualify as tier 1 capital , were $ 23.899 billion at december 31 , 2008 , as compared to $ 23.594 billion at december 31 , 2007 .
in 2008 , citigroup did not issue any new enhanced trust preferred securities .
the frb issued a final rule , with an effective date of april 11 , 2005 , which retains trust preferred securities in tier 1 capital of bank holding companies , but with stricter quantitative limits and clearer qualitative standards .
under the rule , after a five-year transition period , the aggregate amount of trust preferred securities and certain other restricted core capital elements included in tier 1 capital of internationally active banking organizations , such as citigroup , would be limited to 15% ( 15 % ) of total core capital elements , net of goodwill , less any associated deferred tax liability .
the amount of trust preferred securities and certain other elements in excess of the limit could be included in tier 2 capital , subject to restrictions .
at december 31 , 2008 , citigroup had approximately 11.8% ( 11.8 % ) against the limit .
the company expects to be within restricted core capital limits prior to the implementation date of march 31 , 2009 .
the frb permits additional securities , such as the equity units sold to adia , to be included in tier 1 capital up to 25% ( 25 % ) ( including the restricted core capital elements in the 15% ( 15 % ) limit ) of total core capital elements , net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability .
at december 31 , 2008 , citigroup had approximately 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) against the limit .
the frb granted interim capital relief for the impact of adopting sfas 158 at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .
the frb and the ffiec may propose amendments to , and issue interpretations of , risk-based capital guidelines and reporting instructions .
these may affect reported capital ratios and net risk-weighted assets .
capital resources of citigroup 2019s depository institutions citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions in the united states are subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies , which are similar to the frb 2019s guidelines .
to be 201cwell capitalized 201d under federal bank regulatory agency definitions , citigroup 2019s depository institutions must have a tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6% ( 6 % ) , a total capital ( tier 1 + tier 2 capital ) ratio of at least 10% ( 10 % ) and a leverage ratio of at least 5% ( 5 % ) , and not be subject to a regulatory directive to meet and maintain higher capital levels .
at december 31 , 2008 , all of citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions were 201cwell capitalized 201d under the federal regulatory agencies 2019 definitions , including citigroup 2019s primary depository institution , citibank , n.a. , as noted in the following table : citibank , n.a .
components of capital and ratios under regulatory guidelines in billions of dollars at year end 2008 2007 .

Table:
in billions of dollars at year end	2008	2007
tier 1 capital	$ 71.0	$ 82.0
total capital ( tier 1 and tier 2 )	108.4	121.6
tier 1 capital ratio	9.94% ( 9.94 % )	8.98% ( 8.98 % )
total capital ratio ( tier 1 and tier 2 )	15.18	13.33
leverage ratio ( 1 )	5.82	6.65

Post-table text:
leverage ratio ( 1 ) 5.82 6.65 ( 1 ) tier 1 capital divided by adjusted average assets .
citibank , n.a .
had a net loss for 2008 amounting to $ 6.2 billion .
during 2008 , citibank , n.a .
received contributions from its parent company of $ 6.1 billion .
citibank , n.a .
did not issue any additional subordinated notes in 2008 .
total subordinated notes issued to citicorp holdings inc .
that were outstanding at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 and included in citibank , n.a . 2019s tier 2 capital , amounted to $ 28.2 billion .
citibank , n.a .
received an additional $ 14.3 billion in capital contribution from its parent company in january 2009 .
the impact of this contribution is not reflected in the table above .
the substantial events in 2008 impacting the capital of citigroup , and the potential future events discussed on page 94 under 201ccitigroup regulatory capital ratios , 201d also affected , or could affect , citibank , n.a. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the growth rate in operating profit for space systems in 2012?

