Article 48A

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 48A (Protection and Improvement of Environment and Safeguarding of Forests and Wild Life).

Output: Article Article 48A establishes the fundamental framework for 'Protection and Improvement of Environment and Safeguarding of Forests and Wild Life' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: The State shall endeavour to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the forests and wild life of the country.. This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 48A

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 48A ('पर्यावरण की सुरक्षा और सुधार तथा वनों और वन्य जीवों की सुरक्षा') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 48A भारत के संविधान में 'पर्यावरण की सुरक्षा और सुधार तथा वनों और वन्य जीवों की सुरक्षा' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: राज्य पर्यावरण की रक्षा और सुधार करने तथा देश के वनों और वन्य जीवों की सुरक्षा करने का प्रयास करेगा।। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 48A

Input:
Premise: The State shall endeavour to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the forests and wild life of the country.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Protection and Improvement of Environment and Safeguarding of Forests and Wild Life' under Article 48A.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 48A

Input:
आधार (Premise): राज्य पर्यावरण की रक्षा और सुधार करने तथा देश के वनों और वन्य जीवों की सुरक्षा करने का प्रयास करेगा।

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 48A के तहत 'पर्यावरण की सुरक्षा और सुधार तथा वनों और वन्य जीवों की सुरक्षा' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 48A

Input:
Premise: The State shall endeavour to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the forests and wild life of the country.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Protection and Improvement of Environment and Safeguarding of Forests and Wild Life'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 48A

Input:
आधार (Premise): राज्य पर्यावरण की रक्षा और सुधार करने तथा देश के वनों और वन्य जीवों की सुरक्षा करने का प्रयास करेगा।

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'पर्यावरण की सुरक्षा और सुधार तथा वनों और वन्य जीवों की सुरक्षा' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 48A

Input:
Premise: The State shall endeavour to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the forests and wild life of the country.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 48A

Input:
आधार (Premise): राज्य पर्यावरण की रक्षा और सुधार करने तथा देश के वनों और वन्य जीवों की सुरक्षा करने का प्रयास करेगा।

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 61

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Procedure for Impeachment of the President'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 61.

Explanation: Article 61 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Procedure for Impeachment of the President' under the Constitution of India.


Article 61

राष्ट्रपति पर महाभियोग की प्रक्रिया

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'राष्ट्रपति पर महाभियोग की प्रक्रिया' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 61 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 61 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'राष्ट्रपति पर महाभियोग की प्रक्रिया' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 61

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 61 (Procedure for Impeachment of the President).

Output:
Article Article 61 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Procedure for Impeachment of the President' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) When a President is to be impeached for violation of the Constitution, the charge shall be preferred by either House of Parliament.
(2) No such ch.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 61

राष्ट्रपति पर महाभियोग की प्रक्रिया

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 61 ('राष्ट्रपति पर महाभियोग की प्रक्रिया') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 61 भारत के संविधान में 'राष्ट्रपति पर महाभियोग की प्रक्रिया' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) When a President is to be impeached for violation of the Constitution, the charge shall be preferred by either House of Parliament.
(2) No such ch...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 61

Input:
Premise: (1) When a President is to be impeached for violation of the Constitution, the charge shall be preferred by either House of Parliament.
(2) No such charge shall be preferred unless—
(a) the proposal to prefer such charge is contained in a resolution which has been moved after at least fourteen days' notice in writing signed by not less than one-fourth of the total number of members of the House has been given of their intention to move the resolution, and
(b) such resolution has been passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the total membership of the House.
(3) When a charge has been so preferred by either House of Parliament, the other House shall investigate the charge or cause the charge to be investigated and the President shall have the right to appear and to be represented at such investigation.
(4) If as a result of the investigation a resolution is passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the total membership of the House by which the charge was investigated or caused to be investigated, declaring that the charge preferred against the President has been sustained, such resolution shall have the effect of removing the President from his office as from the date on which the resolution is so passed.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Procedure for Impeachment of the President' under Article 61.

Output: Entailment


Article 61

राष्ट्रपति पर महाभियोग की प्रक्रिया

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) When a President is to be impeached for violation of the Constitution, the charge shall be preferred by either House of Parliament.
(2) No such charge shall be preferred unless—
(a) the proposal to prefer such charge is contained in a resolution which has been moved after at least fourteen days' notice in writing signed by not less than one-fourth of the total number of members of the House has been given of their intention to move the resolution, and
(b) such resolution has been passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the total membership of the House.
(3) When a charge has been so preferred by either House of Parliament, the other House shall investigate the charge or cause the charge to be investigated and the President shall have the right to appear and to be represented at such investigation.
(4) If as a result of the investigation a resolution is passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the total membership of the House by which the charge was investigated or caused to be investigated, declaring that the charge preferred against the President has been sustained, such resolution shall have the effect of removing the President from his office as from the date on which the resolution is so passed.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 61 के तहत 'राष्ट्रपति पर महाभियोग की प्रक्रिया' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 61

Input:
Premise: (1) When a President is to be impeached for violation of the Constitution, the charge shall be preferred by either House of Parliament.
(2) No such charge shall be preferred unless—
(a) the proposal to prefer such charge is contained in a resolution which has been moved after at least fourteen days' notice in writing signed by not less than one-fourth of the total number of members of the House has been given of their intention to move the resolution, and
(b) such resolution has been passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the total membership of the House.
(3) When a charge has been so preferred by either House of Parliament, the other House shall investigate the charge or cause the charge to be investigated and the President shall have the right to appear and to be represented at such investigation.
(4) If as a result of the investigation a resolution is passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the total membership of the House by which the charge was investigated or caused to be investigated, declaring that the charge preferred against the President has been sustained, such resolution shall have the effect of removing the President from his office as from the date on which the resolution is so passed.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Procedure for Impeachment of the President'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 61

राष्ट्रपति पर महाभियोग की प्रक्रिया

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) When a President is to be impeached for violation of the Constitution, the charge shall be preferred by either House of Parliament.
(2) No such charge shall be preferred unless—
(a) the proposal to prefer such charge is contained in a resolution which has been moved after at least fourteen days' notice in writing signed by not less than one-fourth of the total number of members of the House has been given of their intention to move the resolution, and
(b) such resolution has been passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the total membership of the House.
(3) When a charge has been so preferred by either House of Parliament, the other House shall investigate the charge or cause the charge to be investigated and the President shall have the right to appear and to be represented at such investigation.
(4) If as a result of the investigation a resolution is passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the total membership of the House by which the charge was investigated or caused to be investigated, declaring that the charge preferred against the President has been sustained, such resolution shall have the effect of removing the President from his office as from the date on which the resolution is so passed.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'राष्ट्रपति पर महाभियोग की प्रक्रिया' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 61

