Split (2)

train · 5.42k rows

messages listlengths 3 3
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The use Facial Action Coding System or FACS could be extremely valuable in the classroom. The amount of time students are confused on a subject or do not understand what the teacher is saying because they are moving to fast could drop tremendously if teachers could read how the student's are feeling. The teacher could know that the whole class is bored with a lesson and modify that lesson later to make it much more interesting. Knowing how the student's feel could change the classroom for the better.\n\nThroughout any student's school career there is a moment when they are confused by a subject and was forced to retreive additional help in fear of a bad grade on their upcoming test. Some students would be too shy to stop the teacher to elaborate or could not visit the teacher after class due to time constraints and forced to look up youtubes videos hours on end in order get a grasp on a subject. If the teacher knew that multiple students felt this way in their class, they could change their lesson plan to make things much more understandable for the students just as Dr. Haung predicts. The Facial Action Coding System could bridge that disconnect between teacher and student.\n\nNot only could a teacher make a subject easier to comprehend, they can also make it much more enjoyable. This technology can help a teacher know if their students are bored or not. If the teacher knows this they can make a lesson much more interesting, getting the students engaged, which leaves less heads sleeping desks. This could lead to students having more of a passion towards subjects such as math or chemistry because they are having fun with those topics. Some time if someone doe not find a subject interesting they won't try hard in that class unlike someone who does like that subject.\n\nKnowing student's emotions through this technology could change the experience of school as a whole. If teachers were to follow the readings from FACS students would be able to comprehend and enjoy a variety of subject matters, there could be much less sleeping bodies in class, and the engagement level in classrooms could skyrocket.Just only if FACS and schools cooperated to make the education system better as a whole and makes things a better experience for the student.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Overall, the Mona Lisa Smile is a nice piece of art. Do to my opinion i don't believe that the use of this technology to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is valuable.\n\nOf course this is my opinion , what i truely believe about this\n\ntopic. I don't understand how a computer can read your expression . It's really interesting to find out more about this claim !\n\nI don't believe this technology is valuable because a computer would never tell wheather someone is ahppy or not . According to the text,' For instance , you can probably tell how a friend is feeling simply by the look on her face. Of course , most of us would have trouble actually describing each facia trait that conveys happy , worried , etc.\" This clearly states that we as humans have trouble noticing others expressions or feelings. Imagine a computer noticing it more than you do . According to the text, \" A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored.\" This just means that computer will be more effecient to see you and notice whats wrong or something with you.\n\nLastly to wrap up this up , i still dont believe this technology is valuable to read student's emotional expression of students in a classroom .\n\nI personally like that , sounds cool , sounds like a good idea. I like it and all but i find it to good to be true. Everyone has there feelings always changing , you can be happy one hour , then the other , sad. Well thats my opinion about this. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In this essay in the article \" Making Mona Lisa Smile\" the author describes how a new technology called the Facial Action Coding System I was talking about how are the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is valuable.\n\nFirst on that time some computers are creating to recognice emotions, in the text say, \" Mono Lisa at least acccording to some new computer software that can recognize emotions.\" She was according that she wanted to find ways to humans express they emotions, but later the Dr. Huang was developed a betters ways to humans can be communicate with others. In the text say, \" Dr. Huag and his colleague are experts at developing better ways for humas and computers to communicate\" this mean that the Dr. Huag he is trying to find how calculate the feelings of humans and he is a expert at developing a computers that way people will be have how they communicate with others to the place and another pleace.\n\nIn addition this process begins with a cumputer 3-D this was called an \" action unit\" this is how they is trying to find how are the humans emotions. The Dr. Paul Eckman was a creator the FACS ( Facial Action Coding System) he creater this, then he classified whats are the emotions that he is trying to has. In the text say, Eckman has classified six basic emotions happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness and then associated each with characteristic of the facial muscle.\" This mean how the Dr. Paul uses this six category to see how the students express their emotions. I think that this is help us because they know when the students are sad, fear, happy , anger or samething like the Dr. Paul saids. These emotions is classified to find the emotions of people.\n\nNow the new emotion they use in people and then they compare with the real face , in the article say, \" Using video imagery, the new emtion-recognition software tracks these facial movements in a real face or in the painted face of Mona Lisa,\" and \" Each expression is compared against a neutral face\" they use videos imagery to show the emotions when they use the creation that they creater to see how are the ractions, and then they compared against the neutral face with the face that they have.\n\nAlso there is a lot ways that they have to use in emtions but not all the ways are express the same ways. Some ways that they use are bad beacuse some humans don't wanted that people know their life and another humans wanted that they help them to find their emotions because they don't know how they feel or how are their emotions.\n\nWhen they uses with students is so confused for them. Students is becoming confused how Dr. Huag predicts, in the article say, \" A classroom computer could recognized when a student is becoming confused or bored,\" Dr. Haug predicts. \" Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\" The same make computer-animated faces more expressive for video games or video surgery. \" Most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication,\" this mean that for some students are boring but fr the others students are good and they used one and other ways to recognize the emotions and finally they found and they know when the students used a lot the computers to compared animated face or something like that.\n\nIn conclusion I learn that they are different ways to humans express their emotions that is hard for the Drs. to find the emotions for recognize how humans feeling. Also this ways a lot of students use to compared their emotions with someone else. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think that a lot of people should join the seagoing cowboys, because you can save a lot of people.\n\nReasons people should join is because you can help people that are really hurt. People you help will respect you more and you will feel good about yourself. You will make a lot of new friends. You get to travel to places you never been to before.\n\nPeople will trust you more, and here are some examples. When you help someone they probaly will trust you because you helped them. If you help a persons crops they will trust you because they can eat. If you can help their animals they will trust you a lot because they have someone to play with now. Finally if you help their homes they will trust you because they have somewhere to sleep.\n\nFinally you might get rewards, and here are some examples. if you help a lot of people that town will thank you and honor you. If you want money, then the more helpful you are the more you get paid. Finally the seagoing cowboys will honer you and you might get a reward.\n\nNow do you want to join the seagoing cowboys and help a lot of people, because I hope you do, and if you do join, its really challenging. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Imagine when cars will be nothing but the future. This is actually kind of easy to imagine, but also very mind-blowing to what the future may hold, no? Well, driverless cars are future and it can only get better. They are a big advancement helpfully to our world, and I am definitely for the development they will bring to us and the world.\n\nFirst of all, driverless cars would become just like a public-transport taxi system, only better. These cars can better improve how we drive, more economically. The smart cars now only \"use half the fuel of today's taxis and offer far more flexibility than a bus\". This will help the environment greatly, because with all the pollution from old cars and diesel semi-trucks, our air quality will not be so good if we do not do something to make it better. These driverless cars will help the environment, and it will not add to the problems we have now. With the cars only getting better, the future driverless cars will only advance more as car manufacturers figure out ways to make travel easier.\n\nSecondly, the driverless car would include combinations of input to help the actual driving going on on the road. These inputs are needed to help \"mimic the skill of a human at the wheel\". What is the point in a driverless car if it has a driver? There are already cars in our world that can park by themselves and have rear cameras to help with views, but not entirely a car that can do every bit a human can do. The tyes of inputs and sensors the driverless car would have are: position sensors on wheels, sensors on the roof, a video camera for rearview mirrors, a GPS reciever, and a laser that can constantly show us a 3-D mdoel of the car's surroundings. Without all of these features, the car wouldn't be able to actually drive on its own. These sensors will help the driver, (who won't actually be driving) and the car do what it has to do to detect every movement around it.\n\nLastly, these driverless cars are a big safety improvement to our world. Safety in cars is huge in our world today because we use travel more on big, open roads and highways. Many accidents happen on the road, and when accidents happen, it can be costly and harmful to the driver, their car, and their income. While one is in the car, we always want to make sure we get to our destination without any problems. Car accidents do not happen very often to people, but it is also not entirely rare. The features of the driverless car will ensure safety while driving at all times. Many people still text and drive, which is a big concern while on the road for you and for others also driving. When you have a driverless car, you can do what you need to do, and that includes sending a text. You will have a less risk of getting into an accident. Although the \"non-driving driver\" will not have to actually put their hands on the wheel because the car does all the work, the driver still has to be focused on the road. The driver must stay attentive to his or her surroudings because if there are road hazards, the driver must come into play and actually take the wheel until the road is free of hazardous conditions. The driverless car will watch you and you will remain watching the road. It is like a team effort, even though the human only comes into play when they are needed.\n\nIn all, I am all for driverless cars and its development that comes with it. The cars will be more economical and useful to our public-transport system, the features and sensors that come with it will help the cars drive more smoothly and efficiently, and these cars will better help the world's safety crisis while in a car. Driverless cars are the future, and we are driving ourselves slowly, but surely, onto the road to a better time.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" argues why humans should research Venus, despite the difficulties that may follow. The author provides information about Venus and what makes it such a hard planet to explore, but more importantly, why that should not stop researchers and scientists. Through the author's compelling argument, readers are able to form their own opinion of whether Venus should be explored. The author supports the idea of studying Venus well by dicussing benefits, ways to avoid dangers on Venus, and future experiments, all while including strong evidence and interesting hooks to captivate the readers.\n\nAfter sharing information about Venus, the author begins to discuss the benefits of exploring the planet. The author supports their argument well by giving compelling evidence to back up their statements and opinions. It is stated in paragraph 4, \"Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system\". This quote shows the value in exploring Venus, further supporting the author's argument. The article goes on to share another compelling reason; the fact that Venus is \"our nearest option for a planetary visit\", as stated in paragraph 4. The current limitations of space travel only allow for close visits for astronauts, making Venus a compelling planet. By discussing the benefits of exploring Venus and giving evidence to support it, the author starts off their argument very strong.\n\nNext, the author shares how astronauts can get past the many dangers that Venus presents. This acts as a refutation for any arguments that claim Venus is too dangerous to explore. In paragraph 5, the author shares an idea of a blimp-like vehicle that would allow astronauts to survive. They state, \"Not easy conditions, but survivable for humans\". There are also other approaches that can be taken that the author shares. In paragraph 7, simplified electronics are discussed because of their ability to survive on Venus. This ongoing project shows that there are ways to explore Venus and that the idea is not entirely impossible. The author also brings in evidence to support their claim by sharing the science behind simplified electronics. This shows that the statements made are not false and allows for the readers to understand how the electronics work. These refuations leave no doubt for any other arguments, creating a stronger support.\n\nThe author later compels the readers with motivation and inspiration by arguing that the challenges should only bring more drive to explore the impossible. In paragraph 8, they state, \"Striving to meet the challenge presented by Venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors\". The author is able to finally bring to rest the argument that Venus is too dangerous to explore. More importantly, it also shows the emotion that the author brings into the paper. All throughout the article, the author uses many hooks in order to draw the reader in. This technique makes the article more approchable and altogether much more interesting. Discussing the value in exploring Venus allows readers to believe that humans are capable of surpassing the challenges, despite the odds. It also draws more interest in, as not all people who read the article will be interested in space or the importance of it. Even if someone who reads the article is not interested, they will at least be inspired at the end. The last sentence in the article states \"Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation\". Imagination and innovation appeal to everyone, allowing for a stronger arguement that will presuade anyone who reads the article.\n\nOverall, \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" is a very presuasive article. The paper starts off with information about Venus, drawing the reader in. The author explains the reasons why humans should not be daunted by the nature of the planet, and goes on to give evidence to support their reasons. Solutions are given in order to survive Venus' challenges in order to refute any arguments against their claims. Lastly, the author uses strong hooks and compelling arguments that appeal to anyone in order to create a persuasive article that interests the reader from beginning to end. The idea that Venus should be explored is well supported in the article, leaving no one to be against it. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author has sort of a dream of going to Venus. He claims that it is possible because they're both epual in size and similar in some areas.\n\nBesides the point Venus can reach up to extreme levels of heat from how close it is to the sun and all the fumes or carbon dioxide. Speakin of carbon dioxide majority of Venus think atmosphere is almost 97percent carbon dioxide. Reaching over 800 degrees on average, and the atmaspheris pressure is 90 times greater that what we experience on Earth, it can get pretty hot.\n\nIt makes since to try to go to Venus, because we want to know if there is anymore life out there besides Earth, it makes since, but Venus would almost be impossible for a while until we get more/better technology to travel to any other planets. We might try to go to other planets before that on because it would be impossibly to try to live or stay there. We are more likely to go to Mars before any other planet, because it is also similar to earth, but atleast it not super hot like either Venus, or Mercury.\n\nWe want to see if there are any other life out there so we want to try to go to other planets to try to see whatelse is out there, and as the author wants us to try to go to Venus, might not be possible for a while, but I think it will be possible soon. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars can be useful but distracting and dangerous in many ways here is the reason why it can be both positive and negative in peoples' lives. As it says in the text the driverless car can streer, accelerate ,and break themselves , but all are to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills , such as navigating through work zones and around accidents . There for the driverless car isnt really driverless it still needs a driver. The negative thing about this is that the driver has to remain alert what makes this car so special if it still requires you to drive it and remain alert. why would anyone want a driverless car that still needs a driver?The\n\ndriverless car is helpful becuase it can alert you when you need to be. the car is dangerous becuase all of the extra gadets turn off as soon as you take control of the car , in this case it can confuse the driver and they may get into a crash. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "It is hard to imagine car-free or car limiting cities, but it could happen in the near future. Many people like owning and driving cars. However, cars are causing major problems in some areas of the world, so we could see less cars in the future.\n\nOne of the biggest issues that cars cause is the carbon emissions that they release. In America, the second largest source of emissions are from cars (Source 4). This doesnt' seem like an issue to Americans, but in places like Beijing, China, which is one of the most polluted cities in the world (Source 2), emissions are very harmful. Citizens of Beijing have to wear mask when they walk around the city so that they don't get sick or poisoned from the carbon emissions. Even a 1st world country, like France, had carbon emissions that rivaled Beijing(Source 2). So as you can see, the emissions that cars give off could become a more serious issue in America, especially if you live in a place like New York City. If more cities become less congested, they will be much safer.\n\nSpeaking of New York City, cars are already a big issue. If you have been to New York City, you should know that the streets are so congested with traffic that it is faster to walk or ride a bike to get around the city. Not only are the streets congested, the air is very polluted from the emissions given off by cars. However, in Vauban, Germany, residents are giving up their cars for streets that are mostly \"car-free\" (Source 1). Few residents own cars and that means that the streets are quiet and clear and greenhouse emission have drastically decreased. Residents say that they are happier without cars and eaverything they need is within walking distance (Source 1). This could quite possibly be what happens to many cities and suburbs in the near future.\n\nThe last thing that I would like to fill you in on is that car ownership in America has been steadily declining. Research has shown that the number of young peole driving has decreased by 23 percent between 2001 and 2009 (Source 4). Because of this, many people use Public Transport to get where they need to go. This is likely due to the fact that many Americans don't have the money to buy cars, so they don't make it a priority (Source 4). Also, young people feel less inclined to drive because they can connect with their friends through the internet (Source 4).\n\nBy no means am I saying that you should not own a car, I'm am just explaining to you that a car-limited future is looking more and more possible. In many ways it could be very beneficial, but it still has a long way to go before I can see it becoming reality. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"The Evening Star\", is one of the brightest points of the light on the sky at night. Venus is a planet, Also Venus is the second planet\n\nfrom the sun. Venus is a simple to see from the distant but safe vantage point on Earth. It proved that a very challeging place to examine more closely on Earth. It is reffered to Earths twin. Venus is also the closeset planet to Earth and has density and size.\n\nEarth, Venus, and Mars, are neighbors because they are close to each other. They all have different speeds around the sun. These difference mean that we are closer to Mars and the other times to Venus. Venus is right around the corner from space,In space terms. None of the spacecraft survied the landing for more than a few hours. 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets in Venus. It is challeging because the clouds are highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venu's atomsphere. The temperatures average over 800 degrees. The atmosphere pressure is 90 times greater that we experince on our planet. The conditions our more extreme than anything humans encounter on our Earth. There is many metals on the Earth. Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been most of Earth like planet in our solar system. Venus was covered largely with oceans and could have supported in various forms. The planet is very rocky and includes familiar features.\n\nNasa has a humans studing Venus. Venus would allow scientist's to float above the fray. temperaures would still be hot\n\nand around\n\n170 degrees Fahrenheit. The air pressure would be close to the sea level on Earth. The Solar power would be plentiful, and radiation would not exceed Earth levels. The conditions are not easy but the humans can still live from it. orbiting or hovering safety far above the planet can provide inly limited insight on the ground conditions because it forms of the light. More importantly, researchers cannot take samples of the rocks or gas. Scientist\"s seeking a conduct a through mission to understand the Venus.\n\nThere is many things in space that we all still don't know obout. Scientist's are trying to find new things about the planets and Earth. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars can be a bad thing and a good thing for the world. Driverless cars would be a bad idea when it comes to the saftey of people. Driverless cars could also be a good thing for the econmy and earth.\n\nDriverless cars would not be such a good idea just because you dont really know if the technology is actually gonna work and be safe for people. Most technology if not all technology have probles sometimes. Just think of a car driving its self down the road and all of the sudden something goes wrong with the car and the car causes and accident where a few poeple got hurt or die. If something like this happens whos fault is it? The person in the vehicle or the people who desighned the vehicle?\n\nWe've been creating computer driven cars that also have a feature that the driver in the vehivle can take over and control the vehivle at any time. Apple reciently is making a car that drives its self but can also be driven by a person controling the vehicle. In my opinion thats ten times safer than a car that drives on it own. Most newer cars these days have features like Antilock breaking systems or sencors that make a vehicle back into an area or parking spot on its own. Ford Reacenlty came out with a truck that back itself up to hook onto a traler insted of the driver having to do it. During this period of the truck hooking to a traler by its self the driver has an option to use that feature or do it manualy.\n\nIn this passage it talks about BMW having a car with a feature called Traffic Jam Assistance witch is that the car can handle driving functions at speeds up to 25 mph, and it also has special touch sencors to make sure the driver keeps ahold of the steering wheele and is alert during this time.\n\nAs of right now I dont belive we have and cars that copletely drive them selfs, but alot of newer cars these days have features that can help assist you in stituations when needed. Some cars stop on there own if your getting to close to another vehicle and the driver is not paying attention. Those are the type of vehivles we need. We dont need cars that can drive themselfs that coud have something go wrong with the car and cause a reck or endager lifes. Even in some states it is illegal to test computer driven cars. I wonder why? It's probably becase they might not be sucha good idea.\n\nNow there are positives to drivelss cars. People would save money by not having to buy or use there cars when they have cars that can drive them around. The driveless cars would be good on gas so money would be saved on gas. Also not using much gas is good for our enviorment because it would be less polution to the earth if everyone started switching to using driveless cars. I think there are more negatives in this situation then positives.\n\nTo sum all of this up Im not sure if drivless cars are sucha good idea or ever will be a good idea untill later in the future after the technology has been tested for many of years and advanced to the fullest to where it has the capability of hadling a driveless car. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars are one of the main accomplishments modern technology has been able to achieve. I believe they will become a cornerstone of computer science on which many other projects will build upon. Although these cars pose a few problems, the possible benefits far outweigh the possible flaws. The myriad uses of computers is rising rapidly, and these excellent pieces of machinery will contribute to their number in the future.