Article 288

Input:
Premise: (1) Save in so far as the President may by order otherwise provide, no law of a State in force immediately before the commencement of this Constitution shall impose, or authorise the imposition of, a tax in respect of any water or electricity stored, generated, consumed, distributed or sold by any authority established by any existing law or any law made by Parliament for regulating or developing any inter-State river or river-valley.
Explanation. — The expression “law of a State in force” in this clause shall include a law of a State passed or made before the commencement of this Constitution and not previously repealed, notwithstanding that it or parts of it may not be then in operation either at all or in particular areas.
(2) The Legislature of a State may by law impose, or authorise the imposition of, any such tax as is mentioned in clause (1), but no such law shall have any effect unless it has, after having been reserved for the consideration of the President, received his assent; and if any such law provides for the fixation of the rates and other incidents of such tax by means of rules or orders to be made under the law by any authority, the law shall provide for the previous consent of the President being obtained to the making of any such rule or order.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 288

कुछ मामलों में पानी या बिजली के संबंध में राज्यों द्वारा कराधान से छूट

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Save in so far as the President may by order otherwise provide, no law of a State in force immediately before the commencement of this Constitution shall impose, or authorise the imposition of, a tax in respect of any water or electricity stored, generated, consumed, distributed or sold by any authority established by any existing law or any law made by Parliament for regulating or developing any inter-State river or river-valley.
Explanation. — The expression “law of a State in force” in this clause shall include a law of a State passed or made before the commencement of this Constitution and not previously repealed, notwithstanding that it or parts of it may not be then in operation either at all or in particular areas.
(2) The Legislature of a State may by law impose, or authorise the imposition of, any such tax as is mentioned in clause (1), but no such law shall have any effect unless it has, after having been reserved for the consideration of the President, received his assent; and if any such law provides for the fixation of the rates and other incidents of such tax by means of rules or orders to be made under the law by any authority, the law shall provide for the previous consent of the President being obtained to the making of any such rule or order.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 289

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Exemption of Property and Income of a State from Union Taxation'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 289.

Explanation: Article 289 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Exemption of Property and Income of a State from Union Taxation' under the Constitution of India.


Article 289

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'किसी राज्य की संपत्ति और आय को संघ कराधान से छूट' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 289 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 289 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'किसी राज्य की संपत्ति और आय को संघ कराधान से छूट' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 289

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 289 (Exemption of Property and Income of a State from Union Taxation).

Output:
Article Article 289 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Exemption of Property and Income of a State from Union Taxation' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) The property and income of a State shall be exempt from Union taxation.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall prevent the Union from imposing, or author.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 289

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 289 ('किसी राज्य की संपत्ति और आय को संघ कराधान से छूट') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 289 भारत के संविधान में 'किसी राज्य की संपत्ति और आय को संघ कराधान से छूट' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) The property and income of a State shall be exempt from Union taxation.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall prevent the Union from imposing, or author...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 289

Input:
Premise: (1) The property and income of a State shall be exempt from Union taxation.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall prevent the Union from imposing, or authorising the imposition of, any tax to such extent, if any, as Parliament may by law provide in respect of a trade or business of any kind carried on by, or on behalf of, the Government of a State, or any operations connected therewith, or any property used or occupied for the purposes of such trade or business, or any income accruing or arising in connection therewith.
(3) Nothing in clause (2) shall apply to any trade or business, or to any class of trade or business, which Parliament may by law declare to be incidental to the ordinary functions of Government.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Exemption of Property and Income of a State from Union Taxation' under Article 289.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 289

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The property and income of a State shall be exempt from Union taxation.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall prevent the Union from imposing, or authorising the imposition of, any tax to such extent, if any, as Parliament may by law provide in respect of a trade or business of any kind carried on by, or on behalf of, the Government of a State, or any operations connected therewith, or any property used or occupied for the purposes of such trade or business, or any income accruing or arising in connection therewith.
(3) Nothing in clause (2) shall apply to any trade or business, or to any class of trade or business, which Parliament may by law declare to be incidental to the ordinary functions of Government.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 289 के तहत 'किसी राज्य की संपत्ति और आय को संघ कराधान से छूट' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 289

Input:
Premise: (1) The property and income of a State shall be exempt from Union taxation.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall prevent the Union from imposing, or authorising the imposition of, any tax to such extent, if any, as Parliament may by law provide in respect of a trade or business of any kind carried on by, or on behalf of, the Government of a State, or any operations connected therewith, or any property used or occupied for the purposes of such trade or business, or any income accruing or arising in connection therewith.
(3) Nothing in clause (2) shall apply to any trade or business, or to any class of trade or business, which Parliament may by law declare to be incidental to the ordinary functions of Government.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Exemption of Property and Income of a State from Union Taxation'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 289

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The property and income of a State shall be exempt from Union taxation.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall prevent the Union from imposing, or authorising the imposition of, any tax to such extent, if any, as Parliament may by law provide in respect of a trade or business of any kind carried on by, or on behalf of, the Government of a State, or any operations connected therewith, or any property used or occupied for the purposes of such trade or business, or any income accruing or arising in connection therewith.
(3) Nothing in clause (2) shall apply to any trade or business, or to any class of trade or business, which Parliament may by law declare to be incidental to the ordinary functions of Government.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'किसी राज्य की संपत्ति और आय को संघ कराधान से छूट' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 289

Input:
Premise: (1) The property and income of a State shall be exempt from Union taxation.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall prevent the Union from imposing, or authorising the imposition of, any tax to such extent, if any, as Parliament may by law provide in respect of a trade or business of any kind carried on by, or on behalf of, the Government of a State, or any operations connected therewith, or any property used or occupied for the purposes of such trade or business, or any income accruing or arising in connection therewith.
(3) Nothing in clause (2) shall apply to any trade or business, or to any class of trade or business, which Parliament may by law declare to be incidental to the ordinary functions of Government.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 289

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The property and income of a State shall be exempt from Union taxation.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall prevent the Union from imposing, or authorising the imposition of, any tax to such extent, if any, as Parliament may by law provide in respect of a trade or business of any kind carried on by, or on behalf of, the Government of a State, or any operations connected therewith, or any property used or occupied for the purposes of such trade or business, or any income accruing or arising in connection therewith.
(3) Nothing in clause (2) shall apply to any trade or business, or to any class of trade or business, which Parliament may by law declare to be incidental to the ordinary functions of Government.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 290

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Adjustment in Respect of Certain Expenses and Pensions'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 290.

Explanation: Article 290 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Adjustment in Respect of Certain Expenses and Pensions' under the Constitution of India.


Article 290

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'कुछ खर्चों और पेंशन के संबंध में समायोजन' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 290 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 290 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'कुछ खर्चों और पेंशन के संबंध में समायोजन' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 290

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 290 (Adjustment in Respect of Certain Expenses and Pensions).

