[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the book to market ratio of the commercial mortgage-backed securities

Pre-table text:
the company had net realized capital losses for 2015 of $ 184.1 million .
in 2015 , the company recorded $ 102.2 million of other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities , $ 45.6 million of losses due to fair value re-measurements and $ 36.3 million of net realized capital losses from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities .
in 2014 , net realized capital gains were $ 84.0 million due to $ 121.7 million of gains from fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity and equity securities and $ 1.9 million of net realized capital gains from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities , partially offset by $ 39.5 million of other-than- temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities .
in 2013 , net realized capital gains were $ 300.2 million due to $ 258.9 million of gains due to fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity and equity securities and $ 42.4 million of net realized capital gains from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities , partially offset by $ 1.1 million of other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities .
the company 2019s cash and invested assets totaled $ 17.7 billion at december 31 , 2015 , which consisted of 87.4% ( 87.4 % ) fixed maturities and cash , of which 91.4% ( 91.4 % ) were investment grade ; 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) equity securities and 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) other invested assets .
the average maturity of fixed maturity securities was 4.1 years at december 31 , 2015 , and their overall duration was 3.0 years .
as of december 31 , 2015 , the company did not have any direct investments in commercial real estate or direct commercial mortgages or any material holdings of derivative investments ( other than equity index put option contracts as discussed in item 8 , 201cfinancial statements and supplementary data 201d - note 4 of notes to consolidated financial statements ) or securities of issuers that are experiencing cash flow difficulty to an extent that the company 2019s management believes could threaten the issuer 2019s ability to meet debt service payments , except where other-than-temporary impairments have been recognized .
the company 2019s investment portfolio includes structured commercial mortgage-backed securities ( 201ccmbs 201d ) with a book value of $ 264.9 million and a market value of $ 266.3 million .
cmbs securities comprising more than 70% ( 70 % ) of the december 31 , 2015 market value are rated aaa by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc ( 201cstandard & poor 2019s 201d ) .
furthermore , securities comprising more than 90% ( 90 % ) of the market value are rated investment grade by standard & poor 2019s .
the following table reflects investment results for the company for the periods indicated: .

Table:
( dollars in millions )	december 31 , average investments ( 1 )	december 31 , pre-tax investment income ( 2 )	december 31 , pre-tax effective yield	december 31 , pre-tax realized net capital ( losses ) gains ( 3 )	december 31 , pre-tax unrealized net capital gains ( losses )
2015	$ 17430.8	$ 473.8	2.72% ( 2.72 % )	$ -184.1 ( 184.1 )	$ -194.0 ( 194.0 )
2014	16831.9	530.6	3.15% ( 3.15 % )	84.0	20.3
2013	16472.5	548.5	3.33% ( 3.33 % )	300.2	-467.2 ( 467.2 )
2012	16220.9	600.2	3.70% ( 3.70 % )	164.4	161.0
2011	15680.9	620.0	3.95% ( 3.95 % )	6.9	106.6

Post-table text:
pre-tax pre-tax pre-tax pre-tax realized net unrealized net average investment effective capital ( losses ) capital gains ( dollars in millions ) investments ( 1 ) income ( 2 ) yield gains ( 3 ) ( losses ) 17430.8$ 473.8$ 2.72% ( 2.72 % ) ( 184.1 ) $ ( 194.0 ) $ 16831.9 530.6 3.15% ( 3.15 % ) 84.0 20.3 16472.5 548.5 3.33% ( 3.33 % ) 300.2 ( 467.2 ) 16220.9 600.2 3.70% ( 3.70 % ) 164.4 161.0 15680.9 620.0 3.95% ( 3.95 % ) 6.9 106.6 ( 1 ) average of the beginning and ending carrying values of investments and cash , less net funds held , future policy benefit reserve , and non-interest bearing cash .
bonds , common stock and redeemable and non-redeemable preferred stocks are carried at market value .
common stock which are actively managed are carried at fair value .
( 2 ) after investment expenses , excluding realized net capital gains ( losses ) .
( 3 ) included in 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 are fair value re-measurements of ( $ 45.6 ) million , $ 121.7 million , $ 258.9 million , $ 118.1 million and ( $ 4.4 ) million , respectively. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
by what percentage did the average henry hub natural gas benchmark decrease from 2007 to 2009?

Pre-table text:
item 7 .
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are a global integrated energy company with significant operations in the north america , africa and europe .
our operations are organized into four reportable segments : 2022 exploration and production ( 201ce&p 201d ) which explores for , produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis .
2022 oil sands mining ( 201cosm 201d ) which mines , extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta , canada , and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas 2022 integrated gas ( 201cig 201d ) which markets and transports products manufactured from natural gas , such as liquefied natural gas ( 201clng 201d ) and methanol , on a worldwide basis .
2022 refining , marketing & transportation ( 201crm&t 201d ) which refines , markets and transports crude oil and petroleum products , primarily in the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states .
certain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward-looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business .
these statements typically contain words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201ctargets , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cprojects , 201d 201ccould , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould 201d or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain .
in accordance with 201csafe harbor 201d provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 , these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors , though not necessarily all such factors , which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements .
we hold a 60 percent interest in equatorial guinea lng holdings limited ( 201cegholdings 201d ) .
as discussed in note 4 to the consolidated financial statements , effective may 1 , 2007 , we ceased consolidating egholdings .
our investment is accounted for using the equity method of accounting .
unless specifically noted , amounts presented for the integrated gas segment for periods prior to may 1 , 2007 , include amounts related to the minority interests .
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1 .
business , item 1a .
risk factors , item 6 .
selected financial data and item 8 .
financial statements and supplementary data .
overview exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows .
prices were volatile in 2009 , but not as much as in the previous year .
prices in 2009 were also lower than in recent years as illustrated by the annual averages for key benchmark prices below. .

Table:
benchmark	2009	2008	2007
wti crude oil ( dollars per barrel )	$ 62.09	$ 99.75	$ 72.41
dated brent crude oil ( dollars per barrel )	$ 61.67	$ 97.26	$ 72.39
henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mcf ) ( a )	$ 3.99	$ 9.04	$ 6.86

Post-table text:
henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mcf ) ( a ) $ 3.99 $ 9.04 $ 6.86 ( a ) first-of-month price index .
crude oil prices rose sharply through the first half of 2008 as a result of strong global demand , a declining dollar , ongoing concerns about supplies of crude oil , and geopolitical risk .
later in 2008 , crude oil prices sharply declined as the u.s .
dollar rebounded and global demand decreased as a result of economic recession .
the price decrease continued into 2009 , but reversed after dropping below $ 33.98 in february , ending the year at $ 79.36 .
our domestic crude oil production is about 62 percent sour , which means that it contains more sulfur than light sweet wti does .
sour crude oil also tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil and sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil because of higher refining costs and lower refined product values .
our international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the dated brent crude benchmark .
the differential between wti and dated brent average prices narrowed to $ 0.42 in 2009 compared to $ 2.49 in 2008 and $ 0.02 in 2007. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percentage of decrease of long-term debt from 2007 to 2011?

