Article 31C

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 31C ('कुछ निदेशक सिद्धांतों को प्रभाव देने वाले कानूनों की बचत') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 31C भारत के संविधान में 'कुछ निदेशक सिद्धांतों को प्रभाव देने वाले कानूनों की बचत' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law giving effect to the policy of the State towards securing all or any of the principles laid d...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 31C

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law giving effect to the policy of the State towards securing all or any of the principles laid down in Part IV shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19 and no law containing a declaration that it is for giving effect to such policy shall be called in question in any court on the ground that it does not give effect to such policy:
Provided that where such law is made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Saving of Laws Giving Effect to Certain Directive Principles' under Article 31C.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 31C

Input:
आधार (Premise): Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law giving effect to the policy of the State towards securing all or any of the principles laid down in Part IV shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19 and no law containing a declaration that it is for giving effect to such policy shall be called in question in any court on the ground that it does not give effect to such policy:
Provided that where such law is made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 31C के तहत 'कुछ निदेशक सिद्धांतों को प्रभाव देने वाले कानूनों की बचत' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 31C

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law giving effect to the policy of the State towards securing all or any of the principles laid down in Part IV shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19 and no law containing a declaration that it is for giving effect to such policy shall be called in question in any court on the ground that it does not give effect to such policy:
Provided that where such law is made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Saving of Laws Giving Effect to Certain Directive Principles'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 31C

Input:
आधार (Premise): Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law giving effect to the policy of the State towards securing all or any of the principles laid down in Part IV shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19 and no law containing a declaration that it is for giving effect to such policy shall be called in question in any court on the ground that it does not give effect to such policy:
Provided that where such law is made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'कुछ निदेशक सिद्धांतों को प्रभाव देने वाले कानूनों की बचत' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 31C

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law giving effect to the policy of the State towards securing all or any of the principles laid down in Part IV shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19 and no law containing a declaration that it is for giving effect to such policy shall be called in question in any court on the ground that it does not give effect to such policy:
Provided that where such law is made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 31C

Input:
आधार (Premise): Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law giving effect to the policy of the State towards securing all or any of the principles laid down in Part IV shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19 and no law containing a declaration that it is for giving effect to such policy shall be called in question in any court on the ground that it does not give effect to such policy:
Provided that where such law is made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 34

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Restriction on Rights Conferred by This Part While Martial Law Is in Force in Any Area'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 34.

Explanation: Article 34 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Restriction on Rights Conferred by This Part While Martial Law Is in Force in Any Area' under the Constitution of India.


Article 34

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'किसी भी क्षेत्र में मार्शल लॉ लागू होने पर इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों पर प्रतिबंध' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 34 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 34 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'किसी भी क्षेत्र में मार्शल लॉ लागू होने पर इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों पर प्रतिबंध' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 34

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 34 (Restriction on Rights Conferred by This Part While Martial Law Is in Force in Any Area).

Output: Article Article 34 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Restriction on Rights Conferred by This Part While Martial Law Is in Force in Any Area' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this Part, Parliament may by law indemnify any person in the service of the Union or of a Stat.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 34

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 34 ('किसी भी क्षेत्र में मार्शल लॉ लागू होने पर इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों पर प्रतिबंध') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 34 भारत के संविधान में 'किसी भी क्षेत्र में मार्शल लॉ लागू होने पर इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों पर प्रतिबंध' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: इस भाग के पूर्वगामी प्रावधानों में किसी भी बात के बावजूद, संसद कानून द्वारा संघ या राज्य या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति की सेवा में किसी भी व्यक्ति को भारत के क...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 34

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this Part, Parliament may by law indemnify any person in the service of the Union or of a State or any other person in respect of any act done by him in connection with the maintenance or restoration of order in any area within the territory of India where martial law was in force or validate any sentence passed, punishment inflicted, forfeiture ordered or other act done under martial law in such area.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Restriction on Rights Conferred by This Part While Martial Law Is in Force in Any Area' under Article 34.

Output: Entailment


Article 34

Input:
आधार (Premise): इस भाग के पूर्वगामी प्रावधानों में किसी भी बात के बावजूद, संसद कानून द्वारा संघ या राज्य या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति की सेवा में किसी भी व्यक्ति को भारत के क्षेत्र के भीतर किसी भी क्षेत्र में व्यवस्था बनाए रखने या बहाल करने के संबंध में उसके द्वारा किए गए किसी भी कार्य के संबंध में क्षतिपूर्ति कर सकती है, जहां मार्शल लॉ लागू था या ऐसे क्षेत्र में मार्शल लॉ के तहत पारित किसी भी सजा, दी गई सजा, जब्ती के आदेश या किए गए अन्य कार्य को वैध कर सकती है।

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 34 के तहत 'किसी भी क्षेत्र में मार्शल लॉ लागू होने पर इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों पर प्रतिबंध' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 34

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this Part, Parliament may by law indemnify any person in the service of the Union or of a State or any other person in respect of any act done by him in connection with the maintenance or restoration of order in any area within the territory of India where martial law was in force or validate any sentence passed, punishment inflicted, forfeiture ordered or other act done under martial law in such area.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Restriction on Rights Conferred by This Part While Martial Law Is in Force in Any Area'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 34

Input:
आधार (Premise): इस भाग के पूर्वगामी प्रावधानों में किसी भी बात के बावजूद, संसद कानून द्वारा संघ या राज्य या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति की सेवा में किसी भी व्यक्ति को भारत के क्षेत्र के भीतर किसी भी क्षेत्र में व्यवस्था बनाए रखने या बहाल करने के संबंध में उसके द्वारा किए गए किसी भी कार्य के संबंध में क्षतिपूर्ति कर सकती है, जहां मार्शल लॉ लागू था या ऐसे क्षेत्र में मार्शल लॉ के तहत पारित किसी भी सजा, दी गई सजा, जब्ती के आदेश या किए गए अन्य कार्य को वैध कर सकती है।

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'किसी भी क्षेत्र में मार्शल लॉ लागू होने पर इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों पर प्रतिबंध' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 34

