File size: 11,225 Bytes
fd39e9b 4db8703 fd39e9b ac648eb fd39e9b | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 | ---
license: apache-2.0
task_categories:
- visual-question-answering
- image-classification
language:
- en
- zh
tags:
- benchmark
- visual-reasoning
- puzzle
- multimodal
- evaluation
- generative
- discriminative
- deterministic
size_categories:
- 100K<n<1M
pretty_name: "TACIT Benchmark"
configs:
- config_name: default
data_files:
- split: test
path: "task_*/**/*.png"
---
# TACIT Benchmark v0.1.0
**Transformation-Aware Capturing of Implicit Thought**
A programmatic visual reasoning benchmark for evaluating generative and discriminative capabilities of multimodal models across 10 tasks and 6 reasoning domains.
**Author:** [Daniel Nobrega Medeiros](https://www.linkedin.com/in/daniel-nobrega-187272124)
| [arXiv paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00206)
| [GitHub](https://github.com/danielxmed/tacit-benchmark)
## Overview
TACIT presents visual puzzles that require genuine spatial, logical, and structural reasoning — not pattern matching on text. Each puzzle is generated programmatically with deterministic seeding, ensuring full reproducibility. Evaluation is **programmatic** (no LLM-as-judge): solutions are verified through computer vision algorithms (pixel sampling, SSIM, BFS path detection, color counting).
### Key Features
- **6,000 puzzles** across 10 tasks and 3 difficulty levels
- **Dual-track evaluation**: generative (produce a solution image) and discriminative (select from candidates)
- **Multi-resolution**: every puzzle rendered at 512px, 1024px, and 2048px
- **Deterministic**: seeded generation (seed=42) for exact reproducibility
- **Programmatic verification**: CV-based solution checking, no subjective evaluation
## Task Examples
All examples below show **medium difficulty** puzzles at 512px resolution.
### 01 — Multi-layer Mazes
<p align="center">
<img src="assets/task_01_maze_puzzle.png" width="400" alt="Maze puzzle">
<img src="assets/task_01_maze_solution.png" width="400" alt="Maze solution">
</p>
<p align="center"><em>Navigate through multiple maze layers connected by portals (colored dots).</em></p>
### 02 — Raven's Progressive Matrices
<p align="center">
<img src="assets/task_02_raven_puzzle.png" width="300" alt="Raven puzzle">
<img src="assets/task_02_raven_solution.png" width="300" alt="Raven solution">
</p>
<p align="center"><em>Identify the missing panel in a 3×3 matrix governed by transformation rules.</em></p>
### 03 — Cellular Automata Forward Prediction
<p align="center">
<img src="assets/task_03_ca_forward_puzzle.png" width="300" alt="CA Forward puzzle">
<img src="assets/task_03_ca_forward_solution.png" width="300" alt="CA Forward solution">
</p>
<p align="center"><em>Given a rule and initial state, predict the next state of a cellular automaton.</em></p>
### 04 — Cellular Automata Inverse Inference
<p align="center">
<img src="assets/task_04_ca_inverse_puzzle.png" width="300" alt="CA Inverse puzzle">
<img src="assets/task_04_ca_inverse_solution.png" width="300" alt="CA Inverse solution">
</p>
<p align="center"><em>Given an initial and final state, identify which rule was applied.</em></p>
### 05 — Visual Logic Grids
<p align="center">
<img src="assets/task_05_logic_grid_puzzle.png" width="300" alt="Logic Grid puzzle">
<img src="assets/task_05_logic_grid_solution.png" width="300" alt="Logic Grid solution">
</p>
<p align="center"><em>Complete a constraint-satisfaction grid using visual clues.</em></p>
### 06 — Planar Graph k-Coloring
<p align="center">
<img src="assets/task_06_graph_coloring_puzzle.png" width="300" alt="Graph Coloring puzzle">
<img src="assets/task_06_graph_coloring_solution.png" width="300" alt="Graph Coloring solution">
</p>
<p align="center"><em>Color graph nodes so no adjacent nodes share the same color.</em></p>
### 07 — Graph Isomorphism Detection
<p align="center">
<img src="assets/task_07_graph_isomorphism_puzzle.png" width="300" alt="Graph Isomorphism puzzle">
<img src="assets/task_07_graph_isomorphism_solution.png" width="300" alt="Graph Isomorphism solution">
</p>
<p align="center"><em>Determine whether two graphs have the same structure despite different layouts.</em></p>
### 08 — Unknot Detection
<p align="center">
<img src="assets/task_08_unknot_puzzle.png" width="300" alt="Unknot puzzle">
<img src="assets/task_08_unknot_solution.png" width="300" alt="Unknot solution">
</p>
<p align="center"><em>Determine whether a knot diagram can be untangled into a simple loop.</em></p>
### 09 — Orthographic Projection Identification
<p align="center">
<img src="assets/task_09_ortho_projection_puzzle.png" width="300" alt="Ortho Projection puzzle">
<img src="assets/task_09_ortho_projection_solution.png" width="300" alt="Ortho Projection solution">
</p>
<p align="center"><em>Match a 3D object to its correct orthographic projection views.</em></p>
### 10 — Isometric Reconstruction
<p align="center">
<img src="assets/task_10_iso_reconstruction_puzzle.png" width="300" alt="Iso Reconstruction puzzle">
<img src="assets/task_10_iso_reconstruction_solution.png" width="300" alt="Iso Reconstruction solution">
</p>
<p align="center"><em>Reconstruct a 3D isometric view from orthographic projections.</em></p>
## Tasks
| # | Task | Domain | Easy | Medium | Hard |
|---|------|--------|------|--------|------|
| 01 | **Multi-layer Mazes** | Spatial Reasoning | 8×8, 1 layer | 16×16, 2 layers, 2 portals | 32×32, 3 layers, 5 portals |
| 02 | **Raven's Progressive Matrices** | Abstract Reasoning | 1 rule | 2 rules | 3 rules, compositional |
| 03 | **Cellular Automata Forward** | Causal Reasoning | 8×8, 1 step | 16×16, 3 steps | 32×32, 5 steps |
| 04 | **Cellular Automata Inverse** | Causal Reasoning | 8×8, 4 rules | 16×16, 8 rules | 32×32, 16 rules |
| 05 | **Visual Logic Grids** | Logical Reasoning | 4×4, 6 constraints | 5×5, 10 constraints | 6×6, 16 constraints |
| 06 | **Planar Graph k-Coloring** | Graph Theory | 6 nodes, k=4 | 12 nodes, k=4 | 20 nodes, k=3 |
| 07 | **Graph Isomorphism** | Graph Theory | 5 nodes | 8 nodes | 12 nodes |
| 08 | **Unknot Detection** | Topology | 3 crossings | 6 crossings | 10 crossings |
| 09 | **Orthographic Projection** | Spatial Reasoning | 6 faces | 10 faces, 1 concavity | 16 faces, 3 concavities |
| 10 | **Isometric Reconstruction** | Spatial Reasoning | 6 faces | 10 faces, 1 ambiguity | 16 faces, 2 ambiguities |
Each task has **200 puzzles per difficulty level** (easy / medium / hard) = **600 per task**, **6,000 total**.
