Article 31

संपत्ति का अनिवार्य अधिग्रहण

Input:
आधार (Premise): Compulsory acquisition of property. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 6 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 31 के तहत 'संपत्ति का अनिवार्य अधिग्रहण' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 31

Compulsory Acquisition of Property

Input:
Premise: Compulsory acquisition of property. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 6 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Compulsory Acquisition of Property'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 31

संपत्ति का अनिवार्य अधिग्रहण

Input:
आधार (Premise): Compulsory acquisition of property. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 6 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'संपत्ति का अनिवार्य अधिग्रहण' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 31

Compulsory Acquisition of Property

Input:
Premise: Compulsory acquisition of property. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 6 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 31

संपत्ति का अनिवार्य अधिग्रहण

Input:
आधार (Premise): Compulsory acquisition of property. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 6 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 31

Compulsory Acquisition of Property

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 31: Compulsory Acquisition of Property
Text: Compulsory acquisition of property. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 6 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

Output: Fundamental Rights

Explanation: Article 31 deals with 'Compulsory Acquisition of Property' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Fundamental Rights'.


Article 31

संपत्ति का अनिवार्य अधिग्रहण

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 31: संपत्ति का अनिवार्य अधिग्रहण
पाठ: Compulsory acquisition of property. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 6 (w.e.f. 20-6-1979).

Output: मौलिक अधिकार

Explanation: Article 31 'संपत्ति का अनिवार्य अधिग्रहण' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'मौलिक अधिकार' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 31A

Input: What does Article 31A of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output:
Article 31A governs 'Saving of Laws Providing for Acquisition of Estates, Etc'. The constitutional text states: (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or the extinguishment or modification of any such rights, or
(b) the taking over of the management of any property by the State for a limited period either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of the property, or
(c) the amalgamation of two or more corporations either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of any of the corporations, or
(d) the extinguishment or modification of any rights of managing agents, secretaries and treasurers, managing directors, directors or managers of corporations, or of any voting rights of shareholders thereof, or
(e) the extinguishment or modification of any rights accruing by virtue of any agreement, lease or licence for the purpose of searching for, or winning, any mineral or mineral oil, or the premature termination or cancellation of any such agreement, lease or licence,
shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19:
Provided that where such law is a law made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent:
Provided further that where any law makes any provision for the acquisition by the State of any estate and where any land comprised therein is held by a person under his personal cultivation, it shall not be lawful for the State to acquire any portion of such land as is within the ceiling limit applicable to him under any law for the time being in force or any building or structure standing thereon or appurtenant thereto, unless the law relating to the acquisition of such land, building or structure, provides for payment of compensation at a rate which shall not be less than the market value thereof.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 31A is titled 'Saving of Laws Providing for Acquisition of Estates, Etc' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 31A

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 31A क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output:
Article 31A 'सम्पदा आदि के अधिग्रहण हेतु प्रावधान करने वाले कानूनों की बचत' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or the extinguishment or modification of any such rights, or
(b) the taking over of the management of any property by the State for a limited period either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of the property, or
(c) the amalgamation of two or more corporations either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of any of the corporations, or
(d) the extinguishment or modification of any rights of managing agents, secretaries and treasurers, managing directors, directors or managers of corporations, or of any voting rights of shareholders thereof, or
(e) the extinguishment or modification of any rights accruing by virtue of any agreement, lease or licence for the purpose of searching for, or winning, any mineral or mineral oil, or the premature termination or cancellation of any such agreement, lease or licence,
shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19:
Provided that where such law is a law made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent:
Provided further that where any law makes any provision for the acquisition by the State of any estate and where any land comprised therein is held by a person under his personal cultivation, it shall not be lawful for the State to acquire any portion of such land as is within the ceiling limit applicable to him under any law for the time being in force or any building or structure standing thereon or appurtenant thereto, unless the law relating to the acquisition of such land, building or structure, provides for payment of compensation at a rate which shall not be less than the market value thereof.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 31A का शीर्षक 'सम्पदा आदि के अधिग्रहण हेतु प्रावधान करने वाले कानूनों की बचत' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 31A

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Saving of Laws Providing for Acquisition of Estates, Etc'?

Output: Article 31A

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Saving of Laws Providing for Acquisition of Estates, Etc' under the provisions of Article 31A.


Article 31A

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'सम्पदा आदि के अधिग्रहण हेतु प्रावधान करने वाले कानूनों की बचत' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 31A

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 31A के प्रावधानों के तहत 'सम्पदा आदि के अधिग्रहण हेतु प्रावधान करने वाले कानूनों की बचत' स्थापित करता है।


Article 31A

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Saving of Laws Providing for Acquisition of Estates, Etc'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 31A.

Explanation: Article 31A specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Saving of Laws Providing for Acquisition of Estates, Etc' under the Constitution of India.


Article 31A

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'सम्पदा आदि के अधिग्रहण हेतु प्रावधान करने वाले कानूनों की बचत' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 31A की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 31A विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'सम्पदा आदि के अधिग्रहण हेतु प्रावधान करने वाले कानूनों की बचत' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 31A

Input: Summarize Article 31A of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 31A defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Saving of Laws Providing for Acquisition of Estates, Etc'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 31A

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 31A का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 31A 'सम्पदा आदि के अधिग्रहण हेतु प्रावधान करने वाले कानूनों की बचत' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 31A

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 31A (Saving of Laws Providing for Acquisition of Estates, Etc).

