Article 19

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) All citizens shall have the right—
(a) to freedom of speech and expression;
(b) to assemble peaceably and without arms;
(c) to form associations or unions;
(d) to move freely throughout the territory of India;
(e) to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India;
(g) to practise any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business.
(2) Nothing in sub-clause (a) of clause (1) shall affect the operation of any existing law, or prevent the State from making any law, in so far as such law imposes reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence.
(3) Nothing in sub-clause (b) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India or public order, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause.
(4) Nothing in sub-clause (c) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the sovereignty andintegrity of India or public order or morality, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause.
(5) Nothing in sub-clauses (d) and (e) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of any of the rights conferred by the said sub-clauses either in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled Tribe.
(6) Nothing in sub-clause (g) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the general public, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause, and, in particular, nothing in the said sub-clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it relates to, or prevent the State from making any law relating to,—
(i) the professional or technical qualifications necessary for practising any profession or carrying on any occupation, trade or business, or
(ii) the carrying on by the State, or by a corporation owned or controlled by the State, of any trade, business, industry or service, whether to the exclusion, complete or partial, of citizens or otherwise.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'बोलने की स्वतंत्रता आदि के संबंध में कुछ अधिकारों का संरक्षण' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 19

Protection of Certain Rights Regarding Freedom of Speech, Etc

Input:
Premise: (1) All citizens shall have the right—
(a) to freedom of speech and expression;
(b) to assemble peaceably and without arms;
(c) to form associations or unions;
(d) to move freely throughout the territory of India;
(e) to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India;
(g) to practise any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business.
(2) Nothing in sub-clause (a) of clause (1) shall affect the operation of any existing law, or prevent the State from making any law, in so far as such law imposes reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence.
(3) Nothing in sub-clause (b) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India or public order, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause.
(4) Nothing in sub-clause (c) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the sovereignty andintegrity of India or public order or morality, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause.
(5) Nothing in sub-clauses (d) and (e) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of any of the rights conferred by the said sub-clauses either in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled Tribe.
(6) Nothing in sub-clause (g) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the general public, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause, and, in particular, nothing in the said sub-clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it relates to, or prevent the State from making any law relating to,—
(i) the professional or technical qualifications necessary for practising any profession or carrying on any occupation, trade or business, or
(ii) the carrying on by the State, or by a corporation owned or controlled by the State, of any trade, business, industry or service, whether to the exclusion, complete or partial, of citizens or otherwise.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 19

बोलने की स्वतंत्रता आदि के संबंध में कुछ अधिकारों का संरक्षण

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) All citizens shall have the right—
(a) to freedom of speech and expression;
(b) to assemble peaceably and without arms;
(c) to form associations or unions;
(d) to move freely throughout the territory of India;
(e) to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India;
(g) to practise any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business.
(2) Nothing in sub-clause (a) of clause (1) shall affect the operation of any existing law, or prevent the State from making any law, in so far as such law imposes reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence.
(3) Nothing in sub-clause (b) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India or public order, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause.
(4) Nothing in sub-clause (c) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the sovereignty andintegrity of India or public order or morality, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause.
(5) Nothing in sub-clauses (d) and (e) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of any of the rights conferred by the said sub-clauses either in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled Tribe.
(6) Nothing in sub-clause (g) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the general public, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause, and, in particular, nothing in the said sub-clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it relates to, or prevent the State from making any law relating to,—
(i) the professional or technical qualifications necessary for practising any profession or carrying on any occupation, trade or business, or
(ii) the carrying on by the State, or by a corporation owned or controlled by the State, of any trade, business, industry or service, whether to the exclusion, complete or partial, of citizens or otherwise.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 20

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 20 (Protection in Respect of Conviction for Offences).

Output: Article Article 20 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Protection in Respect of Conviction for Offences' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) No person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the Act charged as an offence,.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 20

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 20 ('अपराधों के लिए दोषसिद्धि के संबंध में संरक्षण') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 20 भारत के संविधान में 'अपराधों के लिए दोषसिद्धि के संबंध में संरक्षण' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) No person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the Act charged as an offence,...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 20

Input:
Premise: (1) No person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the Act charged as an offence, nor be subjected to a penalty greater than that which might have been inflicted under the law in force at the time of the commission of the offence.
(2) No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once.
(3) No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Protection in Respect of Conviction for Offences' under Article 20.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 20

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) No person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the Act charged as an offence, nor be subjected to a penalty greater than that which might have been inflicted under the law in force at the time of the commission of the offence.
(2) No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once.
(3) No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 20 के तहत 'अपराधों के लिए दोषसिद्धि के संबंध में संरक्षण' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 20

Input:
Premise: (1) No person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the Act charged as an offence, nor be subjected to a penalty greater than that which might have been inflicted under the law in force at the time of the commission of the offence.
(2) No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once.
(3) No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Protection in Respect of Conviction for Offences'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 20

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) No person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the Act charged as an offence, nor be subjected to a penalty greater than that which might have been inflicted under the law in force at the time of the commission of the offence.
(2) No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once.
(3) No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'अपराधों के लिए दोषसिद्धि के संबंध में संरक्षण' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 20

Input:
Premise: (1) No person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the Act charged as an offence, nor be subjected to a penalty greater than that which might have been inflicted under the law in force at the time of the commission of the offence.
(2) No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once.
(3) No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 20

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) No person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the Act charged as an offence, nor be subjected to a penalty greater than that which might have been inflicted under the law in force at the time of the commission of the offence.
(2) No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once.
(3) No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 21

Protection of Life and Personal Liberty

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 21 (Protection of Life and Personal Liberty).

Output: Article Article 21 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Protection of Life and Personal Liberty' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.. This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 21

जीवन और व्यक्तिगत स्वतंत्रता की सुरक्षा

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 21 ('जीवन और व्यक्तिगत स्वतंत्रता की सुरक्षा') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 21 भारत के संविधान में 'जीवन और व्यक्तिगत स्वतंत्रता की सुरक्षा' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 21

Protection of Life and Personal Liberty

Input:
Premise: No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Protection of Life and Personal Liberty' under Article 21.

