[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2011 to 2012 , in millions?

Pre-table text:
note 2 2013 restructuring charges 2013 actions during 2013 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 201 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 83 million , $ 37 million , and $ 81 million related to our information systems & global solutions ( is&gs ) , mission systems and training ( mst ) , and space systems business segments .
these charges reduced our net earnings by $ 130 million ( $ .40 per share ) and primarily related to a plan we committed to in november 2013 to close and consolidate certain facilities and reduce our total workforce by approximately 4000 positions within our is&gs , mst , and space systems business segments .
these charges also include $ 30 million related to certain severance actions at our is&gs business segment that occurred in the first quarter of 2013 , which were subsequently paid in 2013 .
the november 2013 plan resulted from a strategic review of these businesses 2019 facility capacity and future workload projections and is intended to better align our organization and cost structure and improve the affordability of our products and services given the continued decline in u.s .
government spending as well as the rapidly changing competitive and economic landscape .
upon separation , terminated employees will receive lump-sum severance payments primarily based on years of service .
during 2013 , we paid approximately $ 15 million in severance payments associated with these actions , with the remainder expected to be paid through the middle of 2015 .
in addition to the severance charges described above , we expect to incur accelerated and incremental costs ( e.g. , accelerated depreciation expense related to long-lived assets at the sites to be closed , relocation of equipment and other employee related costs ) of approximately $ 15 million , $ 50 million , and $ 135 million at our is&gs , mst , and space systems business segments related to the facility closures and consolidations .
the accelerated and incremental costs will be expensed as incurred in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations through their completion in 2015 .
we expect to recover a substantial amount of the restructuring charges through the pricing of our products and services to the u.s .
government and other customers in future periods , with the impact included in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations .
2012 and 2011 actions during 2012 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 48 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 25 million related to our aeronautics business segment and $ 23 million related to the reorganization of our former electronic systems business segment .
these charges reduced our net earnings by $ 31 million ( $ .09 per share ) and consisted of severance costs associated with the elimination of certain positions through either voluntary or involuntary actions .
these severance actions resulted from cost reduction initiatives to better align our organization with changing economic conditions .
upon separation , terminated employees received lump-sum severance payments primarily based on years of service , all of which were paid in 2013 .
during 2011 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 136 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 49 million , $ 48 million , and $ 39 million related to our aeronautics , space systems , and our is&gs business segments and corporate headquarters .
these charges reduced our net earnings by $ 88 million ( $ .26 per share ) and consisted of severance costs associated with the elimination of certain positions through either voluntary or involuntary actions .
these severance actions resulted from a strategic review of these businesses and our corporate headquarters and are intended to better align our organization and cost structure with changing economic conditions .
the workforce reductions at the business segments also reflected changes in program lifecycles , where several of our major programs were either transitioning out of development and into production or were ending .
upon separation , terminated employees received lump-sum severance payments based on years of service .
during 2011 , we made approximately half of the severance payments associated with these 2011 severance actions , and paid the remaining amounts in 2012 .
note 3 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2013	2012	2011
weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations	320.9	323.7	335.9
weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards	5.6	4.7	4.0
weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations	326.5	328.4	339.9

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage change in operating income from 2016 to 2017?

Pre-table text:
net revenues include $ 3.8 billion in 2017 and $ 739 million in 2016 related to the sale of rrps , mainly driven by japan .
these net revenue amounts include excise taxes billed to customers .
excluding excise taxes , net revenues for rrps were $ 3.6 billion in 2017 and $ 733 million in 2016 .
in some jurisdictions , including japan , we are not responsible for collecting excise taxes .
in 2017 , approximately $ 0.9 billion of our $ 3.6 billion in rrp net revenues , excluding excise taxes , were from iqos devices and accessories .
excise taxes on products increased by $ 1.1 billion , due to : 2022 higher excise taxes resulting from changes in retail prices and tax rates ( $ 4.6 billion ) , partially offset by 2022 favorable currency ( $ 1.9 billion ) and 2022 lower excise taxes resulting from volume/mix ( $ 1.6 billion ) .
our cost of sales ; marketing , administration and research costs ; and operating income were as follows : for the years ended december 31 , variance .

Table:
( in millions )	for the years ended december 31 , 2017	for the years ended december 31 , 2016	for the years ended december 31 , $	% (  % )
cost of sales	$ 10432	$ 9391	$ 1041	11.1% ( 11.1 % )
marketing administration and research costs	6725	6405	320	5.0% ( 5.0 % )
operating income	11503	10815	688	6.4% ( 6.4 % )

Post-table text:
cost of sales increased by $ 1.0 billion , due to : 2022 higher cost of sales resulting from volume/mix ( $ 1.1 billion ) , partly offset by 2022 lower manufacturing costs ( $ 36 million ) and 2022 favorable currency ( $ 30 million ) .
marketing , administration and research costs increased by $ 320 million , due to : 2022 higher expenses ( $ 570 million , largely reflecting increased investment behind reduced-risk products , predominately in the european union and asia ) , partly offset by 2022 favorable currency ( $ 250 million ) .
operating income increased by $ 688 million , due primarily to : 2022 price increases ( $ 1.4 billion ) , partly offset by 2022 higher marketing , administration and research costs ( $ 570 million ) and 2022 unfavorable currency ( $ 157 million ) .
interest expense , net , of $ 914 million increased by $ 23 million , due primarily to unfavorably currency and higher average debt levels , partly offset by higher interest income .
our effective tax rate increased by 12.8 percentage points to 40.7% ( 40.7 % ) .
the 2017 effective tax rate was unfavorably impacted by $ 1.6 billion due to the tax cuts and jobs act .
for further details , see item 8 , note 11 .
income taxes to our consolidated financial statements .
we are continuing to evaluate the impact that the tax cuts and jobs act will have on our tax liability .
based upon our current interpretation of the tax cuts and jobs act , we estimate that our 2018 effective tax rate will be approximately 28% ( 28 % ) , subject to future regulatory developments and earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction .
we are regularly examined by tax authorities around the world , and we are currently under examination in a number of jurisdictions .
it is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months certain tax examinations will close , which could result in a change in unrecognized tax benefits along with related interest and penalties .
an estimate of any possible change cannot be made at this time .
net earnings attributable to pmi of $ 6.0 billion decreased by $ 932 million ( 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) ) .
this decrease was due primarily to a higher effective tax rate as discussed above , partly offset by higher operating income .
diluted and basic eps of $ 3.88 decreased by 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) .
excluding .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the mathematical range for european cruise guests from 2010-2014?