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this Part, Parliament may by law indemnify any person in the service of the Union or of a State or any other person in respect of any act done by him in connection with the maintenance or restoration of order in any area within the territory of India where martial law was in force or validate any sentence passed, punishment inflicted, forfeiture ordered or other act done under martial law in such area.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 34

Input:
आधार (Premise): इस भाग के पूर्वगामी प्रावधानों में किसी भी बात के बावजूद, संसद कानून द्वारा संघ या राज्य या किसी अन्य व्यक्ति की सेवा में किसी भी व्यक्ति को भारत के क्षेत्र के भीतर किसी भी क्षेत्र में व्यवस्था बनाए रखने या बहाल करने के संबंध में उसके द्वारा किए गए किसी भी कार्य के संबंध में क्षतिपूर्ति कर सकती है, जहां मार्शल लॉ लागू था या ऐसे क्षेत्र में मार्शल लॉ के तहत पारित किसी भी सजा, दी गई सजा, जब्ती के आदेश या किए गए अन्य कार्य को वैध कर सकती है।

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 42

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Provision for Just and Humane Conditions of Work and Maternity Relief'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 42.

Explanation: Article 42 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Provision for Just and Humane Conditions of Work and Maternity Relief' under the Constitution of India.


Article 42

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'काम की न्यायसंगत और मानवीय स्थितियों और मातृत्व राहत के लिए प्रावधान' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 42 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 42 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'काम की न्यायसंगत और मानवीय स्थितियों और मातृत्व राहत के लिए प्रावधान' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 42

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 42 (Provision for Just and Humane Conditions of Work and Maternity Relief).

Output: Article Article 42 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Provision for Just and Humane Conditions of Work and Maternity Relief' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: The State shall make provision for securing just and humane conditions of work and for maternity relief.. This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 42

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 42 ('काम की न्यायसंगत और मानवीय स्थितियों और मातृत्व राहत के लिए प्रावधान') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 42 भारत के संविधान में 'काम की न्यायसंगत और मानवीय स्थितियों और मातृत्व राहत के लिए प्रावधान' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: राज्य काम की उचित और मानवीय स्थितियाँ सुनिश्चित करने और मातृत्व राहत के लिए प्रावधान करेगा।। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 42

Input:
Premise: The State shall make provision for securing just and humane conditions of work and for maternity relief.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Provision for Just and Humane Conditions of Work and Maternity Relief' under Article 42.

Output: Entailment


Article 42

Input:
आधार (Premise): राज्य काम की उचित और मानवीय स्थितियाँ सुनिश्चित करने और मातृत्व राहत के लिए प्रावधान करेगा।

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 42 के तहत 'काम की न्यायसंगत और मानवीय स्थितियों और मातृत्व राहत के लिए प्रावधान' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 42

Input:
Premise: The State shall make provision for securing just and humane conditions of work and for maternity relief.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Provision for Just and Humane Conditions of Work and Maternity Relief'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 42

Input:
आधार (Premise): राज्य काम की उचित और मानवीय स्थितियाँ सुनिश्चित करने और मातृत्व राहत के लिए प्रावधान करेगा।

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'काम की न्यायसंगत और मानवीय स्थितियों और मातृत्व राहत के लिए प्रावधान' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 42

Input:
Premise: The State shall make provision for securing just and humane conditions of work and for maternity relief.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 42

Input:
आधार (Premise): राज्य काम की उचित और मानवीय स्थितियाँ सुनिश्चित करने और मातृत्व राहत के लिए प्रावधान करेगा।

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 43A

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Participation of Workers in Management of Industries'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 43A.

Explanation: Article 43A specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Participation of Workers in Management of Industries' under the Constitution of India.


Article 43A

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'उद्योगों के प्रबंधन में श्रमिकों की भागीदारी' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 43A की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 43A विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'उद्योगों के प्रबंधन में श्रमिकों की भागीदारी' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 43A

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 43A (Participation of Workers in Management of Industries).

Output: Article Article 43A establishes the fundamental framework for 'Participation of Workers in Management of Industries' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: The State shall take steps, by suitable legislation or in any other way, to secure the participation of workers in the management of undertakings, est.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 43A

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 43A ('उद्योगों के प्रबंधन में श्रमिकों की भागीदारी') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 43A भारत के संविधान में 'उद्योगों के प्रबंधन में श्रमिकों की भागीदारी' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: राज्य किसी भी उद्योग में लगे उपक्रमों, प्रतिष्ठानों या अन्य संगठनों के प्रबंधन में श्रमिकों की भागीदारी सुनिश्चित करने के लिए उपयुक्त कानून या किसी अन...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 43A

Input:
Premise: The State shall take steps, by suitable legislation or in any other way, to secure the participation of workers in the management of undertakings, establishments or other organisations engaged in any industry.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Participation of Workers in Management of Industries' under Article 43A.

Output: Entailment


Article 43A

Input:
आधार (Premise): राज्य किसी भी उद्योग में लगे उपक्रमों, प्रतिष्ठानों या अन्य संगठनों के प्रबंधन में श्रमिकों की भागीदारी सुनिश्चित करने के लिए उपयुक्त कानून या किसी अन्य तरीके से कदम उठाएगा।

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 43A के तहत 'उद्योगों के प्रबंधन में श्रमिकों की भागीदारी' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 43A

Input:
Premise: The State shall take steps, by suitable legislation or in any other way, to secure the participation of workers in the management of undertakings, establishments or other organisations engaged in any industry.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Participation of Workers in Management of Industries'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 43A

Input:
आधार (Premise): राज्य किसी भी उद्योग में लगे उपक्रमों, प्रतिष्ठानों या अन्य संगठनों के प्रबंधन में श्रमिकों की भागीदारी सुनिश्चित करने के लिए उपयुक्त कानून या किसी अन्य तरीके से कदम उठाएगा।

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'उद्योगों के प्रबंधन में श्रमिकों की भागीदारी' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 43A

Input:
Premise: The State shall take steps, by suitable legislation or in any other way, to secure the participation of workers in the management of undertakings, establishments or other organisations engaged in any industry.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 43A

Input:
आधार (Premise): राज्य किसी भी उद्योग में लगे उपक्रमों, प्रतिष्ठानों या अन्य संगठनों के प्रबंधन में श्रमिकों की भागीदारी सुनिश्चित करने के लिए उपयुक्त कानून या किसी अन्य तरीके से कदम उठाएगा।

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 53

Executive Power of the Union

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Executive Power of the Union'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 53.