\n\nDriving cars can be a somewhat dangerous endeavor. There are multiple distractions that can cause the driver to make a potentially fatal error, chief among them being cellular devices and alcohol. With computer driven cars, both of these issues are nonexsistent. Due to the hands-free nature of computer-driven cars, the ability to use cell phone while being in the driver's seat becomes feasible. Also, computer drivers don't get drunk or distracted by their surroundings as human drivers would. Computers are primarily more efficient than the average human at calculations in math, memorization, and pattern-finding. The same applies to a computer's ability to drive compared to a human being. At this point in time, cars are not completely driven by computers, but they rather assist the person driving with features such as automatically braking, sensing potentially dangerous incoming objects from all direction, and detecting road signs. The technology is beginning to reach a level of dexterity in which they will be able to take complete control of the car, which will ultimately lead to a decrease in car accidents.\n\nAs I stated in the introduction, there are a miniscule number of cons regarding these vehicles, none of which permanently hindering the progress of these cars. One prominent argument withing the prompt is the idea that the technology could malfunction and harm the passengers. However, the way computers work as of the creation of a quicly accessable internet is that many updates are sent to them via networking. This means that the cars can receive a stream of updates for whatever flaws were not ironed out by the companies' rigorous testing process prior to launch, these flaws most likely being few and far in between. Another common issue is that there still needs to be some driver input depending on the situation. This driver input is for the overall safety and integrity of the vehicle. However, as this technology matures and becomes more efficient and consistent, the car will be able to make decisions about the road better than its human counterpart could. The final issue I would like to address is that cell phones or other portable devices not specifically meant for use with the car can not be turned off by the car. Firstly, if the car is self-sustaining, there would be no need to turn off other electronic devices. Secondly, in the event that the vehicle did need to alert the driver while using a cell phone, there are a plethora of methods the car could get the driver's attetion, including, but not limited to: vibrating the seat, making an alert noise with the cars internal speakers, connecting the cell phone in use to the car with an application that has wireless communications access and send an alerts via the aforementioned app.\n\nThese cars are rapidly progressing in their ability to handle situations that could befall the road. If everyone begins using these driverless cars, the cars could communicate with each other and gain information from one another, making car accidents and illegal driving behaviors a thing of the past. This technology is evolving rapidly, and it will only continue moving forwards in consistency.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author explain how there is a posobility that people can still study about thing that they are never going to see in person, it is worth t to study Venus right now even if you can't acually go and see it with your eyes at least you're going to know a lot of thing about it. The author talks about porbably getting hurt if you try to get close to it but you can still find so many ways to get to it.\n\nSome evidence from the text that you can use that tell you that it can be good to study about Venus is in paragraph 4 says, \"Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth like planet in our solar system. Long ago, Venus was orobably coveres largelt with oceans and could have supported various forms of life,just like Earth\". These sentences just describs how they are actually talking about it and letting people know that it's fine to find knew thing just earth. We never thought earth was going to be save but we still came and learned a lot of it through out the years. Another reason why i chose these quotes was because it tells you that you havetokeep looking and finding knew thing all the time.\n\nAnother example from the text on why we should keep studdying knew this is in paragraph 7 it says, These devices were first envisioned in the 1800s and plays an important role in the 1940s world war 2\". This sentence just shows how they knew that by just studying and learning new thngs everything. In conclusion the author is right we should all keep studying new things all the time. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Imagine walking up to a computer and having it tell you your emotions at that very moment. Sounds pretty futuristic right? Well, its not. Prof. Thomas Huang, of Beckingham institute has developed a machine that reads your emotions.\n\nI believe this machine is not valuable. I dont see the point in having a computer to tell me someone elses emotions. I believe that as a human I should be sociable enough to ask the person how they are feeling or just use my judgement skills to asess how they are feeling. The computer program is genious and I believe it would be very practical to use it on old photos to find out how the person was feeling, but not on modern day, living people.\n\nImagine having someone come up to you and stick a camera in your face just to try and tell what your emotions are. I feel as though I would get very annoyed and then that would show on the computer. The coputer program reads facial muscles and expressions so you could honestly trick the machine if you moved the right muscles.\n\nIn the story the computer program reads Mona Lisas face and records her mood at the time the painting was drawn. I think this is a genious idea to try and find out what dead people were feeling but we as a society should not have to rely on a computer program to have to try and tell us other peoples emotions.\n\nI also believe that it would not be a good thing if it were installed on your computer. In the article it talks about if it were installed on your comouter and an ad pops up and you frown at the ad, it will not show the ad anymore it will just show you a different topic on the next ad. I believe this is pointless because no matter what the ad is no one is going to enjoy seeing that annoyong little box pop up in the middle of your screen for something youre never going to buy. Even if it is an ad you want to watch, you might be having a bad day or you might just be tired, so if the computer reads your facial expression its automatically going to think youre in a bad mood because of the ad. So then this ad you like seeing is never going to show up again because the computer relates your bad mood to that one ad.\n\nIn conclusion I believe that the program, as brilliant as it is, is pointless for us in todays society. Smart phones have already dulled peoples senses and have drawn them away from face to face talks and just spending time with each other. Sometimes if you have a friend thats upset they want you to go talk to them about it, not shove a camera in their face to find out that they're 87% sad. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Necessity of Driverless Cars\n\nDriverless cars have been considered future technology and a distant dream for quite some time. However, due to advancements in technology, something that had only been seen in science fiction has become part of the present. I am for driverless cars, and believe that they are the next step in making roads safer for pedestrians and passengers alike.\n\nWhile driverless cars have been around for a long time, as the article also states, they are currently a work in progress. I believe that driverless cars are the key to decreasing the number of accidents on the road; if there isn't a driver to be distracted, then there should be a lower chance of problems occuring on the road. Common causes of accidents on the road would be eliminated, such as drunk driving, texting while driving, and just simple absentmindedness. Due to the sensors and computer hardware and software, the car itself would be able to sense other cars and make driving safer. Since cars are machines, they wouldn't be subject to human folly either, and would solely be focused on driving its passengers to the designated location. GPS receivers also eliminate the problem with getting lost, and as such, I firmly believe that driverless cars will benefit humans and be a large step forward in public transportation. Driverless cars are, while still under development, able to drive as well as a human, and are equipped with the necessary electronics to sense obstacles and prevent accidents on the road.\n\nThe merits of driverless cars are not entirely limited to their sensors and programming. Inside of the car, with advanced technology, there's much more entertainment to be had. New inner displays offer up bigger screens and allow for the passenger to do something productive whilst not driving. This especially aids those who constantly get texts and calls, since they can now answer those texts and calls without fear of an accident. Additionally, the inner displays of the car can not only be used as entertainment, but to do productive work as well. Driving can be a quite tedious chore to do, especially during long car rides, and, moreoften than not, there are more productive things to be done. If the car drives itself, then the passenger inside is able to do much more than just sit and twiddle their thumbs, they can get ahead or finish up papers for work. This sort of technology gives people more time to whatever they so desire, and since time is so limited anyways, this can only be a good thing.\n\nAlthough driverless cars take care of many of the problems that society has on the road today, I also think that there should be an override option in driverless cars. Perhaps in the future, when technology has advanced enough, there won't need to be an option for human interference, but as things are now, some situations call for cognitive ability. Driverless cars are automated programs, and as such, won't recognize spontaneous occurences, such as a child running out in front of the car. This is why I believe that back up functions should be implemented, such as the driver's seats which vibrate when the vehicle is in danger mentioned in the article, in order to keep everyone safe. Thus, I believe that the passengers have an obligation to, at the very least, be aware of their surroundings. However, it must also be noted that the merits outweigh the risks, and even the best technology is prone to an odd mishap.\n\nIn terms of public safety and technological advances, driverless cars are undeniably a step forward. Not only do they reduce the chance for roadside accidents, but they also allow the passengers inside to get more work done or relax. Despite being new technology, driveless cars already offer a plethora of new opportunities to people, and as such, can only keep society on an uphill climb in terms of technological advancements and wisdom.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Venus, often referred to as Earth's sister planet, is a very Earth-like, but harsh place. The atmosphere itself is made up of 97 percent carbon dioxide. The clouds contain highly corrosive sulfric acid. On top of all of that the temperatures reach 800 degrees Fehrenheit on average, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greeater than that of Earth's. Despite all of these dangerous elements, Venus should still be studied. The author of this passage thinks that studying Venus is a good idea, but doesn't give enough information to back it up.\n\nThe author of this passage thinks Venus being studied is a good idea, but at some points it is hard to tell. They do a good job of listing facts and what Venus is like. The author makes many claims that it would be a great idea, but doesn't do a good job on backing them up, making it hard to tell if they are for Venus being studied or against it. They bring up the point that NASA is working on an idea that would allow humans to survey Venus, a blimp-like spacecraft would carry them and the researchers could have a view of the ground. They then go on to say that this idea would be dangerous. They had previously stated that the atmosperic pressure is 90 times greater than Earth's and that submarines that had been built for the lowest depths of our oceans would be crushed instantly. If this is true, then wouldn't the spacecraft be crushed as well? The author counters this point before even stating it. It makes it difficult to believe that they support the idea of exploring Venus or not.\n\nThey also point out that the temperatures average 800 degrees Fahrenhiet, and would easily melt most metals. In the case of the blimp the hull that holds the reseachers would have to be metal to be able to withstand the weight of them. The author also fails to give examples of what metals those temperatures can melt. With that being said, what metals would the reseachers be able to use for the hull? If the metal melts at this temperature the researcher will die, but even if it doesn't metal melt who's to say that it won't get too hot and cause the researchers to overheat? There are many variables that play into this and the author fails to point them out.\n\nThe author's second note of Venus was the clouds that contain highly corrosive sulfuric acid. If the clouds were to release this acid wouldn't the acid eat through the blimp? What could the reseachers use to prevent the acid from eating through the blimp? Once again the author fails to tell us what could be done. They also state that there are frequent lightning storms. If the blimp gets hit by these storms, there isn't much that can protect the researchers at that point. Whether it be the lightning storms or the acid rain the blimp would not be able to withstand either one of them and it would go down easily.\n\nIn conclusion the author does a poor job of supporting the idea of researching and exploring Venus. They fail to provide enough evidence to show that it would be a good idea. The author gives the reader plenty of facts about Venus, but then those facts completely counter the idea that we should explore Venus. Making their claim of the exploration of Venus being a good thing, hard to agree with. If more claims with facts to back up the statement the author gave were given it would be more clear the author is for the exploration and it would be easier to agree with them.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Diverless cars are something people have only been imagining and seeing in movies for a while. Now with all the technology and expeirence manufuntioners have, a diverless car may be something that can actually be done. Sergey Brin, a Google cofounder, envisions a future that could use diverless cars everyday and even believes it can change the world forever. Autonomous cars have been undergoing this picture since 2009. Yet these cars are not yet completely driverless; they are on the way of becoming just that.\n\nSo really imagine being able to be driven around constantly without ever having to do your part. These cares would be able to use half the fuel that modern taxi cabs use and offer a lot more than any street bus. With the help of sensors the car is able to do much more on it's own. BMW project manager, Dr.Werner Huber even quotes \"We have to interpret the driving fun in a new way.\" Which does make the car seem as if it would be a fun way to change. You'd be able to do so much more on your way to places and have much more time to get things finished.\n\nEven though the car does seem like a very good idea to have; there are still many downfalls about this. First thing off is that the car would be way to expensive to ever make, let alone sell. With the amount of sensors and cameras that would have to be set up, the price would be too much for any middle class person to afford. The cars would also still need astiance from a driver and are not really self driven all the way. A major factor in problems that has been arrisen is safety, which seems to be the biggest one yet. Who would be blamed in the sense of an accident? The car or the person inside? Laws would also have to be changed and alterd and it is even illegal to test these cars out in certain states of the US.\n\nAll in all it's clear that the cons out weigh all the pros. There are too many problems and too many risks. An outlook from a teenagers point of view is that the car seems like it would not last. People driving them selves is scary enough now a days, let alone some robot or sensor drive around. Safety is the biggest part of it and driverless cars seem very unsafe. The promt also fails to mention anything about speed limits or signs such as one ways or no turns on right warnings. Since it is never brought up in the promt has it been brought to mind at all yet? Diverless cars just seem way to unrealiable and unrealistic for the time being of now.\n\nSo maybe in the future the driverless cars will be something so safe and affordable for everyone to be driving around in one. As of now though this tranportation system does not seem realiable enough or needed to be made into something real. Manufunctioners will proceed to make the autonomous car better and safer until the time is right to let the cars be out. Right now it's not the best idea to have the cars but eventually in our future it would be a big part in our society. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "We all hide our emotions at one point or another but, what if we had the technology that could detect whatever were feeling despite if were trying to hold them in or not. The Facial Action Coding System or FACS is just that piece of technolgy that is capable of detecting any given emotion. Dr. Huang inventor of this software has even modified it to were it can find out any emotion or emotions all at once. It's been questioned should this kind of technolgy be used in classrooms for students. The Facial Action Coding System is valuable to students in the classroom because, if any student is having troubles on the actvity at hand the Facial Action Coding System could detect that modify the prompt and make it easier for the student to then understand. Second, this software could help you better understand someone and their well-being being able to see exactly what's making them happy and what's making them upset. Third, it's better way for human and computers to \"communicate or interact\".\n\nAnybody couldn't say that they haven't had problems understanding something at any given point in time. Simpily because, everyone can't understand everything right away with no problem/obstacle getting in the way weither it being how the words are phrased or if the vocabulary is too hard to comprehend. FACS could solve this issue right away. As presented in the passage \"Dr. Huang predicts, then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor,\" therefore making it easier for the student or user to understand what is being asked or written. Solving probems much quicker than the instrustor could explaining the information piece by piece.\n\nUnderstanding emotions when communicating with someone is key. Yet, we might not recognize all that are being distrubed to us. Another great reason for FACS to come into play. As stated in the passage \"you can probably tell how a friend is feeling simply by the look on her face. Of course, most of us would have trouble actually describing each facial trait that conveys happy, worried, etc.\" This is all very true we can't comprehend every emotion that's more dull or hidden. So why don't we get a little help at recognizing more emotions. With FACS we can better understand someones true feelings inside and their well-being. This can than lead to possibly help solving some of the persons unsolved issues and other \"troubling thoughts.\" Helping them become of the better verison of themselves.\n\nIn our generation today technolgy is something that we live and breath. It's important that we become familair with technolgy and being able to use it properly and effectifly. \"Huang and his colleague are experts at developing better ways for human and computers to communicate.\" Now isn't this perfect? Huang can help us better understand computers and help computers better understand us. If students will be using computers 24/7 why not have the proper setup for them. If the software gets used in the way it's meant to it can overall have a positive effect towards the situation. After some time the computer can develop how the student or user works and operates and what they can understand and can not. Having a large postitive impact. Greater increasing the student's grades, confidence, and potentional in class. Allowing them to fully understand the content be covered better than they would ever before.\n\nIn conculsion, the Facial Action Coding System or FACS is valuable in the students classroom because, it can modify the content of the information to be better understood. Being able to see and recognize more emotions for peers. Lastly it can help the user better \"communicate\" with the computer. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "There are many advantages to having a car. such as being able to go drive places with your friends or even driving across the country, but there are also a lot of down sides to a car. such as paying for gas money, paying for ensurens, or even paying for the car its self.\n\nIf you happen to live at the beach or in the city there is really no reason for a car. Almost every thing at the beach or in a high populated city is either within walking, biking, or busing distance. This way you save money and you can get a good exercise.\n\nAlso polution is very bad in the world today. In france dieseles make up 67 percent of vehicles. which dieseles are known as the most poluting vehicles/gas in the world.\n\nThe day without cars campaign that began in bogota in the mid-1990's was a great idea! I think that america should adopt this campaign and put it in to action. This \"day without cars\" would not only cut down polution and get people out side execising, but could also even save life that could have been taken due to car accedents or people geting hit by drunk drivers while walking.\n\nSo those are just some of the reasons why I encourage limiting car usage and promoting alternitive choices for transportation. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author suggests the idea of studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents.To begin, the author has some ideas on how we should study Venus but doesn't say how going out and exploring it will affect humans.According to the article,\"On the planet's surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet \" This means that the heat in Venus isn't very safe for humans or any object to stay in and the pressure is 90 times greater.Those who disagree might claim , there are more to explore in Venus and their coud be some kind of creature living in the planet even though it is very hot for someone to live that long in Venus.Despite these claims even though Venus has it's similarites to earth the high pressure and heat,Venusiaan geology and weather present additional impediments like erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequent lighting strikes to probes seeking land on it's surface.Furthermore,the author gives some reasoning towards why studying Venus is a good idea, he/she says that if we can find a way to live in venus then we should since Venus is the most Earth-like planet and we should have no problem living there since their so alike.\n\nIn Conclusion,The author's suggestion has some good evidence supporting his idea but putting those who will go out to visit Venus\n\nare risking there life due to it's high temperture and pressure knowing they won't find anything and it being to dangerous to have the human society living there and not taking the problems that Venus has and to know that Venus isn't similar to Earth at all.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Do not fix it if it is not broken. Cars are one of the most advanced pieces of technology humans have ever created. Why would one try to tamper with it and make them driverless? This will create more issues with drivers and their safety. Driverless cars should not be developed because they can malfunction at anytime, it will create lazy drivers, and it will cause disputes between drivers and manufacturers.\n\nDriving without lifting a finger may sound like paradise, however there are many malfunctions the car could undergo. For example, it could be a heavy thunderstorm while one is driving down a 80 mph highway. Large amounts of water flood the sensors that apply the breaks and they suddenly go out. The driver would have no idea, and when it comes to time to stop, the car will keep going. This will cause a major crash injury or even killing several people. According to passage 9 of Driverless Cars Are Coming, \"Presently, traffic laws are written with the assumption that the only safe car has a human driver in control at all times.\" It should be kept that way.\n\nDriverless cars can and will malfunction. However, who is to blame? This leaves two choices, the driver or the manufacturer. Since the cars created by the manufacturers are supposed to be driverless, then one may believe that the blame goes towards the manufacterurs. On the contrary, the manufacturers made it known that there are some tasks that humans must do in the vehicle. This could cause disputes between the manufacterurs and the drivers. Unless the driver is honest, the law will not know if the manufacterurs should be pressed with charges or not. As a result numerous trials in court will be made giving the driver and the manufacturing company a plethora frustrations. All this can be avoided by avoiding drvierless cars.\n\nThe word \"driverless\" is not exaclty true. According to passage 7 of Driverless Cars Are Coming, \"...none of the cars develpoed so far are completely driverless.\" This indicates that there are still some tasks that humans must do. However, if the driver gets used to barely doing anything at all behind the wheel, then they wont pay attention to when they need to apply themselves. Driverless cars will give drivers more time to text, talk on the phone, and other personal activities when they are supposed to be watching to road incase they need to take the wheel. This could create traffic, car wrecks, and even trouble between drivers and the law. No one likes traffic tickets and hospital bills, so no one needs a driverless car.\n\nIn conclusion, driverless cars are dangerous and should not be developed. Driverless cars should not be developed because they can malfunction at anytime, it will create lazy drivers, and it will cause disputes between drivers and manufacturers. Hopefully driverless cars will never be developed because face it, the open road already has too many problems. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "As a student, if I don't understand something in class, I will ask someone about it. Whether that is a teacher, a student, or a parent there is almost always someone who knows. If any one of these reliable sources does not know, I can most likely look it up on one of my devices that has the internet. If we were to introduce the new FACS technology, it may have unindended lasting impacts which could be detrimental to our society.\n\nIt was mentioned in the passage on paragraph 6 that \" 'A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored. Then it could modiy the lesson, like an effective human instructor.' \"\n\nThe first reason that it could be bad for our society as a whole is that it is not the computer's duty to explain how to do everything and to change to our will. While computers were made to help us, it cannot be our only source of information. On the other hand, teachers are st school for the sole purpose of helping you learn. It is their actual job to be there to help you learn things. While computers are a tool to help achieve this goal, there are other ways to learn about things and get them explained to you.