Article 101

Vacation of Seats

Input: What does Article 101 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 101 governs 'Vacation of Seats'. The constitutional text states: (1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chosen a member of both Houses of his seat in one House or the other.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 101 is titled 'Vacation of Seats' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 101

सीटों की रिक्ति

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 101 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 101 'सीटों की रिक्ति' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: (1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chosen a member of both Houses of his seat in one House or the other.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 101 का शीर्षक 'सीटों की रिक्ति' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 101

Vacation of Seats

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Vacation of Seats'?

Output: Article 101

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Vacation of Seats' under the provisions of Article 101.


Article 101

सीटों की रिक्ति

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'सीटों की रिक्ति' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 101

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 101 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'सीटों की रिक्ति' स्थापित करता है।


Article 101

Vacation of Seats

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Vacation of Seats'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 101.

Explanation: Article 101 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Vacation of Seats' under the Constitution of India.


Article 101

सीटों की रिक्ति

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'सीटों की रिक्ति' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 101 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 101 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'सीटों की रिक्ति' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 101

Vacation of Seats

Input: Summarize Article 101 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 101 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Vacation of Seats'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 101

सीटों की रिक्ति

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 101 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 101 'सीटों की रिक्ति' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 101

Vacation of Seats

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 101 (Vacation of Seats).

Output: Article Article 101 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Vacation of Seats' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chos.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 101

सीटों की रिक्ति

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 101 ('सीटों की रिक्ति') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 101 भारत के संविधान में 'सीटों की रिक्ति' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chos...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 101

Vacation of Seats

Input:
Premise: (1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chosen a member of both Houses of his seat in one House or the other.
(2) No person shall be a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State and if a person is chosen a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State, then, at the expiration of such period as may be specified in rules made by the President, that person's seat in Parliament shall become vacant, unless he has previously resigned his seat in the Legislature of the State.
(3) If a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) becomes subject to any of the disqualifications mentioned in clause (1) or clause (2) of article 102, or 5
(b) resigns his seat by writing under his hand addressed to the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, and his resignation is accepted by the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
Provided that in the case of any resignation referred to in sub-clause (b), if from information received or otherwise and after making such inquiry as he thinks fit, the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, is satisfied that such resignation is not voluntary or genuine, he shall not accept such resignation.
(4) If for a period of sixty days a member of either House of Parliament is without permission of the House absent from all meetings thereof, the House may declare his seat vacant:
Provided that in computing the said period of sixty days no account shall be taken of any period during which the House is prorogued or is adjourned for more than four consecutive days.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Vacation of Seats' under Article 101.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 101

सीटों की रिक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chosen a member of both Houses of his seat in one House or the other.
(2) No person shall be a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State and if a person is chosen a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State, then, at the expiration of such period as may be specified in rules made by the President, that person's seat in Parliament shall become vacant, unless he has previously resigned his seat in the Legislature of the State.
(3) If a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) becomes subject to any of the disqualifications mentioned in clause (1) or clause (2) of article 102, or 5
(b) resigns his seat by writing under his hand addressed to the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, and his resignation is accepted by the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
Provided that in the case of any resignation referred to in sub-clause (b), if from information received or otherwise and after making such inquiry as he thinks fit, the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, is satisfied that such resignation is not voluntary or genuine, he shall not accept such resignation.
(4) If for a period of sixty days a member of either House of Parliament is without permission of the House absent from all meetings thereof, the House may declare his seat vacant:
Provided that in computing the said period of sixty days no account shall be taken of any period during which the House is prorogued or is adjourned for more than four consecutive days.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 101 के तहत 'सीटों की रिक्ति' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 101

Vacation of Seats

Input:
Premise: (1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chosen a member of both Houses of his seat in one House or the other.
(2) No person shall be a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State and if a person is chosen a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State, then, at the expiration of such period as may be specified in rules made by the President, that person's seat in Parliament shall become vacant, unless he has previously resigned his seat in the Legislature of the State.
(3) If a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) becomes subject to any of the disqualifications mentioned in clause (1) or clause (2) of article 102, or 5
(b) resigns his seat by writing under his hand addressed to the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, and his resignation is accepted by the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
Provided that in the case of any resignation referred to in sub-clause (b), if from information received or otherwise and after making such inquiry as he thinks fit, the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, is satisfied that such resignation is not voluntary or genuine, he shall not accept such resignation.
(4) If for a period of sixty days a member of either House of Parliament is without permission of the House absent from all meetings thereof, the House may declare his seat vacant:
Provided that in computing the said period of sixty days no account shall be taken of any period during which the House is prorogued or is adjourned for more than four consecutive days.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Vacation of Seats'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 101

सीटों की रिक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chosen a member of both Houses of his seat in one House or the other.
(2) No person shall be a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State and if a person is chosen a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State, then, at the expiration of such period as may be specified in rules made by the President, that person's seat in Parliament shall become vacant, unless he has previously resigned his seat in the Legislature of the State.
(3) If a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) becomes subject to any of the disqualifications mentioned in clause (1) or clause (2) of article 102, or 5
(b) resigns his seat by writing under his hand addressed to the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, and his resignation is accepted by the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
Provided that in the case of any resignation referred to in sub-clause (b), if from information received or otherwise and after making such inquiry as he thinks fit, the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, is satisfied that such resignation is not voluntary or genuine, he shall not accept such resignation.
(4) If for a period of sixty days a member of either House of Parliament is without permission of the House absent from all meetings thereof, the House may declare his seat vacant:
Provided that in computing the said period of sixty days no account shall be taken of any period during which the House is prorogued or is adjourned for more than four consecutive days.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'सीटों की रिक्ति' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 101

