Article 181

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) At any sitting of the Legislative Assembly, while any resolution for the removal of the Speaker from his office is under consideration, the Speaker, or while any resolution for the removal of the Deputy Speaker, from his office is under consideration, the Deputy Speaker, shall not, though he is present, preside, and the provisions of clause (2) of article 180 shall apply in relation to every such sitting as they apply in relation to a sitting from which the Speaker or, as the case may be, the Deputy Speaker, is absent.
(2) The Speaker shall have the right to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of, the Legislative Assembly while any resolution for his removal from office is under consideration in the Assembly and shall, notwithstanding anything in article 189, be entitled to vote only in the first instance on such resolution or on any other matter during such proceedings but not in the case of an equality of votes.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'जब पद से हटाने का प्रस्ताव विचाराधीन हो तो अध्यक्ष या उपाध्यक्ष को अध्यक्षता नहीं करनी चाहिए' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 181

The Speaker or the Deputy Speaker Not to Preside While a Resolution for His Removal from Office Is Under Consideration

Input:
Premise: (1) At any sitting of the Legislative Assembly, while any resolution for the removal of the Speaker from his office is under consideration, the Speaker, or while any resolution for the removal of the Deputy Speaker, from his office is under consideration, the Deputy Speaker, shall not, though he is present, preside, and the provisions of clause (2) of article 180 shall apply in relation to every such sitting as they apply in relation to a sitting from which the Speaker or, as the case may be, the Deputy Speaker, is absent.
(2) The Speaker shall have the right to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of, the Legislative Assembly while any resolution for his removal from office is under consideration in the Assembly and shall, notwithstanding anything in article 189, be entitled to vote only in the first instance on such resolution or on any other matter during such proceedings but not in the case of an equality of votes.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 181

जब पद से हटाने का प्रस्ताव विचाराधीन हो तो अध्यक्ष या उपाध्यक्ष को अध्यक्षता नहीं करनी चाहिए

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) At any sitting of the Legislative Assembly, while any resolution for the removal of the Speaker from his office is under consideration, the Speaker, or while any resolution for the removal of the Deputy Speaker, from his office is under consideration, the Deputy Speaker, shall not, though he is present, preside, and the provisions of clause (2) of article 180 shall apply in relation to every such sitting as they apply in relation to a sitting from which the Speaker or, as the case may be, the Deputy Speaker, is absent.
(2) The Speaker shall have the right to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of, the Legislative Assembly while any resolution for his removal from office is under consideration in the Assembly and shall, notwithstanding anything in article 189, be entitled to vote only in the first instance on such resolution or on any other matter during such proceedings but not in the case of an equality of votes.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 181

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 181: The Speaker or the Deputy Speaker Not to Preside While a Resolution for His Removal from Office Is Under Consideration
Text: (1) At any sitting of the Legislative Assembly, while any resolution for the removal of the Speaker from his office is under consideration, the Speake...

Output: Federal Structure

Explanation: Article 181 deals with 'The Speaker or the Deputy Speaker Not to Preside While a Resolution for His Removal from Office Is Under Consideration' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Federal Structure'.


Article 181

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 181: जब पद से हटाने का प्रस्ताव विचाराधीन हो तो अध्यक्ष या उपाध्यक्ष को अध्यक्षता नहीं करनी चाहिए
पाठ: (1) At any sitting of the Legislative Assembly, while any resolution for the removal of the Speaker from his office is under consideration, the Speake...

Output: संवैधानिक संघ ढांचा

Explanation: Article 181 'जब पद से हटाने का प्रस्ताव विचाराधीन हो तो अध्यक्ष या उपाध्यक्ष को अध्यक्षता नहीं करनी चाहिए' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'संवैधानिक संघ ढांचा' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 182

Input: What does Article 182 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 182 governs 'The Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Legislative Council'. The constitutional text states: The Legislative Council of every State having such Council shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the Council to be respectively Chairman and Deputy Chairman thereof and, so often as the office of Chairman or Deputy Chairman becomes vacant, the Council shall choose another member to be Chairman or Deputy Chairman, as the case may be.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 182 is titled 'The Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Legislative Council' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 182

विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 182 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 182 'विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: The Legislative Council of every State having such Council shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the Council to be respectively Chairman and Deputy Chairman thereof and, so often as the office of Chairman or Deputy Chairman becomes vacant, the Council shall choose another member to be Chairman or Deputy Chairman, as the case may be.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 182 का शीर्षक 'विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 182

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'The Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Legislative Council'?

Output: Article 182

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'The Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Legislative Council' under the provisions of Article 182.


Article 182

विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 182

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 182 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति' स्थापित करता है।


Article 182

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'The Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Legislative Council'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 182.

Explanation: Article 182 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'The Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Legislative Council' under the Constitution of India.


Article 182

विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 182 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 182 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 182

Input: Summarize Article 182 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 182 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'The Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Legislative Council'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 182

विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 182 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 182 'विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 182

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 182 (The Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Legislative Council).

Output: Article Article 182 establishes the fundamental framework for 'The Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Legislative Council' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: The Legislative Council of every State having such Council shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the Council to be respectively Chairman and.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 182

विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 182 ('विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 182 भारत के संविधान में 'विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: The Legislative Council of every State having such Council shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the Council to be respectively Chairman and...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 182

Input:
Premise: The Legislative Council of every State having such Council shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the Council to be respectively Chairman and Deputy Chairman thereof and, so often as the office of Chairman or Deputy Chairman becomes vacant, the Council shall choose another member to be Chairman or Deputy Chairman, as the case may be.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'The Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Legislative Council' under Article 182.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 182

विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति

Input:
आधार (Premise): The Legislative Council of every State having such Council shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the Council to be respectively Chairman and Deputy Chairman thereof and, so often as the office of Chairman or Deputy Chairman becomes vacant, the Council shall choose another member to be Chairman or Deputy Chairman, as the case may be.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 182 के तहत 'विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 182

Input:
Premise: The Legislative Council of every State having such Council shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the Council to be respectively Chairman and Deputy Chairman thereof and, so often as the office of Chairman or Deputy Chairman becomes vacant, the Council shall choose another member to be Chairman or Deputy Chairman, as the case may be.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'The Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Legislative Council'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 182

विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति

Input:
आधार (Premise): The Legislative Council of every State having such Council shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the Council to be respectively Chairman and Deputy Chairman thereof and, so often as the office of Chairman or Deputy Chairman becomes vacant, the Council shall choose another member to be Chairman or Deputy Chairman, as the case may be.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 182

Input:
Premise: The Legislative Council of every State having such Council shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the Council to be respectively Chairman and Deputy Chairman thereof and, so often as the office of Chairman or Deputy Chairman becomes vacant, the Council shall choose another member to be Chairman or Deputy Chairman, as the case may be.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 182

विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति

Input:
आधार (Premise): The Legislative Council of every State having such Council shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the Council to be respectively Chairman and Deputy Chairman thereof and, so often as the office of Chairman or Deputy Chairman becomes vacant, the Council shall choose another member to be Chairman or Deputy Chairman, as the case may be.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 182

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 182: The Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Legislative Council
Text: The Legislative Council of every State having such Council shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the Council to be respectively Chairman and...

