[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
considering the year 2009 , what is the percentage of the segment's operating income among the total operating income?

Pre-table text:
of exiting a business in japan , economic weakness in asia and political unrest in thailand , partially offset by growth in new zealand and certain emerging markets .
reinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue increased 48% ( 48 % ) , due mainly to the benfield merger , partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency translation .
organic revenue is even with 2008 , as growth in domestic treaty business and slightly higher pricing was offset by greater client retention , and declines in investment banking and facultative placements .
operating income operating income increased $ 54 million or 6% ( 6 % ) from 2008 to $ 900 million in 2009 .
in 2009 , operating income margins in this segment were 14.3% ( 14.3 % ) , up 60 basis points from 13.7% ( 13.7 % ) in 2008 .
contributing to increased operating income and margins were the merger with benfield , lower e&o costs due to insurance recoveries , a pension curtailment gain of $ 54 million in 2009 versus a curtailment loss of $ 6 million in 2008 , declines in anti-corruption and compliance initiative costs of $ 35 million , restructuring savings , and other cost savings initiatives .
these items were partially offset by an increase of $ 140 million in restructuring costs , $ 95 million of lower fiduciary investment income , benfield integration costs and higher amortization of intangible assets obtained in the merger , and unfavorable foreign currency translation .
consulting .

Table:
years ended december 31,	2009	2008	2007
segment revenue	$ 1267	$ 1356	$ 1345
segment operating income	203	208	180
segment operating income margin	16.0% ( 16.0 % )	15.3% ( 15.3 % )	13.4% ( 13.4 % )

Post-table text:
our consulting segment generated 17% ( 17 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2009 and provides a broad range of human capital consulting services , as follows : consulting services : 1 .
health and benefits advises clients about how to structure , fund , and administer employee benefit programs that attract , retain , and motivate employees .
benefits consulting include health and welfare , executive benefits , workforce strategies and productivity , absence management , benefits administration , data-driven health , compliance , employee commitment , investment advisory and elective benefits services .
2 .
retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , investment consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration .
3 .
compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries .
4 .
strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management .
outsourcing offers employment processing , performance improvement , benefits administration and other employment-related services .
beginning in late 2008 and continuing throughout 2009 , the disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets has created significant uncertainty in the marketplace .
the prolonged economic downturn is adversely impacting our clients 2019 financial condition and the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate .
while we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and depressing the price of those services , which is having an adverse effect on our new business and results of operations. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock for the period ended december 30 , 2006?

Pre-table text:
the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc .
nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc .
all rights reserved .
www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .

Table:
	december 29 2001	december 28 2002	january 3 2004	january 1 2005	december 31 2005	december 30 2006
cadence design systems inc .	100.00	54.38	81.52	61.65	75.54	79.96
s & p 500	100.00	77.90	100.24	111.15	116.61	135.03
nasdaq composite	100.00	71.97	107.18	117.07	120.50	137.02
s & p information technology	100.00	62.59	92.14	94.50	95.44	103.47

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percent change in minimum annual rental payment between 2010 and 2011?

Pre-table text:
alexion pharmaceuticals , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , five month period ended december 31 , 2005 , and year ended july 31 , 2005 ( amounts in thousands , except share and per share amounts ) aggregate future minimum annual rental payments for the next five years and thereafter under non-cancellable operating leases ( including facilities and equipment ) as of december 31 , 2007 are: .

Table:
2008	$ 4935
2009	3144
2010	3160
2011	3200
2012	2768
thereafter	9934

Post-table text:
9 .
commitments and contingencies legal proceedings on march 16 , 2007 , pdl biopharma , inc. , or pdl , filed a civil action against alexion in the u.s .
district court for the district of delaware .
pdl claims willful infringement by alexion of pdl patents due to sales of soliris .
pdl seeks unspecified damages , but no less than a reasonable royalty , plus attorney 2019s fees .
alexion has denied pdl's claims .
in addition , we filed counterclaims seeking declarations of non-infringement and invalidity of certain u.s .
patents held by pdl .
alexion believes it has good and valid defenses to pdl's claims and intends to vigorously defend the case and pursue its counterclaims .
on february 4 , 2008 , sb2 , inc .
filed a civil action against alexion in the united states district court for the northern district of california .
sb2 , inc .
claims willfull infringement by alexion of sb2 , inc .
patents due to sales of soliris .
sb2 , inc .
seeks unspecified monetary damages , equitable relief and attorneys fees .
alexion believes it has good and valid defenses to sb2's claims and intends to vigorously defend the case and pursue its counterclaims .
the results of such civil actions cannot be predicted with certainty due to their early stages .
however , depending on the outcome of these legal matters , the operating results of the company could be materially impacted through adjustments to cost of sales ( see notes 2 , 6 and 15 for additional information related to royalties ) .
product supply the large-scale product supply agreement dated december 18 , 2002 , or the lonza agreement , between lonza sales ag , or lonza , and us , relating to the manufacture of soliris , was amended in june 2007 .
we amended our supply agreement to provide for additional purchase commitments of soliris of $ 30000 to $ 35000 through 2013 .
such commitments may only be cancelled in limited circumstances. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits from 2015 to 2016?

Pre-table text:
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

Table:
december 31,	2016	2015	2014
balance at january 1	$ 373	$ 394	$ 392
additions for current year tax positions	8	7	7
additions for tax positions of prior years	1	12	14
reductions for tax positions of prior years	-1 ( 1 )	-7 ( 7 )	-2 ( 2 )
effects of foreign currency translation	2	-7 ( 7 )	-3 ( 3 )
settlements	-13 ( 13 )	-19 ( 19 )	-2 ( 2 )
lapse of statute of limitations	-1 ( 1 )	-7 ( 7 )	-12 ( 12 )
balance at december 31	$ 369	$ 373	$ 394