Vacation of Seats

Input:
Premise: (1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chosen a member of both Houses of his seat in one House or the other.
(2) No person shall be a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State and if a person is chosen a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State, then, at the expiration of such period as may be specified in rules made by the President, that person's seat in Parliament shall become vacant, unless he has previously resigned his seat in the Legislature of the State.
(3) If a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) becomes subject to any of the disqualifications mentioned in clause (1) or clause (2) of article 102, or 5
(b) resigns his seat by writing under his hand addressed to the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, and his resignation is accepted by the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
Provided that in the case of any resignation referred to in sub-clause (b), if from information received or otherwise and after making such inquiry as he thinks fit, the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, is satisfied that such resignation is not voluntary or genuine, he shall not accept such resignation.
(4) If for a period of sixty days a member of either House of Parliament is without permission of the House absent from all meetings thereof, the House may declare his seat vacant:
Provided that in computing the said period of sixty days no account shall be taken of any period during which the House is prorogued or is adjourned for more than four consecutive days.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 101

सीटों की रिक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chosen a member of both Houses of his seat in one House or the other.
(2) No person shall be a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State and if a person is chosen a member both of Parliament and of a House of the Legislature of a State, then, at the expiration of such period as may be specified in rules made by the President, that person's seat in Parliament shall become vacant, unless he has previously resigned his seat in the Legislature of the State.
(3) If a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) becomes subject to any of the disqualifications mentioned in clause (1) or clause (2) of article 102, or 5
(b) resigns his seat by writing under his hand addressed to the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, and his resignation is accepted by the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
his seat shall thereupon become vacant:
Provided that in the case of any resignation referred to in sub-clause (b), if from information received or otherwise and after making such inquiry as he thinks fit, the Chairman or the Speaker, as the case may be, is satisfied that such resignation is not voluntary or genuine, he shall not accept such resignation.
(4) If for a period of sixty days a member of either House of Parliament is without permission of the House absent from all meetings thereof, the House may declare his seat vacant:
Provided that in computing the said period of sixty days no account shall be taken of any period during which the House is prorogued or is adjourned for more than four consecutive days.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 101

Vacation of Seats

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 101: Vacation of Seats
Text: (1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chos...

Output: Parliament

Explanation: Article 101 deals with 'Vacation of Seats' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Parliament'.


Article 101

सीटों की रिक्ति

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 101: सीटों की रिक्ति
पाठ: (1) No person shall be a member of both Houses of Parliament and provision shall be made by Parliament by law for the vacation by a person who is chos...

Output: संसद

Explanation: Article 101 'सीटों की रिक्ति' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'संसद' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 102

Disqualifications for Membership

Input: What does Article 102 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output:
Article 102 governs 'Disqualifications for Membership'. The constitutional text states: (1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) if he holds any office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State, other than an office declared by Parliament by law not to disqualify its holder;
(b) if he is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court;
(c) if he is an undischarged insolvent;
(d) if he is not a citizen of India, or has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a foreign State, or is under any acknowledgment of allegiance or adherence to a foreign State;
(e) if he is so disqualified by or under any law made by Parliament.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 102 is titled 'Disqualifications for Membership' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 102

सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 102 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output:
Article 102 'सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: (1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) if he holds any office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State, other than an office declared by Parliament by law not to disqualify its holder;
(b) if he is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court;
(c) if he is an undischarged insolvent;
(d) if he is not a citizen of India, or has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a foreign State, or is under any acknowledgment of allegiance or adherence to a foreign State;
(e) if he is so disqualified by or under any law made by Parliament.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 102 का शीर्षक 'सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 102

Disqualifications for Membership

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Disqualifications for Membership'?

Output: Article 102

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Disqualifications for Membership' under the provisions of Article 102.


Article 102

सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 102

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 102 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं' स्थापित करता है।


Article 102

Disqualifications for Membership

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Disqualifications for Membership'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 102.

Explanation: Article 102 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Disqualifications for Membership' under the Constitution of India.


Article 102

सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 102 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 102 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 102

Disqualifications for Membership

Input: Summarize Article 102 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 102 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Disqualifications for Membership'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 102

सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 102 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 102 'सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 102

Disqualifications for Membership

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 102 (Disqualifications for Membership).

Output:
Article Article 102 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Disqualifications for Membership' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) if he holds any office of profit u.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 102

सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 102 ('सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 102 भारत के संविधान में 'सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) if he holds any office of profit u...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 102

Disqualifications for Membership

Input:
Premise: (1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) if he holds any office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State, other than an office declared by Parliament by law not to disqualify its holder;
(b) if he is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court;
(c) if he is an undischarged insolvent;
(d) if he is not a citizen of India, or has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a foreign State, or is under any acknowledgment of allegiance or adherence to a foreign State;
(e) if he is so disqualified by or under any law made by Parliament.
Explanation.— For the purposes of this clause a person shall not be deemed to hold an office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State by reason only that he is a Minister either for the Union or for such State.
(2) A person shall be disqualified for being a member of either House of Parliament if he is so disqualified under the Tenth Schedule.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Disqualifications for Membership' under Article 102.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 102

सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) if he holds any office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State, other than an office declared by Parliament by law not to disqualify its holder;
(b) if he is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court;
(c) if he is an undischarged insolvent;
(d) if he is not a citizen of India, or has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a foreign State, or is under any acknowledgment of allegiance or adherence to a foreign State;
(e) if he is so disqualified by or under any law made by Parliament.
Explanation.— For the purposes of this clause a person shall not be deemed to hold an office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State by reason only that he is a Minister either for the Union or for such State.
(2) A person shall be disqualified for being a member of either House of Parliament if he is so disqualified under the Tenth Schedule.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 102 के तहत 'सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 102