\n\nWhen you are in highschool, many teachers and parents will say things to you along the lines of \"In the real world\" and \" Highschool is preparing you for the real world\". Later on in life, \"in the real world\", if you get bored at a job you cannot just change what you are doing. You have to continue on with it because it is your job. If we implemented this system now in schools, many kids and teens would get in their mindset that if they are bored or don't understand something, things will change for them. Kids should not rely on a computer to help them understand everything. There are teachers, classmates, parents, and other adults who can help.\n\nThe second reason why this could be bad for our society is the accessibility. Not every school has computers and not every class uses them. If we were to implement this software, it could be giving an unfair advantage to the students who had acsess to it. There are still plenty of schools that may not have a computer in every classroom. Similarly, not all students and parents can afford this kind of technology. Because of how new and high-tech this software is it most likely will cost more money to be put into effect. This would cause the schools with more money to be able to get it while the schools with less funding and less money to be pushed aside and not get it. This causes the students at the schools that cannnot afford it to have a disadvantage.\n\nThe third and final reason why this could be bad for our society as a whole is simply that people may become less sensitive to reading other peoples emotions. Without needing to have face- to- face human interactions to see how people are feeling, it could result in a decline of being able to recognize emotions in facial expressions.\n\nI learned a few chords on the ukulele this summer. I could piece together a song or two. Now after a few months, I can't remember the first thing about playing those chords. This example shows that if you learn something then don't do it for an extended period of time, it will take a while to relearn how to do it. Although reading emotions is nothing like playing ukulele, the same holds true; if you learn something, and rely on something else to help you do it, it is going to be hard for you to re-learn how to do it again.\n\nPeople also have a right to privacy and some people may not enjoy those particular rights being breached. I am a person who does not let all of my emotions show. Other people may bottle these feelings up in hopes that nobody will see. If people want to keep in how they feel, they should be able to do that as it is what they want.\n\nBecause it is not the computers duty to exlain everything to you, not everyone has accsess to this kind of software, and people may lose their sensitivity to the fine art of emotion reading, I am in opposition of implementing this FACS technology. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driveless cars should be allowed for use. driveless cars are the near future and, helping us as a human race to take a big leap and advance to make something bigger and better.\n\nIn paragragh 1 it states \"He believes such cars would functually change the world.\" Which many people would respond with 'how so?' In many situations if a person is phisically hurt or in an instance wehre they casnt alwasy watch the road a driveless car could help and, still keep you protected. Although they have yet to make a full driveless car, the people at Google and many other places, are still looking for a solution. \"Some manufacturers hope to do that by bringing in-car entertainment and information systems that use heads-up displays. Such displays can be turned off instantly when the driver needs to take over---Something not available to drivers trying to text with a cell phone. In this way, the in-car system is actually a safty feature, and safty is a big concern.\" In this quote, you can see how the car will be designed so that the user can do things they have never done in a car before while still being safe behind the wheel. The features the car has such as special touch sensors and the ability to alert the person when they are needing to take the wheel while driving are also there to keep the driver safe. Now a days safter behing the wheel is a big concern expecially for teens texting and driving, but with the driveless car Google and many otheres are trying to make, they can reduce the number. \"Something not available to drivers trying to text with a cell phone.\"\n\nNot only will driveless cars safe and help people, if will also save fuel which saves gas. And, many people know oil is a big thing. The more oil you have and can produce the more money you can have. But the tricky thing about oil is that one day it will run out and it will take years on end to make again because oil is not reasourseable. In paraghaph 1, it states \"The car he inforesees would use half the fuel of todays taxis and offer far mor flexibility than a bus.\" Due to less fuel being used, more will be saved to use later. Which will give us have the time before all of it is gone. This also means that people would safe money because gas would cost less to fill a full tank of gas for a car.\n\nIn conclution, the driveless car is an appropriate accessory for the future . It keeps otheres safe around unsafe places. The car will also most likely reduce deaths behind the wheel by giving out warnings to the driver and keeping he and or she alert and ready. Also, many people would safe money because the price of gas would be low due to gas usage reduction.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the story \"A Cowboy Who Rode the Waves\" Luke joins the Seagoing Cowboy program.\n\nIn this story it talks about what Luke does on his journey so, this is what were are going to talk about.\n\nIn paragraph 1 it says Luke's friend Don Reist invited Luke to go with him to the Seagoing Cowboy program and Luke did not turn the offer down because that was an opportunity of a lifetime.\n\nIn paragraph 4 it said that\n\nLuke turned 18 before arriving in Greece, which ment he could be drafted for military service.\n\n\"When my drafy board learned that I was on a cattle-boat trip, they told me to just keep doing that for my service.\"\n\nBy the time he was discharged in 1947, Luke made nine trips-the most of any Seagoing Cowboy.\n\nIn paragraph 5 there were some reasons he should join the Seagoing Cowboys, and it said \"The cattle-boat trips were an unbelievable opportunity for a small-town boy,\" he says.\n\n\"Besides helping people, I had the side benefit of seeing Europe and China.\n\nBut seeing the Acropolis in Greece was special,\"\n\nhe says. \"So was taking a Gondala ride in Venice, Italy, a city with streets of water.\"\n\nLuke also toured an excavated castle in Crete and marveled at the Panama Canal on his way to China.\n\nIn paragraph 7 the way Luke's claim supported the outcome of the story.\n\nHelping out on his aunt Katie's farm as a boy had prepared Luke for hard work, but not for the dangers at sea.\n\nOn his second trip, Luke served as night watchman.\n\nHis job was to check on all the animals every hour.\n\nOne rainy night, after making his hourly report to the captain, he slid down a slippery ladder on his backside.\n\nLuke's heart raced as he shot feet first toward an opening on the side of the ship.\n\nA small strip of metal along the edge stopped his slide, keeping him from flying overboard into the dark Atlantic.\n\nHe was happy to be alive.\n\nBut he could not work for a couple days because of cracked ribs.\n\nMy conclusion of the story is in paragraph 9 when it says, But being a Seagoing Cowboy was much more than an adventure for Luke Bomberger.\n\nIt opened up the world to him.\n\n\"I am grateful for the opportunity,\" he says.\n\n\"It made me more aware of people of other countries and their needs.\"\n\nAnd that awareness stayed with him, leading his family to host a number of international students and exchange visitors for many years.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Base on what I read Venus is a important planet it is the second from the sun and it's nickname is the evening star and is one of the brightest points of light in the night. Also in this passage I found out Venus is also dangerous and is referred to as Earth's twin. Venus is simple to see from the distant but safe vantage point of earth.\n\nVenus is the closest planet to earth in terms of density and size and occasionally the closest in distance too. However on planet Venus the surface,temperatures average over 800 degrees fahrenheit and and also atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than waht we experience on our own planet.\n\nA long time ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life just like Earth. The NASA is working on other approaches to studying Venus.\n\nThis passage was helpful learning more about Venus like how hot it is and how big and what the NASA is doing to study it. But I don't think I could live on Venus it wouldn't be safe because of the pressure,heat and other bad forces. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Using this technology in a classroom could be helpful in alot of ways. One main way is that the computer could tell if your becoming confused and adjust the course in whichever way it needs to be changed. This would be extrememly helpful in the long run because it would make learning alot easier for students. One of the few downsides to this program would be the cost of it because not all schools would be able to afford the new program. This would give some schools an unfair advantage when it comes to learning processes. Overall the schools that wouldn't be able to afford the program would lose more students because they would want to be at a school with this program.\n\nIf every school would be able to have this program it would be a smart investment but not every school has the funding to buy the program. The schools with less funding would be able to get a few but not many computers that can handle the program. While the bigger schools with more funding would become even bigger because they would be able to get enough computers for everyone.\n\nThe program could also help in ways of monitoring the students mood so if the student is angry or sad the lesson could change to something to make the student happy. If the students were to become confused the lesson could notify a teacher and the teacher could explain it to the student. The program could also change the lesson to be at an easier pace for the student if needed.\n\nThe way the program reads the facial expression is unique in the fact that most people haven't been exposed to that kind of technology yet. But overall how much would it cost to get a computer that can handle the program and how much does the program itself cost? these are questions that need to be answered as well.\n\nThat is why i think that the program is a good idea but it might not be accessable for every student around the world. Other than not everyone being able to get the program it would enhance the students learning pace greatly. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Electoral College is a system that should no longer be used because it is based on an outdated system from the first years of our country's independence. It would be much more beneficial to use the popular vote as the final vote. One reason is that one canidate can get more votes, but still lose the election! Another is that many states never get to see the potential president speak, as to make their descion. Lastly voting would be easier to count and to understand for citizens and those who work the election.\n\nIn 2000, the electoral college failed to properly represent our country's people. More people voted for Al Gore, but Bush still won the election. In the states where Bush did win, it made the people who voted for Al Gore insignificant and their votes would never again be considered. Even if in every state a paticular canidate won by one vote, that person would still get every electoral vote, because they won the state, this is mostly an issue in large states. This is unfair to the losing canidate because their voters never really got a chance. If it was a popular vote, voting would be much more direct and easier to understand. Citizens might even be unaware that they aren't really voting for the president, they are voting for their electoral college representative. With popular vote, there would be no more confusion, and no more worrying about comparing the two voting methods.\n\nAnother reason is that some states may never get a chance to see their potential president speak. Potential presidents tend to go speak in swing states, or states that may vote either for them or for their opponent, since it is based on the states vote not the individual people. When a president goes to speak in a swing state they are convincing people that it will be a better choice to vote for them, not the other canidate. If somebody lived in Rhode Island, for example, they would never get the chance to see their potential president speak, therefore they would have to make their descion based on television speeches, newspaper articles, etc.\n\nAlso states that tend to vote one way or another often do not get visited because there is no point in trying to convince a state to vote for you that is definitley already going to vote you, to vote for you, and vice versa. Swing states with high populations are really the only states that are visited. It is no promise that the potential president will go to every state or even every region, but they will more likely than not visit different states than they would have before. If popular vote decided who would become president, it likely would no longer be true for presidents to only visit swing states.\n\nLast, the entire election process would be much more simplistic. There would be a whole group of people who no longer would have to be a part of the process, and the less people, the less mistakes. Also each state could still add up their votes, then add all the state's votes together and voila, the president has been chosen, by the people. There would be no more arguments as to who really won the election, as in popular vote versus electoral college. Also there would be much less of a chance for a tie, the more numbers the less each number is worth. Overall, the electoral college adds unecessary complications to a potentially simple system.\n\nThe popular voting system would still be difficult to take care of, but much better than the previous system, the despised electoral college. Throughout the years we have seen twice where our course of history could have been radically changed, with a different president. The popular vote system would increase the power of the people, allow more people to see the president speak, and get rid of unecessary complications and confusion of the electoral college. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article the author suggests that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it represents. Studying Venus is a difficult challenge that NASA is trying to achieve. NASA is trying to create an aircraft that will last long in venus's environment conditions. They have a aircraft that is made out of silicon carbide that will last about 3 weeks.\n\nNASA\n\nand other scientist believe that venus was once like earth, they believed that there was once water and living oganisms. Due to the planet being so close to the sun, and the sun being as hot as it is the temperature of the planet is average 800 degrees fahrenheit. The planet now has a rocky sediment, valleys, mountians, and craters.\n\nAlso from the planet being so hot the aircrafts that had been made for venus wouldn't last very long. The atmospheric pressure is 90 time greater than what we experence on our own planet. The aircraft must be strong enought to support itself and not be crushed. \"even a submariene accustomed to diving in the deepest parts of our oceans would be crushed and would liquefy many metals.\n\nNot only is venus very hot and has a greater atmospheric pressure, the weather and natural diasters are dangerous. Venus often has \"erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequent lightning strikes to probes seeking to land on it's surface.\"\n\nGoing to venus would be a very diffuicult for scientist to achieve. The aircraft that they built would only last about 3 weeks. The temperature on the planet is average 800 degrees fahrenheit and the atomic pressure is 90 times greater than is is on earth. The Weather on venus is also very dangerous.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "As the years go by there had seemed to be more and more polution in the world. Most of that polution had been seen to be produced by cars, which some people wouldn't know how to live without. However, studies have shown that some cities around the world have actually decreased the usage of cars. A city that has virtually no cars would be Vauban, Germany, and other cities such as Paris, France, Bogota, Colombia, and even some in the United States have joined in the decreasing of car use wagan. In turn of not using cars as much the polution has gone down in those cities.\n\nTo begin with, Vauban, Germany, in this German city \" Street parking, driveways and home garages are generally forbidden in this experimental new district on the outskirts of Freiburg, near the French and Swiss borders. Vauban's streets are completely 'car-free'-- except the main thoroughfare, where the tram to downtown Freiburg runs, and a few streets on one edge of the community. Car ownership is allowed, but there are only two places to park -- large garages at the edge of the development,where a car-owner buys a space, for $40,000, along with a home.\"( P2, In German Suburn, Life Goes On Without Cars, Elisabeth Rosenthal) And in Paris, \" After days of near-record pollution, Paris enforced a partial driving ban to clear the air of the global city. On Monday motorists with even numbered license plates were ordered to leave their cars at home or suffer a 22-euro fine ($31). The same would apply to odd-numbered plates the following day. Almost 4,000 drivers were fined, according to Reuters ... [Twenty-seven] people had their cars impounded for their reaction to the fine.\"(P10-13, Paris bans driving due to smog, Robert Duffer) That might seem a little bit harsh to some people but in turn \" Congestion was down 60 percent in the capital of France, after five-days of intensifying smog ...(P14, Paris bans driving due to smog, Robert Duffer)\n\nThen there's Bogota, Colombia, where, \" In a program that's set to spread to other countries, millions of Colombians hiked, biked, skated or took buses to work during a car-free day yesterday, leaving the streets of this capital city eerily devoid of traffic jams. It was the third straight year cars have been banned with only buses and taxis permitted for the Day Without Cars in this capital city of 7 million. The goal is to promote alternative transportation and reduce smog. Violaters faced $25 fines. The turnout was large, despite gray clouds that dumped accasional rain showers on Bogota.\" (P20-22, Car-free day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota, Andrew Selsky) This is a pretty good sign from Colombia, showing that it's being consistant with it's program and not stopping despite the rain. Also, now even the United States is using less cars, \" America's love affair with its vehicles seems to be cooling. When adjusted for population growth, the number of miles driven in the United States peaked in 2005 and dropped steadily thereafter, according to an analysis by Doug Short of Advisor Perspectives, an invesment research comany. As of April 2013, the number of miles driven per person was nearly 9 percent below the peak and equal to where the country was in January 1995.\" (P 32, The End of Car Culture, Elisabeth Rosenthal)\n\nTo conclude, it's great that more and more cities are pitching in to reduce polution due to cars. There are great advantages coming from the reduction of car usage, the best being less polution and smog. If more cities join in and the current cities keep doing what they are doing there could possibly be an even more dramatic decrease in the polution produced today. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "This could be very vaulable. It could change the way things are being taught in class, when a student is bored the computer could pick up on it and find a way to make it more fun, also while letting teacher's know how their student's are feeling so they can find ways to make the class more upbeat and fun to learn in.\n\nThis techonlogy could be very useful to teacher's and students alike.\n\nTeacher's could understand how their student's are feeling and find way to help them and figure out what it is they need, and how soon they need it.\n\nSome student's are not very open, with their emotions or even their home life, this could help teacher's help student's that may be in need of social servies and such. With that being said, yes this could be very useful to other's and provide how student's feel in a class room on a daily bases. Even though, some may think that, that is the most stupiest thing ever to be told. Nobody in this day and age is very open with each other, they all feel the need to be one man for himself, nobody cares about how anyone else might feel, not even younger teachers, they think that because they are older they are more vauble and whatever they do is correct, if soemone who truly cared about their job, had techonogly like this. I feel they would be all means use this in the best way possible. Student's would have more fun and interesting school days, they would have more to come home and tell their parent's about all the cool and intresting stuff they learned that week and how their teacher's made them feel very welcomed and at home. Instead in 2018, almost every student is tested and made to feel dumb because all of these test, that are pushed on them, they won't remember tomorrow because it won't be something that's important.\n\nIn conclusion, school doesn't come easy to everyone. Some students really struggle but won't speak up because some teacher's and other student's make them feel stupid and that, they shouldn't be there. I think this techonogly would further help teachers, maybe, just maybe understand their own student's. If they cared enough to pay attetion to them and actually do what they get paid to do, which is help children learn, and love to learn to pass on to the next generation. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "First, readers... in the story \" A Cowboy Who Rode the Waves\" Lukes participation in the seagoing cowboys program allowed him to experience adventures and go to many places across the sea! In this story He will tell you in his point of veiw. How he feels about the program and why he would want to join. Personally I think I would join from the sounds of it. I think he loved it and the opportunity was great because he took it and you might end out just like him.\n\nSecond , I think that you should join the program because you can go on amazing adventures. And you might travel by water day and night. I bet you can even have lots of fun in europe. And by adventures I mean going through the ocean and climbing mountains. When you travel on water you will go on boats and cross oceans.\"Let us say that you can go to europe to florida to england. Yeah thats how fun it is see that's why should join.\n\nThird, another few reasons you should join is because. You might even see whales, dolphins and fish and I know some people love to eat fish with fishing poles. And you should join because you don't know you might even make new friends. I personally love to fish because you discover new fish and if you want you can eat them. So those are the reasons for you to join this program.\n\nIn conclusion, I am trying to persuade you to join. Well I did the best I could do to persuade you. I hope you deeply consider it. It's Lots of fun and you will go places you dreamed of going. See I know some people get sea sick so I am not forcing you to go but I hope you will take the opportunity to get out and have fun everyone!", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars can definitely be a positive invention, but it could also be a very negative thing for many reasons. My position on driverless cars is that I am against it. In the article, it clearly states several times that if the road conditions were complicated, then the driver would have to take over. The article also says that the driver would often get bored because they're waiting for their turn to take over the wheel. Lastly, the article states that if the car were to have a mishap, the crash would be the driver's fault. The driverless car would not be the one at fault in a complicated situation.\n\nFirstly, in the article, it clearly states that if the road conditions were complicated, then the driver would have to take over.\n\nOne of the reasons that I would be against driverless cars is because I would not want to have to take over if the road conditions are odd. The term 'driverless car' is supposed to mean that it would be completely possible for the car to drive without a person in the car. If they are trying to make these cars smart and driverless, then they should make the cars smart enough that there is no need for a driver in the car.\n\nSecondly, the article also says that the driver would often get bored because they're waiting for their turn to take over the wheel. This is just a personal opinion, but I would prefer to be driving myself because of the aspect of boredom. I do not enjoy being bored, so if I'm bored, I might fal asleep. We don't want sleeping drivers on the road, so this would not be a good idea. The car is supposed to notify the driver when the road conditions are complicated, but that feature won't do any good if the driver is not alert. This means that the whole purpose would be defeated, and there would be more collisions in the road.\n\nLastly, the article states that if the car were to have a mishap, the crash would be the driver's fault. The driverless car would not be the one at fault in a complicated situation. This means that even if I wasn't the one at fault, I would still be the one to blame because I was in the driverless car. I am against driverless cars because if the car has a mishap, then it's my fault, and I don't want to take the blame for it. If my car gets into a crash, I want it to actually be my fault and not the driverless car's fault.\n\nThe article says that the driver would be taking most of the blame for most of the situations, so in the end, would it even be a 'driverless' car? I do not believe that the driver should have to take the fall for something that they didn't do. This means that I am against self-driving cars, and I would prefer if they were off of the roads.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "One famous debate is whether or not the Mona Lisa is smiliing or not. Well science and Facial Action System tell us that she is 83% happy, 9% disgusted, 6% fearful, and 2% angry. Using this technology on humans can help benifit humans in so many critial ways, like for instance, school. Using Facial Action Coding Systems in the classroom would be very beificial to the learning enviroment.