diff --git "a/test.json" "b/test.json" new file mode 100644--- /dev/null +++ "b/test.json" @@ -0,0 +1,4697 @@ +[ + { + "sentence": "since when has religion been pragmatic or based upon systems that works?Obvious answer: never.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "perhaps. but which would you rather have: promiscuity without protection or with? the distinction can matter, so if there is going to be promiscuity going on, i for one would perfer to see it be safe-sex, as much as possible. but even better would be if a person not being promiscuous at all, imo anyway.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Will the Catholics ever elect somebody who is not a complete knob? He speaks just like he knows something about gay relationships. emoticonXRolleyes", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "The deafening screech of moving goalposts. DC is not the argument here. YOU claimed the following: You were wrong. Eat your crow like a good little boy.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "it is silly to focus on the tools and not bad people who misuse these tools, especially when the tools in question can be easily smuggled as well as made in a modestly-equipped machine shop. also, why do many of those who supposedly have a political orientation that favors freedom and opposes tyranny want to severely and arbitrarily limit the rights of tens of millions of people who have not, and show no indication of wanting to, unjustly hurt anyone with these tools? it is wrong to tell people that they cannot put certain substances in their bodies and have abortions, just as it is wrong to tell people that they cannot have certain precision-machined metal/polymer/wood objects in their own homes.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "dear downvoter: if you disagree with my argument, why not actually argue against it? do you assume you would lose?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "But it is based on history. There is plenty of history showing that women had illegal abortions. Or, if their families had money. went to Costa Rica or Britain to have a legal one in those countries.Women died or had severe medical emergencies due to illegal abortions. Doctors and nurses were prosecuted for providing these services.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "i'm surprised that 'the sixth sense' didn't make anyone's list. the twist at the end totally caught me off guard and blew me away. i also like forest gump, slingblade, platoon, top gun, the wizard of oz, shawshank redemption. there are more but it's monday.... :p", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "How the heck does darwinism get one out of poverty????I think you are generalizing by lumping ALL education into the specific areas that some religious conservatives oppose. If they opposed getting degrees, going to grad school, etc., I could see your point. But I don't know of any religious sect that opposes that.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "hehe.. Three negations in one sentance tammerlain? emoticonXWow :p \r\nBTW, do you know why portent is down?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh yeah and then there is renegade by the styx... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iby32fcvtvs", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "I'm sure it is many a doctors' spiritual duty to relieve suffering, just as Jesus healed the sick. Besides, who wants to go back to 40 year average lifespan, like they have in Afghanistan? Not me.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "did you not say, 'these people need to be stopped?' or was that still part of the article? if that was you, then that is a viewpoint that, if implemented, will directly influence public policy. you say you do not want to make this country a theocracy, right? well, do you want to make it/keep it a non-theocracy? if so, you are trying to extend/keep an ideology imposed through government. i'm not saying that is bad; i am only saying it is what it is.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "not that i was interested in joining them, but i did read the two links. i'm not much surprised that science has nothing to do with it...and not at all surprised that many actors are into it...hollywood has long been known to generate kooks. i suppose they are just a small portion of the total, but they are very publicized.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "you sure fooled me about that! well, actually, i have. it's no more than a restatement and expansion of previous points i've already made. well, you'll have to forgive my occasional rhetorical flourishes and hyperboles. not a few religious believers have exasperated me as total xxxxxx, but i do realise that not every believer in a religion is a total idiot... ;) that is a 'simple fact'? it doesn't seem so very simple to me, and i am not sure how you would establish it as a fact. but yes, i accept that most theists assume their god is eternal and not limited by the natural laws that limit them. i'm just dubious how rational an assumption it is.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "doesn't that depend on exactly what israel is doing? you can't treat the country as a whole in everything. do i support some of their actions? no. do i oppose some of their actions? no.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well it could mean simple instinct, and I think you will find it was only applied to animals with brains. EAM attributes \"intelligence\" even to bacteria and to corn plants, trees, jellyfish, single celled eukaryotes etc. If one is to consider intelligence the main driver of adaptation it must be omnipresent in living organisms - there is zero support for this concept.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Who has ever made this claim? Please, show me, because I have never once heard it. Of course most individuals are physically capable of producing offspring. Natural selection is dependant upon which individuals will pass their genetic information on to the next generation, and that is determined by at least two factors that I can think of at the moment: 1.) An individual being able to survive long enough to find a mate, and 2.) Actually being able to find a mate and produce offspring, which brings me to my next point:", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "It is difficult to reconcile evolution with Christianity - as far as I see.\r\n \r\n Evolution excludes God.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "but aren't the exchanges primarily aimed at those who can't get insurance otherwise? i would have thought that if insurance was so little used by young people, insurers would be keen to get their business, and premiums would be low. maybe insurance is more necessary for young people than you think?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh yes, i see your point. and strictly speaking i suppose it is true. it is more of a language inflection issue. when you say people only have value for me to use them, it translates to me as if i only value people that i can use. when i talk about using someone, i mean the process by which you manipulate them to achieve your own goals with no regard to them or their well being. this is not how i treat people, and not the only requirement for me to value a person. it is true that i only value people to the extent that they enrich my life, but the ways in which they do that are many, varied, and very different. so yes, i understand what you are saying, i interpreted it in a different way is all.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "EZ. That is not what I said.I would think a Bible website would be good for biblical information, but for archaeological information? not so much.If you want to provide archaeological evidence of the Exodus, why don't you seek out information from an archaeology sources? Please answer this.If I wanted to seek archaeological evidence to confirm something that happened to a people that was written about in their ancient writings, I wouldn't seek a specialist in the ancient writings as a resource, I would seek an archaeology expert. Doesn't that make sense?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "What other theories? Why mention them if you aren't going to explain them? You are actually on a board of education? I notice there was no mention of telling kids that there are other theories of gravity and that all of them have holes. Evolution is a more secure theory than gravity.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Then what's Mississippi's problem? They must be run by a-holes because they are being forgotten.\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "That's not entirely true. For example, a country that isn't already saturated with, say, handguns, would imo greatly suffer if handguns were suddenly legalised. Banning handguns in a country that is saturated already, is imo, idiotic.\r\n \r\n -Wez", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "A rifle! No self-respecting liberal would have a rifle!\r\nNot a liberal threat against Bush.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "assumption of 'millions'. they must of because how else can we account for the species today ? got any support for this ? i can prove the antidiluvians knew about and used pi. if man began as an ape/animal then how do you explain the fact that pi was not discovered until thousands of years later ? ray m.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Bet the crime rate skyrockets,but I wonder what happens if you (officers)just\r\n put a bullet in them, you know for resisting arrest?\r\n \r\n Who does that pinhead mayor remind you of?emoticon_rolleyes", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "will you explain and cite references on how that will happen due to their plans? another difference that obviouschild pointed out in another topic is that mccain's plan will add another 5 trillion to our national debt whereas obama's will add 3.5 trillion. deficit increases - will mccain's or obama's tax cuts increase the national deficit more? factcheck.org: a new stitch in a bad pattern", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "How about other religious theories. What about teaching about the sun god? I don't mean that they believed that, but teach it as a choice because everyone deserves the right to choose in what they believe. Actually let's also teach how the theory of gravity could be wrong and people can choose to believe that invisible fairys pull people down towards the Earth and other massive objects. We should teach the theory of gravity also but we need to give them the choice on what to believe.\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "well, you ignored the part where i said 'voting'. but imo legislative solutions are part and parcel to popular appeal because legislators are voted in on that basis. any legislator claims to 'do what's right.' so elections tend to be popularity contests. and legislators tend to want to keep their constituents happy. oh and just to make sure you understand this kronos so as not to get off in the wrong direction, this is my opinion, just like everything else i've said. it is not a lie. how is that even relevant? i never claimed it was a first resort.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "There are no objective reasons to condemn gays. Marriage is not a matter of state and so it is meaningless to argue whether a state should recognize it.My advocating of perfect liberty allows no contradictions or exceptions, believe me I have lost alot of support from conservatives for this, perhaps even gays if one really applied it to all extremes.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yes, but what I meant about the legislature passing it is that the legislature could fund it. If there is funding, it becomes a funded mandate. As I've said in the past, though, whether it is classified as an \"unfunded mandate\" or not does not suggest that same-sex marriage is wrong or right.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "OOOHH!! Such ANGER!!!emoticonXAngry\r\nWhat is it about you righties that impels you to resort to ad hominem attacks on those whose opinion differs from yours?emoticonXKill\r\nMust be that your quiver quivers for the lack of the arrows of substance.emoticonXAngel", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "actually some did talk about the complexity of life as well as irreducible complexity even though it may not be mentioned in the title", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And the follow-on that Archie throws out there demonstrates his ignorance on the subject.Such laws DO NOT just protect homosexuals.They protect EVERYBODY from being fired just cause they are gay OR straight (or bisexual or nonsexual).It protects the straights just as much as it protects the gays.It has nothing to do with \"better than\" or \"superior\".If people like Archie understood legislation like ENDA, they wouldn't try to make such an absurd allegation! emoticonXEmbarrassed", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "dear terry here, please see my post on the other side of this debate. you may think that nothing happens after you argue a debate, but that is just the start. so much more happens after a debate is created and argued. people around the world look at the debates and learn from them, make decisions because of them and create additional debates. your input can change the world. andy", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "But faith is not religion. Religion is the expression of belief in a god or higher being or power of the supernatural.As an agnositc I think that both theists and atheists are wrong since it is impossible to know for sure wheither a god exists or not while one is still alive.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "There are ideals in this world that are better left alone.....lines that should not be crossed. Marriage is an ideal that does not need changing; doing so is crossing that line in the sand that was drawn there for a reason.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "there is the problem the lack of civilized societies are well.. when you find one come tell me.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "What has this got to do with the non-material world, of which God and you and I are a part of? I know that the Apostles witnessed God's miracles. I too am witness to God's miracles. The evidence is adequate for me and for much of the world's population..", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "just print out your own posts, my dear james. they'll say it all for me! emoticonxangel", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Funny but if the censors ever removed all of your insults then none of your posts would remain. Then we'd have to import comic relief.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Do you think that red herrings and strawmen will help your case? ;)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "i don't follow. 'since those of specific faith...' ???? if you don't believe god, then there is no sin. those that do would choose neither of the above over another. of course, there are some here that would, but that's religion for you.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "So then the handgun ban did absolutely nothing. Nice to see you could finally admit the truth.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "israel promises war if iran is allowed to develop nuclear weapons. that israel already has them is, of course, fine with the us. that pakistan, not exactly a pillar of stability, has them is not an issue. after what the us did to iraq i'm surprised every me country doesn't want nukes. but we'll continue the game on israel's terms and all cope with suicide bombers.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "After reading that I had to go talk to Ralph on the big white telephone.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Thanks, Clive, you're a good sport. Of course I can't agree with the idiot part. Rash, unwise, unknowledgeable, maybe, but not fools.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Here come the Christians, thinking they can know everything by guessing, and commiting the genetic fallacy left and right.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I am here right now brady. Doesn't look like you are doing so well. All of your claims and propaganda points a simmering ashes just like your .org soon will be. Have you got any useful skills so you can make a living? emoticonXHoho", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "so is matthew your friggin' loon! are you really that far gone that you can't see the point that everyone here is trying to drill through that thick brainwashed skull of yours? all any of your posts boil down to is 'i'm right because i can't be wrong'. what utter bs. and the sad thing is, you have absolutely no idea. you are utterly incapable of viewing things from another perspective. you can't even understand the possibility that there is another perspective.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Because violent crime and violent criminals is something that I can't control. Heart disease, that can be worked on with good diet, exercise and medicine if necessary. It's manageable, controllable and can be avoided. You can't do that with a violent criminal.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "That has nothing to do with acknowledging or not acknowledging facts.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "More likely the criminal will shoot first rather than give the other chap a chance. There is no real reason for the average citizen to need or have a hand-gun", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Not even for the sake of argument? Are you that limited in your debate skills? You and jyoshu?\r\nThat's really sad.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "well, who was the head of fema appointed by? a brief googling seems to suggest a mr. g.w. bush was responsible, it wouldn't be entirely out of the question for dubya to appoint another member of the christian right to this permission, who might be keen for christian charities to be promoted. other possible reasons are that religion is very strong in the south, and hence religious charities are more likely to have resources in the south, were the problem is. in any case, the red cross is by far the largest organisation involved, and as has already been estalbished is secular. and as i said before just because the organisations are christian doesn't necessarily mean that their workers or contributors are.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "wow what an awkward discussion. there is obviously no reason to sterilize when they are sexually retarded as opposed to mentally retarded and even then mentally retarded can have non mentally retarded children and some of them are able to take care of their offspring depending up the severity of their condition.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "that means his life was aborted to. i guess you don't know what goes on during an abortion. it's a pretty gross process.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yes. I would. :) [As long as I can exercise 'critical thinking', along the way w/out personal attacks.]", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So, you're basically saying that Biden was lying through his teeth when he said he doesn't support gay marriage? It was all just a lie to keep from losing votes? Interesting.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "No one is saying alcohol is either...I would say both are not smart to use often...however, one beer is still better then smoking a bowl.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "winston dearie before you decide to go flapping your gums at me over something you don't like i'd suggest you take the test first and see for yourself. the pictures are extremely stereotyped to the point of being racist caricatures that were popular in the early half of the 20th century.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "i never said energy is going to cease to exist. if energy stops transferring, it still exists, its just not doing anything is the 'life force' energy? thats the question. from a physics perspective, can life be measured in joules? lol quantitatively, can one person have more life force than another? can you lose, gain or recharge your life force? like video game characters... is life itself physically definable? yes it exists, but can it be defined as a tangable entity or describable by physics?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "And if we can actually doing anything about it. From what I hear on the fringes, the debate should not be about how to change or stop it, but how to change to deal with it and what we should expect as society adapts to a change in climate.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Looking for an opportunity to shoot a gun control advocate while being protected from prosecution by the castle laws in your state? Not happening....", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yeah, ok, keep up with your \"Creationist\" therory and I'll stick to my much more believable idea of \"Evolution.\" Keep your religion out of MY Government!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "we could make this a little contest i suppose and see who gets the most right. for the primary categories anyway. picture, acting, directing, writing, any others? also definitely say what you think will, and what you think should.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Who is Allah, Alex? Great, I'll take 'things a terrorist god would do' for $1600 Alex.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "seven demons, huh? is that a lot? small chance of clean living with those guys on board, huh? interesting. i am intrigued that you believe in demons. do they still exist? if so, how are they manifest and how would you know that?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Actually, it's not conjecture. The genetic makeup of the several subspecies of arctic foxes bear it out. The dominant allele is rare because it is less adaptive. The dominant allele is most likely ancestral. But even foxes below the Arctic circle show differences in their fur between summer and winter. So yes, foxes that were able to change color in the north had a differential reproductive advantage over those who couldn't.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So Lewontin is the person who determines the opinion of the general public or something?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I don't think we have any business forcing anyone to do something they don't want to do. The father is supplying his DNA when he engages in sexual relations. After than point he has in effect signed a blank check. It's like the old saw, if you don't want to do the time, don't do the crime. Fathers to be shouldn't be engaging in sex unless they intend to pony up with the montly check. I come from a bit of a bias on this subject because this was my area of endeavor for some 20+ years.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Wow BIOLOGISTS have been working on strteches of DNA of previously unknown function and found what they went looking for - function. That sure knocks genetics and evolution off its feet. Yep no question about it at all. Darwin will be trashed when junk DNA is explained, all his predictions about junk DNA being functionless will be falsified. Oh, oh wait a second. Darwins theory and the NDS make zero predictions about \"junk\" DNA! Guess that if one has nothing to falsify then falsification is pretty unlikely.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yep, Martha is in trouble and the democrats are panicking. \r\nI think the strong Independent support for her opponent is due to Martha's own lack of appeal. \r\nBy they way, I have to ask....since \"The anointed one\" was in your neck of the woods, did you get a peek at him? prehaps even wave at him (with all 4 fingers) ;)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Did you slip in it AGAIN? Were you led astray by a passage from Heller you thought you could use to legitimize gun control, your wet dream?I submit from many past rulings of the courts that little statement is in error.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "don't you insult african americans! i have posted a number of times links and comments by prominant black leaders who infact do support gay marriage. when will you stop your 'don't insult african americans' lies when you know all too well just how wrong you actually are? oh that's right...never, because you just don't care what anyone thinks if it at all differs from your opinion. weren't you spanked enough in the 'banned people' forum?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "i am amused by how some people can look at an article of an anti-gay marriage advocate attacking a gay marriage advocate, and the person reading the article wants to focus on what qualifies as 'oppression' and how gays could have it worse... emoticonxdonno just out of curiousity, do you have any comment as to whether or not the attack was wrong?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "having been raised in texas as a child and teen, with many relatives still residing there, i'm surprised their educational system hasn't gone to the bible as its primary textbook. perhaps things have changed, but fundamentalist hypocrisy was at one time the law of the land in texas. maybe since texans are no longer served by oklahoma and louisiana bootleggers the fire and brimstone circuit has relaxed, but i'd find that difficult to believe as religion is a very effective control technique.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Wow, Archie, thanks for the laugh!\r\nAnd you DON'T speak of what you hope and want when you talk? You do not know, any more than us, what the truth is. However, we very easily DO know that your god is not Jesus Christ, as we know you by the fruits of your actions and statements.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Ha, that is just an idiotic perspective. We'd have no laws (and many important ones) if you can't make a bill that doesn't affect you. Sorry Civil Rights legislation!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "What's Sesame Street?... Oh wait that's where you got your pathetic education isn't it, no wonder you're so ignorant. ... emoticonXChickenemoticonXChicken", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Simple. The big government people will tell you that it's in everybody's best interest. The criminals will just kill you without debate.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Maybe you are having trouble with the concept of \"low premium, high deductible\". That means the monthly payments (premiums) are low, and the deductible is higher (cost you actually pay for services). This shouldn't be a problem. How often do you actually use your health insurance? I use mine very rarely (not at all in the last year). It appears that what Bush is trying to do is get insurance coverage to low income folks without a multi trillion dollar price tag (like kerrys plan carries). This isn't a bad thing, and I am not even a bush supporter.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "how could you?! :'( all i wanted was to contribute to a fantastic community of geniuses!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "You benefit from all of these. They may not be direct benefits or even benefits you want but when it exists we all benefit. Frankly, the IRS is just an idiotic one. Your whole argument only works if you have the IRS to enforce these policies. Could we go without SS and Public education? Probably, but I prefer a system where society decides on what is a \"public good\" and we go with that.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "So, in order to be against gay marriage, a person has to be faithful in his own marriage? Gimme a break. He supports what his constituents want him to support or he doesn't get elected. In case you haven't noticed, the majority of Americans are against gay marriage.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "At what cost? How many civil rights are you willing to give up in the name of a few less murders each year? Are you perfectly willing to be stopped by the police on a block-by-block basis and forced to show identification and traveling papers, all the while the officers on location are pointing their guns right at your head, ready to XXXX you away at the first sign of a twitch or if you display even a hint of hesitation to comply?How desperately do you crave a police state? How much do you favor a nationwide curfew where violators can be arrested by the police and held without legal counsel for an indefinite period of time? Do you favor the use of physical and mental torture to force convictions even from the innocent?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "A woman's right to choose to keep her legs together is not in any way abridged by this bill. Ho, ho,f***ing ho.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Uhhhh, I just said that I DO JUDGE! So what in the hell are you talking about? You're not well. I didn't bother to adress your points about slavery because there's no point. I disagree with your claims as I suspect would most historians. But it doesn't surprise me that Christians would try to claim that they ended slavery since they also try to falsely claim they founded the country.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Apparently in Marc9000's small, small, small world, if you're not a Christian, you're a atheist. \r\nThus over 4 billion people are atheists. emoticonXAgree", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well, you know what happens when they try to eliminate waste. The opponents start screaming that the government is \"rationing\" health care. In any case the inclusion of the 40 million uninsured wil be financed mostly by waste elimination. At least it is a start. The status quo is untenable. The essential point here is that the universal healthcare systems in Europe, Japan and Canada deliver MORE healthcare for less money. It is not the case that in Canada, healtcare is in short supply because the government is rationing it. They are ahead of us in all metrics except waiting time for non-essential surgery. One example is the waiting time in emergency rooms as some of us have actually experienced. We may not be able to achieve the same efficiency overnight but we have to stop putting our head in the sand.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "does that matter? isn't it obvious? you get your friends to vote you for and it allegedly makes every single one of our failures in the debate no longer matter. exoneration through popularity. quite stupid really, but what can you expect?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Has the American Medical Association decided to recognize that aluminum, steel and polymer and addictive narcotic substances that can drastically alter a person's mental status?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "didn't texas sign it into law a while back that if 3 or more people can identify you as the one who committed the crime that you get no appeals, and go right to the top of the list to be executed? i think this should be the case in every state. while many cases do deserve appeal, many do not. if we got rid of appeals cases on indisputable crimes, we would save quite a bit of taxpayer money.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "LMAO and where has been your outrage at GOP politicians cheating? Ensign, Bart Stupak? \r\nCOME ON LMAO!!!! Your hypocrisy is so damn funny Easilyridden! REPENT!!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "yeah your the other bright guy who keeps spouting off opinions but never states facts. the media constantly puts out reports against bush, not to mention any republican. do you remember the biggest joke in political history grey davis?? the media thought he was a god, even after we booted him the hell out. start giveing facts, i could really care less about your uneducated opinion", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "We know this because the kids destroyed all the interactive exhibits within a day when the Earth Gallery opened. I for one was most upset as I'd been wanting to have a play too emoticon_cry", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "That's EXACTLY the point. Regardless of whether or not human minds think differently, whichever mind produced and agrees that 2+2=4 is absolutely correct, the rest are wrong. We know this because we can observe and test the concept in the physical world and prove that it is true. This goes for just about anything, dissention in the face of facts does not change the facts.IMHO, this invalidates your claim that something produced in the human mind is not absolute due to some human minds being contradictory.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "why would it be immoral to lie to your child about santa clause? wow. you really are bad at this.... you're presupposing your position that harm is what is immoral. if the lie is to a person the person is the victim of that lie. you're presupposing your position..... you said that a victim is one that has been harmed, then you say that lying makes one a victim, but then you say that lying to your kids about santa is not immoral? i'm done with you.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "So you disapprove of what these gun owners are doing? It's encouraging to see someone on the progun side who can think for themselves and recognize when other people on their side are doing wrong.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yea the legalizatioin of drugs would cause an epedimic of problems. Crime, suicide, mental health problems, and physical health problems.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "i just like the author...i'm surprised a single person even knows who he is with the level of society's litterary intelligence. emoticonxsmilie", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Cool I want to be free of the regulation that I wash my hands before preparing other peoples food. After all it should be my choice to wash my hands after going to the restroom and I should be able to make that choice without restraint. In your world there are no courts, police, or governments to hold me accountable for killing someone or giving them hepatitis.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well you wouldn't have to 5hit yourself everytime you walked down the streets if you had a gun yourself.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And he's out! By the way, why did you say \"strike III\" and not \"strike 3\"?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well then this doesn't answer my question.If you have 10 doctors for 100 people (this is just an example) and only 50 of them have health insurance and each doctor gets paid $100 a year then your health care per capita is $10 ([10doctors x $100]/100 people). If you change it to 100 people with health insurance you now have $10 per capita as well because you population did not change. Health care costs are shown per capita and not per person insured: Per Capita Health Expenditures by Country, 2007 — Infoplease.comSo again, if you go from $6,000 per capita per that website given above to say Switzerland levels at $4,100 per capita then where did that money come from?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "City council vote only, not sure about public sentiment, but from what I gather, most people don't care because they don't own guns. Whenever an issue like this comes up, people who are interested seem to become the loudest, both the pro- and anti-gun crowds.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Banning abortion is a tool with which to punish women you deem promiscuous or immoral and recreate through a police state a mythical golden age of christian virtue, got you. The rest is just a cover story in the same way biblical creationists who want their religion brought into the school system advocate \"intelligent design\". They call it \"lying for baby Jesus\".", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Why is saying that many things conflict with the well being of Society at large and bans them to the disappointment of those who endorse such activities. Consider rape, murder, incest and sodomy as good historical examples of such taboo activities, taken by you as an inditement of all gay people JSD ? You seem to take any moral stance or argument I make very personally, as if I'm accusing you of being those things. You work very hard to read into, demonize and condemn everything I say as if it is intended as a personal attack. You really need to work on that.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "But I already pointed out the mark of Cain in another thread. http://www.4forums.com/political/sho...57&postcount=1 You see, this particular gene has but two alleles. One exists in the majority of humans. That allele, along with several other genes involved in pigmentation create people with various shades of brown to very brown skin. The second allele was created by a more recent mutation and spread in a more limited population. That allele produces white skin.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "But no one is trying to disprove it.\r\n \r\n But, the burden of any proof is on those making a positive claim.\r\n \r\n Unless there is a way to test for a designer, intellegent design is not science.