thread_id stringlengths 4 7 | thread_title stringlengths 11 15 | section stringclasses 2
values | question stringlengths 10 94.4k | response_count int64 0 297 | response_1 stringlengths 6 18.8k ⌀ | response_2 stringlengths 0 104k ⌀ | response_3 stringlengths 3 67.2k ⌀ | response_4 stringlengths 14 33.5k ⌀ | response_5 stringlengths 4 14k ⌀ | response_6 stringlengths 6 12k ⌀ | response_7 stringlengths 4 11.2k ⌀ | response_8 stringclasses 270
values | response_9 stringclasses 236
values | response_10 stringclasses 216
values | response_11 stringclasses 192
values | response_12 stringclasses 177
values | response_13 stringclasses 161
values | response_14 stringclasses 149
values | response_15 stringclasses 138
values | response_16 stringclasses 124
values | response_17 stringclasses 116
values | response_18 stringclasses 103
values | response_19 stringclasses 95
values | response_20 stringclasses 88
values | response_21 stringclasses 83
values | response_22 stringclasses 82
values | response_23 stringclasses 79
values | response_24 stringclasses 79
values | response_25 stringclasses 75
values | response_26 stringclasses 70
values | response_27 stringclasses 65
values | response_28 stringclasses 64
values | response_29 stringclasses 60
values | response_30 stringclasses 57
values | response_31 stringclasses 56
values | response_32 stringclasses 53
values | response_33 stringclasses 54
values | response_34 stringclasses 54
values | response_35 stringclasses 52
values | response_36 stringclasses 48
values | response_37 stringclasses 51
values | response_38 stringclasses 44
values | response_39 stringclasses 43
values | response_40 stringclasses 42
values | response_41 stringclasses 40
values | response_42 stringclasses 40
values | response_43 stringclasses 38
values | response_44 stringclasses 36
values | response_45 stringclasses 32
values | response_46 stringclasses 32
values | response_47 stringclasses 30
values | response_48 stringclasses 29
values | response_49 stringclasses 29
values | response_50 stringclasses 27
values | response_51 stringclasses 28
values | response_52 stringclasses 26
values | response_53 stringclasses 26
values | response_54 stringclasses 26
values | response_55 stringclasses 29
values | response_56 stringclasses 25
values | response_57 stringclasses 27
values | response_58 stringclasses 25
values | response_59 stringclasses 25
values | response_60 stringclasses 27
values | response_61 stringclasses 26
values | response_62 stringclasses 24
values | response_63 stringclasses 23
values | response_64 stringclasses 22
values | response_65 stringclasses 22
values | response_66 stringclasses 23
values | response_67 stringclasses 22
values | response_68 stringclasses 22
values | response_69 stringclasses 22
values | response_70 stringclasses 24
values | response_71 stringclasses 22
values | response_72 stringclasses 24
values | response_73 stringclasses 23
values | response_74 stringclasses 21
values | response_75 stringclasses 23
values | response_76 stringclasses 20
values | response_77 stringclasses 20
values | response_78 stringclasses 20
values | response_79 stringclasses 20
values | response_80 stringclasses 22
values | response_81 stringclasses 20
values | response_82 stringclasses 19
values | response_83 stringclasses 19
values | response_84 stringclasses 19
values | response_85 stringclasses 19
values | response_86 stringclasses 19
values | response_87 stringclasses 18
values | response_88 stringclasses 19
values | response_89 stringclasses 19
values | response_90 stringclasses 16
values | response_91 stringclasses 17
values | response_92 stringclasses 16
values | response_93 stringclasses 16
values | response_94 stringclasses 14
values | response_95 stringclasses 14
values | response_96 stringclasses 14
values | response_97 stringclasses 13
values | response_98 stringclasses 13
values | response_99 stringclasses 11
values | response_100 stringclasses 11
values | response_101 stringclasses 11
values | response_102 stringclasses 10
values | response_103 stringclasses 10
values | response_104 stringclasses 10
values | response_105 stringclasses 10
values | response_106 stringclasses 10
values | response_107 stringclasses 10
values | response_108 stringclasses 10
values | response_109 stringclasses 10
values | response_110 stringclasses 10
values | response_111 stringclasses 10
values | response_112 stringclasses 10
values | response_113 stringclasses 10
values | response_114 stringclasses 11
values | response_115 stringclasses 10
values | response_116 stringclasses 10
values | response_117 stringclasses 10
values | response_118 stringclasses 11
values | response_119 stringclasses 10
values | response_120 stringclasses 10
values | response_121 stringclasses 10
values | response_122 stringclasses 10
values | response_123 stringclasses 10
values | response_124 stringclasses 10
values | response_125 stringclasses 10
values | response_126 stringclasses 10
values | response_127 stringclasses 9
values | response_128 stringclasses 9
values | response_129 stringclasses 9
values | response_130 stringclasses 9
values | response_131 stringclasses 9
values | response_132 stringclasses 9
values | response_133 stringclasses 9
values | response_134 stringclasses 10
values | response_135 stringclasses 10
values | response_136 stringclasses 10
values | response_137 stringclasses 9
values | response_138 stringclasses 10
values | response_139 stringclasses 8
values | response_140 stringclasses 8
values | response_141 stringclasses 8
values | response_142 stringclasses 8
values | response_143 stringclasses 8
values | response_144 stringclasses 8
values | response_145 stringclasses 8
values | response_146 stringclasses 8
values | response_147 stringclasses 8
values | response_148 stringclasses 8
values | response_149 stringclasses 8
values | response_150 stringclasses 7
values | response_151 stringclasses 7
values | response_152 stringclasses 7
values | response_153 stringclasses 7
values | response_154 stringclasses 7
values | response_155 stringclasses 7
values | response_156 stringclasses 7
values | response_157 stringclasses 7
values | response_158 stringclasses 7
values | response_159 stringclasses 7
values | response_160 stringclasses 7
values | response_161 stringclasses 6
values | response_162 stringclasses 6
values | response_163 stringclasses 6
values | response_164 stringclasses 6
values | response_165 stringclasses 5
values | response_166 stringclasses 5
values | response_167 stringclasses 5
values | response_168 stringclasses 5
values | response_169 stringclasses 5
values | response_170 stringclasses 5
values | response_171 stringclasses 5
values | response_172 stringclasses 5
values | response_173 stringclasses 5
values | response_174 stringclasses 5
values | response_175 stringclasses 5
values | response_176 stringclasses 5
values | response_177 stringclasses 5
values | response_178 stringclasses 4
values | response_179 stringclasses 4
values | response_180 stringclasses 4
values | response_181 stringclasses 4
values | response_182 stringclasses 4
values | response_183 stringclasses 4
values | response_184 stringclasses 4
values | response_185 stringclasses 4
values | response_186 stringclasses 4
values | response_187 stringclasses 4
values | response_188 stringclasses 4
values | response_189 stringclasses 4
values | response_190 stringclasses 4
values | response_191 stringclasses 4
values | response_192 stringclasses 4
values | response_193 stringclasses 4
values | response_194 stringclasses 4
values | response_195 stringclasses 4
values | response_196 stringclasses 4
values | response_197 stringclasses 4
values | response_198 stringclasses 3
values | response_199 stringclasses 3
values | response_200 stringclasses 3
values | response_201 stringclasses 3
values | response_202 stringclasses 3
values | response_203 stringclasses 3
values | response_204 stringclasses 3
values | response_205 stringclasses 3
values | response_206 stringclasses 3
values | response_207 stringclasses 3
values | response_208 stringclasses 3
values | response_209 stringclasses 3
values | response_210 stringclasses 3
values | response_211 stringclasses 3
values | response_212 stringclasses 3
values | response_213 stringclasses 3
values | response_214 stringclasses 3
values | response_215 stringclasses 3
values | response_216 stringclasses 3
values | response_217 stringclasses 3
values | response_218 stringclasses 3
values | response_219 stringclasses 3
values | response_220 stringclasses 3
values | response_221 stringclasses 3
values | response_222 stringclasses 3
values | response_223 stringclasses 3
values | response_224 stringclasses 3
values | response_225 stringclasses 2
values | response_226 stringclasses 2
values | response_227 stringclasses 2
values | response_228 stringclasses 2
values | response_229 stringclasses 2
values | response_230 stringclasses 2
values | response_231 stringclasses 2
values | response_232 stringclasses 2
values | response_233 stringclasses 2
values | response_234 stringclasses 2
values | response_235 stringclasses 2
values | response_236 stringclasses 2
values | response_237 stringclasses 2
values | response_238 stringclasses 2
values | response_239 stringclasses 2
values | response_240 stringclasses 1
value | response_241 stringclasses 1
value | response_242 stringclasses 1
value | response_243 stringclasses 1
value | response_244 stringclasses 1
value | response_245 stringclasses 1
value | response_246 stringclasses 1
value | response_247 stringclasses 1
value | response_248 stringclasses 1
value | response_249 stringclasses 1
value | response_250 stringclasses 1
value | response_251 stringclasses 1
value | response_252 stringclasses 1
value | response_253 stringclasses 1
value | response_254 stringclasses 1
value | response_255 stringclasses 1
value | response_256 stringclasses 1
value | response_257 stringclasses 1
value | response_258 stringclasses 1
value | response_259 stringclasses 1
value | response_260 stringclasses 1
value | response_261 stringclasses 1
value | response_262 stringclasses 1
value | response_263 stringclasses 1
value | response_264 stringclasses 1
value | response_265 stringclasses 1
value | response_266 stringclasses 1
value | response_267 stringclasses 1
value | response_268 stringclasses 1
value | response_269 stringclasses 1
value | response_270 stringclasses 1
value | response_271 stringclasses 1
value | response_272 stringclasses 1
value | response_273 stringclasses 1
value | response_274 stringclasses 1
value | response_275 stringclasses 1
value | response_276 stringclasses 1
value | response_277 stringclasses 1
value | response_278 stringclasses 1
value | response_279 stringclasses 1
value | response_280 stringclasses 1
value | response_281 stringclasses 1
value | response_282 stringclasses 1
value | response_283 stringclasses 1
value | response_284 stringclasses 1
value | response_285 stringclasses 1
value | response_286 stringclasses 1
value | response_287 stringclasses 1
value | response_288 stringclasses 1
value | response_289 stringclasses 1
value | response_290 stringclasses 1
value | response_291 stringclasses 1
value | response_292 stringclasses 1
value | response_293 stringclasses 1
value | response_294 stringclasses 1
value | response_295 stringclasses 1
value | response_296 stringclasses 1
value | response_297 stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
103986 | Thread-103986 | RouterOS | Please add support of MPTCP in RouterOShttp://mptcp.info.ucl.ac.be/pmwiki.phphttps://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/mptcp/documents/Thanks | 16 | MPTCP is an end-to-end protocol, so the router doesn't need to know anything about it in order for it to work - the endpoint (client PC) needs to have two (or more) interfaces on it in order for mptcp to work. If you can route two internal networks with policy-based routing to the Internet via multiple ISPs, then MPTCP... | MPTCP is an end-to-end protocol, so the router doesn't need to know anything about it in order for it to workTrue!the endpoint (client PC) needs to have two (or more) interfaces on it in order for mptcp to work.False, as it can be done with one interface and several IPs ad subnets.But MPTCP + simple TCP proxy(like hapr... | its more frequently referenced in "high-bandwidth" applications/uses, despite security issues.combined with ad-hoc routing protocols, like HWMP and especially CJDNS - make "networking" Enteriely DIFFERENT in Many respects, thanks to soft hand-over/roaming, WHEN its matured to "secure" state.personally was slightly more... | Two big use cases for MPTCP are link aggregation (load balancing) and link redundancy (fail over).While it is true it is end to end, it does not mean that it cannot be useful starting from the router.How ?On the "aggregation" router, establish a TCP tunnel with a "provider" router. If both endpoints of the tunnels are ... | I agree+1 | Then you just have to simply route customer traffic over that TCP tunnel, just like with any other tunnel.Bad idea. Any tunnel over TCP solution is bad (and should only be used if nothing else works for any reason). Read what TCP over TCP meltdown problem is. | makes all the sense to support from my pov. As example to setup VPN server in Mikrotik with MPTCP to manage different links (can be a local ISP connection and 5G connection).Where we are in the MPTCP at Mikrotik? | MPTCP is necessary only on the end devices unless it was a specific service in ROS that you were considering? | On the subject of the period table element, 'UNOBTANIUM",I would like to make the request to add...... drumroll please..............." DPI of encrypted packets " | ... drumroll please..............." DPI of encrypted packets "Would make the gear very expensive and not their market ...Yes it would be very nice to have but all the Cheap Basterds that love this TiK would have to go elsewhere for an adorable solution ... | You are absolutely right. I am looking forward to MPTCP integration in RouterOS. This will give Mikrtotik a strong competitive edge | Hey @8023, what's your use case?MPTCPdoesn't need any special support in the router itself, it's generally used between the app connection endpoints like from a mobile device or car to a central service. | @Larsa what folks are talking about is using MPTCP for "multi-wan" support.So the way I view the request is that MPTCP can be used a tunnel interface between two RouterOS using multiple/different paths. e.g. you had Mikrotik with two LTE modems, that connected to CHR at some VPS, with MPTCP sub-flows per modem to the V... | Well, L3 multipath/bonding shouldn't be mixed up with MPTCP which was mainly developed as an endpoint (app) protocol to facilitate transparent handover/failover/bonding.Sure, there are some special hacks to use it as a more general communication protocol but that's not very common ie you won’t find it as an checkbox op... | Isn't this the very thing that is done with peplink?I think usecase can be very good for critical services u want to protect and give high availability without having to do it on each server. | Peplink does not use MPTCP to do WAN bonding. While possible to do same WAN bonding using subflows and proxy, the standards around MPTCP aggregation are all about client-server communication, not networking bonding. And, I'm not sure there is too much value in /tool/fetch being MPTCP aware which is the original use cas... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
104266 | Thread-104266 | RouterOS | How do you set one of these up that's not public but can be used internally for company use?If you are wanting to setup an internal ( not exposed to/from the Internet ) btest server , just connect a Mikrotik router ( one one Ethernet cable needed ) to the LAN/inside of your network. Then go to the Mikrotik Winbox->tool... | 160 | Conceptually yes but don't expect huge results.Limited processor and only fast ethernet interfaces.You can use any Tik as btest server. | I did test your server from two remote locations (FL, OH). Both did work at the time, but I can no longer connect. That said, I swear that I did my best to stay away from exceeding the 10 minutes and followed the rules mentioned above. How can I tell if I inadvertently exceeded my time limit? I am trying to proof one o... | Tested for no more than one minute! Thank you very much for providing access to perform these tests. | Hi Tom, Thank you for providing this free test server.Also tested for less than a minute on an asymmetrical 1G/50M link from Berlin, Germany.Tx/Rx: 53.0 Mbps/955.7 MbpsKind regards, SecOps7 | Hi Tom, Thank you for providing this free test server.Also tested for less than a minute on an asymmetrical 1G/50M link from Berlin, Germany.Tx/Rx: 53.0 Mbps/955.7 MbpsKind regards, SecOps7Are you having any strange issues/problems with your "asymmetrical 1G/50M link from Berlin" ?If my math is correct , you have an up... | FYI - Today ( Monday 9:AM PST ) , I upgraded the btest server from CHR ROS version 7.7 to version 7.8All btest-jails have been cleared/reset.Happy btestingNorth Idaho Tom Jones | Are there any European servers that are up and working? I only get about 400 mbit to the US ones though my ISP is a gigabit fiber.I get about 900mbit using speedtest.netWhat's interesting though is that tools/profiling reports less CPU usage with speedtest.net at 900mbit than the local cpu stats show at 400mbit with th... | Are there any European servers that are up and working? I only get about 400 mbit to the US ones though my ISP is a gigabit fiber.I get about 900mbit using speedtest.netWhat's interesting though is that tools/profiling reports less CPU usage with speedtest.net at 900mbit than the local cpu stats show at 400mbit with th... | Running speedtest is from a PC ?Logical then that cpu is higher when running btest on the router itself.Except for packet handling.which it is designed for, the router does nothing in the former case.Btest can be pretty cpu intensive.As long as it does not reach 100 on a single core, i wouldn't worry about it. | Are there any European servers that are up and working? I only get about 400 mbit to the US ones though my ISP is a gigabit fiber.I get about 900mbit using speedtest.netWhat's interesting though is that tools/profiling reports less CPU usage with speedtest.net at 900mbit than the local cpu stats show at 400mbit with th... | Running speedtest is from a PC ?Logical then that cpu is higher when running btest on the router itself.Except for packet handling.which it is designed for, the router does nothing in the former case.Btest can be pretty cpu intensive.As long as it does not reach 100 on a single core, i wouldn't worry about it.Yeah that... | Re PC computer speedtest(s) verses Mikrotik's btest - any thoughts on this suggestion ?I think I would like to see an updated version of Winbox ( or something similar from Mikrotik ) where Winbox has a built-in btest server/client.This could enable the following types of speedtests :- PC Winbox btest ( speedtest ) to o... | Side noteThere is a tool which runs on windows natively, can be used as client and server. It enables just that.It is called... Btest.exe and available from MikroTik download section.But I like the idea to have it included in Winbox. | Side noteThere is a tool which runs on windows natively, can be used as client and server. It enables just that.It is called... Btest.exe and available from MikroTik download section.But I like the idea to have it included in Winbox.I am aware of btest.exe and I have use it myself many times. However , it's not popular... | Just for my own clarification. The current “Bandwidth Test” from the Winbox is not what we are looking for? This is what I use from Winbox itself without any issues. | Just for my own clarification. The current “Bandwidth Test” from the Winbox is not what we are looking for? This is what I use from Winbox itself without any issues.GregC ,Looking at your post/image , you are using a Windows computer that is running a Windows Winbox program. Your Winbox is then controlling a Mikrotik R... | Outside of mikrotik btest we also have speedtest.net which you can run both from router from a docker container and from client PC.Also something that is useful is this list of public iperf3 severshttps://github.com/R0GGER/public-iperf3-servers | Tom, Yes, makes sense. Thank you for your quick reply and taking the time to be thorough on your explanation. | I still think this is a bit strange.Iperf3 with a bit lower bandwidth usage uses about 40% of a single core.Speedtest, net uses about 20% of a singel core while having a slightly higher bandwidth | @TomjNorthIdahoThanks. | Thanks for the Server Tom, Decent result from a 1000Mbps/250Mbps line in South Africa | Thanks for the Server Tom, Decent result from a 1000Mbps/250Mbps line in South AfricaFor a tcp both directions at the same time, I would say you have an A+ stable Internet connection.Sustained flat lines during any speedtest/btest are always good.North Idaho TomJones | Re: ... MikroTik provides a public bandwidth test server ...Goooofffff eeee A I ?I provide this test server ( North Idaho Tom Jones ---- Not Mikrotik ) | Goooofffff eeee A I ?Another motherf–er that post ChatGPT reply on forum.... | Deleted ChatBotlike answer | Please provide a public bandwidth test server.Thank you in advance. | You might want to read the first post of this thread. | FYI - May 02, 2023I just now updated the btest serverFrom:7.8To:7.9All btest-jails ( IP access lists ) were reset/cleared during the ROS upgrade/update.IPv4:23.162.144.120IPv6:2605:6340:0:1b::4btest username:MikrotikBtestbtest password:MikrotikBtestNote:If you are btest-ing to my btest server - Please post your btest s... | ...I just now updated the btest server...Hello Tom, I did the bandwidth-test, but without result - see attachment.I do not know if my settings are OK..Should I wait 27h to repeat the test now? | @zhup[ color=#FFFFFF].[/color ]Why you continue uselessly to add white dot on forum?You want replace it later with spam link?Stop that behaviour. | @zhup[ color=#FFFFFF].[/color ]Why you continue uselessly to add white dot on forum?You want replace it later with spam link?Stop that behaviour.Hello rextended, Sorry for the confusion.I just wanted the text to be more readable as line breaks are ignored. | I just wanted the text to be more readable as line breaks are ignored.Are not ignored, simply add another one.Adding hidden text & similar is considered Spam and alert the SpamGPT that mark your user a spammer, but I see that this alert, on your case, is not needed... | I just wanted the text to be more readable as line breaks are ignored.Are not ignored, simply add another one.Adding hidden text & similar is considered Spam and alert the SpamGPT that mark your user a spammer, but I see that this alert, on your case, is not needed...Hello rextended, I had no bad intentions.Maybe your ... | What is present on picture are correct, but the blacklist is managed from T.J.N.I., and I can not know if your ip are on it. | What is present on picture are correct, but the blacklist is managed from T.J.N.I., and I can not know if your ip are on it.Thx for feedback.T.J.N.I. wrote that all btest-jails (IP access lists ) were reset/cleared during the ROS upgrade/update (it was done yesterday 02.05.2023).Therefore my ip should not be banned rig... | ...I just now updated the btest server...Hello Tom, I did the bandwidth-test, but without result - see attachment.I do not know if my settings are OK..Should I wait 27h to repeat the test now?Yo zhup ...Have you been able to btest to my btest server b4 ?Can you ping my btest server ?Try a TCP send - then a TCP receive.... | moderator actionHello Tom, I hope you are doing well.I am not able to make btest using the below server:
```
Pv4: 23.162.144.120
btest username: MikrotikBtest
btest password: MikrotikBtestI also can not ping your btest server from PC or Mikrotik router.I was doing my test from PC behind the NAT, but I could also check ... | Yo zhup ...Post a traceroute to my btest server.Also , what is your public IP address ?I can take a look at my firewall rules in my BGP & OSPF routers , and in the btest server lists.North Idaho Tom Jones | Yo , re:I was doing my test from PC behind the NATIf you are testing from behind a NAT/Fire-Wall , then there is probability that it will prevent some TCP and/or UDP tests to you and possibly from you.North Idaho Tom Jones | Yo , re:I was doing my test from PC behind the NATIf you are testing from behind a NAT/Fire-Wall , then there is probability that it will prevent some TCP and/or UDP tests to you and possibly from you.North Idaho Tom JonesThe direct test from the Mikrotik also didn't work.My public IP address is 2xx.xxx.x.xx.Below you ... | My public IP address is 2XX.XX.XX.XX.Your ISP probably has a problem | My public IP address is xxxx.Please remove quote and screenshot with my IP.Later I will edit my post. | Yo , Your IP address: x.x.4.14 was in the Address-List ( from a recent prior test ) , I just now cleared it. | Yo , Your IP address: x.x.x.x was in the Address-List ( from a recent prior test ) , I just now cleared it.Thanks for your help and time.Unfortunately, no matter on what I do the test, whether on a Mikrotik router or on a PC, the test runs, but there is no result.I don't know what the problem is. | My public IP address is XX.XX.XX.XX.Your ISP probably has a problemPlease remove more digits from IP address, as the ones you removed are added below. | There is a small undocumented specifics of using the btest programNote how the maximum traffic generation capacity of the device's processor is determinedScreenshot_6.jpgScreenshot_5.jpg | I was already thinking along that line as well.It seems this is only applicable for UDP streams, not for TCP.iperf3 works similarly. If you use UDP and do not specify bandwidth, it will default to 1Mb/s.I understood the reasoning is because using UDP it is possible to saturate the line completely, even causing disconne... | It seems this is only applicable for UDP streams, not for TCP. | Yo , Your IP address: x.x.4.14 was in the Address-List ( from a recent prior test ) , I just now cleared it.Hello Tom, if possible, could you please remove my IP address from your ban list again? | Yo , Your IP address: x.x.4.14 was in the Address-List ( from a recent prior test ) , I just now cleared it.Hello Tom, if possible, could you please remove my IP address from your ban list again?Zhup , I just now cleared the list again.North Idaho Tom Jones | Quick test from Alexandria, KY area, Verizon 5G home internet.btest.jpg | North Idaho Tom JonesHey Tom, just ran a quick test from the UK. Wasn't able to make a udp connection, but got a solid 30Mbps tcp connection.Many thanks!btest.png | May 22 2023This morning I updated the btest serverfrom ROS ver 7.9to ROS ver 7.9.1FYI - btest jails were reset/cleared againNorth Idaho Tom Jones | Ran a couple IPV4 tests from my 2116 in a data center in Utah on HE.net (10Gbps pipe).TCP hovers around 1Gbps, as high as 1400Mbps. CPU load on the 2116 is pretty minimal compared to the CHR.With UDP I'm able to saturate the full 4Gbps, smacking your CHR's CPU in the face at 100%, while the 2116 maxes out around 30% se... | June 06, 2023This morning , I updated the btest server.From: ROS version 7.9.1To: ROS version 7.9.2All btest-jail counters were reset/cleared during the ROS upgrade.North Idaho Tom Jones | From the SF Bay Area on Sonic 10Gbps fiber with a CCR2004. I tried to do TCP but it was much slower; I tried to restart the test and it stalled on connecting. Not sure if I'm in jail, I only had it running a couple minutes at most :]UDP:Tx cur: 3.9 Gbps avg: 3.9 Gbps max: 4.2 GbpsRx cur: 99.4 Mbps avg: 93.5 Mbps max: 2... | From the SF Bay Area on Sonic 10Gbps fiber with a CCR2004. I tried to do TCP but it was much slower; I tried to restart the test and it stalled on connecting. Not sure if I'm in jail, I only had it running a couple minutes at most :]UDP:Tx cur: 3.9 Gbps avg: 3.9 Gbps max: 4.2 GbpsRx cur: 99.4 Mbps avg: 93.5 Mbps max: 2... | I updated the btest server.From: ROS version 7.9.2To: ROS version 7.10All btest-jail counters were reset/cleared during the ROS upgrade.North Idaho Tom Jones | Hi, here are my results, from New Hampshire, USA. Hub66, gigabit home fiber.
```
user@device:~$ traceroute 23.162.144.120
traceroute to 23.162.144.120 (23.162.144.120), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 router.lan (192.168.88.1) 0.563 ms 0.494 ms 0.433 ms
2 100.64.XXX.XXX (100.64.XXX.XXX) 1.976 ms 2.322 ms 2.274... | I updated the btest server.From: ROS version 7.10To: ROS version 7.10.1All btest-jail counters were reset/cleared during the ROS upgrade.North Idaho Tom Jones | Just noticed a few moments ago ...It's gonna hit 1-million soonNorth Idaho Tom Jonesalmost-1million.png | Done. Is there any prize?1mln.PNG | Done. Is there any prize?1mln.PNGBartoszP , thanks for the 1-million screen snapshot.Only took 7 years and a petabyte to get there ...Re:Done. Is there any prize?I did get a free cup of coffee at work this morning , does that count ?North Idaho Tom Jones | Is there any prize?I did get a free cup of coffee at work this morning , does that count ?If you pass through Italy, you have a guaranteed bottle of wine and a pizza!Thanks again for the free service. | I updated the btest server.From: ROS version 7.10.1To: ROS version 7.10.2All btest-jail counters were reset/cleared during the ROS upgrade.North Idaho Tom Jones | I updated the btest server.To: ROS version 7.11All btest-jail counters were reset/cleared during the ROS upgrade.North Idaho Tom Jones | From NYC with Verizon FIOS fibre optic service contracted at 300 Mbps service.RouterOS 7.11 on CRS326-24G-2S+Tx avg: 338.5 Mbps max: 350.3 MbpsRx avg: 302.8 Mbps max: 307.4 Mbps | From NYC with Verizon FIOS fibre optic service contracted at 300 Mbps service.RouterOS 7.11 on CRS326-24G-2S+Tx avg: 338.5 Mbps max: 350.3 MbpsRx avg: 302.8 Mbps max: 307.4 MbpsTo me , it looks like they auto configure their bandwidth configurations with some extra bandwidth padding - which is a good thing.I do the sam... | I updated the btest server.To: ROS version 7.11.2All btest-jail counters were reset/cleared during the ROS upgrade.North Idaho Tom Jones | I create a new server for bw test on datacenter Jakartaif you come from Indonesia or Asia feel free use this bwtestIP : 103.161.184.37Username: midPassword: midtest | Thank you very much for the very useful free tool! | I create a new server for bw test on datacenter Jakartaif you come from Indonesia or Asia feel free use this bwtestIP : 103.161.184.37Username: midPassword: midtestWhat are your bandwidth QOS settings & time test limits on your btest server ?I ran a btest to it this morning and it started ramping up. I was waiting to s... | FYI;8 days ago I rebooted the btest server.Today , 8 days later , there has already been well over 1, 000 unique IPs that have performed a btest bandwidth speed test to the server.At that rate , that might be greater than 50+ thousand btest(s) a year. That's a lot of bandwidth & packets.North Idaho Tom Jones | Note:If you are btest-ing to my btest server - Please post your btest speed results and where you are located - All of us Mikrotik admins would like to know who , where and how-fastI recently dropped Xfinity and got our cities municipal Fiber Internet @ 3Gbps ( they have 10Gbps, but I need to upgrade somethings first )... | Hello, I work for a mail hosting provider, and while analyzing our spam traffic, we've noticed a significant amount of traffic originating from IP addresses with port 2000 open, identified as "MikroTik bandwidth-test server" on that port (with shodan). When we scan these IP addresses using nmap, it reports "cisco-sccp.... | FYIDuring the last two weeks , there has been 1, 525 unique Internet IP address that have performed btest(s) to the server.North Idaho Tom Jones | Again, it seems to not be working as it should.I see remote cpu load at 100%.And once again, big thanks for providing this service. | Again, it seems to not be working as it should.I see remote cpu load at 100%.And once again, big thanks for providing this service.Glad its not just me...... was about to ask something thing. | November 14'th 2023 - I updated the public access btest serverfrom ROS version 7.11.2to ROS version 7.12All btest jail access-lists were cleared when I rebooted this server after the ROS update/upgradeNorth Idaho Tom Jones | Bandwidth test with RB5009 and Zaram SFP+ module on a 1 Gb internet subscription. | niceIt is a good thing to see that when an ISP sells a 1 Gb internet subscription - that the customer can actually measure speeds to/from the Internet at 1 Gb internet subscription speeds. Where were you testing from ? | niceIt is a good thing to see that when an ISP sells a 1 Gb internet subscription - that the customer can actually measure speeds to/from the Internet at 1 Gb internet subscription speeds. Where were you testing from ?Testing took place from Arnhem in the Netherlands. Provider is Delta. | Dec 26. 2023Moments ago , I updated the btest server I manage.Was CHR ROS ver 7.12.1Now CHR ROS ver 7.13All btest time based access lists /address lists were cleared during the upgrade/rebootNorth Idaho Tom Jones | ISP just upgraded me to what they claimed was 1.6gbps ...Thanks to your server i was able to test that !M9XmUKYk0U.png | ISP just upgraded me to what they claimed was 1.6gbps ...Thanks to your server i was able to test that !M9XmUKYk0U.pngI like your ISP , they say they are selling you a 1.6 Gig account and-however you are able to speedtest/measure 1.7 Gig --- nice. Many ISPs over sell what they can deliver. | Im having problems reaching your server it might be a regional problemi did a traceroute from 2 locations still couldnt reach the servers ip the last ip it reached from both was 23.162.144.1 (probably the main router of your server)Im from greece central macedoniaboth locations use the same isp they're also using the s... | the btest CHR ROS speedtest server I maintain was just now updated- from ROS ver 7.13- to ROS ver 7.13.2 | Im having problems reaching your server it might be a regional problemi did a traceroute from 2 locations still couldnt reach the servers ip the last ip it reached from both was 23.162.144.1 (probably the main router of your server)Im from greece central macedoniaboth locations use the same isp they're also using the s... | If you are able to traceroute to 23.162.144.1 , then you made it to my networks.Try it now , I just rebooted the btest server.* also note - this btest server has some rules which require a wait delay until you can re-test again.What is the IP address you are coming from ?Do you have a firewall somewhere you are going t... | OK - If you see your IP address list in the image below - and you continue to btest to my btest server without waiting 24 hours between btests, I am going to place your IP address on a 1-year block.All of the IP addresses listed below were supposed to wait 24 hours - but did not wait the required 24-hours. Which then a... | Using the test server in the first post I was able to verify the connection bandwidth provided by my ISP. Results are 2.2/1Gbps, which is good given a SLA speed of 2.5/1Gbps.This was recorded using the UDP test. For newcomers, remember that depending on your firewall configuration, you might have to create a new rule a... | the btest CHR ROS speedtest server I maintain was just now updated- from ROS ver 7.13.2- to ROS ver 7.13.3 | @TomjNorthIdahoI do apologize for running 3 tests last night before reading the rules. I will be sure not do that again. Also since this is the first time I have done one I didn't pay attention to the fact that you can set a duration flag. I sincerely appreciate the service you are providing.CHR on Vultr500 up830 downI... | @TomjNorthIdahoI do apologize for running 3 tests last night before reading the rules. I will be sure not do that again. Also since this is the first time I have done one I didn't pay attention to the fact that you can set a duration flag. I sincerely appreciate the service you are providing.CHR on Vultr500 up830 downI... | From GreeceProvider Inalan1G/1GMikrotik 5009 7.14 beta 8Thank you5009gr.JPG | Hello all, testing from São Paulo, Brazil, Vivo 200mbps fiber link:Captura de Tela 2024-02-02 às 07.27.52.pngI would love to know the reason for this see-saw behavior... | Hello all, testing from São Paulo, Brazil, Vivo 200mbps fiber link:Captura de Tela 2024-02-02 às 07.27.52.pngI would love to know the reason for this see-saw behavior...re: ... I would love to know the reason for this see-saw behavior... ...You were testing using TCP. TCP is a protocol that sends a packet and then wait... | Hey Tom, Thank you for the very good explanation! Makes total sense. I tried again this morning, with the first minute with UDP and the second minute with TCP:Captura de Tela 2024-02-03 às 10.33.40.pngThis is very interesting. With UDP, my download speed is close to the nominal, but the upload is ridiculous, 1mbps. Wit... | Hi, I'm new to mikrotik.I've seen last year an IT performing a bandwith test from another router mikrotik from another fiber line that I own but I can't remember the IP. He was telling me it was the official bandwith test from mikrotik. But As I read more and more from this forum there does not seem to be an official s... | He was telling me it was the official bandwith test from mikrotik.He's a storyteller or you probably misunderstood.About ping:EDIT: May 16'th 2022 - ICMP Ping has been disabled. in the btest server. ( This was done to prevent ping-speed tests against this btest server )Is the first line of the first post.Do you read wh... | He's a storyteller or you probably misunderstood.No I clearly not misunderstood, then it means that he really believes that's the official bandwith test server from mikrotik.Is the first line of the first post.Do you read what's written on the topic before writing anything?Yes and that's why I'm writing here because it... | ZERO DAYS on MikroTik bandwidth-test serverStop exposing your "MikroTik bandwidth-test server" on the internet, there is a zero days which allows any attacker to spam (mail) the entire world with spam via these machines open on the internet (example on: https://www.shodan.io/host/38.49.159.122)38.49.159.122:2000 | @mdadmin, what are you trying to imply and what source(s) are you relying on? Checkhttps://multirbl.valli.org/dnsbl-lookup ... 4.120.html | Hi! Appreciate the test server, super helpful for testing our bandwithTesting from Sydney, Australia (AS136582)Was able to pull 1.7G/1G Symettrical, 2.5G Tx and 2G Rximage (33).png | Mikrotik Speed TestI recently spotted this selection on one of my Mikrotik CHRs ( must be something that recently came out with a newer ROS version ).*** fyi - my network is allowed to do anything to my btest server ***Mikrotik-speedtest.jpgTools --> Speed Test | Today ( 3/21/2024 ) I performed the following on my public-access Mikrotik btest server I host.IPv4: 23.162.144.120IPv6: 2605:6340:0:1b::4btest username:MikrotikBtestServerbtest password:MikrotikBtestServer- ROS upgrade/updateFrom:7.13.5To:7.14.1- I also changed the btest username and passowordFrom:MikrotikBtestTo:Mikr... | Grateful for these very useful services. I had a problem from the first authentication attempt since on the first attempt it told me that it could not connect.I have no connection to the server. Is the service operational? | @TomjNorthIdaho - thank you for continuing to host this public btest server after so many years.Per your optional terms, this morning I tested from two IP addresses in western Wisconsin with the following results:68.65.62.x: 217.0 Mbps/138.4 Mbps TCP Tx/Rx Total Average64.33.160.x: 56.6 Mbps/121.5 Mbps TCP Tx/Rx Total ... | Hi all, Thanks @TomjNorthIdaho for the service!I did a test today 20 April 2024, ~12:19 CET. Ran it for 2 minutes.Tx/Rx 10s Average: 503.6 Mbps/770.6 MbpsTx/Rx Total Average: 2.3 Gbps/348.6 MbpsMikrotik model: RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnDFirmware: 6.49.10Source IP: 51.154.X.XLocaiton: SwitzerlandISP: Salt CHBandwith: 10Gbps sym... | Hey Tom, Thanks for providing the btest server.For some strange reason I cannot access it from x.158.1.25. I have accessed it before probably 2 days ago.traceroute herehttps://imgur.com/a/Y29k1ZAAny idea? | Hello MikroTik MemberI would like to do a speed test. Could I get the IP address and user name and password from Salt Switzerland please | IPv4: 23.162.144.120btest username: MikrotikBtestServerbtest password: MikrotikBtestServer | Oh ?That's the same as on the first post ? | re: ... That's the same as on the first post ? ...correct | damn I tried to connect before reading the new credentials and I think I'm in jail now, can't connect | Thanks for your wonderful service @TomJNorthIdaho!btest.pngLocation: Budapest/HungaryProvider Telekom, over Cable, Docsis 3 | Trying most recent credentials and it won't connect. My public IP I'm connecting from is 66.213.68.133. Did I get blocked? | Hi, I've also tried with 23.162.144.120 and get 100% of packets lost, maybe it's down?Thanks | Hi, 1 GB.Test carried out in Brazil, state of São Paulo. | I've tried in two different countries, on one works, on the other not.Somebody can suggest an alternative? Thank you!nonva.jpg | @zhup[ color=#FFFFFF].[/color ]Why you continue uselessly to add white dot on forum?You want replace it later with spam link?Stop that behaviour.Hello rextended, Sorry for the confusion.I just wanted the text to be more readable as line breaks are ignored.That is hilarious! Please MikroTik, give us a markdown editor! | @Tomwell done !! | May 31, 2024 - thank you Tom for continuing to host this public mikrotik bandwidth test server. Just tested from a client site after a faulty network cable limited their symmetrical speeds down to 100Mbps, and it was easy to connect to. | Tenho 2 mikrotiks e não consegui utilizar o btest com o IP 23.162.144.120, o que pode estar acontecendo? Fica conectando e não tenho nenhum retorno. | Tenho 2 mikrotiks e não consegui utilizar o btest com o IP 23.162.144.120, o que pode estar acontecendo? Fica conectando e não tenho nenhum retorno.Translated:I have 2 mikrotiks and I couldn't use btest with the IP 23.162.144.120, what could be going on? It keeps connecting and I don't get any feedback.@brunovgaPlease ... | Would you mind unblocking me and allow a 5gb test? | CroatiaTx/Rx Avg: 313.2 Mbps/349.1 MbpsActually i have a problem, my ISP sold a 1G/0.5G connection but i can download only cca 430Mbps. ISP modem is in bridge mode.ISP tech came and measured with his laptop connected directly to ISP modem 1G down so i think ISP side is ok.Anybody have idea how to configure mikrotik to ... | Of course there is "the one Mikrotik" and everybody immediately knows what is wrong just by glimpse. | I seem to have a probem on IPv6 - I see that connection(s) are up from firewall connection list, but traffic does not flow (only few kb/s rates are seen in torch). Strangely Bandwidth test reports remote CPU load as 100%. IPv6 transfer/speedtests to other IPv6 locations work OK.snap 2024-07-07 at 13.54.17.png | I got TX/RX average of 2.2 Gbps/1075.2 Mbps to 23.162.144.120 from Switzerland while showing me local CPU utilization of 7% and remote utilization of 100%. This is on a 10Gbps domestic fiber connection that should actually go all the way to 10Gbps since it is point to point. | Hi Tom, great that you support the community this way! Thanks.I just tried from 4 different locations and I always get "can't connect"... Has some other settings been changed? I've always used TCP/both directions... | I just tried from 4 different locations and I always get "can't connect"... Has some other settings been changed? I've always used TCP/both directions...Same here | Yeah, it seems to be down ;(But there is analternative server on the forum | @TomIs the passw changed? Using the one written in the first post, gave error "Authentication Failed".Kindly Regards | Yup , I have it down for now.It was getting tons of abuse by many other Mikrotik network admins.I was seeing whole /24 & /23 & /22 networks where almost every IP address in ( customer ) nework blocks would sequentially one-after-another perform a btest to my Mikrotik btest server.When I see this type of network-block s... | It was getting tons of abuse by many other Mikrotik network admins.May God let them *** in atrocious suffering.EDIT: added quote for clarification.... | Sad sad world ...Abusing a free service in such a way. I totally understand your point of view.Wild ideaFree for first x attempts, then paying ? | Or only 1 attempts a day for the same /24... | @TomSuper-absolutly understandable, just asking why I had that error.Thanks a lot for your kinda answer and for the service you always offered to the community.Have a nice day, Greetings | I'm very sorry that because of one stupid guy we all loose chance to usa a very precious service.Unfortunately this is humanity, stupid people existing.Maybe you can find a way to give a chance of 10 seconds test for each IP a day, maybe this can protect you from those mads. Thank you!. | Today ( July 29 2024 ) , The public access btest server I maintain is again now on-line.This btest server was renumbered and the user name / password to access the btest have been changed.IPv4:23.162.144.123IPv6:2605:6340:0:1b::123btest username:North-Idaho-Btest-Serverbtest password:I-Am-Not-A-Cron-ScriptThe maximum/f... | Today , I upgraded/updated the btest server I maintainFrom: CHR ROS version 7.15.2To: CHR ROS version 7.15.3all btest-jails were cleared during the reboot - so go ahead and give it a try.North Idaho Tom Jonesedit - note: If you don't mind ... Please post your results. Many of us like to know if you are getting your exp... | Thank you for providing this!I tested from Germany on a VDSL 100/40MBit link. I got 90 MBit/s receive, 37 MBit/s send with IPv6+TCP. | Cheers Tom, I put the wrong figure in so I had to backtrack. Sorry!Anyway... UK Test requested 230/25 I do use FQ_Codel.
