Split (2)

train · 5.42k rows

messages listlengths 3 3
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In my opion in how i fell about the Facial action cording system enables in how the computers can help identify how people fell in tell the human emotions is i blive its some how can be real in some how not be real. for eaxample in the storey it shares in tells us how people use it in it worked on them i have also seen it done on most tv shows so that is why i think that this could or may work ought. I also think in blive that it can also be not real a wil for example i have not use it befor or on other peoople .Also it still queston me on how a computer thinks that it could some how read a person emotions. Also using this type of work on students in kids can also be not much of a good thing if you think about because yes some people do get sad in really upset but not everone knows why they are mad or why they fell mad in somtimes people can fell sad with ought eving knowing that they are sad or unhappy. We aslo have people who dont want people to know there sad which is why most people had there sadness with happyness to show that there not sad because they dont want others to know how they reallt fell inside as will .So in my own words to me it could mean a god thing but aso mean a bad thing as will to.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The idea of cars driving themselves has been fantacised for decades. Being able to get into your car and tell it where to take you has now become easier with the new technology available to us today. Like many new technological advances, there are both positive and negative aspects to consider. Self-driving cars seem dependable; however, they will cause more chaos than what they are worth.\n\nTechnology is constantly changing, meaning that older software quickly becomes aniquated to the point to where it will not function with the newer advances. This constant change could cause the self driving cars to grow aniquated as well, making them useless after a period of time. This tecnology is also very expensive. The article states that \"technology has begun to catch up to the dream\", but what happens when technology surpasses the idea of self-driving cars? The idea of self-driving cars mat just be a trend that the world will soon grow old from. All it takes is another new idea to shift all focus from self-driving cars to this other new trendy idea.\n\nWith all technology, comes tecnology problems. Wether it be that the system is overworked, internet connection drops, or batteries die. Tecnology is not very dependable, making trust for these self-driving cars miniscule. When actual humans are behind the wheel, there is room for less error. There is room for less error because that person had to take multiple tests just to be able to drive that car. Also, a human's reaction time has to be far quicker than that of a computer.\n\nThere is also the arguement of who to blame when this self-driving car gets into a wreck. The makers of these cars would advertise that their car is self-driving, but when their tecnology faults, they would blame the owner of the car. Then driving laws come into place with these new cars. \"Traffic laws are written with the assumption that the only safe car has a human driver in control at all times\" states the article. This is where the owner of these cars is going to suffer the most. Tecnology made by these big companies will regulate that the driver's hands will be on the wheel at all times, henceforth making them in \"control\" of the car at all times. That being said, the wreck that the self-driving car got into, will be the owner's fault.\n\nIn conclusion, self-driving cars are just a trend that many people like the idea of. These cars are too expensive for what they are actually worth. Collision faults will be blamed on the owner, and the cars will be unable to be fully sure that they will work the way this article presumes them to be. If these scientists wish to reduce the number of accidents on the streets, I know a lot of people who should not have their license, make the driving test harder, so that someone can't just go in there and pass. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article, \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus,\" The author explains why it would be a good idea to explore our neighboring planet of Venus. Despite all of the possible problems that can easily arise, the author claims it is a worthy pursuit. From evaluating the article personally, I believe the author supported his argument very well with even being able to counterargue many counterclaims by stating different innovations and different ideas that can make travelling to the \"Evening Star\" a reality.\n\nThe author claims it is important to study Venus due to it's striking similarities to Earth. The author states in paragraph 4 that scientists believe that Venus was once the most similar planet to Earth, once believed to probably be covered in oceans and probably even supported life. Even today, it is speculated that Venus has many land masses like ours such as mountains, valleys, and craters. The author also states in paragraph 4 that Venus can easily be our nearest option for a planetary visit considering how close it is.\n\nAlthough, the horrible conditions of the planet have not allowed any human made spacecrafts to land on Venus for more than a few hours before being either torn apart or simply returning. However, after this claim from paragraph 5, the author uses support from NASA to state how humans could still visit the planet, however, will have to only hover over it about 30 miles into the atmosphere to avoid getting into serious danger. The author claims that although these still are not perfect conditions, they will be suitable for humans to survive in. The author then goes on to compell the arguement that they would not be able to collect any samples or even photo or videograpghy due to it being dangerous or ineffective. He therefore states in paragraph 6 that if scientists are seeking to conduct a thorough mission, that they need to get up close and personal with the planet.\n\nThe author also states in paragraph 6 as well how many scientists take Venus as a challenge and are actually coming up with different innovations in order to tackle Venus' tough environment with a surface that can reach up to 800°F and the immense 90 times greater pressure than Earth. These technologies include mechanical parts like found in the first computer had in order to be more resistant to heat and pressure being made from silicon carbide, which when tested in a chamber that simulated Venus conditions, survived a staggering 3 weeks.\n\nLater, in paragraph 8, the author states that being presented a challenge to get to Venus has value. \"Not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiosity will likely lead us to many equally intimidating endeavors,\" the author states in paragraph 8. The author claims that if we are able to tackle an astonashing feat such as Venus who is our neighboring planet, then we have unlocked the key to tackling many greater challenges.\n\nIn conclusion, I believe the author supports his claims very well due to him being able to understand the dangers of the challenge. However, the author then was able to find different supporting facts and innovations that can make a trip to Venus by man possible and seem more appealing nevertheless. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The reason why people want to learnn more about venus is because is that its the closet planet compaired to earth in are solar system. Even with its dangerous conditions it shares many simularites to earth. It has things like valleys, mountains, and craters.\n\nThe reason however why we've never been able to get a closer look at it is be cause of is dangorus conditions. Things like valcanic europtions, earthquakes, and the contsant lighting storm make it difficult to gett anthing to land on the the ground. However the reason why scientist still wish sto study this planet is that it still would be somewhat possible to support human life.\n\nThere was even possibley one point when venus was the most earth like planet in our solar system. It may have even at one point when it could have been possible to support life and it might even had supported life at one point. This is probably why scientist strive to land something on it.\n\nThese are the reasons why the authors claims are very much a possibilty. Maby some day venus well be more like a countroy and become a tourist destinaition or just become a place for people to live. but we mont know unless we keep on trying.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "There have two sides to using this technology to read student's emotional expressions. Eckman has classified six basic emotions: happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear and sadness, and then associated each with characteristic movements of the facial muscles. Movement of one or more muscles is called an \"action unit\". New software has been developed that improves accuracy in perceiving the emotions of others. The new emotion-recognition software tracks thewe facial movements. By weighting the different units, the software can even identify mixed emotions. Moving your facial musclles not only expresses emotions, but also may even help produce them. The facial expressions for each emotion are universal, even though individuals often show varying degrees of expression. Most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication. In fact, these are the instructions for a face that looks happy. It's all about those muscular action units. They even indicate the difference between a genuine smile and a forced one. If using this technology to read, the people won't influence their negative feelings, and can manipulate the degree entirely. Each expression is compared against a neutral face. But the computer can't influence clearly the feelings because they have some feelings and emotionals are so hard to illustrate. And if not using that, the people can show their real emotion on their faces, to an expert, faces don't lie, these muscle clues are sometimes used to spot when a \"smiling\" politician or celebrity isn't being truthful. In fact, we humans perform this same impressive \"caculation\" everyday, you can tell how a friend is feeling simply by look on their faces. Most of us would have trouble actually describing each facial trait that conveys happy, worried, surprise... A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored. Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor. Studied human anatomy to help them paint facial muscles precisely enough to convey specific emotions. The Mona Lisa demonstration is really intended to bring a smile to your face, while it shows just how much this computer can do. The same technology can make computer animated faces more expressive. So computers need to understand that, too. We unconsciously imitate another person's facial expressions. Whoever thought that making faces could reveal so much about the science of emotions and developing better ways for human and computers to communicate. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Have you ever been told what your emotional expression is by a computer. A new software has been made that can recognize emotions. It has been made to develop better ways for humans and computers to communicate. The use of this technology to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is valuable.\n\nFirst, it constructs a 3-D model of the face and the muscels in the software must move like human muscles. It makes an exact replica of your face and your face muscles. It shows you your emotion by using the location of your face muscles. For example in paragraph 3 it states,\" Your frontalis par leteralis muscle raises your eyebrows when you're surprised.\"\n\nSecond, It can tell you if you have mixed emotions. It can calculate exact emotions while we can partialy do this. In paragraph 5 it states that \" You can probally tell how a freind is feeling simply by the look on her face. Of course, most of us would have trouble actually describing each facial trait that conveys happy, worried, etc.\" The computer can show you this.\n\nThird, The computer can help you by knowing what your emotion is. It can see when your happy looking at something so it can show you more stuff like that. It can see when your sad so it wont show you more stuff like that. It can see when your confused at something and so it can explain it to you differently so you wont be confused.\n\nIn conclusion, The computer constructs and exact replica of your face and your face muscles. It can tell you your exact emotion or mixed emotions. It can help you feel happy by showing you what you want to see and not showing you what you dont want to see. It can help teach you things that you differenly by showing it to you differently if it sees that you are confused. The technology to read a students expression in a classroom is valuable.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I know you may think that the face was made by aliens, but it isn't. How I know? Well in the article \"Unmasking the Face on Mars\" NASA lists a whole bunch of reasons against this alien conspiracy. Number one, it is probably just another Martian mesa, which are common around Cydonia. Number two, it looks like a regular landform due to comparisons to Earths landforms. Lastly, number three, sometimes the face isn't even there due to its missing shadows. Conspirators would probably think that NASA would hide evidence of alien acts but NASA is so confident that this is not aliens that they showed the face to the public. You're probably thinking: Why should I believe you? Do you have evidence? As in fact I do.\n\nNumber one, it's probably just another Martian mesa. Scientists have proven that there are a lot of mesa's around Cydonia, a region on Mars where the face is located. \"Scientists figured it was just another Martian mesa, common enough around Cydonia, only this one had unusual shadows that made it look like an Egyptian Pharaoh.\" In this quote from the text it reveals how the face, if it is just a Martian mesa, is actually rather common on Cydonia. In that quote it also reveals that the face only has \"unusual shadows\" that give the face an effect of looking like an \"Egyptian Pharaoh\".\n\nNumber two, scientists claim it just looks like a regular landform. \"What the picture acually shows is the Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa--landforms common around the American West. \"It reminds me most of Middle Butte in the Snake River Plain of Idaho,\" says Garvin.\" In this quote a man named Garvin has compared the face to some landforms on Earth. By comparing the face to a landform, it makes the face acually seem more like its just a regular landform.\n\nNumber three, sometimes the face isn't even there. \"Thousands of anxious web surfers were waiting when the image first appeared on a JPL web site, revealing ... a natural landform. There was no alien monument after all.\" Before this quote had even happened a man named Michael Malin and his Mars Orbiter Camera took a picture of the face only to realize it was just a regular landform. When the face was not in the picture that was supposed to be ten times sharper than the original Viking photo's proves that maybe the face is just a landform with unusual shadows for a face afterall.\n\nConspiracy theories believe that the face was made by aliens, but scientists have proven with research that that the conspiraters theory has a very big lack of credibility. Scientists have proven, number one, it is most likely just a Martian mesa with shadows for a face because Martian mesa's are common on Cydonia. Number two, its most likely just a regular landform due to its comparison's to Earths landforms. Number three, sometimes the face isn't even there because the shadows are gone. All of this resarch by NASA just proves that these conspriacy theories about aliens are wrong. Who do you believe now? NASA's research or a conspirators theory?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "A sudden surge in the use of technology has pushed humanity forward in technological advances and innovations. The idea of Driverless Cars are becoming a topic of more and more discussion and experimentation. The question, however, is not only when the Driverless Cars will be ready, but should they be put to use? The answer to that is \"no\".\n\nThough Driverless Cars have not been fully developed yet, the prospect of them being on the roads is daunting. Ther positive aspects of a driverless cars are that they use half the fuel of today's taxis and offer more flexibility than a bus. That, however, is about where the positives stop.\n\nSo far, modern technology has been able to develop a driverless car that can drive 25 miles per hour on its own, though it is not completely driverless. The driverless cars are able to navigate through easy driving situations, however, if it were to come to an accident, or contruction, the driver would have to maually take over. That leaves a lot of room for extra things that need to be worked out. One of those things being how a driver is notified to take over. Several ways have been developed, a few being that the driver's seat vibrates, the car tells the driver to take over, or all the displays in the car (for things lie texting, calling, etc.) will be turned off to notify the driver to pay attention to the road. But how much time would be needed to notify the driver of a potential accident?\n\nOther ideas have consisted of upgrading roads, however this costs a lot of money to install all upgrades and would instill too much reliabilty on technology. A solution to this was to make completly driverless cars, though that too would require enormous amounts of upgrades and money. Cars would need a constant 3D scan of the surrounding area to know where it was that other cars were, streets were signs were, and buildings were to name a few things. This is not only expensive but offers too much opportunity for error.\n\nHaving an all technology, automated car would also open cars up to a greater chance for tampering with cars, altering cars, or theft.\n\nFollowing all the doubts about automated cars, money, upgrades, there are still many unanswered questions, which would only be the beginning in addition to the confusion of consumers. Who has to buy the cars? Everyone? How much would they cost... to buy? To produce? What is the likelihood of a malfunction? How would the cars be repaired? Who would make the cars? Who is responsible for accidents that may occur? How would people be trained/taught to use these cars? Why do we even need automated cars?\n\nA sudden surge in the use of technology has pushed humanity forward in technological advances and innovations but in light of new inventions, the reliability on technology will become overwhelming. Driverless cars should not be put to use due to the many uncertainties, opportunities for error, public confusion, the need for new laws, and all the unanswered questions that pose a threat to the safety of the public.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The auther did an okay job esablishing this prompt about Venus an its worthy pursuit despite the dangers. My first example is that when writing a story you more so wanna speakm about the good than bad but in some cases its better to talk about the bad instead because when it comes down to it an you go through with the prompt the auther only talkes about the positive an not about the outcome of someone getting hurt witch i doub that would happen but always have that opion of knowing what could happen. in paraghraph 5 it talkes about the NASA is thinking about sending humans to Venus an its not telling about the risk in doing that what is soomething goes wrong an nobody knows what to do that can detect someones whole life.I just feel like this prompt dosent have enough information to be trying to get someones attention about studying Venus.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author talks about how Venus is called the Evening star because is one of the brightest points of light in the night sky and because is the second planety from our sun. It's a very challenging place to examine more closely.\n\nVenus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of density and size, and occasionally the closest in distance too. Earth, Venus, and Mars, our other planetary neighbor, orbit\n\nthe sun at different speeds this means that sometimes we are closer to Mars and sometimes to Venus.\n\nHe also talks about how humans have sent numerous spacecraft to land on Venus\n\nbut each mission was unmanned because no spacecraft survived the landing for more than a few hours this issue explains why not a single spaceship has touched down on Venus in more than three decades.\n\nVenus has a thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent of carbon dioxide that blankets it. But the most challenging are the clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere. The planet's\n\nsurface, temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit so this makes Venus a very hot planet the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater\n\nthan what we experience on our planet.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Based on the predictions of old movies, the cars of the future are way overdue. Flying cars should have begun littering the sky years ago. Though cars have not yet progressed enough to fly, they have made amazing progress in other areas. The concept of driverless cars may seem like something one could only imagine, it may soon become a reality. Several car companies are working to produce a car that can drive itself. Judging by the progress that has been made so far, these cars will be safe, feul efficient, and available soon.\n\nDriverless cars have shown to be a lot safer than cars with human drivers. The self-driving cars that Google has made have driven over half a million miles without crashing; however, the law does not yet agree with these vehicles. Very few states so much as allow these cars to be tested within their borders. The fear is understandable; these cars have not been proven to be 100% safe, but no car is 100% safe. Any car with a human driver is automatically in danger, because humans are not always reliable. there are thousands of deaths each year due to people texting while driving, driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol, and falling asleep at the wheel. Even if the driverless car had accidents, it would most likely have much fewer accidents than cars with human drivers would.\n\nThese driverless cars would be fuel efficient. Fuel efficiency is a big concern, partially because of the cost. Although gas prices are lower in this area now, they have gotten up to almost five dollars at times. Paying for gas can get very expensive, and this is due to the decreasing supply of fossil fuels. Since fuel is not something people have been able to cheaply manufacture, the world relies on a source that cannot replenish itself and is thus running low.The driverless cars will use almost half of the fuel of most regular cars. This would cut down on the expense and the pollution caused by fossil fuels.\n\nThese cars are not yet available; however, they will be soon. Since the 1950s, automakers have been working on ways to make a car that does not need a human driver. Many methods have been used, including cables and magnetic tracks. Since modifying the road was too expensive, the idea quickly changed to modifying the cars themselves. Modifying the cars to be able to function without a driver was not an easy task; many different types of sensors had to be placed all over the cars. One of the biggest issues with making cars completely driverless is dealing with issues such as navigating through worksites and accidents. The cars still require humans to take over during those situations. Many different car companies have come up with different ways to alert the driver when a situation arises that the car alone cannot handle.\n\nDriverless cars are no longer limited to one's imagination. Though they require some more work, they have already made outstanding progress. Within years, these cars could be available everywhere. These cars will be safe, feul efficient, and available soon.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "A study last year found that driving by young people have decreaseed over the years. Less people are getting there licensies and people are driving less miles everyday. Young people are starting to care less about cars. They are strating to use different types of transportation such as public transportation or even walking. There are advantages of limiting car usage like the reduction of green house gas emissions and smog and the less stress put on peoples lives.\n\nPassenger cars are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gass emissions in Europe. This is a huge percent due top cars. If there were less cars then the emissions of greenhouse gases would go down which is a big advantage. In Europe they are trying to reduce the greenhouse gas emissons by reducing the use of cars. The emissons from an increasing number of private cars are choking the cities. With limiting the car usage the cities would not be as polluted. Like Eurpoe Paris bans driving due to the smog. This happened after days of near-record pollution. An another advantage of limiting car pollution is that congestion went down 60 precent making peoples lungs healthier. Cars also make cities such as China filled with intensifying smog. Cars are making the particulate matter go up by a huge percent. For limiting the use of cars and using other tranposrtation this will limit the use of smog. Without the use of cars was a great opportunity to lower air pollution which was President Obamas goals. Limiting the usage of cars will also help people deal with stress.\n\nCars cause alot of stress for people. Weather the car is broken down or you just got into an accident. They are very dangerous for people who dont follow the rules in them. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I do not think that the author supported his idea to the fullest. He could have just done better because he never made it clear about his descion. there were just too much negatve about going to venus theres are 4 postive things about why we should go to venus. \"solar pwer would be plentiful , and radiation wouldnt exceed earth levels not easy conditions but survivable for humans .\n\nHe supported his argument very few places of the passage. The text states \"The planet has a surface of rocky sediment includes familiar features such as valleys and mountain. He also supported his argument with \"Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life . which means that the planet could be inhabitable by humans.\n\nHe made his argument worse by putting all of the dangerous stuff intot the text. The author says \"Humans have sent numerous spacecraft to land on this cloud-draped world. Each previous misson was unmanned.\"\n\nWhich means that it has been to difficult to go there for breif periods at a time. \" A thich atmosphere of almoost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets venus.\" Which means that it is very inhabitibal for humans.\n\nIf i had to guess on which side the author would have been for : try and explore the plane or Stop trying because it is too dangerous I would have to say that he is on the stop trying it is too dangerous side. I think this because compared to the postive stuff it says to venus it has a lot of bad facts and good reasons on why we shouldnt go there. in my mind i do not think that he got his point out enough to say he wants us to go to Venus .