Preamble

Preamble

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Preamble'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Preamble.

Explanation: Preamble specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Preamble' under the Constitution of India.


Preamble

प्रस्तावना

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'प्रस्तावना' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Preamble की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Preamble विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'प्रस्तावना' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Preamble

Preamble

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Preamble (Preamble).

Output: Article Preamble establishes the fundamental framework for 'Preamble' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its .... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Preamble

प्रस्तावना

Input: अनुच्छेद Preamble ('प्रस्तावना') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Preamble भारत के संविधान में 'प्रस्तावना' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its ...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Preamble

Preamble

Input:
Premise: WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens: JUSTICE, social, economic and political; LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;
EQUALITY of status and of opportunity; and to promote among them all FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation; IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Preamble' under Preamble.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Preamble

प्रस्तावना

Input:
आधार (Premise): WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens: JUSTICE, social, economic and political; LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;
EQUALITY of status and of opportunity; and to promote among them all FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation; IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Preamble के तहत 'प्रस्तावना' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Preamble

Preamble

Input:
Premise: WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens: JUSTICE, social, economic and political; LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;
EQUALITY of status and of opportunity; and to promote among them all FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation; IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Preamble'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Preamble

प्रस्तावना

Input:
आधार (Premise): WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens: JUSTICE, social, economic and political; LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;
EQUALITY of status and of opportunity; and to promote among them all FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation; IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'प्रस्तावना' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Preamble

Preamble

Input:
Premise: WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens: JUSTICE, social, economic and political; LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;
EQUALITY of status and of opportunity; and to promote among them all FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation; IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Preamble

प्रस्तावना

Input:
आधार (Premise): WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens: JUSTICE, social, economic and political; LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;
EQUALITY of status and of opportunity; and to promote among them all FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation; IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 1

Name and Territory of the Union

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Name and Territory of the Union'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 1.

Explanation: Article 1 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Name and Territory of the Union' under the Constitution of India.


Article 1

संघ का नाम और क्षेत्र

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'संघ का नाम और क्षेत्र' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 1 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 1 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'संघ का नाम और क्षेत्र' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 1

Name and Territory of the Union

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 1 (Name and Territory of the Union).

Output:
Article Article 1 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Name and Territory of the Union' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.
(2) The States and the territories thereof shall be as specified in the First Schedule.
(3) The.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 1

संघ का नाम और क्षेत्र

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 1 ('संघ का नाम और क्षेत्र') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 1 भारत के संविधान में 'संघ का नाम और क्षेत्र' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.
(2) The States and the territories thereof shall be as specified in the First Schedule.
(3) The...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 1

Name and Territory of the Union

Input:
Premise: (1) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.
(2) The States and the territories thereof shall be as specified in the First Schedule.
(3) The territory of India shall comprise —
(a) the territories of the States;
(b) the Union territories specified in the First Schedule; and
(c) such other territories as may be acquired.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Name and Territory of the Union' under Article 1.

Output: Entailment


Article 1

संघ का नाम और क्षेत्र

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.
(2) The States and the territories thereof shall be as specified in the First Schedule.
(3) The territory of India shall comprise —
(a) the territories of the States;
(b) the Union territories specified in the First Schedule; and
(c) such other territories as may be acquired.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 1 के तहत 'संघ का नाम और क्षेत्र' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 1

Name and Territory of the Union

Input:
Premise: (1) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.
(2) The States and the territories thereof shall be as specified in the First Schedule.
(3) The territory of India shall comprise —
(a) the territories of the States;
(b) the Union territories specified in the First Schedule; and
(c) such other territories as may be acquired.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Name and Territory of the Union'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 1

संघ का नाम और क्षेत्र

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.
(2) The States and the territories thereof shall be as specified in the First Schedule.
(3) The territory of India shall comprise —
(a) the territories of the States;
(b) the Union territories specified in the First Schedule; and
(c) such other territories as may be acquired.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'संघ का नाम और क्षेत्र' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 1

Name and Territory of the Union

Input:
Premise: (1) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.
(2) The States and the territories thereof shall be as specified in the First Schedule.
(3) The territory of India shall comprise —
(a) the territories of the States;
(b) the Union territories specified in the First Schedule; and
(c) such other territories as may be acquired.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 1

संघ का नाम और क्षेत्र

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.
(2) The States and the territories thereof shall be as specified in the First Schedule.
(3) The territory of India shall comprise —
(a) the territories of the States;
(b) the Union territories specified in the First Schedule; and
(c) such other territories as may be acquired.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 2

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Admission or Establishment of New States'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 2.

Explanation: Article 2 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Admission or Establishment of New States' under the Constitution of India.


Article 2

नये राज्यों का प्रवेश या स्थापना

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'नये राज्यों का प्रवेश या स्थापना' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 2 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 2 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'नये राज्यों का प्रवेश या स्थापना' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 2

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 2 (Admission or Establishment of New States).

Output: Article Article 2 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Admission or Establishment of New States' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Parliament may by law admit into the Union, or establish, new States on such terms and conditions as it thinks fit.. This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 2

नये राज्यों का प्रवेश या स्थापना

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 2 ('नये राज्यों का प्रवेश या स्थापना') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 2 भारत के संविधान में 'नये राज्यों का प्रवेश या स्थापना' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Parliament may by law admit into the Union, or establish, new States on such terms and conditions as it thinks fit.। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 2

Input:
Premise: Parliament may by law admit into the Union, or establish, new States on such terms and conditions as it thinks fit.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Admission or Establishment of New States' under Article 2.

Output: Entailment


Article 2

नये राज्यों का प्रवेश या स्थापना

Input:
आधार (Premise): Parliament may by law admit into the Union, or establish, new States on such terms and conditions as it thinks fit.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 2 के तहत 'नये राज्यों का प्रवेश या स्थापना' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 2

Input:
Premise: Parliament may by law admit into the Union, or establish, new States on such terms and conditions as it thinks fit.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Admission or Establishment of New States'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 2

नये राज्यों का प्रवेश या स्थापना

Input:
आधार (Premise): Parliament may by law admit into the Union, or establish, new States on such terms and conditions as it thinks fit.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'नये राज्यों का प्रवेश या स्थापना' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 2

Input:
Premise: Parliament may by law admit into the Union, or establish, new States on such terms and conditions as it thinks fit.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 2

नये राज्यों का प्रवेश या स्थापना

Input:
आधार (Premise): Parliament may by law admit into the Union, or establish, new States on such terms and conditions as it thinks fit.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 4

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Laws Made Under Articles 2 and 3 to Provide for the Amendment of the First and the Fourth Schedules and Supplemental, Incidental and Consequential Matters'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 4.

