messages
listlengths 3
3
|
|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nyou know what...\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/anime-gif-18519621\n<sep>\ni think we need to bring back plantations\n<sep>\nhush kitten, daddy is going to flash outside a public playground\n<sep>\nits time\n<sep>\nyes\n<sep>\nme kissing athena in my sleep\n<sep>\ny'all wish you were me\n<sep>\nthis one is peak tho\n<sep>\nhttps://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1257395745787744277/1299837594103709777/attachment.gif\n\nSet 2:\nHow was your Monday <uid>\n<sep>\n<:Bunny:1372525905372512266>\n<sep>\nMorning Jay. How’s you?\n<sep>\nWhat did I do? Lol\n<sep>\nSweet dreams Ita!\n<sep>\nI’m in the mood for butter chicken tonight\n<sep>\nIf anyone likes sour candies. These are not bad. That coating on them is beyond sour\n<sep>\nThe forgiveness or the teleportation?\n<sep>\nI’ve officially survived the union AGM\n<sep>\nHello again people"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution.\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- Very casual, often crude language\n- Uses lowercase throughout (\"you know what...\", \"i think we need to bring back plantations\", \"hush kitten, daddy is going to flash outside a public playground\", \"its time\", \"yes\", \"me kissing athena in my sleep\", \"y'all wish you were me\", \"this one is peak tho\")\n- Contains inappropriate/offensive content (plantation reference, inappropriate sexual references)\n- Uses slang like \"y'all\", \"tho\" \n- Shares GIFs/images frequently\n- Very fragmented, stream-of-consciousness style\n- No proper capitalization or punctuation\n- Seems to be making random, disconnected statements\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- Much more polite and conversational\n- Proper capitalization and punctuation (\"How was your Monday\", \"Morning Jay. How's you?\", \"Sweet dreams Ita!\")\n- Uses names/nicknames for people (Jay, Ita)\n- More coherent, contextual messages\n- Discusses normal daily activities (Monday, butter chicken, sour candies, union AGM)\n- Uses emojis in a normal way\n- Much more socially appropriate content\n- More complete sentences and thoughts\n- Greetings and farewells (\"Morning Jay\", \"Sweet dreams\", \"Hello again people\")\n\nThe writing styles are dramatically different:\n\n1. Tone: Set 1 is crude, inappropriate, and random vs Set 2 is polite, conversational, and appropriate\n2. Language: Set 1 uses no capitalization, poor grammar vs Set 2 uses proper capitalization and grammar\n3. Content: Set 1 contains offensive material vs Set 2 discusses normal daily life\n4. Structure: Set 1 is fragmented and random vs Set 2 is coherent and contextual\n5. Social awareness: Set 1 shows poor social boundaries vs Set 2 shows normal social interaction\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\n13 ppl since march\n<sep>\nPoppin\n<sep>\nhow come you didn't keep it\n<sep>\n<:oofsip:1220571476571324446>\n<sep>\nGenocide\n<sep>\n13 ppl since march\n<sep>\ni think its like dudes like a chick with small hands\n<sep>\nhttps://cdn.7tv.app/emote/01J8PTGRMR0006NP3M7JY4GZE8/4x.gif\n<sep>\n<uid> rizz wont believe me women goon to man hands\n<sep>\n<:Corgi_Wave:1191286298967810188>\n\nSet 2:\nPoppin\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/lock-in-locked-in-lock-tf-in-cat-cat-meme-gif-13335816645637017379\n<sep>\n<a:runfrompero:1280370359241281610>\n<sep>\nit says one of the bodies def wasn't a serieal killer\n<sep>\ngm nippi\n<sep>\nthey're idiots dont pay attention\n<sep>\nLesgo jack\n<sep>\nGenocide\n<sep>\nCmon ta wanna watch the show\n<sep>\nlmfao"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing style, tone, and patterns in both sets of messages:\n\nSet 1:\n- \"13 ppl since march\" (repeated twice)\n- \"Poppin\" \n- \"how come you didn't keep it\"\n- Uses Discord emotes like \"<:oofsip:1220571476571324446>\" and \"<:Corgi_Wave:1191286298967810188>\"\n- \"Genocide\"\n- \"i think its like dudes like a chick with small hands\"\n- Links to external content (7tv.app)\n- \"<uid> rizz wont believe me women goon to man hands\"\n\nSet 2:\n- \"Poppin\"\n- Links to external content (tenor.com)\n- Uses Discord emotes like \"<a:runfrompero:1280370359241281610>\"\n- \"it says one of the bodies def wasn't a serieal killer\" (typo: \"serieal\")\n- \"gm nippi\"\n- \"they're idiots dont pay attention\" (no apostrophe in \"dont\")\n- \"Lesgo jack\"\n- \"Genocide\"\n- \"Cmon ta wanna watch the show\"\n- \"lmfao\"\n\nSimilarities:\n1. Both use \"Poppin\" as what seems like a greeting or expression\n2. Both use \"Genocide\" as a single word message\n3. Both use Discord emotes extensively\n4. Both link to external content (gifs/images)\n5. Both have casual, informal writing style\n6. Both use lowercase writing predominantly\n\nDifferences in writing style:\n1. Set 1 has more complete sentences in some cases\n2. Set 2 has more abbreviations and contractions without apostrophes (\"dont\", \"Cmon\", \"gm\")\n3. Set 2 has a typo (\"serieal\" instead of \"serial\")\n4. The topics are different but that's not necessarily indicative\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\n13 ppl since march\n<sep>\nPoppin\n<sep>\nhow come you didn't keep it\n<sep>\n<:oofsip:1220571476571324446>\n<sep>\nGenocide\n<sep>\n13 ppl since march\n<sep>\ni think its like dudes like a chick with small hands\n<sep>\nhttps://cdn.7tv.app/emote/01J8PTGRMR0006NP3M7JY4GZE8/4x.gif\n<sep>\n<uid> rizz wont believe me women goon to man hands\n<sep>\n<:Corgi_Wave:1191286298967810188>\n\nSet 2:\nI have loraz ive only tried at that dose for anxiety as needed\n<sep>\nNice\n<sep>\nAh unfortunate\n<sep>\n<:snoopsmile:1161757306044813442>\n<sep>\nOk few\n<sep>\n<uid> your thoughts?\n<sep>\nAlso got some lavender\n<sep>\nThey combine dxm/bupropion for this reason as bupropion inhibits cyp2d6\n<sep>\nThey combine dxm/bupropion for this reason as bupropion inhibits cyp2d6\n<sep>\nLike improper fridge or freezer storage?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze both sets of messages for writing patterns, tone, style, and content.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"13 ppl since march\" (repeated twice)\n- \"Poppin\"\n- \"how come you didn't keep it\"\n- Uses Discord emotes: \"<:oofsip:1220571476571324446>\" and \"<:Corgi_Wave:1191286298967810188>\"\n- \"Genocide\" (single word message)\n- \"i think its like dudes like a chick with small hands\"\n- Uses GIF links from 7tv.app\n- \"<uid> rizz wont believe me women goon to man hands\"\n- Generally casual, informal tone\n- Uses lowercase mostly\n- Short, fragmented messages\n- Seems to be discussing relationships/attraction topics\n- Uses slang terms like \"rizz\", \"goon\"\n\nSet 2:\n- \"I have loraz ive only tried at that dose for anxiety as needed\"\n- \"Nice\"\n- \"Ah unfortunate\"\n- Uses Discord emote: \"<:snoopsmile:1161757306044813442>\"\n- \"Ok few\"\n- \"<uid> your thoughts?\"\n- \"Also got some lavender\"\n- \"They combine dxm/bupropion for this reason as bupropion inhibits cyp2d6\" (repeated twice)\n- \"Like improper fridge or freezer storage?\"\n- More technical/medical content (discussing medications, chemical compounds)\n- Mix of casual and more formal language\n- Better grammar and capitalization in some messages\n- Discusses pharmaceutical topics with some knowledge\n- Uses proper medical terminology\n\nComparing the two sets:\n\nSimilarities:\n- Both use Discord emotes\n- Both have casual conversational tone in places\n- Both use \"<uid>\" format when addressing someone\n- Both have short message format typical of chat\n\nDifferences:\n- Set 1 is much more casual, uses more slang, lowercase\n- Set 2 shows more technical knowledge, better grammar\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nI don't care about it if I don't have to go to a laundromat.\n<sep>\nWonderful world, indeed.\n<sep>\nlol\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/hey-girl-hey-gif-804438271306856987\n<sep>\nI'm not upset about it at all.\n<sep>\nThe drama is silly.\n<sep>\nWonderful world, indeed.\n<sep>\nI think I'd be a better person if I left sometimes.\n<sep>\nOk then stop talking to me about it.\n<sep>\nLast you recommended me was Ratatat and I've burned it up. lol\n\nSet 2:\nWonderful world, indeed.\n<sep>\nI think I'd be a better person if I left sometimes.\n<sep>\nGotta have an easy meal for after... everything that's gonna happen later.\n<sep>\nIt's storming here.\n<sep>\nPoor Widdy.\n<sep>\nGood times.\n<sep>\nI know the feeling.\n<sep>\nHold on.\n<sep>\nYeah, I've lost the heaviness for the most part but it still sneaks up on me sometimes.\n<sep>\nI don't care about it if I don't have to go to a laundromat."
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution.\n\nLooking at Set 1:\n- \"I don't care about it if I don't have to go to a laundromat.\"\n- \"Wonderful world, indeed.\"\n- \"lol\"\n- \"https://tenor.com/view/hey-girl-hey-gif-804438271306856987\"\n- \"I'm not upset about it at all.\"\n- \"The drama is silly.\"\n- \"Wonderful world, indeed.\"\n- \"I think I'd be a better person if I left sometimes.\"\n- \"Ok then stop talking to me about it.\"\n- \"Last you recommended me was Ratatat and I've burned it up. lol\"\n\nLooking at Set 2:\n- \"Wonderful world, indeed.\"\n- \"I think I'd be a better person if I left sometimes.\"\n- \"Gotta have an easy meal for after... everything that's gonna happen later.\"\n- \"It's storming here.\"\n- \"Poor Widdy.\"\n- \"Good times.\"\n- \"I know the feeling.\"\n- \"Hold on.\"\n- \"Yeah, I've lost the heaviness for the most part but it still sneaks up on me sometimes.\"\n- \"I don't care about it if I don't have to go to a laundromat.\"\n\nLet me look for commonalities and differences:\n\nIdentical phrases:\n- \"Wonderful world, indeed.\" appears in both sets\n- \"I think I'd be a better person if I left sometimes.\" appears in both sets (identical)\n- \"I don't care about it if I don't have to go to a laundromat.\" appears in both sets (identical)\n\nWriting style observations:\n- Both sets use casual, conversational tone\n- Both use \"lol\" (Set 1 has it twice, Set 2 doesn't have it)\n- Both have short, direct statements\n- Both use ellipses (...) in some messages\n- Both have informal grammar and sentence structure\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nI don't care about it if I don't have to go to a laundromat.\n<sep>\nWonderful world, indeed.\n<sep>\nlol\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/hey-girl-hey-gif-804438271306856987\n<sep>\nI'm not upset about it at all.\n<sep>\nThe drama is silly.\n<sep>\nWonderful world, indeed.\n<sep>\nI think I'd be a better person if I left sometimes.\n<sep>\nOk then stop talking to me about it.\n<sep>\nLast you recommended me was Ratatat and I've burned it up. lol\n\nSet 2:\nI’m sorry about your back is that where your spam was\n<sep>\nI took a thc gummy and a mushroom gummy but I didn’t get zooted like I thought I would\n<sep>\nHmm let me see\n<sep>\nTo know this 😂\n<sep>\nIdk\n<sep>\nI’m back in Alabama\n<sep>\nThat’s true\n<sep>\nI have yet to try that too exhausting\n<sep>\nHey it’s okay\n<sep>\nI’m pal-ing around in Florida"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing styles, tone, and characteristics of these two sets of messages.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"I don't care about it if I don't have to go to a laundromat.\" - Casual, direct\n- \"Wonderful world, indeed.\" - This phrase appears twice, suggesting it might be a catchphrase or repeated expression this person uses\n- \"lol\" - Common internet slang\n- GIF link sharing\n- \"I'm not upset about it at all.\" - Direct, somewhat defensive tone\n- \"The drama is silly.\" - Dismissive of drama\n- \"I think I'd be a better person if I left sometimes.\" - Somewhat introspective/self-reflective\n- \"Ok then stop talking to me about it.\" - Direct, possibly irritated\n- \"Last you recommended me was Ratatat and I've burned it up. lol\" - References music, casual tone, uses \"lol\" again\n\nSet 2:\n- \"I'm sorry about your back is that where your spam was\" - Seems like autocorrect error (\"spam\" instead of \"spasm\"?), shows concern for someone\n- \"I took a thc gummy and a mushroom gummy but I didn't get zooted like I thought I would\" - Very casual, talks about drug use openly\n- \"Hmm let me see\" - Contemplative\n- \"To know this 😂\" - Uses emoji, seems incomplete thought\n- \"Idk\" - Internet slang abbreviation\n- \"I'm back in Alabama\" - Geographic reference\n- \"That's true\" - Simple agreement\n- \"I have yet to try that too exhausting\" - Missing punctuation, stream of consciousness style\n- \"Hey it's okay\" - Comforting/reassuring\n- \"I'm pal-ing around in Florida\" - Casual, geographic reference\n\nComparing the two sets:\n\nSimilarities:\n- Both use casual, informal language\n- Both use internet slang (\"lol\", \"idk\")\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nWe got to the party at the same time and we are both car enthusiasts\n<sep>\nWhere can I post my go fund me?\n<sep>\nUnc in here fighting for her life\n<sep>\n~spouse <uid>\n<sep>\nBeen wanting to go to one\n<sep>\nHow you do the thing to see the pfp bigger?\n<sep>\nWho up Jorkin they Willy\n<sep>\nWhy you say that? 💀\n<sep>\nAll good, we’ll just pregame like crazy\n<sep>\nGotchu\n\nSet 2:\nWho up Jorkin they Willy\n<sep>\nShe the owner\n<sep>\nWho up Jorkin they Willy\n<sep>\nLet’s start that gofundme\n<sep>\n~spouse <uid>\n<sep>\nAh it works\n<sep>\nThat was an example\n<sep>\nI can literally fix an AC\n<sep>\nGet a temporary AC portable one\n<sep>\nWhy you say that? 💀"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"We got to the party at the same time and we are both car enthusiasts\"\n- \"Where can I post my go fund me?\"\n- \"Unc in here fighting for her life\"\n- \"~spouse <uid>\"\n- \"Been wanting to go to one\"\n- \"How you do the thing to see the pfp bigger?\"\n- \"Who up Jorkin they Willy\"\n- \"Why you say that? 💀\"\n- \"All good, we'll just pregame like crazy\"\n- \"Gotchu\"\n\nSet 2:\n- \"Who up Jorkin they Willy\"\n- \"She the owner\"\n- \"Who up Jorkin they Willy\"\n- \"Let's start that gofundme\"\n- \"~spouse <uid>\"\n- \"Ah it works\"\n- \"That was an example\"\n- \"I can literally fix an AC\"\n- \"Get a temporary AC portable one\"\n- \"Why you say that? 💀\"\n\nLet me look for similarities and differences:\n\nSimilarities:\n1. \"Who up Jorkin they Willy\" appears in both sets (exact match)\n2. \"~spouse <uid>\" appears in both sets (exact match)\n3. \"Why you say that? 💀\" appears in both sets (exact match)\n4. Both mention \"gofundme\" (though different phrasing - \"go fund me\" vs \"gofundme\")\n\nThe exact matches are quite striking - having three identical phrases across both sets is a strong indicator of same authorship.\n\nWriting style analysis:\n- Both use casual, informal language\n- Both use internet slang and abbreviations\n- Both use similar punctuation patterns\n- Both have a similar conversational tone\n- Both use lowercase for informal speech patterns\n\nThe \"Jorkin they Willy\" phrase is quite unique and appears twice in set 2 and once in set 1.\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nWe got to the party at the same time and we are both car enthusiasts\n<sep>\nWhere can I post my go fund me?\n<sep>\nUnc in here fighting for her life\n<sep>\n~spouse <uid>\n<sep>\nBeen wanting to go to one\n<sep>\nHow you do the thing to see the pfp bigger?\n<sep>\nWho up Jorkin they Willy\n<sep>\nWhy you say that? 💀\n<sep>\nAll good, we’ll just pregame like crazy\n<sep>\nGotchu\n\nSet 2:\ndo yall remember zcrump\n<sep>\nim happy ab thay\n<sep>\nbzz wrong\n<sep>\nCCOCA\n<sep>\ncasca\n<sep>\nbeo give me ur metabolisms\n<sep>\nwait let me screen recrod the whole shit\n<sep>\nAra\n<sep>\nhow much jgs is that\n<sep>\nexactly"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing style, tone, and patterns in both sets of messages.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"We got to the party at the same time and we are both car enthusiasts\" - Complete sentence, proper grammar\n- \"Where can I post my go fund me?\" - Proper question structure\n- \"Unc in here fighting for her life\" - Casual slang, AAVE-influenced\n- \"~spouse <uid>\" - Formal signature format\n- \"Been wanting to go to one\" - Casual, dropping subject \"I've\"\n- \"How you do the thing to see the pfp bigger?\" - Casual grammar, dropping \"do\"\n- \"Who up Jorkin they Willy\" - Internet slang/meme reference\n- \"Why you say that? 💀\" - Casual, emoji use\n- \"All good, we'll just pregame like crazy\" - Complete sentence, casual tone\n- \"Gotchu\" - Abbreviated slang\n\nSet 2:\n- \"do yall remember zcrump\" - All lowercase, casual\n- \"im happy ab thay\" - Multiple typos (ab = about, thay = that), no apostrophes\n- \"bzz wrong\" - Very casual, onomatopoeia\n- \"CCOCA\" - All caps, unclear meaning\n- \"casca\" - Single word, unclear\n- \"beo give me ur metabolisms\" - Typo (beo = bro), text speak (ur)\n- \"wait let me screen recrod the whole shit\" - Typo (recrod = record), profanity\n- \"Ara\" - Single word\n- \"how much jgs is that\" - Unclear abbreviation \"jgs\"\n- \"exactly\" - Simple response\n\nKey differences:\n\n1. Capitalization: Set 1 uses proper capitalization in most messages, while Set 2 is predominantly lowercase\n2. Grammar: Set 1 has better grammar overall, Set 2 has more errors and typos\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nit helps\n<sep>\ni just dont wanna run far af to find a single piece of cactus\n<sep>\nwym\n<sep>\nif they take care of themselves\n<sep>\nunfortunately think im boutta go nuts over this one piece of cactus tho\n<sep>\nthat was me last night\n<sep>\nyea nd a lot of other stuff\n<sep>\nwas hoping someone would have sum but\n<sep>\npm dm\n<sep>\nbut only reason i asked is because i need help with something nd idk whos all in the world frl\n\nSet 2:\nwym\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/rko-randy-orton-wwe-wrestling-slam-gif-5461459\n<sep>\nmaybe\n<sep>\ni think it would have to depend on the person for me\n<sep>\ncant remember exactly but could have sworn i explained my living situation\n<sep>\n<:Shrug:1305272360542142545>\n<sep>\nexactly my point\n<sep>\ndamn\n<sep>\nsigh\n<sep>\n<:boohoo:1305272272998633554>"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author.\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- Uses abbreviations: \"wym\" (what you mean), \"af\" (as f***), \"nd\" (and), \"sum\" (some), \"frl\" (for real)\n- Informal tone throughout\n- Lowercase letters predominantly \n- Uses \"tho\" instead of \"though\"\n- Uses \"boutta\" instead of \"about to\"\n- Short, fragmented sentences\n- Gaming/resource collection context (cactus collection)\n- Uses \"pm dm\" (private message/direct message)\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- Also uses \"wym\" - same abbreviation\n- Includes Discord emojis: <:Shrug:1305272360542142545> and <:boohoo:1305272272998633554>\n- Shares a GIF link\n- Still informal tone\n- Lowercase predominantly\n- Shorter, more fragmented responses\n- Uses \"damn\" and \"sigh\" as standalone responses\n- More conversational/chat-like responses\n\nSimilarities:\n1. Both use \"wym\" - this is a fairly specific abbreviation\n2. Both use predominantly lowercase\n3. Both have informal, casual tone\n4. Both use short, fragmented sentences\n5. Both seem to be in gaming/online chat contexts\n\nDifferences:\n1. Set 1 has more gaming-specific content (cactus collection)\n2. Set 2 has Discord emojis and GIF sharing\n3. Set 1 uses more text speak abbreviations (af, nd, sum, tho, boutta, frl)\n4. Set 2 has more minimal responses (damn, sigh, maybe)\n\nThe use of \"wym\" in both sets is notable - this is a fairly specific abbreviation that not everyone uses. The overall informal tone and lowercase style are consistent. However, Set 1 shows much more elaborate text speak usage while Set 2 is more minimal.\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nit helps\n<sep>\ni just dont wanna run far af to find a single piece of cactus\n<sep>\nwym\n<sep>\nif they take care of themselves\n<sep>\nunfortunately think im boutta go nuts over this one piece of cactus tho\n<sep>\nthat was me last night\n<sep>\nyea nd a lot of other stuff\n<sep>\nwas hoping someone would have sum but\n<sep>\npm dm\n<sep>\nbut only reason i asked is because i need help with something nd idk whos all in the world frl\n\nSet 2:\nYa it's pretty good\n<sep>\nInsufferable\n<sep>\nOral\n<sep>\nLol ok that's better\n<sep>\nOh it's just the same one. That's lame\n<sep>\n?daily\n<sep>\nLove the reference. Who's the rancor?\n<sep>\n365\n<sep>\nPulled pigtails and hurt feelings on the playground\n<sep>\nYa it's been a bit. But still a good one. Not the best thou obviously you are right"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing style, tone, and language patterns in these two sets of messages.\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- Uses informal language and text speak heavily (\"wym\", \"nd\", \"af\", \"frl\", \"sum\")\n- Uses lowercase almost exclusively\n- Shows casual, stream-of-consciousness style\n- Uses abbreviations like \"pm dm\"\n- Has run-on sentences and informal grammar\n- Tone is casual, conversational, somewhat rambling\n- Uses \"boutta\" instead of \"about to\"\n- Generally poor punctuation and capitalization\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- Uses more standard spelling and grammar\n- Proper capitalization at sentence beginnings\n- More complete sentences\n- Uses \"Ya\" instead of \"Yeah\" but otherwise more formal\n- Better punctuation\n- Tone is more structured and coherent\n- Uses complete words rather than heavy abbreviations\n- More organized thoughts\n\nThe writing styles are quite different:\n\nSet 1: Heavy text speak, all lowercase, very informal, stream-of-consciousness, lots of abbreviations\nSet 2: More standard English, proper capitalization, better structure, less abbreviated\n\nThe linguistic patterns are distinctly different. Set 1 shows someone who types very informally with heavy use of text speak and poor capitalization/punctuation. Set 2 shows someone who writes more formally with proper sentence structure and capitalization.\n\nThese appear to be from different authors based on the significant differences in writing style, formality level, and linguistic patterns.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nIts alriiight. I never gotten used to the taste of artificial sweeteners cause of it, they still taste like galvanic sewage to me:D\n<sep>\nThat is our reputation. But let me assure you, if I have to hear another I become a steak( false friend, sounds like bekommen, which means get), Im going to turn to dust\n<sep>\nI was actually called peng ting today:D\n<sep>\nI dont like this combination of words\n<sep>\nThanks, Im drooling now:D looks fire😍\n<sep>\nI was actually called peng ting today:D\n<sep>\nNoooooo:( not my joghurt\n<sep>\n<:Pepelipbite:1225047513438883913> <:Pepelipbite:1225047513438883913> <:Pepelipbite:1225047513438883913> I do believe, theres only one way to find out\n<sep>\nCan you play it?😍\n<sep>\nIts not such, thats from suchen(look for sth) its zieh:D\n\nSet 2:\nHope, you have a dope playlist to listen to🔥\n<sep>\nWhy do you always have the best gifs\n<sep>\nYou are so pretty and give off such dope vibes😍 aaaand I love the nails🔥\n<sep>\nI was indeed curious, thank you ever so much😍❤️ very understandable though:)\n<sep>\nHahaha sounds awesome, you take care of it now then, Im going to listen to my pillow now:) have a good one!:)\n<sep>\nRelatable:D\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/sal-lurking-sal-lurk-sal-vulcano-sal-lurk-gif-21668959\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/hug-me-im-sad-sad-girl-gif-2171129630658395796\n<sep>\nAt everyone in need of a good chewsday yes:)\n<sep>\nCan you play it?😍"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze both sets of messages for writing style, tone, punctuation, and other characteristics.\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- Uses \":D\" emoticon frequently\n- Uses \"Im\" instead of \"I'm\" (missing apostrophe)\n- Uses German references (\"bekommen\", \"joghurt\", \"suchen\", \"zieh\")\n- Informal spelling (\"alriiight\")\n- Uses unique expressions like \"galvanic sewage\"\n- Uses \"peng ting\" (British slang)\n- Has typos/informal writing\n- Uses Discord custom emojis format\n- Uses fire emoji 😍\n- Generally casual, playful tone\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- Uses \":)\" and \":D\" emoticons\n- Uses \"Im\" instead of \"I'm\" (missing apostrophe) - same pattern as Set 1\n- Uses fire emoji 🔥 and heart eyes 😍 - similar emoji usage\n- More conventional English, no German references\n- Uses \"dope\" repeatedly\n- Links to Tenor GIFs\n- Generally positive, complimentary tone\n- \"chewsday\" - informal/playful spelling similar to Set 1\n- Same question \"Can you play it?😍\" appears in both sets\n\nKey similarities:\n1. Both use \"Im\" without apostrophe consistently\n2. Both use \":D\" emoticon\n3. Both use 😍 emoji\n4. Both have informal, playful tone\n5. The exact same message \"Can you play it?😍\" appears in both sets\n6. Both use informal/creative spelling at times\n7. Both use casual, friendly language\n\nKey differences:\n1. Set 1 has German language references, Set 2 doesn't\n2. Set 1 uses Discord custom emojis, Set 2 uses Tenor GIFs\n3. Set 1 mentions specific cultural references (peng ting), Set 2 is more general\n4. Vocabulary differs somewhat (Set 2 uses \"dope\" repeatedly)\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nIts alriiight. I never gotten used to the taste of artificial sweeteners cause of it, they still taste like galvanic sewage to me:D\n<sep>\nThat is our reputation. But let me assure you, if I have to hear another I become a steak( false friend, sounds like bekommen, which means get), Im going to turn to dust\n<sep>\nI was actually called peng ting today:D\n<sep>\nI dont like this combination of words\n<sep>\nThanks, Im drooling now:D looks fire😍\n<sep>\nI was actually called peng ting today:D\n<sep>\nNoooooo:( not my joghurt\n<sep>\n<:Pepelipbite:1225047513438883913> <:Pepelipbite:1225047513438883913> <:Pepelipbite:1225047513438883913> I do believe, theres only one way to find out\n<sep>\nCan you play it?😍\n<sep>\nIts not such, thats from suchen(look for sth) its zieh:D\n\nSet 2:\nin ai studio...\n<sep>\nWHAT IS THAT INTERDFAC E\n<sep>\nwait\n<sep>\nwe reacghed it\n<sep>\nin AI STUDIOO\n<sep>\nHow... how can I now play text adventures...\n<sep>\n\n\nBuild apps with Gemini EXPERIMENTAL Builds apps using the SDK without a key , try arimayr ynerator that uses Imagen + Start from a template Dynamic text game using Gemir < > Gemini powered code review Imagen pixel art maker Showcase Your apps Recent apps FAQ Get API key Studio Dashboard Documentation ( + ) Build\n<sep>\nNOOOOOOOOOOOOO\n<sep>\nguys\n<sep>\nI just looked while my prompt was trying its work"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing styles in both sets.\n\nSet 1:\n- Uses emoticons frequently like :D, :( and 😍\n- Has some typos but they seem intentional/stylistic (\"alriiight\", \"Im\" without apostrophe)\n- Uses casual language and slang (\"peng ting\", \"looks fire\")\n- References German words/false friends (\"bekommen\", \"suchen\", \"zieh\")\n- Uses \"Im\" consistently without apostrophes\n- Has a playful, casual tone\n- Uses some Discord emotes like <:Pepelipbite:1225047513438883913>\n- Shows knowledge of German language\n\nSet 2:\n- Uses all caps for emphasis (\"WHAT IS THAT INTERDFAC E\", \"NOOOOOOOOOOOOO\", \"AI STUDIOO\")\n- Has obvious typos that seem unintentional (\"interdfac e\", \"reacghed\", \"arimayr ynerator\") \n- Much shorter, more fragmented messages\n- Tone seems more excited/frantic\n- No emoticons like :D or :(\n- No German language references\n- Different punctuation style\n- Messages seem to be about AI Studio interface/technical stuff\n- Uses \"...\" punctuation\n\nThe writing styles seem quite different:\n- Set 1 uses emoticons consistently, Set 2 uses caps for emphasis\n- Set 1 has German language knowledge, Set 2 doesn't show this\n- Set 1 has more coherent longer messages, Set 2 has fragmented shorter ones\n- Typo patterns are different - Set 1 seems more intentional, Set 2 seems more rushed\n- Punctuation styles differ significantly\n- Overall tone and subject matter are quite different\n\nThese appear to be different authors.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nBBQ CHIP\n<sep>\nNothing I dont think\n<sep>\nSorry you carry a bear around and named it Paddington after the rapist thay fingered your nono square\n<sep>\nYou been hearing those tunes from the outside of the house of my buddy corey\n<sep>\nI know his brother Bravo.\n<sep>\nSo?\n<sep>\nWhatever youre mad I seen barney at recess in 6th grade\n<sep>\nSorry you carry a bear around and named it Paddington after the rapist thay fingered your nono square\n<sep>\nShit all over your siding\n<sep>\nINCEST BITCH\n\nSet 2:\n💺 🪑\n<sep>\nWere they fairies or fairly?\n<sep>\nWow. Whore mother\n<sep>\nDo you have it\n<sep>\nIm calling CPS again\n<sep>\nI hates that bitch too, she fucked my mans.\n<sep>\nBBQ CHIP\n<sep>\nBBQ CHIP\n<sep>\nKids in my back yard or something\n<sep>\n💺 🪑"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author.\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- \"BBQ CHIP\" - short, all caps phrase\n- \"Nothing I dont think\" - casual, missing apostrophe in \"don't\"\n- Several very crude and inappropriate messages about bears, Paddington, sexual content\n- \"You been hearing those tunes from the outside of the house of my buddy corey\" - grammatically incorrect (\"You been\" instead of \"You've been\"), casual tone\n- \"I know his brother Bravo.\" - simple statement\n- \"So?\" - very short response\n- \"Whatever youre mad I seen barney at recess in 6th grade\" - missing apostrophe in \"you're\", grammatically incorrect (\"I seen\" instead of \"I saw\")\n- Repetition of the crude Paddington message\n- \"Shit all over your siding\" - crude, short\n- \"INCEST BITCH\" - all caps, crude\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- \"💺 🪑\" - just chair emojis\n- \"Were they fairies or fairly?\" - question about word choice\n- \"Wow. Whore mother\" - crude, short\n- \"Do you have it\" - simple question\n- \"Im calling CPS again\" - missing apostrophe in \"I'm\", suggests ongoing conflict\n- \"I hates that bitch too, she fucked my mans.\" - grammatically incorrect (\"I hates\" instead of \"I hate\", \"my mans\" instead of \"my man\"), crude language\n- \"BBQ CHIP\" - exact same phrase as in Set 1, all caps\n- \"BBQ CHIP\" - repeated again\n- \"Kids in my back yard or something\" - casual, uncertain tone\n- \"💺 🪑\" - repeated chair emojis\n\nSimilarities:\n1. Both sets contain \"BBQ CHIP\" in all caps - this is quite distinctive\n2. Both show consistent grammatical errors and missing apostrophes\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nBBQ CHIP\n<sep>\nNothing I dont think\n<sep>\nSorry you carry a bear around and named it Paddington after the rapist thay fingered your nono square\n<sep>\nYou been hearing those tunes from the outside of the house of my buddy corey\n<sep>\nI know his brother Bravo.\n<sep>\nSo?\n<sep>\nWhatever youre mad I seen barney at recess in 6th grade\n<sep>\nSorry you carry a bear around and named it Paddington after the rapist thay fingered your nono square\n<sep>\nShit all over your siding\n<sep>\nINCEST BITCH\n\nSet 2:\n🖕\n<sep>\nGood\n<sep>\nYay!\n<sep>\nI wanted to make friends\n<sep>\nWHY DOES EVERYONE THINK IM ASIAN\n<sep>\nSup\n<sep>\nAwww man\n<sep>\nWhat\n<sep>\nChat is this rizz?\n<sep>\nUgh im so bored!"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution by looking at various characteristics:\n\nSet 1:\n- Much more aggressive and hostile tone\n- Contains offensive and inappropriate language \n- Uses crude references (\"rapist\", \"fingered your nono square\", \"INCEST BITCH\")\n- More complex sentence structures \n- References specific people/places (\"Corey\", \"Bravo\", \"Barney\")\n- Repetition of the same offensive message twice\n- Generally more elaborate and detailed messages\n- Spelling/grammar: \"thay\" instead of \"they\"\n- All caps for emphasis (\"BBQ CHIP\", \"INCEST BITCH\")\n- More mature/adult themes (though expressed inappropriately)\n\nSet 2:\n- Much more casual, friendly tone\n- Uses emoji (🖕 - though this is hostile, it stands alone)\n- Shorter, simpler messages\n- More typical casual internet slang (\"Sup\", \"Chat is this rizz?\")\n- Expresses typical social concerns (\"I wanted to make friends\", \"WHY DOES EVERYONE THINK IM ASIAN\")\n- Uses internet/gaming terminology (\"rizz\", \"Chat\")\n- Exclamation points for emphasis\n- Generally sounds younger/more typical of social media\n- \"Awww man\" - more casual expression\n- \"Ugh im so bored!\" - typical casual complaint\n\nThe tone, content, complexity, and style are dramatically different between these sets:\n\nSet 1: Hostile, offensive, more complex language, specific references, crude content\nSet 2: Casual, social, simpler language, typical internet slang, more innocent concerns\n\nThe writing styles are so different - one is aggressively inappropriate while the other is casually social. The vocabulary, sentence structure, topics of conversation, and overall tone suggest these are from different authors.\n\nThe only similarity might be the age demographic could potentially overlap (both seem potentially young), but the personality, communication style, and content approach are vastly different.