\n\nIn my opinion Venus is too dnagerous for us to survive there and live there. I think that exploring there is just a waste of money because \" each previous mission has been unmanned and you shouldnt just keep trying. the author believes that there should be money invested into the reseach of venus. I do not agree with him. And i feel as though we as humans should explore some where more inhabitable ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Those pictures you see aren't pictures of aliens and they are not prints that show that aliens have been through. In 1976 the Face on Mars picture was taken, but when it was taken the camera was through some clouds, so when it took the picture it was probably some shadow of the clouds. It even says the when this picture was taken it was a cloudy day \"it was winter in April '98 a cloudy time of year on the Red Planet.\"\n\nThe picture could just be some dust that has moved around a bunch of time at had made a face figure out of the dust and debre. The pictures also look different over time which was probably the dust and sand moving it all around. Plus there are really strong and heavy storms almost every single night at mars. so the dust, sand, and rocks are flying every where so that can cause disfiguer to anything. So before you jump to conclusion about it being aliens you should know more facts about what happens in mars on a day to day basis.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The face of Mars present in the region of the Red Planet called Cydonia. Isn't made of the made-up creatures called aliens. It's simply made from the rock there. In the following information will be able to support this claim.\n\nYes, the mission controllers back at the Jet Propulsion Lab must have been surprised when the face appeared on their monitors but that was very short lived. The scientists figured it was just another Martian mesa. That thanks to the shadows made it look like a face. And mesas are known to be quite common enough around Cydonia which is how they figured that out.\n\nSo a few days later NASA unveiled the image so everyone could see it. The authors reasoned that it would be a good way to engage the public and attract attention to Mars. So much that people started to think the Face was \"bona fide\" evidence of life on Mars. Conspiracy theorists stated that the Face was evidence\n\nthat NASA would rather hide from the public's view.While that was happening the defenders of NASA budget wished that there was an acient civilizatiob on the Red Planet.\n\nAlthough very few scientists believed that the Face was an alien artifact. A photography of Cydonia became a prioprity NASA.So Michael Malin and his MOC team snapped a picture ten times sharper than the original Viking photos. So when thousands of anxious web surfers were waiting when the first appeared on a JPL web site, revealing a natural land form. Many were disappointed by this finding.\n\nSo as you can see the Face was really just a Martian mesa. That caused a huge outbursts that shouldn't have that big of a deal. Which wasn't that big deal.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "A window of oppertunity has opened to society in which we have access to nearly driverless cars. However, is that really the best option? Driverless cars would be an unwise replacment of current cars due to the over complicated machinery,\n\nthe unsafe ways, and the problems with insurance and laws if accidens in driverless cars were to occur.\n\nThe technology of a driverless car would be too complicated. Currently, the cars which are mostly driverless, still require human attention. In any situation, the car must have a way of grabbing the attention of the person in the driver's seat.\n\n\"GM has developed the driver's seats that vibrate when the vehivle is in danger of backing into an object. The Google car simply announces when the driver should be prepared to take over. Other options under consideration are flashing lights on the windshield and other heads-up displays.\" This necessitates the driver paying full attention to the road at all times to be able to take control. If the driver wasn't paying attention, then a crash could occur from a frightened driver overreacting to the signal which the car had put off to warn the driver.\n\nTechnology never has been, nor ever will be perfect. As of now, Google cars \"have driver more than half a million miles without a crash, but so far, Google cars aren't truly driverless; they still alert the driver...\" If a driverless car were to malfunction, without a human to take over, it would cause mass chaos and accidents. Even if a human driver was there to gain control, there is no gaurentee that they would be able to make the correct adjustments and do so timley fashion.\n\nInsurance and laws are already extreamly complicated. If driverless cars were added into the current confusion, the system would be so over bearing.\n\n\"Presently, traffic laws are written with the assumption that the only safe car has a human driver in control at all times. As a result, in most states it is illegal even to test computer-driven cars.\" In order for laws to even allow the driverless cars, they would have to be changed. Additionally, when there is an accident in a driverless car, \"who is at fault- the driver or the manufacturer\"? The insurance battles alone for compensation would be so numerous that the court would be over-flowing.\n\nMany people believe that driverless cars would be safer. \"Most driving laws focus on keeping drivers, passengers, and pedestrians safe, and lawmakers know that saftey is best achieved with alert drivers.\" Computers can not remain alert, therefore they are not safe enough to be driving on the roads. While it is important for cars to advance, some things, such as driving, need to be left in the hands of humans to operate.\n\nIt would be irrational to use driverless cars in society. Due to their complicated machinery, unsafe ways, and insurance and law discrepencies, it would be best if computer-operated cars were not used. When it comes to the saftey of anyone and everyone near roads, society needs to place the care into the hands of alert human drivers. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear Senator of Florida,\n\nI think changing the election by popular vote for the President of the United States would be a better and and more fair way of voting. The Electoral College may work and all but even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong.\n\n\"Under the electoral college system, voters vote not for the President, but for a state of electors, who in turn elect the President.\" Voting gives people rights and freedom that not everybody has. If a voter wanted to vote for a President their vote should go towards the President, not the electors of the state, in all fairness. According to Plumer many people agree with the idea of changing the voting system by stating, \"...over 60 percent of voters would prefer a direct election to the kind we have now.\" In Plumer's article he says, 'The single best argument against the electoral college is what we might call the disaster factor. The American people should consider themselves lucky that the 2000 fiasco was the biggest election crisis in a century; the system allows for much worse.\" By putting this statement in his article he is trying to say that the system we have now could all go up in flames if the right thing happened to get rid of the Electoral College, so Americans should watch out. The Electoral College is unfair due to the winner-take-all system. In this system candidates for the presidency don't go to smaller states because they know they won't win with those states. They stick to the big states with more electoral votes or with the \"swing\" states. That's what I call selfish.\n\nI understand that \"each party selects a slate of electors trusted to vote for the party's nominee..[however,] it is entirely possible that the winner of the electoral vote will not win the national popular vote.\" If the next President were to win the electoral vote but not the popular vote that is like saying that only the Electoral College voted and not the real voters, the people.\n\nAll in all \"It's official: The Electoral College is unfair, outdated, and irrational.\" I would greatly appreciate if you read this over and thought about the topic I have addressed to you. Thank you for your consideration.\n\nSincerely,\n\nPROPER_NAME\n\n(a concerned citizen) ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Facial Action Coding System is a new technology that identifies the emotions of humans using a computer. The Facial Action Coding Sysytem has many possible uses one being in the classroom. The Facial Action Coding System would help teachers know when a lesson is becoming to boring, confusing, and could read other emotions of studenrts. The Facial Action Coding System should be used in classrooms in order to help teachers make their class more engaging, know when students aren't following whats going on, and to read the other emotions of students.\n\nThe Facial Action Coding Sytem could be a valuable tool for teachers in order to know when their class is becoming boring. The software would let the teacher know when their students were losing interest,\"'A classroom computer could reconize when a student is becoming confused or bored\" (D'Alto). The software's ability to tell when students are bored would enable the teacher to know they need to be more engaging or need to modify their lesson in order to draw the attention of their students. The software would tell teacher which of their classes were engaging and which ones were not, and then teachers could share this information with their colleagues to spread ideas of effective teaching strategies. The software would be beneficial to students aswell because if their teacher was more engaging, they would pay better attention and learn more.\n\nAnother valuable use for the Facial Action Coding System is it's ability to tell the teacher when their students are confused. The software would tell teachers when their students don't understand what is going on \"A classroom computer could reconize when a student is becoming confused\" (D'Alto). The software's ability to tell teachers when their students are confused would let them know when they need to slow down, explain more, and ask for questions. The ability to reconize when a student is confused would let the teacher know what parts of their lesson make the most sense and what parts they need to expand more on. This could also provide valuable data as to what topics and classes are hardest for students to understand. The ability to reconize when students are confused would also be beneficial to the students themselves. Many students are timid to ask questions in class and if a teacher was able to reconize they were confused and explained the subject more the student would better understand the topic.\n\nAnother beneficial use the Facial Action Coding system could have is the ability to read other various emotions of students. The system could also identify the other feelings students are having, \"Eckman has classified six basic emotions-happiness, suprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness\" (D'Alto). If a teacher can tell a lesson is causing suprise or happiness in their students they will know they are doing a good job and should continue on engaging with the students. If the teacher reconizes a particular student is feeling serious sadness or anger they will know to maybe leave that student alone for the day or possibly do a little thing for them or the whole class that would brighten their day a little bit.\n\nEven though the Facial Action System could possibly be expensive and a long way from implementation in schools it still has major benefits for both students and teachers. The software could make school a much better experience for students. The software should be implemented in schools because of the benefits it has to the overall teaching and learning experience of students and teachers. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "What has the auther been writing about and how has he been supporting his ideas? Will he's been writing about the challenges about venus. He's been writing about what Earth and Venus have in common, and some facts about Venus.\n\nAccording to the text the auther said \"often referred to as Earth's \"twin\" Venus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of dentsity and size, and occasionally the cloesest in distance too\"\n\nwhich is a detail that he gaved about Venus and Earth that they have in common, and according to the text the Auther said \" Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various from of live, just like Earth\"\n\nFacts the auther put about venus. The facts he put were very intersting to learn about, according to the text it said \"The national Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has one particular compelling idea for humans to study Venus\" which is really crazy because it also said that \"Venus is also the second closes to the sun\" Which is vey denagerous because it's very hot and they wouldn't be able to hand the differnces of her and Venus.\n\nThis is something about what the author stated in the text and what people had studied about Venus and what they thought about it and maybe what the're going to do in the future about sending poeple over there. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Seagoing Cowboys program has allowed me to go and to experience many adventures. I joined because of a friend, who invited me to go to Europe, so let me be your friend and tell you why you should join.\n\nIn 1945, I joined and helped \"countries recover their food supplies, animals, and more.\" Peggy Reif Miller, so we were hired to care for the animals that were shiped overseas. If you join you will be able to help others in need just like I did.\n\nOn August 14, 1945 we got onto a boat and headed to Greece. On the trip there\n\nright before we arrived I turned of age, so \"I could be drafted into military service,\" Peggy Reif Miller, but they said to keep doing what I was doing for my service. This just shows how much being in the Seagoing Cowboys program helps countries. Now the Seagoing Cowboys program is work, but it can also be fun. In the empty places that were for the animals we, the other cowboys and I, would play many different games. All the games we played were to mostly help pass the time.\n\nI also had a lot of time to see the places we went. I loved seeing\n\nEurope and China. Please, join the Seagoing Cowboys program, so you can help others just like I did. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Well, I do know that Venus is the second planet from the Sun, and that its a very challenging place to examine. I thought that Venus was one of the warmest/coldest planets in the galaxy, but it just so happens that its neither.\n\nI know that Neptune is the most freezing planet. It's the type of planet that people don't want to examine or not even explore. Even though,Venus is really simple to see from the distant but safe vantage point of Earth for the ones that like to stargaze.\n\nThe article mainly talks about on how others would see the planet \"Venus,\" I see the \"Evening Star \" as a the brighest of the planets of the whole entire galaxy along with the Sun(Itself).\n\nTo me, I also thought that the Sun was just another type of planet,but it wasn't. Turns out the Sun was the \"Biggest Star of the Galaxy.\"\n\nLet's not forget that Venus is often referred to as the Earth's \"twin.\"\n\nBecause Venus is after all the closest to the Planet Earth. The author would probably describe as the 2nd planet on the right, but I would describe/define it as the planet with the brightest points of light in the night sky, making it very simple for the stargazers.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Throughout the essay \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus,\" the author does a good job of suporting the claim that studying Venus is worth while. The author provides examples and counters them with ways to overcome said obstacles, and uses specific examples on how NASA plans to study and explore Venus.\n\nVenus has many different aspects and characteristics from Earth, such as the temperature of over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure that is 90 times greater than the pressure on Earth. Geological and weather challenges include lightning strikes, erupting volcanoes, and powerful earthquakes. The author mentions all of the issues regarding visiting Venus in the second and third paragraph. Although the author mentions the challenges, he/she is doing that to completely inform the reader by giving all the details and then finding ways to counter those obstacles. The author brings up the question of \"If our sister planet is so inhospitable, why are scientists even discussing further visits to its surface?\" in the beginning of paragraph 4. This shows how the author brings up an argument against the initial claim, and then proving that argument wrong to make the claim more valid. Next, in the fifth paragraph, the author uses evidence from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to provide ways to escape the hostile conditions of Venus. For example, one idea is to allow scientists to float above the fray in a blimp like vehicle. Again in the second paragraph, the author again mentions another plan by NASA to study Venus. This plan is to use simplified electronics made of silicon carbide because they could survive Venus's surface for a limited amount of time. By using specific evidence and research already done by NASA, the claim that \"Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents,\" is being proven well. Lastly, in the final paragraph, the author does an excellent job of summarizing the scientific gains that would come from exploring Venus. The last line states, \"Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation.\" which is a fantastic summary of the article and shows how well the author presented and supported his claim.\n\nIn conclusion, the author uses excellent writing skills to support and validate the initial claim, and does it very well. The author thoroughly analyzes each danger and possible solution, and also states the positive effects of traveling to Venus. By using specific evidence and research from NASA, and countering all of the dangers with possible solutions, the author supports the claim brilliantly.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The idea of Venus being worth of pursuit, depsite its dangers, isn't completely outrageous. The author of this passage dives into this idea, stating a reason as to why Venus exploration should happen, and also stating reasons that it currently isn't possible. Though the author does touch on the ideas of why we should explore this planet, they do not give enough reason to support the claim, or at least enough reason and ideas to keep the idea circulating within the brain of all of the readers.\n\nThe author seems to use at least two of their paragraphs to give why we should travel to Venus, in a sense that we were able to do so. In Paragraph 3 they describe the conditions of the planet, adding that Venus has volcanoes, earthquakes, and lightning strikes just as Earth does. This is just the start of the author's biggest and only claim, which fully arrives in Paragraph 4. The author does so by adding more physcial features of Venus and almost putting them side by side to Earth's. \"Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life...\", and adding that \"...Venus still has some features that are analogous to those on Earth.\" Later on, they also state that Venus has recognizable features, such as valleys, mountains, and craters. The author wrote only about how scientists would learn the history of Venus, and gave no reasoning beyond this.\n\nThough displaying a solid claim, the author gives no further explaination to their only reasoning, and goes straight into talking about the difficulty of traveling to the planet. There are multiple things the author could have slipped into the passage, like the abundance of information that scientists would learn, opening further travel, and the creation of new technology. Scientists and man alike would obtain much needed information from exploring Venus. Not only would going to this planet tell us its history, just as the author said, but it would push us closer to the exploration of planets that sit beyond this.\n\nThe author described a trip to Venus as being one that would be no fun for humans, but if able to create technology to keep our explorers safe, there would be smaller and fewer limits on the places our explorers and scientists could go after. By picking such a harsh planet to start one of many trips, the work and energy put into a way to reach the planet would pay off more than the world seems to understand. Though the technology used to get to Venus would have to be updated depending on the length of travel and the conditions of travel,--snowy and colder climates or hot, tretorous terrain like Venus--it is quite possible to get more out of Venus than what is displayed.\n\nReaders do receive great information from this passage, but the author could have been equipt to know more reasons as to why studying Venus would be a great thing for scientists. They did give the wonderous and plentyful reasons as to why it will be harsh to reach and remain on the planet, however. Despite this all, Venus is a planet to reconcile with, even if it means waiting the months or years it takes to make just the technology compatable enough to work with its body. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "When cars were first introduced into society it was the most awestruck phenomenon to occur. There was nothing better than the sight of a person's first car and the feeling of independence that came with it. But now that technology has shorten distances between countries and has made telecommuncation so much more accessible. People should engage in limiting their car usage becuase it betters personal health, improves the enivronment, and leads to economic prosperity while still gaining all the benefits that come from using a car.\n\nWhen the usage of cars is limited it often leads to better health benefits. This is true becuase when people are restricted on their driving it forces them to resort to healthier, more proactive altertnatives. For example, instead of driving somewhere people are now having to get out and walk or ride a bike. This leads to regular exercise without having to think about it and decreases overall stress levels. In the article \"In German Suburb, Life Goes on Without Cars\" Heidrum Walter, a media trainer and mother of two explained, \"When I had a car I was always tense, I'm much happier this way\". Heidrum, a citizen of the Vauban community in which everyone has given up their cars, describes how the non-usage of cars has bettered her life and in turn has actually made her a happier person. In addition, when a high usage of cars is present it creates brutual smog that can perpetuate health issues. In the aricle \"Paris bans driving due to smog\" Robert Duffer states how congestion lead to smog in Beijing in which he states \"Beijing, China is known as one of the most polluted cities in the world\". The impact of this is that when people are more active and choose not to exasterbate their driving usage, it will lead to global decreases in smog and in fat related illnesses such as obesity, high blood plessure, diabetes, and other various things that have plagued the nation and taken the lives of so many people.\n\nLimiting Motor Vehicles usage reduces the amount of carbon emissions and pollution in the air. Cars exert so much greenhouse gas emissions that degrades the air in the environment. In the article \"In German Suburb, Life goes on Without Cars\" Elisabeth Rosenthal gives the analogy that, \"...an increasing number of private cars owned by the burgeoning middles class are choking cities\". Elisabeth Rosenthal further quantifies the extent to which cars have increasing become the culprit of pollution, \"Passenger cars are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in Europe and up to 50 percent in some car-intensive areas in the United States\". The impact of this is that when cars are used less often it betters the environment which is what mankind relies on for survival.\n\nAn increase in a healthy workforce and better environmental communities leads to greater economic prosperity. When people choose to drive less it often creates a riple effect. This is true because a healthier workforce is present it leads to more productivity. In addition, a more prosperous environment and less pollution exerted decreases operational costs. As a result Andrew Selsky in his article \"Car-free day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota\" explains the various economic effects that less car usage has made, \"Parks and sports centers have bloomed throughout the city.....and new restaurants and upscale shopping distrcits have cropped up\". The impact of this is that with more economic leverage communities are more equipped to invest and strengthen other areas such as education and job creation.\n\nIn conclusion, people should limit their driving and/or car usage because it provides three benefits. First, when people have to resort to proactive alternatives it improves their person health and decreases stress levels. Second, not using cars eliminates all the environmental harms that come from a car such as greenhouse gas emissions. And lastly, when people are more active and the enivronment is no longer depleted, communities experience greater economic longevity. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The use of the Facial Action Coding System in classrooms would be like taking one step forward and then two steps back. The implication of such technology would not only be time consuming, but it would also be costly compared to the microscopic benefit it could provide to education. Incorporating a Facial Action Coding System would most certanly leave a negative impact on school systems.\n\nTo set the basis of reasoning as to why incorporating this technology would decrease productivity in classrooms, it is important to understand how microscopic the potential benefit is. If an instructor were to implement the use of a Facial Action Coding System into his or her classroom, the only information the instructor will recieve regards emotions of the students. If the instructor has any experience in the field of education, they should already be able to know the difference between the students that wish they were somewhere else, the students that are engaged in the lesson, and the students that are zoning out. These three types of students are all the instructor needs to be able to recognize to carry out his or her job efficiently, being able to recognize that a particular person is depressed or happy is necessary for a psychologist, not a teacher.\n\nAnother reason the implementation of a Facial Action Coding System in classrooms is very unwise pretains to the heavy costs. The seventh paragraph of the article states,\"Your home PC can't handle the complex algorithms used to decode Mona Lisa's smile.\" Most people probably know by now that a PC is not cheap by any stretch of the word. If a Facial Action Coding System feautures algorithms so complex that not even a home PC that could cost thousands of dollars is able to handle, then there is no doubt that the system will be very costly for little to negative acceleration in classroom productivity.