Output: Article Article 290 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Adjustment in Respect of Certain Expenses and Pensions' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Where under the provisions of this Constitution the expenses of any court or Commission, or the pension payable to or in respect of a person who has s.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 290

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 290 ('कुछ खर्चों और पेंशन के संबंध में समायोजन') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 290 भारत के संविधान में 'कुछ खर्चों और पेंशन के संबंध में समायोजन' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Where under the provisions of this Constitution the expenses of any court or Commission, or the pension payable to or in respect of a person who has s...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 290

Input:
Premise: Where under the provisions of this Constitution the expenses of any court or Commission, or the pension payable to or in respect of a person who has served before the commencement of this Constitution under the Crown in India or after such commencement in connection with the affairs of the Union or of a State, are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India or the Consolidated Fund of a State, then, if —
(a) in the case of a charge on the Consolidated Fund of India, the court or Commission serves any of the separate needs of a State, or the person has served wholly or in part in connection with the affairs of a State; or
(b) in the case of a charge on the Consolidated Fund of a State, the court or Commission serves any of the separate needs of the Union or another State, or the person has served wholly or in part in connection with the affairs of the Union or another State,
there shall be charged on and paid out of the Consolidated Fund of the State or, as the case may be, the Consolidated Fund of India or the Consolidated Fund of the other State, such contribution in respect of the expenses or pension as may be agreed, or as may in default of agreement be determined by an arbitrator to be appointed by the Chief Justice of India.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Adjustment in Respect of Certain Expenses and Pensions' under Article 290.

Output: Entailment


Article 290

Input:
आधार (Premise): Where under the provisions of this Constitution the expenses of any court or Commission, or the pension payable to or in respect of a person who has served before the commencement of this Constitution under the Crown in India or after such commencement in connection with the affairs of the Union or of a State, are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India or the Consolidated Fund of a State, then, if —
(a) in the case of a charge on the Consolidated Fund of India, the court or Commission serves any of the separate needs of a State, or the person has served wholly or in part in connection with the affairs of a State; or
(b) in the case of a charge on the Consolidated Fund of a State, the court or Commission serves any of the separate needs of the Union or another State, or the person has served wholly or in part in connection with the affairs of the Union or another State,
there shall be charged on and paid out of the Consolidated Fund of the State or, as the case may be, the Consolidated Fund of India or the Consolidated Fund of the other State, such contribution in respect of the expenses or pension as may be agreed, or as may in default of agreement be determined by an arbitrator to be appointed by the Chief Justice of India.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 290 के तहत 'कुछ खर्चों और पेंशन के संबंध में समायोजन' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 290

Input:
Premise: Where under the provisions of this Constitution the expenses of any court or Commission, or the pension payable to or in respect of a person who has served before the commencement of this Constitution under the Crown in India or after such commencement in connection with the affairs of the Union or of a State, are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India or the Consolidated Fund of a State, then, if —
(a) in the case of a charge on the Consolidated Fund of India, the court or Commission serves any of the separate needs of a State, or the person has served wholly or in part in connection with the affairs of a State; or
(b) in the case of a charge on the Consolidated Fund of a State, the court or Commission serves any of the separate needs of the Union or another State, or the person has served wholly or in part in connection with the affairs of the Union or another State,
there shall be charged on and paid out of the Consolidated Fund of the State or, as the case may be, the Consolidated Fund of India or the Consolidated Fund of the other State, such contribution in respect of the expenses or pension as may be agreed, or as may in default of agreement be determined by an arbitrator to be appointed by the Chief Justice of India.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Adjustment in Respect of Certain Expenses and Pensions'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 290

Input:
आधार (Premise): Where under the provisions of this Constitution the expenses of any court or Commission, or the pension payable to or in respect of a person who has served before the commencement of this Constitution under the Crown in India or after such commencement in connection with the affairs of the Union or of a State, are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India or the Consolidated Fund of a State, then, if —
(a) in the case of a charge on the Consolidated Fund of India, the court or Commission serves any of the separate needs of a State, or the person has served wholly or in part in connection with the affairs of a State; or
(b) in the case of a charge on the Consolidated Fund of a State, the court or Commission serves any of the separate needs of the Union or another State, or the person has served wholly or in part in connection with the affairs of the Union or another State,
there shall be charged on and paid out of the Consolidated Fund of the State or, as the case may be, the Consolidated Fund of India or the Consolidated Fund of the other State, such contribution in respect of the expenses or pension as may be agreed, or as may in default of agreement be determined by an arbitrator to be appointed by the Chief Justice of India.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'कुछ खर्चों और पेंशन के संबंध में समायोजन' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 290

Input:
Premise: Where under the provisions of this Constitution the expenses of any court or Commission, or the pension payable to or in respect of a person who has served before the commencement of this Constitution under the Crown in India or after such commencement in connection with the affairs of the Union or of a State, are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India or the Consolidated Fund of a State, then, if —
(a) in the case of a charge on the Consolidated Fund of India, the court or Commission serves any of the separate needs of a State, or the person has served wholly or in part in connection with the affairs of a State; or
(b) in the case of a charge on the Consolidated Fund of a State, the court or Commission serves any of the separate needs of the Union or another State, or the person has served wholly or in part in connection with the affairs of the Union or another State,
there shall be charged on and paid out of the Consolidated Fund of the State or, as the case may be, the Consolidated Fund of India or the Consolidated Fund of the other State, such contribution in respect of the expenses or pension as may be agreed, or as may in default of agreement be determined by an arbitrator to be appointed by the Chief Justice of India.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 290

Input:
आधार (Premise): Where under the provisions of this Constitution the expenses of any court or Commission, or the pension payable to or in respect of a person who has served before the commencement of this Constitution under the Crown in India or after such commencement in connection with the affairs of the Union or of a State, are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India or the Consolidated Fund of a State, then, if —
(a) in the case of a charge on the Consolidated Fund of India, the court or Commission serves any of the separate needs of a State, or the person has served wholly or in part in connection with the affairs of a State; or
(b) in the case of a charge on the Consolidated Fund of a State, the court or Commission serves any of the separate needs of the Union or another State, or the person has served wholly or in part in connection with the affairs of the Union or another State,
there shall be charged on and paid out of the Consolidated Fund of the State or, as the case may be, the Consolidated Fund of India or the Consolidated Fund of the other State, such contribution in respect of the expenses or pension as may be agreed, or as may in default of agreement be determined by an arbitrator to be appointed by the Chief Justice of India.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 290A

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Annual Payment to Certain Devaswom Funds'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 290A.

Explanation: Article 290A specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Annual Payment to Certain Devaswom Funds' under the Constitution of India.


Article 290A

कुछ देवास्वोम फंडों को वार्षिक भुगतान

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'कुछ देवास्वोम फंडों को वार्षिक भुगतान' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 290A की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 290A विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'कुछ देवास्वोम फंडों को वार्षिक भुगतान' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 290A

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 290A (Annual Payment to Certain Devaswom Funds).

