Article 209

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'वित्तीय व्यवसाय के संबंध में राज्य के विधानमंडल में प्रक्रिया के कानून द्वारा विनियमन' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 209 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 209 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'वित्तीय व्यवसाय के संबंध में राज्य के विधानमंडल में प्रक्रिया के कानून द्वारा विनियमन' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 209

Regulation by Law of Procedure in the Legislature of the State in Relation to Financial Business

Input: Summarize Article 209 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 209 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Regulation by Law of Procedure in the Legislature of the State in Relation to Financial Business'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 209

वित्तीय व्यवसाय के संबंध में राज्य के विधानमंडल में प्रक्रिया के कानून द्वारा विनियमन

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 209 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 209 'वित्तीय व्यवसाय के संबंध में राज्य के विधानमंडल में प्रक्रिया के कानून द्वारा विनियमन' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 209

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 209 (Regulation by Law of Procedure in the Legislature of the State in Relation to Financial Business).

Output: Article Article 209 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Regulation by Law of Procedure in the Legislature of the State in Relation to Financial Business' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: The Legislature of a State may, for the purpose of the timely completion of financial business, regulate by law the procedure of, and the conduct of b.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 209

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 209 ('वित्तीय व्यवसाय के संबंध में राज्य के विधानमंडल में प्रक्रिया के कानून द्वारा विनियमन') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 209 भारत के संविधान में 'वित्तीय व्यवसाय के संबंध में राज्य के विधानमंडल में प्रक्रिया के कानून द्वारा विनियमन' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: The Legislature of a State may, for the purpose of the timely completion of financial business, regulate by law the procedure of, and the conduct of b...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 209

Input:
Premise: The Legislature of a State may, for the purpose of the timely completion of financial business, regulate by law the procedure of, and the conduct of business in, the House or Houses of the Legislature of the State in relation to any financial matter or to any Bill for the appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of the State, and, if and so far as any provision of any law so made is inconsistent with any rule made by the House or either House of the Legislature of the State under clause (1) of article 208 or with any rule or standing order having effect in relation to the Legislature of the State under clause (2) of that article, such provision shall prevail.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Regulation by Law of Procedure in the Legislature of the State in Relation to Financial Business' under Article 209.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 209

Input:
आधार (Premise): The Legislature of a State may, for the purpose of the timely completion of financial business, regulate by law the procedure of, and the conduct of business in, the House or Houses of the Legislature of the State in relation to any financial matter or to any Bill for the appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of the State, and, if and so far as any provision of any law so made is inconsistent with any rule made by the House or either House of the Legislature of the State under clause (1) of article 208 or with any rule or standing order having effect in relation to the Legislature of the State under clause (2) of that article, such provision shall prevail.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 209 के तहत 'वित्तीय व्यवसाय के संबंध में राज्य के विधानमंडल में प्रक्रिया के कानून द्वारा विनियमन' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 209

Input:
Premise: The Legislature of a State may, for the purpose of the timely completion of financial business, regulate by law the procedure of, and the conduct of business in, the House or Houses of the Legislature of the State in relation to any financial matter or to any Bill for the appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of the State, and, if and so far as any provision of any law so made is inconsistent with any rule made by the House or either House of the Legislature of the State under clause (1) of article 208 or with any rule or standing order having effect in relation to the Legislature of the State under clause (2) of that article, such provision shall prevail.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Regulation by Law of Procedure in the Legislature of the State in Relation to Financial Business'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 209

Input:
आधार (Premise): The Legislature of a State may, for the purpose of the timely completion of financial business, regulate by law the procedure of, and the conduct of business in, the House or Houses of the Legislature of the State in relation to any financial matter or to any Bill for the appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of the State, and, if and so far as any provision of any law so made is inconsistent with any rule made by the House or either House of the Legislature of the State under clause (1) of article 208 or with any rule or standing order having effect in relation to the Legislature of the State under clause (2) of that article, such provision shall prevail.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'वित्तीय व्यवसाय के संबंध में राज्य के विधानमंडल में प्रक्रिया के कानून द्वारा विनियमन' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 209

Input:
Premise: The Legislature of a State may, for the purpose of the timely completion of financial business, regulate by law the procedure of, and the conduct of business in, the House or Houses of the Legislature of the State in relation to any financial matter or to any Bill for the appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of the State, and, if and so far as any provision of any law so made is inconsistent with any rule made by the House or either House of the Legislature of the State under clause (1) of article 208 or with any rule or standing order having effect in relation to the Legislature of the State under clause (2) of that article, such provision shall prevail.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 209

Input:
आधार (Premise): The Legislature of a State may, for the purpose of the timely completion of financial business, regulate by law the procedure of, and the conduct of business in, the House or Houses of the Legislature of the State in relation to any financial matter or to any Bill for the appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of the State, and, if and so far as any provision of any law so made is inconsistent with any rule made by the House or either House of the Legislature of the State under clause (1) of article 208 or with any rule or standing order having effect in relation to the Legislature of the State under clause (2) of that article, such provision shall prevail.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 209

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 209: Regulation by Law of Procedure in the Legislature of the State in Relation to Financial Business
Text: The Legislature of a State may, for the purpose of the timely completion of financial business, regulate by law the procedure of, and the conduct of b...

Output: Federal Structure

Explanation: Article 209 deals with 'Regulation by Law of Procedure in the Legislature of the State in Relation to Financial Business' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Federal Structure'.