\n\nAnybody that has been raised in an era that feautures a lot of technological implications into a classroom would understand that technological difficulties occur rather frequently. Even if a school somehow managed to fund the immersion of a Facial Action Coding System into classrooms, there are bound to be technical difficulties if the system is as complex as the article has says it is. When those difficulties occur it is not likely that a school has many staff in it that can comprehend the inner workings of the malfunctioning system. This means that when the technical difficulties occur it would either be a lost cause or a waste of time trying to deal with it. Even if by some miracle the system never fails, the system is not going to provide much benefit at all despite being excrutiatingly pricey.\n\nAlthough the creation of a Facial Action Coding System is nothing short of impressive, a classroom is most definatley not the place to utilize it. If people want it to be utilized to benefit people, implementing it into a criminal interrogation room would be much more beneficial. For all of the previously stated reasons, it is clear that incorporating a Facial Action Coding System into classrooms is not a wise decision.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I believe that driverless cars are a negative factor. As the author stated, having driverless cars will be in need of many new laws to compinsate for these new cars. These laws would cause more hassle for the people to have new laws put on these cars. These laws may cause problems for people who do not have these cars.\n\nSecondly, I believe that these new types of cars will need to have a new type of insurance. This would prove to be troublesome for insurance compines and for the people. The prices for this insurance would be expensive and hard to afford.\n\nFinally, the safety of people would be at a risk with these cars. If one of these new cars have a maunifunction in it's technology, it could drive off the road, hit another tdriver, or even kill someone because of it. The manufatures could make a mistake in the programing and it would be a deadly killing machine on the road.\n\nThe best safety on the road is cause form aware drivers not aware technology. A perosn could make a better prediction on to where to stop then any driverless cars. Driverless cars are a negative impact on the road and to people. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I support \" The Facial Coding System\"\n\nbecause, it would help with alot of different things going on in school. Like for example it could tell what kind of mood the student is in so the teacher could know how to approch them wihtout the student \" going off.\" This would even help with knowing if the student gets the lesson the teacher is teaching by thier facial expressions.\n\nLike i said it helps with alot of differnt things, the author says, \" hold on, can we acually \"calculate\" emotions.\" yes we can, its a \"smart computer\" & its like a person. I say its like a person because, say you see your friend and he/she has a frown on her/his face. You auctmactly know theres something wrong because he/shes frowning & thats also what the computer is bacislly doing.\n\nLike the author said \" whoever thought that making faces could reveal so much about the science of emotions.\" Faces dont lie and your feelings cant hide. I say that this invention would be great also because of children that get abused at home, & when they come to school they're getting bullied here too. So this is why i support \" The Facial Action Coding.\"", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Venus is referred to as Earth's twin because it is one of the planets that closely resembles planet Earth in size and density. However, it is a very dangerous planet to explore due to it's erupting volcanoes, toxic atmosphere, and massive earthquakes. The author states that despite it's challeniging obstacles, it is worth exploring Venus because the knowledge to be learned can and will be critical to understanding it.\n\nIn the passage, \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus,\" the author states the importance of studying Venus. As stated by the author, \"Furthermeore, recall that Venus can sometimes be our nearest option for a planetary visit, a crucial consideration...\" The author expresses the possibilty of having to visit Venus one day, and how it can be a crucial consideration. He says that Venus can be our nearest option \"due to the long time frames of space travel.\"\n\nThe author goes on to elaborate on innovation that many researchers are working on in order to make our technology more durable and effective in the harsh conditions of Venus. On the other hand, NASA is going on a different path towards exploration on Venus. They are testing the duration of objects in those conditions. \"some simplified electronics made of silicon carbride have been tested ina\n\nchamber simulating the chaos of Venus's surface and have lasted three weeks in such conditions.\" The author introduces this paragraph to give the reader an idea of how important Venus's exploration is to NASA and similar departments.\n\nVenus is a planet very similar to Earth, as it's nickname would state. However, there are so many challenges encountered towards the exploration. Most conditions in Venus are unhabitable, and may stay that way unless researchers find a way to sustain that much chaos and make great progress. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think we should keep the electoral college be cause people can vote on electors and not the actual presedent they want to win for the vote because people think he or she may or may not be the best person to be for that job we should keep the electoral college for reasons like not haveing to pick or choose for the better person. To be if the both want kinda the same thing,it would help the people not the presedent it only gets them votes and votes are nouthing to me or others.\n\n2. second i think we should keep it beacuse you can tell who voted and not the people that voted because you get a sticker that said i voted so that puts an place that you have voted or not and if u dont u have some time to do it or there will be anourther person who takes and votes in ur place and u wont be able to vote .3. because the ballet things are full and the time is up for them to vote ,so they have to wait till the next time to vote is ansd that will be the next year so useing the electoral collage will allow u to be able to vote on time and mnot miss be ing able to vote becaus evoting is im portant to the county or the contonet to be counted on not only you but others around so u can have a choice of what you want to have as a presedent of the united states 4. third haveingf the electoral college will help tho ones who cant get out to vote and be able to do it just about any wear your at and that will be help full to me and othere because im nort allowed to vote yet so it comes in handy in many ways to us and other people to ther united states . ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Why would we need technology to tell us someones emotions when we know ourselves? No, I don't think that this is valuable because it is basically a machine that does an action that we can do ourselves. It also may not even be as acurate as scientist beleive. Another reason why I beleive that this invention isn't valuable is because I just find it really scary how exact the numbers are that the machine gives even if the numbers aren't correct and how much of interaction is happening between the face and the software.\n\nThe first reason that I beleive that this software isn't valuable is because we don't need a machine to do the job of reading expressions for us when we can do it just fine by ourselves. I know this because in the article they state,\" In fact, we humans perform this same impressive \"calculation\" everyday.\" This shows that we can indeed read emotions of people all by ourselves. I also know this because the text states,\" For instance, you can probably tell how a friend is feeling simply by the look on her face.\" This statement is completely true, I know that I can tell when people are upset even if they aren't my friends or someone that I know. Finally, I know this because the text states,\" Of course, most of us would have trouble actually describing each facial trait that conveys happy, worried, ect.\" This is true to a point because we may not be able to know when someone is feeling worried or frustrated but we know that something is wrong. That is not a bad thing when we don't know every expression on somoenes face becasue that gives us social experiences with other people to go and ask them what's wrong.\n\nThe second reason that I beleive that this software isn't valuable is because scientists may beleive that this technology is accurate but is it really? I know this because in the text it states,\"Yet Dr. Huang observes that artists such as da Vinci studied human anatomy to help them paint facial muscles precisely enough to convey specific emotions.\" This right here shows that if the muscles of the face aren't showing enough muscle for an emotion the software might pick up a different emotion. I also know this because the text states that, \"For example, your frontalis pars lateralis muscle(above your eyes) raises your eyebrows when you're suprised; your orbiculars oris (around your mouth) tightens your lips to show anger.\" I disagree with how they are training this software to recognize facial emotion because some people don't make a happy face when they are happy or a sad face when they are sad.\n\nThe last reason that I beleive that this software isn't valuable is because it is really creepy on how exact the number can get and how much interaction there is between the computer and the face. I know this because the text states,\"She's 83 percent happy, 9 percent disgusted, 6 percent fearful, and 2 percent angry.\" Wow, to me that is scary. I would never want this software to read my facial expressions. I also know this because the text states, \" Dr. Huang and his colleague are experts at developing better ways for humans and computers to communicate.\" Why would people want computers to take over little everyday things that we do? This is creepy how much computers have weasled their way into our everyday lives so easily.\n\nIn conclusion, I beleive that this software isn't valuable because why would we use a machine to do something that we can do by ourselves? Also because the information being received from the software may not even be accurate. Finally, because the software is just really creepy and scary to think about how much human and machine interaction happens daily and how much much we rely on them. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "What would you do if you saw what NASA saw on Mars in 1976? In 1976,\n\nNASAs Viking 1 spacecraft was circling Mars, snapping photos of a possible landing site for its sister ship Viking 2, when it spotted the shadowy likeness of a human face. Eventully, scientists figured out that it was possibly just another Martian mesa.\n\nA few days later NASA revealed the image for everyone to see. The caption said a huge rock formation . . . which resembles a human head . . . formed by shadows giving the illusion of eyes, nose, and mouth. This said that the formation wasn't a human head but just a oddly shaped land form.\n\nHowever, some people think that this could be an actule human life form on Mars, But, When Mars Global Surveyor flew over Cydonia for the first time, they saw that it was just a natural land form.\n\nThe Face on Mars formed to be a natural land form, so scientists told the people that there was no alien life form and that they were safe from harm. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "He is very smart. He found that Venus is one of the brightest points of light in the sky. He also found out that Venus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of density and size. And sometimes the closest in distance to.\n\nVenus has a thick atmosphere of amlost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets covering it. There are even more dangers in Venus like the clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in it's atmosphere. The second biggest danger is that it's average temperatures is over eight hundred degress Fahrenheit. That average temperature on Venus is way to hot for anyone to survive. The biggest danger is that the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet. And on Venus there is signs of additional impediments like erupting vlcanoes and powerful earthquakes.\n\nThe biggest reason way I like it is because Venus might of been the most earth-like planet in our solar system. So that why i think they should try to build a blimp-like vehicle. They are trying to make a way so that humans can go to Venus and survive. Or get a machine that's strong, able to handle the heat, take pictures, and even evidence.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The use of technology that can read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is valuable. The technolgy could be used to help engage students in certain lessons. This could also help students to undertand certain lessons where they might be confused. The technology could be good for schools if they're put into classes.\n\nThe technology seems to be very reliable according to the article.The Facial Action Coding Sytstem was developed by Prof. Thomas Haung and Prof. Nicu Shebe. Paragraph 3 states that the computer constructs a 3-D model of a face and that the 44 major muscles in the model must move like human muscles. It also states that the software uses six basic emotions that the computer can associate with characteristic movements of facial muscles.\n\nThe software also use video imagery to track facial movements in a real face or painted ones. Paragraph 4 states that each expression is compared against a neutral face. By weighting different units the software can indentify mixed emotions. In paragraph 5, it states that the software can store anatomical information as code.\n\nThe software would also be able to be applied to day to day life. In paragraph 6 they talk about how the software can be used to show personal preference when using a computer. It would be able to read your expression when an ad shows up and based on your expression, it determine if you get a similar ad or a different one. It also states similar technology can be used to make video animated faces more expressive for things like video games or video surgery.\n\nThis evidence shows that Facial Action Coding Systems could be good in shcools. The software would be able to recognize bored expressions and can male the lesson more appealing. It would also be able to recognize confused expressions and the software would make the lesson easier to understand. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Cars are changing now more than ever before. Some of the changes that cars are going through are good while some of them aren't so good. We need cars to get places. In the first paragraph it says \"He envisions a future with a public transportation system where fleetd of driverless cars form a public-transport taxi system.\" Not everyone is comfortable with that and not all people want a public transportation stayem to use. What if they like being alone and away from all the people? Will there still be cars that aren't driverless? Or will the population of cars that need to be driven not exist anymore?\n\nGoing against this is better thasn being for it. Most people spent a lot of time and money getting there license and taking classes to learn how to drive and then that all just gets taken away by driverless cars or transportation syatems. It's not the best idea to do that. What if the driverless items don't get used? It would cost lots of money and people would lose there jobs because of this like taxi drivers, bus drivers, and people that teach drivers ed; but it's good that cars do have the \"Traffic Jam Assistant\" or other things in their car that help prevent accidents and other things of that sort. We need things like the Traffic Jam Assistant because it helps people out for example in paragraph seven it says that The car can handle driving functions at speeds up to 25 mph, but special touch sensors make sure the driver keeps hold of the wheel.\" That means that it could save a persons life. By just having a sensor in your car can help save your life that's the kind of thing that we need in cars today.\n\nSo instead of having driverless cars why don't we put systems like the Traffic Jam Assistant in cars to help people out. It;s really pointless to go out of your way and spend so much money to create something that we don't even know will work yet last. So what if the power went out in the city and then the \"back up\" generator kicked in then it got shut down by the big storm. What would happen to the people that have to go get their kids of are already out doing things and need to get home to see if their families are okay. What do you do then if there are no regular cars and the power doesnt work nothing does? That's why we don't need driverless cars and or transpotation systems.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "While driverless cars seem to be a concept that existed solely in cartoons and books, many may be surprised by how close man is to making this fantasy a reality. While these cars express a great amount of potential, they also present considerable drawbacks. The development of semi autonoumous vehicles should be discontinued becasue of their all neccessity for impractical supplies whiile maintaining dependence on human skills.\n\nAlthough having a more innovative public-transport system seems enticing, their need for an abundance of supplies is impractical in the long term situation of the world. According to the conduction of General Motors's experiment in the late 1950s, having a driverless car would require a track that was \"embedded with an electrical cable..\" which would also entail \"massive upgrades to existing roads\". Engineers at Berkeley conducted a similar experiment using \"magnets with alternating polarity\" to achieve the same results. The application of these innovations to modern roads would, in fact, benefit today's transportation system, but can the economy undertake this massive change? Other ideas to promote the development of driverless cars \"needed a whole lot of sensors\", which also has the potentional to put a large dent into the economy. Google's modified version of a Toyota Prius resulted in a plethora of additions of technological devices that would enhance the driverless experience. Due to the large input necessary to create a car that would \"mimic the skill of a human\", is it all worth it? While these are phenomenal ideas to advance modern vehicles to become semi autonomous, the renovations required alongside the implementation of these concepts are \"too expensive to be practical\".\n\nWhile the concept of a \"driverless vehicle\" may hold much promise to create an innovative experience, they have a heavy dependence on the human skill itself. BMW had built in touch sensors that ensure that the \"driver keeps hold of the wheel\". If a driver is consistently having to monitor the car, the term driverless vehicles is deemed invalid. These semi autonomous vehicles also notify the driver when the road \"requires human skills\", which completely defeats the purpose of having a driverless car. Driving into car crashes makes the driverless car more of a threat to humans that an innovation. In short, the driver still needs to watch the road, even if the car does watch the driver.\n\nWhile the concept of a driverless car seems to hold potential, the amount of effort necessary to put into the process deems it ineffient. Because of its human dependence and anti-innovative requirements, the development of driverless cars should be discontinued. After all, what is the point of having a driverless car you there needs to be a driver? ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Technology that can read the emotional expression of students in a classroom is very valuable because if we use this type of technology in classrooms now a days, we can see how students are feeling and see their emotions like happiness, surpised, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness. I think yes, this can help us in many different ways.\n\nOne of the reasons why we should have this type of technology in classrooms is to read every students expressions to see how their feeling today at school. If the student is feeling sad or depressed and the technoogy picks that up, teachers can do something about it to maybe help the student in someway. This peice of new technology can help prevent conflicts or in some bad situations where a student is feeling anger or distress. In paragraph 6, it states that \" a classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored\". This can help teacher teach better in class and help the student understand better if they feel them type of emotions.\n\nThe Facial Action Systems technology can be studied by students in the claasrooms, they can study on themselfs to see how there feeling today. They can see if their friends are happy or sad, that can just improve our social skills by trying to figure out why their friends or classmates are feeling these types of emotions. This can make us better people by comunication with one another. This software should be used in classrooms, it will make our teachers teach better in their lessons, its will make students better in the classrooms because the teacher will know what is wrong weather your confused on the lesson the teachers will know and they will help the students become better each day with this technology.\n\nI think it will be a good idea to have this software in the classroom because not only will the students, teachers, and other members in the school will know what your feeling, your own family members can see also how you are feeling today in the classroom as well. This can help improve the comunication with their loved ones at home too. They can seek help if they really need it if parents see what the problem is weather if your child is feeling sad or just confussed, teachers can make sure parents will be notifed to see what is the problem in their child. Thanks to this technology, it will make better students.\n\nThe facial Acton Coding System is just would be a great thing to use in a classroom, it will make students better students by just reading their facial expression every day when their at school. It will improve schools just by many different ways with this facial technology. Students and teachers will learn alot from this and finding out that by just making faces could reval so much about the science of emotions behind this fine technology software. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" is about the idea that venus is worth studying despite the dangers on the planet. venus is the seconed planet from the son making it close to earth. Acording to the author venus was often referred to as earth twins acording to the text it states \"Venus is the closest planet to earth in terms of density and size\". The author also states that venus has proved to be very challenging place to examine up close.\n\nFor many reason like \"A thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxid\". Even more challenging reasons is clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in venus atmosphere and temperatures over 800 degrees fahrengeit. Are just some of the reasons that it would be hard to explor venus. The author mainly just states the reasons its hard to vistit venus and the author really doesnt state why it would be worthy to go and study venus. Except for samples of rocks and gases.\n\nInconclusion it wouldnt be that worthy to visit venus its just to risky and a waste of time instead we could study other planets like mars. Which we already know alot about.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In \"The Challenge of Eploring Venus,\" the author supports the idea that Venus is a worthy planet for exploration. Even though it is very dangerous to explore he/she explains how Venus might be one of the planets humans will want to vist because it could hold secrets to our planets birth and death. Then they tell in full detail how we could possibly vist Venus safely. These few key details help the author build and support the suggested idea that we should vist Venus.\n\nFirst we must know that going to Venus will not be easy for humans to do. In the text the author writes,\"A thick Atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets Venus. Even more challenging are the clouds of highy corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere. On the planet's surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet.\" This further proves that Venus is going to be a serious challenge for man kind to vist because of the crazy condtions humans will have to face.\n\nIn order to vist venus safely we need to be able to plan a way to survive Venus's extreme conditions. In the text the author provides examples of how humans will do so such as,\"The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has one particularly compelling idea for sending humans to study Venus. NASA's possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of Venus would allow scientists to float above the fray. Imagine a blimp-like vehicle hovering 30 or so miles above roiling Venusian landscape. Just as our Jet airplains travel at a higher altitude to fly over many storms, a vehicle hovering over Venus would avoid the unfriendly ground conditions by staying out of their way.\" This futher proves that traveling to Venus in the furture is possible. Also that scientists are coming up with ways on how we can safely get to Venus's surface.\n\nMost importantly Venus could help us understnad more about space. In the text the author writes,\"If our sister planet is so inhospitable, why are scientists even discussing further vists to its surface? Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system.\" This point further proves that Venus is a place humans should want to explore because it could hold answers for Earths begginings and how it might end. Also Venus could hold secrets about our universes beggining and end.\n\nIn concusion the author proves that Venus should be further investigated because even though it faces many dangers it is possible to vist. Also visting Venus could give humans valuble information on our planets life as well as unlock keys to how our universe could have begun and is going to end. The author does more than an perfect job at telling why humans should go to Venus. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The challenge of exploring Venus showed a great amount of evidence to support both opinions, supportive of the idea or not. As we lnow venus is 170 degrees on the surface but ships can take it. Then theres the fact that no spacecrafts sent by humans has ever lasted more than a few hours on the surface of venus.\n\nthere is a thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets on venus, and even more challenging are the clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in venus's atmospher.