Pre-table text:
16 royal caribbean cruises ltd .
the following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american and european cruise guests over the past five years : weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) royal caribbean cruises ltd .
total berths global cruise guests ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) .

Table:
year	weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )	royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths	globalcruiseguests ( 1 )	north americancruiseguests ( 2 )	europeancruiseguests ( 3 )
2010	391000	92300	18800000	10781000	5540000
2011	412000	92650	20227000	11625000	5894000
2012	425000	98650	20898000	11640000	6139000
2013	432000	98750	21300000	11816000	6399000
2014	448000	105750	22006063	12260238	6535365

Post-table text:
( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a combi- nation of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider , cruise industry news and clia .
in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base .
( 2 ) source : clia based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights ( see number 1 above ) .
includes the united states of america and canada .
( 3 ) source : clia europe , formerly european cruise council , ( see number 2 above ) .
north america the majority of cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 55.7% ( 55.7 % ) of global cruise guests in 2014 .
the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 3.3% ( 3.3 % ) from 2010 to 2014 .
europe cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 29.7% ( 29.7 % ) of global cruise guests in 2014 .
the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 4.2% ( 4.2 % ) from 2010 to 2014 .
asia/pacific in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe .
based on industry data , cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) of global cruise guests in 2014 .
the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 16.4% ( 16.4 % ) from 2010 to 2014 .
competition we compete with a number of cruise lines .
our princi- pal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise line , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line holdings ltd. , which owns norwegian cruise line , oceania cruises and regent seven seas cruises .
cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consumers 2019 leisure time .
demand for such activi- ties is influenced by political and general economic conditions .
companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending .
operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : 2022 protect the health , safety and security of our guests and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , 2022 strengthen and support our human capital in order to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , 2022 further strengthen our consumer engagement in order to enhance our revenues , 2022 increase the awareness and market penetration of our brands globally , 2022 focus on cost efficiency , manage our operating expenditures and ensure adequate cash and liquid- ity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , 2022 strategically invest in our fleet through the upgrade and maintenance of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while pru- dently expanding our fleet with new state-of-the- art cruise ships , 2022 capitalize on the portability and flexibility of our ships by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , 2022 further enhance our technological capabilities to service customer preferences and expectations in an innovative manner , while supporting our strategic focus on profitability , and part i .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
assuming 2010 accrued casualty costs were completely repaired in the following year , ,what would the repairs and maintenance expense increase to for 2011 in millions?

Pre-table text:
are allocated using appropriate statistical bases .
total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.2 billion for 2011 , $ 2.0 billion for 2010 , and $ 1.9 billion for 2009 .
assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .
amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .
12 .
accounts payable and other current liabilities dec .
31 , dec .
31 , millions 2011 2010 .

Table:
millions	dec . 31 2011	dec . 31 2010
accounts payable	$ 819	$ 677
income and other taxes	482	337
accrued wages and vacation	363	357
dividends payable	284	183
accrued casualty costs	249	325
interest payable	197	200
equipment rents payable	90	86
other	624	548
total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities	$ 3108	$ 2713

Post-table text:
13 .
financial instruments strategy and risk 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances for other than trading purposes to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices .
we are not a party to leveraged derivatives and , by policy , do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes .
derivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged , both at inception and throughout the hedged period .
we formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception , as well as our risk- management objectives , strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions , and method of assessing hedge effectiveness .
changes in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings .
we may use swaps , collars , futures , and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices ; however , the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable interest rate and fuel price movements .
market and credit risk 2013 we address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item .
we manage credit risk related to derivative financial instruments , which is minimal , by requiring high credit standards for counterparties and periodic settlements .
at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , we were not required to provide collateral , nor had we received collateral , relating to our hedging activities .
determination of fair value 2013 we determine the fair values of our derivative financial instrument positions based upon current fair values as quoted by recognized dealers or the present value of expected future cash flows .
interest rate fair value hedges 2013 we manage our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by adjusting the proportion of fixed and floating rate debt instruments within our debt portfolio over a given period .
we generally manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt through the issuance of targeted amounts of each as debt matures or as we require incremental borrowings .
we employ derivatives , primarily swaps , as one of the tools to obtain the targeted mix .
in addition , we also obtain flexibility in managing interest costs and the interest rate mix within our debt portfolio by evaluating the issuance of and managing outstanding callable fixed-rate debt securities .
swaps allow us to convert debt from fixed rates to variable rates and thereby hedge the risk of changes in the debt 2019s fair value attributable to the changes in interest rates .
we account for swaps as fair value .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage of future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year are due in 2008?

Pre-table text:
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 .
in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments .
the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits .

Table:
( in millions )	pensionbenefits	otherbenefits
2007	$ 1440	$ 260
2008	1490	260
2009	1540	270
2010	1600	270
2011	1660	270
years 2012 2013 2016	9530	1260

Post-table text:
as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits .
the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million .
the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 .
we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans .
the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .
note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .
future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) .
certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s .
government under short-term or cancelable arrangements .
note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment .
we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole .
we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty .
these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio .
the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology .
we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation .
on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california .
we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program .
the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s .
air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 .
on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim .
our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals .
on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel .
natural resources defense council , et al v .
lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel .
john d .
tillson v .
lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al .
the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the change in millions of ipalco common stock from 2015 to 2016?