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\njust like when they removed it from api\n<sep>\nthey're wary of distillation\n<sep>\nlike count\n<sep>\nworld sim\n<sep>\npeople\n<sep>\nthe workaround is prompting the summary model to think lol\n<sep>\nI agree\n<sep>\ndude they're packing so much into ai mode it's insane\n<sep>\nhaven't tried those\n<sep>\njust like when they removed it from api\n\nSet 2:\ni got Gemini diffusion\n<sep>\nbruh i'm visibly watching the like count drop from 21k to 17k while talking about search\n<sep>\ntel me what you filled in\n<sep>\nawesome demo\n<sep>\nthe workaround is prompting the summary model to think lol\n<sep>\nJesus you're a hater\n<sep>\nthe workaround is prompting the summary model to think lol\n<sep>\nagentic search is cool\n<sep>\ndamn\n<sep>\nbecause it does"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze both sets of messages for writing style, tone, and content patterns.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"just like when they removed it from api\" (appears twice)\n- \"they're wary of distillation\"\n- \"like count\"\n- \"world sim\"\n- \"people\"\n- \"the workaround is prompting the summary model to think lol\"\n- \"I agree\"\n- \"dude they're packing so much into ai mode it's insane\"\n- \"haven't tried those\"\n\nSet 2:\n- \"i got Gemini diffusion\"\n- \"bruh i'm visibly watching the like count drop from 21k to 17k while talking about search\"\n- \"tel me what you filled in\"\n- \"awesome demo\"\n- \"the workaround is prompting the summary model to think lol\" (appears twice)\n- \"Jesus you're a hater\"\n- \"agentic search is cool\"\n- \"damn\"\n- \"because it does\"\n\nKey observations:\n\n1. Both sets contain the exact phrase \"the workaround is prompting the summary model to think lol\" - this is a very specific phrase that appears in both sets.\n\n2. Both mention \"like count\" - Set 1 has just \"like count\" while Set 2 has \"bruh i'm visibly watching the like count drop from 21k to 17k while talking about search\"\n\n3. Writing style similarities:\n- Both use casual, informal language\n- Both use internet slang (\"dude\", \"bruh\", \"lol\")\n- Both discuss technical topics (AI, APIs, search, etc.)\n- Short, fragmented messages\n\n4. Capitalization patterns:\n- Set 1: Mix of lowercase and proper capitalization (\"I agree\")\n- Set 2: Mostly lowercase (\"i got\", \"tel me\") with some proper nouns capitalized\n\n5. Tone:\n- Both sets have a casual, conversational tone\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\njust like when they removed it from api\n<sep>\nthey're wary of distillation\n<sep>\nlike count\n<sep>\nworld sim\n<sep>\npeople\n<sep>\nthe workaround is prompting the summary model to think lol\n<sep>\nI agree\n<sep>\ndude they're packing so much into ai mode it's insane\n<sep>\nhaven't tried those\n<sep>\njust like when they removed it from api\n\nSet 2:\nWhy so?\n<sep>\nLooks nice\n<sep>\nHow was it stored\n<sep>\nThat pfp\n<sep>\nIs it still good?\n<sep>\nGood to know though\n<sep>\nHau hhc from gilded\n<sep>\nNice\n<sep>\nAlso got some lavender\n<sep>\nThat's fucked"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"just like when they removed it from api\"\n- \"they're wary of distillation\"\n- \"like count\"\n- \"world sim\"\n- \"people\"\n- \"the workaround is prompting the summary model to think lol\"\n- \"I agree\"\n- \"dude they're packing so much into ai mode it's insane\"\n- \"haven't tried those\"\n- \"just like when they removed it from api\"\n\nSet 2:\n- \"Why so?\"\n- \"Looks nice\"\n- \"How was it stored\"\n- \"That pfp\"\n- \"Is it still good?\"\n- \"Good to know though\"\n- \"Hau hhc from gilded\"\n- \"Nice\"\n- \"Also got some lavender\"\n- \"That's fucked\"\n\nLet me analyze the writing style and characteristics:\n\nSet 1:\n- Tech-focused language (\"api\", \"distillation\", \"world sim\", \"summary model\", \"ai mode\")\n- Casual tone with tech jargon\n- Uses \"lol\" once\n- Uses \"dude\" \n- Lowercase style mostly\n- Seems to be discussing AI/ML topics\n- One repeated message exactly\n- Longer, more complex sentences in some cases\n- Uses contractions (\"they're\", \"haven't\")\n\nSet 2:\n- Much shorter messages overall\n- More conversational/casual\n- Asks questions (\"Why so?\", \"How was it stored\", \"Is it still good?\")\n- Uses \"pfp\" (profile picture abbreviation)\n- Mentions physical items (\"lavender\")\n- Uses \"That's fucked\" - more crude language\n- \"Nice\" appears twice\n- Generally shorter, simpler responses\n- Also uses contractions (\"That's\")\n\nThe content is very different - Set 1 is clearly about AI/tech topics while Set 2 seems to be about physical items, storage, and more general conversation.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nLove the reference. Who's the rancor?\n<sep>\nYarrow\n<sep>\nInsufferable\n<sep>\nHaha I meant who in here is he referencing as the rancor. I know what the rancor is.\n<sep>\nAll snap chat is lol\n<sep>\nSo wholesome stich!\n<sep>\nWell not for me!\n<sep>\nAlso I'm glad you say you seem to have found some of that with this group. I don't share that particular experience but that's ok. I am always willing to chat more though if you'd like.\n<sep>\nBuhahaha!\n<sep>\nHaha I meant who in here is he referencing as the rancor. I know what the rancor is.\n\nSet 2:\nAlso I know it's very hard to find a group you relate to and feel you fit in. I struggle for that too and sometimes you think you find it and it turns out it's not. But all you can do is keep putting yourself out there and hope that you find your people. Don't close up. Stay open. Keep trying. And they're out there buddy.\n<sep>\n?use calculator\n<sep>\n365\n<sep>\n363\n<sep>\nSo wholesome stich!\n<sep>\nDamn it James!n\n<sep>\nOral\n<sep>\nHey I know this is an older post but I'm just catching up. I've been busy. \n\nBut I completely relate to what you're saying here. I have a similar situation where I constantly struggle to find a way to engage with my partner in my interests. And although I do things that they enjoy and always am there for when they want to do something. \n\nI must admit I can't say I have a solution as this is still something I am working through. I found what helped me thou was more finding other people who relate to my interests. And it's not to replace her because it's not those kind of relationships that I'm creating elsewhere. But it's more of a redirect of my interests to other people so my partner doesn't have to.\n<sep>\nAlright. Get him gurl!\n<sep>\nEfficient lol"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution. I need to look at:\n\n1. Tone and writing style\n2. Punctuation patterns\n3. Message content and context\n4. Word choice and expressions\n5. Language patterns\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- \"Love the reference. Who's the rancor?\" - casual, asking about a reference\n- \"Yarrow\" - single word\n- \"Insufferable\" - single word\n- \"Haha I meant who in here is he referencing as the rancor. I know what the rancor is.\" - clarifying, uses \"Haha\", casual tone\n- \"All snap chat is lol\" - casual, uses \"lol\"\n- \"So wholesome stich!\" - positive comment, misspells \"stitch\" as \"stich\"\n- \"Well not for me!\" - short, exclamatory\n- \"Also I'm glad you say you seem to have found some of that with this group. I don't share that particular experience but that's ok. I am always willing to chat more though if you'd like.\" - longer, more thoughtful message, supportive tone\n- \"Buhahaha!\" - laughing expression\n- \"Haha I meant who in here is he referencing as the rancor. I know what the rancor is.\" - exact duplicate of earlier message\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- Long supportive message about finding groups and relating to people - very encouraging, thoughtful tone\n- \"?use calculator\" - command/query\n- \"365\" - number\n- \"363\" - number \n- \"So wholesome stich!\" - exact same message as in Set 1, including the same misspelling \"stich\"\n- \"Damn it James!n\" - has an extra \"n\" at the end, seems like a typo\n- \"Oral\" - single word\n- Very long message about struggling to engage partner in interests - thoughtful, personal, well-structured\n- \"Alright.\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nLove the reference. Who's the rancor?\n<sep>\nYarrow\n<sep>\nInsufferable\n<sep>\nHaha I meant who in here is he referencing as the rancor. I know what the rancor is.\n<sep>\nAll snap chat is lol\n<sep>\nSo wholesome stich!\n<sep>\nWell not for me!\n<sep>\nAlso I'm glad you say you seem to have found some of that with this group. I don't share that particular experience but that's ok. I am always willing to chat more though if you'd like.\n<sep>\nBuhahaha!\n<sep>\nHaha I meant who in here is he referencing as the rancor. I know what the rancor is.\n\nSet 2:\nI almost died when I played last week. My cardio so bad rn\n<sep>\nhttps://x.com/ArcainiLuke/status/1924804622482325574\n\nDed\n<sep>\nTatum didn't play\n<sep>\nThink I can score with the rim up\n<sep>\nGonna quit my job and collect UE for the summer\n<sep>\nThanks I am, how are you\n<sep>\nThe vanilla ones\n<sep>\nThink I can score with the rim up\n<sep>\nCrazy is my favorite wym\n<sep>\nI don't feel like wiping. I'm just gonna pull my pants up and hope for the bedt"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"Love the reference. Who's the rancor?\" - asks about a reference, using \"Who's\"\n- \"Yarrow\" - single word\n- \"Insufferable\" - single word\n- \"Haha I meant who in here is he referencing as the rancor. I know what the rancor is.\" - clarification, starts with \"Haha\", explains what they meant\n- \"All snap chat is lol\" - casual tone, uses \"lol\"\n- \"So wholesome stich!\" - typo \"stich\" instead of \"stitch\", exclamation mark\n- \"Well not for me!\" - short response with exclamation\n- \"Also I'm glad you say you seem to have found some of that with this group. I don't share that particular experience but that's ok. I am always willing to chat more though if you'd like.\" - longer, more thoughtful message, polite tone\n- \"Buhahaha!\" - unique laugh spelling\n- \"Haha I meant who in here is he referencing as the rancor. I know what the rancor is.\" - exact duplicate of earlier message\n\nSet 2:\n- \"I almost died when I played last week. My cardio so bad rn\" - casual, uses \"rn\" abbreviation\n- \"https://x.com/ArcainiLuke/status/1924804622482325574\\n\\nDed\" - shares link, says \"Ded\" (slang for dead)\n- \"Tatum didn't play\" - short factual statement\n- \"Think I can score with the rim up\" - casual basketball reference\n- \"Gonna quit my job and collect UE for the summer\" - casual, uses \"Gonna\", mentions unemployment benefits\n- \"Thanks I am, how are you\" - polite response\n- \"The vanilla ones\" - short response\n- \"Think I can score with the rim up\" - exact duplicate\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nSugo yes or no ur country is on the travel advisor or do not travel list by my USA country\n<sep>\nOk well u need to talk to ur doctor about sugar wall treatments\n<sep>\nYes India Pakistan have a war recently 2 week ago and trump step in say no more cuz Pakistan was winning\n<sep>\nThen I did u no middle school and hi school in a building 7-12\n<sep>\nAnd he’s how older then u or younger\n<sep>\nWat nation ur from goat\n<sep>\nFor half my life summer I smoke on marijuana even when I’m went army and u no y? It’s ez\n<sep>\nU ladies act so ooo so willing\n<sep>\nAnd I say please sir I must stop and sit\n<sep>\nImagine u stop reading for 5 years say ooo anyone who reads it’s just not 4 me\n\nSet 2:\nThen the time come u say ooo nooo\n<sep>\nDid u watch it wen u were kid\n<sep>\nDid u watch it wen u were kid\n<sep>\nFor half my life summer I smoke on marijuana even when I’m went army and u no y? It’s ez\n<sep>\nSummer u just weak I guess???\n<sep>\nNo moose\n<sep>\nThey r the sacrifice for their music industry\n<sep>\nU saw Pakistan just beat India up so bad trump had to say no more war?\n<sep>\nSorry I’m non gay status\n<sep>\nThey r the sacrifice for their music industry"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing style, tone, grammar, and content of both sets of messages.\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- Very informal, colloquial writing style\n- Frequent use of \"u\" instead of \"you\"\n- Poor grammar and spelling (e.g., \"ur\", \"wen\", \"no\" for \"know\")\n- Specific topics mentioned: travel advisory, sugar wall treatments, India-Pakistan war with Trump involvement, marijuana use in army, \"goat\" as a term of address\n- Distinctive phrase: \"For half my life summer I smoke on marijuana even when I'm went army and u no y? It's ez\"\n- Uses \"ooo\" as an expression\n- Informal, somewhat stream-of-consciousness style\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- Same informal style with \"u\" instead of \"you\"\n- Same poor grammar patterns (\"wen\", \"r\" for \"are\")\n- Uses \"ooo\" expression again (\"ooo nooo\")\n- Exact same phrase appears: \"For half my life summer I smoke on marijuana even when I'm went army and u no y? It's ez\"\n- Similar topic about Pakistan beating India with Trump intervention\n- Same informal, fragmented communication style\n- Uses \"r\" for \"are\" consistently\n- Similar overall tone and voice\n\nKey similarities:\n1. The exact same sentence appears in both sets: \"For half my life summer I smoke on marijuana even when I'm went army and u no y? It's ez\"\n2. Both mention the India-Pakistan conflict with Trump's involvement\n3. Both use the same spelling shortcuts and grammar patterns\n4. Both use \"ooo\" as an expression\n5. Both have the same informal, stream-of-consciousness style\n6. Both use \"u\", \"ur\", \"wen\", \"r\" consistently\n\nThe identical sentence about marijuana and army service is a very strong indicator, as it's quite specific and distinctive. The consistent grammar patterns, spelling shortcuts, and informal tone across both sets strongly suggest the same author.\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nSugo yes or no ur country is on the travel advisor or do not travel list by my USA country\n<sep>\nOk well u need to talk to ur doctor about sugar wall treatments\n<sep>\nYes India Pakistan have a war recently 2 week ago and trump step in say no more cuz Pakistan was winning\n<sep>\nThen I did u no middle school and hi school in a building 7-12\n<sep>\nAnd he’s how older then u or younger\n<sep>\nWat nation ur from goat\n<sep>\nFor half my life summer I smoke on marijuana even when I’m went army and u no y? It’s ez\n<sep>\nU ladies act so ooo so willing\n<sep>\nAnd I say please sir I must stop and sit\n<sep>\nImagine u stop reading for 5 years say ooo anyone who reads it’s just not 4 me\n\nSet 2:\nI've basically zero desire to drink anymore too\n<sep>\nI was drinking that daily LOL\n<sep>\nI want steak and chips but my oven needs repair\n<sep>\nWe totally did\n<sep>\n🖋️ vs 🖊️\n<sep>\nDude on right kinda looks like me\n<sep>\nOh Claire.....\n<sep>\nWe out here\n<sep>\nHow thick is that bad boy?\n<sep>\nThank fucking Christ"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing styles of these two sets of messages.\n\nSet 1:\n- Very poor grammar and spelling (\"Sugo yes or no ur country\", \"wat nation ur from goat\", \"And he's how older then u\", \"u no y\")\n- Uses \"u\" instead of \"you\" consistently\n- Very informal, sometimes incoherent writing\n- Talks about serious topics like war, travel advisories, medical treatments in a very casual/broken way\n- Uses phrases like \"goat\" as an address\n- Grammar is often broken or confusing (\"Then I did u no middle school and hi school in a building 7-12\")\n- Content seems scattered and sometimes hard to follow\n\nSet 2:\n- Much better grammar and spelling\n- Uses proper punctuation and capitalization\n- Uses full words instead of abbreviations (doesn't use \"u\" for \"you\")\n- More coherent sentence structure\n- Uses modern slang appropriately (\"We out here\", \"Thank fucking Christ\")\n- Content is more conversational and easier to follow\n- Uses emojis in a more conventional way\n- Overall much more literate writing style\n\nThe writing styles are dramatically different. Set 1 shows very poor writing skills with heavy use of text speak and broken grammar, while Set 2 shows much more standard English writing with proper grammar and spelling. The tone and vocabulary are also quite different - Set 1 seems more erratic and harder to follow, while Set 2 is more casual but coherent.\n\nThese appear to be from different authors.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nhttps://tenor.com/view/hoecat-girl-milk-gif-18435558690713733572\n<sep>\nWe should just officially list this place as an LGBTQ server on Disboard at this point.\n<sep>\nI like self emoting because of how retarded it is.\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/hoecat-girl-milk-gif-18435558690713733572\n<sep>\nSadly if you search for milkers on Tenor not all the gifs are so appealing... https://tenor.com/view/%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%87-gifkaro-%E0%B2%A8%E0%B2%AE%E0%B2%B8%E0%B3%8D%E0%B2%A4%E0%B3%86-movie-scene-scene-gif-20804999\n<sep>\nI am irrational, emotionally volatile, and completely unwilling to take any responsibility. So I basically count as a woman. <a:shyyy:1223500270449721377>\n<sep>\n<:luvazn:1282939731948343308>\n<sep>\nThis'll be a great story to tell the grandkids someday. \"The first few dates I brought a gun. I mostly wanted to do laundry at her place.\"\n<sep>\nIt's okay for me to say. Because while I may not be literally a woman...\n<sep>\nPlus I temporarily have access to so many rancid gifs.\n\nSet 2:\nIt seems like becoming a volunteer science experiment to me.\n<sep>\n90% of them are short, fat, and shapeless.\n<sep>\nSomething strange about his looks. Pretty boy in a sort of gay way.\n<sep>\nIt's okay for me to say. Because while I may not be literally a woman...\n<sep>\nI think it's going to look worse and worse with time. Even places like UK are turning against hormones and surgeries because the long-term study outcomes were bad.\n<sep>\nIt seems like becoming a volunteer science experiment to me.\n<sep>\nProbably in some weird Belgian way TBH.\n<sep>\nSadly if you search for milkers on Tenor not all the gifs are so appealing... https://tenor.com/view/%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%87-gifkaro-%E0%B2%A8%E0%B2%AE%E0%B2%B8%E0%B3%8D%E0%B2%A4%E0%B3%86-movie-scene-scene-gif-20804999\n<sep>\nLast option for all KKers.\n<sep>\nSomething strange about his looks. Pretty boy in a sort of gay way."
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze both sets of messages for writing style, tone, punctuation, content, and other characteristics.\n\nSet 1:\n- Uses Discord-style content (emotes, server references, LGBTQ server mention)\n- Includes repeated GIF links (hoecat-girl-milk gif appears twice)\n- Contains self-deprecating humor (\"I am irrational, emotionally volatile...\")\n- Uses offensive language casually (\"retarded\")\n- Mixed content ranging from Discord server discussion to personal anecdotes\n- Mentions \"milkers\" and provides same specific Tenor gif link as in Set 2\n- Has a specific phrase \"It's okay for me to say. Because while I may not be literally a woman...\"\n- Includes Discord emotes: <a:shyyy:1223500270449721377> and <:luvazn:1282939731948343308>\n- Contains a story about dates and bringing a gun\n- Writing style is casual, irreverent, somewhat edgy\n\nSet 2:\n- More focused on specific topics (appears to be about transgender issues, physical descriptions)\n- Contains the exact same phrase: \"It's okay for me to say. Because while I may not be literally a woman...\"\n- Contains the exact same link: \"Sadly if you search for milkers on Tenor not all the gifs are so appealing... https://tenor.com/view/%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%87-gifkaro-%E0%B2%A8%E0%B2%AE%E0%B2%B8%E0%B3%8D%E0%B2%A4%E0%B3%86-movie-scene-scene-gif-20804999\"\n- Repeated messages: \"It seems like becoming a volunteer science experiment to me.\" appears twice\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nhttps://tenor.com/view/hoecat-girl-milk-gif-18435558690713733572\n<sep>\nWe should just officially list this place as an LGBTQ server on Disboard at this point.\n<sep>\nI like self emoting because of how retarded it is.\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/hoecat-girl-milk-gif-18435558690713733572\n<sep>\nSadly if you search for milkers on Tenor not all the gifs are so appealing... https://tenor.com/view/%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%87-gifkaro-%E0%B2%A8%E0%B2%AE%E0%B2%B8%E0%B3%8D%E0%B2%A4%E0%B3%86-movie-scene-scene-gif-20804999\n<sep>\nI am irrational, emotionally volatile, and completely unwilling to take any responsibility. So I basically count as a woman. <a:shyyy:1223500270449721377>\n<sep>\n<:luvazn:1282939731948343308>\n<sep>\nThis'll be a great story to tell the grandkids someday. \"The first few dates I brought a gun. I mostly wanted to do laundry at her place.\"\n<sep>\nIt's okay for me to say. Because while I may not be literally a woman...\n<sep>\nPlus I temporarily have access to so many rancid gifs.\n\nSet 2:\nShe said how I would get a job that involves me working with my hands in 3 to 4 months, then boom, I start working in painting in October\n<sep>\nIt’s all I’m good at\n<sep>\nEveryone my age is out there thriving and succeeding and I’m doing nothing but messing up\n<sep>\nOh god\n<sep>\nYes\n<sep>\nBut I feel like I just hit a brick wall\n<sep>\nEmma fuck off\n<sep>\nBut I feel like I just hit a brick wall\n<sep>\nI just read everyone’s replies to what they were doing at 20\n<sep>\nNo I’m really stressed out"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution.\n\nSet 1:\n- Shares adult-oriented GIFs (hoecat girl milk gif)\n- Makes comments about LGBTQ servers and Disboard\n- Uses self-deprecating humor about being \"retarded\"\n- References \"milkers\" and searches on Tenor\n- Makes a controversial joke about identifying as a woman due to being \"irrational, emotionally volatile, and completely unwilling to take any responsibility\"\n- Uses custom emotes like <a:shyyy:1223500270449721377> and <:luvazn:1282939731948343308>\n- Makes a humorous story about bringing a gun on dates and wanting to do laundry\n- References having \"access to so many rancid gifs\"\n- Overall tone is crude, humorous, provocative, and somewhat edgy\n- Writing style is casual and conversational\n- Uses longer, more complete sentences\n\nSet 2:\n- Talks about a job prediction that came true (working with hands, painting job in October)\n- Expresses self-doubt and feelings of inadequacy\n- Compares themselves negatively to peers their age\n- Shows stress and anxiety about their situation\n- Uses shorter, more fragmented sentences\n- Says \"Emma fuck off\" \n- Repeats the phrase \"But I feel like I just hit a brick wall\"\n- Shows vulnerability and emotional distress\n- Much more serious, anxious tone\n- Less sophisticated vocabulary and sentence structure\n\nAnalysis:\nThe writing styles are quite different:\n\n1. Tone: Set 1 is edgy, humorous, and provocative while Set 2 is anxious, vulnerable, and self-deprecating in a more serious way.\n\n2. Content: Set 1 focuses on adult humor, GIFs, and provocative jokes while Set 2 is about personal struggles, job issues, and comparing oneself to peers.\n\n3. Sentence structure: Set 1 uses longer, more complete sentences while Set 2 uses shorter, more fragmented expressions.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nHad it already done\n<sep>\nBUBBLES QUEEN\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/sanji-gentleman-one-piece-gif-18750221\n<sep>\nInteresting\n<sep>\nPee behind the tree\n<sep>\nI'm honored\n<sep>\nI'm honored\n<sep>\n<:catttt:1374593697072545922>\n<sep>\nRight pookie\n<sep>\nAhhhh<:A_SB_Smirk:1339384831569694841>\n\nSet 2:\nIt's gonna be funnnn\n<sep>\nNeed my pookie tummy\n<sep>\nLol\n<sep>\nThe little cat one\n<sep>\nShe drank all my bong water\n<sep>\nLmaoooooo\n<sep>\nLike ew\n<sep>\nYesssss\n<sep>\nOooooooo interesting ash\n<sep>\nOof"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"Had it already done\" - casual, informal\n- \"BUBBLES QUEEN\" - all caps, playful\n- \"https://tenor.com/view/sanji-gentleman-one-piece-gif-18750221\" - sharing a gif\n- \"Interesting\" - simple response\n- \"Pee behind the tree\" - crude/playful humor\n- \"I'm honored\" (repeated twice) - formal phrase but context seems casual\n- \"<:catttt:1374593697072545922>\" - emoji/emoticon usage\n- \"Right pookie\" - uses \"pookie\" as endearment\n- \"Ahhhh<:A_SB_Smirk:1339384831569694841>\" - elongated expression with emoji\n\nSet 2:\n- \"It's gonna be funnnn\" - elongated letters for emphasis\n- \"Need my pookie tummy\" - uses \"pookie\" again as endearment\n- \"Lol\" - standard internet abbreviation\n- \"The little cat one\" - casual reference\n- \"She drank all my bong water\" - crude humor about drugs\n- \"Lmaoooooo\" - elongated laughter with extra letters\n- \"Like ew\" - casual disgust expression\n- \"Yesssss\" - elongated agreement\n- \"Oooooooo interesting ash\" - elongated expression, uses \"ash\" (possibly short for a name)\n- \"Oof\" - casual expression\n\nSimilarities I notice:\n1. Both sets use \"pookie\" as an endearment term (Set 1: \"Right pookie\", Set 2: \"Need my pookie tummy\")\n2. Both use elongated letters for emphasis (Set 1: \"Ahhhh\", Set 2: \"funnnn\", \"Lmaoooooo\", \"Yesssss\", \"Oooooooo\")\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nHad it already done\n<sep>\nBUBBLES QUEEN\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/sanji-gentleman-one-piece-gif-18750221\n<sep>\nInteresting\n<sep>\nPee behind the tree\n<sep>\nI'm honored\n<sep>\nI'm honored\n<sep>\n<:catttt:1374593697072545922>\n<sep>\nRight pookie\n<sep>\nAhhhh<:A_SB_Smirk:1339384831569694841>\n\nSet 2:\nbut me hab backup for my flat\n<sep>\ndamn i got chocos after like 10 years\n<sep>\n<a:BE_Nod:662221368833605652>\n<sep>\nyes\n<sep>\nit has reduced\n<sep>\nwhat that <:Awoo:626196333732298752>\n<sep>\ncause im awesome\n<sep>\nthey are nice to me\n<sep>\nwhy are chinese peeps so nice\n<sep>\nold man things"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze both sets of messages to determine if they're from the same author or different authors.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"Had it already done\" - Simple past statement\n- \"BUBBLES QUEEN\" - All caps, casual expression\n- A link to a Tenor GIF (Sanji gentleman One Piece)\n- \"Interesting\" - One word response\n- \"Pee behind the tree\" - Very casual, childish humor\n- \"I'm honored\" (repeated twice) - Polite response\n- An emoji/emote: \"<:catttt:1374593697072545922>\"\n- \"Right pookie\" - Using pet name \"pookie\", casual\n- \"Ahhhh<:A_SB_Smirk:1339384831569694841>\" - Expression with custom Discord emote\n\nSet 2:\n- \"but me hab backup for my flat\" - Intentionally broken English (\"me hab\" instead of \"I have\"), playful baby talk\n- \"damn i got chocos after like 10 years\" - lowercase, casual, \"chocos\" instead of \"chocolates\"\n- \"<a:BE_Nod:662221368833605652>\" - Custom Discord emote\n- \"yes\" - lowercase, simple response\n- \"it has reduced\" - Simple statement\n- \"what that <:Awoo:626196333732298752>\" - Broken grammar, emote\n- \"cause im awesome\" - lowercase, casual confidence\n- \"they are nice to me\" - Simple statement\n- \"why are chinese peeps so nice\" - lowercase, casual question using \"peeps\"\n- \"old man things\" - casual phrase\n\nKey differences I notice:\n\n1. Capitalization: Set 1 shows proper capitalization in most messages (\"Had it already done\", \"Interesting\", \"I'm honored\"), while Set 2 is consistently lowercase except for the beginning of some sentences.\n\n2. Grammar style: Set 1 uses proper grammar mostly, while Set 2 frequently uses intentionally broken or casual grammar (\"me hab\", \"what that\", \"cause im\").\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nU too\n<sep>\nFr gang\n<sep>\n!!!!\n<sep>\nCrit!\n<sep>\nLucky duck\n<sep>\nIt’s been a while\n<sep>\nAnd they can’t do anything about the 2016 video cuz statute of limitations\n<sep>\nHiiii\n<sep>\nWorkkk\n<sep>\nAgreed lmao\n\nSet 2:\nGot that from suits\n<sep>\nWhich sucks\n<sep>\nDamn\n<sep>\nCrit!\n<sep>\nBye James\n<sep>\nHaven’t seen u in a hot minute\n<sep>\nCuz his stupid ass made movies when they were kids\n<sep>\nI blame him for the way millennials are\n<sep>\nThe stripper said he didn’t last long either😭\n<sep>\nLike bruh"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages to see if they're from the same author.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"U too\" - casual abbreviation\n- \"Fr gang\" - uses \"fr\" (for real) and \"gang\" slang\n- \"!!!!\" - multiple exclamation marks\n- \"Crit!\" - exclamation, possibly gaming/technical term\n- \"Lucky duck\" - casual expression\n- \"It's been a while\" - complete sentence, casual\n- \"And they can't do anything about the 2016 video cuz statute of limitations\" - longer sentence with \"cuz\" abbreviation\n- \"Hiiii\" - extended greeting with multiple i's\n- \"Workkk\" - extended word with multiple k's\n- \"Agreed lmao\" - uses \"lmao\" internet slang\n\nSet 2:\n- \"Got that from suits\" - casual, incomplete sentence\n- \"Which sucks\" - casual, negative expression\n- \"Damn\" - casual exclamation\n- \"Crit!\" - same exclamation as Set 1\n- \"Bye James\" - addressing someone by name\n- \"Haven't seen u in a hot minute\" - uses \"u\" abbreviation, \"hot minute\" slang\n- \"Cuz his stupid ass made movies when they were kids\" - uses \"cuz\" abbreviation, casual profanity\n- \"I blame him for the way millennials are\" - complete sentence, casual opinion\n- \"The stripper said he didn't last long either😭\" - uses emoji, casual/crude content\n- \"Like bruh\" - uses \"bruh\" slang\n\nSimilarities:\n1. Both use \"Crit!\" - exact same expression\n2. Both use \"cuz\" instead of \"because\"\n3. Both use \"u\" instead of \"you\"\n4. Similar casual, informal tone throughout\n5. Use of internet slang (lmao, bruh, fr)\n6. Extended letters for emphasis (Hiiii, Workkk)\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nThis'll be a great story to tell the grandkids someday. \"The first few dates I brought a gun. I mostly wanted to do laundry at her place.\"\n<sep>\nProbably in some weird Belgian way TBH.\n<sep>\nhttps://media.discordapp.net/attachments/1205301620506632262/1344770291800473610/BAE15F77-CB35-4D99-8B1E-147F8C37F542.gif?ex=682e396e&is=682ce7ee&hm=625c3f2599a9e465c4e110460dae7dd82f3c676046094d7d3aa4535a09319e6a&=&width=218&height=384\n<sep>\nProbably in some weird Belgian way TBH.\n<sep>\nEww... Imagine giving a woman what she wants.\n<sep>\nWe should just officially list this place as an LGBTQ server on Disboard at this point.\n<sep>\nWho knows what the effects are going to be over the decades doe.\n<sep>\n90% of them are short, fat, and shapeless.\n<sep>\nSend her this when she gets mouthy. https://tenor.com/view/latinx-calm-down-ui-gif-9033828531505586051\n<sep>\nWho knows what the effects are going to be over the decades doe.\n\nSet 2:\nSend her this when she gets mouthy. https://tenor.com/view/latinx-calm-down-ui-gif-9033828531505586051\n<sep>\nLast option for all KKers.\n<sep>\nIn birth I guess.\n<sep>\nSheesh.\n<sep>\n<a:lonespartanz_spin:1263276314979471481>\n<sep>\nI am irrational, emotionally volatile, and completely unwilling to take any responsibility. So I basically count as a woman. <a:shyyy:1223500270449721377>\n<sep>\nI like self emoting because of how retarded it is.\n<sep>\nSadly if you search for milkers on Tenor not all the gifs are so appealing... https://tenor.com/view/%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%87-gifkaro-%E0%B2%A8%E0%B2%AE%E0%B2%B8%E0%B3%8D%E0%B2%A4%E0%B3%86-movie-scene-scene-gif-20804999\n<sep>\nSheesh.\n<sep>\nHe looks ridic here... https://people.com/thmb/XNXSSVXZZTvyTxCO9w32jRnPPrc=/1107x1200/filters:fill(auto,1)/lucky-blue-smith-1883d49c5c77421f9a4e0ff3db32fc6b.jpg"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze both sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author.\n\nLooking at Set 1:\n1. \"This'll be a great story to tell the grandkids someday. \"The first few dates I brought a gun. I mostly wanted to do laundry at her place.\"\" - This is a humorous, somewhat crude story told in a conversational tone\n2. \"Probably in some weird Belgian way TBH.\" - Casual tone, uses \"TBH\" abbreviation\n3. A Discord GIF link\n4. \"Probably in some weird Belgian way TBH.\" - Exact repetition of message 2\n5. \"Eww... Imagine giving a woman what she wants.\" - Sarcastic, somewhat misogynistic tone\n6. \"We should just officially list this place as an LGBTQ server on Disboard at this point.\" - Commentary about the server\n7. \"Who knows what the effects are going to be over the decades doe.\" - Uses \"doe\" instead of \"though\"\n8. \"90% of them are short, fat, and shapeless.\" - Derogatory comment\n9. \"Send her this when she gets mouthy. [tenor link]\" - Sharing a GIF with commentary\n10. \"Who knows what the effects are going to be over the decades doe.\" - Exact repetition of message 7\n\nLooking at Set 2:\n1. \"Send her this when she gets mouthy. [tenor link]\" - Exact match with Set 1, message 9\n2. \"Last option for all KKers.\" - Short comment\n3. \"In birth I guess.\" - Short response\n4. \"Sheesh.