prompt listlengths 2 2 | completion listlengths 1 1 | label bool 2
classes | reasoning stringlengths 213 11.3k | answer stringclasses 4
values | gt_answer stringclasses 3
values | paper_id stringclasses 300
values | anchor_id stringlengths 13 13 | bin int64 0 9 | input_gt float64 1 8.67 | anchor_gt float64 0.5 8 | similarity float64 0.68 0.92 | run_idx int64 0 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. Review 1 is AI-generated (likely from a template) and says the paper is incomplete, cuts off mid-sentence, missing sections, etc. It gives a score of -100 and decision Error. But we are not asked to score, just to compare which paper is better based on the review... | false | We are given two reviews. Review 1 is AI-generated (likely from a template) and says the paper is incomplete, cuts off mid-sentence, missing sections, etc. It gives a score of -100 and decision Error. But we are not asked to score, just to compare which paper is better based on the reviews. Review 2 is human-written an... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | dHdXvu5ehy.md | 5 | 6.67 | 4.75 | 0.760485 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated and says the paper is incomplete (truncated), so it cannot be evaluated. The second paper (Review 2) has multiple human reviews, indicating it is a complete paper with some weaknesses but also s... | false | We need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated and says the paper is incomplete (truncated), so it cannot be evaluated. The second paper (Review 2) has multiple human reviews, indicating it is a complete paper with some weaknesses but also strengths. The first paper's rev... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | GFzmAKw3RW.md | 4 | 6.67 | 3.75 | 0.759844 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. The first review is for a paper titled \"MXNET\" about estimating clique number. The review says the paper is severely truncated, missing entire sections including experiments. It gives a score of -100 and decision Error, meaning the paper is incomplete and canno... | false | We are given two reviews. The first review is for a paper titled "MXNET" about estimating clique number. The review says the paper is severely truncated, missing entire sections including experiments. It gives a score of -100 and decision Error, meaning the paper is incomplete and cannot be evaluated. The second review... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | XWfjugkXzN.md | 1 | 6.67 | 1.666667 | 0.743143 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. Review 1 is about a paper called MXNET. The review states that the paper is severely truncated; the experiments and most method sections are missing. The reviewer says the paper cannot be evaluated and returns an error. Essentially, the paper as provided is incom... | false | We are given two reviews. Review 1 is about a paper called MXNET. The review states that the paper is severely truncated; the experiments and most method sections are missing. The reviewer says the paper cannot be evaluated and returns an error. Essentially, the paper as provided is incomplete, so it's not a valid pape... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | F8l0llkMk0.md | 3 | 6.67 | 3.333333 | 0.770122 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. The first review is for a paper that is severely truncated, missing major sections. The review states it's incomplete and returns Error. The second review is for a paper that also seems incomplete, with human reviewers noting it's only an abstract and partial int... | false | We are given two reviews. The first review is for a paper that is severely truncated, missing major sections. The review states it's incomplete and returns Error. The second review is for a paper that also seems incomplete, with human reviewers noting it's only an abstract and partial introduction, lacking methods and ... | tie | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | 5lUdTogEL3.md | 0 | 6.67 | 1 | 0.773686 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is for a paper called \"MXNET\" about estimating clique number. The review states that the paper is severely truncated, missing most of the method details, all experiments, and references. The reviewer gives a dec... | false | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is for a paper called "MXNET" about estimating clique number. The review states that the paper is severely truncated, missing most of the method details, all experiments, and references. The reviewer gives a decision of "Error" and says the pap... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | AxYTFpdlvj.md | 2 | 6.67 | 2 | 0.761111 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first paper's review is AI-generated and indicates the paper is severely truncated (incomplete). The second paper's review is human-written and gives mixed feedback: some weaknesses but also strengths. The instruction says to ... | false | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first paper's review is AI-generated and indicates the paper is severely truncated (incomplete). The second paper's review is human-written and gives mixed feedback: some weaknesses but also strengths. The instruction says to evaluate the papers themselves,... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | XWfjugkXzN.md | 1 | 6.67 | 1.666667 | 0.743143 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review says the paper is incomplete and gives a decision of \"Error\" with score -100. The second review describes a paper about lifelong person re-identification, but the human reviewers all say the submitted manuscript... | false | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review says the paper is incomplete and gives a decision of "Error" with score -100. The second review describes a paper about lifelong person re-identification, but the human reviewers all say the submitted manuscript is incomplete (only abstract and... | tie | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | 5lUdTogEL3.md | 0 | 6.67 | 1 | 0.773686 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that.\n\nReview 1 (AI-generated) says the paper is incomplete: it is severely truncated, missing large secti... | false | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that.