Explanation: Article 53 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Executive Power of the Union' under the Constitution of India.


Article 53

संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 53 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 53 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 53

Executive Power of the Union

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 53 (Executive Power of the Union).

Output: Article Article 53 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Executive Power of the Union' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) The executive power of the Union shall be vested in the President and shall be exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 53

संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 53 ('संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 53 भारत के संविधान में 'संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) The executive power of the Union shall be vested in the President and shall be exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 53

Executive Power of the Union

Input:
Premise: (1) The executive power of the Union shall be vested in the President and shall be exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with this Constitution.
(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provision, the supreme command of the Defence Forces of the Union shall be vested in the President and the exercise thereof shall be regulated by law.
(3) Nothing in this article shall—
(a) be deemed to transfer to the President any functions conferred by any existing law on the Government of any State or other authority; or
(b) prevent Parliament from conferring by law functions on authorities other than the President.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Executive Power of the Union' under Article 53.

Output: Entailment


Article 53

संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The executive power of the Union shall be vested in the President and shall be exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with this Constitution.
(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provision, the supreme command of the Defence Forces of the Union shall be vested in the President and the exercise thereof shall be regulated by law.
(3) Nothing in this article shall—
(a) be deemed to transfer to the President any functions conferred by any existing law on the Government of any State or other authority; or
(b) prevent Parliament from conferring by law functions on authorities other than the President.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 53 के तहत 'संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 53

Executive Power of the Union

Input:
Premise: (1) The executive power of the Union shall be vested in the President and shall be exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with this Constitution.
(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provision, the supreme command of the Defence Forces of the Union shall be vested in the President and the exercise thereof shall be regulated by law.
(3) Nothing in this article shall—
(a) be deemed to transfer to the President any functions conferred by any existing law on the Government of any State or other authority; or
(b) prevent Parliament from conferring by law functions on authorities other than the President.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Executive Power of the Union'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 53

संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The executive power of the Union shall be vested in the President and shall be exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with this Constitution.
(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provision, the supreme command of the Defence Forces of the Union shall be vested in the President and the exercise thereof shall be regulated by law.
(3) Nothing in this article shall—
(a) be deemed to transfer to the President any functions conferred by any existing law on the Government of any State or other authority; or
(b) prevent Parliament from conferring by law functions on authorities other than the President.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 53

Executive Power of the Union

Input:
Premise: (1) The executive power of the Union shall be vested in the President and shall be exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with this Constitution.
(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provision, the supreme command of the Defence Forces of the Union shall be vested in the President and the exercise thereof shall be regulated by law.
(3) Nothing in this article shall—
(a) be deemed to transfer to the President any functions conferred by any existing law on the Government of any State or other authority; or
(b) prevent Parliament from conferring by law functions on authorities other than the President.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 53

संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The executive power of the Union shall be vested in the President and shall be exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to him in accordance with this Constitution.
(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provision, the supreme command of the Defence Forces of the Union shall be vested in the President and the exercise thereof shall be regulated by law.
(3) Nothing in this article shall—
(a) be deemed to transfer to the President any functions conferred by any existing law on the Government of any State or other authority; or
(b) prevent Parliament from conferring by law functions on authorities other than the President.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 73

Extent of Executive Power of the Union

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Extent of Executive Power of the Union'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 73.

Explanation: Article 73 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Extent of Executive Power of the Union' under the Constitution of India.


Article 73

संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति का विस्तार

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति का विस्तार' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 73 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 73 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति का विस्तार' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 73

Extent of Executive Power of the Union

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 73 (Extent of Executive Power of the Union).

Output:
Article Article 73 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Extent of Executive Power of the Union' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the executive power of the Union shall extend —
(a) to the matters with respect to which Parliamen.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 73

संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति का विस्तार

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 73 ('संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति का विस्तार') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 73 भारत के संविधान में 'संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति का विस्तार' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the executive power of the Union shall extend —
(a) to the matters with respect to which Parliamen...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 73

Extent of Executive Power of the Union

Input:
Premise: (1) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the executive power of the Union shall extend —
(a) to the matters with respect to which Parliament has power to make laws; and
(b) to the exercise of such rights, authority and jurisdiction as are exercisable by the Government of India by virtue of any treaty or agreement:
Provided that the executive power referred to in subclause (a) shall not, save as expressly provided in this Constitution or in any law made by Parliament, extend in any State to matters with respect to which the Legislature of the State has also power to make laws.
(2) Until otherwise provided by Parliament, a State and any officer or authority of a State may, notwithstanding anything in this article, continue to exercise in matters with respect to which Parliament has power to make laws for that State such executive power or functions as the State or officer or authority thereof could exercise immediately before the commencement of this Constitution.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Extent of Executive Power of the Union' under Article 73.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 73

संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति का विस्तार

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the executive power of the Union shall extend —
(a) to the matters with respect to which Parliament has power to make laws; and
(b) to the exercise of such rights, authority and jurisdiction as are exercisable by the Government of India by virtue of any treaty or agreement:
Provided that the executive power referred to in subclause (a) shall not, save as expressly provided in this Constitution or in any law made by Parliament, extend in any State to matters with respect to which the Legislature of the State has also power to make laws.
(2) Until otherwise provided by Parliament, a State and any officer or authority of a State may, notwithstanding anything in this article, continue to exercise in matters with respect to which Parliament has power to make laws for that State such executive power or functions as the State or officer or authority thereof could exercise immediately before the commencement of this Constitution.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 73 के तहत 'संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति का विस्तार' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 73

Extent of Executive Power of the Union

Input:
Premise: (1) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the executive power of the Union shall extend —
(a) to the matters with respect to which Parliament has power to make laws; and
(b) to the exercise of such rights, authority and jurisdiction as are exercisable by the Government of India by virtue of any treaty or agreement:
Provided that the executive power referred to in subclause (a) shall not, save as expressly provided in this Constitution or in any law made by Parliament, extend in any State to matters with respect to which the Legislature of the State has also power to make laws.
(2) Until otherwise provided by Parliament, a State and any officer or authority of a State may, notwithstanding anything in this article, continue to exercise in matters with respect to which Parliament has power to make laws for that State such executive power or functions as the State or officer or authority thereof could exercise immediately before the commencement of this Constitution.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Extent of Executive Power of the Union'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 73

संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति का विस्तार

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the executive power of the Union shall extend —
(a) to the matters with respect to which Parliament has power to make laws; and
(b) to the exercise of such rights, authority and jurisdiction as are exercisable by the Government of India by virtue of any treaty or agreement:
Provided that the executive power referred to in subclause (a) shall not, save as expressly provided in this Constitution or in any law made by Parliament, extend in any State to matters with respect to which the Legislature of the State has also power to make laws.
(2) Until otherwise provided by Parliament, a State and any officer or authority of a State may, notwithstanding anything in this article, continue to exercise in matters with respect to which Parliament has power to make laws for that State such executive power or functions as the State or officer or authority thereof could exercise immediately before the commencement of this Constitution.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति का विस्तार' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 73

Extent of Executive Power of the Union

Input:
Premise: (1) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the executive power of the Union shall extend —
(a) to the matters with respect to which Parliament has power to make laws; and
(b) to the exercise of such rights, authority and jurisdiction as are exercisable by the Government of India by virtue of any treaty or agreement:
Provided that the executive power referred to in subclause (a) shall not, save as expressly provided in this Constitution or in any law made by Parliament, extend in any State to matters with respect to which the Legislature of the State has also power to make laws.
(2) Until otherwise provided by Parliament, a State and any officer or authority of a State may, notwithstanding anything in this article, continue to exercise in matters with respect to which Parliament has power to make laws for that State such executive power or functions as the State or officer or authority thereof could exercise immediately before the commencement of this Constitution.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 73

संघ की कार्यकारी शक्ति का विस्तार

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the executive power of the Union shall extend —
(a) to the matters with respect to which Parliament has power to make laws; and
(b) to the exercise of such rights, authority and jurisdiction as are exercisable by the Government of India by virtue of any treaty or agreement:
Provided that the executive power referred to in subclause (a) shall not, save as expressly provided in this Constitution or in any law made by Parliament, extend in any State to matters with respect to which the Legislature of the State has also power to make laws.
(2) Until otherwise provided by Parliament, a State and any officer or authority of a State may, notwithstanding anything in this article, continue to exercise in matters with respect to which Parliament has power to make laws for that State such executive power or functions as the State or officer or authority thereof could exercise immediately before the commencement of this Constitution.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 88

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Rights of Ministers and Attorney General as Respects Houses'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 88.

Explanation: Article 88 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Rights of Ministers and Attorney General as Respects Houses' under the Constitution of India.


Article 88

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'सदनों का सम्मान करने वाले मंत्रियों और महान्यायवादी के अधिकार' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 88 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 88 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'सदनों का सम्मान करने वाले मंत्रियों और महान्यायवादी के अधिकार' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 88

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 88 (Rights of Ministers and Attorney General as Respects Houses).

Output: Article Article 88 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Rights of Ministers and Attorney General as Respects Houses' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Every Minister and the Attorney-General of India shall have the right to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of, either House, any.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 88

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 88 ('सदनों का सम्मान करने वाले मंत्रियों और महान्यायवादी के अधिकार') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 88 भारत के संविधान में 'सदनों का सम्मान करने वाले मंत्रियों और महान्यायवादी के अधिकार' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Every Minister and the Attorney-General of India shall have the right to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of, either House, any...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 88

Input:
Premise: Every Minister and the Attorney-General of India shall have the right to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of, either House, any joint sitting of the Houses, and any committee of Parliament of which he may be named a member, but shall not by virtue of this article be entitled to vote.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Rights of Ministers and Attorney General as Respects Houses' under Article 88.

Output: Entailment


Article 88

Input:
आधार (Premise): Every Minister and the Attorney-General of India shall have the right to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of, either House, any joint sitting of the Houses, and any committee of Parliament of which he may be named a member, but shall not by virtue of this article be entitled to vote.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 88 के तहत 'सदनों का सम्मान करने वाले मंत्रियों और महान्यायवादी के अधिकार' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 88

Input:
Premise: Every Minister and the Attorney-General of India shall have the right to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of, either House, any joint sitting of the Houses, and any committee of Parliament of which he may be named a member, but shall not by virtue of this article be entitled to vote.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Rights of Ministers and Attorney General as Respects Houses'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 88

Input:
आधार (Premise): Every Minister and the Attorney-General of India shall have the right to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of, either House, any joint sitting of the Houses, and any committee of Parliament of which he may be named a member, but shall not by virtue of this article be entitled to vote.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'सदनों का सम्मान करने वाले मंत्रियों और महान्यायवादी के अधिकार' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 88

Input:
Premise: Every Minister and the Attorney-General of India shall have the right to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of, either House, any joint sitting of the Houses, and any committee of Parliament of which he may be named a member, but shall not by virtue of this article be entitled to vote.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 88

Input:
आधार (Premise): Every Minister and the Attorney-General of India shall have the right to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of, either House, any joint sitting of the Houses, and any committee of Parliament of which he may be named a member, but shall not by virtue of this article be entitled to vote.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 97

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Salaries and Allowances of the Chairman and Deputy Chairman and the Speaker and Deputy Speaker'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 97.

Explanation: Article 97 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Salaries and Allowances of the Chairman and Deputy Chairman and the Speaker and Deputy Speaker' under the Constitution of India.


Article 97

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'सभापति और उपसभापति तथा सभापति और उपसभापति के वेतन और भत्ते' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 97 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 97 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'सभापति और उपसभापति तथा सभापति और उपसभापति के वेतन और भत्ते' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 97

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 97 (Salaries and Allowances of the Chairman and Deputy Chairman and the Speaker and Deputy Speaker).