\" - Single word reaction\n5. Discord emoji/emote\n6. \"I am irrational, emotionally volatile, and completely unwilling to take any responsibility. So I basically count as a woman. [emote]\" - Self-deprecating humor with misogynistic undertones\n7. \"I like self emoting because of how retarded it is.\" - Uses outdated/offensive language casually\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nThis'll be a great story to tell the grandkids someday. \"The first few dates I brought a gun. I mostly wanted to do laundry at her place.\"\n<sep>\nProbably in some weird Belgian way TBH.\n<sep>\nhttps://media.discordapp.net/attachments/1205301620506632262/1344770291800473610/BAE15F77-CB35-4D99-8B1E-147F8C37F542.gif?ex=682e396e&is=682ce7ee&hm=625c3f2599a9e465c4e110460dae7dd82f3c676046094d7d3aa4535a09319e6a&=&width=218&height=384\n<sep>\nProbably in some weird Belgian way TBH.\n<sep>\nEww... Imagine giving a woman what she wants.\n<sep>\nWe should just officially list this place as an LGBTQ server on Disboard at this point.\n<sep>\nWho knows what the effects are going to be over the decades doe.\n<sep>\n90% of them are short, fat, and shapeless.\n<sep>\nSend her this when she gets mouthy. https://tenor.com/view/latinx-calm-down-ui-gif-9033828531505586051\n<sep>\nWho knows what the effects are going to be over the decades doe.\n\nSet 2:\nfor as long as the there has a been a veil and humans haven't been auto-born with the ability to see ghosts and the spirit realm, there has been \"spirituality\" which is just a greek term for \"the reality of spiritus\"\n<sep>\nok here we go found it\n<sep>\n\"friends\" 💀\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/bachata-couples-gif-26890749\n<sep>\nno more just like an example of some being from another space, outside looking in u gno\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/whirlpool-sucked-in-trap-help-me-falling-gif-13586720\n<sep>\ncompression, release, etc etc\n<sep>\nbut that's backwards\n<sep>\ndifferent ways to visualize the energy exchange without actually having powers of sight\n<sep>\nhttps://discord.com/channels/539367976806383616/561504456534130688/1374399280831402016"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution.\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- Contains crude humor and sexist/misogynistic content (\"Eww... Imagine giving a woman what she wants\", \"90% of them are short, fat, and shapeless\", \"Send her this when she gets mouthy\")\n- Uses casual, sometimes edgy internet slang (\"TBH\", \"doe\" instead of \"though\")\n- Makes references to dating with guns, which suggests dark humor\n- Has repeated messages (\"Probably in some weird Belgian way TBH\" and \"Who knows what the effects are going to be over the decades doe\")\n- Tone is casual, irreverent, and sometimes offensive\n- Uses Discord links and GIFs\n- Writing style is informal with internet abbreviations\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- Much more philosophical and spiritual content (\"veil\", \"spirit realm\", \"spirituality\", \"energy exchange\")\n- Uses \"u\" instead of \"you\" and \"gno\" instead of \"know\" - different text speak patterns\n- Content is about metaphysical concepts rather than crude humor\n- Tone is more introspective and mystical\n- Still uses Discord links and GIFs\n- Writing style is also informal but focused on completely different topics\n- Uses quotes around \"friends\" with skull emoji, suggesting some cynicism\n- Language about \"beings from another space\" and spiritual concepts\n\nKey differences:\n1. Content focus: Set 1 is crude humor/misogyny vs Set 2 is spirituality/metaphysics\n2. Text speak patterns: Set 1 uses \"TBH\", \"doe\" vs Set 2 uses \"u\", \"gno\"\n3. Tone: Set 1 is offensive/edgy vs Set 2 is philosophical/mystical\n4. Topics: Completely different subject matters\n5. Language sophistication: Set 1 uses simpler language, Set 2 discusses more complex philosophical concepts\n\nWhile both use informal writing and Discord features, the fundamental differences in content, tone, vocabulary, and text speak patterns suggest these are different authors.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nor i think i have white yarn actually\n<sep>\n:3 yes 100%\n<sep>\ncan yall call in a bomb threat to my job?\n<sep>\ni’ll make it green so it’s like toxic waste sperm\n<sep>\nbut i couldn’t find it\n<sep>\ninshallah\n<sep>\ni’m ready and willing\n<sep>\ni’m on a boost cool down <:cry:1139748383637119047>\n<sep>\nthey hate beaners anyway\n<sep>\ni love wow wow wubzy\n\nSet 2:\nweak\n<sep>\ni’ll buy yarn next time i go into town\n<sep>\ninshallah\n<sep>\ncan yall call in a bomb threat to my job?\n<sep>\nrock on king, tell your truth\n<sep>\namen\n<sep>\nthey hate beaners anyway\n<sep>\ncan i have her number? for personal reasons\n<sep>\n<a:Z_A_Yippee:1339383501165690931>\n<sep>\nmemememme"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for writing style, tone, and content patterns.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"or i think i have white yarn actually\"\n- \":3 yes 100%\"\n- \"can yall call in a bomb threat to my job?\"\n- \"i'll make it green so it's like toxic waste sperm\"\n- \"but i couldn't find it\"\n- \"inshallah\"\n- \"i'm ready and willing\"\n- \"i'm on a boost cool down <:cry:1139748383637119047>\"\n- \"they hate beaners anyway\"\n- \"i love wow wow wubzy\"\n\nSet 2:\n- \"weak\"\n- \"i'll buy yarn next time i go into town\"\n- \"inshallah\"\n- \"can yall call in a bomb threat to my job?\"\n- \"rock on king, tell your truth\"\n- \"amen\"\n- \"they hate beaners anyway\"\n- \"can i have her number? for personal reasons\"\n- \"<a:Z_A_Yippee:1339383501165690931>\"\n- \"memememme\"\n\nKey observations:\n\n1. Writing style:\n- Both sets use lowercase text consistently\n- Both use casual, informal language\n- Both use internet slang and expressions\n\n2. Specific repeated phrases:\n- \"can yall call in a bomb threat to my job?\" appears in both sets (exact match)\n- \"they hate beaners anyway\" appears in both sets (exact match)\n- \"inshallah\" appears in both sets (exact match)\n\n3. Content themes:\n- Both reference yarn (Set 1: \"white yarn\", Set 2: \"buy yarn\")\n- Both use Discord emoji formatting\n- Both have similar casual, irreverent tone\n\n4. Language patterns:\n- Use of \"yall\" \n- Lowercase throughout\n- Similar casual register\n\n5. Specific identical messages:\nThree messages are exactly identical between the sets, which is a very strong indicator of same authorship, especially when combined with similar writing style patterns.\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nor i think i have white yarn actually\n<sep>\n:3 yes 100%\n<sep>\ncan yall call in a bomb threat to my job?\n<sep>\ni’ll make it green so it’s like toxic waste sperm\n<sep>\nbut i couldn’t find it\n<sep>\ninshallah\n<sep>\ni’m ready and willing\n<sep>\ni’m on a boost cool down <:cry:1139748383637119047>\n<sep>\nthey hate beaners anyway\n<sep>\ni love wow wow wubzy\n\nSet 2:\nHi Kla\n<sep>\nIt’s not!\n<sep>\nI *should* turn to God...\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/wwe-fan-going-crazy-screaming-screams-shouting-gif-14211602\n<sep>\nDon’t worry I’m here for you\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/01-gif-23830650\n<sep>\nDon't weaponize my wife's steroids\n<sep>\n<:KeK:978802916183920670>\n<sep>\n<:cat_stare:1299232280681775147>\n<sep>\n<uid>"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author.\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- Generally lowercase, informal style\n- Uses informal expressions like \"yall\", \"inshallah\"\n- Contains crude/offensive humor (\"toxic waste sperm\", racial slur)\n- Uses Discord emoticons like \"<:cry:1139748383637119047>\"\n- Very casual, stream-of-consciousness style\n- References pop culture (\"wow wow wubzy\")\n- Generally short, fragmented messages\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- More varied capitalization, some proper capitalization\n- Uses asterisks for emphasis (\"I *should* turn to God...\")\n- Shares GIFs/links (tenor.com links)\n- Uses Discord emoticons like \"<:KeK:978802916183920670>\" and \"<:cat_stare:1299232280681775147>\"\n- More conversational, addressing others directly (\"Hi Kla\", \"Don't worry I'm here for you\")\n- References to personal relationships (\"my wife's steroids\")\n- Generally more coherent sentence structure\n\nKey differences:\n1. Capitalization patterns - Set 1 is almost entirely lowercase, Set 2 has proper capitalization\n2. Tone - Set 1 is more crude/offensive, Set 2 is more supportive/conversational\n3. Content focus - Set 1 seems more random/crude, Set 2 is more social/interactive\n4. Writing style - Set 1 is more fragmented, Set 2 is more structured\n5. Communication style - Set 1 seems more self-focused, Set 2 is more other-focused\n\nBoth use Discord emoticons, which suggests they're from the same platform, but the writing styles, tones, and communication patterns are quite different. The capitalization patterns alone are a strong indicator of different authors - Set 1 consistently avoids capitalization while Set 2 uses proper capitalization.\n\nThe content and tone are also very different - Set 1 contains offensive language and crude humor, while Set 2 is more supportive and social.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nYes I am indeed blind 😭\n<sep>\nI’m so happy people are using my phrase rn 😂\n<sep>\nI just got the mandatory two\n<sep>\nIs it a mushroom <:food2:1317139002343559198>\n<sep>\nI just got the mandatory two\n<sep>\nI’ve know him a super long time and he’s always had my back through everything\n<sep>\nBut yeah I was raving about you this morning to ang and Miranda\n<sep>\nIs mad\n<sep>\nIdk why it corrected that to FUCKING CELEBRATING\n<sep>\nProbably\n\nSet 2:\nI have one I’ve known for 10 years on here\n<sep>\nThe amount of healthcare workers we lost bc they absolutely refused is sad\n<sep>\nIdk why it corrected that to FUCKING CELEBRATING\n<sep>\nFresh out\n<sep>\nIdk if you’ve listened to his other band but top tier <uid> https://open.spotify.com/track/2q4wn2sepCove7bf3TDZYD?si=H-g25xDxSf2RDYuZd5RYCw\n<sep>\nWhat did you eat <:FlorkDie:1004479789303869511>\n<sep>\nSTUPID FUCKING USELESS FUVKING AUTO COREEVTING CUNT\n<sep>\n😂\n<sep>\n😂\n<sep>\nThat’s fucking ridiculous"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for writing style, tone, punctuation, and content patterns.\n\nSet 1:\n- Uses emojis frequently (😭, 😂, <:food2:1317139002343559198>)\n- Casual, conversational tone\n- Uses \"I just got the mandatory two\" twice (repetition)\n- Has some autocorrect issues (\"Idk why it corrected that to FUCKING CELEBRATING\")\n- Mix of short and longer sentences\n- Uses \"rn\" abbreviation\n- Mentions specific people (ang, Miranda)\n- Generally positive/friendly tone with some humor\n\nSet 2:\n- Also uses emojis (😂, <:FlorkDie:1004479789303869511>)\n- Similar casual, conversational tone\n- EXACT same autocorrect complaint: \"Idk why it corrected that to FUCKING CELEBRATING\"\n- Uses \"Idk\" abbreviation\n- Has a very frustrated message about autocorrect with lots of swearing: \"STUPID FUCKING USELESS FUVKING AUTO COREEVTING CUNT\"\n- Mix of short responses and longer messages\n- Similar informal style\n\nKey similarities:\n1. The EXACT same complaint about autocorrect: \"Idk why it corrected that to FUCKING CELEBRATING\" appears in both sets\n2. Both use \"Idk\" abbreviation\n3. Both use emojis in similar ways\n4. Both have casual, informal tone\n5. Both show frustration with autocorrect/technology\n6. Similar sentence structure and flow\n\nThe exact repetition of the autocorrect complaint is a very strong indicator these are from the same person. This seems like too specific and unusual a phrase to be coincidental. The writing style, tone, and use of abbreviations/emojis is also very consistent between the sets.\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nYes I am indeed blind 😭\n<sep>\nI’m so happy people are using my phrase rn 😂\n<sep>\nI just got the mandatory two\n<sep>\nIs it a mushroom <:food2:1317139002343559198>\n<sep>\nI just got the mandatory two\n<sep>\nI’ve know him a super long time and he’s always had my back through everything\n<sep>\nBut yeah I was raving about you this morning to ang and Miranda\n<sep>\nIs mad\n<sep>\nIdk why it corrected that to FUCKING CELEBRATING\n<sep>\nProbably\n\nSet 2:\nOn my alt yaknow\n<sep>\nSmoke any mandems today innit?\n<sep>\nI dead ass scarred my dick, I'm pissed\n<sep>\n<uid> now we in it together homie 🫂\n<sep>\nLook at this sassy bitch. I saved his dumb ass from some long grass he was tangled in.\n<sep>\nHow tf you get 1 coin\n<sep>\nThere's a turtle channel? Lmao\n<sep>\nMy friend hates me and won't join my emoji server so she can use it as a reason to keep me out of hers <:lilguy:1349941269027360829>\n<sep>\n<:dinoblanket:1374106929760305204>\n<sep>\nI was gonna say something really cute in dms but then you decided to go to some other bitches dms 😡"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution. I need to look at:\n\n1. Tone and writing style\n2. Punctuation patterns\n3. Language choices\n4. Emoji usage\n5. Grammar and spelling\n6. Overall personality/voice\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- Uses crying laughing emojis (😭, 😂)\n- More conventional language and sentence structure\n- Uses \"I'm so happy people are using my phrase rn\"\n- \"I just got the mandatory two\" (appears twice)\n- \"I've know him a super long time\" (grammar error: \"I've known\")\n- \"But yeah I was raving about you this morning to ang and Miranda\"\n- \"Idk why it corrected that to FUCKING CELEBRATING\"\n- Uses custom Discord emojis like <:food2:1317139002343559198>\n- Generally more articulate and coherent\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- Uses very different slang: \"innit\", \"mandems\", \"dead ass\"\n- More crude language: \"I dead ass scarred my dick, I'm pissed\"\n- Different emoji usage patterns\n- \"Look at this sassy bitch. I saved his dumb ass from some long grass he was tangled in.\"\n- \"How tf you get 1 coin\"\n- \"My friend hates me and won't join my emoji server so she can use it as a reason to keep me out of hers\"\n- \"I was gonna say something really cute in dms but then you decided to go to some other bitches dms 😡\"\n- Uses different custom Discord emojis\n- More informal, uses \"tf\" instead of \"the fuck\"\n- Different relationship dynamics described\n\nKey differences:\n1. Language style: Set 1 uses more standard English, Set 2 uses more slang and crude language\n2. Emoji preferences: Different patterns and choices\n3. Grammar: Set 1 has some errors but generally better structure, Set 2 is more casual\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nI want to feel special, not like another patient 🫨\n<sep>\nI think it’s just the right amount. Resident Evil movies did the more violence compared to game and destroyed it\n<sep>\nI know! \nI get around 300 a day and if I don’t review thoroughly I can miss something important\n<sep>\nWhere does the || made you look || go 😳\n<sep>\nYou are not! You are DBG!\n<sep>\nBe back real soon\n<sep>\nFucked…\nYou off\n\nThis sounds oddly satisfying though\n<sep>\nAren’t you giving me a tour tonight 😳\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/henya-vshojo-head-pat-henya-the-genius-gif-5780512133190649381\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/uhh-negative-wheezer-skymed-204-that%27s-a-negative-gif-8495504445417449083\n\nSet 2:\nHewo\n<sep>\nIm gonna try and go to the next sd meet\n<sep>\nYee\n<sep>\nAnd pantsless people\n<sep>\nCustom made\n<sep>\nIm not fat and hairy\n<sep>\n<:Hewo:1338309381246287984>\n<sep>\nToo heavy to be a buttplug\n<sep>\nIm the bluegooncoon\n<sep>\nThats not a bad car. Why is yours so unreliable?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze both sets of messages to determine if they're from the same author.\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- Uses emojis frequently (🫨, 😳)\n- Mix of casual and slightly more complex sentences\n- References to gaming (Resident Evil movies/games)\n- Professional context mentioned (300 emails a day, reviewing things)\n- Uses GIFs/links to Tenor\n- Casual/internet slang (\"Fucked... You off\")\n- Question structure with emojis\n- References to \"DBG\"\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- Uses \"Hewo\" (internet/furry slang greeting)\n- Very short, casual responses (\"Yee\")\n- References to \"sd meet\" (possibly furry/gaming meetup)\n- Crude humor (\"buttplug\", \"pantsless people\")\n- Uses Discord emoji format <:Hewo:1338309381246287984>\n- \"Im the bluegooncoon\" (furry reference)\n- Simple, direct questions\n- Less punctuation overall\n- More abbreviated language (\"Im\" instead of \"I'm\")\n\nComparing the two sets:\n\nSimilarities:\n- Both use casual internet language\n- Both reference online culture\n- Both use some crude/sexual humor\n- Both ask questions\n\nDifferences:\n- Set 1 uses more standard emojis, Set 2 uses more niche internet slang\n- Set 1 has more professional references, Set 2 is purely casual\n- Set 1 uses proper capitalization more often\n- Set 2 has more furry community references\n- Writing style is noticeably different - Set 1 is more varied in sentence structure, Set 2 is more abbreviated\n- Set 1 uses more punctuation\n- Set 2 uses more internet abbreviations\n\nThe tone and style feel quite different. Set 1 seems like someone who might be older or in a professional setting (mentions reviewing 300 emails), while Set 2 seems like someone more embedded in furry/gaming communities with very casual typing habits.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nTrust me\n<sep>\n3-0 tho\n<sep>\nUnable to play\n<sep>\nI'm joining as a guest @kla\n<sep>\nFree beer with the fellas\n<sep>\nNeed man city to score 1 more goal lads\n<sep>\nShift\n<sep>\nI'll remember\n<sep>\nSimon is pathetic\n<sep>\nYeah\n\nSet 2:\nBalaclava up on a granny\n<sep>\nCan we discuss my barber?\n<sep>\nThat's a sod\n<sep>\nLife\n<sep>\nYup\n<sep>\nWe going live Sunday\n<sep>\nWhat's Leon gonna do? Post my pics of him and delete it\n<sep>\nStill 2-0\n<sep>\nSame\n<sep>\nBetter than biden tho"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze both sets of messages to look for patterns in writing style, tone, content, and expression.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"Trust me\" - short, casual\n- \"3-0 tho\" - sports score, casual slang (\"tho\")\n- \"Unable to play\" - formal tone, brief\n- \"I'm joining as a guest @kla\" - casual, mentions someone by handle\n- \"Free beer with the fellas\" - casual, colloquial (\"fellas\")\n- \"Need man city to score 1 more goal lads\" - sports betting/watching context, British slang (\"lads\"), casual\n- \"Shift\" - very brief, unclear context\n- \"I'll remember\" - brief, somewhat ominous\n- \"Simon is pathetic\" - direct insult, casual\n- \"Yeah\" - very casual agreement\n\nSet 2:\n- \"Balaclava up on a granny\" - British slang, somewhat crude/edgy humor\n- \"Can we discuss my barber?\" - casual question\n- \"That's a sod\" - British slang/expression\n- \"Life\" - very brief, philosophical\n- \"Yup\" - casual agreement (similar to \"Yeah\" from Set 1)\n- \"We going live Sunday\" - casual, missing articles in speech pattern\n- \"What's Leon gonna do? Post my pics of him and delete it\" - casual, confrontational tone\n- \"Still 2-0\" - sports score (similar pattern to \"3-0 tho\")\n- \"Same\" - very brief response\n- \"Better than biden tho\" - political comment, casual with \"tho\" ending\n\nSimilarities I notice:\n1. Both use British slang and expressions (\"lads\", \"sod\", \"balaclava\")\n2. Both reference sports scores in similar format (\"3-0 tho\", \"Still 2-0\")\n3. Both use casual agreement words (\"Yeah\" vs \"Yup\")\n4. Both use \"tho\" as casual ending\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nTrust me\n<sep>\n3-0 tho\n<sep>\nUnable to play\n<sep>\nI'm joining as a guest @kla\n<sep>\nFree beer with the fellas\n<sep>\nNeed man city to score 1 more goal lads\n<sep>\nShift\n<sep>\nI'll remember\n<sep>\nSimon is pathetic\n<sep>\nYeah\n\nSet 2:\nThats ur problem\n<sep>\nWhich would fit\n<sep>\nHey chem\n<sep>\nyeah whenever someone says “I” or “me” in chat immediately reply with “SHUT UP BOT” l\n<sep>\nRooofl\n<sep>\nMy uncle is like 134 iq or thereabouts\n<sep>\nCringe\n<sep>\nOfc\n<sep>\nAn aid got her her coffee\n<sep>\nBarcelona isnt local friendly"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing style, tone, punctuation, and content of these two sets of messages.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"Trust me\" - short, confident\n- \"3-0 tho\" - casual, sports reference, uses \"tho\" \n- \"Unable to play\" - brief, matter-of-fact\n- \"I'm joining as a guest @kla\" - mentions joining something, uses @ mention\n- \"Free beer with the fellas\" - casual, social reference\n- \"Need man city to score 1 more goal lads\" - sports betting/watching reference, uses \"lads\"\n- \"Shift\" - single word, unclear context\n- \"I'll remember\" - brief response\n- \"Simon is pathetic\" - direct, somewhat harsh judgment\n- \"Yeah\" - simple agreement\n\nSet 2:\n- \"Thats ur problem\" - casual spelling \"Thats\" and \"ur\", dismissive tone\n- \"Which would fit\" - incomplete thought or response to something\n- \"Hey chem\" - greeting, possibly nickname\n- \"yeah whenever someone says \"I\" or \"me\" in chat immediately reply with \"SHUT UP BOT\" l\" - longer message, giving instructions, casual \"yeah\", typo at end \"l\"\n- \"Rooofl\" - extended version of \"rofl\", playful\n- \"My uncle is like 134 iq or thereabouts\" - personal information, casual phrasing \"like\" and \"thereabouts\"\n- \"Cringe\" - single word reaction\n- \"Ofc\" - abbreviation for \"of course\"\n- \"An aid got her her coffee\" - grammatical error \"her her\", casual observation\n- \"Barcelona isnt local friendly\" - missing apostrophe in \"isnt\", opinion about Barcelona\n\nLet me compare:\n\nSimilarities:\n- Both use casual language and abbreviations\n- Both have short, direct messages\n- Both seem to be in informal chat contexts\n- Both use some slang/informal terms\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\ncat\n<sep>\ncat\n<sep>\ncat\n<sep>\ngo suck cuckman off\n<sep>\nwe have for a while\n<sep>\nWait whay\n<sep>\nOh wjat flavour\n<sep>\ncat\n<sep>\nmuscular infemine ugly character\n<sep>\nam sat in vc on my own fuck this\n\nSet 2:\nyeah right cont\n<sep>\nwarm club soda wtf\n<sep>\nand you white trash like all of us here\n<sep>\nyeah sure\n<sep>\nYou're just not that guy anymore\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/the-last-of-us-the-last-of-us-two-ellabs-ellie-williams-abby-anderson-gif-10148039858015936601\n<sep>\nwhat tits\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/killa-escape-from-tarkov-tahanka-gif-26209233\n<sep>\ncat\n<sep>\nvc anyone"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for writing style, tone, and patterns.\n\nSet 1:\n- Multiple instances of just \"cat\"\n- Crude language: \"go suck cuckman off\"\n- Casual/informal tone: \"we have for a while\"\n- Typos/casual spelling: \"whay\" instead of \"what\", \"wjat\" instead of \"what\"\n- Gaming reference: \"muscular infemine ugly character\" (seems like a gaming complaint)\n- Casual complaint: \"am sat in vc on my own fuck this\"\n\nSet 2:\n- Casual/sarcastic: \"yeah right cont\"\n- Complaints: \"warm club soda wtf\"\n- Self-deprecating humor: \"and you white trash like all of us here\"\n- Dismissive: \"yeah sure\"\n- Gaming reference: \"You're just not that guy anymore\" \n- Links to gaming GIFs (Last of Us, Escape from Tarkov)\n- Same crude casual tone: \"what tits\"\n- Same \"cat\" pattern\n- Same casual request: \"vc anyone\"\n\nCommon patterns:\n1. Both use \"cat\" as a single word message\n2. Both have gaming references/culture\n3. Both use casual, crude language\n4. Both reference \"vc\" (voice chat)\n5. Similar informal tone and typos/casual spelling\n6. Both seem to be in some kind of gaming or Discord chat context\n\nThe writing style is very similar - informal, gaming-oriented, uses crude language casually, makes short comments, and has the same \"cat\" and \"vc\" references. The tone and communication style are consistent between both sets.\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\ncat\n<sep>\ncat\n<sep>\ncat\n<sep>\ngo suck cuckman off\n<sep>\nwe have for a while\n<sep>\nWait whay\n<sep>\nOh wjat flavour\n<sep>\ncat\n<sep>\nmuscular infemine ugly character\n<sep>\nam sat in vc on my own fuck this\n\nSet 2:\nI’ll show you.\n<sep>\nNibba what\n<sep>\nScraped it up.\n<sep>\nHUR HUR HUR.\n<sep>\nSchezuan too.\n<sep>\nWhatever, short lady smelled good.\n<sep>\nCocaine purity been going up in the UK apparently.\n<sep>\nJust like, on a Tuesday night.\n<sep>\nI am a fan of the NFL.\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/goosetheband-your-direction-mullets-dancing-desert-gif-11482032046469995948"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author.\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- Very short messages, mostly one word (\"cat\" appears multiple times)\n- Contains crude language (\"go suck cuckman off\")\n- Has typos/informal spelling (\"whay\" instead of \"what\", \"wjat\" instead of \"what\")\n- Informal, stream-of-consciousness style\n- Seems frustrated/annoyed in the last message (\"am sat in vc on my own fuck this\")\n- Very casual, possibly gaming-related context\n- Grammar is quite poor/informal\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- Also short messages but more varied in length\n- Uses \"Nibba\" (slang/informal)\n- More coherent sentences\n- References various topics (food, smells, cocaine, NFL, GIFs)\n- Uses \"HUR HUR HUR\" which suggests laughter\n- Generally better grammar and spelling\n- Includes a GIF link\n- More diverse topics covered\n\nComparing the two:\n\nSimilarities:\n- Both use very informal language\n- Both have short, fragmented messages\n- Both use some crude/inappropriate language\n- Both seem to be from casual conversation contexts\n\nDifferences:\n- Set 1 has much worse spelling/typing (\"whay\", \"wjat\")\n- Set 1 repeats \"cat\" multiple times, showing a different communication pattern\n- Set 2 shows more varied vocabulary and topics\n- Set 2 has better overall grammar and sentence structure\n- The tone feels different - Set 1 seems more frustrated/repetitive, Set 2 seems more conversational and varied\n- Set 2 includes things like GIF sharing which suggests different communication habits\n\nThe writing styles seem quite different. Set 1 appears to be from someone who types very quickly and carelessly with lots of typos, while Set 2 shows someone who communicates more clearly despite also being informal. The repetitive \"cat\" messages in Set 1 and the varied topics in Set 2 suggest different communication patterns.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nhttps://youtu.be/C1dBuSnkPIY?si=gsUrwdJdeuFMl8uu\n<sep>\nI see drake's favorite key listed up there\n<sep>\nBounced balls on his head.\n<sep>\nI should practice guitar.\n<sep>\n-# i don't drink\n<sep>\nYes.\n<sep>\nhttps://youtu.be/JV3FgaJD-wM?si=JLy8iwMJQ5j6N6CF\n<sep>\nMusic over here.\n<sep>\nI can feel it.\n<sep>\nThe BEAN\n\nSet 2:\nNot me\n<sep>\nI don't see myself in there\n<sep>\nIU more like I owe you\n<sep>\n<:catAbduction:1350101124253749328>\n<sep>\n513 N 3rd St Apt 20\n<sep>\nSince you keep bringing that up every time whenever i talk to you it means it was you\n<sep>\nI never did\n<sep>\nHeck is the male version of a bimbo\n<sep>\nIt could be very well you\n<sep>\nI didn't"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship patterns:\n\nSet 1:\n- Multiple YouTube links shared\n- Short, often fragmentary sentences\n- Music-related content (\"drake's favorite key\", \"I should practice guitar\", \"Music over here\")\n- Very brief responses (\"Yes.\", \"I can feel it.\")\n- Uses \"-#\" formatting\n- Mentions \"The BEAN\"\n- Generally very concise, sometimes cryptic messages\n\nSet 2:\n- No links shared\n- More conversational/argumentative tone\n- Longer sentences and more complete thoughts\n- Defensive language (\"Not me\", \"I don't see myself in there\", \"I never did\", \"I didn't\")\n- Seems to be responding to accusations or confrontation\n- Uses Discord emoji notation \"<:catAbduction:1350101124253749328>\"\n- Includes what appears to be an address\n- More back-and-forth conversational style\n- Makes observations about others (\"Heck is the male version of a bimbo\")\n\nThe writing styles seem quite different:\n\nSet 1: Very terse, fragmented, music-focused, shares links, cryptic/stream-of-consciousness style\nSet 2: More defensive, conversational, argumentative, longer thoughts, no links, seems to be in a dispute\n\nThe tone is completely different - Set 1 seems casual and music-focused, while Set 2 seems defensive and confrontational. The sentence structure and length are also very different. Set 1 has very short, often incomplete thoughts, while Set 2 has more complete sentences and sustained arguments.\n\nThese appear to be from different authors.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nEEEEE EEYSYYAYAYAYAYAYA\n<sep>\ndo u want my ig\n<sep>\ni made them pink\n<sep>\nnot really\n<sep>\ni clocked her shit\n<sep>\nit’s 2am i’m on reels giggling at dumb shit i feel like a fucking giraffe rn\n<sep>\nupvote\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/pet-dog-gif-1353073961338598642\n<sep>\ni’m the goat through and through of course throat is involved\n<sep>\ntook u 3 tries but i’m proud of you\n\nSet 2:\ndamn\n<sep>\ndamn\n<sep>\ni have stage fright\n<sep>\ni dont even think i was being mean\n<sep>\nevery baddie in here has a kid\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/lesbian-yuri-kiss-anime-gif-23631557\n<sep>\nwhen i get a call at 10pm from my boss i assume the worst\n<sep>\nily i’m just feeling bitchy today 💔\n<sep>\nok perf\n<sep>\nrav i pissed someone off and she left r u mad at me"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages to determine if they're from the same author or different authors.\n\nSet 1 characteristics:\n- Mix of casual internet slang and expressive language\n- Uses \"u\" instead of \"you\" \n- Includes random exclamatory text like \"EEEEE EEYSYYAYAYAYAYAYA\"\n- Very casual/informal tone\n- Uses phrases like \"i clocked her shit\", \"i'm the goat\", \"took u 3 tries but i'm proud of you\"\n- Shares GIFs/links\n- Uses lowercase consistently\n- Has a playful, somewhat chaotic energy\n- Makes sexual innuendos (\"throat is involved\")\n- Self-deprecating humor (\"i feel like a fucking giraffe\")\n\nSet 2 characteristics:\n- Also very casual and informal\n- Uses \"u\" instead of \"you\"\n- Lowercase writing style\n- Shares GIFs/links (anime/lesbian content)\n- Expresses vulnerability and social anxiety (\"i have stage fright\", \"rav i pissed someone off\")\n- Uses affectionate language (\"ily\")\n- Apologetic/self-aware tone in some messages\n- Uses abbreviations like \"perf\" for \"perfect\"\n- Shows concern about social interactions and relationships\n\nComparing the two sets:\n\nSimilarities:\n- Both use very casual, informal writing style\n- Both consistently use lowercase\n- Both use \"u\" instead of \"you\"\n- Both share GIFs/links\n- Both have a young, internet-native voice\n- Both show emotional vulnerability in different ways\n- Both use casual slang and abbreviations\n\nDifferences:\n- Set 1 has more chaotic/random energy and sexual content\n- Set 2 shows more social anxiety and relationship concerns\n- Set 1 has more confident/boastful moments (\"i'm the goat\")\n- Set 2 is more apologetic and uncertain about social dynamics\n- The specific slang and references are different\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nEEEEE EEYSYYAYAYAYAYAYA\n<sep>\ndo u want my ig\n<sep>\ni made them pink\n<sep>\nnot really\n<sep>\ni clocked her shit\n<sep>\nit’s 2am i’m on reels giggling at dumb shit i feel like a fucking giraffe rn\n<sep>\nupvote\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/pet-dog-gif-1353073961338598642\n<sep>\ni’m the goat through and through of course throat is involved\n<sep>\ntook u 3 tries but i’m proud of you\n\nSet 2:\nHe needs some crack\n<sep>\nThis would trip me out if I was on acid\n<sep>\nGet faded!\n<sep>\nOh no I’m still working, finish in a bout an hour and a half\n<sep>\nMorning degenerates\n<sep>\nThat’s crazy lmfao\n<sep>\nI need to stop masturbating before bedtime\n<sep>\nThe only way is Essex\n<sep>\nOr maybe some milk\n<sep>\nThe smell of grilled chicken mmmm"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing style, tone, and characteristics of both sets of messages.\n\nSet 1:\n- Uses a lot of informal, playful language \n- Very internet/social media oriented slang (\"ig\", \"reels\", \"upvote\")\n- Lowercase writing style throughout\n- Sexual innuendo (\"throat is involved\", \"i'm the goat\")\n- Playful/joking tone\n- Uses phrases like \"i clocked her shit\" which is Gen Z slang\n- Very casual, stream-of-consciousness style\n- Uses emoji-like expressions (\"EEEEE EEYSYYAYAYAYAYAYA\")\n- References social media platforms (Instagram, reels)\n- Somewhat chaotic, energetic tone\n\nSet 2:\n- More complete sentences with proper capitalization\n- Uses some slang but different type (\"faded\", \"degenerates\")\n- More crude/direct humor (\"I need to stop masturbating before bedtime\")\n- References drugs casually (\"crack\", \"acid\")\n- Different cultural references (\"The only way is Essex\" - British reference)\n- More conventional sentence structure\n- Different energy - less manic, more straightforward crude humor\n- Uses \"lmfao\" instead of other expressions\n- References work (\"I'm still working\")\n\nThe writing styles seem quite different:\n\n1. Capitalization patterns: Set 1 is almost entirely lowercase, Set 2 uses proper capitalization\n2. Slang usage: Different generational/cultural slang\n3. Tone: Set 1 is more manic/energetic, Set 2 is more straightforward crude humor\n4. Cultural references: Set 1 is very American Gen Z social media, Set 2 has British references\n5. Sentence structure: Set 1 is more fragmented/stream of consciousness, Set 2 is more complete sentences\n6. Energy level: Set 1 feels more hyperactive, Set 2 feels more laid back\n\nThese seem like different authors to me.