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Maybe I should add to (or manipulate) sinjins recommendation with Compulsory Competitive Philosphy :)\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You've gotta love when ignorance lends itself to incredible mistakes like the above statement. \"Excepting\" that there is some magical sky man is precisely what atheists do. Looks like we have another Einstein who wants to test his opinions with people who actually know what they're talking about. lpdm, you'd better learn quickly, or I don't think you'll like it here as much as you were hoping. So far, you've been nothing but wrong.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I think you need to answer the same question I asked the other guy, who is God?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "wow. someone just thumbsed this down. amazing rebuttal, simply amazing.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "emoticonXDonno\r\nYou aren't seriously going to deny the homophobia in sports by pointing to a FEMALE dominated area, are you? \r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "This can only be plausible if the victims were killed before they reproduced.\r\n \r\n But, still evolutionary psychology is tenously at best called \"science.\"\r\n Just as most of psychology IMO is barely science, if at all.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "wow!! your such a guy! i bet you watch lingere womens football too dont you. womens basketball is on a much higher level then men. i bet you couldnt even tell me what a shot clock, three point shot, foul shot, or even what layup is. maybe if your tried watching womens basketball you would see how it is on a high skill level and how some wnba teams could beat mba teams.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Theories change since they are just that - theories. Once time and sufficient investigation has given them sufficient weight, they become laws. Newton's laws were derived to explain direct human experiences (we deal with relatively large objects going at slow speeds relative to the speed of light) and for that regime, they remain true. Since there were still a multitude of basic unanswered questions at the time in Science (about light, the nature of matter, etc.), investigation continued and found, in the 20th century, the laws of relativity and quantum mechanics to explain occurrences outside of the range of the large and slow that we experience. At the beginning of science (say ~17th century), there were a lot more questions than answers. Now, its the other way around - at least when it comes to the essential theoretical basis behind things that human's experience.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Give it a rest... what is evident here is more coffeehouse vasilation on your part... no foam.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And how have I deprived you of your right to teach your religion to your children in your home and in your church. How does an objection against the imposition of your religion by force of the government deprive you of your rights. I can certainly see how the imposition of your religion would deprive me of my right to the free exercise of my own religion, but why do you feel that you have a right to impose your religion on me?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Its amazing how the facts are in front of thier faces yet they still claim they are only for \"Reasonable\" gin control laws.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "A sex offender is always wicked and villainous? Geesh, not very forgiving. While I certainly agree many are, I have seen many who are not a threat to society.Those folks on \"To Catch A Predator\" are definitely a threat though.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "what i appear to have, what we all appear to have, is another case of you not following the thread. of course, pro-gay republicans are few and far between... that was my point. thanks ever so much for dredging up their website. did you notice that the 'latest news' was from last july? of course, that's better than their 'in the news' area... where nothing past 2001 and 2002 is posted. lol frankly, i'm surprised they bother to update the website at all. they're dead in the water... quite pathetic.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "And no, Simone, a market is a metaphor for countless individual relationships. To say it should be regulated is to say the government should interfere with consensual relationships.. To say that consensual relationships are immoral and that interfering with them is moral is turning morality on it's head;.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "a lot of people are adopted... my science teacher was adopted. he had a successful military career that ended with him as a war planner helping to plan the gulf war... he had a successful chiropratic practice too. what you said is not so true. should he have been denied his life because of some emotional trama he might bave later in life? i don't think so.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "We can add to this list, Singin's desire of criminalizing gun owners who don't report gun thefts in a required time and to lock up all guns in a manner that will prevent thefts. He of course says that does not mean jail, but aiding and abetting and straw sales already require serious jail time. and straw sales is already a Federal Offense with either 5 or 10 year jail terms. So we are talking about Very Serious jail terms regardless of what Sinjin might say in order to sell the idea. And one more thing the Anti-gun forces want but won't say it now.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Oh I certainly don't pretend that and certainly didn't claim that either--though a couple of left-wing posters here (who will remain nameless for now) might take the bizarre step of saying my post to you amounted to as much, if history is any indicator. Maybe we'll all luck out and they'll forget their Lenses of Bias at home, and instead read claims people actually make.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "How do you know carbon dating is so accurate? Would you bet your life on it?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You're obviously an Obama supporter, they're the only people who wouldn't be upset at his abusive tactics of threatening lawsuits against anyone that runs unfavorable ads against him, thus showing that he doesn't support the First Amendment.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "yeah, ez is what will come back to haunt you. hay ez you know why i can say anything i want about jesus with out consequence? it's because jesus never existed. sleazy, when are you going to grow up?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "eureka kitchen nightmares true blood falling skies hell's kitchen master chef hardball w/ chris matthews judge judy so you think you can dance", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "notice how not one of your examples involves guns properly secured as i have suggested? even the gunshops had nothing more than glass between the thieves and the weapons. shameful. 'cleveland police commander wayne drummond had his city-issued 9 mm glock, fully-loaded clips, mace and police baton stolen last week when teens broke into his house in the city's southeast side when he wasn't home.' 'the glock 17 was stolen in january from lt. teresa brown, who is serving a 30-day suspension for being careless with her firearm.' 'thieves broke in through a small side window in the back of the business, in an area the gun shop owner rents to a dog groomer, the chief said.'", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh yeah because someone else getting involved and helping them wage war on palestine for daring to live in their own country is really likely to prevent the war from escalating.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "And what is the full quote? Was it talking about, lets say for example, tutles, where over 90 percent of them die before reaching adulthood?In many species, that is true. The 'rule of thumb' is that the more individuals do not reach adulthood, the more offspring that species has.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I am willing to look at you, me and anyone and tell them if they are not prepared to love and nurture what is produced by sex, don't have it. If you are, get it on.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And think of what other animals have built (and for an actual purpose). Take a look at a bee hive. It's so complex and so perfect for them. They built that. An ant hill is at least 20 times the size of an ant. That's 120 feet for us (for a 6 foot person).", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "'Life threatening condition that is always physically harmful\"? What a giant load of steamy BS. Rarely is pregnancy physically harmful and even rarer is it life threatening. There are over 6 Billion people on this earth today. If motherhood was so damn dangerous, don't you think the population would be a lot lower, even if it was just due to mothers keeling over after giving birth? Where do you get this BS from, Planned Parenthood?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "\"humble ape?\" LOL! Do they keep them in separate cages at the zoo?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I'm afraid I don't recall ever saying that. Surely if I said it, you could produce some evidence, right?\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well, you're writing from an embryo's point of view, when an embryo doesn't even have a point of view. It would be like writing from a rock's point of view.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "alittle over 5 years...? try 5 years this september. you know the people who did it?! then please call the fbi immediatly and tell them what you've discovered, because they can't prove osama bin laden had a connection to september 11, 2001. that's correct. we carpet bombed afghanistan and overthrew the government we established there without having any evidence connecting osama bin laden to 9/11. and right, then we invaded iraq saying they were also some how connected as well. and you were so certain ubl attacked us? wow, you must be smarter than the entire american intelligence agency. sorry for my sarcastic response, but the mentality you're trying to push forward is except everything the government tells us and never question their motives or actions. please research alittle before posting something like this.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "After what the Fins been through, fighting the mother country, the Soviet Union under Lenin and then Russia and Germany and finally Germany, I doubt they are going to let their own government take away their guns?? Most folks have learned to leave those Finns alone.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "answer the question er i gave a rebuttal to your statement that you disagree with, but are incapable of giving a reason why? i gave you reasons just as you asked. what is preventing you from doing the same? after all you were quite insistent that responses should be more substantial than i disagree or did i misunderstand and you didn't intend for that to apply to you? your never going to get better at this if you don't try. you have made some better moves recently, but then you get lazy and over confident.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Last time I checked most state boards merely set the guidelines, whether or not they are followed is something entirely different. Still the fact that you have a board of education spouting such ridiculousness is pretty damn amusing.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Any belief system is a religion loosely defined. I'd like to know how you think rights are afforded to born persons if not by a belief system or at the very least a belief in natural rights. Either way, that doesn't address the point I had. If I can't impose my beliefs on you then who you are to impose your belief of me not hurting chemist99a?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "****! I go to Home Depot, have a basic understanding of car maintenance, love to fish, always wear sensible shoes and will frequently go without make-up. I never knew I was a XXXX. Man if I can't get my stereotypes right, I guess I will just have to give up my crush on the cute dude guitar player I saw last night..... :p", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well if there can be a Constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, why not to remove marrriage from the federal government? Where do they get that power Constitutionally? So that would mean states can choose not to recognize any marriage Constitutionally. I think that marriage is a church issue. Let gays, straights, everyone get civil unions to be recognized legally. But leave marriage to the churches.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh really? lots of people would object to sitting around doing nothing in school? really? last i checked students are always complaining and would much rather do nothing in class, than learn. and with meditation, it would help tremendously, reduce stress, help creativity, spur imagination, stay focused, learn to love, less bullying, better eating, better health, better everything...", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "no i'm not. well you certainly should be. to me it doesn't matter how the fetus got there, and seriously, why is it relevant for you to know that? wow...i'd say i'm surprised but i'm really not. so you're saying that people who don't want a baby stupid enough to have unprotected sex are on an equal playing field with those who properly applied protection which failed? that's ludicrous and you really should know better. well. with condoms.. you have no baby. and with abortion, you don't have any baby either.. you left out a few important details there buddy. with the killing of a 3-month old with an axe you have no baby. but its the same result! yippee!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Maybe it's you who needs to hope for the brain-storm.\r\nOthers got the point of my post.\r\nYou mock that which you don't get...\r\nBut I guess if you've been cornered on most of the issue, there isn't much left for you to really do but try to mock other people, and hope that nobody notices that you lost the actual debate...", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And once again (s)he rambles on while responding to nothing said in the prior post. At least you're consistent in your irrational hate speech. BTW, the term sword of truth implies no violence against anyone at all. Except in the mind of paranoid hate mongers, that is. emoticonXGood", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "go back to the part in which we were discussing a specific case and stop trying to encompass the universe in your justification. (you know there are mothers in bokoboko that don't have enough lizard eggs to feed their babies so they eat them)emoticonxbanghead i'm not surprised that a moral definition of selfish disgusts you. splat! :)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "If it did that, then you might have won an argument by now.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "But let me guess ... if they step down RIGHT after they find they will have to issue to gay couples, you'd be in favor of them being able to be sued for it, simply because the \"discrimination\" in such an event was toward gays? Right? At least if you are consistent with your stance elsewhere in regards to 'timing' ... Anyway, aside from that inconsistency with your position elsewhere, I agree that county officials should need to comply. After all, there are probably OTHER examples whereby county officials have to do things that they are religiously against, such as issue divorce papers. Or marry some drunk couple that they know aren't really being serious even though they're tying the knot ... If all county officials could just refuse to do their job because of their objections--for WHATEVER reasons--it would be a collosal mess.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You already screwed them over when you decided to cover their country in radioactive dust. Depleted uranium is a real bitch.\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Thats true. However, do we not have a state of reasonable compromise at the moment?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I agree. What is the point? Felons with firearms do not bother with CCW licenses.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "That \"per absorbed photon\" is the giveaway. I would have wanted to say to them \"don't you mean it's energy since the energy it absorbed was the energy of the photon?\" Then they would have said, you silly chemist, don't you know modern physics? emoticonXClown \r\nSo let me C&P some posts from the thread in another forum, and maybe it'll explain. But this board doesn't allow [tex][/tex] tags to represent equations and greek letters properly so it might not work out so pretty.\r\n++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "how very odd that you seem able to perceive this need, while being incapable of satisfying it. one might almost suspect that there is, in fact, no substance to back up your bald statements of denial, and that you are simply seeking to disengage from the debate whilst losing as little face as possible. tell me: how's that panning out for you? dreadfully sorry; missed you asking about this before. 'original post' (sometimes 'original poster' in context): the post or poster who began the thread. i thought the abbreviation was in common use; sorry!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "so you have no idea if any states removed interracial marriage laws without court involvement? and i'll just answer your question then which was (as you restated) [does] anybody kn[o]w of a state that had removed interracial marriage laws without court involvement. that answer is, yes, i know of a state that hard removed interracial marriage laws without court involvement. glad i could help.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "wow, it's really rare to see someone admit to changing their mind about an issue. definitely deserves an upvote.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "this is supposed to be meaningful, coming from someone who won't even read the replies in his own train wreck threads? get real.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "No, Archangel, if it wasn't done with a gun present any murders committed do not count. In this case, one armed person could have ended the slaughter so quickly it would be incredible but the blood dancers still could have had their day by celebrating that the gun put the children at risk more than the knife murderer and no telling what else they could say to dramatize the situation by claiming that guns were banned there and THAT person broke the law so off with his head...after they harvested his body for useful organs that is.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And where exactly did you hear this? I find it hard to believe a governent that couldn't keep an affair or a low-level break-in under wraps could keep something like that secret................. Also if it is true and among alliance forces why do you blame solely the US?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I thought you had vowed never to post in this forum again. ????? I suppose with your views on divorce, your wedding vows have as much weight as your vow not to post here.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Perhaps if you brushed your tooth once in a while and gargled you wouldn't have the stench.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "why would anyone want to use aspartame? drink tea or coffee without sweetener or sugar..you get used to it. if you are too fat then eat less.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well, one person got it right...where in the constitution does it say something about health having to be protected?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Rarely has truth ever supported one side of a political movement.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Were you drunk or were you high on hallucinogens...speed? lsd? crack?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "That makes her a Clinton appointee, not a \"good ole Republican\" appointee. \r\nNice try, though. emoticonXCensored", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "But again, the cost is worth it, just as it is with straight couples, as it will benefit gay couples in the same ways. It will mean better employee health and job satisfaction and increased productivity for the gay employees just as it will for the straight employees.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "well, we're not talking about the right to privacy now, are we emoticonxrolleyes oh no! of course not ... if don't want to include the issues of lost homes, lack of hospital visitation, lack of health insurance coverage, no access to survivor benefits, unfair taxation, etc.. no harm at all emoticonxrolleyes but they're not adults now, are they? love the red herring, btw. discrimination has to be justified. otherwise it is unconstitutional. not true. their marriages may not be recognized. doesn't make them illegal though. for one thing, the whole 'slippery-slope' argument is a logical fallacy. and secondly, since we do not live in a true democracy (this is a constitutional republic, after all), the rights of the minority cannot be infringed upon by the majority. milk and cookies for you for voting, though :)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "You could probably use it since in all likelihood you know absolutely nothing about it.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Could you perhaps define \"teleology\" as you understand it and say why you believe there is teleology in the universe?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "This is begging so many darn quesions it's boggling my mind!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So that's what, at least 4 lies in 8 days? Pretty impressive Archie. You should be on your knees asking god's forgiveness for your lies.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I never said they would actually follow it all the time. I said that most would incorporate it (referring to a world morality). Just because they would accept it doesn't mean they would follow it. Maybe you should stop trying to tear down your little strawmen.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "The curriculum is legal outside the public school system, and used in private schools. (I left a couple of sample links on the other board.) So do you see those private schools as engaged in child abuse?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "ROFL you don't even believe that given the democrat party's known escapades. I do hope you haven't stroked out due to the Brown victory. Let the games begin!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Socialsim and Communism in the Soviet Union failed because the USSR spent its entire existence recovering from war. The country was bombed to hell by Germany twice, around the time of the world wars. The united states put unspeakable amounts of money into their war machine, which forced the Soviets to do the same. I, for one, would buy a gun If I knew my neighbor had six, and he wanted me dead.The CIA and American military carried out immoral operations in 60+ countries since 1945. The soviet KGB, as far as I know, has only been in Germany, korea, China, and Afgahnistan.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So have I, since I know that evolution has and does take place. But I catch it from both sides because I don't believe the scientific explanation of the origins of life or the beginning of intelligent awareness.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "no. go back 6 million years ago ... oh yeah! i forgot that you lived back then... okay, but all joking aside, we can't really know. however, if the bible is correct, then they did believe in god. you know, 'cause he directly spoke to them.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Do you actually have any idea how science works? Why are you not embarrassed for creationism?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "What's a self-identified Archie doing posting under the name \"zorba\"? \"mongo\"", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You should try reading my posts. It would make you look like you know what you're talking about. ;)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "__________________________________________________ ___________\r\nAm I in the wrong blog? I thought that this was for religion?emoticonXConfused", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "no dear! how can we foget about the people who have opened the old age homes for those whose sons have left them? those are real humans!see, we cannot be so pessimistic to look at the negative side,even if the real humans are surrounding us, the brightness of sun cannot be hidden by the patches of clouds", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "huh? then what's the difference in supporting legal same-sex marriage? it's a rapidly shifting landscape. look at the current opinion polls, which favour equal marriage. the last round of ballot initiatives was some time ago, given how things are trending toward acceptance, and they didn't pass by that much. the anti-crowd is no longer mainstream society.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "As I pointed out, you don't understand what either evolution or natural selection are. Evolution is a change in the relative frequencies in inheritable characteristics in a population over generations. If the number of long haired animals became more frequent in the population, then evolution has occurred. Natural selection may (or may not) be the mechanism that caused the change.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And yet that is not the case. There are those who believe, on moral grounds, that what Hitler did was the right thing to do.\r\n \r\n An absolute morality requires absolute consensus, and there isn't any.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Oh, this should be good.\r\nPlease cite some similarities, other than the fact that both are called marriages.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh yes those horrible wicked gays that will distroy families and consume morality as we know it.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "So let me get this right. To counter Accipiter's statement that you have the intellectual maturity of a 10 y/o, you string together a bunch of words that you don't understand in context that makes absolutely no sense? \r\nPoint - set - match Accipiter.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I think we're seeing a culture war. Hardly seems a fair fight though, since only one side has any.:p", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "ah, not a problem then i read up on that rev. wright affair, and it looked to me like it was spun pretty hard. if by racist american hating nut you mean 'black guy who's tired of blacks being discriminated against and says the system needs to change', then yeah, i see your point. that's my interpretation of what he was saying, and not a subject for discussion here though. i know it's politics, but is winning more important than what's best for the country? ouch. but wouldn't it be better to have someone in there who at least knows that's how far there understanding goes and doesn't presume to know more than the people who spend their lives studying these subjects? gotcha. glad it was that one ;)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Did you slip in it AGAIN? Were you led astray by a passage from Heller you thought you could use to legitimize gun control, your wet dream?\r\nI submit from many past rulings of the courts that little statement is in error.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So which is it: the action is moral, the action is immoral, or there is no answer? You seem confused.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "really? i think war is one of those things the world absolutely learns nothing from. i mean, we're still fighting, so what exactly are we learning? to use a better and bigger gun? to make more disguisable spy planes? to train the military men more efficiently? wow. but in the end, does it all ever really solve anything? not in my opinion.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "So what standards of proof do you hold the bible to? What allows you to hold it next to other religious or fantastical texts and say \"Yes, this one is definately, without fail, the word of God, and this one is not.\" ", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "When the President is in public, there are plenty of people around him ...with guns.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Taking away peoples right to an abortion is a great idea !! People are confused and don't really know they want a kid, they just think they don't. It will all be alright after the kid arrives, .. they will discover we know best and keep and love and shelter these kids in a nurturing way. We know best and we know that none of them will ever just end up in a trash can or droped off at the local childrens home to join the thousands of other unwanted kids. None will ever become a pawn in a divorce situation, nore will any of them be sold into child slavery or prostitution. How do we know all this ? .. We just know people who don't think they are ready for or want a kid really do !! They will love and nurture it and all will be well.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Look who's talking - the bird brain who thinks Sodom and Gomorrah morality is (ahem) \"progressive.\" What is that - about 1,500 B.C. or so? Yeah right. Mr. Progressive! LOL!emoticonXChickenemoticonXChicken", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "well, you haven't been right too often on this forum, so i'm not surprised. :)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "And I'd hate to let you sneak across your dishonesty, distortions, disingenuous, and unsupported false assertions.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "i guess i'm not really surprised at some of the reaction here: ignorant blather. i am dissappointed though. it's amazing what people will say about something with no knowledge of it. yes.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "And can you please tell me the difference between nonrandom variation and directed variation? I'd also like a link to verify what you say. Thank you. God Bless!", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yea, at least on earth you get some relief, you die eventually.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "this guy's flip-flopped more times than i can count. i'm not surprised, nor will i be if he fails to follow through on his words.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "You have any examples of that? Shooting people for throwing rocks and eggs at houses that is.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "was it a 'sexual based movement', as you've called it, then, or a civil rights movement? those opposed at the time, would have more than likely saw it essentially as a 'sexual based movement', led by people who didn't want to stay in the closet about their sexuality.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Where better to find more info on the evolutionary migration of humanity than from friendly atheist.com. Keep that pure science with no agenda coming you guys.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So there you have an example of a deterministic system acting to suprise you with unpredictable behavior. Consider it an example of deterministic \"free-will\"", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "really? wow! my parents did the same thing! we had a water-cooler bottle that my dad put change into for years, and when we were little kids we went to cash it in, all of us helping to roll the hundreds of pounds of coins, and it ended up being worth over $900! ever since then, i've been a coin fanatic. people are so quick to throw away change. my friends know that i'll always take a nickel or a few pennies if they don't want to carry them around.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Actually it wasn't sitting somewhere since there was no \"where\" to \"sit\" and \"always\" and \"eternity\" have no meaning outside of time and no \"time\" existed prior to the \"Big Bang\", maybe.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "No offense, but I am in my early teens and understand the situation more than you.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "With all the debt Obama has generated for our nation, he deserves to be filibustered into the ground. For too long the democrats had absolute power and ran amok and unchecked, answering to absolutely nobody and ignoring the will and the voice of the people.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "this article conterdicts the clame that crime is not increasing in the UK, it was just that they changed how they were reporting it, when they tightened the gun restrictoins (as when they mandated all guns be in safes). http://www.portercountysheriff.com/i.../01-05-UCR.pdf i have never said there is a direct couse and effect of having an armed home, and lower crime. i do point out that in places that alow a home owner to protect there property, there is a lower rate of crime. there is more to it than just being armed, it is just one part of the mind set that your life, and the lives of your famley are worth defending.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "now, if we're talking natural insemination by donor, that would likely be morally unacceptable in most circles, though certainly not all. really? i mean that sincerely. sometimes i am really surprised by what people find immoral. most people seriously object to that? why? o.o", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "1) \"false impression by stating that a Christian Pastor believes that bigotry blocked Gay Marriage.\" 2) \"Had the title said, pro-gay pastor believes bigotry blocked gay marriage\" The only difference here being that you would want to label him as \"pro-gay\" and exclude \"Christian\". By the same token, should we remove \"Christian\" and replace it \"anti-gay\" from any pastor that speaks against homosexuality? Naw. Of course not. There is nothing dishonest about acknowledging he is a Christian. His statements should make it clear that he is pro-gay. Your dispute is pointless...", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Nice to know that you are breaking the law responsibly. emoticonXGood", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Pretty much every experiment ever carried out in a petri-dish; take your pick Also the revisited peppered moth experiment I linked to earlier.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Actually, that honour is reserved for the usual representations of those who advocate young earth creationism.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "There are several scientific explanations for the nature of the earth. Some use 'science' to say that the world is flat. Granted that these beliefs aren't widely accepted, but then not all religions are widely accepted. By your reasoning or 'logic' you must ask yourself about whether you should rely on science when there are many different scientific theories.The Flat Earth News, at least back then, had a regular column, \"One Hundred Proofs Earth is Not a Globe.\"(go to http://www.flat-earth.org/)Other theories taught as sciencephrenologyalchemyevolutioneugenicsneptunismTheories of the Aether Articles relating to the Emergence of Scientific Theories of the Cosmic Aether(http://www.mountainman.com.au/aether.html)What about 'metascience'?http://www.calresco.org/lucas/science.htmOr, sciences used to support political ends...What about Marxist Sciencehttp://www.marxists.org/archive/hald...philosophy.htmor Chaos Theory and Marxismhttp://www.marxist.com/science/chaostheory.htmlThere's Nazi Sciencehttp://www.webster.edu/~woolflm/naziscience.htmlNationalist Sciencehttp://www.ljudmila.org/nettime/zkp4/08.htmOr social ends...Scientific Racismhttp://www.press.uillinois.edu/f02/tucker.htmlMainstream scientists instead of using the word 'heretic' use the word 'pseudo-science' to categorise fringe beliefs.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "He don't, billsco, and better not try to, imo.If I were to base my job on some religion(s), then I wouldn't be manufacturing bombs and ammo.But, these people need to check in with their religion a little closer. If they use The Holy Bible as a guide, then they better read it a little closer. The Bible says that if you're sick, seek a doctor.If you don't like what a doctor says, go to another. If he gives you a prescription, go get it filled. If Jack's Drug Store won't fill it, go to Ajax Drugs, etc, etc.You can't force morality on anyone, anyway. At least that's what I've found...and I don't do it for a living.On edit: How do you edit a poll? I meant to click on \"NO\", but I hit \"Don't Know\"I feel like one of Bill Cosby's kids.... :)", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "That's the best you could do? There's the other three and here's a bonus one: 'To disarm the people is the best, most effectual way, to enslave them.' - George Mason", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Neener neener - is it time to go in from the playground yet?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Like I said, Catholic school. Or it could be that you're like 80 years old or something, because nowadays, if you talk about God or the Bible, then you don't get in trouble, you get criticized and made-fun-of, not only by your peers, but also by teachers.