```
/tool/bandwidth-test address=23.162.144.123 direction=both protocol=udp local-tx-speed=25M remote-tx-speed=230M user=North-Idaho-Btest-Server password=I-Am-Not-A-Cron-Script
status: run... | I am about 8000 km away and my 250M/250M connection gives excellent readings with UDP streamssnap 2024-08-10 at 03.03.09.pngsnap 2024-08-10 at 03.02.42.png | Thank you a lot for this opportunity mateI?ve tested it from Saint Petersbug (Russia), I got 26mb download (while speedtest gives 77) and 41mb upload (while speedtest 88), so I guess it may be a fragmentation problem, or simply the interconnections between countries aren't that good, maybe because thye are checked/fire... | Today ( July 29 2024 ) , The public access btest server I maintain is again now on-line.This btest server was renumbered and the user name / password to access the btest have been changed.IPv4:23.162.144.123IPv6:2605:6340:0:1b::123btest username:North-Idaho-Btest-Serverbtest password:I-Am-Not-A-Cron-ScriptHi, I can't p... | Hello, this is my result on a 2Gb/600Mb (up/down) connection from Poland. Thank You very much for hosting this test server.mtbtestIdaho.png | Hy Tom Jones!I try to btest from Hungary, but it dosn't work.here is my setIP 23.162.144.123btest/btestI tryd another North-Idaho-Btest-Server/ I-Am-Not-A-Cron-Scriptbut is the same problem.Please could you help to me.Thomas form Hungary | Address: pucelaonline.comuser: btestpass: btestBandwidth 10Gbps[/quote]its work for me thanksToday ( July 29 2024 ) , The public access btest server I maintain is again now on-line.This btest server was renumbered and the user name / password to access the btest have been changed.IPv4:23.162.144.123IPv6:2605:6340:0:1b:... | here is my setIP 23.162.144.123btest/btestauthentication failed | here is my setIP 23.162.144.123btest/btestauthentication failedOBVIOUS.Si ingresa username y password aleatoriamente y sin significado, ¿qué espera lograr? | I just updated the Mikrotik public btest server I maintain to ROS version 7.16IPv4: 23.162.144.123IPv6: 2605:6340:0:1b::123btest username: North-Idaho-Btest-Serverbtest password: I-Am-Not-A-Cron-ScriptNorth Idaho Tom Jones | Thanks for the effort. | Thank you! | post from: NorthIdahoTomJonesFYI - I rather like the newer ROS speedtest utility ( winbox -> Tools --> Speed Test ).I tested this using one of my customer's 25-Meg wireless account.winbox-speedtest.png | Thank you @TomJNorthIdaho - I ran three bandwidth tests from three different client networks this morning and even tested your 8-minute test limit. Good news is that it workedand thank you for continuing to host and manage the infrastructure for this valued service. | Thank you.This will help with being able to test my multiple sites on bandwidth issues.My results.Protocol: tcpDirection: bothTx/Rx Current: 2.0 Mbps/34.8 MbpsTx/Rx 10s Average: 19.6 Mbps/55.9 MbpsTx/Rx Total Average: 15.8 Mbps/62.0 MbpsLooks like I need to contact my IPS | Thank you for the test server!The path from EU - Slovakia to Idaho decreased the speed a bithowever stil OK for the basic test.TCP Download 46.0Mbps local-cpu-load:27%TCP Upload 87.6Mbps local-cpu-load:40% remote-cpu-load:20%UDP DownloadUDP Upload 185Mbps local-cpu-load:40% remote-cpu-load:10%Not sure why UDP down did ... | Thank you, very useful to confirm Xfinity service 500/20 plan: 1 minute average was 24.2 Mbps/604.5 Mbps | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
107751 | Thread-107751 | RouterOS | I'm activating a new PPPoE server, a CCR1009, and for the first time i saw this message, when pppoe clients where connecting:
```
18:51:16pppoe,infoPPPoEconnection establishedfromEC:08:6B:XX:XX:XX18:51:16pppoe,infoPPPoEconnection establishedfromEC:08:6B:XX:XX:XX18:51:16pppoe,ppp,info,account xxx-yyy loggedin,146.247.ab... | 2 | did you ever get a solution to this? I'm seeing the same error message with a pptp-client connectionPPTP server is on CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+ (tile) 6.49.8 | Forget about pptp, there are a lot better alternatives.It can be anything, from poor implementation to issues with CGNAT, which didn't existed when pptp was designed. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1093556 | Thread-1093556 | RouterOS | We made a table with some clarifications, can you guys let me know if this clears up some confusion? I see thatDocumentationandYouTube videostill leaves some questions unanswered. So let's try it like this:split2.jpg | 91 | at least for me this is fair enough | If any edge cases are missing in the table, let us know, and we will make the ULTIMATE guide for packages | i think Youtube video does a good job clarifying most of the situation.What happens is that it is a complicated turning point, not achievable on a videois not only the wireless matter, the reduced storage memory on some generation of devices, new generation of wireless devices, new operating system, 802.11ax etcwe can ... | If any edge cases are missing in the table, let us know, and we will make the ULTIMATE guide for packagesThe unfortunate position of the RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD w.r.t. WiFi support could be clarified better. | Shame. From YT and press notes I was under impression that it will be possible to have wifiwave, legacy CAPsMAN and use onboard wifi interface | Shame. From YT and press notes I was under impression that it will be possible to have wifiwave, legacy CAPsMAN and use onboard wifi interfaceShame? On contrary, a respect for MikroTik. They did exactly the opposite of planned obsolescence.MikroTik brought new software to old 802.11ac ARM devices. Now you can have 802.... | If any edge cases are missing in the table, let us know, and we will make the ULTIMATE guide for packagesThe unfortunate position of the RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD w.r.t. WiFi support could be clarified better.Same here ... the Situation for the RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD is not 100% clear for mebr, Richard | Easy, like manual says RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD-IN (no support for the 2.4GHz interface). Installing the new driver will remove 2GHz, only 5GHz will work | plz dont forget the mipsbe with AC gear.... also need some tunning in drivers!!!! | plz dont forget the mipsbe with AC gear.... also need some tunning in drivers!!!!mipsbe devices' CPU is underpowered and hardly manages decent throughputs even with legacy wireless. New wave2/wifi is even more demanding on CPU (specially for memory). | Easy, like manual says RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD-IN (no support for the 2.4GHz interface). Installing the new driver will remove 2GHz, only 5GHz will workBut it is not in that table. It should be in that table, and also there should be a clear warning on the website.Remember this is not some old obsolete product. This is a p... | Table is about specific products, it is said above each table. Products not in the table - not supported. Think about it that way. I don't see RB133c either. What could it mean? | Perhaps the RB4011 deserves a footnote in the @normis table, given you lose 2.4Ghz with qcom-ac?Similar with Audience, it needs a footnote too. e.g. it's pitched as "meshable", but that requires manual configuration with qcom-ac to wireless "mesh". | According to the compatibility table RB4011 with wireless package in dual-capsman configuration internal WiFi interfaces with legacy drivers must work. But both internal wifi interfaces in cap mode can't connect to legacy CAPsMAN. Have tried with shared network interface and with dedicated pseudo-lo bridge:/caps-man ma... | One suggestionPost what driver is needed on device page.It will be easier | Suggestion: we the MikroTik user base, need an abstraction. You know the hardware. Let us learn the software. By mixing everything it is really getting confusing. I think a better approach is needed. A single abstraction layer that figures it all out for us. As users we just implement generic WiFi concepts.So, one wifi... | Legacy wireless config is so much different in some places. So it would take an extra effort for MT developers to get an abstraction right. They would need to expose different config options depending on hardware and installed wireless/wifi package. Look at all these nv2/ and all the other massive wireless options (bas... | plz dont forget the mipsbe with AC gear.... also need some tunning in drivers!!!!mipsbe devices' CPU is underpowered and hardly manages decent throughputs even with legacy wireless. New wave2/wifi is even more demanding on CPU (specially for memory).Actually, I would love to have my "wAP ac/hAP ac" devices managed by t... | I think the issue is that CAPsMAN is not really a management layer for an abstracted WiFi device, but just a tool to copy a block of configuration data from the local device to the managed devices. That is why you also need to install the WiFi drivers on the CAPsMAN management device, even when it is not running WiFi a... | ...So there is no chance of the new version managing old devices. When that would have been practical, they could have done it already....But I would not hold my breath...They said that hap ac2 won't ever get WifiWave2, and there we have it, and it is working great. So maybe, just maybe, Mikrotik could give us another ... | Easy, like manual says RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD-IN (no support for the 2.4GHz interface). Installing the new driver will remove 2GHz, only 5GHz will workI checked the product page:https://mikrotik.com/product/rb4011igs_5hacq2hnd_inand the manuals there have no mention of this limitation. It would be fair to at least mention... | It's not obsolete at all.It's your choice to use the wave2 package with its limitations or not.The fact 2GHz radio is not usable anymore when you use wave2 drivers on RB4011 is already known for almost 2 years since 7.1 came out. | It would be great if you can help to splitwifi-qcom-acin 2 packages, only one IPQ4019 or QCA9984 driver ?Due to hap ac2 has space limit while upgrade to this version with zerotier package space need another 117 kB more, log are said like thatThis split may help to fixed this issue, as we can reduce size of package.If i... | The fact 2GHz radio is not usable anymore when you use wave2 drivers on RB4011 is already known for almost 2 years since 7.1 came out.It has been a problem for two years, yes. But there is no explanation why this problem even exists. In any other Linux system you can separately install drivers for each device without h... | Let's not forget, ROS is, while based on it, not as flexible as Linux.I think the base problem on RB4011 is effectively that there are 2 different chipsets used, one for each of the radio bands and somehow ROS is only able to use 1 driver: either legacy, either wave2. But not both.However, that's pure speculation from ... | It's a pity for all of us who bought this model as "powerful enough to be future-proof for at least a few years" and now it's declared obsoleteThe device isn't obsolete, 2.4GHz Wifi is obsolete. | Certainly not !2.4GHz spectrum is crowded (definitely !) but far from obsolete.There are still appliances being brought to market today only having 2.4GHz capability.Floppy disks are obsolete although I HAVE seen a setup some months ago where they still used 3.5" floppies ...nostalgic feelings ! | I would have expected that now that you can have BOTH management menus available at the same time, you would be able to do this on a RB4011.I assume their legacy wireless is not just a driver alone. possibly the legacy wireless has interaction with several system modules (routing/firewall) and makes it impossible to ha... | The page shows that "New Capsman only controller" needs "routeros" only, while the video "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkBIQxi-VKs" shows that "Package since 7.13" for "CAPsMAN for up to WiFi5 APs" is "routeos+wireless". Which one is correct? | Because you are quoting "new capsman ONLY", but video talks about old WiFi5 devices, which in the table is "running two capsmans at the same time" (old + new) | The page shows that "New Capsman only controller" needs "routeros" only, while the video "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkBIQxi-VKs" shows that "Package since 7.13" for "CAPsMAN for up to WiFi5 APs" is "routeos+wireless". Which one is correct?For using the old CAPsMAN, the (additional) wireless package is required.Th... | Because you are quoting "new capsman ONLY", but video talks about old WiFi5 devices, which in the table is "running two capsmans at the same time" (old + new)In other words, a switch like CRS326-24G-2S+IN that acts as new capsman only just needs routeos 7.13 without package "wifi". On the other hand, an AP like RBwAPG-... | Correct. | Correct.There seems something wrong. I set AP managed by CAPs but CAPs can't find AP's wifi interface. Any advice? Thanks. | Read the table again | Read the table againYes, I read it again. My AP runs with routreos + wifi-qcom-ac and is waiting for capsman's control. My switch acts as new capsman with routeros but cannot find AP's wifi interface. Because the table does not mention the switch device but wifi device only, I am not sure whether my switch needs wifi-q... | If they are on the same network, the CAP's should be able to find the CAPsMAN.Have you seen this part:https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ ... ionexample:It requires an edit on the default CAPs mode.Or as an alternative, share the config of both CAPsMAN and CAP:
```
/exportfile=anynameyoulikeRemove serial and any ot... | If they are on the same network, the CAP's should be able to find the CAPsMAN.Have you seen this part:https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ ... ionexample:It requires an edit on the default CAPs mode.Or as an alternative, share the config of both CAPsMAN and CAP:
```
/exportfile=anynameyoulikeRemove serial and any ot... | According to the table RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD should run dual capsman using `routeros+wireless` package. Hereviewtopic.php?t=202640people are struggling to have it running. Looks like CAPsMANs are conflicting each-other. Can we get a clear statement if it stable and possible at all for the particular product?Any hint for ... | It's not obsolete at all.It's your choice to use the wave2 package with its limitations or not.If all other currently sold top-tier devices support it and one model support is dropped for "new" drivers and if you want the feature that all others have, you have to use "legacy" drivers that will lack new functionality, t... | RB4011 comes with wireless functionality enabled out of the box. You can simply use it as it is. But Changing package to another one is optional and at your own risk. It is in the documentation that RB4011 is not compatiblehttps://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ ... patibility | It is mentioned deep down in the documentation, but NOT on the product specification sheet, where this of course belongs.Just like there is:Note: Passive DAC (MikroTik S+DA0001/S+DA0003) are not supported.on the product page, there should also be:Note: the new WiFi drivers are not supported.Even when you decide to keep... | Like I said, the product comes preinstalled with a working wireless package and there is no reason to change it to anotherone. If YOU decided to do this, it's in the manual, but it is not an advertised feature for this model. Does a BMW come with a specification note that engine from diesel to gasoline can't be changed... | Do you even READ what is written?Again: when an RB4011 (or any device) is upgraded from 7.12.1 to 7.13, an unusable WiFi menu is added.This takes up space on the device (a real problem on e.g. the hAP ac2!!!) and also it causes winbox to fail saving sessions.Reported before.So to be clear again: this happens when NOT o... | when an RB4011 (or any device) is upgraded from 7.12.1 to 7.13, an unusable WiFi menu is added.It's not unusable, it is required for managing ax devices via capsman. | Normis wrote that the new driver is not supported on the RB4011. So it is unusable.When there is some specific use for it, move it into an optional package so those that need it can install that.While those that do not need it can continue to use their device as it was sold. | Normis wrote that the new driver is not supported on the RB4011. So it is unusable.Capsman for managing qcom-ac/qcom devices is possible even without installing any qcom-* package at all. So basically any ROS-device 7.13+ can be capsman for devices that are using new drivers.So not unusable - but bloat for many users. | Do you even READ what is written?Again: when an RB4011 (or any device) is upgraded from 7.12.1 to 7.13, an unusable WiFi menu is added.This takes up space on the device (a real problem on e.g. the hAP ac2!!!) and also it causes winbox to fail saving sessions.Reported before.So to be clear again: this happens when NOT o... | Well, on the hAP ac2 the extra space is a real issue, because despite being advertised as "16MB flash" in reality it has only 15.3MB flash, and the code for ARM is also bigger than for MIPSBE. So a hAP ac2 with 7.13 (with wireless package) is filled to the brim and fails once you configure a lot of features or maybe ha... | the config code for the new drivers should be in qcom-ac* or in a wifi package, so that you will not install it when using the classic drivers.The configuration and common parts should belong to a separate package called something like "qcom-common" or alike. So one can still install/have the capsman for qcom-ac/qcom o... | Again: when an RB4011 (or any device) is upgraded from 7.12.1 to 7.13, an unusable WiFi menu is added.This takes up space on the device (a real problem on e.g. the hAP ac2!!!)WiFi menu is usable to manage CAPsMAN. You can ignore it, just like you can ignore BGP menu, SNMP menu and others.And so the RB4011 issus is most... | Again: when an RB4011 (or any device) is upgraded from 7.12.1 to 7.13, an unusable WiFi menu is added.This takes up space on the device (a real problem on e.g. the hAP ac2!!!)WiFi menu is usable to manage CAPsMAN. You can ignore it, just like you can ignore BGP menu, SNMP menu and others.Unfortunately, no. I have a win... | Again: when an RB4011 (or any device) is upgraded from 7.12.1 to 7.13, an unusable WiFi menu is added.This takes up space on the device (a real problem on e.g. the hAP ac2!!!)WiFi menu is usable to manage CAPsMAN. You can ignore it, just like you can ignore BGP menu, SNMP menu and others.And so the RB4011 issus is most... | What about 60GHZ product like Wap 60G?If i upgrade to 7.13+ i see both Wifi and wireless, i takes more space on the device and it doesnt let me install our branding packages anymore due to spaceas far as i can see, i cant uninstall the Wifi part, and if i uninstall the wireless part, it frees up space but i lose the W6... | What is the sollution here?The solution is to stay at 7.12.1 and pray that MT will manage to get space problems under control. | Yes, I hope that MikroTik consider to promote 7.12.1 to "long-term" and apply possible security fixes in the future.The 7.13+ versions have those issues and it looks like it is going to take time to iron them out, in the meantime "we" want to have a version we can keep running in production situations. | What is the sollution here?The solution is to stay at 7.12.1 and pray that MT will manage to get space problems under control.Jip, that is what im going to do as for now.To bad they implement things not designed for the device it will run on. like wifiwave2 wifi menu on 60GHz devices..... i dont see the point in hat on... | The solution is to stay at 7.12.1 and pray that MT will manage to get space problems under control.Jip, that is what im going to do as for now.To bad they implement things not designed for the device it will run on. like wifiwave2 wifi menu on 60GHz devices..... i dont see the point in hat oneRight or wrong. Their logi... | +1For a long term stable Vers 7.12.1 variant! | +1 For a long term stable Vers 7.12.1 variant!+1 | Mentioned long term in release topicviewtopic.php?t=202423#p1042578but no response... Maybe it should be replied to thisviewtopic.php?t=201378#p1035120 | Do you even READ what is written?Again: when an RB4011 (or any device) is upgraded from 7.12.1 to 7.13, an unusable WiFi menu is added.This takes up space on the device (a real problem on e.g. the hAP ac2!!!) and also it causes winbox to fail saving sessions.Reported before.So to be clear again: this happens when NOT o... | only wifi is visible in the mobile app, also old CAPsMAN devices are missing from the interfaces. Any clue?There have been complaints about the iOS mobile app in another thread, see...viewtopic.php?t=203149On top of top wlanX not showing up in the Advanced menus. Even without CAPsMAN running, it does NOT let you set th... | In the end I don't understand this package-approach at all.Just build a main-package for each ARM device!So we don't have to mess around with wifi packages and confuse users.Device: D53G-5HacD2HnD- Main package with Legacy Wireless- Main package with Qcom driversNo package manager overhead. No other overhead. No confus... | Yes, a bit more RAM usage for larger npk (Qcom ax+ac), but it I think all devices should be able to handle that, it will be more cleaner process for upgrade. Upgrade process should be able to detect which drivers you need for device and install them. | So we don't have to mess around with wifi packages and confuse users.If you just follow /system/package/upgrade...theoretically, all should work fine & if not, it's a bug IMO. It's only when you want to use the "new drivers" on an old device that take messing with packages. But foisting the wifi-qcom-ac drivers would b... | Suggestion is to have 2 packages, Legacy and Qcom, not forcing new Qcom drivers. Qcom bundle can contain ax+ac drivers and upgrade process can install drivers only needed for device, device will not have both ax and ac drivers on flash storage if upgrade process is a bit "smarter". | Personally, all care about is the packages I used before still fit.The "how" is kinda less important – but moving to "more monolithic" doesn't seem like the right direction, but maybe.One benefit with the wireless/qcom being seperate in 7.13+, is it allows wi-fi to be remove if it's not needed in an install...Now... st... | Problem is that npk install script is dumb copy all files process from package to ROS fs location, when having all Qcom drivers in single package it will need to first check device peripherals and copy only needed driver files (it will be the same at the end like installing ac or ax separately), in this case user will ... | is dumbIf I worked at MikroTik as a programmer the problem would have already been solved, in fact, it probably would never have been created, because I would have done everything in a more logical way:you only download the drivers (and optional features) you need based on the model, without downloading and installing ... | The problem is that MT (especially Normis position on that) declines "more granular" package splits so we can reduce flash-usage as much as possible.Every few days a new forum topic is created where a confused user is puzzled by 7.13. It is very unclear for the regular user to understand this "split" and the difference... | @infaboWe have no guarantee that the staff who PROGRAM RouterOS will ignore our comments.Probably our reports and proposals on the forum are not even passed on to the programmers, just because those of the staff who read the forum do not consider them worthy of note.Like this:viewtopic.php?t=198641#p1022672On 7.13.3 st... | Update 9 inviewtopic.php?p=1054314#p1054314This raises questions of business continuity.Moving from /interface/wireless ("wireless") to /interface/wifi ("wifi-qcom" and "wifi-qcom-ac") may cause service interrruption.If you have a mixed bag of devices, some 802.11ac other 802.11ax, then you need wifi-qcom on the CAPsMA... | We made a table with some clarifications, can you guys let me know if this clears up some confusion? I see thatDocumentationandYouTube videostill leaves some questions unanswered. So let's try it like this:split2.jpgCan you split base package even more? Please make VPN functionality as separate optional package. Media/... | Well, on the hAP ac2 the extra space is a real issue, because despite being advertised as "16MB flash" in reality it has only 15.3MB flash, and the code for ARM is also bigger than for MIPSBE. So a hAP ac2 with 7.13 (with wireless package) is filled to the brim and fails once you configure a lot of features or maybe ha... | I was running 7.13 (routeros+wireless package) and barely had enough room to create a backup (running config) file to the flash drive.Well, you are not supposed to create a backup to the flash drive!In those 16MB devices the Files section points to a RAM disk and flash is a subdirectory of that (where space on flash is... | Well, you are not supposed to create a backup to the flash drive!In those 16MB devices the Files section points to a RAM disk and flash is a subdirectory of that (where space on flash is mounted).You should make your backup in the root directory and then download the file to another device.Not sure what you mean by thi... | We made a table with some clarifications, can you guys let me know if this clears up some confusion? I see thatDocumentationandYouTube videostill leaves some questions unanswered. So let's try it like this:Sorry I'm very new forgive me if this chart explains it, but if i go to the suppot & downloads page under the mode... | As an end user you only need to do this:- upgrade the router to 7.12.1 via system->packages->upgrade when it has lower than that version- (reboot, that installs the upgrade)- upgrade the router to 7.15.1 via system->packages->upgradeThe router itself will automatically download the required packages and there is no nee... | well thats great when it works.... but that only answers if i want to auto update... it doesn't answer my other questions! | You did not tell us what device you have, and the answer depends on that.When you have a minimal device, there is little more that you can do than take a backup (both a .backup and a .rsc), and make sure you have the netinstall and image of the existing version available offline in case you need it.With a higher-end de... | So there is no chart that details the mikrotik devices model numbers and the current software compatible with or which version you should use for the device? It was a good thing you mention about upgrading to 7.12.1, the device that im working with is a RB2011UiAS-2HnD-IN using not by my choice 6.37.3. Im just not sure... | With that particular router it is possible to partition it.First check that you have less than about 40MB of flash in use, then go to partition menu, "repartition" to 2 partitions, router will reboot, then you can again go to "partition", select part0, do "copy to" part1, and you have saved everything on your router.No... | I did the do command but it isnt showing in files, how do i list the files and directories and move within them? | You will see the file when you used the export command correctly. | yeah I did that do "/export file=config", with and without the quotes but nothing shows up! For some reason i dont think its going to the right directory! Im using winbox terminal! | Well, of course it should be without the quotes and you should hit ENTER after it.And there should not be an error message.Anyway, do you have any special requirements and configuration or is it just your home router for an ISP?If so, check if you have a PPPoE interface or are using DHCP, note down how that is configur... | ill create a thread in the beginer basics. thank you! | And now you goto Files menu on the left side in winbox and you may have a file to click <Download> to download. | With temporary deleting DNS DoH certificates from my wAP R ac i can install the new wireless package without the need to netinstall (but i still probably should do that) | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | |
1097137 | Thread-1097137 | RouterOS | SwOS version 2.17 releasedhttp://www.mikrotik.com/downloadWhat's new in v2.17:*) added support for CRS320-8P-8B-4S+;*) added per-port Neighbor Discovery settings;*) added Reset Counter settings for individual ports;*) crs310g: fixed SFP module detection;*) crs312: fixed possible packet forwarding issue for 2.5Gbps link... | 10 | Thank you! When will we be able to collect sfp signals with snmp? | css610 host mac addresses per vlan? anytime soon? | css610 host mac addresses per vlan? anytime soon?CSS610 uses SWOS Lite. | css610 host mac addresses per vlan? anytime soon?SummarySwOS Lite is an operating system designed specifically for the administration of MikroTik CSS610 series switch products. CSS610 series switches support only SwOS Lite operating system.The main differences compared to CSS3xx series switches are:unsupported Independ... | a "no" then | Updated two CSS326-24G-2S+RM switches without any problems. | Been hit by the known upgrade issue ... lost access now to remote CSS106. Warning should stay in this forum.2.17 disappeared for CSS106 ? NOW the site says : " version 2.16 for new RB260GS(CSS106-5G-1S), new RB260GSP(CSS106-1G-4P-1S)" | Note. The new version is not released for the CSS106 models due to no changes to their specific firmware. | No serial port AFAIK. And no USB for Woobm serial.Device is more than 1200km from here. (There are 21 of those there.)I know that RB260 cannot make an IP outgoing connection (it does not do any IP routing, only responding on the same interface to the connecting MAC address).So what you see about upgrade in the web serv... | Updated three CSS326-24G-2S+ and one CRS326-24G-2S+ without issue.As expected, no update available for my two CSS106 switches. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
110145 | Thread-110145 | RouterOS | EDIT: Enabling strong-crypto for ssh sets these, I managed to miss this in my testing! Leaving this here for people arriving by Google.I discovered today that I could not SSH to any of my routers as a result of our new corporate security policy.The only MACs (Message Authentication Code, for other readers) that appear ... | 3 | You can enable strong-cryptohttp://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/SSH | You can enable strong-cryptohttp://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/SSHNow athttps://help.mikrotik.com/docs/spaces/R ... 350014/SSHorhttps://wiki.mikrotik.com/Manual:IP/SSH.But it doesn't seem to work on RouterOS v6 (tested with v6.49.. Enabled strong-crypto but I still can't connect without re-enabling SHA1 (disabled ... | Now athttps://help.mikrotik.com/docs/spaces/R ... 350014/SSHorhttps://wiki.mikrotik.com/Manual:IP/SSH.But it doesn't seem to work on RouterOS v6 (tested with v6.49.8 ).Unfortunately Mikrotik's documentation doesn't include history ... e.g. which ROS version brought certain feature or change in behaviour. So mostly it c... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1110112 | Thread-1110112 | RouterOS | RouterOS version 6.49.17 has been released in the "v6 stable" channel!Before an upgrade:1) Remember to make backup/export files before an upgrade and save them on another storage device;2) Make sure the device will not lose power during upgrade process;3) Device has enough free storage space for all RouterOS packages t... | 18 | Took a couple old 6.49.15 systems to 6.49.17 with no apparent issues after 30 minutes, FWIW. | hello, how about #[SUP-92244]: The Dude limited to 5 concurrent clients ? has it solved ?P | As it was already replied, please use v7 | hi normis, it intended for mikrotik training class (espesially mtcna) where we put the dude server on main router (rb4011) but not all of students can open it from their pc / notebook as it's limited to max 5 users on the same time. | Is the training material still on 6.49.x ? | Is the training material still on 6.49.x ?I hope so, v7 is still far away from a production-ready replacement. | I hope so, v7 is still far away from a production-ready replacement.Can you give a list of why its not production-ready? | Please make 6.49.17 Long-Term.And please, create the Long-Term chain on v7 also.This will help to avoid mimimis around "v7 is not production ready". | You can't please mimimis. | And please, create the Long-Term chain on v7 also.I had to use PIM in a v7-device, it is so stable as a house of cards.Every few days a "autosupout.rif" is generated, because something crashed internally.The Multi-WAN Wireguard-route-selection was fixed only in last 7.15.3.For easy setups, maybe, v7 is stabel enough. B... | Is the training material still on 6.49.x ?I hope so, v7 is still far away from a production-ready replacement.Da, da, da | hello, if possible, please add the following features (security reasons) for users who log-in into router :+ max active session on the same time for each apps; winbox, telnet, ssh, etc+ automatic logged out if inactive during certain durationthank you | You still forgot my #[SUP-126246]: Winbox IPv6 ND reachable time units. Cosmetic bug (works correctly and the value is specified in seconds, only Winbox and Webfig show wrong units label "ms" instead of "s"), but introduced in 6.47.10 which itself was a long-term release.Reported exactly one year ago, and the response ... | What's new in 6.49.16 (2024-Jun-07 10:02):(factory only release)Out of sheer curiosity - what device was released to the market with 6.49.16 factory installed?I plan to stick with v6 for a long time on RB931/RB941-2nD (the cheap basic routers which I give to customers for free with the service, tired of supporting chea... | I think most of the MIPS hardware gets v6 in factory still - given they are manufactured still.But what makes me wonder more than that:why was it necessary to release 6.49.16 without a single actual change? This maybe only makes sense for the purpose of raising the "factory-software version" property in routerboard. Bu... | Perhaps some of those v6-only hardware got R2 (with some slight HW changes, requiring minor changes in some device driver?) Since such change doesn't apply to already shipped hardware, ROS change can be factory-only (and it doesn't have to be publicly available since new devices can not be downgraded to older ROS to be... | Well, why not just mention that in changelog?"*) add support for model xzy rev4"all way too mysterious | Well, why not just mention that in changelog?When did MT make changelogs easily understandable? | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1110805 | Thread-1110805 | RouterOS | Is anyone here interested in volunteering to approve and disapprove new member posts? Let me know, and let's fight the AI/LLM spam together | 239 | Is anyone here interested in volunteering to approve and disapprove new member posts? Let me know, and let's fight the AI/LLM spam togetherIf you need a hand again, I'm here.In fact I noticed the slowness in removing spam and other problems.This time I'll just stop being an asshole, so I don't give any more problems.As... | Is anyone here interested in volunteering to approve and disapprove new member posts? Let me know, and let's fight the AI/LLM spam togetherThis time I'll just stop being an asshole, so I don't give any more problems....for how long? | This time I'll just stop being an asshole, so I don't give any more problems....for how long?The posts already present "speak" for themselves. | ...for how long?The posts already present "speak" for themselves.good | The posts already present "speak" for themselves.good | I am on quite a bit and can certainly assist in removing spam. I am also cat friendly.Some of my best posts are not actually my own!...gateau.jpg | I think the important point is that it is for "volunteering to approve and disapprove new member posts".Unfortunately, several moderators of the present and past cannot restrict themselves to only performing this task, and they drift away intopolicing others in how to write their articles, and edit articles when they a... | I think the important point is that it is for "volunteering to approve and disapprove new member posts".Unfortunately, several moderators of the present and past cannot restrict themselves to only performing this task, and they drift away intopolicing others in how to write their articles, and edit articles when they a... | I can do this. I’ve been moderating multiple web forums for many years. | Count me in as well if you need extra hands. | In fact, when I was the moderator they took it out on me, but then things continued the same even when I wasn't anymore, it couldn't have been me... If you know what I mean...Anyway I understand what you're referring to, but it seems to me that lately it has stopped ...It did not stop. My comments and many others were ... | Some tend to overuse the freedom of speech which is given to them arquing that "what is not forbidden is allowed". | Some tend to overuse the freedom of speech which is given to them arquing that "what is not forbidden is allowed".And others tend to abuse their moderator powers to impose their will that "what is not forbidden, should be." I believe Normis has weighed in a couple of times on that front. Stop spam, crap GPT posts, but ... | It is a perfect example how tough medaration process is ... do treat/respect others as you want to be treated/respected. | Well said... Which is exactly why I don't pretend to tell others how they should post so long as they aren't posting spam, inappropriate material, or otherwise abusing the forums. | I can help with this responsibility as well. IDK if a minimal amount of post is required for such task =) | I'll volunteer to help. | I am interested, i apply for it | I think the important point is that it is for "volunteering to approve and disapprove new member posts"....Moderation is as tough task as bringing up kids. Kids always find "a gate" in the well known but not written down rules and use it focusing on the particular part convinient for them. You ask to clean a desk so th... | You are right, and as I had already written to you, after going through it too, I understood the pressure both I and other users were giving you, and my apologies to you were due.I think Normis is looking for a moderator, not for 5 minutes a day, but for more time, otherwise the waits continue to be long.With the work ... | Rextended .. no need to apologize so many times.Life^H^H^H^H Moderation is unpredictable and sometimes tough. If you "accept a challenge" then there is no time to snivel | think Normis is looking for a moderator, not for 5 minutes a day, but for more time, otherwise the waits continue to be long.With the work I do, I have to be connected all the time, basically from 09:00 (CET) to 22:00 (CET) (if not longer…) 7 days a week.no. not againhow can I make that script? hmm... how many pipes?# ... | It did not stop. My comments and many others were simply deleted from the 7.10stable thread and many other threads. Any mention of poor software quality and boom, comment gets deleted.When a version is released there is a bold text "Please keep this forum topic strictly related to this particular RouterOS release."If i... | I think the important point is that it is for "volunteering to approve and disapprove new member posts"....Moderation is as tough task as bringing up kids. Kids always find "a gate" in the well known but not written down rules and use it focusing on the particular part convinient for them. You ask to clean a desk so th... | Editing posts to make them to your taste is NOT.Sounds very creepy.... | Editing posts to make them to your taste is NOT.Sounds very creepy....Yes, and it is what was going on.Quoted more lines than the moderator liked? They were cut in full - taking out all the context in that post. I understand some people don't like quotes longer than 2 lines, but sometimes one can't help it. And the for... | With the work I do, I have to be connected all the time, basically from 09:00 (CET) to 22:00 (CET) (if not longer…) 7 days a week.(yes, of course I also have a private life and I'm not in front of the computer all the time)And then I've already done it, so I already know how it all works.I can attest to the shocking am... | I've just a couple of simple requests for any future moderator: no more "quote" flame wars or deleted posts. Instead, please focus on spam.Thank you! | What the spam is ... let's see ...Spam isunnecessary, unwanted, or repetitive content that clogsinboxes andclutters social media feeds. The term “spam” has been used to refer to junk messages since the earliest days of the Internet.quoted from:https://blog.hootsuite.com/social-media ... ions/spam/ | I think all reasonable users can agree that spam is things like a post for p3nis enlargement or something else obnoxious and unrelated to the purpose of the form. Spam is not generally considered to be a user using a legitimate feature of the forum to quote or otherwise refer to another user's post. The mod's way of us... | The reason we get these AI generated reply messages that have to be moderated by a human, is that the board allows unlimited editing of user posts.Those bots (or lowly paid users) that port for the first time and put a ChatGPT-generated blurb (or just copy a message from earlier in the topic) is that they plan to wait ... | ....That's censorship and yhe imposition of one's view on the rights of another. Damn this conversation is so outrageous at this point. LEAVE OUR LEGITIMATE POSTS ALONE!Please decide if this post (reported to moderators) should be deleted or not?viewtopic.php?p=1009948#p1009948 | That's a different matter (whataboutism). What is you point? | BartosP, that post is not spam. It is not unrelated to Mikrotik or promoting another product or fake service. Why would it be deleted? It is someone expressing their frustration with the seemingly arbitrary way things are moderated on this forum. A sentiment echoed by a number of us. Just because people don't like it, ... | This is spam, detected from my SpamGPTviewtopic.php?p=968765#p968765 | This is spam, detected from my SpamGPTviewtopic.php?p=968765#p968765No one is arguing that legitimate spam or inappropriate posts shouldn't be removed. I'm all for it. I'm referring to the many edited by AnalForumMod with a Reason stating not to use quotes or whatever the language is. That's wrong! | How about the moderators "merging" topics and posts into categories, the repeated topics year in and out gets a bit useless. | Oh, some moderator just delete the post, after i post the link....viewtopic.php?t=142428#p1010120Another example...viewtopic.php?p=974018#p995612notice the hidden link to htt ps: / / sub *** way *** surfers. io/But SpamGPT still detect that | Examples from Rex, definitely spam.D E LThe previous one from BartoszP: clearly an argument and (for me) to be classified as freedom of speech. The tone is something else but there's no name calling, no playing man, only ball.You can agree to disagree in a civil way. | And the quote.... with hidden link inside.... to ht t p s:// 1 v 1 - l o l.io/viewtopic.php?p=995614#p976816 | Errm... rex ... you do know you're spamming this thread ? | This is the kind of arbitrary and unacceptable Mod crap I am referring to (pulled from a random post):Last edited by AnalForumMod on Thu May, 2023, edited 1 time in total. Reason: removed excessive quotting of preceding post; be wise, quote smart. lines of quote, 1 line of post.In other words, I the Mod don't like the ... | @holvoetnNo, I provide valid examples of spam...What SpamGPT can find.... (ok, the last)hidden link to ht t p s :// get- --- o.c om/ h o me/viewtopic.php?p=975133#p975133 | btw those posts are approved by moderators | btw those posts are approved by moderatorsI've always noticed it and I've never been fooled when I approved the posts...99.9% of spam comes from a big state, whose reputation I don't want to spoil, I don't know if it's correct to write it (it's not the Russians) | @mrz and Mikrotik staff - you all really have to start to have a more active role in ending the overzealous mod issue. This is your brand name and reputation. It's a Mikrotik owned forum. There are people literally abandoning the forum and your products because of the toxic experience they are subjected to by a very sm... | Moderators are getting confused ... delete all off-topic posts from this thread or not?"Freedom of writing" vs. "could you answer strictly to my question"?Deleting implies: You are bad guy who does not let us express our thoughts.Leaving them means: You are bad guy who does not clean topics from unwanted posts.No matte... | In Poland we say: No matter how you turn around, the ass is always in the back.In Italy one similar: The more you turn it, the more the s—t stinks... | The truth is: Any discussion is never strictly on the OP's topic.Resolved or not the problem, we will always talk about other things.Just look at all the topics already open... | In this thread a call for mod volunteers was made. Related to that very action are the responses of those of us that are trying to ensure that Mikrotik wisely chooses mods who don't abuse us in the course of posting to the forum. This is no unrelated. It's entirely on topic. Already demonstrated is a clear misunderstan... | Excuse me, but did you write it to me?Without the quote I don't get it | I concur, a simple question from Normis, has turned into a pile of doodoo. However, I do quite appreciate humour be it butt polish or shitty Italan! | So please go back to the topic .... some started to use offensive names and IMHO should be warned or their post should be moderated, let them speek/write ... they prove themselves what moderators are needed for. | I concur, a simple question from Normis, has turned into a pile of doodoo.You also put the paw (of your cat) on it | You guys crack me up ( which covers both the ass and the mierda ). | I think @pe1chl suggestion on edit limits and/or potential other BB controls is worth some consideration. Don't know what's possible, but more automation is generally a good thing & forces a rules-based approach.FWIW, while I actually like when mods truncate way-longer-than-necessary quotes ... it does seem like the co... | IMO, the quotation "issue" should be addressed using a BBEdit plugin rather than relying on the arbitrary judgment and preference of a moderator. | FWIW, while I actually like when mods truncate way-longer-than-necessary quotes ... it does seem like the consensus is moderators should not do this....The problem is when someone truncated a necessarily long quote. Save from reading it entirely - and understanding the context - it's really hit and miss.There is (was?)... | This will put any VI/EMACS discussion to shame.Seems more like a sed and awk problem to me. | Seems more like a sed and awk problem to me.Ah, a man of culture, I see. | This will put any VI/EMACS discussion to shame.Seems more like a sed and awk problem to me.where is that notepad when we need it most? | No matter what you do, there are some dissatisfied people.In Poland we say: No matter how you turn around, the ass is always in the back.That's funny that I thought it meant "you never see you own faults", or something like "it's hard to see the dirt on your own face". But you are correct, according to this Quora threa... | More or less ... it's obvious that same sayings could be applied in different contexts to different situations.In that particular situation you can read it as: Trying to satisfy all is as trying to see your own ass. | I am on quite a bit and can certainly assist in removing spam. I am also cat friendly.Some of my best posts are not actually my own!...gateau.jpgI think your cat is trying to say something to you. Is it concerned about the pile of junk on your keyboard? | You can't do three clicks without seeing a cat. They are a real pest. | I added a few new moderators that signed up for help. Their names are now green. This time I chose a few new people, who have not been moderating before.I hope the new (and old) moderators can:1. help approve posts and disapprove spam2. merge duplicate topics, or lock one of two3. not teach people how to quote or how t... | Great sum-up and good luck to all new moderators! | @chechito,@holvoetn,@martinclaro@tangent,@TomjNorthIdaho,(in alphabetical order)Congratulations! | @normisThis time I chose a few new people, who have not been moderating before.Diplomacy is not lacking, you have elected all(***) those who propose themselves as moderators, except one ().He's fine with the trial without the defendant knowing or defending himself on Reddit, right?Whatever happens, it will be a success... | yup, all good peeps, but how cannot argentina cry for rextended LOL He is now a shadow of himself, a mere rodent. | Where is the cat? | Where is the cat?You abandoned me on the Street. | Italian cats dont have nine lives LOL. Rextended is now a humble guinea pig.But fear not, I have fastened a llama saddle so that getting from point A to point B ( vinyard A to vinyard B ) wont take forever.....rodent-ride.jpg | @chechito,@holvoetn,@martinclaro@tangent,@TomjNorthIdaho,(in alphabetical order)Congratulations![insert spider man quote here] | I think someone pressed the "stow" button on the cats: | ––– | Thanks for giving me the opportunity to contribute @Normis! | I think someone pressed the "stow" button on the cats:I have only a "stew" button overhere. Let's see what it does.....oh no, poor animals...in China they would now call dinner!!In Guangdong and Guangxi provinces of the Lingnan cultural region, some—especially older—people consider cat flesh a good warming food during ... | ––– | @BartoszPCongratulationsto be back again mainly as a Moderator!CheckRedditfrom time to time, in case they put you under judgment too, without of course not being advised or given a chance to defend yourself... | I would have preferred Larsa ;-PP | I would have preferred Larsa ;-PP(I would have preferredALSO@Larsa)@Larsais one of those people who, if there's something that doesn't suit them, says things to your face, and it's very appreciable, compared to those who ruminate and plot behind your back. | Besides that I am easily seduced by half vampire, half promise of Santa Gifts and of course the soft caress of butterfly wings............... | I'm not sure he volunteered. Does seem like a thankless job if done right... | Thanks guys, but as Ammo pointed out, I didn't apply for it. | I'm not sure he volunteered. Does seem like a thankless job if done right...True dat, I am busy enough helping other people but have the sinking feeling that I wlll still see the spam before the dearly departed from regular posting do........ | [...]3. not teach people how to quote or how to write[...]If this forum had any decent rules and guidelines for users and moderators to follow (like any forum of this size should have), preventing abuse of certain annoying behavior from users, and preventing moderators from getting reports of "abuse of power", maybe yo... | If this forum had any decent rules and guidelines for users and moderators to follow[…]Here we have a little wild wild west sadly, no rules, no guidelines, just old grumpy angry users when they get punished in a way or another just because there's no rule telling them that what they're doing is bad/annoying for the maj... | Some of those were written over two decades ago, when "Netiquette" was a thing, sadly lost in the last years.Here we have a little wild wild west sadly, no rules, no guidelines, just old grumpy angry users when they get punished in a way or another just because there's no rule telling them that what they're doing is ba... | [...]Is time to delete the ~6500 users without posts [...]I was a member in a forum for over 5 years before I've made my first post in there.You have to be registered in forums if you want to see attachments.So having no posts is not something you should delete users on.Actually you should never delete users, just anon... | — Don't quote a post if you are the next person replying on the topic to the post immediately preceding. I.e. don't quote the post directly over yours. It is completely pointless and causes unnecessary clutter and reduces readability/information assimilation speed.The problem with that is that you cannot know if your p... | So at best you can quote and reply, and then later edit the post to remove the quote once it is obvious that you are immediately below it.+1 wish everyone had this common sense | [...]Is time to delete the ~6500 users without posts [...]I was a member in a forum for over 5 years before I've made my first post in there.So having no posts is not something you should delete users on.Actually you should never delete users, just anonymize them and their posts.you're right, but I'm talking about user... | — Don't quote a post if you are the next person replying on the topic to the post immediately preceding. I.e. don't quote the post directly over yours. It is completely pointless and causes unnecessary clutter and reduces readability/information assimilation speed.The problem with that is that you cannot know if your p... | If you need more hands, not problem to me. Would be glad to contribute to this forum.Regards. | The problem with that is that you cannot know if your post will be immediately below the one you are replying to [...]Sure you can, you get a warning to review your post when you hit submit if there are new replies submitted since you started writing your reply.Here, while I was writing this, @rextended posted two repl... | I didn't screenshot the whole page and I don't remember what's under your edit box, but if all the replies are still under your edit box, it's pretty easy to hit the quote button on the post you want to quote, which just inserts it at the cursor position.If not, you can always ctrl+c, close, quote, ctrl+v, submit.It's ... | Visited the forum for another reason and spotted this at the top of the list.I am mostly available from the 1st to 20th of each month and willing to help with moderation where I can.Hit me up if you are interested.ljb | I was absent for a few days and I see that discussion continues about the Netiquette ... good for all.[...]Is time to delete the ~6500 users without posts [...]I was a member in a forum for over 5 years before I've made my first post in there. ....Actually you should never delete users, just anonymize them and their po... | yes, we do that from time to time.we can't delete fairly new users, as they might be real people who read forum | …Posts are starting to disappear for no reason....Now let's see if they start accusing me on Reddit without even telling me, this time they can't blame me, let's see if Reddit users convince you on someone else....viewtopic.php?t=197438#p1010594viewtopic.php?p=1011219#p1010605 | Someone has been drinking vinegar... | Someone has been drinking vinegar...Not at all, search my name on Reddit....I didn't even know it, I discovered it by accident... | yes, we do that from time to time.we can't delete fairly new users, as they might be real people who read forumMaybe it's time to remove this column from "Memebrs" page? Or hide it to not let indexers read it? | yes, we do that from time to time.we can't delete fairly new users, as they might be real people who read forumMaybe it's time to remove this column from "Memebrs" page? Or hide it to not let indexers read it?Other forums require to write one initial post convincing the moderators that you are human and explaining why ... | Who will read it? | Might be a little bit off topic, but:Please make it possible for guests to see attachements without registration. Apart from a little bit more traffic, it has only advantages, for both the guest (can see images without registering) and MikroTik (less users only registering to see a picture).Thanks! | I don't want my top secret attachments to be seen by every unregistered Bob out there. | I don't want my top secret attachments to be seen by every unregistered Bob out there.Well, if this is the case, you should hire a consultant, force him/her/it to sign NDA and show him/her/it your top secret picture in a dark room without backlight switched on. Posting those pictures on this forum (unregistered users o... | I don't want my top secret attachments to be seen by every unregistered Bob out there.Well, if this is the case, you should hire a consultant, force him/her/it to sign NDA and show him/her/it your top secret picture in a dark room without backlight switched on. Posting those pictures on this forum (unregistered users o... | …Posts are starting to disappear for no reason....Now let's see if they start accusing me on Reddit without even telling me, this time they can't blame me, let's see if Reddit users convince you on someone else....viewtopic.php?t=197438#p1010594viewtopic.php?p=1011219#p1010605I have noticed this too. My opinion is that... | both post you are referring are from newly created accounts, a factor that you are not taking into accountthat accounts only have 1 post | both post you are referring are from newly created accounts, a factor that you are not taking into accountThat's correct, I did not take that into consideration. And I also did not do a google image search to see if the diagram was lifted from somewhere else to give credibility to the post. But this is going to be a ha... | Just $0.02 to show what mix of posts had to be moderated and we (moderators) have to decide what is a true post, what is a spam and what is a background for later abuse.If you see very valid and politically correct post "Thank you for sharing this info" then there is always a moment of frustration "do I delete very pol... | As a comment .. very fresh situation ...Let me think ... should moderators delete or not any of these posts? Lock topic?viewtopic.php?p=1011366#p1011366viewtopic.php?t=197557The first post was accepted so the second could be send with no accept and immediately poster drops an "cukoo's egg" to another topic. | Double posts are already discouraged.So I would remove the entry in the existing thread (and your response) and let the new thread survive.But that's me.However ... looking at the 11 earlier posts this user made (disregarding the dupe), a careful moderator may become suspicious.Not easy. | I was sure what has to be done but it is an open question, let say rethorical, to show some users that moderation is not an easy zero-one task and it falls into fuzzy logic territories | pity that someone has thrown my collaboration in the bin behaving like a vile coward, heeding the chatter on Reddit, without even being able to defend myself, otherwise this spam post:viewtopic.php?p=1011366#p996708(which of course theothermoderators didn't notice)would have already been deleted...The post was already ... | Thank you for pointing ... removed, banned | This "Forum moderation volunteers" topic that was actually "Post approval volunteers" turned into something else sadly, probably I've contributed too in this matter, but that's only because I want for this forum to have actual moderators with some actual rules to follow and to impose upon users.And no I'm not volunteer... | @Znevna…I rarely read anything useless from you.. | Znevna, what kind of rules you have in mind? | maybe sth like this:more user friendlyhttps://community.juniper.net/termsandconditionsor more law-focusedhttps://community.cisco.com/t5/communit ... -p/4661660and Znevna's suggestions:viewtopic.php?p=1010367#p1010367 | …I rarely read anything useless from you..Hmm, there are internet standards for these things...It takes two to tango.RFC 1855 - Netiquette Guidelines codeNetwork Working Group S. Hambridge Request For Comments: 1855 Intel Corp. FYI: 28 October 1995 Category: Informational Netiquette Guidelines [...] 3.0 One-to-Many Com... | Some guidelines from 1995 for mailing lists are hardly "standards" for forum use, but sure, it's a starting point. | My advice regarding "Code of Conduct" is to keep it short and concise with a maximum of three important guidelines. Additionally, include a welcome message that incorporates these guidelines for new members. For example:1. Make this a welcoming forum by addressing each other with respect and hospitality, especially tow... | 1. Make this a welcoming forum by addressing each other with respect and hospitality, especially towards new members.2. How to ask a question effectively (including details, exporting, formatting, etc.).3. How to answer a question effectively (including quoting, providing relevant examples, etc.).4. How to write a dece... | ... | When I read only "help" or only "info" as the title of a topic, I often question the writer's sanity.It seems to me impossible that anyone with a modicum of intelligence could not understand putting a pertinent title.Especially the idiots like "don't install 7.10 because when I installed it my wife tripped on the stair... | Some guidelines from 1995 for mailing lists are hardly "standards" for forum use, but sure, it's a starting point.The behavior of individual humans hasn't changed noticeably since 1995. It is true, however, that the aggregate behavior permitted by throwing all 8 billion online at oncehaschanged, which may require fresh... | There is a KISS rule .. it covers all problems in one short acronym but says nothing particular how to write pure, well structured and not too wordy posts. | Air Force One must then have routers installed with ROS 7.10 for quite some time.They now have a special stairs in the back of the plane. Far away from the routers in the front of the plane. Hope it helps.Update:good news, RouterOS 7.10 was not the cause of the tripping on the stairs. Potus also tripped on the special ... | Air Force One must then have routers installed with ROS 7.10 for quite some time.They now have a special stairs in the back of the plane. Far away from the routers in the front of the plane. Hope it helps.That flew over my head until I realized thecontext. | …thecontext.Thank you; me, too.Thus we see the value insomequoting, in this non-threaded forum. | The only people not adhering to common sense netiquette are right here in this topic. Most others just ask their questions and post their configs. | This is the last time I'm saying this. There is no rule that forbids quoting the above post. If you harass people about it, ban for you | This is the last time I'm saying this. There is no rule that forbids quoting the above post. If you harass people about it, ban for youYou see @normis, replies like that make this forum and the support staff great.Thank you! | This is the last time I'm saying this. There is no rule that forbids quoting the above post. If you harass people about it, ban for youYes! Sanity prevails! Thank you! | Non dire gatto se non ce l'hai nel sacco | Non dire gatto se non ce l'hai nel saccoE che c'entra?[And what does it have to do with it?] | Do you really want to make a difference( no not add zerotrust cloudflare tunnel to RoS, but that would be awesome )What I would like to see is a banner for NEW POSTERS.FIRST POSTING1. Provide an Accurate Title2. Provide a Network Diagram ***3. Provide your user based traffic flow requirements:a. identify all user(s)/de... | Wrong forum @anav, they don't want any rules in here.I wonder how are the bots supposed to know that they aren't allowed to spam.... | No its the right thread, if you are going to discuss half-assed measures, I m in the wrong thread. If you really want to improve forum threads and experience you might consider having an open mind.The intent is to make using the forum a better experience, think bigger picture than just spam. To me any request without g... | Wrong forum @anav, they don't want any rules in here.What @anav describes is roughly same as Normis 2010's pined post, "Getting the most out of this forum":viewtopic.php?t=45259You can make all the rules you want, but question is always enforcement. e.g. does no diagram, bad title, shitty description, etc --> delete po... | Clearly not working or good enough.If every new forum member has to acknowledge reading what I recommended, and its always available to review, thenwe should see the quality of posts go up and the resolution of issues much faster.If a new poster ( dont expect a trained IT professional to do the same of course ) fails t... | nice to see that the amount of mods has been increased. btw..how is this one guy allowed to repeatedly spam the release topics with his self-caused wifi problems, that are obviously unrelated to current ros releases? His problems are 100% caused by user error and the unwillingsness to rtfm. | Spam is different from stupidity?? Letting the parents breed (like cats ;-PP ) was the problem, mods can't fix that. | More moderators, but none with my experience, they keep getting fooled...viewtopic.php?t=177551#p1014254EDIT: (now @16:16 is deleted)[quote=Marki post_id=1014254 time=1689838584 user_id=218875]Great work, pal[url=hstps://<SpamGPT>apk.com/<SpamGPT>-life-simulator-mod/][size=1]<SpamGPT>[/size][/url]. I appreciate you eff... | I just wish you used kitty litter, always cleaning up after your messes, jajajaja | What? | I meant to say supporting your posts, geez cant a guy drink in the morning! | I hope that with new mods this is getting good results. Congratulations. | Again not familiar with the BB backend... But maybe a "solution" to @rextended's concerns about mod timezones is tohideflagged posted until it's been reviewed by a moderator? Perhaps that's limited to folks above a certain post count? | If it's the first post you must first be approved, otherwise no one sees them.The problem is that moderators often get screwed.They don't even check what's secretly written in the post, and they often approve ridiculous posts, watch the case of those who register just to write "cool!" and then after a few weeks change ... | It also has happened several times to me that a new member posted a copy of a reply I wrote further above in the topic. Just a 100% copy.They get approved as it seems a reasonable on-topic reply to the message, then they later change it to a spam.One countermeasure is to turn off editing of messages after some time has... | But preventing later editing of posts can be bad as well. An example is @anav's "how to" posts, and @pcunites vlan topic. it is nice for long time users to be able to edit the posts.If it is easy to limit users that are new or have few posts, that is a good idea to disallow editing, because these are the ones that are ... | When I was the moderator, and I was the one approving posts, this never happened to me once... | Don't stress the forum users with rules, you'll get a ban or at least a ban warning.But since there's no rule to prohibit editing posts and adding spam links, how should the bots know that it's not allowed? | Don't stress the forum users with rulesWell, you're doing it now...you'll get a ban or at least a ban warning.Are you tying to create a rule?No one was talking about quoting…Here we were talking about how to prevent spam from those who register only to spam the forum, not to impose other rules (what are the others?) on... | But spam isn't forbidden by current rules, because there are none.Get it? | But spam isn't forbidden by current rules, because there are none.Get it?Ah sorry, now I understand...My bad. | viewtopic.php?p=1015026#p1015026 | viewtopic.php?p=1018049#p1017933...More moderators to moderate what?They keep allowing topics like "no internet", "help me", "question". Seriously?Most of the posts are garbage and spam, and by spam I mean opening other topics to post the same thing for the umpteenth time.Moderators should delete those bulls–t, and dir... | yeahit never rains to everyone's liking | Hi guys is the forum Locked?i am trying to access and reply on different topics, and all showing up LOCKED. | Beta forum has been locked, yes.viewtopic.php?t=198462 | As far as I can see there are some moderators who still don't understand what spam is...viewtopic.php?p=1016624#p1016624viewtopic.php?p=1019312#p1019312viewtopic.php?p=1019315#p1019315 | thanks for reporting spam eliminated | thanks for reporting spam eliminatedvery thanks!!! | I guess we're going to have lower their pay.Is there really no plugin in the backend that can do this automatically??? Manually reviewing the tags in every message posted seem tedious. | Late to the party, I don't visit often. However, What I would like to reaffirm is that non paid mods need respect others and not let power do to their heads.Holvoetn recently told people off in the cap wave2 thread.viewtopic.php?t=170736I'd say, unless a paid mk staffer objected, then mind your opinion. As noted by rex... | Late to the party, I don't visit often. However, What I would like to reaffirm is that non paid mods need respect others and not let power do to their heads.Holvoetn recently told people off in the cap wave2 thread.viewtopic.php?t=170736I'd say, unless a paid mk staffer objected, then mind your opinion. As noted by rex... | Holvoetn recently told people off in the cap wave2 thread.Please quote what you found objectionable about those two posts, then explain the problem, because I don't see how either of holvoetn's posts in that thread are offensive in the slightest, in whole or in part.This gripe is so far off the mark I'm wondering if yo... | No kidding.Post #1:To mkx,@mkxtraditional capsman runs just fine in ROS7.You simply can not mix legacy and ww2 radios. It's one or the other.Don't install ww2-package = legacy radios onlyInstall ww2-package = ww2 radios only.Post#2:To posters discussing non MT product ( openwrt )Thin line, guys...Nothing about these tw... | i dont see any recent moderation logs on that topic, nor activity at all | i dont see any recent moderation logs on that topic, nor activity at allI don't find anything wrong with it either, indeed he did well to point out that when he registered on the forum he agreed not to talk about other "competing" products...But maybe he doesn't remember...When people don't know what to write, they sta... | "openwrt" can hardly be called a "competing product", right? | that's why the quotes | "openwrt" can hardly be called a "competing product", right?Why hardly? It's OpenWRT competing with ROS ... and commercial terms don't change this. | OpenWRT is software. MikroTik sells hardware, and includes software with it (RouterOS).I do not see that as competiting product. It is good to point to OpenWRT when comparing features and developments, but nobody would select OpenWRT where they would otherwise select RouterOS. They are completely different things. | Like @holvoetn wrote inthatthread: there's a thin line when discussing other products in MT's forums between OK and not-OK. Just because OpenWRT runs on MT's hardware it doesn't make it non-competing. When I last checked, MT was selling SW licenses as well. Another thin line is when discussion about 3rd party software ... | Openwrt is a free OS, which you may install on many devices produced by many vendors. No one earns money selling it, so it can´t compete with ROS.https://openwrt.org/licenseAlso it´s target userbase is quite different from the ROS users.Apart from all that: I don´t really see any harm for MT in discussing any software ... | As evidenced, @holvoetn was spot on, "thin line"... This seem like MT question...A free product is a competitor from business POV. Now I doubt Mikrotik cares if you're buying hardware and opting out of any support - but IDK. Since Mikrotik is unlikely to fix OpenWRT "compatibility", most forum convo are going to end wi... | Grounting a little ... twice ... I wouldn't want it to be taken as power going to my head but .... guys, you are hijaking this topic a little bitBTW ... do you imagine that football fan of e.g. Real Madrit FC starts topics on poor play strategy on e.g. Manchester City FC forum as they are not directly competing | I think my point was made quite well. Nobody from MT did anything about openWRT discussion. However, other people did.What comes next is that, that person is now a mod and can now take matters in their own hands.Interesting that some long term forum users think of the benefits of openWRTWithout hijacking the thread, op... | I think my point was made quite well. Nobody from MT did anything about openWRT discussion. However, other people did....who moderates the moderatorsMT as admins could jump into any discussion at any time and intervene if they decide that such intervention is needed. And they do. | Last News: Now the moderators on MikroTik forum make their own rules, and without giving warnings, they suspend your account for spoilers, on different products.Who was it that suspended my account?An admin or moderator who without even warning suspended my account?If that moderator can tell me where it is present in t... | Perhaps it was that you spammed the forums with like 6 separate SPOILER posts in short succession rather than put them all in one post?Ironic that one of those who takes a heavier handed approach with other forum users now complains when heavy handed approaches are taken with him... | Perhaps it was that you spammed the forums with like 6 separate SPOILER posts in short succession rather than put them all in one post?Theoretically different devices ... so different threads, to start a discussion about, potential, new devices... e.g. @rextended first thread in the "spoiler series" has 7K views forone... | Trying not too be a judge in a hood court but despite the views number, starting a lot of topics on not too much bringing theoretical discussions on nonexistent devices, don't you assume that someone could got angry that someone else is spoiling the market? You have a stock of devices and someone is announcing that soo... | This is ridiculous. I have my fair share of problems with Rextended - but suspend an account just because someone posted about a real future device? This is insane. If (IF, and he weren't) he was posting FUD or false information, it would be one thing.But just posting about future devices? No, this is not reason to sus... | If the suspension was due to spoilers, that's clear, but I agree that it's an exaggeration to suspend an account for this, since basically it's only reporting the models of future products, which although they say something, they don't It is not decisive enough to affect the products already on sale today. I just hope ... | @BartoszP, so was it you?Why don't you read in the logs who did it?And then, instead of grouping it together, it deleted everything...To@PaternotOr were you trolling someone else, @rextended?I didn't understand what you meant.@gabacho4 he saw those posts, so I'm not trolling at all...To@allI could have been suspended f... | @BartoszP, so was it you?My answer is .......MT as admins could jump into any discussion at any time and intervene if they decide that such intervention is needed. And they do. | Can you answer in a less vague way? | @BartoszP, so was it you?Why don't you read in the logs who did it?And then, instead of grouping it together, it deleted everything...To@PaternotOr were you trolling someone else, @rextended?I didn't understand what you meant.@gabacho4 he saw those posts, so I'm not trolling at all...To@allI could have been suspended f... | I can only say, its been rather peaceful of late and I have less cat hair on my clothes.Peace and Love, life is to short to sweat the small things! | This would be an example of over moderation IMO:viewtopic.php?t=200501The OP post is lousy, no doubt. But the cutting off discussion for asking a dumb question isn't the standard. Mikrotik does document installing an PiHole, so not entirely off-topic.No wonder why some people complain the forum is "unfriendly". Folks c... | As I was called to the blackboard ... OP reports problem, asked and the answer is that it is a problem of an Adblocker and no mention of any model of Mikrotik used. Yes we can try to persude the OP to use PiHole but are you sure that the OP has proper equipment? Users asked for locking and even deletion of the topic. D... | if off-topic persist i think can be considered spamif i had seen that topic also will be locked | For me the mistake is not immediately deleting the post, instead of replying.It has absolutely nothing to do with this forum. | In these cases that is difficult to infer from the first question.Almost all questions on this forum initially are vague, do not include any context, and require additional posts to get that info.At that time it may become obvious that the question is not related to any MikroTik software or hardware.I wonder if it woul... | Question and the first answer had no connection to Mikrotik even beeing asked for more details.We could elaborate on that specific topic but it is an opening for a discussion:Do we allow any questions as maybe at the end it will turn out that Mikrotik could be involved?Overacting a little bit: should we leave spams on ... | Question and the first answer had no connection to Mikrotik even beeing asked for more details.I don't agree with that!!The first question was clearly from a person with limited knowledge of English, and was about a problem that could be related to his router.Maybe he (or the admin of the router of which he is a user) ... | I do not agree ... asked .. answer was: AdblockerWhen I use Adblocker my YouTube video player has stopped.So it implies that Adblocker is the problem.I'm really interested how we could "mentally travel" from "when I use Adblocker .." asked on networking forum ... to ... "install PiHole on Mikrotik as it could solve the... | Is it so difficult to read, even for a moderator??I am talking about the initial question. It does not mention an Adblocker. How is the first question inappropriate for this forum, as rextended wrote: "For me the mistake is not immediately deleting the post, instead of replying."I don't see that. | Read also the title: "My Youtube Video player has blocked"There is no trace of anything related to MikroTik.Probably expressed myself badly, not being English:At the answerWhen I use Adblocker my YouTube video player has stopped, after the right questionWhy Mikrotik forum?it should have already been deleted all the top... | Is it so difficult to read, even for a moderator??Especially for Moderator ... how to read, understand and answer the way that noone would have doubts that the action taken is acceptableEdit:To most existensional modertor's question: To delete or not to delete? | Read also the title: "My Youtube Video player has blocked"There is no trace of anything related to MikroTik.Ok exercise for you: see this recent new posting:viewtopic.php?t=200911There is no trace of anything related to MikroTik.Should it be deleted? | Title: Lost managementI don't want to start a flame, but can't you really see the difference between a "Youtube Video player"and a near-clear reference to RouterOS configuration "bridge vlan ip filtering"?(Deduction: The user has activated the filter on the bridge with the wrong configuration, so it no longer reaches t... | Yup, Rextended is quite correct. Overall, I think the mods are doing a better job than before. Always a tad slow for my taste but I am on often.Where it gets interesting is the fact that they let openwrt threads and links to exist. I would mushroom cloud them out of existence. | The real moderators of the forum are the newly registered users who complain about nothing.They make long-lasting users disappear easier than moderators... | It's all about the expectations. When I opted in to being a moderator, the expected duties were pretty simple:delete spam and approve new posts.I can totally understand normis when hefavors positive attitude towards new beginners over the technical expertise of seniorjerksnerdsmembers(me included), because while withou... | People have said in the Discord, that they prefer Discord, as forum is a toxic mess where you get bullied. Not once. Several times. This has to be fixed. | This has to be fixed.Until now, the only outcome of this discussion was a few guideline posts being removed. | no. some other things were attempted. some people got banned, some got demoted from moderator status and got really mad | People have said in the Discord, that they prefer Discord, as forum is a toxic mess where you get bullied. Not once. Several times. This has to be fixed.I don't use Discord (too chaotic for me, don't use any other social channel either for the same reason) so I can not comment on what is being said there.I totally agre... | no. some other things were attempted. some people got banned, some got demoted from moderator status and got really madFor the ways used, not for himself of no longer being a moderator, if it wasn't clear yet. | I don't use Discord ...I just enter Discord and clearly see "same toxic reply", if not more toxic, also there...From Discord:If you're going to be an asshole who just wants to aggravate the moderators, maybe just go away?https://discord.com/channels/9362941909 ... 3412532274генаНА—12/07/2023 16:59HelloThe question may ... | no. some other things were attempted. some people got banned, some got demoted from moderator status and got really madI did not know MT was in the business of getting people mad.I think this forum is where one could get help. This discussion and the way MT handled the issue harmed the forum. | What discussion are you talking about?I am talking about how volunteer moderators are bullying new members. Some of them got their moderator status removed.This is a bad move? | I'm not concerned about who got bullied or who got banned.The only thing I'm talking about is the documents that are no longer available because of this discussion. | Which documents? | Which documents?He was referring to all the documentation and guides made by@Anav, which were often always better than the MikroTik documentation. | From@normis, post #160 on current topic.This is the last time I'm saying this. There is no rule that forbids quoting the above post. If you harass people about it, ban for youI'm not involved this time, but is yet another moderator war against quotas starting? (just for 4 more lines on post...)viewtopic.php?t=120957#p1... | Quoting shoold to be used limited, especially when you are first responder to that specific post. Then even do not qoute and just reply directly. | Quoting shoold to be used limited...I'm perfectly agree with you, but the only rule in this regard is not harass people about it...@Normishad written that way because is already happened on the past various times:Some new users who didn't care about quoting correctly had complained about@BartoszPbecause he was trying t... | Until now, the only outcome of this discussion was a few guideline posts being removed.I might be wrong, but I think @Anav foremost wants MikroTik to engage much more in practical matters regarding the forum on order to create better conditions to eliminate structural problems that unnecessarily often result in "frustr... | Everyone has their agenda. All I know is what usually brought me here is no longer here, which is not in the best interest of anyone. | Tryweb.archive.org.. | Larsa, I could kiss you but for fear of catching something dreadful, I will not.Yes, frustration and the like is but a symptom of not having enough process and structure at the beginning of a posters experience here.I am trying to address root causes and not focus on symptoms.I listed all the benefits of having a bit o... | .... is missing the boat........Some occasional one-time sailors who jumped into a new eye-catching boat starts to rock that boat as experienced sailors, who volunteered to pass people safe from one coast to another, didn't give them a hand dressed with a velvet glove but even dared to instruct them that the journey ne... | Why were @anav's guide threads deleted?New User Pathway To Config Successviewtopic.php?p=906567New User Posting For Assistanceviewtopic.php?p=908118#p908118Those were really useful threads with pointers to other relevant material.It's been a while since I have been here, but it seems that a lot of useful info was delet... | In short:There was topic where some of the new members complained about toxic environment on the forum and some senior members were called out. | the author of those posts, anav, decided to edit his posts and remove all the information, the reason for complete deletion might be tied to this.Here, some older version of those threads:http://web.archive.org/web/202310022244 ... p?p=906567http://web.archive.org/web/202401150259 ... 18#p908118Print them, frame them. ... | Is anyone here interested in volunteering to approve and disapprove new member posts? Let me know, and let's fight the AI/LLM spam togetherI would be interested in helping out with this. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | |||
1111696 | Thread-1111696 | RouterOS | Hi!We're heavy using Mikrotiks in our environment and automation is very important for us. We're generating the configuration for our network equipment via scripts/templates from a source of truth system. To be able to integrate the Mikrotiks better in that workflow (which we use also for enterprise switch vendors), we... | 9 | Nice, thank you! | Total noob question (sorry): Could this potentially be used to flash a lightweight Linux distro onto an arm-based routerBOARD? I just got in some CCR2216's and getting frustrated with the lack of features. It would be interesting to see alpine linux flashed onto it running FRR. | Could this potentially be used to flash a lightweight Linux distro onto an arm-based routerBOARD?No. RouterBOOT (Mikrotik bootloader) only boots up signed Mikrotik SW installed uing NPKs.To boot a 3rd party Linux kernel, you need a modified RouterBOOT. See here for an example on how to install openwrt on RB5009:https:/... | Regarding Aldrin2 (98DX8525) and similar Marvell ASICs, they aren't that secretive, IMO. In fact, they are just as eager as any other manufacturer to make their drivers compatible with Linux in order to sell more silicone. Although much information isn't available to the public, as a customer, you can access all specif... | This tool is amazing !Has anyone implemented a plugin to allow automatic detection and uploading of firmware depending on the device/arch detected?Thanks ! | Hey, I had face a problem with pynetinstall and i troubled it. so you can give me a some tips and tricks to fix it.Please create a ticket onhttps://github.com/dvtirol/pynetinstall/issuesand we take a look at itHas anyone implemented a plugin to allow automatic detection and uploading of firmware depending on the device... | Thanks for the project. I have Dnsmasq up and running on OSX and have installed pynetinstall but cannot get it to bind to a local ethernet port:
```
python -m pynetinstall -c ./pynetinstall.ini -i en0 -v
usage: pynetinstall [-h] [-c CONFIG] [-i INTERFACE] [-l LOGGING] [-v] [-1]
pynetinstall: error: [Errno 6] Device not... | That is awesome Mr Penz. Thank you so much. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | |
1111950 | Thread-1111950 | RouterOS | SwOS Lite version 2.18 releasedhttp://www.mikrotik.com/downloadWhat's new in v2.18:*) added option to set forced 2.5G for SFP+ ports;*) css610: added a distinct "Health" menu;*) css610pi: updated PoE firmware;*) fixed multicast forwarding after disabling IGMP snooping;*) fixed SNMP ifSpeed OID reporting in certain case... | 35 | Glad to see there is still development for this version.*) added option to set forced 2.5G for SFP+ ports;How do you set this ?Never mind, found it. Disable autonegotiation and then you can select. | Follow up:On CSS610 I set an S+RJ10 to forced 2.5Gb, connected to ether1 of AX3 using VLAN trunk.Link becomes active. So far so good.On AX3 log files I see it determines speed as being 2.5Gb, which is ok however ...nothing passes (after the facts I can see in log files what happened).Only when I enable autonegotiation,... | can we please please please get option 82 in swos lite! | Follow up:On CSS610 I set an S+RJ10 to forced 2.5Gb, connected to ether1 of AX3 using VLAN trunk.Link becomes active. So far so good.On AX3 log files I see it determines speed as being 2.5Gb, which is ok however ...nothing passes (after the facts I can see in log files what happened).Only when I enable autonegotiation,... | You should probably disable Auto Negotiation and fix it at 2.5Gbps on AX3 ether1 too...When setting speed fixed on AX3 -> No Link on CSS610, both with auto and no autonegotiation.Also visible on AX3, ether lights go out for that port. | When auto negotiation is disabled you often need a crossover cable. Auto-crossover is often also disabled if auto negotiation is disabled | I understand what you say but I don't understand why that would be needed... doesn't make sense from a practical point of view.Auto MDX is something from the previous century !Anyhow, SUP-146041 created. Let's see what support says about it. | I understand what you say but I don't understand why that would be needed... doesn't make sense from a practical point of view.Auto MDX is something from the previous century !Anyhow, SUP-146041 created. Let's see what support says about it.Actually I believe onnoossendrijver is correct, modern ethernet controllers use... | Got response from support.Some info provided both from CSS610 and AX3.In parallel I ordered some CAT6 cross-convertor plugs.We'll see ... | Final ordeal:it's (again) S-RJ10 acting up. It can not be controlled to set lower speed. | [quote=holvoetn post_id=1061562 time=1709846844 user_id=185526]Final ordeal:it's (again) S-RJ10 acting up. It can not be controlled to set lower speed.[/quote]Which revision of S-RJ10 are you using? There is a Rev 2Read about it | It is Rev 2.That module will adjust on its own to lower speed when needed (e.g. when connected to 2.5G port of AX3) but it can not be configured to do so (e.g. when connecting 2 S-RJ10 to each other and not wanting full 10G because it will burn your fingers). | Yeah they get really hot.I've read that they need to be set at a fixed speed.Can you try this on RouterOS also if you have CRS somewhere? | Good to see more development, I'm running a few Netpower Lite 7R devices currently at 2.17.Please consider feature requests for new releases:- option to not save all config changes immediately, instead keep them only in RAM, and have a separate "Save" button (this way previous working config can be restored by reboot/p... | If I go to the hosts screen... after about 20 seconds I get this at the top of the screen.ERROR: SyntaxError: Unexpected token '{' | yup, same here on two css610 | I'm not seeing that.Edge as browser on Win11. | If I go to the hosts screen... after about 20 seconds I get this at the top of the screen.ERROR: SyntaxError: Unexpected token '{'Confirmed on CSS610: | I'm not seeing that.Edge as browser on Win11.O..K ...it took a LOT longer then 20 seconds (just left the window open while I was doing something else).Now I see it as well. | It is always a good practice to refresh the page to avoid these kind of errors... | Help, I can consult in this forum, I only get a reply and when I reply I get | I was about to update a CSS610-8P. When I go to update it doesn't show the 2.18 firmware.Did something change or get taken down?https://cdn.mikrotik.com/swoslite/css61 ... i-2.18.binGives me a 503 errorEDITWent back to the Switch and Hit Upgrade and it found the upgrade and installed it.For some reason Chrome won't loa... | I can confirm the syntax error in the Hosts tab after upgrade to 2.18. Fresh Netpower Lite 7R device (default config) upgraded from factory 2.13 firmware. Tried two different browsers (Firefox and Supermium), I've never seen this error in 2.17 or older. Refreshing the page doesn't change anything, and actually Supermiu... | I upgraded from 2.17 to 2.18 and I receive the error on the Hosts page: ERROR: SyntaxError: missing ) in parentheticalI have the CSS610-8P and CSS610-8G models. | Also... I have ICMP ping set up in netwatch to the CSS610-8P.Every once in a while it will miss more than 2 of the 5 pings. I get an error note on the router as that's where netwatch is running, which is directly connected to the switch.But since CSS has no logs... I can't track that.I have 4 CSS610-8P out there at thi... | Are the missing pings new with 2.18, and fixed by downgrade to 2.17? (warning: can't downgrade lower than 2.17 without losing config because of changed config file format - sadly still not hashing the login password, so let's hope for another incompatible change soon).Over a month has passed and still no fix to that 2.... | A few months have passed - any news about a new bugfix release of SwOS Lite?I'm still running 2.17 everywhere because of the syntax errors in the hosts table on 2.18.Has the SwOS Lite development been outsourced, or has the last employee working on it already left?Put the source on github already :)Most of the value is... | #[SUP-161444] reported 2024-08-06 - still no response | Most of the value is in the hardware anyway, few companies make outdoor reverse-PoE switches.Your device is a dumb power consuming nothing without SwOS. So don't talk BS. And Mikrotik won't open source SwOS anyways. It wouldn't help you either way, as bugs are not fixed by just the action of publishing the source code.... | Without SwOS it would probably be an unmanaged reverse-PoE switch (assuming the switch chip has some sane power-up defaults), limited (no VLANs etc.) but still somewhat useful. Before the netpower lite 7R there were chinese reverse-PoE switch boards but I coulnd't find them nicely packaged in an outdoor case which is w... | Any news in support ticket ? | Still no news, running SwOS lite 2.17 on all my netpower lite 7r switches for now as it works for me, my theory (just a guess, pure speculation) is that SwOS Lite development is outsourced and MT has to pay for each new release, or have difficulty to find a contractor who wants to work on this code (perhaps it's so hai... | Update:We have managed to reproduce the issue locally in our labs and look forward to fixing it on upcoming SwOS lite versions, unfortunately, I cannot provide a release date now.Fingers crossed...Still it would be very welcome to see a refresh of these switches - the switch chip is good, just add a better CPU and memo... | I was just about to buy a couple of CSS610-8G-2S+IN (plus SFP+ modules) and came here to see what this "Lite" version of SwitchOS is all about. I already wondered how well it's maintained, given that there are only2-3 productsrunning it. Unfortunately, my concern was justified - more than eight months and no fix yet? I... | I had the switch just stop passing traffic for 5 minutes.It suddenly started working again.I messaged Mikrotik about it... But can't send logs, as there are none.A month later I got a message that they had reproduced the lock up. I was sent a firmware that addresses the lock up. But not the hosts table. I installed it ... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113370 | Thread-1113370 | RouterOS | Hi there, Today i've got my MT cAP ac (model: RBcAPGi-5acD2nD) and upgraded to the latest RouterOS and Firmware (today's release 6.45.3) but reading/spending a whole day on MT forum just to figure out why WiFi and Ethernet has absolutely terrible performance i decided to write my down my 1 day experience with MT cAP ac... | 6 | i've run the bandwidth test (Tools > Bandwidth Test) and used the details from the Bandwidth test forum, and turns out the unit caps at 30 mbps (2.7MB/sec)This tool is pretty old, and is known to be able to saturate CPU on its own. If you want to test the routing performance never test from/to device, always test throu... | I have two cAP ac at home. They have become unstable when I have chamged power supply from 24V do 13.8V buffer power power supply. They require voltage 17-57 VDC!! It took me quite long getting pissed of, because my pc was disconnecting randomly. It didn't look as power supply problem, RB didn't reboot, didn't log anyt... | You should always set country and installation / distance to indoor to ensure the channel configuration matches what the client device is allowed to use. Out of the box, MT devices need quite a bit of configuring to get to a usable state - disable legacy protocols, enable WMM, etc. | What did you expect ??? Taking the thing out of the box, refusing to set the regulatory domain and country code and antenna gain, and then hoping everything will max out???Setting SSID is quite easy. Only you didn't know the application interface. Nothing fancy there.You must set regulatory domain/country and antenna g... | I've had simmilar problem.I've just changed channel and bandwith, like @bpwl said - it helped a lot! Thank you! | i like reading that kind of stories. The tragic hero, IT professional with decades of experience in rocket science IT. First time has to do Mikrotik and fails hard because of that Latvian vodoo. Then visits Mikrotik user forum to vent. The end.Basically the boilerplate for many topics here. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113378 | Thread-1113378 | RouterOS | Hello all, I am in the middle of migrating my Cisco 10G Network to a Mikrotik 100 G. Actually I got less than a 3.5G of network traffic, 2 OSPF neigborhs (IPv4 / IPv4) and some SVI on the switch. Routing table has about 436 routes.Yesterday night, I tried to replace the Cisco Layer 3 Switch to CRS510-8XS-2XQ-IN, but im... | 11 | CRS devices are essentially switches ... as in L2 devices. Yes, running ROS on them does add L3 (routing), but without careful configuration those functions will be done by (slow) CPU.But: there's L3HW offload and it might work for you. Further reading:https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/spaces/R ... Offloading | Hello mkx, I tried activating the L3HW using the following commands:Switch Configuration/interface/ethernet/switch set 0 l3-hw-offloading=yesSwitch Port Configuration/interface/ethernet/switch/port set sfp-sfpplus1 l3-hw-offloading=yesBut it didn't have a positive impact on the cpu uitilization. | Hello mkx, I tried activating the L3HW using the following commands:Switch Configuration/interface/ethernet/switch set 0 l3-hw-offloading=yesSwitch Port Configuration/interface/ethernet/switch/port set sfp-sfpplus1 l3-hw-offloading=yesBut it didn't have a positive impact on the cpu uitilization.You have to enable it on... | Hello sirbryan, Exactly I enabled the L3HW over all active ports ( just only 4 ports). And the SVI and bridge config it's exactly as you describe it.Regards, | Are the MTU's on all the interfaces the same.The switch might fragment packets in software.My CRS305 does that... | any Firewall rules or VRF configured? | Hello rplant.The mtu values as default, do you suggest any other value?Regards, | Hello jookraw, No filter rules configured.I thought that the switch would be able to handle my traffic but seems like not. | Post your config (sanitized) and one of us can possibly point to what's happening. | Perhaps try the following commands to see if L3 offload is not present somewhere.With 400+ routes, you might want to write it to a file, so you can examine it in a text editor or similar./ip routeprint [file=somefilename]
```
Flags:D-DYNAMIC;A-ACTIVE;c-CONNECT,o-OSPF,d-DHCP;H-HW-OFFLOADEDColumns:DST-ADDRESS,GATEWAY,DIS... | One other thoughtIf you have an interface that is not part of the bridge, but has an IP address on it, it will route using hw offload.However if you have a vlan on this interface with an IP address on it, the vlan will use the CPU. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113392 | Thread-1113392 | RouterOS | HelloI am using Debian 12. My Mikrotik devices are AX2 and CRS326 with RouterOS version 7.15.1 I recently purchased YubiKey. I generated an asymmetric key ed25519 with FIDO2 support:ssh-keygen -f ~/.ssh/mikrotikAX2Yubi -t ed25519-sk -b 521I copied it to the router and tried to import it in system>users>SSH Keys. Unfort... | 2 | Hi, i'm running 7.16.2 on a CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS and i get an error when i try to import a ed25519-sk key. Unfortunately i assume they just have not implemented it (yet).I'd love to see this functionality. | It is not a bug. ed25519-sk is just not supported. Only recently the have added ed25519 support. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113410 | Thread-1113410 | RouterOS | Hello everyoneUpdated to 7.16.2Got a big bunch of Big Problems. After adding static routes for my WG tunnels, all my WG tunnels fall off. HAP Model AC2 | 4 | Well ... and the question is? | Has anyone encountered this? So what should I do? I'm not a great expert in these matters. Got into big trouble. I don't know what to do. | Well, you set the first step.Can you show your config, so we can have a look at your current settings?