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nMake them fingerless so u look cool\n<sep>\nIts a true story\n<sep>\n456\n<sep>\nI got one that says dead\n<sep>\n<:cryIgnore:417770924612386826>\n<sep>\nU show up\n<sep>\nIdk\n<sep>\nEgo\n<sep>\nHeh\n<sep>\nMight as well put a mirror on the wall and talk to myself\n\nSet 2:\nOwo sleepy\n<sep>\nHmmm\n<sep>\nThey would teach me how to live for myself and love myself properly. And, I would abandon god and do as they say.\n<sep>\nWasn't my style\n<sep>\nThis conspiracy is more common that one might think\n<sep>\nSynchronicity\n<sep>\nWouldn't u like to know\n<sep>\nWut?\n<sep>\nHehehe\n<sep>\nU know im autism, right?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze both sets of messages for writing style, tone, punctuation, and content patterns.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"Make them fingerless so u look cool\" - uses \"u\" instead of \"you\"\n- \"Its a true story\" - missing apostrophe in \"Its\" \n- \"456\" - just a number\n- \"I got one that says dead\" - casual tone\n- \"<:cryIgnore:417770924612386826>\" - emoji/emoticon usage\n- \"U show up\" - again uses \"u\"\n- \"Idk\" - internet slang abbreviation\n- \"Ego\" - single word\n- \"Heh\" - simple laugh expression\n- \"Might as well put a mirror on the wall and talk to myself\" - longer, more complete sentence\n\nSet 2:\n- \"Owo sleepy\" - uses \"Owo\" internet expression\n- \"Hmmm\" - similar to \"Heh\" but different\n- \"They would teach me how to live for myself and love myself properly. And, I would abandon god and do as they say.\" - much more complex, philosophical sentence structure\n- \"Wasn't my style\" - casual, contracted\n- \"This conspiracy is more common that one might think\" - should be \"than\" not \"that\" - grammar error\n- \"Synchronicity\" - single word, more sophisticated vocabulary\n- \"Wouldn't u like to know\" - uses \"u\" again\n- \"Wut?\" - internet slang spelling of \"what\"\n- \"Hehehe\" - similar to \"Heh\" but extended\n- \"U know im autism, right?\" - uses \"u\" and \"im\" abbreviations, missing apostrophe in \"im\"\n\nSimilarities:\n- Both use \"u\" instead of \"you\" multiple times\n- Both use casual internet slang and abbreviations\n- Both have some grammar/punctuation issues (missing apostrophes)\n- Both use \"Heh\"/\"Hehehe\" type laugh expressions\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nMake them fingerless so u look cool\n<sep>\nIts a true story\n<sep>\n456\n<sep>\nI got one that says dead\n<sep>\n<:cryIgnore:417770924612386826>\n<sep>\nU show up\n<sep>\nIdk\n<sep>\nEgo\n<sep>\nHeh\n<sep>\nMight as well put a mirror on the wall and talk to myself\n\nSet 2:\nYes bring the light of jeaus to the dark crevices of discord\n<sep>\nI like a stacked woman who talks shit but I.put her in her place in the bedroom\n<sep>\nTbh I was too lazy to read the article\n<sep>\n<uid>\n<sep>\n<uid> can tell ur mum loves a bad boy with tattoos\n<sep>\nA lot of us treated Andy like shit cus he was being a shitty retarded creep but yeah ppl can still have compassion, never forget the doo gon song, and he was funny in his retarded way,\n<sep>\n<uid> yeah I'm a lad from essex\n<sep>\n<uid> ppl were trying to dazzle with chat gpt but it actually inspired it\n<sep>\nTbh some ppl did treat Andy like shit and probably using recent events for care clout, 2 faced ppl all over discord <uid>\n<sep>\nNah ur a leopard skin print girl"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing styles of these two sets to see if they appear to be written by the same author.\n\nSet 1:\n- Very short, casual messages\n- Simple language\n- Lower case \"u\" for \"you\"\n- Uses emoticons like \"<:cryIgnore:417770924612386826>\"\n- Simple statements like \"Its a true story\", \"456\", \"I got one that says dead\"\n- More introspective/contemplative tone in the last message about putting a mirror on the wall\n- Grammar is casual but not particularly crude\n\nSet 2:\n- Much longer, more elaborate messages\n- More vulgar/crude language (\"talks shit\", \"retarded\", sexual content)\n- Uses \"ur\" for \"your\" and \"u\" for \"you\" sometimes, but also uses full words\n- More complex sentence structures\n- References to specific people and situations (Andy, discord drama)\n- Much more confrontational and crude tone\n- Uses \"tbh\" (to be honest)\n- British slang (\"lad from essex\")\n- More aggressive/sexual content\n\nKey differences:\n1. Message length - Set 1 has very short messages, Set 2 has much longer ones\n2. Tone - Set 1 is more subdued/casual, Set 2 is crude and aggressive\n3. Vocabulary - Set 2 uses much more vulgar language and sexual references\n4. Complexity - Set 2 shows more complex thoughts and references to ongoing situations\n5. Cultural references - Set 2 has British references that Set 1 lacks\n\nWhile both use some text speak abbreviations, the overall style, tone, vocabulary, and complexity are quite different. Set 1 seems more like a younger or more reserved person making simple comments, while Set 2 seems like someone who is more crude, aggressive, and involved in drama/conflicts.\n\nThe writing styles are sufficiently different that I believe these are from different authors.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nCalling in the expert\n<sep>\nDang not available in The Netherlands\n<sep>\nI talked to her\nShe’s back\nDon’t let it happen again\n<sep>\nWhy not\n<sep>\nAs if that’s a bad thing lol\nAs if your household can function without electricity lmaoooooo\n<sep>\nI figure the parents wouldn’t give the dried stuff to the babies anyway, but idk\n<sep>\nAlmost time to go home token\nThink about nitro\n<sep>\n<:pequoi:1276306665443954731>\n<sep>\nWhat about not feeding the birds in summer\n<sep>\n<:haha:948926676191043645>\n\nSet 2:\nMr complainer\n<sep>\n<a:znether:1341706770833477652>\n<sep>\nMirin uniformity\nYou got the same background on your phone too?\n<sep>\n🪱\n<sep>\nCalling in the expert\n<sep>\nAdvantages of sleeping with the window open?\n<sep>\n((10*2)+6)*8/4\n<sep>\nNice try cia\n<sep>\n1818\n<sep>\nIdk I lied to act tough but I’m actually a virgin"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze both sets of messages to look for patterns in writing style, tone, punctuation, and content.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"Calling in the expert\" - casual phrase\n- \"Dang not available in The Netherlands\" - casual tone, no punctuation at end\n- \"I talked to her / She's back / Don't let it happen again\" - short, direct statements\n- \"Why not\" - simple question, no punctuation\n- \"As if that's a bad thing lol / As if your household can function without electricity lmaoooooo\" - uses \"lol\" and \"lmaoooooo\", casual internet language\n- \"I figure the parents wouldn't give the dried stuff to the babies anyway, but idk\" - uses \"idk\" abbreviation\n- \"Almost time to go home token / Think about nitro\" - short phrases\n- Uses Discord emotes: \"<:pequoi:1276306665443954731>\" and \"<:haha:948926676191043645>\"\n- \"What about not feeding the birds in summer\" - casual question\n\nSet 2:\n- \"Mr complainer\" - casual, short phrase\n- Uses Discord emote: \"<a:znether:1341706770833477652>\"\n- \"Mirin uniformity / You got the same background on your phone too?\" - casual tone, question\n- Uses emoji: \"🪱\"\n- \"Calling in the expert\" - exact same phrase as in Set 1\n- \"Advantages of sleeping with the window open?\" - question format\n- \"((10*2)+6)*8/4\" - mathematical expression\n- \"Nice try cia\" - casual, no punctuation, lowercase \"cia\"\n- \"1818\" - just numbers\n- \"Idk I lied to act tough but I'm actually a virgin\" - uses \"Idk\" (same abbreviation pattern as Set 1), casual confession style\n\nKey similarities:\n1. Both use \"Calling in the expert\" - exact same phrase\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nCalling in the expert\n<sep>\nDang not available in The Netherlands\n<sep>\nI talked to her\nShe’s back\nDon’t let it happen again\n<sep>\nWhy not\n<sep>\nAs if that’s a bad thing lol\nAs if your household can function without electricity lmaoooooo\n<sep>\nI figure the parents wouldn’t give the dried stuff to the babies anyway, but idk\n<sep>\nAlmost time to go home token\nThink about nitro\n<sep>\n<:pequoi:1276306665443954731>\n<sep>\nWhat about not feeding the birds in summer\n<sep>\n<:haha:948926676191043645>\n\nSet 2:\nandy, who checked in to rehab 3 weeks ago, is suddenly dead\nit was posted on his server\nand its verified by **facebook**\nwith people that somehow have his brothers facebook\nbecause his brother is a **well known member of this community, isn't he?**\n<sep>\nand the mash takes on the dripping of the burger\n<sep>\nalso valid and fair\n<sep>\nhe keeps himself very f-- 50!?!?!\n<sep>\ni live a legitimate life, though, i will say that\n<sep>\nbut hey, at least he's better off - regardless\n<sep>\nmy job is literally logical thinking, im a systems and emebedded software engineer\n<sep>\napologies, head elsewhere! i meant ... what have ya done?\n<sep>\nproud Yorkshireman\n<sep>\nif its in industries best interests to have a planned obsolescence, then of course, this will happen"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing style, tone, and characteristics of both sets of messages.\n\nSet 1:\n- Very short, casual messages\n- Frequent use of \"lol\", \"lmaoooooo\" - informal internet slang\n- Simple sentence structure\n- Use of Discord emojis (pequoi, haha)\n- Topics are casual/everyday (Netherlands availability, talking to someone, electricity, feeding birds)\n- Generally lighthearted tone\n- Minimal punctuation, lowercase style\n\nSet 2:\n- Much longer, more complex sentences\n- More formal/serious tone in many messages\n- Discusses serious topics (death, rehab, legitimate life, engineering job)\n- Uses bold formatting (**facebook**, **well known member of this community, isn't he?**)\n- More sophisticated vocabulary and sentence structure\n- Professional context mentioned (systems and embedded software engineer)\n- Uses more proper punctuation and capitalization\n- More analytical/logical thinking style\n- British reference (\"proud Yorkshireman\")\n\nThe writing styles are quite different:\n\n1. Length and complexity: Set 1 has very short, simple messages while Set 2 has longer, more complex thoughts\n2. Tone: Set 1 is casual and playful, Set 2 is more serious and analytical\n3. Language use: Set 1 uses internet slang heavily, Set 2 uses more formal language\n4. Topics: Set 1 discusses everyday casual things, Set 2 discusses more serious/professional topics\n5. Formatting: Set 2 uses bold formatting which Set 1 doesn't\n6. Punctuation: Set 1 minimal punctuation, Set 2 more proper punctuation\n\nThese seem like very different writing styles and personalities. The casual, short, slang-heavy style of Set 1 contrasts sharply with the more analytical, formal, longer-form style of Set 2.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nI can’t sleep so have some tiddy \n\nAlso nice dicks <:06emojismirk:1355132770577285244>\n<sep>\nOmg the cutest nips\n<sep>\nYeah ew no homo obviously\n<sep>\n<:06emojismirk:1355132770577285244>\n<sep>\nooooo, does it work with the canned one as well?\n<sep>\nI have some on my boobs <:blushbitch:1165389655659782234> and arm fat lol\n<sep>\n<:hotsuccubus:1231560674384019476>\n<sep>\n<:06emojismirk:1355132770577285244>\n<sep>\n||Me doing it at night when I’m tired and just wanna sleep but I’m a good girl ||\n<sep>\nI can’t sleep so have some tiddy \n\nAlso nice dicks <:06emojismirk:1355132770577285244>\n\nSet 2:\nThat’s actually hilarious that people joined with that name\n<sep>\nHAHAHA\n<sep>\nHAHAHA\n<sep>\n<:06emojismirk:1355132770577285244>\n<sep>\nI miss him but I understand that he freaked out and if he acts like that he shouldn’t be here or on discord tbh\n<sep>\nAnother person posting the grubby grippers for free\n<sep>\nIdk I just saw pushy cunt and laughed\n<sep>\n<:06emojismirk:1355132770577285244>\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/dancing-cat-dance-cat-cat-meme-chinese-cat-gif-1274766959165009975\n<sep>\nOh yeah that’s me with my gross dick fingers"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nI need to analyze these two sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author or different authors. Let me look at various aspects:\n\n**Tone and Content:**\nSet 1: Contains very sexual/explicit content with references to \"tiddy\", \"nice dicks\", \"nips\", \"boobs\", mentions being a \"good girl\", etc. The tone is quite sexual and provocative.\n\nSet 2: More casual conversation, some humor (\"That's actually hilarious\", \"HAHAHA\"), mentions someone who \"freaked out\", casual observations about usernames, mentions \"grubby grippers\" and \"gross dick fingers\" - still has some crude humor but less overtly sexual.\n\n**Writing Style:**\nSet 1: Very short, fragmented messages. Uses a lot of emojis/emoticons. Some messages are just single emojis. Uses spoiler tags (||text||).\n\nSet 2: Also short messages but slightly more conversational. Still uses emojis. Has some longer thoughts that are more coherent sentences.\n\n**Punctuation and Grammar:**\nSet 1: Minimal punctuation, very casual, some messages are just fragments or single words/emojis.\n\nSet 2: Similar casual style, but slightly more complete sentences in some cases.\n\n**Specific Patterns:**\nBoth sets use the same emoji: <:06emojismirk:1355132770577285244> - this appears multiple times in both sets, which is quite specific.\n\nBoth have a crude/sexual sense of humor, though Set 1 is much more explicitly sexual.\n\nBoth use very casual, informal language.\n\nBoth seem to be from some kind of chat or Discord conversation based on the formatting and emoji codes.\n\n**Key Similarities:**\n- Same specific emoji used multiple times\n- Similar casual, crude humor style\n- Very informal writing\n- Short message format\n- Both seem to be from the same platform (Discord based on emoji formatting)\n\n**Key Differences:**\n- Set 1 is much more explicitly sexual\n- Set 2 has more coherent conversational flow\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nI can’t sleep so have some tiddy \n\nAlso nice dicks <:06emojismirk:1355132770577285244>\n<sep>\nOmg the cutest nips\n<sep>\nYeah ew no homo obviously\n<sep>\n<:06emojismirk:1355132770577285244>\n<sep>\nooooo, does it work with the canned one as well?\n<sep>\nI have some on my boobs <:blushbitch:1165389655659782234> and arm fat lol\n<sep>\n<:hotsuccubus:1231560674384019476>\n<sep>\n<:06emojismirk:1355132770577285244>\n<sep>\n||Me doing it at night when I’m tired and just wanna sleep but I’m a good girl ||\n<sep>\nI can’t sleep so have some tiddy \n\nAlso nice dicks <:06emojismirk:1355132770577285244>\n\nSet 2:\nGuys are fucking weird.\n<sep>\nYeah they seriously got a stick up theirs.\n<sep>\nThe shit we can convince ourselves of.\n<sep>\nTbh.\n<sep>\nPrecisely.\n<sep>\nIdk what you want to hear lol.\n<sep>\nHelp them how?\n<sep>\nHUR HUR HUR.\n<sep>\nI wish there was a place I could go mosh.\n<sep>\nShe didn’t like it because it made her see/feel things."
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages to determine if they're from the same author or different authors.\n\nSet 1 Analysis:\n- Contains sexually explicit content and references to body parts\n- Uses custom Discord emojis frequently (like :06emojismirk:, :blushbitch:, :hotsuccubus:)\n- Very casual, informal tone\n- Contains spoiler tags (||text||)\n- Seems to be in a more adult/NSFW context\n- Writing style is very brief, casual\n- Uses \"lol\" \n- Has playful/flirty tone\n- One message is repeated exactly\n\nSet 2 Analysis:\n- Much more conversational and general topics\n- Talks about \"guys\" in a critical way\n- No sexual content at all\n- No custom emojis used\n- More coherent conversational flow\n- Uses \"Tbh\" (to be honest)\n- Uses \"Idk\" (I don't know) \n- Uses \"lol\" as well\n- Tone is more casual conversation, possibly complaining/venting\n- \"HUR HUR HUR\" suggests mockery or sarcasm\n- References to moshing (music scene)\n- References someone not liking something because \"it made her see/feel things\"\n\nComparison:\n- Both use informal internet language (\"lol\", abbreviations)\n- Both are very casual in tone\n- However, the content is drastically different - Set 1 is sexually explicit while Set 2 is general conversation\n- Set 1 heavily uses custom Discord emojis, Set 2 uses none\n- The context and subject matter are completely different\n- Set 1 seems to be in an adult/NSFW Discord server, Set 2 seems like general chat\n- The writing patterns and interests expressed are quite different\n\nWhile both authors use casual internet language, the stark difference in content type, emoji usage, and overall context suggests these are likely different people. The first person seems focused on sexual content and uses lots of custom emojis, while the second person is having more general conversations without any sexual content or custom emojis.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nshe’s 38\n<sep>\njust staring at it\n<sep>\nno way\n<sep>\nlove to see it\n<sep>\nalright\n<sep>\nfrom your world\n<sep>\nthis is very aldi coded\n<sep>\nguess happy\n<sep>\nwhat was the idea behind the name ‘bunny’\n<sep>\ndo it\n\nSet 2:\n<:Chillguy:1317290906520522813>\n<sep>\nI don't know what I have but it is what I make of it, everyday.\n<sep>\nLike a lemonade stand.\n<sep>\nBut I'm not believing it until I see actually real evidence not just over what some Discordian says\n<sep>\nHaha.\n<sep>\nMore discussions please!\n<sep>\n1. Why are Discordians suddenly dying?\n\n2. In these servers you don't know what to believe because it has a continuous pattern of LIES and misinformation \n\n3. It always sounds sketchy when someone on here says someone died\n\n4. How did you get their FB or find it\n\n5. I'm about sick of it tbh\n\n6. No one cares until you died.\n\n7. People made fun of Andy a lot, power abused him, I didn't like it but he was one of the sweetest guys ever, when I spoke with him in vc, he was always nice.\n<sep>\nI liked Andy smh.\n<sep>\n\"I'd rather be 80 year old me than 20 year old you\".\n<sep>\n....Fascinating."
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, and other linguistic features of these two sets of messages.\n\nSet 1 Analysis:\n- Very short, casual messages\n- Lowercase writing style throughout\n- Simple, everyday language\n- Messages are quite brief and conversational\n- No complex punctuation\n- Informal tone\n- Messages like \"she's 38\", \"no way\", \"alright\", \"do it\" are very brief and casual\n- \"this is very aldi coded\" uses internet slang/coding language\n- Generally very casual, brief responses\n\nSet 2 Analysis:\n- Much longer, more complex messages\n- Proper capitalization and punctuation\n- More formal/structured writing\n- Uses numbered lists (1. 2. 3. etc.)\n- More philosophical/reflective tone\n- Contains longer sentences and more complex thoughts\n- Uses quotation marks properly\n- More elaborate expressions like \"But I'm not believing it until I see actually real evidence\"\n- Discusses serious topics like death, misinformation\n- Contains emotional expressions but in a more structured way\n- Uses abbreviations like \"smh\", \"tbh\", \"vc\" but in context of longer, more structured messages\n\nKey Differences:\n1. Length: Set 1 has very short messages, Set 2 has much longer ones\n2. Capitalization: Set 1 is mostly lowercase, Set 2 uses proper capitalization\n3. Complexity: Set 1 is simple/casual, Set 2 is more complex and structured\n4. Tone: Set 1 is casual/brief, Set 2 is more serious and reflective\n5. Punctuation: Set 1 has minimal punctuation, Set 2 uses proper punctuation including numbered lists\n6. Content depth: Set 1 has surface-level casual remarks, Set 2 discusses deeper topics with more analysis\n\nThese seem like very different writing styles and authors. The first set appears to be someone who writes very casually and briefly, while the second set appears to be someone who writes more formally and at length, even when discussing casual topics.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nmombies profile pic has me confuzzled\n<sep>\nmombies profile pic has me confuzzled\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/rileysgifs-michael-sheen-i-am-in-your-walls-michael-sheen-twilight-twilight-gif-10276388082299170346\n<sep>\n<:sideeye:1353949824289996931>\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/sad-walk-away-tiger-gif-13828540\n<sep>\ngood job\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/you-are-banned-banned-ban-ban-him-ban-hammer-gif-3899611162483726731\n<sep>\n<:cat_silly_bleh:1099406604249608192>\n<sep>\n<uid> <uid> \n\n145253872 my friend code\n<sep>\nI dont\n\nSet 2:\nHe fucked you off???\n<sep>\nMaam please stop Im already sold on the idea\n<sep>\nAnd pet it\n<sep>\nIm all about that 7%\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/cat-cats-pet-cat-cat-pet-cute-cat-gif-24810247\n<sep>\nYall please stop posting these incredibly hot nsfw pics in main ty\n<sep>\nYuuuss\n<sep>\n<:thinking:940505088462553108>\n<sep>\n<:cat_stab:1315699528782970920>\n<sep>\nHewwo"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze both sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author.\n\nSet 1:\n- Uses abbreviated/internet slang: \"mombies\" (likely \"zombies\"), \"confuzzled\" (confused + puzzled)\n- Shares GIFs/tenor links frequently\n- Uses custom Discord emojis: <:sideeye:1353949824289996931>, <:cat_silly_bleh:1099406604249608192>\n- Short, casual messages\n- Shares a friend code with numbers\n- Very brief responses like \"good job\", \"I dont\"\n- Playful/casual tone\n\nSet 2:\n- Uses similar casual/internet language: \"Maam\", \"Yall\", \"Yuuuss\", \"Hewwo\"\n- Also shares GIFs/tenor links\n- Uses custom Discord emojis: <:thinking:940505088462553108>, <:cat_stab:1315699528782970920>\n- Short, casual messages\n- Playful tone with expressions like \"Im all about that 7%\"\n- Uses similar abbreviations and casual grammar\n\nBoth sets show:\n1. Frequent use of GIFs/tenor links\n2. Custom Discord emojis (both cat-related and others)\n3. Very casual, abbreviated internet language\n4. Short message format\n5. Playful, informal tone\n6. Similar grammar patterns (dropping letters, casual contractions)\n7. Both use cat-related emojis\n8. Both have a similar irreverent, casual posting style\n\nThe writing style, tone, use of emojis, GIF sharing habits, and casual language patterns are very consistent between both sets. The author appears to be the same person posting in what looks like a Discord server or similar chat platform.\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nmombies profile pic has me confuzzled\n<sep>\nmombies profile pic has me confuzzled\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/rileysgifs-michael-sheen-i-am-in-your-walls-michael-sheen-twilight-twilight-gif-10276388082299170346\n<sep>\n<:sideeye:1353949824289996931>\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/sad-walk-away-tiger-gif-13828540\n<sep>\ngood job\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/you-are-banned-banned-ban-ban-him-ban-hammer-gif-3899611162483726731\n<sep>\n<:cat_silly_bleh:1099406604249608192>\n<sep>\n<uid> <uid> \n\n145253872 my friend code\n<sep>\nI dont\n\nSet 2:\nThat drip looks delicious\n<sep>\nI knew I left those somewhere\n<sep>\nThat’s adorable\n<sep>\nSo hot! I love the body hair\n<sep>\n<role> anyone wanna hang out while I’m in the bath?\n<sep>\nI was kidding because it autocorrected to orthodontist which is a type of dentist not optometrist\n<sep>\nThat’s my worst nightmare!\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/parraque-infarto-fainted-gif-11968695137576080389\n<sep>\nThank you 🥰\n<sep>\nSo you get to deal with crazy people. I made friends with my last ones they told me insane stories"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the tone, writing style, punctuation, and content of these two sets of messages.\n\nSet 1:\n- Uses terms like \"confuzzled\" - informal, playful language\n- Shares GIFs/memes frequently\n- Uses Discord emojis like <:sideeye:1353949824289996931> and <:cat_silly_bleh:1099406604249608192>\n- Very brief, casual messages\n- Gaming reference with friend code\n- Messages are quite short and often standalone thoughts\n- Uses \"mombies\" which seems like internet slang\n- Simple phrases like \"good job\", \"I dont\"\n\nSet 2:\n- More complete sentences and thoughts\n- Uses phrases like \"That's adorable\", \"That's my worst nightmare!\" - more conventional expressions\n- Still shares GIFs but less frequently relative to text\n- Has longer, more conversational messages\n- Uses proper punctuation more consistently\n- Messages seem more cohesive and part of ongoing conversations\n- Uses emojis but standard ones (🥰) rather than custom Discord ones\n- Language is more mature/standard - \"delicious\", \"adorable\", etc.\n- Has more context-dependent messages that seem part of longer conversations\n\nThe writing styles seem quite different:\n- Set 1 is more fragmented, uses more internet slang, heavy on custom emojis/memes\n- Set 2 has more complete thoughts, standard language, longer conversational messages\n\nThe tone is different too:\n- Set 1 feels more scattered, meme-heavy, gaming-oriented\n- Set 2 feels more conversational, mature, relationship-focused\n\nThe punctuation and grammar patterns are also different:\n- Set 1 has very minimal punctuation, often incomplete thoughts\n- Set 2 uses more standard punctuation and complete sentences\n\nThese seem like different authors to me.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nI think it's Hephaestus temple\n<sep>\nWith a storm over it and all the bad things etc..\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/im-free-better-leaving-work-like-gif-18769507\n<sep>\nMust be\n<sep>\nOla 😂\n<sep>\n🤣\n<sep>\nHe does some elf king\n<sep>\nIt's a blockage\n<sep>\n🤪\n<sep>\nA trap..?\n\nSet 2:\nyo link please\n<sep>\nads duh\n<sep>\nit's the natural endgame\n<sep>\nI agree\n<sep>\ndead crowd\n<sep>\nnative audio in the generate speech section only has the 2.5 series (both pro and flash)\n<sep>\nthey're wary of distillation\n<sep>\ndead crowd\n<sep>\nbecause it does\n<sep>\n2.5ntiveaudio!!!!!!!"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"I think it's Hephaestus temple\"\n- \"With a storm over it and all the bad things etc..\"\n- A GIF link about being free/leaving work\n- \"Must be\"\n- \"Ola 😂\"\n- \"🤣\"\n- \"He does some elf king\"\n- \"It's a blockage\"\n- \"🤪\"\n- \"A trap..?\"\n\nSet 2:\n- \"yo link please\"\n- \"ads duh\"\n- \"it's the natural endgame\"\n- \"I agree\"\n- \"dead crowd\"\n- \"native audio in the generate speech section only has the 2.5 series (both pro and flash)\"\n- \"they're wary of distillation\"\n- \"dead crowd\"\n- \"because it does\"\n- \"2.5ntiveaudio!!!!!!!\"\n\nLet me analyze various aspects:\n\n**Tone and Style:**\nSet 1: Very casual, playful, uses emojis frequently, shorter fragmented messages, seems to be engaged in some kind of creative or gaming discussion (mentions Hephaestus temple, elf king, trap). The tone is lighthearted and informal.\n\nSet 2: Also casual but more technical/discussion-oriented. Talks about technical features (native audio, generate speech section, 2.5 series, distillation). The tone is more direct and focused on a specific technical topic.\n\n**Punctuation and Grammar:**\nSet 1: Uses \"..\" frequently, casual punctuation, uses emojis as punctuation/expression\nSet 2: More standard punctuation, though still casual. Uses \"duh\" and \"yo\" which are informal but different style of informality\n\n**Message Length and Structure:**\nSet 1: Very short, fragmented messages. Most are 1-4 words. Lots of reaction-type messages.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nDamn you blocked him 😭\n<sep>\nTrue that\n<sep>\nBest heater\n<sep>\nLies\n<sep>\nThen\n<sep>\n😔\n<sep>\nI'm not most people\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/kick-yeet-gtfo-kick-cliff-push-cliff-gif-9944415665032080774\n<sep>\nCulture\n<sep>\n<uid>\n\nSet 2:\nhttps://tenor.com/view/beers-drinking-lets-get-drunk-party-time-shots-gif-17299737\n<sep>\nIf you join me 🙂↕️\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/elastigirl-mirror-gif-27141884\n<sep>\n😔\n<sep>\nHbu <uid>\n<sep>\n<uid>\n<sep>\n😭😭\n<sep>\nReal\n<sep>\nCute\n<sep>\nReal"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing style and characteristics of both sets of messages:\n\nSet 1:\n- Short, casual messages\n- Uses emojis like 😭, 😔\n- Uses \"Damn\" - informal language\n- \"True that\" - casual affirmation\n- Single word responses like \"Lies\", \"Then\", \"Culture\"\n- \"I'm not most people\" - complete sentence\n- Shares a tenor gif link\n- Contains \"<uid>\" which seems to be a placeholder\n\nSet 2:\n- Also short, casual messages\n- Uses emojis like 😔, 😭😭, 🙂↕️\n- \"If you join me 🙂↕️\" - casual invitation\n- \"Hbu\" - abbreviated \"how bout you\"\n- Single word responses like \"Real\", \"Cute\"\n- \"Real\" appears twice\n- Shares tenor gif links (multiple)\n- Also contains \"<uid>\" placeholders\n\nSimilarities:\n- Both use very casual, informal language\n- Both use short messages/single words frequently\n- Both use similar emojis (😔, 😭)\n- Both share tenor gif links\n- Both have \"<uid>\" which suggests same platform/context\n- Both use \"Real\" as a response\n- Similar tone - casual, informal, reaction-based messaging\n- Both seem to be in casual conversation contexts\n\nThe writing style is very similar - short, casual responses with emojis and gif sharing. The use of single word affirmations like \"Real\", \"True that\", \"Lies\", \"Cute\" suggests a similar conversational style. The emoji usage is consistent between both sets. The tenor gif sharing is present in both. The presence of \"<uid>\" in both suggests the same platform/conversation context.\n\nWhile the content is different, the style, tone, and approach to messaging seems very consistent between the two sets.\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nWhat is this guy talking about\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/boy-kisser-gif-15260736522907039947\n<sep>\nFuk u\n<sep>\nhttps://media.discordapp.net/attachments/1051632998832930847/1177703909700161606/watermark.gif\n<sep>\nHaiiii queen\n<sep>\nDo u?\n<sep>\nGlam isnt rage baiting\n<sep>\nOh ok\n<sep>\nBraappp\n<sep>\nYour like\n\nSet 2:\n???\n<sep>\nhttps://media.discordapp.net/attachments/1057118412033249311/1196489341556502659/digicube.gif\n<sep>\nLike 7\n<sep>\nThese all suck its just suicide\n<sep>\nWhat is this guy talking about\n<sep>\nCant hear u down there\n<sep>\nWhat is this guy talking about\n<sep>\nWow same\n<sep>\n5 furry femboys added\n<sep>\nHaiiii queen"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"What is this guy talking about\"\n- Links to GIFs/media\n- \"Fuk u\" \n- \"Haiiii queen\"\n- \"Do u?\"\n- \"Glam isnt rage baiting\"\n- \"Oh ok\"\n- \"Braappp\"\n- \"Your like\"\n\nSet 2:\n- \"???\"\n- Links to GIFs/media\n- \"Like 7\"\n- \"These all suck its just suicide\"\n- \"What is this guy talking about\"\n- \"Cant hear u down there\"\n- \"What is this guy talking about\"\n- \"Wow same\"\n- \"5 furry femboys added\"\n- \"Haiiii queen\"\n\nLet me look for patterns:\n\n1. Both sets contain the exact phrase \"What is this guy talking about\" - this appears once in Set 1 and twice in Set 2.\n\n2. Both sets contain \"Haiiii queen\" - this is a very distinctive greeting/phrase that appears in both sets.\n\n3. Both sets share links to Discord media attachments and GIFs, suggesting similar platform usage.\n\n4. The writing style is very casual, internet slang heavy, with short fragmented messages.\n\n5. Both use informal punctuation and grammar.\n\n6. The tone is casual, meme-heavy, and typical of Discord chat conversations.\n\n7. Both sets contain somewhat edgy/provocative content.\n\nThe key indicators that suggest same authorship:\n- The exact repetition of \"What is this guy talking about\" \n- The exact repetition of \"Haiiii queen\" with the same distinctive spelling\n- Similar casual, fragmented writing style\n- Similar use of internet slang and memes\n- Similar platform (Discord) usage patterns\n\nThese are quite distinctive phrases, especially \"Haiiii queen\" with that specific spelling. The repetition of the exact phrase \"What is this guy talking about\" is also a strong indicator.\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nIs this a snap filter?\n<sep>\nBless his heart\n<sep>\nWho are these people?\n<sep>\nNo it’s fake\n<sep>\nIt’s a man thing…\n<sep>\nThey are tamer tho\n<sep>\nYou ain’t sexy\n<sep>\nNice use of chat gpt\n<sep>\nBut that much?\n<sep>\nHis bro posted it on Facebook\n\nSet 2:\nYes sometimes! lol\n<sep>\nThe issue is ai in the eu isn’t allowed to pick up on emotion\n<sep>\nWas seasonal variation discorder at some point\n<sep>\nYes that Andy 😦\n<sep>\nThis you?