Split (2)

train · 5.42k rows

messages listlengths 3 3
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Some people may think that driverless cars would amazing, but i think thats taking a big risk. Safety should be number one when it comes to driving and when your on the road with a driverless car that could be really unsafe. Techology is advancng but i still dont think people today can find a way to make a car a hundred percent driverless. There would be many conflicts that come with driverless cars.\n\nWhen your on the road your safety should come first. Any thing could go wrong with the sensors or other technology while its on the road and then there will be a accident. Lawmakers know that safety is best achieved with alert drivers. What if someone was to hit the car and total it but then leaves how will they know who did it and what to do about it. Laws shouldnt have to be changed for a car.\n\nHaving a driverless car on the road could stir up some problems. when someone gets in a accident with the car how will they know who's fault it is? The owner of the driverless car and the owner of the other car may even get into an argument all for nothing if you ask me. To be on the safe side i think we should just stick with the regular cars today.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Some peope think that the landform was created by alien's, but have no evidence. You can clearly see in the picture that theres a shadow on the landform. People have even proved that it was a shadow on the landform. You can also conclude that there are no alien's roaming around in space making face's on landform's.\n\nPeople have no evidence that there are alien's roaming around in space. Alien's are only in the movie's that you see, that's only my opinion though. Even if there were alien's out there, we should have found them by now. With all our space gadget's that we have that can look deep into space, i'm pretty sure we would have found alien's by now.\n\nEven though people have \"spotted\" alien UFO's, they have no proof. People could have said they even spotted it, but then again since their on video, they could have photoshopped it. People can believe what they want to believe, but if you can see there's perfect evidence, you can't really argue if they have real proof.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "1\n\nThe autor suggest that studying venus is a worthy pursuit despite the danger it represent. Venus is one of earth's neighbor. Also, Venus is the closest planet to earth in terms of density and size, and occasionallythe closest in distance too. Humans have sent numerous spacecraft to land n this clud-draed world.\n\nThe author explains that not a single spaceship has touched down on Venus in more then Three decades.\n\n2\n\nEven tho studying Venus represents alot of danger the author says it is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers. There are alot of dangers that Venus has for example, in the article it says Venus has a thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets Venus. Also, Venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system. Even tho Venus has alot of dangers astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system.\n\nIf scientiest study Venus they will discover new and worthy information. NASA is working on other approvhes to study Venus.\n\n3\n\nThe article supports my claim. It states that even tho studying Venus is a danger scientist are working hard to be abe to go. NASA are woring on some electronics that they could use and will last for three weeks and any conditions.\n\nIn fact it is a big challenge to everybody. The author states that \" our travels on earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation.\n\n4\n\nIn conclution to the author, he suggest that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents.\n\nStudying venus could represent alot of dangers but scientist and the NASA are working on getting everything set up. the author says\" our travels on earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doughts \" that means that if we want to do something or be anobody in life we should not stop because there are dangers or doubts but they should be expand to discover new things.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear state senator of Florida,\n\nI'm sending you this letter for one purpose only, to convince you with strong defensive facts the electoral college is unfair, outdated, irrational and should be replaced with the popular vote. Let's begin with the simple fact that we, the common people of the United States of America, land of the free, don't even have the right to directly vote for a human being that is to be running our country for the next 4 years, possibly 8. Instead, we are voting for electors in the same political party as the candidate we wish for? Actually no, we don't even obtain that right because as stated in source 1 electors sometimes aren't even chosen by politcal party considering \"state laws vary on how electors are selected and what their responsibilities are...\"\n\nIn source 2 it states that an elector can be anyone not holding a public office. The elector chosen is a complete stranger to more than half of the population of the state yet we are expected to trust that this person will live up to his or her word that he/she will vote for the president we want to be running this country when we have absolutely no control over their actions election day. Trust isn't easily given especially when there are no laws given that the elector must only vote from the candidate majorly favored in that particular state. So lets see the elector that we vote for, which in some cases people even get confused and vote for the elector of opposing team, can walk in election day, decieve all the people from his/her state and walk out with absolutely no penalty.\n\nIn source 3 it later states that \"voters in toss-up states are more likely to pay attenten to the campaign knowing that they are going to decide the election\" but what about the swing states? Because the winner-take-all system candidates don't even go to those states knowing that they'll most likely lose. Does that seem fair to you? That basically means that winner candidate could be the same man/woman that couldn't careless if their votes were on them or not.\n\nFurthermore, in source 3 it explains how the electoral vote is the only way to ensure a certain outcome but as said in source 2, a tie may seem unlikely but highly possible. So let's say there is a tie, the winning decision then passes down to the House of Representatives. Here the state delegations cast one vote for the candidate they wish for but in the light of truth it is impossible for one representative of millions of people to be able to reflect on what the people want. So now what? Not only is plan A, the electors, totally bogus but plan B,which is the house representatives, completely takes our right to chose the citizen we want to represent the United States.\n\nI hope you read my letter and come to realization that the electoral college is basically just a dirty method that's taking the rights of the common people. If it keeps on there will be one election year where more than half the population will open their eyes to fact that they don't even have a say in who they want to be running this country and simply not vote, then where will that lead us? Dictatorship? Rebellion? Popular vote is the way to go. It for one allows citizens to be apart of descision making in who should be president which later on abolishes the whole dispute over \"swing states\" and \"toss-up states\" because candidates will have to work twice as hard to earn their seat in the big house. Candidates will have to visit each state, anwser necessary questions from the citizen, compaign harder and at the end of the day a hard-working candidate will become a hard-working president who will lead our country to prosperity.\n\nSincerely, a concerned citizen ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "So many planets to choose from. Have you ever wondered what it would be like to visit one? What about living there? Me too! The planet Venus could possibly be our next home. It has said that Venus still has Earth like feautures, Samples can be removed from the planet and with improvement of the rovers and other crafts they could gather more information to make living there possible. In the article the author suggests that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents, and in this essay I will go further into depth about how that is a true.\n\nAstronomers are so fascinated with the with the planet Venus, considering that the planet possibly could have been the most Earth-like planet in the solar system. According the article it states that,\" Long ago, Venus was porbably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth. Today, Venus still has some features that are analogous to those on Earth. The planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar feautures such as valleys, mountains, and craters. Furthermore, recall that Venus can sometimes be our nearest option for a planetary visit.\" This shows that Venus could have possibly been just like earth years ago , but still has those same Earth traits left behind. These left over sources can make for surviving on the planet.\n\nNASA has also come up with a possible solution for sending human life to the Earth-like planet with out being in danger. According to the article it states that,\" Imagine a blimp-like vehicle hovering 30 or so miles above rolling Venusian landscape. Just as our jet airplanes travel at a higher altitude to fly over many storms, a vehicle hovering over Venus would avoid the unfriendly ground conditions by staying up and out of their way. At thirty-plus miles above the surface, temperatures would still be toasty at around 170 degrees Farenheit, but the air pressure would be close to that of sea level on Earth. Solar power would be plentiful, and radiation would not exceed Earth levels. Not easy condtions, but survivable for humans.\" This shows that NASA is trying to create a reinovation that could help humans survive the hostile conditions of Venus.\n\nMany researchers are working on innovations that would allow the machines to last long enough to gather sources from Venus. According to the article it states that, \"Some simplified electronicas made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating the chaos of Venus's surface and have lasted for three weeks in such conditions. Another project is looking to an old technology called mechanical computers. These devices were first divisioned in the 1800's and played an important role in the 1940's during World War II. The thought of computers existing in those days may sound shocking, but these devices make calculations by using gears and levers and do not require electronics at all. Modern computers are enormously powerful, flexible, and quick but tend to be more delicate when it comes to extreme physical condtions. Just imagine exposing a cell phone or tablet to acid or heat capable of melting tin.\n\nBy comparison systems that use mechanical parts can be made more resistant to pressure, heat, and other forces.\" This shows that researchers are searching for a stronger metal or material that can widthstand the pressure and heat of Venus when landing , so that they can gather information.\n\nIn conclusion the authors suggestion that \"Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers is presents\" is evaluated thoroughout the article by him explaining that Venus could have been just like Earth decades ago and it still has those same Earth traits, there could be a possible solution for humans to fly over Venus while being able to survive the critical conditions of the planet, and making it clear that researchers are searching for a new material that could widthstand the extreme conditions. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In this artice the author discusses the obstacles that we face when we try to explore Venus and why we should explore Venus. At the end the author states \"Striving to meet the challenge presented by Venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiousity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors.\" He does a very god job of supporting his idea by building his case using knowledge about the challenges of exploring Venus, and then he uses that knowledge to show us advancements that are helping us face those challenges.\n\nThe author uses the first two paragraphs to introduce us to the planet Venus with facts that seem unnecessary, but help develop a sense of what the planet Venus is like. The author does this by using facts such as \"Venus, sometimes called the \"evening star,\" is one of the brightest points of light in the night sky, making it simple for even an amateur stargazer to spot it.\" In that sentence, he showed us that the planet Venus is bright which he later uses in one of his points that are used to justify why exploring Venus is a worthy pursuit.\n\nIn third paragraph he then discusses the challenges of inhabiting Venus. The author tells us that \"Venus has the hotest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system,\", \"the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet\", and \" Venusian geology and weather present additional impedements like erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequent lightning strikes to probes seeking to land on its surface.\" These challenges are used in later parts of the article to show how scientists today are trying overcome these challenges using modern technology.\n\nNow that the author has set himself up to be able to support his thesis of why it is a good idea to explore Venus using scientific evidence. The author states \"Striving to meet the challenge presented by Venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiousity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors.\" The challenges and characteristic that he used in the first half of the article are used to show how modern technology has helped us to try and overcome those challenges. When scientists were presented with the challenge of keping objects at the surface of Venus because of the heat. They overcame that by using simplified electronics made of silicon carbide. These electronics were able to withstand Venus like temperatures for up to three weeks. Scientists are also making electronics that are better at withstanding heat, pressure, and ther forces better than electronics right now. These examples show how challenges such as exploring Venus help us as a race to push ourselves and our limitations to be able to survive the harshest conditions that we can meet.\n\nThis article was put together well.The information was organized to first present the reader with the subject, then it would discuss the challenges that we face with the subject, it then showed how we are overcoming the challenges that we face, which finally led into the main point that the author wanted us to understand. The author knew how to organize his article to support his claims well and to let the reader understand what they are reading. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Have you heard of the face on Mars? Many people think that it is a human face, or like an Egytian Pharaoh. Others think that it is a natural landform.\n\nI think that it is a natural landform because scientific facts show that there are no alien life forms that live on Mars. The Face is mostly shadows on the rocks. Even if there were aliens you would think they would have stayed on Mars and we would have gotten a piture of them by now.\n\nThough the Viking 1 had taken the photo and we have inhanced it since then you would still be able to tell if it really was an alien sanctuary. It may look like it but it is most likely a natural landform that had formed when Mars got hit with meteors. In conclusion I think that the Face is a natural landform made by meteors and not by aliens. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The authour suggests that studying Venus is a worth pursit despite the dangers it presents. Even though its dangeruse the author still thinks its a good idea to go and study Venus.\n\nYou can tell the author belives this to be ok evon though its dangerous when he said,\" Human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intemidating eneavors.\" This means that he knows its dangruse but everyone is curuose about what they will find, even if its dangerous he thinks its worth it. The opertunity to find signs of life or rare metals it would prove tempting for some even if it was dangrouse.\n\nIf you continue to read the passage he goes on to talk about how Venus is inhospitable. He then says he still wants to study it by saying, \"Astronomers are facinated by Venus beause it may well once have been the most earth like.\" This means they are trying to see if Venus had life just as earth dose now.\n\nIn conclusion the author thinks the pros of going to Venus out way the cons. Honestly I think he is right my self we could discover so much if only we knew what secrets Venus holds. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" the author tends to switch back and forwardth with two opinions of driverless cars. One that they're a great invention that will help improve traffic and get rid of traffic jams and help make humans more efficent. Then theres the other opinion, that driverless cars are not only unneccesary but also dangerous. Driverless cars are a sought after trend that most millienials will wants on-demand. They're a sign of our vass improvment in technology not only in the car technology world but also in technlogy as a whole. Driverless cars will let drivers take it easy on the road so they don't have to keep pressure on the gas pedal and be on watch for blind spots. As drivers still do need to watch the road just incase of a incident on the road, the driver sits back and enjoys the ride. Though most states think that driverless cars are a horrible idea and think they will create more accidents than they are suppose to relieve us of, they can't deny the mass production that will soon start to happen in the several years ahead of us. Right now they are trying to find ways to regulate and set brand new rules and laws for semiautonomous cars. One that most states do want is that drivers MUST still be aware of the road. What's good a self driving car if it can't serve out of dangers way or know how to drive in work areas. Not only are there big dangers in letting a car drive it self through cameras and give full trust in a computer, but theres also a huge danger in humans not paying attention. As we all know humans can sometimes overlook or not see things such as a car turning from a blind spot or forgetting to check a lane their turning into. So an idea floating around is to a camera watch and monitor a driver while they have their car driving selflessly without any help. That's a huge step in efficent driving, it'd help cut down automobile crash and fatalities but also help make streets a much more safer and quieter area.\n\nNow onto the dangers of owning a self driving car. Self driving cars are a HUGE risk not only for manufactors but for those in the car. One little bug in the cars auto pilot and not only the drivers but other lifes may also be taken. There would have to be a yearly or monthly check up on car maintaince to make sure that no bug or glitch would be in the cars computer. While GM has vibrating seats that help alert the driver when they are close to a dangerous area or googles autonomous voice that tells you when danger is ahead, there is no guarante that the car will be able to get out of dangers way, even with a humans help. Another danger is that drivers may get bored of watching only the road and not having anything else to focus their attention on. So thoughts of in-car entertainment and HUDS(Heads Up Displays) are coming into mind. But this would take distraction to a whole other level. Not only would drivers be way too focused on their in-car entertainment or HUD but they would neglect the road in general. Although in-car entertainment or HUD is forced to shut down when driver control is neccesary but it'd be a huge risk to take due to accidents always being able to happen at any time or any place.\n\nSo overall driverless cars are a cool idea and many millienials will be on the surge to get one. They come at a price and that price may be safety. Unless further development on ways to keep the driver still in contact with the road come under way, there is no way to guarante a accident free environment.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author supports the idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents. He supports this idea by sharing that Venus once has been the most Earth-like planet in the solar system. It expands human knowledge about the planet and enhances technology to be more capable of traveling to Venus.\n\nLong ago, Venus may have been an Earth-like planet. The planet brings danger but this won't stop scientist from disccusing how it may have been a sister planet to Earth. In the text it states \" Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth. Today, Venus still has some features that are analogous to those on earth.\" This indicates that there were very common features about Venus long ago and even now that can relate to earth. The scientist are fascinated by these findings and are willing venture off to Venus and find out more.\n\nGoing to Venus is a tough job and can be quite dangerous. So technology is going to need to be upgraded to be able to fit Venus' harsh temperatures and atmosphere. Enhancing technology is whats going to keep people learning and wanting to improve. With these improvements travel to harsher planet will be easier. The text states \"Imagine a blimp-like vehicle hovering 30 or so miles above the roiling Venusian landscape. Just as our jet airplanes travel at a higher altitude to fly over many storms, a vehicle hovering over Venus would avoid the unfriendly ground conditions by staying up and out the way.\" This indicates technology is being enhanced to be able to withstand the harsh conditions of Venus. Imagination and innovation is being used to expand this knowledge.\n\nHuman knowledge is being expanded when preparing and learning about Venus. Its conditions, what it was like long ago, and technology being improved make people learn and be more fascinated about Venus. When visiting Venus, scientist have found that \"Venus' atmosphere is made up of almost 97 persent carbon dioxide blankets\". That is more knowledge found when going to Venus. Exploring planets besides earth like Venus help people learn about from the dangers they go through to get there which makes it worth it.\n\nAs stated in the claim the author does support the idea that studying Venus is a wothy pursuit despite the dangers it presents. By explaining that Venus and earth were once sister planets and today still do share common characteristics. Human knowledge is expanded when visiting the planet and finding its dangers. Then learning how to overcome with enhacing technology. Which leads them to being able to explore the Venus. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Should driverless cars actually exist? They are some good and bad times about driverless cars. Also some things that are the same and different about the cars and people. Should the cars the driverless cars happen? My thoughts may make you go for or against the idea.\n\nThe good things about the driverless cars is that the cars will drive them selves in a safe speed and the cars would use half as much gas than taxis use, that would good for the enviroment and for the people. The smoke and gas from the cars wont harm the atmosphere or the ozone layer, also effecting the greenhouse effect. This helps humans so they dont have to spend so much money on gas and are able to buy more important things or things they just want. Another good thing is that it'll reduces accidents and drunk driivers.\n\nThe bad things sound worser than good, maybe because they are. The driverless cars would stop accidents caused by people, such as drunk drivers, but the driver would still be drunk or sense he or she doesn't need to drive will drink more and cause problems for their health or family. Of course people get in accidents to avoid things, such as animals, people, or objescts like ice, will the driverless car know how to react? The most the car can do is stop, what good will that do if the car was on ice. People might start thinking they dont need to focus on the task at hand, so they would start texting or eating, something that would distract them and when the car needs your helps and you aren't ready what happens. People might start using thge driverless cars for a worst purpose, such as gangs, the driver can shoot without worrying about driving, crime would go up.\n\nHow would laws change, can people be younger than 16 to drive now, do you need to know how to drive, should you know what signs mean or what lines mean or do. What about texting and driving or drinking and driving, would that be allowed now sense the car drives for it self. Do the passangers have to wear a seat belt. Whose fault would be for an accident, yours or the company of the car. If you would injuired because car turned to early or late, was it the fault of the car or you, what if you hit a person because car turned and didnt see the person to know to stop and kills or injurys that person. Would people or car be the fault of things.\n\nThe driverless car may seem like an amazing or smart idea, it really isn't manying things could go wrong and isn't much benefit but gas. The driverless car seems like a lazy persons way of not driving, or a drunk to drink more, or a teen to text. The risk is high and benifits are low.The driverless car should not be thing till the person is as smart as the car.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "What would the world be like with autonomous cars? Cofounder of Google, Sergey Brin, belives the world would change completely. Television and movies have also been interested in driverless cars for the longest time. Now many manufacturing companies, such as Mercedes, Toyota, and Nissan are investigating this possibly innovative technology. Driverless cars could prove to be a great solution for the environment, driver saftey, and world innovation.