\n\nNcik D'Alto gave incredible and reliable statements from many experts in this technonlgy field. D'Alto states \"The computer contructs a 3-D computer model of the face; all 44 major muscles in the model must move like human muscles. Movement of one or more muscles is called and 'action unit'\" (3). By looking at this muscle movement, scientists can identify six basic facial emotions- happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness. The tecnolgy doen's stop there. It can read multiple emotions at once and classify mixed emotions. This image is then portrayed next to a \"neutral\" face. This helps determind what emtions poeple are having, for example you see an ad and your face shows you like it, it will produce another ad similar to the one just shown on the screen. If you dislike it, it will try to look for different ads. This helps in the school enviroment when a student is bored, stuggling, confused or content. This way if a student is struggling or needing help then the computer can modify the lesson.\n\nComputer generated Facial Recongnition is benificial and can help teachers and students identify what they need to indetify what needs to change and stay the same for the student. This should also help students reconize when they need help and will help them self-advocate in the future when needing assisstance. Hopefully in the future these will be placed regularly in the school setting. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author supports the idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit is because in the passage, he explains on how log he has been studying it and at the beginning called it an \"Evening Star\" because it one of the brightest points of light, giving more specific examples on why its more worthy and how important it is to study it immediately to know what else that it might do.\n\nAnother valuble reason that it is important for them to study and examine Venus even more is that Venus is the closest planet near Earth. But, also knowing that both Earth and Venus have travelled around the sun at various different speeds. In the passage, it says \" These differences in speed mean that sometimes we are closer to Mars and other times Venus. Because Venus is sometimes right around the corner- in space terms- humans have sent numerous spacecraft to land on this cloud-draped world.\" This is showing on how hard that they have worked on study on venus to know more on its whereabouts and how dangerous it can be sometimes.\n\nIn my conclusion, this is all shows all why people of Earth want to study Venus so badly and knowing on how dangerous it can really be on studying the planet. For example, on the planet, that it has a very, thick atmosphere which is almost 97% carbon dioxide on it, having highly corrosive sulfuric acid in the atmosphere, and the temperature being at 800 degrees fahrenheit. This giving out a reason on why it is dangerous to enter Venus, but still wanting a chance to explore the planet.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "25 years ago something hysterical happen around Mars.\n\nNASA'S spacecraft called Viking 1 was circumnavigating the planet, snapping photos of possible landning sites for the other spacecraft viking 2.\n\nWhen Viking 2 was found, it was a shadow likeness of a human face.\n\nIt was huge, its length was two miles from end to end. The caption noted it was huge rock formation, but it resembles a human head formed by shadows giving the illusion of eyes, nose, and mouth.\n\nThat does not mean it was an alien, it just means that thats the way the natural landform formed.\n\nThe \"Face on Mars\" has been everywhere from Hollywood films to grocery store checkout lines for 25 years.\n\nVery few scienists believe that he Face was an alien artifact, phtographing Cydonial became a priority for NASA and Mars Global Surveyor arrived at the Red Planet in Septemebr and the year of 1997, about eighteen long tirinig years after the Viking mission concluded.\n\nIt says in the story that the team which is called MOC snapped a picture ten times sharper that the original Vikings photograph.\n\nThousands of peoples anxiety were coming out when they searched the web waiting when the image first appeared on a JPL web site revealing the answer.\n\nThe answer is a Natural landform, there was no alien monument after all.\n\nOn April 8, 2001 a war summer day in Cydonia.\n\nMars Global Surveyor drew close enough for a second look.\n\n\"We had to roll the spacecraft 25 degrees to center the Face in the field of view,\"\n\nsaid Garvin.\n\nMalin's crew captured and extraordinary image using the camera's absolute maximum resolution.\n\nEach pixel in he 2001 image spans 1.56 meters, compared to 43 meters per pixel in the best 1976 viking photo.\n\nBut as a rule of thumb, you can discern things in a digital image 3 times better and bigger that pixel size.\n\nSo if there were objects in this picture like airplanes on the ground or Egyptian-style pyramids or even small shacks, you could see what they where.\n\nThe picture actually reveals that there is a martian equivalent of butte or mesa landforms common around the American West.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I see that you believe that the \"Face on Mars\" is created by aliens. Well you're wrong, it's not made by aliens, its just a landform. Yes, some years ago when Viking 1 was taking pictures in Cydonia, looking for a landing site for its sister ship, Viking 2, it found and odd figure in one of the pictures. A figure of a face appeared and the controllers of the Jet Propulsion Lab were surprised. But later on they found that it was just a Martian mesa, and mesas are common in Cydonia.\n\nLater on they released the picture for people to see. And the face became famous, it appeared in fils, books, magazines, etc... People began to think that the \"face was evidence about life on Mars when it wasn't it was just a mesa.\n\nThose working at Nasa kept on trying to change the minds of the people so that they would end all the nonsense about life on Mars. Very few scientists believed that the Face was an alien artifact, and when the Mars Gobal Surveyor arrived in Mars in 1997 taking pictures of Cydonia was crucial. They basically wanted to prove the people worng about this alien stuff! They wanted to take some good pictures to convince the people that it was just a mesa.\n\nSo then on April 5, 1998, when the Mars Global surveyor flew over Cydonia they took some pictures that were way sharper than the original Viking photos. Thousands of excited and impatient internet surfers were waiting on the new image of the Face on the JPL web site and when the image was finally revealed they saw that it was just an ordinary landform.\n\nThis is proof that the conspiracys were wrong and were just a bunch of ideas not true facts. Also that NASA was right all along and that it was just a matter of time until the truth came out. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "BEGINNING: I think its true because some computers now have facial scan recognition but they cost a arm and a leg to buy but i dont think its worth it to buy a computer that cost a arm and a leg because if something goes wrong with the computer their will be no refunds but their should be refunds because they could probably sell u a broken or damaged computer.\n\nNext: do think it would be a good idea to make a computer thats u can only access with your face because now a days people tend to steal stuff that doesnt belong to them like for example i had a friend who tried to steal my headphones one day but i had officer force her to give them back but when she gave them back the were broke.\n\nConclusion: i think that mona lisa probably was a hard picture to face scan because there were so many differnt copys of the original paintning but im pretty sure the real painting is in a museum heavinly gauarded by people with heavy artilllery and grenades and army men with truck but inconclusion if your a great painter do your best because one day u might a famouse painter like Leanardo da Vinci or bettter ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "When comparing the Mona Lisa smile to othersyou can tell the difference between a genuine smile and a forced one, also Dr. Paul say's there's technology telling what a person if feeling by their face, lastly you can tell when a person is feeling some type of way by a video.\n\nThe difference between a genuine smile and a forced smile is that, a genuine smile is when you have to use less bones to smile about e6 bones to smile, and you look like your into the smile for a reason, and forced smile is when there's a smile barley on your face and its easy for you to get it off your face. Because, you were barley smiling, and that means your forcing yourself to smile.\n\nTechnology telling you how a person feel is kind unlikly to happen in this century right now. The only way too know how someone feel is by the way they act toward other people and theirself. they isolate theirself from everyone, and they don't be theirself.\n\nWhen people start looking and things they dont normally look at, or normally watch then you know that something is wrong with them. Because, they not being theirself, and it's not normal for them to do something like that. It would be weird for you, and then your going to want to say something instead of sitting back and watching it happen. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I will be giving you guys an essay of why you should join the program.\n\nyou should join the program because it is fun to ride a cattle boat. And you get good deeds if you help people. It is a big adventure. And you should join it because you do a lot of activities.\n\nFor example the text states that \"The cattle boat trips were an unbielivable oppurtunity for smal-town boy. The text also states that \"The cowboys played baseball and volleyball games in the empty holds where animals had been housed.\n\nSome people think that people shouldn't join it. They think that it is a dumb program. They even think it is not an adventure. I think they are wrong and a lot of people like Luke think that it is not dumb and that it is an adventure.\n\nHopefully you injoyed my essay and want to join the program to.\n\nI gave you guys some details why you should join it. And i showed some examples of people that think you shouldn't join it. Hopefully you guys are on my side. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think that the Electoral College is a bad way of picking a president, because as Americans , we have the freedom of speech and that should include voting as well. the Electoral College system works and for some states it \"fits the shoe,\" for example California, they have 55 representatives .\n\nThe Electoral College allows the electoral votes to be given out by the voters and the population in that state may never actually honestly choose who they want in office . in other cases itthe presidential canidates have more intrest in the bigger states such as Florida. that could boost in the jobs, and advanteges in the bigger states.\n\nIn defense of the Electoral College , it can be a faster way to elect a new president , it also allows people to lose intrest since their votes don't effect much in the long run. the votes of the people should effect who should be in office because with what I know about the Electoral College, it could break a country. It takes away freedom of speech. But helps the canidate(s) from your state , which can possibly help your state in the long run .\n\nThe popular votes allows you to choose who you want to be in office and if the person you voted for lost , at least you had your vote. You can easily have had you vote given to someone and they could have had cheated you out .\n\nIf the Electoral College is kept going then there should be some changes to how it is done. For example , the small states have less say in what happens compaired to the bigger states like California and Florida . It should balance out so that it can be fair but also equaled out. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "About venus challenge\n\nPeople called venusa a \" Every stry\"; because it the brigtest light in the night sky. make it esay tp spot it in sky but the name is misleding it a venus is a planet. Venus is are second planent from the sun. So venus is the second hottes planent of the earth.so peopele really live on it. venus is over 800 degrees and fahrenheuil on the surface of venus. Some people say venus is earth twin beacuse venus is closest and it densith and size. beacuse of venus is closest to the sun it speed is little fast then earth.\n\nsome people wnat to exlporing venus. while venus is simlpe to seen from the distant but safe vantage pount of the eart, it has proved a very challenging place to eamine more closely. so many thing are happand to venus but what know about if can put pepleo on the planet. what are the challenging we can do want venus. people have sent spacecraft to land on this cloud-draped wprld\n\nbeacuse it no spacecraft well survived the landin for more than a few hours. make it hard to get on venus beacuse of the speed and get on time.\n\nvenus have geolog and weather prsent. make erupting volcanoes powerful earthquakes, and frequent lightning strikes; then earth have. venus is anymose like earth it have mountains, craters and valleys like earth have.\n\nwe need to closets to venus to get researchers of venus like rock, gas, and anything. the NASA are try to sending humans to study venus. NASA is try to approaches to studying veuns.now we get better in life will time past. we need more thing to get to venus and do lot of on venus. we need to better the challlenge of venus ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Imagine that the technology will be able to read people's emotional expressions and understand what they actually think about. The technology has been continuing to develop, and it makes more convinience world today. Dr. Huang had enthusiasm to use the new technology, called the Facial Action Code System (FACS), for figuring out how it possible to know that the actual emotion of people. The reason why, people sometimes make fake face for hiding something. Using famous paint \"Mona Lisa\", Dr. Huang look for what the actual emotion of the women for instance.\n\nThe \"Mona Lisa\" is a remarkbly famous paint, also it is known as mysterious painting. Some people can see the paint of the women is smiling, on the one other hand, some people disapprove it. Dr. Huang figured which FACS would calculate what is the exactly emotion the women has; the FACS can figure out the emotion by looking movement of the muscle. Similary, he avocates that people actually can add this system on the computer in the future. By using advantages of this technology, it will give more profit for their work or educational system alot. The only disadvantage is when people work with such as this technology system, they would require to make smile whenever the situation. Meanwhile, it will not be able to help in the normal life such as when talking with family or friends, because sometimes people do not have to know.\n\nPeople could finally understand the actual emotional expressions of the Mona Lisa because the FACS created. The FACS is available for figuring out the actual emotions of people by looking their muscle system. It is incredibly an amazing however, people require to consider the situation of using this technology. Because it possible to occur some problem without propriate thinking. Today, most people have been spending convinience life by using technology, but it is significant to consider what is honestly neccesary for us.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I feel as if you can really tell the emotion expressions on peoples face but I also feel as if you cant with technology because the computer really dont know what that person is feeling or how that person is doing. But for me you can tell if an person is in a good mood or in a bad mood by the look on their face sometimes. But the crazy thing is that some people hide their problems away so you realy dont know what they are going through.\n\nAs a human bean you know when someone isnt feeling so good or they are feeling so good , and the only they you can do is ask them is they are alright or cool. But the big thing of all I dont think technology can read the emotion expression of people because its an computer and sometime computer be have mistakes and even diffuclts. The other crazy thing is to is that the emotinal computer can tell you percents on how happy , sad , angry , or fearful you or that person is. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Should computers read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom? No because, why should a computer know how your feeling? It wouldn't change the emotion the students feeling. It also wouldn't help with the students education. Its over all just a waste of time.\n\nThe process begins when the computer puts together a 3-D digital model. There are 44 major muscles in your face that the computer has to detect. Eckman classified six emotions happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness. He then \" associated each with characteristic movements of facial muscles.\"\n\nFor example the frontalis pars lateralis muscle is above your eye which shows your surpried when it is raised.\n\nUs humans alone can identify facial expressions on peoples faces. If you look at a friend you can tell how they are feeling at that moment. Da Vinci studied human anatomy to help paint the facial muscles percisely on the Mona Lisa painting. Dr. Huangs has new computer software it stores similar info as electronic code. He thinks there could be a different type of code to the painting.\n\nWhen facial facial expressions a made its about muscular action units. The school computer shouldn't have to know how you are feeling. What kind of problem is that supposed to solve? This idea is nothing but just a distraction for school students. It also may detect wrong facial expressions.\n\nTo conclusion computers in school shouldn't detect emotions of the students. I have proved my point on why it shouldn't be in school. I have given you several examples from the passage to prove this point. It shoudn't matter if the computer knows how your feeling. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\" written by Nick D'Alto, talks about a 3-D computer model that can recognize facial movements and emotions. Dr. Paul Eckman created FACS, which stands for Fact Action Coding System. FACS classifys basic emotions such as happiness, surprise, anger, and sadness. This type of technology can be valuable for students in a classroom because it can help read the students emotions.\n\nFACS can be valuable for students because the computer will get to know how you are feeling. In the article, Nick D'Alto talks about how we humans have trouble figuring out facial traits of one another. With the FACS technology, it can detect what the person is feeling. The author Nick D'Alto quotes, \"FACS can figure out whether a person is happy, sad or confused.\"(D'Alto). The author talks about how the FACS technology can determine a person's facial trait by simply looking at the person's face. Nick D'Alto also talks about how the computer software stores similar information on anatomy. Human anatomy is a way to convey specific emotions. With FACS, the computer software contains informaton on human anatomy. The article quotes,\"His new computer software stores similar anatomical information as electronic code.\"(D'Alto). The quotes explains that the technology FACS stores human anatomy as a way to convey specific emotions. FACS not only can detect emotions, but it can also make people happy. The computer can be useful for students because it can make them feel better. FACS talks about how it can bring a smile to someone's face. In the article it states, \"If you smile when a web ad appears on your screen, a similar ad might follow, But if you frown the next ad will be different.\"(D'Alto).The author explains that FACS can bring a smile into a person's face by changing web ads on the screen. The article then goes on to talk about how the computer can help the student if they are sad. D'Alto quotes, \" A classroom computer can help recognize when a student is confused or bored, then it could modify the lession like an effective human instructor.\"(D'Alto). FACS can help students through depression or anger\n\nby being a effective human instructor. FACS can be helpful towards students in classrooms because it can help them be happy. In the article is states explains how the FACS bringing happiness is a benefit for not only for the students but for everybody. In the article, a source by Facial Feedback, talks about how making a happy face is a strength. Facial Feedback quotes, \"Moving facial muscles not only expresses emotions, but also may even help produce them.\"(D'Alto). Facial Feedback states that the FACS can make the students happy and it makes them express their emotions.\n\nThe article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\" written by Nick D'Alto, talks about how the technology named FACS can be valuable for students in a classroom. FACS is a 3-D computer model which stands for Facial Action Coding System. Nick D'Alto talks about how FACS can determine a person's emotions whether it's sad, anger, or confusion. FACS can also make people put a smile on their face by being an effective human instructor and changing web ads that match your facial expression. FACS is a technology that can help students by reading their facial expressions and bringing a smile on their face. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The reason why Luke went to Europe was because his friend Don invited him to go. When Luke graduation he had two part time jobs but when his friend Don invited he to go to Europe on a cattle bout luke was happy to go with his friend Don.\n\nLuke was on the cattle bout from 1945 to 1947 because he had to make nine trips from the Eastern coast of the United States to china that is a mouth away from the United States. When Luke was on the cattle bout he found fun thing to do like play baseball,vollyball in the empty holds where animals been housed they even played table -tennis, fencing, boxing and reading whittling.\n\nIn Luke point of view he was happy that he got to go on the cattle bout and help people get the animals to Europe and chine but it took two year to get all the animals to Europe and chine. Luke was a seagoing cowboy when he was on th cattle bout. It was more then an adventure to Luke it opened up the world to Luke. Luk was greatful for the opportunity to go on a cattle bout.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Face, an interesting topic to many people. Although some people question its formity. Is it a natural landform? Or was it created by Aliens? People have their opinions on what it is but after doing more research from NASA, this article explains what the Face really is. It gives you background information to help understand what the Face is, a natural landform.\n\n\"The Face has been seen by multiple NASA scientists. Many argue that it was created by Aliens while others argue the Face is just a natural landform. In paragraph three of the article it states \"The caption noted a 'huge rock formation... which resembles as a human head... formed by shadows giving the illusion of eyes, nose, and mouth.\" The paragraph said it was a rock formation, which is part of natural landform. The Face was just a rock forned like a human head and that only the shadows are giving out an illusion of a human face. After a few years scientists went back to Cydonia to explore more about this odd structure. On April 5, 1998, Mars Global Surveyor flew over Cydonia for the first time. Michael Malin and his Mars Orbiters camera team snapped a picture ten times sharper than the orginial Viking's photos. On a JPL web site it was revealed that there was no alien momentum after all, it was just a natural landform. People were still not satisfied with this research. So on April 8, 2001, Mars Global Surveyor went back to Cydonia to snap more pictures of the Face. Once he got the picture, the text states in paragraph twelve \"What the picture actually shows is the Martian equivalent of a Butee or messa-landforms common in the American west.\"\n\nThis article gives more research and information about the Face being a natural landform then it does about it being created by Aliens. In some paragraphs the text gives you background information to understand that the Face is a natural landform. People may still have their thoughts about it being created by Aliens but as NASA explores more about this structure they have all the proof they need to prove that the Face is yet another natural landform.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The challenge of exploring venus more of study the earth different kinds names. The man work of earth or different reseach what years and what date more history. Sometimes earth is meduim or big different shapes some same. Solar systern arounds a 8 the sun being to earth unitl last. Never stop to reseach keep up more deep and lots to inforntion.\n\nVenus sometimes called a ''Evening Star'' like of bright of lights in the night sky. Venus is the second planet from ours sun. That very a challenge of venus. And that name is nickname just a simlpe. Venus challenging planet for human to study to show the us. Have a good resson to veuns of those.\n\nThe national aeronautics and space have a human to stduy\n\nthe veuns. NASA is working on the orther to study veuns reseach and test see if the pass or good or bad. Have a different to technology and check how was going on. And no rocks in solar systern sometimes have it. Solar systern have a different to names their and colors too.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Growing up in the more modern times I see many things that would seem almost impossible to someone not born in this time. Cars are becoming more advanced than ever. Although they have their advantages, the use of cars also has many disadvantages. They polute the air and they can be very dangerous. The pros of cars are by far outweighed by the cons, if you look at them in the long run. Limiting car use could preserve the earth, relieve stress, and reduce the amount of overweight people in America .\n\nAlthough cars make everyday life easier, lessening the use of them could potentially \"save the world.\" Polution is at an all time high and car emissions are largely to blame. In paragraph five it states that, \"Passenger cars are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in Euope... and up to 50 percent in some car-intensive areas in the United States.\" This is saying that the emissions from cars are destroying the earth. Though going to the grocery store that is two miles away may seem easier by just hoping in the car and arriving in less than five minutes, walking or biking would be better for you and the environment. Many cities are even focusing on becoming more \"pedestrian friendly\" to help boost the enthusiasm of cutting the use of cars. Walking is not the only option either, using hybrid cars, carpooling, or public transportation is also an option. Though still involving the use of cars, emissions would be reduced greatly. Also, emissions can cause sickness. In large cities where cars are depended on there is Smog. Smog is a thick black cloud of pollution that hangs in the air over large ciies. Smog can make you very sick if you injest it. Many people in cities that do have smog have to wear face masks when walking outside. I do not think that face masks are a new trend that everyone would like to start wearing. Lessening the use of cars around us would be a healthy step towards restoring our environment and could start a trend for others to do so aswell.