Article 209

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 209: वित्तीय व्यवसाय के संबंध में राज्य के विधानमंडल में प्रक्रिया के कानून द्वारा विनियमन
पाठ: The Legislature of a State may, for the purpose of the timely completion of financial business, regulate by law the procedure of, and the conduct of b...

Output: संवैधानिक संघ ढांचा

Explanation: Article 209 'वित्तीय व्यवसाय के संबंध में राज्य के विधानमंडल में प्रक्रिया के कानून द्वारा विनियमन' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'संवैधानिक संघ ढांचा' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 210

Language to Be Used in the Legislature

Input: What does Article 210 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 210 governs 'Language to Be Used in the Legislature'. The constitutional text states: (1) Notwithstanding anything in Part XVII, but subject to the provisions of article 348, business in the Legislature of a State shall be transacted in the official language or languages of the State or in Hindi or in English: Provided that the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly or Chairman of the Legislative Council, or person acting as such, as the case may be, may permit any member who cannot adequately express himself in any of the languages aforesaid to address the House in his mothertongue.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 210 is titled 'Language to Be Used in the Legislature' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 210

विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 210 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 210 'विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: (1) Notwithstanding anything in Part XVII, but subject to the provisions of article 348, business in the Legislature of a State shall be transacted in the official language or languages of the State or in Hindi or in English: Provided that the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly or Chairman of the Legislative Council, or person acting as such, as the case may be, may permit any member who cannot adequately express himself in any of the languages aforesaid to address the House in his mothertongue.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 210 का शीर्षक 'विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 210

Language to Be Used in the Legislature

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Language to Be Used in the Legislature'?

Output: Article 210

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Language to Be Used in the Legislature' under the provisions of Article 210.


Article 210

विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 210

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 210 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा' स्थापित करता है।


Article 210

Language to Be Used in the Legislature

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Language to Be Used in the Legislature'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 210.

Explanation: Article 210 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Language to Be Used in the Legislature' under the Constitution of India.


Article 210

विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 210 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 210 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 210

Language to Be Used in the Legislature

Input: Summarize Article 210 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 210 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Language to Be Used in the Legislature'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 210

विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 210 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 210 'विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 210

Language to Be Used in the Legislature

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 210 (Language to Be Used in the Legislature).

Output: Article Article 210 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Language to Be Used in the Legislature' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) Notwithstanding anything in Part XVII, but subject to the provisions of article 348, business in the Legislature of a State shall be transacted in.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 210

विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 210 ('विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 210 भारत के संविधान में 'विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) Notwithstanding anything in Part XVII, but subject to the provisions of article 348, business in the Legislature of a State shall be transacted in...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 210

Language to Be Used in the Legislature

Input:
Premise: (1) Notwithstanding anything in Part XVII, but subject to the provisions of article 348, business in the Legislature of a State shall be transacted in the official language or languages of the State or in Hindi or in English: Provided that the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly or Chairman of the Legislative Council, or person acting as such, as the case may be, may permit any member who cannot adequately express himself in any of the languages aforesaid to address the House in his mothertongue.
(2) Unless the Legislature of the State by law otherwise provides, this article shall, after the expiration of a period of fifteen years from the commencement of this Constitution, have effect as if the words “or in English” were omitted therefrom:
Provided that in relation to the Legislatures of the States of Himachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya and Tripura this clause shall have effect as if for the words “fifteen years” occurring therein, the words “twenty-five years” were substituted:
Provided further that in relation to the Legislatures of the States of Arunachal Pradesh, Goa and Mizoram, this clause shall have effect as if for the words “fifteen years” occurring therein, the words “forty years” were substituted.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Language to Be Used in the Legislature' under Article 210.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 210

विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Notwithstanding anything in Part XVII, but subject to the provisions of article 348, business in the Legislature of a State shall be transacted in the official language or languages of the State or in Hindi or in English: Provided that the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly or Chairman of the Legislative Council, or person acting as such, as the case may be, may permit any member who cannot adequately express himself in any of the languages aforesaid to address the House in his mothertongue.
(2) Unless the Legislature of the State by law otherwise provides, this article shall, after the expiration of a period of fifteen years from the commencement of this Constitution, have effect as if the words “or in English” were omitted therefrom:
Provided that in relation to the Legislatures of the States of Himachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya and Tripura this clause shall have effect as if for the words “fifteen years” occurring therein, the words “twenty-five years” were substituted:
Provided further that in relation to the Legislatures of the States of Arunachal Pradesh, Goa and Mizoram, this clause shall have effect as if for the words “fifteen years” occurring therein, the words “forty years” were substituted.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 210 के तहत 'विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 210

Language to Be Used in the Legislature

Input:
Premise: (1) Notwithstanding anything in Part XVII, but subject to the provisions of article 348, business in the Legislature of a State shall be transacted in the official language or languages of the State or in Hindi or in English: Provided that the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly or Chairman of the Legislative Council, or person acting as such, as the case may be, may permit any member who cannot adequately express himself in any of the languages aforesaid to address the House in his mothertongue.
(2) Unless the Legislature of the State by law otherwise provides, this article shall, after the expiration of a period of fifteen years from the commencement of this Constitution, have effect as if the words “or in English” were omitted therefrom:
Provided that in relation to the Legislatures of the States of Himachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya and Tripura this clause shall have effect as if for the words “fifteen years” occurring therein, the words “twenty-five years” were substituted:
Provided further that in relation to the Legislatures of the States of Arunachal Pradesh, Goa and Mizoram, this clause shall have effect as if for the words “fifteen years” occurring therein, the words “forty years” were substituted.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Language to Be Used in the Legislature'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 210

विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Notwithstanding anything in Part XVII, but subject to the provisions of article 348, business in the Legislature of a State shall be transacted in the official language or languages of the State or in Hindi or in English: Provided that the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly or Chairman of the Legislative Council, or person acting as such, as the case may be, may permit any member who cannot adequately express himself in any of the languages aforesaid to address the House in his mothertongue.
(2) Unless the Legislature of the State by law otherwise provides, this article shall, after the expiration of a period of fifteen years from the commencement of this Constitution, have effect as if the words “or in English” were omitted therefrom:
Provided that in relation to the Legislatures of the States of Himachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya and Tripura this clause shall have effect as if for the words “fifteen years” occurring therein, the words “twenty-five years” were substituted:
Provided further that in relation to the Legislatures of the States of Arunachal Pradesh, Goa and Mizoram, this clause shall have effect as if for the words “fifteen years” occurring therein, the words “forty years” were substituted.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 210

Language to Be Used in the Legislature

Input:
Premise: (1) Notwithstanding anything in Part XVII, but subject to the provisions of article 348, business in the Legislature of a State shall be transacted in the official language or languages of the State or in Hindi or in English: Provided that the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly or Chairman of the Legislative Council, or person acting as such, as the case may be, may permit any member who cannot adequately express himself in any of the languages aforesaid to address the House in his mothertongue.
(2) Unless the Legislature of the State by law otherwise provides, this article shall, after the expiration of a period of fifteen years from the commencement of this Constitution, have effect as if the words “or in English” were omitted therefrom:
Provided that in relation to the Legislatures of the States of Himachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya and Tripura this clause shall have effect as if for the words “fifteen years” occurring therein, the words “twenty-five years” were substituted:
Provided further that in relation to the Legislatures of the States of Arunachal Pradesh, Goa and Mizoram, this clause shall have effect as if for the words “fifteen years” occurring therein, the words “forty years” were substituted.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 210

विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Notwithstanding anything in Part XVII, but subject to the provisions of article 348, business in the Legislature of a State shall be transacted in the official language or languages of the State or in Hindi or in English: Provided that the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly or Chairman of the Legislative Council, or person acting as such, as the case may be, may permit any member who cannot adequately express himself in any of the languages aforesaid to address the House in his mothertongue.
(2) Unless the Legislature of the State by law otherwise provides, this article shall, after the expiration of a period of fifteen years from the commencement of this Constitution, have effect as if the words “or in English” were omitted therefrom:
Provided that in relation to the Legislatures of the States of Himachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya and Tripura this clause shall have effect as if for the words “fifteen years” occurring therein, the words “twenty-five years” were substituted:
Provided further that in relation to the Legislatures of the States of Arunachal Pradesh, Goa and Mizoram, this clause shall have effect as if for the words “fifteen years” occurring therein, the words “forty years” were substituted.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 210

Language to Be Used in the Legislature

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 210: Language to Be Used in the Legislature
Text: (1) Notwithstanding anything in Part XVII, but subject to the provisions of article 348, business in the Legislature of a State shall be transacted in...

Output: Federal Structure

Explanation: Article 210 deals with 'Language to Be Used in the Legislature' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Federal Structure'.


Article 210

विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 210: विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा
पाठ: (1) Notwithstanding anything in Part XVII, but subject to the provisions of article 348, business in the Legislature of a State shall be transacted in...

Output: संवैधानिक संघ ढांचा

Explanation: Article 210 'विधानमंडल में प्रयुक्त होने वाली भाषा' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'संवैधानिक संघ ढांचा' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 211

Input: What does Article 211 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 211 governs 'Restriction on Discussion in the Legislature'. The constitutional text states: No discussion shall take place in the Legislature of a State with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 211 is titled 'Restriction on Discussion in the Legislature' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 211

विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 211 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 211 'विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: No discussion shall take place in the Legislature of a State with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 211 का शीर्षक 'विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 211

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Restriction on Discussion in the Legislature'?

Output: Article 211

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Restriction on Discussion in the Legislature' under the provisions of Article 211.


Article 211

विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 211

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 211 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध' स्थापित करता है।


Article 211

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Restriction on Discussion in the Legislature'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 211.

Explanation: Article 211 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Restriction on Discussion in the Legislature' under the Constitution of India.


Article 211

विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 211 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 211 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 211

Input: Summarize Article 211 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 211 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Restriction on Discussion in the Legislature'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 211

विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 211 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 211 'विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 211

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 211 (Restriction on Discussion in the Legislature).

Output: Article Article 211 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Restriction on Discussion in the Legislature' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: No discussion shall take place in the Legislature of a State with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the d.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 211

विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 211 ('विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 211 भारत के संविधान में 'विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: No discussion shall take place in the Legislature of a State with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the d...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 211

Input:
Premise: No discussion shall take place in the Legislature of a State with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Restriction on Discussion in the Legislature' under Article 211.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 211

विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध

Input:
आधार (Premise): No discussion shall take place in the Legislature of a State with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 211 के तहत 'विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 211

Input:
Premise: No discussion shall take place in the Legislature of a State with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Restriction on Discussion in the Legislature'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 211

विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध

Input:
आधार (Premise): No discussion shall take place in the Legislature of a State with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 211

Input:
Premise: No discussion shall take place in the Legislature of a State with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 211

विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध

Input:
आधार (Premise): No discussion shall take place in the Legislature of a State with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 211

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 211: Restriction on Discussion in the Legislature
Text: No discussion shall take place in the Legislature of a State with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the d...

Output: Federal Structure

Explanation: Article 211 deals with 'Restriction on Discussion in the Legislature' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Federal Structure'.


Article 211

विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 211: विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध
पाठ: No discussion shall take place in the Legislature of a State with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the d...

Output: संवैधानिक संघ ढांचा

Explanation: Article 211 'विधानमंडल में चर्चा पर प्रतिबंध' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'संवैधानिक संघ ढांचा' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 212

Input: What does Article 212 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 212 governs 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of the Legislature'. The constitutional text states: (1) The validity of any proceedings in the Legislature of a State shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 212 is titled 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of the Legislature' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 212

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 212 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 212 'न्यायालय विधानमंडल की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगे' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: (1) The validity of any proceedings in the Legislature of a State shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 212 का शीर्षक 'न्यायालय विधानमंडल की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगे' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 212

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of the Legislature'?

Output: Article 212

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of the Legislature' under the provisions of Article 212.


Article 212

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'न्यायालय विधानमंडल की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगे' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 212

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 212 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'न्यायालय विधानमंडल की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगे' स्थापित करता है।


Article 212

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of the Legislature'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 212.

Explanation: Article 212 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of the Legislature' under the Constitution of India.


Article 212

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'न्यायालय विधानमंडल की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगे' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 212 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 212 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'न्यायालय विधानमंडल की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगे' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 212

Input: Summarize Article 212 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 212 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of the Legislature'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 212

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 212 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 212 'न्यायालय विधानमंडल की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगे' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 212

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 212 (Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of the Legislature).

Output: Article Article 212 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of the Legislature' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) The validity of any proceedings in the Legislature of a State shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedu.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 212

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 212 ('न्यायालय विधानमंडल की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगे') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 212 भारत के संविधान में 'न्यायालय विधानमंडल की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगे' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) The validity of any proceedings in the Legislature of a State shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedu...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 212

Input:
Premise: (1) The validity of any proceedings in the Legislature of a State shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.
(2) No officer or member of the Legislature of a State in whom powers are vested by or under this Constitution for regulating procedure or the conduct of business, or for maintaining order, in the Legislature shall be subject to the jurisdiction of any court in respect of the exercise by him of those powers.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of the Legislature' under Article 212.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 212

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The validity of any proceedings in the Legislature of a State shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.
(2) No officer or member of the Legislature of a State in whom powers are vested by or under this Constitution for regulating procedure or the conduct of business, or for maintaining order, in the Legislature shall be subject to the jurisdiction of any court in respect of the exercise by him of those powers.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 212 के तहत 'न्यायालय विधानमंडल की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगे' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 212

Input:
Premise: (1) The validity of any proceedings in the Legislature of a State shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.
(2) No officer or member of the Legislature of a State in whom powers are vested by or under this Constitution for regulating procedure or the conduct of business, or for maintaining order, in the Legislature shall be subject to the jurisdiction of any court in respect of the exercise by him of those powers.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of the Legislature'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 212

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The validity of any proceedings in the Legislature of a State shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.
(2) No officer or member of the Legislature of a State in whom powers are vested by or under this Constitution for regulating procedure or the conduct of business, or for maintaining order, in the Legislature shall be subject to the jurisdiction of any court in respect of the exercise by him of those powers.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'न्यायालय विधानमंडल की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगे' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 212

Input:
Premise: (1) The validity of any proceedings in the Legislature of a State shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.
(2) No officer or member of the Legislature of a State in whom powers are vested by or under this Constitution for regulating procedure or the conduct of business, or for maintaining order, in the Legislature shall be subject to the jurisdiction of any court in respect of the exercise by him of those powers.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 212

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The validity of any proceedings in the Legislature of a State shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedure.
(2) No officer or member of the Legislature of a State in whom powers are vested by or under this Constitution for regulating procedure or the conduct of business, or for maintaining order, in the Legislature shall be subject to the jurisdiction of any court in respect of the exercise by him of those powers.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 212

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 212: Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of the Legislature
Text: (1) The validity of any proceedings in the Legislature of a State shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedu...

Output: Federal Structure

Explanation: Article 212 deals with 'Courts Not to Inquire Into Proceedings of the Legislature' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Federal Structure'.


Article 212

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 212: न्यायालय विधानमंडल की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगे
पाठ: (1) The validity of any proceedings in the Legislature of a State shall not be called in question on the ground of any alleged irregularity of procedu...

Output: संवैधानिक संघ ढांचा

Explanation: Article 212 'न्यायालय विधानमंडल की कार्यवाही की जांच नहीं करेंगे' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'संवैधानिक संघ ढांचा' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 213

Input: What does Article 213 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output:
Article 213 governs 'Power of Governor to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Legislature'. The constitutional text states: (1) If at any time, except when the Legislative Assembly of a State is in session, or where there is a Legislative Council in a State, except when both Houses of the Legislature are in session, the Governor is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinances as the circumstances appear to him to require:
Provided that the Governor shall not, without instructions from the President, promulgate any such Ordinance if —
(a) a Bill containing the same provisions would under this Constitution have required the previous sanction of the President for the introduction thereof into the Legislature; or
(b) he would have deemed it necessary to reserve a Bill containing the same provisions for the consideration of the President; or
(c) an Act of the Legislature of the State containing the same provisions would under this Constitution have been invalid unless, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, it had received the assent of the President.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 213 is titled 'Power of Governor to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Legislature' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 213

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 213 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output:
Article 213 'विधानमंडल के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राज्यपाल की शक्ति' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: (1) If at any time, except when the Legislative Assembly of a State is in session, or where there is a Legislative Council in a State, except when both Houses of the Legislature are in session, the Governor is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinances as the circumstances appear to him to require:
Provided that the Governor shall not, without instructions from the President, promulgate any such Ordinance if —
(a) a Bill containing the same provisions would under this Constitution have required the previous sanction of the President for the introduction thereof into the Legislature; or
(b) he would have deemed it necessary to reserve a Bill containing the same provisions for the consideration of the President; or
(c) an Act of the Legislature of the State containing the same provisions would under this Constitution have been invalid unless, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, it had received the assent of the President.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 213 का शीर्षक 'विधानमंडल के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राज्यपाल की शक्ति' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 213

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Power of Governor to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Legislature'?

Output: Article 213

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Power of Governor to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Legislature' under the provisions of Article 213.


Article 213

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'विधानमंडल के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राज्यपाल की शक्ति' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 213

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 213 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'विधानमंडल के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राज्यपाल की शक्ति' स्थापित करता है।


Article 213

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Power of Governor to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Legislature'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 213.

Explanation: Article 213 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Power of Governor to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Legislature' under the Constitution of India.


Article 213

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'विधानमंडल के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राज्यपाल की शक्ति' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 213 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 213 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'विधानमंडल के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राज्यपाल की शक्ति' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 213

Input: Summarize Article 213 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 213 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Power of Governor to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Legislature'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 213

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 213 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 213 'विधानमंडल के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राज्यपाल की शक्ति' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 213

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 213 (Power of Governor to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Legislature).

Output: Article Article 213 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Power of Governor to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Legislature' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) If at any time, except when the Legislative Assembly of a State is in session, or where there is a Legislative Council in a State, except when bot.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 213

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 213 ('विधानमंडल के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राज्यपाल की शक्ति') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 213 भारत के संविधान में 'विधानमंडल के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राज्यपाल की शक्ति' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) If at any time, except when the Legislative Assembly of a State is in session, or where there is a Legislative Council in a State, except when bot...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 213

Input:
Premise: (1) If at any time, except when the Legislative Assembly of a State is in session, or where there is a Legislative Council in a State, except when both Houses of the Legislature are in session, the Governor is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinances as the circumstances appear to him to require:
Provided that the Governor shall not, without instructions from the President, promulgate any such Ordinance if —
(a) a Bill containing the same provisions would under this Constitution have required the previous sanction of the President for the introduction thereof into the Legislature; or
(b) he would have deemed it necessary to reserve a Bill containing the same provisions for the consideration of the President; or
(c) an Act of the Legislature of the State containing the same provisions would under this Constitution have been invalid unless, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, it had received the assent of the President.
(2) An Ordinance promulgated under this article shall have the same force and effect as an Act of the Legislature of the State assented to by the Governor, but every such Ordinance —
(a) shall be laid before the Legislative Assembly of the State, or where there is a Legislative Council in the State, before both the Houses, and shall cease to operate at the expiration of six weeks from the reassembly of the Legislature, or if before the expiration of that period a resolution disapproving it is passed by the Legislative Assembly and agreed to by the Legislative Council, if any, upon the passing of the resolution or, as the case may be, on the resolution being agreed to by the Council; and
(b) may be withdrawn at any time by the Governor.
Explanation — Where the Houses of the Legislature of a State having a Legislative Council are summoned to reassemble on different dates, the period of six weeks shall be reckoned from the later of those dates for the purposes of this clause.
(3) If and so far as an Ordinance under this article makes any provision which would not be valid if enacted in an Act of the Legislature of the State assented to by the Governor, it shall be void:
Provided that, for the purposes of the provisions of this Constitution relating to the effect of an Act of the Legislature of a State which is repugnant to an Act of Parliament or an existing law with respect to a matter enumerated in the Concurrent List, an Ordinance promulgated under this article in pursuance of instructions from the President shall be deemed to be an Act of the Legislature of the State which has been reserved for the consideration of the President and assented to by him.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Power of Governor to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Legislature' under Article 213.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 213

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) If at any time, except when the Legislative Assembly of a State is in session, or where there is a Legislative Council in a State, except when both Houses of the Legislature are in session, the Governor is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinances as the circumstances appear to him to require:
Provided that the Governor shall not, without instructions from the President, promulgate any such Ordinance if —
(a) a Bill containing the same provisions would under this Constitution have required the previous sanction of the President for the introduction thereof into the Legislature; or
(b) he would have deemed it necessary to reserve a Bill containing the same provisions for the consideration of the President; or
(c) an Act of the Legislature of the State containing the same provisions would under this Constitution have been invalid unless, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, it had received the assent of the President.
(2) An Ordinance promulgated under this article shall have the same force and effect as an Act of the Legislature of the State assented to by the Governor, but every such Ordinance —
(a) shall be laid before the Legislative Assembly of the State, or where there is a Legislative Council in the State, before both the Houses, and shall cease to operate at the expiration of six weeks from the reassembly of the Legislature, or if before the expiration of that period a resolution disapproving it is passed by the Legislative Assembly and agreed to by the Legislative Council, if any, upon the passing of the resolution or, as the case may be, on the resolution being agreed to by the Council; and
(b) may be withdrawn at any time by the Governor.
Explanation — Where the Houses of the Legislature of a State having a Legislative Council are summoned to reassemble on different dates, the period of six weeks shall be reckoned from the later of those dates for the purposes of this clause.
(3) If and so far as an Ordinance under this article makes any provision which would not be valid if enacted in an Act of the Legislature of the State assented to by the Governor, it shall be void:
Provided that, for the purposes of the provisions of this Constitution relating to the effect of an Act of the Legislature of a State which is repugnant to an Act of Parliament or an existing law with respect to a matter enumerated in the Concurrent List, an Ordinance promulgated under this article in pursuance of instructions from the President shall be deemed to be an Act of the Legislature of the State which has been reserved for the consideration of the President and assented to by him.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 213 के तहत 'विधानमंडल के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राज्यपाल की शक्ति' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 213