Output: Article Article 290A establishes the fundamental framework for 'Annual Payment to Certain Devaswom Funds' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: A sum of forty-six lakhs and fifty thousand rupees shall be charged on, and paid out of, the Consolidated Fund of the State of Kerala every year to th.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 290A

कुछ देवास्वोम फंडों को वार्षिक भुगतान

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 290A ('कुछ देवास्वोम फंडों को वार्षिक भुगतान') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 290A भारत के संविधान में 'कुछ देवास्वोम फंडों को वार्षिक भुगतान' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: A sum of forty-six lakhs and fifty thousand rupees shall be charged on, and paid out of, the Consolidated Fund of the State of Kerala every year to th...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 290A

Input:
Premise: A sum of forty-six lakhs and fifty thousand rupees shall be charged on, and paid out of, the Consolidated Fund of the State of Kerala every year to the Travancore Devaswom Fund; and a sum of thirteen lakhs and fifty thousand rupees shall be charged on, and paid out of, the Consolidated Fund of the State of Tamil Nadu every year to the Devaswom Fund established in that State for the maintenance of Hindu temples and shrines in the territories transferred to that State on the 1st day of November, 1956, from the State of Travancore-Cochin.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Annual Payment to Certain Devaswom Funds' under Article 290A.

Output: Entailment


Article 290A

कुछ देवास्वोम फंडों को वार्षिक भुगतान

Input:
आधार (Premise): A sum of forty-six lakhs and fifty thousand rupees shall be charged on, and paid out of, the Consolidated Fund of the State of Kerala every year to the Travancore Devaswom Fund; and a sum of thirteen lakhs and fifty thousand rupees shall be charged on, and paid out of, the Consolidated Fund of the State of Tamil Nadu every year to the Devaswom Fund established in that State for the maintenance of Hindu temples and shrines in the territories transferred to that State on the 1st day of November, 1956, from the State of Travancore-Cochin.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 290A के तहत 'कुछ देवास्वोम फंडों को वार्षिक भुगतान' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 290A

Input:
Premise: A sum of forty-six lakhs and fifty thousand rupees shall be charged on, and paid out of, the Consolidated Fund of the State of Kerala every year to the Travancore Devaswom Fund; and a sum of thirteen lakhs and fifty thousand rupees shall be charged on, and paid out of, the Consolidated Fund of the State of Tamil Nadu every year to the Devaswom Fund established in that State for the maintenance of Hindu temples and shrines in the territories transferred to that State on the 1st day of November, 1956, from the State of Travancore-Cochin.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Annual Payment to Certain Devaswom Funds'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 290A

कुछ देवास्वोम फंडों को वार्षिक भुगतान

Input:
आधार (Premise): A sum of forty-six lakhs and fifty thousand rupees shall be charged on, and paid out of, the Consolidated Fund of the State of Kerala every year to the Travancore Devaswom Fund; and a sum of thirteen lakhs and fifty thousand rupees shall be charged on, and paid out of, the Consolidated Fund of the State of Tamil Nadu every year to the Devaswom Fund established in that State for the maintenance of Hindu temples and shrines in the territories transferred to that State on the 1st day of November, 1956, from the State of Travancore-Cochin.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'कुछ देवास्वोम फंडों को वार्षिक भुगतान' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 290A

Input:
Premise: A sum of forty-six lakhs and fifty thousand rupees shall be charged on, and paid out of, the Consolidated Fund of the State of Kerala every year to the Travancore Devaswom Fund; and a sum of thirteen lakhs and fifty thousand rupees shall be charged on, and paid out of, the Consolidated Fund of the State of Tamil Nadu every year to the Devaswom Fund established in that State for the maintenance of Hindu temples and shrines in the territories transferred to that State on the 1st day of November, 1956, from the State of Travancore-Cochin.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 290A

कुछ देवास्वोम फंडों को वार्षिक भुगतान

Input:
आधार (Premise): A sum of forty-six lakhs and fifty thousand rupees shall be charged on, and paid out of, the Consolidated Fund of the State of Kerala every year to the Travancore Devaswom Fund; and a sum of thirteen lakhs and fifty thousand rupees shall be charged on, and paid out of, the Consolidated Fund of the State of Tamil Nadu every year to the Devaswom Fund established in that State for the maintenance of Hindu temples and shrines in the territories transferred to that State on the 1st day of November, 1956, from the State of Travancore-Cochin.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 292

Borrowing by the Government of India

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Borrowing by the Government of India'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 292.

Explanation: Article 292 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Borrowing by the Government of India' under the Constitution of India.


Article 292

भारत सरकार द्वारा उधार

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'भारत सरकार द्वारा उधार' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 292 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 292 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'भारत सरकार द्वारा उधार' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 292

Borrowing by the Government of India

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 292 (Borrowing by the Government of India).

Output: Article Article 292 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Borrowing by the Government of India' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: The executive power of the Union extends to borrowing upon the security of the Consolidated Fund of India within such limits, if any, as may from time.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 292

भारत सरकार द्वारा उधार

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 292 ('भारत सरकार द्वारा उधार') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 292 भारत के संविधान में 'भारत सरकार द्वारा उधार' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: The executive power of the Union extends to borrowing upon the security of the Consolidated Fund of India within such limits, if any, as may from time...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 292

Borrowing by the Government of India

Input:
Premise: The executive power of the Union extends to borrowing upon the security of the Consolidated Fund of India within such limits, if any, as may from time to time be fixed by Parliament by law and to the giving of guarantees within such limits, if any, as may be so fixed.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Borrowing by the Government of India' under Article 292.

Output: Entailment


Article 292

भारत सरकार द्वारा उधार

Input:
आधार (Premise): The executive power of the Union extends to borrowing upon the security of the Consolidated Fund of India within such limits, if any, as may from time to time be fixed by Parliament by law and to the giving of guarantees within such limits, if any, as may be so fixed.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 292 के तहत 'भारत सरकार द्वारा उधार' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 292

Borrowing by the Government of India

Input:
Premise: The executive power of the Union extends to borrowing upon the security of the Consolidated Fund of India within such limits, if any, as may from time to time be fixed by Parliament by law and to the giving of guarantees within such limits, if any, as may be so fixed.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Borrowing by the Government of India'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 292

भारत सरकार द्वारा उधार

Input:
आधार (Premise): The executive power of the Union extends to borrowing upon the security of the Consolidated Fund of India within such limits, if any, as may from time to time be fixed by Parliament by law and to the giving of guarantees within such limits, if any, as may be so fixed.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'भारत सरकार द्वारा उधार' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 292

Borrowing by the Government of India

Input:
Premise: The executive power of the Union extends to borrowing upon the security of the Consolidated Fund of India within such limits, if any, as may from time to time be fixed by Parliament by law and to the giving of guarantees within such limits, if any, as may be so fixed.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 292

भारत सरकार द्वारा उधार

Input:
आधार (Premise): The executive power of the Union extends to borrowing upon the security of the Consolidated Fund of India within such limits, if any, as may from time to time be fixed by Parliament by law and to the giving of guarantees within such limits, if any, as may be so fixed.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 294

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Succession to Property, Assets, Rights, Liabilities and Obligations in Certain Cases'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 294.

Explanation: Article 294 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Succession to Property, Assets, Rights, Liabilities and Obligations in Certain Cases' under the Constitution of India.


Article 294

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'कुछ मामलों में संपत्ति, परिसंपत्तियों, अधिकारों, देनदारियों और दायित्वों का उत्तराधिकार' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 294 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 294 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'कुछ मामलों में संपत्ति, परिसंपत्तियों, अधिकारों, देनदारियों और दायित्वों का उत्तराधिकार' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 294

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 294 (Succession to Property, Assets, Rights, Liabilities and Obligations in Certain Cases).