Input:
Premise: (1) When a President is to be impeached for violation of the Constitution, the charge shall be preferred by either House of Parliament.
(2) No such charge shall be preferred unless—
(a) the proposal to prefer such charge is contained in a resolution which has been moved after at least fourteen days' notice in writing signed by not less than one-fourth of the total number of members of the House has been given of their intention to move the resolution, and
(b) such resolution has been passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the total membership of the House.
(3) When a charge has been so preferred by either House of Parliament, the other House shall investigate the charge or cause the charge to be investigated and the President shall have the right to appear and to be represented at such investigation.
(4) If as a result of the investigation a resolution is passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the total membership of the House by which the charge was investigated or caused to be investigated, declaring that the charge preferred against the President has been sustained, such resolution shall have the effect of removing the President from his office as from the date on which the resolution is so passed.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 61

राष्ट्रपति पर महाभियोग की प्रक्रिया

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) When a President is to be impeached for violation of the Constitution, the charge shall be preferred by either House of Parliament.
(2) No such charge shall be preferred unless—
(a) the proposal to prefer such charge is contained in a resolution which has been moved after at least fourteen days' notice in writing signed by not less than one-fourth of the total number of members of the House has been given of their intention to move the resolution, and
(b) such resolution has been passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the total membership of the House.
(3) When a charge has been so preferred by either House of Parliament, the other House shall investigate the charge or cause the charge to be investigated and the President shall have the right to appear and to be represented at such investigation.
(4) If as a result of the investigation a resolution is passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the total membership of the House by which the charge was investigated or caused to be investigated, declaring that the charge preferred against the President has been sustained, such resolution shall have the effect of removing the President from his office as from the date on which the resolution is so passed.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 69

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Oath or Affirmation by the Vice-president'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 69.

Explanation: Article 69 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Oath or Affirmation by the Vice-president' under the Constitution of India.


Article 69

उपराष्ट्रपति द्वारा शपथ या प्रतिज्ञान

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'उपराष्ट्रपति द्वारा शपथ या प्रतिज्ञान' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 69 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 69 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'उपराष्ट्रपति द्वारा शपथ या प्रतिज्ञान' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 69

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 69 (Oath or Affirmation by the Vice-president).

Output: Article Article 69 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Oath or Affirmation by the Vice-president' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Every Vice-President shall, before entering upon his office, make and subscribe before the President, or some person appointed in that behalf by him, .... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 69

उपराष्ट्रपति द्वारा शपथ या प्रतिज्ञान

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 69 ('उपराष्ट्रपति द्वारा शपथ या प्रतिज्ञान') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 69 भारत के संविधान में 'उपराष्ट्रपति द्वारा शपथ या प्रतिज्ञान' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Every Vice-President shall, before entering upon his office, make and subscribe before the President, or some person appointed in that behalf by him, ...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 69

Input:
Premise: Every Vice-President shall, before entering upon his office, make and subscribe before the President, or some person appointed in that behalf by him, an oath or affirmation in the following form, that is to say —
“I, A.B., do swear in the name of God / solemnly affirm that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India as by law established and that I will faithfully discharge the duty upon which I am about to enter.”

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Oath or Affirmation by the Vice-president' under Article 69.

Output: Entailment


Article 69

उपराष्ट्रपति द्वारा शपथ या प्रतिज्ञान

Input:
आधार (Premise): Every Vice-President shall, before entering upon his office, make and subscribe before the President, or some person appointed in that behalf by him, an oath or affirmation in the following form, that is to say —
“I, A.B., do swear in the name of God / solemnly affirm that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India as by law established and that I will faithfully discharge the duty upon which I am about to enter.”

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 69 के तहत 'उपराष्ट्रपति द्वारा शपथ या प्रतिज्ञान' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 69

Input:
Premise: Every Vice-President shall, before entering upon his office, make and subscribe before the President, or some person appointed in that behalf by him, an oath or affirmation in the following form, that is to say —
“I, A.B., do swear in the name of God / solemnly affirm that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India as by law established and that I will faithfully discharge the duty upon which I am about to enter.”

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Oath or Affirmation by the Vice-president'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 69

उपराष्ट्रपति द्वारा शपथ या प्रतिज्ञान

Input:
आधार (Premise): Every Vice-President shall, before entering upon his office, make and subscribe before the President, or some person appointed in that behalf by him, an oath or affirmation in the following form, that is to say —
“I, A.B., do swear in the name of God / solemnly affirm that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India as by law established and that I will faithfully discharge the duty upon which I am about to enter.”

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'उपराष्ट्रपति द्वारा शपथ या प्रतिज्ञान' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 69

Input:
Premise: Every Vice-President shall, before entering upon his office, make and subscribe before the President, or some person appointed in that behalf by him, an oath or affirmation in the following form, that is to say —
“I, A.B., do swear in the name of God / solemnly affirm that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India as by law established and that I will faithfully discharge the duty upon which I am about to enter.”

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 69

उपराष्ट्रपति द्वारा शपथ या प्रतिज्ञान

Input:
आधार (Premise): Every Vice-President shall, before entering upon his office, make and subscribe before the President, or some person appointed in that behalf by him, an oath or affirmation in the following form, that is to say —
“I, A.B., do swear in the name of God / solemnly affirm that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India as by law established and that I will faithfully discharge the duty upon which I am about to enter.”

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 71

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Matters Relating To, or Connected With, the Election of a President or Vice-president'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 71.

Explanation: Article 71 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Matters Relating To, or Connected With, the Election of a President or Vice-president' under the Constitution of India.


Article 71

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'राष्ट्रपति या उपराष्ट्रपति के चुनाव से संबंधित या उससे जुड़े मामले' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 71 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 71 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'राष्ट्रपति या उपराष्ट्रपति के चुनाव से संबंधित या उससे जुड़े मामले' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 71

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 71 (Matters Relating To, or Connected With, the Election of a President or Vice-president).