Output: Article Article 97 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Salaries and Allowances of the Chairman and Deputy Chairman and the Speaker and Deputy Speaker' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: There shall be paid to the Chairman and the Deputy Chairman of the Council of States, and to the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker of the House of the Pe.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 97

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 97 ('सभापति और उपसभापति तथा सभापति और उपसभापति के वेतन और भत्ते') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 97 भारत के संविधान में 'सभापति और उपसभापति तथा सभापति और उपसभापति के वेतन और भत्ते' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: There shall be paid to the Chairman and the Deputy Chairman of the Council of States, and to the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker of the House of the Pe...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 97

Input:
Premise: There shall be paid to the Chairman and the Deputy Chairman of the Council of States, and to the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker of the House of the People, such salaries and allowances as may be respectively fixed by Parliament by law and, until provision in that behalf is so made, such salaries and allowances as are specified in the Second Schedule.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Salaries and Allowances of the Chairman and Deputy Chairman and the Speaker and Deputy Speaker' under Article 97.

Output: Entailment


Article 97

Input:
आधार (Premise): There shall be paid to the Chairman and the Deputy Chairman of the Council of States, and to the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker of the House of the People, such salaries and allowances as may be respectively fixed by Parliament by law and, until provision in that behalf is so made, such salaries and allowances as are specified in the Second Schedule.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 97 के तहत 'सभापति और उपसभापति तथा सभापति और उपसभापति के वेतन और भत्ते' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 97

Input:
Premise: There shall be paid to the Chairman and the Deputy Chairman of the Council of States, and to the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker of the House of the People, such salaries and allowances as may be respectively fixed by Parliament by law and, until provision in that behalf is so made, such salaries and allowances as are specified in the Second Schedule.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Salaries and Allowances of the Chairman and Deputy Chairman and the Speaker and Deputy Speaker'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 97

Input:
आधार (Premise): There shall be paid to the Chairman and the Deputy Chairman of the Council of States, and to the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker of the House of the People, such salaries and allowances as may be respectively fixed by Parliament by law and, until provision in that behalf is so made, such salaries and allowances as are specified in the Second Schedule.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'सभापति और उपसभापति तथा सभापति और उपसभापति के वेतन और भत्ते' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 97

Input:
Premise: There shall be paid to the Chairman and the Deputy Chairman of the Council of States, and to the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker of the House of the People, such salaries and allowances as may be respectively fixed by Parliament by law and, until provision in that behalf is so made, such salaries and allowances as are specified in the Second Schedule.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 97

Input:
आधार (Premise): There shall be paid to the Chairman and the Deputy Chairman of the Council of States, and to the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker of the House of the People, such salaries and allowances as may be respectively fixed by Parliament by law and, until provision in that behalf is so made, such salaries and allowances as are specified in the Second Schedule.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 106

Salaries and Allowances of Members

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Salaries and Allowances of Members'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 106.

Explanation: Article 106 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Salaries and Allowances of Members' under the Constitution of India.


Article 106

सदस्यों के वेतन एवं भत्ते

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'सदस्यों के वेतन एवं भत्ते' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 106 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 106 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'सदस्यों के वेतन एवं भत्ते' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 106

Salaries and Allowances of Members

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 106 (Salaries and Allowances of Members).

Output: Article Article 106 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Salaries and Allowances of Members' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Members of either House of Parliament shall be entitled to receive such salaries and allowances as may from time to time be determined by Parliament b.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 106

सदस्यों के वेतन एवं भत्ते

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 106 ('सदस्यों के वेतन एवं भत्ते') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 106 भारत के संविधान में 'सदस्यों के वेतन एवं भत्ते' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Members of either House of Parliament shall be entitled to receive such salaries and allowances as may from time to time be determined by Parliament b...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 106

Salaries and Allowances of Members

Input:
Premise: Members of either House of Parliament shall be entitled to receive such salaries and allowances as may from time to time be determined by Parliament by law and, until provision in that respect is so made, allowances at such rates and upon such conditions as were immediately before the commencement of this Constitution applicable in the case of members of the Constituent Assembly of the Dominion of India.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Salaries and Allowances of Members' under Article 106.

Output: Entailment


Article 106

सदस्यों के वेतन एवं भत्ते

Input:
आधार (Premise): Members of either House of Parliament shall be entitled to receive such salaries and allowances as may from time to time be determined by Parliament by law and, until provision in that respect is so made, allowances at such rates and upon such conditions as were immediately before the commencement of this Constitution applicable in the case of members of the Constituent Assembly of the Dominion of India.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 106 के तहत 'सदस्यों के वेतन एवं भत्ते' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 106

Salaries and Allowances of Members

Input:
Premise: Members of either House of Parliament shall be entitled to receive such salaries and allowances as may from time to time be determined by Parliament by law and, until provision in that respect is so made, allowances at such rates and upon such conditions as were immediately before the commencement of this Constitution applicable in the case of members of the Constituent Assembly of the Dominion of India.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Salaries and Allowances of Members'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 106

सदस्यों के वेतन एवं भत्ते

Input:
आधार (Premise): Members of either House of Parliament shall be entitled to receive such salaries and allowances as may from time to time be determined by Parliament by law and, until provision in that respect is so made, allowances at such rates and upon such conditions as were immediately before the commencement of this Constitution applicable in the case of members of the Constituent Assembly of the Dominion of India.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'सदस्यों के वेतन एवं भत्ते' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 106

Salaries and Allowances of Members

Input:
Premise: Members of either House of Parliament shall be entitled to receive such salaries and allowances as may from time to time be determined by Parliament by law and, until provision in that respect is so made, allowances at such rates and upon such conditions as were immediately before the commencement of this Constitution applicable in the case of members of the Constituent Assembly of the Dominion of India.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 106

सदस्यों के वेतन एवं भत्ते

Input:
आधार (Premise): Members of either House of Parliament shall be entitled to receive such salaries and allowances as may from time to time be determined by Parliament by law and, until provision in that respect is so made, allowances at such rates and upon such conditions as were immediately before the commencement of this Constitution applicable in the case of members of the Constituent Assembly of the Dominion of India.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 125

Salaries, Etc, of Judges

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Salaries, Etc, of Judges'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 125.

Explanation: Article 125 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Salaries, Etc, of Judges' under the Constitution of India.


Article 125

न्यायाधीशों का वेतन, आदि

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'न्यायाधीशों का वेतन, आदि' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 125 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 125 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'न्यायाधीशों का वेतन, आदि' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 125

Salaries, Etc, of Judges

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 125 (Salaries, Etc, of Judges).