```
/exportfile=anynameyoulikeRun above command from a terminal, after executing there will be a file.Copy the content, remove serial and any other private info and post here between code tags by using the </> button.... | Well ... and the question is?That was my first reaction too when I approved that postOPpost your config as requested, provide a bit more detail on how things fit in the larger picture and we can work from there. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113411 | Thread-1113411 | RouterOS | Ive just got SXT LTE Kit. Standard setup works absolutely great. But the main router (RB3011) needs the LTE WAN address in my setup so Ive tried using passthrough mode and it works to a point but I cant actually get any working internet over the interface.Ive setup SXT on my LAN by using DHCP client on the SXT bridge w... | 15 | Which RouterOS version do you have on both devices ?I have a WAP LTE Kit connected to an OPNSense firewall, which lost internet access after upgrading to RoS 6.43. After that, i did a downgrade back to 6.42.7 and the connection was back online.I think this change in 6.43 caused or is related to the issue:*) lte - use "... | Better print here diagram and export your config with hiding sensitive info. | Well spotted about the /32 addressing.I just noticed that 6.44beta6 was out and guess what is in the release notes:lte - fixed DHCP relay packet forwarding when in passthrough mode;Will test and report back. | Doesnt work with 6.44beta6 or 6.42.7 or 6.43Heres my export:[admin@SXT-LTE] > export# sep/12/2018 23:51:56 by RouterOS 6.42.7# software id = CF7Q-26RP## model = RBSXTR# serial number = XXXXXXXXXXXXXX/interface bridgeadd admin-mac=B8:69:F4:01:2F:47 auto-mac=no comment=defconf name=bridge/interface eoipadd mac-address=02... | Just wanted to ping this as Im still know where on with this.The setup is real simple. SXT-LTE and RB3011 on same /24 subnet. SXT-LTE on .4 and RB3011 on .1. There is EoIP tunnel between the two with the tunnel interface selected as the passthrough interface on the SXT-LTE APN. DHCP client sat on the corresponding EoIP... | Yeah I'm not sure, I'm no expert, but your config looks right...but passthrough is pretty weird, too. You can try setting the MAC address in the APN, that might help, but not sure. Whenever I've tried to do something, other than assign passthrough to a physical port, it never "just" worked - but setting the MAC address... | I got passthrough working on a brand new setup. LHG-LTE6 with Audience. I set it up as ether1 passthrough and a vlan for management. Worked first time.Tried the same setup on the SXT-LTE + RB3011 and still no traffic flow but DHCP received the WAN address as before. So scratching head. I happened to have a new hAPac2 s... | Just revisiting this as I have an office wanting a 4G connection. They have RB3011 with very basic config - no joy getting it to work. Been trying all sorts with my own RB3011 - no joy. ** BRIDGING DOES NOT WORK WITH RB3011 ** and I suspect others too! The strangest thing is that when you torch the port on the router (... | For administration, you tried using a loopback interface?Regards. | Just revisiting this as I have an office wanting a 4G connection. They have RB3011 with very basic config - no joy getting it to work. Been trying all sorts with my own RB3011 - no joy. ** BRIDGING DOES NOT WORK WITH RB3011 ** and I suspect others too! The strangest thing is that when you torch the port on the router (... | Ok interesting - you are using the vlan for the wan passthrough not ether1 itself? Im sure I tried this combination and it didnt work. I will try...About LTE firmware Im on R11e-LTE6_V027 (I updated my R11e card in SXT-R) the SXT is currently on 6.49beta44, Ive tried all versions. I guess I could roll back to same as y... | RB3011 is just netinstalled on 6.47.9 for you...Try to do the same... | I managed to get hold of CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+. Works first time with my standard config on the SXT-LTE6 which is ether1 as passthrough port, and vlan hanging off that for management!Next I will try to default the RB3011 and try again. | Further info on this.The problem seems to be when you have LTE passthorugh as a second WAN. Ive tested on several devices now and when you have a LTE or DHCP or PPPOE primary wan (distance=1) and then add an LTE connection as backup (distance=2) then it doesnt work, no traffic flows.Even using /tool ping to say 8.8.8.8... | I konw this is an old post but just for the record, setting passthrough mode as p2p in apn setting under lte interface menu, might solve this problem. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113412 | Thread-1113412 | RouterOS | Hi, When selecting "interface activity" for say ether1, if you have a VLAN interface it doesn't show activity for the VLAN interface.Is there a way around this ? | 7 | Actually it does show ... it shows all traffic, passing a physical port (tagged or untagged).If you are not seeing the same way, then explain actual topology and setup so we can see if there's misunderstanding or a possible bug. And what exactly you're observing, it could be I'm referring to something completely differ... | Actually it does show ... it shows all traffic, passing a physical port (tagged or untagged).If you are not seeing the same way, then explain actual topology and setup so we can see if there's misunderstanding or a possible bug. And what exactly you're observing, it could be I'm referring to something completely differ... | I am talking about the front LEDs yeah ?Ah, right.It could be that leds functionality refers to L3 interface (when configured so). And that excludes tagged traffic. You may want to open a ticket withsupport@mikrotik.comand have them clarify (and update/ammend help page as well). | I am talking about the front LEDs yeah ?Ah, right.It could be that leds functionality refers to L3 interface (when configured so). And that excludes tagged traffic. You may want to open a ticket withsupport@mikrotik.comand have them clarify (and update/ammend help page as well).Will do | Any update on this? I noticed that the LEDs on my CRS326-24G-2S+ do not blink when there is traffic but just jointly every couple of seconds. I use vlans as well. They also do not blink on
```
/interface/ethernet/blink ether01. They are all set to "interface-activity".
---
``` | Any update on this? I noticed that the LEDs on my CRS326-24G-2S+ do not blink when there is traffic but just jointly every couple of seconds. I use vlans as well. They also do not blink on
```
/interface/ethernet/blink ether01. They are all set to "interface-activity".So I opened the ticket and yes, the lights will res... | Thank you for the quick reply. Showing vlan activity of course will show the same pattern on all ports of the vlan, but to me it is more useful than before. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113439 | Thread-1113439 | RouterOS | Hello Guys, I have questions, how do I pass all traffic into WireGuard Cloudflare VPN?I follow this tutorialhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pFcVRaoscE, but when I add mangle or routing rule, my winbox disconnects from the router and cannot connect via IP.In that tutorial, the wireguard traffic is only for a specific r... | 49 | # model = RB941-2nD# serial number = #/interface bridgeadd admin-mac=# auto-mac=no comment=defconf \ingress-filtering=no name=bridge port-cost-mode=short vlan-filtering=yes/interface wirelessset [ find default-name=wlan1 ] band=2ghz-b/g/n channel-width=20/40mhz-XX \country=indonesia distance=indoors frequency=auto inst... | I'm following your configuration, but i got ERR:Could not connect, MacConnection syn timeout. Why ?And why i should make new home vlan and add it on bridge ?Now i cant get access to my router board, with Mac address on all port or ip | The config was not intended for you to blindly copy and get into trouble, it was there to generate questions and discussions.Until you understand what I touched upon and answered the ambiguities and questions, there is no point in changing any of the config.In terms of making changes to the config on any MT device I hi... | My router RB941-2ND only has 4 ports.- ether 1 > wan 1- ether 2 > wan 2- ether 3, 4 > bonding to a TP-Link switch.because you say when I'm trying to try config, I need one port dedicated to 'offBridge' / debugging purposes. Then I chose port 4, and because of it, I should unbound ports 3 and 4.==== ====here is the new ... | On accessing the router by IP address....... do you mean using winbox, I always use macaddress for the very simple reason its easier and available and just need to click on it.If I use IP address I have to actually physically type in the IP address and remember also the winbox port ( one of the first things I do is cha... | As for the TP link switch is configured incorrectly but you left out some of the other TP link config screens to confirm either way???The single or bonded ports on the router/interface bridge portsadd bridge=bridge ingress-filtering=yes frame-types=admit-only-vlan-tagged interface=ether3( or bonding1 ) is correct its a... | On accessing the router by IP address....... do you mean using winbox, I always use macaddress for the very simple reason its easier and available and just need to click on it.If I use IP address I have to actually physically type in the IP address and remember also the winbox port ( one of the first things I do is cha... | As for the TP link switch is configured incorrectly but you left out some of the other TP link config screens to confirm either way???I'm sorry, the switch that I use only one, and I need adjustable for the new config. Here is the new config for the switch. Is that correct ?tplink switch, vlan1 should be remain untagge... | Okay, I think I understand.All LAN traffic will go through VPN.VPN will use WAN1.If WAN1 goes down, you want only HOME users to be able to access WAN2 during this time.Please confirm that WAN2 traffic should also go out VPN for internet and not directly WAN2 to www.On the TPLINK Switch1. VLANID1 is NOT a member of port... | Your bridge diagram doesnt seem quite correct yet...However the config it came from would have been better to view./export file=anynameyouwish (minus router serial number, any public WANIP information, keys etc..)The IOT devices should not be a problem. The VPN should move to WAN2 in case of failover...... | This is correct until you add back in etherport 4, but lets get the rest of the config up and working first, all vlans, and wireguard working, then worry about bringing ether4 and lag/bond back up!!!/interface bridge portsadd bridge=bridge ingress-filtering=yes frame-types=admit-only-vlan-tagged interface=ether3/interf... | Okay, I think I understand.All LAN traffic will go through VPN.VPN will use WAN1.If WAN1 goes down, you want only HOME users to be able to access WAN2 during this time.Please confirm that WAN2 traffic should also go out VPN for internet and not directly WAN2 to www.Yes that's right, VPN also use in WAN2.On the TPLINK S... | Here is the new Mikrotik configuration.
```
# 2024-10-30 00:44:50 by RouterOS 7.16.1
# software id = #
#
# model = RB941-2nD
# serial number = #
/interface bridge
add admin-mac=# auto-mac=no comment=defconf \
ingress-filtering=no name=bridge port-cost-mode=short vlan-filtering=yes
/interface wireless
set [ find def... | Assuming cloudflare wireguard provided endpoint address endpoint port and private key and used the private key provided when creating the Mikrotik wireguard instance correct?Also did they provide any DNS information to use??yes I'm using thishttps://github.com/ViRb3/wgcfto generate cloudflare VPN warp connection for wi... | Changes onlyBY the way your bridge ports were not adjusted, if you dont apply recommended changes we cannot progress, and note that taking ether4 off the bridge means NOT having it as bridge port!Also removed ref to powerline, your router doesnt have an extra powerline connection that I am aware of......... how do you ... | Changes onlyBY the way your bridge ports were not adjusted, if you dont apply recommended changes we cannot progress, and note that taking ether4 off the bridge means NOT having it as bridge port!Also removed ref to powerline, your router doesnt have an extra powerline connection that I am aware of......... how do you ... | The good news is that you still can access the router ( hopefully via ether4 ) as you can provide a config.Yes Sorry it should be four rules.add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat in-interface=home-vlan10 dst-port=53protocol=udpto-address=172.16.0.1add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat in-interface=home-vlan22 dst-port=53protocol=u... | 1. Why are all your bridge ports disabled??? only ether4 should be disabled ( for now ) in any case cleaned up all.......Why is ether2 on the bridge at all, its one of the WAN ports right?Ether3 is a trunk port going to the TPLINK switch, it has no PVID.Lets fix it....../interface bridge portadd bridge=bridge ingress-f... | How does the usb micro port show up as a selectable option on the r outer???If it does then yes by all means add it back to /interface bridge ports and bridge vlansI don't know, it just shows on default/factory configuration, but the micro usb port only for power, not data, I think so.add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat in... | Yes for the nth time get rid of this rule.add action=drop chain=forward comment=\"defconf: drop all from WAN not DSTNATed" connection-nat-state=!dstnat \connection-state=new disabled=yes in-interface-list=WANOther than that not sure why its not working. | Yes for the nth time get rid of this rule.add action=drop chain=forward comment=\"defconf: drop all from WAN not DSTNATed" connection-nat-state=!dstnat \connection-state=newdisabled=yesin-interface-list=WANI already disable that rules, mean same as remove it right ?Other than that not sure why its not working.Hmm, I'm ... | I just realized that the Nat firewall is provided wrong IP address of wireguard, the IP address that assigned to wireguard interface is 172.16.0.2, so I change from 172.16.0.1 to 172.16.0.2, now my internet connection work, and no notification "no internet connection" on my devices.But still I can't connect to my route... | Post your latest config and please explain a bit more clearly what is NOT working yet . | Post your latest config and please explain a bit more clearly what is NOT working yet .Before that, I want to say thank you for helping and guiding me to understand the Mikrotik configurationFirst, I can surf into internet, but some websites like this forum can't be loaded.mikrotik wireguard, some website cannot be acc... | 1. Confirm when you are surfing the net, the source is the home router IP??? aka through wireguard!!1.Confirm cannot connect via winboxa. using wifi connectionb. using ethernet4if you changed the winbox port from default then you need to put in IPaddress:port#I always use mac address.2. Change these to reflect the IP a... | Also, what do you mean you cannot ping the subnets..........Ping from where???So the major changes are dstnat rules IP address is the remote address 172.16.0.1and the IP DNS settings are simplyadd server=1.1.1.1, 1.0.0.1Once we get everything working THEN we will do the failover changes!!! | 1. Confirm when you are surfing the net, the source is the home router IP??? aka through wireguard!!Yes, the client device's laptop/phone is connected to a Mikrotik router that uses wireguard.1.Confirm cannot connect via winboxa. using wifi connectionb. using ethernet4Using ethernet4 is normal.But using wifi or etherne... | Please post the current config for review. | Please post the current config for review.Here is the new configuration.
```
# 2024-11-03 03:27:47 by RouterOS 7.16.1
# software id = #
#
# model = RB941-2nD
# serial number = #
/interface bridge
add admin-mac=# auto-mac=no comment=defconf \
ingress-filtering=no name=bridge port-cost-mode=short vlan-filtering=yes
/... | Since ether4 works, suspect the switch may be the culprit.Reviewing the latest config.... | Since ether4 works, suspect the switch may be the culprit.Nope, the switch is not a problem. I try directly connect my laptop to the router via ether3, I set ether3 pvid=10 admit=all, still I can't ping / connect my winbox into router via IP address.Reviewing the latest config....Any idea ? | The only thing that proves is that you cannot hook up a dumb device (laptop) and get traffic from a trunk port..........Ether3 is going to the switch and thus cannot be terminated on a laptop.Sure you may have changed the /interface bridge port settings, but did you change the /interface bridge vlan setting as well???/... | The only thing that proves is that you cannot hook up a dumb device (laptop) and get traffic from a trunk port..........Ether3 is going to the switch and thus cannot be terminated on a laptop.Sure you may have changed the /interface bridge port settings, but did you change the /interface bridge vlan setting as well???/... | Lost as you are............Going back to basics.Have you ever had a WIREGUARD connection ........ ??Not that this will make a difference but modify/ip routeadd check-gateway=ping comment=Recursive disabled=no distance=1 dst-address=\0.0.0.0/0 gateway=9.9.9.9 routing-table=main scope=10 \suppress-hw-offload=no target-sc... | Lost as you are............Going back to basics.Where should I start?Have you ever had a WIREGUARD connection ........ ??I never heard wireguard until Mikrotik announced a new feature, so I excited what new, I read I found wireguard connection is a new VPN protocol connection, but for a few years I've been using Cloudf... | At this point, probably insert a chip into my brain and sever anytime I spend working on configs.........Probably get up on discord and skype and use teamviewer or something to look at config and try things live.What time zone you in?? | At this point, probably insert a chip into my brain and sever anytime I spend working on configs.........Probably get up on discord and skype and use teamviewer or something to look at config and try things live.What time zone you in??Hehe I'm sorry for thatMaybe discord i think ?I'm in Indonesia TimeZone Jakarta (GMT+... | Yikes, going to bed soon but will figure out when I am available and then I can give you some contact info........ | Just post here when you are around and I will watch out for it and respond if available. | Its 9:31pm your time, you there........? | Okay another one to try........ Its testing if the min prefix is stopping outgoing wan from router itself traffic,,,,very weird......We think the min=-prefix command, not well understood may be getting in the way.Try this simple fix and see! We are adding another rule, as last rule so no need to frig with rule order./r... | Just post here when you are around and I will watch out for it and respond if available.Yeah, I'm sorry I'm late, maybe what time will you be around here? I will prepare for that | Okay another one to try........ Its testing if the min prefix is stopping outgoing wan from router itself traffic,,,,very weird......We think the min=-prefix command, not well understood may be getting in the way.Try this simple fix and see! We are adding another rule, as last rule so no need to frig with rule order./r... | Thanks for the updates........ still thinking....... | The newest export posted here is more than two weeks old. If you still haven't resolved it, please post a current one. | The newest export posted here is more than two weeks old. If you still haven't resolved it, please post a current one.Yeah still not working.- I can't ping to default gateway and winbox can't access router via IP address.- Sometimes Website can't be opened- Even my router sometimes after a few days get error I can't co... | - I can't ping to default gateway and winbox can't access router via IP address.Here, by "default gateway" you mean the one from the point of view of the PC (or phone), i.e. the own address of the Mikrotik in the subnet from which the client has got its address via DHCP?- Sometimes Website can't be openedfrom the same ... | - I can't ping to default gateway and winbox can't access router via IP address.Here, by "default gateway" you mean the one from the point of view of the PC (or phone), i.e. the own address of the Mikrotik in the subnet from which the client has got its address via DHCP?Yeah, if example my client device connect into vl... | So time zones play little role and it is basically a random process, OK.If you want to give it a try, follow the instructions inthis post. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113441 | Thread-1113441 | RouterOS | Hello, I recently just checked the logs on one of our devices and it looks like the logs are showing public IP entries as the gateway IP.I've tried to find out more about this but I'm unsure what's happening. Is there a way to change it so that it shows their Public IP instead of the gateway?Attached is the screenshot ... | 4 | From the logging I get the feeling that SSH is publically available. Why?Is this MikroTik behind NAT? As the IP address it is showing is a private IP? Cam you supply a network diagram including IP addressing in it? | This kind of looks like what you would get, if your gateway was also a Mikrotik, and it had hairpin nat enabled for a SSH port forward/dst-nat connection to the internal router. (With attempted logins from inside) | Or maybe someone or something is somehow logged into or has a vpn into your gateway router, working on the next step. | This kind of looks like what you would get, if your gateway was also a Mikrotik, and it had hairpin nat enabled for a SSH port forward/dst-nat connection to the internal router. (With attempted logins from inside)Or even from the outside if that src-nat rule doesn't care. But indeed, some endpoint security softwares pe... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113447 | Thread-1113447 | RouterOS | Hello, I would like to block traffic to internet from my Reolink camera. At first I wanted to build a separate vlan etc... but for now I think just blocking access to internet seem sufficient and I still don't know how to do that.I tried to add the following rule to drop everything to give it a try :
```
/ip firewall f... | 5 | Yes, drop by mac address doesn't work at the router stage.You could connect only the Reolink to a specific ethernet port on the router, and block based on port.You could give the Reolink a static lease from the DHCP server, and block based on IP address.(From winbox, go to ip dhcp server, the leases, select the Reolink... | Yes, drop by mac address doesn't work at the router stage.Not exactly true. If the router can see the
```
src-macon the packet, then it will match it fine. The problem can be if the packet is L3 forwarded from somewhere else (but that is not the case here) or if it was already allowed in another rule. I use mac matchin... | Works fine on my RB5009 (tested with my Internet radio) but your problem probably is the position of the rule in the forward chain!Move it up!You can always temporary enable logging and check the output. | Thanks a lot for your great replies !I tried to put the rule on top of everything but nothing happenedI should maybe do something about VLAN for now I use the default config for most of the stuff ...not great especially with IOT sharing the space of my servers/computers I will try to make something this afternoon
```
F... | >> For me this should prevent everyconnection, but I still can access the video so ... it's not workingHow do access the video-feed ? Are you using app on your smartphone on the local WIFI-network ? Are you testing externally with your phone on 4G/5G?Is the REOLINK cabled directly into the Mikrotik ?Please provide some... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113458 | Thread-1113458 | RouterOS | Hello everyone, I wanted to share a guide on setting up a WireGuard VPN connection toNordVPNon a Mikrotik router runningRouterOS v7.x. While NordVPN provides instructions for setting up an IKEv2/IPSec VPN connection—which works fine—you need to usemangleto route specific destinations, and you cannot implement a kill sw... | 4 | Just to add that in some cases, you might need the router to adjust the TCP MSS, if TCP connections get stuck./ip firewall mangleadd action=change-mss chain=forward comment="Clamp MSS to PMTU" new-mss=clamp-to-pmtu out-interface=wg-nordvpn \protocol=tcp tcp-flags=syn | There are two options, the one that was stated as well as:add action=change-mss chain=forward new-mss=1380 out-interface=wg-nordvpn protocol=tcp tcp-flags=syn tcp-mss=1381-65535 | So, for my use case, I only want one device 10.10.15.x/32 to use nordlynx, but I want to be able to access that device from anywhere in the network. As I have it now, I was able to whitelist 10.10.15.0/24, 10.10.10.0/24, etc. Is this possible doing it through routeros? | The easiest way to provide access to a third party wireguard service is via WIFI.Simply make a virtual WLAN just for internet access to nord.........If you have the option one can dedicate a vlan and ensure those needing access at their desks, have a managed switch next to the PC ( old hexes are great for this ) and th... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113492 | Thread-1113492 | RouterOS | Hi guys, We have a monitoring center which has 2 critical IP addresses (one primary and one secondary) which sit on independent CCR 1036 routers as firewalls etc.What i need help with is we want to make these IP addresses resilient across multiple totally separate third party connections. We have a main supplier on eac... | 7 | Not a very clear story.So you have ISP1 , which delivers 1 public IP using L2TP terminated onto a CCRYou have ISP2, that delivers also 1 public IP using L2TP terminated onto a CCRSo is ISP1 providing you with the primary FTTH link and ISP2 with similar FTTH-link ?If the above assumptions are correct, you will never be ... | if you have low latency paths you could use public ips through a hosting. establish a tunnel from isp1 to the hosting. create another tunnel from isp2 to the hosting. assign yourself a public ip from the hosting through the tunnels, you could use ospf to assign it dynamically using the best path. | I am not sure I understand properly what you want to achieve. From what you wrote I gather that those addresses are assigned to your provider by the authority responsible for address allocation in your area, i.e. you do not have any public prefix and a public ASN number assigned directly to you, so the only portion of ... | Hi all, We have a supplier who is providing us a public IP address over an L2TP tunnel. This is the critical IP address. We can authenticate this tunnel over any of the WAN connections that we have.Our primary firewall has multiple (3) independent connections. Currently if the primary fttp connection fails our tunnel w... | To minimize the total time of the outage, you must minimize both the detection time and the time needed for the actual failover. The faster you make a conclusion that the current connection is down, the sooner you can initiate the actual failover, but the higher the probability that you react too soon because only few ... | Thanks for the response, this is exactly the type of plan we are thinking.I will try my best to implement and let you know how we progress. | @jack, What i need help with is we want to make these IP addresses resilient across multiple totally separate third party connections. We have a main supplier on each IP which currently is supplying us an L2TP tunnel type connection for this IP address on each firewall however I want to make this move across the backup... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113493 | Thread-1113493 | RouterOS | Hi guys, i am not sure, but i think i have seen this working - but for now it is not:Add a queue with 570M for Up- and Downstream on a simple bridge setup:
```
# 2023-09-01 15:55:06 by RouterOS 7.11.1# software id = **ELIDED**## model = RB760iGS# serial number = **ELIDED**/interfacebridgeaddadd-dhcp-option82=yes dhcp-s... | 9 | frist of all:only 2 cores, 2 aditional executing threads are virtual, SMT, Like Hyper-Threading on Intel | Second: experience goes that when looking at official test results (published on official product pages), the single number which represents real-life performance the best, is under "routing -> 25 ip filter rules -> 512 byte packet size" (with decently high error margin). For hEX S the number is 385Mbps and that number... | Thank you for your hints on that.If i use the bridge to bridge all ports and go to Switch > Ports and do some testings on INGRESS / EGRESS settings. If i set EGRESS to 270M, Download is about 256M, so this is perfect. But on the INGRESS when i set 270M i only get 12M on the client on Upload.Is the switch chip not capab... | AFAIK ingress rate control can only work somehow smoothly if flow control is active (the alternative is to drop frames and packet loss absolutely kills TCP performance). However, flow control on MT devices is sometimes iffy ... | I would like to specify, this is a feature of the switch chip, so it has limitations, limiting bandwidth It's not as simple as we sometimes think | The thing is: egress bandwidth limiting is always easy, one only needs Tx buffer and then it's as simple as adding appropriate delay between transmissions of subsequent frames/packets. Ingress limiting is hard ... the other party delivers frame whenever it sees fit and the only "smooth" way of telling the other party t... | packet loss absolutely kills TCP performanceFor ingress, you'd want to use a queue that sends ECN, which the switch chip does not. fq_codel would do this in a simple queue. However, this would consume more CPU, than blunt dropping of switch chip. But that would likely get your speedtest results more even/higher, since ... | With bridge-ipfilter yes and simple queues on 6.44.x i am able to do 520M / 520M.When updating firmware to 7.16.3 it is not possible anymore.at 260 MBit/s CPU1 is going to 99% usage.But this only apply for streams from sfp1 to ether1. Queue sticks to CPU1.The reversepath ether1 to sfp1 works. All 4 CPUs gets arround 48... | I think you're experiencing the "caching" effect. Do a search on the forums and you'll find lots about this. v6 had caching due to the kernel supporting it. At some point caching was removed from the Linux kernel. V7 runs on a newer kernel therefore it doesn't have caching. From what I've seen, if this is a real deal b... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113528 | Thread-1113528 | RouterOS | Hi guys!I'm having issue on a setup: I have a field machine that has a web server integrated in it. I have connected this machine to a SXT LTE6 to get it online, but thanks god Vodafone only gives me a private IP, hence my problem...I configured at my office a hAP ax3 with a public, but dynamic IP to be a WireGuard Ser... | 5 | Good news. Public IP on main router allows many things.a. remote road warrior or you as admin to access Main router via wireguardb. remote machine behind private IP can reach wireguard (using LTE as wireguard client router)+++++++++++++++++++++via the main routerc. admin while remote can reach both LTE for config and m... | Thanks for the quick answer!"or doesnt matter as long as it processes the request properly.If not, then we simply sourcenat all the traffic coming from port forwarding to the IP address of the WG at the main router and thats all the LTE will see coming in heading for the webserver.Fairly simple to do!!They key is a por... | Step back one.Remember port forwarding is based upon a destination port.So I use the public IP of the connection as the destination address and the dst port/protocol.When that arrives at the main router, the router looks at the NAT rules and sees a corresponding dstnat (port forwarding) rule, then verifies if such traf... | Hi Anav, Sorry of getting back so late...I read Your description, and it make logic to me, but I hope that my understanding was correct when I set up the following on my main router in addition to the previous:
```
addaction=accept chain=input dst-port=8081in-interface-list=WAN protocol=tcpaddaction=dst-nat chain=dstna... | @edepalos, So, right now:- I have my tunnel up and running;- I can ping from my machine the anything in my office LAN (PC and hAP ax3);- I can ping from any office PC the field LAN (machine and SXT LTE6);- I can access my office PC's web server from WAN by port forwarding it accordingly (XXXXXX.ns.mynetname.net:portnum... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113529 | Thread-1113529 | RouterOS | Hello, I’ve configured WireGuard on my MikroTik router (version 7.16), and it’s working correctly for one peer (Hamed-PC). This peer is able to connect, access the internet, and use the tunnel without any issues. However, for a second peer (Omid), the handshake is successfully established, but no traffic passes through... | 3 | Hi, I think that it's a common misunderstanding (I had to learn it myself) that the definition of "allowed-address" on the responder side allows any packets from the peer to the responder. This has to be done on the config on the client!I usually set* on the responder: allowed-address= to the client wg-address/32* on c... | Think about the logic. One should understand the function of allowed addresses:.On inbound, it checks if the remote source address coming in is on the list!On outbound, it checks in order of the rules as they appear, a. does the destination exist. and b. assign it to the right peer.The first peer has an allowed IP addr... | @hamed, Checked WireGuard logs for both the router and the Omid client.Pinged the Omid IP address (192.168.10.101) from the router but received no response.and what did those log and ping results say? | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113545 | Thread-1113545 | RouterOS | First of all here my settings* 2024-12-06 17:22:59 by RouterOS 7.16.2
```
# software id = XE51-3KWQ## model = CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS# serial number = xxxxxx/interfaceethernetset[finddefault-name=sfp-sfpplus2]arp=proxy-arp name="LAN "set[finddefault-name=ether1]name=MNGset[finddefault-name=sfp-sfpplus1]name=WAN/interfacewir... | 3 | hello,
```
/ip firewall nataddaction=masquerade chain=srcnatthat masquerade option needs output interface parameters (ie. wan internet). otherwise any communication won't work correctly.
---
``` | Hi, thanks for replying!What do you mean sorry? That rule is what makes me possible to connect to the internet.What do I have to modify? As for now everything work perfectly aside this damned adlist | hello,
```
/ip firewall nataddaction=masquerade chain=srcnatthat masquerade option needs output interface parameters (ie. wan internet). otherwise any communication won't work correctly.Man, I am literally on the verge of crying, thanks.I informed myself more and pointed the nat rule only to my wan interface. Well, now... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113571 | Thread-1113571 | RouterOS | I'm configuring capsman, I would like to ensure that when the user moves between the various cAPs the connection does not drop but roaming occurs. Does the configuration seem correct to you?
```
/interfacewifi channeladdband=2ghz-ax disabled=nofrequency=2412name=channel1 skip-dfs-channels=disabled width=20/40mhzaddband... | 5 | At first sight it looks ok.Have you tested it when moving around ?You should see roaming messages in log file. | As the complete bandwidth of 2.4GHz radio is 40MHz wide, I would advise to use bandwidth=20mhz. Roaming works better when you use non overlapping channels.Don't use vlan id=1, instead use something above 1.Don't set antenna-gain to 0, leave it default or set correctly.Missing country, which makes it think/assume it is ... | Thanks for the advice, I'll do some field testing next week | As the complete bandwidth of 2.4GHz radio is 40MHz wide....Not exactly true. WiFi 2.4GHz band extends from 2401MHz (lower boundary of channel 1) to 2473MHz (upper boundary of channel 11, relevant in NA) or 2483MHz (upper boundary of channel 13, relevant in EU and almost everywhere else than NA). Which gives 72MHz or 82... | I've done some tests and it seems everything works perfectly. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113592 | Thread-1113592 | RouterOS | Hello, I tried searching the forums for someone with similar problem but couldn't find anyone that came up with a solution.So we have Mikrotik RB1100AHx4 that is on v6.49.2 and we have OVPN set up on it. We also have IPsec tunnel to one of our clients locations set up.So everything worked fine until month and a half ag... | 1 | hi, i'm experiencing this problem too, anyone have the solution?i'm using CCR2004 and Router OS version 7.12.2 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113600 | Thread-1113600 | RouterOS | Hello.Is there any way to set the DUID of the IPv6 dhcp-client for requesting a prefix. Online.net predefines a DUID, which has to be used by the client...Thanks, Peter | 5 | Hi Peter, Same problem here.I found this post regarding your question :viewtopic.php?f=2&t=120801&p=593966&hilit=duid#p607902I was running vmware so I could change the interface mac-address and check that the DUID also changed.It didn't solve the problem : I still don't get an IPv6 address.Did you make some progress on... | Ah - this makes sense (my guess about Comcast in the other thread appears to have been wrong).It's interesting to see how so many different ISPs do so many different things with their IPv6 rollouts. It's going to be nice a few years down the road once the industry settles into standards like it has with IPv4.Hopefully ... | Yeah, and it's quite discouraging to see how long changes like this (which seem to be really minor adjustments) can take to reach the RC…I'm still waiting for what seems to be a simple switch change :viewtopic.php?f=14&t=122446&p=620492#p606682 | I know this is an old thread, but i really need to set the DUID of the dhcp client of mikrotik.The use case is when you change the router, the provider changes the prefix it gives you. | DUID's were same for two different internet uplinks and cannot be changed. I had two internet connection and as the DUID same, I was not getting address or prefix from the ISP. But now there's an entry "Use Interface DUID" so when I click that, I got two different ipv6 prefixes from verizon. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113623 | Thread-1113623 | RouterOS | Hello everyone, I need your help. I am connecting two different ISP WAN connections to my MikroTik device, and my goal is to separate them based on LAN ports. For example, I want to use ISP1 when connected to port 1 and ISP2 when connected to port 2. I have prepared a configuration for this, but it's not working stably... | 3 | In your configuration, LAN-1 to LAN-22 are not IP interfaces, they are just member ports of their respective bridges. If you look at the packet and byte counters of those mangle rules, you'll see that they stand at 0 because from the point of view of the IP firewall, there is no traffic that would matchin-interface=LAN... | Very confusing nomenclature, There is no need to change etherport names, but if you must then at least have etherport3 name=LAN-3, and so forth.I would not have thought of using bridges for grouping traffic like you have.Now that its clear you are doing port forwarding, the mangle rules get more complex and I would now... | Keeping with the routing rule theme sindy suggested..It would look like no mangling and the following routing rules....TRY THIS FIRST as its much easier./routing ruleadd action=lookup-only-in-table min-prefix=0 table=mainadd action=lookup-only-in-table src-address=10.0.2.0/24 table=ISP1add action=lookup-only-in-table s... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113636 | Thread-1113636 | RouterOS | I'm trying to come up with the best way to hand out IP addresses in my WISP network.I've attached a diagram of part of my network, with a Radius server attached.Would something like this work, such that the client routers could obtain an IP address from the Radius server?John | 7 | If you configure each of these routers 10.1.1.254, 10.2.1.254 etc with some "helper" address (on the customer-facing side) to relay the broadcast-request they see coming in the client-side and deliver it in unicast to your DHCP you'll have no issue to map it to a correct pool I guess.So you are handing out 10.x.y.z IP'... | Need to clarify a couple of pointsThe radius server simply authenticates it doesn't know or care if the IPs being used are public or private.If you are going to dish out private IP's then you will have a source nat or masquerade from that range to the WAN IP.The ip pool for the hand out can be in a mikrotik pool or in ... | +1 with @ldb @jvanhamWould something like this work, such that the client routers could obtain an IP address from the Radius server?radius (nas server) only handles AAA (users and password, mac addresses etc - as defined in attributes) requested by routers (nas clients) . it needs to work with dhcp server for ip addres... | I've got this working - mostly.Here's the configuration that I now have set up:WISP-Network_Rayfield_RADIUS-Test_12-05-2024.pdfThe Client Router gets an IP address from the RADIUS server.But, after a few seconds, I get the following error in the MikroTik log:"Detected conflict by ARP response for 10.1.1.201 from A8:6E:... | You could look at the first three bytes of the mac address, to see that mac address is from TP-Link deviceIf that's any clue for you ??https://maclookup.app/macaddress/a86e84 ... ss-detailsMaybe some one have put a TP-Link router into your network, that also answer to your clients dhcp requests. | I know what device it is. It's one that I put on the network to test the RADIUS server and DHCP.The problem is in regards to these error messages. I can't figure out why I'm getting them.John | Can it be that the dhcp authoritative is not set or set to invalid value.https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/spaces/R ... Properties | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113646 | Thread-1113646 | RouterOS | Hi folks, I'm trying to figure out how to rework my network since I now have the luxury of having multiple cheap (<35 USD per month!) 10Gbps FTTH connections to my home.In my current setup, I have a CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+PC that sits in a rack in my home office alongside all my other homelab gear. The ISP modem(s) terminate... | 4 | hello, your home lab diagram looks goodThe way I've been using VLAN's so far is that they would be tagged to the ports in the Bridge to allow inter-VLAN routing:yes. that's correct. also there are many ways in doing vlan setup in mikrotik which you can tweak to your requirements. mt wiki.as for dedicated vlans for wan ... | Yup each WAN incoming to the switch1 (in room1 ) is an access port to a different vlan.Then trunk port carrying both vlans and any other vlans that need to go to room1, are added to this trunk heading to switch 2At switch 2, trunk to the router carrying both WAN vlans, any vlans from Room1 and Any vlans from room2.Thes... | Unless for some reason you are using dual fiber one for trunk of wans and other trunk for ROOM1 vlans and ROOM2 vlans, That also works and is probably better. So basically into one port on the router are all VLANs, in the other trunk port from switch2, are simply the two vlans for WAN.I will think about whether I want ... | The vlans for the wans are created on the router, but do not require any subnet information.They are terminated on either IPDHCP client settings, or pppoe settings or even straight address on the router.The nice thing about splitting the rest of the vlans on a different port is you dont have the mess of bringing them a... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113660 | Thread-1113660 | RouterOS | Hi, is there a way to increase the Font size in winbox? I recently bought a new laptop and it uses a higher resolution the text looks really small and if I increase the text size in Windows to 150% the text looks fuzzy. | 27 | bump...This is much needed especially on Hi-DPI displays used at native resolution.--jeroen | It works fine on HiDP displays if you use correct resolution (what the laptop manufacture suggests) and scaling settings in Windows (should be 100% where all looks best. but if it looks small, increasing this should not make it fuzzy).Maybe you use an external display? Windows gets confused when the other display is no... | i did reduce the resolution on the work laptop, to eliminate windows scaling fuzziness problems. (and that is not only winbox, that is an issue for many programs. | It doesn't work fine when you use the Hi DPI displays to just have a lot of pixels. Which means no scaling and is a perfectly "correct resolution" (maybe not what "the laptop manufacture suggests", but a lot of companies suggest things that in practice work better when you do differently).WinBox for for instance also f... | I don't agree. Macbook retina shows everything perfectly. Nothing should be small, the OS should do scaling by taking screen size into consideration, which seems is not the case in some Windows versions.Screenshot from MacBook with Retina:Screenshot 2016-05-12 14.02.45.png | A screenshot on MacBook with Retina at 2880x1800 (see below) doesn't tell you much.A photograph does:The screenshot lures you into thinking it is readable until you realise this is at 220dpi:http://dpi.lv/#2880×1800@15.4″ | Looks great to me. Font size consistent with System Preferences and other UI. | Looks great to me. Font size consistent with System Preferences and other UI.That's why it's not great. Most applications I use can be configured individually on font size to use. Andthat's also what vdelarenal75 asked for:Hi, is there a way to increase the Font size in winbox?I understand that you guys are reluctant t... | OK, correction, it's not "fine", but it is the same as the rest of your system. | OK, correction, it's not "fine", but it is the same as the rest of your system.That isn't true either. Compare Atom IO text editor on the left and WinBox on the right.I could make this picture on Windows as well (there is an Atom IO for Windows).Put it in an extreme way: even Notepad on Windows can set the font size.As... | Hello!It's really need to improve WinBox compatibility with Windows scaling feature. For example, I'm using a 4K display with 4096x2160 resolution and 31.5" screen size and interface looks ugly when Windows scaling is not equal to 100%. But it's impossible to use Windows without scaling on such displays because everyth... | I don't agree. Macbook retina shows everything perfectly. Nothing should be small, the OS should do scaling by taking screen size into consideration, which seems is not the case in some Windows versions.You are not quite corect while blaming Windows here and in other topics (like this one:viewtopic.php?t=85365).Windows... | Are there any news on this case?I think we are not the only winbox-users, that are using 4k Displays.Best RegardsFlorian | here is my problem with 4K monitor. How to fix ? | Hello, I have exactly the same problem 4K monitor has a lot of people today and it is only 2019. Please correct it for your applications, thanks | Hello, Someone found a solution for crappy fonts?I'ts a native Windows application, and it doesn't look correctly...Linux and wine... it's terrible.Shame on you MikroTik | So hard is using a magnify tool to this? (Software obviously, not a real one).Regards. | Mikrotik DEVS!!! Fix scaling for 4K users! We hate you! | Mikrotik DEVS!!! Fix scaling for 4K users! We hate you!You check the new WinBox 3.21 ? | How you dare to discuss something with Mikrotik devs???? Everything they do is perfect!! /sStop this shitshow please, Mikrotik is going down the sink hole | I found a solution for this. Execute wine regedit.exeBrowse to HKEY_CURRENT_CONFIG \ Software \ FontsDouble click LogPixelsChange to DecimalIncrease from 96 to 128, 144 (or larger)In another terminal, execute wine winbox.exeThe fonts should be biggerIf the menu fonts are small, execute gedit ~/.wine/drive_c/windows/win... | @secret, Your Wine reg tweak was very helpful.Thanks ! | Hi,@normis:Is it possible to increase font sizc in winbox, the existing 5 levels of zoom in /settins/zoom are not enough on a hi-dpi display - the fonts are still too small on a hiDpi display.Thanks! | Hi,@normis:Is it possible to increase font sizc in winbox, the existing 5 levels of zoom in /settins/zoom are not enough on a hi-dpi display - the fonts are still too small on a hiDpi display.Thanks!I agree. Font size is a problem. Also winbox does not respond to scaling changes (windows display settings, scaling) like... | New WinBox around the corner. I guess the current WinBox won't see/get a fix. | New WinBox around the corner. I guess the current WinBox won't see/get a fix.No need to guess, their support already says that they won't fix anything in WinBox 3, if it's not "critical".New WinBox in a beta and not even ready yet, many people don't even like it. But they already dropped support of v3. It's craziness..... | The code in Winbox3 is so old, that it is impossible to fix a lot of issues in there. It's the biggest reason why Winbox4 exists, so we can start improving it. We did not make Winbox4 just to annoy you with new color schemes. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113661 | Thread-1113661 | RouterOS | MorningI have a CCR2216 on ROS 7.16.2When I upgraded from 7.16.1 to 7.16.2 my OSPF sessions was not working. I disabled L3 HW offloading and OSPF came up again.After a few days I turned L3HW offloading on again and last night my OSPF sessions between edge and other routers was down again. If I look at the log there is ... | 1 | Plese do not duplicate yourselfviewtopic.php?p=1113653#p1113653 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113681 | Thread-1113681 | RouterOS | H All, At our main site, we have a 500 Mbps link to our ISP. An issue arises when our on-prem server runs a backup sync to the cloud, which saturates the link. This leads to the ISP policing our traffic and dropping packets. These dropped packets affect call quality for other sites using the CUCM servers hosted at the ... | 7 | As a start, I would be inclined to just put a single cake queue attached to the WAN interface, to see how well (or not) it works.(With no packet marking for shaping)Set it up for 500M, and a bucket size of 0.005-0.01, (or your settings) and see how it goes.You will need to create a new queue type using the cake base ty... | Thanks for your reply @rplantI just had a look at the CAKE documentationhere(i hadnt heard or configured it before), it looks like the feature is only available in version 7?The following queue kinds CoDel, FQ-Codel, andCAKEavailable since RouterOS version 7.1beta3. | Sorry, I should read things a bit more thoroughly.Unfortunately, the 3011 seems to not be great under v7.Perhaps what you have will be good.Though I do not understand why you have a limit of 100M on the backup traffic.You will likely need to add all the packet marks to the parent (WAN-Shaper) so it gets them all.Presum... | One other thought,(Somewhat more like my original thought)You could perhaps make a new pcq type queue, based on pcq-upload-default, but with a 24 mask.(So everything from 10.0.1.x will be counted together)Then back to no marking, and fast track allowed.The low rate lans will be prioritised over the high rate (busy) lan... | Though I do not understand why you have a limit of 100M on the backup traffic.100M was just an arbitrary number that i was going to play around with.Also i was a little confused byyou could perhaps make a new pcq type queue, based on pcq-upload-default, but with a 24 mask.(So everything from 10.0.1.x will be counted to... | I was thinking of something like./queue typeadd kind=pcq name=pcq-upload-24 pcq-classifier=src-address pcq-dst-address-mask=24 pcq-src-address-mask=24It just groups each /24 lan subnet together so the large upload machines get lumped together.On testing, you may find the pcq-upload-default works better for you.At this ... | Thanks @rplantI will try that and see how it goes. Thanks again! | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113732 | Thread-1113732 | RouterOS | We have a CCR2116 router connecting to a pair of CRS510-8XS-2XQ switches (for dual connected servers) and a CRS317 switch.The CCR router has the L3 interfaces of the VLAN defined, the CRS510 and 317 have VLANs assigned to ports on a bridge.What is the best practice around enabling HW offloading at the chipset?Should we... | 2 | https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ ... ureSupportshould answer some of your questions.Unless you plan to use VRF, MLAG, VXLAN or Q-in-Q then your CRS switches should be able to offload L3 aswell - otherwise they will just offload L2.In your case if you have defined L3 interfaces on your CCR router (that is the hos... | Any plan from @mikrotik if and when to support VXLAN HW-Offloading. Without it a l3 Fabric based on 100G+VXLAN+OSPF just doesn't too much sense? Does anybody have data on how fast VXLAN through the CPU can go?Thx, Mischa | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113776 | Thread-1113776 | RouterOS | UPDATEAfter further reading, it seems to me that what I have found is an issue with certain PXE clients and not Mikrotik's DHCP server implementation. Marking an end code with "FF" is done according to spec as perRFC 2132 section 3.2and my proposed workaround might cause problems, as every option is properly formatted ... | 8 | As this is a user forum, you should post this tosupport@mikrotik.com | Referring to my first post:I will forward this post to Mikrotik support, but I want to make it public for everyone, so if someone is facing similar issue, they will be able to apply my workaround.Also, I provided an update at the top of my post. If someone more experienced than myself has proposal for a workaround that... | FF = DHCP Option 255 (End). You don't need null-termination because the DHCP options are prefixed with their length.