Output: Entailment


Article 21

जीवन और व्यक्तिगत स्वतंत्रता की सुरक्षा

Input:
आधार (Premise): No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 21 के तहत 'जीवन और व्यक्तिगत स्वतंत्रता की सुरक्षा' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 21

Protection of Life and Personal Liberty

Input:
Premise: No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Protection of Life and Personal Liberty'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 21

जीवन और व्यक्तिगत स्वतंत्रता की सुरक्षा

Input:
आधार (Premise): No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'जीवन और व्यक्तिगत स्वतंत्रता की सुरक्षा' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 21

Protection of Life and Personal Liberty

Input:
Premise: No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 21

जीवन और व्यक्तिगत स्वतंत्रता की सुरक्षा

Input:
आधार (Premise): No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 23

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Prohibition of Traffic in Human Beings and Forced Labour'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 23.

Explanation: Article 23 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Prohibition of Traffic in Human Beings and Forced Labour' under the Constitution of India.


Article 23

मानव तस्करी और जबरन श्रम का निषेध

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'मानव तस्करी और जबरन श्रम का निषेध' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 23 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 23 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'मानव तस्करी और जबरन श्रम का निषेध' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 23

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 23 (Prohibition of Traffic in Human Beings and Forced Labour).

Output: Article Article 23 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Prohibition of Traffic in Human Beings and Forced Labour' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) Traffic in human beings and begar and other similar forms of forced labour are prohibited and any contravention of this provision shall be an offe.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 23

मानव तस्करी और जबरन श्रम का निषेध

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 23 ('मानव तस्करी और जबरन श्रम का निषेध') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 23 भारत के संविधान में 'मानव तस्करी और जबरन श्रम का निषेध' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) Traffic in human beings and begar and other similar forms of forced labour are prohibited and any contravention of this provision shall be an offe...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 23

Input:
Premise: (1) Traffic in human beings and begar and other similar forms of forced labour are prohibited and any contravention of this provision shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.
(2) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from imposing compulsory service for public purposes, and in imposing such service the State shall not make any discrimination on grounds only of religion, race, caste or class or any of them

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Prohibition of Traffic in Human Beings and Forced Labour' under Article 23.

Output: Entailment


Article 23

मानव तस्करी और जबरन श्रम का निषेध

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Traffic in human beings and begar and other similar forms of forced labour are prohibited and any contravention of this provision shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.
(2) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from imposing compulsory service for public purposes, and in imposing such service the State shall not make any discrimination on grounds only of religion, race, caste or class or any of them

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 23 के तहत 'मानव तस्करी और जबरन श्रम का निषेध' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 23

Input:
Premise: (1) Traffic in human beings and begar and other similar forms of forced labour are prohibited and any contravention of this provision shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.
(2) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from imposing compulsory service for public purposes, and in imposing such service the State shall not make any discrimination on grounds only of religion, race, caste or class or any of them

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Prohibition of Traffic in Human Beings and Forced Labour'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 23

मानव तस्करी और जबरन श्रम का निषेध

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Traffic in human beings and begar and other similar forms of forced labour are prohibited and any contravention of this provision shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.
(2) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from imposing compulsory service for public purposes, and in imposing such service the State shall not make any discrimination on grounds only of religion, race, caste or class or any of them

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'मानव तस्करी और जबरन श्रम का निषेध' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 23

Input:
Premise: (1) Traffic in human beings and begar and other similar forms of forced labour are prohibited and any contravention of this provision shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.
(2) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from imposing compulsory service for public purposes, and in imposing such service the State shall not make any discrimination on grounds only of religion, race, caste or class or any of them

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 23

मानव तस्करी और जबरन श्रम का निषेध

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Traffic in human beings and begar and other similar forms of forced labour are prohibited and any contravention of this provision shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.
(2) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from imposing compulsory service for public purposes, and in imposing such service the State shall not make any discrimination on grounds only of religion, race, caste or class or any of them

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 24

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 24 (Prohibition of Employment of Children in Factories, Etc).

Output: Article Article 24 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Prohibition of Employment of Children in Factories, Etc' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: No child below the age of fourteen years shall be employed to work in any factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous employment. This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 24

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 24 ('कारखानों आदि में बच्चों के रोजगार पर प्रतिबंध') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 24 भारत के संविधान में 'कारखानों आदि में बच्चों के रोजगार पर प्रतिबंध' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: No child below the age of fourteen years shall be employed to work in any factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous employment। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 24

Input:
Premise: No child below the age of fourteen years shall be employed to work in any factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous employment

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Prohibition of Employment of Children in Factories, Etc' under Article 24.

Output: Entailment


Article 24

Input:
आधार (Premise): No child below the age of fourteen years shall be employed to work in any factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous employment

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 24 के तहत 'कारखानों आदि में बच्चों के रोजगार पर प्रतिबंध' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 24

Input:
Premise: No child below the age of fourteen years shall be employed to work in any factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous employment

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Prohibition of Employment of Children in Factories, Etc'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 24

Input:
आधार (Premise): No child below the age of fourteen years shall be employed to work in any factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous employment

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'कारखानों आदि में बच्चों के रोजगार पर प्रतिबंध' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 24

Input:
Premise: No child below the age of fourteen years shall be employed to work in any factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous employment

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 24

Input:
आधार (Premise): No child below the age of fourteen years shall be employed to work in any factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous employment

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 25

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 25 (Freedom of Conscience and Free Profession, Practice and Propagation of Religion).