Output:
Article Article 294 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Succession to Property, Assets, Rights, Liabilities and Obligations in Certain Cases' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: As from the commencement of this Constitution —
(a) all property and assets which immediately before such commencement were vested in His Majesty for .... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 294

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 294 ('कुछ मामलों में संपत्ति, परिसंपत्तियों, अधिकारों, देनदारियों और दायित्वों का उत्तराधिकार') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 294 भारत के संविधान में 'कुछ मामलों में संपत्ति, परिसंपत्तियों, अधिकारों, देनदारियों और दायित्वों का उत्तराधिकार' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: As from the commencement of this Constitution —
(a) all property and assets which immediately before such commencement were vested in His Majesty for ...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 294

Input:
Premise: As from the commencement of this Constitution —
(a) all property and assets which immediately before such commencement were vested in His Majesty for the purposes of the Government of the Dominion of India and all property and assets which immediately before such commencement were vested in His Majesty for the purposes of the Government of each Governor’s Province shall vest respectively in the Union and the corresponding State, and
(b) all rights, liabilities and obligations of the Government of the Dominion of India and of the Government of each Governor’s Province, whether arising out of any contract or otherwise, shall be the rights, liabilities and obligations respectively of the Government of India and the Government of each corresponding State,
subject to any adjustment made or to be made by reason of the creation before the commencement of this Constitution of the Dominion of Pakistan or of the Provinces of West Bengal, East Bengal, West Punjab and East Punjab.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Succession to Property, Assets, Rights, Liabilities and Obligations in Certain Cases' under Article 294.

Output: Entailment


Article 294

Input:
आधार (Premise): As from the commencement of this Constitution —
(a) all property and assets which immediately before such commencement were vested in His Majesty for the purposes of the Government of the Dominion of India and all property and assets which immediately before such commencement were vested in His Majesty for the purposes of the Government of each Governor’s Province shall vest respectively in the Union and the corresponding State, and
(b) all rights, liabilities and obligations of the Government of the Dominion of India and of the Government of each Governor’s Province, whether arising out of any contract or otherwise, shall be the rights, liabilities and obligations respectively of the Government of India and the Government of each corresponding State,
subject to any adjustment made or to be made by reason of the creation before the commencement of this Constitution of the Dominion of Pakistan or of the Provinces of West Bengal, East Bengal, West Punjab and East Punjab.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 294 के तहत 'कुछ मामलों में संपत्ति, परिसंपत्तियों, अधिकारों, देनदारियों और दायित्वों का उत्तराधिकार' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 294

Input:
Premise: As from the commencement of this Constitution —
(a) all property and assets which immediately before such commencement were vested in His Majesty for the purposes of the Government of the Dominion of India and all property and assets which immediately before such commencement were vested in His Majesty for the purposes of the Government of each Governor’s Province shall vest respectively in the Union and the corresponding State, and
(b) all rights, liabilities and obligations of the Government of the Dominion of India and of the Government of each Governor’s Province, whether arising out of any contract or otherwise, shall be the rights, liabilities and obligations respectively of the Government of India and the Government of each corresponding State,
subject to any adjustment made or to be made by reason of the creation before the commencement of this Constitution of the Dominion of Pakistan or of the Provinces of West Bengal, East Bengal, West Punjab and East Punjab.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Succession to Property, Assets, Rights, Liabilities and Obligations in Certain Cases'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 294

Input:
आधार (Premise): As from the commencement of this Constitution —
(a) all property and assets which immediately before such commencement were vested in His Majesty for the purposes of the Government of the Dominion of India and all property and assets which immediately before such commencement were vested in His Majesty for the purposes of the Government of each Governor’s Province shall vest respectively in the Union and the corresponding State, and
(b) all rights, liabilities and obligations of the Government of the Dominion of India and of the Government of each Governor’s Province, whether arising out of any contract or otherwise, shall be the rights, liabilities and obligations respectively of the Government of India and the Government of each corresponding State,
subject to any adjustment made or to be made by reason of the creation before the commencement of this Constitution of the Dominion of Pakistan or of the Provinces of West Bengal, East Bengal, West Punjab and East Punjab.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'कुछ मामलों में संपत्ति, परिसंपत्तियों, अधिकारों, देनदारियों और दायित्वों का उत्तराधिकार' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 294

Input:
Premise: As from the commencement of this Constitution —
(a) all property and assets which immediately before such commencement were vested in His Majesty for the purposes of the Government of the Dominion of India and all property and assets which immediately before such commencement were vested in His Majesty for the purposes of the Government of each Governor’s Province shall vest respectively in the Union and the corresponding State, and
(b) all rights, liabilities and obligations of the Government of the Dominion of India and of the Government of each Governor’s Province, whether arising out of any contract or otherwise, shall be the rights, liabilities and obligations respectively of the Government of India and the Government of each corresponding State,
subject to any adjustment made or to be made by reason of the creation before the commencement of this Constitution of the Dominion of Pakistan or of the Provinces of West Bengal, East Bengal, West Punjab and East Punjab.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 294

Input:
आधार (Premise): As from the commencement of this Constitution —
(a) all property and assets which immediately before such commencement were vested in His Majesty for the purposes of the Government of the Dominion of India and all property and assets which immediately before such commencement were vested in His Majesty for the purposes of the Government of each Governor’s Province shall vest respectively in the Union and the corresponding State, and
(b) all rights, liabilities and obligations of the Government of the Dominion of India and of the Government of each Governor’s Province, whether arising out of any contract or otherwise, shall be the rights, liabilities and obligations respectively of the Government of India and the Government of each corresponding State,
subject to any adjustment made or to be made by reason of the creation before the commencement of this Constitution of the Dominion of Pakistan or of the Provinces of West Bengal, East Bengal, West Punjab and East Punjab.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 297

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Things of Value Within Territorial Waters or Continental Shelf and Resources of the Exclusive Economic Zone to Vest in the Union'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 297.

Explanation: Article 297 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Things of Value Within Territorial Waters or Continental Shelf and Resources of the Exclusive Economic Zone to Vest in the Union' under the Constitution of India.


Article 297

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'प्रादेशिक जल या महाद्वीपीय शेल्फ के भीतर मूल्य की चीजें और विशेष आर्थिक क्षेत्र के संसाधनों को संघ में निहित करना' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 297 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 297 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'प्रादेशिक जल या महाद्वीपीय शेल्फ के भीतर मूल्य की चीजें और विशेष आर्थिक क्षेत्र के संसाधनों को संघ में निहित करना' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 297

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 297 (Things of Value Within Territorial Waters or Continental Shelf and Resources of the Exclusive Economic Zone to Vest in the Union).