Pre-table text:
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following table summarizes the company's redeemable stock of subsidiaries balances as of the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

Table:
december 31,	2016	2015
ipalco common stock	$ 618	$ 460
colon quotas ( 1 )	100	2014
ipl preferred stock	60	60
other common stock	4	2014
dpl preferred stock	2014	18
total redeemable stock of subsidiaries	$ 782	$ 538

Post-table text:
_____________________________ ( 1 ) characteristics of quotas are similar to common stock .
colon 2014 during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , our partner in colon increased their ownership from 25% ( 25 % ) to 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) and made capital contributions of $ 106 million .
any subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to our partner , or measure the investment at fair value , will be classified as temporary equity each reporting period as it is probable that the shares will become redeemable .
ipl 2014 ipl had $ 60 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , which represented five series of preferred stock .
the total annual dividend requirements were approximately $ 3 million at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 .
certain series of the preferred stock were redeemable solely at the option of the issuer at prices between $ 100 and $ 118 per share .
holders of the preferred stock are entitled to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors if ipl has not paid dividends to its preferred stockholders for four consecutive quarters .
based on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares is considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock is considered temporary equity .
dpl 2014 dpl had $ 18 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , which represented three series of preferred stock issued by dp&l , a wholly-owned subsidiary of dpl .
the dp&l preferred stock was redeemable at dp&l's option as determined by its board of directors at per-share redemption prices between $ 101 and $ 103 per share , plus cumulative preferred dividends .
in addition , dp&l's amended articles of incorporation contained provisions that permitted preferred stockholders to elect members of the dp&l board of directors in the event that cumulative dividends on the preferred stock are in arrears in an aggregate amount equivalent to at least four full quarterly dividends .
based on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect members of dp&l's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares was considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock was considered temporary equity .
in september 2016 , it became probable that the preferred shares would become redeemable .
as such , the company recorded an adjustment of $ 5 million to retained earnings to adjust the preferred shares to their redemption value of $ 23 million .
in october 2016 , dp&l redeemed all of its preferred shares .
upon redemption , the preferred shares were no longer outstanding and all rights of the holders thereof as shareholders of dp&l ceased to exist .
ipalco 2014 in february 2015 , cdpq purchased 15% ( 15 % ) of aes us investment , inc. , a wholly-owned subsidiary that owns 100% ( 100 % ) of ipalco , for $ 247 million , with an option to invest an additional $ 349 million in ipalco through 2016 in exchange for a 17.65% ( 17.65 % ) equity stake .
in april 2015 , cdpq invested an additional $ 214 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 24.90% ( 24.90 % ) .
as a result of these transactions , $ 84 million in taxes and transaction costs were recognized as a net decrease to equity .
the company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of 377 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .
no gain or loss was recognized in net income as the transaction was not considered to be a sale of in-substance real estate .
in march 2016 , cdpq exercised its remaining option by investing $ 134 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 30% ( 30 % ) .
the company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of $ 84 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .
in june 2016 , cdpq contributed an additional $ 24 million to ipalco , with no impact to the ownership structure of the investment .
any subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to cdpq will be classified as nci within permanent equity as it is not probable that the shares will become redeemable. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage growth of the stock price performance from 2013 to 2014 for the tractor supply company

Pre-table text:
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act .
the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 28 , 2013 to december 29 , 2018 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period .
the comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 28 , 2013 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends .
the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .

Table:
	12/28/2013	12/27/2014	12/26/2015	12/31/2016	12/30/2017	12/29/2018
tractor supply company	$ 100.00	$ 104.11	$ 115.45	$ 103.33	$ 103.67	$ 117.18
s&p 500	$ 100.00	$ 115.76	$ 116.64	$ 129.55	$ 157.84	$ 149.63
s&p retail index	$ 100.00	$ 111.18	$ 140.22	$ 148.53	$ 193.68	$ 217.01

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
for the facility leases that have remaining terms through fiscal 2010 , assuming the annual rent is approximately that of 2003 , what is the remaining total obligation?

Pre-table text:
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) march 31 , 2004 5 .
income taxes ( continued ) the effective tax rate of zero differs from the statutory rate of 34% ( 34 % ) primarily due to the inability of the company to recognize deferred tax assets for its operating losses and tax credits .
of the total valuation allowance , approximately $ 2400000 relates to stock option compensation deductions .
the tax benefit associated with the stock option compensation deductions will be credited to equity when realized .
6 .
commitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no .
45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no .
5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no .
34 ( fin no .
45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses .
these disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no .
5 , accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote .
the following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor .
product warranties 2013 the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale .
the ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards .
while the company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes , including monitoring and evaluating the quality of component suppliers , its warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates .
operating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision .
patent indemnifications 2013 in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products .
the indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims .
the company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions .
under the provisions of fin no .
45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only .
as of march 31 , 2004 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 .
the company has elected not to exercise a buyout option available under its primary lease that would have allowed for early termination in 2005 .
total rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations , was approximately $ 856000 , $ 823000 and $ 821000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2002 , 2003 and 2004 , respectively .
during the fiscal year ended march 31 , 2000 , the company entered into 36-month operating leases totaling approximately $ 644000 for the lease of office furniture .
these leases ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option the furniture was purchased .
rental expense recorded for these leases during the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2002 and 2003 was approximately $ 215000 and $ 127000 respectively .
during fiscal 2000 , the company entered into a 36-month capital lease for computer equipment and software for approximately $ 221000 .
this lease ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option these assets were purchased .
future minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2004 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
year ending march 31,	operating leases
2005	$ 781
2006	776
2007	769
2008	772
2009	772
thereafter	708
total future minimum lease payments	$ 4578

Post-table text:
from time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types .
while any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , will not have a material adverse effect on the company. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
for 2017 , what was net interest expense with related parties , in millions?