\n\nAs Sergey Brin invisions, driverless cars could help the environment immensely. The driverless cars would be much smaller and more flexible than the buses mainly used for public transportation today. These new cars would have the ability to replace this bulkey public transportation. Also, since noone would have the need to buy a car, less cars would be on the road. This would cut down on the fuel used today by half since there are not as many cars. With less overall cars on the road there will not be as much greenhouses gases\n\nreleased into the air, conserving the ozone layer and help correct global warming.\n\nNot only would driverless cars provide helpful to the environment but also to driver saftey. Most traffic laws focus on the necessity for driver, passenger, and pedestrian saftey. With the driverless cars that have spinning sensors on the roof, named LIDAR, the car would be able to detect pedestrians more quickly than a intoxicated, distracted, or drowsey driver. The cars would alert the driver, if a saftey issue it could not deal with arose. This would keep pedestrians safe and possibly prevent many crashes caused by human errors at the wheel.\n\nDriverless cars could also help by being a world innovation. Since the human race is so curious and determined, if a world innovation of driverless cars occured, it could prompt anyone to make the next \"Big Thing.\" It has already brought major compaines like Google, Benz, Nissan, Mercedes, and Telsa into a phase of competition to create the fully capable driverless cars. Also on the way to this new invention, some company might stumble across a another world innovative idea. The invention of these driverless cars might help in uniting the world for one purpose as well as continuing the human goal to always improve.\n\nDriverless cars are a very new idea. With so many people working on this world innovation, it could possible be the next \"Big Thing\" only to lead on to more improvement in human technology. These driverless cars also provide an alternative option to decreasing the greenhouse gases in the environment by eliminating the need for so many cars on the road. Saftey would also be improved with the creation of driverless cars so people who are impaired by alcohol, drowsiness, or emotions, would not cause as many crashes. Allowing the creation of driverless cars has so many benefits for the environment and saftey the world will be changed forever, for the better.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I disagree with everything this passage has to say.Cars are suppose to hold responability, but if we have cars that drive on their own there will be no more responability!\n\nThink about it, You wont have to worry about having your turn singals on, turning into lanes and parking! Sure it will be nice and relaxing but life isn't suppose to be relaxing and easy. Life is suppose to be hard, with problems that you have to solve. If we have a car that drives on its own, people are going to get more lazy, their not goning to want to get up and help guide the car. They are going to think the car can do everything and anything! They might even fall asleep in the car and if the person whos driving the car they could be a heavy sleeper and the chairs aren't going to wake them up so they might die! They are going to be more lazy then they are today! For example, they wont wanna clean their houses, take their dogs for walks, anything like that!\n\nThis is why I disagree with this pasasge and we should not have cars that drive we can drive by oursevles! ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I highly suggested that the Electoral college should be changed to the election by popular vote for the president of the Untied States instead. With the electoral college system voters vote not for the president, but for a state of electors, who in turn elect the president. The problem with this is that when the electors go to vote for the presient, who are the electors? They could be anybody, so how would we know if our president that got choose had it fairly? Well, we dont. Instead of having the electoral college system we should change it to the popular vote of the people. By doing so, we can know that the president that got choose had it fair with all the other presidents that decided to run for the position to. Instead of when voting it being called a natural disaster which is what is known for as the electoral college we can know we voted fair by voting with the election by popular vote.\n\nThe people in the community should have the right in this because of the fact that , each and everyday we are going to have to live by the rules of the president, so we should have the right to vote for the president, and the outcome for whoever wins would be fair because thats who most the people think should run our country. At the basic level, the electoral college is unfair to the voters. Because of the winner-take-all system in each state, candidates dont spend time in states they know they have no chance of winning, only focusing on the tight races in the \"swing\" states. It is officaial the electoral college is unfair, outdated, and irrational.\n\nWith that being said i hope that the decision of changing the voting system from the electoral college system to the election by popular vote, and the outcome be very potitive. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Using the new technology called the Facial Action Coding System can help improve numourous lives. Being able to know how people are feeling all the time is good because you would be aware of their behaviors. This Facial Action Coding System is very unique and helps us a people understand eachother and share their emotions when they are inneed of a friend.\n\nFacial expressions aren't always a way of knowing how a person is expressing their emotion. The Facial Action Coding System will be very useful and helps us determine how to help our friends and families lives. It stated in the article that \"according to the facial feedback theory of emotion moving your facial muscles not only expresses emotions but it also help them be produced.\" Not only can the system help us produce our feelings but it can help us understand how others are feeling. The Facial Action Coding System can prove what a person is really feeling even if they fake their emotion because with this system the mucles in your face can't lie.\n\nThis new technology called the Facial Action Coding System can help us improve many lives and brings us closer together as a community. This system is very useful to everyone around the world because it can bring people together and be cautious of ours and others surroundings. A perfect example of how this system could help read our students emotions is because \"most communication is nonverbal including emotional communication. Just imagine if you had a child or student that was in need of your help butnever came to ask because they were shy or afraid of being judged and with this Facial Action Coding System it is now possible knowing how they could be feeling and what you ned to do to help advance and change their emotions to a positive feeling. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The development of driverless cars is a good idea, but should not be continued. It would be too risky, and more problems in the world would be caused. The employment rate would decrease, and more people would be without jobs. Also, it would cost alot of money to produce enough cars for the world. The developmnet of driverless cars should not be continued.\n\nIf driverless cars took over the transpotation system, there would be a decrease in available jobs. People looking to be taxi drivers, bus drivers, etc. would be overtaken by the manufactuer. If the need for driverless cars increases, there would be no need for a human driver.\n\nThough the production of driverless cars would save alot of money, there would also be a great amount of money wasted. Being that there are many problems faced with the cars now, advancing them would bring more problems. If cars that are made have alot of malfunctions, then money will have to be spent to fix them. There would be more ideas added to the vehicles, and more money spent to achieve, once unrealistic, goals.\n\nAccording to the article, saftey is best achieved with alert drivers. Using driverless cars, a great trust is being put into basically a robot. If there is a malfunction, and an accident occurs, there would be questioning on who to blame: the human or the car ? It would be more safer to have someone controlling the car, rather than the car controlling itself. The risk of injured pedestrians would possibly increase thus having a driverless car on the road.\n\nIn conclusion, the development of driverless cars should not be excelled.\n\nThey would increase the unemployment rate, causing more people to look for new jobs. Also, alot of money would be saved on fuel, but wasted on producing new ideas for the cars. The saftey rate would decrease, risking an accident according to a possible malfunction. The idea of driverless cars should not continue to be developed. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Who likes driving? Everyone has once though of cars that drive themselves. Although it sounds good, Im against the development of driverless cars. Driverless cars can be risky, expensive, and its against the law. Its not worth fighting for.\n\nFirst, driverless cars are too risky. It is dangerous to be in a vehicle that you can't control. If you were to be in a driverless car and something goes wrong do you even know what to do? Its like any other electronic that may need to be charged and things that charge have the possibility of blowing up. It's not like a motorized car with common mistakes it'll be something most mechanics haven't seen before, and would have to refer you to someone else who may be far and expensive.\n\nSecond, it would be very expensive. Smart cars are expensive and these are even smarter cars. In the article, it said \"Mercedes-Benz, Audi, and Nissan plan to have cars that can drive themselves by 2020.\" which are expensive branded vehicles and that makes driverless cars cost even more. The newer the more expensive. Also, if your driverless car needs repaired then it will be very expensive because not many mechanics will have the parts and the experience for these cars.\n\nLast, because it's a law. It's a law for a reason and there must have been problems with this before for this law to have been put in place. In the article, it said, \" In most states it is illegal to even test drive computer-driven cars\" so why would they be safe to put on the road?\n\nAlthough driverless cars sound fun, it is not worth it. I'm against driverless cars. Driverless cars can be risky, expensive, and they are against the law. These vehicles will cause havoc on the roads. Do not support driverless cars.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "September 1977\n\nWhen we first got the picture here at NASA we had no clue what it was or what it could be until my crew and I got a closer look into the the picture,it looked like a rock that had the shape of a face on it.My team and I could never put our fingure on what it was so I called in a scientist who studyed in these things,after looking closely a couple times he made the statement that it was made by Alien life on Mars.I thought that was a not very true at all because we had never discoverd other life on planets so how did he come up with this?\n\nAfter awhile of arguing and debate on what it was we sent out team back up,they had found another sighting just like this one.At first I was starting to belive that the scientist was right.Nasa got to dig deeper in this case because we just knew that it was not right that was not fromed by the aliens because there would have been more than just one.\n\nOn April 5 1998 we sent up Michael Malin and his mars Orbiter camera to see if he could capture a face.Michael got one but it was much sharper than the one before.We took a close look at it and had the scientist come back in again and once again he told us it was caused by other life on mars also known as the Aliens,but this was very impossible.\n\nApril 8 2001\n\nA clousless summer day in Cydonia mars global surveyor drew a close enough look to the picutre to try and figure out what it was.When we got the results back we here at NASA were all shocked at what we found out it was so I called up our friend.When he came in he was shocked too because he could have sworn it was made by aliens.As soon as we got the news we sent out a message to the news to inform everyone about what it was.\n\nAfter a very long time of trying to figure out what this object was and how it was created my team here at NASA finally discoverd that Aliens were not the cause of this face.Nasa has confirmed that it was the faces equivalent to a butte or mesa landforms very comman in the American west.So now my team and I and the the scientist are trying to figure out if there is anymore background on these faces.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Author suggest that studying venus is a worthy pursuit dispite its dangers in this article. In paragraph 3 it states, \"On the planet surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet.\" These coditions seem to make the task of traveling to venus sound difficult almost impossible but the author talks about another way we can observe venus man probed.\n\n\"NASA's possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of venus would allow scientist to float above the fray.\" The scientist at NASA want to fly above these clouds that venus has like the planes here on earth today when there is a storm. This blimp-like vehicle hovering 30 or so miles above the roiling venusian landscape.\n\n\"NASA is working on other approaches to study Venus. For example, some simplified electronic made of silicon carbide have been tested in chambers simulating the chaos of Venus surface and have lasted for three weeks in such conditions.\" One other way nasa is looking for a way to look at venus is using silicon carbide which were tested in chambers in NASA with a simulating like condition of Venus surface and have lasted for three weeks.\n\nThe author of this article supports the idea, the challenge of exploring Venus very well with many supports from the text. The author talk about the conditions on Venus are nothing compared to earth and the importance of getting to venus. In paragraph 4 the article states, \"Long ago, Venus was probably coverws largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life,just like Earth.\" The article explains that Venus long ago may have been sum what like earth with oceans and various life forms, but we will not know for sure if we never get to Venus and last there for only a few hours. The article is well explained and has more than enough details to support his claim. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "today we are going to talk about driverless cars . There has been people trying to invent a driverless cars . Which sounds pretty cool and helpful , but i think there is a good side to it and a bad side , or certain situations that you should be able to dirve driverless . But what comes with the manufacturing driverless cars , are new laws , and a little bit more worrys to certian incadents .\n\nyes , having a driverless car would be amazing in some peoples eyes , but i think that its not that big of an idea . there are many things that could happen in certian sittuations . if you get in a crash whos fault would it be ? yours or the other persons ? there is a way to prevent that and thats not to get a driverless car . people who have a non driverless car already dont pay attention to the road . so if a car can drive them they will be at even more of a risk because they probaly will think oh my car drives me i can do what i want . which isnt good at all because when the car sends the signal to get there attention there attention will be completley at something else , which means they might not get the signal , or sine there attention is gone they might get scared to freak out . But i think that a driverless car can be good use for certian sittuations like driving on the highway , and i say this because the highway dosnt have to many turns its just curves and straight aways . but in a city where people are driving towards you right next to you could just be a little bit more risky . If you really want to be at the highest risk of saftey you probaly should stick to driving your self , the social media , talking , and texting isnt worth death , funerals , and a sad family , or even kids without a parent .\n\nI dont disagree with the driverless cars but to me there is really no point in them to me . driving your self is better because you should already be at full attention to driving , and who would want to just sit in a car and watch it drive you ? I hope my essay makes as much sense as it does to me . now the choice is yours . ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Hot topics in today's world are pollution and global warming. While there is still debate, many people agree that cutting down society's use of cars would help the world be a better place. Greater limitation of car use will reduce pollution and better society.\n\nTo commence, reduction of car use will reduce pollution. Pollution is essentially hurting the planet as a whole, as well as all the organisms living in it. In fact, Paris, France, has recently taken action against car use effectively. According to Robert Duffer, \"[The smog] rivaled Beijing, China, which is known as one of the most polluted cities in the world.\" In only a few days, after banning half of the diesel and gas-run cars in the cities per day, \"The smog cleared enough Monday for the ruling French party to rescind the ban for odd-numbered plates on Tuesday.\" If such a change can happen in under a week, the entire world could benefit greatly from adopting similar policies. In the U.S, things are also turning around for the better. According to\n\nThe New York Times\n\n's article, \"The End of Car Culture,\" \"transportaion is the second largest source of America's emissions, just behind power plants.\" This is largely due to car culture in the U.S, which is fortunately declining. In fact, in the same article, it is said \"As of April 2013, the number of miles driven per person was nearly 9 percent below the peak and equal to where the country was in January 1995.\" This shows that America is well on it's way to becoming a greener nation without having to make dramatic changes to it's way of life.\n\nContinuing, more limited car use can better society, or at least work in a community. Society is currently too dependant on cars. However, Vauban, Germany is starting to change that. In another\n\nNew York Times article, Elisabeth Rosenthal states, \"70 percent of Vauban's families do not own cars, and 57 percent sold a car to move here.\" The remaining thirty percent of people hardly use their own cars for anything more than distant traveling, as most of Vauban's streets are \"car-free.\" This can show that a population of people, (in this case over 5,000 of them) can survive without constantly being behind a wheel. In another case, in Bogota, Columbia, there is a designated holiday to celebrate not using cars. Appropriately titled, \"Day Without Cars\" is an annual event held in order \"to promote alternative transportation and reduce smog,\" according to the\n\nSeattle Times's\n\nAndrew Selsky. While it may sound silly, the event had a huge turnout in spite of bad weather. Other cities joined into the fun after a few years, and also in the article, Enrique Riera, the mayor of a Paraguay town, said of the event, \"'These people are generating a revolutionary change, and this is crossing borders.'\" The simple effort to better the world has brought people together for a good cause.\n\nIn retrospect, the idea of declining the use of cars will help humanity as a whole greatly. Doing so would simultaneously slow down the destruction of the Earth for all organisms inside of it, and also help the human race better itself socially. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I believe that the landform was naturally created. My biggest reason for beliving this is because we do not have any strong evidence that aliens exist or existed on Mars. I also don't believe that this is a sign that aliens were on the planet because there is a strong chance that this is just a landform that happened to look like a human face.\n\nI do not belive that the formation is a human face. I do not believe this for many reasons but my biggest reason for believing this is just a feature on the land is that we don't have any solid evidence that there were aliens on te planet or existed period. People have tried to prove that there were aliens in space but no one has actually came up with hard evidence to show that ther may have been.\n\nMy next reason for not believing that this landform is a human face or was made by aliens that lived on Mars id because it could just have been by chance that the landform looked like a face. There are lots of monumental landforms that are unique. Some landforms just resemble different things because of werther conditions where they are and some just have been altered to look like that.\n\nThe article states that NASA has seen many unique and interesting landforms. There is no reason to believe that this is an exception. It may just be another landform that NASA only decided to reveal to the public to make money off of. The passage even states that it was the fact that they did not have a good camera affected what they saw.\n\nIn conclusion, I still do not believe thatlandform was caused by alien activity or was a human face. I believe it was just another unique landform that was made popular by the public and their suspence about aliens and foreign creatures. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "ever wondered what it would be like to have a car that drives by itself well, in the near future you might just find out. there are several companies trying to make autnomous cars but they have hit sume tuff spots like laws that provide safty for other people. in text the law says that the only safe car is one with a responsible human behind the wheel. the thing is that if we are to believe that these cars are for safty than we have to think about all the things that go wrong in everyday driving. then to make sure its one hundred percent safe the government would basically have to force everyone to buy these so called smart cars.\n\nthese companies are trying to make something for mostly lazy people. driving isnt that hard of thing to do if you know how to do it. the companies only want to make money thats our economy so, no matter how much these cars seem to good or worth while remember that something can always go wrong which yes, is true with anything but its rediculous that because you find driving boring or dont have the skill nessesary to do something the car can do for you'd buy a car that is just there so you'll give more money to a company that will out source your job to people in china because it's cheaper.\n\nso in conclusion you should see that smart cars yes could help but if you dont drive reponsibly you shouldn't be on the road in the first place. Dont buy things because it seems easier look at all the things these car dont provide protection from. its just more hipster junk to deal with in the justice system. So before you buy that sweet new car that can drive itself should make sure you're not the one getting hurt , because you might just find out.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars is a really bad idea. There are so many outcomes that could happen when the car is drving itself. It could malfunction and crash. The driver might not be paying attention and when they do have to take over, they don't and crash. And lastly there would be many people losing lots of money from sueings because people wouldnt know who was at fault, the driver or the manufacturer.\n\nThere are some positives to the driverless cars. For example people who just \"have\" to text can finally do that and when needed to drive can surely put there phone down for five minutesto help the car out. Also, less use of gas will help our world out with global warming, and the decrease of fossil fuels in the world. Finally, there would be a decrease in crashes across the nation, but many would not know who to blame.\n\nDriverless cars should not be aloud for may differnet reasons. First, if the driver is tired and is not doing anything but watching the road waiting for it to say for them to take over, they could fall alseep and not see the warning sign. Second, It would have possiblely more drunk driving accindents, becuase they would think the car would just take them home insted of them having to worry about it.\n\nDriverless cars are a bad thing and should not become a thing in the U.S. They wouldd lead to many dissagreements in court, people would take advantage of them. Lastly, people would dissrespect he car and what has been given to them from technology and think it is just a toy now!", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Athough cars are an important part of everyday life driverless cars would be an influeintial addition to public and private transportation.Driverless cars would help traversing through traffic easy. However I don't think that driverless cars should be aloud to be driven unless fully tested. The safety of people should be considered while making the cars.\n\n\" He envisions a future with a Public transportation system where a fleet of driverless cars form a public transport taxi system. The cars he forsees would use half the fuel of today's taxis and pffer far more flexibility than a bus. he belives such cars would fundamentally change the world.\" This would be usefull to people around the globe who don,t have cars or cant afford one. Driverless cars can be an important pat of sociaty.