Input:
Premise: (1) If at any time, except when the Legislative Assembly of a State is in session, or where there is a Legislative Council in a State, except when both Houses of the Legislature are in session, the Governor is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinances as the circumstances appear to him to require:
Provided that the Governor shall not, without instructions from the President, promulgate any such Ordinance if —
(a) a Bill containing the same provisions would under this Constitution have required the previous sanction of the President for the introduction thereof into the Legislature; or
(b) he would have deemed it necessary to reserve a Bill containing the same provisions for the consideration of the President; or
(c) an Act of the Legislature of the State containing the same provisions would under this Constitution have been invalid unless, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, it had received the assent of the President.
(2) An Ordinance promulgated under this article shall have the same force and effect as an Act of the Legislature of the State assented to by the Governor, but every such Ordinance —
(a) shall be laid before the Legislative Assembly of the State, or where there is a Legislative Council in the State, before both the Houses, and shall cease to operate at the expiration of six weeks from the reassembly of the Legislature, or if before the expiration of that period a resolution disapproving it is passed by the Legislative Assembly and agreed to by the Legislative Council, if any, upon the passing of the resolution or, as the case may be, on the resolution being agreed to by the Council; and
(b) may be withdrawn at any time by the Governor.
Explanation — Where the Houses of the Legislature of a State having a Legislative Council are summoned to reassemble on different dates, the period of six weeks shall be reckoned from the later of those dates for the purposes of this clause.
(3) If and so far as an Ordinance under this article makes any provision which would not be valid if enacted in an Act of the Legislature of the State assented to by the Governor, it shall be void:
Provided that, for the purposes of the provisions of this Constitution relating to the effect of an Act of the Legislature of a State which is repugnant to an Act of Parliament or an existing law with respect to a matter enumerated in the Concurrent List, an Ordinance promulgated under this article in pursuance of instructions from the President shall be deemed to be an Act of the Legislature of the State which has been reserved for the consideration of the President and assented to by him.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Power of Governor to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Legislature'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 213

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) If at any time, except when the Legislative Assembly of a State is in session, or where there is a Legislative Council in a State, except when both Houses of the Legislature are in session, the Governor is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinances as the circumstances appear to him to require:
Provided that the Governor shall not, without instructions from the President, promulgate any such Ordinance if —
(a) a Bill containing the same provisions would under this Constitution have required the previous sanction of the President for the introduction thereof into the Legislature; or
(b) he would have deemed it necessary to reserve a Bill containing the same provisions for the consideration of the President; or
(c) an Act of the Legislature of the State containing the same provisions would under this Constitution have been invalid unless, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, it had received the assent of the President.
(2) An Ordinance promulgated under this article shall have the same force and effect as an Act of the Legislature of the State assented to by the Governor, but every such Ordinance —
(a) shall be laid before the Legislative Assembly of the State, or where there is a Legislative Council in the State, before both the Houses, and shall cease to operate at the expiration of six weeks from the reassembly of the Legislature, or if before the expiration of that period a resolution disapproving it is passed by the Legislative Assembly and agreed to by the Legislative Council, if any, upon the passing of the resolution or, as the case may be, on the resolution being agreed to by the Council; and
(b) may be withdrawn at any time by the Governor.
Explanation — Where the Houses of the Legislature of a State having a Legislative Council are summoned to reassemble on different dates, the period of six weeks shall be reckoned from the later of those dates for the purposes of this clause.
(3) If and so far as an Ordinance under this article makes any provision which would not be valid if enacted in an Act of the Legislature of the State assented to by the Governor, it shall be void:
Provided that, for the purposes of the provisions of this Constitution relating to the effect of an Act of the Legislature of a State which is repugnant to an Act of Parliament or an existing law with respect to a matter enumerated in the Concurrent List, an Ordinance promulgated under this article in pursuance of instructions from the President shall be deemed to be an Act of the Legislature of the State which has been reserved for the consideration of the President and assented to by him.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'विधानमंडल के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राज्यपाल की शक्ति' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 213

Input:
Premise: (1) If at any time, except when the Legislative Assembly of a State is in session, or where there is a Legislative Council in a State, except when both Houses of the Legislature are in session, the Governor is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinances as the circumstances appear to him to require:
Provided that the Governor shall not, without instructions from the President, promulgate any such Ordinance if —
(a) a Bill containing the same provisions would under this Constitution have required the previous sanction of the President for the introduction thereof into the Legislature; or
(b) he would have deemed it necessary to reserve a Bill containing the same provisions for the consideration of the President; or
(c) an Act of the Legislature of the State containing the same provisions would under this Constitution have been invalid unless, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, it had received the assent of the President.
(2) An Ordinance promulgated under this article shall have the same force and effect as an Act of the Legislature of the State assented to by the Governor, but every such Ordinance —
(a) shall be laid before the Legislative Assembly of the State, or where there is a Legislative Council in the State, before both the Houses, and shall cease to operate at the expiration of six weeks from the reassembly of the Legislature, or if before the expiration of that period a resolution disapproving it is passed by the Legislative Assembly and agreed to by the Legislative Council, if any, upon the passing of the resolution or, as the case may be, on the resolution being agreed to by the Council; and
(b) may be withdrawn at any time by the Governor.
Explanation — Where the Houses of the Legislature of a State having a Legislative Council are summoned to reassemble on different dates, the period of six weeks shall be reckoned from the later of those dates for the purposes of this clause.
(3) If and so far as an Ordinance under this article makes any provision which would not be valid if enacted in an Act of the Legislature of the State assented to by the Governor, it shall be void:
Provided that, for the purposes of the provisions of this Constitution relating to the effect of an Act of the Legislature of a State which is repugnant to an Act of Parliament or an existing law with respect to a matter enumerated in the Concurrent List, an Ordinance promulgated under this article in pursuance of instructions from the President shall be deemed to be an Act of the Legislature of the State which has been reserved for the consideration of the President and assented to by him.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 213