Disqualifications for Membership

Input:
Premise: (1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) if he holds any office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State, other than an office declared by Parliament by law not to disqualify its holder;
(b) if he is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court;
(c) if he is an undischarged insolvent;
(d) if he is not a citizen of India, or has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a foreign State, or is under any acknowledgment of allegiance or adherence to a foreign State;
(e) if he is so disqualified by or under any law made by Parliament.
Explanation.— For the purposes of this clause a person shall not be deemed to hold an office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State by reason only that he is a Minister either for the Union or for such State.
(2) A person shall be disqualified for being a member of either House of Parliament if he is so disqualified under the Tenth Schedule.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Disqualifications for Membership'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 102

सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) if he holds any office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State, other than an office declared by Parliament by law not to disqualify its holder;
(b) if he is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court;
(c) if he is an undischarged insolvent;
(d) if he is not a citizen of India, or has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a foreign State, or is under any acknowledgment of allegiance or adherence to a foreign State;
(e) if he is so disqualified by or under any law made by Parliament.
Explanation.— For the purposes of this clause a person shall not be deemed to hold an office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State by reason only that he is a Minister either for the Union or for such State.
(2) A person shall be disqualified for being a member of either House of Parliament if he is so disqualified under the Tenth Schedule.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 102

Disqualifications for Membership

Input:
Premise: (1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) if he holds any office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State, other than an office declared by Parliament by law not to disqualify its holder;
(b) if he is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court;
(c) if he is an undischarged insolvent;
(d) if he is not a citizen of India, or has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a foreign State, or is under any acknowledgment of allegiance or adherence to a foreign State;
(e) if he is so disqualified by or under any law made by Parliament.
Explanation.— For the purposes of this clause a person shall not be deemed to hold an office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State by reason only that he is a Minister either for the Union or for such State.
(2) A person shall be disqualified for being a member of either House of Parliament if he is so disqualified under the Tenth Schedule.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 102

सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) if he holds any office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State, other than an office declared by Parliament by law not to disqualify its holder;
(b) if he is of unsound mind and stands so declared by a competent court;
(c) if he is an undischarged insolvent;
(d) if he is not a citizen of India, or has voluntarily acquired the citizenship of a foreign State, or is under any acknowledgment of allegiance or adherence to a foreign State;
(e) if he is so disqualified by or under any law made by Parliament.
Explanation.— For the purposes of this clause a person shall not be deemed to hold an office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State by reason only that he is a Minister either for the Union or for such State.
(2) A person shall be disqualified for being a member of either House of Parliament if he is so disqualified under the Tenth Schedule.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 102

Disqualifications for Membership

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 102: Disqualifications for Membership
Text: (1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) if he holds any office of profit u...

Output: Parliament

Explanation: Article 102 deals with 'Disqualifications for Membership' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Parliament'.


Article 102

सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 102: सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं
पाठ: (1) A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament —
(a) if he holds any office of profit u...

Output: संसद

Explanation: Article 102 'सदस्यता के लिए अयोग्यताएं' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'संसद' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 104

Input: What does Article 104 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 104 governs 'Penalty for Sitting and Voting Before Making Oath or Affirmation Under Article 99 or When Not Qualified or When Disqualified'. The constitutional text states: If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that he is not qualified or that he is disqualified for membership thereof, or that he is prohibited from so doing by the provisions of any law made by Parliament, he shall be liable in respect of each day on which he so sits or votes to a penalty of five hundred rupees to be recovered as a debt due to the Union.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 104 is titled 'Penalty for Sitting and Voting Before Making Oath or Affirmation Under Article 99 or When Not Qualified or When Disqualified' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 104

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 104 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 104 'अनुच्छेद 99 के तहत शपथ लेने या प्रतिज्ञान करने से पहले बैठने और मतदान करने के लिए दंड, या जब योग्य न हो या अयोग्य हो तो जुर्माना' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that he is not qualified or that he is disqualified for membership thereof, or that he is prohibited from so doing by the provisions of any law made by Parliament, he shall be liable in respect of each day on which he so sits or votes to a penalty of five hundred rupees to be recovered as a debt due to the Union.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 104 का शीर्षक 'अनुच्छेद 99 के तहत शपथ लेने या प्रतिज्ञान करने से पहले बैठने और मतदान करने के लिए दंड, या जब योग्य न हो या अयोग्य हो तो जुर्माना' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 104

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Penalty for Sitting and Voting Before Making Oath or Affirmation Under Article 99 or When Not Qualified or When Disqualified'?

Output: Article 104

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Penalty for Sitting and Voting Before Making Oath or Affirmation Under Article 99 or When Not Qualified or When Disqualified' under the provisions of Article 104.


Article 104

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'अनुच्छेद 99 के तहत शपथ लेने या प्रतिज्ञान करने से पहले बैठने और मतदान करने के लिए दंड, या जब योग्य न हो या अयोग्य हो तो जुर्माना' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 104

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 104 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'अनुच्छेद 99 के तहत शपथ लेने या प्रतिज्ञान करने से पहले बैठने और मतदान करने के लिए दंड, या जब योग्य न हो या अयोग्य हो तो जुर्माना' स्थापित करता है।


Article 104

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Penalty for Sitting and Voting Before Making Oath or Affirmation Under Article 99 or When Not Qualified or When Disqualified'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 104.

Explanation: Article 104 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Penalty for Sitting and Voting Before Making Oath or Affirmation Under Article 99 or When Not Qualified or When Disqualified' under the Constitution of India.