Output:
Article Article 31A establishes the fundamental framework for 'Saving of Laws Providing for Acquisition of Estates, Etc' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 31A

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 31A ('सम्पदा आदि के अधिग्रहण हेतु प्रावधान करने वाले कानूनों की बचत') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 31A भारत के संविधान में 'सम्पदा आदि के अधिग्रहण हेतु प्रावधान करने वाले कानूनों की बचत' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 31A

Input:
Premise: (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or the extinguishment or modification of any such rights, or
(b) the taking over of the management of any property by the State for a limited period either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of the property, or
(c) the amalgamation of two or more corporations either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of any of the corporations, or
(d) the extinguishment or modification of any rights of managing agents, secretaries and treasurers, managing directors, directors or managers of corporations, or of any voting rights of shareholders thereof, or
(e) the extinguishment or modification of any rights accruing by virtue of any agreement, lease or licence for the purpose of searching for, or winning, any mineral or mineral oil, or the premature termination or cancellation of any such agreement, lease or licence,
shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19:
Provided that where such law is a law made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent:
Provided further that where any law makes any provision for the acquisition by the State of any estate and where any land comprised therein is held by a person under his personal cultivation, it shall not be lawful for the State to acquire any portion of such land as is within the ceiling limit applicable to him under any law for the time being in force or any building or structure standing thereon or appurtenant thereto, unless the law relating to the acquisition of such land, building or structure, provides for payment of compensation at a rate which shall not be less than the market value thereof.
(2) In this article,—
(a) the expression ''estate'' shall, in relation to any local area, have the same meaning as that expression or its local equivalent has in the existing law relating to land tenures in force in that area and shall also include—
(i) any jagir, inam or muafi or other similar grant and in the States of Tamil Nadu and Kerala, any janmam right;
(ii) any land held under ryotwari settlement;
(iii) any land held or let for purposes of agriculture or for purposes ancillary thereto, including waste land, forest land, land for pasture or sites of buildings and other structures occupied by cultivators of land, agricultural labourers and village artisans;
(b) the expression ''rights'', in relation to an estate, shall include any rights vesting in a proprietor, subproprietor, under-proprietor, tenure-holder, raiyat, under-raiyat or other intermediary and any rights or privileges in respect of land revenue.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Saving of Laws Providing for Acquisition of Estates, Etc' under Article 31A.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 31A

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or the extinguishment or modification of any such rights, or
(b) the taking over of the management of any property by the State for a limited period either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of the property, or
(c) the amalgamation of two or more corporations either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of any of the corporations, or
(d) the extinguishment or modification of any rights of managing agents, secretaries and treasurers, managing directors, directors or managers of corporations, or of any voting rights of shareholders thereof, or
(e) the extinguishment or modification of any rights accruing by virtue of any agreement, lease or licence for the purpose of searching for, or winning, any mineral or mineral oil, or the premature termination or cancellation of any such agreement, lease or licence,
shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19:
Provided that where such law is a law made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent:
Provided further that where any law makes any provision for the acquisition by the State of any estate and where any land comprised therein is held by a person under his personal cultivation, it shall not be lawful for the State to acquire any portion of such land as is within the ceiling limit applicable to him under any law for the time being in force or any building or structure standing thereon or appurtenant thereto, unless the law relating to the acquisition of such land, building or structure, provides for payment of compensation at a rate which shall not be less than the market value thereof.
(2) In this article,—
(a) the expression ''estate'' shall, in relation to any local area, have the same meaning as that expression or its local equivalent has in the existing law relating to land tenures in force in that area and shall also include—
(i) any jagir, inam or muafi or other similar grant and in the States of Tamil Nadu and Kerala, any janmam right;
(ii) any land held under ryotwari settlement;
(iii) any land held or let for purposes of agriculture or for purposes ancillary thereto, including waste land, forest land, land for pasture or sites of buildings and other structures occupied by cultivators of land, agricultural labourers and village artisans;
(b) the expression ''rights'', in relation to an estate, shall include any rights vesting in a proprietor, subproprietor, under-proprietor, tenure-holder, raiyat, under-raiyat or other intermediary and any rights or privileges in respect of land revenue.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 31A के तहत 'सम्पदा आदि के अधिग्रहण हेतु प्रावधान करने वाले कानूनों की बचत' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 31A

Input:
Premise: (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or the extinguishment or modification of any such rights, or
(b) the taking over of the management of any property by the State for a limited period either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of the property, or
(c) the amalgamation of two or more corporations either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of any of the corporations, or
(d) the extinguishment or modification of any rights of managing agents, secretaries and treasurers, managing directors, directors or managers of corporations, or of any voting rights of shareholders thereof, or
(e) the extinguishment or modification of any rights accruing by virtue of any agreement, lease or licence for the purpose of searching for, or winning, any mineral or mineral oil, or the premature termination or cancellation of any such agreement, lease or licence,
shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19:
Provided that where such law is a law made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent:
Provided further that where any law makes any provision for the acquisition by the State of any estate and where any land comprised therein is held by a person under his personal cultivation, it shall not be lawful for the State to acquire any portion of such land as is within the ceiling limit applicable to him under any law for the time being in force or any building or structure standing thereon or appurtenant thereto, unless the law relating to the acquisition of such land, building or structure, provides for payment of compensation at a rate which shall not be less than the market value thereof.
(2) In this article,—
(a) the expression ''estate'' shall, in relation to any local area, have the same meaning as that expression or its local equivalent has in the existing law relating to land tenures in force in that area and shall also include—
(i) any jagir, inam or muafi or other similar grant and in the States of Tamil Nadu and Kerala, any janmam right;
(ii) any land held under ryotwari settlement;
(iii) any land held or let for purposes of agriculture or for purposes ancillary thereto, including waste land, forest land, land for pasture or sites of buildings and other structures occupied by cultivators of land, agricultural labourers and village artisans;
(b) the expression ''rights'', in relation to an estate, shall include any rights vesting in a proprietor, subproprietor, under-proprietor, tenure-holder, raiyat, under-raiyat or other intermediary and any rights or privileges in respect of land revenue.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Saving of Laws Providing for Acquisition of Estates, Etc'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 31A

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or the extinguishment or modification of any such rights, or
(b) the taking over of the management of any property by the State for a limited period either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of the property, or
(c) the amalgamation of two or more corporations either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of any of the corporations, or
(d) the extinguishment or modification of any rights of managing agents, secretaries and treasurers, managing directors, directors or managers of corporations, or of any voting rights of shareholders thereof, or
(e) the extinguishment or modification of any rights accruing by virtue of any agreement, lease or licence for the purpose of searching for, or winning, any mineral or mineral oil, or the premature termination or cancellation of any such agreement, lease or licence,
shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19:
Provided that where such law is a law made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent:
Provided further that where any law makes any provision for the acquisition by the State of any estate and where any land comprised therein is held by a person under his personal cultivation, it shall not be lawful for the State to acquire any portion of such land as is within the ceiling limit applicable to him under any law for the time being in force or any building or structure standing thereon or appurtenant thereto, unless the law relating to the acquisition of such land, building or structure, provides for payment of compensation at a rate which shall not be less than the market value thereof.
(2) In this article,—
(a) the expression ''estate'' shall, in relation to any local area, have the same meaning as that expression or its local equivalent has in the existing law relating to land tenures in force in that area and shall also include—
(i) any jagir, inam or muafi or other similar grant and in the States of Tamil Nadu and Kerala, any janmam right;
(ii) any land held under ryotwari settlement;
(iii) any land held or let for purposes of agriculture or for purposes ancillary thereto, including waste land, forest land, land for pasture or sites of buildings and other structures occupied by cultivators of land, agricultural labourers and village artisans;
(b) the expression ''rights'', in relation to an estate, shall include any rights vesting in a proprietor, subproprietor, under-proprietor, tenure-holder, raiyat, under-raiyat or other intermediary and any rights or privileges in respect of land revenue.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'सम्पदा आदि के अधिग्रहण हेतु प्रावधान करने वाले कानूनों की बचत' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 31A