Output: Article Article 125 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Salaries, Etc, of Judges' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) There shall be paid to the Judges of the Supreme Court such salaries as may be determined by Parliament by law and, until provision in that behalf.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 125

न्यायाधीशों का वेतन, आदि

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 125 ('न्यायाधीशों का वेतन, आदि') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 125 भारत के संविधान में 'न्यायाधीशों का वेतन, आदि' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) There shall be paid to the Judges of the Supreme Court such salaries as may be determined by Parliament by law and, until provision in that behalf...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 125

Salaries, Etc, of Judges

Input:
Premise: (1) There shall be paid to the Judges of the Supreme Court such salaries as may be determined by Parliament by law and, until provision in that behalf is so made, such salaries as are specified in the Second Schedule.
(2) Every Judge shall be entitled to such privileges and allowances and to such rights in respect of leave of absence and pension as may from time to time be determined by or under law made by Parliament and, until so determined, to such privileges, allowances and rights as are specified in the Second Schedule:
Provided that neither the privileges nor the allowances of a Judge nor his rights in respect of leave of absence or pension shall be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Salaries, Etc, of Judges' under Article 125.

Output: Entailment


Article 125

न्यायाधीशों का वेतन, आदि

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) There shall be paid to the Judges of the Supreme Court such salaries as may be determined by Parliament by law and, until provision in that behalf is so made, such salaries as are specified in the Second Schedule.
(2) Every Judge shall be entitled to such privileges and allowances and to such rights in respect of leave of absence and pension as may from time to time be determined by or under law made by Parliament and, until so determined, to such privileges, allowances and rights as are specified in the Second Schedule:
Provided that neither the privileges nor the allowances of a Judge nor his rights in respect of leave of absence or pension shall be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 125 के तहत 'न्यायाधीशों का वेतन, आदि' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 125

Salaries, Etc, of Judges

Input:
Premise: (1) There shall be paid to the Judges of the Supreme Court such salaries as may be determined by Parliament by law and, until provision in that behalf is so made, such salaries as are specified in the Second Schedule.
(2) Every Judge shall be entitled to such privileges and allowances and to such rights in respect of leave of absence and pension as may from time to time be determined by or under law made by Parliament and, until so determined, to such privileges, allowances and rights as are specified in the Second Schedule:
Provided that neither the privileges nor the allowances of a Judge nor his rights in respect of leave of absence or pension shall be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Salaries, Etc, of Judges'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 125

न्यायाधीशों का वेतन, आदि

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) There shall be paid to the Judges of the Supreme Court such salaries as may be determined by Parliament by law and, until provision in that behalf is so made, such salaries as are specified in the Second Schedule.
(2) Every Judge shall be entitled to such privileges and allowances and to such rights in respect of leave of absence and pension as may from time to time be determined by or under law made by Parliament and, until so determined, to such privileges, allowances and rights as are specified in the Second Schedule:
Provided that neither the privileges nor the allowances of a Judge nor his rights in respect of leave of absence or pension shall be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'न्यायाधीशों का वेतन, आदि' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 125

Salaries, Etc, of Judges

Input:
Premise: (1) There shall be paid to the Judges of the Supreme Court such salaries as may be determined by Parliament by law and, until provision in that behalf is so made, such salaries as are specified in the Second Schedule.
(2) Every Judge shall be entitled to such privileges and allowances and to such rights in respect of leave of absence and pension as may from time to time be determined by or under law made by Parliament and, until so determined, to such privileges, allowances and rights as are specified in the Second Schedule:
Provided that neither the privileges nor the allowances of a Judge nor his rights in respect of leave of absence or pension shall be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 125

न्यायाधीशों का वेतन, आदि

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) There shall be paid to the Judges of the Supreme Court such salaries as may be determined by Parliament by law and, until provision in that behalf is so made, such salaries as are specified in the Second Schedule.
(2) Every Judge shall be entitled to such privileges and allowances and to such rights in respect of leave of absence and pension as may from time to time be determined by or under law made by Parliament and, until so determined, to such privileges, allowances and rights as are specified in the Second Schedule:
Provided that neither the privileges nor the allowances of a Judge nor his rights in respect of leave of absence or pension shall be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 126

Appointment of Acting Chief Justice

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Appointment of Acting Chief Justice'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 126.

Explanation: Article 126 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Appointment of Acting Chief Justice' under the Constitution of India.


Article 126

कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 126 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 126 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 126

Appointment of Acting Chief Justice

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 126 (Appointment of Acting Chief Justice).

Output: Article Article 126 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Appointment of Acting Chief Justice' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: When the office of Chief Justice of India is vacant or when the Chief Justice is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the duties of h.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 126

कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 126 ('कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 126 भारत के संविधान में 'कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: When the office of Chief Justice of India is vacant or when the Chief Justice is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the duties of h...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 126

Appointment of Acting Chief Justice

Input:
Premise: When the office of Chief Justice of India is vacant or when the Chief Justice is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the duties of his office, the duties of the office shall be performed by such one of the other Judges of the Court as the President may appoint for the purpose.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Appointment of Acting Chief Justice' under Article 126.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 126

कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): When the office of Chief Justice of India is vacant or when the Chief Justice is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the duties of his office, the duties of the office shall be performed by such one of the other Judges of the Court as the President may appoint for the purpose.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 126 के तहत 'कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 126

Appointment of Acting Chief Justice

Input:
Premise: When the office of Chief Justice of India is vacant or when the Chief Justice is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the duties of his office, the duties of the office shall be performed by such one of the other Judges of the Court as the President may appoint for the purpose.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Appointment of Acting Chief Justice'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 126

कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): When the office of Chief Justice of India is vacant or when the Chief Justice is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the duties of his office, the duties of the office shall be performed by such one of the other Judges of the Court as the President may appoint for the purpose.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 126

Appointment of Acting Chief Justice

Input:
Premise: When the office of Chief Justice of India is vacant or when the Chief Justice is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the duties of his office, the duties of the office shall be performed by such one of the other Judges of the Court as the President may appoint for the purpose.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 126

कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): When the office of Chief Justice of India is vacant or when the Chief Justice is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the duties of his office, the duties of the office shall be performed by such one of the other Judges of the Court as the President may appoint for the purpose.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 137

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Review of Judgments or Orders by the Supreme Court'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 137.