Output: Article Article 71 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Matters Relating To, or Connected With, the Election of a President or Vice-president' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) All doubts and disputes arising out of or in connection with the election of a President or Vice - President shall be inquired into and decided by.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 71

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 71 ('राष्ट्रपति या उपराष्ट्रपति के चुनाव से संबंधित या उससे जुड़े मामले') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 71 भारत के संविधान में 'राष्ट्रपति या उपराष्ट्रपति के चुनाव से संबंधित या उससे जुड़े मामले' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) All doubts and disputes arising out of or in connection with the election of a President or Vice - President shall be inquired into and decided by...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 71

Input:
Premise: (1) All doubts and disputes arising out of or in connection with the election of a President or Vice - President shall be inquired into and decided by the Supreme Court whose decision shall be final.
(2) If the election of a person as President or Vice - President is declared void by the Supreme Court, acts done by him in the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of the office of President or Vice - President, as the case may be, on or before the date of the decision of the Supreme Court shall not be invalidated by reason of that declaration.
(3) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, Parliament may by law regulate any matter relating to or connected with the election of a President or Vice - President.
(4) The election of a person as President or Vice - President shall not be called in question on the ground of the existence of any vacancy for whatever reason among the members of the electoral college electing him

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Matters Relating To, or Connected With, the Election of a President or Vice-president' under Article 71.

Output: Entailment


Article 71

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) All doubts and disputes arising out of or in connection with the election of a President or Vice - President shall be inquired into and decided by the Supreme Court whose decision shall be final.
(2) If the election of a person as President or Vice - President is declared void by the Supreme Court, acts done by him in the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of the office of President or Vice - President, as the case may be, on or before the date of the decision of the Supreme Court shall not be invalidated by reason of that declaration.
(3) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, Parliament may by law regulate any matter relating to or connected with the election of a President or Vice - President.
(4) The election of a person as President or Vice - President shall not be called in question on the ground of the existence of any vacancy for whatever reason among the members of the electoral college electing him

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 71 के तहत 'राष्ट्रपति या उपराष्ट्रपति के चुनाव से संबंधित या उससे जुड़े मामले' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 71

Input:
Premise: (1) All doubts and disputes arising out of or in connection with the election of a President or Vice - President shall be inquired into and decided by the Supreme Court whose decision shall be final.
(2) If the election of a person as President or Vice - President is declared void by the Supreme Court, acts done by him in the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of the office of President or Vice - President, as the case may be, on or before the date of the decision of the Supreme Court shall not be invalidated by reason of that declaration.
(3) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, Parliament may by law regulate any matter relating to or connected with the election of a President or Vice - President.
(4) The election of a person as President or Vice - President shall not be called in question on the ground of the existence of any vacancy for whatever reason among the members of the electoral college electing him

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Matters Relating To, or Connected With, the Election of a President or Vice-president'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 71

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) All doubts and disputes arising out of or in connection with the election of a President or Vice - President shall be inquired into and decided by the Supreme Court whose decision shall be final.
(2) If the election of a person as President or Vice - President is declared void by the Supreme Court, acts done by him in the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of the office of President or Vice - President, as the case may be, on or before the date of the decision of the Supreme Court shall not be invalidated by reason of that declaration.
(3) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, Parliament may by law regulate any matter relating to or connected with the election of a President or Vice - President.
(4) The election of a person as President or Vice - President shall not be called in question on the ground of the existence of any vacancy for whatever reason among the members of the electoral college electing him

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'राष्ट्रपति या उपराष्ट्रपति के चुनाव से संबंधित या उससे जुड़े मामले' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 71

Input:
Premise: (1) All doubts and disputes arising out of or in connection with the election of a President or Vice - President shall be inquired into and decided by the Supreme Court whose decision shall be final.
(2) If the election of a person as President or Vice - President is declared void by the Supreme Court, acts done by him in the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of the office of President or Vice - President, as the case may be, on or before the date of the decision of the Supreme Court shall not be invalidated by reason of that declaration.
(3) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, Parliament may by law regulate any matter relating to or connected with the election of a President or Vice - President.
(4) The election of a person as President or Vice - President shall not be called in question on the ground of the existence of any vacancy for whatever reason among the members of the electoral college electing him

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 71

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) All doubts and disputes arising out of or in connection with the election of a President or Vice - President shall be inquired into and decided by the Supreme Court whose decision shall be final.
(2) If the election of a person as President or Vice - President is declared void by the Supreme Court, acts done by him in the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of the office of President or Vice - President, as the case may be, on or before the date of the decision of the Supreme Court shall not be invalidated by reason of that declaration.
(3) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, Parliament may by law regulate any matter relating to or connected with the election of a President or Vice - President.
(4) The election of a person as President or Vice - President shall not be called in question on the ground of the existence of any vacancy for whatever reason among the members of the electoral college electing him

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 91

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Power of the Deputy Chairman or Other Person to Perform the Duties of the Office Of, or to Act As, Chairman'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 91.

Explanation: Article 91 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Power of the Deputy Chairman or Other Person to Perform the Duties of the Office Of, or to Act As, Chairman' under the Constitution of India.


Article 91

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'उपाध्यक्ष या अन्य व्यक्ति की कार्यालय के कर्तव्यों का पालन करने या अध्यक्ष के रूप में कार्य करने की शक्ति' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 91 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 91 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'उपाध्यक्ष या अन्य व्यक्ति की कार्यालय के कर्तव्यों का पालन करने या अध्यक्ष के रूप में कार्य करने की शक्ति' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 91

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 91 (Power of the Deputy Chairman or Other Person to Perform the Duties of the Office Of, or to Act As, Chairman).

Output: Article Article 91 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Power of the Deputy Chairman or Other Person to Perform the Duties of the Office Of, or to Act As, Chairman' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) While the office of Chairman is vacant, or during any period when the Vice-President is acting as, or discharging the functions of, President, the.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 91

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 91 ('उपाध्यक्ष या अन्य व्यक्ति की कार्यालय के कर्तव्यों का पालन करने या अध्यक्ष के रूप में कार्य करने की शक्ति') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 91 भारत के संविधान में 'उपाध्यक्ष या अन्य व्यक्ति की कार्यालय के कर्तव्यों का पालन करने या अध्यक्ष के रूप में कार्य करने की शक्ति' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) While the office of Chairman is vacant, or during any period when the Vice-President is acting as, or discharging the functions of, President, the...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 91

Input:
Premise: (1) While the office of Chairman is vacant, or during any period when the Vice-President is acting as, or discharging the functions of, President, the duties of the office shall be performed by the Deputy Chairman, or, if the office of Deputy Chairman is also vacant, by such member of the Council of States as the President may appoint for the purpose.
(2) During the absence of the Chairman from any sitting of the Council of States the Deputy Chairman, or, if he is also absent, such person as may be determined by the rules of procedure of the Council, or, if no such person is present, such other person as may be determined by the Council, shall act as Chairman.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Power of the Deputy Chairman or Other Person to Perform the Duties of the Office Of, or to Act As, Chairman' under Article 91.