Article 104

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'अनुच्छेद 99 के तहत शपथ लेने या प्रतिज्ञान करने से पहले बैठने और मतदान करने के लिए दंड, या जब योग्य न हो या अयोग्य हो तो जुर्माना' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 104 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 104 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'अनुच्छेद 99 के तहत शपथ लेने या प्रतिज्ञान करने से पहले बैठने और मतदान करने के लिए दंड, या जब योग्य न हो या अयोग्य हो तो जुर्माना' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 104

Input: Summarize Article 104 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 104 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Penalty for Sitting and Voting Before Making Oath or Affirmation Under Article 99 or When Not Qualified or When Disqualified'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 104

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 104 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 104 'अनुच्छेद 99 के तहत शपथ लेने या प्रतिज्ञान करने से पहले बैठने और मतदान करने के लिए दंड, या जब योग्य न हो या अयोग्य हो तो जुर्माना' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 104

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 104 (Penalty for Sitting and Voting Before Making Oath or Affirmation Under Article 99 or When Not Qualified or When Disqualified).

Output: Article Article 104 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Penalty for Sitting and Voting Before Making Oath or Affirmation Under Article 99 or When Not Qualified or When Disqualified' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that .... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 104

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 104 ('अनुच्छेद 99 के तहत शपथ लेने या प्रतिज्ञान करने से पहले बैठने और मतदान करने के लिए दंड, या जब योग्य न हो या अयोग्य हो तो जुर्माना') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 104 भारत के संविधान में 'अनुच्छेद 99 के तहत शपथ लेने या प्रतिज्ञान करने से पहले बैठने और मतदान करने के लिए दंड, या जब योग्य न हो या अयोग्य हो तो जुर्माना' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that ...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 104

Input:
Premise: If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that he is not qualified or that he is disqualified for membership thereof, or that he is prohibited from so doing by the provisions of any law made by Parliament, he shall be liable in respect of each day on which he so sits or votes to a penalty of five hundred rupees to be recovered as a debt due to the Union.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Penalty for Sitting and Voting Before Making Oath or Affirmation Under Article 99 or When Not Qualified or When Disqualified' under Article 104.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 104

Input:
आधार (Premise): If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that he is not qualified or that he is disqualified for membership thereof, or that he is prohibited from so doing by the provisions of any law made by Parliament, he shall be liable in respect of each day on which he so sits or votes to a penalty of five hundred rupees to be recovered as a debt due to the Union.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 104 के तहत 'अनुच्छेद 99 के तहत शपथ लेने या प्रतिज्ञान करने से पहले बैठने और मतदान करने के लिए दंड, या जब योग्य न हो या अयोग्य हो तो जुर्माना' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 104

Input:
Premise: If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that he is not qualified or that he is disqualified for membership thereof, or that he is prohibited from so doing by the provisions of any law made by Parliament, he shall be liable in respect of each day on which he so sits or votes to a penalty of five hundred rupees to be recovered as a debt due to the Union.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Penalty for Sitting and Voting Before Making Oath or Affirmation Under Article 99 or When Not Qualified or When Disqualified'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 104

Input:
आधार (Premise): If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that he is not qualified or that he is disqualified for membership thereof, or that he is prohibited from so doing by the provisions of any law made by Parliament, he shall be liable in respect of each day on which he so sits or votes to a penalty of five hundred rupees to be recovered as a debt due to the Union.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'अनुच्छेद 99 के तहत शपथ लेने या प्रतिज्ञान करने से पहले बैठने और मतदान करने के लिए दंड, या जब योग्य न हो या अयोग्य हो तो जुर्माना' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 104

Input:
Premise: If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that he is not qualified or that he is disqualified for membership thereof, or that he is prohibited from so doing by the provisions of any law made by Parliament, he shall be liable in respect of each day on which he so sits or votes to a penalty of five hundred rupees to be recovered as a debt due to the Union.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 104

Input:
आधार (Premise): If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that he is not qualified or that he is disqualified for membership thereof, or that he is prohibited from so doing by the provisions of any law made by Parliament, he shall be liable in respect of each day on which he so sits or votes to a penalty of five hundred rupees to be recovered as a debt due to the Union.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 104

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 104: Penalty for Sitting and Voting Before Making Oath or Affirmation Under Article 99 or When Not Qualified or When Disqualified
Text: If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that ...

Output: Parliament

Explanation: Article 104 deals with 'Penalty for Sitting and Voting Before Making Oath or Affirmation Under Article 99 or When Not Qualified or When Disqualified' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Parliament'.


Article 104

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 104: अनुच्छेद 99 के तहत शपथ लेने या प्रतिज्ञान करने से पहले बैठने और मतदान करने के लिए दंड, या जब योग्य न हो या अयोग्य हो तो जुर्माना
पाठ: If a person sits or votes as a member of either House of Parliament before he has complied with the requirements of article 99, or when he knows that ...

Output: संसद

Explanation: Article 104 'अनुच्छेद 99 के तहत शपथ लेने या प्रतिज्ञान करने से पहले बैठने और मतदान करने के लिए दंड, या जब योग्य न हो या अयोग्य हो तो जुर्माना' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'संसद' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 109

Input: What does Article 109 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 109 governs 'Special Procedure in Respect of Money Bills'. The constitutional text states: (1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 109 is titled 'Special Procedure in Respect of Money Bills' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 109

धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 109 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 109 'धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: (1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 109 का शीर्षक 'धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 109

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Special Procedure in Respect of Money Bills'?

Output: Article 109

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Special Procedure in Respect of Money Bills' under the provisions of Article 109.