Output: Article Article 297 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Things of Value Within Territorial Waters or Continental Shelf and Resources of the Exclusive Economic Zone to Vest in the Union' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) All lands, minerals and other things of value underlying the ocean within the territorial waters, or the continental shelf, or the exclusive econo.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 297

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 297 ('प्रादेशिक जल या महाद्वीपीय शेल्फ के भीतर मूल्य की चीजें और विशेष आर्थिक क्षेत्र के संसाधनों को संघ में निहित करना') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 297 भारत के संविधान में 'प्रादेशिक जल या महाद्वीपीय शेल्फ के भीतर मूल्य की चीजें और विशेष आर्थिक क्षेत्र के संसाधनों को संघ में निहित करना' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) All lands, minerals and other things of value underlying the ocean within the territorial waters, or the continental shelf, or the exclusive econo...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 297

Input:
Premise: (1) All lands, minerals and other things of value underlying the ocean within the territorial waters, or the continental shelf, or the exclusive economic zone, of India shall vest in the Union and be held for the purposes of the Union.
(2) All other resources of the exclusive economic zone of India shall also vest in the Union and be held for the purposes of the Union.
(3) The limits of the territorial waters, the continental shelf, the exclusive economic zone, and other maritime zones, of India shall be such as may be specified, from time to time, by or under any law made by Parliament.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Things of Value Within Territorial Waters or Continental Shelf and Resources of the Exclusive Economic Zone to Vest in the Union' under Article 297.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 297

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) All lands, minerals and other things of value underlying the ocean within the territorial waters, or the continental shelf, or the exclusive economic zone, of India shall vest in the Union and be held for the purposes of the Union.
(2) All other resources of the exclusive economic zone of India shall also vest in the Union and be held for the purposes of the Union.
(3) The limits of the territorial waters, the continental shelf, the exclusive economic zone, and other maritime zones, of India shall be such as may be specified, from time to time, by or under any law made by Parliament.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 297 के तहत 'प्रादेशिक जल या महाद्वीपीय शेल्फ के भीतर मूल्य की चीजें और विशेष आर्थिक क्षेत्र के संसाधनों को संघ में निहित करना' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 297

Input:
Premise: (1) All lands, minerals and other things of value underlying the ocean within the territorial waters, or the continental shelf, or the exclusive economic zone, of India shall vest in the Union and be held for the purposes of the Union.
(2) All other resources of the exclusive economic zone of India shall also vest in the Union and be held for the purposes of the Union.
(3) The limits of the territorial waters, the continental shelf, the exclusive economic zone, and other maritime zones, of India shall be such as may be specified, from time to time, by or under any law made by Parliament.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Things of Value Within Territorial Waters or Continental Shelf and Resources of the Exclusive Economic Zone to Vest in the Union'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 297

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) All lands, minerals and other things of value underlying the ocean within the territorial waters, or the continental shelf, or the exclusive economic zone, of India shall vest in the Union and be held for the purposes of the Union.
(2) All other resources of the exclusive economic zone of India shall also vest in the Union and be held for the purposes of the Union.
(3) The limits of the territorial waters, the continental shelf, the exclusive economic zone, and other maritime zones, of India shall be such as may be specified, from time to time, by or under any law made by Parliament.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'प्रादेशिक जल या महाद्वीपीय शेल्फ के भीतर मूल्य की चीजें और विशेष आर्थिक क्षेत्र के संसाधनों को संघ में निहित करना' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 297

Input:
Premise: (1) All lands, minerals and other things of value underlying the ocean within the territorial waters, or the continental shelf, or the exclusive economic zone, of India shall vest in the Union and be held for the purposes of the Union.
(2) All other resources of the exclusive economic zone of India shall also vest in the Union and be held for the purposes of the Union.
(3) The limits of the territorial waters, the continental shelf, the exclusive economic zone, and other maritime zones, of India shall be such as may be specified, from time to time, by or under any law made by Parliament.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 297

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) All lands, minerals and other things of value underlying the ocean within the territorial waters, or the continental shelf, or the exclusive economic zone, of India shall vest in the Union and be held for the purposes of the Union.
(2) All other resources of the exclusive economic zone of India shall also vest in the Union and be held for the purposes of the Union.
(3) The limits of the territorial waters, the continental shelf, the exclusive economic zone, and other maritime zones, of India shall be such as may be specified, from time to time, by or under any law made by Parliament.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 298

Power to Carry on Trade, Etc

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Power to Carry on Trade, Etc'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 298.

Explanation: Article 298 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Power to Carry on Trade, Etc' under the Constitution of India.


Article 298

व्यापार आदि जारी रखने की शक्ति

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'व्यापार आदि जारी रखने की शक्ति' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 298 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 298 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'व्यापार आदि जारी रखने की शक्ति' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 298

Power to Carry on Trade, Etc

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 298 (Power to Carry on Trade, Etc).

Output: Article Article 298 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Power to Carry on Trade, Etc' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: The executive power of the Union and of each State shall extend to the carrying on of any trade or business and to the acquisition, holding and dispos.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 298

व्यापार आदि जारी रखने की शक्ति

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 298 ('व्यापार आदि जारी रखने की शक्ति') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 298 भारत के संविधान में 'व्यापार आदि जारी रखने की शक्ति' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: The executive power of the Union and of each State shall extend to the carrying on of any trade or business and to the acquisition, holding and dispos...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 298

Power to Carry on Trade, Etc

Input:
Premise: The executive power of the Union and of each State shall extend to the carrying on of any trade or business and to the acquisition, holding and disposal of property and the making of contracts for any purpose: Provided that —
(a) the said executive power of the Union shall, in so far as such trade or business or such purpose is not one with respect to which Parliament may make laws, be subject in each State to legislation by the State; and
(b) the said executive power of each State shall, in so far as such trade or business or such purpose is not one with respect to which the State Legislature may make laws, be subject to legislation by Parliament.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Power to Carry on Trade, Etc' under Article 298.

Output: Entailment


Article 298

व्यापार आदि जारी रखने की शक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): The executive power of the Union and of each State shall extend to the carrying on of any trade or business and to the acquisition, holding and disposal of property and the making of contracts for any purpose: Provided that —
(a) the said executive power of the Union shall, in so far as such trade or business or such purpose is not one with respect to which Parliament may make laws, be subject in each State to legislation by the State; and
(b) the said executive power of each State shall, in so far as such trade or business or such purpose is not one with respect to which the State Legislature may make laws, be subject to legislation by Parliament.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 298 के तहत 'व्यापार आदि जारी रखने की शक्ति' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 298

Power to Carry on Trade, Etc

Input:
Premise: The executive power of the Union and of each State shall extend to the carrying on of any trade or business and to the acquisition, holding and disposal of property and the making of contracts for any purpose: Provided that —
(a) the said executive power of the Union shall, in so far as such trade or business or such purpose is not one with respect to which Parliament may make laws, be subject in each State to legislation by the State; and
(b) the said executive power of each State shall, in so far as such trade or business or such purpose is not one with respect to which the State Legislature may make laws, be subject to legislation by Parliament.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Power to Carry on Trade, Etc'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 298

व्यापार आदि जारी रखने की शक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): The executive power of the Union and of each State shall extend to the carrying on of any trade or business and to the acquisition, holding and disposal of property and the making of contracts for any purpose: Provided that —
(a) the said executive power of the Union shall, in so far as such trade or business or such purpose is not one with respect to which Parliament may make laws, be subject in each State to legislation by the State; and
(b) the said executive power of each State shall, in so far as such trade or business or such purpose is not one with respect to which the State Legislature may make laws, be subject to legislation by Parliament.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'व्यापार आदि जारी रखने की शक्ति' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 298

