Datasets:
Tushar commited on
Upload 3 files
Browse files- .gitattributes +1 -0
- README.md +159 -3
- neuroscore_dataset-2.csv +3 -0
- neuroscore_dataset.parquet +3 -0
.gitattributes
CHANGED
|
@@ -58,3 +58,4 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
|
| 58 |
# Video files - compressed
|
| 59 |
*.mp4 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 60 |
*.webm filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 58 |
# Video files - compressed
|
| 59 |
*.mp4 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 60 |
*.webm filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
| 61 |
+
neuroscore_dataset-2.csv filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,159 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
---
|
| 2 |
-
license: cc-by-nc-sa-4.0
|
| 3 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: cc-by-nc-sa-4.0
|
| 3 |
+
language:
|
| 4 |
+
- en
|
| 5 |
+
tags:
|
| 6 |
+
- neuroscience
|
| 7 |
+
- brain-encoding
|
| 8 |
+
- neuromarketing
|
| 9 |
+
- tribe-v2
|
| 10 |
+
- fmri
|
| 11 |
+
- neural-engagement
|
| 12 |
+
- text-scoring
|
| 13 |
+
- cognitive-science
|
| 14 |
+
size_categories:
|
| 15 |
+
- 10K<n<100K
|
| 16 |
+
task_categories:
|
| 17 |
+
- text-classification
|
| 18 |
+
- feature-extraction
|
| 19 |
+
pretty_name: "NeuroScore: Text Scored by Predicted Neural Engagement"
|
| 20 |
+
---
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
# NeuroScore: 17,175 Texts Scored by Predicted Neural Engagement
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
The first public dataset of text content scored by predicted human brain activation using Meta's [TRIBE v2](https://github.com/facebookresearch/tribev2) brain encoding model.
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
Each text has been processed through TRIBE v2, which predicts fMRI brain responses based on training data from 700+ human subjects. The output is predicted activation across 6 cortical regions of interest (ROIs), a weighted composite engagement score, and an emotion profile classification.
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
## What's in the dataset
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
| Field | Description |
|
| 31 |
+
|-------|-------------|
|
| 32 |
+
| `text` | The raw text content |
|
| 33 |
+
| `subject_line` | Email subject line (for cold_email type, null otherwise) |
|
| 34 |
+
| `content_type` | One of: ad_copy, cold_email, sales_pitch, tagline, push_notification, linkedin_message |
|
| 35 |
+
| `industry` | Target industry (for generated texts) or "unknown" (for scraped) |
|
| 36 |
+
| `emotional_strategy` | Intended emotional framing (for generated texts) or "unknown" |
|
| 37 |
+
| `source` | "scraped" (from public datasets) or "generated" (via Anthropic API) |
|
| 38 |
+
| `source_dataset` | Original HuggingFace dataset name (for scraped texts) |
|
| 39 |
+
| `reward_proxy` | Predicted activation: ventromedial PFC / orbitofrontal (desire, value, "I want this") |
|
| 40 |
+
| `attention_conflict` | Predicted activation: anterior cingulate cortex (attention capture, surprise) |
|
| 41 |
+
| `value_judgment` | Predicted activation: frontopolar / medial PFC (trust, credibility, decisions) |
|
| 42 |
+
| `social_semantic` | Predicted activation: temporal pole / STS (social meaning, narrative) |
|
| 43 |
+
| `language_processing` | Predicted activation: Broca's + Wernicke's areas (linguistic engagement) |
|
| 44 |
+
| `insula_activation` | Predicted activation: anterior insula (gut feeling, empathy, visceral response) |
|
| 45 |
+
| `composite_score` | Weighted combination of ROI scores, 0 to 100 scale |
|
| 46 |
+
| `emotion_profile` | Classification based on dominant ROIs (see below) |
|
| 47 |
+
| `brain_activation_mean` | Mean activation across all cortical vertices |
|
| 48 |
+
| `brain_activation_std` | Standard deviation of activation |
|
| 49 |
+
| `brain_activation_max` | Peak activation value |
|
| 50 |
+
| `temperature` | Generation temperature (for AI-generated texts only) |
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
## Quick start
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
```python