\n\nVenus distance wise is a time consuming yet possible feet. Venus and mars are the closest neighboring plants to us and Venus more than mars shows there could have been life long ago on this planet. Venus consists of valleys, mountian ranges, craters , and many believe oceans once inhabited this planet. Talks of NASA doing a human ran investigation thirty miles aboves venus to do reaserch.\n\nNASA belives that Venus has not easy condistions but survivable for humans. There has been talks of even sending people down there to do research in the future and that could go bad knowing the knowledge you have on this planet. the challenges would be very intimidating and unpredictable.\n\nIn the end these talks on further exploring Venus is very intresting and inthink is should be done at the right place and the right time. Us as humans are curious creatures and should have all the knowledge we can gather on these forigne planets before human exploration. A lot of questions un answered and a lot to answer.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Who wouldnt want to have a car? Thats a reason we get from desination A to destination B. Vauban, Germany they are gicing up their cars, like why would you give a object that gets you places faster than walking. Thats not smart. People that had cars have to give their car away in order to live in Germany. Vauban's streets are completely \" car-free\". 70 percent of Vauban's families do not have cars. Which mean the kids would have to walk everywhere they go, also the parents when you have jobs..what if you dont get to work on time?\n\nParis enforced a partical driving ban to clear the airr of the global ci ty. If they didnt leave their cars at home they would have been fined for $31.\n\nCongestion was down 60 percent in the capital of France, after five-years of intensifying smog. China is known as one of the most polluted cities in the world . But paris typically has more smog than other European capitals.. Last week paris had 147 micrograms of particulate matter (PM) per cubic meter .\n\nPresident Obama's ambitious goals to curb the United States' greenhouse gasemissions, unveiled last week will get a fortuitous assist from an incipient shift in American behavior.\n\nWith all these changes, people who stopped car commuting asa result of the recession may find less reasons to resume the habit ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author's claim of whether or not we should be studying Venus is that we shoud be studying it more closely. The author feels strongly that, \"Striving to meet the challenge presented by Venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors\" (Paragraph 8). The author believes gong to Venus will help us solve even more daunting feats after this one and offers solutions from NASA, specific techniques and equipment to use, and inspiration of Venus being Earth's \"twin\".\n\nBy using NASA, a credible source for the topic, the author seems to know what they are talking about, and comes across as reliable. In Paragraph 5, the author states, \"NASA's possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of Venus would allow scientists to float above the fray\". The author then descrbes an elaborate plan of how NASA would send its craft to float above the surface to where humans could still survive the harrowing conditions. Later in Paragraph 6, the author states how certain samples would not be able to take physical sample from the planet itself. The author explaining a rebuttal makes them seem unbiased and open to other options, like the one they provide in Paragraph 7.\n\nThe author knows that the conditions are unsurvivable to humans without the proper equipment, and offers different technologies and computers to use instead. Again, the author uses NASA as a credible source, and states,\"NASA is working on other approches to studying Venus... simplified electronics made of silicon carbide\" (Paragraph 7). The author continues to explain how this method is better suited to work on Venus than any other method. By offering many ideas, this gives the reader confidence to trust the author is reliable.\n\nThe third thing the author accomplished was a sense of PATHOS into the reader. On two different occasions in the article, the authors refers to Venus being Earth's \"twin\" or \"sister\". They offer how the planets are similar to make the readers more encouraged to want to visit the planet. By directly comparing our home to an amazing accomplishment, the reader feels a sense of duty to now want to visit this planet and know more about the closest thing we have to family in this vastness that is outer space. It makes readers feel less alone. By using this technique, readers become insured to read on.\n\nThe author's mix of information and feelings, created a reliable argument. The author was biased, but made impotant rebuttals to their first claim, but came back later to offer another solution. The author did an impresive job of explaining complicated topics and supported those claims with evidence from a relaible, credible source. The author made their claim easy to read and relatable, as well. The message the author was trying to convey was met that Venus is worthy pursuit despite the dangers. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The topic I will be talking about today is a opinon on driverless cars. The passage informes the reader that many companies are working on the concept, of fully driverless car's. Seems scary but if it's safer than a human-driven car, then the world could just be that much safer.\n\nMy thought on driverless cars is that if its safer, then I'm up for it. My thing is though if their is a maulfuntion or a error in the programming, and a auto-mobile accident occurs then who fault is it? Because when you buy the car you are worry free of collision's or accidents and things of thar nature. So if the programs aren't ready for taking over human funtions, and its not 100% efficent for every day situations. It needs more work but eventualy it'll take place in history as the fisrt driverless car. As cool as it seems it could be more dangerous than human driver's. If it can be pulled off then im up for it.\n\nMy thought is any manufacturers that release these cars should be 100% sure that no error is in play. Its a very good idea in my opinon.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus,\" the authoor suggests that studying Venus is a bad thing to do and is very dangerous. The author gives a few reasons on why it is dangerous.\n\nFirst, Venus is a very hot planet. People would sometimes think the hottest planet is Mercury because it is closer to the sun but it isn't the hottest. In paragraph 3 is explains that on the planet's surface, temperatures average over 800 degreea, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet. For example, diving to the deepest part of the oceans would liquefy many metals.\n\nSecond, a long time ago, Venus was probably covered with oceans and could have supported various forms of life. But today, Venus has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and craters. So maybe a long time ago it would have been nice to visit but now, it isn't. Way to hot and it is covered all in rocks and valleys.\n\nLastly, in paragraph 5 it explains that \"Hovering over Venus would avoid the unfriendly ground conditions by staying up and out of their way.\" So even if you wanted to try to go to Venus, you would die of heat. Your vehicle would not make it back.. you wouldn't either.\n\nI think the author did good at supporting his idea with many reasons. The author gave many reasons why you shouldn't try to travel to Venus. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I don't think the use of this technology would be very ethical, when you think about the things that most people would use it for, because of ads. America runs on brands, everywhere you look, brand, brand, brand. I could be sitting at home in my Ikea couch, playing on my Microsoft Xbox, while listing to music on my Alienware pc, with Spotify. People could use this technology to shovel ads into your face, and they will. I do have another thought on this though, it could be used to help people in need, people such as abuse victims. A lot of people try to hide deppresion, and this technology could be used to make the growing suicide rate in America plummet like a bag full of cylinder blocks, in the ocean. Surely this tech is flawed in many ways as it is made by humans, and we are not perfect by any means, I mean you can't always tell how someone is feeling based only on their face. This technology, can be frustrating, as well as life saving.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think that this image of this face is very neat. Although I think that the face is real, but I dont think that the aliens did it though. I think that it was just nature made. Just like how if we are outside sometimes in the woods or just out in the yard you see like a heart shape or any shape on and object. You think its really neat and all but it doesnt go through your head that a strange living person made it. I know that it is on a diferant planet, and that we are looking for life some where else, but personaly I do not think that it is made by aliens.\n\nJust because they think that there is some other life out there doesnt mean that that life made this. If there was other life out there they would have been able to see the life moving around. Like us in the city or something we have monuments and statutes and they are all in or very close to the city. We dont just build somethng and have it we out where no one will go. There all in the city. So dont you think that the aliens would be out around admireing it, and looking at it.\n\nThis is what I think. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The\" Face on Mars \",this was a therory that even scientist couldn't figure out until 2001. The space probs most liikely sent false information that made them belive that it was a face, when in reality it was just a huge rock formation. Also, in the place that this site was located they are to belive that these things are common in this area. It was the shadows of the rock formation that gave off the belief to be a human face in the rock formation.\n\nNASA states that new high resolution images and 3D altimetry from NASA's Mars Global Survey spacecraft reveal the Face on Mars for what it really is : A mesa. Also, it says that another group of people went to Mars and as soon as they could get a photo of it the the minute that they could.When they put it on the website there were already thousands of anxious web surfers waiting ,so when the image appeared they could identify it as a natural landform and there was no alien monument after all.\n\nEven though they came to a conclusion many people still had doubts about it, so they prepared to look again. They said it's not easy to target Cydonia, so Mars Global Surveyor drew\n\nin closer to the surface and luckly enough it wa not an alien monument.These facts state that there were no aliens on Mars because aliens are not real and they most likely will never be.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the generation we are living in today cars are a huge part of our everyday lives. Whether it's going to school/work, hanging with friends or anywhere really; people rely on their cars for everything and you never hear anyone talk about walking, biking and taking another way of transportation. It's whole new era with how are society is created and working but it's how we are living, and it seems to be working. Elisabeth Rosenthal, Robert Duffer, and Andrew Selsky all have the same mindset when talking about cars; while each are talking about a different reason to decrease car usage, they all have a common interest in wanting it to be implied or simply like how it is being enforced. So after reading very specific, factual, and information articles I now know the advantages of limiting car usage and that is to save time and businesses, conserve resources, and having a vast decrease in car culture.\n\nImagine yourself on a bad morning, you woke you late and you're probably rushing out the door for work, and as a fellow American I would know that there is early morning traffic no matter where you are headed. But if you didn't use a car and maybe walked or rode a bike you could easily get there faster if it was a reasonable distance. \"In a program that's set to spread to other countries, millions of Colombians hiked, biked, skated or took buses to work during a car-free day yesterday, leaving the streets fo this capital city eerily to devoid of traffic jams\" (Selsky, par 20). This goes to show that when people took other steps to get to work instead of cars that there was no traffic jams. Which means no waitng which also means getting to work at a normal time, or for some, even on time. When you think about it you know that the roads can be a really busy and hetic place to be if you time it just right, so if you take the extra measure and maybe walk home you can easily make faster time and not just that but it helps the environment. Now another advantage of not using cars is businesses start to flourish. \"Parks and sports centers also have bloomed throughout the city; uneven, pitted sidewalks have been replaced by broad, smooth sidewalks; rush- hour restrictions have dramatically cut traffic; and new restaurants and upscale shopping districts have cropped up\" (Selsky, par 28). Since many people have decided not to use their cars they walk or bike and that can lead to going to places near by which would mean they see more of their city than they did in a car. More eyes are to catch businesses and they find themselves walking into a store because they aren't rushed and/or it might just look intersting which is a huge benefit for companies.\n\nSecondly, another advantage on limiting car usage would be conserving resources. This is a very major step when it comes to the environment and things like these should be enforced for a greener Earth. \"Passenger cars are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in Europe... and up to 50 percent in some car-intensive areas in the United States\" (Rosenthal, par 5). This is damaging our Earth and the only to prevent it is to limit your car use. Because how it's happening and how it's polluting our Earth is from the cars tailpipes when it releases the exhaust. Due to this hazardly problem laws are starting to be made to limit the use. Towns and cities have tried to come up with a no-driving day to decrease the use and help the environment, and in many cases it has worked while in some, it hasn't. \"After days of near-record pollution, Paris enforced a partial driving ban to clear the air of the global city\" (Duffer, par 10). In effect to this 'experiment' it is shown that this way of thinking had changed Paris; pollution decreased and congestion in traffic was down and the smog that was being created by cars had stopped the next couple of days. It's unbelievable to know what can happen when you limit yourself.\n\nFinally, it is clear that there is a decrease in car culture. There have been recent studies that imply that more Americans aren't driving or just plain out don't want to get their licenses. \"A study last year found that driving by young people decreased 23 percent between 2001 and 2009...\" (Rosenthal, par 41). We aren't really understanding as to why this is happening. Maybe it's because they are afraid of getting a ticket, their parents haven't allowed it, they are against pollution- it's not known. But what we do know is that yes, it's saving the environment but it's hurting the car businesses. \"If the pattern presists- and many sociologists believe it will have a beneficial implications for carbon emissions and the environment, since transportation is the second largest source of America's emission, just behind power plants\" (Rosenthal, par 34). Yes, this is going to increasingly better our enivornment by not having more cars on the road to pollute, but it will for sure hurt the car industry. Not many people even have the money to go out a buy a car in this economy. And from the car businesses in ruins, some are even rebranding themselves. The change in car culture is known for much less commuting due to technology as well.\n\nLastly, a reminder of the advantages in limiting car usage are saving time and businesses, conserving resources and a decrease in car culture. So when you're on the road, start thinking about ways to stop your use of cars and see how it would benefit the environment; cause the more we drive around the worse our Earth will become. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The conspiracy about aliens has been starting to go too far. An isolated mesa was found on Mars, but when its picture was taken, it looked like a face. The conspiracy theorists have been thinking that that's the proof that there's life on Mars, but they're wrong. The picture was taken in 2001, which means it was very detailed, so it would've been obvious if there were any tombs or buildings surrounding the mesa. Also, it only looks like a face because of it shadows. The shadows actually shape it into a face. Finally, if it was actually a sign for alien life, it would've profited NASA, so there wouldn't be a point in hiding the \"truth\" that the conspiracy theorists believe. These all show that the Face is just an ordinary rock.\n\nThe last picture of the Face was taken in 2001. This was a very detailed picture, even for being taken so long ago. Each pixel in the image was equal to 1.56 meters in real life. This means that any other nearby buildings or tombs would've been seen near the rock. There weren't any buildings or any sign of actual alien life nearby, so the picture at least proved that the Face wasn't a sign from the aliens, but just a rock.\n\nThe only reason that the Face looks so much like a face is because of the shadows. Without the shadows, the Face might just look like an ordinary rock on mars. The shadows themself give the illusion of the rock having eyes, a nose, and a mouth. Those shadows are the only reason that the Face IS\n\nthe Face.\n\nWithout those shadows, the Face wouldn't be so famous. Nobody would have probably ever known or cared about it.\n\nThe conspiracy theorists and many people in general probably think that NASA is hiding the fact that aliens are real, so they're lying about the Face and just saying that it's a landform, when they think it's a sign that aliens exist. That's not true. NASA is a company that needs money like all the rest. They know that telling people that aliens were real would profit them a lot, so they wouldn't just hide the fact that the Face was an alien artifact if it was one. NASA probably wishes that they had found an ancient cililization on Mars, just for the profit.\n\nThe theorists are wrong about the Face being an ancient artifact. The latest picture of the Face is so detailed, that any ancient civilizations nearby would be visible. Also, the Face is only the Face because the rock has shadows along it that makes it look like it has eyes, a nose, and a mouth. Finally, NASA would proabably like to find an ancient civilization on Mars, just so that they could profit from finding something related to alien life. They wouldn't just hide the truth if they could gain money from it. Therefore, theorists should just realize that facts are facts, and that if NASA finds an ancient civilization on Mars, they'll tell everyone.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In paragraph 4 it says \"Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with Oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth.\n\nThe author also states that, Today, Venus still has some features hat are analogous to these on Earth. The planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys, maountains, and craters. They recall that Venus can sometimes be our nearest option for a planetary visit, but a crucial consideration given the long time frames of space travel. In paragraph 5 it informs us that NASA says, that the visit would not have easy conditions, but survuvable for humans.\n\nIn paragraph 1 the author tells us that, Venus, sometimes called the \"Evening Star,\" si one of the brightest points of light in the sky, easy even for an amateur stargazer to spot. Although, this nickname is misleading since Venus is actually a planet. The author also claims that Venus is the second planet from our sun. It has proved a very challenging place to examine more closely. Also referred to as Earth's \"twin,\" Venus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of density and size, occasionally the closest in distance too. The author also says \"Earth, Venus, Mars, our other plaetary neighbor, orbit the sun at different speeds. These differences in speed mean that sometimes we are closer to Mars and other times to Venus.\" He also states that Venus is sometimes right arounf the corner, in space terms.\n\nIn paragraph 2 the author claims \"Numerous factors contribute to Venus's reputation as a challening planet for humans to study, despite its proximity to us.\" He also states that NASA has sent numerous spacecrafts to land on this cloud- draped world. Each previous mission was unmanned, and for a good reason, since no spacecraft survived the landing for more than a few hours. Maybe this issue explains why not a single spacecraft has touched down on Venus more than three decades ago.\" But NASA is still studying how they could get a better way to study Venus.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Do you think you could live without a car? In some cities across the world people dont even use cars. Being car free is a good idea because it reduces the level of polution in the enviroment and it saves resources.\n\nTo begin with, being car free would be better off because it reduces the level of polution. For example,\"Paris typically has more smog than other European capitals\" as stated by Robert Duffer in the article \"Paris bans driving due to smog\". Paris made a driving ban that fined different drivers on certain days going by their liscence plate numbers. This law caused the smog to clear just enough for the French to uplift the ban. Another example of where being car free reduced polution is in Bogata, Columbia. Where anually they'd go a day without cars. \"Violators faaced $25 fines.\" quoted from Andrew Selsky's article, \"Car-free day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota\". Business man Calos Aruro Plaza said on that day,\"It's a good opportunity to take away stress and lower air pollution.\" Finally being car free is a good idea because it reduces the amount of pollution put into the air.\n\nIn conclusion, in order to reduce pollution and save resources more cities should think about being car-free. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I would not suguest self-driving cars. What if war ever comes and the enemy were to somehow hack the cars and kill people who are in them. Everyone would require a car upgrade and some people wont be able to afford that. Im good with a 2005 Monte Carlo. Now what they should do is bring classic cars back and start making parts for them again.\n\nIn my honest oppinion I believe 1969 was the golden years for cars. I wouldn't want a car that has a camera that watches me while I drive. Thats like too far over the line. I can understand if they made flying cars in the future that uses magnetic power or even fuel of some sort. I honestly believe that we are going to keep creating better and better technology.\n\nEventually technology is going to be smarter than humanity and it will over run the human race and make us the lowest life force. People need to think for future preferences. Driveless cars would also be a bad idea because some older people don't get technology too well and they could get seriously hurt if they don't opperate the car right. Some people wouldn't want to have a camera in a car that watches them because they may go park somewhere and want to do something private and it wouldn't be private with a camera above their head. Plus people would start to get lazy and not want to drive at all.\n\nThen we may have another obeasity problem. There are just too many concerns and unanswered questions to have self driving cars. I trust a human driver a lot more than an electrical driver any day. I wouldn't want to drive a car thats smarter than me. Theres no telling what could happen with these cars.\n\nYes they may have been tested and everything but the outcome may vary with different cars. If you ever did wreck I could just imagine how much it would cost to do all of the repairs. Thats why I wouldn't suguest driveless cars.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think driverless cars are not a good idea. I feel that the car may sometimes glitch and cause a wreck. The car could also lose its sense of where its going and take you to a different destination. The car is also making people lazy. I think that people would be better just driving their own cars. I believe that it would cause less havoc then having a computer driving you everywhere you go because you wouldnt have to worry about being ready to take over if the car needs you to.\n\nOn to my point about these computer cars causing wrecks. We all know that computers and machines all have glitches, so the car glitching wouldn't be all that surprising. If the car could lose focus on what it is doing and go off road, or it could brake late and rear-end the car infront of you, or it could also brake to hard and fast and you would get rear-ended.\n\nI also believe driverless cars could lose the directions of where to go and end up taking you to a place where you wouldnt wanna go. It would be very tedious if you had to keep putting in the directions because the car kept messing up the correct way to go. Also if the car loses its sense of direction it could turn you into traffic or do a wrong turn and cause a wreck. After all, nobody wants to go to the wrong destination anyways.\n\nI also think that driverless cars would make people more lazy than they already are. There are already Hoverboards, Self-cleaning vaccums, and other devices that are used so you dont have to do anywork. I think that having a computer driven car would also contribute to people becoming more lazy than they need to be. If people were in the car and the car needed the driver to take control of the car because it was in a difficult situation and the driver just didn't feel like reaching out his hands to drive the car, it would cause a wreck.\n\nIn general i think it would just be better if you let humans continue to drive their own cars. They would be more aware of their surroundings, Be able to drive through road hazards like construction zones and detours. Also they would have free range over where they would be going and wouldnt have to worry about going in the wrong direction or putting in the right destination.\n\nSo I stand on the side of people driving their own cars and not letting computers that have a possibility of malfunctioning drive us around. As the cars could could have an error and wreck; or have problems with directions; or even the simple fact that these cars would contribute to making people more lazy. I have also stated some appropriate details from the article to help support my claim on the driverless cars like how it could not take control on road hazards and other situations on the road. That is all i have to say about the subject. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the passage \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" study Venus can be very helpful but is very dangerous. I believe that even though it is dangerous we have to explore to see what else is out there. The possiblities could be endless and we have to know for sure what is on Venus.