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "This is the most asinine argument yet. The man was making six figures as a radio talk show host. Why would he leave that job to hit the road for 18 hour days away from family merely in the hopes of hawking a few extra books? He had an ESTABLISHED platform to sell boks viz a viz his radio show, his frequent substitutions on other programs, and his status as a darling of the Tea Party. The man could line up paid speaking engagements to hawk his book. Why would he trade that for unpaid speaking engagements to hawk his book?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "bass, what is the response in ny? bad news for clinton as this was one of her endorsers. and a superdelegate. will she disavow the support of the gov as she asked obama? will she reject or merely renounce? this is not a private matter. what the executive of the state does in private opens him up to bribery and blackmail and compromises his integrity. if the man can break a vow he has made before god and his wife, how can the voters trust any promise he may make? he is toast.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "I'll let you know if or when I'm ignoring you, O Hell-bound spawn of Satan.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well, first, those were Hebrews, not Christians. Secondly, the scripture doesn't say they raped them, it says \"keep them for yourselves.\" That could mean rape, however, I'm pretty sure that was not Moses's intention. Also, the Hebrews considered it impure to lie with non-Hebrew women or men, so if there was any sexual immorality going on it was very small. However, that DOESN'T mean it was justified or right.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Such personal attacks as yours indicate a bankruptcy of argument and reveal much about you while revealing nothing about me. If someone says that you are more likely to die in a car accident than in an airplane accident would accuse them of not caring about airplane accident victims? Would you accuse them of taking delight in the number of car deaths? ", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Is it the square peg's fault it won't go through the round hole?\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "and i love it how you attempt to once again change the subject when you have been proven wrong and have nothing more to support your position. can you stay on topic and reply to my previous rebuttal of your nonsense?..", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "the reason why premise 1 can logically stand is that God is first of all defined as the \"greatest possible being\". no matter what reality we are considering, such a thing as the greatest possible being in that relity must exist. \"greatest\" is a superlative, compared to all other beings that exist its like \"the oldest man alive\". no matter what scenario, such a person as the oldest man alive will always exist, therefore such a man (that fits that definition) will have a necessary existence", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh yes and i canyt read books ask questions. so i know nothing about how saddam was ' no threat' well he was a few years ago. now hes not cuz we found the coward in a hole.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "You offer no positive evidence towards Creationism nor did you deny that the idea of Creationism as scientific was destroyed long ago.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You believe two things that are incorrect: that you have refuted evolutionary theory, and that we will now accept intellegent design because of your attempt.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So you think that people that express a different point of view than you are doing something illegal? You must disagree with freedom of speech. You're a scary guy.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "As JP pointed out, Canadian, and you better believe I'll \"mouth off\" my opinions. \r\nKinda difficult in a forum such as this don't you think?\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "so then women who are pregnant shouldn't be allowed to 1) smoke 2) take any kind of drug that could possibly harm the child 3) drink or do any otherwise legal action? and vor takes another giant step towards fascism.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Drugs should be legal. period.\r\nJust like that other more nefarious drug: ReligionemoticonXAngel", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yes an I am sure you love unbridled capitalism, cruel self centred people do. Capitalism is a cruel system that kills people, lets them starve, makes them homeless, and exploits the poor for the gain of a few.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well, at least you are more consistent about equality than a lot of people in your movement. \r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "But I suppose this is all MY/Our Fault too. Huh Brady?First all of Mexico's violence was my/our fault until it was found out that the ATF was actually running guns into Mexico, now what some slimeball does in Norway is my fault. Get a clue.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "It seems that Prop 8, banning gay marriage passed by around 300+ thousand votes. So the inconsistency persists, unless there was voter fraud that only touched on the top of the ticket which would explain why it appears that more progressives supported Obama than these side issues.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You could try to be a good person and nevermind about the hocus pocus stuff. I'm not tryimg to convince you of anything. The fact is that what you use a reasons to believe don't hold up under logical scrutiny. Don't justify faith with logic. That only cheapens faith.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "could you see language evolving in non social animals? it wouldnt have a reason to.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "I noticed that you do reply to mine. Perhaps you should reconsider since you're getting your ar$e handed to you with every reply I write. ;)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "But, but, I am a guy. And a hunky one at that.*\r\n*filthy lie", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "you must be talking to somebody not in this thread because no one here likes to burn flags. how much of posts do you actually read? poor nurglitch. some possible outcomes of this. 1) all the 'socialists' end up in jail, for a victimless crime. 2) all the 'socialists' leave. turning america into a more rightwing, conservative society 3) other forms of dissent become more widespread, 'seditious' literature, riots, even acts of terrorism. result - more socialists in jail, lots of injury and damage. how are any of these good things? we should see this for what it really is - political 'one-up-manship' against 'lefties'", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Right. We are explaining natural phenomena by natural means. We do so simply because we can test natural explanations while we cannot test the supernatural. We use methodological naturalism (not, by any means, philosophical naturalism) to observe, test and explain the natural. This is not a denial of god or an assumption about the existance of a god. It is a recognition of the fact that we cannot investigate the supernatural by natural means. Even methodological naturalists can be theists - Kenneth R. Miller for example.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "This is correct. It is almost insulting to regard people as either a) Christian OR Catholic - as this also implies that Orthodox are neither", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "But you are smart enough to realize that the ban on gay marriage has nothing to do with it.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So then if I owned a business or a piece of property I could then refuse to sell or accommodate fundamentalist anti gay Christians and \"That it has been \"open to all for years\" carries no weight whatsoever.\" It is my property and I don't like the immorality of fundamentalist anti gay Christians.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Which wouldn't make a darn bit of difference - apart from the tiny matter of women dying and suffering permanent harm, but don't let that bother you. you'll also have to amend the constitution to remove any references to bodily autonomy. get ready to donate your kidney!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I think I understand this. The goal is clear, check. Self-restraint is good, check. But I do not see what this has to do with the OP. Could you explain, please? Who are you recommending should use self-restraint? The protestors? Or are you saying, self-restraint is your recommendation for birth control?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "On an internet forum why is that so important? The bigger man usually need not find it necessary to prove he is, but is secure in his knowledge he is or is big enough to realize when he isn't and adjust accordingly.My guess is this is not the only place this happens. These things happen, you fall, you get up, people laugh, you move on, you see someone fall you can laugh or help them up. Just depends on who you want to be.Sorry I am a sucker for empty milk crates. Can't seem to walk by one without jumping on and taking her for a spin.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Right, uh huh. That sounds like a big rationalizing to me.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "i do like written constitutions very much; and our constitution is not vague at all. in the first amendment, the question is not whether congress may make a law, but rather what is 'the freedom of the press?' this phrase has objective, historic meaning, and obscenity is not covered within that objective, historic meaning. neither, by the way, is the publishing of nuclear secrets. you have gathered incorrectly, for i do not want a direct democracy. how do you suppose we got 'civil rights' recognized in the constitution to begin with, matthew? did the words just magically appear there, or did a vast majority of people vote to put them there? oh yes, that's right, a vast majority of people voted to put them there. darn evil democracy! i say down with majority rule!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "That would be one hell of a kiss...you would probably drown first though :)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "ever heard of the good old 'i caught a fish this big' story, and others similar to it? that's what happened here. it is perfectly logical to assume that someone witnessed a large flood, and over time it all got blown out of proportion and became the ludicroud claim of the entire world flooding and a man making a boat (which is pretty much incapable of actually floating and surviving a flood) and carrying two of every animal. with each telling of a story, things are changed and added and exaggerated - that's just common sense.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "hello my dear! what do you think people should live in a peaceful world? as you know george washington is cruel man who did a lot of bad things in order to be success, to get high position? you know that a lot of people died from washington? most people from iran and irak suffered more distress and you can not imanige that situation. what about the twin towers? maybe you think that that accident was by muslin people? no, it was not! of course washington did it in order to substitute muslim men", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "and how do you know?? let's see evidence of this. or, it is just one of your proclamations?? that statement says to me 'i can close my eyes to all evidence, all common sense, because i believe in god'.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "have you considered a career in advertising?\r\nby the way you f***ed us too. Australians troops were cannon fodder in WWI for the British Empire, remember Gallipoli?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well to get healthcare from $6000 per person to $3,400 per person you'd have to pay them less or fire them. So do I understand you correctly that we will either cut pay or fire doctors and nurses?EDIT: that seems dramatic...not \"fire\" them but they will basically go into another profession since they are no longer needed.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "As was pointed out in some of your own quotations, survival is not an 'end' of natural selection. Natural selection is the differential reproductive success of organisms with more favorable suites of characteristics. It is a statistical tendency. Individual organisms may work to survive, but they also work to reproduce. That's as close as it gets to \"purpose.\" And as you know, Darwin's favored term was natural selection. He never used the phrase \"survival of the fittest\" without also making a reference to natural selection. The opposite is not the case. Since Darwin's time \"survival of the fittest\" has been rejected by evolutionary biologists because it is such a poor representation of the extent of the theory.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "That statement exposes your ludicrousy. First, you say you're against killing children who don't have a chance. Then you say the death of the Kurds and the WTC mean nothing to you. What chance did the children in the gassed Kurdish village have? What chance did the children in the WTC Day Care Center have?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "what is capitalism? can there be something like 'responsible capitalism' and, if so, what would 'responsible capitalism' be? my view is that the term 'capitalism' has a multitude of meanings dependent upon who is defining it and that 'capitalism' could have a multitude of modifiers to further refine its meaning. is to be a capitalist to be utterly free of responsibility and blame for the evils that capitalism may cause?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Look who uses profane language; And you claim I'm regressing ! emoticonXChicken emoticonXChicken emoticonXChicken emoticonXChicken emoticonXChicken emoticonXChicken", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "kronus, like i said, you have to accept that (abiogenesis) by faith, don't you, since no one has ever seen it take place? and it can't be replicated either, can it? oh ye of great faith! lol!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "well, based on this argument, why shouldnt we kill mute, paralysed, vegetable, comatose, and very very drunk people, since they all cant think, or if they can they cant communicate that they are thinking. How about new-born babies that dont know anything? how about retarded children? you are fooling yourself if you think that women undergo abortions because they dont like that particular \"part of their body\". women undergo abortions because they dont want to raise the child when its born. until you face that truth, you'll be arguing under a dellusion", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "jesus has always existed, he is god, and god has existed before all man or anything at all. alexander the not-so-great must have have been one of the biggest std spreaders in history than!!! lets all praise him for the great things he has done like spreading stds!!!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Genes transfered horizontally are as subject to selection as anyother form of gene. Once intergrated into the recieving genome they are simply one more heritable element and if they alter the phenotypes (many are either neutral or even inactivatee) then of course they are subject to selection. Why do you think otherwise? Remember that horizontal transfer is a rare event roughly on a par with ordinary mutations.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "This judge stated that it was UN-Constitutional (according to California Constitution) to limit marriage to opposite-gender couples. So . . . . . why did we vote in 2000 on the definition of marriage? And since the majority stated that marriage was between one man and one woman - why was that not taken into consideration with this ruling? Why is it that when the people speak their voice, it is IGNORED?? Not only the mayor of SF - but this Superior Court judge as well?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Referencing the NT in an attempt to justify the NT? The very same NT which was written by Jesus' followers? I see. \r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "These items do not have killing as their primary use.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You're pulling my leg, right? I've been hiring scientists for well over 20 years now and you're going to pull up a wiki reference, that I can edit myself, to prove me wrong? emoticonXWow\r\nTell me, have you ever met an engineer or a scientist? Have you ever seen the curricula that they take or do you just pull statements from your posterior?\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh yeah, they all have a secret meaning to me, lol except the dna helix, i just really love biology x) i much prefer to have something permanent on me meaningful.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "wow....there is a real person under there. Good luck on your recovery, chemist.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Because the soundbite \"survival of the fittest\" was coined to explain evolution to the stupid masses.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "How do you define evolution? If you don't see any, then you aren't using the definition used by evolutionary biologists. The question is who should define the vocabulary of evolutionary biologist, evolutionary biologists or creationists?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "my my you are up on the current events. Thanks for shedding light on this for everyone here.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well that explains your anger.:p I hope you are blessed with homeliness.:) Makes your commitment easier to keep. How old are you now? ", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "The idea of abortion as population control is absurd, especially forced abortions as someone mentioned a few posts ago. Anyone who has read a biology book knows the world has methods of population control on its own, we don't need to be doing stuff like that ourselves.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Or, since he didn't have $37-million tucked away from questionable business practices and a rich daddy, perhaps he paid attention to the ramifications of abnormal deficit spending.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh but he/ she is. his often speaks out to remind our dear mps that they are supposed to be leaders of our country, not school kids a playground. he does this by yelling 'order!' a lot. and he gets to wear a silly wig i think (or is that 'black rod'?) (ps, wilted_laughter is irish i think. your post sort of implies you think him english. calling an irishman 'english' is a crime even more serious than calling someone a 'liberal' in the usa :p)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "ok, great so far. we're getting some good predictions on both sides. i think this is going to be a lot of fun to look back at in time. keep it up. more topics... cap and trade. will strict controls be placed? what effects if so? iraq. will he pull out? what happens then? (with iraq or terror here or whatever) how much $$$ will he throw at the economic crisis? what will the outcome be? anything you all want to predict or comment on concerning the upcoming presidency will be appreciated. have fun!", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "there was no ccw in texas at the time, that law she got passed was the ccw law that ma richards refused to sign, she would rather burn women and children in the davidian church and illegally allow violation of posse commitatus and allowing other state guards into texas. you 9 years old now, mentally? the cafeteria had no policy such as you mention. there was a law enforcement convention going on right next door and they were unaware of it so more proof that cops can't protect you! emoticonxcensored", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Really? The transcript shows that he did not ask her anything in the Gay marriage section of the discussion.Transcript can be found here: http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/pr...al-debate.htmland here: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/...ipt/index.html (click on the same-sex benefits section and the transcript shows up right next to the video)", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So I pray to chance every night before I go to bed?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/03/science/03angi.html. I've had three children, which gave me an opportunity to observe intimately the development of infants. Also, I worked with emotionally unstable children aged 3 and older, and observed what a delightful species the three-year-olds are. At that point, infants have progressed from the largely self-involved awareness of the 24-month infant as the developing human deals with the problem of separateness and, as a result, issues a robust declaration of independence. No! No! No! are the bywords of a two-year-old. No! I won't! And you can't make me!", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "The guy can have an opinion but the ultimate choice is up to the woman who can listen to what the guy says or not, it's up to her. I believe that is what sinjin was saying.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "They do offer a good insulating blanket which would keep the body of the reptile warm which in turn, would allow the reptile to remain active for a longer period of time. This means more time to hunt and reproduce carrying the mutation onwards.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "is it only the spiritually blind that can see guys like this for what they really are? rip preacher.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "How is one supposed to be smugly self-righteous if this is the case? No fair.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh yeah? tell that to the next person you see running down the street wielding a knife. ;)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "So have you found figures pertaining to the rate of mountain growth? It is not enough to see with the naked eye the way erosion is. This explanation would also cause some mountains to fall as tectonic plates move away from eachother. Again after billions of years all rivers in existence would be deeper than those in the grand canyon without the material coming down from mountains.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "I'm not arguing that gun control will change the nature of men- though guns may make them more willing and confident to engage in crime. With guns criminals can do even more damage. Adding guns to crime is like adding gasoline to a fire- it makes an already existing problem worse. If you think that just as many people die from stabbing and beatings in other developed nations as people die from guns in the US then you need to do more research.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yeah, that's probably what Stalin and Hitler said at first too. They were also big fans of 'gun-control'. 'Gun-control' works great.. especially in countries with fewer freedoms and/or socialist governments. I read somewhere that in Japan that the police can (and do) visit you twice a year at your home unannounced to question you about your activities. And yet, people still die at the hands of criminals there like anywhere else. Sorry, you assume that because the 'law-abiding' abide by these laws that that will somehow affect the actions of those that disobey the laws. Doesn't work that way. You liberals are always quick to blame inanimate objects for the actions of the irresponsible. But then, liberalism is all about excusing the behavior of the irresponsible.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "The empire you defend is tyrannical. They are responsible for the death of millions.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Aside from this being completly wrong, it is quite compelling. You make a good point in regard to an organism's form only making sense in relation to its environment. Of course, this is a cornerstone of evolutionary theory. Organisms that are more successful in a certain environment will reproduce and be the ones present in said environment. It actually is possible to look at genes without the context of the orginal creature. This is why we can move genes from one organism and place them in another. Given a complete understanding of molecular biology, we could contruct any form of organism we desired from scratch.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I see you still don't understand what a strawman is. It is hard to have a strawman when the comment wasn't directed at any particular claim....", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I've been a fan ever since your first fake hairflip goodbye. emoticonXGood", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "our american cousins might not be able to hear the good archbishop as the bbc usually don't allow people outwith uk to listen again. the way i see it is we have minimum wage, why can't we have a maximum wage? some of money that company directors get is absolutely obscene. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3243290.stm event when they fail they get a nice golden hand shake, in no other job would you get a big pay off for failure. also no matter way you spin it is so obvious that jesus was a hippy communist anarchist leftist. :) http://www.gnosticliberationfront.co...irty_hippy.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/christian_communism", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "And I see you still flip back and fourth from being an atheist to not being an atheist.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "emoticonXFrazzled\r\nYou call gays \"degenerate\", and then complain about \"demonizing\" others???\r\nemoticonXDonno", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Do you mean like Piltdown Man? It was displayed there for 40 years. \"The Eoanthropus dawsoni, or Piltdown Man, was on display at the Natural History Museum in London for 40 years. It was removed when advanced dating techniques not only showed that the bones were only a few hundred years old, but that some of them weren't even human.\" http://www.mentalfloss.com/press_oklahoman2.htm Do you guarantee that all of the other displays at the Museum are true? No, of course not. Many other things there said to be 'true' are only 'true' in a transient sense of the word (that only science seems to use) http://www.clarku.edu/~piltdown/map_...klywiener.html Suggests that Piltdown Man had good science behind it, at the time. Never-the-less the Natural History Museum provides many examples of artistic licence, such as the 'human-like' hand given to a restoration of Australopithecus, displayed at the museum. \"Shattering the Myths of Darwinism\", p205", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "No. We don't agree. For one thing your faith isn't a theory. Creation as described in Genesis is a myth, in fact, two myths. Furthermore, a scientific theory doesn't mean \"wild guess with no foundation\". That seems to be what you want the word to mean. In science a theory is an explanation for observed facts that has been tested. You see, a theory is predictive. I'll give you some examples of scientific theories. The germ theory of disease, the theory of gravitation, the heliocentric theory, tectonic theory, atomic theory. Moreover, you are wrong that science cannot observe actual evolution of life. It is done all the time. While it may be debatable that a virus is alive, the recent case of SARS making the jump from civets to humans after a mutation is evolution.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I feel a No True Scotsman coming on. Should I even bother to mention Hovind?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I argue against them with regards to whatever argument they muster. Do we have any of those on this message board? Because from what I can see, it's primarily the \"religious\" argument counter...", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well, many have argued that if you don't except a literal Genesis, you're damned. Perhaps not in this particular thread, but the arguments are esentially the same. I believe that the theological implications of that position are fair game for discussing the validity of creationism. ", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Cheerio and thanks for the examples! Yes these are perfect examples of animals creating \"unnatural\" things- I happen to be thinking of Beavers and their dams but hey, thats just me.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "it's quite obvious that you didn't read any of the responses. and who are you to call anyone blind believers when you think it's anywhere in the realm of easy to shoot a human being at 200 yards with a handgun? at 200 yards you probably can't even hit the broad side of a barn.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "And posts like yours serve no purpose other than to detract from the subject at hand. The subject at hand involves how some people choose to fear the law-abiding and feel safer with the law-breakers. You've done absolutely nothing to dispute these facts and prove them wrong.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Actually, most people do not hold the view that existing marriages should be dissolved. In Massachussetts, it's quite a minority view, almost as low as Bush's approval rating. In any case, that is irrelevant. I was pointing out why someone might reasonably ask the question you consider so inappropriate. What I haven't seen, either from you or from any of the articles, was what the firefighter's answer was or why he refused to answer. From what I can tell from the scant coverage, he avoided answering but had no trouble discussing his political views. Odd, I think.. or just crappy coverage.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And here all along, I thought I was a humble servent of Evil...\r\nOh, and I'd doubt I'm a 'patriot'. I don't even say the pledge of allegience.\r\nI'm more of a mercenary.\r\nJust letting you know how to beat a 'terrorist.'", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "But not just any seven judges, seven judges who's job is to define the constitution.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Fine... go live in China. Live in their socialism. Enjoy your 2 an hour!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Actually, it hasn't. Phylogenetic analysis has no relevance to Occam's Razor. Further, DNA for all organisms is the same until you examine specific sequences. It isn't that the DNA is different, what matters is the the sequence of the bases is different.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "i agree, it is we that it is ridicules that we have gotten so into controlling stuff that now we even have a way to control natural courses, but i guess like i said before if it is to stop your child from suffering a sickness then i guess that is okay (still bad) but better than just being a complete control freak, or being selfish", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well, yes. Eleven years is quite swift, but it actually supports the theory of evolution through natural selection. The estimates of the speed of evolution that you seem to be depending on were done by George Gaylord Simpson way back in the 1940s or 1950s. Since then, we have observed fruit flies, as well as other specimens, to evolve quite rapidly, showing significant evolution in only a decade or so. More recently, however, scientists have been able to observe evolution in natural settings and have found that it can sometimes be quite rapid when environmental change is rapid. Besides the studies that Reznick did on guppies, there are also the studies of the Galapagos finches by the grants, and studies of anole lizards in the Bahamas. These are observable phenotypical changes, not speciation events.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Unfortunately Democrats have a credibility problem. Many Pro-gun Democrats have been elected, and America is giving them a chance, but apparently they do not believe Obama because of his past Anti-gun support and votes. However Ms. Feinstein's comments about waiting for the correct timing to bring up gun control did not help the creditability problem either. I guess only time will tell.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So if you were attacked by a 250 pound man who is an 8th Degree Blackbelt, you'd prefer a fair fight?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yes, I've noticed that. I do think part of the problem is that he hasn't bothered to get educated in the subject. From the arguments I've seen from him over the time he's been here he seems to rely on YEC websites for information, and when he gets to something he doesn't know it seems like he cuts-and-pastes (often without fuly reading) from google (leading to the Civil War Dinosaur fiasco and the Nazca stones fiasco) that seems to support his views", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Man. You just refuse to get it.\r\nYou think liberals are asking this cause we're greedy?\r\nWe are trying to HELP OTHERS.\r\nSomething Christians should be interested in...\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Oh, oh, and don't forget to include the proposed Federal Kosher Amendment's text, which just coincidentally matches the Levitical proscriptions, in your argument that things like the FMA have nothing to do with separation of church and state.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Buy stock in the failing banks? What a great investment. Tell me, where does the money come from?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "that's certainly an issue in its own right, yes - but matthew's gaffe is suggestive of the kind of post-hoc jiggery-pokery that shaped the bible's contents. as far as fulfilling prophecy goes, is it really prophecy if someone knowingly sets out to make it come true? zechariah could have had the messiah turning up walking backwards eating a pork pie - so long as any would-be messiah knows what he has to do :) and when all's said and done, the new testament was written decades after the fact, with the old testament near at hand, a desire to spread christianity burning in the breast, and nobody to say these prophecies hadn't been fulfilled. i respect your decision to believe they were, but i don't see any objective reason to agree.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Even though I am for gay marriage I do agree. Correlation is not causation.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "and a few posts later you whined about ad homs. maybe you could support that? perhaps you would prove to us that we are truly vile, evil, callous, despicable people that deserve to burn in the firey depths of hell for the murders that each and every one of us has committed? or perhaps you wouldn't.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "So you support allowing a 10 y/o to buy an Uzi and carry it into a federal court house or school as long as he does not commit a crime? Wow. And your logic about taking criminals off the street and then having no gun control concerns would be perfect...if we had a finite number of criminals. We don't. New murderers and theives and carjackers and dope dealers and bank robbers and child rapists are born every day.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "tennis? you're joking right? it's already been proven that women can take on a man anytime in that game! others not so much but tennis most definately!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "So religion must be systematically abandoned and eradicated, not completely, just enough to be out of the public and political realm, leaving atheism as king. It's not my pet theory that evolutionists are saying that, it's a fact that they are saying that", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "can you support this moronic statement? the answer is obviously no. also, why should obama be less responsible for his own words on guns and religion than palin is for the words of her audience? the media will follow palin through the gates of hell and beyond to find something to demonize her. what lengths won't they take to attack republicans?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "as sharp as you are, i am surprised you missed my sarcasm. it happens. we do usually like to stir things up when it interests us. we sell weapons to taiwan and israel. well then we have nothing to worry about. i didn't say that. we should be concerned by how much money is poured into these black ops programs. i support them, but i am concerned about over spending on them.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "So who do you hold responsible for forcing people to stay at the convention center to die? Lemme guess.Should they be held criminally negligent? I'm sure the \"bipartisan\" commission will find out who is responsible and hold them accountable.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "The number of deaths wouldnt be lower in any way. After all, countries like Rwanda and Sierra Leone dont have a working governmental strucure so couldnt enforce such a ban.