Output: Entailment


Article 91

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) While the office of Chairman is vacant, or during any period when the Vice-President is acting as, or discharging the functions of, President, the duties of the office shall be performed by the Deputy Chairman, or, if the office of Deputy Chairman is also vacant, by such member of the Council of States as the President may appoint for the purpose.
(2) During the absence of the Chairman from any sitting of the Council of States the Deputy Chairman, or, if he is also absent, such person as may be determined by the rules of procedure of the Council, or, if no such person is present, such other person as may be determined by the Council, shall act as Chairman.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 91 के तहत 'उपाध्यक्ष या अन्य व्यक्ति की कार्यालय के कर्तव्यों का पालन करने या अध्यक्ष के रूप में कार्य करने की शक्ति' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 91

Input:
Premise: (1) While the office of Chairman is vacant, or during any period when the Vice-President is acting as, or discharging the functions of, President, the duties of the office shall be performed by the Deputy Chairman, or, if the office of Deputy Chairman is also vacant, by such member of the Council of States as the President may appoint for the purpose.
(2) During the absence of the Chairman from any sitting of the Council of States the Deputy Chairman, or, if he is also absent, such person as may be determined by the rules of procedure of the Council, or, if no such person is present, such other person as may be determined by the Council, shall act as Chairman.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Power of the Deputy Chairman or Other Person to Perform the Duties of the Office Of, or to Act As, Chairman'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 91

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) While the office of Chairman is vacant, or during any period when the Vice-President is acting as, or discharging the functions of, President, the duties of the office shall be performed by the Deputy Chairman, or, if the office of Deputy Chairman is also vacant, by such member of the Council of States as the President may appoint for the purpose.
(2) During the absence of the Chairman from any sitting of the Council of States the Deputy Chairman, or, if he is also absent, such person as may be determined by the rules of procedure of the Council, or, if no such person is present, such other person as may be determined by the Council, shall act as Chairman.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'उपाध्यक्ष या अन्य व्यक्ति की कार्यालय के कर्तव्यों का पालन करने या अध्यक्ष के रूप में कार्य करने की शक्ति' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 91

Input:
Premise: (1) While the office of Chairman is vacant, or during any period when the Vice-President is acting as, or discharging the functions of, President, the duties of the office shall be performed by the Deputy Chairman, or, if the office of Deputy Chairman is also vacant, by such member of the Council of States as the President may appoint for the purpose.
(2) During the absence of the Chairman from any sitting of the Council of States the Deputy Chairman, or, if he is also absent, such person as may be determined by the rules of procedure of the Council, or, if no such person is present, such other person as may be determined by the Council, shall act as Chairman.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 91

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) While the office of Chairman is vacant, or during any period when the Vice-President is acting as, or discharging the functions of, President, the duties of the office shall be performed by the Deputy Chairman, or, if the office of Deputy Chairman is also vacant, by such member of the Council of States as the President may appoint for the purpose.
(2) During the absence of the Chairman from any sitting of the Council of States the Deputy Chairman, or, if he is also absent, such person as may be determined by the rules of procedure of the Council, or, if no such person is present, such other person as may be determined by the Council, shall act as Chairman.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 100

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Voting in Houses, Power of Houses to Act Notwithstanding Vacancies and Quorum'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 100.

Explanation: Article 100 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Voting in Houses, Power of Houses to Act Notwithstanding Vacancies and Quorum' under the Constitution of India.


Article 100

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'सदनों में मतदान, रिक्तियों के बावजूद कार्य करने की सदनों की शक्ति और कोरम' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 100 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 100 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'सदनों में मतदान, रिक्तियों के बावजूद कार्य करने की सदनों की शक्ति और कोरम' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 100

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 100 (Voting in Houses, Power of Houses to Act Notwithstanding Vacancies and Quorum).

Output: Article Article 100 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Voting in Houses, Power of Houses to Act Notwithstanding Vacancies and Quorum' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) Save as otherwise provided in this Constitution, all questions at any sitting of either House or joint sitting of the Houses shall be determined b.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 100

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 100 ('सदनों में मतदान, रिक्तियों के बावजूद कार्य करने की सदनों की शक्ति और कोरम') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 100 भारत के संविधान में 'सदनों में मतदान, रिक्तियों के बावजूद कार्य करने की सदनों की शक्ति और कोरम' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) Save as otherwise provided in this Constitution, all questions at any sitting of either House or joint sitting of the Houses shall be determined b...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 100

Input:
Premise: (1) Save as otherwise provided in this Constitution, all questions at any sitting of either House or joint sitting of the Houses shall be determined by a majority of votes of the members present and voting, other than the Speaker or person acting as Chairman or Speaker.
The Chairman or Speaker, or person acting as such, shall not vote in the first instance, but shall have and exercise a casting vote in the case of an equality of votes.
(2) Either House of Parliament shall have power to act notwithstanding any vacancy in the membership thereof, and any proceedings in Parliament shall be valid notwithstanding that it is discovered subsequently that some person who was not entitled so to do sat or voted or otherwise took part in the proceedings.
(3) Until Parliament by law otherwise provides, the quorum to constitute a meeting of either House of Parliament shall be one-tenth of the total number of members of the House. (4) If at any time during a meeting of a House there is no quorum, it shall be the duty of the Chairman or Speaker, or person acting as such, either to adjourn the House or to suspend the meeting until there is a quorum.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Voting in Houses, Power of Houses to Act Notwithstanding Vacancies and Quorum' under Article 100.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 100

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Save as otherwise provided in this Constitution, all questions at any sitting of either House or joint sitting of the Houses shall be determined by a majority of votes of the members present and voting, other than the Speaker or person acting as Chairman or Speaker.
The Chairman or Speaker, or person acting as such, shall not vote in the first instance, but shall have and exercise a casting vote in the case of an equality of votes.
(2) Either House of Parliament shall have power to act notwithstanding any vacancy in the membership thereof, and any proceedings in Parliament shall be valid notwithstanding that it is discovered subsequently that some person who was not entitled so to do sat or voted or otherwise took part in the proceedings.
(3) Until Parliament by law otherwise provides, the quorum to constitute a meeting of either House of Parliament shall be one-tenth of the total number of members of the House. (4) If at any time during a meeting of a House there is no quorum, it shall be the duty of the Chairman or Speaker, or person acting as such, either to adjourn the House or to suspend the meeting until there is a quorum.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 100 के तहत 'सदनों में मतदान, रिक्तियों के बावजूद कार्य करने की सदनों की शक्ति और कोरम' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 100