Output: Federal Structure

Explanation: Article 182 deals with 'The Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Legislative Council' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Federal Structure'.


Article 182

विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 182: विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति
पाठ: The Legislative Council of every State having such Council shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the Council to be respectively Chairman and...

Output: संवैधानिक संघ ढांचा

Explanation: Article 182 'विधान परिषद के सभापति एवं उपसभापति' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'संवैधानिक संघ ढांचा' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 220

Input: What does Article 220 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 220 governs 'Restriction on Practice After Being a Permanent Judge'. The constitutional text states: No person who, after the commencement of this Constitution, has held office as a permanent Judge of a High Court shall plead or act in any court or before any authority in India except the Supreme Court and the other High Courts.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 220 is titled 'Restriction on Practice After Being a Permanent Judge' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 220

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 220 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 220 'स्थायी जज बनने के बाद प्रैक्टिस पर प्रतिबंध' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: No person who, after the commencement of this Constitution, has held office as a permanent Judge of a High Court shall plead or act in any court or before any authority in India except the Supreme Court and the other High Courts.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 220 का शीर्षक 'स्थायी जज बनने के बाद प्रैक्टिस पर प्रतिबंध' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 220

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Restriction on Practice After Being a Permanent Judge'?

Output: Article 220

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Restriction on Practice After Being a Permanent Judge' under the provisions of Article 220.


Article 220

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'स्थायी जज बनने के बाद प्रैक्टिस पर प्रतिबंध' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 220

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 220 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'स्थायी जज बनने के बाद प्रैक्टिस पर प्रतिबंध' स्थापित करता है।


Article 220

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Restriction on Practice After Being a Permanent Judge'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 220.

Explanation: Article 220 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Restriction on Practice After Being a Permanent Judge' under the Constitution of India.


Article 220

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'स्थायी जज बनने के बाद प्रैक्टिस पर प्रतिबंध' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 220 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 220 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'स्थायी जज बनने के बाद प्रैक्टिस पर प्रतिबंध' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 220

Input: Summarize Article 220 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 220 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Restriction on Practice After Being a Permanent Judge'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 220

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 220 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 220 'स्थायी जज बनने के बाद प्रैक्टिस पर प्रतिबंध' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 220

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 220 (Restriction on Practice After Being a Permanent Judge).

Output: Article Article 220 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Restriction on Practice After Being a Permanent Judge' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: No person who, after the commencement of this Constitution, has held office as a permanent Judge of a High Court shall plead or act in any court or be.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 220

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 220 ('स्थायी जज बनने के बाद प्रैक्टिस पर प्रतिबंध') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 220 भारत के संविधान में 'स्थायी जज बनने के बाद प्रैक्टिस पर प्रतिबंध' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: No person who, after the commencement of this Constitution, has held office as a permanent Judge of a High Court shall plead or act in any court or be...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 220

Input:
Premise: No person who, after the commencement of this Constitution, has held office as a permanent Judge of a High Court shall plead or act in any court or before any authority in India except the Supreme Court and the other High Courts.
Explanation — In this article, the expression “High Court” does not include a High Court for a State specified in Part B of the First Schedule as it existed before the commencement of the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Restriction on Practice After Being a Permanent Judge' under Article 220.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 220

Input:
आधार (Premise): No person who, after the commencement of this Constitution, has held office as a permanent Judge of a High Court shall plead or act in any court or before any authority in India except the Supreme Court and the other High Courts.
Explanation — In this article, the expression “High Court” does not include a High Court for a State specified in Part B of the First Schedule as it existed before the commencement of the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 220 के तहत 'स्थायी जज बनने के बाद प्रैक्टिस पर प्रतिबंध' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 220

Input:
Premise: No person who, after the commencement of this Constitution, has held office as a permanent Judge of a High Court shall plead or act in any court or before any authority in India except the Supreme Court and the other High Courts.
Explanation — In this article, the expression “High Court” does not include a High Court for a State specified in Part B of the First Schedule as it existed before the commencement of the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Restriction on Practice After Being a Permanent Judge'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 220

Input:
आधार (Premise): No person who, after the commencement of this Constitution, has held office as a permanent Judge of a High Court shall plead or act in any court or before any authority in India except the Supreme Court and the other High Courts.
Explanation — In this article, the expression “High Court” does not include a High Court for a State specified in Part B of the First Schedule as it existed before the commencement of the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'स्थायी जज बनने के बाद प्रैक्टिस पर प्रतिबंध' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 220

Input:
Premise: No person who, after the commencement of this Constitution, has held office as a permanent Judge of a High Court shall plead or act in any court or before any authority in India except the Supreme Court and the other High Courts.
Explanation — In this article, the expression “High Court” does not include a High Court for a State specified in Part B of the First Schedule as it existed before the commencement of the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 220

Input:
आधार (Premise): No person who, after the commencement of this Constitution, has held office as a permanent Judge of a High Court shall plead or act in any court or before any authority in India except the Supreme Court and the other High Courts.
Explanation — In this article, the expression “High Court” does not include a High Court for a State specified in Part B of the First Schedule as it existed before the commencement of the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 220

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 220: Restriction on Practice After Being a Permanent Judge
Text: No person who, after the commencement of this Constitution, has held office as a permanent Judge of a High Court shall plead or act in any court or be...

Output: Judiciary

Explanation: Article 220 deals with 'Restriction on Practice After Being a Permanent Judge' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Judiciary'.


Article 220

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 220: स्थायी जज बनने के बाद प्रैक्टिस पर प्रतिबंध
पाठ: No person who, after the commencement of this Constitution, has held office as a permanent Judge of a High Court shall plead or act in any court or be...

Output: न्यायपालिका

Explanation: Article 220 'स्थायी जज बनने के बाद प्रैक्टिस पर प्रतिबंध' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'न्यायपालिका' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 223

Appointment of Acting Chief Justice

Input: What does Article 223 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 223 governs 'Appointment of Acting Chief Justice'. The constitutional text states: When the office of Chief Justice of a High Court is vacant or when any such Chief Justice is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the duties of his office, the duties of the office shall be performed by such one of the other Judges of the Court as the President may appoint for the purpose.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 223 is titled 'Appointment of Acting Chief Justice' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 223

कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 223 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 223 'कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: When the office of Chief Justice of a High Court is vacant or when any such Chief Justice is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the duties of his office, the duties of the office shall be performed by such one of the other Judges of the Court as the President may appoint for the purpose.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 223 का शीर्षक 'कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 223

Appointment of Acting Chief Justice

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Appointment of Acting Chief Justice'?