Input:
Premise: (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or the extinguishment or modification of any such rights, or
(b) the taking over of the management of any property by the State for a limited period either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of the property, or
(c) the amalgamation of two or more corporations either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of any of the corporations, or
(d) the extinguishment or modification of any rights of managing agents, secretaries and treasurers, managing directors, directors or managers of corporations, or of any voting rights of shareholders thereof, or
(e) the extinguishment or modification of any rights accruing by virtue of any agreement, lease or licence for the purpose of searching for, or winning, any mineral or mineral oil, or the premature termination or cancellation of any such agreement, lease or licence,
shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19:
Provided that where such law is a law made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent:
Provided further that where any law makes any provision for the acquisition by the State of any estate and where any land comprised therein is held by a person under his personal cultivation, it shall not be lawful for the State to acquire any portion of such land as is within the ceiling limit applicable to him under any law for the time being in force or any building or structure standing thereon or appurtenant thereto, unless the law relating to the acquisition of such land, building or structure, provides for payment of compensation at a rate which shall not be less than the market value thereof.
(2) In this article,—
(a) the expression ''estate'' shall, in relation to any local area, have the same meaning as that expression or its local equivalent has in the existing law relating to land tenures in force in that area and shall also include—
(i) any jagir, inam or muafi or other similar grant and in the States of Tamil Nadu and Kerala, any janmam right;
(ii) any land held under ryotwari settlement;
(iii) any land held or let for purposes of agriculture or for purposes ancillary thereto, including waste land, forest land, land for pasture or sites of buildings and other structures occupied by cultivators of land, agricultural labourers and village artisans;
(b) the expression ''rights'', in relation to an estate, shall include any rights vesting in a proprietor, subproprietor, under-proprietor, tenure-holder, raiyat, under-raiyat or other intermediary and any rights or privileges in respect of land revenue.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 31A

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or the extinguishment or modification of any such rights, or
(b) the taking over of the management of any property by the State for a limited period either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of the property, or
(c) the amalgamation of two or more corporations either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of any of the corporations, or
(d) the extinguishment or modification of any rights of managing agents, secretaries and treasurers, managing directors, directors or managers of corporations, or of any voting rights of shareholders thereof, or
(e) the extinguishment or modification of any rights accruing by virtue of any agreement, lease or licence for the purpose of searching for, or winning, any mineral or mineral oil, or the premature termination or cancellation of any such agreement, lease or licence,
shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19:
Provided that where such law is a law made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent:
Provided further that where any law makes any provision for the acquisition by the State of any estate and where any land comprised therein is held by a person under his personal cultivation, it shall not be lawful for the State to acquire any portion of such land as is within the ceiling limit applicable to him under any law for the time being in force or any building or structure standing thereon or appurtenant thereto, unless the law relating to the acquisition of such land, building or structure, provides for payment of compensation at a rate which shall not be less than the market value thereof.
(2) In this article,—
(a) the expression ''estate'' shall, in relation to any local area, have the same meaning as that expression or its local equivalent has in the existing law relating to land tenures in force in that area and shall also include—
(i) any jagir, inam or muafi or other similar grant and in the States of Tamil Nadu and Kerala, any janmam right;
(ii) any land held under ryotwari settlement;
(iii) any land held or let for purposes of agriculture or for purposes ancillary thereto, including waste land, forest land, land for pasture or sites of buildings and other structures occupied by cultivators of land, agricultural labourers and village artisans;
(b) the expression ''rights'', in relation to an estate, shall include any rights vesting in a proprietor, subproprietor, under-proprietor, tenure-holder, raiyat, under-raiyat or other intermediary and any rights or privileges in respect of land revenue.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 31A

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 31A: Saving of Laws Providing for Acquisition of Estates, Etc
Text: (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or...

Output: Fundamental Rights

Explanation: Article 31A deals with 'Saving of Laws Providing for Acquisition of Estates, Etc' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Fundamental Rights'.


Article 31A

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 31A: सम्पदा आदि के अधिग्रहण हेतु प्रावधान करने वाले कानूनों की बचत
पाठ: (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for—
(a) the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or...

Output: मौलिक अधिकार

Explanation: Article 31A 'सम्पदा आदि के अधिग्रहण हेतु प्रावधान करने वाले कानूनों की बचत' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'मौलिक अधिकार' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 31B

Input: What does Article 31B of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 31B governs 'Validation of Certain Acts and Regulations'. The constitutional text states: Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in article 31A, none of the Acts and Regulations specified in the Ninth Schedule nor any of the provisions thereof shall be deemed to be void, or ever to have become void, on the ground that such Act, Regulation or provision is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by, any provisions of this Part, and notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of any court or Tribunal to the contrary, each of the said Acts and Regulations shall, subject to the power of any competent Legislature to repeal or amend it, continue in force.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 31B is titled 'Validation of Certain Acts and Regulations' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 31B

कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 31B क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 31B 'कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in article 31A, none of the Acts and Regulations specified in the Ninth Schedule nor any of the provisions thereof shall be deemed to be void, or ever to have become void, on the ground that such Act, Regulation or provision is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by, any provisions of this Part, and notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of any court or Tribunal to the contrary, each of the said Acts and Regulations shall, subject to the power of any competent Legislature to repeal or amend it, continue in force.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 31B का शीर्षक 'कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 31B

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Validation of Certain Acts and Regulations'?