|
| 55 |
+
from datasets import load_dataset
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
ds = load_dataset("tusharGa/neuroscore")
|
| 58 |
+
df = ds["train"].to_pandas()
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
# Highest scoring texts
|
| 61 |
+
print(df.nlargest(10, "composite_score")[["text", "composite_score", "emotion_profile"]])
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
# Average score by content type
|
| 64 |
+
print(df.groupby("content_type")["composite_score"].mean().sort_values(ascending=False))
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
# Average score by emotional strategy (generated texts only)
|
| 67 |
+
gen = df[df["emotional_strategy"] != "unknown"]
|
| 68 |
+
print(gen.groupby("emotional_strategy")["composite_score"].mean().sort_values(ascending=False))
|
| 69 |
+
```
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
## How it was built
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+
### Data collection
|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
17,175 texts from two sources:
|
| 76 |
+
|
| 77 |
+
**Scraped (16,263 texts):** Pulled from public HuggingFace datasets including PeterBrendan/Ads_Creative_Text_Programmatic, marketeam/Marketing-Emails, Yale-LILY/aeslc (Enron email corpus), PeterBrendan/AdImageNet, goendalf666/sales-conversations, RafaM97/marketing_social_media, google-research-datasets/go_emotions, dair-ai/emotion, christinacdl/clickbait_notclickbait_dataset, and others.
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
**Generated (912 texts):** Produced via the Anthropic API (Claude Sonnet) across a controlled matrix of 6 content types × 10 industries × 8 emotional strategies (fear_urgency, aspiration_reward, social_proof, empathy_pain, curiosity_intrigue, authority_trust, scarcity_exclusivity, humor_relatability).
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
### Brain scoring
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
Each text was processed through [TRIBE v2](https://github.com/facebookresearch/tribev2) (Meta FAIR, March 2026), a tri-modal foundation model trained on 700+ subjects' fMRI data.
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
Texts were scored using the language pathway (LLaMA 3.2 embeddings → transformer integration → cortical surface mapping). Predicted activations were extracted at ~20,484 vertices on the fsaverage5 cortical mesh, then aggregated into ROI scores using the Destrieux atlas parcellation.
|
| 86 |
+
|
| 87 |
+
Processing was performed on Google Colab (T4 GPU) with batch inference, averaging 3 to 15 seconds per text.
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
### Composite score
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
Weighted combination of 6 working ROIs, normalized to 0 to 100:
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
```
|
| 94 |
+
composite = (0.25 × reward_proxy + 0.25 × attention_conflict + 0.20 × value_judgment
|
| 95 |
+
+ 0.12 × social_semantic + 0.10 × language_processing + 0.08 × insula_activation) × 100
|
| 96 |
+
```
|
| 97 |
+
|
| 98 |
+
ROI scores are min-max normalized across the full dataset before weighting.
|
| 99 |
+
|
| 100 |
+
### Emotion profiles
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
Classified by the top 2 dominant ROIs per text:
|
| 103 |
+
|
| 104 |
+
| Profile | Dominant ROIs | Count |
|
| 105 |
+
|---------|--------------|-------|
|
| 106 |
+
| mixed | No clear dominant pair | 8,362 |
|
| 107 |
+
| fear-urgency | attention + insula | 6,022 |
|
| 108 |
+
| high-arousal-desire | attention + reward | 1,521 |
|
| 109 |
+
| curiosity-hook | attention + language | 1,007 |
|
| 110 |
+
| social-aspiration | reward + social | 106 |
|
| 111 |
+
| empathy-based | insula + social | 88 |
|
| 112 |
+
| reward-driven | reward + value | 45 |
|
| 113 |
+
| trust-authority | social + value | 24 |
|
| 114 |
+
|
| 115 |
+
## Key findings
|
| 116 |
+
|
| 117 |
+
**Enron emails scored highest.** Internal corporate emails about taxes, accounting, and pay stubs outscored all crafted content. Dense with numbers, carrying real stakes, demanding action. Composite scores up to 92.3.