```
Option:(67)BootfilenameLength:14Bootfilename:grubnetx64.efiOption:(255)EndOptionEnd:255Padding:00000000If you do want to null-terminate the string - the workaround can be simplified to this:
```
```... | I browsedavailable optionsand '72 HTTP server' seemed pretty harmless. But after adding it to Option Set, there is no change in packet structure - option 67 containing bootfile name is the last one and option 72 is not passed.According to the standard, a DHCP server only provides the options the client has requested. S... | According to the standard, a DHCP server only provides the options the client has requested. So if the client did ask for 67 but did not ask for 72, there's no wonder that the server did not send it despite being defined.Right, thank you for clarification. Now that you mention it, it is quite obvious.FF = DHCP Option 2... | You could try force=yes on dhcp option 72?https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/spaces/R ... POptions.1According to the DHCP protocol, a parameter is returned to the DHCP client only if it requests this parameter, specifying the respective code in the DHCP request Parameter-List (code 55) attribute. If the code is not include... | My concern with this workaround is that when you append this null character to the filename, it's going to change the length and might confuse some PXE clients ("pxelinux.0" has lenght "10", but with null added it's going to be 11 (hex 1A) and I assume some clients might not like it).It seems that MT DHCP server curren... | Yup, I think I will call it a day. According to my testing:* When null-byte is appended to the string, every system mentioned in first post boots properly.* When option 72 is added/forced, mkx assumption was almost spot on. I performed the testing on H97N-WiFi since it displays the filename it attempts to load. Seems l... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113783 | Thread-1113783 | RouterOS | My router has a total of three ISP exits. I tried using ISP1 and ISP2 as ECMP routing tables and allowed some devices within the local network to use this ECMP routing table outgoing gateway. The other devices use the default main outgoing gateway.However, the problem is that after I set everything up, this specific de... | 28 | Your configuration export doesn't show any reason why 10.0.0.130 should use routing tablemain, however, as of current (7.16.x), there are issues with handling of themin-prefixvalue in configuration. So unless you have added the first routing rule already with that value specified, add the same rule before (above) it us... | 1. Your pool isadd name=dhcp ranges=10.0.0.150-10.0.0.240Why is any device getting a LANIP of .130 ????2. Routes look messed u ( or maybe I dont understand how to apply ecmp )Should be...... at least for Version 7.Assumes ecmp is the primary and a few need to go out pppoe8 ( Edit, now I realize thats backwards see next... | Wow... it did not come to my mind to look that low into your config.Bothpppoe-out1andpppoe-out2are attached tomacvlaninterfaces, which in turn are attached toether5, andether5is disabled (at least in the export you have posted). Disablingether5means that all traffic, not only IP one, that would physically pass through ... | I'm not sure purpose behind using the intermediate macvlan in the first place...Also, you cannot just add a route to routing table unless same route exists in the main routing table, which may be first order problem in OP's approach. | I'm not sure purpose behind using the intermediate macvlan in the first place...It may be necessary to use a different MAC address for each PPPoE client connecting to the same ISP using the same physical interface, and macvlan is one of few ways to ensure this. I haven't tested yet, though, whether it actually works.yo... | Re macvlan, it might be useful in some cases... but adds more complexity if it's not actually needed was my point.you cannot just add a route to routing table unless same route exists in the main routing tableCan you elaborate on why should doing so be a problem?The docs onPolicy Routinghave one of the callouts that sa... | the main routing table should be able to resolve the destination too.Yup, but a default route inmainis sufficient to meet this requirement. | Your configuration export doesn't show any reason why 10.0.0.130 should use routing table main, however, as of current (7.16.x), there are issues with handling of the min-prefix value in configuration.Actually, my intention is only to let the device with IP 10.0.0.130 use the ecmp outgoing, while other devices use the ... | No worries, if macvlan works and is appropriate for your ISP setup.Fix the the routing rule and see what happens.Post config again after changes.Note the only change on routes is I added recursive but not necessary.also no need to make main route have distance anything but the default of 1. | Both pppoe-out1 and pppoe-out2 are attached to macvlan interfacesYou are right, because I need to dial the same interface twice.That's OK, I've even tested that if the pppoe interface is attached to a macvlan, the pppoe-discover frames are indeed sent via the physical interface with the source MAC address of the macvla... | You are right, because I need to dial the same interface twice.That's OK, I've even tested that if the pppoe interface is attached to a macvlan, the pppoe-discover frames are indeed sent via the physical interface with the source MAC address of the macvlan one, so all good here. But I have missed that ether5 was in fac... | I'm not sure if it's affected by other configurations, but for policy routing, I only have the one strategy that we have discussed so far.This remark makes me cautious, but I assume you haven't removed any mangle rules from the export before posting it? I cannot imagine anything else to have an impact.And I would like ... | publish latest config/export file=anynameyouwish ( minus router serial number, any public WANIP information, keys etc. )Full config not what you think we need to see............ | This remark makes me cautious, but I assume you haven't removed any mangle rules from the export before posting it? I cannot imagine anything else to have an impact.publish latest configmy last configuration, I have only deleted a large number of/ip dhcp-server lease.
```
# 2024-12-08 16:11:04 by RouterOS 7.16.2
# soft... | So you did filter out some of the configuration previously, but it was indeed unrelated, OK.First I would change theactionin the only routing rule fromlookuptolookup-only-in-tableand remove themin-prefixcompletely (but usingremoveandadd, for the reason explained before). If that changes nothing about the behavior, it m... | I tested again with a restored factory configured ax3 router and when I tried to configure one of the following two rules, neither could hit the ecmp routing table and all traffic went through the main table.
```
/routing rule
add action=lookup min-prefix=0 src-address=192.168.88.0/24 table=ecmp
/routing rule
add acti... | First I would change the action in the only routing rule from lookup to lookup-only-in-table and remove the min-prefix completelyAs you said on ax3, when I deleted all the routing rules and did not usemin-prefix, ecmp took effect immediately, but it also prevented me from logging into winbox again.Because I usedsrc-add... | I'd remove it and try to use a mangle rule instead to achieve the same effect.I have a question, now it seems that ecmp is already working.When I use routing rules for routing, will it be more CPU resource-saving than using mangle? Because when I used mangle with pcc before, if the PT client was downloading, the speed ... | So it was a configuration after all. Whatmin-prefixactually does is that it takes a look which route in the indicated table would be used for the packet, and if the length of thedst-addressprefix of that route is smaller than or equal to themin-prefixvalue, the rule returns a non-match so the packet processing commence... | For anyone later that follows this thread;;;;;;;In this case since there is only one subnet and the prefix rule is basically doing the equivalent to:/routiing ruleadd action=lookup-only-in-table src-address=192.168.88.0/24 dst-address=192.168.88.0/24 table=mainThe value in using the min-prefix=0 is that it allows any l... | Sorry @anav, but your wording is so advanced that it is confusing even for me, although I know what you actually intended to say.So let me try myself in a simpler language with more details: In most cases, we need to prevent the traffic towards local destinations from using other routing table thanmain. Until recently,... | Better with recursive checking of connectivity/ip routeadd dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 gateway=pppoe-out8 routing-table=main comment="Primary WAN3"add check-gateway=ping dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 gateway=1.1.1.1 routing-table=ecmp scope=10 target-scope=12 comment=ISP1add check-gateway=ping dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 gateway=9.9.9.9 r... | Slow down, manLeaving aside that the topic title has become totally misleading already long ago, and that you have changed the objective all of a sudden, your bold rules are either incomplete or incorrect.The whole idea of using the recursive next-hop search to monitor route transparency is to prevent the router from s... | Also its nice to tells us different requirements, but if you dont post the most update config, we have no idea where things are at.Thus everytime you make changes post the new config/export file=anynameyouwish ( minus router serial number, any public WANIP information, keys etc..)Also state all the requirements (the wh... | @sindy @anavFirst of all, thank you very much for your help.I am in the process of refining my configuration, when I will post a new topic and describe my configuration and my corresponding needs.I hope I can get your guidance to make my configuration more robust. | @Amm0, Yup, but a default route inmainis sufficient to meet this requirement.Also, I'm pretty sure that statement in the documentation is a simplification the author has used to avoid the need to explain that this requirement (for some route to exist inmain) is only related to own outgoing traffic of the router, which ... | @Amm0, Yup, but a default route inmainis sufficient to meet this requirement.Also, I'm pretty sure that statement in the documentation is a simplification the author has used to avoid the need to explain that this requirement (for some route to exist inmain) is only related to own outgoing traffic of the router, which ... | Interesting, ECMP sure is much less complex in terms of sharing the load in case one of the WANs is not available.In load balancing, it can turn into a huge nightmare of extra mangles and routes.I am not convinced your recursive is correct I would do it this way.dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 gateway=ca.na.ry.8 distance=1 check... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113809 | Thread-1113809 | RouterOS | Hello dear Friends !Ac2 had ros 7.16.1 only.No other packages !Free space was approx 1.8 mb.Due to global power on\off cycles it s been reset somehow.I have a 1 week old bin backup, size approx 1 mb, which seems to be a salvation.But its not ...Many times I tried to restore bin backup - no luck.It boots up with empty c... | 5 | I've just loaded (restored) a backup saved on a hAP ac² running 7.16.1 on a CHR running 7.16.2 that I have cloned for the purpose and equipped it with 5 Ethernet interfaces. To my surprise,/exportshows even the configuration of the wifi interfaces that do not exist on the CHR. For even better results than I've got, bef... | I'm having the same problem with my AC2 | "The same" including the fact that your enchanted configuration contained a huge amount of address list items and that's the only part that got restored? | So if it fails on you, the reason why the backup load on the hAP ac² itself fails in your case is that the contents of the backup file is corrupt.Thank you.You are right.I found a bit older binary backup (even larger size), and succesfully managed to recover with no problems to 7.16.2 | HI, For this main reason about the ridiculous 16MB flash, i avoid theses.And for backup config, i always theses two commands and after, trough scp, i get theses files :[*] /system/backup/save dont-encrypt=yes name=xxx.backup[*] /export show-sensitive file=xxx.rscThis allow with the .backup to restore easily to the same... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113830 | Thread-1113830 | RouterOS | System: RB5009 with desktop at 2, 5Gbps at ether1, and SFP XPon (at 2, 5Gbps) at the SFP+ interface.Problem: In order to prevent dropped packages, I set a 949 Mbps limit on the 1Gbps ports and SFP+ egress rate, on the switch menu. Local network works like a charm. Targets on the internet up to about 130ms, work very we... | 6 | @patemot, any rate-limit will always produce latency. we just need to adapt or to fine tune it to an acceptable rate. latency could happen anywhere along the path.Now the weird part: The degradation ONLY happens if the eth1 is running at 2, 5Gbps. If I set it to 1Gbps the problem goes away.have you disable that 949mb r... | I don't mind the (very small) induced latency. My problem is the reverse: when the connection have a higher latency (I'm in Brazil, the Japan server is about 270ms away from me) the uplink sees a significant reduction on speed, when using QoS. EVEN if the speed limit is bigger than the link speed. And the worse the lat... | the uplink sees a significant reduction on speed, when using QoS. EVEN if the speed limit is bigger than the link speed.I'm sorry, can you be more specific about that qos type you have implemented? wred? have you classify your traffic?you said uplink. did you mean you shaped the outgoing to internet?And the worse the l... | I tried everything, to no avail.Yes, I shaped the outgoing link - the download one was fine. My ISP has about zero of bufferbloat, no need to mess about it.But I think I made a mistake: I think my problem is the TCP window size on my desktop. I started debugging the problem as a QoS (or lack thereof) because it appeare... | it's nice to hear you have solved your qos problem. greatno offense, but I hardly see the relationship between your original question description and your solution?tcp window size? smaller size to bigger one makes latency smaller. greatand what happened to that ether1 port? | As I promised, here is what happened so far.Router: RB5009Internet: FTTH, XPON (module DFP-34X-2C2)Desktop: Ryzen 5600, with mainboard Asus TUF B550M-Plus (2, 5 Gbps Realtek 8125), plugged on RB5009 eth1Second computer: Ryzen 5600, mainboard Asus TUF B450M-PRO II (1 Gbps Realtek 8111), plugged on RB5009 eth2After chang... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113831 | Thread-1113831 | RouterOS | I'm not sure if WAN access is expected to work out of the box with back to home? I cannot browse the web on my iPhone when connected via back to home.I see one other topic with a similar problem:viewtopic.php?t=207891But i'm not sure i see the solution to the problem in that thread, maybe i just don't understand the an... | 6 | The only thing I can suggest is a shot in the dark but its the only idea I have.add a firewall address list manually/ip firewall address-listadd IPaddress-peer1 list=back-to-home-lan-restricted-peersadd IPaddress-peer2 list=back-to-home-lan-restricted-peersHowever I do not know what that looks like to actually construc... | Thank you for your suggestion - I tried it it, but it didn't help.I was lucky to get closer to the issue. The wireguard peer2 (which is set dynamically) defaults to having a client DNS address as 192.168.216.1. That can be configured in the iOS app, and when it is changed to 8.8.8.8 i can browse WAN again... But if i s... | Okay here is the way.On your router make a firewall address list like so/ip firewall address-listadd 192.168.216.2 list=BTH-to-WANadd 192.168.216.3 list=BTH-to-WAN....add 192.168.216.XX list=BTH-to-WAN/ip firewalladd chain=forward action=accept src-address-list=BTH-to-WAN out-interface-list=WAN | Hmm, not 100% without more inspection.... But I think 192.168.216.0/24 needs to be in the "allowed_to_router" list. | Hmm, not 100% without more inspection.... But I think 192.168.216.0/24 needs to be in the "allowed_to_router" list.That would be for remote user access to the config of the router, I thought he was asking for access to the LAN subnets...... | Hmm, not 100% without more inspection.... But I think 192.168.216.0/24 needs to be in the "allowed_to_router" list.That would be for remote user access to the config of the router, I thought he was asking for access to the LAN subnets......Now that I look, correct. But I read the OP as internet bound traffic. I still t... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113853 | Thread-1113853 | RouterOS | Part of our monitoring is to log and alert of OSPF state changes. At the moment only the transition 'to DOWN' is logged as a 'route, ospf, info' message but anything else i.e. "state changed from Loading to Full" is in the 'route, ospf, debug' logging categoryThis means I can't generate messages showing an OSPF neighbo... | 9 | Indeed, this would be very useful but it's currently missing, even from version 6.45 (long-term) and 6.46 (stable).In the meanwhile, have you found any workaround to get the state changes ? | Yep..i have the same problem..i wonder why nobody answers something.. | Since MikroTik still hasn't implemented 'state changed from Down to Up' i've written a script to simulate it in the meantime. It isn't perfect but it does the job. It relies on running as a script so it doesn't notify you immediatelyAnd messages show up under the 'script, info' category not 'route, ospf, info' so if yo... | I should make a follow up post, hence I amI've had to disable this script across out entire network. There's a bug somewhere and I can't find out what it is. For the most part this script works just fine, however occasionally for some reason the script just keeps on firing and reporting an 'up' status, even though no c... | Bumping this up. MikroTik please implement this in the next firmware update. It should be an incredibly simple and easy thing to do, the messages are already there, just literally take the 'up' message (and all other key state changes) and assign it into the 'ospf, info' category. Very simple, 30 minutes if that | I've gone over my script (and i'd appreciate if someone else could) and I really can't find an issue at all, hence I think its a bug with the mikrotik neighbor output. Maybe its throwing an error/invalid entries and not updating the global value hence it always appears different, refiring the 'up' notificationI have mo... | Has there been any further progress on this script development?Going to try and implement this on a section of my network.Rick | No updates but I'm appalled mikrotik still has done nothing about this. Its a 5 minute task on a Friday afternoon job, literally just move the classification of specific OSPF messages into the correct category, doneI guess it's a chicken and egg scenario, which comes first?No one seems to care because no one uses the l... | @millenium7, superhowever occasionally for some reason the script just keeps on firing and reporting an 'up' status, even though no change in neighbors at alldiagnosis, 1. if the neighbors they were really in down state without any notice - then your part of the script is in correct behavior.2. do last time stamp check... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113854 | Thread-1113854 | RouterOS | I have RouterOS 3.17 and would like to be able to issue a "/ip hotspot user print" command via ssh, authenticated with a key. This works fine:
```
$ ssh admin@microtik"/ip hotspot user print"Flags:X-disabled,D-dynamic# SERVER NAME ADDRESS PROFILE UPTIME0tester211WLANhot58m9s1usrWLAN-... | 10 | you can use the different parameters for the print command, like "print detailed, print terse, print brief" etc | you can use the different parameters for the print command, like "print detailed, print terse, print brief" etcPrint brief does what I want. Actually, print detailed is print detail.GreetingsMarc | HiI am having exactly the same problem, except that none of the print options seem to be of any use. I am trying to print out the wireless registration table, but the data that is most important to me, the uptime, gets cut off. Is there anyway to prevent that?regards, Jason | tryprint detailorprint stats | aha!"print stats" works. Its a bunch more text, but it does the trick.Just as a note, the "print detail" does not work, the output is still truncated.thanks! | There are a lot of options for the print command, just type print and "?":
```
[admin@router]/interfacewireless>printPrintvaluesofitem propertiesindifferent formats.advanced--Showsubsetofpropertiesindetailed form
append--as-value--basic--Showsubsetofpropertiesindetailed form
count-only--detail--Displaysdetailed informa... | I know this is 15 years old, but it was the first result for setting ssh terminal width and it doesn't actually answer the question. Let me explain what the problem is and give a bunch of example data so you can see what the problem is.On a BSD host in my network I ransudo hostname this-is-a-really-long-hostname-becaus... | [...]If I use thebriefoption, as suggested in this thread, I still don't get the HOST-NAME column. If I use thedetailoption, I get the full hostname, but now the output is in this multi-line stanza format that I have to parse. What I really want is the IP address and the hostname and nothing else. And I don't care abou... | Super helpful. We still don't know how to control the ssh line width. But in my case this worked for me:
```
ssh marmite@gw"/ip/dhcp/lease/print proplist=\"address,host-name\""When I restrict the output to only those 2 columns, even my very silly hostname wasn't too long.The last thing I have to chuckle at is the heade... | I had to make a meme about it. But seriously. Thank you. I'm all set for what I needed. I hope someone else gets some value from this thread.LOL. A bug report tosupport@mikrotik.comon the user+1000w not working might have been more productive- as I'm pretty sure the user+100w stuff is broken, or at least it does not do... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113862 | Thread-1113862 | RouterOS | (Posts split from Is there a SwOS version compatible with CRS304-4XG-IN? -viewtopic.php?t=212335)Hi alli have this exact same problem! Its my first time buying a Mikrotik device and i start regretting it (please prove me wrong!!)I just received this CRS304 10GB SWITCH (and i bought this exactly for that reason, using i... | 3 | I'm pretty sure that if you reset your CRS to defaults, it'll come out configured as "dumb switch" even when running ROS. The only item to be done after that is to adjust IP address if you don't like the one used by default. Shouldn't be too hard when using Webfig (just try to avoid Quickset - switch over to Webfig ...... | unfortunately, no, the out of the box config isnt working of rme.. | Post config and specify what you want to do.1 bridgeAll interfaces to bridgePossibly dhcp client to bridge or fixed ip.There is not much more to it.For configopen terminalexport file=anynameyouwishmove file to PCredact serial numberpost contents back here in between [code] [/code] quotes.PS splitting this thread ... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113927 | Thread-1113927 | RouterOS | Hello, I am hoping to get some help from VLAN experts. Please see the diagram below. So my goal is to set up a VLAN on the Mikrotik 4011 to separate my IPTV traffic that I am receiving from the ISP Router's ETH4 to ETH5 on the 4011 router. The traffic is currently coming in untagged to the 4011 router but it comes tagg... | 14 | hello, I'm sorry we can't see your diagram in detail. it's too small and blurry.so... the bottom line is you want to have a setup similar to voice vlan? from 4011 to 5009 using eoip over wireguard? | You may need to enable the RTSP firewall helper for the IPTV. But if your using Spainish Movistar IPTV... I believe there are some issues IGMP proxy that block that from working.Also EOIP with WG is going to reduce the MTU, so I'm not 100% sure the IPTV packet fit over the lower MTU....so that may be another issue. | hello, I'm sorry we can't see your diagram in detail. it's too small and blurry.so... the bottom line is you want to have a setup similar to voice vlan? from 4011 to 5009 using eoip over wireguard?Sorry about that. Please see below. Yes, that is correct. When use torch on the interface, I am noticing all kinds of traff... | You may need to enable the RTSP firewall helper for the IPTV. But if your using Spainish Movistar IPTV... I believe there are some issues IGMP proxy that block that from working.Also EOIP with WG is going to reduce the MTU, so I'm not 100% sure the IPTV packet fit over the lower MTU....so that may be another issue.Hell... | @skhmm... aaa... you want to relay the iptv from isp1 to isp2?
```
isp1/iptv eoip ---> router1 --- eoip/wg --- router2 eoip ---> isp2/iptv??it's doable - but I don't know what will the quality be as it will travel via encrypted Tunnel. and first, let us not discuss about firewall.there are options - but first let us kn... | Just seeing lots of devices on the interface with torch that should not be there at all, nothing to do with IPTV multicast.If IPTV of Makedonski Telekom is anything similar to same thing of Telekom Slovenije, then VLAN for IPTV is switched for many IPTV customers ... and you will be able to see some traffic of other se... | @skhmm... aaa... you want to relay the iptv from isp1 to isp2?
```
isp1/iptv eoip ---> router1 --- eoip/wg --- router2 eoip ---> isp2/iptv??it's doable - but I don't know what will the quality be as it will travel via encrypted Tunnel. and first, let us not discuss about firewall.there are options - but first let us kn... | Just seeing lots of devices on the interface with torch that should not be there at all, nothing to do with IPTV multicast.If IPTV of Makedonski Telekom is anything similar to same thing of Telekom Slovenije, then VLAN for IPTV is switched for many IPTV customers ... and you will be able to see some traffic of other se... | Can you set one of ISP router ports as trunk port? Routers, provided by Telekom Slovenije, have option to set each port as either "data", "IPTV" or "both" ... the later being trunk mode.This way you'll get IPTV already (natively) VLAN tagged (and internet probably untagged which is not a problem at all) ... and then yo... | Can you set one of ISP router ports as trunk port? This way you'll get IPTV already (natively) VLAN tagged (and internet probably untagged which is not a problem at all) ... and then you have to pass that VLAN via EOIP (over wireguard). No need to fuss with two ports towards ISP router. As long as both ends properly de... | @skaaa... I'm sorry i just realized that right part should go via internet.No need to fuss with two ports towards ISP router. As long as both ends properly deal with VLANs, your LAN devices (which are not supposed to see IPTV network) won't see that traffic.there you go... @mkx provided you with the details.hmm...1. ma... | @skaaa... I'm sorry i just realized that right part should go via internet.No need to fuss with two ports towards ISP router. As long as both ends properly deal with VLANs, your LAN devices (which are not supposed to see IPTV network) won't see that traffic.there you go... @mkx provided you with the details.hmm...1. ma... | @skThe diagram is correct and it works. I just need to separate the traffic on those eth ports from the rest of the network, like it is on the ISP router otherwise it bogs down the multicast traffic. I assume the best way to do this is a VLAN?ok. let's break it down nice and slowly.you said currently it is in working s... | @skThe diagram is correct and it works. I just need to separate the traffic on those eth ports from the rest of the network, like it is on the ISP router otherwise it bogs down the multicast traffic. I assume the best way to do this is a VLAN?ok. let's break it down nice and slowly.you said currently it is in working s... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113969 | Thread-1113969 | RouterOS | Hi all, I'm trying to mount a usbstick using NFS from rose to a linux client (ubuntu 24.04):on routeros:- formated usb1 using ext4
```
/disk/setusb1 nfs-sharing=yes[andreas@router-ddhome1]/disk>/disk/printFlags:B-BLOCK-DEVICE;M-MOUNTED;n-NFS-SHARINGColumns:SLOT,MODEL,SERIAL,INTERFACE,SIZE,FREE,FS,RAID-MASTER# SLOT ... | 6 | Anything in dmesg?If you create a file from the second ros and look at the uid of the file, does it show as 0? | Byexample from doc:nfs root directory should be content ofusb1, not root withusb1dir inside.mkdir /mnt/usb1mount -t nfs4 192.168.105.1:/ /mnt/usb1ls -l /mnt/usb1Edit: or not... (then it should not be possible to have multiple disks mounted over nfs)Did you try with
```
mount-t nfs4192.168.105.1:/usb1 /mnt/usb1?Also che... | Also check if files on disk are accessible in ROS and if TCP port 2049 is accessible from IP of device where mount is performed, from docs:NFS uses port TCP/2049. If the port is not available in disk print detail you will see the state stuck at nfs-state="mounting"Seems you nailed it - I got to the manpage forexportsan... | hi all, yes tried also:
```
root@testbox2:~#mount-t nfs4192.168.105.1:/usb1 /mnt/usb1
mount.nfs4:Operationnotpermittedfor192.168.105.1:/usb1 on /mnt/usb1
root@testbox2:~#nc-z-v192.168.105.12049Connectionto192.168.105.12049port[tcp/nfs]succeeded!disk on router doesn't show obvious errors.
```
```
[andreas@router-ddhom... | Try adding--verboseparam onmountcommand to see if any message appears that can be helpful for troubleshooting. Also try with adding-o sys=secparam tomountif error is related to security permissions, on most distributions this is default option. | hi all, I was testing from a VM running on my host and access the NFS Server using a host-NAT network. If i used a just routed client everything works fine.
```
root@debian:/home/user# mount -t nfs4 192.168.105.1:/usb1 /mnt/root@debian:/home/user# ls -l /mnt/total404-rw-r--r--1root root393183Dec623:49cert-manager.yaml.... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1113992 | Thread-1113992 | RouterOS | I have HEX RB750Gr3 running on RouterOS 7.16.2My setup is:Two WAN: PPPoE (ether1)+ DHCP client(ether2)I configured the PCC load balance and recursive failover.Everything is working fine, all LAN devices can use both WANs and failover. The only two things that are not working are: Routeros-tool-ping-- cannot ping any IP... | 22 | There are two distinct major issues - the routing of router's own outgoing traffic in general and the unique behavior of the Wireguard stack.The default route in tablemainis mandatory for the own traffic of the router to get sent due to the way how this locally originated traffic is treated. Any packet the router itsel... | As requested/export file=anynameyouwish ( remove router serial number, any public WANIP information, vpn keys etc.)Should be quick to fix once seen. | As asked here is the full config
```
# 2024-12-09 03:57:50 by RouterOS 7.16.2
# software id = QCAY-BVGA
#
# model = RB750Gr3
# serial number = Hgggggggg
/disk
set usb1 media-interface=none media-sharing=no
/interface bridge
add admin-mac=48:39:83:23B:50:E0 auto-mac=no comment=defconf name=bridge \
port-cost-mode=sh... | As the configuration without any default route in table main is not very typical, I'm not sure whether this explains why you say that PCC works without it and doesn't without, but: the essence of fastpath & fasttrack handling of packets is skipping of some stages of packet processing, one of which is mangling. So for a... | I'm so sorry but I have no clue what you said. I am new to routeros and don't know any of this.Can you please tell me what to change and what to add?. | OK, simple terms:/interface pppoe-client set [find] default-route-distance=10/ip route add gateway=8.8.8.8 distance=1 check-gateway=ping/ip route add gateway=1.1.1.1 distance=2 check-gateway=pingTo allow the Mikrotik itself to communicate, theremustbe routes in routing tablemain, there's no way to avoid that. But the "... | First of all, thank you so much. Everything seems to work as I intended.what worked for me:
```
/interface pppoe-client set [find] default-route-distance=10
/ip firewall filter set [find action=fasttrack-connection] connection-mark=no-markthese two changes worked for me. Wireguard is also working.I also want to explai... | 1. What is the use of these two routes?