Post-table text:
the company and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years .
the company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit recorded .
while it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position , we believe we have appropriately accrued for our uncertain tax benefits .
however , audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty .
it is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may exceed our provision for current unrecognized tax benefits in amounts that could be material , but cannot be estimated as of december 31 , 2016 .
our effective tax rate and net income in any given future period could therefore be materially impacted .
22 .
discontinued operations brazil distribution 2014 due to a portfolio evaluation in the first half of 2016 , management has decided to pursue a strategic shift of its distribution companies in brazil , aes sul and eletropaulo .
the disposal of sul was completed in october 2016 .
in december 2016 , eletropaulo underwent a corporate restructuring which is expected to , among other things , provide more liquidity of its shares .
aes is continuing to pursue strategic options for eletropaulo in order to complete its strategic shift to reduce aes 2019 exposure to the brazilian distribution business , including preparation for listing its shares into the novo mercado , which is a listing segment of the brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance .
the company executed an agreement for the sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary aes sul in june 2016 .
we have reported the results of operations and financial position of aes sul as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented .
upon meeting the held-for-sale criteria , the company recognized an after tax loss of $ 382 million comprised of a pretax impairment charge of $ 783 million , offset by a tax benefit of $ 266 million related to the impairment of the sul long lived assets and a tax benefit of $ 135 million for deferred taxes related to the investment in aes sul .
prior to the impairment charge in the second quarter , the carrying value of the aes sul asset group of $ 1.6 billion was greater than its approximate fair value less costs to sell .
however , the impairment charge was limited to the carrying value of the long lived assets of the aes sul disposal group .
on october 31 , 2016 , the company completed the sale of aes sul and received final proceeds less costs to sell of $ 484 million , excluding contingent consideration .
upon disposal of aes sul , we incurred an additional after- tax loss on sale of $ 737 million .
the cumulative impact to earnings of the impairment and loss on sale was $ 1.1 billion .
this includes the reclassification of approximately $ 1 billion of cumulative translation losses , resulting in a net reduction to the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity of $ 92 million .
sul 2019s pretax loss attributable to aes for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 1.4 billion and $ 32 million , respectively .
sul 2019s pretax gain attributable to aes for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 133 million .
prior to its classification as discontinued operations , sul was reported in the brazil sbu reportable segment .
as discussed in note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies , effective july 1 , 2014 , the company prospectively adopted asu no .
2014-08 .
discontinued operations prior to adoption of asu no .
2014-08 include the results of cameroon , saurashtra and various u.s .
wind projects which were each sold in the first half of cameroon 2014 in september 2013 , the company executed agreements for the sale of its 56% ( 56 % ) equity interests in businesses in cameroon : sonel , an integrated utility , kribi , a gas and light fuel oil plant , and dibamba , a heavy .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the average potential anti-dilutive share conversions from 2008 to 2010

Pre-table text:
n o t e s t o t h e c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s 2013 ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries excluded from adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding and assumed conversions is the impact of securities that would have been anti-dilutive during the respective years .
for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , the potential anti-dilutive share conversions were 256868 shares , 1230881 shares , and 638401 shares , respectively .
19 .
related party transactions the ace foundation 2013 bermuda is an unconsolidated not-for-profit organization whose primary purpose is to fund charitable causes in bermuda .
the trustees are principally comprised of ace management .
the company maintains a non-interest bear- ing demand note receivable from the ace foundation 2013 bermuda , the balance of which was $ 30 million and $ 31 million , at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .
the receivable is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .
the borrower has used the related proceeds to finance investments in bermuda real estate , some of which have been rented to ace employees at rates established by independent , professional real estate appraisers .
the borrower uses income from the investments to both repay the note and to fund charitable activities .
accordingly , the company reports the demand note at the lower of its principal value or the fair value of assets held by the borrower to repay the loan , including the real estate properties .
20 .
statutory financial information the company 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are subject to insurance laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which they operate .
these regulations include restrictions that limit the amount of dividends or other distributions , such as loans or cash advances , available to shareholders without prior approval of the insurance regulatory authorities .
there are no statutory restrictions on the payment of dividends from retained earnings by any of the bermuda subsidiaries as the minimum statutory capital and surplus requirements are satisfied by the share capital and additional paid-in capital of each of the bermuda subsidiaries .
the company 2019s u.s .
subsidiaries file financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulators .
statutory accounting differs from gaap in the reporting of certain reinsurance contracts , investments , subsidiaries , acquis- ition expenses , fixed assets , deferred income taxes , and certain other items .
the statutory capital and surplus of the u.s .
subsidiaries met regulatory requirements for 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 .
the amount of dividends available to be paid in 2011 , without prior approval from the state insurance departments , totals $ 850 million .
the following table presents the combined statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income of the bermuda and u.s .
subsidiaries at and for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008. .

Table:
( in millions of u.s . dollars )	bermuda subsidiaries 2010	bermuda subsidiaries 2009	bermuda subsidiaries 2008	bermuda subsidiaries 2010	bermuda subsidiaries 2009	2008
statutory capital and surplus	$ 11798	$ 9164	$ 6205	$ 6266	$ 5885	$ 5368
statutory net income	$ 2430	$ 2369	$ 2196	$ 1047	$ 904	$ 818

Post-table text:
as permitted by the restructuring discussed previously in note 7 , certain of the company 2019s u.s .
subsidiaries discount certain a&e liabilities , which increased statutory capital and surplus by approximately $ 206 million , $ 215 million , and $ 211 million at december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , respectively .
the company 2019s international subsidiaries prepare statutory financial statements based on local laws and regulations .
some jurisdictions impose complex regulatory requirements on insurance companies while other jurisdictions impose fewer requirements .
in some countries , the company must obtain licenses issued by governmental authorities to conduct local insurance business .
these licenses may be subject to reserves and minimum capital and solvency tests .
jurisdictions may impose fines , censure , and/or criminal sanctions for violation of regulatory requirements. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the change in rent expenses between 2011 and 2012?

Pre-table text:
at december 31 , 2012 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operat- ing leases and purchase obligations were as follows: .

Table:
in millions	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	thereafter
lease obligations	$ 198	$ 136	$ 106	$ 70	$ 50	$ 141
purchase obligations ( a )	3213	828	722	620	808	2654
total	$ 3411	$ 964	$ 828	$ 690	$ 858	$ 2795

Post-table text:
( a ) includes $ 3.6 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the company 2019s 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquis- ition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business .
rent expense was $ 231 million , $ 205 million and $ 210 million for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively .
guarantees in connection with sales of businesses , property , equipment , forestlands and other assets , interna- tional paper commonly makes representations and warranties relating to such businesses or assets , and may agree to indemnify buyers with respect to tax and environmental liabilities , breaches of representations and warranties , and other matters .
where liabilities for such matters are determined to be probable and subject to reasonable estimation , accrued liabilities are recorded at the time of sale as a cost of the transaction .
environmental proceedings international paper has been named as a potentially responsible party in environmental remediation actions under various federal and state laws , includ- ing the comprehensive environmental response , compensation and liability act ( cercla ) .
many of these proceedings involve the cleanup of hazardous substances at large commercial landfills that received waste from many different sources .
while joint and several liability is authorized under cercla and equivalent state laws , as a practical matter , liability for cercla cleanups is typically allocated among the many potential responsible parties .
remedial costs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they become probable and reasonably estimable .
international paper has estimated the probable liability associated with these matters to be approximately $ 92 million in the aggregate at december 31 , 2012 .
one of the matters referenced above is a closed wood treating facility located in cass lake , minneso- ta .
during 2009 , in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cercla , international paper submitted to the epa a site remediation feasi- bility study .
in june 2011 , the epa selected and published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $ 46 million .
the overall remediation reserve for the site is currently $ 48 mil- lion to address this selection of an alternative for the soil remediation component of the overall site remedy .
in october 2011 , the epa released a public statement indicating that the final soil remedy deci- sion would be delayed .
in the unlikely event that the epa changes its proposed soil remedy and approves instead a more expensive clean-up alternative , the remediation costs could be material , and sig- nificantly higher than amounts currently recorded .
in october 2012 , the natural resource trustees for this site provided notice to international paper and other potentially responsible parties of their intent to per- form a natural resource damage assessment .
it is premature to predict the outcome of the assessment or to estimate a loss or range of loss , if any , which may be incurred .
in addition to the above matters , other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current , closed or formerly-owned facilities , and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet , totaled approximately $ 46 million at december 31 , 2012 .
other than as described above , completion of required remedial actions is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements .
the company is a potentially responsible party with respect to the allied paper , inc./portage creek/ kalamazoo river superfund site ( kalamazoo river superfund site ) in michigan .
the epa asserts that the site is contaminated primarily by pcbs as a result of discharges from various paper mills located along the river , including a paper mill formerly owned by st .
regis .
the company is a successor in interest to st .
regis .
international paper has not received any orders from the epa with respect to the site and is in the process of collecting information from the epa and other parties relative to the kalamazoo river superfund site to evaluate the extent of its liability , if any , with respect to the site .
accordingly , it is pre- mature to estimate a loss or range of loss with respect to this site .
also in connection with the kalamazoo river superfund site , the company was named as a defendant by georgia-pacific consumer products lp , fort james corporation and georgia pacific llc in a contribution and cost recovery action for alleged pollution at the kalamazoo river super- fund site .
the suit seeks contribution under cercla for $ 79 million in costs purportedly expended by plaintiffs as of the filing of the com- plaint , and for future remediation costs .
the suit alleges that a mill , during the time it was allegedly owned and operated by st .
regis , discharged pcb contaminated solids and paper residuals resulting from paper de-inking and recycling .
also named as defendants in the suit are ncr corporation and weyerhaeuser company .
in mid-2011 , the suit was .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the percentage change in credit net from 2016 to 2017?