Article 109

धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 109

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 109 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया' स्थापित करता है।


Article 109

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Special Procedure in Respect of Money Bills'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 109.

Explanation: Article 109 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Special Procedure in Respect of Money Bills' under the Constitution of India.


Article 109

धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 109 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 109 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 109

Input: Summarize Article 109 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 109 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Special Procedure in Respect of Money Bills'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 109

धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 109 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 109 'धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 109

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 109 (Special Procedure in Respect of Money Bills).

Output:
Article Article 109 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Special Procedure in Respect of Money Bills' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
(2) After a Money Bill has been passed by the House of the People it shall be trans.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 109

धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 109 ('धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 109 भारत के संविधान में 'धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
(2) After a Money Bill has been passed by the House of the People it shall be trans...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 109

Input:
Premise: (1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
(2) After a Money Bill has been passed by the House of the People it shall be transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations and the Council of States shall within a period of fourteen days from the date of its receipt of the Bill return the Bill to the House of the People with its recommendations and the House of the People may thereupon either accept or reject all or any of the recommendations of the Council of States.
(3) If the House of the People accepts any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses with the amendments recommended by the Council of States and accepted by the House of the People.
(4) If the House of the People does not accept any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People without any of the amendments recommended by the Council of States.
(5) If a Money Bill passed by the House of the People and transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations is not returned to the House of the People within the said period of fourteen days, it shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses at the expiration of the said period in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Special Procedure in Respect of Money Bills' under Article 109.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 109

धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
(2) After a Money Bill has been passed by the House of the People it shall be transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations and the Council of States shall within a period of fourteen days from the date of its receipt of the Bill return the Bill to the House of the People with its recommendations and the House of the People may thereupon either accept or reject all or any of the recommendations of the Council of States.
(3) If the House of the People accepts any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses with the amendments recommended by the Council of States and accepted by the House of the People.
(4) If the House of the People does not accept any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People without any of the amendments recommended by the Council of States.
(5) If a Money Bill passed by the House of the People and transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations is not returned to the House of the People within the said period of fourteen days, it shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses at the expiration of the said period in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 109 के तहत 'धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 109

Input:
Premise: (1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
(2) After a Money Bill has been passed by the House of the People it shall be transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations and the Council of States shall within a period of fourteen days from the date of its receipt of the Bill return the Bill to the House of the People with its recommendations and the House of the People may thereupon either accept or reject all or any of the recommendations of the Council of States.
(3) If the House of the People accepts any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses with the amendments recommended by the Council of States and accepted by the House of the People.
(4) If the House of the People does not accept any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People without any of the amendments recommended by the Council of States.
(5) If a Money Bill passed by the House of the People and transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations is not returned to the House of the People within the said period of fourteen days, it shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses at the expiration of the said period in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Special Procedure in Respect of Money Bills'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 109

धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
(2) After a Money Bill has been passed by the House of the People it shall be transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations and the Council of States shall within a period of fourteen days from the date of its receipt of the Bill return the Bill to the House of the People with its recommendations and the House of the People may thereupon either accept or reject all or any of the recommendations of the Council of States.
(3) If the House of the People accepts any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses with the amendments recommended by the Council of States and accepted by the House of the People.
(4) If the House of the People does not accept any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People without any of the amendments recommended by the Council of States.
(5) If a Money Bill passed by the House of the People and transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations is not returned to the House of the People within the said period of fourteen days, it shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses at the expiration of the said period in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 109

Input:
Premise: (1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
(2) After a Money Bill has been passed by the House of the People it shall be transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations and the Council of States shall within a period of fourteen days from the date of its receipt of the Bill return the Bill to the House of the People with its recommendations and the House of the People may thereupon either accept or reject all or any of the recommendations of the Council of States.
(3) If the House of the People accepts any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses with the amendments recommended by the Council of States and accepted by the House of the People.
(4) If the House of the People does not accept any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People without any of the amendments recommended by the Council of States.
(5) If a Money Bill passed by the House of the People and transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations is not returned to the House of the People within the said period of fourteen days, it shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses at the expiration of the said period in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 109

धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
(2) After a Money Bill has been passed by the House of the People it shall be transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations and the Council of States shall within a period of fourteen days from the date of its receipt of the Bill return the Bill to the House of the People with its recommendations and the House of the People may thereupon either accept or reject all or any of the recommendations of the Council of States.
(3) If the House of the People accepts any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses with the amendments recommended by the Council of States and accepted by the House of the People.
(4) If the House of the People does not accept any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People without any of the amendments recommended by the Council of States.
(5) If a Money Bill passed by the House of the People and transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations is not returned to the House of the People within the said period of fourteen days, it shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses at the expiration of the said period in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 109

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 109: Special Procedure in Respect of Money Bills
Text: (1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
(2) After a Money Bill has been passed by the House of the People it shall be trans...

Output: Parliament

Explanation: Article 109 deals with 'Special Procedure in Respect of Money Bills' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Parliament'.


Article 109

धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 109: धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया
पाठ: (1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
(2) After a Money Bill has been passed by the House of the People it shall be trans...