Pre-table text:
53management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in order to borrow funds under the 5-year credit facility , the company must be in compliance with various conditions , covenants and representations contained in the agreements .
the company was in compliance with the terms of the 5-year credit facility at december 31 , 2006 .
the company has never borrowed under its domestic revolving credit facilities .
utilization of the non-u.s .
credit facilities may also be dependent on the company's ability to meet certain conditions at the time a borrowing is requested .
contractual obligations , guarantees , and other purchase commitments contractual obligations summarized in the table below are the company's obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations ( assuming earliest possible exercise of put rights by holders ) , lease payment obligations , and purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2006 .
payments due by period ( 1 ) ( in millions ) total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 thereafter .

Table:
( in millions )	payments due by period ( 1 ) total	payments due by period ( 1 ) 2007	payments due by period ( 1 ) 2008	payments due by period ( 1 ) 2009	payments due by period ( 1 ) 2010	payments due by period ( 1 ) 2011	payments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter
long-term debt obligations	$ 4134	$ 1340	$ 198	$ 4	$ 534	$ 607	$ 1451
lease obligations	2328	351	281	209	178	158	1151
purchase obligations	1035	326	120	26	12	12	539
total contractual obligations	$ 7497	$ 2017	$ 599	$ 239	$ 724	$ 777	$ 3141

Post-table text:
( 1 ) amounts included represent firm , non-cancelable commitments .
debt obligations : at december 31 , 2006 , the company's long-term debt obligations , including current maturities and unamortized discount and issue costs , totaled $ 4.1 billion , as compared to $ 4.0 billion at december 31 , 2005 .
a table of all outstanding long-term debt securities can be found in note 4 , ""debt and credit facilities'' to the company's consolidated financial statements .
lease obligations : the company owns most of its major facilities , but does lease certain office , factory and warehouse space , land , and information technology and other equipment under principally non-cancelable operating leases .
at december 31 , 2006 , future minimum lease obligations , net of minimum sublease rentals , totaled $ 2.3 billion .
rental expense , net of sublease income , was $ 241 million in 2006 , $ 250 million in 2005 and $ 205 million in 2004 .
purchase obligations : the company has entered into agreements for the purchase of inventory , license of software , promotional agreements , and research and development agreements which are firm commitments and are not cancelable .
the longest of these agreements extends through 2015 .
total payments expected to be made under these agreements total $ 1.0 billion .
commitments under other long-term agreements : the company has entered into certain long-term agreements to purchase software , components , supplies and materials from suppliers .
most of the agreements extend for periods of one to three years ( three to five years for software ) .
however , generally these agreements do not obligate the company to make any purchases , and many permit the company to terminate the agreement with advance notice ( usually ranging from 60 to 180 days ) .
if the company were to terminate these agreements , it generally would be liable for certain termination charges , typically based on work performed and supplier on-hand inventory and raw materials attributable to canceled orders .
the company's liability would only arise in the event it terminates the agreements for reasons other than ""cause.'' the company also enters into a number of arrangements for the sourcing of supplies and materials with minimum purchase commitments and take-or-pay obligations .
the majority of the minimum purchase obligations under these contracts are over the life of the contract as opposed to a year-by-year take-or-pay .
if these agreements were terminated at december 31 , 2006 , the company's obligation would not have been significant .
the company does not anticipate the cancellation of any of these agreements in the future .
subsequent to the end of 2006 , the company entered into take-or-pay arrangements with suppliers through may 2009 with minimum purchase obligations of $ 2.2 billion during that period .
the company estimates purchases during that period that exceed the minimum obligations .
the company outsources certain corporate functions , such as benefit administration and information technology-related services .
these contracts are expected to expire in 2013 .
the total remaining payments under these contracts are approximately $ 1.3 billion over the remaining seven years ; however , these contracts can be %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c11830 pcn : 055000000 *** %%pcmsg| |00030|yes|no|02/28/2007 13:05|0|1|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
for 2012 , what percent of the home equity lines of credit interest only product was due to home equity lines of credit with balloon payments?

Pre-table text:
generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term .
during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest .
based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2011 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end .
home equity lines of credit - draw period end dates in millions interest only product principal and interest product .

Table:
in millions	interest only product	principal and interest product
2012	$ 904	$ 266
2013	1211	331
2014	2043	598
2015	1988	820
2016 and thereafter	6961	5601
total ( a )	$ 13107	$ 7616

Post-table text:
( a ) includes approximately $ 306 million , $ 44 million , $ 60 million , $ 100 million , and $ 246 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , and 2016 and thereafter , respectively .
we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments .
based upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2011 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 4.32% ( 4.32 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.57% ( 5.57 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due .
generally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated .
at that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr .
see note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information .
loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate .
initially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program .
if a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program .
our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal .
temporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs .
further , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs .
additional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .
a temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to the original loan terms as of a specific date or the occurrence of an event , such as a failure to pay in accordance with the terms of the modification .
typically , these modifications are for a period of up to 24 months after which the interest rate reverts to the original loan rate .
a permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed .
permanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs .
for consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance .
examples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment .
permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made .
residential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months .
we also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses .
the following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months and twelve months after the modification date .
78 the pnc financial services group , inc .
2013 form 10-k .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the growth rate of snap's share price from 2007 to 2008?

Pre-table text:
five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2007 , assuming that dividends were reinvested .
the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group .
snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .

Table:
fiscal year ended ( 2 )	snap-onincorporated	peer group ( 3 )	s&p 500
december 31 2007	$ 100.00	$ 100.00	$ 100.00
december 31 2008	83.66	66.15	63.00
december 31 2009	93.20	84.12	79.67
december 31 2010	128.21	112.02	91.67
december 31 2011	117.47	109.70	93.61
december 31 2012	187.26	129.00	108.59

Post-table text:
( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 , and that dividends were reinvested quarterly .
( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 .
( 3 ) the peer group consists of : stanley black & decker , inc. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair ltd. , spx corporation and w.w .
grainger , inc .
cooper industries plc , a former member of the peer group , was removed , as it was acquired by a larger , non-comparable company in 2012 .
2012 annual report 23 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 2007 2008 201120102009 2012 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
as of may 31 , 2016 what percentage of cash and cash equivalents was held in foreign subsidiaries?