\n\nExploring Venus can open up many doors for the people of earth and should be explored sooner than later. Venus is very simliar to earth such as size and occasionally closest planet to earth at times. Landing on Venus is very hard because an aircraft has not survived longer than just a few hours on the surface and they have always been unmanned. The author states, \"Numerous factors contribute to Venus's reputation as a challenging planet for humans to study, despite its proximity to us\"(Challenge 2). This evidence shows how the autor knows in past studies have failed but that should not stop more missions because of what possiblities can occur. Everyone can say these things but it is very hard to do. Venus is one of the most dangerous planets for humans or spacrafts to visit. The author also states, \"On the plantes's surface, tempetures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own panet\"(Challenge 3). This evidence is not to show that we can not visit Venus jsut to show how there are many dangerous things on the planet that will make it difficult for humans to visit.\n\nVenus size and postion near the sun such as earth's give humans ideas that Venus could have well been an Earth-like planet. Venus has many similar qualites with Earth such as valleys, moutains, and craters. In the passage the author states, \"Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth\"(Challenge 4). This evidence shows how there could have been life on Venus long ago or could still have some sort of life. Knowing the information we have and the possibility of other life on Venus only means it must be explored. Making a return to Venus is no doubt a option in the future and very well could happen sooner than later. The author also states, \"The Value of returning to Venus seems indisputable, but what are the options for making such a mission both safe and scientifically productive?(Challenge 4). The returning to Venus is very much benefital to Earth, it is just the matter of making the trip safe and productive at the same time.\n\nThere have been many ideas to make the trip to Venus safe and more productive. NASA has come out with many ideas to help astronouts have safe ways to gather data on Venus. In the passage the author states, \"Just as our jet airplanes travel at a higher altitude to fly over many storms, a vechicle hovering over Venus would avoid the unfriendly ground conditions by staying up and out of their way\"(Challenge 5). This could improve the trip by keeping everyone on board safe and get a good view of the plant. The plane would not be affected and they could gather the date they need to make the trip more successful the next time. The author also states, \"Solar power would be plentiful, and radition would not exceed Earth levels. Not easy conditions, but survivable for humans\"(Challenge 5). The humans would still have to be careful of conditions even though they are survivable they are still harsh. The tempertures would be around 170 degrees Fahrenheit which is very toasty but humans can have gear built enough to survive in.\n\nA succesful trip to Venus could change all of space travel foever. The possoblities are endless and I believe that Venus was once like Earth but changed over time. Venus can be next step in figuring out are surroundings in space and if ther eis life anywhere else! ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Cars have been around for awhile and they have had a major impact on society. Many people believe that there is no problem with the frequency of cars being driven. But, there are many advantages to less car use such as improving our cities and suburbs, improving safety, and decreasing pollution.\n\nMany have tried to make cities a little more dense and better for walking but nothing has seemed to work; therefore, they have moved on to suburbs. Now, people are trying to make suburbs better for getting around while walking instead of driving. By doing so, places such as shops will be made closer and more convienent which allows people to be able to consider walking as a better option. By having these suburbs, and soon hopefully cities, reduce the amount of cars used, the people living in these areas will be able to accomplish more in a healthier and safer way.\n\nSafety has been an issue in almost all areas due to a variety of reasons; one being cars. People pass by \"Drive Safely\" signs or memorials on the side of the road too often. Many accidents occur because of all the cars and traffic and careless driving. By reducing the amount of cars being driven, the moment of deaths in car accidents can be reduced as well. In \"The End of Car Culture\", author Elisabeth Rosenthal states, \"Mine (19 and 21) have not bothered to get a driver's license, even though they both live in places where one could come in handy. They are interested, but it's not a priority. They organize their summer jobs and social life around where they can walk or take public transportation or car-pool with friends.\" Recently, teenagers who are able to get their license haven't really made it a priority. This could be caused by factors such as fear of driving or just because they've figured out a way around driving. Not everyone needs a car to get around; there are plenty of other ways to safely get from point A to point B.\n\nAnother large issue cars contribute to is pollution. Pollution is in every city, every state, every country, every continent. Cars are \"a huge impediment to current efforts to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions from tailpipes...\" (Rosenthal, Elisabeth, \"In German Suburb, Life Goes on Without Cars\"). Cars don't help with environmental issues what-so-ever. They add to the smog issues and they increase the about of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. In the capital of France, for example, congestion was down sixty percent due to smog causing delivery companies to lose money since they couldn't delieve what was needed. Cars are extremely harmful to the environment and they make the issues we already have even larger. By limiting car usage, people could hopefully work on repairing the damage we have already done to the environment instead of worsening it.\n\nCars have impacted society ever since they were made. By reducing the amount of cars driven, cities and suburbs can be improved, better safety can be implimented, and pollution will reduce. Until then, the issues cars create will continue to get worse and by the time people see it, the problems will be too late to fix. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The advances in the medical field are nothing short of amazing. The fact that a computer can tell us how we are feeling to the exact percent is jaw dropping. Classrooms could definitly benefit from this in the future, and I am sure that they will.\n\nEveryone that has been through school and attended high school has been forced to sit through an hour long lesson that you have no intrest in what so ever. Most of these lessons have homework to follow up what was just taught to you. If you aren't paying attention how are you supposed to figure out the homework? This is when the system could be used extremly effectively.\n\nA teacher that might question weather or not his or her lesson is bring can check the computer and see how much of the class is happy and enjoying the lesson vs. the how many students are angry or upset with the lesson. Knowing this type of information, the teacher can change their lesson plan to accordingly. As stated in the article, you can't fake emotions and trick the system. Therefore, if a teacher notices that a student has been sad for the past 3 days in class, he or she can talk to that student and figure out if the school counselor needs to get involved.\n\nAlthough this type of software can improve classrooms all over the world, teachers can't rely on it completely. An important part of a student's day is interacting with everyone and creating different relationships. A teacher needs to do the same thing and not only figure kids out by looking at a computer monitor but by talking to the children and getting to know them. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars will be a great innovation in the automobile insustry, because driverless cars will be safer, more convenient, and possibly more fuel efficient.\n\nDriverless cars would make the world a lot safer, when dealing with automobiles. People die everyday in car accidents. With driverless cars, at first, of course, there will be complications regarding the sensing and accident prevention. After so long, with yearly upgrades and constant innovation, driverless cars' software should excel to the point of perfection, without any accident occurance. In paragraph 5, the test states, \"Sensors are nothing new, of course. in the 1980s, automakers used speed sensors at the wheels in the creation of antilock brakes. Within 10 years, those sensors had become more advanced to detect and respond to the danger of out-of-control skids or rollovers. The information from the sensors can cause the car to apply brakes on individual wheels and reduce power from the engine, allowing far better response and control than a human driver could manage alone. Further improvements in sensors and computer hardware and software to make driving safer are also leading to cars that can handle more and more driving tasks on their own.\" This example shows that sensoring software ability is increasing, and as time goes by technologists learn more and more. Over time sensors will get better and better to the point where driverless cars are 100% safe.\n\nDriverless cars are more convenient than cars with drivers. Cars with drivers require full attention from the driver. There are many cases, involving possibly injury, or even just fatigue, where a driver is forced into a position of either finding alternate transportation, or driving under dangerous circumstances. If a driver owns a driverless car, or has the accessability to a driverless \"taxi\", then whether fatigue, injured, or intoxicated, the driver, or now passenger, can safely be transported to their destination, without the result of an accident. Many people against the idea of driverless cars would claim that a driver must still be alert with a driverless car. This statement would be true, as of now, but if driverless cars are introduced now, within the next ten years, driverless cars will be so dominantly present, drivers would never have to touch the wheel. If every car on a street is computer controlled, the computer systems could recognize another attempting to leave a parking lot and simply leave the car space to do so. Through more innovations, obstacles like those stated in paragraph 7, would be easily manuvered.\n\nDriverless cars are more fuel efficient than cars with drivers. Many times today, people drive their cars with a \"heavy foot.\" Acceleration uses gas in a car that could be saved with coasting. If are car is ran by a computer, acceleration and coasting time would be monitored, and done the most efficiently possible. In paragraph 1, the text states, \"The cars [Google cofounder Sergey Brin] forsees would use half the fuel of today's taxis...\" This example shows that, driverless taxis and cars are far more fuel efficient. If a driverless car owner uses only half the fuel of a driver required car owner, then the driverless car owner is saving a tremendously more amount of money on fuel.\n\nDriverless cars will be a great innovation in the automobile insustry, because driverless cars will be safer, more convenient, and possibly more fuel efficient. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "This new technology \"Facial Action Coding System\" is great, and should be used in special cases when needed. Though I disagree with having this kind of technology in schools. I think it is useless and wasteful to those making this tech. Schools are already caught up in many other bills, and needing to fix important things. Today, schools can barely keep up with the technology being used now. The school system still believes that we should teach from books, rather than use tablets and save money. Other problems would include security, and air conditioning. Even if schools did use this facial coding system, what would it be used for and who would use it?\n\nOne example I could see this technology be used for is conseling. This can be useful for the teacher to see how a person is really feeling. Teachers and staff may think this is extremely benificial, so it'll prevent suicides and school shootings. But at times their are students who really do not want to talk about how they feel. Using this technology on a student may make them feel very invasive and uncomfortable. Arguments will be brought out, and maybe parents will disagree with this technology in situations like these. It is not good for a student to hold in their pain, but everyone handles their business different ways. Student's problems should not be exploited by force from this technology.\n\nIn conclusion, I think this technology is brillient for artists and other peoples' uses. It may be useful for other workers jobs, and benefit people. Though I disagree with having this sort of technology in students classroom. I think it would not be useful in any way, even if used for conseling it could cause problems. Also, if schools are interested in buying this product, they should have their money straight first before hand. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Using the Facial Action Coding System in a classroom setting has the potential to be a valuable tool for the advancement of education. Being able to understand when students are confused or bored is crucial to their success in later life. The software, if working properly, could help teachers advance their teaching strategies to form a better learning experience.\n\nBeing stuck in a room for an hour listening to a teacher ramble about isotopes is not engaging enough students in schools. However, there is not necessarily a way to prove this, unless this software is legitimate and reliable. Being able to prove what engages students and what doesn't has the potential to spark a massive change in education. The methods students are taught with and even the content of what is being taught would need to change. Students are the future and they need to be able to absorb information, not have it told to them. When a student is not engaged, they do not learn, and learning is the most important thing students need to be doing. This software could help teachers recognize when a student is not engaged, prompting the teacher to change up the way they are teaching, as stated by this excerpt from the article, \"'A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored,' Dr. Huang predicts. 'Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor'\" (D'Alto). In the classroom, the emotions of students are typically not conveyed in full truth. Students typically fake interest and engagement by nodding their heads and fake reading. Perhaps with a different approach to the lesson from teachers, students interest and engagement will be honest and true.\n\nConfusion is yet another widespread issue in classrooms, however, students would rather make a reputation of understanding than to actually understand. This is caused by their peers, of course. In order to avoid embarrasment, students will not raise their hand to admit they have no clue what the teacher just said. This is a constant problem because when test day comes it is far too late to ask that question about what was taught three weeks ago. Upon recognizing confusion, the teacher has the option to slow down, elaborate further, or give the student time to see them for one to one learning time, which is sometimes the best thing for students. Teachers need to adapt to what their students need more often, and the software has a great chance to be able to help with that endevoar.\n\nWhen students begin to become who they are, this software could be helpful in determining the way that they learn best. This is crucial in a classroom setting because the teachers can then tailor their lesson plans and teaching methods around this information. This will optimize the students learning experience, making learning more enjoyable and more influential. This information could help colleges find students that fit their university, and could also help students find the college that best suits their academic needs. Engaging students in learning at an early age changes the courses of their lives forever. This could eventually lead to less people on the streets, lower unemployment rates, and a better economy, not to mention better quality of life in general. Education is more crucial than ever and tailoring the learning eperience around the student is the best way to improving this.\n\nThe classroom has been a dreary, empty-feeling place for too long. Now we have the chance to change that. With the Facial Action Coding System, the opportunity for positive change is at our fingertips. This needs to be taken advantage of. The Facial Action Coding Software has the potential to be the most influential tool used in the classroom. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Every year, we get closer and closer to the reality of driverless cars. While technology can be a huge asset to our society, we must be wary of how much trust we place in machines. Unless we are one hundred percent sure that the machines we make are flawless, we should not use driverless cars.\n\nWith every situation, there are millions of different senarios of how the situation will play out. It is impossible for humans to account for all of these senarios for every situation. Therefore, we cannot program a machine that knows what to do at all times, no matter what. We live in a world where humans cannot be trusted to keep themselves or others safe on the road, (ie., drunk and/or underaged drivers) , and where we still have trouble with computers, a technology that has been around for some people's entire life times. Combine these two issues and we have a driverless car that is a major risk of the safety of the public.\n\nIf we use cars that are mostly driverless and only need a human driver during complicated situations, we open up a whole new world of possibilities that is full of room for error. As it says many times within the article, the human driver must be vigilant and ready to take over as a manual driver. When not manually driving, the human driver could get distracted and bored and maybe even fall asleep, making him or her not able to take over the wheel when neccessary. This makes it very dangerous for the driver and his/her passengers, other cars, and pedestrians. Another way this could go wrong is if the car itself makes a mistake and kills someone. These machines are only as perfect as human being that created it. Stepping into a driverless car means that the passenger is placing his/her entire life on the reliablility of a machine created by an imperfect individual.\n\nDriverless cars are unreliable because of humans' guarrenty for error, and unsafe because of the car's ability to breakdown or go on the spritz. For these reasons, driverless cars should stay a thing of comic books and science fiction movies. These cars are too great of a risk for the human race. We do not need another painful way for people to get hurt or die.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Are you on a long trip and brought snacks but cant reach them because there in the backseat? If you reach back there with a human driven car you're very likely to crash. I have a suggestion why not try a driverless car. Driverles cars can provide you with a way to get to things you need without worrying about crashing.\n\nMy position on driverless cars is their a great invention and need for society. I say this because it will cause less accidents from people trying to reach in the backseat to grab something they want.''Google cars have driven a million miles without a crash.\n\nHave you ever dosed off while driving the smart car will allow you to catch a few z's and will alert you when something goes wrong on the road.''Google cars alert you when pulling in and out of driveways,navigating through roadwork,and dealing with road accidents. With the driverless car this will allow people to be more rested but still be alert when necassery.\n\nHave you ever texted while driving or thought about texting while driving? Having a driverless car wil allow you to be hands free while in open road which will allow you to do the things you need to do.''In car system is actually a safety feature,and safety is a big concern.\n\nFor my conclusion I say you should pick up a driverless car because it can allow more things to be took care of. Also it would prevent texting and driving due to the in car sysem which displays things you need or messages you want to see. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "We have all wondered about what other planets are like, but some of the closest planets to us we have never layed a foot on. The author of \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" supports the idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents to a strong extent. The author supports the idea in the fact that Venus may have been very similar to Earth at one point during time, and NASA is trying to come up with a way to make it possible to explore the mysterious planet.\n\nVenus is a planet that is very close to us, but we know almost nothing about due to its extreme conditions. The author of \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" supports the idea of attempting to study Venus because of how close it was to Earth's characteristics. The article states,\" Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life,just like Earth,\"(4). The idea of another planet being alike to ours is very appealing to people, and the author seems to agree that there should be trips made to explore the planet. The article also says,\" The planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and craters,\"(4). The similarities could potentially have a connection to what Earth could possibly be after everything is gone. If so, then scientists need to be able to study this planet with a very open eye.\n\nThe planet Venus is very dangerous to anything that attempts to get close to it. The author provides information over what NASA is doing to try and further the studies of Venus. He says,\" NASA is working on other approaches to studying Venus. For example, some simplified electronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating the chaos of Venus's surface and have lasted for three weeks in such conditions,\"(7). The author cares about what they are doing to try to make the pursuit of the planet more safe and attainable. The author also says,\" Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation,\"(8). The author seems very supportive when it comes to broadening our minds, and horizons of the future of pursuiting the planet of Venus.\n\nTo end with the author of \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" very well layed out his/her opinions on what the limits should be on the amount of discovery we do. From Earth posssibly being similar to Venus in the future to NASA coming up with ways to explore and take samples from the ground of Venus the author seems very on board with continuing with Venus even though there are many dangers at play.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\", the author suggests that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit by presenting examples of how NASA is trying their best to find a way to survey Venus, as well as state how these examples could work, and why NASA is wanting to go to Venus at all.\n\nIn paragraph 4, the author states \"Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in out solar system. Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth. Today, Venus still has some features that are analogous to those on Earth. The planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and craters. Furthermore, recall that Venus can sometimes be out nearest option for a planetary visit, a crucial consideration given the long time frames of space travel. The value of returning to Venus seems indisputable[.]\"\n\nThe author stating the reasons why NASA (as well as other astronomers) wants to go to Venus is exactly the answer to the question. The planet could have Earth-like minerals or even evidence of past life that may have lived there long ago. Going to Venus would be risky, but given the opportunity we should explore all the planets we can, just to see what it's like.\n\nLike Christopher Columbus exploring new lands around the world, we should be pioneers in the context of space exploration. Seeking out new life, and to go where no man has gone before, for the sheer benefit of exploration. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear Senator,\n\nI feel the need to eliminate the Electoral College process of voting and just have a regular election where the President with the most votes wins, as simple as that. Each vote counts as one, and there will be more or less votes depending on the state and its size and population.\n\nJust like Source 2, I feel \"The Electroal College is unfair, outdated, and irrational. \" \"Abolish the electroal college!\". When you vote, you vote for \"a slate of electors, who in turn elect the President\" (Source 2, Paragraph 2). Why can't it just be a regular election where you either bubble your democrat or republican representative instead of being so complicated and misleading. This can get people confused, and get them to vote for the wrong candidate without them even realizing! \"Do voters sometimes get confused about the electors and vote for the wrong candidate? Sometimes.\" (Source 2, Paragraph 2). In the 2000 campaign, 17 states didn't even get to see the candidates in a campaign ads; they focus on the \"bigger\" and more important swing-states to win. Each person should count as one, and each state should be as important as the other, just varying in the number of voters they had.\n\nIn Source 1, it says how \"The Electoral College process consists of the selection of the electors, the meeting of the electors where they vote for President and Vice President, and the counting of the electoral votes by Congress.\" You're electing electors instead of just who you want for President. To top it off, you can't even control who your electors vote for! So people can vote for an elector thinking that he's going to vote for the Republican party but then he votes for the Democratic party. This process can be very misleading. \"Can voters control whom their electors vote for? Not always.\". The disaster factor as mentioned in Source 2 could aways occur.\n\nSome counter-arguments might include the certainty of outcome, and how the Electoral Vote might be greater than the Popular Vote. But at the end of the day, the people are nominating their president, they don't want others to do it for them. The Popular Vote representing our country as a whole with all individual votes added up should be the deciding factor. A tie is almost impossible in that circumstance also, because what are the chances out of millions of citizens the number would be perfectly split in half. If a president appeals for a region, then let them vote for who they believe is the better candidate. At the end of the day, the majority wins. Swing states won't have to be a factor without the Electoral College, and big states are just counted them same, one point per vote. Run-off elections won't be necessary if the highest percentage president wins, even if its not majority.\n\nSo, hopefully you see my view on this issue and the Electoral College can be eliminated.