ttlyy commited on
Commit
5337c5a
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 984074c

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +16 -2
README.md CHANGED
@@ -45,10 +45,24 @@ These data domains are intentionally chosen to cultivate a comprehensive skill s
45
  | Medical Disease Grading (MDG) | APTOS | 3,662 | 5 grades |
46
  | Historical Date Estimation (HDE) | HCI | 1,325 | 5 decades |
47
 
48
- As these datasets provide only images and digital labels, they are designed with a standardized VQA paradigm by reusing their images and modifying the annotations into a textual form to enable MLLMs to undergo joint training for heterogeneous tasks of diverse domains.
49
  Specifically, each data sample originally consists of a simple question and a corresponding numeric answer. However, this paradigm can lead to numerical hallucination. Hence, we add extra domain-driven prompts and coarse-to-fine CoT to mitigate this issue.
50
- An example with the original VQA and our proposed coarse-to-fine CoT process is shown in the following figure. Meanwhile, we adopt the form of text + numbers for the labels to enhance semantic
51
  ![A data example with the original VQA compared with our coarse-to-fine CoT VQA.](./example.png)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
52
  ## Evaluation
53
 
54
  ## Examples
 
45
  | Medical Disease Grading (MDG) | APTOS | 3,662 | 5 grades |
46
  | Historical Date Estimation (HDE) | HCI | 1,325 | 5 decades |
47
 
48
+ **Important notice**: As these datasets provide only images and digital labels, they are designed with a standardized VQA paradigm by reusing their images and modifying the annotations into a textual form to enable MLLMs to undergo joint training for heterogeneous tasks of diverse domains.
49
  Specifically, each data sample originally consists of a simple question and a corresponding numeric answer. However, this paradigm can lead to numerical hallucination. Hence, we add extra domain-driven prompts and coarse-to-fine CoT to mitigate this issue.
50
+ An example with the original VQA and our proposed coarse-to-fine CoT process is shown in the following figure. Meanwhile, we adopt the form of text + numbers for the labels to enhance semantic understanding.
51
  ![A data example with the original VQA compared with our coarse-to-fine CoT VQA.](./example.png)
52
+
53
+ ### STORM Prompts
54
+ ```
55
+ <image> You are now an advanced Image Quality Evaluator, and your task is to assess the quality
56
+ of the provided image. Please evaluate the image’s quality based on a 5-rate scale: rate0(Bad),
57
+ rate1(Poor), rate2(Fair), rate3(Good), rate4(Excellent). Please provide the coarse category that can
58
+ help you answer the question better. Please first coarsely categorise the image: rate0-1(Below Fair),
59
+ rate2(Fair), rate3-4(Above Fair). Based on the coarse classification, proceed to make a final rate
60
+ prediction. The specific steps are as follows:
61
+ 1. Make the coarse prediction with the candidates:rate0-1(Below Fair), rate2(Fair), rate3-4(Above Fair).
62
+ 2. Based on the coarse classification, proceed to make a final age prediction with the candidates: rate0(Bad), rate1(Poor), rate2(Fair), rate3(Good), rate4(Excellent).
63
+ 3. Please note that the coarse thoughts and the final answer should be consistent.
64
+ Answer: [Coarse answer], [Final answer]
65
+ ```
66
  ## Evaluation
67
 
68
  ## Examples