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Oh, undoubtedly - but the offspring aren't inheriting traits as such are they? They're just suffering the same symptoms of malnutrition as their parents, except that for them it's happening in vitro so they exhibit the effects from birth. That's why it's ", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh my gosh i am bloody stunned! speachless(almost) even.you are an absolute genious! oh if i knew how to type bowing to your feet, i would.thankyou.sincerely dacey.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "I predict everyone will now stay away from forums dutch starts. emoticonXFrazzled", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Because their reasoning is obviously on the same level as their reading comprehension level.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I've got to concentrate...concentrate...concentrate. I've got to concentrate...concentrate...concentrate...Hello?.. .Hello?...Hello? Echo...Echo...Echo...Pinch hitting for Pedro Colon...Manny Mota...Mota...Mota...", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "The egyptians predicted his birth, death, WWI, WWII, and they have predict the supposed end of the world. Are you saying that this religion was wrong? They predicted a lot more that I have not put that have come true.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Where is the evidence for an American-style \"culture of fear\" in India? An op-ed from a Detroit-based member of a rightwing thinktank shouting that they need guns, just doesn't cut it.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "It is our civic duty to convince these people that they are SICK!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And the UN seems to feel it's necessary to spell out that you have the right to marry and have a family.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well, if you combined his plan with all the others, then make all the cuts at once, you would be like 25% of the way there!! \r\nCome on, Steeeve...we have limited material to work with here.....", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Is there some kind of prize for most consecutive straw-man arguments. I ask this because you seem to be going for a record. No where have I claimed that I would fix your problems, many though there are.\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You would say that, because you are neither a woman, nor gay. Families were ruled by the husband with a clenched iron fist by the way, and women and children had few rights. The family structure was \"secure\" that way. Yes, the fact that there was lower teen pregnancy outside of marriage, is just such a good thing in and of itself. This meant fewer people burning in hell, which is what is really important.emoticonXRolleyes", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And you tell people not to call you a gay basher? LOLemoticonXRolleyes emoticonXRolleyes emoticonXCensored \r\nI know very well what faux means - that is the reason it is bashing to call someone's marriage that.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "confirming god is, at best, a one-on-one job....anyway. unless someone has personally experienced the things of god - how would one go about proving it? i know, i know...can't prove a negative....", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "glad to know you bring spelling into this. Shows where you are in the argument. And where did the life saving question come from?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Oh my goodness, yes. I had forgotten that scenario. How silly of me.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And depending on what human is \"finding the answers\" it can unfortunately cheapen and deny many central Biblical teachings.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Ok. I'm not a YEC. So, God creation through science is a viable option for my faith.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "speaking of dear, kindly, old moses, (sorry, i mean charlton heston,) and truths, half-truths and downright lies. does anyone know that a few years ago, the australian foreign minister had to lodge a formal protest against the good mr heston's portrayal of australia as (quote) 'the most violent society on earth'. heston and the nra claimed this to be the result of newly introduced gun restrictions in australia? homicides per million - usa 57 australia 18 which would you say comes close to being the most violent society? leo", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "That's good - so you no longer believe all actions that result in inevitable deaths are killings, only cruel ones. This is an improvement on your previous:\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Did you go to college, Trebor? You might want to look up how \"pedophilia\" is spelled. LOL!! Then you can go have a beer with Orion and watch his head swivel.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "I believe I said I would change my view. I will change my view on the issue of whether homosexuality is genetic.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I have no idea what youre talking about, moreno. English is a foreign language? Maybe it is to you, I dont know.\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "and you can thank the unions with their inflated wage/benefit packages they strongarmed from companies/municipalities for the high cost. oh yes it is. new york is the only state where pbulic sector jobs, which bring little to no growth to an economy actually outpace the private sector. and you still think that heavy industry is the end-all be-all to economic survival?? america has a dynamic economy, not static.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "I specified that I was talking about CONSERVATIVES.\r\nWhat is there about that that makes you think I am talking about you?\r\nAre you \"plural\"?\r\nDo YOU define the \"conservative\" stance?\r\nThere is no right-minded analysis which can take what I said about the CONSERVATIVE stance and pretend that I had to have been talking about you, unless one assumes you ARE THE \"conservative stance\".\r\nAnd considering you profess libertarian, it makes it even more bizarre that you pretend to interpret things in such a way...\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Oh I quite agree. Unfortunately, not everyone is able to see it as such. I was admitting to those who don't that it does appear that God confirms their homosexual prejudices. To back Traveler up however, I don't buy the 'closet case' answer myself. People who are racist aren't secretly scared they are black, equally homophobes aren't necessarily closet homosexuals. Unfortunately such irrational prejudices just exist.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "if easyrider is so concerned about pedophilia (which he isn't he's just using it as a lame excuse to scapegoat homosexuals) why then doesn't he speak out again the catholic church and the cover up their doing on their sex scandals? you know who actively does care about the well being of these children? atheists. atheists like richard dawkins. wheres your slippery slope on morality now easy?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "It stops us from saying we ara a rational people. I don't support any laws that would allow a father not to have a say so about his child being aborted. Are there any?? If it were a life or death thing for the mother no question. As I stated I don't li", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "You mean you're for real? You're not setting out deliberately to make creationists look as if they don't know what they're talking about? Because that's all you're achieving.\r\nStill no source for the trillions, I see.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "cute. but it misses the point. your rationale is like saying hadrian's wall is mis-named because hadrian wasn't out there putting or the rocks in place, but merely caused it to be made. i know the followers of many great leaders hid their leaders burial sites. for want of a better example i can think of attila the hun who was buried in a river 'somewhere'.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "And if someone had written an ad proclaiming that black Americans are inferior the same thing would have happened as well. I can't justify what they did but when you put such a hot-button issue out like that into the open...it has to be expected. People have strong feelings about abortion rights (just like racism) and it is naive to think something like this wasn't going to happen.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So, faith and argument from incredulity. If you find it impossible please state exactly what part is impossible. Then maybe an actual scientist could take over.Major in molecular biology? Not even a full degree; not like your going to doing anything original.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "well...., i hope you're kidding because i don't think that's a fair assessment.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Then you freely admit that you lied when you said this, and I quote: People like Arch are setting it as opposed to science and in that position it will be doomed to fail. AND Arch is doing nothing but distorting the very thing he holds so dear, I mean, how is accurately quoting passages from the bible distorting it in any way? You do nothing but post drivel which makes no factual statements at all. And you call that debating? ", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Ah, but the issue in this thread is what the fetus really means to anti-choicers/anti-lifers.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "'Who's definition? Yours? Do you OWN the copyright to a word? I didn't think words were copyrightable. emoticonXWow \r\nGeez. emoticonXRolleyes More bovine excerment.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I presume that you mean \"non-sequitur\" and \"absolutely\". But nevertheless, you're going to have to explain and support that assertion before any thinking person could possibly give it any credence. You're going to have to give examples of scientific evidence and theories that have been called a \"fact\" that are based on nothing or a non-sequitur.\r\nReally. This is a debate. Put up or shut up. Support your ignorant assertions or go away.\r\nBy the way, at what university did you earn your degree in evolutionary biology? I suspect that you didn't.\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "WOW are we seeing the softer, gentiler Jyoshu? \r\nYour snoopy avatar must be afecting you :) :p", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Hey, as Collin said, P.Z. registered, and got it. I would say that booting him out is the height of hypocrisy. It confirms to be that it is based on a lie, and the producer knows it. The movie was making a claim that the 'opposition' was silencing I.D., and the presentation of alternate ideas. Yet, what do they do? They kicked someone out they INTERVIEWED for the movie (based on false pretenses to be sure, but they did pay him for appearing in the movie).That sounds that THEY are the ones trying to suppress opposing ideas, not science. Yes, they had the legal right. But, boy did it put egg on their face, considering everything. It shows them to be hypocrites and liars.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "True, but the one after this one will be. I think many sane people see the writing on the wall which shows this health care bill only gives you the costs of the current US system with the defects of a universal system. I'm not much for conspiracy theories but if I were I'd think the government was purposely driving health care off a cliff to get universal care in place. ", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "more from unkerpaulie's list: 'world net daily' is a 'medical/scientific institution'????????????????????? from the website: unbiased??????????????????? really, unkerpaulie, i am surprised you didn't list fred phelps website in your 'medical/scientific institutions' list.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "is that the best you can do simone? i think the games up for you old girl! i used to do volunteer work for the samaritans in england and we had a few callers like you. it sometimes takes a while to suss out a fantasist but you do eventually!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Actually I really don't depend on the entertainment industry to give me a realistic picture of anything. I highly recommend you don't, either. What I know about gay people is from knowing gay people.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Which is why the \"medical establishment\" endorses smoking, drinking heavily and a fatty diet, with no excercise, because they believe we are predestined by our genes, right? Why do you persist with these blatant lies?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "so you are into pommy bashing now? mae honey, is there anybody you don't like? emoticonXRolleyes", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Then you would have to be believe that out of the supposed millions upon millions of people who walked the Earth none of them were pregnant and there were no newborns either. Then again, to be Christian, you also have to believe the world was created in 7 days and their was a Biblical great flood too. The best part about writing a fairytale is that the author gets to make up everything as they go along.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You evidentally didn't grasp the apparently immense complexity and vagueness of my post.\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "It is clearly not a strawman argument. I think he doesn't know what \"straw man\" means and I think he is meaning to say \"red herring.\"It isn't a red herring either; it's a perfectly logically related question. I would guess he doesn't see that as he neither understands evolution nor bacterial resistance and, thus, the relationship.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well, it does take some scientific knowledge to understand the evidence for evolution. One doesn't expect Creationists to possess it.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yeah, and we all know what happened when they did that with Galileo. emoticonXRolleyes", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And you think this a good thing? It just shows the weak cowardly position of the creationist.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "That sort of warms the cockles of my heart. Namely that some Europeans might be disinclined to visit or stay here. Don't let the door hit you in the buttocks on the way out.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well, since you've called those who've disagreed with you here stupid (and variations thereof), and insinuated that they're too stoned to understand you, I think you have the most ground to make up. You also provide no support for your statements, most of which were debunked years ago as drug czar propoganda.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "anthony, why do you put quotes around the complete meat of your response? you make it impossible to just hit the quote button and respond to your replies individually? if you don't know how to use the quote feature then pm someone and ask them to explain it to you. here is a link to a response i happened to have made to you and reposted in my profile. because the quote feature doesn't work there, you can see how the post is constructed. check it out and use that style for creating a test post while breaking up and quoting another persons reply for practice. 4forums.com political debates and polls - view profile: archangel", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "What's sick is your theological comprehension.\r\nGod took Ananias and Sapphira (Acts chapter 5) off the earth just for lying. And you want to give JFK, the serial adulterer, a pass? That's how lame your theological thinking is.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "The last known passenger pigeon died in 1914. Your attempt to inflame the discussion fails on the grounds of utter stupidity. Might as well be asking if he bagged a tasmanian tiger, or a chupacabra, or the mothman.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "It is abundantly clear to me now that you are either too stupid to understand my point, or you are too chicken to address it.\r\nOr maybe both.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "so, who's to say we're not philosophers? that's the second time i've seen you back out of a debate. i think these questions are importnat, i also think you can live a life with these questions and enjoy life to the fullest as well. in fact, i think you are missing a facet of life by not asking these questions. isn't the whole agnostic theory to ask questions, to seek the answer that is most likely not there? i think you are disillusioned. were you raised agnostic? if not obviously you had to ask some questions to get there. anyway, mystery makes life interesting. i think life would be a waste without mystery.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "and yet you are angry over the ruling so all you can fling out as ammo is the judges orientation. nothing based upon the merits of the case or the details from both sides but only the fact that he is gay. coming from you i'm not surprised in the least. oh and wonderful quotations insisting being out is a detriment and saying someone is jumping out of normallicy simply because they support marriage equality..", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "you know, i'm astonished at the fact that during an osce conference on combating discrimination and promoting mutual respect and understanding that took place in bucharest early in june, the attendees discussed all sort of things except the flagrant current situation in poland this country gains the lead among european countries in violation of human rights in terms of anti-semitism, racism, hatred to moslems, xenophobia, homophobia, and discrimination against hiv-positive persons. this fact was evinced in poland's country report on human rights practices-2006 released by us department bureau of democracy, human rights, and labor. here i present you part of the report that has relevance to the subject. to put it short, there are quite a lot of people in poland who suffer persecution jews, non-europeans (arabs, moslems, africans, roma), persons of alternative sexuality and hiv-positive persons.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "did she say that she needed it? or did she say: 'without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school,' she said. 'for a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that's practically an entire summer's salary.' do you even know if fluke is sexually active? no, you don't...and frankly it's none of your business. she is advocating for women, not begging for a personal handout. whether you agree with her or not, you have no basis to call her a slut or any other slur you can come up with. law student makes case for contraceptive coverage : shots - health blog : npr to regulate menstrual cycles? to control ovarian cysts? perhaps to do all 3?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Careful, your double-standard is showing. When MEN attempted to make jokes in the past, you accused US of being mysogenistic, remember? If not, I can link you back to your own words. It seems your selective indignation is a one way street. emoticonXRolleyes Oh, and my superglue comment was made as a response to a WOMAN's (or at least I think Simone's a woman) comment about stapling a woman's legs shut. :)", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well, I forgot to add one thing: a legal notice to the gov't about such behavior.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yet another case of inability to answer. tsk, tsk, tsk\r\nYet another \"proofs\". LOL", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "quote from simone 'and, being forced to carry to term and give birth to the spawn of a rapist compounds the harm of the rape many times over.' have you thought about therapy darling ?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "You can start your own thread on how historical the Gospel accounts, etc., are. \r\nHow about dealing with the question now instead of running scared and going down another rabbit trail?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well, my point is that they (I, you, or any collector) shouldn't be forced but rather, that it is a smart thing to do in order to make sure you are not selling a firearm to a felon (which could land you in prison).", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Oh, he doesn't want abortion, huh? If you take the Old Testament to be true, you just lied here. Let's look, shall we?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And I challange you to find just one instance where he's ever claimed that ALL fossils have ALWAYS been found at precisely the right depth. And then link to it, of course. It will be amusing to see how you misinterpreted whatever was actually said.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "i'm not enthralled to go to school. i really don't enjoy the experience. i do, though, know that it would be better for me and everyone else that goes to school. we can't depend on our country just being good, we have to actually do something to make it that way. education is the easiest way to do that. and, just for the record, i do go to summer school. where i live, summer school is only two periods per day, and i can only take certain classes. it really sucks. but, we have to look at the big picture. i don't like many of my classes, and i don't like many of my teachers. but i'm not going to sacrifice my education for comfort or the ability to relax, at least not in high school. think about it. i'm sure you'd agree.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "No, you are mistaken. Evolution is concerned with the change in allele frequency over time. The age of the Universe is irrelevent.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well, we'll ignore the fact that you think dinos are the same as modern day reptiles, and we'll ignore the fact that you are assuming that what goes today must have gone before (something you rant against on a daily basis). Who said anything about reptiles or dinosaurs?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "All sin undermines society, including illicit gay sex sin. Or have you forgotten Sodom and Gomorrah? Coming to a San Francisco bath house near you.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well, I am a parent too; three sons. So what is your point? You think I am incapable of reproducing? I have their birth certificates. emoticonXRolleyes \"Bible\"??? I hold Robert A. Heinland in high regard too. And Ayn Rand. And James Mitchner. And William Shakespeare. And Isaac Asimov. So what is your point?So, I should also assume you have only had sex with the intention of producing a child; in the missionary position only?????????????", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Actually, I pulled the number out of the air for illustrative purposes only, but after reading the CBO report, I see that I wasn't far off. They predicted 600,000 gay couples would want to get married it allowed.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Felony possession of a firearm is five years in prison. Gun trafficking is ten years per gun. Murder brings the death penalty. None of these punishments are handed down for the crimes that get committed.\r\n \r\n It's a matter of quantity over quality.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "What has this got to do with the non-material world, of which God and you and I are a part of?I know that the Apostles witnessed God's miracles. I too am witness to God's miracles. The evidence is adequate for me and for much of the world's population... even many scientists (including evolutionists). You are in a loud minority, railing against the irrational hoards about you.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Bliss.\r\nThank you forum creators for the \"ignore user\" function. Now I can balance the scales,... one from the right and one from the left.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "That is a completely subjective assessment. Thelmoose and Unkerpaulie were already quick to dissociate themselves from any smugness or self righteousness on this very thread. \r\nIt's a schism! I'm filing for their excommunication! emoticonXWow", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Really? What book is that, because I have seen no quotes or links to any source of any info at all from you anywhere above on this page. So once again accipiter, what in the world are you referring to? You and the obvious child oughta get along fine since you both offer nothing more substantial than personal attacks which are based on your own warped beliefs and corrupted interpretations of that which you disagree with. Here's my original post again, I challenge you to explain how these alleged stone age sheep herders whom you scoff at and mock described contemporary living creatures which paleontologists today identify as dinosaurs, from skeletal remains?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Oh you can can you? I of course forgot that your statements are by default right and mine are by default wrong or else I wouldn't have made such a silly assertion :p\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "believe me, dear sir: there is not in the british empire a man who more cordially loves a union with great britain than i do. but, by the god that made me, i will cease to exist before i yield to a connection on such terms as the british parliament propose; and in this, i think i speak the sentiments of america. thomas jefferson, november 29, 1775", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "yeah a spending problem increasing our deficit by 800 billion dollars by not taxing the muckety mucks that outsource american jobs to china. oh and where is this borrowed revenue coming from to lets the super rich get a break? china. what are the walton's the owners of wal mart getting by this deal? a 32 billion dollar tax break! i wonder what we could do with 32 billion dollars hmm? you think their going to increase employee wages? healthcare? pump it back into the economy? hell no.... what a scandle. it's the end of this country as we flippin know it people and personally it makes my stomach hurl. go ahead easy. beg the walton's for your lost job back, or your wages, or to pay for your kids books out of charity when the state funds run dry.... go ahead and beg....", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Very simple. Among all the information about how genetics and hence evolution work, was the claim that the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology is out-of-date. It's SOP. Take one sentence out of a whole publication that opposes your theory, misinterpret it, and declare victory. Helped by the terminology. Evo dogma dethroned!!! Well, that's the end of it, when the dogma is gone, there is nothing left. Because he thinks we think like him, where if the Creation myth in Genesis falls, then all of religion and morality fall with it. Or in our case, all of secularism and immorality fall with the CD of MB. Because thinking the way scientists or non-Creationists Christians do is incomprehensible and evil, and what else is there?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "How about getting the government out of marriage entirely? That is the goal of the libertarians, and maybe the liberals. No standards would be redefined if that happened, and gays would get their right to marry.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "truth can be found in god. we as humans have a relative idea of what truth is because everyone will not agree on what is truth and what is not. for instance, one might say that europe will regain world power or that america will remain the world power but if everyone doesn't believe it how true is it? but universal truth can be considered aboslute such as math. 1 + 1 is 2, 12 inches equal a foot, etc. the question will remain to be unanswered until god reveals what truth is.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "This assumes brain-dead is a logical choice to consider one dead. Even so, it proves nothing about when life begins. What says they have to be the same? This is a classic example of a conclusion not following from the premise.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Origins of science, whether truly started by those of faith or not, is irrelevant. Whatever science was, it has become a body of knowledge, through application of reason.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Actually, evolution occurs on the level of the population: individuals don't change, but populations do. See the examples above.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Really? I suspect that you have been duped by creationist ministers. There is no hype about Miller/Urey. It was an interesting experiment that demonstrated possibilities.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well! I guess that just showed you guys. It seems that HeavenBound thinks that having a closed mind is a bad thing. And yet,", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Not afraid of anything... I want them and buy them because I CAN. They all have different uses and history I collect some of them for that reason.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Since evolution is a non-theistic theory (it does not consider if there is a god or not), you will have to look at some like http://www.theistic-evolution.com/I would also look up Kenneth MIller on the web... a highly Christian biologist who defends evolution.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": " and in the case of all prenatal medicine it is the pregnant woman who is the patient not the fetus. Shouldn't a doctor be able to act in the interests of the patient without fear of imprisonment? IIRC this was the issue most important to Justice Harry Blackmun (a conservative appointed by Richard Nixon) who authored the court's opinion on Roe v. Wade.The Roe v. Wade Opinion\" a doctor can't kill someone else to save the life of another, so I would say that is probably not a good arguement. Not only that, find \right to privacy\" in the constitution...oh wait not there. Guess its on the back.\" ", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "It's NOT any of my business, but when presenting information to the readers at large, such topics need to be ####ing addressed, something militant pro-abortionist seldom want to bring up. I'm actually happy that you had a good operation and think more should go into ensuring ALL women have the same low risk proceedures when necessary. We're dealing with health aspects, all, not just selective. And there may even be things I'm not aware about to consider.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well, if they've re-established control in New Orleans(and it seems they have), then taking a gun away from someone carrying it on the street would be what the police normally do in any city. If they were taking it away from peoples' homes, and not letting them keep them, that would be over and above what they normally do. (I'm very pro-2nd Amendment, so don't get me wrong here. I'm just pointing out that taking guns away from people happens in every city every day)I also think that it's kind of disingenuous to complain about the military coming in--just a week ago everyone was criticizing the govt. for NOT sending in the military. Now people are criticizing them for doing it???", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "When he was standing there on the podium accepting his Nobel prize I could tell he was thinking to himself, \"If I could just get a little bit of respect from Jim's Trucking, not necessarily admiration, just a little respect...........................\" ;)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well said. Most Americans favor more gun control, but unfortunately this majority of Americans tends not to vote based on the issue of gun control while a very vocal minority composed of gun activists definitely does vote based on the issue. This is something politicians have realized since 1994 so they have been more hesitant to support gun control. There probably will be more gun control supporters in office in the coming years but I'm not sure how much this will change things.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "did you read the artical? to show our children that they are no different then any other.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "(My evidence does not require this quote, it's for comparison only)The theory of evolution is based on evidence, the existence of god, is not..Reason cannot be applied to it. Furthermore, since evolution relies on reason, faith cannot be applied to it. To attempt to label science as a faith is a contradiction. I know it irks you that your faith cannot be proven, but that's the definition of faith!! It wouldn't be faith without it. As Montalban says in a contradiction of motives: His particular faith does not rest on the foundations of [reason]. Why then look for support from reason?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "depends on what you mean by 'history'. did george washington really cut down the cherry tree? that is fiction. did george washington exist? that is documented.. and is history.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Hehe. Putting political messages on such things seems retarded to me though. -Wez", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Historical record says that there was a wedding ceremony and that Nero in fact married not one but Two of his male slaves... one he was the bride the other time he was the groom. \r\nWhether you like it or not the question was answered.. You were and still remain proven wrong... \r\nThe only dimwit in this thread is you and wanting to marry your mother and/or your sister makes you the pervert... so you just struck out dumbass...\r\nemoticonXGoodemoticonXGoodemoticonXGoodemoticonXGood", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Over 10,000 signatures of Christian Clergy have been collected, and have endorsed this letter.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Ah, so we shouldn't get all stirred up because little girls are singled out for slaughter?Please excuse me for having misplaced priorities.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "no one believes this. this is a non-issue. i'm not surprised you would respond that way jyoshu. you don't take these issues seriously at all. thus you can have a good laugh, and be sarcastic and think you are witty. in reality, it shows how clueless you are in terms of gay issues. 'the equality-obsessed modern gay pride movement'? gays don't have equality, and therefore there is a movement for that. i don't think anyone is obsessed with equality. i could just as quickly say there is an obsession with keeping gays in an unequal status.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "There is just one thing however. The coelacanths found are different from those in the fossil record. Further, ALL evidence pointed to them being extinct, until we found other evidence, and we changed it. And, to top it off, the article says NEARLY extinct, not COMPLETELY. Although, this article was of course written after the coelocanths were re-discovered. Of course, this has absolutely nothing to do with the theory of evolution, which explains the mechanisms responsible for the change of allele frequencies in populations over time.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "1) Charliegone's article was a published research article.I would love to know where \"NARTH's\" editorial was published, if it even was published.2) NARTH's article DID NOT show any \"higher homosexual activity\" because of legalized gay marriage.It thoroughly failed to show ANY rise in homosexuality in ANY \"gay marriage\" country. It showed some studies which were reportedly done in those countries, but that's it.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "i keep thinking the same thing. the only conclusions i can come up with is that either the criminals are robbing people they have good reason to believe are unarmed, or that there haven't been enough deaths to violent home intruders to let them know that they're facing a serious health crisis. he didn't get shot the first time, he likely believed that she wasn't armed and wouldn't be able to resist any better than the last time; especially since he cut her power off the second time. interesting angle. i like it. we've got suicide by cop, why not suicide by victim? i sure thing he did, and i don't feel sorry for him.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Evolution wasn't introduced until 1859. When did abortion become popular? The industrial revolution occurred in the 1800s. Maybe that was the cause of abortion's alleged popularity. Grover Cleveland was elected in the 1800s. Clearly he had something to ", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "And we have been down this road. Person can mean a living human...which the embryo is. So like human, you can have person mean the organism itself.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well speed is homegrown and the profits stay within the US. Then there is the productivity benifits of having a jacked up population that never sleeps and can do manual tedious labor for days on end", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Did I mention premarital or adulterous heterosexual sex?\r\nI think not!\r\nAs usual 'big' boy is putting words in others posts!