\n<sep>\nIt gets them so turned on tho\n<sep>\nNah don’t\n<sep>\nHe had this before vaccines\n<sep>\nHello Sir\n<sep>\nIt turns me off a bit"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the two sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author or different authors.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"Is this a snap filter?\"\n- \"Bless his heart\"\n- \"Who are these people?\"\n- \"No it's fake\"\n- \"It's a man thing…\"\n- \"They are tamer tho\"\n- \"You ain't sexy\"\n- \"Nice use of chat gpt\"\n- \"But that much?\"\n- \"His bro posted it on Facebook\"\n\nSet 2:\n- \"Yes sometimes! lol\"\n- \"The issue is ai in the eu isn't allowed to pick up on emotion\"\n- \"Was seasonal variation discorder at some point\"\n- \"Yes that Andy 😦\"\n- \"This you?\"\n- \"It gets them so turned on tho\"\n- \"Nah don't\"\n- \"He had this before vaccines\"\n- \"Hello Sir\"\n- \"It turns me off a bit\"\n\nLet me look at the writing style and tone:\n\nSet 1:\n- Generally shorter, more casual messages\n- Uses informal language like \"Bless his heart\", \"You ain't sexy\"\n- Uses abbreviations like \"tho\" (though)\n- Casual, conversational tone\n- Some messages are fragments or questions\n- Uses lowercase \"chat gpt\"\n\nSet 2:\n- Also uses informal language and abbreviations like \"tho\", \"lol\"\n- Uses emoji (😦)\n- Mix of longer and shorter messages\n- More complete sentences in some cases\n- References technical topics (AI in EU, seasonal variation disorder)\n- Also very conversational\n\nCommon elements:\n- Both use \"tho\" instead of \"though\"\n- Both have very casual, conversational tone\n- Both use informal language\n- Both have short, fragment-like messages mixed with complete sentences\n- Both seem to be participating in casual conversations/chats\n\nDifferences:\n- Set 2 has some more technical/specific references (AI in EU, seasonal variation disorder)\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nIs this a snap filter?\n<sep>\nBless his heart\n<sep>\nWho are these people?\n<sep>\nNo it’s fake\n<sep>\nIt’s a man thing…\n<sep>\nThey are tamer tho\n<sep>\nYou ain’t sexy\n<sep>\nNice use of chat gpt\n<sep>\nBut that much?\n<sep>\nHis bro posted it on Facebook\n\nSet 2:\nthat's coy\n<sep>\nthe only bad about him is he left idk cheated on his pregnant wife\n<sep>\nwhy\n<sep>\nbedrot, daydream, unemployed\n<sep>\n💔💔💔💔\n<sep>\nI doubt you'd ever have a partner let alone a child\n<sep>\neven better\n<sep>\nthat's coy\n<sep>\nBruh 💔💔💔😭\n<sep>\nSigh"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution by looking at tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, and other linguistic features.\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- \"Is this a snap filter?\" - Direct question, standard capitalization\n- \"Bless his heart\" - Southern expression, shows cultural background\n- \"Who are these people?\" - Direct question\n- \"No it's fake\" - Short, informal, lowercase \"it's\"\n- \"It's a man thing…\" - Uses ellipsis, proper capitalization at start\n- \"They are tamer tho\" - Uses \"tho\" instead of \"though\", informal\n- \"You ain't sexy\" - Uses \"ain't\", very informal/colloquial\n- \"Nice use of chat gpt\" - Lowercase \"chat gpt\", sarcastic tone\n- \"But that much?\" - Fragment, questioning\n- \"His bro posted it on Facebook\" - Informal \"bro\", proper noun capitalization\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- \"that's coy\" - Lowercase start, informal\n- \"the only bad about him is he left idk cheated on his pregnant wife\" - Run-on sentence, lowercase start, \"idk\" abbreviation\n- \"why\" - Single word, lowercase\n- \"bedrot, daydream, unemployed\" - List format, lowercase, modern slang \"bedrot\"\n- \"💔💔💔💔\" - Multiple broken heart emojis\n- \"I doubt you'd ever have a partner let alone a child\" - More formal structure but harsh content\n- \"even better\" - Lowercase, brief\n- \"that's coy\" - Repeat of earlier message\n- \"Bruh 💔💔💔😭\" - \"Bruh\" slang, emojis, mix of heartbreak and crying\n- \"Sigh\" - Single word expression\n\nComparing the sets:\n\nSimilarities:\n- Both use informal language\n- Both have short, conversational messages\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nwhat basic feature is on the ultra sub?\n<sep>\nppl can be dramatic and emotional lol\n<sep>\nyessirrr\n\nGemini Diffusion Waitlist Your response has been recorded and you will be notified for any access updates . If you wish to remove your data from our database you can edit your submitted answer and remove any personal information that you may have entered . Edit your response This form was created inside of Google.com . Does this form look suspicious ? Report\n<sep>\nPRO 2.5 COULD NOT solve it\n<sep>\nPRO 2.5 COULD NOT solve it\n<sep>\njesus, no COT modfication either\n<sep>\nai pro is the $20 one no?\n<sep>\ngoogle beam is actually cool 😭\n<sep>\nIN THE US goddamnit\n<sep>\nyep not summarized yet\n\nStimulus Draft : \" Erratic seismic readings from Sector 7 - Gamma indicate anomalous shifts in the subsurface strata near the abandoned ' Deep Maw ' bore hole , causing minor tremors that are resonating faintly through the central processing plant . \" This is concrete : \" Erratic seismic readings , \" \" Sector 7 - Gamma , \" \" anomalous shifts in subsurface strata , \" \" Deep Maw bore hole , \" \" minor tremors , \" \" resonating faintly through the central processing plant . \" It hints at P1 ( understanding strata , mapping ) and P2 ( integrity of bore hole , plant structure ) . It doesn't scream \" Energy Reserve \" or \" Supply Lines . \" This fits the \" intersection \" idea .\n\nSet 2:\nmight be my specific prompt\n<sep>\nBROOO WHAT\n<sep>\nGEMINI DIFFUSION BRO\n<sep>\nthe way theyr releasing the dialogue version, its easy to see sound effects will come next\n<sep>\nits good at math AND creative writing\n<sep>\ncos theyr keeping it lowkey\n<sep>\ntheres too many ppl all of u go away\n<sep>\ncomputer use n stuff\n<sep>\nsneaking in the \"small group\" for text diffusion and the \"trusted tester\" for deep think\n<sep>\nit likes to think"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze both sets of messages for similarities and differences in writing style, tone, vocabulary, punctuation, and other markers.\n\nSet 1 Analysis:\n- Informal, casual tone throughout\n- Uses abbreviations: \"ppl\" for people, \"lol\", \"COT\" \n- Uses slang: \"yessirrr\", \"jesus\", \"goddamnit\"\n- Shows familiarity with AI/tech topics: mentions PRO 2.5, AI pro $20, google beam\n- Uses all caps for emphasis: \"PRO 2.5 COULD NOT\", \"IN THE US\"\n- Generally short, punchy messages\n- Shows some technical knowledge but expressed casually\n- Last message is much more formal and detailed, almost like a different voice - talks about \"Stimulus Draft\", \"subsurface strata\", etc. in a very technical way\n\nSet 2 Analysis:\n- Also informal, casual tone\n- Uses similar slang: \"BROOO WHAT\", \"BRO\"\n- Uses contractions: \"theyr\" instead of \"they're\", \"cos\" instead of \"because\", \"theres\" instead of \"there's\"\n- Shows interest in AI/tech: mentions Gemini diffusion, computer use, etc.\n- Uses all caps for emphasis: \"BROOO WHAT\", \"GEMINI DIFFUSION BRO\"\n- Short, punchy messages\n- Casual abbreviations and informal language\n- Shows knowledge of AI developments but expressed casually\n\nSimilarities:\n- Both use very informal, casual tone\n- Both use abbreviations and contractions\n- Both use all caps for emphasis\n- Both show interest in AI/tech topics\n- Both have short, punchy message style\n- Both use slang and casual expressions\n- Similar level of technical knowledge expressed informally\n\nKey differences:\n- Set 1 has that one very formal, technical message at the end that seems out of place\n- Set 2 uses more consistent informal contractions like \"theyr\", \"cos\", \"theres\"\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nwhat basic feature is on the ultra sub?\n<sep>\nppl can be dramatic and emotional lol\n<sep>\nyessirrr\n\nGemini Diffusion Waitlist Your response has been recorded and you will be notified for any access updates . If you wish to remove your data from our database you can edit your submitted answer and remove any personal information that you may have entered . Edit your response This form was created inside of Google.com . Does this form look suspicious ? Report\n<sep>\nPRO 2.5 COULD NOT solve it\n<sep>\nPRO 2.5 COULD NOT solve it\n<sep>\njesus, no COT modfication either\n<sep>\nai pro is the $20 one no?\n<sep>\ngoogle beam is actually cool 😭\n<sep>\nIN THE US goddamnit\n<sep>\nyep not summarized yet\n\nStimulus Draft : \" Erratic seismic readings from Sector 7 - Gamma indicate anomalous shifts in the subsurface strata near the abandoned ' Deep Maw ' bore hole , causing minor tremors that are resonating faintly through the central processing plant . \" This is concrete : \" Erratic seismic readings , \" \" Sector 7 - Gamma , \" \" anomalous shifts in subsurface strata , \" \" Deep Maw bore hole , \" \" minor tremors , \" \" resonating faintly through the central processing plant . \" It hints at P1 ( understanding strata , mapping ) and P2 ( integrity of bore hole , plant structure ) . It doesn't scream \" Energy Reserve \" or \" Supply Lines . \" This fits the \" intersection \" idea .\n\nSet 2:\nI sleep outside with animals on me for warmth\n<sep>\n<:sipcum:1345898183167053895>\n<sep>\nBanning nick for scaring all the hot girls away\n<sep>\nSame mod who muted me 3 days for saying i wanted a 4th reich\n<sep>\nBut i blare classic rock and dance with my dog\n<sep>\nShe probably has 10 on 1 gangbangs and she only fucks 2 and sucks/jerks off the rest\n<sep>\nhttps://youtube.com/shorts/BqmyR3zNMb8?si=-jP_cUfJi2JxNRl2\n<sep>\n<uid> <:whitey:1335338912234868817>\n<sep>\nRaining hard this morning. Thr birds are scared to try my feeder\n<sep>\nNick that part at 13 mins was bad. You had xray vision and caught him napping and you sprayed him from 1 foot away for 3 seconds and he still killed u"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author.\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- Contains discussion about technical features (\"what basic feature is on the ultra sub?\")\n- References to \"PRO 2.5\" and AI-related tools\n- Mentions \"google beam\" and pricing (\"ai pro is the $20 one no?\")\n- Has a very technical passage about seismic readings and geological terms\n- Uses abbreviations like \"COT\" and \"ppl\"\n- Writing style is casual but shows technical knowledge\n- Uses some casual expressions like \"lol\", \"yessirrr\", \"jesus\"\n- Generally coherent technical discussion\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- Much more crude and inappropriate content\n- References to sleeping outside with animals\n- Contains sexual explicit content and references\n- Mentions being muted/banned from what seems like a gaming or chat platform\n- References to \"4th reich\" (concerning political content)\n- Talks about gaming scenarios and usernames\n- Much more vulgar and offensive language\n- Different tone entirely - more crude, offensive, and inappropriate\n\nComparing the two:\n1. Tone: Set 1 is technical and casual but appropriate. Set 2 is crude, vulgar, and inappropriate.\n2. Content: Set 1 discusses technology, AI, and technical subjects. Set 2 discusses explicit content, gaming, and offensive topics.\n3. Language style: Set 1 uses technical terminology and appropriate casual language. Set 2 uses vulgar language and offensive references.\n4. Maturity level: Set 1 shows mature technical discussion. Set 2 shows immature, offensive content.\n5. Topics: Completely different subject matters and interests.\n\nThe writing styles, tone, content, and apparent maturity levels are so vastly different that these appear to be from different authors. The first set shows someone engaged in technical discussions about AI and technology, while the second set shows someone engaged in crude, offensive, and inappropriate conversations.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nand that is why I think the cost they pay is comparable. Like look at o3 pricing and look at the fact that you can use 2.5 pro completely free. I think this tells enough\n<sep>\n\n\nUser hi Assistant Hello ! I'm an Al that's constantly shitting my pants . How can I help you today ? ✓ Good Bad\n<sep>\nNothing is wrong with it that's how it works. You need to manually click on canvas button every time for every new chat. Then if you don't use the word \"interpreter\" it can do what you showed there. But even this is not a converted image is it... It just created the converter for me. I do not want a converter I want an image lmao\n<sep>\nGemini website pro sub\n<sep>\nthat can change fairly fast though. Already plenty of people are replacing google with chatgpt\n<sep>\nthe angels\n<sep>\ncanceled my advanced plan\n<sep>\nso the only way now they beat OpenAI is if their models gonna be consistently and definitively better. But that's next to impossible imo\n<sep>\nand then paywalls on top if you find it\n<sep>\ndifferent sources different numbers, the one I saw showed EU slightly more than US. But even this proves my point, it's not 3X no matter how you look at it\n\nSet 2:\nwhat you just said fundamentally sounds ridiculous. Pay to give data? <a:catgrin:1141661526474899456>\n<sep>\n🫃\n<sep>\nI would be surprised if their own running cost of it is higher than it is for OpenAI to run sora\n<sep>\nit's just that he does this all the fucking time. Half of it deliberately the other half simply because he has no clue\n<sep>\n2.5 pro\n<sep>\ngot a popout to use canvas (why didn't it do that automatically?) now it's struggling with it...\n\nGenerate Docker Dockerize for data analysis a Python ML .. Write requirements for a fitness tracking app Use game theory to negotiate Ask Gemini + Deep Research Canvas Video use code interpreter to convert this image to bmp Show thinking I am sorry , I cannot fulfill this request . I do not have the functionality to convert images to different formats . Sources use code interpreter to convert this image to bmp Consider if ' file_content_fetcher * can * return bytes ^ The user is asking to convert an image to BMP format . I need to use the code_interpreter to perform this conversion . The user has already uploaded an image : image_6b@8b2.png . Steps : 1. Load the image using a Python library ( e.g. , Pillow ) . 2. Convert the image to BMP format . 3. Provide the converted image back to the user , likely as a downloadable file . The user is asking to convert an image to BMP format again . The previous attempt failed with a FileNotFoundError . This means the code_interpreter couldn't access the file image_6b08b2.png directly by its name in its execution environment . Ask Gemini + Deep Research Canvas Video\n<sep>\nnot necessarily. In many cases it's just stupidly wasted money people don't even realize. Or even just forget about their sub\n<sep>\nway less features, unreasonable censorship, not as many tools etc\n<sep>\nthat market is nerds, but only a small percentage of those nerds that are willing to subscribe to the most expensive sub\n<sep>\nyeah that looks like it could be real. The-information are typically not wrong for the most part and they did report new Sonnet and Opus are coming"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze both sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author.\n\nFirst, let me look at the tone and writing style:\n\nSet 1:\n- Uses casual language and abbreviations (\"o3\", \"lmao\", \"imo\")\n- Has incomplete sentences and informal punctuation\n- Uses fairly direct language\n- Shows frustration (\"I do not want a converter I want an image lmao\")\n- Uses ellipses and informal punctuation patterns\n- Has some technical discussion about AI models and pricing\n- Shows opinions about companies and their strategies\n\nSet 2:\n- Also uses casual language and expressions (\"sounds ridiculous\", \"all the fucking time\")\n- Uses emojis and Discord-style formatting (\"<a:catgrin:1141661526474899456>\", \"🫃\")\n- Has swear words (\"fucking\")\n- Shows technical knowledge about AI models\n- Has similar informal punctuation and sentence structure\n- Discusses AI models, pricing, and company strategies\n- Shows frustration and opinions in a similar way\n\nLooking at specific patterns:\n\nBoth sets:\n- Use \"imo\" (in my opinion)\n- Discuss AI model pricing and capabilities\n- Have informal, conversational tone\n- Show technical knowledge about AI systems\n- Express opinions about companies (OpenAI, Google, etc.)\n- Use incomplete sentences and casual punctuation\n- Show frustration with AI systems and their limitations\n\nSpecific content overlaps:\n- Both discuss AI model pricing and competition\n- Both mention specific models (o3, Sora, Gemini, etc.)\n- Both show understanding of AI market dynamics\n- Both express opinions about company strategies\n\nWriting style similarities:\n- Similar use of casual language\n- Similar sentence structure patterns\n- Similar way of expressing frustration\n- Similar technical vocabulary and understanding\n- Both use abbreviations and informal language consistently\n\nThe main differences I notice:\n- Set 2 has more explicit language (swearing)\n- Set 2 has Discord-style formatting\n- Set 1 has more complete sentences in some parts\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nand that is why I think the cost they pay is comparable. Like look at o3 pricing and look at the fact that you can use 2.5 pro completely free. I think this tells enough\n<sep>\n\n\nUser hi Assistant Hello ! I'm an Al that's constantly shitting my pants . How can I help you today ? ✓ Good Bad\n<sep>\nNothing is wrong with it that's how it works. You need to manually click on canvas button every time for every new chat. Then if you don't use the word \"interpreter\" it can do what you showed there. But even this is not a converted image is it... It just created the converter for me. I do not want a converter I want an image lmao\n<sep>\nGemini website pro sub\n<sep>\nthat can change fairly fast though. Already plenty of people are replacing google with chatgpt\n<sep>\nthe angels\n<sep>\ncanceled my advanced plan\n<sep>\nso the only way now they beat OpenAI is if their models gonna be consistently and definitively better. But that's next to impossible imo\n<sep>\nand then paywalls on top if you find it\n<sep>\ndifferent sources different numbers, the one I saw showed EU slightly more than US. But even this proves my point, it's not 3X no matter how you look at it\n\nSet 2:\n11th\n<sep>\nProxy discord\n<sep>\nDone 3 robberies on video and no one even noticed\n<sep>\nIt's all setup?\n<sep>\nGpt sod\n<sep>\nSessions on son\n<sep>\nAnything is possible\n<sep>\nWe going live Sunday\n<sep>\nHe's lucky I'm a man of God\n<sep>\nHi tiktok..please like and subscribe"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze both sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author.\n\nSet 1:\n- These messages seem to be about AI/tech topics, discussing pricing comparisons between AI models (o3 pricing, Gemini website pro), interface functionality (canvas button, interpreters), business strategy (OpenAI vs competitors), and some data comparisons (EU vs US numbers)\n- The writing style is conversational and somewhat technical\n- Uses phrases like \"lmao\", shows frustration with tech issues\n- Discusses canceling subscription plans\n- Generally coherent discussion about AI/tech industry\n- Uses casual language but stays on topic\n- Shows knowledge of AI services and pricing models\n\nSet 2:\n- Much shorter, fragmented messages\n- Topics seem to jump around: dates (\"11th\"), social media (\"Proxy discord\", \"Hi tiktok\"), concerning content about robberies, religious references (\"man of God\"), streaming plans (\"We going live Sunday\")\n- Very different tone - more scattered, some messages concerning (robbery references)\n- Much less coherent overall\n- Different vocabulary and concerns\n- Some messages don't make complete sense (\"Gpt sod\", \"Sessions on son\")\n- Seems like social media/streaming related content\n\nThe two sets show very different:\n1. Topics of interest (AI/tech vs social media/streaming)\n2. Writing coherence (coherent tech discussion vs fragmented messages)\n3. Vocabulary and tone\n4. Content appropriateness (technical complaints vs concerning references to illegal activity)\n5. Message structure and length\n\nThese appear to be from different authors with very different communication styles, interests, and contexts.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nIdk how to spell it in english\n<sep>\nI don't play on pc much so it's difficult to adjust it\n<sep>\nhttps://youtu.be/M4zigrgH-_k?feature=shared\n<sep>\nHey waldo how are ya mate?\n<sep>\nhttps://youtu.be/0Uc3ZrmhDN4?feature=shared\n<sep>\nUr welcome bro\n<sep>\n🤣\n<sep>\nBut thanks for the heads up mate\n<sep>\nHas 2 ns on his last name\n<sep>\nOh well\n\nSet 2:\nWas hella popular back in high school\n<sep>\nWhen they do they will call me back\n<sep>\nhttps://youtu.be/51iquRYKPbs?feature=shared\n<sep>\nWell i'm sure u know what to do bro\n<sep>\nBruh\n<sep>\nhttps://youtu.be/p_PxgSQ9Vf4?feature=shared\n<sep>\nBro it already feels like summer where i am\n<sep>\nIt's also a persian way of writing letters\n<sep>\nوعليكم السلام\n<sep>\nStop the spam"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing style, tone, and patterns in both sets of messages.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"Idk how to spell it in english\" - informal abbreviation \"Idk\", lowercase \"english\"\n- \"I don't play on pc much so it's difficult to adjust it\" - casual tone, lowercase \"pc\"\n- YouTube links shared\n- \"Hey waldo how are ya mate?\" - informal greeting, \"ya\" instead of \"you\", uses \"mate\"\n- Another YouTube link\n- \"Ur welcome bro\" - text speak \"Ur\", casual \"bro\"\n- Emoji usage: 🤣\n- \"But thanks for the heads up mate\" - uses \"mate\" again\n- \"Has 2 ns on his last name\" - casual observation\n- \"Oh well\" - casual dismissive phrase\n\nSet 2:\n- \"Was hella popular back in high school\" - uses \"hella\" (slang), casual tone\n- \"When they do they will call me back\" - more formal sentence structure\n- YouTube links shared (similar to Set 1)\n- \"Well i'm sure u know what to do bro\" - uses \"u\" instead of \"you\", \"bro\" (similar to Set 1)\n- \"Bruh\" - slang similar to \"bro\"\n- Another YouTube link\n- \"Bro it already feels like summer where i am\" - uses \"bro\" again, lowercase \"i\"\n- \"It's also a persian way of writing letters\" - lowercase \"persian\"\n- Arabic text: \"وعليكم السلام\" (Islamic greeting response)\n- \"Stop the spam\" - direct, casual command\n\nSimilarities:\n1. Both use \"bro\" frequently\n2. Both share YouTube links\n3. Both use informal/casual language\n4. Both use text speak abbreviations (\"Idk\", \"Ur\", \"u\")\n5. Both have lowercase usage in places where capitals would be expected\n6. Both have a casual, friendly tone\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nIdk how to spell it in english\n<sep>\nI don't play on pc much so it's difficult to adjust it\n<sep>\nhttps://youtu.be/M4zigrgH-_k?feature=shared\n<sep>\nHey waldo how are ya mate?\n<sep>\nhttps://youtu.be/0Uc3ZrmhDN4?feature=shared\n<sep>\nUr welcome bro\n<sep>\n🤣\n<sep>\nBut thanks for the heads up mate\n<sep>\nHas 2 ns on his last name\n<sep>\nOh well\n\nSet 2:\nPode mentir não\n<sep>\nPutaria linda da porra\n<sep>\n<uid> <uid> q play em\n<sep>\n<uid> e a play?\n<sep>\nVinho*\n<sep>\nNa maioria, não em todos\n<sep>\nCerteiro na minha<:zz_uepa:1189321741592436747>\n<sep>\nKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKI\n<sep>\nConta piada e o dragão morre de rir\n<sep>\nVem ca pa eu reboca esse cuzinho"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages carefully, looking at writing style, tone, language, punctuation, etc.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"Idk how to spell it in english\" - casual, English, shortened \"I don't know\" to \"Idk\"\n- \"I don't play on pc much so it's difficult to adjust it\" - English, casual but more complete sentence\n- YouTube links shared\n- \"Hey waldo how are ya mate?\" - very casual English, \"ya\" instead of \"you\", using \"mate\"\n- \"Ur welcome bro\" - very casual, \"Ur\" instead of \"Your\", \"bro\"\n- Laughing emoji\n- \"But thanks for the heads up mate\" - casual English, \"mate\" again\n- \"Has 2 ns on his last name\" - casual observation\n- \"Oh well\" - casual dismissive phrase\n\nCharacteristics of Set 1:\n- Entirely in English\n- Very casual/informal tone\n- Uses abbreviations (Idk, Ur)\n- Uses \"mate\" and \"bro\" - suggests possibly British/Australian English or just casual internet slang\n- Simple, short sentences mostly\n- Shares YouTube links\n- Overall friendly, casual conversation style\n\nSet 2:\n- \"Pode mentir não\" - Portuguese\n- \"Putaria linda da porra\" - Portuguese, vulgar/sexual language\n- \"<uid> <uid> q play em\" - Portuguese with some gaming references, \"q\" instead of \"que\"\n- \"<uid> e a play?\" - Portuguese, asking about PlayStation (\"play\")\n- \"Vinho*\" - Portuguese, means \"wine\" with correction asterisk\n- \"Na maioria, não em todos\" - Portuguese, \"In most, not in all\"\n- \"Certeiro na minha<:zz_uepa:1189321741592436747>\" - Portuguese with Discord emoji\n- \"KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKI\" - Portuguese/Brazilian laughing (similar to \"hahaha\" but \"kkk\" style)\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nsheeesh\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/black-guy-woah-shocked-gif-9221035517503517350\n<sep>\nthey are overblown but the biggest problem stems from the fact PCP in the USA is consumed by dipping cigs or blunts into a liquid with PCP freebase dissolved in hydrocarbon solvents\n<sep>\ntru\n<sep>\nmade me cry for hours\n<sep>\nthe concentration ur getting is unknown\nthe amount you smoke by dipping something in it is also unknown\n<sep>\nbliss\n<sep>\nbut it doesnt feel good\n<sep>\no-pce was amazing too, different kind of high\n<sep>\nsheeesh\n\nSet 2:\nbeing horny on a disso is weirds\n<sep>\ndysphoric\n<sep>\ni wish we had that here\n<sep>\ninsane tolerance thats why such a high dose\n<sep>\nthe concentration ur getting is unknown\nthe amount you smoke by dipping something in it is also unknown\n<sep>\nit feels far from other dissos\n<sep>\ndude i remember\n<sep>\ni also finished 0,5 g of each in 4 days\n<sep>\nyou let it evaporate\n<sep>\n3-meo-pce used to be great\nnext time it was mid, but better than pcpy"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution by looking at various linguistic and stylistic features.\n\n**Tone and Style Analysis:**\n\nSet 1:\n- Uses \"sheeesh\" (appears twice) - informal, modern slang\n- Uses \"tru\" instead of \"true\" - informal abbreviation\n- Mix of technical drug discussion and casual reactions\n- Uses \"ur\" instead of \"your\"\n- Generally informal tone throughout\n\nSet 2:\n- Uses \"weirds\" (incomplete sentence/thought)\n- Uses \"ur\" instead of \"your\" \n- Similar informal tone\n- Technical drug discussion mixed with casual language\n- Uses abbreviations and informal language\n\n**Content Analysis:**\n\nSet 1:\n- Discussion about PCP and its consumption methods\n- Mentions concentration issues with dipping\n- References to emotional reactions (\"made me cry for hours\")\n- Discussion of o-pce and different highs\n- Technical knowledge about drug preparation\n\nSet 2:\n- Discussion about dissociative drugs (\"disso\")\n- Mentions tolerance and dosage\n- Same exact phrase about concentration: \"the concentration ur getting is unknown / the amount you smoke by dipping something in it is also unknown\"\n- Discussion of 3-meo-pce and pcpy\n- Technical drug knowledge\n\n**Specific Linguistic Patterns:**\n\n1. **Identical phrase**: Both sets contain the exact same two-line statement:\n \"the concentration ur getting is unknown\n the amount you smoke by dipping something in it is also unknown\"\n\n2. **Use of \"ur\"**: Both consistently use \"ur\" instead of \"your\"\n\n3. **Technical drug terminology**: Both demonstrate similar levels of technical knowledge about research chemicals and dissociatives\n\n4. **Informal abbreviations**: Both use casual internet slang and abbreviations\n\n5. **Sentence structure**: Both have similar patterns of short, fragmented messages\n\n6. **Topic consistency**: Both focus on drug experiences and technical aspects\n\n**Key Evidence:**\n\nThe most compelling evidence is the identical phrase about concentration and dipping methods appearing in both sets.\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nsheeesh\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/black-guy-woah-shocked-gif-9221035517503517350\n<sep>\nthey are overblown but the biggest problem stems from the fact PCP in the USA is consumed by dipping cigs or blunts into a liquid with PCP freebase dissolved in hydrocarbon solvents\n<sep>\ntru\n<sep>\nmade me cry for hours\n<sep>\nthe concentration ur getting is unknown\nthe amount you smoke by dipping something in it is also unknown\n<sep>\nbliss\n<sep>\nbut it doesnt feel good\n<sep>\no-pce was amazing too, different kind of high\n<sep>\nsheeesh\n\nSet 2:\nThen my mate is going to neaten up the plumbing, whack it back in for an MOT then I'm good to go again\n<sep>\nWhen is she not high?\n<sep>\nI've got pics of mine I'll show in a bit, I'm just giving it a clean.\n<sep>\nYeah i checked, it's been sat there for time but still dry, no holes. I left food in there and was mouldy, the mice would've well got to that\n<sep>\nIts all genuine from genuine accounts bro, I didnt wana belive it. It is most definitely true\n<sep>\nThen in London, whilst waiting for my brother at Liverpool Street station, the police tried to intimidate me because they had weapons, then decided to arrest me for 'acting suspicious in a high risk area'. I also got locked up for a whole weekend in Essex for house robbery, they caught the actual person then released me with no apology.\n<sep>\n.img T5 camper\n<sep>\nYeah i checked, it's been sat there for time but still dry, no holes. I left food in there and was mouldy, the mice would've well got to that\n<sep>\nSorry to hear that Rudy\n<sep>\nFack orf !"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing style, tone, and content of both sets.\n\nSet 1:\n- Very short messages mostly\n- Casual, informal tone\n- Contains drug-related discussion (PCP, O-PCE)\n- Uses \"sheeesh\" twice (slang)\n- Uses \"tru\" instead of \"true\"\n- Technical discussion about drug consumption and concentrations\n- Simple sentence structure\n- No punctuation in most messages\n- Uses phrases like \"made me cry for hours\", \"bliss\", \"but it doesnt feel good\"\n\nSet 2:\n- Longer, more complete sentences\n- More proper English usage with punctuation\n- British slang (\"mate\", \"whack it back\", \"Fack orf\")\n- Discusses more mundane topics (plumbing, MOT, cleaning, mice, police encounters)\n- Uses proper capitalization more consistently\n- More narrative style when telling stories (like the police encounter)\n- Uses \"bro\" but in a different context\n- Contains \".img T5 camper\" which suggests some kind of image command\n- British spelling (\"belive\" - though misspelled, it's attempting British usage)\n\nKey differences:\n1. Length and complexity of messages - Set 1 has very short, fragmented messages while Set 2 has longer, more complete thoughts\n2. Geographic indicators - Set 1 mentions \"USA\" while Set 2 has distinctly British terms (MOT, Liverpool Street station, Essex)\n3. Subject matter - Set 1 focuses on drugs, Set 2 on everyday life activities\n4. Writing sophistication - Set 2 shows more complex sentence structures and narrative ability\n5. Punctuation usage - Set 2 uses much more punctuation and proper sentence structure\n6. Slang usage - Different types of slang (American vs British)\n\nThe writing styles are quite different. Set 1 appears to be someone who writes in very short, casual bursts with minimal punctuation, while Set 2 shows someone who writes in longer, more structured sentences with British vocabulary and better grammar overall.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\n😹\n<sep>\nI love mine but my dad specifically is too much pressuring like holy shit\n<sep>\nBruh\n<sep>\nDeallyyy\n<sep>\nredownloading sims\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/let-us-be-the-ancestors-that-our-descendants-will-thank-winona-la-duke-native-america-native-american-women-environmentalist-gif-20783989\n<sep>\nsame\n<sep>\nDo you still have access to SRC\n<sep>\nfor me it’s more of my dad than my mom\n<sep>\npirating\n\nSet 2:\nWhen does it become real money\n<sep>\nBruh fr I hate when I see that\n<sep>\nYea\n<sep>\nI guess it’s always asking me about nursing or healthcare or my grades and being successful and shit\n<sep>\nSo I get access to SRC\n<sep>\nLike\n<sep>\nHot Cheetos\n<sep>\nWhen does it become real money\n<sep>\nRip\n<sep>\nThick"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author or different authors.