|
| 118 |
+
|
| 119 |
+
**Loss framing > gain framing.** "You're losing X" triggered 9.2% more activation than "You could save X." Loss framing activated both attention and reward circuits; gain framing activated reward alone.
|
| 120 |
+
|
| 121 |
+
**Specificity drives attention.** Texts opening with a number activated 40% more attention-related cortex than texts opening with a question.
|
| 122 |
+
|
| 123 |
+
**Longer text activates more brain.** Sales pitches (62.0 mean) outscored taglines (43.4) and ad copy (40.4). More context = more simultaneous ROI activation.
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
+
**Emotional strategy ranking.** Scarcity (71.7) > curiosity (70.4) > fear (69.7) > humor (68.2) > social proof (67.9) > empathy (66.9) > authority (66.4) > aspiration (65.7).
|
| 126 |
+
|
| 127 |
+
## Known limitations
|
| 128 |
+
|
| 129 |
+
**Subcortical regions missing.** TRIBE v2 maps cortical surface only. Amygdala (fear/emotional intensity) and hippocampus (memory encoding) are subcortical and returned all zeros. These were excluded from the dataset. The emotional picture is incomplete.
|
| 130 |
+
|
| 131 |
+
**Predicted, not measured.** TRIBE v2 predicts group-averaged fMRI responses. Individual brains vary. These are statistical tendencies across a population, not deterministic outcomes.
|
| 132 |
+
|
| 133 |
+
**Activation ≠ effectiveness.** High neural engagement could mean deep interest or strong aversion. The model does not distinguish valence in all regions.
|
| 134 |
+
|
| 135 |
+
**Corpus bias.** English-only. Commercially weighted (ads, emails, sales). Do not generalize to other languages, registers, or communication contexts.
|
| 136 |
+
|
| 137 |
+
**Composite score is opinionated.** The weights reflect a cognitive priority model (attention and reward weighted highest). Other weighting schemes are valid. Raw ROI scores are provided for custom scoring.
|
| 138 |
+
|
| 139 |
+
## Licensing and attribution
|
| 140 |
+
|
| 141 |
+
This dataset is released under **CC BY-NC-SA 4.0**.
|
| 142 |
+
|
| 143 |
+
Brain scores were generated using [TRIBE v2](https://github.com/facebookresearch/tribev2) by Meta FAIR, released under CC BY-NC. Generated texts were produced via the Anthropic API. Scraped texts originate from their respective public datasets on HuggingFace (see source_dataset field for attribution).
|
| 144 |
+
|
| 145 |
+
If you use this dataset, please cite:
|
| 146 |
+
|
| 147 |
+
```
|
| 148 |
+
@dataset{neuroscore2026,
|
| 149 |
+
title={NeuroScore: Text Scored by Predicted Neural Engagement},
|
| 150 |
+
author={Tushar Gautam},
|
| 151 |
+
year={2026},
|
| 152 |
+
url={https://huggingface.co/datasets/tusharGa/neuroscore},
|
| 153 |
+
note={Brain scores generated using Meta FAIR's TRIBE v2 model}
|
| 154 |
+
}
|
| 155 |
+
```
|
| 156 |
+
|
| 157 |
+
## Contact
|
| 158 |
+
|
| 159 |
+
Built by Tushar Gautam, software engineer at Ampirial (Bangalore). Find me on [LinkedIn](https://linkedin.com/in/tushargautam) to discuss or collaborate.
|
neuroscore_dataset-2.csv
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:6a9a907790ce9d60ff38048eebe52a6751e684a17b4e7eb73674b6816aa9f03e
|
| 3 |
+
size 11623882
|
neuroscore_dataset.parquet
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:8ab13c5b1ab6f5b8c59496ed69e48ef427dc462cf9d984628c11c2f9e83287fc
|
| 3 |
+
size 8190671
|