Output: Article Article 25 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Freedom of Conscience and Free Profession, Practice and Propagation of Religion' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) Subject to public order, morality and health and to the other provisions of this Part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience a.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 25

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 25 ('अंतरात्मा की स्वतंत्रता और धर्म का स्वतंत्र व्यवसाय, अभ्यास और प्रचार') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 25 भारत के संविधान में 'अंतरात्मा की स्वतंत्रता और धर्म का स्वतंत्र व्यवसाय, अभ्यास और प्रचार' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) Subject to public order, morality and health and to the other provisions of this Part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience a...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 25

Input:
Premise: (1) Subject to public order, morality and health and to the other provisions of this Part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion.
(2) Nothing in this article shall affect the operation of any existing law or prevent the State from making any law—
(a) regulating or restricting any economic, financial, political or other secular activity which may be associated with religious practice;
(b) providing for social welfare and reform or the throwing open of Hindu religious institutions of a public character to all classes and sections of Hindus.
Explanation I.—The wearing and carrying of kirpans shall be deemed to be included in the profession of the Sikh religion.
Explanation II.—In sub-clause (b) of clause (2), the reference to Hindus shall be construed as including a reference to persons professing the Sikh, Jaina or Buddhist religion, and the reference to Hindu religious institutions shall be construed accordingly.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Freedom of Conscience and Free Profession, Practice and Propagation of Religion' under Article 25.

Output: Entailment


Article 25

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Subject to public order, morality and health and to the other provisions of this Part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion.
(2) Nothing in this article shall affect the operation of any existing law or prevent the State from making any law—
(a) regulating or restricting any economic, financial, political or other secular activity which may be associated with religious practice;
(b) providing for social welfare and reform or the throwing open of Hindu religious institutions of a public character to all classes and sections of Hindus.
Explanation I.—The wearing and carrying of kirpans shall be deemed to be included in the profession of the Sikh religion.
Explanation II.—In sub-clause (b) of clause (2), the reference to Hindus shall be construed as including a reference to persons professing the Sikh, Jaina or Buddhist religion, and the reference to Hindu religious institutions shall be construed accordingly.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 25 के तहत 'अंतरात्मा की स्वतंत्रता और धर्म का स्वतंत्र व्यवसाय, अभ्यास और प्रचार' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 25

Input:
Premise: (1) Subject to public order, morality and health and to the other provisions of this Part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion.
(2) Nothing in this article shall affect the operation of any existing law or prevent the State from making any law—
(a) regulating or restricting any economic, financial, political or other secular activity which may be associated with religious practice;
(b) providing for social welfare and reform or the throwing open of Hindu religious institutions of a public character to all classes and sections of Hindus.
Explanation I.—The wearing and carrying of kirpans shall be deemed to be included in the profession of the Sikh religion.
Explanation II.—In sub-clause (b) of clause (2), the reference to Hindus shall be construed as including a reference to persons professing the Sikh, Jaina or Buddhist religion, and the reference to Hindu religious institutions shall be construed accordingly.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Freedom of Conscience and Free Profession, Practice and Propagation of Religion'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 25

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Subject to public order, morality and health and to the other provisions of this Part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion.
(2) Nothing in this article shall affect the operation of any existing law or prevent the State from making any law—
(a) regulating or restricting any economic, financial, political or other secular activity which may be associated with religious practice;
(b) providing for social welfare and reform or the throwing open of Hindu religious institutions of a public character to all classes and sections of Hindus.
Explanation I.—The wearing and carrying of kirpans shall be deemed to be included in the profession of the Sikh religion.
Explanation II.—In sub-clause (b) of clause (2), the reference to Hindus shall be construed as including a reference to persons professing the Sikh, Jaina or Buddhist religion, and the reference to Hindu religious institutions shall be construed accordingly.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'अंतरात्मा की स्वतंत्रता और धर्म का स्वतंत्र व्यवसाय, अभ्यास और प्रचार' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 25

Input:
Premise: (1) Subject to public order, morality and health and to the other provisions of this Part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion.
(2) Nothing in this article shall affect the operation of any existing law or prevent the State from making any law—
(a) regulating or restricting any economic, financial, political or other secular activity which may be associated with religious practice;
(b) providing for social welfare and reform or the throwing open of Hindu religious institutions of a public character to all classes and sections of Hindus.
Explanation I.—The wearing and carrying of kirpans shall be deemed to be included in the profession of the Sikh religion.
Explanation II.—In sub-clause (b) of clause (2), the reference to Hindus shall be construed as including a reference to persons professing the Sikh, Jaina or Buddhist religion, and the reference to Hindu religious institutions shall be construed accordingly.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 25

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Subject to public order, morality and health and to the other provisions of this Part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion.
(2) Nothing in this article shall affect the operation of any existing law or prevent the State from making any law—
(a) regulating or restricting any economic, financial, political or other secular activity which may be associated with religious practice;
(b) providing for social welfare and reform or the throwing open of Hindu religious institutions of a public character to all classes and sections of Hindus.
Explanation I.—The wearing and carrying of kirpans shall be deemed to be included in the profession of the Sikh religion.
Explanation II.—In sub-clause (b) of clause (2), the reference to Hindus shall be construed as including a reference to persons professing the Sikh, Jaina or Buddhist religion, and the reference to Hindu religious institutions shall be construed accordingly.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 26

Freedom to Manage Religious Affairs

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Freedom to Manage Religious Affairs'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 26.

Explanation: Article 26 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Freedom to Manage Religious Affairs' under the Constitution of India.


Article 26

धार्मिक मामलों के प्रबंधन की स्वतंत्रता

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'धार्मिक मामलों के प्रबंधन की स्वतंत्रता' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 26 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 26 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'धार्मिक मामलों के प्रबंधन की स्वतंत्रता' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 26

Freedom to Manage Religious Affairs

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 26 (Freedom to Manage Religious Affairs).

Output:
Article Article 26 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Freedom to Manage Religious Affairs' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Subject to public order, morality and health, every religious denomination or any section thereof shall have the right—
(a) to establish and maintain .... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 26

धार्मिक मामलों के प्रबंधन की स्वतंत्रता

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 26 ('धार्मिक मामलों के प्रबंधन की स्वतंत्रता') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 26 भारत के संविधान में 'धार्मिक मामलों के प्रबंधन की स्वतंत्रता' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Subject to public order, morality and health, every religious denomination or any section thereof shall have the right—
(a) to establish and maintain ...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 26

Freedom to Manage Religious Affairs

Input:
Premise: Subject to public order, morality and health, every religious denomination or any section thereof shall have the right—
(a) to establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable purposes;
(b) to manage its own affairs in matters of religion;
(c) to own and acquire movable and immovable property; and
(d) to administer such property in accordance with law.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Freedom to Manage Religious Affairs' under Article 26.