Pre-table text:
the goldman sachs group , inc .
and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements in the tables above : 2030 the gross fair values exclude the effects of both counterparty netting and collateral netting , and therefore are not representative of the firm 2019s exposure .
2030 counterparty netting is reflected in each level to the extent that receivable and payable balances are netted within the same level and is included in counterparty netting in levels .
where the counterparty netting is across levels , the netting is included in cross-level counterparty netting .
2030 derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts .
significant unobservable inputs the table below presents the amount of level 3 assets ( liabilities ) , and ranges , averages and medians of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm 2019s level 3 derivatives .
level 3 assets ( liabilities ) and range of significant unobservable inputs ( average/median ) as of december $ in millions 2017 2016 .

Table:
$ in millions	level 3 assets ( liabilities ) and range of significant unobservable inputs ( average/median ) as of december 2017	level 3 assets ( liabilities ) and range of significant unobservable inputs ( average/median ) as of december 2016
interest rates net	$ -410 ( 410 )	$ -381 ( 381 )
correlation	( 10 ) % (  % ) to 95% ( 95 % ) ( 71%/79% ( 71%/79 % ) )	( 10 ) % (  % ) to 86% ( 86 % ) ( 56%/60% ( 56%/60 % ) )
volatility ( bps )	31 to 150 ( 84/78 )	31 to 151 ( 84/57 )
credit net	$ 1505	$ 2504
correlation	28% ( 28 % ) to 84% ( 84 % ) ( 61%/60% ( 61%/60 % ) )	35% ( 35 % ) to 91% ( 91 % ) ( 65%/68% ( 65%/68 % ) )
credit spreads ( bps )	1 to 633 ( 69/42 )	1 to 993 ( 122/73 )
upfront credit points	0 to 97 ( 42/38 )	0 to 100 ( 43/35 )
recovery rates	22% ( 22 % ) to 73% ( 73 % ) ( 68%/73% ( 68%/73 % ) )	1% ( 1 % ) to 97% ( 97 % ) ( 58%/70% ( 58%/70 % ) )
currencies net	$ -181 ( 181 )	$ 3
correlation	49% ( 49 % ) to 72% ( 72 % ) ( 61%/62% ( 61%/62 % ) )	25% ( 25 % ) to 70% ( 70 % ) ( 50%/55% ( 50%/55 % ) )
commodities net	$ 47	$ 73
volatility	9% ( 9 % ) to 79% ( 79 % ) ( 24%/24% ( 24%/24 % ) )	13% ( 13 % ) to 68% ( 68 % ) ( 33%/33% ( 33%/33 % ) )
natural gas spread	$ ( 2.38 ) to $ 3.34 ( $ ( 0.22 ) /$ ( 0.12 ) )	$ ( 1.81 ) to $ 4.33 ( $ ( 0.14 ) /$ ( 0.05 ) )
oil spread	$ ( 2.86 ) to $ 23.61 ( $ 6.47/$ 2.35 )	$ ( 19.72 ) to $ 64.92 ( $ 25.30/$ 16.43 )
equities net	$ -1249 ( 1249 )	$ -3416 ( 3416 )
correlation	( 36 ) % (  % ) to 94% ( 94 % ) ( 50%/52% ( 50%/52 % ) )	( 39 ) % (  % ) to 88% ( 88 % ) ( 41%/41% ( 41%/41 % ) )
volatility	4% ( 4 % ) to 72% ( 72 % ) ( 24%/22% ( 24%/22 % ) )	5% ( 5 % ) to 72% ( 72 % ) ( 24%/23% ( 24%/23 % ) )

Post-table text:
in the table above : 2030 derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts .
2030 ranges represent the significant unobservable inputs that were used in the valuation of each type of derivative .
2030 averages represent the arithmetic average of the inputs and are not weighted by the relative fair value or notional of the respective financial instruments .
an average greater than the median indicates that the majority of inputs are below the average .
for example , the difference between the average and the median for credit spreads and oil spread inputs indicates that the majority of the inputs fall in the lower end of the range .
2030 the ranges , averages and medians of these inputs are not representative of the appropriate inputs to use when calculating the fair value of any one derivative .
for example , the highest correlation for interest rate derivatives is appropriate for valuing a specific interest rate derivative but may not be appropriate for valuing any other interest rate derivative .
accordingly , the ranges of inputs do not represent uncertainty in , or possible ranges of , fair value measurements of the firm 2019s level 3 derivatives .
2030 interest rates , currencies and equities derivatives are valued using option pricing models , credit derivatives are valued using option pricing , correlation and discounted cash flow models , and commodities derivatives are valued using option pricing and discounted cash flow models .
2030 the fair value of any one instrument may be determined using multiple valuation techniques .
for example , option pricing models and discounted cash flows models are typically used together to determine fair value .
therefore , the level 3 balance encompasses both of these techniques .
2030 correlation within currencies and equities includes cross- product type correlation .
2030 natural gas spread represents the spread per million british thermal units of natural gas .
2030 oil spread represents the spread per barrel of oil and refined products .
range of significant unobservable inputs the following is information about the ranges of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm 2019s level 3 derivative instruments : 2030 correlation .
ranges for correlation cover a variety of underliers both within one product type ( e.g. , equity index and equity single stock names ) and across product types ( e.g. , correlation of an interest rate and a currency ) , as well as across regions .
generally , cross-product type correlation inputs are used to value more complex instruments and are lower than correlation inputs on assets within the same derivative product type .
2030 volatility .
ranges for volatility cover numerous underliers across a variety of markets , maturities and strike prices .
for example , volatility of equity indices is generally lower than volatility of single stocks .
2030 credit spreads , upfront credit points and recovery rates .
the ranges for credit spreads , upfront credit points and recovery rates cover a variety of underliers ( index and single names ) , regions , sectors , maturities and credit qualities ( high-yield and investment-grade ) .
the broad range of this population gives rise to the width of the ranges of significant unobservable inputs .
130 goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
considering the reverse stock split , what was the percentual reduction of the common stock outstanding shares?