Explanation: Article 4 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Laws Made Under Articles 2 and 3 to Provide for the Amendment of the First and the Fourth Schedules and Supplemental, Incidental and Consequential Matters' under the Constitution of India.


Article 4

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'पहली और चौथी अनुसूचियों और पूरक, आकस्मिक और परिणामी मामलों में संशोधन के लिए अनुच्छेद 2 और 3 के तहत बनाए गए कानून' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 4 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 4 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'पहली और चौथी अनुसूचियों और पूरक, आकस्मिक और परिणामी मामलों में संशोधन के लिए अनुच्छेद 2 और 3 के तहत बनाए गए कानून' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 4

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 4 (Laws Made Under Articles 2 and 3 to Provide for the Amendment of the First and the Fourth Schedules and Supplemental, Incidental and Consequential Matters).

Output: Article Article 4 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Laws Made Under Articles 2 and 3 to Provide for the Amendment of the First and the Fourth Schedules and Supplemental, Incidental and Consequential Matters' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) Any law referred to in article 2 or article 3 shall contain such provisions for the amendment of the First Schedule and the Fourth Schedule as may.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 4

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 4 ('पहली और चौथी अनुसूचियों और पूरक, आकस्मिक और परिणामी मामलों में संशोधन के लिए अनुच्छेद 2 और 3 के तहत बनाए गए कानून') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 4 भारत के संविधान में 'पहली और चौथी अनुसूचियों और पूरक, आकस्मिक और परिणामी मामलों में संशोधन के लिए अनुच्छेद 2 और 3 के तहत बनाए गए कानून' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) Any law referred to in article 2 or article 3 shall contain such provisions for the amendment of the First Schedule and the Fourth Schedule as may...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 4

Input:
Premise: (1) Any law referred to in article 2 or article 3 shall contain such provisions for the amendment of the First Schedule and the Fourth Schedule as may be necessary to give effect to the provisions of the law and may also contain such supplemental, incidental and consequential provisions (including provisions as to representation in Parliament and in the Legislature or Legislatures of the State or States affected by such law) as Parliament may deem necessary.
(2) No such law as aforesaid shall be deemed to be an amendment of this Constitution for the purposes of article 368.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Laws Made Under Articles 2 and 3 to Provide for the Amendment of the First and the Fourth Schedules and Supplemental, Incidental and Consequential Matters' under Article 4.

Output: Entailment


Article 4

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Any law referred to in article 2 or article 3 shall contain such provisions for the amendment of the First Schedule and the Fourth Schedule as may be necessary to give effect to the provisions of the law and may also contain such supplemental, incidental and consequential provisions (including provisions as to representation in Parliament and in the Legislature or Legislatures of the State or States affected by such law) as Parliament may deem necessary.
(2) No such law as aforesaid shall be deemed to be an amendment of this Constitution for the purposes of article 368.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 4 के तहत 'पहली और चौथी अनुसूचियों और पूरक, आकस्मिक और परिणामी मामलों में संशोधन के लिए अनुच्छेद 2 और 3 के तहत बनाए गए कानून' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 4

Input:
Premise: (1) Any law referred to in article 2 or article 3 shall contain such provisions for the amendment of the First Schedule and the Fourth Schedule as may be necessary to give effect to the provisions of the law and may also contain such supplemental, incidental and consequential provisions (including provisions as to representation in Parliament and in the Legislature or Legislatures of the State or States affected by such law) as Parliament may deem necessary.
(2) No such law as aforesaid shall be deemed to be an amendment of this Constitution for the purposes of article 368.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Laws Made Under Articles 2 and 3 to Provide for the Amendment of the First and the Fourth Schedules and Supplemental, Incidental and Consequential Matters'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 4

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Any law referred to in article 2 or article 3 shall contain such provisions for the amendment of the First Schedule and the Fourth Schedule as may be necessary to give effect to the provisions of the law and may also contain such supplemental, incidental and consequential provisions (including provisions as to representation in Parliament and in the Legislature or Legislatures of the State or States affected by such law) as Parliament may deem necessary.
(2) No such law as aforesaid shall be deemed to be an amendment of this Constitution for the purposes of article 368.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'पहली और चौथी अनुसूचियों और पूरक, आकस्मिक और परिणामी मामलों में संशोधन के लिए अनुच्छेद 2 और 3 के तहत बनाए गए कानून' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 4

Input:
Premise: (1) Any law referred to in article 2 or article 3 shall contain such provisions for the amendment of the First Schedule and the Fourth Schedule as may be necessary to give effect to the provisions of the law and may also contain such supplemental, incidental and consequential provisions (including provisions as to representation in Parliament and in the Legislature or Legislatures of the State or States affected by such law) as Parliament may deem necessary.
(2) No such law as aforesaid shall be deemed to be an amendment of this Constitution for the purposes of article 368.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 4

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Any law referred to in article 2 or article 3 shall contain such provisions for the amendment of the First Schedule and the Fourth Schedule as may be necessary to give effect to the provisions of the law and may also contain such supplemental, incidental and consequential provisions (including provisions as to representation in Parliament and in the Legislature or Legislatures of the State or States affected by such law) as Parliament may deem necessary.
(2) No such law as aforesaid shall be deemed to be an amendment of this Constitution for the purposes of article 368.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 5

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Citizenship at the Commencement of the Constitution'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 5.

Explanation: Article 5 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Citizenship at the Commencement of the Constitution' under the Constitution of India.


Article 5

संविधान के प्रारंभ में नागरिकता

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'संविधान के प्रारंभ में नागरिकता' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 5 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 5 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'संविधान के प्रारंभ में नागरिकता' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 5

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 5 (Citizenship at the Commencement of the Constitution).