Pre-table text:
part ii capital resources on april 23 , 2013 , we filed a shelf registration statement ( the 201cshelf 201d ) with the sec which permitted us to issue an unlimited amount of debt securities .
on april 23 , 2013 , we issued $ 1.0 billion of senior notes with tranches maturing in 2023 and 2043 .
the 2023 senior notes were issued in an initial aggregate principal amount of $ 500 million at a 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) fixed , annual interest rate and will mature on may 1 , 2023 .
the 2043 senior notes were issued in an initial aggregate principal amount of $ 500 million at a 3.625% ( 3.625 % ) fixed , annual interest rate and will mature on may 1 , 2043 .
interest on the senior notes is payable semi-annually on may 1 and november 1 of each year .
the issuance resulted in gross proceeds before expenses of $ 998 million .
on october 29 , 2015 , we issued an additional $ 1.0 billion of senior notes at a 3.875% ( 3.875 % ) fixed , annual interest rate that will mature on november 1 , 2045 .
interest on the senior notes is payable semi-annually on may 1 and november 1 of each year .
the issuance resulted in proceeds before expenses of $ 991 million .
the shelf expired on april 23 , 2016 .
we plan to file a new shelf registration statement with the sec in july 2016 .
on august 28 , 2015 , we entered into a committed credit facility agreement with a syndicate of banks , which provides for up to $ 2 billion of borrowings .
the facility matures august 28 , 2020 , with a one year extension option prior to any anniversary of the closing date , provided that in no event shall it extend beyond august 28 , 2022 .
this facility replaces the prior $ 1 billion credit facility agreement entered into on november 1 , 2011 , which would have matured november 1 , 2017 .
as of and for the periods ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 , we had no amounts outstanding under either committed credit facility .
we currently have long-term debt ratings of aa- and a1 from standard and poor 2019s corporation and moody 2019s investor services , respectively .
if our long- term debt ratings were to decline , the facility fee and interest rate under our committed credit facility would increase .
conversely , if our long-term debt rating were to improve , the facility fee and interest rate would decrease .
changes in our long-term debt rating would not trigger acceleration of maturity of any then-outstanding borrowings or any future borrowings under the committed credit facility .
under this committed revolving credit facility , we have agreed to various covenants .
these covenants include limits on our disposal of fixed assets , the amount of debt secured by liens we may incur , as well as limits on the indebtedness we can incur relative to our net worth .
in the event we were to have any borrowings outstanding under this facility and failed to meet any covenant , and were unable to obtain a waiver from a majority of the banks in the syndicate , any borrowings would become immediately due and payable .
as of may 31 , 2016 , we were in full compliance with each of these covenants and believe it is unlikely we will fail to meet any of these covenants in the foreseeable future .
liquidity is also provided by our $ 2 billion commercial paper program , which increased $ 1 billion during the second quarter of fiscal 2016 .
during the year ended may 31 , 2016 , we did not issue commercial paper , and as of may 31 , 2016 , there were no outstanding borrowings under this program .
any future issuance of commercial paper or other debt securities during fiscal 2017 will depend on general corporate needs .
we currently have short-term debt ratings of a1+ and p1 from standard and poor 2019s corporation and moody 2019s investor services , respectively .
as of may 31 , 2016 , we had cash , cash equivalents and short-term investments totaling $ 5.5 billion , of which $ 4.6 billion was held by our foreign subsidiaries .
included in cash and equivalents as of may 31 , 2016 was $ 105 million of cash collateral received from counterparties as a result of hedging activity .
cash equivalents and short-term investments consist primarily of deposits held at major banks , money market funds , commercial paper , corporate notes , u.s .
treasury obligations , u.s .
government sponsored enterprise obligations and other investment grade fixed income securities .
our fixed income investments are exposed to both credit and interest rate risk .
all of our investments are investment grade to minimize our credit risk .
while individual securities have varying durations , as of may 31 , 2016 , the weighted average remaining duration of our cash equivalents and short-term investments portfolio was 91 days .
to date we have not experienced difficulty accessing the credit markets or incurred higher interest costs .
future volatility in the capital markets , however , may increase costs associated with issuing commercial paper or other debt instruments or affect our ability to access those markets .
we believe that existing cash , cash equivalents , short-term investments and cash generated by operations , together with access to external sources of funds as described above , will be sufficient to meet our domestic and foreign capital needs in the foreseeable future .
we utilize a variety of tax planning and financing strategies to manage our worldwide cash and deploy funds to locations where they are needed .
we routinely repatriate a portion of our foreign earnings for which u.s .
taxes have previously been provided .
we also indefinitely reinvest a significant portion of our foreign earnings , and our current plans do not demonstrate a need to repatriate these earnings .
should we require additional capital in the united states , we may elect to repatriate indefinitely reinvested foreign funds or raise capital in the united states through debt .
if we were to repatriate indefinitely reinvested foreign funds , we would be required to accrue and pay additional u.s .
taxes less applicable foreign tax credits .
if we elect to raise capital in the united states through debt , we would incur additional interest expense .
off-balance sheet arrangements in connection with various contracts and agreements , we routinely provide indemnification relating to the enforceability of intellectual property rights , coverage for legal issues that arise and other items where we are acting as the guarantor .
currently , we have several such agreements in place .
however , based on our historical experience and the estimated probability of future loss , we have determined that the fair value of such indemnification is not material to our financial position or results of operations .
contractual obligations our significant long-term contractual obligations as of may 31 , 2016 and significant endorsement contracts , including related marketing commitments , entered into through the date of this report are as follows: .

Table:
description of commitment ( in millions )	description of commitment 2017	description of commitment 2018	description of commitment 2019	description of commitment 2020	description of commitment 2021	description of commitment thereafter	total
operating leases	$ 491	$ 453	$ 395	$ 347	$ 301	$ 1244	$ 3231
capital leases	7	5	2	1	2014	2014	15
long-term debt ( 1 )	115	75	74	74	71	3365	3774
endorsement contracts ( 2 )	1198	1238	945	827	698	4514	9420
product purchase obligations ( 3 )	4149	2014	2014	2014	2014	2014	4149
other purchase obligations ( 4 )	384	118	90	48	42	90	772
total	$ 6344	$ 1889	$ 1506	$ 1297	$ 1112	$ 9213	$ 21361

Post-table text:
( 1 ) the cash payments due for long-term debt include estimated interest payments .
estimates of interest payments are based on outstanding principal amounts , applicable fixed interest rates or currently effective interest rates as of may 31 , 2016 ( if variable ) , timing of scheduled payments and the term of the debt obligations. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
percent change in fair value of beginning assets in this time period?