\n\n\"As a result, in most states it is illegal even to test computer-driven cars...manufactures believe that more states will follow as soon as the cars are proved more reliably safe. Still, even if traffic laws change, new laws will be needed in order to cover liability in case of an accident.\" This Exert from the passage supports my claim that they should only be aloud to be driven if they are fully tested and safe. Laws have been passed in some states to make this sure to happen.\n\nIn conclusion, I agree with Sergey Brin that driverless cars would be influeintial to the future of public and private transportation through out the world. However they should only be aloud to be driven if they safe and fully tested. Lastly I think driverless cars should be manufactured and tested thoroughly. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming\"\n\nthe author covers many points and facts about driverless cars. The author speaks about the advantages and disadvantages of the introduction of these cars. The author also speaks about the major companies making these cars from Google to Nissan. Nontheless driverless cars could prove to be unsafe, epensive, and have to many negative possibilites. These negative tradeoffs out weigh the possitive tradeoffs thus showing that introducing driverless cars would do more harm then good.\n\nThe article states \"Most driving laws focus on keeping drivers, passengers, and Pedestrians safe...\" The introduction of driverless cars would make this law harder to keep. This would be because the burden to be safe would no longer be in human hands but in the hands of a cumputer and some sensors. We have all had computers glitch or take a while to repond. It happens all the time. But then the safty of human life is in the hand of a computer it becomes somewhat disheartening. Weather conditions could also prove to be an issue with safty. Would there be a limit to how hot or how cold the environment would have to be for the sensors to work properly? With this much riding on the safty of human lives the driverless car seems to be a very unwise choice.\n\nThe answer on how expensive these cars would have to be is partly answered in paragraph six when the author states \"Radar was a device on a hilltpop that cost two hundred million dollars. It wasent something you could buy at a Radio Shack.\" If Radar back then was two hundred million dollars imagen how much a driverless car will be. Only the elite rich will be able to afford one and the majority of the popution will not. This shows that even if the driverless car was to come out in the near future only a handful of the population would have it since they would be the only ones who could afford it. But this also raises the issue with new roads since old ones would somewhat have to be updated in the long run. The article states that magnetic roads would be too expensive so smarter cars would be needed the roads would have to change a least a little to suit smart cars. With the many things that tax payer dollars are used for there would need to be an addition to smarter roads.\n\nThe negative possibilites of the introduction to smart cars are endless. The articel states \" in most states it is illegal even to test computer-driven cars.\" This shows that law makers are fearful or the outcomes that some of these cars could create. Also the problem with the rise in law suit when these cars would get into an accident would also have to be put into account. The article adresses the problem of who would be to blame the driver or the maker of the car. Not only would this bring out more problems and law suits it would make it hard to find who was at fault. Also in the possiblity of an acccident if people were to be sleeping or watiching a movie responce time to move the car would be a varying constant from person to person showing that even if people were to get involved the chance to change the situation could be very slim.\n\nWIth all of these negative situations\n\nthat driverless cars could cause it could be safe to say than the negative possibilites outweigh the positve possibilites. Driverless cars could prove to be unsafe, expensive, and have many negative possibilites. Showing that driverless are cars are not a very good idea. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Electoral College, its something that can change the amount of votes someone has rapidly depending on how many he or she has recieved. For some it is something that can help you, and for others its a nightmare. Most people would say it is something to be aware about and the rest dont care about it.\n\nTo start off, The Electoral College is not a physical builiding or place, its a process that the founding fathers established in the Constitution as a compromise between elections of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens. Most people belive that this process should be eliminated, some of those protesters are or were very important people, for example Bob Dole, he once said \"\n\nThe Electoral College is unfair, outdated, and irrational.\n\n\"\n\nSecondly, If someone is in the Electoral College and vote for who they want for President, really they dont vote for them, according to \"The Indefensible Electoral College\" by Bradford Plumer, the people on the Electoral College actually \"vote not for the President, but for a slate of electors, who in return elect the president.\" Thats messed up! They barley have any control on who they vote for. What if the electors dont vote for who the voters expect to win? Actually, this incedent has happend before in Hawaii in 1960 with two electors, \"faithless\" electors have occasionally refused to vote for their party's candidate and cast a deciding vote for whomever they please.\n\nNext, The Elecotral College is widley regarded as an anachronism. According to \"In Defense of The Electoral College\" by Richard A. Posner, \"\n\nthe advocates of this position are correct in arguing that the Electoral College method is not democratic in a modern sense...\n\n\". It is the electors who elect the president, not the people. When people are voting for a presidential candidate, they're actually voting for a slate of electors. Its is truley unfair for that to happen because the electors can betray the presidential nominee and cast their vote for the opposing nominee.\n\nFinally, It is entirely possible for the winner of the electoral vote will not win the national popular vote. It is very rare for something like that to occur. According to \"In Defense of The Electoral College\" by Richard A. Posner, \"\n\nIt happend in 2000, when Gore had more popular votes than Bush, yet fewer electoral votes...\"\n\n.A tie in the nationwide electoral votes is possible because the total number of votes, which is 538, is an even number, but it is highly unlikely.\n\nOverall, The Electoral College should be removed, because when the electors cast their vote, they dont really take part in the vote, it really is the slate. Sure, it can add more votes than the nominee actually has, but it is an unfair, outdated, and irrational procces that should no longer be in the Constisution. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The \"Evening Star\" or the name how you know, Venus is one in the second planet form the system sun in the speace; having for neighbor a Mars and his \"twin\" Earth. Venus in the system sun have a diferent speed in the same tima wiht Mars and Earth, but sometimes the Earth is closed to Mars and other times to Venus.\n\nThe planet Earth have a some of things simulatary between Venus, but this not can have life, becauses this planet hava a diferents conditions between the Earth, having all the atention for the people for study the planet, \"Numerous factors contribute to Venus's reputation as a challenging planet for humans to study, despite its proximity to us.\"\n\nThe planet Earth have an atmosphere of almost 97 porcent of carbone dioxide a diference whit Venus have a sulfuric acid atmosphere and a 800 degrees Fahrenheit, and am atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what esoerience on our own planet.\n\nThe conditions in the planet Venus is a \"extrem than anything human encounter on Earth.\"\n\nThe temperature on Venus has a tottest surface temperature of the any panets in the system, is closed to Mercury teh sun, and in adiotion hava a lot of natural disasters and the complement perfect to go to live, right?\n\nIn this times Venus have stills and more simulatires between Earth, because the planet now has a \" surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and creaters. Furthermore, recall that Venus can sometimes be our nearest option for planetry visit a curcial consideratioon given the long time frames of space travel. The value of returning to Venus...\"\n\nFor all this new information about Venus, the \"NASA,\" has the idea ofr study Venus, but the for where the NASA what ti use for study the planet is sending humans to the planet: the problen here is Venus not have a good condition for any hunan, animal or other thing alive, whit can sorvive for this condition, and if the humans go; in the fir time where stay want to satr toasty all the people and ahva a lot of problems in try to stay in the planet.\n\nThe other solution whit the NASA use for the study of the planet and don't use human is tray to take a photography and a videography, but this not worker. And the most importan in the investigation for the palnet is they not can take anithing about a sample rock or gas or something else a distanse, so for this moment the NASA don't can do anythin for study the Venus in this moments, but now is working haw can investige the planet.\n\nIn the 1940s in the time whit the Worls War II, the tecnology is played a rol of importance in this moment, and hire is well the Nasa have the idea for use that and tray to investigate, makin calculations and the computadores; but the computadores is more delicated for the fisical contidions wiht this have.\n\nIn this times the challenge for try to faound more information from the Venus and the idea fro the expedition a Venus I think this is continue in the mint form the persons in the NASA, but now not is the moment for do thas. Is the moment for use all the forms for try to keep all the informstion using the tecnology; for one day do the dream for the NASA: go to Venus and not have any problem. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "1. The author suggests that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents, because Venus sometimes called the \"Evening Star.\" The Evening Star is the brightest points of light in the sky. Aslo, Venus is the second planet from our sun.\n\n2. Venus is as Earth's \"twin,\" Venus is the closest planet to Earth in density and size. Earth, Venus, and Mars are our planetary neighbor, by orbiting the sun at different speeds. the speeds mean that sometimes we are closer to Venus and Mars. Humans have sent numerous spacecraft to land on the cloud-draped world. The spacecraft didn't survive the landing for more than a few hours.\n\n3. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has one particulary compelling idea for sending humans to study Venus. NASA's possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of Venus would allow scientists to float above the fray.\n\n4. peerkng at Venus from a ship orbiting or hovering safely far above the planet cam provide only limited insight on ground conditions because most forms of light cannotpenetrate the dense artmosphere, rendering standard forms of photography and videography ineffective.\n\n5. NASA is working on other approaches to study Venus. For some simplified electrones made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating the chaos of Venus's surface and have lasted for three weeks in such as conditions.\n\nVenus the a good planet. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "For some people having a car is a neccesity, but for others it can just be stressful. I believe it is much safer with out cars. There would be less accidents ,\n\nless pollution and it would save people a lot of money .\n\nIn Paris they had to enforce a partial driving ban to clear the smog. If there were drivers out on the road they got fined. This didnt stop everyone, there was counts of 4,000 people being fined for driving. Just five days after the partial ban congestion went down 60 percent.\n\nJust Imagine if five days of no driving caused congestion to go down 60 percent, how much would it go down if cars were eleminated all together.\n\nThere are some disadvantages to not having a car. Such as not being able to get where you need to go on time, biking or walking far places, getting sweaty before work or school ect.\n\nDriving can also be very stressful, for example when businessman Carlos said \"It's a good opportunity to take away stress and lower air pollution,\". This statement suggest that it is stressful to drive a car.\n\nIn conclusion, I would definitally want to have a car so i could get where i needed to go on time. I would also like to reserve the car only if i really needed to use it. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "A lot of arguments can be made after reading the article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming\". It is actually a very interesting article to read.\n\nA lot of people would actually like the idea of having self driving cars.\n\nMe on the oher hand, not so much.\n\nI completely disagree with the idea of having driverless cars on our roads.\n\nHaving self driving cars seem cool as it is, but they can pose many dangerious threats and safety concerns.\n\nFirst, there's always the possibility of the cars malfunctioning at one point.\n\nThe article says that the cars can accelerate and brake by themselves, but what if that didn't happen because something with the car went wrong?\n\nIt can put\n\ncivilians lives in danger if that were to happen.\n\nSecondly, when the driver is waiting for his or her turn to take control of the car, they could really get bored and lose focus on the road.\n\nSo when the car alerts the driver to take control of the car when the driver isn't paying attention, it could lead to a minor or severe accident.\n\nI know the article said they can put on some sort of entertainment to make sure the driver doesn't become bored, but there's still a possibility of that malfunctioning as well.\n\nIn conclusion, I really disagree with the idea of having driverless cars.\n\nThe idea may seem to captivate many peoples interest, but there are too many risks that come with this idea.\n\nSo to limit the amount of future possible accidents, I would say it's best for our safety to just leave cars the way they are now. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "If i was at NASA with Someone discussing about the with someone who thinks it was created by aliens i would dissagree with the person. One reason i would disagree is becuase that doesnt make sense. Another reason i would disagree is because How can aliens make faces? I mean Come on now, I honestly think the face of mars was made by the people who lived way before we did. In the passage it talks about when they found it, IT states that some astronaunt went to space and was exploring and came along the face, They were very amazed, So they decided to capture a picture of the face and showed the word the next day, as you read in the text. They face has became more realistic as we see the progress from 1976 to 2013 , May this is a sign to the world, But im tired so ima just end this here. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the last several years, car manufacturers have been working on self driving cars. There have been several developments in the programs for the self driving cars and some companies say that they'll have cars that can drive themselves by 2020. Other companies have the technology right now for self driving cars. Even though these companies are trying to make the cars safer, such as adding more sensors, video cameras and GPS recievers. I feel that the self driving cars are still unsafe.\n\nThe car company GM has developed driver's sears that vibrate when the vehicle is in danger of backing into an object. What would happen if the vibration system malfunctioned and the car backed up into an object and caused an accident? The passengers would be injured and possibly killed. With the self driving cars, there would be no steering wheel, so if the car happend to malfunction the passengers would be in serious danger. Another car company, BMW, announced they had a program called the \"Traffic Jam Assistant.\" The program could have the car steer, accelerate, and brake themselves. The driver would have to take over in work zones and around accidents, because the program was incapable of doing so. And with the new self driving cars there would have to be new laws created for these cars.\n\nTraffic laws would change drastically because new laws will be needed in order to cover liability in the case of an accident. Laws such as texting and driving or no alcohol use while your driving. Would it be okay now to drink and drive, or text while your in the car, the legal age to drive a car? If we had cars like this no one would pay attention to the road, and then anyone could drive at any time now, because you wouldn't have to steer. The question will also come up if there is an accident, who is to blame, the car manufacturer or the driver. Some states such as California, Nevada, Florida and the District of Columbia have allowed only limited use of self driving cars, because they fear they are unsafe. Other states have made it illegal to test computer-driven cars.\n\nThe cofounder of Google, Sergey Brin envisions a future with a public-transport taxi system. The passage said that he foresees the cars would use half the fuelof today's taxis and offer far more flexibility than a bus. He also says that such cars would fundamenally change the world. I do agree with him the self driving taxis would change the world, but to the worst. By creating self driving taxis it creates the problem of losing jobs. There are a lot of taxis in higher populated areas such as Chicago or New York. There would be so many people without jobs in those cities, which may lead to poverty. Another problem that comes up is if you needed to get your car fixed, you would just take it back the dealer. With that mechanics would be out of jobs too. Google has also modified the Toyota Prius that has sensors all over the car, it has a video camera mounted near the rearview mirror and a GPS receiver. The car even has a spinning sensor on the roof that used laser beams to form a constantly updating 3-D model of the car's surroundings. This sensor is supposed to mimic the skill of a human at the wheel, but its not the same. The sensor could malfunction at any time leaving the passengers in more danger than an actual human driving a car.\n\nSelf driving cars are up and coming, but they are very unsafe. No one would pay attention to the road, the laws would have to be changed, and possibly the roads. There will be more development within the next couple of years, by major car manufacturers and they will keep improving. There will be better technology for the cars, but the programs will never be human beings. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Cars have been a benefit to society ever since they were invented, they have helped us to move from place to place in a more efficient way than either horse or buggy could. Cars have also made the way we travel to become more clean than it was in the past, after all we don't have to clean up horse poop like we would if we still had to use horse and buggy. Cars have come a long way since they were invented and cars continue to change as time goes on, so isn't it only natural that driverless cars are the next step in the evolution of vehicles? I say yes they can make a safer more secure way of travel, after all humans often don't pay attention and make mistakes don't they? With computer driven cars all you will have to worry about is occasional glitches and even then the human in the car could just take over until they can get that fixed\n\nDriverless cars would be a\n\nbenefit to people everywhere. They could replace Taxi's and could create a system of transport anyone could use instead of just those who have access to buses or trains. These cars could come with better safety features than our cars do and have entertainment systems to keep people occupied while the car drives for them. You wouldn't need to worry about keeping your kids in check while driving either because the car will be driving for you. One example would be features like the antilock breaks and the sensors could also catch dangers the human eye couldn't catch on it's own.\n\nDriverless cars could prevent more wrecks from animals or children running into the road due to the car being able to spot them quicker than a human could and could help save animals from being roadkill for the same reason. Who knows where technology will go and how far it will improve in the future, within 3 years we could have better sensors and computers up to 3 times as fast and efficient as we have today. Think of the possibilities that driverless cars could bring in the future,\n\nYou may say that cars could glitch out, or bring up issues of liability if there is an accident but cars and technology are evolving and so is the average persons understanding of technology improving. Both of these factors can change how the outcome will turn out, and the fact that recording devices can be used to figure out if it's a technological or human error, since these cars aren't driverless quite yet so they do require a human sitting in them to fix if the problem if something goes wrong. Also laws could be passed stating that a certified human driver must be behind the wheel in case of an error occuring.\n\nThe fact is the benefits of driverless cars far outweigh the costs of them. They can help prevent many accidents and cases of human error as well as prevent tragedy and loosen up some of the time we have to spend driving, for instance they can take your kids to school while you have to work on a project for your job, or they could drive you as you write an essay or do homework if you are a student or work on your latest assignment for your job. Cars are evolving fast and their going to continue to evolve and this is a good thing because they can fix human error and be used to prevent accidents.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "What if we didn't have to drive anymore?\n\nWhat if the cars controlled themselves?\n\nWe wouldn't have to take the bus or a taxi anymore.\n\nIt can save us money by using less fuel.\n\nDriverless Cars would help out so many problems.\n\nThere wouldn't be as much accidents.\n\nBlind people or the disabled could finally get around places.\n\nGoogle has had cars that could drive independently under specific conditoins since 2009.\n\nThe person in the car would need to be alerted to pull into driveways or deal with complicated tracffic issues.\n\nThey built sensors and cameras all around the car so it could detect all the cars around it or when to stop and start.\n\nCompanies started with the idea of smarter roads.\n\nSmarter roads would help navigate the car with radio signals.\n\nThe idea would work very well just that it was to expensive to be practical.\n\nSo they decided to go with the idea of smarter cars.\n\nThey put sensors all over the car so and they also were able to update the software to make everything safer.\n\nThe \"driverless cars\" still needed a driver.\n\n\"Why would anyone want a driverless car that still needs a driver?\"\n\nScientists tried to find a solution by adding alarm systems.\n\nThis would allow you to do what need or want to do and the car would alarm you until you take control over the wheel.\n\nSome states have laws that does not allow these driveless cars to drive in.\n\nThey believe that the only safe car has a human driver in control at all times.\n\nManufacturers believe that more states will change the law after they see how safe this driverless car is.\n\nThere is still that question if there is an accident, whos fault is it?\n\nThe man driving or the manufacturer?\n\nAutomakers are still continuing this project in hopes of solving more problems in the future.\n\nTesla has created a car in 2016 that can drive on autopilot 90 percent of the time.\n\nThey plan to have a car to drive itself by 2020.\n\nSo close to getting to the destination.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I claim to go against the technolgoy because you can't just look into\n\na screen and have it say you're happy,sad, or angry that's not how it works. It all depends on the days because not everyone\n\nwill be happy, sad, or angry everyday of their life like tomorrow I can be very hapy,sad,angry I will not know until tomorrow. Technology may be improving in this generation but I do not believe that looking into a camera or screen can tell what emotion you are giving off. You can even look into the camera with a angry face but be having the best day of your life no technology will ever tell you what you are feeling. The only thing or person that should be telling how you are feeling is you. Yes technology can do impressive things now in our generation like open our phones with just our finger print or face recgonition or build 3D items but i don't believe technology should be telling us if we are happy, sad, or angry those are human feelings and if we let technology tell us how we are feeling then we are giving away our power to technology. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars are a great investment and idea for our country to encourage. Not only do the cut down on fuel usage, but also reduce the number of accidents. The futuristic automobiles could revolutionize the country. Drivereless cars are a fantastic idea, and could create several benifits for the country.\n\nDriverless cars have the potentiol to drastically reduce fuel usage. In the opening paragraph of the article, the author states, \"the cars he forsees would use half the fuel of today's taxis.\" Less fuel used for automobiles would empower the United States to spend less money on oil and natural gas imports. Additionally, less fuel polution released by cars would help make the enviroment a safer place for current and future generations.