Pre-table text:
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 was dispatched starting in february 2018 .
aes puerto rico continues to be the lowest cost and epa compliant energy provider in puerto rico .
therefore , we expect aes puerto rico to continue to be a critical supplier to prepa .
starting prior to the hurricanes , prepa has been facing economic challenges that could impact the company , and on july 2 , 2017 , filed for bankruptcy under title iii .
as a result of the bankruptcy filing , aes puerto rico and aes ilumina 2019s non-recourse debt of $ 365 million and $ 36 million , respectively , is in default and has been classified as current as of december 31 , 2017 .
in november 2017 , aes puerto rico signed a forbearance and standstill agreement with its lenders to prevent the lenders from taking any action against the company due to the default events .
this agreement will expire on march 22 , 2018 .
the company's receivable balances in puerto rico as of december 31 , 2017 totaled $ 86 million , of which $ 53 million was overdue .
after the filing of title iii protection , and up until the disruption caused by the hurricanes , aes in puerto rico was collecting the overdue amounts from prepa in line with historic payment patterns .
considering the information available as of the filing date , management believes the carrying amount of our assets in puerto rico of $ 627 million is recoverable as of december 31 , 2017 and no reserve on the receivables is required .
foreign currency risks 2014 aes operates businesses in many foreign countries and such operations could be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates .
fluctuations in currency exchange rate between u.s .
dollar and the following currencies could create significant fluctuations in earnings and cash flows : the argentine peso , the brazilian real , the dominican republic peso , the euro , the chilean peso , the colombian peso , and the philippine peso .
concentrations 2014 due to the geographical diversity of its operations , the company does not have any significant concentration of customers or sources of fuel supply .
several of the company's generation businesses rely on ppas with one or a limited number of customers for the majority of , and in some cases all of , the relevant businesses' output over the term of the ppas .
however , no single customer accounted for 10% ( 10 % ) or more of total revenue in 2017 , 2016 or 2015 .
the cash flows and results of operations of our businesses depend on the credit quality of our customers and the continued ability of our customers and suppliers to meet their obligations under ppas and fuel supply agreements .
if a substantial portion of the company's long-term ppas and/or fuel supply were modified or terminated , the company would be adversely affected to the extent that it would be unable to replace such contracts at equally favorable terms .
26 .
related party transactions certain of our businesses in panama and the dominican republic are partially owned by governments either directly or through state-owned institutions .
in the ordinary course of business , these businesses enter into energy purchase and sale transactions , and transmission agreements with other state-owned institutions which are controlled by such governments .
at two of our generation businesses in mexico , the offtakers exercise significant influence , but not control , through representation on these businesses' boards of directors .
these offtakers are also required to hold a nominal ownership interest in such businesses .
in chile , we provide capacity and energy under contractual arrangements to our investment which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting .
additionally , the company provides certain support and management services to several of its affiliates under various agreements .
the company's consolidated statements of operations included the following transactions with related parties for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .

Table:
years ended december 31,	2017	2016	2015
revenue 2014non-regulated	$ 1297	$ 1100	$ 1099
cost of sales 2014non-regulated	220	210	330
interest income	8	4	25
interest expense	36	39	33

Post-table text:
.

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what were average operating profit for aeronautics in millions between 2014 and 2016?

Pre-table text:
$ 70 million .
since that time , we have continued to experience issues related to customer requirements and the implementation of this contract and have periodically accrued additional reserves .
consequently , we are continuing to monitor the scope , estimated costs , and viability of the program and the possibility of additional customer funding .
it is possible that we may have to record additional loss reserves in future periods , which could be material to our operating results .
however , we cannot make an estimate of the total expected costs at this time due to uncertainties inherent in the estimation process .
our consolidated net adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , net of state income taxes , increased segment operating profit by approximately $ 1.5 billion , $ 1.7 billion and $ 1.6 billion for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 .
the decrease in our consolidated net adjustments in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to a decrease in profit booking rate adjustments at our mfc and space systems business segments , partially offset by an increase at our rms business segment .
the increase in our consolidated net adjustments in 2015 compared to 2014 was primarily due to an increase in profit booking rate adjustments at our space systems and aeronautics business segments , offset by a decrease in profit booking rate adjustments at our rms and mfc business segments .
the consolidated net adjustments for 2016 are inclusive of approximately $ 530 million in unfavorable items , which include reserves for performance matters on an international program at rms .
the consolidated net adjustments for 2015 are inclusive of approximately $ 550 million in unfavorable items , which include reserves for performance matters on an international program at rms and on commercial satellite programs at space systems .
the consolidated net adjustments for 2014 are inclusive of approximately $ 535 million in unfavorable items , which include reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs at rms and net warranty reserve adjustments for various programs ( including jassm and gmlrs ) at mfc as described in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations below .
aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies .
aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , c-5m super galaxy and f-22 raptor .
aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2016	2015	2014
net sales	$ 17769	$ 15570	$ 14920
operating profit	1887	1681	1649
operating margin	10.6% ( 10.6 % )	10.8% ( 10.8 % )	11.1% ( 11.1 % )
backlog atyear-end	$ 34200	$ 31800	$ 27600

Post-table text:
2016 compared to 2015 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2016 increased $ 2.2 billion , or 14% ( 14 % ) , compared to 2015 .
the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.7 billion for the f-35 program due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities , partially offset by lower volume on development activities ; and approximately $ 290 million for the c-130 program due to increased deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2016 compared to 21 in 2015 ) and increased sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 250 million for the f-16 program primarily due to higher volume on aircraft modernization programs .
the increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the c-5 program due to decreased sustainment activities .
aeronautics 2019 operating profit in 2016 increased $ 206 million , or 12% ( 12 % ) , compared to 2015 .
operating profit increased approximately $ 195 million for the f-35 program due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities and higher risk retirements ; and by approximately $ 60 million for aircraft support and maintenance programs due to higher risk retirements and increased volume .
these increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 65 million for the c-130 program due to contract mix and lower risk retirements .
adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were approximately $ 20 million higher in 2016 compared to 2015 .
2015 compared to 2014 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2015 increased $ 650 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2014 .
the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.4 billion for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 150 million for the c-5 program due to increased deliveries ( nine aircraft .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the fair value of hologic common stock used for acquiring r2?

Pre-table text:
hologic , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) purchased products that the company continues to sell as well as utilize to enhance and incorporate into the company 2019s existing products .
the intangible assets are expected to be amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected useful lives as the anticipated undiscounted cash flows are relatively consistent over the expected useful lives of the intangible assets .
the estimated $ 600 of purchase price allocated to in-process research and development projects related to aeg 2019s organic photoconductor coating and selenium product lines .
the deferred income tax liability relates to the tax effect of acquired identifiable intangible assets , and fair value adjustments to acquired inventory , land , building and related improvements as such amounts are not deductible for tax purposes .
the company had an existing relationship with aeg as a supplier of inventory items .
the supply agreement was entered into in prior years at arm 2019s length terms and conditions .
no minimum purchase requirements existed and the pricing was consistent with other vendor agreements .
acquisition of r2 technology , inc .
on july 13 , 2006 , the company completed the acquisition of r2 technology , inc .
( r2 ) pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger dated april 24 , 2006 .
the results of operations for r2 have been included in the company 2019s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition as part of its mammography/breast care business segment .
r2 , previously located in santa clara , california , develops and sells computer-aided detection technology and products ( cad ) , an innovative technology that assists radiologists in the early detection of breast cancer .
the aggregate purchase price for r2 of approximately $ 220600 consisted of approximately 4400 shares of hologic common stock valued at $ 205500 , cash paid of $ 6900 , debt assumed of $ 5700 and approximately $ 2500 for acquisition related fees and expenses .
the company determined the fair value of the shares issued in connection with the acquisition in accordance with eitf issue no .
99-12 , determination of the measurement date for the market price of acquirer securities issued in a purchase business combination .
the components and allocation of the purchase price , consists of the following approximate amounts: .