Output:
Article Article 5 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Citizenship at the Commencement of the Constitution' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: At the commencement of this Constitution, every person who has his domicile in the territory of India and —
(a) who was born in the territory of India.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 5

संविधान के प्रारंभ में नागरिकता

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 5 ('संविधान के प्रारंभ में नागरिकता') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 5 भारत के संविधान में 'संविधान के प्रारंभ में नागरिकता' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: At the commencement of this Constitution, every person who has his domicile in the territory of India and —
(a) who was born in the territory of India...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 5

Input:
Premise: At the commencement of this Constitution, every person who has his domicile in the territory of India and —
(a) who was born in the territory of India; or
(b) either of whose parents was born in the territory of India; or
(c) who has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India for not less than five years immediately preceding such commencement,
shall be a citizen of India.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Citizenship at the Commencement of the Constitution' under Article 5.

Output: Entailment


Article 5

संविधान के प्रारंभ में नागरिकता

Input:
आधार (Premise): At the commencement of this Constitution, every person who has his domicile in the territory of India and —
(a) who was born in the territory of India; or
(b) either of whose parents was born in the territory of India; or
(c) who has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India for not less than five years immediately preceding such commencement,
shall be a citizen of India.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 5 के तहत 'संविधान के प्रारंभ में नागरिकता' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 5

Input:
Premise: At the commencement of this Constitution, every person who has his domicile in the territory of India and —
(a) who was born in the territory of India; or
(b) either of whose parents was born in the territory of India; or
(c) who has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India for not less than five years immediately preceding such commencement,
shall be a citizen of India.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Citizenship at the Commencement of the Constitution'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 5

संविधान के प्रारंभ में नागरिकता

Input:
आधार (Premise): At the commencement of this Constitution, every person who has his domicile in the territory of India and —
(a) who was born in the territory of India; or
(b) either of whose parents was born in the territory of India; or
(c) who has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India for not less than five years immediately preceding such commencement,
shall be a citizen of India.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'संविधान के प्रारंभ में नागरिकता' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 5

Input:
Premise: At the commencement of this Constitution, every person who has his domicile in the territory of India and —
(a) who was born in the territory of India; or
(b) either of whose parents was born in the territory of India; or
(c) who has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India for not less than five years immediately preceding such commencement,
shall be a citizen of India.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 5

संविधान के प्रारंभ में नागरिकता

Input:
आधार (Premise): At the commencement of this Constitution, every person who has his domicile in the territory of India and —
(a) who was born in the territory of India; or
(b) either of whose parents was born in the territory of India; or
(c) who has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India for not less than five years immediately preceding such commencement,
shall be a citizen of India.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 6

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Rights of Citizenship of Certain Persons Who Have Migrated to India from Pakistan'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 6.

Explanation: Article 6 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Rights of Citizenship of Certain Persons Who Have Migrated to India from Pakistan' under the Constitution of India.


Article 6

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'पाकिस्तान से भारत में प्रवास करने वाले कुछ व्यक्तियों के नागरिकता के अधिकार' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 6 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 6 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'पाकिस्तान से भारत में प्रवास करने वाले कुछ व्यक्तियों के नागरिकता के अधिकार' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 6

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 6 (Rights of Citizenship of Certain Persons Who Have Migrated to India from Pakistan).

Output: Article Article 6 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Rights of Citizenship of Certain Persons Who Have Migrated to India from Pakistan' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Notwithstanding anything in article 5, a person who has migrated to the territory of India from the territory now included in Pakistan shall be deemed.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 6

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 6 ('पाकिस्तान से भारत में प्रवास करने वाले कुछ व्यक्तियों के नागरिकता के अधिकार') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 6 भारत के संविधान में 'पाकिस्तान से भारत में प्रवास करने वाले कुछ व्यक्तियों के नागरिकता के अधिकार' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Notwithstanding anything in article 5, a person who has migrated to the territory of India from the territory now included in Pakistan shall be deemed...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 6

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything in article 5, a person who has migrated to the territory of India from the territory now included in Pakistan shall be deemed to be a citizen of India at the commencement of this Constitution if —
(a) he or either of his parents or any of his grandparents was born in India as defined in the Government of India Act, 1935 (as originally enacted); and
(b) (i) in the case where such person has so migrated before the nineteenth day of July, 1948, he has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India since the date of his migration, or
(ii) in the case where such person has so migrated on or after the nineteenth day of July, 1948, he has been registered as a citizen of India by an officer appointed in that behalf by the Government of the Dominion of India on an application made by him therefor to such officer before the commencement of this Constitution in the form and manner prescribed by that Government:
Provided that no person shall be so registered unless he has been resident in the territory of India for at least six months immediately preceding the date of his application.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Rights of Citizenship of Certain Persons Who Have Migrated to India from Pakistan' under Article 6.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 6

Input:
आधार (Premise): Notwithstanding anything in article 5, a person who has migrated to the territory of India from the territory now included in Pakistan shall be deemed to be a citizen of India at the commencement of this Constitution if —
(a) he or either of his parents or any of his grandparents was born in India as defined in the Government of India Act, 1935 (as originally enacted); and
(b) (i) in the case where such person has so migrated before the nineteenth day of July, 1948, he has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India since the date of his migration, or
(ii) in the case where such person has so migrated on or after the nineteenth day of July, 1948, he has been registered as a citizen of India by an officer appointed in that behalf by the Government of the Dominion of India on an application made by him therefor to such officer before the commencement of this Constitution in the form and manner prescribed by that Government:
Provided that no person shall be so registered unless he has been resident in the territory of India for at least six months immediately preceding the date of his application.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 6 के तहत 'पाकिस्तान से भारत में प्रवास करने वाले कुछ व्यक्तियों के नागरिकता के अधिकार' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 6

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything in article 5, a person who has migrated to the territory of India from the territory now included in Pakistan shall be deemed to be a citizen of India at the commencement of this Constitution if —
(a) he or either of his parents or any of his grandparents was born in India as defined in the Government of India Act, 1935 (as originally enacted); and
(b) (i) in the case where such person has so migrated before the nineteenth day of July, 1948, he has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India since the date of his migration, or
(ii) in the case where such person has so migrated on or after the nineteenth day of July, 1948, he has been registered as a citizen of India by an officer appointed in that behalf by the Government of the Dominion of India on an application made by him therefor to such officer before the commencement of this Constitution in the form and manner prescribed by that Government:
Provided that no person shall be so registered unless he has been resident in the territory of India for at least six months immediately preceding the date of his application.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Rights of Citizenship of Certain Persons Who Have Migrated to India from Pakistan'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 6

