Datasets:
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -45,10 +45,24 @@ These data domains are intentionally chosen to cultivate a comprehensive skill s
|
|
| 45 |
| Medical Disease Grading (MDG) | APTOS | 3,662 | 5 grades |
|
| 46 |
| Historical Date Estimation (HDE) | HCI | 1,325 | 5 decades |
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
-
As these datasets provide only images and digital labels, they are designed with a standardized VQA paradigm by reusing their images and modifying the annotations into a textual form to enable MLLMs to undergo joint training for heterogeneous tasks of diverse domains.
|
| 49 |
Specifically, each data sample originally consists of a simple question and a corresponding numeric answer. However, this paradigm can lead to numerical hallucination. Hence, we add extra domain-driven prompts and coarse-to-fine CoT to mitigate this issue.
|
| 50 |
-
An example with the original VQA and our proposed coarse-to-fine CoT process is shown in the following figure. Meanwhile, we adopt the form of text + numbers for the labels to enhance semantic
|
| 51 |

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 52 |
## Evaluation
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
## Examples
|
|
|
|
| 45 |
| Medical Disease Grading (MDG) | APTOS | 3,662 | 5 grades |
|
| 46 |
| Historical Date Estimation (HDE) | HCI | 1,325 | 5 decades |
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
+
**Important notice**: As these datasets provide only images and digital labels, they are designed with a standardized VQA paradigm by reusing their images and modifying the annotations into a textual form to enable MLLMs to undergo joint training for heterogeneous tasks of diverse domains.
|
| 49 |
Specifically, each data sample originally consists of a simple question and a corresponding numeric answer. However, this paradigm can lead to numerical hallucination. Hence, we add extra domain-driven prompts and coarse-to-fine CoT to mitigate this issue.
|
| 50 |
+
An example with the original VQA and our proposed coarse-to-fine CoT process is shown in the following figure. Meanwhile, we adopt the form of text + numbers for the labels to enhance semantic understanding.
|
| 51 |

|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
### STORM Prompts
|
| 54 |
+
```
|
| 55 |
+
<image> You are now an advanced Image Quality Evaluator, and your task is to assess the quality
|
| 56 |
+
of the provided image. Please evaluate the image’s quality based on a 5-rate scale: rate0(Bad),
|
| 57 |
+
rate1(Poor), rate2(Fair), rate3(Good), rate4(Excellent). Please provide the coarse category that can
|
| 58 |
+
help you answer the question better. Please first coarsely categorise the image: rate0-1(Below Fair),
|
| 59 |
+
rate2(Fair), rate3-4(Above Fair). Based on the coarse classification, proceed to make a final rate
|
| 60 |
+
prediction. The specific steps are as follows:
|
| 61 |
+
1. Make the coarse prediction with the candidates:rate0-1(Below Fair), rate2(Fair), rate3-4(Above Fair).
|
| 62 |
+
2. Based on the coarse classification, proceed to make a final age prediction with the candidates: rate0(Bad), rate1(Poor), rate2(Fair), rate3(Good), rate4(Excellent).
|
| 63 |
+
3. Please note that the coarse thoughts and the final answer should be consistent.
|
| 64 |
+
Answer: [Coarse answer], [Final answer]
|
| 65 |
+
```
|
| 66 |
## Evaluation
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
## Examples
|