## Evaluation Tracks
### Track 1 — Generative
The model receives a puzzle image and must **produce a solution image** (e.g., a solved maze, colored graph, completed matrix). Verification is fully programmatic using computer vision:
| Task | Verification Method |
|------|-------------------|
| Maze | BFS path detection on rendered solution |
| Raven | SSIM comparison (threshold 0.997) |
| CA Forward / Inverse | Pixel sampling of cell states |
| Logic Grid | Pixel sampling of grid cells |
| Graph Coloring | Occlusion-aware node color sampling |
| Graph Isomorphism | Color counting + structural validation |
| Unknot | Color region counting |
| Ortho Projection | Pixel sampling of projection views |
| Iso Reconstruction | SSIM comparison (threshold 0.99999) |
### Track 2 — Discriminative
The model receives a puzzle image plus **4 distractor images** and **1 correct solution**, and must identify the correct answer. This is a 5-way multiple-choice visual task.
## Dataset Structure
```
snapshot/
├── metadata.json # Generation config and parameters
├── README.md # This file
├── task_01_maze/
│ ├── task_info.json # Task parameters
│ ├── easy/
│ │ ├── 512/ # 512px resolution
│ │ │ ├── puzzle_0000.png
│ │ │ ├── solution_0000.png
│ │ │ ├── distractors_0000/
│ │ │ │ ├── distractor_00.png
│ │ │ │ ├── distractor_01.png
│ │ │ │ ├── distractor_02.png
│ │ │ │ └── distractor_03.png
│ │ │ ├── puzzle_0001.png
│ │ │ ├── solution_0001.png
│ │ │ ├── distractors_0001/
│ │ │ │ └── ...
│ │ │ └── ... (200 puzzles)
│ │ ├── 1024/ # 1024px resolution
│ │ │ └── ... (same structure)
│ │ └── 2048/ # 2048px resolution
│ │ └── ... (same structure)
│ ├── medium/
│ │ └── ... (same structure)
│ └── hard/
│ └── ... (same structure)
├── task_02_raven/
│ └── ...
└── ... (10 tasks total)
```
### File Naming Convention
- `puzzle_NNNN.png` — the input puzzle image
- `solution_NNNN.png` — the ground-truth solution (Track 1 target)
- `distractors_NNNN/distractor_0X.png` — 4 wrong answers (Track 2 candidates)
### Statistics
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Total puzzles | 6,000 |
| Total PNG files | 108,008 |
| Resolutions | 512, 1024, 2048 px |
| Difficulties | easy, medium, hard |
| Distractors per puzzle | 4 |
| Dataset size | ~3.9 GB |
| Generation seed | 42 |
## Usage
### Loading with Hugging Face
```python
from datasets import load_dataset
# Load full dataset
ds = load_dataset("tylerxdurden/TACIT-benchmark")
# Or download specific files
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
puzzle = hf_hub_download(
repo_id="tylerxdurden/TACIT-benchmark",
filename="task_01_maze/easy/1024/puzzle_0000.png",
repo_type="dataset",
)
```
### Using the Evaluation Harness
```python
from tacit.registry import GENERATORS
# Regenerate a specific puzzle (deterministic)
gen = GENERATORS["maze"]
puzzle = gen.generate(seed=42, difficulty="easy", index=0)
# Verify a candidate solution (Track 1)
is_correct = gen.verify(puzzle, candidate_png=model_output_bytes)
```
See the [GitHub repository](https://github.com/danielxmed/tacit-benchmark) for full evaluation documentation.
## Reasoning Domains
The 10 tasks span **6 reasoning domains**, chosen to probe different aspects of visual cognition:
1. **Spatial Reasoning** — Mazes, orthographic projection, isometric reconstruction
2. **Abstract Reasoning** — Raven's progressive matrices
3. **Causal Reasoning** — Cellular automata (forward prediction and inverse inference)
4. **Logical Reasoning** — Visual logic grids
5. **Graph Theory** — Graph coloring, graph isomorphism
6. **Topology** — Unknot detection
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{medeiros_2026,
author = {Daniel Nobrega Medeiros},
title = {TACIT-benchmark},
year = 2026,
url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/tylerxdurden/TACIT-benchmark},
doi = {10.57967/hf/7904},
publisher = {Hugging Face}
}
```
## License
Apache 2.0
|