Output: Entailment


Article 26

धार्मिक मामलों के प्रबंधन की स्वतंत्रता

Input:
आधार (Premise): Subject to public order, morality and health, every religious denomination or any section thereof shall have the right—
(a) to establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable purposes;
(b) to manage its own affairs in matters of religion;
(c) to own and acquire movable and immovable property; and
(d) to administer such property in accordance with law.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 26 के तहत 'धार्मिक मामलों के प्रबंधन की स्वतंत्रता' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 26

Freedom to Manage Religious Affairs

Input:
Premise: Subject to public order, morality and health, every religious denomination or any section thereof shall have the right—
(a) to establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable purposes;
(b) to manage its own affairs in matters of religion;
(c) to own and acquire movable and immovable property; and
(d) to administer such property in accordance with law.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Freedom to Manage Religious Affairs'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 26

धार्मिक मामलों के प्रबंधन की स्वतंत्रता

Input:
आधार (Premise): Subject to public order, morality and health, every religious denomination or any section thereof shall have the right—
(a) to establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable purposes;
(b) to manage its own affairs in matters of religion;
(c) to own and acquire movable and immovable property; and
(d) to administer such property in accordance with law.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'धार्मिक मामलों के प्रबंधन की स्वतंत्रता' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 26

Freedom to Manage Religious Affairs

Input:
Premise: Subject to public order, morality and health, every religious denomination or any section thereof shall have the right—
(a) to establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable purposes;
(b) to manage its own affairs in matters of religion;
(c) to own and acquire movable and immovable property; and
(d) to administer such property in accordance with law.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 26

धार्मिक मामलों के प्रबंधन की स्वतंत्रता

Input:
आधार (Premise): Subject to public order, morality and health, every religious denomination or any section thereof shall have the right—
(a) to establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable purposes;
(b) to manage its own affairs in matters of religion;
(c) to own and acquire movable and immovable property; and
(d) to administer such property in accordance with law.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 27

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Freedom as to Payment of Taxes for Promotion of Any Particular Religion'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 27.

Explanation: Article 27 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Freedom as to Payment of Taxes for Promotion of Any Particular Religion' under the Constitution of India.


Article 27

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'किसी विशेष धर्म के प्रचार के लिए करों के भुगतान के संबंध में स्वतंत्रता' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 27 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 27 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'किसी विशेष धर्म के प्रचार के लिए करों के भुगतान के संबंध में स्वतंत्रता' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 27

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 27 (Freedom as to Payment of Taxes for Promotion of Any Particular Religion).

Output: Article Article 27 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Freedom as to Payment of Taxes for Promotion of Any Particular Religion' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: No person shall be compelled to pay any taxes, the proceeds of which are specifically appropriated in payment of expenses for the promotion or mainten.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 27

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 27 ('किसी विशेष धर्म के प्रचार के लिए करों के भुगतान के संबंध में स्वतंत्रता') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 27 भारत के संविधान में 'किसी विशेष धर्म के प्रचार के लिए करों के भुगतान के संबंध में स्वतंत्रता' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: No person shall be compelled to pay any taxes, the proceeds of which are specifically appropriated in payment of expenses for the promotion or mainten...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 27

Input:
Premise: No person shall be compelled to pay any taxes, the proceeds of which are specifically appropriated in payment of expenses for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Freedom as to Payment of Taxes for Promotion of Any Particular Religion' under Article 27.

Output: Entailment


Article 27

Input:
आधार (Premise): No person shall be compelled to pay any taxes, the proceeds of which are specifically appropriated in payment of expenses for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 27 के तहत 'किसी विशेष धर्म के प्रचार के लिए करों के भुगतान के संबंध में स्वतंत्रता' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 27

Input:
Premise: No person shall be compelled to pay any taxes, the proceeds of which are specifically appropriated in payment of expenses for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Freedom as to Payment of Taxes for Promotion of Any Particular Religion'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 27

Input:
आधार (Premise): No person shall be compelled to pay any taxes, the proceeds of which are specifically appropriated in payment of expenses for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'किसी विशेष धर्म के प्रचार के लिए करों के भुगतान के संबंध में स्वतंत्रता' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 27

Input:
Premise: No person shall be compelled to pay any taxes, the proceeds of which are specifically appropriated in payment of expenses for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 27

Input:
आधार (Premise): No person shall be compelled to pay any taxes, the proceeds of which are specifically appropriated in payment of expenses for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 28

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Freedom as to Attendance at Religious Instruction or Religious Worship in Certain Educational Institutions'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 28.

Explanation: Article 28 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Freedom as to Attendance at Religious Instruction or Religious Worship in Certain Educational Institutions' under the Constitution of India.


Article 28

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'कुछ शैक्षणिक संस्थानों में धार्मिक निर्देश या धार्मिक पूजा में उपस्थिति के संबंध में स्वतंत्रता' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 28 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 28 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'कुछ शैक्षणिक संस्थानों में धार्मिक निर्देश या धार्मिक पूजा में उपस्थिति के संबंध में स्वतंत्रता' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 28

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 28 (Freedom as to Attendance at Religious Instruction or Religious Worship in Certain Educational Institutions).

Output:
Article Article 28 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Freedom as to Attendance at Religious Instruction or Religious Worship in Certain Educational Institutions' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) No religious instruction shall be provided in any educational institution wholly maintained out of State funds.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall ap.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 28

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 28 ('कुछ शैक्षणिक संस्थानों में धार्मिक निर्देश या धार्मिक पूजा में उपस्थिति के संबंध में स्वतंत्रता') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 28 भारत के संविधान में 'कुछ शैक्षणिक संस्थानों में धार्मिक निर्देश या धार्मिक पूजा में उपस्थिति के संबंध में स्वतंत्रता' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) No religious instruction shall be provided in any educational institution wholly maintained out of State funds.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall ap...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 28

Input:
Premise: (1) No religious instruction shall be provided in any educational institution wholly maintained out of State funds.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall apply to an educational institution which is administered by the State but has been established under any endowment or trust which requires that religious instruction shall be imparted in such institution.
(3) No person attending any educational institution recognised by the State or receiving aid out of State funds shall be required to take part in any religious instruction that may be imparted in such institution or to attend any religious worship that may be conducted in such institution or in any premises attached thereto unless such person or, if such person is a minor, his guardian has given his consent thereto.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Freedom as to Attendance at Religious Instruction or Religious Worship in Certain Educational Institutions' under Article 28.