\n\nAnother advantage of cutting the use of cars would be less accidents. Thousands of car related accidents happen every minute around the world in automobiles. If everyone started walking, biking, or using pubilc transportation less cars would be on the road leading to less accidents. Families lose loved ones everyday just because the driver of the car isnt paying attention. Drivers have many extra responisbilities when opperating the vehicle. They have to watch everything around them, including being responsible for everyone else in the car. Many people have reported being \"less stressed\" after they lowered the use of cars. Heidrun Walter said \"When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way,\" when talking about moving to a car free community. Thousands are converting to the trend of using the car less and others are cutting the use completely! Following this trend would be a large benefit to yourself and the enviornment around you.\n\nLastly, America is known for being obese and cars support this idea. Cars make it easy for someone to get places without putting any physical work into it. Cars encourage people to be lazy. Lowering the use of cars and walking more would help reduce the percent of people that are overweight in our country. Instead of wanting to get in the car and drive to do something they could walk and get some excercise or even take a bike if they wanted to get there faster. Walking and biking are low intensity excercises making it easy for everyone to participate. Many overweight people always feel lathargic, getting out and walking or biking would also help them to feel better. Doing this would help our people and environtment become more heatlhy.\n\nCars are a great invention but it is not necessary for every individual to have one. Walking and biking are better alternatives. The use of cars has gone through the roof creating problems around the world. A healthy environment for our children and grandchildren is what we imagine. One does not think of using a car as damaging to the enviornment until after they have done it. Limiting car usage would turn the world into a healthier, stress reduced place. For these reasons I think it would be of best interest to try and find other alternatives to driving as much. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Venus, otherwise known as the \"Evening Star,\" is one of the more challenging planets to examine closely in our solar system. While this plant is often called Earth's twin, it is vastly different in terms of environment and hospitability. Despite being the closest planet to Earth at times, no spaceship has touched down on Venus in over thirty years. The dangers presented by Venus are many, but the author greatly supports the idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite these dangers. The author supports this claim by stating that the insight to be gained is significant and by offering methods for obtaining these insights despite the danger that is readily appearant.\n\nVenus is one of the most challenging planets to examine due to its very extreme environment. Paragraph 3 of the article is all about the extreme environment that Venus presents. Venus has temperatures over 800 degress Fahrenheit, an atmospheric pressure 90 times greater than that on Earth, erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and other obstacles that prove challenging for scientists to overcome. Additionally, Venus has clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in the atmosphere which prove to be challenging to scientists. These dangers may seem impossible to overcome, but scientists have been developing new methods to further their knowledge of Venus.\n\nNASA is one organization that has been developing particularly interesting ideas about how to further study Venus. They are considering a blimp-like vehicle that would float above the suface of Venus to meet the challenges presented. This blimp would avoid the poor conditions of the Venusian landscape by floating some thirty miles above the surface. Conditions around the blimp would still be slightly hot, but the pressure and toxicity would be similar to that on Earth. These conditions are not ideal, but they would be sufficient enough to study Venus further. Another one of NASA's ideas is to use mechanical computers to study Venus. These mechanical computers do not require electronics, and they would be more resistant to the poor conditions of the surface. These new innovations in the study of Venus is what makes the dangers tolerable and the study worthy.\n\nAccording to the article, astronomers are interested in Venus because it was likely the most Earth-like planet in the solar system at one point. Venus used to be covered in oceans and supported life. Additionally, Venus still has features that are similar to Earth's such as a rocky sediment with valleys, mountains, and craters. Insight into the Venusian landscape would further allow astronomers to determine how closely related Earth and Venus were. The author also states that humans should not be limited by their fear to go out and explore. In the final paragraph of the article, the author describes how human curiosity will lead humans into many intimidating expidentures. However, the author believes that travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited simply due to danger, and humans should travel as far as their innovation will take them.\n\nThe author of this article supports the idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers by stating the insight to be gained from further exploring Venus and by presenting new methods that are making new insights possible. The danger of Venus is extensive due to the high temperatures, extreme atmospheric pressure, and wild weather patterns. These obstacles are being dealt with though by new ideas from scientists at NASA. One big idea from NASA is the idea to use a blimp to observe Venus from above the surface. Another idea of theirs is to use materials that would be able to withstand the extreme conditions of the Venusian environment. All this is in the hopes that futher insight will be made on the planet that once was the most Earth-like planet in the solar system.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "This articel is about driverless cars. I am so against these cars and im going to give u reasons why. For now i am just going to tell you what the car is.driveless cars are an idea they made up where its like a public taxi. He thinks these cars would chage the world I think other wise.\n\nIn order to have these cars alot of money would have to be put into this. You would have to make so much money in order to make every car. Im going to tell u the pros and the cons of them making these cars. For one it says the car would need a lot of sensors in order to just work the car. They need GPS four automotive sensors. Its just so much detail that goes into making cars like this. They would make so much more money if they countine to sell cars like they have been doing for so long.\n\nThere also brake sensors. Every car is man made. At anytime these car can decide they want to stop working and they could crash. There so many areas where this could go wrong. You have to think if u want to out yourself in danger,or even your family.This also gives people the chabge to text and drive. That has always been a big thing. It says in the artice \"The driverless car is made to where it can streer itself and brake but designed to notife the driver when the road ahead requires. So this gives people\n\nthe time to eat,drink,sleep,text all in one. So what happen if the driver is texting and driving the car does not alert them and a crash happens.Or the driver head is down and the car sensor all of a sudden stops and does not alert the driver thers a crash there.\n\nIn most sates this illegal to test computer driven cars. So there u think they go out and out these cars on the road when not even been yet tested. What do u think is going to happen. All it takes is one milfunction and there going to have crashes all over the place. Instead of making these kind of cars the cars we have now our just find with the person behind the wheel doing all the work. There wasting money one these cars and in some staes there not even going to be abel to test so its going to be a waste of time. You also have to put in mind teenagers are going to be driving to. There also going to think its ok for them to do anything while the car is doing all the work. people are starting to get so lazy with all this new computer systems.\n\nSo let me sum up what i was trying to say. these driverless cars is a bad idea to buy or even make. As much money there spending on these cars they could put in buliding new buildings or fixing the roads. So much new things can be put in the car that we are driving today instead of risking lives. So lady and men think beofore u buy a driverless car or think beofre they decide to male a driverless car. Anything can go wrong. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In this article I will be explaining why I think aliens did not create this Face. I will give reasons why I think it could be aliens. I also will be giving reasons why it I believe it is not aliens. There are a lot of theories out that that say there are aliens but those theories don't have very good evidence.\n\nDo you believe in aliens? Many people do belive in aliens. I don't believe that this face was created by aliens. I believe that this was is a natural landform. Erosion could of token place to create this random looking thing. There could've been many things that could create this but one of those is not aliens. Aliens are not real. Another thing that could've token place was someone could've carved it out to get attention. I don't think this would happen but you know how people are these days. This also could be caused by tectonic plates moving around this all of a sudden two or more parts collided and created this. They have proven that aliens aren't real.\n\nDid comprehend was I just said? Well if not read this! As some people believe that aliens did this others believe that it's just a natural landform. Although it is kind of weird how there is just a random face on the planet, I strongly disagree that this was caused by aliens. It couldv'e been caused by tectonic plates, maybe someone carved it, or it just could've been there on it's own. I hope these reason will help you understand why it was a natural landform. You can make your own decision on what you believe but those are just a few disagreements. Hope you enjoyed! ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Venus is not just a non-living planet, but a new world to discover. NASA is a resource we can use to discover new things about our universe that we can't see. Other plantes, such as Venus, can be a way to challenge our discoveries deeper with answers and improvement. Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers that can expand our imaginations and innovation.\n\nIn addition, Venus can be a discovering postion to expanding new things in our universe and learning what's out there, than just Earth. In pragragh 8, the author states that, \"Striving to meet the challenge presentes by Venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors\". This explains that Venus can not only be a new planet we discover as a whole different world, but a planet we can discover and understand the concepts of the universe as human beings. Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers that can expand our imaginations and innovation.\n\nIn conclusion, the challenge of exploring Venus can be a risk of dangerous it presents. As human beings, we can become curious of what's out there, and ask questions about our universe. A challenge can be a risk, but a value we can use to answer our questions to our new discovers we wondered about. It can improve our unsolved discoveries to new discovers we had qestions about before. The risk of exploring Venus is a worthy pursuit, despite the dangers, that can expand our imaginations and innovation. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Could computers really help with learing and making school assignments or lessons easier? In my opinion they can! Many kids in school don't always understand the teaching ways teachers have, making it harder for them to work on assignments and even past tests. A computer that could read your expressions would help significantly. It would help you by reading your facial expressions while reading, learning, or taking a test even. By doing this it can make things easier to read of even modify the lesson in a new way, one that you can undestand. By reading your emotions and changing the learning way, kids will succeed in school more and understand more.\n\nOne way I think it will help is that it can see when you're confused or if you understand completly, to know if it should change the wording or the teaching way. For example in paragraph 6 it talks about a classroom computer recognizing when a student is bored or even confused. \"It could modify the lesson, like and effective human instructor.\" This would make it so a student was never bored enough to fall alseep or confused to the point they give up.\n\nAnother reason it would be helpful is because it wouldn't just be limited to the classroom or someones own time. Since it's on a computer you could use it almost anywhere, or whenever you feel like you need extra time learning. Also teachers can not keep track of every students emotion, only a few if that. A computer would work individually and could detect each emotion of the students that used the computer.\n\nMy last reason I agree with computers that can read our emotions is that even though humans can read or sense our feelings they can not actually describe each facial trait that conveys the emotions you are feeling. The teachers dont always notice when a student is confused but a computer will.Teachers can only watch a few students at a time if that, making it hard for them to help every student. If each student had their own computer, the student woudldnt have to worry about the teaching noticing them.\n\nComputers have come a long way from when they first were invented. Technology is increasing and helping people out in their everyday lives. Now that we have found a way to help students in their everyday lives with school and work why should we not take a chance. This could help the future and even more with the learning and developing new things. Students could always use a fresh new learning way. The generation is changing and our technology should change with it. This is why I agree with Facial Action Coding. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "We all know there are 7 wonders of the world, but could this be the first wonder of the universe. Nature can make some astonishing things. Many things in the world, or even the universe, are nature-made. They have been here since the beginning of time even though they seem to be man-made. The \"Face\" should be included in this category. This \"Face\" was created by natural processes.\n\nSimilar to the \"Face\", places on Earth are nature-made. Even though sand dunes on beaches are kept by humans, they were first nature-made. Sand storms on Earth create higher dunes in deserts because the starting dune blocks the sand from getting across it. This may be what caused the \"Face\" to be created. There may have been an oval shaped dune at that spot, and, then, a \"storm\" passed by. The beginning dune blocked the Mars sand from exceeding that barrier, and the \"Face\" we see now was created. The shadows forming the eyes, nose and mouth were created on accident.\n\nSometimes landforms are created when objects collide with planets. The \"Face\" could have been formed when a meteor crashed into Mars. Only this time the crash did not create a crater, but instead a protruding object that over the years got rounded out by storms. Evidence does not suggest that every single meteor strike causes a crater. The reason that craters are an effect on Earth may be due to Earth's atmosphere or it's magnetic field. This may just be the first time NASA has ever seen a mound created by a meteor strike. There could be more out in the universe that NASA hasn't observed yet.\n\nIn April of 1998, a photo was taken that was blury due to Martian clouds. Many people exclaimed that the clouds may have blocked some alien markings. When NASA took another photo in April of 2001, the photo does not seem to portray any alien markings. Furthermore, the \"Face\" looked as though it has cracked on the side. Suggesting that there are Martians on Mars and, along with that, there were Martians that made this \"Face\", why wouldn't the Martians fix their monument when it cracks. This led me to believe that not only did the \"Martians\" on Mars not build this, but, additionally, there are no Martians on Mars.\n\nOthers may say that, comparative to the Mound Builder Indians on Earth, the \"Face\" was created by Martians bringing dirt to one spot and creating that \"mound\". If that was the case, then how come, in all of the photos and evidence we have from Mars, NASA has never once seen a Martian. They might be hiding from us, but, like Humans, couldn't Martians have messed up, and they forgot to hide one time.\n\nThis \"Face\" is created by natural processes. Even though it has been extremely controversial over whether it is alien-made or nature-made, more evidence suggests that the \"Face\" is nature-made. Many things in the universe can cause a mound on a planet, but finding out which one is the cause of the \"Face\" may never be known.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Being in a classroom with a large amount of students can be intimidating. This makes it easier for a student to fall behind in a classroom setting, since they may be too scared to ask a question. One may be thinking, ¨what if they laugh at me if I raise my hand?¨ Or maybe that student may need a different teaching approach, but they do not know how to convey this to them. There could be a solution to this problem. New technology uses a computer that ¨constructs a 3-D computer model of the face¨ (¨Making Mona Lisa Smile) it can be used to process the emotions that a student may be feeling. Meaning that technology reading emotional expressions of students in a classroom is valuable and beneficial.\n\nReading the emotions of students can help the teachers gather more beneficial data on them. As they constantly say that ¨they are not mind readers.¨ However many students may be embarrased that they are not quite understanding the content. To which this technology could provide some assistance. The computer could simply read and see what percentage of the class is confused. If it is a large percentage then that means the teacher can go over it as a whole class. Also working vise versa meaning that if it is a smaller percentage then the teacher can make smaller groups and provide the needed attention to them. This theory was stated by Dr. Huang, ¨´A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored,´ Dr. Huang predicts. ´Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor´¨ (¨Making Mona Lisa Smile¨). Although the article refers to online classes the same can be applied to the human interative classroom. The teacher can look at the data during the lesson to check understanding along the way and then provide the extra needed support to those that need it. Then let those that understand it move forward. That way the children don´t fall behind, and the children that understand the content can be further challenged. Providing a more effective and rigourous courseload.\n\nAnother benefit that this technology presents is that it can read the distressing emotions of a student. Especially during the high school years which are very stressful in both the workload and character development. A teacher is able to see if that student is upset, angry, or stressed. Or even a combination of these emotions because ¨By weighting the different units, the software can even identify mixed emotions (as in da Vinci´s masterpiece)¨ (¨Making Mona Lisa Smile¨). If a student had a particularly stressful event go on in their household they may feel angry, frustrated, and sad. The teacher can then understand that they are going through a moment and be sure to provide some support. Also if the students are feeling especially stressed the teachers may even provide some kind of stress relief day, since prolonged stress can have some serious effects on the human body. This technology may even be able to detect mental illnesses such as depression or anxiety. To which the student can be provided with the support that they need. Possibly leading to the prevention of suicide attempts and anxiety attacks.\n\nIn conclusion, having technology in the classroom can be extremely beneficial to both the students and the teachers. It can provide useful data to the teachers. To which they can adjust their teaching plan accordingly, and effectively educate all the students. Futhermore it can help students dealing with mental health issues. Making sure that they get the help and support that they need in order to be the most attentive in the classroom as they can be. As technology continues to be implemented into the teaching program this computer software should be considered as well. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The limiting on car usage would be a huge positive on the world and the people. As everyone knows, cars now adays are the key to \"Making it around the world\". They say cars make your life easier and its good for the economy. Some of those facts are true but at the same time not exaclty.\n\nAutomobiles are the \"linchpin of suburbs\". People can not live without their cars and need them for where ever they need to go ; work,the park,the store. Sooner or later in the future humans might not live at all with the usage of cars. In the article In German Suburbs,Life Goes On Without Cars, it says \"Passenger cars are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emmisions in Europe\". All these fums and such are beimg spread in the air. And in Paris, pollution was a big effect on the peopel. Filing the air with smokes and harmful gases that affect a persons health. Do you want to go outside and have a hard time breathing?- Nope i didnt think so. Congestion was down 60 percent in the capital of France after intensifying smog. Diesel fuel was the cause of that only because France favors diesel over gasoline. This decrease in cars will be better for implications for carbon emissions and the environment.\n\nWhen you buy a car, you need space for it to stay in. A space can cost up to $40,000 max. That is alot of money you could save for other appliances and daily life products. Also with a car you may get fines for speeding or anything in that state. In the article Paris bans driving due to smog Robert Duffer said motorists with even-numbered license plates were ordered to leave their cars at home or suffer a 22-euro fine. Almost 4,000 drivers were fined. The less cars the better! why go through all that trouble. As well as less cars means no highway usage meaning more construction for buildings and stores. And think about it! More stores you can shop at and save more money to shop at those stores because you arent buying gas everywhere you go and paying for car innsurance.\n\nCars are benefitial for alot of things. But for the people and our future,it would be best to cut out cars and make our lives healthier and better. It will become a huge positive on the world. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "So when you think of going somewhere mysterious, dangerous, or exiciting, you may think for Oceans. Probably not. Space. Maybe. The Planet Venus. Defintinly. Many people can say they know that Venus is a planet, but not really anything else because we just don't know a lot about it. So Venus is a planet worth discovering because we can learn if the planet use to be Earth a long time ago, find more about it and help us understand the planet more, and despite the dangers how it can benefit us by knowing more about it.\n\nTo start off, understanding a planet is the most benefical way we can do because if we understand it, then we will learn more about it. In the arctilce it says. \" More importanly, reachers cannot take samples of rock, gas, or anything else, from a distance. Therefore, scientists seeking to conduct a through mission to understand Venus would need to get up close and persconal despite the risks. Or maybe we should think of them as challanges. Many reseachers are working are working on innovations that world allow our machines to last long enough to contribute meaningfully to our knowedge of Venus\". This quote from the article supports that even through we don't know much about it, we can still do it if we can get closer to Venus surface to study more and understand why is it the way it is. Also, by knowing more about will help us understand why it the way it is because we will have more information and facts behind understanding it.\n\nNext thing I am going to talk about the the dangers behind Venus and and benefit why knowing about it will make that more easier becasue by doing this we came make it safer for humans and machines to be able to stay there for longer periods of time. In the articleis says \" A thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent crbon dioxide blankets Venus. Even more challenging are the clouds of highly corrosive sufuric acid in Venus's atmosphere. On the planet's surface, temperatures avergaes over 880 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on own planet\". This is showing that the Venus atmosphere is dangerous, but we would not known that if we didn't take a chance to learn more about the planet. Futhermore, if we did not know about this we could gone to Venus and could have died because we did not know what the atmosphere was like.\n\nFuthermore, on the topic of Venus at it the closest related planet to Earth because to has similar geography of Earth. I the article is says \" Astronmers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system. Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth. Today, Venus still has some features that are analogous to thise of Earth. The planet has a surface of rocky sediment and inculdes familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and craters\". This quote is saying that Venus is almost identical to Earth in some many ways like the geography structure to animal life on Earth. This is earthskaing because if Venus is almost indentical to Earth, then maybe millions of years ago that could been what happen to the Earth before ours and could be what this earth could look like millions of years from know.\n\nOn the otherhand they say Venus can be to dangerous because of how bad the atmosphere is for humans and machines. In the article is says \" These conditions are far more extreme than anything humans encounter on Earth; such an environment would crush even a submarine accomtomed to diving to the deepest parts of our oceans and would liquely many metals\". They say this in the article but this is a little false because in the article it says \" Not easy conditions, but survivable for humans\". By saying this in the article this could meaning the quoute could be truth because id the atmosphere is so dangerous when why say its survivable for humans.