Pre-table text:
part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities .
the company 2019s common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange .
prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company , the company 2019s common stock traded under the symbol 201caa . 201d in connection with the separation , on november 1 , 2016 , the company changed its stock symbol and its common stock began trading under the symbol 201carnc . 201d on october 5 , 2016 , the company 2019s common shareholders approved a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of the company 2019s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock ( the 201creverse stock split 201d ) .
as a result of the reverse stock split , every three shares of issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one issued and outstanding share of common stock , without any change in the par value per share .
the reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares , and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares .
the company 2019s common stock began trading on a reverse stock split-adjusted basis on october 6 , 2016 .
on november 1 , 2016 , the company completed the separation of its business into two independent , publicly traded companies : the company and alcoa corporation .
the separation was effected by means of a pro rata distribution by the company of 80.1% ( 80.1 % ) of the outstanding shares of alcoa corporation common stock to the company 2019s shareholders .
the company 2019s shareholders of record as of the close of business on october 20 , 2016 ( the 201crecord date 201d ) received one share of alcoa corporation common stock for every three shares of the company 2019s common stock held as of the record date .
the company retained 19.9% ( 19.9 % ) of the outstanding common stock of alcoa corporation immediately following the separation .
see disposition of retained shares in note c to the consolidated financial statements in part ii item 8 of this form 10-k .
the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 .
the prices listed below for those dates prior to november 1 , 2016 reflect stock trading prices of alcoa inc .
prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , and therefore are not comparable to the company 2019s post-separation prices. .

Table:
quarter	2017 high	2017 low	2017 dividend	2017 high	2017 low	dividend
first	$ 30.69	$ 18.64	$ 0.06	$ 30.66	$ 18.42	$ 0.09
second	28.65	21.76	0.06	34.50	26.34	0.09
third	26.84	22.67	0.06	32.91	27.09	0.09
fourth ( separation occurred on november 1 2016 )	27.85	22.74	0.06	32.10	16.75	0.09
year	$ 30.69	$ 18.64	$ 0.24	$ 34.50	$ 16.75	$ 0.36

Post-table text:
the number of holders of record of common stock was approximately 12271 as of february 16 , 2018. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
as of december 312019 what was the percentage of restricted cash that was proceeds from the issuance of tax-exempt bonds

Pre-table text:
in our primary disbursement accounts which were reclassified as accounts payable and other accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .
concentration of credit risk financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents , trade accounts receivable and derivative instruments .
we place our cash and cash equivalents with high quality financial institutions .
such balances may be in excess of fdic insured limits .
in order to manage the related credit exposure , we continually monitor the credit worthiness of the financial institutions where we have deposits .
concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable are limited due to the wide variety of customers and markets in which we provide services , as well as the dispersion of our operations across many geographic areas .
we provide services to commercial , industrial , municipal and residential customers in the united states and puerto rico .
we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers , but do not require collateral to support customer receivables .
we establish an allowance for doubtful accounts based on various factors including the credit risk of specific customers , age of receivables outstanding , historical trends , economic conditions and other information .
no customer exceeded 5% ( 5 % ) of our outstanding accounts receivable balance at december 31 , 2009 or 2008 .
accounts receivable , net of allowance for doubtful accounts accounts receivable represent receivables from customers for collection , transfer , recycling , disposal and other services .
our receivables are recorded when billed or when the related revenue is earned , if earlier , and represent claims against third parties that will be settled in cash .
the carrying value of our receivables , net of the allowance for doubtful accounts , represents their estimated net realizable value .
provisions for doubtful accounts are evaluated on a monthly basis and are recorded based on our historical collection experience , the age of the receivables , specific customer information and economic conditions .
we also review outstanding balances on an account-specific basis .
in general , reserves are provided for accounts receivable in excess of ninety days old .
past due receivable balances are written-off when our collection efforts have been unsuccess- ful in collecting amounts due .
the following table reflects the activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007: .

Table:
	2009	2008	2007
balance at beginning of year	$ 65.7	$ 14.7	$ 18.8
additions charged to expense	27.3	36.5	3.9
accounts written-off	-37.8 ( 37.8 )	-12.7 ( 12.7 )	-7.8 ( 7.8 )
acquisitions	-	27.2	-0.2 ( 0.2 )
balance at end of year	$ 55.2	$ 65.7	$ 14.7

Post-table text:
subsequent to our acquisition of allied , we recorded a provision for doubtful accounts of $ 14.2 million to adjust the allowance acquired from allied to conform to republic 2019s accounting policies .
we also recorded $ 5.4 million to provide for specific bankruptcy exposures in 2008 .
in 2007 , we recorded a $ 4.3 million reduction in our allowance for doubtful accounts as a result of refining our estimate of the allowance based on our historical collection experience .
restricted cash as of december 31 , 2009 , we had $ 236.6 million of restricted cash , of which $ 93.1 million was proceeds from the issuance of tax-exempt bonds and other tax-exempt financings and will be used to fund capital republic services , inc .
and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the carrying value of notes due by 2017 ? in millions $ .

Pre-table text:
long-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2013 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value .

Table:
( in millions )	maturity amount	unamortized discount	carrying value	fair value
3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2014	$ 1000	$ 2014	$ 1000	$ 1029
1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015	750	2014	750	759
6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017	700	-2 ( 2 )	698	812
5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019	1000	-2 ( 2 )	998	1140
4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021	750	-3 ( 3 )	747	799
3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022	750	-4 ( 4 )	746	745
total long-term borrowings	$ 4950	$ -11 ( 11 )	$ 4939	$ 5284

Post-table text:
long-term borrowings at december 31 , 2012 had a carrying value of $ 5.687 billion and a fair value of $ 6.275 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2012 .
2015 and 2022 notes .
in may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .
net proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .
interest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .
the 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
the 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .
the 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
2013 and 2021 notes .
in may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .
net proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .
( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) .
interest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year .
the 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
the 2021 notes were issued at a discount of $ 4 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs for the $ 1.5 billion note issuances , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
in may 2011 , in conjunction with the issuance of the 2013 floating rate notes , the company entered into a $ 750 million notional interest rate swap maturing in 2013 to hedge the future cash flows of its obligation at a fixed rate of 1.03% ( 1.03 % ) .
during the second quarter of 2013 , the interest rate swap matured and the 2013 floating rate notes were fully repaid .
2012 , 2014 and 2019 notes .
in december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations .
these notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2014 and 2019 , respectively .
net proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors ( 201cbgi 201d ) from barclays on december 1 , 2009 ( the 201cbgi transaction 201d ) , and for general corporate purposes .
interest on the 2014 notes and 2019 notes of approximately $ 35 million and $ 50 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year .
these notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .
these notes were issued collectively at a discount of $ 5 million , which is being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .
the company incurred approximately $ 13 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of these notes .
at december 31 , 2013 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .
2017 notes .
in september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) .
a portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund of funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes .
interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year .
the 2017 notes may be redeemed prior .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the roi of an investment in s&p500 index from 2006 to january 3 , 2009?