Output: Article 223

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Appointment of Acting Chief Justice' under the provisions of Article 223.


Article 223

कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 223

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 223 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति' स्थापित करता है।


Article 223

Appointment of Acting Chief Justice

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Appointment of Acting Chief Justice'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 223.

Explanation: Article 223 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Appointment of Acting Chief Justice' under the Constitution of India.


Article 223

कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 223 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 223 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 223

Appointment of Acting Chief Justice

Input: Summarize Article 223 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 223 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Appointment of Acting Chief Justice'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 223

कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 223 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 223 'कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 223

Appointment of Acting Chief Justice

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 223 (Appointment of Acting Chief Justice).

Output: Article Article 223 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Appointment of Acting Chief Justice' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: When the office of Chief Justice of a High Court is vacant or when any such Chief Justice is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 223

कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 223 ('कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 223 भारत के संविधान में 'कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: When the office of Chief Justice of a High Court is vacant or when any such Chief Justice is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 223

Appointment of Acting Chief Justice

Input:
Premise: When the office of Chief Justice of a High Court is vacant or when any such Chief Justice is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the duties of his office, the duties of the office shall be performed by such one of the other Judges of the Court as the President may appoint for the purpose.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Appointment of Acting Chief Justice' under Article 223.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 223

कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): When the office of Chief Justice of a High Court is vacant or when any such Chief Justice is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the duties of his office, the duties of the office shall be performed by such one of the other Judges of the Court as the President may appoint for the purpose.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 223 के तहत 'कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 223

Appointment of Acting Chief Justice

Input:
Premise: When the office of Chief Justice of a High Court is vacant or when any such Chief Justice is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the duties of his office, the duties of the office shall be performed by such one of the other Judges of the Court as the President may appoint for the purpose.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Appointment of Acting Chief Justice'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 223

कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): When the office of Chief Justice of a High Court is vacant or when any such Chief Justice is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the duties of his office, the duties of the office shall be performed by such one of the other Judges of the Court as the President may appoint for the purpose.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 223

Appointment of Acting Chief Justice

Input:
Premise: When the office of Chief Justice of a High Court is vacant or when any such Chief Justice is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the duties of his office, the duties of the office shall be performed by such one of the other Judges of the Court as the President may appoint for the purpose.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 223

कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति

Input:
आधार (Premise): When the office of Chief Justice of a High Court is vacant or when any such Chief Justice is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the duties of his office, the duties of the office shall be performed by such one of the other Judges of the Court as the President may appoint for the purpose.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 223

Appointment of Acting Chief Justice

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 223: Appointment of Acting Chief Justice
Text: When the office of Chief Justice of a High Court is vacant or when any such Chief Justice is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the...

Output: Judiciary

Explanation: Article 223 deals with 'Appointment of Acting Chief Justice' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Judiciary'.


Article 223

कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 223: कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति
पाठ: When the office of Chief Justice of a High Court is vacant or when any such Chief Justice is, by reason of absence or otherwise, unable to perform the...

Output: न्यायपालिका

Explanation: Article 223 'कार्यवाहक मुख्य न्यायाधीश की नियुक्ति' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'न्यायपालिका' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 243O

Input: What does Article 243O of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output:
Article 243O governs 'Bar to Interference by Courts in Electoral Matters'. The constitutional text states: Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, —
(a) the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats to such constituencies, made or purporting to be made under article 243K, shall not be called in question in any court;
(b) no election to any Panchayat shall be called in question except by an election petition presented to such authority and in such manner as is provided for by or under any law made by the Legislature of a State.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 243O is titled 'Bar to Interference by Courts in Electoral Matters' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 243O

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 243O क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output:
Article 243O 'चुनावी मामलों में न्यायालयों द्वारा हस्तक्षेप पर रोक' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, —
(a) the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats to such constituencies, made or purporting to be made under article 243K, shall not be called in question in any court;
(b) no election to any Panchayat shall be called in question except by an election petition presented to such authority and in such manner as is provided for by or under any law made by the Legislature of a State.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 243O का शीर्षक 'चुनावी मामलों में न्यायालयों द्वारा हस्तक्षेप पर रोक' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 243O

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Bar to Interference by Courts in Electoral Matters'?

Output: Article 243O

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Bar to Interference by Courts in Electoral Matters' under the provisions of Article 243O.


Article 243O

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'चुनावी मामलों में न्यायालयों द्वारा हस्तक्षेप पर रोक' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 243O

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 243O के प्रावधानों के तहत 'चुनावी मामलों में न्यायालयों द्वारा हस्तक्षेप पर रोक' स्थापित करता है।


Article 243O

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Bar to Interference by Courts in Electoral Matters'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 243O.

Explanation: Article 243O specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Bar to Interference by Courts in Electoral Matters' under the Constitution of India.


Article 243O

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'चुनावी मामलों में न्यायालयों द्वारा हस्तक्षेप पर रोक' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 243O की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 243O विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'चुनावी मामलों में न्यायालयों द्वारा हस्तक्षेप पर रोक' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 243O

Input: Summarize Article 243O of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 243O defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Bar to Interference by Courts in Electoral Matters'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 243O

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 243O का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 243O 'चुनावी मामलों में न्यायालयों द्वारा हस्तक्षेप पर रोक' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 243O

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 243O (Bar to Interference by Courts in Electoral Matters).