Power to Carry on Trade, Etc

Input:
Premise: The executive power of the Union and of each State shall extend to the carrying on of any trade or business and to the acquisition, holding and disposal of property and the making of contracts for any purpose: Provided that —
(a) the said executive power of the Union shall, in so far as such trade or business or such purpose is not one with respect to which Parliament may make laws, be subject in each State to legislation by the State; and
(b) the said executive power of each State shall, in so far as such trade or business or such purpose is not one with respect to which the State Legislature may make laws, be subject to legislation by Parliament.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 298

व्यापार आदि जारी रखने की शक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): The executive power of the Union and of each State shall extend to the carrying on of any trade or business and to the acquisition, holding and disposal of property and the making of contracts for any purpose: Provided that —
(a) the said executive power of the Union shall, in so far as such trade or business or such purpose is not one with respect to which Parliament may make laws, be subject in each State to legislation by the State; and
(b) the said executive power of each State shall, in so far as such trade or business or such purpose is not one with respect to which the State Legislature may make laws, be subject to legislation by Parliament.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 299

Contracts

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Contracts'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 299.

Explanation: Article 299 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Contracts' under the Constitution of India.


Article 299

अनुबंध

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'अनुबंध' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 299 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 299 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'अनुबंध' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 299

Contracts

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 299 (Contracts).

Output: Article Article 299 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Contracts' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) All contracts made in the exercise of the executive power of the Union or of a State shall be expressed to be made by the President, or by the Gov.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 299

अनुबंध

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 299 ('अनुबंध') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 299 भारत के संविधान में 'अनुबंध' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) All contracts made in the exercise of the executive power of the Union or of a State shall be expressed to be made by the President, or by the Gov...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 299

Contracts

Input:
Premise: (1) All contracts made in the exercise of the executive power of the Union or of a State shall be expressed to be made by the President, or by the Governor of the State, as the case may be, and all such contracts and all assurances of property made in the exercise of that power shall be executed on behalf of the President or the Governor by such persons and in such manner as he may direct or authorise.
(2) Neither the President nor the Governor shall be personally liable in respect of any contract or assurance made or executed for the purposes of this Constitution, or for the purposes of any enactment relating to the Government of India heretofore in force, nor shall any person making or executing any such contract or assurance on behalf of any of them be personally liable in respect thereof.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Contracts' under Article 299.

Output: Entailment


Article 299

अनुबंध

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) All contracts made in the exercise of the executive power of the Union or of a State shall be expressed to be made by the President, or by the Governor of the State, as the case may be, and all such contracts and all assurances of property made in the exercise of that power shall be executed on behalf of the President or the Governor by such persons and in such manner as he may direct or authorise.
(2) Neither the President nor the Governor shall be personally liable in respect of any contract or assurance made or executed for the purposes of this Constitution, or for the purposes of any enactment relating to the Government of India heretofore in force, nor shall any person making or executing any such contract or assurance on behalf of any of them be personally liable in respect thereof.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 299 के तहत 'अनुबंध' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 299

Contracts

Input:
Premise: (1) All contracts made in the exercise of the executive power of the Union or of a State shall be expressed to be made by the President, or by the Governor of the State, as the case may be, and all such contracts and all assurances of property made in the exercise of that power shall be executed on behalf of the President or the Governor by such persons and in such manner as he may direct or authorise.
(2) Neither the President nor the Governor shall be personally liable in respect of any contract or assurance made or executed for the purposes of this Constitution, or for the purposes of any enactment relating to the Government of India heretofore in force, nor shall any person making or executing any such contract or assurance on behalf of any of them be personally liable in respect thereof.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Contracts'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 299

अनुबंध

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) All contracts made in the exercise of the executive power of the Union or of a State shall be expressed to be made by the President, or by the Governor of the State, as the case may be, and all such contracts and all assurances of property made in the exercise of that power shall be executed on behalf of the President or the Governor by such persons and in such manner as he may direct or authorise.
(2) Neither the President nor the Governor shall be personally liable in respect of any contract or assurance made or executed for the purposes of this Constitution, or for the purposes of any enactment relating to the Government of India heretofore in force, nor shall any person making or executing any such contract or assurance on behalf of any of them be personally liable in respect thereof.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'अनुबंध' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 299

Contracts

Input:
Premise: (1) All contracts made in the exercise of the executive power of the Union or of a State shall be expressed to be made by the President, or by the Governor of the State, as the case may be, and all such contracts and all assurances of property made in the exercise of that power shall be executed on behalf of the President or the Governor by such persons and in such manner as he may direct or authorise.
(2) Neither the President nor the Governor shall be personally liable in respect of any contract or assurance made or executed for the purposes of this Constitution, or for the purposes of any enactment relating to the Government of India heretofore in force, nor shall any person making or executing any such contract or assurance on behalf of any of them be personally liable in respect thereof.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 299

अनुबंध

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) All contracts made in the exercise of the executive power of the Union or of a State shall be expressed to be made by the President, or by the Governor of the State, as the case may be, and all such contracts and all assurances of property made in the exercise of that power shall be executed on behalf of the President or the Governor by such persons and in such manner as he may direct or authorise.
(2) Neither the President nor the Governor shall be personally liable in respect of any contract or assurance made or executed for the purposes of this Constitution, or for the purposes of any enactment relating to the Government of India heretofore in force, nor shall any person making or executing any such contract or assurance on behalf of any of them be personally liable in respect thereof.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 300

Suits and Proceedings

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Suits and Proceedings'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 300.

Explanation: Article 300 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Suits and Proceedings' under the Constitution of India.


Article 300

मुकदमे और कार्यवाही

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'मुकदमे और कार्यवाही' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 300 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 300 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'मुकदमे और कार्यवाही' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 300

Suits and Proceedings

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 300 (Suits and Proceedings).

Output: Article Article 300 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Suits and Proceedings' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) The Government of India may sue or be sued by the name of the Union of India and the Government of a State may sue or be sued by the name of the S.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 300

मुकदमे और कार्यवाही

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 300 ('मुकदमे और कार्यवाही') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 300 भारत के संविधान में 'मुकदमे और कार्यवाही' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) The Government of India may sue or be sued by the name of the Union of India and the Government of a State may sue or be sued by the name of the S...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 300

Suits and Proceedings

Input:
Premise: (1) The Government of India may sue or be sued by the name of the Union of India and the Government of a State may sue or be sued by the name of the State and may, subject to any provisions which may be made by Act of Parliament or of the Legislature of such State enacted by virtue of powers conferred by this Constitution, sue or be sued in relation to their respective affairs in the like cases as the Dominion of India and the corresponding Provinces or the corresponding Indian States might have sued or been sued if this Constitution had not been enacted.
(2) If at the commencement of this Constitution —
(a) any legal proceedings are pending to which the Dominion of India is a party, the Union of India shall be deemed to be substituted for the Dominion in those proceedings; and (
b) any legal proceedings are pending to which a Province or an Indian State is a party, the corresponding State shall be deemed to be substituted for the Province or the Indian State in those proceedings.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Suits and Proceedings' under Article 300.