Input:
आधार (Premise): Notwithstanding anything in article 5, a person who has migrated to the territory of India from the territory now included in Pakistan shall be deemed to be a citizen of India at the commencement of this Constitution if —
(a) he or either of his parents or any of his grandparents was born in India as defined in the Government of India Act, 1935 (as originally enacted); and
(b) (i) in the case where such person has so migrated before the nineteenth day of July, 1948, he has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India since the date of his migration, or
(ii) in the case where such person has so migrated on or after the nineteenth day of July, 1948, he has been registered as a citizen of India by an officer appointed in that behalf by the Government of the Dominion of India on an application made by him therefor to such officer before the commencement of this Constitution in the form and manner prescribed by that Government:
Provided that no person shall be so registered unless he has been resident in the territory of India for at least six months immediately preceding the date of his application.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'पाकिस्तान से भारत में प्रवास करने वाले कुछ व्यक्तियों के नागरिकता के अधिकार' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 6

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything in article 5, a person who has migrated to the territory of India from the territory now included in Pakistan shall be deemed to be a citizen of India at the commencement of this Constitution if —
(a) he or either of his parents or any of his grandparents was born in India as defined in the Government of India Act, 1935 (as originally enacted); and
(b) (i) in the case where such person has so migrated before the nineteenth day of July, 1948, he has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India since the date of his migration, or
(ii) in the case where such person has so migrated on or after the nineteenth day of July, 1948, he has been registered as a citizen of India by an officer appointed in that behalf by the Government of the Dominion of India on an application made by him therefor to such officer before the commencement of this Constitution in the form and manner prescribed by that Government:
Provided that no person shall be so registered unless he has been resident in the territory of India for at least six months immediately preceding the date of his application.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 6

Input:
आधार (Premise): Notwithstanding anything in article 5, a person who has migrated to the territory of India from the territory now included in Pakistan shall be deemed to be a citizen of India at the commencement of this Constitution if —
(a) he or either of his parents or any of his grandparents was born in India as defined in the Government of India Act, 1935 (as originally enacted); and
(b) (i) in the case where such person has so migrated before the nineteenth day of July, 1948, he has been ordinarily resident in the territory of India since the date of his migration, or
(ii) in the case where such person has so migrated on or after the nineteenth day of July, 1948, he has been registered as a citizen of India by an officer appointed in that behalf by the Government of the Dominion of India on an application made by him therefor to such officer before the commencement of this Constitution in the form and manner prescribed by that Government:
Provided that no person shall be so registered unless he has been resident in the territory of India for at least six months immediately preceding the date of his application.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 7

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Rights of Citizenship of Certain Migrants to Pakistan'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 7.

Explanation: Article 7 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Rights of Citizenship of Certain Migrants to Pakistan' under the Constitution of India.


Article 7

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'पाकिस्तान में कुछ प्रवासियों के नागरिकता के अधिकार' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 7 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 7 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'पाकिस्तान में कुछ प्रवासियों के नागरिकता के अधिकार' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 7

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 7 (Rights of Citizenship of Certain Migrants to Pakistan).

Output: Article Article 7 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Rights of Citizenship of Certain Migrants to Pakistan' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Notwithstanding anything in articles 5 and 6, a person who has after the first day of March, 1947, migrated from the territory of India to the territo.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 7

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 7 ('पाकिस्तान में कुछ प्रवासियों के नागरिकता के अधिकार') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 7 भारत के संविधान में 'पाकिस्तान में कुछ प्रवासियों के नागरिकता के अधिकार' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Notwithstanding anything in articles 5 and 6, a person who has after the first day of March, 1947, migrated from the territory of India to the territo...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 7

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything in articles 5 and 6, a person who has after the first day of March, 1947, migrated from the territory of India to the territory now included in Pakistan shall not be deemed to be a citizen of India:
Provided that nothing in this article shall apply to a person who, after having so migrated to the territory now included in Pakistan, has returned to the territory of India under a permit for resettlement or permanent return issued by or under the authority of any law and every such person shall for the purposes of clause (b) of article 6 be deemed to have migrated to the territory of India after the nineteenth day of July, 1948.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Rights of Citizenship of Certain Migrants to Pakistan' under Article 7.

Output: Entailment


Article 7

Input:
आधार (Premise): Notwithstanding anything in articles 5 and 6, a person who has after the first day of March, 1947, migrated from the territory of India to the territory now included in Pakistan shall not be deemed to be a citizen of India:
Provided that nothing in this article shall apply to a person who, after having so migrated to the territory now included in Pakistan, has returned to the territory of India under a permit for resettlement or permanent return issued by or under the authority of any law and every such person shall for the purposes of clause (b) of article 6 be deemed to have migrated to the territory of India after the nineteenth day of July, 1948.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 7 के तहत 'पाकिस्तान में कुछ प्रवासियों के नागरिकता के अधिकार' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 7

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything in articles 5 and 6, a person who has after the first day of March, 1947, migrated from the territory of India to the territory now included in Pakistan shall not be deemed to be a citizen of India:
Provided that nothing in this article shall apply to a person who, after having so migrated to the territory now included in Pakistan, has returned to the territory of India under a permit for resettlement or permanent return issued by or under the authority of any law and every such person shall for the purposes of clause (b) of article 6 be deemed to have migrated to the territory of India after the nineteenth day of July, 1948.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Rights of Citizenship of Certain Migrants to Pakistan'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 7

Input:
आधार (Premise): Notwithstanding anything in articles 5 and 6, a person who has after the first day of March, 1947, migrated from the territory of India to the territory now included in Pakistan shall not be deemed to be a citizen of India:
Provided that nothing in this article shall apply to a person who, after having so migrated to the territory now included in Pakistan, has returned to the territory of India under a permit for resettlement or permanent return issued by or under the authority of any law and every such person shall for the purposes of clause (b) of article 6 be deemed to have migrated to the territory of India after the nineteenth day of July, 1948.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'पाकिस्तान में कुछ प्रवासियों के नागरिकता के अधिकार' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 7