Pre-table text:
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index .
the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .
the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .
comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 .

Table:
company/index	december 30 2006	december 29 2007	january 3 2009	january 2 2010	january 1 2011	december 31 2011
advance auto parts	$ 100.00	$ 108.00	$ 97.26	$ 116.01	$ 190.41	$ 201.18
s&p 500 index	100.00	104.24	65.70	78.62	88.67	88.67
s&p retail index	100.00	82.15	58.29	82.36	101.84	104.81

Post-table text:
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index .
the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .
the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .
comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the fair value of hologic common stock used to acquire suros?

Pre-table text:
hologic , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) acquisition and the adjustments did not have a material impact on the company 2019s financial position or results of operation .
there have no other material changes to the purchase price allocation as disclosed in the company 2019s form 10-k for the year ended september 30 , 2006 .
as part of the purchase price allocation , all intangible assets that were a part of the acquisition were identified and valued .
it was determined that only customer relationship , trade name , developed technology and know how and in-process research and development had separately identifiable values .
customer relationship represents r2 2019s strong active customer base , dominant market position and strong partnership with several large companies .
trade name represents the r2 product names that the company intends to continue to use .
order backlog consists of customer orders for which revenue has not yet been recognized .
developed technology and know how represents currently marketable purchased products that the company continues to resell as well as utilize to enhance and incorporate into the company 2019s existing products .
the estimated $ 10200 of purchase price allocated to in-process research and development projects primarily related to r2 2019s digital cad products .
the projects added direct digital algorithm capabilities as well as a new platform technology to analyze images and breast density measurement .
the projects were substantially completed as planned in fiscal 2007 .
the deferred income tax asset relates to the tax effect of acquired net operating loss carry forwards that the company believes are realizable partially offset by acquired identifiable intangible assets , and fair value adjustments to acquired inventory as such amounts are not deductible for tax purposes .
acquisition of suros surgical systems , inc .
on july 27 , 2006 , the company completed the acquisition of suros surgical systems , inc .
( suros ) , pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger dated april 17 , 2006 .
the results of operations for suros have been included in the company 2019s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition as part of its mammography/breast care business segment .
suros , located in indianapolis , indiana , develops , manufactures and sells minimally invasive interventional breast biopsy technology and products for biopsy , tissue removal and biopsy site marking .
the initial aggregate purchase price for suros of approximately $ 248100 ( subject to adjustment ) consisted of 2300 shares of hologic common stock valued at $ 106500 , cash paid of $ 139000 , and approximately $ 2600 for acquisition related fees and expenses .
the company determined the fair value of the shares issued in connection with the acquisition in accordance with eitf issue no .
99-12 , determination of the measurement date for the market price of acquirer securities issued in a purchase business combination .
the components and allocation of the purchase price , consists of the following approximate amounts: .

Table:
net tangible assets acquired as of july 27 2006	$ 11800
in-process research and development	4900
developed technology and know how	46000
customer relationship	17900
trade name	5800
deferred income taxes	-21300 ( 21300 )
goodwill	202000
estimated purchase price	$ 267100

Post-table text:
the acquisition also provides for a two-year earn out .
the earn-out is payable in two annual cash installments equal to the incremental revenue growth in suros 2019 business in the two years following the closing. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2008 to 2009?

Pre-table text:
the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

Table:
2011	$ 62465
2012	54236
2013	47860
2014	37660
2015	28622
thereafter	79800
future minimum lease payments	$ 310643

Post-table text:
rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations .
typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods .
we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property .
lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases .
the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost .
in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall .
similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value .
had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million .
we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value .
litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s .
infringed on ford design patents .
the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 .
pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s .
of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s .
design patent .
we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell .
the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income .
we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business .
we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the average change in unrealized gains on derivative instruments?

Pre-table text:
table of contents notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 6 2014shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) the following table summarizes activity in other comprehensive income related to derivatives , net of taxes , held by the company during the three fiscal years ended september 27 , 2008 ( in millions ) : the tax effect related to the changes in fair value of derivatives was $ ( 5 ) million , $ 1 million , and $ ( 8 ) million for 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 , respectively .
the tax effect related to derivative gains/losses reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income was $ ( 9 ) million , $ 2 million , and $ 8 million for 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 , respectively .
employee benefit plans 2003 employee stock plan the 2003 employee stock plan ( the 201c2003 plan 201d ) is a shareholder approved plan that provides for broad-based grants to employees , including executive officers .
based on the terms of individual option grants , options granted under the 2003 plan generally expire 7 to 10 years after the grant date and generally become exercisable over a period of four years , based on continued employment , with either annual or quarterly vesting .
the 2003 plan permits the granting of incentive stock options , nonstatutory stock options , rsus , stock appreciation rights , stock purchase rights and performance-based awards .
as of september 27 , 2008 , approximately 50.3 million shares were reserved for future issuance under the 2003 1997 employee stock option plan in august 1997 , the company 2019s board of directors approved the 1997 employee stock option plan ( the 201c1997 plan 201d ) , a non-shareholder approved plan for grants of stock options to employees who are not officers of the company .
based on the terms of individual option grants , options granted under the 1997 plan generally expire 7 to 10 years after the grant date and generally become exercisable over a period of four years , based on continued employment , with either annual or quarterly vesting .
in october 2003 , the company terminated the 1997 plan and no new options can be granted from this plan .
1997 director stock option plan in august 1997 , the company 2019s board of directors adopted a director stock option plan ( the 201cdirector plan 201d ) for non-employee directors of the company , which was approved by shareholders in 1998 .
pursuant to the director plan , the company 2019s non-employee directors are granted an option to acquire 30000 shares of common stock upon their initial election to the board ( 201cinitial options 201d ) .
the initial options vest and become exercisable in three equal annual installments on each of the first through third anniversaries of the grant date .
on the fourth anniversary of a non-employee director 2019s initial election to the board and on each subsequent anniversary thereafter , the director will be entitled to receive an option to acquire 10000 shares of common stock ( 201cannual options 201d ) .
annual options are fully vested and immediately exercisable on their date of grant .
options granted under the director plan expire 10 years after the grant date .
as of september 27 , 2008 , approximately 290000 shares were reserved for future issuance under the director plan .
rule 10b5-1 trading plans the following executive officers , timothy d .
cook , peter oppenheimer , philip w .
schiller , and bertrand serlet , have entered into trading plans pursuant to rule 10b5-1 ( c ) ( 1 ) of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) , as of november 1 , 2008 .
a trading plan is a written document that .

Table:
	2008	2007	2006
changes in fair value of derivatives	$ 7	$ -1 ( 1 )	$ 11
adjustment for net gains/ ( losses ) realized and included in net income	12	-2 ( 2 )	-12 ( 12 )
change in unrealized gains on derivative instruments	$ 19	$ -3 ( 3 )	$ -1 ( 1 )

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}

change in unrealized gains on derivative instruments


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the change in millions between 2012 and 2013 in currency hedges?