\n\nAll and all, Venus is a planet worth discovering because we can learn if the planet use to be Earth a long time ago, find more about it and help us understand the planet more, and despite the dangers how it can benefit us by knowing more about it. Find more information about can help for farer investigattion on ethe planet and understanding a planet is the most benefical way we can do because if we understand it, then we will learn more about it. Despite the dangers to behind Venus and and benefit why knowing about it will make that more easier because by doing this we came make it safer for humans and machines so it can be able to stay there for longer periods of time. Aslo, learning about that Venus is the closest related planet to Earth because to has similar geography of Earth can help in faer discovers. Even though they say Venus can be to dangerous because of how bad the atmosphere is for humans and machines, then they say that humans can survived on Venus. So in the end Venus a dangerous planet to be discover, but if we do not, then who will? ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "This will be an argument from Luke's point of view convincing others to participate in the Seagoing Cowboys program. This will include reasons to join the program. It will also include some of the benefits of joining this program.\n\nThese are some reasons why you should join the program. The reason you should\n\nis because we get to go on adventures and to many unique places. One of the places we have been is New Orleans. The reason we were in New Orleans is beacuse we stopped there on our way to Greece. I also got to on a tour to an excavated castle in Crete on my way to China.\n\nIn conclusion these are the reasons why you should join the program. You should also join because it could be a great opportunity for you, like it was for me. Also it could help you better understand people's needs. It could also help you understand countries' needs. If you join this program and enjoy it, you could also help your family have a great opportunity. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Venus is worth studying, you never no when we would poosibly need a new planet.\n\nThe author is trying to explain what it is like on venus how hot it is and how much it is different from earth but also have a few things they have in common like they are really close in size. Only a few aircrafts landed on Venus but were destroyed in the matter of a few hours. Venus has a surface temperature of over 800 f .Venus has an thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets. To top it off are clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus atmosphere. NASA is working on approaches to study venus safely, NASA is using the weather that Venus would have agains a silicon carbide container and lasted for 3 weeks in the chamber.\n\nSo that is why it would be a great idea to learn more about our galaxy.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I am for the development of these cars. The development of these cars would save our ecosystem drastically. It would be a great way to travel or get transportations. There would also be a decrease in crashes and mistakes drivers make in their daily lifes.\n\nThe devolopment of these cars would be great for the future. It would decrease air pollution and use half the gas we already use tody. This invention would save our enviroment. Crashes and traffic law violations would also decrease. The driverless car would have sensors that build a 3-D model of its surroundings to be aware if there is an oncoming vehicle. It would also know the road system and will follow the traffic laws that are inplaces. Its also a great way to travel, traffic will go much quicker because of the decrease in crashes and other mistakes.\n\nTo conclude, this is great invention to continue to develop. The benefits of faster transportation, less chrashes and trafic violations, and its eco friendly. These reasons giive me good belief this is a great advancement of technology for the better.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Over the past years technology has had many different purposes in the world, and now with the help of the softtware \"Facial Action Coding System\" teachers in classrooms will now be able to adress their student's emotions when they act out of the normal. In the article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\" by Nick D'Alto it shows many examples regarding this topic. Because of the student's lack of expressing their emotions verbally, this computer software must be used to reveal what is happening within their heads.\n\nIn order to know what a student's mind wants to be happy and not bored, the teachers must use this software because a person cannot always comprehend facial features. In the aricle it talks about how many emotions showed by making facial expressions are not always comprehendable. According to the author, in paragraph 4 it states \"'The facial expressions for each emotion are universal'\" (D'Alto 4). The term \"universal\" as it is being used in the sentence shows just the magnitude of how much a face can express. If teachers don't use this software, school might just remain boring to students without the teachers knowing.\n\nEven though some people would agree that it is an invasion to privacy to use this in classrooms, the software would be for the good of the lack of communication between the teacher and students. The software would also improve the overall performance of the students during class, since now the teacher would know what to do when the class is bored or happy. In the article it also enhances the facts of nonverbal communication by stating \"'Most human communiction is nonverbal, including emotional communication,' notes Dr. Huang\" (D'Alto 6). If emotions and communications are nonverbal, why not use technology to unravel the thoughts of a student. No teacher would want their students to feel negative feelings towards their classes, so here is an opportunity to make school better for both students and teachers.\n\nStudents may have to be provoked so they can show what they are feeling, however; the teachers making their students show emotion will help them be happier while being in the classroom. Students who do not want to be in school must be adressed first so they are better of in the future. This statement is supported by looking in the article where the author states \"According to the Facial Feedback Theory of Emotion, moving your facial muscles not only expresses emotions, butr also may even help produce them\" (D'Alto 9). Teacher making their students \"break a smile\" would aid their bordem into becoming a happier and more positive emotion.\n\nThus, the use of technology to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is positive, because of the help it would provide on the student's perspective of school. Less students would drop out and more students would go to school and learn just because of the enviroment that the computer software helps evoke. This valuable software must not be ignored! ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author suggests that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents. The author suppports this idea by telling the audience how dangerous the planet is, but then gives us interesting and bizarre background infromation on the planet Venus.\n\nThe author explains how Venus and Earth are \"twin\" planets because the density and size are very similar. The author also talks about how Venus is the second planet away from the sun. Then the author talks about how the planet has a thick atmosphere and how the clouds are highly corrosive. The temperatures get on average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit. The author also tells us that there are erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequeny lightning strikes on the planet. The author talks about even though the planet Venus is dangerous its still interesting to study.\n\nThe author explains how fascinated astronomers are by Venus because it may have once been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system. The author talks about how Venus was probably covered in oceans and could have supported many forms of life. Venus has a surface of rocky sediment an dincludes familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and craters.\n\nThe author gives us information on ho NASA has a plan, or idea, of sending humans to study Venus. The author adds this infromation in to give his article a little more solid facts about Venus. According to NASA, the air pressure would be close to one of a sea level on Earth which makes it even more difficult for humans to survive on the planet.\n\nAs you can see, the author has many ideas that are worthy to pursuit the planet Venus. From the atmoshpere to the temperature, from the geography to the similarites of Venus and Earth, even though highly dangerous to humans, Venus is worth studying.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Venus 97 percent carbon dioxide blanket and a thick atmosphere almost the same as venus percent. The planet surface temperatures average over 800 degrees. The sun is closer to our Mercury even though venus has the hottest surface temperature of planet in our solar system. Surface is the frequent lightning strikes to probes seeking to land.\n\nsystem solar our in planet like earth most the been have once well may it because venus astronomers are fascinated by venus. Study venus the nATIONAL AERONAUTIC AND SPACE Administration (NASA) has one particularly compelling. Imagine a blimp like vehicle hovering 30 or so miles above the roiling venusian landscape.\n\nEarth level sea the air pressure would be close. Solar power would be plentiful radiation would not exceed Earth level. Not easy conditions. Or maybe we sould think of them as challenges.\n\nour travels on earth and beyond should be expanded to meet the vary edges of imagination and innovation. But also because of the insight to be gained on the planet it self. Force other more resistant to pressure and heat. Iportaant role in the 1940 during world war ll.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "My position on the driverless cars are a no go. I kinda understand why you would want one like yeah thats pretty cool a care that can drive its self. I personally i would not spend a dime on a car that i might not be able to controll it. Also whos falut is it if I get hurt or someone else is it my falut or the manufactuer?\n\nLet me say this then four states have made it illegal California, Nevada, Floirda, and District of Columbia. So now here is another reason why you might want to drive or own one of the driverless cars. Texting you guys just want to be able to have that little text time in your daily life every second of the day. So as you are driving and you get a text you can just throw it on auto piot and do want you need to.\n\nBut you also have to think about this you know when they say if you take you eyes off the road for so many sec you can go 100 yards, well thing about it like this you will not be looking back anf forth on the road you will just be looking on your phone less say there is road work and your not looking then Boom!!!! Your done for and to what cost texting and driving? Not wanting to drive? Come on now your better then that.\n\nBut after saying all of that now do you see why I would not pay a dime for it do you see why four states wont even let then built one? just know you are takeing a huge rise everytime you step in that car. Will you come back alive? ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I believe that we should get rid of Electoral College because it seems like that it causes more problems then it does with popular vote. So i think that we should use elections to popular vote over electoral voting. For example, the disaster affect which the state legislatures took responsibilty for picking electors, and those electors could always defy the will of the people. Even though that the electoral college has some pros it has more cons.\n\nThere are a couple things wrong with the Electoral college. In the electoral college system you dont vote for your president you vote a state of electors who in turn elect the president. If your vote won then the state that you live in would get that amount of electoral votes. For example, if you live in florida and your slate of electors won then your president would get 29 electoral votes. But in there has been a few instances where this system has not worked becasue of how close the votes were to each other. If there was a tie then it would be sent to the house of representatives where the state delegations vote on the president. This is one of the reasons why I dont like the electoral college because its one big long process when actually it could only take a couple days if we used popular vote instead of electoral college.\n\nAt the most basic level, the electoral college is unfair to voters. Because of the winner take all system in each state canidates dont spend time in states they know they have no chance of winning focusing only on the tight races in the \"swing\" states. It is not fair to alot of people in our country that they have to be put into this long process of determining who our president is going to be when they could just vote and then they'll be done if they use the popular vote system. If we get rid of the electoral college then the popular vote system will be a more quick and efficent way of voting for our president. Also, there will be less tension in our country and less aruguments going on.\n\nIt's official: The electoral college is unfair, outdated, and irrational. The best arguments in favor of it are mostly assertions without much basis in reality. And the arguments aganist direct elections are spurious at best. Even though there might some reasons why you believe that we should still have the electoral college there are more dangers and risks if we keep the electoral collge. But if we get rid of the electoral college and put in our popular vote system then choosing our president will a lot easier and it will take away controversy in our counrty. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Do you believe in aliens? If so do you believe they left acients remains behind? If you do you're not the only one . About 25 years ago NASA's Viking 1 space craft was circling the planet of Mars , snapping pictures of possible landing zones for it's sister ship viking 2, when it spotted the likeness of a human face . The head was aproximatly two miles long and was staring back at the cameres from a region from Mars called Cydonia .\n\nMission control were suprised at first until they realised it was just another \"Martian mesa\". A few days later NASA unveiled the image to the public and the caption noted huge rock formation . . . which resembles a human head . . . formed by shadows giving the illusion of eyes, nose, and mouth. The authors reasoned it was a great way to attract attention to Mars . The \"Face on Mars \" has became a pop icon it has starred in many magazines and books.\n\nAll the fame that came from the marking soon died out this was all just a natural land formation , it had nothing to do with aliens . Have you ever heard of the\n\nSnake River Plain of Idaho , well it has the same natural formations such as Mars. Many people including you believe that aliens created it ,but there is no proof , in contrast aliens have never even been discovered so why conclude they made this natural formation.\n\nHowever there is a reason why some people may believ that this is an alien making. The cameras that were used that day had trouble getting a clear image because of the cloudy weather that day. So the image is very blurred which may lead to some differnt reasoning on the \"Face on Mars\". NASA try their best to get better shots to prove if it was an alien artifact or not , We felt this was important to taxpayers, said Jim Garvin .\n\nAlthough , this image would bring NASA biliions of dollars if it had been discovered near an ancient civilization .It was only a natural earth formation caused by natural causes , if there was an earthquake would you think aliens made that to . No , exactly because aliens do not exist as we know it. We have no proof that they exist to why conclude that they had made markings on Mars . Just to prove to conspirists like you that aliens didn't leave a marking NASA went to the same spot they took the first images and and retook them again in better weather conditions. They once again found nothing that would relate to a \"martain marking\".\n\nIn conclusion , the \"Face On Mars\" was just a natural formation. This happens in many places on earth too . Which is why you should believe that aliens didnt leave a mark on mars . What the picture actually shows is the Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The time of the founding fathers is long gone. Times have changed which means we have to change our way of thinking. Our way of voting. The Electoral Colege needs to be replaced by popular vote elections because the Electoral College discourages people from voting for their prefered president, influences future presidents to ignore some states, and does not clearly reflect the views of the American people.\n\nInitially, by keeping the Electoral College individuals are less incentivised to vote if they know there is little chance it will do anything. \"Voters in presidential elections are people who want to express a political preference rather than people who think that a single vote may decide an election\" (Source 3, 23). However, by implimenting popular vote, many more people will want to vote knowing that even if their side does not get the majority vote in the state, it still counts for something. Also, from that same source it says \"The advocates of this position are correct in arguing that the Electoral College methos is not democratic in a modern sense.\" (Source 2, 15). So one would have to ask if the source is even reliable if it contradicts itself. In addition, even if they usually vote \"candidates don't spend time in states they know they have no chance of winning, focusing only on the tight races in the 'swing' states.\" (Scource 2, 13). This shows that states with more electoral votes will have more power over the people. Clearly, the Electoral College is a problem and popular vote is a much better way to vote.\n\nFurthermore, because some states old more power than others wen it comes to elections, presidents often ignore the \"smaller\" states looking only for votes. For example, \"During the 2000 campaign, seventeen states didn't see the candidates at all, including Rhode Island and South Carolina, and voters in 25 of the largest media markets didn't get to see a single campaign ad.\" (Source 2, 13). Candidates are not interested in the states, in the people, who do not give them enough votes. This is why the Electoral needs to be abolished and replaced with popular vote elections.\n\nMoreover, just because a president wins the campaign, does not mean that the candidate won the people's votes, it only means that he won the Electoral College's votes. For example, in the 2000 election and the 1888 election, one party won even though majority of the votes went to the other. In the 2000 election, even though Gore had more popular votes than Bush, he still lost because he had fewer electoral votes. This shows that there is something broken in the system. Something that can't be changed and needs to be replaced. As you can see, popular votes are the way to go in such an important election like the presidential one with so much on the line.\n\nIn conclusion, the Electoral Colege needs to be replaced by popular vote elections because the Electoral College discourages people from voting for their prefered president, influences future presidents to ignore some states, and does not clearly reflect the views of the American people. The Electoral College might have been good in the past however, now it just complicated the process and is unfair. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author suggests that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dnager becuase the atmosphere is almost 07persent carbon dioxide. Venu is a very hot place.\"On the planet;s surface, temperature average over 800 degrees fahrenheit and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than we ecperience.\"On Venu's the condition are far more ectreme than anything us humans have encounter on earth .\n\nAs the student reads in the passage its say that \"Venus has the hottest surface temperatur of any planet in our solar system \". Many of the people reading this think that it is hot on earth but what we dont relize is that Venus is ver hot. Many of the people in the world think that Mercury would be the hottest because it is closer to the sun . Why are scientist even discussing further visits to Venus? Why the scientist are even discussing furth visits is because astronmers say that they are fascinated by Venus because it is well known for its Earth-like planet . ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" the author explains reasons why the human race should study the planet Venus. The author presents ways how NASA for example, is trying to gain knowlegde of thr planet and thinking of ways to make that happen. With saying the planet is very interesting the author provides counter arguements on why people shouldn't study Venuns, and that's because of thr many dangers it has. Even if the planet is dangerous, the author still suggests that studying the planet is worth the time, and it's presented by saying how alike Venus was like Earth, the very different atmospere it has, and finally how studying the planet can lead to new innovations for our own planet, Earth.\n\nThe first way the author suggests why Venus is interesting to study, is by saying desribing the different kind of atmospere it has. By starting of the author goes right into their idea by saying how the tempertures, pressures, and what we would call natural disasters are much different then the conditions on Earth. For example in paragrapgh 3 when the author say \"Venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system\", it makes the readers curious because they want to know why the conditions are very different. The author may include the dangers of the planet, but says them in a way the readers enage more curiousity on the planet. Which is why the author suggests the planet is worth studying because of it's difference.\n\nDespite the conditions of the planet Venus now, the author also includes that Venus was once similar to our own planet. In the article in paragraph 4 the author states that Venus is like \"Our sister planet\" and also that \"Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system\", and because of this he/she presents their ideas well it's just makes the idead of studying the planet more important. In the rest of the paragraph the author includes that Venus was onced covered in oceans and had various forms of life just like our own planet. By including this detail readers can see that studying the planet isn't only important because of the many differences it has, but because if it was once like our own planet, how would the planet just drastically change?\n\nFinally the last deatil the author includes to suggest that Venus is worth the time to study it, is by saying how many researchers are working on new innovations that would allow our own technology to last longer here on Earth. In the last few paragraphs mainly are about how NASA is working on new technology to be able to last long enough the dangerours planet, but in paragraph 7 the author implies that by gaining new information on Earth's sister planet helps the human race improve their daily lives when he/she states \"Systems that use mechanical parts can be made more resistant to pressure, heat, and other forces\". By making new technology to last long enough on the inhospitable planet, scientists can learn to make better technology to last longer on Earth.\n\nSo by including the details of how Venus has such different conditions, how it was once similar to the planet Earth, and how studying the planet can lead to new inventions for our planet, the author supports his idea that studying Venus is worth the pursuit. The author suggests that the details are not only fascinating, but also important in in learning how planets drastacially change. Because Venus now has a very hot and dangerous atmosphere, understanding that it was once like Earth, helps scientists know more about Earth. If Venus did have oceans and life, scientists can make new technology to better take of Earth so it doesn't end up dangerours and hot like Venus. The author suggusts that stuyding Venus is worth the pursuit because researchers or scientists can learn better ways on how to take care of Earth.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\", the author suggetst that studing Venus is worthy but also dangerous. The author tells us how Venus is \"one of the brightest points of light in the night sky\" and also the second largest plantet with the \"nickname misleading since Venus is actually a planet\". There so many things to learn about when it comes to different planets. It would be worthy to go study more things about plantets so we can know about them and maybe one day lots of people coud go on one of these plants without just being a scientist. The bad thing about is we still don't have the best ways to get there and back saflty.\n\nThere is 97 percent of carbon dioxide in Venus and plus more of a challeng is the clouds of highy corrosive and eve 800 degrees Fahrenheit. It makes it a little hard to be able to go on Venus because of all that. \"NASA is working on other approaches to studiying Venus. For example, osme simplified eletronice made of silicaon carbid have been tested in a chamber simulation the chaos of Venus's surface.\n\nstiving ot meet the challenge presented by Venus has value, not only becasse of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also becasue human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidation endeavors. Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded ot meet the very badges of imaination and innovation.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars seem like a great idea, it makes me excited for the future. While the idea sounds great it of course has its bad sides to it. Even though the idea may not be perfect the good does outweigh the bad. The problems that may come from the driverless vehicles comes from the drivers mistakes and not the maufacturer. The odds of an accident occuring are actually shortend due to the take away of possible human error. I am all for driverless cars and hopefully I can actually get one. The car in reality is just assisting me with driving and I can always take over the ride. The mistakes\n\nwould be on me unless the technology fails altogether, that means that a majority of the time it would be the drivers fault. The difference in the driverless cars and regular cars is just that the driverless car is easier to drive.\n\nWhile the idea does sound risky for driverless cars the cars is not actually driverless. The car is simply assisting with the ride and the human driver can take over at any time. This is actually more safe than regular driving. there is not only one human driver but now a mechanical driver that is helping with the drive. this lowers the risk of accidents now that there is a little reassurance. he article says that there was the idea of \"Traffic Jam Assistance\" by BMW in 2013. That same idea is still coming and being done at a higher level, instead of just being used to assist in a traffic jam now the car will assist\n\nyou wherever you decide to go.\" The Google Car simply announces when the driver should be prepared to take over\"(7). The cars are still using the drivers but just giving the drivers a little help. the argument in the article says, \"Why would anyone want a driverless car that still needs a driver? wouldn't srivers get bored waiting for there turn to drive?