Output: Entailment


Article 300

मुकदमे और कार्यवाही

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The Government of India may sue or be sued by the name of the Union of India and the Government of a State may sue or be sued by the name of the State and may, subject to any provisions which may be made by Act of Parliament or of the Legislature of such State enacted by virtue of powers conferred by this Constitution, sue or be sued in relation to their respective affairs in the like cases as the Dominion of India and the corresponding Provinces or the corresponding Indian States might have sued or been sued if this Constitution had not been enacted.
(2) If at the commencement of this Constitution —
(a) any legal proceedings are pending to which the Dominion of India is a party, the Union of India shall be deemed to be substituted for the Dominion in those proceedings; and (
b) any legal proceedings are pending to which a Province or an Indian State is a party, the corresponding State shall be deemed to be substituted for the Province or the Indian State in those proceedings.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 300 के तहत 'मुकदमे और कार्यवाही' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 300

Suits and Proceedings

Input:
Premise: (1) The Government of India may sue or be sued by the name of the Union of India and the Government of a State may sue or be sued by the name of the State and may, subject to any provisions which may be made by Act of Parliament or of the Legislature of such State enacted by virtue of powers conferred by this Constitution, sue or be sued in relation to their respective affairs in the like cases as the Dominion of India and the corresponding Provinces or the corresponding Indian States might have sued or been sued if this Constitution had not been enacted.
(2) If at the commencement of this Constitution —
(a) any legal proceedings are pending to which the Dominion of India is a party, the Union of India shall be deemed to be substituted for the Dominion in those proceedings; and (
b) any legal proceedings are pending to which a Province or an Indian State is a party, the corresponding State shall be deemed to be substituted for the Province or the Indian State in those proceedings.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Suits and Proceedings'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 300

मुकदमे और कार्यवाही

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The Government of India may sue or be sued by the name of the Union of India and the Government of a State may sue or be sued by the name of the State and may, subject to any provisions which may be made by Act of Parliament or of the Legislature of such State enacted by virtue of powers conferred by this Constitution, sue or be sued in relation to their respective affairs in the like cases as the Dominion of India and the corresponding Provinces or the corresponding Indian States might have sued or been sued if this Constitution had not been enacted.
(2) If at the commencement of this Constitution —
(a) any legal proceedings are pending to which the Dominion of India is a party, the Union of India shall be deemed to be substituted for the Dominion in those proceedings; and (
b) any legal proceedings are pending to which a Province or an Indian State is a party, the corresponding State shall be deemed to be substituted for the Province or the Indian State in those proceedings.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'मुकदमे और कार्यवाही' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 300

Suits and Proceedings

Input:
Premise: (1) The Government of India may sue or be sued by the name of the Union of India and the Government of a State may sue or be sued by the name of the State and may, subject to any provisions which may be made by Act of Parliament or of the Legislature of such State enacted by virtue of powers conferred by this Constitution, sue or be sued in relation to their respective affairs in the like cases as the Dominion of India and the corresponding Provinces or the corresponding Indian States might have sued or been sued if this Constitution had not been enacted.
(2) If at the commencement of this Constitution —
(a) any legal proceedings are pending to which the Dominion of India is a party, the Union of India shall be deemed to be substituted for the Dominion in those proceedings; and (
b) any legal proceedings are pending to which a Province or an Indian State is a party, the corresponding State shall be deemed to be substituted for the Province or the Indian State in those proceedings.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 300

मुकदमे और कार्यवाही

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The Government of India may sue or be sued by the name of the Union of India and the Government of a State may sue or be sued by the name of the State and may, subject to any provisions which may be made by Act of Parliament or of the Legislature of such State enacted by virtue of powers conferred by this Constitution, sue or be sued in relation to their respective affairs in the like cases as the Dominion of India and the corresponding Provinces or the corresponding Indian States might have sued or been sued if this Constitution had not been enacted.
(2) If at the commencement of this Constitution —
(a) any legal proceedings are pending to which the Dominion of India is a party, the Union of India shall be deemed to be substituted for the Dominion in those proceedings; and (
b) any legal proceedings are pending to which a Province or an Indian State is a party, the corresponding State shall be deemed to be substituted for the Province or the Indian State in those proceedings.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 300A

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Persons Not to Be Deprived of Property Save by Authority of Law'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 300A.

Explanation: Article 300A specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Persons Not to Be Deprived of Property Save by Authority of Law' under the Constitution of India.


Article 300A

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'कानून के अधिकार के अलावा व्यक्तियों को संपत्ति से वंचित नहीं किया जाएगा' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 300A की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 300A विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'कानून के अधिकार के अलावा व्यक्तियों को संपत्ति से वंचित नहीं किया जाएगा' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 300A

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 300A (Persons Not to Be Deprived of Property Save by Authority of Law).

Output: Article Article 300A establishes the fundamental framework for 'Persons Not to Be Deprived of Property Save by Authority of Law' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: No person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law.. This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 300A

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 300A ('कानून के अधिकार के अलावा व्यक्तियों को संपत्ति से वंचित नहीं किया जाएगा') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 300A भारत के संविधान में 'कानून के अधिकार के अलावा व्यक्तियों को संपत्ति से वंचित नहीं किया जाएगा' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: No person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law.। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 300A

Input:
Premise: No person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Persons Not to Be Deprived of Property Save by Authority of Law' under Article 300A.

Output: Entailment


Article 300A

Input:
आधार (Premise): No person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 300A के तहत 'कानून के अधिकार के अलावा व्यक्तियों को संपत्ति से वंचित नहीं किया जाएगा' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 300A

Input:
Premise: No person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Persons Not to Be Deprived of Property Save by Authority of Law'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 300A

Input:
आधार (Premise): No person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'कानून के अधिकार के अलावा व्यक्तियों को संपत्ति से वंचित नहीं किया जाएगा' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 300A

Input:
Premise: No person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 300A

Input:
आधार (Premise): No person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 302

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Power of Parliament to Impose Restrictions on Trade, Commerce and Intercourse'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 302.

Explanation: Article 302 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Power of Parliament to Impose Restrictions on Trade, Commerce and Intercourse' under the Constitution of India.


Article 302

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'व्यापार, वाणिज्य और संभोग पर प्रतिबंध लगाने की संसद की शक्ति' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 302 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 302 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'व्यापार, वाणिज्य और संभोग पर प्रतिबंध लगाने की संसद की शक्ति' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 302

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 302 (Power of Parliament to Impose Restrictions on Trade, Commerce and Intercourse).