Output: Entailment


Article 28

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) No religious instruction shall be provided in any educational institution wholly maintained out of State funds.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall apply to an educational institution which is administered by the State but has been established under any endowment or trust which requires that religious instruction shall be imparted in such institution.
(3) No person attending any educational institution recognised by the State or receiving aid out of State funds shall be required to take part in any religious instruction that may be imparted in such institution or to attend any religious worship that may be conducted in such institution or in any premises attached thereto unless such person or, if such person is a minor, his guardian has given his consent thereto.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 28 के तहत 'कुछ शैक्षणिक संस्थानों में धार्मिक निर्देश या धार्मिक पूजा में उपस्थिति के संबंध में स्वतंत्रता' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 28

Input:
Premise: (1) No religious instruction shall be provided in any educational institution wholly maintained out of State funds.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall apply to an educational institution which is administered by the State but has been established under any endowment or trust which requires that religious instruction shall be imparted in such institution.
(3) No person attending any educational institution recognised by the State or receiving aid out of State funds shall be required to take part in any religious instruction that may be imparted in such institution or to attend any religious worship that may be conducted in such institution or in any premises attached thereto unless such person or, if such person is a minor, his guardian has given his consent thereto.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Freedom as to Attendance at Religious Instruction or Religious Worship in Certain Educational Institutions'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 28

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) No religious instruction shall be provided in any educational institution wholly maintained out of State funds.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall apply to an educational institution which is administered by the State but has been established under any endowment or trust which requires that religious instruction shall be imparted in such institution.
(3) No person attending any educational institution recognised by the State or receiving aid out of State funds shall be required to take part in any religious instruction that may be imparted in such institution or to attend any religious worship that may be conducted in such institution or in any premises attached thereto unless such person or, if such person is a minor, his guardian has given his consent thereto.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'कुछ शैक्षणिक संस्थानों में धार्मिक निर्देश या धार्मिक पूजा में उपस्थिति के संबंध में स्वतंत्रता' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 28

Input:
Premise: (1) No religious instruction shall be provided in any educational institution wholly maintained out of State funds.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall apply to an educational institution which is administered by the State but has been established under any endowment or trust which requires that religious instruction shall be imparted in such institution.
(3) No person attending any educational institution recognised by the State or receiving aid out of State funds shall be required to take part in any religious instruction that may be imparted in such institution or to attend any religious worship that may be conducted in such institution or in any premises attached thereto unless such person or, if such person is a minor, his guardian has given his consent thereto.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 28

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) No religious instruction shall be provided in any educational institution wholly maintained out of State funds.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall apply to an educational institution which is administered by the State but has been established under any endowment or trust which requires that religious instruction shall be imparted in such institution.
(3) No person attending any educational institution recognised by the State or receiving aid out of State funds shall be required to take part in any religious instruction that may be imparted in such institution or to attend any religious worship that may be conducted in such institution or in any premises attached thereto unless such person or, if such person is a minor, his guardian has given his consent thereto.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 29

Protection of Interests of Minorities

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Protection of Interests of Minorities'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 29.

Explanation: Article 29 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Protection of Interests of Minorities' under the Constitution of India.


Article 29

अल्पसंख्यकों के हितों की सुरक्षा

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'अल्पसंख्यकों के हितों की सुरक्षा' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 29 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 29 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'अल्पसंख्यकों के हितों की सुरक्षा' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 29

Protection of Interests of Minorities

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 29 (Protection of Interests of Minorities).

Output: Article Article 29 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Protection of Interests of Minorities' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) Any section of the citizens residing in the territory of India or any part thereof having a distinct language, script or culture of its own shall .... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 29

अल्पसंख्यकों के हितों की सुरक्षा

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 29 ('अल्पसंख्यकों के हितों की सुरक्षा') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 29 भारत के संविधान में 'अल्पसंख्यकों के हितों की सुरक्षा' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) Any section of the citizens residing in the territory of India or any part thereof having a distinct language, script or culture of its own shall ...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 29

Protection of Interests of Minorities

Input:
Premise: (1) Any section of the citizens residing in the territory of India or any part thereof having a distinct language, script or culture of its own shall have the right to conserve the same.
(2) No citizen shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by the State or receiving aid out of State funds on grounds only of religion, race, caste, language or any of them.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Protection of Interests of Minorities' under Article 29.

Output: Entailment


Article 29

अल्पसंख्यकों के हितों की सुरक्षा

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Any section of the citizens residing in the territory of India or any part thereof having a distinct language, script or culture of its own shall have the right to conserve the same.
(2) No citizen shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by the State or receiving aid out of State funds on grounds only of religion, race, caste, language or any of them.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 29 के तहत 'अल्पसंख्यकों के हितों की सुरक्षा' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 29

Protection of Interests of Minorities

Input:
Premise: (1) Any section of the citizens residing in the territory of India or any part thereof having a distinct language, script or culture of its own shall have the right to conserve the same.
(2) No citizen shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by the State or receiving aid out of State funds on grounds only of religion, race, caste, language or any of them.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Protection of Interests of Minorities'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 29

अल्पसंख्यकों के हितों की सुरक्षा

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Any section of the citizens residing in the territory of India or any part thereof having a distinct language, script or culture of its own shall have the right to conserve the same.
(2) No citizen shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by the State or receiving aid out of State funds on grounds only of religion, race, caste, language or any of them.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'अल्पसंख्यकों के हितों की सुरक्षा' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 29

Protection of Interests of Minorities

Input:
Premise: (1) Any section of the citizens residing in the territory of India or any part thereof having a distinct language, script or culture of its own shall have the right to conserve the same.
(2) No citizen shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by the State or receiving aid out of State funds on grounds only of religion, race, caste, language or any of them.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 29

अल्पसंख्यकों के हितों की सुरक्षा

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Any section of the citizens residing in the territory of India or any part thereof having a distinct language, script or culture of its own shall have the right to conserve the same.
(2) No citizen shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by the State or receiving aid out of State funds on grounds only of religion, race, caste, language or any of them.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 30

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Right of Minorities to Establish and Administer Educational Institutions'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 30.