Pre-table text:
notes to consolidated financial statements net investment hedges the firm seeks to reduce the impact of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on its net investment in certain non- u.s .
operations through the use of foreign currency forward contracts and foreign currency-denominated debt .
for foreign currency forward contracts designated as hedges , the effectiveness of the hedge is assessed based on the overall changes in the fair value of the forward contracts ( i.e. , based on changes in forward rates ) .
for foreign currency-denominated debt designated as a hedge , the effectiveness of the hedge is assessed based on changes in spot rates .
for qualifying net investment hedges , the gains or losses on the hedging instruments , to the extent effective , are included in 201ccurrency translation 201d within the consolidated statements of comprehensive income .
the table below presents the gains/ ( losses ) from net investment hedging. .

Table:
in millions	year ended december 2013	year ended december 2012	year ended december 2011
currency hedges	$ 150	$ -233 ( 233 )	$ 160
foreign currency-denominated debt hedges	470	347	-147 ( 147 )

Post-table text:
the gain/ ( loss ) related to ineffectiveness was not material for 2013 , 2012 or 2011 .
the loss reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income was not material for 2013 or 2012 , and was $ 186 million for 2011 .
as of december 2013 and december 2012 , the firm had designated $ 1.97 billion and $ 2.77 billion , respectively , of foreign currency-denominated debt , included in 201cunsecured long-term borrowings 201d and 201cunsecured short- term borrowings , 201d as hedges of net investments in non- u.s .
subsidiaries .
cash flow hedges beginning in the third quarter of 2013 , the firm designated certain commodities-related swap and forward contracts as cash flow hedges .
these swap and forward contracts hedge the firm 2019s exposure to the variability in cash flows associated with the forecasted sales of certain energy commodities by one of the firm 2019s consolidated investments .
the firm applies a statistical method that utilizes regression analysis when assessing hedge effectiveness .
a cash flow hedge is considered highly effective in offsetting changes in forecasted cash flows attributable to the hedged risk when the regression analysis results in a coefficient of determination of 80% ( 80 % ) or greater and a slope between 80% ( 80 % ) and 125% ( 125 % ) .
for qualifying cash flow hedges , the gains or losses on derivatives , to the extent effective , are included in 201ccash flow hedges 201d within the consolidated statements of comprehensive income .
gains or losses resulting from hedge ineffectiveness are included in 201cother principal transactions 201d in the consolidated statements of earnings .
the effective portion of the gains , before taxes , recognized on these cash flow hedges was $ 14 million for 2013 .
the gain/ ( loss ) related to hedge ineffectiveness was not material for 2013 .
there were no gains/ ( losses ) excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness or reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income during 2013 .
the amounts recorded in 201ccash flow hedges 201d will be reclassified to 201cother principal transactions 201d in the same periods as the corresponding gain or loss on the sale of the hedged energy commodities , which is also recorded in 201cother principal transactions . 201d the firm expects to reclassify $ 5 million of gains , net of taxes , related to cash flow hedges from 201ccash flow hedges 201d to earnings within the next twelve months .
the length of time over which the firm is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions is approximately two years .
150 goldman sachs 2013 annual report .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what portion of total assets acquired is composed of goodwill?

Pre-table text:
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) in connection with these discover related purchases , we have sold the contractual rights to future commissions on discover transactions to certain of our isos .
contractual rights sold totaled $ 7.6 million during the year ended may 31 , 2008 and $ 1.0 million during fiscal 2009 .
such sale proceeds are generally collected in installments over periods ranging from three to nine months .
during fiscal 2009 , we collected $ 4.4 million of such proceeds , which are included in the proceeds from sale of investment and contractual rights in our consolidated statement of cash flows .
we do not recognize gains on these sales of contractual rights at the time of sale .
proceeds are deferred and recognized as a reduction of the related commission expense .
during fiscal 2009 , we recognized $ 1.2 million of such deferred sales proceeds as other long-term liabilities .
other 2008 acquisitions during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a majority of the assets of euroenvios money transfer , s.a .
and euroenvios conecta , s.l. , which we collectively refer to as lfs spain .
lfs spain consisted of two privately- held corporations engaged in money transmittal and ancillary services from spain to settlement locations primarily in latin america .
the purpose of the acquisition was to further our strategy of expanding our customer base and market share by opening additional branch locations .
during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a series of money transfer branch locations in the united states .
the purpose of these acquisitions was to increase the market presence of our dolex-branded money transfer offering .
the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocations of all these fiscal 2008 business acquisitions ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
	total
goodwill	$ 13536
customer-related intangible assets	4091
contract-based intangible assets	1031
property and equipment	267
other current assets	502
total assets acquired	19427
current liabilities	-2347 ( 2347 )
minority interest in equity of subsidiary ( at historical cost )	-486 ( 486 )
net assets acquired	$ 16594

Post-table text:
the customer-related intangible assets have amortization periods of up to 14 years .
the contract-based intangible assets have amortization periods of 3 to 10 years .
these business acquisitions were not significant to our consolidated financial statements and accordingly , we have not provided pro forma information relating to these acquisitions .
in addition , during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a customer list and long-term merchant referral agreement in our canadian merchant services channel for $ 1.7 million .
the value assigned to the customer list of $ 0.1 million was expensed immediately .
the remaining value was assigned to the merchant referral agreement and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over its useful life of 10 years .
fiscal 2007 on july 24 , 2006 , we completed the purchase of a fifty-six percent ownership interest in the asia-pacific merchant acquiring business of the hongkong and shanghai banking corporation limited , or hsbc asia pacific .
this business provides card payment processing services to merchants in the asia-pacific region .
the .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the change in billions in total capital ( tier 1 and tier 2 ) from 2007 to 2008?

Pre-table text:
mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts total mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts ( trust preferred securities ) , which qualify as tier 1 capital , were $ 23.899 billion at december 31 , 2008 , as compared to $ 23.594 billion at december 31 , 2007 .
in 2008 , citigroup did not issue any new enhanced trust preferred securities .
the frb issued a final rule , with an effective date of april 11 , 2005 , which retains trust preferred securities in tier 1 capital of bank holding companies , but with stricter quantitative limits and clearer qualitative standards .
under the rule , after a five-year transition period , the aggregate amount of trust preferred securities and certain other restricted core capital elements included in tier 1 capital of internationally active banking organizations , such as citigroup , would be limited to 15% ( 15 % ) of total core capital elements , net of goodwill , less any associated deferred tax liability .
the amount of trust preferred securities and certain other elements in excess of the limit could be included in tier 2 capital , subject to restrictions .
at december 31 , 2008 , citigroup had approximately 11.8% ( 11.8 % ) against the limit .
the company expects to be within restricted core capital limits prior to the implementation date of march 31 , 2009 .
the frb permits additional securities , such as the equity units sold to adia , to be included in tier 1 capital up to 25% ( 25 % ) ( including the restricted core capital elements in the 15% ( 15 % ) limit ) of total core capital elements , net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability .
at december 31 , 2008 , citigroup had approximately 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) against the limit .
the frb granted interim capital relief for the impact of adopting sfas 158 at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .
the frb and the ffiec may propose amendments to , and issue interpretations of , risk-based capital guidelines and reporting instructions .
these may affect reported capital ratios and net risk-weighted assets .
capital resources of citigroup 2019s depository institutions citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions in the united states are subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies , which are similar to the frb 2019s guidelines .
to be 201cwell capitalized 201d under federal bank regulatory agency definitions , citigroup 2019s depository institutions must have a tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6% ( 6 % ) , a total capital ( tier 1 + tier 2 capital ) ratio of at least 10% ( 10 % ) and a leverage ratio of at least 5% ( 5 % ) , and not be subject to a regulatory directive to meet and maintain higher capital levels .
at december 31 , 2008 , all of citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions were 201cwell capitalized 201d under the federal regulatory agencies 2019 definitions , including citigroup 2019s primary depository institution , citibank , n.a. , as noted in the following table : citibank , n.a .
components of capital and ratios under regulatory guidelines in billions of dollars at year end 2008 2007 .