\n\nSincerely,\n\nGabe ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Ever wondered how your peers feel like but don't know, well now you do! Due to new technology by Dr. Paul Eckman, you can now tell how someone is feeling. But is this new technology useful? And is it reliable? Well let me inform you about it.\n\nIs this new technology FACS (Facial Action Coding System) actually useful? Yes it is, what if \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored\", well as stated in paragraph 6, the computer \"... could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\" This technology could contribute to the teacher, in multiple ways.\n\nWell according to Dr Eckman, he has programmed the system to classify \"six basic emotions- happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness...\" These six basic emotions are then \"associated each with characteristic movements of the facial muscles\". These muscles are Frontalis pars lateralis (above your eyes) which raise your eyebrows when you're surprised; your orbicularis oris (around your mouth) tightens your lips to show anger.\n\nWell now that you no about this new technology, you might be able to figure out how someone is feeling, just by the facial expressions that they show. And yes it is useful, and actually reliable.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Face on Mars is just a natural landform. Now you might disagree, but hear me out. Michael Malin and his Orbiter Camera team snapped a picture ten times sharper than the original Viking photos. The image first appeared on a JPL wed site, revealing a natural landform. There was no alien monument at all. Perhaps, you may say that alien markings were hidden by haze.\n\nNevertheless, on Apirl 8, 2001, a cloudless summer day in Cydonia, Mars Global Surveyor drew close enough for a second look. What the picture actually shows is that's just a landform. In the passage Garvin says, \"Thats a lava dome that takes the form of an isolated mesa about the same height as the Face on Mars.\" If it was created my aliens, then why would it be there in the first place? Why would aliens create a illusion of a human face? There might've been small volcanoes on Mars that erupted and over time the lava hardened then it was covered in the same color as Mars. Since there is no gravity and things tend to move, the half harded lava moves up slower and created bumps. The shadows might've create a illusion.\n\nIn conclusion, the Face on Mars is just a natural landform. The Earth has landforms that could look like diffrent shapes too. And to top that off, look at Africa! Africa's continent looks like an elephant head! So to my conclusion...the Face on Mars is just a natural landform. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Introduction: In the story, \"The challenge of Exploring Venus\". The planet venus is the second planet in the solar system and the closest from the sun right behind mercury the smallest planet.\n\nBody Paragraph#1: Venus is the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system, closest planet by mercury and Venus has the different speed from other planets is like turning the axis in the solar system.\n\nBody Paragraph#2: Venus has a thick atmosphere of almost 97% carbon dioxide in Venus. In Venus is like about the temperature aveage over 800 degrees Fahreheit is really really hot.\n\nBody Paragraph#3: When Astronomers was talking about the planet Venus like has rocky sediment and include such as valleys, mountains and craters.\n\nConclusion: When the National Aeronautics and Space Administation (NASA) was sending humans to study the planet Venus. When NASA has a very possible solution with Venus and it part of pressure, heat and other forces. Meet the challenge presented by Venus has atmosphere and temperatures is heated closest to the sun.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Each spacecraft that went to land on thus cloud-draped world was unmanned. No spacecraft survived the landing for more than a few hours. Maybe this explains why not a single spaceship has touched down on Venus in more than three decades. The atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet.\n\nNumerous factors contribute to Venus's reputation as a challenge planet for humans to study the despite its proximity to us. A thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide covers Venus. Even more challenging are the clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere. On the planet's surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees.\n\nThey say long ago venus was probably covered largerly with oceans, and could support various forms of life. Today Venus still has some features that are analogous to those on Earth. The planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features. Solar power would be plentiful and radiation would not exceed earth levels.\n\nNasa is working on other approaces to studying Venus. Another project is looking back to an old technology called mechanical computers. These devices were first wnvisioned in the 1800s. And played an important role in the 1940s during World War II.\n\nI think going to Venus and studying it would be dangerous. I think it would be dangerous because the temperature seems to get very high on Venus. If the temperature were to get the high it would not be a good idea to go because you would probably die instantly. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Are you for or against the development of driverless cars? I am for the development of these cars. It sounds interesting to me. It can help those drivers who is unable to drive because of some kind disabilt in their body. It keeps a driver from falling a sleep behind the wheel and hurting someone because if the car is driverless, you can fall a sleep with out hurting anyone. The details that agree with what I wrote came from the passage. This is the first thing in the passage that agree with what I wrote. The line about the steering came from line four. The part about the cars steering themselves came in the passage part, number seven.\n\nThe passage says the cars can steer themselves. The details that agree with what I wrote came from the passage. This is the second thing in the passage that agree with what I wrote. This is the public trainsport system line that came from line three. The part about public trainsport system came in the passage at part number one. The passage says that the public trainsport system will some day be driverless. The details that agree with what I wrote came from the passage. This is the four thing in the passage that agree with what I wrote. This is the half fuel of today's cars line that came from line three. The part about half fuel of today's cars came in the passage at part number one. The passage says that the cars will use half of the fuel of today's cars. That is sounds easier than it is. It is realiy hard. Driverless cars are possible. The cars so far still need a driver for some of the things. The car can do the steering. That sounds easier than it is. It is realiy hard, it just take some time. Driverless cars are possible. The cars so far still need a driver for some of the things. The car can do the breaking. That is sounds easier than it is. It is realiy hard. Driverless cars are possible. The cars so far still need a driver for some of the things. The car can do the accelerating on it's own but it still needs a driver. I am for the development of these cars. It sounds interesting to me. It can help those drivers who is unable to drive because of some kind disabilt in their body. It keeps a driver from falling a sleep behind the wheel and hurting someone because if the car is driverless, you can fall a sleep with out hurting anyone. I hope this essay showed my place on the subject of driverless cars.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Arguements on whether the state senator should favor in keeping the Electoral College or change to election by popular vote for the president of the United States are occuring today. Each favor has its advantages and disadvantages, but we should favor in keeping the Electoral College. This is because less disputes are likely to happen and not voting will not effect the election.\n\nOn the other hand, changing to election by popular vote for the president of the United States has some advantages. In \"Source 2: The Indefensible Electoral College: Why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong\", author Bradford Plumer claims \"the electoral college is unfair, outdated, and irrational\" because \"candidates don't spend time in states they know they have no chance of winning.\" This means that the candidates focus on the \"tight races of the 'swing' states.\" To continue, Plumer also argues that changing to election by popular vote makes every vote count;however, chaning to election by popular vote will cause mant disputes and it is not the right way to keep everyone satisfied with voting for a new president. Keeping the Electoral College is more realistic.\n\nTo begin, the Electoral College is fair to the states, leaving fewer disputes. In \"Source 3: In Defense of the Electoral College: Five reasons to keep our despised method of choosing the President\", author Richard A. Posner explains that the Electoral College \"restores some of the weight in the political balance that large states lose by virtue of the mal-apportionment of the Senate decreed in the Constitution.\" The Electoral College gives larger states more attention from presidential candidates as opposed to a smaller state. Posner continues the idea with \"the most thoughtful voters should be the ones to decide the election.\" To break it down, voters who pay close attention to the campaign will be the most thoughtful voters and they will recieve the most attention from the candidates. This reduces the amount of disputes because the presidential candidates will decide on who to give the most attention to.\n\nIn addition, the Electoral College method does not get affected by the ones who chose not to vote. In Defense of the Electoral College: Five reasons to keep our despised method of choosing the President\", author Richard A. Posner states that \"knowing [the voters'] vote has no effect [gives them] less incentitive to pay attention to the campaign.\" But, \"voters in presidential electons are people who want to express political preference rather than people who think that a single vote may decide and election.\" This means thatchanging everyone to a single vote will have no effect, too because people will not put thought into who to vote, but they will just vote for whoever.\n\nTo conclude, the state senator should favor in keeping the Electoral College rather than changing to election be popular vote for the president of the United States because less disputes will occur and not participating will not be effective. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The additonal to Facial Action Coding Systems in classrooms would be extremely valuable to schools and making them a more efficent, healthy, and conflict free place to learn. In \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\" the author discribes new technology to better understand how one shows emotion with the face. It also offers several possible uses for this technology including in school classrooms to detect emotions of students. If implimented the FACS could be used to engage students more, find signs of mental illness in students, and help school staff to stop conflict before it gets to its worst point.\n\nThe article suggests that the system could \" recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored ... Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor\" While the current times could certainly not see an A.I\n\nmake a good, well writen curriculum versus an actual teacher. This could be a way to collect data on the emotions of students, and have instructors modify their plan to be more engaging if many students are bored or more slow paced if most students are confused. It would also provide a more unbiast source that other more conventinal ways of evaluating lessons like a questionaire. As during a questionaire a student many be more likely to lie if they like the teacher and give them a more positive score or lie and give them a more negitive score if they dislike the teacher. Many times in highschool class rooms the teacher will ask if there is any confusion and many students who are shy or introverted will hesitate to say anything. However, with this new technology teachers could know if any students were confused with relitive certainty. Helping students who may lag behind otherwise, this would in turn raise graduation rates and help the school in general.\n\nThe next possible use for this in classrooms would be to offer a possible recommendation to a doctor on if the student has a mental health problem. An example could be when a student is distracted often and shows other signs of the illness the algorithm could recommend the student to go into a real doctor to get ADHD tests done. The inventor of this system has already said that it could be helpful in another medical setting saying it could \"make computer-animated faces more expressive-for...video surgery.\" so it could be useful in this way as well. Obviously this would not be 100 percent reliable, however, doctors could use it as another source of data in additon to their medical expertice.\n\nThe technology could also be used to stop conflict before it begins in many schools. Bulling is often seen as one of the hardest problems to stop in school, but a school may have an easier job at doing so with this system. For example if the emotions of strong emotions like, as the author states that the system can already detect, \" anger..., fear, and sadness\" then a conflict mediator can go the place the emotions are happining before something like a fight, bullying, or threats can get to their worst points and prevent them from happining.\n\nThis reasons that the Facial Action Coding System could be used in the educational sector are signifigant and far reaching.This introduction to schools could be just what schools need to fight low graduation rates, growing mental problems in the school system, and qualm the conflicts that often erupt between students. The end result being a better school system in general with the additon of this technology to classrooms around the globe. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author of the passege wants to explore the planet Venus. The supports to this idea don't seem like the right fit to encourge someone it's a good idea to explor Venus. Although the planet Venus is the closest to earth in many ways, the planet is very dangerous. Venus havd mountains, valleys, and crators just like earth. The planet has 97 percent of carbon dioxide blankets covering the thick atsomsphere. The average temeratures on the planet range over 800 degrees fahrenheit. Venus's atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on earth. So why do scientist continue to discuss about exploring Venus even though they know of the dangers there. Some Scientist believe that Venus had large oceans and could have had life there. None of the space crafts heading to Venus never lasto more than a few hours. In conclusion these are the reasons why I believe the author used bad supports for their idea, of exploring Venus.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "BOOM! The car is off the road. Why? the car could not take the proper commands from the owner and a family is now hurt and have severe injuries. Driveless cars are not good to people or society because they can take away jobs from everyday people like taxi drivers, there are a lot of traffic issues already, and they are computer made so it can be hacked.\n\nDriveless cars are bad to people because they can take aways jobs from people like taxi drivers and bus drivers. These are the jobs that people have and use the money to support them. By adding a car that is controlled by a computer, they can take away the jobs of hundreds of people. Let's think abou the families income that is being hurt. No job, means no money, no money means that you can't pay your bills and will have to live on the street. Just by adding driveless cars it will hurt the economy, it is amazing what one simple thing can do.\n\nDriveless cars are bad to public because the people from the BMV would have to make new laws incase accidents happen in traffic. In the big cities in California\n\nwhere the traffic is busy all the time, they have to make these changes. How is some supposed to get the information that need if the car is driving itself. The insurence companies are going to have to make new plans for things like this. There is a lot of changes that is going to happen due to the driveless car.\n\nDriveless cars are controlled by computers. What would happen if the cars shuts off in the highway and and family is in the way of others. Some cars won't stop in time and can cause many injuries. What are hackers good at? The answer is hacking. Believe it or not, there are evil people out in this world and are capable of doing many things just to get revenge. There are people out there that are able to hack into things and take them over. If one of these cars gets hacked and the hacker decides to drive the cars off the cliff. I don't even want to think about it.\n\nIn conclusion to my argument, driveless cars are not good to people or society because they take away jobs from others, they are going to cause to many traffic issues, and many computer made items are able to be hacked. Jobs will be lost due to the change of this vehicle. Traffic issues will occur more often. We as people underestimate the capabilities that the hackers have. They can do more than just take over a car, they can ruin lives. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "No, I dont think that using a facial coding system on your computers would be usefull or we wouldnt need it in a classroom. The only reason that could be useful would maybe be for a lab or in a phycology class. They wouldnt come to any use in a classroom because most kids in a class dont show much emotion. the process would take a while to do in a classroom also because it has to take a 3-D model of your face and makes all 44 major muscles in your face to determine if your happy, sad, anger, stressed, disgusted, etc.\n\nThe Facial Action Coding Sytem can detect your emotions even when you are trying to hide them, The software weighs the diffrent units in a face or in a painting or a picture. People can perform this same type of research just by looking at a person or a friend. But the software can get every emotion just by looking at the persons muscles. The software can also pick up if a person is putting on a fake smile because of the muscles and there facial expression.\n\nAccording to the Facial Feedback Theory of emotion if you dont put a fake smile on and actually smile this could help produce these emotions. Some drama club teachers use a technique that helps the emotions look more realistic. The drama coach makes the actors or performers smile then frown so it helps them produce this emotion faster and more realistic.This helps the crowd with the emotions because people often imitate other peoples facial expressions unconsiously. But this could be a huge step for the science of emotions.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Do you know you love farm animals ? Do you really love the open sea ? Have you ever tried them both together ? Do you want to try them together ? Well now you can sgin up today in the seagoing coyboys . You get to help the animals you love,and get time on the sea and you get to see all the sites.\n\nIf you want to travle and you love animals and the sea a seagoing coyboy would be a great job for you ! If Luke can do it so\n\ncan you . It might be a riskie job sometimes but it might be great if you\n\nlike it things like that. You can have the time of your life on some of the trips. If you like going to unique trips like Europe and China this would be a great job for you.\n\nYou might have the time of your life when you do not even know it . Great oppunites like this do not just fall from the sky. This may be a once and a life time oppunite do not take it for granted because you might not see this again. If you are lucky you be on the next boat to Europe or China. Hopefully you will make the right choice and join the seagoing cowboy's program.\n\nThis job may be for you it also might destory you so you might want to see if you get sea sick or if you can not stand the smell of animal dong or you do not like leaving town you might not want to take the job then. If you are ok with the smell of animal dong and do not get sea sick and you love leaving town this might be a great job for you. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars is a great way for transportation.\n\nFirst of driverless cars save millions of dollars.\n\nIt save you money and the goverments money. Here why, these cars will use half the fuel todays cars use. With that being said you can use that extra gas money for something more important. These car not only save money but they save you that extra time to relax unless the driver has to take over to go around traffic or around an accident.\n\nSecond driverless cars are safe. These cars have sensors to detect if theres a car accident, work zone, or traffic near.\n\nWhen that occurs these cars have alerts such as seats vibrating or the car turning of any distraction so the driver can take over and be alert.\n\nDriverless cars are also being worked on to include cameras to watch that the driver is keeping an eye on the road and isnt distracted.\n\nThis can help issure that drivers arent distracted and are ready and alert.\n\nDriverless cars are a great way to begin a new future. There special features and alerts can keep these drivers safe and happy.\n\nThis is a great way to help reduce accidents. Not just that but driverless cars also save you money.\n\nNothing like a great wait to enjoy some extra relaxing time inbeteween your drives. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Now and days, our world has transformed from using simple transportation to one source: the automobile. However, recent studies have shown our slow progression for the past years, discovering other ways of getting to point A to point B by having programs, reducing pollution and smog along the way, and living in an affordable economy.\n\nTo begin with, cities in our world have proven to be \"car-free cities\" by allowing programs to show other ways of transportation and reducing pollution and smog along the way. In Bogota, Colombia, a program where it is \"a car free day\", millions of Colombian's hike, bike, skate, or take buses to work and as Enrique Riera mentions in source 3, \"It's a good opportunity to take away stress and lower air pollution (paragraph 24)\". Colombia has been hosting this program since the 1990's and it has spread around the world; the influence Colombia has done is beyond incredible. Although the program is not held everyday, it impacts the world slowly. Also, in source 2, the usage of car in France has decreased drastically because of the \"intensifying smog (paragraph 14)\". Because their tax policy \"favors diesal over gasoline (paragraph 16)\", they're required to use diesal, but the French decide to rebel to save the enviroment, in result causing delivery companies to complain. Although, because the French did use less cars it made the smog clear up. In all, programs such as the one held in Colombia influence all arts of the world with showing other ways of transportation and even saving the enviroment.\n\nIn addition, the world continues to reduce the use of cars because it becomes more affordable to the people. When the economy crashed in the United State's, people relied on their cars, until they realized it was too expensive to pay gas, pay parking, but needed an alternative and as it says in source 4, \"people who stopped car commuting as a result of the recession may find less reason to resume the habit...(paragraph 36)\". People do not want to go back to a car based economy. They're finding other affordable sources. Not only does the usage of cars affect people financially, but also emotionally. In Vauban, Germany, as a result of forbidding street parking, house garages and fee's, 70 percent of the famalies do not own cars and Heidrun Walter, a mother of two, who usually bikes, expesses herself about the situation in source 1, \"When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way,\". Clearly, the use of less cars result in a finacial plus and an emotional change as well.\n\nIn conclusion, \"car free days\" are much more effective in a way that demonstrates the world other options of transportation, an opportunity to save the enoviroment, and an affordable economy to all. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "How often do you ride in a car? Do you drive a one or any other motor vehicle to work? The store? To the mall? Have you ever thought about how many people in the world do that exact same thing- travel to every destination using a fuel powered motorvehicle. Not many people realize the intenisve damage that they're doing when they turn their key in the egnition. What if you didn't drive to work today? If you're like any regular car user, the thought \"What?! I could never survive without my car!\" may run through your mind. It is possible though, to live without your main mean of transport. Just look at cities like Vuban, Paris, and Bogota; each one has in some way restricted their people's usage of cars and they actually enjoy it! If you limit your car usage, it can inturn result in many advantages and benefits in yourself and in your community.\n\nA not so recognized benefit to giving up your car usge would be the positive consequences it has on your health. In source 1, Heidrun Walter states that \"When [he] had a car, [he] was always tense. [He's] much happier [without it].\" Think about it, imagine all the angry road rage you experience while driving. That surely does not have a positive effect on your mood or health. Driving takes a copious amount of focus and mental activity, such as, trying to navigate, dealing with bad drivers, etc., that after a short period of time, you're stressed out and tired. In cities like New York and Paris, the population is high. This leads to congestion in the streets and excessive amounts of pollution. Warm layers of air, according to Robert Duffer in \"Paris bans driving due to smog,\" traps the car emissions. How is that healthy? He also states that Paris had to enforce a temporary driving ban after the pollution levels reached an all time record. After a few days of less driving the pollution went way down. Since people aren't driving, they have to find other means of transport. This could include walking, biking, or skating to destintions. Those are all physical excercises! Your body is getting to work out and you'll mentally feel fresher; more than you would sitting in a car.\n\nTaking a break from driving also can help with the overall look of your city. Pollution doesn't cause the flowers to grow. It certainly doesn't smell nice. It sets a filter over the town and gives off a \"dirty\" vibe. With less driving, there is less nasty pollution being emitted, therefore leading to a cleaner community. In Elisabeth Rosenthal's article, \"In German Suburb, Life goes on Without Cars,\" she gives the good point that since there is a restriction on car and motor vehicle transportation, there is going to be more walkers. If you have tons of people taking the sidewalks instead of the roads, you might need a few more pathways and closer stores that are in walking distance. Andrew Selsky states that \"Parks and sports centers have bloomed throughout the city; uneven pitted sidewalks have been replaced by broad, smooth sidewalks... and new restaurants and upscale shopping districts have cropped up.