Review 1 (AI-generated) says the paper is incomplete: it is severely truncated, missing large sections including experiments. It giv... | tie | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | 5lUdTogEL3.md | 0 | 6.67 | 1 | 0.773686 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review (for paper 1, MXNET) is AI-generated. The second review (for paper 2, \"On the Hölder Stability of Multiset and Graph Neural Networks\") is human-written. We need to determine which paper is better, accounting for... | true | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review (for paper 1, MXNET) is AI-generated. The second review (for paper 2, "On the Hölder Stability of Multiset and Graph Neural Networks") is human-written. We need to determine which paper is better, accounting for the fact that the AI reviewer ca... | 1 | 1 | DFSb67ksVr | P7KIGdgW8S.md | 9 | 6.67 | 8 | 0.739853 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated and describes a paper that is incomplete—the file is severely truncated, missing major sections including experiments. The review states the paper cannot be evaluated and gives a decision of \"E... | true | We need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated and describes a paper that is incomplete—the file is severely truncated, missing major sections including experiments. The review states the paper cannot be evaluated and gives a decision of "Error". This indicates the paper ... | 1 | 1 | DFSb67ksVr | P7KIGdgW8S.md | 9 | 6.67 | 8 | 0.739853 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. Review 1 is about a paper called MXNET, but the review states that the paper is incomplete: the file is severely truncated, missing major sections (experiments, method details, references). The reviewer gives a decision \"Error\" and says score -100. This clearly... | false | We are given two reviews. Review 1 is about a paper called MXNET, but the review states that the paper is incomplete: the file is severely truncated, missing major sections (experiments, method details, references). The reviewer gives a decision "Error" and says score -100. This clearly indicates that the paper cannot ... | 1 | tie | DFSb67ksVr | qaJxPhkYtD.md | 7 | 6.67 | 6 | 0.753928 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to evaluate which paper is better based on the reviews. The first paper is incomplete (truncated, missing experiments and crucial sections). The second paper appears complete but has mixed reviews, with some positive but many criticisms regarding novelty, missing details, lack of ... | false | We need to evaluate which paper is better based on the reviews. The first paper is incomplete (truncated, missing experiments and crucial sections). The second paper appears complete but has mixed reviews, with some positive but many criticisms regarding novelty, missing details, lack of uncertainty, etc. The AI-genera... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | AxYTFpdlvj.md | 2 | 6.67 | 2 | 0.761111 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. The first review is of a paper titled \"MXNET\" that attempts to estimate clique number. The review indicates the paper is severely truncated: missing experiments, method details, references, etc. The review says \"Per the review instructions: If the paper is com... | false | We are given two reviews. The first review is of a paper titled "MXNET" that attempts to estimate clique number. The review indicates the paper is severely truncated: missing experiments, method details, references, etc. The review says "Per the review instructions: If the paper is completely incomplete, skip everythin... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | dHdXvu5ehy.md | 5 | 6.67 | 4.75 | 0.760485 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. The first review is AI-generated (as per instruction) and the second is human-written. We must determine which paper is better based on the reviews, accounting for the fact that the AI reviewer can be too nice. So we need to evaluate the papers themselves, not th... | false | We are given two reviews. The first review is AI-generated (as per instruction) and the second is human-written. We must determine which paper is better based on the reviews, accounting for the fact that the AI reviewer can be too nice. So we need to evaluate the papers themselves, not the reviews.
First, understand t... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | vYBzgwkwZb.md | 6 | 6.67 | 5.666667 | 0.764532 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. The first review is of a paper called MXNET. The review says the paper is severely truncated, missing large sections including the entire experimental evaluation. The review says to skip everything and return score -100 and decision Error, but we are not asked to... | false | We are given two reviews. The first review is of a paper called MXNET. The review says the paper is severely truncated, missing large sections including the entire experimental evaluation. The review says to skip everything and return score -100 and decision Error, but we are not asked to score; we need to determine wh... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | vYBzgwkwZb.md | 6 | 6.67 | 5.666667 | 0.764532 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated and is about a paper titled \"MXNET\" that is severely truncated – the review says the paper is incomplete, missing most of the content including experiments, method details, etc. The re... | true | We are asked to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated and is about a paper titled "MXNET" that is severely truncated – the review says the paper is incomplete, missing most of the content including experiments, method details, etc. The review assigns score -100 and decis... | 1 | 1 | DFSb67ksVr | P7KIGdgW8S.md | 9 | 6.67 | 8 | 0.739853 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to compare the two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, but the second is human-written. The instructions say: \"The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too nice, account for that.\" So we n... | false | We need to compare the two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, but the second is human-written. The instructions say: "The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too nice, account for that." So we need to judge which paper is bette... | 1 | tie | DFSb67ksVr | 7vVWiCrFnd.md | 8 | 6.67 | 6.6 | 0.746135 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews of two different papers. We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second is human written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so account for that. Answer with a single token: 0 if first paper is better... | false | We are given two reviews of two different papers. We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second is human written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so account for that. Answer with a single token: 0 if first paper is better, 1 if second paper is better, ... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | AxYTFpdlvj.md | 2 | 6.67 | 2 | 0.761111 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews of two different papers. The task is to determine which paper is better based on the reviews, accounting for the fact that the first review is AI-generated and may be too nice. We need to output a single token: 0 if the first paper is better, 1 if the second paper... | false | We are given two reviews of two different papers. The task is to determine which paper is better based on the reviews, accounting for the fact that the first review is AI-generated and may be too nice. We need to output a single token: 0 if the first paper is better, 1 if the second paper is better, or tie if about equ... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | vYBzgwkwZb.md | 6 | 6.67 | 5.666667 | 0.764532 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, and the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that.\n\nReview 1: The paper is about MXNET, a neural model for clique number estimation. How... | false | We are asked to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, and the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that.
Review 1: The paper is about MXNET, a neural model for clique number estimation. However, the review states that the ... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | GFzmAKw3RW.md | 4 | 6.67 | 3.75 | 0.759844 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, and the second is human-written. We need to judge which paper is better, accounting for the AI reviewer possibly being too nice. The first paper (MXNET) is described as \"incomplete\" because the ... | false | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, and the second is human-written. We need to judge which paper is better, accounting for the AI reviewer possibly being too nice. The first paper (MXNET) is described as "incomplete" because the provided file is severely truncat... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | XWfjugkXzN.md | 1 | 6.67 | 1.666667 | 0.743143 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, so we should account for the AI being too nice. However, the first review is clearly negative: it says the paper is incomplete because the file is truncated, missing entire sections including experimen... | false | We need to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, so we should account for the AI being too nice. However, the first review is clearly negative: it says the paper is incomplete because the file is truncated, missing entire sections including experiments. Score is -100, decision Err... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | GFzmAKw3RW.md | 4 | 6.67 | 3.75 | 0.759844 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews of two different papers. We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews, accounting for the fact that the first review is AI-generated (and may be too nice) and the second is human-written. We should evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality... | false | We are given two reviews of two different papers. We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews, accounting for the fact that the first review is AI-generated (and may be too nice) and the second is human-written. We should evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews.