\n\nIn the article, the author talks about the use of GPS and sensors used in the cars. Relying on computers to transport us is a much safer alternative compared to the current option. The driverless cars, that are largely computer powered, leave very little room for human error, which would drastically reduce the number of automobile accidents.\n\nOppontens of driverless cars may argue that these cars are not safe in the event of unforseen circumstances, such as accidents or road problems. However, driverless cars, as stated in the article, \"are designed to to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skill.\" Thus, in an emergancy situation, the driver can take over the car can advance past the situation and continue to move along without any issue.\n\nIn conclusion, driverless cars could be the best thing to happen to automobiles since automobiles were invented. They could reduce the amount of pollution, and save the United States millions on oil imports. Furthermore, self driving cars can make the roads a safer place to be. Although it may seem scary to some, and there may be a few bumps along the road, driverless cars could make the world a better place to be. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "There are a lot of things that develop and hold a Electoral College together. There are also a lot of down falls to the Electoral College. Every state has 1 House of Representative plus 2 of your Senators in the Electoral College. There are a total of 538 people but 270 of them is the majority vote that wins. There are a total of 5 reasons why we have to keep this method to choosing the president. The 5 ways are Certainty of outcome,Everyone's President,Swing States,Big States and Avoid Run-Off Elections.\n\nThe main reason we have a Electoral College is so they have a right way to choose a president. The main reason for this is so that we dont leave our electing in the hands of foriegn people/immiagrants. The is what the president needs to get elected in the electoral college. There are still a lot of down falls to this method of the electoral college though. One of these issues is \"at the most basic level, the electoral college is unfair to voter\". This means \"winner takes all\" which is they only focus on the bigger states and not the smaller ones because the bigger states have bigger population which means they have more in the electoral college. Another issue with this method is that the person thats running for president might get the popularity vote but still not win. See everyone that votes isnt really voting directly for the president, the people who really count is the electoral college. In order to win the vote you have to convice the electoral college and thats not always easy. So remember just because you won popular vote doesnt mean you won the majority of the electoral vote.\n\nThere are 5 reasons why we keep this method of electing the president. The first reason is Certainty of Outcome. This means \"it's less likley than a dispute over the popular vote.\" Which really means the candidates share to the other people in the Electoral college there share of the popular vote and thats how they vote. The second reason is Everyone's President. This is basically shows that \"the Electoral College requires a presidential candidate to have trans-regional appeal.\" This means that no region such as south,northwest,etc. has enough electoral votes to elect a president. The third resone to keeping these methods is Swing States. This tells me that its the \"winner takes all method.\" The fourth method why we should keep these methods is the Big States. This explains that \"the Electoral College restores some of the wieght in the political balance.\" this means that the bigger states get a big advantage in the electoral because the people that get elected into office there is based off of population so they have an advantage. THe bigger states get more attention from the candates then the smaller states do. The final reason why we should keep this method of voting is Avoid Run-Off Elections. This means \"the Electoral College aviods the problem of Elections in which no candidates recieves a majority of the votes cast\". This means no pressure for candidates when they win majority of the votes cast.\n\nThere are many ways to develop and to hold the Electoral College together. There are many ways that it falls apart and has it flaws but its the best way for our econany to vote for president. If you think about it if we just did popularity vote that would be like leading our hands into a world of immigrates who know a very little. There a lot of rules for our Electoral process buyt its the best way and the only way we have to becoming a better place. Dont forget to look at the 5 reasons we keep this the way it is. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Earth is geting really closely to Mars,Venus. The Earth is right next thoes to plants. Also the plant Mars,Venus are on the side of plant Earth. The plant Venus is sometimes call \"Evening Star,\" that is one of the brightest points of light in the night time.\n\nThe Plant Earth might have a twin plant venus and Plant Venus is also closest\n\nto the Earth. Both of the Pants don't have the same size. Mars have other planetart neighbor like the sun at different speeds. the different speeds means that there closer to mars and different times to venus.\" These differences in speed mean that sometimes we are closer to Mars and other timees to Venus.\"2\n\nNASA have one of the 3 \"particularly compelling\" there idea is to send humans to sutdy in the plants venus. NASA might solutisits to the hostile conditions on the surface. Think about blimp like vehichle hoveering 30 or more then miles. That's\n\nwhat \"The Challenge of Exploring venus\" is about. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The software is the latest innovation from Prof. Thomas Huang, of the Becjman Institute for Advanced Science at the University of Illinois. Can we actually \"calculate\" emotions? How can a computer recognize the subtle facial movements we humans use to express how we feel?. These process begins when the computer constructs a 3-D computer model of the face, all the major muscles in the model must move like human muscles. These program can really help teachers to figure out how thier students are feeling.\n\nNuci Sebe of the University of Amsterdam Dr. Huang and his colleague are experts at developing better ways for humans and computers to communicate. These new process begins when the computer constructs a 3-D computer model of the face, all 44 major musvloes in the model must moke like human muscles. movement of one or more muscles is calle an \"action unit\". as an examole six classified basic emotions six basic emotions as happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness and then associated each with characteristic movements\n\nof the facial muscles.\n\nCan we actually calculate emotions? the facial expressions for each emotion are universal. The new emotion recogniton sfotware tracks these facial movements in the real face or the painted face of Mona Lisa. For example each expression is compared against a neutral face.In fact we humans perfroms this same impressive calculation. As the last example a classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored. Then it could modify the lesson.\n\nHow can a cumputer recognize the subtle facial movements we humans use to express how we feel? the new computer software stores a similar anatomical information as electronic code that allows the computer to describe the feeling that are beings expressed while the picture was taken. In fact are the instructions for a face that looks happy. It's all about those muscular action units.\n\nWhoever tought making faces could reveal so much about the science of emotions is a really helpfull software that allows the teachers to know hoe their students are feeling. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "While the people of America can't go a day without using their car, other countries such as Vauban, Germany, Paris, and Bogota, Columbia decided to ban cars, or do not use them for one day. The main reason for banning cars, is because of all the air polution that spread thoughout the countries. For these countries they felt that this was a great idea to stop their smog and pollution problem.\n\nIn Vauban, Germany people felt happier to go without a car. Owning a car isn't forbidden, you just have to buy a space for it that costs $40,000 with a home. Most families don't own a home, over 70 percent dont own one. A media trainer with two childen, feels happier without a car. This trend is growing thoughout Europe and to other countries as well. Vauban has even placed stores closer to the suburbs, instead of malls that is further in the distant. The Environmental Protection Agency in the United States is spreading the idea of \"car reduced\" communities, and are starting a act.\n\nParis banned cars due to the smog that keeps intensifying. They blamed diesel because of France tax policy. The tax policy favors more for diesel than gasoline. If you brought your car, they would impound your car or you had to pay a fine of 22-euro or $31. Traffic has gone down 60 percent in the capital of France due to the intensifying smog. Paris has more smog than any other European capitals.\n\nIn Bogota, Columbia they now have a day where no one will use a car for one day. Millions of Colombians decided to use this day to go hiking, go on there bicycle, skate, or take the bus to go to work. Even though Bogota has many rain showers, the people still participated for this day. Some people there say that it is a good way to get rid of stress and lower air pollution.\n\nThe invention of the car was a great thing a long time ago, but some people say that this is the end of the car culture. Fewer people buy cars or even getting their licenses every year. researchers are wondering if this is the peak of driving. The researchers are thinking that America's love of cars is slowly fading away. As people see it, they think that this is much safer, conserves resources, and lower emissions. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Foremost, the electoral college is a process used for selecting a president through the popular vote of qualified respesenators. The electoral college was established by our founding fathers, and still benefits us today. Using trusted representatives and efficently casting the desired vote, the electoral college is the best method of selecting a president. The electoral college allows the country to be sure of an outcome, and no one region can elect a president on its own.\n\nElectoral votes are cast by electors chosen to represent each state, these electors are \"...trusted to vote for the party's nominee...\", stated Richard Posner. This means that electors are trusted and qualified to efficiently represent the vote their state desires. The trust set upon electors is \"rarely betrayed\" Posner said. The last time an election was won by someone who didn't get the popular vote was in 2000, and this doesn't happen often. This is contrary to what was said by Bradford Plumer. Plumer stated \"The American people should consider themselves lucky that the 2000 fiasco was the biggest election crisis in a century; the system allows for much worse.\"\n\nThe electoral college gives America certainty of an outcome, without a tie, or a run-off election. The ability to rest easy knowing there will be a clear winner is an ability given to America, by the system of electoral votes. A tie occurance in an election is \"Highly unlikely...\" Posner said. Even though most states use a \"Winner-take all\" basis, ties and run-off elections are still extremely rare and unlikely.\n\nSwing states- a debated and popular issue amog the electoral college. Swing states are often paid more attention and given more information than regular states. While being paid more attention, the swing states together are able to determine the election's outcome. Though small states don't get much attention, they still have a say in the election. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "On May 24, 1976, NASA's Viking one spacecraft was circling mars. It took many photos of landing sites for its sister ship Viking two. As viking one took pictures, it came across a pecuiliar formation on the surface of the planet. The formation seemed to be an enormouse head similar to that of a humans. The scientist figured it was just another Martioan mesa, that was commonly spread throught the surface of Mars.\n\nConspiracy theorists think that it is bona fide evidence that there is life on Mars. Defenders of the NASA budget wish there was an acncient civilization on Mars. And so on April 5, 1998 another Mars global surveyor flew over and took a picture ten times sharper than the original photos. This led the the scientist to conclude and reveal that the face was just a natural land form and that it wasn't an alien monument at all.\n\nSome people were not happy. The face on Mars is located at 41 degrees north of the martian latitude where it was winter in April 1998. This was a coudy time of year on Mars. They had said that the camera the pictures had been taken with had to peer through clouds to see the Face. They believed that the alien markings were hidden by the haze at the time.\n\nOn April 8, 2001, there was a cloudles day on Mars. The surveyor drew close for another picture. They said they increased the image quality to take the best picture they had taken of the face. They added that in a digital image 3 times bigger than the pixle size you could see things like airplains, egyptian-style pyramids, or even small shacks.\n\nThis showed people that it was the Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa, which are landforms common around the American West. This showed that the conspiracy theorists had been proven wrong. Since NASA actually researches theier data to learn more about it and they make hypothesize, it shows that they have a lot of since in saying that theorists are wrong. Theorist just make theories and they don't have anything to back them up if someone were to arugue about the subject. Conspiracy theorists are not always wrong but in this case they are. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In your everyday life, just about anywhere you go you will see people traveling from place to place in their own veichles. Is the idea of us, as indivisuals, not owning our own motor veichles even an option? The idea of not being able to transport where you need to be when you need to be there is a terrorfying thought. But, when put into consideration you will find it some what reasonable.\n\nJust think about it, all the toxins released into the air and all the traffic we can be stuck in for hours at a time! Reducing the clutter and the use of oils is enfact very possible. Residents in Vauban, Germany have copletely almost completly cut owing cars out of their community. 70 percent of Vauban's familys don't own cars while 57 percent sold their cars to move there. With mostly \"car-free\" streets with the exception of the main thoroughfare, Vauban has forbidden driveways and home garages. Though car ownership is aloud if the car- owner buys a space to park it, Vauban is leading an example of an alternative way that communities can live reducing greenhouse gas emissions.\n\nThis example has most certainly envulenced Paris enforcing a partial driving ban. pollution, a large issue in the streets of paris, is being reduced with a driving ban fining anyone who did not leave their cars at home. After five days of this ban, congestion in france was down 60 percent.\n\nThough completely banning cars may be found inconfiniate or extreme, Bogota, colombia, takes place in this uprising craze by devoting one day a year to \"The Day Without Cars\". By doing this they strive to promote alternative transportation and reduce clutter in this capital city. Violators of this event would recieve 25$ fines. The community who participated in this event have found alternate transportation, and comfort in a break from the clutter. Businessman Carlos Arturo is quoted \"It's a good opportunity to take away stress and lower air pollution\", he rode a two-seated bicycle with his wife to get from place to place. As more Colombian citied participate in the event Municipal authorities from other countries came to Bogota to see the eveny and were enthusiastic. Enriqur Riera, the mayor of Asuncion, paraguay stated that \"These people are generating a revolutionary change, and this is crossing borders\".\n\nThese changes are most certainly revolutionary and are changing the way we see our lifes and the way we see transportation. The idea of us working, learning, and living without indivisual automoblies is becoming to look like a huge possibilty. The fact that there are communties taking part in this act, reducing polution and clutter, show that this very well could be part of a change for us and the way we live. With the owner-ship of automobiles and drivers liscenses going down in america, Mimi Sheller, a sociology professor at Drexel University and director of its Mobilitier Research center, stated that \"Different things are converging which suggest that we are witnessing a long-term cultural shift\". ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Have you ever wanted to get a chance to explore beautiful and foreign lands? Well then, joining the Seagoing Cowboys would definitely be the job for you. I, Luke Boberger, am a former Seagoing Cowboy and I have crossed the Atlantic Ocean 16 times and have crossed the Pacific Ocean twice to help those affected by World War II. Being a Seagoing Cowboy was a great adventure, but it was also more than that. It opened up the world to me.\n\nIf you join the Seagoing Cowboys, you get to see, and sometimes visit, amazing and beautiful places. When myself and the crew first set sail from New Orleans to deliver 335 horses to Greece, I couldn't wait to get there. I saw the Acropolis in Greece, and it was beautiful! When delivering animals to these foreign lands, I also got the side benefit of seeing a lot of Europe and China. I got to take a gondola ride in Venice, Italy, explore an excavated castle in Crete, and I marveled at the Panama Canal on my way to China.\n\nBy joining the Seagoing Cowboys, you get the important, but rewarding, job of caring for those in dire need. When I joined the Seagoing Cowboys, I had no idea the happiness you receive from helping those who need help. By delivering food supplies, animals, and even more, you make these people's lives a lot more easier. You are giving them food, animals to make into food, and animals to help with work. Helping these citizens really opened my eyes to the rest of the world.\n\nThe final thing I'm going to tell you about is having fun. When I was on the ship, and the animals and supplies had been delivered, we had fun on the ship. It wasn't the reason I had joined, but it is definitely a joyous side benefit. Us cowboys would play baseball and volleyball games where animals had been kept. We also held table-tennis tourneys, fenced, boxed, read, and whittled to pass the time. It's amazing what you can do when you're bored on a nearly-empty ship!\n\nThese are the reason why I believe that all able and willing men need to join the Seagoing Cowboys. You get to see wonderful lands. You also can have fun on the ships. Most importantly though, you get to help those in need. It's amazing that doing a job like this can make such an impact on people's lives. Join the Seagoing Cowboys! ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "It was the first time that I was able to come home it was right after our second trip. I was asking my friend if he could sign-up that we could use the extra help. When I told him I craked some ribs he said he was out. The next day I tell him that I sliped down a slippery ladder after reporting my hourly report to the captin i sliped down a ladder my heart raced as i was slidding towds a opening but a strip of metel cought me, then i told him I was night watchman. When we were loading up the catle I saw my friend he was signing up to join our boat.\n\nA few years later we lost a few men and that we needed more people or else we couldent go and finish the trip. We were in Greece when this happend so we had to find someone that could speak English. Three days later a man with a French acsent comes up to me and says \"do you know any jobs that i can get to America like that UNRRA(United Nations Relife and Rehabitations Administration)?\" I told him \"were looking for people that will help us deliver the rest of the catle to China\". When I was walking back to the boat I saw a man stealing the catle and it was that guy I was talking to so i found the Police and they cought him. I asked the Police \"would any of you like to join the UNRRA a few of them said yes\".We went back to the boat and loaded the catle up and they signed up and we were off the China I was happy because we needed someone that had experiance being a watchman and enjoyed it.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author supports this idea by giving sceintific reaserch and by saying that NASA is working one very compelling idea to be able to send humans to study Venus. Here are those details, ideas, facts, and how well the author supports that sudying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents.\n\nThe author starts out by saying that Venus some times called the \"Evening Star,\" is one of the brightest points of light in the night sky. And by saying although easy to spot and observe from the distant but safe vantage point of earth has proved a very challenging place to examine more closely. And says that Venus is often refured to as earths twin and that shares many features like density and size, and occasionaly is the closest planet to earth.\n\nHe goes on to say that Venus may have once been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system. And how astronemers beleive that long ago Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life like earth does today. And today Vensu still has some features that are analogous to those of earth like. A surface of rocky sediment, and includes some familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and craters.\n\nHe also states some of the dangers of visiting Venus and that is has. A thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets. And even more challenging are the clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere. He says that on the planets surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experince on earth. And those conditions are far more greater than than anything humans encounter on Earth. And such an enviornment would crush even a submarine accustomed to diving to the deepest parts of the oceans and would be able to liquefy many metals. And its surface temprature is the hottest of any planet in our solar system, even though Mercury is closer to the sun. And Venusian geology and weather present additional impediments like erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequent lightning stikes to probes seeking to land on its surface.\n\nThe idea nasa has is to hover around thirty-plus miles above venus's surface, tempratures would still be toast around 170 degrees Fahrenheit but the air pressure would be closer to that of sea level on Earth. And although we have sent many spacecraft to land on Venus. Each mission unmaned and for good reason considering no spacecraft survived the landing for more than a few hours which explains why not a single spaceship has touched down on Venus in more than three decades.\n\nFinaly, the author suports the idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents by. Giving us facts on the planets history why we haven't already landed on it. Ideas for how to study it more closely. And by ending the article by saying. \"Striving to meet the challenge presented by Venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained from the planet itself, but also becasue human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors. Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by the dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very deges of iagination and innovation.\"", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Facial Action Coding System (FACS) is a recent advancement in technology that can read emotions from facial expressions. Many people speculate where it could be used, from marketing to video games. Some might wonder whether it could be used in classrooms, which is a definitive \"No.\" FACS is not valuable to read student's emotional expressions because the classroom shouldn't include emotion, it has better uses elsewhere, and is invasive of privacy.\n\nEmotion shouldn't dictate the lesson in schools. In the passage, Mr. D'Alto quotes, \" 'A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored,' Dr. Huang predicts. 'Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.' \" (6). Everyone has walked into class one day, seen the lesson and then silently grumbled to themselves. This type of emotion shouldn't change what the lesson is or how it is taught. The goal of teaching techniques is to effectively teach the broadest audience. This type of system would switch up the lesson for the few people who get confused easily, but then it hurts the majority's learning experience. This is why the classroom shouldn't include emotion.\n\nSystems such as FACS have better economical value elsewhere. In the passage, Mr. D'Alto says, \"For example, if you smile when a Web ad appears on your screen, a similar ad might follow. But if you frown, the next ad will be different.\" (6). This is one example of other industries that could utilize this type of technology. In the classroom, there is no economical value of being able to read the students emotions. Mr. D'Alto goes on to say, \"The same technology can make computer-animated faces more expressive- for video games or video surgery.\" These are other industries that would love FACS-like technology. It's a better investment to use FACS elsewhere other than the classroom.