Output:
Article Article 243O establishes the fundamental framework for 'Bar to Interference by Courts in Electoral Matters' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, —
(a) the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats .... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 243O

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 243O ('चुनावी मामलों में न्यायालयों द्वारा हस्तक्षेप पर रोक') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 243O भारत के संविधान में 'चुनावी मामलों में न्यायालयों द्वारा हस्तक्षेप पर रोक' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, —
(a) the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats ...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 243O

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, —
(a) the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats to such constituencies, made or purporting to be made under article 243K, shall not be called in question in any court;
(b) no election to any Panchayat shall be called in question except by an election petition presented to such authority and in such manner as is provided for by or under any law made by the Legislature of a State.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Bar to Interference by Courts in Electoral Matters' under Article 243O.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 243O

Input:
आधार (Premise): Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, —
(a) the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats to such constituencies, made or purporting to be made under article 243K, shall not be called in question in any court;
(b) no election to any Panchayat shall be called in question except by an election petition presented to such authority and in such manner as is provided for by or under any law made by the Legislature of a State.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 243O के तहत 'चुनावी मामलों में न्यायालयों द्वारा हस्तक्षेप पर रोक' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 243O

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, —
(a) the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats to such constituencies, made or purporting to be made under article 243K, shall not be called in question in any court;
(b) no election to any Panchayat shall be called in question except by an election petition presented to such authority and in such manner as is provided for by or under any law made by the Legislature of a State.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Bar to Interference by Courts in Electoral Matters'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 243O

Input:
आधार (Premise): Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, —
(a) the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats to such constituencies, made or purporting to be made under article 243K, shall not be called in question in any court;
(b) no election to any Panchayat shall be called in question except by an election petition presented to such authority and in such manner as is provided for by or under any law made by the Legislature of a State.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'चुनावी मामलों में न्यायालयों द्वारा हस्तक्षेप पर रोक' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 243O

Input:
Premise: Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, —
(a) the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats to such constituencies, made or purporting to be made under article 243K, shall not be called in question in any court;
(b) no election to any Panchayat shall be called in question except by an election petition presented to such authority and in such manner as is provided for by or under any law made by the Legislature of a State.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 243O

Input:
आधार (Premise): Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, —
(a) the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats to such constituencies, made or purporting to be made under article 243K, shall not be called in question in any court;
(b) no election to any Panchayat shall be called in question except by an election petition presented to such authority and in such manner as is provided for by or under any law made by the Legislature of a State.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 243O

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 243O: Bar to Interference by Courts in Electoral Matters
Text: Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, —
(a) the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats ...

Output: Federal Structure

Explanation: Article 243O deals with 'Bar to Interference by Courts in Electoral Matters' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Federal Structure'.


Article 243O

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 243O: चुनावी मामलों में न्यायालयों द्वारा हस्तक्षेप पर रोक
पाठ: Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, —
(a) the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats ...

Output: संवैधानिक संघ ढांचा

Explanation: Article 243O 'चुनावी मामलों में न्यायालयों द्वारा हस्तक्षेप पर रोक' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'संवैधानिक संघ ढांचा' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 243W

Input: What does Article 243W of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output:
Article 243W governs 'Powers, Authority and Responsibilities of Municipalities, Etc'. The constitutional text states: Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Legislature of a State may, by law, endow —
(a) the Municipalities with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as institutions of self-government and such law may contain provisions for the devolution of powers and responsibilities upon Municipalities, subject to such conditions as may be specified therein, with respect to —
(i) the preparation of plans for economic development and social justice;
(ii) the performance of functions and the implementation of schemes as may be entrusted to them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule;
(b) the Committees with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to carry out the responsibilities conferred upon them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 243W is titled 'Powers, Authority and Responsibilities of Municipalities, Etc' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 243W

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 243W क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output:
Article 243W 'नगर पालिकाओं आदि की शक्तियां, प्राधिकार और उत्तरदायित्व' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Legislature of a State may, by law, endow —
(a) the Municipalities with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as institutions of self-government and such law may contain provisions for the devolution of powers and responsibilities upon Municipalities, subject to such conditions as may be specified therein, with respect to —
(i) the preparation of plans for economic development and social justice;
(ii) the performance of functions and the implementation of schemes as may be entrusted to them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule;
(b) the Committees with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to carry out the responsibilities conferred upon them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 243W का शीर्षक 'नगर पालिकाओं आदि की शक्तियां, प्राधिकार और उत्तरदायित्व' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 243W

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Powers, Authority and Responsibilities of Municipalities, Etc'?

Output: Article 243W

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Powers, Authority and Responsibilities of Municipalities, Etc' under the provisions of Article 243W.


Article 243W

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'नगर पालिकाओं आदि की शक्तियां, प्राधिकार और उत्तरदायित्व' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 243W

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 243W के प्रावधानों के तहत 'नगर पालिकाओं आदि की शक्तियां, प्राधिकार और उत्तरदायित्व' स्थापित करता है।


Article 243W

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Powers, Authority and Responsibilities of Municipalities, Etc'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 243W.

Explanation: Article 243W specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Powers, Authority and Responsibilities of Municipalities, Etc' under the Constitution of India.


Article 243W

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'नगर पालिकाओं आदि की शक्तियां, प्राधिकार और उत्तरदायित्व' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 243W की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 243W विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'नगर पालिकाओं आदि की शक्तियां, प्राधिकार और उत्तरदायित्व' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 243W

Input: Summarize Article 243W of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 243W defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Powers, Authority and Responsibilities of Municipalities, Etc'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 243W

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 243W का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 243W 'नगर पालिकाओं आदि की शक्तियां, प्राधिकार और उत्तरदायित्व' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 243W

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 243W (Powers, Authority and Responsibilities of Municipalities, Etc).

Output:
Article Article 243W establishes the fundamental framework for 'Powers, Authority and Responsibilities of Municipalities, Etc' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Legislature of a State may, by law, endow —
(a) the Municipalities with such powers and authority .... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 243W

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 243W ('नगर पालिकाओं आदि की शक्तियां, प्राधिकार और उत्तरदायित्व') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 243W भारत के संविधान में 'नगर पालिकाओं आदि की शक्तियां, प्राधिकार और उत्तरदायित्व' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Legislature of a State may, by law, endow —
(a) the Municipalities with such powers and authority ...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 243W

Input:
Premise: Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Legislature of a State may, by law, endow —
(a) the Municipalities with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as institutions of self-government and such law may contain provisions for the devolution of powers and responsibilities upon Municipalities, subject to such conditions as may be specified therein, with respect to —
(i) the preparation of plans for economic development and social justice;
(ii) the performance of functions and the implementation of schemes as may be entrusted to them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule;
(b) the Committees with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to carry out the responsibilities conferred upon them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Powers, Authority and Responsibilities of Municipalities, Etc' under Article 243W.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 243W

Input:
आधार (Premise): Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Legislature of a State may, by law, endow —
(a) the Municipalities with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as institutions of self-government and such law may contain provisions for the devolution of powers and responsibilities upon Municipalities, subject to such conditions as may be specified therein, with respect to —
(i) the preparation of plans for economic development and social justice;
(ii) the performance of functions and the implementation of schemes as may be entrusted to them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule;
(b) the Committees with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to carry out the responsibilities conferred upon them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 243W के तहत 'नगर पालिकाओं आदि की शक्तियां, प्राधिकार और उत्तरदायित्व' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 243W