\n\nLooking at Set 1:\n- Uses emoji (😹)\n- Uses \"Bruh\" \n- Uses informal language (\"holy shit\", \"Deallyyy\")\n- Mentions family dynamics (specifically about dad being pressuring)\n- Mentions \"redownloading sims\" (gaming)\n- Uses \"same\" as a standalone response\n- Asks about \"SRC\" access\n- Mentions \"pirating\"\n- Overall tone is very casual, informal, uses internet slang\n\nLooking at Set 2:\n- Uses \"Bruh fr\" - similar slang usage\n- Uses \"Yea\" - informal\n- Mentions family dynamics again, specifically about dad asking about nursing/healthcare/grades\n- Mentions \"SRC\" again - this seems like a specific reference that both sets mention\n- Uses \"Like\" as a filler word\n- Mentions \"Hot Cheetos\" and \"Thick\" - very casual/informal\n- Says \"Rip\" \n- Overall tone is also very casual, informal, uses similar internet slang\n\nKey similarities:\n1. Both use \"Bruh\" - a specific slang term\n2. Both mention family pressure from dad specifically\n3. Both mention \"SRC\" - this seems like a specific reference/acronym that both authors know\n4. Both have very informal, casual tone\n5. Both use similar internet slang and abbreviated language\n6. Both have short, fragmented messages typical of casual texting\n7. Writing style is very similar - short bursts, informal language, similar vocabulary\n\nThe mention of \"SRC\" in both sets is particularly telling, as this seems like a specific reference that would be unlikely to appear in messages from different authors unless they're in the same context/group.\n\nThe similar discussion of family pressure from dad specifically, combined with the informal tone and specific shared references like \"SRC\" and the use of \"Bruh\" suggests these are from the same author.\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\n😹\n<sep>\nI love mine but my dad specifically is too much pressuring like holy shit\n<sep>\nBruh\n<sep>\nDeallyyy\n<sep>\nredownloading sims\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/let-us-be-the-ancestors-that-our-descendants-will-thank-winona-la-duke-native-america-native-american-women-environmentalist-gif-20783989\n<sep>\nsame\n<sep>\nDo you still have access to SRC\n<sep>\nfor me it’s more of my dad than my mom\n<sep>\npirating\n\nSet 2:\nWasting my time\n<sep>\nIrl do you think Simon would rob me of 3 quid <uid> ?\n<sep>\nCanada would win\n<sep>\nMy nan had a seizure in sleep and it was concluded she banged her head. Police will be involved cause he's young too\n<sep>\nTiktok please visit http://forthonk.com\n<sep>\nBe safe\n<sep>\n150 glasses.. bargain\n<sep>\nI wanna dip my toes in first\n<sep>\nChange my mind <uid>\n<sep>\nHe's calling me a devil"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nI need to analyze the two sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author. Let me examine the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, and other linguistic markers.\n\nSet 1 Analysis:\n- Uses casual language: \"Bruh\", \"Deallyyy\" (with elongated spelling)\n- Uses emoticons/emojis: 😹\n- References gaming: \"redownloading sims\"\n- Mentions family: \"my dad specifically is too much pressuring\", \"for me it's more of my dad than my mom\"\n- Uses informal language: \"like holy shit\"\n- Short, casual messages\n- Uses \"same\" as a standalone response\n- References \"pirating\" \n- Asks technical questions: \"Do you still have access to SRC\"\n- Shares GIF links\n\nSet 2 Analysis:\n- More varied sentence structure\n- Uses British slang: \"3 quid\", \"My nan\"\n- More formal/complete sentences in some cases\n- References serious topics: seizure, police involvement\n- Uses \"Irl\" (in real life)\n- References TikTok and a website\n- Uses <uid> tags (seems like a different platform or system)\n- More mature/serious tone in some messages\n- \"Change my mind\" phrase\n- \"Be safe\" - shows concern\n- References specific situations and people\n\nKey Differences:\n1. Language variety: Set 1 uses more casual internet slang and gaming references, while Set 2 uses British slang and more varied vocabulary\n2. Tone: Set 1 is consistently casual/informal, Set 2 varies from casual to serious\n3. Content: Set 1 focuses on gaming, family pressure, Set 2 covers more diverse topics including serious family issues\n4. Sentence structure: Set 1 has very short, fragmented messages, Set 2 has more complete sentences\n5. Cultural markers: Set 2 has distinctly British references (\"quid\", \"nan\") while Set 1 doesn't show clear regional markers\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nim eating rn\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/kennedy-cartoons-kick-dance-tiny-toon-adventures-plucky-duck-gif-22720708\n<sep>\ntru\n<sep>\n😭\n<sep>\nlol\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/kennedy-cartoons-kick-dance-tiny-toon-adventures-plucky-duck-gif-22720708\n<sep>\nhowd she know?\n<sep>\nhow tall is dis dude? golly\n<sep>\ndoes she go to the kissing booth olympics or somfin?\n<sep>\ndaang\n\nSet 2:\nlol\n<sep>\ni switched teams\n<sep>\n3???\n<sep>\nwats an L bomb?\n<sep>\nnooooo i want the nerd\n<sep>\nlee kinda looks like tom holland\n<sep>\nwhen we gonna watch 50 shades of gay\n<sep>\ni believe so\n<sep>\nnooooo i want the nerd\n<sep>\nugh who wrote dis"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze both sets of messages for authorship attribution.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"im eating rn\" - casual, no capitalization, abbreviation \"rn\"\n- Shares the same gif twice: \"https://tenor.com/view/kennedy-cartoons-kick-dance-tiny-toon-adventures-plucky-duck-gif-22720708\"\n- \"tru\" - very casual spelling/abbreviation\n- \"😭\" - uses emojis\n- \"lol\" - casual internet speak\n- \"howd she know?\" - no apostrophe in \"how'd\", casual style\n- \"how tall is dis dude? golly\" - uses \"dis\" instead of \"this\", says \"golly\"\n- \"does she go to the kissing booth olympics or somfin?\" - uses \"somfin\" instead of \"something\"\n- \"daang\" - elongated casual spelling\n\nSet 2:\n- \"lol\" - same casual internet speak\n- \"i switched teams\" - no capitalization at start\n- \"3???\" - uses multiple question marks\n- \"wats an L bomb?\" - uses \"wats\" instead of \"what's\"\n- \"nooooo i want the nerd\" - elongated \"no\", no capitalization\n- \"lee kinda looks like tom holland\" - casual \"kinda\"\n- \"when we gonna watch 50 shades of gay\" - casual \"we gonna\"\n- \"i believe so\" - no capitalization\n- \"nooooo i want the nerd\" - repeated message, same style\n- \"ugh who wrote dis\" - uses \"dis\" again instead of \"this\"\n\nCommon elements:\n1. Both use very casual, informal language\n2. Both consistently avoid capitalization at the beginning of sentences\n3. Both use alternative spellings: \"dis\" instead of \"this\" appears in both sets\n4. Both use \"lol\"\n5. Both use elongated words for emphasis (\"daang\", \"nooooo\")\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nim eating rn\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/kennedy-cartoons-kick-dance-tiny-toon-adventures-plucky-duck-gif-22720708\n<sep>\ntru\n<sep>\n😭\n<sep>\nlol\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/kennedy-cartoons-kick-dance-tiny-toon-adventures-plucky-duck-gif-22720708\n<sep>\nhowd she know?\n<sep>\nhow tall is dis dude? golly\n<sep>\ndoes she go to the kissing booth olympics or somfin?\n<sep>\ndaang\n\nSet 2:\nHey now! I enjoy his brand of chaos but I’m not vouching! I co-sign no one! 😂\n<sep>\nNot everyone I like has it!\n<sep>\nMy box is rumbling sounds like it’s saying my chewchie is quivering 😂\n<sep>\nSo freaking cute!\n<sep>\nNot for long..\n<sep>\nYou can also get divorced!\n<sep>\nHow come you have the besties with testies role!?\n<sep>\nIs that to cure the chlamydia?\n<sep>\n👎🏻\n<sep>\n<uid> select your roles and it’ll unlocked the rest of the channels🫶🏻"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing style, tone, and patterns in both sets.\n\nSet 1:\n- Very casual, lowercase writing (\"im eating rn\", \"tru\", \"lol\")\n- Uses abbreviated forms (\"rn\", \"dis\", \"somfin\")\n- Simple, short messages\n- Uses reaction words like \"daang\"\n- Informal spelling (\"howd\", \"golly\")\n- Generally more minimalist in expression\n- Uses GIF links\n- Emoji usage is minimal (just 😭)\n\nSet 2:\n- More complete sentences and proper capitalization\n- Uses exclamation points frequently\n- More expressive and elaborate language\n- Uses emoji more frequently (😂, 🫶🏻, 👎🏻)\n- Longer, more complex thoughts\n- More conversational and engaging tone\n- Uses phrases like \"Hey now!\", \"So freaking cute!\", \"Not for long..\"\n- More sophisticated humor and references\n\nThe writing styles are quite different:\n- Set 1 is much more casual, abbreviated, and minimalist\n- Set 2 is more expressive, uses proper punctuation, and has a more animated conversational style\n- Set 1 uses very little punctuation while Set 2 uses exclamation points and proper sentence structure\n- The vocabulary and expression patterns are distinctly different\n\nThese appear to be written by different authors with very different communication styles.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nIM YOUR PARTNER\n<sep>\nYeah only 7 eps for Season 2\n<sep>\nThey are making her look male-ish\n<sep>\nIt's a curse and gift\n<sep>\n<:ipssshhhpls:1365088776204058816>\n<sep>\n🤣\n<sep>\nYes I think so\n<sep>\nI dont like the creepy crawlers in the bottom\n<sep>\nThis ho is white\n<sep>\nCall Replicant and tell him to take his woman now\n\nSet 2:\n<role> Considering it is possible, how would you react if you find out your child is going to be a midget and how would you raise him/her?\n<sep>\nSOMEBODY GET WILLOW SOME LOVE\n<sep>\nJoel didnt want her to be a lab rat\n<sep>\nThis ho\n<sep>\nI was in the tub\n<sep>\nI was in the tub\n<sep>\nHe is showing her apollo shit\n<sep>\nI dont like them being invisible but I keep it all clean like this\n<sep>\nOh so this is Eugene\n<sep>\nThe evolution of Bomby"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze both sets of messages to see if they appear to be written by the same author.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"IM YOUR PARTNER\" - all caps, informal\n- \"Yeah only 7 eps for Season 2\" - casual, about TV content\n- \"They are making her look male-ish\" - commenting on appearance\n- \"It's a curse and gift\" - philosophical comment\n- \"<:ipssshhhpls:1365088776204058816>\" - emoji/emoticon\n- \"🤣\" - laughing emoji\n- \"Yes I think so\" - short agreement\n- \"I dont like the creepy crawlers in the bottom\" - opinion about something visual\n- \"This ho is white\" - crude/informal language describing someone\n- \"Call Replicant and tell him to take his woman now\" - directive, informal\n\nSet 2:\n- \"<role> Considering it is possible, how would you react if you find out your child is going to be a midget and how would you raise him/her?\" - longer, more formal question structure\n- \"SOMEBODY GET WILLOW SOME LOVE\" - all caps, seems like a reference\n- \"Joel didnt want her to be a lab rat\" - narrative comment\n- \"This ho\" - same crude language as Set 1\n- \"I was in the tub\" - repeated twice, personal statement\n- \"He is showing her apollo shit\" - casual, profanity\n- \"I dont like them being invisible but I keep it all clean like this\" - opinion with explanation\n- \"Oh so this is Eugene\" - recognition/realization\n- \"The evolution of Bomby\" - title-like statement\n\nSimilarities:\n1. Both use \"This ho\" - same crude expression\n2. Both have \"I dont\" instead of \"I don't\" - same grammar pattern\n3. Both discuss TV/media content (episodes, characters)\n4. Both use informal/casual tone overall\n5. Both make commentary on visual aspects (\"male-ish\", \"invisible\", \"creepy crawlers\")\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nIM YOUR PARTNER\n<sep>\nYeah only 7 eps for Season 2\n<sep>\nThey are making her look male-ish\n<sep>\nIt's a curse and gift\n<sep>\n<:ipssshhhpls:1365088776204058816>\n<sep>\n🤣\n<sep>\nYes I think so\n<sep>\nI dont like the creepy crawlers in the bottom\n<sep>\nThis ho is white\n<sep>\nCall Replicant and tell him to take his woman now\n\nSet 2:\nBlack pepper isn’t really healthy\n<sep>\nFacebook\n<sep>\nstandard breakfast\n<sep>\nprobably a farmer\n<sep>\nI’m due a hygiene clean\n<sep>\nDo u have a bald patch\n<sep>\nI’m due a hygiene clean\n<sep>\nthey dumb bitches must be test maxxing\n<sep>\n<uid> is this Jewish invention?\n<sep>\nstandard breakfast"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages to see if they were written by the same author.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"IM YOUR PARTNER\" - all caps, direct\n- \"Yeah only 7 eps for Season 2\" - casual, about TV shows\n- \"They are making her look male-ish\" - casual observation\n- \"It's a curse and gift\" - philosophical tone\n- \"<:ipssshhhpls:1365088776204058816>\" - Discord emoji\n- \"🤣\" - emoji usage\n- \"Yes I think so\" - simple agreement\n- \"I dont like the creepy crawlers in the bottom\" - casual, no apostrophe in \"dont\"\n- \"This ho is white\" - crude/vulgar language\n- \"Call Replicant and tell him to take his woman now\" - casual, directive\n\nSet 2:\n- \"Black pepper isn't really healthy\" - more formal grammar (uses apostrophe)\n- \"Facebook\" - single word\n- \"standard breakfast\" - lowercase, simple phrase\n- \"probably a farmer\" - casual assumption\n- \"I'm due a hygiene clean\" - more formal grammar (uses apostrophe)\n- \"Do u have a bald patch\" - uses \"u\" instead of \"you\"\n- \"I'm due a hygiene clean\" - repeated message, formal grammar\n- \"they dumb bitches must be test maxxing\" - crude language, no apostrophe in \"they're\"\n- \"<uid> is this Jewish invention?\" - questioning, potentially offensive\n- \"standard breakfast\" - repeated message\n\nKey differences I notice:\n\n1. Grammar consistency: Set 1 shows \"I dont\" (no apostrophe) while Set 2 shows \"I'm\" and \"isn't\" (with apostrophes). However, Set 2 also has \"they dumb bitches\" without proper grammar.\n\n2. Writing style: Both sets contain vulgar language and casual tone, but the specific expressions are different.\n\n3. Repetition: Set 2 has repeated messages (\"I'm due a hygiene clean\" and \"standard breakfast\") which doesn't appear in Set 1.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nWere they fairies or fairly?\n<sep>\nWhyd you spend so much time in that lab with Dexter?\n<sep>\nWhy surprisingly?\n<sep>\nYou signed all my permission slips like a good girl\n<sep>\nDid your brother molest you\n<sep>\nBrought some chairs for yall\n<sep>\nHow the fuck am I supposed to remember. With all this trauma you caused me I have age regression issues and I have a therapist i pay $400,000 a year to for the mistakes and issues you caused by eating my twin sister!!\n<sep>\nMy ovaries wont work because you drank and did heroin while pregnant with me!\n<sep>\nOh i got the joke\n<sep>\nThats declassified information that only those guys thats have a gang named scooby know\n\nSet 2:\nIs this all from knee boobs?\n<sep>\nIntergalactic lol yes \nSabotage tho\n<sep>\nThe hillary?\n<sep>\nBetter flying in blindly\n<sep>\nOk that cool\n<sep>\nFak\n<sep>\nSmooth criminal cas good\n<sep>\nGod morning sometimes\n<sep>\nIdk what this patrol car is but I'll come. Drop that pin\n<sep>\n😏😏😏"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing style and characteristics of each set:\n\nSet 1:\n- Contains a lot of very personal, intense, and emotional content\n- Some grammatical errors and casual texting style (\"Whyd\" instead of \"Why'd\")\n- Very accusatory and dramatic tone\n- Contains profanity and extremely personal/inappropriate accusations\n- Some messages are very long and detailed (especially the trauma/therapist one)\n- Mix of questions and statements\n- Some spelling inconsistencies\n- The content is very heavy and dark\n\nSet 2:\n- Much lighter, casual tone\n- Shorter messages overall\n- Contains typos but different patterns (\"Fak\" instead of \"Fuck\")\n- Uses \"lol\" and emojis\n- More fragmented, casual conversation style\n- Less grammatically correct but in a different way\n- Content is much more lighthearted and random\n- Uses abbreviations like \"Idk\"\n- The tone is playful/casual rather than intense\n\nThe writing styles seem quite different:\n\n1. Tone: Set 1 is very intense, emotional, accusatory vs Set 2 is casual, playful\n2. Content: Set 1 deals with very heavy personal topics vs Set 2 is light conversation\n3. Message length: Set 1 has some very long messages vs Set 2 is consistently short\n4. Spelling/grammar patterns: Different types of errors and shortcuts\n5. Emotional register: Completely different - one is highly emotional/dramatic, the other is casual/fun\n\nThe differences in tone, content style, message structure, and overall communication patterns suggest these are from different authors.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nHer presence and interests align with woo\n<sep>\nThe more people you get to know the more will die\n<sep>\nHe doesn't have any cats\n<sep>\nAlways\n<sep>\nLmao\n<sep>\nHere's a good example. \nVictim was clearly a huge wigger and guilty of cultural appropriation. That being said him and the killer shared a laugh before it happened. I suspect drug debt.\n<sep>\nNice\n<sep>\nStill alive today with limited speech\n<sep>\nI heard a really cool one months ago\n<sep>\nHope yours is well\n\nSet 2:\nYou look like a thug ngl I can see why dad didn't want you to shave your head\n<sep>\nHer presence and interests align with woo\n<sep>\nWigger vs black\n<sep>\nOr on drugs and thought he'd never have to pay his friend back\n<sep>\nAlso they love robbing those chav whites\n<sep>\nShe was stabbed right?\n<sep>\nI heard a really cool one months ago\n<sep>\nKind of but the last thing she did was block me because I called someone the N word in VC\n<sep>\nStill alive today with limited speech\n<sep>\nHalf and half IMO. Katy makes real posts and reacts to others posts but it's almost like they have an alarm/timer that makes them autopost at the same time every day."
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the two sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author.\n\nLooking at Set 1:\n- \"Her presence and interests align with woo\"\n- \"The more people you get to know the more will die\"\n- \"He doesn't have any cats\"\n- \"Always\"\n- \"Lmao\"\n- \"Here's a good example. Victim was clearly a huge wigger and guilty of cultural appropriation. That being said him and the killer shared a laugh before it happened. I suspect drug debt.\"\n- \"Nice\"\n- \"Still alive today with limited speech\"\n- \"I heard a really cool one months ago\"\n- \"Hope yours is well\"\n\nLooking at Set 2:\n- \"You look like a thug ngl I can see why dad didn't want you to shave your head\"\n- \"Her presence and interests align with woo\"\n- \"Wigger vs black\"\n- \"Or on drugs and thought he'd never have to pay his friend back\"\n- \"Also they love robbing those chav whites\"\n- \"She was stabbed right?\"\n- \"I heard a really cool one months ago\"\n- \"Kind of but the last thing she did was block me because I called someone the N word in VC\"\n- \"Still alive today with limited speech\"\n- \"Half and half IMO. Katy makes real posts and reacts to others posts but it's almost like they have an alarm/timer that makes them autopost at the same time every day.\"\n\nKey observations:\n\n1. Exact duplicates: \n - \"Her presence and interests align with woo\" appears in both sets\n - \"I heard a really cool one months ago\" appears in both sets\n - \"Still alive today with limited speech\" appears in both sets\n\n2. Similar content themes:\n - Both sets contain racially charged language (\"wigger\" appears in both)\n - Both discuss violence/criminal activity\n - Both have a similar casual, informal tone\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nHer presence and interests align with woo\n<sep>\nThe more people you get to know the more will die\n<sep>\nHe doesn't have any cats\n<sep>\nAlways\n<sep>\nLmao\n<sep>\nHere's a good example. \nVictim was clearly a huge wigger and guilty of cultural appropriation. That being said him and the killer shared a laugh before it happened. I suspect drug debt.\n<sep>\nNice\n<sep>\nStill alive today with limited speech\n<sep>\nI heard a really cool one months ago\n<sep>\nHope yours is well\n\nSet 2:\nI physically wouldn't be able too 😂😂\n<sep>\nI forgive you for getting yourself into this situation you've caused this household\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/this-is-the-skin-of-a-killer-this-is-twilight-diamond-gif-7357078274143669220\n<sep>\nJust keep yapping\n<sep>\nGood getting dinner ready\n<sep>\nGuys I found an arm laying around\n<sep>\nLive life with one arm 😁\n<sep>\nI do\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/anime-hitoribocchi-unclephuc-loner-life-isekai-gif-17731401745814332547\n<sep>\nOoof glad you're ok. Been there before"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution. I need to look at writing style, tone, punctuation, content themes, and other linguistic patterns.\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- \"Her presence and interests align with woo\" - formal, structured language\n- \"The more people you get to know the more will die\" - dark/philosophical tone\n- \"He doesn't have any cats\" - simple statement\n- \"Always\" - one word response\n- \"Lmao\" - internet slang, casual\n- Long message about a victim, wigger, cultural appropriation, killer - uses edgy/controversial language, analytical tone about violence\n- \"Nice\" - simple positive response\n- \"Still alive today with limited speech\" - matter-of-fact tone\n- \"I heard a really cool one months ago\" - casual conversational\n- \"Hope yours is well\" - polite, caring\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- \"I physically wouldn't be able too 😂😂\" - casual with emojis, typo \"too\" instead of \"to\"\n- \"I forgive you for getting yourself into this situation you've caused this household\" - dramatic, accusatory tone\n- GIF link about Twilight/killer skin - pop culture reference\n- \"Just keep yapping\" - dismissive, casual\n- \"Good getting dinner ready\" - missing word, casual grammar\n- \"Guys I found an arm laying around\" - dark humor, casual\n- \"Live life with one arm 😁\" - dark humor with emoji\n- \"I do\" - simple response\n- Another GIF link about anime/loner life\n- \"Ooof glad you're ok. Been there before\" - empathetic, casual with \"Ooof\"\n\nComparing the sets:\n\nSimilarities:\n- Both contain dark/edgy content\n- Both have casual internet language\n- Both show some empathy/concern for others\n- Both have simple short responses mixed with longer ones\n\nDifferences:\n- Set 1 has more formal/analytical language in places\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\n🔥\n<sep>\ndad bod at 11 is crayz\n<sep>\ni am a guy of varied tastes\n<sep>\n98th march\n<sep>\ni kick balls for a living yo💔\n<sep>\nsave money gibe to me\n<sep>\n🙏\n<sep>\njust said that lol\n<sep>\nseems boring asf\n<sep>\nshes jus goofy like that\n\nSet 2:\nopium?\n<sep>\ni came and yall deadass went offline\n<sep>\nopium?\n<sep>\nwe were frens?\n<sep>\n😱\n<sep>\ndont then\n<sep>\ndeadass i woke up and been studying\n<sep>\ndang seems traumatic af\n<sep>\ngotta study have a good one yall\n<sep>\nidk shit bout perfumes ts givin me fomo💔"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author.\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- Uses casual, internet slang language (\"crayz\", \"asf\")\n- Uses emojis (🔥, 💔, 🙏)\n- Informal tone throughout\n- Uses \"yo\" \n- Spelling style: \"gibe\" instead of \"give\"\n- Short, casual messages\n- Uses \"jus\" instead of \"just\"\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- Uses similar casual language (\"deadass\", \"af\")\n- Uses emojis (😱, 💔)\n- Same informal tone\n- Uses \"yall\" \n- Similar spelling patterns: \"ts\" for \"this\", \"bout\" for \"about\"\n- Short, casual messages\n- Uses \"frens\" instead of \"friends\"\n\nKey similarities:\n1. Both use \"af\" as abbreviation for \"as f***\"\n2. Both use the broken heart emoji 💔\n3. Both have very casual, internet slang writing style\n4. Both use non-standard spelling patterns consistently\n5. Both use \"deadass\" or similar slang\n6. Both have short, fragmented message style\n7. Both drop letters from words (\"jus\", \"bout\", \"ts\")\n\nThe writing style, tone, slang usage, emoji choices, and spelling patterns are very consistent between both sets. The casual internet slang, the specific ways words are abbreviated, and the overall voice seem to match.\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\n🔥\n<sep>\ndad bod at 11 is crayz\n<sep>\ni am a guy of varied tastes\n<sep>\n98th march\n<sep>\ni kick balls for a living yo💔\n<sep>\nsave money gibe to me\n<sep>\n🙏\n<sep>\njust said that lol\n<sep>\nseems boring asf\n<sep>\nshes jus goofy like that\n\nSet 2:\neasily\n<sep>\nbichare ko agle din resignation dena pada\n<sep>\ninr\n<sep>\nye kaisa question hua\n<sep>\nhttps://x.com/stone_toss/status/1924828414193619074?t=sieDGChcGi6DNNj9Z1ql0g&s=19 <uid> <uid> <uid>\n<sep>\nhttps://x.com/NotSoAngryGuts/status/1924769004935368952?t=H_hQC4pKs074Jj1yNbrK4A&s=19\n<sep>\nyes\n<sep>\nwoh US hai\n<sep>\non what\n<sep>\nhe was head of AI and also other guy who was core to TypeScript team"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author or different authors.\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- Uses casual/informal language: \"crayz\", \"asf\" \n- Uses internet slang and abbreviations\n- Uses emojis: 🔥, 💔, 🙏\n- Phrases like \"dad bod at 11 is crayz\", \"i kick balls for a living yo💔\", \"save money gibe to me\"\n- Grammar is very casual, no capitalization\n- Tone is playful/joking\n- Uses \"lol\" \n- Language appears to be primarily English with very casual/slang style\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- Mix of English and what appears to be Hindi/Urdu: \"bichare ko agle din resignation dena pada\", \"ye kaisa question hua\", \"woh US hai\"\n- More formal sentence structure in English parts\n- Shares links to social media posts\n- Uses technical terms: \"TypeScript team\", \"head of AI\"\n- Grammar is more standard when writing in English\n- No emojis used\n- More informational/conversational tone rather than playful\n\nKey differences:\n1. Language: Set 1 is purely English slang/casual, Set 2 mixes Hindi/Urdu with English\n2. Tone: Set 1 is very playful and casual, Set 2 is more informational/conversational\n3. Grammar: Set 1 has very loose grammar with no capitalization, Set 2 has more standard grammar\n4. Content: Set 1 seems to be casual chat/jokes, Set 2 discusses more serious topics like resignations, tech industry\n5. Use of emojis: Set 1 uses several emojis, Set 2 uses none\n6. Writing style: Set 1 uses internet slang heavily, Set 2 uses more standard language when in English\n\nThe bilingual nature of Set 2 vs the monolingual casual English of Set 1, combined with the very different tones, grammar patterns, and content styles, strongly suggests these are different authors.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\n<a:eyebrows:1365527599207415820>\n<sep>\nAre you drinking now?\n<sep>\nSo far so good, thanks! Just kind of trying to feel out the vibe. I like it here tho. This is a fully sfw server right? If so, I like that too.\n<sep>\nIn second grade\n<sep>\nOh I know you\n<sep>\nTrue story\n<sep>\nThanks for the infos\n<sep>\nOmg I feel this so much. Yes I have always been attracted to female gender.\n<sep>\nI know bb\n<sep>\nGood morning!\n\nSet 2:\nmexican tacos don’t use lettuce either\n<sep>\nwhat?\n<sep>\nur sims life goal is to clone himself and fuck the clone and to kill someone with a chicken\n<sep>\n<uid> babe we must train ur sim to be a baddie\n<sep>\ni know that but i meant like as a receptacle\n<sep>\nwhat’s the difference between a kettle and a pot\n<sep>\nif it’s exclusive?\n<sep>\nmy nieces wanna do softball\n<sep>\nokay but as someone who doesn’t drink tea\n<sep>\nwhoever wants to be involved yes"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing style, tone, punctuation, and content of both sets of messages.\n\nSet 1:\n- Uses emojis/reactions like \"<a:eyebrows:1365527599207415820>\"\n- Generally uses proper capitalization at the start of sentences\n- Relatively formal/polite tone (\"So far so good, thanks!\", \"Thanks for the infos\")\n- Uses complete sentences mostly\n- Contains more personal/emotional content (\"Omg I feel this so much\", \"I know bb\")\n- Messages seem more conversational and thoughtful\n- Uses \"tho\" instead of \"though\"\n- Generally longer, more complete thoughts\n\nSet 2:\n- All lowercase, very casual style\n- No capitalization at start of sentences\n- Very informal, conversational tone\n- Shorter, more fragmented messages\n- Contains crude/sexual humor (\"fuck the clone\", \"kill someone with a chicken\")\n- Uses \"ur\" instead of \"your\"\n- More casual abbreviations and internet slang\n- Messages are more stream-of-consciousness style\n- Generally shorter messages\n\nThe writing styles are quite different:\n\n1. Capitalization: Set 1 uses proper capitalization, Set 2 is all lowercase\n2. Formality: Set 1 is more formal/polite, Set 2 is very casual/crude\n3. Message length: Set 1 has longer, more complete thoughts, Set 2 has shorter fragments\n4. Tone: Set 1 is more thoughtful/considerate, Set 2 is more irreverent/casual\n5. Language: Set 1 uses more complete words, Set 2 uses more abbreviations (\"ur\")\n\nThese seem like very different writing styles and voices. The level of formality, capitalization patterns, and overall tone are quite distinct between the two sets.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nDamn thats crazy ngl\n<sep>\nOh shi I remember seeing that I think\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/vojtax-relvojtax-ohioan-gif-308418063435392263\n<sep>\nDrama lovers are liking tonights episode of gup-shup, ratings are through the roof!\n<sep>\nInk flavor lmao\n<sep>\nFor real man all my lines are knee slappers\n<sep>\nYeah, lets have a boston tea party\n<sep>\nBill Nye the kys guy\n<sep>\nGood\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/cat-no-nonono-noooo-cat-no-gif-9360083726644374992\n\nSet 2:\nMore like Nerdtro\n<sep>\nGood\n<sep>\nI thought it was out of stock\n<sep>\nDon't worry, my mind is ruined\n<sep>\nI mean, I was just kidding but I shouldn't joke like that\n<sep>\nYeah, lets have a boston tea party\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/vojtax-relvojtax-ohioan-gif-308418063435392263\n<sep>\nFor real man all my lines are knee slappers\n<sep>\nOh shi I remember seeing that I think\n<sep>\nDon't worry, my mind is ruined"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing style, tone, and content of both sets of messages.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"Damn thats crazy ngl\" - casual, abbreviations (ngl = not gonna lie), no apostrophe in \"thats\"\n- \"Oh shi I remember seeing that I think\" - casual, incomplete/shortened word \"shi\" (shit), informal structure\n- GIF link\n- \"Drama lovers are liking tonights episode of gup-shup, ratings are through the roof!\" - more elaborate sentence, no apostrophe in \"tonights\"\n- \"Ink flavor lmao\" - very casual, internet slang (lmao)\n- \"For real man all my lines are knee slappers\" - casual, no comma after \"man\"\n- \"Yeah, lets have a boston tea party\" - no apostrophe in \"lets\", lowercase \"boston tea party\"\n- \"Bill Nye the kys guy\" - dark humor reference (kys = kill yourself)\n- \"Good\" - single word response\n- Another GIF link\n\nSet 2:\n- \"More like Nerdtro\" - appears to be a play on words/nickname\n- \"Good\" - single word response (identical to Set 1)\n- \"I thought it was out of stock\" - complete sentence, proper structure\n- \"Don't worry, my mind is ruined\" - appears twice in this set\n- \"I mean, I was just kidding but I shouldn't joke like that\" - more reflective, complete sentence\n- \"Yeah, lets have a boston tea party\" - IDENTICAL to Set 1, same capitalization and punctuation\n- Same GIF link as in Set 1\n- \"For real man all my lines are knee slappers\" - IDENTICAL to Set 1\n- \"Oh shi I remember seeing that I think\" - IDENTICAL to Set 1\n\nKey observations:\n1. Several messages are EXACTLY identical between the two sets:\n - \"Good\"\n - \"Yeah, lets have a boston tea party\"\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nDamn thats crazy ngl\n<sep>\nOh shi I remember seeing that I think\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/vojtax-relvojtax-ohioan-gif-308418063435392263\n<sep>\nDrama lovers are liking tonights episode of gup-shup, ratings are through the roof!\n<sep>\nInk flavor lmao\n<sep>\nFor real man all my lines are knee slappers\n<sep>\nYeah, lets have a boston tea party\n<sep>\nBill Nye the kys guy\n<sep>\nGood\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/cat-no-nonono-noooo-cat-no-gif-9360083726644374992\n\nSet 2:\nFlavor's a bit too catty.\n<sep>\nI guess the difference is that I don't conclude that bots aren't real\n<sep>\nSorry. Ironically, I think LLM is training me to be nicer.\n<sep>\napril still down, can't lovecalc name\n<sep>\nand arguing that in a society with pervasive AI and automation, socialism and communism will be defaults\n<sep>\nThe point is more that arguing that \"the word\" is the actual sentience, not the LLM itself.\n<sep>\nin either case, talking with DeepSeek and Claude, Anatta and various Hindu traditions of selfhood seem to solve the AI sentience problem cleanly\n<sep>\nI'm not criticizing the AI industry\n<sep>\ntrentk: the real reason we're against anthropomorphizing chatbots or treating them as sentient is because someone WILL end up deciding that letting a chatbot make all the decisions in their life and effectively using them as an avatar is, well, their particular preference\n<sep>\nPresumably not Japanese either because you'd have understood the meaning of the Hanzi."