\n\nPrivacy is held dear by many. FACS can be invasive of this. Some students may wish to save their grief for a counselor, therapy, or simply a designated time to cry. FACS completely disrespects this fact and exposes an individual to everyone else. In the passage, D'Alto quotes, \" 'Most human communication is nonverbal, uncluding emotional communication,\" notes Dr. Huang. 'So computers need to understand that, too.' \" (6). This quote implies that computers are not yet able to comprehend whether or not the individual wishes to be \"scanned\", for a lack of a better term. This can be invasive. Until technology reaches a point until this changes, FACS should stay out of the classroom where students may not wish to have their emotions expressed involuntarily.\n\nIn conclusion, FACS is not only worthless, but harmful to the learning quality of students. This is because it has better uses elsewhere, is a breach of privacy and includes emotion into the classroom. FACS is, and may never be suitable for a classroom environment.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Limiting car usage is great, I mean the more money you save to go out and try or do different things. The biggest question everybody that reads these articles might ask. \"How do you get to other places for example the Airport or if you wanted to go to Disney or somewhere else. Anyway back on topic. \"All of our developement since World War II has been centered on the car, and that needs to change.\" says David Goldberg, an official of Transportation for America. The question every pereson who is legal to drive \"How much you drive is as important as whether you have a hybrid.\n\nFirst and Foremost, Vauban, home to 5,500 residents within a rectangular square mile, may be the most advanced experiment in low-car suburban life. Passengers cars are responsible 12 percent of greenhoudse gas emissions in Europe and up to 50 percent in some car-intensive areas in the United States. In the United States the Enviormental Protection Agency is promoting \"car reduced\" communities. Many experts expect public transport serving suburbs to play a larger part in a new six-year federal transportation bill to be approved this year. In previous bills, 80 percent of appropriations have by law gone to highways and only 20 percent to other transport.\n\nNext, After days of near-record pollution , paris enforcd a partial driving ban to clear th air of the global city. Motorists with even-numbered license plates were ordered to leve their cars at home or suffer a 22-euro fine ($31). The same would apply to the odd-numbered plate sthe following day. Almost 4,000 drivers were fined according to the international news agency(Reuters). Congestion was down 60 percent in the capital of France ,after five -days of intsensifying somg. Diesel fuel was blammed, since France has a tax policy theat favors diesel over gasoline. Paris typically ahs more smog than other European capitals. Las week Paris had 147 microgramsof particulate matter. Public transit was free of charge from Friday to Monday. The somg cleared enough Monday for the ruling French party rescined the ban for odd-numbered plates on tuesday.\n\nLast, Recent studies suggest that americans are buying fewer cars, driving less and getting fewer licensices as each year goes by. That has left researchers pondering a fundamental question \"Has America passed the peak of driving?\" America's love affair with its vehicles seems to be cooling. The United States peaked in 2005 and dropped steadily thereafter. As of April 2013, the number of mile driven per person was nearrly 9 percent below the peak and equal to where the country was in the year 1995.\n\nInconclusion all of the less car usage is being used all across the globe. Things like this are good to keep up. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "From the article \"Unmasking the Face on Mars\", it leaves two questions unanswered. Is it natural or not? Is there other life or just things happening to be that way? My vote goes to natural non-life forms.\n\nThere is no acurate way to say that there is life forms but if there were other life forms and the government isn't just hidding things, then we would have found out about it by now. When the picture was taken it could have just been cloudy and maybe the rock formation has been there for awhile. \"'As a rule of thumb, you can discern things in a digital image three times bigger than the pixel size.'\"\n\nThis face or figure that we say we see isn't really that at all. For instance a car doesn't have a face but yet you could easily imagine it having one. If we see two slits and a larger one below it, to us, this resembles a face. This figure juts from it's frame because over time things change. The mars dust or sand could just as easily have been blown by wind and formed this \"creation\".\n\nIn this article,\"'It reminds me most of Middle Butte in the Snake River Plain of Idaho.'\" The plain in Idaho could be natural and so why can't this \"face\" be natural. There is nothing wrong with nature's beauty giving us questions and allowing us to make accusations.\n\nSo therefore, there is no other life forms. There is no \"face\" on mars. This is all just a mixup and it shows up one way our minds work. One way we can see nature's beauty. Instead of trying to argue, why not trust science?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Driveless Cars Are Coming\" is an article that discusses the idea of autonomous cars. They say the car has been initiated since 2009 by Google. The car can drive itself, while the human can just sit and relax, but this is for only 90 percent of the time. The human has to drive it around complicated traffic issues, such as navigating through roadwork or accidents. The problem given up in this article is if we should allow self driving cars or not. I belive we should have self driving cars because they will reduce accidents, reduce tickets, and help old people.\n\nAs human beings we are prone to mistakes. We are constantly making mistakes and are not perfect. This causes a window for accidents when driving. Well the self driving car would decrease accidents on the road. The self driving car is said to have sensors, cameras, and laser beams to form an updating 3-D picture of it's surrondings. This function will give a wider view of the road causing less accidents. Besides it giving a wider view, the sensors can cause the car to apply brakes and even reduce power from the car's engine. These functions cannot be applied on humans giving reasons to have these cars.\n\nFurthermore, these self drivers will help reduce tickets. Year round people receive tickets from officers around the nation. The car can handle speeds up to 25 mph. The function will drastically reduce speeding tickets. Another benefit of these self driving cars is that it will help drunk drivers, long distance driver, and sleepy drivers. Instead of taking the risk of driving drunk, wasting time to be sober, or paying a taxi, a drunk person could just have a self driving car drive him/her home. Also it can help long distance drivers or sleepy riders. For long distance riders they can entertain theirselves because the company BMW and others plan to bring in-car entertaiment. Implementing these ideas causes drivers not be exhausted due to driving miles and miles. On the other hand sleepy drivers could get a bit of sleep time, while the car drives, which would be better than driving sleepy because it causes slow reactions and ultimately would cause a crash. A rebuttal to this would be that the car is in control 90 percent of time. The 10 percent only occurs during incidents like accidents and work zones. What if an occurence like this happens when someone is drunk? Well incidents like this don't occur regularly and accidents will be reduced with self driving cars.\n\nLastly the self driving car would be helpful to old people or people with glasses. Lets say someone was in a hurry and forgot to wear their glasses or contacts. This would be no problem because they wouldn't be drving the car. Even though there is that 10 percent where the driver has to drive, the person will the glasses still could probably see to be able to go through a work zone or an accident. The driver wouldn't be blind, the car just makes it safer because they wouldn't have to go through the agony of having to squint to see signs. I gave up the topic earlier that humans are prone to mistakes. Well as you get older you are prone to more mistakes. Old people don't have the best eyesight, reactions, or focus. With this car they wouldn't have to worry about those problems. The old citizens can sit down and relax to get to where they need to be.\n\nThe invention of self driving cars would change the Earth in many ways. it will lets us relax, while it cruises itself to our desired locations. It has sensors, beams, and a camera on it, with the ability to stop it self. This car would truly be\n\nrevolutionary. The car should be accepted to have out on our roads because it would cause less accidents, tickets, and help our elders. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In 1976 a strange humanlike face was found on Mars by NASA's Viking 1. A giant face almost two miles long was thought to be created by aliens. But NASA scientists thought differently.\n\nI believe that the face is a natural ladform as well as NASA. Becsause the NASA scientists proved it was a mesa and that they had no reason to cover up alien life.\n\nThe face was found in one of the regions of Mars called Cydonia. Scientists were in shock at first, but they stated that it was a Martian mesa even though a face like structure was seen in the pictures. A couple days afterward the formation was unveiled for the public to see and they went insane over the images.\n\nThe conspiracy theroies piled up as some stated that the pictures were perfect evidence of life on Mars. NASA's budget only wished that there was actual life on Mars but knew all to well there was no life on Mars. Only a handful of NASA scientists thought of this as an alien artifact, but getting more pictures of it was a top priority for NASA. On April 5, 1998, Mars Global Surveyor flew over Cydonia for the first time, Mars Orbiter Camera team took a picture ten times sharper than the original photos. Thousands of web surfers were waiting for the image to appear on a JPL web site. There wasn't an alien monument. But all it did was reveal a natural landform.\n\nI was thrillled when I read this becuase it proved my hypothesis correct. But there were still some people who werent satisfied by the images. Some people claimed that there was a haze that kept the alien markings hidden. On April 8, 2001 on a cloudless summer day in Cydonia the Mars Global Surveyor got close enough for a second look. Using the cameras highest resolution it took a picture of the face. Jim Garvin, chief scientist for NASAs Mars Exploration Program stated As a rule of thumb, you can discern things in a digital image 3 times bigger than the pixel size, also he said So, if there were objects in this picture like airplanes on the ground or Egyptian-style pyramids or even small shacks, you could see what they were!\n\nThe face on Mars had captivated people's imagination for years. Wheather in a movie, books, magazines, or even in the gossip magazines. Aleins creating face just doesnt seem logical enough for NASA scientists or for me. Throughout this writing I've stated multiple facts and come to the conclusion that the face on Mars was just a natural landform, and not a alien made monument. I hope that you also will come to the same conclusion yourself.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile,\" the author describes how a new technology called Facial Action Coding System enables computers to identifying human emotions. The use of this technology to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is not valuable, I believe that it is valuable like they said in the article, \"you can tell how a friend is feeling simply by the look on her face\", Just looking at someones face it is that simple to tell whether they are happy,sad, mad, or even excited. The app can recognize a students emotion during a lesson and if they notice they are confused or bored it could change the lesson to something that will catch your attention and get you working.\n\nThe reason this application is so helpful is that it can help students get focused.\"A classroom computor could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored\" with this technology it can do more than just help students, if they put these in cars and it recognized whenever the driver look sleepy or starts to doze off it can alert the driver to wake up, or it can take control for a while until the driver is awake from the alert.\n\nThis application has proved itself to be compatable, they should start working on cars which could save the lives of many just by noticing your facial expressions. If they go on start working for big brand car companies they could be the face of safety, just by the look of the drivers face the computer can alert the driver and take action immediately before something goes wrong, this is why this app is valuable.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Being a Seagoing Cowboys is a great job and you could become one too. This could be a great for you and im going to tell you a couple of reasons why I like my job and why you should join in with us.\n\nI didnt really know much about this whole Seagoing Cowboys thing but I might as will give it a try i thought so I did and once I got into this it changed my whole live and this can be you too this can change your life too. If you love animals you will love this job as much as I do. They hired me to take care of animals like horses,young cows, and mules that were shipped oversea and this could also be you. You could take care of all these animals. I made nine trips the most of any seagoing cowboy and maybe If you joined the seagoing cowboys program You could beat my record and go up to 10 11 12 or higher. But the best thing about this is when you get to travel you get to go places you have never ever in your life dream of going. You get to go places like\n\nEurope, China , Greece, and even Italy and have a good time . And you get to go on cattle boats for me they were unbelievable. But a good thing about this job was that you still get time for yourself and get to relax.\n\nThese were a few reasons why I think you should join the Seagoing Cowboys program. But being a Seagoing Cowboy was much more than an adventure it opens the world to you. And you should join you will have a lot of fun in this program Its also will open the world to you.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Can we really use technology to help us with our emotion's in life? Well I think we should have technology because you never know what the object would do to make you feel better or calm you down in a bad situation. Well technology can be very useful when it comes being lonely, sad, or bored which tecnology can support you with all different ways to make you feel better.\n\nThere are a lot professer's who are trying to test out these technology to be safe and to support them in life. Some tested on the emotions of their face expression of how to tell how they are feeling toward in life. Some also tested ways to describe how they are feeling towards that person. Some technoogy that professor's tested on was the ad's that can help with there feelings by giving them a support in life. Finally their's one more that they tested on was the human communication of how people interact with each other and at the end the technology will give some hints,or tips that will support us in a way.\n\nTechnology can support us in a way we might think it doesn't do in life, but i it will help us in life wilth bad situation,or worst senario we have trouble. This might be a chance for you to understand why technology is good instead of losing your mind,lonely,or just need some one to support you when it's hard times to deal with in life. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" is a paper that sets out to support that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents. After analyzing the paper, I am prepared to make the claim that the author fails to do so. He/she presents a vast array of information on the dangers of exploring Venus, as well as the challenges of doing so, but forgets almost entirely to argue that studying Venus is still is worthy pursuit. The majority of the essay focuses on setbacks, not rewards.\n\nThe author begins by explaining how spacecraft cannot survive on Venus long, and that previous missions have been short for that very reason. The pessimistic tone is continued in Paragraph 3, where the author describes the formidable heat, pressure, geology, and weather of Venus, and how such intense conditions would complicate research efforts. It states, \"A thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets Venus. Even more challenging are the clouds of hihgly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere.\" In paragraphs 5 and 7, possible ways to combat these road blocks are discussed. Left out of the conversation is the \"why?\" The author describes NASA's efforts to bipass Venus's problems (like designing a hovering device or considering the use of mechanical computers) but doesn't fill readers in on why such pursuits would even be worth the effort. The question, \"We can, but why should we?\" is not answered.\n\nTo say that the author was not successful in vouching for rearch of the planet Venus is not to say that attempts were not made. Paragraphs 4 and 8 make a few attempts at telling readers why researching is still a good idea. The author informs readers that Venus is of-interest to scientists because it is the most Earth-like planet in our solar system. Mentioned also is that Venus is sometimes the closest option for planetary visitation, making its exploration a more economical choice than other planets. Paragraph 8, the conclusion, says, \"Striving to meet he challenge presented by Venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors.\" Here the author is saying that Venus should be studied because we can gather information, and humans are curious. This is not science or fact-based, and is not strong because it is common knowledge, not argumentative material. If addressing why researching Venus is a worthy pursuit is supposedly one of the focal points of the 8-paragraph paper, evidence supporting it should be found in more than two places.\n\nIn conclusion, \"The Challlenge of Supporting Venus\" did not do a good job of supporting the idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers. In fact 6 out of the 8 paragraphs talk mostly about what a struggle exploration would be, and the work it would require. It focused more on giving the reader facts and figures about why studying Venus would be difficult, nearly impossible, even, but it did not thoroughly explain why such difficulties should be worked through, or why researching Venus is a fruitful and worthwhile endeavor.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The new technology is very helpful showing about whats more to a picture or a frame. Why is this important well beacuse people want to know about more about the picture or of what the picture is showing for example, Mona Lisa smile to not be so serious in the picture imagine having a cute picture but your so serious. You can change that with new tecnology. Comperters are very helpful theses days in many ways. For example it can be useful for making payments , searching up information you need , paperwork, photoshop, diffrent apps that are useful on making your life better. Its a better sorce of seaching stuff up learning more about the world and the physics. Theres more to this i mostly use it for searching up information about the topic i want to learn about. Its easier for me beacuse i dont like rreading alot and i can just look up videos instead of having to sit there for an hour looking up information or reading it beacuse reading makes me sleepy. Thats why i think the web is an awsome resorse for people that need to be informed and thought many diffrent things.\n\nMany people use this method by making there photogrophy work look better than it is. Its a very good sorce for people that have the job as a photographer beacuse they will make everything work in many ways. For example if something in the picture gets in the way the computer will show u how to get rid or it instead of doing all the extra stuff on taking a whole lot of pictures that look the same or worst. Why waist your time on doing that instead get the app or the program and get to steping its way better and easier to get pictures that are perfect.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear Mr. Senator,\n\nThe Electoral College has served us for more than a century in determining our nation's new president. \"The Electoral College process consists of the selection of the electors, the meeting of the electors where they vote for President and Vice President, and the counting of the electoral votes by Congress,\" states the article \"What Is the Electoral College?\" written by the Office of the Federal Register. This means that we do not vote directly vote for our new president, but instead vote for electors that vote for a candidate running for office. Though many individuals are in favor of keeping the Electoral College, if kept, it will continue to cause problems in our nation. Our presidential campaign will be much better if we change to election by popular vote for the president of the United States.\n\nTo begin with, the Electoral College is the cause for many issues in our nation's presidential campaign. First of all, voters sometimes cannot even control whom their electors vote for. Ergo, one may vote for an elector of our favorite candidate's party, however, we don't know if that elector will go back on his word and vote for another cadidate. The article \"The Indefensible Electoral College: Why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong\" written by Bradford Plumer states, \"The single best argument against the electoral college is what we might call the disaster factor. The American people should consider themselves lucky that the 2000 fiasco was the biggest election crisis in a century; the sytem allows for much worse. Consider that state legislators are technically responsible for picking electors, and that those electors could always defy the will of the people\". This means that the people never know if their electors are going to go back on their word and vote for another candidate. Aside from that, their is the worrying aspect of a tie occurring. If that were to happen, then the election would be thrown to the House of Representatives. The article The Indefensible Electoral College: Why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong\" written by Bradford Plumer states, \"In 1968, a shift of just 41, 971 votes would have deadlocked the election; In 1976, a tie would have occurred if a mere 5,559 votes in Ohio and 3,687 votes in Hawaii had voted the other way\". This says that if those people had just voted for the opposite person, then there would have been a tie between the two candidates. Yes, those numbers seem large, but in comparison to the number of voters that there were in those years, they're a small fraction of them. This shows how close elections are with the Electoral College.\n\nAside from causing issues in the United States, the Electoral College is extremely unfair to voters. The article, \"What Is the Electoral College?\" written by the Office of the Federal Register states, \"Most states have a 'winner-take-all' system that awards all electors to the winning presidential candidate\". That is not fair to other voters who don't vote for the popular candidate in their state; they don't receive any electors. Additionally, most candidates only advertise and visit \"swing\" states. \"Swing\" states are the states that usually determine the outcome of the election. \"The Indefensible Electoral College: Why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong\" written by Bradford Plumer says, \"During the 2000 campaign, seventeen states didn't see the candidates at all, including Rhode Island and South Carolina, and voters in 25 of the largest media markets didn't get to see a single campaign ad\". It's unjustifiable that simply because you have fewer electors in your state, you don't get to watch your candidates campaign. As previously mentioned, each state has a different number of electoral votes. It all depends on the population. For example, Texas, with a huge population has 38 electors, while Maine only has 4. The article, \"The Indefensible Electoral College: Why even the best-laid out defenses of the system are wrong\" states, \"Beacuse each state casts only one vote, the single representative from Wyoming, representing 500,000 voters, would have as much say as the 55 representatives from California, who represent 35 million voters\". Why do some states have more representatives than others just because of their population? It's not fair to the smaller states. It is true that the bigger states have more people in them, needing more representation, however, the smaller states have as much to say as the big ones. '\n\nTo conclude, the Electoral College has caused many disastorous factors in our presidential campaigns. It has caused the wrong president to be elected, and it doesn't give our citizens much of a voice in the election. However, changing the system to popular vote for the president will give people a louder voice in this nation and it will show them that the government cares about their opinion. As the article, \"The Indefesible Electoral College: Why even the best-laid out defenses are wrong\" written by Bradford Plumer states, \"It's officual: The Electoral College is unfaor, outdated, and irrational. The best arguments in favor of it are mostly assertions without much basis in reality. And the arguents against direct elections are spurious at best. It's hard to say this, but Bob Dole was right: Abolish the electoral college!\" ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Facial emotional expression technology. This is the new technology of today and is very much needed now ot say if i'm for or against it is another situationn. I mean using it might be cool to help people with depression and suicidall thoughts but using it without heir or their parent permission is not ok. So other than that I am pretty ok with this new tech. In the artical Dr. Huang tells us that \"The facial expressions for each emotion are universal\", now tht to me says alot and thats because not every emotion has a real purpose but we do as human beings need them.\n\nThis artical also gave you some education as well. Tell us some of the parts of our bodies that help with our emotions like, \" frontalis par lateralis muscle (above the eye) raises your eyebrows to show that you surprised\". I like articals like that it shows you facts and opinions as well as educational things that you should know.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Using this new form of technology called the Facial Action Coding System ,which is being used to identify human emotions, could be a good contibution to society. But, in my opinion technology that is used to read our emotional expressions would not be that valuable because there are not a lot of things we could use it for and we are capable of expressing ans sensing our feelings on our own.\n\nIf we were going to start using this technology, what exactly would we use it for?\n\nThere are not many actual reasons that we would need it. In the article they bring up how this technology could be used to tell if a politician or celebrity was lying or telling the truth. Which could be important because we would not want to be supporting someone who lies to everyone to get them to be on their side about something. Other than that this technolgy does not actually hold a lot of value.\n\nAlso, I do not think that we need technology to help tell us how we feel. We are all capable of knowing how we feel. If something makes us happy then we will smile and if something made us sad then we might cry. So, having something to tell us how we feel is kind of a waste of time and money which could be used on more important things that we need as a society.\n\nIn conclusion, this new technology called the Facial Action Coding System used to identify our human emotion does not hold any value. It may have a good contribution to some people who are not able to sense or express their feelings. But I do not think it is important enough to be used on a daily basis for certain people. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Exploring Venus\n\nVenus is the closest planet to us in our solar system, which means we should explore it. At least, that is what the author of \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" believes. However, he does not support this claim very well as he gives only one vague reason to explore it, he names several dangers and obstacles of exploring it, and provides very few actual solutions.\n\nFirst of all, he does a good job of naming the several dangers and obstacles of exploring Venus such as the extreme atmosphiric pressure. The main problem though, is the temperature wich as the author states, \"average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit,\" (Paragraph 3). This poses a problem as most metals and other materials melt at such high temperatures. However, the author fails to give very many solutions to these issues.\n\nThe author only provides two solutions to the numerous problems that he previously stated. Those solutions were to stay above the atmosphere where it is not as hot, and to create mechanical computers that were more reinforced. These solutions would be all well and good had he not brought up a problem with the first in which he states \"peering at Venus from a ship orbiting or hovering safely far above the planet can provide only little insight on ground conditions\" (Paragraph 6) thus, it is not a true solution to the problem at hand. But maybe there is good reasons to keep trying to come up with new ways to explore Venus.\n\nSadly, the author only provides one vague reason for which scientists should still try to come up with new ways to explore Venus. This reason of his is,\"It may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system\" (Paragraph 4). The problem with this is that it does not go very deep into why it being similar to Earth matters. A scientist at NASA might understand any signifigance in that statement, but an average person might not. For that reason it is a very weak argument.\n\nIn short, The author does not support his idea for exploring Venus very well because he only gives one vague reason to explore it and he names several dangers and obstacles of exploring it while providing very few actual solutions. Had he named more solutions and reasons to explore Venus it would have supported his idea far more. He named too many dangers without ways to properly combat them, which is why the author's support for his claim was weak.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Are you a student or teacher? Do you ever get bored in class, especially when the subject is something you do not enjoy? Or do you ever feel that your students just aren't grasping the concept of the lesson like you believe they could? I believe that the use of technology may be the solution to your in school problems and could help further the education system into a more personalized approach.\n\nMost students can name which subjects they like and dislike. One of the most disliked class subjects among students is math. The main reason for students not liking a subject, such as math, is because they get bored and easily distracted from it. I also have the same problems paying attention in class, which is why I believe that this new and innovative technology could help struggling students. The use of this technology could help students stay focused and pay better attention to the material being taught in class. This \"technology\" that I am speaking of is a new learning software called FACS.\n\nFACS (Facial Action Coding System) is a computer based technology that can read your emotions off of your own face. FACS uses scanning software that tracts the movement of facial muscles as you use them, so it can detect when you are sad or happy. FACS can detect many different emotions and expressions such as, happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness.\n\nMost schools use modern ways of teaching through the use of electronics. Students are provided devices in which they do most of their learning on. Some schools use electronics such as laptops, iPads, or even desktop computers. FACS could be implemented into schools through the use of these devices. All of these devices could be fitted with FACS software to improve learning capabilities in students. The student would come in contact with the software everytime he or she is learning a lesson on their school device.\n\nAt this point you are most likely wondering how exactly FACS could improve education and learning. What you may not know is how important the attitude of a student effects their learning potential. If you for example did not like the subject you are learning, or maybe you just don't like the way it is being taught. FACS could read your face to know exactly how you feel towards the lesson at that point in time.\n\nFACS could give this information to teachers and principals as feedback. This information could help teachers recognize what needs to be changed in order for students to focus more and further understand the schoolwork provided. If a student was getting bored of their lesson, FACS could have it changed or adapt it to a more creative way of demonstrating the information. FACS could give students a more personalized approach at learning. Unlike what standardized tests may make you think about the learning process, not everyone learns the same way as everyone else does. We all have different learning capabilities, strengths, and weaknesses. We all excell using different learning styles and strategies. I believe that school boards should realize this. If schools prioritized individual learning, then there would be higher passing rates on tests. Every student would be taught the information that they needed, just in a different way than their fellow classmates. FACS could help this more \"dynamic\" way of learning, so that each and every student exceeds their previous level of education.\n\nOverall the use of FACS and other face recognition software like it could drastically change the way we learn new things. It could help personalize the education system so that everyone benefits. I for one think that this form of teaching would be wonderful for schooling. I'm hoping that after reading this you will feel the same way as I do about the topic. I hope that as the reader you understand the importance of this software being implemented. I also wish that technology such as FACS will be used in the future and will be improved for even more innovative teaching tactics.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Who are voters voting for? Whoever they are voting for, it certainly isn't the president. The Electoral College has the potential to cause a nationwide catastrophe, which is why changing the election to popular vote is the best way. The Electoral College should be abolished because of the \"disaster factor\", prospect of a tie, and the fact that more citizens vote in the presidential election compared to the electoral election.\n\nThe disaster factor is exactly what it sounds like: a disaster. This \"disaster\" is described as the event where electors defy the people they are representing. For example, this happened in the 2000 presidential vote when Al Gore won the public vote, but lost the electoral vote to George W. Bush. This means that the electors voted by the people of their state changed their minds about which president they were voting for. This resulted in the opposing vote turn-outs in the 2000 presidential election. As said in Source 2, \"In the same vein, 'faithless' electors have occasionally refused to vote for their party's candidate and cast a deciding vote for whomever they please.\" Although some people may argue that it is very rare for something like this to happen, the fact that there is a chance that it could is overwhelming. Clearly, against even the smallest odds, the Electoral College can cause a catastrophe.\n\nA tie would cause a real predicament in a presidential election. In the case of a tie, the choice is given to the House of Representatives. This means that there is an unequal amount of electoral voters. Source 2 says, \"Given that many voters vote one party for president and another for Congress, the House's selection can hardly be expected to reflect the will of the people.\" Once again, the Electoral College has faulted; a simple tie could throw the whole election off. Why would the vote be passed on to the House if there is already a popular vote? If there is already another vote in place and the votes are counted, why not just put those votes to use? Obviously, if a tie could mess up a national vote, then it's time to change our ways.\n\nAlthough each state decides its electors, how many people are actually voting for the electors? According to Source 3, about one-half of the eligible American population voted in 2012's presidential election. If only half of the population is voting for a nationwide presidential election, how many people are going to vote for a small, in-state election? It isn't clear enough that although the presidential election is bigger, the electoral election is much more important. However, if we just had a popular vote instead of the Electoral College, everyone would vote in the presidential election because everyone already knows the importance of the presidential election. Yet, people aren't aware enough of the importance of the electoral vote and although the government has tried to stress the importance of voting it, nobody seems to catch on. It is evident that a large percentage of the population does not understand the need to vote in the electoral election. People simply do not understand that this election determines the outcome of the presidential election, which is why it shouldn't even exist.\n\nThe Electoral College is regarded as a non-democratic method of selecting a president. It is true hypocracy and should be replaced because of the \"disaster factor\", prospect of a tie, and the fact that more citizens vote in the presidential election compared to the electoral election. The presidential election isn't a nationwide election; it is an election that takes place in a little room where 538 electors decide the political fate for millions of people living in the United States of America. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "We need to keep the Electoral College because it keeps the elections fair. It keeps them fair by allowing the states to be proportionaly represented. Also it makes sure there will not be run-off elections and keeps the presidential candidates from favoring one region.\n\nThe Electoral College keeps the election fair because all states are represented proportianly to the population of the state. This allows for the smaller states to have a more impactfull vote on the president. Since each state is represented equally the election is more fair than if just a popular vote was taken. This system is called unfair by some because they think that their vote is not being heard. This is not true because in source one it says that when you are voting for a president, you are actually voting for who your electors are going to vote for. So if you vote say demcratic, thats a vote going toward the elector voting democratic in turn him or her voting democratic for the president.\n\nIf the president was elected by a popular vote, there is a risk of run-off elections as shown in case three when Nixion had 43 percent of the popular vote but won the Electoral College allowing for a fair winner to be elected. If we continue to use the Electoral College a clear winner will always be produces, but if we go by popular vote a run-off election can occur. Some people may say that the Electoral College is unfair because the winner of the popular vote may not win because of the Electoral College vote and that is not true. If the president was elected by popular vote he or she who is running can just go for the big states, win them over and all smaller states are left with no signifigant say in the election.\n\nIf the Electoral College was not used it would allow presidental candidates to favor different regions making it seem like he or she was just the souths president or the norths ect. So with the Electoral College it makes the candidates branch out to try and win more states that they usually would not try to appeal to. In source two the speaker says \"The electoral college is unfair to voters. Because of the winner-take-all system in each state, candidates don't spend time in states they know they have no chance winning. This statement is not true because the Electoral College forces the cadidates to branch out to get more votes. And if the runner knows he or she won't win that state why spend money and other reasources on a rewardless cause.\n\nWhen all is considered about keeping the Electoral College the only answer should be to keep it. It keeps the election fair by giving smaller states a bigger impact. It keeps run-off elections from taking place, and makes the candidates branch out to other states. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Limiting car usage can actually be effective believe it or not. While limiting your car usage you would be saving money, getting more exercise, and not polluting your environment as much as before.\n\nLimiting your car usage is beneficial because you could potentially save alot of money. Every time you need to put more gas in the car thats fifty dollars down the drain. Saving fifty dollars a week actually adds up very rapidly and be used on something you will enjoy. Instead of buying gas you can go to the movies with friends, go iceskating or even out for dinner. Money is an important role in our economy today and spending a large amount on transportation regularly doesnt sound proper. Having more money is something im sure everybody would enjoy, especially not wasting it on gas money.\n\nNot using your car is also benificial because you can get more exercise by walking or riding your bike where you need to go. Exercising is something everybody needs to do to maintain a healthy lifestyle and also staying active. Instead of driving your car park in in your garage on go for a nice relaxing bike ride. And if you dont have a bike go for a walk. People everyday are getting bigger and bigger and dont realize how important exercise really is.\n\nEvery time you use your car it harms the environment. When you start your car..... Pollution. I believe someday were going to have so many cars that all of the fumes and smoke will blur our vision when driving. During a point in time we wont be able to breath all the fumes because how strong they will be.\n\nNot using your car is beneificial to both the environment and you. So next time you want to go out park the car and go for a walk. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "If I was a scientist on Mars with somone who thought the face was formed by aliens, I think I would disagree. I would disagree because aliens are not real and why would they just made a radom face into the ground. I would say that the land in that area is just deformed. I think that it is just Mother Nature, she put it like that, that spot is a natural landform.\n\nPeople might think that aiens are real but that saying is just a myth that some people that are nerds will belive. I use to think they were real and then I figured out they weren't. If they was real then when people or NASA went to a planet or just into space, why didn't those people every see them? If they did exist why wouldn't people take pictures when they were in space of the aliens? Why don't aliens exist?\n\nIf aliens do exist do you think they would attack you if they saw you? I would think that aliens would be on earth. What would aliens be like if they were on earth? would the Earth still be the same if they was on Earth. Who would controll them if the did exist.\n\nWould aliens be in a zoo, becuse they are a weird like creture/human. people should know that akiens aren't real becuase if they were they would be on earth and people would take pictures and other things. Some could kill you other could hurt you or do other horrible things to you. That face on the ground was a natural landform it was not formed by aliens. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": ".\n\nThe Electoral College is a very contreversial topic when it comes to electing a president. Many people think it's a system that works fine, while others think it's a complete disaster. When it comes down to it, the Electoral College is a compromise between electing a president through congress and electing president by popular vote. In the past the Electoral College has caused problems in presidential elections and it can easily cause more problems that are much more severe than what we've seen in the past. America is all about democracy, so why don't the citizens get complete control by being able to elect their president directly? It's about time that the government finds a system that works better and gets rid of the Electoral College once and for all.\n\nThe Elecotral College has many flaws, a major one being that voters don't actually vote for their president, they vote for electors, and the elctors are the ones who elect the president. You may ask yourself, \"What's wrong with this? One way or another we're still choosing the candidate we want.\" While that is somewhat true, the system has many kinks that need to be fixed causing errors in the process. One example of this is the \"winner takes all\" rule. An excerpt from \"The Indefensible Electoral College\" says \"... the electoral college is unfair to voters. Becuase of the winner take all system in each state, candidiates don't spend time in states they know they have no chance of winning, focusing only on the tight races in the \"swing\" states\". At a basic level, this means candidates will only focus on some states, and giving up on others. In fact, the same article also says \"During the 2000 campaign 17 states didn't see the candidates at all...\" The facts prove it it, the Electoral College is a flawed, and unfair system, and it needs to be dealt with.\n\nAnother huge problem with the Electoral College is called \"the disaster factor\". According to Bradford Plumer, \" The American poeple should consider themselves lucky that the 2000 fiasco was the biggest election crisis in a century; the system allows for much worse.\" Plumer then explains how in Louisiana the legislature almost replaced the democratic candidates with some who opposed John F. Kennedy so that the popular vote wouldn't go to him, but rather someone else. This is a fine example of how corrupt this system can become if someone actually manages to pull something like this off. Other problems like a state sending two slates of electors to congress, or a tie in the electoral vote can happen, and there are some solutions to these problems, but why even go through them when a new system can be created altogether?\n\nPeople like Richard A. Posner argue that we should keep the Electoral college. Posner believes that the Electoral College balances the weight between big and small states. The Electoral College gives big states less electoral votes and smaller states more to balance things out. I don't see this as balancing anything. Now the smaller states have an advantage over the bigger states, so you still have the same problem you began with. Posner also argues that voters in toss up states are more likely to pay attention to campaigns, but Plumer clearly contradicts this in his article. He states \" ... seventeen states didn't see the campaign at all, including Rhode Island and South Carolina, and voters in 25 of the largest media markets didn't see a single campaign ad.\" The proof is irrefutable, the Electoral College has it's loop holes which seem fairly easy to get through. The system is outdated, it's time for a new system to take its spot.\n\nI stand my ground when I say the Electoral College should ber abolished. The people should have full control over the election of our president, and even if that's not possible, the system is very corrupt. While some still agrue that the Electoral College is working fine, the proof shows it isn't. It either needs to be renewed or replaced altogether. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "To me, driverless cars come with way too much risk. Driverless cars would put many lives in danger. The testing process may even become a problem as well. Not only that, but these cars would be super expensive, too.\n\nFirst off, cars are already really expensive as it is. Imagine having a car with cameras, sensors, and other things to help make it work. These cars would need a lot of sensors to be able to act like a human driver. That much technology in a car would make the price super high.\n\nAlso, what if something went wrong while being tested? These cars have to be tested on public roads to see if they work or not, right? A lot of people's lives would be in danger in that case. A driverless car would not be reliable in a lot of traffic or road construstion. No matter how much technology is put into a car, it will never be able to react as quickly as a normal human could.\n\nFinally, if everyone had a driverless car, people would get lazy. What I mean is that people would no longer want to pay attention anymore. If people thought the car could do all the driving by itself, they would probaby fool around and not pay any attention at all. When people don't pay attention to their surroundings, they get hurt. Like I said before, a car would not be able to react like a human could.\n\nIn my opinion, driverless cars should not be made a thing. With testing them on main roads, people relying too much on the car and not paying attention, and the price, these driverless cars are not a good idea. Although people may think there are benefits to the driverless car, there is so much more risk to them. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Luck is a cowboy and he works on a boat a cattle boat.Lucke's claims are that he helped at his anties farm. Another is that he sails the alantic and pasfic ocean . To get the cattle to the place its suppost to be . Also this was taken place when world war two happend so about in August 1945. 335 horses plus on\n\nthe cargo with hay and oats to last the whole trip . What i'm saying is I would not take the job of being a cowboy . And sailing the ocean to seal cattle . would you be a seagoing cow boy? Her are some dis claimers that you have to feed cattle. Check on the cattle every hour . Maybe get sea sick from sailing . Not being safe in the story it says that Luck almost fell over board and broke ribs. And he only got a few days off .Why would Itake a job that probly smells from house poop I woyld not like to smell like poop when im off the ship. Realy its my opinon but realy I would jump over board if they said clean the poop no i will disagree. This is why i\n\ndisagree with seagoing cowboys. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Have you ever thought about being able to read how someone feels even if they show no emotion ? In the article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\"by Nick D'Alto, new technology is being described. Many examples are given on why the new technology is helpful.The use of technology to read the emotional expressions is valuable because it helps out students,and stops the problem of having to wonder about someones emotions.\n\nThe use of technology to read emotional expressions is valuable because it helps students.\n\nIn the article it stated, \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored,\" it also states,\" Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor\". Having a computer being able to tell that a student is bored or confused allows the computer to change those emotional facial expressions so that the students enjoy learning and able to learn better.The computer may not be a human instructor but it would be able to help like a human instructor.