\"\n\nAs stated previously, pollution is not benefiting the environment. Organizations such as the Envronmental Protection Agency in the U.S., are promoting \"car reduced\" communities, says Rosenthal. These communities have far less pollution and are much cleaner. Cities are also promoting this idea and are having days devoted to \"no-car driving.\" In Bogota, Colombia, they hold an anual \"car-free\" day where only buses and taxis are permitted. Any other drivers would be fined. Although fining someone for using a posession they own might ruffle some feathers, it did have a successful turn out and significantly reduced the \"smog.\"\n\nIn conclusion, although the idea of giving up our precious automobiles for walking to our destination might sound impossible, it's not. Reducing our driving can lead to many benefits and advantages in our daily lives. These include an increase in health, an improved look to our cities, and an improved environment all around us. So, instead of picking up the car keys next time you have to go to work, try dusting off the helmet and take a bike ride! ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Imagine being able to detect exactly how other people are felling, even when they are trying to hide their emotions.\" says Nick D' Alto. There is a new software called Facial Action Coding System that can scan your face and know all of your emotions. The creator of this software is Professor Thomas Huang from the Beckman Institude for Advanced Science at the Univeristy of Illinios. He says the way it works is,\" The process begins when the computer sonstructs a 3-D computer model of the face; all 44 major muscles in the model must move like human muscles.\" as it staes in paragraph 3. For example,\"Frontalis pars lateralis muscle (above you eyes) raises you eyebrows when you're suprised; your orbicularis oris (around your mouth) tightens your lips to show anger.\" also stated in paragraph 3. This hows it knows were to read your face to get some of these emotions.\n\nThey should use the computer to read students emotions because it will conects the student with tecnology more when they have to interact with it and in our society we are using more and more tecnology anyways. In the text it states, \" Eckman has classified six basic emotions-happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness-and then associated each with characteristic movements of the facial miscles.\" This shows that this software already knows alot about what emotions the face can give off imagine what the software can do with body emotions. \"Imagine a comupter that knows when you're happy or sad.\" it states in papagraph 6. A comupter than detect your emotions towards what you are looking at, \"If you smile when a Web ad appears on your screen, a similar ad might follow. But if you frown, the next ad will be different.\" paragraph 6 states. If a computer can do this just think of how happier peolpe would when they see ads that they like instead of ads that make them sad or angry. That would change people.\n\nTo sum things up they should use FACS to look for the emotions in students. The students might like the idea of a computer looking for its emotions than a human. It will also connect students more with tecnology and help them get use to it as they get older. FACS can develope on and on and keep growing as the future comes, \"Imagine being able to detect exactly how other people are felling, even when they are trying to hide their emotions.\" says Nick D' Alto. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Pretty much all working adults and teenagers own or drive a vehicle on a daily basis. But while all that driving may get you from point A to point B quickly, it is also doing great damage. Constant driving has left cities polluted and covered in smog. People are finally beginning to realize that and have begun making necessary changes in order to prevent this from continuing.\n\nOne suburb in Vauban, Germany is a great example of people limiting car use and the positive impact that it has. This upscale community has generally forbidden street parking, driveways, and home garages so that the streets of Vauban are completely car-free. About 70 percent of families in Vauban do not own cars and over 50 percent sold their cars just to move there. Heidrun Walter, a Vauban local and mother of two, is quite pleased with the car ban. \"When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way.\" This ban has drastically reduced greenhouse gas emmisions that come from tailpipes on cars. You may think giving up your car ride to work every morning is a terrible idea, but living with pollution, smog, and gas emmisions that lead to breathing problems sounds even worse.\n\nThe driving ban in Paris, France shows just how bad driving all the time can be. Due to the cold nights and warm days in the popular city, the warmer layer of air trapped car emmisions - causing five days of smog. Being that France has a tax policy that favors diesel and in turn makes up over 60 percent of vehicles in France, it was to blame for the intense smog. After days of near-record pollution, the French party banned driving until the smog cleared. People were left with the choice of leaving their cars at home or facing a 22-euro fine. This goes to show you that your daily driving habits have long-lasting effects that should be taken care of sooner rather than later.\n\nFor another example of people striving to lower air pollution, look at Bogota - a city in Columbia that bans cars for one day every year on the annual Day Without Cars event. The purpose of this ban is to promote alternative transportation and reduce smog. It's obviously doing well because now two more Columbian cities, Cali and Vallendupar, are joining the event. Even authories from other countries have visitied Bogota to witness the event themselves and were quite enthusiastic. Enrique Riera, mayor of Asunción, Paraguay, said, \"These people are generating a revolutionary change [that] is crossing borders\" after attending Day Without Cars. More parks and sports centers have opened up and sidewalks are now being replaced with smoother sidealks for people to walk on. Bogota is just one city now realizing the negative impact constant driving has on the town, as well as its people, and taking steps to lower those impacts.\n\nIn conclusion, there are many disadvantages to driving all the time. Which means a lot of postive advantages when we stop. Going completely car-free can be difficult - especially if you are in an area without buses or taxis, but you can still limit your driving and reduce greenhouse gas emmisions and pollution. Don't take so many driving trips, car pool with friends, invest in a bike or shop at places closer to you. Limiting your car usage is something everyone can do and will postively affect your environment. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Would it be fun to be able to know what emotion or emotions others are feeling, stictly off of facial muscle movement? Yes, it would be quite interesting to have the ability to have some insight on what other people are thinking and feeling. Although the Facial Action Coding System is a very sharp piece of modern technology, is it truly a valuable invention? Yes, it is impressive and intelligent, but it does not seem to serve a larger purpose within a classroom enviornment. Thus, although the Facial Action Coding System is an impressive piece of modern technology, it is uneeded in a classroom enviornment because it is impractical, unecessary, could potentially be very stressful.\n\nTo begin, the Facial Action Coding System is impractical in todays society, especailly within a classroom enviornment. In the text it says that, \"your home PC can't handle the complex algorithms used to decode Mona Lisa's smile.\" So, in order to place this cutting-edge technology within schools would be a huge financial burden. Most schools only contain practical technology due to a strict, government driven budget. Attempting to fit such a modern piece of technology into the school system would not be practical, and in many cases, it would not be possible either. If the Facial Action Coding System was put into school systems, it could have to possibility to help decode bad mental health in some cases, but it could also cause the government to go even deeper into debt. Thus, because the Facial Action Coding system is predicted to be incredibly expensive, it is not a practical item for a classroom enviornment.\n\nNext, the Facial Action Coding System may be neat, but it is also unecessary. According to the text, it has the capability of showing when \"a smile is not being truthful,\" but lie-detector tests have already been invented for that. The article also states that,\"A classroom computer could recognize whne a student is becoming confused or bored,\" yet this is very evident in the body language of a student. Teachers do not need need a software that tells them that their students are not interested in their teaching material because it is shown through their actions. For example, if the student has their head down, is engaging in their own conversation during the lesson, or tends to sleep during class, this portrays to the teacher that they are bored or uninterested. Therefore, because there are already similar inventions and because observance of body language is a very practical tool, it is unecessary to use the Facial Action Coding System within a classroom enviornment.\n\nLastly, the Facial Action Coding Sytem has the potential of being very stressful to a student. A computer system that is able to publicly expose ones emotions could stir up fear and anxiety that was not within them before. Someone who has is struggling with their mental health does not needed to be reminded of this through their test results, especially while at school. There are plenty of other treatment options for issues like these. The Facial Action Coding System would strip students of emotional privacy, which could potentially stir up stress within a student. Considering that students are already under enough stress with standardized testing, the pressure to perform well in academics and athletics, and to fit in, they do not need an added stress in their life. In conclusion, the Facial Action Coding Sytem would do more harm than good and could potentially damage the mental health of the students.\n\nOverall, the concept of a the Facial Action Coding System is very captivating and intriuging, but it does not have many practical uses. It would place a financial burden among the school systems and could potentially stress students even more than they currently are. Thus, the Facial Action Coding Sytem would not be valuable wthin the clasroom setting. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "My opinion on driverless cars, i think it would be a stupid idea because i love to drive and im sure there are alot of other people who love to drive. Driverless cars could be a big problem, what if a driverless car had a malfunction and could wreck and kill somebody. Im sure the goverment would disagree with this idea because they love to make money, and all the money to make driverless cars would be outrageous, and that could make the goverment go in dept and it could ruin alot of things.\n\nNo details support my position because im against it, like i said i love to drive and i wanna be able to go wherever i want in the future and not have to worry about not having my own car because driverless cars just sound stupid. What if these driverless cars have a malfunction and just took off on its own i wanna be able to have my own car and drive on my own, because what if i end p getting a audi gr im sure ill be the one wanting to drive by myself and like i said everyone loves driving so i really dont like the idea.\n\nThese people who make the driverless cars such as nissan and audi, how do they know they can even make these cars to where it wont wreck on its own, or get us to where we need to go, the only thing i think would be cool about it is if i am tired and im driving and i need to go to sleep and the car could drive on its own, but what if a deer jumped in front of the car and the car is going 60 mph the car isnt just going to stop your going to wreck. If they really wanna make these cars they need to have good protection like a tank or sometin because that would be safe. Im still against it but it would be pretty cool to see what they can really do in the future. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Mona Lisa was happy 83 percent happy, 9 percent disgust, 6 percent fearful, and 2 percent angry. this show us that somehow computer software can recognize our emotion. at the University of Illinois, working collaboration with prof andd University of Amesterdam are experts at developing better ways for humans and computer to communicate. in the article say \"computer reconginze the subtle facial movements we human use to express how we feel\".\n\nDr. Huang and Dr. Paul Eckman was working on processing to begins when the computer constructs a 3-D computer modle of the face, Eckman has classified that six basic emotions are happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness. this is so true because when we have a lot of homework this emotion can relate to us. according to the text \" by the weight the different unite, the software can even identify mixed emotions.\n\nmost of us would havetroble actually describing each facial trait that conveys happy, worried. in fact, we humans perform this ame impressive calculation every day. Dr. Huang computer software stores similar antomical imformation as electronic code, perhaps Dr. Huang's emotion algorithms are different sort of \" Da Vinci code.\n\nImagine a computer also knows that when you're happy or sad. According to the article \" the same technology can amake computer-animated faces more expressive--for video games or video surgery\".\n\nthere is one question \" does your expression in the mirror suggest an emotion? yes, emotion instruction for a face that can look happy, sad,,,,etc. They are even indicate the difference between a genuine smile and foreced one. But in a false smile, the mouth is stretched sideways using the zygomatic major and different muscle, the risorius. according to the aricle \" used to spot when a smilling politician or clebrity isn't being truthful.\n\nFacial feedback theory of emotion, moving four facian muscles not only expresses emotion, but also may even help produce them. Constantin Stanislavsky, had his actors carefully reproduce smilling and frowining as a way of creating these emotions on state. according to the article \" Empathy felling may happen because we unconsiously imitate another person's facial expressions\". This is why Dr. Huang and Dr. Eckman was decovery about the emotion.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear Senator,\n\nI am arguing in favor of changing the Electoral College to the election of by popular vote. The process of the votes going through the various different places until it finally gets counted and determined who wins the state is unneccesary. The system is not even fair, for example in the year 2000 Al Gore had one the popular vote by 60%. Unfortunatley he lost the presidency because he did not win the the votes of the Electoral College. For a counry that is ran by the people, a vote of over 50% should always win. When you take into consideration how big the United States are, then cut that into half it is still a remarkable amount. Now picture a little over half the people in the United States voting for the same thing.\n\nThis process led to the \"biggest election crisis in a century\" says Bradford Plumer. According to this source the system can also allow for much worse. He even says that at the most basic level the Electoral college is unfair to voters because of the Winner-take-allsystem that occurs in each state. For the purpose of common sense why would we as a republic use a system that is \"unfair\"?\n\nRichard A. Posner says that the method of using the Electoral College method may even restrain potential voters for a specific candidate. All because they know that they're votes will have little to no impact on the outcome of the election. This also leads to the fact that would have no logical reason to pay attention to the campaign they would've picked. Plumer quotes that \" the Electoral College is outdated,unfair, and that Bob Dole was right in saying that we as acounty should abolish the Electoral College\".\n\nWhen everything is added up the same words such as unfair,outdated,useless, and unnessary keep coimg up on this topic. Not everybody in this country enjoys the use of the Electoral College and I strongly feel that eventually in this country the Electoral college will be left in the past and new methods of voting will be of greater use. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Before luke became a sea going cowboy he was just a regular old boy. he had two part time jobs one as grocery store guy and a banker. His life canged when his friend invited him to go on a cattle boat. Luke could not say no so he went and signed up. Luke knew this was a lifetime oppertunity.\n\nAfter the world war two was over they went and helped rebuild some places after a big war. One of the places he was going to was Europe. They hgot their seamans papers and boarded the SS Charles. They left with three-hundred fifty-five horses and enough hay and oats to feed them.\n\nThe cattle boat trips were unbeliveable for a small town boy luke said. These cattle boat trips were and oppertunity for a boy like luke himself. It took two weeks to cross the Atlantic Ocean from the eastern of the United States and a month to get to china. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Families all over the world use cars on a daily basis. Cars help us get to places faster and in a more convinient way. Using cars eventually comes to a point were the enviroment can no longer take much of the diesel fuel, therefore car usage should be limited because its releases toxic gas to the enviroment, more excercise would be done, and more bicycles would be put to use. Limiting car usage would not only help people, but it would help the enviroment too.\n\nFirst of all, toxic gas is released into the enviroment due to the burning fuels released by the exhaust pipe in a car. According to Robert Duffer, \"paris typically has more smog than other European capitals...[last] week Paris had 147 micrograms of particulate matter (pm) per cubic meter compared with 114 in Brussels and 79.7 in london, Reuters found\" this shows how cars produce so much smog it harms the human beings lungs when inhaled(source 2). Also as stated by Elisabeth Rosenthal, \"passenger cars are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emission in Europe... and up to 50 percent in some car-intensive areas in the United States\"(souce 1). This represents how much burned diesel gas we are brething in instead of oxygen. There is a 1 in 2 chance that you will breathe in diesel fuels instead of oxygen, in the areas of high concentrated cars.\n\nTherefore, more excercise would be done by people who limit their car time. Scince more bikes would be used the entire body is in motion ion other to get from one destination to another. Usage of bikes would also help prevent the leading cause of death in America, obessity. \"New York's new bike-sharing program and its skyrocketing bridge and tunnel tolls reflect those new priorities, as do a proliferation of car-sharing programs across the nation\" these new inventions keep the United States busy and keep them from using cars, a busy city such a New York, would benefit more from the usage of bikes, trains, skateboards and skates because if not it could end up like Paris, a city full of smog(source 4). Bicycles are a great way to get around easily, \"parks and sports centers also have bloomed throughout the city; uneven, pitted sidewaalks have been replaced by broad, smooth sidewalks; rush-hour restrictions have dramatically cut traffic; and new restaurants and upscale shopping districs have cropped out\", this excerpt explains how society has improved the conditions for bicyclist and skaters. The fixing of sidewalks helps bikers stay on a safe and smooth path to their destination. The excercises produced will help the body stay in shape and healthy.\n\nTo conclude, limiting car usage is something all people should be aware of. If we limit car usage, the enviroment would not be as harmed by burned fuels, people would excercise more, be more active and stay healthy, and finally more bikes would be put into a good use. Limiting car usage is a great idea and would bring more reasources and needed thinbgs to the community. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "A wide range of people make conspiracy theories based off of tv and maagazines. Most of their theories are false due to lack of research. A lot of people make conspiracy theories, and a lot of people come to believe they are true and they start making false accusations against the government not revealing discoveries to the public.\n\nA global surveyor orbiting Mars captured an image of a face like figure on the surface of mars, NASA thought it was a mesa. It turned out to be a rock that had formed on the surface of mars.\n\nNASA revealed the image to the public, The image caused an outbreak of conspiracy theories. There were a lot of debates on whether NASA was hiding something from the public or if they were being truthful. The majority of the public thought that NASA was hiding the truth, and they thought that the face was the result of foreign life forms.\n\nMars surface can form rocks and a vast majority of things that can be spotted on Earth. The rock formed ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "There are alot of ways we can get to one place to another and by using drivers but using a driveless car can be dangerous. It can be dangerous because the technology can fail and people could get hurt. Television and movies have long been fascinated with cars that could drive themselves.\n\nIn reality google has had cars that could drive independently under specific conditions since 2009. their cars hae driven more than half a million miles with out a crash. but so far google cars arent truly driverless they still alert the driver to take over when pulling in and out of driveways or dealing with complicated traffic issues, such as navigating through roadworker accidents.\n\nSensors are nothing new, of course. in the 1900's automakers used speed senors at the wheels in the creation of antilockbrakes. within 10 years, those sensors had become more advanced to detect and resopond to the danger of out- of-control skids or rollovers. The information from the snsntors can cause the car to apply brakes on individ wheels and reduce power from the engine allowing far better resoponse and control than a human driver could manage alone.\n\nFurther improvements in sensors and computer hardware and software to make driving safer are also leading to cars that can handle more and more driving taks on their own. In 2013, BMW announced the development of traffic jam assistant. the car can handle driving fuctions at speeds up to 25 mph, but special touch sensors make sure the driver keeps hold of the wheel.\n\nIn fact none of the cars developed so far are completely driverless. They can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves, but all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills, such as navigating through work zones and around accidents, this means the human driver need to remain alert and be ready if something serious happens.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I would tell them its just a natural landform and, its no aliens there must have been a degree surprise among mission we phototgraphed the face as soon as we could get a good shot at it. Thousands of anxious web surfers were waiting when the image first appeared on a JPL revealing a natural landform there was no alien monument after all. Not everybody was satisified but it was the truth after all the the research all the the pictures. It was not true but mission controllers prepared to look again it was hard work. They still kept saying lets prepare to look again Mars Global Surveyor its a mapping they says its a mapping spacecraft that normally look straight down and scans the planet like a fax machine thats why people still think aliens are true on Mars. We was on are second look the Maliens team captured an extraordinary photo using the camera's absolute maximum resolution.\n\nAlthough a few scientists believed the Face was an alien artifact photographing Cydonia became a priority for NASA when Mars Global surveyors arrived at the Red Planet in Sept.1997. That was the first time when Mars Global Surveyor flew over Cydonia to tell them aliens are not real.\n\nThey say the Face on Mars has since become a pop icon it has starred in a hollywood film, it even haunted grocery store checkout lines 25 years ago. We have evidence Michael Malin and his Mars Orbiter Camera team snapped a picture ten times sharper than the original Viking photos we done The situation is done aliens are not real and it will never be its a landform we had Mars Global Surveyor fly over to Cydonia to tell us the truth.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "What is that thing on Mars?\n\nWell, some people believe that it was something made by aliens. I am here to prove that it was not.\n\nThe thing on Mars first was photographed in 1976. It is a huge rock formation that resembles a human face. There are shadows that give it the illusion that it has eyes, a nose, and a mouth. Some believe that it is real evidence that there is life on Mars, well it is not. On April 5, 1998, the Mars Global Surveyor flew over the \"Face.\" The new cameras snapped a photograph that was ten times sharper than the original one. The new image revealed that it was a natural landform. Some skeptics said that maybe the alien markings were hidden by the clouds, but in 2001 a newer image was taken. This image was captured on a cloudless day, so there was nothing obstructing the view. This image also shows that the presumed face was a landform, and not the ancient work of aliens.\n\nSo, in conclusion, the famous face on Mars was a natural landform. This is supported by the pictures taken in 1998 and 2001. The image captured in 2001 could also possibly see other objects if there were any. So, the face not a sign of life on Mars.