```
/ip route add gateway=8.8.8.8 distance=1 check-gateway=ping
/ip route add gateway=1.1.1.1 distance=2 check-gateway=pingAs you took the effort to monitor the transparency of both uplinks using the recursive next-hop search for the routes you use for load distribution, it seeme... | I really appreciate your thorough reply. I learned something new today. You solved my issue in a day when the internet couldn't help me for weeks. | one more observation.after connection-mark=no-markfasttrack seems to be not working. CPU usage shoots up to 100% on high bandwidth utilization. whereas this was not the case previously. | Indeed, that's the price to pay for load distribution using mangle rules. By changing that toconnection-mark=!WAN2you can have 50 % of the traffic fasttracked, but you cannot fasttrack all connections.Instead of PCC mangle rules, you can use ECMP to distribute the LAN->internet traffic, as fasttracking skipsmanglerule ... | then why does fasttrack+pcc works when I remove default route? | That's what I do not understand because such a configuration is so unusual that I have never tested it. | is this limited to OS v7 or the same in v6 also? | I really appreciate your thorough reply. I learned something new today. You solved my issue in a day when the internet couldn't help me for weeks.sindy 1internet: 0Go, sindy, go! | make it @sindy 2 - @internet 0and a cup of coffeefor @sindy as well@trextom, have a readviewtopic.php?t=142401@mkx and beloved mt members have solid discussion about pcc and fasttrack | is this limited to OS v7 or the same in v6 also?If you mean the fact that most fasttracked packets skip mangle rules, that was the case ever since fasttracking has been introduced, if not in ROS 5 then in early ROS 6, as skipping part of packet processing steps is the very essence of fasttracking.If you mean that fastt... | and port forwarding is not working.update: fixed with the help of this thread.viewtopic.php?f=2&t=49581 | @trextom, and port forwarding is not working.update: fixed with the help of this thread. viewtopic.php?f=2&t=49581greatbut - no offense - which part of your problems has been fixed? pcc? fasttrack? port forwarding? | The thread fixed the issue with port forwarding. Previous posts fixed PCC and somewhat fasttrack. However, I'm still having an issue with fasttrack. | As always please post the full and most current config for review./export file=anynameyouwish ( minus router serial number, any public WANIP information, keys, long assed dhcp lease lists, unecessary and not used IPV6 crapola ) | edit- duplicate | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114009 | Thread-1114009 | RouterOS | Hello, not completely newbie .. but not master in mk.To test the adlist system, I created a network configuration with two virtual machines under virtualbox .The first is a MikroTik router (version 7.17rc2 ) and the second is a freshly installed Ubuntu Desktop.Current configuration:The MikroTik router receives an IP ad... | 2 | I don't see enabled setting "allow remote requests" in your router.make sure Ubuntu clears the DNS cache it might have in the system, also clear router DNS cachetry also these sites:https://d3ward.github.io/toolz/adblockhttps://adblock-tester.com | I don't see enabled setting "allow remote requests" in your router.Thanks ! Much better with !What a fool I am ! | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114013 | Thread-1114013 | RouterOS | I thought I had Port 25 blocked on my Mikrotik. I keep getting these in my logoutput: in:(unknown 0) out:ether1, proto TCP (SYN), 173.x.x.x:50383->185.64.106.147:25, len 60I redacted my Public IP.We are occasionally getting blacklisted. Have scanned our network and have found nothing. I am suspecting the Mikrotik is do... | 2 | You might want to post your config. By default, port 25 is allowed outbound.If your added rule to block outbound 25 is after an "accept", that could be the problem. | The log message clearly indicates that it is the Mikrotik itself that initiates the TCP connections to port 25 - it saysoutputwhich is the firewall chain that handles packets sent by the router itself, and it saysin:(unknown 0)which says the same in another way (packets sent by the router itself have noin-interfaceto b... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114014 | Thread-1114014 | RouterOS | Hi there, Has skins being deprecated in recent RouterOS? I am on 7.14.2 and uploading a skin via scp doesn't work, I can upload the json file to the root of the Mikrotik but no longer under /skins/ folder:
```
scp engineers.json admin@my-fw:/skins/engineers.json
scp:dest open"/skins/engineers.json":Unknownstatus
scp:fa... | 7 | Just create a new skin and compare/see where it gets stored. This should answer your question where to put the Json file correctly. | what hardware do you use? I used a routerboard with 7.14.2 just yesterday and the skin folder was present. In any case I would do as advised. log in from webfig and draw a skin and see where it is saved | In version 7.15 skins created are stored in flash/skins. I created a 'skins' directory outside the 'flash' directory and manually stored .json skin files there, problem solved. | Upgraded to 4.15.3 and now it recognizes the skins. However there is a catch.You can't upload them directly via SCP since it will fail, nor you can do the previous trick of setting an smb share with the skins folder name so it will create the folder then remove it.The only way I got it to work is to create another skin... | From what I’ve seen, creating a skin through WebFig first, then using that folder for your uploads, seems to be the workaround. I've also run into similar problems where SCP alone didn’t cut it.But if you’re into skins for other things like games, you might findskin.landhelpful. It’s where I go to buy and sell game ski... | From what I’ve seen, creating a skin through WebFig first, then using that folder for your uploads, seems to be the workaround. I've also run into similar problems where SCP alone didn’t cut it.That's the best advice: let webfig create it first.Especially if you have an older router, I'm not 100% upgrades actually upgr... | I had the same issue (sending skins to the router with scp), but it just seems the way to do it has changed....1/ scp is not the easiest way, better doing a fetch (any protocol) as it will create any missing subfolders in /file2/ it seems you then need to reboot so the new skin is available for /user group add3/ /user ... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114017 | Thread-1114017 | RouterOS | I'm trying to setup BTH, but it's quite unstable for some reason.It's behind NAT and there are ECMP routes - should it work this way ? | 6 | /export file=anynameyouwish (minus router serial number, any public WANIP information, keys etc. ) | Yeah config going to be needed here.One additional consideration, is if you have IPv6 enabled, BTH will use IPv6 if available. This may or may not be expected, so might want confirm in /ip/firewall/connections and/or /ipv6/firewall/connections to see... RouterOS comes with IPv6 enabled, but sometimes it's left unconfig... | yeah the first thing I do in every config is blow up capsman and obliterate IPV6. They are like parasites that drain my energy | yeah the first thing I do in every config is blow up capsman and obliterate IPV6. They are like parasites that drain my energyLOL, I know your thoughts there & BTH does use IPv6 - why I highlight that detail. Although I suspect OP running into the WG+multipath "issue"... | ipv6 is disabledI have two WAN connections from different ISPAnd if I add two default routes through them ( ECMP per se ) - BTH/wg doesn't work or very unstableBut if I leave only one route - all works fineSo I wonder if it's "expected" problem ? | For last time......viewtopic.php?t=213165#p1113997@AMMO see this thread for your thoughts..viewtopic.php?t=213177#p1113986 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114020 | Thread-1114020 | RouterOS | I use the CRS-317 switch as a transparent bridge with Spanning Tree set to 'none'. One of my clients uses their own RSTP configuration for redundancy, and their traffic, including STP packets, must be transmitted through this switch in a dedicated VLAN without any STP packet blocking/modifing etc.This setup worked flaw... | 9 | hello, I'm sorry I don't quite understand this partuse the CRS-317 switch as a transparent bridge. Spanning tree is set to "none," and one of my clients, through this switch, uses their own RSTP in a dedicated VLAN for redundancy.did you mean your client set their own vlan - and you let their vlan traversing your trans... | I'm sorry I don't quite understand this partLet’s make it simpler: I need RSTP packets to pass through without any processing/modifing/blocking. I need a fully transparent bridge. Previously, simply disabling STP by setting it to "none" allowed this to happen. But now, I can't manage to get RSTP packets to pass through... | What should I do? Roll back to ROS 7.15.3?it's definitely your callnext time - if i were you, i will definitely test drive first before live in production.if it is really important for you - try to reach the mt support. good luck | Hi, I wasn’t able to reproduce the same results in our lab. The forward-reserved-addresses=yes setting does forward all the reserved MACs 01:80:C2:00:00:0x, whether they are tagged or untagged.Maybe there is something else to blame here. Could you share your full export and clarify which switch ports and VLANs the BPDU... | Could you share your full export and clarify which switch ports and VLANs the BPDUs should be forwarded between?Thanks for your help.I have attached part of the exported config.RSTP blocked at 510, 511 vlan between sfp-sfpplus4 and sfp-sfpplus8. | Thanks.I was able to pass through tagged BPDUs with VLAN IDs 510, 511 using your configuration on CRS317 running 7.16.2.So I suspect one of these issues:1. sfp-sfpplus4, sfp-sfpplus8 do not even receive BPDUs.2. received BPDUs are untagged and does not get forwarded through CRS317 due to sfp-sfpplus4 and sfp-sfpplus8 b... | Try adding this rule and share the output of sniffer command:[/code]Everything looks correct on the incoming traffic to sfp-sfpplus4, but there is no outgoing RSTP on sfp-sfpplus8 (sfp-sfpplus4 0.386 1 <- 02:95:88:05:73:54 01:80:C2:00:00:00 10 802.2 64 1sfp-sfpplus4 0.386 2 <- 02:95:88:05:73:54 01:80:C2:00:00:00 7 802.... | Sniffer will not show outgoing traffic when using HW offloaded bridge, it is expected behavior.If you really want to check whether tagged BPDU packets are being sent from the sfp-sfpplus8 interface, you need to perform packet capture on the device at the other end of the link. Based on my tests, the packets should be o... | The issue has been resolved; it turned out to be a coincidence. There's no problem. Thank you, everyone. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114021 | Thread-1114021 | RouterOS | Good evening, Mikrotik Team and Community.I would like to kindly ask the Mikrotik Community to vote for a following feature in the android app.Please add the ability to arrange a bookmarks on the main app screen - right below the CPU/Mem and above 'Other settings'.These bookmarks can lead to any existing page for examp... | 11 | That would be a useful feature | Thank You, 4 voters.I appreciate Your opinion. | No. | A missing option: Huh? | Please note the missing options here, thanks. | Thanks to all voters | What? You dont want a stilted design based on absolutely no HFE and MMI lessons learned, how impetuous. | What? You dont want a stilted design based on absolutely no HFE and MMI lessons learned, how impetuous.I do not blame anybody, I understand that this whole ecosystem is for people who rule in the black scary terminals, so do I.Mikrotik Support told me that they will implement this feature if they will receive more simi... | Thank You, 12 voters. I hope Mikrotik Team will hear our voices. | Please vote! | Good evening, people. I am going to submit this feature request to Mikrotik team till the end of the year.May be You, dear reader, will see this topic and will vote for this simple feature too! | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114029 | Thread-1114029 | RouterOS | Mikrotik, please do add support for hardware-backed SSH keys for logging in. Either the sk- version or the Mac enclave version (ecdsa-sha2-nistp256). It's been years since other OSes support this… | 1 | Well, thats one for the helpdesk, "feature request" inquiry. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114033 | Thread-1114033 | RouterOS | Hello everyone, We currently have several MikroTik routers running version 7+ and are using VRRP for redundancy. However, we’d like to implement configuration synchronization between these routers to streamline management and ensure consistency.I am aware of an existing Git projecthttps://github.com/svlsResearch/ha-mik... | 12 | interesting ideadid you literally mean synchronization? or did you mean orchestration?what kind of vrrp parameters value do you need to synchronize? | Yes, i mean synchronization of the config like firewall entries, etc.. between 2 routers. | I'm afraid synchronization can't be done between 2 vrrp routers - or at least that won't be easy. though it's possible.those 2 routers config mirrors each other. although the required parameters are exactly the same, but not for their value. ie. ip addresses, master-slave value, gateways etc.but if you meant orchestrat... | So far the best approach I have seen is that of @nathan1 -viewtopic.php?p=569009#p569009.There, VRRP is only used to detect the failure of the active router.As @wiseroute has pointed out, if you want the VRRP to work as designed, i.e. to only move the virtual gateways, and synchronize the configuration from the current... | Thanks for the information. Is there a tool or service I can use to orchestrate Mikrotik routers? Is it the dude Server?thanks | maybe you can start with thesehttps://mum.mikrotik.com/presentations/ ... 072199.pdfhttps://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest ... teros.htmlhttps://yetiops.net/posts/ansible-for-n ... em-numbershttps://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DMBx ... jJUU0jFkxd | Also you can try to influence how it's gonna look like in the future:viewtopic.php?t=211012 | Agree, in concept... But the problem is often "sync everything, except..." - with except part making it tricky.For example, the src-nat or dst-nat might vary in a VRRP setup, while all other firewall be same. How to express that in config, IDK....I guess IMO VRRP isn't special in the need to "sync config" between route... | @ammo, Agree, in concept... But the problem is often "sync everything, except..." - with except part making it tricky.sounds like a developer having a tough project because the customer keeps changing his mind??well... remembered the old days we used to do copy paste configs just with notepad. diff file1 file2. totally... | @ammo, Agree, in concept... But the problem is often "sync everything, except..." - with except part making it tricky.sounds like a developer having a tough project because the customer keeps changing his mind??I spend 20+ years in software engineering, so I'm a bit sympathetic to Mikrotik plight sometimes.And, history... | Personally, I've been a fan of some formalized "template" configuration that can be pushed from Dude, which should solve "VRRP config sync".@ammo, what if we just follow the wiki on a topic - let us say vrrp topic - its step by step manual already there - hence those are template.the problem is - as i followed what @si... | this will not work in production environment.I would say rather the opposite -cloningthe configuration from the active device to the standby one, i.e. copying it to the last bit, is the only way to make it work in a production environmentwithout using any external devicethat would handle the "selective copying" or how ... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114043 | Thread-1114043 | RouterOS | Is it possible to configure code 67 within an option set using option matcher? I've observed that unless I specify the boot file name under network settings, the boot file doesn't get applied, while other settings do. I'm seeking advice on how to effectively designate a boot file using either an option matcher or a MAC... | 7 | Maybe, 67 file 20mb.bin and the file is 20.bin? | if that was the case 20.bin would in in the DHCP offer but it isn't.going forward assume 20.bin for everything. I did attempt to change it to 20mb.bin but no change. | Can anyone verify DHCP option matcher works? And provide a working configuration based on the info I provided? | I think you need to provide bootfile name via bootp via this commands.boot-file-name (string; Default: )next-server (IP; Default: )https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:I ... r#Networks | If I want to have dynamic boot files for cable modems, I would like to make use of the mikrotiks built in DHCP options matcher and push next server and boot file. | I was finally able to fix the problem last night.apparently bootp need to be set to dynamic and dhcp option 66 has a bug where you have to put the value in hex? the rest of the settings work without an issue with strings. | Hello good morning how are you, I hope you are well, I am also trying to get the docsis provisioning to work through mikrotik, I was trying that same config, but I get an error from what I see in the modem log when it asks the configuration file "init(o) - modem ready to download config file" any suggestions? I also tr... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114073 | Thread-1114073 | RouterOS | Hello, Looks like MYNETNAME.NET is down. IP Cloud DDNS not working.Can you take a look? | 17 | I was having the same issue but it looks like it's back up now. | The same here. | same problem here | yes, back up now. Lasted about 1 hour. | yes, back up now. Lasted about 1 hour.yes it was back up and its down again now | yes it was back up and its down again nowYep same here. Just got an alert. | Same here... Whats going on? | same for me | Ditto, same problem here, I cannot reach my home VPN and cloud domain name is not resolvable.Mi folyik itt Gyöngyösön?! | Mi folyik itt Gyöngyösön?!Hát a Gyöngyös-patak! | Seems to be stable now | At least for now.Unfortunately, this was not an isolated incident as the MT cloud appears to lack sufficient redundancy. Whenever possible, we are phasing out the built-in function in favour of Cloudflare DDNS which is highly redundant and locally available through out the world. | I also have never used the Mikrotik DDNS service. Using Dynu.com and have never had a failure in a good five years. | At least for now.Unfortunately, this was not an isolated incident as the MT cloud appears to lack sufficient redundancy. Whenever possible, we are phasing out the built-in function in favour ofCloudflareDDNS which is highly redundant and locally available through out the world.Naturally, it works, and thus why MT shoul... | noticed I dropped a few ddns routers, is it down? I have been pushing the router alone for the ddns service and will need to stop if the service is getting terminated. | thanks for necroposting. better continue here:viewtopic.php?t=213191 | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | |
1114103 | Thread-1114103 | RouterOS | Mikrotik DDNS is down.who is Facing the same problem | 2 | Not alone, this incident seems to be tracked here:viewtopic.php?t=213191 | Mikrotik DDNS is down.who is Facing the same problemHAHA, did you even bother to read the forum threads to find out, there are at least two others noting same......... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114105 | Thread-1114105 | RouterOS | Hello.We use IF-MIB::ifSpeed in zabbix to monitor traffic of interfaces and alert when total bandwidth is above 80% for example. Well, we have one CCR 1036 with ROS 6.37.3 and running a bonding interface with 2 gigabit ports, with means one 2Gbps virtual port right? This is exactly what I get via SNMP.
```
IF-MIB::ifDe... | 17 | Hello, updating this post, 6.39.2 have the same problem reported before on 6.39.1.Mikrotik staff, this is clearly a bug, comments? | Hello, anyone knows if this issue is OK on new versions? | No, this is not fixed yet. Just tested on 6.40.3.
```
interfacebondingprintFlags:X-disabled,R-running0R name="bonding1"mtu=1500mac-address=E4:8D:8C:1B:72:D6 arp=enabled arp-timeout=autoslaves=ether3,ether4 mode=balance-rr primary=none link-monitoring=mii
arp-interval=100msarp-ip-targets=""mii-interval=100msdown-d... | What's new in 6.41rc38 (2017-Oct-03 11:51):...*) snmp - fixed "ifHighSpeed" value of VLAN, VRRP and Bonding interfaces;\o/ | Hello, I just make a test with 6.41.3 (and 6.41 also) and the problem persists.ifSpeed and ifHighSpeed are not informing the current speed of the Bonding interface, just of one interface on the bonding.Please, when we can get this solved? | Up.Mikrotik staff? | The fix "snmp - fixed "ifHighSpeed" value of VLAN, VRRP and Bonding interfaces;" should be backported to bugfix branch considering that many (W)ISP use this release.One more suggestion: set ifSpeed and ifHighSpeed for pppoe client interface to tx rate limit (from profile). In this way I can check if some client is satu... | But even on the current version, this not "fix" anything, we are getting the same wrong value.Since 6.39 we can not use this counter properly.It so hard to solve this bug? | We have a similar issue, .We have two SXT units online, 1 is responding correctly to the SNMP query, the second has the Ether1 & WLAN Interfaces switched:Both have been ungraded to 6.42.7*** WORKING ***IF-MIB::ifIndex.1 = INTEGER: 1IF-MIB::ifIndex.2 = INTEGER: 2IF-MIB::ifIndex.3 = INTEGER: 3IF-MIB::ifDescr.1 = STRING: ... | @marcioeliasWe are also using Zabbix - would you share how you do the followingIF-MIB::ifSpeed in zabbix to monitor traffic of interfaces and alert when total bandwidth is above 80% for example.thank you | Hello @tbitech1.For sure.I will do better, just created a git repo to put templates, and this one is there.https://github.com/marcioelias/Zabbix-TemplatesAll you will need to do is translate hardcoded titles in Portuguese.To bypass the problem that was exposed at this thread, I have modified the trigger prototype on th... | Hi Marcio, Wonderfulwill give it a try and let you know how it works.thank you | hi, same problem in 6.44.2Interface bonding1(): Speed 2020-04-15 14:33:25 1 Gbpsany reply from mt when this will be resolved ? | This bug still exists on 6.45.7 | If you have not yet done, you should send an email tosupport@mikrotik.com. | I have the same problem with CCR2116-12G-4S+ on ROS 7.15.2. Bonding with two SFP+, but speed in OID 1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.15 is 10 gigabit. | I know this in an old post, but i have this issue as well, i know the value can be modified changing the custom multiplier but there must be something that can be done on the mikrotik side as well, i hope there's a solution to this | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114142 | Thread-1114142 | RouterOS | I have a WAp LTE on my desk that is unable to scan for operators. Enabled the logging for LTE and got the following error:reply timeout for: AT E0 V1Any Ideas? | 5 | I think Mikrotik L11e-LTE is unmatured product with lots of bug.i m too Facing issues Mikrotik LTE Module.viewtopic.php?f=2&t=132492Ticket#2018032122002781 | So the issue i found was in the SXT. The SIM was one issue.I couldn't use a "data only sim", this is what happens when it says a SIM is not inserted.The other issue i had was Packages. I had to make sure i had the LTE and the. calea package installed. calea comes with the advanced package.ON that note, make sure youonl... | owent04rhope this helpsAnswering to 2 years case you should mention about upgrade the ROS version with boot-firmware and then upgrade modem-firmware.BRMarcin Przysowa | Seeing same issue with 7.16.1 what is the solution to this issue?The device was working days, now it is not able to get a connection via LTE anymore.What is the root of this issue?
```
14:25:22lte,error lte1 mbim:>>>E#10 - connect: register state, error: FAILURE14:25:22lte,info lte1 mbim:error:continuing after:network ... | Upgrading to 7.16.2 and upgrading FIRMWARE also, did the trick.LTE Interface is online.But why was it online 2 weeks or so and then it stopped working?This device should go up on a tower on 50m. We need a lift to get to that position. when the device fails again, this will be a worst szenario because we have to rent a ... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114165 | Thread-1114165 | RouterOS | Hello guys, I m gettting crazy currently.I have an working setup for hotspot. https is working and the rest also. But for wired devices - connected to interface 8 on hotspot bridge I cant get advertisment to work. I can access the dns via https, but not auto connection.routerboard: yesmodel: RB5009UPr+S+firmware-type: ... | 2 | Okay. Can someone give me an idiot reward?The issue was that Windows 11 Client first makes an DNS lookup and after that somehow goes into redirect to hotspot. But because I was testing in an enviroment without uplink (dont ask), dns request didnt work. So I created a static a record for the public testing webseite and ... | perfect. you can mark the post as solved. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114186 | Thread-1114186 | RouterOS | Hello, i have setup a Mikrotik Hotspot and it works fine.To Solve the issue that ssl (443) requests are not redirect to the login-page, i have created a let's encrypt dns certificate and add this to the hotspot profile.Now if a device is connected to the system, the login popup appaer.But, if a user click on "use netwo... | 3 | If the user is now using any browser to open "google.com", the login page will not appaer. Is there a solution to redirect the traffic for unauthorized devices to the login-page? | try to make a rule in ip firewall nat on the unauth chain with dst Port 443 protocol tcp and as action I would try return you have to place it among the first unauth rules | isn't the rule existing with the default hotspot configuration (number 11)?
```
admin@hotspot] > /ip/firewall/nat/print
Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid; D - dynamic
0 D chain=dstnat action=jump jump-target=hotspot hotspot=from-client
1 D chain=hotspot action=jump jump-target=pre-hotspot
2 D chain=hotspot actio... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114197 | Thread-1114197 | RouterOS | HiI am running 17 CRS328-24P-4S+ connected to 2 CRS317-1G-16S+ using this SFP S+32LC10D. The 328 boxes are running RouterOS 6.43.2 and the CRS317 boxes are running 6.43.4. I am experiencing that all the ports on the CRS317 are going up and down with anything between minutes to hours apart. It is almost no traffic on th... | 224 | Try 6.43.7 and make sure routerboot is also updated. | Sure, i dont see anything about the 317s in the changelog, but i'll try. Will give a new status in about 24h, will see if anything has changed. | Try 6.43.7 and make sure routerboot is also updated.Sad to say, but this made no difference. | I am also seeing some link downs on CRS328 switches but the firmware update made them significantly less for me. | Did you find a fix yet? | Unfortunately not. I sendt them the support files at 22. Nov and did a follow up on 4. Des. Still no reply. Would be great if MT would have a look at this. | From the MikroTik site it looks to me like the S+32LC10D is specifically meant to have the S+23LC10D module on the other end. Are you using the same module on both ends? | I have the SAME EXACT problem. Mikrotik needs to fix this. No problem with 1Gbps SFP but with OWM SFP+ it's hell. I think this could be combination of software and hardware problem with SFP+ modules. | I have the SAME EXACT problem. Mikrotik needs to fix this. No problem with 1Gbps SFP but with OWM SFP+ it's hell. I think this could be combination of software and hardware problem with SFP+ modules.I agree with you assumtion that this is an edge case between the SFP units and the switch. But strangely it only occurs o... | From the MikroTik site it looks to me like the S+32LC10D is specifically meant to have the S+23LC10D module on the other end. Are you using the same module on both ends?I am using the paired SFP+ from Mikrotik S+2332LC10D. So yes. | What's the fix Mikrotik? | Push - she problem on CRS328 here.... waiting for a fix | We had this same problem appear on one of our 317s. I am not 100% sure when it started, but it was observed on 6.43.4. The upgrade to 6.43.7 fixed it, but ONLY after I did a full factory reset and reloaded the configuration by hand (it wasn't complex).We also observed it for a brief time on several of the 328s. Switchi... | We are experiencing the same thing. Running 6.42.7 with DAC Cable from CRS317 to CRS328-4C-20S-4S+RM.I had to go to a SFP 1G on both units for the flapping to stop. I had tried SFP+ DAC and SFP+ single mode fiber with the same issue.We have 8 CRS212 plugged into the CRS317 via DAC Cable with no issue. Only the 328 SFP+... | Exactly the same problem here. Links between CRS317 and CRS328-4C-20S-4S+ are flapping. I have 3 pairs of 317 <-> 328 and all have the same problem. I tried different SFP/DAC. The latest firmware (6.43.does not help. No problem with 1GbE links....... | I sendt MT a service dump in november - still no answer. Could i bother you guys that are experiencing the same problem with sending MT an email urging them to have a look at the issue - or at least give some feedback. I am experiencing total radio silence. | Are any of you using port ether1 or just sfp-plus ports? If you are, remember that "The new Cloud Router Switch 317-1G-16S+RM is a rack-mountable manageable switch with Layer3 features, it has 16 SFP+ ports for high performance 10GbE connectivity and a1GbE copper port for management." | Are any of you using port ether1 or just sfp-plus ports? If you are, remember that "The new Cloud Router Switch 317-1G-16S+RM is a rack-mountable manageable switch with Layer3 features, it has 16 SFP+ ports for high performance 10GbE connectivity and a1GbE copper port for management."I can only speak for myself - and i... | I think the problem is the CRS328. We use the CRS317 as Core with downlinks to different CA devices, some with 1GbE and some with 10GbE. The only affected links are those between CRS317 and CRS328 with 10GbE. | exact same issue here, same symptoms, same workaround (force 1G link), it would be great if Mikrotik took this issue seriously... | I ever had bad experiences with CRSs port flapping and I don't use them anymore, both ethernets and SFPs.Sometimes on CCRs ports go totally down, disabling and enabling them solves the problem. | Sometimes on CCRs ports go totally down, disabling and enabling them solves the problem.In production context ? | I've wrote to Mikrotik Support ~2 weeks ago and also our Distributor said he would contact Mikrotik but till now no reaction. | Hi, I got an answer from support. They could reproduce the flapping issue and are working on a solution. | Same problem over here with CRS328-4C-20S-4S+RM on Sfp+ ports. I'm connected to a Dell X1052 with S+DA0003.Let's wait for the correction. | I will add my agreement to this thread. I have a CRS317-1G-16S+ with 4 CRS328-24P-4S+ and 3 CSS326-24G-2S+RM All are using the Maxxwave MW-SX+MM-US Modules. I have the same port flaping on all the CRS328 ports and the CRS317 reboots on a regular basis. The links to the CSS326's seem to be stable. I too am interested in... | hi, same for us. We fighting with the same problem on our CRS317-1G-16S+ (viewtopic.php?f=2&t=146044). We thougth, it might be a configuration issue. I replaced cable, SFP+ modules (Allnet / Ubiquitiy) but nothing helped. Now I replaced the both ports (core-03 and core-04) with the 10G copper SFP ports and its seems no... | i mean the same problemport flapping on CRS328-24P-4S+ and CRS317-1G-16S+software version 6.44I tried different SFP modules.Are there any solutions to this problem? | Me too..317 - Ccr 10Gb mk Dac ok317 - 326 10Gb mk S+85DLC03D ok317 - 328 10Gb mk Dac flappingThe strange thing is that for over one month all worked fine, after that, without any change, the flapping began.Forcing the Dac to 1Gbps stop the flapping immediatly, now we are monitoring it, but we need 10Gb connections. | hello folks, we have multiple CRS317-1G-16S+ and CRS328-24P+4S+ with the same problem.All running RouterOS and firmware 6.44.They all connected togehter with Mikrotik DAC S+DA0001.After switching to RouterOS and firmware to 6.45beta6 (Testing) don't solve the flapping port problem.Last try....Finally we switched on the... | hi, Me too..317 - Ccr 10Gb mk Dac ok317 - 326 10Gb mk S+85DLC03D ok317 - 328 10Gb mk Dac flappingThe strange thing is that for over one month all worked fine, after that, without any change, the flapping began.Forcing the Dac to 1Gbps stop the flapping immediatly, now we are monitoring it, but we need 10Gb connections.... | hmm, same problemCRS317-1G-16S+ vs CRS326-24G-2S+ - DACtoday CRS317 stop traffic and in same time CRS326 stop working port connecting to CRS317.MKv6.44 | hello folks, update:After we switched on the CRS317-1G-16S+ to SwitchOS 2.95 days without port flapping.regards | hello folks, update:After we switched on the CRS317-1G-16S+ to SwitchOS 2.95 days without port flapping.regardsThis is good news and indicative of software issues. Raising the probability of a fix. I have however met nothing but radio silence from MT lately, have any of you guys gotten any info from them? | What's the stats of the fix? | After we switched on the CRS317-1G-16S+ to SwitchOS 2.95 days without port flapping.Hi roggles, still stable with SwitchOs? | yes, since there are no log entries | CRS317 replaced with UBNT EdgeSwitch 16XG. Problem solved. I will not wait for the device to stop 1Gbit traffic.I won't wait for it to ever be fixed. Similar to flapping on RB3011 and the like.MIkrotik -1000. | Have the same problem with UF-SM-10G & CRS317-1G-16S+ with 6.42.12.Any RoOS version with fix? | Have the same problem with UF-SM-10G & CRS317-1G-16S+ with 6.42.12.Any RoOS version with fix?Could you please send us email, about your setup and problem, tosupport@mikrotik.com? | Have the same problem with UF-SM-10G & CRS317-1G-16S+ with 6.42.12.Any RoOS version with fix?Could you please send us email, about your setup and problem, tosupport@mikrotik.com?Hi! How Is the fix coming along? | Could you please send us email, about your setup and problem, tosupport@mikrotik.com?Ticket#2019040322003846 | Could you please send us email, about your setup and problem, tosupport@mikrotik.com?Ticket#2019040322003846Where do i get additional information about tickets? I see no links in the emails i have gotten. | Severe port flapping on 10G links, works with auto-negotiation turned off and set to 1g.CRS317-1G-16S+ <<>> CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+, Flapping at 10G, Works stable at 1GCRS317-1G-16S+ <<>> CRS328-4C-20S-4S+, Flapping at 10G, Works stable at 1GCRS317-1G-16S+ <<>> CRS212-1G-10S-1S+, Works Stable at 10G.CRS328-4C-20S-4S+<<>> CRS... | Does anyone have port flapping problem with 10G link between CRS317-1G-16S+ <<>> CRS317-1G-16S+ ?In our case it starts to happen after about a week after reboot and it happens on 2 of 3 ports. We tried to interchange modules used on stable link - but on other link it also flaps.We have flapping on 1 & 5 ports, but no f... | Mikrotik support tell us that the problem is well known and that they don't have ETA for the resolution.Their official workarround is to downgrade links to 1Gb or use switchos on 317I hope that someone take care about this terrible bug!!Alessandro | file bug | Hello, SwitchOS is one big pile of shit with no real featues, as it was intended for the general audience.When i add SFP media converters or non-mikrotik or unmanaged switches on the other end it does not pick the link up.But ROS does, hence we cannot use SWOS at all (As a last resort even if it a very crap OS .). | Hello, SwitchOS is one big pile of shit with no real featues, as it was intended for the general audience.When i add SFP media converters or non-mikrotik or unmanaged switches on the other end it does not pick the link up.But ROS does, hence we cannot use SWOS at all (As a last resort even if it a very crap OS .).You a... | BTW, how do u guys can confirm that there no port flapping under SwOS? I didnt find any log section in SwOS web interface... | You have to check it on 328 side, looking for disconnections or rstp recalculation | So seems like the problem is with CRS317-1G-16S+We have one CRS317-1G-16S+ in center and three CRS317-1G-16S+ at remote ends, after 6 days from reboot we got port flapping - but not on all ports, we tried to change SFP+ modules, cables but no sense. After we changed from RoOS to SwOS on central CRS317-1G-16S+ log files... | I have issues on the CRS328 connecting to a Siklu. | I can confirm that the problem appear also with 2 CRS317 connected trought mk DAC.PLEASE MIKROTIK, GIVE US SUPPORT!!!!!!!!! | I confirm the problem with the CRS328 and CRS317 connection.The problem is partially solved by the change of the CRS317 system to SwOS. But still Rx FCS Errors occur on the 10G interfaces.[Ticket#2019051422003403] | Mikrotik, this issue has almost 6 months !!It seems that Mikrotik acknowledges the problem, my reseller confirmed this point, you should be able to prioritize this issue as it affects core features : we're unable to deliver 10G connectivity !! | The problem is partially solved by the change of the CRS317 system to SwOS. But still Rx FCS Errors occur on the 10G interfaces.We can confirm the same, but not on all interfaces, those that were stable on RoOS have only 2 Errors. | Mikrotik support, please WAKE UP!!Customers are angry and whants different brand hardware! | *) crs3xx - improved switch-chip resource allocation on CRS326, CRS328, CRS305;..but still problem not fixed.1.PNG2.PNG | Can anybody try to add attenuators on problematic links? Would it change anything? | Can anybody try to add attenuators on problematic links? Would it change anything?That seems unlikely as I have the same link flapping on my DAC links btween the CRS328 and CRS317 on 10G links. Something seems to be wrong (software or hardware??), but Mikrotik does not seem to be interested... | Does the DAC link have Rx FCS Errors also? | Does the DAC link have Rx FCS Errors also?YesThis is the setup on my desk. It does nothing, only connections between switches.3.PNG | We are having this issue as well between two CRS317-1G-16S+ in our datacenter. We wrote an E-Mail to MikroTik Support on the 18th of May.There has not been any reaction since*.EDIT: *except for the automated reply message. | Our client has 200+ units installed in different locations, now even in 1G is not stable.We have been pushed for months, mikrotik nothing to say.Very bad service, client try to use Ubq to replace all CRS328.I am thinking about it too, maybe we should close the distribution with Mikrotik. | Very bad service, client try to use Ubq to replace all CRS328.Hi gentrice, we are angry too, but the problem we are talking here is on crs317.. what kind of problem do you have on crs328? | There has not been any reaction since*.We received an answer that MikroTik is aware of this issue and is working on a solution. | Have anyone gotten any time estimates on when flapgate is beeing fixed? | new reply by mk support:We are working on this problem, it could take up to a couple of weeks, to find a proper solution and test it.we hope it... | Hi gentrice, we are angry too, but the problem we are talking here is on crs317.. what kind of problem do you have on crs328?We were able to reproduce this issue on CRS328-24P-4S+ connected via SFP+ DAC to a CRS317-1G-16S+. We tested the following scenarios:.) change SFP+ port on CRS328 -> port keeps flapping.) change ... | In our scenario we needed to connect CCR1036-8G-2S+ (ROS 6.44.1) to CRS328-4C-20S-4S+ (SwitchOS 2.9) using Mikrotik SFP+ DAC 1m. We got 10G FDX connection, but it was always unstable. We had the following troubles:10G link flapping, sometimes, when it wants)After a few hours of good working tagged traffic between CCR10... | What's the status on this Mikrotik? | Any progress on this Mikrotik? It has been 6 months with no fix. Could we have an update and a plan to a fix? | do not use DAC. | do not use DAC.this issue also happens with mikrotik SFP+ and fibers | I can confirm thatthereisthe same problem on :CSS326-24G-2S+ with SwOS 2.9Any SFP+ device connected to port EXCEPT connection toCRS317-1G-16S+ with SwOS 2.7(with any SFP+ optic module and DAC working as required)there innotproblem at all on:CRS317-1G-16S+ with SwOS 2.7 (we are unable to upgrade to 2.8 or 2.9 because sw... | Today we started to request the replacement of flapping CRS328, where we were able to systematically reproduce it, at our distributor. | Hello. I need to buy two 24 port switches and I have to choose between CRS326 and second hand Cisco 2960G, the price is the same. If I take CRS326 it will be used with RouterOS for access switch. From what I read in forum, SwOS is not ready for "in production" setups and this is the reason to choose CRS326 instead of C... | Hello. I need to buy two 24 port switches and I have to choose between CRS326 and second hand Cisco 2960G, the price is the same. If I take CRS326 it will be used with RouterOS for access switch. From what I read in forum, SwOS is not ready for "in production" setups and this is the reason to choose CRS326 instead of C... | According to all posters here, the problem presents itself only in connection with CRS317 and 10G SFP+. So it will not happen to your setup.I think the same GuJack20. Do you have CRS326 in production? If you have, what is your opinion for the switch? Somebody else do you have CRS326 in production running RouterOS? | I think the same GuJack20. Do you have CRS326 in production? If you have, what is your opinion for the switch? Somebody else do you have CRS326 in production running RouterOS?Hi, please open or write in a thread/section where your question is addressed. This thread is about a severe port flapping issue on CRS328 and CR... | Hi, please open or write in a thread/section where your question is addressed. This thread is about a severe port flapping issue on CRS328 and CRS317 as the title reflects.Thanks, nhEDIT: corrected a typo of product names.I'm sorry if this is mistake. I posted here because CRS328 is the same as CRS326 but with PoE. If ... | CRS328 to HP DL380 10gbit direct connection, port flapping exists.so this it not mikrotik-to-core or mikrotik-to-mikrotik connection issue, something wrong in hardware design, I guess. | Same problem appeared suddenly after months of uptime. Two links between CRS326 and CRS317 (two of both devices) - one works perfectly and other link is flooding logs and causing packet loss. All troubleshooting attempts lead to conclusion, that CRS317 is the source of the problem - when we cross-connected the uplinks ... | Now we did one test with the problematic link - we converted it to 10GbE with CAT7 and pair of RJ-10 modules. For more than hour of heavy load there was absolutely no link downs or any packet loss - so this is not likely related to topology issues etc. When we connected ports with fiber as before, all problems were bac... | Good Morning, has anyone check this behaivour with the new version 6.45.1?Regards | It is bad, when things get broken, but it is not better, when they suddenly get "cured" by itself.My problem just suddenly disappeared by itself. Link has been up from friday afternoon and all packet loss has also disappeared. Nobody has done anything to this link or the devices, nobody has even been in the server room... | On the latest version 6.45.1, the problem is still exist.The bundle ( CRS328-24P-4S+ and CRS317-1G-16S+ ) constantly (~ 5-7 minutes) flapping occursMikrotik, you can finally pay attention to the problem !!!Several tickets were created in the support, and not one received an answer on this issue.Many people suffer from ... | I have the same combination: CRS328-24P-4S+ and CRS317-1G-16S+. Yesterday I installed 6.45.1. Since that time the number of port flaps increased dramatically (from once every few days to 70 during the last 24 hours!)The CRS328 reports:Rx Error Events 2335The CRS317 reports:Rx FCS Error 2389Rx Error Events 2650What is h... | First, I love MikroTik products and RouterOS.It was a big mistake to buy the combination (1x CRS317-1G-16S+ and 2x CRS328-4C-20S-4S+).The expectation was that it should work fine, because it goes from the same manufacturer to the same manufacturer10G to 10G Fiber SFP+ Tests with RouterOS 6.45.1from CRS317-1G-16S+ to CR... | It is funny to see that in your case it is the combination CRS317-1G-16S+ to CRS328-4C-20S-4S+ that is flapping too. I have some links from the CRS317 to server that work great. The same applies to other links on the CRS328. One would guess that Mikrotik would be able to track the problem easily as it occurs between th... | It's might not be always like that. My problem lasted for weeks, then it suddenly disappeared and now emerged again after 10 days. Now it has been flapping again for a second day in the row. This kind of problems can take a lot of time if there's no ways to "accelerate" the process... | Our investigation has revealed that there might be a SFP+ compatibility issue with specific CRS317-1G-16S+ units when connected to other CRS3xx devices resulting in random link downs. Please, contact MikroTik support if you experience similar issue, we will verify it and arrange a repair if necessary. | Could you be more precise? Is there a way to identify the cause and what would be done during repair?Think about the folks which are running these switches now without flapping ports, but might run into problems as soon as CRS3xx are installed.We would like to know about the issue before the installation if possible. | Hello, i can't belive that anyone else have a working connection between the CRS317-1G-16S+ and the CRS3xx devices.We have three CRS317-1G-16S+ and over 10 CRS328-24P-4S+RM and no combination works without flapping.All of them are updated to 6.45.1. ( firmware also! ) and we used original Mikrotik DAC Cables.For Mikrot... | Our investigation has revealed that there might be a SFP+ compatibility issue with specific CRS317-1G-16S+ units when connected to other CRS3xx devices resulting in random link downs. Please, contact MikroTik support if you experience similar issue, we will verify it and arrange a repair if necessary.Is there something... | HahahaNot well done MikroTik - hardware related problem?And why when you switch to SwOS there is no such problem, only CRS3017 with RouterOS?Same hardware - different behavior = simply software bug! | Our investigation has revealed that there might be a SFP+ compatibility issue with specific CRS317-1G-16S+ units when connected to other CRS3xx devices resulting in random link downs. Please, contact MikroTik support if you experience similar issue, we will verify it and arrange a repair if necessary.The worst problems... | CRS317 and CRS328 would be a great hardware combination and ideal for FTTX deployments.I hope that the error can be corrected with a software update.Both devices work great (in my case), if they are not connected to each other. | Yesterday connected the new one CRS317-1G-16S+On it, not one flap happened.On old one also connected to same CRS328-24P-4S+ for this time 88 times.And also noticed a strange thing.Interface status, last link up / down shows a strange time.The system time is correct, and in the status is wrong/strange time. | Yesterday connected the new one CRS317-1G-16S+On it, not one flap happened.So it could really be a hardware problemAnd also noticed a strange thing.Interface status, last link up / down shows a strange time.time is not right for me either. strange bug... | I thinkCRS326-24G-2S+RMandCRS125-24G-1Scontains same problem.SFP+ port in 1G mode - no problems.SFP+ port in 10G mode - problematic case even with Mikrotik DAC's.Update:problems raised when connecting two identical CRS326-24G-2S+RM devices with 10G DAC cable on SFP+ port.Not all of devices was affected in my case. Tota... | Our investigation has revealed that there might be a SFP+ compatibility issue with specific CRS317-1G-16S+ units when connected to other CRS3xx devices resulting in random link downs. Please, contact MikroTik support if you experience similar issue, we will verify it and arrange a repair if necessary.