Input:
Premise: Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Legislature of a State may, by law, endow —
(a) the Municipalities with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as institutions of self-government and such law may contain provisions for the devolution of powers and responsibilities upon Municipalities, subject to such conditions as may be specified therein, with respect to —
(i) the preparation of plans for economic development and social justice;
(ii) the performance of functions and the implementation of schemes as may be entrusted to them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule;
(b) the Committees with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to carry out the responsibilities conferred upon them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Powers, Authority and Responsibilities of Municipalities, Etc'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 243W

Input:
आधार (Premise): Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Legislature of a State may, by law, endow —
(a) the Municipalities with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as institutions of self-government and such law may contain provisions for the devolution of powers and responsibilities upon Municipalities, subject to such conditions as may be specified therein, with respect to —
(i) the preparation of plans for economic development and social justice;
(ii) the performance of functions and the implementation of schemes as may be entrusted to them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule;
(b) the Committees with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to carry out the responsibilities conferred upon them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'नगर पालिकाओं आदि की शक्तियां, प्राधिकार और उत्तरदायित्व' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 243W

Input:
Premise: Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Legislature of a State may, by law, endow —
(a) the Municipalities with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as institutions of self-government and such law may contain provisions for the devolution of powers and responsibilities upon Municipalities, subject to such conditions as may be specified therein, with respect to —
(i) the preparation of plans for economic development and social justice;
(ii) the performance of functions and the implementation of schemes as may be entrusted to them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule;
(b) the Committees with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to carry out the responsibilities conferred upon them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 243W

Input:
आधार (Premise): Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Legislature of a State may, by law, endow —
(a) the Municipalities with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as institutions of self-government and such law may contain provisions for the devolution of powers and responsibilities upon Municipalities, subject to such conditions as may be specified therein, with respect to —
(i) the preparation of plans for economic development and social justice;
(ii) the performance of functions and the implementation of schemes as may be entrusted to them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule;
(b) the Committees with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to carry out the responsibilities conferred upon them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 243W

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 243W: Powers, Authority and Responsibilities of Municipalities, Etc
Text: Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Legislature of a State may, by law, endow —
(a) the Municipalities with such powers and authority ...

Output: Federal Structure

Explanation: Article 243W deals with 'Powers, Authority and Responsibilities of Municipalities, Etc' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Federal Structure'.


Article 243W

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 243W: नगर पालिकाओं आदि की शक्तियां, प्राधिकार और उत्तरदायित्व
पाठ: Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Legislature of a State may, by law, endow —
(a) the Municipalities with such powers and authority ...

Output: संवैधानिक संघ ढांचा

Explanation: Article 243W 'नगर पालिकाओं आदि की शक्तियां, प्राधिकार और उत्तरदायित्व' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'संवैधानिक संघ ढांचा' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 243ZJ

Input: What does Article 243ZJ of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output:
Article 243ZJ governs 'Number and Term of Members of Board and Its Office Bearers'. The constitutional text states: (1) The board shall consist of such number of directors as may be provided by the Legislature of a State, by law:
Provided that the maximum number of directors of a co-operative society shall not exceed twenty-one:
Provided further that the Legislature of a State shall, by law, provide for the reservation of one seat for the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes and two seats for women on board of every co-operative society consisting of individuals as members and having members from such class of category of persons.

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 243ZJ is titled 'Number and Term of Members of Board and Its Office Bearers' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 243ZJ

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 243ZJ क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output:
Article 243ZJ 'बोर्ड के सदस्यों और उसके पदाधिकारियों की संख्या और कार्यकाल' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: (1) The board shall consist of such number of directors as may be provided by the Legislature of a State, by law:
Provided that the maximum number of directors of a co-operative society shall not exceed twenty-one:
Provided further that the Legislature of a State shall, by law, provide for the reservation of one seat for the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes and two seats for women on board of every co-operative society consisting of individuals as members and having members from such class of category of persons.

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 243ZJ का शीर्षक 'बोर्ड के सदस्यों और उसके पदाधिकारियों की संख्या और कार्यकाल' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 243ZJ

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Number and Term of Members of Board and Its Office Bearers'?

Output: Article 243ZJ

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Number and Term of Members of Board and Its Office Bearers' under the provisions of Article 243ZJ.


Article 243ZJ

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'बोर्ड के सदस्यों और उसके पदाधिकारियों की संख्या और कार्यकाल' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 243ZJ

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 243ZJ के प्रावधानों के तहत 'बोर्ड के सदस्यों और उसके पदाधिकारियों की संख्या और कार्यकाल' स्थापित करता है।


Article 243ZJ

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Number and Term of Members of Board and Its Office Bearers'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 243ZJ.

Explanation: Article 243ZJ specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Number and Term of Members of Board and Its Office Bearers' under the Constitution of India.


Article 243ZJ

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'बोर्ड के सदस्यों और उसके पदाधिकारियों की संख्या और कार्यकाल' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 243ZJ की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 243ZJ विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'बोर्ड के सदस्यों और उसके पदाधिकारियों की संख्या और कार्यकाल' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 243ZJ

Input: Summarize Article 243ZJ of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 243ZJ defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Number and Term of Members of Board and Its Office Bearers'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 243ZJ

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 243ZJ का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 243ZJ 'बोर्ड के सदस्यों और उसके पदाधिकारियों की संख्या और कार्यकाल' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 243ZJ

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 243ZJ (Number and Term of Members of Board and Its Office Bearers).

Output:
Article Article 243ZJ establishes the fundamental framework for 'Number and Term of Members of Board and Its Office Bearers' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) The board shall consist of such number of directors as may be provided by the Legislature of a State, by law:
Provided that the maximum number of .... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 243ZJ

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 243ZJ ('बोर्ड के सदस्यों और उसके पदाधिकारियों की संख्या और कार्यकाल') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output:
अनुच्छेद Article 243ZJ भारत के संविधान में 'बोर्ड के सदस्यों और उसके पदाधिकारियों की संख्या और कार्यकाल' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) The board shall consist of such number of directors as may be provided by the Legislature of a State, by law:
Provided that the maximum number of ...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 243ZJ

Input:
Premise: (1) The board shall consist of such number of directors as may be provided by the Legislature of a State, by law:
Provided that the maximum number of directors of a co-operative society shall not exceed twenty-one:
Provided further that the Legislature of a State shall, by law, provide for the reservation of one seat for the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes and two seats for women on board of every co-operative society consisting of individuals as members and having members from such class of category of persons.
(2) The term of office of elected members of the board and its office bearers shall be five years from the date of election and the term of office bearers shall be coterminous with the term of the board:Provided that the board may fill a casual vacancy on the board by nomination out of the same class of members in respect of which the casual vacancy has arisen, if the term of office of the board is less than half of its original term.
(3) The Legislature of a State shall, by law, make provisions for co-option of persons to be members of the board having experience in the field of banking, management, finance or specialisation in any other field relating to the objects and activities undertaken by the co-operative society, as members of the board of such society:
Provided that the number of such co-opted members shall not exceed two in addition to twenty-one directors specified in the first proviso to clause (1):
Provided further that such co-opted members shall not have the right to vote in any election of the cooperative society in their capacity as such member or to be eligible to be elected as office bearers of the board:
Provided also that the functional directors of a co-operative society shall also be the members of the board and such members shall be excluded for the purpose of counting the total number of directors specified in the first proviso to clause (1).

