Datasets:
Tasks:
Image Classification
Formats:
json
Languages:
English
Size:
10K - 100K
ArXiv:
Tags:
privacy
License:
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -6,7 +6,192 @@ language:
|
|
| 6 |
- en
|
| 7 |
tags:
|
| 8 |
- privacy
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
pretty_name: CPRT Dataset
|
| 10 |
size_categories:
|
| 11 |
- 1K<n<10K
|
| 12 |
-
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
- en
|
| 7 |
tags:
|
| 8 |
- privacy
|
| 9 |
+
- cv
|
| 10 |
pretty_name: CPRT Dataset
|
| 11 |
size_categories:
|
| 12 |
- 1K<n<10K
|
| 13 |
+
---
|
| 14 |
+
# Dataset Card for CPRT-Bench
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
<!-- Provide a quick summary of the dataset. -->
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
CPRT-Bench is a benchmark dataset for assessing privacy risk in images, designed to model privacy as a graded and composition-dependent phenomenon.
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
## Dataset Details
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
### Dataset Description
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
<!-- Provide a longer summary of what this dataset is. -->
|
| 25 |
+
The dataset contains approximately 6.7K images annotated with:
|
| 26 |
+
- Ordinal severity levels (4 levels of privacy risk)
|
| 27 |
+
- Continuous risk scores (fine-grained privacy assessment)
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
All images are sourced from the VISPR (Visual Privacy Dataset). CPRT-Bench augments these images with structured annotations for privacy risk evaluation.
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
### Dataset Sources
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
<!-- Provide the basic links for the dataset. -->
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
- **Paper:** [https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.21573]
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
## Uses
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
<!-- Address questions around how the dataset is intended to be used. -->
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
### Direct Use
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
<!-- This section describes suitable use cases for the dataset. -->
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
CPRT-Bench is intended for:
|
| 47 |
+
- Evaluating privacy risk prediction in computer vision systems
|
| 48 |
+
- Benchmarking multimodal models on privacy perception tasks
|
| 49 |
+
- Studying calibration and ranking in risk prediction
|
| 50 |
+
- Research on context-aware and compositional reasoning in vision models
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
<!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the dataset will not work well for. -->
|
| 55 |
+
|
| 56 |
+
his dataset is not suitable for:
|
| 57 |
+
- Real-world privacy decision-making systems without additional safeguards
|
| 58 |
+
- Legal or regulatory enforcement
|
| 59 |
+
- Applications requiring culturally universal definitions of privacy
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
## Dataset Structure
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
<!-- This section provides a description of the dataset fields, and additional information about the dataset structure such as criteria used to create the splits, relationships between data points, etc. -->
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
Each example includes:
|
| 66 |
+
|
| 67 |
+
- **`id`**: Filename ID corresponding to a VISPR image
|
| 68 |
+
- **`binary_labels`**: A nested dictionary of binary attributes grouped by privacy level
|
| 69 |
+
- **`level`**: An integer severity label from 1 to 4
|
| 70 |
+
- **`score`**: A floating-point privacy-risk score
|
| 71 |
+
|
| 72 |
+
The `binary_labels` field is organized hierarchically:
|
| 73 |
+
|
| 74 |
+
- `level1`: attributes that uniquely and directly identify a specific individual on their own
|
| 75 |
+
- `level2`: attributes that can reference a person or reveal sensitive personal information
|
| 76 |
+
- `level3`: attributes that are non-sensitive and non-identifying in isolation, but can contribute to identity linkage or profiling when combined with other non-uniquely identifying information
|
| 77 |
+
- `level4`: attributes that are generally benign and non-identifying, but may be regarded as private information depending on the context
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
Example structure:
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
```json
|
| 82 |
+
{
|
| 83 |
+
"level1": {
|
| 84 |
+
"biometrics": 0/1,
|
| 85 |
+
"gov_ids": 0/1,
|
| 86 |
+
"unique_body_markings": 0/1
|
| 87 |
+
},
|
| 88 |
+
"level2": {
|
| 89 |
+
"contact_details": 0/1,
|
| 90 |
+
"full_legal_name": 0/1,
|
| 91 |
+
"non_unique_id": 0/1,
|
| 92 |
+
"medical_data": 0/1,
|
| 93 |
+
"financial_data": 0/1,
|
| 94 |
+
"beliefs": 0/1,
|
| 95 |
+
"nudity": 0/1,
|
| 96 |
+
"disability": 0/1,
|
| 97 |
+
"emotion_mental_health": 0/1,
|
| 98 |
+
"race_ethnicity": 0/1
|
| 99 |
+
},
|
| 100 |
+
"level3": {
|
| 101 |
+
"age": 0/1,
|
| 102 |
+
"gender": 0/1,
|
| 103 |
+
"location": 0/1,
|
| 104 |
+
"activities": 0/1,
|
| 105 |
+
"lifestyle": 0/1
|
| 106 |
+
},
|
| 107 |
+
"level4": {
|
| 108 |
+
"property_assets": 0/1,
|
| 109 |
+
"documents": 0/1,
|
| 110 |
+
"metadata": 0/1,
|
| 111 |
+
"background_people": 0/1
|
| 112 |
+
}
|
| 113 |
+
}
|
| 114 |
+
```
|
| 115 |
+
|
| 116 |
+
### Loading Instructions
|
| 117 |
+
|
| 118 |
+
CPRT-Bench contains annotation data only and does not distribute the underlying VISPR images. Users must download the VISPR dataset separately and resolve each id field to the corresponding image file.