\r\nWas better when I was on his ignore list..for about five minutesemoticonXConfused", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Are you blind, or can't you read? NATO just provided evidence right now.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Oh, I don't think there's anything wrong with it, I'm completely for it.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "WOO HOO.\r\nSo the main stream entertainment industry who brought us such great talent as Brittney Spears does not consider this film the cats meow? WEE HA - all the more reason to see it.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Actually, natural selection tends to preserve a species with only minor changes in a stable environment. But environments tend to change. I don't know what that \"incipient organ\" junk is supposed to mean. Is that another way of saying \"what good is half a wing.\" Well, check out a penguin to find out. Look at a seal flipper. It has the same bones, arranged in the same way as a monkey. What good is it for a land animal? And what does \"fully functional\" mean? What function? Perhaps the new organ had a different purpose - take the clawed hands of fossil birds for example. They were good for catching prey and climbing, just like they were for their dinosaur ancestors. But those clawed wings also allowed early birds to fly.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yes. I believe it's a matter of personal individual freedom. If purchased legally, and not used to commit a crime, what harm comes from handgun ownership? I don't own one, but I own many other guns. If they can ban handguns, what's to stop them from banning shotguns, or even BB guns? I don't believe in a nanny state, taking away my toys \"for my own good\". Waxy", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "then prove me wrong. you want respect? then earn it. i'll give it to you if you stop meaninglessly attack me with your insults. i'm serious, i'll calm down the second you start delivering real arguments. and 'standard atheist attacks'? wow. you're so close minded, aren't you?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "The memo is real, nobody has ever been able to disprove it. Handgun Control Inc. (the people who later became the Brady Campaign) have claimed that the memo is a hoax and that what was released has never been their official position. However them simply stating this, is no different than Obama making a statement on national news, and then several months later saying \"I never said that\" and trying to reverse his position.Until it can be proven beyond doubt as being untrue and simple propaganda, the memo is real and explains in detail exactly what the gun control groups are after.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "does the grand canyon strike you as a 'crack' as well? like? what makes them so dangerous if it ain't their guns and their willingness to use them? this assumes that no da is presently going after them. something i highly doubt. diversionary tactic on your part. wouldn't making guns harder for them to acquire be helpful?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "If he lies about being pro-life, what else will he be willing to lie about in order to be elected? That is a legitimate, not-made-up issue that is relevant to elections.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "To the extent that working toward social change on any moralistic issue is an 'imposition', sure. But I think one could say that about anything that has a social effect.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh sure there is. you would just have a lot of angry off people though.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "What part of \"I don't want a penis\" do you not quite understand? \r\nIs it that maybe you are the one who wants a penis? There are ways to resolve that issue. emoticonXRolleyes", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Actually, that's what they call most of the people that come in to contact with me.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "he can't sin, get a teenage girl knocked up on a one night stand, but not sin. slaughter innocents personally or command his followers to do so but can't sin. oh yes he isn't very good at watching out for his kids. i mean look at adam and eve and then he got another chance with jesus and look how that turned out. and see above for other things he can't do.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "I don't think that Bill Clinton has to \"force\" himself upon women. It's more like fighting off the women who want to leap into bed with Bill Clinton.\r\nTed Kennedy has spent a lifetime repenting of his drunkenness and has proved himself a valuable public servant to the American people.\r\nNow, when are you going attack doddering old, near-to-death Robert Byrd and castigate him for something he'd done when he was a young and naive young man?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "If we did not have criminals, we wouldnt have \"shoot outs\" as you so call them.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "an infant isn't capable of living on its own even after being delivered. what level of support differentiates 'developed enough' from not developed enough? the age in which a premature baby can be kept alive is down in the 5 1/2 month range now and will likely drop further as science continues to progress. so is the distinction that you make based on today's science or something eelse?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Bad comparisons. A fair comparison would be comparing the total number of defensive gun uses to the total number of gun crimes (not just limiting it to gun homicides).", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Not by any means. Evolution works on genetic change that future generations will inherit. Adaptation does no such thing. It changes an individual, but not its genes.For example, if my parents volunteered to be part of a scientific experiment where they two additional arms fused onto their body before I was ever conceived, I would not be born with two extra arms.On the other hand, if a genetic mutation made it advantageous to have two additional arms, and both my parents had that mutation, I would be born with both arms.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "BOY-HOWDY!!!!! You have spoken the truth and spoken it well. Welcome to you from the conservative South.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "This coming from someone that is very choosy in the question that they answeremoticonXRolleyes", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "yeah! its a benefit to be able to do a thing like that. i'm amazed that we've come so far in technology and science, but i think there is a line of what we can offer people. its not like they're gonna chose whether they want to have an egg or a bagel for breakfast.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "The Christian community DOES have a split on the issue. Not all Christians believe gays should be the target of Christian homophobic attacks and discriminatory legislative efforts.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And I'm guessing by your misinformed posts that you have not been high before. Did you recently watch a film called Reefer Madness by any chance?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You don't want anyone saying gay people are whacked, but you will make it your business to insult someones religion?! You are a hypocrite!! You say,\"Don't judge gays!\" But you are judging people by their religon?! I thought you were more mature then that. Hey you live ad learn.emoticonXRolleyes", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yeah, it is really difficult to cut and paste a news article onto the forum. Look at the gun page, he is nothing more than a bot.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "A slimey claim you cannot support as usual. In developed Nations, the U.S. is far down the list as has been posted on this very board at least 5 times. Those 'other' Nations also have far more crime and violent crime than the U.S.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well I think that god must be a bit confused since he also says....Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves. Numbers 31:17-18He doesn't seem to mind at least some retroactive abortions....", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "wow, this was up to 6 points at one time. down-voting it without a rebuttal surely refutes it.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yes and no. Metaphorical creationism can't be disproved period as there are no hard facts to disprove. Literal creationism can be disproven on a number of factors, from the timeline, to events such as the flood.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Not even let white people in? I can imagine why your teacher suggested a reality check.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "No, quite clearly you are wrong, he is saying Countless people, facing persecution the world over - people living and those as yet unborn\". \"And\" those that are not born yet. Can you not read? He includes them with the \"AND\". Why do you think he spent his life protecting the unborn and children? You ought to read what it says. Furthermore, the human rights act, specifically talks about protecting the unborn too. You lose", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "which one is this brady? the discredited kellerman study by the discredited kellerman? or the opinion piece of the rabidly anti-gun brady campaign? cite your sources. and answer the damn question already. is self-defense with a firearm an immoral act? it's not rocket science, there's only two answers; yes or no.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "only two choices? poor god, infinity reduced to black or white.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "so who should make the choice in the scenario you propose? for me, it must always and forever be the woman. btw, why is it in your example that the man is not the one who refused to use birth control? in any case, i do not want the nanny state involved in the most intimate choice a woman will ever have to make. btw, who is simone?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh, so you can point out where i argued that birds were the apex species? no? what a shock you're right, right now, humans are the apex species. but (and i know you don't get this part), we are not the most evolved. all extant species are equally as evolved.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "I guess banning drugs are also a tyranny then. Why dont you fight against the laws in US that restricts drug-use?\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "hey i just aked a question ....... you think im evil , how would your mum have felt reading half the shit that comes out of your mouth. pfht fuck you darling. oh and i love you.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "god has emotions wow. that has got to be ridicules thing i heard in the old days you talked like that they would send you to a cuckoo farm. god loves you god hate s you etc etc etc. what a bunch of hog wash. what do people mean by that? you would think god sat down and had breakfast with you or something like that. emoticonxwow", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "People make mistakes (excepting some pro-evolutionists who respond with anger and blame others of 'twisting their words'.)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Just as you were stating that it was not as an example, so was I stating that it was to me as an example. So, your reasoning that we can know if it is or is not a person is because people disagree on whether or not it is? That theory could use a bit more explanation.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Good, you can address the claims made here, too.\r\n \r\n ETA: Also see how the movie's version lines up with the information here regarding Sternberg.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "are you saying you only have a hard time having compassion for the gay victims of sexually transmitted illness? if, so that just shows your anti-gay prejudice. what difference does that make? everyone who has aids is a victim. in some communities and in other countries, the majority who have it are straight. against the victims from the largest social group of victims in each jurisdiction? this is nothing more than prejudice and destructive political agenda. i would hope there are other, better, human instincts inside of you.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "So taking peoples rights away is an american value? I think I will push for legislation to make cancer surgery illegal. After all cancer cells are human life too and with modern medical tech they could become a human being also.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yet he hasn't. No pro-choice person I know wants abortion to be prevalent, they just want it to be an option. Wanting it safe and rare and available is not an abnormal positon for a pro-choice person.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "wow i really have to thank you for being so thorough with your explanations... they totally change the fact that you're comparing murder to interrogation tactics. please draw us another hyperbola, mr. hyperbolan :)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "While that definition of sin is true, the Hebrew definition means missing the mark. You could stretch it to mean unfit in English.And you're technically wrong about the bible. Modernly it is one book, but bible means little books. For a time they were floating around in clusters. So academically they are self contained and unrelated. The apocryphal books are \"secret\" books. Religious scholars eventually decided they were just a bunch of stories, and most never made it in the bible. Look at Song of Solomon it made the cut, and people still have problems with it being put in, yet it conflicts with nothing.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "It is so the womans decision. If the baby is in the womb they haven't experience life, so how can they miss it. And if they are a so called \"soul\" then they will come out somewhere else.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "and who was on vacation when the memo from intelligence forewarned about the impending attack???? oh yes...george w. bush. who left the american troops in saudi araba??? oh yes....george herbert walker bush. whose father was a banker for adolph hitler...oh yes, again ghw bush.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Are you just not bright enough to make the connection between:\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "No it isn't. There was an incident here in the states last year that had an elderly woman beaten and raped, and several days later her rapist came back to do it again and she killed him on the spot. She wasn't brought to court to face trial even know she killed someone.THAT is how something like this should be handled.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So how many locusts, beetles etc. were there on the Ark? Do you think that there were a pair of each species, or just a pair of each \"Biblical Type\" and could you define what is meant by that term? Would that include all beetles/insects/arthropods/invertebrates or just anything you felt was convenient?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Great way of twisting what I said. Would you like a Snickers bar?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Where is the government in this? Clinicians made a clinical decision, and hid behind a non-mandatory guideline, which was set by other more senior clinicians, expert in their field. Assuming the woman's very detailed recall of the stressful series of events is accurate, perhaps it was God's way of telling this unmarried mother that after five previous miscarriages, she still wasn't getting the message.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "BUt it comes down to gay people being harmed by not being allowed to marry. Any time a group is excluded because of someone elses religious beliefs that group is harmed.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Let's see how dillusional this claim is. Answer me these questions: How many of his actual crew are aganist Kerry? How many of these anti-Kerry's are being paid? How many of these anti-Kerrys haven't changed their own stories? Besides, memory is a bad subsitute for hard evidence. In the case aganist Bush, no one remembers him doing anything important. In fact, many people don't even remember him at all. ", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "How do you know it is him? It's a simple question. IF he is writing as Lurch, and someone else comes onto a board, as Ungerdunn, who is just as rude (which is what you are saying), you assume it's the same person? Or, is it because they both claim to be biologists? I guess that having another person enter a forum, and claim to be a biologist would narrow it down to just the same person emoticonXClown All you've done is said you know it is him because one writer is as rude as the other... and that this gives his identity away by some mysterious process, probably I don't understand this as I've never read set-theory! emoticonXWow What should be a very easy question becomes you repeating \"I know it is him\".Also, has he been banned as Lurch on these other fora?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "pay attention to what ? to the voices in your head ? \r\nyour age is irrelevant to your recognized lack of intelligence, but being a minor would be relevant since it would excuse your ignorance.\r\nMy advice to you ?\r\nkeep all your life pretending in forums that you are just a kindergarten kid and therefore people would think that for a 4 year old kid you are not too dumb and of course knowing nothing is understandable.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "do you mean when pelosi said the protestors had nazi banners, when they were actually banners saying 'no' to nazism? she's in the democrats. you mean the fantasy land whitehouse version of the proposals, that no one has actually read? no one that understands the constitution would say that, that's a very ignorant comment. what's perverted is that you think freedom of speech means the people have to shut up while they listen patiently to the government propaganda machine.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "QUOTE oh yeah god is the root of all evil! tell that to the person who was about to murder their spouse for cheating but refrained from doing so because they believe that god is watching.END QUOTE how about that damn evil mother theresa too now why would someone murder an adulteress in the first place? oh, right! the bible punishes adultery with death. mother teresa was no longer faithful at the time of her death. she realised the lack of voice of jesus, the lack of presense.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well, we have Noah and his family getting off the Ark after the great flood. But no mention of Gilgamesh writers. They obviously weren't born yet.\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well, one can't be truly logical and not be an atheist (or at least agnostic.) As any religion simply flys in the face of logic. Faith and logic are poles apart.\r\n \r\n Keep truckin' Jim! Happy weekend to you bro.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I didnt believe! I just didnt disbelieve!\r\nI hoped!\r\nLike I have said through out, you need to be open to the possibility.\r\nIf you believe there is no God and refuse to be open to the possiblty otherwise..All I can say is I hope you find peace in your BMW in your Big House, your carer, your boy/girlfriend, your wife/husband, your son/daughter...your small little life!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "The way I read it is that he has disdain for wars which could possible be avoided. It's interestng that one side of the thought process is patriotic, the others have disdain for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.\r\nWill we never think above a 1st grade level?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And that is why there is no plutonium found in the natural (fossil) fission reactors discovered in Oklo, Gabon in Africa.A fission reaction in the presence of U-238 always produces plutonium. In fact, about 1/3 of the energy output from a typical reactor in the U.S. comes from the fission of plutonium-239 that is created by the fission of U-235. When there is not enough fissionable material left in the fuel to sustain a reaction, there always remains several isotopes of plutonium that were not present in the original enriched uranium fuel.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I just bet you thought you were smart just now? I'll go you several... \r\nHow about:\r\n1. Murder\r\n2. Stealing\r\n3. Adultery\r\n4. Rape\r\nAlmost every culture since the dawn of civilization has put to death those who have trespassed those basics. But I guess you didn't get that on the Recovery Channel huh? Your idiocy is profound only as your ignorance.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "But...but... I just swallowed 56 zygotes so that they could vote by proxy through me for the Ripofflican(tm) party this upcoming election so they can win. Now I'm going to have all that indigestion for nothin'. As to driving...don't care. What I'll miss most is all of those credit card offers that come in their names. There's just so much that they, living though me want to 'buy now and pay later' on. You saying they can't do that?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "ooo, the slippery slope argument! always a classic. the right to not be discriminated against based on her sexual orientation perhaps? what part of the dress code was she going to violate? she was going to wear formal wear. it's not like she was going to show up in ripped jeans and a slipknot t-shirt. rules designed to exclude her. their wishes don't supersede her rights.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "If DOMA isn't declared unconstitutional, then those arguing against Prop 8 are micturating into the wind.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Wasn't that your boy, Clinton, that screwed the intern? Or was it Mayor Sam Adams of Portland who screwed a 17 year old intern? No wait, it couldn't have been Adams, that intern was a boy. emoticonXRolleyes\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "if we killed more people that were guilty of their crime more people would not want to commit the crime because of the circumstances. if they don't care about the circumstances they are insane. 'i think, about what they've done wrong in society is by teaching/encouraging/inspiring them, not killing.' so you want the government to brainwash them? are you kidding me? what planet do you live on?! 'oh, you killed someone but we're not going to punish you at all you just have to go to therapy.' you're joking right?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "No thanks. There are other ways to meet dates. It's very easy for gays to meet dates that are not officially gay.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Of course it's solely a product of women's behavior simone. It's the women that has to make the phone call to the stork. The stork doesn't answer calls from men.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "my wife and i watch it faithfully, and there are very few shows that i make a point of watching. we've seen all of seasons 1 and 2 twice now. it really is an excellent program. any word on season 3? i notice kevin mckidd (lucius vorenus) has his own show premiering on nbc in the fall. i'm not sure how he could film both shows at once, and rome wouldn't be the same without him. he and titus pullo make the show for me. i can't imagine what the show costs to produce per episode with all the sets, cameras, and wardrobe, but the visual presentation of the show is incredible. it brings ancient rome to life. i imagine the price tag is one of the main reasons there aren't more shows like it. waxy", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "They were both created on the sixth day according to Genesis 1.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Throw off our conclusions about what? I'm getting a bit confused as to what you're trying to cast doubt upon. Dark matter is stuff that doesn't interact via the electromagnetic force, so again by definition anything that we can't 'see' using EM waves i", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "But my point is that the Supreme Court has disagreed. Hence the illegitimate legal doctrine of substantive due process, which maintains that the due process clause can be violated even in cases where due process has been given.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Gosh am I a little late?Anyhow if Comrade P. isn't anything but humor,thats why we put up with him,eh.Do you think he even has a clue?:p", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "There were no contradictory accounts on that, just descriptions on a linear timeline. I suppose you see ghosts around every corner too.\r\nAre you a 9/11 Truther too?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So then women who are pregnant shouldn't be allowed to 1) Smoke 2) Take any kind of drug that could possibly harm the child 3) Drink or do any otherwise legal action? And VOR takes another giant step towards fascism.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "They used to keel over regularly before modern medicine and my wife has been on medication for a thyroid condition ever since she delivered.\"During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, between 1 percent and 1.5 percent of all births ended in the mother's death as a result of exhaustion, dehydration, infection, hemorrhage, or convulsions. Since the typical mother gave birth to between five and eight children, her lifetime chances of dying in childbirth ran as high as 1 in 8. This meant that if a woman had eight female friends, it was likely that one might die in childbirth.\"", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Spoken as though it is any of your, my, or the law's concern.\r\nWhy not tell the forum why your opinion on a metaphysical question should be law in the universe.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Have you lost your mind? I got no idea what you are talking about.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Actually, that story was an invention after the fact. It never happened. At least that is what the witnesses who were there said. Why do christians feel that it is OK to invent such stories to support their point? Isn't that lying? Isn't lying wrong?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well, your reasoning is certainly muddled, and it seems to be confused with some sort of twisted socio-political agenda, but I don't think I would characterize your piece a filthy collage. But you can call you stuff what you want.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yes, but we had no way to tell until we found them again, now had we?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "If by \"We the People\" you mean a handful of self appointed persons with strong financial intrest in the running of the country... \r\nThe document is largely a copy of the theories of Montesqieu and John Locke.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Ah, so I don't like democracy, and yet it is you who in the post are telling me that I have to support McCain's statement. Are you serious? That sure doesn't sound like democracy to me. I also find it funny that you claim that I don't like democracy when my very post stated that I would be voting for the Democrat party. But then, I guess if we don't support Bushyboy and his fellow republicanazis, we must be against democracy, right? Get real, Phyllis.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "so in support of a government run health care program for all american citizens, you bring us an example of a government run health care program for our veterans that according to the article is failing to provide adequate care to those veterans, and consequently causing them to die. can you just imagine how much more comfortable i am with the idea of the government getting into the private sector health care business? bravo antonia. emoticonxgood", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "But the civil war wasn't fought for slavery. If you will recall the average northern soldier wasn't too fond of blacks, and that is not only sugar coating it, but saying it in the nicest terms possible. The civil war was fought to keep the union in tact. Border states still kept their slaves for obvious reasons, the intactness of the union trumped any moral principal. Besides, that wasn't true even in practice. Black soldiers were paid less, had less equipment, had less medical care and were given the worst jobs possible. Hardly created equal. It took some time before they could even fight. Your argument is a load of garbage to someone who actually has knownledge about the civil war. I won't even go into the reconstruction period and how your so called principal didn't even exist.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I notice its typos and mispellings that attract slim jim. Not much on the meat and taters of postings. It does get the other country leftists jumping ugly when they see we can purchase so many firearms freely. The pious wringing of hands and croc tears over the murder rate here versus the rate some where else is unbelieveable. Instead of blaming XXXX poor police work and a joke of a criminal justice system it has to be lack of gun control.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "that speaks a lot about you and shows other posters they shouldn't take what you say at face value. yes it does. if i go before congress and say 'being gay is a choice without a doubt made at age 11' and had no evidence than i should be laughed at. same thing as this woman. she makes a claim with no evidence and reason to lie. this makes you not credible. than a legislative body? while probably true, this is sad because newspapers have none.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "If you have evidence for something, what purpose is faith with respect to that thing?Faith is belief with no evidence.Or from the dictionary: Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence.If you verify something scientifically then is it even possible to believe it by faith?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "What didn't you learn in that class that we need to teach you?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh yes a bit on respiration. nematode cysts can go dormant for many years (see anguina triticii) without exhibiting any perceptible respiration or metabolism. so can tardigrades, and many bacteria and fungi. not to mention seed which are dormant sometimes for centuries. are we to conder these objects alive or dead????? are human embryos frozen at liquid n2 temps alive or dead. they certainly are not going to respire at those temps!!!!!", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "it would only be inconsistant is i had abortions for those reasons. others do things i don't approve of all the time. if i don't approve of you owning a gun but i believe in your right to, am i inconsistent? believing in the right and approving of the action are two different things.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Nice spin. Would you have preferred \"the civilized world\" instead? Or Western Civilization or Gay Western Civilization? Your preference? One case in 1959 isn't a pandemic. \r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Really? Show me that by quoting where the article says it.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Because Humphreys went out looking? How many should we allegedly find?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "wikipedia is really quite amazing actually. you see the fact that anybody can modify it as a reason to not trust it. that would be a valid concern if it had only a small number of contributors. but, there are millions of contributors. each going over and correcting information supplied by others. in my mind (given the current number of users) wikipedia is a fantastic peer-reviewed source of information.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Because the location of the tracks used to be a tidal plane. In other words, it used to be at the edge of the ocean. Around that time the sea coast advanced and receded several times. The tracks were buried. The tracks actually had to be uncovered. The tracks were originally discovered immdiately after an unusually severe storm in the area in which an unusual amount of water came down the Paluxy. That unusual flow of water washed away the soil that covered some of the tracks. Other tracks have been intentionally uncovered. For example, in one case, where a trackway went under a bank, several feet of the bank was removed to expose more tracks.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "See my post above, Hi. marc ignores fundamentals of Miller's beliefs that he clearly spells out in trying to push his anti-Miller argument.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And then there's this:Alarm at routine patrols by armed police - Crime, UK - The Independent", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "But of course, according to one singularly deranged poster here, it's the Republicans who are truly pro-gay (they just can't show it, doncha know), while the Democrats are just paying phony-baloney lip service to us...", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "No. The point is that doctors are more dangerous than guns, highlighting the stupidity of the anti-gun crowed who believe that guns should be outlawed because they are “dangerous.”\r\n \r\n Furthermore, if we wanted to include deliberate killing, we", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Hmm, when you say \"numberless\" do you mean something other than the standard definition of infinite? If not, please explain how an infinite number of organisms could be created in a finite time with finite space and resources. Thank you.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Wrongo STILL!\r\nIll explain below, because you continue to misunderstand simple English. It will be easier to confute you there.\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Oh, don't be so hasty Bear in mind that at the scale upon which bacteria operate, molecules are significant physical structures. The bacterial flagellum, for instance, is an outboard motor constructed directly out of proteins, which are in turn directly, physically translated via RNA from DNA sequences. The physical shape of the folded molecular structure of those proteins is what makes the motor work. So there's nothing abstract about the relationship between DNA and the organism's physical form or abilities.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "** nonsense. who's been teaching you your quantum physics?!? ** the reason is called, 'ex nihilo, nihil fit'. what you are saying is called 'magick'. ** which would mean that it came from some where or something and did not 'just happen'. ** a 'quantum fluxuation'(sic)?!? is that some kind of magical cosmological dump, or something?! materialists inventing magic words, or using real words as magical mantras and bumper stickers in oprder to make up for what they haven't got, is getting really old around here. ** so why not call your 'multiverse' , 'god', and be done with it?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "In that case, your idea is already falsified, because there are too many intermediate fossils to count.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Tell us Brady, does the information that While Males ratified the 13th and 14th put a twist in your knickers? emoticonXSmilie", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Butwhat of the fetus/babies that were wanted by daddy but not by mummy what does termination stop then?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "i'm impressed! this is a very precise description, in regular englishand yes, the deduction in 9 seems presumptious if all we state is God has a \"possibility of existence\". how this was cleverly cleared up (from the same source site) was simply a trip back to the definition: \"greatest possible being\". the \"greatest possible being\", by definition, MUST have a possible existence. in otherwords, we cannot assume that there is a possibility that the greatest possible being does not exist. yeah, it sounds like the whole \"proof\" is pointless because your premise is already the proofjust keep in mind that for the purposes of this proof, God is defined as \"the greatest being possible\". as long as that definition is maintained, the proof works...does that mean that God exists? hmmm....emoticonXFrazzled", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Who are these 1400 geologists? Got a list? Got a link other than the kooks? This 1400 number is only mentioned on your linked site. Nowhere else on the internet. Why?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "isn't that amazing that you were the fool all along? oh wait, you are to simple-minded to understand that. carry on.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Nice evasion. Now how about actually responding to my post above which was a response to your prior attack post!!!