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything in articles 5 and 6, a person who has after the first day of March, 1947, migrated from the territory of India to the territory now included in Pakistan shall not be deemed to be a citizen of India:
Provided that nothing in this article shall apply to a person who, after having so migrated to the territory now included in Pakistan, has returned to the territory of India under a permit for resettlement or permanent return issued by or under the authority of any law and every such person shall for the purposes of clause (b) of article 6 be deemed to have migrated to the territory of India after the nineteenth day of July, 1948.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 7

Input:
आधार (Premise): Notwithstanding anything in articles 5 and 6, a person who has after the first day of March, 1947, migrated from the territory of India to the territory now included in Pakistan shall not be deemed to be a citizen of India:
Provided that nothing in this article shall apply to a person who, after having so migrated to the territory now included in Pakistan, has returned to the territory of India under a permit for resettlement or permanent return issued by or under the authority of any law and every such person shall for the purposes of clause (b) of article 6 be deemed to have migrated to the territory of India after the nineteenth day of July, 1948.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 8

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Rights of Citizenship of Certain Persons of Indian Origin Residing Outside India'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 8.

Explanation: Article 8 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Rights of Citizenship of Certain Persons of Indian Origin Residing Outside India' under the Constitution of India.


Article 8

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'भारत से बाहर रहने वाले भारतीय मूल के कुछ व्यक्तियों के नागरिकता के अधिकार' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 8 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 8 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'भारत से बाहर रहने वाले भारतीय मूल के कुछ व्यक्तियों के नागरिकता के अधिकार' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 8

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 8 (Rights of Citizenship of Certain Persons of Indian Origin Residing Outside India).

Output: Article Article 8 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Rights of Citizenship of Certain Persons of Indian Origin Residing Outside India' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Notwithstanding anything in article 5, any person who or either of whose parents or any of whose grandparents was born in India as defined in the Gove.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 8

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 8 ('भारत से बाहर रहने वाले भारतीय मूल के कुछ व्यक्तियों के नागरिकता के अधिकार') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 8 भारत के संविधान में 'भारत से बाहर रहने वाले भारतीय मूल के कुछ व्यक्तियों के नागरिकता के अधिकार' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Notwithstanding anything in article 5, any person who or either of whose parents or any of whose grandparents was born in India as defined in the Gove...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 8

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything in article 5, any person who or either of whose parents or any of whose grandparents was born in India as defined in the Government of India Act, 1935 (as originally enacted), and who is ordinarily residing in any country outside India as so defined shall be deemed to be a citizen of India if he has been registered as a citizen of India by the diplomatic or consular representative of India in the country where he is for the time being residing on an application made by him therefor to such diplomatic or consular representative, whether before or after the commencement of this Constitution, in the form and manner prescribed by the Government of the Dominion of India or the Government of India

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Rights of Citizenship of Certain Persons of Indian Origin Residing Outside India' under Article 8.

Output: Entailment


Article 8

Input:
आधार (Premise): Notwithstanding anything in article 5, any person who or either of whose parents or any of whose grandparents was born in India as defined in the Government of India Act, 1935 (as originally enacted), and who is ordinarily residing in any country outside India as so defined shall be deemed to be a citizen of India if he has been registered as a citizen of India by the diplomatic or consular representative of India in the country where he is for the time being residing on an application made by him therefor to such diplomatic or consular representative, whether before or after the commencement of this Constitution, in the form and manner prescribed by the Government of the Dominion of India or the Government of India

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 8 के तहत 'भारत से बाहर रहने वाले भारतीय मूल के कुछ व्यक्तियों के नागरिकता के अधिकार' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 8

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything in article 5, any person who or either of whose parents or any of whose grandparents was born in India as defined in the Government of India Act, 1935 (as originally enacted), and who is ordinarily residing in any country outside India as so defined shall be deemed to be a citizen of India if he has been registered as a citizen of India by the diplomatic or consular representative of India in the country where he is for the time being residing on an application made by him therefor to such diplomatic or consular representative, whether before or after the commencement of this Constitution, in the form and manner prescribed by the Government of the Dominion of India or the Government of India

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Rights of Citizenship of Certain Persons of Indian Origin Residing Outside India'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 8

Input:
आधार (Premise): Notwithstanding anything in article 5, any person who or either of whose parents or any of whose grandparents was born in India as defined in the Government of India Act, 1935 (as originally enacted), and who is ordinarily residing in any country outside India as so defined shall be deemed to be a citizen of India if he has been registered as a citizen of India by the diplomatic or consular representative of India in the country where he is for the time being residing on an application made by him therefor to such diplomatic or consular representative, whether before or after the commencement of this Constitution, in the form and manner prescribed by the Government of the Dominion of India or the Government of India

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'भारत से बाहर रहने वाले भारतीय मूल के कुछ व्यक्तियों के नागरिकता के अधिकार' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 8

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything in article 5, any person who or either of whose parents or any of whose grandparents was born in India as defined in the Government of India Act, 1935 (as originally enacted), and who is ordinarily residing in any country outside India as so defined shall be deemed to be a citizen of India if he has been registered as a citizen of India by the diplomatic or consular representative of India in the country where he is for the time being residing on an application made by him therefor to such diplomatic or consular representative, whether before or after the commencement of this Constitution, in the form and manner prescribed by the Government of the Dominion of India or the Government of India

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 8

Input:
आधार (Premise): Notwithstanding anything in article 5, any person who or either of whose parents or any of whose grandparents was born in India as defined in the Government of India Act, 1935 (as originally enacted), and who is ordinarily residing in any country outside India as so defined shall be deemed to be a citizen of India if he has been registered as a citizen of India by the diplomatic or consular representative of India in the country where he is for the time being residing on an application made by him therefor to such diplomatic or consular representative, whether before or after the commencement of this Constitution, in the form and manner prescribed by the Government of the Dominion of India or the Government of India

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 9

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Persons Voluntarily Acquiring Citizenship of a Foreign State Not to Be Citizens'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 9.