@BECS: is there a ... | Is there any update on this?can we buy mt hardware again or does this issue still persist?BR | as MK support said: "if possible, please, consider using CRS309-1G-8S+ as replacement in similar applications todecrease probabilityof encountering this issue." | as MK support said: "if possible, please, consider using CRS309-1G-8S+ as replacement in similar applications todecrease probabilityof encountering this issue."If this is the case - it is simply not good enough. I have 30 of these devices in an installation, and -all- of them are experiencing this issue. It has almost ... | To all posters here, i'm afraid that this is a combination of HW and SW problem when there's a SFP+ connection between CRS 317 and CRS 328 and simply put, don't expect that anything's gonna change anytime soon.We've replaced CRS 328 with much more expensive Cisco devices and it works like a charm.So my advice would be:... | I have to say that it seems that there are eithera) just a few CRS317 affectedor/andb) most buyers not aware of this issueor/andc) the amount of CRS317 <- 10G SFP+ -> CRS328 combinations are lowIt seems that MikroTik accepts the risk to repair/replace a few CRS317 and continues selling a device which does not provide 1... | To all posters here, i'm afraid that this is a combination of HW and SW problem when there's a SFP+ connection between CRS 317 and CRS 328 and simply put, don't expect that anything's gonna change anytime soon.We've replaced CRS 328 with much more expensive Cisco devices and it works like a charm.So my advice would be:... | Let's add some advice:use CRS317 with SwOS (no other ver than 3.7) instead of RouterOS | I think we have a similar problem.I'm testing the two just arrived Microtik CRS 317-1G-16+ switches.I have my computer connected on ETH 10/100/1000 management/data port and a 100mbs ethernet link connected throught a S-RJ01 SFP (listed in MicroTik compatibility listhttps://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/MikroTik ... lity_table... | Just use (mention above) SwOS 2.7 - 2.9 has a lot of bugs (see topicviewtopic.php?f=21&t=144031)p.s. never use management port for traffic on switch | To all posters here, i'm afraid that this is a combination of HW and SW problem when there's a SFP+ connection between CRS 317 and CRS 328 and simply put, don't expect that anything's gonna change anytime soon.We've replaced CRS 328 with much more expensive Cisco devices and it works like a charm.So my advice would be:... | I have to say that it seems that there are eithera) just a few CRS317 affectedor/andb) most buyers not aware of this issueor/andc) the amount of CRS317 <- 10G SFP+ -> CRS328 combinations are lowIt seems that MikroTik accepts the risk to repair/replace a few CRS317 and continues selling a device which does not provide 1... | We are having massive issues with this. We have replaced the switch reset the config and its still shocking. Its 100% the CRS328's not the CRS317'sWe have also changed the optics i dont know how many times tried DAC's its still awful.see the picture this is less than 24hours up-time! | Its 100% the CRS328's not the CRS317'sMy experience tells otherwise - links between 317 and 326 are flapping, but when link from one 317 is connected to other 326, then flapping travels along with "sick" 317.I don't know about 328-24P-4S+, but 326 seems to have similar hardware (counting out PoE and amount of sfp+ port... | Its 100% the CRS328's not the CRS317'sMy experience tells otherwise - links between 317 and 326 are flapping, but when link from one 317 is connected to other 326, then flapping travels along with "sick" 317.I don't know about 328-24P-4S+, but 326 seems to have similar hardware (counting out PoE and amount of sfp+ port... | Some can see the post, no port flapping, but other problems, viewtopic.php?f=2&t=150971Thanks! | Its 100% the CRS328's not the CRS317'sMy experience tells otherwise - links between 317 and 326 are flapping, but when link from one 317 is connected to other 326, then flapping travels along with "sick" 317.I don't know about 328-24P-4S+, but 326 seems to have similar hardware (counting out PoE and amount of sfp+ port... | Does this mean that Mikrotik knowingly continues to sell a faulty product?According to the findings within this thread and the information I received from our distributor: Yes. | Does this mean that Mikrotik knowingly continues to sell a faulty product?According to the findings within this thread and the information I received from our distributor: Yes.So almost one year after, we're at the same place....We've bought high-end devices from Mikrotik, hoping for full 10G support : Mikrotik Support... | So, we just bought a faulty device too, I see! We got a second piece of CRS317-1G-16S+ and the interconnection between the two of them has exactly the problems discussed here - port flapping and packet loss. It seems to be much better when connecting the two devices on higher ports rather than on the lower ports, but s... | Exact same problem here, but it is between any CRS317-1G-16S+. Have confirmed its present on ALL links between CRS317's, but not any link to any other device or switch.Initially I thought it was a cable fault, but we've changed cables, SFPs, etc. Same result. Once I found this thread we've come to realise its yet anoth... | Hi!I just found this topic.Did you use the Mikrotik switch through an UPS(uninterruptible power supply - pure sinus-wave type) hardware ?If not, then this maybe a main problem - the power supply might have receiving some OVP/UVP/NOISE effects - causing the port flapping. | Hi!I just found this topic.Did you use the Mikrotik switch through an UPS(uninterruptible power supply - sinus wave type) hardware ?If not, then this maybe a main problem - the power supply might have receiving some OVP/OCP/SCP effects - causing the port flapping.In my case - yes, they were on a UPS. | Hi people! Looks like MT is finally stepping up. I got this email from them today.We got the Supout.rif from CRS317 that you just sent, looks like we didn't receive couple of emails that you sent previously(sic). But yeah, from Supout.rif we can see that CRS317 - 846C083E29E4 is indeed faulty and needs an hardware repa... | Hi!I just found this topic.Did you use the Mikrotik switch through an UPS(uninterruptible power supply - sinus wave type) hardware ?If not, then this maybe a main problem - the power supply might have receiving some OVP/OCP/SCP effects - causing the port flapping.In my case - yes, they were on a UPS.Hi!I read in other ... | If the problem is on power supply there will be port flapping always, no matter what OS is running.I have always port flapping when winning RouterOS (every single version on it) and never when running SwOS 2.7. We have a lot of 317 some connected to 326, 328 - different versions, all with SFP+ 10G running without singl... | Hi!I just found this topic.Did you use the Mikrotik switch through an UPS(uninterruptible power supply - sinus wave type) hardware ?If not, then this maybe a main problem - the power supply might have receiving some OVP/OCP/SCP effects - causing the port flapping.In my case - yes, they were on a UPS.Hi!I read in other ... | If the problem is on power supply there will be port flapping always, no matter what OS is running.I have always port flapping when winning RouterOS (every single version on it) and never when running SwOS 2.7. We have a lot of 317 some connected to 326, 328 - different versions, all with SFP+ 10G running without singl... | It's very normal to have issues on copper port, because of potential difference generated by two sides of the cable. On twisted pair technology this must be no problem at all, but very often it is indeed.On the other hand optic ports have no such problem at all and power related problems are just fiction. | Hi!I just found this topic.Did you use the Mikrotik switch through an UPS(uninterruptible power supply - sinus wave type) hardware ?If not, then this maybe a main problem - the power supply might have receiving some OVP/OCP/SCP effects - causing the port flapping.In my case - yes, they were on a UPS.Hi!I read in other ... | Since it sounds like its not an isolated issue (lol), I wont bother posting all my topology. However, We just deployed close to 10 317s, and are experiencing flapping on ONE of them. If that's useful to anyone. All 317 to 317 connections. | Hi I have a CRS317-1G-16S+ and have had or trouble ticket open with Mikrotik support for months. I am wondering if anyone has had success getting their unit repaired or replaced and if so was the problem resolved with the new/repaired unit. In my case it works with 1Gb links. 10 GB links flap attached to any CRS switch... | I am wondering if anyone has had success getting their unit repaired or replaced and if so was the problem resolved with the new/repaired unit.I have one RMA'd with my supplier. On week 2 of the 4-6 week turn around... | Has anyone tried the new CRS326-24S+2Q+RM Cloud Router Switch? I am wondering if it has the same port issues when connection at 10GB to other CRS3xx switches as the CRS317. | I am wondering if anyone has had success getting their unit repaired or replaced and if so was the problem resolved with the new/repaired unit.I have one RMA'd with my supplier. On week 2 of the 4-6 week turn around...My RMA (6 - 8 weeks) is only in the third week. I was told that a replacement would not make sense as ... | Hello, we have the new CRS326-24S-2Q+RM here and they worked 2 days without problems now.I have connected this device to an CRS328-24P-4S through Mikrotik DAC Cables and multiple Mikrotik S+R10 r2.We have also sent three of our CRS317-1G-16S+ back for RMA.regards | Has anyone tried the new CRS326-24S+2Q+RM Cloud Router Switch? I am wondering if it has the same port issues when connection at 10GB to other CRS3xx switches as the CRS317.All the sources indicate that is only that specific combination that this topic is affected, and maybe even then only some part of CRS317 affected.I... | we got 4 new crs317 as replacement (they have been tested at our supplier) but they show the same behaviour....the recommended crs309 and 312 do not work as a replacement for us since we need the port density in that specific usecase. Has anyone given the new MikroTik CRS326-24S+2Q+RM a try?in an other place I would co... | Has anyone given the new MikroTik CRS326-24S+2Q+RM a try?Yes, got a CRS326-24S+2Q+RM yesterday (great device, many switch chip features).Works great in conjunction with CRS328-4C-20S-4S+RM.No more SFP+ 10G Port flapping (we have one CRS317-1G-16S+RM in RMA). | Hi.I also see problems with port flapping when using CRS317-1G-16S+RM <-> S+DA0001 <-> CRS326-24G-2S+RM.CRS317-1G-16S+RM <-> SNR-SFP+LR-2 <-> CRS326-24G-2S+RM the problem is present.All ports are switched to 1G now. But, on one port after turning on the RX / TX Flow Control option to auto, we observed RX Errors at firs... | Hi, we can confirm that CRS328-24P-4S+ in combination with CRS312-4C+8XG show the exact same problematic port flapping behavior (RouterOS & FW v6.45.6) as the CRS317-1G-16S+. The exact testing scenario is:- 2x CRS312-4C+8XG (both new)- 2x CRS328-24P-4S+ (1 new, 1 used but "working as expected" from our supplier)- The C... | I can confirm this as well.Hi, we can confirm that CRS328-24P-4S+ in combination with CRS312-4C+8XG show the exact same problematic port flapping behavior (RouterOS & FW v6.45.6) as the CRS317-1G-16S+. The exact testing scenario is:- 2x CRS312-4C+8XG (both new)- 2x CRS328-24P-4S+ (1 new, 1 used but "working as expected... | Anyone tested the CRS326-24S+2Q+RM yet? | I changed 2 317 with 2 326-24+The link with all 328 and between 326-24+ are now fine @10GbpsOne link with 326-24G still flap and needed to be set @1GpbsBetter then before, but seems to be not fully resolved.Alessandro | Received my CRS-317 back from RMA. The problem was NOT fixed, still produces FCS Errors immediately when configuring the link at 10G with a CRS-328. | I am having the same problem with the CSS326-24G-2S+ on the SFP+ ports.I am connecting a workstation with an Intel X520 10Gb card and Fiberstore Cisco SFP-10G-SR SFP+ modules.My Linux dmesg is full of this:ixgbe 0000:42:00.1 enp66s0f1: NIC Link is Downixgbe 0000:42:00.1 enp66s0f1: NIC Link is Up 10 Gbps, Flow Control: ... | Hello, we have received our CRS317-1G-16S+ back from rma on Oct, 10th since then no port flapping.We have also running the new CRS326-24S+2Q+ since Aug, 23 and there are no port flapping.regards | After issuing RMA and receiving new unit it seems like this issue has been resolved - there has been no link downs or any sort of data errors for over a month of uptime... | I am still waiting for the RMA of my CRS317: after 8 weeks I asked the shop and they checked with MT: it is waiting for parts and no idea when they will arrive. I am quite disappointed by this whole story. What a mess!!The shop sent me a new CRS317 that I installed today. No flaps yet but in only 2 hours I see 15 FCS e... | I am still waiting for the RMA of my CRS317: after 8 weeks I asked the shop and they checked with MT: it is waiting for parts and no idea when they will arrive. I am quite disappointed by this whole story. What a mess!!The shop sent me a new CRS317 that I installed today. No flaps yet but in only 2 hours I see 15 FCS e... | Just installed CRS317-1G-16S+ and connect them with Mikrotik 10G modules to 5x CRS328-24P-4S+ (RouterOS 6.45.7). Port flapping on all links every 3-8 minutes.I found this theme and now I don't know what to do. | Hi allI recently got a reply from MT after sending them the support files from affected switches. The said that I should start an RMA process with my vendor. I did and got the new qsfp switch instead. Has worked flawlessly so far. | I have a network connected via switches as follows:1 unit CRS317-1G-16S+ as core5 unit CRS328-24P-4S+, 1 at the same cabinet as core, while the other 4 at each satellite buildings in one campusThe satellite buildings are all connected via singlemode fiber, and I installed 10G LR SFP+ on each.All running RouterOS v6.45.... | I posted several times above:This problem persists only on CRS317 running RouterOS (any version).If you don’t want port flapping at all, use SwOS 2.7 or 2.10 (don’t even try 2.8, 2.9).We have many 317 in different configurations with heavy traffic, hundreds of vlans, many of them connected with 10G links to CSS326, CRS... | I posted several times above:This problem persists only on CRS317 running RouterOS (any version).If you don’t want port flapping at all, use SwOS 2.7 or 2.10 (don’t even try 2.8, 2.9).We have many 317 in different configurations with heavy traffic, hundreds of vlans, many of them connected with 10G links to CSS326, CRS... | Follow-up:Up till now all are running without flapping, except for one, once at 3am. Will continue to monitor this.Since after changing to SwOS, the flapping mostly stopped, very good indication that this is a software bug. Should be able to fix. | I posted several times above:This problem persists only on CRS317 running RouterOS (any version).If you don’t want port flapping at all, use SwOS 2.7 or 2.10 (don’t even try 2.8, 2.9).We have many 317 in different configurations with heavy traffic, hundreds of vlans, many of them connected with 10G links to CSS326, CRS... | I just answered on those that ask "did you manage to resolve this problem".Everybody, of course, has own needs and requirements on same hardware - MikroTik must work hard to fix this.p.s. forums like this one is the place to be, before buy some equipment.cheers | RouterOS 6.46 released. In the changelog:*) crs3xx - improved switch-chip resource allocation on CRS317-1G-16S+, CRS309-1G-8S+, CRS312-4C+8XG, CRS326-24S+2Q+ devices;Would this solve the port flapping issue? Has anybody tested it? | RouterOS 6.46 released. In the changelog:*) crs3xx - improved switch-chip resource allocation on CRS317-1G-16S+, CRS309-1G-8S+, CRS312-4C+8XG, CRS326-24S+2Q+ devices;Would this solve the port flapping issue? Has anybody tested it?I noticed this comment too. I therefore upgraded my temporary CRS317 half an hour ago. Sho... | I have CRS328-24P-4S+ and CRS317-1G-16S+ on the shelf. In the next 1-3 days, I will test RouterOS 6.46 on them in 10G. | I have CRS328-24P-4S+ and CRS317-1G-16S+ on the shelf. In the next 1-3 days, I will test RouterOS 6.46 on them in 10G.Don't bother testing: it took 1.5 hours after the upgrade (on both CRS328 and CRS317) for the first flap to occur on my lightly loaded network | I have CRS328-24P-4S+ and CRS317-1G-16S+ on the shelf. In the next 1-3 days, I will test RouterOS 6.46 on them in 10G.Don't bother testing: it took 1.5 hours after the upgrade (on both CRS328 and CRS317) for the first flap to occur on my lightly loaded networkLess than a full day ater: 29 flaps... routerOS 6.46 does no... | The only way to fix this problem is to send your devices back to your distributor! This is not a software bug!!!We have serveral CRS317, CRS328 and the new CRS326 and they worked now without port flappings or other problems.Now they running with RouterOS 6.46 since last friday.regards | The only way to fix this problem is to send your devices back to your distributor! This is not a software bug!!!We have serveral CRS317, CRS328 and the new CRS326 and they worked now without port flappings or other problems.Now they running with RouterOS 6.46 since last friday.regardsLast Friday I received my CRS317 ba... | Hi, want to share small storyI have two CRS326, both devices powered from APC UPS, both CRS's are out of warranty.My problem was:- port flapping on both devices- Both CRS's with DAC cable on SFP+ interfaces won't work at all.- High CPU temperature, 76-78 degrees in celsius.I bought two 24V PSU from Mikrotik, those PSU'... | This is interesting. So the port flapping might be just because of noisy PSU? Should be quite easy to verify, put CRS on external clean linear lab powersupply and see if it fixes the problem, or maybe try adding a few ferrites on the wires from original PSU if that would make a difference.... that is as long as yours i... | I have soldered fan wires directly to PSU 24V outlet. Fan could also produce noise.Unfortunately both CRS are far enough from me, can't do testing with lab PSU.linkdowns.txt - events for few last days, 10/100M speed - should be PC NIC in low power mode, I think.During transition between power modes the network adapter ... | An update from my side:We bought CRS326-24S+2Q to replace the CRS317 devices. Mikrotik support told us the flapping problem between CRS317 and CRS328-20S-4C-4S+ is caused by the CRS317. That was over 1 year ago. They also told us to buy other devices but no CRS317. That means over one year later they still sell the fau... | An update from my side:We bought CRS326-24S+2Q to replace the CRS317 devices. Mikrotik support told us the flapping problem between CRS317 and CRS328-20S-4C-4S+ is caused by the CRS317. That was over 1 year ago. They also told us to buy other devices but no CRS317. That means over one year later they still sell the fau... | Has anybody introduced the new 48port CRS354-48G-4S+2Q+RM switch into the loop?Are there any flapping issues with that one? | HelloOne of my partner gave me the link to that thread when I was looking for a 10G Mikrotik switch.I'm still interested in CRS317 switch. What I need is just the following things:* no crash* RouterOS as I need kind of integration with other things (at least via CLI)* no port flapping* VLAN mapping/translation on each ... | HelloOne of my partner gave me the link to that thread when I was looking for a 10G Mikrotik switch.I'm still interested in CRS317 switch. What I need is just the following things:* no crash* RouterOS as I need kind of integration with other things (at least via CLI)* no port flapping* VLAN mapping/translation on each ... | ...If you only need 10G go for the CRS317: it works well connected to anything but the CRS328 (and possibly the CRS326).Since the repair my CRS317 - CRS328 link has been rock solid too. That connection was the only one with flapping. It is now up since Dec 18 without any issues whatsoever. I am happy....Sounds good.Do ... | ...If you only need 10G go for the CRS317: it works well connected to anything but the CRS328 (and possibly the CRS326).Since the repair my CRS317 - CRS328 link has been rock solid too. That connection was the only one with flapping. It is now up since Dec 18 without any issues whatsoever. I am happy....Sounds good.Do ... | CRS326-24S+2Q+RM @10gbps have the same problem of crs317.. port flapping, link down.. you have 24 ports but you have to do a lottery moving your link, hoping to found a working solution.. (yesterday: 10Gbps Dac to hpe server nic, on port 5 NO LINK, on port 7 flapping link, on port 9 OK).. very disappointed! | We have the same issues CRS328 to servers with 10Gtek X520 cards. 1G is fine, but 10G is unstable. We have 4 brand new CRS328 that do the same thing. Its very disappointing as we bought them so we could switch 10G traffic. Not sure what to do now as we need reliable 10G switching. Any recommendations? | Upgrade to RouterOS to last versionUpdate firmware to last version System->Routerboard->UpgradeRebootSwitch to SwOSUpgrade to last versionUse it with no flapping | Switch to SwOSUse it with no flappingok, you can also buy another vendor switch, but I don't think that it was the question...Hey Mikrotik guys, where are you? | Hey Mikrotik guys, where are you?This is user forum. Support replies in some topics occasionally, but there's not guarantee they reply to your particular message. If you are looking for an official reply you should contact support@ and/or you supplier/distributor directly. | This is user forum. Support replies in some topics occasionally, but there's not guarantee they reply to your particular message. If you are looking for an official reply you should contact support@ and/or you supplier/distributor directly.I think that after one year and an half, many support request, some device repai... | Switch to SwOSUse it with no flappingok, you can also buy another vendor switch, but I don't think that it was the question...Hey Mikrotik guys, where are you?Very funny - for you MikroTik = RouterOS ??!?Guy ask for solution, I gave to him one - it's not universal, but if he need basic switch capabilities it work. | for you MikroTik = RouterOS ??!?onestly, yes. | Using Switch OS is not a solution. Its possibly a bandaid, I don't want to be pushing 10G of data hoping that works. Need a reliable fix. | I'm also having some severe port flapping issues with a bonded 20G (2 DAC SFP Plus cables) between a CRS328 and a CRS317 switch.Need to use RouterOS on both because I would really like to have OSPF running on both switches. (i am aware of the routing performance of these switches, no need to comment on this).So, switch... | I'm also having some severe port flapping issues with a bonded 20G (2 DAC SFP Plus cables) between a CRS328 and a CRS317 switch.Need to use RouterOS on both because I would really like to have OSPF running on both switches. (i am aware of the routing performance of these switches, no need to comment on this).So, switch... | I'm observing the same flapping issueI hae noted that temperature is quite high and FAN are at 0 RPM. Checking with snmp the fan are switched some time.but not enough to cool down the CRS317 with 5 SFP+ installed. the SFP module temperature are between 55 and 60 °C and they start to flap when reach 55 .... and they are... | I have the port flapping problem with my recently purchased CRS328-24P-4S+. The switch has 3 10Gig links plugged in to it. Two of them are 1m dac connections and work fine.The 3rd connection is a lc multimode fiber connection that is 21.5m in length (1.5m patch, 5m patch, and 15m mm fiber between locations). This fiber... | Same problem on config:- CRS317- CRS328- DAC SFP+viewtopic.php?f=3&t=165650&p=815054Mikrotik why you provide BROKEN hardware? | You have to change switch port until you find the correct sequence that not flap.. good luck!Mk switch @10gbps are not reliable at the moment | Hello. I read this post and checked my fiber pop.CCR1009CRS317 where are connected (all via 10G SFP cables), CRS328.on ten switch, one has sfpplus1 flapping as described.I will try changing the DAC then I will RMA the switch.lastest long-term on it. | I have made further investigations.I have 10 CRS328 connected to a CRS317.the only CRS328 that have issues are:5 CRS with 5mt MT DAC, with 5mt MM fibers.a lot of CRS errorstwo of them flaps, the other 4 dont flap.I tried to fix everyone of them at 1G to see if it flaps again or give me errors.I see a lot of FCS errors,... | Quick Question : If I try to switch to SWOs to reduce port flapping, How will I know if it's solved? Is there a log event for port down as in RouterOS? | Quick Question : If I try to switch to SWOs to reduce port flapping, How will I know if it's solved? Is there a log event for port down as in RouterOS?You can check the logs on the CRS328 side.I'm also having port flapping problems on my CRS317 and 4 units of CRS328 pairs. Right now I have the CRS328 connected to a CRS... | CRS326-24G-2S+ 85 degrees steady temperatureSFP+ 10G optical 60 degrees steadyRack temperature 24 degrees steadyCpu usage 1-3%Can´t begin to imagine where temperature will go if cpu usage gets higher | I upgraded the switch with the latest long-term and it no longer flaps!Finger crossed... 12h without a single flap :D | Update, just 1 switch in 4, resumed port flapthe other went flawlessy | Subscribing, I have a CRS326-24G-2S+RM that port flaps on the SFP+ port constantly. I've updated to beta 7 and tried blowing a fan across the SFP+ ports to resolve. I've also swapped ports between the DACs. | I had high hopes for this switch, but looks like I may have to switch to UniFi. I can't have the SFP+ port randomly dropping several times a day. | I solved most of the flaps with latest long-term and latest firmware on it. | I have a CRS328-24P-4S+RM that flaps on two of the four SFP+ ports. My CRS317-1G-16S+RM has no flapping issues. Both switches running SwOs 2.13. | try upgrading the routerboot inside routeros, install the latest bugfix, upgrade routerboot, then reboot with switchos. | try upgrading the routerboot inside routeros, install the latest bugfix, upgrade routerboot, then reboot with switchos.The documentation says:RouterBOOT is responsible for starting RouterOS in RouterBOARD devices.Does it also play a role in booting SwOs? | Yes, because in another changelog, I dont remember where, told to start routerOS, upgrade routerboot, then restart in sw os.I have a 326 that had tx drop, and the suggestion was to upgrade routerboot to the latest, then restart sw0s. now it is working perfectly with 0 tx drops. | Yes, because in another changelog, I dont remember where, told to start routerOS, upgrade routerboot, then restart in sw os.I have a 326 that had tx drop, and the suggestion was to upgrade routerboot to the latest, then restart sw0s. now it is working perfectly with 0 tx drops.Nice, I'm going to try that. Thanks :) | try then let me know.on a CRS326 with 2.12 I had a lot of tx drops.upgraded routerboot from 6.48.3, then put the sw os 2.13problems resolved. | Same issue here, flapping since v6, updated to latest v7, no dice. Still flapping. Solution is to switch to 1gb instead.Screenshot 2022-06-03 131526.png[Router] CCR2004-16G-2S+ RouterOS v7.2.3 Generic SFP-10G-T (fs.com) <---> CAT6 LAN cabling <---> [Switch] CRS309-1G-8S+ RouterOS v7.2.3 Generic SFP-10G-T (fs.com) | Hi guysi know this is an old threadbut we have the same problem with switch CRS328 on the 4 ports sfp+ ports flapping all the time.. if we plug the same gbic for 10gbps on our switch CRS305 it link 10gbps normal with no issue at all and they work normally, but we need to expand and we bought 2 CRS328 switches.. and soo... | latest long-term version RouterOSIt was fixed in 7.4, which is “stable,” not LTS. | CRS328-24P <-> CRS312 with 1m Mikrotik DAC, port flapping every 2 hours. both switch running Stable 7.6, herebelow are the sfp+ 3 and sfp+ 4 link down ( sfp3+ and sfp+4 connected to CRS328 with LAG)
```
[brg3466@CRS312] > log print where message~"combo"
dec/28 02:56:00 bridge,info hardware offloading activated on brid... | CRS328-24P <-> CRS312 with 1m Mikrotik DAC, port flapping every 2 hours. both switch running Stable 7.6Please don't hijack unrelated threads. We are clearly not talking about cases like yours here. That should be obvious even to a newbie: nowhere in the world does "every 2 hours" qualify as "severe."(If you saw this co... | Hi, I've run to the same problem with link going up and down on a port sfp-sfpplus4 of my CRS328-24P-4S+. Enabling and disabling the port helps for some time but that's not the right solution I suppose. I have now stable 6.49.14 version. Do I need to install a development 7.12.1 version, will it help?Thanks. | Guys, I just recently noticed the same port flapping in the logs every few minutes on the RJ45 PC clients sitting on my CRS 328 24p 4s+ with routerOS 7.14.2. (Router board also upgraded with same firmware version). This thread started in 2019. Is there really no fix ever since?For me nothing seems to help. I disabled a... | …the same port flapping…What makes you believe our flapping is your flapping?I'm serious. The "severe" in this thread's title was correct, at the time, and it is now fixed. It wasbadin the early 7.x days.Now it seems any time someone sees more than one flap, it's suddenly "severe" and aaaaaaaa MT sucks!Only the PC comp... | I'm having what I believe to be severe flapping on a CRS305-1G-4S+To my desktop. I've tried swapping out the SFP and the cable.
```
192.168.40.62 Apr 23 19:55:06 interface,info sfp-sfpplus4-tiny link down
192.168.40.62 Apr 23 19:55:08 interface,info sfp-sfpplus4-tiny link up (speed 10G, full duplex)
192.168.40.62... | Hello, i have encountered this problem between my LHG XL 52 AC and CRS309-1G-8S+IN hardware revision 2.This devices are connected only through 1G SFP modules. There is about 150 meters of fiber optic cable. Ethernet port on LHG XL is used only for PoE, there is no traffic, no routing to internet.....Log from LHG XLIssu... | found same problem between netPower 16P PoE CRS318-16P-2S+OUT and LHG XL 52 AC with 10 meters long single mode fiber optic cable.NetPower has 7.13.2 (Second SFP 1G)LHG XL has 7.14.3 (SFP internet, Eth only PoE from different device)Devices tried with multiple SFPs. Currently we also have same problem with original Mikr... | For a workaround I swapped the SFP module for RJ-45 module S+RJ10. It's hot but works fine. For a month now I have not had that flapping problem. | It was fixed in 7.4, which is “stable,” not LTS.7.4 changelog says:switch - disabled second CPU core for CRS328-24P-4S+ device in order to improve SFP+ link stability;What about the CRS317? Was the same lobotomy performed on it as well?Could someone compare the PSU before and after an RMA? Maybe the issue could be reso... | What about the CRS317? Was the same lobotomy performed on it as well?Could someone compare the PSU before and after an RMA? Maybe the issue could be resolved simply by replacing the capacitors with ones of higher capacitance? It makes sense, since in SwOS there were no SFP+ port flapping issues, possibly because the CP... | Hi, CRS326-24G-2S+ still have port flapping, even HW revision r2I have mentioned about this problem in 2019, fife years passed and still the same.CRS326 is unusable at all. | There are no known issues with port flapping in switches that are made for the last ~4-5 years. There were some issues that were addressed around that time. If you see port flapping now - you might have to investigate the other end of the link, powering etc.P.S: please do not crosspost the same message in all topics | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114256 | Thread-1114256 | RouterOS | Hi, first posting here. Been using my Mikrotik router since 2017 with NO issues at all. Love it!Router: Mikrotik RB951G-2HND 5-Port Gigabit Wireless AP 1000mW; MikroTik RouterOS 6.49.6My home has a reliable 100 Mbps+ internet connection. I've confirmed that this full b/w is delivered to my PC (thru my direct-wired Mikr... | 6 | Sure it's not Gmail capping that connection ?150Gb is HUUUUGE !https://support.google.com/a/answer/1071518?hl=en | Thanks for your reply. I was incorrect about the amount of data. It's not 150GB, it is 27GB.I know about the daily data cap. What I'm asking about is the speed of the connection. I know I will max out the allowable data cap but I want to do it quickly, not have it take all day!Thanks again. | IMAP or POP? For IMAP there are sync settings. Usually you just need to sync message headers and not the whole message/attachments. | IMAP or POP? For IMAP there are sync settings. Usually you just need to sync message headers and not the whole message/attachments.Trying to sync messages as well as headers. I want to be able to back up locally, as well as have the option to switch to a different hosting company. | My experience with Gmail and IMAP is that when there are many messages in inbox (several thousand which in my case translates into a couple of gigabytes of space consumed), then sync rate plummets. IMO nothing to do with router. | My experience with Gmail and IMAP is that when there are many messages in inbox (several thousand which in my case translates into a couple of gigabytes of space consumed), then sync rate plummets. IMO nothing to do with router.That's what I suspected. I wanted to hear it from someone more familiar with Mikrotik router... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114260 | Thread-1114260 | RouterOS | Hi!I have a CRS-112-8G-4S-IN and i trying communicate with a network using a SFP model: Planet MFB-F20. This SFP is Fast Ethernet.The switch recognize the SFP port. First, i uncheck the auto-negotiation option and select 100mbps speed, and the sfp port goes to running status.But i can't ping any device in network. In t... | 1 | No, it doesn't appear that model supports fast ethernet SFPs. Seehttps://help.mikrotik.com/docs/spaces/R ... ansceivers | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114269 | Thread-1114269 | RouterOS | Hello, I'm facing a problem with certificate signing on RouterOS 7.16.I have CLIENT-tpl template certificate with defined days valid attribute (e.g. 365days)I have valid CA certificate, not expired.I created and signed certificate with commands:
```
/certificateaddname=vpnuser01 copy-from="CLIENT-tpl"common-name="vpnus... | 7 | You should describe what you're trying to do. From what I understand, you're trying to sign a client certificate from the Routers CA.From the little I played with the Mikrotik so far, this should be working fine.I followed the docs:https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/spaces/R ... rtificatesand more or less copy&pasted:
```
... | It indeed looks like a bug to me. I am also signing the client certificates using a CA on Mikrotik, but using the "correct" way where the private key is generated on the client itself along with a certificate signing request, the request alone is then transferred to the CA Mikrotik and signed there usingcertificate sig... | I can also confirm this bug. I am using version 7.16.1, and I have this behavior.The same procedure applies to another router that runs 7.15.3 and works properly, so the issue is imported in 7.16.1.This is why I am not running the same version in all infrastructure! | Same story here, upgraded my Mikrotik to 7.16.2 and a freshly generated certificate is invalid./certificate print detail shows:invalid-before=1970-01-01 02:00:00invalid-after=1970-01-01 02:00:00Currently, I can't create a VPN connection for our new colleague. I would appreciate any help or workaround. Thanks | I would appreciate any help or workaround.Have you tried the procedure I have suggested in my previous post? | Truth be told, I'm not skilled in certificates. I'm following a setup for an OpenVPN, which creates the certificate (key) directly on the Mikrotik. However, if this doesn't get fixed soon I might need to learn a new way (workaround).EDIT: Reported using Mikrotik service desk (SUP-173239) with a link to this thread. | Hello, The issue is fixed in RouterOS 7.17rc versions | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114281 | Thread-1114281 | RouterOS | I'm wanting to block end users from manually assigning IP addresses to their routers, thereby potentially causing conflicts with my DHCP server. I believe the way to accomplish this is via arp=reply-only on the router interfaces facing the customers, and add-arp=yes on the DHCP server. My question is this - if the inte... | 3 | Only on the bridge, as that's what the IP stack is linked to. The Ethernet interfaces are just member ports of the bridge in this setup. | Only on the bridge, as that's what the IP stack is linked to. The Ethernet interfaces are just member ports of the bridge in this setup.... which also means that access to other networks (including internet) can be controlled in this way. But: communication between devices on same IP subnet (even if passing bridge betw... | Only on the bridge, as that's what the IP stack is linked to. The Ethernet interfaces are just member ports of the bridge in this setup.Got it, this makes sense. Thank you! | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114289 | Thread-1114289 | RouterOS | I have a Mikrotik router RB5009UPr+S+ running RouterOs 7.15 and an Ubiquiti cloud router on a different site.Trying to create a WireGuard VPN tunnel from the Mikrotik to the Ubiquiti. I have enabled WireGuard server on the Ubituiti and added two clients, one for my android phone and one for the Mikrotik.Here is the con... | 4 | I have plenty of WG tunnels between MT gear and other stuff (Linux, Windows, Android, ...).It works.It is not impossible nor difficult if you use the correct settings.Having only TX and no RX is normal.Wireguard always tries to send. Only when you see something coming back, then you know it works.Since you do not show ... | Based on your presentation please add firewall filter to allow UDP 51821 to a "suitable location" before the input drop line. I hope this might help you to resolve the problems. | So the ubiquiti is the Server Peer for handshake, So why this bizarre setup?Here is the configuration from the Ubiquiti[Interface]PrivateKey = privkeyAddress = 192.168.9.2/32DNS = 192.168.9.1It should be[Interface]PrivateKey = privkeyAddress = 192.168.9.1/32DNS = 192.168.9.1OR[Interface]PrivateKey = privkeyAddress = 19... | Thanks for the replies, I have learned a lot and now I finally got it working!Im no expert in networking, Im a developer but I have some experience in networking and I run a small homelab with some VLANs and stuff..The config file I had was correct (the one in the first post in this thread), it was exported from the Ub... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114322 | Thread-1114322 | RouterOS | Is there any other way to use a VPN even if my ISP is blocked Wireguard?I have tried to change port 443, 8295 for wireguard but it's not connectingWireGuard is not connectingfound this error in logs:wireguard1: [test] KQf3CazJ+nfylMl+Nnajsfnjsd TUT6yoyX/xbxPNzEE=: Handshake for peer did not complete after 5 seconds, re... | 20 | Try BTH.https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/spaces/R ... ck+To+Home | If the ISP is blocking wireguard, the fact that you have tried numerous ports tells me that they are checking DPI, into the weeds to see the type of traffic.Therefore suggesting BTH is fruitless.However, if the lack of connection is eithera. operator config errorb. no access to public IPThen BTH may help alleviate both... | I have a public IP on my Router.Wireguard was working fine before ISP changed its policies.but now the Wireguaurd is not connecting. Sometimes it connected but suddenly disconnected.I also tried "bth" but it is also blocked.Please help me if there is any other wayThanks | ikev2 (ipsec) is well supported, and there are fairly good examples around.https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/spaces/R ... enticationThis is more industrial, so perhaps less likely to be dropped.But if your ISP doesn't want you running VPN's. You will struggle. | Or change ISP ?A party blocking VPN is not worth to receive your money. | Or change ISP ?A party blocking VPN is not worth to receive your money.actually all ISPs and organizations blocking vpn | Yup, it's not a matter of switching the ISP, it's a matter of switching the country. AmneziaWG seems to be successful in addressing this type of issue, but you need a Mikrotik that supports containers or a completely different hardware. Depending on the country, it may or may not be enough. | Yup, it's not a matter of switching the ISP, it's a matter of switching the country. AmneziaWG seems to be successful in addressing this type of issue, but you need a Mikrotik that supports containers or a completely different hardware. Depending on the country, it may or may not be enough.any advice on what I need to ... | SSTP looks almost like a normal HTTPS connection but it is relatively slow. The initial packets of all other VPN protocols are quite distinctive so easy to spot using DPI and therefore easy to block. AmneziaWG targets exactly this. | SSTP looks almost like a normal HTTPS connection but it is relatively slow. The initial packets of all other VPN protocols are quite distinctive so easy to spot using DPI and therefore easy to block. AmneziaWG targets exactly this.Scenario is thatI have Mikrotik CHR on Digital Ocean. We are using CHR as a WireGuard Ser... | I do know people who run containers on CHRs running in the cloud, because it is simpler than to set up a separate virtual machine there. But keeping a CHR only as a host for a single container would make little sense so maybe spawning a dedicated Debian machine may be a better choice for you - I don't have enough infor... | We have installed the WG application on Android and iPhone, ISP blocks this and we can't establish a connection with CHR-WireGuard Server.In this case How I can deploy AmneziaWG?orI need to deploy any other machine for AmneziaWG on Cloud?1. Leave server as is, and try Amnezia client for smartphone. Amnezia client needs... | We have installed the WG application on Android and iPhone, ISP blocks this and we can't establish a connection with CHR-WireGuard Server.In this case How I can deploy AmneziaWG?orI need to deploy any other machine for AmneziaWG on Cloud?1. Leave server as is, and try Amnezia client for smartphone. Amnezia client needs... | What speeds do you achieve? Are you sure, you have full tunnel and not maybe some split tunnelig? Because AmneziaWG isn't realy much different then ordinary WG, so anything, that worked there, should also work with AmneziaWG.¸It could also be MTU issue. Many times, when some sites don't load it's a MTU issue. | What speeds do you achieve? Are you sure, you have full tunnel and not maybe some split tunnelig? Because AmneziaWG isn't realy much different then ordinary WG, so anything, that worked there, should also work with AmneziaWG.¸It could also be MTU issue. Many times, when some sites don't load it's a MTU issue.There is a... | Well, i was asking for something like speedtest.net results.Try with this in firewall mangle rule. See if it fixes anything.
```
addaction=change-mss chain=forward comment="Clamp MTU to PMTU"disabled=yesnew-mss=clamp-to-pmtu passthrough=yes protocol=tcp tcp-flags=syn
---
``` | ...without thedisabled=yesof course. | MISSING!!Besides the disabled=yes error, where is the interface?designated on that rule.Try/ip firewall mangleadd action=change-mss chain=forward comment="Clamp MSS to PMTU for Outgoing packets" new-mss=clamp-to-pmtuout-interface=wireguard1passthrough=yes protocol=tcp tcp-flags=synIf you dont see any difference with th... | I only copied it from my 5009. I'm not using that rule right now and that is why it's disabled. I found it in such form (without interface) somewhere on the internet or even maybe on this forum.Thanks for fixing it. | MISSING!!Besides the disabled=yes error, where is the interface?designated on that rule.Try/ip firewall mangleadd action=change-mss chain=forward comment="Clamp MSS to PMTU for Outgoing packets" new-mss=clamp-to-pmtuout-interface=wireguard1passthrough=yes protocol=tcp tcp-flags=synIf you dont see any difference with th... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114339 | Thread-1114339 | RouterOS | Hello, I've just recently upgraded to a CRS312-4C+8XG and CRS326-24G-2S+. The last one should not play a role here. I come from CRS305 with 6.49 and there, all was good.As 10Gbe units, i only have a TrueNAS (X550) and a Mac Studio. Additionally, there is a 5Gbase-T Proxmox (aqc111 so limited to 3.5Gbe per design).With ... | 1 | nearly forgot this one. If i remember correctly, i solved it eventually after reading the common problem if you put the dedicated management to the bridge. This is then hitting on the CPU, thus reducing speed, in the above config this line:add bridge=bridge comment=defconf interface=ether9https://help.mikrotik.com/docs... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114359 | Thread-1114359 | RouterOS | Hello everyone, I found the process of setting up the wireguard client extremely complicated. So here I am after about 8 hours of struggling.1. My wireguard server is working and it took me 30 seconds to set up a windows client and verify that the connection was not the problem.2. My setup in the router OS seems to be ... | 4 | Anyone? | This is not paid support keep your underwear on, be patient!!A few things, 1. what is this guest network all about, its only defined in firewall address list ??2. Allowed IPs is incorrect. if the MT is the Server peer for handshake, the client peers EACH should be assigned as separate peers, with their respective wireg... | Hi! Thank you for looking into this issue!1. what is this guest network all about, its only defined in firewall address list ??Nothing, it doesn't exist yet2. Allowed IPs is incorrect. if the MT is the Server peer for handshake, the client peers EACH should be assigned as separate peers, with their respective wireguard... | Ahh it was not clear that was the case, your first post mentioned you had setup it up as a server.Misunderstood.Okay with that in mind............1. The big mistake noted previously is still biting you in the ass here.MISSINGis wireguard interface address!!2. This is nonsense.........there is only one subnet --> add ad... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114360 | Thread-1114360 | RouterOS | I have a bit of a lab network setup. I have a small pool of public IP addresses that I'm providing to individual subnets behind my router (RB3011). The main thing I wanted was for each subnet to have it's own separate public IP when it connects out. I did this previously with mangle rules, but that had some limitations... | 3 | I think your missing a /routing/rule that says traffic NOT to internet should use "main" routing table (i.e. the 0.0.0.0/0 route, which is represented as min-prefix=0). This rule should be list FIRST - before the WAN-per-interface route rules - otherwise local traffic is ALSO route to WAN's default gateway, which won't... | Right on! That was exactly what I needed. Pinging between networks as expected now. Thank you! | Good to hear. It's a bit confusing at first... FWIW rules run from top to bottom, first match wins. So when you create a broad rule (i.e. all traffic on an interface), it does mean send ALL traffic, including local ones, to the specific routing table=. Why adding your local routes as rule to "main" is needed (which the... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114363 | Thread-1114363 | RouterOS | Hello, I'm using a Mikrotik Router connected to a Zyxel VMG3006-D70A Modem to connect to Deutsche Telekom.PPPoe Client has been configured to use the necessary VLAN ID 7. This part seems to work, as the client establishes the connection and gets an IP address. After establishing connection the default routes do also ex... | 13 | hello, let us try some simple step first,
```
/interfacelist memberaddcomment=defconfinterface=bridge list=LANaddcomment=defconfinterface=ether1 list=WANtry to include your pppoe and vlan 7 interface to list=wan.hth.