Review 1 (AI-... | 1 | 0 | zxg6601zoc | u1cQYxRI1H.md | 0 | 5.75 | 0.5 | 0.745879 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked: \"determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews.\" The first review is AI generated, the second is human written. We are to account for the AI reviewer being too nice.\n\nReview 1: The paper is MXNET... | false | We are asked: "determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews." The first review is AI generated, the second is human written. We are to account for the AI reviewer being too nice.
Review 1: The paper is MXNET. The review says the paper is seve... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | F8l0llkMk0.md | 3 | 6.67 | 3.333333 | 0.770122 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated and the second is human-written. The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we should account for that. The first paper is about Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT) for LMMs, and the second is abo... | true | We need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated and the second is human-written. The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we should account for that. The first paper is about Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT) for LMMs, and the second is about Long Horizon Episodic Decisi... | 0 | 0 | zxg6601zoc | N581Nje6fH.md | 1 | 5.75 | 1.5 | 0.754396 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to evaluate which paper is better based solely on the reviews. The first review (AI-generated) is for \"Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT)\". The second review (human-written) is for \"Long Horizon Episodic Decision Making for Cognitively Inspired Robots\". The instruction say... | true | We need to evaluate which paper is better based solely on the reviews. The first review (AI-generated) is for "Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT)". The second review (human-written) is for "Long Horizon Episodic Decision Making for Cognitively Inspired Robots". The instruction says: evaluate the papers themselves, ... | 0 | 0 | zxg6601zoc | N581Nje6fH.md | 1 | 5.75 | 1.5 | 0.754396 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated and might be too nice; the second is human-written. But we are to evaluate the papers themselves, not the reviews.\n\nReview 1: The paper is about MXNET, a neural method for clique number est... | false | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated and might be too nice; the second is human-written. But we are to evaluate the papers themselves, not the reviews.
Review 1: The paper is about MXNET, a neural method for clique number estimation. However, the review stat... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | dHdXvu5ehy.md | 5 | 6.67 | 4.75 | 0.760485 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, but the instructions say to account for the fact that the AI reviewer can be too nice. However, the first review is actually very critical: it points out that the paper is severely truncated, miss... | false | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, but the instructions say to account for the fact that the AI reviewer can be too nice. However, the first review is actually very critical: it points out that the paper is severely truncated, missing entire sections (experiment... | 1 | 0 | DFSb67ksVr | F8l0llkMk0.md | 3 | 6.67 | 3.333333 | 0.770122 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. Review 1 is for a paper titled \"MXNET\" (likely a typo for \"MXNet\"? but it's about clique number estimation). The review states that the paper is severely truncated: the experimental section and most method details are missing. The reviewer says to skip and re... | false | We are given two reviews. Review 1 is for a paper titled "MXNET" (likely a typo for "MXNet"? but it's about clique number estimation). The review states that the paper is severely truncated: the experimental section and most method details are missing. The reviewer says to skip and return score -100 and decision Error.... | 1 | tie | DFSb67ksVr | 7vVWiCrFnd.md | 8 | 6.67 | 6.6 | 0.746135 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to compare the two papers based on their reviews. The task is to determine which paper is better, not which review is better. The first review (AI-generated) is for a paper on Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT) for LMMs. The second review (human-written) is for a paper on robu... | true | We need to compare the two papers based on their reviews. The task is to determine which paper is better, not which review is better. The first review (AI-generated) is for a paper on Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT) for LMMs. The second review (human-written) is for a paper on robust multimodal learning with mis... | 0 | 0 | zxg6601zoc | XTwwtlEfTF.md | 5 | 5.75 | 4.5 | 0.8546 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. The first review is for a paper titled \"MXNET\" (likely a placeholder name) that is severely truncated: the paper file cuts off mid-sentence, missing most of the method details and all of the experimental section. The reviewer gives a decision of \"Error\" and s... | false | We are given two reviews. The first review is for a paper titled "MXNET" (likely a placeholder name) that is severely truncated: the paper file cuts off mid-sentence, missing most of the method details and all of the experimental section. The reviewer gives a decision of "Error" and score -100 because the paper is inco... | 1 | tie | DFSb67ksVr | 7vVWiCrFnd.md | 8 | 6.67 | 6.6 | 0.746135 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is for \"Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT)\" and is AI-generated per the instruction. The second review is for \"Long Horizon Episodic Decision Making for Cognitively Inspired Robots\" and is human-writ... | true | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is for "Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT)" and is AI-generated per the instruction. The second review is for "Long Horizon Episodic Decision Making for Cognitively Inspired Robots" and is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nic... | 0 | 0 | zxg6601zoc | N581Nje6fH.md | 1 | 5.75 | 1.5 | 0.754396 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI generated, the second is human written. The AI reviewer may be too nice, so account for that. The first paper is about Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT) for LMMs, the second is about BalancEdit fo... | true | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI generated, the second is human written. The AI reviewer may be too nice, so account for that. The first paper is about Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT) for LMMs, the second is about BalancEdit for model editing. We need to jud... | 0 | 0 | zxg6601zoc | 4WsHgA8EG1.md | 4 | 5.75 | 3.666667 | 0.831395 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to compare the two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, and the second is human-written. The AI reviewer is noted to be \"too nice,\" so we should account for that. The task is to determine which paper is better, evaluating the papers themselves, not th... | false | We need to compare the two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, and the second is human-written. The AI reviewer is noted to be "too nice," so we should account for that. The task is to determine which paper is better, evaluating the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. Answer ... | 1 | 0 | zxg6601zoc | u1cQYxRI1H.md | 0 | 5.75 | 0.5 | 0.745879 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, and the second is human-written. The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we should account for that. The task is to evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews.\n\nPaper 1 (... | true | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, and the second is human-written. The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we should account for that. The task is to evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews.