Explanation: Article 9 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Persons Voluntarily Acquiring Citizenship of a Foreign State Not to Be Citizens' under the Constitution of India.


Article 9

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'स्वेच्छा से किसी विदेशी राज्य की नागरिकता प्राप्त करने वाले व्यक्तियों को नागरिक नहीं बनना' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 9 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 9 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'स्वेच्छा से किसी विदेशी राज्य की नागरिकता प्राप्त करने वाले व्यक्तियों को नागरिक नहीं बनना' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 9

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 9 (Persons Voluntarily Acquiring Citizenship of a Foreign State Not to Be Citizens).

Output: Article Article 9 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Persons Voluntarily Acquiring Citizenship of a Foreign State Not to Be Citizens' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: No person shall be a citizen of India by virtue of article 5, or be deemed to be a citizen of India by virtue of article 6 or article 8, if he has vol.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 9

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 9 ('स्वेच्छा से किसी विदेशी राज्य की नागरिकता प्राप्त करने वाले व्यक्तियों को नागरिक नहीं बनना') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 9 भारत के संविधान में 'स्वेच्छा से किसी विदेशी राज्य की नागरिकता प्राप्त करने वाले व्यक्तियों को नागरिक नहीं बनना' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: No person shall be a citizen of India by virtue of article 5, or be deemed to be a citizen of India by virtue of article 6 or article 8, if he has vol...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 9

Input:
Premise: No person shall be a citizen of India by virtue of article 5, or be deemed to be a citizen of India by virtue of article 6 or article 8, if he has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of any foreign State.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Persons Voluntarily Acquiring Citizenship of a Foreign State Not to Be Citizens' under Article 9.

Output: Entailment


Article 9

Input:
आधार (Premise): No person shall be a citizen of India by virtue of article 5, or be deemed to be a citizen of India by virtue of article 6 or article 8, if he has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of any foreign State.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 9 के तहत 'स्वेच्छा से किसी विदेशी राज्य की नागरिकता प्राप्त करने वाले व्यक्तियों को नागरिक नहीं बनना' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 9

Input:
Premise: No person shall be a citizen of India by virtue of article 5, or be deemed to be a citizen of India by virtue of article 6 or article 8, if he has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of any foreign State.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Persons Voluntarily Acquiring Citizenship of a Foreign State Not to Be Citizens'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 9

Input:
आधार (Premise): No person shall be a citizen of India by virtue of article 5, or be deemed to be a citizen of India by virtue of article 6 or article 8, if he has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of any foreign State.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'स्वेच्छा से किसी विदेशी राज्य की नागरिकता प्राप्त करने वाले व्यक्तियों को नागरिक नहीं बनना' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 9

Input:
Premise: No person shall be a citizen of India by virtue of article 5, or be deemed to be a citizen of India by virtue of article 6 or article 8, if he has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of any foreign State.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 9

Input:
आधार (Premise): No person shall be a citizen of India by virtue of article 5, or be deemed to be a citizen of India by virtue of article 6 or article 8, if he has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of any foreign State.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 10

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Continuance of the Rights of Citizenship'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 10.

Explanation: Article 10 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Continuance of the Rights of Citizenship' under the Constitution of India.


Article 10

नागरिकता के अधिकारों की निरंतरता

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'नागरिकता के अधिकारों की निरंतरता' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 10 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 10 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'नागरिकता के अधिकारों की निरंतरता' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 10

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 10 (Continuance of the Rights of Citizenship).

Output: Article Article 10 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Continuance of the Rights of Citizenship' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Every person who is or is deemed to be a citizen of India under any of the foregoing provisions of this Part shall, subject to the provisions of any l.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 10

नागरिकता के अधिकारों की निरंतरता

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 10 ('नागरिकता के अधिकारों की निरंतरता') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 10 भारत के संविधान में 'नागरिकता के अधिकारों की निरंतरता' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Every person who is or is deemed to be a citizen of India under any of the foregoing provisions of this Part shall, subject to the provisions of any l...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 10

Input:
Premise: Every person who is or is deemed to be a citizen of India under any of the foregoing provisions of this Part shall, subject to the provisions of any law that may be made by Parliament, continue to be such citizen.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Continuance of the Rights of Citizenship' under Article 10.

Output: Entailment


Article 10

नागरिकता के अधिकारों की निरंतरता

Input:
आधार (Premise): Every person who is or is deemed to be a citizen of India under any of the foregoing provisions of this Part shall, subject to the provisions of any law that may be made by Parliament, continue to be such citizen.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 10 के तहत 'नागरिकता के अधिकारों की निरंतरता' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 10

Input:
Premise: Every person who is or is deemed to be a citizen of India under any of the foregoing provisions of this Part shall, subject to the provisions of any law that may be made by Parliament, continue to be such citizen.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Continuance of the Rights of Citizenship'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 10

नागरिकता के अधिकारों की निरंतरता

Input:
आधार (Premise): Every person who is or is deemed to be a citizen of India under any of the foregoing provisions of this Part shall, subject to the provisions of any law that may be made by Parliament, continue to be such citizen.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'नागरिकता के अधिकारों की निरंतरता' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 10

Input:
Premise: Every person who is or is deemed to be a citizen of India under any of the foregoing provisions of this Part shall, subject to the provisions of any law that may be made by Parliament, continue to be such citizen.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 10

नागरिकता के अधिकारों की निरंतरता

Input:
आधार (Premise): Every person who is or is deemed to be a citizen of India under any of the foregoing provisions of this Part shall, subject to the provisions of any law that may be made by Parliament, continue to be such citizen.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 11

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Parliament to Regulate the Right of Citizenship by Law'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 11.

Explanation: Article 11 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Parliament to Regulate the Right of Citizenship by Law' under the Constitution of India.


Article 11

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'संसद नागरिकता के अधिकार को कानून द्वारा विनियमित करेगी' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 11 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 11 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'संसद नागरिकता के अधिकार को कानून द्वारा विनियमित करेगी' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 11

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 11 (Parliament to Regulate the Right of Citizenship by Law).