---
``` | hello, let us try some simple step first,
```
/interfacelist memberaddcomment=defconfinterface=bridge list=LANaddcomment=defconfinterface=ether1 list=WANtry to include your pppoe and vlan 7 interface to list=wan.hth.Hello,Adding eth1, pppoe and vlan7 interface to list=WAN does not change behavior. Still unable to ping ... | ok. let us continue withip firewall filter print detailsip firewall nat print detailsip addresses print detailsip route print detailsplease put those in separate code tag. it's better to see those output first rather than the config. | Here it is:firewall filters
```
Flags:X-disabled,I-invalid;D-dynamic0D;;;special dummy rule to show fasttrack counters
chain=forward action=passthrough1;;;defconf:accept established,related,untracked
chain=input action=accept connection-state=established,related,untracked log=nolog-prefix=""2;;;defconf:drop... | ```
chain=input action=dropin-interface-list=!LAN log=nolog-prefix="!LAN"that part - try to change its action=accept.if it's working - then you need to track down how to secure that !lan
```
```
2D79.224.52.103/3262.155.242.73pppoe-t-vdsland that pppoe was inside vlan 7. you don't have ip address for your vlan hence y... | Code: Select allchain=input action=drop in-interface-list=!LAN log=no log-prefix="!LAN"that part - try to change its action=accept.Changing action to accept didn't change behavior --> still no ping possible (from router and LAN)Code: Select all2 D 79.224.52.103/32 62.155.242.73 pppoe-t-vdsland that pppoe was inside vla... | Adding eth1, pppoe and vlan7ok. now... exclude eth1 and vlan 7 from address -list wan. | ok. now... exclude eth1 and vlan 7 from address -list wan.now there's only pppoe left in interface-list wan --> no change at all, ping fails/traceroute gets stuck on router | Can the router itself ping outside?Maybe also a Telekom issue...Edit:
```
/ip routeadddisabled=nodistance=1dst-address=192.168.176.0/24gateway=ether2 routing-table=main scope=30suppress-hw-offload=no\
target-scope=10adddisabled=nodistance=1dst-address=192.168.178.0/24gateway=192.168.176.1routing-table=main scope=30... | Can the router itself ping outside?No ping to internet addresses possible from routerI see no default route 0.0.0.0/0 pointing to the next hop?!Default route gets added when pppoe is connected and points to pppoe, so that is why it is not part of the initially exported config, ip route print on router shows the followi... | ok... now try to disable that hairpin0 ;;; hairpin natchain=srcnat action=masquerade src-address=192.168.177.0/24 dst-address=192.168.177.0/24 log=no log-prefix="" | 1. /interface list memberadd comment=defconf interface=bridge list=LANadd comment=defconf interface=ether1 list=WANadd interface=pppoe-t-vdsllist=WAN2. Do not use same names for different parts of the configAND REMOVE SERVER ADDRESSit does not belong here!!/ip dhcp-serveradd address-pool=WTC_PRIVinterface=bridge lease-... | now there's only pppoe left in interface-list wan --> no change at all, ping fails/traceroute gets stuck on router1. ping your gateway ip (and 1.1.1.1 or 8.8.8.from the router with src addr of your pppoe ip. if succeed then, 2. ping your gateway ip (and 1.1.1.1 or 8.8.8.from the router with the src addr of your vlan 7.... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114372 | Thread-1114372 | RouterOS | My ISP assigns a reserved /56 delegation based on the IPv6 DHCP client using the DUID of their CPE and IA_PD ID 1. I’m trying to replicate this on my RB5009 and am most of the way there, but have hit a roadblock.I have managed to set the system DUID on the RB5009 by editing a backup and restoring it, though I would pre... | 1 | I have the same problem. I wrote MikroTik Support that the logic used to check the IAID does not take the "overwrite" using DHCP option (3, 25) into account. Which is (IMHO) a bug. My ISP only answers the DHCP request when IAID is 0x01. On my router's WAN interface (ether1) it's 0x02. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114402 | Thread-1114402 | RouterOS | I'm investigating routing performance on CHR, I have the P10 license. Running the bandwidth test to 127.0.0.1 to measure the internal performance I seem to be getting around 10 Gbit. Is this the P10 license preventing higher speeds?In other words; do I need to upgrade to an unlimited license to see the "true potential"... | 4 | Perhaps read the docs before asking?https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/spaces/R ... enseLevelsP10 (perpetual-10) license level allows CHR to run indefinitely.It is limited to 10Gbps upload per interface | Perhaps read the docs before asking?https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/spaces/R ... enseLevelsP10 (perpetual-10) license level allows CHR to run indefinitely.It is limited to 10Gbps upload per interfaceHello. I have, both when purchasing the license, and when looking into this. I am well aware of the limitations of the P10... | make a new VM, request a free trial for the P-unlimited license, test it. Trial is free and you can check any limits | make a new VM, request a free trial for the P-unlimited license, test it. Trial is free and you can check any limitsThat is a good idea, I'll do that. Thanks | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114424 | Thread-1114424 | RouterOS | I try to repair mikrotik via netinstall, but i'am seeing this error:sudo ./netinstall-cli -v -r -a 192.168.88.3 routeros-smips-6.49.13.npkVersion: 7.16.2(2024-11-26 13:15:20)Will reset to default configUsing interface enp0s20u2Using interface enp0s20u2Waiting for Link-UP on enp0s20u2Waiting for RouterBOARD...Can't Neti... | 3 | This is VERY odd indeed ?!And did you try simply using the mips package as it indicates ?Because what strikes me as equally odd, is that same QCA9533 CPU is used in mAP Lite and cAP Lite and those ARE mips devices. Not SMIPS. | This is VERY odd indeed ?!And did you try simply using the mips package as it indicates ?Because what strikes me as equally odd, is that same QCA9533 CPU is used in mAP Lite and cAP Lite and those ARE mips devices. Not SMIPS.Sorry, do you mean MIPSBE? But in specification an architectury of hap lite is SMIPS. Also i ha... | /system resource printon a hap lite tc I have gives:cpu: MIPS 24Kc v7.4architecture name: smips | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114441 | Thread-1114441 | RouterOS | My network infrastructure is as follows:3 ISP with fixed public IPs- ISP 1 connected via a PPPOE connection- ISP 2 and 3 connected to the router via the DHCP client of the router (the IP is fixed on the DHCP server of the box)The ISP 3 box does not allow the configuration in Bridge mode, so the NAT is configured so tha... | 6 | SUMMARY Wireguard is not the main problem!!1. Why do you lie about the facts??Quote: "On the router:4 vlans with each a specific IP addressing.Bridges are not used.IP/SEC configuration IKE2 is not used."From config:/interfacebridgeadd name=bridge_EURAFIBREadd name=bridge_FREEadd name=bridge_LAN_MANAGEMENTadd name=bridg... | 1. Which WAN will customers use to acccess your wireguard?2. your firewall rules need workfor example you have two rules that are redundant.-->add action=drop chain=input comment="WANs : protection DNS" dst-port=53 \in-interface-list=Liste_WANs protocol=tcpadd action=drop chain=input comment="WANs : protection DNS" dst... | Hello Anav, First thank you for taking the time to answer me.Each advice is good to take.I did not lie about the facts: I carried out many configuration tests, and I had previously created bridges.But as you can see, they are not used!DHCP management on bridges was too complex to manage in comparison with VLANS.To brin... | @alpha, Handshake is not visible in Winbox, but there is sometimes RX and TX traffic.the simplest way is just to look at the state of your wg interface whether is up or down - at your winboxThe customer (Android) indicates that the connection is established, but impossible to have access to the WAN.did you mean - you w... | Hi, The objective is that users connect to VPN to access external servers (VPS) with the public IP of the ISP.The firewall of these servers allows access only to this public IP.The Wireguard interface is up, and there is sometimes a little traffic.The customer indicates that it is connected, but yet there is no interne... | Without a diagram I have no clue what your network looks like.Are these customers remotely connecting to your MT router to use your internet?Are the customers behind the MT router and connecting to your CHR in the cloud to get internetAre the customers behind the MT router and connecting to your connection to a third p... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114453 | Thread-1114453 | RouterOS | Can it act as switch only, without routing, vlan ect ?. | 6 | Sure.That's how it default starts.You only need to look at the IP address, rest of config default starts as a pure switch (because ... that's what it is !). | Look at IP adress?, you mean set on them IP in range of what router passes ? | Yes.Surely your default subnet is not going to be 192.168.88.0/24, is it ? | Yes, alright, that i will config proper way. | Yes it can act as a router but the routing throughput is not the same as switching throughput. | Another option is the CRS326 is dual boot, so it can be configured to use SwitchOS. Makes a great fully managed switch. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114458 | Thread-1114458 | RouterOS | We are working with some customers where the regional NMO will soon phase out all public IPv4 addresses to be replaced by CGNAT. The NMO has implemented IPv6, though only dynamic /64 prefixes are available. To address this potential issue, we would like to prioritize IPv6 connectivity on all affected WireGuard peers as... | 7 | This is a problem with the underlying source code of the WireGuard vanilla middleware client application software.You need to request the devs of the vanilla client to fix this. IPv6 has never been preferred. | There is no "vanilla" except for the actual tunnel protocol. The resolver and wg peer setup process is implementation-specific and you can make it work using standard configuration settings on a regular Linux machine.However, in this case I am looking for a solution for MikroTik boxes where RoS seems to lack user contr... | Noticed the same issue today while setting up a WG tunnel. Both sides have only public IPv6 (although dynamic), IPv4 is CGNAT. The WG peer configuration prefers IPv4 (private, CGNAT) and fails to connect.There should be a way to prefer IPv6. | I am also facing the same issue. My ISP has GCNAT but provides ipv6 addresses.Inside my lan I have a linux machine, and I managed to connect to the wireguard interface through it's ipv6 public address (from my phone using mobile internet service). To do that I wrote a custom python script to update the hostname I got f... | You can schedule a script similar to this:
```
:localpeer_domain"my.domain.net";:localpeer_comment"XYZ";:localnew_addr[:resolve type=ipv6 domain-name="$peer_domain"]/interfacewireguard peers;:foreachpeerin=[find comment="$peer_comment"]do={:localold_addr[getnumber=$peer endpoint-address];:if($new_addr!=$old_addr)do={:l... | Thank you for the script, but I believe it's the other way around.I am connecting to the mikrotik. For that reason I do not add any endpoints to the peers on my mikrotik wireguard interface.But I need to add the ipv6 public address of mikrotik pppoe interface as an endpoint to the peer that I have added at my phone (th... | Oh, in that case you need a simple script on the router that uses /tool fetch and dynv6.com Update APIhttps://dynv6.com/docs/apis#updateto automatically update the DNS entry whenever the DHCPv6 Client gets a new prefix. You can try something like this (I've adapted from my script with another DDNS provider, not dynv6.c... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114469 | Thread-1114469 | RouterOS | Hi, I have a strange issue when using IPSEC - once connection is established at least once, and then terminated (regardless of reason), attempt to look at "Installed SAs" just hangs all IPSEC related functions, UI becomes unusable, CLI is responsive but hangs on anything below
```
/ip/ipsecOnce this happens, one CPU co... | 1 | Hi, I have observed similar behaviour on CCR2116. Trying to display "Installed SA" tab causes IPSec crash. RouterOS drops all phase1 and phase2 connections, new connections either cannot be established or they are dropped after a few seconds. The difference is that on CCR2116 IPSec does not become totally unresponsive,... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114479 | Thread-1114479 | RouterOS | Daer all, I have tried so many times. but port forwarding is not working on DigitalOcean.I want to forward port8295, 8296, 8297, 8298.But on the port checker against my public IP, it shows 8295, 8296 is blocked and 8297, 8298 is opened.but when I changed the CHR 8295 port to my Winbox then it worked for Winbox access.b... | 4 | No idea what digital ocean is, so your first statement is meaningless.Is this a server on your LAN, is it a server in the cloud that you control, etc etc..Technically:Why are you port forwarding winbox ports?? Do you not know that winbox is a router service and not a LAn service??Security: Why are you port forwarding w... | Accessing winbox is done byFIRSTconnecting VIA wireguard to the CHR on digital ocean.Then use winbox on pc, or winbox app on smartphoneFrom there you can reacha. the MT router behind NAT to config the routerb. the subnets behind NAT to access servers.CHR DEVICE:add chain=forward action=accept comment="relay remote peer... | No idea what digital ocean is, so your first statement is meaningless.Is this a server on your LAN, is it a server in the cloud that you control, etc etc..Technically:Why are you port forwarding winbox ports?? Do you not know that winbox is a router service and not a LAn service??Security: Why are you port forwarding w... | I dont care about AWS or digital ocean, the CHR as you stated on a cloud server simply works. Stick with that. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114489 | Thread-1114489 | RouterOS | I have two sites connected by two Mikrotiks through an IP tunnel over IPsec.In Site1, I have several LANs that can successfully communicate with LAN1 in Site2.Now I need the LANs in Site1 to connect to the remote IPsec sites of Site2 (Azure, GCP, Branch1, Branch2).How can I achieve this?Could I use some kind of NAT?the... | 3 | on site 1 router you nead add ipsec policy witch dst net of azure and the reverse to site 2nat it is not necessary if you set correct routing in azure | Thank you very much for your response.That is the logical solution, but I cannot implement it because I don't control Azure, GCP, or the other offices, so I have to use the output already established by Site2.Could I use a NAT at Site2 so that when something destined for Azure comes in, it changes the address to the LA... | ensures 1<-->2 site connection via ipsec witch azure networks policies, and then use NAT on router site2 like:EXAMPLE-1/ip routeadd dst-address=10.10.10.0/24 (network azure) gateway=1.1.1.1 (ISP GW) pref-src=192.168.1.1 (LAN mikrotik ip/site2) routing-table=main/ip firewall natadd action=masquerade chain=srcnat dst-add... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114490 | Thread-1114490 | RouterOS | From your own product page "If you are a rather large ISP, dealing with dynamic routing, massive BGPs, complex firewall rules, and intricate quality of service configurations..This is the right device for you"I'm sorry Mikrotik, we are not seeing this and are currently in the process of rolling back to the CCR1072sThe ... | 11 | The text from product page you quoted was there before L3HW became available on CCR2216.It seems that L3HW got broken in latest stable ROS (7.16.2) ... it's likely it runs out of routes memory. And when using device "with several full tables", this likely gets triggered much faster than when used as simple router in th... | Disabling it hits 100% CPU very fast - kernel panic reboots etc etc !! | We are in the process of deploying 4 CCR2216s as "backbone" routers, replacing the aging 1072s.They are basically used as L3 switches, no firewall (just basic input firewall), no nat, no conntrack, single table. Just several fast ports with traffic going trough, connecting the border with the access layer.They do OSPF ... | We enabled "full" L3HW. After ~24 hours, a dozen or so of these customers started calling and complaining they were not getting traffic. On inspection we were seeing something like in main table:DAoH 0.0.0.0 -> sfpADAoH 10.0.0.0/24 -> sfpADAoH 10.0.0.42/32 -> sfpBFor all these customers, despite the /32 being active in... | L3HW has its limits, and I don't think it can take a full table face on.These devices, if I understood them correctly, are more "core devices" than "edge devices". L3HW will (would? I'm not using it, and looks like some problem cropped up) do wonders with "few" routes.Take a look athttps://help.mikrotik.com/docs/spaces... | CCR2216 can do hardware offload to 120k IPv4 route4s and about 20k IPv6 routes.Shouldn't it fall back to CPU routing? You don't get to do large amount of traffic with more than 120k destinations at once, so routing the least use with the CPU should be okay-ish.Anyways, if I understand what sirbryan is saying, he gets L... | CCR2216 can do hardware offload to 120k IPv4 route4s and about 20k IPv6 routes.Shouldn't it fall back to CPU routing? You don't get to do large amount of traffic with more than 120k destinations at once, so routing the least use with the CPU should be okay-ish.It does fall back. But, then, it's much slower than hardwar... | We considered the 2216 as border routers for several months, and always pushed the decision back due to the issues we were seeing with BGP and v7 in other, smaller, set ups.In the end, we ditched them as borders in favour of refurb MX204s. But we hoped to use them as backbone/core. This is proving a challenge, too, alt... | There is also still no HW support for VXLAN on 2216, although the switch ASIC would support it.L3HW has issues, same for BGP. ROS on CCR2216 is not ready for prime time.But it got DLNA support while routing is still broken. Why not use it as a DLNA server? | More specifically:I am running L3HW offload on several CRS300's, using them as site or edge (customer-facing) routers. They work great, unless they have diverse routes with equal cost. In that case, they will eventually get confused and routes will get "stuck" going out the wrong port, despite changes in the routing ta... | Thanks, sirbryan, that’s some interesting information.We have been facing issues during tests with the specific brand of DWDM sfps we are using, that went away with 7.17. And that’s why we’re introducing a system with rc software in production. So going to older versions could be an issue, here.The equal cost path thin... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114494 | Thread-1114494 | RouterOS | Sawadee...It's been 3 weeks of battle finding solution and error to our problem. We have 1gb internet cnn from our ISP. Bandwidth test inside the ccr1016 shows 600-800mbps but when using speedtest on pc on the classrooms get 90-150mbps. Wifi is worst like 2-15mbps in 2.4ghz using hap ac.Please help usHere is my config>... | 4 | I see a 100Mbps speed interface. Can you force it to 1Gb interface? | I am on my phone and it is hard to read long configs but it looks like:You are missing the established and FastTrack rulesYou are doing a ton of l7 matchingBoth affect the throughput. There may be way to fix some of it. Will check. | See many static DHCP reservations so it implies that there are many possible users transfering during speedtest. Are you sure that the missing 300Mb is not consumed somehow by others? | Sawadee...It's been 3 weeks of battle finding solution and error to our problem. We have 1gb internet cnn from our ISP. Bandwidth test inside the ccr1016 shows 600-800mbps but when using speedtest on pc on the classrooms get 90-150mbps. Wifi is worst like 2-15mbps in 2.4ghz using hap ac.Please help usYour firewall conf... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114502 | Thread-1114502 | RouterOS | Hi Everyone, I'm running an L2TP/IPSec VPN, and see different IP's try to connect in my log.respond new phase 1 (Identity Protection): Mikrotik_IP[500]<=>x.x.x.x[12345]x.x.x.x failed to get valid proposal.x.x.x.x failed to pre-process ph1 packet (side: 1, status 1).x.x.x.x phase1 negotiation failed.I do have a filter r... | 12 | Should you not be using dst-port rather than src-port? | Also, as IPsec uses UDP, won't the addresslist be filled constantly regardless if the tunnel establishes or not? | Also, as IPsec uses UDP, won't the addresslist be filled constantly regardless if the tunnel establishes or not?True, but the tries come from a specific range 1.2.3.x so I can identify it that way.I'm still thinking of another way, without port knocking or parsing... will be continued | The source address is not authenticated with UDP. If you add IPs to a block list based solely on a UDP packet, then you risk your network breaking horribly when someone spoofs a bunch of popular IPs such as DNS servers, Google, Facebook, etc. | KitMikro, were you able to improve your firewall filter to stop this kind of attacks? I'm also getting them.Thanks and Best Regards, Ricardo | KitMikro, were you able to improve your firewall filter to stop this kind of attacks? I'm also getting them.Thanks and Best Regards, RicardoIt seems they connect from a range of Ipaddresses like 1.2.3.X so I've added a rule to drop all connections on UDP ports 500 and 4500 from 1.2.3.0/24Also added a Knock on door rule... | KitMikro, were you able to improve your firewall filter to stop this kind of attacks? I'm also getting them.Thanks and Best Regards, RicardoIt seems they connect from a range of Ipaddresses like 1.2.3.X so I've added a rule to drop all connections on UDP ports 500 and 4500 from 1.2.3.0/24Also added a Knock on door rule... | KitMikro, were you able to improve your firewall filter to stop this kind of attacks? I'm also getting them.Thanks and Best Regards, RicardoIt seems they connect from a range of Ipaddresses like 1.2.3.X so I've added a rule to drop all connections on UDP ports 500 and 4500 from 1.2.3.0/24Also added a Knock on door rule... | Thank you very much KitMikro, we will try this method that you recommend us! | Thanks for the info KitMikro; this works for me too. Below is what I used; handy for those people who don't use ipsec at all:
```
/ip firewall filter add chain=input protocol=udp dst-port=500,4500 in-interface=WAN action=dropPretty blunt code just to drop anything trying to come in on those ports. I can see 9 blocked p... | Here is solution of our problemhttps://github.com/Onoro/Mikrotik | I've been annoyed by this very issue for quite a while.Recently I decided to make/ip firewall filter add action=passthrough chain=input protocol=udp dst-port=500 log=yesrule (next to accept established ofc) to investigate.Apparently, those pesky IKE requests come in low packet size, usually below 400 bytes, while valid... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114504 | Thread-1114504 | RouterOS | So, I'm in the midst of implementing monitoring solution, Security Onion OS. Now, my plan is to monitor specific Ethernet ports on Mikrotik via port mirroring.The Problem:The system is very tight and allows only few things (by design). Now, if I connect Security Onion OS and the 'seniors' into mirror sources, everythin... | 1 | If using port mirroring, the 'source mirror' is sending copy of packets to 'target mirror' Ethernet. Now, can 'target mirror' also send packets back to mikrotik? basically, does 'mirror traffics' do both way traffic or is it just sending copies of packets one way?Did you find answer to that? I'm interested too if that ... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114514 | Thread-1114514 | RouterOS | i havd same message in logo list. Can any one help me to end this problemipv4 neighbor table overflow, please consider increasing max-neighbor-entriesAnd i dont connect any thing as dvr. | 2 | Hi, V7.16.1IP Settings.There are 2 items, the max neighbor entries and Arp TimeoutYou could increase the max neighbor entries value or possibly decrease the Arp Timeout value.(The current default Arp Timeout value appears to be 30S, I would not go below that) | Thanks i do show that 2 items and setting it. As you tell me after that i send you the result. | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114515 | Thread-1114515 | RouterOS | if I have 2 routers, with a cable in between them. and this cable is an access port, could I use qinq to pass vlan through the port? Currently I am using eoip over the interface added to a bridge. But this is a local link, 1gb ptp fiber, its only in the access mode. is there any other option than using a vpn here?from ... | 7 | Are there multiple VLANs on the bridges currently interconnected using EoIP? If yes, it indeed does make sense to use an additional VLAN tag instead of EoIP, as that requires less overhead than EoIP both byte-wise and CPU-wise. If the "access" ports of the routers that are interconnected using the dark fiber are not me... | Are there multiple VLANs on the bridges currently interconnected using EoIP?thanks for the reply. Yes, and I have 2 RB4011iGS+ specifically for this link.All of the ports on these 2 devices are trunking (bridging w/no vlan filter) with the exception of just 1 port, which is the in access mode. this port comes from a se... | Sorry, I did not understand from your OP that the link between the two 4011 was an active one, i.e. that the two 4011s are not connected just by dark fiber but there is some other equipment between them. If so, it depends on your contract with the service provider what type of traffic you can send through it, as in the... | thanks a lot for your help, i think i see what ive misunderstood; i wasnt thinking of qinq as an extension to the vlan, rather, i was considering it more like a vpn. loosely put, the qinq is my feature in vlanning and not yours (if you are a client to me i can allow you to trunk). In my case, i am the client and the qi... | thanks a lot for your help, i think i see what ive misunderstood; i wasnt thinking of qinq as an extension to the vlan, rather, i was considering it more like a vpn. loosely put, the qinq is my feature in vlanning and not yours (if you are a client to me i can allow you to trunk). In my case, i am the client and the qi... | I wonder if Mikrotik is considering supporting selective qinq in its next ROS releases. Is this a hardware problem? | That would be great! | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114531 | Thread-1114531 | RouterOS | TLS 1.3 has been around for quite some time now. Why does RouterOS still not support it? | 11 | Because there is no urge for Mikrotik to support it. As long TLS 1.2 is not deprecated/discouraged as 1.0/1.1 - Mikrotik won't move. | Even my brother printer I just bought has tls 1.3 LOL. What a farce. | Because there is no urge for Mikrotik to support it. As long TLS 1.2 is not deprecated/discouraged as 1.0/1.1 - Mikrotik won't move.Yes yes, but why? I’d think they would want to ensure RouterOS supports the current security standards at a minimum.My Ubiquiti EdgeRouters, which haven’t gotten a real software release in... | We don't know. | When a company fails to communicate properly, it is left to others to speculate.This is where MTs marketing and communications director is a complete failure.my guess --> LazyWhat i hope its not --> lack the technical competence to code it in. | if they dont use any of the common libraries like openssl, then it is maybe quite an effort for Mikrotik. They have to set priorities. Not laziness. We know ROS lacks many features and I guess support for TLS 1.3 is not crucial - now. | Yes, bit of tongue in cheek there, but concur, lack of resourcesto ensure the router is up to date.This is not like wifi7 which entails buying new hardware and adapting etc......... and also waiting for optimal pricing, new kid off the block has highest initial costs until they are mass produced. | As long as TLS 1.2 is still considered secure and ROS supports secure ciphers, I couldn't care less. Everything else is compliance BS. | From my reading, tls 1.3 is a no-brainer. | As long as TLS 1.2 is still considered secure and ROS supports secure ciphers, I couldn't care less. Everything else is compliance BS.It's is not just about security, TLS 1.3 have more optimal handshake, less round trips. | As long as TLS 1.2 is still considered secure and ROS supports secure ciphers, I couldn't care less. Everything else is compliance BS.It's is not just about security, TLS 1.3 have more optimal handshake, less round trips.True. But when it comes to managing your router/switch/AP, how many hundreds of connection inits pe... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114549 | Thread-1114549 | RouterOS | Hello, I've recently bought two SXT 6 and have linked them wirelessly together (Bridge and Station-Bridge).i've nothing configured, only the bridge and added ports to them, and ofcourse the wireless interfaces.My problem is, that after every few hours, the ethernet will have high latency (delay) when i ping from anywhe... | 1 | /tool graphing interfaceadd/tool graphing queueadd/tool graphing resourceaddread logsafter error check resource utilization | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114555 | Thread-1114555 | RouterOS | Hello, I have a problem with SNMP via WireGuard, I have launched a Zabbix server on my home network and I have 5-6 Mikrotiks on the local network and it intercepts them without any problems, however, on my two remote points, which are via WG, the server does not intercept them. I have ping from Zabbix to the routers an... | 1 | you probably don't have the correct networks added on the client side/interface wireguard peersadd allowed-address=.........or a convergent community in snmp/snmp communityadd addresses=.... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114561 | Thread-1114561 | RouterOS | Hello, I have CHR on DigitalOcean. this is Site-AandSite-B is behind the NATCan you please help me with the configuration of how to configure Wireguard between Site-A and Site-B?I have tried but unable to handshake tunnelRegards | 2 | Sure setup up the CHR as the server peer for handshake, and set up the ground router behind nat at the client peer for handshake.many examples in the forum | Sure setup up the CHR as the server peer for handshake, and set up the ground router behind nat at the client peer for handshake.many examples in the forumThanks | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114568 | Thread-1114568 | RouterOS | I have configured wireguards on two mikrotiks, one as a server and the otehr as a client.The Client is on a dynamic IP and everytime the client goes offline, the server is not picking the new IP after the client has booted up.The tunnel is only coming back to life if I didable the tunnel on the mikrotik (server side)Ki... | 7 | Check on client peer side if Persistent Keepalive is set (typical: set it to 25s = 00:00:25). | The Server does not pickup the new address, its the client that has to establish the handshake, well if there is a certain gap in time anyway.Post both full configs to see what may be causing the issue./export file=anynameyouwish (minus router serial number, any public WANIP information, vpn keys etc.) | i had a similar problem with WG client config on mikrotik router with VPN provider where when my WAN IP changed (sometimes it is a private ip given out by ISP modem DHCP for short duration before a public IP(passthrough) is provided by ISP fiber modem). WG client connections which are relatively idle cannot connect aga... | teleport is this still an issue with 7.16.2?timing issues were resolved to my knowledge and if not we should know about it and report to Mikrotik to fix. | yes am on latest stable 7.16.2 and have support request open. my case may be a bit different in the sense that a private WAN ip comes in the mix which breaks tunnel(non internet rout-able) and mikrotik WG client does not reconnect once public WAN IP is assigned. | Hi ColleaguesI tried the solutions which you had mentioned here but still the problem is occuring. However, I tried to set up a scheduler to be refreshing wireguard interface by disabling and enabling it within 2 seconds. Still more this is working on some of the peers but not the rest.so I wanted your help on how I ca... | You still have not posted both configs... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114569 | Thread-1114569 | RouterOS | I want to know how to create two different groups that can connect to my two internets that I get from my internet provider on the server.I need the WireGuard service.I have done some work, but I have a few problems with it, I will note them.The internet speed decreases after connecting to WireGuard.When I ping DNS, it... | 1 | Full config required, not snippets and its not clear why you need wireguard.From the diagram it looks like you simply want some computers on your LAN to go out WAN1 and some other computers to go out WAN2.Further its not clear if you are connecting to a third party vpn service, a CHR in the cloud or something else, or ... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114587 | Thread-1114587 | RouterOS | Hi.Devices= QRT5 (PTP)Using superchannel and no country.Band: 5GHz, Channel Width =20MhzScan List=4920-6100On Station-Bridge (Far End Antenna) I cannot use "Used Frequency" as it disconnects the link and also I cannot see the result. So I use /interface wireless scan wlan1 rounds=1 save-file=scan1The scan1 file lists F... | 4 | check that in addition to the country you have entered the installation on outdoor to enable the outdoor frequencies | Thanks you for reply.Yes I had set installation:outdoor and "no country set" to get scan of as many Radio signals as possible | What ROS version ?There was a change in ROS 7.14 where "no country" results in "Latvia". | Both installation and country is there to comply with regulations.It has, afaik, nothing to do with scan results.Is it possible there are no radios in the neighbourhood transmitting at those frequencies? | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114594 | Thread-1114594 | RouterOS | Hi, I have a CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS that I started testing. However, I didn't realize when I bough it but it seems there are no features supported directly in the hardware switching on this device. The Mikrotik documentation for switch chips reports nothing is available on the ASIC and apparently all is done on the CPU. Is... | 4 | ```
Isthat correct?yesblock diagram especify that CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS includes following chip:https://i.mt.lv/cdn/product_files/CCR20 ... 200459.pngpassive intelligent port extenderPIPE98PX1012Switch Chip Features manualhttps://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ ... p+Featuresspecify no hardware features for 98PX1012Bridge... | I bought this thing. It has 25G interfaces to be a typical bridge, but there is no way to transfer even 10G in bridge mode. Is this some kind of joke? | I bought this thing. It has 25G interfaces to be a typical bridge, but there is no way to transfer even 10G in bridge mode. Is this some kind of joke?You bought router which happens to have 2x 25Gbps ports (and some others). Official test results tell that thing canrouteat speeds between 5Gbps and 20Gbps depending on a... | I bought this thing. It has 25G interfaces to be a typical bridge, but there is no way to transfer even 10G in bridge mode. Is this some kind of joke?You bought router which happens to have 2x 25Gbps ports (and some others). Official test results tell that thing canrouteat speeds between 5Gbps and 20Gbps depending on a... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114606 | Thread-1114606 | RouterOS | Hello guys, i have this config
```
/interfacebridgeaddname=bridge1/interfacewireguardaddlisten-port=13231mtu=1420name=wireguard1/interfacevlanaddinterface=ether1 name=vlan835 vlan-id=835/interfacebondingaddname=bonding1 slaves=ether2,ether3,ether4/interfacepppoe-clientaddadd-default-route=yes disabled=nointerface=vlan8... | 2 | you didn't write what hardware you are using?what type queue is cake? (this section is missing in the configuration)creating so many queues you should have a parent for them | This bridge has no name:
```
/interfacebridge portaddbridge=*Binterface=ether5addbridge=*Binterface=wifi1addbridge=*Binterface=wifi2Whenever there is an asterisk followed by a (hex) number it means that "something" was there but was removed or deleted and Ros lost track of it, so it placed a reference to it in the form... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114611 | Thread-1114611 | RouterOS | Hello everyone, I see that this solution was never clear for many so I went ahead and outlined a very simple three steps to getting remote packet captures with ROS done quick.This post is meant to be a quick practical guide to help you capture traffic quickly for whatever your reasons may be. It can be a huge help with... | 5 | Also available in Mangle:Action - sniff-tzsp - send a packet to a remote TZSP compatible system (such as Wireshark). Set remote target with sniff-target and sniff-target-port parameters (Wireshark recommends port 37008)https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ ... ngle-Stats | Also available in Mangle:I didn't even know about this! Thanks! | I usethis old experimentof mine, and I'm very satisfied with it. I like that I see only captured packets, there's no unnecessary trace of TZSP. | I usethis old experimentof mine, and I'm very satisfied with it. I like that I see only captured packets, there's no unnecessary trace of TZSP.very interesting i will give a try | Hi there, I'm playing around with Packet Sniffer and Wireshark but I don't see that much in the received packets.I used default settings so Wireshark simply listen to the LAN port that's it.My MTs and my Wireshark sit in different subnets so is the before mentioned settings are necessary to see the original captured pa... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114645 | Thread-1114645 | RouterOS | Hi, Trying to defina an array to loop trafic type with kid-control feature in MKT 7.16but get confued with how to define array this is my code and know that Forum guru halped me a lot to get to this pointand i am really happy for his help again.This is my code:{:global abc [:toarray "youtube, google, amazon"]:foreach a... | 2 | ~ is for a regular expression, not an array...So you can use a string with a valid regex like::global abc "youtube|google|amazon" | ~ is for a regular expression, not an array...So you can use a string with a valid regex like::global abc "youtube|google|amazon"You solve everything with such an ease.Thank you | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114654 | Thread-1114654 | RouterOS | Hi.Is there a way to set up romon over 1 mikrotik that is vpn server and others that are vpn clients? | 42 | RoMON works over Layer 2 but you can connect to a router via Layer3 over a VPN and use RoMON to access the routers behind a VPN gateway that are reachable via RoMON.ZeroTier or L2TP are good choice if you also want to be able to connect via RoMON at L2 over a VPN. | i need specific vpn or i can also with sstp? | For L3 access (connect via IPv4/IPv6)to a MIkroTik router that can reach RoMON enabled devices behind itAny VPN will workFor L2 access (Connect via MAC address)to a MikroTik router that can reach RoMON enabled devices behind itL2TP, EoIP or ZeroTier will work. | i have sstp connected to another mikrotik .now what i need to do? maybe with routes? to have access via romon?sorry for question | Enable RoMON on the VPN router
```
tool/romon/setenabled=yesThen use the same command to enable RoMON on any router connected to the VPN router or reachable to the VPN mikrotik via routing.Watching the MikroTik official video on RoMON will help:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Peg6UcSJ_eA
---
``` | i d id that i also have enebled on vpn server-client romon but i cant see each other. i can ping each other rom terminal i set also routes i am done rom these ... i dont know why dont see via romon | Do you have a drawing of your network? | router A (vpn server office ) :192.168.71.0/24 (vpn range)router B (vpn client home) :192.168.71.3 (vpn ip)on neigbors i can see the vpn client but only with ip not mac adress as said on video ... | do you know if the problem is cause one router has 6.48 and other 7.7? | You cannot connect via MAC address over SSTP as it is a Layer3 VPNYou need to use what is called a Layer 2 overlay - examples are: L2TP, EoIP or ZeroTier. Then you will be able to connect via MAC between those locations. | i dont want mac adress .. i want just to connect with romon ... need any other settings to do that please>? | Where is the device you want to connect to with RoMON - on the home network or work network?How is it connected to the VPN client or server? | i need specific vpn or i can also with sstp?Yes you can.But going to a remote RouterOS over routed IP with WinBox, and use that remote ROS as RoMon bridgehead to see the rest via RoMon is easy. As already suggested here.If you want to have L2 access to the remote site, use BCP over that SSTP VPN.The wiki only gives the... | i need romon on the router of home networkvpn server is on my work . and client is home .. at this time i am in my work .these 2 routers are connected over sstp . and has routes to access all the network of each other. | i dont want mac adress .. i want just to connect with romonAFAIK RoMon is L2 (MAC) only. | i need romon on the router of home networkFrom work, connect with WinBox by using "Connect to RoMon" with the home router IP as selected device. In that RoMon/Winbox session select from "RoMon Neighbors" tab. Use "Connect"L2/MAC is only home, Home-Work is L3 IP. | i connect with ip on romon but i didnt see anything :S | lets take it from start.Router A office VPN SERVERRouter B home VPN CLIENTlaptop VPN CLIENThow from my laptop access HOME router over romon of OFFICE router that i connected with vpn from my laptop | Laptop WinBox connects to Router B Home with "Connect to RoMON"Klembord-3.jpgThat session opens, and then select the TAB "RoMON Neighbors"If RoMON is configured on the HOME devices , see (if no Firewall is blocking, RoMON is enabled with same secret, and devices are on the same L2 network,) and select the Router you wa... | i dont want mac adress .. i want just to connect with romon ... need any other settings to do that please>?vpn server is on my work . and client is home .. at this time i am in my work .these 2 routers are connected over sstp . and has routes to access all the network of each other.Why would you use RoMON , if you have... | i did this and nothing happens..from my laptop i connected on office via vpn .from home connected on office via vpnfrom laptop connect romon on office router ipbut office ---> home is also remote so l3 and no l2 this is that i want to fix and acess | i dont want mac adress .. i want just to connect with romon ... need any other settings to do that please>?vpn server is on my work . and client is home .. at this time i am in my work .these 2 routers are connected over sstp . and has routes to access all the network of each other.Why would you use RoMON , if you have... | Make sure you can ping home router from your laptop. (IP routes must be OK in laptop, Office router, Home router, or OFFICE router could use NAT)Then use WinBox to access Home Router. If you can Ping but not WinBox, check firewall rules on OFFICE and HOME router.RoMON is not usable for these L3 connections, and not nee... | i can ping all from all and winbox all from all but not romon ... | What does RoMON do more than what Winbox can???????Add/Set your WinBox sessions, and have a list with all your routers including credentials (better view with WinBox Tools in "Advanced Mode".)RoMON is only a WinBox session forwarder via L2 broadcasts/multicasts, not using IP (L3). | ok ok but why i cant connect with romon ?? is there an answer? | i can ping all from all and winbox all from all but not romon ...It sounds like maybe you don't understand why RoMON exists and what it's used for.RoMON was added to RouterOS in 2015 to make it easier to manage routers using L2 only. Previously if you had a routing issue and needed to mac telnet to a router several hop... | A romon connection is between 2 routers that have RoMON enabled and communicate over a L2 connection.WinBOX can connect toRoMON Agentof one of those routers via IP or L2 (MAC) , because it is the same connection as the regular WinBox connection on port TCP/8291.If you can connect with WinBox, you can connect to the RoM... | btw thanks for all . i am sorry . | Wow. Lots of highly technical responses, but no one actually gave him the answer. Hopefully he reads this:First, to those who ask "why you want ROMON when you've got a direct VPN to the other network?" This is the old why did the chicken cross the road question. To get to the other network. In this case, the other netw... | I think the simple way to explain it is that we assume you're using winbox, behind a L3 VPN (e.g. SSTP here)... you use the IP address but still use "connect to RoMON". After connection, the Layer2 RoMON neighbors are visible in winbox. You the pick one of those to use. As long as the first router you used for the "Con... | But very good point: 100% right, RoMON does not like MTU below 1500. | I tend to connect directly from winbox, but I keep ROMON for "emergencies" and for things like what I'm working on today, where I'm duplicating a production network into a test network to work on MSTP. We've got 6 10Gb fiber connections for about 35 VLANS and we're adding a 10Gb radio and a second pair of MSTP switches... | Yeah it's two-step dance in using it ... and a bit convoluted in winbox's UI. But RoMON gets a bad wrap.I'd perfer to use ZeroTier for out-of-band management. But RoMON helps a bunch... since there is no ZeroTier on MIPSx devicesSo as long as there is some ARM router with ZeroTier-enabled & RoMON enabled, I have that a... | ... you connect to a reachable Mikrotik using connect to ROMON and go from there.This.Connect using direct, VPN, EOIP, Zerotier, EOIP over WG (), ... whatever.And the whole Mikrotik L2 network will unfold using ROMON. | I have not tried zero tier on Mikrotiks. Most of my routers are tile. Lots of arm in the field, mostly 3011/4011, but everything else is a 1009, 1036 or 1072. And I have just put my original 1200 back in service. I bought it/them when they were released. Must be a dozen years old. Pulled six of them off the shelf and t... | I would like to setup RoMON between two Mikrotik on two sites as emergency path.The two sites are linked with some L3 "tunnels" and also ZeroTier, i.e. both have an interface on the same ZT network.Simply enabling RoMON on all interfaces via settings seems not enough: discovery doens't find anything.Something else is n... | ForZeroTier with RoMON, you need to modify the flow rules to allow it on at my.zerotier.com. RoMON uses a non-standard ether-type at Layer 2, so this needs to be allowed in the "Flow Rules" for the ZT network. Specifically adding the following at very TOP of the rules (before the drop rules):
```
## Allow RoMON.#accept... | The above rule is needed for ZeroTier + RoMON.But I recently wrote up steps forEoIP + IPSec with RoMONhere – since not all routers support ZeroTier:viewtopic.php?t=206322 | What if you wanted to do EoIP on top of wireguard and add RoMON? | What if you wanted to do EoIP on top of wireguard and add RoMON?Ask and answered below. SoEoIP + WG with RoMONis discussed here:viewtopic.php?t=203137&hilit=romon+wg#p1046880 | ForZeroTier with RoMON, you need to modify the flow rules to allow it on at my.zerotier.com. RoMON uses a non-standard ether-type at Layer 2, so this needs to be allowed in the "Flow Rules" for the ZT network. Specifically adding the following at very TOP of the rules (before the drop rules):
```
## Allow RoMON.#accept... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
1114661 | Thread-1114661 | RouterOS | Hi, I'm pretty fine reading any kind of registers with the KNOT device via the transceive command, like/iot modbus transceive address=1 function=1 data=00000006 (read 6 coil registers from 0 - 5, it will return a decimal number what can be processed to become digitals)/iot modbus transceive address=1 function=2 data=00... | 2 | I think that the issue is that the data does not represent the same things with different functions.Or if you prefer each function has different arguments.Check this:https://www.fernhillsoftware.com/help/d ... tocol.htmlwith this:function=3 data=000000AAyou are actually sending03 (read) 0000=First input address (from) ... | write single holding register as integer:/iot modbus transceive address=1 function=6 values=a2, a1, v2, v1a2 - high byte of register addressa1 - low byte of register addressv2 - high byte of valuev1 - low byte of valueas hexadecimal:/iot modbus transceive address=1 function=6 data=A2A1V2V1set value 10 to register at ad... | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null | null |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.