Output: Article 31B

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Validation of Certain Acts and Regulations' under the provisions of Article 31B.


Article 31B

कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 31B

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 31B के प्रावधानों के तहत 'कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता' स्थापित करता है।


Article 31B

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Validation of Certain Acts and Regulations'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 31B.

Explanation: Article 31B specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Validation of Certain Acts and Regulations' under the Constitution of India.


Article 31B

कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 31B की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 31B विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 31B

Input: Summarize Article 31B of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 31B defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Validation of Certain Acts and Regulations'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 31B

कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 31B का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 31B 'कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 31B

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 31B (Validation of Certain Acts and Regulations).

Output: Article Article 31B establishes the fundamental framework for 'Validation of Certain Acts and Regulations' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in article 31A, none of the Acts and Regulations specified in the Ninth Schedule nor a.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 31B

कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 31B ('कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 31B भारत के संविधान में 'कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in article 31A, none of the Acts and Regulations specified in the Ninth Schedule nor a...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 31B

Input:
Premise: Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in article 31A, none of the Acts and Regulations specified in the Ninth Schedule nor any of the provisions thereof shall be deemed to be void, or ever to have become void, on the ground that such Act, Regulation or provision is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by, any provisions of this Part, and notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of any court or Tribunal to the contrary, each of the said Acts and Regulations shall, subject to the power of any competent Legislature to repeal or amend it, continue in force.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Validation of Certain Acts and Regulations' under Article 31B.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 31B

कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता

Input:
आधार (Premise): Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in article 31A, none of the Acts and Regulations specified in the Ninth Schedule nor any of the provisions thereof shall be deemed to be void, or ever to have become void, on the ground that such Act, Regulation or provision is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by, any provisions of this Part, and notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of any court or Tribunal to the contrary, each of the said Acts and Regulations shall, subject to the power of any competent Legislature to repeal or amend it, continue in force.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 31B के तहत 'कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 31B

Input:
Premise: Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in article 31A, none of the Acts and Regulations specified in the Ninth Schedule nor any of the provisions thereof shall be deemed to be void, or ever to have become void, on the ground that such Act, Regulation or provision is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by, any provisions of this Part, and notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of any court or Tribunal to the contrary, each of the said Acts and Regulations shall, subject to the power of any competent Legislature to repeal or amend it, continue in force.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Validation of Certain Acts and Regulations'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 31B

कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता

Input:
आधार (Premise): Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in article 31A, none of the Acts and Regulations specified in the Ninth Schedule nor any of the provisions thereof shall be deemed to be void, or ever to have become void, on the ground that such Act, Regulation or provision is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by, any provisions of this Part, and notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of any court or Tribunal to the contrary, each of the said Acts and Regulations shall, subject to the power of any competent Legislature to repeal or amend it, continue in force.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 31B

Input:
Premise: Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in article 31A, none of the Acts and Regulations specified in the Ninth Schedule nor any of the provisions thereof shall be deemed to be void, or ever to have become void, on the ground that such Act, Regulation or provision is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by, any provisions of this Part, and notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of any court or Tribunal to the contrary, each of the said Acts and Regulations shall, subject to the power of any competent Legislature to repeal or amend it, continue in force.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 31B

कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता

Input:
आधार (Premise): Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in article 31A, none of the Acts and Regulations specified in the Ninth Schedule nor any of the provisions thereof shall be deemed to be void, or ever to have become void, on the ground that such Act, Regulation or provision is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by, any provisions of this Part, and notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of any court or Tribunal to the contrary, each of the said Acts and Regulations shall, subject to the power of any competent Legislature to repeal or amend it, continue in force.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 31B

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 31B: Validation of Certain Acts and Regulations
Text: Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in article 31A, none of the Acts and Regulations specified in the Ninth Schedule nor a...

Output: Fundamental Rights

Explanation: Article 31B deals with 'Validation of Certain Acts and Regulations' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Fundamental Rights'.


Article 31B

कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 31B: कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता
पाठ: Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in article 31A, none of the Acts and Regulations specified in the Ninth Schedule nor a...

Output: मौलिक अधिकार

Explanation: Article 31B 'कुछ अधिनियमों और विनियमों की मान्यता' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'मौलिक अधिकार' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 31D

Input: What does Article 31D of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 31D governs 'Saving of Laws in Respect of Anti-national Activities'. The constitutional text states: Saving of laws in respect of anti-national activities.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 31D is titled 'Saving of Laws in Respect of Anti-national Activities' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 31D

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 31D क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 31D 'राष्ट्र विरोधी गतिविधियों के संबंध में कानूनों की बचत' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: Saving of laws in respect of anti-national activities.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 31D का शीर्षक 'राष्ट्र विरोधी गतिविधियों के संबंध में कानूनों की बचत' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 31D

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Saving of Laws in Respect of Anti-national Activities'?

Output: Article 31D

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Saving of Laws in Respect of Anti-national Activities' under the provisions of Article 31D.


Article 31D

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'राष्ट्र विरोधी गतिविधियों के संबंध में कानूनों की बचत' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 31D

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 31D के प्रावधानों के तहत 'राष्ट्र विरोधी गतिविधियों के संबंध में कानूनों की बचत' स्थापित करता है।


Article 31D

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Saving of Laws in Respect of Anti-national Activities'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 31D.

Explanation: Article 31D specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Saving of Laws in Respect of Anti-national Activities' under the Constitution of India.


Article 31D

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'राष्ट्र विरोधी गतिविधियों के संबंध में कानूनों की बचत' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 31D की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 31D विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'राष्ट्र विरोधी गतिविधियों के संबंध में कानूनों की बचत' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 31D

Input: Summarize Article 31D of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 31D defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Saving of Laws in Respect of Anti-national Activities'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 31D

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 31D का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 31D 'राष्ट्र विरोधी गतिविधियों के संबंध में कानूनों की बचत' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 31D

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 31D (Saving of Laws in Respect of Anti-national Activities).