Table:
net tangible assets acquired as of july 13 2006	$ 1200
in-process research and development	10200
developed technology and know how	39500
customer relationship	15700
trade name	3300
order backlog	800
deferred income taxes	4400
goodwill	145500
estimated purchase price	$ 220600

Post-table text:
the company finalized and completed a plan to restructure certain of r2 2019s historical activities .
as of the acquisition date the company recorded a liability of approximately $ 798 in accordance with eitf issue no .
95-3 , recognition of liabilities in connection with a purchase business combination , related to the termination of certain employees and loss related to the abandonment of certain lease space under this plan .
all amounts under this plan have been paid as of september 29 , 2007 .
the company reduced goodwill related to the r2 acquisition in the amount of approximately $ 400 during the year ended september 29 , 2007 .
the reduction was primarily related to a change in the preliminary valuation of certain assets and liabilities acquired based on information received during the year .
the final purchase price allocations were completed within one year of the .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
for december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , what was the average unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs , in billions?

Pre-table text:
the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2012 estimated expense as a baseline .
change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2012 pension expense ( in millions ) .

Table:
change in assumption ( a )	estimatedincrease to 2012pensionexpense ( in millions )
.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate	$ 23
.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets	$ 18
.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate	$ 2

Post-table text:
( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant .
our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions .
investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of permitted contributions in future years .
also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan .
we do not expect to be required by law to make any contributions to the plan during 2012 .
we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees .
recourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 3 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , pnc has sold commercial mortgage and residential mortgage loans directly or indirectly in securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions with continuing involvement .
one form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets in these transactions .
commercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate , close , and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s delegated underwriting and servicing ( dus ) program .
we participated in a similar program with the fhlmc .
under these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement .
at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 13.0 billion and $ 13.2 billion , respectively .
the potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 4.0 billion at both december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 .
we maintain a reserve for estimated losses based on our exposure .
the reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 47 million and $ 54 million as of december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .
if payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses .
our exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment .
residential mortgage loan and home equity repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors .
these loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements .
residential mortgage loans covered by these loan repurchase obligations include first and second-lien mortgage loans we have sold through agency securitizations , non-agency securitizations , and whole-loan sale transactions .
as discussed in note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , agency securitizations consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with fnma , fhlmc , and the government national mortgage association ( gnma ) program , while non-agency securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with private investors .
our historical exposure and activity associated with agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with fnma and fhlmc , as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with federal housing agency ( fha ) and department of veterans affairs ( va ) -insured and uninsured loans pooled in gnma securitizations historically have been minimal .
repurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment .
pnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition .
pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of the whole-loans sold in these transactions .
repurchase activity associated with brokered home equity lines/loans are reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment .
loan covenants and representations and warranties are established through loan sale agreements with various investors to provide assurance that pnc has sold loans to the pnc financial services group , inc .
2013 form 10-k 69 .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in millions in 2014 2013 and 2012 , what were the lowest amount of interest rate hedges?\\n\\n

Pre-table text:
notes to consolidated financial statements hedge accounting the firm applies hedge accounting for ( i ) certain interest rate swaps used to manage the interest rate exposure of certain fixed-rate unsecured long-term and short-term borrowings and certain fixed-rate certificates of deposit , ( ii ) certain foreign currency forward contracts and foreign currency-denominated debt used to manage foreign currency exposures on the firm 2019s net investment in certain non-u.s .
operations and ( iii ) certain commodities-related swap and forward contracts used to manage the exposure to the variability in cash flows associated with the forecasted sales of certain energy commodities by one of the firm 2019s consolidated investments .
to qualify for hedge accounting , the derivative hedge must be highly effective at reducing the risk from the exposure being hedged .
additionally , the firm must formally document the hedging relationship at inception and test the hedging relationship at least on a quarterly basis to ensure the derivative hedge continues to be highly effective over the life of the hedging relationship .
fair value hedges the firm designates certain interest rate swaps as fair value hedges .
these interest rate swaps hedge changes in fair value attributable to the designated benchmark interest rate ( e.g. , london interbank offered rate ( libor ) or ois ) , effectively converting a substantial portion of fixed-rate obligations into floating-rate obligations .
the firm applies a statistical method that utilizes regression analysis when assessing the effectiveness of its fair value hedging relationships in achieving offsetting changes in the fair values of the hedging instrument and the risk being hedged ( i.e. , interest rate risk ) .
an interest rate swap is considered highly effective in offsetting changes in fair value attributable to changes in the hedged risk when the regression analysis results in a coefficient of determination of 80% ( 80 % ) or greater and a slope between 80% ( 80 % ) and 125% ( 125 % ) .
for qualifying fair value hedges , gains or losses on derivatives are included in 201cinterest expense . 201d the change in fair value of the hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged is reported as an adjustment to its carrying value and is subsequently amortized into interest expense over its remaining life .
gains or losses resulting from hedge ineffectiveness are included in 201cinterest expense . 201d when a derivative is no longer designated as a hedge , any remaining difference between the carrying value and par value of the hedged item is amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the hedged item using the effective interest method .
see note 23 for further information about interest income and interest expense .
the table below presents the gains/ ( losses ) from interest rate derivatives accounted for as hedges , the related hedged borrowings and bank deposits , and the hedge ineffectiveness on these derivatives , which primarily consists of amortization of prepaid credit spreads resulting from the passage of time. .

Table:
$ in millions	year ended december 2014	year ended december 2013	year ended december 2012
interest rate hedges	$ 1936	$ -8683 ( 8683 )	$ -2383 ( 2383 )
hedged borrowings and bank deposits	-2451 ( 2451 )	6999	665
hedge ineffectiveness	$ -515 ( 515 )	$ -1684 ( 1684 )	$ -1718 ( 1718 )

Post-table text:
134 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what is the implied total value of the european sports satellite and cable network as of the transaction date?