Explanation: Article 30 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Right of Minorities to Establish and Administer Educational Institutions' under the Constitution of India.


Article 30

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'शैक्षणिक संस्थानों की स्थापना और प्रशासन करने का अल्पसंख्यकों का अधिकार' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 30 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 30 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'शैक्षणिक संस्थानों की स्थापना और प्रशासन करने का अल्पसंख्यकों का अधिकार' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 30

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 30 (Right of Minorities to Establish and Administer Educational Institutions).

Output:
Article Article 30 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Right of Minorities to Establish and Administer Educational Institutions' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) All minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 30

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 30 ('शैक्षणिक संस्थानों की स्थापना और प्रशासन करने का अल्पसंख्यकों का अधिकार') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 30 भारत के संविधान में 'शैक्षणिक संस्थानों की स्थापना और प्रशासन करने का अल्पसंख्यकों का अधिकार' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) All minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 30

Input:
Premise: (1) All minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
(1A) In making any law providing for the compulsory acquisition of any property of an educational institution established and administered by a minority referred to in clause (1), the State shall ensure that the amount fixed by or determined under such law for the acquisition of such property is such as would not restrict or abrogate the right guaranteed under that clause.
(2) The State shall not, in granting aid to educational institutions, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, whether based on religion or language.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Right of Minorities to Establish and Administer Educational Institutions' under Article 30.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 30

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) All minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
(1A) In making any law providing for the compulsory acquisition of any property of an educational institution established and administered by a minority referred to in clause (1), the State shall ensure that the amount fixed by or determined under such law for the acquisition of such property is such as would not restrict or abrogate the right guaranteed under that clause.
(2) The State shall not, in granting aid to educational institutions, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, whether based on religion or language.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 30 के तहत 'शैक्षणिक संस्थानों की स्थापना और प्रशासन करने का अल्पसंख्यकों का अधिकार' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 30

Input:
Premise: (1) All minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
(1A) In making any law providing for the compulsory acquisition of any property of an educational institution established and administered by a minority referred to in clause (1), the State shall ensure that the amount fixed by or determined under such law for the acquisition of such property is such as would not restrict or abrogate the right guaranteed under that clause.
(2) The State shall not, in granting aid to educational institutions, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, whether based on religion or language.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Right of Minorities to Establish and Administer Educational Institutions'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 30

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) All minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
(1A) In making any law providing for the compulsory acquisition of any property of an educational institution established and administered by a minority referred to in clause (1), the State shall ensure that the amount fixed by or determined under such law for the acquisition of such property is such as would not restrict or abrogate the right guaranteed under that clause.
(2) The State shall not, in granting aid to educational institutions, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, whether based on religion or language.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'शैक्षणिक संस्थानों की स्थापना और प्रशासन करने का अल्पसंख्यकों का अधिकार' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 30

Input:
Premise: (1) All minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
(1A) In making any law providing for the compulsory acquisition of any property of an educational institution established and administered by a minority referred to in clause (1), the State shall ensure that the amount fixed by or determined under such law for the acquisition of such property is such as would not restrict or abrogate the right guaranteed under that clause.
(2) The State shall not, in granting aid to educational institutions, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, whether based on religion or language.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 30

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) All minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
(1A) In making any law providing for the compulsory acquisition of any property of an educational institution established and administered by a minority referred to in clause (1), the State shall ensure that the amount fixed by or determined under such law for the acquisition of such property is such as would not restrict or abrogate the right guaranteed under that clause.
(2) The State shall not, in granting aid to educational institutions, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, whether based on religion or language.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 31

Compulsory Acquisition of Property

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Compulsory Acquisition of Property'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 31.

Explanation: Article 31 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Compulsory Acquisition of Property' under the Constitution of India.


Article 31

संपत्ति का अनिवार्य अधिग्रहण

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'संपत्ति का अनिवार्य अधिग्रहण' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 31 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 31 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'संपत्ति का अनिवार्य अधिग्रहण' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 31

Compulsory Acquisition of Property

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 31 (Compulsory Acquisition of Property).

Output: Article Article 31 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Compulsory Acquisition of Property' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Compulsory acquisition of property. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 6 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).. This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 31

संपत्ति का अनिवार्य अधिग्रहण

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 31 ('संपत्ति का अनिवार्य अधिग्रहण') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 31 भारत के संविधान में 'संपत्ति का अनिवार्य अधिग्रहण' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Compulsory acquisition of property. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 6 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 31

Compulsory Acquisition of Property

Input:
Premise: Compulsory acquisition of property. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 6 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Compulsory Acquisition of Property' under Article 31.

Output: Entailment


Article 31

संपत्ति का अनिवार्य अधिग्रहण

Input:
आधार (Premise): Compulsory acquisition of property. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 6 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 31 के तहत 'संपत्ति का अनिवार्य अधिग्रहण' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 31

Compulsory Acquisition of Property

Input:
Premise: Compulsory acquisition of property. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 6 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Compulsory Acquisition of Property'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 31

संपत्ति का अनिवार्य अधिग्रहण

Input:
आधार (Premise): Compulsory acquisition of property. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 6 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'संपत्ति का अनिवार्य अधिग्रहण' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 31

Compulsory Acquisition of Property

Input:
Premise: Compulsory acquisition of property. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 6 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 31

संपत्ति का अनिवार्य अधिग्रहण

Input:
आधार (Premise): Compulsory acquisition of property. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 6 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 31A

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Saving of Laws Providing for Acquisition of Estates, Etc'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 31A.

Explanation: Article 31A specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Saving of Laws Providing for Acquisition of Estates, Etc' under the Constitution of India.


Article 31A

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'सम्पदा आदि के अधिग्रहण हेतु प्रावधान करने वाले कानूनों की बचत' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 31A की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 31A विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'सम्पदा आदि के अधिग्रहण हेतु प्रावधान करने वाले कानूनों की बचत' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 31A

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 31A (Saving of Laws Providing for Acquisition of Estates, Etc).