Explanation: Article 137 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Review of Judgments or Orders by the Supreme Court' under the Constitution of India.


Article 137

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय द्वारा निर्णयों या आदेशों की समीक्षा' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 137 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 137 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय द्वारा निर्णयों या आदेशों की समीक्षा' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 137

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 137 (Review of Judgments or Orders by the Supreme Court).

Output: Article Article 137 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Review of Judgments or Orders by the Supreme Court' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Subject to the provisions of any law made by Parliament or any rules made under article 145, the Supreme Court shall have power to review any judgment.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 137

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 137 ('सर्वोच्च न्यायालय द्वारा निर्णयों या आदेशों की समीक्षा') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 137 भारत के संविधान में 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय द्वारा निर्णयों या आदेशों की समीक्षा' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Subject to the provisions of any law made by Parliament or any rules made under article 145, the Supreme Court shall have power to review any judgment...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 137

Input:
Premise: Subject to the provisions of any law made by Parliament or any rules made under article 145, the Supreme Court shall have power to review any judgment pronounced or order made by it.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Review of Judgments or Orders by the Supreme Court' under Article 137.

Output: Entailment


Article 137

Input:
आधार (Premise): Subject to the provisions of any law made by Parliament or any rules made under article 145, the Supreme Court shall have power to review any judgment pronounced or order made by it.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 137 के तहत 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय द्वारा निर्णयों या आदेशों की समीक्षा' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 137

Input:
Premise: Subject to the provisions of any law made by Parliament or any rules made under article 145, the Supreme Court shall have power to review any judgment pronounced or order made by it.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Review of Judgments or Orders by the Supreme Court'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 137

Input:
आधार (Premise): Subject to the provisions of any law made by Parliament or any rules made under article 145, the Supreme Court shall have power to review any judgment pronounced or order made by it.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय द्वारा निर्णयों या आदेशों की समीक्षा' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 137

Input:
Premise: Subject to the provisions of any law made by Parliament or any rules made under article 145, the Supreme Court shall have power to review any judgment pronounced or order made by it.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 137

Input:
आधार (Premise): Subject to the provisions of any law made by Parliament or any rules made under article 145, the Supreme Court shall have power to review any judgment pronounced or order made by it.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 139

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Conferment on the Supreme Court of Powers to Issue Certain Writs'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 139.

Explanation: Article 139 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Conferment on the Supreme Court of Powers to Issue Certain Writs' under the Constitution of India.


Article 139

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय को कुछ रिट जारी करने की शक्ति प्रदान करना' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 139 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 139 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय को कुछ रिट जारी करने की शक्ति प्रदान करना' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 139

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 139 (Conferment on the Supreme Court of Powers to Issue Certain Writs).

Output: Article Article 139 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Conferment on the Supreme Court of Powers to Issue Certain Writs' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Parliament may by law confer on the Supreme Court power to issue directions, orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 139

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 139 ('सर्वोच्च न्यायालय को कुछ रिट जारी करने की शक्ति प्रदान करना') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 139 भारत के संविधान में 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय को कुछ रिट जारी करने की शक्ति प्रदान करना' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Parliament may by law confer on the Supreme Court power to issue directions, orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 139

Input:
Premise: Parliament may by law confer on the Supreme Court power to issue directions, orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, or any of them, for any purposes other than those mentioned in clause (2) of article 32.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Conferment on the Supreme Court of Powers to Issue Certain Writs' under Article 139.

Output: Entailment


Article 139

Input:
आधार (Premise): Parliament may by law confer on the Supreme Court power to issue directions, orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, or any of them, for any purposes other than those mentioned in clause (2) of article 32.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 139 के तहत 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय को कुछ रिट जारी करने की शक्ति प्रदान करना' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 139

Input:
Premise: Parliament may by law confer on the Supreme Court power to issue directions, orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, or any of them, for any purposes other than those mentioned in clause (2) of article 32.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Conferment on the Supreme Court of Powers to Issue Certain Writs'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 139

Input:
आधार (Premise): Parliament may by law confer on the Supreme Court power to issue directions, orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, or any of them, for any purposes other than those mentioned in clause (2) of article 32.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय को कुछ रिट जारी करने की शक्ति प्रदान करना' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 139

Input:
Premise: Parliament may by law confer on the Supreme Court power to issue directions, orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, or any of them, for any purposes other than those mentioned in clause (2) of article 32.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 139

Input:
आधार (Premise): Parliament may by law confer on the Supreme Court power to issue directions, orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, or any of them, for any purposes other than those mentioned in clause (2) of article 32.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 160

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Discharge of the Functions of the Governor in Certain Contingencies'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 160.

Explanation: Article 160 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Discharge of the Functions of the Governor in Certain Contingencies' under the Constitution of India.


Article 160

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'कतिपय आकस्मिकताओं में राज्यपाल के कार्यों का निर्वहन' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 160 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 160 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'कतिपय आकस्मिकताओं में राज्यपाल के कार्यों का निर्वहन' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 160

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 160 (Discharge of the Functions of the Governor in Certain Contingencies).

Output: Article Article 160 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Discharge of the Functions of the Governor in Certain Contingencies' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: The President may make such provision as he thinks fit for the discharge of the functions of the Governor of a State in any contingency not provided f.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 160

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 160 ('कतिपय आकस्मिकताओं में राज्यपाल के कार्यों का निर्वहन') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 160 भारत के संविधान में 'कतिपय आकस्मिकताओं में राज्यपाल के कार्यों का निर्वहन' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: The President may make such provision as he thinks fit for the discharge of the functions of the Governor of a State in any contingency not provided f...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 160

Input:
Premise: The President may make such provision as he thinks fit for the discharge of the functions of the Governor of a State in any contingency not provided for in this Chapter.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Discharge of the Functions of the Governor in Certain Contingencies' under Article 160.