Input:
Premise: (1) Save as otherwise provided in this Constitution, all questions at any sitting of either House or joint sitting of the Houses shall be determined by a majority of votes of the members present and voting, other than the Speaker or person acting as Chairman or Speaker.
The Chairman or Speaker, or person acting as such, shall not vote in the first instance, but shall have and exercise a casting vote in the case of an equality of votes.
(2) Either House of Parliament shall have power to act notwithstanding any vacancy in the membership thereof, and any proceedings in Parliament shall be valid notwithstanding that it is discovered subsequently that some person who was not entitled so to do sat or voted or otherwise took part in the proceedings.
(3) Until Parliament by law otherwise provides, the quorum to constitute a meeting of either House of Parliament shall be one-tenth of the total number of members of the House. (4) If at any time during a meeting of a House there is no quorum, it shall be the duty of the Chairman or Speaker, or person acting as such, either to adjourn the House or to suspend the meeting until there is a quorum.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Voting in Houses, Power of Houses to Act Notwithstanding Vacancies and Quorum'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 100

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Save as otherwise provided in this Constitution, all questions at any sitting of either House or joint sitting of the Houses shall be determined by a majority of votes of the members present and voting, other than the Speaker or person acting as Chairman or Speaker.
The Chairman or Speaker, or person acting as such, shall not vote in the first instance, but shall have and exercise a casting vote in the case of an equality of votes.
(2) Either House of Parliament shall have power to act notwithstanding any vacancy in the membership thereof, and any proceedings in Parliament shall be valid notwithstanding that it is discovered subsequently that some person who was not entitled so to do sat or voted or otherwise took part in the proceedings.
(3) Until Parliament by law otherwise provides, the quorum to constitute a meeting of either House of Parliament shall be one-tenth of the total number of members of the House. (4) If at any time during a meeting of a House there is no quorum, it shall be the duty of the Chairman or Speaker, or person acting as such, either to adjourn the House or to suspend the meeting until there is a quorum.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'सदनों में मतदान, रिक्तियों के बावजूद कार्य करने की सदनों की शक्ति और कोरम' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 100

Input:
Premise: (1) Save as otherwise provided in this Constitution, all questions at any sitting of either House or joint sitting of the Houses shall be determined by a majority of votes of the members present and voting, other than the Speaker or person acting as Chairman or Speaker.
The Chairman or Speaker, or person acting as such, shall not vote in the first instance, but shall have and exercise a casting vote in the case of an equality of votes.
(2) Either House of Parliament shall have power to act notwithstanding any vacancy in the membership thereof, and any proceedings in Parliament shall be valid notwithstanding that it is discovered subsequently that some person who was not entitled so to do sat or voted or otherwise took part in the proceedings.
(3) Until Parliament by law otherwise provides, the quorum to constitute a meeting of either House of Parliament shall be one-tenth of the total number of members of the House. (4) If at any time during a meeting of a House there is no quorum, it shall be the duty of the Chairman or Speaker, or person acting as such, either to adjourn the House or to suspend the meeting until there is a quorum.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 100

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Save as otherwise provided in this Constitution, all questions at any sitting of either House or joint sitting of the Houses shall be determined by a majority of votes of the members present and voting, other than the Speaker or person acting as Chairman or Speaker.
The Chairman or Speaker, or person acting as such, shall not vote in the first instance, but shall have and exercise a casting vote in the case of an equality of votes.
(2) Either House of Parliament shall have power to act notwithstanding any vacancy in the membership thereof, and any proceedings in Parliament shall be valid notwithstanding that it is discovered subsequently that some person who was not entitled so to do sat or voted or otherwise took part in the proceedings.
(3) Until Parliament by law otherwise provides, the quorum to constitute a meeting of either House of Parliament shall be one-tenth of the total number of members of the House. (4) If at any time during a meeting of a House there is no quorum, it shall be the duty of the Chairman or Speaker, or person acting as such, either to adjourn the House or to suspend the meeting until there is a quorum.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 101

Vacation of Seats

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Vacation of Seats'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 101.

Explanation: Article 101 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Vacation of Seats' under the Constitution of India.


Article 101

सीटों की रिक्ति

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'सीटों की रिक्ति' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 101 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 101 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'सीटों की रिक्ति' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 101

Vacation of Seats

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 101 (Vacation of Seats).

Output: Article Article 101 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Vacation of Seats' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chos.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 101

सीटों की रिक्ति

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 101 ('सीटों की रिक्ति') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 101 भारत के संविधान में 'सीटों की रिक्ति' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chos...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 101

Vacation of Seats

Input:
Premise: (1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chosen a member of both Houses of his seat in one House or the other.
(2) No person shall be a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State and if a person is chosen a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State, then, at the expiration of such period as may be specified in rules made by the President, that person's seat in Parliament shall become vacant, unless he has previously resigned his seat in the Legislature of the State.
(3) If a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) becomes subject to any of the disqualifications mentioned in clause (1) or clause (2) of article 102, or 5
(b) resigns his seat by writing under his hand addressed to the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, and his resignation is accepted by the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
Provided that in the case of any resignation referred to in sub-clause (b), if from information received or otherwise and after making such inquiry as he thinks fit, the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, is satisfied that such resignation is not voluntary or genuine, he shall not accept such resignation.
(4) If for a period of sixty days a member of either House of Parliament is without permission of the House absent from all meetings thereof, the House may declare his seat vacant:
Provided that in computing the said period of sixty days no account shall be taken of any period during which the House is prorogued or is adjourned for more than four consecutive days.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Vacation of Seats' under Article 101.