Output:
Article Article 31A establishes the fundamental framework for 'Saving of Laws Providing for Acquisition of Estates, Etc' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 31A

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 31A ('सम्पदा आदि के अधिग्रहण हेतु प्रावधान करने वाले कानूनों की बचत') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 31A भारत के संविधान में 'सम्पदा आदि के अधिग्रहण हेतु प्रावधान करने वाले कानूनों की बचत' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 31A

Input:
Premise: (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or the extinguishment or modification of any such rights, or
(b) the taking over of the management of any property by the State for a limited period either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of the property, or
(c) the amalgamation of two or more corporations either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of any of the corporations, or
(d) the extinguishment or modification of any rights of managing agents, secretaries and treasurers, managing directors, directors or managers of corporations, or of any voting rights of shareholders thereof, or
(e) the extinguishment or modification of any rights accruing by virtue of any agreement, lease or licence for the purpose of searching for, or winning, any mineral or mineral oil, or the premature termination or cancellation of any such agreement, lease or licence,
shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19:
Provided that where such law is a law made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent:
Provided further that where any law makes any provision for the acquisition by the State of any estate and where any land comprised therein is held by a person under his personal cultivation, it shall not be lawful for the State to acquire any portion of such land as is within the ceiling limit applicable to him under any law for the time being in force or any building or structure standing thereon or appurtenant thereto, unless the law relating to the acquisition of such land, building or structure, provides for payment of compensation at a rate which shall not be less than the market value thereof.
(2) In this article,—
(a) the expression ''estate'' shall, in relation to any local area, have the same meaning as that expression or its local equivalent has in the existing law relating to land tenures in force in that area and shall also include—
(i) any jagir, inam or muafi or other similar grant and in the States of Tamil Nadu and Kerala, any janmam right;
(ii) any land held under ryotwari settlement;
(iii) any land held or let for purposes of agriculture or for purposes ancillary thereto, including waste land, forest land, land for pasture or sites of buildings and other structures occupied by cultivators of land, agricultural labourers and village artisans;
(b) the expression ''rights'', in relation to an estate, shall include any rights vesting in a proprietor, subproprietor, under-proprietor, tenure-holder, raiyat, under-raiyat or other intermediary and any rights or privileges in respect of land revenue.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Saving of Laws Providing for Acquisition of Estates, Etc' under Article 31A.

Output: Entailment


Article 31A

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or the extinguishment or modification of any such rights, or
(b) the taking over of the management of any property by the State for a limited period either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of the property, or
(c) the amalgamation of two or more corporations either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of any of the corporations, or
(d) the extinguishment or modification of any rights of managing agents, secretaries and treasurers, managing directors, directors or managers of corporations, or of any voting rights of shareholders thereof, or
(e) the extinguishment or modification of any rights accruing by virtue of any agreement, lease or licence for the purpose of searching for, or winning, any mineral or mineral oil, or the premature termination or cancellation of any such agreement, lease or licence,
shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19:
Provided that where such law is a law made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent:
Provided further that where any law makes any provision for the acquisition by the State of any estate and where any land comprised therein is held by a person under his personal cultivation, it shall not be lawful for the State to acquire any portion of such land as is within the ceiling limit applicable to him under any law for the time being in force or any building or structure standing thereon or appurtenant thereto, unless the law relating to the acquisition of such land, building or structure, provides for payment of compensation at a rate which shall not be less than the market value thereof.
(2) In this article,—
(a) the expression ''estate'' shall, in relation to any local area, have the same meaning as that expression or its local equivalent has in the existing law relating to land tenures in force in that area and shall also include—
(i) any jagir, inam or muafi or other similar grant and in the States of Tamil Nadu and Kerala, any janmam right;
(ii) any land held under ryotwari settlement;
(iii) any land held or let for purposes of agriculture or for purposes ancillary thereto, including waste land, forest land, land for pasture or sites of buildings and other structures occupied by cultivators of land, agricultural labourers and village artisans;
(b) the expression ''rights'', in relation to an estate, shall include any rights vesting in a proprietor, subproprietor, under-proprietor, tenure-holder, raiyat, under-raiyat or other intermediary and any rights or privileges in respect of land revenue.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 31A के तहत 'सम्पदा आदि के अधिग्रहण हेतु प्रावधान करने वाले कानूनों की बचत' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 31A

Input:
Premise: (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or the extinguishment or modification of any such rights, or
(b) the taking over of the management of any property by the State for a limited period either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of the property, or
(c) the amalgamation of two or more corporations either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of any of the corporations, or
(d) the extinguishment or modification of any rights of managing agents, secretaries and treasurers, managing directors, directors or managers of corporations, or of any voting rights of shareholders thereof, or
(e) the extinguishment or modification of any rights accruing by virtue of any agreement, lease or licence for the purpose of searching for, or winning, any mineral or mineral oil, or the premature termination or cancellation of any such agreement, lease or licence,
shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19:
Provided that where such law is a law made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent:
Provided further that where any law makes any provision for the acquisition by the State of any estate and where any land comprised therein is held by a person under his personal cultivation, it shall not be lawful for the State to acquire any portion of such land as is within the ceiling limit applicable to him under any law for the time being in force or any building or structure standing thereon or appurtenant thereto, unless the law relating to the acquisition of such land, building or structure, provides for payment of compensation at a rate which shall not be less than the market value thereof.
(2) In this article,—
(a) the expression ''estate'' shall, in relation to any local area, have the same meaning as that expression or its local equivalent has in the existing law relating to land tenures in force in that area and shall also include—
(i) any jagir, inam or muafi or other similar grant and in the States of Tamil Nadu and Kerala, any janmam right;
(ii) any land held under ryotwari settlement;
(iii) any land held or let for purposes of agriculture or for purposes ancillary thereto, including waste land, forest land, land for pasture or sites of buildings and other structures occupied by cultivators of land, agricultural labourers and village artisans;
(b) the expression ''rights'', in relation to an estate, shall include any rights vesting in a proprietor, subproprietor, under-proprietor, tenure-holder, raiyat, under-raiyat or other intermediary and any rights or privileges in respect of land revenue.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Saving of Laws Providing for Acquisition of Estates, Etc'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 31A