Pre-table text:
zimmer biomet holdings , inc .
and subsidiaries 2017 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of our foreign pension plan assets measured at fair value that used significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	december 31 2017
beginning balance	$ 78.7
gains on assets sold	0.3
change in fair value of assets	3.8
net purchases and sales	5.2
translation gain	3.0
ending balance	$ 91.0

Post-table text:
we expect that we will have no legally required minimum funding requirements in 2018 for the qualified u.s .
and puerto rico defined benefit retirement plans , nor do we expect to voluntarily contribute to these plans during 2018 .
contributions to foreign defined benefit plans are estimated to be $ 17.0 million in 2018 .
we do not expect the assets in any of our plans to be returned to us in the next year .
defined contribution plans we also sponsor defined contribution plans for substantially all of the u.s .
and puerto rico employees and certain employees in other countries .
the benefits offered under these plans are reflective of local customs and practices in the countries concerned .
we expensed $ 47.9 million , $ 42.5 million and $ 40.2 million related to these plans for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .
15 .
income taxes 2017 tax act : the president signed u.s .
tax reform legislation ( 201c2017 tax act 201d ) on december 22 , 2017 , which is considered the enactment date .
the 2017 tax act includes a broad range of provisions , many of which significantly differ from those contained in previous u.s .
tax law .
changes in tax law are accounted for in the period of enactment .
as such , our 2017 consolidated financial statements reflect the immediate tax effect of the 2017 tax act .
the 2017 tax act contains several key provisions including , among other things : 2022 a one-time tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of post-1986 untaxed foreign earnings and profits ( e&p ) , referred to as the toll charge ; 2022 a reduction in the corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent for tax years beginning after december 31 , 2022 the introduction of a new u.s .
tax on certain off-shore earnings referred to as global intangible low-taxed income ( gilti ) at an effective tax rate of 10.5 percent for tax years beginning after december 31 , 2017 ( increasing to 13.125 percent for tax years beginning after december 31 , 2025 ) , with a partial offset by foreign tax credits ; and 2022 the introduction of a territorial tax system beginning in 2018 by providing a 100 percent dividend received deduction on certain qualified dividends from foreign subsidiaries .
during the fourth quarter of 2017 , we recorded an income tax benefit of $ 1272.4 million , which was comprised of the following : 2022 income tax benefit of $ 715.0 million for the one-time deemed repatriation of foreign earnings .
this is composed of a $ 1181.0 million benefit from the removal of a deferred tax liability we had recorded for the repatriation of foreign earnings prior to the 2017 tax act offset by $ 466.0 million for the toll charge recognized under the 2017 tax act .
in accordance with the 2017 tax act , we expect to elect to pay the toll charge in installments over eight years .
as of december 31 , 2017 , we have recorded current and non-current income tax liabilities related to the toll charge of $ 82.0 million and $ 384.0 million , respectively .
2022 an income tax benefit of $ 557.4 million , primarily related to the remeasurement of our deferred tax assets and liabilities at the enacted corporate income tax rate of 21 percent .
the net benefit recorded was based on currently available information and interpretations made in applying the provisions of the 2017 tax act as of the time of filing this annual report on form 10-k .
we further refined our estimates related to the impact of the 2017 tax act subsequent to the issuance of our earnings release for the fourth quarter of 2017 .
in accordance with authoritative guidance issued by the sec , the income tax effect for certain aspects of the 2017 tax act represent provisional amounts for which our accounting is incomplete , but with respect to which a reasonable estimate could be determined and recorded during the fourth quarter of 2017 .
the actual effects of the 2017 tax act and final amounts recorded may differ materially from our current estimate of provisional amounts due to , among other things , further interpretive guidance that may be issued by u.s .
tax authorities or regulatory bodies , including the sec and the fasb .
we will continue to analyze the 2017 tax act and any additional guidance that may be issued so we can finalize the full effects of applying the new legislation on our financial statements in the measurement period , which ends in the fourth quarter of 2018 .
we continue to evaluate the impacts of the 2017 tax act and consider the amounts recorded to be provisional .
in addition , we are still evaluating the gilti provisions of the 2017 tax act and their impact , if any , on our consolidated financial statements as of december 31 , 2017 .
the fasb allows companies to adopt an accounting policy to either recognize deferred taxes for gilti or treat such as a tax cost in the year incurred .
we have not yet determined which accounting policy to adopt because determining the impact of the gilti provisions requires analysis of our existing legal entity structure , the reversal of our u.s .
gaap and u.s .
tax basis differences in the assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries , and our ability to offset any tax with foreign tax credits .
as such , we did not record a deferred income tax .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what would the investment income ( loss ) have been in 2014 without the gain from the sale of the investment in clearwire corporation in 2013?

Pre-table text:
consolidated other income ( expense ) items , net .

Table:
year ended december 31 ( in millions )	2015	2014	2013
interest expense	$ -2702 ( 2702 )	$ -2617 ( 2617 )	$ -2574 ( 2574 )
investment income ( loss ) net	81	296	576
equity in net income ( losses ) of investees net	-325 ( 325 )	97	-86 ( 86 )
other income ( expense ) net	320	-215 ( 215 )	-364 ( 364 )
total	$ -2626 ( 2626 )	$ -2439 ( 2439 )	$ -2448 ( 2448 )

Post-table text:
interest expense interest expense increased in 2015 primarily due to an increase in our debt outstanding and $ 47 million of additional interest expense associated with the early redemption in june 2015 of our $ 750 million aggregate principal amount of 5.85% ( 5.85 % ) senior notes due november 2015 and our $ 1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.90% ( 5.90 % ) senior notes due march 2016 .
interest expense increased in 2014 primarily due to the effect of our interest rate derivative financial instruments .
investment income ( loss ) , net the change in investment income ( loss ) , net in 2015 was primarily due to a $ 154 million gain related to the sale of our shares of arris group common stock in 2014 .
the change in investment income ( loss ) , net in 2014 was primarily due to a $ 443 million gain related to the sale of our investment in clearwire corporation in 2013 .
the components of investment income ( loss ) , net are presented in a table in note 7 to comcast 2019s consolidated financial statements .
equity in net income ( losses ) of investees , net the change in equity in net income ( losses ) of investees , net in 2015 was primarily due to twcc holding corp .
( 201cthe weather channel 201d ) recording impairment charges related to goodwill .
we recorded expenses of $ 333 million in 2015 that represent nbcuniversal 2019s proportionate share of these impairment charges .
the change in 2015 was also due to an increase in our proportionate share of losses in hulu , llc ( 201chulu 201d ) , which were driven by hulu 2019s higher programming and marketing costs .
in 2015 and 2014 , we recognized our pro- portionate share of losses of $ 106 million and $ 20 million , respectively , related to our investment in hulu .
the change in equity in net income ( losses ) of investees , net in 2014 was primarily due to $ 142 million of total equity losses recorded in 2013 attributable to our investment in hulu .
in july 2013 , we entered into an agreement to provide capital contributions totaling $ 247 million to hulu , which we had previously accounted for as a cost method investment .
this represented an agreement to provide our first capital contribution to hulu since we acquired our interest in it as part of our acquisition of a controlling interest in nbcuniversal in 2011 ( the 201cnbcuniversal transaction 201d ) ; therefore , we began to apply the equity method of accounting for this investment .
the change in the method of accounting for this investment required us to recognize our propor- tionate share of hulu 2019s accumulated losses from the date of the nbcuniversal transaction through july 2013 .
other income ( expense ) , net other income ( expense ) , net for 2015 included gains of $ 335 million on the sales of a business and an invest- ment , $ 240 million recorded on the settlement of a contingent consideration liability with general electric company ( 201cge 201d ) related to the acquisition of nbcuniversal , and $ 43 million related to an equity method investment .
these gains were partially offset by $ 236 million of expenses related to fair value adjustments to a contractual obligation .
see note 11 to comcast 2019s consolidated financial statements for additional information on this contractual obligation .
other income ( expense ) , net for 2014 included a $ 27 million favorable settlement of a contingency related to the at&t broadband transaction in 2002 , which was more than offset by $ 208 million of expenses related to 61 comcast 2015 annual report on form 10-k .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
as of december 312012 what was the outstanding amount of share repurchase authorized in billions?