\"(8) Most adults do not consider driving to be fun in the first place, so the driverless car most likely would not take any fun from them. The driving assistance is not mandatory, so turning off the assistance is likely an option. if the driver really wants to drive then they always have the option to drive. The driving asistance brings a new option to people that need to do other tasks besides driving. \" Such displays can be turned off instantly when the driver needs to take over Something not available to drivers trying to text with a cellphone. In this way, the in-car system is actually a safety feature, and safety is a big concern\" (8). The driverless cars ar bringing even more saftey than before.\n\nIn conclusion, the driverless cars are an even better option than the traditional ways of driving. The new cars are bringing more safety, and giving a easier option to driving. These vehicles aare not taking away the joys of driving but adding value to driving. This could make driving seem less like a chore and more fun than before. The laws against the driverless vehicles should be lifted and more car companies should consider this as an option, it is the best way to go. The world is moving forward and old ideas are going away to make life easier, better and more safe. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author of this passage has supported his claim that Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers extremely well. The reasons he supports himself well is by stating how Venus was probably the most Earth-like planet in our solar system and how it would be a good challenge for scientists to accept.\n\nIn paragraph four, the author asks this question, \"If our sister planet is so inhospitable, why are scientists even discussing further visits to its surface?\" The author answers the question by saying how Venus might have been like Earth. This statement sparked curiosity among the scientists, \"Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth.\" With this statement, scientists are eager to find out if this is true, and if it is, what happened to the life forms? The author proves that Venus being similar to Earth is worth the dangers. Knowing what happened to the life forms on Venus may help prevent the same disaster happening on Earth.\n\nThe main dangers of visiting Venus is the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the extreme surface temperature, and the unbelivable atomospheric pressure. To continue research on Venus, scientists would have to get up close. The author uses the word \"challenge\" instead of \"risk.\" This describes how pursuing Venus would be innovational to mankind. The author supports this claim by talking about how researchers are testing new technology to continue work on Venus. \"Many researchers are working on innovations that would allow our machines to last long enough to contribute meaningfully to our knowledge of Venus.\" When scientists achieve this goal and do research on Venus, who knows what is next in space exploration. Venus being a challenge to study is worth the dangers because if scientists conquer this, they will be able to conquer anything.\n\nIn conclusion, the author supported their idea extremely well with concrete evidence that exploring Venus is worth the risk. With the satement that Venus could have held life forms and water shows that studying this planet is neccessary. Also, when we study Venus, it will prove that humanity can face any challenge that comes its way. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "There's always that new thing that comes out and everyone decides that since everyone else is using it that they should join onto the bandwagon. There trying to invent cars that are driverless but they still will need assistance in certain areas. There are cars now that are able to be driven with assistance and they're perfectly fine. Making these cars is a cool idea for physically disabled people who can't necessarily drive, but for people who can drive and aren't physically disabled, it's just laziness.\n\nI think the development of these cars isn't all that great for people who aren't physically disabled. People now, are lazy and they think that since they're coming out with cars that drive themselves, they can just be potatos and sleep while the car takes them to their destination. I, personally, don't think that's a great idea. These cars should be sold, when they get invented, to people who are physically disabled because they need more help driving than anyone else.\n\nIf they make these cars, something can go seriously wrong with the car if someone bought it. People could die from these cars if they go out of control. Driverless cars' systems could mess up and something could go seriously wrong and the company who made that car could get sued. Like it says in the passage, \"Google has had cars that could drive independently under specific conditions since 2009\" meaning that if someone bought a car from Google, and something messed up and Google didn't explain the conditions to the buyer of the vehicle, Google could get seriously hammered with thered money. Companies would be losing millions and millions of dollars if these cars were to mess up.\n\nThese cars being made should be limited to very few per state. The people of the vehicles that buy the cars should have a 10 year warranty on the car. If something goes wrong and it results in death or injuries, they should get all money back and the company needs to pay for funeral expenses and hospital bills. The amount of cars per state should be at most 15 cars but they should be spread out among the state.\n\nIn conclusion, these cars should be sold to physically disabled people. People buying these cars and the vehicles going out of control could result in death and injuries. Limiting the cars per state would be a good idea. Basically, I think these cars shouldn't be made. If they do get made and getting sold, it should be sold to only physically disabled people. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "A person who thinks that the Face on Mars is a alien is not right because I the scientist knows that it's not aliens because we have research on it. Even though it may look like an ailen it's not, it is just a natural landform.\n\nIn papragraph seven it states on April 5 1998 that the scientist took a picture ten times sharper than the original Viking photos. Alo it revealed on a JPL web site that it was just a natural landform. Also that there was no alien monument after all.\n\nIf the person who still thinks it was created by aliens is stupid because NASA has proof the it is a natural monument. I would show them the photos and have proof that it was. Anyways they would be able to see it way better in the picture and see that i was right.\n\nIn paragraph 12 it says that the Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa-landforms common around the American West. \"The lava dome that takes the form of an isolated mesa about the same height as the Face on Mars.\"\n\nIn conclusion, a face created by aliens and put on Mars is unrealistic. It had to be God or just a natural lanfrom. NASA has proved it in 2001. They also have pictures of the landform. Therefroe it was not aliens. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus,\" the author does a good job of portraying how Venus is worth being studied despite its dangers. They talk about the different dangers in studying Venus, and they also talk about why it is so interesting and why it would be worth studying further.\n\nThe author shows this through the text because they clearly state why Venus is considered so dangerous and also why it is so interesting. For example, in paragprah 3, \"A thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide...clouds of corrosive sulfuric acid...temperatures average over 800 degress fahrenheit...atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater that what we experience on our own planet.\" These are some examples of the dangers that are presented when trying to study Venus. Despite the dangers, Venus would be worth looking into because it provides new information and a greater knowledge of what environments are like on other planets, for example, in paragraph 4, \"Venus still has some features that are analogous to those on Earth. The planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and craters.\" These are some examples of why we should look more into Venus because it has similar features to Earth and it is interesting to figure out why or how they are similar. The author proves their point by explaining that these dangers could potentially be worked around. In paragraph 7, \"Some simplified electronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating the chaos of Venus's surface and have lasted for three weeks in such conditons.\" This is showing that while Venus may be very dangerous to observe, there are advanced technologies out there that can lower the risk that comes with studying this planet. As the author stated in paragraph 8, \"Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagaination and innovation.\" What the author is trying to get across in this line, is that we should not limit ourselves or limit how much we can know or see solely based on something being too dangerous, when there are innovations out there to make it possible.\n\nThese are some of the examples of how the author demonstrates his ideas on why we should study Venus despite the dangers that it presents. The author did a good job presenting his ideas, as shown in the text and examples provided.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Autonomous cars are the cars of the future.\n\nThey will be able to drive themselves without any human interaction needed.\n\nAutonomous cars would be far more intelligent than any human driver, preventing numerous crashes that are due to driver discraction.\n\nAutonomous cars will forever change the way people commute.\n\nAutonomous cars would change the way people commute to and from work.\n\nThey would also change the way people travel.\n\nWith no human needed at the wheel, autonomous us cars can make traveling long distances a lot more enjoyable.\n\nIt would also allow the human occupants to do others things rather than just sit and look out the window.\n\nAutonomous cars are also a lot smarter than the average human driver.\n\nThis comes from the fleet of sensors that are stored on-board. These sensors include cameras, GPS, inertial motion sensors, automotive radar, and the most important of all, LIDAR.\n\nLIDAR uses laser beams to map the area around the car.\n\nThis generates and 360 degree 3-D model of what is happening around the car.\n\nIn the article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming\", the author points out many good atributes of the autonomous car.\n\nThe author claims that autonomous cars would use one half of the fuel used by the taxis of today.\n\nLess fuel used could mean less toxic emmissions and a cleaner environment.\n\nThe author also states that the autonomous car would have more flexibility than a bus.\n\nToday, a bus runs along a predetermined route.\n\nA public-transportation system that used autonomous cars would be far better for those pepole who do not want to stay along that predetermined route.\n\nAutonomous cars will also be a lot safer.\n\nThe article reports that Google's fleet of autonomous cars have driven more than half a million miles and have not had an accident.\n\nThe autonomous car would be a lot safer for the people riding inside but also for the people around it.\n\nAutonomous cars are able to see everything that is going on in its sphere of influence.\n\nThis is something a human driver could not do because we do not have a 360 degree range of vision.\n\nThe autonomous car is driving its way into our everyday lives.\n\nIts will make the world a safer and cleaner place to live in.\n\nThe autonomous car will change the way people commute forever. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article \"Making Mona Lisa smile,\" the author describes how a new technology called the Facial\n\nAction Coding System enables computers to identify human emotions. This is very vaulabe and could be great for classrooms. For example, if you smile when a web ad appears on your screen,a similar ad might follow. But if you frown, the next ad will be diffrent \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored,\" Dr. Huang predicts. \"then it could be used to modify the lesson, like an affective human constructor.\"\n\nthe facial expressions for each emotion are universal,\" obeserves Dr. Huang, \"even though individuals often show varying degrees of expression\" (like not smiling as broadly). using video imagery, the new emotion-recognition software tracks these facia; movements-- in a real face or in the painted face by mona lisa.\n\nin fact we humans peform this same impressive \"caculation every day. for instance, you can probaly tell how a friend is feeling simply by the look on her face.\n\nOf course, most of us would have trouble actually describing each facial trait that conveys happy, worried, etc. Dr. Huang observes that artists such as Da Vinci studied human anatomy to help them paint facial muscles precisley enough to covey specific emotions. His new computer software stores similar anatomical information as electronic code. Perhaps Dr. Huang's emotion algorithms are a different sort of \"Da vinci code.\n\nwe should really give, Facial Action Coding System a chace because\n\n\"most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication,\" notes Dr. Huang. \"So computers need to understand that,too.\" ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Conspiracy theorists think that the Face was built by aliens. However, they are wrong. They are wrong for many reasons. One reason is as simple as can be and that is that there is no proof that aliens have ever touched foot on to one of the galaxy's planets. The Face is just a natrual landform.\n\nIn addition, scientists have already come to the conclusion that the Face is just a Martian mesa. \"Only this one had unusal shadows that made it look like an Egyptian Pharoah\" (2). This proves that it is just unusal for a Martian mesa to look like the one on Mars. \"Martian mesa, common enough\"(2) this proves that Martian mesa's are common and not unusal.\n\nPlus in the pictures the Face is not the only mesa around. There are 10 different mesas. If there are ten mesas in one picture of Mars who knows how many mesas are on Mars(5). It is just a fluke that one mesa happens to look like an Egpytian Pharoah.\n\nAlso Is says in the story that \"what the picture actaully shows is the Martian equivalent of a butte or mess--landforms common around the American West\"(12). Garvin says \"It reminds me most of Middle Butte in the Snake River Plain of Idaho\"(12). There is buttes and messas on Earth what makes conspiarcy therorists think that there can not be natrual ones on Mars to. The fact the conspiracy theorists actaully belive that aliens built the Face is a joke.\n\nThe Face is a natrual landform on Mars that happens to look like a face. We know this becasue scientists have proven it. We also know this because there are messas on planet earth. Lastly we know this because they cant prove that aliens ever stepped foot onto mars or even constructed a messa. The Face is a fluke. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Facial Action Coding System is one of the new technologies of this century that is very complex and futuristic. It uses algorithims and muscle knowledge to discern the emotion of people in reality, photos, and other facial sources as well. The system can calculate how much you're happy, sad, suprised, and angry. Knowing other people's emotions is a great tool and can be used in many different situations. This new technology is good for a lot of things, and being used in a classroom is one of them.\n\nStudents need to be focused and engaged at all times in the classroom because if they are neither engaged, nor focused then they will struggle with learning new things and excelling in and out of the classroom. A computer in a class constantly scanning students' faces could become a distraction, but it would solve more problems than it could create. These days students are more vulnerable to distractions, and there are a lot of uncontrollable factors they are standing against. Some do not get enough sleep, some do not get enough to eat, and some do not have good health, whether that be mentally, socially, emotionally, or physically. These factors can take a toll on their ability to focus and be receptive to new information being taught in the classroom. They easily can become \"confused or bored\"(D'alto 6) or even distracted in a class, but if there was a way to track the behaviors that coincide with those emotions then it would be easier to assist the students. With the computer scanning their faces students emotions would be much more clear, and, as D'alto said in paragraph 6, the needed adjustments could be made to help students pay attention so they can learn.\n\nMany teachers find it hard to keep their lesson plans exciting and engaging because of their lack of resources, but with this computer it would be easy to recieve real feedback from students emotions on what they like and dislike. Moreover, even though the computer might present itself as a distraction in the beginning over time it would become a useful tool for the classroom, and be a huge asset for both students and teachers. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Everyday the world makes advances in the frield of techonology. But what would the world look like with driverless cars? The results can be only one of two outcomes, a world that is a ittle bit easier or a world of complete chaos. Driverless cars only make for more lawsuit cases, job loss, and dangerous glitches. Yes, the correct, safe technology could eventually be worked out and perfected, but that calls for trial and error, a risk the world should not take. Driverless cars are not something the world is ready for and this will only cause more problems.\n\nAn accident in a driverless car has occured, and who is to blame the owner or the manufacturer? Driverless cars are just lawsuits waiting to happen. The owner nor the maufacturer are going to want to take the balme when things go wrong. This then leads to a long drawn out court case of several individuals wasting time and money on something that could have been prevented. Several accidents happen everyday between cars with drivers, but there is already a set way on how to handle these accidents. Driverless cars will have to have a whole new set of rules and regulations. Just as the article states, there will need to be a new set of laws initiated to handle liability. The only problem, no one wants to be liable for wrong doing. But there is a simple solution, forget the driverless car and let the driver do the work.\n\nThe next issue with the driverless car is the fact that it will only create job loss. The economy already struggles with job loss as it is and with driverless cars it will only suffer more. The car will of course bring in engineers to work out glitches and fix software, but what about mechanics and taxi drivers? Sergey Brin elaborated on how he felt the driverless car would create a whole new form of public transportation. The mechanics will be replaced by engineers, and only visited every so often, if at all. The taxi system will be jsut about extinct, no taxi driver will be needed because the car will drive itself and give the passenger plenty of warning when needing assistance. This new technology will only destroy what is already working conveniently now.\n\nFinally, all around the world there are struggles with technology. In the case of a driverless car, what happens if the car begins to glitch? There have been several cases in which a company has released a \"perfected\" product only to have it glitch or mess up in the long run. No matter how many test there are, you can never be sure that the car is one hundred percent safe. There is also no promise that a car with a driver is one hundred percent safe either, but at least that person has control. Why should someone trust a car with their life? There are so many things that could go wrong at any moment. There are hackers, glitches, and a whole list of technolgy failing things. The engineers at Berkley have made advances with a magnetic road, but the magnets could easily malfunction at any time. A car with a driver in full control is the best bet, driverless cars are just to risky.\n\nThere are so many amazing things the world has done with technology, but a driverless car is just not one of them. There are to many faults that could occur, and people's lives could be the consequences of these faults. With all the hackers and glitches out there, people can harldy trust that their cell phone will work at times, so why would anyone trust a car? A driverless car is a big risk, accidents will happen they happen with drivers behind the wheel. These accidents will only cause huge, drawn out lawsuits. Also a driverless car will take jobs away from the people. Just remember the next time you are asked to support a driverless car say no. Do not let a car make the decision of life or death for you, choose to drive the car yourself. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The use of technology to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is valuable. The reason for this is that you can tell weather the person is really smiling or not. The computer software FACS (Facial Action Coding System) can classify 6 basic emotions like happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness.\n\nThe passage states that the computer contructs a 3-D computer model of the face;all 44 major muscles in the model must move like human muscles. Movement of one or more muscles is called an 'action unit. The passage also states that using video imagery, the new emotion-recongnintion software tracks these facial movments-in a real face or in the painted face of Monia Lisa. It can even identify mixed emotions. Each exspression is compared against a neutral face. The computer can tell weather you are happy or sad. Like in the passage it says that for an example, if you smile when a web ad appears on your screen, a similar ad might follow. But if you frown, the next ad will be different. A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored, then it can modify the lesson like an effective human instructor.\n\nThe evidence from this passage shows that the use of this technology to read the emotional exspressions of students in a classroom is very helpful. like stated in the claim and passage \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored, then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\"", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\", it speaks on a new technology called the Facail Action Coding System that can tell precisley what emotion someone is feeling just by the structure of their face. I beleive this inavative technology has a meaningful role in our education system. Its just the matter of the way we implicate it into the daily regiment of such a tedious, repetative schedule. School can drag on for what seams like years for students and teachers alike. However, this technology has the potentail to provide an ever-changing lesson, constantly grasping the attention of young sponge-minded students.\n\nThe Facial Action Coding System could be set up around classrooms having scanning cameras on standby for each lesson. As the lesson goes on it can scan the faces of unatentaive students, waiting to be intertained and educated, and adjust the lesson plan accordingly. Once the computer finds a teaching style that bests suits the majority of the class, it can set up an algarytham that meets the requirements of students. This not only will increase test scores which raises funding, but will also create minds fillied with retained knowledge ready to face humanity's problems in the future. In the article, it states the technology creates a 3-D computer model of the face capturing all 44 major muscles in the face. This picture could be taken by all students the same time as yearbook pictures are taken. With having a model of every students face, the computer should have no problem recognizing emotoins in real time.\n\nThe Facail Action Coding System's capabilitys would shine brihgtest in special education classrooms. This technology could better help teachers and aids understand the emotions and thought process of their special needs students. It will alow much better communiation between the student and teacher resulting in a much healthier and rich relationship. Emotional stability and comfort are crucial in the process of learning. It allows for the knowledge students recive to be much more retainable. It also readys students to apply their knowledge and common sense in real life situations.\n\nIn conclusion, with the proper refinery of the technology and patcience, the Facial Action Coding System has a well deserved spot in public and private education. It is a tool that can guid the young impressionable mind to greatness. Its potential is limitless with its capability to individualize the learning process. The bond between students and teachers can do nothing but gorw and flourish in a learning enviroment the Facial Action Coding System may produce. The struggle of lost translation through non-verbal communication will fade away. This technology is the future and I fully support its ideals. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars, something everyone should look into right? Well I say no to that statement. I am clearly against the use of driverless cars. People, might often say,\" but we are becoming more advanced, why are you so against that?\". I am not against us becoming a more advanced civilization, but I just think that the cars are worthless and not a good idea, and here is why.\n\nDriverless cars, require you, the driver to still be alert, even though there is a computer driving it. This is because the comuter cannot travel through obstacles such as tough terrains, or bad roads that call for a,\" human's experience. So if the car is driven by a computer, that should actually make it able to handle any situation right? No, but yest people still want to produce it.\n\nThis is also a bad idea, because, think of the money that will have to be spent on creating all of these automobiles. This project could cost billions and billions of dollars just to equip the technology within the vehicle itself, let alone the cost to actually make the cars. The technology might not be an issue at all for many people around the world, but the money is deffinately an issue, the taxes and monthly revenues might go up even higher, just to fund the project to make these cars.\n\nFinally, cars should not be driver less, because,they cost way too much money, which it states in the article that,\" radar was a device on a hilltop that cost two hundred million dollars\". If this is true, then think about all of the money that will be paid in the future, due to the many of advancements in technology. The cars still call for a driver's touch, so the thing is that these cars are not fully able to drive without someone, and it is just a waste of time and money, to make something that still has to require that a human opperate and control it. Also, if an accident occures, then who is to blame, shuley not the manufacture, they weren't in the car, but wait their technology was. If an accident happens, then this could cause problems between people and the manufactures because the technolgy was the on in control of the car, but yet the person was in the car fully capable of driving it at the time, so exactly who is to blame for the incident.