Pre-table text:
international networks international networks generated revenues of $ 1637 million during 2012 , which represented 37% ( 37 % ) of our total consolidated revenues .
our international networks segment principally consists of national and pan-regional television networks .
this segment generates revenue from operations in virtually every pay-television market in the world through an infrastructure that includes operational centers in london , singapore and miami .
discovery channel , animal planet and tlc lead the international networks 2019 portfolio of television networks .
international networks has one of the largest international distribution platforms of networks with as many as fourteen networks in more than 200 countries and territories around the world .
at december 31 , 2012 , international networks operated over 180 unique distribution feeds in over 40 languages with channel feeds customized according to language needs and advertising sales opportunities .
international networks also has free-to-air networks in the u.k. , germany , italy and spain and continues to pursue international expansion .
our international networks segment owns and operates the following television networks which reached the following number of subscribers as of december 31 , 2012 : global networks international subscribers ( millions ) regional networks international subscribers ( millions ) .

Table:
global networks discovery channel	internationalsubscribers ( millions ) 246	regional networks dmax	internationalsubscribers ( millions ) 90
animal planet	183	discovery kids	61
tlc real time and travel & living	174	quest	26
discovery science	75	discovery history	13
investigation discovery	63	shed	12
discovery home & health	57	discovery en espanol ( u.s. )	5
turbo	42	discovery familia ( u.s )	4
discovery world	27

Post-table text:
on december 21 , 2012 , our international networks segment acquired 20% ( 20 % ) equity ownership interests in eurosport , a european sports satellite and cable network , and a portfolio of pay television networks from tf1 , a french media company , for $ 264 million , including transaction costs .
we have a call right that enables us to purchase a controlling interest in eurosport starting december 2014 and for one year thereafter .
if we exercise our call right , tf1 will have the right to put its remaining interest to us for one year thereafter .
the arrangement is intended to increase the growth of eurosport , which focuses on niche but regionally popular sports such as tennis , skiing , cycling and skating , and enhance our pay television offerings in france .
on december 28 , 2012 , we acquired switchover media , a group of five italian television channels with children's and entertainment programming .
( see note 3 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. ) education education generated revenues of $ 105 million during 2012 , which represented 2% ( 2 % ) of our total consolidated revenues .
education is comprised of curriculum-based product and service offerings .
this segment generates revenues primarily from subscriptions charged to k-12 schools for access to an online suite of curriculum-based vod tools , professional development services , digital textbooks and , to a lesser extent , student assessments and publication of hardcopy curriculum-based content .
our education business also participates in global brand and content licensing and engages in partnerships with leading non-profits , corporations , foundations and trade associations .
content development our content development strategy is designed to increase viewership , maintain innovation and quality leadership , and provide value for our network distributors and advertising customers .
our content is sourced from a wide range of third-party producers , which include some of the world 2019s leading nonfiction production companies as well as independent producers .
our production arrangements fall into three categories : produced , coproduced and licensed .
substantially all produced content includes content that we engage third parties to develop and produce , while we retain editorial control and own most or all of the rights , in exchange for paying all development and production costs .
coproduced content refers to program rights that we have collaborated with third parties to finance and develop because at times world-wide rights are not available for acquisition or we save costs by collaborating with third parties .
licensed content is comprised of films or series that have been previously produced by third parties. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
in 2015 what was the ratio of the net sales to the backlog

Pre-table text:
backlog backlog decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to sales being recognized on several multi-year programs ( such as hmsc , nisc iii , ciog and nsf asc ) related to prior year awards and a limited number of large new business awards .
backlog decreased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower customer funding levels and declining activities on direct warfighter support programs impacted by defense budget reductions .
trends we expect is&gs 2019 2016 net sales to decline in the high-single digit percentage range as compared to 2015 , primarily driven by key loss contracts in an increasingly competitive environment , along with volume contraction on the segment 2019s major contracts .
operating profit is expected to decline at a higher percentage range in 2016 , as compared to net sales percentage declines , driven by higher margin program losses and re-compete programs awarded at lower margins .
accordingly , 2016 margins are expected to be lower than 2015 results .
missiles and fire control our mfc business segment provides air and missile defense systems ; tactical missiles and air-to-ground precision strike weapon systems ; logistics ; fire control systems ; mission operations support , readiness , engineering support and integration services ; manned and unmanned ground vehicles ; and energy management solutions .
mfc 2019s major programs include pac-3 , thaad , multiple launch rocket system , hellfire , jassm , javelin , apache , sniper ae , low altitude navigation and targeting infrared for night ( lantirn ae ) and sof clss .
mfc 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2015	2014	2013
net sales	$ 6770	$ 7092	$ 6795
operating profit	1282	1344	1379
operating margins	18.9% ( 18.9 % )	19.0% ( 19.0 % )	20.3% ( 20.3 % )
backlog at year-end	$ 15500	$ 13300	$ 14300

Post-table text:
2015 compared to 2014 mfc 2019s net sales in 2015 decreased $ 322 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to the same period in 2014 .
the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 345 million for air and missile defense programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily pac-3 ) and lower volume ( primarily thaad ) ; and approximately $ 85 million for tactical missile programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily guided multiple launch rocket system ( gmlrs ) ) and joint air-to-surface standoff missile , partially offset by increased deliveries for hellfire .
these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 55 million for energy solutions programs due to increased volume .
mfc 2019s operating profit in 2015 decreased $ 62 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2014 .
the decrease was attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 100 million for fire control programs due primarily to lower risk retirements ( primarily lantirn and sniper ) ; and approximately $ 65 million for tactical missile programs due to lower risk retirements ( primarily hellfire and gmlrs ) and fewer deliveries .
these decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 75 million for air and missile defense programs due to increased risk retirements ( primarily thaad ) .
adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 60 million lower in 2015 compared to 2014 .
2014 compared to 2013 mfc 2019s net sales increased $ 297 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .
the increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 180 million for air and missile defense programs primarily due to increased volume for thaad ; about $ 115 million for fire control programs due to increased deliveries ( including apache ) ; and about $ 125 million for various other programs due to increased volume .
these increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 115 million for tactical missile programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily high mobility artillery rocket system and army tactical missile system ) .
mfc 2019s operating profit decreased $ 35 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .
the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 20 million for tactical missile programs due to net warranty reserve adjustments for various programs ( including jassm and gmlrs ) and fewer deliveries ; and approximately $ 45 million for various other programs due to lower risk retirements .
the decreases were offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 20 million for air and missile defense programs due to increased volume ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage change in total long-term debt net from 2014 to 2015?