Output: Entailment


Article 160

Input:
आधार (Premise): The President may make such provision as he thinks fit for the discharge of the functions of the Governor of a State in any contingency not provided for in this Chapter.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 160 के तहत 'कतिपय आकस्मिकताओं में राज्यपाल के कार्यों का निर्वहन' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 160

Input:
Premise: The President may make such provision as he thinks fit for the discharge of the functions of the Governor of a State in any contingency not provided for in this Chapter.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Discharge of the Functions of the Governor in Certain Contingencies'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 160

Input:
आधार (Premise): The President may make such provision as he thinks fit for the discharge of the functions of the Governor of a State in any contingency not provided for in this Chapter.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'कतिपय आकस्मिकताओं में राज्यपाल के कार्यों का निर्वहन' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 160

Input:
Premise: The President may make such provision as he thinks fit for the discharge of the functions of the Governor of a State in any contingency not provided for in this Chapter.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 160

Input:
आधार (Premise): The President may make such provision as he thinks fit for the discharge of the functions of the Governor of a State in any contingency not provided for in this Chapter.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 164

Other Provisions as to Ministers

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Other Provisions as to Ministers'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 164.

Explanation: Article 164 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Other Provisions as to Ministers' under the Constitution of India.


Article 164

मंत्रियों के संबंध में अन्य प्रावधान

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'मंत्रियों के संबंध में अन्य प्रावधान' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 164 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 164 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'मंत्रियों के संबंध में अन्य प्रावधान' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 164

Other Provisions as to Ministers

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 164 (Other Provisions as to Ministers).

Output: Article Article 164 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Other Provisions as to Ministers' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) The Chief Minister shall be appointed by the Governor and the other Ministers shall be appointed by the Governor on the advice of the Chief Minist.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 164

मंत्रियों के संबंध में अन्य प्रावधान

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 164 ('मंत्रियों के संबंध में अन्य प्रावधान') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 164 भारत के संविधान में 'मंत्रियों के संबंध में अन्य प्रावधान' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) The Chief Minister shall be appointed by the Governor and the other Ministers shall be appointed by the Governor on the advice of the Chief Minist...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 164

Other Provisions as to Ministers

Input:
Premise: (1) The Chief Minister shall be appointed by the Governor and the other Ministers shall be appointed by the Governor on the advice of the Chief Minister, and the Ministers shall hold office during the pleasure of the Governor:
Provided that in the States of Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh and Orissa, there shall be a Minister in charge of tribal welfare who may in addition be in charge of the welfare of the Scheduled Castes and backward classes or any other work.
(1A) The total number of Ministers, including the Chief Minister, in the Council of Ministers in a State shall not exceed fifteen per cent. of the total number of members of the Legislative Assembly of that State: Provided that the number of Ministers, including the Chief Minister in a State shall not be less than twelve:
Provided further that where the total number of Ministers including the Chief Minister in the Council of Ministers in any State at the commencement of the Constitution (Ninety-first Amendment) Act, 2003 exceeds the said fifteen per cent. or the number specified in the first proviso, as the case may be, then the total number of Ministers in that State shall be brought in conformity with the provisions of this clause within six months from such date as the President may by public notification appoint.
(1B) A member of the Legislative Assembly of a State or either House of the Legislature of a State having Legislative Council belonging to any political party who is disqualified for being a member of that House under paragraph 2 of the Tenth Schedule shall also be disqualified to be appointed as a Minister under clause (1) for duration of the period commencing from the date of his disqualification till the date on which the term of his office as such member would expire or where he contests any election to the Legislative Assembly of a State or either House of the Legislature of a State having Legislative Council, as the case may be, before the expiry of such period, till the date on which he is declared elected, whichever is earlier.
(2) The Council of Ministers shall be collectively responsible to the Legislative Assembly of the State.
(3) Before a Minister enters upon his office, the Governor shall administer to him the oaths of office and of secrecy according to the forms set out for the purpose in the Third Schedule.
(4) A Minister who for any period of six consecutive months is not a member of the Legislature of the State shall at the expiration of that period cease to be a Minister.
(5) The salaries and allowances of Ministers shall be such as the Legislature of the State may from time to time by law determine and, until the Legislature of the State so determines, shall be as specified in the Second Schedule.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Other Provisions as to Ministers' under Article 164.

Output: Entailment


Article 164

मंत्रियों के संबंध में अन्य प्रावधान

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The Chief Minister shall be appointed by the Governor and the other Ministers shall be appointed by the Governor on the advice of the Chief Minister, and the Ministers shall hold office during the pleasure of the Governor:
Provided that in the States of Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh and Orissa, there shall be a Minister in charge of tribal welfare who may in addition be in charge of the welfare of the Scheduled Castes and backward classes or any other work.
(1A) The total number of Ministers, including the Chief Minister, in the Council of Ministers in a State shall not exceed fifteen per cent. of the total number of members of the Legislative Assembly of that State: Provided that the number of Ministers, including the Chief Minister in a State shall not be less than twelve:
Provided further that where the total number of Ministers including the Chief Minister in the Council of Ministers in any State at the commencement of the Constitution (Ninety-first Amendment) Act, 2003 exceeds the said fifteen per cent. or the number specified in the first proviso, as the case may be, then the total number of Ministers in that State shall be brought in conformity with the provisions of this clause within six months from such date as the President may by public notification appoint.
(1B) A member of the Legislative Assembly of a State or either House of the Legislature of a State having Legislative Council belonging to any political party who is disqualified for being a member of that House under paragraph 2 of the Tenth Schedule shall also be disqualified to be appointed as a Minister under clause (1) for duration of the period commencing from the date of his disqualification till the date on which the term of his office as such member would expire or where he contests any election to the Legislative Assembly of a State or either House of the Legislature of a State having Legislative Council, as the case may be, before the expiry of such period, till the date on which he is declared elected, whichever is earlier.
(2) The Council of Ministers shall be collectively responsible to the Legislative Assembly of the State.
(3) Before a Minister enters upon his office, the Governor shall administer to him the oaths of office and of secrecy according to the forms set out for the purpose in the Third Schedule.
(4) A Minister who for any period of six consecutive months is not a member of the Legislature of the State shall at the expiration of that period cease to be a Minister.
(5) The salaries and allowances of Ministers shall be such as the Legislature of the State may from time to time by law determine and, until the Legislature of the State so determines, shall be as specified in the Second Schedule.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 164 के तहत 'मंत्रियों के संबंध में अन्य प्रावधान' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment