Article 120

संसद में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 120: संसद में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा
पाठ: (1) Notwithstanding anything in Part XVII, but subject to the provisions of article 348, business in Parliament shall be transacted in Hindi or in Eng...

Output: संसद

Explanation: Article 120 'संसद में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'संसद' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 121

Restriction on Discussion in Parliament

Input: What does Article 121 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 121 governs 'Restriction on Discussion in Parliament'. The constitutional text states: No discussion shall take place in Parliament with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties except upon a motion for presenting an address to the President praying for the removal of the Judge as hereinafter provided.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 121 is titled 'Restriction on Discussion in Parliament' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 121

संसद में चर्चा पर रोक

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 121 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 121 'संसद में चर्चा पर रोक' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: No discussion shall take place in Parliament with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties except upon a motion for presenting an address to the President praying for the removal of the Judge as hereinafter provided.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 121 का शीर्षक 'संसद में चर्चा पर रोक' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 121

Restriction on Discussion in Parliament

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Restriction on Discussion in Parliament'?

Output: Article 121

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Restriction on Discussion in Parliament' under the provisions of Article 121.


Article 121

संसद में चर्चा पर रोक

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'संसद में चर्चा पर रोक' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 121

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 121 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'संसद में चर्चा पर रोक' स्थापित करता है।


Article 121

Restriction on Discussion in Parliament

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Restriction on Discussion in Parliament'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 121.

Explanation: Article 121 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Restriction on Discussion in Parliament' under the Constitution of India.


Article 121

संसद में चर्चा पर रोक

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'संसद में चर्चा पर रोक' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 121 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 121 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'संसद में चर्चा पर रोक' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 121

Restriction on Discussion in Parliament

Input: Summarize Article 121 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 121 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Restriction on Discussion in Parliament'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 121

संसद में चर्चा पर रोक

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 121 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 121 'संसद में चर्चा पर रोक' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 121

Restriction on Discussion in Parliament

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 121 (Restriction on Discussion in Parliament).

Output: Article Article 121 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Restriction on Discussion in Parliament' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: No discussion shall take place in Parliament with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his .... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 121

संसद में चर्चा पर रोक

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 121 ('संसद में चर्चा पर रोक') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 121 भारत के संविधान में 'संसद में चर्चा पर रोक' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: No discussion shall take place in Parliament with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his ...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 121

Restriction on Discussion in Parliament

Input:
Premise: No discussion shall take place in Parliament with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties except upon a motion for presenting an address to the President praying for the removal of the Judge as hereinafter provided.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Restriction on Discussion in Parliament' under Article 121.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 121

संसद में चर्चा पर रोक

Input:
आधार (Premise): No discussion shall take place in Parliament with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties except upon a motion for presenting an address to the President praying for the removal of the Judge as hereinafter provided.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 121 के तहत 'संसद में चर्चा पर रोक' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 121

Restriction on Discussion in Parliament

Input:
Premise: No discussion shall take place in Parliament with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties except upon a motion for presenting an address to the President praying for the removal of the Judge as hereinafter provided.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Restriction on Discussion in Parliament'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 121

संसद में चर्चा पर रोक

Input:
आधार (Premise): No discussion shall take place in Parliament with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties except upon a motion for presenting an address to the President praying for the removal of the Judge as hereinafter provided.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'संसद में चर्चा पर रोक' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 121

Restriction on Discussion in Parliament

Input:
Premise: No discussion shall take place in Parliament with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties except upon a motion for presenting an address to the President praying for the removal of the Judge as hereinafter provided.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 121

संसद में चर्चा पर रोक

Input:
आधार (Premise): No discussion shall take place in Parliament with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties except upon a motion for presenting an address to the President praying for the removal of the Judge as hereinafter provided.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 121

Restriction on Discussion in Parliament

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 121: Restriction on Discussion in Parliament
Text: No discussion shall take place in Parliament with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his ...

Output: Parliament

Explanation: Article 121 deals with 'Restriction on Discussion in Parliament' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Parliament'.


Article 121

संसद में चर्चा पर रोक

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 121: संसद में चर्चा पर रोक
पाठ: No discussion shall take place in Parliament with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his ...

Output: संसद

Explanation: Article 121 'संसद में चर्चा पर रोक' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'संसद' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 122

Input: What does Article 122 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 122 governs 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of Parliament'. The constitutional text states: (1) The validity of any proceedings in Parliament shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 122 is titled 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of Parliament' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 122

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 122 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 122 'अदालतें संसद की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगी' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: (1) The validity of any proceedings in Parliament shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 122 का शीर्षक 'अदालतें संसद की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगी' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 122

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of Parliament'?

Output: Article 122

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of Parliament' under the provisions of Article 122.


Article 122

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'अदालतें संसद की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगी' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 122

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 122 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'अदालतें संसद की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगी' स्थापित करता है।


Article 122

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of Parliament'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 122.

Explanation: Article 122 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of Parliament' under the Constitution of India.


Article 122

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'अदालतें संसद की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगी' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 122 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 122 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'अदालतें संसद की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगी' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 122

Input: Summarize Article 122 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 122 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of Parliament'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 122

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 122 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 122 'अदालतें संसद की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगी' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 122

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 122 (Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of Parliament).

Output:
Article Article 122 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of Parliament' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) The validity of any proceedings in Parliament shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.
(2) No offic.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 122

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 122 ('अदालतें संसद की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगी') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 122 भारत के संविधान में 'अदालतें संसद की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगी' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) The validity of any proceedings in Parliament shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.
(2) No offic...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 122

Input:
Premise: (1) The validity of any proceedings in Parliament shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.
(2) No officer or member of Parliament in whom powers are vested by or under this Constitution for regulating procedure or the conduct of business, or for maintaining order, in Parliament shall be subject to the jurisdiction of any court in respect of the exercise by him of those powers.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of Parliament' under Article 122.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 122

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The validity of any proceedings in Parliament shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.
(2) No officer or member of Parliament in whom powers are vested by or under this Constitution for regulating procedure or the conduct of business, or for maintaining order, in Parliament shall be subject to the jurisdiction of any court in respect of the exercise by him of those powers.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 122 के तहत 'अदालतें संसद की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगी' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 122

Input:
Premise: (1) The validity of any proceedings in Parliament shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.
(2) No officer or member of Parliament in whom powers are vested by or under this Constitution for regulating procedure or the conduct of business, or for maintaining order, in Parliament shall be subject to the jurisdiction of any court in respect of the exercise by him of those powers.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of Parliament'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 122

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The validity of any proceedings in Parliament shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.
(2) No officer or member of Parliament in whom powers are vested by or under this Constitution for regulating procedure or the conduct of business, or for maintaining order, in Parliament shall be subject to the jurisdiction of any court in respect of the exercise by him of those powers.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'अदालतें संसद की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगी' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 122

Input:
Premise: (1) The validity of any proceedings in Parliament shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.
(2) No officer or member of Parliament in whom powers are vested by or under this Constitution for regulating procedure or the conduct of business, or for maintaining order, in Parliament shall be subject to the jurisdiction of any court in respect of the exercise by him of those powers.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 122

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The validity of any proceedings in Parliament shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.
(2) No officer or member of Parliament in whom powers are vested by or under this Constitution for regulating procedure or the conduct of business, or for maintaining order, in Parliament shall be subject to the jurisdiction of any court in respect of the exercise by him of those powers.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 122

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 122: Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of Parliament
Text: (1) The validity of any proceedings in Parliament shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.
(2) No offic...

Output: Parliament

Explanation: Article 122 deals with 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of Parliament' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Parliament'.


Article 122

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 122: अदालतें संसद की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगी
पाठ: (1) The validity of any proceedings in Parliament shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.
(2) No offic...

Output: संसद

Explanation: Article 122 'अदालतें संसद की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगी' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'संसद' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 123

Input: What does Article 123 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 123 governs 'Power of President to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Parliament'. The constitutional text states: (1) If at any time, except when both Houses of Parliament are in session, the President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinances as the circumstances appear to him to require.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 123 is titled 'Power of President to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Parliament' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 123

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 123 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 123 'संसद के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राष्ट्रपति की शक्ति' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: (1) If at any time, except when both Houses of Parliament are in session, the President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinances as the circumstances appear to him to require.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 123 का शीर्षक 'संसद के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राष्ट्रपति की शक्ति' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 123

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Power of President to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Parliament'?

Output: Article 123

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Power of President to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Parliament' under the provisions of Article 123.


Article 123

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'संसद के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राष्ट्रपति की शक्ति' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 123

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 123 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'संसद के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राष्ट्रपति की शक्ति' स्थापित करता है।


Article 123

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Power of President to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Parliament'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 123.

Explanation: Article 123 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Power of President to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Parliament' under the Constitution of India.


Article 123

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'संसद के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राष्ट्रपति की शक्ति' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 123 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 123 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'संसद के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राष्ट्रपति की शक्ति' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 123

Input: Summarize Article 123 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 123 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Power of President to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Parliament'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 123

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 123 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 123 'संसद के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राष्ट्रपति की शक्ति' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 123

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 123 (Power of President to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Parliament).

Output: Article Article 123 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Power of President to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Parliament' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) If at any time, except when both Houses of Parliament are in session, the President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessar.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 123

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 123 ('संसद के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राष्ट्रपति की शक्ति') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 123 भारत के संविधान में 'संसद के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राष्ट्रपति की शक्ति' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) If at any time, except when both Houses of Parliament are in session, the President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessar...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 123

Input:
Premise: (1) If at any time, except when both Houses of Parliament are in session, the President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinances as the circumstances appear to him to require.
(2) An Ordinance promulgated under this article shall have the same force and effect as an Act of Parliament, but every such Ordinance —
(a) shall be laid before both Houses of Parliament and shall cease to operate at the expiration of six weeks from the reassembly of Parliament, or, if before the expiration of that period resolutions disapproving it are passed by both Houses, upon the passing of the second of those resolutions; and
(b) may be withdrawn at any time by the President.
Explanation.—Where the Houses of Parliament are summoned to reassemble on different dates, the period of six weeks shall be reckoned from the later of those dates for the purposes of this clause.
(3) If and so far as an Ordinance under this article makes any provision which Parliament would not under this Constitution be competent to enact, it shall be void.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Power of President to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Parliament' under Article 123.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 123

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) If at any time, except when both Houses of Parliament are in session, the President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinances as the circumstances appear to him to require.
(2) An Ordinance promulgated under this article shall have the same force and effect as an Act of Parliament, but every such Ordinance —
(a) shall be laid before both Houses of Parliament and shall cease to operate at the expiration of six weeks from the reassembly of Parliament, or, if before the expiration of that period resolutions disapproving it are passed by both Houses, upon the passing of the second of those resolutions; and
(b) may be withdrawn at any time by the President.
Explanation.—Where the Houses of Parliament are summoned to reassemble on different dates, the period of six weeks shall be reckoned from the later of those dates for the purposes of this clause.
(3) If and so far as an Ordinance under this article makes any provision which Parliament would not under this Constitution be competent to enact, it shall be void.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 123 के तहत 'संसद के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राष्ट्रपति की शक्ति' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 123

Input:
Premise: (1) If at any time, except when both Houses of Parliament are in session, the President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinances as the circumstances appear to him to require.
(2) An Ordinance promulgated under this article shall have the same force and effect as an Act of Parliament, but every such Ordinance —
(a) shall be laid before both Houses of Parliament and shall cease to operate at the expiration of six weeks from the reassembly of Parliament, or, if before the expiration of that period resolutions disapproving it are passed by both Houses, upon the passing of the second of those resolutions; and
(b) may be withdrawn at any time by the President.
Explanation.—Where the Houses of Parliament are summoned to reassemble on different dates, the period of six weeks shall be reckoned from the later of those dates for the purposes of this clause.
(3) If and so far as an Ordinance under this article makes any provision which Parliament would not under this Constitution be competent to enact, it shall be void.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Power of President to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Parliament'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 123

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) If at any time, except when both Houses of Parliament are in session, the President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinances as the circumstances appear to him to require.
(2) An Ordinance promulgated under this article shall have the same force and effect as an Act of Parliament, but every such Ordinance —
(a) shall be laid before both Houses of Parliament and shall cease to operate at the expiration of six weeks from the reassembly of Parliament, or, if before the expiration of that period resolutions disapproving it are passed by both Houses, upon the passing of the second of those resolutions; and
(b) may be withdrawn at any time by the President.
Explanation.—Where the Houses of Parliament are summoned to reassemble on different dates, the period of six weeks shall be reckoned from the later of those dates for the purposes of this clause.
(3) If and so far as an Ordinance under this article makes any provision which Parliament would not under this Constitution be competent to enact, it shall be void.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'संसद के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राष्ट्रपति की शक्ति' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 123

Input:
Premise: (1) If at any time, except when both Houses of Parliament are in session, the President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinances as the circumstances appear to him to require.
(2) An Ordinance promulgated under this article shall have the same force and effect as an Act of Parliament, but every such Ordinance —
(a) shall be laid before both Houses of Parliament and shall cease to operate at the expiration of six weeks from the reassembly of Parliament, or, if before the expiration of that period resolutions disapproving it are passed by both Houses, upon the passing of the second of those resolutions; and
(b) may be withdrawn at any time by the President.
Explanation.—Where the Houses of Parliament are summoned to reassemble on different dates, the period of six weeks shall be reckoned from the later of those dates for the purposes of this clause.
(3) If and so far as an Ordinance under this article makes any provision which Parliament would not under this Constitution be competent to enact, it shall be void.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 123

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) If at any time, except when both Houses of Parliament are in session, the President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinances as the circumstances appear to him to require.
(2) An Ordinance promulgated under this article shall have the same force and effect as an Act of Parliament, but every such Ordinance —
(a) shall be laid before both Houses of Parliament and shall cease to operate at the expiration of six weeks from the reassembly of Parliament, or, if before the expiration of that period resolutions disapproving it are passed by both Houses, upon the passing of the second of those resolutions; and
(b) may be withdrawn at any time by the President.
Explanation.—Where the Houses of Parliament are summoned to reassemble on different dates, the period of six weeks shall be reckoned from the later of those dates for the purposes of this clause.
(3) If and so far as an Ordinance under this article makes any provision which Parliament would not under this Constitution be competent to enact, it shall be void.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 123

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 123: Power of President to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Parliament
Text: (1) If at any time, except when both Houses of Parliament are in session, the President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessar...

Output: Union Government

Explanation: Article 123 deals with 'Power of President to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Parliament' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Union Government'.


Article 123

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 123: संसद के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राष्ट्रपति की शक्ति
पाठ: (1) If at any time, except when both Houses of Parliament are in session, the President is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessar...

Output: संघ सरकार

Explanation: Article 123 'संसद के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राष्ट्रपति की शक्ति' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'संघ सरकार' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 124

Input: What does Article 124 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 124 governs 'Establishment and Constitution of Supreme Court'. The constitutional text states: (1) There shall be a Supreme Court of India consisting of a Chief Justice of India and, until Parliament by law prescribes a larger number, of not more than seven other Judges.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 124 is titled 'Establishment and Constitution of Supreme Court' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 124

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 124 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 124 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की स्थापना एवं संविधान' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: (1) There shall be a Supreme Court of India consisting of a Chief Justice of India and, until Parliament by law prescribes a larger number, of not more than seven other Judges.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 124 का शीर्षक 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की स्थापना एवं संविधान' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 124

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Establishment and Constitution of Supreme Court'?

Output: Article 124

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Establishment and Constitution of Supreme Court' under the provisions of Article 124.


Article 124

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की स्थापना एवं संविधान' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 124

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 124 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की स्थापना एवं संविधान' स्थापित करता है।


Article 124

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Establishment and Constitution of Supreme Court'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 124.

Explanation: Article 124 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Establishment and Constitution of Supreme Court' under the Constitution of India.


Article 124

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की स्थापना एवं संविधान' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 124 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 124 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की स्थापना एवं संविधान' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 124

Input: Summarize Article 124 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 124 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Establishment and Constitution of Supreme Court'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 124

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 124 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 124 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की स्थापना एवं संविधान' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 124

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 124 (Establishment and Constitution of Supreme Court).

Output: Article Article 124 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Establishment and Constitution of Supreme Court' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) There shall be a Supreme Court of India consisting of a Chief Justice of India and, until Parliament by law prescribes a larger number, of not mor.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 124

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 124 ('सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की स्थापना एवं संविधान') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 124 भारत के संविधान में 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की स्थापना एवं संविधान' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) There shall be a Supreme Court of India consisting of a Chief Justice of India and, until Parliament by law prescribes a larger number, of not mor...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 124

Input:
Premise: (1) There shall be a Supreme Court of India consisting of a Chief Justice of India and, until Parliament by law prescribes a larger number, of not more than seven other Judges.
(2) Every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal after consultation with such of the Judges of the Supreme Court and of the High Courts in the States as the President may deem necessary for the purpose and shall hold office until he attains the age of sixty-five years:
Provided that in the case of appointment of a Judge other than the Chief Justice, the Chief Justice of India shall always be consulted:
Provided further that —
(a) a Judge may, by writing under his hand addressed to the President, resign his office;
(b) a Judge may be removed from his office in the manner provided in clause (4).
(2A) The age of a Judge of the Supreme Court shall be determined by such authority and in such manner as Parliament may by law provide.
(3) A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court unless he is a citizen of India and —
(a) has been for at least five years a Judge of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession; or
(b) has been for at least ten years an advocate of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession; or
(c) is, in the opinion of the President, a distinguished jurist.
Explanation I.—In this clause "High Court'' means a High Court which exercises, or which at any time before the commencement of this Constitution exercised, jurisdiction in any part of the territory of India.
Explanation II.—In computing for the purpose of this clause the period during which a person has been an advocate, any period during which a person has held judicial office not inferior to that of a district judge after he became an advocate shall be included.
(4) A Judge of the Supreme Court shall not be removed from his office except by an order of the President passed after an address by each House of Parliament supported by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two - thirds of the members of that House present and voting has been presented to the President in the same session for such removal on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity.
(5) Parliament may by law regulate the procedure for the presentation of an address and for the investigation and proof of the misbehaviour or incapacity of a Judge under clause (4).
(6) Every person appointed to be a Judge of the Supreme Court shall, before he enters upon his office, make and subscribe before the President, or some person appointed in that behalf by him, an oath or affirmation according to the form set out for the purpose in the Third Schedule.
(7) No person who has held office as a Judge of the Supreme Court shall plead or act in any court or before any authority within the territory of India.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Establishment and Constitution of Supreme Court' under Article 124.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 124

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) There shall be a Supreme Court of India consisting of a Chief Justice of India and, until Parliament by law prescribes a larger number, of not more than seven other Judges.
(2) Every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal after consultation with such of the Judges of the Supreme Court and of the High Courts in the States as the President may deem necessary for the purpose and shall hold office until he attains the age of sixty-five years:
Provided that in the case of appointment of a Judge other than the Chief Justice, the Chief Justice of India shall always be consulted:
Provided further that —
(a) a Judge may, by writing under his hand addressed to the President, resign his office;
(b) a Judge may be removed from his office in the manner provided in clause (4).
(2A) The age of a Judge of the Supreme Court shall be determined by such authority and in such manner as Parliament may by law provide.
(3) A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court unless he is a citizen of India and —
(a) has been for at least five years a Judge of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession; or
(b) has been for at least ten years an advocate of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession; or
(c) is, in the opinion of the President, a distinguished jurist.
Explanation I.—In this clause "High Court'' means a High Court which exercises, or which at any time before the commencement of this Constitution exercised, jurisdiction in any part of the territory of India.
Explanation II.—In computing for the purpose of this clause the period during which a person has been an advocate, any period during which a person has held judicial office not inferior to that of a district judge after he became an advocate shall be included.
(4) A Judge of the Supreme Court shall not be removed from his office except by an order of the President passed after an address by each House of Parliament supported by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two - thirds of the members of that House present and voting has been presented to the President in the same session for such removal on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity.
(5) Parliament may by law regulate the procedure for the presentation of an address and for the investigation and proof of the misbehaviour or incapacity of a Judge under clause (4).
(6) Every person appointed to be a Judge of the Supreme Court shall, before he enters upon his office, make and subscribe before the President, or some person appointed in that behalf by him, an oath or affirmation according to the form set out for the purpose in the Third Schedule.
(7) No person who has held office as a Judge of the Supreme Court shall plead or act in any court or before any authority within the territory of India.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 124 के तहत 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की स्थापना एवं संविधान' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 124

Input:
Premise: (1) There shall be a Supreme Court of India consisting of a Chief Justice of India and, until Parliament by law prescribes a larger number, of not more than seven other Judges.
(2) Every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal after consultation with such of the Judges of the Supreme Court and of the High Courts in the States as the President may deem necessary for the purpose and shall hold office until he attains the age of sixty-five years:
Provided that in the case of appointment of a Judge other than the Chief Justice, the Chief Justice of India shall always be consulted:
Provided further that —
(a) a Judge may, by writing under his hand addressed to the President, resign his office;
(b) a Judge may be removed from his office in the manner provided in clause (4).
(2A) The age of a Judge of the Supreme Court shall be determined by such authority and in such manner as Parliament may by law provide.
(3) A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court unless he is a citizen of India and —
(a) has been for at least five years a Judge of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession; or
(b) has been for at least ten years an advocate of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession; or
(c) is, in the opinion of the President, a distinguished jurist.
Explanation I.—In this clause "High Court'' means a High Court which exercises, or which at any time before the commencement of this Constitution exercised, jurisdiction in any part of the territory of India.
Explanation II.—In computing for the purpose of this clause the period during which a person has been an advocate, any period during which a person has held judicial office not inferior to that of a district judge after he became an advocate shall be included.
(4) A Judge of the Supreme Court shall not be removed from his office except by an order of the President passed after an address by each House of Parliament supported by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two - thirds of the members of that House present and voting has been presented to the President in the same session for such removal on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity.
(5) Parliament may by law regulate the procedure for the presentation of an address and for the investigation and proof of the misbehaviour or incapacity of a Judge under clause (4).
(6) Every person appointed to be a Judge of the Supreme Court shall, before he enters upon his office, make and subscribe before the President, or some person appointed in that behalf by him, an oath or affirmation according to the form set out for the purpose in the Third Schedule.
(7) No person who has held office as a Judge of the Supreme Court shall plead or act in any court or before any authority within the territory of India.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Establishment and Constitution of Supreme Court'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 124

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) There shall be a Supreme Court of India consisting of a Chief Justice of India and, until Parliament by law prescribes a larger number, of not more than seven other Judges.
(2) Every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal after consultation with such of the Judges of the Supreme Court and of the High Courts in the States as the President may deem necessary for the purpose and shall hold office until he attains the age of sixty-five years:
Provided that in the case of appointment of a Judge other than the Chief Justice, the Chief Justice of India shall always be consulted:
Provided further that —
(a) a Judge may, by writing under his hand addressed to the President, resign his office;
(b) a Judge may be removed from his office in the manner provided in clause (4).
(2A) The age of a Judge of the Supreme Court shall be determined by such authority and in such manner as Parliament may by law provide.
(3) A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court unless he is a citizen of India and —
(a) has been for at least five years a Judge of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession; or
(b) has been for at least ten years an advocate of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession; or
(c) is, in the opinion of the President, a distinguished jurist.
Explanation I.—In this clause "High Court'' means a High Court which exercises, or which at any time before the commencement of this Constitution exercised, jurisdiction in any part of the territory of India.
Explanation II.—In computing for the purpose of this clause the period during which a person has been an advocate, any period during which a person has held judicial office not inferior to that of a district judge after he became an advocate shall be included.
(4) A Judge of the Supreme Court shall not be removed from his office except by an order of the President passed after an address by each House of Parliament supported by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two - thirds of the members of that House present and voting has been presented to the President in the same session for such removal on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity.
(5) Parliament may by law regulate the procedure for the presentation of an address and for the investigation and proof of the misbehaviour or incapacity of a Judge under clause (4).
(6) Every person appointed to be a Judge of the Supreme Court shall, before he enters upon his office, make and subscribe before the President, or some person appointed in that behalf by him, an oath or affirmation according to the form set out for the purpose in the Third Schedule.
(7) No person who has held office as a Judge of the Supreme Court shall plead or act in any court or before any authority within the territory of India.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की स्थापना एवं संविधान' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 124

Input:
Premise: (1) There shall be a Supreme Court of India consisting of a Chief Justice of India and, until Parliament by law prescribes a larger number, of not more than seven other Judges.
(2) Every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal after consultation with such of the Judges of the Supreme Court and of the High Courts in the States as the President may deem necessary for the purpose and shall hold office until he attains the age of sixty-five years:
Provided that in the case of appointment of a Judge other than the Chief Justice, the Chief Justice of India shall always be consulted:
Provided further that —
(a) a Judge may, by writing under his hand addressed to the President, resign his office;
(b) a Judge may be removed from his office in the manner provided in clause (4).
(2A) The age of a Judge of the Supreme Court shall be determined by such authority and in such manner as Parliament may by law provide.
(3) A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court unless he is a citizen of India and —
(a) has been for at least five years a Judge of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession; or
(b) has been for at least ten years an advocate of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession; or
(c) is, in the opinion of the President, a distinguished jurist.
Explanation I.—In this clause "High Court'' means a High Court which exercises, or which at any time before the commencement of this Constitution exercised, jurisdiction in any part of the territory of India.
Explanation II.—In computing for the purpose of this clause the period during which a person has been an advocate, any period during which a person has held judicial office not inferior to that of a district judge after he became an advocate shall be included.
(4) A Judge of the Supreme Court shall not be removed from his office except by an order of the President passed after an address by each House of Parliament supported by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two - thirds of the members of that House present and voting has been presented to the President in the same session for such removal on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity.
(5) Parliament may by law regulate the procedure for the presentation of an address and for the investigation and proof of the misbehaviour or incapacity of a Judge under clause (4).
(6) Every person appointed to be a Judge of the Supreme Court shall, before he enters upon his office, make and subscribe before the President, or some person appointed in that behalf by him, an oath or affirmation according to the form set out for the purpose in the Third Schedule.
(7) No person who has held office as a Judge of the Supreme Court shall plead or act in any court or before any authority within the territory of India.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 124

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) There shall be a Supreme Court of India consisting of a Chief Justice of India and, until Parliament by law prescribes a larger number, of not more than seven other Judges.
(2) Every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal after consultation with such of the Judges of the Supreme Court and of the High Courts in the States as the President may deem necessary for the purpose and shall hold office until he attains the age of sixty-five years:
Provided that in the case of appointment of a Judge other than the Chief Justice, the Chief Justice of India shall always be consulted:
Provided further that —
(a) a Judge may, by writing under his hand addressed to the President, resign his office;
(b) a Judge may be removed from his office in the manner provided in clause (4).
(2A) The age of a Judge of the Supreme Court shall be determined by such authority and in such manner as Parliament may by law provide.
(3) A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court unless he is a citizen of India and —
(a) has been for at least five years a Judge of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession; or
(b) has been for at least ten years an advocate of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession; or
(c) is, in the opinion of the President, a distinguished jurist.
Explanation I.—In this clause "High Court'' means a High Court which exercises, or which at any time before the commencement of this Constitution exercised, jurisdiction in any part of the territory of India.
Explanation II.—In computing for the purpose of this clause the period during which a person has been an advocate, any period during which a person has held judicial office not inferior to that of a district judge after he became an advocate shall be included.
(4) A Judge of the Supreme Court shall not be removed from his office except by an order of the President passed after an address by each House of Parliament supported by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two - thirds of the members of that House present and voting has been presented to the President in the same session for such removal on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity.
(5) Parliament may by law regulate the procedure for the presentation of an address and for the investigation and proof of the misbehaviour or incapacity of a Judge under clause (4).
(6) Every person appointed to be a Judge of the Supreme Court shall, before he enters upon his office, make and subscribe before the President, or some person appointed in that behalf by him, an oath or affirmation according to the form set out for the purpose in the Third Schedule.
(7) No person who has held office as a Judge of the Supreme Court shall plead or act in any court or before any authority within the territory of India.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 124

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 124: Establishment and Constitution of Supreme Court
Text: (1) There shall be a Supreme Court of India consisting of a Chief Justice of India and, until Parliament by law prescribes a larger number, of not mor...

Output: Judiciary

Explanation: Article 124 deals with 'Establishment and Constitution of Supreme Court' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Judiciary'.


Article 124

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 124: सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की स्थापना एवं संविधान
पाठ: (1) There shall be a Supreme Court of India consisting of a Chief Justice of India and, until Parliament by law prescribes a larger number, of not mor...

Output: न्यायपालिका

Explanation: Article 124 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की स्थापना एवं संविधान' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'न्यायपालिका' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 127

Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges

Input: What does Article 127 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 127 governs 'Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges'. The constitutional text states: (1) If at any time there should not be a quorum of the Judges of the Supreme Court available to hold or continue any session of the Court, the Chief Justice of India may, with the previous consent of the President and after consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned, request in writing the attendance at the sittings of the Court, as an ad hoc Judge, for such period as may be necessary, of a Judge of a High Court duly qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court to be designated by the Chief Justice of India.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 127 is titled 'Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 127

तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 127 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 127 'तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: (1) If at any time there should not be a quorum of the Judges of the Supreme Court available to hold or continue any session of the Court, the Chief Justice of India may, with the previous consent of the President and after consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned, request in writing the attendance at the sittings of the Court, as an ad hoc Judge, for such period as may be necessary, of a Judge of a High Court duly qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court to be designated by the Chief Justice of India.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 127 का शीर्षक 'तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 127

Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges'?

Output: Article 127

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges' under the provisions of Article 127.


Article 127

तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 127

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 127 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति' स्थापित करता है।


Article 127

Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 127.

Explanation: Article 127 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges' under the Constitution of India.


Article 127

तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 127 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 127 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 127

Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges

Input: Summarize Article 127 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 127 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 127

तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 127 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 127 'तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 127

Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 127 (Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges).

Output: Article Article 127 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) If at any time there should not be a quorum of the Judges of the Supreme Court available to hold or continue any session of the Court, the Chief J.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 127

तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 127 ('तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 127 भारत के संविधान में 'तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) If at any time there should not be a quorum of the Judges of the Supreme Court available to hold or continue any session of the Court, the Chief J...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 127

Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges

Input:
Premise: (1) If at any time there should not be a quorum of the Judges of the Supreme Court available to hold or continue any session of the Court, the Chief Justice of India may, with the previous consent of the President and after consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned, request in writing the attendance at the sittings of the Court, as an ad hoc Judge, for such period as may be necessary, of a Judge of a High Court duly qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court to be designated by the Chief Justice of India.
(2) It shall be the duty of the Judge who has been so designated, in priority to other duties of his office, to attend the sittings of the Supreme Court at the time and for the period for which his attendance is required, and while so attending he shall have all the jurisdiction, powers and privileges, and shall discharge the duties, of a Judge of the Supreme Court.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges' under Article 127.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 127

तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) If at any time there should not be a quorum of the Judges of the Supreme Court available to hold or continue any session of the Court, the Chief Justice of India may, with the previous consent of the President and after consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned, request in writing the attendance at the sittings of the Court, as an ad hoc Judge, for such period as may be necessary, of a Judge of a High Court duly qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court to be designated by the Chief Justice of India.
(2) It shall be the duty of the Judge who has been so designated, in priority to other duties of his office, to attend the sittings of the Supreme Court at the time and for the period for which his attendance is required, and while so attending he shall have all the jurisdiction, powers and privileges, and shall discharge the duties, of a Judge of the Supreme Court.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 127 के तहत 'तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 127

Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges

Input:
Premise: (1) If at any time there should not be a quorum of the Judges of the Supreme Court available to hold or continue any session of the Court, the Chief Justice of India may, with the previous consent of the President and after consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned, request in writing the attendance at the sittings of the Court, as an ad hoc Judge, for such period as may be necessary, of a Judge of a High Court duly qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court to be designated by the Chief Justice of India.
(2) It shall be the duty of the Judge who has been so designated, in priority to other duties of his office, to attend the sittings of the Supreme Court at the time and for the period for which his attendance is required, and while so attending he shall have all the jurisdiction, powers and privileges, and shall discharge the duties, of a Judge of the Supreme Court.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 127

तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) If at any time there should not be a quorum of the Judges of the Supreme Court available to hold or continue any session of the Court, the Chief Justice of India may, with the previous consent of the President and after consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned, request in writing the attendance at the sittings of the Court, as an ad hoc Judge, for such period as may be necessary, of a Judge of a High Court duly qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court to be designated by the Chief Justice of India.
(2) It shall be the duty of the Judge who has been so designated, in priority to other duties of his office, to attend the sittings of the Supreme Court at the time and for the period for which his attendance is required, and while so attending he shall have all the jurisdiction, powers and privileges, and shall discharge the duties, of a Judge of the Supreme Court.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 127

Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges

Input:
Premise: (1) If at any time there should not be a quorum of the Judges of the Supreme Court available to hold or continue any session of the Court, the Chief Justice of India may, with the previous consent of the President and after consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned, request in writing the attendance at the sittings of the Court, as an ad hoc Judge, for such period as may be necessary, of a Judge of a High Court duly qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court to be designated by the Chief Justice of India.
(2) It shall be the duty of the Judge who has been so designated, in priority to other duties of his office, to attend the sittings of the Supreme Court at the time and for the period for which his attendance is required, and while so attending he shall have all the jurisdiction, powers and privileges, and shall discharge the duties, of a Judge of the Supreme Court.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 127

तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) If at any time there should not be a quorum of the Judges of the Supreme Court available to hold or continue any session of the Court, the Chief Justice of India may, with the previous consent of the President and after consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned, request in writing the attendance at the sittings of the Court, as an ad hoc Judge, for such period as may be necessary, of a Judge of a High Court duly qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court to be designated by the Chief Justice of India.
(2) It shall be the duty of the Judge who has been so designated, in priority to other duties of his office, to attend the sittings of the Supreme Court at the time and for the period for which his attendance is required, and while so attending he shall have all the jurisdiction, powers and privileges, and shall discharge the duties, of a Judge of the Supreme Court.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 127

Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 127: Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges
Text: (1) If at any time there should not be a quorum of the Judges of the Supreme Court available to hold or continue any session of the Court, the Chief J...

Output: Judiciary

Explanation: Article 127 deals with 'Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Judiciary'.


Article 127

तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 127: तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति
पाठ: (1) If at any time there should not be a quorum of the Judges of the Supreme Court available to hold or continue any session of the Court, the Chief J...

Output: न्यायपालिका

Explanation: Article 127 'तदर्थ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'न्यायपालिका' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 128

Input: What does Article 128 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output:
Article 128 governs 'Attendance of Retired Judges at Sittings of the Supreme Court'. The constitutional text states: Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter, the Chief Justice of India may at any time, with the previous consent of the President, request any person who has held the office of a Judge of the Supreme Court or of the Federal Court or who has held the office of a Judge of a High Court and is duly qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court to sit and act as a Judge of the Supreme Court, and every such person so requested shall, while so sitting and acting, be entitled to such allowances as the President may by order determine and have all the jurisdiction, powers and privileges of, but shall not otherwise be deemed to be, a Judge of that Court:
Provided that nothing in this article shall be deemed to require any such person as aforesaid to sit and act as a Judge of that Court unless he consents so to do.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 128 is titled 'Attendance of Retired Judges at Sittings of the Supreme Court' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 128

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 128 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output:
Article 128 'उच्चतम न्यायालय की बैठकों में सेवानिवृत्त न्यायाधीशों की उपस्थिति' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter, the Chief Justice of India may at any time, with the previous consent of the President, request any person who has held the office of a Judge of the Supreme Court or of the Federal Court or who has held the office of a Judge of a High Court and is duly qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court to sit and act as a Judge of the Supreme Court, and every such person so requested shall, while so sitting and acting, be entitled to such allowances as the President may by order determine and have all the jurisdiction, powers and privileges of, but shall not otherwise be deemed to be, a Judge of that Court:
Provided that nothing in this article shall be deemed to require any such person as aforesaid to sit and act as a Judge of that Court unless he consents so to do.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 128 का शीर्षक 'उच्चतम न्यायालय की बैठकों में सेवानिवृत्त न्यायाधीशों की उपस्थिति' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 128

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Attendance of Retired Judges at Sittings of the Supreme Court'?

Output: Article 128

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Attendance of Retired Judges at Sittings of the Supreme Court' under the provisions of Article 128.


Article 128

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'उच्चतम न्यायालय की बैठकों में सेवानिवृत्त न्यायाधीशों की उपस्थिति' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 128

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 128 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'उच्चतम न्यायालय की बैठकों में सेवानिवृत्त न्यायाधीशों की उपस्थिति' स्थापित करता है।


Article 128

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Attendance of Retired Judges at Sittings of the Supreme Court'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 128.

Explanation: Article 128 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Attendance of Retired Judges at Sittings of the Supreme Court' under the Constitution of India.


Article 128

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'उच्चतम न्यायालय की बैठकों में सेवानिवृत्त न्यायाधीशों की उपस्थिति' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 128 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 128 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'उच्चतम न्यायालय की बैठकों में सेवानिवृत्त न्यायाधीशों की उपस्थिति' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 128

Input: Summarize Article 128 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 128 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Attendance of Retired Judges at Sittings of the Supreme Court'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 128

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 128 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 128 'उच्चतम न्यायालय की बैठकों में सेवानिवृत्त न्यायाधीशों की उपस्थिति' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 128

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 128 (Attendance of Retired Judges at Sittings of the Supreme Court).

Output: Article Article 128 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Attendance of Retired Judges at Sittings of the Supreme Court' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter, the Chief Justice of India may at any time, with the previous consent of the President, request any person w.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 128

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 128 ('उच्चतम न्यायालय की बैठकों में सेवानिवृत्त न्यायाधीशों की उपस्थिति') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 128 भारत के संविधान में 'उच्चतम न्यायालय की बैठकों में सेवानिवृत्त न्यायाधीशों की उपस्थिति' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter, the Chief Justice of India may at any time, with the previous consent of the President, request any person w...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 128

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter, the Chief Justice of India may at any time, with the previous consent of the President, request any person who has held the office of a Judge of the Supreme Court or of the Federal Court or who has held the office of a Judge of a High Court and is duly qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court to sit and act as a Judge of the Supreme Court, and every such person so requested shall, while so sitting and acting, be entitled to such allowances as the President may by order determine and have all the jurisdiction, powers and privileges of, but shall not otherwise be deemed to be, a Judge of that Court:
Provided that nothing in this article shall be deemed to require any such person as aforesaid to sit and act as a Judge of that Court unless he consents so to do.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Attendance of Retired Judges at Sittings of the Supreme Court' under Article 128.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 128

Input:
आधार (Premise): Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter, the Chief Justice of India may at any time, with the previous consent of the President, request any person who has held the office of a Judge of the Supreme Court or of the Federal Court or who has held the office of a Judge of a High Court and is duly qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court to sit and act as a Judge of the Supreme Court, and every such person so requested shall, while so sitting and acting, be entitled to such allowances as the President may by order determine and have all the jurisdiction, powers and privileges of, but shall not otherwise be deemed to be, a Judge of that Court:
Provided that nothing in this article shall be deemed to require any such person as aforesaid to sit and act as a Judge of that Court unless he consents so to do.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 128 के तहत 'उच्चतम न्यायालय की बैठकों में सेवानिवृत्त न्यायाधीशों की उपस्थिति' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 128

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter, the Chief Justice of India may at any time, with the previous consent of the President, request any person who has held the office of a Judge of the Supreme Court or of the Federal Court or who has held the office of a Judge of a High Court and is duly qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court to sit and act as a Judge of the Supreme Court, and every such person so requested shall, while so sitting and acting, be entitled to such allowances as the President may by order determine and have all the jurisdiction, powers and privileges of, but shall not otherwise be deemed to be, a Judge of that Court:
Provided that nothing in this article shall be deemed to require any such person as aforesaid to sit and act as a Judge of that Court unless he consents so to do.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Attendance of Retired Judges at Sittings of the Supreme Court'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 128

Input:
आधार (Premise): Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter, the Chief Justice of India may at any time, with the previous consent of the President, request any person who has held the office of a Judge of the Supreme Court or of the Federal Court or who has held the office of a Judge of a High Court and is duly qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court to sit and act as a Judge of the Supreme Court, and every such person so requested shall, while so sitting and acting, be entitled to such allowances as the President may by order determine and have all the jurisdiction, powers and privileges of, but shall not otherwise be deemed to be, a Judge of that Court:
Provided that nothing in this article shall be deemed to require any such person as aforesaid to sit and act as a Judge of that Court unless he consents so to do.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'उच्चतम न्यायालय की बैठकों में सेवानिवृत्त न्यायाधीशों की उपस्थिति' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 128

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter, the Chief Justice of India may at any time, with the previous consent of the President, request any person who has held the office of a Judge of the Supreme Court or of the Federal Court or who has held the office of a Judge of a High Court and is duly qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court to sit and act as a Judge of the Supreme Court, and every such person so requested shall, while so sitting and acting, be entitled to such allowances as the President may by order determine and have all the jurisdiction, powers and privileges of, but shall not otherwise be deemed to be, a Judge of that Court:
Provided that nothing in this article shall be deemed to require any such person as aforesaid to sit and act as a Judge of that Court unless he consents so to do.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 128

Input:
आधार (Premise): Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter, the Chief Justice of India may at any time, with the previous consent of the President, request any person who has held the office of a Judge of the Supreme Court or of the Federal Court or who has held the office of a Judge of a High Court and is duly qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court to sit and act as a Judge of the Supreme Court, and every such person so requested shall, while so sitting and acting, be entitled to such allowances as the President may by order determine and have all the jurisdiction, powers and privileges of, but shall not otherwise be deemed to be, a Judge of that Court:
Provided that nothing in this article shall be deemed to require any such person as aforesaid to sit and act as a Judge of that Court unless he consents so to do.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 128

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 128: Attendance of Retired Judges at Sittings of the Supreme Court
Text: Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter, the Chief Justice of India may at any time, with the previous consent of the President, request any person w...

Output: Judiciary

Explanation: Article 128 deals with 'Attendance of Retired Judges at Sittings of the Supreme Court' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Judiciary'.


Article 128

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 128: उच्चतम न्यायालय की बैठकों में सेवानिवृत्त न्यायाधीशों की उपस्थिति
पाठ: Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter, the Chief Justice of India may at any time, with the previous consent of the President, request any person w...

Output: न्यायपालिका

Explanation: Article 128 'उच्चतम न्यायालय की बैठकों में सेवानिवृत्त न्यायाधीशों की उपस्थिति' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'न्यायपालिका' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 129

Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record

Input: What does Article 129 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 129 governs 'Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record'. The constitutional text states: The Supreme Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 129 is titled 'Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 129

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 129 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 129 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय को अभिलेख न्यायालय बनाया जाएगा' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: The Supreme Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 129 का शीर्षक 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय को अभिलेख न्यायालय बनाया जाएगा' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 129

Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record'?

Output: Article 129

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record' under the provisions of Article 129.


Article 129

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय को अभिलेख न्यायालय बनाया जाएगा' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 129

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 129 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय को अभिलेख न्यायालय बनाया जाएगा' स्थापित करता है।


Article 129

Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 129.

Explanation: Article 129 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record' under the Constitution of India.


Article 129

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय को अभिलेख न्यायालय बनाया जाएगा' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 129 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 129 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय को अभिलेख न्यायालय बनाया जाएगा' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 129

Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record

Input: Summarize Article 129 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 129 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 129

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 129 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 129 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय को अभिलेख न्यायालय बनाया जाएगा' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 129

Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 129 (Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record).

Output: Article Article 129 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: The Supreme Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.. This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 129

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 129 ('सर्वोच्च न्यायालय को अभिलेख न्यायालय बनाया जाएगा') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 129 भारत के संविधान में 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय को अभिलेख न्यायालय बनाया जाएगा' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: The Supreme Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 129

Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record

Input:
Premise: The Supreme Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record' under Article 129.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 129

Input:
आधार (Premise): The Supreme Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 129 के तहत 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय को अभिलेख न्यायालय बनाया जाएगा' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 129

Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record

Input:
Premise: The Supreme Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 129

Input:
आधार (Premise): The Supreme Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'सर्वोच्च न्यायालय को अभिलेख न्यायालय बनाया जाएगा' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 129

Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record

Input:
Premise: The Supreme Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 129

Input:
आधार (Premise): The Supreme Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 129

Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 129: Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record
Text: The Supreme Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.

Output: Judiciary

Explanation: Article 129 deals with 'Supreme Court to Be a Court of Record' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Judiciary'.