\n\nNot only does\n\nthe use of technology to read emotional help out students,it also stops the problem of having to wonder about someones emotions. In the article it stated, \"Of course, most of us would have trouble actually describing each facial trtait that conveys happy, worried, etc.\" it also states, \"yet...studied human anatomy to help them pain facial muscles precisely enough to convey specific emotions\". Those examples show that because we have this new technolgy to allow us to read the emotional expressions,its not easier to be exact on how someone is feeling without hsving to guess.\n\nThe use of technology to read the emotional expressions is valuable because it helps students and stops the problem of having to wonder about someones emotions.There were many examples on how those things helped out.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Have you ever wanted to go to another planet like Venus? In the article \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" talks about how people should go visit Venus but there is a lot of danger in going there. The author supports the idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents by showing ways people can go there and the kinds of technology they have to look closely into Venus.\n\nIn the article it talks about the different ways why people should go there to explore and the discovery of it. In the article it says \"At thirty-plus miles above the surface, temperatures would still be toasty at around 170 degrees Fahrenheit, nut the air pressure would be close that of sea level on Earth.\" This tells us that the planet Venus's temperature would be very high for them to go there but the sea levels of the Earth would be close so the people would be able to survive in the planet. The article also states that \"However,peering at Venus from aship orbiting or hovering safely far above only limited insight on ground conditions because most forms of light cannot penetrate the dense atmosphere.\" This also shows how NASA can go the Venus by the help of the light of the Earth and help them survive in the planet. This is how the author helps support the idea that it is worth going to Venus.\n\nAnother reason why the author proves that going to Venus is worth going despite the dangers it presents is that NASA has technology where they can explore Venus more closely because of the kind of technology they have.\n\nIn the article it states \"For example, some simplified electronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating the chaos of Venus's surface and have lasted for three weeks in such contitions.\" This shows that NASA has the right technology to look closely into Venus and have lasted for three wekks very good conditions. This is how the author shows us how NASA has the right technology to explore the planet Venus and it is worthy to look closely into Venus because it's one the planets where people have not went or look closely at it.\n\nIn this article it tells us the different ways how we can go to Venus and to discoverly into it more because its one of the main planets in the Solar system. The author shows the reasons why it is worthly to go there despite the danger it has by showing the different ways we should go there and the kind of technology people have to discover the planet. People should allow this to happen because Venus is a planet where nobody really studies about it and has nobody been to it. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "the technology to read peoples emotions could back fire as well as help people. Many times people want to keep their emotions a secret to keep from concequences, or maybe they just don't want to talk about a certain topic just yet or at all. These machines could be like the next lie detectors if perfected and approved with more facial detections in the muscles to where only the slightest huge twitch of anger or fear would set it off, meaning less inaccurate sentences and more of the right people in jail. Another positive thing would be early school use, to where if the children got in trouble it would begin to sulpt that lying is useless and should just tell the truth straight forwardly. Many times this machine could be used for good purposes rather it's on the youth or older people, this could help out with many situations of the cruelest things in todays world. And with that it would be amazing and usefull tool to use in the world.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Although not having driveless cars seems more safe, Im for driveless cars. Im for driveless cars because it could be making driving more fun. Driveless cars sounds dangerous but its really safer than regular cars. The driveless car has many more good advantages than a regualr car.\n\nIm for driveless cars because it has good advantages such as there a senors that are advanced to detect and respond to the danger of out-of-control skids or roll-overs. Regular cars does have some good advantages too but driveless cars has been driven more than half a million miles without being crashed. Even though driveless cars uses half of the fuel of today's taxis, it's making driving fun in a new way.\n\nDriveless cars may not sound safe but really its safer than regualr cars. Regular cars dont have senors to tell when danger is near and reguar cars are boring. This idea would bring people out more and experience the world with a nice car. Driveless cars could be the best invention ever! ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the begening Luke have no idea that his life change after his high school gradation got two job part time job. His freind invited him to go to europe on a cattle boat. The year was 1945 August when World War 2 many countries were lefr in ruins so 44 nation join to from UNRRA hired \"Seagoing Cowboys\" to take care of thew gorses young cow and mules that was shiped overseas.\n\nIt was August 14 1945 the Pacific war has ended they got so thy head to Greace a cargo of 335 horses plus enough oats to feed them. Luke turn 18 before arriving to Greece ment military service.\n\nIt took two weeks to cross thwe Atlantic Ocean fromthe eastern coast of the United States and a moth to get to china. Taking caring for animals during the corssings kept Luke busy. It was hard work not for the dangers at sea. second trip Luke served as night watchman his job to take care of the animals every hour.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Everybody seems to be fascinated on this topic of the future cars, but if you think about it is this future transportation really what we need? Has our generation become this lazy that it has come down to this? Not to be negative, but this is not what we need this will lead to a disaster in my eyes. If this happens there will be alot of reckless accidents, because of no one focusing on the road. If these cars do come out they will have to change a few laws around as well. Also, what will happen if someone is injured will it be the drivers fault or the person who built the car?\n\nWhat were to happen if someone took advantage on not looking at the rode and didnt take the alerts seriously. Yes, I understand there will be alerts but we cannot take that chance. This idea is very dangerous and shouldnt even be recommended at all. What's wrong with just driving with your two regular feet instead of having a car doing it for you?\n\nWith these future driverless cars coming out they will have to change a few laws around. Mostly with making these cars legal in every state. If traffic laws change which they will they will have to add a few more new laws. The only reason new laws will be added in is because, they need to cover liability in case of an accident.\n\nWhat were to happen if the technology fails, and someone were to get badly injured? Would it be the drivers' fault or the person who built the car's fault? It would probaly be more of the manufacturer's fault then the drivers. First of all the manufacturer build and designed the cars basically the person driving it just bought the car. But, the driver knew what they were getting theirself into when they bought the car in the first place.\n\nThese cars would have to take along time before getting released. They are very dangerous. I wouldnt recommend at all. But, if whoever decides to get ones in the distant future has their own opinion about it. They just aren't to be trusted for all the reason above. There willl be a few consequences on getting this car. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The face on Mars was probably formed naturaly just like many Earth monuments. The eyes,mouth,and nose of the face was probably an illusion created by the shadows of the bumps.\n\nthe face on mars soon became an icon. it starred in movies,books,radios,and even radio talk shows. Some say that the face haunted grocy check out lines for 25 years. some people say that the face on mars is evidence for life on mars i dont think so I think its just a natural formation of rocks.\n\nOnly a little bit of the scientists beileved that the \"face on mars\" was an alein artifact. after eighteen long years after the vikings mission had ended they stated to not beileve that alein life exists.\n\nto conclude this essay i would say that there are many diffrent ways people could geuss on how the face of mars truly got there i would say that it was all natural and even scientists beleive that it was a natural formation.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The studying of Venus in the article is worthy persuit despite the dangers it presents. The article states \"Each previous mission was unmanned, and for good reason, sice no spacecraft survived the landing for more than a few hours\" (para 2). This qoute states that mission befor did not go well, that space carfts befor have not survived a few hours.Another qoute from the article states \"Maybe this issue explains why not a single spaceship has touched down on Venus in more that three decades\" (para 2). this qoute explaines that Venus has not been touched over three decades.\n\nHowever, Its not safe to explore Venus, the article states \"A thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets Venus\" ( para 3). This qoute states that there is not safe to explore because the carbon dioxide blankets are not safe.Another qoute from the article states \"These conditions are far more extreme than anything humans encounter on Earth; such an environment would crush even a submarine accustomed to driving to the deepest parts of our oceans and would liauefy many metals\" (para 3). This qoute says that it has way more dangers, and it not safe to land there. The article states \"Also notable, Venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system\" ( para 3). This qoute says that venus is the hottest planet ever.\n\nAlso, people have found was to explore Venus in a safe way. The article sates \"However, peering at venus from a ship orbiting or hovering safely far above the planet can provide only limted insight on the ground conditions because most forms of light cannot penetrate the dense atmosophere, rendering standard forms of photography and videography ineffective\" ( para 6). this qoute says that there is a safe way to explore Venus. The article states 'MOre importanly, researchers cannot take samples of rock,gas or anything else from a distance\" (para 6). This qoute says that there are thing that people want to see but they have to find a safe way to find them.The article states \"Many researchers are working on innovations that would allwo our machines to last long enough to contribute meaningfully to our knowledge.\n\nTherefore this eassy is telling you that people have safe ways to explore Venus. But also there is no way that you can explore the ground up close without risk. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Using artificial intelligence would never be beneifical in a teaching or learning environment. The Facial Action Coding systen could be beneficial outside of the classroom, such as customs, or locking systems. Trying to implement a learning code within artificial intelligence is impossible. Or vice versa with it teaching human beings.\n\nThe Facial Action Coding System woukld never do human benefit within a classroom. No aritificial intelligence could teach better then a human. Humans are born knowing these facial expressions and \"algorithms\" it'd be pointless to create an AI to do it. By that we'd meerely take away more jobs of the ever expanding human population.\n\nIn my conclusive opinions Its an excellent program that'd be good for graphing statistics. If those stastics be emotions overall, those stastics be ethnic graphing. The program would only benefit in statistics rather playing a human role of teaching or learning. They would never be efficient in a human learning environment. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driveless car are coming is something that should have a big debate. There are two ways to this story .Your reason why the product is good and why its not .First lets start with the bad reasons . I think driveless cars are coming is a bad ideal because , the system is not fully in stable condition for the car to be driving by its self .Next they would have\n\nto do a lot examples to make sure its stable for more than one use time .Make sure it has everything it needs to run without a person driving.I think that it should also have all the things it needs to keep\n\nfrom preventing any accidents .That should be automactically installed .\n\nI think there are some good reason driveless cars are coming ,because it a newer way to say they have improved technology in many was .This could be the next big thing in our future .It would also help our world and enviorument alot .It would stop alot of gas and pulution in the world today .It would save people more money ,we could have a healther way of get around town. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars are becoming more of a thing nowadays. They are safe and a easy way to get place to place without necessarily having to drive. They would have half the fuel cost of todays taxis and offer more flexibilty than a bus. Although google cars are becoming more popular they aren't necessasrily \"driverless\" they do still alert the driver to take over when doing things such as pulling in and out of driveways or dealing with complicated traffic issues, such as navigating through accidents or roadwork. On the plus side driverless cars are more safe than your normal everyday car, these amazing new vehicals have things such as: a video camera mounted near the rearview mirror, four automotive radar sensors, a GPS receiver, and an inertial motion sensor. So i guess you could say that these new safer driverless cars are a something to look forward to in the future.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think people should participate in the Seagoing Cowboys program because it's a fun and exciting program.\n\nThe text states,\"The cattle-boat trips were and unbelievable opportunity for a benefiy of seeing Europe and China.\"\n\nThe text also states,\"But seeing the Acropolis in Greece was special, he says.\n\nSo was taking a gondola ride in Venice, Italy, a city with streets of water.\"\n\nAnother reason to join the program is you get to learn a lot of interesting stuff.\n\nThe text states,\"Luke served as a night watchman.\n\nHis job was to check on all the animals every hour.\"\n\nThe text also states,\"But being a Seagoing Cowboy was much more than an adventure for Luke Bomberger.\n\nIt opened up the world to him.\n\nOne final reason to join the program is because if you like dangerous stuff the program is dangerous.\n\nThe text states,\"Helping out on his aunt Katie's farm as a boy had prepared Luke for hard work, but not for the dangers at sea.\n\nHis job was to check on all the animals every hour.\n\nOne rainy night, after making his hourly report to the captain, he slid down a slippery ladder on his backside.\n\nLuke's heart raced as he shot feet first toward an opening on the side of the ship.\n\nA small strip of metal along the edge stopped his slide, keeping him from flying overboard into the dark Atlantic.\n\nHe was happy to be alive.\n\nBut he couldn't work for a couple of days because of craked ribs.\"\n\nThose reasons are why you should join the Seagoing Cowboys program. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In this article the author decribes how a new technology called Facial Action Coding Sysytem enables computers to identify human emotions. I believe it is valuable because students can understand the lesson and the meaning of a topic and not just think its useless information but see it as useful information.\n\nThe software to detect these emotions with its latest innovation from Professor Thomas Huang, of the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science at the University of Illinois. Now the process of detectting these emotions is when the computer constructs a 3-D computer model of the face; all four major muscles in the modle must move like human muscles. Using video imagery, the new motion-recognition software tracks these facial movements in the real face or even in a painted face of Mona Lisa. The computer software stores similar anatomical information as electric code. This software could possibley end up in classrooms and could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored, it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor. Then students would focus more in class and become more interested in the lesson.\n\nIn conclusion this piece of software would be very valuable. It has many great uses, even for school purposes to encourage children to learn and get an education. So, why wouldn't this software be vaulable?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "(BENNGING)Luke was brave and went out to sea.He knew he might not come back but he still did it.He wanted to be a seagoing cowboy then he had to out into the sea. His friend helped him out alot so now he is a brave soilder like his friend.\n\n(MIDDLE)Luke didn't want to go out at sea at first but now he does because he is not scared because he in brave and did his job.He got to where he was going the day after the World War ll.Luke was lucky that he made it alive because the boomed cloesed to where he was going to.\n\n(MIDDLE) Luke was also brave because he wanted to go out at sea even if his friends and family didn't like it.He was very brave and now he is in the army protecting the world from danger and harm. His friend made a good choice and I would the samething if I was Luke's friend.\n\n(MIDDLE) My middle is that you can always have a friend but is that friend your true friend.If it is then you will know and they will be there to help you anything that you need help with.Just like Luke's friend helped him when he needed help the most.That is what friends are for to help out their friends who need their help.\n\n(END)That you can't do by yourself it takes two people to be friends and Luke and his friend did what they had to and they did it bravely and as a team of friendship. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Using the Facial Action Coding System to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is valuable. Just by looking at someone you could probably tell how they are feeling or thinking, and this software can do the same thing.\n\nThe article goes into great detail of how the system works. \"The process begins when the computer constructs a 3-D computer model of the face; all 44 major muscles in the model must move like human muscles.\" (Paragraph 3) The software is very advanced and able to calculate emotions just like we can through our eyes. The software has been tested on an array of different people so when if students volunteer to be the test subject for the system, it is valuable.\n\n\"The facial expressions for each emotion are universal, observes Dr. Huang, \"even though individuals often show varying degrees of expression\" (like not smiling as broadly.) Using video imagery, the new emotion-recognition software tracks these facial movements- in a real face or in the painted face of Mona Lisa.\" (Paragraph 4) This helps show that some might believe that there is no way a computer can accurately determine emotions by facial movement, the software was designed to be as accurate as possible.\n\nIn conclusion, The Facial Action Coding System is valuable when reading the emotional expressions of students in a classroom. If students consent and want to try it out, there shouldn't be an issue with the system delivering accurate results, according to the article. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Venus sometimes called \"Evening Star\". This nickname is misleading since Venus is actually a palent. In our solar system, venus is the second planet from our sun, while venus is a simple to see from the distant but safe vatnage point of Earth.The Atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets venus. Onthe planent's surface, temperature average over 800 degrees.\n\nThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration of\n\n\"NASA\"\n\nhas particulary compelling idea for sending humans to study Venus NASA's possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of venus would allow scientistic to float above the fray. NASA is working on other approaches to studying venus. Like some somplified electronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating the chaos of venus's surface and lasted for three weeks in such conditions. Striving to meet the challange presented by Venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiosity will likely lead us into many aqually intiminating endeavors. Our travels on earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the every edges of imaniation and innovation.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Today in the world everyone needs a car. A car is one of the most used and most needed appliances in the world today, but cars also cause many accidents, injuries, and fatalities. One way to avoid accidents is by allowing the car to assist with the driving. If self driving cars becomes a common thing there will be less accidents, less drunk driving, and less deaths. Many people believe that cars should stay manual to the driver because the enhanced amount of technology for a self driving car could have a glitch or have a technology fail. Although there is a great fear of this happening to the new style of car, many cars already use extended amounts of technology. The cars being created today have better, more enhanced technolgy that cause the smarter car to help everyone.\n\nThe average car made today has a great amount of technology already being designed into the car. If a self driving, smarter, car is created for the average customer the difference between the smarter car and the average car made today would be the amount of sensors. Many people may question having an extended amount of sensors in the car because the more sensors the more likely a sensor has a chance to fail. While the fact of a higher possibility of a sensor failing is true but there is already a great amount of sensors in cars today. Also, new cars being developed will have a better sensors than the sensors currently in cars. Sensors in cars today detect seatbelts, open doors, and impact of car to deploy airbags. Advanced cars around the world today already detect the surroundings of the car to help avoid crashes and improve parking. One flaw of the technology of the typical car to day is that a driver does not always comprehend or listen to signals and sensors being given by the car. In order for safer driving to occur cars must become more self dependent. Smarter cars will immediatley understand and react to the sensors in the car. Also a self reliable car will help fatigued and worried drivers. The car could automatically program routes via GPS, relieving the stress of directions. Another area of concern raised by those who oppose the smarter cars is that pedestrains will be in greater risk of harm with a smarter car if the car has a malfunction. This is a true problem, but the smarter car is not full reliant of technology. The car will still need guidance of a driver who can see pedestrians and stop. None of the cars developed are driverless, although the cars have its own sense of direction, acceleration, steering, and braking can be done by the car alone, the driver has the final decision on what the car will do.\n\nAlthough many critics oppose the idea of having a car that has so much power and freedom, the smarter car is safe and functional. The smarter car is the next generation of cars and the next great invition that can change the lives of everybody evryday. Most people who think a self driving car think that there will be no need for a driver when that is not at all true. The smarter car still requires a licensed driver but it can provide great help and security to the driver. The self driving car can do many more things than the average car which makes the new car of tomorrow a smarter car.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Going to study planet venus with standing the obstacles and problems the scientist would face, it would be really dangerous and risky, just like going to any other planet on Earth. To go there, the scientists need to get fully ready like they always do, they have to known more about the planet venus. they have to know the danger are there and the good things can be found there as well.\n\nVenus is a good planet apart from the fact that it is the hottest planet. According to the second paragraph on the second line, venus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of density and size, and occationally the closest in distance too.\n\nThe author of this essay didn't really support the idea that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.\n\nThe author seem to point his ideas to why scientist should not go to venus to study. He basically gave reasons why they should travel to venus. He talked about the disadvanges. He also explained the challenges of visiting venus. in paragraph 2, he stated, \"numerous factors contribute to Venus's reputation as a challenging planet for humans to study, despite its proximity to us\". he gave a general reason of why human should not go to study the planet Venus.