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) If at any time, except when the Legislative Assembly of a State is in session, or where there is a Legislative Council in a State, except when both Houses of the Legislature are in session, the Governor is satisfied that circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such Ordinances as the circumstances appear to him to require:
Provided that the Governor shall not, without instructions from the President, promulgate any such Ordinance if —
(a) a Bill containing the same provisions would under this Constitution have required the previous sanction of the President for the introduction thereof into the Legislature; or
(b) he would have deemed it necessary to reserve a Bill containing the same provisions for the consideration of the President; or
(c) an Act of the Legislature of the State containing the same provisions would under this Constitution have been invalid unless, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, it had received the assent of the President.
(2) An Ordinance promulgated under this article shall have the same force and effect as an Act of the Legislature of the State assented to by the Governor, but every such Ordinance —
(a) shall be laid before the Legislative Assembly of the State, or where there is a Legislative Council in the State, before both the Houses, and shall cease to operate at the expiration of six weeks from the reassembly of the Legislature, or if before the expiration of that period a resolution disapproving it is passed by the Legislative Assembly and agreed to by the Legislative Council, if any, upon the passing of the resolution or, as the case may be, on the resolution being agreed to by the Council; and
(b) may be withdrawn at any time by the Governor.
Explanation — Where the Houses of the Legislature of a State having a Legislative Council are summoned to reassemble on different dates, the period of six weeks shall be reckoned from the later of those dates for the purposes of this clause.
(3) If and so far as an Ordinance under this article makes any provision which would not be valid if enacted in an Act of the Legislature of the State assented to by the Governor, it shall be void:
Provided that, for the purposes of the provisions of this Constitution relating to the effect of an Act of the Legislature of a State which is repugnant to an Act of Parliament or an existing law with respect to a matter enumerated in the Concurrent List, an Ordinance promulgated under this article in pursuance of instructions from the President shall be deemed to be an Act of the Legislature of the State which has been reserved for the consideration of the President and assented to by him.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 213

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 213: Power of Governor to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Legislature
Text: (1) If at any time, except when the Legislative Assembly of a State is in session, or where there is a Legislative Council in a State, except when bot...

Output: Federal Structure

Explanation: Article 213 deals with 'Power of Governor to Promulgate Ordinances During Recess of Legislature' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Federal Structure'.


Article 213

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 213: विधानमंडल के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राज्यपाल की शक्ति
पाठ: (1) If at any time, except when the Legislative Assembly of a State is in session, or where there is a Legislative Council in a State, except when bot...

Output: संवैधानिक संघ ढांचा

Explanation: Article 213 'विधानमंडल के अवकाश के दौरान अध्यादेश जारी करने की राज्यपाल की शक्ति' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'संवैधानिक संघ ढांचा' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 214

High Courts for States

Input: What does Article 214 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 214 governs 'High Courts for States'. The constitutional text states: There shall be a High Court for each State.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 214 is titled 'High Courts for States' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 214

राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 214 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 214 'राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: There shall be a High Court for each State.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 214 का शीर्षक 'राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 214

High Courts for States

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'High Courts for States'?

Output: Article 214

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'High Courts for States' under the provisions of Article 214.


Article 214

राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 214

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 214 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय' स्थापित करता है।


Article 214

High Courts for States

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'High Courts for States'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 214.

Explanation: Article 214 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'High Courts for States' under the Constitution of India.


Article 214

राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 214 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 214 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 214

High Courts for States

Input: Summarize Article 214 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 214 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'High Courts for States'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 214

राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 214 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 214 'राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 214

High Courts for States

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 214 (High Courts for States).

Output: Article Article 214 establishes the fundamental framework for 'High Courts for States' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: There shall be a High Court for each State.. This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 214

राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 214 ('राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 214 भारत के संविधान में 'राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: There shall be a High Court for each State.। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 214

High Courts for States

Input:
Premise: There shall be a High Court for each State.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'High Courts for States' under Article 214.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 214

राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय

Input:
आधार (Premise): There shall be a High Court for each State.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 214 के तहत 'राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 214

High Courts for States

Input:
Premise: There shall be a High Court for each State.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'High Courts for States'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 214

राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय

Input:
आधार (Premise): There shall be a High Court for each State.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 214

High Courts for States

Input:
Premise: There shall be a High Court for each State.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 214

राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय

Input:
आधार (Premise): There shall be a High Court for each State.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 214

High Courts for States

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 214: High Courts for States
Text: There shall be a High Court for each State.

Output: Judiciary

Explanation: Article 214 deals with 'High Courts for States' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Judiciary'.