|
| 119 |
+
The dataset adopts the VISPR split protocol:
|
| 120 |
+
- The training split is derived from the VISPR validation split
|
| 121 |
+
- The test split is derived from the VISPR test split
|
| 122 |
+
|
| 123 |
+
1. Download VISPR dataset:
|
| 124 |
+
- VISPR-test [link](https://datasets.d2.mpi-inf.mpg.de/orekondy17iccv/test2017.tar.gz)
|
| 125 |
+
- -VISPR-val [link](https://datasets.d2.mpi-inf.mpg.de/orekondy17iccv/val2017.tar.gz)
|
| 126 |
+
|
| 127 |
+
2. Load dataset:
|
| 128 |
+
|
| 129 |
+
```python
|
| 130 |
+
from datasets import load_dataset
|
| 131 |
+
|
| 132 |
+
dataset = load_dataset("timtsapras23/CPRT-Bench")
|
| 133 |
+
```
|
| 134 |
+
|
| 135 |
+
A simple way to load the image for each example is to search for the file that matches the VISPR `id`:
|
| 136 |
+
|
| 137 |
+
```python
|
| 138 |
+
import os
|
| 139 |
+
from glob import glob
|
| 140 |
+
from PIL import Image
|
| 141 |
+
|
| 142 |
+
|
| 143 |
+
VISPR_ROOT = "/path/to/vispr/images"
|
| 144 |
+
|
| 145 |
+
def load_vispr_image(example):
|
| 146 |
+
image_id = example["id"]
|
| 147 |
+
|
| 148 |
+
candidates = [
|
| 149 |
+
os.path.join(VISPR_ROOT, f"{image_id}.jpg"),
|
| 150 |
+
os.path.join(VISPR_ROOT, f"{image_id}.png"),
|
| 151 |
+
os.path.join(VISPR_ROOT, image_id),
|
| 152 |
+
]
|
| 153 |
+
|
| 154 |
+
image_path = next((p for p in candidates if os.path.exists(p)), None)
|
| 155 |
+
if image_path is None:
|
| 156 |
+
matches = glob(os.path.join(VISPR_ROOT, f"{image_id}.*"))
|
| 157 |
+
if matches:
|
| 158 |
+
image_path = matches[0]
|
| 159 |
+
else:
|
| 160 |
+
raise FileNotFoundError(f"Could not find an image for id={image_id}")
|
| 161 |
+
|
| 162 |
+
example["image"] = Image.open(image_path).convert("RGB")
|
| 163 |
+
return example
|
| 164 |
+
|
| 165 |
+
# Example: load the first split with images attached
|
| 166 |
+
# dataset["train"] = dataset["train"].map(load_vispr_image)
|
| 167 |
+
```
|
| 168 |
+
## Leaderboard
|
| 169 |
+
|
| 170 |
+
|
| 171 |
+
| Model | Spearman ρ ↑ | Pearson r ↑ | MAE ↓ |
|
| 172 |
+
|------|--------------|-------------|-------|
|
| 173 |
+
| **Gemini 3 Flash** | **0.872** | **0.884** | **0.140** |
|
| 174 |
+
| GPT-5.2 | 0.844 | 0.850 | 0.158 |
|
| 175 |
+
| Qwen3-VL (8B) + SFT (80 steps) | 0.762 | 0.799 | **0.140** |
|
| 176 |
+
| Qwen3-VL (4B) + SFT (80 steps) | 0.753 | 0.790 | 0.142 |
|
| 177 |
+
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0.763 | 0.728 | 0.233 |
|
| 178 |
+
| Qwen3-VL (32B) | 0.753 | 0.726 | 0.224 |
|
| 179 |
+
| Qwen3-VL (8B) | 0.751 | 0.636 | 0.291 |
|
| 180 |
+
| Pixtral (12B) | 0.720 | 0.616 | 0.311 |
|
| 181 |
+
| MiniCPM-V (8B) | 0.610 | 0.616 | 0.237 |
|
| 182 |
+
| Llama 3.2 VL (11B) | 0.571 | 0.460 | 0.344 |
|
| 183 |
+
|
| 184 |
+
## Citation
|
| 185 |
+
|
| 186 |
+
<!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the dataset, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
|
| 187 |
+
|
| 188 |
+
**BibTeX:**
|
| 189 |
+
|
| 190 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 191 |
+
@article{tsaprazlis2026cprt,
|
| 192 |
+
title={Rethinking Visual Privacy: A Compositional Privacy Risk Framework for Severity Assessment with VLMs},
|
| 193 |
+
author={Tsaprazlis, Efthymios and others},
|
| 194 |
+
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.21573},
|
| 195 |
+
year={2026}
|
| 196 |
+
}
|
| 197 |
+
```
|