Pre-table text:
note 10 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following ( in millions ) : .

Table:
	2015	2014
notes with rates from 1.85% ( 1.85 % ) to 3.80% ( 3.80 % ) due 2016 to 2045	$ 8150	$ 1400
notes with rates from 4.07% ( 4.07 % ) to 5.72% ( 5.72 % ) due 2019 to 2046	6089	3589
notes with rates from 6.15% ( 6.15 % ) to 9.13% ( 9.13 % ) due 2016 to 2036	1941	1941
other debt	116	111
total long-term debt	16296	7041
less : unamortized discounts and deferred financing costs	-1035 ( 1035 )	-899 ( 899 )
total long-term debt net	$ 15261	$ 6142

Post-table text:
revolving credit facilities on october 9 , 2015 , we entered into a new $ 2.5 billion revolving credit facility ( the 5-year facility ) with various banks and concurrently terminated our existing $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility , which was scheduled to expire in august 2019 .
the 5-year facility , which expires on october 9 , 2020 , is available for general corporate purposes .
the undrawn portion of the 5-year facility is also available to serve as a backup facility for the issuance of commercial paper .
we may request and the banks may grant , at their discretion , an increase in the borrowing capacity under the 5-year facility of up to an additional $ 500 million .
there were no borrowings outstanding under the 5-year facility as of and during the year ended december 31 , in contemplation of our acquisition of sikorsky , on october 9 , 2015 , we also entered into a 364-day revolving credit facility ( the 364-day facility , and together with the 5-year facility , the facilities ) with various banks that provided $ 7.0 billion of funding for general corporate purposes , including the acquisition of sikorsky .
concurrent with the consummation of the sikorsky acquisition , we borrowed $ 6.0 billion under the 364-day facility .
on november 23 , 2015 , we repaid all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility with proceeds received from an issuance of new debt ( see below ) and terminated any remaining commitments of the lenders under the 364-day facility .
borrowings under the facilities bear interest at rates based , at our option , on a eurodollar rate or a base rate , as defined in the facilities 2019 agreements .
each bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the 5-year facility is subject to , among other things , our compliance with various representations , warranties , and covenants , including covenants limiting our ability and certain of our subsidiaries 2019 ability to encumber assets and a covenant not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio , as defined in the five-year facility agreement .
as of december 31 , 2015 , we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the 5-year facility agreement , as well as in our debt agreements .
long-term debt on november 23 , 2015 , we issued $ 7.0 billion of notes ( the november 2015 notes ) in a registered public offering .
we received net proceeds of $ 6.9 billion from the offering , after deducting discounts and debt issuance costs , which are being amortized as interest expense over the life of the debt .
the november 2015 notes consist of : 2022 $ 750 million maturing in 2018 with a fixed interest rate of 1.85% ( 1.85 % ) ( the 2018 notes ) ; 2022 $ 1.25 billion maturing in 2020 with a fixed interest rate of 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) ( the 2020 notes ) ; 2022 $ 500 million maturing in 2023 with a fixed interest rate of 3.10% ( 3.10 % ) the 2023 notes ) ; 2022 $ 2.0 billion maturing in 2026 with a fixed interest rate of 3.55% ( 3.55 % ) ( the 2026 notes ) ; 2022 $ 500 million maturing in 2036 with a fixed interest rate of 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ( the 2036 notes ) ; and 2022 $ 2.0 billion maturing in 2046 with a fixed interest rate of 4.70% ( 4.70 % ) ( the 2046 notes ) .
we may , at our option , redeem some or all of the november 2015 notes and unpaid interest at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus any make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption .
interest is payable on the 2018 notes and the 2020 notes on may 23 and november 23 of each year , beginning on may 23 , 2016 ; on the 2023 notes and the 2026 notes on january 15 and july 15 of each year , beginning on july 15 , 2016 ; and on the 2036 notes and the 2046 notes on may 15 and november 15 of each year , beginning on may 15 , 2016 .
the november 2015 notes rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness .
the proceeds of the november 2015 notes were used to repay $ 6.0 billion of borrowings under our 364-day facility and for general corporate purposes. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the change in millions of carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet trading assets from 2007 to 2008?

Pre-table text:
the notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $ 1.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .
the amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .
these items have been classified appropriately in trading account assets or trading account liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet .
changes in fair value of these items are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
other items for which the fair-value option was selected in accordance with sfas 159 the company has elected the fair-value option for the following eligible items , which did not affect opening retained earnings : 2022 certain credit products ; 2022 certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity-method investments ; 2022 certain structured liabilities ; 2022 certain non-structured liabilities ; and 2022 certain mortgage loans certain credit products citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain originated and purchased loans , including certain unfunded loan products , such as guarantees and letters of credit , executed by citigroup 2019s trading businesses .
none of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment .
significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term , or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party .
citigroup has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications .
fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the company , including where those management objectives would not be met .
the following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value: .

Table:
in millions of dollars	2008 trading assets	2008 loans	2008 trading assets	loans
carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet	$ 16254	$ 2315	$ 26020	$ 3038
aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value	$ 6501	$ 3	$ 899	$ -5 ( 5 )
balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due	$ 77	$ 1113	$ 186	$ 1292
aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue	$ 190	$ -4 ( 4 )	$ 68	$ 2014

Post-table text:
in millions of dollars trading assets loans trading assets loans carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 16254 $ 2315 $ 26020 $ 3038 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value $ 6501 $ 3 $ 899 $ ( 5 ) balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 77 $ 1113 $ 186 $ 1292 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 190 $ ( 4 ) $ 68 $ 2014 in addition to the amounts reported above , $ 72 million and $ 141 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-value accounting were outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively .
changes in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loans depending on their balance sheet classifications .
the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 38 million and $ 188 million , respectively .
certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation .
the company has elected the fair-value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in our investment companies , which are reported at fair value .
the fair-value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments .
as required by sfas 159 , all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value .
these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .
citigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for under the equity method .
the company elected fair-value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity .
since the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value , the impact of applying the equity method to citigroup 2019s investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-value accounting .
thus , this fair-value election had no impact on opening retained earnings .
these investments are classified as other assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .
changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
certain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) .
the company elected the fair- value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis .
these positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form .
for those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 277 million as of december 31 , 2008 and $ 7 million as of december 31 , 2007 .
the change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .
related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement .
certain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what was the percentage change in capital expenditures for property , plant and equipment from 2008 to 2009?