Article 214

राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 214: राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय
पाठ: There shall be a High Court for each State.

Output: न्यायपालिका

Explanation: Article 214 'राज्यों के लिए उच्च न्यायालय' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'न्यायपालिका' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 215

High Courts to Be Courts of Record

Input: What does Article 215 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 215 governs 'High Courts to Be Courts of Record'. The constitutional text states: Every High Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 215 is titled 'High Courts to Be Courts of Record' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 215

उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 215 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 215 'उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: Every High Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 215 का शीर्षक 'उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 215

High Courts to Be Courts of Record

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'High Courts to Be Courts of Record'?

Output: Article 215

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'High Courts to Be Courts of Record' under the provisions of Article 215.


Article 215

उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 215

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 215 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे' स्थापित करता है।


Article 215

High Courts to Be Courts of Record

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'High Courts to Be Courts of Record'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 215.

Explanation: Article 215 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'High Courts to Be Courts of Record' under the Constitution of India.


Article 215

उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 215 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 215 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 215

High Courts to Be Courts of Record

Input: Summarize Article 215 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 215 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'High Courts to Be Courts of Record'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 215

उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 215 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 215 'उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 215

High Courts to Be Courts of Record

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 215 (High Courts to Be Courts of Record).

Output: Article Article 215 establishes the fundamental framework for 'High Courts to Be Courts of Record' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Every High Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.. This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 215

उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 215 ('उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 215 भारत के संविधान में 'उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Every High Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 215

High Courts to Be Courts of Record

Input:
Premise: Every High Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'High Courts to Be Courts of Record' under Article 215.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 215

उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे

Input:
आधार (Premise): Every High Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 215 के तहत 'उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 215

High Courts to Be Courts of Record

Input:
Premise: Every High Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'High Courts to Be Courts of Record'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 215

उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे

Input:
आधार (Premise): Every High Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 215

High Courts to Be Courts of Record

Input:
Premise: Every High Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 215

उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे

Input:
आधार (Premise): Every High Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 215

High Courts to Be Courts of Record

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 215: High Courts to Be Courts of Record
Text: Every High Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.

Output: Judiciary

Explanation: Article 215 deals with 'High Courts to Be Courts of Record' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Judiciary'.


Article 215

उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 215: उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे
पाठ: Every High Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of such a court including the power to punish for contempt of itself.

Output: न्यायपालिका

Explanation: Article 215 'उच्च न्यायालय रिकार्ड न्यायालय बनेंगे' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'न्यायपालिका' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 216

Constitution of High Courts

Input: What does Article 216 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 216 governs 'Constitution of High Courts'. The constitutional text states: Every High Court shall consist of a Chief Justice and such other Judges as the President may from time to time deem it necessary to appoint.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 216 is titled 'Constitution of High Courts' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 216

उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 216 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 216 'उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: Every High Court shall consist of a Chief Justice and such other Judges as the President may from time to time deem it necessary to appoint.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 216 का शीर्षक 'उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 216

Constitution of High Courts

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Constitution of High Courts'?

Output: Article 216

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Constitution of High Courts' under the provisions of Article 216.


Article 216

उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 216

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 216 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन' स्थापित करता है।


Article 216

Constitution of High Courts

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Constitution of High Courts'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 216.

Explanation: Article 216 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Constitution of High Courts' under the Constitution of India.


Article 216

उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 216 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 216 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 216

Constitution of High Courts

Input: Summarize Article 216 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 216 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Constitution of High Courts'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 216

उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 216 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 216 'उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 216

Constitution of High Courts

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 216 (Constitution of High Courts).

Output: Article Article 216 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Constitution of High Courts' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Every High Court shall consist of a Chief Justice and such other Judges as the President may from time to time deem it necessary to appoint.. This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 216

उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 216 ('उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 216 भारत के संविधान में 'उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Every High Court shall consist of a Chief Justice and such other Judges as the President may from time to time deem it necessary to appoint.। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 216

Constitution of High Courts

Input:
Premise: Every High Court shall consist of a Chief Justice and such other Judges as the President may from time to time deem it necessary to appoint.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Constitution of High Courts' under Article 216.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 216

उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन

Input:
आधार (Premise): Every High Court shall consist of a Chief Justice and such other Judges as the President may from time to time deem it necessary to appoint.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 216 के तहत 'उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 216

Constitution of High Courts

Input:
Premise: Every High Court shall consist of a Chief Justice and such other Judges as the President may from time to time deem it necessary to appoint.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Constitution of High Courts'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 216

उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन

Input:
आधार (Premise): Every High Court shall consist of a Chief Justice and such other Judges as the President may from time to time deem it necessary to appoint.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 216

Constitution of High Courts

Input:
Premise: Every High Court shall consist of a Chief Justice and such other Judges as the President may from time to time deem it necessary to appoint.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 216

उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन

Input:
आधार (Premise): Every High Court shall consist of a Chief Justice and such other Judges as the President may from time to time deem it necessary to appoint.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 216

Constitution of High Courts

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 216: Constitution of High Courts
Text: Every High Court shall consist of a Chief Justice and such other Judges as the President may from time to time deem it necessary to appoint.

Output: Judiciary

Explanation: Article 216 deals with 'Constitution of High Courts' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Judiciary'.


Article 216

उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 216: उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन
पाठ: Every High Court shall consist of a Chief Justice and such other Judges as the President may from time to time deem it necessary to appoint.

Output: न्यायपालिका

Explanation: Article 216 'उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'न्यायपालिका' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।