Output: Article Article 31D establishes the fundamental framework for 'Saving of Laws in Respect of Anti-national Activities' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Saving of laws in respect of anti-national activities. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 2 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).. This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 31D

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 31D ('राष्ट्र विरोधी गतिविधियों के संबंध में कानूनों की बचत') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 31D भारत के संविधान में 'राष्ट्र विरोधी गतिविधियों के संबंध में कानूनों की बचत' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Saving of laws in respect of anti-national activities. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 2 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 31D

Input:
Premise: Saving of laws in respect of anti-national activities. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 2 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Saving of Laws in Respect of Anti-national Activities' under Article 31D.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 31D

Input:
आधार (Premise): Saving of laws in respect of anti-national activities. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 2 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 31D के तहत 'राष्ट्र विरोधी गतिविधियों के संबंध में कानूनों की बचत' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 31D

Input:
Premise: Saving of laws in respect of anti-national activities. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 2 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Saving of Laws in Respect of Anti-national Activities'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 31D

Input:
आधार (Premise): Saving of laws in respect of anti-national activities. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 2 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'राष्ट्र विरोधी गतिविधियों के संबंध में कानूनों की बचत' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 31D

Input:
Premise: Saving of laws in respect of anti-national activities. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 2 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 31D

Input:
आधार (Premise): Saving of laws in respect of anti-national activities. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 2 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 31D

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 31D: Saving of Laws in Respect of Anti-national Activities
Text: Saving of laws in respect of anti-national activities. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 2 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).

Output: Fundamental Rights

Explanation: Article 31D deals with 'Saving of Laws in Respect of Anti-national Activities' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Fundamental Rights'.


Article 31D

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 31D: राष्ट्र विरोधी गतिविधियों के संबंध में कानूनों की बचत
पाठ: Saving of laws in respect of anti-national activities. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 2 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).

Output: मौलिक अधिकार

Explanation: Article 31D 'राष्ट्र विरोधी गतिविधियों के संबंध में कानूनों की बचत' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'मौलिक अधिकार' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 32

Input: What does Article 32 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 32 governs 'Remedies for Enforcement of Rights Conferred by This Part'. The constitutional text states: (1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 32 is titled 'Remedies for Enforcement of Rights Conferred by This Part' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 32

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 32 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 32 'इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को लागू करने के उपाय' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: (1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 32 का शीर्षक 'इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को लागू करने के उपाय' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 32

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Remedies for Enforcement of Rights Conferred by This Part'?

Output: Article 32

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Remedies for Enforcement of Rights Conferred by This Part' under the provisions of Article 32.


Article 32

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को लागू करने के उपाय' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 32

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 32 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को लागू करने के उपाय' स्थापित करता है।


Article 32

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A citizen seeks to file a writ petition directly in the Supreme Court to halt an ongoing violation of their fundamental rights, but the executive issues a decree suspending all citizens' access to judicial remedies.

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential violation of Article 32.

Explanation: Article 32 guarantees the right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the Fundamental Rights. It is itself a fundamental right and cannot be suspended except by constitutional amendment.


Article 32

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक नागरिक अपने मौलिक अधिकारों के निरंतर उल्लंघन को रोकने के लिए सीधे सर्वोच्च न्यायालय में एक रिट याचिका दायर करना चाहता है, लेकिन कार्यपालिका न्यायिक उपचारों तक सभी नागरिकों की पहुंच को निलंबित करने वाला एक डिक्री जारी करती है।

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: अनुच्छेद 32 का संभावित उल्लंघन।

Explanation: अनुच्छेद 32 मौलिक अधिकारों के प्रवर्तन के लिए उपयुक्त कार्यवाही द्वारा सर्वोच्च न्यायालय जाने के अधिकार की गारंटी देता है। यह स्वयं एक मौलिक अधिकार है और संवैधानिक संशोधन के बिना इसे निलंबित नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 32

Input: Summarize Article 32 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 32 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Remedies for Enforcement of Rights Conferred by This Part'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 32

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 32 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 32 'इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को लागू करने के उपाय' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 32

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 32 (Remedies for Enforcement of Rights Conferred by This Part).

Output:
Article Article 32 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Remedies for Enforcement of Rights Conferred by This Part' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed.
(2) The Sup.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 32

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 32 ('इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को लागू करने के उपाय') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 32 भारत के संविधान में 'इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को लागू करने के उपाय' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed.
(2) The Sup...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 32

Input:
Premise: (1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed.
(2) The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part.
(3) Without prejudice to the powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clauses (1) and (2), Parliament may by law empower any other court to exercise within the local limits of its jurisdiction all or any of the powers exercisable by the Supreme Court under clause (2).
(4) The right guaranteed by this article shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by this Constitution.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Remedies for Enforcement of Rights Conferred by This Part' under Article 32.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 32

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed.
(2) The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part.
(3) Without prejudice to the powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clauses (1) and (2), Parliament may by law empower any other court to exercise within the local limits of its jurisdiction all or any of the powers exercisable by the Supreme Court under clause (2).
(4) The right guaranteed by this article shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by this Constitution.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 32 के तहत 'इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को लागू करने के उपाय' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 32

Input:
Premise: (1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed.
(2) The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part.
(3) Without prejudice to the powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clauses (1) and (2), Parliament may by law empower any other court to exercise within the local limits of its jurisdiction all or any of the powers exercisable by the Supreme Court under clause (2).
(4) The right guaranteed by this article shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by this Constitution.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Remedies for Enforcement of Rights Conferred by This Part'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 32

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed.
(2) The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part.
(3) Without prejudice to the powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clauses (1) and (2), Parliament may by law empower any other court to exercise within the local limits of its jurisdiction all or any of the powers exercisable by the Supreme Court under clause (2).
(4) The right guaranteed by this article shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by this Constitution.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को लागू करने के उपाय' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 32

Input:
Premise: (1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed.
(2) The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part.
(3) Without prejudice to the powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clauses (1) and (2), Parliament may by law empower any other court to exercise within the local limits of its jurisdiction all or any of the powers exercisable by the Supreme Court under clause (2).
(4) The right guaranteed by this article shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by this Constitution.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 32

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed.
(2) The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part.
(3) Without prejudice to the powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clauses (1) and (2), Parliament may by law empower any other court to exercise within the local limits of its jurisdiction all or any of the powers exercisable by the Supreme Court under clause (2).
(4) The right guaranteed by this article shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by this Constitution.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 32

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 32: Remedies for Enforcement of Rights Conferred by This Part
Text: (1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed.
(2) The Sup...