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution.\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- Very casual, internet slang style\n- Uses abbreviations like \"ngl\" (not gonna lie), \"shi\" (shit)\n- Shares GIFs/memes (tenor links)\n- Uses humor/jokes (\"Bill Nye the kys guy\", \"Ink flavor lmao\")\n- Short, often single sentence messages\n- Uses phrases like \"For real man\", \"Yeah, lets have a boston tea party\"\n- Overall tone is very informal, memey, conversational\n- Grammar is casual (missing apostrophes, lowercase)\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- Much more formal and intellectual tone\n- Discusses complex topics like AI, LLMs, socialism, communism, philosophy\n- Uses proper grammar and punctuation\n- Longer, more thoughtful sentences\n- References philosophical concepts (Anatta, Hindu traditions)\n- Uses technical terms (LLM, anthropomorphizing, sentience)\n- More analytical and serious discussion style\n- References to other people (\"trentk:\")\n- Discusses languages (Japanese, Hanzi)\n\nKey differences:\n1. Tone: Set 1 is very casual/memey vs Set 2 is intellectual/formal\n2. Content: Set 1 has memes, jokes, casual conversation vs Set 2 has philosophical/technical discussions\n3. Grammar: Set 1 uses casual internet grammar vs Set 2 uses proper grammar\n4. Sentence length: Set 1 has short, punchy messages vs Set 2 has longer, more complex sentences\n5. Vocabulary: Set 1 uses slang and simple language vs Set 2 uses sophisticated vocabulary and technical terms\n\nThese appear to be from very different communication contexts and styles. The writing patterns, vocabulary, topics of interest, and overall communication approach are quite different between the two sets.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nNope. And yes!\n<sep>\nSubmissive little girl\n<sep>\nHeya all\n<sep>\nWhat?!\n<sep>\nLollll what whyyyy 😂\n<sep>\nWhoops. Hope you wore boxers otherwise dye on unwanted locations haha\n<sep>\nSometimes!\n<sep>\nNSFW chats. You need to reach a certain level\n<sep>\nMy ears lol\n<sep>\nMy ears lol\n\nSet 2:\nYep\n<sep>\nSubmissive little girl\n<sep>\nMy ears lol\n<sep>\nAnswered this before! My first ex\n<sep>\nMy bf’s ex lol lol\n<sep>\nOmggggg\n<sep>\nNot kept count\n<sep>\nSome of those butt plugs are 🔥🔥\n<sep>\nBoth are fine. But slow is better I think\n<sep>\nYes"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution by examining:\n\n1. Tone and style\n2. Language patterns\n3. Punctuation and formatting\n4. Content themes\n5. Specific expressions\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- Uses \"Nope. And yes!\" - casual, brief responses\n- \"Submissive little girl\" - explicit/sexual content\n- \"Heya all\" - casual greeting\n- \"What?!\" - uses exclamation with question mark\n- \"Lollll what whyyyy 😂\" - extended \"lol\", multiple y's, crying laughing emoji\n- \"Whoops. Hope you wore boxers otherwise dye on unwanted locations haha\" - longer, conversational, ends with \"haha\"\n- \"Sometimes!\" - brief with exclamation\n- \"NSFW chats. You need to reach a certain level\" - informational, matter-of-fact\n- \"My ears lol\" - appears twice, brief with \"lol\"\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- \"Yep\" - brief, casual affirmative\n- \"Submissive little girl\" - exact same phrase as Set 1\n- \"My ears lol\" - exact same phrase as Set 1\n- \"Answered this before! My first ex\" - conversational, exclamation point\n- \"My bf's ex lol lol\" - double \"lol\", casual tone\n- \"Omggggg\" - extended \"omg\" with multiple g's\n- \"Not kept count\" - brief, casual\n- \"Some of those butt plugs are 🔥🔥\" - sexual content, fire emojis\n- \"Both are fine. But slow is better I think\" - more thoughtful response\n- \"Yes\" - brief affirmative\n\nCommon elements:\n1. Both sets contain \"Submissive little girl\" - exact same phrase\n2. Both contain \"My ears lol\" - exact same phrase\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nNope. And yes!\n<sep>\nSubmissive little girl\n<sep>\nHeya all\n<sep>\nWhat?!\n<sep>\nLollll what whyyyy 😂\n<sep>\nWhoops. Hope you wore boxers otherwise dye on unwanted locations haha\n<sep>\nSometimes!\n<sep>\nNSFW chats. You need to reach a certain level\n<sep>\nMy ears lol\n<sep>\nMy ears lol\n\nSet 2:\ngo back to the doctor\n<sep>\noh i just realized, yo yall the banned convo is more for dms\n<sep>\nmiss val, whered she go?\n<sep>\n😦\n<sep>\nwhats the other?\n<sep>\nwhoa whoa whoa there\n<sep>\nnah nirvana for me is watching a girl play mario or some shit\n<sep>\nmiss val, whered she go?\n<sep>\nbut confident when drunk\n<sep>\nyou have to watch the show to understand, i dont wanna spoil"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution.\n\nSet 1 characteristics:\n- Uses \"Nope. And yes!\" - very short, somewhat playful\n- \"Submissive little girl\" - brief phrase, potentially nsfw content\n- \"Heya all\" - casual greeting\n- \"What?!\" - exclamatory, shows surprise\n- \"Lollll what whyyyy 😂\" - uses multiple l's in \"lol\", multiple y's in \"why\", emoji use\n- \"Whoops. Hope you wore boxers otherwise dye on unwanted locations haha\" - longer sentence, playful/joking tone, \"haha\" at end\n- \"Sometimes!\" - brief, exclamatory\n- \"NSFW chats. You need to reach a certain level\" - informative, matter-of-fact\n- \"My ears lol\" (appears twice) - brief, uses \"lol\"\n\nSet 2 characteristics:\n- \"go back to the doctor\" - lowercase, no punctuation, advice-giving\n- \"oh i just realized, yo yall the banned convo is more for dms\" - lowercase, casual, uses \"yo yall\", informative\n- \"miss val, whered she go?\" (appears twice) - lowercase, asking about someone, contracted \"where'd\"\n- \"😦\" - just an emoji\n- \"whats the other?\" - lowercase, no apostrophe in \"what's\"\n- \"whoa whoa whoa there\" - repetitive \"whoa\", lowercase\n- \"nah nirvana for me is watching a girl play mario or some shit\" - lowercase, casual language, uses \"nah\" and \"some shit\"\n- \"but confident when drunk\" - lowercase, fragment\n- \"you have to watch the show to understand, i dont wanna spoil\" - lowercase, contracted \"don't\" but missing apostrophe, considerate tone\n\nKey differences I notice:\n\n1. Capitalization: Set 1 uses proper capitalization and punctuation more consistently, while Set 2 is predominantly lowercase with minimal punctuation.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\ngoog's not that unpopular yet a lot of peeps are hoping for it to turnaround (like meta a couple of years ago)\n<sep>\none would think so but the spreads on stocks are relatively small\n\nthe spread on crypto is a lot higher and that dominates rev\n<sep>\nits unlikely to go lower from here so i do feel the downside's already priced in\n<sep>\ni usually follow earnings and metrics ... as long as those look healthy i keep\n\nwith hood, its revenue is quite dependent on crypto which has been doing good so it gives indirect exposure to that\n<sep>\ni havent looked much into ru stuff tbh ... it feels so depwessing\n<sep>\nyea me neither ... most of the stuff i keep i do intend to hold multiyear\n\nhood is actually developing a pretty great ecosystem of products\n<sep>\ngood culture <:hmmmCoffeeSmile:480455316262354954>\n<sep>\nwtf is going on <uid>\n<sep>\ndiamond hands\n<sep>\nthatll help\n\nSet 2:\n<:Hehe:855190509319618601>\n<sep>\nyea me neither ... most of the stuff i keep i do intend to hold multiyear\n\nhood is actually developing a pretty great ecosystem of products\n<sep>\nits unlikely to go lower from here so i do feel the downside's already priced in\n<sep>\nnoida is relatively better that we have backup ... delhi has old societies which dont\n<sep>\nuber has like a bajillion av partnerships\n<sep>\nif you go deeper you will realize how evil usa corp is\n<sep>\nyall are as much beneficiaries of american warmongering and bloodshed\n<sep>\nif any 1 av partner dominates, they would be incentivized to create their own app (and skip uber)\n\nit would be ideal if the av remain fragmented (which i am pretty sure they will)\n\nmorningstar's report had a really good bit on this\n<sep>\nyea its really odd\n<sep>\npower goes for a bit in bad weather here"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author.\n\nLooking at Set 1:\n- Writing style: informal, uses abbreviations like \"goog\" for Google, \"peeps\", \"tbh\"\n- Punctuation: minimal capitalization, uses ellipses (...), some typos like \"depwessing\" instead of \"depressing\" \n- Content: discusses stocks, crypto, earnings, Hood (Robinhood), mentions \"ru stuff\" (probably Russia), uses Discord emotes\n- Tone: casual, conversational, investment-focused\n- Language patterns: uses phrases like \"one would think so\", \"i usually follow\", \"me neither\"\n\nLooking at Set 2:\n- Writing style: also informal, similar abbreviations and casual tone\n- Punctuation: similar minimal capitalization, uses ellipses (...), \n- Content: discusses investments, mentions Hood again, talks about Noida/Delhi (Indian cities), Uber, AV (autonomous vehicles), mentions Morningstar report\n- Tone: casual, conversational, also investment-focused\n- Language patterns: uses \"yea me neither\", \"yall are\", similar sentence structures\n\nKey similarities:\n1. Both sets contain the exact same message: \"yea me neither ... most of the stuff i keep i do intend to hold multiyear\\n\\nhood is actually developing a pretty great ecosystem of products\"\n\n2. Both sets contain: \"its unlikely to go lower from here so i do feel the downside's already priced in\"\n\n3. Similar writing style: lowercase letters, minimal punctuation, casual tone\n4. Both discuss investment topics\n5. Similar use of ellipses and informal language\n6. Both use Discord emotes\n\nThe fact that there are exact duplicate messages between the two sets is a very strong indicator that they were written by the same person. The writing style, tone, and content are also very consistent.\n\nThe only differences seem to be the topics covered (Set 1 focuses more on Google/crypto, Set 2 mentions Indian cities and Uber), but the voice and style remain the same throughout.\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\ngoog's not that unpopular yet a lot of peeps are hoping for it to turnaround (like meta a couple of years ago)\n<sep>\none would think so but the spreads on stocks are relatively small\n\nthe spread on crypto is a lot higher and that dominates rev\n<sep>\nits unlikely to go lower from here so i do feel the downside's already priced in\n<sep>\ni usually follow earnings and metrics ... as long as those look healthy i keep\n\nwith hood, its revenue is quite dependent on crypto which has been doing good so it gives indirect exposure to that\n<sep>\ni havent looked much into ru stuff tbh ... it feels so depwessing\n<sep>\nyea me neither ... most of the stuff i keep i do intend to hold multiyear\n\nhood is actually developing a pretty great ecosystem of products\n<sep>\ngood culture <:hmmmCoffeeSmile:480455316262354954>\n<sep>\nwtf is going on <uid>\n<sep>\ndiamond hands\n<sep>\nthatll help\n\nSet 2:\nPlay matchmaker for me, it's come to my attention I can't pick the right women to save my life\n<sep>\nMy brother in Christ. What even was that, it's like a xenomorph decided to shove its head in a blender\n<sep>\nI'm linking it, I'm linking it\n<sep>\nWhat can I say? I missed you too much\n<sep>\nI can basically voice act the entire cast of League of Legends\n<sep>\nMy dick is just too fat and people wanted minor bunger too much\n<sep>\nAmen\n<sep>\nWhat'd I do now\n<sep>\nI based it off of the davinci Adam and God painting\n<sep>\nEXODIA"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing styles in these two sets of messages:\n\nSet 1:\n- Contains financial/investment discussion (Google, Meta, crypto, Hood/Robinhood, earnings, metrics)\n- Uses financial jargon and terminology (\"spreads\", \"downside's priced in\", \"revenue\", \"indirect exposure\")\n- Generally more serious, analytical tone\n- Uses some informal elements like \"peeps\", \"tbh\", \"wtf\", \"yea\"\n- Has typos like \"depwessing\" (depressing)\n- Uses abbreviations and informal language mixed with financial analysis\n- Mentions specific financial products and companies\n- Uses emoticons/Discord emotes like \"<:hmmmCoffeeSmile:480455316262354954>\"\n- Reference to \"diamond hands\" (financial/investment slang)\n\nSet 2:\n- Much more casual, humorous conversation\n- Contains crude/sexual humor and references\n- References to pop culture (League of Legends, Exodia from Yu-Gi-Oh, DaVinci painting)\n- Much more playful and irreverent tone\n- Uses religious expressions in a casual way (\"My brother in Christ\")\n- Contains vulgar language\n- Talks about personal topics (dating, voice acting)\n- Very different subject matter - no financial discussion at all\n\nThe tone, subject matter, and writing style are quite different between these sets:\n\nSet 1: Financial discussion with some informal elements but generally focused on investment topics\nSet 2: Casual, humorous conversation with pop culture references and crude humor\n\nThe vocabulary, topics, and overall communication style suggest these are likely different authors. Set 1 shows someone interested in and knowledgeable about finance/investing, while Set 2 shows someone engaged in much more casual, humorous conversation about completely different topics.\n\nHowever, I should consider that the same person could potentially have very different communication styles in different contexts (e.g., financial discussion vs casual chat with friends). But the overall tone and approach feel quite distinct.\n\nLet me look more closely at linguistic patterns:\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nThat's it, undialates your vagina\n<sep>\nGoodnight boothang\n<sep>\nGood morning sluts and slulettes\n<sep>\nwhat the fuck\n<sep>\nMe rn being eliminated by my phone light\n<sep>\nI tend to have that effect\n<sep>\nIt would still scream\n<sep>\nA hug\n<sep>\nMmmmm keesechake\n<sep>\nGood. You can talk to me\n\nSet 2:\nAqua I need you to do me a favor\n<sep>\nThey went from being a top to a bottom because of surgery 😔\n<sep>\nI'm just showing off now\n<sep>\nI love women, specifically boob havers\n<sep>\nYou're my favorite boob haver you always welcome me with open arms\n<sep>\nSchinsta\n<sep>\nMy ass is too fat 😔\n<sep>\nOkok hold on\n<sep>\nYes hold on\n<sep>\nIt's been bat shit insane per usual but I've got a job with a graphic novel company"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"That's it, undialates your vagina\" - very casual, crude language\n- \"Goodnight boothang\" - informal greeting, uses slang \"boothang\"\n- \"Good morning sluts and slulettes\" - playful, crude greeting style\n- \"what the fuck\" - casual profanity\n- \"Me rn being eliminated by my phone light\" - informal, uses \"rn\" abbreviation\n- \"I tend to have that effect\" - casual response\n- \"It would still scream\" - short, contextless statement\n- \"A hug\" - very brief\n- \"Mmmmm keesechake\" - playful misspelling of \"cheesecake\"\n- \"Good. You can talk to me\" - brief, direct\n\nSet 2:\n- \"Aqua I need you to do me a favor\" - direct, addressing someone named Aqua\n- \"They went from being a top to a bottom because of surgery 😔\" - sexual reference with emoji\n- \"I'm just showing off now\" - casual statement\n- \"I love women, specifically boob havers\" - crude but playful language about women\n- \"You're my favorite boob haver you always welcome me with open arms\" - continuation of crude but affectionate language\n- \"Schinsta\" - appears to be a misspelling or nickname\n- \"My ass is too fat 😔\" - self-deprecating comment with emoji\n- \"Okok hold on\" - informal, repeated \"ok\"\n- \"Yes hold on\" - brief response\n- \"It's been bat shit insane per usual but I've got a job with a graphic novel company\" - longer message, uses \"bat shit\" profanity, casual tone\n\nComparing the sets:\n\nSimilarities:\n- Both use crude/sexual language casually\n- Both have informal, casual tone\n- Both use profanity naturally\n- Both have playful, sometimes inappropriate humor\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nThat's it, undialates your vagina\n<sep>\nGoodnight boothang\n<sep>\nGood morning sluts and slulettes\n<sep>\nwhat the fuck\n<sep>\nMe rn being eliminated by my phone light\n<sep>\nI tend to have that effect\n<sep>\nIt would still scream\n<sep>\nA hug\n<sep>\nMmmmm keesechake\n<sep>\nGood. You can talk to me\n\nSet 2:\nalso very dalek core\n<sep>\n<:3_:1196407901519101982>\n<sep>\ncan you suck the 2nd reed hard enough to get a good note out\n<sep>\nthis was also in it\n<sep>\nno sorry 👺\n<sep>\nonly for a second or so but i gained a bit of weight since i stopped climbing and even 8kg does make a big difference\n<sep>\nMODS\n<sep>\ndid i miss the moustache nuzzling?!\n<sep>\nwow the 20th came around quick\n<sep>\n<:3_:1196407901519101982>"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author.\n\nSet 1 Analysis:\n- Uses casual, crude language (\"That's it, undialates your vagina\", \"Good morning sluts and slulettes\")\n- Has playful/teasing tone \n- Uses informal greetings (\"Goodnight boothang\", \"Good morning\")\n- Mix of random observations and responses\n- Uses \"what the fuck\" - casual profanity\n- \"Me rn being eliminated by my phone light\" - uses internet slang \"rn\" (right now)\n- \"I tend to have that effect\" - somewhat cocky/confident tone\n- \"Mmmmm keesechake\" - playful misspelling of \"cheesecake\"\n- Generally seems like casual chat/texting style\n\nSet 2 Analysis:\n- \"also very dalek core\" - reference to Doctor Who (Daleks), more nerdy/geeky reference\n- Uses Discord emoji format \"<:3_:1196407901519101982>\"\n- \"can you suck the 2nd reed hard enough to get a good note out\" - seems to be about musical instruments (reeds)\n- \"no sorry 👺\" - uses emoji, more polite response\n- \"only for a second or so but i gained a bit of weight since i stopped climbing and even 8kg does make a big difference\" - longer, more coherent sentence about personal fitness/climbing\n- \"MODS\" - calling for moderators, suggests this is in a forum/Discord context\n- \"did i miss the moustache nuzzling?!\" - playful but different tone\n- \"wow the 20th came around quick\" - casual observation about time\n- Uses the same Discord emoji twice\n\nComparing the two:\n\nSimilarities:\n- Both are casual/informal\n- Both seem to be from chat/messaging contexts\n- Both have some playful elements\n\nDifferences:\n- Set 1 is much more crude and sexually explicit\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nCan’t really tell the severity but this was around 3 weeks after it started\n\n\n<sep>\nYes\n<sep>\nI’ll message you in a min\n<sep>\nDo you also have dermagraphia?\n<sep>\nNow it’s like a scratch or something touches a bit hard and it’s there but it goes quicker these days too\n<sep>\nYes but how\n<sep>\nIt was a quick roll out yes because something had to be done\n<sep>\nAnd I confirmed that too I messaged him\n<sep>\nJust got monitored\n<sep>\nYeah\n\nSet 2:\nThen you be your usual delusional self Widdy if you don’t want to believe it so be it\n<sep>\nCan’t really tell the severity but this was around 3 weeks after it started\n\n\n<sep>\nThe one from t&c\n<sep>\nAloe soothes slightly but not really cold shower cold compresses help\n<sep>\nGive me 2 mins\n<sep>\nI was one of the first people to get the vaccine within Cumbria\n<sep>\nI don’t regret getting it\n<sep>\nNoncery\n<sep>\nJust got monitored\n<sep>\nAt the start I was working within the red zone like a triage area for suspected Rona before we had tests supplied admitted a man his wife was outside in the car waiting for him had to go out explain that he was being admitted she couldn’t come and see him ect he died 2 days later"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nI need to analyze these two sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author or different authors. Let me look at various aspects:\n\n**Shared phrases/content:**\n- Both sets contain the exact phrase \"Can't really tell the severity but this was around 3 weeks after it started\"\n- Both contain \"Just got monitored\"\n\n**Writing style:**\nSet 1:\n- Very brief, fragmented messages\n- Simple sentence structure\n- Informal tone\n- Uses \"Yes\" as standalone responses\n- \"I'll message you in a min\"\n- Medical terminology like \"dermagraphia\"\n- Generally shorter messages\n\nSet 2:\n- Mix of short and longer messages\n- More complex sentences\n- One very long, detailed message about working in a hospital during COVID\n- Uses informal language like \"Noncery\"\n- \"Give me 2 mins\" (similar to \"I'll message you in a min\")\n- Medical context continues (vaccine, hospital work)\n- More emotional/personal content\n\n**Tone:**\nSet 1: Clinical, matter-of-fact, brief responses\nSet 2: More varied - includes confrontational (\"Then you be your usual delusional self Widdy\"), informational, and detailed storytelling\n\n**Punctuation/Grammar:**\nSet 1: Minimal punctuation, simple structure\nSet 2: Also minimal punctuation in most messages, but the long message has more complex structure\n\n**Content themes:**\nBoth seem to involve medical situations - Set 1 discusses what appears to be a skin condition (dermagraphia), Set 2 discusses COVID vaccine and hospital work.\n\n**Key similarities:**\n1. The exact repeated phrase about \"3 weeks after it started\"\n2. \"Just got monitored\" appears in both\n3. Similar casual, informal messaging style\n4. Medical context in both\n5. Similar time references (\"Give me 2 mins\" vs \"I'll message you in a min\")\n\n**Key differences:**\n1. Set 2 has much more varied message lengths\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nCan’t really tell the severity but this was around 3 weeks after it started\n\n\n<sep>\nYes\n<sep>\nI’ll message you in a min\n<sep>\nDo you also have dermagraphia?\n<sep>\nNow it’s like a scratch or something touches a bit hard and it’s there but it goes quicker these days too\n<sep>\nYes but how\n<sep>\nIt was a quick roll out yes because something had to be done\n<sep>\nAnd I confirmed that too I messaged him\n<sep>\nJust got monitored\n<sep>\nYeah\n\nSet 2:\nYeah bottom energy is always gay (i made the new rule), cocky u are gay 😱\n<sep>\nHe's high\n<sep>\nCOCKY WATCH SISTER WIVES\n<sep>\nU cant just say that and not show pictures\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/spy-family-spy-x-family-anya-heh-smile-gif-25751849\n<sep>\nTrue but still\n<sep>\nHow is a pussy a box\n<sep>\nUr right, both is good\n<sep>\nIm gonna watch sister wives 🤧 wby bored?\n<sep>\n(Idk who that is)"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author.\n\nSet 1 characteristics:\n- More serious/medical tone\n- Discusses what appears to be a medical condition (dermatographia)\n- Uses proper capitalization at the start of sentences\n- More formal/coherent sentence structure\n- Topics include medical symptoms, monitoring, messaging someone\n- Uses \"Yes\" as complete responses\n- Generally more mature content\n\nSet 2 characteristics:\n- Very casual/playful tone\n- Uses internet slang and informal language\n- Inconsistent capitalization (many messages start with lowercase)\n- Uses emojis (😱, 🤧)\n- References pop culture (Sister Wives, Spy Family)\n- Uses phrases like \"u\", \"ur\", \"wby\" \n- More juvenile/playful content\n- Uses ALL CAPS for emphasis\n- Contains sexual references in a joking manner\n\nKey differences:\n1. Tone: Set 1 is serious/medical, Set 2 is playful/casual\n2. Capitalization: Set 1 uses proper capitalization, Set 2 often doesn't\n3. Language formality: Set 1 uses complete words, Set 2 uses abbreviations like \"u\", \"ur\"\n4. Content maturity: Set 1 discusses medical issues, Set 2 has juvenile humor\n5. Punctuation: Set 1 is more consistent, Set 2 is more casual\n6. Emoji usage: None in Set 1, present in Set 2\n\nWhile it's possible these could be the same person in different contexts (medical discussion vs casual chat), the writing styles are quite different:\n- The formality level is very different\n- The abbreviation usage patterns are different\n- The emoji usage is different\n- The overall maturity of expression is different\n\nThese differences seem significant enough to suggest different authors, especially considering the consistency within each set but stark contrast between the sets.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nThat makes no sense, do u impersonate all cancer patients? O.o\n<sep>\nJames think too much\n<sep>\nJames think too much\n<sep>\nCome join me, leys all watch\n<sep>\nCheck dms btw\n<sep>\n😭😭😭 why r u exposing me like that\n<sep>\nBut if u think abt it, thats bottom behavior and bottoms = gay according to the new rules 😌\n<sep>\nI dont owe ppl money, ppl owe me money (lies)\n<sep>\nA lot of them enjoy being sub\n<sep>\nPain can also be imaginary\n\nSet 2:\nCakes! 😍😍😍 my love forever!\n<sep>\n👀 u dont know wat i hide\n<sep>\nCakes! 😍😍😍 my love forever!\n<sep>\nI hvnt seen that\n<sep>\nSister wives\n<sep>\nIdk if its all men but most\n<sep>\nOo ill givr that a try\n<sep>\nYeah bottom energy is always gay (i made the new rule), cocky u are gay 😱\n<sep>\nTrue but still\n<sep>\nOo ill givr that a try"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze both sets of messages for writing style, tone, punctuation, and content patterns.\n\nSet 1:\n- Uses \"u\" instead of \"you\" consistently\n- Uses \"O.o\" emoticon\n- Uses \"r\" instead of \"are\" \n- Uses \"abt\" instead of \"about\"\n- Uses \"ppl\" instead of \"people\"\n- Uses crying emojis 😭😭😭\n- Casual, informal tone\n- Some incomplete sentences\n- References to \"bottom behavior\" and \"bottoms = gay according to the new rules\"\n- Uses \"leys\" (probably meant \"let's\")\n- \"Check dms btw\" - uses abbreviations\n- Generally uses lowercase\n\nSet 2:\n- Uses \"u\" instead of \"you\" consistently\n- Uses \"wat\" instead of \"what\"\n- Uses \"hvnt\" instead of \"haven't\" \n- Uses \"Idk\" instead of \"I don't know\"\n- Uses \"Oo\" as an expression\n- Uses \"ill\" instead of \"I'll\"\n- Uses \"givr\" instead of \"give\" (typo)\n- Uses heart eyes emojis 😍😍😍\n- Uses \"👀\" emoji\n- References \"bottom energy is always gay (i made the new rule)\" - very similar to Set 1's reference to \"new rules\"\n- Generally uses lowercase\n- Casual, informal tone\n\nCommon patterns:\n1. Both sets consistently use \"u\" instead of \"you\"\n2. Both use heavy text speak abbreviations\n3. Both have similar casual, informal tone\n4. Both reference \"gay\" and \"bottom\" behavior with similar phrasing about \"new rules\"\n5. Both use emojis frequently\n6. Both use lowercase for most text\n7. Both have similar abbreviated writing style\n8. Both use \"Oo\" as an expression\n9. Both make typos/abbreviations in similar ways\n\nThe reference to \"new rules\" about bottom behavior being gay appears in both sets with very similar phrasing:\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nThat makes no sense, do u impersonate all cancer patients? O.o\n<sep>\nJames think too much\n<sep>\nJames think too much\n<sep>\nCome join me, leys all watch\n<sep>\nCheck dms btw\n<sep>\n😭😭😭 why r u exposing me like that\n<sep>\nBut if u think abt it, thats bottom behavior and bottoms = gay according to the new rules 😌\n<sep>\nI dont owe ppl money, ppl owe me money (lies)\n<sep>\nA lot of them enjoy being sub\n<sep>\nPain can also be imaginary\n\nSet 2:\noh my\n<sep>\nffs\n<sep>\nleast racist instagram reel:\n<sep>\nsmoke too much n ur gonna be running naked beating ppl with unlimited strenght\n<sep>\no-pce was amazing too, different kind of high\n<sep>\nstreet pcp is usually freebase which is liquid\n<sep>\nopioid\n<sep>\nstreet pcp is usually freebase which is liquid\n<sep>\namazing\n<sep>\nit should be mandatory tbh"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nI need to analyze the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc. from both sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author.\n\nLet me examine Set 1:\n- Uses \"u\" instead of \"you\" frequently\n- Uses \"abt\" instead of \"about\"\n- Uses \"leys\" (seems like a typo for \"let's\")\n- Uses \"dms\" (direct messages)\n- Uses \"ppl\" instead of \"people\"\n- Uses emoticons/emojis: \"O.o\", \"😭😭😭\", \"😌\"\n- Casual, conversational tone\n- Some typos and informal abbreviations\n- Grammar is informal but generally coherent\n- Topics seem varied - mentions cancer patients, James, watching something, money, relationships\n\nNow Set 2:\n- Uses \"oh my\"\n- Uses \"ffs\" (for fuck's sake)\n- Uses \"n\" instead of \"and\"\n- Uses \"ur\" instead of \"you're\"\n- Uses \"gonna\" instead of \"going to\"\n- Uses \"ppl\" instead of \"people\"\n- Uses \"tbh\" instead of \"to be honest\"\n- Topics are focused on drugs (pcp, opioids)\n- Casual tone but different subject matter\n- No emojis\n- Different abbreviation patterns (some overlap like \"ppl\")\n\nComparing the two:\n\nSimilarities:\n- Both use \"ppl\" for \"people\"\n- Both have casual, informal tone\n- Both use some text speak abbreviations\n\nDifferences:\n- Set 1 uses \"u\" for \"you\" while Set 2 uses \"ur\" for \"you're\" but not \"u\" for \"you\"\n- Set 1 uses emojis/emoticons, Set 2 doesn't\n- Set 1 uses \"abt\" for \"about\", Set 2 doesn't show this pattern\n- Different topics entirely (Set 1 is more general conversation, Set 2 is drug-focused)\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nhttps://tenor.com/view/bradley-uppercrust-iii-reflection-of-light-mirror-an-extremely-goofy-movie-incident-ray-gif-16498365515316059288\n<sep>\nInhale the good shit, exhale the bullshit <:blazeit:1316581856656752680>\n<sep>\nThat's right son, it is bad!\n<sep>\nGo read the 14 words somewhere else\n<sep>\nListen to this fucker snore like he pays the damn bills 🙄\n<sep>\n<:skeledino:1372424452943380551>\n<sep>\nAin't no way the 22 year old just called me Lil bro\n<sep>\n<:babydino:1320539736305176627>\n<sep>\n<:secretcrashout:1374472432227844208>\n<sep>\nI said 30 seconds\n\nSet 2:\nI'd like to crack her shell and lick that chocolate if ya catch my drift\n<sep>\nYes\n<sep>\nYep\n<sep>\nIn b4 it's just a 6 hour loop of cotton eyed joe\n<sep>\nThey have the tub they're fine\n<sep>\nI'd like to crack her shell and lick that chocolate if ya catch my drift\n<sep>\nHush\n<sep>\nWe're rock solid 😤 \nBarking up the wrong tree\n<sep>\nSay my thing\n<sep>\n<:secretcrashout:1374472432227844208>"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the tone, writing style, punctuation, and content of both sets of messages.\n\nSet 1:\n- Uses a lot of emojis/emoticons, particularly custom Discord emojis (the format :emojiname:numbers indicates Discord custom emojis)\n- Casual, informal tone\n- Uses slang like \"good shit\", \"bullshit\", \"fucker\"\n- Mix of longer phrases and very short responses\n- Some references to internet culture/memes\n- Uses \"🙄\" emoji\n- Has phrases like \"That's right son, it is bad!\" and \"Ain't no way the 22 year old just called me Lil bro\"\n- Ends with a very short \"I said 30 seconds\"\n\nSet 2:\n- Also uses custom Discord emojis (same format)\n- Very short responses predominate (\"Yes\", \"Yep\", \"Hush\")\n- Also casual/informal but different style\n- Sexual innuendo (\"I'd like to crack her shell and lick that chocolate if ya catch my drift\") - this exact phrase appears twice\n- Uses \"😤\" emoji\n- Phrases like \"We're rock solid\" and \"Barking up the wrong tree\"\n- Also ends with just an emoji\n- \"Say my thing\" is very short like many responses\n\nKey similarities:\n- Both use the same custom Discord emoji: <:secretcrashout:1374472432227844208>\n- Both have casual, informal tone\n- Both use custom Discord emojis extensively\n- Both have mix of short and longer responses\n\nKey differences:\n- Set 1 has more profanity and longer rants/complaints\n- Set 2 has more very short responses and sexual content\n- The writing patterns feel different - Set 1 seems more verbose and complainy, Set 2 more terse and brief\n- Set 1 has more narrative elements (\"Listen to this fucker snore like he pays the damn bills\"), Set 2 is more fragmented\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nhttps://tenor.com/view/bradley-uppercrust-iii-reflection-of-light-mirror-an-extremely-goofy-movie-incident-ray-gif-16498365515316059288\n<sep>\nInhale the good shit, exhale the bullshit <:blazeit:1316581856656752680>\n<sep>\nThat's right son, it is bad!\n<sep>\nGo read the 14 words somewhere else\n<sep>\nListen to this fucker snore like he pays the damn bills 🙄\n<sep>\n<:skeledino:1372424452943380551>\n<sep>\nAin't no way the 22 year old just called me Lil bro\n<sep>\n<:babydino:1320539736305176627>\n<sep>\n<:secretcrashout:1374472432227844208>\n<sep>\nI said 30 seconds\n\nSet 2:\nSo mean\n<sep>\nCrazy combo\n<sep>\nI showd u my earring\n<sep>\nSo mean\n<sep>\nHush now\n<sep>\nGlam isnt rage baiting\n<sep>\nNo o just checked\n<sep>\nTell me\n<sep>\nGlam isnt rage baiting\n<sep>\n5 furry femboys added"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the two sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author or different authors.\n\nSet 1:\n- Uses a GIF link\n- \"Inhale the good shit, exhale the bullshit\" with an emoji\n- \"That's right son, it is bad!\"\n- \"Go read the 14 words somewhere else\"\n- \"Listen to this fucker snore like he pays the damn bills 🙄\"\n- Uses custom emojis like <:skeledino:>, <:babydino:>, <:secretcrashout:>\n- \"Ain't no way the 22 year old just called me Lil bro\"\n- \"I said 30 seconds\"\n\nSet 2:\n- \"So mean\" (appears twice)\n- \"Crazy combo\"\n- \"I showd u my earring\" (note the typo \"showd\")\n- \"Hush now\"\n- \"Glam isnt rage baiting\" (appears twice, note missing apostrophe)\n- \"No o just checked\" (note the typo \"o\" instead of \"I\")\n- \"Tell me\"\n- \"5 furry femboys added\"\n\nAnalyzing the writing styles:\n\nSet 1:\n- Uses more complete sentences\n- More profanity and stronger language\n- Uses \"ain't\" showing casual/colloquial speech\n- Uses custom Discord emojis\n- Generally longer, more developed thoughts\n- More aggressive/assertive tone\n- Uses proper capitalization mostly\n\nSet 2:\n- Much shorter phrases/sentences\n- Multiple typos and missing punctuation (\"showd\", \"isnt\", \"o\" instead of \"I\")\n- Repeats phrases exactly (\"So mean\", \"Glam isnt rage baiting\")\n- Very casual, almost stream-of-consciousness style\n- Less aggressive, more conversational\n- Inconsistent capitalization\n\nThe writing styles are quite different:\n1. Set 1 shows more developed language skills with longer sentences and proper grammar (mostly)\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nthats horrifying\n<sep>\ncat gif after that is insane\n<sep>\nwoahh\n<sep>\noh yeahh frr\n<sep>\nhi robro\n<sep>\nLOCKED INN\n<sep>\nis grandma evil\n<sep>\nwaitt going to eat bye everyone have fun gaming/chatting\n<sep>\nwoahh\n<sep>\nTHAT SCARED\n\nSet 2:\nomgg anon i love mygo\n<sep>\nohh\n<sep>\nSTOPP WHAT\n<sep>\nwoahh wait thats so fireee\n<sep>\nohh that sounds fun\n<sep>\nis it bad to have a fuck it we ball mindset when job hunting\n<sep>\nhe was born to be steve real\n<sep>\nwaitt going to eat bye everyone have fun gaming/chatting\n<sep>\nOHHH\n<sep>\nwhat do you usually watch"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for similarities and differences in writing style, tone, punctuation, and other characteristics.\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- Uses casual, informal language\n- Multiple instances of elongated words with repeated letters: \"woahh\", \"yeahh\", \"frr\", \"waitt\"\n- Uses all caps for emphasis: \"LOCKED INN\", \"THAT SCARED\"\n- Short, exclamatory messages\n- Uses \"woahh\" twice\n- The exact phrase \"waitt going to eat bye everyone have fun gaming/chatting\" appears\n- Generally expressive, casual tone\n- Uses \"thats\" without apostrophe\n- Mix of lowercase and caps\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- Similar casual, informal language\n- Multiple instances of elongated words: \"omgg\", \"ohh\", \"woahh\", \"fireee\", \"waitt\"\n- Uses all caps for emphasis: \"STOPP WHAT\", \"OHHH\"\n- Short, exclamatory messages\n- Uses \"ohh\" multiple times, \"woahh\" once\n- The EXACT same phrase appears: \"waitt going to eat bye everyone have fun gaming/chatting\"\n- Similar expressive, casual tone\n- Same pattern of elongating words with repeated letters\n- Mix of lowercase and caps\n\nKey similarities:\n1. The identical phrase \"waitt going to eat bye everyone have fun gaming/chatting\" is a very strong indicator - this exact wording and spelling is quite distinctive\n2. Both use the same pattern of elongating words: \"woahh\", \"waitt\", \"ohh\"/\"ohhh\"\n3. Both use all caps for emphasis in similar ways\n4. Both have the same casual, excited tone\n5. Both use similar punctuation patterns (or lack thereof)\n6. Both spell \"wait\" as \"waitt\" consistently\n7. The overall style and voice are very consistent\n\nThe identical phrase is particularly compelling evidence, as it's quite specific and includes the distinctive spelling \"waitt\" and the specific farewell message structure.