text
stringlengths 0
8.13M
|
|---|
2.3.2 Formal definition of a Turing Machine Model
|
There are lots of variations of the basic definitions of a Turing machine in
|
the literature, differing in details and level of formalization. I will choose an
|
approach that is quite formal in order to remove as much of physics that is
|
22
|
possible, following [16]. See also [18] for a modern treatment. The parts of the
|
definition are all motivated by the intended semantics of Turing machines.
|
Program
|
Consider an alphabet A consisting of the following tokens
|
M
|
1. a finite non-empty set of symbols Σ = S ,S ,...,S , not containing
|
1 2 n
|
{ }
|
the special tape blank # or any other tape markers. Σ is called the input
|
alphabet.
|
2. a finite non-empty set of tape symbols Γ, one of which is the tape blank
|
S = used to mark tape ends. Γ also contains any other tape markers
|
0
|
⊔
|
such as # used to separate the input into tuples. Note that Σ Γ.
|
⊆
|
3. a finite non-empty set of internal configurations Q= q ,q ,...,q , also
|
1 2 n
|
{ }
|
called machine states.
|
4. a (small) finite set of halting configurations Q , where Q Q= .
|
h h
|
∩ ∅
|
5. a set of moves M = L,R 7
|
{ }
|
One of the machine states q is singled out as the start state. It is also
|
0
|
convenient to single out halt states. If the machine is programmed for compu-
|
tation problems, one halt state, q , suffices. If the machine is used for decision
|
h
|
problems, two halt states q ,q corresponding to the answers yes or no, are
|
y n
|
{ }
|
singled out. Note that the halting states are not in Q.
|
Anexpression isafinitesequenceoftokenschosenfromA . Aninstruction
|
M
|
is an expression having one of the following forms
|
q S S q R
|
i k l j
|
•
|
q S S q L
|
i k l j
|
•
|
The intuition is that, if the machine is in the configuration q scanning the
|
i
|
symbol S , it prints the symbol S , changes configuration to q and it makes a
|
k l j
|
move R or L.
|
A Turing machine M has a program P that is a finite non-empty set of
|
M
|
instructions. The programcan be thought of as defining a transition function
|
δ :Q Γ (Q Q ) Γ M. (2.2)
|
h
|
× → ∪ × ×
|
This definition makes explicit that there are no transitions from the halting
|
configurations.
|
As an example of the correspondence between instructions and the transi-
|
tion function, note that the instruction q S S q R corresponds to δ(q ,S ) =
|
i k l j i k
|
(q ,S ,R). If the transition function is undefined for a certain q S then there
|
j l i k
|
simply is no instruction in the program P with the first two symbols equal
|
M
|
7Sometimesitisusefultoincludea”nomove”S(Stay).
|
23
|
to q S . In that case the machine gets stuck. This should be considered as a
|
i k
|
programming error, unless the configuration q is not one of the halting config-
|
i
|
urations.
|
No two instructions have the first two symbols q S the same. This means
|
i k
|
that at each step of the computation, the action of the machine is uniquely
|
determined. Therefore, what we have defined so far are deterministic Turing
|
machines. Removing this restriction leads to the classes of non-deterministic,
|
probabilistic and quantum Turing machines respectively. These will be consid-
|
ered in sections 2.7, 2.8 and 6.2.
|
To prepare the way for this generalization, the transition function can be
|
defined in a different way that will be useful when discussing generalizations of
|
the Turing machine concept. Define the function ∆
|
∆:Q Γ (Q Q ) Γ M 0,1 . (2.3)
|
h
|
× × ∪ × × →{ }
|
Clearly,this is afunction frominstructions tothe set 0,1 . Forallinstruc-
|
{ }
|
tionsinthe programP ,∆evaluatesto1. Otherwiseitevaluatesto0(i.e. the
|
M
|
instruction is not contained in the program).
|
This can be formalized somewhat further. Consider the set I of all possible
|
instructions
|
I =Q Γ (Q Q ) Γ M, (2.4)
|
h
|
× × ∪ × ×
|
This is a finite set and a programP is a subset of this set, or P I.8
|
M M
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.