Output: संसद

Explanation: Article 109 'धन विधेयक के संबंध में विशेष प्रक्रिया' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'संसद' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 115

Input: What does Article 115 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output:
Article 115 governs 'Supplementary, Additional or Excess Grants'. The constitutional text states: (1) The President shall —
(a) if the amount authorised by any law made in accordance with the provisions of article 114 to be expended for a particular service for the current financial year is found to be insufficient for the purposes of that year or when a need has arisen during the current financial year for supplementary or additional expenditure upon some new service not contemplated in the annual financial statement for that year, or
(b) if any money has been spent on any service during a financial year in excess of the amount granted for that service and for that year,
cause to be laid before both the Houses of Parliament another statement showing the estimated amount of that expenditure or cause to be presented to the House of the People a demand for such excess, as the case may be.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 115 is titled 'Supplementary, Additional or Excess Grants' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 115

अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 115 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output:
Article 115 'अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: (1) The President shall —
(a) if the amount authorised by any law made in accordance with the provisions of article 114 to be expended for a particular service for the current financial year is found to be insufficient for the purposes of that year or when a need has arisen during the current financial year for supplementary or additional expenditure upon some new service not contemplated in the annual financial statement for that year, or
(b) if any money has been spent on any service during a financial year in excess of the amount granted for that service and for that year,
cause to be laid before both the Houses of Parliament another statement showing the estimated amount of that expenditure or cause to be presented to the House of the People a demand for such excess, as the case may be.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 115 का शीर्षक 'अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 115

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Supplementary, Additional or Excess Grants'?

Output: Article 115

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Supplementary, Additional or Excess Grants' under the provisions of Article 115.


Article 115

अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 115

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 115 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान' स्थापित करता है।


Article 115

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Supplementary, Additional or Excess Grants'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 115.

Explanation: Article 115 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Supplementary, Additional or Excess Grants' under the Constitution of India.


Article 115

अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 115 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 115 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 115

Input: Summarize Article 115 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 115 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Supplementary, Additional or Excess Grants'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 115

अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 115 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 115 'अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 115

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 115 (Supplementary, Additional or Excess Grants).

Output:
Article Article 115 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Supplementary, Additional or Excess Grants' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) The President shall —
(a) if the amount authorised by any law made in accordance with the provisions of article 114 to be expended for a particula.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 115

अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 115 ('अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 115 भारत के संविधान में 'अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) The President shall —
(a) if the amount authorised by any law made in accordance with the provisions of article 114 to be expended for a particula...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 115

Input:
Premise: (1) The President shall —
(a) if the amount authorised by any law made in accordance with the provisions of article 114 to be expended for a particular service for the current financial year is found to be insufficient for the purposes of that year or when a need has arisen during the current financial year for supplementary or additional expenditure upon some new service not contemplated in the annual financial statement for that year, or
(b) if any money has been spent on any service during a financial year in excess of the amount granted for that service and for that year,
cause to be laid before both the Houses of Parliament another statement showing the estimated amount of that expenditure or cause to be presented to the House of the People a demand for such excess, as the case may be.
(2) The provisions of articles 112, 113 and 114 shall have effect in relation to any such statement and expenditure or demand and also to any law to be made authorising the appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of India to meet such expenditure or the grant in respect of such demand as they have effect in relation to the annual financial statement and the expenditure mentioned therein or to a demand for a grant and the law to be made for the authorisation of appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of India to meet such expenditure or grant.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Supplementary, Additional or Excess Grants' under Article 115.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 115

अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The President shall —
(a) if the amount authorised by any law made in accordance with the provisions of article 114 to be expended for a particular service for the current financial year is found to be insufficient for the purposes of that year or when a need has arisen during the current financial year for supplementary or additional expenditure upon some new service not contemplated in the annual financial statement for that year, or
(b) if any money has been spent on any service during a financial year in excess of the amount granted for that service and for that year,
cause to be laid before both the Houses of Parliament another statement showing the estimated amount of that expenditure or cause to be presented to the House of the People a demand for such excess, as the case may be.
(2) The provisions of articles 112, 113 and 114 shall have effect in relation to any such statement and expenditure or demand and also to any law to be made authorising the appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of India to meet such expenditure or the grant in respect of such demand as they have effect in relation to the annual financial statement and the expenditure mentioned therein or to a demand for a grant and the law to be made for the authorisation of appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of India to meet such expenditure or grant.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 115 के तहत 'अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 115

Input:
Premise: (1) The President shall —
(a) if the amount authorised by any law made in accordance with the provisions of article 114 to be expended for a particular service for the current financial year is found to be insufficient for the purposes of that year or when a need has arisen during the current financial year for supplementary or additional expenditure upon some new service not contemplated in the annual financial statement for that year, or
(b) if any money has been spent on any service during a financial year in excess of the amount granted for that service and for that year,
cause to be laid before both the Houses of Parliament another statement showing the estimated amount of that expenditure or cause to be presented to the House of the People a demand for such excess, as the case may be.
(2) The provisions of articles 112, 113 and 114 shall have effect in relation to any such statement and expenditure or demand and also to any law to be made authorising the appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of India to meet such expenditure or the grant in respect of such demand as they have effect in relation to the annual financial statement and the expenditure mentioned therein or to a demand for a grant and the law to be made for the authorisation of appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of India to meet such expenditure or grant.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Supplementary, Additional or Excess Grants'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 115

अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The President shall —
(a) if the amount authorised by any law made in accordance with the provisions of article 114 to be expended for a particular service for the current financial year is found to be insufficient for the purposes of that year or when a need has arisen during the current financial year for supplementary or additional expenditure upon some new service not contemplated in the annual financial statement for that year, or
(b) if any money has been spent on any service during a financial year in excess of the amount granted for that service and for that year,
cause to be laid before both the Houses of Parliament another statement showing the estimated amount of that expenditure or cause to be presented to the House of the People a demand for such excess, as the case may be.
(2) The provisions of articles 112, 113 and 114 shall have effect in relation to any such statement and expenditure or demand and also to any law to be made authorising the appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of India to meet such expenditure or the grant in respect of such demand as they have effect in relation to the annual financial statement and the expenditure mentioned therein or to a demand for a grant and the law to be made for the authorisation of appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of India to meet such expenditure or grant.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 115