Paper 1 (Review 1): Introduces Multimodal ... | 0 | 0 | zxg6601zoc | cagNCwQEEN.md | 3 | 5.75 | 3.4 | 0.821092 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to compare the papers themselves, not the reviews.\n\nReview 1 (AI) is for a paper on \"Mult... | true | We need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to compare the papers themselves, not the reviews.
Review 1 (AI) is for a paper on "Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT)... | 0 | 0 | zxg6601zoc | 4WsHgA8EG1.md | 4 | 5.75 | 3.666667 | 0.831395 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer might be too nice. We need to judge which paper is better based on the reviews, not the reviews themselves. \n\nReview 1 is for a paper on Multimodal Repres... | false | We need to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer might be too nice. We need to judge which paper is better based on the reviews, not the reviews themselves.
Review 1 is for a paper on Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT). It highlig... | 0 | tie | zxg6601zoc | WjPK2gj0xu.md | 6 | 5.75 | 5.5 | 0.84061 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI generated, the second is human written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that.\n\nFirst, let's assess the paper from Review 1 (Paper 1: MRT - Multimodal Representation Tuning).... | true | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI generated, the second is human written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that.
First, let's assess the paper from Review 1 (Paper 1: MRT - Multimodal Representation Tuning). The review is thorough and point... | 0 | 0 | zxg6601zoc | uffmkDtlR2.md | 2 | 5.75 | 2.6 | 0.811796 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer is sometimes too nice, so we should account for that. We need to evaluate the papers themselves, not the reviews.\n\nFirst, understand the papers fr... | false | We need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer is sometimes too nice, so we should account for that. We need to evaluate the papers themselves, not the reviews.
First, understand the papers from the reviews.
Review 1 (AI-gen... | 0 | tie | zxg6601zoc | uV9KFBVaFI.md | 7 | 5.75 | 6.25 | 0.859688 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that.\n\nFirst review (AI-generated) is about \"Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT)\". The review is qu... | false | We need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that.
First review (AI-generated) is about "Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT)". The review is quite detailed, pointing out strength... | 1 | tie | zxg6601zoc | EwFJaXVePU.md | 8 | 5.75 | 6.5 | 0.835077 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. We need to judge which paper is better, accounting for the fact that the AI reviewer can be too nice. We must output 0 if first paper is better, 1 if second is better,... | true | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. We need to judge which paper is better, accounting for the fact that the AI reviewer can be too nice. We must output 0 if first paper is better, 1 if second is better, or tie if about equally good (... | 0 | 0 | xoXn62FzD0 | Uj0h13lVrR.md | 0 | 8 | 1 | 0.736817 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews, accounting for the fact that the AI reviewer might be too nice. We must output a single token: 0 if first paper is better, 1 if second ... | true | We are given two reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews, accounting for the fact that the AI reviewer might be too nice. We must output a single token: 0 if first paper is better, 1 if second is better, or tie if they are a... | 0 | 0 | xoXn62FzD0 | Uj0h13lVrR.md | 0 | 8 | 1 | 0.736817 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to compare the two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice; we must account for that.\n\nFirst, assess the papers themselves from the reviews. Review 1 (AI) is for \"Multimodal Representation Tun... | false | We need to compare the two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice; we must account for that.
First, assess the papers themselves from the reviews. Review 1 (AI) is for "Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT)". It highlights extreme ... | 0 | tie | zxg6601zoc | uV9KFBVaFI.md | 7 | 5.75 | 6.25 | 0.859688 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to evaluate the papers themselves, not the reviews.\n\nReview 1 is for a paper on Multimo... | true | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to evaluate the papers themselves, not the reviews.
Review 1 is for a paper on Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT). ... | 0 | 0 | zxg6601zoc | uffmkDtlR2.md | 2 | 5.75 | 2.6 | 0.811796 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated and the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to compare the papers themselves, not the reviews.\n\nFirst paper: \"Multimodal Repres... | true | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated and the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to compare the papers themselves, not the reviews.
First paper: "Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT)" - a paramet... | 0 | 0 | zxg6601zoc | 4WsHgA8EG1.md | 4 | 5.75 | 3.666667 | 0.831395 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews of two different papers. The first review is AI generated, the second is human written. We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews, accounting that the AI reviewer can be too nice. The task: answer with 0 if first paper better, 1 if second pap... | false | We are given two reviews of two different papers. The first review is AI generated, the second is human written. We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews, accounting that the AI reviewer can be too nice. The task: answer with 0 if first paper better, 1 if second paper better, or tie if about equa... | 1 | tie | zxg6601zoc | EwFJaXVePU.md | 8 | 5.75 | 6.5 | 0.835077 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews for two different papers. The task: determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. We need to evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so ... | true | We are given two reviews for two different papers. The task: determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. We need to evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. Ans... | 0 | 0 | zxg6601zoc | XTwwtlEfTF.md | 5 | 5.75 | 4.5 | 0.8546 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated and the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to evaluate the papers themselves, not the reviews.\n\nReview 1 (AI-generated) for Pap... | false | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated and the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to evaluate the papers themselves, not the reviews.
Review 1 (AI-generated) for Paper 1: "Multimodal Representation ... | 0 | tie | zxg6601zoc | uV9KFBVaFI.md | 7 | 5.75 | 6.25 | 0.859688 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. The first review is for a paper titled \"MXNET\" (presumably), and it states that the paper is severely truncated and incomplete, missing crucial sections like experiments, method details, and references. The reviewer gives a score of -100 and decision \"Error\" ... | false | We are given two reviews. The first review is for a paper titled "MXNET" (presumably), and it states that the paper is severely truncated and incomplete, missing crucial sections like experiments, method details, and references. The reviewer gives a score of -100 and decision "Error" because the paper cannot be evaluat... | 1 | tie | DFSb67ksVr | qaJxPhkYtD.md | 7 | 6.67 | 6 | 0.753928 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first paper (MXNET) is AI-generated and the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that. The first review says the paper is severely truncated, missing key sections including experi... | false | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first paper (MXNET) is AI-generated and the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that. The first review says the paper is severely truncated, missing key sections including experiments, and thus cannot be evalu... | 1 | tie | DFSb67ksVr | qaJxPhkYtD.md | 7 | 6.67 | 6 | 0.753928 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to compare the two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should be cautious about overly positive assessments. However, we are to evaluate the papers themselves based on the reviews.\n\n... | true | We need to compare the two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should be cautious about overly positive assessments. However, we are to evaluate the papers themselves based on the reviews.