Pre-table text:
( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 .

Table:
( in millions )	2010	2009	2008
net cash provided by operating activities	$ 3547	$ 3173	$ 4421
net cash used for investing activities	-319 ( 319 )	-1518 ( 1518 )	-907 ( 907 )
net cash used for financing activities	-3363 ( 3363 )	-1476 ( 1476 )	-3938 ( 3938 )

Post-table text:
operating activities net cash provided by operating activities increased by $ 374 million to $ 3547 million in 2010 as compared to 2009 .
the increase primarily was attributable to an improvement in our operating working capital balances of $ 570 million as discussed below , and $ 187 million related to lower net income tax payments , as compared to 2009 .
partially offsetting these improvements was a net reduction in cash from operations of $ 350 million related to our defined benefit pension plan .
this reduction was the result of increased contributions to the pension trust of $ 758 million as compared to 2009 , partially offset by an increase in the cas costs recovered on our contracts .
operating working capital accounts consists of receivables , inventories , accounts payable , and customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred .
the improvement in cash provided by operating working capital was due to a decline in 2010 accounts receivable balances compared to 2009 , and an increase in 2010 customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred balances compared to 2009 .
these improvements partially were offset by a decline in accounts payable balances in 2010 compared to 2009 .
the decline in accounts receivable primarily was due to higher collections on various programs at electronic systems , is&gs , and space systems business areas .
the increase in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred primarily was attributable to an increase on government and commercial satellite programs at space systems and air mobility programs at aeronautics , partially offset by a decrease on various programs at electronic systems .
the decrease in accounts payable was attributable to the timing of accounts payable activities across all segments .
net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $ 1248 million to $ 3173 million in 2009 as compared to 2008 .
the decline primarily was attributable to an increase in our contributions to the defined benefit pension plan of $ 1373 million as compared to 2008 and an increase in our operating working capital accounts of $ 147 million .
partially offsetting these items was the impact of lower net income tax payments in 2009 as compared to 2008 in the amount of $ 319 million .
the decline in cash provided by operating working capital primarily was due to growth of receivables on various programs in the ms2 and gt&l lines of business at electronic systems and an increase in inventories on combat aircraft programs at aeronautics , which partially were offset by increases in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred on government satellite programs at space systems and the timing of accounts payable activities .
investing activities capital expenditures 2013 the majority of our capital expenditures relate to facilities infrastructure and equipment that are incurred to support new and existing programs across all of our business segments .
we also incur capital expenditures for it to support programs and general enterprise it infrastructure .
capital expenditures for property , plant and equipment amounted to $ 820 million in 2010 , $ 852 million in 2009 , and $ 926 million in 2008 .
we expect that our operating cash flows will continue to be sufficient to fund our annual capital expenditures over the next few years .
acquisitions , divestitures and other activities 2013 acquisition activities include both the acquisition of businesses and investments in affiliates .
amounts paid in 2010 of $ 148 million primarily related to investments in affiliates .
we paid $ 435 million in 2009 for acquisition activities , compared with $ 233 million in 2008 .
in 2010 , we received proceeds of $ 798 million from the sale of eig , net of $ 17 million in transaction costs ( see note 2 ) .
there were no material divestiture activities in 2009 and 2008 .
during 2010 , we increased our short-term investments by $ 171 million compared to an increase of $ 279 million in 2009 .
financing activities share activity and dividends 2013 during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , we repurchased 33.0 million , 24.9 million , and 29.0 million shares of our common stock for $ 2483 million , $ 1851 million , and $ 2931 million .
of the shares we repurchased in 2010 , 0.9 million shares for $ 63 million were repurchased in december but settled and were paid for in january 2011 .
in october 2010 , our board of directors approved a new share repurchase program for the repurchase of our common stock from time-to-time , up to an authorized amount of $ 3.0 billion ( see note 12 ) .
under the program , we have discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation .
we repurchased a total of 11.2 million shares under the program for $ 776 million , and as of december 31 , 2010 , there remained $ 2224 million available for additional share repurchases .
in connection with their approval of the new share repurchase program , our board terminated our previous share repurchase program .
cash received from the issuance of our common stock in connection with stock option exercises during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 totaled $ 59 million , $ 40 million , and $ 250 million .
those activities resulted in the issuance of 1.4 million shares , 1.0 million shares , and 4.7 million shares during the respective periods. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}


[System] You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: "program_tokens". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with "EOF". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text.

[User]
Question:
what percentage of total goodwill is attributable to u.s . brokerage reporting unit as december 31 , 2011?

Pre-table text:
judgments the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets depends on a number of factors , including estimates of future market growth and trends , forecasted revenue and costs , expected useful lives of the assets , appropriate discount rates and other variables .
goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments .
each of these reporting units is tested for impairment individually during the annual evaluation .
there is no goodwill assigned to reporting units within the balance sheet management segment .
the following table shows the amount of goodwill allocated to each of the reporting units in the trading and investing segment ( dollars in millions ) : .

Table:
reporting unit	december 31 2011
u.s . brokerage	$ 1751.2
capital markets	142.4
retail bank	40.6
total goodwill	$ 1934.2

Post-table text:
in connection with our annual impairment test of goodwill , we concluded that the goodwill was not impaired as the fair value of the reporting units was in excess of the book value of those reporting units as of december 31 , 2011 .
the fair value of the reporting units exceeded the book value of those reporting units by substantial amounts ( fair value as a percent of book value ranged from approximately 150% ( 150 % ) to 700% ( 700 % ) ) and therefore did not indicate a significant risk of goodwill impairment based on current projections and valuations .
we also evaluate the remaining useful lives on intangible assets each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization .
effects if actual results differ if our estimates of fair value for the reporting units change due to changes in our business or other factors , we may determine that an impairment charge is necessary .
estimates of fair value are determined based on a complex model using cash flows and company comparisons .
if management 2019s estimates of future cash flows are inaccurate , the fair value determined could be inaccurate and impairment would not be recognized in a timely manner .
intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives .
if changes in the estimated underlying revenue occur , impairment or a change in the remaining life may need to be recognized. .

Allowed operations:
add, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average

Return JSON only in this form:
{"program_tokens": ["divide(", "9413", "20.01", ")", "EOF"]}