Input:
Premise: (1) The President shall —
(a) if the amount authorised by any law made in accordance with the provisions of article 114 to be expended for a particular service for the current financial year is found to be insufficient for the purposes of that year or when a need has arisen during the current financial year for supplementary or additional expenditure upon some new service not contemplated in the annual financial statement for that year, or
(b) if any money has been spent on any service during a financial year in excess of the amount granted for that service and for that year,
cause to be laid before both the Houses of Parliament another statement showing the estimated amount of that expenditure or cause to be presented to the House of the People a demand for such excess, as the case may be.
(2) The provisions of articles 112, 113 and 114 shall have effect in relation to any such statement and expenditure or demand and also to any law to be made authorising the appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of India to meet such expenditure or the grant in respect of such demand as they have effect in relation to the annual financial statement and the expenditure mentioned therein or to a demand for a grant and the law to be made for the authorisation of appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of India to meet such expenditure or grant.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 115

अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The President shall —
(a) if the amount authorised by any law made in accordance with the provisions of article 114 to be expended for a particular service for the current financial year is found to be insufficient for the purposes of that year or when a need has arisen during the current financial year for supplementary or additional expenditure upon some new service not contemplated in the annual financial statement for that year, or
(b) if any money has been spent on any service during a financial year in excess of the amount granted for that service and for that year,
cause to be laid before both the Houses of Parliament another statement showing the estimated amount of that expenditure or cause to be presented to the House of the People a demand for such excess, as the case may be.
(2) The provisions of articles 112, 113 and 114 shall have effect in relation to any such statement and expenditure or demand and also to any law to be made authorising the appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of India to meet such expenditure or the grant in respect of such demand as they have effect in relation to the annual financial statement and the expenditure mentioned therein or to a demand for a grant and the law to be made for the authorisation of appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of India to meet such expenditure or grant.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 115

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 115: Supplementary, Additional or Excess Grants
Text: (1) The President shall —
(a) if the amount authorised by any law made in accordance with the provisions of article 114 to be expended for a particula...

Output: Parliament

Explanation: Article 115 deals with 'Supplementary, Additional or Excess Grants' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Parliament'.


Article 115

अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 115: अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान
पाठ: (1) The President shall —
(a) if the amount authorised by any law made in accordance with the provisions of article 114 to be expended for a particula...

Output: संसद

Explanation: Article 115 'अनुपूरक, अतिरिक्त या अतिरिक्त अनुदान' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'संसद' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 130

Seat of Supreme Court

Input: What does Article 130 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 130 governs 'Seat of Supreme Court'. The constitutional text states: The Supreme Court shall sit in Delhi or in such other place or places, as the Chief Justice of India may, with the approval of the President, from time to time, appoint.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 130 is titled 'Seat of Supreme Court' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 130

सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 130 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 130 'सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: The Supreme Court shall sit in Delhi or in such other place or places, as the Chief Justice of India may, with the approval of the President, from time to time, appoint.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 130 का शीर्षक 'सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 130

Seat of Supreme Court

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Seat of Supreme Court'?

Output: Article 130

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Seat of Supreme Court' under the provisions of Article 130.


Article 130

सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 130

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 130 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट' स्थापित करता है।


Article 130

Seat of Supreme Court

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Seat of Supreme Court'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 130.

Explanation: Article 130 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Seat of Supreme Court' under the Constitution of India.


Article 130

सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 130 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 130 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 130

Seat of Supreme Court

Input: Summarize Article 130 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 130 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Seat of Supreme Court'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 130

सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 130 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 130 'सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 130

Seat of Supreme Court

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 130 (Seat of Supreme Court).

Output: Article Article 130 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Seat of Supreme Court' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: The Supreme Court shall sit in Delhi or in such other place or places, as the Chief Justice of India may, with the approval of the President, from tim.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 130

सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 130 ('सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 130 भारत के संविधान में 'सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: The Supreme Court shall sit in Delhi or in such other place or places, as the Chief Justice of India may, with the approval of the President, from tim...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 130

Seat of Supreme Court

Input:
Premise: The Supreme Court shall sit in Delhi or in such other place or places, as the Chief Justice of India may, with the approval of the President, from time to time, appoint.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Seat of Supreme Court' under Article 130.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 130

सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट

Input:
आधार (Premise): The Supreme Court shall sit in Delhi or in such other place or places, as the Chief Justice of India may, with the approval of the President, from time to time, appoint.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 130 के तहत 'सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 130

Seat of Supreme Court

Input:
Premise: The Supreme Court shall sit in Delhi or in such other place or places, as the Chief Justice of India may, with the approval of the President, from time to time, appoint.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Seat of Supreme Court'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 130

सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट

Input:
आधार (Premise): The Supreme Court shall sit in Delhi or in such other place or places, as the Chief Justice of India may, with the approval of the President, from time to time, appoint.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 130

Seat of Supreme Court

Input:
Premise: The Supreme Court shall sit in Delhi or in such other place or places, as the Chief Justice of India may, with the approval of the President, from time to time, appoint.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 130

सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट

Input:
आधार (Premise): The Supreme Court shall sit in Delhi or in such other place or places, as the Chief Justice of India may, with the approval of the President, from time to time, appoint.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 130

Seat of Supreme Court

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 130: Seat of Supreme Court
Text: The Supreme Court shall sit in Delhi or in such other place or places, as the Chief Justice of India may, with the approval of the President, from tim...