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or the extinguishment or modification of any such rights, or
(b) the taking over of the management of any property by the State for a limited period either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of the property, or
(c) the amalgamation of two or more corporations either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of any of the corporations, or
(d) the extinguishment or modification of any rights of managing agents, secretaries and treasurers, managing directors, directors or managers of corporations, or of any voting rights of shareholders thereof, or
(e) the extinguishment or modification of any rights accruing by virtue of any agreement, lease or licence for the purpose of searching for, or winning, any mineral or mineral oil, or the premature termination or cancellation of any such agreement, lease or licence,
shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19:
Provided that where such law is a law made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent:
Provided further that where any law makes any provision for the acquisition by the State of any estate and where any land comprised therein is held by a person under his personal cultivation, it shall not be lawful for the State to acquire any portion of such land as is within the ceiling limit applicable to him under any law for the time being in force or any building or structure standing thereon or appurtenant thereto, unless the law relating to the acquisition of such land, building or structure, provides for payment of compensation at a rate which shall not be less than the market value thereof.
(2) In this article,—
(a) the expression ''estate'' shall, in relation to any local area, have the same meaning as that expression or its local equivalent has in the existing law relating to land tenures in force in that area and shall also include—
(i) any jagir, inam or muafi or other similar grant and in the States of Tamil Nadu and Kerala, any janmam right;
(ii) any land held under ryotwari settlement;
(iii) any land held or let for purposes of agriculture or for purposes ancillary thereto, including waste land, forest land, land for pasture or sites of buildings and other structures occupied by cultivators of land, agricultural labourers and village artisans;
(b) the expression ''rights'', in relation to an estate, shall include any rights vesting in a proprietor, subproprietor, under-proprietor, tenure-holder, raiyat, under-raiyat or other intermediary and any rights or privileges in respect of land revenue.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'सम्पदा आदि के अधिग्रहण हेतु प्रावधान करने वाले कानूनों की बचत' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 31A

Input:
Premise: (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or the extinguishment or modification of any such rights, or
(b) the taking over of the management of any property by the State for a limited period either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of the property, or
(c) the amalgamation of two or more corporations either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of any of the corporations, or
(d) the extinguishment or modification of any rights of managing agents, secretaries and treasurers, managing directors, directors or managers of corporations, or of any voting rights of shareholders thereof, or
(e) the extinguishment or modification of any rights accruing by virtue of any agreement, lease or licence for the purpose of searching for, or winning, any mineral or mineral oil, or the premature termination or cancellation of any such agreement, lease or licence,
shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19:
Provided that where such law is a law made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent:
Provided further that where any law makes any provision for the acquisition by the State of any estate and where any land comprised therein is held by a person under his personal cultivation, it shall not be lawful for the State to acquire any portion of such land as is within the ceiling limit applicable to him under any law for the time being in force or any building or structure standing thereon or appurtenant thereto, unless the law relating to the acquisition of such land, building or structure, provides for payment of compensation at a rate which shall not be less than the market value thereof.
(2) In this article,—
(a) the expression ''estate'' shall, in relation to any local area, have the same meaning as that expression or its local equivalent has in the existing law relating to land tenures in force in that area and shall also include—
(i) any jagir, inam or muafi or other similar grant and in the States of Tamil Nadu and Kerala, any janmam right;
(ii) any land held under ryotwari settlement;
(iii) any land held or let for purposes of agriculture or for purposes ancillary thereto, including waste land, forest land, land for pasture or sites of buildings and other structures occupied by cultivators of land, agricultural labourers and village artisans;
(b) the expression ''rights'', in relation to an estate, shall include any rights vesting in a proprietor, subproprietor, under-proprietor, tenure-holder, raiyat, under-raiyat or other intermediary and any rights or privileges in respect of land revenue.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 31A

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or the extinguishment or modification of any such rights, or
(b) the taking over of the management of any property by the State for a limited period either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of the property, or
(c) the amalgamation of two or more corporations either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of any of the corporations, or
(d) the extinguishment or modification of any rights of managing agents, secretaries and treasurers, managing directors, directors or managers of corporations, or of any voting rights of shareholders thereof, or
(e) the extinguishment or modification of any rights accruing by virtue of any agreement, lease or licence for the purpose of searching for, or winning, any mineral or mineral oil, or the premature termination or cancellation of any such agreement, lease or licence,
shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19:
Provided that where such law is a law made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent:
Provided further that where any law makes any provision for the acquisition by the State of any estate and where any land comprised therein is held by a person under his personal cultivation, it shall not be lawful for the State to acquire any portion of such land as is within the ceiling limit applicable to him under any law for the time being in force or any building or structure standing thereon or appurtenant thereto, unless the law relating to the acquisition of such land, building or structure, provides for payment of compensation at a rate which shall not be less than the market value thereof.
(2) In this article,—
(a) the expression ''estate'' shall, in relation to any local area, have the same meaning as that expression or its local equivalent has in the existing law relating to land tenures in force in that area and shall also include—
(i) any jagir, inam or muafi or other similar grant and in the States of Tamil Nadu and Kerala, any janmam right;
(ii) any land held under ryotwari settlement;
(iii) any land held or let for purposes of agriculture or for purposes ancillary thereto, including waste land, forest land, land for pasture or sites of buildings and other structures occupied by cultivators of land, agricultural labourers and village artisans;
(b) the expression ''rights'', in relation to an estate, shall include any rights vesting in a proprietor, subproprietor, under-proprietor, tenure-holder, raiyat, under-raiyat or other intermediary and any rights or privileges in respect of land revenue.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 31B

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Validation of Certain Acts and Regulations'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 31B.

Explanation: Article 31B specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Validation of Certain Acts and Regulations' under the Constitution of India.


Article 31B

कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 31B की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 31B विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 31B

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 31B (Validation of Certain Acts and Regulations).

Output: Article Article 31B establishes the fundamental framework for 'Validation of Certain Acts and Regulations' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in article 31A, none of the Acts and Regulations specified in the Ninth Schedule nor a.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.