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Number and Term of Members of Board and Its Office Bearers' under Article 243ZJ.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 243ZJ

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The board shall consist of such number of directors as may be provided by the Legislature of a State, by law:
Provided that the maximum number of directors of a co-operative society shall not exceed twenty-one:
Provided further that the Legislature of a State shall, by law, provide for the reservation of one seat for the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes and two seats for women on board of every co-operative society consisting of individuals as members and having members from such class of category of persons.
(2) The term of office of elected members of the board and its office bearers shall be five years from the date of election and the term of office bearers shall be coterminous with the term of the board:Provided that the board may fill a casual vacancy on the board by nomination out of the same class of members in respect of which the casual vacancy has arisen, if the term of office of the board is less than half of its original term.
(3) The Legislature of a State shall, by law, make provisions for co-option of persons to be members of the board having experience in the field of banking, management, finance or specialisation in any other field relating to the objects and activities undertaken by the co-operative society, as members of the board of such society:
Provided that the number of such co-opted members shall not exceed two in addition to twenty-one directors specified in the first proviso to clause (1):
Provided further that such co-opted members shall not have the right to vote in any election of the cooperative society in their capacity as such member or to be eligible to be elected as office bearers of the board:
Provided also that the functional directors of a co-operative society shall also be the members of the board and such members shall be excluded for the purpose of counting the total number of directors specified in the first proviso to clause (1).

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 243ZJ के तहत 'बोर्ड के सदस्यों और उसके पदाधिकारियों की संख्या और कार्यकाल' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 243ZJ

Input:
Premise: (1) The board shall consist of such number of directors as may be provided by the Legislature of a State, by law:
Provided that the maximum number of directors of a co-operative society shall not exceed twenty-one:
Provided further that the Legislature of a State shall, by law, provide for the reservation of one seat for the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes and two seats for women on board of every co-operative society consisting of individuals as members and having members from such class of category of persons.
(2) The term of office of elected members of the board and its office bearers shall be five years from the date of election and the term of office bearers shall be coterminous with the term of the board:Provided that the board may fill a casual vacancy on the board by nomination out of the same class of members in respect of which the casual vacancy has arisen, if the term of office of the board is less than half of its original term.
(3) The Legislature of a State shall, by law, make provisions for co-option of persons to be members of the board having experience in the field of banking, management, finance or specialisation in any other field relating to the objects and activities undertaken by the co-operative society, as members of the board of such society:
Provided that the number of such co-opted members shall not exceed two in addition to twenty-one directors specified in the first proviso to clause (1):
Provided further that such co-opted members shall not have the right to vote in any election of the cooperative society in their capacity as such member or to be eligible to be elected as office bearers of the board:
Provided also that the functional directors of a co-operative society shall also be the members of the board and such members shall be excluded for the purpose of counting the total number of directors specified in the first proviso to clause (1).

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Number and Term of Members of Board and Its Office Bearers'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 243ZJ

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The board shall consist of such number of directors as may be provided by the Legislature of a State, by law:
Provided that the maximum number of directors of a co-operative society shall not exceed twenty-one:
Provided further that the Legislature of a State shall, by law, provide for the reservation of one seat for the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes and two seats for women on board of every co-operative society consisting of individuals as members and having members from such class of category of persons.
(2) The term of office of elected members of the board and its office bearers shall be five years from the date of election and the term of office bearers shall be coterminous with the term of the board:Provided that the board may fill a casual vacancy on the board by nomination out of the same class of members in respect of which the casual vacancy has arisen, if the term of office of the board is less than half of its original term.
(3) The Legislature of a State shall, by law, make provisions for co-option of persons to be members of the board having experience in the field of banking, management, finance or specialisation in any other field relating to the objects and activities undertaken by the co-operative society, as members of the board of such society:
Provided that the number of such co-opted members shall not exceed two in addition to twenty-one directors specified in the first proviso to clause (1):
Provided further that such co-opted members shall not have the right to vote in any election of the cooperative society in their capacity as such member or to be eligible to be elected as office bearers of the board:
Provided also that the functional directors of a co-operative society shall also be the members of the board and such members shall be excluded for the purpose of counting the total number of directors specified in the first proviso to clause (1).

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'बोर्ड के सदस्यों और उसके पदाधिकारियों की संख्या और कार्यकाल' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 243ZJ

Input:
Premise: (1) The board shall consist of such number of directors as may be provided by the Legislature of a State, by law:
Provided that the maximum number of directors of a co-operative society shall not exceed twenty-one:
Provided further that the Legislature of a State shall, by law, provide for the reservation of one seat for the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes and two seats for women on board of every co-operative society consisting of individuals as members and having members from such class of category of persons.
(2) The term of office of elected members of the board and its office bearers shall be five years from the date of election and the term of office bearers shall be coterminous with the term of the board:Provided that the board may fill a casual vacancy on the board by nomination out of the same class of members in respect of which the casual vacancy has arisen, if the term of office of the board is less than half of its original term.
(3) The Legislature of a State shall, by law, make provisions for co-option of persons to be members of the board having experience in the field of banking, management, finance or specialisation in any other field relating to the objects and activities undertaken by the co-operative society, as members of the board of such society:
Provided that the number of such co-opted members shall not exceed two in addition to twenty-one directors specified in the first proviso to clause (1):
Provided further that such co-opted members shall not have the right to vote in any election of the cooperative society in their capacity as such member or to be eligible to be elected as office bearers of the board:
Provided also that the functional directors of a co-operative society shall also be the members of the board and such members shall be excluded for the purpose of counting the total number of directors specified in the first proviso to clause (1).