\n\nHere is why cars should not be driverless, because they cost way too much money. They also need you to be alert at all times just in case there is an obstacle in the road. And finally, they could cause problems between manufactuers and people, because if an accident happens, then who is to blame for it. Simple cars, should not be driverless", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "As it shows in the article \"In German Suburb, Life Goes On Without Cars\", towns or cities like the experimental town of Vauban, Germany, are capable of continuing life without the added stress of owning a car and lowering the greenhouse emissions caused by them. Although the majority of the citizens do not own a vehicle, there are about 30 percent who do, and those who don't, either ride a bicycle or on what little amount public transportation there is. Out of the 70 percent of Vauban's families that do not own a car, 57 percent sold theirs to move there.\n\nAreas all around the world are beginnig to do the same as Vauban. Creating areas that do not require vehicles mainly due to the amount of greenhouse gas emissions that are causing the majority of the worlds climate change. Even in Paris they are beginning to cut back on vehicle usage due to large amounts of smog. In 2014, Smog in Paris measured 147 micrograms of particulate matter (PM) per cubic meter which is more than other European capitals with Brussels at 114 and 79.7 in London. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Making this use of technology to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is not valuable because some students like to keep their emotions to thereselves. Another reason is some students have more of a serious face so you can't tell their emotions. Last reason is people have mixed emotions.\n\nSome people like to keep their emotions to their selves because they dont want people to know whats going on. An example from the article is \"Most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communcation.\" This means that some human don't like to communcate especially with their emotions.\n\nSome students have more of a serious face, so you cant tell whether their happy or sad. An example from the passage is \"For instance, you can probably tell how a friend is feeling simply by the look on her face.\" This means that you can tell when a person is happy or sad, but some people can have serious face, but can really be happy in the inside.\n\nSome people have mixed emotions. which means like mood swings etc. An example from the passage is \"By weighting the different units, the software can even identify mixed emotions.\" This means that the person can either be sad, happy, serious, or mad.\n\nTherefore the use of technology to read the emotional expressions of stuudents in a classroom is not valuable because some students want to keep their emotions to their selves.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author in this story is trying to explain to us that venus is worth studying\n\nand exploring but they dont really touch on the why they just explain to us why we cant get there. Such as in paragraph 3 the author says \"A thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets Venus\". Also the article states\n\n\"on the planets surface averages around 800 degrees fahrenheit\" which is hot.\n\nNow they do touch on why we should explore it but its all just curiosity they said \"long ago venus was proably covered largely in oceans and could have supported various forms of life\". Now it is intriuging maybe there was life and maybe there was oceans there but if the only way to prove that is risking a life of our own its not worth it, not until we know for sure we can keep those astronuants safe.\n\nIn conclusion the author did not support his claim that we should investigate venus more closely well. There is more things that should make us want to stay on earth than explore venus. The author should add more detail about how safe the astronaunts will be or the rovers.\n\nI mean if\n\nit was your son or daughter who\n\nwanted to go explore venus but it wasn't 100 percent safe would you let them go? ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "To state senator i'm argue is that we should keep the Electoral College because it's a place where we vote on President and Vice President,and the place where we count the votes,and the Electioral College process consists of the selection of the electors. Reason number one is it's the place where we vote on President and Vice President because it's in the Constitution as a compromise between election of the President by a vote in congress. And election of All the soon President by a popular vote of qualified citizens. Reason number two is the place where we count the votes is because a majority of 270 electoral vote is required to elect the President. And when we vote for our candidate we are actually voting for your candidate's electors. And each of the candidate running for President in our state has his or her own group of electors. And reason number three is the Electional College process consists of the selction of the electors and that is my thrid reason is because were states's entitled allotment of electors equal the number of members in it's congressional delegation:and one for each member in the House of Representatives plus two for you senators. And this are all my three reasons why we should keep the Electoral College. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "My position on the driverless car is against it. I am against it cause its a bad idea. There are so many things that could go bad. The cost for everything would go up; laws will have to be made and changed. I am against driverless cars for these reasons.\n\nFirst they wont have the same feeling of being behind a wheel and feeling in control. You will just sit there and have everything done for you. You will become lazy and not feel like you got to do anything; when the time comes that you need to drive you could be half asleep and get in an accident and serious loss or injury can occure.\n\nSecond if the car malfunctions whos to say it wont veere off and slam into the side of a wall or hit another car. When it does malfunction and you have to get it fixed it would take longer and would cost more. It would take longer because the mechanic would have to know more about the car and how to fix more technology based stuff. It would cost more because its gonna take more time and the parts are gonna be more expensive because of the time and resources used to make them.\n\nThird it would take forever for all the laws to change and get new ones. There are already states that wont even let them test these types of cars. Also if they do get passed and everything is going good and one accident happens that involves the loss of people due to malfunction then people will get angry and want to ban them. People will blame the technology not the people using it\n\nSo in conclusion im against driverless cars. Im against it because so many things could go wrong. Not just that but it would cost the people and the companys more to manufacture and buy the car. Also laws would have to be changed and new ones made which will take a long time. This is why im against the idea of driverless cars.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Would you still buy a driveless car even if they can be dangerous? They need alot of modifiers to keep them going. But in reality they eventually might need fixed or they could go out while you are driving, then what are you going to do? Would you want a car that might mess up,or maybe even an upgrade? How are they driveless if you have to take control when you reach complicated traffic or lets just sy pulling out of your driveway? Lets look at more details to see if you really would want a driveless car.\n\nTo start off you need sensors while you are in control of the car but the sensors also let you know when you hvae to take over. So now that you have control when are you ever going to relax again? When do you know when the car will be driveless again? It will not be until you get back to the speed of 25 mph because that is the only speed it can go up to. But the question we all ask is \"Who will be responsible if there was an accident\"? Really it would be partially\n\nyour fault and the manufactures because most of the time you are the one in control not the car. It would also be the manufactures fault because they built the car and their parts on the car messd up.\n\nSo now knowing all the facts would you still buy a driveless car,or would you drive a car that you can drive manually by yourself? Ask yourself:\n\n- Would I trust the car if I bought it?\n\n- Would I be happy with my purchase?\n\n- Will I ever get a brake from driving?\n\nSo honestly you tell me would you buy a driveless car knowing the facts?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The auther supports the idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers very well. He gives very good point and tells us why we should study Venus given the dangers that come with. He says, \"On the planet's surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater then what we experience on our own planet.\" This quote is is talking about the dangers that might come. He is showing us that Venus is not like earth and will be hard to study.\n\nIn paragraph 3, the auther says, \"Venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system, even though Mercury is closer to our sun. In this sentence he is giving another danger to look at. The auther says that it is too hot and is a challange that they have to face.\n\nThe reason that he gives us of why it is imortant to study Venus despite of all the dangers is that there might have been life in Venus. In paragraph 4, The auther states, \"Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life.\" This is imortant because we don't know if there was life on Venus. The auther supported the idea that studying Venus is a worth pursuit desite the dangers it presents.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "With all this talk about greenhouse gasses, you think to yourself \"What can i do to change all of this?\". It's not as hard as you think. Some cities in foreign countries and this one are actually giving up their licence (short term or long term) so that the can walk, bike, carpool, or take public transportation rather than taking their own car. This is a great thing, especially with global warming and such. Some advantages of limiting car usuage can be: a less stressful and safe life, a reduction in harmful gasses, and a healthier lifestyle.\n\nWhen you walk around your town (depending on the size of it) you see a lot of cars. You have to walk around on the sidewalks and worry about the fact that a small mistake by a driver can end your life. But in a city that has no cars driving around, you don't have to worry about that at all. You can not worry about how much the gas prices are because you may be car pooling or taking the bus. In \"\n\nIn German Suburb, Life Goes On Without Cars\"\n\nby Elisabeth Rosenthal, she asked a citizen on what she thought of the no car law, she said \"When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way.\" (line 3), she saw how having no fast-moving hunks of metal can be a very stressless situation. A community that doesn't have this stress can worry about other things now.\n\nIt's often talked about in the news. Greenhouse gasses. Global warming. We hear about all the time and how it's affected by emissions of cars. How could we avoid it? Simple, we stop driving around so much. Cars in Europe are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions, and we in the United States make up 50 percent of it (Elisabeth Rosenthal, line 5). It's especially bad in Paris, where the gasses are so bad that there was 5 days of smog, only rivaled by Beijing, China the most polluted city in the world (Robert Duffer, line 14), which it's so bad in Beijing the citizens of the city have to wear masks covering their noses and mouths to protect themselves from the harmful gasses. It's horrible that people have to live in such horrible conditions.\n\nIf you gave up driving to everywhere you go, you wouldn't just help the world with greenhouse gasses, you'd also be helping yourself. People nowadays sit at home watching TV and snacking. But do you know how much walking and biking could do to help the health of people. This would be the case if there was a limitation on driving cars. Getting exersize is also a great stress-reliever. Also it helps with the nasty smog that's been mentioned. People wouldn't be breathing in harmful gasses if there was a limitation or ban to car usage in most contries. Air pollution effects all of us as human beings.\n\nMost of us can't think of a society without cars, but it's very possible. We can, however, make a society exactly like that to some extent. Running around screaming about global warming won't do much unless you take action. Not only will it help the Earth to have better air, it can help lead a more stress-free, safe life and a healthier one that'll only need you to walk or bike to some places. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author claims that Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers because venus might once have been like earth and could be visited in the future. In the article the author gives information about the planet, why scientists want to study it, and possible approaches on studying venus.\n\nIn paragraph 4 the article says, \"Astronomers are facinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system. Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth.\" It then goes on to say, \"Today, Venus still has some features that are analogous to those on earth.\" In order to study Venus, NASA is coming up with ways to study Venus without risking any lives. One such example is a vehicle that would hover about 30 miles above Venus's surface. Another method is simplified electronics that have been tested in Venus-like conditions.\n\nIn conclusion, humans may soon be able to study Venus more closely and maybe one day put humans on the Evening Star. It is yet to be known when this might happen but with new technology, or maybe old technology, it is a possibility not worth giving up on.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The development of a driverless car is a stunning concept. Though it may seem like a wonderful idea, the negative out-weighs the positive when it comes to this. The amount of problems that can come out of this is not worth the risk. From health risks to the price, negative results from the driverless car are iminate. The development of driverless cars will have negative results.\n\nOne way that something tragic can come out of this is the safety. Without the skill of a human at the wheel people are at the mercy of the cars intelligence. Manveuring around crashes and contruction will become an immensely more tedious job. Also the dangers of the car not knowing the terain of a certain place could also pose as a major safety risk. Also, with a vehicle with this amount of technology, it is bound to develop glitcthes. Things like this put the passengers lives at risk.\n\nAnother negative of the driverless car would be the price. With an advanced car like this it would only be accessable to the wealthy. Alienating a large group of potential buyers. With this information a person can assume that it would not catch on and die off quickly. Also, the fuel of the vehicle would also be extremely expensive. Making the car a burden to have if an individual is taking a road trip.\n\nThe manufactureres would also have to consider what the people think about it mentally. Some people actually enjoy driving a vehicle. Those people would be less likely to purchase such a car. This would make it even more difficult to sell the car. Since most people are already lazy, making a driverless car would not help in their favor. Driverless cars would take the work ethic right out of people. Making people more dependent on technology is not a positive thing.\n\nTo conclude, Driverless cars would have a multitude of negative results. Although it may be nice to not have to drive, the risks that are factored in makes it not worth it. Considering the safety of the buyers is what automakers should put first before anything. Cars like these pose a great number of cocerns for the country. Driverless cars may be a thing of the future, but this is a future we should try to avoid. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In this story they talk about exploring space they siad that venus is called evening start somethimes . At night you can see it its the brightest one in the sky. Venus is the seound plant from the sun. And it has proved a very challeging place to examine more closely.\n\nVenus is referred to as earth too because its the cloest to the planet its about the same size as earth. Sometimes we are close to mars and sometimes to venus thier be some days around the corner. No space ship has touched down in venus more then three decades. On venus temperatures are average of 800 degrees fahrenheit and the atmospheric pressure is 90 more times grater then what we experience in earth. Its has the hottest surface temperature of any plant in our solor system. Venus was covered in largely with oceans and could of had life there.\n\nNASA are working on approaches on studying venus . A old project is looking back on an device called mechanical computers those devices where first envisioned in 1800s and they played a role in 1940s during world war 2 .Thier are builed useing gerars and levers. They are striving to meet the challenge.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear Senator,\n\nI am not alone when I say that I'm not in favor of keeping the Electoral College. According to the Gallup poll taken in 2000, over 60% of voters prefer a direct election, but Congress does nothing to change that. Keeping the Electoral college is unfair to the people of the United States. We should not keep the Elctoral College because, when Americans are voting, they are not voting for their president but for a slate of electors; the legislature is responsible for picking our electors not the people; and the process of a tie in the Electoral College is too unfair to the people.\n\nWhen Americans are voting for a new president, they want their opinion to count. The popular vote explains what the people wanted for president, but that's not what the people are voting for. When we are voting for president, we are instead voting for a slate of electors; they in turn vote for the president. Voters can't control who the electors vote for, and this gives the a small say in voting for the president.\n\nIn the 2000 presidential race Al Gore received more individual votes thjan George W. Bush, but Bush won the election due the amont of elctoral votes over powering the popular votes. This completely goes against what the people want. The state legislatures are responsible for picking our slate electors; these electors have the right to defy the will of the people. Electors have refused to vote for their party's candidate and cast a vote for whomever they please.\n\nDuring a presidential election, one of the most worrying things to receive from an electoral vote is a tie. When there is a tie, the election is sent to the House of Representatives. Due to the fact that many voters vote one party for the president and another for Congress, the House's selection will barely reflect the will of the people. Their votes can be the complete opposites of the people's vote. You could help us bring an end to the Electoral College.\n\nSincerely,\n\nPROPER_NAME ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Hoverboards, robots and driverless cars? This is technology we have invented in the new age. We are gifted with the presence of new technology every year and somehow we seem to abuse it or take it for granted. Which is why I believe we should not have driverless cars. We should not have these driverless cars because technology malfunctions all the time and because this technology can be abused. Let's journey into an idea that should remain in a mad scientist's lab.\n\nWe should not have driverless cars because technology malfunctions all the time in present day society. Paragraph 4 of the text talks about LIDAR, a program that keeps the car updated of it's 3-D surroundings. Being a driverless car, what if LIDAR stops working? Does the car sop working altogether? Or does this machine simply keep going with it's routine? This puts the driver in danger, the pedestrians in harm, and in all cases the other drivers on the road. This is a common technological malfunction that can happen to any driverless car anywhere in the world. The text in Paragraph 9 also touches on the same subject of the technology failures. As the text says, \" If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault- the driver of the manufacturer?\" This piece of evidence illustrates why a driverless car is dangerous. A simple technological malfunction can happen and it can put the customer at risk, and even the company.\n\nLastly, a driverless car should not be developed because this piece of technology can be abused. We see crimes around the world daily, monthly, and even yearly. We aslo see that these crimes are getting worse and worse over the time period. If we implement a driverless cars, who knows what limits and boundaries these crimes will break. These cars can be used for anything: drive-by shootings, hit and runs, and even kidnapping. Who is the car to say what is morally right and wrong? The car does not know and it may not ever know, which is why it needs to not be developed.\n\nIn conclusion, driverless cars do not need to be developed in the world. Driverless cars put people at risks with technology malfunctions and can tarnish a company's name with multiple lawsuits against it. Driverless cars also can be abused for multiple things. Society has made many technological advances, but this is one that needs to remain untouched. Maybe this is better for the sake of a company's fortune, or maybe it's better for the people of the world.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Well who doesn't think robots are cool right? But I personally do not like them nor do I want them to know my emotions. Here's some reasons why.\n\nFirst, the new technology \"Facial Action Coding System\" enables computers to identify human emotions. I do not want a robot to feel the need to be figuring out my emotions. It's just something humans wouldn't want.\n\nSecondly, what would be the point? It just doesn't matter what other students emotions are. In my opinion, I think it's irrelevant.\n\nThirdly, it would be useful for old acient painting to try to figure out there emotions. Other than that I dont think emotions of other students really matter. In plus who would want a robot in there personal space.\n\nInconclusion, overall I don't think im a big fan of this \"Facial Action Coding System\" theres really no purpose to it. Like if you find out your emotions what's it doing to you besides telling you. If it required a reward or if it benifited you then yes it would be amazing. But it doesn't so I don't really think it's neccesary. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I am for driverless cars, because they could be helpful, they seem safe, and they are already being used by Google. They could help people with disabilities that make them unable to drive or go where they need to go.\n\nFirst of all, they are using sensors in them to help navigate them. They are developing special roads, smart roads. There were test tracks built in the 1950's by General motors. They built a concept car that could run on a special track that was embedded with a electrical cable that sent radio signals to a receiver on the front end of the car. Engineers at Berkeley tried something similar. They used magnets with alternating polarity, so the car could read the polarities using the binary code. All of this was proved to be too expensive. They started putting sensors on the cars, postion-estimating sensors, a video camera mounted near the rearview mirror, four automotive radar sensors, a GPS receiver, and an internal motion sensor.\n\nSecond of all, they seemed far away from making a driverless car. Sebastian Thrun, founder of the Google Car project believes that the technology has finally begun to catch up to the dream. In 2013, BMW announced the development of \"Traffic Jam Assiatant.\" The car would be able to handle driving at speeds up to 25 mph, but special touch sensors makes sure the drivers keeps ahold of the wheel. Most of these cars are yet to be fully driverless, they can steer, accelerate, and brake on their own, but they all are designed to notify the driver when the rooad ahead requires human skills. Some manufacturers hope to bring in-car entertainment and information systems that use heads-up displays. Such displays would be turned off instantly when the driver needsto take over, this way the in-car system is acctually a safety feature.\n\nThird of all, The only problem is that there are laws prohibiting the uses and testing of driverless cars. Traffic laws are written with the assumption that the only safe car has a human driver in control at all time. California, Nevada, Florida, and the District of Columbia have led the country in allowing limited use of semi-autonomous cars. Manufacturers believe that more states will follow as soon as the cars are proven more reliably safe. Traffic laws will have to change, new laws will be needed in order to cover liability in the case of an accident. Automakers are still continuing with their work on the assumption that the problems ahead will be solved.\n\nTherefore I am for driverless cars, because they could be helpful, they seem safe, and they are already being used by Google. There's no telling what's to come from the future of driverless cars. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Facial Action Coding System,can read peoples expressions.\n\nShould this technology be used in classrooms to detect the emotins of the students?\n\nThis technology should not be used to detect the emotions of students. The article stated that this tech, could be used to detect when a student is getting tired or bored of the lesson. This would then allow the computer to liven the lesson up, as the text states directly, \"Then it could modify the lesson,like an effective human instructor.\" This line makes it seem like it(the FACS technology) would replace teachers in the classroom.\n\nTeaches do not need technology to tell if their students are bored, as the text says, people just know what the emotions of others are. The teacher would know when, and how to modify the lesson to keep their students interested, and engaged. Would we know what the technology would do to modify the lesson? Would the students just be able to be angry at the lessons until the computer just stops giving the student lessons? Using this tech is not an alternative to having a real person tell how you feel. The teacher can help you feel better because they know how you really feel, because they have empathy. The computer can tell how you feel, but it does not what it is like to feel, so in the end it can't really help.\n\nShould the FACS tech be used in the classroom? No, because the students need a teacher to help them feel better when they are frustrated or sad, not a computer that can only try and make them happy. It also seem sthat they want this tech, to replace our teachers,which would hurt the students more than it would help them.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.