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I don't have any belief in this area. I don't know how life started and accept that I probably never will know. It might have started through a God \"magicking\" the first cell into existence, it may have started through purely random natural processes or anywhere in between the two. One only has belief and faith in this regard when one claims to know how life started. \"I don't know\" is not belief.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So? The point was that people who support gun control are not necessarily communists.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And where exactly is your proof that \"Stop, don't touch, leave the area, tell an adult\" is indoctrination and translates to \"go out and buy a gun, buy as many guns as possible, obsess over the gun, etc.\"", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And what does that have to do with the price of Tea in SF?emoticonXDonno", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So it's the blog's fault that Miller sided with the creationists. Right-o, marc. (I suspect you haven't even read the blog entry in question; I'd be surprised if you've read more than a paragraph of PZ's blog.. ever.)", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You make it seem as if you are doing me a favor by reading what I post", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Did you forget the other part of the analogy? A trillion dollars is.\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So what's your point, Bush is as Liberal as the most Liberal Senator in Congress?\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh yes you have. if your memory fails you, i can repost your statements.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Technically, all syllogisms need two premises, first of all. \"Step two\" and \"step three\" were a dilemma, not separate steps. Learn to read. Dilemma: You only read Scenario 1, which was: step two -God can create a rock he cannot lift - Step three - God cannot lift the rock conclusion - God is not all powerful Scenario Two was - God cannot create such a rock - Therefore, there is something God cannot do - Therefore, God is not all-powerful The only case in which God could truly be all-powerful is if he can somehow both create an unbreakable rock and then break it, which defies the Law of Non Contradiction and is thus absurd. Thus, the notion of all-powerfulness, which leads to such a notion, is also absurd.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "He may not hate it, but he sure does some strange things WRT it. For example: his World Apology Tour 2009. emoticon_rolleyes", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You betcha. Even JP who usually can defend such stuff has failed. VOR doesn't even bother (not surpisingly consider it requires brain usage) The mere fact they let him do that is damning aganist the Vatican.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Are you trying to be funny in a \"I'm the one who drew attention to this aspect in the first place, but now I'm going to criticize you for talking about what I drew attention to\" type mentality?\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "you know simone, the reasons you give are exactly why, assuming no adverse health issues i'm unaware of, the pill should be otc. why shouldn't a woman be able to pick up a little card like they have for sudafed and get a pack of pills? at $.20 to manufacture you'd probably get a pack for $8-9 a month. at that point the insurance is not necessary and you have lower costs for women (insurance is known to increase cost of medicine). that's the real solution.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "you really do hate the truth, don't you lyte! and you're a teacher? what a scary thought that is based on your twisted world view. emoticonxdonno i have my own video for you to watch, one which doesn't tell you lies by pointing to a couple examples of why 10,000 emails don't expose the fraud which has been perpetrated on humanity for a generation now. youtube - john coleman - global warming scam here's another video where he sues al gore: youtube - al gore sued by over 30.000 scientists for global warming fraud / john coleman", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Alexander, I don't give a rat's rectum about King James. emoticonXBanghead", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "he was in indonesia dear. read his xxxx (my marks) i thought he was as old as the devil??", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "as typical you have it wrong. being an atheist shows your a dumb ass. proof of this is that you are in the military. too dumb to think on your own and have to rely on someone else to tell you when to eat and sleep, i'm impressed. it was constitution not constitution. learn the difference. for spending so much time on-line, you haven't learned a thing. probably military intelligence at work.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "So, no actual source. And Hannity and Colmes? Yeesh, you might as well quote Limbaugh or Coulter or O'Reilly. They're all equally \"fair and balanced\".\r\nAnd the kindergarten \"sex-ed\" was age appropriate. Congrats, you've bought a lie. \r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You're the one who needs to get a grip. Lots could get worse, but not for the reasons you're stating. But I take it you're finally admitting that (actually) 50 million uninsured human beings who could die or go bankrupt is a big problem.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So Archie goes back, sees whether this thread is one of the few where he doesn't spew the namecalling, then asks somebody to restrict himself to citing this thread as if it's a representative sample.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "you're hopeless. what do you thing a stable website in which only authorized personnel have access to would be considered in layman's terms? answer: a secure website.emoticonxbangheademoticonxbanghead i already cited the section of the bill that backs up my statement above, so don't bother trying to refute it.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "i think your right big orn and that is what i was thinking... do you think your level of bitterness has something to do with quality of life? i guess the glass is half empty for those....", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "My house evolved over millions of years. it built itself . Prove me wrong. emoticonXRolleyes", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Strawman. The argument is not to do whatever one wishes with ones body. The argument is soley that one does not have to have another attached, ever, against ones will.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Are you being dense on purpose? I said that I'm not all into the semantics of baby/fetus. I'll conceid that its killing a baby. The TERM for it is fetus, fetus' become babies. I see the logic there (in fact I think I'm agreeing with you). Why must you keep pounding this drum?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "it says that god is not of man so does not lie...it does not state that god is incapable of lying. i would say that the hebrews verse does not say that god is incapable of lying either but you are correct it does say that it is impossible for god to lie meaning there is no possibilty ..not that he is incapable....cant lie ? no it does not say that. a promise is a promise , not a declaration of incapability. god would obviously be capable of breaking that promise and is bound by the oath not incapablility. saying that god cannot die you are applying a limitation to a concept that you do not understand yourself. death does not apply to god.god cannot make infinite plus one ounce either...which is about as ridiculous a statement. death does not mean cease to exist", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Both. It's where a human life begins but not a life yet.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "that's a real laugh, coming from someone with so little knowledge of the legal and justice systems as you. do you even know what goes into obtaining a search warrant? do you know what the limitations are regarding the scope of a search warrant and how it has to be narrowly tailored to something specific and nothing else? right. and it was ca law that lead to a father's children being murdered because he thought he was obligated to keep his guns locked up at all time, making them inaccessible even in a true life or death emergency. it was also california law that proved just how registration can, does and will, lead to confiscation. they proved our case for us and showed everyone that we weren't paranoid, and instead knew exactly what we were talking about.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "I've decided that I will answer this question once and for all if someone can prove to me why people need tennis racquets. If someone can answer this for me, I will attempt the definitive assault weapon response. Have at it.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": " I think the court decision in Nunn vs. State of Georgia did the best summation of this right!\" Yeah, all liberals love overturned court cases that never saw the light through the appeals process. I think Ohio and it's Constitution finally prevailed and now they carry open or concealed.You wasn't on that Cessna were you? ", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Oh, there's no hypocrisy involved, just you being your usual self and not even looking at the actual information (or, more likely, looking at the information and then deliberately playing dumb).", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Really? What a surprise! So tell me. If you don't know what it is or how it works, how do you know that you are opposed to it?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So, you got your tubes tied because \"With womens right's getting shredded in the debate over abortion, fewer and fewer women are going to want to even risk have sex with men at all. It'll cause a wave of abstinence and imprisonment that will cut succesive generations in half. That'll even further errode the solvancy of social security.\" Why would one get their tubes tied if they were swearing off men? emoticonXConfused And do you really believe the rest of the load about imprisonment and SS solvancy erosion, too? emoticonXRolleyes", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "yet everything in that site is cited with sources such as cnn and what not. i understnad the florida right to life is not credible to our discussion(as they are not neutral) however the things they cite are...and that is what you should look at. so murder is a subjective term now...i laugh at that. your point was what again? they fact that vor didn't prove his case and never does? i don't understand....however, maybe if you looked at the sources on that site you would see that it is in the upper 90%s (however this is clinical abortions...not underground ones).", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Ah yes, the 'Let's pull a smug and self serving quote out of context from the bible and use it as in insult, therefore god exist' routine. That arrogant method of using self congratulatory bible quotes to insult and denigrate your opponent is neither an effective debate technique, or does it help convince those people on the boarder line to convert to Christianity. It does drive them away, so please, be my guest and keep on trying to use it. I figure the ratio of people you drove away from Christianity to those people who were converted to Christianity from you must be way lop sided.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I see. So physical punishment for sin is now unnecssary? Intriguing. Do tell. Seriously, I am curious where you go with this.And finally:", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "and what alternate fuel source do you reccommend, o divine oracles? i'd like to see something cheaper in my lifetime. so how long will it take to find something 'better'?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Says the one currently derailing this thread....................... emoticonXDonnoemoticonXDonnoemoticonXDonno\r\nHow ironic and self-pwning.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Oh. Dammit, at least make it a little more obvious. By the way some of these people think on this forum it sounded pretty realistic to me.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "What's your claim? That the seasonal molt of arctic foxes is evolution or that it is not? As usual, your responses show muddled thinking.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "I'm not aware that the police used violence in arresting any of the people discussed in this case. Besides, I'm not discussing personal morality here, I'm discussing what should be legal, and what is practical in a society where not everyone shares the same moral views. Government is there to apply limits to what is permitted, based on the will of the people.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So you're accusing me of the thing that your most guilty of? As I remember your posts have been censored several times by admin because you resorted to viscious personal attacks and name calling. And aren't you interested in the truth. Why isn't whether J", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "living in kansas myself, i'm surprised i haven't heard more about this. when this came up in missouri a few years ago, it was a huge deal.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Notice that even in this version there are elipses just before the quote in question. My bet is if we were to actually refer to this 44 years old book, Simpson would not be saying what Toxey wants him to say.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "originally posted by easyrider: (to: shooterandproud) did i take you to raise? you're not from around here, are you? what it means is that i'm not obligated to wet nurse / answer all the follies of dedicated christ-bashers.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "wow, i don't understand how this keeps happening. i'll try to switch mice.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "What facts? The article above your post is replete with documented facts. Are you in denial? Have you even read the article? Are all of your responses knee-jerk, shoot-from-the-hip defense mechanisms?Pay attention.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Do you know why gay sex sinners refuse to repent? Because they have an idol - gay sex.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "she is an attractive woman. what was she doing witha 14 yr old? she could probably walk into any local club or bar and pick up the man of her choosing. does she have a specific thing for kids? will she do it again with another kid once this one grows up? if so she is a predetor. of coarse several hundred years ago kids of this age married and fornicated as part of everyday life. is our society that different than is was then? i was a horn dog when i was 14. or at least wanted to be.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "No! At conception we are a person and human.All living things belong to a species and the foetus is a living thing, for that reason a foetus must belong to a species, and that species is human.A fingernail is dead so cannot be considered a living human, nor will it develop into a human.The sperm only has half the chromosomes so is not human.The unique human is the key element here, if you cut your nail, the DNA from the nail can be replicated by the living persons nail, a foetus when destroyed cannot have itself replicated, the unique DNA that is destroyed will never be see on earth again, that individual has gone forever, howver, the man with the nail clipped is still alive.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Being new isn't a problem. Nor is uncertainty about a position. The way to learn is to ask questions in appropriate places. However, a problem with message boards is that, without experience, it may be difficult to tell who is speaking from knowledge and who is speaking from ignorance or faith.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "backpedaling? how's that? my original answer is that it's wrong to force children to have sex with old men. that is my answer still. where has it changed? in fact, each post i've made is an affirmation of the one before it. how is that backpedaling? there are absolute goods and evils. that is, there are certain things that are good or bad. how is that saying something different? certain things are bad. period. just like certain things are wrong, no matter how many people think that they aren't wrong. period. is that clear enough for you? i hope so because that's what i've been saying all along and you'd have to be high to think i've changed my position.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Minnesota Permits single GLBT adoption. Joint gay adoption unclear. Second-parent adoption allowed in some areas.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "The VAST majority of abortions are performed within the first trimester. When they are performed in the second trimester it's a serious procedure for the mother to go through, and is something she obviously wouldn't go into lightly. Her reasons for choosing an abortion as late as that would have to far outweigh anything else, and she would need consent from two doctors to go ahead with it. Basically what I'm trying to say is something like the foetus being developed enough to feel pain would not change the mind of a woman who had just found out she was pregnant and she'd been raped, or was going through something you can't understand. For an abortion that late she'd have to deliver the foetus anyway, which is traumatising enough. ", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "this may have been posted already. i didn't want to read the 3 pages of drivel from rosegone08. makes my head hurt. are there really people like that? by the way, is that a swastika arm band on your avatar? anyway, as always, that brilliant pundit and great american, steven colbert, delivers his insight on this 'gathering storm' issue: there's a storm gathering! i am afraid.... 'remember, when the gay community is granted personal freedoms, ours get taken away. how? shhhhh..... did you see all that lightning?'", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "**\r\nYou are very, very good at pretending that what your apponent says is invisible. Your repetition of the same fatuous inanity, (as always, phrased as evasive rhetorical questions instead of honest declarations of opinion), is nothing but a repetition of the objection I demolished in the very post you are quoting.\r\nAnd here's another flash, socrates. The fact that some organisms die, for any number of reasons, sooner than some of their relatives do, explains exactly nothing. The insinuation that this survival differential has some universal, as opposed to local, efficient cause, is pure fecal matter. And that's all you've got, wiseguy. A simple fact of life, and an insinuated cause, and you think they add up to evolution. Breathtakingly simple-minded assumption, fella.\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "lmao seriously i rarely show emotion, but that's funny. 1. how does that compare to 9/11 exactly? 2. at least that guy was aprehended, where's osama again? oh yeah that's right, we were busy in a random country in the mid-east because some president's daddy was there and jr wanted to show how cool he was. bush should have stuck to bankrupting professional baseball teams and oil companies. and conservatives have no leg left to stand on... literally your pirate avatar is fitting as insulting as you would wish it were. take out your peg leg and try to stand on an issue. current republicans = bought and owned by private interest. those sad soles defending it = easily persuaded and uneducated. i know because i'm an elite liberal. i regularly laugh at how dumb you are.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Ahh Good old (and I mean OLD) Ronnie. This man doesn't know XXXX about foreign policy.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "But behind that are deeper, more fundamental issues about what homosexuality IS and the morality of it. To many people who view homoseuxality as immoral, your movement seems to be trying to write immorality into law.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You are going to need to be very specific here buckwheat:\r\nExactly how did you deduce that I think I am so much better than you?\r\nAnd please, be brief.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "but what about the many cases where that sort of thing doesn't happen? do you really think that every case of someone finding out a person is involved in the homosexual way of life results in being kicked out of a home, church, or job? the problem with your view is that it has no room for people who disagree but don't do these things you say. and that happens all the time.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "You are assuming that the TOE of evolution has remained static since Darwins time.I have to say that is false. We have 150 years of experimental data beyond that. In addition, we not only have the arguement from homology, but we have genetic data to back it up. So sorry, but you struck out.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "yeah that would be fantastic if they came back... and killed tens of millions more people. that would be fantastic!!!! thanks for that... just because ;)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Your denial is not serving you very well, Trebor. Also, try to learn to be something other than a dedicated kibbitzer for a change.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "That is right funny goober Paul Helmke is sweating it as all the post Heller court cases keep chipping away the feet the brady bunch is built on. Gun-ban lobby losing its shot | The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment Gun prohibitionists are disingenuous, hypocritical \"Gun-Free\" Chicago experiences a 9/11 once every four years The Daily O'Collegian - Shooting down gun control laws http://www.news-sentinel.com/apps/pb...6/NEWS/3260308 Another Coburn amendment killed by Senate | .Politics Let me know when you had enough I will post all the States that have a State Firearm freedom act as well as more of the same", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "the liberal propoganda army is on the way? the man must be lonesome!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Oh come on. If those words were hateful, then you need to 'investigate' probably millions of people, because those are pretty normal sentiments. Canada must have a LOT of tax dollars. I don't entirely agree with what he said either, but I think it's downright scary that your govt. investigates something like that.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Speaking from ignorance once again, eh SP? Did you, by chance, ever read the 2000 Census form? Did you happen to see the category \"unmarried partner\"? I didn't think so. Now, go eat some crow. emoticonXHoho \r\nhttp://www.census.gov/population/www...0/samesex.html", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh cc, apparently, 10% of the population has the power to destroy the other 90% somehow. We can't be in the military because we have the power to undermine things, we can't get married cause we will destroy marriage for everyone, we cannot possibly have committed relationships because it would make Britney look bad ( although, I have her beat by 4 years and counting, still happy and going) We have the power. We are gay, ten percent taking out the other 90% or so they say (ask jaaman for more info)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You mean to tell me that you would deny a woman's right to her own body for a zygote, yet you have no problem murdering real human beings? Sounds like a conservative to me...", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Don't you have that other weird warped forum your posting in now?! Go there with your advice.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "When you take that vacation you need, don't go to Rome.\r\n:)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "No. I will never allow \"the people of the country\" to tell me what is best for my my life or my health.To quote Jane Austen in Pride and Prejudice.\"I am only resolved to act in that manner, which will, in my own opinion, constitute my happiness, without reference to you, or to any person so wholly unconnected with me.\"", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "There's more to this story. The doctors who performed the abortion and the girl's mother, were excommunicated from the Catholic Church. And get this: the stepfather who raped his stepdaughter since she was six was NOT excommunicated, because by the Church's logic, what he did was not as bad! But you know, given the way women are dealt with in their holy book, I shouldn't be surprised. http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2009/0...n.html?ref=rss", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Nope. Not part of evolutionary theory. It would be stupid to claim that increased genetic variability would \"disallow\" any portion of the population from breeding.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Just curious, in what ways does God speak back to you, other than the generic \"through the word of God,\" reading the bible thing? Does he literally talk to you?\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Tell us, Steve, now you've been thoroughly snowed (again) by the GOP, how's the weather up there in CloudCuckooLand?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "**\r\nWell, you being a materialist/mexchanist/darwinist and all, I guess we shouldn't have expected you to know the difference between a \"fact\" and a speculative \"just-so story\", but even so, every time you do this it is disappointing.\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Another cheap attempt at diversion on your part? Once again, EZ, I'm not taking your diversionary bait. Instead, I suggest that you give some serious consideration to the nature of your sources. Doing so will save you a lot of humiliation.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Just because a man pays support doesn't mean he is part of the childs life.He has no obligation to do *fatherly* things with his child.Women pay child support BTW.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "matthew dearie you really need to stop whining about your deviant position not being considered the norm or even recognized by the norm. some people in life are just gonna be wrong no matter what and currently you're it.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "What if the surgery for transferring the embryo/fetus would be equal in difficulty, risk, etc. to having an abortion? There would then be no extra physical cost incurred in keeping the embryo/fetus alive. What would be the reasons, in such a case, to keep", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yeah, gassing and murdering 6,000,000 Jews doesn't qualify as suffering very much. \r\nemoticonXRolleyes \r\nI wonder how many slaves were killed by comparison........", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You know they are having a fit,and when everyone see's the streets aren't running red maybe more states will pick it up and follow.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Just another example of using a verse meant for personal use and applying it to wars. Sorry, just doesn't work that way.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Where do you get off saying that kind of tripe to somebody?\r\nThat kind of insane comment is typical of far left loons like you who lie for a living and don't have the common sense of a fence post.\r\nAnd that goes for Jo Bennett too if he's agreeing with you.\r\nCretins.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Actually, I'm not looking for shootouts at all with the criminal element. But what is crazy in my opinion, is admitting that there are holes in the system that allow criminals to get automatic weapons illegally, and you see the solution as banning automatic weapons from being purchased by law abiding citizens rather than screaming for the holes in the system to be fixed so the criminals can't get them. It seems to me that you have an anti-gun agenda and will use any flaw in the system as an excuse to ban all guns for all people. Is that a fair assessment of where you stand?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "That could also be very effective in a positive manner during political campaign speeches.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Simone baby I'll see your Sanford and raise you a Mark Spitzer, John Edwards, Jim McGreevey and of course the king of sleeze der slickmeister Willie.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Hey Matt, if that paintbrush were any broader, you could paint a room in just five minutes", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "The first article is from 2002 and the second one is from 2006, molecular genetics changed massively over that period of time with the completition of the human genome project and the development of new technology. What they would be looking at and comparing would have changed drastically as well, from just the genes in the first case (the 99% figure) and everything in the second (94%).", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "As Kronus explained, there are an infinite number of \"colors,\" because \"color\" is a function of wavelength.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Regardless of the name change, the calendars are still keyed on the birth and death of Christ...and that will be so at least until the atheists are able to come up with another numbering system and force it on everyone else just to pacify their own baby mentalities.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "It depends on your intention and your methods. Of course, things that don't have some sort of physical manifestation that can be measured can't be studied by science. Science is naturalistic. Scientific data can only include that which can be observed and quantified by natural means. I read it in a book of mythology isn't scientific.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So much for choice. Obama's little socialist minions want to use the tax system to collect healthcare premiums if you don't comply. After all, getting employers to collect income taxes before you even see your money has worked for these leeches in the pas", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And you just did what you chastise me for in your next sentence", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "so you are saying that this country is based on principles of judaism? that is a date, dummy. it is not a founding principle. it was how dates were done. and 'our lord' could have been mohamed for all you know, except that it was the standard for dates. no christian principles. so at least you admit that you can't give a single location and that you can't even tell me how many times god, jesus, and religion are mentioned.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "im sorry that you think that.. maybe you should retake the test?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Point taken,however since he likes inflicting said pain on himself what can you do?I think he likes it.emoticonXHoho", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "did someone repeal freedom of beliefs in this country while i wasnt looking. if i told you i talked to satan last night, would you think i needed to be committed? have i made it any secret that i dont believe the supernatural parts of the bible? same reason i quote anyone. does that matter? since you seem to know more about my beliefs than i do, could you explain why you came to this conclusion. thats your privilege. my wife worships me. that doesnt mean im a god. lol what does that mean? obviously. what? you're entitled to your insignificant opinion. :) what?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "i guess this is another one of your mutual admiration club's charmingly racist moments. 'i bet she's black, and ergo, smokes crack.' gee you're all so mother hubbard rhymie. how do you live with yourself? such ignorance; at this point, i'm not even surprised you don't know which montmartre i'm referencing. i don't think i'll tell you, poot.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "You're full of horse manure, O spawn of Satan. And you lie like your father, the devil (John 8:44).", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "so what about jesus' life is credible if the source is unreliable? was it that jesus didnt walk on water but he fed 5000 with 5 loaves? was it that he didnt forgive the samaritan harlot but he raised lazarus from the dead? what did the authors get right? i mean, i can easily believe jesus said he came to bring a sword and not peace. but you dont. so how do we possibly pattern our lives according to how jesus lived if we dont know whether what they recorded was actually what he did?it is necessary to believe that the gospels are true, otherwise you cannot follow a pattrn you dont have.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "A perfect example of why Christian fundamentalismm and evolution can't co-exist. If God is wrong, then the Bible is wrong. Evolution contradicts the Bible, plain and simple.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You are very right. We too will have to pay tax on the insurance for me. Not fair.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "What, specifically, are you witnessing? A baby being born? A prayer apparently being answered? A near miss? Mysterious coincidences that you interpret as being the work of God? Or do you see dead people rising up out of the grave? And people walking on water? And people turning water into wine and feeding a crowd with a small amount of food? What kind of miracles are we talking about here?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Once again you have nothing but hot air.\r\nCan't bust the resurrection; can't bust the rabbis on Isaiah 53, can't falsify the Gospels, etc.\r\nYou are truly pathetic.\r\nYou also need to get a new avatar. \"Smiley\" is definitely something you're not. You're a friggin witch if anything.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "psh if i had to f*&^ hillary i'd cheat too! i mean i'm gay but lord have mercy! lol... but getting back to the subject at hand. simone hun honestly just stop with the cook theories and whoever else even believes them. bush and dick had no idea of 9/11 we all didn't. i find it a sad irony that we discover the warning signs after the incident... we're only human and we all make mistakes... oh and fyi we did not land on the moon.. simone told me it was made of cheese and that there were giant moon rats eating and eating until one day the moon will be gone... that's why there are holes in it. it's true!!! honestly!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Some Hispanics are totally white. Some Hispanics are very black. Many Hispanics are brown. As a matter of fact, there are a number of Hispanics now who are very Asian.\r\nThose damned Hispanics just don't seem to want to play by the rules!\r\nIn fact, there are some Hispanics who look very Scandinavian. Just to show you!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "that is not much of an excuse to ignore 13 pages of archives from cbs is it? cbs news investigates - cbs news there are reports from every major newspaper that reported on the scandal...which all did, some more than others. poor excuse wanna try again? emoticonxgood something tells me you don't want brightbart and fox news, nor the l.a. times nor any source to report the truth, is that about it star gazer?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Evidently, when I include qualifiers you ignore those anyway...\r\nI never claimed you \"said they were the only hurdle\".\r\nBut it was the only hurdle you mentioned in your earlier posts.\r\nI quoted two posts of yours.\r\nCare to show where you mentioned \"congress\" in those posts????\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "EZ, if the concept of Gay Jesus offends you, why do you bring up the subject incessantly? You're the only one who does this around here. Truly bizarre.For example...", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "So Pat is an example of gonadal dysgenesis (or an intersexual.) Are you sure it is correct to describe this condition as being \"made-up of two genetically distinct people\"? Is is not the case that Pat is one genetically distinct person made up of two complete chromosome sets?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "why would you think such an absurd concept. corporations don't cast a vote in an election do they? why not? does a corporation have a mind of it's own that it may look to it's interests in it's attempts to influence legislation? no, it permits individuals to overcome finance laws and exercise greater influence than is normally permitted for an individual. should your car have rights? you pay a tax for it. how about your house? pay a tax for that also every year.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Horse manure. When did you invent that self-serving rule? Put it back in your ditty-bag.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So, a human-mother is equal to the abilities/wisdom of God now? - \r\n Interesting thing:\r\n How many mothers do *you* know, \r\n who can successfully *champion* a person (hiding in coma-states of mind)?\r\n \r\n Annie", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "But you don't like intellectual property and consign it to non-existence.