Pre-table text:
during the fourth quarter of 2010 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) guaranteed notes due under this program .
schlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 2.56% ( 2.56 % ) .
during the first quarter of 2009 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) guaranteed notes due 2014 under this program .
schlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us dollar denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) .
0160 on april 17 , 2008 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an $ 8 billion share repurchase program for shares of schlumberger common stock , to be acquired in the open market before december 31 , 2011 .
on july 21 , 2011 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an extension of this repurchase program to december 31 , 2013 .
schlumberger had repurchased $ 7.12 billion of shares under this program as of december 31 , 2012 .
the following table summarizes the activity under this share repurchase program during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 : ( stated in thousands except per share amounts ) total cost of shares purchased total number of shares purchased average price paid per share .

Table:
	total cost of shares purchased	total number of shares purchased	average price paid per share
2012	$ 971883	14087.8	$ 68.99
2011	$ 2997688	36940.4	$ 81.15
2010	$ 1716675	26624.8	$ 64.48

Post-table text:
0160 cash flow provided by operations was $ 6.8 billion in 2012 , $ 6.1 billion in 2011 and $ 5.5 billion in 2010 .
in recent years , schlumberger has actively managed its activity levels in venezuela relative to its accounts receivable balance , and has recently experienced an increased delay in payment from its national oil company customer there .
schlumberger operates in approximately 85 countries .
at december 31 , 2012 , only five of those countries ( including venezuela ) individually accounted for greater than 5% ( 5 % ) of schlumberger 2019s accounts receivable balance of which only one , the united states , represented greater than 10% ( 10 % ) .
0160 dividends paid during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 were $ 1.43 billion , $ 1.30 billion and $ 1.04 billion , respectively .
on january 17 , 2013 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 13.6% ( 13.6 % ) , to $ 0.3125 .
on january 19 , 2012 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 0.275 .
on january 21 , 2011 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 19% ( 19 % ) , to $ 0.25 .
0160 capital expenditures were $ 4.7 billion in 2012 , $ 4.0 billion in 2011 and $ 2.9 billion in 2010 .
capital expenditures are expected to approach $ 3.9 billion for the full year 2013 .
0160 during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 schlumberger made contributions of $ 673 million , $ 601 million and $ 868 million , respectively , to its postretirement benefit plans .
the us pension plans were 82% ( 82 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation .
this compares to 87% ( 87 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 .
schlumberger 2019s international defined benefit pension plans are a combined 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation .
this compares to 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 .
schlumberger currently anticipates contributing approximately $ 650 million to its postretirement benefit plans in 2013 , subject to market and business conditions .
0160 there were $ 321 million outstanding series b debentures at december 31 , 2009 .
during 2010 , the remaining $ 320 million of the 2.125% ( 2.125 % ) series b convertible debentures due june 1 , 2023 were converted by holders into 8.0 million shares of schlumberger common stock and the remaining $ 1 million of outstanding series b debentures were redeemed for cash. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was average propane sales in tbd for the three year period?

Pre-table text:
in 2006 , our board of directors approved a projected $ 3.2 billion expansion of our garyville , louisiana refinery by 180 mbpd to 425 mbpd , which will increase our total refining capacity to 1.154 million barrels per day ( 2018 2018mmbpd 2019 2019 ) .
we recently received air permit approval from the louisiana department of environmental quality for this project and construction is expected to begin in mid-2007 , with startup planned for the fourth quarter of 2009 .
we have also commenced front-end engineering and design ( 2018 2018feed 2019 2019 ) for a potential heavy oil upgrading project at our detroit refinery , which would allow us to process increased volumes of canadian oil sands production , and are undertaking a feasibility study for a similar upgrading project at our catlettsburg refinery .
marketing we are a supplier of gasoline and distillates to resellers and consumers within our market area in the midwest , the upper great plains and southeastern united states .
in 2006 , our refined product sales volumes ( excluding matching buy/sell transactions ) totaled 21.5 billion gallons , or 1.401 mmbpd .
the average sales price of our refined products in aggregate was $ 77.76 per barrel for 2006 .
the following table sets forth our refined product sales by product group and our average sales price for each of the last three years .
refined product sales ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2006 2005 2004 .

Table:
( thousands of barrels per day )	2006	2005	2004
gasoline	804	836	807
distillates	375	385	373
propane	23	22	22
feedstocks and special products	106	96	92
heavy fuel oil	26	29	27
asphalt	91	87	79
total ( a )	1425	1455	1400
average sales price ( $ per barrel )	$ 77.76	$ 66.42	$ 49.53

Post-table text:
( a ) includes matching buy/sell volumes of 24 mbpd , 77 mbpd and 71 mbpd in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .
on april 1 , 2006 , we changed our accounting for matching buy/sell arrangements as a result of a new accounting standard .
this change resulted in lower refined product sales volumes for the remainder of 2006 than would have been reported under the previous accounting practices .
see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements .
the wholesale distribution of petroleum products to private brand marketers and to large commercial and industrial consumers and sales in the spot market accounted for 71 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2006 .
we sold 52 percent of our gasoline volumes and 89 percent of our distillates volumes on a wholesale or spot market basis .
half of our propane is sold into the home heating market , with the balance being purchased by industrial consumers .
propylene , cumene , aromatics , aliphatics , and sulfur are domestically marketed to customers in the chemical industry .
base lube oils , maleic anhydride , slack wax , extract and pitch are sold throughout the united states and canada , with pitch products also being exported worldwide .
we market asphalt through owned and leased terminals throughout the midwest , the upper great plains and southeastern united states .
our customer base includes approximately 800 asphalt-paving contractors , government entities ( states , counties , cities and townships ) and asphalt roofing shingle manufacturers .
we blended 35 mbpd of ethanol into gasoline in 2006 .
in 2005 and 2004 , we blended 35 mbpd and 30 mbpd of ethanol .
the expansion or contraction of our ethanol blending program will be driven by the economics of the ethanol supply and changes in government regulations .
we sell reformulated gasoline in parts of our marketing territory , primarily chicago , illinois ; louisville , kentucky ; northern kentucky ; and milwaukee , wisconsin , and we sell low-vapor-pressure gasoline in nine states .
as of december 31 , 2006 , we supplied petroleum products to about 4200 marathon branded retail outlets located primarily in ohio , michigan , indiana , kentucky and illinois .
branded retail outlets are also located in florida , georgia , minnesota , wisconsin , west virginia , tennessee , virginia , north carolina , pennsylvania , alabama and south carolina .
sales to marathon brand jobbers and dealers accounted for 14 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2006 .
ssa sells gasoline and diesel fuel through company-operated retail outlets .
sales of refined products through these ssa retail outlets accounted for 15 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2006 .
as of december 31 , 2006 , ssa had 1636 retail outlets in nine states that sold petroleum products and convenience store merchandise and services , primarily under the brand names 2018 2018speedway 2019 2019 and 2018 2018superamerica . 2019 2019 ssa 2019s revenues from the sale of non-petroleum merchandise totaled $ 2.7 billion in 2006 , compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2005 .
profit levels from the sale .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
was the change in net revenue from changes in transmission revenue more significant than the change due to the retail electric price change?