\n\nthe author stated that, \"striving to meet the challenge presented by venus has value, not because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiosity will likely lead us to many equally intimidated endevours\". this qoute means that, the human curiosity will make us do more indimidated endeavours which can put us in danger. he also stated that, \"our travels on Earth and beyond should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation\". he thinks we should take less risky jouneys and stay put where there is less danger.\n\nin conclusion, the author didnt support the idea of \" Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents\", he mostly talk about not doing risky things. he taked about the good ideas of going to venus at the beginning of the ssay but he changed evrything at the end of the essay. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Facial Action Coding System enables computers to identify real human emotion. In a Mona Lisa it could read she was feeling a lot of things.This sytem would be great for social and public experiments and see if people like the idea or not. I will say I do think system is good for using in a classroom.\n\nStudents in a classroom would not give a lot of results but the same answers. Students will be bored or sleeping in class. Unless, it's a theatre,dance, or choir class and their facial expression has to change. Then that's a different topic. In paragraph 5, it explains a classs computer, \"A class computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored.\" They use the same technology but better.\n\nThey used a model to tell the six basic emotions, happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness. They also made all 44 major muscles of the model to move to get every detail. When you're surprised your eyebrpows go up and when you're angry you tighten up yopur mouth. So, in classrooms you can tell how the student feels about an assignment or a classmate's project.\n\nYou can always tell when a friend is sad or happy but never if they're lying to you or not. The FACS can tell the true emotion about the person. You can't tell if your friend is actually happy or if she's faking it just to not worry you. You can have an app on your phone to tell you how she actually feels.\n\nI think The Facial Action Coding System would be Valuable in not only classrooms but in any place in this world. You can always tell how someone feels by their facial expressions. You can walk into a room with a weird smell and you can make a face full of disgust and the person in the hallway will know what's going on. It's a valuable thing to the world. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "There are many advantages of limiting car usage . There are 3 important sources that tell us why people should limit car usage . Source 1 : In german suburb , life goes on without cars. Source 2 : Paris bans driving due to smog . Source 3 : Car - free day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota. Last but not least ,Source 4 : The end of car culture .\n\nTo begin with , In sources 1 & 2 you can tie in the two sources to conclude that limiting car usage is going on in Germany and Paris. Most people walk , ride bikes, or catch the train. Car ownership is allowed but there are only 2 places to put them in large garages at the edge of the development , where a car - owner buys a space for 40,000 along with a home ( 1 : In german suburb , life goes on without cars para 2 ). Paris decided to ban driving to clear the air of global cities. ( Source 2 : Paris bans driving due to smog para 10 ). Diesel was blamed , since France has a tax policy that favors diesel over gasoline .\n\nAs well in sources 3 & 4 Car - free day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota and cars have come to an end with culture. They feel as though when people ride bikes , and trains it can prevent car jams. ( Source 3 : Car - free day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota para 20 ).The goal was to promote alternative transportation and reduce smog. In ( Source 3 : Car - free day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota para 35 ). shows that for example van services can share services to have less cars and less gasoline . They also have a bike sharing company that you can share bikes and dont even need to use a vehicle.\n\nIn Conclusion , There are advantages in limiting the use of cars. With 3 helpful Sources\n\nSource 1 : In german suburb , life goes on without cars. Source 2 : Paris bans driving due to smog . Source 3 : Car - free day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota. Last but not least ,Source 4 : The end of car culture prove the advanges of limiting cars. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Imagine you were on an anlantic and it was storming and you were sliding down the ship but you did not fall because there was a small meatal strip that saved you from falling. That would be so scary and exciting so that why I think you should participate in the seagoing cowboys because I want you to have have great opportunity like Luke did and I want you to have lot of more expirences.\n\nFirst think of all the fun you will have. Like playing baseball and volly ball games. Also table tennis, fencing, boxing,reading,and whittling. Alot of the games you will play will pass the time.\n\nAnother reason is all the places you will be visting. Like Europe, China,and seeing the Acropolis in Greece. You can take gonda rides and see the citys and streets and water of these places you see.\n\nLast reason is seeing all this animals and feeding and taking care on them. Like seeing elhpants, tigers,and horses. The resposablitile you will learn like taking care of when they sleep, what to feed them, and to clean up after them.\n\nTo conclude you should join the Seagoing Cowboys because of the great opportunity and of all the expirences. You will have fun, you will be visting different places around the world, and you will see lot of different animals and you will have to take care of them. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Have you herd of the cowboy that rode the waves in the pacific ocean? Well if you have not I will tell you about him and his long trips. He grew up on a farm so that is why he is such a hard worker. In 1945 the war was over in urop and 44 regions came toghter to help all over the other countrys that were Europ and needed re- built. So that is when Luke comes in. His freind over in Europ invited him to try one trip. After one trip he was in love with helping people by going over sea`s and giving people cattle. He was on late night watch and it was rainy,he slipped of the latter and hit a metal pice the broke his ribs. After that in 1947 he was discharged from the boat and his duty so he went back home to the U.S.A. The war was over then and he worked two jobs. Do you belive that Luke and his freinds really rode the waves of the pacific ocean and did it six-teen times? Would go out there and go out there and do it yourself? Well I would and I would like to help others and there famly and freinds.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars are a work in progress and would be very useful in the near future. With driverless cars, we wouldn't need to drive our old gas ones. They will be able to take you wherever you want and you wouldnt have to dd pretty much anything. They would replace most human abilities with their sesnors and automatic driving. With these type of cars in developmetn, they will surely change the world.\n\nWith the sensing ability, the car would be able to sence objects around it, which it will be able to stop when there is something in the way. This is good because you won't have to do this yourself anymore. According to the passage, there will be GPS and a radar sensor; you might not have to at where you are going periodically. Since the car drives itself, there would probably be a small chance of getting lost compared to when you do have to drive yourself. For most of the time all you would have to do is sit back and relax while the car does all the work, until there is a situation where the car can't move because it can't do everything by itself.\n\nThere will come times where the car would not be able to move. This may happen when there is an accident and the car can't get around it; or when there are a lot of opsticals around like work zones. You would still need to be alert for when car alerts you to take over. This may be a reason why people might want to get a driverless car, but all you have to do is drive around the opstical or park which isn't a big deal. After you do that you wouldn't have to drive anymore. There could still be accidents when you are driving or not paying attention when you have to take over the wheel.\n\nHaving a driverless car may decrease accidents over all but they still could happen. When you are not paying attention to the car when it alerts you or driving recklessly when you do have to drive would result in an accident. In the passage it states that the car seat will vibrate to get your attention. All you would have to do is pay attention. Driverless cars are better than gas cars because there would be less accidents due to the self driving and motion/radar detection.\n\nDriverless cars would be a more better choice than the gas cars. They might cost more but you would be saving money because you wouldn't have to get gas constanly. They can take you wherever you want with you doing the driving. There would be less accidents. These are the reasons why the driverless car would be better.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "What do you think about diverless car? There are advantages and disadvantages to diverless cars. In the article \"Diverless Cars Are Coming,\" the Google cofounder, \"Sergey Brin\" envisions a future public tranportation system where fleets of diverless cars form a public taxi system.\n\nIn my opinion, i don't think the world needs diverless cars, simiply because technology is already consumed the world. Now a days everyone is on their phones or laptops doing business work or simiply being on soical media, the last thing we need are cars without divers. In the article, they talk about smart roads and binary code messages. How can you have the technology to make a road smart? Is my question. Who in the right mind would want this? It is just making the world look more and more lazy. The fact that that this is the future is ridiculous. Making driving fun is not just a way to make a new car? Its stupid to be honest. They should be focusing on making cars more safer and more knowedgeable when it comes to crashes or other emerganies.\n\nSo, Driverless cars? If you ask me they just seem like a waste of time and money. You're just making the world more lazy then what it already is. The world doesn't need cars that are built with technology to help them drive or to drive for them. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author states that Venus is the twin of earth They have a lot of similarity, but venus is closer to the sun which makes it hotter. The author wants to pursuit on researching on Venus even when we don't know what kind of dangerous things are there. I also don't know this article came out, but we coukld probably have better technology now 2019.\n\nScientists are saying that Venus is the closes earth-like planet on ur solar system, so they would think that it would be easier to send drones to Venus. The author also stated that, \"\n\nVenus was probably covered with largely with oceans.\" If thats true we haven't discovered a lot of part of our oceans. Also NASA wants to send humans to Venus and investigate for them , and Venus is far. We propbably do not have a good technology to send people all the way to Venus. i don't think that we sent humnas to Mars either. NASA could send a drone to invetigate for them.\n\nAccording to the article venus is the hottest planet in our solar system, which means that NASA has to have better technology for things not to break there. Also in the frst paragraph it says that Venus is proven to be a very challenging planet to research on. Why does the author wants to pursuite the invetigation when it said its a challenging place to examine. Again technology is gonna be super important to this research on Venus.\n\nIn the 2nd paragraph it says, \" no spacecraft survied the landing for more than few hours. Venus is a super hot planet that i said already, so the technology as to be more adavanced and stronger to stand on. We mad succesful missions on the Moon and on Mars. If NASA wans to examine Venus closely they have to get some advance tech.\n\nIn conclusion venus is the hottest planet, its also a twin to the earth. Which means it could be easier to examine, but no spacecraft had survived there for a couple of hours. It would be cool to see how mars is the twin planet of earth, and how it looks like. I would still agree with the author to pursuite the research on Venus. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Mostly everyone is aware of the so called \"global warming\" and air pollution issues we have going on around the world. Both of those are mainly caused by motor vehicles that we use on a dialey basis. Lately places around the world, like Paris and China, have been trying their very best to limit the percentages of these and the pollutant in the air by banning cars for one or more days and having citizens rely on taxis, buses, walking, bikes, etc.\n\nBecause of this, scientists have already began to prove that the percentage of air pollutant has gone down, not drastically but there is at least 9% less, which is still improvment. Less air pollutant also means healthier citizens, which is what these countries are mainly aiming for in this experiment which they call \"smart planning\". They began this study in cities to make them less denser and better for walking, now they have move their plan over to the suburbs.\n\nIn Paris they banned all vehicles with even number plates for the day and vehicles with odd numbered plates the next. Violators were fined a 22-euro($31) ticket. In Vaubban, Germany they have asked people the gove up cars and the roads a \"car-free\" zone, excpet for the tram and a few of the streets on the edge of the community. They also had large garages down at the egde of the community which were sold for $40,000 along with a house.\n\nStudies have also shown that along with physical health, citizens ahve been happier and more \"stress-free\" when it comes to not driving. one mom in Vauban said it was nice the hear the swish of bicycles and chatter of children instead of the occasional distant motor. America was a step ahead of all these other coummunities though. Their number or cars and liscense that have been given a year has a decreased effincently and is almost the same as it was in 1995. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Have you ever wonder how Venus looks like and wonder what's inside of that planet? Well in the article called, \" The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" explained some of the ideas how Venus looks like from the insde. Currently, scientists are studying about Venus by exploring the venus with scientists's meterials, such as electronic silicon. Electronic silicon is a device that can reach to Venus and explore the Venus as the scienctists controlled. In the article, it explained how worthy to explore the Venus for humans benefit. But, it also stated how dangerous is the Venus.\n\nVenus is worthy to study and it is beneficial for humans who lived in the Earth. According to the article \" The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" it clearly explained how it is worthy and useful for the sage of humans future. In the passage, it said, Venus is the nearest option for a planetary visit, a crucial consideration given the long time frames of space travel. The passage also included, Venus is very similer to the Earth we live in right now. The\n\nfeatures in Venus are the same features that we have on Earth. Accroding to scientists who study Venus, there are some possibility to live in Venus incase our Earth is destroyed. But, as there are some reasons that we can live on Venus, there are also very dangerous reasons.\n\nIt is very dangerous to live in Venus if we can possibly live in Venus. The reasons why it is dangerous is because no other humans ever live in Venus before. Also, the articel included a lot of dangerous things that can not be prevent by scientits. For example, Venus is 800 degree Fahrenheit and it is impossible for humans to live in 800 degree Farhrenheit. Even from above thirty-plus miles, it is still 170 degree Fahrenheit but the air pressure would be close to that of sea level on Earth. (Pagraph 5).\n\nIn the end, it is truely worthy to explore Venus for the sange of humen future, and hope. It will be really greatful if there is other planet humans can live other than Earth. Overall, for all of the reasons from above, Venus is worthy to explore and as the smae time it is very dangerous. I paragraph 5 in the articel, the author included a line. It said, \" Not easy conditions, but survivable for humans.\" So, it is worthy to explore Venus eventhough it is challenging. It might be hope someday.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Venus is one of the brightest planets in the sky at night. Venus's nickname is very missleading (Evening Star) considering it is a planet and it only shows at night. Venus is what you would call Earth's twin. It is the same size, and density. Although they are \"twins\" they orbit around the Sun at different speeds. The diference in speed means that Earth sometimes gets close to Mars and then gets closer to Venus, it just depends on the speed.\n\nMany people have tried to send smal spacecrafts to Venus but they but dis not survive the landing. Space sientest wonder if they can even make a spaceship land, considering it has been 3 decades since one has been on Venus. Venus's atmosphere is 97% corbon dioxide. The coulds that are there are made of corrosive sulfuric acid whitch is also in Venus's atmosphere. On the surface on Venus it is about 800 degrees, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what is on Earth, so that makes a bigger challenge to land a spaceship. Venus's environment would crush a sunmarine almost as if it went to the bottom of the ocean. Venus also has the hottest surface in the solar system.\n\nVenus has somethings like Earth. They both have valleys, mountais, and creaters.\n\nNASA has came up with the idea to make a blim[p like vehicle that will \"float\" 30 miles above Venus's landscape. Even though the spaceship would be 30 miles above Venus it would still get aroud 170 degrees Fahrenheit.They are not easy conditions but it is very possible for humans to go there. NASA is working on more ways to go to Venus and explore it just incase if the blimp idea does not work.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The ball degree of the surprise of the mission that the control went to back to the Jet Propulsion La. That the face had appeared on the their monitors but, the sensation was lived short. They figured irt was just another Martian mesa, common enough arounf Cydonia. They noted that the shadows can illsions your eyes, ears, and mouth.\n\nNASA unveiled the image that the can prove it again. The people believed that the image on the moon was a bona fire of the evidence of life on Mars. Some of the sciencetists that it was a artifact and it came a proiority for NASA. ON April 5, 1998, Mars Global Surver flew over Cydonia for the first time. MIcheal Mailin and his Mars Orbiter Camera team snapped that picture.\n\nNverless, On April 8, 2001, on a cloudless summer day in Cydonia, Mars Global Surveyor drew close enough but, it was to close for a second look. The spacecraft was at 25 dresgre to the Center. His team captured an extraodinary photo using the camera absolute maxium resolution. They pixel in the 2001 image spans 1.56 meters, that compared to the 43 metere per pixel in the best 1976 Viking photo. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Lets face the facts the face on Mars is nothing more than clever illusion. The face that you have no doubt seen on mars isn't proof of alein life it just doesn't make logical sense. The higher quality photos don't even show the face, and why would NASA cover up somthing that would help them with their budget issues. Its clearly just rock formation just like ones we have on earth.\n\nFirst of all the first picture was just a lucky happenstance. When NASA went back in to get a higher quality photo, it wasn't there. The face was just a product of clouds and outdated equipment. \"Malin's team captured an extraordinary photo using the camera's absolute maximum resolution.\" (P10) The best quality photo, and it looked less like a face and more like a pile of broken dreams.\n\nSome hardcore conspiracy theorists might say NASA was trying to pull a wool over our eyes and cover up the existents of extraterestrial life with fake pictures. But why would NASA cover somthing as earth shattering as aliens, the publicity alone would help push the government to extend their budget.\" Some people think the face is bona fide evidence of life on Mars- evidence that NASA would rather hide, say conspiracy theorists. Meanwhile, defenders of the NASA budget wish there was an ancient civilization on Mars.\" (P5) Why would litteral rocket scientists cover up something that would help the massively.\n\nThirdly it's just like rock formations we have on earth. In the article one scientist even says it looks just like a butte we have on Earth. \" It reminds me of the Middle Butte in the Snake River Plain of Idaho\" (P12) We are all losing our heads over somthing that we could drive to Idaho in a matter of hours to see.\n\nOverall only crazy conspiracy nuts could ignore the facts to this degree. Its was a one time photo that happened almost 40 years ago. People need to quit ignoring the facts and see whats right in front of them. The face on Mars is just a natural land form that, under the right conditions, can look like a face. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Computers that detect emotion would not be useful in a classroom because it would add extra work for teachers, and the computers wouldn't be immune to network problems and other things of that nature. They also probably will make mistakes in detecting emotions, and possible cause problems for students and teachers. There is also alot of contrversy on the data that computers already collect on their users everyday. With that why would parents want their childs emotional data collected and sold off to companys just to give them better ads. While there may be some good reasons for having emotion detecting computers the bad outweigh the good.\n\nComputers knowing how their users feel would cause alot of problems for society as a whole, especially if it was implemented in schools. If this new technology was placed in our schools for everyday use, there is a high likelyhood that there would be many problems with it. Dr. Huang states,\" A classroom computer could reconize when a student is becoming confused or bored. Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\"(D'Alto, 6) The idea behind this is brilliant; a computure will make class less boring and more understandable for students who may be struggling. The flaw in this logic is that teacher would have to make more than one lesson, and they would then have to put in the conditions in for which lesson the computer should give the children. This would add alot of extra work for a teacher where as if the teacher is instructing the whole class they can take a moment to clarify if students look confused, and then that is all and they can move on without having to make diffrent slides or another worksheet. Not only would the teacher have to put in more time, but the student would possibly be on a totally diffent page than the rest of the class due to diffrences in possible lessons. One other very likely problem that students will face is problems with the actual computer becasue it will lag, or they will have problems with the WIFI. Then how will the student be able to get their class work done.\n\nThere is also a lot of contrversy surronding the data that computers already collect on their users everyday. It would be safe to say that a majority of parents and gardians would not be fine with thier childrens emotional data being collected, and it then being sold off to give them better ads. Becase in all honesty children are not only using school computes for educational purposes, there are many students who are playing games, looking at articles, and in general not doing school work. There is also many times teachers tell students to look things up, and anytime something is looked up online there are ads. RIght now these ads are mostly targeted towards things that have been looked up in the past or things that have been clicked on. Dr, Huang says,\" For example, if you smile when a Web as appears on your screen, a simmilar ad might follow. But if you frown, the next ad will be diffrent.\" (D'Alto, 6) Why would parents want Google ad generation to know you child looked at a random ad and just so happened to smile? It doesn't make any sense. Also not only does the program that caught that lovely smile know, but now the people the company owning that program sold it to know too. One thing that should not be sold for profit is someones emotional data.\n\nNow the reasons that people would want emotion reading technogly in classrooms should be addressed. A student might do better in school should they be able to have a lesson almost entierly catering to their intrests.\n\nDr. Huang states,\" Then tit could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\" ( D'Alto, 6) This would mean that the student would be able to have a lesson that they understand, and that they would be interested in. This would promote more learning and better grades.\n\nThis tecnology is a bad idea for teachers and students alike to have emotion reading techonlogy placed in classroom, and there would likey be an poutcry from the public to remove them due to their emotional information being sold to companies. The bad outcomes just outweigh the positives. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.