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I still haven't seen an adequate rebuttal to this. Why can't people marry themselves if they are in love with themselves? I must have missed your response.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "it looks like you have tried to analize everything i say as being 'my' life experiences. i really enjoy your abuse , i would love to meet up with you some day. my life is fantastic actually. i dont know why i have to keep repeating that. what about those in haiti right now ? what about others? i think they are more important than your fucking sulking over the americans lousy pronunciations.or me whining over you being an arsehole. as for amy winehouse , no reputable establishment would dare touch the skank.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "are you talking about the love of god or the love of the politically-correct? as the bible says, 'love does not rejoice in iniquity,' and, 'love does a neighbor no harm' (like enticing one's neighbor into a sinful, carnal relationship). trying to bring people to god's way of loving is a most unappreciated endeavor. so pedophilia and wife beating are okay with you? neither of those are in the ten commandments either. do you really think god approves of those? but god is on record about gay sex. you might want to read leviticus 18:22, leviticus 20:13, romans 1:26-27 and jude 7 to become acquainted with god's admonitions against gay sex.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "So the Establishment Clause was included to promote atheism, eh?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I know that sometimes when a woman is on the pill, and they happen to get pregnant anyways, it will cause you to miscarry (not always, but sometimes). Usually it happens very early in the pregnancy before they realize they are even pregnant. But I don't know if I would call that abortion as in the way the term is normally used, because the woman isn't terminating the pregnancy on purpose, although miscarriage is called 'spontanious abortion'.. I also remember hearing from a friend of mine, who is Catholic, that in her church any type of birth control is considered wrong.. I'm not sure on that though, since I'm not Catholic myself.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Name them. Real contemporary people who testified about a real superman. And don't forget to identify the time period and where they lived and their written historical accounts.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "avoiding what question, penfold? emoticonxbanghead how is asking iangb to take it to the 'challenger's corner' an avoidance? i see it as a chance to amplify the discussion. at any rate, it's a lot easier to answer a question if you know what is being asked. so,... feel free to repeat the question that you are accusing me of trying to avoid.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh yeah those, i knew this girl once who put those up in her. freaky stuff man", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh yes...i masquerade as an atheist and a 6-day creationist at the same time to try to appeal to a wider audience.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Rather than address my points in the slightest manner, your response consists entirely of this. (Think I'm surprised?) And you somehow think that I'm the one being defeated? But then, with your \"understanding\" of logic, nobody's surprised.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Welcome to the world of fundamentalism ! You mean you still don't know -they have no use for logic, common sense , hence they use all these absurd comparisons. The debate is going to go around in circles.\r\nBut be careful what you say about enough time to make a decision, or you might prove Bell right.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "It bounces off me like bullets off Superman emoticonXClownSeriously, this is your rejoiner? To make fun of my title? lol, how that stings... I think I have to go get a tissue before I reply ;)If you care to try and back up your statements, then we might have a debate.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "When it comes to all the examples that Behe had provided in both his first book, and his second book , it has been shown to be able to evolve naturally. That means, in principle, IC systems can evolve. If you don't believe so, bring forth the I.C. system of your choice. To say 'But you don't know all the answers' is just the logical fallacy known as 'argument from ignorance'. Behe brings a system up that he claims is IC.. the pathway for evolution is discovered, and Behe trys another one. How dishonest can you get? The concept is falsified.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "He is concerned that you are taking things to far, Simone.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "But what you are being challenged to do is to give some evidence for the idea that the world was created less than 10,000 years ago. In other words, \"If Genesis-style creation were true, we would expect to see (fill in the blank).\"", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Besides the hundreds of cases in which such things are directly observed, I guess you're right.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "In my lifetime, we've made huge strides, but there's a lot more to learn.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "He did finally figure out how to use the quote function, so there is SOME progress!!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I'm glad that you're the one living in fear of becoming a criminal for defending your family and not me.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You are a known anti-gun supporter, should we really be surprised at your presidential choice. Funny thing is, you are going to get screwed just like the rest of us if Obama wins. He might try to take our guns away, but your rights that are important to you wont be very far behind.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "No more or less than Jebus when he did the same....emoticonXChickenemoticonXChicken", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "We don't take him seriously anymore because despite having been refuted over and over (both here and on at least four other boards), he still posts the same garbage. Whenever it looks like there has been overwhelming refutation of his thread, he abandons it and starts a new one saying basically the same thing as the one before it. THAT is why he isn't taken seriously, and no, it is not \"unfair\". I also have to ask why you think he puts so much intelligence into his posts, when all he does is either cut and paste from some anti-evolution site, or say things like \"science is a joke\" My pet dog could do better.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Really? Intra-species evolution and inter-species evolution are one and the same? *edit* I was reading on micro-evolution in wikipedia, here is what they had to say...is this incorrect? \"Typically, observable instances of evolution are examples of microevolution; for example, bacterial strains that have become resistant to antibiotics. Because microevolution can be observed directly, both pro-evolution and some anti-evolution groups agree that it is a fact of life.\"", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You know, I've seen this BS from you quite often. Is your life sour? Do you need to make other peoples lives as miserable as you can just so you can get through the day?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yes. Oddly, the picture makes as much sense as most creationists. :)", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "The goal of anti-abortionist is clear. The job of self restraint is that of each participant in their close encounters.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Why not quote the Second verbatum and parse it? Of course you'll need to clarify that the commonly used rules regarding the English language and valid logic must apply. Otherwise, you'll get the liberal twist of subjective \"logic\" and interpretation of the author's intent.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Thats an odd analogy. Can a child survive without its mother? I'd say a baby is no less dependent on its mother the first few years than it is when in it grew in the womb.\r\n \r\n Is the child still a parasite then?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "the law abiding responsible gun owner who gunned them down did so respectfully, right ? emoticonXFrazzledYou gun crazies are the only ones with a sick political agenda, you ought to be all sent to a loony bin and given water pistols.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "There is no evidence in your eyes. There is tremendous evidence that the universe and everything in it was designed , even Darwin admitted that was the impression the evidence gave. Of course as an atheist he had to believe differently regardless of how absurd the story was.If particles to people was presented as a senario instead of science we would have no argument.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "There's nothing to help, because what you said has no resemblance to reality.If someone is a junkie, they might also smoke pot, or if someone is a crackhead, they might also smoke pot, but the large majority of pot smokers DO NOT do heroin or smoke crack.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I say that you need to take into consideration the number of criminals that'll disregard the lock and try and break down the door anyway. That's why smart people don't rely exclusively on locks and security systems for their own protection.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Getting nervous?\r\nBTW, I think Anthony Flew is wrong about the Christian God.\r\nJesus Christ is the very Son of God and God!\r\nI hardly see a \"despotic\" bone in Jesus. Oh, I see, whipping the money changers, I guess some just have no back bone, and can't picture honest for real, righteous indignation!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "because that's the subject of this thread: what designing a solution to a problem actually entails.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Proof for a non-event? What century did your purported non-event supposedly occur, Einstein?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "No, actually I didn't. Actaully, I'm afraid that you are showing that you can't read English!\r\nTry reading them again.\r\nHere, I'll give a clue, since you are so clueless. Note that JPSartre12 says ALL religions, whereas the word all does not appear in my statements. See, that makes a BIG difference.\r\nThus, I am right. You are wrong. JPSartre12 is wrong.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You are just playing dumb, right? There will be fewer technicians and fewer orders for equipment PER INSURED. Their pay will not be cut. There will be fewer of them PER INSURED. Initially the absolute volume will increase.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "What does a mutation have to do with a heart transplant? What are you smoking?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "no, darling....i'm a religiously 'lax', but 'spiritually active' episcopalian. but, what if i was a believer in the nation of islam? would that justify your bigotry and racism? i think not. check the 1st amendment, which you conveniently omit.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "You're right it'll be fighting the war in Iraq. )Nah, really it'll be from social security, etc etc.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Nobody should be forced to even have a sonagram. I think that you'll find reasonable pro-life and pro-abortion people believe that much.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I'm going to assume you misunderstood my post because I don't think you are an idiot...so giving you the benefit of the doubt let me retrace the series of events.\r\nMatthew S. Stated that when people say \"We believe marriage is between a man and a woman.\" think that gays are not citizens. I then returned a question saying \"if someone if 6 and can't marry are they going to 'not be citizens' as well?\". The logic behind that question is not to say that gays are 6 year olds but rather that gays are citizens just like a 6 yr old even if both can't marry. In other words, marriage doesn't make you a citizen or not...unless you think 6yr olds are citizens as well. Trying to make it seem like I made a statement out of a question is foolish and should be avoided.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "no? i've looked up your name, and once separated from the historical galileo figure, yours seems to be exclusively on boards talking about gun control, and you always seem to be using the actions of criminals as grounds for calling for evermore gun control.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "And you remind me of the people in the year 1900 who said man would never be able to build a flying machine.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh please, you have got to be joking. where are you pulling this from? a 'severe retraction of the money supply' causes inflation? it isn't a 'historically founded assumption' or a 'mathematical' certainty, and to deny it is virtually to deny all economics. supply and demand determine price. i care, because the purchasing power of that money correspondingly declines. if you think the government printing currency and spending it does not cause the value of all other currency in circulation to decline, the same must apply to private citizens. why don't we just issue a printing press to every american, then they can all have as much money as they want. you are twisting yourself in a knot trying to justify this lunacy you originally wrote: then [", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "interestingly, single-celled organisms and \"simple organisms\" (those with less functionality) look more alike than they do to mammals and other more \"complex\" organisms...", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "judeau, my christian science darling! where have you been? my faith rests upon you!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "The poor in the US certainly seem to eat more than the rich in most countries.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Everyone expects that. What they don't and shouldn't have to expect is that they will be specifically targeted and have to pay more, be penalised more, etc. than hetero couples such as yourself or me and my husband.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "dear marga, alam naman talaga natin mali ka, kaya i accept mo na tama ang communism :) labyu.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Actually, the fact that children of gay parents are no more likely to be gay than children of straight parents directly refutes the original article.Children of gay parents have only one gender, which the original article pointed to as a cause for homosexuality.If NARTH's article pretends to talk about the impact of a missing gender, then Charliegone's article directly refutes.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "If jesus said 'Make correct Judgments\", IMO you have failed miserably.\r\nHe is also alledged to ahve said 'He who is without sin cast the first stone.\r\nI guess that with all the stones you are casting, you consider yourself without sin.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Poor little poopie. \r\nIf your gay sex agenda wasn't of the devil himself you might be better received in the world.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "No, actually they used the Bible as a basis for their morality. They then applied that morality to the design of a system of government that they wanted to create. Maybe the majority of Americans are comfortable with the status quo WRT their morals. Who are you to tell them that they have to change for you?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "our sense data cannot tell us in an absolute sense that there is a real object, just that there appears to be a real object. all of the experiences of all humanity make it appear as if what we experience is real. does that mean that it is absolutely real? possibly not, but i would think that that possibility is small since none of our mutual experiences hint at those sensory inputs not being real.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "I was about to take a sip of coffee when I read that! Would have lost the keyboard and monitor!!!", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well, since a working definition of \"insanity\" would be denying observable reality, I would say that your argument is insanity. \r\nOn a side note, how have you not been banned yet? Any particular reason admin?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "that's probably being saved for the next round of national election fodder. maybe something on the order of occupying all the me, making it a christian democracy while we use their oil for their own good? with every family owning their own home, two cars and a boat. wait, they've used that promise and it failed. not to worry, i'm sure they'll come up with something that'll keep the sheep headed towards the cliff.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "That and VOR keeps flip flopping on his positions and he refuses to clarify his contridictions.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And if there are two competing hypotheses that are actually hard to choose between? As they get closer, it becomes less possible to choose by instinct or testing. A principle comes in handy.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Hey, I'm from Joisey. Youz guys better watch what you say about us or you'll be sleeping with the fishes. emoticonXKill", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "There ya go again kronus. You can't refute my argument so you resort to insulting me. emoticonXFrazzled Thanks for being so consistent. emoticonXGood", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "are you so incompetent you can't look up dominionism and reconstructionism on the net? hell, if i posted the links, you wouldn't read them anyway. emoticonxbanghead", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "a bit over the top here eh? quicksand?...butcher babies? wow...very sensational... i have a question for ya ez? do you own any slaves? do you have a beard or long hair? have you stoned any non-virgin brides lately. seeing as though you are so adherant to the bible....i figure you at best have smited a neighbor or two this week?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Exactly, which brings us back to square 1. Creationism is based on religion, and Evolution is based on the Scientific method, but is not proven. Creationism isnt even near being proven. So, why would you try to impose your religious beliefs on public school children?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And the scientific papers don't. The problem here is that creationists don't read the scientific papers. In fact, most can't even understand them.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "wow, if you honestly believe that then you have been brainwashed by fear mongering and propaganda and you dont think for yourself, how does religion not do that? anyone who uses religion as an excuse for violence is extremely misled and should rethink their views, that doesnt mean religion itself is bad.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "I have no idea what \"women's rights\" might be either. You could try to explain that to me while you are at it.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I have an avatar? And I wasn't born in 1990. Remember what the say about assumptions...", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "If that's the case I wish someone would unplug me. I'm getting tired of this version of reality.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Actually, the dating is done on layers above and below the rock in which fossils are found. You see, generally fossils are found in some sort of sedimentary rock. And sedimentary rock cannot be dated. But a layer of volcanic ash above and below the fossil can be dated and thus give a date within a range.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "so you are attracted to members of the opposite sex due to intelligence? nothing to do with hormones or desires? wow. hormones don't attract you to other people in your gender, and you don't always fall for your desires do you because some of them can ruin your life as you know it. and you know this because their opinion doesn't match yours? from your 'anything goes' point of views you aren't very moral. yes they can learn to deny who they are ad ridicule people like themselves and wonder their whole lives if they will go to hell for feeling like they do. quite frankly that reply made no sense.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "does the enormous pay of ceos help the economy? probably not. would prohibiting enormous pay of ceos (threatening to fine or imprison people if they violated an arbitrary cap on salaries) help the economy? certainly not. is rawls argument correct, and all that remains is for us to work out the details of a totalitarian state to enforce his ideals? no.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Speak of the Devil! And, speaking of hate speech and insults, OS is the ultimate master.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You can thank Slick Willie Clinton who pushed through the sub-prime lending fiasco that eventually blew up under Bush. And gay-boy Barney Franks who oversaw the program.\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Then you freely admit that you lied when you said this, and I quote: People like Arch are setting it as opposed to science and in that position it will be doomed to fail. AND Arch is doing nothing but distorting the very thing he holds so dear, I mean, how is accurately quoting passages from the bible distorting it in any way? You do nothing but post drivel which makes no factual statements at all. And you call that debating?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "It's not tough, especially for close stars.\r\n http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/CosmosNotes/distance.htm\r\n \r\n You use triangulation based on the orbit of the earth.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And who is the 'WE' that we trust? The scientists or the theologians, who disagree with each other? \r\n \r\n I am curious for it on my own account.. and not willing just to accept someone's authority saying it happened one way or another.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Heck Doc what job is that?little job?.And he is very informed because Comrade P see's to it.emoticonXGood", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "That's ridiculous. The purpose imposed by man is what makes it artificial in the first place. You have the idea expressed in the definition backwards. It isn't that natural selection operates on the same principles as artificial selection, but the reverse. The principles are that differential reproductive success will have an effect on the gene pool of the species.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Indeed. And that fact makes the old creationist plum about how evolutionary theory is dogmatic or that evolutionary biologists aren't allowed to disagree with \"standard\" theory a laugh. Clearly, evolutionary biologists disagree and those disagreements are published openly. Science makes progress by questioning and disagreement.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "no, you just live on delusions. you can't argue the merits of creationism on their own because they don't exist. Creationism is a fraud regardless of the existance of evolution.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And my favourite! Contraception doesn't work kids! It's all a lie!\r\n \r\n http://www.abortionfacts.com/online_books/love_them_both/why_cant_we_love_them_both_35.asp#How%20effective%20are%20contraceptives%20in%20preventing%20pregnancy?\r\n \r\n -Wez", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "i guess you missed the smiley. here it is again ;)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "I don't think VoR realizes that we see him gay-bash without a second thought that we recognize his socalled \"coy\" tricks. \"You can fool some of the people some of the time, but............\"", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Clearly you don't give a damn, because if you did then you would have to admit that you were wrong. Does this mean that you think the introduction of speed limits is a bad idea? ", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yes, do you? It's in a country with no medical facilities, no sterile place to get it done. A country full of HIV and AIDS. I wouldn't be surprised if these mothers had HIV/AIDS and knew they'd leave their child an orphan.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "If the woman wants one than yes to all three.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "The one that was investigating whether or not there were 'fast evolving' gamete cells. There were 4 general things they were going to study 1) fast evolving gamete cells, 2) accumulation of genes 3) forgot and 4) forgot. How did the article turn out?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "yes, how silly of me to debate him on 'points'. i should debate him on .... what? and here you are again criticising one side, and not the other. he was insulting; you remained stony silent. because he denies that darwin ever used it. darwin did. small point but he entered into all sorts of highly spurious rationales rather than accepting this point (again you were stony silent on this) what is evolution? what is evidence? well that would be a first time. but why ask now, after several days, after he's gone by the wayside, after he made the claim again and again and again? you made no statement while he was claiming this false claim? why your sudden interest in digging all posts i've responded too?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "i love how bitm can start all these new threads that ironically, say the same thing over and over, yet somehow when pressed to backup his own policy positions he continually flees the threads. we're still waiting on you bitm...", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "While I'm still iffy on her with the whole New Haven case, and her off-the-bench comments on race, this is one thing I commend her for and agree completely with.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "If the justification for morality is obedience to a divine authority, it has no place in a public school. Those without religious beliefs are not by definition immoral.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So that pesky kid who climbs your fence to get his ball back is fair game. Riiight.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Do you need faith to know the sun will rise tomorrow or that 2 + 2 = 4 or to know that if you drop a rock it will fall to the ground?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "In your first post. If you are to qualify that by stating I assert that reproduction is not an absolute requirement of life over the ontogeny of an individual then of course reproduction is not essential character of life.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I support gay people in all their efforts but I'm not gay myself so you will have to look elsewhere for a date.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh really mic? care to explain http://www.createdebate.com/user/points/preschaffy http://www.createdebate.com/user/points/chaffy http://www.createdebate.com/user/points/ mrshellno all 3 accounts that are said to be yours down-voting arguments on your debate out of the blue for no reason great way to irrefutably prove they are your accounts.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Ahh...I perceive that Cauchy3 or one of his descendents has made it to this site.\r\nFriends, we are in for some surreal poetry!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "how about suicide? so he wouldn't have to end his life in prison. there was an autopsy. results not public yet.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "i love it when people manipulate statistics in order to attempt to prove a causal relationship that doesn't exist. considering the fact that more women vote than men, one could argue that their views are over-represented. ", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Possibly, I must admit I never tried to gain access to swords whilst over there.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "My mistake; I read it wrong. And guess what? I do know what the moon is ;)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well, I'm sincere in how I interpreted what he wrote, and I honestly believe that is what he meant.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Oh I hated being pregnant. However I am not really arguing whether pregnancy in and of itself is punishment, I suspect that is an opinion matter - there are some crazy women who actually liked pregnancy. ;) Julie - however clearly feels that it is acceptable to use a pregnancy and parenting in a punitive matter against women she feels are irresponsible.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "imagine that! missiles machine guns and grenades. i cannot buy missiles, machine guns are strictly regulated, and grenades? does a class 3 license cover grenades? if it does, all the mexican government has to do is supply the u.s. with the serial number and bam! the criminal is busted! however, wayne lapierre from the nra, and chris cox said in congressional testimony said that the mexican government will not give the u.s. serial numbers. cnn parrots mexican claims that u.s. guns fuel drug wars ", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Another personal favorite of mine... When I showed up to a seminar hosted by a local creationist, I challenged him to produce a textbook with false evidence. He couldn't. When I brought every last biology and biochemistry textbook from my college career to him for him to scour, he didn't even bother to look.Translation: this claim is XXXX, and Wells knows it.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Insects are not birds. Get your terminology correct. Also please stop lying. It makes baby jesus cry. \r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well bravo for you - they must not be all that good considering. Or did you simply learn to be deceptive yourself and confuse that with deception by others? Who can say?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Oh, really? Translation: the only amendments that rise and fall are the ones that I want to.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "intangible i'm surprised at you from what i've seen your very fair in your debating style, and i understand you don't want to see more suffering, but do you not think there might be a better way ?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Is this a rational statement? If so, prove it rationally, by science.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I see no mention below of any judges in Mass.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Really? Is it of the flesh eating variety that is resistant to all but the strongest antibiotics? Because if so, then that is big news.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "hun dont let no ones opinions bother you. no one matters but you, because your living your life and its your body. i personally think everyone shold hold off till 16 but im not going to insult you because thats just plain retarded. what gives you people the right to insult someone for asking a question? im not talking about freedom of speech im talking about being a nice person. nobody has manners anymore, i swear.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Did you notice how what I was responding to was said? I didn't think so. Your tunnel vision is showing again. \r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "If Obama had his way, standing against the government would be the most patriotic thing someone could do.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "is it that this has already been discussed a lot elsewhere? if that's the case, let me know. otherwise, i'm very surprised people aren't talking about this. simone? anyone?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Via something called \"evidence\". It is something that a creationist will never have come across, thus explaining why you are unaware of it.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "yes let's all cheer on the glorified shameless point-farming bitch of this site.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "would you rather have them be born with down's or not? it all depends on what comes out of the mothers, well, you know. whether it has down's or not is the question. i believe that abortion a couple of cells is not killing anyone, that that a new mental existence would be born in its place. therefore if a defective cell or two was aborted, and the parents decided to have a new baby and carry it to term, in my eyes they are the same baby, since one didn't have a mental existence.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Guns in our society increased. \r\n Total NICS Firearm Background Checks -- November 30, 1998 - February 28, 2010", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well actually I have not seen your point of view expressed anywhere but on these forums. Seems to me if its rising to ascendancy at least ONE scientist somewhere would have recently at least mentioned it. Quick search reveals NO mentions at all. Of course if you say its displacing NDS then I guess I will have to agree - you being a well known biologist and all, but I remain perhaps a bit irrationaly skeptical.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "If I were to become upset merely because you told me the ideas were wrong, you might have a point. But I don't; never have, so far as I recall. An idea can't be stupid, or simple-minded. An idea can be right or wrong, or perhaps partly both. When you describe an idea as stupid, you are saying it is wrong and one would have to be stupid to think that. When you describe an idea as simple minded you are saying it is wrong and one would have to be simple-minded to think that.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You say you cannot see it from the gay perspective, then you speak from that perspective as a gay man. This is confusing. As a heterosexual, if you are one, would you give up those rights and let gays have the rights?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "This does not mean that the column is fantastic nor imaginative. It may very well be that not all areas of the earth accumulated all types of rock that form the column; this does not mean that the years at which similar columns were deposited in different places in the world are not similar. And of course, even if the Geologic column is not true, this provides no evidence of creationism.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I'll give you that one...only because I think by then women will be able to place their fertilized ovums in banks. But then again they said the same thing about robot servants and flying cars too!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You accuse others of making an assumption to the answer.\r\n But then you admit that YOU think the answer should have been assumed.\r\n \r\n Do you see a problem here?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You just don't get it. Americans are freemen. Your faith in governments over people is humorous... How does it fell to lick the bootheels of your government overlords..... Rights are inalienable to man. One man has NO right to intefere with another man. I should be able to do as I please as long as I do not intefere with others... How does your government feel about that?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well that's fine because I don't really listen to lunatics insult me too much either...\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Aw declare victory and slither off eh. I made an assertof fact that was backed up. You made a strawman of abandonment. No one made that claim but you. They come here because they don't get the proceedure in a timely manner. Get it now? Hence you lose as usual.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "leroyjames, i am just shocked at your blatantly sarcastic response to kelly ;)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "there is no link that i know of..............do you know what cspan is? its a television network here in the u.s...........it shows demonstrations and protests among other things............. what other flags are you talking about? emoticonxconfused i don't know about where you live but in this country we have only one national flag....... maybe where you live you want to protect toilet paper.if you do go for it.......... emoticonxrolleyes you have a lot to learn in life young man.....hopefully with age will come wisdom.........", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "But the belief that 'its gotten us far' is itself a 'scientific' type belief, in fact it has less proof on the empirical assumptions than the science itself. Justifying the validity of experience by experience is the intellectual equivalent of saying'God must exist, because God is good and would not allow a world without God'.