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "electoral college is a process not a place. the Electoral college work on the selection of the electors where they vote for president and vice president couting each voter by congress. large populations in states lose by virtue in the mal-apportionment in Senate decreed in the Constitution. popular votes were mostly in florida but in the year 2012 when obama was just beginning to be president, he got 29 eectoral votes it was a success in the same margin in wyoming would net the winner only 3 electoral votes. other things being the same alot of large states get more attention from the presidential candidates in a campaign than some small states do. the electoral college is supossed to be a procces for the electors to vote for president and vice president and every 4 years theres gonna be someone new thats facing the president to be voted for the new president of the united states but when the electors come and vote if the president will still stay the president then he,ll become it for another 4 years but if the guy facing his way to be our new president mr. obama will have to stay as vice president. in columbia the district is allocated 3 electors and something like a state for purposes because of the electoral college. the reason in the following discussion the word \"state\" is also refered as the district of columbia. each person who is running for president your state has his or her own group of electors they are generally chosen to the candidates political party but the state laws vary on how there electors get selected on what there ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In this article the author doesn't support his idea very well of Venus being a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents. He talks about how most people being sent to venus dont return, in addition the atmosphere is very dangers for humans, and they dont even have the technolgy yet to make it a safe trip. All of those topics will be discussed in the following paragraphs explaining why the evidence the author has does not support his claim.\n\nThe first reason why the authors evidence to his claim wasnt very good was because he started off his article talking about the spacecraft that haven't returned from their mission to Venus. For example in paragraph 2 the author says \" humans have sent numerous spacecraft to land on this cloud-draped world. Each previous mission was unmanned, and for good reason, since no space craft survived the landing for more than a few hours.\" The author is telling us straight forward that it is NOT safe to travel to this planet and you may not even come back and then he goes on to saying \" Maybe this issue explains why not a single spaceship has touched down on venus in more than three decades.\". This only tells the readers that scientist aren't even comfortable with sending people anymore because of the failed attempts they have had in the past. Lastly the author says \" Numerous factors contribute to Venus's reputation as a challenging planet for humans to study, despite its proximity to us.\". This sentence backs everything up making it clear that humans arent returning because we arent equipped or ready to deal with these \"factors\". Which brings us right into our next point.\n\nThe next thing that made the author lack while trying to support his claim is when he talked about all the dangers thier were for humans. In paragraph 3 the author states \"On the planets surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet.\". The conditions on this planet are almost impossible for people to live in which is probably why most dont make it back. The author then says \" Also noteable, Venus has the hottest surface temprature of any planet in our solar system\". This is a big point because it seems like small information that didnt need to be added but, really it's big because they wouldn't have put it in there if it wasn't something that raised some concern. Lastly the author says \" Beyond high pressure and heat, Venusian geology and weather present additional impediments like erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequent lightning strikes toprobes seeking to land on its surface.\". This goes right into our last paragraph because if they dont have the right technology to help and keep the people traveling to this planet safe then they won't make it back.\n\nThe last thing that leads me to believe that the authors evidence wasn't very good was the way he talked about the lack of technology. For example in the in the fifth paragraph, the author says \" but the air pressure would be close to that of sea level on earth. Solar power would be plentiful and radiation would not exceed Earth levels. Not easy conditions, but survivable for humans.\". He also states \" More importantly, researchers cannot take samples of rock, gas, or anything else from a distance. Therefore, scientist seeking to conduct a thorough mission to understand Venus would need to get close and personal despite the risks.\". These two sentences could not be more blunt on the fact that we just do no have the technology at the moment to get everything we want, and to keep everything safe.\n\nThroughout the article the authors claim was not supported very well by evidence. there were to mant things that came into play cause it to not be safe nor get what they needed. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Challenge of Exploring\n\nIn the article of \"The Challenge of Expoling\", Venus is also called (Evening Star). Evening Star is actually one of the brightest points of light in the night sky. Venus is a planet in the solar system. While Venus is easy to look at from distant, but it's a challenge place to examine more closley. A little bit of facts, is that Earth and Venus are twins, meaning that Earth and Venus have similar things. Earth and Venus have in terms of density, size, and occasionally closest in distance to Earth.\n\nMars is also closely to Earth. Mars and Venus orbit the sun at different sppeds. Sence Venus is right around the corner, the humans have sent numerous spacecraft to land in this cloud draped world. Venus hasen't been touched in tree decaseds, becuase no spacecraft survived the landing for more then a few hours, that's why a spaceship hasen't touched down Venus. Which makes humans, harder to study Venus. 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets Venus, which is more challenging are the clouds of how highy corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere. Planet's surface temperatures average over 800 degrees, and atmosperic pressure is 90 times better than what was experience on Earth.\n\nVenus has the hottest surface temperatuure of any planet in the solar system. Mercury is closer to the sun, which means high pressure, heat, venusian geology and weather. Also meaning erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequent lighting strikes. In paragraph four it's asking a question, \"if our sister plaent is so inhospitable, why are scientists even discssing furter visits to it's surface?\" Earth is like a planet in our solar system. Venus covered larger with oceans and could have supported various froms of life, also just like earth. Venus can be sometimes be the nearest option for a planetary visit. Venus from a ship orbiting or hovering safely far above the planet can provide, becuase most froms of light can not penetrate the dense atmosphere. Nasa is working on other approaches to studying Venus. Venus is also becoming human curiosity will lead to many equally intimidating endeavors. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Google has made cars that could drive themselves since 2009, but these cars can only in specific conditions. They cars still need a drive to take over when pulling in and out of driveways and traffic issues. So what's the point of driverless cars if the car itself is not driverless?\n\nThe development of driverless cars should not continue. Sure, they do seem really cool, and the world does have the technology to manufacture these cars, but they aren't worth the money. Driverless cars use many sensors and computers. They need multiple sensors to see in order for the car to drive in the streets. Without the sensors, the car wouldn't be able to see where it is going, and if one of the sensors break or has a glitch, this can lead to many problems and cause accidents that can result in death of pedestrians or the passengers in the car. Another reason why these cars should not be developed is it is a waste of money. These cars still require the driver to take over the car when there is something on the road the car can not handle, such as navigating through work zones and around accidents. Although this is not the same as regular driving, the driver is still assisting the car, and that is not completely driverless. This means the driver has to pay attention to the road as if he or she was driving. It is true that these cars are computers, and computers are supposedly smarter than humans, but they don't have human instincts. Therefore, driverless cars are not safe.\n\nIn order for driverless cars to exist, the cars should be 100% driverless, meaning no human assistance, but they are not. Even though manufaturers can improve on the technology to make them 100% driverless, the cars are not worth the money. The cars contain many sensors and computers, and these sensors and computers cost a lot of money. Also, because these cars require human assistance in certain conditions, there is no point of having them because it is similar to the cars that are available to the world today.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Face that you had seen in 1976 is simply a natural land formation. The picture its self is quite old as well and the camera must not be as modern as the ones we used in 2001. When we took a much clearer picture of the mesa, it showed that it was just a normal mesa with some parts abit higher than others which made it look like a face because of the shadows. The suns angle of its sun rays made it look like a face but its is just a coinsidence.\n\nAll these theorists lack knowledge of natural landforms because all they want to do is stir up the people to make them believe this was work of aliens. All these movies and articles on magazines and radio talk is just to get more attention to the Face.\n\nAlthough it would be extraordinary if there was ancient life on Mars. If there was we would have been able to see any ships or building made from aliens on Mars in the picture but there wawsn't because we took a perfect picture on a cloudless summer day. We saw no such things near the face because it is simply a mesa landform. The picture we took was 1.56 meters per pixel when the picture taken in 1976 was 43 meters per pixel, meaning that anything small that you might think is a building we would have seen it clearer and it might just have been a big boulder or hill.\n\nThere for all of your conspiracy theories about aliens roaming the surface of Mars is wrong because the Face was not created by any aliens. People need to understand it is just a mesa land formation that had shadows that looked like a face caused by hills on the mesa and the suns rays hitting it at an angle. If you don't belive me fine, we have proof of it not being aliens, the new picture tells it all.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Luke was a young adult who just graduated from high school and became a Seagoing Cowboy with his friend Don Reist. (Yeeha) Being a cowboy must be exciting for him I imagine. After World War II was over, many countries were in ruins. 44 nations picked in to help the countries and they needed Seagoing cowboys to help the animals that were stuck in sea, so Luke and Don signed up to help.\n\nThey found a bunch of horses first with a number of 335 horses and enough hay and oats to feed them. Luke made nine trips which was the most of any Seagoing Cowboy. \"The cattle-boat trips were an unbelievable opportunity for a small-town,\" Luke says. He toured an excavated castle in Crete and marveled at the Panama canal on his way to china.\n\nIt took a month to get to China, but they finally got there. Caring for the animals they rescued kept Luke busy. It was more than an adventure for Luke. It opened the world to him.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Many people use cars to get from one place to another,but however, many states around the world are having people not using cars. In other words, many states are car free states and this has changed many cultural changes in the sociey that the people live in. Not using any cars provides many beneficial factors to not only the enviroment but to the people too and here's why. Having car-free states reduces car emission and can provide healthier productive lives of exercise. This change to the world can inspire lots of people and open up the doors of nature's beauty to provide a peaceful way of living to the enviroment of the world.\n\nWe use cars everyday in our lives from going to resteraunts, jobs, homes, schools,ect. However, do we ever think that whenever we drive we are causing more pollution to spread from every mile we go? Cars are the number one leading pollution emission enviroment destroyers in the world. This pollution causes many close suburban areas with homes around to breathe in gas emission from cars. This is absolutely not healthy at all to many people. For example, in the article written by Robert Duffer in his title, \"Paris bans driving due to smog.\" States that, \"[Last] week Paris had 147 micrograms of particular matter (PM) per cubic meter...\" That is more toxin to inhale that could possibly kill you! There are countries, for instance, like Germany that have some cities \"car-free\" as an experimental way to stop pollution emission and traffic jams causing loud noises to some close spaced suburban areas. Now, instead of using cars the people living in Germany are walking, riding bikes, or using trams to get from one place to another. So far, the people do not mind having any cars around and they even say they are happy and like the new change on where they live. \"When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way,\" says Heidrun Walter from the article by Elisabeth Rosenthal titled, \"Suburb, Life Goes On Without Cars.\" So whenever you first sit in a car think about what you are about to do and think about how you can benefit yourself and the world by not spreading pollution emission from cars.\n\nMany people want to exercise, stay fit, and lose weight depending on what they want to do. Some people like to jog or run to go to there jobs as a productive way to not use there cars but to get out and exercise more. Many people around the world perfer not to use cars but instead use any-other means of transportation to either make themselves healthy or to not use any means of spreading pollution. In fact many people that live in big cities such as New York and San Francisco with more cars driving in the population. Have young people from 16-39 year olds that don't have a drivers license use other means of transportation to benefit themselves. In the article written by Elisabeth Rosenthal titled, \"The End of Car Culture.\" States that, \"They organize their summer jobs and social life around where they can walk or take public transportation or car-pool with friends.\" People ages from 16-39 year olds are not caring about using cars or getting a drivers license but using any other means of transportation even if it is longer way to get to a destination. This is very beneficial for young people of 16-39 year olds to have healthy lives at a young age so they can live longer and they can feel good about themselves.\n\nCan you see now why having no cars as the means of transportation is a good thing? Many people are having healthier lives and live on not using pollution but using other means of transportation. People in many states and countries are happy with this change for the better as new meaning of change in cultural experiences. Now, are you able to change just like the people living the \"car-free\" life around the world? ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Society has made the car industry accelerate rapidly and over the years the amount of money these automobile company's make only increases. However, its time to look into the advantages of limiting such car usage in our communities. Studies have shown that the use of cars only increases the amonunt of stress we have. Without the usage of cars we're able to release such stressors Carlos Arturo Plaza stated in Andrew Selsky's article \"Car-free day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota\". Its one thing to make the decision to start this movement on our own, but when a community becomes involved it makes a stronger impact. Car usage in America has only grown since it began however, the amount of cars being bought is beginning to show decrease. Many people are realizing that there are numerous amounts of ways to get around their city. Some are even carpooling. Although choosing other options such as the bus may take time it is still well worth the wait. We will find that many other options and opportunities come into play when we cut down on and get rid of the use of cars in our communities.\n\nVarious factors come into play when it comes to world pollution. One of the factors being the use of automobiles which increases the amount of air pollution thus damaging the ozone layer. The use of cars is second nature to us. We love the sense of indepence we get at the age of 16 when we can finally get our license. To point out, no one thinks on whats happening as we purchase cars. Instead, we rely on diesel gas to do the trick. Imagine cutting out the use of cars. With this detuction of car usage the amount of destruction done to the ozone layer will diminish tremendously. We will be able to experience clearer air just like the communities that participate in this action. For instance, in an article done by Robert Duffer titled \"Paris bans driving due to smog\" we can witness through testimony the wonders done by banning car usage. Normally Paris has high amounts of pollution but in order to change this the city enforced a partial driving ban to clear the air temporarily. The fact that the city had cold nights and warm days doesn't do anything to help because these nights and days only allow for the warmer layer of air to trap car emissions. After the banning of car usage Paris was finally able to experience clear air. \"Paris typically has more smog than other European capitals... Last week Paris had 147 ,micrograms of particulate matter (PM) per cubic meter compared with the 114 in Brussels and 79.7 in London... \" (excerpt from source 2 \"Paris bans driving due to smog\").\n\nTo be clear, no one's against car usage, but after considering the costs of using cars you'd realize its not worth it. Residents of Vanban, Germany find this statement to be true and have therefore regulated their lives around it. Elizabeth Rosenthal created an article on the residents from Germany titled \"In German Suburb, Life Goesn On Without Cars\". Here she discussed what the community has done in their no car movement. Residents here do not regret their decision to get rid of their cars and actually like it better than dealing with the uncontrollable and frustrating traffic jams. Not to mention the countless amount of car wrecks that come along with it. In this particular part of Germany the government has assisted in the movement. There are no street parking spots, driveways or home garages. Some might think its absurd but when theres no cars theres no need for such things. They have even improved sidewalks and made the city commute friendly with stores only a walk distance away. A mother from Germany gives her account of living in Vauban and states the following: \"When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way\" She is a media trainer and a mother of two. In previous bills, 80 percent of the money from the government had gone to highways and 20 percent to other transports, but with the smart planning movement that will change within the next 6 years.\n\nAll in all, many factors come into play when discussing transportation within a city. However with the deduction of car use a city can recieve many benefits including an increase in money for other government spending, clearer air, happiness, more money in their pockets among many other things. We just have to decide whether enough is enough. The facts have proven themselves worth it for many other countries, why can't it be successful for us as well? ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Since I turned fifteen all I could remember dreaming of was my sixteenth birthday and getting a license, like most normal teenage girls. I just couldn't hold back on the feeling I got just thinking about a car and that freedom I would finally have as a licensed driver. That's when my mom decided how important it was to take care of the planet, and how I should dedicate my time to making this planet all the more greener. I've always been interested in the environment so I though about all the ways I could stay green...with a car that is. What most people don't understand however is the amount of pollution we have in our planet today and how we can do few simple things to avoid it, that's right girls, stop worrying so much about the car and focus more on how you could limit car usage and the advantages of doing so such as avoiding more polution, walking which can actually help you health wise and maybe even saving money on gas; a little green for green.\n\nThe amount of polution we have here in dear mother earth is just astonishing. Take Paris for example which happens to have more smog than any other European capital. This kind of polution isn't only bad for the environment however, it also affects us as individuals, polution can not only intoxicate our planet but us as well. Rather than spending a life time figuring out solutions and filling our bodies up with medication we should just be avoiding the problem once and for all, kill it at its source. Avoid using so much car travel that at the end of the day, a bus can take you to the same place and best of all, it comes guilt free.\n\nAdding to the whole idea of a healthy lifestyle and environment, try walking, which by the way also prevents car usage and so kills two birds with one stone. If you drop the keys and pick up a pair of running shoes your helping to save the envoironment and at the same time guaranteeing a longer life for yourself. Take Bogota, Colombia for instance and its brilliant idea of Car-free day. Yes, it's exactly as it sounds; a whole day dedicated to reducing car usage, and although they still allow buses and taxis on the streets, regualr every day use cars are 100% banned. Whats the point of this you may ask? Well, it all must begin somewhere, one action creates a chain reaction.\n\nOne of an average persons problems here in America involve financial issues, especially now with the economy we have, gas prices aren't the same. How can you avoid a situation like this that may even help you cut down on your daily budget? How about taking other methods of transportation for a change? This way you save extra money for other necessities and at the same time, help clean out our environment by changing up your daily car trips here and there. Although it may not seem like much, a little bit of something can make a huge difference.\n\nAll in all, I believe it is important for everyone to undestand how essential it is that we put some thought into our world, especially those eager to drive. Just take a minute out of your eveyday busy schedules and find ways to reduce reuse and recycle to make our world even better for our future generations. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Psychology may be a ball of fun depending on how you feel about it involved in technology.\n\nAt the University of Illinois a Hypothesis including a algorithm that involves facial reconognition to decode emotion this Prof. Huang, (Who is a professor at the Institute) who works along side Prof. Nicu Sebe of the University of Amsterdam.\n\nThis technology can be resourceful in many ways however, it might be used is what can be concerning espeacially when other people might know what your thinking by just emotion alone.\n\nThis Algorithm that can is used by a 3 dimensional model of a face with all the primary facial muscles just how this technology can be evolved and used for more advanced inventions that could either help or be weary of.\n\nEmotion algorithms can be used in daily life to help teach kids because the device would know when the student is bored or just lacking understanding.\n\nWith the help of psychologists espeacially Dr. Eckman who created the \"FACS (Facial Action Coding System)\" the system classifies the emotions within several genres compared to the facial gestures.\n\nThe researchers must have had to calculate the emotion, like how your mother knows your sick, oh she just calculated, pondered a little. These algorithms used for students and kids will be technologically fundamental espeacially for kids who have hard times paying attention, yet the price of these tools could be a jaw dropper and how might this work with kids who have facial scars or disorders that involve causing problems with the algorithm.\n\nThe algorithms invented will surely leave an impact on society and following education of students everyone of them being able to learn in a fair environment. The software in Dr. Huang's algorithms are similar to the \"Da Vinci Code\" that stores anatomical information. these scientific advancements will hopefully drive us into a newer age where technology is more effective at security, daily life, and ensuring it'll keep privacy and boundaries at some priority. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Cars today are driving closer and to being able to drive on their own. This can change the way people live and how people use tranportation in a positive way. Even though they aren't entirely \"driverless\" and still need a driver it's still a step in that direction. Driverless cars would take over public transportion system, create less accidents, and help people who can't drive well.\n\nDriverless cars are esstientally going to be the future public transportation. The cars will end up taking the postions of taxis and even buses. Google cofounder Sergey Brin envisons a future where these cars will offer much more flexiblity while cutting the useage of fuel by half.\n\nThese self drivng cars will also be safer for others on the road reducing the chances of a crash. Car companies have taken extreme precautions with these machines fitting them with senors all over the cars. Google has taken the idea into its own hands with some companies like Toyota. They've modified a Toyota Prius and have outfitted it with a postiton-estimating sensor on the left rear wheel, a rotating sensor on the roof, a video camera mounted ner the review mirror, four automotive radar sensors, a GPS reciever, and an inertial motion sensor. These sensors will apply brakes and reduce power from the engine so that the driver at hand can take over.\n\nOf course these driverless cars will need a passenger that a operate the car in case of an emergancy. In 2013, BMW announced a development of the \"traffic Jam Assistant\", which allows the cars to handle driving functions at speed up to 25 mph. Special touch sensors make sure a driver is keeping hold of the wheel at all times. They can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves but still need to notify the driver when it need human skills navigating through areas like work zones.\n\nOn the other hand, some people wouldn't lay their lives in the hands of a self driving car. Driving laws today focus on keeping the drivers, passengers and pefestrians safe. Today, traffic laws are written with the thought of a human driver controlling the car. In most states, it has been illegal to to even test driverless car; but scientist beileve that more states will allow testing after seeing results from those states that have been doing it already.\n\nThis future of self driving cars is near. Automakers like Telsa have projected a 2016 release for a car capable of driving by it self 90% of the time. Other companies like Mercedes- Benz , Audi and Nissan have plans to release cars that drive by themselves by 2020. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.