Output: Fundamental Rights

Explanation: Article 32 deals with 'Remedies for Enforcement of Rights Conferred by This Part' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Fundamental Rights'.


Article 32

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 32: इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को लागू करने के उपाय
पाठ: (1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed.
(2) The Sup...

Output: मौलिक अधिकार

Explanation: Article 32 'इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को लागू करने के उपाय' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'मौलिक अधिकार' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 32A

Input: What does Article 32A of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 32A governs 'Constitutional Validity of State Laws Not to Be Considered in Proceedings Under Article 32'. The constitutional text states: Constitutional validity of State laws not to be considered in proceedings under article 32.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 32A is titled 'Constitutional Validity of State Laws Not to Be Considered in Proceedings Under Article 32' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 32A

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 32A क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 32A 'अनुच्छेद 32 के तहत कार्यवाही में राज्य कानूनों की संवैधानिक वैधता पर विचार नहीं किया जाएगा' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: Constitutional validity of State laws not to be considered in proceedings under article 32.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 32A का शीर्षक 'अनुच्छेद 32 के तहत कार्यवाही में राज्य कानूनों की संवैधानिक वैधता पर विचार नहीं किया जाएगा' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 32A

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Constitutional Validity of State Laws Not to Be Considered in Proceedings Under Article 32'?

Output: Article 32A

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Constitutional Validity of State Laws Not to Be Considered in Proceedings Under Article 32' under the provisions of Article 32A.


Article 32A

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'अनुच्छेद 32 के तहत कार्यवाही में राज्य कानूनों की संवैधानिक वैधता पर विचार नहीं किया जाएगा' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 32A

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 32A के प्रावधानों के तहत 'अनुच्छेद 32 के तहत कार्यवाही में राज्य कानूनों की संवैधानिक वैधता पर विचार नहीं किया जाएगा' स्थापित करता है।


Article 32A

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Constitutional Validity of State Laws Not to Be Considered in Proceedings Under Article 32'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 32A.

Explanation: Article 32A specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Constitutional Validity of State Laws Not to Be Considered in Proceedings Under Article 32' under the Constitution of India.


Article 32A

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'अनुच्छेद 32 के तहत कार्यवाही में राज्य कानूनों की संवैधानिक वैधता पर विचार नहीं किया जाएगा' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 32A की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 32A विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'अनुच्छेद 32 के तहत कार्यवाही में राज्य कानूनों की संवैधानिक वैधता पर विचार नहीं किया जाएगा' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 32A

Input: Summarize Article 32A of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 32A defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Constitutional Validity of State Laws Not to Be Considered in Proceedings Under Article 32'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 32A

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 32A का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 32A 'अनुच्छेद 32 के तहत कार्यवाही में राज्य कानूनों की संवैधानिक वैधता पर विचार नहीं किया जाएगा' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 32A

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 32A (Constitutional Validity of State Laws Not to Be Considered in Proceedings Under Article 32).

Output: Article Article 32A establishes the fundamental framework for 'Constitutional Validity of State Laws Not to Be Considered in Proceedings Under Article 32' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Constitutional validity of State laws not to be considered in proceedings under article 32. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 32A

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 32A ('अनुच्छेद 32 के तहत कार्यवाही में राज्य कानूनों की संवैधानिक वैधता पर विचार नहीं किया जाएगा') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 32A भारत के संविधान में 'अनुच्छेद 32 के तहत कार्यवाही में राज्य कानूनों की संवैधानिक वैधता पर विचार नहीं किया जाएगा' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Constitutional validity of State laws not to be considered in proceedings under article 32. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 32A

Input:
Premise: Constitutional validity of State laws not to be considered in proceedings under article 32. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 3 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Constitutional Validity of State Laws Not to Be Considered in Proceedings Under Article 32' under Article 32A.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 32A

Input:
आधार (Premise): Constitutional validity of State laws not to be considered in proceedings under article 32. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 3 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 32A के तहत 'अनुच्छेद 32 के तहत कार्यवाही में राज्य कानूनों की संवैधानिक वैधता पर विचार नहीं किया जाएगा' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 32A

Input:
Premise: Constitutional validity of State laws not to be considered in proceedings under article 32. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 3 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Constitutional Validity of State Laws Not to Be Considered in Proceedings Under Article 32'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 32A

Input:
आधार (Premise): Constitutional validity of State laws not to be considered in proceedings under article 32. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 3 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'अनुच्छेद 32 के तहत कार्यवाही में राज्य कानूनों की संवैधानिक वैधता पर विचार नहीं किया जाएगा' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 32A

Input:
Premise: Constitutional validity of State laws not to be considered in proceedings under article 32. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 3 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 32A

Input:
आधार (Premise): Constitutional validity of State laws not to be considered in proceedings under article 32. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 3 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 32A

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 32A: Constitutional Validity of State Laws Not to Be Considered in Proceedings Under Article 32
Text: Constitutional validity of State laws not to be considered in proceedings under article 32. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977...

Output: Fundamental Rights

Explanation: Article 32A deals with 'Constitutional Validity of State Laws Not to Be Considered in Proceedings Under Article 32' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Fundamental Rights'.


Article 32A

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 32A: अनुच्छेद 32 के तहत कार्यवाही में राज्य कानूनों की संवैधानिक वैधता पर विचार नहीं किया जाएगा
पाठ: Constitutional validity of State laws not to be considered in proceedings under article 32. Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977...