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 243ZJ

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) The board shall consist of such number of directors as may be provided by the Legislature of a State, by law:
Provided that the maximum number of directors of a co-operative society shall not exceed twenty-one:
Provided further that the Legislature of a State shall, by law, provide for the reservation of one seat for the Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes and two seats for women on board of every co-operative society consisting of individuals as members and having members from such class of category of persons.
(2) The term of office of elected members of the board and its office bearers shall be five years from the date of election and the term of office bearers shall be coterminous with the term of the board:Provided that the board may fill a casual vacancy on the board by nomination out of the same class of members in respect of which the casual vacancy has arisen, if the term of office of the board is less than half of its original term.
(3) The Legislature of a State shall, by law, make provisions for co-option of persons to be members of the board having experience in the field of banking, management, finance or specialisation in any other field relating to the objects and activities undertaken by the co-operative society, as members of the board of such society:
Provided that the number of such co-opted members shall not exceed two in addition to twenty-one directors specified in the first proviso to clause (1):
Provided further that such co-opted members shall not have the right to vote in any election of the cooperative society in their capacity as such member or to be eligible to be elected as office bearers of the board:
Provided also that the functional directors of a co-operative society shall also be the members of the board and such members shall be excluded for the purpose of counting the total number of directors specified in the first proviso to clause (1).

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 243ZJ

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 243ZJ: Number and Term of Members of Board and Its Office Bearers
Text: (1) The board shall consist of such number of directors as may be provided by the Legislature of a State, by law:
Provided that the maximum number of ...

Output: Federal Structure

Explanation: Article 243ZJ deals with 'Number and Term of Members of Board and Its Office Bearers' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Federal Structure'.


Article 243ZJ

Input:
निम्नलिखित अनुच्छेद पाठ की प्राथमिक संवैधानिक श्रेणी को वर्गीकृत करें:

Article 243ZJ: बोर्ड के सदस्यों और उसके पदाधिकारियों की संख्या और कार्यकाल
पाठ: (1) The board shall consist of such number of directors as may be provided by the Legislature of a State, by law:
Provided that the maximum number of ...

Output: संवैधानिक संघ ढांचा

Explanation: Article 243ZJ 'बोर्ड के सदस्यों और उसके पदाधिकारियों की संख्या और कार्यकाल' से संबंधित है जो तार्किक रूप से 'संवैधानिक संघ ढांचा' के संवैधानिक खंड के अंतर्गत आता है।


Article 246

Input: What does Article 246 of the Constitution of India guarantee or govern?

Output: Article 246 governs 'Subject-matter of Laws Made by Parliament and by the Legislatures of States'. The constitutional text states: (1) Notwithstanding anything in clauses (2) and (3), Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List I in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “Union List”).

Explanation: According to the Indian Constitution, Article 246 is titled 'Subject-matter of Laws Made by Parliament and by the Legislatures of States' and establishes the basic legal framework for this topic.


Article 246

Input: भारत के संविधान का Article 246 क्या गारंटी या नियंत्रण देता है?

Output: Article 246 'संसद और राज्यों के विधानमंडलों द्वारा बनाए गए कानूनों का विषय-वस्तु' को नियंत्रित करता है। संवैधानिक पाठ में कहा गया है: (1) Notwithstanding anything in clauses (2) and (3), Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List I in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “Union List”).

Explanation: भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार, Article 246 का शीर्षक 'संसद और राज्यों के विधानमंडलों द्वारा बनाए गए कानूनों का विषय-वस्तु' है और यह इस विषय के लिए बुनियादी कानूनी रूपरेखा स्थापित करता है।


Article 246

Input: Which specific article of the Indian Constitution outlines the framework for 'Subject-matter of Laws Made by Parliament and by the Legislatures of States'?

Output: Article 246

Explanation: The text of the Constitution of India establishes 'Subject-matter of Laws Made by Parliament and by the Legislatures of States' under the provisions of Article 246.


Article 246

Input: भारतीय संविधान का कौन सा विशिष्ट अनुच्छेद 'संसद और राज्यों के विधानमंडलों द्वारा बनाए गए कानूनों का विषय-वस्तु' के लिए रूपरेखा को रेखांकित करता है?

Output: Article 246

Explanation: भारत के संविधान का पाठ Article 246 के प्रावधानों के तहत 'संसद और राज्यों के विधानमंडलों द्वारा बनाए गए कानूनों का विषय-वस्तु' स्थापित करता है।


Article 246

Input:
Analyze the following legal scenario:

A regional administrative body implements a directive directly affecting the legal processes associated with 'Subject-matter of Laws Made by Parliament and by the Legislatures of States'. A legal team argues that this administrative action must strictly comply with the relevant constitutional guidelines. Which article must the team cite?

Identify the constitutional article and explain the reasoning.

Output: Potential relevance of Article 246.

Explanation: Article 246 specifically defines the parameters and rights governing 'Subject-matter of Laws Made by Parliament and by the Legislatures of States' under the Constitution of India.


Article 246

Input:
निम्नलिखित कानूनी परिदृश्य का विश्लेषण करें:

एक क्षेत्रीय प्रशासनिक निकाय 'संसद और राज्यों के विधानमंडलों द्वारा बनाए गए कानूनों का विषय-वस्तु' से जुड़ी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं को सीधे प्रभावित करने वाला एक निर्देश लागू करता है। एक कानूनी टीम का तर्क है कि इस प्रशासनिक कार्रवाई को प्रासंगिक संवैधानिक दिशानिर्देशों का सख्ती से पालन करना चाहिए। टीम को किस अनुच्छेद का हवाला देना चाहिए?

संवैधानिक अनुच्छेद की पहचान करें और तर्क समझाएं।

Output: Article 246 की संभावित प्रासंगिकता।

Explanation: Article 246 विशेष रूप से भारत के संविधान के तहत 'संसद और राज्यों के विधानमंडलों द्वारा बनाए गए कानूनों का विषय-वस्तु' को नियंत्रित करने वाले मापदंडों और अधिकारों को परिभाषित करता है।


Article 246

Input: Summarize Article 246 of the Indian Constitution in one line.

Output: Article 246 defines and outlines the constitutional provisions regarding 'Subject-matter of Laws Made by Parliament and by the Legislatures of States'.

Explanation: One-line summary based on the official title of the article.


Article 246

Input: भारतीय संविधान के Article 246 का एक पंक्ति में सारांश प्रस्तुत करें।

Output: Article 246 'संसद और राज्यों के विधानमंडलों द्वारा बनाए गए कानूनों का विषय-वस्तु' के संबंध में संवैधानिक प्रावधानों को परिभाषित और रेखांकित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के आधिकारिक शीर्षक के आधार पर एक-पंक्ति सारांश।


Article 246

Input: Provide a short 2-3 sentence summary of Article 246 (Subject-matter of Laws Made by Parliament and by the Legislatures of States).

Output: Article Article 246 establishes the fundamental framework for 'Subject-matter of Laws Made by Parliament and by the Legislatures of States' in the Constitution of India. It declares that: (1) Notwithstanding anything in clauses (2) and (3), Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List.... This article ensures constitutional governance over all related administrative and legal actions.

Explanation: Concise summarization synthesizing article title and description preview.