Review 1: This paper presents an ... | 0 | 0 | xoXn62FzD0 | cLTM1gc6Qm.md | 2 | 8 | 2.25 | 0.784697 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that.\n\nFirst, let's summarize the papers and reviews.\n\nPaper 1 (MRT): Multimodal Representation T... | true | We need to determine which paper is better based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that.
First, let's summarize the papers and reviews.
Paper 1 (MRT): Multimodal Representation Tuning, a parameter-efficient fine-t... | 0 | 0 | zxg6601zoc | uffmkDtlR2.md | 2 | 5.75 | 2.6 | 0.811796 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, second is human-written. The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we need to account for that. The first paper is about Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT), the second about Multi-modal Agen... | false | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, second is human-written. The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we need to account for that. The first paper is about Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT), the second about Multi-modal Agent Tuning (T3-agent).
From the... | 0 | 1 | zxg6601zoc | 0bmGL4q7vJ.md | 9 | 5.75 | 7.5 | 0.818256 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based solely on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated (and the reviewer notes it can be too nice), and the second review is human-written. We must consider the content of the reviews, not the quality of the review itself. The AI-generated... | false | We need to determine which paper is better based solely on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated (and the reviewer notes it can be too nice), and the second review is human-written. We must consider the content of the reviews, not the quality of the review itself. The AI-generated review is for a paper on Multi... | 1 | tie | zxg6601zoc | EwFJaXVePU.md | 8 | 5.75 | 6.5 | 0.835077 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews of two different papers. The first review is AI generated, the second is human written. The AI reviewer can sometimes be too nice, so we need to account for that. We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. Answer with 0 if first paper is bett... | false | We are given two reviews of two different papers. The first review is AI generated, the second is human written. The AI reviewer can sometimes be too nice, so we need to account for that. We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. Answer with 0 if first paper is better, 1 if second is better, or t... | 1 | 0 | xoXn62FzD0 | 48WAZhwHHw.md | 3 | 8 | 3.25 | 0.816992 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. Review 1 is about a paper on \"Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT)\" for LMMs. Review 2 is about a paper on \"Multimodal Instruction Tuning with Hybrid State Space Models\" (MMJAMBA). We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews, considering... | true | We are given two reviews. Review 1 is about a paper on "Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT)" for LMMs. Review 2 is about a paper on "Multimodal Instruction Tuning with Hybrid State Space Models" (MMJAMBA). We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews, considering that the first review is AI-genera... | 0 | 0 | zxg6601zoc | cagNCwQEEN.md | 3 | 5.75 | 3.4 | 0.821092 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated (review 1), and the second is human-written (review 2). The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that. We are to compare the papers themselves, not the reviews.\n\nReview 1:... | true | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated (review 1), and the second is human-written (review 2). The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that. We are to compare the papers themselves, not the reviews.
Review 1: This is a detailed review of a p... | 0 | 0 | xoXn62FzD0 | 0Yfjerm9Zp.md | 4 | 8 | 3.5 | 0.820377 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we should account for that. The first paper is about SMC for controlled LLM generation; the second is about Mockingbird platfo... | true | We need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we should account for that. The first paper is about SMC for controlled LLM generation; the second is about Mockingbird platform for LLMs as mock functions f... | 0 | 0 | xoXn62FzD0 | cLTM1gc6Qm.md | 2 | 8 | 2.25 | 0.784697 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that. We need to determine which paper is better, judging from the review. Answer with a single token: 0 if ... | true | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that. We need to determine which paper is better, judging from the review. Answer with a single token: 0 if the first paper is better, 1 if... | 0 | 0 | xoXn62FzD0 | Uj0h13lVrR.md | 0 | 8 | 1 | 0.736817 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that. We evaluate the papers themselves, not the reviews.\n\nLet's summarize each paper from the revie... | true | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that. We evaluate the papers themselves, not the reviews.
Let's summarize each paper from the reviews:
Paper 1 (from Review 1): "Se... | 0 | 0 | xoXn62FzD0 | dsALpkd1OU.md | 1 | 8 | 1.666667 | 0.771722 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that. We need to decide which paper is better, judging from the review. Output 0 if first paper better, 1 if... | true | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that. We need to decide which paper is better, judging from the review. Output 0 if first paper better, 1 if second paper better, or tie if... | 0 | 0 | xoXn62FzD0 | 0Yfjerm9Zp.md | 4 | 8 | 3.5 | 0.820377 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review (AI-generated) is for a paper on SMC for controlled LLM generation. The second review (human-written) is for a paper called D2Coder on LLM-based code debugging. The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we need ... | true | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review (AI-generated) is for a paper on SMC for controlled LLM generation. The second review (human-written) is for a paper called D2Coder on LLM-based code debugging. The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we need to account for that.