Pre-table text:
2011 compared to 2010 mst 2019s net sales for 2011 decreased $ 311 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2010 .
the decrease was attributable to decreased volume of approximately $ 390 million for certain ship and aviation system programs ( primarily maritime patrol aircraft and ptds ) and approximately $ 75 million for training and logistics solutions programs .
partially offsetting these decreases was higher sales of about $ 165 million from production on the lcs program .
mst 2019s operating profit for 2011 decreased $ 68 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 .
the decrease was attributable to decreased operating profit of approximately $ 55 million as a result of increased reserves for contract cost matters on various ship and aviation system programs ( including the terminated presidential helicopter program ) and approximately $ 40 million due to lower volume and increased reserves on training and logistics solutions .
partially offsetting these decreases was higher operating profit of approximately $ 30 million in 2011 primarily due to the recognition of reserves on certain undersea systems programs in 2010 .
adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 55 million lower in 2011 compared to 2010 .
backlog backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders on ship and aviation system programs ( primarily mh-60 and lcs ) , partially offset decreased orders and higher sales volume on integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) .
backlog decreased slightly in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to higher sales volume on various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs .
trends we expect mst 2019s net sales to decline in 2013 in the low single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 due to the completion of ptds deliveries in 2012 and expected lower volume on training services programs .
operating profit and margin are expected to increase slightly from 2012 levels primarily due to anticipated improved contract performance .
space systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the research and development , design , engineering , and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems , and space transportation systems .
space systems is also responsible for various classified systems and services in support of vital national security systems .
space systems 2019 major programs include the space-based infrared system ( sbirs ) , advanced extremely high frequency ( aehf ) system , mobile user objective system ( muos ) , global positioning satellite ( gps ) iii system , geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) , trident ii d5 fleet ballistic missile , and orion .
operating results for our space systems business segment include our equity interests in united launch alliance ( ula ) , which provides expendable launch services for the u.s .
government , united space alliance ( usa ) , which provided processing activities for the space shuttle program and is winding down following the completion of the last space shuttle mission in 2011 , and a joint venture that manages the u.k . 2019s atomic weapons establishment program .
space systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2012	2011	2010
net sales	$ 8347	$ 8161	$ 8268
operating profit	1083	1063	1030
operating margins	13.0% ( 13.0 % )	13.0% ( 13.0 % )	12.5% ( 12.5 % )
backlog at year-end	18100	16000	17800

Post-table text:
2012 compared to 2011 space systems 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 186 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2011 .
the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 150 million due to increased commercial satellite deliveries ( two commercial satellites delivered in 2012 compared to one during 2011 ) ; about $ 125 million from the orion program due to higher volume and an increase in risk retirements ; and approximately $ 70 million from increased volume on various strategic and defensive missile programs .
partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 105 million from certain government satellite programs ( primarily sbirs and muos ) as a result of decreased volume and a decline in risk retirements ; and about $ 55 million from the nasa external tank program , which ended in connection with the completion of the space shuttle program in 2011. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
at december 31 , 2013 what was the ratio of square feet of our office in alpharetta , georgia to the jersey city new jersey

Pre-table text:
our ability to restructure or refinance our debt will depend on the condition of the capital markets and our financial condition at such time .
any refinancing of our debt could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants , which could further restrict our business operations .
in addition , any failure to make payments of interest and principal on our outstanding indebtedness on a timely basis would likely result in a reduction of our credit rating , which could harm our ability to incur additional indebtedness .
if our cash flows and available cash are insufficient to meet our debt service obligations , we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations .
we may not be able to consummate those dispositions or to obtain the proceeds that we could realize from them , and these proceeds may not be adequate to meet any debt service obligations then due .
item 1b .
unresolved staff comments item 2 .
properties a summary of our significant locations at december 31 , 2013 is shown in the following table .
all facilities are leased , except for 165000 square feet of our office in alpharetta , georgia .
square footage amounts are net of space that has been sublet or part of a facility restructuring. .

Table:
location	approximate square footage
alpharetta georgia	254000
jersey city new jersey	107000
arlington virginia	102000
sandy utah	66000
menlo park california	63000
new york new york	39000
chicago illinois ( 1 )	36000