Output: Article Article 302 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Power of Parliament to Impose Restrictions on Trade, Commerce and Intercourse' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Parliament may by law impose such restrictions on the freedom of trade, commerce or intercourse between one State and another or within any part of th.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 302

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 302 ('व्यापार, वाणिज्य और संभोग पर प्रतिबंध लगाने की संसद की शक्ति') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 302 भारत के संविधान में 'व्यापार, वाणिज्य और संभोग पर प्रतिबंध लगाने की संसद की शक्ति' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Parliament may by law impose such restrictions on the freedom of trade, commerce or intercourse between one State and another or within any part of th...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 302

Input:
Premise: Parliament may by law impose such restrictions on the freedom of trade, commerce or intercourse between one State and another or within any part of the territory of India as may be required in the public interest.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Power of Parliament to Impose Restrictions on Trade, Commerce and Intercourse' under Article 302.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 302

Input:
आधार (Premise): Parliament may by law impose such restrictions on the freedom of trade, commerce or intercourse between one State and another or within any part of the territory of India as may be required in the public interest.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 302 के तहत 'व्यापार, वाणिज्य और संभोग पर प्रतिबंध लगाने की संसद की शक्ति' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 302

Input:
Premise: Parliament may by law impose such restrictions on the freedom of trade, commerce or intercourse between one State and another or within any part of the territory of India as may be required in the public interest.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Power of Parliament to Impose Restrictions on Trade, Commerce and Intercourse'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 302

Input:
आधार (Premise): Parliament may by law impose such restrictions on the freedom of trade, commerce or intercourse between one State and another or within any part of the territory of India as may be required in the public interest.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'व्यापार, वाणिज्य और संभोग पर प्रतिबंध लगाने की संसद की शक्ति' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 302

Input:
Premise: Parliament may by law impose such restrictions on the freedom of trade, commerce or intercourse between one State and another or within any part of the territory of India as may be required in the public interest.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 302

Input:
आधार (Premise): Parliament may by law impose such restrictions on the freedom of trade, commerce or intercourse between one State and another or within any part of the territory of India as may be required in the public interest.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 303

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Restrictions on the Legislative Powers of the Union and of the States with Regard to Trade and Commerce'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 303.

Explanation: Article 303 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Restrictions on the Legislative Powers of the Union and of the States with Regard to Trade and Commerce' under the Constitution of India.


Article 303

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'व्यापार और वाणिज्य के संबंध में संघ और राज्यों की विधायी शक्तियों पर प्रतिबंध' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 303 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 303 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'व्यापार और वाणिज्य के संबंध में संघ और राज्यों की विधायी शक्तियों पर प्रतिबंध' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 303

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 303 (Restrictions on the Legislative Powers of the Union and of the States with Regard to Trade and Commerce).

Output: Article Article 303 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Restrictions on the Legislative Powers of the Union and of the States with Regard to Trade and Commerce' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) Notwithstanding anything in article 302, neither Parliament nor the Legislature of a State shall have power to make any law giving, or authorising.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.


Article 303

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 303 ('व्यापार और वाणिज्य के संबंध में संघ और राज्यों की विधायी शक्तियों पर प्रतिबंध') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 303 भारत के संविधान में 'व्यापार और वाणिज्य के संबंध में संघ और राज्यों की विधायी शक्तियों पर प्रतिबंध' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) Notwithstanding anything in article 302, neither Parliament nor the Legislature of a State shall have power to make any law giving, or authorising...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।


Article 303

Input:
Premise: (1) Notwithstanding anything in article 302, neither Parliament nor the Legislature of a State shall have power to make any law giving, or authorising the giving of, any preference to one State over another, or making, or authorising the making of, any discrimination between one State and another, by virtue of any entry relating to trade and commerce in any of the Lists in the Seventh Schedule.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall prevent Parliament from making any law giving, or authorising the giving of, any preference or making, or authorising the making of, any discrimination if it is declared by such law that it is necessary to do so for the purpose of dealing with a situation arising from scarcity of goods in any part of the territory of India.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Restrictions on the Legislative Powers of the Union and of the States with Regard to Trade and Commerce' under Article 303.

Output: Entailment


Article 303

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Notwithstanding anything in article 302, neither Parliament nor the Legislature of a State shall have power to make any law giving, or authorising the giving of, any preference to one State over another, or making, or authorising the making of, any discrimination between one State and another, by virtue of any entry relating to trade and commerce in any of the Lists in the Seventh Schedule.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall prevent Parliament from making any law giving, or authorising the giving of, any preference or making, or authorising the making of, any discrimination if it is declared by such law that it is necessary to do so for the purpose of dealing with a situation arising from scarcity of goods in any part of the territory of India.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 303 के तहत 'व्यापार और वाणिज्य के संबंध में संघ और राज्यों की विधायी शक्तियों पर प्रतिबंध' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment


Article 303

Input:
Premise: (1) Notwithstanding anything in article 302, neither Parliament nor the Legislature of a State shall have power to make any law giving, or authorising the giving of, any preference to one State over another, or making, or authorising the making of, any discrimination between one State and another, by virtue of any entry relating to trade and commerce in any of the Lists in the Seventh Schedule.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall prevent Parliament from making any law giving, or authorising the giving of, any preference or making, or authorising the making of, any discrimination if it is declared by such law that it is necessary to do so for the purpose of dealing with a situation arising from scarcity of goods in any part of the territory of India.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Restrictions on the Legislative Powers of the Union and of the States with Regard to Trade and Commerce'.

Output: Contradiction


Article 303

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Notwithstanding anything in article 302, neither Parliament nor the Legislature of a State shall have power to make any law giving, or authorising the giving of, any preference to one State over another, or making, or authorising the making of, any discrimination between one State and another, by virtue of any entry relating to trade and commerce in any of the Lists in the Seventh Schedule.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall prevent Parliament from making any law giving, or authorising the giving of, any preference or making, or authorising the making of, any discrimination if it is declared by such law that it is necessary to do so for the purpose of dealing with a situation arising from scarcity of goods in any part of the territory of India.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'व्यापार और वाणिज्य के संबंध में संघ और राज्यों की विधायी शक्तियों पर प्रतिबंध' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction


Article 303

Input:
Premise: (1) Notwithstanding anything in article 302, neither Parliament nor the Legislature of a State shall have power to make any law giving, or authorising the giving of, any preference to one State over another, or making, or authorising the making of, any discrimination between one State and another, by virtue of any entry relating to trade and commerce in any of the Lists in the Seventh Schedule.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall prevent Parliament from making any law giving, or authorising the giving of, any preference or making, or authorising the making of, any discrimination if it is declared by such law that it is necessary to do so for the purpose of dealing with a situation arising from scarcity of goods in any part of the territory of India.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral


Article 303

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Notwithstanding anything in article 302, neither Parliament nor the Legislature of a State shall have power to make any law giving, or authorising the giving of, any preference to one State over another, or making, or authorising the making of, any discrimination between one State and another, by virtue of any entry relating to trade and commerce in any of the Lists in the Seventh Schedule.
(2) Nothing in clause (1) shall prevent Parliament from making any law giving, or authorising the giving of, any preference or making, or authorising the making of, any discrimination if it is declared by such law that it is necessary to do so for the purpose of dealing with a situation arising from scarcity of goods in any part of the territory of India.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral


Article 304

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Restrictions on Trade, Commerce and Intercourse Among States'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 304.

Explanation: Article 304 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Restrictions on Trade, Commerce and Intercourse Among States' under the Constitution of India.