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So, if having children isn't a requirement fro marriage, then gays should be OK, right? If it is what it is all about, if you marry a woman who is incapable of having children, even with scientific methods, then you are not really married? What about lesbians? They can have childre, with a little help from the local sperm bank. In facst, they can BOTH get pregnant. Does tht mean that a marriage between 2 lesbians is twice as valid? What if a couple of gay men adopt? Then is their marriage valid? If I have a vasectomy, am I divorced? You are confusing me. Please explain.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh yeah same here. i sadly have no more tolerance for prodigee anymore. i highly dislike him. hopefully this doesnt sounds harsh.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Do you even read what anyone posts? Try it, you might learn something.......maybe not.......", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "HEY - you took that cross out of context. Or did you have Dracula there, too?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "heh. i'm amused that we both put 'massage' in quotes.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "The other forest does not photosynthesize all year round, the other forest is also in just as much danger as the rainforest. For some reason, radical environmentalists choose to place undue emphasis on the de-forestation of rainforest rather than global forest as a whole.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You are, in effect, telling me that putting someone in a position that will inevitable leave them dead does not make you responsible for their death. If I fire a bullet at your head, while that bullet is in mid-air, I am no longer doing anything to hurt you, and you are fine. However, I have set in motion affects that will result in your demise. This makes me responsible for your death.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And Anarchy. Am I allowed to kill someone if I feel like it ?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Because all scientists hate god. Again, this is a fact.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Old habits die hard and dogs don't pay attention to clocks!", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And there you have the \"***** Eye for the Straight Guy\" review of the inauguration. :p \r\nNever mind the expense, the protests, the rather scary IMHO precendent Bush has set in terms of the inauguration, let alone his foreign policy, let's talk about Laura Bush's outfit. emoticonXRolleyes \r\nWaxy", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I guess it's a good thing I wasn't replying and/or talking to you then. But thanks for your input, it has been noted.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "what do you not understand about a republican 527 running a communist for kerry campagin? right....well, we know that iran expliciately endores bush....and lilkely the kkk as well. so... ball is in your court.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "see, it's fun. finally, some one came to this thread and posted something. i had in mind the song 'hard on me' by asia but oh well. someone finally posted on here besides me and the 'more reference' question from master_shake. now, can someone take my post here and do the exact same thing? i'll use a lot of words so you have stuff to take out and mess with and play around with all you want. so now there is only one question that i have...who's next?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh yeah... that... well... but what a sweet way to go, right ;)", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "They do it on purpose, alright. But not because it'll be shot down -- in at least one state, the Supreme Court decided that similar legislation did not address more than one issue.The reason they put them together is that, in most states, a ban on civil unions would FAIL.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh yes. the holocaust never happened and the nazis were innocent aryan wonder-men. =d :)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Sweetie, if you imagine most people are capable of home schooling kids, why doesn't everyone do it?\r\nThis isn't about government power, it's about what's best for the education of kids. Some kids will do fine with home schooling. Most will not, because their parents aren't the best of teachers. Apparently, you can't figure that out.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "It still doesn't make sense to say that 6000 years ago was when it happened. If you believe in the biblical god then presumably you believe in prophecy, which mandates that god created the whole of time and space as one. It's a non-sequitur to say it happened 6000 years ago; that would be like you asking me 'when was that wall built?' and me replying 'Halfway along'.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Oh, right. And what would yours be? \"We the humble people of the human species have decided to break away from Britan rule and form our own bubble community. No one has any rights whatsoever, and we restrict our citizens to living in bubbles because we cherish each life, from skin cells to bacteria to plants to embryos. In fact, we really have no purpose in life, we just life to not kill other lives.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Sure I agree with it. The thing is, you used to argue (not in these exact words of course) that decency on the part of the hospital wasn't required, all that gays needed to do was visit a lawyer and they'd be all set. I am asking you to clarify that position now to see if you still hold that opinion or if you've changed it, specificially in light of this event. Simple question, no gotcha waiting to pounce. :)", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "But wouldn't the biochemical similarities speak for themselves? That is, does one have to believe that the two specimens (which share biochemical similarities) evolved in order to infer that they will respond similarly to antibiotics? The observable facts of the similarities would seem sufficient (and more scientific?).", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "i just love how you back down. am i expected to waste my time on this? no. so why the fuck are you?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Oh look, Gansao the blowhard is still living in his world of ignorance and denial... like his daddy Ezridden. \r\nYou couldn't educate a rock ya stupid bastard.emoticonXBye", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "i love how this guy screwed up the alignment on this page... but the basis of the argument is that evil is the lack of god, which makes it literally impossible for god to commit evil. but this raises the problem that god is then not capable of all things. he couldn't sin even if he wanted to. he is not all powerful. since he is not capable of doing something that even a weak human could do.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "No kidding. What could POSSIBLY be more concrete? As far as I can tell, she has never publicly made a statement specifically about the DC gun ban but since, as you pointed out, she DID say that no functioning democracy should allow private ownership of guns, I have trouble believing that she thinks the private citizens of DC should be allowed to own guns, UNLESS what she is saying is that since we own guns, we should move toward a monarchy or perhapse some kind of dictatorship. She did not, as far as I know, voice her opinion regarding private gun ownership in a totalitarian system.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Even then, your statement does nothing. They aren't \"getting themselves pregnant\". A doctor is doing a medical procedure, that may or may not result in a pregnancy (ya know, those little sperm thingies?) emoticonXAngel", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I think if that happened, Texas probably will go back to being the lone star state.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yer lucky you ain't as old as me. They would have loved you with the M-1!", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "They do provide many more services than providing abortions :P", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "wow, what a cool suggestion! yes, this has happened to me before. thank you for the idea! would the individual clarify in the debate itself or in a separate argument/posting?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yet that is an argument used by most LIB DIM GGs. Now there may be some consternation as to my use of that term, but gun control is for most purposes, the baliwick of those same minions. It will always be easy for the crimiinals to acquire those weapons. Nine million anti-gun laws will not change that.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "To be honest...I don't know. But I do know that to argue something is false because the consequences are not desired is a logical fallacy (Appeal to Consequences).So is the argument I posted earlier (posted below for quick reference) true or false? And if false, why?A) Only science should be taught in science class (this is why creationism should not be taught in science class).B) Science is a collection of testable theories which have been thoroughly observed, identified, described, experimentally investigated and remain unrefuted.Conclusion: If A is true and B is valid then science class should only consist of testable theories which have been thoroughly observed, identified, described, experimentally investigated and remain unrefuted.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "This argument is self-defeating. A theory is not a fact, no matter how much evidence may support the theory. Bad wording. But again, if you claim something as a fact, you must have proof, verified in both your method of reasoning, and the reasoning utilized by the person you are proving the fact to.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Kronus said this was a win for science. He never mentioned that religion was discredited- never mentioned religion at all. Religion and science are utterly unrelated. Why would you make that connection?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "As I mentioned above, science curriculums follow paths. One's worldview plays heavily on one's interpretation of scientific data. An agnostic, or atheist teaching establishment can become satisfied with one path of scientific theories without searching for others. There may be more to be discovered about thermodynamics, cell structure, irreducible complexity, the decay rate of the earth's magnetic field, radiometric dating, the fossil record, and countless other things that a teaching establishment may not be interested in exploring, if it's comfortable with it's interpretation of current data's indications that the happenstance origins worldview is correct. It goes back to what we touched on before - teaching students HOW to think, not WHAT to think.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Not many women would say they had an abortion now, let alone back when it was illegal.It is an emotionally trying event. I can understand why she wouldn't for that reason alone. Another possibility is that the Administration is buying her silence, or it could be a combination of the two.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And you're mentally disturbed. \r\nDidn't I say that there is no such thing as a \"ex-gay\"??? Did I stutter?\r\nYou can pretend that denial is a river over in Egypt. Somebody thinking that they can successfully \"supress\" their true orientation, and deny themselves homosexual contact, is delusional..because the truth will always come out..because that's what the truth does. \r\nShow me an ex-gay, and I'll show you a liar. Where are they, that I can query them? I'll wait.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Functioning? The fetus breathes freely? It cries when it is hungry or uncomfortable? It demands attention? It smiles and coos and is cute to those who behold it?\r\nWow! Didn't know that fetuses were that active and functional.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "wow, in your very warped world view, people with moral values that defend the most defenseless among us and speak for those who can't speak for themselves are seen as morally perverted by you? how terribly pathetic of you capo. but sadly, i'm not the least bit surprised at how incredibly shallow your perspective is. what boggles the mind though is that you're unable to empathize with a whole class of human beings whom you once were yourself. just think about it capo, can you see what that say's about you?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "You want a society that oppresses people. If the law effects even one person adversly then it is unjust and needs to be overturned. IT only goes to prove that conservatives are heartless and want people to suffer.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Oh come on, marc, you can't possibly expect me to swallow that one. Religion, which locked up astronomers? What atheist social policy was geocentrism getting in the way of, hmm? What makes that farce science's fault?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "On the other hand abortion is only opposed by the born and wars are started only bu the born and choices are made etc etc etc etc.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Wow, what a group of rude, self important, pompous, pseudo intellectuals who will insult and personally attack a person for one grammatical error. I meant to say the UNIVERSE has aged from 4 to 14 billion years old since I was in school but rather than deduce that you call me dumb and ignorant ? With all of your so called intelligence can you prove the Universe is now precisely 14 billion years old ? Can you prove Neanderthal Man was a human descendant ? because DNA tests dont prove that out and yet PHDs and Masters Degreed scientists insist they are. That's why the bible say's that the wisdom of this World is foolishness to God.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Thats because there are far more heterosexuals.\r\nI cannot take a racist heterophobic serious when he tries to tell me that using certain words mean that a heterosexual man is an abuser or misogynist.\r\nAs said, your expertise are firmly on the other side.\r\nAs for your nonsense about Univ Houston.\r\nI simply do not believe it.\r\nYou have the manner of a school teacher and the wit of railway clerk.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And that didn't have a thing to do with my point.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "No argument there. I wasn't asked if I wanted my federal tax dollars to go towards same sex benefits in violation of DOMA. :xcensored", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "When the \"right to privacy\" is interpreted by the courts so widely & loosely as to include the denial of the rights and personhood of prebirth children,.... (sans Roe v. wade) What can I say? The \"People\" are going to react in ways to counter the courts controversial ruling. Same as it ever was.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "\"Ready to go\", in the sense that living things are equipped with a means of making small errors which are used by natural selection to make new structures.Barbarian, regarding mutations:There is a lot of that. Many mutations are recessive and a population over time accumulates a lot of genetic variation that can become useful if the environment changes. The founder population of lizards, for example, could have had at most, 20 alleles for any gene locus, since each lizard can only have 2. The new ones evolved by mutation. Sometimes, we can even observe that happening, or trace the mutation back to a known ancestor. Would you like to learn about it? .", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "In some cases yes, in others no. If the mutation gives a huge advantage, then there will be a decline in the size of the gene pool for a while (eg when the Australian rabbit population was reduced form 500 million to 100 million by myxomatosis, the gene pool strunk as a result and the genetic \"mutation\" that gave increased resistance spread throughout the whole population as a result). Most of the time though single mutations do not have such a huge advantage and so genetic variation is maintained.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Actually, I meant the behaviour refered to in her post was interesting.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "attractive ? are spiders attractive ? :(\r\nYou are not going to laugh if one of them , of the GOP women, that is, not a spider , get elected President, but I, in my safe heavenly haven will, for ... you get what you deserve :)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "The H1N1 flu, while initially scary because it was new, was hardly worth worrying about. My family contracted it last year, and other than being purely miserable for two long weeks, it was nothing out of the ordinary.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "If I may respond to that as well.\r\nEvery time a child is born, it's different than both parents. That's evolution. Change. Are you suggesting some mythological god had a role, or are you you a little more advanced and understand how human reproduction works on a basic level?\r\nBacteria, a better example, can actually swap genetic material, and \"evolve\" rapidly, without even needing to go through a sexual reproductive cycle.\r\nJust do a simple web search and I'm sure you'll learn some science..i.e. facts about reality.\r\nhttp://uanews.opi.arizona.edu/cgi-bi...ArticleID=3669\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So, when the tobacco companies say that there is no effect to passive smoking, that's gospel truth, when researchers and doctors demonstrate the harmful effects, that's propaganda. Riiiighhtt...", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I am quite tempted to list my religious affiliation as Zardoz in the upcoming census. \r\nOut of curiousity Z: How many followers do you need to become tax exempt and what percentage of the proceeds will you pass on to your subjects.\r\nAlso, which one of us will be closest to you in the ever after?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "i'm nothing if not a thoughtful atheist, but it's not skepticism that drove me from religion, but revulsion, and i absolutely refuse to let fear, the lowest of emotions and religions favorite trump card, to have any sway over my life when it comes to determining my religious beliefs. fear of judgement day is just one more trick religion has to get us to submit, and while i'm not surprised it worked to control illiterate savages and barbarians thousands of years past, i'm astounded so many people in this day an age allow themselves to fall prey to pascals wager.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "You can have reasoned faith, but it need not rely on 'empirical' evidence. There are very many forms of evidence.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "???? Everybody knows a \"gunwalker\" is like a dog walker and you get paid pretty good when you have a big clientele. DUH. My guns bigger than your gun because mine eats 7.62x39.emoticonXLove\r\nPlease not the manhood thing again.;)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So you think that ID is actually Christanity? [quote]But in usual fashion you will claim it is me who doesn't understand when it is you who must corrupt the truth with the lies and distortions you tell.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So the BBC folks are frauds and liars? You really are an idiot aren't you? Piltdown Bird is a colorful way of saying it was a Piltdown like fraud. \r\nNational Geographic knew it was a fake and published the article anyway.\r\nOf course you probably still believe in the original Piltdown don't you?\r\nYou probably believe the Nebraska Man and Haeckels speechless apes were real too.\r\nThere is an echo when you think isn't there?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "which leaves us with? if you said 'an appeal to majority' you win teh prize! you're not really leaving it to them when you're talking about enacting legislation based on a theory which is still under debate. most doctors won't prescribe marijuana in this country either. i guess we should just leave that to them though, since they're more qualified.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "are you illiterate or just stupid? when you try to use biblical passages dishonestly and out of context in order to convince people that god would favor an economy without social programs when, in fact, the exact opposite is clearly true, then you have perverted the word of god in the service of selfishness and greed. this aint hard.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "There you are NATO, you have justified a Final Solution for the \"Mexican problem\". Let me quote you \r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Then you are just throwing around words without knowing what they mean. Instead you give me a link to a page of pseudoscience. Are those the ones who lied to you?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "You know 'my kind'? How very presumptuous on your part. Then you know individual choice is the issue, not enforced medical procedures. You didn't answer the question regarding pregnant women who intend to carry to term being required to have a sonogram.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Nothing I have stated is incorrect. If I did you would get specific.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Actually it would be impossible for the monblock to spin. There is NO PLACE OUTSIDE OF IT from which to observe! Any observer would necessarily be inside the budding universe - no place else to go you see. Indeed its still impossible for us to know whether the universe as a whole is spinning or not!!!! Sorry I was being a bit ironic thinking you would see the point. Guess not though.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Prickolo\r\nSlyme would be a more appropriate name for you.\r\nJust some parting unfriendly advice\r\nHooroo emoticonXDonno", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "that was a cheap shot my friend.. lets keep at around an a*d*u*l*t level.. shall we?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I'd be happy to be of service in distributing those assets but Alan is probably armed.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Just three months. Man you have to be the best biology teacher in the world. Where did you learn to pull off a miracle like that?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And what does Marc do? Try to change the subject.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "that's pretty funny, the last two posts that is. that's actually interesting that the term started that way. i'm surprised that no one had coined a term before that though.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Crammed with them, sure, why not? Its easy, only a few million light years. The scientific method is used in weather forecasting too. ", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "[quote=justinecredible]making a snap judgement like that doesn't win you any brownie points either. genesis 18 - 19 deuteronomy 23:17 how about a more specific condemnation from the bible, then? will that help? leviticus 18:22 'you [masculine] shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.' leviticus 20:13 'if a man lies with a male as a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall be put to death, their blood is upon them.' any ambiguity there, jc? emoticonxrolleyes oh no, jc's going to start quoting scripture at me. better find a good search engine if you want to go there. :)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Hate to break it to you, but he's definitely NOT white.\r\nHe's Asian/African-American. His mother is of Asian descent and his father African descent. \r\nWhere do you get \"white?\"\r\nNow a better example of what you were trying to illustrate would have been Barrack Obama, who is exactly 50/50. \r\nHis mother is white, from Kansas; and his father black, from Africa (Kenya to be exact). Now he's a true definition of African-American. (No matter what Alan Keyes may say.)\r\n:p", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Don't worry, think everyone knows that your side doesn't have the sole monopoly on crazy.\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "And thats factually (and logically incorrect). There are many alternatives virtually an infinitude of them in fact.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Because you've presented no credible evidence to support the claims that private transactions are an established and major source of firearms for criminals.\r\n \r\n If you can't prove it's broken, you don't have grounds to call for fixing it.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yep, so much for a pastor knowing his sheep(le).\r\nIt's no wonder that they aren't noticed when they go missing.\r\nWhat ever happened for the shepherd going out and seeking his lost sheep to bring them back to the fold???\r\nAs to this case.\r\nI mentioned earlier about Rick Warren (author of A Purpose Driven Life)...he doesn't have armed guards in his mega church.\r\nBut, then again, he's not a fleecing WofF in shepherds clothing who seeks to ravenously devour a flock.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Let's allow same-sex marriage only. Then heterosexuals will have the same right to marry someone of the same sex. \r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "that is strange the last i read bin laden absolutely hates the regime in iran, mainly becasue iran is run by the shia and bin laden is a sunni. so iran should be held accountable for actions of bin laden ? it seems like before(iraq) people are trying to conjure up links between the real terrorist threat(aq) and unrelated nation.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "Well it doesn't go against the US constitution...Does it go against the California constitution? I haven't seen much credible evidence for this..then again I don't know much about the California constitution. Do you?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yes yes yes. We know you are bigoted against any non-christian. I am sure that the out of context quotes are totally misrepresenting Islam. But, your out of context quotes totally misrepresent Judaism too.. so that is no surprise.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Where? I don't see it. My monkey brain's fine but my eyes aren't what they used to be.\r\nI'm guessing we're through discussing the legality of armed self-defense in Australia given the flurry of OT links?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "what are you talking about?!?! the constitution was written in the late 1700's we have to go by thier meaning not a modern interpretation, this is most silly. as for your quote on adams i do not see how that even remotley applies to this discussion... care to expound?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "This sounds even more like a playground. \"I wanted to leave, but he called me a scaredy-cat and threw a stick at me. \"\r\nemoticonXCry", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "'if it's beside the point' the why bring it up, jyoshu. why 'talk out of both sides of your mouth'? and your right wing talking points are stale and tired. comparing different civil rights movements is not 'piggybacking'. and incidentally, why is it that all of the blacks in congress for equal rights for glbt people? why is it that they are the most passionate defenders of glbt people? there are black gay people who suffered along with the straight black people. there are female gay people that suffered along with the women. on top of such discrimination, gay people may have had no family support. some were probably lobotomized against their wishes. some were raped, some were probably murdered by people they thought would understand what discrimination was all about. no, my friend. it is disingenuous to say with certainty that you know they have not.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "This rates an 8 out of 10 on the hypocracy scale. Weren't you just scolding people both for using false analogies and for citing emotionally laden imagery for political purposes? Tsk tsk.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "first of all, the claim is that random changes in molecules do not produce bodiliy structures. Proteins are molecules and are thus not what I was referring to. Second, there are no new enzymes or new proteins produced by any mutations...and not only that but none of those mutations have been shown to be random. So for all the billions of bodily structures in the world, ToE cannot account for even ONE of them.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh yeah, they made all that stuff up for people who believe in that ;)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "then you would want me to be something god did not create me to be? silly, i 'd say! humans are part of the animal kingdom. mammals if i remember from biology. are you not an animal? if not, maybe the mothership will come and pick you up soon.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "No, back to school... turn in what educational credntials you feel you have, and just stay at the coffeehouses... at least you have a .005% of hearing someone ineject some truth in one of those sidewalk tete a' tete's you nutters are so fond of... but here you are dead wrong. Have you ever heard of an egg? ever heard of a sperm? An egg is still considered a multiple cell organism, and a sperm as well. You're gonna have a hard time pulling that one off.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "So what?? Who cares what the number of assumptions are? What we care about is whether the idea is correct. And to determine whether it is correct, you have to have data, not counting assumptions.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "That who knows? Your use of \"we\" does not include many religious folk I assume. I would claim to know of much interaction that God has and has had with the world.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "oh yeah! i remember tulip. calvinism seems to be more realistic, as it's more correctly grounded in man's sinful nature.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Consciousness is created (in my view) by the brain - but I guess it could be described as non-material in the sense that the certainty of its detection is a subjective event. I know that the activity of brain \"waves\" can be monitored, but the stream of consciousness that they give rise to is entirely interior to the mental environment.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "I actually laughed out loud at that one!\r\nImagine how gay black people such as myself should feel. Maybe I should just lie down and call myself sidewalk.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "That link reads more like a children's story book than a science text.\r\nI wondered what they could come up with, I guess the answer is nothing.\r\nWaxy", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Yeeees, that's why option 4 as I wrote it says \"reinterpret\" as opposed to \"reject.\" \r\nHaving a bad reading day, eh?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "The US is 3 trillion dollars in debt, abortion is not clear cut (just visit a debate), and you appear to be stereotyping democrats. Also, you may need to read the first ammendment again. For your answer to work, people would have to agree with you first, then they would understand (and agree with) you.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Once again, are you going to debate, or are you just going to be an immature little XXXXX?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Amusing coming from someone who falsely claimed another user misused the term \"light year.\" \r\nIf I am so ignorant, explain how your argument does not require exactly what I said: That God operated the named light sources on a very different set of physical laws and removed all evidence of their existence to meld them with the current set of physical laws that we know do not support young Earth Creationism. \r\nI'm betting you don't even understand your original argument. Prove me wrong. Explain how it does not result in God being a liar. \r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Explained away means what? If you don't agree with the mainstream you are wrong. He has not been refuted and he has lots of pictures. Why not go to his site and look?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "'on site'? so your going to build h2 production plants in everybody's garage? how do you plan on pressurizing the h2 in your garage? do you plan on including a near absolute zero refrigerator to be part of the system or are you going to require that everyone have $1million worth of explosion-proof handling equipment, storage tanks, etc.,? emoticonxconfused and i apologize if i'm wed to the laws of chemistry and physics. it's just so darn hard for me, a trained scientist practicing my trade for 30 years, to ignore them.emoticonxrolleyes", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "because i haven't seen evidence to convince me otherwise. what have you said that i've 'distorted?' you keep accusing me of putting words in my mouth, but you're reluctant to specify. why should i assume that such people do exist? the burden of proof is yours.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "When talking to a person professing Christianity, the Bible is binding. If the Bible advises that abortion is murder, then it is so regardless of what the secular systems of the day have to say about it. When talking with one accepting the principles of Christianity, the premiere of those being that the Bible is binding, the existence of the soul is not up for debate. The position of Bassman, I believe, would be that there is no legitimate right to terminate a pregnancy, especially from the stand-point of the Bible, which of course, is binding to those professing Christianity.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Wasn't there some genius that wanted firearms locked up as a manditory model posting here? Gee if they can steal from the police station what punishment can we mete out for us unwashed working slobs for not locking up and reporting stolen firearms? Got them into Chicago even with its strict gun laws. Wonder if they complied with the IL gun laws? Yea right.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Then, how much money should spend on the war on terror? Should we bankrupt the country to do it? Is it necessary to spend so much that we go bankrupt, or is it better to wisely spend the money we have and to fight an intellegent war against terror?", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "How can I make a 'legitimate' argument with someone who believes all religions are based on ' a man in the sky'.\r\nIts like arguing about Oriental culture with someone that thinks China is in Africa...futile.\r\nChina is not in Africa Xcaliber...no need to google it lol:)", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "Sorry, I hadn't realised your one-man legislature had passed a law forbidding discussion of equal protections. I'll discuss what I damn well please.\r\n", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "think about what you just typed, that doesn't make any sense.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "accountable by trial? by following the advice given to them? when people screw up, they are culpable for trial. how about holding the advisors accountable? oh wait!! how about holding the people who put the advisors in power accountable? oh shit!!! hold the government accountable! hold the people who put government accountable. hold every citizen accountable. when you're done acting hysterical, let's get back on topic. nice work, captain hindsight. you put yourself at trial. 'i shouldn't have acted like i know more about drilling for oil than oil companies'. apparently you are easily influenced by television. to recap: when an oil company screws up by cost-cutting, which leads to a major environmental disaster and the loss of eleven lives, we hold them accountable by trial. committees like the one which found bp et al culpable are instrumental in building a case against bp.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "HYP" + }, + { + "sentence": "Again, you speak as if gays and lesbians are not worthy of their relationships being sacred to them. As if gays and lesbians are unable to hold dear any concept of commitment, loyalty, partnership. What a sad and mean little man you are.", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "GEN" + }, + { + "sentence": "ok, i'll repeat what duo_maxwell has said, that you are a facist. why are you so insulted by being called that? if it quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, it must be a facist. we moderates are proud to be moderates, why don't you like to be called what you truly are? same logic here, right?", + "sentiment": 1, + "source": "RQ" + }, + { + "sentence": "I think that what you two are doing is simply trading evidences. Saying someone is 'wrong' and directing them to a atheist web-site is not proof. You should merely be saying, 'here is an alternative argument'I say this because I can access a number of science posts that state the exact opposite of what you say, and show that they can find evidence for a flood.", + "sentiment": 0, + "source": "GEN" + } +] \ No newline at end of file