Output: Judiciary

Explanation: Article 130 deals with 'Seat of Supreme Court' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Judiciary'.


Article 130

सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 130: सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट
पाठ: The Supreme Court shall sit in Delhi or in such other place or places, as the Chief Justice of India may, with the approval of the President, from tim...

Output: न्यायपालिका

Explanation: Article 130 'सुप्रीम कोर्ट की सीट' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'न्यायपालिका' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 132

Input: What does Article 132 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 132 governs 'Appellate Jurisdiction of Supreme Court in Appeals from High Courts in Certain Cases'. The constitutional text states: (1) An appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court from any judgment, decree or final order of a High Court in the territory of India, whether in a civil, criminal or other proceeding, if the High Court certifies under article 134A that the case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of this Constitution.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 132 is titled 'Appellate Jurisdiction of Supreme Court in Appeals from High Courts in Certain Cases' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 132

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 132 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 132 'कुछ मामलों में उच्च न्यायालयों से अपील में सर्वोच्च न्यायालय का अपीलीय क्षेत्राधिकार' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: (1) An appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court from any judgment, decree or final order of a High Court in the territory of India, whether in a civil, criminal or other proceeding, if the High Court certifies under article 134A that the case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of this Constitution.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 132 का शीर्षक 'कुछ मामलों में उच्च न्यायालयों से अपील में सर्वोच्च न्यायालय का अपीलीय क्षेत्राधिकार' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 132

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Appellate Jurisdiction of Supreme Court in Appeals from High Courts in Certain Cases'?

Output: Article 132

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Appellate Jurisdiction of Supreme Court in Appeals from High Courts in Certain Cases' under the provisions of Article 132.


Article 132

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'कुछ मामलों में उच्च न्यायालयों से अपील में सर्वोच्च न्यायालय का अपीलीय क्षेत्राधिकार' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 132

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 132 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'कुछ मामलों में उच्च न्यायालयों से अपील में सर्वोच्च न्यायालय का अपीलीय क्षेत्राधिकार' स्थापित करता है।


Article 132

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Appellate Jurisdiction of Supreme Court in Appeals from High Courts in Certain Cases'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 132.

Explanation: Article 132 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Appellate Jurisdiction of Supreme Court in Appeals from High Courts in Certain Cases' under the Constitution of India.


Article 132

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'कुछ मामलों में उच्च न्यायालयों से अपील में सर्वोच्च न्यायालय का अपीलीय क्षेत्राधिकार' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 132 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 132 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'कुछ मामलों में उच्च न्यायालयों से अपील में सर्वोच्च न्यायालय का अपीलीय क्षेत्राधिकार' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 132

Input: Summarize Article 132 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 132 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Appellate Jurisdiction of Supreme Court in Appeals from High Courts in Certain Cases'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 132

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 132 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 132 'कुछ मामलों में उच्च न्यायालयों से अपील में सर्वोच्च न्यायालय का अपीलीय क्षेत्राधिकार' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 132

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 132 (Appellate Jurisdiction of Supreme Court in Appeals from High Courts in Certain Cases).

Output: Article Article 132 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Appellate Jurisdiction of Supreme Court in Appeals from High Courts in Certain Cases' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) An appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court from any judgment, decree or final order of a High Court in the territory of India, whether in a civil, c.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 132

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 132 ('कुछ मामलों में उच्च न्यायालयों से अपील में सर्वोच्च न्यायालय का अपीलीय क्षेत्राधिकार') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 132 भारत के संविधान में 'कुछ मामलों में उच्च न्यायालयों से अपील में सर्वोच्च न्यायालय का अपीलीय क्षेत्राधिकार' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) An appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court from any judgment, decree or final order of a High Court in the territory of India, whether in a civil, c...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 132

Input:
Premise: (1) An appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court from any judgment, decree or final order of a High Court in the territory of India, whether in a civil, criminal or other proceeding, if the High Court certifies under article 134A that the case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of this Constitution.
(3) Where such a certificate is given, any party in the case may appeal to the Supreme Court on the ground that any such question as aforesaid has been wrongly decided.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this article, the expression “final order” includes an order deciding an issue which, if decided in favour of the appellant, would be sufficient for the final disposal of the case.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Appellate Jurisdiction of Supreme Court in Appeals from High Courts in Certain Cases' under Article 132.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 132

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) An appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court from any judgment, decree or final order of a High Court in the territory of India, whether in a civil, criminal or other proceeding, if the High Court certifies under article 134A that the case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of this Constitution.
(3) Where such a certificate is given, any party in the case may appeal to the Supreme Court on the ground that any such question as aforesaid has been wrongly decided.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this article, the expression “final order” includes an order deciding an issue which, if decided in favour of the appellant, would be sufficient for the final disposal of the case.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 132 के तहत 'कुछ मामलों में उच्च न्यायालयों से अपील में सर्वोच्च न्यायालय का अपीलीय क्षेत्राधिकार' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 132

Input:
Premise: (1) An appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court from any judgment, decree or final order of a High Court in the territory of India, whether in a civil, criminal or other proceeding, if the High Court certifies under article 134A that the case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of this Constitution.
(3) Where such a certificate is given, any party in the case may appeal to the Supreme Court on the ground that any such question as aforesaid has been wrongly decided.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this article, the expression “final order” includes an order deciding an issue which, if decided in favour of the appellant, would be sufficient for the final disposal of the case.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Appellate Jurisdiction of Supreme Court in Appeals from High Courts in Certain Cases'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.