Output: मौलिक अधिकार

Explanation: Article 32A 'अनुच्छेद 32 के तहत कार्यवाही में राज्य कानूनों की संवैधानिक वैधता पर विचार नहीं किया जाएगा' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'मौलिक अधिकार' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 33

Input: What does Article 33 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output:
Article 33 governs 'Power of Parliament to Modify the Rights Conferred by This Part in Their Application to Forces, Etc'. The constitutional text states: Parliament may, by law, determine to what extent any of the rights conferred by this Part shall, in their application to,—
(a) the members of the Armed Forces; or
(b) the members of the Forces charged with the maintenance of public order; or
(c) persons employed in any bureau or other organisation established by the State for purposes of intelligence or counter intelligence; or
(d) person employed in, or in connection with, the telecommunication systems set up for the purposes of any Force, bureau or organisation referred to in clauses (a) to (c),
be restricted or abrogated so as to ensure the proper discharge of their duties and the maintenance of discipline among them.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 33 is titled 'Power of Parliament to Modify the Rights Conferred by This Part in Their Application to Forces, Etc' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 33

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 33 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output:
Article 33 'इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को बलों आदि पर लागू करने में संशोधन करने की संसद की शक्ति' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: Parliament may, by law, determine to what extent any of the rights conferred by this Part shall, in their application to,—
(a) the members of the Armed Forces; or
(b) the members of the Forces charged with the maintenance of public order; or
(c) persons employed in any bureau or other organisation established by the State for purposes of intelligence or counter intelligence; or
(d) person employed in, or in connection with, the telecommunication systems set up for the purposes of any Force, bureau or organisation referred to in clauses (a) to (c),
be restricted or abrogated so as to ensure the proper discharge of their duties and the maintenance of discipline among them.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 33 का शीर्षक 'इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को बलों आदि पर लागू करने में संशोधन करने की संसद की शक्ति' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 33

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Power of Parliament to Modify the Rights Conferred by This Part in Their Application to Forces, Etc'?

Output: Article 33

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Power of Parliament to Modify the Rights Conferred by This Part in Their Application to Forces, Etc' under the provisions of Article 33.


Article 33

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को बलों आदि पर लागू करने में संशोधन करने की संसद की शक्ति' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 33

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 33 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को बलों आदि पर लागू करने में संशोधन करने की संसद की शक्ति' स्थापित करता है।


Article 33

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Power of Parliament to Modify the Rights Conferred by This Part in Their Application to Forces, Etc'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 33.

Explanation: Article 33 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Power of Parliament to Modify the Rights Conferred by This Part in Their Application to Forces, Etc' under the Constitution of India.


Article 33

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को बलों आदि पर लागू करने में संशोधन करने की संसद की शक्ति' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 33 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 33 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को बलों आदि पर लागू करने में संशोधन करने की संसद की शक्ति' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 33

Input: Summarize Article 33 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 33 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Power of Parliament to Modify the Rights Conferred by This Part in Their Application to Forces, Etc'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 33

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 33 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 33 'इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को बलों आदि पर लागू करने में संशोधन करने की संसद की शक्ति' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 33

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 33 (Power of Parliament to Modify the Rights Conferred by This Part in Their Application to Forces, Etc).

Output:
Article Article 33 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Power of Parliament to Modify the Rights Conferred by This Part in Their Application to Forces, Etc' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Parliament may, by law, determine to what extent any of the rights conferred by this Part shall, in their application to,—
(a) the members of the Arme.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 33

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 33 ('इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को बलों आदि पर लागू करने में संशोधन करने की संसद की शक्ति') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 33 भारत के संविधान में 'इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को बलों आदि पर लागू करने में संशोधन करने की संसद की शक्ति' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Parliament may, by law, determine to what extent any of the rights conferred by this Part shall, in their application to,—
(a) the members of the Arme...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 33

Input:
Premise: Parliament may, by law, determine to what extent any of the rights conferred by this Part shall, in their application to,—
(a) the members of the Armed Forces; or
(b) the members of the Forces charged with the maintenance of public order; or
(c) persons employed in any bureau or other organisation established by the State for purposes of intelligence or counter intelligence; or
(d) person employed in, or in connection with, the telecommunication systems set up for the purposes of any Force, bureau or organisation referred to in clauses (a) to (c),
be restricted or abrogated so as to ensure the proper discharge of their duties and the maintenance of discipline among them.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Power of Parliament to Modify the Rights Conferred by This Part in Their Application to Forces, Etc' under Article 33.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 33

Input:
आधार (Premise): Parliament may, by law, determine to what extent any of the rights conferred by this Part shall, in their application to,—
(a) the members of the Armed Forces; or
(b) the members of the Forces charged with the maintenance of public order; or
(c) persons employed in any bureau or other organisation established by the State for purposes of intelligence or counter intelligence; or
(d) person employed in, or in connection with, the telecommunication systems set up for the purposes of any Force, bureau or organisation referred to in clauses (a) to (c),
be restricted or abrogated so as to ensure the proper discharge of their duties and the maintenance of discipline among them.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 33 के तहत 'इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को बलों आदि पर लागू करने में संशोधन करने की संसद की शक्ति' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 33

Input:
Premise: Parliament may, by law, determine to what extent any of the rights conferred by this Part shall, in their application to,—
(a) the members of the Armed Forces; or
(b) the members of the Forces charged with the maintenance of public order; or
(c) persons employed in any bureau or other organisation established by the State for purposes of intelligence or counter intelligence; or
(d) person employed in, or in connection with, the telecommunication systems set up for the purposes of any Force, bureau or organisation referred to in clauses (a) to (c),
be restricted or abrogated so as to ensure the proper discharge of their duties and the maintenance of discipline among them.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Power of Parliament to Modify the Rights Conferred by This Part in Their Application to Forces, Etc'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 33

Input:
आधार (Premise): Parliament may, by law, determine to what extent any of the rights conferred by this Part shall, in their application to,—
(a) the members of the Armed Forces; or
(b) the members of the Forces charged with the maintenance of public order; or
(c) persons employed in any bureau or other organisation established by the State for purposes of intelligence or counter intelligence; or
(d) person employed in, or in connection with, the telecommunication systems set up for the purposes of any Force, bureau or organisation referred to in clauses (a) to (c),
be restricted or abrogated so as to ensure the proper discharge of their duties and the maintenance of discipline among them.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को बलों आदि पर लागू करने में संशोधन करने की संसद की शक्ति' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 33

Input:
Premise: Parliament may, by law, determine to what extent any of the rights conferred by this Part shall, in their application to,—
(a) the members of the Armed Forces; or
(b) the members of the Forces charged with the maintenance of public order; or
(c) persons employed in any bureau or other organisation established by the State for purposes of intelligence or counter intelligence; or
(d) person employed in, or in connection with, the telecommunication systems set up for the purposes of any Force, bureau or organisation referred to in clauses (a) to (c),
be restricted or abrogated so as to ensure the proper discharge of their duties and the maintenance of discipline among them.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 33

Input:
आधार (Premise): Parliament may, by law, determine to what extent any of the rights conferred by this Part shall, in their application to,—
(a) the members of the Armed Forces; or
(b) the members of the Forces charged with the maintenance of public order; or
(c) persons employed in any bureau or other organisation established by the State for purposes of intelligence or counter intelligence; or
(d) person employed in, or in connection with, the telecommunication systems set up for the purposes of any Force, bureau or organisation referred to in clauses (a) to (c),
be restricted or abrogated so as to ensure the proper discharge of their duties and the maintenance of discipline among them.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 33

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 33: Power of Parliament to Modify the Rights Conferred by This Part in Their Application to Forces, Etc
Text: Parliament may, by law, determine to what extent any of the rights conferred by this Part shall, in their application to,—
(a) the members of the Arme...