Post-table text:
chicago , illinois ( 1 ) 36000 ( 1 ) includes approximately 25000 square footage related to g1 execution services , llc .
we entered into a definitive agreement to sell g1 execution services , llc to an affiliate of susquehanna .
the lease was assigned to susquehanna upon closing of the sale on february 10 , all of our facilities are used by either our trading and investing or balance sheet management segments , in addition to the corporate/other category .
all other leased facilities with space of less than 25000 square feet are not listed by location .
in addition to the significant facilities above , we also lease all 30 e*trade branches , ranging in space from approximately 2500 to 8000 square feet .
we believe our facilities space is adequate to meet our needs in 2014 .
item 3 .
legal proceedings on october 27 , 2000 , ajaxo , inc .
( 201cajaxo 201d ) filed a complaint in the superior court for the state of california , county of santa clara .
ajaxo sought damages and certain non-monetary relief for the company 2019s alleged breach of a non-disclosure agreement with ajaxo pertaining to certain wireless technology that ajaxo offered the company as well as damages and other relief against the company for their alleged misappropriation of ajaxo 2019s trade secrets .
following a jury trial , a judgment was entered in 2003 in favor of ajaxo against the company for $ 1.3 million for breach of the ajaxo non-disclosure agreement .
although the jury found in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets , the trial court subsequently denied ajaxo 2019s requests for additional damages and relief .
on december 21 , 2005 , the california court of appeal affirmed the above-described award against the company for breach of the nondisclosure agreement but remanded the case to the trial court for the limited purpose of determining what , if any , additional damages ajaxo may be entitled to as a result of the jury 2019s previous finding in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets .
although the company paid ajaxo the full amount due on the above-described judgment , the case was remanded back to the trial court , and on may 30 , 2008 , a jury returned a .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
at december 31 , 2005 what was the percent of the total commitment applicable to the standby letters of credit

Pre-table text:
page 38 five years .
the amounts ultimately applied against our offset agreements are based on negotiations with the customer and generally require cash outlays that represent only a fraction of the original amount in the offset agreement .
at december 31 , 2005 , we had outstanding offset agreements totaling $ 8.4 bil- lion , primarily related to our aeronautics segment , that extend through 2015 .
to the extent we have entered into purchase obligations at december 31 , 2005 that also satisfy offset agree- ments , those amounts are included in the preceding table .
we have entered into standby letter of credit agreements and other arrangements with financial institutions and custom- ers mainly relating to advances received from customers and/or the guarantee of future performance on some of our contracts .
at december 31 , 2005 , we had outstanding letters of credit , surety bonds and guarantees , as follows : commitment expiration by period ( in millions ) commitment 1 year ( a ) years ( a ) standby letters of credit $ 2630 $ 2425 $ 171 $ 18 $ 16 .

Table:
( in millions )	commitment expiration by period total commitment	commitment expiration by period less than 1 year ( a )	commitment expiration by period 1-3 years ( a )	commitment expiration by period 3-5 years	commitment expiration by period after 5 years
standby letters of credit	$ 2630	$ 2425	$ 171	$ 18	$ 16
surety bonds	434	79	352	3	2014
guarantees	2	1	1	2014	2014
total commitments	$ 3066	$ 2505	$ 524	$ 21	$ 16

Post-table text:
( a ) approximately $ 2262 million and $ 49 million of standby letters of credit in the 201cless than 1 year 201d and 201c1-3 year 201d periods , respectively , and approximately $ 38 million of surety bonds in the 201cless than 1 year 201d period are expected to renew for additional periods until completion of the contractual obligation .
included in the table above is approximately $ 200 million representing letter of credit and surety bond amounts for which related obligations or liabilities are also recorded in the bal- ance sheet , either as reductions of inventories , as customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred , or as other liabilities .
approximately $ 2 billion of the standby letters of credit in the table above were to secure advance payments received under an f-16 contract from an international cus- tomer .
these letters of credit are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance , and the amount available will be reduced as certain events occur throughout the period of performance in accordance with the contract terms .
similar to the letters of credit for the f-16 contract , other letters of credit and surety bonds are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance .
at december 31 , 2005 , we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements as those arrangements are defined by the securities and exchange commission ( sec ) .
quantitative and qualitative disclosure of market risk our main exposure to market risk relates to interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates .
our financial instruments that are subject to interest rate risk principally include fixed- rate and floating rate long-term debt .
if interest rates were to change by plus or minus 1% ( 1 % ) , interest expense would increase or decrease by approximately $ 10 million related to our float- ing rate debt .
the estimated fair values of the corporation 2019s long-term debt instruments at december 31 , 2005 aggregated approximately $ 6.2 billion , compared with a carrying amount of approximately $ 5.0 billion .
the majority of our long-term debt obligations are not callable until maturity .
we have used interest rate swaps in the past to manage our exposure to fixed and variable interest rates ; however , at year-end 2005 , we had no such agreements in place .
we use forward foreign exchange contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates , and do so in ways that qualify for hedge accounting treatment .
these exchange contracts hedge the fluctuations in cash flows associated with firm commitments or specific anticipated transactions contracted in foreign currencies , or hedge the exposure to rate changes affecting foreign currency denomi- nated assets or liabilities .
related gains and losses on these contracts , to the extent they are effective hedges , are recog- nized in income at the same time the hedged transaction is recognized or when the hedged asset or liability is adjusted .
to the extent the hedges are ineffective , gains and losses on the contracts are recognized in the current period .
at december 31 , 2005 , the fair value of forward exchange con- tracts outstanding , as well as the amounts of gains and losses recorded during the year then ended , were not material .
we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trad- ing or speculative purposes .
recent accounting pronouncements in december 2004 , the fasb issued fas 123 ( r ) , share- based payments , which will impact our net earnings and earn- ings per share and change the classification of certain elements of the statement of cash flows .
fas 123 ( r ) requires stock options and other share-based payments made to employees to be accounted for as compensation expense and recorded at fair lockheed martin corporation management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations december 31 , 2005 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percent change in quarterly cash dividend for the period ended march 31 2002 to the period ended march 31 2003?