Article 246

Input: अनुच्छेद Article 246 ('संसद और राज्यों के विधानमंडलों द्वारा बनाए गए कानूनों का विषय-वस्तु') का एक छोटा 2-3 वाक्यों का सारांश प्रदान करें।

Output: अनुच्छेद Article 246 भारत के संविधान में 'संसद और राज्यों के विधानमंडलों द्वारा बनाए गए कानूनों का विषय-वस्तु' के लिए बुनियादी ढांचा स्थापित करता है। यह घोषित करता है कि: (1) Notwithstanding anything in clauses (2) and (3), Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List...। यह लेख सभी संबंधित प्रशासनिक और कानूनी कार्यों पर संवैधानिक नियंत्रण सुनिश्चित करता है।

Explanation: लेख के शीर्षक और विवरण पूर्वावलोकन का संश्लेषण करने वाला संक्षिप्त सारांश।


Article 246

Input:
Premise: (1) Notwithstanding anything in clauses (2) and (3), Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List I in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “Union List”).
(2) Notwithstanding anything in clause (3), Parliament, and, subject to clause (1), the Legislature of any State also, have power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List III in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “Concurrent List”).
(3) Subject to clauses (1) and (2), the Legislature of any State has exclusive power to make laws for such State or any part thereof with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List II in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “State List”).
(4) Parliament has power to make laws with respect to any matter for any part of the territory of India not included in a State notwithstanding that such matter is a matter enumerated in the State List.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India contains explicit rules or principles regarding 'Subject-matter of Laws Made by Parliament and by the Legislatures of States' under Article 246.

Output: Entailment

Explanation: The premise outlines the detailed legal rules of this article, directly entailing that the Constitution has explicit rules regarding this topic.


Article 246

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Notwithstanding anything in clauses (2) and (3), Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List I in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “Union List”).
(2) Notwithstanding anything in clause (3), Parliament, and, subject to clause (1), the Legislature of any State also, have power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List III in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “Concurrent List”).
(3) Subject to clauses (1) and (2), the Legislature of any State has exclusive power to make laws for such State or any part thereof with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List II in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “State List”).
(4) Parliament has power to make laws with respect to any matter for any part of the territory of India not included in a State notwithstanding that such matter is a matter enumerated in the State List.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत का संविधान Article 246 के तहत 'संसद और राज्यों के विधानमंडलों द्वारा बनाए गए कानूनों का विषय-वस्तु' के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम या सिद्धांत शामिल करता है।

Output: Entailment

Explanation: आधार इस अनुच्छेद के विस्तृत कानूनी नियमों को रेखांकित करता है, जो सीधे तौर पर यह दर्शाता है कि संविधान में इस विषय के संबंध में स्पष्ट नियम हैं।


Article 246

Input:
Premise: (1) Notwithstanding anything in clauses (2) and (3), Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List I in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “Union List”).
(2) Notwithstanding anything in clause (3), Parliament, and, subject to clause (1), the Legislature of any State also, have power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List III in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “Concurrent List”).
(3) Subject to clauses (1) and (2), the Legislature of any State has exclusive power to make laws for such State or any part thereof with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List II in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “State List”).
(4) Parliament has power to make laws with respect to any matter for any part of the territory of India not included in a State notwithstanding that such matter is a matter enumerated in the State List.

Hypothesis: The Constitution of India has completely omitted and contains no provisions whatsoever regarding 'Subject-matter of Laws Made by Parliament and by the Legislatures of States'.

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: The hypothesis directly negates the premise which is the actual text of the article defining this topic.


Article 246

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Notwithstanding anything in clauses (2) and (3), Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List I in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “Union List”).
(2) Notwithstanding anything in clause (3), Parliament, and, subject to clause (1), the Legislature of any State also, have power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List III in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “Concurrent List”).
(3) Subject to clauses (1) and (2), the Legislature of any State has exclusive power to make laws for such State or any part thereof with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List II in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “State List”).
(4) Parliament has power to make laws with respect to any matter for any part of the territory of India not included in a State notwithstanding that such matter is a matter enumerated in the State List.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारत के संविधान ने पूरी तरह से छोड़ दिया है और 'संसद और राज्यों के विधानमंडलों द्वारा बनाए गए कानूनों का विषय-वस्तु' के संबंध में कोई प्रावधान शामिल नहीं किया है।

Output: Contradiction

Explanation: परिकल्पना सीधे तौर पर आधार को नकारती है जो इस विषय को परिभाषित करने वाले लेख का वास्तविक पाठ है।


Article 246

Input:
Premise: (1) Notwithstanding anything in clauses (2) and (3), Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List I in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “Union List”).
(2) Notwithstanding anything in clause (3), Parliament, and, subject to clause (1), the Legislature of any State also, have power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List III in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “Concurrent List”).
(3) Subject to clauses (1) and (2), the Legislature of any State has exclusive power to make laws for such State or any part thereof with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List II in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “State List”).
(4) Parliament has power to make laws with respect to any matter for any part of the territory of India not included in a State notwithstanding that such matter is a matter enumerated in the State List.

Hypothesis: Several legislative amendments have been proposed over time to modify civil and criminal statutes in Indian law.

Output: Neutral

Explanation: While the hypothesis is factually true about Indian law generally, it cannot be verified (entailed) nor contradicted solely by the text of this specific article.


Article 246

Input:
आधार (Premise): (1) Notwithstanding anything in clauses (2) and (3), Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List I in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “Union List”).
(2) Notwithstanding anything in clause (3), Parliament, and, subject to clause (1), the Legislature of any State also, have power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List III in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “Concurrent List”).
(3) Subject to clauses (1) and (2), the Legislature of any State has exclusive power to make laws for such State or any part thereof with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List II in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “State List”).
(4) Parliament has power to make laws with respect to any matter for any part of the territory of India not included in a State notwithstanding that such matter is a matter enumerated in the State List.

परिकल्पना (Hypothesis): भारतीय कानून में नागरिक और आपराधिक कानूनों को संशोधित करने के लिए समय के साथ कई विधायी संशोधन प्रस्तावित किए गए हैं।

Output: Neutral

Explanation: यद्यपि परिकल्पना सामान्य रूप से भारतीय कानून के बारे में तथ्यात्मक रूप से सही है, लेकिन इस विशिष्ट लेख के पाठ द्वारा इसकी पुष्टि (अनिवार्यता) या खंडन नहीं किया जा सकता है।


Article 246

Input:
Classify the primary constitutional category of the following article text:

Article 246: Subject-matter of Laws Made by Parliament and by the Legislatures of States
Text: (1) Notwithstanding anything in clauses (2) and (3), Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List...

Output: Federal Structure

Explanation: Article 246 deals with 'Subject-matter of Laws Made by Parliament and by the Legislatures of States' which logically falls under the constitutional section of 'Federal Structure'.