Output: Fundamental Rights

Explanation: Article 33 deals with 'Power of Parliament to Modify the Rights Conferred by This Part in Their Application to Forces, Etc' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Fundamental Rights'.


Article 33

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 33: इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को बलों आदि पर लागू करने में संशोधन करने की संसद की शक्ति
पाठ: Parliament may, by law, determine to what extent any of the rights conferred by this Part shall, in their application to,—
(a) the members of the Arme...

Output: मौलिक अधिकार

Explanation: Article 33 'इस भाग द्वारा प्रदत्त अधिकारों को बलों आदि पर लागू करने में संशोधन करने की संसद की शक्ति' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'मौलिक अधिकार' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 35

Input: What does Article 35 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output:
Article 35 governs 'Legislation to Give Effect to the Provisions of This Part'. The constitutional text states: Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution,—
(a) Parliament shall have, and the Legislature of a State shall not have, power to make laws—
(i) with respect to any of the matters which under clause (3) of article 16, clause (3) of article 32, article 33 and article 34 may be provided for by law made by Parliament; and
(ii) for prescribing punishment for those acts which are declared to be offences under this Part;
(b) any law in force immediately before the commencement of this Constitution in the territory of India with respect to any of the matters referred to in sub-clause (i) of clause (a) or providing for punishment for any act referred to in sub-clause (ii) of that clause shall, subject to the terms thereof and to any adaptations and modifications that may be made therein under article 372, continue in force until altered or repealed or amended by Parliament.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 35 is titled 'Legislation to Give Effect to the Provisions of This Part' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 35

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 35 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output:
Article 35 'इस भाग के प्रावधानों को प्रभावी बनाने के लिए विधान' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: इस संविधान में किसी बात के होते हुए भी,-
(ए) संसद के पास कानून बनाने की शक्ति होगी, और राज्य के विधानमंडल के पास नहीं होगी-
(i) किसी भी मामले के संबंध में, जो अनुच्छेद 16 के खंड (3), अनुच्छेद 32 के खंड (3), अनुच्छेद 33 और अनुच्छेद 34 के तहत संसद द्वारा बनाए गए कानून द्वारा प्रदान किया जा सकता है; और
(ii) उन कृत्यों के लिए दंड निर्धारित करने के लिए जिन्हें इस भाग के तहत अपराध घोषित किया गया है;
(बी) खंड (ए) के उप-खंड (i) में निर्दिष्ट किसी भी मामले के संबंध में भारत के क्षेत्र में इस संविधान के प्रारंभ होने से तुरंत पहले लागू कोई भी कानून, या उस खंड के उप-खंड (ii) में निर्दिष्ट किसी भी कार्य के लिए सजा का प्रावधान, उसकी शर्तों और अनुच्छेद 372 के तहत किए जाने वाले किसी भी अनुकूलन और संशोधन के अधीन, संसद द्वारा परिवर्तित या निरस्त या संशोधित होने तक लागू रहेगा।
स्पष्टीकरण.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 35 का शीर्षक 'इस भाग के प्रावधानों को प्रभावी बनाने के लिए विधान' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 35

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Legislation to Give Effect to the Provisions of This Part'?

Output: Article 35

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Legislation to Give Effect to the Provisions of This Part' under the provisions of Article 35.


Article 35

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'इस भाग के प्रावधानों को प्रभावी बनाने के लिए विधान' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 35

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 35 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'इस भाग के प्रावधानों को प्रभावी बनाने के लिए विधान' स्थापित करता है।


Article 35

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Legislation to Give Effect to the Provisions of This Part'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 35.

Explanation: Article 35 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Legislation to Give Effect to the Provisions of This Part' under the Constitution of India.


Article 35

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'इस भाग के प्रावधानों को प्रभावी बनाने के लिए विधान' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 35 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 35 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'इस भाग के प्रावधानों को प्रभावी बनाने के लिए विधान' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 35

Input: Summarize Article 35 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 35 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Legislation to Give Effect to the Provisions of This Part'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 35

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 35 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 35 'इस भाग के प्रावधानों को प्रभावी बनाने के लिए विधान' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 35

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 35 (Legislation to Give Effect to the Provisions of This Part).

Output:
Article Article 35 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Legislation to Give Effect to the Provisions of This Part' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution,—
(a) Parliament shall have, and the Legislature of a State shall not have, power to make laws—
(i) with.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 35

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 35 ('इस भाग के प्रावधानों को प्रभावी बनाने के लिए विधान') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 35 भारत के संविधान में 'इस भाग के प्रावधानों को प्रभावी बनाने के लिए विधान' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: इस संविधान में किसी बात के होते हुए भी,-
(ए) संसद के पास कानून बनाने की शक्ति होगी, और राज्य के विधानमंडल के पास नहीं होगी-
(i) किसी भी मामले के संबंध...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 35

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution,—
(a) Parliament shall have, and the Legislature of a State shall not have, power to make laws—
(i) with respect to any of the matters which under clause (3) of article 16, clause (3) of article 32, article 33 and article 34 may be provided for by law made by Parliament; and
(ii) for prescribing punishment for those acts which are declared to be offences under this Part;
(b) any law in force immediately before the commencement of this Constitution in the territory of India with respect to any of the matters referred to in sub-clause (i) of clause (a) or providing for punishment for any act referred to in sub-clause (ii) of that clause shall, subject to the terms thereof and to any adaptations and modifications that may be made therein under article 372, continue in force until altered or repealed or amended by Parliament.
Explanation.—In this article, the expression “law in force” has the same meaning as in article 372.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Legislation to Give Effect to the Provisions of This Part' under Article 35.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.