Output: Entailment


Article 101

सीटों की रिक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chosen a member of both Houses of his seat in one House or the other.
(2) No person shall be a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State and if a person is chosen a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State, then, at the expiration of such period as may be specified in rules made by the President, that person's seat in Parliament shall become vacant, unless he has previously resigned his seat in the Legislature of the State.
(3) If a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) becomes subject to any of the disqualifications mentioned in clause (1) or clause (2) of article 102, or 5
(b) resigns his seat by writing under his hand addressed to the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, and his resignation is accepted by the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
Provided that in the case of any resignation referred to in sub-clause (b), if from information received or otherwise and after making such inquiry as he thinks fit, the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, is satisfied that such resignation is not voluntary or genuine, he shall not accept such resignation.
(4) If for a period of sixty days a member of either House of Parliament is without permission of the House absent from all meetings thereof, the House may declare his seat vacant:
Provided that in computing the said period of sixty days no account shall be taken of any period during which the House is prorogued or is adjourned for more than four consecutive days.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 101 के तहत 'सीटों की रिक्ति' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 101

Vacation of Seats

Input:
Premise: (1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chosen a member of both Houses of his seat in one House or the other.
(2) No person shall be a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State and if a person is chosen a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State, then, at the expiration of such period as may be specified in rules made by the President, that person's seat in Parliament shall become vacant, unless he has previously resigned his seat in the Legislature of the State.
(3) If a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) becomes subject to any of the disqualifications mentioned in clause (1) or clause (2) of article 102, or 5
(b) resigns his seat by writing under his hand addressed to the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, and his resignation is accepted by the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
Provided that in the case of any resignation referred to in sub-clause (b), if from information received or otherwise and after making such inquiry as he thinks fit, the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, is satisfied that such resignation is not voluntary or genuine, he shall not accept such resignation.
(4) If for a period of sixty days a member of either House of Parliament is without permission of the House absent from all meetings thereof, the House may declare his seat vacant:
Provided that in computing the said period of sixty days no account shall be taken of any period during which the House is prorogued or is adjourned for more than four consecutive days.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Vacation of Seats'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 101

सीटों की रिक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chosen a member of both Houses of his seat in one House or the other.
(2) No person shall be a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State and if a person is chosen a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State, then, at the expiration of such period as may be specified in rules made by the President, that person's seat in Parliament shall become vacant, unless he has previously resigned his seat in the Legislature of the State.
(3) If a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) becomes subject to any of the disqualifications mentioned in clause (1) or clause (2) of article 102, or 5
(b) resigns his seat by writing under his hand addressed to the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, and his resignation is accepted by the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
Provided that in the case of any resignation referred to in sub-clause (b), if from information received or otherwise and after making such inquiry as he thinks fit, the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, is satisfied that such resignation is not voluntary or genuine, he shall not accept such resignation.
(4) If for a period of sixty days a member of either House of Parliament is without permission of the House absent from all meetings thereof, the House may declare his seat vacant:
Provided that in computing the said period of sixty days no account shall be taken of any period during which the House is prorogued or is adjourned for more than four consecutive days.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'सीटों की रिक्ति' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 101

Vacation of Seats

Input:
Premise: (1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chosen a member of both Houses of his seat in one House or the other.
(2) No person shall be a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State and if a person is chosen a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State, then, at the expiration of such period as may be specified in rules made by the President, that person's seat in Parliament shall become vacant, unless he has previously resigned his seat in the Legislature of the State.
(3) If a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) becomes subject to any of the disqualifications mentioned in clause (1) or clause (2) of article 102, or 5
(b) resigns his seat by writing under his hand addressed to the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, and his resignation is accepted by the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
Provided that in the case of any resignation referred to in sub-clause (b), if from information received or otherwise and after making such inquiry as he thinks fit, the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, is satisfied that such resignation is not voluntary or genuine, he shall not accept such resignation.
(4) If for a period of sixty days a member of either House of Parliament is without permission of the House absent from all meetings thereof, the House may declare his seat vacant:
Provided that in computing the said period of sixty days no account shall be taken of any period during which the House is prorogued or is adjourned for more than four consecutive days.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 101

सीटों की रिक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chosen a member of both Houses of his seat in one House or the other.
(2) No person shall be a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State and if a person is chosen a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State, then, at the expiration of such period as may be specified in rules made by the President, that person's seat in Parliament shall become vacant, unless he has previously resigned his seat in the Legislature of the State.
(3) If a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) becomes subject to any of the disqualifications mentioned in clause (1) or clause (2) of article 102, or 5
(b) resigns his seat by writing under his hand addressed to the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, and his resignation is accepted by the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
Provided that in the case of any resignation referred to in sub-clause (b), if from information received or otherwise and after making such inquiry as he thinks fit, the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, is satisfied that such resignation is not voluntary or genuine, he shall not accept such resignation.
(4) If for a period of sixty days a member of either House of Parliament is without permission of the House absent from all meetings thereof, the House may declare his seat vacant:
Provided that in computing the said period of sixty days no account shall be taken of any period during which the House is prorogued or is adjourned for more than four consecutive days.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 102

Disqualifications for Membership

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Disqualifications for Membership'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 102.

Explanation: Article 102 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Disqualifications for Membership' under the Constitution of India.


Article 102

सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 102 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 102 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 102

Disqualifications for Membership

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 102 (Disqualifications for Membership).

Output:
Article Article 102 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Disqualifications for Membership' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) if he holds any office of profit u.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 102

सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 102 ('सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 102 भारत के संविधान में 'सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) if he holds any office of profit u...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 102

Disqualifications for Membership

Input:
Premise: (1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) if he holds any office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State, other than an office declared by Parliament by law not to disqualify its holder;
(b) if he is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court;
(c) if he is an undischarged insolvent;
(d) if he is not a citizen of India, or has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a foreign State, or is under any acknowledgment of allegiance or adherence to a foreign State;
(e) if he is so disqualified by or under any law made by Parliament.
Explanation.— For the purposes of this clause a person shall not be deemed to hold an office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State by reason only that he is a Minister either for the Union or for such State.
(2) A person shall be disqualified for being a member of either House of Parliament if he is so disqualified under the Tenth Schedule.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Disqualifications for Membership' under Article 102.