Table:
in billions of dollars at year end	2008	2007
tier 1 capital	$ 71.0	$ 82.0
total capital ( tier 1 and tier 2 )	108.4	121.6
tier 1 capital ratio	9.94% ( 9.94 % )	8.98% ( 8.98 % )
total capital ratio ( tier 1 and tier 2 )	15.18	13.33
leverage ratio ( 1 )	5.82	6.65

Post-table text:
leverage ratio ( 1 ) 5.82 6.65 ( 1 ) tier 1 capital divided by adjusted average assets .
citibank , n.a .
had a net loss for 2008 amounting to $ 6.2 billion .
during 2008 , citibank , n.a .
received contributions from its parent company of $ 6.1 billion .
citibank , n.a .
did not issue any additional subordinated notes in 2008 .
total subordinated notes issued to citicorp holdings inc .
that were outstanding at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 and included in citibank , n.a . 2019s tier 2 capital , amounted to $ 28.2 billion .
citibank , n.a .
received an additional $ 14.3 billion in capital contribution from its parent company in january 2009 .
the impact of this contribution is not reflected in the table above .
the substantial events in 2008 impacting the capital of citigroup , and the potential future events discussed on page 94 under 201ccitigroup regulatory capital ratios , 201d also affected , or could affect , citibank , n.a. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
for the the quarter ended december 31 , 2006 what was the percent of the total number of shares purchased bought in october

Pre-table text:
issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about our repurchases of common stock during the three-month period ended december 31 , 2006 .
period total number of shares purchased average price paid per total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( 1 ) maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the program ( 2 ) .

Table:
period	total number ofshares purchased	average pricepaid pershare	total number of sharespurchased as part ofpublicly announcedprogram ( 1 )	maximum number ofshares that may yet bepurchased under theprogram ( 2 )
october	447700	$ 86.92	447700	36108688
november	849200	86.79	849200	35259488
december	929400	90.74	929400	34330088

Post-table text:
( 1 ) we repurchased a total of 2226300 shares of our common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2006 .
( 2 ) in october 2002 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program for the repurchase of up to 23 million shares of our common stock .
since the program 2019s inception , an additional 85 million shares have been authorized for repurchase under the program .
management has discretion to determine the number and price of the shares to be repurchased , and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation , under the program .
as of december 31 , 2006 , we had repurchased a total of 73669912 shares under the program .
in 2006 , we did not make any unregistered sales of equity securities. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage change in proportional free cash flow between 2014 and 2015?

Pre-table text:
proportional free cash flow ( a non-gaap measure ) we define proportional free cash flow as cash flows from operating activities less maintenance capital expenditures ( including non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ) , adjusted for the estimated impact of noncontrolling interests .
the proportionate share of cash flows and related adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests in our subsidiaries comprise the proportional adjustment factor presented in the reconciliation below .
upon the company's adoption of the accounting guidance for service concession arrangements effective january 1 , 2015 , capital expenditures related to service concession assets that would have been classified as investing activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows are now classified as operating activities .
see note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies of this form 10-k for further information on the adoption of this guidance .
beginning in the quarter ended march 31 , 2015 , the company changed the definition of proportional free cash flow to exclude the cash flows for capital expenditures related to service concession assets that are now classified within net cash provided by operating activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows .
the proportional adjustment factor for these capital expenditures is presented in the reconciliation below .
we also exclude environmental capital expenditures that are expected to be recovered through regulatory , contractual or other mechanisms .
an example of recoverable environmental capital expenditures is ipl's investment in mats-related environmental upgrades that are recovered through a tracker .
see item 1 . 2014us sbu 2014ipl 2014environmental matters for details of these investments .
the gaap measure most comparable to proportional free cash flow is cash flows from operating activities .
we believe that proportional free cash flow better reflects the underlying business performance of the company , as it measures the cash generated by the business , after the funding of maintenance capital expenditures , that may be available for investing or repaying debt or other purposes .
factors in this determination include the impact of noncontrolling interests , where aes consolidates the results of a subsidiary that is not wholly-owned by the company .
the presentation of free cash flow has material limitations .
proportional free cash flow should not be construed as an alternative to cash from operating activities , which is determined in accordance with gaap .
proportional free cash flow does not represent our cash flow available for discretionary payments because it excludes certain payments that are required or to which we have committed , such as debt service requirements and dividend payments .
our definition of proportional free cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies .
calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions ) 2015 2014 2013 2015/2014change 2014/2013 change .

Table:
calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions )	2015	2014	2013	2015/2014 change	2014/2013 change
net cash provided by operating activities	$ 2134	$ 1791	$ 2715	$ 343	$ -924 ( 924 )
add : capital expenditures related to service concession assets ( 1 )	165	2014	2014	165	2014
adjusted operating cash flow	2299	1791	2715	508	-924 ( 924 )
less : proportional adjustment factor on operating cash activities ( 2 ) ( 3 )	-558 ( 558 )	-359 ( 359 )	-834 ( 834 )	-199 ( 199 )	475
proportional adjusted operating cash flow	1741	1432	1881	309	-449 ( 449 )
less : proportional maintenance capital expenditures net of reinsurance proceeds ( 2 )	-449 ( 449 )	-485 ( 485 )	-535 ( 535 )	36	50
less : proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ( 2 ) ( 4 )	-51 ( 51 )	-56 ( 56 )	-75 ( 75 )	5	19
proportional free cash flow	$ 1241	$ 891	$ 1271	$ 350	$ -380 ( 380 )

Post-table text:
( 1 ) service concession asset expenditures excluded from proportional free cash flow non-gaap metric .
( 2 ) the proportional adjustment factor , proportional maintenance capital expenditures ( net of reinsurance proceeds ) and proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures are calculated by multiplying the percentage owned by noncontrolling interests for each entity by its corresponding consolidated cash flow metric and are totaled to the resulting figures .
for example , parent company a owns 20% ( 20 % ) of subsidiary company b , a consolidated subsidiary .
thus , subsidiary company b has an 80% ( 80 % ) noncontrolling interest .
assuming a consolidated net cash flow from operating activities of $ 100 from subsidiary b , the proportional adjustment factor for subsidiary b would equal $ 80 ( or $ 100 x 80% ( 80 % ) ) .
the company calculates the proportional adjustment factor for each consolidated business in this manner and then sums these amounts to determine the total proportional adjustment factor used in the reconciliation .
the proportional adjustment factor may differ from the proportion of income attributable to noncontrolling interests as a result of ( a ) non-cash items which impact income but not cash and ( b ) aes' ownership interest in the subsidiary where such items occur .
( 3 ) includes proportional adjustment amount for service concession asset expenditures of $ 84 million for the year ended december 31 , 2015 .
the company adopted service concession accounting effective january 1 , 2015 .
( 4 ) excludes ipl's proportional recoverable environmental capital expenditures of $ 205 million , $ 163 million and $ 110 million for the years december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the increase in long-term debt between 2004 and 2005 in thousands?

Pre-table text:
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the term of the economic rights agreement is seventy years ; however , tv azteca has the right to purchase , at fair market value , the economic rights from the company at any time during the last fifty years of the agreement .
should tv azteca elect to purchase the economic rights ( in whole or in part ) , it would also be obligated to repay a proportional amount of the loan discussed above at the time of such election .
the company 2019s obligation to pay tv azteca $ 1.5 million annually would also be reduced proportionally .
the company has accounted for the annual payment of $ 1.5 million as a capital lease ( initially recording an asset and a corresponding liability of approximately $ 18.6 million ) .
the capital lease asset and the discount on the note , which aggregate approximately $ 30.2 million , represent the cost to acquire the economic rights and are being amortized over the seventy-year life of the economic rights agreement .
on a quarterly basis , the company assesses the recoverability of its note receivable from tv azteca .
as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company has assessed the recoverability of the note receivable from tv azteca and concluded that no adjustment to its carrying value is required .
an executive officer and former director of the company served as a director of tv azteca from december 1999 to february 2006 .
as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company also had other long-term notes receivable outstanding of approximately $ 11.1 million and $ 11.2 million , respectively .
7 .
financing arrangements outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements consisted of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
	2005	2004
american tower credit facility	$ 793000	$ 698000
spectrasite credit facility	700000
senior subordinated notes	400000	400000
senior subordinated discount notes net of discount and warrant valuation	160252	303755
senior notes net of discount and premium	726754	1001817
convertible notes net of discount	773058	830056
notes payable and capital leases	60365	59986
total	3613429	3293614
less current portion of other long-term obligations	-162153 ( 162153 )	-138386 ( 138386 )
long-term debt	$ 3451276	$ 3155228

Post-table text:
new credit facilities 2014in october 2005 , the company refinanced the two existing credit facilities of its principal operating subsidiaries .
the company replaced the existing american tower $ 1.1 billion senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.3 billion senior secured credit facility and replaced the existing spectrasite $ 900.0 million senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.15 billion senior secured credit facility .
as a result of the repayment of the previous credit facilities , the company recorded a net loss on retirement of long-term obligations of $ 9.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2005. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what are the total contractual commitments , in millions?

Pre-table text:
purchases of short-term marketable securities , net of sales of short-term marketable securities during the quarter .
additionally , we incurred $ 3.8 million related to cash expenditures for property and equipment primarily on computer software projects and manufacturing equipment related to our expansion in ireland .
our financing activities during the year ended march 31 , 2009 provided cash of $ 46.2 million as compared to $ 2.1 million during the same period in the prior year .
cash provided by financing activities for the year ended march 31 , 2009 was primarily comprised of $ 42.0 million in net proceeds related to our august 2008 public offering and $ 5.0 million attributable to the exercise of stock options and proceeds from our employee stock purchase plan .
capital expenditures for fiscal 2010 are estimated to be $ 2.5 to $ 3.0 million , which relate primarily to our planned manufacturing capacity increases for impella in germany , our expansion in ireland , and software development projects .
our liquidity is influenced by our ability to sell our products in a competitive industry and our customers 2019 ability to pay for our products .
factors that may affect liquidity include our ability to penetrate the market for our products , maintain or reduce the length of the selling cycle , and collect cash from clients after our products are sold .
exclusive of activities involving any future acquisitions of products or companies that complement or augment our existing line of products , we believe that current available funds and cash generated from operations will provide sufficient liquidity to meet operating requirements for the foreseeable future .
we believe that our existing cash balances and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet our projected capital expenditures , working capital , and other cash requirements at least through the next 12 months .
we continue to review our long-term cash needs on a regular basis .
currently , we have no debt outstanding .
contractual obligations and commercial commitments the following table summarizes our contractual obligations at march 31 , 2009 and the effects such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods .
payments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) contractual obligations total than 1 than 5 .

Table:
contractual obligations	payments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) total	payments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) less than 1 year	payments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) 1-3 years	payments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) 3-5 years	payments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) more than 5 years
operating lease commitments	$ 10690	$ 2313	$ 4267	$ 2592	$ 1518
contractual obligations ( 1 )	9457	4619	4838	2014	2014
total obligations	$ 20147	$ 6932	$ 9105	$ 2592	$ 1518

Post-table text:
( 1 ) contractual obligations represent future cash commitments and expected liabilities under agreements with third parties for clinical trials .
we have no long-term debt , capital leases or other material commitments for open purchase orders and clinical trial agreements at march 31 , 2009 other than those shown in the table above .
in may 2005 , we acquired all the shares of outstanding capital stock of impella cardiosystems ag , a company headquartered in aachen , germany .
the aggregate purchase price excluding contingent payments , was approximately $ 45.1 million , which consisted of $ 42.2 million of our common stock , $ 1.6 million of cash paid to certain former shareholders of impella and $ 1.3 million of transaction costs , consisting primarily of fees paid for financial advisory and legal services .
at the time of the transaction , we agreed to make additional contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders based on additional milestone payments related to product sales and fda approvals in the amount of up to $ 16.8 million .
in january 2007 upon the sale of 1000 impella units , we paid $ 5.6 million in the form of common stock .
in june 2008 we received 510 ( k ) clearance of our impella 2.5 , and we paid $ 5.6 million in the form of common stock .
in april 2009 , we received 501 ( k ) clearance of our impella 5.0 , triggering an obligation to make the final$ 5.6 million milestone payment .
on may 15 , 2009 , we paid $ 1.75 million of this final milestone in cash and elected to pay the remaining amount through the issuance of approximately 664612 shares of our common stock .
this contingent payment will result in an increase to the carrying value of goodwill .
in june 2008 , we amended the lease for our facility in danvers , massachusetts .
the amendment extended the lease from february 28 , 2010 to february 28 , 2016 .
the lease continues to be accounted for as an operating lease .
the amendment changed the rent payments under the lease from $ 64350 per month to the following schedule : 2022 the base rent for july 2008 through october 2008 was $ 0 per month ; 2022 the base rent for november 2008 through june 2010 is $ 40000 per month ; 2022 the base rent for july 2010 through february 2014 will be $ 64350 per month ; and 2022 the base rent for march 2014 through february 2016 will be $ 66000 per month. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}