Output: Article Article 11 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Parliament to Regulate the Right of Citizenship by Law' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this Part shall derogate from the power of Parliament to make any provision with respect to the acquisition and.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 11

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 11 ('संसद नागरिकता के अधिकार को कानून द्वारा विनियमित करेगी') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 11 भारत के संविधान में 'संसद नागरिकता के अधिकार को कानून द्वारा विनियमित करेगी' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this Part shall derogate from the power of Parliament to make any provision with respect to the acquisition and...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 11

Input:
Premise: Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this Part shall derogate from the power of Parliament to make any provision with respect to the acquisition and termination of citizenship and all other matters relating to citizenship

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Parliament to Regulate the Right of Citizenship by Law' under Article 11.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 11

Input:
आधार (Premise): Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this Part shall derogate from the power of Parliament to make any provision with respect to the acquisition and termination of citizenship and all other matters relating to citizenship

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 11 के तहत 'संसद नागरिकता के अधिकार को कानून द्वारा विनियमित करेगी' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 11

Input:
Premise: Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this Part shall derogate from the power of Parliament to make any provision with respect to the acquisition and termination of citizenship and all other matters relating to citizenship

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Parliament to Regulate the Right of Citizenship by Law'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 11

Input:
आधार (Premise): Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this Part shall derogate from the power of Parliament to make any provision with respect to the acquisition and termination of citizenship and all other matters relating to citizenship

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'संसद नागरिकता के अधिकार को कानून द्वारा विनियमित करेगी' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 11

Input:
Premise: Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this Part shall derogate from the power of Parliament to make any provision with respect to the acquisition and termination of citizenship and all other matters relating to citizenship

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 11

Input:
आधार (Premise): Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this Part shall derogate from the power of Parliament to make any provision with respect to the acquisition and termination of citizenship and all other matters relating to citizenship

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 14

Equality Before Law

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 14 (Equality Before Law).

Output: Article Article 14 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Equality Before Law' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.. This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 14

कानून के समक्ष समानता

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 14 ('कानून के समक्ष समानता') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 14 भारत के संविधान में 'कानून के समक्ष समानता' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 14

Equality Before Law

Input:
Premise: The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Equality Before Law' under Article 14.

Output: Entailment


Article 14

कानून के समक्ष समानता

Input:
आधार (Premise): The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 14 के तहत 'कानून के समक्ष समानता' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 14

Equality Before Law

Input:
Premise: The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Equality Before Law'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 14

कानून के समक्ष समानता

Input:
आधार (Premise): The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'कानून के समक्ष समानता' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 14

Equality Before Law

Input:
Premise: The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 14

कानून के समक्ष समानता

Input:
आधार (Premise): The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 17

Abolition of Untouchability

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 17 (Abolition of Untouchability).

Output: Article Article 17 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Abolition of Untouchability' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: “Untouchability” is abolished and its practice in any form is forbidden. The enforcement of any disability arising out of “Untouchability” shall be an.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 17

अस्पृश्यता उन्मूलन

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 17 ('अस्पृश्यता उन्मूलन') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 17 भारत के संविधान में 'अस्पृश्यता उन्मूलन' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: “Untouchability” is abolished and its practice in any form is forbidden. The enforcement of any disability arising out of “Untouchability” shall be an...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 17

Abolition of Untouchability

Input:
Premise: “Untouchability” is abolished and its practice in any form is forbidden. The enforcement of any disability arising out of “Untouchability” shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Abolition of Untouchability' under Article 17.

Output: Entailment


Article 17

अस्पृश्यता उन्मूलन

Input:
आधार (Premise): “Untouchability” is abolished and its practice in any form is forbidden. The enforcement of any disability arising out of “Untouchability” shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 17 के तहत 'अस्पृश्यता उन्मूलन' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 17

Abolition of Untouchability

Input:
Premise: “Untouchability” is abolished and its practice in any form is forbidden. The enforcement of any disability arising out of “Untouchability” shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Abolition of Untouchability'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 17

अस्पृश्यता उन्मूलन

Input:
आधार (Premise): “Untouchability” is abolished and its practice in any form is forbidden. The enforcement of any disability arising out of “Untouchability” shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'अस्पृश्यता उन्मूलन' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 17

Abolition of Untouchability

Input:
Premise: “Untouchability” is abolished and its practice in any form is forbidden. The enforcement of any disability arising out of “Untouchability” shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 17

अस्पृश्यता उन्मूलन

Input:
आधार (Premise): “Untouchability” is abolished and its practice in any form is forbidden. The enforcement of any disability arising out of “Untouchability” shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 18

Abolition of Titles

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Abolition of Titles'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 18.

Explanation: Article 18 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Abolition of Titles' under the Constitution of India.


Article 18

उपाधियों का उन्मूलन

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'उपाधियों का उन्मूलन' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 18 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 18 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'उपाधियों का उन्मूलन' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 18

Abolition of Titles

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 18 (Abolition of Titles).

Output:
Article Article 18 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Abolition of Titles' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) No title, not being a military or academic distinction, shall be conferred by the State.
(2) No citizen of India shall accept any title from any f.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 18

उपाधियों का उन्मूलन

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 18 ('उपाधियों का उन्मूलन') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 18 भारत के संविधान में 'उपाधियों का उन्मूलन' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) No title, not being a military or academic distinction, shall be conferred by the State.
(2) No citizen of India shall accept any title from any f...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 18

Abolition of Titles

Input:
Premise: (1) No title, not being a military or academic distinction, shall be conferred by the State.
(2) No citizen of India shall accept any title from any foreign State.
(3) No person who is not a citizen of India shall, while he holds any office of profit or trust under the State, accept without the consent of the President any title from any foreign State.
(4) No person holding any office of profit or trust under the State shall, without the consent of the President, accept any present, emolument, or office of any kind from or under any foreign State.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Abolition of Titles' under Article 18.