Output: Entailment


Article 102

सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) if he holds any office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State, other than an office declared by Parliament by law not to disqualify its holder;
(b) if he is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court;
(c) if he is an undischarged insolvent;
(d) if he is not a citizen of India, or has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a foreign State, or is under any acknowledgment of allegiance or adherence to a foreign State;
(e) if he is so disqualified by or under any law made by Parliament.
Explanation.— For the purposes of this clause a person shall not be deemed to hold an office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State by reason only that he is a Minister either for the Union or for such State.
(2) A person shall be disqualified for being a member of either House of Parliament if he is so disqualified under the Tenth Schedule.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 102 के तहत 'सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 102

Disqualifications for Membership

Input:
Premise: (1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) if he holds any office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State, other than an office declared by Parliament by law not to disqualify its holder;
(b) if he is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court;
(c) if he is an undischarged insolvent;
(d) if he is not a citizen of India, or has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a foreign State, or is under any acknowledgment of allegiance or adherence to a foreign State;
(e) if he is so disqualified by or under any law made by Parliament.
Explanation.— For the purposes of this clause a person shall not be deemed to hold an office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State by reason only that he is a Minister either for the Union or for such State.
(2) A person shall be disqualified for being a member of either House of Parliament if he is so disqualified under the Tenth Schedule.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Disqualifications for Membership'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 102

सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) if he holds any office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State, other than an office declared by Parliament by law not to disqualify its holder;
(b) if he is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court;
(c) if he is an undischarged insolvent;
(d) if he is not a citizen of India, or has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a foreign State, or is under any acknowledgment of allegiance or adherence to a foreign State;
(e) if he is so disqualified by or under any law made by Parliament.
Explanation.— For the purposes of this clause a person shall not be deemed to hold an office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State by reason only that he is a Minister either for the Union or for such State.
(2) A person shall be disqualified for being a member of either House of Parliament if he is so disqualified under the Tenth Schedule.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 102

Disqualifications for Membership

Input:
Premise: (1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) if he holds any office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State, other than an office declared by Parliament by law not to disqualify its holder;
(b) if he is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court;
(c) if he is an undischarged insolvent;
(d) if he is not a citizen of India, or has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a foreign State, or is under any acknowledgment of allegiance or adherence to a foreign State;
(e) if he is so disqualified by or under any law made by Parliament.
Explanation.— For the purposes of this clause a person shall not be deemed to hold an office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State by reason only that he is a Minister either for the Union or for such State.
(2) A person shall be disqualified for being a member of either House of Parliament if he is so disqualified under the Tenth Schedule.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 102

सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) if he holds any office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State, other than an office declared by Parliament by law not to disqualify its holder;
(b) if he is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court;
(c) if he is an undischarged insolvent;
(d) if he is not a citizen of India, or has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a foreign State, or is under any acknowledgment of allegiance or adherence to a foreign State;
(e) if he is so disqualified by or under any law made by Parliament.
Explanation.— For the purposes of this clause a person shall not be deemed to hold an office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State by reason only that he is a Minister either for the Union or for such State.
(2) A person shall be disqualified for being a member of either House of Parliament if he is so disqualified under the Tenth Schedule.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 104

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Penalty for Sitting and Voting Before Making Oath or Affirmation Under Article 99 or When Not Qualified or When Disqualified'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 104.

Explanation: Article 104 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Penalty for Sitting and Voting Before Making Oath or Affirmation Under Article 99 or When Not Qualified or When Disqualified' under the Constitution of India.


Article 104

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'अनुच्छेद 99 के तहत शपथ लेने या प्रतिज्ञान करने से पहले बैठने और मतदान करने के लिए दंड, या जब योग्य न हो या अयोग्य हो तो जुर्माना' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 104 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 104 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'अनुच्छेद 99 के तहत शपथ लेने या प्रतिज्ञान करने से पहले बैठने और मतदान करने के लिए दंड, या जब योग्य न हो या अयोग्य हो तो जुर्माना' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 104

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 104 (Penalty for Sitting and Voting Before Making Oath or Affirmation Under Article 99 or When Not Qualified or When Disqualified).

Output: Article Article 104 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Penalty for Sitting and Voting Before Making Oath or Affirmation Under Article 99 or When Not Qualified or When Disqualified' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that .... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 104

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 104 ('अनुच्छेद 99 के तहत शपथ लेने या प्रतिज्ञान करने से पहले बैठने और मतदान करने के लिए दंड, या जब योग्य न हो या अयोग्य हो तो जुर्माना') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 104 भारत के संविधान में 'अनुच्छेद 99 के तहत शपथ लेने या प्रतिज्ञान करने से पहले बैठने और मतदान करने के लिए दंड, या जब योग्य न हो या अयोग्य हो तो जुर्माना' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that ...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 104

Input:
Premise: If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that he is not qualified or that he is disqualified for membership thereof, or that he is prohibited from so doing by the provisions of any law made by Parliament, he shall be liable in respect of each day on which he so sits or votes to a penalty of five hundred rupees to be recovered as a debt due to the Union.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Penalty for Sitting and Voting Before Making Oath or Affirmation Under Article 99 or When Not Qualified or When Disqualified' under Article 104.

Output: Entailment


Article 104

Input:
आधार (Premise): If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that he is not qualified or that he is disqualified for membership thereof, or that he is prohibited from so doing by the provisions of any law made by Parliament, he shall be liable in respect of each day on which he so sits or votes to a penalty of five hundred rupees to be recovered as a debt due to the Union.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 104 के तहत 'अनुच्छेद 99 के तहत शपथ लेने या प्रतिज्ञान करने से पहले बैठने और मतदान करने के लिए दंड, या जब योग्य न हो या अयोग्य हो तो जुर्माना' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 104

Input:
Premise: If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that he is not qualified or that he is disqualified for membership thereof, or that he is prohibited from so doing by the provisions of any law made by Parliament, he shall be liable in respect of each day on which he so sits or votes to a penalty of five hundred rupees to be recovered as a debt due to the Union.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Penalty for Sitting and Voting Before Making Oath or Affirmation Under Article 99 or When Not Qualified or When Disqualified'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 104

Input:
आधार (Premise): If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that he is not qualified or that he is disqualified for membership thereof, or that he is prohibited from so doing by the provisions of any law made by Parliament, he shall be liable in respect of each day on which he so sits or votes to a penalty of five hundred rupees to be recovered as a debt due to the Union.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'अनुच्छेद 99 के तहत शपथ लेने या प्रतिज्ञान करने से पहले बैठने और मतदान करने के लिए दंड, या जब योग्य न हो या अयोग्य हो तो जुर्माना' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 104

Input:
Premise: If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that he is not qualified or that he is disqualified for membership thereof, or that he is prohibited from so doing by the provisions of any law made by Parliament, he shall be liable in respect of each day on which he so sits or votes to a penalty of five hundred rupees to be recovered as a debt due to the Union.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 104

Input:
आधार (Premise): If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that he is not qualified or that he is disqualified for membership thereof, or that he is prohibited from so doing by the provisions of any law made by Parliament, he shall be liable in respect of each day on which he so sits or votes to a penalty of five hundred rupees to be recovered as a debt due to the Union.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 109

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Special Procedure in Respect of Money Bills'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 109.