Pre-table text:
market price and dividends d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 3 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t the company 2019s common shares are listed for trading on the new york stock exchange , symbol dre .
the following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common stock for the periods indicated and the dividend paid per share during each such period .
comparable cash dividends are expected in the future .
on january 29 , 2003 , the company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ .455 per share , payable on february 28 , 2003 , to common shareholders of record on february 14 , 2003. .

Table:
quarter ended	2002 high	2002 low	2002 dividend	2002 high	2002 low	dividend
december 31	$ 25.84	$ 21.50	$ .455	$ 24.80	$ 22.00	$ .45
september 30	28.88	21.40	.455	26.17	21.60	.45
june 30	28.95	25.46	.450	24.99	22.00	.43
march 31	26.50	22.92	.450	25.44	21.85	.43

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what portion of the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2005 is related to non-tower cash flow?

Pre-table text:
with apb no .
25 .
instead , companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the related expense associated with share-based payments in the statement of operations .
sfas 123r is effective for us as of january 1 , 2006 .
we have historically accounted for share-based payments to employees under apb no .
25 2019s intrinsic value method .
as such , we generally have not recognized compensation expense for options granted to employees .
we will adopt the provisions of sfas 123r under the modified prospective method , in which compensation cost for all share-based payments granted or modified after the effective date is recognized based upon the requirements of sfas 123r , and compensation cost for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date that are unvested as of the effective date of sfas 123r is recognized based on sfas 123 .
tax benefits will be recognized related to the cost for share-based payments to the extent the equity instrument would ordinarily result in a future tax deduction under existing law .
tax expense will be recognized to write off excess deferred tax assets when the tax deduction upon settlement of a vested option is less than the expense recorded in the statement of operations ( to the extent not offset by prior tax credits for settlements where the tax deduction was greater than the fair value cost ) .
we estimate that we will recognize equity-based compensation expense of approximately $ 35 million to $ 38 million for the year ending december 31 , 2006 .
this amount is subject to revisions as we finalize certain assumptions related to 2006 , including the size and nature of awards and forfeiture rates .
sfas 123r also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow rather than as operating cash flow as was previously required .
we cannot estimate what the future tax benefits will be as the amounts depend on , among other factors , future employee stock option exercises .
due to the our tax loss position , there was no operating cash inflow realized for december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for such excess tax deductions .
in march 2005 , the sec issued staff accounting bulletin ( sab ) no .
107 regarding the staff 2019s interpretation of sfas 123r .
this interpretation provides the staff 2019s views regarding interactions between sfas 123r and certain sec rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies .
the interpretive guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of sfas 123r and investors and users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided .
we will follow the guidance prescribed in sab no .
107 in connection with our adoption of sfas 123r .
information presented pursuant to the indentures of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) the following table sets forth information that is presented solely to address certain tower cash flow reporting requirements contained in the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .
the information contained in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements is also presented to address certain reporting requirements contained in the indenture for our ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .
the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005	$ 139590
consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ 498266
less : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	-524804 ( 524804 )
plus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005	558360
adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ 531822
non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005	$ -30584 ( 30584 )

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}