Let's ana... | 0 | 0 | xoXn62FzD0 | dsALpkd1OU.md | 1 | 8 | 1.666667 | 0.771722 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. Review 1 is AI generated, Review 2 is human written. We need to determine which paper is better, based on the reviews. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to output 0 if first paper is better, 1 if second is better, or tie if a... | true | We are given two reviews. Review 1 is AI generated, Review 2 is human written. We need to determine which paper is better, based on the reviews. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to output 0 if first paper is better, 1 if second is better, or tie if about equally good (within 1 poi... | 0 | 0 | xoXn62FzD0 | cLTM1gc6Qm.md | 2 | 8 | 2.25 | 0.784697 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews of two different papers. The task is to determine which paper is better based on the reviews, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI-generated and the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that. We need... | false | We are given two reviews of two different papers. The task is to determine which paper is better based on the reviews, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI-generated and the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that. We need to output a single token: 0 if... | 1 | 0 | zxg6601zoc | u1cQYxRI1H.md | 0 | 5.75 | 0.5 | 0.745879 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. Review 1 is AI-generated, Review 2 is human-written. The task is to determine which paper is better based on the reviews, accounting for the fact that the AI reviewer can be too nice. We need to output 0 if the first paper is better, 1 if the second paper is bett... | false | We are given two reviews. Review 1 is AI-generated, Review 2 is human-written. The task is to determine which paper is better based on the reviews, accounting for the fact that the AI reviewer can be too nice. We need to output 0 if the first paper is better, 1 if the second paper is better, or tie if they are about eq... | 0 | tie | zxg6601zoc | WjPK2gj0xu.md | 6 | 5.75 | 5.5 | 0.84061 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to decide which paper is better based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, and the second is human-written. The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we need to account for that. The task is to evaluate the papers themselves, not the reviews.\n\nReview 1 (AI-generated) ... | true | We need to decide which paper is better based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, and the second is human-written. The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we need to account for that. The task is to evaluate the papers themselves, not the reviews.
Review 1 (AI-generated) is for a paper on Sequential Mont... | 0 | 0 | xoXn62FzD0 | 0Yfjerm9Zp.md | 4 | 8 | 3.5 | 0.820377 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. Review 1 is described as AI generated, and Review 2 is human written. The task is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review. We need to account that the AI reviewer can sometimes be too nice. So we should evaluate the papers themselves based on ... | false | We are given two reviews. Review 1 is described as AI generated, and Review 2 is human written. The task is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review. We need to account that the AI reviewer can sometimes be too nice. So we should evaluate the papers themselves based on the reviews, considering the po... | 0 | 1 | zxg6601zoc | 0bmGL4q7vJ.md | 9 | 5.75 | 7.5 | 0.818256 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews of two different papers. Review 1 is about a paper on \"Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) framework for controlled LLM generation\", and Review 2 is about a paper on \"Amortizing intractable inference in large language models\" using GFlowNets. We need to determine whi... | false | We are given two reviews of two different papers. Review 1 is about a paper on "Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) framework for controlled LLM generation", and Review 2 is about a paper on "Amortizing intractable inference in large language models" using GFlowNets. We need to determine which paper is better based on the rev... | 1 | 0 | xoXn62FzD0 | Ouj6p4ca60.md | 6 | 8 | 5.5 | 0.816759 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we need to account for that.\n\nReview 1: The paper proposes BEER, a regularizer for value networks in DRL. The review list... | true | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we need to account for that.
Review 1: The paper proposes BEER, a regularizer for value networks in DRL. The review lists strengths: principled derivatio... | 0 | 0 | apXtolxDaJ | Uj0h13lVrR.md | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0.747966 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated (Review 1), the second is human-written (Review 2). The instruction says: \"evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews.\" Also, the AI reviewer can be too nice, so account... | true | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated (Review 1), the second is human-written (Review 2). The instruction says: "evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews." Also, the AI reviewer can be too nice, so account for that.
First, let's understa... | 0 | 0 | xoXn62FzD0 | DQfHkEcUqV.md | 5 | 8 | 4.75 | 0.827219 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on their reviews. The first review is AI generated, the second is human written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that. We are to evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. Answer with 0 if fir... | true | We need to determine which paper is better based on their reviews. The first review is AI generated, the second is human written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that. We are to evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. Answer with 0 if first paper is better, 1 if second... | tie | tie | zxg6601zoc | WjPK2gj0xu.md | 6 | 5.75 | 5.5 | 0.84061 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. We must determine which paper is better, judging from the reviews (not the quality of the reviews themselves). The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we should account ... | true | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. We must determine which paper is better, judging from the reviews (not the quality of the reviews themselves). The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we should account for that.
Let's analyze each r... | 0 | 0 | xoXn62FzD0 | dsALpkd1OU.md | 1 | 8 | 1.666667 | 0.771722 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we must account for that. We need to decide which paper is better, based on the reviews, not the quality of the reviews themselves.... | false | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we must account for that. We need to decide which paper is better, based on the reviews, not the quality of the reviews themselves.
Let's analyze each review.
R... | 1 | 0 | xoXn62FzD0 | 48WAZhwHHw.md | 3 | 8 | 3.25 | 0.816992 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to compare the papers themselves, not the reviews.\n\nFirst paper: \"Sequential Monte Car... | false | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to compare the papers themselves, not the reviews.
First paper: "Sequential Monte Carlo for Controlled LLM Generation u... | 0 | tie | xoXn62FzD0 | vi3DjUhFVm.md | 9 | 8 | 7.25 | 0.810591 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI generated, the second is human written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that.\n\nReview 1 (AI) is for a paper on BEER, a regularizer for value networks in DRL. It highlights stre... | true | We need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI generated, the second is human written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that.
Review 1 (AI) is for a paper on BEER, a regularizer for value networks in DRL. It highlights strengths: principled theoretical der... | 0 | 0 | apXtolxDaJ | C9BA0T3xhq.md | 2 | 6 | 2 | 0.795326 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to compare the two papers based on their reviews. The first paper (Review 1) is about an SMC framework for controlled LLM generation with constraints, tested on four domains. The second paper (Review 2) is about using Twisted SMC for math problem-solving verification, tested on tw... | true | We need to compare the two papers based on their reviews. The first paper (Review 1) is about an SMC framework for controlled LLM generation with constraints, tested on four domains. The second paper (Review 2) is about using Twisted SMC for math problem-solving verification, tested on two math benchmarks.