Explanation: Article 109 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Special Procedure in Respect of Money Bills' under the Constitution of India.


Article 109

धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 109 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 109 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 109

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 109 (Special Procedure in Respect of Money Bills).

Output:
Article Article 109 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Special Procedure in Respect of Money Bills' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
(2) After a Money Bill has been passed by the House of the People it shall be trans.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 109

धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 109 ('धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 109 भारत के संविधान में 'धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
(2) After a Money Bill has been passed by the House of the People it shall be trans...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 109

Input:
Premise: (1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
(2) After a Money Bill has been passed by the House of the People it shall be transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations and the Council of States shall within a period of fourteen days from the date of its receipt of the Bill return the Bill to the House of the People with its recommendations and the House of the People may thereupon either accept or reject all or any of the recommendations of the Council of States.
(3) If the House of the People accepts any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses with the amendments recommended by the Council of States and accepted by the House of the People.
(4) If the House of the People does not accept any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People without any of the amendments recommended by the Council of States.
(5) If a Money Bill passed by the House of the People and transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations is not returned to the House of the People within the said period of fourteen days, it shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses at the expiration of the said period in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Special Procedure in Respect of Money Bills' under Article 109.

Output: Entailment


Article 109

धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
(2) After a Money Bill has been passed by the House of the People it shall be transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations and the Council of States shall within a period of fourteen days from the date of its receipt of the Bill return the Bill to the House of the People with its recommendations and the House of the People may thereupon either accept or reject all or any of the recommendations of the Council of States.
(3) If the House of the People accepts any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses with the amendments recommended by the Council of States and accepted by the House of the People.
(4) If the House of the People does not accept any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People without any of the amendments recommended by the Council of States.
(5) If a Money Bill passed by the House of the People and transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations is not returned to the House of the People within the said period of fourteen days, it shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses at the expiration of the said period in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 109 के तहत 'धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 109

Input:
Premise: (1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
(2) After a Money Bill has been passed by the House of the People it shall be transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations and the Council of States shall within a period of fourteen days from the date of its receipt of the Bill return the Bill to the House of the People with its recommendations and the House of the People may thereupon either accept or reject all or any of the recommendations of the Council of States.
(3) If the House of the People accepts any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses with the amendments recommended by the Council of States and accepted by the House of the People.
(4) If the House of the People does not accept any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People without any of the amendments recommended by the Council of States.
(5) If a Money Bill passed by the House of the People and transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations is not returned to the House of the People within the said period of fourteen days, it shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses at the expiration of the said period in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Special Procedure in Respect of Money Bills'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 109

धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
(2) After a Money Bill has been passed by the House of the People it shall be transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations and the Council of States shall within a period of fourteen days from the date of its receipt of the Bill return the Bill to the House of the People with its recommendations and the House of the People may thereupon either accept or reject all or any of the recommendations of the Council of States.
(3) If the House of the People accepts any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses with the amendments recommended by the Council of States and accepted by the House of the People.
(4) If the House of the People does not accept any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People without any of the amendments recommended by the Council of States.
(5) If a Money Bill passed by the House of the People and transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations is not returned to the House of the People within the said period of fourteen days, it shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses at the expiration of the said period in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 109

Input:
Premise: (1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
(2) After a Money Bill has been passed by the House of the People it shall be transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations and the Council of States shall within a period of fourteen days from the date of its receipt of the Bill return the Bill to the House of the People with its recommendations and the House of the People may thereupon either accept or reject all or any of the recommendations of the Council of States.
(3) If the House of the People accepts any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses with the amendments recommended by the Council of States and accepted by the House of the People.
(4) If the House of the People does not accept any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People without any of the amendments recommended by the Council of States.
(5) If a Money Bill passed by the House of the People and transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations is not returned to the House of the People within the said period of fourteen days, it shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses at the expiration of the said period in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 109

धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
(2) After a Money Bill has been passed by the House of the People it shall be transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations and the Council of States shall within a period of fourteen days from the date of its receipt of the Bill return the Bill to the House of the People with its recommendations and the House of the People may thereupon either accept or reject all or any of the recommendations of the Council of States.
(3) If the House of the People accepts any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses with the amendments recommended by the Council of States and accepted by the House of the People.
(4) If the House of the People does not accept any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People without any of the amendments recommended by the Council of States.
(5) If a Money Bill passed by the House of the People and transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations is not returned to the House of the People within the said period of fourteen days, it shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses at the expiration of the said period in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 115

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Supplementary, Additional or Excess Grants'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 115.

Explanation: Article 115 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Supplementary, Additional or Excess Grants' under the Constitution of India.


Article 115

अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 115 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 115 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 115

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 115 (Supplementary, Additional or Excess Grants).

Output:
Article Article 115 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Supplementary, Additional or Excess Grants' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) The President shall —
(a) if the amount authorised by any law made in accordance with the provisions of article 114 to be expended for a particula.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 115

अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 115 ('अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 115 भारत के संविधान में 'अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) The President shall —
(a) if the amount authorised by any law made in accordance with the provisions of article 114 to be expended for a particula...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 115

Input:
Premise: (1) The President shall —
(a) if the amount authorised by any law made in accordance with the provisions of article 114 to be expended for a particular service for the current financial year is found to be insufficient for the purposes of that year or when a need has arisen during the current financial year for supplementary or additional expenditure upon some new service not contemplated in the annual financial statement for that year, or
(b) if any money has been spent on any service during a financial year in excess of the amount granted for that service and for that year,
cause to be laid before both the Houses of Parliament another statement showing the estimated amount of that expenditure or cause to be presented to the House of the People a demand for such excess, as the case may be.
(2) The provisions of articles 112, 113 and 114 shall have effect in relation to any such statement and expenditure or demand and also to any law to be made authorising the appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of India to meet such expenditure or the grant in respect of such demand as they have effect in relation to the annual financial statement and the expenditure mentioned therein or to a demand for a grant and the law to be made for the authorisation of appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of India to meet such expenditure or grant.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Supplementary, Additional or Excess Grants' under Article 115.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.