Pre-table text:
entergy texas , inc .
and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue .
2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 5.2 million primarily due to the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue and a lower effective tax rate .
net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2015 net revenue	$ 637.2
reserve equalization	14.3
purchased power capacity	12.4
transmission revenue	7.0
retail electric price	5.4
net wholesale	-27.8 ( 27.8 )
other	-4.3 ( 4.3 )
2016 net revenue	$ 644.2

Post-table text:
the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a reduction in reserve equalization expense primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the execution of a new purchased power agreement and entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement , each in november 2015 , and entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement .
the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased expenses due to the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 , as well as capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts .
the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in attachment o rates charged by miso to transmission customers and a settlement of attachment o rates previously billed to transmission customers by miso. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
for 2016 , what was the total african and us net undeveloped acres expiring , in thousands ? \\n

Pre-table text:
in the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future .
if production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years .
we plan to continue the terms of certain of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions ; however , the majority of the undeveloped acres associated with other africa as listed in the table below pertains to our licenses in ethiopia and kenya , for which we executed agreements in 2015 to sell .
the kenya transaction closed in february 2016 and the ethiopia transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2016 .
see item 8 .
financial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about this disposition .
net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 .

Table:
( in thousands )	net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016	net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017	net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2018
u.s .	68	89	128
e.g .	2014	92	36
other africa	189	4352	854
total africa	189	4444	890
other international	2014	2014	2014
total	257	4533	1018

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the change in millions of weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2015 to 2016?

Pre-table text:
of prior service cost or credits , and net actuarial gains or losses ) as part of non-operating income .
we adopted the requirements of asu no .
2017-07 on january 1 , 2018 using the retrospective transition method .
we expect the adoption of asu no .
2017-07 to result in an increase to consolidated operating profit of $ 471 million and $ 846 million for 2016 and 2017 , respectively , and a corresponding decrease in non-operating income for each year .
we do not expect any impact to our business segment operating profit , our consolidated net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting asu no .
2017-07 .
intangibles-goodwill and other in january 2017 , the fasb issued asu no .
2017-04 , intangibles-goodwill and other ( topic 350 ) , which eliminates the requirement to compare the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill ( commonly referred to as step 2 ) from the goodwill impairment test .
the new standard does not change how a goodwill impairment is identified .
wewill continue to perform our quantitative and qualitative goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount , but if we are required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , under the new standard the amount of the charge will be calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s fair value from its carrying amount .
under the prior standard , if we were required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , step 2 required us to calculate the implied value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the amount of the charge was calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s implied fair value of goodwill from its actual goodwill balance .
the new standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2019 , with early adoption permitted , and should be applied prospectively from the date of adoption .
we elected to adopt the new standard for future goodwill impairment tests at the beginning of the third quarter of 2017 , because it significantly simplifies the evaluation of goodwill for impairment .
the impact of the new standard will depend on the outcomes of future goodwill impairment tests .
derivatives and hedging inaugust 2017 , the fasb issuedasu no .
2017-12derivatives and hedging ( topic 815 ) , which eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness .
the guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2018 , with early adoption permitted .
we do not expect a significant impact to our consolidated assets and liabilities , net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting this new standard .
we plan to adopt the new standard january 1 , 2019 .
leases in february 2016 , the fasb issuedasu no .
2016-02 , leases ( topic 842 ) , which requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements for both lessees and lessors .
the new standard is effective january 1 , 2019 for public companies , with early adoption permitted .
the new standard currently requires the application of a modified retrospective approach to the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements .
we are continuing to evaluate the expected impact to our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures .
we plan to adopt the new standard effective january 1 , 2019 .
note 2 2013 earnings per share theweighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common sharewere as follows ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2017	2016	2015
weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations	287.8	299.3	310.3
weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards	2.8	3.8	4.4
weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations	290.6	303.1	314.7

Post-table text:
we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respectiveweighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .
our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method .
there were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .
note 3 2013 acquisitions and divestitures acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation on november 6 , 2015 , we completed the acquisition of sikorsky from united technologies corporation ( utc ) and certain of utc 2019s subsidiaries .
the purchase price of the acquisition was $ 9.0 billion , net of cash acquired .
as a result of the acquisition .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percent change in net revenue between 2006 and 2007?

Pre-table text:
entergy texas , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in power purchases as a result of the purchased power agreements between entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas and an increase in the average market prices of purchased power and natural gas , substantially offset by a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of decreased recovery from customers of fuel costs .
other regulatory charges increased primarily due to an increase of $ 6.9 million in the recovery of bond expenses related to the securitization bonds .
the recovery became effective july 2007 .
see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds .
2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
	amount ( in millions )
2006 net revenue	$ 403.3
purchased power capacity	13.1
securitization transition charge	9.9
volume/weather	9.7
transmission revenue	6.1
base revenue	2.6
other	-2.4 ( 2.4 )
2007 net revenue	$ 442.3

Post-table text:
the purchased power capacity variance is due to changes in the purchased power capacity costs included in the calculation in 2007 compared to 2006 used to bill generation costs between entergy texas and entergy gulf states louisiana .
the securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds .
as discussed above , in june 2007 , egsrf i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds .
see note 5 to the financial statements herein for details of the securitization bond issuance .
the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage on billed retail sales , including the effects of more favorable weather in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 .
the increase is also due to an increase in usage during the unbilled sales period .
retail electricity usage increased a total of 139 gwh in all sectors .
see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues .
the transmission revenue variance is due to an increase in rates effective june 2007 and new transmission customers in late 2006 .
the base revenue variance is due to the transition to competition rider that began in march 2006 .
refer to note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate increase .
gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $ 179 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates and fuel refunds .
the decrease was partially offset by the $ 39 million increase in net revenue described above and an increase of $ 44 million in wholesale revenues , including $ 30 million from the system agreement cost equalization payments from entergy arkansas .
the receipt of such payments is being .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage of total market risk for positions , accounted for at fair value , that are not included in var is comprised of equity in 2016?