We are told... | 0 | 0 | xoXn62FzD0 | Ze4aPP0tIn.md | 8 | 8 | 6.6 | 0.847854 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to compare the two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we need to account for that.\n\nPaper 1 (from Review 1): Develops an SMC framework for controlled LLM generation, with separation ... | true | We need to compare the two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we need to account for that.
Paper 1 (from Review 1): Develops an SMC framework for controlled LLM generation, with separation of efficient and semantic potenti... | 0 | 0 | xoXn62FzD0 | 8g4XgC8HPF.md | 7 | 8 | 6 | 0.858722 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI generated, the second is human written. The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we should account for that.\n\nPaper 1: BEER - a regularizer for value networks in DRL. Review highlights strengths: princi... | true | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI generated, the second is human written. The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we should account for that.
Paper 1: BEER - a regularizer for value networks in DRL. Review highlights strengths: principled theoretical derivation, adap... | 0 | 0 | apXtolxDaJ | Uj0h13lVrR.md | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0.747966 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews of two different papers. The task is to determine which paper is better based on the reviews, not the quality of the reviews themselves. We are told the first review is AI-generated and the second is human-written, and we should account for the AI reviewer being \... | true | We are given two reviews of two different papers. The task is to determine which paper is better based on the reviews, not the quality of the reviews themselves. We are told the first review is AI-generated and the second is human-written, and we should account for the AI reviewer being "too nice" sometimes. So we need... | 0 | 0 | zxg6601zoc | XTwwtlEfTF.md | 5 | 5.75 | 4.5 | 0.8546 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. Review 1 is AI-generated, Review 2 is human-written. The instruction says: \"Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews.\" Also note: \"... | false | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. Review 1 is AI-generated, Review 2 is human-written. The instruction says: "Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews." Also note: "the AI reviewer can sometimes be t... | 0 | 1 | zxg6601zoc | 0bmGL4q7vJ.md | 9 | 5.75 | 7.5 | 0.818256 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to compare the papers themselves, not the reviews.\n\nFirst, understand what each paper is... | true | We need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer might be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to compare the papers themselves, not the reviews.
First, understand what each paper is about.
Paper from Review 1: Dev... | 0 | 0 | xoXn62FzD0 | 8g4XgC8HPF.md | 7 | 8 | 6 | 0.858722 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to decide which paper is better, within 1 point on a 10-point scale. Answer with 0 if first pap... | false | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to decide which paper is better, within 1 point on a 10-point scale. Answer with 0 if first paper is better, 1 if second is be... | 1 | 0 | xoXn62FzD0 | 48WAZhwHHw.md | 3 | 8 | 3.25 | 0.816992 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first paper (BEER) has a review that is AI-generated and might be too nice, but we need to account for that. The second paper (EIQL) has human reviews that are quite negative: lack of rigor, notation issues, missing defi... | true | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first paper (BEER) has a review that is AI-generated and might be too nice, but we need to account for that. The second paper (EIQL) has human reviews that are quite negative: lack of rigor, notation issues, missing definitions, few seeds, poor writin... | 0 | 0 | apXtolxDaJ | C9BA0T3xhq.md | 2 | 6 | 2 | 0.795326 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews and determine which paper is better. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that. We need to output a single token: 0 if first paper is better, 1 if... | true | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews and determine which paper is better. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that. We need to output a single token: 0 if first paper is better, 1 if second is better, or tie if ab... | 0 | 0 | apXtolxDaJ | N581Nje6fH.md | 1 | 6 | 1.5 | 0.749366 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to compare the two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. The first paper (BEER) appears to be about a regularizer for value networks in DRL with a theoretical de... | true | We need to compare the two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. The first paper (BEER) appears to be about a regularizer for value networks in DRL with a theoretical derivation and strong empirical r... | 0 | 0 | apXtolxDaJ | N581Nje6fH.md | 1 | 6 | 1.5 | 0.749366 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is for a paper called \"BEER\" (a regularizer for value networks in DRL). The second review is for a paper called \"Weak Bisimulation Metric-based Representations for Sparse-Reward Reinforcement Learnin... | true | We are asked to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is for a paper called "BEER" (a regularizer for value networks in DRL). The second review is for a paper called "Weak Bisimulation Metric-based Representations for Sparse-Reward Reinforcement Learning" (SRL). We are told the first re... | 0 | 0 | apXtolxDaJ | x7Q0uFTH2a.md | 4 | 6 | 3.75 | 0.826908 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. Review 1 is AI-generated, Review 2 is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to evaluate the papers themselves, not the reviews. The output should be a single token: 0 if the f... | true | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. Review 1 is AI-generated, Review 2 is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to evaluate the papers themselves, not the reviews. The output should be a single token: 0 if the first paper is better, 1 if the ... | 0 | 0 | apXtolxDaJ | Uj0h13lVrR.md | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0.747966 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that.\n\nFirst, consider the strengths and weaknesses of each paper as described.\n\nPaper 1 (BEER): T... | true | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we need to account for that.
First, consider the strengths and weaknesses of each paper as described.
Paper 1 (BEER): The review highlights strong theoret... | 0 | 0 | apXtolxDaJ | Q1Hr9dVfDS.md | 3 | 6 | 3 | 0.793629 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare the papers based on their reviews, not the reviews themselves. The first review is AI-generated and may be too nice; the second is human-written. We need to evaluate which paper is better based on the content of the reviews, accounting for potential leniency in the... | true | We are asked to compare the papers based on their reviews, not the reviews themselves. The first review is AI-generated and may be too nice; the second is human-written. We need to evaluate which paper is better based on the content of the reviews, accounting for potential leniency in the AI review.