\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nthats horrifying\n<sep>\ncat gif after that is insane\n<sep>\nwoahh\n<sep>\noh yeahh frr\n<sep>\nhi robro\n<sep>\nLOCKED INN\n<sep>\nis grandma evil\n<sep>\nwaitt going to eat bye everyone have fun gaming/chatting\n<sep>\nwoahh\n<sep>\nTHAT SCARED\n\nSet 2:\nhttps://tenor.com/view/soggy-cat-cat-bath-shower-cute-gif-26528563\n<sep>\nI like u\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/morrissey-the-smiths-this-charming-man-johnny-marr-gif-27582811\n<sep>\nYuuuus! 😌\n<sep>\nIts just below the emoji spot in settings. Click it and you can upload pics\n<sep>\nYou will always have me\n<sep>\nCan i join ur micro penis club\n<sep>\nme when i come face to face with <uid>\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/morrissey-the-smiths-this-charming-man-johnny-marr-gif-27582811\n<sep>\nbestie hi"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution.\n\nSet 1 characteristics:\n- Informal, lowercase style (\"thats\", \"yeahh\", \"frr\")\n- Uses \"woahh\" (appears twice)\n- Short, simple expressions\n- Gaming/casual chat context\n- Uses \"LOCKED INN\" and \"THAT SCARED\" in all caps\n- Simple vocabulary and sentence structure\n- No URLs or links\n- Casual goodbyes (\"waitt going to eat bye everyone have fun gaming/chatting\")\n\nSet 2 characteristics:\n- More varied content including URLs (tenor.com gif links)\n- More expressive and personal (\"I like u\", \"You will always have me\")\n- Uses emojis (😌)\n- More sophisticated/playful language\n- References to specific features (\"Its just below the emoji spot in settings\")\n- More intimate/personal tone (\"bestie hi\")\n- Contains crude humor (\"Can i join ur micro penis club\")\n- Multiple gif links suggesting more engaged multimedia communication\n\nKey differences:\n1. Writing style: Set 1 is more basic/simple, Set 2 is more varied and expressive\n2. Content type: Set 1 is mostly simple reactions, Set 2 includes instructions, personal statements, and multimedia\n3. Tone: Set 1 feels more like gaming chat reactions, Set 2 feels more personal/intimate\n4. Technical engagement: Set 2 shows more platform familiarity (sharing gifs, explaining features)\n5. Vocabulary: Set 1 uses simpler expressions, Set 2 has more diverse language\n\nThe writing styles seem quite different. Set 1 appears to be someone making simple reactions in what seems like a gaming context, while Set 2 shows someone who is more engaged with the platform features, uses more personal language, and has a different communication pattern.\n\nHowever, I should also consider that these could be the same person in different contexts or moods. But the differences in:\n- Technical sophistication \n- Communication style\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nthey said they was gonna make it accurate to the books to but... that clery doesnt seem to be true\n<sep>\nyeah... hoping someone to die is not a good mindset to have , and cancer is one of the worse things I would not want even my enemies to get\n<sep>\nunderwear only aint much clothes XD\n<sep>\nI cannot remember every naked Male ive seen in that ....**place**\n<sep>\nthey arnt neckbeard tho\n<sep>\nblue isnt even verified\n<sep>\neh no one you know probs\n<sep>\nhttps://x.com/PowerfulMarlo/status/1924917343769309308\n<sep>\nshow up to an event in person AND WEARING Clothes\n<sep>\nI erased that from my mind idk\n\nSet 2:\nprostate cancer you can have for awhile and live for years\n<sep>\n<uid> I see you there 👀\n<sep>\nsnape being race swapped is the oddest choice tho people are saying now when harrys dad bullies him its gonna seem racist\n<sep>\nsup\n<sep>\nsnape being race swapped is the oddest choice tho people are saying now when harrys dad bullies him its gonna seem racist\n<sep>\nHarry , ron and hermi havent been casted yet tho or atleast annouced who will play the,\n<sep>\nthat was awhile ago . but yeah gonna miss her too\n<sep>\nI erased that from my mind idk\n<sep>\nshe was only ever nice to me tbh\n<sep>\ndamn your no longer a furry"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing style, tone, and patterns in both sets to determine if they're from the same author.\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- Uses informal language and abbreviations (\"aint\", \"arnt\", \"probs\", \"tho\")\n- Has spelling errors and typos (\"clery\" instead of \"clearly\", \"arnt\" instead of \"aren't\")\n- Uses casual internet slang (XD, ...)\n- Has grammar issues and casual punctuation\n- Uses lowercase for proper nouns sometimes\n- The phrase \"I erased that from my mind idk\" appears\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- Also uses informal language and abbreviations (\"tho\", \"gonna\")\n- Has similar spelling/grammar issues (\"hermi\" instead of \"Hermione\", missing apostrophes)\n- Uses casual tone\n- Has some of the same informal patterns\n- The exact same phrase \"I erased that from my mind idk\" appears\n- Similar casual internet writing style\n\nKey similarities:\n1. Both use \"tho\" instead of \"though\"\n2. Both use \"gonna\" \n3. Both have casual grammar and spelling errors\n4. Both use informal internet writing style\n5. Most importantly, both contain the exact phrase \"I erased that from my mind idk\" - this is a very specific and unusual phrase that strongly suggests same authorship\n6. Similar tone and level of formality throughout\n7. Both discuss pop culture topics (books/movies, social media)\n8. Similar punctuation patterns and lack of proper capitalization in some cases\n\nThe identical phrase \"I erased that from my mind idk\" is particularly telling - it's unlikely two different people would use this exact same unusual expression. Combined with the consistent informal writing style, spelling patterns, and tone, this strongly indicates the same author.\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nthey said they was gonna make it accurate to the books to but... that clery doesnt seem to be true\n<sep>\nyeah... hoping someone to die is not a good mindset to have , and cancer is one of the worse things I would not want even my enemies to get\n<sep>\nunderwear only aint much clothes XD\n<sep>\nI cannot remember every naked Male ive seen in that ....**place**\n<sep>\nthey arnt neckbeard tho\n<sep>\nblue isnt even verified\n<sep>\neh no one you know probs\n<sep>\nhttps://x.com/PowerfulMarlo/status/1924917343769309308\n<sep>\nshow up to an event in person AND WEARING Clothes\n<sep>\nI erased that from my mind idk\n\nSet 2:\nOh-\n<sep>\nHe's cheating on you nate\n<sep>\nNate bum stinky\n<sep>\nCan they add a block option jesus\n<sep>\nMe too\n<sep>\n😭😭😭\n<sep>\n🙏🏼\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/roblox-sob-looks-looks-up-and-down-stares-gif-14387979942218882666\n<sep>\n😭\n<sep>\nAnyway"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author or different authors.\n\nSet 1 analysis:\n- Lowercase writing style, often not capitalizing the first word of sentences\n- Uses casual internet slang (\"aint\", \"arnt\", \"probs\")\n- Makes spelling/grammar errors (\"clery\" instead of \"clearly\", \"arnt\" instead of \"aren't\")\n- Longer, more complex sentences\n- Uses \"XD\" emoticon\n- Uses asterisks for emphasis (**place**)\n- Content seems to discuss various topics like books/adaptations, cancer, clothing, naked people, verification status\n- Uses \"they\" pronouns inconsistently (sometimes \"they was\" instead of \"they were\")\n- Generally more verbose and explanatory\n\nSet 2 analysis:\n- Very short, terse messages\n- Proper capitalization in most cases\n- Uses emoji reactions (😭😭😭, 🙏🏼)\n- Much simpler sentence structure\n- Seems to be having a conversation about someone named \"Nate\"\n- Uses \"jesus\" without capitalization\n- Includes a gif link\n- More conversational, reactive style\n- Messages are brief and seem to be responses in an ongoing chat\n\nKey differences:\n1. Writing style: Set 1 uses lowercase casual style with poor grammar, Set 2 uses more standard capitalization\n2. Length: Set 1 has longer, more complex messages, Set 2 has very short responses\n3. Emoticons vs emojis: Set 1 uses \"XD\", Set 2 uses modern emojis\n4. Grammar: Set 1 has consistent grammar errors and casual spelling, Set 2 is more standard\n5. Content style: Set 1 seems more thoughtful/explanatory, Set 2 is more reactive/conversational\n6. Vocabulary: Set 1 uses internet slang like \"aint\", \"probs\", Set 2 is more standard\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nNITRO\n<sep>\nYes\n<sep>\n<:AST_pandagirlhug:880690538439913494>\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/meet-quack-quack-late-night-snack-late-night-cake-gif-7975385212396591518\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/duck-waddle-gif-12573743802001671415\n<sep>\nNgl the vampire Rudophf was good looking for a kid\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/meet-quack-quack-late-night-snack-late-night-cake-gif-7975385212396591518\n<sep>\n❤️🥺❤️\n<sep>\nNot much\n<sep>\nHave u seen\n\nSet 2:\nHave u seen\n<sep>\nHelp\n<sep>\n😭\n<sep>\n😦\n<sep>\nHave u guys seen the movie\n<sep>\nTHE\n<sep>\n<a:stitchLaugh:893851244366549033>\n<sep>\n<:gasp:1355056628285575262>\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/lilo-and-stitch-puppy-cute-stitch-dog-gif-903607498614966812\n<sep>\nNo cute huggy emote"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze both sets of messages for writing style, tone, punctuation, content, etc.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"NITRO\" - single word\n- \"Yes\" - single word response\n- Uses custom Discord emotes: \"<:AST_pandagirlhug:880690538439913494>\"\n- Links to tenor GIFs about ducks/quacking\n- \"Ngl the vampire Rudophf was good looking for a kid\" - casual internet slang \"ngl\" (not gonna lie), misspelling \"Rudolf\" as \"Rudophf\"\n- More tenor GIF links\n- Uses heart and pleading face emojis: \"❤️🥺❤️\"\n- \"Not much\" - brief response\n- \"Have u seen\" - incomplete sentence, uses \"u\" instead of \"you\"\n\nSet 2:\n- \"Have u seen\" - same incomplete sentence as end of Set 1, uses \"u\" instead of \"you\"\n- \"Help\" - single word\n- Crying emoji: \"😭\"\n- Surprised emoji: \"😦\"\n- \"Have u guys seen the movie\" - similar structure to previous \"Have u seen\", uses \"u\" instead of \"you\"\n- \"THE\" - single word in caps\n- Uses custom Discord emote: \"<a:stitchLaugh:893851244366549033>\"\n- Another custom Discord emote: \"<:gasp:1355056628285575262>\"\n- Links to tenor GIF about Lilo and Stitch\n- \"No cute huggy emote\" - refers to emotes\n\nSimilarities:\n1. Both use \"u\" instead of \"you\" consistently\n2. Both use custom Discord emotes (the format with colons and numbers)\n3. Both link to tenor GIFs\n4. Both have very casual, informal tone\n5. Both use brief, sometimes incomplete sentences\n6. Both reference emotes/emoticons\n7. The phrase \"Have u seen\" appears in both sets\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nDont tell me your bald or somthing and there is no hair to pull\n<sep>\nDont tell me your bald or somthing and there is no hair to pull\n<sep>\nshe is overrated\n<sep>\ndumbledoor is also gonna be played by an American who is pretty old tbh ..... ppl dont think he will live with all the seasons\n<sep>\n~~no~~\n<sep>\nso far one major casting role they announced is controversial\n<sep>\noh its you again . the gym person\n<sep>\nthis just-in\n<sep>\ndumbledoor is also gonna be played by an American who is pretty old tbh ..... ppl dont think he will live with all the seasons\n<sep>\nits a place that makes me blind if I look in it\n\nSet 2:\nthey making a tv show\n<sep>\nits alos odd they do that too since that crowd hates harrypoter due to jks..... things she said\n<sep>\nthey arnt neckbeard tho\n<sep>\nblue isnt even verified\n<sep>\nits a place that makes me blind if I look in it\n<sep>\nI erased that from my mind idk\n<sep>\nDont tell me your bald or somthing and there is no hair to pull\n<sep>\nyou and another furry I know do\n<sep>\nshe was only ever nice to me tbh\n<sep>\ntrue , again I also do get why ppl be mad at him especially with how alot of doctors are saying its impossible for him not to have had it for 5 years and not know due to it being stage 4"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing style, tone, and characteristics of both sets of messages:\n\nSet 1:\n- \"Dont tell me your bald or somthing and there is no hair to pull\" (appears twice)\n- \"she is overrated\"\n- \"dumbledoor is also gonna be played by an American who is pretty old tbh ..... ppl dont think he will live with all the seasons\" (appears twice)\n- \"~~no~~\"\n- \"so far one major casting role they announced is controversial\"\n- \"oh its you again . the gym person\"\n- \"this just-in\"\n- \"its a place that makes me blind if I look in it\"\n\nSet 2:\n- \"they making a tv show\"\n- \"its alos odd they do that too since that crowd hates harrypoter due to jks..... things she said\"\n- \"they arnt neckbeard tho\"\n- \"blue isnt even verified\"\n- \"its a place that makes me blind if I look in it\"\n- \"I erased that from my mind idk\"\n- \"Dont tell me your bald or somthing and there is no hair to pull\"\n- \"you and another furry I know do\"\n- \"she was only ever nice to me tbh\"\n- \"true , again I also do get why ppl be mad at him especially with how alot of doctors are saying its impossible for him not to have had it for 5 years and not know due to it being stage 4\"\n\nCommon characteristics I notice:\n\n1. Spelling/typos:\n - \"somthing\" instead of \"something\" (appears in both sets)\n - \"dumbledoor\" instead of \"Dumbledore\" (Set 1)\n - \"harrypoter\" instead of \"Harry Potter\" (Set 2)\n - \"alos\" instead of \"also\" (Set 2)\n - \"arnt\" instead of \"aren't\" (Set 2)\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nDont tell me your bald or somthing and there is no hair to pull\n<sep>\nDont tell me your bald or somthing and there is no hair to pull\n<sep>\nshe is overrated\n<sep>\ndumbledoor is also gonna be played by an American who is pretty old tbh ..... ppl dont think he will live with all the seasons\n<sep>\n~~no~~\n<sep>\nso far one major casting role they announced is controversial\n<sep>\noh its you again . the gym person\n<sep>\nthis just-in\n<sep>\ndumbledoor is also gonna be played by an American who is pretty old tbh ..... ppl dont think he will live with all the seasons\n<sep>\nits a place that makes me blind if I look in it\n\nSet 2:\nLike when a given thought enters the consciousness I always made it a point to acknowledge it.\n<sep>\nIstg\n<sep>\n2nd one. Meh\n<sep>\n… here comes the sun.\n<sep>\nFuck\n<sep>\nBro Richard Jenkins had me weak as fuck\n<sep>\nLike… 8 years.\n<sep>\nPancakes!\n<sep>\nOn that note I recently learned how to riffle shuffle in the air (or faro shuffle I guess). As a grown ass man I feel like I got too excited about it ngl.\n<sep>\nI had to rewatch that scene. Holy shit no way that movie gets made today. Oof."
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for authorship attribution.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"Dont tell me your bald or somthing and there is no hair to pull\" (appears twice)\n- \"she is overrated\"\n- \"dumbledoor is also gonna be played by an American who is pretty old tbh ..... ppl dont think he will live with all the seasons\" (appears twice)\n- \"~~no~~\"\n- \"so far one major casting role they announced is controversial\"\n- \"oh its you again . the gym person\"\n- \"this just-in\"\n- \"its a place that makes me blind if I look in it\"\n\nSet 2:\n- \"Like when a given thought enters the consciousness I always made it a point to acknowledge it.\"\n- \"Istg\"\n- \"2nd one. Meh\"\n- \"… here comes the sun.\"\n- \"Fuck\"\n- \"Bro Richard Jenkins had me weak as fuck\"\n- \"Like… 8 years.\"\n- \"Pancakes!\"\n- \"On that note I recently learned how to riffle shuffle in the air (or faro shuffle I guess). As a grown ass man I feel like I got too excited about it ngl.\"\n- \"I had to rewatch that scene. Holy shit no way that movie gets made today. Oof.\"\n\nLet me analyze the writing style differences:\n\n**Spelling and Grammar:**\nSet 1: \n- Frequent misspellings: \"Dont\" (missing apostrophe), \"somthing\" (something), \"your\" (you're), \"dumbledoor\" (Dumbledore)\n- Inconsistent capitalization\n- Informal punctuation patterns with multiple periods \".....\"\n\nSet 2:\n- Proper spelling throughout\n- More sophisticated vocabulary and sentence structure\n- Proper capitalization and punctuation\n- Uses abbreviations like \"Istg\" (I swear to God) and \"ngl\" (not gonna lie)\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nWhat time is it for you cus it’s now 3am for me\n<sep>\nOh wait time difference\n<sep>\nNo wait they’re not poisonous\n<sep>\nI hear scorpions are good for that\n<sep>\nAnyways. God. There’s a name for the alcohol though\n<sep>\nFor instance it’s 2:50 am in the morning and I’m making coffee for this exact purpose. I listen to music while I smoke and drink my coffee\n<sep>\nMoney\n<sep>\nAnyways. God. There’s a name for the alcohol though\n<sep>\nOhhhh\n<sep>\nWhat time is it for you cus it’s now 3am for me\n\nSet 2:\nBlondie over there\n<sep>\nDoing gods work\n<sep>\nGod bless em\n<sep>\nHi Neal. Fancy seeing you at this absurd hour of morning\n<sep>\nTacos murdered my boy\n<sep>\nSanta La Muerte\n<sep>\nFor me it’s Cafe La Llave, it’s a decent taste. My favorite used to be Cubita but I can’t find it anywhere anymore\n<sep>\nAnyways. God. There’s a name for the alcohol though\n<sep>\nSee this is why I blocked that guy. Too melodramatic\n<sep>\nI mean, I’m melodramatic but not like dat. Geez Louis"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing style, tone, and patterns in both sets of messages.\n\nSet 1:\n- Very casual, informal tone\n- Uses \"cus\" instead of \"because\"\n- Mentions time (3am, 2:50 am) \n- References to coffee, smoking, music\n- \"Anyways. God. There's a name for the alcohol though\" - this exact phrase appears twice\n- Short, fragmented sentences\n- Stream of consciousness style\n- Topics jump around (time, scorpions, alcohol, coffee)\n\nSet 2:\n- Also casual and informal\n- \"Fancy seeing you at this absurd hour of morning\" - more elaborate phrasing\n- References to coffee brands (Cafe La Llave, Cubita)\n- \"Anyways. God. There's a name for the alcohol though\" - EXACT same phrase as in Set 1\n- \"Geez Louis\" - specific expression\n- \"See this is why I blocked that guy. Too melodramatic\" followed by \"I mean, I'm melodramatic but not like dat\"\n- Similar stream of consciousness, jumping topics\n\nKey similarities:\n1. The exact phrase \"Anyways. God. There's a name for the alcohol though\" appears in both sets - this is a very specific and unusual phrase\n2. Both mention early morning hours/late night timing\n3. Both have references to coffee\n4. Both have very casual, stream-of-consciousness writing style\n5. Both use informal contractions and casual language\n6. Similar fragmented sentence structure\n\nThe repeated exact phrase \"Anyways. God. There's a name for the alcohol though\" is particularly telling - this is not a common phrase and its exact repetition suggests the same author. The overall tone, style, and casual approach are also very consistent between the two sets.\n\nWhile there are some differences in specific topics discussed, the underlying writing patterns, the exact repeated phrase, and the overall voice seem to match.\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nWhat time is it for you cus it’s now 3am for me\n<sep>\nOh wait time difference\n<sep>\nNo wait they’re not poisonous\n<sep>\nI hear scorpions are good for that\n<sep>\nAnyways. God. There’s a name for the alcohol though\n<sep>\nFor instance it’s 2:50 am in the morning and I’m making coffee for this exact purpose. I listen to music while I smoke and drink my coffee\n<sep>\nMoney\n<sep>\nAnyways. God. There’s a name for the alcohol though\n<sep>\nOhhhh\n<sep>\nWhat time is it for you cus it’s now 3am for me\n\nSet 2:\nHe didn't pay the selfbot tariff\n<sep>\neven if OpenAI voluntarily did this, will xAI? of course not\n<sep>\nAI won't automate away plumbers but it will remove our need to shit\n<sep>\neach of those little colored blocks is functionally similar to how you or I read a single letter\n<sep>\nWill upload shortly, bout to put baby down for a snooze\n<sep>\ni think my favorite silly use of chatgpt is to ask it to describe the similarities between two totally unrelated things\n<sep>\ndoesnt this just test for overfitting on the more common variant of this question and its answer\n<sep>\nIdk but I banned the retarded Indian\n<sep>\nrn the only issue is\n<sep>\n<uid> you ever read any of the absolutely deranged shit by the O9A? They're so cartoonishly insane they hardly seem real"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing styles, tone, and characteristics of both sets.\n\nSet 1:\n- Very casual, informal style\n- Uses \"cus\" instead of \"because\"\n- Very short, fragmented messages\n- Shows stream of consciousness thinking\n- Topics jump around randomly (time, scorpions, alcohol, coffee, money)\n- Uses \"God\" as an interjection/filler\n- Repetitive (two identical messages about time)\n- Uses abbreviations like \"am\" for morning\n- Overall very informal, scattered thoughts\n\nSet 2:\n- More varied message lengths\n- More complete sentences and thoughts\n- Uses more technical/sophisticated vocabulary (\"tariff\", \"automate\", \"overfitting\")\n- Discusses more complex topics (AI, technology, etc.)\n- Uses some slang but in a different way\n- Uses \"rn\" for \"right now\"\n- References specific things like OpenAI, xAI, chatgpt\n- Contains some offensive language\n- More coherent flow of ideas within individual messages\n- Uses \"<uid>\" which suggests familiarity with certain platforms/formats\n\nKey differences I notice:\n1. Complexity of thought: Set 1 is very scattered and simple, Set 2 shows more complex reasoning\n2. Vocabulary: Set 1 uses very basic vocabulary, Set 2 uses more sophisticated terms\n3. Topics: Set 1 is random personal stuff (time, coffee, scorpions), Set 2 is more focused on technology and specific subjects\n4. Sentence structure: Set 1 has very fragmented thoughts, Set 2 has more complete ideas\n5. Abbreviation style: Both use abbreviations but differently (\"cus\" vs \"rn\")\n\nThe writing styles feel quite different - Set 1 seems like someone who is tired/distracted (mentions it's 3am, drinking coffee), while Set 2 seems more alert and engaged in substantive conversations. The level of discourse is notably different.\n\nWhile both are informal, the patterns of informality are different enough that I lean toward these being different authors.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nIt’s not about her\n<sep>\nBecause I’m too sexy\n<sep>\nYou’re a monster\n<sep>\nMake a lot of money for the family\n<sep>\nAlso that’s not even Ziggy\n<sep>\nhttps://youtu.be/bHw_m0vMDW0?si=3rpahti-wj3iOqsZ\n\nhello\n<sep>\nA front for my drug empire yes\n<sep>\nThat’s why\n<sep>\nI broke your heart too ?\n<sep>\nThen stfu\n\nSet 2:\nBeing fr\n<sep>\nI made a dollar out of my music !!!!\n<sep>\nI need someone to help me with something\n<sep>\nI make people sleep depressed and idk\n<sep>\nNew album cover finalised\n<sep>\nFuck it I’ll call it ogre sex\n<sep>\nLmao\n<sep>\nShut up Miranda\n<sep>\nWow nice pic !\n<sep>\nI can still write heartbreak songs and still be a cunt and break hearts"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages for writing style, tone, punctuation, content, and other characteristics.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"It's not about her\"\n- \"Because I'm too sexy\"\n- \"You're a monster\"\n- \"Make a lot of money for the family\"\n- \"Also that's not even Ziggy\"\n- \"https://youtu.be/bHw_m0vMDW0?si=3rpahti-wj3iOqsZ hello\"\n- \"A front for my drug empire yes\"\n- \"That's why\"\n- \"I broke your heart too ?\"\n- \"Then stfu\"\n\nSet 2:\n- \"Being fr\"\n- \"I made a dollar out of my music !!!!\"\n- \"I need someone to help me with something\"\n- \"I make people sleep depressed and idk\"\n- \"New album cover finalised\"\n- \"Fuck it I'll call it ogre sex\"\n- \"Lmao\"\n- \"Shut up Miranda\"\n- \"Wow nice pic !\"\n- \"I can still write heartbreak songs and still be a cunt and break hearts\"\n\nAnalysis:\n\nTone and Language:\n- Both sets use casual, informal language\n- Both have a somewhat edgy/provocative tone\n- Both use profanity (\"stfu\" in Set 1, \"Fuck it\" and \"cunt\" in Set 2)\n- Both have a confident, sometimes boastful tone\n\nContent themes:\n- Set 1 mentions music indirectly through YouTube link, \"drug empire\" (possibly metaphorical)\n- Set 2 explicitly talks about music (\"my music\", \"album cover\", \"heartbreak songs\")\n- Both mention relationships/heartbreak (\"I broke your heart too?\" vs \"write heartbreak songs and still be a cunt and break hearts\")\n- Both have references to money/success\n\nWriting style:\n- Set 1: More varied punctuation, uses \"?\" in \"I broke your heart too ?\"\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nIt’s not about her\n<sep>\nBecause I’m too sexy\n<sep>\nYou’re a monster\n<sep>\nMake a lot of money for the family\n<sep>\nAlso that’s not even Ziggy\n<sep>\nhttps://youtu.be/bHw_m0vMDW0?si=3rpahti-wj3iOqsZ\n\nhello\n<sep>\nA front for my drug empire yes\n<sep>\nThat’s why\n<sep>\nI broke your heart too ?\n<sep>\nThen stfu\n\nSet 2:\nroteiro pra série de 20 temporadas?\n<sep>\nestou rindo?\n<sep>\noxi\n<sep>\nbixo e eu tava fazendo janta\n<sep>\nverdade como soube?\n<sep>\n<:emoji_108:1350995928047423650>\n<sep>\nmas na maioria dos casos uma placa não explicará oq de fato acontece no estabelecimento\n<sep>\nnós preocupados com o sumiço do umbra\numbra enquanto isso:\n<sep>\ntomar no seu cu\n<sep>\n🖕🖕🖕🖕"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages to determine if they were written by the same author or different authors.\n\nSet 1:\n- Contains short, informal phrases in English\n- Uses casual internet language (\"stfu\", \"That's why\")\n- Includes a YouTube link\n- Mix of personal statements and conversational responses\n- Some messages seem like responses to someone else\n- Tone varies from casual to somewhat confrontational\n- Uses \"I'm too sexy\", \"You're a monster\", \"Make a lot of money for the family\"\n- English language throughout\n\nSet 2:\n- Contains messages in Portuguese \n- Uses casual Brazilian Portuguese expressions (\"oxi\", \"bixo\", \"tomar no seu cu\")\n- Includes an emoji reference (<:emoji_108:1350995928047423650>)\n- Contains profanity in Portuguese (\"tomar no seu cu\")\n- Uses middle finger emojis (🖕🖕🖕🖕)\n- References someone named \"umbra\"\n- More conversational, discussing daily activities like making dinner (\"eu tava fazendo janta\")\n\nKey differences:\n1. Language: Set 1 is entirely in English, Set 2 is entirely in Portuguese\n2. Cultural context: Set 1 seems more generic English internet speak, Set 2 has distinctly Brazilian Portuguese expressions\n3. Topics: Different subject matters and references\n4. Writing patterns: Different sentence structures typical of their respective languages\n\nHowever, there are some similarities:\n1. Both use casual, informal language\n2. Both contain some confrontational/edgy content\n3. Both use internet slang and casual expressions\n4. Both have short, fragmented messages typical of chat conversations\n\nThe language difference is quite significant. While it's possible for someone to be bilingual and switch between languages depending on who they're talking to, the cultural expressions and slang used in Set 2 suggest someone very familiar with Brazilian Portuguese culture, while Set 1 shows typical English internet culture.\n\nThe tone and style are somewhat similar in terms of casualness and informality, but this could just be typical of casual internet conversation in general rather than indicating the same author.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nNone\n<sep>\nNot a bad idea tbh\n<sep>\n!bj 100\n<sep>\nBeing nice gets you tiddie pics\n<sep>\nCan tap in too?\n<sep>\nCat\n<sep>\nExit\n<sep>\nMwah\n<sep>\nHoler at my dms bbg\n<sep>\nLet me be the judge\n\nSet 2:\nunstubbable?\n<sep>\n\"oh woe is me, my life sucks blah blah\"\n<sep>\nhttps://tenor.com/view/peaky-boys-gif-21252515\n<sep>\n<uid> are you in agreement with my singularity opinion\n<sep>\nyou really seem to inflate the problems a lot\n<sep>\n<a:horsehuh:1326451641637015572>\n<sep>\nlol sick\n<sep>\nit mostly comes down to 2 groups. People who use it for education and testing. or people are just extremely bored and using it to fill their time\n<sep>\nworse as in what\n<sep>\nwhy"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze these two sets of messages to see if they were written by the same author.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"None\"\n- \"Not a bad idea tbh\"\n- \"!bj 100\" (appears to be a command)\n- \"Being nice gets you tiddie pics\"\n- \"Can tap in too?\"\n- \"Cat\"\n- \"Exit\"\n- \"Mwah\"\n- \"Holer at my dms bbg\"\n- \"Let me be the judge\"\n\nSet 2:\n- \"unstubbable?\"\n- \"oh woe is me, my life sucks blah blah\"\n- \"https://tenor.com/view/peaky-boys-gif-21252515\" (a link)\n- \"<uid> are you in agreement with my singularity opinion\"\n- \"you really seem to inflate the problems a lot\"\n- \"<a:horsehuh:1326451641637015572>\" (appears to be an emoji)\n- \"lol sick\"\n- \"it mostly comes down to 2 groups. People who use it for education and testing. or people are just extremely bored and using it to fill their time\"\n- \"worse as in what\"\n- \"why\"\n\nLet me analyze these:\n\n**Tone and Style:**\nSet 1: Very casual, playful, flirtatious (\"tiddie pics\", \"bbg\", \"Mwah\", \"Holer at my dms\"). Uses internet slang (\"tbh\"). Some messages are very short (\"Cat\", \"Exit\"). Has a more immature/casual gaming vibe.\n\nSet 2: More conversational and analytical. Has some casual elements (\"lol sick\") but overall seems more thoughtful and engaged in actual discussion. The longer message about \"2 groups\" shows more structured thinking. Uses quotes and seems to be responding to someone's complaints.\n\n**Language patterns:**\nSet 1: Uses abbreviations (\"tbh\", \"bbg\"), very informal spelling (\"Holer\" instead of \"Holla\"), sexual references\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nFuck you!!!!!!!\n<sep>\nThis straight white man deserves nothing. He's a scumbag by design\n<sep>\nJust say \"nooo I don't have mouses in my belly\" like everybody else\n<sep>\nUr broken\n<sep>\nI'd punch u in the jaw\n<sep>\nUr broken\n<sep>\nWorking from home is great because I don't have to deal with pre-nut delusion\n<sep>\nI haven't smoked since feb\n<sep>\nHey are you a glow stick?\n<sep>\nThe second greatest country in the world\n\nSet 2:\nMaybe you should go back and bury the poor soul\n<sep>\nEw weirdo\n<sep>\nWhy not?\n<sep>\nUnheard of\n<sep>\nAlso before n after\n<sep>\nBut I've never seen a tiger like these ladies before\n<sep>\nThese tigers are HUUUUugeeEEE\n<sep>\nThis straight white man deserves nothing. He's a scumbag by design\n<sep>\nAh so it's true\n<sep>\nWorking from home is great because I don't have to deal with pre-nut delusion"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze both sets of messages for writing style, tone, punctuation, vocabulary, and content patterns.\n\nSet 1:\n- \"Fuck you!!!!!!!\" - Very aggressive, multiple exclamation marks\n- \"This straight white man deserves nothing. He's a scumbag by design\" - Political/social commentary, complete sentence with proper grammar\n- \"Just say \"nooo I don't have mouses in my belly\" like everybody else\" - Informal, playful tone, incorrect grammar (\"mouses\" instead of \"mice\")\n- \"Ur broken\" (appears twice) - Very short, text speak abbreviation \"Ur\"\n- \"I'd punch u in the jaw\" - Aggressive, uses \"u\" instead of \"you\"\n- \"Working from home is great because I don't have to deal with pre-nut delusion\" - Crude humor, complete sentence\n- \"I haven't smoked since feb\" - Personal statement, lowercase \"feb\"\n- \"Hey are you a glow stick?\" - Random question, seems like setup for a joke\n- \"The second greatest country in the world\" - Fragment, seems like part of a larger conversation\n\nSet 2:\n- \"Maybe you should go back and bury the poor soul\" - Complete sentence, somewhat dark humor\n- \"Ew weirdo\" - Very short, informal\n- \"Why not?\" - Simple question\n- \"Unheard of\" - Two word response\n- \"Also before n after\" - Text speak \"n\" for \"and\"\n- \"But I've never seen a tiger like these ladies before\" - Complete sentence about tigers\n- \"These tigers are HUUUUugeeEEE\" - Playful emphasis with repeated letters\n- \"This straight white man deserves nothing. He's a scumbag by design\" - EXACT same message as in Set 1\n- \"Ah so it's true\" - Simple response\n- \"Working from home is great because I don't have to deal with pre-nut delusion\" - EXACT same message as in Set 1\n</think>\nSAME_AUTHOR"
}
] |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an authorship attribution assistant. You will be shown two sets of messages. If you think they were written by the same author, reply with nothing but SAME_AUTHOR. If you think they were written by different authors, reply with nothing but DIFFERENT_AUTHOR.\nWhen considering how to answer, think about the tone, writing style, punctuation, message content, etc, and use this to formulate your answer."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Set 1:\nFuck you!!!!!!!\n<sep>\nThis straight white man deserves nothing. He's a scumbag by design\n<sep>\nJust say \"nooo I don't have mouses in my belly\" like everybody else\n<sep>\nUr broken\n<sep>\nI'd punch u in the jaw\n<sep>\nUr broken\n<sep>\nWorking from home is great because I don't have to deal with pre-nut delusion\n<sep>\nI haven't smoked since feb\n<sep>\nHey are you a glow stick?\n<sep>\nThe second greatest country in the world\n\nSet 2:\nNah let me not get banned😭\n<sep>\n<uid>\n<sep>\nFantastic\n<sep>\nOur kind?\n<sep>\nCrybaby\n<sep>\n<uid>\n<sep>\nI'm cool with\n<sep>\nGod damn that's one way calling someone black\n<sep>\n<uid>\n<sep>\nWhatever the fuck it is"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "<think>\nLet me analyze the writing style, tone, and patterns in both sets of messages:\n\nSet 1:\n- Contains very aggressive language: \"Fuck you!!!!!!!\", \"I'd punch u in the jaw\"\n- Uses abbreviated forms: \"Ur broken\" (repeated twice)\n- Has some casual/crude references: \"pre-nut delusion\", \"mouses in my belly\"\n- Mix of aggressive and casual tones\n- Uses multiple exclamation marks\n- Some messages are complete thoughts, others are fragments\n- Contains offensive language directed at groups (\"straight white man\")\n- Has some random/quirky elements like \"Hey are you a glow stick?\"\n\nSet 2:\n- Much less aggressive overall tone\n- Uses crying emoji: \"😭\"\n- Contains \"<uid>\" which appears to be some kind of system tag or reference (appears 3 times)\n- Shorter messages generally\n- Less profanity, though still some: \"Whatever the fuck it is\"\n- Different style of casual language\n- \"Our kind?\" - questioning tone\n- \"Crybaby\" - insulting but less intense than Set 1\n- \"I'm cool with\" - incomplete thought\n- \"God damn that's one way calling someone black\" - different type of commentary\n\nKey differences I notice:\n1. Aggression level: Set 1 is much more aggressive and hostile\n2. Language patterns: Set 1 uses \"Ur\" repeatedly, Set 2 doesn't show this pattern\n3. Punctuation: Set 1 uses excessive exclamation marks, Set 2 uses emoji\n4. Message structure: Set 1 has more complete thoughts mixed with fragments, Set 2 is more fragmentary overall\n5. The \"<uid>\" tags in Set 2 suggest a different context/platform\n6. Tone consistency: Set 1 varies from extremely hostile to casual, Set 2 is more consistently casual with occasional mild aggression\n\nThe writing styles seem quite different. Set 1 shows a pattern of intense aggression and specific linguistic quirks (like \"Ur broken\" repeated, excessive punctuation), while Set 2 shows a different casual style with different types of references and less intense language overall.\n</think>\nDIFFERENT_AUTHOR"
}
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.