Pre-table text:
the goldman sachs group , inc .
and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis sensitivity measures certain portfolios and individual positions are not included in var because var is not the most appropriate risk measure .
other sensitivity measures we use to analyze market risk are described below .
10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity measures .
the table below presents market risk for positions , accounted for at fair value , that are not included in var by asset category. .

Table:
$ in millions	as of december 2017	as of december 2016	as of december 2015
equity	$ 2096	$ 2085	$ 2157
debt	1606	1702	1479
total	$ 3702	$ 3787	$ 3636

Post-table text:
in the table above : 2030 the market risk of these positions is determined by estimating the potential reduction in net revenues of a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in the value of these positions .
2030 equity positions relate to private and restricted public equity securities , including interests in funds that invest in corporate equities and real estate and interests in hedge funds .
2030 debt positions include interests in funds that invest in corporate mezzanine and senior debt instruments , loans backed by commercial and residential real estate , corporate bank loans and other corporate debt , including acquired portfolios of distressed loans .
2030 equity and debt funded positions are included in our consolidated statements of financial condition in financial instruments owned .
see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about cash instruments .
2030 these measures do not reflect the diversification effect across asset categories or across other market risk measures .
credit spread sensitivity on derivatives and financial liabilities .
var excludes the impact of changes in counterparty and our own credit spreads on derivatives , as well as changes in our own credit spreads ( debt valuation adjustment ) on financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected .
the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads ( counterparty and our own ) on derivatives was a gain of $ 3 million and $ 2 million ( including hedges ) as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively .
in addition , the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in our own credit spreads on financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected was a gain of $ 35 million and $ 25 million as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively .
however , the actual net impact of a change in our own credit spreads is also affected by the liquidity , duration and convexity ( as the sensitivity is not linear to changes in yields ) of those financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected , as well as the relative performance of any hedges undertaken .
interest rate sensitivity .
loans receivable as of december 2017 and december 2016 were $ 65.93 billion and $ 49.67 billion , respectively , substantially all of which had floating interest rates .
as of december 2017 and december 2016 , the estimated sensitivity to a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on such loans was $ 527 million and $ 405 million , respectively , of additional interest income over a twelve-month period , which does not take into account the potential impact of an increase in costs to fund such loans .
see note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about loans receivable .
other market risk considerations as of december 2017 and december 2016 , we had commitments and held loans for which we have obtained credit loss protection from sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc .
see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about such lending commitments .
in addition , we make investments in securities that are accounted for as available-for-sale and included in financial instruments owned in the consolidated statements of financial condition .
see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information .
we also make investments accounted for under the equity method and we also make direct investments in real estate , both of which are included in other assets .
direct investments in real estate are accounted for at cost less accumulated depreciation .
see note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about other assets .
goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 93 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
at december 31 , 2017 under the 2010 employee plan what was the percent of shares that had been granted

Pre-table text:
15 .
commitments and contingencies in the ordinary course of business , the company is involved in lawsuits , arbitrations and other formal and informal dispute resolution procedures , the outcomes of which will determine the company 2019s rights and obligations under insurance and reinsurance agreements .
in some disputes , the company seeks to enforce its rights under an agreement or to collect funds owing to it .
in other matters , the company is resisting attempts by others to collect funds or enforce alleged rights .
these disputes arise from time to time and are ultimately resolved through both informal and formal means , including negotiated resolution , arbitration and litigation .
in all such matters , the company believes that its positions are legally and commercially reasonable .
the company considers the statuses of these proceedings when determining its reserves for unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses .
aside from litigation and arbitrations related to these insurance and reinsurance agreements , the company is not a party to any other material litigation or arbitration .
the company has entered into separate annuity agreements with the prudential insurance of america ( 201cthe prudential 201d ) and an additional unaffiliated life insurance company in which the company has either purchased annuity contracts or become the assignee of annuity proceeds that are meant to settle claim payment obligations in the future .
in both instances , the company would become contingently liable if either the prudential or the unaffiliated life insurance company were unable to make payments related to the respective annuity contract .
the table below presents the estimated cost to replace all such annuities for which the company was contingently liable for the periods indicated: .

Table:
( dollars in thousands )	at december 31 , 2017	at december 31 , 2016
the prudential insurance company of america	$ 144618	$ 146507
unaffiliated life insurance company	34444	33860

Post-table text:
16 .
share-based compensation plans the company has a 2010 stock incentive plan ( 201c2010 employee plan 201d ) , a 2009 non-employee director stock option and restricted stock plan ( 201c2009 director plan 201d ) and a 2003 non-employee director equity compensation plan ( 201c2003 director plan 201d ) .
under the 2010 employee plan , 4000000 common shares have been authorized to be granted as non- qualified share options , incentive share options , share appreciation rights , restricted share awards or performance share unit awards to officers and key employees of the company .
at december 31 , 2017 , there were 2553473 remaining shares available to be granted under the 2010 employee plan .
the 2010 employee plan replaced a 2002 employee plan , which replaced a 1995 employee plan ; therefore , no further awards will be granted under the 2002 employee plan or the 1995 employee plan .
through december 31 , 2017 , only non-qualified share options , restricted share awards and performance share unit awards had been granted under the employee plans .
under the 2009 director plan , 37439 common shares have been authorized to be granted as share options or restricted share awards to non-employee directors of the company .
at december 31 , 2017 , there were 34957 remaining shares available to be granted under the 2009 director plan .
the 2009 director plan replaced a 1995 director plan , which expired .
under the 2003 director plan , 500000 common shares have been authorized to be granted as share options or share awards to non-employee directors of the company .
at december 31 , 2017 there were 346714 remaining shares available to be granted under the 2003 director plan. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percentage increase in the net cash provided by operating activities in 2010 compare to 2009?

Pre-table text:
( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 .

Table:
( in millions )	2010	2009	2008
net cash provided by operating activities	$ 3547	$ 3173	$ 4421
net cash used for investing activities	-319 ( 319 )	-1518 ( 1518 )	-907 ( 907 )
net cash used for financing activities	-3363 ( 3363 )	-1476 ( 1476 )	-3938 ( 3938 )