First, understand ... | 0 | 0 | apXtolxDaJ | N581Nje6fH.md | 1 | 6 | 1.5 | 0.749366 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews.\n\nFirst, summarize th... | true | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews.
First, summarize the papers:
Paper 1 (BEER): Propos... | 0 | 0 | apXtolxDaJ | Q1Hr9dVfDS.md | 3 | 6 | 3 | 0.793629 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to compare the two papers based on their reviews. The first paper is about Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT), a parameter-efficient fine-tuning method. The second paper is about MMJAMBA, a hybrid transformer-MAMBA model for multimodal long context processing.\n\nWe have to ev... | true | We need to compare the two papers based on their reviews. The first paper is about Multimodal Representation Tuning (MRT), a parameter-efficient fine-tuning method. The second paper is about MMJAMBA, a hybrid transformer-MAMBA model for multimodal long context processing.
We have to evaluate the papers themselves, not... | 0 | 0 | zxg6601zoc | cagNCwQEEN.md | 3 | 5.75 | 3.4 | 0.821092 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are given two reviews. Review 1 is AI generated (as per instructions) and Review 2 is human written. We need to determine which paper is better, judging from its review. The AI reviewer can sometimes be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to output a single token: 0 if the... | true | We are given two reviews. Review 1 is AI generated (as per instructions) and Review 2 is human written. We need to determine which paper is better, judging from its review. The AI reviewer can sometimes be too nice, so we should account for that. We need to output a single token: 0 if the first paper is better, 1 if th... | 0 | 0 | apXtolxDaJ | vFfMsKjqaH.md | 5 | 6 | 4.25 | 0.813732 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to compare the two papers based on the reviews. The first review (AI-generated) is for a paper called \"BEER\" (a regularizer for value networks in DRL). The second review (human-written) is for a paper called \"Adiabatic Reinforcement Learning (ARL)\" for continual RL.\n\nWe need... | true | We need to compare the two papers based on the reviews. The first review (AI-generated) is for a paper called "BEER" (a regularizer for value networks in DRL). The second review (human-written) is for a paper called "Adiabatic Reinforcement Learning (ARL)" for continual RL.
We need to evaluate the papers themselves, n... | 0 | 0 | apXtolxDaJ | Q1Hr9dVfDS.md | 3 | 6 | 3 | 0.793629 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. First paper (Review 1) is AI-generated, second paper (Review 2) is human-written. The AI reviewer is sometimes too nice, so account for that.\n\nReview 1: The paper is about BEER, a regularizer for value networks in DRL. The re... | true | We need to decide which paper is better based on the reviews. First paper (Review 1) is AI-generated, second paper (Review 2) is human-written. The AI reviewer is sometimes too nice, so account for that.
Review 1: The paper is about BEER, a regularizer for value networks in DRL. The review is detailed, points out stre... | 0 | 0 | apXtolxDaJ | C9BA0T3xhq.md | 2 | 6 | 2 | 0.795326 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is for paper \"BEER: ...\" and is AI-generated (but we are told it's AI, may be too nice). The second review is human-written for a paper on categorical distributional RL and implicit risk-sensitive regularization. We ... | true | We need to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is for paper "BEER: ..." and is AI-generated (but we are told it's AI, may be too nice). The second review is human-written for a paper on categorical distributional RL and implicit risk-sensitive regularization. We need to decide which paper is bet... | 0 | 0 | apXtolxDaJ | vFfMsKjqaH.md | 5 | 6 | 4.25 | 0.813732 | 2 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. First paper is about BEER regularizer for value networks in DRL. Second paper is about interpreting categorical distributional RL as risk-sensitive regularization. The reviews: first review is AI-generated, second is human-w... | true | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. First paper is about BEER regularizer for value networks in DRL. Second paper is about interpreting categorical distributional RL as risk-sensitive regularization. The reviews: first review is AI-generated, second is human-written. The AI reviewer can be ... | 0 | 0 | apXtolxDaJ | vFfMsKjqaH.md | 5 | 6 | 4.25 | 0.813732 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review (Review 1) is AI-generated, and the second (Review 2) is human-written. We need to determine which paper is better, accounting for the fact that the AI reviewer can sometimes be too nice. So we should be critical ... | false | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review (Review 1) is AI-generated, and the second (Review 2) is human-written. We need to determine which paper is better, accounting for the fact that the AI reviewer can sometimes be too nice. So we should be critical of the AI review's potential ov... | 1 | tie | apXtolxDaJ | 9x6yrFAPnx.md | 7 | 6 | 6 | 0.816316 | 1 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review (AI-generated) is for a paper called BEER (presumably a regularizer for value networks in DRL). The second review (human-written) is for a paper on Distributional Bellman Operators over Mean Embeddings.\n\nW... | false | We need to determine which paper is better based on the reviews. The first review (AI-generated) is for a paper called BEER (presumably a regularizer for value networks in DRL). The second review (human-written) is for a paper on Distributional Bellman Operators over Mean Embeddings.
We need to evaluate the papers the... | 0 | tie | apXtolxDaJ | T16M4SzH1v.md | 6 | 6 | 5.5 | 0.804028 | 0 |
[
{
"content": "You are given two reviews of two different papers. Your job is to determine which paper is better, judging from its review — evaluate the papers themselves, not the quality of the reviews. The first review is AI generated and the second one is human written; the AI reviewer can sometimes be too ni... | [
{
"content": "<think>\nWe are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. We need to determine which paper is better, judging from the reviews. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that.\n\nFirst, we need to extract the ... | false | We are asked to compare two papers based on their reviews. The first review is AI-generated, the second is human-written. We need to determine which paper is better, judging from the reviews. The AI reviewer can be too nice, so we should account for that.
First, we need to extract the essence of each paper from the re... | 0 | tie | apXtolxDaJ | T16M4SzH1v.md | 6 | 6 | 5.5 | 0.804028 | 2 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.