Output: Entailment


Article 18

उपाधियों का उन्मूलन

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) No title, not being a military or academic distinction, shall be conferred by the State.
(2) No citizen of India shall accept any title from any foreign State.
(3) No person who is not a citizen of India shall, while he holds any office of profit or trust under the State, accept without the consent of the President any title from any foreign State.
(4) No person holding any office of profit or trust under the State shall, without the consent of the President, accept any present, emolument, or office of any kind from or under any foreign State.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 18 के तहत 'उपाधियों का उन्मूलन' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 18

Abolition of Titles

Input:
Premise: (1) No title, not being a military or academic distinction, shall be conferred by the State.
(2) No citizen of India shall accept any title from any foreign State.
(3) No person who is not a citizen of India shall, while he holds any office of profit or trust under the State, accept without the consent of the President any title from any foreign State.
(4) No person holding any office of profit or trust under the State shall, without the consent of the President, accept any present, emolument, or office of any kind from or under any foreign State.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Abolition of Titles'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 18

उपाधियों का उन्मूलन

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) No title, not being a military or academic distinction, shall be conferred by the State.
(2) No citizen of India shall accept any title from any foreign State.
(3) No person who is not a citizen of India shall, while he holds any office of profit or trust under the State, accept without the consent of the President any title from any foreign State.
(4) No person holding any office of profit or trust under the State shall, without the consent of the President, accept any present, emolument, or office of any kind from or under any foreign State.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'उपाधियों का उन्मूलन' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 18

Abolition of Titles

Input:
Premise: (1) No title, not being a military or academic distinction, shall be conferred by the State.
(2) No citizen of India shall accept any title from any foreign State.
(3) No person who is not a citizen of India shall, while he holds any office of profit or trust under the State, accept without the consent of the President any title from any foreign State.
(4) No person holding any office of profit or trust under the State shall, without the consent of the President, accept any present, emolument, or office of any kind from or under any foreign State.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 18

उपाधियों का उन्मूलन

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) No title, not being a military or academic distinction, shall be conferred by the State.
(2) No citizen of India shall accept any title from any foreign State.
(3) No person who is not a citizen of India shall, while he holds any office of profit or trust under the State, accept without the consent of the President any title from any foreign State.
(4) No person holding any office of profit or trust under the State shall, without the consent of the President, accept any present, emolument, or office of any kind from or under any foreign State.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 19

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 19 (Protection of Certain Rights Regarding Freedom of Speech, Etc).

Output:
Article Article 19 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Protection of Certain Rights Regarding Freedom of Speech, Etc' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) All citizens shall have the right—
(a) to freedom of speech and expression;
(b) to assemble peaceably and without arms;
(c) to form associations o.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 19

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 19 ('बोलने की स्वतंत्रता आदि के संबंध में कुछ अधिकारों का संरक्षण') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 19 भारत के संविधान में 'बोलने की स्वतंत्रता आदि के संबंध में कुछ अधिकारों का संरक्षण' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) All citizens shall have the right—
(a) to freedom of speech and expression;
(b) to assemble peaceably and without arms;
(c) to form associations o...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 19

Input:
Premise: (1) All citizens shall have the right—
(a) to freedom of speech and expression;
(b) to assemble peaceably and without arms;
(c) to form associations or unions;
(d) to move freely throughout the territory of India;
(e) to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India;
(g) to practise any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business.
(2) Nothing in sub-clause (a) of clause (1) shall affect the operation of any existing law, or prevent the State from making any law, in so far as such law imposes reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence.
(3) Nothing in sub-clause (b) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India or public order, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause.
(4) Nothing in sub-clause (c) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the sovereignty andintegrity of India or public order or morality, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause.
(5) Nothing in sub-clauses (d) and (e) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of any of the rights conferred by the said sub-clauses either in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled Tribe.
(6) Nothing in sub-clause (g) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the general public, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause, and, in particular, nothing in the said sub-clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it relates to, or prevent the State from making any law relating to,—
(i) the professional or technical qualifications necessary for practising any profession or carrying on any occupation, trade or business, or
(ii) the carrying on by the State, or by a corporation owned or controlled by the State, of any trade, business, industry or service, whether to the exclusion, complete or partial, of citizens or otherwise.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Protection of Certain Rights Regarding Freedom of Speech, Etc' under Article 19.

Output: Entailment


Article 19

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) All citizens shall have the right—
(a) to freedom of speech and expression;
(b) to assemble peaceably and without arms;
(c) to form associations or unions;
(d) to move freely throughout the territory of India;
(e) to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India;
(g) to practise any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business.
(2) Nothing in sub-clause (a) of clause (1) shall affect the operation of any existing law, or prevent the State from making any law, in so far as such law imposes reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence.
(3) Nothing in sub-clause (b) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India or public order, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause.
(4) Nothing in sub-clause (c) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the sovereignty andintegrity of India or public order or morality, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause.
(5) Nothing in sub-clauses (d) and (e) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of any of the rights conferred by the said sub-clauses either in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled Tribe.
(6) Nothing in sub-clause (g) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the general public, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause, and, in particular, nothing in the said sub-clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it relates to, or prevent the State from making any law relating to,—
(i) the professional or technical qualifications necessary for practising any profession or carrying on any occupation, trade or business, or
(ii) the carrying on by the State, or by a corporation owned or controlled by the State, of any trade, business, industry or service, whether to the exclusion, complete or partial, of citizens or otherwise.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 19 के तहत 'बोलने की स्वतंत्रता आदि के संबंध में कुछ अधिकारों का संरक्षण' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 19

Input:
Premise: (1) All citizens shall have the right—
(a) to freedom of speech and expression;
(b) to assemble peaceably and without arms;
(c) to form associations or unions;
(d) to move freely throughout the territory of India;
(e) to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India;
(g) to practise any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business.
(2) Nothing in sub-clause (a) of clause (1) shall affect the operation of any existing law, or prevent the State from making any law, in so far as such law imposes reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence.
(3) Nothing in sub-clause (b) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India or public order, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause.
(4) Nothing in sub-clause (c) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the sovereignty andintegrity of India or public order or morality, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause.
(5) Nothing in sub-clauses (d) and (e) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of any of the rights conferred by the said sub-clauses either in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled Tribe.
(6) Nothing in sub-clause (g) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the general public, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause, and, in particular, nothing in the said sub-clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it relates to, or prevent the State from making any law relating to,—
(i) the professional or technical qualifications necessary for practising any profession or carrying on any occupation, trade or business, or
(ii) the carrying on by the State, or by a corporation owned or controlled by the State, of any trade, business, industry or service, whether to the exclusion, complete or partial, of citizens or otherwise.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Protection of Certain Rights Regarding Freedom of Speech, Etc'.

Output: Contradiction