Post-table text:
operating activities net cash provided by operating activities increased by $ 374 million to $ 3547 million in 2010 as compared to 2009 .
the increase primarily was attributable to an improvement in our operating working capital balances of $ 570 million as discussed below , and $ 187 million related to lower net income tax payments , as compared to 2009 .
partially offsetting these improvements was a net reduction in cash from operations of $ 350 million related to our defined benefit pension plan .
this reduction was the result of increased contributions to the pension trust of $ 758 million as compared to 2009 , partially offset by an increase in the cas costs recovered on our contracts .
operating working capital accounts consists of receivables , inventories , accounts payable , and customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred .
the improvement in cash provided by operating working capital was due to a decline in 2010 accounts receivable balances compared to 2009 , and an increase in 2010 customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred balances compared to 2009 .
these improvements partially were offset by a decline in accounts payable balances in 2010 compared to 2009 .
the decline in accounts receivable primarily was due to higher collections on various programs at electronic systems , is&gs , and space systems business areas .
the increase in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred primarily was attributable to an increase on government and commercial satellite programs at space systems and air mobility programs at aeronautics , partially offset by a decrease on various programs at electronic systems .
the decrease in accounts payable was attributable to the timing of accounts payable activities across all segments .
net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $ 1248 million to $ 3173 million in 2009 as compared to 2008 .
the decline primarily was attributable to an increase in our contributions to the defined benefit pension plan of $ 1373 million as compared to 2008 and an increase in our operating working capital accounts of $ 147 million .
partially offsetting these items was the impact of lower net income tax payments in 2009 as compared to 2008 in the amount of $ 319 million .
the decline in cash provided by operating working capital primarily was due to growth of receivables on various programs in the ms2 and gt&l lines of business at electronic systems and an increase in inventories on combat aircraft programs at aeronautics , which partially were offset by increases in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred on government satellite programs at space systems and the timing of accounts payable activities .
investing activities capital expenditures 2013 the majority of our capital expenditures relate to facilities infrastructure and equipment that are incurred to support new and existing programs across all of our business segments .
we also incur capital expenditures for it to support programs and general enterprise it infrastructure .
capital expenditures for property , plant and equipment amounted to $ 820 million in 2010 , $ 852 million in 2009 , and $ 926 million in 2008 .
we expect that our operating cash flows will continue to be sufficient to fund our annual capital expenditures over the next few years .
acquisitions , divestitures and other activities 2013 acquisition activities include both the acquisition of businesses and investments in affiliates .
amounts paid in 2010 of $ 148 million primarily related to investments in affiliates .
we paid $ 435 million in 2009 for acquisition activities , compared with $ 233 million in 2008 .
in 2010 , we received proceeds of $ 798 million from the sale of eig , net of $ 17 million in transaction costs ( see note 2 ) .
there were no material divestiture activities in 2009 and 2008 .
during 2010 , we increased our short-term investments by $ 171 million compared to an increase of $ 279 million in 2009 .
financing activities share activity and dividends 2013 during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , we repurchased 33.0 million , 24.9 million , and 29.0 million shares of our common stock for $ 2483 million , $ 1851 million , and $ 2931 million .
of the shares we repurchased in 2010 , 0.9 million shares for $ 63 million were repurchased in december but settled and were paid for in january 2011 .
in october 2010 , our board of directors approved a new share repurchase program for the repurchase of our common stock from time-to-time , up to an authorized amount of $ 3.0 billion ( see note 12 ) .
under the program , we have discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation .
we repurchased a total of 11.2 million shares under the program for $ 776 million , and as of december 31 , 2010 , there remained $ 2224 million available for additional share repurchases .
in connection with their approval of the new share repurchase program , our board terminated our previous share repurchase program .
cash received from the issuance of our common stock in connection with stock option exercises during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 totaled $ 59 million , $ 40 million , and $ 250 million .
those activities resulted in the issuance of 1.4 million shares , 1.0 million shares , and 4.7 million shares during the respective periods. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage of the company's receivable balances in puerto rico as of december 31 , 2017 was past due?

Pre-table text:
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 was dispatched starting in february 2018 .
aes puerto rico continues to be the lowest cost and epa compliant energy provider in puerto rico .
therefore , we expect aes puerto rico to continue to be a critical supplier to prepa .
starting prior to the hurricanes , prepa has been facing economic challenges that could impact the company , and on july 2 , 2017 , filed for bankruptcy under title iii .
as a result of the bankruptcy filing , aes puerto rico and aes ilumina 2019s non-recourse debt of $ 365 million and $ 36 million , respectively , is in default and has been classified as current as of december 31 , 2017 .
in november 2017 , aes puerto rico signed a forbearance and standstill agreement with its lenders to prevent the lenders from taking any action against the company due to the default events .
this agreement will expire on march 22 , 2018 .
the company's receivable balances in puerto rico as of december 31 , 2017 totaled $ 86 million , of which $ 53 million was overdue .
after the filing of title iii protection , and up until the disruption caused by the hurricanes , aes in puerto rico was collecting the overdue amounts from prepa in line with historic payment patterns .
considering the information available as of the filing date , management believes the carrying amount of our assets in puerto rico of $ 627 million is recoverable as of december 31 , 2017 and no reserve on the receivables is required .
foreign currency risks 2014 aes operates businesses in many foreign countries and such operations could be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates .
fluctuations in currency exchange rate between u.s .
dollar and the following currencies could create significant fluctuations in earnings and cash flows : the argentine peso , the brazilian real , the dominican republic peso , the euro , the chilean peso , the colombian peso , and the philippine peso .
concentrations 2014 due to the geographical diversity of its operations , the company does not have any significant concentration of customers or sources of fuel supply .
several of the company's generation businesses rely on ppas with one or a limited number of customers for the majority of , and in some cases all of , the relevant businesses' output over the term of the ppas .
however , no single customer accounted for 10% ( 10 % ) or more of total revenue in 2017 , 2016 or 2015 .
the cash flows and results of operations of our businesses depend on the credit quality of our customers and the continued ability of our customers and suppliers to meet their obligations under ppas and fuel supply agreements .
if a substantial portion of the company's long-term ppas and/or fuel supply were modified or terminated , the company would be adversely affected to the extent that it would be unable to replace such contracts at equally favorable terms .
26 .
related party transactions certain of our businesses in panama and the dominican republic are partially owned by governments either directly or through state-owned institutions .
in the ordinary course of business , these businesses enter into energy purchase and sale transactions , and transmission agreements with other state-owned institutions which are controlled by such governments .
at two of our generation businesses in mexico , the offtakers exercise significant influence , but not control , through representation on these businesses' boards of directors .
these offtakers are also required to hold a nominal ownership interest in such businesses .
in chile , we provide capacity and energy under contractual arrangements to our investment which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting .
additionally , the company provides certain support and management services to several of its affiliates under various agreements .
the company's consolidated statements of operations included the following transactions with related parties for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

Table:
years ended december 31,	2017	2016	2015
revenue 2014non-regulated	$ 1297	$ 1100	$ 1099
cost of sales 2014non-regulated	220	210	330
interest income	8	4	25
interest expense	36	39	33

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what portion of the equity compensation plan approved by security holders is to be issued upon the exercise of options warrants and rights?

Pre-table text:
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2017 .
equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 448859 $ 0.00 4087587 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 .

Table:
plan category	number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )	weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights	number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )
equity compensation plans approved by security holders	448859	$ 0.00	4087587
equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 )	2014	2014	2014
total	448859	$ 0.00	4087587

Post-table text:
( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc .
2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc .
2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation .
of these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan .
in addition , this number includes 28763 stock rights , 3075 restricted stock rights , and 389898 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement .
( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders .
item 13 .
certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year .
item 14 .
principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}